A Model of Subjective Well-Being for Adolescents in High School

Post on 28-Mar-2023

2 views 0 download

Transcript of A Model of Subjective Well-Being for Adolescents in High School

A Model of Subjective Well-Being for Adolescentsin High School

Ali Eryılmaz

Published online: 11 April 2011� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Abstract The aim of this study is to develop and test a subjective well-being model for

adolescents in high school. A total of 255 adolescents in high school (131 female and 124

male) participated in this study. Data was collected by using the general needs satisfaction

questionnaire, questionnaire for the strategies to increase subjective well-being, life sat-

isfaction questionnaire and positive and negative affects questionnaire. The structural

equation modelling method was used for analysis of the data. The results of the analysis

showed that in the original model, the individual variables and the total effect of variables

were directly and indirectly related to subjective well being of adolescents in high school.

The direct and indirect effects of the independent variables to subjective well-being were

found significant. The findings suggest that to enhance the subjective well-being of high

school students, a combination of strategies and satisfaction of needs is essential.

Keywords Subjective well-being � Satisfaction of needs � Strategies � Adolescents

1 Introduction

Adolescence is considered a complex stage of life with its own specific biological, psy-

chological, and sociological aspects. According to Erikson (1968), the development of a

healthy individual identity is a major task of adolescence during which every adolescent

experiences an identity crisis. If an integrated sense of identity cannot be established by the

end of adolescence, the state of identity confusion is experienced. Adolescence is also a

period of cognitive development. Rapid cognitive changes result in increased interest in

abstract ideas and issues (Piaget and Inhelder 1973). During this time, adolescents develop

an interest in political issues, human rights, feminism, and environment or spiritual issues

(Steinberg 2005). Additionally, another developmental task during this period is to achieve

psychological independence from parents, while maintaining connectedness (Allen et al.

1994; Grotevant and Cooper 1985). The transformation model suggests that adolescents’

A. Eryılmaz (&)Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkeye-mail: erali76@hotmail.com

123

J Happiness Stud (2012) 13:275–289DOI 10.1007/s10902-011-9263-9

affect with their families decreases in early adolescence and then increases in late ado-

lescence (Collins and Laursen 2004; Eberly and Montemayor 1999; Larson et al. 1996).

Moreover, during adolescence, close friends play important role, and also they begin to

surpass parents as adolescents’ primary source of social support and contribute in

important ways to adolescents’ self-concept and well-being (Furman and Buhrmester 1992;

La Greca and Harrison 2005). These changes take place in a context of cognitive, physical,

and psychosocial development (Collins and Repinski 1994) which enables adolescents to

become more stable and mature (Lerner 1985; Moore and Boldero 1991).

The rapid changes in development may cause adaptation problems. For instance, ado-

lescents who experience identity confusion-related distress had more school and behavioral

problems (Wires et al. 1994), many adolescents have a propensity for risk taking behaviors

as a result of cognitive immaturity (Steinberg 2004). Discrepancies between adolescents’

and parents’ expectations about decision making and control could give rise to a decline of

warmth and to increasing conflicts (Collins et al. 1997). Furthermore, some studies have

found linkages between adolescents’ peer relations and mental health, such as feelings of

depression and social anxiety (Hecht et al. 1998; La Greca and Lopez 1998). These

negative experiences prevent adolescents from fulfilling their responsibilities and devel-

opmental tasks (Mcknight et al. 2002). As a result, the changes experienced during this

period might affect adolescents’ happiness, in other words, their subjective well-being.

Happiness is conceptualized as subjective well-being in literature, which refers to an

individuals’ evaluation of their life. Subjective well-being is not a single dimensional

structure but is considered to comprise three elements: positive affection, negative affec-

tion and life satisfaction (Andrews and Withey 1976; Deiner 1984). Positive affection

includes positive feelings such as confidence, interest, hope, pride, and joy while negative

affection includes negative feelings such as rage, hate, guilt, and sadness. The life satis-

faction dimension is a cognitive component of subjective well-being (Myers and Deiner

1995). If they have more experiences that give pleasure; they are considered to have more

subjective well-being.

In the literature, the subjective well being of children and adolescents were investigated

based on demographic factors such as age, education, gender, and socioeconomic status.

Conflicting results have been reported about the relationship between adolescents’ sub-

jective well-being and demographic variables. For instance, in a recent study with

Lithuanian adolescents (Sarakauskien _e and Bagdonas 2010) significant relationships

between subjective well-being and some demographic variables such as age, living con-

ditions, academic achievement, family composition, and parental education were reported.

On the other hand, age and gender were not significantly associated with subjective well-

being of Scottish adolescents (Karatzias et al. 2006). In addition, studies in the USA do not

ascribe much significance to the relationship between demographic factors and subjective

well-being (Huebner et al. 2000, 2004; McCullough et al. 2002). Subjective well being also

shows variations based on the different stages of adolescence. For instance, according to

results of a recent longitudinal study with Norwegian students, aged 8–16 years, showed

statistically significant differences in terms of age and gender in various domains of

subjective well-being (Jozefiak et al. 2009).

