united states court of appeals - Scanned Retina

Case Caption:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 333 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 -2866

Phone: 202-216-7000 1 Facsimile: 202-2t9-8530

In RE Christopher Earl Strunkk

Petitioner

v.

See attached list

Case Number:

Respondent

PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN AGENCY, BOARD, COMMISSION, OR OFFICER

Notice is hereby given this the 28 day of December 20 that petioner(s) -

n RE Christopher Earl Stnrnk hereby petitions the United States Court of Appeals for the District

of Columbia Circuit for review of the order of the respondent(s) See attached list entered

the 70 d a y o f B c E w m 20)- -

Attorney far Petitioner(s)lPrc, Se Party,

Christopher Earl Strunk

593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281

Telephone: ( 845 ) 901 -6967

USCA Form 12 AUGUST 2009 (Revised)

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892),

U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).

Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875)

U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253, 289 (1814)

Inglis v. Sailors’ Snug Harbor, 28 U.S. 99 (1830) and

Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242, 245 (1830)

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).

Ex parte Reynolds, 20 F.Cas. 582, 5 Dill. 394, No. 11,719 (C.C.W.D.Ark 1879)

United States v. Ward, 42 F.320 (C.C.S.D.Cal. 1890).

Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1872),

Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884),

Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)

Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163 (1964).

New York State Authorities N.Y.S. Election Law § 16-100, N.Y.S. CPLR § 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law § 105 Matter of Smith v Dillon, 267 App. Div. 39, 43 [1943]).

People ex rel. Ryan v Green, 58 NY 295,304-05 [1874];

O’Malley v Macejka, 44 NY2d 530,535 [19781;

Matter of Dupras v County of Clinton, 213 AD2d 952,953 [1995];

Matter of Dykeman v Symonds, 54 AD2d 159, 162 [1976];

Fauci v Lee, 38 Misc. 2d 564,567 [1963], affd. 19 AD2d 777 [1963]).

CHECKLIST FOR EMERGENCY MOTIONS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

333 Constitution Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001-2866

Phone: 202-216-7000 | Facsimile: 202-219-8530

Type of motion: When will it be filed? Date: Time:

Disposition needed by: Date: Time: Why?

NoYesWill the motion be served by hand? If not, why not?

USCA Form 2August 2009 (REVISED)

Date of Lower Court/Agcy Decision: When will copies be provided to the court?

Status of Lower Court/Agency proceedings:

NoYes

NoYesAny hearings scheduled? When?

Status of motion for stay/injunction pending appeal filed with lower court or agency?

Is there a case pending in USCA now? Case No. and Caption:

When will disclosure statements be filed?

If a Notice of Appeal or Petition for Review has not been filed, when will one be?

Brief description of the case: (What is happening & when?):

Name of counsel:

Name of opposing counsel:

Office #:( ) Fax #: ( )Home #:( )

Office #:( ) Fax #: ( )Home #:( )

Comments:

Deputy Clerk:FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY Date:

Time:Who is notified in LD?

Staff Attorney Assigned:

ROUTING

Other:

Clerk Ch. Deputy Clerk LD Office Team Leader Supv/Op Unit Intake

FRAP Rule 21 12-31-2012 Noon

01-06-2013 noon Electoral College Vote count to be take

Served 12-28-12 See Aff attached

11-19-2012 12-31-12

NYS Supreme Court Kings index 21948-2012 requires a stay

01-22-2013

None

In RE Christopher Earl Strun

12-31-2012

Denial of Due process and equal protection in state court 21948-2012 with need of Stay, Trial of facts ofcivil injury to Petitioner, New US Senate Election in New York re 17th Amd. , Injunction against NYElector incompatibility bar Barack Obama from taking oath January 20 2013 Congress to void with 14thChristopher Earl Strunk in esse self represented

See attached list plus The US Solitictor General.

- --

- -845 901-6767

This accompanies the Petition (3 copies with 1 original) for Mandamus Relief with FRAP rule 21 servicehas been effected my two day mail 12-28-12 see affidavits andh Filing Notice given to New York parties

FILING NOTICE: PDF available at : http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/

________________________________________________

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________________________________________________________________

In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS ____________________________________________________________________ Christopher-Earl: Strunk© in esse private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary with injury in re the criminal usurpation of the office of POTUS by Barack Obama’s ineligibility under U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 and related law in Petitioner’s Original Proceeding for writ of mandamus FRAP Rule 21 Order of: A. Stay New York State Justices in the matter of their denial of Petitioner due

process and equal treatment due under the 14th Amt. of the U.S. Constitution and NYS Constitution and related law as to denial of trial of the facts as compelling public interest as to forgery crime aided and abetted by Electors- a Quo Warranto matter;

B. The Governor of New York for a NEW U.S. Senate Election in New York to comply with the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

C. The Clerk and Speaker of the U.S. House with Majority / Minority Leaders and President of the U.S. Senate respond to the incompatibility of any Person serving as an electoral college member while holding an office of trust or profit under the 14th Amt United States and Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 (A2S1C2);

D. Congress to show cause why under the 12th, 20th, 25th amendments and U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5) Barack Hussein Obama II should be eligible to take the oath of office of POTUS January 20, 2013;

E. Congress barring the New York Electoral College vote for Barack Obama. F. Congress to show cause why it should not hold the $43 Trillion Dollar theft by

Barack Obama et al. since 2003 null and void under the 14th Amendment Section 4;

____________________________________________________________________ 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 Brooklyn, New York 11238

Cell-845-901-6767; [email protected]

Iilr re Lnrlstopner-Irarl: strunk @ in esse a private u.s. citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FoR A WRIT oF MANDAMUS

AFFIDAVIT OF'SERVICESTATE OF NEW YORK

COTJNTY OF'KINGS

)) ss.

)

Accordingly,I, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:

a. Am over 18 years ofage and not a party to this action.b. My place of business is located atril-.c' On DECEMBER 28 2012, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of the FILING NoTIcE FoRTHE In re Christopher'Earl: Strunk @ in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary ig,rrtrou rona wRrT oF II'IANDAMUS wrrH PtrrrIoNER's AFFTDAvIT IN suppoRT wrrg ExHrBrrs ANIIEXED aFFTRMEDDECEMBER 26, 2ol2 with each FILING NorIcE sealed in a properly addressed envelope to each respondent listedbelow for delivery by USpS regular mail.d' on DECEMBER 28, 2ol2,l caused each copy with proper postage for service by first class mail on the listed Electors andwhere each envelope was properly add.ressed with the tlotification "URGENT Ldcru SERVICE" and . pERSoNAL &CoNFIDENTIAL" in the lower left hand corner of the envelop that was then a"po"iiea with the USpS for service upon:

1' P. David Soares Office of Albany District Attomey 6 Lodge Street, Roorn 401, Albany, Ny 122072' Robert T. Johnson The Office of the Bronx county Districl Attomey 198 East l6lst Street Bronx,Ny 104513. Frank A. Sedita, III Erie County District Attomey;s of6ce 25 Delaware Avenue Buffalo, New y ork 142024. Charles J. Hynes Kings County District Attomey's Office 350 Jay Steet Brooklyn, Ne*'yorb Nff t iZOt5. Saadra Doorley Momoe Comty District Attomey's Office.47 South Fiuhugh s'treet noct esiJi Nv i+Or+6. Kathleen M. Rice_Office of Nassau County District Attomey 262 Old Country Road Ulneota, 1iy t tlOt7. C)'rus R' Vance, Jr The New York County District Attomey's OfEce One Hogan place Wew yort<, Ni tOOtg8' William J. Fitzpatrick onondaga county DA's office Criminal Courts Buildin'g - 4th Floor soi ioufl, st"t" street Syracuse, N y L32029. Francis D. Phillips Office of the Orange County District Attorney 40 Matthews-Str""t CoJ"r\ Ny i09Z+i0' fucliard A. Brown Queens County District Attomey's Office t2i-01 Queens Bouievard Kew Gardens, New -fork i i4i5I 1' Thomas J' Spota suffolk County District Attomey'soffice North County C_omplex - grrldi"g z-z v-e-terans u"-"rl"r gigrr*ay Hauppauge, Ny I lTgg12. Gwen Wilkinso_n office of Tompkins Comty District Attomey 320 Noih Tioga street taaci New-yort 1ag50

14. JanetDiFioreofficeofWestchesterDistrictAtto-eytttDT.MartiniutheiKing, Jr.arva.white"plains,Newyork1060l" 15. Joshua PepperNYS Assiatant Attomey General odce of Attomey General l2diroadway Nv irv iorzr16. Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, Ny 1220217. Gerald D. Jennings of I 135 New Scotland Road _ Albany, Ny 1220g18. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, Ny 10+6619 . Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, Ny I 047320. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street - Buffalo, Ny 1420g21. Felix Oftiz 189 B 33rd Street - Brooklyn, Ny I 123222. Hakeem Jefties 35 Underhill Avenu e, #2A - Brooklyn, Ny I 123 g23. Bill DeBlasio of 442 tlth Srreet - Brooklyn, Ny I lil524. Robert Dusl 164 Croydon Road - Rochester, Ny 1461025. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deafield Drive - Rochester, Ny 1460926. Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road - Great Neck, Ny I l20l27. Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #gF - New york Ny 1002528. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G - New york, Ny 1002529. Sheldon Silver of550 Grand Street, #5A - New york, Ny I000230. Keith L.T. Wnghtof 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New york, Ny 1003731. Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A - New york, Ny 1000132. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street - New york, Ny 1002733. Scott Stringer of I 55 West Tlst Street, #3A -- New yorlq I'Iy 1002334. Emily Giske of 440 West24th Street - New york, Ny 1001435. Scott Adams of 1 1 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard parlq I'Iy 14127

36. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive - Syracuse, Ny 1322437. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road - Orangeburg, Ny 1096238. Anne Marie Anza1one2827 481tr Steet - Astoria, Ny 1110339. Grace l\4eng of 14714 34th Avenue _ Flushing, Ny 1135440. Archie Spigner of 1 l2l0 l75th Steet - Jamaica, Ny I 143341. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, I.Iy 1170442. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, Ny 14g5043. Sheila Cornar 29 Depot Street -. Middie Granville. Ny 12g4944. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue - yonkers, Ny 1071045. Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 47g Russell Washington, DC 20S10

Sworn to before mefhia}$ay of December 2A72

KAI\4AL P SONINotary Public, Siate of New york

No.01306089949Qualified in Kinqs Counrv

Commission Expires*March gi, ZOtS

++Nffi

http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/

ii

PETITIONER

Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 Brooklyn, New York 11238


RESPONDENTS

The Honorable Irvin B. Nathan Attorney General for the Washington District of Columbia 441 4th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 The Honorable Karen L. Haas Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Capitol, Room H154, Washington, DC 20515–6601 John A. Boehner Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives 1011 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 Senator Mitch McConnell United States Senate 317 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-1702 Senator Harry Reid United States Senate 522 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-2803 Senator Charles E. Schumer United States Senate 322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-3201 Senator Kirsten Gillibrand United States Senate Washington, D.C. Office: 478 Russell Senate Office Building, District of Columbia 20510-3204

Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. President of the U.S. Senate c/o the White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500; Barack Obama c/o the White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500; Andrew Cuomo Governor of New York State The New York State Capitol Albany, New York 12224 Hon. David I. Schmidt J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S. Part 1 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11207 Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S. Part 27. 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11207 Steven C. Farkas, Esq. of COLLERAN, O’HARA & MILLS, L.L.P. Representing Mario Cilento 1225 Franklin Avenue, Suite 450 Garden City, New York 11530 Joshua Pepper NYS Assist. A.G. Office of the NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway 24th Floor New York, New York 10171

In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk @ in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

AFFIDA\IT OF'SERVICESTATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF KINGS

Accordingly,I, being duly sworn, depose and say under ponalty of perjury:

Am over 18 years ofage and not a party to this action.My place of business is located aIGEE-IFOn DECEMBER 28 2O12, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed bound. copy of theIn re Christopher-Earl: Strunk @ in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary-PETITION FOR A WRIT OF IT,IAIiIDAIVIUS WITH PETITIONER'S AFF'IDAVIT IN SUPPORT WITHEXHIBITS ANIIEXED AFFIRMED DTCEMBER 26' 2OL2 sealed in a properly add.ressed envelope toeach respondent listed below for delivery by USPSOn DECEMBER 28, 2Ol2,l caused each copy with proper postage for service by PRIORITy MAIL on thelisted Electors and where each envelope was properly addressed with the Notification "URGENT LEGALSERVICE' and " PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL" in the lower left hand corner sent with of the envelopthat was then deposited with the USPS for service upon:The Honorable Irvin B. Nathan, Attorney General for the Washington District of Columbia Ml 4thstreet, NWWashington, DC 20001 CM:'7 0122210000146343026The Honorable Kuren L Haas, Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Capitol, Room H154,washington, DC 205 I 5+60 I CIrt: 7 AD22rcAA014$ 4 A25

r John A. Boehner Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives 1011 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515DC: 03040370000045247 452

. Senator Miteh MeConnell United States Senate 317 Russell

)) ss.

)

a.b.

Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-1702

.v

DC: 031 12550000144262132e Senator Harry Reid United States Senate 522

031 1255000014426212sHart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-2803 DC:

r Senator Charles E. Schumer United States Senate 322Hurt Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-3201DC: 03 1 1255 0000144262118

r Senator Kirsten Gillibrand United States Senate Washington, D.C. Office: 478 Russell Senate Ofiice Building,District of Columbia 20 5 l0 -3204 DC : 03 1 1 2 5 5 0000 I 442621 0l

o Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. President of the U.S. Senate c/o the White House 1600 Pen:rsylvania Avenue NWWashington, DC 20500; DC: 03 1 1 255 0000144262064

o Barack Obama c/o the White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500; DC:031 12s5000014426207t

o Andrew Cuomo Governor of New York State The New York State Capitol Albany, New York 12224 DC:031 125s0000144262002

. Hon. David I. Schmidt J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S. Part 1 360 AdamsStreet Brooklyn New York 11207 DC:03 i20860000172554536

r Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S. Part 2i. 360 AdamsSfreet Brooklyn New York 1 1207 DC: 03 I 125500A0744262057

o Steven C. Farkas, Esq. of COLLERAN, O'HAzu{ & MILLS, L.L.P. 1225 Franklin Avenue, Suite 450 GardenCity, New York 1 1530 DC: 03 1 12550000144262A88

' Joshua PepperNYS Assist. A.G. Office of the NYS Attomey General 120 Broadway 24m FloorbNew york, NewYork 10171 DC: 03 1 1255 0000144262095

Sworn to before meThis -sl$gday of Dec ember 2Ol2

KAlvlAL p SON|Notary putrlic,_State of New york

_ No.01306089949^ Qualified in Kinos Counrvcomm ission Expires -March

Cl', ZOt S

12- -OP ________________________________________________

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________________________________________________________________


PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS ____________________________________________________________________ Christopher-Earl: Strunk© in esse private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary with injury in re the criminal usurpation of the office of POTUS by Barack Obama’s ineligibility under U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 and related law in

etitioner’s Original Proceeding for writ of mandamus FRAP Rule 21 Order of: P A. Stay New York State Justices in the matter of their denial of Petitioner due process

and equal treatment due under the 14th Amt. of the U.S. Constitution and NYS Constitution and related law as to denial of trial of the facts as compelling public interest as to forgery crime aided and abetted by Electors- a Quo Warranto matter;




E. Congress barring the New York Electoral College vote for Barack Obama. F. Congress to show cause why it should not hold the $43 Trillion Dollar theft by

Barack Obama et al. since 2003 null and void under the 14th Amendment Section 4; ____________________________________________________________________

593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 Brooklyn, New York 11238

Cell-845-901-6767; [email protected] Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse

PETITIONER

Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 Brooklyn, New York 11238


RESPONDENTS

The Honorable Irvin B. Nathan Attorney General for the Washington District of Columbia 441 4th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 The Honorable Karen L. Haas Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Capitol, Room H154, Washington, DC 20515–6601 John A. Boehner Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives 1011 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 Senator Mitch McConnell United States Senate 317 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-1702 Senator Harry Reid United States Senate 522 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-2803 Senator Charles E. Schumer United States Senate 322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-3201 Senator Kirsten Gillibrand United States Senate Washington, D.C. Office: 478 Russell Senate Office Building, District of Columbia 20510-3204

Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. President of the U.S. Senate c/o the White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500; Barack Obama c/o the White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500; Andrew Cuomo Governor of New York State The New York State Capitol Albany, New York 12224 Hon. David I. Schmidt J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S. Part 1 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11207 Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S. Part 27. 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11207 Steven C. Farkas, Esq. of COLLERAN, O’HARA & MILLS, L.L.P. Representing Mario Cilento 1225 Franklin Avenue, Suite 450 Garden City, New York 11530 Joshua Pepper NYS Assist. A.G. Office of the NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway 24th Floor New York, New York 10171

mailto:[email protected]

http://oag.dc.gov/DC/OAG/About+OAG/Who+We+Are/Director+Biography/Attorney+General+Irvin+B.+Nathan

http://oag.dc.gov/DC/OAG/About+OAG/Who+We+Are/Director+Biography/Attorney+General+Irvin+B.+Nathan

AFFIDAVIT: In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS A. Stay New York State Justices in the matter of their denial of Petitioner

due process and equal treatment due under the 14th Amt. of the U.S. Constitution and NYS Constitution and related law as to denial of trial of the facts as compelling public interest as to forgery crime aided and abetted by Electors- a Quo Warranto matter;




E. Congress barring the New York Electoral College vote for Barack Obama. F. Congress to show cause why it should not hold the $43 Trillion Dollar

theft by Barack Obama et al. since 2003 null and void under the 14th Amendment Section 4;

Exhibit A: “Public” U.S. Citizen on January 23, 2009 duly fired Barack Hussein Obama II for being ineligible for POTUS under A2S1C5 Exhibit B: non-surety “Private” natural-born U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary filing with notice to US Treasury Exhibit C: Notice of Petition with Petition filied in NYS Supreme Court County of Kings with Index No.: 21948-2012 Exhibit D: Note of Issue with Certificate of Readiness for Trial Exhibit E: Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Petition - Index No.: 21948-2012 Exhibit F: Decision and Order to dismiss Complaint - Index No.: 6500-2011 Exhibit G: Proposed OSC for the Petition - Index No.: 21948-2012 Exhibit H: official Court docket for the Petition - Index No.: 21948-2012 Exhibit I: June 9, 2012 Affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio of Maricopa County AZ. Exhibit J: November 12, 2012 Affidavit of Michael Zullo Investigator Exhibit K: Decision and Orders in the USDC DC case no.: 2010-cv-00486 Exhibit L: February 2012 report by Jerome Corsi on HSBC $$ Laundering Exhibit M: December 2012 report by Reuters on HSBC $1.9 Bil. Fine Exhibit N: Press Release regarding Spire Group RICO case filing in EDNY Exhibit O: List of Obama Executive Orders PDF available at : http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/

Table of Authorities (abbreviated)

U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 2, i.e. A2S1C2 states “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.” United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

U.S. Constitution Article 4 full faith and credit provisions

U.S. Constitution 14th Amendment Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

US Constitution Amendments; 12th, 20th, 25th as to POTUS

the Declaration of Independence of 1776 that adopted as the foundation for the respective States’ constitutions, including that of New York on April 20, 1777,

Federal Authorities FRAP Rule §21 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through §2390 Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 92 S. Ct. 2646, 33 L. Ed. 2d 626 [1972], quoting WILLIAM BLACKSTONE

AFFIDAVIT


PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF KINGS ) I, Christopher–Earl : Strunk © in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say:

1. Petitioner Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse self represented without an

attorney, is a duly registered voter of the 64th Election District of the 57th

Assembly District (AD) and within the New York 8th U.S. House District at 593

Vanderbilt Avenue – 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 for ten years with email:

[email protected] and cell phone 845-901-6767, and is an enrolled member of

the Republican Party who participated at the November 6, 2012 General

Election there voted entirely for the Republican Party line of candidates,

electors of Mitt Romney for President of the United States (POTUS) and Wendy

Long for US Senate from New York..

2. As a matter of Judicial Notice there is controlling history and law

regarding construction of the Declaration of Independence of 1776 that was

adopted as the foundation for the respective States’ constitutions, including

that of New York on April 20, 1777, that the Revolution expressly eliminated

the feudal doctrine of perpetual allegiance, or that condition based upon a

person’s soil birthright subjugation as property of an absolute sovereign, and

http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 1 of 50


3 . That the Founders replaced petpehral allegiance with tJw human natural

law doctrine of Natural Born Citizen inheritance of allegiance from his parents

and or that of the father; and that the Usurper's Courts in which Petitioner

petitions revert to the prior perpetual allegiance as if t h e 14th Amendment to

the U.S. Constitution were to amend the A2S1C5 (11 "natural-born Citizen"

clause by conflating the term person born on soiI as if a U.S. Citizen without

regard to the status of the parents, and as if *subject to the jurisdictionn were

needless repetition- there is no "birthright citizenship" per se; and with this in

mind, by admission Barack Hussein Obama II at the time of his birth, his

father was a British subject married to Stanley Ann Dunham a minor aged

U.S . Citizen in February 1961.

4. That Petitioner when as "Publicn U.S. Citizen on January 23, 2009 duly

fired Barack Hussein Obama I1 (hereinafter known as the "Usurper" and or

"SOEBARKAH") when Obarna offered his oath on January 20, 2009 as if

eligible under A2SlC5 for the ofice of the POTUS executive with power of

attorney over accounts with the U.S. Treasury and other executive duties (see

Exhibit A), when in fact Obama is ineligible and his wefact is void in ab initio; 5 and notu4thstanding dl his acts being void a b initio the office of POTUS is

again about to be usurped to Petitioner's detriment and injury; and

5. That Petitione~, by specid appearance of Christopher- Earl: S t a n k in

United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5: 'No Person except a natural born Citlzen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the t ime of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eiigible to the Ofice of Resident; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to t h e Age of thnty fie Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States,"

http://www .scribd. wmldoc/1177392921 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 2 of 50

esse, now is a non-sure@ "Private" natural-born U.S. Citizen secured

beneficiary, who on October 15, 2012 duly fded a Notice of Release without

Consideration that under U.S. Constitution Article 4 full faith and credit

provisions is binding upon the State of New York and its New York County sub-

division within the city of New York to relieve it of further obligation as the

trustee-owner of the Usufruct debtor organized on January 24, 1947; and that

as of December 12, 2012 Petitioner subsequent to filing his "Uniform

Commercial Code" form UCC-1 Initial Financial Statement is the secured

beneficiary of the Usufruct as had been previously noticed in November 2009 to

Timothy Franz Geithner of the U.S. Treasury with pending filings to the

Treasury and 1RS (see Exhfbit B);

6. That as background to this petition original proceeding petition for a writ

of mandamus of the State and Federal respondents, in January 1999 Petitioner

started a series of court cases challenging the obvious conuption of persons

with the Democratic and Republican Party who colluded to among other things

fixed the 2008 election of POTUS along with a very long list of persons and

organizations, that constitute by f o m d definition "the enterprise" that now act

with the Usurper to suspend t h e U.S. Constitution in order to limit individual

freedom and liberty and coordinate a $43 Trillion Dollars theft. 2168

Petitioner USDC EDNY case Strunk v Congress 9 9 - c v - w (1999) Chdenged the "Capping of the numbers of seats in Congress that diminishes votes suffrage;

Petitioner USDC EDNY case Strunk v US HUD 99-cv-& (1999) Challenged the taking of his property by conversion and .

htt~:ll~ww.sc~bd.com/doc/l177392921 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 3 of 50

Petitioner USDC EDNY case Stmnk v Congress 00-cv-7177 (2000) Challenged the New York State Legislature arbitrary basis for the 2000 Electoral College under A2S1 C2 ( p d I 1 7 1 3 Petitioner EDNY Case Thomas et al. v Federal Reserve BmkEof NY

(2007) Challenged the pump and dump conversion of red property in Bed Stuy. Brooklyn by HUD connected speculators using sub-prime instruments

~l $c drl96 9 Petitioner USDC EDNY case Strunk v CIA (2008) Challenge the CIA under FOIA to produce documents for deceased Jesuit, Fr. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin S.J.- father of the new age movement and the PRC;

08egQw? 0, Petitioner case USDC EDNY Strunk v. NY SOS (2008) ChalIenged the 2008 NY Electoral College as Public Officers Eao(dimg two jobs for pay.

Petitioner W S case Strunk v Paterson 29641. (2008) Article 78 State Petition challenging the 2008 NYS Electoral College members holding two jobs for pay contrary to the State Constitution;

Petitioner NYS case Stmnk v Paterson 29642 (2008) State Complaint depending upon the laus of the case from 29641-08 challenging their right t o vote for an ineligible person far POTUS (active);

Petitioner USDC DC Case Strunk v US DOS and DHS 08-cv-2234 (2008) FOIA request for the passport and travel records for Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama, Soetoro) and Barack Htrssein Qbama I1 - on appeal;

oscf4Y K% Petitioner USDC EDNY Case Stmnk (intervener) v ACORN* (2010) 9 Intervener as a prior HUD contractor on the side of the U S Government challenging the "friendly" nature of the suit as a fraud upon the court;

7. That there has been steadv growth of an "Enterprisen as defined by civil

RICO standards since 1986 that has served as a vehicle to forward a huge theft

of U.S. Taxpayer backed securities and obligations in use by the Federal

Reserve Banking system that is backed by public and private U.S. Citizen

property as if tacit moral obligation contract existed; however, the clueless US

Citizen sureties were not afforded due process and equal protection when the

enterprise began in earnest after the 1999 Clinton Administration elimination

httr,://~vrnv.s~bd.coWdac~1177~~2~2/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION. Page 4 of 50

of the 1999 Glass-Steagle Act protection to comingle risky investment and

commercial banking activities; and

8. That in 1999 then HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo as the single fiduciary

devised rules and policy to increase and conceal non performing loans for use

by the Freddie Mac FDR era quasi public entity that has also assumed control

over a huge number of real property mortgages as a result of the 1986 collapse

of the Saving and Loan Industry then absorbed using the Resolution Trust

Corporation and large commercial banking industry that in short was devised

among Pritzker, Dworman, Annenberg, Ayers, Geithner, and other powerful

families to further efforts of the enterprise to convert property and launder the

proceeds with questionable securities and general accounting practices

coordinated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York with members; and

9. In addition to the foregoing, Affirmant based upon information and belief

contends that the Enterprise’s present pawn, Barack Obama, when fully

understood that Karl Marx’s spiritual mentor is Fr. Luigi Taparelli S.J. whose

“Social Justice Doctrine” of 1832 is now the Usurper’s ideology of Utopian

Islamic dualism, underlies his outrageously sinister acts since entering public

office in Illinois; and of the acts, the Usurper is now clearly guilty of forgery,

spoliation, concealment, intimidation of witnesses and racketeering; and

10. That the controversy swirling around the Usurper’s eligibility for the

office of POTUS since 2008 is the matter of his alleged Common Law citizen

status as if a Native-born Citizen, somehow notwithstanding the allegiance

status of his parents, rather than a Natural Law Natural-born Citizen born on


soil to married U.S. Citizen parents; and that nevertheless Barack Hussein

Osama II is a British Subject with dual allegiance at birth alleged August 4,

1961 (we do not actually know the real date) wherever that birth happened,

because in February 1961 according to Hawaii Court records the British

Subject father was married to the minor U.S. Citizen mother in wedlock to a

majority aged British subject foreign alien student who then were duly divorced

on March 20, 1964; and

11. That then when in the mother’s custody during her 2nd marriage Barack

Obama was adopted in Indonesia by his Indonesian Citizen step-father, Lolo

Soetoro, who gave the name “SOEBARKAH” according to the U.S. State

Department record affirmed August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and

12. Then thereafter, as an Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Barry

Soetoro) reentered the USA in 1971 alone without a U.S. Passport to live with

his grandmother who: (i) obtained foreign student funding, (ii) illegally obtained

a stolen Social Security Number no later than 1980, (iii) forged a Selective

Service filing dated 1980, and now after the death of the mischievous

grandmother, inter alia SOEBARKAH in furtherance of usurpation of the office

of POTUS no later than April 25, 2011, according to more than three experts,

forged a Long Form Certificate of Birth as if of Hawaii and is the simple matter

before this court for a trial of facts.

13. That inter alia Petitioner further contends based upon information and

belief that notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, that

Barack Obama has multiple allegiances maybe as many as five (5) British,


Kenyan, Indonesian, Canadian, United States by oath of office, and despite

taking an oath owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, the Usurper

levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies al-

Qaida, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GÜLEN Movement and Iran

against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand

through Morocco to replace the Ottoman Caliphate dismantled by Winston

Churchill and T. E. Lawrence in 1921, and giving the enemies / Enterprise aid

and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason; and

that any candidate elector and or public officer who would aid and abet Barack

Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of

felony, sedition and treason.

14. That based upon information and belief Barack Obama is the asset of the

Pilgrim Society (2), Le Cercle (3), 1001 Club (4), Commercial Club of Chicago (5),

Sovereign Military Order of Malta (6), Council for National Policy (7), whose

powerful membership overlaps with the directorships in various think tanks,


2

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_pilgrimsociety01.htm

3 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_lecercle07.htm#The_Vatican-Paneuropa_network 4 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_1001club01.htm 5 http://commercialclubchicago.org/ 6 http://www.orderofmalta.int/?lang=en 7 http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Council_for_National_Policy

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 7 of 50

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_pilgrimsociety01.htm

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_lecercle07.htm#The_Vatican-Paneuropa_network

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_lecercle07.htm#The_Vatican-Paneuropa_network

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_1001club01.htm

http://commercialclubchicago.org/

http://www.orderofmalta.int/?lang=en

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Council_for_National_Policy

mainstream media, financial institutions, law firms, corporations, and far

more secret societies hardly worth mentioning; that all covertly support the

Usurper to complete the European Union -EU (Fourth Reich), as directed by Fr.

Peter–Hans Kovenbach, S.J. to dissolve all Eurasian national secular borders,

and form the Mediterranean Union, as King Juan Carlos of Jerusalem’s crown

jewel, at the hilt of the neo Babylonian Caliphate scimitar Arc of Crisis swath

from Thailand to Morocco, hewn by their crown prince SOEBARKAH - Obama

fealty “There is no other God than Allah!” (8) allegiance to the Opus Dei - Muslim

Brotherhood – GÜLEN / EU Utopian Islamic Fascist Alliance (UIFA) to

transform United States national sovereignty by plundering our youth by war

and U.S. Taxpayer $43 trillion Dollars wealth by theft.

15. Petitioner contends based upon information and belief, that the UIFA

overthrow of the enemy of the Bedouin and al Qaeda, the U.S. ally was Berber

Muammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi (June 1942 – 20 October 2011)

since surrendering to George W. Bush in 2003, renders Libyan assets to UIFA

with IMF control over the African Union by assassination of its financier-leader

and now underlies the Crown Prince SOEBARKAH and Hapsburg / Pallavicini

(9) family asset Hillary Clinton (like with the Rothschild – “Red Shield”) deal

with UIFA Muslim Brotherhood associate President Mohamed Morsi and

Mohamed al-Zawahiri of Egypt, sought with the younger brother of Al Qaeda

leader Ayman al-Zawahiri to have Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, commonly


8 http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obamas-ring-there-is-no-god-but-allah/ 9 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pallavicini


http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obamas-ring-there-is-no-god-but-allah/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pallavicini

known in the United States as "The Blind Sheikh", released from Federal prison

by using al Qaida to kidnap the "Ambassador" Christopher Stevens from the

Benghazi CIA "mission" or CIA (Georgetown's Patraeus contracted) safe house

(a residential rental property), where the Libyan munitions magic mystery tour

still is underway for arms transfer to UIFA assets in Syria; and that the

kidnapping scheme was easy to devise for the exchange of CIA agent Stevens

for the Blind Sheikh, since the actual “U.S. Consulate” was safely guarded in

Tripoli by the State Department Security Service far away from the CIA rouge

arms deal mission agents protected by U.S. National secrecy in Benghazi; and

16. However on September 11, 2012, the best made plans for the attack /

kidnapping by al Qaida went sideways due to the fact that two Navy Seals

disobeyed CIA orders to stand-down and joined the defenders to kill more than

100 al Qaida attackers during the five hour fire fight that ended by their death,

the Ambassador rape /death, the continued incarceration of The Blind Sheikh,

the slaughter of Egyptian Coptics, Israelis blamed for the movie trailer, and the

media coordinated support of the badly managed false flag cover-up by

Ambassador Susan Rice, Secretary Clinton, Secretary Patraeus, Secretary Leon

Panetta, and the Usurper UIFA Crown Prince speech at the United Nations.

17. That the Usurper on the September 19, 2012 appeared on the Letterman

Show to reinforce the false flag Muslim protest of a supposed movie “Trailer”

cover story, and that had somehow the unfortunate misunderstanding in

Benghazi was merely a spontaneous reaction that got out of control by

outraged Muslims to a anti-Muslim movie trailer produced in Hollywood that


had defamed Islam (10); a bold manufactured lie to cover the false flag attack /

kidnapping on the “trailer” that in fact was produced by a Palestinian National,

a Federal probationer from a 1999 bank fraud conviction, for the Muslim

Brotherhood and Hamas along with the Palestinian terrorist cousin of Walid

Shoebat (11) that thereby involves Attorney General Eric Holder and the FBI in

support of the false flag abduction of U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher

Stevens, gun running, deaths and treason, and perhaps World War III due to

events spinning out of control in Syria!

18. That the Usurper’s actions with the enterprise are outrageously ignored

by the State and Federal Courts, and that include the overthrown of legitimate

allies of the U.S., the commission of illegal wars, assassinations of foreign and

U.S. Citizens, and institutional tyrannical dictatorship by the executive by

unconstitutional executive orders theft with impunity of the Executive,

Congress, Courts and NGOs.

19. Undaunted by the enormity of ongoing crimes and obvious fix that is in,

Petitioner after the General Election of November 6, 2012, filed a new Petition

in New York State Court in Kings County with Index No: 21948-2012 on

November 14, 2012 for a mandamus of the New York Electoral College before it

would consider voting for the Usurper by December 17, 2012 (see Exhibit C) ;

and therein Petitioner requests a trial of the facts associated with the forged


10 http://www.washingtonpost.com/obama-us-consulate-attack-in-libya-not-an-act-of-war/2012/09/19/8e5b47ba-021f-11e2-bbf0-e33b4ee2f0e8_video.html?tid=pm_vid&reload=true%29. 11 http://shoebat.com/shoebat-foundation/innocence-of-muslims/


http://www.washingtonpost.com/obama-us-consulate-attack-in-libya-not-an-act-of-war/2012/09/19/8e5b47ba-021f-11e2-bbf0-e33b4ee2f0e8_video.html?tid=pm_vid&reload=true%29



http://shoebat.com/shoebat-foundation/innocence-of-muslims/

instrument issued by the Usurper on 27 April 2011 at a White House Press

Conference with the intent that the forgery be used by the Usurper to again

Usurp the office of POTUS for a second term as a matter that would each vote

make the member an accessory after the fact to a felony sedition and treason

as defined with 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through §2390 and related law,

20. That as shown in Exhibit C, Petitioner duly served a complaint upon 14

respective District Attorneys in New York, and therein each complaint

Petitioner affirms that

“there is a preponderance of evidence proving that the April 25, 2011 forged public document is for the purpose of usurping the POTUS, and that were any New York State Public Officer Electors to cast a vote aiding abetting each crime the civil servant would be an accessory after the fact to a felony under New York Penal Law; and as such Affirmant provides due notice hereby as a matter of standing guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through §2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law § 16-100, N.Y.S. CPLR § 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law § 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws…”

21. That on December 7, 2012. Petitioner filed a Note of Issue with

Certificate of Readiness for Trial (see Exhibit D) after the Petition shown as

Exhibit C was joined on November 19, 2012 before New York State Supreme

Court Justice David I. Schmidt by application for order to show cause (OSC)

that was there rejected; and


22. That inter alia Petitioner contends that by casting a vote for Barack

Obama each such Respondent listed therein and herein may be charged with

the crime of accessory after the fact of a felony committed on or about 25 April

2011 by persons as yet named, aided and abetted by White House Press

Secretary Jay Carney, the President’s Director of Communications Dan Pfeiffer,


White House Counsel Bob Bauer, and Barack Obama who during the 27 April

2011 White House Press Conference, see the transcript evidence herein (see

Exhibit D-1), all expressly presented a forged instrument to the People of the

United States, a crime compounded by spoliation, concealment, perjury,

tampering with the public record, intimidation of witnesses & other crimes; and

23. That a trial of the facts in the matter of a felony forgery with

expert testimony of Paul Edward Irey is affirmed December 4, 2012 (see

Exhibit D-2) as an urgent matter of public interest with time of the essence

and imminent irreparable harm; and

24. That the Petition with Notice of Intent to file an application for

OSC was served upon the members of the New York State legislature’s Electoral

College body by certified mail with a return receipt request on November 14,

2012 and then by follow-up regular mail on November 30, 2012 (see Exhibit D-

3); and that the issues were joined by the purchase of an RJI on November 16,

2012 (see Exhibit D-4) and appearance of Petitioner and the New York state

attorney general office’s Assistant Attorney General Joshua Pepper of the

Litigation Bureau before the Hon. David I. Schmidt who for reasons explained

in his order (see Exhibit D-5) thereafter declined to sign the order to show

cause application, and that Petitioner then requested reconsideration by

Justice Schmidt on November 30, 2012 with due notice also given to the Hon.

Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. for reconsideration pending see

http://www.scribd.com/doc/112747771/.

25. The Petition affidavit in support of his note of issue and certificate



of readiness by CPLR §3402 shown as Exhibit D was filed in good faith for a

trial of issues by December 14, 2012 with partial severance for the benefit of

captioned Respondent electors of the New York State Legislature’s Electoral

College and members of Congress before the deadline to vote by December 17,

2012 – now passed; and is now to be tallied in Congressional joint chamber

after January 3, 2013 for candidates for the office of POTUS when the next

Congress convenes.

26. So what does Petitioner reasonably expect from this humble

Court? A remedy for each of the following matters within the jurisdiction and

authority of this Court to resolve: for Christopher-Earl: Strunk© in esse, a

private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary with injury in re the criminal

usurpation of the office of POTUS by Barack Obama’s ineligibility under U.S.

Constitution A2S1C5 and related law, Petitions by this Original Proceeding for

writ of mandamus FRAP Rule 21 Order of:

A.

Stay of New York State Justices in the matter of their denial of Petitioner due process and equal treatment due under the 14th Amt. of the U.S.

Constitution and NYS Constitution and related law as to denial of trial of the facts as compelling public interest as to forgery crime aided and

abetted by Electors- a Quo Warranto matter;

27. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in this

Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the Court Panel with paragraphs 1

through 26 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length.

28. That Petitioner wishes Stay equity relief of New York State Justices

in the matter of their denial of Petitioner due process and equal treatment due


under the 14th Amendment. of the U.S. Constitution and NYS Constitution and

related law as to denial of trial of the facts as compelling public interest as to

forgery crime aided and abetted by Electors- in what amounts to a Quo

Warranto matter.

29. That on December 21, 2012 in response to service of the Petition

shown as C and the Note of Issue shown as Exhibit D in the Petition Strunk v

Jeffries et al. in New York State Supreme Court in the County Of Kings with

Index No.: 21948-2012, Developer Andrew Farkas’ relative Steven C. Farkas,

Esq. of COLLERAN, O’HARA & MILLS, L.L.P. representing Mario Cilento the

New York Electoral College member from Nassau County made an appearance

with memorandum and a motion to dismiss the Petition with sanctions with a

January 22, 2013 return date (see Exhibit E annexed without sub-exhibits A

& B: the Petition shown as Exhibit C, and order shown as exhibit F); and

30. That the return date for the Motion shown as Exhibit E is long

after the beginning of the next Executive term of Office of POTUS when he is to

take his oath January 20, 2013 begins, were Petitioner to not seek this forum

for relief would render all Petitioners efforts moot; and would interfere as

intertwined with Petitioner’s appeal in with Appeal case 12-5515 filing due by

February 22, 2013 in the New York State Supreme Court Second Department

Appellate Division in that Petitioner on March 22, 2011 had filed the complaint

based on common law fraud injury case Strunk v. NYS Board of Elections et al.

in Kings County with Index No.: 2011-6500 that subsequently on April 11

2012 was then dismissed with sanctions and prejudice (see Exhibit F);


31. The Order shown as Exhibit F bars Petitioner from further suing

the named parties in the case with Index No.: 2011-6500 in their Official and

or individual capacity without seeking permission of New York State Supreme

Court Justice Arthur M. Schack as follows:

NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; JAMES A. WALSH / Co-Chair, DOUGLAS A. KELLNER / Co-Chair, EVELYN J. AQUILA / Commissioner, GREGORY P. PETERSON / Commissioner, Deputy Director TODD D. VALENTINE, Deputy Director STANLEY ZALEN; ANDREW CUOMO, ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN, THOMAS P. DINAPOLI, RUTH NOEMÍ COLÓN, Fr. JOSEPH A. O'HARE, S.J.; Fr. JOSEPH P. PARKES, S.J.; FREDERICK A.O. SCHWARZ, JR.; (the city of New York’s Campaign Finance Board) PETER G. PETERSEN, ZBIGNIEW KAIMIERZ BRZEZINSKI; MARK BRZEZINSKI; JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.; SOEBARKAH (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama II, Steve Dunham); NANCY PELOSI; DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE COMMITTEE OF THE WORKING FAMILIES PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE; RÓGER CALERO; THE SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY; IAN J. BRZEZINSKI; JOHN SIDNEY MCCAIN III; JOHN A. BOEHNER; THE NEW YORK STATE REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE; THE NEW YORK STATE COMMITTEE OF THE INDEPENDENCE PARTY; STATE COMMITTEE OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE; PENNY S. PRITZKER; GEORGE SOROS; OBAMA FOR AMERICA; OBAMA VICTORY FUND; MCCAIN VICTORY 2008; MCCAIN-PALIN VICTORY 2008; John and Jane Does; and XYZ Entities.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%B3ger_Calero

32. That the Petition shown as Exhibit C does not name any of the above

parties nor did Petitioner act in bad faith with the Order shown as Exhibit F.

33. That on November 30, 2012, Petitioner after Justice Schmidt issued the

Order shown as Exhibit D-5 denying to sign the OSC application, submitted a

Second Affidavit in support of reconsideration of signing the OSC application

and delivered a copy to both Justices Schmidt and Schack (see Exhibit G), and

for the information of this Court Panel Petitioner annexes the entire OSC

application with the Exhibits 1 through 16, of which 14 thru 16 accompanied

the 2nd Affidavit ; and

34. That Petitioner contends in the Petitioner’s 2nd Affidavit in support of an

OSC that the Court erred in its Order shown as Exhibit D-5, quote:

6. That any person elected at the November 6, 2012 general election, including Respondents, are now certified as elected by the NYS BOE, and because Petitioner was unable to challenge the election in the pre-certification first stage that then would include the NYS BOE and not conform with the wishes of Judge Schack; but now during the post certification phase in which any congressman elect during the lame duck session of congress before those certified would appear to be sworn into office on or after January 3,. 2013 not only does not require the appearance of the NYS BOE, but as with any challenge of first impression regarding a Constitutional issue only requires Petitioner provide proper notification of the Office of the NYS Attorney General which Petitioner did by notifying Lisa Dell, Esq. by email on Friday November 16, 2012 (see Exhibit 15).; and 7. That when Joshua Pepper, Esq. NYS Assistant Attorney General from the litigation bureau, under the supervision of Lisa Dell of His Office, appeared voluntarily as an intervener at the preliminary intake hearing of this application before the Court at Courtroom 541; and thereat, Mr. Pepper disclosed that he represents the Executive including the Governor, Comptroller, Attorney General and Mr. Silver the Speaker of the Assembly;


8. Therefore how would Petitioner be held liable, and under what legal theory for another’s voluntary action applies, whether that be for an intervener as petitioner or respondent? 9. It is Petitioner’s understanding that he is unable to amend a petition per se, this is not a complaint, and even were a legal theory to require such duplication of effort, Petitioner doesn’t have sufficient funds to file a companion petition that for all intents is unnecessary, because Mr. Pepper did not appear by special appearance per se but announced to the Court he actually represents the Executive and the Speaker by name. 10. Why shouldn’t Mr. Pepper’s voluntary appearance representing those named be deemed as such without imposing further injury upon Petitioner for the acts of others whose job it is to appear without any further 14th amendment invidious deprivation of Petitioner fundamental rights too?

35. Furthermore, that by December 7, 2012, Petitioner received no response

from either chambers and or the clerk’s office until Petitioner obtained an

official copy of the Court docket whose caption has been modified to read

Strunk v. “Board of Elections” rather than “Strunk v Jeffries” that Petitioner did

not name the NYS BOE (see Exhibit H), and as such has already been

established by Petitioner at paragraph 6 quote above from his 2nd Affidavit in

Support of an OSC, that the Court erred in its Order shown as Exhibit D-5.

36. That the New York State Justices in the matter duly filed before them

have without just cause denied Petitioner fundamental due process and equal

treatment protections due, under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

and NYS Constitution and related law, when they have unreasonably denied a

trial of the facts as compelling public interest as to forgery crime aided and

abetted by Electors- as a Quo Warranto matter; and


37. Petitioner contends that according to tradition that remains true, it was

and is a citizen's duty to "raise the hue and cry" by reporting crimes, especially


felonies, to law enforcement authorities (Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 92

S. Ct. 2646, 33 L. Ed. 2d 626 [1972], quoting WILLIAM BLACKSTONE).

38. That Petitioner is an aggrieved private U.S. Citizen who has suffered

property loss associated with injury to the Usufruct organization

“CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK” that by grant of personal jurisdiction in the

case 2011-6500 is affected by the enormity of Arthur M. Schack’s actions in

the proceedings associated with the April 11, 2012 Order shown as Exhibit F;

and as such Petitioner is entitled to seek redress of grievances expressly

available under N.Y. Civil Practice Law Rules (CPLR) § 7202 entitled “Action by

person aggrieved” Where a penalty or forfeiture is given by a statute to a person

aggrieved by the act or omission of another, the person aggrieved may

commence an action to recover it.

39. That Petitioner has suffered unreasonable denial of due process

requiring a trial of the newly discovered facts proven as shown in Exhibit D-2

that would clear him of any wrong doing or bad faith in that the matter of

common law civil fraud complained of as it is inextricably intertwined with

criminal matters that under both state and the federal statute, a legitimate

effort of any prosecution or civil inquiry must prove the following elements to

obtain a misprision of felony conviction: (1) another person actually committed

a felony; (2) the defendant knew that the felony was committed; (3) the

defendant did not notify any law enforcement or judicial officer; and (4) the

defendant took affirmative steps to conceal the felony.

40. That Petitioner relies on the fifty year experience and judgment of law


enforcement officer, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County Arizona, when on

June 9, 2012 he affirmed (see Exhibit I) that a crime has been committed that

requires to determine at a civil trial what precisely constitutes active

concealment as a Question of Fact with circumstance essential for both civil

and criminal cases quote:

7. Upon close examination of the evidence, it is my belief that forgery and fraud was likely committed in key identity documents including President Obama's long form birth certificate, his Selective Service Registration card, and his Social Security number. 8. My investigators and I believe that President Obama's long-form birth certificate is a computer-generated document, was manufactured electronically, and that it did not originate in a paper format, as claimed by the White House. Most importantly, the "registrar's stamp" in the computer generated document released by the White House and posted on the White House website, may have been imported from another unknown source document. The effect of the stamp not being placed on the document pursuant to state and federal laws means that there is probable cause that the document is a forgery, and therefore, it cannot be used as verification, legal or otherwise, of the date, place or circumstances of Barack Obama's birth.


41. Further evidence that Petitioner relies on is that collected by Sheriff

Arpaio’s chief Investigator Michael Zullo affirmed by affidavit on November 12,

2012 (see Exhibit J) in search of an actual perpetrator of crime affirms quote:

44. Most importantly, the "registrar's stamp" in the computer-generated document released by the White House and posted on the White House website may have been imported from another unknown source document. The fact that the stamp cannot have been placed on the document pursuant to state and federal laws is one of many indications that the document is a forgery and, therefore, that it cannot be relied upon as verification, legal or otherwise, of the date, place or circumstances of Mr. Obama's birth. 45. The Registrar's date-stamp exhibited a similar grave anomaly, allowing it to be moved about electronically within the document - which would have been impossible if the document were the scanned and certified copy that official statements profess it to be. The Registrar's


http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Question+of+Fact

signature-stamp and date-stamp were computer-generated images that were imported into the document. They were not electronic images of actual rubber-stamp imprints inked by hand or machine on to a paper document. Accordingly, the document on the White House website is, at a minimum, misleading to the public in that it has no legal import and cannot be relied upon as a legal document carrying the full faith and credit of the State of Hawaii and verifying the date, place and other circumstances of Mr. Obama's birth. A photograph of the Registrar's date-stamp is exhibited and marked "MZa". 46. These and numerous other errors and anomalies observed after extensive forensic scrutiny of the electronic image downloaded from the White House website were inconsistent with features to be expected when a paper document is placed on the glass plate of a scanner so that it can be captured as an electrophotographic image, or when it is scanned and then processed either to enhance the clarity of the image by optical character recognition or to reduce file-size by file-compression or optimization. 47. Furthering the investigation, I returned to Hawaii for a second time. I met Mr. Duncan Sunahara, the brother of Virginia Sunahara, an infant born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961, the alleged date of Mr. Obama's birth there. Ms Sunahara died the following day, August 5, after breathing difficulties. When I met Mr. Sunahara he had recently applied to the Department of Health in Hawaii for a copy of his deceased sister's birth certificate. He told me the Department had gone to great lengths to deny him a copy of the original long-form birth certificate that a close relative is entitled by law to request and the Department is obliged by law to supply. The Cold Case Posse is compelled to consider the question why this little girl's 1961 long-form birth certificate was so disconcerting to the Hawaii Department of Health that it did not wish to issue a copy to Mr. Sunahara upon request. … 63. Notwithstanding this affidavit, it is plausible that an original birth record for Mr. Obama exists in Hawaii. Our investigation has discovered that at that time Hawaiian law contained a specific provision that permitted a Hawaiian parent of a child born anywhere in the world or any adult purporting to represent that parent, the right to register the child as Hawaiian-born. It is for this reason that two entries in the "Births" column of the local newspapers at the time do not constitute evidence that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii. They are merely evidence suggesting that a birth certificate was issued for him in Hawaii, and they tell us nothing about whether or not he was born there. In particular they do not - as the White House document purports to do - identify the hospital of birth.


64. If Mr. Obama had not in fact been born in Hawaii, the long-form original birth certificate would not have stated that he had been born in a particular hospital at a particular time, and would not have borne the signatures of the attending physician and registrar. The newspaper entries would have been identical whether he had been born in Hawaii or elsewhere in the world; but the birth records would not have been identical. 65. The existence of this law permitting out-of-country births to be registered as though they were Hawaiian births is a further reason why the Sheriff wishes his forensic investigators to be given access to the original bound volumes of birth certificates for 1961, and to be permitted to carry out forensic scrutiny of the volumes and of certain individual certificates, including that of Mr. Obama. 66. For these reasons, it is necessary for the investigators to bear in mind the possibility that the intention of the Hawaii Department of Health in refusing to allow Mr. Sunahara to have a certified copy of the original birth certificate of his deceased sister is to conceal forgery and fraud within the Department itself.

