The significance of sheltering in the
lives of four women affected by
abusive relationships
Ruth WrightDepartment of Psychology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Peace KiguwaDepartment of Psychology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Charles PotterDepartment of Psychology, School of Human and Community Development, University of theWitwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS, 2050, South [email protected]
Domestic violence is recognised as a pervasive problem in South Africa. This study focused on thenarratives of four abused women and attempted to establish the significance of sheltering in their lives. Aqualitative research design was used based on semi-structured interviews, which were analysedthematically. The findings supported past research, indicating that although the women’s experiences werediverse they contained many features similar to those reported in previous studies. Each of the four womenwas not a passive victim, having taken the decision to leave an abusive and violent relationship. Shelteringwas found to provide the protected space necessary to move beyond the abuse, and in addition providedthe structure and social support necessary to start to transcend the abuse. Sheltering was found to fill gapscreated by a society in transition, in which abuse and violence are often tolerated or condoned withinexisting social and family structures.
Keywords: abused women; agency; domestic violence; gender violence; empowerment; shelter
Although there have been many studies of domestic violence over the past three
decades, it remains a persistent and elusive social problem without reliable or lasting
solutions. The most publicly and professionally debated aspect remains the quandary
over why women remain in abusive relationships. Research has established that the
problem has no socioeconomic, racial, ethnic, or national boundaries, affecting one
woman in six worldwide (Lawson, 2003). In South Africa, sheltering specifically for
abused women is a comparatively recent phenomenon. The knowledge and models of
sheltering based on Western experience have created debate on the appropriateness of
shelters in different environments. Many African and developing nations do not use or
616
# Psychological Society of South Africa. All rights reserved. South African Journal of Psychology, 37(3), 2007, pp. 616–637ISSN 0081-2464
see the need for high-cost sheltering since the role of the traditional extended family is
to act as a mediator in disputes between partners (Park, Shaik, & Rasool, 2000). Yet
social conditions such as urbanisation, modernisation, and the patterns of migrant
workers in Africa have impacted on the traditional family deterrents to domestic
violence (Vetten, 2000).
In South Africa, Angless and Maconachie (1996) report that it is estimated that one
in four women is subjected to violence from her intimate partner. These are believed to
be under-estimates. South Africa has been described as ‘one of the gender violence
capitals of the world’ (Dangor, Fedler, & Park, 2000). The current theoretical
explanations for partner/intimate violence are divided into three major groupings. Each
of these theoretical positions emphasises the complex, multifaceted nature of the
phenomenon, which is conceptualised as both a social problem and an individual one
(Dwyer, Smokowski, Bricout, & Wodarski, 1996).
The psychiatric model covers all theories pertaining to individual pathology,
including early childhood development, intrapsychic characteristics, alcohol and drug
abuse, and interactional family theory (Foreman & Dallos, 1993; Lawson, 2003;
Wallace, 1998). The social-psychological model analyses the environmental factors and
social structures by focusing on social learning theory (Simons, Lin, & Gordon, 1998),
resource exchange theory (MacMillan & Gartner, 1999), ecological theory (Carlson,
1984), and evolutionary psychological theory (Wilson & Daly, 1998). Finally, the socio-
cultural model based largely on feminist theory is focused on the social roles of women
and the cultural attitudes towards viewing violence against women as acceptable. This
group includes theories such as violence in society as a whole and patriarchy theory
(Dobash & Dobash, 1992; Fedler & Tanzer, 2000; McWilliams, 1998; Vetten, 2000).
A review of the research literature on domestic violence (Wright, 2006) suggests that
different theoretical models have taken dominant positions at particular times in
history, and are dependent on fluctuating contextual and cultural influences. In
studying the types of abuse that women experience, it is thus essential to determine the
impact of the abuse on their lives, as this informs the choices women perceive as
available to them. Male abuse against women can be conceptualised as occurring on a
continuum of behaviours, involving explicit and implicit threats to misuse power over
women (Goodman, Koss, Fizgerald, Russo, & Keita, 1993). Traditionally, research
concentrated on the type, frequency, severity, and uncontrollable nature of the physical
abuse (Lawson, 2003). Contemporary research acknowledges that men use other forms
of controlling behaviours such as sexual, economic, and emotional or psychological
abuse (Kirkwood, 1997).
Given the high prevalence of violence in society, what is defined as abuse and what
are acceptable levels of abuse are debated both in the academic and public forums.
Sorenson (1996) points out that the attitudes concerning acceptable levels of abuse have
evolved over time and are determined by social norms and practices. Kirkwood (1997)
proposes that the different types of abuse do not operate in isolation, but are
617
The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships
interconnected and therefore impact on intervention and the healing process for the
women.
This study focused on the narratives of four women in relationships in which they
experienced severe mental and physical abuse. It also explored the situations that led
them to leave the abusive relationships and seek shelter. In addition, the study
examined whether the women were able to move beyond and transcend their
experiences with abuse. The study was guided by the following research questions:
(a) Why do women seek assistance in sheltering? (b) Did the shelter experience meet the
expectations and needs of the women? and (c) Did the women experience empowerment
and agency as a result of their stay at the shelter?
RESPONSES TO ABUSE: THREE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS
The responses of four women to abuse were analysed using Lempert’s (1996) theoretical
framework, staying/leaving patterns (Kirkwood, 1997), and paradigmatic shift or last-
straw events (Rosen & Stith, 1995). Lempert (1996) outlines three progressive stages
that women use to cope with the abuse and its contradictions: keeping the violence
invisible, containing the violence and preserving agency, and making the invisible
visible.
Lempert’s stages of coping with abuse
Lempert (1996) provides a good starting point in her outline of three progressive stages
that women use to cope with the abuse and its contradictions. She argues that violent
episodes are often part of a very entangled and multifaceted relationship between two
people. In the first stage of the abuse, the overriding concern is with keeping the abuse
invisible. Caught up in contradictory and overly romanticised expectations of her role
as a ‘dutiful’ and ‘good’ partner, a woman in an abusive relationship will tend to
experience both shame and confusion about her abusive situation, and will therefore
hide the violence. Face-saving strategies as a way of preventing public exposure of the
abuse are then used to preserve some semblance of credibility as a happy couple.
