Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
1
Akwasi Boahene
Department of Mathematics, Kwame Nkrumah
University of Science and Technology, Kumasi,
Ghana
Dr. E. Osei-Frimpong
Department of Mathematics, Kwame Nkrumah
University of Science and Technology, Kumasi,
Ghana
Forensic Estimation
Of Time Since Death:
A Comparative Study
Of Polynomial
Regression And
Modified Newton's
Models
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
2
ABSTRACT
Empirical studies have been made into the determination of Time Since Death (TSD).This study attempts to
briefly review most of the methods used to estimate TSD and concentrate on the development of a
Polynomial Regression Model (PRM) and a Modified Newton's Model (MNM) that accurately predicts TSD
and chose the most consistent, efficient and accurate estimator of TSD between the two. Such a model, when
accurately developed, will add to the security services scientific ways of predicting TSD, as well as, help in
civil and criminal cases. The study found out that the PRM best predicts TSD with an R2 of 99.87 %, given
the two secondary data obtained from the Journal of the Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine 2005 volume
27(3):170-176 and the Acta Morphologica 2006, volume 3(3):52-53.The MAPE, MAD and SSE of the two
models were also statistically tested and compared to that of the Actual Time Since Death (ATSD).The MNM
relied on the use of an iterative method, to determine the number of times, time (denoted t in hours) changes
over time for Rectal Temperature (RT) to coincide with the developed model of differential equation .The
calculation embodied several parameters /conditions that affect the cooling rate of dead bodies.
Keywords: Post-mortem Interval, Regression, Temperature plateau, Iterative Method, Algor Mortis,
Entomology, Homicide, Nomogram
1. INTRODUCTION
Several hundreds of thousand Murder/Homicide cases occur throughout Africa and the world. “International
homicide caused the deaths of almost half a million people (437,000) across the world in 2012. More than a
third of those (36%) occurred in the Americas, 31% in Africa and 28% in Asia, while Europe (5%) and
Oceania (0.3%), [20]. The huge number of murder cases gives credence to the need to determine a simple,
efficient, reliable and an easy to use mathematical/statistical model that can estimate the time of death of
murdered victims. The basic natural question asked by all during death is, "When did the victim die?”
Accurate estimation of the Time Since Death has several importance, be it in murder/accidental or natural
death. Proper solution to a civil matter can be arrived at through the use of an accurate estimated time of
death.
[7] puts; "in civil matters, time may be what determines whether or not an insurance policy was in effect or
void". For instance, if a client died hours before maturity of claims, it may not be paid. In other words, it helps
in the determination of an insurance claim. In criminal cases, the time of death may serve as a screening
process to either corroborate or refute or redefine suspects. Above all, it will serve a societal or family need of
satisfying the curiosity of friends and loved ones of the dead, as to TSD of victim.
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
3
Sadly, some security services in Ghana, Africa and parts of the world continue to rely on crude and
unscientific methods to determine/estimate the time of death, especially in homicide/murder cases.
Polynomial Regression Model (PRM) and Modified Newton's Models (MNM) are based on temperature
variations of the dead body. It follows the assumption of the Newton's Law of Cooling. They are just a tool
out of the myriad of tools within the reach of the forensic scientist to estimate TSD.
1.1 REVIEW OF SOME METHODS FOR ESTIMATING TIME SINCE DEATH(TSD)
Other measuring rods used to estimate time of death at the disposal of the Forensic Scientist are;
Livor mortis (Post Mortem lividity)
This is the resultant colour of a dead person's body due to pooling of blood and the work of gravity. At death,
the heart stops beating and blood vessels stop moving, halting blood circulation. Blood flows down the
inactive vessels into the lowest part of your body regardless of the body position. It is observed as a dark
purplish hue (shade of colour) onto the skin in which the blood had flown and pooled. Depending on the
extent of time, this colour can / will become permanently fixed on the body. Lividity will be present after 2-8
hours of death. But can be removed easily with pressure on affected area. Hence, if colour disappears, a
person probably died less than eight hours ago. If the colour remains person might have died beyond eight
hours.
Environmental factors such as temperature, accessories and clothing on dead body can affect livor
mortis.Environmental factors such as temperature, accessories and clothing on dead body can affect livor
mortis. Extremely cold temperature slows down livor mortis and vice versa. Belts, wrist watches and clothing
can also externally constrict blood passage slowing down livor mortis, [15].
