AVR-ISSN: 2249-72 56
AVR-Vol. No. 2, July- September 2014
EFFECT OF TEACHING THROUGH CONCEPT MAPPING ON
ACHIEVEMENT IN SOCIAL STUDIES
Dr. Manoj Kumar
Assistant Professor, Saraswati College of Education,
Madlauda, Panipat
This study revealed the impact of teaching through Concept Mapping in Social Studies’
components. The sample selected for the study consists of 40 students from class-VIII, of Govt.
Senior Secondary School, Uplana, Karnal. The experimental method is selected in which the
one-Group Pre-test Post-test design was used. The students were taught using concept mapping teaching
technique. The results show that students taught through concept mapping have higher achievement. In
nutshell, concept mapping enhances meaningful and active learning and it also provides wider scope to
curriculum developer in social studies and other sciences.
Key Words: Concept Mapping, Socio-Economic Status, Achievement, Social Studies.
Preamble:
The student population as there is exceptionally heterogeneous and there are broad
differences in the intelligence, abilities, aptitudes, interests and goals of students, as well as,
the diversities, in the needs of society are recognized. Some students seek the simple; others
the complex; some pursue the concrete; others the abstract; some are interested in the known;
others in unknown. It is the rare student indeed, who can master the spectrum, even though the
conditions for teaching and learning may be ideal.
Historical Background of Concept Mapping:
In the 1960s, Joseph D. Novak (1993) at Cornell University began to study the concept
mapping technique. His work was based on the theories of David Ausubel (1968), who stressed
the importance of prior knowledge in being able to learn abou t new concepts. This program
was based on the learning psychology of David Ausubel 1963, 1968, Ausubel et al., 1978. The
technique of concept mapping was developed by Joseph D. Novak and his research team
at Cornell University in the 1970s as a means of representing the emerging science knowledge
AVR-ISSN: 2249-72 57
AVR-Vol. No. 2, July- September 2014
of students. Concept maps were developed to enhance meaningful learning in the sciences.
Concept maps have their origin in the learning movement called constructivism. In particular,
constructivists hold that learners actively construct knowledge. Thus was born a new tool not
only for use in research, but also for many other uses.
Concept maps are graphical tools for organizing and representing knowledge. They
include concepts, usually enclosed in circles or boxes of some type, and relationships between
concepts indicated by a connecting line linking two concepts. Words on the line referred to as
linking words or linking phrases, specify the relationship between the two concepts. Concept
maybe defined it is perceived regularity in events or objects, or records of events or objects,
designated by a label. The label for most concepts is a word, although sometimes we use
symbols and in the universe, either naturally occurring or constructed. Propositions contain
two or more concepts connected using linking words or phrases.
Cross-links: The links between concepts in different segments or domains of
knowledge on the map that helps to illustrate how these domains are related to one another.
Cross-links are important in order to show that the learner understands the relationships
between the sub-domains in the map. It is important to help students reorganize that all
concepts are in some way related to one another.
What is CONCEPT MAPPING?
A concept map can be considered as somewhat similar to a spider chart, an organization
chart or a flow diagram. The most useful form of a concept map for teaching and learning is
one arranged in a hierarchical organization which the more general and more inclusive
concepts at the top of the map and the more concrete and specific ones at the bottom.
There are three basic features used in creating concept maps: (1) a list of concepts, (2)
lines that represent the relational links between these concepts, and (3) labels for these linking
relationships (Lawson 1994). The procedure of concept mapping starts with the generation of
a list of concepts through brainstorming. Connecting lines are drawn between these concepts to
indicate the flow of inter-relationships. Labels along the connecting lines further explain the
inter-relationships between concepts which may result in a knowledge structure. These maps
can be refined by many rethinking and redrawing processes as more knowledge is accumulated
from a search (Novak 1995).
AVR-ISSN: 2249-72 58
AVR-Vol. No. 2, July- September 2014
According to Asan (2007), Concept mapping is a method to visualize the structure of
knowledge. Since the knowledge expressed in the maps is mostly semantic, concept maps are
sometimes called semantic networks.
