Understanding Marijuana
Transcript of Understanding Marijuana
DRUG ABUSE 2
Abstract
According to the National Institute of Drug Addiction (NIDA,
2011), drug addiction is defined as a chronic relapsing brain
disease expressed in the form of compulsive behaviors. With over
29 million users in the United States in 2010, marijuana is the
most popular and commonly-abused illicit drug in the United
States. Yet, marijuana has a low addiction rate and is rarely
accompanied by withdrawal symptoms. This paper explores and
clarifies the current understanding of marijuana by examining how
marijuana is abused, its additional adverse effects on mental and
physical health and daily living, current treatment options for
marijuana dependence, and current trends in its use and addiction
research. Current issues in marijuana research indicate that
marijuana addiction is psychologically-complex, that it is a
disturbance of decision making, that it is not limited to drugs,
and that it involves many transmitters.
DRUG ABUSE 3
Understanding Marijuana
Although twentieth-century research on the nature of drug
abuse was filtered through the perceptual sieve of powerful myths
and misconceptions, today’s scientific research has dramatically
altered the current views and responses to drug addiction by
making groundbreaking discoveries about the mechanisms of the
brain that have revolutionized the understanding of drug abuse
and addiction as a chronic relapsing brain disease expressed in
the form of compulsive behaviors (National Institute of Drug
DRUG ABUSE 4
Abuse [NIDA], 2011). As a result of current research, scientists
have now identified many of the biological and environmental
factors of drug abuse and are beginning to search for the genetic
variations that contribute to the development and progression of
the disease (NIDA, 2011). Although this knowledge has enabled
scientists to develop effective prevention and treatment
approaches that reduce the toll drug abuse takes on individuals,
families, and communities, it has not only raised a number of
issues that have been the focus of current research, but has left
a gap in the understanding as to why individuals become addicted
to certain drugs or how drugs alter the brain to foster
compulsive drug abuse (NIDA, 2011; Pinel, 2011).
The purpose of this paper is to decrease the above gap by
providing scientific information about the disease of drug
addiction as it applies to a specific drug: marijuana, one of the
most commonly-abused and misunderstood drugs in the United States
(NIDA, 2011). Although marijuana is also one of the most popular
illegal drugs, people continue to form their opinions and
repertoires of understanding and knowledge on the myths and
misconceptions of the past. How is marijuana abused? Is
DRUG ABUSE 5
marijuana addictive? What treatment options are available? What
are the current trends in research on marijuana? This paper
answers these questions and clarifies the current understanding
of marijuana by discussing how marijuana is abused (i.e.,
chemical composition, how it affects the brain and its addictive
potential), its additional adverse effects on mental and physical
health, current treatment options, and current trends in its use
and addiction research.
Marijuana Abuse
Defining Marijuana. Marijuana is the name commonly given to
the mix of dried and shredded leaves, stems, seeds, and flowers
of the common hemp plant, Cannabis sativa (Pinel, 2011). Most people
report experiencing its pungent and distinctive odor of sweet and
sour smells throughout an increasing number of public and private
facilities (NIDA, 2011). The usual modes of consuming marijuana
are through: 1) smoking the leaves in a joint (a marijuana
cigarette) or pipe; or 2) ingesting them orally (i.e., brewed as tea
or baked in an oil-rich substrate [i.e., butter, chocolate
brownie, cookie, or cupcake] to promote absorption from the
gastrointestinal tract) (Pinel, 2011). Street names for marijuana
DRUG ABUSE 6
include pot, ganga, weed, Alice B. Tokely Brownies, Mary Jane, grass, 420, joints,
blunts (cigars that have been emptied of tobacco and refilled with
a mixture of marijuana and tobacco), or chronic (NIDA, 2011; Pinel,
2011).
