DAFTAR PUSTAKA -...

52

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Bornstein NM. Stroke Practical Guide for Clinicians Bornstein NM.

Switzerland: Karger; 2009. 9-23 p.

2. RI BP dan PKKK. Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2013. Jakarta; 2013.

3. Widyono. Profil Kesehatan Kota Semarang 2014 [Internet]. Semarang;

2014. Available from: www.dinkes-kotasemarang.go.id

4. Mohr, JP, Philip A Wolf JCG. Stroke Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and

Management. Elsevier Saunders. Philadelphia; 2011. 295-307 p.

5. Martin JH. Neuroanatomy Text and Atlas. 3rd ed. Mc Graw Hill; 2003.

6. Chong TT-J, Fedi M. Acute management of stroke – II: haemorrhagic

stroke. Anaesth Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2013;14(9):366–70.

Available from:

http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1472029913001975

7. Zis P, Leivadeas P, Michas D, Kravaritis D, Angelidakis P, Tavernarakis

A. Predicting 30-day case fatality of primary inoperable intracerebral

hemorrhage based on findings at the emergency department. J Stroke

Cerebrovasc Dis [Internet]. 2014 Aug 8;23(7):1928–33. Available from:

http://www.strokejournal.org/article/S1052305714000664/fulltext

8. Hanifah, Dinna, Dyan Roshinta Laksmi Dewi SNYRSA. Pengaruh Volume

Perdarahan dan Skor Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Saat Masuk Rumah

Sakit Terhadap Kejadian Mortalitas Pada Pasien Stroke Perdarahan

Intraserebral Di RSUD DR. Soedarso Pontianak. 2015;1:1689–99.

9. WJ Powers JJ. Stroke Overview. Elsevier Saunders. Philadelphia; 2014.

10. Zazulia A. Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Primary. Elsevier Saunders.

Philadelphia; 2014.

11. Kleinman JT, Jordan LC, Hillis AE. ABC/2: estimating intracerebral

haemorrhage volume and total brain volume and predicting outcome in

children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;

53

12. Kumar A, Shetty V. Abstract W P330: Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume

Measurement: Modified ABC/2 Method is Faster and Reliable. Stroke

[Internet]. 2015 Feb 1;46(Suppl_1):AWP330 – . Available from:

http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/46/Suppl_1/AWP330

13. Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke:

clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging [Internet].

2013;8:201–11. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3578502/

14. Budiyono T. Hubungan Derajat Berat Stroke Non Hemoragik pada saat

Masuk Rumah Sakit dengan Waktu Pencapaian Maksimal Aktifitas

Kehidupan Sehari-hari. Universitas Diponegoro; 2005.

15. Wihartantie A, dr. Retno Dwi Danarti SRO. Hubungan Perdarahan

Intraserebral Dan Glasgow Coma Scale Pada Stroke Dengan Pemeriksaan

Multiclice Computed Tomography Scan. 2011; Available from:

http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=Pen

elitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=53536

16. Singh AJ, Pmr DNB. CT Scan as a Tool for Predicting Outcome of Stroke

due to Intracerebral Haemorrhage at a Referral Hospital.

2006;17(October):33–8.

17. Demchuk AM, Dowlatshahi D, Rodriguez-Luna D, Molina C a., Blas YS,

Dzialowski I, et al. Prediction of haematoma growth and outcome in

patients with intracerebral haemorrhage using the CT-angiography spot

sign (PREDICT): A prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol

[Internet]. 2012;11(4):307–14. Available from:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70038-8

18. Ritarwan K. Pengaruh Suhu Tubuh Terhadap Outcome Penderita Stroke

Yang Dirawat Di RSUP H. Adam Malik Medan. 2003;1–30.

19. Kim K-H. Predictors of 30-day mortality and 90-day functional recovery

after primary intracerebral hemorrhage : hospital based multivariate

analysis in 585 patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc [Internet]. 2009

Jun;45(6):341–9. Available from:

54

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2711231&tool=

pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

20. Joarder M, Karim A, Barua K, Hossain M. A study on-effect of hematoma

and perihematomal edema volume on GCS at the time of admission in

patients with spontaneous lobar and basal ganglia hemorrhage. Pulse

[Internet]. 2015 May 7;7(1):22. Available from:

http://www.banglajol.info/index.php/PULSE/article/view/23246

21. Rea P. Essential Clinical Anatomy of The Nervous System. Academic

Press; 2015. 4 p.

