SYRO-PALESTINE IN THE FIRST MILLENIUM BCE:
WHO WERE THE ANCIENT ISRAELITES?
Riana McArthur
14447088
Module 5: Syro-Palestine – Everyday life in ancient Israel
Prof. P. Kruger
12 March 2012
1
INDEX
1. Introduction 2
2. Sources: how to find information on ancient Israel 2
3. Israel's climate, topography and ecology 3
4. Historic overview: who were the ancient Israelites? 4
5. A day in the life of ancient Israel 6
5.1. The role of families, clans and villages 7
5.2. Religion: Who did the Israelites worship? 9
5.3. Housing: Where did the ancient Israelites live? 14
5.4. Food and Diet: What did the Israelites eat? 16
5.5. Health and illness in ancient Israel 18
5.6. Dress and adornment 21
5.7. Arts and creativity 24
5.8. Education, literacy and language 29
5.9. Trade and commerce: How did the Israelites survive? 32
5.10. Warfare: An ordinary aspect of ancient Israelite existence 35
6. Conclusion 41
Bibliography
2
1. Introduction
The ancient Israelites have always intrigued scholars as well as any individual interested
in the history of ancient times (Herr 1997:115). Many scholars and treasure hunters,
pilgrims and archaeologists have attempted to see if what lies beneath the Holy Land
corresponds to what is written in the Hebrew Bible. Scholars aim to answer questions like
'what was life in ancient Israel like?', 'where did the Israelites live, what did they eat and
what did they wear?', 'what sociopolitical features guided their behaviour?' and 'how did
they interact with each other and with foreigners? Answers to these questions are not
always easy as Herr (1997:117) notes that when studying any culture, it is important to
bear in mind the effect of 'punctuated equilibrium'. This is seen in long periods of time
that pass with somewhat little change in the material culture whilst 'punctuated' periods of
sudden bursts in material culture occur. This all takes place while not denying that steady
change could also take place.
This study aims to find answers to the questions posed above and to understand daily life
in ancient Israel. Furthermore, this project wants to ascertain the nature of the interaction
between factors that influenced the Israelite culture as well as determining which factors
had the most impact on the same. In order to fully understand a day in the life of ancient
Israel it is necessary to first have a brief look at the sources that provide us with the
information necessary to construct this out of the ordinary history.
2. Sources: how to find information on ancient Israel
To reconstruct daily life during any historical period, one needs to identify the proper
sources (Borowski 2003:10). But where do we find information on ancient Israel that
goes back over 3,000 years? Isserlin (1998:10) and King and Stager (2001:1) note that
archaeological and epigraphic evidence together with ethnography, wall paintings and
iconography as well as inscribed reliefs and seals from foreign countries provide us with
rich information on the ancient Israelite society. Nevertheless, the Hebrew Bible is
treated as the primary source as it contains valuable information on daily life in antiquity;
however it is necessary for these sources to be approached as a whole in order to obtain
insight into the ancient Israelite society (Herr 1997:115). Reader to note that the majority
3
of literature relating to the ancient Israelites developed during the time of the Monarchy
in Iron Age II and as a result will form the focus of this study (Herr 1997:117).
3. Israel's climate, topography and ecology
In order to obtain a picture of what daily life in ancient Israel was like, it is necessary to
understand the influence that the region, which was geographically, topgraphically as
well as ecologically diverse, had a substantial impact on the development of the Israelite
culture (Borowksi 2003:1,6; Herr 1997:124-125; King & Stager 2001:86-87). For
instance, the rock-strewn mountains, although inhospitable for agriculture, provided
ample grazing for goats and sheep, and valleys such as Beth-Shea and Jezreel not only
provided an ideal place for Israelites to meet it also allowed the Israelites to produce vast
surpluses of lentils, chickpeas as well as barley and wheat. Furthermore, the excellent
soil on the hillsides, when deforested and replaced with artificial terraces, allowed the
Israelites to produce orchards whilst the high plateau in Transjordan provided the
Israelites with basalt, limestone and wood which could be used in construction activities.
Perennial springs such as Gihon and fresh lakes such as Lake Huleh provided the
inhabitants with fresh water and resulted in the formation of settlements near the same.
Droughts and diseases were common and resulted in the Israelites relying heavily on the
rainy seasons for their agricultural activities.
Not only did the region support the Israelites' basic needs, it also assisted them in their
social, political and economic needs (Borowski 2003:44-46; Herr 1997:124-125). For
example, the region allowed the Israelites to build country roads which encouraged
communication between the villages. As society advanced royal and regional cities such
as Jerusalem, Samaria, Megiddo and Lachish were also positioned near these major trade
routes. It is clear that Israel provided its inhabitants with a multitude of natural resources
and opportunities which could have been used to everyone's advantage. As a result it is
fitting for the Bible to describe Canaan as "…a land of wheat and barley, of vines and fig
trees and pomegranates, a land of olive trees and honey, a land where you [Israelites]
may eat bread without scarcity" (King & Stager 2001:85-86; see also Deuteronomy 8:8-
9).
4
4. Historic overview: who were the Israelites?
Before the various facets of ancient Israel can be unpacked, a brief overview of where the
Israelites originated is necessary. Isserlin (1998:48, 51, 111) however notes that although
the existence of the ancient Israelites is common knowledge their origin remains difficult
to understand. While scholars disagree about in which century BCE the Israelites
originated, they have concur that the ancient Israelites are the successors of Abraham
who formed a nation of people who believed in their One God.
In ca.1600 BCE a famine forced the nomadic Israelites out of Canaan into Egypt where
they remained for over 400 years (Isserlin 1998:50). Here they endured hardship and
were forced into slavery by the Egyptian pharaoh Ramses II, however Moses and his
brother Aaron were chosen by God to set the Israelites free and to take them to their
Promised Land (Harper 1896:483). In return, the Israelites had to obey their god and on
Mount Sinai in ca.1200 BCE the Israelites received the Ten Commandments, a tabernacle
together with religious and public laws in order to guide their behaviour. The Israelites
however disobeyed their God's instructions by building a golden calf and as a result were
left to wander in the desert for over 40 years. Their god nevertheless forgave them and
allowed them to enter their Promised Land but upon their return they found their country
inhabited by various ethnicities which included the Amorites, Philistines, Perizittes as
well as Jebusites and Hittites (Borowski 2003:6-10).
By 1,150 BCE the Israelites were dispersed over the
countryside (Isserlin 1998:62-63). They conquered parts
of the land and continued to migrate from one region to
another whilst undersized groups were integrated into
larger groups, resulting in a culturally and ethnically
heterogenous Palestinian world (Isserlin 1998:62-63).
Fig.1. The Merneptah Stele, the earliest record of the name "Israel"
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:Merneptah_Israel_Stele_Cairo.jpg
5
The Merneptah Stele (ca.1210 BCE) is the first ancient artifact to refer to these varied
people and the country as 'Israel' or 'Isrir' and as a result most scholars accept that the
Israelites had a varied origin and developed in the hill country of Judah and Israel during
Iron Age I (Harper 1896:484). Entering their new land was not easy for the Israelites,
however due to their covenant with their One God a strong bond existed between them
which assisted them in the transition into their new lives (Goodspeed 1907:266; Harper
1896:485; Isserlin: 1998:53-54).
Goodspeed (1907:266-267) indicates that the Israelites had to get accustomed to a settled
lifestyle focused on agriculture. They had to learn new activities; they had to form new
social relations; they needed to adjust to new laws, religious ideas and methods of
worship whilst they also had to protect themselves from the assaults of foreigners.
Goodspeed however mentions that although these were difficult times for the Israelites,
the local inhabitants made the adjustment for the Israelites effortless as they not only
introduced them to a more evolved culture, industry and trade; they also exposed them to
literature and various forms of art whilst the Israelites could continue their uncomplicated
faith in their One God, their protector and their guardian of justice.
However due to vast attacks by foreigners and the need for a central authority, the United
Monarchy was established in ca.1020 when Saul bridged the eon between free tribal
organization (Isserlin 1998:8; Master 2001:201; Redford 1973:6). The final establishment
of a full kingdom occurred under King David in ca.1004-965 BCE. David made
Jerusalem the capital of the united Israelites whilst establishing Israel as a major
international power (Paton 1897:24). This endevour resulted in major social, political and
economical changes for ancient Israel which ultimately changed the overall appearance
of the Israelite culture. It was however during the reign of Solomon, David's son (ca.965-
930 BCE) that the social, political as well as economical composition of the Israelite
society reached new heights as the developments metamorphosed the society from a
transhumant existence into a commercially active and prosperous civilization.
