Post on 02-May-2023
Distress, wellbeing and war: qualitative analyses of civilian interviews from north eastern Sri Lanka,
Intervention 2009, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 204 - 222
Distress, wellbeing and war:qualitative analyses of civilianinterviews from north easternSri Lanka
NuwanJayawickreme, ErandaJayawickreme,Michelle A. Goonasekera & Edna B. Foa
This paper outlines a methodology for the devel-
opment of culturally sensitive measures of war
problems (including psychological and behavioural
problems) and wellbeing for use among refugees
a¡ected by the recently concluded civil war in
Sri Lanka. These measures were derived from
qualitative data collected from individuals living
in areas a¡ected by the civil war. The authors
utilised a qualitative data analysis methodology,
involving both open coding and thematic analysis.
Examples of frequently coded nodes and question-
naire items that were developed from them are
presented, and next steps (validation of the
measures) are discussed.
Keywords: cultural psychiatry, culture,positive psychology, qualitative analysis,scale development, Sri Lanka, trauma, war,wellbeing
IntroductionThe war trauma su¡ered by communities innorth eastern Sri Lanka is considerable. In2006,more than 2500 individualswere killedin the con£ict and 200,000 individuals weremade to £ee their homes due to violencebetween the Sri Lankan government andthe Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam(LTTE) (International Crisis Group,2006). The psychosocial needs of these com-munities are great; the longstanding e¡ects
204
of the civil war have resulted in signi¢cantadverse changes at the individual, familyand the societal levels (Somasundaram,2007). Thus, developing suitable psychoso-cial interventions that alleviate the su¡eringof war a¡ected Sri Lankans is a necessary,if complex, task that involves the con-sideration of both the individual and thecommunity (Galappatti,2003).The develop-ment of culturally sensitive assessment toolsand identi¢cation of variables that bothencourage and impede wellbeing (in partthrough our work) will enable policymakersand representatives of nongovernmentalorganisations (NGOs) to develop psycho-social interventions that better address theneeds of the communities.The ¢rst step in the development of anypotentially e¡ective intervention should bethe development of culturally and psycho-metrically valid measurement instrumentsfor the purpose of assessing the nature andextent of distress of the community in ques-tion. Psychosocial caregivers in Sri Lankashouldbe able to use this work to tailor inter-ventions that speci¢cally address the com-munity’s problems, build on its strengthsand compensate for its weaknesses. Oneimplication of this would be that psycho-social interventions to assist individualscould target a particular dimension iden-ti¢ed by these measures.
Jayawickreme et al.
Cultural psychiatry and the assessment of
psychiatric disorders
Over the last 30 years the ¢eld of clinicalpsychology has identi¢ed and systemati-cally studied posttraumatic stress syndrome(PTSD), a posttraumatic syndrome with aspeci¢c set of diagnostic criteria that is dis-tinct from other types of psychopathology.The disorder is characterised by the pre-sence of three symptom clusters followingan event that is experienced as traumatic:re-experiencing; avoidance; and hyper-arousal symptoms. Research thus far demon-strates that PTSD is associatedwith avarietyof problems including physical health pro-blems and alcohol/substance abuse (Keane,Marshall, & Taft, 2006). However, much ofthe researchvalidating PTSDas a diagnosticcategory has been carried out in Western,industrialised, developed countries. Thus,howPTSDvaries across cultures is currentlyonly vaguely understood. Since culturaldi¡erences are tied to variations in the socialconstruction of reality ^ which is in turnin£uenced by cultural di¡erences in cogni-tion and the experience and expression ofemotion ^ the perception of what is trau-matic experience, as well as the individualand social responses, can conceivably varygreatly (Friedman & Marsella, 1996; vonPeter, 2008). A recent meta-analysis of 181epidemiological studies, including studiesin developing countries, reported an unad-justed, weighted prevalence rate of 30,6%for PTSD and 30,8% for depression. How-ever,manymethodological problems remain(Steel, Chey, Silove, Marnane, Bryant &vanOmmeren, 2009). In addition, the factthe symptoms associated with the disordercan be identi¢ed in every setting does notnecessarily mean that PTSD is similar inall settings. It could be that those symptomsare not indicative of distress. Expressionsof psychological distress are determined
largely by culture (Kleinman, 1986). Whatare identi¢ed as symptoms of illness, andtherefore indicators of distress, in one cul-tural context may not be applicable inanother context. According to Kleinman(1981), to assume otherwise would be to com-mit the categorical fallacy, where ‘the rei¢cationof a nosological category developed for a particular
group. . .is then applied to members of another cul-
ture for whom it lacks coherence, and its validity
has not been established’ (Kleinman,1987). It isclear that identifying these local ‘idioms ofdistress’ is necessary if one is to construct validinstruments for the assessment of posttraumapsychological distress, so as to identifythose who may need interventions (Keane,Kaloupek, & Weathers, 1996; de Jong, 2002).The studyof local idioms of illness (andwell-being) in speci¢c communities is an import-ant endeavour, since expressions of illness,or wellbeing, stem from a speci¢c value orbelief orientation (Lopez & Guarnaccia,2000). Understanding the acceptable meansof communicating distress and wellbeingin a particular community is essential todevelop a culturally competent model ofmental health (Osterman & de Jong, 2007).Such a study must use qualitative, epidemio-logical and (in the case of psychologicaldistress) clinical researchmethods, to under-stand how the social world interacts withthe individual’s physical and psychologicalprocesses. In the last decade, researchershave begun to utilise this cultural psychiatryapproach to identify local idioms of psycho-logical distress with a view towards to devel-oping assessment of psychopathology andsuitable interventions (Miller, Kulkarni, &Kushner, 2006; de Jong, Komproe,VanOm-meren, El Masri, Araya, Khaled, van dePut & Somasundaram, 2001). Consistentwith this research model, the authorsused qualitative data as the basis of ourinstruments.
