Post on 02-Mar-2023
33
Chartres Royal Portal Ascension or Creation?
By Richard J Legault
Copyright September 2018
Copyright December 2020
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 2 of 30
Abstract: A review of why the sculptures over the left door of the Royal Portal of
Notre-Dame de Chartres Cathedral in France, cannot be read as the Apostles
witnessing the Ascension of Christ.
Ascension Doorway – At the cathedral of Notre-Dame de Chartres, the leftmost doorway of the
three-door Royal Portal is generally known as the Ascension doorway. The name refers to the
New Testament narrative in the Acts of the Apostles (1:9-11) describing how the Apostles
watched Jesus Christ ascend to heaven in the flesh, from atop the Mount called Olivet.1
Ascension Day, traditionally a Thursday, the fortieth day of Easter (following the count given in
1 All biblical citations and references are to the King James Version (KJV) except as otherwise noted.
Figure 1 - Royal Portal Left Door Lintels, Tympanum and Archivolts, circa 1145, limestone, Notre Dame de Chartres Cathedral, Chartres. (Photo: Legault)
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 3 of 30
Acts 1:3), has been commemorated in churches from the earliest days of Christianity with a
variety of specialized rites, rituals, prayers, chants, processions, sermons and visual artwork.
Academic and popular sources on Chartres Cathedral generally identify the scene sculpted into
the tympanum, archivolts and lintel stones over this doorway, shown in Figure 1, as depicting
the moment of Christ’s Ascension.2 Most sources simply mention this identification with scant
discussion or analysis of the images themselves in relation to the corresponding Biblical texts.
Some do acknowledge the Ascension interpretation is ambiguous and vulnerable to an
alternative interpretation, yet they nevertheless stick to the conventional view.3 An outstanding
exception to this lack of analysis is Margot E. Fassler’s excellent review of the rituals of the
Feast of the Ascension historically performed at Chartres. Unlike the others, she is less steadfast
in insisting on an Ascension reading of the sculptures. But more importantly, her analysis digs
deeply into the historical facts of the matter by reviewing the rites and rituals performed at
Chartres on the Feast of the Ascension – the liturgy, the songs and most importantly, I think,
the procession. As part of these processional rituals she states specifically that, ‘The sequence
“Rex Omnipotens” was specifically prescribed for singing before the door on Ascension Day [my
2 Katzenellenbogen, Adolf The Sculptural Programs of Chartres Cathedral, 1964, W. W. Norton & Co, New York;
Mâle, Emile The Gothic Image: Religious Art in France of the 13th Century, translated by Dora Nussey, 1983 Harper
& Row, New York; Lévis-Godechot, Nicole Chartres révélée par sa sculpture et ses vitraux (Chartres revealed by her
sculpture and her stained glass windows) 1987 Zodiaque, Paris; Prache, Anne La cathédrale Notre-Dame de
Chartes, 2000 Centre des monuments nationaux, Paris; Ball, Philip Universe of Stone–A Biography of Chartres
Cathedral 2008Harper Collins New York; and Miller, Malcolm (author) and Martin Marix Evans (Editor) Chartres
Cathedral 3rd Revised edition 1996, Pitkin Guides, The History Press Gloucestershire.
3 Lévis-Godechot 1987.
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 4 of 30
emphasis].’ 4 The chant Rex Omnipotens (All Powerful King) opens with a clear and unequivocal
reference to the Ascension:
Rex omnipotens, die hodierna,
Mundo triumphali redempto potentia,
Victor ascendit caelos unde descenderat 5
(This day the King omnipotent,
Having redeemed the world by His triumphant might,
Ascends a Conqueror to heaven, whence He had come.)6
I think this is strong historical evidence that explains how this doorway came to be called the
Ascension doorway. I think it is more a matter of historical ritual usage rather than a matter of
the sculpted images. I think the name Ascension Door describes what the doorway was used
for, that is to say its dedicated function rather than what the artwork itself depicts. Here I will
review how the images in these sculptures fail to match the Biblical description of the Apostles
witnessing the Ascension. I follow the premise that if it is permissible to consider the Cathedral
4 Fassler, Margot Elsbeth The Virgin of Chartres: Making History Through Liturgy and the Arts, p.278 (Yale
University Press, 2010).
5 Latin from Archaeologia, Or, Miscellaneous Tracts Relating to Antiquity, Volume XLVI Society of Antiquaries of
London, 1881, page 400, consulted 1 March 2019 at URL:
https://books.google.com/books?id=gz1GAQAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=
onepage&q=Rex%20Omnipotens&f=falseArchaeologia 1881, English translation from MacDonald 1899);
6 English translation from MacDonald, Frederic W The Latin hymns in the Wesleyan hymn book: studies in
hymnology, Kelly, London 1899, page 57, consulted 1 March 2019 at URL:
http://ia800201.us.archive.org/25/items/latinhymnsinwesl00macd/latinhymnsinwesl00macd.pdf
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 5 of 30
as a virtual Bible rendered in stone images, then the individual images must be understood as
relating to corresponding images presented in the written texts.