22. David S Liebeskind M. Hemorrhagic Stroke: Practice Essentials,

Background, Anatomy. Medscape [Internet]. 2015; Available from:

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1916662-overview

23. Sidharta P DG. Anatomi Susunan Saraf Pusat Manusia. Jakarta: Dian

Rakyat; 1986. 398 p.

24. J G. Basic Neurology 3rd Edition. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000.

25. Layanto A. Hubungan Antara Lokasi Lesi Pada Penderita Stroke Iskemik

Fase Akut Dengan Waktu Perawatan Dan Waktu Kematian Dalam 30 Hari

Pertama. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2009.

26. Tubbs RS. Circle of Willis Anatomy: Overview, Gross Anatomy, Natural

Variants. Medscape [Internet]. 2013; Available from:

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1877617-overview

27. Cristy. Asosiasi Genotip Apolipoprotein E Dengan Fungsi Kognitif Pada

Pasien Pasca Stroke Iskemik. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2011.

28. Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, Davis SM. Stroke. Lancet [Internet].

2008 May 10;371(9624):1612–23. Available from:

http://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140673608606947/fulltext

29. Smith EE, Liang L, Hernandez a., Reeves MJ, Cannon CP, Fonarow GC,

et al. Influence of stroke subtype on quality of care in the Get with the

Guidelines-Stroke Program. Neurology. 2009;73(9):709–16.

30. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJB, Culebras A,

et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for

55

healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American

Stroke Association. Stroke [Internet]. 2013 Jul;44(7):2064–89. Available

from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23652265

31. Soeharto I. Penyakit Jantung Koroner dan Serangan Jantung :

Pencegahan,Penyembuhan, Rehabilitasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka;

2004.

32. Saenger AK, Christenson RH. Stroke biomarkers: progress and challenges

for diagnosis, prognosis, differentiation, and treatment. Clin Chem

[Internet]. 2010 Jan;56(1):21–33. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19926776

33. Gorelick PB. Risk factors for vascular dementia and Alzheimer disease.

Stroke. 2004;35(11 SUPPL. 1):2620–2.

34. Zebian B, Critchley G. Spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage. Surgery

[Internet]. 2012;30(3):136–41. Available from:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2011.12.005

35. LR C. Caplan’s Stroke : A Clinical Approach. 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworth-

Heineman; 2000.

36. Quinones-Hinojosa A. Schmidek & sweet Operative Neurosurgical

Techniques Indications, Methods, and Results. 2nd ed. Philadelphia:

Elsevier; 2012.

37. Chan S, Hemphill JC. Critical Care Management of Intracerebral

Hemorrhage. Crit Care Clin [Internet]. 2014;30(4):699–717. Available

from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749070414000499

38. Alberti A, Agnelli G, Caso V, Venti M, Acciarresi M, D’Amore C, et al.

Non-neurological complications of acute stroke: frequency and influence

on clinical outcome. Intern Emerg Med. 2011;6(S1):119–23.

39. Bonaiuti D, Sioli P, Fumagalli L, Beghi E, Agostoni E. Acute medical

complications in patients admitted to a stroke unit and safe transfer to

rehabilitation. Neurol Sci [Internet]. 2011;32(4):619–23. Available from:

http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10072-011-0588-2

40. Zimmerman RD, Maldjian JA, Brun NC, Horvath B, Skolnick BE.

56

Radiologic estimation of hematoma volume in intracerebral hemorrhage

trial by CT scan. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol [Internet]. 2006 Mar;27(3):666–

70. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16552014

41. Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, Tomsick T, Huster G. Volume of

Intracerebral Hemorrhage A Powerful and Easy-to-Use Predictor of 30-Day

Mortality. 1988;

42. Setiahardja AS. Penilaian Keseimbangan dengan Aktivitas Kehidupan

Sehari-hari pada Lansia. Universitas Diponegoro; 2005.