42. That the expert testimony by Paul Edward Irey is based upon the

Affidavit with Exhibits A through D affirmed December 4, 2012, shown as

Exhibit D-2 that is res ipsa loquitur; and


43. That Petitioner contends in order to clear himself of any wrong doing as

a 6th Amendment matter denied him by Judge Schack, that the body of the

crime complained of has been brought to the attention of Respondents, the

Courts and various district attorneys with authority and jurisdiction to further

investigate to no avail, and that the testimony deals with the fact that in 1961,

well before computers or such other technologies that may be in use today,

that ANY birth certificate paperwork was done either by hand and or on forms

designed for use with the mechanical typewriter technology that was then

widely used, rendering a forgery detectible; and that testimony presents the

proof of forgery in the context of then mechanical technology in use, and also


to prove the forged instrument is of current manufacturer, that the forgers use

of the Unsharp Mask software by Adobe to create a Halo around lettering thus

also sets the chain of custody of the forgery along with where it was

manufactured.


44. That the urgency of a trial on the facts of a crime having been committed

is essential to clear Petitioner, and is notwithstanding whether the actual

perpetrator(s) or accessories before the fact of the forgery are before this Court

as a criminal matter afforded jurisdiction elsewhere; and nevertheless

Petitioner is entitled a forum under this petition for a trial of the fact of a

forgery per se that the electoral college body as necessary public policy and law

would become actual accessories by their vote, notwithstanding any matter

related to the legal issues referenced above; and therefore, mandates that this

trial must deal exclusively with the proof of the actual forgery now after

December 17, 2012 and before January 7, 2013, and at which trial Petitioner

will present expert testimony by Typographer Graphics Expert Paul Edward

Irey who has his latest work published by the Washington Times on November

19, 2012 and then updated and published again on December 5, 2012 shown

as Exhibit D-2A and therein Mr. Irey states quote:

The important section of the Obama long form birth certificate is displayed below and enlarged to fit this page. We have found 24 proofs of forgery on this document so far and are showing 5 areas of our easiest to understand evidence here. We are 2 typographers with a combined experience of 70 years creating and examining our own documents along with expertise in scanning, graphic arts, photography, reproduction, printing, and also including the use of the old manual typewriters along with computer created documentation while starting and owning our own successful business’ employing over 70 people. Allegedly in 1961, a typewriter produced this document on a form, but



the evidence shows us this birth certificate was created last year on a Macintosh computer, sending two copies of that form to the White House. The White house then posted a copy online and gave zerox copies to the media that the source for our exam… We have found this birth certificate to be a badly done forgery. 1. Mismatched Typed Letters Compare these typewritten letters enlarged from the birth certificate. We have marked the ones chosen with a blue dot under the original letter. Of the 15 pair’s choices, one set is from the word “Student” that exhibits two different type styles of the “t” within the same word. These support our contention that the typed letters were copied and assembled from different documents. Note the size and shape differences. These letters could not have come from the same typewriter. This is proof of forgery. 2. The Bent Cap "H” in “Hussein” … 3. The Stolen Birth Certificate Number If someone decided last year to forge a birth certificate for a person, they would need a birth certificate number that was issued in the 1961 era. A baby born the same day in Hawaii as Barack Obama … died the next day. We believe that babies number was 61 10641. The family requested her birth certificate and got the short form with a number way out of sequence. They then requested the long form and were refused. They brought a lawsuit before the Hawaiian courts. Its was denied, with the court explaining that the Honolulu Dept. of Health could decide if they wanted to provide the birth certificate of the deceased baby or not. But that is not the law in the state of Hawaii. 4. The Start of Line Error The word “Kapiolani” should be exactly under the word “Male”, not a half space indented. This is proof of forgery. Also the fact that not all the lines are flush to the left is suspicious. No other birth certificate exhibits this peculiar style. 5. Irregular Line Spacing - This birth certificate form was designed for typewriters, so that every time the typist pulled a carriage return, it would advance down exactly 2 picas to match the form line for line. This was common for all forms made for typewriters. We were unable to find another birth certificate from Hawaii with uneven line spacing like this one. Typewriters do not do this. This is proof of forgery. 6. Irregular Letter Spacing - The original locations of the two-letter combinations below are marked with a blue outline. These are just some of the combinations that vary in the space between the letters. These spaces should be equal, not different, since the old mono-spaced typewriters always moved a specific amount after each letter was typed.


We feel that the forger, assembling these letters manually on a computer could not replicate the exact spacing that the old style mechanical typewriters produced. This is proof of forgery. 7. The White Halo- The white halo, seen on the online White House release is a white outline around everything on the birth certificate. No other birth certificate has this. See it on Exhibit "A" below & Exhibit "B" showing how it should look. This was caused by the Adobe Photoshop filter used to sharpen edges. It does this by choking back the edge leaving a white halo. We show in Exhibit "C" how we did the same thing to our specimen example. The Hawaiian Dept. of Health is supposed to have put the original birth certificate on a copier and printed to a special green security paper instead of white paper. The only result possible from that is Exhibit "B", NOT exhibit "A". The halo proves that the forger combined a scan of the security paper on a computer ... flattened all of the elements in the file and then applied the Unsharp Mask. It is even on the birth certificate above ... see upper left corner. Since this is a direct copy of the birth certificate sent from Hawaii, that proves the white halo was on what they copied, so we must assume the Hawaiian original has it also. This is proof of forgery.

45. The Chain of custody of the documents from Hawaii to the White House

is frozen with use of the Halo created by the Unsharp Mask program for Adobe .

46. That Respondent public officers as if Elector Public Officers and even

when private U.S. Citizens act Publicly as the Electoral College from New York

as an extension of State Legislative prerogative only, and have a duty as to

matters of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable

or would infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to

Petitioner’s right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and

Liberty.


47. To allow a trial of the facts and issues herein is a matter of public

interest is brought by the NYS CPLR Article 78 petition filed November 14,

2012, shown as Exhibit C, that was served upon the members of the New York

State legislature’s Electoral College body by certified mail with a return receipt

request on November 14, 2012 and then by follow-up regular mail on

November 30, 2012; and that the issues were joined by the purchase of an RJI

on November 16, 2012, shown as Exhibit D-4, and the beside a letter to the

Clerk of the Court the New York state attorney general office shown as Exhibit

G-2; and

48. Thereafter, the appearance of Petitioner and Assistant Attorney General

Joshua Pepper of the Litigation Bureau before the Hon. David I. Schmidt who

for reasons explains in his order, shown as Exhibit D-5, thereafter declined to

sign the order to show cause application, and that Petitioner then requested

reconsideration on November 30, 2012 with due notice given to the Hon.

Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. for reconsideration pending see

http://www.scribd.com/doc/112747771/.

B.

The Governor of New York for a NEW U.S. Senate Election in New York to comply with the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

49. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the “A”

Issues of this Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the Court Panel with

paragraphs 1 through 48 with the same force and effect as though herein set

forth at length.



50. That Petitioner wishes an order of the Governor of New York for a NEW

U.S. Senate Election in New York to comply with the 17th Amendment to the

U.S. Constitution.

51. That Justice Schmidt in his Order declining to sign the OSC annexed to

Exhibit G sub-exhibit 5 requires both the New York Governor Andrew Cuomo,

and NYS Board of Elections to be joined as necessary parties.

52. A declaratory judgment as to the now certified U.S. Senate Election in

New York as to the 17th Amendment challenge with jurisdiction afforded the

Court by EL 16-100, in that the election held on November 6, 2012 is void ab

initio and requires a new election by order of the Governor as to elector

qualifications are not equal to that of the New York Assembly; and therefore,

Petitioner seeks to overturn New York’s U.S. Senate election with U.S. Const.

Amendment 17 :

“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. ..” (Emphasis added by Petitioner)

as the November 6, 2012 election for U.S. Senator from New York between

Democrat Candidate Kirsten Gillibrand and Republican Candidate Wendy Long

among others was conducted for electors not meeting the qualifications of a

member of the Assembly with State Constitution Article 3 Section 7:

“. No person shall serve as a member of the legislature unless he or she is a citizen of the United States and has been a resident of the state of New York for five years, and, except as hereinafter otherwise prescribed, of the assembly … district for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election; … or member of assembly at the first election next ensuing after a readjustment or alteration of the


… assembly districts becomes effective, a person, to be eligible to serve as such, must have been a resident of the county in which the senate or assembly district is contained for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election. …” (Emphasis added by Petitioner)

53. That as for Ellector Respondents Jeffries, Meng, Ortiz, Wright and

Morelle in the Petition shown in Exhibit C are prime examples of the electors

of most numerous branch of the State Legislature that before the 17th

Amendment were to elect the respective U.S. Senator of two senators from the

state of New York, as the Assembly had a margin of elector control over the

State Senate with a ratio of 3 assemblymen to 1 senator.

54. And as such Petitioner wishes the Court to void the U.S. Senate Election

and ask the Governor to set a special election, because a significant number of

the electors casting their respective vote were domiciled in New York for less

than fives years and had not lived in their respective county of domicile for at

least twelve months and there is no way to determine from the votes cast on

Novemebr 6, 2012 of those qualified what candidate was voted for.

C.

The Clerk and Speaker of the U.S. House with Majority / Minority Leaders and President of the U.S. Senate respond to the incompatibility of any

Person serving as an electoral college member while holding an office of trust or profit under the 14th Amendment United States and Constitution

Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 (A2S1C2);


through “B” Issues of this Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the

Court Panel with paragraphs 1 through 54 with the same force and effect as

though herein set forth at length.


56. That Petitioner wishes The Clerk and Speaker of the U.S. House with

Majority / Minority Leaders and President of the U.S. Senate respond to the

incompatibility of any Person serving as an electoral college member while

holding an office of trust or profit under the 14th Amendment United States and

Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 (A2S1C2) (12).

57. Petitioner has unsuccessfully expended efforts to obtained equity relief

with Temporary Restraining Order of those State and local Officer electors with

authority to act independent of the New York State electoral college who vote by

December 17, 2012, and who are incompatible with the office held, be stayed

from voting pending a trial on the facts of a forgery and permanent injunction

with a declaratory judgment as to U.S. Constitution Article 2 §1 Clause. 2 by

say January 7, 2013 now that the New York Electoral College Vote is

transmitted to Congress.

58. Petitioner needs a declaratory judgment as to the incompatibility of any

Person holding an office of trust or profit under the 14th Amendment United

States who are also electors that are to be barred from reviewing the elector

votes as present in Congress after January 2, 2013 in keeping to law mandates

59. Petitioner as to the Petition shown as Exhibit C wishes a declaratory

judgment as to the incompatibility of any Person holding an office of trust or


12 U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 2, i.e. A2S1C2 states “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.”


profit under the 14th Amendment United States who are also electors that are

to be barred from changing the eligibility of a person seeking the office of

President of the United States qualifications are in conflict with A2S1C2 and

A2S1C5 and are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to the

People of the State of New York according to the SCOTUS must be in keeping

with the exclusive power, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), of the New

York State Legislature in its plenary formation of the New York electoral college

may not change A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514

U.S. 779 (1995).

60. That an Elector as a Public US Citizen and or Public Officer has a duty

to law and facts, and that when in violation of law must be held accountable or

would infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioner’s

right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty.

61. That it is a well-settled common law rule that a public officer cannot hold

two incompatible offices simultaneously (Matter of Smith v Dillon, 267 App. Div.

39, 43 [1943]). This rule seeks to prevent offices of public trust from

accumulating in a single individual. Two offices are incompatible if one is

subordinate to the other or there is an inherent inconsistency between the two

offices (see People ex rel. Ryan v Green, 58 NY 295,304-05 [1874]; O’Malley v

Macejka, 44 NY2d 530,535 [19781; Matter of Dupras v County of Clinton, 213

AD2d 952,953 [1995]; Matter of Dykeman v Symonds, 54 AD2d 159, 162

[1976]; Fauci v Lee, 38 Misc. 2d 564,567 [1963], affd. 19 AD2d 777 [1963]).


62. Those dual office holders that have an incompatibility "has been said to

exist when there is a built-in right of the holder of one position to interfere with

that of the other . . ." (O’Malley, 44 NY2d at 535). Where one person holds both

such posts then "the design that one act as a check on the other would be

frustrated" (id.).”

63. That upon a close examination by this Court Panel of each member of

the New York State Executive branch acting also as an Elelctoral College

Elector has a conflict of interest as each possesses the authority and power to

prevent cronyism incompatibility of electors in the electoral college, but have

failed to act; and apparently act along with the Bosses who hold the public and

private U.S. Citizen enrolled party members or otherwise in distain, with the

exception of two persons listed herein, refuse to allow private U.S. Citizens to

take part in the mandates of the State Legislature delegated to the Electoral

College responsibilities,

64. The New York Executive Branch Elelctors practice cronyism that grant

political favors that are incompatable with the position of a member of the

electoral college; and that Executive Branch Electors hold an office of trust or

profit are barred from the body that has allowed lawyers, lobbyists, union

leaders, licensed professionals, party leaders and other persons holding an

office of trust or profit under the 14th Amendment United States, and includes

State and Local officers too.


D.

Congress to show cause why under the 12th, 20th, 25th amendments and U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5) Barack Hussein Obama II

should be eligible to take the oath of office of POTUS January 20, 2013;


Issue through “C” of this Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the Court

Panel with paragraphs 1 through 64 with the same force and effect as though

herein set forth at length.

66. That Petitioner wishes Congress to show cause why under the 12th, 20th,

25th amendments and U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5)

Barack Hussein Obama II should be eligible to take the oath of POTUS January

20, 2013;

E.

Congress barring the New York Electoral College votes for Barack Obama.


through “D” Issues of this Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the



68. That Petitioner wishes Congress barring the New York Electoral College

vote for Barack Obama.

F.

Congress to show cause why it should not hold the $43 Trillion Dollar theft by Barack Obama et al. since 2003 null and void under

the 14th Amendment Section 4 .



through “E” Issues in this Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the



70. That Petitioner wishes Congress to show cause why it should not hold

the $43 Trillion Dollar theft by Barack Obama et al. since 2003 null and void

available under the 14th Amendment Section 4.

U.S. Constitution 14th Amendment Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. (Emphasis by Petitioner) 71. That as further background amazing as it may seem for the Honorable

Court Panel herein, Petitioner has provided Judicial Notice of fourteen years of

Court Cases listed above that pertain herein that support a better

understanding of the above allegations and controversy here presented for

relief; and that


72. That Petitioner since October 2008 has filed three (3) State and no less

than three (3) Federal cases seeking relief from the injuries caused by the

Usurper, and each of which would have been sufficient to divert the Enterprise

Argonauts to no avail, and that one such case USDC in the DC 10-cv-00486

was filed under seal before Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth who on January 11,

2011 dismissed the case without prejudiced that since August 16, 2012 now

unsealed dismissed with prejudice and as of December 12, 2012 deemed

frivolous (see Exhibit K); and


7 3 . A s further judicial notice, on January 25, 20 12 Petitioner as a historic

bondholder of gold backed obligations ignored bv zhe People's Republic of

China (PRC) for repayment, filed a Petition t o intervene in the case Kennan v

DaX Bosw et a!. SDNY 1 1-cv-8500 that involves the 2009 theft of $1.2 Tri-jllion

of New York Federal Resesve Bank and United States denominated securities

(see: http: / /uwv.scribd.com/doc/ 79 1 1 17281); and that since, then the PBC

has nevertheless been afforded membership in the New Yosk Federal Reserve

Bank for Red Army Banking investments by the Usurper and his agents, and

alleged inter alia in the subject case the Usurper induccd retirement of U S D J

Richard J. HolweIl and replaced him with newly appointed USDJ Jessie M.

Furman, brother of the Usurper's White House Council of Economic Advisors

n ~ c m b e r Jason Furman; and

74. That Petitioner regarding the case Kennan v Dal Bosw et a!. SDYY 1 1 -

cv-8500 is directly acquainted with k o ivon Zagami, the documented

facilitator in the 2009 theft of $1 -2 Trillion of Federal Resenre md United

States denominated securities, as well as his 2008 involvement in his role in */.! 7 f i l U f d f l facilitation of the usurpation of the office of POTUS with transferred to Europe,

9) $\

Asia and Africa.; and so done in conspiracy notwithstanding any resolution of

eligibility questions posed to m y court rendering the U.S. Constitution be

damned. All of the Usurper's cohort share in the largest theft in history as

applies herein as a partial background to Petitioner's involvement starting at

page 518 of the record of t h e unsealed case 2010-cv-00486 posted at

http:l/www.scribd.com/docl11773 92921 ORIGINAL PROCEEDIYG PETITION Page 33 of 50

RELATOR-STRUNK-v-OBAMA-et-al-Quo-Warranto-Qui-Tam-Conspiracy-to-

violate-civil-rights as follows:

8. In the spring of 2008 Declarant became directly involved with the multi-month trip to the USA by Leo Lyon Zagami, a high level Rex Templars member of the Ordo Illuminatorum Universalis (OTO) related to Queen Elizabeth’s Mother and the next King Prince William, then the acting Grand Master of Propaganda Due (P2) Monte Carlo Lodge serving after the death [sic banishment]of Licio Gelli and for the Jesuits (for whom Mr. Zagami had been trained in the Vatican Library from the age of 12 years) using esoteric Freemasonry to influence fund raising for the Barack Hussein Obama Campaign to ensure the vote for their asset in November 2008. 9. Mr. Zagami’s trip was in part financed by what he refers to on the Troy Space April 30, 2008 internet broadcast as “the Russian Broadcasting Corporation”, which is the unitary enterprise (13) All-Russian State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company (Russian: Всероссийская государственная телевизионная и радиовещательная компания, Vserossiyskaya gosudarstvennaya televizionnaya i radioveshchatelnaya kompaniya, abbr. VGTRK) is a state-owned Russian television and radio company which owns several television and radio stations. It was founded in 1990 in an effort to give the president of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, and its own voice, independent of the Soviet channels.

13 2 A Unitary enterprise is a form of a business in Russia and some other post-Soviet states. Unitary enterprises are business entities that have no ownership rights to the assets they use in their operations. This form is only possible for state and municipal enterprises, which operate state or municipal property, respectively. The owners of the property of a unitary enterprise have no responsibility for its operation and vice versa. The legal status of unitary enterprises in Russia is defined in Federal Law No. 161-FZ "On State and Municipal Unitary Enterprises", which was approved by the State Duma on October 11, 2002 and signed by President Putin on November 14, 2002. The assets of unitary enterprises belong to the federal government, a Russian region, or a municipality. A unitary enterprise holds assets under economic management (for both state and municipal unitary enterprises) or operative management (for state unitary enterprises only), and such assets may not be distributed among the participants, nor otherwise divided. A unitary enterprise is independent in economic issues and obliged only to give its profits to the state. Unitary enterprises have no right to set up subsidiaries, but, with the owner's consent, can open branches and representation offices.



http://www.scribd.com/doc/101963433/DCD-RCL-2010-cv-00486-EX-RELATOR-STRUNK-v-OBAMA-et-al-Quo-Warranto-Qui-Tam-Conspiracy-to-violate-civil-rights

http://www.scribd.com/doc/101963433/DCD-RCL-2010-cv-00486-EX-RELATOR-STRUNK-v-OBAMA-et-al-Quo-Warranto-Qui-Tam-Conspiracy-to-violate-civil-rights

10. That in June 2008 Declarant has spoken with Leslie A. Lewis the Grand Master of the Prince Hall Masons Lodge 459 in the USA through a former Cistercian Nun of St. Josephs Abbey in Massachusetts who introduced me in conjunction with the work she and I were doing with Mr. Zagami; and as to the chartering of a New Masonic Lodges, in which The Prince Hall Grand Master was willing to assist and did (see Exhibit D). 11. Mr. Zagami recorded his description on Troy Space in April and June 2008 regarding his attendance at Democratic Party events in his Grand Master capacity of the P-2 Lodge, OTO and VGTRK to influence attendees of various State level Democratic Party Conventions including that of Texas in preparation for the Democratic Party convention of BHO in August of 2008. 12. That Mr. Zagami stated on the Troy Space recordings (14) as done with Declarant in telephone conversations that his USA trip was protected and operating with full support of the Central Intelligence Agency, State Department and FBI for working with the militias at a high level, in which militias have given support meeting with commanders, that contacts at such high level were working with FBI; and that there are a large group of members, about 12000 militia members, in more than that 36 militias so far. That cooperation is coming into place in that the bunch of “corporates” and families not caring for the USA… The Plan is to establish a clear link to security contractors in various states and militias and deal with the gangs and especially those with weapons who now are following the wrong path to target the real enemies. 13. In June 2008 Declarant spoke by telephone with Clinton Torrez (15)

who had provided security for Leo Lyon Zagami while in the USA and especially regarding Mr. Zagami’s security detail in the Midwest event that resulted in multiple casualties to the security staff including Mr. Torrez. 14. I spoke at length with Mr. Zagami in multiple telephone conversations including one exceeding three hours in length involving International freemasonry, the Jesuits and occult (hidden) matters involving the 2008 election.


14 3 http://leozagami.wordpress.com/category/leo-zagami-exclusive-interview-by-troy-2008-06-0507/

15 Clinton Torrez is formerly of the U.S. Army involved in securing nuclear weapons facilities and discharged with a service-connected disability. Mr. Torrez’s uncle is a

very wealthy Mexican oligarch who owns a large Marina in Mexico on the Gulf of Mexico and involved in the Iran-Contra special operations of Oliver North.


15. Mr. Zagami is involved with Fethullah GÜLEN (16) a Turkish expatriate in self- exile in Pennsylvania with an organization here in


16 The Gülen movement is a transnational civic society movement inspired by the teachings of Turkish Islamic theologian Fethullah Gülen. His teachings about hizmet (altruistic service to the "common good") have attracted a large number of supporters in Turkey and Central Asia and increasingly in other parts of the world. The Nature and participation by exact number of supporters of the Gülen movement is not known, as there is no membership system, but estimates vary from hundreds of thousands to 4 million. The movement consists primarily of students, teachers, businessman, journalists and other educated professionals, arranged in a flexible organizational network. It has founded schools, universities, an employers' association, as well as charities, real estate trusts, lobby groups, student bodies, radio and television stations, and newspapers. The schools and businesses organize locally, and link into networks on an informal rather than legal basis. After an inquiry into the effects of movement's activities in Holland, Dutch Integration Minister Eberhard Van der Laan described it as "an alliance of loosely affiliated independent institutions rather than a movement." The Economist magazine described the Gülen movement as a Turkish based movement which sounds more reasonable than most of its rivals, and which is vying to be recognized as the world's leading Muslim network. It stated that Gülen has won praise from non-Muslim quarters with his belief in science, inter-faith dialog and multi-party democracy. Nilüfer Göle, professor of sociology at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes in Paris, who is known for her studies on modernization and conservatism, has described the Gülen movement as the world's most global movement. One of the main characteristics of the movement is that it is faith-based but not faith-limited. In several countries, there are Christians, even at the community leadership level, who feel close to or inspired by the movement. In London, October, 2007 a conference examining the nature and activities of the movement was sponsored by the University of Birmingham, the Dialogue Society, the Irish School of Ecumenics, Leeds Metropolitan University, the London Middle East Institute, the Middle East Institute and the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. There was a reception at the House of Lords. Mr. Zagami explains, "Abdullah Aymaz is the second in command of the Gulen movement worldwide and probably the second most powerful person in Turkey after Fethullah Gulen. He is the European editor of Zaman, the leading newspaper in Turkey, [which is] obviously in the hands of the Gulen movement." He then states, "Abdullah Aymaz is not just a journalist, or an editor or somebody important for his political role. He is a religious leader. People respect him very much in Turkey." Leo says that on behalf of Gulen (who resides in the US) Aymaz "controls basically the prime- minister of Turkey Erdogan and the president of Turkey [Abdullah Gül] who are these so-called moderate Muslims in the hands of the Gulen movement. This is the biggest threat that modern secular Turkey had since its establishment made possible by the great freemason called Kemal Ataturk." He says that, at the time of Ataturk, the Ottoman Empire was still quite strong and that "he [Ataturk] had to get rid of all those religious fundamentalists including the family of Fatma (Leo’s wife), the Suslu family [who are Sayyids] which was part of the Ottoman Empire Establishment. So Ataturk had to fight these people in order to secularize the state. Now after almost


Brooklyn, and whose Jesuit handler of Fethullah GÜLEN is Fr. Thomas Michel S.J. who Mr. Zagami speaks of to Troy in the TroySpace internet interview recordings from April through September 2008 at length for about 100 plus hrs and manuscripts (17). 16. In one particular SKYPE transmission Declarant asked Mr. Zagami about the U.S. State Department’s journalist Christian Lovatelli Ravarino, a Member of the SMOM: [2/24/2010 2:33:22 PM] Christopher-Earl Strunk: Is Christian Lovatelli Ravarino the SMOM member who screwed you in Norway? [2/24/2010 3:40:48 PM] Leo Lyon Zagami: yep and also in Italy [2/24/2010 3:41:54 PM] Christopher-Earl Strunk: I am listening to your Late Night interview. It is very Good!! I like it. I never understood the snatch that put you in the hospital. [2/24/2010 4:03:38 PM] Leo Lyon Zagami: I hope you understand it now [2/24/2010 4:03:53 PM] Christopher-Earl Strunk: Yes [2/24/2010 4:03:59 PM] Leo Lyon Zagami: is quite clear in the last episode of the Night Watch


a hundred years they have managed to regain power. The situation in Turkey is still under control because obviously the Military are still in control of people who know the danger of religious fanatics who hide themselves in the disguise of moderate Islam." Leo goes on to explain that the people of the Gulen movement, under the guise of interreligious dialogue, are in close but secret collaboration with the Vatican and the Jesuits. It is known that Abdullah Aymaz together with Fethullah Gulen was received by Pope John Paul II in 1998. The secret plan is for the Muslim system to stealthily substitute the faltering Roman Catholic Christian system as a means to keep subdued the people and maintain control over its lower level leadership. Leo states that "forty Cardinals have already secretly converted to Islam and have submitted to Fethullah Gulen." Gulen is the present head of the Illuminati Chain of Forty of Islam (also called the "Golden Chain"), "a chain that goes on since the time of Prophet Mohammed." A secret organization secretly in charge of people in the metaphysical realm and the geopolitical establishment.

Leo explains that the planned secret takeover of the Roman Catholic power structure by the Muslim Illuminati, headed by the Gulen Movement while working hand-in-glove with the Jesuits will only apply to people in positions of power who are to secretly convert to Islam while outwardly still professing traditional Christian creeds. The masses of people will be allowed to carry on professing their traditional religious creeds all the while being impervious to the notion that their leaders are really crypto-Muslims doing the bidding of the all powerful Islamic-Jesuitical hierarchy. 17 http://leozagami.wordpress.com/


[2/24/2010 4:04:28 PM] Christopher-Earl Strunk: You know I am fighting the State Department and CIA in my court suits in Washington now. [2/24/2010 4:06:00 PM] Christopher-Earl Strunk: I am rushing out to mail some court papers maybe we may speak on SKYPE sometime? [2/24/2010 4:10:33 PM] Leo Lyon Zagami: k 17. That the Court at this point must admit that Declarant has a unique view and experience in regards to the role of the Jesuits in the present chain of events ongoing in the world today, and that the history of the Jesuit Order’s ongoing and unbroken mission as militia to the Pope is to totally and forever eliminate remnants of the Protestant reformation to reinstall the Pope as the single infallible world absolute monarch over all matters spiritual and temporal bar none and are actively set to eliminate the USA that claims to have national sovereignty or alliance as a self-subsisting singularity, similarly as with any sect, tribe or movement like the Shiite, Tibetans, Jews who believe in the coming of a single absolute monarch or messiah other than the Pope pose a threat to be suppressed. 18. That the history, hidden knowledge and occult matters of the Society of Jesus is a matter of national security for survival of the individual against the Jesuits’ communist collective here in New York and the several States and involvement in the FCA matter. 19. That in the context of what follows in regards to understanding As such Declarant asked Eric Jon Phelps to make the attached Affidavit regarding the Power of the Society of Jesus in Russia From Czar Alexander I to the Present to summarize the Jesuits’ manufacture of the USSR / Third Rome and Cold War now being revisited to destroy the USA today (see Exhibit E). 20. In the context of what is stated below in regards to Zbigniew Brzezinski and the campaign fund raising for BHO, the hoax of the Cold War is being replayed now with the BHO presidency, I subscribe to what Mr. Phelps states at paragraph 44 of Exhibit E: “That during the Cold War Hoax, Moscow served as a training base for the Jesuit Order’s world revolutionary socialist communists, including Fidel Castro, Michael (“Martin Luther”) King, Yasser Arafat, Jesuit-trained Bill Clinton and indeed, president-elect Barry Davis Obama;” 21. Declarant also contends based upon my conversations with my friend Robert K. Dornan the list includes the KGB handling of John McCain while a prisoner of War in Hanoi, when He was sent inside the Soviet Union for medical treatment and programming is a KGB asset.


22. That Zbigniew Brzezinski is both a blood member of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM) on "the right" and of the Scottish Rite Freemason Grand Lodge of Philadelphia on "the left" working for the Jesuits against the sovereign interest of the USA; Mr. Brzezinski world outlook and agenda for the Jesuits that eclipses all other influences upon BHO. 23. In the context of the cooperation between the KGB/FSB, CIA, MI-6 and the Jesuits, Declarant in May 2010 attended the Obama / Columbia University Trial sponsored by Pastor James Manning’s Church in Harlem, and became more familiar with how Zbigniew Brzezinski used Columbia University as a cover while BHO was deployed from 1981 through 1983 to Pakistan and Afghanistan for the CIA accompanied by three CIA operatives. 24. While there in Pakistan and Afghanistan it is clear that as Zbigniew Brzezinski and his agents included both Tim Osman (a.k.a. Osama Bin Laden) and Muslim BHO who were all in contact with the KGB agents in the context of the Northern Alliance in relation to the Caspian Sea Oil pipeline development and other global intrigue. 25. That Zbigniew Brzezinski intentionally in February 1979 brought the Ayatollah Khomeini (Williamson) to power in Iran, in July 1979 entered into operations in Afghanistan prompting the Soviet invasion in October and is responsible for the deaths of 241 in Beirut Lebanon in 1983, now brings Islam to America through the Freemason Muslim BHO where here in Manhattan a 13 story mosque to be built at the site of the 9-11 World Trade Center by the sanctuary city mayor / usurper Michael Bloomberg. 26. Like Mr. Bloomberg, SMOM member Rudolf Giuliani worked with the Soviet / KGB / FSB mafia here in New York City that in one generation since leaving the Soviet Union jumped the line when Mr. Giuliani received a phone call after John Gotti went on TV and boasted he was “the Teflon Don” closed him down and gave the KGB full reign here to impose payback for Zbigniew Brzezinski’s 1979 flanking operations. 27. That Declarant’s contention is that Russia, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Lebanon, Nigeria, Libya, Egypt, Dubai among other sovereign foreign entities and persons have illegally contributed to the campaign of BHO that spent $738,812,857 to get into the White House and 46% of the total money raised for all candidates in the 2008 Presidential Election that compares to three hundred and ten million spend by John McCain; and that the Vatican Bank was used as an intermediary for transfer of funds into its USA landing Banks that with the release of the banking records of the BHO campaign committee will show substantial illegal foreign involvement to buy the presidency as previously in the instance of James Riady of the Indonesian Lippo Group for Bill Clinton in 1992 was not convicted by the DOJ until January 11, 2001.


75. As further judicial notice, in light of Petitioners discovery of the

laundering activities of JP Morgan Bank as the landing bank for the Vatican

Bank (18)(now as of last spring assumed by Wells Fargo Bank), in February

2012 Petitioner called to warn Jerome Corsi in regards to an article he

published in World Net Daily (WND) reporting money laundering activities of

the New York Branch of the Hong Kong Shanghi Bank Corporation (HSBC) in

which he exposed evidence (see Exhibit L); and in which a short time later he

was injured when HSBC lodged a complaint that blocked Internet access to one

of the WND stories, and as a senior reporter Jerome Corsi was fired by the New

York City investment firm he had worked with for two years as a senior

18 There are three direct Vatican Banking mechanisms used to channel

money into the United States: (i) The Vatican Bank number UID# 014780 BIC/SWIFT : IOPRVAVX a.k.a

ISTITUTO PER LE OPERE DI RELIGIONE of VATICAN CITY in the VATICAN CITY STATE and for which there are seven (7) banking participants as the landing banks for international wire transfers into the USA and who directly benefited by putting Obama into office: 0001 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; 0002 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; 0008 CITIBANK, N.A.; 0103 DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST CO AMERICAS; 0108 HSBC BANK USA; 0256 STANDARD CHARTERED BANK; 0509 WELLS FARGO NY INTL FKA WACHOVIA; needless to say the Vatican Bank and the participating banks are generally owned by the Vatican through the Rothschild who have managed the Vatican asset since 1824 and keep that control tightly within the family circle even as far back as Alexander Hamilton who having married a Rothschild cousin setup the Bank of New York in 1784 that only after great effort became chartered after 1791 when he became the US Treasurer; and

(ii) further, the International Catholic Union of the Press (UCIP) is used for the World Forum of Professionals and Institutions in Secular and Religious Media with the Address: UCIP, CP 197, 1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland and the Vatican name of the account holder: UCIP with the name of the Bank: IOR, Vatican Swiftcode: IOPRVAVX Account number in Europe: 16586001 http://www.ucip.ch/une/ib.htm and in which the Vatican Interbank clearing account in the US is with JPM CHASE MANHATTAN BANK NEW YORK Account no.: 001-1-97500; and

(iii) further yet, The Vatican Bank: ISTITUTO PER LE OPERE DI RELIGIONE = INSTITUTE FOR THE RELIGION WORKS in which the Institute for Works of Religion (Italian: Istituto per le Opere di Religione - IOR) commonly known as Vatican Bank was formed during World War 2 and is located inside the Vatican City.



http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/big-bank-retaliates-against-wnd-for-expose/

http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/big-bank-retaliates-against-wnd-for-expose/

http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/next-shoe-drops-in-bank-scandal-on-wnd

http://www.ucip.ch/une/ib.htm

managing director, Gilford Securities. (http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/calls-

from-3-continents-to-criminally-prosecute-hsbc/#3dEjWszI1PQsEvHj.99); and

76. Thereafter, In June, WND reported evidence Eric Holder’s Justice

Department has not investigated money-laundering charges in deference to

bank clients of his Washington-based law firm, where Holder was a partner

prior to joining the Obama administration; and then WND reported in October

HSBC was engaged in a systematic scheme to defraud citizens of India who live

abroad out of billion of dollars in investment accounts, according to an Indian

source who provided evidence. (http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/calls-from-3-

continents-to-criminally-prosecute-hsbc/#3dEjWszI1PQsEvHj.99 ); and despite

a civil conviction for money laundering secured by US Attorney Loretta Lynch

of $1.92 Billion in civil fines, the Justice department under Eric Holder has

blocked criminal indictments (see Exhibit M).

77. That Petitioner warned on January 23, 2009 shown as Exhibit A of

further civil action, Petitioner’s standing herein is established by his private

U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary status for accounts that are deliberately

wasting under the Usurper’s control with his agents Eric Holder of the U.S.

Department of Justice. Hillary Clinton of the U.S. State Department among

others especially Timothy Franz Geithner of the U.S. Treasury as a key player

of a racketeering enterprise, had previously assumed his position as the ninth

president and chief executive officer of the New York Federal Reserve Bank on

November 17th, 2003, also served as the vice chairman and permanent

member of the Federal Open Market Committee, the group responsible for


http://www.gilfordsecurities.com/

http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/calls-from-3-continents-to-criminally-prosecute-hsbc/#3dEjWszI1PQsEvHj.99


http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/holder-prosecutes-mom-and-pop-fat-cats-walk/

http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/another-fraud-charge-against-global-banking-giant



formulating the nation's monetary policy and determining the national interest

rate and using his position from 2003 through the present facilitated the

ongoing theft and money laundering of $43 Trillions of U.S. taxpayer dollars

unauthorized by Congress with impunity according to the RICO Statement of

the class action / civil RICO case 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML in EDNY now before

Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein USDJ and his Magistrate Levy (see

http://www.kcandassociates.org/pdfs/111307429-Spire-Law-Federal-

Complaint-in-New-York.pdf ), in re that complaint see the Press Release see

Exhibit N; and that

78. What is remarkable is that Jack B. Weinstein upon assignment

immediately recused himself because he has investments with several of the

Defendant financial institutions, leaving pre-calendar phase matters in the

hands of Magistrate Levy; and that I want to have this Court know that based

upon my several personal conversations in the last 12 years I have had with

Jack B. Weinstein over the years in EDNY when our paths crossed in the

hallway, Judge Weinstein was never stuck-up, has always been friendly to me

and initiates greetings - I have always considered Judge Weinstein an honest

Judge, even though a big government Progressive – but then so was my father

too, both are generous and thorough.

79. And were the Court to thoroughly review the incompatbility of Mr.

DiNaopli as the Controller / Elector of the State of New York Pension fund

system, who has sole signature power with fidicuary trust over the State

pension funds and investment, he along with other Executives and Secretary of


http://www.kcandassociates.org/pdfs/111307429-Spire-Law-Federal-Complaint-in-New-York.pdf


State Perales, have power to investigate a felony for which each will be held

liable as accessory after the fact; all refuse to respond to Petitioner’s concerns

in light of the civil RICO case 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML in EDNY now before

Judge Jack B. Weinstein USDJ as to the ongoing theft and money laundering

of $43 Trillions US taxpayer dollars unauthorized by Congress (see

http://www.kcandassociates.org/pdfs/111307429-Spire-Law-Federal-

Complaint-in-New-York.pdf ); and

80. That based upon Petitioner’s understanding and knowledge of the

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and that GAAP follows an

accounting convention that lies at the heart of the double-entry bookkeeping

system called Matching Principle. This principle works as follows:

• When a bank accepts bullion, coin, currency, checks, drafts, promissory

notes, or any other similar instruments (hereinafter "instruments") from

customers and deposits or records the instrument as assets, it must record

offsetting liabilities that match the assets that it accepted from customers

like the New York Pension Funds or United States Executive controlled

Pension funds.

• The liabilities represent the amounts that the bank owes the customers,

funds accepted from customers. In a fractional reserve banking system like

the United States banking system, most of the funds advanced to borrowers

(assets of the banks) are created by the banks themselves and are not

merely transferred from one set of depositors to another set of borrowers;

and




81. As such in our New York system oversight of securities under the “Blue

Sky Law” and shell companies registered in New York as done in association

with the rules devised by then HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo who while NYS

AG now involve his incompatibility with his present support of the Obama

Administration with the other Executives use of the Federal Reserve Bank of

New York with transaction that involve money of exchange not credit involving

money of account that means that lawful money was and is or probably would

be disbursed by either side in a covered transaction that in short involves

Union and New York Pension Funds as part of the $43 Trillion dollar mix, just

as Mr. McCall invested funds in ENRON; however, Petitioner is barred petition!

82. That Petitioner beyond the involvement of Eric Holder in the “Fast and

Furious Project” gun running for which he still has not responded just like the

Executive has refused to testify on the Benghazi attack, re-examining the

events surrounding the January 8, 2011 shooting of Federal Judge John Roll

killed during a shooting in Arizona that also involved an attack on U.S. Rep.

Gabrielle Giffords. and U.S. Marshal for Arizona, appears more as a warning to

Federal Judges from acting against the Executive actions involving the Theft of

$43 Trillion US Taxpayer Dollars, and that according to a January 11, 2011

article by PAUL MILLER entitled “PERSPECTIVE ABOUT THE SHOOTING IN

TUCSON ON SATURDAY WHICH IS OFF ALL RADAR AND WORTH LOOKING

INTO …ONE … DID”, (19) Miller states:

… Obama recently signed an executive order allowing the feds to confiscate


19 http://authenticallywired.com/2011/01/11/federal-judge-john-roll/ http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2010/10/14/proposed-government-401k-grab/


http://authenticallywired.com/2011/01/11/federal-judge-john-roll/

http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2010/10/14/proposed-government-401k-grab/

all 401ks and retirement accounts. Our media forget to inform us of this fact. A single judge adjudicated that Obama did not have that authority and stopped the confiscation. Federal Judge John Roll … The judge, USDC court of Arizona Presiding Judge Roll, was shot and died on Saturday by a “crazed gunman.” The historical connotations are similar to Kennedy/Oswald in several ways. If I had a 401k and/or a retirement account I would convert such to an investment in a tangible asset made of metal. Either you get rid of it, or Obama will get rid of it for you. Either way I do not believe retirement accounts will exist in the near future. TWO … DID … I’d like to know why another question isn’t being asked re the Tucson massacre. Federal Judge John Roll –for Arizona–was killed. And yet he’s only mentioned anywhere as just another victim. Here’s the question: Why is there possibly no connection being made that about 72 hours before he was killed, on Friday, he issued a critical “preliminary ruling” against the Obama administration to prevent them from acting on an FDR Executive Order (6102), which allowed the government to seize personal savings when no proof of a crime was committed? (“USA v. $333,520.00 in US Currency et al”, Case number: 4:2010cv00703 Filed Nov 30, 2010). My first question was: Who was the actual target, Giffords or Roll? or both (conveniently at the same place)? While the possibility that Loughner was under mind control has been disparaged in the press, the knowledge of the existence of such a program, and known past CIA/FBI involvement in such incidents, why would there not be the possible question of a connection?


83. That Usurper has signed 146 Executive Orders to date during the

Usurper’s Administration is to be compared as about the same as with other

prior executives effecting pension funds. The Official Executive Orders as they

become available in the Federal Registry and are listed starting on January 25

2009 up to date as of December 21, 2012 as published on

http://1461days.blogspot.com/2009/01/current-list-of-president-


http://1461days.blogspot.com/2009/01/current-list-of-president-obamas.html#.UNtjg6D6rRQ

obamas.html#.UNtjg6D6rRQ (see Exhibit O); and

84. That inter alia Petitioner is alleging that there is sufficient evidence to

suspect that the Usurper has invaded a pension & retirement fund for

operating capital, bypassing Congress by executive order or otherwise, to gain

access to $43,000,000,000,000; and that as Congress, the Federal Courts,

absolutely have an interest to fulfill the requirements of protection of Public

and Private U.S. Citizens required under the 14th Amendment Section 4 of the

U.S. Constitution when there is sufficient evidence of resurrection, as herein

exists, against the US Constitution and People of the United States– most

certainly both the Congress and Courts are silent as to the Usurper’s records

and lack of proof of birth that would otherwise for any government employee

shall be provided wasn’t herein;

85. Petitioner also contends in regards to the mandatory requirements for

any government official / employee and or contractor is to provide copious

proof of all kinds that was not used to also vet the present Usurper in the

Office of POTUS; and that as evidence of the most stringent requirements for

vetting Intelligence Expert testimony by Pamela Barnett that Unvetted Obama

Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background Check was offered at

trial as shown in Exhibit G – 11; and

86. That the Usurper under any standard practice or hiring circumstance in

either State or Federal employment would absolutely not obtain a job!!.

87. That if the above were not enough to consider, reflect on what is

transpiring in regards to the United Nations Small Arms Ban Treaty signed by



the Usurper and pending an adoption vote of the U.S. Senate:

Peter Lanza AND Robert Holmes both to testify Libor scandal. - The father of Newtown Connecticut school shooter Adam Lanza is Peter Lanza who is a VP and Tax Director at GE Financial. The father of Aurora Colorado movie theater shooter James Holmes is Robert Holmes, the lead scientist for the credit score company FICO. Both men were to testify before the US Senate in the ongoing LIBOR scandal. The London Interbank Offered Rate, known as Libor, is the average interest rate at which banks can borrow from each other. 16 international banks have been implicated in this ongoing scandal, accused of rigging contracts worth trillions of dollars. HSBC has already been fined $1.9 billion and three of their low level traders arrested.

http://newsworldwide.wordpress.com/2012/...r-scandal/ and

88. Petitioner further was amazed to discover last year that in regards to his

study of the CIA Operation Gladio and P-2 Monte Carlo Lodge involvement in

that mess, the interim grandmaster of P-2 (Leo Lyon Zagami) had met and

corresponded with Breivek in re : OSLO, Norway (AP) — A Norwegian court

sentenced Anders Behring Breivik to prison on Friday, denying prosecutors the

insanity ruling they hoped would show that his massacre of 77 people was the

work of a madman, not part of an anti-Muslim crusade. Read more:

http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/24/norway-shooter-anders-breivik-

sentenced-to-10-21-years/#ixzz2G6Re4T54

89. Petitioner contends that according to the RICO Statement of the class

action / civil RICO case 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML in EDNY and as documented

by the Levy Institute that Congress has not authorized the present use of the

$43 Trillion Dollars stolen for private use starting in 2003 from the New York

Federal Reserve Bank without the knowledge of the Congress and or then Bush

Executive reducing the use and surety status of the Public / Private US Citizen

Taxpayers to that of a moral obligation surety bond without their knowledge,


http://newsworldwide.wordpress.com/2012/...r-scandal/

http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/24/norway-shooter-anders-breivik-sentenced-to-10-21-years/#ixzz2G6Re4T54

http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/24/norway-shooter-anders-breivik-sentenced-to-10-21-years/#ixzz2G6Re4T54

and thereby improperly binding Petitioner as a Private US Citizen secured

beneficiary back into a surety debtor status while wasting his secured

beneficiary Usufruct organization (shown in Exhibit B) accounts under the very

same executive that has conducted the theft.

SUMMARY IN SUPPORT OF EQUITY RELIEF FOR

A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OF RESPONDENTS

That since 2008 much has transpired as a result of the cowardice and or

corruption of judges and government officials, and all who refuse to enforce the

minimum standard of law under the United States Constitution Article 2

Section 1 Clause 5 mandate that every person seeking the office of POTUS shall

be a “natural-born Citizen”. Why this is so? I believe it best explained above, as

a well planned unfolding of a more than thirty year UIFA effort to transform

individual ownership of real property under local State sub-division jurisdiction

into instruments for conversion at a distance without judicial due process and

equal protection, and with the intent that the fractional banking system would

be strengthen by adding real property into the mix beyond the projected

lifetime earnings of a Public U.S. Citizen who remains subservient with the

surety to the State trustee of the Usufruct construct owner by the 1868 ratified

14th Amendment to conform to the authority of the United States of America

forward; and as with Petitioner, any Public US Citizen may reclaim his/her

Private US Citizen freedom and liberty guarantee status- known before the

first World War in teaching trust law. This Court has an opportunity herein.


jaqaJ yaas 01 u~ruo~ Jaylo ou ~LT wey alqe~da~~! Juauyruury y3lm "3~"ssa

That Affirmant has read the above and I know its contents as an expert witness; the

facts stated in the Petition are true to my own personal knowledge, except as to the

matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those

matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated

upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd parties, books and records, and

personal knowledge, except as to those stated upon information and belief, which I

believe to be true.

Christopher -Earl: Strunk O in esse

Sworn to before me this the &%ay of December 2012

- _ _- - - - - - - - - : * ~ T A R ~ PUBLIC - - .- - - # _ _ - .- - . _ - . MARK FURMAN - - . -. -LNQTARYPUBLiC-STATE OF NEW VOK;.

- . - . -. - . . . x - - - NO> 01 ~ ~ 6 2 1 2 3 2 0

- . , . Qualified in Kings County My ~ommlsslon Expires October 13. 201 2

http://www.scribd.com/doc/l17739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 50 of 50

AFFIDAVIT

In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured

beneficiary

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Exhibit A

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit B

Revised Article 9 UCC Search

UCC Search Results

File amendment to this UCC Return to search form

File number: 2012-2614943-04Filing date: 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PMLapse date: 12/12/2017 4:57:28 PMStatus: A - Active

ACTIONS

Action File Date StatusInitial financing Statement 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM Active - Filed online

NAMES

Debtor/Secured Party/Filer Date Added AddressDebtorCHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNKOrgID: 03766Type: BUSINESS TRUSTJurisdiction: NEW YORK

12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281Brooklyn NY 11238

Secured PartyChristopher Earl Strunk 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281

Brooklyn NY 11238FilerChristopher Earl Strunk 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281

Brooklyn NY 11238

COLLATERAL DESCRIPTION

Date Filed Collateral Description

12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM

THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE ENTERED INTO THE COMMERCIALREGISTRY ACCEPTED FOR VALUE EXEMPT FROM LEVY -- ALLPROPERTY OF DEBTOR INCLUDING ORGANIZATION NAME,“CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK”.

IMAGES

Document Type PDF Tiff Image File Date PagesUCC Filing - Initial financingStatement PDF 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM 1

https://app.sos.ky.gov/ftucc/(S(hxaufn55brzmmv450mfxdl45))/search.aspx

1 of 1 12/12/2012 5:09 PM

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit C

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS

aristopher-Earl : Strunk in esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 1 1238 Index NO.: 1 LTL~%\\Z

?

Petitioner, - Petitioner designate

-against- The County of Kings as the Place of trial.

Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 The basis of venue is the Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Petitioner's place to vote Bill DeBlasio of 442 1 lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue --New York, NY 10037 . Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A --New York, NY 10001 William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street --New York, NY 10027 Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023 Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street --New York, NY I0014 Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 1 1 103 Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710 Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road --Albany, NY 12208 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 ,

Scott Adams of 1 1 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 ,

Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849; and Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Ofice 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510

Respondent@). NOTICE OF PETITION

To the above-named Respondent(s):

YOU ARE HEREBY PETITIONED to answer the petition in this action and to serve a

copy of your answer, or, if the petition is not served with this notice, to serve a notice of

appearance, on the Petitioner within 20 days after the service of this Notice, exclusive of the day

of service; and in case of your failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by

default for the relief demanded in the petition.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York November 0 , 2 0 1 2

Christopher-Earl: Strunk, in esse, Petitioner self-represent without being an attorney 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281, Brooklyn, New York 11238. (845) 901-6767 E-mail: chris@,strunk.ws

To: Respondents as follows:

Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 1 1232 Bill DeBlasio of 442 1 1 th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 1 121 5 Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037 Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001 William Thompson of 106 West 12 1 st Street -- New York, NY 10027 Scott Stringer of 1 55 West 7 1 st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023 Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014 Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 1 1 103 Archie Spigner of 1 121 0 1 75th Street -- Jamaica, NY 1 1433 George Gresham 13 13 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 1071 0 Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 Gerald D. Jennings of 1 135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 Scott Adams of 1 1 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 1 1704 Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849; and Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 2051 0

Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS .......................................................................

IndexNo.: 2 L q 48 /20 12 X

Christo her-Earl : Strunk in esse 593 VanSerbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 11238

Petitioner, VEFUFIED PETITION -against-

Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Grace Meng of 147 14 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11 354 FOR EQUITY RELIEF BY Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Bill DeBlasio of 442 I lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 1121 4 WRIT OF PROHIBITION WITH Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue --New York, NY 10037 TRO STAY, INJUNCTION AND Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A --New York, NY 10001 William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023 Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street --New York, NY 10014 AS TO ELECTORAL COLLEGE Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11 103 Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 PUBLIC OFFICERS WITH U.S. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 CONSTITUTION ART. 2 $1 C1.2 Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 1071 0 Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 AND VOID US SENATE ELECTION Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road --Albany, NY 12208 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 1461 0 Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 Scott Adams of 1 1 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 - Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849; and Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 205 10

Respondents.