The Naming of Doors - It is common in architectural art for doorways to be named for their
function rather than for any art work they might portray. Consider, for example, the east doors
of the baptistery of San Giovanni in Florence, begun in 1425 by Lorenzo Ghiberti. In praise of
Ghiberti and his doors, Giorgio Vasari wrote:
And right truly does Lorenzo deserve to be praised, seeing that one day Michelangelo Buonarroti, having
stopped to look at this work, and being asked what he thought of it, and whether these doors were beautiful,
answered: "They are so beautiful that they would do well for the gates of Paradise": praise truly appropriate,
and given by an able judge.7
While these doors have been universally known as the Gates of Paradise ever since, not one of
their panels has Heaven or Paradise as their primary subject. Every one of the panels depicts
Old Testament scenes taking place on Earth. Though there are numerous tiny peeks into heaven
in the upper background of a few panels, Paradise itself is not a primary subject. The name
Gates of Paradise is a classic example of an architectural artifact named for a function, ‘they
would do well for the gates of Paradise,’ rather than in reference to the subject of the artwork
they portray.
7 Vasari, Giorgio Le Vite de' più eccellenti pittori, scultori, ed architettori (Lives of the Most Eminent Painters,
Sculptors, and Architects): (Torrentino 1550). English Translation by GASTON Du C. De Verre with Five Hundred
Illustrations: in Ten Volumes MacMillan and Co. Ld, and the Medici Society, Ld 1912-14, London. PDF copy
consulted 8 April 2017 at URL: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/25326/25326-h/25326-h.htm
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 6 of 30
Figure 2 - Lorenzo Ghiberti, Gates of Paradise, 1425–52, gilded bronze, east doors of the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Florence. (Photo: Legault)
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 7 of 30
The same could be said for the well-known Jubilee Door more formally known as the Porta
Sacra (Holy Door) of St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome. Pope Boniface VIII began the tradition of the
Holy Year, known as a Jubilee, in 1300 and the Catholic Church has celebrated them every 25
years or so ever since. The Jubilee door is kept walled up with bricks and mortar and broken
open, traditionally by the Pope himself, in a special ritual only in Jubilee years. People
commonly call it the Jubilee Door not because it depicts scenes of a Jubilee, but because of its
function.
Fig.3. Porta Sancta or Jubilee Door by Vico Consorti, bronze cast by Ferdinando Marinelli Artistic Foundry 1950, St. Peter’s Basilica, Rome. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons, Dnalor_01, license CC-BY-SA 3.0)
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 8 of 30
Time and the Royal Portal - A linear concept of time is common to Jewish, Muslim and Christian
teaching. The main idea is that time is an artefact, created by God, who stands back, outside of
time. In the Abrahamic faiths, time begins at a moment of Creation and it flows only in one
direction during the history of the world. Time ends on a Day of Judgement. A core teaching of
the Christian variation on this idea is that historical time, between the two end-points of
Creation and Judgement Day, consists of two great periods. In the Christian view, the
Incarnation, God in the flesh entering the created world, represents the pivotal moment in
history that separates the two great periods. The structure of the Christian Bible precisely and
most fundamentally, reflects this idea, divided as it is into the Old Testament (the period before
Christ) and the New Testament (the period after Christ’s arrival on Earth). Like it or not, this
division of historical time is still in worldwide cultural use today in the conventional Gregorian
calendar.
The objective of medieval cathedral builders was primarily to record and transmit Christian
teaching using images in stone and stained glass. Accordingly, it makes sense to think that
Gothic Cathedral architecture, sculpture and stained glass images would reflect, in possibly
many ways, this most fundamental concept of time and of its three key moments, as a core
Christian teaching. In one view this concept of linear time is precisely the overall theme of the
imagery above the three doors of the Royal Portal, as depicted in Figure 4: Creation on the left,
Second Coming in the center and the Incarnation on the right.8
8 Van Der Meulen, Jan and Nancy Waterman 1981 The West Portals of Chartres Cathedral: The Iconology of the
Creation University Press of America. See also discussion in Fassler, Margot 1993 “Liturgy and Sacred History in the
Twelfth-Century Tympana at Chartres” in The Art Bulletin Vol. 75, No. 3, Sep., 1993.