Adolescents’ subjective well-being is also related with psychological factors such as

internal locus of control and self esteem (Huebner 1991), positive transitions during early

adolescence from primary to junior high school (Wigfield et al. 1991), peer relations

(Hartup and Stevens 1997), personality traits of extraversion and neuroticism and lack of

stressful life events (Mcknight et al. 2002), somatic diseases (Vargus-Adams 2006; Varni

276 A. Eryılmaz

123

et al. 2004), family structure and relationships (Huebner 2004; Huebner et al. 2000;

Joronen and Kurki 2005; Park 2004; Rask et al. 2003; Shek 1998; Shek and Lee 2007).

Nowadays, educators and psychologists have shifted their focus from individual

pathologies to studying positive structures in school environments (Suldo et al. 2006).

Therefore, many studies have focused on the relations between subjective well-being and

contextual variables such as school satisfaction (Baker 1998; Huebner and Gilman 2003),

teacher support (Suldo and Huebner 2004), and other individual variables such as intel-

ligence (Ash and Huebner 2001), and academic achievement (Cheng and Furnham 2002;

Huebner 1991; Huebner and Alderman 1993). However, a study does not exist which

focuses on how adolescents can lead a happy life in the school environment outside the

academic context. The present study focuses on a nonacademic contributor of subjective

well-being for adolescents in high school investigating the relationship between subjective

well-being increasing strategies and need satisfaction.

1.1 Subjective Well-Being and Subjective Well-Being Increasing Strategies

The achievement of subjective well-being is one of the most important goals of humankind

(Fordyce 1977, 1983). Numerous studies have focused on individual’s subjective well-

being (Buss 2000; Lyubomirsky 2001), but little scientific research has focused on the

relationship between subjective well-being of adolescents in high school and strategies to

increase subjective well-being. Purposeful activities are discussed in relation to strategies

for enhancing or increasing subjective well-being. Purposeful activities have been shown

to account for a 40% affect on an individuals’ subjective well-being (Tkach and Lyubo-

mirsky 2006). Strategies for increasing subjective well-being were first conducted by

Fordyce (1977, 1983). In the first phase of his empirical study, Fordyce (1977) determined

eight strategies that increase individuals’ subjective well-being. In the second phase, he

increased the number of strategies to 14. In the third phase of the study, he concluded that

the most effective strategies were positive and optimistic thinking, dealing with new

activities, having a life full of activities, participating in more social activities, improving

extravert personality traits, and decreasing negative thoughts. In his later study, he con-

cluded similar findings (Fordyce 1983).

According to evolutionary psychology, humans are a species highly concerned with

subjective well-being, with a potential for considerable variation in mood. Therefore,

subjective well-being possibly means more to our species than to another (Grinde 2002).

Evolutionary psychology yields insight into some of the major obstacles to achieving a

high subjective well-being including discrepancies between modern and ancestral condi-

tions, the existence of evolved mechanisms designed to produce psychological pain, and

the inherently competitive nature of some evolved mechanisms (Buss 2000; Cosmides and

Tooby 1999; Eaton et al. 1988). Evolutionary psychology also identifies several strategies

to reduce the gap between the living conditions of primitive and modern times, to improve

relations with relatives and friends, to obtain close friends, to decrease subjective stress, to

change competitive structures into cooperation and to manage them, and also to satisfy

desires (Buss 2000).

A number of strategies were found positively related to increased subjective well-being

(Tkach and Lyubomirsky 2006). These strategies are having social relations, participating

in activities actively and passively, defining and reaching goals, displaying behaviors

related to subjective well-being, taking part in religious activities and having cognitive

control. Several studies on strategies to increase subjective well-being have also been

conducted in Turkey. Eryılmaz and Yorulmaz (2006) concluded that, in their pursuit of

A Model of Subjective Well-Being for Adolescents in High School 277

123

happiness, adolescents employ strategies such as having positive relations with other

people, giving respect and love to others, seeking delectation, having positive academic

experiences, having romantic relations, retaining happiness, and controlling negative

feelings. In another study, Eryılmaz (2010) measured five strategies commonly used by

adolescents to enhance their subjective well-being. The instrument measured their desires

to receive positive reaction from the environment, react positively to other people, satisfy

one’s desires, participate in religious activity, and retain subjective well-being or mental

control.

Similar findings have been reported in literature. Receiving and giving positive reac-

tions to an environment are similar to Buss’s (2000) strategy of developing closeness to

extended kin and deep friendship, Fordyce’s (1977, 1983) developing an outgoing social

personality, and Tkach and Lyubomirsky’s (2006) social affiliation strategy. The third

strategy, which is related to Tkach and Lyubomirsky’s (2006) religion strategy, is to

participate in religious activities. The fourth strategy concerns the satisfaction of desires

and is similar to Buss’s (2000) fulfillment of desire. Protecting subjective well being is a

strategy akin to Tkach and Lyubomirsky’s (2006) one for mental control.

1.2 Subjective Well-Being and Need Satisfaction

Satisfaction of needs is an important variable which affects subjective well-being. The self

determination theory proposes that, from birth, individuals exhibit three important psy-

chological needs: competence, relatedness, and autonomy. Competence means that con-

cerning the individual’s success in difficult matters and their efforts until he or she gets the

desired result. Secondly, the need for relatedness means to form trust based on mutual

respect. Finally, the need for autonomy refers to the individual’s making a choice and

having initiative (Ryan and Deci 2000).