Rigor Mortis
[6], defined Rigor Mortis as the generalized stiffening of the skeletal and smooth muscles of the body
following death. [15], also described it as the extremely stiffening of the body‟s muscles due to the build-up
of calcium in muscle fibre and the inability to remove excess calcium. Rigor mortis begins after two hours of
death, starting from the head and slowly progressing to the feet. After 12 hours the dead body would be at its
most rigor state. After 36 – 48 hours, the body would resume the soft dead body status. Process of rigor
mortis depends on temperature, body weight and body temperature and sun exposure. It is faster in hotter
bodies and slower in cooler bodies, [15].
The colour of the eye
Cloudiness of the cornea will appear within a few hours to 24 hours, depending on the degree of closure of
the eyelids, environmental temperature, humidity, and air movement. It is not recommended that you attempt
to use cloudiness of the cornea for determination of post-mortem intervals due to the multitude of factors,
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
4
which affect it, [6]. The transparency of the Cornea is very variable. [11], claimed that, the variability of the
Cornea is less than other methods of estimating PMI. His analysis of 238 autopsies' cornea revealed that,
transparency. They concluded that changes of the Cornea occurs more in warm and moist weather than in
warm and dry weather and cold and moist respectively and least in cold and dry weather. That changes of the
Cornea occurs more in warm and moist weather than in warm and dry weather and cold and moist
respectively and least in cold and dry weather.
Forensic Entomology
Forensic Entomology is the study of insects found at the crime scene. A pathologist is able to establish a more
accurate time scale depending on which insect are found on the body and what they are at in their life cycle,
[5]. Forensic entomology works in death scene investigation because insects are defined by certain
characteristics and follows a predictable pattern of development, [21]. Arthropods (invertebrate animals with
joint limbs) are most important in forensic entomology because they eat dead vertebrate bodies, including
man. One of the first groups of insects that arrive on a dead vertebrate is usually the blowflies (Dipteria,
calliphoridae). The female blowflies oviposit (lay eggs) on dead body within few hours.
(www.cienciaforense.com/pages/entomology/overview.htm). Blowflies and insects go through four
developmental stages called complete metamorphosis. A careful or correct calculation of these stages of
development of insects as well as other creatures present at a crime scene can lead to the estimation of the
time since death.
The following table of approximation of the time of death, using insects present and stages of dead body is
developed from the following article; [22] and [3].
Approximate time of death Appearance of body/stage Insects present
Few minutes – 3 days Fresh stage Just like sleeping. Last
until body bloats
Blowflies and flesh flies arrive
minutes after death. Begins to lay
eggs/deposit maggot. Maggots
begin to feed on body tissues. Ants
begin arriving.
4 – 7 days Bloated stage Body becomes visibly
inflated, especially abdomen. Colour
change and odour of putrefaction is
noticeable.
Blowflies, houseflies, flesh fly,
maggot, beetles, ants and other
creatures feed on maggot.
8 – 18 days Decay active stage Carcass deflates.
Has wet appearance and a strong
odour of putrefaction.
Ants, cockroaches, beetles and
flies.
19 – 30 days Advanced decay/post decay stage.
Most flesh remove from carcass.
Strong odour of decomposition being
to fade
Adult skin beetle and mite arrives
at carcass. Larval stages are absent.
Instar calliphorid being to leave
carcass
31 days and over Dry decay
Bones, hair and portions of skin stench
is no longer powerful
Centipedes, isopods, snails and
cockroaches.
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
5
The above table gives a general decomposition model of a dead body. However, factors such as temperature
(slow decomposition at cold periods and vice versa), drug present in body at death, clothing and access to
dead body can affect rate of decomposition.
[8], postulated that insects are frequently the first organisms to arrive at a dead body. That, their activities
begin a biological clock that will allow for an estimation of the post mortem interval (PMI).Five -5- stages of
decomposition (fresh, bloated, decay post-decay and skeletal) are suggested as reference points in the
decomposition process. Factors that may delay invasion of the remains by arthropods or alter developmental
patterns, such as presence of drug and toxins, wrapping of body and climate were discussed by [8]. [9], saw
entomology as the application of knowledge of insects during investigation of crimes or other legal matters.