6
Unfortunately, the peace and prosperity set up by David and Solomon were abruptly
ended after Solomon's death and the United Monarchy split into two rival states, namely
Judah in the south which lasted 350 years and Israel in the north which lasted more than
200 years (Isserlin 1998:8; Master 2001:201; Redford 1973:6). Due to this fragmentation
in Israelite identity the two states were fragile and open to foreign invasion. At first Israel
was invaded by the Assyrian kings Tiglath-Pileser III (745-727 BCE) and later Sargon II
(ca.722-720 BCE), a period the Nimrud Prism and Great Smmary Inscription show was
characterized by various deportations, almost total eradication of the Israelites in Galilee
and overall destruction, poverty and death (Finkelstein 1999:47; Master 2001:201).
Master (2001:201) notes that this saw Israel degenerating from a prosperous nation to a
vassal state and later to an insignificant and dependent state which was enfolded by
Assyrian districts. These destructive centuries in Israel were followed by the conquest of
Judah by the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar II in 586 BCE who most of the Israelites
to Babylonia and ultimately marked the onset of the Jewish Diaspora (King & Stager
2001:383-387). Joffe (2002:451) notes that it is during this period that the Judean people
started their transformation into Jews as they developed a spiritual as well as a survival
mindset to guide their existence outside their Promised Land whilst instilling a need
amongst everyone to protect the future of their nation.
Unfortunately, the period 536-142 BCE was characterized by further foreign invasion
with Persian as well as Hellenistic rule. As a result, the traditional three-tiered social
hierarchy, from the families to the kings and finally the deity was disrupted (King &
Stager 2001:383).
5. A day in the life of ancient Israel
It is clear that despite appalling situations, which included finding their own identity after
drifting in the desert for a lengthy period of time; adapting to new social settings as well
as foreign attacks, the Israelites had a strong bond and sense of nationalism which
endured for many centuries. But what was daily life like for ancient Israelites? How did
they live? What did they eat and what did they do for entertainment? How did they
7
survive? The discussion below aims to provide answers to the questions posed above and
to provide a holistic synopsis of this captivating ancient culture.
5.1. The role of families, clans and villages
Faust (2000:17), Isserlin (1998:101) and King and Stager (2001:36-40) illustrate that
during biblical times the joint family was the centre of Israelite society around which
religious, social and economic activities took place. Parents had the primary
responsibility to maintain law and order with the father being the ultimate authority. If
matters could not be solved inside the family, the village elders took over in carrying out
justice (Borowski 2003:21-22). The elders assembled at the town gate to discuss matters
and were also involved in military responsibilities. Due to their wisdom, the elderly were
entitled to respect and their responsibility was to transmit the tradition to the community.
Long life, reaching 80 years of age, was seen as a sign of accomplishment, divine
blessing and prominence (King & Stager 2001:58). With the development of urban life,
the office of city elders was developed following the example of village elders.
King and Stager (2001:36-40) and Isserlin (1998:101) indicate that the biblical family
adhered to six social mores and values. At first endogamy, which emphasizes a
preference for marriage between close family members, was prescribed. The families
were also patrilineal, wherein inheritance was kept on the father's side of the family, as
well as patriarchal, wherein the father was the head of the household. Furthermore,
patrilocality was also adhered to as the man brought his wife into his father's family upon
which she became a part of the household. The family was also polygynous, allowing a
husband to have more than one wife. This was mainly due to woman's low life
expectancy and her risk of barrenness (Borowski 2003:81-84). This practice however
occurred more among the elite than the commoners which was evident in the variety of
kings with their harems.
The entire family, old and young, participated in the community and had a specific role to
play which was mostly related to gender. For instance, men attended to military activities
and plowing whilst women helped with childrens' education and agricultural chores
(Borowski 2003:21-25). Although many laws worked against women as they were seen
8
as their husbands' possession, they enjoyed respect at home where they exercised their
authority (Isserlin 1998:102; King & Stager 2001:49-50). Women were also responsible
for providing food and clothing, education to children as well as tended to flocks and
acted as professional mourners (King & Stager 2001:50-52). Women also participated in
daily worship activities, engaged in dancing and singing and played musical instruments.
For example, an ivory pyxis from Nimrud shows female musicians playing a double
flute, hand drum and ten strings on a rectangular frame resembling a zither.
The main motivation for marriage was economic (Borowski 203:81-83; King & Stager
2001:54-56). The main goal was to raise children and to protect family inheritance and
as a result individuals married at an early age. No sexual relations existed before
marriage as the bride was not seen by her husband until their wedding night. The wife
was expected to be a virgin although the husband did not have to adhere to this
requirement. Childbearing started soon after puberty. Divorce was not a common practice
(King & Stager 2001:57). The law of Deuteronomy 24:1-4 gives the husband, and not the
wife, the power to initiate divorce proceedings. This could take place at any time and
without any reasons together with no commitment to provide for the wife. The practice of
levirate was also common (King & Stager 2001:56-57). Should a man die without
children, his brother had he responsibility to take care of the widow for several reasons:
to prevent the widow from marrying outside the family; to carry on the name of the
deceased husband; and to preserve within the family the inherited land of the deceased.
Deuteronomy 25:5-10 shows that the first son borne by the widow was to be considered
the offspring of the deceased husband and not that of his brother (King & Stager
2001:56-57).
The clan which comprised various extended families had more power and was more
important than the family in the social order whilst the individual was at the bottom of the
hierarchy (Faust 2000:17; Isserlin 1998:100-101; King & Stager 2001:36-40). At the top
of the hierarchy however was the tribe which provided overall protection as well as a
sense of identity and tribal honour to the clans and the families. Later in Iron Age II the
state constituted the largest family of all in ancient Israel: the northern Kingdom Israel
was known as the 'household of Omri' whilst the southern Kingdom of Judah was known
as the 'household of David' (King & Stager 2001:39).
9
The discussion above shows that the ancient Israelite society intricately and successfully
linked individual and family needs with those of the clans and the tribes. For instance,
punishment for a variety of private crimes, such as rape and adultery, took place in the
family context whilst crimes such as homosexuality, bestiality and incest were taken care
of by the tribe or administration (King & Stager 2001:59-60). It appears that this level of
interdependence strengthened the bond between, and ultimate survival of, the Israelites.
5.2. Religion: who did the ancient Israelites worship?
Religion played a significant part in ancient Israel (Jeyaraj 2008:137-141,147-148).
During pre-monarchical times religion was simple yet formed the foundation of the
Israelite frame of mind and behaviour. Their reliance on Yahweh was so strong that
despite the presence of numerous foreign cults they believed Yahweh would guide all
their endeavours (Raskovich 1996:449). Schloen (2002:59) notes that the monotheistic
Yahwism intensified in Canaan after the Israelite settlement and that the adoration
continued to intensify with frequent sacrifices of animals and the enjoyment of sacrificial
feasts. As a result, Yahwism strengthened social relationships among the Israelites, the
tribes and provided the Israelites with an opportunity to identify themselves as 'people of
Yahweh'.
However, the Canaanites introduced the Israelites to a very different approach to
monotheism, namely Baalism (Jeyaraj 2008:137). Baalism was associated with a socially
oriented fertility cult which was grounded in agriculture. The cult participated in human
and animal sacrifices to receive rain and food as well as cult prostitution to ensure
fertility among the Canaanites. Overall, the Canaanites believed that Baal, the male god
married to the goddess Ashtoreth, were nature divinities which brought blessing to their
family and crops.
The Israelites noticed the prosperity Canaanites enjoyed due to their religion and over
time became at ease with the cult (Goff 1939:151-152). In due course they attempted to
keep both Yahweh and Baal in their lives, practicing the blend of various ideas and
philosophies whilst transforming the religions according to their own ideas. The Israelites
starting engaging in cult prostitution, child sacrifice and the use of incense, aspects that
10
Yahweh did not approve of (Goff 1939:151-152; see also Genesis 38). This association
with the new cult inevitably negatively influenced the Israelites' conception of Yahweh.
This was followed by an attack by the Midianites and Philistines which the Israelites
perceived as God's wrath for their transgression (Jeyaraj 2008:137-141).
