Kelompok six sigma

39
1/46

Transcript of Kelompok six sigma

Page 1: Kelompok six sigma

1/46

Page 2: Kelompok six sigma

2/46

Sigma () adalah suatu huruf dalam alfabet Yunani yang digunakan dalam ilmu statistik untuk menggambarkan STANDAR DEVIASI (distribusi atau penyebaran terhadap nilai rata- rata)

Page 3: Kelompok six sigma

3/46

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Statistical Statistical Process Process ControlControl

Total Total Quality Quality ControlControl

Total Total Quality Quality

ManagementManagement

Six Sigma Six Sigma ApproachApproach

Business Business Excellence Excellence FrameworkFramework

MIKEL J HARRY, MIKEL J HARRY, PROMOTOR PROMOTOR SIX SIGMA SIX SIGMA QUALITYQUALITY

Page 4: Kelompok six sigma

4/46

1

2

USLLSL

3

4

5

6

SIGMA VALUE SIGMA VALUE (Seberapa besar Standard Deviasi memenuhi spesifikasi)(Seberapa besar Standard Deviasi memenuhi spesifikasi)

(Distribution Shifted ± 1.5

Defects per MillionOpportunities

123456

PPMDPMO690000308000 66800 6210 320

3.4

Page 5: Kelompok six sigma

5/46

LSL USL

Normal Distribution Shifted 1.5

(Distribution Shifted ± 1.5

Defects per MillionOpportunities

123456

PPMPPM697700308537 66807 6210 233

3.4

1.51.5

-6-6-5-5-4-4-3-3-2-2-1-1X X 11

LSL : Lower Specification Limit : batas limit bawahUSL : Upper spesification Limit : batas limit atas

4.54.5

Page 6: Kelompok six sigma

6/46

DEFECT = Nonconformity = kesalahan = kegagalan = cacat

• Produk/Service disebut memiliki DEFECT jika terdapat sekurang-kurangnya satu spesifikasi yang tak dipenuhi .

• Defect bisa bersifat minor maupun major Contoh :

Produk/Service Jenis DefectNasi goreng Rasa tidak enak, penyajian tidak menarikLaporan keuangan Terlambat, analisa tidak akuratPengiriman barang Salah barang, salah jumlah, terlambat, rusakPenjualan Tidak mencapai targetRekrutmen Salah orang, lamaMengecat Tergores, mengelupas, tidak rata

DEFECTDEFECT

Page 7: Kelompok six sigma

7/46

3 Sigma 6 Sigma

Untuk setiap 300.000 3.000 salah kirim1 salah kirim surat dikirim

Untuk setiap 500.000 4.100 crash < 2 crashcomputer restarts

Dalam 500 thn, laporan 60 bulan 0.18 bulanBulanan tak balance tak balance

Setiap minggu siaran 1.68 jam 1.8 menit TV per channel dead air dead air

Page 8: Kelompok six sigma

8/46

Bagi Perusahaan :

1. Mempertahankan kelangsungan usaha• Meningkatkan Market share • Customer Retention• Meningkatkan Profit dan Investor Relations• Meningkatkan hubungan dengan Supplier

2. Adanya kejelasan performance yang harus dicapai oleh setiap anggota organisasi

3. Mempercepat kegiatan improvement:• Process Improvement: Defect reduction, Cycle time

reduction, metodologi desain proses • Meningkatkan Produktifitas• Product/service Improvement• Cost Reduction

Page 9: Kelompok six sigma

9/46

Bagi Perusahaan :

4. Mendorong budaya belajar di dalam organisasi• Meningkatkan skill karyawan dalam memperbaiki

proses

5. Mendorong dilakukannya perubahan yang bersifat strategis • Culture Change

Bagi Pelanggan:

Meningkatkan “value to customer”• Produk / service yang bermutu tinggi • Biaya yang murah harga murah

Page 10: Kelompok six sigma

10/46

Six Sigma is in use in virtually all industries around the world. Some of companies can be listed as:MotorolaEricssonGeneral ElectricSonyFord Motor Co.CITI bank

•1010

Page 11: Kelompok six sigma

11/46

Page 12: Kelompok six sigma

12/46

Page 13: Kelompok six sigma

13/46

› Define specific goals to achieve outcomes, consistent with customers demand and business strategy

› Measure reduction of defects› Analyze problems, cause and effects must be

considered› Improve process on bases of measurements and

analysis› Control process to minimize defects

•1313

Page 14: Kelompok six sigma

14/46

Page 15: Kelompok six sigma

15/46

Page 16: Kelompok six sigma

16/46

Page 17: Kelompok six sigma

17/46

Page 18: Kelompok six sigma

18/46

Define the project Measure the

opportunity Analyze the process Design the process Verify the performance

•1818

Page 19: Kelompok six sigma

19/46

Six Sigma Compared to TQM

Extensive

Money

International Standard

Little

Quality

Use Internal Standard

Appliedstatisticstools

Ultimateobjective

Standarization

Six Sigma TQM

Mikel J. Harry)