According to Lempert (1996), the abusive male partner is also often complicit in this
charade and will use protective measures such as controlled assaults to hide any
evidence of beatings.
The second stage is characterised by a desire both to contain the violence and preserve
personal agency. This stage brings realisation of unhealthy and idealistic expectations
for relationships as possibly unattainable. The increasing unpredictability, frequency,
and severity of the abuse also contribute to this ‘turning point’ (Campbell, Rose, Kub,
& Nedd, 1998) whereby women will negotiate for a non-violent relationship, such as
problem-solving, self-preservation, and subordinating self strategies. These strategies
are influenced by the way in which the woman understands the violence and the
618
Ruth Wright, Peace Kiguwa, and Charles Potter
resources available to her. The strategy of leaving, however, is still not central to these
processes.
The third stage is dependent on both cultural definitions and contextual influences.
This stage is concerned with making the violence more visible, for example by taking
family members into close confidence about the abuse (Dobash & Dobash, 1992).
Legal, social, and medical agencies are also consulted. Kirkwood (1997) describes this
as an outward spiral movement whereby the woman becomes aware of the
consequences of the abuse and the importance of gaining personal resources as a
means of shifting the balance of control from her abuser, and to re-establish her own
needs, wishes, and eventual departure.
Staying/leaving patterns
Why women stay, leave, and then return to abusive relationships continues to be one of
the most debated research questions in domestic violence literature. Common
perceptions or misperceptions of women’s having the option to stay or leave do not
always take into account the woman’s own perceptions and contextual factors that may
limit her opportunity to do so (Choice & Lamke, 1997; Kirkwood, 1997). Numerous
theoretical positions have been advocated, however, to explain abused women’s staying
and leaving patterns. These include the notion of a learned helplessness (Walker, 1984,
cited in Choice & Lamke, 1997), cycle of violence (Walker, 1984, cited in Wallace,
1998), traumatic bonding theory (Wallace, 1998), psychological entrapment, investment
model, and reasoned action approach (Choice & Lamke, 1997; Rusbult & Martz, 1995),
normalising violence model (Eisikovits, Goldblatt, & Winstok, 1999), and exchange
theory (Johnson, 1992).
Paradigmatic shift or last straw events
Rosen and Stith (1995) identify the process of leaving an abusive relationship as ‘a
paradigmatic shift and last straw event’ (p. 158). This process can occur over an
extended length of time where there is an accumulation of numerous small events, or it
can occur suddenly and dramatically with one catastrophic event leading to immediate
leaving. When women assess the situation as dangerous or undeserving, they let go of
their relationship-maintaining rationalisations and begin to actively seek different
options (Rosen & Stith, 1995). A process of growing self-awareness and self-worth
begins to be nurtured more actively. However, although this shift brings about the
desire to leave the relationship, leaving is often a painful and difficult process.
Dobash and Dobash (1992) and Green (1999) argue that women are not passive,
docile victims as portrayed in popular literature, but are actively negotiating their
relationship in order to control or eliminate the abuse. Kirkwood (1997) presents the
most influential argument in emphasising the empowering and learning elements of the
staying/leaving actions in her spiral inward/outward concept. As two very prominent
619
The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships
concepts in community psychology, empowerment and human agency have generated
considerable debate, making them complicated concepts to operationalise in evaluating
their presence. The critics of empowerment find the concept problematic since it is
based on Western social and economic belief systems (Riger, 1993), while authors such
as Ramazanoglu and Holland (1993) argue that women’s socialisation and the
discourses surrounding women’s experiences with subordination compromise female
agency and actions.
Yet empowerment theory postulates that it is possible to empower women in a shelter
environment. In Kirkwood’s (1997) research, three levels were identified at which
sheltering can assist abused women to find empowerment and agency through the
acquisition of resources and knowledge, the opportunity to give voice to their
experiences, and actions towards broader social change. These issues are explored in the
current study by focusing on the decision made by four South African women to seek
safety in a shelter in preference to traditional community and family networks and
structures, as a basis for moving beyond the abuse and taking control of their lives.
However, the notion of empowerment in relation to abused women remains a difficult
one, for many reasons. The tensions that exist between notions of subjectivity and
agency highlight some of the contradictory positions that some women experiencing
intimate partner abuse will adopt, such as choosing to stay or even return to the abusive
relationship. Such contradictory positions are not accounted for in traditionally
essentialist constructs of subjectivity (Long & Zietkiewicz, 2006). Although it is not the
focal point of discussion in this study, we acknowledge this significance in moving
beyond traditional conceptualisations of women abuse.
METHOD
Research into domestic violence is influenced by the debate over the appropriate use of
qualitative versus quantitative research methodology. Although statistical data have
been instrumental in bringing public and academic attention to the plight of battered
women, Johnson (1998) argues that qualitative and ethnographic research studies are
required to document the real-life subtleties of human interactions implicated in
violence against women. This study is based in the qualitative research tradition,
concentrating on the narratives of four women, which are explored in depth. It thus
focuses on what Simons et al. (1998) has called the ‘science of the singular’, and
attempts to find commonalties across a small number of individual case studies (Lucas,
1974a, 1974b).
Design
For this research study, a qualitative naturalistic design was employed, using a semi-
structured interview technique. Due to the naturalistic format, the research design
proved to be an evolving process. Following Neuman’s (1997) suggestions on field
620
Ruth Wright, Peace Kiguwa, and Charles Potter
research, a technique of progressive focusing was used to identify themes as they
emerged in the interview process, which were then explored in depth. An interview was
also conducted with the manager of the shelter, focused on the particular context and
form of the sheltering provided to the residents.
Participants
The purpose of this study was to focus on individual experiences. The sampling
strategies used thus differed from those used in quantitative research, which would have
required a systematic representative statistical sample of the population. The study
maintains the qualitative research objectives of obtaining information and under-
standing a range of opinions and experiences, rather than counting those opinions and
people (Gaskell, 2000). Gaskell argues that selecting a random probability sample is
unsuitable for the purpose of qualitative studies because a given social milieu will
contain only a limited number of views, positions, or experiences. The number of hours
involved in analysing a single interview also limits the number of interviews that can be
completed. The aim was in-depth analysis of content.