According to Nelson (2007), Concept Mapping is a nonlinear, graphic representation of
unstable domains, depicting major concept nodes and the interrelationships of those nodes. It is
a learning strategy identified as having a significant impact on retention and retrieval of
information, with continued processing of data over time.
Well prepared concept maps facilitate both teaching and learning processes. These
maps facilitate teaching because teachers can use them to prepare and organ ize lessons by
sequencing topics within lectures. (Novak 1995) Moreover, during the concept mapping
process, teachers will have the opportunity to identify and reduce ambiguities, enabling them
to deliver clearer and more coherent explanations to students. For the students, concept
mapping gives new meaning to learning as they organize the acquired knowledge in their own
way (Willerman, 1991).
A concept map is a way of representing relationships between ideas, images,
or words in the same way that a sentence diagram represents the grammar of a sentence, a road
map represents the locations of highways and towns, and a circuit diagram represents the
workings of an electrical appliance. In a concept map, each word or phrase is connected to
another and linked back to the original idea, word or phrase. Concept maps are a way to
develop logical thinking and study skills by revealing connections and helping students see
how individual ideas form a larger whole.
Why Concept mapping in Social Studies?
Concept mapping technique is learner-centred and activities oriented. It actively engages learners
in meaningful activities provided. It is a technique that aids in schematic organization and representation
of knowledge. The technique provides an active, creative, visual and spatial learning activity in their
hierarchical relationship. It provides the opportunity to organize, analyse, evaluate, summarize and own
ideas.
Concept mapping technique can be used to improve students’ learning achievements and interests
in social studies. It is a better technique that significantly improved students learning achievement
compared to a traditional expository teaching approach. It reflects teaching-learning, student’s knowledge
and facilitates their sense-making and improves their meaningful learning. It improves student’s higher
AVR-ISSN: 2249-72 59
AVR-Vol. No. 2, July- September 2014
order thinking skills in social studies. Student’s achievements better in terms of subject matter content
mastery when taught with psychological strategies using concept mapping. This clearly is a manifestation
of the potential of concept mapping to enhance meaningful learning and improved achievement in social
studies. It is found by many researchers significantly beneficial to promote learning achievements as well
as the learning attitudes of the students. Concept mapping gives also real-time feedback to the students as
well as the teachers.
Therefore, Concept Mapping can more effective than traditional instruction in improving
students’ achievements in Social Studies.
The present investigation is aimed at exploring the effect of teaching through Concept
Mapping on the Academic Achievement in social studies. So the different study related to
concept mapping is reviewed.
One experimental study (Braselton & Decker, 1994) with sixth-grade mathematics
students found concept mapping tools to be advantageous in the improvement of students’
problem-solving skills.
Chularut and DeBacker (2003) investigated the influence of concept mapping on the
achievement, self-regulation and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. The
study was a quasi-experiment which investigated the effectiveness of the concept mapping
used as a second language classroom. The focus was on students’ achievement, self -monitoring
and knowledge acquisition strategies (self-regulation) and self-efficacy in learning from
English language text. Findings shows that four all the variables, concept mapping
(experimental) group recorded significantly greater gains from pre -test to post-test compared to
the control group.
Askin (2007) conducted a study on fifth grade students with twenty-three students at
Ata Elementary School, Trabzon, Turkey to determine the effect of incorporating concept
mapping in science lessons. The students were tested with teacher -constructed pre- and post-
tests containing 20 multiple-choice questions. The pupils in the experimental and control
groups were exposed to the same teaching techniques covering a unit on heat and temperature.
They were given the same pretest after the initial lessons. However, after t he pretest, the
control group was given a traditional oral review of the material and the experimental group
was exposed to the review by the use of Inspiration, which is computer based concept mapping
tool. After these reviews, the students on both groups were given the post-test. Test scores
were analyzed for any statistically significantly difference in the scores on the test. The results
AVR-ISSN: 2249-72 60
AVR-Vol. No. 2, July- September 2014
from present study indicate that concept mapping has a noticeable impact on student
achievement in science classes.