Fig.2. YHWH of Samaria and his Asherah inscription
http://bigbible.org/sansblogue/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Ajrud.jpg
Fig.3. Iron Age Judahite pillar-figurine of fertility deity, possibly Asherah associated with Ba'al.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/30/Asherah.jpg/220px-Asherah.jpg
Fig.4. Offering table at Sarepta, Iron Age II - http://www.bu.edu/anep/SareptaShrine1altar.gif
Fig.5. Iron I Incense burner found at Beth Shan, Stratum V - http://www.bu.edu/anep/incense3.gif
11
During the Monarchy Yahweh played a significant role in Israelite culture again (Jeyaraj
2008:142,149). For instance, Yahweh playing the main role selecting the political leaders
of Israel to the extent that it was the One God, and not a priest, who had the authority to
make this decision. The Israelites also engaged in a variety of Yahwism feasts (King &
Stager 2001:253). For instance The Sabbath, a day of rest and eating, was celebrated to
remember the creation (Exodus 20:8-11) as well as the freedom from slavery in Egypt
(Deuteronomy 5:12-15). Yahwism also influenced the Israelites' belief in the concepts of
'clean' and 'unclean' as it was stipulated in the Bible that whoever was unclean could not
come into contact with the holy: "Put on your beautiful garments, O Jerusalem, the holy
city; for the uncircumsized and the unclean shall enter you no more"(King & Stager
2001:363: see also Isaiah 52:1). The Israelites believed that a person was unclean if the
person had contact with a corpse or any dead animal; if the person had a skin disease; if
the person eats prohibited food as well as when the person has involuntary genital
discharges (King & Stager 2001:362-363).
But the influences of other cults and deities remained
strong. During and after the Monarchy, there is evidence
of the worship of a multitude of deities in Israel as well as
Judah (Herr 1997:141; Joffe 2002:453-454). The temple at
Arad shows that Yahweh had a wife, namely Asherah
(Borowski 2003:24-25). Further evidence was found in
several private homes which contained altars and shrines,
figurines of nude goddesses and amulets which were all
engraved with the names of Yahweh and Asherah. Also,
during the latter part of the Monarchy, zoomorphic and
human fertility figurines frequently occurred in Israelite
cult practices (Herr 1997:161).
Fig.6. The Canaanite god Ba'al, ca.1200 BCE
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Baal_Ugarit_Louvre_AO17330.jpg/180px-
Baal_Ugarit_Louvre_AO17330.jpg
12
Why did such a diversion from a grounded monotheistic Yahwism occur? One can only
postulate that due to the inaccessibility of the Solomonic Temple to the general
population, and the subsequent establishment of numerous regional 'high places'
throughout the countryside to worship Yahweh, the Israelites had the freedom to
experience with foreign cults whilst contemplating the role of Yahwism in their own
culture (Herr 1997:128). It is notable though that whichever god was worshipped,
whether it was Yahweh, Ba'al or any other deity, it played a significant role in the ancient
Israelite culture.
Over time the Israelites developed their own ideas on death and the afterlife (King &
Stager 2001:363, 375-380). They believed in a continued relationship between the living
and the deceased and a deceased's well-being in the afterlife depended upon the
descendants' preservation of the patrimonial estate. But also, the Israelites believed that
the afterlife was dismal as the deceased were not able to praise God anymore. They
accepted as true that spirits of the dead were exiled from God and gathered in Sheol, a
dark placed located beneath the ocean floor. The Israelites believed that Yahweh
disapproved of any contact with the deceased and as a result, the practice of necromancy
was condemned in Israel.
The Israelites engaged in two types of burial, namely primary or secondary burial
(Borowski 2003:83-84; King & Stager 2001:364-365). In primary burial the deceased
was placed permanently in the burial site outside city walls and not moved after
decomposition. In secondary burial the corpse was placed in a tomb only temporarily
until the flesh decomposed, after which the skeletal remains were transferred to a pit to
make place for the newly deceased. Excavations in Jerusalem have unearthed more than
100 cave tombs and chambers and show that the burials defined the perimeter of the city
during the Monarchy.
The Israelites did not engage in embalming and cremating their dead but rather buried
them dead in pits, caves, cists and bench tombs together with their ornaments and
jewellery. This took place before sundown as an unburied corpse was seen as a disgrace
and a sign of divine judgment (King & Stager 2001:363). Clay coffin burials were
common in ancient Israel, especially during the influence of the Assyrian empire whilst
13
sarcophagi and ossuaries only became common during the Hellenistic and Roman periods
(King & Stager 2001:368-370).
Fig.7. Cemetery at Tell el-Farah
http://www.bu.edu/anep/IrFarahT500.gif
Fig.8. Anthropoid coffin, found at Dhiban, Iron II
http://www.bu.edu/anep/059.gif
Death was followed by weeping and a period of mourning which lasted seven days (King
& Stager 2001:372-373). The period of mourning was a sign of respect to the deceased.
During this period individuals fasted and wore sackcloth whilst they also transformed
their physical appearance by rolling in ashes, sitting on the ground and tearing their hair.
14
5.3. Housing: where did the Israelites live?
What did the ancient Israelites' homes look like? Artifacts and remains show that since
Iron Age I the two-storied four-room house, averaging 30-70m2, was the standard abode
for all Israelites (Borowski 2003:16; Faust 2000:19; Herr 1997:126). This type of house
was adequate for a nuclear family consisting of a mother, father and three unmarried
children and was widespread throughout Iron Age II. It must be noted that slaves,
foreigners or Israelites who have been declared insolvent and sold as slaves, often formed
part of the household and were the master's property (Isserlin 1998_101-102). However,
slaves could own property and no evidence exists for any slave revolts in ancient Israel.
The ground floor had a central space which was used for domestic and communication
purposes while surrounding side rooms provided space to protect animals overnight
(Borowski 2003:16-21). The second floor, furnished with basic furniture such as beds,
tables, seats and lamps, contained the private rooms:
"Let us make a small second story flat and put there for him a bed, a table, a chair and a
lamp stand, so that he can stay there whenever he comes to us"
(King & Stager 2001:34; see also 2 Kings 4:10).
Fig.9. Example of a four-room house used from ca.1700-ca.587 BCE
http://www.bible-archaeology.info/4room.jpg
15
Fig.10. Excavation of a pillared house, Iron Age I-II
http://www.bu.edu/anep/029.gif
The four-room house had a flat roof which served two purposes. It provided sleeping
space during warm nights and allowed the people to collect rainwater during the winter
months which was then collected in cisterns. Furthermore, a hole in the ceiling provided
fresh air together with natural daylight inside the house whilst ceramic lamps were used
to provide light during the night (King & Stager 2001:30). Windows contained no glass,
were small and few in order to protect the inhabitants from the dust from the streets and
the glare of the sun (King & Stager 201:30; Neufeld 1971:46; see also Hosea 13:3). The
popularity of this type of house is ascribed to its capability to expand and elaborate,
allowing an owner who becomes wealthy to expand on his simple house by adding rooms
along the axis of the central courtyard (Beebe 1968:50-52).
How did the Israelites construct their basic four-room homes? The abundance of stones in
the mountains allowed the highlands Israelites to construct their homes with hewn stones
while individuals who resided in the lowlands constructed their homes with mud-bricks
(Borowski 2003:16-21; Herr 1997:126). These materials were placed on foundations
which were set in trenches. This was followed by plastering the walls, a process
frequently repeated due to corrosion brought about by frequent rainstorms. Roofs, created
by crossbeams, were then covered with branches or reeds.
16
Fig.11. A reconstructed Israelite house, 10th–7th century BCE
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0a/A_reconstructed_israelite_house%2C_Monar
chy_period3.jpg/220px-A_reconstructed_israelite_house%2C_Monarchy_period3.jpg
The four-room house changed little during the Iron Age and dwellings of the non-royal
population remained essentially indistinguishable (Beebe 1968:50-56). This was evident
in excavations at Tell Qasile, Tirzah and Megiddo. This may have indicated not only
positive economic conditions which may have encouraged home holders to employ
contractors to construct their houses, but it could have also been the result of a powerful
and centralized influence on Israel or an indication of social equality. But dwellings at
Tirzah show that high walls between homes might have indicated differentiation in
economic status whilst dwellings at Tell es-Sa'idiyeh show an increased practice of
individualism in decoration toward the end of Iron Age II(Beebe 1968:56). This was
evident in the mud-brick wall of one house decorated with small stones while there was a
lack thereof at the dwelling next door.