Four residents from a shelter for abused women were recruited through direct
solicitation of volunteers by the shelter staff. These respondents represented a non-
probability, purposeful, convenience sample. Each woman’s admission into the shelter
was based on a claim that she was experiencing an abusive relationship, and that she
had decided to leave the relationship. The length of time women had been in abusive
relationships extended between almost one to eight years. Although each woman had
been subjected to physical, sexual, economic, and emotional abusive behaviours
(Kirkwood, 1997), in each case the escalation of the physical abuse combined with
another form of abuse was instrumental in the leaving decision.
The interviews were conducted in English, which was the interviewer’s home
language. Two of the women respondents were South African, of whom one spoke
isiZulu as her home language and the other one referred to herself as ‘white African’.
One woman was a refugee from the Congo, and the other one was a migrant worker
from Zimbabwe. All the women were able to communicate in English to different
degrees of proficiency. The Zulu woman spoke isiZulu and was worried that her
English was not good enough for an interview, while the other South African woman
spoke Afrikaans and English. The Congo refugee’s home language was French but her
proficiency in English and other South African languages was better than the
impression she initially gave. The Zimbabwe migrant worker referred to herself as
‘English Zimbabwean’ and she also spoke the language of her husband’s Shona culture.
The ages of the four respondents were 20, 27, 29, and 41, while the interviewer was in
her late 50s. The educational backgrounds of the participants were diverse. The woman
from Zimbabwe had not finished school and planned to work on her matric through
correspondence courses. For the Congo refugee, it was difficult to assess her level of
education, since she was vague, stating that she had a ‘hostess diploma’ from her
621
The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships
country. The Zulu woman had grade 9 education without further training. The white
African woman had a diploma in business administration; however, she had been
unable to get a job using these skills. The ages, educational, and ethnic backgrounds of
the women in the sample were thus broad, allowing for an inspection of different
experiences with and reactions to abusive relationships. It is important to reiterate that
generalisability of findings was not a focal objective of the study. Rather, what is
emphasised and discussed are the shared meanings of intimate partner violence
experienced by a specific group of women at a shelter, negotiation of the leaving
process, and their perceptions of the utility of a ‘safe house’ or shelter. Thus, while the
backgrounds of the participants may be diverse in relation to education, nationality,
race, and so on, there is still some homogeneity in their constructs and interpretations
of abuse. As expected, this homogeneity is not always consistent, but it is nonetheless
significant in its implications for ways in which women understand their own experience
of abuse and the staying/leaving process.
An interview was also conducted with the shelter manager, who volunteered to give
supporting information on the shelter and formed the fifth participant in the study. The
shelter manager was in her 30s and had been employed at the shelter for two years, first
as a social worker for the children, and then as the shelter manager. She had a degree in
social work. Culture, age, education, and language, as well as reflexivity, may thus have
influenced the quality of the data obtained in the interviews. These factors should be
borne in mind in interpreting the results of this study.
Instruments
Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from all five participants. This
form of interviewing provided a flexible field research technique, enabling the
researcher to focus selectively on issues raised by each participant. It also enabled
the researcher, if necessary, to avoid probing issues that were sensitive to particular
participants, thus protecting the interests of the participants while maintaining a degree
of control over the topics discussed.
A topic guideline (see Appendix) for the interviews was constructed based on the
example presented in Kirkwood’s (1997, p. 159) research, which was adapted based on
a search of the literature. Further modifications and adaptations also took place during
the interview process, as experience with using the instrument was developed in the
field.
Initially, only one instrument was constructed, for use with the four abused women
respondents. However, a change in focus in the research design took place as a result of
the information obtained during the interviews with the four women. It was found that
interpretation was not possible in the absence of contextual information on the shelter.
An additional interview was thus negotiated with the shelter manager. The additional
interview topic guideline was constructed in a similar format to the one previously
created for the interviews with the four women respondents.
622
Ruth Wright, Peace Kiguwa, and Charles Potter
Setting
The shelter’s exact location and parent organisation need to be kept confidential for the
safety and privacy of current and future residents. It was a residential home located in a
major urban setting, and had been in operation for a number of years at the time the
research was conducted. Its capacity was about ten women with their children. The
shelter staff consisted of one manager (social worker), one social worker, and two
housemothers. The length of stay for those seeking shelter was normally between one
and six months. The cost of the shelter stay for those employed was 50 rands per
month, and no cost for those unemployed.
The advantages of conducting the interviews in this setting were that the women were
in a familiar, safe place to relive painful, traumatic experiences and feelings, and if they
required assistance, their counsellors would be available. The interviews took place in
the office building in the back garden.
Procedure
Prior to conducting the interviews, approval for the research and the instruments
constructed was secured from the appropriate university committees as well as the
shelter manager. Arrangements with the shelter manager were then made to conduct the
interviews at a time convenient for the participants and the shelter staff. Both verbal
and written consent was obtained from the participants in the study. In addition, the
participants were made aware of their right to terminate the interviews at any time, and
assurances of confidentiality were given. The purpose of the study and the recording
procedure were verbally explained. Copies of the information letter and topic guide
were then given to the participant, along with verbal explanations. The participants
were encouraged to voice any concerns and questions they had about the research.
Measures were taken in attempting to put the participants at ease to counteract social
norms encouraging abused women to be silent. As anticipated, the participants did at
various times test the interviewer’s sincerity, interest, and dependability.
All the interviews were conducted on a one-to-one basis, each interview being audio-
taped for later transcription. On average, the interviews with the women lasted
approximately ninety minutes. The interview with the shelter manager lasted over two
hours. This enabled probing to take place, and also ensured that sufficient time and
space was provided for the participants’ stories to emerge.
The narrative process emerged at different times within each interview, and the
involvement of the participant in telling her personal story was taken as an indicator of
a successful interview. Initially, a great number of yes and no answers were given in
response to questions. Once the ice had been broken, the personal narrative would
normally emerge, followed by probing, which in each case was thorough. Some
exasperation by the women was noted with the resultant length of time taken to
complete the interview topics. However, this was unlikely to have affected the quality of
623
The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships
the women’s narratives, which were recorded prior to subsequent probing, and
generally early in the interview process.