205
Distress, wellbeing and war: qualitative analyses of civilian interviews from north eastern Sri Lanka
Intervention 2009, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 204 - 222
Positive psychology and the mental health of
displaced populations
During the past decade, the emerging¢eld of positive psychology (Seligman &Csikszentmihalyi, 2000) has supported andstimulated research aimed at redressing theimbalance between psychopathology anddisease, relative to human strengths andwellbeing (Linley et al., 2006). This hasfurthered the ¢eld’s goal of creating ‘a psy-
chology of positive human functioning. . .that
achieves a scienti¢c understanding and e¡ective
interventions to build thriving individuals, families
and communities’ (Seligman, 2002).The domination of the ‘medical model’ hasemphasised the diagnosis of psychiatric dis-orders over the fact that refugees are normalindividuals with strengths and resourcesthat have been caught in abnormal situ-ations. In refugee mental health researchthis has led to at least two serious limitationsin our understanding of their wellbeing.For one, some researchers have argued thatthis research paradigm obscures the factthat most refugees do not show evidence ofa diagnosable psychiatric disorder, and eventhose that do, nevertheless function e¡ec-tively (Summer¢eld, 2005; Miller et al.,2006). There is little insight on how mostrefugees continue to function adaptively inthe wake of extreme situations, and whichresources and strengths facilitate such func-tioning. This is mainly due to the focus onconcepts of loss, separation, stress andtrauma, all of which emphasise what is lack-ing for refugees to experiencewellbeing.Thislimitation contributes in no small way tothe second issue: most disorder focusedinterventions designed to alleviate psycho-logical distress and promote psychologicalwellbeing ignore the many wellsprings ofwellbeing that refugees may rely on tomain-tain an adequate level of psychologicalfunctioning. Far from being irrelevant,
206
therefore, it would seem that positive psy-chology has the potential to make a seriousand important contribution to the researchon displaced populations. As Ry¡ andSinger (2002) have pointed out, positivehuman functioning is most remarkablewhen seen in contexts of signi¢cant lifechallenge and adversity (Stein, Seedat,Iverson & Wessely, 2007). The capacity toboth prevail in the face of challenge and toexperience personal growth as a result ofsuch challenges has received increasedattention following the advent of positivepsychology (Bonnano, 2004).With regard to wellbeing, a consistent ¢nd-ing in the literature is that the characteristicsand resources valued by societies also corre-late with happiness (Lyubomirsky, King, &Diener, 2005). This means that conceptionsof wellness can vary by culture, as cultureis potentially a major force constructingindividuals’ understanding of happinessandconsequently their subjective experienceof it (Lu & Gilmour, 2004). Understandinghow these individuals conceptualise happi-ness andwellbeing, andwhich resources theyassociate with wellbeing, could have veryimportant consequences for understandingthe coping mechanisms individuals use intimes of war and con£ict. Resources such asself-esteem, optimism, personal control anda sense of meaning have all been shown toact as a bu¡er against stressful life events(Taylor, Kemeny, Reed, Bower & Gruene-wald, 2000). Additionally, while people canadapt relatively well to isolated incidents oftrauma, adapting to a long term situationinvolving signi¢cant resource loss (Hobfoll,Johnson, Ennis & Jackson, 2003) may bemuch harder. However, the same factors thatserve to bolster these individuals’ wellbeing(material goods, social relationships orpersonal resources) may also serve a pro-tective role in preserving their subjective
Jayawickreme et al.
quality of life in the face of adverse life con-ditions. Identifying the resources andstrengths at work in uplifting these individ-uals’ wellbeing and resiliency wouldenhance the ability of psychosocial care-givers to create e¡ective interventions. Inthis context, the development of a culture-sensitive wellbeing measure that identi¢esand measures these resources is an import-ant project (Fernando, 2008).
MethodsThe authors used qualitative data collectedthrough the Social Policy Analysis andResearch Centre (SPARC) at the Universityof Colombo, Sri Lanka, in collaborationwith theAsia Foundation under the ‘Reducingthe E¡ects and Incidence of Torture’ (RESISTProgramme) as the basis of our instru-ments. The RESIST Programme, under theguidance of Dr. Jon Hubbard, ResearchDirector for the Center for Victims of
Breakdown by district
Batticaloa Ja¡na M
AWPI 20 263ACI 12 179
Breakdown by gender
Male
AWPI 370ACI 317
Breakdown by age
21^30 31^45 46^
AWPI 232 244 8ACI 267 224 9
Torture (Minneapolis, MN), gathered thisqualitative data on local concepts of well-being, coping mechanisms and war relateddistress by having trained interviewers goup individuals on the street and ask if theyhad time to answer a few questions. Thesedata were collected in areas a¡ected bywar in northern and eastern Sri Lankain 2006.The interviews The qualitative dataset con-sists of 604 copies of the Adult War Problems
Interview (AWPI) and 622 copies of theAdult Competencies Interview (ACI) (both aresemi-structured interviews developed byRESIST), collected from individuals livingin thewar a¡ected north andeast Sri Lanka,during 2006. Tamil language data wascollected from ¢ve districts,1 and bothgenders were equally represented in thesample. Many of the participants werebetween the age of 21 and 45 (see tablebelow).2
annar Trincomalee Vavuniya
109 7 205143 14 274
Female N/A
209 25292 13
60 61^75 76^99 N/A
5 19 0 246 23 2 10
207
Distress, wellbeing and war: qualitative analyses of civilian interviews from north eastern Sri Lanka
Intervention 2009, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 204 - 222
In the Adult War Problems semi-structuredinterview, interviewers asked participants18 years or older to think of two people(one male and one female) they knew whohave had problems due to the war,and to listtheir top four problems. The interviewerwrote down their answers, which consistedof a single phrase for each problem. Theywere also asked to identify themain problemfor eachof these same individuals.Theywerenext asked why they thought some peoplewere negatively a¡ected by the war, whereas
208
others were not. The interviewers wrote d-own up to four responses to this question;each response consisted of a sentence ortwo. Lastly, participants were asked whatcould be done to help those who are su¡er-ing. Again, the interviewers wrote down upto four responses, with each response consist-ing of a sentence or two. As each question-naire had information on two individuals(one male and one female), we had AWPIdata from 604 men and women (1208responses in total).