Page 20: Kelompok six sigma

20/46

SIX SIGMA vs BALANCE SCORECARDSIX SIGMA vs BALANCE SCORECARD

Identifikasi hal-hal yang membuat

Organisasi sukses

Tetapkan “Performance Driver”

Identifikasi key proses yang

berdampak pada performance

Tetapkan ukuran, monitor dan evaluasi

Six Sigma strategic projects

Six Sigma strategic projects

Page 21: Kelompok six sigma

21/46

•Perbedaan ke-4 Business Management System

Page 22: Kelompok six sigma

22/46•22

If you want to make yourself more valuable and attractive to employers then get training and certification

Option I – Certification as Six Sigma Green Belt Option II – Certification as Six Sigma Black Belt

Page 23: Kelompok six sigma

23/46

Page 24: Kelompok six sigma

24/46

Page 25: Kelompok six sigma

25/46

Page 26: Kelompok six sigma

26/46

Page 27: Kelompok six sigma

27/46

Page 28: Kelompok six sigma

28/46

Page 29: Kelompok six sigma

29/46

What did they learn ? How did they learn? What were the facilitators? What were the barriers? How did they deal with issues?

•All the answer were categorized, summarized and then create an

Affinity Diagram

Page 30: Kelompok six sigma

30/46

Page 31: Kelompok six sigma

31/46

As expected, through the projects conducted, team members learned about the DFSS methodology.

However, through the development of their new or redesigned processes, they also learned about the value of evaluation, process improvement, and project management.

Furthermore, project team members indicated they learned through hands-on practice, as a result of their knowledge about the DFSS approach, as well as assistance from both inside and outside their organization.

Challenges : not having member that having critical information, time management, resistance to change and lack of buy in.

Page 32: Kelompok six sigma

32/46

This research involved conducting case studies in a small number of behavioral/mental healthcare facilities, the findings may not be generalizable to other settings.

This study only considered individual level learning examined through the collection of qualitative data, which may have limited the ability to draw broad conclusions from this research beyond the comments made by individual project team members through their journal entries.

Hence, future studies should examine learning within the context of DFSS projects through a larger sample of project teams. It may also be useful to employ a methodology that collects both qualitative as well as quantitative data to provide more support for conclusions drawn from the research.

Page 33: Kelompok six sigma

33/46

Page 34: Kelompok six sigma

34/46•3434

Author : Ion Durbaca, Elena-Florentina Radu, Adrian-Costin Durbaca Politehnica University of Bucharest, Spl. Independentei 313, Bucharest, Romania

Publisher : Alma Mater Publishing HousePublished Year : 2015

Page 35: Kelompok six sigma

35/46

Global Plan for Water Quality Monitoring, which is part of global system monitoring environment (GEMS), initiated by the United Nations Enviromental Program provides tracking of water quality through three category parameters:a.Basic parameters (temperature, pH, resitivity, dissolved oxygen, coli bacilli);b.Indicative parameters of persistent pollution (cadmium, mercury, halogenated organic compounds, anorganic mineral oils);c.Optional parameters ( total organic carbon – COT, biochemical oxygen demand –CBO5, anionic detergents, heavy metals, arsenic, boron, sodium cyanide, total oil, strepcococci).

•3535

Page 36: Kelompok six sigma

36/46

Specific phases of this method are presented in order application:• Defining the opportunities (defect/nonconformities etc)• Measuring the current level performance• Analysis of opportunities (the main causes of problem/defects)• Improving the performance by identifying and implementating

the solustions which eliminates the source of defects• Control performance

•3636

Page 37: Kelompok six sigma

37/46

Defining quality improvement opportunities (D)writer use the brainstorming technique for identifying defective

opportunities (DOi) with criterias (C), and the result is quality indicator classification – pH within specifications (DO1) has the bigger precentage from total, which mean has the bigger opportunities to be defective

Measurement of current performance level (M)The quality analysis of water quality characteristics, consisting 30

water samples taken from different sources on the same site. Using the “six sigma” approach statistical method, the result of the specifications (pH) limits is lower 5,632 and upper 8,614 (approtiate six sigma level, equivalent to 3,4 defect per one million opportunities)

•3737

Page 38: Kelompok six sigma

38/46

Analysis quality improvement opportunities (A)This study calls for undertaking measures regarding the removal of

reduction of the cause/causes related to the quality problem Improving the performances (I)At the level of organization for which this study is done, it must be

rigorously enforced the implementation of an algorithm that includes the following steps to improve performance

Performances control (C)Identification of actual performance measuring process with actual

control should prevent the recurrence of nonconformities and maintain the achievements through improvement

•3838

Page 39: Kelompok six sigma

39/46

Given that the basic requirement of measured values for hydrogen ion concentration (pH) that characterize the quality of drinking water needed in aforemantioned industry, is represented by the need for a weakly alkaline nature, so that all pH values should lie strictly within imposed specifications limit (LIS = 7.0 dan LSS 7.5)But by implementing the statistical method six sigma, those specifications limits calculated (lower 5.362 and upper 8.614) are more permissible.

•3939