43. Isaac E. MDS. Hemorrhagic Stroke: An Atlas of Investigation and

Treatment. Clinical Publishing; 2010.

44. Yasaka M, Sakata T, Minematsu K, Naritomi H. Correction of INR by

prothrombin complex concentrate and vitamin K in patients with warfarin

related hemorrhagic complication. Thromb Res. 2002;108(1):25–30.

45. Nag C, Das K, Ghosh M, Khandakar MR. Prediction of clinical outcome in

acute hemorrhagic stroke from a single CT scan on admission. N Am J

Med Sci. 2012;4(10):463–7.

46. Anggiamurni L. Hubungan Volume Dan Letak Lesi Hematoma Dengan

Kecepatan Pemulihan Fungsi Motorik Penderita Stroke Hemoragik

Berdasarkan Kategori Skala Orgogozo. Universitas Diponegoro; 2010.

47. Castellanos M, Leira R, Tejada J, Gil-Peralta A, Dávalos A, Castillo J, et

al. Predictors of good outcome in medium to large spontaneous

supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhages. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

[Internet]. 2005 May;76(5):691–5. Available from:


48. Molshatzki N, Orion D, Tsabari R, Schwammenthal Y, Merzeliak O,

Toashi M, et al. Chronic kidney disease in patients with acute intracerebral

hemorrhage: association with large hematoma volume and poor outcome.

Cerebrovasc Dis [Internet]. 2011;31(3):271–7. Available from:


49. Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of Age on Functional Outcomes

After Stroke Rehabilitation. Stroke [Internet]. 2002 Jan 1;33(1):179–85.

57

Available from:

http://stroke.ahajournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1161/hs0102.101224

50. Yu C, An Z, Zhao W, Wang W, Gao C, Liu S, et al. Sex Differences in

Stroke Subtypes, Severity, Risk Factors, and Outcomes among Elderly

Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Front Aging Neurosci [Internet].

2015;7:174. Available from:


51. Saxena A, Anderson CS, Wang X, Sato S, Arima H, Chan E, et al.

Prognostic Significance of Hyperglycemia in Acute Intracerebral

Hemorrhage. Stroke [Internet]. 2016 Jan

26;47(3):STROKEAHA.115.011627. Available from:

http://stroke.ahajournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.01162

7

52. Iqbal M, Frida M, Yaswir R. Perbedaan Rerata Kadar Gula Darah pada

Luaran Stroke Iskemik Berdasarkan Indeks Barthel. J Kesehat Andalas.

2014;3(3).

53. Karunawan NH, Pinzon RT, Saputro SA. Pengaruh Kondisi Hiperglikemia

Saat Masuk RS terhadap Luaran Fungsional Pasien Stroke Iskemik di RS

Bethesda. Cermin Dunia Kedokt. 2016;43(2):87–90.

54. Kurube I. Stroke Hemoragik Pada Pasien Yang Dirawat Di RSUP Dr .

Wahidin Sudirohusodo Periode Juli 2012- Desember 2012. 2013;

55. Susilo TA. Pengaruh Hiperglikemia Terhadap Mortalitas Pada Penderita

Stroke Iskemik Fase Akut Di Rsud Dr. Moewardi. 2015;

56. Greer DM, Funk SE, Reaven NL, Ouzounelli M, Uman GC. Impact of

fever on outcome in patients with stroke and neurologic injury: a

comprehensive meta-analysis. Stroke [Internet]. 2008 Nov;39(11):3029–35.

Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18723420

57. El-solh A, Sikka P, Bozkanat E, Jaafar W. Morbid Obesity in the Medical

ICU Morbid Obesity in the Medical ICU. October. 2007;1989–97.

58. Marlina I, Dr. dr. Ismail Setyopranoto SS. Skor Perdarahan Intraventrikel

Sebagai Prediktor Mortalitas Pada Pasien Stroke Perdarahan Intraserebral.

58

2013.