Petitioner, Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse, a non-surety private natural-born U.S. Citizen self

represented without an attorney, as and for his Petition for a writ of prohibition with Temporary Restraining

Order (TRO) and permanent injunction with a declaratory judgment as to U.S. Constitution Article 2 $1

Clause 2 (A2S 1 C2) exclusive power of the State legislature formation of the New York electoral college that

under CPLR Article 78, the New York State Election Law Article $16-100 jurisdiction over Election Law

Article 12 and related law as applies to twenty-nine (29) U.S. Citizens to serve as Public Officer members of

the New York Electoral College afier the November 6,2012 General Election thru December 25,2012; and

Christopher-Earl: Strunk's PETITION Page 1 of 20


that this Petition requests expedited emergency equity relief with a CPLR §7805 injunction with a stay of

New York Electoral College vote due by December 15, 2012 until the Court renders a declaratory judgment

on the issues of law under CPLR §7806 regarding U.S. Constitution: Article 2 in its entirety, especially

Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 3 (A2S1C3) as amended by the Article 7 Amendments the 12th , the 14th

especially sections 3 and 4, the 20th, and the 25th ; further, especially as to the U.S. Constitution Article 2

Section 1 paragraph 5 (A2S1C5) term of art “natural born Citizen” (NBC) natural law issue versus the idiom

“born a citizen” positive law created by the New York State Board of Elections (NYS BOE); further, the

U.S. Constitution: Article 3 Section 3; Article 4; Article 6; and furthermore, related New York State law and

regulations as applies to the public officer oath, duties and obligation as applies with use of NYS Civil

Service Law §105, and that Petitioner seeks equity relief on six (6) issues of Law with Facts pertaining to the

misapplication and misadministration of Public Officer acts as relate to the December 5, 2008 Order and

Decision as a matter of State Law heard by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. at I.A.S. Part 1 in the

Article 78 Petition with Kings County Index No.: 2008-29641, and Complaint with Index No.: 2008 29642;

and also, Petitioner challenges the New York U.S. Senate Election as void ab initio with U.S. Constitution

Amendment 17 and NYS Constitution Article 3 §7 grounds; and that based upon information and belief and

at all times hereinafter mentioned, with imminent irreparable harm as time is of the essence and without

another forum for relief, alleges of captioned Respondents and related persons as follows:

1. Petitioner Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse, is a duly registered voter of the 64th Election District

of the 57th Assembly District (AD) and within the New York 8th U.S. House District at 593 Vanderbilt

Avenue – 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 for ten years with email: [email protected] and cell phone 845-901-

6767, and an enrolled member of the Republican Party who participated at the November 6, 2012 General

Election there voted entirely for the Republican Party line of candidates with Wendy Long for US Senate.

2. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner duly served his COMPLAINT OF ATTEMPT TO COMMIT A

CRIME BY A PUBLIC OFFICER WITH NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST AN INJUNCTION IN

KINGS COUNTY WITH DECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS (hereinafter the “COMPLAINT”)

upon the respective County District Attorney (DA) with jurisdiction over the domicile of residence of the

Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 2 of 20



respective Public Officer member of the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College for a

total of 29 members variously domiciled in Fourteen (14) Counties that are now duly elected without

challenge on November 6, 2012, pending the NYS BOE final tally / canvassing by the end of November, all

serve as public officer electors to cast their votes by December 15, 2012 and that then will be transmitted to

the U.S. Senate President Joseph Biden in a joint seating of the new Congress on January 3, 2013 take their

oath of office in the new Congress that there will select the next President / vice President of the United

States (POTUS) according to the 12th and 20th Amendments of A2S1C3.

3. That the criminal COMPLAINT affirms of each Public Officer in each domicile therein quote:

• [each] Elector as part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6, 2012 General Election for choosing New York’s candidate for the office of President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15, 2012; and that such Public Officers are to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college intending to vote for Barack Obama as if mandated by the State of New York legislature with exclusive power afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer including office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).

• That in addition to the foregoing, Affirmant based upon information and belief contends that Barack

Obama is guilty of forgery, spoliation, concealment intimidation of witnesses and racketeering in the matter of his alleged Common Law citizen status as if a Native-born Citizen notwithstanding the allegiance status of his parents rather than a Natural Law Natural-born Citizen born on soil to married US citizen parents, nevertheless is a British Subject with dual allegiance at birth wherever that was to the minor US Citizen mother in wedlock to a majority aged British subject foreign alien student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother’s custody during her 2

nd marriage Barack Obama was adopted in Indonesia by his Indonesian Citizen step-

father, Lolo Soetoro, who gave the name “SOEBARKAH” according to the U.S. State Department record affirmed on the August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and thereafter as an Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Barry Soetoro) reentered the USA in 1971 alone without a US Passport to live with his grandmother who obtained foreign student funding, illegally obtained a stolen Social Security Number no later than 1980, forged a Selective Service filing dated 1980, and inter alia in furtherance of usurpation of the office of POTUS no later than April 25, 2011, according to more than three experts, forged a Long Form Certificate of Birth as if of Hawaii.

• That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack

Obama has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GÜLEN Movement and Iran against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through Morocco, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason; and that any candidate elector and or public officer including … who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition and treason.



• Based upon the foregoing subject there is a preponderance of evidence proving that the April 25, 2011 forged public document is for the purpose of usurping the POTUS, and that were any New York State Public Officer Electors to cast a vote aiding abetting each crime the civil servant would be an accessory after the fact to a felony under New York Penal Law; and as such Affirmant provides due notice hereby as a matter of standing guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through §2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law § 16-100, N.Y.S. CPLR § 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law § 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3

rd parties, books and records, and personal knowledge. “

4. That the respective County DA with jurisdiction over crimes of electors in each of fourteen counties

are: P. David Soares Albany District Attorney; Robert T. Johnson The Bronx District Attorney; Frank A.

Sedita, III Erie District Attorney; Charles J. Hynes District Attorney of Kings; Sandra Doorley District

Attorney of Monroe; Kathleen M. Rice District Attorney of Nassau; Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District Attorney of

New York; William J. Fitzpatrick District Attorney of Onondaga; Francis D. Phillips District Attorney of

Orange; Richard A. Brown District Attorney of Queens; Thomas J. Spota District Attorney of Suffolk; Gwen

Wilkinson District Attorney of Tompkins; Kevin C. Kortright District Attorney of Washington; Janet

DiFiore District Attorney of Westchester; and act independently of this civil action.

5. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner duly served a NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ARTICLE 78

PETITION WITH AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

PENDING A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS (hereinafter known as

the “NOTICE”) upon the respective County District Attorney with jurisdiction over the domicile of

residence of the respective Public Officer member of the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle

Electoral College of 29 members in Fourteen (14) Counties got Notice that stated quote:

“Please take notice of Petitioner’s intent to file an order to show cause application at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 11 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on Monday November 19, 2012 for a preliminary injunction relief pending a declaratory judgment on issues of law; e.g., Are public officers to be held liable as accessories to felonies in usurpation of Office of POTUS and Ballot access? Are public officers presented with the facts of Barack Obama ineligibility able to change qualifications before the Electoral College Vote scheduled December 15, 2012?”



6. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner had a person not a party to this suit serve a copy of the

COMPLAINT and NOTICE upon the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College

Members for a total of 29 members in Fourteen (14) Counties individually as follows:

1. Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 2. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 3. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 4. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 5. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 6. Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 7. Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 8. Bill DeBlasio of 442 11th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 9. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 10. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 11. Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 12. Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025 13. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 14. Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York, NY 10002 15. Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037 16. Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001 17. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 18. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023 19. Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014 20. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 21. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 22. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 23. Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103 24. Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 25. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 26. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 27. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 28. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849 29. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710

7. That Petitioner has been barred from filing any further suit without leave by the Order of Arthur M.

Schack J.S.C. in the fraud complaint Strunk v NYS BOE et al Index No.: 2011-6500 under penalty of

contempt against Public Officers:

• Andrew M. Cuomo of 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 • Tom DiNapoli of 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 • Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025 • Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York, NY 10002

; and therefore, such named Public officers are not included herein unless by leave to do so.



AS AND FOR THE FIRST QUESTION THE NEW YORK ELECTION OF KIRSTEN

GILLIBRAND TO US SENATE IS VOID AB INITIO AS THE ELECTOR

QUALIFICATIONS ARE NOT EQUAL TO THAT OF THE NEW YORK ASSEMBLY 8. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 7

with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that as and for the first question

the New York election held November 6, 2012 of Kirsten Gillibrand to the U.S. Senate from New

York is void ab initio as to elector qualifications are not equal to that of the New York Assembly .

9. Petitioner seeks to overturn New York’s U.S. Senate election with U.S. Const. Amendment 17

“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. ..”

as the November 6, 2012 election for U.S. Senator from New York between Democrat Candidate

Kirsten Gillibrand and Republican Candidate Wendy Long was conducted for electors not meeting

the qualifications of a member of the Assembly with State Constitution Article 3 Section 7:

“. No person shall serve as a member of the legislature unless he or she is a citizen of the United States and has been a resident of the state of New York for five years, and, except as hereinafter otherwise prescribed, of the assembly … district for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election; … or member of assembly at the first election next ensuing after a readjustment or alteration of the … assembly districts becomes effective, a person, to be eligible to serve as such, must have been a resident of the county in which the senate or assembly district is contained for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election. …” (Emphasis added by Petitioner)

10. In addition to the above listed State Officers, Petitioner has also been barred from filing any further

suit without leave by the Order of Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. in the fraud complaint Strunk v NYSBOE et al

Index No.: 2011-6500 under penalty of contempt against other Public Officers and State entities:

• The New York State Board of Ellection and its agents • The New York Secretary of State • City of New York among many other persons;

as such named Public officers and agencies are not included herein unless by leave to do so, Petitioner

wishes the Court to void the U.S. Senate Election and ask the Governor set a special election, because a

significant number of the electors casting their respective vote were domiciled in New York for less than



fives years and had not lived in their respective county of domicile for at least twelve months and there is no

way to determine from the votes cast on Novemebr 6, 2012 of those qualified what candidate was voted for.

11. That Petitioner’s right to suffrage, a republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; are and

would be infringed were the election of US Senator not held void ab initio and that a new special election

held; and therefore, public officers yet name along with Respondent Kirsten Gillibrand of 15 West 26th

Street, Suite 4R, New York, NY 10010 with her present place of business at Washington, DC Office

478 Russell Washington, DC 20510, as a public officer has infringed my rights and acted contrary to the law

of the land with those yet named as each Respondent must either be sanctioned and barred from office and a

new special elelction arranged for qualified elelctors as soon as possible.

12. In addition to the US Senate Election, regarding the POTUS Election there are five (5) categories of

elector public officers who are the respondents herein that each of whom have separate and or combined

issue questioned specifically as to each member of the respective categrory or jointly, and that based upon

information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, Petitioner respectfully alleges a question of law

issue as to the captioned Respondents within each category of those public or quasi public officers with

fiduciary duty who were notified of an accessory crime in which each participates in, especially if their

respective vote is cast as an elector are :

a. The Electors who are Public Officers elected to Congress duty as to matter of law and facts.

b. The Electors who are Public Union trustees have fiduciary duty as to matter of law and facts.

c. The Electors who are Registered Lobbyists have fiduciary duty as to matter of law and facts.

d. All the Electors as Public Officers when notified of crime have duty as to the law and facts.

e. The Elector private person as an Elector Public Officer duty as to matter of law and facts.

13. That Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7801 as to the nature of proceeding for relief

by writ of mandamus or prohibition that shall be obtained in a proceeding under this article is made for a writ

or order of prohibition, in which such reference shall, so far as applicable, be deemed to refer to the

proceeding authorized by this article.



14. That Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7802 as to captioned Parties of electors listed

herein in part is in keeping with the definition of "body or officer", and the expression "body or officer" that

includes every court, tribunal, board, corporation, officer, or other person, or aggregation of persons, whose

action may be affected by a proceeding under this article; and that Petitioner contends that Respondent

Electors have maliciously acted contrary to the prohibition in favor of another and where this proceeding is

brought to restrain the Electors individually and as a body or officers from proceeding without or in excess of

jurisdiction in favor of another, the latter shall be joined as a party; and that Petitioner understands that other

interested persons in adequately represented by Petitioner actions herein by order of the court may direct that

notice of the proceeding be given to any person, and may allow other interested persons to intervene were it

not to prejudice the emergency nature of this action.

15. In addition to the above question Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7803

raises Questions that may be raised in a proceeding under this article that are as follows:

AS AND FOR THE SECOND QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS HAKEEM

JEFFRIES AND GRACE MENG AS TO NEW U.S. HOUSE MEMBERS AND

ELECTORS WITH A DUTY AS TO A MATTER OF LAW AND FACTS ARE IN

CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AS SUCH PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED ARE

BARRED ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE REVIEW AFTER JANUARY 2, 2013. 16. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 15

with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers Respondent

Hakeem Jeffries and Respondent Grace Meng as to new U.S. House members and Electors with a duty as to

matter of law and facts are in conflict with U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 2, i.e. A2S1C2

states “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of

Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be

entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of

Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.” as such persons

similarly situated are barred Electoral College vote review after January 2, 2013.



17. Other than U.S. Constitution Article VI it does not specify the form of oath a Congressman is to take

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

and was a function of the respective state and federal law as in New York State Public Officer Law §10

requires every public officer to take and file an oath or affirmation prior to the discharge of any of their

official duties and to be certified to the clerk of the respective body . The form of the oath or affirmation is

set forth in Article XIII, Section 1 of the New York State Constitution ( ) 1

18. That Petitioner’s understanding of the Decision and Order of Justice Schmidt referenced above is

that a New York Electoral College Elector is merely a private person not required to take an oath in New

York or elsewhere to uphold the State or Federal Constitution and as such may vote as a private person.

19. That Petitioner’s New York State Assembly Representative of the 57th AD is presently Respondent

Hakeem Jeffries of 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 and pending the final tally and

canvassing by the end of the month of November will also be the Elected member of the United States House

of Representatives from the New York 8th House District

20. That Respondent Hakeem Jeffries intends as a House member to take his oath to uphold the State

and US Constitution on Janaury 3, 2013, intends to sit in the joint session of Congress thereafter to review

his own and other votes as an elector as a second bite of the apple despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 to do

so; and intends so despite that Respondent has been given notice by Petitioner.

1 NYSC ARTICLE XIII Public Officers [Oath of office; no other test for public office] Section 1. Members of the legislature, and all officers, executive and judicial, except such inferior officers as shall be by law exempted, shall, before they enter on the duties of their respective offices, take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of New York, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of ......, according to the best of my ability;" no other oath, declaration or test shall be required as a qualification for any office of public trust, except that any committee of a political party may, by rule, provide for equal representation of the sexes on any such committee, and a state convention of a political party, at which candidates for public office are nominated, may, by rule, provide for equal representation of the sexes on any committee of such party. (Amended by Constitutional Convention of 1938 and approved by vote of the people November 8, 1938.)



21. Respondent Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 is a American lawyer

holding an office of trust and profit and is a member of the New York State Assembly, representing the 22nd

assembly district in Flushing, Queens, New York, and pending the final tally and canvassing by the end of

November will also be the Elected member of the United States House of Representatives from the New

York 6th House District.

22. That the Respondent Grace Meng as a House member takes her oath to uphold the State and U.S.

Constitution before Janaury 3, 2013, and then intends to sit in the joint session of Congress thereafter to

review her own and other votes as an elector as a second bite of the apple despite the prohibitition by

A2S1C2 to do so; and intends so despite that Respondent has been given notice by Petitioner.

23. That arguendo re A2S1C2, “but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of

Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector“ use is still with the original meaning

and intent despite the addition of the 12th , 14th , 16th and 20th Amendments notwithstanding; and that the

original use before ratification of the 14th amendment considered each State of the several States was

sovereign and not subservient to the USA in regards to the enforcement of the Bill of Rights applied to the

Federal entity that was properly termed these United States not as now termed after ratification of the `14th

Amendment (1868) became the singular United States, as each State of the several States became and now

remain subservient along with every state citizen therein placed under USA jurisdiction per se; and

24. Further arguendo re original use of A2S1C2, “but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding

an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector“ includes any state

officer and or public officer accordingly, and that the same meaning for “Senator” who was appointed by the

respective State legislature before the 17th Amendment as the representative of the respective State is then

and now intended to equate that relationship to every House member even though elected by State Citizens

privileged to vote, and therefore also equates to every “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” too,

and therefore includes every Public officer, in any state or federal jurisdiction, all except a private person per

se; and.



25. Furthermore arguendo re the issues of Law with Facts pertaining to the misapplication and

misadministration of Public Officer acts in 2012 as relate to the December 5, 2008 Order and Decision as a

matter of State Law heard by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. at I.A.S. Part 1 in the Article 78

Petition with Kings County Index No.: 2008-29641 as a matter of the Federal Law of the Land A2S1C2 still

un-amended is that the only interpretation of State law involved in the Order and Decision of December 5,

2008 by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. must be in keeping with the exclusive power, McPherson v.

Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), of the New York State Legislature in its plenary formation of the New York

electoral college may not change the meaning of A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 at best would have to be a retiring

public officer to serve as an elector but make any “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” after

January 2, of the year following the general election of the POTUS ineligible and as such the member of the

respective Electoral College is to be a private U.S. Citizen under Federal jurisdiction as an elector is a public

officer per se who votes by no later than December 25, 2012 every four years and when the joint seating of

Congress convenes on January 3, 2013 the next year and every four years thereafter until there is a

amendment to the quasi Federal officer status of an elector means that without an amendment, no State and

or Congress may change the eligibility requirements of a Federal officer includes the elector as well as that

of POTUS with A2S1C5, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).

26. A State Officer and local officer as public officers hold an office of trust, and that persons registered

with a privilege from the State such as an attorney, union trustee, lobbyist hold an office of trust for profit.

27. That were Respondents Grace Meng, Hakeem Jeffries and or anyother person similarly situated

according to A2S1C2 who are officers of the State while acting as electors and as persons holding an office

of trust or profit to review their own vote in Congress after Janaury 2, 2013 and also be an elector would

infringe Petitioner’s right to suffrage, a republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; and

therefore, Respondents acts as public officers is and would be contrary to the law of the land as each

Respondent must either be barred from voting or office and or if done be referred for criminal action.



AS AND FOR THE THIRD QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO ARE THE

ELECTORS WHO ARE PUBLIC UNION TRUSTEES WHO HAVE A FIDUCIARY

DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE

POTUS ELIGIBILITY QUALIFICATIONS OF A2S1C5 AND ARE IN CONFLICT

WITH A2S1C2 AND ARE BARRED FROM SUCH VOTE AS A BREACH OF A

FIDUCIARY DUTY TO THEIR MEMBERSHIP AND PEOPLE OF NEW YORK

28. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 27

with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who are the

electors who are public union trustees have a fiduciary duty as to matters of law and facts attempt

to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications of A2S1C5 and are in conflict with A2S1C2, are

barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to their membership and People of the State of

New York.

29. That Respondent George Gresham is a incumbent elected President of 1199 SEIU United

Healthcare Workers East to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college.

30. That Respondent George Gresham is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as

a qusai Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest

as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elelctor

tovote by Decmber 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner.

31. That Respondent Mario Cilento is a incumbent elected President of the New York State AFL-CIO

by the organization's Executive Council to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral

college.

32. That Respondent Mario Cilento is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a

qusai Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest



as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector

to vote by December 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner.

33. That Respondent Scott Adams is a incumbent elected director of UAW Region 9 with Local 686

Local 774 Local 1069 Local 1097 Local 2300 Local 3303 to participate as a member of the State of New

York electoral college

34. That Respondent Scott Adams is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a

quasi Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest



35. That were Public Union Fiduciary Respondents and any other similar representative similarly

situated to cast a vote a POTUS candidate that is not eligible for POTUS would infringe Union member trust

and similarly private US citizens like Petitioner’s right to suffrage, republican form of governement,

Freedom and Liberty; and therefore, their action as public officers is contrary and should lead to removal

from their office and or disbanning the respective union and return of alll union member funds.

AS AND FOR THE FOURTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO ARE

THE ELECTORS WHO ARE REGISTERED LOBBYISTS HAVE FIDUCIARY

DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ARE QUASI PUBLIC OFFICERS

WITH A FIDUCIARY DUTY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE POTUS ELIGIBILITY

QUALIFICATIONS OF A2S1C5 AND ARE IN CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AND

ARE BARRED FROM SUCH VOTE AS A BREACH OF A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK



electors who are registered lobbyists have fiduciary duty as to matters of law and facts are quasi

public officers with a fiduciary duty attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications of



A2S1C5 and are in conflict with A2S1C2, are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary

duty to the People of the State of New York

37. That Respondent Emily Giske is a incumbent government affairs specialist based in New York with

extensive experience in Albany and New York City. She has lobbied for corporations, financial institutions,

not-for-profit entities and local municipalities including Las Vegas gambling interests lobbyist to participate

as a member of the State of New York electoral college.

38. That Respondent Emily Giske is a lobbyist with the state of New York as a qusai Public Officer as

a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest as an elector despite the

prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector to vote by Decmber 15,

2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner.

39. That were a Lobbyist registered in New York and any other similar representative similarly situated

to cast a vote a POTUS candidate that is not eligible for POTUS would infringe the trust due the People of

New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty.

And therefore their action as public officers is contrary and should lead to removal of Respondents license,

order fines levied under State Lobbying law, and crimnal investigation.

AS AND FOR THE FIFTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO also are

AN ELECTOR PUBLIC OFFICER ALSO HAVE DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF

LAW AND FACTS ABSENT A VIOLATION OF LAW MAY NOT VOTE FOR

WHOM THEY WISH BY CHANGING THE ELIGIBILITY OF POTUS.


with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that all public officers holding more

than one public officer job for pay excluding a commissioner of deeds or notary public with a fiduciary

duty attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications are in conflict with A2S1C2 and

A2S1C5 and are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to the People of the State of

New York; and



41. That each Elector is mandated by the State of New York legislature with exclusive power afforded

by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker,

146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification

requirements of a federal officer including that of office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514

U.S. 779 (1995) as apply to each respondent below:

42. That Respondent Robert Duffy is the incumbent 76th Lieutenant Governor of New York to

participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

43. That Respondent Keith L.T. Wright is a incumbent Member of the New York State Assembly

from the 70th district to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

44. That Respondent Stephanie Miner is a incumbent 53rd Mayor of the city of Syracuse New York to


45. That Respondent Sheila Comar is a incumbent elected Executive committee chair of the New York

State Democratic Committee to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

46. That Respondent Joseph Morelle is a incumbent member of the New York State Assembly

representing the 132nd Assembly District, which includes eastern portions of the City of Rochester and the

Monroe County suburbs of Irondequoit and Brighton to participate as a member of the State of New York

electoral college

47. That Respondent Christine C. Quinn is a incumbent Speaker of the New York City Council

representing District 3 to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

48. That Respondent Ruben Diaz, Jr. is a incumbent President of the Borough of the Bronx in New

York City to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

49. That Respondent Ken Jenkins is a incumbent Westchester County 16th District legislator, and was

elected again Chairman of The Board of Legislators to participate as a member of the State of New York

electoral college

50. That Respondent Steve Bellone is a incumbent Suffolk County Executive to participate as a

member of the State of New York electoral college



51. That Respondent Felix Ortiz is a incumbent representing New York's 51st Assembly District to


52. That Respondent Anne Marie Anzalone is a incumbent appointed Chief of staff to Representative

Joe Crowley of the 7th New York Congressional District to participate as a member of the State of New


53. That Respondent William Thompson is a incumbent selected by the NYS Governor to head NYC's

Battery Park City Authority to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

54. That Respondent Scott Stringer is a incumbent 26th Borough President of Manhattan to participate

as a member of the State of New York electoral college

55. That Respondent Bill DeBlasio is a incumbent New York City elected official, holding the citywide

office of New York City Public Advocate to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral

college

56. That Respondent Byron Brown is a incumbent mayor of Buffalo, New York to participate as a


57. That Respondent Gerald D. Jennings is a incumbent mayor of Albany, New York to participate as

a member of the State of New York electoral college

58. That Respondent Archie Spigner is a incumbent District Leader for the 29th A.D. - Part A, and

Executive Member of the Guy R. Brewer United Democratic Club to participate as a member of the State of

New York electoral college

59. That although the following public officers are being questionably protected by the enormity of

Justice Schack invidious infringement of Petitioner basic rights otherwise protected by the US Constitution

and 14th Amendment guarantees and related State law with an order and decision taken on appeal case 2012-

5515 filing pending, the following public officers would be effected by a Court decision herein as follows:

a. That Andrew M. Cuomo is a incumbent 56th Governor of New York to participate as a member

of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS

Attorney General and an elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded to vote.



b. That Tom DiNapoli is a incumbent 54th Comptroller of the state of New York to participate as a

member of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as

the NYS Attorney General and an elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded to vote.

c. That Sheldon Silver is a incumbent Member of the New York State Assembly from the 64th

district and speaker of the assembly to participate as a member of the State of New York

electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS Attorney General and an

elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded anyway to vote.

d. That Eric Schneiderman is a incumbent 65th Attorney General of New York to participate as a


60. That all the above named Public Officer Respondents as the body and or its officers with

the expressed exception of private US Citizens as electors that failed or are about to perform a duty

enjoined upon it by the law of the land as to the requirement to conform to U.S. Constitution Article

2 Section 1 Paragraph 5 as to the eligibility requirements for any candidate for the office of the

POTUS; and

61. That the named Respondents as the body and or its officers that proceeded, and is

proceeding or is about to proceed without or in excess of jurisdiction to allow violation of NBC

Eligibility ; and


proceeding or is about to proceed despite the warning of the misprision of felony sedition and

treason are to be referred for criminal investigation and removal from office under New York Civil

Service Law Section 105;

63. That Respondent public officers as Elector Public Officers have duty as to matter of law and facts

and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due the People of New

York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty.



AS AND FOR THE SIXTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO AS THE

ELECTOR PRIVATE PERSON WITHOUT ANOTHER PUBLIC OFFICE AS AN

ELECTOR PUBLIC OFFICER ALSO HAVE DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW

AND FACTS BUT ABSENT A VIOLATION OF LAW MAY VOTE FOR WHOM

THEY WISH.


with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who as the

Elector private person without another public office as an Elector Public Officer also have duty as to matters

of law and facts but when absent a violation of law may vote for whom they wish.

65. That Respondent Irene Stein is a candidate past super delegate in the 2008 Democratic presidential

nomination and wife of Peter Stein the Tomkins County legislator for the 11th District to participate as a


66. That Respondent Walter Cooper is a candidate in an individual capacity as a citizen of New York

to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

67. The Elector private person as a US Citizen without another public office as an Elector Public Officer

also have duty as to matter of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would

infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of

governement, Freedom and Liberty.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner wishes a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction

hearing, and Declaratory judgment under CPLR §7806 and permanent injunction against the

Respondents of each category and such other relief as the Court deems just including a TRO Order:

a. A hearing on the legal issues as to the void ab initio US Senate Election in New York..

b. A hearing on the issues of facts as to forgery, sedition and treason.

c. A hearing on the issues of the actual historical meaning of Natural Born Citizen held by

the State of New York from before and after the 1776


'-4' L


d. That Public Officers elected to Congress and as a public officer electors be barred from

reviewing the elector votes in keeping to the mandates of the law of the land

e. That based upon a review of the facts associated with the forgery of public documents to

facilitate usurpation of the office of POTUS that Electors be given notice of their being

held as an accessory after the fact to a forgery crime that would be referred for criminal

proceeding.

f. That based upon a review of the facts associated with the allegation of misprision of

felony sedition and treason that Electors be given notice of their being held as an

accessory after the fact to a felony, sedition and warned of treason per se crime that

would be referred for criminal proceeding.

g. That electors be instructed as to the actual historical meaning of Natural Born Citizen

held by the state' of New York from before and after the 1776 issuance of the

Declaration of Independence and with the proviso that were a Public Officer other than

an independent elector per se to attempt to change the eligibility of a federal offrcer

would be held in civil contempt in breach of public officer duties.

h. And for further and different relief as the Court may deem necessary herein.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York November /+ 2012

Christopher-Earl: Strunk, in esse, Petitioner self-represent without being an attorney 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #28 1, Brooklyn, New York 1 1238. (845) 90 1-6767 E-mail: [email protected]



PETITION VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.

COUNTY OF KINGS )

Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of

perjury:

I have read the foregoing Petition with six (6) questions at issue against each category of

Respondent Public Officers and ~lectors' in their official capacity and or individually as against the

unlawful misadministration and misapplication of New York Public Officers in the conduct of the

General Election of November 6,201 2 in the election of US Senator Kirsten Gillibrand that is void

ab initio, and in which Petitioner wishes a writ of prohibition with Temporary Restraining Order

and permanent injunction with a Declaratory Judgment equity relief under jurisdiction of the CPLR

Article 78 in conjunction with the New York State Election Law Article $16-100 requires

emergency equity relief with a CPLR $7805 injunction with stay of New York Electoral College

vote due by December 15,2012, and a declaratory judgment under CPLR $7806 as time is of the

essence with irreparable harm; the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters

therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true.

The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd

parties, books and records, and personal knowledge.

26% ' ,. Christopher-Earl: Strunk -- -. .

Sworn t o before me - ~ I- - - . -. - 7

-_ _ ,- . . 7

ARNOLD 1. TlSHFlELD '-- :-

Notary Public State Of New YO;~" - - , - N0.41-4611662

Qualified In Queens County Certified in Kings County

Commission Expires March 30, 20


SUPREME COURT OF TIIE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS

Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 Index No.:

9

Petitioner,

Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Bill DeBlasio of 442 11th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037 Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001 William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023 Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street --New York, NY 10014 Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11 103 Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Sheet -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710 Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 . Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849; and Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Oflice 478 Russell Washington, DC 205 10

NOTICE OF PETITION PETITION PETITION VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT n

self-represent without being an attorney 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281, Brooklyn, New York 11238. (845) 901-6767 E-mail: chris@,strunk.ws

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse

Petitioner

1. Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 2. Bill DeBlasio of 442 11th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 1 1215 3. Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232

5. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 6. George Gresham 13 13 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 7. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 1W73 8. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 9. Robert D u e 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 146 10 10. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 -e r cK Koaa -- wear

13. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 -ran-N -- IV,K - 15. Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue --New York, NY 10037 16. Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A --New York, NY 10001 17. William Thompson of 106 West 121 st Street -- New York, NY 10027 18. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023 19. Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street --New York, NY 10014 20. Scott Adams of 1 1 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 2 1. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 22. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 23. Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11 103 24. Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 1 1354 25. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 26. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 27. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 28. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849 29. Ken Jenkins 108 ush he^ Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 107 10

jo- ~ ( l h ~ p GIL&IB)Z~ND DCQFRCG q@ &rJaL Respondents w &S~/rvGm(3 P L

NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ARTICLE 78 PETITION WITH AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING A

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS

Please take notice of Petitioner's intent to file an order to show cause application a t the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 11 AM on the 10th Floor intake a t 360 Adams Street on Monday November 19, 2012 for a preliminary injunction relief pending a declaratory judgment on issues of law; e.g., Are public officers to be held liable as accessories to felonies in usurpation of Office of POTUS and Ballot access? Are public officers presented with the facts of Barack Obarna ineligibility able to change qualifications before the Electoral College Vote scheduled December 15, 2012?

For further information Contact :

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse W w w b a j~*~leo. i ~7977-7 r/ 593 Yanderbilf Avenue - 281

Brooklyn New York 11238 Cellphone: 845-901 -6767

.= \ Email: [email protected]

Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.; 21948 / 2012

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICESTATE OF NEW YORK )

) ss.COUNTY OF ULSTER )

Accordingly, I, H. William Van Allen, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:

a. Am over 18 years of age and not a party to this action.b. My place of business is located at 351 North Road Hurley New York 12243.c. On November 14, 2012, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of the NOTICE OF

PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 13,2012 along with aNOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARYINJUNCTION PENDING A DECLARATORY INJUNCTION ON ISSUE OF LAW AS TO ELECTORSDECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS, a Notice of Petitioner's intent to file an order to show causeapplication at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 10 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street onMonday November 19,2012 placing a complete set in a properly addressed to each respondent listed below fordelivery by USPS by certified mail with request for return receipt for proof of service.

d. On November 14, 2012, I caused each copy with proper postage for service by certified mail on the listed Electors andwhere each envelope was properly addressed with the Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" and "PERSONAL &CONFIDENTIAL" in the lower left hand corner of the envelop that was then deposited with the USPS for service upon:

1. Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 112382. Grace Meng ofl47l4 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 113543. Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 112324. Bill DeBlasio of 442 lith Street -- Brooklyn. NY 112155. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #[2G -- New York. NY 100256. Keith L.T. Wright of2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York. NY 100377. Christine C. Quinn of263 Ninth Avenue. #3A -- New York, NY 100018. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York. NY 100279. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street. #3A -- New York, NY 1002310. Emily Giske 01'440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 1001411. Anne Marie Anzaloue 2827 48th Street -- Astoria. NY 1110312. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, N'r' 1143313. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 1046614. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of820 Boyton Avenue. #6D -- Bronx. NY 1047315. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers. NY 1071016. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 1096217. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany. NY 1220818. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 1420819. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 1461020. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 1460921. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 1412722. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 1322423. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 1170424. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 1485025. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849;26. Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510

Sworn to before meThis i day of November 2012

~<-Drl Q ~k.o-~tary Pubhc

CM I RR No 7012101000068749741CM I RR No 7012101000068749819CM I RR No 7012101000068749758CM I RR No 7012101000068749765CM I RR No 7012101000068749956CM I RR No 7012101000068749826CM I RR No 7012101000068749833CM IRR No 7012101000068749840CM I RR No 7012101000068749857CM I RR No 7012101000068749864CM I RR No 7012101000068749901CM IRR No 7012101000068750242CM I RR No 7012101000068749963CM I RR No 7012101000068749796CM I RR No 7012101000068749949CM I RR No 7012101000068749895CM I RR No 7012101000068749970CM I RR No 7012101000068749802CM IRR No 7012101000068749772CM I RR No 7012101000068749789CM I RR No 7012101000068749871CM I RR No 7012101000068749888CM I RR No 7012101000068749918CM I RR No 7012101 000068749925CM I RR No 7012101000068749932

C"!Rl'N~':'00006R7499R7

/#~/;l.v~2r;;/rlliam Van Allen ~

JUDITHS.MA YHONNOTARYPUBUC, STAT£; OF NEW YORK

NO.01MA60B5585QUALIFIED IN ULSTER COUNTY/'(j

COMMISSION EXPIRES JUt Y 14, 20__

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit D

Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012

Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s Affidavit in support of Note of Issue Page 1 of 3

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS Index No.: 21948 / 2012 -----------------------------------------------------------------------x Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse Filed November 14, 2012 593 Vanderbilt Avenue – 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 Petitioner, -against- Hakeem Jeffries , Grace Meng, Felix Ortiz, Bill DeBlasio, PETITIONER’S Walter Cooper, Keith L.T. Wright, Christine C. Quinn, William Thompson, Scott Stringer, Emily Giske, AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF Anne Marie Anzalone, Archie Spigner, George Gresham, Ruben Diaz, Jr.; Ken Jenkins; Mario Cilento; NOTE OF ISSUE WITH Gerald D. Jennings; Byron Brown ; Robert Duffy; Joseph Morelle; Scott Adams ; Stephanie Miner; Steve Bellone; CERTIFICATE OF READINESS Irene Stein; Sheila Comar; and Kirsten Gillibrand FOR TRIAL OF ISSUES AND Respondents. -----------------------------------------------------------------------x FOR PARTIAL SEVERANCE STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KINGS ) Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury: To: Hon. David I. Schmidt J.S.C. Part 1,

Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. Part 27,

1. This is Petitioner’s affidavit in support of his note of issue and certificate of readiness by CPLR §3402

for a trial of issues by December 14, 2012 with partial severance for the benefit of captioned Respondent

electors of the New York State Legislature’s Electoral College and members of Congress before the deadline

to vote by December 17, 2012, and after January 3, 2013 for candidates for the office of President of the

United States, and that whether by casting a vote for Barack Obama each may be charged with the crime of

accessory after the fact of a felony committed on or about 25 April 2011 by persons as yet named, aided and

abetted by White House Counsel Bob Bauer, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney and Barack Obama who

during the 27 April 2012 White House Press Conference, see the transcript evidence herein (see Exhibit 1),

expressly presented a forged instrument to the People of the United States, a crime compounded by spoliation,

concealment, perjury, tampering with the public record, intimidation of witnesses and other crimes.


Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s Affidavit in support of Note of Issue Page 2 of 3

TRIAL OF THE FACTS

2. That Petitioner requires a trial of the facts of a crime before December 17, 2012 essential for the

proper execution of the Electoral College vote, say on December 13, 2012, and at which Petitioner will bring

only one expert witness for testimony by Typographer Graphics Expert Paul Edward Irey from Delray Beach

Florida to testify solely as to the nature of the forgery referenced above without determination of who the

perpetrators are per se, as that is a criminal matter for authorities with jurisdiction.

3. That expert testimony by Paul Edward Irey is based upon the Affidavit with Exhibits A through D

affirmed December 4, 2012, and herewith (see Exhibit 2) that is res ipso loquitur.

4. Petitioner contends that the body of the crime complained of has been brought to the attention of

Respondents and various district attorneys with authority and jurisdiction to further investigate, and that the

testimony deals with the fact that in 1961, well before computers or such other technologies that may be in use

today, that ANY birth certificate paperwork was done either by hand and or on forms designed for use with the

mechanical typewriter technology that was then widely used, rendering a forgery detectible; and that testimony

presents the proof of forgery in the context of then mechanical technology in use, and also to prove the forged

instrument is of current manufacturer, that the forgers use of the Unsharp Mask software by Adobe to create a

Halo around lettering thus also sets the chain of custody of the forgery along with where it was manufactured.

5. That Respondent public officers as if Elector Public Officers and private US Citizens have duty as to

matters of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due

the People of New York as similarly to Petitioner’s right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom

and Liberty, any elelctor who would commit a crimne by adiding and abbetting a felony is incompatibkle. as to

New York State law as applies to the public officer oath, duties and obligation with use of NYS Civil Service

Law §105A and is to be barred as a person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States.

6. That it is a well-settled common law rule that a public officer cannot hold two incompatible offices

simultaneously (Matter of Smith v Dillon, 267 App. Div. 39, 43 [1943]). This rule seeks to prevent offices of

public trust from accumulating in a single individual. Two offices are incompatible if one is subordinate to the

other or there is an inherent inconsistency between the two offices (see People ex rel. Ryan v Green, 58 NY


Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of Note of Issue

Exhibit 1

Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • Briefing Room • Press Briefings Search WhiteHouse.gov

For Immediate Release April 27, 2011

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

8:48 A.M. EDT

MR. CARNEY: Good morning, everybody. You can read the paperwork we just handed out in a minute. Let me

just get started. Thank you for coming this morning. I have with me today Dan Pfeiffer, the President’s Director of

Communications, as well as Bob Bauer, the President’s White House Counsel, who will have a few things to say

about the documents we handed to you today. And then we'll take your questions. I remind you this is off camera

and only pen and pad, not for audio. And I give you Dan Pfeiffer.

MR. PFEIFFER: Thanks, Jay. What you have in front of you now is a packet of papers that includes the

President’s long-form birth certificate from the state of Hawaii, the original birth certificate that the President

requested and we posted online in 2008, and then the correspondence between the President’s counsel and the

Hawaii State Department of Health that led to the release of those documents.

If you would just give me a minute to -- indulge me a second to walk through a little of the history here, since all

of you weren't around in 2008 when we originally released the President’s birth certificate, I will do that. And then

Bob Bauer will walk through the timeline of how we acquired these documents.

In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of

B L O G PO ST S ON T H I S I SS UE

March 11, 2012 8:04 PM EDT

Call with President Karzai Following theReport of Afghan Civilian Casualties

President Obama reached

out to President Karzai

Sunday following the

reported killing and

sounding of Afghan

civilians.

March 11, 2012 9:00 AM EDT

From the Archives: Tsunami in Japan

Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne...

1 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

Hawaii. We received that document; we posted it on the website. That document was then inspected by

independent fact checkers, who came to the campaign headquarters and inspected the document -- independent

fact checkers did, and declared that it was proof positive that the President was born in Hawaii.

To be clear, the document we presented on the President’s website in 2008 is his birth certificate. It is the piece

of paper that every Hawaiian receives when they contact the state to request a birth certificate. It is the birth

certificate they take to the Department of Motor Vehicles to get their driver’s license and that they take to the federal

government to get their passport. It is the legally recognized document.

That essentially -- for those of you who followed the campaign closely know that solved the issue. We didn’t

spend any time talking about this after that. There may have been some very fringe discussion out there, but as a

campaign issue it was settled and it was --

Q When you posted this did you post the other side of it where the signature is?

MR. PFEIFFER: Yes.

Q Because it is not here and that's been an issue.

MR. PFEIFFER: We posted both sides and when it was looked at it was looked at by -- the fact checkers came

to headquarters and actually examined the document we had.

That settled the issue. In recent weeks, the issue has risen again as some folks have begun raising a question

about the original -- about the long-form birth certificate you now have in front of you. And Bob will explain why --

the extraordinary steps we had to take to receive that and the legal restraints that are in place there.

But it became an issue again. And it went to -- essentially the discussion transcended from the nether regions of

the Internet into mainstream political debate in this country. It became something that when both Republicans and

Democrats were talking to the media they were asked about. It was a constant discussion on mainstream news

organizations. And the President believed that it was becoming a distraction from the major issues we're having in

this country.

And he was particularly struck by the fact that right after the Republicans released their budget framework and

the President released his, we were prepared to have a very important, very vigorous debate in this country about

the future of the country, the direction we’re going to take, how we’re doing to deal with very important issues like

education, Medicare, how we’re going to deal with taxes in this country. And that should -- that’s the debate we

should be having yet.

Facebook

Twitter

Flickr

Google+

YouTube

Vimeo

iTunes

LinkedIn

A look back at the U.S. response to the devastating

earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan in March of

2011.

March 10, 2012 6:30 AM EDT

Weekly Address: Investing in a CleanEnergy FutureSpeaking from a factory in Virginia, President

Obama talks about how companies are creating

more jobs in the United States, making better

products than ever before, and how many are

developing new technologies that are reducing our

dependence on foreign oil and saving families

money at the pump.

VIEW ALL RELATED BLOG POSTS


2 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

What was really dominating a lot of discussion was this fake controversy, essentially, a sideshow, that was

distracting from this real issue. And an example of that would be when major Democrats and Republicans went onto

mainstream news organizations to talk about their budget plans -- including the President -- they were asked about

this. They were asked about what they thought about the controversy. They were asked if they believed the

President was born in the United States. And it was really a distraction.

That really struck the President, led him to ask his counsel to look into whether we could ask the state of Hawaii

to release the long-form certificate, which is not something they generally do. And he did that despite the fact that it

probably was not in his long-term -- it would have been in his -- probably in his long-term political interests to allow

this birther debate to dominate discussion in the Republican Party for months to come. But he thought even though

it might have been good politics, he thought it was bad for the country. And so he asked counsel to look into this.

And now I’ll have Bob explain that, and then we’ll take your questions.

MR. CARNEY: I just want to -- sorry, I meant to mention at the top, as some of you may have seen, the

President will be coming to the briefing room at 9:45 a.m., making a brief statement about this -- not taking

questions, but just wanted to let you know.

MR. PFEIFFER: And he will use this as an opportunity to make a larger point about what this debate says about

our politics.

Go ahead, Bob.

MR. BAUER: Early last week the decision was made to review the legal basis for seeking a waiver from the

longstanding prohibition in the state Department of Health on releasing the long-form birth certificate. And so we

undertook a legal analysis and determined a waiver request could be made that we had the grounds upon which to

make that request.

And by Thursday of last week, I spoke to private counsel to the President and asked her to contact the State

Department of Health and to have a conversation about any requirements, further requirements, that they thought

we had to satisfy to lodge that waiver request. She had that conversation with the state Department of Health on

Thursday -- counsel in question is Judy Corley at the law firm of Perkins Coie, and you have a copy of the letter she

subsequently sent to the department with the President’s written request.

The department outlined the requirements for the President to make this request. He signed a letter making that

request on Friday afternoon upon returning from the West Coast. And private counsel forwarded his written request

-- written, signed request -- along with a letter from counsel, to the state Department of Health on Friday.


3 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

The department, as I understood it, after reviewing the law and reviewing the grounds asserted in the request,

came to the conclusion that a waiver could be appropriately granted. We were advised that the long-form birth

certificate could be copied and made available to us as early as Monday, April 25th -- the day before yesterday. And

we made arrangements for counsel to travel to Honolulu to pick it up and it was returned to the White House

yesterday afternoon.

Let me emphasize again, there is a specific statute that governs access to and inspection of vital records in the

state of Hawaii. The birth certificate that we posted online is, in fact, and always has been, and remains, the legal

birth certificate of the President that would be used for all legal purposes that any resident of Hawaii would want to

use a birth certificate for.

However, there is legal authority in the department to make exceptions to the general policy on not releasing the

long-form birth certificate. The policy in question, by the way, on non-release has been in effect since the

mid-1980s, I understand. So while I cannot tell you what the entire history of exceptions has been, it is a limited

one. This is one of very few that I understand have been granted for the reasons set out in private counsel’s letter.

MR. PFEIFFER: We'll be happy to take some questions.

Q I guess I just want to make sure that we’re clear on this. Even though this one says “certificate of live birth”

on here, this is different than the other certificate of live birth that we’ve seen?

MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. The second page there is the one that was posted on the Internet.

Q Okay.

MR. PFEIFFER: And that is a copy of the one that has been kept at the Hawaii Department of Health.

Q Okay. And this is the one that would be referred to -- that people have been asking for that is the birth

certificate?

MR. PFEIFFER: They are both -- the second one is the birth certificate. The one on the top is what is referred

to as the long-form birth certificate. As you can see -- and Bob can walk you through it -- it contains some additional

information that is not on the second page, which was the birth certificate which was released during the campaign.

If you could just explain the difference.


4 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

MR. BAUER: There’s a difference between a certificate and a certification. The certification is simply a

verification of certain information that’s in the original birth certificate. The birth certificate, as you can see, has

signatures at the bottom from the attending physician, the local registrar, who essentially oversees the maintenance

of the records. It contains some additional information also -- that is to say, the original birth certificate -- it contains

some additional information like the ages of the parents, birthplaces, residence, street address, the name of the

hospital.

The core information that’s required for legal purposes and that is put into the actual certification that’s a

computer-generated document, which we posted in 2008, that information is abstracted, if you will, from the original

birth certificate, put into the computerized short-form certification, and made available to Hawaiian residents at their

request.

So the long form, which is a certificate, has more information, but the short form has the information that’s legally

sufficient for all the relevant purposes.

Q This first one has never been released publicly, correct?

MR. BAUER: That’s correct. It is in a bound volume in the records at the state Department of Health in Hawaii.

Q Bob, can you explain why President Obama let this drag on for four years? Was it Donald Trump that

prompted you to issue this?

MR. BAUER: I’ll let Dan --

MR. PFEIFFER: Sure.

Q I know you expected that question, right? (Laughter.)

MR. PFEIFFER: He even said you would be the one who would ask it. (Laughter.)

I don’t think this dragged on for four years because this was a resolved -- for those of you who remember the

campaign, this issue was resolved in 2008. And it has not been an issue, none of you have asked about it, called

about it, reported on it until the last few weeks.

And as I said earlier, it probably would have been -- a lot of the pundits out there have talked about the fact that

this whole birther debate has been really bad for the Republican Party and would probably be good for the

President politically. But despite that, the President, as I said, was struck by how this was crowding out the debate,


5 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

particularly around the budget, on important issues, and was an example of the sort of sideshows that our politics

focuses on instead of the real challenges that we have to confront as a country.

And so that’s why he made this decision now, because it became an issue that transcended sort of this -- it

essentially was something that was talked about, as I said, from the nether regions of the Internet onto mainstream

network newscasts. In fact, Jay has been asked about this just yesterday in this room.

Q So I guess the implication is that you did get political advantage by having not released this until today, over

the course of the last four years?

MR. PFEIFFER: There has been -- no one that I can recall actually asked us to -- we were asked to release the

President’s birth certificate in 2008. We did that. And then no one -- it never -- up until a few weeks ago, there was

never an issue about that that wasn’t the birth certificate from any credible individual or media outlet. And it hasn’t

been until -- I mean, Jay was asked about this yesterday --

Q When you say that, you mean certification -- you released the certification?

MR. PFEIFFER: When any Hawaiian wants -- requests their birth certificate because they want to get a driver’s

license, they want to get a passport, they do exactly what the President did in 2008. And that’s what that is. And we

released that. And that’s what any Hawaiian would do to release their birth certificate. And that was good enough

for everyone until very recently this became a question again. And so the President made this decision. He’ll talk to

you more about his thinking on that.

Q And this is going to sound -- I mean, you can just anticipate what people are going to -- remain

unconvinced. They’re going to say that this is just a photocopy of a piece of paper, you could have typed anything

in there. Will the actual certificate be on display or viewable at any -- (laughter.)

Q Will the President be holding it?

MR. PFEIFFER: He will not, and I will not leave it here for him to do so. But it will -- the State Department of

Health in Hawaii will obviously attest that that is a -- what they have on file. As Bob said, it’s in a book in Hawaii.

MR. BAUER: And you’ll see the letter from the director of the Health Department that states that she oversaw

the copy and is attesting to --

Q But do you understand that this could quiet the conspiracy theorists?


6 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

MR. PFEIFFER: There will always be some selection of people who will believe something, and that's not the

issue. The issue is that this is not a discussion that is just happening among conspiracy theorists. It’s happening

here in this room; it’s happening on all of the networks. And it’s something that, as I said, every major political figure

of both parties who’s actually out trying to talk about real issues is asked about this by the media. And so the

President decided to release this. And I'll leave it to others to decide whether there’s still -- there will be some who

still have a different -- have a conspiracy about this.

Q You’ve got two certified copies, according to this study. You have these physical --

MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. I showed you one. Just one.

Q You showed us a photocopy of one.

MR. PFEIFFER: No, I showed you --

Q Does that have a stamp?

MR. PFEIFFER: It has a seal on it.

Q Why does this rise to the level of a presidential statement?

MR. PFEIFFER: The President -- this in itself -- when you hear the President I think you’ll understand the point

he’s making. That will be in not too long.

Q Did the President change his own mind about this? In other words, was he advocating during the campaign

let’s just put it out there and get it over with, or was this an internal shift in thinking based -- in other words, was it

the President who steadfastly during the campaign said this is ridiculous, I don't want to give this any more ground,

and has now changed his mind? Or is this the --

MR. PFEIFFER: Let’s be very clear. You were there for the campaign. There was never a question about the

original birth certificate during the campaign. It was a settled issue. I was there for the original decision to release

the birth certificate. I was there when we posted it online. I'm not sure I even knew there was an original one that

was different than the one we posted online because it wasn’t an issue. So it wasn’t like -- let’s be very clear. We

were asked for the President’s birth certificate in 2008; we released the President’s birth certificate; and it was

done. That was it.


