1. Opening (Pembukaan)

18

Click here to load reader

description

hasil dari intetrnet.. silhakan di share.. saya lupa alamat sumbernya

Transcript of 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

Page 1: 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

THE FLOUTING OF IMPLICATURE IN THE KING’S SPEECH MOVIE

(PRAGMATIC APPROACH)

A Thesis

Submitted to the Faculty of Letters University

in Partial Fulfillment for the Acquisition of Sarjana Degree

in English Department

By

MONITA INDAYARTI

F21108034

Makassar

2012

i

Page 2: 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

SKRIPSI

THE FLOUTING OF IMPLICATURE IN THE KING’S SPEECH MOVIE

(PRAGMATIC APPROACH)

MONITA INDAYARTIF21108034

Telah dipertahankan didepan Panitia Ujian SkripsiPada hari Kamis, 24 Mei 2012 dan dinyatakan telah memenuhi syarat.

Menyetujui,KomisiPembimbing,

Ketua Sekretaris

Drs. Simon Sitoto, M.A Dr. Hj. Sukmawaty, M.Hum.NIP. 196110221989031003 NIP. 196010121987032002

DekanFakultasSastra KetuaJurusanSastraInggrisUniversitasHasanuddin FakultasSastra UNHAS

Prof. Drs. H. BurhanuddinArafah, M.Hum. Ph.D Drs. Husain Hasyim, M.Hum.NIP. 1965 0303 1990 02 1001 NIP. 1961 1028 1987 03 1003

ii

Page 3: 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

Universitas Hasanuddin

Fakultas Sastrax

Jurusan Sastra Inggris

Sesuai dengan surat tugas Dekan Fakultas Sastra Universitas Hasanuddin

nomor: 330/H4.10.1/PP.27/2012 tanggal 25 Januari 2012. Kami menyatakan dengan

ini menerima dan menyetujui skripsi ini untuk dirumuskan ke panitia ujian skripsi

Jurusan Sastra Inggris Fakultas Sastra Universitas Hasanuddin.

Makassar, Mei 2012

Konsultan I Konsultan II

Drs. Simon Sitoto, M.A Dr. Hj. Sukmawaty, M.Hum.

NIP. 196110221989031003 NIP. 196010121987032002

Menyetujui

a.n. Dekan

Ketua Jurusan Sastra Inggris

Drs. Husain Hasyim, M.Hum.

NIP. 196110281987031003

iii

Page 4: 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

UNIVERSITAS HASANUDDIN

FAKULTAS SASTRA

Pada hari ini, tanggal 24 Mei 2012, Panitia ujian skripsi menerima dengan

baik skripsi yang berjudul:

THE FLOUTING OF IMPLICATURE IN THE KING’S SPEECH MOVIE

untuk memenuhi salah satu syarat ujian akhir guna memperoleh gelar sarjana Jurusan

Sastra Inggris program studi Kebahasaan pada Fakultas Sastra Universitas

Hasanuddin.

Makassar, 24 Mei 2012

Panitia Ujian Skripsi:

1. Drs. Simon Sitoto,M.A Ketua (………………….)

2. Dr. Hj. Sukmawaty,M.Hum Sekretaris (………………….)

3. Drs. Stanislaus Sandarupa,M.A,Ph.D Penguji I (………………….)

4. Dra. Marleiny Radjuni,M.Ed Penguji II (………………….)

5. Drs. Simon Sitoto,M.A Konsultan I (………………….)

6. Dr. Hj. Sukmawaty,M.Hum Konsultan II (………………….)

iv

Page 5: 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

v

This Thesis is Dedicated for My Beloved Parents :

Ir. Hafid andHj. Mastura S.Pd

Page 6: 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First of all, the writer would like to express her uppermost gratitude and pray

to ALLAH SWT, the Almighty and the God of humankind who has blessed and

guide the whole life of the writer, and gives high motivation especially in finishing

this thesis. The writer hopes that the Almighty Allah always blesses all of us and

peace of Almighty Allah upon, the noblest messenger, Prophet Muhammad SAW.

Unlimited thanks are dedicated her parents, Ir. Hafid and Hj. Mastura

S.Pd, for their loves, encouragements, patience, support, advices, motivations,

praying and anything during the period of her study.

In completing this thesis, the writer has found many problems. However,

those problems could be solved with support and help people surrounding the writer.

Particularly for the following persons the writer feels an unlimited gratitude:

1. High appreciation from the writer goes to Drs. Simon Sitoto, M.A , the first

consultant of the writer and Dr. Hj. Sukmawaty, M.Hum, the second consultant

of the writer, for their helpful guidance, correction, and suggestion in this thesis

writing.

2. Grateful acknowledgement is also conveyed to the Dean and all deputy deans,

the Head of English Department, the Academic advisor and to all members of

teaching staff for their help in completing this writing.

vi

Page 7: 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

3. Deepest gratitude also goes to the all of writer’s big family, uncle, aunties, sister,

nieces, cousin, for their help and encouragements to the writer when the writing

this thesis.

4. Sincere thanks are expressed to writer’s beloved friends “The Kongkalikong”:

Nur Melansari, Rezky Restiana Rahmah and Musfirah. Thanks for support, care,

memorable moment, advises, wisdom, hopes, madness and laugh that we’ve

shared in the joy and sorrow.

5. Special thanks to Muhammad Ahadismal, for his care, help, support, lesson and

sharing to the writer about many things.

6. Big thanks for all of writer’s friends especially for all of Grotesque 08’, Ade

Islamiah, Masdyanto (Alm), Mufrirah (Alm), Hilda, bunda ‘Ana’, Tiwi, Fitri,

Faura and others which cannot mention their name all, thanks for the supports,

help and memories guys.