Jayawickreme et al.
In the ACI semi-structured interview,participants aged 18 years or older wereasked to think of two people they knewwho are doing well, and to list the topfour attributes of doing well in life. Thesedata consisted of a single phrase for eachattribute. They were also asked to identifythe main attribute for each of the sameindividuals. They were next asked why they
20
thought some people were doing well,whereas others were not, and why that maybe the case. The interviewers wrote downup to four responses to this question, witheach response consisting of a sentence ortwo. As each interview had data from onemale and one female, interview data from622 men and women (1244 in total) wascollected.
9
Distress, wellbeing and war: qualitative analyses of civilian interviews from north eastern Sri Lanka
Intervention 2009, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 204 - 222
Interviewing procedure Sixty sta¡ members ofthe Family Rehabilitation Centre (FRC)and Shanthiham, both non pro¢t organis-ations that provide psychosocial services,conducted the interviews. Two workshopsconducted in Vavuniya and Colombo inJune 2006 were organised to train inter-viewers in administering the AWPI andACI. Dr. Jon Hubbard supervised thesesessions. Detailed instructions regardingthe interviewing process were provided,including a discussion of ethical consider-ations of interviewing, understanding andadjusting to local norms, techniques forrecording interviews and for handling sensi-tive information.The importance of gettingspeci¢c, detailed answers to questions posed,
210
and the necessity of verbatim recordingwas stressed. Training emphasised buildingrapport, promoting a sense of con¢dential-ity, and active listening techniques. It wasalso stressed that interviewing should bedone in a way that all adult age categories,di¡erent communities, and both sexes wererepresented (The Asia Foundation, 2006).It should also be noted that the workshopswere designed as a two-way informationsharing process, and all the participantsinteractedwith each other. Participantswerepaired and practiced interviewing, withone person playing the role of interviewer,the other playing the role of the interviewee.After one round, the roles were reversed.Following each practice session, participants
Jayawickreme et al.
discussed ways to improve the quality of theinterviews. After three practice sessions onthe ACI and AWPI, a pair of interviewersperformed the interviewing process in frontof other participants for critique. Strategiesfor improving the interviews were analysed,and factors such as facial expressions, show-ing empathy, noncommittal approach tothe responses, and timemanagement duringinterviewing were considered. All parti-cipants were asked for consent before eachinterview (The Asia Foundation, 2006)3.Data analysis These datawere codedutilisingthe NVivo coding software (QSR Inter-national, 2006), and involved the analysisof two separate translations (Tamil andEnglish) of theAWPIandACIdata.The¢rststep was to utilise the open coding method(Strauss, 1987; Berg, 2006) with a viewtowards systematically identifying andpossibly extracting the main themes/topics/issues. To this end, the authors countedwords, themes, items, concepts and seman-tics. Strauss (1987) has outlined four basicguidelines for conducting open coding,which the authors followed:
1) A
sk the data a speci¢c and consistent setof questions2) A
nalyse the data minutely 3) F requently interrupt the coding to writea theoretical note
4) N ever assume the analytic relevance ofany traditional variable such as age,sex, social class, and so on, until the datahave shown it to be relevant
Following Berg (2006) in open coding, theauthors carefully and minutely examinedthe data line-by-line and word-by-word todetermine tentative concepts and categoriesthat ¢t. These concepts and categories werebased on common themes and experiencesrelated to psychological distress and well-
being. These were drawn solely from thedatabase, with minimum in£uence ofprior conceptions of trauma and wellbeing(Guarnaccia, Rivera, Franco & Neighbors,1996, for a similar method).Following this, the authors engaged inthematic analysis (also known as axial coding)of the data. Thematic analysis is a dynamicprocess where a master scheme is developedto organise the data under major themesand subthemes. This analysis involves theinteraction of two processes: speci¢cation ofthe content characteristics (basic contentelements) being examined and applicationof explicit rules for identifyingand recordingthese characteristics.When coding the ACIdata, the number of entries in each categorywas counted to allow for the demonstrationof magnitude. This is important, because itwould allow the possibility of examiningthe number of items in each category, whichin turnwould help to identify which conceptsand categories were most salient in the data.The AWPI data was not coded using thismethodology as the authors wanted toinclude all psychological and behaviouralproblems irrespective of their base rates inthe general population.To get a sense of the type of data used,some examples from the two interviews arebelow:
Results: Penn/RESIST/Peradeniya (PRP)War
Problems Questionnaire
Open coding of the AWPI data revealedthree preliminary groups of concepts:traumatic events, war-related generalproblems, andwar related psychological andbehavioural problems.Thematic analysis of the qualitative datapointed towards the existence of the samethree distinct clusters, but also with distinctsubclusters:
211
Examples from the AWPI
Question asked:What kind of problems is this person having because of their war experiences—four
responses for one man and one women they knew
Batticaloa Man: Lost leg due to land mine, so unmarried; loss of father, so worries;unable to travel
Woman: Unable to walk because back bone is damaged, so need others helpfor all activities; unable to do any job; unable to travel desirable places