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 9 of 30
Fig. 4. The Royal Portal Sculptures (excluding jambs, columns and capitals), ca. 1145, limestone, Notre Dame de Chartres Cathedral, Chartres. (Photo and sketch: Legault)
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 10 of 30
Left Door – I am sympathetic, in part, to Van Der Meulen’s unconventional identification of the
sculptures over the left door as an image of Creation. For example, I find that the clear one-for-
one mappability between the images in the sculptures with corresponding passages in the
Bible, so evident over the other two doors, is lacking over the left door explained as an
Ascension scene. The main reference for the Ascension in Scripture is Acts 1: 9-12. It describes a
moment, generally understood as taking place forty days after the resurrection, picking up the
narrative precisely where Matthew’s Gospel ends:
And when he had said these things, as they were looking, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of
their sight. And while they were looking steadfastly into heaven as he went, behold, two men stood by them
in white apparel; who also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye looking into heaven? This Jesus, who was
received up from you into heaven shall so come in like manner as ye beheld him going into heaven. Then
returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is nigh unto Jerusalem, a Sabbath day's
journey off. (Acts 1:9-12 KJV, my emphasis)
This passage explicitly describes an outdoor scene on Mount Olivet under a cloud towards
which Christ bodily rises and into which he then disappears, while the apostles stand ‘looking
steadfastly’ and watching Christ as he is ‘taken up’ into the sky. Two men in white (sometimes
called angels) are there, not in heaven but standing on the ground with the apostles. They
address the apostles who at this time number eleven according to Matthew 27-16, ‘Then the
eleven disciples went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them.’ One
is left to understand this to be the original twelve minus Judas. In the sculptures, as shown in
Figures 1, 4 and 5, on the lower lintel there are only ten figures on the ground, not thirteen
(eleven apostles plus two men in white) as stated in Acts. Contrary to Acts, the ten sit rather
than stand. They sit, if not on thrones, then on furniture of some sort. Accordingly, this can
hardly be the out-door Mount Olivet scene described in Acts. The four descending angels
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 11 of 30
depicted on the upper lintel are not mentioned in any New Testament ascension scene, nor are
the two angels in the tympanum flanking the figure supposedly of Christ rising to heaven.
The only consistency between the sculptures and Biblical descriptions of the Ascension is the
placement of the supposed Christ figure – it is placed in the sky, either in or behind a cloud that
hides his feet, as seen in Figures 1, 4 and 7. This is a very weak mapping with Scripture and
weak evidence to support interpretation as a scene depicting the narrative of Acts 1:9-12.
The Seated Ten – Reading the left door sculptures as a scene depicting the idea of all of
creation and all of time in a single all-encompassing vision in the mind of God, sheds new light
on the meaning of the four angels and ten people sculpted in the lintels, shown in Figure 5.
These men and women (note the feminine bun hairstyle and beardless cheeks of the second
figure from the left) are clearly sitting and physically straining to see and to hear what is going
on around them. They do not all stare in the same direction, ‘looking steadfastly into heaven.’
Fig. 5. The Seated Ten and The Descending Four, lintels over the left door of the Royal Portal 1145, limestone,
Notre Dame de Chartres Cathedral, Chartres. (Photo: Legault)
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 12 of 30
Some look left, some look right and others look upwards. Did some of the missing heads
perhaps once look downwards too? They are perplexed and don’t really know which way to
turn. Their body language speaks. Their chins are jutting out and their necks are craned. These
chins and necks are in such tension that, were a barber to nick one, I swear it would bleed. The
physical straining to look around symbolically emphasizes the mental effort of trying to see, to
hear and to understand Creation and the cycles of time and the seasons that literally surround
them: the signs of the Zodiac and the Labors of the Months sculpted in the archivolts. They are
straining to see and to hear both the heavenly and earthly signs that surround them in order to
try to understand creation and the intentions of their God.
Four Angels - The four angels in the lintel stone, directly above the Seated Ten in Figure 5,
quite clearly have their mouths open. Their whole bodies and their voices aim downwards and
outwards, targeting the earthly realm and the ten figures seated below. Moreover, some of
their hands, wingtips and robes not only project outward from the surface of the lower border
of the stone, they actually drop below the edge of the sculpted frame. As anybody can plainly
see, the idea of thinking outside the box is by no means a modern one - the Chartrians were
experts at it. The clouds of the upper border partly cover the legs and wings uppermost in the
scene. This image is very ambiguous. It enfolds the semantic meaning that these angels are
located at a point of transition between the heavenly realm and the earthly one. They are
depicted in motion – a movement downward and outward into the earthly world of the viewer.
What exactly is the sculptor driving at here? Are these angels messengers, imbued with the
credibility of divine grace, or have they just been cast out, depicted in the act of falling from
grace and on their way to becoming infernal deceivers? A degree of ambiguity and confusion
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 13 of 30
prevails to the consternation, not only of the human figures seated below, but also to initial
attempts by a reader to be immediately certain about what is really going on in this scene.