Behavioral Effects. Although the marijuana plant contains
several hundred compounds, the psychoactive effects of marijuana
can be attributed to over 80 cannabinoids (active chemicals), most
of which can be found in the sticky resin coating the plant’s
leaves and flowers (Pinel, 2011; Smith et al., 2010). While most
of the psychoactive effects are attributable to a single
cannabinoid called THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol), the
resin’s psychoactive effects can also be enhanced by extracting
and drying them to make hashish (a dark corklike material) or hash
oil (an extremely potent product produced by further processing
hashish) (Pinel, 2011). Although the effects of a typical social
dose of marijuana tend to be subtle, high doses of marijuana have
been shown to impair psychological functions through short-term
memory impairments, distorted perceptions, slowed reaction time,
altered judgment and decision-making, difficulty thinking and
solving problems involving multiple steps to reach a specific
DRUG ABUSE 7
goal, and impairing communication skills (i.e., slurred speech,
short attention span) (NIDA, 2011; Pinel, 2011). Common effects
of marijuana abuse also include euphoria, calmness, emotional
intensification, sensory and time distortion, feelings of
paranoia, impaired coordination, and motor impairment (NIDA,
2011; Pinel, 2011).
Effects on Brain Mechanisms. Since the early 1990s, research
on THC has drastically changed the understanding of how marijuana
acts on the brain to produce its effects (NIDA, 2011; Pinel,
2011). Research has shown that when a person smokes marijuana,
THC immediately passes through the lungs into the bloodstream,
which carries it to the brain and other organs of the body (NIDA,
2011). In the brain, THC binds to specific sites called
cannabinoid receptors (CB1, the most prevalent G-protein-linked
receptor in the brain, and CB2, which is found in the brain stem
and in the cells of the immune system), starting a cellular
chain-reaction that ultimately produces the “high” that most
marijuana smokers experience and chase (Filbey et al., 2010;
Gómez-Ruiz et al., 2007; NIDA, 2011; Pinel, 2011). While some
areas of the brain have many cannabinoid receptors and others
DRUG ABUSE 8
have few or none, the highest density of receptors is found in
the frontal regions of the cerebral cortex and in the
hippocampus; areas responsible for executive functioning
processes such as decision making, planning, problem solving,
focused attention, response inhibition, cognitive flexibility,
working memory, several types of memory, concentrating, sensory
and time perception, visuospatial working memory, and coordinated
movement (NIDA, 2011; Smith et al., 2010). Understanding why
these THC receptors exist in the human brain has been greatly
enhanced by the recent discovery of a class of endogenous
cannabinoid neurotransmitters called endocannabinoids and the
isolation and characterization of the first endocannabinoid
neurotransmitter, anandamide (meaning “internal bliss”) (Gómez-
Ruiz et al., 2007; Pinel, 2011).
One study (Smith, Longo, Fried, Hogan & Cameron, 2010) used
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the
effects of marijuana use on visuospatial working memory, the process
involved in the storage and manipulation of visuospatial
information for a short amount of time, followed by retrieval
(Smith et al, 2010). Participants were 19-21-year- old members of
DRUG ABUSE 9
the Ottawa Prenatal Prospective Study, a longitudinal study that
collected a unique body of information on participants from
infancy to young adulthood including prenatal drug history,
detailed cognitive/behavioral performance, and current and past
drug usage (Smith et al., 2010). Ten marijuana users (6 males, 4
females, mean age 20) and 14 nonusing controls (9 males, 5
females, mean age 20) were imaged for regular use of marijuana
use, which was defined as >1 joint/week (Smith et al., 2010).
Participants reported an average of 11.48 joints per week (range:
2 – 37.5 joints/week) on a regular basis for an average of 4.55
years (Smith et al., 2010). Prior to imaging, participants from
both groups previously completed a comprehensive psychological
battery including, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III
(Wechsler 1997), the NEO Personality Inventory (Costa and McCrae
1989), the Computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule for
Children, and a self-report drug questionnaire, which requested
information on current and past marijuana use, as well as other
drug use (Smith et al., 2010). The 10 marijuana users and 14
nonusing controls then performed a visuospatial 2-back task while
fMRI blood oxygen level-dependent response was examined (Smith et
DRUG ABUSE 10
al., 2010). Findings indicated that despite similar tasks
performance, marijuana users had significantly greater activation
in the inferior and middle frontal gyri, regions of the brain
normally associated with visuospatial working memory (Smith et
al., 2010). In addition, marijuana users had greater activation
in the right superior temporal gyrus, a region of the bran not
usually associated with visuospatial working memory tasks (Smith
et al., 2010).