The participants were encouraged to seek help from the shelter staff if the re-telling of
their stories resulted in later emotional upheaval. The women were thanked for their
time and the sharing of their stories, and for participating in the research. Field notes
were then made immediately after each interview to supplement the audio-tapes in
recording non-verbal behaviours.
Data analysis
The audio-tapes of the interviews and field notes were transcribed to paper copies and
onto a portable computer disk, maintaining where possible the exact words used by the
interviewees, including pauses and non-verbal communications. The transcriptions
were organised in the same manner as the topic guidelines.
Data analysis was conducted through progressive use of three approaches, namely
interpretative phenomenology, content analysis, and social construction. These three
approaches were used to enable the researcher to familiarise herself with the data, prior
to answering the research questions.
The first step in the data analysis followed the steps for interpretative phenomen-
ological analysis, as outlined by Willig (2001), to focus initially on the impressions of the
content of the text. This involved examining the women’s narratives to establish how they
made sense of and interpreted their world as entangled in violence and abuse. In the
process, the specific context, time, quality, and texture of each woman’s experience were
identified, as outlined in her responses to the open-ended questions in the interviews.
It was assumed at this first stage in the analysis that the interactive characteristics of
the social world were important elements in each woman’s life-world, giving meaning to
events in her life. Additionally, it was acknowledged that the researcher’s own view of
the world and the relationship between the researcher and the participant had been
implicated in the process, limiting the researcher’s access to a full understanding. The
subsequent steps in the analysis thus involved progressive focusing on themes in the
narratives, which were then explored in depth.
The second step thus involved focusing on specific themes in the women’s narratives,
which were identified through a process of content analysis. The topic guidelines
formed the preliminary schemes. This was done as the questions in each interview
schedule had been based on prior categories obtained from analysis of the literature and
prior research. From these standard categories, additional categories were then
identified in each woman’s narrative.
Descriptive coding and latent coding were done through the use of paper/pencil
coding on code sheets. This was essentially a subjective process in which the researcher
first overviewed the content of the text and then conducted coding and interpretation.
In the process, clear word definitions were first established and then tested against the
data, being either modified or maintained. The themes identified at this stage of the
624
Ruth Wright, Peace Kiguwa, and Charles Potter
analysis were then compared with findings of a large South African survey (Rasool,
Vermaak, Pharoah, Louw, & Stavrou, 2002), to establish whether the specific
contextual themes identified in the participants’ narratives were similar to those of a
wider group of abused women in South Africa.
The third step in the analysis involved examination of the themes against a
background of social theory, in attempting to establish whether there were particular
social constructs or structures that were instrumental in maintaining or resisting
domestic violence in this particular social milieu. Throughout the research literature,
particular discursive positions are allotted to domestic violence and abused women
through culture, historical times, contextual factors, and language. The themes from the
interview data were thus examined for the presence or absence of the discursive
positions established in the literature review.
The final step in the analysis then involved establishing the relationship between the
themes identified through the different steps of the analysis and the research questions,
both within the narratives of the individual interviewees and across the different
interview protocols. This involved analysis of commonalties and differences in ways in
which the women described and voiced their experiences of sheltering, against the
background of theory.
To answer the first research question, numerous theories were drawn on to establish
aetiology of abusive relationships. This involved examining psychological, social-
psychological, and social-cultural factors, which could be possible explanations for the
significance attributed to the types of abuse experienced by the women. The theoretical
frameworks of Dobash and Dobash (1992), Lempert (1996), and Green (1999) were
used to establish how different issues and responses had influenced each woman’s
decision-making process, relative to the decision to leave the abusive male partner and
the decision to seek sheltering.
To identify the reaction of each of the women to the support provided by the shelter as
elicited in research question two, the work of Dobash and Dobash (1992), Loseke (1992),
Kirkwood (1997), andPark et al. (2000)was used as a theoretical framework for analysing
the functionality of shelters for abused women. Finally, for research question three, the
stages of empowerment identified in Kirkwood’s research were used to establish whether
empowerment could be attributed to the sheltering process for these women.
Ethical considerations
Prior to conducting the interviews, approval for the study and the instruments was
secured from the Human Research Ethics Committee and the research manager for the
shelter organisation. The recommended changes made by the ethics committee were
implemented. To guarantee informed consent for voluntary participants, two consent
forms were prepared and approved. An information letter was given to each woman,
outlining the purpose of the research and the procedures to be taken. This was
reinforced with a verbal explanation. The participants were given the opportunity to
625
The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships
read the topic guide for the interview and to ask any questions before starting the
interview. The women were also informed of the true nature and purpose of the study,
making sure each was fully aware of the purpose and aims of the study, and
understanding what she was agreeing to. Although none of the women interviewed
asked for therapeutic counsel, a skilled counsellor was available on the premises,
provided by the shelter. A debriefing session was also held after the interviews.
RESULTS
Why do women seek assistance in sheltering?
In order to examine why sheltering at this point became an option for the women, the
inquiry took three different but interconnected routes. The first route examined the
possible causes for the abusive relationships. The second investigated the significance of
the types of abuse experienced, while the third established what kinds of response were
available for each woman in the context of her particular aetiology of abuse. Table 1
shows a summary of the accounts of the women, indicating the presence of both
individual and shared aetiologies for abuse.
Table 1. Individual and shared aetiologies for abuse
Shared causes
Psychological
causes
Immature poor communication skills between partners in which violencewas used as a powerful coercion tool and a process to resolve conflict.The undermining of women’s self-confidence; self-esteem by male partners.
The women experiencing feelings of guilt, shame, embarrassment, and/orresponsibility, leading to further isolation and vulnerability.
Learned behaviour led to silence about beatings, defeating intervention.The men’s use of the women’s core identity as woman/wife/mother toattack them through criticism, humiliation, belittlement, ridicule, name-calling, and making fun of their lack of skills and knowledge.
Social-
psychological
causes
High level of tolerance for physical abuse by the women and in the socialenvironment, with low risk of intervention, therefore men beat theirpartners because they could.No attempts to hide evidence of beatings, instead the evidence appears totake on a badge of ownership.Forced isolation and privacy of family environment.Access to resources controlled by males and used as controlling lever.