Ja¡na Man: Cheated; displaced from own village; no money; question aboutchildren’s future
Woman: Lack of income from husband; lack of educational facilities forchildren; repression of children; frustration
Mannar Man: Refugee life; no interest to ¢nd job, because getting help fromnongovernmental organisation; unable to go to particular places;unauthorised relationship
Woman: No employment opportunities; lack of security; loss of relatives;a¡ected state of mind
Trincomalee Man: Loss of eyes; dependant on his wife; fear; unable to see anythingin world
Woman: Broken leg through army torture, so unable to walk; cannotescape natural disaster like tsunami
Vavuniya Man: Lost of agricultural lands; poor economic condition; doesn’t havecourage to live alone; fear of others
Woman: Lives alone; di⁄culties interacting with others; blocks in self e¡ort;lack of economic facilities
Examples from the ACI
Question asked: In what ways is this person doing well—four responses for one man and one woman
they knew
Batticaloa Man: Can ful¢l daily requirements because he is moderately rich man; heinteracts with others good in good manner in any problem; goodfamily background, parents are good; he believes in God and praysregularly
Woman: Head of family, ful¢ls husbands’ role, children’s requirements;she maintains good relationship with relatives and others; she doesn’tcare other’s mistakes; believes in God, and prays with family regularly
Ja¡na Man: Financial status; children are living at London; happiness in life;doing actively
Distress, wellbeing and war: qualitative analyses of civilian interviews from north eastern Sri Lanka
Intervention 2009, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 204 - 222
212
Woman: Be in home as a queen; workers for home work; has lots ofproperties; kind in family
Mannar4 Man: Educational knowledge; working in an organisation; earning forsociety welfare; familiar with all people
Woman: Care to society improvement; working in an organisation; notinvolving any problems
Trincomalee Man: Industrious person (help to poor people); active with skills; socialservice (rehabilitationwork for a¡ected person); kindly behaved toothers
Woman: Knowledgable (BA graduate in Sri Lanka University); brilliant(graduate teacher, has own land, other needed properties); hard worker(teacher, educating childrenwell and earned lots of money); goodspeaking skills (help to improve life)
Vavuniya5 Man: Kindly behaved with family and society; trust in job; unity, kind,respect, support of family; understanding others mind andwork for it(help to others)
Woman: Ability to ¢nish anything if thought living according to society;has style for him (dresses well for men); well behaved with society asawoman
Traumatic events War-relatedgeneral problems
War-relatedpsychological and behavioral problems
Torturecluster
Otherwartrauma
Familyproblems
Economicproblems
Socialproblems
Lack ofbasicneeds
Physical problems
Anxiety
Other
Depression
Jayawickreme et al.
213
Distress, wellbeing and war: qualitative analyses of civilian interviews from north eastern Sri Lanka
Intervention 2009, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 204 - 222
Examples of items from each of the clusters/subclusters are listed below.
Traumatic events:
� T
M
M
ERHFHSM
214
orture cluster (nine items): Electrocution indetention; rape
� O
therWarTrauma(13items): Beingcaught ina landmine; injured in air bombing/bombblast/raid/attackWar related general problems:
� F
amilyproblems(20items):Maltreatmentbychildren; disruption of marriage plans� E
conomic problems (10 items): Loss of land/home; Lack of employment opportunities� S
ocial Problems (26 items): Lack of docu-ments; Being shunned by society due totime spent in prison� L
ack of Basic Needs (9 items): Lack of food;Sanitation problems� P
hysical Problems (19 items): Shrapnel inbody; Back problemsWar related psychological and behavioural
problems:
� A
nxiety(20items):High inner fear/ ‘fearsitu-ation in mind’; avoiding going outside thehouse due to fearost coded nodes
annar Ja¡na
ducation: 48 Religion: 8eligion: 43 Has emploelps others: 43 Educated:aces challenges: 33 Family unas employment: 26 Family supu⁄cient economy: 22 Faces challotivated: 22 Kind to ot
� D
9ym58ity:poenher
epression(22items):Unsteadymindduetoloss of my loved ones; disappointed in life
� O
ther symptoms (16 items): Use of alcohol toforget painfulmemories; feeling unable topass even one dayWith regards to psychological and beha-vioural problems, prototypical symptoms ofanxiety and depression were identi¢ed(e.g., feelings of guilt, problems concentrat-ing, being easily scared) as well as a numberof idioms of distress (e.g., ‘heart pain,’ ‘brokenmind,’ ‘extreme fear,’ and ‘being in a panic situ-
ation’).
Results: PRPCompetencies Scale
With regards to the ACI data, initial codingrevealed three preliminary groups of con-cepts: Relationship with family and community,
religious and social involvement, and personal
growth.While a range of concepts were notedin the data, examples of more frequentlycited attributes of doing well were ‘havinggood/well motivation’ (having positivethoughts to ful¢l goals), ‘being of good morality’,‘showing benevolence to others’, ‘having unity of
family’, and ‘being a good member of the com-
munity’. As an illustrative example, the fol-lowing represents the most salient conceptsor nodes present in the data from three dis-tricts severely a¡ected by the war, Mannar,Ja¡na, andVavniya:
Vavuniya
Religion: 52ent:70 Family support: 44
Property: 2748 Luxury items:10rt: 46 Tolerability: 9ges: 38 Relative abroad: 9s: 44
Most coded nodes
Mannar Ja¡na Vavuniya
Ability to accept anything: 21 Faces challenges: 38Good character: 21 Ability to accept anything: 37Social service:18 Good habits: 34Family support:14 Property: 33Family unity:19 Educating children: 30Family responsibilities:10 Care of children: 20
Jayawickreme et al.
