Kelompok 5 Ok
-
Upload
jessy-fransiska -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Kelompok 5 Ok
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 2/36
Mortality RateAppropriate vs Inappropriate Therapy
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
M o r t a l i t y r a t e %
Inappropriate therapy Appropriate therapy
Antimicrob agent Chemother 1997 May;41(5):1127-33
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 3/36
In Vitro Results of Combination
Therapy
• Additive (indifferent) effect: the activity of two
drugs in combination is equal to the sum (or a
partial sum) of their independent activity when
studied separately
• Synergistic effect: the activity of two drugs in
combination is greater to the sum of their
independent activity when studied separately• Antagonistic effect: the activity of two drugs in
combination is less to the sum (or a partial sum) of
their independent activity when studied separately
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 4/36
Synergistic Effect
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Hours
L o g N o . V a i a b l e O r g
a n i s m s
Drug A
A+B
Drug B
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 5/36
Antagonistic Effect
01
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Hours
L o g N o . V a i a b l e O r g
a n i s m s
Drug A
A+B
Drug B
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 6/36
Additive (Indifferent) Effect
01
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Hours
L o g N o . V a i a b l e O r g
a n i s m s
Drug A
A+B
Drug B
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 7/36
Indications for the Clinical Use of
Antimicrobial Combinations
• Prevention of the emergence of resistant
organisms• Polymicrobial infection
• Initial therapy
• Decreased toxicity• Synergism
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 8/36
Prevention of the Emergence of
Resistant Organisms
• Decreased resistant mycobacterium
tuberculosis with combination treatment of
• Reduction of -lactamase induction with
combination -lactam agents and
aminoglycosides
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 9/36
Polymicrobial Infection
• Intraabdominal infection: ciprofloxacin and
metronidazole
• Pelvic infection
• Mixed aerobic and anaerobic organism
• Availability of broad spectrum antibiotics
such as carbapenems and -lactam- -
lactamase inhibitors restrict the use of
combination antibiotics
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 10/36
Initial Therapy
• Neutropenic patients: Ceftazidime and
vancomycin
• In patients where the nature of infection is
not clear yet: high dose ceftriaxone along
with vancomycin in suspected
pneumococcal meningitis in areas of highrate of penicillin resistance
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 11/36
Decreased Toxicity
• Decrease the toxic drug required for
treatment and thus reduce the dose related
toxicity
• No data from clinical trials that establish
without doubt that combination therapy
with different agents permits a reduction ofthe drug dose sufficient to reduce dose-
related toxicity
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 13/36
Synergism
Inhibition of Sequential Steps
• Sulfonamide with trimithoprim
• Treatment and prevention of chronic urinary
tract infection, typhoid fever and shigellosis
caused by organisms resistant to ampicillin
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 14/36
Disadvantages of the Inappropriate Use
of Antimicrobial Combination
•
Antagonism• Increased cost
• Adverse effects
• Superinfection
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 15/36
Antagonism
• Few well-documented clinical examples of
antagonism
• Bactericidal agents converts to bacteriostatic
• More prominent in immunocompromised
patients or in infections where localizedhost defenses may be inadequate such as
meningitis and endocarditis
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 16/36
-lactam - -lactam Antagonism
• Induction of B-lactamase by one agent,
renders the second agent ineffective
• Enterobacter, Serratia, or pseudomonas
• The exact clinical significance of this
phenomenon is not clear
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 17/36
Mortality in Bacterial Meningitis
0
10
20
30
40
50
6070
80
90
100
Penicillin alone Penicillin and
chlortetracyline
Mortality rate
Lepper and Dowlling, Arch Intern Med . 1951
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 18/36
Direct Interaction of Drugs
• If chloramphenicaol is inadvertently mixed
together with erythromycin in the same
parenteral infusion solution, they may forminsoluble precipitates and hence lose
activity
• Mixing ticarcillin or carbenicillin withaminoglycosides results in the inactivation
of the aminoglycosides
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 19/36
Specific Antimicrobial
Combinations
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 20/36
Double -LactamsOverview of synergy with reference to double
-lactam combination