Extreme jealousy and possessiveness, involving autonomy-limitingbehaviours and/or tight vigilance on women’s activities, were exploited asan illustration of love and reasons for the violence by both partners.Dependency on male partner for housing and financial support.
Poor knowledge and use of informal and formal social support networks.Presence of children.Urban, nuclear family setting with female isolated from extended family.
Influence of male partners’ extended families.
626
Ruth Wright, Peace Kiguwa, and Charles Potter
Social-cultural
causes
Predominance of patriarchal ideology: male supreme authority; right tophysically punish female partners; subordinate role of women, treated asproperty or possession; women subjected to expectations of male partner;women’s belief in roles and family structures defining ‘good wife andmother’; tactics of domination used by the male partners.Conflict over sex and children.
Trust and belief in romantic love and religious sanction of marriage used bymale partners to keep the women in the relationship.Unemployment or low wages of male partner.Poverty.Social conditions that promote violence against women such as culture ofviolence, high tolerance for violence, inability or reluctance of women touse legal/police resources, and ineffectiveness of police.
Individual causes
Psychologicalcauses
Individual pathology: depression, shyness, withdrawal, low self-esteem,insecurity, anxiety, hopelessness, suicidal, and/or dependency.
Experience with abuse in formative years, causing vulnerability later.Child in position of danger.Male partner suffering from alcoholism.
Fear of abandonment in male partner, causing inability to controlaggression and rage.
Sole financial provider for family a source of self-confidence and self-esteem but also instrumental in the continued abuse.
Social-
psychologicalcauses
Youth and inexperience with older male partner.For older women, years invested in the relationship and the problems ofstarting over.Ability to provide accommodation tied to husband’s continued demandsand abuse.Husband able to force his wife to live with him through threats of killing thewoman and their children.
Social-cultural
causes
Poor education opportunities for black women, leading to pooremployment prospects.Status of migrant worker and refugee leading to vulnerability.
With reference to patriarchal theory, all the sources of conflict leading to violence in
intimate relationships identified by Dobash and Dobash (1992) and Fedler and Tanzer
(2000) were present in the accounts of the women. These factors were aggravated by their
socialisation, which led them to believe and trust in the nurturing role of women, romantic
love, and the religious sanction of marriage. There was also evidence of a need to find
excuses for such behaviours so that the women could maintain their roles of ‘good wife/
mother’. Consequently, although the interview data portrayed images of coercive,
physically abusive relationships to one listening to their stories, the women themselves
didnot strongly identifywith the label of ‘abused/batteredwife’.All fourwomenconsidered
themselves tobe ‘survivors’ in the reality of their lives, and identified stronglywith this label.
Feminist literature has argued it is important for any abused woman to take on survivor
roles as part of the discursive shift that enables her to go beyond the abusive relationship to
re-establish herself as a human being worthy of love and self-autonomy:
627
The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships
He never treated me like he should treat a woman. (Clara)I want to spare this baby . . . be a good role model for my little girl. (Dora)
Responses to abuse
Theoretically, the women’s responses to abuse were consistent with Lempert’s (1996)
stages. Each of the women attempted to satisfy her partner’s demands and expectations.
Each woman would use cognitive, dissociation, subordination, non-confrontational,
non-threatening, and problem-solving strategies. Staying/leaving behaviours were used
as negotiating strategies by three of the women (Dobash & Dobash, 1992). However,
few traditional African strategies (Green, 1999) were identified, indicating that the
option of using their extended families as a resource was not available to them. The
presence of a paradigmatic shift or last-straw event (Rosen & Stith, 1995) for each of
the women was tied not to the increased severity of the physical abuse but to the
combining of other forms of abuse with the physical abuse; thus instigating an
immediate leaving decision:
This time my husband was beating my little girl so badly that the school phoned CPU[Child Protection Unit]. And they came and arrested my husband. I then I decided it wastime for me to leave . . . for my daughter. (Dora)Me, yes, I loved him but [. . .] No, not now, not now. I finished to love him . . . when hestarted forcing me to have sex. (Amy)
Did the shelter experience meet the expectations and needs of thewomen?
The nature of the shelter’s ability to provide support for the women was gauged from
the accounts of the four women respondents, examined in conjunction with the
interview with the shelter manager. For each of the four women respondents, the shelter
represented a safe place to stay. It met their basic needs for survival, accommodation,
food, and support. The availability of a shelter made the process to leave easier. Given
the traditions and cultural background of each of the women, it is of interest on a cross-
cultural level that the manner in which the women came to the shelter was similar to
that reported in a number of Western societies. However, what was apparently different
in South Africa was the absence of self-referrals to the shelter commonly found in
Western societies (Lawless, 2001; Loseke, 1992). Table 2 highlights further significant
differences between Western-style shelters and the particular shelter that is the object of
study.
628
Ruth Wright, Peace Kiguwa, and Charles Potter
Table 2. Similarities and differences between the shelter studies and Western-style
shelters
Similarities to Western-style shelters Differences from Western-style shelters
Safety — a place free from abuse and violence Shelter services not as widely known in thecommunity; therefore referrals made throughother community services rather than self-referrals.
Basic needs for survival, shelter, food, andsupport are met.
Increased government controls as a result ofrequiring increased government funding.
Children stay with the mother when possible. Flexible, evolving process in meeting socialneeds of the community, not a rigid feministor therapeutic ideology.
Staffed by professionally trained staff. Individual counselling as the main therapeuticobjective rather than combined withcompulsory group sessions.
Professional counselling for mother and child. Fewer restrictions.
Funding through government and non-government agencies.
Race, socio-economic, and ethnic diversitycatered for.
Funding problems. Little emphasis on ‘good client’, insteadallowing the women to decide what their needsare, and admitting any woman in dangerwhether or not she is ready to leave theabusive relationship.
House rules similar. ‘Time out’ or ‘cooling down’ acceptablereasons for admission to shelter.
Safety problems.
