U U City Council A2enda Tuesday, July 6, 2010 - Des Plaines

CITY OF

U Ur-Ji

DES PLAINES]‘sILLOI/

City Council A2enda

Tuesday, July 6, 2010Executive Session — 6:30 p.m.

Regular Session — 7:00 p.m.

Room 102

CALL TO ORDER

EXECUTIVE SESSION (to be sent under separate cover)PERSONNEL

REGULAR SESSIONROLL CALLPRAYERPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

PRESENTATIONMARINE CORPS LEAGUE PRESENTATION TOMAYOR MOYLAN AND ROBERT PROVENZANO

CITIZEN PARTICIPATION(matters not on the Agenda)

ALDERMEN ANNOUNCEMENTS

EXECUTIVE SESSION ACTIONPERSONNEL (IF REPORTED OUT)

DRAFT: 6/29/201() 12:14PM

Tuesday. July 6, 2010 City of Des Plaines City Council Agenda P a g e I 2

CONSENT AGENDA:1. Minutes/Regular Meeting — June 21, 2010

2. Minutes/Executive Session —June21, 2010

3. Change of Ownership and Classification for Taqueria Los Amigos Dc Apatzingan, Inc., d/b/a Los Amigos,967 /2 S. Elinhurst Rd., Des Plaines, IL 60016 - Add one (1) Class A Tavern Liquor Dealers License andRemove one (I) Class E Restaurant Liquor Dealers License for Los Amigos

3a. ORDINANCE M-27-10/Change of Liquor License Ownership and Classification for Taqucria Los Amigos

4. Approve Conditional Use Permit fur a Money Transfer (Currency Exchange) Operation at 1108 Lee Street4a. ORDINANCE Z-14-l0/Conditional Use for 1108 Lee Street

5. Authorize Payment to Jack’s Tents fur Special Events Tent Rental Fee5a. RESOLUTION R-92- 10/Payment of Special Events Tent Rental

6. Authorize Gasvoda & Associates, the regional factory authorized repair facility for KSB, to repair andreinstall O’Hare Lake Pumping Station Pump 3 in the amount of $29,350.00. FEMA to reimburse City for75% of costs and remainder source of funding would be the Water/Sewer Fund.

6a. RESOLUTION R-93-10/O’Hare Lake Pumping Station Pump 3 Repairs

7. Accept Bid Award through the Northwest Municipal Conference Suburban Purchasing Cooperative for StreetLane Marking from Superior Road Striping Inc., 1967 Cornell Court, Melrose Park, Illinois 60160 to befunded from budgeted Motor Fuel Tax funds not to exceed $30,000.

7a. RESOLUTION R-94-l0/Strect Lane Marking Bid Award

8. Award Bid for Refurbishment of Police Department Shooting Range to Patriot Range Technologies, 7928 S.Madison Street, Burr Ridge, Illinois in an amount not to exceed $253,707.50 — funded from Asset ForfeitureFunds

8a. RESOLUTION R-95-lO/Refurbishment of Police Department Shooting Range Bid Award

9. Award Bid for Crack Sealing to the lowest bidder, North Suburban Asphalt Maintenance, P.O. Box 497, ParkRidge, IL 60068 at a unit price per pound of$l .08. Budgeted MFT Funds of $25,000.

9a. RESOLUTION R-71-10/Crack Sealing Bid Award

10. Approve Contract Amendment to Current Street and Utility Improvements Contract with Arrow RoadConstruction, 3401 South Busse Road, P.O. Box 334, Mount Prospect, IL in the amount of $100,000. Alsorecommended is an addition to the 414F Capital Maintenance Supplies Account in the amount of $50,000 forStreet Patching Material/Source of Funding — Capital Projects Fund

lOa, RESOLUTION R-97-lO/Contract Amendment to Current Street & Utility Improvements Contract

11. SECOND READING — ORDINANCE M-26- 1 0/Foreign Fire Tax Board Amendment

12. SECOND READING — ORDINANCE Z-l3-10/Zoning Map Amendment/S 15 E. Thacker Street

END OF CONSENT AGENDA

Tuesday, July 6, 2010 City of Des Plaines City Council Agenda P a g e I 3

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

1. FfNANCE & ADMINISTRATION Alderman Jean Higgason, Chaira. Warrant Register in the amount of $2,671,980.04— RESOLUTION R-96-10

2. COMMU1ITY DEVELOPMENT - Aldennan Rosemary Argus, Chaira. Conditional Use Permit for 480 Potter/Islamic Center Parking Lot Expansion — ORDINANCE Z- 15-10b. Conditional Use Permit and Variance for 1 855 East OaktonlAuto Sales —