5.4. Food and Diet: what did the Israelites eat?
What did the ancient Israelites eat? Borowski (2003:71-74), Herr (1997:119) and King
and Stager (2001:64-68, 91, 103-106) indicate that although the Bible lacks a detailed
description of how the ancient Israelites prepared their food, it has rich information on
the type of food the Israelites consumed. Overall, the Israelites relied on their
17
environment for subsistence and had an interesting, varied and healthy diet. Milk readily
available from cows and goats as well as bread, which could be easily produced over a
straw fire, appeared to form the staple diet. Cereals such as barley and wheat; legumes for
example chickpeas, lentils and broad beans and spices for instance cumin, coriander and
dill also formed part of the diet. Israelites also ate a variety of fruit, nuts and seeds, such
as pomegranates, mulberries, dates, carobs and dates; pistachios, almonds and walnuts
together with onions, garlic, leafy plants, carrots and cucumbers. Furthermore a variety of
condiments such as saffron, cloves, cinnamon, and honey together with mint, salt and
vinegar formed part of each meal.
Meat such as veal, lamb, beef and deer also formed part of the diet (Borowski 2003:65;
King & Stager 2001:65-68). It was obtained domestically rather than hunted and was
perceived as a treat set aside for social events. Borowski (2003:68-71; also see Leviticus
1:20-23) and King and Stager (2001:101-103) note that fried or grilled grasshoppers
together with salt and freshwater fish were also consumed together with wine and beer,
however drunkenness was not tolerated and was made out to be immoral. As a summary,
the Bible provides a comprehensive overview of an Israelite meal when Abraham fed the
messengers cakes, milk and cheese together with a prepared calf, wine, water and baked
goods (Borowski 2003:65; also see Genesis 18:6-8).
The Israelites had three meals a day and the time of consumption was determined by the
nature of the daily activities (Borowski 2003:73-74). For instance, in order to prepare for
a full day working in the fields, breakfast was consumed before sunrise. Breakfast and
lunch were light meals and consisted of fruit and bread and olives. Dinner, eaten at
sunset, was the social event of the day and comprised a stew, porridge and vegetables.
Furthermore, due to the lack of storage facilities and the Mediterranean climate, the
ancient Israelites salted, smoked or dried their meat and fish to preserve their food.
18
5.5. Health and illness in ancient Israel
Literature indicates that physical cleanliness was not a top priority in ancient Israel and
that sanitation was far below contemporary standards (Borowski 2003:69-74; 78-79; Herr
1997:120; King & Stager 2001:69-71). Lack of sanitation was evident in all aspects of
ancient Israelite life. For instance, the Israelites only washed their hands and feet on a
regular basis, rather than the whole body. Also, a lack of toilets resulted in the dumping
of human excrement in nature whilst waste was dumped in the streets. Additionally, due
to the non-existence of house drains fresh water was inadequate and water that was
collected in cisterns was often polluted. Moreover, due to the nature of the woven
garments the frequent washing of clothes was reserved for the elite.
Neufeld (1971:53-54) notes that the Israelites had very primitive table manners as not
only was food eaten with the hands, the sharing of plates and bowls was the norm and
mouths were wiped on sleeves. As a result, garments became coated with food which
inevitably led to the growth of micro-organisms. Neufeld furthermore states that utensils
were cleaned with sand or plant and oil juices. Overall, these unhygienic conditions
resulted in the ancient Israelites being subjected to numerous illnesses, such as blindness,
skin diseases, tuberculosis as well as leprosy, septic infections and mental illness.
Fig.12. Stairs leading down to the water system at Gibeon, Tell es-Sa'idiyeh
(http://www.bu.edu/anep/034.gif)
19
The ancient Israelites engaged in a variety of activities to counter their lack of sanitation
and the prevalence of illnesses (Borowski 2003:74-77; King & Stager 2001:69-72;
Neufeld 1971:45, 52,59). Firstly, insecticides such as smoking frankincense were used to
get rid of a variety of seasonal pests. Secondly, people spent as much time outdoors in
order to inhale fresh air rather than inhale the infected air associated with crowds in the
cities which encouraged the development of chest infections. Subterranean drains were
built in order to keep city centres dry while a variety of water systems, such as those
excavated at Gibeon, Gezer and Beer-Sheba, were built during the United Monarchy to
provide the inhabitants with fresh water. Public baths and heating systems were also
constructed, as found at En-Gedi, however it is unsure if it was meant for hygienic or
social purposes.
On a personal level, olive oil was smeared on an individual's head to prevent the spread
of head lice while the same substance was wiped all over the body in order to prevent the
skin from cracking in the hot and dry climate. Also poor as well as elite Israelites used
strong perfume made from indigenous and imported plants such as saffron and laudanum
in order to hide strong body odour.
Fig.13. First century BCE Judean hair comb used to get rid of the eggs of head lice, found at Qumran
(Zias 1991:41)
20
The ancient Israelites firmly believed that health and illness were strongly related to their
relationship with their One God (King & Stager 2001:75-77). Yahweh was seen as the
sole healer of illnesses to the extent that the profession of physicians was frowned upon.
The Israelites dealt with illness in two ways: at first prayer was used to ask for
forgiveness and healing whilst the sick person underwent ritual purification; also the
person was placed in quarantine (Borowski 2003:74-77). For instance, Psalm 30 shows
the association of prayer with healing:
"Yahweh my God
I cried to your for help,
And you have healed me"
(King & Stager 2001:82-84)
Circumcision, performed with a flint stone when an infant was eight days old, was also
perceived as a spiritual bond between Yahweh and Israel (King & Stager 2001:42-44; see
also Gen 17:10-14 and De Circumcisione 11:210). As a result all male Israelites had to be
circumsised and only those who were exposed to this ritual were allowed to take part in
Passover (King & Stager 2001:42-44; see also Exodus 12:48-49). It must however be
noted that Philo, a Jewish writer, was the first author to link circumcision with hygiene
rather than religion (King & Stager 2001:43-44; see also De Circumcisione 11:210).
How did the ancient Israelites treat diseases? Literature shows that they made use of
various medical techniques (King & Stager 2001:79-80). One technique was trephination,
evident in the pieces of skull with rectangular holes in it which was found in a grave at
Lachish (Iron Age II). The pieces clearly show that the individual(s) endured this
procedure to either relieve cranial infection, to rid the body of evil spirits or to remove
imbedded objects. The Israelites also relied on ingredients from their environment to heal
illnesses, such as myrrh, wild gourds and frankincense.
21
5.6. Dress and Adornment
What did the ancient Israelites wear? Neufeld (1971:53) and Isserlin (1998:97-100) note
that clothing during ancient times in Israel was based on the traditions from the Late
Bronze Age and had a variety of purposes (King & Stager 2001:259-266; 272-273).
Garments were basic and due to the warm climate and practical nature of their work were
loose fitting. Moreover, variation in type of clothing was based on gender, level of wealth
as well as climate.
Male and female clothing was very similar (King & Stager 2001:272). Both genders wore
medium or long-sleeved fleece tunics which were worn over their shoulders and held
together with a belt. A shroud decorated with tasseled ends was then thrown over the
tunic. However, due to a ban on cross-dressing, slight differentiations between male and
female garments occurred (King & Stager 2001:272; see also Deuteronomy 22:5). For
instance, females' outfits were longer compared to those of males. Women wrapped their
heads with shawls as well as covered their faces with veils on special occasions. Men on
the other hand decorated their tunics with tassels and also wore turbans. The difference
between men and women was also evident in their hairstyles (King & Stager 2001:282-
283). Women either wore their hair parted with a short fringe or curly, whilst men wore
their hair in a coil or in locks. Men also cut their beards short and had a clean upper lip
(King & Stager 2001:259-260).
Overall, numerous textile finds such as spindle coils and other weaving objects like
shuttle cocks and needles show that simple objects were used to produce clothing (Herr
1997:119). Excavations have also shown that textiles were used for a variety of
purposes, namely for curtains, basketry, wall rugs, tents as well as sackcloth, wall
decorations and shrouds (King & Stager 2001:146). The Israelites also engaged in the
dyeing, embroidery and tanning of fabrics (King & Stager 2001:158-159). For example,
Exodus 26:1 provides a detailed description of the embroidery of the Tabernacle curtains:
"Moreover you shall make the Tabernacle with ten curtains of fine twisted linen,
and blue-purple, red-purple, and scarlet yarns;
you shall make them with cherubim skillfully worked into them"
(King & Stager 2001:159).
22
Variation in clothing was seen in the different social classes in ancient Israel (King &
Stager 2001:272). For instance, in order to
differentiate themselves from the poor,
wealthier individuals preferred to wear
expensive and imported purple-dyed textiles
which were decorated with fringes and borders.