7 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

And so there hasn’t been a discussion about this other document for years. It’s only been in the last few weeks.

And so to your second question, the President decided to do this and he'll talk about this when he gets here --

decided to do it at the timeline that Bob laid out because it was a -- this was a sideshow that was distracting from

the real challenges that we're facing.

It’s not just a sideshow for him; it’s a sideshow for our entire politics that have become focused on this.

Q Not to give Donald Trump more publicity than he has, but is he the person who sort of -- sort of that bridge

between what you're calling a fringe and the mainstream? Do you think that he’s the reason why this tripped the

switch to a level where you now have to deal with something you thought was dealt with?

MR. PFEIFFER: It’s not for me to say why mainstream media organizations began to cover this debate. They’ll

have to answer that for themselves.

Q How concerned were you about running against Donald Trump in a general election?

MR. PFEIFFER: I'd refer any questions on the election to the campaign.

Q Can you address the reports of Petraeus to the CIA and DOD --

MR. PFEIFFER: You get points for that, Carol. (Laughter.)

MR. CARNEY: Yes. I don't have -- but you’ll be disappointed to learn that I don't have a personnel

announcement for you. The President will be addressing this -- questions about personnel tomorrow.

Q Dan, was there a debate about whether or not this deserved being discussed by the White House, whether

or not -- and I'm going back to the birth certificate. I lose points, I understand. But was there debate about whether

or not this was worthy of the White House?

MR. PFEIFFER: The point I'd make is that we weren't the ones who -- we're not the first ones to bring this up in

this room. Jay has been asked questions about this; the President has been asked about it in media interviews.

And so that wasn’t a decision that we made, and the President made the decision to do this and he made the

decision to -- and when he comes down here this morning he'll talk to you about why he thinks there’s an important

point to be made here.

Q Getting back to the personnel announcements, does the President understand that these announcements

have been made and sourced satisfactorily for most news organizations before he speaks up and he’s not letting his


8 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

White House corroborate?

MR. CARNEY: I don't have a comment on that for you, Bill. (Laughter.)

Q I mean, this is such BS. It’s all out there and you guys are -- okay, the President is going to talk about this

tomorrow so we can't say anything.

MR. CARNEY: Bill, you're free to make phone calls everywhere you can. I'm just saying that we don't have a

personnel announcement for you today.

Q And he'll tomorrow, he'll cover all the aforementioned switches?

MR. CARNEY: We'll have a personnel announcement tomorrow.

Q Jay, yesterday you talked about failsafe triggers as sort of a positive alternative to spending cuts. I'm

wondering if the White House has any openness to including that, because it’s a White House proposal, including

that in any legislation that would raise the debt ceiling limit.

MR. CARNEY: Well, what we've said very clearly, and I think Secretary Geithner said it eloquently yesterday, it

is a dangerous, risky idea to hold hostage any other -- hold hostage, rather, raising the debt ceiling, a vote on

raising the debt ceiling, to any other piece of legislation. The commitment this President has to moving aggressively

towards a comprehensive deficit reduction plan is clear. It will be clear again when the Vice President convenes a

meeting, bipartisan, bicameral meeting, next week. And he hopes that progress will be made on that very quickly.

In terms of negotiating what that would look like, I think the negotiators should do that, led by the Vice President,

Republicans and Democrats together. But again, explicitly linking or holding hostage the absolute necessity of

raising the debt ceiling to any other piece of legislation and declaring that we'll tank the U.S. economy and perhaps

the global economy if we don't get this specific thing that we want, I think is a dangerous and unprecedented thing to

do.

And we're confident, remain confident, that the leaders of both parties in Congress, as well as the President, will

agree with the President, as I have said many times, that we do not have an alternative to raising the debt ceiling

because, as many have said, outside observers, economists and businessmen and women, the impact of that would

be calamitous at best.

Q So even though it’s your own proposal that you guys endorsed you don't want to see it as part of the final


9 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

package?

MR. CARNEY: I'm not negotiating individual pieces of a package that we hope Republicans and Democrats can

come together around from this podium. But again, we believe it’s essential to -- the President believes -- that's one

of the reasons why we're doing this right now -- we believe that these are big debates that need to be had. They

can be contentious, argumentative, serious, comprehensive, detailed, because they’re important; they’re all about

America’s future. And they’re about visions of this country and where we're going that need to be debated. And this

debate was being crowded out in many ways by a sideshow.

And he looks forward to having a debate on the real issues that Americans want us to talk about -- long-term

economic plans, deficit reduction, investments in the kinds of things that will help this economy grow and create

jobs, dealing with our energy needs, a long-term energy plan. These are all issues that have been sidetracked at

least in the public debate by some of the issues that we're talking about this morning.

Q Is there a concern that more and more people were actually starting to believe its sideshow -- I mean,

people have been asking about --

MR. CARNEY: I will let the President speak for himself, but what Dan was saying and I think is important is that

the issue here is that the President feels that this was bad for the country; that it’s not healthy for our political

debate, when we have so many important issues that Americans care about, that affect their lives, to be drawn into

sideshows about fallacies that have been disproven with the full weight of a legal document for several years.

So, again, as Dan said, and a lot of political pundits have said, you could say that it would be good politics,

smart politics, for the President to let this play out. He cares more about what’s good for the country. He wants the

debate on the issues. He wants the focus on the issues that Americans care about.

Q Jay, the President yesterday said that he had been talking to oil exporters about increasing output. Who

specifically has he been talking --

MR. CARNEY: Well, I said -- I want to clarify. I said several times I believe from this podium when asked

questions about our overall handling of the issue of high gas prices that we've had conversations with oil-producing

states and allies and those conversations continue. I don't have specific “the President spoke with this leader or

other government officials spoke with others,” but those are ongoing conversations that, of course, we would be

having in a situation like this.

Q Do you guys have any comment on the NATO soldiers that were killed in Afghanistan and any confirmation

on whether there were Americans?


10 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

MR. CARNEY: I don't have anything for you on that this morning.

Q Just quickly, back on the birth certificate, yesterday you said this was a settled issue. So --

MR. CARNEY: Well, as Dan said, again, it has been a settled issue.

MR. PFEIFFER: From a factual point of view, it’s absolutely a settled issue. But the fact that it was a settled

issue did not keep it from becoming a major part of the political discussion in this town for the last several weeks

here. So there’s absolutely no question that what the President released in 2008 was his birth certificate and

answered that question, and many of your organizations have done excellent reporting which proved that to be the

case. But it continued; the President thought it was a sideshow and chose to take this step today for the reasons

Bob laid out.

Q Aside from the policy distractions that was presented, did you have some concern because it was sort of

reaching back into the mainstream news coverage that this could become a factor in the 2012 election with centrist

voters?

MR. PFEIFFER: No.

Q Just to clarify what this document is --

MR. PFEIFFER: This is the -- the letter first and the two certified copies -- this is one of those. This is the same

thing you have a copy of as the first page of your packet.

Q How did it get here?

MR. PFEIFFER: As Bob said, it arrived by plane -- the President’s personal counsel went to Hawaii and brought

it back and we got it last night.

Q Last night?

MR. PFEIFFER: Last night.

Q What time?

MR. PFEIFFER: Between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.


11 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

Q When did you decide to do this gaggle?

MR. PFEIFFER: What’s that?

Q When was this gaggle put on -- when was this planned?

MR. PFEIFFER: Whatever time you received your guidance suggesting that it would be “this time tomorrow

morning.”

Q Are these letters supposed to demonstrate the legal steps that were involved in releasing it to the White

House counsel?

MR. BAUER: The letters that you have, the personal request from the President, along with the accompanying

letter from private counsel, is merely meant to document the legal path to getting the waiver of that policy so we

could get the long-form certificate.

Q The waiver of Hawaii state government policy?

MR. BAUER: Right. The non-release of the long-form certificate, which has been in effect since the 1980s -- a

natural question would have been, well, what did you do to obtain the waiver, and those letters represent the

request.

Q Well, isn’t it true that anybody who was born in Hawaii can write this letter? I mean, that's all there is to the

waiver process?

MR. BAUER: No. Let me just explain once again because I also noticed, by the way, in one report already the

wrong certificate was actually posted on the website. The certificate with the signatures at the bottom -- and that's a

key difference between the short form and the long form -- the long form has signatures at the bottom from the

attending physician, the local registrar, and the mother, is the original birth certificate, which sits in a bound volume

in the State Department of Health.

The short from is a computerized abstract, and that's the legal birth certificate we requested in 2008 and that

Hawaiians are entitled to. Since the mid-1980s, the State Department of Health, for administrative reasons, only

provides to people who request their birth certificate the short form. They do not provide the long form.

So in order for us to obtain the long form, we had to have a waiver. We had to actually determine that there was


12 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

a legal basis for providing it, and then ask them to exercise their authority to provide us with the long form. The

steps required to accomplish that were a letter from the person with the direct and vital interest -- the President -- so

you have a letter from the President, and then there was an accompanying letter from counsel basically formalizing

the request. So the reason we included that is that those were legal steps we took to obtain the long form by way of

this waiver.

Q Do we have the letter from the President --

MR. BAUER: It’s in the packet.

Q And you went to Hawaii?

MR. BAUER: I did not go to Hawaii. The counsel, Judy Corley, who signed the -- the President’s personal

counsel at Perkins Coie, Judy Corley, whose letter -- signed letter of request is in your packet, traveled to Honolulu

and picked up the birth certificate.

Q A question on the situation regarding the Defense of Marriage Act. Yesterday Attorney General Eric Holder

rejected attacks on Paul Clement, who is taking up defense of the statute on behalf of the U.S. House. Paul

Clement has taken a lot of heat from the LGBT community for volunteering to take up defense of DOMA. Eric

Holder said, “Paul Clement is a great lawyer and has done a lot of really great things for this nation. In taking on the

representation -- representing Congress in connection with DOMA, I think he is doing that which lawyers do when

we’re at our best. That criticism I think was very misplaced.” And Holder went on to compare the criticism of

Clement to attacks on the Justice Department lawyers for their past for detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Does the

President share Eric Holder’s views on this?

MR. CARNEY: We do share Eric Holder’s views on this. We think -- as we said from the beginning when we

talked about -- when I did from this podium -- about the decision no longer from the administration to defend the

Defense of Marriage Act, that we would support efforts by Congress if they so chose to defend it. And so I have

nothing to add to the Attorney General’s comments.

Q Following Monday’s Af-Pak Situation Room meeting, what is the President’s assessment of the situation in

Afghanistan and Pakistan? And does he think that July drawdown is still on?

MR. CARNEY: The President’s policy, which included the beginning of a transition -- beginning of a drawdown

of American troops, is absolutely still on track. I don’t have anything additionally from the meeting yesterday beyond

what we’ve said. But the policy remains as it was.


13 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM

MR. EARNEST: Jay, we should wrap it up here.

MR. CARNEY: Yes. Last one, yes.

Q Given the comments of the Pakistani official quoted in the Wall Street Journal, is Pakistan still a U.S. ally,

and to what extent?

MR. CARNEY: Pakistan is still a U.S. ally.

Thanks.

END 9:18 A.M. EDT


14 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM



Exhibit 2

page 9


Paul Edward Irey’s AFFIDAVIT

Exhibit A



Exhibit B



Exhibit C



Exhibit D

From:

To:

1051324 1051324 1051324

Re: binder 11 ... Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:26 AM

"Henry Wayland Blake" <[email protected]>

"Paul Irey" <[email protected]>, "Doug Vogt" <[email protected]>,[email protected], [email protected], "Chito Papa" <[email protected]>

3 Files (1688KB)

… … …

Dear Paul, I think you have proposed the most probable scenario based on the crea on and file dates of theassociated court documents. 1. The paper copy of the Tepper to Fuddy 3‐page le er was dated 05/26/2012. 2. The electronic version of this 3‐page le er appeared on Scribd on 06/06/2012 3. The Tepper four‐page electronic document 10513240131.pdf (same as 35‐1.pdf) was created on06/04/2012 and was last modified on 06/06/2012. Pages 1‐3 of this document are the 3 electronicpages of the Tepper to Fuddy le er that appeared on Scribd on 06/06/2012. The 4th electronic page isthe Tepper page 4, LFCOLB. This four‐page document was filed in MS on 06/06/2012. 4. We really don’t know when the Tepper page 4 LFCOLB was created. 5. The paper copy of the one‐page Onaka to Tepper verifica on le er was dated 05/31/2012. 6. The electronic version, which is court document 35‐2, was created on 06/04/2012 and was lastmodified on 06/06/2012. This one‐page electronic document was filed in MS on 06/06/2012. I believe that the most likely scenario is that Tepper created a paper copy of his three‐page le er toFuddy on 05/26/2012. He a ached a paper printout copy of the original WH LFCOLB and mailed thisfour‐page paper copy to Fuddy. Tepper and Onaka then collaborated to alter the WH LFCOLB to create the Tepper page 4 LFCOLB. On 06/04/2012, Tepper created the documents 10513240131.pdf (same as 35‐1) and 35‐2. He then filed the two documents 35‐1 and 35‐2 in MS on 06/06/2012. We really don’t know the individual ac ons of either Tepper or Onaka with regards the modifica ons ofthe WH LFCOLB PDF image file to create the altered LFCOLB PDF image file. Onaka may have modifiedthe WH LFCOLB and then sent the altered PDF image to Tepper as a one‐page PDF image file. There is

Re: binder 11 ... - Yahoo! Mail http://us.mc1257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=12&filterBy=&...

1 of 3 12/4/2012 3:13 PM

nothing in his verifica on le er that indicates that he a ached this altered LFCOLB to his verifica onle er. However, his le er does refer to the LFCOLB copy that was purportedly a ached to the four‐pagerequest le er from Tepper to Fuddy. Alterna vely, Tepper might have had someone else modify the WH LFCOLB PDF image to create thealtered PDF image. That might explain why the METADATA was not en rely erased from his four‐pageelectronic document. We know that a scanner was used so Tepper’s forger would have had to havesome means of re‐sizing a scanned and altered image of the WH LFCOLB back to the correct size tomatch a real 1961 Cer ficate of Live Birth printed form. I am now certain that the 21 added objects which are invisible in Adobe Reader pre‐existed before06/04/2012 as a separate PDF image. The 21 objects include 12 line segements, 2 broad‐line strikeoutsand 7 Black redac on rectangles. This “redac on” page is smaller than the LFCOLB image page size. Ihave successfully separated this smaller “redac on” image from the fla ened and altered WH LFCOLBimage in both Adobe Illustrator CS6 and Inkscape. I have a ached my latest screenshots from AdobeIllustrator as proof. The screenshot [105132401131_ss3.jpg] a ached shows the “redac on” page slidoff the LFCOLB image page to the right. The background of the “redac on” page is transparent. So an alterna ve scenario would be that Tepper had his forger modify the WH LFCOLB and Onakaprovided the “redac on” image to assist Tepper’s forger re‐size his scanned image. This would lessenOnaka’s involvement with the crea on of the fraudulent LFCOLB Tepper page 4 LFCOLB. So scenario A would be that Onaka did the deed and scenario B would be that they collaborated to dothe deed. Either way they both are guilty of a emp ng to pull off a bait and switch on Judge Wingate. Theysubs tuted the Tepper page 4 LFCOLB for the WH LFCOLB and didn’t tell Judge Wingate about theswitch. I can provide a notarized copy of my sworn affidavit whenever you need it. Also, I can provide any of myscreen shots as required. I would prefer not to tes fy because of personal reasons. I also believe that. ifI were to tes fy, then I would quickly become a “punching bag” for the defense because I don’t have anIT cer ficate and I have never tes fied as a forensic expert. Sincerely, Henry From: Paul IreySent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 5:54 AMTo: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]: binder 11 ...

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7763 (20121204)__________

Re: binder 11 ... - Yahoo! Mail http://us.mc1257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=12&filterBy=&...

2 of 3 12/4/2012 3:13 PM



Exhibit 3

Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.; 21948 / 2012

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICESTATE OF NEW YORK )

) ss.COUNTY OF ULSTER )

Accordingly, I, H. William Van Allen, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:

a. Am over 18 years of age and not a party to this action.b. My place of business is located at 351 North Road Hurley New York 12243.c. On November 14, 2012, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of the NOTICE OF

PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 13,2012 along with aNOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARYINJUNCTION PENDING A DECLARATORY INJUNCTION ON ISSUE OF LAW AS TO ELECTORSDECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS, a Notice of Petitioner's intent to file an order to show causeapplication at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 10 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street onMonday November 19,2012 placing a complete set in a properly addressed to each respondent listed below fordelivery by USPS by certified mail with request for return receipt for proof of service.

d. On November 14, 2012, I caused each copy with proper postage for service by certified mail on the listed Electors andwhere each envelope was properly addressed with the Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" and "PERSONAL &CONFIDENTIAL" in the lower left hand corner of the envelop that was then deposited with the USPS for service upon:

1. Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 112382. Grace Meng ofl47l4 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 113543. Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 112324. Bill DeBlasio of 442 lith Street -- Brooklyn. NY 112155. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #[2G -- New York. NY 100256. Keith L.T. Wright of2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York. NY 100377. Christine C. Quinn of263 Ninth Avenue. #3A -- New York, NY 100018. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York. NY 100279. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street. #3A -- New York, NY 1002310. Emily Giske 01'440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 1001411. Anne Marie Anzaloue 2827 48th Street -- Astoria. NY 1110312. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, N'r' 1143313. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 1046614. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of820 Boyton Avenue. #6D -- Bronx. NY 1047315. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers. NY 1071016. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 1096217. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany. NY 1220818. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 1420819. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 1461020. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 1460921. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 1412722. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 1322423. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 1170424. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 1485025. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849;26. Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510

Sworn to before meThis i day of November 2012

~<-Drl Q ~k.o-~tary Pubhc

CM I RR No 7012101000068749741CM I RR No 7012101000068749819CM I RR No 7012101000068749758CM I RR No 7012101000068749765CM I RR No 7012101000068749956CM I RR No 7012101000068749826CM I RR No 7012101000068749833CM IRR No 7012101000068749840CM I RR No 7012101000068749857CM I RR No 7012101000068749864CM I RR No 7012101000068749901CM IRR No 7012101000068750242CM I RR No 7012101000068749963CM I RR No 7012101000068749796CM I RR No 7012101000068749949CM I RR No 7012101000068749895CM I RR No 7012101000068749970CM I RR No 7012101000068749802CM IRR No 7012101000068749772CM I RR No 7012101000068749789CM I RR No 7012101000068749871CM I RR No 7012101000068749888CM I RR No 7012101000068749918CM I RR No 7012101 000068749925CM I RR No 7012101000068749932

C"!Rl'N~':'00006R7499R7

/#~/;l.v~2r;;/rlliam Van Allen ~

JUDITHS.MA YHONNOTARYPUBUC, STAT£; OF NEW YORK

NO.01MA60B5585QUALIFIED IN ULSTER COUNTY/'(j

COMMISSION EXPIRES JUt Y 14, 20__

Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 W S S C for Kings county Index No.; 21 948 / 2012 0 , - AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.

TY OF KINGS )

Aecordingly, I, I Rou&e efi ALL being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of pe jury:

over 18 years of age a n d no t a party t o t h i s action. 6J5 f/& K 1 1 ZoG place of bus iness i s located at November 30 ,2012 , Christopher S t runk instructed m e t o serve a true conformed copy of t he PETITIONER'S

-- >OND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF OSC with EXHIBITS annexed AFFIRMED November 30,2012 along with a copy of t he NOTICE OF PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 1 3 , 2 0 1 2 placing a complete s e t i n a properly addressed envelope to e ach respondent listed below for delivery by USPS regular mail.

d. O n November 30 ,2012 , I caused each copy with proper postage for service by first c lass mail o n t h e listed Electors And where each envelope was properly addressed with t h e Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" a n d PERSONAL 8a CONFIDENTJAL" i n t he lower left h a n d c o m e r of the envelop t h a t w a s then deposited with the USPS for service upon:

1. Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 2. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 3. George Gresham 13 13 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 4. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 5. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 6. Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 7. Hakeern Jeffi-ies 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 8. Bill DeBlasio of442 1 lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 9. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 146 10 10. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 11. Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 12. Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025 13. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 14. Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York,,NY 10002 15. Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037 16. Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001 17. William Thompson of 106 West 12 1 st Street -- New York, NY 10027 18. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023 19. Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014 20. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 -

21. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 22. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 23. Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11 103 24. Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 25. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 26. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 27. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 28. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849 29. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710 30. Joshua Pepper NYSAssiatant Attorney General Office of Attorney General 120 Broadway NY NY 10171

31 K L Q ~ T V CrfCtVrc/@(l VtWQ $ f = f = I C @ r L E q B E ~ ~ S ~ L ~ W H Wmy18

KAMAL P. SON1 Notary Public, State of New York

No. 01 SO6089949

: ., Qualified in Kings C0unly Commission Expires March 31. 201 5



Exhibit 4

-QUEST FOR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION" UCS-840 (31201 1)

Supreme COURT, COUNTY OF Kings

&V. rc/ 2012 Index No: 2 1 ?* Zo(a Date Index Issued:

I B Y m o n e n . against-

For Court Clerk Use Only: IAS tntry Uate

- JuageAssigned

CAPTION: Enter the complete case caption. Do notuse et a1 or et am. If mae space is required, attach a caption nder sheet.

KJI Uate

- -

H~,<C?G&'I J C F * ~ ~ , G/~ALC mgNG, BILL DEBWSa,uvryEZ

ICe~yfl b a T d VfltGc+s, CHRLTT~NE C d u ~ u l j W ~ L U P M 7kn.,mahl, seun J ~ ~ , ~ G ~ ~ ~ c m ( c y GJSICE, PUPIF )MANE ~ru&ddWt?, -)+&c,-rrG S R G N G R & w s k ~ ~ - e l y

f RVDIN D f ~ 2 J Q . , ~ A ~ L C U CrLFWaf - & A J , ~ - 199- B M * ) ~ 2

1266'- Wf-py, J o ~ n u s-~t~/yrq;repp~~~ n ~ . ~ . l r n ~ S ? F ~ ;E W K ~ r ;

I=& ~ W N 54GcW W P l ( l f i - m W ~ t ~ ~ / p p , ~ Q p o Dhnch@$l~ea;bfnIent(s)

% ,, . . . , *. - ? ' . - - ,

NATURE OF ACTION 'OR-~OCEE~ING:" : Check.ONEbox-only andspecifywh6re iniicated. ' ' ' , ' - ;3=, C" .-

Is this adionlproceedrng being filed post-judgment? 0 @ If yes, judgment date:

MATRIMONIAL 0 Contested 0 Uncontested

NOTE: For all Matrimonial actions where the parties have children under the age of 18, complete and attach the MATRIMONIAL RJI Addendum.

TORTS 0 Asbestos 0 Breast Implant 0 Enmmental :

(SPem)

0 Medical, Dental, or Pediatric Malpractice 0 Motor Vehlde 0 products ~sbility.

(~PeclfY)

0 Other Neglglrgence: (specrty)

0 Other Profess~onal Malpractice: ( s a w )

0 Other Tort (~pec~ty)

OTHER MATTERS SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS Certmcate of lncorporat~onlDissolut~on [see NOTE under Commerctal] 0 CPLR Article 75 (Arbltrat~on) [see NOTE under Commercial]

0 Emergency Medical Treatment CPLR Artlcle 78 (Body or Officer)

COMMERCIAL 3 2:; -

0 Buslness Ent~ty (including corporations, partnerships, L*S, et 0 Contract d-- z r 0 Insurance (where Insurer is a party, except arbitration)= m 0 ucc (including sales, negotiable instruments) C a3 ?- 0 Other Commercial: a

(tpecity)

NOTE: For Commercial Div~sion assignment requests 122 NYCRR 5 202.70(d)]. complete and attach the COMMERCIAL DIV RJI Addendum.

REAL PROPERTY: Haw many pmperbes does the application include? 0 Condemnat~on 0 Foreclosure property Address:

S m Address CW State Zip

NOTE: For Foreclosure actions invdvlng a one- to four-family, omer- occupied, residential property, or an owner-occupied condominium, '

complete and attach the FORECLOSURE RJI Addendum. 0 Tax Certiorari - Section: Block: Lot: 0 Other Real Properly:

(~peclty)

0 Habeas Corpus 0 Local Court Appeal 0 Mechanic's Lien 0 Name Change 0 Pistol Perrn~t Revocation Heanng 0 Sale or Finance of ReligiouslNot-for-Profit Property

0- (spadfy)

9 ~lect ion Law 0 MHL Article 9.60 (Kendra's Law)

0 MHL Arbcle 10 (Sex Offender Confinement-initial) 0 MHL Article 10 (Sex Offender Confinement-Rewew) 0 MHL Article 81 (Guardianship) 0 Other Mental Hygiene:

( ~ W l t y )

0 Other Special ?peeding: -/ . bpeuty)

STAfus <X ACTION OR.PROCCE~INU: ' . .Answer YES or NO for EVERY q&&on ~ ~ b e n t e i additional iiformation where indcafed I YES I NO

Has a summons and complaint or suhmons wlnotice been filed? 8) 0 ' I f yes, date filed: l2

ClAL INTERVENTION: Cheek ONE box onlyAND ~rdtl'iiljnformation where indicated. nfmr's Cornwmtse

0 Note of Issue and/or Certificate of Readiness 0 Nobe of h4tdical. Dental. or Pediatric Malpractice Date lssue Joined:

0 Nobce df Motion Relief Sought: Return Date: 0 N o w of Petition Relief Sought: Return Date:

=order to show cause Relief Sought: m o . wf/% /PJ"paH pm. Return Date: 9 % 6 L z 0 Other Ex Parte Application Relief Sought: A@=. 0 Poor Persora Application 0 Request for Preliminary Conference 0 Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Settlement Conference 0 Wnt d Habeas Corpus

0 - (sPeafY):

RUATEDCASES: List any re latedact i : Fm IGl-Mlial actions, k;elude&y-m4ated'~drninal andhx Famlly Court cases. - , ; . ;- , , ,-. If additional space is-required, complek and attach the R31 Addendum. %Ifmorre.'leave blank.

. - " C L - T - . z 7 e 2 - - Case Tile

S%WM~ Cf. wvfl ,krcr r k~ &%"lr36fl

%PI< v PYSBO Y

Court

Kt@J-svf LC

1 1 .

IndexlCase No.

296' f f -

- z,EcjB 'I-q by E

Z ~ I - a a a

PARTIES: 'If addifionalspace isrequired, complete andattach the.RJMW.@dwi'. , & L A ; ;J , ; . : - , : - A- . S. ." , ,*$ *- . ' <'$ -$,' s'-.c - ? * l h 4 For partieswthout an attorney, check"UnlRep- box AND entecparly address, Mane"Tiumberand&ailld&lrss&4n * ~ t t k ~ =$ace. . . ..-

Judge (if assigned)

S ~ H ~ L Q ~ J S C

1 I!

Y C H ~ ~ C ~ C -I sc

Relationship to Instant Case

r r - + - e 8 ~ m i e 4 mL-na& C J R ~ e r J

k c rc L/F 2 m ~ ~ C T ( 6 ~

CG am - RP- 1 2 - s x -

Un- Rep

Parties: L~st parties in caption order and Indicate pa* role(s) (e.g 3rd-party plaintiff).

'%U@It; last Name

CMA IS ~9P-r Wk.

Attorneys:

Provide name, firm name, business address, phone number and e-mail address of all attorneys that have appeared in the case.

, 5Tg l / rJ lK Last Name

~,4&s7A@-H3C- LgPC Flrst Name

~tlp - tv?NTt" - Finn N me F ~ n t Name

NO

lssue Joined (YIN):

DYES Primary Role:

Secondary Rde (tf any):

& ~ ~ = F K I 6 LastNan?

Insurance Carrier(s):

37 vw-3 We Bmq$d - i t Stred Address c b Stste

BW-QOL-~TA Phone 7 Fax - ~ f i R o r ~ z ~ @ emall

hat Name Mllms

THERE ARE AMD

D

I AFFIRM HAVE BEEN NO RELATED ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS, NOR H UDfClAL m Y BEB( FILED IN THIS ACTION OR PROCEEDING.

Dated: ( 0 /&, mlz- 22%- SIGNATURE ~ F - R G ~ x ~ ~ M M FE cfie (c~wjq px ac +* h d < F ~ E

ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NUMBER PRINT OR TYPE NAME '..

M&E-J F i i Name

pnnurV Rob: - p e r . Sacaday Role (if any):

Last Name

Fbdllar* Rimay Role:

secondary Rob (if any):

L.rt Name

Flmt N a m Primary Role:

Secondary Role (It any):

UNDER THE PENALTY OF

YES

Finn Name

Stmt A d d m cftr st.b,

Phone Fax d

LatHrru Fhtltrac

Rml lm

Street Mdron car - Phane k d

hst Name FiP'

OW

OYES

om,

Fkmthm

S W Address ctr &

Phone Fax .J

OW PERJURY THAT, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, OTHER THAN AS MUTED Asov+



Exhibit 5

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit E

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit F

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit G

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS

Christopher Earl Strunk in esse

Petitioner

v.

1. Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 2. Bill DeBlasio of 442 11th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 3. Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 4. Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 5. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 122086. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 104667. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 8. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 9. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 10. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 1460911. Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 12. Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 1002513. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 1002514. Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York, NY 1000215. Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037 16. Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 1000117. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 18. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023 19. Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014 20. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 1412721. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 22. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 23. Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103 24. Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 1135425. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 26. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 27. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 28. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849 29. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710

Respondents

NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ARTICLE 78 PETITION WITH AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING A

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS

Please take notice of Petitioner’s intent to file an order to show cause application at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 11 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on Monday November 19, 2012 for a preliminary injunction relief pending a declaratory judgment on issues of law; e.g., Are public officers to be held liable as accessories to felonies in usurpation of Office of POTUS and Ballot access? Are public officers presented with the facts of Barack Obama ineligibility able to change qualifications before the Electoral College Vote scheduled December 15, 2012?

For further information Contact :

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281

Brooklyn New York 11238 Cellphone: 845-901-6767 Email: [email protected]


Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of OSC

Exhibit 2

120 BROADWAY, NEW YORK N.Y. 10271-0332 • PHONE (212) 416-8610 • FAX (212) 416-6075 *NOT FOR SERVICE OF PAPERS HTTP://WWW.AG.NY.GOV

STATE OF NEW YORK

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN ATTORNEY GENERAL

KENT T. STAUFFER EXECUTIVE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

DIVISION OF STATE COUNSEL

LISA R. DELL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL IN CHARGE

LITIGATION BUREAU

November 16, 2012

Clerk of Court Supreme Court, Kings County 360 Adams Street Brooklyn, NY 11201 Re: Christopher Earl Strunk Dear Sir or Madam:

I write because Christopher Earl Strunk has stated in the attached that he intends to file an Order To Show Cause against, inter alia, Governor Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, and Comptroller Tom DiNapoli, regarding their casting votes at the Electoral College for President Barak Obama. The attached Order enjoins Mr. Strunk from filing any further actions in the Unified Court System against any of these three people. Moreover, the subject matter of Mr. Strunk’s threatened new litigation is precisely the same as that of the previous litigation that resulted in the attached Order. Thus, Mr. Strunk should not be permitted to file his Order To Show Cause.

Respectfully submitted, Joshua Pepper Assistant Attorney General



Exhibit 3



Exhibit 4

SUPRE= ZOURT OF THE STATE OF hTbl IORX

COUNTY OF KINGS - CIVIL TEXM: 9 X T : 1

CHaISTOPHER STRUN?, I?!D. NO.

-3qa -35~- 29641/08

DAVID A . FATERSON(NYS COV?!?OR), MJDREW CUOMOIYYS

ATYORNEY C-PNSPAL), DEQX SX5LOS [PRESIDENT ?RO

TEMPOOR OF THE NYS SEN':? PAD IN LINZ TO SUCCSZD THE

GCVER);OR), TN0W.S ? . U1rJ:iOLI !NYS COMPTROLLER), .WD

LORRAINE A . CORTEZ-VASCUZZ !SECRLT?RY OF TY.E STAlE

3 F NE:v YORK: , , Defendants.

. . . . . - - - - - . . . . . . - . - - - x 360 Adarns Street Brooklyn, New York 11201

A P P E A R A N C S S :

ZHRISTC?ER STiUN? Appear-ng I r o Se

OFFICE OF T 5 'Fr-TORKEY GENERRL 120 Brcadway New York, New York 10271-3332 Assistant Rttornev General BY : JOEL G Z E R , ZSQ Deputy Attcrrey General BY: LZOTIAXD -2. COiEN, ESQ

;ennie ?antasla, Senlor COUI: Reporter

?ROCX:DINGS

Legislature.

NOW, as Par as pay, there 1s a rpes:lon of

shether rt's dlmlnlmous. The pay was, when

rhsy rewrote che elecrlon law In tne 7C's,

;my carried over C?.P same amount of vaney

:hat was previously ~ a l d ln the 60's.

Now I worked as a soda lerk for one collar

an hour, mlnlmurr ?ay, and certainly Sl5 an hoLr

16 rwice m:nlmum paj- so that's pore d ~ n l n ~ m a ~ s

:r terms of 1960, '62.

The questlon of belng a federal officer

urder the Federal Zo-atltutlon, rrhlch 1s In

Frticlf tko, secr-an one, clause two, whlcn

can be found In the xernoranda 05 law on paze

ihree, on page tcree of -- four of fLoe o?

tne bacc, all the way ~n tt.e back on rhe

nemorandum cf lati, a11 the way Ir the back,

four of floe, f o ~ r of i~ve, states tnz; :he

Crzted States Corszltutlon, Ertlcle zuo,

section sne, clause rwo, each state 572-1

aspoirt I n such --

THE COURT: K-ere are you?

m. STRUNK: E-ght here.

IIndlcatlng.)

MR. STRLNK: Xzcn Stare shall apao;li lr.

THE CLERK: I?der rimer 29541 of '06,

C-q-rlstopher Ezrl S~ru?< agalnsr Davld .A.

Patterson, et a-.

kX. CRD4B;R: Joel Graber, Assis:ant

Artorney General. Specral Llrrgazlan Cowsel,

Llslgatlon Bureau. 120 Brnadxay, New York New

York.

:Q. COHEN: Leorard A Cohen, Cep~ry

2:rorney General, Jlv~slor of Stare Co~nsel,

120 6roadway.

THE i3UP.T: Yod made the moxlon, now

- - -alk.

M 3 . STRUNK: You naa tankea me ro ansier

what a publrc oif~c?r wzs . The Zblls

Officer's Lxd, 1- fa=:, coes exclldf -- State

Prblrc Off~ce Lair does excldde :he e1ecrora:e

ccce they're elscyed fro7 the -- fror. n a a g a

pmlic offlcer.

That's also -- Me agreed rhel's rhe case.

The fact though ;s :cat orce they're eleczed

and iney're certlled on, I rhlnk. Decerber

lsc, :ney7re federal officers urder tre Feceral

Conscltutlon, they are holding a federa ]cb

for conpe-satio~ p a d for by the S:a:e

a manner as the 1egrjlat;re thereof may drrect

a n d e r cf elecrcrs equal ra the whole n~rber

05 SenatOrs and representar:ves to whlch the

State nay oe ertlrlehr- Congress, bu: no

senator sr representat-ve ;r ;ersm, uhlcn

I'n saying rs an elecroraye once chey've been

certlflea and 1s necomes federal cff~cers,

-cldlng an offlce of trus: cr prof~t -ndsr

c>.e Unrtea Sta:es ar.d thry'ra gerring pa;a by

cne Stare $:5 p e r aler shall be appnlr~ed an

elector.

T5ey are a -- b,is 1s a11 carried over

fror. tne 60's on :he dlmlnrnois q-estlon

,aten c?ey rewrote rhe lau 11- rhe 713's and zhar

there are a ser:eI of const:t;t:ona_ cases

regarding tne relstl-nshlp of party ~rvolve~ent

to State, publlc lrterest and Sraie acrron.

Tnat belrg s h n r r e d 1444 In whlch the

Jaynlrd Democra~lc ?zrry as a select rnsider's

gcouc .*ere flxlng :he process cf ~ h o ende3 up

to be candidates In :he prlnary so they were

excl~dlng others.

In 1953, again tce Jaybirc Democratic

Parry was, -,ha;'s exhibit number 11, <.,as held

E-ac r l e y ~ m l c not, =hey .cad to haire en open

prlmary, they had :o not have the lnner clrcle

of the party control that whlch tr.e people

themselves were belrg excl~ded from In terrs of

cornpe:lng for the xternal pcs~trons.

k d char's wka: has oeen carrred forward

In SLaLe Law In thar the Inner clrcles have

controlled :he Elec~3raL Cc__ege.

It's change"? the prlnary. The

people, the com.on nan iyrc are party

memers, run on 2 C3 by C3 oasis, delegates

at the convention and :he party 1-slders

take over to control che voie. Btcause they

are, lt's to thelr oeneflt to control ~t

because they have rhz most LO galr by

patracage, by bei?a cn the lnslder to

vote whoever they've agreed to vote for

no matter whai ar.a rha r :nose who are on

the outslde wco c a r ' = gci on the l n s l d e who

were In t-e prlrnarles, who wen: to the

ccnventlor, wno d;d cast thelr votes, they

are not allowed co parzlclpate.

So I'n c31~,pz:i?g -1 10 rhe Jaybird

Dernocratlc Party l? Lhis case ln 1453. It's

exclusionary. It's a vlolatlon of equal

prote3:lon for parry me~rbers as an

*no sorked wlrh 2% who was the SEC boss

rfcer Jasepn Kenredy, cerrainly u-derstood

2nd sroflred ln pcl?p into chat wrole prozess

lr. 1933 -hen :he Securlty Xxchange C o m l s s ~ o r

was set up.

He, In a concxrrence rn Barer v. Carr

made a very, mporraxi presentation wh~ch

3r1n2s the 1ssLes tha: 1'7 reffrrlny ro lrto

sons~derzrlon or. tna qest-on 0 5 po11c~ca1

quesrlons and wksrcer or noc rhe Cour: can

Inceruene.

a d , rn other words, li the Court

can't .nternene on s~meL!llnq 2s importart as

eleccron law, rhls LS like -- e-ezt~o. _ad

1s diiierexr tnzli s-rrlrc In the 3ack of ; bus

and zerca~nly th;: 1s the 'undarnercal thai we

are mcvlnj ahead on.

Znd certa~rly notwltrstazdlng wh;:

Church-ll had :o say ,when ke sald you

meashre daaocracy based Leon z ten n::~Jte

ccnversat~an wirh an .%ner~can, zrzt's our

ec-~catlon system.

You can't blb-e the fact that we have

ar. ed~cat;cn systen! W~LCP. 'woulir almost prox~t

rre lnner clrcle, the Jayblrd sorr of ?arty

asscclatlon.

There 1s two ;lasses =:chin the parry

SirCCture. ?ria chat so, :iz:'s tbe

corsldera~lo- wrlch I thlnZ 1s ex:remely

rnporran: ro brlry us u3 ln:o rhe 21s:

century and :n r?.e same way as the per alem

woula be Dro~grt ~ p .

1 m a n z luror, you askea me to ansder, 1

:he ]ur3r a ?ubllc offlcerl I say

ccequrvoca-ly aoso-~cel) nor.

The -hole process of a lury, of

c'eck~ny excesses of goverment, 1s :3

make sure rbat t'e cltrrec ;s the chezk

against excesses ana overreaching by publrc

officers. ur the point tnat a liror becomes

a publlc offlcer, we're In deep trouole.

So ;ertarnly lury nu1l;iica:lon :s 1

serlcus o:.golzg problem, b ~ r you asked me

if I rho~qht a ILror has 1 pual~c offlser,

I say absolutely no:. It's agalrst the

fnndarnenrils of the Ccnstitjrlcn :u ever:

ccnslcer a lurcr as a pub:-c off:-er.

Turthsrnore, Justice Caujlas 'xho,

iltko-gh I don't a7ree wlth nany of the

things he d ~ d as a very klgh level mason

structure whlch as an autocncy and plutocracy

and controls publ-c ?o-icy from - -

THE COURT: WhaE statuze deals wlth ?.ow

the electors are elec~edl

!a. STRjNK: Ir, :he conventlcn or I n

cne -- this 1s elecrion law, speclfrcally. In

che prlnary procsss?

T3SCOURT: Zorqe: :he prlmary.

I*. STRUNK: Thzz's artrcle 12.

THE COURT: I? rhe rote for :he

president.

lm. STRUNK: Article 12. T h ~ y are

candidates.

THE COURT: F.r:lcle 12 of7

ER. STRUNK: The Elecrlal Lad.

THE COURT: 31g?:.

ELR. STRUNK: That they are seated under

12 -- 12-100, :he; ;re get::nj certlf~ed.

THE COURT: ho* are they p~cked?

Pa. S T 3 J N K : Tney are prcked by che --

at large. Thls 1 s a State - - we go from

a primary, whlch 1s a CD oy CD basis, and

at large basls wnlcn 31 electors are cnosen

ac Large so yo2 have no cholce :o say I don't

want that eleccor, cur I'll rake that elector.

It's wln:.er take all and we cave ro zko~ze

whatsoever w w r ite --

?HE COIT: Eow do y o ~ P I C ~ :re e-eciorsl

1.m. ST3.34K: Ac tne general elez:lon on

a general -- or. a ballot by party tka: tne

carty has tnelr eleccors slats. We aoce 'or

that and rkey nay vaze -- once they're elected

che ma]or~:y vote cones fro3 :he e1ec:or.

Once they Fer cerzl'led a-d gei I? tha; r o a n

CF December 15tk, they can vo:e for ilnoTne:,er

they hke. So ihai there :s no bargzils.

THE COURT: So, ~ r : o:her r~ofds, rhe

?o:ers or. electicn dsy vcce for che

elecrors.

13R. SIRii:<: For the elecior's slare,

yes.

THE COURT: Okay.

13R. STAWNK: B2t they h a e 7.0 cho~ce.

In oikr uords, rnose who ran In rhe ?rlnzry,

In a~her wards, :-sy're exclrded ena he

party lnslders tave 1t ovfr a;d chat's the

c;!rp,rlsor i am mzkrng to :he Jayalrd

Dfmocratx Par:y s:ruz:urs wnrch was found

by =hi %creme Courr co be a vlolarior of ihe

15 th 'menanent .

. - -., Jai~blrd?

>a. STR'JTIK: 1: $was bro~gh: by s --

reftrr~nc cn a negro 'later wlo wss of the

some party a-d trat 2% %as - - he uas saylng

that he was ~rabli t, put somebody or, ;he

ballcr otk,er tha?. rh? ins-ders who were ;cld

Ir '4: 10 5 ~ 3 p doxg ~ t .

rhls 1s the same party zomlng b;ck

nlne years later :o :ontime on ~ h l s sort

of inner sanz'.m of the pll;tocrazy whlch

contrcued ro pacK ;he ger-erai eLertran

b ~ l 1 0 ~ ~ .

Whether or n3r 3 Black man can be

1rc1,:ded LO vote I n z prlrary, ihzr's '41,

tt.ey &re prevecied from votlng even ;hob;h

they were Deaocracs.

THE COURT: Tke ouestlo: was whetner a

Black mar can %ate :c the prirary.

'43. STRUKX: In the prriary to wr.lch

k.e rs a rrenber a?.@ chat tzere was an inner

qrouplng wltnln tre party that were

ccntro1lp.q the overall d~rec:loc 3f the party

rl gexsra l .

THE COURT: I neard eFo;gh.

Nhat do ycu -aae to say?

THE COU3T: Ii was -- tne Jayblrd case

bas regardlng what, the prxary or regardlng

the general elecrron?

FIR. STRrJ4X: Regarding ine genera-

election.

They cortrolled the prlyary. They

controlled uto appeared on tre ballot -n

the general slectlon. T'ere was no process

that would allow camset;tlon and chat rhe

common party rrenoers were not allcweo to

conpete because 1: wzs all done on the

rnslde and then 3y rne tire, ln other words,

there was no~ody on the ballor i.>hlch was,

from a party standpoint, which was

representatLve of rhe vas: rna~orlty of the

common parry memers.

T%E COURT: Jaybird is the o7.e w.0 the

surt Has bro~ght a;arCs:?

m , ST3m6: Terry v . Adams rr! Texas.

Texas' a 3epurl-c and s~lll n l s the aalll~y

to secede. It's a Resublic const1;utlon a-d

it was, next to Georgia, the nost --

THE COURT: JUST a rnlnute. I'm stlll at

Jayblrd.

What was the la-dsu-r tnere, who brought

14R. GT-ER: Thznk you, Your Honor.

Nothlng I4r. Sirunl; has s a ~ d so far

ras anythlqg to 30 wlrh =he specla1

proceedings, wltk cie roilon :hat rs ~eiore

Your Honor.

The Fremlse of r'e -ot:an 1s that

electors are publlc officers and that for

those elecIors wic are p s l ~ c offlcers 1n

some other capacity. there 1s a conflrct of

interest as beiween rhelr rwo roles.

The problen wl;n thls premise 1 s that

~ t ' s false. ZlecIors are not publlc offlcers.

Sectlon two of the ?u!ollc Oif~cer's Law deflnes

who 1s a prblrc offrcer.

THE CC-mT: Z; Zgfeec to :hat. He sald

chat Ir excludes elecrors.

xowever, he :s polntlng Lo the Federal

Constrtutlon rr f o u r of flre of his mot103.

MR. G m i ? : Thaz's not the contentron

or thls rnotlon or 1- r h ~ s ~roceedlcgs as a

wt.ole as to wherher ihey're Federal Publlc

Officers. We haven't bzleied that because

lt isn't rn the r.or.ng papers.

m. STRINK: four iionor, I have it ln my

affidavit In s~ppor:.

PiOCET3INGS

Nay I read 1:)

THE COURT: >air a mlnure be fo re you read

I t .

Has any case d e a l t wrth what 1 s considered

an o f f l c e o r t r ; s r or p r a f l t ? What does i t

mean, an o f f l c e 3C EYEST o r p r o f l t ?

MR. STRWK: So~ebody who 1 s rn a

p o s l t l o n r o speak for rhe l n t e r e s t of i h e

Sza te o r f o r --

THE COURT: Wry d l d q ' t l t l u s t say

holdlng an office, 2ald:ng a pub l l c o f f l c e ?

wha t ' s an o f f ~ c e C ? t r u s t o r p z o f l t ? What

does l t mean?

No one has de:-ned t h a t eve r? Was

the re an; cormnen:ar:es a t rhe t;me they wrcie

I:?

B. STRLKX: 1 c a n ' t speak t o t n a t .

T3E COUXT: I doc': e-en know b a s i c a l l y

what l t neans pe r s e .

You're say;cc r n a r r c a t means any

of'icer of the S t a t e ,who z e t s Fa lo , bu: i

d o n ' t know tha: ~t neans t h a t .

T h a t ' s i h e n ~ u b e r one.

MR. STRWfi: 3u: i t ' s certainly i n a

p o s ~ t r o n of t r ~ s t , tn-y a r e -- a l t tough they

can vcce fo r whomever they l ~ k e , some

e l e c t o r s a r e unoer o n t r a c t t o vote

s p e c ~ f ~ c a 1 : y a s under san t racc wrth t h e

S ta re per s e .

P.s the S i a i e of Yew 'fork, t h e y ' r e not

ucder contract. There r z an e A e r e n t of t r ~ s t

because they are o a i l c a l l y p a r t y members.

k-~d alchough they z re S ra re officers a s d e l l

zs a pa r ty rnenber, Yrrs ;s a system run ~y the

i ~ o malo= p a r t l e s .

THE COURT: I Lmcerstand t h a t . So binat

do you have t o say abou: =hat '

!fR. GRRBER: : r T s not a pos r t lon of

t r u s t wlth r e spec t :c ch t people a s a dn3le

because the e l e c t o r s a r e d e s ~ g n a t e d ~y

cand lda tes .

m d l n c o m e c i l o r w- t t t he p r lna ry t h a t

was he ld r?. Sepzember. =he var-ous

p r e s l d e n t l a l caz3ldares deslgnated s l a t e s

of e l e c t o r s who wire gcing t o represent tnem

I n the New York i l e c r o r a l 15 t h a r candldare

should prevail I n the prlrnary.

T h a t ' s the source of ~ h e de-egates .

Tne deslgnaied e l e c t o r s i n rhe case of

:he Dercocrats, S fn i io r Obama, r t ' s 32

persons, me-mbers of :,e p'ubllc thac he

deslgnated a s e -ec io r s .

TXE CCUXT: Iie. S e r a r o r 14cCam has

different elez:ors.

MR. G : i B E R : Yss, acd Zhz orher

candrdates th;: s r e gs;ng r o oe on tne

b a l l o t tona r ros hcne c h t l r awn deslgnated

e l e c t o r s .

MR. STRLNK: \1j rebr::al t o t h a t ,

c e r t a l n i y l f yo^ can f ~ n c anybody who was

l c t h e o r l g l n i l p r lna ry s l a i e on tb.e a a l l o t .

I would agree u ~ t k rhe genrlenan except f o r

the f a c t these a r e ~ ? s i d e r s who have taken

ove r tne p rocess . They're not l ance r taken

forward from t h e prrmary. They a r e a

d l f f e r e n r s e t of zecple. : r ' s a b a r t and

swltch.

THE COURT: I 3 1: B different s e t 0'

people?

MR. C?ABl?: hc, r t ' s xo:, Your Eonor.

i t ' s f o r t n e c a n d l a ~ r i z , t - e prlmary,

p r e s l d e n t l a l primary cand lda tes desrgnsze

t h e r r e l e c t o r s and rrhat rh-y have before

YOLT Honor t h l s norrrng a r e t h e e l e c t o r s who

were des lgna te3 by i5.e can31dates who

?RCCZSDINCS

prevailed rn :heir respectrve p a r t y

p r lmar les . The 31 e ~ e c t c r s deslgnated by

Senator Oham3 +re :he 31 e l e c r o r s t h a t we

a r e t a l k l n g about t h r s mornrng. They were

Senator Obarna's cr.o.ce and Obama *as the

Democra~rc v o t e r ' s ino lce l n Sep-,err$er.

MR. STRmTK: Yoir Xocor, t h e pa r ty

r u l e s r e a l l y a r e -- j-ou czn wr l t e and s t a t e

law based upor rhe ac rua l r u l e s of the part ;

and t h e r ~ l e s of ~ k e parLy a r e inconsistent

wlth the -- u1:h tha t SwltCh from hhoe'J€r

g e t s e l e c t e d r n r7.e prlrnary a.id dhc ends up

I n t o t h e f m a l sl;:e 3f cand ida tes .

THE COURT: I :hLnk ~ a s i z a l l y t h e r e are

th ree po ln r s you're ms<:ng, okay.

One p e n t 1 s 1%: t h e r e 1 s a conflict.

The o the r pox : rs rha r t h e y ' r e p l b l l c

. - o r r l c e r s azd t t e r s 5 o r s they car . ' t nave tiio

o f f l c e s . .nmd rre t r l r d polzr 1 s t h a t :t.ere r s a

b a l t and s*rl tcn.