Chiou (2008) examined whether concept mapping can be used to help students to
improve their learning achievement and interests. The participants were 124 students from two
classes enrolled in an advanced accounting course at the School of Management of a un iversity
in Taiwan. The experimental data revealed two important results. First, adopting a concept
mapping strategy can significantly improve students' learning achievement compared to using a
traditional expository teaching method. Second, most of the st udents were satisfied with using
concept mapping in an advanced accounting course. They indicated that concept mapping can
help them to understand, integrate and clarify accounting concepts and also enhance their
interests in learning accounting. They also thought that concept mapping could be usefully
used in other curriculum areas.
Stephanie et al. (2012) examined the use of concept mapping for formative and
summative assessment of northeast Florida middle school students' knowledge of human
geography. The students were participants in an after school, academic, college reach -out
program that provided opportunities to test concept mapping strategies that support spatial
thinking and stimulate interest in human geography. The study documents the use
of concept mapping for assessment of seventh graders' achievement of a specific lesson and for
students' human geography achievement across all implementation
grades. Concept mapping results provided insight into aspects of the curriculum and instruction
where appropriate modifications could better facilitate meaningful learning.
Emergence of Problem:
In the present scenario when we take newspaper and reading about the results of
students in Government schools where the achievement is low day by day. Teachers are
teaching, students are learning but what are the reasons of poor academic achievements? This
question has given researcher a thinking point. Researcher found academic achievement of a
student depends upon different variable for example intelligence, in terest, understanding, study
habits, teaching method, environment etc.
In India and abroad so many new methods and techniques of teaching effectively are
used in public schools for excellent results. On the other hand Indian Government has to
shoulder the responsibility of millions of poor and deprived group students those are unable to
AVR-ISSN: 2249-72 61
AVR-Vol. No. 2, July- September 2014
pay even minimum fee. In this condition to improve the academic result method of teaching
should be effective, new and interesting.
Concept mapping technique of teaching seems less expensive, interesting and easy to
use where other methods are needed much technical knowledge and gazettes. These concept
maps can be utilized to teach the students with the help of blackboard and chalk. Indian
Teacher as a part of their traditional teaching use blackboard sketches as a part of their
teaching to explain different concepts. These blackboard sketches can be modified and molded
in the form of concept maps.
Most of researches had been done on teaching through concept mapping and
achievement has been done at international level. Braselton & Montiel (1980), Alvermann &
Boothby (1983) Alvermann & Boothby (1986), Armbruster et al.(1991), Decker (1994) ,
Griffin et al. (1995), DeWispelaere & Kossack (1996), Novak (2002), Askin, Novak &
Canas (2006) (2007), Chiou (2008). Most of the works been done so far at elementary Schools
on the subject of languages, Mathematics, and Social Sciences.
Objectives of the Study:
The objectives of the present study are as following:
1. To study the significant difference between elementary school students having educated
and uneducated parents on the academic achievement in social studies after teaching
through concept mapping.
2. To study the significant difference among elementary school students belonging to high
and low socio-economic status parents on the achievement of social studies after
teaching through concept mapping.
Hypotheses of the Study:
The following hypotheses are formulated keeping in view of the objectives of the
present study:
1. There exists a significant difference between elementary school students having
educated and uneducated parents on the academic achievement in social studies after
teaching through concept mapping.
AVR-ISSN: 2249-72 62
AVR-Vol. No. 2, July- September 2014
2. There exists a significant difference among elementary school students belonging to
high and low socio-economic status parents on the achievement of social studies after
teaching through concept mapping.
Research Methodology:
The experimental method is selected for the study in which the one-Group Pre-test Post-
test design was used for the study. The sample selected for the study consists of 40 students from
Govt. Senior Secondary schools, Uplana, Karnal from class - VIII. The class has been selected
through the simple randomizations of clusters from Karnal district.