Priests and royalty also wore sophisticated
turbans and crowns together with linen
undergarments. Additionally, the poor often
went barefoot whilst more affluent Israelites
wore sandals. Furthermore, the Black Obelisk of
Shalmeneser III emphasizes regional differences
in clothing as wealthy men from northern Israel
are depicted wearing turned-up shoes together
with nightcaps which is in contrast with the
leather sandals worn by moderate Israelites.
Fig.14. Black Obelisk of Shalmeneser III
(http://www.bible-history.com/black-obelisk/Black-
obelisk-1.jpg )
Clothing also had to adapt to the physical and social activities that individuals were
involved in, such as military and social activities (King & Stager 2001:259-266; 272-
273). Soldiers for instance were dressed in short loin cloths which were joined with a
belt. Also, the Lachish Reliefs of Sennacherib show how Judahite leaders in general wore
sleeveless garments adorned with trimmings, yet when they visited the Assyrian king
their normal clothing was replaced by decorated headscarves and short-sleeved tunics
which were tied together with a belt.
Clothing had not only symbolic meaning but also religious significance (Isserlin 1998:97-
10; King & Stager 2001:258-259). For instance, an Israelite could settle his debt by
handing over his shoes to another individual, indicating a transfer of property whilst .the
removal of shoes when entering a holy place was seen as a sign of respect. Samuel 3:31
clearly indicates the symbolic meaning when an individual removes his clothes during the
23
mourning process: "Tear your clothes, and put on sackcloth, and mourn over Abner"
(King & Stager 2001:259). It is apparent that clothing played a significant part in the
ancient Israelite culture to the extent that the textile industry was only second to the
agriculture industry in importance (King & Stager 2001:259-260).
Fig.15. Lachish reliefs
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/53/Lachish_Relief,_British_Museum_1.jpg
Fig.16. Incised bone pendants and beads on a necklace – Iron Age II (Gibeon Tomb 3)
http://www.bu.edu/anep/GibeonT3Beads.gif
Fig.17. Jewelery from the North Cemetary Beth Shan (http://www.bu.edu/anep/087.gif)
24
The ancient Israelites went to great lengths to beautify themselves and adorn their
garments (Isserlin 1998:99-100; King & Stager 2001:267-281). For instance, jewelery
played a significant part in the Israelite culture as not only did it indicate wealth, it was
used as a currency and also served religious purposes. Jewelery was made of bronze and
silver and included anklets, nose rings, bracelets as well as necklaces and earrings.
Jewelry often also contained semi-precious stones such as steatite, carnelian and red
limestone. Women used malachite and galena mineral powders to produce eye cosmetics,
though women who wore eye paint were perceived to be of ill repute.
5.7. Arts and creativity
Joffe (2002:442-444) together with King and Stager (2001:129) note that at the beginning
of Iron Age I the Israelites showed a lack of ingenuity and originality when it came to
their material culture. This could have been result of the Second Commandment
prohibiting the Israelites from idolisation rather than art per se. This strong influence of
religion on art is seen in the most famous artistic artifact from the tenth century BCE,
namely the Taanach cult stand (Herr 1997:128). The register at the bottom shows the
fertility deity Asherah whilst the second row shows an empty space which could have
been reserved for Yahweh. The third register depicts Asherah's lions whilst the upper
register shows a solar disc which might have indicated Yahweh worship. Art for the
ancient Israelites rather had a utilitarian use which was evident in the variety of clay
objects they produced (Herr 1997:119). This included cooking pots, bread ovens, seals as
well as weights and lamps. Cooking pots for instance had flat bottoms which not only
allowed it to be placed on hot coals for a lengthy period of time it also allowed heat to be
distributed evenly.
25
Fig.18. Taanach cult stand
http://cnes.cla.umn.edu/courses/archaeology/Taanach/images/TaanachCultStand.jpg
Art in ancient Israel however undergone a metamorphosis during the ninth and eight
centuries BCE due to the economical boom, urbanisation and exposure to foreign ideas
and material culture (Joffe 2002:444; 449). Finkelstein (1999:40-41) notes the
emergence of large-scale centralized workshops during this period, together with the
standardization of ceramic form in pottery as well as the shipment of art to foreign places,
all indicative of a full-blown state government. During this period traditional traits in
pottery gave way to a new 'royal culture' which showed a strong Phoenician influence.
This was evident in potters replacing the hand burnish technique in favour of wheel
burnishing ceramics which were seen in the red burnished 'Solomonic pottery' in the
Southern Levant, the ceramic 'hippo storage jars' which were popular in the north of
Israel as well as the 'Samaria Ware'.
26
Fig.19. Black-on-red Juglet (Beth Shan)
http://www.bu.edu/anep/BethShanBoRed.gif
Fig.20. Gold and Ivory fragment Inlay Floral Pattern, Lotus, Lily – 3.8x4cm, Iron Age II
http://www.antiquities.org.il/t/images/300/1227324.jpg
Fig.21. Fragment inlay decorated in relief, palm pattern, Iron II, found at Samaria
http://www.antiquities.org.il/t/images/300/1227375.jpg
Foreign ideas, especially Assyrian, also filtered into the architecture of royal cities. For
instance the temples, public buildings and palaces at Hazor, Tell Jemmh, Yokneam and
Beth-Shean underwent major improvements in appearance and showed a large courtyard
surrounded by various rooms on all sides (King & Stager 2001:201-202, 208). In fact,
pillared buildings, with three long parallel rooms, built on a grand scale became the most
common form of public architecture during the Monarchy. But the grand scale of
architecture was especially obvious in Solomon's building activities. For instance, in his
palace complex was a Hall of Pillars, the Hall of the Throne and a house for the pharaoh's
daughter. The House of the Forest measured 25x50m and had cedar pillars resembling a
forest.
Decoration of buildings was also affected by foreign influence. This was seen in the
Samaria ivories in which the depiction of natural scenes, women as well as the Egyptian
goddesses Nephthys and Isis were common (Herr 1997:141). Also, the palmette, the
scarab beetle and the rosette were common decorative elements and are presumed to have
been symbols of the United Monarchy (Herr 1997:161).
27
In contrast to art during the pre-monarchical period music, vocal as well as instrumental,
formed a core part of every day existence for ancient Israelites (King & Stager
2001:285). Not only did music form part of family and domestic life it was also included
in social and court life, at festivals and was used to celebrate war victories.
Fig.22. Layout of the Samaria royal complex during time of the Monarchy
http://www.bu.edu/anep/Samaria.gif
The importance of music however increased during the United Monarchy, as seen in the
presence of music in the coronation of the king, and it was during this era and especially
the Persian Period that the occupation of musicians emerged and became sought after
professions (Borowski 2003:87-91; King & Stager 2001:285-289):
28
"Your solemn processions are seen, O God,
the processions of my God, my King, into the sanctuary – the singers in front, the
musicians last, between them the girls playing the tambourines"
(King & Stager 2001:285-289; see also Psalm 68:25-26)
The Israelites enjoyed playing a variety of musical instruments which were made of
elements readily available, such as silver, gold, bronze and often also clay (King &
Stager 2001:291-292, 294-298). Instruments included wind, string and also percussion
instruments such as the tambourine and the lyre (Borowski 2003:93-98): "Jubal was the
ancestor of all those who play the lyre and pipe" (King & Stager 2001:285; see also
Genesis 4:21). Furthermore, dance often accompanied musical performance, but unlike
their Egyptian neighbours, the Israelites did not engage in any dancing when burials and
mourning took place (King & Stager 2001:298-299).
Fig.23. Engraved flute, Iron II, 1.7x10cm. Found at 'En Gedi – Goren, Tell
http://www.antiquities.org.il/t/images/300/1188557.jpg
Fig.24. Ivory zoomorphic stopper in the shape of a male ibex, Iron Age II, 6.9x3.7cm.
http://www.antiquities.org.il/t/images/300/1143035.jpg
Fig.25. Three Astarte figurines from Judah:
http://www.lessing-photo.com/p2/080502/08050251.jpg
Fig.26. Glass head bead worn as a pendant – 5th-6th century BCE.
http://www.hebrewhistory.org/images/factpaper/13-IIc.gif
29
The emergence of creativity during the United Monarchy provided a vast array of visual
arts which included paintings, glass and metal works together with clay figurines,
drawings and wood and stone arts (Borowski 2003:93-98). For instance, Meyers
(1991:17) indicates that small female terracotta figurines, probably used for religious
puroses, have been discovered at almost every site in Iron Age settlements. Although the
figures varied in shape and size, the most ordinary was the Astarte figurine with arms
folded over the breasts.
5.8. Education, literacy and language
There is not much evidence of education among the average Israelites before the eighth
century as it was primarily reserved for the elite (King & Stager 2001:45-46, 310-315).