59. Chen G, Arima H, Wu G, Heeley E, Delcourt C, Zhang P, et al.

Subarachnoid extension of intracerebral hemorrhage and 90-day outcomes

in INTERACT2. Stroke [Internet]. 2014 Jan;45(1):258–60. Available from:


59

Lampiran 1. Ethichal Clearance

60

Lampiran 2. Surat Ijin Penelitian

63

Lampiran 3. Data Hasil Pengukuran

No CM Usia Jenis

kelamin

Hipertensi Diabetes

Melitus

Hiperkolesterolemia Obesitas SAH IVH Volume

perdarahan

Barthel

Index

C550543 55 tahun laki-laki Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 80 0

A567266 48 tahun laki-laki Tidak Tidak Tidak Ya Tidak Tidak 10,28 38

C563832 78 tahun laki-laki Ya Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 14,22 20

C540047 63 tahun laki-laki Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 16,8 0

C579201 40 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak 45 0

C542601 48 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 18,66 20

C568878 74 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak 30,75 0

C540566 50 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 18,36 35

C586734 60 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak 26 19

64

C585587 58 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Ya Ya Tidak Tidak 60,35 59

B244140 47 tahun laki-laki Tidak Tidak Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak 58,3 20

C569284 46 tahun laki-laki Ya Tidak Tidak Ya Ya Tidak 46,76 100

C578053 64 tahun perempuan Tidak Ya Ya Tidak Ya Tidak 1,94 20

C573334 61 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Ya Ya Tidak Ya 15,85 20

C567418 84 tahun perempuan Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 11 14

C566529 70 tahun laki-laki Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Ya Tidak 63 20

C574728 54 tahun Laki-laki Tidak Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Ya 23,3 20


C572627 66 tahun laki-laki Tidak Ya Tidak Tidak Ya Ya 10,64 19

C57834 62 tahun laki-laki Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Ya 32 6

C573545 46 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak 17,87 0

65

C366230 55 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya 44,46 17


C565083 61 tahun laki-laki Ya Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Ya 74 0

B260516 74 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak 1,29 20

C572827 74 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak Tidak 39 17

C510142 46 tahun perempuan Ya Tidak Ya Ya Tidak Tidak 19,21 19

C567202 52 tahun perempuan Ya Ya Ya Ya Tidak Tidak 5,6 0

C576094 57 tahun laki-laki Ya Tidak Tidak Ya Tidak Ya 0,42 51

66

Lampiran 4. Hasil Analisa Statistik

Frequencies

Frequency Table

Jenis kelamin

12 41.4 41.4 41.4

17 58.6 58.6 100.0

29 100.0 100.0

Laki-laki

Perempuan

Total

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e

Percent

Hipertensi

22 75.9 75.9 75.9

7 24.1 24.1 100.0

29 100.0 100.0

Ya

Tidak

Total

Valid


Cumulat iv e

Percent

DM

12 41.4 41.4 41.4

17 58.6 58.6 100.0

29 100.0 100.0

Ya

Tidak

Total

Valid


Cumulat iv e

Percent

Hiperkolesterolemia

11 37.9 37.9 37.9

18 62.1 62.1 100.0

29 100.0 100.0

Ya

Tidak

Total

Valid


Cumulat iv e

Percent

67

Obesitas

8 27.6 27.6 27.6

21 72.4 72.4 100.0

29 100.0 100.0

Ya

Tidak

Total

Valid


Cumulat iv e

Percent

SAH

4 13.8 13.8 13.8

25 86.2 86.2 100.0

29 100.0 100.0

Ya

Tidak

Total

Valid


Cumulat iv e

Percent

IVH

7 24.1 24.1 24.1

22 75.9 75.9 100.0

29 100.0 100.0

Ya

Tidak

Total

Valid


Cumulat iv e

Percent

Barthel Index

23 79.3 79.3 79.3

5 17.2 17.2 96.6

1 3.4 3.4 100.0

29 100.0 100.0

Total

Berat

Mandiri

Total

Valid


Cumulat iv e

Percent

68

Explore

Nonparametric Correlations

Case Summaries

29 29 29

58.83 30.51 20.21

11.000 22.565 21.569

58.00 23.30 19.00

40 0 0

84 80 100

N

Mean

Std. Dev iation

Median

Minimum

Maximum

Usia

Volume

perdarahan Barthel Index

Tests of Normality

.963 29 .382

.933 29 .065

.773 29 .000

Usia

Volume perdarahan

Barthel Index

Stat ist ic df Sig.