In coding these data, exhaustive lists ofnodes for each province were drawn up andcomparedwith each other. Further thematicanalysis of the qualitative data pointedtowards the existence of ¢ve distinct andmore narrow clusters: thinking the right
thoughts, family responsibilities, religion, ful¢lling
family needs, and achievement/education. Theseclusters accounted for most of the nodescoded and provided a more speci¢c categor-isation of the data than the three broad clus-ters outlined earlier in the analysis:
Categorisation of some frequently occurring nodes into clusters
Thinkingthe rightthoughts
Familyresponsibilities Religion
Ful¢llingfamilyneeds
Achievement/education
No clearcategory
Responsibility Children’sneeds
Having areligiouspersonality
Adequateincome
Status Childrenabroad
Having ‘goodwell-motivation’
Taking careof family
Ful¢llingreligiousobligations
Saving Educationfor children
Self-con¢dence Marriagefor children
Involvedin socialservice
Havingassets
Good familybackground
Given that one goal of this analysis wasto construct a culturally speci¢c model ofpsychological wellbeing, what is of interest
here is the salience of concepts such as edu-cation, religious practices and beliefs, andpro social behaviour. It seems that individ-uals may invoke achievement (education)and relating to others (pro social behaviour)as de¢ning features of wellbeing, and thatreligious beliefs may both serve as a markerof wellness and a robust coping mechanism.Furthermore, thinking the right thoughtsmay be an indicator of resilience.Analysing the data using these coding pro-cedures provided a culture-speci¢c view of
psychological wellbeing among war a¡ectedSri Lankans. The PRP CompetenciesScale incorporates many of the idiomatic
215
Distress, wellbeing and war: qualitative analyses of civilian interviews from north eastern Sri Lanka
Intervention 2009, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 204 - 222
expressions of this view. Each cluster wasrepresentedwith items such as the following:
� R
216
ight thoughts: I am well motivated toaccomplish my daily life tasks
� N
eeds: I can successfully ful¢l my family’sneeds� F
amily: There is a strong sense of har-mony in my family� R
eligion: I ful¢l my religious responsibil-ities; I have strong religious faith� E
ducation: I place a great emphasis oneducation� P
ro social attitudes: I have the respect ofmy communityWith regards to the speci¢c lessons that thequalitative data o¡er, many of the factorsassociated with wellbeing point towards theimportance of communal activities, includ-ing religious practices, family and socialobligations, as important idioms of well-being. This agrees with previous assess-ments that highlight the importance ofthe community in fostering mental health(Somasundaram, 2007; Galappati, 2003).While thequestionof whether such resourcesare in fact indicative of improved wellbeingand functioning are empirical questionsthat the authors intend to test. The qualita-tive data points tentatively towards theimportance of group and societal levelinterventions that improve the quality ofsocial life, as well as develop individualinterventions that help foster improvedsocial interactions.
DiscussionThe data collected through the RESISTProgramme o¡ered a valuable opportunityfor the development of instruments to assessthe mental health of war a¡ected popu-lations in Sri Lanka. The qualitative meth-odology utilised in this project was both
e⁄cient and relatively inexpensive. Giventhe somewhat volatile nature of many partsof the north east during the time of datacollection, a more in-depth ethnographicapproachmay have not been feasible. Never-theless, the authors acknowledge the valueof methodologies that incorporate inter-views testing deeper questions regardingcultural descriptions. The Key Informant
approach (Betancourt, Speelman, Onyango& Bolton, 2009) is one such method thatcould have successfully complemented themethodology used.It should also be noted that these datawere collected through the FRC andShanthiham, which provide psychosocialprogramming to many regions where thedata collection took place. Therefore, it ispossible that participants were biased bythe fact that they were being asked questionsabout trauma, distress and wellbeing byrepresentatives of a local non pro¢t organis-ation, as they have an incentive to reportmore negative symptoms than they mayactually have (Hoeing, 2004). While thisshould be acknowledged as a possibility, isshould also be noted that the interviewerssampled from a wide range of inhabitantsin the villages that were assessed, and alsoreceived training on appropriate conductwhile interviewing participants.The development of a single psychologicaldistress and wellbeing measure for thewhole of the northern and eastern provincesfrom these data raises the question ofwhether it is possible to speak of a singleTamil culture in these areas. While theauthors believe that many of the nodesused to develop items for the measuresrepresent typical responses from parti-cipants across the two provinces (especiallygiven that much of the data were collectedfrom the two northern districts of Ja¡naand Vavuniya) we remain open to the
Jayawickreme et al.