When the literature is examined, significant associations can be seen between satis-

faction of competence, relatedness, autonomy and subjective well-being. (Ryan and Deci

2000). When individuals satisfy their needs of competence, relatedness, and autonomy,

they become healthier and feel better. When these needs are not satisfied, individuals

develop more diseases (Baard et al. 1998; Kasser and Ryan 1999; Ilardi et al. 1993;

Sheldon et al. 1996; Reis et al. 2000; Sheldon and Bettencourt 2002). Other studies either

directly or indirectly refer to the importance of satisfaction of needs for children and

adolescents (Crocker and Hakim–Larson 1997; Noom et al. 1999; Ryan and Grolnick

1986). According to Ryan and Deci (2000), these three basic needs must be handled in all

stages of life. Therefore, the relation between satisfaction of needs and subjective well-

being can be observed throughout an individual’s development. From this standpoint, it is

important to investigate the relationship between satisfaction of needs and subjective well-

being in adolescence.

Studies on subjective well-being are quite recent and this topic is still in its infancy

(Lyubomirsky et al. 2005). Indeed, no studies seem to exist in the literature which

examines the relation between satisfaction of needs and strategies for increasing subjective

well-being. Given that satisfaction of needs is related to subjective well-being, it is thought

that there is an interrelated role between subjective well-being and the strategies to

increase it.

It is also important to examine these concepts across cultures. Turkey is a rapidly

changing society. Turkey has been a secular democracy since 1923, and has adopted

Western life style for the past 88 years. Western values and lifestyles have been fostered

both by the state and the mass media (Hortacsu 1997). Although they are raised in

278 A. Eryılmaz

123

traditional families, the Turkish adolescents are familiar with western lifestyles and values

from the mass media. In our day, globalization causes many more people to seek ways of

subjective well-being (Lyubomirsky et al. 2005), including adolescents in high school.

Demographically Turkey is a young society. For instance, in Turkey, there are 11,237

school psychologists. The number of schoolchildren who are in 12-year compulsory

education is 14,346,637 (Jimerson et al. 2009). The subjective well-being of so many

children is an important issue.

Studies conducted in Turkey or elsewhere; do not seem to focus on subjective well-being,

need satisfaction and strategies to increase subjective well-being for adolescents in high

school. Understanding the relations between these variables will provide insight into the

direction and the power of these variables. This information can be useful for the positive

development of adolescents in high school (Huebner 1991; McCullough et al. 2002).

The aim of this study is to test a model that examines the relation between subjective

well-being of adolescents attending high school, satisfaction of their needs and the strat-

egies to increase subjective well-being. Three important hypotheses were established:

(a) The strategies to increase subjective well-being have a positive effect on subjective

well-being of adolescents in high school,

(b) Satisfaction of needs has a positive effect on subjective well-being of adolescents in

high school and,

(c) Satisfaction of needs has a significant mediator effect on the relation between

subjective well-being and the strategies to increase it.

2 Method

2.1 Research Design and Procedure

This study aims to develop a structural equation model which involves subjective well-

being, satisfaction of needs and strategies to increase subjective well-being for adolescents

attending high school. A causal comparative scanning model was used as this was seen to

best fit the purpose of the study. In this study, frequency and percentage analyses have been

used to analyze the demographic features of the participants. In order to test the developed

model, a structural equation model was employed. The dependent variable of the study is

subjective well-being and the independent variables are satisfaction of needs and strategies

to increase subjective well-being.

Sample selection method was purposive sampling. Purposive sampling allows

researcher to be able to select one or more sub-sections from the universe rather than a

representative sampling of the universe. In other words, purposive sampling allows

researcher to select the most appropriate observation unit from the universe (Fraenkel and

Wallen 1993). Researcher in using purposive sampling is able to choose a specific unit

based on theoretical knowledge and specific goals of the study (Buyukozturk et al. 2008;

Sencer 1989). In this study, maximum variation was used among the purposive sampling

methods. In order to determine the sample, inclusion and exclusion criteria were used.

Inclusion criteria for the study were the following: participants should be between 14 and

16-years-old and should be attending a general high school. Exclusion criteria for the study

were not to have a chronic illness and should not have a psychiatric diagnosis.

Structural equation models (SEM) are sensitive to sample size which means that the

SEM nearly always rejects the model when large samples are used (Bentler and Bonnet

A Model of Subjective Well-Being for Adolescents in High School 279

123

1980; Joreskog and Sorbom 1993). On the other hand, where small samples are used, SEM

lacks power and, because of this, may not distinguish between good fitting models and

poor fitting models (Kenny and McCoach 2003). Concerning sample size, Kline (1998,

2005) refers to sample sizes lower than 100 as small, those between 100 and 200 as

medium and those higher than 300 as large samples. Based on these explanations, the study

group consisted of 200–300 adolescents attending high school.

This study was carried on adolescents attending a state high school in Ankara, Turkey.

The school was chosen for practical reasons as the author of this study worked at this

school. A cross-sectional model was used, as data was collected at one time. The data was

collected by asking the participants to fill out the scales individually. The participants were

briefly informed about the aim of the study and further information was provided if

requested. All participants were volunteers and were required to provide personal identity

information. The implementation of the scales took 60–70 min. The data was collected

between February and March 2010.