While the stone itself is forever silent, the body language of the four open-mouthed angels
clearly depicts them in the act of giving voice to speech or to song. The angelic voices, though
inaudible to us as observers of the stones, are clearly audible to the ten figures seated below
who, bewildered, crane their necks and twist their heads to look and to listen and to try to
figure out what in the world – the world of Creation - is going on.
Signs of the Zodiac - The surrounding ten signs of the zodiac in the archivolts over the left door
do not fit well with an Ascension scene. Shown in Figures 1 and 4, these signs do, however, fit
much better with the idea of creation involving ongoing cycles of time that, for humanity,
sweep continuously, cycle after cycle, generation after generation, year after year, from the
time of first creation until the end of time. An appropriate mapping of zodiacal, constellational
and seasonal images to biblical passages is nowhere to be found in Acts, but very clear in
Genesis:
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let
them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of
the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. (Genesis 1:14-15 KJV, my emphasis)
The idea of constellations of stars is even more explicit in the Book of Job where God
explicitly commands, in his own voice, that Job contemplate Creation in all of its on-going
diversity and complexity:
"Now gird up your loins like a man, And I will ask you, and you instruct Me! Job 38:3 KJV
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 14 of 30
"Can you bind the chains of the Pleiades, Or loose the cords of Orion? Can you lead forth a
constellation in its season, And guide the Bear with her satellites?” Job 38:31-32 KJV
Labors of the Months - The additional surrounding images of the twelve Labors of the Months,
seen in the archivolts in Figures 1 and 4, are also a poor fit with the Ascension. However, they
too fit much better with the idea in Genesis of humanity cursed for all time by God. Just before
the expulsion from the Garden, God addresses Adam with a curse that condemns Adam to a life
of labor and toil: ‘Cursed is the ground because of you; in toil you shall eat of it all the days of
your life; thorns and thistles it shall bring forth to you and you shall eat the plants of the field
(Genesis 4:17-18 KJV).’ It is from this moment that the Labors of the Months begin and are set
in motion to endure season upon season, cycle upon cycle, generation upon generation until
the end of time.
The Dove – The Acts of the Apostles mention neither a dove nor the Holy Spirit as being present
at the Ascension. Nevertheless, in the sculptures on the keystone of the inner archivolt there is
the remnant of a mutilated dove, visible in Figure 1. A sketch published in 1946 by Banister
Fletcher shows what the Dove sculpture may have looked like originally.9 The sketch shows the
dove descending with wings spread, tail hidden beneath a cloud, head pointing downwards and
underlain by a cruciform nimbus, as seen in Figure 6. On the actual keystone today the head
and wings of the dove are missing, but the body, the cloud and the nimbus are still visible, as
seen in Figure 1.
9 Fletcher, Banister A History of Architecture on the Comparative Method (17th ed.) page 567, 1946 Category: New
York: Charles Scribner's Sons ISBN: 0750622679.
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 15 of 30
Iconographically speaking, such a dove in such a context represents the Holy Spirit. A deliberate
decision to include the Holy Spirit in the sculptures is yet another indication that the designers
may have had something in mind other than the Ascension.
Sages of the Ages - In my view, the Seated Ten in Figure 5 should not be understood as specific
recognizable individuals. Even though their heads are adorned by halos, marking them
iconographically as saints, it makes some sense not to think of them as the Apostles watching
Christ’s Ascension. These ten seated figures are also an integumental image. Symbolically it
calls to mind the visionaries and seekers of all the generations of humanity. It depicts fallible
human beings who must strain within the limits of their imperfect human abilities to
understand creation, to understand the cycles of seasons and of time that surround them in the
archivolts. They strain to understand the visions, the voices and all the signs coming from
heaven above them and the world around them – both the good and the evil, both the ordered
and the disordered, both the predictable and the chaotic. These are the generations of men
and women who record for posterity their understanding and their visions, as flawed and as
Figure 6 - Dove on the Keystone of the Inner Archivolt of the left Doorway (Images adapted from Fletcher
1946, public domain from https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/55/FGothic_details_567.jpg)
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 16 of 30
limited as they may be, by writing upon the scrolls and in the books of scripture that the
sculptures so clearly depict them as holding in their hands and on their laps. The sculptures
depict them as straining in their attempt to accomplish, however imperfectly, precisely the
same act of contemplating Creation as is accomplished so perfectly and so easily by God the
Creator, standing in heaven above them. They are, however, not quite capable of a complete
understanding. These are, in effect, the same generations of men and women who must strain
‘all the days of their lives’, in the manual Labors of the Months depicted in the archivolts that
surround them. However, having been created in God’s image and endowed with free-will,
intellect and capable of acquiring wisdom, they must also strain and labor intellectually to
develop, master and apply all of the Liberal Arts depicted in the archivolts of the rightmost door
too. This is the labor the sculptures depict them in the act of performing: straining their bodies,
their senses, and their minds in perplexed effort to understand the creation they are
contemplating and to record their discovered wisdom as best they can within the limits of their
flawed and imperfect abilities. This idea is perhaps best summarised, and maps astoundingly
well onto a biblical passage from the Book of Wisdom:
For it is He who gave me unerring knowledge of what exists, to know the structure of the world and the
activity of the elements; the beginning and end and middle of times, the alternations of the solstices and
the changes of the seasons, the cycles of the year and the constellations of the stars, the natures of
animals and the tempers of wild beasts, the powers of spirits and the reasonings of men, the varieties of
plants and the virtues of roots; I learned both what is secret and what is manifest, for Wisdom, the
fashioner of all things, taught me. (Wisdom 7: 17-21 NJB, my emphasis)
An astute reader of this passage will not fail to note the order of the words in the phrase, ‘the
beginning and the end and the middle of times.’ This order is mappable, one for one, on the
three tympana, depicted in Figure 4, using the same convention of reading left to right:
Creation as the beginning of time, Second Coming as the end of time, and Incarnation. In both
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 17 of 30
the sculptures and the text, the dividing point in time – Incarnation and the middle of times -
comes at the rightmost end of the phrasing. No orderly one-for-one mapping of text to image
could be more precise.