I s t h a t c , rrect?

PR. STRUNK: Yes, Your Honor.

T3E COURT: Jusr a m n ~ t e .

MR. STRW: Sc --

PROCEEDINGS

TIE COLRT: Ley's a s su re t h i r tt.ere 1s

a confilc:. Eoes 1: say anywhere ~ h - c

r c a t c3nfl:ct p r o h ~ o ~ t s hl? from v o i l - g ?

Pnere does .t say char :?ir pers jn

u l t h a c o n e l i c t c;?': vote?

- ~ note chat rnere a r e o t h e r cases

i l t t . cunf l - c t s , 31t I 'm sure t h a r :t dea l s

wlrh some s o r t of lak. wtere does l t jay

r t a t a person w l r t a c c n f l l c t c a n ' t - ~ e t e ?

I*, S T a m : :ne problem c o l t s :r tnac

wia a r e they voclng f o r .

I n o:her words, acr,ebouy becomes a

Denocrat per sf so ~ h z t they can d o t i l n :.Ie

-.rlmary. ;nd r h a t l e ' s the malor-ty pa r ry

as e S t a t e f u n c ~ l c n since t ? e y ' r e con:rol.ng

t ?e Gs-,.errment t h a t put forward tire s l a t e .

THE COURT: l o l ' r e 3lx.ng :he argune-rs

a g a l r . Tnere 1 s th ree , may32 f a ~ r ~ o s s l b l e

a rgmenEi .

m e , ;here ;s z c o n f l l c t . I p r s s sea you

c r che c o n f l l c t .

The orner cne 1s tha: :ns Staye L a w

s t a t e s you c a n ' t r.a.Je -- hold tllo p r S l l c

offices.

The e h ~ r d one 1s IC was a b a l t an0

a s s m e t h e r e 1 s z c o n f l l c t a2 you say.

:GI. STRWvA: :he quesclon of pub._c

policy, 11 rhe same way, ~ r ' s spec l f l ca - ly

s n g l e d o u t , tha; a no5ary cannot notax:ze

his 3%- s i g n a t u r e .

T3E COURT: I: says t y a no ta ry ,

c a e s n ' t s ay ~t anjplace e l s e . Ard

obvi3usly l f they say t h a t you co-id c e r t l f y ,

tben they :ouldn't p r o h i b : ~ s , nayte they

p r s h l b ~ t by a no:ary and d - d n ' t p r o h ~ b i r rn

e l e c r l o n law.

m. STEmIK: I t ,hloulc oe an ~ n t e r p r e t a t i o -

of the law a s --

THE CCURT: I uncerscand t h a t .

Then m e o the r argument aaouL t h e

Jayb i rd , lf t-,ey = a r appolr: whoever t n e .

f e e l l l k e , eazh Stace appolnrs a z 3 e a c n

legislator may d l r e c r so t h e r c nay not

have t o be an ele=:.on a s :o the electors,

211 t r e y nave z o aa i s appa ln r .

;h:s i o ~ l d be seeT t o s 1 m l a r t o the

Lcpei Torres case 1- whlci rhey ~ r ~ e d t o

knock o c t t h e .day chey prcked Srpreme CeLrr

Justices I? whlcn the Courr i;a:ed they

d 3 n T t understa-d \.)cat t h e argumenr i s , ~f

swrtzh I n ;he se?.se t h a t rhe ~ e o p l e who

were e l ec red c r l q l c a l l y a r e cor 7r.e same

~ 0 0 ~ 1 5 a n 3 1 t 1,lola:es tne Sunrene C o , ~ r t

of UFl ted SLates Jaybird case. T-a;'s t'he

e n l r ? one.

l e u pos;~bl>- have a foc r rh oce, cnac

e l e c i o r s c a n ' t be, according co ir.2 Fcaer-1

C o n s t l t ~ t l o n , czn c e somecre #ha r-olds an

o i i l l e . T h a r ' s czs.cally .r.

T n a r ' s proozbly -- ~ r ' s srm;-ar t o

tt.e a rg~me- r tFar rh? Staz r Law doisn'r

al low. T - a t ' s w e r e I see y o ~ r argument.

Who says t h e r e r s a conf l~c : , ,r c a n ' t

be done?

L e t ' s assume, I see 11 - n? r e zi

r z l n i s r e r l a l . L e t ' s say ~ t ' s a Republican

dho has t o cer::iy he eiecc;m r e s c l c s of

2 Jemocrar. L e r ' s a55um2 :hat f o r a a ~ ~ - . ~ c e .

Tners rs s confllz:. k r ' s s ay t n e r e was

o x .

K R . ST3IJNK: Xe i r e o r t h e second

q-esclon, iie a r e on r 3 the q ~ e s t i o ? . of

wtecher o r not somebody whc r s an e l ecce r zan

c s r t l f y h m s e l f .

THE COURT: Wco says ne can t ? L2:'s

you can 3 lck h i r , l f t he p a r t y l eade r can

plck r t 'directly, :hen why c a n ' t they make

the e l e c t l o n I n a <day th3: they want.

SO, I'n doin ro your l a s t argumect

whlct we a r e t a l k l n g zbour 1 s t h a t no

sena to r 3r rewresencizlve o r person holdrzg

an o f f -ce of t r o s i 02 pr3f11 c r d e r the Unrted

S t a t e s sha l - be ;ppol:tei an e l e c t o r .

!?I. GP.fi3ER: 1:'s 33: c l e a r t o us hox a

$ r a t e Publlc O f f ~ c e r 1 s s person holding

an o f f l c e of t r u s c or p r a f l c ~ n d e r the

J n l t e d S t a r e s . T ra t sounds l l k e the

d e f l n l t ~ o ~ of a f e a e r a l officer r a t h e r then a

s z a t e pub l rc of51zer, Your Honor.

1%. ST3m:<: The governor se rves a s t h e

Comander I n C h e f of =he S ~ a c e r u l l t a r y .

THE COURT: NO: when the Naclonal Guard

1 s f ede ra l i zed , he d o e s n ' t .

kE. STRIJNK: Neil --

THE COURT: Jusr a m l r . ~ t e .

YOU know I DWY t- at argument. I t s ays ,

l t says o f f i c e of :rust o r p r o f l t m d e r the

Unlted S t a t e s . ?he governor does riot se rve

a s t h e o f f l c e r of t r ~ s t o r p r o f r t under t h e

U n ~ t e d S t a t e s . >r~d 5 0 chis fede ra l rhlng

b:o'.lC Po: o~tlaw lt 30 the questLon here

15, y m steied tleri 1 s lr :ne S:ate

Co35t:cut:o~ thi: yo2 can't hold :wo pdblic

cfflces.

l a . ST3UWK: In the leglilarlve secrlo?

c: artlcle t-ree of cne State Co:.stltatlor,

spec~!i=ally, an2 then uncer artrcle 13

hklCh --

7dE COmT: YOU iant to show ir :o mi.

tm. x x n m : zes .

I Pas?. )

. - 1. i . S7R-JqK: 7h:s is :he leg~slGtrve

portlo?.

On tte follo.%~nq page ~ n d e r artlcle 13,

sever in regards ro shall have been elesred

r.or shall he cr ske oe peld 3r receive, or

the third l ~ n e , any ozher extra cornpensailon

wh~ch goes to what --

T3i COURT: Where 1s :hs next or;?

?%. YPRmT<: Naxt page over. iilghr

kere.

i1nd:catlng.l

THZ CCURT: Selirer -- okay.

?R, STRCnlK: Tne pub:-c 3 f lcer iihlcr.

would cover rhe governor.

TriE COURT: I Icn't knou wcat you're

referring to. Nelther the salary --

a. STRWL: Yes.

i?ausi. I

I.a. STRUNK: As a federal, z s a federal

offlcer, :he elecror ;s pala, the Coverment

would be -- the qovernor would be pald and

~ t ' s in yrolatron of that specri;cally

because he's recelvlng money that he houldn'c

nornally be gettlcg as part of h ~ s governor's

lob, whetner it be 2 dollar, dlmrlmous, or

2008 per dlern.

YHT COURT: Okay.

:n. C-mER: Thz electors are not

recelvlng the 515 as publlc offrcers

beta-se the Publlc Off~cers Law srates that

they're not publlc oiilcers. Trey are

rece:vlnq the money solely as eleclors.

So ~t can't lrnpllcate any provision of the

S:ate Carst-t~tlor pertarnrng to plbllc

officers.

When article i5.ree. sectlcn seven,

article three bexng ice 1eg;slaturs article

of rhe Scate Ccnst-r~tion, that -e!rberz of

tte leg-slaturt can': be appoir~ed to any

ocher office which 2-tall% compe-sation, lt

doesrt concern the scatus of electors because

elector 15 not a public office.

.:-n.d, of course, the second zolr:, the $15

doesn'c ionstltute legally cognizable

compensation. It's i~minrmous.

m. STR-UXK: Wtzre artlcle 12 of che

Electlon Law ceals 'dleh afLer -- Defore

and afrer they've been certrfled, so 1:'s

deallcg wzrh the quesrron of the oehavror and

tne jab 05 =he cer:~f;ed elector as a federal

offlcel aL thi: pox: whlch the

co~~ptrolle~ says ho.~ ~ u c h ihey'ri to be

pald anc ihe Secrerary Of State cerclfles ihac.

Trat's 110.

So thls 1s tP.e State paylng the elector

who 1s covere3 as a federal ofiicer a: thai

polnc, rhe payment ci zoney. 1:'s dlgitaied.

It's a pass off from ihe Siate ro the

offlclal pcsltlon a' the federal - as the

assem3lage of the Electoral College which

1 s przsected to ibc 1suse.

TdE COURT: Whzr else?

Is ic Lmparzzn: char tnrs rnz7.g be done

aefore the electlo?. :hac I have :o rake 2

declslon sefore the electlon or can tnis be

rnade afLer tne elrcrlcn?

YR. STSlmK: Well, certainly the questlon

as to whet5er cr no: rhe governor -- ~t goes

to the Jayblrd par:! z.;uarron.

General pubilc, I rr-ed ro get che

legislator Ilsr. They nave tnfse lnslcers

publlrh adcresses, 'relr rome addressel,

t:?ey aldn'r .da-t :o ?u311si- ~t and make :t

avarlable to rce gsreral publlc, we dozt

know who we're oorrng --

THE COURT: My questlon ls, d3es it

have to be done before the electlon? That's

the questron.

%, STR-UbM: Trere shculd have been --

aosolutely, the electicn's halfway over.

It's absenyee aa-lo: :or :wo weeks.

THE COURT: CEn :?is be decrdec before

the elector's voce or coes xt have to ae done

today?

CIP. STRmJK: :c sroui be ceclded row.

T2E COURT: Xhy?

m . STImJK: Because tne general

popu-at~on should know who rne electors

are.

I

I n p revmus e l e c t l o r s . they vcted fo r

the s l a t e of =. lectors . k .d 1 t IS abso lu te ly

not t h e case tha: - ~t 15 a salt and s w ~ t c h

abso l - t e ly . To r h h k :hat i h e y ' r e va t lng

f o r KcCaln o r Elasn, Lhey're no t , 1r. f a c t

I t 1 s abso lu r i l - : m l s : r f o r r a t l x t o

t?.e genera l po~-lzr.o: and p r m o t e s tne

p o s i t l o n of t i e Jaybird 3ernocrarlc Party

~ r s l d e r s .

T h a t ' s w h a ~ t h l s 1 s r e a l l y a l l about .

Rnd t h e f a c t t h a r t".y d ~ d c ' t pub l l sh the

na res sepa ra te from r t e addresses , i take --

THE COURT: h i c k l € : ' s c o n t r a s t l t .

Assw,~r.g I cez-de ~t today anc be fo re

November 15 th wnere w o u ~ a :he -- where would

the d i f f e r e n c e be? I: I cec:dea today,

what would hap?ec? : d e c ~ c e d f o r you,

l e t ' s say, h y p r h e r r c a l l y , what wobld

happen?

I t wodld be toc l a r e zo change

anything. You c l d halt mtll t h e l a s t

seccnd s o na th r rg wculJ change. Rnc l f

I wcul3 decrde ~t se fo re Noireher lE th ,

yo^ know, wrarever happened, ~ t ' s too l a t e

L e t ' s assume rhaL you c l a m t h a t l t s

a b a l t and swlrch.

KR. G-ER: :iA:r a l l due re spec t , - t ' s

December --

THE CC-URT: Yes, I made an e r r o r . So

now I agree wltP. yol , i L ' s b a l t and s u l t c t ,

t y p o t h e t ~ c e l l y , Jayb:rd S'lpreae Court

dec l s lon 1 s or. a l l i o ; ~ ' s n)ipothetlcall!i.

No= iihat?

%re you go-rq i o chaxge t h e e l e c t ~ o n

p c l l , t he p o l l s . They're g o r g t o -- :hey

have t l n e t o do t'at? They d o n ' t have tlrne t o

do t h a t .

I n essence, ~ t ' s r e a l l y iihatever I do

d o e s n ' t make a d - f fe recce today.

MR. STR-W: Yodr Hacor, t h e elgh: aays

ago o r elch: days f r o 7 tomorrow was the l a s t

c a t e whlch you can f11l vacancies and --

THE COURT: Y O J Zan ' t 5111 vacancies

acymore.

MR. STRUNK: T n a t ' s nor t r u e .

Accardlng t o the f ede ra l law t h e f l l l l n g of

a r y vacancy up t o rhs polnr t h a t t t e y ' r e t o

vo te --

THE COURT: Y o u can f r l l a vacancy

PZOCSEDINZS

c.-.tll Decenber 15zh?

1.R. STRUNK: Yes.

7FE COURT: You zan?

:'R.TRmK: i e s , s l r .

T3E COURT: I f y o u c a r f r l l rr ;111

Uecerroer l j r h , yo.. l u s t arswerea 7 y queszicn.

So the?, 11 essence, the re IS no urgercy

t-. t h l s because, zssxnlrg :hat y o u ' r e

r l q h t , then rhe rzcancy c a r be f i l l e d

a i r e rwards .

Zm. STXWK: I t ' s up ro the l e g l s l a t d r e

accoralng --

THE COURT: ZssuT~lng rna t D i ; t acd si.irtch

15 found - -

MR. SrRUNK: I d ld ~? . IS , I was

+ s s e n ~ i a l l y ~hrawn 13 t he b a r r e l erghr yea r s

ago o? a r o t a l l y unre la t ed ma t t e r . _?3 I

was t o l d t r a t I i a c r o co re back be fo re rhe

cLecclan f o r ~r ro 'ce p roper ly consrcered.

T I E COURT: L e t ' s assune tCat y0.l had t o

come back ~ e i o r e :he e l e c t l l c .

The decrs;or d z e s n ' t have t o be be fo re

rhe elsc::on b f saus t ~ t ' s nsc golnq t o make

any a ~ f t e r e r c e .

1G. Sr.2m.JK: I ~ t l - k 1 ~ ' s essen:lal ro

grve a J u s r l c e cf the Suprame Court

i u r l s d l c t r 3 n over the matcer and I z r l n k --

TXE COURT: So I have ]urlsd:ct~on.

m. STRUNK: Yes, sir.

TXE COURT: 7 re q ~ e s t l o n 1 s :>her. Lne

d e c i s l a n h+s t o oe made.

Does l r have t o be made 1:-. a rush

Kanner l u s t o f f t t e c u f f , s e a t of the

pants?

So ~t can he made l n 2 TOTE

c e l l b e r a t e Tanner sc tr.at 15 t n e r e 1s no

difference a s t o whezher 1:'s made rodzy

o r not belng t h a t Ehe e l e c r o r s c a r be changed

a f t e rwards --

bm. s;PuNK: I agree. T h a t ' s abso lu te ly

c o r r e c i .

n..- ?rr COLXT: Whcz ao yo1 have t 3 say?

MR. GRUER: Certainly t h e r ach lnes

have a l r eady been de l ive red zo t h e pc1llr.g

p laces .

THE COURT: Yod c a n ' t change anything,

s o r t does:..'t make a d l f f e r e - c e . i lmay nor

aaKe a dec:slon today, a l though I may.

I :USE @act -- ; x r e IS a l r z t l i more

argmenE cn wnar 's considered.

I s a C o m ~ s s i o n e r of Deeds a puo l l c

off ,cer?

I43 . STRUNT<: Yes, a c c o r d ~ n g :o --

THE COU?T: A Comlss:oner o: Dte5s .s a

~ u b l l c o f f -ce r?

*. GFS3ER: I d o n ' t know i f ~t does o r

d o e s n ' t , You; Honor.

I4R. STRLWX: The S i a t e a r t l c i e 13 -

i e g ~ s - a r r v e ~ a v consrders 2 --

(Fause.

M R . STRWK: Ezc4 under a r t l c l e c t r e e ,

s e c t l o n sene?, no relnber of :he 1eg:slature

s h a l l , and 1c s;ys b-oveaer i h e ~iernher of

1eg:sLaiure maybe appolnLed Comlss:oner of

Eeeds . Nod C o ~ m s s ~ o n e r of Deeds 1s a pub l l c

a f i r c e r ~ o s l c r o n because they a c t u a l l y :dke

r e s t s under rhe pub l rc o f f i c e r law, pe r i e .

So t h a t C o ~ ~ ~ s s l c n e r of Deeds an0 Notary,

,which a r e two different pos lz lons , a r e ~ d c l : c

o f f l z e r s . r n e y ' r e S i a t e Of f l ce r s as a marter

of f z c t .

Im. GmTR: One rhlng 1 s c l e a r from Lhe

d e f l n ~ t l o n s e c t l o n of tne Publlc O f f l c e r ' s

I Law, t h a t Comrss ioner of Dteus a r e n3 t

S:ectors. lio arqa-ent ca . .

TXE COURT: Ee I S say-ng t h a t the

S o n s t l t ~ t l o n trumps i h ~ ~ set- on m d e r rhe

P l b l l c Of f l ee r L a w .

I*. GFSBER: There ~ s n ' i --

m. STR-mi(: 50:. c o n s t l t u r l a n s .

I*. G'dBER: There 1s"'~ a n y ~ h l r g In

tt-e Ne7b York Scare Cans:A:otlon t h a t

prot.lDlts --

ThE COURT: I $ i l l1 t e l l you h l s

a rgment because I wa:.t -0 32: 1: c l e z r

S O I hear ,your a r g m e r t , t h a r ' s 1-hy I 'm

aebarrng h's argument.

I f a -enber of :he 1eglslat:re be

e l e c ~ e c t o Congress or apFcrnred t o any

s f i r c e , C L V L ~ , 1 guess t t . 2 ~ LS a C-v l l

o f f l e e , c r r n ~ l ~ r a q u?der :he Government

of t h e dnr:ea S ta t - s , i n i c r l z ' s no:, o r the

S t a t e of 1;ei.j York, so we nzve t a lked about

l e g i s l a t o r appoi:.ted ro a c ~ u - 1 o f f ~ c e i n

t h e 3ra:e of Neh Yorh., or n d s r acy Clry

governnent, r r s o r her acce?t:ng t h a t s h a l l

vaca te cls or s e a t ~r the l e q l s l e t c r e and

thdy s p e c i f l z - l l y exclude Zo~n.lss1oner Of

Deeds o r any o f f r c e tha t he o r she recclve

ana vr-e p res ldenr a re specifically ren t roned

ana excluded.

M . STRr>L<: LTnder a r i l c l e rwo. s?ct1o:

cwc, whlc. 1 s e x c l b l t ilunnez e rqh t o r tt.e

declarakior . .

'.m. sWBE3: :n sect:cn two of tn f Nei

York P U D ~ ~ C O f f l c e r ' s Law, Conmlsslorers of

Deeds a r e not rnentloned a s pub l l c ?f::csrs

o r n o t , b i t e1;c:ors of p r e s ~ d e n t and o;ce

p r e s l x n t a r e spec - :~ca i ly excluded by i h e

l e g ~ s l a c u r e .

TH? COLRT: T h a t ' s the p o l n t .

>.ssumlng they a r e exc i idea , you iou ld

rb.ick t h a r tne Cor.xss;oner of Deeds, ae lng

thac 1 c ' s 7 .o~ rnentlonea, 1 s a l s o excluded

anc then t-.e q J e s t l o c 1 s wk.y does 1; mentlo.

the Com.mssroner o Deeds he re , ~ h l c h i s , ;r

essence, noi a pub l i c o f f l e e .

I f 11 ' s not a ~ , k l l c o f i l c e , then :nac

sor: of c u t s l n t c ycur argllrnent t h a t ~ t ' s

not a pub112 o f f l e e .

MR. GWdER: Tyere rsn ' : any argument

tha r ca? suorrac: f r c n s e c t i o n t s o 3f the

Publlc O f f l c e r ' s Law, che e x c l ~ s L o n c f

no =omper.satloc. Tha t ' s i h e q u e s l l o r .

He 1s szylng, I n essence, t h a t :c ~ s ,

t he re L S a 1eg:sla:cr. I z 1s a c l v l l o f i l c e

and r n e y ' r e ?e;ilng paid m d e r :re s r a t e of

New York.

MR. TMER: F:rst of a l l , c h l s a r g m e n t

would 0:-y apply t o =he members of t h e

legislature. Second, t x s - -

TH: COU3T: Hang on, b ~ t t h e r e a r e

menters of t h e l e g i s l a t ~ r e on 11.

MR. STRLNK: Yes.

MR. GRmER: There a re?

r4R. Sr3LINX: Yes.

THE COUFT: JUS; ha re on.

So, I hea r h l s zrgurnent. I don1: know

uh l ch e l e c t o r s you a r e t a l k l n g about .

L e t ' s t a l k akou: the governor. 'he

governor - 5 ncz a member of t h e l e g r i l a t u r e .

MR. STRLTliX: 3s !was :he ?r;slden- of rhe

Senace.

THE COURT: He was, bu t he l s n ' t . Rho

e l s e 1 s z member of r - e 1eg;slaiurel

m. STRIJNK: 0:i t he top of my "ead, the

Speaker of the ;.sserrioly, Y ~ n o r l T y Leaner o i the

Assemoly, Tedesco

?iOCLXDINGS

THE COURT: You ha-~e rt trere. Wrat are

y3u shcwlnq ne there?

YX. SUZBER: ?. close reading of t5e

5-ct:on seven, article three, talks abou;

members of the leg~slarare '<no rece~ve an

a~poi:.rmenr from ihe gouercor, the senaror,

t-.e legislature of any Clty govermect. h d

really an elector doesn't fall Into any of

rnose categories.

Y3. STRiTNK: Tna appointment of

gJxrernor --

KR. G W Z R . The governor doesn't

certlfy anyrhlng, Your Honor. Tne results

of tne elecrian ramorrow 3re cert-fled by che

Srate Board of Elections.

THE COURT: You see tho pclnr as follows,

1e:'s go a lltrle furrher, on ihe fourtn

line, 1: a memer of rhe leglsiat~re b e

e-ected to Congress or appointed :3 an)'

offlce, ~t doesn't say by the ';overnor.

bfR. G;.jBE?,: Okay.

TSE COURT: YOU krow, you rre?tloned teat

~ t ' s only xte governor, ~ t ' s rot.

EZh. GaLBE?: As ve --

Ti.€ COURT: :he questljn 15, wna; is

1

compensatlon.

MR. STHUNK: Relnb.rsement, 13 cenrs z

E l € , whlci. 2s part of arzlcle 12's, 110 is

tne separare relmbursemenr from compensat~an

per dlem, 1"s 13 cents a m-is.

THE COURT: Wto separates l:, the

Co:.stl:ution?

b9.. STRWK: The Election Law.

TYE CO-URT: The Elecrlan La!., separates

~ t , bur I don't knnk lf the Const1tut:on -

we're not gclnq rnaer the Electlon Law.

Urder the Elecrion Law ;t says an

elecror 15 excluded. We're dorng ~t Scalla,

we're qolng rlghr znto the Const1:u:ion

ltself.

VJko says wtar's consloered cornpensa:~on?

Would a dollar be?

Okay, taking your argument, wlsh

Bloomberg, you would say a dollar 1s

compensa:-on?

m. STRUNK: .7ioso1uzely.

T;% COURT: Posslbly a dollar wculd noL

be conpensazlon I£, Ir a sense, that they're

really taklnq a lass because whatever lt'5

going ro cost nlm, I codd tane ludrcial

ZROCEEDINGS

cocs-dered compensatlon, ro aefne

coapensatlon?

m.. STima: accorclng to Bloomerg,

he had to tzie z dollar In lleu ci the zctual

salary thaz he hzs t3 be paid. If he wore

not to take :he dollar. 1: would be ac

unfulfilled contract.

THL COUR:: 1: may be a conrrac: wl:hou~

ccnsiderat-on. You are citing to Bloomerg

and ;'I sure he wodld be happy to near tha:,

the qussrioz s , what 1s -- who says thzr

Sloomberg needed to take the dollar, r.i~-@ber

one.

Ler's assurne ihai he needed raKe :r.e

dollar. If he wants to takf the dollcr's

conpensatlo., wi-at's :ozszdered co!-Qensatlon?

If rr cost :hem a lot more than $15 to

serve ;n tnat offlze, y3u knod tne gas and

whatever, would expe-ses be compensation,

re:.nbursenent of consensatlor, would that

be compensar~on?

mi. S'TRW: Yes.

T E C m T : Where uou-d ~r sraze :hat

would be co-?pensatlon? Tnat coula De lr's

re:m5ursemelt. I'm not servlng for

norice lt's golng rc cost ther. xore :ha"

315. $15 nay nor be conpensatlon.

K?. ST3UNK: biell, the word shzil, :hr;

:s no; nay or can, 11 says shall. Tne lau

essenilally says sha.?.

--,- I..; C3UR'i: S.r.all has nothlng to ac wltn

lt. Shall receive no cornpensatlor ana I don't

L:nou wh2i compensatlon neazs.

Dces ;r mean reimbursement? Does rt

mean a cornpensatlo7 :ha= I get money over

acd above 3.y expenses or ever! li they pay

my expenses, is that coxsldered

compensation?

bR. STRUI'I!?: Rell, the generzl rearing

of compensatlon, you're ge::ing soaethi-.g 12

return for servlces or - i:'s a co2tract.

Sometn:ng 1s rerurned.

There can be no c l a m as long as rhere

, 1s sore;?.lrg traced, uhether ~t be a slbway

token or uhazever, that would be conslderec

co~er-sarlon, ge?.eraliy.

Eur t-ey, under Zlection Law, rhey

specifically dellneate, from an accolnt-rg

sta.dpolct, that which IS fxFenseS and shat

whrch iould show up as rncoae or Gages.

Expenses a r e nor wages. Thls 1s where

the comptrol ler canes I" under :he P lec r lon

Law. The comptrol ler 1 s bro-ghr I n t o a u a l t

the d i f f e r e x c e between expenses and j e r d l en

per s e .

TKE COmT: Ca you have unaer the Incone

-- - ~ ; x Law, ao they ge t a 1399 f o r I:,

M3.. STRLNX: When I do l u r y duty. I

co . T5r CO'SST: You get a 1099 f o r i ~ r y

d r t y ?

m. STRWK: IYell, 1:'s a -- I dld

two yea r s ago. I got sorneth~ng 17 r e ru rn .

1:'s been a long rrr.e. I a i n ge t -- ?.o, I

c a n ' t sgeak t o cha t .

T3E COURT: Cxay.

P n y t h l ~ ? e l s e ?

m. SU3ER: So, Your Honor.

MR. STRUNK: i e s .

T5.ere i s an c r d e r l y r n ~ matrer whlch I

wcLld lLke c; have heard on che 15rh of

November.

THE COURT: Decerner o r Noveroer?

m. S T R U ~ : No'demer.

~ t ' s going t o a controversy w h c h 1 s now

r e s t r a r n t on who the e l e c t o r a i co l l ege , rf

n e ' s ?.ot c jual l fred, a na ru ra l t o r r c i r i z e n ,

we c a x ' t p e r m t a --

TR3 COLXT: You maybe Ir t he wrorg

forum. l f :he FeJerzl - i f t h e Zeds donc:

scow h l n and a r e ?.oc e n f o r c ~ c ~ thz: po r t lon

of the law t h a t r t q u l r e s n r :o be a c l t r z e n

or a t l e a s t p rov l rg :hat he 1 s a c l t l z e n or

was bcrn I n the Uxltec S t a t e s Lha; ycc know,

a S r a t e j,dge w l l l noc be a b l e t o , .n a

back way, not al-ow :he e1ec:ars :a aoze --

KR. STi-UWK: Cer ia ln ly :ce Federal

:cnst l tuLlor wodld require t h a t arybody

~ n l s s s - e l e c t o r s a re no: p r l i a t t

l na ru rdua l s , t h e y ' r e pub l rc officers. and

the re fo re w.ust take 2 - oa th , a t l e a s t be

w l l l l r q t s take an oath t o s u j p o r t the

Cons t l tu r lon of the S i a t e of N e w Y o r k and

tt.e US Consc:tutlon and p e r t 3f chat --

Deczuse t h e r e i s eo s r a t c t e bnat says

snr,eDody, sonebody :s golng 70 c o l l e c c r h l s

c e r t i f ~ c a t e of b ~ r t h , no m e r e I n zny

r e d e r a l Law does ~t say a ser-ator rnust

submit n l s c e r t l f l z a r e of slr:h o r anywhere.

l t ' s s o r e t h ~ n g ~ t e r e r f a zlt:ien doesn ' t

,,-= =-ore the Suprerne Court or. cce mazter of --

- t ' s UP before J u s t l c e Souter t h l s morning

a s t o whether o r . o t Obma should prove t h a t

h e ' s so rn --

THE COUZT: I rhought he proved t h a t he

was bcrn rn &war1 yes te raay .

m. STRUKK: There was no pr2of .

THE COURT: I thcught ke r e l eased rhe

b ~ r t h c e r t l f l s a t e .

1.m. S T R M : I t was :oc a s l r z h

c e r t l f l c a t e . IL -as a c e r t l f l c z s e of l l v e

o l r t h , whlch Hawall could accept from a?y

co;ncry, ; ce r ; l f i ca re of r e g r s t r a t l o n of a

l.ve 3 1 ~ r h . I c s ]us7 d i f f e ren : cnan a --

THE ZOmT: gas l t zccepted t-.e saxe

dzy he was born?

'3. STRUiiK: That accord l rg - t h e r e i s

ac exn-bl t 16 wh;cr Goes t o :nat I s sue .

T-E ... CO-mT: Nhat does L: have r o dc wlrh

me 7

bm. STWVrIK: Well --

T?E COURT: Thls I s a ?ede rz l q e s t l o n

as t o wherher o r not i e can se rve a s the

p r e s r d e - t . m. STRTJNK: I would l l k e t o ger a

have s t anc lng ro say, who =as --

THE COURT: You may bave s ~ a n d ~ , ~ y l n

t h e wrong courc chouqn. I woulo tn lnk t h l s

wou-d be a Federal Csurt lo sue 2s t o whetter

o r not he rs born ir t h e 2n l t ed Scates per

s e .

I f rhey, ~f rhey u a l l o a t e lt, t t e n I

wnulr t h r . t h r , yo^ know, tie czn, they can

vote f o r t;m --

!43. STRUNK: The e l e c t o r s . rhe vo:ers

02 t h e fodr th do noc ~ o t e f o r any canlrdace

except f o r the e l e c t c r a l s l a t e and tF.2:'~

p l a l c and s l w l e . The re21 e l e c t l o n occurs

s t a r t i n g ;he 15 th and i t ' s got t o be

completed by tne 24th of Decedcer so chere

1s a josslbl1r:y of srven, exgh:, nine days

of per dlem fo r the E lec to ra l College t o

dea l wlth these ques t l cns .

m d ~ s s e d upon :he winner take a l l

p rocess , we nay have r o e l l r u n a t e t h e

pub l l c off:cers who nave now become Feaeral

O f f i c e r s e igh t o r n z e o r r en fzom :be

Democrats, khick brlngs r r down t o 20

Democra: e l e c t o r s , and then the next

h lqhes t number would come out o f the

vote g e t t e r s , so Lhere would oe 15

Pepubllcan e l e c t o r s 3rd q u l t e a b a t t l e fo r

naybe n:ce aaqs who -- r t ' s up t o then. ::.ey

a r e t h e ozes e l e c t e d :o so lve those p rodems

s c t h a ~ I ' m 1 - re res rcc I n a ~ ~ d l c ~ a l swpoena

0: t r a v e l records f rox 1960, 1963.

THE COURT: You asked f o r thaz I" your

papers?

m. GRABE9: No.

m. STRuNK: T:?at 1 s I?. my aff;daaLt.

L e t ' s s e e .

I'm zskrr:q t h a t i n my sbpportrng

a f ' l d a v ~ t whlch l c says 07. age -- paragraph

16 of my supporting a f f l d a v ~ t , pace f l v e

of seven, fur:?er-;iore Thai p r e l r r a c a r j -

~ r j u n c t - o n h e a r ~ n g wlth New Yark S:ate

Boarc of ; l ec t lons a r 3 ~ t s agen t , lnclza:n?

th.e Dl rec to r o i E lec t l cns and Kew York S t a t e

Sec re ta ry of S r z t e who nus: show why t r e y

s rou ld no t perform d ~ e d r l i z e n c e :3

ascertain whether or n,t Sarack Hussein

Obaaa 1s + narura l born cl:izen 213

a f f e c t e d by the al1eg;trons i n t i e

a io reEecc~oned case.

Or, paragraph 1 5 , where the rror ier

TKZ COU3T: JUII a mlnuce.

What do you have t o say abo-r t-.at?

bR. GSRkBER: Tnls 1 s not p a r t of the

order ro s h o ~ cause t h a t we're hear;:g t h l s

nornrng. The S tace has not n o t l i e d t h a t

Mr. Sirunk *as mak;n; I n app l l caz lon wlth

res?ecr EO Senatcr Ozama's c l t l z s i s h l p .

I t seems a s rcough Xr. Srru?.k's

conzerns wlth Obama's p lace o i o r l g l - s

a r e aa rn ly ;he focus of a separace ac t lon

ir.hlch 1 s under a sep5rate lncex r m o e r .

He provlded a sucslons axd c o r p l a l n t

I n tha r a c t l o n , but ~ t ' s not a marter Se fo re

your xor.or.

0: course, everyzhlng cha t Xr. Strunk

r.as l u s ~ sa13 and e v s r y t h ~ n g ~ h a c h e ' s put

I n h;s pcEers with respec t t o Senator Oba?a

1 s de r lvec from :he I q t e r n e t .

m . STauNK: T h i c ' s not t r u e .

m. GPUBR: I r ~ e r n e t qoss lp .

!a. STRW: No: :rue.

144. GRABER: 2 a r t l c u l a r l y frox a lablsult

t h a t i a s f l l e d In the Eastern 3 l s t r l c t 0:

Pennsy-vanla w h c h was a l s r u s s e o on

OCt0321 24th.

L-C 1s where the C~r t .7 occurrea. a d tha:

tne Unlted S t a t e s s z a t e Department has

those r ecords whlch a r e prlma f a c r e k-kett.er

she was i n s l d e o r ouzslde che c o m t r y .

Anc rhere 1 s cestlmony recorded of S a r a .

Oahma, who 1 s e s s e n z ~ a l l y - xas presen: zr

t he b l r t h I n Mombasa an2 t h a t t h e r e was a

r e s t r l c c l o . on a i r p l a c e f l l g h c vhlch d ld

noc permit 2 preqnan: woman co e n t e r ha-.<

l n r o =he country because of t h e pregnanzy

and the r e a r qlvlnq b l r t h .

And i h s r e f o r e , .n Hawarr the a- tual

o r ~ g l n a l f u l l c e r t l f l c a t e of b l r t h show1r.q

McTbasa P o s p ~ t a l presence 1 s on record i n

H - ,w,_, -. . r q k r now and t h a t t h e r e r s only a

r e g l s t r a r l o n , whlch .s hoir. Kawall workea ~n

1961, they ]..st becone a s t a r e . They were

essentially a p r o t e c ~ o r a t e of t h e Unl:ed

$.-i rLa ies . I: i a s e n z l r e l y s t r u c t u r e d of

?.o.,J people regrscered under a US p ro tec ro ra te

s o t n a t a r e g l s t r a t l o r of a l ~ v e b ~ r c h 1s

wnat Gas ~ s s u e o and what was snowr by LC?

Emenberg ?ouxdatlon iho t a d a confl1:r of

I n r e r e s t s a n g one of t n e i r arzorneys ln t n e

i r r s t p-ace --

That case 1 s ? n t l t l e c Berg, 3-E-a-G, v.

3barna. kd the i i s r e r n Dis:rrcr of

Peansylvarrz n l s m ~ s s e c chr case f o r l i c k

3f s ' a n d l r 0 same zhlng 1 s :rue ?ere.

Fr. Szrunk doesn ' t h a - ~ e ;ny i n t e r e s t

rn whether Obana r s rhe Dsnocrai lc c a c d ~ d a i e

3: Nncm t h e e l e c r a r s are wlih r i specr ro

3csma fro-n tne s t rncpc ln t of Obama's

c l t i z e n s h l p . ?e has a ge2erz l l zed mte res :

t h a t a s any o the r person. T h a t ' s no:

su:flclenc fo r s t a n a l r g .

:he Zasrerr D ~ s r r x c r oi Pennsylvanlz

s h o u l ~ n ' t be In t n l s Col;rt e i t h e r .

.m. STRTJNK: 'I?e o r l y ~ h l n g ;?at we

have I n t?.ls Ccur-try t h a t nolds us toge the r

1 s chs Cor.srr tutron, a soc-a1 i o n t r a c r , ana

t h a t f u n d m e n ~ a l of ~ k a t s o c l a l co7tra2t

1 s wnecher o r c o t 'we're g-lng t o e l e c t a

man w.-.o would run t h l s country f o r f o u r

yea r s who i s a l l egeo i o be a fo re igner ,

illegal, illegal a l l e n who 1s 1 n p r 3 ~ e r l y

I r t h l s ~ o ~ n i r y , azcordlrg t o h:s reenzry

ai:er comi-.q back w ~ t h &n Indonssiar

- -= - , , - i ~ o r t wnen he er.zered oask a r age 18,

c h a t ' s coveren I n e x m b l r 1 6 .

Rather than getclng d e t i l l s , i oe l l eve ,

I'm the only one I n =he country whose

r e a l l y , rsrough my s r , experrenee, tf.rough

t h e Deparzment of :e;lth, througn my own

t r ack lng down b l rcn z e r t l f l c a t e s and

affll:a==or.s, a l l s o r r s of s k u l l l ~ g g e r y

t h a t i wecr t o c o ~ r t f o r a year and k a l f , two

years over I n Manhairan, I t n ~ n k 1 1 ' s

rbso lu te iy essential t h a t we see m e crave1

records of the nother from 1360 La i463

e.$en l n c&Tera, eve r I n camera 1: =here

i s a p r lvacy I s sue , 2 1 s wonar and her

r ecora 1 s essentially the 1lnchp:n t o

whether o r not we ' r e co:nq t o have a Tan

wco, accordrna i o zhs pas t D e p ~ r y 2 t to rney

General of Pennsylvznia, 2 man of good

s t and lca wlth many zour t s , t h a t somehow we

shoulPhroow h l n --

!a. G ~ E I : 1:'s slmply no; ae fo re

Your Eanor.

TKE COURT: H3k 15 ;t before JUStlc?

S o ~ t e r zoday?

p.m. G?.?BER: Azsord~nq --

m. STIUNK: .c.z;orcing t o K r . 3erg,

who was Lntervlewtd l a s t nlghc, n e had

PROCEEDINGS

submitted f l v e days a:o t o So,.iter, who 1 s

the justice, s l n g l e ] u s ~ l c e whc d e a l s i - l th

t i e Thlrd C l r c u l t , :o orSer Obama t o deliver

a c e r t l f l z a c s of o ~ r t h . Th;:'s what ~ t s

asklng f o r .

THE COURT: O<ay, Declslon reseriled.

KR. ZXn3E'n: Th224 you, Your Honor.

THE COURT: 3s i ; s l l . Have a good day.

I don ' c chlnk I'm gorng t o I s sue a

decision today b e c a ~ s c l t ' s r e a l l y -- l t ' 5

not u rgen t .

MR. STRUNK: I ' T not a? a t t o r i e y , t h e only

way I can ge t avy docments t n a t would be the

bas:* f o r a November 15th hearlng woulc be lf

w e r e 1s gorng t o be a restra:nt Issue@ befo re

t r e c e r t l f r c a t - o n cf rhe e l e c t o r s t h a t a l l we

need t o see 1s nazes and i n e d a t e s a r e --

THE COURT: 1 '~r3ers:and t h a t . Dec1slon

re se rved .

*

Certified t o be a t r u e and accura te t r a n s c r i p t of

t h e foregoing proceedings.



Exhibit 5

. . LAMAR COUNTY, GA. SUPERIOR COURT

DEPUTY CLERK

NOTICE OF RELEASE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION

TO : STATE OF NEW YOW, Releasee

IN RE : USUFRUCT "CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK," "CHF?ISTOP(58!$$&..; ET'I'Xyd'&!!hiiStophe'r E. Strunk"

FROM: Christopher Earl Strunk, in esse Releasor I hereby certify the-ivithin and foregoing to be a true, correct and complete copy of the original

STATE OF NEW YORK ) =* , z * s

COUNTY OF KINGS )

Deaty Clerk L ar Su *Comt Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse (Rekasor) being d y m o d . Bho kay m d e r pma*. of pe jury:

Releasor until further notice is located for senrice at 593 Vanderbik Avenue -281 B- New Y d 11238 within the State of New York subdivision of the city of New Yo*

I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, absolutely release all personal property interests, k@ &/m equitable, in the public United States Citizen 'CHRISTOPHER EARL SIR= meatd cm J- #, 1947, upon the filing of the trust instrument in the State of Nevi York suW-

- - calxqd h T o r k within the City of New York, the USUFRUCT Deed Certificate No.: 037% aith the W 6 d m NO0232437 (see Exhibit A).

I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, reserve all personal pmperty rights kg4 and pmEtd rn secured by the Constitution of the United States. the Gmstitution of dh Stae d i 5 d 1 d z ~ ~ Z h

I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, intend no longer to be the f o r t h %a w v - States Citizen "CHRISTOPHER EARC STRUNK,' 'CHMlSlr-BP-F-TER E sSIXWiiP Z >= m any derivative of the "nom de guerre' thereof, such as ~~ R SEEXI CFkTX

I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, presen* a r e s i & m o F ; t h e ~ d b Y ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ former natural-born Citizen status coniferred at natmd l&tk cn J- Z& I F I-

that status being a private idkidpal United - C-- - -? - L &?k - Amendment to the United States Con- sir& c k 5 & m F3ik z-EhiW XlBI ZS q=

I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, inrtendl to be barnna & BSb -a accordance with Chapter 17-B of the State d W Y d k g - d ?h Release of a power of

This Release renders null a d Poid any E- Rdstmz d!% q f State of New York and or subfrkkhd@. f' --\

- :q 4

-.,-.. -.. ..... I

v I . . . - .. ... ; .- I

k \ .

--. F' ~bdrlarm~ww*--bJr-

.: Blus -raved harder and scale M h raised intagCb printing - M u l r i q o b d *-,* t d d 4 \

, . \ ~ l c r ( , ~ r l ~ h d t h e w w d s ~ e w ~ ~ ~ i t y D s p e ; b n e n t d ~ e a ~ h a d ~

+ Hygiene immedhtely above the boltom @y/ard Wbk using rn a mwitylng glass

I b

_ _ . - - - *. b.

I , I S

COPY

DEPUTY CU

STATE OF NEW YO= SUBDIVISION COUNTY OF NEW YO&

WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YO= , .. /

- . -

TO : STATE OF NEW YORK, Releasee 1

C/O THE CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK with Chapter 17-B New York State Estates, Powers and Ttusts Article 10 Section 9.2 Release of a power of a p w

IN RE : USUFRUCT "CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK,' 'CI-DUSIOPHER E SIRUMLf Tfm51

FROM: Christopher Earl Strunk, in esse Releasor

NOTICE OF m E molu: - r O C b B S I D ~ 0 9

Exhibit A - usvrp~v~rll)eed - x ~ - - ~ ~ ~ " r i h e

Dated: A ~ Y o 4 ~ Y t a c k r -1- - \/' --- - - E 3 k c 2 z m 3 a t

3?TF?+et%*

COPY LAMAR C ~ ~ ~ K ' G A - C ~ U R T

DEPUTY CLlE

STATE OF GEORGIA SUBDIVISION COUNTY OF LAMAR --.

- TO : STATE OF NEW YORK, Releasee

C/O THE CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF LM$AR STATE OF GEORGIA WWB5 TOWN OF BARNESVILLE, GEORGIA with Chapter 17-B a f t b c b P d State Estates, Powers and Trusts Anticle 10 Section 9.2 R e k n s e ~ a ~ a f appointment Sub-Section (c) Such release may be delivered to any of t l w person, other than the donee, who might be advmsely af5ected by an exuc

IN RE : USUFRUCT "CHRISTOPHER EARL SIRUhK" "CEIRZSTOPHER E SlMMK

FROM: Christopher Earl Strunk, in esse Releasor

NOTICE OF RELEASE WR'HOWT ICO-

Dated: Brooklyn, Hew Yo& October +* 2012



Exhibit 6


that this Petition requests expedited emergency equity relief with a CPLR §7805 injunction with a stay of

New York Electoral College vote due by December 15, 2012 until the Court renders a declaratory judgment

on the issues of law under CPLR §7806 regarding U.S. Constitution: Article 2 in its entirety, especially

Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 3 (A2S1C3) as amended by the Article 7 Amendments the 12th , the 14th

especially sections 3 and 4, the 20th, and the 25th ; further, especially as to the U.S. Constitution Article 2

Section 1 paragraph 5 (A2S1C5) term of art “natural born Citizen” (NBC) natural law issue versus the idiom

“born a citizen” positive law created by the New York State Board of Elections (NYS BOE); further, the

U.S. Constitution: Article 3 Section 3; Article 4; Article 6; and furthermore, related New York State law and

regulations as applies to the public officer oath, duties and obligation as applies with use of NYS Civil

Service Law §105, and that Petitioner seeks equity relief on six (6) issues of Law with Facts pertaining to the

misapplication and misadministration of Public Officer acts as relate to the December 5, 2008 Order and

Decision as a matter of State Law heard by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. at I.A.S. Part 1 in the

Article 78 Petition with Kings County Index No.: 2008-29641, and Complaint with Index No.: 2008 29642;

and also, Petitioner challenges the New York U.S. Senate Election as void ab initio with U.S. Constitution

Amendment 17 and NYS Constitution Article 3 §7 grounds; and that based upon information and belief and

at all times hereinafter mentioned, with imminent irreparable harm as time is of the essence and without

another forum for relief, alleges of captioned Respondents and related persons as follows:

1. Petitioner Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse, is a duly registered voter of the 64th Election District

of the 57th Assembly District (AD) and within the New York 8th U.S. House District at 593 Vanderbilt

Avenue – 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 for ten years with email: [email protected] and cell phone 845-901-

6767, and an enrolled member of the Republican Party who participated at the November 6, 2012 General

Election there voted entirely for the Republican Party line of candidates with Wendy Long for US Senate.

2. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner duly served his COMPLAINT OF ATTEMPT TO COMMIT A

CRIME BY A PUBLIC OFFICER WITH NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST AN INJUNCTION IN

KINGS COUNTY WITH DECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS (hereinafter the “COMPLAINT”)

upon the respective County District Attorney (DA) with jurisdiction over the domicile of residence of the



respective Public Officer member of the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College for a

total of 29 members variously domiciled in Fourteen (14) Counties that are now duly elected without

challenge on November 6, 2012, pending the NYS BOE final tally / canvassing by the end of November, all

serve as public officer electors to cast their votes by December 15, 2012 and that then will be transmitted to

the U.S. Senate President Joseph Biden in a joint seating of the new Congress on January 3, 2013 take their

oath of office in the new Congress that there will select the next President / vice President of the United

States (POTUS) according to the 12th and 20th Amendments of A2S1C3.

3. That the criminal COMPLAINT affirms of each Public Officer in each domicile therein quote:

[each] Elector as part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6, 2012 General Election for choosing New York’s candidate for the office of President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15, 2012; and that such Public Officers are to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college intending to vote for Barack Obama as if mandated by the State of New York legislature with exclusive power afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer including office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).

That in addition to the foregoing, Affirmant based upon information and belief contends that Barack Obama is guilty of forgery, spoliation, concealment intimidation of witnesses and racketeering in the matter of his alleged Common Law citizen status as if a Native-born Citizen notwithstanding the allegiance status of his parents rather than a Natural Law Natural-born Citizen born on soil to married US citizen parents, nevertheless is a British Subject with dual allegiance at birth wherever that was to the minor US Citizen mother in wedlock to a majority aged British subject foreign alien student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother’s custody during her 2

nd marriage Barack Obama was adopted in Indonesia by his Indonesian Citizen step-

father, Lolo Soetoro, who gave the name “SOEBARKAH” according to the U.S. State Department record affirmed on the August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and thereafter as an Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Barry Soetoro) reentered the USA in 1971 alone without a US Passport to live with his grandmother who obtained foreign student funding, illegally obtained a stolen Social Security Number no later than 1980, forged a Selective Service filing dated 1980, and inter alia in furtherance of usurpation of the office of POTUS no later than April 25, 2011, according to more than three experts, forged a Long Form Certificate of Birth as if of Hawaii.

That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack Obama has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GÜLEN Movement and Iran against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through Morocco, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason; and that any candidate elector and or public officer including … who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition and treason.



Based upon the foregoing subject there is a preponderance of evidence proving that the April 25, 2011 forged public document is for the purpose of usurping the POTUS, and that were any New York State Public Officer Electors to cast a vote aiding abetting each crime the civil servant would be an accessory after the fact to a felony under New York Penal Law; and as such Affirmant provides due notice hereby as a matter of standing guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through §2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law § 16-100, N.Y.S. CPLR § 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law § 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3

rdparties, books and records, and personal knowledge. “

4. That the respective County DA with jurisdiction over crimes of electors in each of fourteen counties

are: P. David Soares Albany District Attorney; Robert T. Johnson The Bronx District Attorney; Frank A.

Sedita, III Erie District Attorney; Charles J. Hynes District Attorney of Kings; Sandra Doorley District

Attorney of Monroe; Kathleen M. Rice District Attorney of Nassau; Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District Attorney of

New York; William J. Fitzpatrick District Attorney of Onondaga; Francis D. Phillips District Attorney of

Orange; Richard A. Brown District Attorney of Queens; Thomas J. Spota District Attorney of Suffolk; Gwen

Wilkinson District Attorney of Tompkins; Kevin C. Kortright District Attorney of Washington; Janet

DiFiore District Attorney of Westchester; and act independently of this civil action.

5. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner duly served a NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ARTICLE 78

PETITION WITH AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

PENDING A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS (hereinafter known as

the “NOTICE”) upon the respective County District Attorney with jurisdiction over the domicile of

residence of the respective Public Officer member of the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle

Electoral College of 29 members in Fourteen (14) Counties got Notice that stated quote:

“Please take notice of Petitioner’s intent to file an order to show cause application at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 11 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on Monday November 19, 2012 for a preliminary injunction relief pending a declaratory judgment on issues of law; e.g., Are public officers to be held liable as accessories to felonies in usurpation of Office of POTUS and Ballot access? Are public officers presented with the facts of Barack Obama ineligibility able to change qualifications before the Electoral College Vote scheduled December 15, 2012?”



6. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner had a person not a party to this suit serve a copy of the

COMPLAINT and NOTICE upon the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College

Members for a total of 29 members in Fourteen (14) Counties individually as follows:

1. Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 2. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 3. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 4. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 5. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 6. Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 7. Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 8. Bill DeBlasio of 442 11th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 9. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 10. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 11. Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 12. Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025 13. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 14. Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York, NY 10002 15. Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037 16. Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001 17. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 18. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023 19. Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014 20. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 21. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 22. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 23. Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103 24. Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 25. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 26. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 27. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 28. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849 29. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710

7. That Petitioner has been barred from filing any further suit without leave by the Order of Arthur M.

Schack J.S.C. in the fraud complaint Strunk v NYS BOE et al Index No.: 2011-6500 under penalty of

contempt against Public Officers:

Andrew M. Cuomo of 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 Tom DiNapoli of 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025 Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York, NY 10002

; and therefore, such named Public officers are not included herein unless by leave to do so.



AS AND FOR THE FIRST QUESTION THE NEW YORK ELECTION OF KIRSTEN

GILLIBRAND TO US SENATE IS VOID AB INITIO AS THE ELECTOR

QUALIFICATIONS ARE NOT EQUAL TO THAT OF THE NEW YORK ASSEMBLY 8. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 7

with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that as and for the first question

the New York election held November 6, 2012 of Kirsten Gillibrand to the U.S. Senate from New

York is void ab initio as to elector qualifications are not equal to that of the New York Assembly .

9. Petitioner seeks to overturn New York’s U.S. Senate election with U.S. Const. Amendment 17

“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. ..”

as the November 6, 2012 election for U.S. Senator from New York between Democrat Candidate

Kirsten Gillibrand and Republican Candidate Wendy Long was conducted for electors not meeting

the qualifications of a member of the Assembly with State Constitution Article 3 Section 7:

“. No person shall serve as a member of the legislature unless he or she is a citizen of the United States and has been a resident of the state of New York for five years, and, except as hereinafter otherwise prescribed, of the assembly … district for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election; … or member of assembly at the first election next ensuing after a readjustment or alteration of the … assembly districts becomes effective, a person, to be eligible to serve as such, must have been a resident of the county in which the senate or assembly district is contained for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election. …” (Emphasis added by Petitioner)

10. In addition to the above listed State Officers, Petitioner has also been barred from filing any further

suit without leave by the Order of Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. in the fraud complaint Strunk v NYSBOE et al

Index No.: 2011-6500 under penalty of contempt against other Public Officers and State entities:

The New York State Board of Ellection and its agents The New York Secretary of State City of New York among many other persons;

as such named Public officers and agencies are not included herein unless by leave to do so, Petitioner

wishes the Court to void the U.S. Senate Election and ask the Governor set a special election, because a

significant number of the electors casting their respective vote were domiciled in New York for less than



fives years and had not lived in their respective county of domicile for at least twelve months and there is no

way to determine from the votes cast on Novemebr 6, 2012 of those qualified what candidate was voted for.

11. That Petitioner’s right to suffrage, a republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; are and

would be infringed were the election of US Senator not held void ab initio and that a new special election

held; and therefore, public officers yet name along with Respondent Kirsten Gillibrand of 15 West 26th

Street, Suite 4R, New York, NY 10010 with her present place of business at Washington, DC Office

478 Russell Washington, DC 20510, as a public officer has infringed my rights and acted contrary to the law

of the land with those yet named as each Respondent must either be sanctioned and barred from office and a

new special elelction arranged for qualified elelctors as soon as possible.

12. In addition to the US Senate Election, regarding the POTUS Election there are five (5) categories of

elector public officers who are the respondents herein that each of whom have separate and or combined

issue questioned specifically as to each member of the respective categrory or jointly, and that based upon

information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, Petitioner respectfully alleges a question of law

issue as to the captioned Respondents within each category of those public or quasi public officers with

fiduciary duty who were notified of an accessory crime in which each participates in, especially if their

respective vote is cast as an elector are :

a. The Electors who are Public Officers elected to Congress duty as to matter of law and facts.

b. The Electors who are Public Union trustees have fiduciary duty as to matter of law and facts.

c. The Electors who are Registered Lobbyists have fiduciary duty as to matter of law and facts.

d. All the Electors as Public Officers when notified of crime have duty as to the law and facts.

e. The Elector private person as an Elector Public Officer duty as to matter of law and facts.

13. That Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7801 as to the nature of proceeding for relief

by writ of mandamus or prohibition that shall be obtained in a proceeding under this article is made for a writ

or order of prohibition, in which such reference shall, so far as applicable, be deemed to refer to the

proceeding authorized by this article.



14. That Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7802 as to captioned Parties of electors listed

herein in part is in keeping with the definition of "body or officer", and the expression "body or officer" that

includes every court, tribunal, board, corporation, officer, or other person, or aggregation of persons, whose

action may be affected by a proceeding under this article; and that Petitioner contends that Respondent

Electors have maliciously acted contrary to the prohibition in favor of another and where this proceeding is

brought to restrain the Electors individually and as a body or officers from proceeding without or in excess of

jurisdiction in favor of another, the latter shall be joined as a party; and that Petitioner understands that other

interested persons in adequately represented by Petitioner actions herein by order of the court may direct that

notice of the proceeding be given to any person, and may allow other interested persons to intervene were it

not to prejudice the emergency nature of this action.

15. In addition to the above question Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7803

raises Questions that may be raised in a proceeding under this article that are as follows:

AS AND FOR THE SECOND QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS HAKEEM

JEFFRIES AND GRACE MENG AS TO NEW U.S. HOUSE MEMBERS AND

ELECTORS WITH A DUTY AS TO A MATTER OF LAW AND FACTS ARE IN

CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AS SUCH PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED ARE

BARRED ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE REVIEW AFTER JANUARY 2, 2013.16. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 15

with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers Respondent

Hakeem Jeffries and Respondent Grace Meng as to new U.S. House members and Electors with a duty as to

matter of law and facts are in conflict with U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 2, i.e. A2S1C2

states “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of

Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be

entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of

Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.” as such persons

similarly situated are barred Electoral College vote review after January 2, 2013.



17. Other than U.S. Constitution Article VI it does not specify the form of oath a Congressman is to take

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

and was a function of the respective state and federal law as in New York State Public Officer Law §10

requires every public officer to take and file an oath or affirmation prior to the discharge of any of their

official duties and to be certified to the clerk of the respective body . The form of the oath or affirmation is

set forth in Article XIII, Section 1 of the New York State Constitution ( )1

18. That Petitioner’s understanding of the Decision and Order of Justice Schmidt referenced above is

that a New York Electoral College Elector is merely a private person not required to take an oath in New

York or elsewhere to uphold the State or Federal Constitution and as such may vote as a private person.

19. That Petitioner’s New York State Assembly Representative of the 57th AD is presently Respondent

Hakeem Jeffries of 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 and pending the final tally and

canvassing by the end of the month of November will also be the Elected member of the United States House

of Representatives from the New York 8th House District

20. That Respondent Hakeem Jeffries intends as a House member to take his oath to uphold the State

and US Constitution on Janaury 3, 2013, intends to sit in the joint session of Congress thereafter to review

his own and other votes as an elector as a second bite of the apple despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 to do

so; and intends so despite that Respondent has been given notice by Petitioner.

1 NYSC ARTICLE XIII Public Officers [Oath of office; no other test for public office] Section 1. Members of the legislature, and all officers, executive and judicial, except such inferior officers as shall be by law exempted, shall, before they enter on the duties of their respective offices, take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of New York, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of ......, according to the best of my ability;" no other oath, declaration or test shall be required as a qualification for any office of public trust, except that any committee of a political party may, by rule, provide for equal representation of the sexes on any such committee, and a state convention of a political party, at which candidates for public office are nominated, may, by rule, provide for equal representation of the sexes on any committee of such party. (Amended by Constitutional Convention of 1938 and approved by vote of the people November 8, 1938.)



21. Respondent Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 is a American lawyer

holding an office of trust and profit and is a member of the New York State Assembly, representing the 22nd

assembly district in Flushing, Queens, New York, and pending the final tally and canvassing by the end of

November will also be the Elected member of the United States House of Representatives from the New

York 6th House District.

22. That the Respondent Grace Meng as a House member takes her oath to uphold the State and U.S.

Constitution before Janaury 3, 2013, and then intends to sit in the joint session of Congress thereafter to

review her own and other votes as an elector as a second bite of the apple despite the prohibitition by

A2S1C2 to do so; and intends so despite that Respondent has been given notice by Petitioner.

23. That arguendo re A2S1C2, “but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of

Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector“ use is still with the original meaning

and intent despite the addition of the 12th , 14th , 16th and 20th Amendments notwithstanding; and that the

original use before ratification of the 14th amendment considered each State of the several States was

sovereign and not subservient to the USA in regards to the enforcement of the Bill of Rights applied to the

Federal entity that was properly termed these United States not as now termed after ratification of the `14th

Amendment (1868) became the singular United States, as each State of the several States became and now

remain subservient along with every state citizen therein placed under USA jurisdiction per se; and

24. Further arguendo re original use of A2S1C2, “but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding

an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector“ includes any state

officer and or public officer accordingly, and that the same meaning for “Senator” who was appointed by the

respective State legislature before the 17th Amendment as the representative of the respective State is then

and now intended to equate that relationship to every House member even though elected by State Citizens

privileged to vote, and therefore also equates to every “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” too,

and therefore includes every Public officer, in any state or federal jurisdiction, all except a private person per

se; and.



25. Furthermore arguendo re the issues of Law with Facts pertaining to the misapplication and

misadministration of Public Officer acts in 2012 as relate to the December 5, 2008 Order and Decision as a

matter of State Law heard by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. at I.A.S. Part 1 in the Article 78

Petition with Kings County Index No.: 2008-29641 as a matter of the Federal Law of the Land A2S1C2 still

un-amended is that the only interpretation of State law involved in the Order and Decision of December 5,

2008 by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. must be in keeping with the exclusive power, McPherson v.

Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), of the New York State Legislature in its plenary formation of the New York

electoral college may not change the meaning of A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 at best would have to be a retiring

public officer to serve as an elector but make any “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” after

January 2, of the year following the general election of the POTUS ineligible and as such the member of the

respective Electoral College is to be a private U.S. Citizen under Federal jurisdiction as an elector is a public

officer per se who votes by no later than December 25, 2012 every four years and when the joint seating of

Congress convenes on January 3, 2013 the next year and every four years thereafter until there is a

amendment to the quasi Federal officer status of an elector means that without an amendment, no State and

or Congress may change the eligibility requirements of a Federal officer includes the elector as well as that

of POTUS with A2S1C5, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995).

26. A State Officer and local officer as public officers hold an office of trust, and that persons registered

with a privilege from the State such as an attorney, union trustee, lobbyist hold an office of trust for profit.

27. That were Respondents Grace Meng, Hakeem Jeffries and or anyother person similarly situated

according to A2S1C2 who are officers of the State while acting as electors and as persons holding an office

of trust or profit to review their own vote in Congress after Janaury 2, 2013 and also be an elector would

infringe Petitioner’s right to suffrage, a republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; and

therefore, Respondents acts as public officers is and would be contrary to the law of the land as each

Respondent must either be barred from voting or office and or if done be referred for criminal action.



AS AND FOR THE THIRD QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO ARE THE

ELECTORS WHO ARE PUBLIC UNION TRUSTEES WHO HAVE A FIDUCIARY

DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE

POTUS ELIGIBILITY QUALIFICATIONS OF A2S1C5 AND ARE IN CONFLICT

WITH A2S1C2 AND ARE BARRED FROM SUCH VOTE AS A BREACH OF A

FIDUCIARY DUTY TO THEIR MEMBERSHIP AND PEOPLE OF NEW YORK



electors who are public union trustees have a fiduciary duty as to matters of law and facts attempt

to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications of A2S1C5 and are in conflict with A2S1C2, are

barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to their membership and People of the State of

New York.

29. That Respondent George Gresham is a incumbent elected President of 1199 SEIU United

Healthcare Workers East to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college.

30. That Respondent George Gresham is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as

a qusai Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest

as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elelctor

tovote by Decmber 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner.

31. That Respondent Mario Cilento is a incumbent elected President of the New York State AFL-CIO

by the organization's Executive Council to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral

college.

32. That Respondent Mario Cilento is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a

qusai Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest





33. That Respondent Scott Adams is a incumbent elected director of UAW Region 9 with Local 686

Local 774 Local 1069 Local 1097 Local 2300 Local 3303 to participate as a member of the State of New


34. That Respondent Scott Adams is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a

quasi Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest



35. That were Public Union Fiduciary Respondents and any other similar representative similarly

situated to cast a vote a POTUS candidate that is not eligible for POTUS would infringe Union member trust

and similarly private US citizens like Petitioner’s right to suffrage, republican form of governement,

Freedom and Liberty; and therefore, their action as public officers is contrary and should lead to removal

from their office and or disbanning the respective union and return of alll union member funds.

AS AND FOR THE FOURTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO ARE

THE ELECTORS WHO ARE REGISTERED LOBBYISTS HAVE FIDUCIARY

DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ARE QUASI PUBLIC OFFICERS

WITH A FIDUCIARY DUTY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE POTUS ELIGIBILITY

QUALIFICATIONS OF A2S1C5 AND ARE IN CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AND

ARE BARRED FROM SUCH VOTE AS A BREACH OF A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK



electors who are registered lobbyists have fiduciary duty as to matters of law and facts are quasi

public officers with a fiduciary duty attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications of



A2S1C5 and are in conflict with A2S1C2, are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary

duty to the People of the State of New York

37. That Respondent Emily Giske is a incumbent government affairs specialist based in New York with

extensive experience in Albany and New York City. She has lobbied for corporations, financial institutions,

not-for-profit entities and local municipalities including Las Vegas gambling interests lobbyist to participate

as a member of the State of New York electoral college.

38. That Respondent Emily Giske is a lobbyist with the state of New York as a qusai Public Officer as

a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest as an elector despite the

prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector to vote by Decmber 15,

2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner.

39. That were a Lobbyist registered in New York and any other similar representative similarly situated

to cast a vote a POTUS candidate that is not eligible for POTUS would infringe the trust due the People of

New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty.

And therefore their action as public officers is contrary and should lead to removal of Respondents license,

order fines levied under State Lobbying law, and crimnal investigation.

AS AND FOR THE FIFTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO also are

AN ELECTOR PUBLIC OFFICER ALSO HAVE DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF

LAW AND FACTS ABSENT A VIOLATION OF LAW MAY NOT VOTE FOR

WHOM THEY WISH BY CHANGING THE ELIGIBILITY OF POTUS.


with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that all public officers holding more

than one public officer job for pay excluding a commissioner of deeds or notary public with a fiduciary

duty attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications are in conflict with A2S1C2 and

A2S1C5 and are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to the People of the State of

New York; and



41. That each Elector is mandated by the State of New York legislature with exclusive power afforded

by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker,

146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification

requirements of a federal officer including that of office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514

U.S. 779 (1995) as apply to each respondent below:

42. That Respondent Robert Duffy is the incumbent 76th Lieutenant Governor of New York to


43. That Respondent Keith L.T. Wright is a incumbent Member of the New York State Assembly

from the 70th district to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

44. That Respondent Stephanie Miner is a incumbent 53rd Mayor of the city of Syracuse New York to


45. That Respondent Sheila Comar is a incumbent elected Executive committee chair of the New York

State Democratic Committee to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

46. That Respondent Joseph Morelle is a incumbent member of the New York State Assembly

representing the 132nd Assembly District, which includes eastern portions of the City of Rochester and the

Monroe County suburbs of Irondequoit and Brighton to participate as a member of the State of New York

electoral college

47. That Respondent Christine C. Quinn is a incumbent Speaker of the New York City Council

representing District 3 to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

48. That Respondent Ruben Diaz, Jr. is a incumbent President of the Borough of the Bronx in New

York City to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

49. That Respondent Ken Jenkins is a incumbent Westchester County 16th District legislator, and was

elected again Chairman of The Board of Legislators to participate as a member of the State of New York

electoral college

50. That Respondent Steve Bellone is a incumbent Suffolk County Executive to participate as a




51. That Respondent Felix Ortiz is a incumbent representing New York's 51st Assembly District to


52. That Respondent Anne Marie Anzalone is a incumbent appointed Chief of staff to Representative

Joe Crowley of the 7th New York Congressional District to participate as a member of the State of New


53. That Respondent William Thompson is a incumbent selected by the NYS Governor to head NYC's

Battery Park City Authority to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

54. That Respondent Scott Stringer is a incumbent 26th Borough President of Manhattan to participate

as a member of the State of New York electoral college

55. That Respondent Bill DeBlasio is a incumbent New York City elected official, holding the citywide

office of New York City Public Advocate to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral

college

56. That Respondent Byron Brown is a incumbent mayor of Buffalo, New York to participate as a


57. That Respondent Gerald D. Jennings is a incumbent mayor of Albany, New York to participate as

a member of the State of New York electoral college

58. That Respondent Archie Spigner is a incumbent District Leader for the 29th A.D. - Part A, and

Executive Member of the Guy R. Brewer United Democratic Club to participate as a member of the State of

New York electoral college

59. That although the following public officers are being questionably protected by the enormity of

Justice Schack invidious infringement of Petitioner basic rights otherwise protected by the US Constitution

and 14th Amendment guarantees and related State law with an order and decision taken on appeal case 2012-

5515 filing pending, the following public officers would be effected by a Court decision herein as follows:

a. That Andrew M. Cuomo is a incumbent 56th Governor of New York to participate as a member

of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS

Attorney General and an elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded to vote.



b. That Tom DiNapoli is a incumbent 54th Comptroller of the state of New York to participate as a

member of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as

the NYS Attorney General and an elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded to vote.

c. That Sheldon Silver is a incumbent Member of the New York State Assembly from the 64th

district and speaker of the assembly to participate as a member of the State of New York

electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS Attorney General and an

elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded anyway to vote.

d. That Eric Schneiderman is a incumbent 65th Attorney General of New York to participate as a


60. That all the above named Public Officer Respondents as the body and or its officers with

the expressed exception of private US Citizens as electors that failed or are about to perform a duty

enjoined upon it by the law of the land as to the requirement to conform to U.S. Constitution Article

2 Section 1 Paragraph 5 as to the eligibility requirements for any candidate for the office of the

POTUS; and


proceeding or is about to proceed without or in excess of jurisdiction to allow violation of NBC

Eligibility ; and


proceeding or is about to proceed despite the warning of the misprision of felony sedition and

treason are to be referred for criminal investigation and removal from office under New York Civil

Service Law Section 105;

63. That Respondent public officers as Elector Public Officers have duty as to matter of law and facts

and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due the People of New

York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty.



AS AND FOR THE SIXTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO AS THE

ELECTOR PRIVATE PERSON WITHOUT ANOTHER PUBLIC OFFICE AS AN

ELECTOR PUBLIC OFFICER ALSO HAVE DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW

AND FACTS BUT ABSENT A VIOLATION OF LAW MAY VOTE FOR WHOM

THEY WISH.


with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who as the

Elector private person without another public office as an Elector Public Officer also have duty as to matters

of law and facts but when absent a violation of law may vote for whom they wish.

65. That Respondent Irene Stein is a candidate past super delegate in the 2008 Democratic presidential

nomination and wife of Peter Stein the Tomkins County legislator for the 11th District to participate as a


66. That Respondent Walter Cooper is a candidate in an individual capacity as a citizen of New York

to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college

67. The Elector private person as a US Citizen without another public office as an Elector Public Officer

also have duty as to matter of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would

infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of

governement, Freedom and Liberty.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner wishes a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction

hearing, and Declaratory judgment under CPLR §7806 and permanent injunction against the

Respondents of each category and such other relief as the Court deems just including a TRO Order:

a. A hearing on the legal issues as to the void ab initio US Senate Election in New York..

b. A hearing on the issues of facts as to forgery, sedition and treason.

c. A hearing on the issues of the actual historical meaning of Natural Born Citizen held by

the State of New York from before and after the 1776




Exhibit 7



Exhibit 8

Back to Album · Donald J. Trump's Photos · Donald J. Trump's Page Previous · Next

Timeline Photos

Shared with:

Donald J. TrumpPress release. Video response to follow.Like · Comment · Share · November 1

Pamela Barnett, Linda Bentley and 16,445 others like this.

2,955 shares

Album: Timeline Photos

View Larger

Download

Report/Remove Tag

Public

Search for people, places and things Chr

(88) Timeline Photos https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152222524855725&set=a....

1 of 2 11/14/2012 9:25 PM

Donna Tryon And there is another explanation, the truth, forthis: he did produce the documents, they are real, and Mr. Trumpjust hasn't followed through on his offer and never will because herefuses to let go of his delusions about Pres. Obama.23 hours ago · Edited · Like · 3

Brett Abrams no22 hours ago · Like

William Chapman We Stand Behind you...This is the MostNefarious Individual in the U.S. Today Donald...Yes, the Majorityneeds to march on D.C. Soon!10 hours ago · Like

Rj Parsons wanted to let you know about a new petition Icreated on We the People,a new feature on WhiteHouse.gov, and ask for your support. Will youadd yourname to mine? If this petition gets 25,000 signatures by December14, 2012,the White House wil... See More

8 hours ago · Like

Michelle Matherne You are an idiot, Mr. Trump, You rail aboutChina stealing the US manufacturing jobs, yet your Macy's line ofties are all made in China! You come off as an ignorant buffoon. YOULOST, get over it.5 hours ago · Like

Yolita Mogollon de Ripoll Trump is such an idiot that hedoesn't know that if you are a foreigner it is harder to get financialaid for college, it is almost imposible you have to find a scholarshipbecause you cannot get it via the government.9 minutes ago · Edited · Like

Christopher Strunk http://www.scribd.com/doc/112747771/NOTICE-of-PETITION-INDEX-No-21948-2012-in-re-Complaint-of-attempt-to-commit-a-crime-by-NY-Public-Officers-in-the-2012-Electoral-College-and-to-VOIDa few seconds ago · Like

Write a comment...

Facebook © 2012 · English (US) About · Create an Ad · Create a Page · Deve

Chr

(88) Timeline Photos https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152222524855725&set=a....

2 of 2 11/14/2012 9:25 PM



Exhibit 9

State of Arizona

County of Maricopa

) ) ss. 1

AFFIDAVIT

I, the undersigned, being first duly sworn, do hereby state under oath and under penalty of perjury that the facts are true:

1. I am over the age of 18 and am a resident of Arizona. The information contained in this affidavit is based upon my own personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, could testify competently thereto. I am the duly elected Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, and I have been a law enforcement officer and official, in both state and federal government, for 5 1 years.

2. In August of last year, a group of citizens from the Surprise Arizona Tea Party organization met with me in my office and presented a petition signed by approximately 250 residents of Maricopa County, asking if I would investigate the controversy surrounding President Barrack Obama's birth certificate authenticity and his eligibility to serve as the President of the United States.

3. This group expressed its concern that, up until that point, no law enforcement agency in the country had ever gone on record indicating that they had either looked into this or that they were willing to do so, citing lack of resources and jurisdictional challenges.

4. The Maricopa County Sheriffs Office is in a rather unique position. Under the Arizona Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes, as the elected Sheriff of Maricopa County, I have the authority to request the aid of the volunteer posse, located in the county, to assist me in the execution of my duties. Having organized a volunteer posse of approximately 3,000 members, I, as the Sheriff of the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, can authorize an investigation go forward to answer these questions at virtually no expense to the tax payer.

5. The Cold Case posse agreed to undertake the investigation requested by the 250 citizens of Maricopa County. This posse consists of former police officers and attorneys who have worked investigating the controversy surrounding Barack Obama. The investigation mainly focused on the electronic document that was

presented as President Obama's long form birth certificate to the American people and to citizens of Maricopa County by the White House on April 27,201 1.

6. The investigation led to a closer examination of the procedures regarding the registration of births at the Hawaii Department of Health and various statements made by Hawaii government officials regarding the Obama birth controversy over the last five years.

7. Upon close examination of the evidence, it is my belief that forgery and fraud was likely committed in key identity documents including President Obama's long- form birth certificate, his Selective Service Registration card, and his Social Security number.

8. My investigators and I believe that President Obama's long-form birth certificate is a computer-generated document, was manufactured electronically, and that it did not originate in a paper format, as claimed by the White House. Most importantly, the "registrar's stamp" in the computer generated document released by the White House and posted on the White House website, may have been imported from another unknown source document. The effect of the stamp not being placed on the document pursuant to state and federal laws means that there is probable cause that the document is a forgery, and therefore, it cannot be used as a verification, legal or otherwise, of the date, place or circumstances of Barack Obama's birth.

9. The Cold Case Posse law enforcement investigation into Barack Obarna's birth certificate and his eligibility to be president is on-going. The on-going nature of the investigation is due to additional information that has come to light since we held the press conference in March, 2012. As soon as that information has been properly verified by the Cold Case Posse, I will release that information to the public.

Executed this Ld_ day of June, 20 1 Maricopa County, Arizona.

Joseph M. Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff

Sworn to and subsc ibed before me this \%?dayof $-lx\e ,2012.



Exhibit 10

THIS DOCUMENT AND THIS PRESIDENT ARE NOT LEGITIMATE I The important section of the Obama long form birth

certificate is displayed below and enlarged to fit this page. We have found 24 proofs of forgery on this document so far and are showing 5 areas of our easiest to understand evidence here. We are 2 typographers with a combined experience of 70 years creating and examining our own documents along with expertise in scanning, graphic arts, photography, reproduction, printing, and also including

the use of the old manual typewriters along with computer created documentation while starting and owning our own succesfull business' employing over 70 people. Alledgedly in 1961, a typewriter produced this document on a form, but the evidence shows us this birth certificate was created last year on a Macintosh computer, sending two copies of that form to the White House. The White house then posted a copy online and gave zerox copies to the media that

the source for our exam. Concern's about the :sident's izenship have peaked between Sept. 15&17,2012,

You.Gov ask 1000 Americans whether "Barack Obama was born in the US". The poll says 73 percent of Republicans and 40 percent overall either don't believe Obama was born in the U.S. or are not sure. For both Republicans and Americans, belief is that Obama is foreign-born. We have found this birth certificate to be a badly done forgery.

1. Mismatched Typed Letters Compare these typewriten letters enlarged from the birth certificate. We have marked

the ones chosen with a blue dot under the original letter. Of the 15 pairs chosen, one set is 2. The Stolen from the word "Student" that exhibits two different t v ~ e stvles of the "t" within the same - - - -

, I , word. These support our contention that the typed letters were copied and assembled Birth from different documents. Note the size Certificate differences. aa ee EE 66 A . Number These letters If someone decided last year to forge a birth certificate for a person, they would need a birth

certificate number that was issued in the 1961 era. A baby born the same day in Hawaii as have couldnot come AA I1 nnSS Barack Obama ... died the next day. We believe that babies number was 61 10641. The

from the same family requested her birth certificate and got the short form with a number way out of sequence. They then requested the long form and were refused. They brought a lawsuit typewriter. before the Hawaiian courts. It was denied, with the court explaining that the Honolulu Dept. of Health could decide if they wanted to provide the birth certificate of the deceased baby or

of forgery. not. But that is not the law in the state of Hawaii. a a>- - - - - % F g g & ~ ? ~ W W * ~ : ~ : ~ . y ~ .i, ?, fr' y.-->.--. ., .T

:c-. 5 v %l+i3ERTIFIC,ATE OF LIVE BIRTH HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

.,..,: A*:.: , -I

. I . I

r 2;. ,!,.,s '; ."',' ' - ' ., , ' , . ': L. , ,

ened & elarged to show the White Halo,i:;;ii. ' . .. . ~, . . NUMBER FILE

!z.sL:. *+ ,L2 A - ~ . ~ ~ . - -.: 2 L ?A, . - A - - ~- 151 61 10641 pe or ~g,n&l ..,,. . . ; ..?!$iddle . . . lc. L ~ e t Name

~iq$~~@~~@&,~~~$~?!,,l .. , . T . . , k*q ,%;. @:';:>:{xi; ,v.,,;: "*&! .,;'*, :";. . . - .i-

B A R A C ~ $ ~ ~ ~ t w+, HUSSZIN .? OBAMA, I1 t:!~$;,e,.?%:;iL> i h %jj ;j;;;;,;;- ; --. I.AW&.-, - s t . ..>. . . -. - .

36*sJ'hia , . , .Birth -~~~ rn . <...., - - .; . 4. If Twin or Triplet, * Y4.v .4;4,1 2 *& < -"$J < G$@YLp:%hy .+%, .,h a!jM , ,. - , - - Was Child - Born -

58. Birth Date

Month Day Year Sb, Hour

August I LL

Single Twin U TripletU ( let 2 n d d 3rd U . . City, Top c.- Rm.--l I ~ a - n : m - 7 I-

tce of Birth: a. V. ..u.aa L N I . o & a V I I 'j:

i ~ ; ~ : ; : ~ ~ ~ + p p ~ g ~ ~ ~ : ~ ; , ,+% " 2 l;gzA .?-I g+t ' &;SEE THE DIFFERENCES IN THE SPACE FROM "IJ'

. < ~ & b .< -+ . ; . . . - I.. ; . O k *=du ,THE WORD TO THE BASELINE OF THE FORM I b h ~ I \ I

mme of Hospital or Institution (If trot in hoebital or institution, give etreet address) 6d. Is Place of Birth Inside City or Town Lirnib?

Kapiolani Maternity a( Gym &.r --- ecolog? fial Hospital, - yeam NO

If no, give judicial dietrict

/ 7, qua1 Residence of Mother: City, Town or Rural Lpcation J7b. Island 1 7c. County and State or Foreip Gunt y

. , , ? * , - 9 1

vJb -d 9. y: i A .L< 3 ,a?- Ye': :. - 5q -: ~on~' .u$u< ---- O . . c . - . . ' - - - % - O a t . . ~ Honolulu -- --

z. IStreet . - Address 7e. Is Reeidence Ineide City or Town Limits? , <,G>

vi&pc: :.,, ,~2881~.::j 6085 Kala,l.anaoLe Highway ,give judicial district - + 7f. Mother's Mailing Address '-- . . ' : 7g. Is Reddeuce on a Farm or Plantation?

: e f b

t , ,I, .> *

. r L. '. - iz::

, , . , I % , , , .,3.,~y .- 2 PICAS .. a . :

& YCS NO@ i - 8. lFull Name of Father: : . .L . .::, .. 9. Race of Father

BARACK . . L a ' . . . OBATU Africa - HCTSSEIN < 10. Age of Father 11. Birthplace (Islarid, Sore or Foreign kunqy) 12az Usual Occupation 12b. Kind of Businees or Industry

25 Kenya, East Africa. Studen -iversity - 13. Full Maiden Name of Mother , 14. Race of Mother

STMJLEY ANN, DlmlAM Caucasian 15. Age of Mother 16. Birthplace (Island, State or Foreign Country)( 17s. Type of Occupation Outside Home During Pregnancy I l7b. Date Lut Worked -

4. Irregular Line Spacing Donald Trump's gift to the American This birth certificate form was designed for type- 3. The Start of Line Error writers, SO that every time the typist pulled a carriage - - . . - people was that it forced Obama to rush

The word "Kapiolani" should be exactly under the word "Male", not a half space indented. This is proof of forgery. Also the fact that not all the lines are flush to the left is suspicious. No other birth certificate exhibits this peculiar style.

return, it would advance down exactly 2 picas to match the form line for line. This was commom for all forms made for typewriters. We were unable to find another birth certificate from Hawaii with uneven line spacing like this one. Typewriters do not do this. This is proof of forgery.

out a torgery . In a sane world Congress would hold hearings and nullify everythine he did in office. As an usurper Obama can't be impeached, but should be pressed

5. The W h ite Ha I0 The white halo, seen on the online White House release is a white outline for the crimes of forgery & treason.

around everthing on the birth certificate. NO other birth certificate has this. See it on Exhibit "A" below Obamats legitimacy is empty of integrity. & Exhibit "B" showing how it should look. This was caused by the Adobe Photoshop filter used to sharpen edges. It does this by choking back the edge leaving a white halo. We show in Exhibit "C"

Now Congress has a "Duty to investigate" 4 . -

how we did the same thing to our specimen example. The Hawaiian Dept. of Health is supposed to have Or may Soon become an Accessory After put the original birth certificate on a copier and printed to a special green security paper instead of white paper. The only result possible from that is Exhibit "B", NOT exhibit "A". The halo proves that the the Fact to felony and high treason. forger combined a scan of the security paper on a computer ... flattened all of the elements in the file and then applied the Unsharp Mask. It is even on the birth certificate above ... see upper left corner. Since this is a direct copy of the birth certificate sent from Hawaii, that proves the white halo was on what they copied, so we must assume the Hawaiian original has it also. This is proof of forgery.

With purpose of evasion , Against the Constitution . This can not be ignored,

All parties have a " Duty to Object " hibi bit c Exhibit B with

h a t .tU;+aro Mask aoi

A -

Lady Liberty and the American people have a right to know the Truth about

Their President. Paul lrey & Douglas Vogt 2012

Congress failing to investigate this forgery is neglecting their constitutional "Duty to Object'!

3

VideosBallot News BlogFILING A COMPLAINT

Search here

Posted by By GeorgeM at 24 October, at 01 : 49 AM Print

Paul was a trial witness and an early exposer of the Obama (long form) birth certificate forgery

Via David LaRocque:

I just returned to Florida last night from testifying at the trial against Obama’s elligibility as the presidentialdebate was going on in Boca Raton. You have reported the trial accurately. What was your source?

Like 5 Send

Paul Irey Statement on Indiana Ballot Challenge Trial http://obamaballotchallenge.com/paul-irey-statement-on-indiana-ballot-ch...

1 of 4 11/14/2012 9:10 PM

I might add that the judge had experience using typewriters … as I understand from local people. This isvery good for us as I am sure she understood my evidence that was mostly about the impossible typewritererrors on the Obama birth certificate. There was an audience … and many of them congratulated me after thetestimony. One witness was with Army Intelligence and had good testimony also but was unable to testify asshe was last just after me.

At the conclusion of my testimony … judge Reid had to end the trial because of an appointment. This judgewas fair and overruled countless objections from the two government attorneys representing Obama. In factwhen I began to testify … they both got out of their seats and came over to stand about 5 feet away from meseeming concerned … as did Orly and Greg. Fortunately I had previously explained my testimony to Greg whenwe first met at a federal express office just before he drove Orly and I to the court building. Greg Black did anexcellent job by the way … and was exactly what Orly needed to assist her in this very tough environment.

There appeared to be about 20 to 25 audience members and there were actually 4 … not 2 witness’s who hadattended to present their testimony and did so in my presence at the 3 hour mock trial we had … just off themain lobby of the University Plaza hotel the night before. My four 30 wide by 20 deep exhibits were enteredinto evidence and remained with the court. I am going to attach them here. I was not given enough time topresent all of my evidence. The time was a problem because of the constant objections and long dissertations bythe government lawyers which took one and a quater hours … so Judge Reid allowed the following hour forevidence to be presented … extending the trial 15 minutes until 12:15. It had started at 10 am.

There was no easel available to put my exhibits on. At first I held the first two exhibits in my hand and afterthat … Orly held the other 4. All my testimony was a direct answer to Orly’s questions. The only significantquestions from the government attorneys was if I knew the make and model typewriter used to type the birthcertificate and did I have “personal” knowledge of the methods used in 1961 at the Health Dept. in Honolulu …to which I had to answer no. I made my testimony in a clear direct assertive manner … confident that I wascorrect and I think the judge was impressed.

When the government attorneys objected that I was not an expert witness … the 65 year old lady judgeanswered that objection instead of Orly … “He said he had 57 years experience.” At the beginning when askedby Orly what my qualifications were … I had replied that I had … in the U.S. Air Force … from 1955 to 1958… almost four years experience typing forms … two of which were at the National Security Agency for which Iwas given a Top Secret security clearance followed by 9 years after my discharge … being employed by HearstCorp. and three advertising agencies before I formed my own company in 1968.

Not testified to because of the time constrains … but I intended to mention … was that my company …Bergen Graphics Inc. was incorporated in the spring of 1968 and in its peak by the late 80 s … employed 60people.

Orly had forgotten to leave three of the exhibits with the judge. One was the blow-up of the important partof the Obama birth certificate that I had used to point out the line over line spacing irregularities and anotherpage with the pic of my typewriter showing a bent “H” key … seen on the mismatched letters proof … a blowup of many “a”s typed on my own Olivetti – Underwood 5 … demonstrating how a typewriter was a precisioninstrument that typed letters always perfectly aligned vertically and horizontally and another pic showing howtwo keys could get stuck together and require being pulled apart manually causing the bent letters that havebeen proven in court in the past to positively identify any particular typewriter due to its unique assortment ofbent letters. Also undelivered to the judge on that page … was a pic of my own Underwood 5 typewriter … anda pic of the same typewriter from the internet claiming that this was a “long-time standard of gov. agencies,newsrooms, and offices.


2 of 4 11/14/2012 9:10 PM

Most of my testimony was similar to the newspaper page we had published in the Washington Times a weekbefore … and Orly should have entered that in evidence also but forgot … but I don’t blame her as she had herhands full responding to what seemed to me to be the overbearing best lawyers the government could provide.

The “Baseline Errors” evidence is new and not in the Wash. Times page because I had just discovered it thispast Sat. before I flew to Indianapolis. What I did first was type a test of the particular way the old manualtypewriters shifted from lower case to caps. The entire mechanism holding the keys moves down when the shiftkey is held down … causing the cap letter to strike in place of the lower case letter because both characters areon the same key. It was considered a great innovation when this method was first employed on a typewriterbecause it allowed for cheaper manufacturing.

However if the typist did not press the shift key completely down before the letter was struck … the resultwould be a cap typed letter a bit higher than the baseline of the word. Also less common would be when a letterwas typed before the shift key was fully released that would cause the following lower case letter to be lowerthan the baseline. Once I had established that rule … I decided to check the baselines of everything on thecertificate to see if any cap letter was below the baseline of a word and if any lower case letter was above thebaseline of a word … which was impossible. I found 4 lower-case letters … marked with red arrows … thatwere above the baselines of the word they were included in … and this all by itself proved forgery because thatis absolutely impossible for any manual typewriter since the mechanism does not allow that. I found no capsthat were lower than the baseline. Then along in addition that evidence … I found seven of the nine lines on theObama birth certificate had words that were on the same line … but contained whole words or parts of wordsthat did not align with the rest. Also impossible for a typewriter unless the typist were to release the roller andadjust the position up or down manually … and why would any typist do that for no good reason in the middleof typing a single line on a form? This proves forgery in two individual ways and shows us that no typewriterdid it … but that it most likely was all a result of the letter being positioned by eye … probably on a computermonitor using Adobe Photoshop. This was new evidence no one had found before … and I was elated that Ihad discovered another separate proof of my contention that it was a computer created document.

The last three documents attached here are the two mistakenly not given to the judge.

Except for a completely controlled major media … I could absolutely prove this to the American voterright now with my testimony and my cards … a pointer … and camera zooms. And remember that thisevidence was accepted in a Superior court in the state of Indiana … from me as a person now recognized asan expert witness … for the purpose of not allowing Obama votes to be counted because he has not provenhis citizenship.

I have a bad feeling that if judge Reid rules in favor of Orly … the media will not report it … as they havenot reported this important trial … and also not reporting that Obama was served a subpoena to produce hisoriginal birth certificate and come to Indiana to answer these serious charges of forgery … a contention iftrue … also amounts to treason.

And if for some technical reason the Judge declines to rule against Obama … then the media WILL fullyreport it with the expected usual headline:

PROOF OBAMA BORN IN HAWAII … JUDGE THROWS OUT CASE!

A Headline I found on FOX NEWS in 2008 when a judge ruled against a plaintiff because of his not having“STANDING” … meaning that Obama had not harmed him personally. So FOX lied … giving the impressionthat the judge had heard evidence but he actually had not … and I would know the word “standing” should havebeen mentioned as part of that story.


3 of 4 11/14/2012 9:10 PM

Paul Irey

More on Indiana

Post to FacebookPost to

dd i k dBallot News Blog, Indiana News, UncategorizedPerformance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE


4 of 4 11/14/2012 9:10 PM



Exhibit 11

VideosBallot News BlogFILING A COMPLAINT

Search here

Posted by By Pamela Barnett at 6 November, at 07 : 19 AM Print

Barack Obama Did Not Have to Undergo Any Background Checks to Become President or Gain AccessTo Top Secret Information Because It was Not Required Adjudication of Publicly Available Information Proves Obama Would Never Be Granted A SecurityClearance If He Had To Qualify For OneBy CPT Pamela Barnett, U.S. Army Retired(Use of rank does not imply endorsement or approval of the Department of Defense or U.S. Army)Obama never had to prove his ability to legally work in the United States or had to submit to a securityclearance background investigation…. Ever!!! Shockingly the reason is that it is not required. This statement isproven in the recently released book Obama Never Vetted: The Unlawful President, The National Security

Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background ... http://obamaballotchallenge.com/unvetted-obama-never-had-to-undergo-s...

1 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM

Loopholes and Ensuing Conspiracy. I have had many years of experience working with the security clearanceprocess as an officer in the Army. One of my job positions was as the battalion intelligence staff officer where Iwas in charge of security clearances and physical security for a unit of 400 people.I became unnerved at all of the suspect relationships of Obama in the 2008 campaign. When Obama was swornin, I knew that there could not be a security check requirement because Obama wouldn’t pass. I began myresearch into the presidential vetting process only to find that there are no requirements of even vetting theminimum qualifications to become President, only a couple times where vetting is optional: with Congress whencertifying the election results and with the states as a matter of ballot access. No federal agency is required tocheck into a Presidential candidate or President Elects’ background.This CIA page snap shot, clearly states that President, Senator and Representatives do not have to qualify for asecurity clearance. They are just given one because they were elected… Unfortunately for the security of theU.S. voters are not privy to a candidates’ critical background information so they cannot fully evaluate acandidate’s trustworthiness .From the Central Intelligence Agency’s report How Intelligence-Sharing Works at Present (2007);https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/sharing-secrets-with-lawmakers-congress-as-a-user-of-intelligence/3.htm

From the CIA website link above –In GeneralAll Members of Congress have access to intelligence by virtue of their elected positions. They do not receivesecurity clearances per se.The Office of Personnel Management for the federal government also states that the federal government doesnot do a background check into Presidents, yet they do a background check for everyone else working in theWhite House. See OPM letter below.


2 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM

Because Obama’s background was not vetted by any federal agency, I adjudicated his background usingpublicly available information and the federal guidelines for adjudicating an applicant for access to classifiedinformation. My conclusion is that Obama would be denied a clearance if he had to qualify for one.Here’s the Obama Adjudication report from Obama Never Vetted: The Unlawful President….

Obama Security Clearance Adjudication Preliminary Analysis Begins HereObama did not contribute to this analysis.

Information was obtained from sources linked within analysis.

(Appendix Contains Federal Forms that All other Federal Employees Except The Constitutionally ElectedEmployees Have to Complete at End of Chapter)

(1) Guideline A: Allegiance to the United StatesConcern 1 – Obama born with British/Kenyan Allegiance through legal father Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.Concern 2 – Obama became Indonesian and developed Indonesian allegiance through adopted father whileliving overseas in Indonesia. (according to Indonesian School records from AP.)Concern 3 – No proof that Obama has renounced citizenship to either country. (President of the U.S. onlyposition that requires sole allegiance to the United States (ie: Natural Born Citizen requirement in Constitution,Article II, Section 1, Clause 5)Concern 4 – Obama supports actions of Islamic caliphate in Arab world instead of promoting seculardemocracies run by the people of the country in an effort to continue Middle Eastern allies. Obama was raisedin the Islamic religion and shows a preference to Islamic rule in the middle east which compromises the securityof the United States. Obama’s adviser Dalia Mogahed is a Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer. It is the expressgoal of the Muslim Brotherhood to bring the entire world under Islamic government and Sharia law – including


3 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM

the United States.Muslim Brotherhood and Obama: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sL6JK55ql1EObama’s Pro Muslim Brotherhood Advisor Dalia Mogahed: http://frontpagemag.com/2010/nonie-darwish/appeasing-the-muslim-brotherhood/Obama gives billions of tax payer money to Muslim Brotherhood to Buy Weapons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2S1mJAxMzAObama spends $770 million to help foreign mosques http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHwPrXsw0Ag&playnext=1&list=PLCCEBB0C000B35B07&feature=results_mainConcern 5 - Regarding 4(C )(1)(2)(4) Long- time friend of Bill Ayers, Member of the Weather Underground,which wanted to overthrow the United States, The Weather Underground was responsible for multiple murdersand bombings of federal government buildings. Ayers has been quoted as saying he wishes he could have donemore. Recently an affidavit was signed by the mailman for the Bill Ayer’s family house which stated that theAyers family paid for Obama’s college and said that Obama was a foreign student. So Obama has been closelyassociated with Bill Ayers for about 30 years. He wasn’t just a man in the neighborhood as Obama hasrepeatedly espoused to the electorate of the U.S.: http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/postman-ayers-family-put-foreigner-obama-through-school/#ooid=E0ZGg2NDqsd2ZwNHinIhhgXegZkT00X1Concern 6 – Obama associates William Ayers Bernadine Dohrn, Tom Hayden and Carl Davidson were involvedin espionage against the United States on behalf of communist Cuba according to FBI files.http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/5860http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2322From DiscoverTheNetworks-Carl Davidson and Tom Hayden take credit for having launched in 1969 the “Venceremos Brigades,” whichcovertly transported hundreds of young Americans to Cuba to help harvest sugar cane and interact withHavana’s communist revolutionary leadership. (The Brigades were organized by Fidel Castro’s Cubanintelligence agency, which trained “brigadistas” in guerrilla warfare techniques including the use of arms andexplosives.)from Canada Free Press story-Unrepentant terrorist former leading Weather Underground Organization (WUO) member William Ayers wasaided by Fidel Castro’s Cuba in the 1970s, according to a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) report.The 400-page report, a copy of which was obtained by the New York Times, revealed that Cubanintelligence officers in the General Directorate of Intelligence (known by its initials in Spanish as the DGI,Cuba’s equivalent of the CIA) set up the Venceremos Brigades in which WUO members participated. “The ultimate objective of the DGI’s participation in the setting up of the Venceremos Brigades was “therecruitment of individuals who are politically oriented and who someday may obtain a position, electiveor appointive, somewhere in the U.S. Government, which would provide the Cuban Government withaccess to political, economic and military intelligence.”(Italics CFP’s). bold underlines by author.Obama is linked to Ayers by working with him directly in multiple progressive foundations and Obama is linkedto Carl Davidson from his involvement in The New Party in Illinois. Obama is closely linked with Tom Hayden( http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2012/05/14/obamas-connections-to-the-violent-sds-tom-hayden/) who also hasan FBI file for his subversive activities against the United States. Hayden has a 22,000 page FBI file.http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/books/review/subversives-by-seth-rosenfeld.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0In the mid-1990s Davidson was a major player in the Chicago branch of the New Party, a socialist politicalcoalition whose members hailed largely from the Committees of Correspondence, the Democratic Socialists ofAmerica, and ACORN. Davidson first met Barack Obama through the New Party, which endorsed Obama’scampaign for the Illinois state senate in 1996.Concern 7 – Regarding 4(a)Raised money and campaigned for Ralia Odinga who sought to be elected in Kenya, a fellow member of the Luo Tribe member. Odinga is an avowed communist and signed an agreement with aMuslim group in his country to not assist America and other nations with the apprehension and extradition ofterrorists while under the counsel of Obama.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnfsF-9h4LI&feature=channel&list=UL


4 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tHUbtrpFeU&list=UUY8sdsGPYCgy8XrVT-mPX4g&index=7&feature=plcpObama’s actions could be strongly construed to be a payoff for possibly hiding or destroying something inKenya- like a birth certificate perhaps. Note: Why else would Obama be travelling to another continent andadvising him unless he was getting something in return?Concern 6 – Regarding section 4(a), Obama in his own autobiography admits that he was mentored byCommunist Party member Frank Marshall Davis who was working directly for the Soviet Union to overthrowthe Republican system of government. Frank Marshall Davis has a large FBI surveillance file and would havebeen arrested for espionage if the U.S. went to open war with the Soviet Union. The following are some linksthat contain parts of the FBI file onSources: Autobiography, http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/hawaii-obama.pdf, http://www.usasurvival.org/marshall.fbi.files.htmlConcern 7 – Obama wants a new system of government fascism instead of the freedoms guaranteed in theConstitution, the Constitution which is his job to defend and uphold. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge3aGJfDSg4&feature=player_embeddedMitigating Factors – None. No mitigation has been done by Obama, in fact he has spent $10 million in U.S.tax payer dollars to pass a new Kenyan Constitution to instill Muslim Sharia law and legalize abortions inKenya. He continues relationships and courses of action which are of great concern. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlboSRT5kYo&feature=player_embedded#!)

(2) Guideline B: Foreign InfluenceKenyaConcern 1 – Obama states he was born in Kenya until 2007 while stating also he was born in Hawaii. Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeYUwlLrl3wConcern 2 – Regarding section 7(a)(b), Obama took U.S. tax payer money to help write and pass a pro-Sharia,pro-abortion Constitution that would also allow him to become President in Kenya. Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlboSRT5kYoConcern 3 -Obama is influenced by his Kenyan fellow citizens. He also has substantial profit from foreigncompanies in his 2011 tax return. Members of the Kenyan government have stated on the record that Obamawas born in Kenya, found it amazing that a non-native of America could become President of the United States. Sources;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_8PC3oKAvAConcern 4 – Regarding section 7(a)(b), Obama has very close ties to Ralia Odinga who promoted violence whenhe lost his election and signed agreement to not cooperate with the U.S. regarding terrorism. Obama acts as if heowes something personally to Ralia Odinga by raising $1 million dollars and campaigning for him even though itis against the Logan Act.IndonesiaA retired postal worked signed affidavit that Obama was a Indonesian student in college. Question – Obamahides his college records most likely to hide his Indonesian citizenship as an adult and/or hide who paid for hiscollege? This must be further investigated and all college records examined.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwoNpP35pXIhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_162767&feature=iv&src_vid=IwoNpP35pXI&v=ql20v23KnIY?Obama allowed by Executive Order billionaire James Riyadi a fellow Indonesian convicted of breaking U.S.campaign finance laws by funneling millions of dollars illegally to President Bill Clinton to enter the countryafter Congress had banned him from entry.Regarding 7(i), a trip to Pakistan with a Pakistani national at time when Pakistan was at war with the SovietUnion in 1981.Mitigating Conditions: None. None of these relationships could be construed as casual or unsubstantial


5 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM

because large amounts of money were raised on Obama’s behalf to help Odinga, funneled millions of dollars toKenya, and special treatment for a criminally convicted billionaire who owns the largest coal mining business inIndonesia by signing an Executive Order to allow him in the country. Regarding the Pakistan trip, Obama wouldhave to have been interviewed to know length of stay, all foreign contacts and what he was doing there at a timeof turmoil.Some questions – Why would Obama not instead be campaigning to raise money for himself instead of Odinga? What possible benefit would Odinga be to Obama? Could it be the purported missing birth record of Obama inKenya (by Kenyan government)? Why is Obama allowing a convicted felon banned by Congress to enter theU.S. to come right in? Is it his special feeling of allegiance to Indonesia? Why have Kenyan official stated intheir legislative sessions that Obama was born in Kenya?