2.2 Participants

The study group initially consisted of 306 participants. Prior to data analyses, the participants’

answers were reviewed. As a result of this review, 34 individuals who left most of the items of

the scale blank (at least 5% of the items) or who were detected to mistakenly check the wrong

answer in the answer sheet were excluded from the data set. Nine adolescents who have

chronic illness and eight adolescents who have psychiatric diagnosis were excluded from the

data set. As a result, a total of 255 adolescents, 124 (48.6%) males and 131 (51.4%) females,

participated in the study. Their ages varied between 14 and 16 years. The mean age of

subjects was 15.84 years and the standard deviation was .75. The sample was divided

between 162 (63.5%) ninth grade students and 93 (36.5%) students in the tenth grade.

Among the mothers of participants, 102 (40.0%) were high school graduates; 83

(32.5%) had completed only primary education; 56 (22.0%) had a bachelor’s degree; 11

(4.3%) had two-year university degrees and 3 (1.2%) had a master’s degree. Among the

fathers, 103 (40.4%) held a bachelor’s degree; 88 (34.5) were high school graduates; 36

(14.1%) were primary school graduates; 21 (8.2) had two-year university degrees; and 7

(2.7%) had a master’s degree. Of the parents of participants, 230 (90.2%) were married and

living together in the same house; 18 (7.1%) were divorced and 7 (2.7%) were deceased.

The adolescents were asked to grade their socio-economic level and 201 (78.83%) spec-

ified it as middle, 32 (12.54%) as lower, and 22 (8.63%) as higher socio-economic level.

2.3 Instruments

2.3.1 Personal Information Form

In this study, a personal information form which included variables such as having chronic

illness, having psychiatric diagnosis, age, gender, educational level and socio-economic

level was used to reveal the demographic features of the participants.

2.3.2 Satisfaction with Life Scale

This scale was developed by Diener (1994) and translated into Turkish by Koker (1991). It

is a Likert-type scale with five items. The total point score is obtained by adding the values

280 A. Eryılmaz

123

of the marked choices in the scale. The test–retest reliability co-efficient of the scale which

was administered twice with a three-week interval was .85. In the reliability calculation,

the Cronbach Alpha reliability co-efficient was found as .76. In the adaptation work of this

scale to Turkish, there was no attempt to establish the validity of this scale. For this reason,

the factor structure of the scale was examined in this study. After the exploratory factor

analysis, a single factorial structure was obtained. This single dimension explained 56.05%

of the total variance.

2.3.3 Positive and Negative Affects Scale-PANAS

Positive and Negative Affects Scale was developed by Watson, Tellegen and Clark (1988)

and adapted to Turkish by Gencoz (2000). This scale consists of a total of twenty state-

ments, ten positive and ten negative, about affects. Evaluation is carried out with a five

point likert scale. In Gencoz’s study (2000), the Turkish version of Positive and Negative

Affects Scale was found to have two dimensions and be consistent with its original version.

Its internal consistency for positive affects was reported to be .83 and negative affects to be

.86. In addition, its test–retest consistency was reported to be .40 for positive affects and

.54 for negative affects. In order to reveal criterion-related validity, the Beck Depression

Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory were used. The correlation of the positive affects

scale with the first one of these two inventories is -.48 and with the second one -.22. The

correlation of the negative affects scale with the first inventory is .51 and with the second

one .47.

2.3.4 Basic Need Satisfaction in General Scale

This scale which was developed by Deci and Ryan (1991) and has 21 items concerning

three needs: competence, autonomy and relatedness. It was adapted to Turkish by

Cihangir-Cankaya and Bacanli (2003). This 21-item questionnaire assesses the individuals’

satisfaction of intrinsic needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness. There are six

items for competence, eight items for relatedness, and seven items for autonomy, to which

participants responded on 5-point scales. The internal consistency of the scale for com-

petence is .80; for autonomy .82, and for relatedness .81.

2.3.5 Subjective Well Being Increasing Strategies Scale for Adolescents

This scale was developed by Eryılmaz (2010). The scale is composed of 17 items with a

4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (almost never) to 4 (all the time). Exploratory

factor analysis was performed to examine the factor structure of scale. It explained 59% of

the variance in five dimensions: (a) receiving positive reaction from an environment,

(b) participating in religious activity, (c) reacting positively to an environment, (d) satis-

faction of desires, and (e) protecting subjective well being or mental control. The total

score is computed as the sum of the scores on each of the 17 items. In addition to the total

score, the scores from the subscales were computed. The total score of the scale can range

between 17 and 68 points. The scale can be administered individually or collectively. A

higher total and subscale score indicates a higher level of using subjective well-being

strategies. The internal consistency of the scale for receiving positive reaction from an

environment is .85, for doing religious activities .92, for reacting positively to environment

.90, for satisfaction of desires .68, for protecting subjective well being or mental control

A Model of Subjective Well-Being for Adolescents in High School 281

123

.71, and for the whole scale .86. The item-total correlations also supported the internal

consistency of the scale. The items were moderately correlated with the total point (.53–.74

range). A sub-sample of individuals (n = 60) completed a 2-week test–retest session,

which yielded a reliability coefficient of .89. The concurrent validity of the scale was

computed with the satisfaction with life scale. The reliability and validity analyses showed

that the scale was reliable and valid.