His study of Insect evidence or presence revealed that insects of the form of blow flies in their different stages
of development are found on fresh and decaying corpses. Beetles were found on skeletonised bodies.
Henssge Nomogram Method
The Nomogram method is based on a formula which follows the sigmoid shape of the cooling curve.The
formula contains two exponential constant parts. The first represent the Post Mortem Plateau and the second
constant shows the exponential drop of temperature after the Plateau according to the Newton‟s law of
cooling, described by [16]. A widely used Nomogram for a forensic time of death determination is the one
published by Henssge in 1981. He presented a simplified method to determine the Newton cooling
coefficient, by finding out statistical figures of the deviation between calculated and real death times for
cooling under standardized conditions (e.g. ambient temperature of below 230C and above 23
0C). His
Nomogram is in two folds; one for ambient temperature above 230C and one for ambient temperature below
230 C.
Based on conventional calculations such as those of; De Saram and Marshall as well as backed by a great
volume of experimental data, Henssge has produced a method which can be carried out either by a simple
computer program or a Nomogram. The results are given within different ranges of error, with a 95 %
probability of the true time of death falling within this ranges. The ranges vary from 2.8 hours each side at a
best estimate to 7 hours at worst, [18].
To read off the time of death, connect the rectal and ambient temperature on the Nomogram with a straight
line, so that it crosses the diagonal line on the Nomogram. A second straight line is then drawn from the
centre of the circle at the bottom left of the diagram to intersect the diagonal line and the initial line drawn on
the Nomogram. The second line crosses the semi-circles of the body weight and that of the outermost semi-
circle. The estimated time of death is read off .The outermost intersection gives the margin of error at 95%.
For instance, given a body temperature of 28.80
C, ambient temperature of 210
C and body weight of 83 kg,
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
6
with an ATSD of 13 hours. Then, the estimated time of death becomes; 16 ± 2.8 hours. The death occurred
between 13.2 and 18.6 hours, before the measurement with a 95 % reliability level.
Henssge Nomogram for ambient temperature up to
Source: Pellini, 2011
Algor Mortis
The Algor Mortis is the bases of all the temperature based models for the estimation of the TSD. Extensive
research has shown that, the human body temperature is averagely above that of the ambient (atmospheric)
temperature. This temperature reduces in the body after death. This reduction in the body is called Algor
mortis. Unlike forensic entomology, Algor Mortis is most effective during the first 24 hours of death. Its
effectiveness fades as actual time since death increases. Post Mortem interval / cooling does not begin
immediately after death, it stays constant for a period before reducing. This initial lag in temperature, termed
as Temperature Plateau was defined by [17], as the period after death where, the body does not cool at all and
may even rise.
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
7
Source: HenBgea and Madea, 2004
2. METHODOLOGY
An address of the Polynomial regression models (PRM) and the Modified Newton‟s Model (MNM) will be
made. Both models are examples of temperature based models used in the estimation of TSD.
2.1 POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION MODEL
2.1.1 REGRESSION
It is a statistical technique to determine the linear relationship between two or more variables. They are
primarily used for prediction and causal inference. In its simplest (bivariate) form, regression shows the
relationship between one independent Variable (X) and a dependent Variable (Y) as in the formula below;
(1)
Where,
the intercept parameter
the amount of variation not predicted by the slope and intercept) [2].
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
8
2.1.2 A POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION MODEL (PRM)
Polynomial Regression Model can be said to be a form of a regression that fits a non-linear relationship
between independent observed variables say, and a resultant dependent variables , where, ' ' is
expressed as a Vandermonde matrix of degree. PRM are considered as both Linear and multiple
regression models.
2.1.3 ASSUMPTIONS UNDER THE POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION MODEL
Just as a linear regression assumes that, the relationship you are fitting a straight line to, is linear,
polynomial regression assumes that you are fitting the appropriate kind of curve to your data. It assumes
that data points are independent.
The variable is normally distributed and homoscedastic for each value of . [14].
The behaviour of a dependent variable y can be explained by a linear, or curvilinear, additive
relationship between the dependent variable and a set of „K‟ independent variables (X j, j = 1... K).
The relationship between the dependent variable y and any independent variable x j are independent of
each other and
The error term (ε) are independent, normally distributed with mean zero and a constant variance
/standard deviation. In other words, ε ~ (0, σ 2).