(3) Guideline C: Foreign Preference9. The Concern. When an individual acts in such a way as to indicate a preference for a foreign country overthe United States…Regarding section 10(a)(1), Possession of a current foreign passport. The following link has excellentadditional information on dual citizenship and foreign passports. http://www.clearancejobs.com/cleared-news/91/dual-citizenship-and-security-clearancesObama’s passport records were compromised by an employee of his now head of Terrorism John Brennan. TheOffice of Inspector General did a lengthy report on the breach but only released about half of the report to thepublic. Then Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice said that she could not guarantee that anything was added toor taken from the passport databases regarding Obama’s file.The Pakistani equivalent to the U.S. Civil Service exam had Obama being born in Kenya, this could be becauseObama may have used a Kenyan passport when he traveled to Pakistan. Obama was also taken off his mother’s(Stanley Ann Dunham) passport as a child while living in Indonesia as an Indonesian citizen according toIndonesian grade school records obtained from the Associated Press.Regarding section 10(5), using Foreign citizenship to protect financial or business interests in another country –Obama has never produced any school records (AP News produced Indonesian grade school record) Occidentalhas said that Obama had been on scholarship there. Normally that would mean decent grades, but Obama hashidden his records for Occidental, Columbia and Harvard. Khalid al Mansour, a radical Muslim who isanti-Christian and anti-Jew, and an agent for a Saudi Prince who owns a large percentage of Fox News(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIVO8MZYXo8) raised money for and helped Obama to get into Harvard.Mitigating Conditions – None, Obama continues to hide his college and middle and high school records. All ofthese school records need to be examined.President of the United States is to have no other citizenships to best try to ensure sole allegiance to the UnitedStates.(4) Guideline D: Sexual Behavior13. Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying:Obama has been accused of being a “member” of the Down Low Club and of having sexual relationships withmen by Larry Sinclair in his book , the mother of a murdered gay man Donald Young, a fellow Trinity Churchmember, and now others from Trinity church in Chicago. There is more than once accusation from more than 3people. Whether or not Obama is gay, he could be subject to coercion, exploitation or duress which could be adisqualifying condition of its own.http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/another-boost-for-obamas-gay-accuser/http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/jesse-jackson-wright-arranged-obama-marriage/http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/trinity-church-members-reveal-obama-shocker/Mitigating Conditions – Further investigation would need to be done of the people making the accusations andof Obama.(5) Guideline E: Personal ConductRegarding Section 16(d)(3), Obama lied on his Attorney application for the state of Illinois. He stated underpenalty of perjury that he had not been known by any other names when he was known by at least 4 other


6 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM

names: Soebarkah, Barry Soetoro, Barack Hussein Obama II and Junior.Obama is a serial liar, which shows he cannot be trusted. Here are only some of the many lies told by Obama.: http://obamalies.net/list-of-liesRegarding Section (g), Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, Tony Rezko, Frank Marshall Davis, Khalid al Mansour,and Ralia Odinga are/were associates of Obama. All are either criminals or have advocated for the overthrow ofthe U.S. government.Mitigating Conditions: None. Behaviors continue.(6) Guidline F: Financial Considerations18. The Concern. Affluence that cannot be explained by known sources of income is also a security concern. Itmay indicate proceeds from financially profitable criminal acts.(h)unexplained affluence , as shown by lifestyle or standard of living , increase of net worth , or money transfersthat cannot be explained by subject’s known legal sources of income.Convicted felon Tony Rezko who was a fundraiser for Obama, had secured a property and home purchase forthe Obama’s far below the market value. Rezko’s attorney is listed as the owner of the property. This is veryindicative of bribery, tax fraud and Senate ethics violations. (http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2008/12/obamas-house-is-owned-by-rezkos-lawyer.html)The financing of Obama’s education would also need to be further investigated to determine the nature of thedeal between Al Mansour and Saudi Arabian citizens.Mitigating Conditions: None(7) Guideline G: Alcohol ConsumptionNot rated/Unknown By Adjudicator(8) Guideline H: Drug InvolvementObama has admitted to using several illegal drugs in his books and another allegation of his using drugs wasmade by Larry Sinclair (See also Guideline G: Sexual Behavior for more on Sinclair).: http://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obama-Larry-Sinclair-Cocaine/dp/0578013878Mitigating Conditions: Further investigation required and polygraph test.(9) Guideline I: Psychological ConditionsNot rated, but recommend mental evaluation due to serial lying.(10) Guideline J: Criminal ConductRegarding section 31(c), allegation or admission of criminal conduct, regardless of whether the person wasformally charged, formally prosecuted or convicted.Forged BC, Selective Service Registration(Draft Card), and Use Of Not Assigned SSNA background check of publicly released “documents” by Obama reveal non-authentic, altered otherwise forgeddocuments. Forged birth certificate and Selective Service Forgery – see Hawaii Chapter in Sheriff Arpaio’sreport. A background check of Obama’s Social Security Numbers and addresses would have revealed extremelylikely criminal behavior that should be turned over to a special prosecutor as the DOJ has proven to be apolitical animal not concerned with the rule of law and not trustworthy in matters of national security.Mitigating Condition: None. Crime is ongoing as Obama continues to use a SSN not assigned to him, aSelective Service Registration made fraudulently after the deadline, and continues to have a birth certificateforgery posted at whitehouse.gov. A full inestigation would have to be done to sort out all of the signs ofcriminal fraud encompassing Obama.(11) Guideline K: Handling Protected InformationObama’s White House has leaked a vast amount of information that endangers the U.S. and our allies accordingto Congresmen and Senator Diane Feinstein.: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VPd0YpN8E8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNh9O_2fyp8Mitigating Conditions: None as Obama has not taken responsibility or taken action to stop leaks.(12) Guideline L: Outside ActivitiesNot rated by Adjudicator because other criteria regarding applicant more than enough to deny clearance toapplicant Obama.(13) Guideline M: Use of Information Technology Systems


7 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM

Concern 1 -Obama used the federal government website whitehouse.gov to post a forged birth certificatedocumentConcern 2 – Has used federal government computers to spy on Americans that do not agree with his policieswith [email protected] actions prove that Obama has no respect for rules and regulations regarding government computeraccess; cannot use computers for personal use or to commit a crime.Mitigating Conditions: None. Birth certificate forgery remains at www.whitehouse.gov

CONCLUSIONSecurity clearance denied to applicant Barack Obama for massive complex unresolved issues that present agreat potential threat to national security. Forwarding file to special prosecutor for investigation of criminalactivity.

************************************************End ofReport***********************************************

Author: Pamela Barnett’s book Obama Never Vetted: The Unlawful President, The National SecurityLoopholes and Ensuing Conspiracy That Endanger America is available at Amazon.com.

Ballot News Blog background check, birth certificate, forged, forgery, never vetted, obama, security clearancePerformance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE


8 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM



Exhibit 12

-----~----------

Thursday, 8 November 2012-70th Anniversary OPERATION TORCH - World War II NorthwestAfrica - Casablanca

From: Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III United States Navy Retired

To:

• Robert Swan Mueller, III, Director - Federal Bureau of Investigation,Washington D.C. (ORIGINAL)

• The Foreman of the two sitting Federal Grand Juries sitting inKnoxville, Tennessee via William C. Killian, U.S. Attorney forTennessee's Easter District

SUBJECT: FORMAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS NAMING BARACKHUSSEIN OBAMAIN COMMISSION OF TREASON!

1. OBAMA represents a clear and present danger to U.S. national security,to the U.S. Constitution and to our Republican form of government.OBAMA IS A FOREIGN BORN DOMESTIC ENEMY! OBAMA is workingassiduously to destroy America! No document record exists showingBarack Hussein OBAMA to be a United States citizen.

2. OBAMApaid money and aided and abetted Al-Qaeda members andgroups that attacked Americans on U.S. territory in Benghazi, Libya on11 and 12September 2012.Al-Qaeda is the jihadist terrorist organizationthat attacked the United States on 11 September 2001.

3. Pro-jihadist and Islamist OBAMApersonally denied frantic cries for helpfrom Americans in mortal danger throughout a 7-hour attack byapproximately 150heavily armed known jihadists. OBAMAwatched fourAmericans die in real time. OBAMA is allowing our enemies to slaughterour servicemen piecemeal at the same time ordering our troops to disarm.

4. OBAMA lies to the American people about his TREASON with everyopportunity. OBAMA is lying to the American people about the 11-12September attack in Benghazi, Libya in a cover story intended to protectOBAMA from facing a criminal prosecution and conviction.

5. OBAMA is personally responsible for the 6 August 2011 shoot-down of anArmy CH-47D Chinook helicopter in Afghanistan. 17 Navy SEALS died.All 5 men of the Chinook crew died. 3 Air Force special tactics airmen

died. 5 men of a Navy support force died. OBAMA and his gang of outlawslie to the America people about that.

6. In commission of TREASON OBAMAis engaged in purchasing andsupplying guns, heavy weapons, high-powered munitions and explosivesto foreign aggressors-AMERICA'S ENEMIES-around the globe.OBAMAhas and continues to ship weapons from Libya to Syria throughTurkey. Some weapons may be being directly shipped to Syria.Christopher Stevens was OBAMA's point man of this operation whenStevens was murdered in Benghazi during the attack of 11-12 September2012. In this TREASON OBAMAis arming America's enemies: Al-Qaedaand the Muslim Brotherhood connected Syrian rebels.

7. As an Act of TREASON OBAMAprovides safe-haven and sanctuary tothose bent on the destruction of the United States, its people, and its formof government. OBAMAencourages, facilitates and arms our enemies tocarry out a WAR on the United States from enemy bases set up in thehomeland and around the globe. OBAMA aids and abets these knownenemy forces to establish and strike from strongholds OBAMA allowsestablished on American soil.

8. OBAMArefuses to pledge his allegiance to the United States.OBAMAconspires with leaders of countries, groups and organizationsbent upon the destruction ofAmerica. By so doing OBAMAengages inTREASON against the United States in every aspect of TREASON.

9. As an Act of TREASON OBAMAbroke into and occupies the White Houseby force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, dissembling and deceit.OBAMAis an undocumented illegal alien and spy. Posing as an imposterpresident and commander-in-chief OBAMA strips civilian command andcontrol over the military establishment. Known military criminal actors-command racketeers such as Martin Dempsey-are free in the exercise ofan extra-military government intent upon the destruction of ourRepublican, constitutional form of governance. There are dozens of seniormilitary commanders no more obedient to the United States Constitutionthan is OBAMA.

10. OBAMAis joined in his TREASON by a raft of civilian criminalassistants too numerous to name in this submission. I leave it to theGrand Jury, in the conduct of an independent, autonomous, andunfettered investigation, to assign specificity and particularity to the listof OBAMA'S co-conspiring outlaws.

11. OBAMA is a FOREIGN BORN DOMESTIC ENEMY, an infiltrator, a

2

~------------ - -- ------

traitor and a spy. OBAMA installed and operates a government thatrivals and competes with our U.S. Constitution. OBAMA operatesgovernment not found in our United States Constitution. If not arrestedOBAMA will continue to commit TREASON. OBAMA is emboldened nowand more dangerous to this country's survival as a constitutionalRepublic than any other threat the United States faces in the world.

12. We come now to this reckoning: I accuse Barack HusseinOBAMA of TREASON. I accuse OBAMA'S military-political criminalassistants of TREASO N. Their criminal mischief is recognized asTREASON in pure form. I expose and identify OBAMA and his criminalassociates as TRAITORS (Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Leon Panetta,Susan Rice, David Petraeus and Martin Dempsey but a few).

13. It needs be said out loud and relentlessly: OBAMA is aiding and abettingAmerica's enemies. OBAMA is lying to the American people in everyregard going to OBAMA'S TREASONOUNS escapades. OBAMA IS ACLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THESE UNITED STATES OFAMERICA!

14.This submission renews and extends all previous filings naming OBAMAin commission of TREASON dating from 17 March 2009. The list of ACTSof OBAMA'S TREASON found in this formal criminal complaint is notexhaustive. Far from it.

15. My sworn duty is to stand against everything OBAMA stands for. TheFOREIGN BORN DOMESTIC ENEMY OBAMA IS NOT MYPRESIDENT! HE IS NOT MY COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF!

"This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But itis perhaps, the end of the beginning."

3

Obedient to my oath to the United States Constitution in submission of thiscriminal complaint for TREASON I remain stead fast and,

BORN FIGHTING,

~1!:!~:lf!~'~~[}//United States Navy Retired

Distribution wide

Sworn and issued before me

this 8th day of November 2012

at /(/X/J3 hours local (14:¢>Ja.m. EST)

4

.


Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s MEMORANDUM in support of OSC

Exhibit 13

From:

To:

Private R...

Sunday, August 15, 2010 9:34 PM Private Report to Elias Aoun"Eric Phelps" <[email protected]>

"Christopher Strunk" <[email protected]>

1 File (747KB)

Here it is. If you need it in PDF let me know.

Page 1 of 1Private Report to Elias Aoun - Yahoo! Mail

8/16/2010http://us.mc576.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=21&filt...

1

Private Report to Elias Aoun Attempted Answers to Specific Questions

And the Fate of Lebanon as per the Design of the Society of Jesus

Warning: The conclusions of this report are private and the personal property of Elias Aoun. No part of this report will be released by the author to any third party without a specific directive from Elias Aoun. Before commencing the body of this text, the author recommends the reading of his book, Vatican Assassins: “Wounded In The House Of My Friends.” Therein, the reader will be informed, fact-by-fact, as to the origin and perfection of the Jesuit Superior General’s International Intelligence Community. That Community is overseen by the pope’s Sovereign Military Order of Malta headquartered in Rome and directed by its Grand Master, Andrew Bertie. Thus, the Jesuit General, also known as “the Black Pope,” controls the entirety of the American Intelligence Community, including but not limited to, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Office of Naval Intelligence as well as the intelligence arms of the Army and the Air Force. An accurate understanding of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 overseen by Knight of Malta Francis Cardinal Spellman further confirms the reality of a unified American Intelligence Community, which is the foundation for the pope’s International Intelligence Community, including Nazi-founded INTERPOL and Soviet KGB/FSB. This Unified International Intelligence Community was built during Rome’s Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945) and perfected during Rome’s subsequent Cold War (1945-1990). A brief chronology will be now provided as a summary of events of the Twentieth Century as covered in detail in Vatican Assassins: “Wounded In The House Of My Friends,” third edition, enclosed herein as a gift to Elias Aoun.

2

1. During the Black Pope’s World War I, called “The Great War,” the Protestant German Empire (the Second Reich) was destroyed. On its ruins, the Roman Catholic German Third Reich would be erected, fully prepared to fulfill the Order’s Council of Trent in killing accursed “heretics and liberals” throughout Europe and Jesuit-ruled Russia (alias, “U.S.S.R.”), the Order having been formally readmitted into Russia by Lenin after its legal expulsion by Tzar Alexander I in 1820. During this time Jesuit Nazi fascism, overseen by a separate Jesuit entity called the SS, would be united with Islam in that calculated destruction. It was for this reason that Hitler and Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Haj Amin al-Husseini worked together from 1941 to 1945 while based in the once Protestant, then apostate, Masonically-ruled city of Berlin. The collusion between Jesuit Nazi Fascism, Jesuit Soviet Communism, Islam and Labor Zionism is undeniable, all four factions being ruled by the Black Pope via high-level, illuminized Freemasonry and financed by the Knights of Malta directing the pope’s International Banking Cartel based in the Old City of London and New York City. Therefore, we should not be surprised to see the pope’s Lebanese Intelligence Service (overseen by the Jesuit Provincial in Beirut) secretly working with Islamic intelligence commanders of several factions, including Saudi Arabia, for the ultimate destruction of both papal and non-papal Christians in Lebanon. As the majority of Bible-reading Christians have been purged from Iraq under the guise of the Order’s “War on Terror,” even so will it be in Lebanon. 2. During the Black Pope’s World War I, the Masonically-ruled, Islamic Ottoman Empire would be defeated and dismembered after Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors Sultan Abdul Hamid II and Kaiser Wilhelm II (who had fired anti-Jesuit, Masonic Prince Bismarck) carried out the pope’s Armenian Genocide, murdering nearly two million non-papal Christians via the Grand Orient Lodge’s Masonic “Young Turks.” The tool of the Society of Jesus to bring this massacre to pass was its Masonically-directed, apostate Protestant

3

British Empire (ruled by Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor and Knight of Malta King George V), which Empire had also been slated for ultimate destruction. Jerusalem would now be taken from the Moslems, or rather given away by the Order’s Masonic Sultan in 1917 (the Sultan’s “defenders” of Jerusalem surrendering the city to Masonic British General Allenby without firing a shot!), to be under the military power of Britain until Israel’s War of Independence (conveniently aided through a military “mistake” by Haj Amin al-Husseini, Masonic commander of Palestine’s Arab Moslems) in 1948. According to James A. Wylie’s The History of Protestantism, Volume II, Book 15, page 386, Loyola’s first quest was to take Jerusalem from the Moslems:

“The war in which Loyola and his nine companions enrolled themselves, when on the 15th of August, 1534, they made their vow in the Church of Montmartre, was to be waged against the Saracens of the East.” [Emphasis added] Clearly, Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus, fully

intended to reclaim Jerusalem for the pope as did every Crusade during the Dark Ages, save the First Crusade. In fact, the two cities preeminent in the mind of every Jesuit professed of the Fourth Vow are Jerusalem and Babylon. Rome is merely the base of operations until the Order can move its commercial capital from London to a rebuilt Babylon (Revelation 18), and its religious capital from Rome (Revelation 17) to Jerusalem (II Thessalonians 2:3-4) hosting a rebuilt Hebrew Temple in its midst (Daniel 9:27; Matthew 24:15). At the time of World War I, both cities were within the jurisdiction of Islam’s Ottoman Empire. Therefore, it had to be broken up if Solomon’s Hebrew Temple and Babylon were to be rebuilt. The 33rd Degree Freemason and Royal Institute of International Affairs member, which the Black Pope used to divide up the Ottoman Empire, was the arch conspirator in the deliberate sinking of the Lusitania (1915) and the murder of 100,000 White Protestant British soldiers at Gallipoli (1915), Winston Churchill.

4

After the infamous Treaty of Versailles concluded in 1919, the nations of Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Turkey, and Palestine (Israel) were created out of the former Ottoman Empire. The Jesuits, via their high Freemasons directing the Versailles conference in Paris, carefully laid the foundations for the future creation of these new nations. Britain would rule Iraq (Babylon), Jordan and Palestine/Israel (Jerusalem). France would rule Lebanon (Beirut) and Syria (Damascus). Thus, we see that the Black Pope used the British Empire (his creature since the tyrannical reign of King George III) to oversee the world’s two most important cities in the eyes of the Order: Jerusalem and Babylon. The building of Jerusalem would commence; but the building of Babylon would have to wait until after this present, American-led Crusade and war of Moslem/Shiite annihilation in Iraq and Iran. Then Babylon could be rebuilt with its precursor in Dubai. Apparently, the Masonic Sunni and Wahhabi leaders subject to Rome (including the Black Pope’s Masonic House of Saud) have united for the destruction of the Shiites (formerly, the greatest Moslem enemies of the Jesuits, their past leaders having expelled the Order from Iraq in 1969), while Shiite leaders of today aid in that murder, betraying their own people into the hands of American crusaders, including the pope’s Knight of Malta-owned, “turkey-shooting,” U.S.-based, Blackwater Group mercenaries. The French Mandate issued at Versailles, based upon the pre-arranged Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916), enabled France to begin occupying Lebanon and Syria. Lebanon became a republic in 1926 and achieved independence in 1943, during World War II. Its first president was a “heretic” Greek Orthodox lawyer and former journalist, Charles Dabbas. He in turn governed the republic that was filled with “accursed heretics,” including non- Roman Catholic Christians slated for “extirpation” pursuant to the Black Pope’s Counter Reformation Council of Trent. They included Maronites and Greek Orthodox; their future murderers would be Sunni and Shiite Moslems

5

acting as the “Sword of the Church.” For that murder to transpire, the French would have to go, as they had been the protectors of all “Christians” within the Ottoman Empire. Since 1943 Lebanon has been an independent republic secretly ruled by the Jesuit Order from their military fortress, St. Joseph’s University in Beirut. The Jesuit Provincial for the Order’s Near East Vice-Province resides in Beirut and is pictured below; the province is composed of Egypt, Lebanon and Syria. Thus, Beirut is the heart of all Jesuit military activity within the nation and region. http://www.companysj.com/v143/meetingpix.html

Fr. Jan Bronsveld, 2007

Jesuit Provincial for the Near East Vice-Province Local Master of Hezbollah and Government of Lebanon

Secret Master of Lebanon’s Intelligence Services

6

The most important Jesuit of all, the Provincial for the Near East Vice- Province for eighteen years, was none other than today’s Jesuit General:

Peter-Hans Kolvenbach, 1990s

Jesuit Superior General, 1983-Present Provincial, Near East Vice-Province, 1974-1981

Incited Lebanese Civil War in 1975 Ordered to Rome by Jesuit Superior General Pedro Arrupe, 1981

http://www.30giorni.it/us/articolo.asp?id=554

We now shall be able to understand the mass-murder of Lebanon’s resident, non-papal Christians at the hands of Rome’s Moslem “warriors for the Church.” This will ultimately bring us to the Black Pope’s creation and temporary backing of Shiite Hezbollah as well as the Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists (ruling the pope’s revived “Kingdom of Jerusalem”—Israel) and

7

thus the Mossad and military commanders of the Israeli Defense Forces. Between these two military powers were the “heretic and liberal,” non- Roman Catholic Christians who were being annihilated in the most recent Israeli-Hezbollah War (2006). Tortured and murdered by Shiite Hezbollah and bombed by the Israeli Defense Forces, the Christians of Southern Lebanon were just more victims of Jesuit military maneuvers, the Black Pope directing both sides of every conflict and thus the resultant diplomatic resolutions. (We see this scenario repeated in Israel over and over again.) The “extirpation” was merely the Council of Trent enforced once again amidst the confusion of Shiite Hezbollah’s rocket attacks into Israel killing another group of “accursed infidels,” the racial Jews within the borders of the land promised to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Genesis 15:16-21).

Body of Questions In light of the above background, the following questions will be addressed with additional supporting facts: Question 1: “The public impression has been that Iran finances Hezbollah, and that Saudi Arabia financed Saad Hariri and Fath al-Islam. Can you offer convincing, specific evidence that CIA/Saudi Arabia finances Hezbollah?” Response 1: There is no question that CIA/Al Qaeda/Saudi Arabia finances Shiite Hezbollah. The leaders of Hezbollah must follow orders or they will be terminated as was President Kennedy in 1963, as was Hezbollah’s Abbas al- Musawi in 1992, as was King Faisal of Saudi Arabia in 1975. (It is most intriguing that Faisal was murdered by a close relative who had just returned from the United States. No doubt, Georgetown University was involved as per the Hollywood American movie/video titled Syriana.)

8

The open but false policy of the CIA is to oppose Shiite Hezbollah (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/10/wleb10.xml) in support of Lebanon’s Sunni Moslem Prime Minister Fouad Siniora. (Siniora was trained by Jesuit Coadjutors in Beirut at the American University—once the Syrian Protestant College (1866-1920) but now manned by Knight of Malta-directed CIA assets—and was employed at Citibank in New York City, said bank being ruled by the Knights of Malta. (A past head of Citicorp, the holding company for Citibank, was U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and JFK assassin, Knight of Malta William Simon.) Yet the secret but true policy of the Jesuit/Nazi/SMOM-ruled CIA is to back Shiite Hezbollah through Saudi Arabia for the annihilation of all “Christians” (including “liberal” Roman Catholics) in Lebanon. It is most telling to observe that there are no more Jewish communities in Lebanon or Iraq, the poverty-stricken majority Jews having been forced to flee to the pope’s intended Jewish graveyard, Israel.

Lebanon is to be a complete and total, political Islamic state, as are Turkey, Egypt, and Syria. No Christian of any stripe is to ever be seated in government if Wahhabi Saudi-financed Shiite Hezbollah and Syria (ruled by Jesuits in Damascus) succeed in fulfilling its mission. Lebanon’s old, anti- Jesuit, French protectors are gone (the Order being re-admitted into France in 1942 after which, in 1943, Jesuit Coadjutors Henri Petain and Pierre Laval cut loose Lebanon for the future annihilation of Lebanon’s Christians by the Black Pope’s Masonically-led Moslem hordes as was the case in Orthodox Armenia). The Jesuits rule the region via their Provincial in Beirut. With his help, nearby Orthodox Southern Cyprus, now in the European Community, is to be taken back by Turkey as a consolation prize for not being allowed into the pope’s Roman Catholic European Union, thereby evacuating and/or destroying the Greek Orthodox people of Cyprus which destruction began in 1974 at the direction of the pope’s CFR/Knight of Malta “Court Jew,” Henry Kissinger (“Henry Killinger,” as the Cypriots call him). This means the

9

expulsion of the British military and British ex-patriots from Cyprus, and the Islamic-block nations are to be united under the all-seeing eye of the Black Pope’s Jesuit Assistant ruling that Moslem-populated Jesuit Assistancy. (Presently there are ten Jesuit Assistancies in the world.) This united Moslem block will then enter into an alliance with Russia for the purposed invasion of North America at the close of Rome’s Twenty-first Century Crusade. Presently, the Jesuits are “extirpating” the Christians in Lebanon in the same, exact manner as they are “extirpating” the Orthodox Christians in Serbia. Roman Catholic Croats and Moslem Albanians, backed by America’s Jesuit/CFR-directed military and CIA, murdered tens of thousands of Orthodox Serbs in the 1990s. At this moment the Order is using NATO to back the same two factions, the Croats and Albanians, continuing the killing of those most “accursed and obstinate Serbian heretics.” Jesuit Roman Fascism (its greatest military champion being the CFR-ruled U.S. government with two huge fasces on display in the House of Representatives) and Islam work together today to “extirpate all heretics from the face of the earth.” That combination was used to put down the Spanish Republic from 1936 to 1939 via Francisco Franco directed by Cardinal Segura; to murder the Serbs during World War II via Himmler’s SS-directed, Franciscan-led, Croatian Ustashi overseen by Archbishop Stepinac from 1941 to 1945; and to attack the anti-Roman Catholic, Coptic Christian nation of Ethiopia via Mussolini directed by Cardinal Secretary of State Eugenio Pacelli, killing 700,000 Black Ethiopians. That extirpation now extends to Lebanon. We now must focus on Wahhabi Saudi Arabia. The Jesuits instituted Wahhabi Islam in the mid-1700s via the British Empire. One of its key operatives within the British Secret Intelligence Service was 33rd Degree Freemason Sir Richard Burton who made a pilgrimage to Mecca and Medina in 1853. By 1932 the British working with Mussolini (whose advisor was the

10

Secretary to the Society of Jesus, Pietro Tacchi-Venturi) established the Order’s oil bonanza within the heart of Islam, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Mussolini, hailed as the “Protector of Islam” in 1937, gave arms and supplies to Saudi Arabia’s first King, Ibn Saud.

Il Duce Benito Mussolini, 1937

Roman Catholic Fascist “Protector of Islam” Advised by Jesuit Pietro Tacchi-Venturi

Saud’s personal advisor was British Intelligence agent and English

Knight of Malta Sir John Philby who was himself a Wahhabi Moslem. In 1933, the Saudis gave their oil concession to Standard Oil of California (SOCAL), controlled by the Knights of Malta through Rockefeller

11

ownership. Years later, one of those Knights active in SOCAL would be JFK assassin and CIA Director, John McCone.

The 1930s commenced the Order’s quest of hording the world’s gold and oil. The wealth of the once mighty, White Protestant nations of Western Civilization would be redirected into the coffers of Saudi Arabia after the Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945). Simultaneously, America’s oil wells would be capped, its Alaskan pipeline would be used for the oil needs of Japan and Americans would pay more at the pumps, further indebting the American Empire to Saudi Arabia, which hates the Lord’s Abrahamic covenant-bound, racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites. (Not a single synagogue or Bible-reading church is allowed in the pope’s Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.) The massive wealth directed into Saudi Arabia would then be used to build the commercial powerhouse of Wahhabi-Islamic, Jew-hating Dubai while secretly building an international Masonic Islamic Terrorist Network. That Network would be overseen by the Black Pope’s International Intelligence Community and its money would be laundered through the Order’s International Banking Community. The Black Pope’s International Drug Trade worked by the Sicilian Mafia (overseen by the Archbishop of Palermo) and orchestrated by the Jesuit General’s CIA-led, International, Intelligence Community (including Al Qaeda) and International Crime Syndicate would also be used to finance his Terrorist Network. All the while, those historic White Anglo-Saxon Protestant nations outside of continental Europe (England, Scotland, America, Canada, South Africa, Rhodesia, and Australia)—having abandoned the public honoring of the Reformation English Bible, The Authorized King James Version of 1611—would continue to descend into the status of mere third world nations with huge national debts, no middle class, no individual liberty and treasonous political leaders in the employ of the Vatican thereby returning the Modern Era back to the Dark Ages when the pope was the universal monarch of the world.

12

Saudi Arabia is the bank for Rome’s International Islamic Terrorist Network. (In the 1800s it was the Order’s International Anarchist Terrorist Network, which assassinated at least fifty heads of state, including Tzar Alexander II (1881) and President William McKinley (1901)). If the Jesuits have ruled Saudi Arabia since its inception in 1932; if the Jesuits have directed the CIA since its inception since 1947; and if the Order dictates policy to the Saudi monarchs as it has since King Ibn Saud; if the Company is building its Masonic Islamic International Terrorist Network for the purpose serving as a common enemy to unite Europe under Rome (via the European Community) while using this same CIA-directed Islamic Terrorist Network to financially and culturally destroy apostate Protestant Western Civilization; if the Black Pope’s “oil bonanza” of Saudi Arabia finances Al Qaeda; WHY WOULD THE BLACK POPE NOT SUPPORT SHIITE HEZBOLLAH???? As the covert master of Saudi Arabia, the Black Pope uses his Wahhabi Kingdom to finance his international, Islamic jihadist Crusaders—as secretly intended from the very day of the Kingdom’s creation. Hezbollah is one of the jihadist groups according to Rome’s CFR-controlled U.S. News and World Report. Published on Dec. 15, 2003, we read from “The Saudi Connection,” page 28:

“The high-flying Carlyle Group has made fortunes doing deals with the Saudis. Among Carlyle’s top advisers have been former [SMOM] President George H. W. Bush; James Baker, his secretary of state; and [SMOM] Frank Carlucci, a former secretary of defense. If that wasn’t enough, there was the staggering amount of Saudi investment in America—as much as $600 billion in U.S. banks and stock markets.” “That kind of clout may help explain why the House of Saud could be so dismissive of American concerns on terrorism. Official inquiries about bin Laden went unanswered by Riyadh. When Hezbollah terrorists killed 19 U.S. troops with a massive truck bomb at Khobar Towers in Dharhan [Saudi Arabia] in 1996, Saudi officials stonewalled, then shut the FBI out of the investigation.”

13

Thus, CIA/Saudi Arabia finances Hezbollah as it does Al Qaeda. Further, both jihadist factions are controlled by the Moslem Brotherhood which is directed by high, Islamic Freemasons from the Grand Lodges of Cairo and Istanbul. This is never spoken of in any alternative circles. Question 2: “What is the purpose behind the emergence of Fath a-Islam in Lebanon?” Response 2: Fatah al-Islam (“Conquest of Islam”) is a radical Sunni Islamist terrorist group with links to CIA/Al Qaeda. Formed in November of 2006 and led by Palestinian refugee Shaker al-Abssi, it gained notoriety by open combat with Lebanese forces at the Nahr al-Bared Palestinian refugee camp in May/June of 2007. The pope’s CFR-controlled U.S. government openly classified the group as a terrorist organization, while at this moment there are sixty-two (62) Islamic terrorist training camps on American soil under the covert direction of the CIA/FBI. (This fact was provided to the author by a former Arab Palestinian who was a member of the Moslem Brotherhood and a Palestinian street-fighter in Israel. He is now a Bible-believing Christian and his ministry is to Arab Moslems in America, leading them to the true Lord Jesus Christ of the Reformation Bible.) Al-Abssi was backed by the Syrian government as well as the Lebanese government for the ridiculous reason of “fighting Hezbollah.” Secretly, both Sunni Fatah al-Islam and Shiite Hezbollah work together for the complete Islamic conversion of Lebanon while making incursions into Israel for the killing of racial Jews—as intended by the Jesuit General. The same policy will be used here in the U.S. It is most intriguing to know that U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, a CFR member and 33rd Degree Freemason, and Saudi National Security Advisor Prince Bandar (“Bush”) bin Sultan have provided funding to Fatah al-Islam “to counter” Shiite Hezbollah. The truth is both factions work

14

together at the top via their leaders beholden to the Jesuit Provincial in Beirut as did the leaders of Nicaragua’s Contras and Sandinistas who served the Archbishop of New York City, John Cardinal O’Connor. The Jesuits have used their CFR-controlled U.S. government to openly finance a faction that is intended to lose after its purpose is accomplished. This was done with the anti-communist Hungarian patriots in 1956, the anti-communist Cuban patriots in 1961 at the Bay of Pigs, and the anti-communist Nicaraguan Contras in the 1980s. This may also be the case with Fatah al-Islam, built to be betrayed in the future—but this author doubts it. The group is backed by CIA/Al Qaeda, is financed by both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Thus it appears that Fatah al-Islam will be used to continue to draw to the forefront the real, uncontrollable enemies of Rome’s Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists ruling Israel for execution by the CIA/Mossad or IDF, while destabilizing the Lebanese government to the end that Lebanon will not protect its “Christians” of whatever stripe. Question 3: “What is the hierarchy in Beirut?” Response 3: The Jesuit Provincial in Beirut is the man of total power in the region. That man is Jan Bronsveld as previously given. He has the complete support of the Black Pope’s International Intelligence Community, including the CIA, the Mossad and both Lebanese and Syrian Intelligence. Question 4: “Who are the assassins among the Jesuits in Beirut?” Response 4: The assassins in the area can be drawn upon from many factions controlled by the Jesuits. Assassins could be used from any one of the Masonic Islamic terrorist groups, any one of the national intelligence agencies overseen by the Knights of Malta, a member of the Order’s Masonic/SMOM International Crime Syndicate, or “lone nuts” at the disposal of the

15

Company. In any event, no high-level assassination is carried out without a direct order from the Jesuit General advised by his Assistants in Rome. The murders are planned after extensive reports from the General’s Provincials in the region and under the advisement of his Assistants after pointed deliberation. The “Father General’s” Assistant for the region is fully apprised as to every significant event in the Near East Vice-Province by meticulous reports from Jesuit Provincial Bronsveld. Question 5: “What Lebanese politicians work for them (& in what capacity)?” Response 5: The most prominent Lebanese politicians working for the Jesuit Provincial in Beirut are none other than your own Prime Minister, Fouad Siniora (19 July 2005-Present) and President Emile Lahoud (24 November 1998-Present). Siniora is a Sunni Moslem, Lahoud is a Maronite Roman Catholic whose mother was an Armenian from Syria. (According to the Constitution, the President is to be a Maronite Catholic and the Prime Minister is to be a Sunni Moslem.)

Lahoud was commander-in-chief of the army and, thus in fact, a military dictator from 1989 to 1998. In 1998 he was elected president and is the only “Christian” head of state in an Arab country. Any opposition to him is eliminated, thanks to Jesuit intrigue via Rome’s intelligence agencies in the region. Former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri was assassinated by the chiefs of Lebanon’s security forces because he opposed an additional presidential term for Lahoud as backed by the Order’s Masonic President Bashar Assad of Syria, the Jesuits controlling Damascus via Syrian Intelligence. It was reported by the New YorkTimes that Lahoud went swimming on the day of Hariri’s murder. Lahoud is clearly a pawn for Jesuit Provincial Jan Bronsveld and must be removed if Lebanon is to ever be normalized.

16

Siniora is also Jesuit-controlled, he being tied to international finance via the Knights of Malta at Citibank/Citicorp for which reason he has the backing of Skull and Bonesman President George W. Bush (whose father and uncle are both Knights of Malta), the pope’s United Nations and the surrounding Arab countries. He has included the criminal Hezbollah in his government (as per the desires of the Jesuit Provincial) but refuses to have any dealings with General Michael Aoun’s “Free Patriotic Movement.” Aoun is a true Lebanese patriot and is in great danger of being assassinated by an agent of Rome as was ex-Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. General Aoun’s late enemy was the Jesuit-trained President, Elias Hrawi. (As mentioned, Hariri was murdered by Jesuit Coadjutors within Lebanon’s intelligence services, which killing was then blamed on Syria with the secret collusion of the Syrian President. Both Siniora and Lahoud were parties to the assassination and will never be prosecuted for the crime. Meanwhile, the Lebanese people are kept agitated against Syria when their greatest enemies are in Beirut. This same tactic is being used on the American people, they believing that the Moslem world is their enemy when the greatest threat to their personal security and happiness is in Washington, D.C., i.e., Jesuit Georgetown University ruling the CFR/Bush Crime Family in the White House.) Question 6: “Can you outline what is actually taking place in Lebanon and what is the objective for the country.” Response 6: There are several objectives regarding Lebanon. First, it must be a staging base for continued attacks into Israel. Jesuit Coadjutor Shimon Peres is a co-conspirator against the Lord’s beloved Hebrew/Jewish people in Israel, along with Omert, Assad, Lahoud, Siniora, the Saud Dynasty, Abbas (who wrote his doctoral dissertation on the collusion between the Labor Zionists and the Nazis in carrying out the Eurasian Jewish Holocaust—which thesis is true!), not to mention Bush, Blair and Putin and their infamous

17

“Roadmap Policy” designed to purposely bring war into Israel for the destruction of the Moslem Mosques on the pope’s Temple Mount and the killing of thousands of “accursed” Moslems and Jews in Israel. (The author is convinced this is one of the paramount purposes for the pope’s American- led Crusade against Islam, called a “Crusade” by Bush himself!) For it was the infamous Jesuit Francis Xavier who cried: “Put me in a place where there are no Jews or Moslems.” {1}

The Second objective to be achieved in Lebanon is the elimination of any true, Bible-based, Christian influence in the land. This will be effected by the Jesuits using their “Sword of the Church,” fanatical Islam. Islam is nothing more than Roman Catholicism for the Arab peoples of color, the half-brothers of racial Jews who also have Biblical promises to inherit. The parallels are striking and once analyzed it becomes evident that the Papacy created Islam to annihilate “heretic” non-papal Christians, “liberal” Roman Catholics and “perfidious” racial Jews. This continues to be Rome’s design and use of Islam (especially with the Black Pope’s CIA-led Masonic Islamic International Terrorist Network), while simultaneously killing millions of Moslems in clearing the way for the building of the third Hebrew Temple for the last and final pope turned “Antichrist” to be worshipped therein sometime after this Crusade is terminated.

Therefore, we will continue to see the betrayal of Lebanese Christians by the government of Lebanon (as we presently observe with the Serbian Orthodox Christians) culminating in their murder by the fanatical forces of a Jesuit-ruled, Nazi/CIA/Al Qaeda/Wahhabi Islam which is the secret master of both Sunni and Shiite Moslem leadership. Once enough Shiites have been __________________________________________________________________ 1. Dr. E. Boyd Barrett, Ex-Irish Jesuit, Rome Stoops to Conquer, (New York: Julian Messner, Inc., 1935) p. 180.

18

murdered, Islam will be united under a common banner after the mosques in Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem are brought down by the secret forces of the Jesuit General. (This scenario is portrayed in the movie/video The Order featuring Roman Catholic Jean-Claude van Damme.) Rome will blame her American Empire she fully intends to destroy, just as she destroyed the Third Reich after she had used Hitler to mass-murder the “accursed,” anti- Communist, Russian Orthodox peoples, the “heretic” German Lutheran people, the “heretic and liberal” Protestant peoples of Britain and Europe (especially Czechoslovakia) and the “perfidious” Jews of Eurasia. Question 7: “Who is financing Lebanon?” Response 7: The sponsors of Lebanon are the pope’s international bankers financially controlling America, Britain, Europe and Saudi Arabia. Those bankers include the Chairman of the pope’s Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Ben Bernanke, one of the pope’s “Court Jews.” The Fed extends credit to the U.S. Congress which then gives U.S. foreign aid to Lebanon. This makes Lebanon the servant of the Black Pope’s American Empire. Question 8: “At the end of this email, there is a list of some assassinated Lebanese political figures. Can you offer specific details on who killed any or all of them and why each was killed?” Response 8: I do not have any specific details, but once the reader becomes acquainted with the apparatus of power controlled by the Society of Jesus and its aims, it is relatively easy to deduct why each and every one of the victims listed was assassinated. I shall attempt to add details and the reasons why two leaders were assassinated in addition to former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. This will help the reader establish a formula for finding the answer as to “Who benefits” and “Why.”

19

Bachir Gemayel: former President-Elect, founder of Lebanese Forces, son of Pierre Gemayel, assassinated on September 14, 1982. The author’s “gut feeling” is that he was assassinated for truly opposing the rising power of fanatical Islam in the country, including the PLO. This is true. Gemayel was a Roman Catholic Maronite “Christian” trained by the Jesuits at their St. Joseph University in Beirut. He led a right-wing fascist group of patriots, called the Kataeb Party, which the Jesuit Order, over time, betrayed into the hands of its Moslems. This includes the murder of Elie Hobeika who participated with the Israelis in the massacre of Palestinians in Nahr al-Bared refugee camp in Lebanon (mentioned above on page 13) after the murder of Gemayel in 1982. The same betrayal was done with the leaders of the right- wing Contras in Nicaragua, the right-wing Cubans at the Bay of Pigs, and the right-wing Chinese led by Chiang Kai-shek in 1949. Right-wing Jesuit fascism always loses in the end to its enemies after those fascists kill the peoples targeted by the Order. In this case it was unarmed Palestinian men, women and children in a refugee camp surrounded by the pope’s Israeli Defense Forces. The lesson we learn from Jesuit-trained Bachir Gamayel is that the Jesuit Brotherhood will set up one of their own students who, after graduation, was then placed in a key position of power, only to sacrifice him in the end after his usefulness has been fulfilled. His execution may be the result of disobedience as in the case of Benito Mussolini (who refused to deport the Jews of Rome to Auschwitz due to the influence of his Jewish mistress) and Yitzak Rabin (who refused to consent to making Jerusalem an international city to be shared with Arab Moslems, i.e., “Palestinians”) or merely to placate another enemy faction also under Jesuit domination. Renè Moawad: President for seventeen (17) days (1989). Also trained by Jesuits at St. Joseph University in Beirut, he brought hope seeking to end the civil war that raged from 1975 to 1990. Seemingly a virtuous leader and loved by his people, he said:

20

“There can be no country or dignity without unity of the people, and there can be no unity without agreement, and there can be no agreement without conciliation, and there can be no conciliation without forgiveness and compromise."

This, the Jesuit Order would never allow. Hatred must be festered on

the side of the Moslems against all “Christians” if Lebanon is to be conquered by Jesuit-directed Islam. He truly could have brought a real peace to Lebanon. Therefore, he was assassinated with a car-bomb killing an additional twenty-three (23) people. His murder was never investigated. The common enemy of Syria was blamed, but it was the Order’s Lebanese Intelligence Services who were at the bottom of the execution. Again, the Order sacrificed one of their own students “for the greater glory of God,” the god who sits in St. Peter’s Chair! As in the case of every political assassination, the intelligence community of that nation carries out the termination order issued by the Black Pope. In this way no truly representative, liberal government ruling for the benefit of the people can ever rise to popular power. So it is in Lebanon today; so it is in the United States of America. This is the conclusion of the author’s analysis and responses to the questions posed by Elias Aoun. The author thanks Mr. Aoun for the opportunity of providing this service and looks forward to many other opportunities of being of aid in resolving the international disorder caused by the Order, the Society of Jesus.