3 Results

First, statistical findings related to the dependent and independent variables are presented.

Thereafter, the findings related to the structural model developed during this study are

reported.

3.1 Descriptive Statistical Findings Related to the Dependent and Independent

Variables in the Research

Mean and Standard Deviation measures related to the dependent and independent variables

in the study were calculated. The results of the analysis are given in Table 1.

3.2 Findings Related to the Model of Subjective Well-Being Adolescence Attending

High School

The structural equation model and the findings related to standardized coefficients repre-

senting the relation between the variables were developed in this part of the study. The

findings of the fitness of the model and their evaluations are presented.

As seen in Fig. 1, the structural equation model’s standardized coefficients express the

relation between the dependent and independent variables of the research. The general

fitness coefficients related to the developed structural model are given in Table 2.

As seen in Table 2, the fitness coefficients related to the developed model are above

acceptable limits. For example, the value of NFI is .93, NNFI is .95, CFI is .96, GFI is .94,

RMSEA is .066, and AGFI is .90. According to Kline (1998, 2005) these values indicate

that the model is acceptable.

Table Descriptive statistics

n = 255

Variables X SD

Life satisfaction 24.77 5.71

Positive affect 36.78 5.88

Negative affect 20.77 5.74

Need for autonomy 36.72 5.45

Need for competence 29.74 4.95

Need for relatedness 37.01 6.44

Receiving positive reaction from an environment 14.70 2.01

Participating in religious activity 9.74 2.35

Reacting positively to an environment 10.27 1.72

Mental control 10.10 1.90

Satisfaction of desires 12.64 2.29

282 A. Eryılmaz

123

It is necessary to clarify the meanings of model fitness coefficients, the standardized and

unstandardized values of model, and the direct, indirect and mediation relations. The effect

size of the coefficients in the developed model was also taken into consideration in the

evaluation of the model which is given in Table 3.

Standardized and unstandardized path coefficients have been used to explain the effect

of the independent variables of this research on subjective well-being. Kline (1998, 2005)

defines standardized path coefficients effect size as low if it is below .10, average if it is

below .30 and, high if it is above .50. Accordingly, the strongest predictor in the model is

satisfaction of needs (standardized coefficient = .95). One unit increase in satisfaction of

needs increases subjective well-being by .89. The second predictor in the model is strat-

egies for increasing subjective well being (standardized coefficient = .31). One unit

increase in strategies for increasing subjective well being increases subjective well-being

by .31 points.

0.34

0.95

0.31

Subjective

Well-Being

Increasing

Strategies

Satisfaction

of Needs

Subjective

Well -Being

Need for

Autonomy

Need for

Competence

Need for

Relatedness

0.68

0.74

0.70

Satifaction of

Desires

Participating In

Religious

Activity

Reacting

Positively To An

Environment

Receiving Positive

Reaction From An

Environment

Mental Control

Negative Affect

Satisfaction of

Life

Positive Affect

0.480.700.75 0.76 0.55

0.56

0.51

-0.44

0.51 0.44 0.42 0.70 0.77

0.74

-0.800.45

0.51

0.54

0.69

0.95

Fig. 1 Structural equation model related to subjective well-being of adolescents in high school—satisfaction of needs and employment of strategies for improving subjective well-being

Table 2 General fitness coeffi-cients related to post-hoc modelchanges

* p \ .01

Fit index Value

v2 78.12*

DF 41

NFI .93

NNFI .95

CFI .96

GFI .94

AGFI .90

RMSEA .066*

A Model of Subjective Well-Being for Adolescents in High School 283

123

It can be seen from Table 3 that there is a mediator effect of satisfaction of needs

between subjective well-being and strategies for increasing well being in the model. In

other words, adolescents with high subjective well being strategies are able to satisfy their

needs, which in turn increases their subjective well-being (Sobel Test = 3.72; p = 00).

These results also show that those adolescents who use subjective well-being strategies can

satisfy their needs and this satisfaction increases the level of their subjective well being

(standardized coefficients = .30).

The total effect of one variable on the other is defined as the total effect of all direct and

indirect effects between them. Based on this, while the unstandardized total effect size of

subjective well being increasing strategies on subjective well-being is .63, the standardized

effect is .61 (Z = 4.23; p \ .00).

A general view of these findings is that the effect of subjective well-being increasing

strategies and the direct, indirect and total effect of satisfaction of needs on subjective well

being are meaningful. The findings were therefore observed to support all the hypotheses

of the research.

4 Discussion

In this study, a model for subjective well-being of adolescents in high school was devel-

oped based on subjective well-being increasing strategies and satisfaction of needs. In this

section, the results of the study are discussed by referring to the literature.

The literature shows that satisfying individual needs increases the level of subjective

well-being. Most studies mentioned have been conducted on young adults and adults

(Baard et al. 1998; Kasser and Ryan 1999; Ilardi et al. 1993; Ryan and Deci 2000; Sheldon

et al. 1996; Reis et al. 2000; Sheldon and Bettencourt 2002). This study concludes that the

satisfaction of adolescents’ needs is in parallel with the increase in their subjective well-

being. At this point, it can be concluded that there are similar relationships between

satisfaction of needs and subjective well-being even in different developmental stages.