Bully Auto — ORDINANCE Z-16-10c. Conditional Use Permit for 1141 Lee Street — ORDINANCE Z-17-i0d. Overlay District for Electronic Signage — Mannheim Road

IF NO ACTION IS TAKEN UNDER NEW BUSINESS. THESE ITEMS WILL APPEAR ON THE JULY 19.2010 CONSENT AGENDA OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO TAKE ACTION ONANY OF THESE ITEMS THIS EVENING, THEY MUST BE REPORTED OUT BY THE COMMITTEECHAIRMAN UNDER “NEW BUSINESS”

UNFINISHED BUSINESS1. Contract Extension — Holiday Lighting and Decorations/RESOLUTION R-72-10

NEW BUSINESS: IF REPORTED OUT BY COMMITTEEI. a. RESOLUTION R-96-l0/Warrant Register in the amount of $2,671,980.042. a. ORDINANCE Z-15-10/Conditional Use Permit for 480 Potter/Islamic Center Parking Lot Expansion

b. ORDINANCE Z- 16-1 0/Conditional Use Permit and Variance for 1855 E. Oakton/Auto Sales at Bully Autoc. ORDINANCE Z-17-10/Conditional Use Permit for 1141 Lee Streetd. Overlay District for Electronic Signage — Mannheim Road

MANAGER’S REPORT

ALDERMEN COMMENTS

MAYORAL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

City of Des Plaines, in compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who requirecertain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in the meeting(s) or have questions about the accessibility of thenieeting(s) or facilities, contact the ADA Coordinator at 391-5486 to allow the City to make reasonable accommodations for thesepersons.

NOILVLLN1ISE[)1J

1

.rTv OF

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR%S.1fl jJ Cii’,’ of Des Plaines

DES PLAINES 1420 Miner StreetILLINOIS Des Plaines, Illinois 60016

Telephone: 847/391 5301Martin J. Moylan Fax: 847/391-5378

CITY OF DES PLAINES

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR

DATE: June 29, 2010

TO: Honorable Aldermen

FROM Martin J. MoylanMayor

RE: Presentation

************************************************************************

At the beginning of the July 6, 2010 City Council meeting, Robert Sturlini and DaveMurphy of the Northwest Suburban Detachment of the Marine Corps League will hepresent to award certificates of appreciation to the Mayor, City Council and HighwayCommissioner Robert Provenzano for their efforts in the dedication and preservation ofthe Belleau Wood Memorial.

NORTHWEST SUBURBAN DETACH MET/1AIUE CORPS LEAGUE

CHARTERED BY ACT OF CONGRESS

* “Once a Marine, Always a Niarine”

Mayor Martin J. Moylan June 21, 2010City of Des Plaines1420 Miner StDes Plaines, IL. 60016

Dear Mayor Moylan,

The Northwest Suburban Detachment of the Marine Corps League is lookingforward to presenting you, the City of Des Plaines, and Maine TownshipHighway Commissioner Robert Provenzano Certificates of Appreciation foryour efforts in the dedication and preservation of the Belleau Wood Memorialat the July 6th 2010 City Council Meeting. My understanding is thepresentation will be made at the start of the Council Meeting and will notinterfere with city business.

Sincerely, -

Robert E. Sturlini Sr.Northwest Suburban DetachmentMarine Corps League2702 Dove StRolling Meadows, IL 60008847-259-1730

V‘ -

Consent Agenda Item #1MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITYCOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DES PLAINES, ILLINOISHELD IN THE ELEANOR ROHRBACH MEMORIALCOUNCIL CHAMBERS, DES PLAINES CIVIC CENTER,MONDAY, JUNE 21, 2010

CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the City Council of the Cityof Des Plaines, Illinois, was called to order byMayor Martin J. Moylan at 6:15 p.m. in the EleanorRohrbach Memorial Council Chambers, Des Plaines CivicCenter on Monday, June 21, 2010.

ROLL CALL: Roll call indicated the following aldermen present:Haugeberg, Robinson, Bogusz, Higgason, Brookman,Waisten, Wilson, Argus. Alderman Brookman wasabsent.

Also present were: Acting City Manager Slowinski, Assistant Directorof Finance Bromber, Police Chief Prandini, Fire Chief Wax, Directorof Public Works & Engineering Oakley, Director of Community &Economic Development Conlan, Director of Information TechnologyDuebner, Director of Human Resources Earl and City Attorney Wiltse.EXECUTIVE Moved by Robinson, seconded by Higgason, to go intoSESSION: Executive Session to discuss Probable & ImminentLitigation. Upon roll call, the vote was:AYES: 8—Haugeberg, Robinson, Bogusz, Higgason,Brookman, Waisten, Wilson, ArgusNAYS: 0-None

ABSENT: 0—NoneMotion declared carried.