2.1.4 BUILDING THE POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION MODEL
Order of the Model
The order (K) of polynomial models should be kept as low as possible. [4], advised that, higher-order
polynomials (K > 2) should be avoided unless they can be justified for reasons outside the data. It is
extensively known that the cooling/heating of the rectal temperature of a dead body follows a sigmoid (S)
Shape, hence, cubic. Supported by [10]; "The curve of the cooling (of a dead body) is sigmoid in pattern".
Polynomial Regression Model in Matrix
Let X be an n X k matrix with observations on K independent variables for a total of n observations. As
our model contains a constant term, the first columns in the X matrix will contain only ones.
Let Y be an n X 1} vector of observations on the dependent variable.
Let ε be an n X 1 vector of disturbances or errors.
Let β be a k + 1 vector of unknown population parameters that we want to estimate.
Then the realization of this relationship in a general regression models can be written as a system of equations
as follows;
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
9
=
+
The general regression model can be written as , in matrix. Therefore, the expected value
of , gives; , [1]. Using the Least Square Method in Matrix, we find the estimators , that
minimizes the sum of squares residuals
, with a vector of residual of form; .
Hence,
The Sum of Squares Residual can be expressed as;
=
Hence,
( ) (2)
Expanding
= y y – X y – y X + X X
= y y -2 X y + X X (3)
Using the identity that the transpose of a scalar is a scalar;
= ( ) = X y , and minimizing with respect to
= -2 X y + 2 X X = 0 (4)
Hence, X X = X y
Multiply through the equation by (X X)-1
with the assumption that, the inverse of the matrix exists, gives;
= (X X)-1
X y
The modelled Polynomial Regression (PRM) becomes;
= (5)
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
10
Replacing the R.H.S of (5) by the hat matrix (H), gives; . Where H, is idempotent (H2
= H X H = H)
and symmetric (H = H T).
2.1.5 APPLICATION OF DATA TO THE PRM
If we replace the X matrix by our observed rectal temperatures to form a Vandermonde matrix of degree 3,
and solving the expression for , [(X'X)-1
X'Y], we will get the following estimates of .
X =
Y =
X X =
X Y =
, = =
=
Hence, the 3rd
degree Polynomial Regression Model from our data becomes;
= + -0.001259 (6)
2.1.6 VALIDITY AND PREDICTABILITY OF THE MODEL
The following R summary and Anova outputs for the 3rd
degree Polynomial Regression Model aids in
analysing and checking the validity and predictability of the Model.
R Output Summary
Coefficients Estimates( ) Standard
Error
t-Value p-Value
Intercept 963.959713 124.3 7.738 0.0000289
X -30.894845 4.46 -6.915 0.0000695
X2
0.338438 0.05323 6.358 0.000132
X3
-0.001259 0.0002103 -5.986 0.000206
R2
0.9987
R2 Adj. 0.9982
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
11
Residual
Standard
Error
0.3267
Source: author
Analysis of Variance Table
Degree of
Freedom(DF)
Sum of
square
Mean square F-value P-value
3 727.04 242.346 2270.7 2.846 e-13
Residuals 9 0.96 0.107
Source: author
The R2 squared and Adjusted R
2 squared (i.e. the percentage of variance in the dependent variable that
can be explained by the predictors) are 99.87% and 99.82 % respectively. This shows that the
Polynomial Regression Model is an accurate fit or predictor of the Time since Death (TSD).
The Standard Error of the estimate (cubic estimate) is very small, 0.0002103. Hence, the errors of the
residual tends to be closer to the mean. This implies that, the model predicts well the dependent
variable.
Testing for a cubic relationship between the TSD and RT, we test the H0:β3 = 0 against H1: β3 ≠ 0.
Significant level (α = 0.05), P-value of the coefficient of the X3, is 0.000206. As the p-value (0.0002103)
< α (0.05), we reject the H0 in favour of H1 and conclude that, there is a cubic relationship between TSD
and RT at 95% level of significance.
The Mean Square Error (MSE) for our estimate is (SSE/degree of freedom) = 0.107. Hence, size of the
errors in the regression is very small. In other words it shows that the regression fits the data very well.
Again, the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), calculated as ;
MAPE=
(7)
Gives 2.7225 ≈ 2.72%. Since it lies less than 10% it shows that the PRM is an Excellent-Accurate forecaster
of the TSD.