These results are an important contribution to the literature as the relations between these

two variables have been studied with adolescents attending high school.

The literature shows that employing subjective well-being increasing strategies is

effective on subjective well-being as a whole. The studies mentioned have been undertaken

with young adults (Tkach and Lyubomirsky 2006). In this particular study, the effect of the

related variable on subjective well-being has been analyzed with adolescents attending

high school. To improve the subjective well-being of adolescents attending high school,

Table 3 The evaluation of the final model

Variables Standardizedcoefficients

Unstandardizedcoefficients

Effectsize

The direct effect of subjective well-beingincreasing strategies

.31 .31 Moderate

The direct effect of satisfaction of needs .95 .89 High

The mediator effect of satisfaction of needs .30 .32 Moderate

The total effect of subjective well-beingincreasing strategies

.61 .63 High

284 A. Eryılmaz

123

this study has contributed to the field by putting forth the relation between subjective well-

being increasing strategies and satisfaction of needs.

The literature shows that while there are studies that analyze the direct relations

between subjective well-being and the mentioned variables, none have analyzed the

indirect relations. On the other hand, theoretical explanations of the relations between these

variables are mentioned in the literature. For example, according to the Telic Theory of

subjective well-being, goal oriented activities account for a 40% affect on individuals’

subjective well-being (Tkach and Lyubomirsky 2006). Goal-oriented activities include

both satisfaction of needs and involvement in goal-oriented activities. According to Telic

Theory, subjective well-being, goals and needs are related to each other (Lykken and

Tellegen, 1996). Some goals arise as a result of the individuals’ desire to fulfill their needs

(Deiner 1984; Ryan and Deci 2000). According to the model in this study, adolescents

attending high school can unite subjective well-being increasing strategies with satisfaction

of needs. In this way, subjective well-being achieves a positive level through both needs

and goal oriented activities. This result supports the theoretical explanations in the

literature.

This study informs school psychologists’ practices which aim to improve adolescents’

subjective well-being. First of all, to increase the subjective well-being of adolescents

attending high school knowing and applying subjective well-being strategies is necessarybut not sufficient. A greater contribution to subjective well-being of adolescents attending

high school can be achieved when these strategies are put into practice paralleled with

efforts to satisfy the needs of individuals. Secondly, the importance of the mediating effect

of need satisfaction in increasing adolescents’ subjective well-being should not be ignored.

School psychologists may engage in studies to give adolescents more need satisfaction and

strategies to increase subjective well-being. The need for larger positive intervention and

prevention is also emphasized in the literature (Ash and Huebner 2001). School psy-

chologists, teachers and school administrators should organize their learning environments

to satisfy the needs of adolescents and to increase using of subjective well-being increasing

strategies. During this organization process, parents, school psychologists, teachers and

school administrators can offer social support to adolescents, thus assuming a role in

increasing their subjective well-being by applying subjective well-being increasing strat-

egies and need satisfaction. For example, school psychological counseling and guidance

programs may include activities to use subjective well-being increasing strategies of

adolescents attending high school as well as supply them satisfaction of needs.

Adolescent development depends on socio-cultural factors (Chen 2000). Debates are

present in literature asking whether findings about subjective well-being are valid for all

cultures (Diener and Diener 1995). At the heart of these debates lie the different views on

subjective well-being in individualistic and collectivist cultures. For instance, there are

previous studies about the affects of culture on Korean and USA adolescents’ subjective

well-being (Park and Huebner 2005). Therefore, testing the validity of the model on

adolescents attending high school from different cultures may contribute to the literature.

Further, there are studies that have revealed developmental differences in the subjective

well-being of early, middle, and late adolescents (Jozefiak et al. 2009; Park 2005). Thus,

future studies may test subjective well-being models on individuals at different stages of

adolescence attending high school.

The life-span development approach has provided significant information and data

(Baltes 1987). A similar study may provide an opportunity to produce developmental

information when conducted on individuals in every stage of life. Hence, the place of the

relation among these three variables in life can be better put forward.

A Model of Subjective Well-Being for Adolescents in High School 285

123

The most significant limitation of this study is that all participants were adolescents

attending high school. The model developed here should also be tested on adolescents who

are not in high school or engaged in further education, have chronic illness and psychiatric

diagnosis.

In conclusion, strategies that increase subjective well-being are necessary but insuffi-

cient to enhance the subjective well-being of adolescents attending high school. It can thus

be claimed that in order to enhance the subjective well-being of adolescents attending high

school, a combination of strategies and needs satisfaction is essential.

References

Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K. L., & O’Connor, T. G. (1994). Longitudinal assessment of autonomy andrelatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem. Child Development, 65, 179–194.

Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.Ash, C., & Huebner, E. S. (2001). Environmental events and life satisfaction reports of adolescents: A test of

cognitive mediation. School Psychology International, 22, 320–336.Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1998). Intrinsic need satisfaction. A motivational basis of

performance and well-being in work settings. Unpublished manuscript, Fordham University.Baker, J. A. (1998). The social context of school satisfaction among urban, low-income, African–American

students. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 25–44.Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoritical propositons of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics

between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611–626.Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance

structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.Buss, D. M. (2000). The evolution of happiness. American Psychologist, 55, 15–23.Buyukozturk, S., Kılıc-Cakmak, E., Akgun, O. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2008). Scientific research

method. Ankara: Pegem A Press.Chen, X. (2000). Growing up in a collectivistic culture: Socialization and socioemotional development in

Chinese children. In A. L. Comunian & U. Gielen (Eds.), International perspectives on humandevelopment (pp. 331–354). Lengerich: Pabst.

