Compare Efficiency Shannon, Shanon Fano, Huffman, and Arithmatic Code

7
Oka Mahendra NIM: 211123009 PR Komunikasi Multimedia IT Telkom HOMEWORK #1 Suatu sumber S={a,b,c,d,#} dg probabilitas P={0.4, 0.2, 0.2, 0.1, 0.1}. a. Cari codeword utk masing-masing simbol dg metoda (i) Shannon, (ii) Shannon-Fano dan (iii) Huffman Coding dan hitung efisiensinya. b. Hitung Efisiensi dari masing-masing skim pengkodean diatas, mana yang lebih baik? c. Kodekan message cab# dengan metoda Arithmetic Coding Jawab: a. (i) Shannon x i p i l i Cum P i codeword a 0. 4 2 0 0.0000 0 00 b 0. 2 3 0.4 0.0110 0 011 c 0. 2 3 0.6 0.1001 1 100 d 0. 1 4 0.8 0.1100 1 1100 # 0. 1 4 0.9 0.1110 0 1110

description

Compare Efficiency Shannon, Shanon Fano, Huffman, and Arithmatic Code

Transcript of Compare Efficiency Shannon, Shanon Fano, Huffman, and Arithmatic Code

Page 1: Compare Efficiency Shannon, Shanon Fano, Huffman, and Arithmatic Code

Oka MahendraNIM: 211123009PR Komunikasi MultimediaIT Telkom

HOMEWORK #1

Suatu sumber S={a,b,c,d,#} dg probabilitas P={0.4, 0.2, 0.2, 0.1, 0.1}. a. Cari codeword utk masing-masing simbol dg metoda (i)

Shannon, (ii) Shannon-Fano dan (iii) Huffman Coding dan hitung efisiensinya.

b. Hitung Efisiensi dari masing-masing skim pengkodean diatas, mana yang lebih baik?

c. Kodekan message cab# dengan metoda Arithmetic Coding

Jawab:

a.

(i) Shannon

xi pi li Cum Pi codeworda 0.4 2 0 0.00000 00b 0.2 3 0.4 0.01100 011c 0.2 3 0.6 0.10011 100d 0.1 4 0.8 0.11001 1100# 0.1 4 0.9 0.11100 1110

EntropyH(s) = 0.4 lg (1/0.4) + 0.2 lg (1/0.2) + 0.2 lg (1/0.2) + 0.1 lg (1/0.1) + 0.1 lg (1/0.1)

= 2.122

Panjang Kode rata-rata Lsh = 0.4 * 2 + 0.2 * 3 + 0.2*3 + 0.1 * 4 + 0.1*4

= 2.8

Efisiensi = H(s) / Lsh = 2.122 / 2.8 = 75.8 %

Page 2: Compare Efficiency Shannon, Shanon Fano, Huffman, and Arithmatic Code

(ii) Shannon-Fano #1

Codewordxi Codeword pi lia 0 0.4 1b 10 0.2 2c 110 0.2 3d 1110 0.1 4# 1111 0.1 4

Panjang Kode rata-rata Lsh = 0.4 * 1 + 0.2 * 2 + 0.2*3 + 0.1 * 4 + 0.1*4

= 2.2

Efisiensi = H(s) / Lsh = 2.122 / 2.2 = 96.5 %

d0.1

a0.4

b0.2

c0.2

#0.1

0 1

0 1

01

0 1

Page 3: Compare Efficiency Shannon, Shanon Fano, Huffman, and Arithmatic Code

Shannon-Fano #2

Codewordxi Codeword pi lia 00 0.4 2b 01 0.2 2c 10 0.2 2d 110 0.1 3# 111 0.1 3

Panjang Kode rata-rata Lsh = 0.4 * 2 + 0.2 * 2 + 0.2*2 + 0.1*3 + 0.1*3

= 2.2

Efisiensi = H(s) / Lsh = 2.122 / 2.2 = 96.5 %

b0.2

c0.2a

0.4

d0.1

#0.1

01

0 10

1

0 1

Page 4: Compare Efficiency Shannon, Shanon Fano, Huffman, and Arithmatic Code

(iii) Huffman Coding

0.1(#) 0.1(d) 0.2(c) 0.2(b) 0.4(a)

0.2(#,d) 0.2(c) 0.2(b) 0.4(a)

0.4 ((#,d)c) 0.2(b) 0.4(a)

0.6 (((#d,c),b) 0,4(a)

# 0.1

d 0.1

c 0.2

b 0.2

a 0.4

Codewordxi Codeword pi lia 1 0.4 1b 01 0.2 2c 001 0.2 3d 0001 0.1 4# 0000 0.1 4

Panjang Kode rata-rata Lsh = 0.4 * 1 + 0.2 * 2 + 0.2*3 + 0.1 * 4 + 0.1*4

= 2.2

Efisiensi = H(s) / Lsh = 2.122 / 2.2 = 96.5 %

0.2

0.4

0.60

1

0

1

0

1

0

1

Page 5: Compare Efficiency Shannon, Shanon Fano, Huffman, and Arithmatic Code

b. Efisiensi koding

Koding EfisiensiShannon 75.8%Shannon Fano 96.5%Huffman 96.5%

Untuk kasus ini, koding terbaik dengan efisiensi tertinggi adalah Huffman dan Shannon-Fano.

c. Arithmetic Coding dari pesan “cab#”

Codeword adalah sembarang bilangan dalam interval 0.6464 – 0.6480,biasanya digunakan batas kiri = 0.6464 atau rata-rata arithmetic = 0.6472

0

1

0.4

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.6

0.8

0.68

0.6

0.68

0.632

0.648

0.632

0.648

0.6464