Addiction Potential. Research shows marijuana’s addiction
potential to be low, with most people only using occasionally,
only about 10% using daily, and most people trying it in their
teens and curtailing use by the 30s or 40s (Pinel, 2011). Long-
term, regular marijuana abuse can lead to compulsive drug-seeking
and continued use despite the known harmful effects upon family,
school, work, and recreational functioning; both signs of
addiction (NIDA, 2011). Research estimates suggest a 9% addiction
rate among users, with an increase to 17% among those who start
young, and an increase to 25-30% among daily users (NIDA, 2011).
Tolerance to marijuana develops with sustained use, with long-
term abusers who are trying to quit reporting obvious withdrawal
DRUG ABUSE 11
symptoms (i.e., nausea, vomiting, sweating, diarrhea, sweating,
chills, irritability, sleeplessness, decreased appetite, tremors,
anxiety, and drug craving) beginning within 1 day following
cessation, peaking at 2-3 days, and subsiding within 1 or 2 weeks
(NIDA, 2011; Pinel, 2011). It must be noted, however, that these
symptoms are rare, except in contrived laboratory situations in
which massive oral doses are administered (Pinel, 2011).
Effects on Mental and Physical Health
Marijuana and Mental Health. A number of studies have shown
a correlation between chronic or heavy marijuana use and
increased rates of anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia (NIDA,
2011; Pinel, 2011). Some of these studies have also linked early
marijuana use to chronic or addictive problems later on (NIDA,
2011). These correlations have erroneously led many to conclude
that marijuana causes anxiety, depression, or schizophrenia or
that early marijuana use causes chronic use or addiction (Pinel,
2011). However, correlational evidence does not show causation;
it only demonstrates that a relationship exists between marijuana
and the increased rates of these mental problems (Pinel, 2011).
DRUG ABUSE 12
While chronic use of marijuana may not have been caused by
early use of the drug, chronic marijuana use in a very young
person may be a marker of risk for mental illnesses (including
addiction) stemming from genetic or environmental vulnerabilities
(i.e., early exposure to stress or violence) NIDA, 2011). One
study (Moore et al., 2007) linked high doses of marijuana with
acute psychotic reactions and with triggering the onset or
relapse of schizophrenia in vulnerable individuals. Once again,
however, this study shows correlation, not causation; an
observation that demonstrates that more research is required to
understand the causal factors involved in these correlations.
Effects on Physical Health. In addition to being linked to
anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia, marijuana adversely
affects the heart, lungs, and daily life. Research shows, for
example, that because marijuana increases the heart rate by 20 to
100% within the first hour after smoking, marijuana users
(especially older users or those with cardiac vulnerabilities)
have a 4.8-fold increased risk of palpitations, arrhythmias, and
heart attack within that same time period (NIDA, 2011). Studies
also show that marijuana contains 50 to 70% more carcinogenic
DRUG ABUSE 13
hydrocarbons than tobacco smoke (Lee & Hancox, 2011; NIDA, 2011).
To date, only two health hazards have been documented as being
caused by long-term, regular marijuana use: 1) the 10% of
marijuana smokers who smoke it regularly for long periods tend to
develop the same respiratory problems as tobacco smokers (i.e.,
cough, phlegm production, bronchitis, asthma, frequent acute
chest illness, and a heightened risk of lung infection; and 2)
because marijuana produces tachycardia, single large doses can
trigger heart attack in vulnerable individuals with a history of
previous heart attacks (Lee & Hancox, 2011; Pinel, 2011).
Furthermore, research demonstrates that heavy marijuana use
affects daily life by impairing several quality-of-life measures
(i.e., physical and mental health, cognitive abilities, social
life, and career status) and work measures (i.e., absences,
tardiness, accidents, workers’ compensation claims, and job
turnover) (NIDA, 2011).