Since nobody if perfect so is a written work. The writer admits this work is

still far ways from perfectness thus she extremely welcome to any critics and

suggestion.

Makassar, 05 Mei 2012

Writer

vii

Page 8: 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE …………………………………………………………………………………i

LEGITIMACY ……………………………………………………………………….ii

AGREEMENT……………………………………………………………………… iii

APPROVAL ………………………………………………………………………... iv

DEDICATION………………………………………………………………………. v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ………………………………………………………...... vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………. viii

ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………. x

CHAPTER

I INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………. 1

A. Context…………………………………………………………………...1B. Research Question………………………………………………………. 5C. Objectivity of Writing…………………………………………….…….. 5D. Rational of Writing… …………………………………………………... 6E. Significance of Writing………………………………………………..... 6

II THEORETICAL BACKGROUND………………………………………..……... 7

1.2.

A. Previous Study …………………………………………………….…...7B. Literary Review………………………………………………………... 8

1. Definition of Pragmatic……………………………………….......... 82. Definition of Implicature…………………………………………… 93. Grice’s Theory of Co-operative Principle………………………… 104. Theory of Politeness Principle………………………………......... 135. Discourse Analysis………………………………………………... 14

C. Theoretical Stance ………………………………………….………... 15

III METHODOLOGY ……………………………………………………………... 20

viii

Page 9: 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

1.2.3.

A. Library Research ………………………………………………………….. 20B. Field Research …………………………………………………………….. 20C. Methodology of Analyzing Data ………………………………………… 20D. Population and Sample……………………………………………………. 21

1. Population………………………………………;…………………….. 212. Sample………………………………………….…………………....... 21

IV PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA……………………………… 23

A. Synopsis of The King’s Speech Movie…………………………………… 23B. Data Presentation and Analysis………………………………………........ 25

V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION………………………………………...... 50

A. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………. 50B. Suggestion………………………………………………………………….. 51

BIBLIOGRAPHY …………………………………………………………………. 52

APPENDIX

ix

Page 10: 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

ABSTRACT

MONITA INDAYARTI. 2012. The Flouting of Implicature in “The King’s Speech” (Pragmatic Approach) (Supervised by Simon Sitoto and Sukmawati).

This study aimed at describing the flouting of implicature that implied in each utterance that became the main data, and explaining reason why the speakers violate it.

In analyzing data, the writer used descriptive method. The data were collected by library and field research used purposive sampling method. The data were analyzed using a pragmatic approach. The data related to the flouting of implicatures were elaborated clearly by using cooperative principle and politeness principle.

The results of the analysis show that in the English movie entitled “The King’s Speech” the speakers tend to flout the implicature in their utterances. Using Gricean analysis, the implicatures of the utterances of the speakers flout the conversational maxim: 10 utterances flout the maxim of relevance, 4 utterances flout the maxim of quality, 4 utterances flout the maxim of quantity, and 4 utterances flout the maxim manner. Using Lakoff’s analysis, the utterances of the speakers flout maxim of politeness principle: 7 utterances flout do not impose, 1 utterance flouts give the hearer option and 11 utterances flout make the addressee feel good. Besides, the results also show that the speakers violate the maxims of cooperative principle because they assume the hearer already understand what they mean, they want to hide what their actual mean and make their utterance looks more polite; and the speakers violate the maxims of politeness principle because they want to express their feelings to the hearers of the situation they face, to ensure their wishes and intention to the hearer because they think their wishes are very important.

x

Page 11: 1. Opening (Pembukaan)

ABSTRAK

MONITA INDAYARTI. 2012. The Flouting of Implicature in “The King’s Speech” (Pendekatan Pragmatik) (Dibimbing oleh Simon Sitoto dan Sukmawati).

Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk memaparkan tentang pelanggaran implikatur yang terjadi dalam setiap tuturan yang kemudian menjadi data utama, dan menjelaskan tentang alasan mengapa para tokoh melanggarnya.

Dalam menganalisis data, penulis menggunakan metode deskriptif. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka dan lapangan dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Kemudian data yang berkaitan dengan pelanggaran implikatur dipaparkan secara jelas dengan menggunakan prinsip kerjasama dan prinsip kesopanan.

Hasil dari analisis menunjukan bahwa dalam film yang berjudul “The King’s Speech”, para tokoh cenderung melanggar implikatur dalam tuturannya. Dengan menggunakan teori Grice, para tokoh melanggar maxim percakapan: 10 tuturan melanggar maxim of hubungan, 4 tuturan melanggar maxim of kualitas, 4 tuturan melanggar maxim kuantitas, and 4 tuturan melanggar maxim cara. Dengan menggunakan teory Lakoff, para tokoh melanggar maxim dari prinsip kesopanan: 7 tuturan melanggar maxim jangan memaksa, 1 tuturan melanggar maxim berikan pilihan kepada pendengar dan 11 tuturan melanggar maxim buat pendengar merasa nyaman. Disamping itu, hasil juga menunjukan bahwa para tokoh melanggar maxim dari prinsip kerjasama karena mereka berasumsi bahwa pendengar telah mengerti apa yang mereka maksud, mereka ingin meyembunyikan maksud yang sebenarnya dan membuat perkataan mereka tampak sopan; dan para tokoh melanggar maxim dari prinsip kesopanan karena mereka ingin mengungkapkan perasaan mereka kepada pendengar terhadap situasi yang mereka hadapi, dan mereka ingin meyakinkan pendengar tentang maksud dan keinginan mereka karena mereka berpikir apa yang mereka inginkan itu sangat penting.

xi