possibility that di¡erent resources andpsychological symptomsmaybemore preva-lent in di¡erent regions of the north east.Utilising cluster analysis on the question-naire data in the next stage of this projectmay shed further light on this question.6
On a similar note, the authors also acknow-ledge that the convenience sample approachutilised for data collection did not assessvariations of responses based on factors suchas socioeconomic class and religion. It maywell be that interesting and important vari-ations in ‘cultural beliefs’ would have becomeapparent were more attention paid to suchdistinctions. That said, the high number ofresponses from the Ja¡na and Vavuniyadistricts suggests that much of the data werecollected from HinduTamil participants.In addition, given the relatively young ageof the participants, it may be that the datacollected may not provide the type of cul-tural knowledge that an older populationcould provide (Rozin, 2003).While the datathat form the basis of the two measuresare the result of a ‘broad’ understanding ofculture, using an older demographic couldhave provided more insight into the culturalpractices of the communities assessed. Itshould be noted, however, that questionson age, income, ethnicity and religion havebeen included in the next series of studies(detailedbelow)with aview towards captur-ing these more nuanced ‘cultural’ variationsin our follow-up studies.7
In some respects, this project mirrors thework of Fernando (2008), who has developeda culturally sensitive psychological distressscale for Sinhalese populations a¡ected bythe tsunami of December 2004 (Miller &Fernando, 2008). Her work is importantand has contributed signi¢cantly to currentunderstandings of the needs of tsunamia¡ected populations. That said, as Bolton& Tang (2002) have pointed out, it is
important to have a grounded understand-ing of the idioms of distress and well-beingamong speci¢c populations, and it is quitelikely that the idioms identi¢ed in theAWPIand the ACI di¡er from data collectedamong the Sinhala population in the southof the country.The next step is to pilot test the preliminaryquestionnaires with a small population ofwar a¡ected Sri Lankans.This will be donewith a view towards subjecting the itemsin these questions to an exploratory factoranalysis, in order to study the latent variablesunderlying the scale, and to evaluate thepsychometric properties (e.g., reliability) ofthe instrument.With regards to the PRPWar Problems Ques-
tionnaire, there are plans to administer thisnew measure, along with the World Health
Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II
(WHODAS; Janca, Kastrup, Katschnig,Lopez-Ibor Jr., Mezzich & Sartorius, 1996),a physical functioning scale based onWorldHealth Organization (WHO) criteria. Thisscale includes self-reports of socioeconomicactivity, levels of physical energy, and per-ceived health status, so it can be determinedwhether the newmeasure sensitively predictscores on these outcome scales. Furthermore,the Posttraumatic Stress Symptom Scale- Self-
Report (PSS-SR; Foa, Cashman, Jaycox &Perry,1997)), a measure of PTSD symptoms,will be administered so the degree of overlapbetween PTSD symptoms and the moreindigenous symptoms measured by thenewly developed Penn/RESIST/Peradeniya
War Problems Questionnaire can be measured.Similarly, two depression measures—the
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, Ward,Mendelson & Erbaugh, 1961) and the Centrefor Epidemiological Studies ^ Depression (CES-D; Radlo¡,1977) scale will both be adminis-tered so as to examine the degree of overlapbetween depressive symptoms, as measured
217
Distress, wellbeing and war: qualitative analyses of civilian interviews from north eastern Sri Lanka
Intervention 2009, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 204 - 222
by these two standard measurements, andthose measured by the war problems ques-tionnaire.With regards to the PRP Competencies Scale,there are plans to pair the instrument withmeasures of wellbeing, including the Life
Satisfaction Scale (LSS), a widely used andpsychometrically soundmeasure of life satis-faction (Diener, Emmons, Larsen &Gri⁄n,1985), and the Subjective Happiness Scale
(SHS; Lyubormirsky et al., 2005) so thatthe degree of overlap between life satisfac-tion and happiness, as measured by theLSS and SHS, and the potentially moreindigenous markers of ‘wellness’ measuredby the wellbeing questionnaire can beexamined. Two measures of resilience andposttraumatic growth: a shortened versionof the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI;Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996), and the Changesin Outlook Questionnaire (CiOQ; Joseph,Williams, & Yule, 1993), which measuressuccessful adaptation to adverse life eventswill also be included.8
In order to ensure the systematic translationintoTamil of these measures, the translatorsused a translation monitoring form to recordthe translation, lexical back translation andevaluation of each item of thesemeasures.Thismethod enables translators to systematicallyidentify irrelevant, incomprehensible, unac-ceptable and incomplete translation (vanOmmeren Sharma,Thapa,Makaju, Prasain,Bhattarai & de Jong, 1999). The authorssupervised the translation process and thesesessions were invaluable in identifying limi-tations in the design and presentation ofthe measures, as well as ambiguities in thetranslations (Jayawickreme, Jayawickreme,Goonasekera & Foa, in prep.).
ConclusionTo summarise, this research programmeattempts to combine insights from clinical
218
psychology and positive psychology toachieve a more precise understanding ofthe predictors of wellbeing among refugeepopulations in Sri Lanka. The project tocreate a locally valid measurement ofpsychological distress and wellbeing for usein Sri Lanka populations a¡ected by warcontributes to the con£ict managementtools available to psychosocial agencies inSri Lanka and increases their con£ict man-agement capacity. The authors hope thatpopulations directly su¡ering from thee¡ects of the civil war will bene¢t from thisproject in the long term. As stated earlier,the authors believe that the results of ourproject will o¡er important and valuableinsight into how speci¢c communitieswho have, and continue to endure, adverseexperiences conceptualise and expresspsychological distress and wellbeing. The¢ndings will then be able to inform psycho-social interventions in these communities.
AcknowledgementsWe thank the Asia Foundation and the
American Psychological Association for
funding this program of research, and
Dr. Jon Hubbard for his significant contri-
bution to the RESIST project. We also
thank Dr. Uditha Dassanayake and Dr.
M. Mikram for their work on translating
the measures and organising the focus
groups, and Ms. A. Sara Poovendran, Ms.
Charmila Edirisinghe, and Mr. M.I.M.I.
Hassan at the Family Rehabilitation
Center for facilitating data collection.
Ms. Jeanine Guthrie at the Asia Founda-
tion, Dr. Gameela Samarasinghe at
PADHI (University of Colombo), and
Mr. P. Prabu and Mr. Nadaraja Balasubra-
maniam at the Consortium for Humanitar-
ian Agencies (CHA) in Colombo provided
valuable advice at the initial stages of this
project. Thanks also to Martin E.P. Selig-
man at the University of Pennsylvania for
his support.
Jayawickreme et al.
If you would like a copy of the measures
presented in this paper, please email
either Nuwan Jayawickreme at nuwanj
@psych.upenn.edu, Eranda Jayawickreme
at jayawick@sas.upenn.edu, or Michelle A.