Shapiro-Wilk

Lillief ors Signif icance Correctiona.

Correlations

1.000 -.200 -.074

. .299 .704

29 29 29

-.200 1.000 -.165

.299 . .391

29 29 29

-.074 -.165 1.000

.704 .391 .

29 29 29

Correlation Coef f icient

Sig. (2-tailed)

N


Sig. (2-tailed)

N


Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Usia

Volume perdarahan

Barthel Index

Spearman's rho

Usia

Volume

perdarahan Barthel Index

69

Graph

Graph

70

Crosstabs

Jenis kelamin * Barthel Index

Crosstab

9 3 12

9.5 2.5 12.0

39.1% 50.0% 41.4%

14 3 17

13.5 3.5 17.0

60.9% 50.0% 58.6%

23 6 29

23.0 6.0 29.0

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Count

Expected Count

% within Barthel Index

Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Laki-laki

Perempuan

Jenis kelamin

Total

Total Berat /Mandiri

Barthel Index

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.232b 1 .630

.000 1 .987

.229 1 .632

.669 .487

.224 1 .636

29

Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association

N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.

48.

b.

71

Hipertensi * Barthel Index

Crosstab

17 5 22

17.4 4.6 22.0

73.9% 83.3% 75.9%

6 1 7

5.6 1.4 7.0

26.1% 16.7% 24.1%

23 6 29

23.0 6.0 29.0

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Ya

Tidak

Hipertensi

Total


Barthel Index

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.231b 1 .631

.000 1 1.000

.245 1 .620

1.000 .545

.223 1 .637

29

Pearson Chi-Square


Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association

N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)



45.

b.

72

DM * Barthel Index

Crosstab

11 1 12

9.5 2.5 12.0

47.8% 16.7% 41.4%

12 5 17

13.5 3.5 17.0

52.2% 83.3% 58.6%

23 6 29

23.0 6.0 29.0

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Ya

Tidak

DM

Total


Barthel Index

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.905b 1 .168

.837 1 .360

2.088 1 .148

.354 .182

1.839 1 .175

29

Pearson Chi-Square


Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association

N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)



48.

b.

73

Hiperkolesterolemia * Barthel Index

Crosstab

10 1 11

8.7 2.3 11.0

43.5% 16.7% 37.9%

13 5 18

14.3 3.7 18.0

56.5% 83.3% 62.1%

23 6 29

23.0 6.0 29.0

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Ya

Tidak

Hiperkolesterolemia

Total


Barthel Index

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.453b 1 .228

.537 1 .464

1.597 1 .206

.362 .237

1.403 1 .236

29

Pearson Chi-Square


Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association

N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)



28.

b.

74

Obesitas * Barthel Index

Crosstab

4 4 8

6.3 1.7 8.0

17.4% 66.7% 27.6%

19 2 21

16.7 4.3 21.0

82.6% 33.3% 72.4%

23 6 29

23.0 6.0 29.0

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Ya

Tidak

Obesitas

Total


Barthel Index

Total

Chi-Square Tests

5.784b 1 .016

3.580 1 .058

5.270 1 .022

.033 .033

5.585 1 .018

29

Pearson Chi-Square


Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association

N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)



66.

b.

75

SAH * Barthel Index

Crosstab

3 1 4

3.2 .8 4.0

13.0% 16.7% 13.8%

20 5 25

19.8 5.2 25.0

87.0% 83.3% 86.2%

23 6 29

23.0 6.0 29.0

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Ya

Tidak

SAH

Total


Barthel Index

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.053b 1 .819

.000 1 1.000

.051 1 .822

1.000 .627

.051 1 .822

29

Pearson Chi-Square


Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association

N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)


2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .

83.

b.