The test statistics for calculating the Confidence Interval (I) and Predictive interval (PI) for the Regression
Models are;
(8)
And
(9)
Respectively.
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
12
Where, n is the total number of observation (13), is the predicted value (estimated TSD), SE, is the standard
deviation of the error term (0.3267), is the mean of the RT (81.99) and XA is the actual time TSD we
wanted estimate (10) .
Given a rectal temperature of . (Check Appendix)
= + -0.001259 =9.76 hours
which corresponds with the actual time of death of case 5.
The t-value associated with (1-α) confidence, = = 2.228
A 95% C.I and P.I are as follows;
n = 13, s = 0.2374, and = 12.2542
C.I at 95% level of significance for = 9.76 ± 2.228*0.3267 * 1.03786729761
=9.76±0.2019569828
Hence we are 95% confident that the, the prediction of will fall within
(9.55804, 9.96196).
Also, the P.I at 95% level of significance for = 9.76 ± 2.228 x 0.3267 x 1.03786729761
= 9.76 ± 0.7554507364
= (9.00455, 10.51545).
We are 95% confident that the estimate for a RT of 85.330 F, would be contained in the interval
(9.00455, 10.51545).
Summary of Validity of the PRM
Calc.
Stats
Value Implication on the PRM
R2
99.87 Accurate predictor of TSD.
SE 0.0002103 PRM is a good predictor of the independent variable.
MSE 0.107 Small Error in the Regression. Fits data very well.
MAPE 2.72 Excellent and Accurate Forecaster of TSD.
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
13
2.2 NEWTON’S MODEL
Mathematically the Newton‟s law of cooling is defined as follows;
a (10)
Where;
T, is the temperature of a cooling object, in our case a dead body.
t, is the time in hours since the first measurement of the body.
Ta, is the ambient temperature.
, is the constant of proportionality between the ambient and body temperature.
Solving the Above equation gives the following model;
T (t) = Ta +T0 - Ta (11)
Which is the well Known Newton's Model. It assumes a constant Ambient Temperature and does not consider
a lot of parameters in its computation. This makes them largely inaccurate in estimating TSD. [13], came to
the realization that dead bodies do not correspond perfectly to the Newton's Law of Cooling, especially,
during the initial stages of death. [13], after graphing the general shape of the curve that describes the
temperature of a cooling body added a “correcting factor” to the Newton‟s Law to represent the plateau. The
said correction factor is exponential in form and decays with time. The expression for this function is (Ce-pt
)
the differential equation for the deceased body then becomes;
=-K (T-Ta) + c (12)
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
14
Where K and P are cooling rate constants for the cooling factor and Plateau (indicated by the clothed states),
all other parameter denote the same meaning as in the Newton‟s model above.
Writing the above equation in standard form as;
+ P (t) y = Q (t) (13)
, where P (t) = K
Then the Integrating Factor (IF) becomes IF = =
Multiplying through equation 12, by the IF gives;
(14)
a
(15)
But, simplifying the L.H.S, using the following product rule of differentiation,
U(x)
+V(x)
=
(u(x) v(x)) (16)
, gives;
a
(17)
Integrating both sides w.r.t. t becomes;
(18)
(19)
Multiply equation 19, by,
gives;
T = Ta
+
T (t) = Ta +
(20)
if t = 0 , T(t)=0=T0 , then; T0 = Ta +
+ A .
Hence, A = T0 -Ta -
(21)
From 12, if t = 0;
(22)
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
15
Put equations 21 and 22 into equation 20 and simplify further
T (t) = Ta+
+ (T0 -Ta) (1-
)
T (t) = Ta+ (T0 -Ta) ((
+ (1-
) ) (23)
T (t) = Ta+ (T0 -Ta) (
) + ) (24)
Which is the final Modified Newton's Model (MNM) for estimating time since death.
From [12],
The rate constant of the Newton‟s model (K) is given as; K = Size Factor (SF) * 0.0006125- 0.05375
Where, SF = 0.8 *
While the rate constant for the plateau (P) is given as 0.3 for clothed body and 0.4 for nude bodies.
An Iterative method that iterates the number of times time (denoted t in hours) changes over time for Rectal
Temperature (RT), (T(t)) to coincide with the developed model of differential equation 22, embodying several
parameters /conditions that affect the cooling of dead body is used to estimate the TSD.