• Mostly additive effects
•Rarely synergistic effect
• Sometimes antagonistic effect
• Antagonism was seen mainly when treating
enterobacter or pseudomonas infections
DICP 1991 Sep;25(9):972-7
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 21/36
Double -LactamsDouble -lactam regimen compared to an
aminoglycoside/ -lactam regimen as empiric antibiotictherapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients
• In vitro synergism was demonstrated in 73%
• Antagonism was not seen
• Outcome and nephrotoxicity were similar
• Incidence of secondary infection was higher
in double -lactam group
Support Care Cancer 1993 Jul;1(4):186-94
D bl L t
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 22/36
Double -Lactams
-lactam antibiotic therapy in febrile granulocytopenic
patients. A randomized trial comparing cefoperazone plus
piperacillin, ceftazidime plus piperacillin, and imipenem
alone• Double beta-lactams therapy was as effective
as imipenem alone• Superinfections occurred more often in the
double beta-lactam group
•
Cost of imipenem alone was lower thancombination beta-lactams
Ann Intern Medicine 1991 Dec;1;115(11):849-59
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 23/36
-Lactam & AminoglycosidesMonotherapy versus -lactam-aminoglycoside combination
treatment for gram-negative bacteremia: a prospective,observational study
• Combination therapy has no advantage overtreatment with an appropriate beta-lactam
drug in nonneutropenic patients with gram-
negative bacteremia
Antimicrob agent Chemother 1997 May;41(5):1127-33
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 25/36
Monotherapy VS Combination TherapyCeftazidime VS Tobramycin/Ticarcillin in NAP
88%83%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%70%
80%
90%
100%
% o r f s u c c e s s
Ceftazidime Tobramycin/Ticarcillin
Rapp et al, Pharmacology 1984;4:211-215
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 26/36
Fink, AAC 1994;38;547
Monotherapy for Severe
Pneumonia
• Multicenter, double-blind trial (n=405)
– Randomized to:
• Ciprofloxacin 400 mg q8h or
• Imipenem/cilastatin 1000 mg q8h
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 27/36
Monotherapy For Severe PneumoniaDevelopment of Resistance on Therapy
Pathogen Cipro Imipenem
All organisms 9% 11%
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa
33% 53%
Fink, AAC 1994;38;547
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 28/36
Bacteremia due to P. aeruginosa
Antibiotic Rx Combined Mono
Mortality rates
Pneumonia 7/20 (35%) 7/8 (88%)
Critically ill 18/37 (47%) 11/12 (92%)
All patients 38/143 (27%) 20/43 (47%)
Hilf, Am J Med 1989:87;540
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 29/36
HAP due to P. aeruginosa
•
Mortality high (>50%)• Monotherapy inadequate
– High rate of failure or relapse
– Emergence of resistance
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 30/36
Aminoglycoside plus B-lactam
• Rationale:
– Synergy in vitro
– Improved survival
– Prevent emergence resistance
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 31/36
HAP due to P. aeruginosa
•
Empirical therapy• Combine 2 active drugs:
– B-lactam+aminoglycoside
– B-lactam+quinolone
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 32/36
-Lactam & QuinolonesActivity of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin in combination with
other antimicrobial agents
• Combination effect of quinolones and
macrolides, aminoglycosides, beta-lactams,
and vancomycin was only additive
(indifferent) against staphyloccocus aureus,
E. coli, pseudomonas aeruginosa,
enterococcus feacalis and streptococcus pneumoniae
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001 Feb;17(2):103-7
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 33/36
-Lactam & QuinolonesComparison of bactericidal activity of trovafloxacin
and ciprofloxacin, alone and in combination withcefepime, against P. aeruginosa
• Activity of trovafloxacin against p.
aeruginosa showed synergistic effects when
combined with beta-lactam agent
Chemotherapy 2000 Nov-Dec;46(6):383-9
Quinupristin-dalfopristin combined with beta-
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 34/36
Quinupristin-dalfopristin combined with beta-
lactams for the treatment of experimental
endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus
constitutively resistant to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B antibiotics
• Synergistic effect
• Q-D-beta-lactam combinations might be
useful for the treatment of complicated
infections caused by multiple organisms,
including MRSA
Antimicrobial agents Chemother 2000 Jul;(7):1789-95
8/13/2019 Kelompok 5 Ok
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/kelompok-5-ok 35/36
In vitro synergistic effect of double and triple
combinations of beta-lactams, vancomycin,
and netilmicin against MRSA strains
• Synergistic effect was found between
imipenem and vancomycin and betweencefazolin and vancomycin
Antimicrobial agents Chemother 2000 Nov;(11):3055-60