Cheng, H., & Furnham, A. (2002). Personality, peer relations, and self-confidence as predictors of happinessand loneliness. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 327–339.

Cihangir-Cankaya, Z., & Bacanlı, H. (2003). Adaptation of the needs satisfaction in general scale. Paperpresented at the meeting of VII. National Psychological Counseling, Malatya, Turkey.

Collins, W. A., Hennighausen, K. H., Schmit, D. T., & Sroufe, L. A. (1997). Developmental precursors ofromantic relationships: A longitudinal analysis. In S. Shulman & W. A. Collins (Eds.), Romanticrelationships in adolescence: Developmental perspectives (pp. 69–84). San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.

Collins, W. A., & Laursen, B. (2004). Changing relationships, changing youth: Interpersonal contexts ofadolescent development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 55–62.

Collins, W. A., & Repinski, D. J. (1994). Relationships during adolescence: Continuity and change ininterpersonal perspective. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Personal rela-tionships during adolescence (pp. 7–36). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1999). Toward an evolutionary taxonomy of treatable conditions. Journal ofAbnormal Psychology, 108, 453–464.

Crocker, A. D., & Hakim–Larson, J. (1997). Predictors of pre–adolescent depression and suicidal ideation.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 29, 76–82.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality.In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288).Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Deiner, E. (1984). Subjective well being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research,

31, 103–157.Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of

Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653–663.

286 A. Eryılmaz

123

Eaton, S. B., Konner, M., & Shostak, M. (1988). Stone agers in the fast lane: Chronic degenerative diseasesin evolutionary perspective. The American Journal of Medicine, 84, 739–749.

Eberly, M. B., & Montemayor, R. (1999). Adolescent affection and helpfulness toward parents: A 2-yearfollow up. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 226–248.

Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Developing a scale about subjective well being increases strategies for adolescents.

Journal of Turkish Psychological Counseling, 33, 81–88.Eryılmaz, A. & Yorulmaz, A (2006). The Way of being happy for adolescents. Paper presented at the Xth

conference of European association for research on adolescence, Antalya, Turkey.Fordyce, M. W. (1977). Development of a program to increase happiness. Journal of Counseling

Psychology, 24, 511–521.Fordyce, M. W. (1983). A program to increase happiness: Further studies. Journal of Counseling

Psychology, 30, 483–498.Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York:

Mcgraw Hill.Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal

relationships. Child Development, 63, 103–115.Gencoz, T. (2000). Positive and negative affect schedule: A study of validity and reliability. Turkish Journal

of Psychology, 46, 19–26.Grinde, B. (2002). Darwinian happiness: Evolution as a guide for living and understanding human

behavior. Princeton, NJ: Darwin Press.Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. (1985). Patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development

of identity exploration in adolescence. Child Development, 56, 415–428.Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1997). Friendship and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin,

121, 355–370.Hecht, D. B., Inderbitzen, H. M., & Bukowski, A. L. (1998). The relationship between peer status and

depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,26, 153–160.

Hortacsu, N. (1997). Cross-cultural comparison of need importance and need satisfaction during adoles-cence: Turkey and the United States. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158(3), 287–296.

Huebner, E. S. (1991). Correlates of life satisfaction in children. School Psychology Quarterly, 6, 103–111.Huebner, E. S. (2004). Research on assessment of life satisfaction in children and adolescents. Social

Indicators Research, 66, 3–33.Huebner, E. S., & Alderman, G. L. (1993). Convergent and discriminant validation of a children’s life

satisfaction scale: Its relationship to selfand teacher-reported psychological problems and schoolfunctioning. Social Indicators Research, 30, 71–82.

Huebner, E. S., Drane, W., & Valois, R. F. (2000). Levels and demographic correlates of adolescent lifesatisfaction reports. Social Psychology International, 21(3), 281–292.

Huebner, E. S., & Gilman, R. (2003). Toward a focus on positive psychology in school psychology. SchoolPsychology Quarterly, 18, 99–102.

Huebner, E. S., Suldo, S. M., Smith, L. C., & McKnight, C. G. (2004). Life satisfaction in children andyouth: Empirical foundations and implications for school psychologists [Special issue]. Psychology inthe Schools, 41, 81–93.

Ilardi, B. C., Leone, D., Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation:Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1789–1805.

Jimerson, S. R., Stewart, K., Skokut, M., Cardenas, S. C., & Malone, H. (2009). How many schoolpsychologists are there in each country of the world? International estimates of school psychologistsand school psychologist-to-student ratios. School Psychology International, 30(6), 555–567.

Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modelling with the simplis commandlanguage. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.

Joronen, K., & Kurki, A. (2005). Familial contribution to adolescent subjective well being. InternationalJournal of Nursing Practice, 11(3), 125–133.

Jozefiak, T., Larsson, B., & Wichstrom, L. (2009). Changes in quality of life among Norwegian schoolchildren: A six-month follow-up study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(7).