Rather, the focus was basic subsistence as parents passed down social, religious and
military tradition to their children through poetry, songs, proverbs and stories. For
instance, mothers taught their daughters domestic errands while fathers got their sons
involved in herding. The 10th century Gezer Agricultural Calendar highlights a variety of
agricultural activities over a period of 12 months which is further subdivided according to
seasonal farming activities. Herr (1997:127) however cautions to assume that it indicates
rural literacy.
2 months of ingathering (olives) / two months
of sowing (cereals) / 2 months of late sowing (legumes and vegetables)
a month of hoeing weeds (for hay)
a month of harvesting barley
a month of harvesting (wheat) and measuring (grain)
2 months of grape harvesting
a month of ingathering summer fruit
(Borowski 2003:27-28)
The Samaria Ostraca, the Arad as well as the Lachish Ostraca together with engraved
weights and vases, personal seals and seal impressions indicate that during the eighth
century literacy increased and became widespread (Joffe 2002:449). Writing, whether
30
private or official, was used by the elite as well as any modest individual who was
involved in the economy (Borowski 2003:99; Joffe 2002:449). This not only indicated
literacy among the privileged but also a multifaceted bureaucracy, the incorporation of
religion into worldviews and the involvement of the king in military and economic
matters.
Fig.27. Samaria Ostraca
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/Ostraca_House_samaria.jpg
As more Israelites became literate together with an increased need for economic activity
and diversity, a cursive script started replacing the formal script which not only allowed
for quicker writing it was also available for anyone (Herr 1997:140, 159). This was used
for instance for writing receipts and list of names and objects in inventories. Its usage
became so widespread that it symbolized the democratization of writing which was
evident in the Hebrew Bible, the most important source of literacy information during the
monarchical period. There was also evidence of schools during this period:
"Draw near to me
You who are uneducated
And lodge in the house of instruction"
(King & Stager 2001:315-317; see also Ecclesiastes 51:23).
Herr (1997:159-160) shows that toward the sixth century BCE the Paleo-Hebrew script
derived from Phoenician prototypes was replaced by Aramaic. Today's Hebrew script is
a derivative of Aramaic writing as practiced by Jews during the Hellenistic and Roman
periods.
31
Scribal activity also increased during the Monarchy to the extent that scribes eventually
became appointed professions within the bureaucracy (Borowski 2003:99, 104-105).
Scribes were employed to correspond on bullae, to keep records of important events as
well as to do monumental inscriptions. This was evident in The Annals of the Kings of
Judah, the Lachish Letters, the 'lmlk' stamped jar handles of King Hezekiah's 701 BCE
revolt as well as the Samaria Ostraca,
Fig.28. Bullae inscribed in Hebrew, Iron II, 13x17mm – City of David
http://www.antiquities.org.il/t/images/300/1144947.jpg
Common writing tools included for instance chisel for stone surfaces and a stylus to write
on metal (King & Stager 2001:304-307). Writing surfaces were mostly perishables and
included potsherds, wood, papyrus as well as leather, stone and metal, however clay was
the most common writing surface (Borowski 2003:99; King & Stager 2001:304-307).
For example, two silver plaques (ca.650 BCE) engraved with the name 'Yahweh' were
discovered in the Ketef Hinnom cemetery in Jerusalem, the first incident of 'Yahweh' on
an object excavated in Jerusalem. The famous Dead Sea Scrolls on the other hand were
written on tanned leather (King & Stager 2001:309-310). Papyrus is not mentioned in the
Bible yet came into usage in the seventh century BCE. Israelites used reeds fashioned as
brushes and dipped into red ink, derived from iron oxide and gum, as well as black ink,
charcoal mixed with gum or oil, to write on papyrus and leather.
32
Until the end of the seventh century Hebrew was the most common language spoken by a
variety of nomadic tribes (Schwartz 1995:11-12). However during the monarchical time
language use in Israel varied (Borowski 2003:6-10). Isaiah 36:11 and 2 Kings 18:26
demonstrate that northern and southern Israelites spoke with different dialects, elites in
Jerusalem spoke Aramaic whilst individuals from other areas spoke a language similar to
Canaanite, Moabite and Ammonite. In ca.300 – ca.70 BCE Hebrew was no longer spoken
as was wholly replaced by Aramaic (Schwartz 1995:12-12). It was only after ca.70 BCE
that Hebrew revived again.
5.9. Trade and Commerce: how did the ancient Israelites survive?
The economy in ancient Israel at the beginning of the first millennium BCE was very
basic (King & Stager 2001:189-192). The Israelites were agro-pastoralists with the
majority of any economic activity occurring within the house. Some bartering occurred
within villages and due competition between power families some degree of
specialization occurred, such as the production of wine. The village economy was based
on seasonal work centering on tilling the land and herding. (Borowski 2003:25-30).
Workers aimed to maximize the hours of daylight with production starting at sunrise until
sunset. The need to exploit daylight as much as possible consequently determined the
distance of the fields from the homes. If these were too far away, workers stayed in the
field overnight rather than traveling the long distances. Herding of goats, donkeys,
camels as well as mules and bulls had three benefits, namely providing meat and milk to
the Israelites, supplying wool and skin for garments, as well as dung to enrich the soil.
During seasons, when individuals were not involved in herding and agriculture, a variety
of occupations existed, such as metallurgists, potters, leather workers together with
glassmakers (Borowski 2003:30-31). Over time however the means of farming
production improved and a surplus of agricultural produce and by-products was created.
This enabled the development of the monarchical system, which relied heavily on taxes
that were paid from the surplus (Borowski 2003:26-27)
33
The fundamentals of the Israelite economy changed during the Monarchy. Long distance
trade as well as maritime trade boomed (Borowski 2003:56-57; Herr 1997:127; King &
Stager 2001:179-185). Overland trade moved commodities, such as fruit, vegetables and
livestock, wine and cheese as well as horses, chariots, grain and building supplies from
one village to another. All this was under royal control and resulted in the government
demanding taxes, fees and special permits to engage in trading with Israel. Not only did
families now have to focus on survival, they also had to provide their services and
products to the army, the elite, the priesthood and the king.
This royal initiative only sustained commercial infrastructure, it also supported the
monetary needs of the elite. The king added taxes to imported goods, such as copper,
horses, aromatics, linen and purple-dyed woven garments, which instantaneously turned
these goods into sought after luxury items (King & Stager 2001:194). Maritime trade also
boomed during Solomon's reign as he traded traded with Acco, Dor, Ashkelon, Jaffa and
Gaza (King & Stager 2001:179-185). Solomon was particularly known for his
commercial fleet, named the 'Ships of Tarshish', which formed the foundation for his
seagoing traders.
The bureaucracy continued to exert their control through conquering of neighbouring
territories, royal grants related to the newly taken land as well as tribute tolls and taxes.
Boer (2007:36-37) indicates that these conditions and the differentiation of wealth and
power in the hands of certain individuals resulted in the emergence of social class. The
bureaucracy was disconnected from the production of essential items for survival such as
food and clothing and relied on the poor to produce these essentials which they removed
from them. This could have taken place by persuasion, coercion or by exploitation with
the wealth and power concentrated in the hands of the king. For instance, food was now
not only used for consumption but also for negotiations and to pay taxes.
It was clear that the elites did not support the local communities, as indicated by the lack
of storage facilities in the urban centres (Joffe 2002:442). Rather, Solomon had 'storage
cities' where royal warehouses were located, ultimately highlighting the king's power and
wealth as he controlled international commerce on a large scale (King & Stager 2003:56-
57; see also 1 Kings 9:19). Overall, this shows that during the Monarchy the bureaucracy
34
was rather interested in creating a local presence in order to conduct their political affairs
(Joffe 2002:442).
Ancient Palestine's location made it both strategic and vulnerable as a player in
international trade and commerce (King & Stager 2001:176). For instance, major trade
routes contributed to Israel's economic success. This included the King's Highway, Via
Maris as well as The Way of the Sea, all connecting Israel with foreign regions.
Furthermore, the cities of Gezer, Hazor and Megiddo controlled various routes running to
Egypt (Herr 1997:127). Small paths also ensured that villages remained connected and
fortunately, due to increased monarchical involvement, roads were improved and
maintained (King & Stager 2001:189-192). To further support commerce, open markets
and enclosed stores together with overnight accommodations were readily available to all
merchants. But King and Stager (2001:189-192) note that the Israelites had a patronizing
attitude towards foreign traders, all part of the propaganda they used to strengthen their
commercial position.