I am by no means the first to consider the shortcomings of the traditional view that sees these
ten figures as the apostles and the overall scene as the Ascension. Margot Fassler, for instance,
makes a good evidence-based case for reading the Seated Ten as representing pre-Christian
prophets straining to see the Christ-to-come, while the four angels cry down that he is
present.10 She bases her view on solid historical evidence contained in surviving liturgical
material and contemporary descriptions of processional rituals that would have used these
doorways. Following Fassler’s scholarly methods that match sculptural images to contemporary
texts, one is led to understand these portal sculptures and images in terms of the special
liturgical texts, chants, ritual prayers and processional pathways customised to specific feast
days of the Christian calendar. For instance, one can understand the Nativity and Incarnation
imagery of the rightmost door being activated by a Christmastime procession through it,
accompanied by special prayers, chants and music appropriate to Christmas.
Similarly, one can understand similar specific feast day rituals using the left door for the Feast
of the Ascension. I think it makes sense that the left door probably acquired its association with
the Ascension because of this type of ritual usage – regardless of whether or not this
association truly reflects the content and subject of the artwork. Moreover, we know the
artistic decision-makers included much non-biblical imagery expressive of deeper meaning
10
Fassler, Margot Elsbeth 1993 “Liturgy and Sacred History in the Twelfth-Century Tympana at Chartres” in The Art
Bulletin Vol. 75, No. 3, Sep., 1993.
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 18 of 30
more closely tied to their theology and philosophy than to liturgy. This becomes obvious for
there are simply too many important images in these sculptures that have no bearing
whatsoever on the liturgy. Does anyone know, for instance, of any Christmastime liturgy,
prayers or chants that praise the Seven Liberal Arts and elders of Greek philosophy such as
Aristotle, Ptolemy, Euclid and Pythagoras who surround the Incarnation sculptures, shown in
Figure 7?
Labors of the Mind - The sculptures over the left door (Figure 1) connect semantically, with
eloquence, grace and decorum, to those over the right door (Figure 7). On the right, the
archivolts display the Seven Liberal Arts – the Trivium and Quadrivium – disciplines studied and
taught by the Chartrians as inherited not only from Greek and Roman antiquity, but from Arabic
Figure 7 - Lintels Tympanum and Archivolts over the Right Door of the Royal Portal 1145, limestone, Notre
Dame de Chartres Cathedral, Chartres. (Photo: Legault)
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 19 of 30
translations that had begun circulating in the period of these sculptures. The medieval
philosophers and theologians who taught in the abbeys and cathedral schools saw these arts as
the essential instruments required to contemplate Creation: not only how to observe it and
make sense of it in terms of order, number and measure but also how to properly speak and
write of it. Over the left door, Figure 1, the archivolts and lintels display Creation itself. The
Seated Ten show the intellectual labor, a labor of the mind, performed while seated, of the
Trivium in action with acts of observation (looking and listening), acts of bewildered reasoning,
acts of reading scrolls and books, and acts of recording that understanding, however
incomplete it may be, in writing.