Karatzias, A., Chouliara, Z., Power, K., & Swanson, V. (2006). Predicting general well- being from selfesteem and affectivity: An exploratory study with Scottish adolescents. Quality of Life Research,15, 1143–1151.

A Model of Subjective Well-Being for Adolescents in High School 287

123

Kasser, V., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). The relation of psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness tovitality, well-being, and mortality in a nursing home. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,29, 935–954.

Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structuralequation modelling. Structural Equation Modelling, 10(3), 333–351.

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: Guilford Press.Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New York: The

Guilford Press.Koker S (1991). Comparing the level of the life satisfaction of the normal adolescents and adolescents with

problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.La Greca, A. M., & Harrison, H. W. (2005). Adolescent peer relations, Friendships and romantic rela-

tionships: Do they predict social anxiety and depression? Journal of Clinical Child and AdolescentPsychology, 34, 49–61.

La Greca, A. M., & Lopez, N. (1998). Social anxiety among adolescents: Linkages with peer relations andfriendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 83–94.

Larson, R. W., Richards, M. H., Moneta, g., Holmbeck, G., & Duckett, E. (1996). Changes in adolescents’daily interactions with their families from ages 10–18: Disengagement and transformation. Develop-metal Psychology, 32, 744–754.

Lerner, R. M. (1985). Constitutional psychology. In A. M. Kuper & J. Kuper (Eds.), The social scienceencyclopedia (pp. 156–157). London: Routledge.

Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science,7, 186–189.

Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others?: The role of cognitive and motivationalprocesses in well-being. American Psychologist, 56, 239–249.

Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sus-tainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.

McCullough, G., Huebner, S., & Laughlin, J. E. (2002). Life events, self concept, and adolescent’s positivesubjective well-being. Psychology in the School, 3, 281–290.

Mcknight, C. G., Huebner, E. S., & Suldo, S. (2002). Relationships among stressful life events, tempera-ment, problem behaviour, and global life satisfaction in adolescents. Psychology in the Schools,39, 677–687.

Moore, S., & Boldero, J. (1991). Psychosocial development and friendship functions in Adolescence. SexRoles, 25(9/10), 521–536.

Myers, D., & Deiner, E. (1995). Who is happy. American Psychological Society, 6(1), 1–19.Noom, M. J., Dekovic, M., & Meeus, W. H. J. (1999). Autonomy, attachment and psychosocial adjustment

during adolescence: A double–edged sword? Journal of Adolescence, 22, 771–783.Park, N. (2004). The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. The Annals of American

Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 25–39.Park, N. (2005). Life satisfaction among Korean children and youth: A developmental perspective. School

Psychology International Journal, 26, 209–223.Park, N., & Huebner, E. S. (2005). A cross-cultural study of the levels and correlates of life satisfaction

among adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 444–456.Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1973). Memory and intelligence. New York: Basic Books.Rask, K., Kurki, P. A., & Paavilainen, E. (2003). Adolescent subjective well-being and family dynamics.

Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 17, 129–138.Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of

autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435.Ryan, M. R., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation,

social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self–report and projective

assessment of individual differences in children’s perceptions. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 50, 550–558.

Sarakauskien _e, Z., & Bagdonas, A. (2010). Relationship between components of subjective well-being andsocio-demographic variables in older schoolchildren. Psichologija, 41, 18–32.

Sencer, M. (1989). Method for social science. Istanbul: Beta Press.Shek, D. T. L. (1998). A longitudinal study of Hong Kong adolescents’ and parents’ perceptions of family

functioning and well-being. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159, 389–403.Shek, D. T. L., & Lee, T. Y. (2007). Family life quality and emotional quality of life in Chinese adolescents

with and without economic disadvantage. Social Indicators Research, 80(2), 393–410.

288 A. Eryılmaz

123

Sheldon, K. M., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2002). Psychological need-satisfaction and subjective well-beingwithin social groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 25–38.

Sheldon, K. M., Reis, H. T., & Ryan, R. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy inthe day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279.

Steinberg, L. (2004). Risk-taking in adolescence: What changes, and why? Annals of the New York Academyof Sciences, 1021, 51–58.

Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 69–74.

Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2004). Does life satisfactionmoderate the effects of stressful life events onpsychopathological behavior in adolescence? School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 93–105.

Suldo, S. M., Riley, K., & Shaffer, E. S. (2006). Academic correlates of children and adolescents’ lifesatisfaction. School Psychology International, 27(5), 567–582.

Tkach, C., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How do people pursue happiness? Relating personality, happinessincreasing strategies, and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 183–225.

Vargus-Adams, J. (2006). Longitudinal use of the child health questionnaire in childhood cerebral palsy.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 343–347.

Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., & Szer, I. S. (2004). The PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale in pediatricrheumatology: Reliability and validity. Journal of Rheumatology, 31, 2494–2500.

Watson, D., Tellegen, A., & Clark, L. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive andnegative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., Mac Iver, D., Reuman, D., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions at early adolescence:Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition tojunior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552–565.

Wires, J. W., Barocas, R., & Hollenbeck, A. R. (1994). Determinants of adolescent identity development: Across-sequential study of boarding school boys. Adolescence, 29(114), 361–378.

A Model of Subjective Well-Being for Adolescents in High School 289

123

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.