AffidavitPower of the Society of Jesus in Russia From Czar Alexander I to the Present

I, Eric Jon Phelps, Author of Vatican Assassins: “Wounded In The House Of

My Friends”, Third Edition, concerning the history of the ubiquitous,

Counter Reformation Society of Jesus in Russia, do solemnly state:

1. That in 1723 AD Czar Peter the Great expelled the Society of Jesus from Orthodox Russia for attempting to usurp the Romanov throne and reduce its citizens to the absolute Temporal Power of the Pope of Rome;

2. That by the mid-Eighteenth Century the power of the Society of Jesus had grown so great, that nearly every monarch in Europe was under the power of a Jesuit confessor or adviser directing affairs of state;

3. That due to this vast Jesuit power employed by the Jesuit Superior General to create commercial monopolies as well as assassinate selected enemies of the Society, be they popes or kings, the Order was expelled from Roman Catholic Portugal in 1759, from Roman Catholic France in 1764, from Roman Catholic Spain in 1767, and from Roman Catholic Malta in 1768;

4. That due to the most powerful European Roman Catholic monarchs, including the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta, expelling the Company of Jesus from their nations and empires, Franciscan Pope Clement XIV, after a four-year investigation, promulgated the lengthy Bull, Dominus ac Redemptor Noster, forever suppressing and extinguishing the Society of Jesus in 1773;

5. That because of the papacy’s suppression of the Society of Jesus, Pope Clement XIV was poisoned with a measured dose of “aquetta,” subjecting the “Vicar of Christ” to excruciating pain and prolonged suffering before he died in 1774;

6. That because of the Order’s suppression throughout the Holy Roman Empire as well as the entire Roman Catholic world, the Society sought and received protection from non-Roman Catholic monarchs. Three of those monarchs (all of whom were racial Germans) were Frederick II “the Great” of Prussia, Protector of the German Lutheran Church; Catherine II “the Great” of Russia, Protector of the Russian Orthodox Church; and King George III, Protector of the English Anglican Church and Protestant Faith of Great Britain;

7. That as a result of the Order’s protection from both Frederick and Catherine, Roman Catholic Poland was partitioned by those monarchs, eliminating the rule of Poland’s Roman Catholic monarch, thereby rendering the pope’s Bull of none effect in that nation, saving the Order’s massive property holdings and treasure from confiscation;

8. That as a result of the Order’s admittance into Russia, the Company established its headquarters therein, and began to plot the neutralization of all anti-papal priests and nuns within the Russian Orthodox Church;

9. That as a result of the Order’s admittance into Russia, the Company sought to usurp and control the power of the Romanov monarchy, proposing to submit both Czar and Orthodox Patriarch to the Temporal Power of a future pope of Rome within the control of the Order;

10. That as a result of the Order’s admittance into Russia, Empress Catherine created the “Pale of Settlement” for Russian Jews, forcing them into a specific geographical region, later to be exterminated by Masonic Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin whose Gestapo and NKVD worked together during World War II;

11. That as a result of the Order’s suppression by Pope Clement XIV, the Company founded a host of other secret societies including the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776;

12. That having founded the Bavarian Illuminati from Ingolstadt College near Munich, Bavaria, the Company used its new occult secret society to consolidate all Masonic power into its hands, thereby creating Illuminized Freemasonry, directed at its apex by the Jesuit General;

2 of 9

13. That having established its invisible power in Russia, Prussia, Poland and England, the Company then launched the Masonic French Revolution and subsequent Napoleonic Wars, taking vengeance on all enemies daring to curtail the power of the Order;

14. That during the Napoleonic Wars, Masonic Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Napoleon Bonaparte I drove the Knights of Malta from Malta, the Order finding refuge in Russia via the power of Czar Paul I, later murdered by the Company for refusing to wage war on Lutheran Germany;

15. That during the time of the Napoleonic Wars, the acting Jesuit General in Russia reduced the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta to his service in anticipation of the Order’s formal restoration by the pope, which restoration would come in 1814;

16. That as a result of Napoleon’s Jesuit War on the Vatican, on the Roman Catholic monarchs of Europe, and on the Protestant nations of Europe, including Germany and the Calvinist Republic of the United Netherlands, Pope Pius VII restored the Society of Jesus to its former power in August of 1814, one month prior to the commencement of the Congress of Vienna that restored the Papal States to the rule of the Pope;

17. That as a result of the Congress of Vienna (1814-1815), the Company of Jesus set out to destroy all constitutional republics, especially the Constitutional Republic of these United States of America, considered to be the font of all anti-divine right and anti-papal movements in Europe;

18. That as a result of the Congress of Vienna and the Order’s quest to control the Romanov monarchy in Russia, Czar Alexander I issued his famous “ukase” in 1820 expelling the Society of Jesus from all the Russias. Knowing the Order would then seek to secretly overthrow his imperial power via Grand Orient Freemasonry, in 1822 Bible-friendly Alexander closed every Masonic lodge in the empire;

19. That as a result of the expulsion of the Society of Jesus from Russia and the closing of all Masonic lodges within the empire, Czar Alexander I was given “the poison cup” in 1825 in accordance with the bloody Fourth Vow taken by the highest of the Professed Jesuits within the Order;

3 of 9

20. That as a result of the Congress of Vienna, the Secret Treaty of Verona was convened by Prussia, Austria and Russia (1822), plotting the overthrow of the Protestant-Calvinist, constitutionally limited, anti-absolute monarchy, government of these United States of America;

21. That as a result of the Secret Treaty of Verona, James Monroe issued his beloved Monroe Doctrine (1823), warning all European Powers to stay out of the Western Hemisphere to the chagrin of the Jesuit Order;

22. That as a result of the Order’s past expulsion from Orthodox Russia by Czars Peter the Great and Alexander I, the Jesuits contrived another means by which it would be able to reduce the Russian Orthodox monarchy and peoples, to the Temporal Power of the Pope now governed by the Jesuit General: that means would be Marxian Socialist-Communism. For the Company had perfected the socialist tenets of Sir Thomas More’s Utopia while the Order had operated its 59 socialist-communist “Reductions” in Paraguay (1609-1759). These tenets were codified into The Communist Manifesto, its penholder being Masonic Jew Karl Marx, its authors being the Jesuits resident in England;

23. That as a result of the practical effects of Napoleon’s war on papal political tyranny coupled with the preaching of the Reformation Bible throughout Europe and America during the 19th Century, the Jesuit Order was suppressed once again throughout Europe, so much so, the Company has called it “the Century of Disaster;”

24. That during the “Century of Disaster,” the Jesuit Order remained formally expelled from Russia since 1820. Beginning with the reign of the great Alexander II, Russia was beginning to experience political liberty at the hand if her greatest of Czars. But on the day he was to sign a written Constitution limiting the power of the monarchy and abolishing the secret police (the Okhrana), he was assassinated by the Anarchists, hired assassins of the Jesuits, later to murder President McKinley;

25. That as a result of Alexander II’s brutal murder, the assassination having succeeded on the fifth attempt, the only Jew involved in the murder was blamed by successor Alexander III who then launched a bloody pogrom killing tens of thousands of Jews throughout Russia;

4 of 9

26. That as a result of Alexander III’s pogroms, the Order instilled a hatred for the Romanov dynasty in the hearts of Russian Jews. This was necessary as the Order was to use its obedient Masonic Jews to lead the Bolshevik Revolution giving the appearance to the world that Bolshevik Communism was in fact “Jewish Bolshevik Communism;”

27. That as a result of Alexander III’s pogroms, his son and successor, Czar Nicholas II, would launch the bloodiest pogroms in Russian history, further driving the Jews of Russia into the Order’s Bolshevik Communist revolutionary camp;

28. That in preparation for the Order’s overthrow of Orthodox Russia pursuant to the Council of Trent, Moscow being “the Third Rome,” the Jesuits trained their prize student for the task, Josef Stalin. Educated by Roman Catholic Capuchin priests in Gori, Georgia, Stalin was given a scholarship by those priests to attend the Orthodox Tiflis Seminary in Tiflis, Georgia. There, under the tutorship of secret Jesuit, Orthodox Father Demetrius, Stalin was taught the doctrines of Marxian Communism in preparation for the Bolshevik Revolution (1917);

29. That as a result of the Order’s control of Czars Alexander III and Nicolas II, while exciting anti-Czarist fury among the Jews of Russia, the Bolshevik Revolution was a success. From 1920 to 1922 the Order conducted a Bolshevik Civil War throughout Russia, killing off all nationalist resistance led by Orthodox patriots. The Jesuit-led Bolsheviks totally decapitated all leaders within the Russian Orthodox Church who were against the Papacy, over 5,000 priests and nuns losing their lives;

30. That as a result of the successful Red Bolshevik Civil War against the White Russian Orthodox, Masonic President Warren G. Harding gave over 60 million dollars to the Reds in 1922---the same year Stalin readmitted the Jesuits into Russia---further entrenching their rule;

31. That as a result of the successful Red Bolshevik Revolution, Edmund A. Walsh, an American Jesuit priest from Georgetown University, was dispatched to Moscow to negotiate for the Vatican with the Bolsheviks.From 1922 to 1924 Walsh resided in the new, Jesuit slave state of the “USSR” naming Josef Stalin Secretary of the Communist Party;

5 of 9

32. That as a result of the elimination of the Romanov Dynasty and the subordination of the Russian Orthodox clergy, Edmund Walsh, in his Total Empire: The Roots and Progress of World Communism(Milwaukee: The Bruce Publishing Company, 1951), page 28, wrote about the Russian Revolution of 1917, that it was,

“. . . the most significant single political event in the history of Western civilization since the decline and disappearance of the Roman Empire.”;

33. That the reason Jesuit Edmund Walsh put such tremendous weight upon the success of the Bolshevik Revolution lay in the fact the Order had used its Marxist Socialist-Communism to submit its old enemy, Orthodox Moscow, “the Third Rome,” to the Roman Papal Caesar. Constantinople, “the Second Rome,” had fallen to Rome’s apparent enemy of Islam in 1453 AD, thereby conveniently benefitting the papacy; Moscow, had fallen to Rome’s apparent enemy of Communism in 1917 AD, also conveniently benefitting the papacy, the world in fact to be deprived ofthe truth that both Islam and Communism are creations of the Vatican;

34. That the Jesuits were now in total control of the Bolshevik Communists ruling the USSR with deadly cruelty, the Julian calendar was replaced with the Gregorian calendar (1917) composed by the Jesuit Christopher Clavius; that every Jewish leader during the Revolution was slowly and systematically executed or murdered save one, Lazar M. Kaganovitch; that Jesuit Coadjutor Josef Stalin launched a murderous inquisition against the Orthodox peoples of the Ukraine, starving from 7 to 10 million people in one year; that the inquisition extended to Protestant Mennonites, Lutherans and Baptists throughout the USSR in accordance with the Black Pope’s Counter Reformation Council of Trent;

35. That the Jesuits were now in control of the USSR, Jesuit Edmund A. Walsh sat in the White House next to his servant, Masonic American President Franklin D. Roosevelt, when the president formally recognized the USSR as a sovereign nation in 1933;

36. That as a result of FDR recognizing the USSR, massive projects were begun by American cartel-capitalists, including Masonic Henry Ford furnishing the Gorky auto plant mechanizing the Soviet War Machine;

6 of 9

37. That because the Jesuit Order plotted to use the White Protestant, Baptist and Roman Catholic Middle Class of its American Empire to build Rome’s Red Communist monster in Moscow, the USSR was made a partner of the Allies during World War II, FDR giving 11.3 billion dollars in Lend Lease funds and materials to Stalin, never to be repaid to the American people;

38. That as a result of the Jesuit Order being in total control of its CFR-directed American government since no later than 1865 with Rome’s assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, FDR gave all of Eastern Europe into the hands of the USSR at the Yalta Conference at the command of Jesuits Harry Hopkins and Averell Harriman, in preparation for the ensuing Cold War Hoax during which the Society of Jesus would use its CIA and KGB to destroy all genuine, Eastern European /Russian Bible-believers as well as all true nationalists, furthering the Order’s quest for world government under a Jesuit-directed Pope of Rome;

39. That during the Pope’s Cold War Hoax (premised upon the hoax of mutual airborne nuclear war as explained in VAIII) the Order’s CFR-controlled American government provided the financing and technology for the building of the Black Pope’s Soviet War Machine, erecting the Kama River truck factory during the 1970s facilitated by Jesuit Fordham University-trained Knight of Malta William J. Casey before becoming the Director of Rome’s pro-Nazi, Central Intelligence Agency;

40. That upon the conclusion of the Jesuit General’s Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945), the American OSS/CIA continued to work together with the Soviet NKVD/KGB throughout the entirety of the Cold War Hoax; that this secret alliance is referred to in the Jesuit Order’s Hollywood Theater release, The Good Shepherd (2006);

41. That during this time of secret, mutual collaboration between the American, Soviet and British intelligence agencies, stupendous acts of treason were committed against the American people, including CIA Counterintelligence Chief James Angleton giving many of the Agency’s top secrets over to Anatoli Golitsin, a Soviet KGB officer in the US. Anthony Cave Brown makes this clear in his Treason in the Blood (New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1994), page 555:

7 of 9

“Angleton . . . demonstrated his confidence in Golitsin [a supposed defector] by making available to him the CIA files on the personnel of the main operating section of the CIA in the Cold War with Russia, the thousand-odd men and women of the Soviet Division.”;

42. That during the Cold War Hoax, both the American and Soviet intelligence agencies were manned with ex-Nazis, the papacy saving its Nazi Gestapo/SS/SD inquisitional mass-murderers from justice under the guise of fighting either “Communism” in the East or “Capitalism” in the West as proven by author John Loftus in his Unholy Trinity: How the Vatican’s Nazi Networks Betrayed Western Intelligence to the Soviets(New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991);

43. That during the Cold War Hoax, former Nazi intelligence chief Reinhard Gehlen ran the West German BND in conjunction with the East German SSD, Stasi. For ex-SS Nazi Hans Felfe, Gehlen’s right-hand man in the BND, also worked for the East German SSD/Stasi for over twenty years; thus, BND Chief Reinhard Gehlen and SSD Chief Marcus Wolf worked together for over twenty years perfecting the East-West united intelligence community subject to the Jesuit Papacy, partitioned Berlin serving as a foremost rendezvous for East-West agencies:

44. That during the Cold War Hoax, Moscow served as a training base for the Jesuit Order’s world revolutionary socialist communists, including Fidel Castro, Michael (“Martin Luther”) King, Yasser Arafat, Jesuit-trained Bill Clinton and indeed, president-elect Barry Davis Obama;

45. That during the Pope’s Cold War Hoax the Jesuit Papacy in control of both East and West, was perfecting its internationalist/anti-nationalistsocialist-communist revolution; its Unified International Intelligence Community; its International Banking Cartel; its International Mafia Organized Crime Syndicate; its International Drug Trade; its plot to assemble a military coalition of nations to one day attack and subjugate the “heretic and liberal” American peoples, said coalition having been built and financed by the Pope’s CFR-controlled American government; that the culmination of this plot will be a Sino-Soviet-Muslim invasion into North America ending what is left of the Grand and Glorious White Northern European Protestant Reformation;

8 of 9

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

For the COUNTY OF KINGS Index No.: 21948-2012 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------x Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, Petitioner, -against- HAKEEM JEFFRIES ET AL.,, Respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------------------x

• ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR A FOR TRO, PRELIMINARY, INJUNCTION, PROTECTION, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND PROHIBITION ORDER

• Memorandum in support of Order to Show Cause

• Affidavit in support of Order to Show Cause

Ex 1 – November 9, 2012 duly notified the respondents of COMPLAINT and NOTICE Ex 2 - November 16, 2016 response to NOTICE Joshua Pepper NYS Assistant Attorney General Ex 3 – December 4, 2008 Order and Decision Article 78 Petition Index No.: 2008-29641 Ex 4 – Index No.: 2008-29641 November 3, 2008 proceeding Transcript Ex 5 - October 15, 2012 duly filed a Notice of Release without Consideration Ex 6 – November 14, 2012 Notice of Petition and Verified Petition Ex 7 - November 16, 2012 Affidavit of service of Notice of Petition, Verified Petition and Notice Ex 8 – Donald Trump’s latest November 1, 2012 Press release Ex 9 – Sheriff Arpaio of Maricopa County Arizona with June 12, 2012 Affidavit Ex 10 – Graphics Expert Paul E. Irey work published by the Washington Times on November 19, 2012 Ex 11 – Intelligence Expert testimony by Pamela Barnett that Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background Check Ex 12 – November 8, 2012 Affidavit of Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III United States Navy Retired Ex 13 – 2005 Private Report to Elias Aoun on those responsible for the assassination of Rafic Baha El Deen Al-Hariri, and June 29, 2010 Affidavit of Eric Jon Phelps entitled Power of the Society of Jesus in Russia From Czar Alexander I to the Present; Dated: Brooklyn, New York November ___, 2012 ____________________________________ Christopher Earl Strunk in esse, petitioner

593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281, Brooklyn, New York 11238. (845) 901-6767 E-mail: [email protected]

6

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit H

Print | Close Window

Subject: Case Name: STRUNK, CHRISTOPHER-EARL vs. BOARD OF ELECTIONS Index Number: 021948/2012From: "Bill Van Allen" <[email protected]>Date: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 5:46 pm

To: <[email protected]>

Cc: "\"PAMELA BARNETT" <[email protected]>, "Dr. Orly Taitz Esq" <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>

Copyright © 2003-2012. All rights reserved.

WebCivil Supreme - Case DetailCourt: Kings Civil Supreme

Index Number: 021948/2012

Case Name: STRUNK, CHRISTOPHER-EARL vs. BOARD OF ELECTIONS

Case Type: Special Proceedings

Track: Standard

RJI Filed: 11/16/2012

Date NOI Due:

NOI Filed:

Disposition Date:

Calendar Number:

Jury Status:

Justice Name: DAVID SCHMIDT (PT. 47)

Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:

CHRISTOPER-EARL STRUNK - Prose Attorney Type: Pro se Atty. Status: Active

Attorney/Firm For Defendant:

HAKEEM JEFFRIES - Prose Attorney Type: Pro se Atty. Status: Active

Workspace Webmail :: Print https://email06.secureserver.net/view_print_multi.php?uidArray=20444|...

1 of 1 12/11/2012 4:44 PM

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit I

State of Arizona

County of Maricopa

) ) ss. 1

AFFIDAVIT

I, the undersigned, being first duly sworn, do hereby state under oath and under penalty of perjury that the facts are true:

1. I am over the age of 18 and am a resident of Arizona. The information contained in this affidavit is based upon my own personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, could testify competently thereto. I am the duly elected Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, and I have been a law enforcement officer and official, in both state and federal government, for 5 1 years.

2. In August of last year, a group of citizens from the Surprise Arizona Tea Party organization met with me in my office and presented a petition signed by approximately 250 residents of Maricopa County, asking if I would investigate the controversy surrounding President Barrack Obama's birth certificate authenticity and his eligibility to serve as the President of the United States.

3. This group expressed its concern that, up until that point, no law enforcement agency in the country had ever gone on record indicating that they had either looked into this or that they were willing to do so, citing lack of resources and jurisdictional challenges.

4. The Maricopa County Sheriffs Office is in a rather unique position. Under the Arizona Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes, as the elected Sheriff of Maricopa County, I have the authority to request the aid of the volunteer posse, located in the county, to assist me in the execution of my duties. Having organized a volunteer posse of approximately 3,000 members, I, as the Sheriff of the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, can authorize an investigation go forward to answer these questions at virtually no expense to the tax payer.

5. The Cold Case posse agreed to undertake the investigation requested by the 250 citizens of Maricopa County. This posse consists of former police officers and attorneys who have worked investigating the controversy surrounding Barack Obama. The investigation mainly focused on the electronic document that was

presented as President Obama's long form birth certificate to the American people and to citizens of Maricopa County by the White House on April 27,201 1.

6. The investigation led to a closer examination of the procedures regarding the registration of births at the Hawaii Department of Health and various statements made by Hawaii government officials regarding the Obama birth controversy over the last five years.

7. Upon close examination of the evidence, it is my belief that forgery and fraud was likely committed in key identity documents including President Obama's long- form birth certificate, his Selective Service Registration card, and his Social Security number.

8. My investigators and I believe that President Obama's long-form birth certificate is a computer-generated document, was manufactured electronically, and that it did not originate in a paper format, as claimed by the White House. Most importantly, the "registrar's stamp" in the computer generated document released by the White House and posted on the White House website, may have been imported from another unknown source document. The effect of the stamp not being placed on the document pursuant to state and federal laws means that there is probable cause that the document is a forgery, and therefore, it cannot be used as a verification, legal or otherwise, of the date, place or circumstances of Barack Obama's birth.

9. The Cold Case Posse law enforcement investigation into Barack Obarna's birth certificate and his eligibility to be president is on-going. The on-going nature of the investigation is due to additional information that has come to light since we held the press conference in March, 2012. As soon as that information has been properly verified by the Cold Case Posse, I will release that information to the public.

Executed this Ld_ day of June, 20 1 Maricopa County, Arizona.

Joseph M. Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff

Sworn to and subsc ibed before me this \%?dayof $-lx\e ,2012.

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit J

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit K

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit L

by JEROME R. CORSI Email | ArchiveJerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books,N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Corsi's latest book is "WBirth Certificate?"

This is WND printer-friendly version of the article which follows.To view this item online, visit http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/banking-giant-accused-of-laundering-billions/

WND EXCLUSIVE

Ex-employee in New York has 1,000 pages of customer account recordsPublished: 02/01/2012 at 8:39 PM

NEW YORK – A former employee of HSBC in New York has 1,000 pages of customer account records heclaims are evidence of an international money-laundering scheme involving hundreds of billions of dollars bythe global banking giant, which reportedly is under investigation by a U.S. Senate committee.

John Cruz has delivered to WND customer account records he says he pulled from the HSBC computer systembefore he was fired. Cruz was terminated Feb. 17, 2010, after two years at HSBC for “poor performance,” but hecontends he was let go because senior management didn’t want to him to pursue his personal investigation.

Asked for comment, HSBC spokesman Rob Sherman issued a statement to WND.

“We support efforts to protect the integrity of the financial system, and our commitment to AML (anti-moneylaundering) includes rigorous internal processes and a close working partnership with regulators and lawenforcement,” the statement said.

One of the largest banks in the world, London-based HSBC has about 7,500 offices in more than 80 countriesand territories in Europe, North and South America, the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle East and Africa.

In his position as an account relationship manager, Cruz worked in the HSBC southern New York region, whichaccounts for about 50 percent of HSBC’s North American revenue. He was assigned to work with severalbranch managers to identify accounts in which HSBC might introduce additional banking services.

Cruz told WND he has “firsthand knowledge and proof of how HSBC transferred billions of dollars throughaccounts linked to companies that did not exist.”

“I had poor job performance because the portfolio of HSBC accounts I was given to work ended up being 90percent fictitious and fraudulent accounts,” he said. “How could I expand HSBC bank relations with fraudulentaccounts that were created to be used for illegal money laundering?”

Meanwhile, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has begun probing money-launderingactivity at HSBC, according to a Reuters report last week, with the intention of scheduling hearings in the spring.

Elise Bean, chief legal counsel and majority staff director for the Senate subcommittee, told WND the panel has“no comment” on any possible HSBC investigation.

WND » Banking giant accused of laundering billions » Print http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/banking-giant-accused-of-laundering-billio...

1 of 3 12/22/2012 6:44 PM

Cruz came to WND with the 1,000 pages of evidence before the committee’s investigation of HSBC wasreported.

He previously brought his complaint to Jeremy Scileppi, bureau chief of the Suffolk County District Attorney’soffice on Long Island.

“Scileppi was no more interested in hearing what I had to say than was the HSBC senior bank management,”Cruz said. “I got stonewalled. That’s when I decided to write a book.”

Titled “World Banking World Fraud: Using Your Identity,” the book was published Oct. 7, 2011.

Scileppi and the Suffolk County District Attorney’s office did not respond to a WND request to confirm Cruz’sclaim.

Cruz said that in the two years he worked for HSBC, he eventually discovered that money laundering was beingcarried out not only by branch managers but also by senior officers of the bank, both within the U.S. andinternationally.

“From what I saw, I came to suspect HSBC had become the Mexican drug cartels’ bank of choice,” he said.

The customer account records suggest identity theft was used to capture legitimate Social Security numbers andcreate bogus retail and commercial bank accounts through which HSBC employees could deposit and withdrawhundreds of millions of dollars on a daily basis, apparently without the knowledge of the identity-theft victims.

Cruz said he ultimately was fired after his supervisors made numerous attempts to discourage him frompursuing his personal investigation.

“When I began bringing to the attention of my supervisors suspicious activity in accounts that needed to bereported to legal authorities, including the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, I was told to shut up,” hesaid.

His job required him to access the HSBC computer system to find accounts to contact and visit in person.

“I was shocked to find accounts through which millions of dollars were being deposited and withdrawn withoutany apparent business activity being conducted,” he said. “Then when I went to visit the business, I foundnothing – shell companies, vacant offices with no furniture, or no such business whatsoever at the address listedon the account records.”

Cruz said he never imagined that keeping his job at HSBC would mean turning a blind eye to criminal behavior.

“I always thought that if you ran a bank, you would keep away from customers with fake names,” he said.“Instead, what I found at HSBC were thousands of accounts established for phantom businesses that hadapparently only thousands of dollars of claimed business each year, but millions of dollars flowing into and outof the accounts every month.”

One of Cruz’s first calls on an HSBC customer required a drive east on the Long Island Expressway to visit asmall insurance company. But the phone number turned out to be disconnected, and the tax ID numbercorresponded with another HSBC customer from Yonkers who had recently closed his account with the bank.

Another business Cruz visited, near the Brentwood Station on the Long Island Rail Way off Suffolk Avenue,turned out to be an abandoned building that evidently had not been occupied in some time. It had brokenwindows, and weeds pushed up through the cracked cement in the parking lot.


2 of 3 12/22/2012 6:44 PM

WND has contacted HSBC customers identified in the account records. They appeared to fall into severaldistinct categories, including former customers of the bank who claim to have closed their accounts and peoplewith no HSBC account history who were independently victims of identity theft related to credit card use.

In all cases WND investigated, the Social Security numbers used to open the HSBC accounts were legitimate andconnected to the person in whose name the retail or commercial bank account was opened.

In most cases, WND found the phone numbers listed with the HSBC accounts to be disconnected or assigned tonew users who claimed no knowledge of the accounts.


3 of 3 12/22/2012 6:44 PM

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit M

» Print

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to colleagues, clients orcustomers, use the Reprints tool at the top of any article or visit: www.reutersreprints.com.

6:15pm EST

By Aruna Viswanatha and Brett Wolf(Reuters) - HSBC Holdings Plc agreed to pay a record $1.92 billion in fines toU.S. authorities for allowing itself to be used to launder a river of drug moneyflowing out of Mexico and other banking lapses.Mexico's Sinaloa cartel and Colombia's Norte del Valle cartel between themlaundered $881 million through HSBC and a Mexican unit, the U.S. JusticeDepartment said on Tuesday.In a deferred prosecution agreement with the Justice Department, the bankacknowledged it failed to maintain an effective program against money launderingand failed to conduct basic due diligence on some of its account holders.Under the agreement, which was reported by Reuters last week, the bank agreedto take steps to fix the problems, forfeit $1.256 billion, and retain a compliancemonitor. The bank also agreed to pay $665 million in civil penalties to regulators including to the Office of the Comptroller of theCurrency, the Federal Reserve, and the Treasury Department."We accept responsibility for our past mistakes. We have said we are profoundly sorry for them, and we do so again. The HSBC oftoday is a fundamentally different organization from the one that made those mistakes," HSBC Chief Executive Stuart Gulliver said.THE PLACE TO LAUNDER MONEYHSBC's money-laundering lapses in Mexico and elsewhere were cited in an extensive Senate report earlier this year, but thedocuments filed in court on Tuesday provided new details.Despite the known risks of doing business in Mexico, the bank put the country in its lowest risk category, which excluded $670 billionin transactions from the monitoring systems, according to the documents.Bank officials repeatedly ignored internal warnings that HSBC's monitoring systems were inadequate, the Justice Department said. In2008, for example, the CEO of HSBC Mexico was told that Mexican law enforcement had a recording of a Mexican drug lord sayingthat HSBC Mexico was the place to launder money.Mexican traffickers used boxes specifically designed to the dimensions of an HSBC Mexico teller's window to deposit cash on a dailybasis.The agreement also described a vastly understaffed compliance department. At times, only one to four employees were responsiblefor reviewing alerts identifying suspicious wire transactions. When HSBC processed bulk cash, a business it calls Banknotes, onlyone or two compliance officials oversaw transactions for 500 to 600 customers, the Justice Department said.Compliance was "woefully inadequate," Loretta Lynch, the U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn, said at a press conference.SANCTIONS VIOLATIONSIn documents filed in federal court in Brooklyn, the Justice Department also charged the bank with violating sanctions laws by doingbusiness with customers in Iran, Libya, Sudan, Burma and Cuba.HSBC separately reached a settlement with British watchdog the Financial Services Authority."The HSBC settlement sends a powerful wakeup call to multinational banks about the consequences of disregarding theiranti-money laundering obligations," said Senator Carl Levin, who led the Senate inquiry.U.S. and European banks have now agreed to settlements with U.S. regulators totaling some $5 billion in recent years on chargesthey violated U.S. sanctions and failed to police potentially illicit transactions.No bank or bank executives have been indicted. Instead, prosecutors have used deferred prosecutions, under which criminalcharges against a firm are set aside if it agrees to conditions such as paying fines and changing its behavior."In trying to reach a result that's fair and just and powerful, you also have to look at the collateral consequences," DOJ criminal chiefLanny Breuer said at the Brooklyn press conference.The settlement is the third time in a decade that HSBC has been penalized for lax controls and ordered by U.S. authorities toimprove its monitoring of suspicious transactions. Previous directives by regulators to improve oversight came in 2003 and in 2010.

Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News | Reuters.com http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USBRE8BA05M20121211

1 of 2 12/11/2012 7:16 PM

Last month, HSBC told investors it had set aside $1.5 billion to cover fines or penalties stemming from the inquiry and warned thatcosts could be significantly higher.Analyst Jim Antos of Mizuho Securities said that while the fine was huge in cash terms, the settlement costs were "trivial" in terms ofthe company's book value.HSBC shares closed up 0.56 percent at 644.8 pence in London.ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROLSHSBC said it had increased spending on anti-money laundering systems by around nine times between 2009 and 2011, exitedbusiness relationships and clawed back bonuses for senior executives. As evidence of its determination to change, it cited the hiringlast January of Stuart Levey, a former top U.S. Treasury Department official, as chief legal officer.Under a five-year agreement with the Justice Department, HSBC agreed to have an independent monitor evaluate its progress inimproving its compliance.It also said that as part of the overhaul of its controls, it has launched a global review of its "Know Your Customer" files, which willcost an estimated $700 million over five years. The files are designed to ensure that banks do not unwittingly act as conduits forcriminal funds.HSBC's settlement comes a day after rival British bank Standard Chartered Plc agreed to a $327 million settlement with U.S. lawenforcement agencies for sanctions violations, a pact that follows a $340 million settlement the bank reached with the New York bankregulator in August.Such settlements have become commonplace. In what had been the largest settlement until this week, ING Bank NV in June agreedto pay $619 million to settle U.S. government allegations that it violated sanctions against countries including Cuba and Iran.In the United States, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co, Wachovia Corp and Citigroup Inc have been cited for anti-money laundering lapses orsanctions violations.HSBC's failings date to 2003, when the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and New York state regulators ordered it to bettermonitor suspicious money flows. In 2010, a consent order from the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) ordered HSBC to reviewsuspicious transactions. At the time, the OCC called HSBC's compliance program "ineffective."In 2008, the federal prosecutor in Wheeling, West Virginia, began investigating allegations that a local doctor used the bank tolaunder money from Medicare fraud.Ultimately, the prosecutor's office came to believe the case was "the tip of the iceberg" in terms of suspicious transactions conductedthrough HSBC, according to documents reviewed by Reuters and reported earlier this year.(Additional reporting by Lawrence White and Michael Flaherty in Hong Kong, Steve Slater in London, Jessica Dye in Brooklyn;Editing by Peter Graff, John Wallace and Alden Bentley)

© Thomson Reuters 2011. All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their ownpersonal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similarmeans, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registeredtrademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevantinterests.This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to colleagues, clients orcustomers, use the Reprints tool at the top of any article or visit: www.reutersreprints.com.

Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News | Reuters.com http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USBRE8BA05M20121211

2 of 2 12/11/2012 7:16 PM

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit N

7:29 PM EST

New YorkAfter

LondonClosed

TokyoOpen

December 11, 2012

View All

13,248.44+78.56

+0.60%DOW

3,022.30+35.34

+1.18%NASDAQ

1,427.84+9.29

+0.65%S&P 500

Latest News The Trading Deck

SEARCH

Major Banks, Governmental Officials and Their Comrade Capitalists Targ... http://www.marketwatch.com/story/major-banks-governmental-officials-a...

1 of 3 12/11/2012 7:30 PM


2 of 3 12/11/2012 7:30 PM

Copyright © 2012 MarketWatch, Inc. All rights reserved.By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy - UPDATED10/18/2011.

Intraday Data provided by SIX Financial Information and subject to terms of use. Historical and current end-of-day data provided by SIXFinancial Information. Intraday data delayed per exchange requirements. S&P/Dow Jones Indices (SM) from Dow Jones & Company, Inc.All quotes are in local exchange time. Real time last sale data provided by NASDAQ. More information on NASDAQ traded symbols andtheir current financial status. Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges. S&P/Dow Jones Indices(SM) from Dow Jones & Company, Inc. SEHK intraday data is provided by SIX Financial Information and is at least 60-minutes delayed.All quotes are in local exchange time.


3 of 3 12/11/2012 7:30 PM

AFFIDAVIT


beneficiary


Exhibit O

of 22


Current List of President Obama's Executive Orders

Posted by 1461 Days

This list is complete and current to December 21, 2012

President Obama has signed 146 Executive Orders to date during his Administration. The 1461 has included a Free Download of the Official Executive Orders as they become available in the Federal Registry.

The list was originally started here on the 1461 on January 25 2009.

I get emails from time to time asking why other blogs and websites list President Obama's Executive Orders in the hundreds even thousands and I show only the true count of the current number of Executive Orders.

The answer is simple - We don't need to lie or embellish the total number of Executive Orders - the Truth will Set you Free. Read my open response to the emails questioning the Executive Order count here.

Page 2 of 22

For ease of navigating the full list, the most recent orders are listed below here on the main page along with the rest of the Executive Orders. You can also view the list broken out by year by clicking on the following links: (Scroll down for the 2012 Executive Orders)

President Obama's Executive Orders issued in 2011



Learn more about the Constitutional right to use the Presidential Executive Order and what other Presidents have written Executive Orders and how they have used the Power of the Executive Order by clicking here.

Some of you have asked about former President George W Bush's Executive Orders. I am assembling the EO list for President George W Bush now. You can view and download the Executive Orders from the first years of the George W Bush Administration here.

Executive Orders become law if unchallenged by the Congress 30 days after they are submitted. They must also be published in the Federal Register.

The Listing of Executive orders in the Congressional Library runs in a numeric order starting with the first Executive orders passed until the most current. When President Barack Obama took office his EO list started from #EO-13489

Do you know which President issued the most Executive Orders? Click here to find out who.

Updates and edits to this page are made as soon as new Executive orders are released and published to the Internet for review.

1461 Days of Executive Power - the book will be available soon. You can request your copy by sending an email to [email protected] Currently we have nearly 1,000 copies on request! Sales are not open yet, please do not send money for the book.

Each item below has a link to the Executive Order or a PDF of the signed document for your review as they are made available. All links open in a new window.

The List of President Obama's Executive Orders runs in descending order from the most recent.

December 21, 2012

Executive Order: Closing of Executive Departments and Agencies of the Federal Government

Executive Order: Reestablishment of Advisory Commission

of 22

December 7, 2012

Executive Order: Establishing the Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force

Executive Order: Reestablishment of Advisory Group

December 6, 2012

Executive Order: Establishment of an Interagency Task Force on Commercial Advocacy

October 26, 2012

Executive Order13629: Establishing the White House Homeland Security Partnership Council

October 9, 2012

Executive Order 13628: Authorizing the Implementation of Certain Sanctions Set Forth in the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 and Additional Sanctions with respect to Iran

September 25, 2012

Executive Order 13627: Strengthening Protections Against Trafficking In Persons In Federal Contracts

September 10, 2012

Executive Order 13626: Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration

August 31, 2012

Executive Order 13625: Improving Access to Mental Health Services for Veterans, Service Members, and Military Families

August 30, 2012

Executive Order 13624: Accelerating Investment in Industrial Energy Efficiency

August 10, 2012

Executive Order 13623: Preventing and Responding to Violence Against Women and Girls Globally

Page 4 of 22

July 31, 2012

Executive Order 13622: Authorizing Additional Sanctions With Respect To Iran

July 26, 2012

Executive Order 13621: White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans

July 20, 2012

Executive Order 13620: Taking Additional Steps to Address the National Emergency with Respect to Somalia

July 11, 2012

Executive Order 13619: Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Burma

July 6, 2012

Executive Order 13618: Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions

June 25, 2012

Executive Order 13617: Russian Highly Enriched Uranium

June 14, 2012

Executive Order 13616: Accelerating Broadband Infrastructure Deployment

May 21, 2012

Executive Order 13615: Providing an Order of Succession within the Office of Management and Budget

Executive Order 13614: Providing an Order of Succession within the Environmental Protection Agency

Executive Order 13613: Providing an Order of Succession within the Department of Commerce

Executive Order 13612: Providing an Order of Succession within the Department of Agriculture

May 16, 2012

of 22

Executive Order: Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen

May 10, 2012

Executive Order - Identifying and Reducing Regulatory Burdens

May 1 2012

Executive Order - Prohibiting Certain Transactions with and Suspending Entry into the United States of Foreign Sanctions Evaders with Respect to Iran and Syria

Executive Order - Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation

April 27, 2012

Executive Order - Establishing Principles of Excellence for Educational Institutions Serving Service Members, Veterans, Spouses, and Other Family Members

April 23, 2012

Executive Order - Blocking the Property and Suspending Entry into the United States of Certain Persons with Respect to Grave Human Rights Abuses by the Governments of Iran and Syria viaInformation Technology

April 13, 2012

Executive Order - Supporting Safe and Responsible Development of Unconventional Domestic Natural Gas Resources

March 22, 2012

Executive Order - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects

March 16, 2012

Executive Order - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects

Executive Order - National Defense Resources Preparedness

March 15, 2012

Executive Order - Establishing a White House Council on Strong Cities, Strong Communities

Page 6 of 22

February 28, 2012

Executive Order - Establishment of the Interagency Trade Enforcement Center

February 9, 2012

Executive Order - Establishing the President's Global Development Council

February 6, 2012

Executive Order - Blocking Property of the Government of Iran and Iranian Financial Institutions

January 27, 2012

Executive Order 13598 - Assignment of Functions Relating to Certain Promotion and Appointment Actions in the Armed Forces

January 19, 2012

Executive Order 13597 - Establishing Visa and Foreign Visitor Processing Goals and the Task Force on Travel and Competitiveness

December 19, 2011

Executive Order 13596 - Amendments to Executive Orders 12131 and 13539

Executive Order 13594 - Instituting a National Action Plan on Women, Peace, and Security

Executive Order 13595 - Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay

December 13, 2011

Executive Order 13593 - 2011 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States

December 2, 2011

Executive Order 13592 - Improving American Indian and Alaska Native Educational Opportunities and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities

of 22

November 23, 2011

Executive Order 13591 - Continuance of Certain Federal Advisory Committees

November 21, 2011

Executive Order 13590 - Iran Sanctions

November 9, 2011

Executive Order 13589 - Promoting Efficient Spending

October 31, 2011

Executive Order 13588 - Reducing Prescription Drug Shortages

October 7, 2011

Executive Order 13587 - Structural Reforms to Improve the Security of Classified Networks and the Responsible Sharing and Safeguarding of Classified Information

October 6, 2011

Executive Order 13586 - Emergency Board to Investigate Disputes Between Certain Railroads

September 30, 2011

Executive Order 13585 - Continuance of Certain Federal Advisory Committees

September 9, 2011

Executive Order 13584 - Developing an Integrated Strategic Counterterrorism Communications Initiative

August 18, 2011

Executive Order 13583 - Establishing a Coordinated Government-wide Initiative to Promote Diversity and Inclusion in the Federal Workforce

Executive Order 13582 - Blocking Property of the Government of Syria and Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Syria

Page 8 of 22

July 25, 2011

Executive Order 13581 - Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations

July 12, 2011

Executive Order 13580 - Inter-agency Working Group on Coordination of Domestic Energy Development and Permitting in Alaska

July 11, 2011

Executive Order 13579 - Regulation and Independent Regulatory Agencies

July 6, 2011

Executive Order 13578 - Coordinating Policies on Automotive Communities and Workers

June 15, 2011

Executive Order 13577 - Select USA Initiative

June 13, 2011

Executive Order 13576 - Delivering an Efficient, Effective, and Accountable Government

June 9, 2011

Executive Order 13575: Establishment of the White House Rural Council

May 23, 2011

Executive Order 13574: AUTHORIZING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN SANCTIONS SET FORTH IN THE IRAN SANCTIONS ACT OF 1996, AS AMENDED

May 18, 2011

Executive Order 13573: Blocking Property of Senior Officials of the Government of Syria

of 22

April 29, 2011

Executive Order 13572: Blocking Property of Certain Persons with Respect to Human Rights Abuses in Syria

April 27, 2011

Executive Order 13571: Streamlining Service Delivery and Improving Customer Service

April 18, 2011

Executive Order 13570: Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to North Korea

April 5, 2011

Executive Order 13569: Amendments to Executive Orders 12824, 12835, 12859, and 13532, Reestablishment Pursuant to Executive Order 13498, and Revocation of Executive Order 13507

March 8, 2011

Executive Order 13568: Extending Provisions of the International Organization Immunities Act

March 7, 2011

Executive Order 13567: Periodic Review of Individuals Detained at Guantánamo Bay Naval Station Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force

February 25, 2011

Executive Order 13566: BLOCKING PROPERTY AND PROHIBITINGCERTAIN TRANSACTIONS RELATED TO LIBYA

February 8, 2011

Executive Order 13565: Establishment of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Advisory Committees

January 31, 2011

Executive Order 13564: Establishment of the President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness

Page 10 of 22

January 18, 2011

Executive Order 13563 Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

December 27, 2010

Executive Order 13562 Recruiting and Hiring Students and Recent Graduates

December 22, 2010

Executive Order 13561 Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay

December 14, 2010

Executive Order 13560 White House Council for Community Solutions

November 17, 2010

Executive Order 13559 Fundamental Principles and Policy-making Criteria for Partnerships with Faith-Based and Other Neighborhood Organizations

November 9, 2010

Executive Order 13558 Export Coordination Enforcement Center

November 4, 2010

Executive Order 13557 Controlled Unclassified Information

Executive Order 13556 Order of Succession Within the Department of Justice

October 19, 2010

Executive Order 13555 White House Initiative On Educational Excellence For Hispanics

October 5, 2010

Executive Order 13554 Establishing the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force

of 22

September 29, 2010

Executive Order 13553 Designating Iranian Officials Responsible for or Complicit in Serious Human Rights Abuses

August 31, 2010

Executive Order 13552 2010 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial

August 30, 2010

Executive Order 13551 Blocking Property of Certain Persons with Respect to North Korea

August 18, 2010

Executive Order 13550 Establishment of Pakistan and Afghanistan Support Office

Executive Order 13549 Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Entities

July 26, 2010

Executive Order 13548 Increasing Federal Employment of Individuals With Disabilities

July 19, 2010

Executive Order 13547 Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes

July 2, 2010

Executive Order 13546 Optimizing the Security of Biological Select Agents and Toxins in the United States

June 23, 2010

Executive Order 13545 the President's Council on Fitness, Sports, and Nutrition

Page 12 of 22

June 10, 2010

Executive Order 13544: Establishing the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council

May 22, 2010

Executive Order 13543: Establishing the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling

May 13, 2010

Executive Order 13542: Establishing an Order of Succession Within the Department of Agriculture

May 10, 2010

Executive Order 13541 - Temporary Organization to Facilitate a Strategic Partnership with the Republic of Iraq

This Executive Order establishes a temporary organization to be known as the Iraq Strategic Partnership Office within the Department of State, in accordance with section 3161 of title 5 of United States Code.

The organization main directive is to support executive departments and agencies in transitioning to a strategic partnership with the Republic of Iraq in economic, diplomatic, cultural, and security fields based on the Strategic Framework Agreement.

Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Establishing the Temporary Organization to Facilitate a Strategic Partnership with the Republic of Iraq

April 26, 2010

Executive Order 13540 - Inter-agency Task Force on Veterans Small Business Development

This Executive Order calls for the establishment of a inter-agency task force within the Small Business Administration to promote Veterans Small Business Development initiatives. The task force will be made up of eleven members with four of those members being representatives from a veterans' service or military organization or association, who shall be appointed by the Administrator.

of 22

Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Establishing the Inter-agency Task Force on Veterans Small Business Development

April 21, 2010

Executive Order 13539 - President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology

This Executive Order establishes a 21 member advisory council on science, technology, and innovation that will report to the President. One member of the PCAST will be the the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and will be designated as the Science Advisor. The remaining 20 members will be made up of individuals and representatives from sectors outside of the Federal Government appointed by the President.

Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Establishing the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology

April 19, 2010

Executive Order 13538 - Establishing the President's Management Advisory Board

This Executive Order establishes within the General Services Administration (GSA) the President's Management Advisory Board (PMAB).

The PMAB will provide the President and the President's Management Council advice and recommendations on effective strategies for the implementation of best business practices on matters related to Federal Government management and operation, with a particular focus on productivity, the application of technology, and customer service.

The PMAB shall be advisory in function only.

Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Establishing the President's Management Advisory Board

April 14, 2010

Executive Order 13537 - Inter-agency Group on Insular Areas

This Executive Order establishes the Inter-agency Group on Insular Areas (IGIA) to address policies concerning Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (Insular Areas). This group will be formed within the Department of the Interior for administrative purposes.

Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Creating the Inter-agency Group on Insular Areas

Page 14 of 22

April 13, 2010

Executive Order 13536 - Regarding Blocking Properties of Persons Tied to the Conflict in Somalia

This executive order invokes the use of previously established laws and international guidelines to block and remove available monetary influence of certain individuals in Somalia.

The executive order is comprised of 9 sections. To review the executive order in full use the link at the bottom of this section.

Section one of the executive order states that All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, including any overseas branch, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: (i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order; and(ii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State:

to have engaged in acts that directly or indirectly threaten the peace, security, or stability of Somalia.

Review the Executive Order Annex by clicking on the following link: Annex to the Executive Order Regarding Persons with Direct Interest in Somalia

Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Regarding Somalia

March 24, 2010

Executive Order 13535 - Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Consistency with Longstanding Restrictions on the Use of Federal Funds for Abortion

This executive order establishes an adequate enforcement mechanism to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services, except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered, consistent with a longstanding Federal statutory restriction that is commonly known as the Hyde Amendment. The Act maintains current Hyde Amendment restrictions governing abortion policy and extends those restrictions to the newly created health insurance exchanges. Under the Act, longstanding Federal laws to protect conscience (such as the Church Amendment, 42 U.S.C. 300a-7, and the Weldon Amendment, section 508(d)(1) of Public Law 111-8) remain intact and new protections prohibit discrimination against health care facilities and health care providers because of an unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.

of 22

The Act establishes a new Community Health Center (CHC) Fund within HHS, which provides additional Federal funds for the community health center program.

Review the EO by clicking on the following link: Restrictions on the Use of Federal Funds for Abortion

March 11, 2010

Executive Order - National Export Initiative

The National Export Initiative (NEI) shall be an Administration initiative to improve conditions that directly affect the private sector's ability to export. The NEI will help meet my Administration's goal of doubling exports over the next 5 years by working to remove trade barriers abroad, by helping firms -- especially small businesses -- overcome the hurdles to entering new export markets, by assisting with financing, and in general by pursuing a Government-wide approach to export advocacy abroad, among other steps.

This EO also creates an NEI Cabinet to be known as the Export Promotion Cabinet. The Export Promotion Cabinet shall meet periodically and report to the President on the progress of the NEI.

Review the EO by clicking on the following link: National Export Initiative

March 1, 2010

Executive Order establishing an Order of Succession within the Department of Defense

Department of Defense, in the EO's listed order shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of the Secretary of Defense during any period in which the Secretary has died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of the Secretary, until such time as the Secretary is able to perform the functions and duties of that office.

This EO revokes Executive Order 13394 of December 22, 2005 (Providing An Order of Succession Within the Department of Defense - enacted by former President George W. Bush), is hereby revoked.

Review the EO by clicking on the following link: Order of Succession within the Department of Defense

February 26, 2010

Promoting Excellence, Innovation, and Sustainability at Historically Black Colleges and Universities

Executive order to establish a White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and

Page 16 of 22

Universities. The department to be formed by this EO will be housed in the Department of Education. The initiative shall work with other executive departments, agencies, and offices, the private sector, educational associations, philanthropic organizations, and other partners to increase the capacity of HBCUs ("historically black colleges and universities" shall mean those institutions listed in 34 C.F.R. 602.8) to provide the highest-quality education to a greater number of students, and to take advantage of these institutions' capabilities in serving the Nation's needs through five core tasks.

Executive Order 13256 of February 12, 2002, as enacted by former President George W. Bush is revoked by mandate of this EO. EO 13256 revoked Executive Order 12876 of November 1, 1993 enacted by former President Bill Clinton.

Review the EO by clicking on the following link: Executive Order creating HBCU Initiative.

February 18, 2010

the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility & Reform.

Executive order to form a bipartisan "fiscal responsibility commission" that will act as a think tank and advise the President and administration on ways to cut the deficit.

The Commission shall be composed of 18 members, 6 members are appointed by the President, no more than 4 of whom shall be from the same political party, 3 members are to be selected by the Majority Leader of the Senate from current Senate members, 3 members are to be selected by the Speaker of the House of Representatives from current House members, 3 members selected by the Minority Leader of the Senate from current Senate members and 3 members selected by the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives from current House members.

Review the EO by clicking on the following link: Executive Order creating the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility & Reform.

January 17, 2010

Executive Order calling Selected Reserve and Certain Individual Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty

The Executive Order allows the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security to add personal in support of targeted functions associated with the humanitarian relief effort in Haiti. For instance, it will allow the activation of reserve medical personnel to replace those deployed on the hospital ship Comfort and allow for the deployment of a Coast Guard unit that will help provide port security.

See the full executive order as well as a PDF of the EO by clicking the following link: ExecutiveOrder Ordering the Selected Reserve and Certain Individual Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty

of 22

January 11, 2010

Executive Order Establishing Council of Governors

An Executive Order establishing a Council of Governors to strengthen further the partnership between the Federal Government and State Governments to protect our Nation against all types of hazards. When appointed, the Council will be reviewing such matters as involving the National Guard of the various States; homeland defense; civil support; synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities.

See the full executive order as well as a PDF of the EO by clicking the following link: ExecutiveOrder Establishing Council of Governors

December 30, 2009

Executive Order: Medical Countermeasures Following a Biological Attack

Establishing Federal capability for the timely provision of medical countermeasures following a biological attack.

See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Medical Countermeasures Following a Biological Attack

December 29, 2009

Executive Order - Original Classification Authority

Designating the Authority to place Classifications

See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Original Classification Authority

December 29, 2009

Executive Order - Classified National Security Information

This order prescribes a uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying national security information, including information relating to defense against transnational terrorism. Our democratic principles require that the American people be informed of the activities of their Government. Also, our Nation's progress depends on the free flow of information both within the Government and to the American people. Nevertheless, throughout our history, the national defense has required that certain information be maintained in confidence in order to protect our citizens, our democratic institutions, our homeland security, and our interactions with foreign nations. Protecting information critical to our Nation's security and demonstrating our commitment to open Government through accurate and accountable application of classification standards and routine, secure, and effective declassification are equally important priorities.

Page 18 of 22

See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Classified National Security Information

December 23, 2009

Executive Order -- Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay

Modifications to Government pay scales.

See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay

December 17, 2009

Executive Order -- Amending Executive Order 12425

International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by

The Original EO by Ronald Reagan: EO 12425

The original EO was amended once before by : EO 12971 on September 15, 1995

See the full executive order by clicking the following link: EO 13524 Amending Executive Order 12425

December 11, 2009

Executive Order: Half-Day Closing of Executive Departments and Agencies on Thursday, December 24, 2009

All executive branch departments and agencies of the Federal Government shall be closed and their employees excused from duty for the last half of the scheduled workday on Thursday, December 24, 2009, the day before Christmas Day, except as provided in section 2 of this order.

See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Half-Day Closing

December 09, 2009

Executive Order: Creating Labor-Management Forums To Improve Delivery of Government Services

The Council shall advise the President on matters involving labor-management relations in the executive branch.

of 22

See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Labor-Management Forums

November 23, 2009

Executive Order-- Reducing Improper Payments and Eliminating Waste in Federal Programs

The purpose of this order is to reduce improper payments by intensifying efforts to eliminate payment error, waste, fraud, and abuse in the major programs administered by the Federal Government, while continuing to ensure that Federal programs serve and provide access to their intended beneficiaries.

See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Reducing Improper Payments

November 17, 2009

Executive Order - Establishment of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force

This EO is to establish an interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force (Task Force) led by the Department of Justice. The Task Force shall be chaired by the Attorney General.

See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force

November 09, 2009

Executive Order - Veterans Employment Initiative

This Executive order calls for the Employment of Veterans in the Federal Government. See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Veterans Employment Initiative

October 30, 2009

Amendments to Executive Orders 13183 and 13494.

See the current full executive order by clicking the following link:

Executive order to Amend Executive Orders 13183 and 13494

October 29, 2009

Order to Amend Executive Order 13462

An amendment to the privious executive order # 13462 signed on February 29, 2008 by then President George W. Bush

Page 20 of 22

Click on the link to view the original executive order 13462

See the current full executive order by clicking the following link:

Executive order to Amend Executive Order 13462

October 14, 2009

INCREASING PARTICIPATION OF ASIAN AMERICANS AND PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN FEDERAL PROGRAMS

The purpose of this order is to establish an Advisory Commission on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and a White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. Each will work to improve the quality of life and opportunities for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders through increased access to, and participation in, Federal programs in which they may be underserved. In addition, each will work to advance relevant evidence-based research, data collection, and analysis for AAPI populations and subpopulations.

See the full 5 page executive order by clicking the following link:

Executive order for Increasing Participation of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in Federal Programs

October 05, 2009

Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance

This executive order sets sustainability goals for Federal agencies and focuses on making improvements in their environmental, energy and economic performance. The Executive Order requires Federal agencies to set a 2020 greenhouse gas emissions reduction target within 90 days; increase energy efficiency; reduce fleet petroleum consumption; conserve water; reduce waste; support sustainable communities; and leverage Federal purchasing power to promote environmentally-responsible products and technologies.

See the full 15 page executive order by clicking the following link: Executive order for the Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance

October 1, 2009

Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging while Driving

Section two of this executive order states "Text Messaging While Driving by Federal Employees. Federal employees shall not engage in text messaging (a) when driving GOV, or when driving POV while on official Government business, or (b) when using electronic equipment supplied by the Government while driving."

of 22

The order is to go into effect 90 days from date of issue according to section 4. See the full executive order including sections 1 thru 7 here by clicking the following link: Executive order for the Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging while Driving

September 29, 2009

The Continuance of Certain Advisory Committees

Per Section 1 of this Executive Order the following advisory committees are to be continued until September 30, 2011. (a) Committee for the Preservation of the White House (b) National Infrastructure Advisory Council (c) Federal Advisory Council on Occupational Safety and Health (d) President's Board of Advisors on Historically Black Colleges and Universities (e) President's Board of Advisors on Tribal Colleges and Universities (f) President's Commission on White House Fellowships (g) President's Committee for People with Intellectual Disabilities (h) President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities (i) President's Committee on the International Labor Organization (j) President's Committee on the National Medal of Science (k) President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports (l) President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (m) President's Export Council (n) President's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (o) Trade and Environment Policy Advisory Committee

See the full executive order including sections 2, 3 and 4 here by clicking the following link: Executive order for the Continuance of Certain Federal Advisory Committees

June 23, 2009

Establishment of a White House Council on automotive communities and workers

May 12, 2009

Executive Order Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration

April 8, 2009

Executive Order Establishing The White House Office Of Health Reform

March 11, 2009

Executive Order Creating the White House Council on Women and Girls

March 9, 2009

Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving Human Stem CellsFebruary 20, 2009

Amending Executive Order 13390

Page 22 of 22

February 19, 2009

Executive Order: Establishment of the White House Office of Urban Affairs

February 6, 2009

Presidential Executive Order Establishing the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board

USE OF PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENTS FOR FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

February 5, 2009

Executive Order - Further Amendments To Executive Order 12859, Establishment Of The Domestic Policy Council

Executive Order: Further Amendments to Executive Order 12835, Establishment of the National Economic Council

Amendments to Executive Order 13199 and Establishment of the President's Advisory Council for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships

January 30, 2009

Executive Order 13497: Revocation Of Certain Executive Orders Concerning Regulatory Planning And Review

Executive Order 13496: Notification of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor Laws

Executive Order 13495: Non-displacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts

Executive Order 13494: Economy in Government Contracting

January 22, 2009

Executive Order 13493: Review of Detention Policy Options

Executive Order 13492: Review and Disposition of Individuals Detained at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base and Close of Detention Facilities

Executive Order 13491: Ensuring Lawful Interrogations

January 21, 2009

EO 13490: Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Personnel

EO 13489: Presidential Records

united states court of appeals - Scanned Retina

Documents

Transcript of united states court of appeals - Scanned Retina