Tools Used:
Keeping in mind these criteria like validity, reliability, practicability etc. the researcher
decided the following tools used to collect data.
1. Socio-Economic Status Scale (SESS-US) by Sunil Kumar Upadhyay and Alka Saxena.
2. Concept Maps on different topics in Social Studies for Class VIII prepared by the investigator.
3. Achievement Test on selected topics of Social Studies developed by the investigator (Pre-test and
Post-test).
Design of Experimental Study:
The Experimental design can be diagrammed as below:
The one-Group Pre-test Post-test Design
Pre-test Treatment Post-test
O1 X O2
Here: O1 and O2 Stands for Pre-test and Post-test respectively.
X for experimental treatment
Treatment:
1st Day and 2
nd Day Introductory session by researcher and supervisor
3rd
Day Lecture was delivered on effective communication Skill
4th Day Pre-test administered
5th Day to
49th
Day
Treatment was given (Teaching through Concept Mapping)
50th Day Post-test administered
51st Day Thanking Party/Tea Party was given to School Teaching Staff and Students
AVR-ISSN: 2249-72 63
AVR-Vol. No. 2, July- September 2014
Data Collection and Scoring:
At the end of the treatment period, the achievement test administered and data was collected. The
scoring key were prepared by the investigator for marking the answer of each tests (Pre-test and Post-
test), one mark was awarded for each correct response and zero mark was awarded for each wrong
response. The achievement test contained only Multiple Choice Questions. The answer keys were
prepared separately.
Statistical Techniques Used:
It has been used descriptive statistics such as Mean and Standard Deviation. The t-ratio was
used to find out the difference between mean scores of pre-test and post-tests.
Table-1: Significance difference between post-tests in Social Studies achievement among
Elementary School Students having educated and uneducated Parents
Edu. Level of Parents Tests N M t-ratio Level of significance
Educated Parents Post-test 20 21 12.60 .01
Uneducated Parents Post-test 20 14.95
It is revealed from the table no. 1 that the t- ratio came out from this table is 12.60,
which is significant at 0.01 level of significance. Further it indicates that teaching through
concept mapping has significant effect on the achievement in social studies.
Thus hypothesis (H1-1) No. states, ‘there exists a significant difference between
elementary school students having educated and uneducated parents on the academic
achievement in social studies after teaching through concept mapping’, is accepted.
Table-2: Significance of difference between post-test in Social Studies achievement among
Elementary School Students belonging to High and Low Socio- Economic Status Parents
Variables Tests N M t-ratio Level of
significance
High SES Parents Post-test 20 19.70 5.52 0.01
Low SES Parents Post-test 20 16.55
It is revealed from the table no. 2 that the t- ratio came out from the groups is 5.52,
which is significant at 0.01 level of significance. This means there is significant difference
between post-tests among elementary school students belonging to high and low socio -
economic status parents on the achievement in social studies after teaching through concept
AVR-ISSN: 2249-72 64
AVR-Vol. No. 2, July- September 2014
mapping.
Thus the formulated hypothesis(H1-2) states, ‘there exists a significant difference
among elementary school students belonging to high and low socio -economic status parents on
the achievement in social studies after teaching through concept mapping, is accepted.
Findings and Conclusions:
The main findings of the study are based on the following: -
1. The result revealed that mean scores of post-tests of elementary school students having
educated parents is higher than those having uneducated parents, it indicates that
teaching through concept mapping has significant effect on the achievement in social
studies.
2. This means there is significant difference between post-tests among elementary school
students belonging to high and low socio-economic status parents on the achievement in
social studies after teaching through concept mapping.