76

IVH * Barthel Index

Crosstab

6 1 7

5.6 1.4 7.0

26.1% 16.7% 24.1%

17 5 22

17.4 4.6 22.0

73.9% 83.3% 75.9%

23 6 29

23.0 6.0 29.0

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Count

Expected Count


Ya

Tidak

IVH

Total


Barthel Index

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.231b 1 .631

.000 1 1.000

.245 1 .620

1.000 .545

.223 1 .637

29

Pearson Chi-Square


Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear

Association

N of Valid Cases

Value df

Asy mp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)



45.

b.

77

Explore

Barthel Index

Usia

Case Summaries

Usia

23 60.26 11.624 61.00 40 84

6 53.33 6.121 53.50 46 61

29 58.83 11.000 58.00 40 84

Barthel Index

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Total

N Mean Std. Dev iat ion Median Minimum Maximum

Tests of Normality

.972 23 .746

.912 6 .448

Barthel Index

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Usia

Stat ist ic df Sig.

Shapiro-Wilk


78

T-Test

Group Statistics

23 60.26 11.624 2.424

6 53.33 6.121 2.499

Barthel Index

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Usia

N Mean Std. Dev iat ion

Std. Error

Mean

Independent Samples Test

2.179

.151

1.397 1.990

27 15.679

.174 .064

6.928 6.928

4.959 3.481

-3.248 -.465

17.103 14.320

F

Sig.

Levene's Test f or

Equality of Variances

t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Dif ference

Std. Error Dif ference

Lower

Upper

95% Conf idence Interv al

of the Dif f erence

t-test for Equality of

Means

Equal variances

assumed

Equal variances

not assumed

Usia

79

Explore

Case Summaries

Volume perdarahan

23 30.46 22.697 23.30 1 80

6 30.70 24.179 32.56 0 60

29 30.51 22.565 23.30 0 80

Barthel Index

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Total

N Mean Std. Dev iat ion Median Minimum Maximum

Tests of Normality

.923 23 .076

.912 6 .450

Barthel Index

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Volume perdarahan

Stat istic df Sig.

Shapiro-Wilk


80

T-Test

Group Statistics

23 30.46 22.697 4.733

6 30.70 24.179 9.871

Barthel Index

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Volume perdarahan

N Mean Std. Dev iation

Std. Error

Mean

Independent Samples Test

.207

.652

-.022 -.021

27 7.473

.982 .983

-.235 -.235

10.534 10.947

-21.849 -25.792

21.378 25.322

F

Sig.

Levene's Test f or

Equality of Variances

t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Dif ference

Std. Error Dif ference

Lower

Upper

95% Conf idence Interv al

of the Dif f erence

t-test for Equality of

Means

Equal variances

assumed

Equal variances

not assumed

Volume perdarahan

81

Logistic Regression

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)

Classification Tablea

22 1 95.7

3 3 50.0

86.2

22 1 95.7

3 3 50.0

86.2

22 1 95.7

3 3 50.0

86.2

22 1 95.7

3 3 50.0

86.2

22 1 95.7

3 3 50.0

86.2

22 1 95.7

3 3 50.0

86.2

22 1 95.7

3 3 50.0

86.2

Observed

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Barthel Index

Overall Percentage

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Barthel Index

Overall Percentage

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Barthel Index

Overall Percentage

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Barthel Index

Overall Percentage

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Barthel Index

Overall Percentage

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Barthel Index

Overall Percentage

Total

Berat /Mandiri

Barthel Index

Overall Percentage

Step 1

Step 2

Step 3

Step 4

Step 5

Step 6

Step 7


Barthel Index Percentage

Correct

Predicted

The cut v alue is .500a.