Although all the women respondents reported feeling safe in the shelter, the shelter
manager reported that security still posed a problem similar to that reported in other
shelters worldwide. Nevertheless, sheltering for these abused women was able to fill
gaps in social support and provision, which have been exacerbated in South Africa by
the dynamics of a society in transition. The women’s stories illustrated legitimate cases
of domestic abuse, the need for the women to escape the abusive environment, and the
community’s inability to respond on levels of family and traditional controls:
If you were married in my country, if you are fighting you go to your families. Bothfamilies would meet and they would talk about. (Amy)I trying to call people, neighbours, but no one help me. (Beth)
The results also confirmed past findings (Loseke, 1992) in indicating that women come
to shelters anticipating that the shelter will meet a wide diversity of expectations and
needs. The type of flexible response provided by the shelter staff appeared to contribute
to a positive shelter experience by each of the women interviewed. The data indicated
that the shelter adopted a mixture of therapeutic and activist approaches, involving not
just the containment of the social problem but also encompassing individual and social
change. It therefore created a specific experience for these women based on a mental
health approach in which professional counselling formed the main intervention
629
The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships
strategy. Each of the women reported benefiting from the counselling, suggesting the
value of this form of social support.
I am not a very forceful person. They help me to say no to something I don’t like. I talkabout it if something happens now. (Amy)When I am going to group sessions, sharing problems . . . I feel alright [. . .] express howfeel, if not right, you talk. (Dora)I want to continue with counselling. I still can come back when I need to talk. (Beth)Sometimes I get very frustrated . . . [. . .] I get counselling and it helps . . . just talking. (Clara)
Did the women experience empowerment and agency through theshelter stay?
In addition to their support functions, shelters have been theorised as significant
empowering and agency tools for abused women. Kirkwood (1997) has argued that
empowerment for abused women takes place in stages. The first stage is coping with the
abuse. The second is acknowledging its effects on freedom and control over one’s life.
The third stage involves entering a survival mode. The data from the interviews
indicated that, in the shelter environment, three of the women had entered the second
stage and were fluctuating between acknowledging the effects the abuse and attempting
to find the most appropriate survival mode for their particular needs. One woman
however, remained in the first stage (coping with the abuse):
I suffer in my house, and in my house I suffer. And he beat me. Suffer, wicked man, nomoney. When he does not pay me, you suffer without the money. Now, I don’t knowwhere I going when I finish this shelter. Where I am going, no money. I suffer. (Beth). . . fight, fight, every time fight. Go out and beat me. And go at me every time want tofight me . . . [. . .] He tell me wrong every time. It’s me, I am wrong. When I am talking, meI am wrong. [Silence] . . . marriage is not right for me. I not like it. No, another man, No,No, No, No [Very loud and firmly]. (Beth)I was not allowed to talk about it (the abuse). I was scared, scared that no one wouldbelieve me. But now . . . now I am divorcing him. It is a better life for me. (Amy)My husband said to me ‘you have to choose, it is either me or your family’, and he wanted anaffidavit from me. But I didn’t want to give him an affidavit. I said I would give him one. Iwould support him, just to keep my playing cards open because I was planning to move out.(Dora)
The data further indicated that eachwoman’s psychological presentations of helplessness,
depression, anger, hopelessness, and anxiety were possible influences in her abilities to
move beyond the abuse. Other factors noted in the interview data included the continued
influence of the abusive partner, limited supportive social network and social services, and
responsibility for children. The patriarchal subject positions of ‘good wife and mother’
influenced the way in which the women defined their positions within their relationships
with their partners, their marriage, and their community. However, it was also clear that
their abilities to challenge the culturally assigned subject positions were severely
obstructed by extreme fear and the need for survival.
630
Ruth Wright, Peace Kiguwa, and Charles Potter
Within the context of domestic violence, Kirkwood (1997) identified in her research
three levels in which abused women move towards empowerment. On the first level, the
women had been denied or restricted in obtaining practical resources and knowledge to
secure their independence. Maslow’s theory of self-actualisation (Kaplan & Sadock,
1988) points to the sequence of stages that must occur before the individual reaches
ultimate functioning levels. For the women interviewed, the inability to obtain the basic
survival-oriented needs such as shelter, food, and physical and emotional safety had
seriously hindered their abilities towards self-actualisation and eventually empowerment.
Kirkwood’s second level points to the need to break the silence imposed on women.
The ability to share stories of abuse among women is seen as an important empowering
aspect of sheltering. The breaking of the ‘silence’ is essential in negotiating for a non-
violent relationship or moving out of it. The women’s stories legitimised their admission
to the shelter and their descriptions as battered wives. Through the sharing, the women
developed awareness that they were not alone, but for these women there appeared to
be only a minimal decrease in their sense of isolation and embarrassment. Two of the
women were comfortable in sharing their stories within the shelter environment. The
other two stated that they were unable to share their experiences with the other women,
but had been able to do so with the shelter staff. At the beginning of the interviews,
three of the women demonstrated a certain amount of hesitation and shyness. However,
as the interviews proceeded, the women became more spontaneous, gave fuller answers,
and were more confident in expressing their opinions and describing their experiences.
Lawless (2001) claims that the act of speaking out allows women to reconstruct self in
moving beyond the identity of a battered woman to articulate a new empowered self.
Two of the women moved away from their responsibilities to their husbands to identify
their roles as mothers as the most significant position for their futures. One woman’s
enthusiasm in finding a new career path indicated her belief in an attainable new self:
I am taking my daughter home (to Zimbabwe) . . . so that I will be free to continue myeducation . . . I have a certificate now . . . and I am training to become communityresource worker . . . I am still going to counselling even when I leave this place (the shelter). . . but at least . . . I am taking a good step for myself now. (Amy)
DISCUSSION
Although the finding of a study based on self-reports of five volunteers cannot be
generalised, this study highlights a number of important issues in the complex nature of
domestic violence and its impact on women’s lives.
Empowerment and agency
A number of factors influencing empowerment and agency have been identified in
previous Western research (Kirkwood, 1997; Lawless, 2001). The data from this study
631
The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships
would suggest that the ability of women to take up sheltering opportunities in South
Africa is aggravated by severe social conditions connected to poverty and discrimina-
tion. The shelter environment offered access to resources and information not
previously accessible to each of the four women interviewed. It also offered the
opportunity of exposure to a different way of acknowledging and voicing the abuse,
which may in future allow for empowerment.