God Figure – Consider the scene in the left door tympanum, shown in better detail in Figure 8,
as one of God standing back and contemplating Creation. While the cruciform halo or nimbus is
well established as a marker of Christ, it also is just as often used as an attribute of God, the
Father. It is also commonly used as an attribute of the Holy Spirit, underlying the head of a
descending Dove. The stonework of the God figure is set deeply back into the archivolts. It does
not protrude outward from the background very much at all, unlike the Christ in Majesty figure
in the Second Coming scene of the center door tympanum, shown in Figure 8. There, in the
Second Coming scene, the stone clearly projects outward from the background to indicate
Christ has exited the heavenly realm to come forward into the earthly realm. However, the
rearward positioned God figure in the left tympanum is definitely in the Heavens, explicitly
depicted standing behind an oddly shaped cloud in the celestial domain. This can easily be
understood an image of God contemplating all of creation and all of time in one all-
encompassing vision of which only an omniscient and almighty God, the Creator of heaven and
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 20 of 30
earth, is capable. From the point of view of Trinitarian theology, it matters not a whit whether
you think of this God figure as God the Father (Yahweh) or God the Son (Jesus). It can depict
neither one nor the other but both and at the same time. In Scripture the one is just as active
and equally responsible for Creation as the other: Yahweh in Genesis and Jesus as the Word
(Logos) in the Gospel according to John:
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the
beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was
made (John 1:1-3 KJV)
Fig. 8. Royal Portal Left Door Tympanum 1145, limestone, Notre Dame de Chartres Cathedral, Chartres. (Photo: Legault)
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 21 of 30
Oddly Shaped Cloud and Angelic Body Language – Consider carefully the odd V-shaped or U-
shaped cloud behind which God stands in Figure 8 – the left door Tympanum. Consider also the
tension and dynamics of the sideways in-leaning posture of the two flanking angels. It is evident
that the sculptor exerted a considerable amount of extra effort in giving this strange shape to
the cloud and this odd posture to the angels. In nature in general and in Gothic art in particular,
clouds generally do not take on the odd angular geometry seen in this image. If the task had
been to simply render the Ascension cloud described in Acts, surely any old cloud shape would
have sufficed and there would be no need for the odd angularity. Similarly, if the angels were
added to the scene (in spite of not being mentioned in Acts) to symbolically represent a
welcoming arrival of Christ in Heaven, there would be no need for the odd angularity of their
Fig. 9. Royal Portal Center Door Tympanum 1145, limestone, Notre Dame de Chartres Cathedral, Chartres. (Photo: Legault)
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 22 of 30
postures. So what did the artist have in mind here and why go through so much trouble to
represent things in this peculiar manner?
The Cloud - The only place in Scripture I can identify God appearing in a cloud of such odd
angularity is in the Book of Job where He appears to Job in a whirlwind. This is also the only
place in Scripture where we are given a comprehensive contemplation of Creation in God’s own
voice in a lengthy series of rhetorical questions posed directly to Job. This litany of questions
describes Creation long after ‘the beginning’ of Genesis, and in its on-going state or
maintenance mode, to call it that. It is a description of Creation encompassing all time in all of
its unfathomable complexity, diversity, harmony and chaos. How well does the V-shaped cloud
match the natural shape of a whirlwind? Images of whirlwinds are hard to come by in medieval
art. In nature, whirlwinds come in a
bewildering variety of shapes and sizes
depending on the atmospheric conditions
that produce them – tornados,
waterspouts, dust devils and so on.
Nevertheless, the actual debris cloud
often formed at the foot of well-formed
tornados do typically display, in nature, a
striking angular funnel top shape, with a
cross section uncannily similar to our V-Fig. 10. Typical Tornado Debris Clouds (Image: Stull 2016)
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 23 of 30
shaped cloud.11 Compare the debris cloud image in Figure 10, for example.
The Flanking Angels – Consider the body language in the odd posture of the two flanking angels
in Figure 8. This is hardly the welcoming or escorting or reverential posture one might expect in
an Ascension scene. The Angels’ gazes are fixed neither on the cloud nor on the God figure, but
outward and backward in the direction of their outer leg or foot. Their bodies also face neither
the cloud nor the God figure. They stand shoulders and hips facing square to the viewer,
precariously leaning sideways toward God and the cloud. Their stance is one of a forceful
bracing in apparent resistance to some force pushing against their bodies. They are straining to
maintain their balance, leaning precariously inward in an effort to prevent or arrest an outward
movement away from the Cloud. The braced legs and feet indicate that these angels are
standing and not in flight. Nevertheless, their wings are fully deployed and pasted against the
archivolt, as though driven by a convulsive gust of wind. Are these Angels more concerned
about their footing than the God figure they accompany? Why do the postures of their hips,
leaning torsos and braced legs have such an uncanny resemblance to the posture that skaters
and skiers use when they dig in their edges to arrest their motion, right down to the direction of
the gaze? It would be silly to suggest that ice skating and skiing were common activities in 12th
century France. Neverheless, I think that the language of the Flanking Angels’ body posture is
deeply embedded in the muscle memory of any child who has ever delighted in sliding across a
11
Stull, Roland Practical Meteorology: An Algebra-based Survey of Atmospheric Science 2016, page 581 (Sundog
Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin). PDF Copy consulted 2 November 2019 at URL:
https://www.eoas.ubc.ca/books/Practical_Meteorology/prmet/PracticalMet_WholeBook-v1_00b.pdf
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 24 of 30
freshly waxed floor or a frozen pond, or of any person resisting gravity’s pull decending a steep
slope or resisting a poweful burst of wind.