3. RESULTS
Two secondary data obtained from the Journal of the Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine 2005 volume
27(3):170-176 and the Acta Morphologica 2006, volume 3(3):52-53 (Macedonia Association of Anatomists
and Morphologists), were used for this paper. The first data presents Rectal Temperature of 418 adult subjects
aged between 18 and 60 years who died through accident at the Tropical region of Chandigarh (India), [19],
was used to develop the PRM. While the second data which presented analysis of 50 dead bodies with KTSD
were used to validate the predictability of the two models.
The following table presents the results obtained using the two models, PRM and the MNM‟s and the Actual
or Known Time Since Death (KTSD).
Estimated Results of TSD Using the PRM and MNM
CASE SEX Ta oC/
0F RT
OC/
OF Weight
(kg)
CLOTHED ATSD PRME MNME
1 M 17/34 34.9/94.82 65 + 4 4.04 2.76
2 F 22/62.6 34.4/93.92 65 + 4 4.62 4.48
3 M 19.3/66.74 35.1/95.18 78 + 4 3.80 4.28
4 F 22.5/72.5 34.7/94.46 75 - 4 4.28 4.85
5 M 22.4/72.32 35.9/96.62 65 - 4 2.76 2.96
6 M 24/75.2 33/91.4 75 - 5 6.16 7.93
7 M 21/69.8 36.5/97.7 80 - 5 1.91 2.06
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
16
8 M 22.4/72.32 32.8/91.04 80 - 6 6.36 7.7
9 F 22/62.6 32.2/89.96 58 - 6 6.98 5.82
10 M 21/69.8 34/93.2 75 - 6 5.08 5.41
11 M 16.5/61.7 33.2/91.76 60 + 6 5.95 5.47
12 M 20/68 33/91.4 78 - 6 6.16 6.47
13 M 24.5/76.10 34.1/93.39 70 + 6 4.97 6.86
14 M 21/69.8 32/89.6 57 - 7 7.19 7.15
15 M 16/60.8 30.6/87.08 80 + 7 8.64 8.79
16 M 21.3/70.34 32.5/90.5 80 + 7 6.93 8.42
17 M 24/75.2 33/91.4 78 + 7 6,16 8.85
18 M 24/75.2 33.9/93.02 82 + 7 5.19 7.44
19 M 24/75.2 33.8/92.84 84 + 7 5.30 7.69
20 M 22.5/72.5 33/91.4 70 + 7 6.16 7.76
21 M 30/86 33.4/95.72 75 + 7 3.42 7.17
22 M 21/69.8 32/89.6 72 - 8 7.19 7.86
23 M 21.2/70.16 32.4/90.32 55 - 8 6.78 6.66
24 M 21/69.8 32.6/90.68 85 - 8 6.57 7.60
25 M 24/75.2 32/89.6 50 - 9 7.19 8.16
26 M 19/66.2 31.6/88.88 78 + 10 7.60 8.61
27 M 23/73.4 30.9/87.62 80 + 10 8.32 12.14
28 M 15.7/60.26 27.2/80.96 75 + 12 12.92 12.38
29 M 24/75.2 29.6/85.28 80 + 13 9.75 16.23
30 M 21/69.8 .8/83.84 83 - 13 10.71 13.64
31 M 16.5/61.7 28.1/82.58 80 - 13 11.62 11.14
32 M 18/64.4 28.4/83.2 75 - 14 11.27 11.23
33 F 20.6/69.08 27.2/80.96 54 - 14 11.92 13.42
34 F 20/68 27.5/81.5 45 - 14 12.47 11.42
35 M 23/73.4 27/80.6 75 - 15 13.23 21.55
36 M 24.4/75.92 25.9/78.62 76 + 15 15.11 33.06
37 M 23.6/74.48 24.1/75.38 75 - 15 18.90 51.95
38 M 20/68 24.5/76.1 80 - 15 17.97 23.35
39 M 21/69.8 24/75.2 73 + 16 19.15 27.07
40 M 23/73.4 23.5/74.3 95 + 17 20.41 58.26
41 M 19/66.2 23/73.4 80 + 19 21.77 25.91
42 M 22/71.6 23.3/73.94 95 + 19 20.94 43.85
43 M 22/71.6 23.3/74.3 85 + 19 21.77 45.04
44 M 17/62.6 23/73.4 75 + 20 22.63 21.53
45 M 17/62.6 22.7/72.86 70 + 20 23.22 21.30
46 M 17/62.6 22.5/72.5 76 + 20 23.22 22.19
47 F 20.6/69.08 22/71.6 65 - 21 24.6 34.56
48 M 21/69.8 21.6/70.88 73 + 22 26.11 49.23
49 M 20/68 21.3/70.34 80 + 24 27.15 41.49
50 M 21/69.8 21.8/71.24 60 - 24 25.44 39.65
Source: Acta Morphologica 2006, volume 3(3):52-53
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
17
Comparing the means of the PRME and MNME and that of the KTSD at a 95% significant level
revealed that; Preliminary analysis of the result(s) churned out from the two models reveals that, there
are no difference between the estimates of PRM and KTSD. However, there existed a difference
between estimates of MNM and KTSD except without the outliers.