The City Council recessed at 6:16 p.m.

The City Council reconvened at 7:25 p.m.

Roll call indicated the following aldermen present:Haugeberg, Robinson, Rogusz, Higgason, Brookman,Waisten, Wilson, Argus.

PRAYER AND The opening prayer was given by Rev. John Clemons ofPLEDGE: Our Lady of Hope Catholic Church, followed by thePledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

WELCOME: Mayor Moylan welcomed the students lrom Maine WestHigh School who are participating in the City’sClinical Government Program, which is now in its 35°year.

6/21/10

PAGE TWO

PRESENTATION: Mayor Moylan introduced Christy Piskiewicz of the Des

Plaines Arts Council who recognized the following

2010 scholarship recipients:

Mariah Berry, Maine West High School

Janice Kulka, Maine West High School

Kathryn Malone, Maine West High School

Eduardo Marquez, Maine West High School

Angela Remus, Maine West High School

Arthur Stashak, Canada’s National Ballet School

Caitlin Cadwalder, Friendship Junior High

Anna Holubecki, Chippewa Middle School

Hannah Kuhn, Algonquin Middle School

Kathryn Moro, Iroquois Community School

Sage Shanahan, South Elementary School.

CONSENT Moved by Higgasori, seconded by Robinson, to establish

AGENDA: a Consent Agenda. Motion declared carried.

Moved by Haugeberg, seconded by Brookman, to approve

the Consent Agenda. Upon roll call, the vote was:

AYES: 8-F-Iaugeberg, Robinson, Bogusz, Higgasori,

Brookmari, Walsten, Wilson, Argus

NAYS: 0-None

ABSENT: 0-None

Motion declared carried.

The minutes were approved; Staff recommendations and

requests were approved; Ordinance M-26-10 was placed

on First Reading; Ordinance M-25-l0 was adopted; and

Resolutions R—84—lO, R—85—lO, R—86—10, R—87—l0, R—89—

10 and R-91-l0 were adopted.

MINUTES: Moved by Haugeherg, seconded by Brookman, to approve

Consent minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council

Agenda held June 7, 2010. Motion declared carried as

approved unanimously under Consent Agenda.

FOREIGN FIRE Moved by Hauqeberg, seconded by Rrookman, to concur

TAX BOARD with Staff recommendation to amend Title 2, “Boards

ANDNT: and Commissions”, Chapter 10 “Dc Plaines Foreign

Consent Fire Insurance Tax Board” to comply with the

Agenda provision of Public Acts 95-807 and 96—505; arid

further recommend to place on First Reading Ordinance

Ordinance M-26-10, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 2, “BOARDS AND

M—26—1O COMMISSIONS,” CHAPTER 10, “DES PLAINES FOREIGN FIRE

INSURANCE TAX BOARD” OF THE DES PLAINES CITY CODE.

Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under

Consent Agenda.

‘\,1

6/21/ 10

PAGE THREE

RIVER ROAD Moved by [-{augeberg, seconded by Brookman, to concur

RECONSTR: with Staff recommendation to accept proposal from URS

Consent Corporation, 100 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500,

Agenda Chicago, IL 60606, in the not to exceed amount of

$1,121,444.95 for construction engineering services

Resolution on the Des Plaines River Road Reconstruction Project/

R-84—1O source of funding the City’s $17,473.10 portion of

the fees is the Capital Projects Fund; and further

recommend to adopt Resolution R-84-10, A RESOLUTION

AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROPOSAL FROM URS

CORPORATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR

THE DES PLAINES RIVER ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN

AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,121,444.95. Motion

declared carried as approved unanimously under

Consent Agenda.

FIRE HYDRANTS Moved by Haugeberg, seconded by Brookman, to concur

PURCHASE: with Staff recommendation that in the best interest

Consent of the City, the City Council waive normal bidding

Agenda procedures and accept the quote for replacement fire

hydrants on an “as needed basis” from HD Supply, 220

Resolution S. Westgate Drive, Carol Stream, IL 60188, in the

R—85--1O total amount of $42,300/Water—Sewer Funds; and

further recommend to adopt Resolution R—85-i0, A

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF MUELLER FIRE

HYDRANTS ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS FROM HD SUPPLY

WATERWORKS, LTD. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED

$42,300.00. Motion declared carried as approved

unanimously under Consent Agenda.