During the economic boom in Iron Age II a shift occurred in the occupational setup of the
Israelite society. Occupations became professions as exposure to foreign ideas and
technology resulted in individuals improving their skills. For instance, Borowski
(2003:34-35) points out that 2 Kings 24:14 illustrates that in monarchical times metal
smiths were present during the exile to Babylon. As a result, rather than importing skills
such as carpenters and stone masons, the bureaucrats relied on local experts who
eventually started belonging to associations whilst upholding their knowledge within the
clubs and their families. Lastly, the traditional tasks related to survival were not replaced
by positions connected with the bureaucracy, such as weaving, masonry and pottery
(Borowski 2003:55-59).
During the Monarchy constant interaction took place between cities and villages. City
folk used middlemen to purchase commodities produced by rural people (King & Stager
2001:189-192). This exchange was done through bartering, haggling or the trade of
precious metals whilst the unit of exchange was determined by weight. The marketplace,
which contained shops such as butcheries and wine shops, was situated at the city gate
with a large piazza where merchants could trade their products.
35
Another consequence of the economic explosion, and possibly the largest, was increased
urbanization (Borowski 2003:42-44). The biggest factor that accompanied this
occurrence was the collection of all agricultural surpluses as taxes and resulted in the
modification of the outer appearance of ancient Israel (Borowski 2003:52-54). On the
whole, foreign merchants and ambassadors were imported which resulted in increased
prosperity for the few elites and the resulting need for sophisticated items. This resulted
in the emergence of cosmopolitan cities with ethnicities representing the Amorites,
Hittites, Phoenicians in addition to Egyptians, Transjordanians and Arameans.
Urbanisation also had negative consequences. For instance, cities became so densely
populated and so costly to live in, that the majority of Israelites were forced to move back
to the countryside (Borowski 2003:52-54). But the land belonged to the bureaucracy and
the Israelites had no more control over their land and resulted in the replacement of
agricultural occupations with positions in manufacturing, banking and commerce.
Additionally, the economy was also very unstable and due to the world of bad
investments, foreclosures, interest and mortgages the rich could become poor and the
poor could become rich overnight. This resulted in an overall insecure and restless
mindset among the majority of the population. King and Stager (2001:199) however
mention that although interest was widely practiced, it was only applicable to foreigners.
Boer (2007:36) and Borowski (2003:43-44) note that during these bureaucratic times the
temple-city became the core of Israelite society, functioning very similar to a modern
contemporary society. Boer uses the analogy of the temple-city as the axle and the village
communities as the various points at the end of the spokes to demonstrate the relationship
between the two entities. Although each facet of this economic hub exists on its own, the
village could not exist without the temple and the palace. Also, cities had different
functions and constantly changed due to economic and political pressures whilst their size
and plan maintained their position in the administrative hierarchy.
5.10. Warfare: an ordinary aspect of ancient Israelite existence
Prior to the Monarchy combat formed part of every day existence in ancient Israel
(Borowski 2003:59-61; King & Stager 2001:223). Warfare was so common that not only
36
were periods of peace seen as out of the ordinary, Israelites often thought that their
homeland had a wartime curse on it:
"You build a house,
but you will not live in it.
You will plant a vineyard,
but you will not harvest its fruits"
(Smoak 2008:19; see also Deuteronomy 28:30)
In pre-monarchical times the clan had the core military function whilst towns furnished
soldiers in times of need (Master 2001:124). However during the Monarchy the focus
shifted from clans wanting to ensure survival of the settlement to the king, the head of the
army, who gained importance whilst working towards keeping and strengthening his
bureaucratic power (Borowski 2003:59-61; King & Stager 2001:223-231; Paton 1897:30-
31; see also Amos 5:3). It was of crucial importance for the kings to maintain Israel's
critical position on the international trade routes as well as manage the constant friction
experienced by other imperial powers (Borowski 2003:59-61; King & Stager 2001:223-
231). As a result, alliances and treaties were the order of the day (Paton 1897:30-31).
Israel became a strong international military power and the country experienced peace for
a period of 40 years. During Saul's reign various strategic changes took place in the army
as well as in the type of weaponry used, yet a defensive position was maintained. It was
however during David's rule that the stance changed to offensive as David wanted to
maintain his territory. The success of David's army relied on three factors: first, he used
foreign mercenaries in his special forces which he combined with his foot soldiers;
second, David made use of a census to determine the composition of his armed forces, a
strategy normally used for military recruitment, slavery and levying taxes; third, he
ensured that military training formed part of every adult male's daily activities (Borowski
2003:35-41; King & Stager 2001:239-244). At this stage the soldiers were better armed
and drilled and proved to be much stronger than the tribal militia and over time replaced
it entirely. Overall, the rules of the new kingdom, robbed of the traditional kinship ties,
enforced its new authority structure on the former elites of the tribes and on the general
public (Master 2001:126).
37
However, following the demise of the United Monarchy and the loss of Israel's position
as an international power, war became paramount again when the country split into Judah
and Israel (Borowski 2003:59-61). Not only did the Israelites engage in fighting with
foreign enemies, Judah also recurrently engaged in war with Israel. The reason for
Israel's almost constant warfare at this stage was fuelled by various factors, namely her
economic conditions as well as her strategic placement on the Middle East's trade routes;
the environment and climate as well as, and most importantly, religion (Borowski
2003:59-61; Good 1985:386; King & Stager 2001: 223-231; 239-242). The Lachish
ostraca contain spectacular descriptions of the frenzied last-minute activities of Judeans
during the Babylonian invasion which ultimately saw the destruction of Jerusalem (Herr
1997:159).
What did the Israelites do to protect themselves? At first the Israelites built fortifications
around their cities whilst the villages kept the boundary walls (King & Stager 2001:231-
233). Although fortifications were not prominent in Iron Age I, it became a common
feature of Israelite cities, trade routes and along the Israelite borders in Iron Age II.
Casemate walls appeared in ca. 950 BCE and lasted until the eight century BCE, however
following the Assyrian attacks casemate walls were replaced by more solid walls, as seen
at Dan, Gezer and Hazor. In addition, the walls were strengthened with inner as well as
outer gates of wood and plated metal whilst tunnels inside the walls provided escape if a
city was sieged (Borowski 2003:46-49; King & Stager 2001:231-233). Gates on the other
hand served a trifold purpose: it contained watchtowers but also provided a public
assembly place as well as an area for individuals to conduct official and commercial
transactions:
"Hate evil and love good
And establish justice at the gate"
(King & Stager 2001:234-236; see also Amos 5:15)
38
Fig.29. Map of Tell en-Nasbeh clearly showing the outside walls (http://www.bu.edu/anep/Nasbeh.gif )
Fig.30. Casemate wall – Iron Age II (http://www.bu.edu/anep/025.gif)
39
Furthermore, many cities had an acropolis where the king's palace was located and
provided the last resort for hiding in case the city walls were mounted. Also, the water
systems did not only provide the inhabitants of the city with water, it also acted as a
defense system (Borowski 2003:49). Overall it appears that most of the strategies that the
Israelites implemented served more than one function.
What did the Israelites use to engage in war? The Bible, as indicated in 2 Chronicles
26:14, indicates that soldiers wore protected clothing such as coats, tunics, leggings, and
boots as well as helmets and shields (King & Stager 2001:223-231). Swords, worn in a
sheath, were also common together with axes, spears, javelins, bows and arrows together
with iron or bronze blades.
Fig.31. Solomonic city gate at Hazor city
http://www.biblelandpictures.com/gallery/gallery%2FPLACES%2F3048-5-Hazor,-City-Gate.jpg Fig.32. Solomonic city gate at Gezer
http://bleon1.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/gezer_dsc01403.jpg
Due to the frequency and intensity of military activity it had a significant influence on the
Israelite society. As a result and due to the high risk of death during warfare, laws were
formulated to exclude individuals from participation (Borowski 2003:35-41). For
instance, Deuteronomy 20:8 describes how someone who has build a house without
bestowing it on someone else had to return from war before the house would be dedicated
to someone else. This act was seen when Gideon returned before his battle with the
Midianites (Judges 7:3).
40
Borowski (2003:35-41, 59-61) indicates that the military also engaged in a variety of
tactics to ensure victory. Treaties, such as the pax Solomonica, and alliances through
inter-marriages were foremost part of the Israelite line of attack. Spies were also used
together with augury, the interpretation of the flight of birds, and extispicy, the analysis
of animal organs, to predict future outcomes of combat. Furthermore, in order to swiftly
assemble forces, the army sent out messages in the form of human or animal body parts.