Treatment Options
Although no medications are currently available, current
treatment options for marijuana abuse, dependence, or addiction
include behavioral interventions, cognitive-behavioral therapy,
DRUG ABUSE 14
and motivational incentives, such as providing vouchers for goods
or services to patients who remain abstinent (NIDA, 2011). The
most current treatment data on marijuana indicates that those in
treatment for primary marijuana abuse comprised 17% (322,000; 74%
male, 49% White, 30% between 12 and 17 years old) of those
admitted to U.S. treatment facilities in 2008, with 56% of those
in treatment for primary marijuana abuse having begun use by age
14 (NID, 2011).
Current Trends
Marijuana Abuse in the United States. As the most widespread
illicit drug used in the U.S. in 2010, more than 29 million
Americans (11.5%) aged 12 or older reported abusing marijuana in
2009; a significant increase over rates reported each year
between 2002 and 2008 (NIDA, 2011). According to NIDA-funded
Monitoring the Future Study of marijuana use among 8th, 10th, and 12th
graders, the decline in marijuana use that began in the mid-
1990’s is now demonstrated by past month usage of 8.0% in 8th
graders, 16.7% in 10th graders, and 21.4% in 12th graders, or 1
in 5 seniors (NIDA, 2011). Not surprisingly, marijuana use now
exceeds tobacco in reported past month use among 12th graders and
DRUG ABUSE 15
there is an increased rate of daily marijuana use reported in all
three grades, with 12th graders showing a 6.1% prevalence rate
for daily marijuana use, the highest reported since the early
1980's (NIDA, 2011).
Current Trends in Research. Current trends in marijuana
research have focused on its potential medicinal or therapeutic
properties (NIDA, 2011; Pinel, 2011). THC has demonstrated
remarkable potential for suppressing nausea and vomiting in
cancer patients, stimulating the appetite of AIDS patients,
blocking seizures, dilating bronchioles of asthmatics, decreasing
ocular pressure and the severity of glaucoma, and reducing
anxiety, some kinds of pain, and the symptoms of multiple
sclerosis (NIDA, 2011; Pinel, 2011). Cannabis-based medications
include synthetic compounds such as dronabinol (Marinol®), nabilone
(Cesamet®), and Sativex®, a mouth spray formulated to relieve
cancer-associated pain, spasticity, neuropathy, and the
neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis (Kavia et al., 2010; NIDA,
2011). While dronabinol and nabilone have been approved by the
U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA), Sativex® has only
DRUG ABUSE 16
recently been approved in Canada for the relief of neuropathic
pain in MS (Wright, 2007).
One study (Wright, 2007) reviewed available clinical data to
examine the therapeutic potential of marijuana in neuropathic
pain, in movement disorders, and several other areas of
neurotherapeutics (Wright, 2007). The review’s aim was to discuss
the clinical evidence investigating the use of medicines derived,
directly or indirectly, from plant cannabinoids with special
reference to neurological disorders (Wright, 2007). Published
studies suggested that the oral administration of marijuana may
not be the preferred route of administration and that plant
extracts (i.e., Sativex®) show greater efficacy than synthetic
compounds (Wright, 2007).
According to Wright (2007), there are two cannabinoids
present in great quantities in marijuana plant extracts; THC and
CBD (cannabidiol) (Wright, 2007). CBD has been shown to have
antipsychotic in animal models, to show antipsychotic efficacy in
humans, to reduce THC-induced anxiety, to modulate THC-induced
postsleep cognitive impairment, and to have anxiolytic effects,
which may be mediated by effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-
DRUG ABUSE 17
adrenal axis (Wright, 2007). As a whole, these findings present
good evidence for the meaningful therapeutic effect of marijuana,
especially with equal proportions of CBD and THC administered by
the sublingual route, as in Sativex® (Wright, 2007).