Fig. 11. Left Flanking Angel Compared to a Ski Stop Posture. (Photos: Sculpture: Legault, Skier: Ashleigh Mowers)
Fig. 12. Right Flanking Angel Compared to a Hockey Stop Posture.
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 25 of 30
If I am reading the body language of the flanking angels correctly, then this reading is perfectly
consistent with the direction of convulsive forces at play in the typical debris cloud that forms
at the foot of a tornado or whirlwind. When the main funnel of actual tornadic vortices touch
the ground, the debris flies outward from the tornado funnel and upward from the ground. It is
striking how well the convulsive idea of a whirlwind matches and animates the simultaneously
tense and dynamic posture of the flanking angels. Coupled with the odd angularity of a cloud
that matches so well with the cross section of a tornado’s debris cloud, I am easily fully
persuaded that the sculptor here wanted the viewer to understand, by visual analogy, the idea
of God enveloped in a whirlwind. Accordingly, I think the Biblical text of greatest relevance to
the imagery is the Book of Job and this supports the idea that the scene is more one of a
Contemplation of Creation than of an Ascension.
Ambiguity and Self-Reference - The artwork over the left door includes elements of ambiguity
and self-reference. It depicts Creation as something ambiguous and difficult for flawed and
imperfect human beings to understand fully. There is ambiguity and disorder for instance in the
signs of the zodiac and the labors of the months that are in horrible discontinuity compared to
their usual orderly calendrical sequence. Have two of the signs, Pisces and Gemini, been ripped
away and thrown out of their positions by the tornadic forces of the tympanum, to land in the
archivolt of the Incarnation Door, like a tornado-tossed Dorothy and Toto thrown from Kansas
into Oz?
There is ambiguity in the role of the four descending angels. That the sculptures themselves are
a little bit ambiguous and difficult for an observer to understand is abundantly obvious to me
from the fact that so many art historians and interpreters have, over the years, gotten it
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 26 of 30
completely wrong by seeing them as a depiction of the Apostles witnessing Christ’s Ascension. I
think it is most evident that the designer of these sculptures deliberately made the imagery a
little bit ambiguous and difficult (though not impossible) to understand. I think the ambiguity
and difficulty for humanity to fully understand Creation is one of the many integumentally
layered meanings the designer intended to convey. Could there be any more eloquent or
graceful a way of depicting ambiguity than by deliberately wrapping your meaning in
ambiguous images? Moreover, you almost have to chuckle when it dawns on you that this
ambiguous human artifact speaks of the ambiguity of divine Creation. Considering the artists
who created the images considered themselves and their artefacts elements of divine Creation,
you must conclude, at the end of a twisted loop of logic that this is an image of the Creator
having endowed Creation with some ability to perceive and to contemplate itself. In a sense,
because it too is part of the Creation to which it refers, the inanimate image contemplates
itself.
I think it is clear, the images over the left door do not depict the Apostles watching the
Ascension of Christ. They encompass a contemplation of Creation. It is a scene, on the one
hand, of Creation contemplated from above, by the perfect understanding of the Creator and,
on the other hand, of Creation contemplated from below, by the strained and imperfect
understanding of human beings.
Evidence - As a matter of proper evidence for any interpretation, here in Part I of this series of
articles on the Royal Portal, I work with the idea of one-for-one mappings of the sculpted
images with matching passages of biblical text. If the initial premise is that a Gothic cathedral is
a stone and glass replica of the biblical text, then logic dictates that for each and every biblical
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 27 of 30
image there must be one or more matching passages of corresponding biblical text. The same
approach must also apply to matching non-biblical images to passages in non-biblical texts.
Accordingly, as a reader seeking meaning, I must attach greater significance where text and
image match best and where the quantity of one-for-one mappability between the two is
greatest. I defy any biblical expert to extract from Scripture a greater number of matches for
the left tympanum, archivolt and lintel sculptures that would support interpreting its primary
meaning as a typical Ascension scene rather than a scene of Creation Contemplated.
Isomorphism and Self-reference - In speaking of one-for-one mappability, essential to
analogical reasoning, and of self-reference, the modern reader should notice here that the
Chartrian methods of expression exhibit the deliberate exploitation of tools and techniques
described by modern cognitive science. For example, Douglas Hofstadter, arguably one of the
most well respected pioneers of modern cognitive science, has written much about reasoning
by analogy and the importance of analogical one-for-one mappings. He describes them, alluding
to their use in mathematics, as isomorphisms. He writes (Hofstadter 1979):
The perception of an isomorphism between two known structures is a significant
advance in knowledge – and I claim that it is such perceptions of isomorphism which
create meanings in the minds of people (Hofstadter’s italics).12
In this first of three papers on the Royal Portal sculptures of Chartres Cathedral, I have followed
in Hofstadter’s footsteps in applying his concept of isomorphism and of reasoning by analogy to
pair one-for-one some Chartrian images to the texts they best and most closely match. In this
12
Hofstadter, Douglas Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, page 50, 1979 Basic Books, New York.