However, while the shelter played a successful role in enabling the women to obtain
the practical necessities they required to avoid a situation of severe domestic abuse, as
well as in providing a space for recovery and thus enabling the women to move beyond
their abusive relationships and gradually take control over their lives, it is difficult to
determine what longer term empowerment has been nurtured, if at all. Given the
obvious limitation of a small sample that is largely based on self-report responses, as
well as the multiplicity of identities that intersect, such as race, socio-economic position,
and culture, empowerment at an individual level remains difficult to fully ascertain. It is
hoped that the present study highlights the necessity of being more cognisant of
women’s responses to abuse that go beyond denial or rejection of the abuse, and may
rather involve also the active ‘taking on’ of identities that influence the staying/leaving
process.
LIMITATIONS AND INDICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH
This study has a number of limitations. The shelter sample was essentially selective,
volunteer, and non-random. The data collection procedure involved interviews, and
involved self-reports, which may have introduced bias into the data. As it was not
possible to involve the respective male partners in the study, it was not possible to
compare the women’s reports with their male partners’ perspectives. Cultural, age,
educational, and language factors, as well as issues of reflexivity, may also have
influenced the interview process.
The analysis of the data was subjective, and may thus have been open to alternative
interpretations. The transcriptions, for example, all contained a large number of ‘yes/
no’ answers. This was an indication that each of the subjects imposed limitations on her
responses to the interview questions for possibly different reasons, affecting the quality
and continuity of the stories, and the narrative quality of the data obtained.
Despite these limitations, this study indicates the importance of conducting similar
research in this area in the future. One avenue for future research would be to focus on
the staying-leaving-returning decisions of abused women. This would assist in
developing understanding of why women remain in abusive relationships, and the
factors in specific social, family, and societal contexts that contribute to decisions to
stay or leave. Such studies are necessary so that interventions can be designed to
support abused women in particular communities.
632
Ruth Wright, Peace Kiguwa, and Charles Potter
APPENDIX: TOPIC GUIDE FOR INTERVIEWS WITH PARTICIPANTS
Personal history
Age
Employment history
Parent’s employment
Ethnicity
Education
Training
Children: Ages & Sex
Who do they live with?
Are they children of abusive
partner?
Relationship status:
Married: living together / not
Divorced
Friend: living together / not
Age when met partner
How long together?
Objections to relationship:
From whom / why?
Able to maintain friendships
during relationship? Why /
why not?
Employed during
relationship
Any financial problems in
relationship
Type of housing: owned /
rented / lived with others
Abuse
How was conflict resolved:
In your family growing up
In your present relationship
How do you define abuse?
Acceptable not
What have you experienced
as abuse?
In childhood / dating /
adolescent / in your
present relationship
Mental abuse
Physical abuse
Sexual abuse
Financial abuse
Resulting injuries
When and why did the abuse
occur in your present
relationship?
First attack
First seen as abuse
How often Patterns in
abuser’s behaviour
Related to substance abuse
Changes over time and
marital status
Have your children
witnessed the abuse?
How did you feel about this?
Notice any change in their
behaviour?
Reaction to abuse
Silence — why?
Your reactions to the abuse:
Emotional / physical
Ways tried to stop attacks or
abuse: physical / verbal /
emotional
How successful were the
attempts?
Did the feelings change over
time –
About the abuse?
About self?
About partner?
Children’s reactions?
Whom did you tell about the
abuse?
Reactions of friends and
family?
People contacted for help
Service agencies contacted:
Responses of
Leaving
Why did you decide to leave?
Change in feelings
Still love your partner
Specific event or
circumstance
Sudden or planned for
Who contacted for help in
leaving?
Family / friends / agencies
What kind of help asked for?
What responses were most
helpful?
Were you aware of your
options?
Ever return to partner after
leaving?
Why?
Fear of reprisals?
From abuser / family /
friends
Shelter
Use of shelter services
before:
Why / When?
How did you find out about
the shelter?
Through other women
Other community services
Written information
Availability of shelter: did it
affect your decision to stay
/ leave? How?
Do you feel safe?
What services have been
most helpful?
Emergency accommodation
Counselling
Group discussions
Educational programmes:
Assertiveness training
Parenting skill
Problem-solving skills
Job / computer skills
Arts / crafts
Life skills
Job search / CV writing
Legal assistance
Medical referrals
Financial aid
Information: social
assistance
Women’s rights
Resources
Child care
633
The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships
Help with paper work
involvedWhat services not availablewould you like to have?
What information was mostuseful?
What services / informationgave you the feeling that
you could regain yourindependence / control ofyour life?
Do you feel free to talkabout your abusiverelationship in the shelter?
Does the presence of otherwomen with sameexperiences help?
Having difficulty:
With lack of privacy?With shelter rules?With sharing facilities?
With other’s lifestyles /cultural behaviours?
Some describe sheltering as
exchanging one prison foranother — is this so foryou?
How is conflict resolved in
shelter?
Effective / not?
Is there too much anti-male
prejudice?
Is the shelter a culture-
relevant environment for
your needs?
Language / food / religion
Are your privacy and
confidentiality
maintained?
Cultural beliefs
Role of women
Role of men
How are these beliefs formed
in your culture?
Does role definition
contribute to violence in
the family?
Are marriage bonds sacred,
not to be broken? Under
what conditions can be
broken?
Must you always listen to,
obey your partner?
Is marriage important to
you?
Is loyalty to family / husband
important?
How are decisions made in
your home?
Does your community
practise non-interference
in relations between
husband and wife?
Do you share household
chores / child care?
Religion: healing — source
of support / guilt / defines
your role as mother / wife?
Enforce marital controls?
Are culture values changing?
How?
Do you see yourself as
‘battered’?
Do you see yourself as a
survivor / victim / neither?
What are your hopes,
desires, ambitions for the
future?
REFERENCES
Angless, T., & Maconachie, M. (1996). Battered women: Problems and proposals. In L.
Glanz & A. Spiegel (Eds.), Violence and family life in contemporary South Africa (pp.