Goonasekera at michelle.goonasekera@
gmail.com
ReferencesBeck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., &
Erbaugh, J. (1961).AnInventory forMeasuring
Depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4,
561-571.
Berg, B.L. (2006). Qualitative research methods for the
social sciences. NewYork: Allyn & Bacon.
Betancourt,T. S., Speelman, L., Onyango, G., &
Bolton, P. (2009). Aqualitative study of mental
health problems among children displaced by
war in northern Uganda.Transcultural Psychia-
try, 46(2), 238-256.
Bolton, P. & Tang, A. M. (2002). An alternative
approach to cross-cultural function assess-
ment. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiol-
ogy, 37, 537-543.
Bonnano, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human
resilience:Haveweunderestimatedthehuman
capacity to thrive after extremely adverse
events? American Psychologist, 59, 20-28.
de Jong, J. T.V. M. (2002). Public mental health,
traumatic stress and human rights violations
in low-income countries. InJ.T.V. M. deJong
(Ed.), Trauma,war, and violence: Public mental
health in socio-cultural context (pp.1-91).NewYork:
KluwerAcademic/Plenum.
deJong, Komproe, I. H., Van Ommeren, M., El
Masri, M., Araya, M., Khaled, N., van de
Put,W., & Somasundaram,D. (2001). Lifetime
events and posttraumatic stress disorder in
4 postcon£ict settings. Journal of the American
Medical Association, 286, 555-562.
Diener, E. Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., &
Gri⁄n, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life
scale. Journal of PersonalityAssessment, 49,71-75.
Fernando,G. (2008).AssessingMentalHealthand
Psychosocial Status in Communties Exposed
toTraumaticEvents: SriLankaasanExample.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78(2), 229-
239.
Foa, E. B., Cashman, L., Jaycox, L., & Perry, K.
(1997).The validation of a self-report measure
of posttraumatic stress disorder:The Posttrau-
maticDiagnosticScale.PsychologicalAssessment,
9, 445-451.
Friedman,M. J.&Marsella, A. J. (1996). Posttrau-
matic stress disorder: An overview of the con-
cept. In A. J. Marsella, M. J. Friedman, E.T.
Gerrity,&R.M. Scur¢eld (1996).Ethnocultural
aspects of posttraumatic stress disorder: Issues,
research, and clinical applications (pp. 11-32).
Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
Galappatti,A. (2003).What is apsychosocial inter-
vention?Mapping the ¢eld in Sri Lanka. Inter-
vention, 1(2), 3-17.
Guarnaccia, P. J., Rivera, M., Franco, F., &
Neighbors,C. (1996).Theexperienceofataques
de nervios: towards an anthropology of
emotions in Puerto Rico. Culture, Medicine &
Psychiatry, 20, 342-367.
Hoeing,W. (2004). Self-image and the well-being
of refugees inRhinoCamp,Uganda.NewIssues
in Refugee Research,103.
Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, N., &
Jackson, A. P. (2003). Resource loss, resource
219
Distress, wellbeing and war: qualitative analyses of civilian interviews from north eastern Sri Lanka
Intervention 2009, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 204 - 222
gain, and emotional outcomes among inner
city women. Journal of Social and Personality Psy-
chology, 84(3), 632-643.
International Crisis Group (2006). Sri Lanka:
The failure of the peace process. (Asia report No.
124).
Jayawickreme, N., Jayawickreme, E., Goonase-
kera, M. & Foa, E.B. (in preparation). Focus
Grouping Measures of Depression, PTSD & Well-
Being: Some Issues for Practitioners.
Janca, A. Kastrup, M., Katschnig, H., Lopez-
Ibor, J. J., Jr., Mezzich, J. E., & Sartorius, N.
(1996).TheWorld Health Organization Short Dis-
abilityAssessment Schedule (WHODAS-S): atool
for the assessment of di⁄culties in selected
areas of functioning of patients with mental
disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epide-
miology, 31, 349-354.
Joseph, S. Williams, R., & Yule, W. (1993).
Changes in outlook following disaster: the
preliminary development of a measure to
assess positive and negative responses. Journal
ofTraumatic Stress, 6, 271-279.
Keane,T.M., Kaloupek, D. G., &Weathers, F.W.
(1996). Ethnocultural considerations in the
assessment of PTSD. In A. J. Marsella, M. J.
Friedman, E. T. Gerrity, & R. M. Scur¢eld
(Eds.), Ethnocultural aspects of posttraumatic stress
disorder: Issues, research, and clinical applications
(pp. 183-205). Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
Keane,T.M.,Marshall,A.D.,&Taft,C.T. (2006).
Posttraumatic stress disorder: Etiology, epide-
miology, and treatment outcome. Annual
Review of Clinical Psychology, 2,161-197.
Kleinman, A. (1981). Patients and healers in the
context of culture: An exploration of the borderlines
220
between anthropology, medicine and psychiatry.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Kleinman, A. (1986).The illness narratives: Su¡ering,
healing, and the human condition. NewYork: Basic
Books.
Kleinman, A. (1987). Anthropology and psychia-
try: The role of culture in cross-cultural
research on illness. BritishJournal of Psychiatry,
151, 447-454.
Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress
to the emotions: A history of changing
outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1-
22.
Linley, P.A., Joseph, S., Harrington, S.,&Wood,
A. M. (2006). Positive psychology: past, pre-
sent, and (possible) future. Journal of Positive
Psychology, 1, 3-16.
Lopez, S.R.&Guarnaccia,P. J. J. (2000).Cultural
psychopathology: uncovering the social world
of mental illness. Annual Review of Psychology,
51, 571-598.