Lastly and most importantly, religion played a significant role in determining Israel's
ideology on warfare (Good 1985:388). Yahweh was consulted in the decision to go to
war as well as regarding the outcome of a confrontational engagement. Borowski
(2003:35-41) notes that the Israelites referred to their wars as Yahweh's wars and anyone
who was their enemy was also Yahweh's enemy. Harper (1896:485) fittingly summarises
that "…the living God was Israel's God and Israel's helper". Good (1985:398) also
clearly indicates how these events are captured in the Bible:
"[Yahweh] cast Pharoah's charioty and host into the sea,
His finest troops were sunk into the Reed Sea.
The deep covered them,
They went down in the depths like a stone"
(Exodus 15:4-5)
"You [Yahweh] blew with your wind,
The Sea covered them.
They sank like lead
In abundant waters"
(Exodus 15:10)
The environment also played a significant role in the Israelite strategy. For instance, the
Israelites knew that they had to fight during spring in order to engage in combat in a dry
terrain whilst relying on their knowledge of heavy rain in order to trick their opponents
(King & Stager 2001:239-242).
Exodus 14:20-21 shows that the victorious outcome of war was celebrated by all in dance
and song (Borowski 2003:35-41). Celebration was further shown in the counting of the
bodies of the dead enemies; the collection of booty; burning of the enemy's city and
41
ultimately punishing the foreign leaders severely. The role of religion in warfare is
further evident in the belief among ancient Israelites that defeat was seen as legal
punishment from YHWH and that it was the direct result of judgment from God (Good
1985:390).
6. Conclusion
The former discussion shows how various factors contributed to the development of the
ancient Israelite culture. A few factors had a strong presence at first; other factors only
emerged over time while some remained constant throughout ancient Israel's history. At
first, the environment was the most important aspect to influence what life would be like
for the ancient Israelites: it determined what the Israelites would eat, where they would
live and how they would protect themselves. However, when God revealed himself to
Moses in ca.1250 BCE prior to the Exodus from Egypt religion infiltrated the Israelites'
outlook on life (Harper 1896:483). The Israelites realised that this One God could take
care of them and shifted their dependence on the environment for survival to their new
god. However, due to increased urbanization associated with international trade and
commerce and the exposure to foreign ideas during the rise of the United Monarchy other
factors came to the fore that also influenced the nature of the ancient Israelite society. For
instance, the people were exposed to doctrines and products unknown to them. This
resulted not only in an increased need among the Israelites to educate themselves but also
increased innovation and a need for more material wealth. This all happened against the
backdrop of the elite exploiting the poor.
Overall, these changes in sociopolitical factors resulted in Israel evolving from a simple
traditional culture of monotheistic agro-pastoralists, arranged around families and clans,
into a polytheistic society which focused on individual needs rather than those of the
family (Isserlin 198:287). But amongst all these societal changes the Israelites believed
in their One God, and despite periods where they experienced with other cults, their
religion remained constant in determining their outlook on life and was the one factor that
remained present in their culture until the Roman Period (Boer 2007:44).
42
Bibliography
Beebe, H.K. 1968. Ancient Palestinian dwellings. The Biblical Archaeologist. Vol. 31.
No. 2. pp.37-58. Published by The American Schools of Oriental Research. Accessed
on 22 December 2011 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3120940
Boer, R. 2007. The sacred economy of ancient Israel. Scandinavian Journal of the Old
Testament. Vol. 21. No.1. pp.29-48. Published by Taylor & Francis. Accessed on 22
February 2012 from JSTOR Database
Borowski, O. 2003. Daily life in biblical times. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature
Faust, A. 2000. The rural community in ancient Israel during Iron Age II. Bulletin of the
American Schools of Oriental Research. No. 317. pp.17-39. Published by The
American Schools of Oriental Research. Accessed on 21 December 2011 from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1357482
Finkelstein, I. 1999. State formation in Israel and Judah: A contrast in context, a contrast
in trajectory. Near Eastern Archaeology. Vol. 62, No. 1. pp.35-52. Published by The
American Schools of Oriental Research. Accessed on 21 December 2011 from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3210721
Goff, B.L. 1939. Syncretism in the religion of Israel. Journal of Biblical Literature. Vol.
58, No. 2. pp. 151-161. Published by The Society of Biblical Literature. Accessed on
22 December 2011 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3259858
Good, R.M. 1985. The just war in ancient Israel. Journal of Biblical Literature. Vol. 104,
No. 3. pp.385-400. Published by Dartmouth College. Accessed on 10 November 2011
from Atlas Serials Database
Goodspeed, G.S. 1907. The men who made Israel. The Biblical World. Vol. 30, No. 4.
pp.266-274. Published by The University of Chicago Press. Accessed on 21
December 2011 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3140991
Harper E.T. 1896. Important movements in Israel prior to the Establishment of the
Kingdom. The Biblical World. Vol. 7, No. 6. pp.483-496. Published by The
University of Chicago Press. Accessed on 22 December 2011 from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3140131
43
Herr, L.G. 1997. Archaeological sources for the history of Palestine: The Iron Age II
Period: Emerging Nations. The Biblical Archaeologist. Vol. 60. No. 3. pp.114-
151+154-183. Published by The American Schools of Oriental Research. Accessed
on 10 November 2011 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3210608
Isserlin, B.S.J. 1998. The Israelites. London: Thames & Hudson
Jeyaraj, J.B. 2008. Religion and politics in ancient Israel and Modern India: Issues and
interactions. ERT. Vol. 32, No. 2. pp.136-155. Paper presented on July 31, 2007 at
the Theological Commission Consultation on evangelical political engagement held
at Palmer Seminary, Philadelphia, PA. Accessed on 10 November 2011 from JSTOR
database
Joffe, A.H. 2002. The rise of secondary states in the Iron Age Levant. Journal of the
Economic and Social History of the Orient. Vol. 45, No. 4. pp.425-467. Published by
BRILL. Accessed on 22 December 2011 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3632872
King, P.J. & Stager, L.E. 2001. Life in biblical Israel. Louisville:Westminster.
Master, D.M. 2001. State formation theory and the kingdom of ancient Israel. Journal of
Near Eastern Studies. Vol. 60, No. 2. pp.117-131. Published by the University of
Chicago Press. Accessed on 21 December 2011 from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/545252
Meyers, C.L. 1991. Of drums and damsels: Women's performance in ancient Israel. The
Biblical Archaeologist. Vol. 54. No. 1. pp.16-27. Published by The American Schools
of Oriental Research. Accessed on 21 December 2011 from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3210328
Neufeld, E. 1971. Hygiene conditions in ancient Israel (Iron Age). The Biblical
Archaeologist. Vol. 34, No. 2. pp.41-66. Published by The American Schools of
Oriental Research. Accessed on 21 December 2011 from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3211074
Paton, L.B. 1897. The social, industrial and political life of Israel between 950 B.C. and
621 B.C. The Biblical World. Vol. 10. No. 1. pp.24-32. Published by The University
44
of Chicago Press. Accessed on 25January 2012 from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3140212
Raskovich, A. 1996. You shall have no other gods besides me: A legal-economic analysis
of the rise of Yahweh. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE). Vol.
152, No. 3. pp.449-471. Published by Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG. Accessed on
22 February 2012 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40751885
Redford, D.B. 1973. Studies in relations between Palestine and Egypt during the first
millennium B.C.: II. The twenty-second dynasty. Journal of the American Oriental
Society. Vol. 93, No.1. Published by American Oriental Society. Accessed on 10
November 2011 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/600513
Schloen, J.D. 2002. W.F. Albright and the Origins of Israel. Near Eastern Archaeology.
Vol. 65, No. 1. pp.56-62. Published by The American Schools of Oriental Research.
Accessed on 21 December 2012 from http://www.jstor/org/stable/3210900
Schwartz, S. 1995. Language, power and identity in ancient Palestine. Past & Present.
Vol. 148. pp.3-47. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Past and
Present Society. Accessed on 10 November 2011 from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/651047
Smoak, J.D. 2008. Building houses and planting vineyards: The early inner-biblical
discourse on an ancient Israelite wartime curse. Journal of Biblical Literature. No. 1.
pp.19-35. Published by University of California. Accessed on 10 November 2011
from EBSCOHOST Database
Zias, J. 1991. Current archaeological research in Israel: Death and Disease in ancient
Israel. The Biblical Archaeologist, Vol. 54, no.3. pp.146-159. Published by The
American Schools of Oriental Research. Accessed on 10 November 2011 from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3210263
Top Related