82

Variables in the Equation

-.056 .077 .526 1 .468 .946 .814 1.099

.966 1.619 .356 1 .551 2.628 .110 62.809

-.314 2.069 .023 1 .879 .731 .013 42.149

1.709 1.573 1.180 1 .277 5.523 .253 120.615

2.874 1.830 2.466 1 .116 17.711 .490 640.149

-2.915 1.594 3.344 1 .067 .054 .002 1.233

-.379 2.704 .020 1 .888 .684 .003 136.951

.000 .030 .000 1 .988 1.000 .943 1.062

-1.846 8.587 .046 1 .830 .158

-.055 .076 .529 1 .467 .946 .815 1.099

.968 1.619 .357 1 .550 2.632 .110 62.798

-.321 2.008 .026 1 .873 .725 .014 37.127

1.711 1.568 1.190 1 .275 5.532 .256 119.558

2.873 1.829 2.469 1 .116 17.693 .491 637.215

-2.910 1.564 3.462 1 .063 .054 .003 1.168

-.391 2.596 .023 1 .880 .676 .004 109.608

-1.816 8.346 .047 1 .828 .163

-.056 .076 .533 1 .465 .946 .815 1.098

.904 1.544 .343 1 .558 2.470 .120 50.923

-.277 2.012 .019 1 .890 .758 .015 39.103

1.711 1.570 1.188 1 .276 5.537 .255 120.115

2.881 1.827 2.488 1 .115 17.834 .497 639.751

-2.922 1.560 3.507 1 .061 .054 .003 1.146

-2.506 6.831 .135 1 .714 .082

-.058 .073 .631 1 .427 .944 .818 1.089

.971 1.463 .440 1 .507 2.640 .150 46.428

1.716 1.558 1.213 1 .271 5.561 .262 117.840

2.877 1.812 2.522 1 .112 17.768 .510 619.415

-2.913 1.544 3.559 1 .059 .054 .003 1.120

-2.809 6.317 .198 1 .656 .060

-.061 .077 .621 1 .431 .941 .809 1.095

1.479 1.415 1.093 1 .296 4.387 .274 70.184

2.374 1.587 2.238 1 .135 10.742 .479 240.989

-2.719 1.463 3.452 1 .063 .066 .004 1.161

-.062 4.908 .000 1 .990 .940

1.553 1.427 1.183 1 .277 4.725 .288 77.506

2.322 1.586 2.144 1 .143 10.193 .456 228.086

-3.188 1.414 5.088 1 .024 .041 .003 .658

-2.842 3.351 .719 1 .396 .058

2.455 1.511 2.639 1 .104 11.645 .602 225.157

-3.075 1.321 5.420 1 .020 .046 .003 .615

-.608 2.441 .062 1 .803 .545

Usia

sex

Hipertensi

DM

Hiperkolesterolemia

Obesitas

SAH

Vol_perdarahan

Constant

Step

1a

Usia

sex

Hipertensi

DM

Hiperkolesterolemia

Obesitas

SAH

Constant

Step

2a

Usia

sex

Hipertensi

DM

Hiperkolesterolemia

Obesitas

Constant

Step

3a

Usia

sex

DM

Hiperkolesterolemia

Obesitas

Constant

Step

4a

Usia

DM

Hiperkolesterolemia

Obesitas

Constant

Step

5a

DM

Hiperkolesterolemia

Obesitas

Constant

Step

6a

Hiperkolesterolemia

Obesitas

Constant

Step

7a

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

95.0% C.I. for EXP(B)

Variable(s) entered on step 1: Usia, sex, Hipertensi, DM, Hiperkolesterolemia, Obesitas, SAH, Vol_perdarahan.a.

83

Lampiran 5. Biodata Mahasiswa

Identitas

Nama : Ahda Amila Sholiha

NIM : 22010112130198

Tempat/tanggal lahir : Grobogan, 22 November 1993

Jenis kelamin : Perempuan

Alamat : Jalan Pondok Dustira 234A Sukamaju Padasuka RT9

RW6 Cimahi Tengah 40526

Nomor telepon : (022)-6610418

Nomor HP : 087832840125

e-mail : [email protected]

Riwayat Pendidikan Formal

1. SD : MI Asih Putera Lulus tahun : 2005

2. SMP : SMP Negeri 2 Cimahi Lulus tahun : 2008

3. SMA : SMA Negeri 2 Cimahi Lulus tahun : 2011

4. FK UNDIP : Masuk tahun : 2012

Keanggotaan Organisasi

1. Eksekutif muda EKOBIS BEM KM FK UNDIP tahun 2014

2. Staf departemen KSKI ROHIS KU UNDIP tahun 2013 sampai 2014

3. Anggota KSM KU UNDIP tahun 2013 sampai 2014

DAFTAR PUSTAKA -...

Documents

Transcript of DAFTAR PUSTAKA -...