Discussion and Conclusion:
Thus the results of the present study show that there is a significant difference in academic
achievement in social studies among elementary school students taught using concept mapping teaching
technique. Further researches suggest that a well-designed concept map integrated learning system
demonstrates very promising potential for enhancing both the gifted and average students (belonging to
educated and uneducated parents having high and low SES). The system developed in this study could be
a useful resource for elementary school outdoor learning design. It is found that the innovative approach
can be significantly beneficial to promote learning achievements as well as the learning attitudes of
students. This study has yielded similar results in favor of concept mapping (Stephanie et al, 2012, Hung
et al, 2012, Wu Po-Han et al, 2012, BouJaoude, Saouma & Attieh, 2008). Therefore, Concept mapping
meets the assumed assumptions as an effective teaching technique.
Educational Implication:
The present study demands effective educational planning for this area in order
to frame the curriculum, how to teach, how to present the concept in the class using
concept mapping, to deliver the content mat ter in small units to the students so that
they can output in maximum. It can significantly use for faculty working independently or
collaboratively, can redesign course syllabi or an entire curriculum. The hierarchical organization of
AVR-ISSN: 2249-72 65
AVR-Vol. No. 2, July- September 2014
concept mapping suggests more optimal sequencing of instructional material and helps students to make
the instruction more “conceptually transparent”.
References:
Askin Asan, (2007). Concept Mapping in Science Class: A Case Study of fifth grade students.
Educational Technology & Society, Volume 10 (1), pp 186-195.
Askin (2007). Concept Mapping in Science Class: A Case Study of Fifth Grade Students, Educational
Technology & Society, volume 10 no. 1, pp 186-195.
Alenka (2012). Children’s Reasoning about Spatial Relational Similarity: The Effect of Alignment and
Relational Complexity, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, volume 111 no. 3, pp 490-
500.
Best, J. W. & Kahn, J.V. (1992). Research in Education. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.
BouJaoude, Saouma & Attieh, (2008). The Effect of Using Concept Maps as Study Tools
on Achievement in Chemistry, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology
Education, volume 4 no. 3, pp 233-246.
Colley, Binta M.(2012).Teaching Social Studies through the Performing Arts, Educational Forum,
volume 76 no. 1, pp 4-12.
Dictionary of Psychology (2001). Great Clarendon Street. Oxford University Press.
Encyclopedia of Psychology (2000). Great Clarendon Street, Oxford University Press, Inc. 4, P-198.
Fisher, R.A. (1936). Statist ical Methods for Research, Edinburg, Oliver and Boyd.
Gambrell, L. & Bales, R. (1987). Visual Imagery: A Strategy for Enhancing Listening, Reading and
Writing. Australian Journal of Reading. Volume 10 no. 3, pp 147-153.
Garrett , H.E. & R.S. Woodworth (1966).Statist ics in Psychology and Education.
Bombay: Vakeels Feiffer’s and Simons Pvt. Ltd., pp. 233&491.
Koul, Lokesh (1984). Methodology of Educational Research. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt.
Ltd.
Lawson, M.J. (1994). Concept Mapping. In the International Encyclopedia of Education. (2nd
edition,
Volume 2, pp.1026-1031). Tarrytown, New York: Elsevier Science. Pvt. Ltd.
AVR-ISSN: 2249-72 66
AVR-Vol. No. 2, July- September 2014
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or
Appropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners. Science Education,
volume 86 no. 4, pp 548-571.
Novak, J.D., Gowin, R.B., & Johansen, G.T. (1983). The use of Concept Mapping and Knowledge of
Mapping with Junior High School Science Students, Science Education. Volume 67 no. 5, pp
625-45.
Regis, A., Albertazzi, P. G., & Roletto, E., (1998). Concept Maps in Chemistry Education. Journal of
Chemistry Education, volume 73 No. 11, pp 1084 – 1088.
Sharma, R.A. (1985). Fundamental of Educational Research, Meerut: Loyal Book
Depot.
Streeter et al. (2011). Concept Mapping: An Approach for Evaluating a Public Alternative School
Program Children & Schools, volume 33 no. 4, pp 197-214.
Top Related