The parametric statistic of the population, (KTSD) variance (σ2).
(24)
Hence, The Standard Deviation is =5.97 and μ = 11.38. Since σ2 is known and N > 30 we use the Z test
statistic of
(25)
And the Z critical is Z0.025 = ± 1.96
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495002468
1012141618202224262830323436384042444648505254565860
Number of Cases
Tim
e S
ince D
eath
(H
ours
)
Plots of Actual/Known TSD , PRME and MNME
ATSDPRMEMNME
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 520
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
NUMBER OF CASES
TIM
E S
INC
E D
EA
TH
BAR CHART FOR THE ATSD,PRME AND MNM
ATSDPRMEMNME
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
18
Hypothesis for Model 1 (PRME)
H0: μ = 11.58
H1: μ ≠ 11.58
= 0.2369 (26)
For Model 2 (MNME)
H0: μ = 16.62
H1: μ ≠ 16.62
= 6.2064 (27)
Since Z1 calculated for model 1 (0.2369) falls within the range of Z critical, we fail to reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that, there is no difference between the mean of the ATSD and the estimates using
the PRM. On the other hand, the Z calculated for model 2, (6.2064) falls beyond the range of the Z critical,
hence, we reject the null hypothesis and state that there is enough evidence to conclude that, there are
differences between the mean of the KTSD and the estimated TSD using the MNM.
The two models were further tested against the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) and the Sum of
Squares Error (SSE) to determine which one is consistence and accurate in estimating TSD.
MAD and SSE for Model 1
(28)
(29)
MAD and SSE for Model 2
(30)
(31)
Since the MAD and SSE for the PRM, (1.7498) and (221.9887) respectively, were smaller than that of model
2 (MNME), we conclude that the PRM predicts TSD with accuracy and consistency than the MNM.
Both models predicted exactly or with minimal errors the TSD during the first 15 hours. However, cases
with temperature difference of the Rectal Temperature (RT) and the Ambient Temperature (AT) less
than 2.60 F gave unacceptable estimates of the MNM, with the worst error of estimated TSD using the
MNM, occurring at both cases 37 and 40. ((RT-AT)=0.9) in each case.
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
19
The PRME on the other hand stayed within range, predicting TSD throughout the fifty (50) cases with
very little discrepancies.
3.1 SUMMARY OF COMPARATIVE VALIDATION OF PRME AND MNME
Calc.
Stats
PRME MNME Implication On Estimated Results.
MAD 1.7498 5.9728 PRM is an accurate predictor of TSD than MNM
SSE 221.9887 6531.009 PRM is a consistent predictor of TSD than MNM
4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The study achieved all of its aims including determining the best model for estimating TSD between the PRM
and the MNM. PRM estimated TSD better with little or no discrepancies. The MNM was also good in
determining the TSD for the first 15 hours after death (Where (RT-AT) >2.6 0 F)
Further investigations revealed that, the MNM will produce estimates of TSD having larger / unacceptable
errors, if the difference between the Rectal Temperature (RT) and Ambient Temperature (AT) is between (0.1
and 5 0 F).
Hence, based on the analysis of the results, I conclude that the Polynomial Regression Model (PRM) is the
best estimator of Time Since Death in all circumstances of death relative the Modified Newton's Model.
5. REFERENCES
[1] Nathaniel Beck. Ols in matrix form. http://weber.ucsd.edu/nbeck, 2001.