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 28 of 30
way, if Hofstadter is correct about isomorphisms and meaning, I hope to have extracted greater
meaning from the artefacts than has previously been possible.
Food for Thought - For this brief essay, I resist a tempting digression into Hofstadter’s work on
isomorphisms and analogical thinking. Instead, here I have shown, as a matter of observable
fact, that the Chartrians were experts at exploiting many tools and techniques now studied in
modern cognitive science, in designing recognizable isomorphisms and analogies between
sculpted images and written texts. Suffice it to say that these tools and techniques are nothing
very new. They are fruit born of seed wisely planted long, long ago in orchards tended by the
wisest sages of both classical and medieval antiquity. They have fed generations of bewildered
and hungry seekers for millennia – a labor for all seasons, as it were.
Indeed, I will further explore these images as Icons for all Seasons in a separate paper.
Acknowledgements: Improvements to this paper were inspired by
encouraging input from:
Mike Klug author of Mandorlas in our Midst, a medieval art blog at
https://mikejklug.wordpress.com/
Roland Stull Director, Geophysical Disaster Computational Fluid
Dynamics Center, University of British Columbia, and
The participants on the British on-line discussion forum for Medieval
Religion at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/medieval-religion
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 29 of 30
References
_________, Archaeologia, Or, Miscellaneous Tracts Relating to Antiquity, Volume XLVI Society
of Antiquaries of London, 1881, page 400, consulted 1 March 2019 at URL:
https://books.google.com/books?id=gz1GAQAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_sum
mary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=Rex%20Omnipotens&f=false
Ball, Philip 2008 Universe of Stone–A Biography of Chartres Cathedral Harper Collins New York.
Fassler, Margot Elsbeth 1993 “Liturgy and Sacred History in the Twelfth-Century Tympana at
Chartres” in The Art Bulletin Vol. 75, No. 3, Sep., 1993.
Fassler, Margot Elsbeth 2010 The Virgin of Chartres: Making History Through Liturgy and the
Arts Yale University Press.
Hofstadter, Douglas 1979 Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
Katzenellenbogen, Adolf 1964 The Sculptural Programs of Chartres Cathedral W. W. Norton &
Co, New York.
Lévis-Godechot, Nicole 1987 Chartres révélée par sa sculpture et ses vitraux (Chartres revealed
by her sculpture and her stained glass windows) Zodiaque, Paris.
MacDonald, Frederic W 1899 The Latin hymns in the Wesleyan hymn book: studies in
hymnology, Kelly, London 1899, page 57, consulted 1 March 2019 at URL:
http://ia800201.us.archive.org/25/items/latinhymnsinwesl00macd/latinhymnsinwesl00macd.p
df
Mâle, Emile 1958 The Gothic Image: Religious Art in France of the 13th Century, translated by
Dora Nussey, Harper & Row, New York.
Chartres Royal Portal - Ascension or Creation?
Page 30 of 30
Mâle, Emile 1983 Chartres Harper and Row, New York.
Miller, Malcolm (author) and Martin Marix Evans (Editor) 1996 Chartres Cathedral Pitkin
Guides, The History Press Gloucestershire, 3rd Revised edition (July 1 1996).
Prache, Anne 2000 La cathédrale Notre-Dame de Chartes, Centre des monuments nationaux,
Paris.
Van Der Meulen, Jan and Nancy Waterman 1981 The West Portals of Chartres Cathedral: The
Iconology of the Creation University Press of America.
Stull, Roland 2016 Practical Meteorology: An Algebra-based Survey of Atmospheric Science
Sundog Publishing, Madison Wisconsin. PDF Copy consulted 2 November 2019 at URL:
https://www.eoas.ubc.ca/books/Practical_Meteorology/prmet/PracticalMet_WholeBook-
v1_00b.pdf
Vasari, Giorgio 1550 Le Vite de' più eccellenti pittori, scultori, ed architettori (Lives of the Most
Eminent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects): Torrentino (1550). English Translation by GASTON
Du C. De Verre with Five Hundred Illustrations: in Ten Volumes MacMillan and Co. Ld, and the
Medici Society, Ld 1912-14, London, consulted 8 April 2017 at URL:
http://www.csus.edu/indiv/o/obriene/art192b/readings/giorgio-vasari-lives-of-the-most-
emminent.pdf