151–164). Pretoria: HSRC Press.
Campbell, J., Rose, L., Kub, J., & Nedd, D. (1998). Voices of strength and resistance: A
contextual and longitudinal analysis of women’s responses to battering. Journal of
Interpersonal Violence, 13(6), 743–762.
Carlson, B. (1984). Causes and maintenance of domestic violence: An ecological
analysis. Social Service Review (December), 569–587.
Choice, P., & Lamke, L. (1997). A conceptual approach to understanding abused
women’s stay/leave decisions. Journal of Family Issues, 18(3), 290–314.
Dangor, Z., Fedler, J., & Park, Y. (2000). Introduction. In Y. Park, J. Fedler, & Z.
Dangor (Eds.), Reclaiming women’s spaces: New perspectives on violence against
women and sheltering in South Africa (pp. 11–14). Johannesburg: NISAA Institute for
Women’s Development.
634
Ruth Wright, Peace Kiguwa, and Charles Potter
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence, and social change. London:
Routledge.
Dwyer, D., Smokowski, P., Bricout, J., & Wodarski, J. (1996). Domestic violence and
woman battering: Theories and practice implications. In A. Roberts (Ed.), Helping
battered women: New perspectives and remedies (pp. 67–81). New York: Oxford
University Press.
Eisikovits, Z., Goldblatt, H., & Winstok, Z. (1999). Partner accounts of intimate
violence: Towards a theoretical model. Families in Society: The Journal of
Contemporary Human Services, 80(6), 606–619.
Fedler, J., & Tanzer, Z. (2000). A world in denial: International perspectives on
violence against women. In Y. Park, J. Fedler, & Z. Dangor (Eds.), Reclaiming
women’s spaces: New perspectives on violence against women and sheltering in South
Africa (pp. 17–46.) Johannesburg: NISAA Institute for Women’s Development.
Foreman, S., & Dallos, R. (1993). Domestic violence. In R. Dallos & E. McLaughlin
(Eds.), Social problems and the family (pp. 7–45). London: Sage.
Gaskell, G. (2000). Individual and group interviewing. In M. Bauer & G. Gaskell
(Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image, and sound: A practical handbook (pp.
38–56). London: Sage.
Goodman, L., Koss, M., Fitzgerald, L., Russo, N., & Keita, G. (1993). Male violence
against women: Current research and future directions. American Psychologist,
48(10), 1054–1058.
Green, D. (1999). Gender violence in Africa: African women’s responses. London:
Macmillan.
Johnson, H. (1998). Rethinking survey research on violence against women. In R. E.
Dobash & R. P. Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 23–51).
London: Sage.
Kaplan, H., & Sadock, B. (1988). Synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences clinical
psychiatry (5th ed.). Baltimore, OH: Williams & Wilkins.
Kirkwood, C. (1997). Leaving abusive partners: From the scars of survival to the
wisdom for change. London: Sage.
Lawless, E. (2001). Women escaping violence: Empowerment through narrative.
Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
Lawson, D. (2003). Incidence, explanations, and treatment of partner violence. Journal
of Counseling and Development, 81 (Winter), 19–32.
Lempert, L. (1996). Women’s strategies for survival: Developing agency in abusive
relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 11(3), 269–289.
Long, C, & Zietkiewicz, E. (2006). Going Places: Black women negotiating race and
gender in post-apartheid South Africa. In T. Shefer, F. Boonzaier, & P. Kiguwa
(Eds.), The gender of psychology (pp. 198–219). Cape Town: UCT Press.
Loseke, D. (1992). Battered women and shelters: The social construction of wife abuse.
Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
635
The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships
Lucas, W. (1974a). The case-survey method: Aggregating case experience. Santa
Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Lucas, W. (1974b). The case survey and alternative methods for research aggregation.
Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
MacMillan, R., & Gartner, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force
participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage
and Family, 61(November), 947–958.
McWilliams, M. (1998). Violence against women in societies under stress. In R. E.
Dobash & R. P. Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 111–140).
London: Sage.
Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative
approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Park, Y., Shaik, F., & Rasool, S. (2000). Indigenous sanctuaries: A global view of
shelters for abused women. In Y. Park, J. Fedler, & Z. Dangor (Eds.), Reclaiming
women’s spaces: New perspectives on violence against women and sheltering in South
Africa (pp. 209–238). Johannesburg: NISAA Institute for Women’s Development.
Ramazanoglu, C., & Holland, J. (1993). Women’s sexuality and men’s appropriation of
desire. In C. Ramazanoglu (Ed.), Up against Foucault: Explorations of some tensions
between Foucault and feminism (pp. 239–261). London: Routledge.
Rasool, S., Vermaak, K., Pharoah, R., Louw, A., & Stavrou, A. (2002). Violence
against women: A national survey. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies.
Riger, S. (1993). What’s wrong with empowerment. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 21(3), 279–293.
Rosen, K., & Stith, S. (1995). Women terminating abusive dating relationships: A
qualitative study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(1), 155–160.
Rusbult, C., & Martz, J. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment
model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 21(6), 558–571.
Simons, R., Lin, K., & Gordon, L. (1998). Socialization in the family of origin and male
dating violence: A prospective study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 467–
478.
Sorenson, S. (1996). Violence against women: Examining ethnic differences and
commonalities. Evaluation Review, 20(2), 123–145.
Vetten, L. (2000). Gender, race, and power dynamics in the face of social change:
Deconstructing violence against women in South Africa. In Y. Park, J. Fedler, & Z.
Dangor, (Eds.), Reclaiming women’s spaces: New perspectives on violence against
women and sheltering in South Africa (pp. 47–80). Johannesburg: NISAA Institute for
Women’s Development.
Wallace, H. (1998). Victimology: Legal, psychological, and social perspectives. Boston,
MA: Allyn & Bacon.
636
Ruth Wright, Peace Kiguwa, and Charles Potter
Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory
and method. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1998). Lethal and nonlethal violence against wives and the
evolutionary psychology of male sexual proprietariness. In R. E. Dobash & R. P.
Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 199–230). London: Sage.
Wright, R. (2006). The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by
abusive relationships. Unpublished master’s research report, University of the
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
637
The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships
Top Related