[2] Dan Campbell and Sherlock Campbell. Introduction to regression and data analysis. Stat Lab Workshop, 2008.
[3] Lisa Carloye and Stephen Bambara. Crime solving insects. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, 2006.
[4] Ray-Bing Chen. Polynomial regression models. Institute of Statistics National University of Kaohsiung, 2014.
[5] Jack Claridge. Estimating the time of death. Explore Forensic, 2015.
[6] William A. Cox. Early postmortem changes and time of death. 2009.
[7] Vernon J. Geberth. Estimating the time of death in practical homicide investigations. Law and Order Magazine, 55, 2006.
[8] M.L. Goff. Estimation of postmortem interval using arthropod development and successional patterns. Forensic Sci Rev 5, pages
81{94, 1993.
[9] Parmod Kumar Goyal. An entomological study to determine the time since death in cases of decomposed bodies. J Indian Acad
Forensic Med., 34, 2012. 20
[10] R.N. Kamakar. Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 3rd Edition. Bimal Kumar Dhur of Academic Publishers, 2010.
[11] Binay Kumar, Vinita Kumari, Tulsi Mahto, Ashok Sharma, and Aman Kumar. Determination of time elapsed since death from
the status of transparency of cornea in Ranchi in di_erent weathers. J Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine. 34, 2012.
[12] N. Lynnerup. A cumputer program for the estimation of time of death. Journal of Forensic Science, JFSCA, 38(4):816 to 820,
1993.
[13] T.K Marshall and F.E Hoare. Estimating the time of death: the rectal cooling after death and its mathematical expression. Journal
of Forensic Sciences, 7, 1962.
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
20
[14] J.M. McDonald. Handbook of Biological statistics. Sparky House, 2014.
[15] T. Norman. 4-ways-to-determine-time-of-death-in- a -dead-person, January 2012.
[16] V. Poposka, A. Gutevska, A. Stankov G. Pavlovski, Z. Jakovski, and B. Janeska. Estimation of time since death by using
algorithm in early postmortem period. Global Journal of Medical research Interdisciplinary, 13, 2013.
[17] Harry Rainy. On the cooling of dead bodies as indicating the length of time since death. Glasgow Medical Journal, 1868.
[18] P. Saukko and B. Knight. Knight's forensic pathology. Arnold Publishers, 3rd Ed, 2004.
[19] Dr. Dalbir Singh, Dr. Suresh Kumar Sharma, Dr. Indar Jit Dewan, Dr. Y.S. Bansal, Dr. Vishal, and Mr. Avadh Naresh Pandeya.
Polynomial regression model to estimate time since death in adults from rectal temperature in Chandigarh zone of northwest India.
Journal of the Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 27:170{175, 2005}.
[20] UNODC. UNODC Global Study on Homicide 2013. United Nations Publications, 2014.
[21] Dick Warrington. Crime scene bugs. Forensic Magazine, 2010.
[22] Wikepedia. Decomposition. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, page 627010363, 2014.
APPENDIX
Mat lab code for Iteration
data = [rectal , ambient, weight, clothed state ]
extimated_tn = zeros (size (data,1)) ;
For i =1: size (data, 1)
t = 0.001;
T0 = 98.96;
T = data (i, 1);
Ta = data (i, 2);
W = data (i, 3);
threshold = abs (T * 0.0001);
BSA = 0.1173 * (W^ 0.6466);
SF = 0.8 * BSA*10000 / W;
k = SF * 0.0006125 - 0.05375;
p = data (i, 4);
loop = 1;
while loop
tv = Ta + (To - Ta)* (exp(-k * t) + (k/(k-p))*((exp(-p*t))-(exp(- k*t))));
ans = abs( T - tv);
if ans <= threshold
estimated_t(i) = t;
loop = 0;
else
t = t + 0.001;
end
end
end
estimated_t'
Researchjournali’s Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2 | No. 6 July | 2015 ISSN 2349-5375
21
Data for PRM
TSD(Hrs.) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
RT (0 F) 98.04 95.07 91.60 88.33 85.33 82.60 80.16 77.96 76.03 74.39 73.05 72.05 71.31
Source: JIAFM 2005 volume 27(3):170-176
Acknowledgement
The author wants to express sincerest thanks to John Torgbui Galley, Daniel Molley and Matilda Owusu Boakye for their support and
contributions in this paper.
Top Related