Lu, L. & Gilmour, R. (2004). Culture and con-
ceptions of happiness: individual oriented
and social oriented SWB. Journal of Happiness
Studies, 5, 269-291.
Lyubomirsky, S. & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A
measure of subjective happiness: preliminary
reliability and construct validity. Social Indi-
cators Research, 46,137.
Lyubomirsky, S. King, L., & Diener, E. (2005).
The bene¢ts of frequent positive a¡ect: does
happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin,
131(6), 803-855.
Miller, K. E. & Fernando, G. (2008). Epidemio-
logical assessment in emergency settings;
Jayawickreme et al.
recommendations for enhancing a potentially
useful tool. Intervention, 6(3), 255-260.
Miller, K. E., Kulkarni, M., & Kushner, H.
(2006). Beyond trauma-focused psychiatric
epidemiology: bridging research and practice
with war-a¡ected populations. AmericanJour-
nal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 409-422.
Miller, K. E. & Rasco, L. M. (2004).The mental
health of refugees: ecological approaches to healing and
adaptation.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaums.
Osterman, J. E., & deJong, J.T.V.M. (2007). Cul-
tural issues and trauma. In Friedman, M. J.,
Keane,T. M., & Resick, P. A. (Eds.),Handbook
of PTSD: Science and Practice (425-446). New
York: Guilford.
QSR International (2002). Using NVivo in qualita-
tive research. Melbourne: QSR International.
Radlo¡, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale. Applied
PsychologicalMeasurement, 1, 385-401.
Rozin, P. (2003). Five potential principles for
understanding cultural di¡erences in relation
to individual di¡erences. Journal of Research in
Personality, 37, 273-283.
Ry¡, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2002). Flourishing
under ¢re: resilience as a prototype of chal-
lenged thriving. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt
(Eds.). (2002). Flourishing: positive psychology and
the life well-lived.Washington, D.C.: American
Psychological Association.
Seligman,M.E.P.&Csikszentmihalyi,M. (2000).
Positive psychology: an introduction.American
Psychologist, 55,1-20.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Positive psychology,
positive prevention, and positive therapy. In
Snyder, C. R. and Lopez, S. (eds).Handbook of
positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Somasundaram, D. (2007). Collective trauma in
northern Sri Lanka: a qualitative psycho-
social-ecological study. International Journal of
Mental Health Systems, 1(5),1-27.
Steel, Z. Chey, T., Silove, D., Marnane, C.,
Bryant, R. A., & van Ommeren, M. (2009).
Association of torture and other potentially
traumatic eventswithmental health outcomes
among populations exposed to mass con£ict
and displacement: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 302(5), 537-549.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social
scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Stein, D. J., Seedat, S., Iversen, A., &Wessely, S.
(2007). Post-traumatic stress disorder: medi-
cine and politics.The Lancet, 369,139-142.
Summer¢eld, D. (2005). What exactly is emer-
gency or disaster ‘mental health’? Bulletin of
theWorld Health Organization, 83,76-77.
Taylor, S. E., Kemeny,M. E., Reed, G.M., Bower,
J. E., & Gruenewald, T. L. (2000). Psycho-
logical resources, positive illusions and health.
American Psychologist, 55(1), 99-109.
Tedeschi,R.G.&Calhoun,L.G. (1995).Traumaand
transformation.: Growing in the aftermath of su¡er-
ing.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tedeschi, R.G.&Calhoun, L. G. (1996).The post-
traumatic growth inventory: Measuring the
positive legacy of trauma. Journal ofTraumatic
Stress, 9, 455-471.
221
Distress, wellbeing and war: qualitative analyses of civilian interviews from north eastern Sri Lanka
Intervention 2009, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 204 - 222
Tedeschi, R. G., Park, C. L., & Calhoun, L. G.
(1998). Posttraumatic Growth: Positive changes in
the aftermath of crisis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
The Asia Foundation (2006). Capacity building in
monitoring and evaluation. Colombo: The Asia
Foundation/RESIST.
van Ommeren, M. Sharma, B., Thapa, S.,
Makaju, R., Prasain, D., Bhattarai, R., & de
Jong, (1999). Preparing instruments for trans-
cutural research: use of the translation
monitoring formwithNepali-SpeakingBhuta-
nese Refugees.Transcultural Psychiatry, 36, 285-
301.
von Peter, S. (2008). The Experience of ‘Mental
Trauma’ and its Transcultural Application.
Transcultural Psychiatry, 45(4), 639-651.
1 Sinhala language data were also collected from
the Ampara and Anuradhapura districts, but
were not included in this analysis.2 Thanks to Nadaraja Balasubramaniam at the
Consortium for Humanitarian Agencies (CHA)
for his help with these data.
222
3 More informationonthetrainingprocess canbe
found in ‘‘Capacity building in monitoring and
evaluation’’,The Asia Foundation/ RESIST, June
2006.
4 With the exception of the ACI example from
Mannar and Vavuniya, these randomly selected
examples come frommale respondents.
5 See previous endnote.
6 Thanks to Ananda Galappatti and an anony-
mous reviewer for this point.
7 Thanks to an anonymous reviewer for this
point.
8 As ofMay 2009. the ¢rst stage of data collection
has already been completed.
Nuwan Jayawickreme (e-mail: nuwanj@
psych.upenn.edu) & Eranda Jayawickreme
(e-mail: jayawick@sas.upenn.edu) Depart-
ment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michelle A. Goonasekera (e-mail: michelle.
goonasekera@gmail.com),FacultyofMedicine,
University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri
Lanka.
EdnaB.Foa,DepartmentofPsychiatry,Univer-
sity of Pennsylvania School ofMedicine, Phila-
delphia, PA, USA.