Concluding Discussion
Current issues in addiction research suggest that marijuana
addiction is psychologically-complex, that it is a disturbance of
decision making, that it is not limited to drugs, and that it
involves many transmitters (Pinel, 2011). This is evidenced by
the fact that addiction is currently defined as a chronic
relapsing brain disease expressed in the form of compulsive
behaviors (National Institute of Drug Abuse [NIDA], 2011). With
over 29 million drug users in 2010 (11.5%), marijuana is one of
the most commonly-abused and popular illicit drugs in the United
States. Yet, its addiction potential is low (10%) and its
withdrawal symptoms are rare, short-term, and mild. Why is this?
Is it because marijuana is not an addictive drug? The current
issues in addiction research suggest that the addiction
mistakenly attributed to marijuana is psychologically-complex,
DRUG ABUSE 18
involves many transmitters, and is not limited to the drug, but
rather to the reward circuits of the brain (Pinel, 2011).
Although it was once thought that marijuana causes brain
damage, almost all efforts to document brain damage from
marijuana use have proven to be negative and difficult to
directly-document; mostly because the effects of marijuana are
subtle, difficult to measure, and greatly influenced by the
social situation (Pinel, 2011). Scientists now know that, like
all addictions, there are three factors that trigger relapse in
abstinent marijuana users: priming doses of the drug, drug
associated cues, and stress; the prefrontal cortex mediates
priming-induced relapse, the amygdala mediates conditional cue-
induced relapse, and the hypothalamus mediates stress-induced
(Pinel, 2011). What this demonstrates is that the very areas that
are affected by marijuana use are also the areas implicated in
triggering relapse in marijuana users who are trying to quit.
Users attempting to quit should avoid stressful social
situations, as well as the priming doses and cues (i.e., one
‘hit’, ‘contact high’, marijuana’s odor, friends, parties)
associated with marijuana use and abuse. This suggests that
DRUG ABUSE 19
additional research is required to determine the causal factors
involved in marijuana’s correlations and that the therapeutic
role of cannabinoids should be the focus of research for many
years to come.
DRUG ABUSE 20
References
Filbey, F., Schacht, J., Myers, U., Chavez, R., & Hutchison, K.
(2010). Individual and additive effects of the CNR1 and FAAH
genes on brain response to marijuana cues.
Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(4), 967-75. Retrieved from
ProQuest Health and Medical Complete. (Document ID:
1958614611).
Gómez-Ruiz, M., Hernández, M., de Miguel, R., & Ramos, J. (2007).
An overview on the biochemistry of the cannabinoid system.
Molecular Neurobiology, 36(1), 3-14. Retrieved from ProQuest
Health and Medical Complete. (Document ID: 1940235531).
Kavia, R., De Ridder, D., Constantinescu, C., Stott, C., &
Fowler, C. (2010). Randomized controlled trial of Sativex to
treat detrusor overactivity in multiple sclerosis. Multiple
Sclerosis, 16(11), 1349-59. Retrieved from ProQuest Health
and Medical Complete. (Document ID: 2178085631).
DRUG ABUSE 21
Lee, M., & Hancox, R. (2011). Effects of smoking cannabis on lung
function. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine, 5(4), 537-547.
Retrieved from ProQuest Health and Medical Complete.
(Document ID: 2440050591).
Moore, T. H., Zammit, S., Lingford-Hughes, A., et al. (2007).
Cannibis use and risk of psychotic or affective mental
health outcomes: A systemic review. Lancet, 370(9584), 319-
328.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2011). Marijuana.
Retrieved from
http://www.drugabuse.gov/DrugPages/Marijuana.html
Pinel, J. (2011). Biopsychology (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Smith, A., Longo, C., Fried, P., Hogan, M., & Cameron, I. (2010).
Effects of marijuana on visuospatial working memory: an fMRI
study in young adults. Psychopharmacology, 210(3), 429-38.
Retrieved from ProQuest Health and Medical Complete.
(Document ID: 2038749811).
Wright, S. (2007). Cannabinoid-based medicines for neurological
disorders--Clinical evidence. Molecular Neurobiology, 36(1),