BID AWAD/ Moved by Haugeberg, seconded by Brookman, to concur

LIBRARY DECK with Staff recommendation to award bid for Library

CAULKING: Parking Deck Caulking to Architectural Sealants,

Consent Inc., 9232 Gulfstream Road, Unit B, Frankfort, IL

Agenda 60423, for the unit prices provided in the not to

exceed amount of $85,000.00/TIP #1—Downtown Cost

Resolution Center, arid further recommend to adopt Resolution R—

R-86-lO 86-10, A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE BID FROM

ARCHITECTURAL SEALANTS, INC. FOR CAULKING THE LIBRARY

PARKING DECK IN A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED

$85,000.00. Motion declared carried as approved

unanimously under Consent Agenda.

6/21/10PAGE FOUR

WATER TANK Moved by Haugeberg, seconded by Brookman, to concurVALVE with Staff recommendation in the best interest of theREPLACENT City to waive the normal bidding procedures andPURCHASE: accept proposal for replacing the Oakton StreetConsent Elevated Water Tank altitude valve from MartamAgenda Construction, 1200 Gasket Drive, Elgin, IL 60120, inthe not to exceed amount of $16,695.00/Water-SewerResolution Funds, and further recommend to adopt Resolution RR-87--1O 87-10, A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL FROMMARTAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED FOR THE EMERGENCYREPLACEMENT OF THE ALTITUDE CONTROL VALVE ON THEOAKTON STREET WATER TANK. Motion declared carried asapproved unanimously under Consent Agenda.

NEXTEL LEASE Moved by Haugeberg, seconded by Brookman, to concurAGR./1402 with Staff recommendation to authorize execution ofHOWABD: Amendment No. 1 to Lease Agreement between NextelConsent West Corporation and the City of Des Plaines in orderAgenda that Nextel may perform all work necessary toprepare, maintain and alter the site to install,Resolution modify or otherwise relocate the Facilities locatedR—89—1O on the water tower at 1402 Howard and to increase therent paid therefore; and adopt Resolution R—89-10, ARESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT NO.1 TO LEASE AGREEMENT WITH NEXTEL WEST CORPORATION FORFACILITIES LOCATED ON THE WATER TOWER AT 1402 HOWARDSTREET. Motion declared carried as approvedunanimously under Consent Agenda.

APPOINTNT/ Moved by Haugeberg, seconded by Brookman, to approveREAPPOINT.: Mayoral appointments/reappointments as follows:Consent Appointments:Agenda LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Steven Mokry, term to expire June 30, 2013Dion Hendrick, term to expire June 30, 2013n tmerit:

LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEESSusan Moylan Krey, term to expire June 30, 2013Motion declared carried as approved unanimously underConsent Agenda.

ORDINANCE Moved by Hauqeherg, seconded by Brookinan, to adoptM—25-1O/ Ordinance M-25-l0, AN ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO 820 ILCSPREVAILING 130/1, ET SEW., AS AMENDED, PERTAINING TO WAGES OF’WAGE: EMPLOYEES PERFORMiNG PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION ANDConsent PREVAILING WAGE RATES. Motion declared carried asAgenda approved unanimously under Consent Aqenda.

6/21/10PAGE FIVE

AGREEMENT/OAKTONCOLLEGE /

JULY 4TH:

ConsentAgenda

ResolutionR-91—1O

Moved by Haugeberg, seconded by Brookman, to concurwith Staff recommendation to authorize City Managerand City Clerk to execute “Contract for Use ofFacilities” with Oakton Community College 1600 E.Golf Road, to use the Des Plaines campus for the July4, 2010 Festival and Fireworks; City to provideCertificate of Insurance; and further recommend toadopt Resolution R-9l-l0, A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZINGTHE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DESPLAINES AND OAKTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOR USE OF THEOAKTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE CAMPUS FOR THE 4TH OF JULYEVENT FOR THE YEAR 2010. Motion declared carried asapproved unanimously under Consent Agenda.

MAYOR MOYLAN DECLARED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL WAS NOWRESOLVED INTO A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION - Alderman Higgason, Chair

WARRANT

REGISTER:

ZONING MAPAMEND./515 E.THACKER ST.:

Moved by Haugeberg, seconded b Robinson, torecommend to the City Council approval of the June21, 2010 - Warrant Register, in the total amount of$2,572,558.80; and further recommend that ResolutionR—88-10 he adopted at appropriate time this evening.Motion declared carried.

Director of Community & Economic Development Conlanreviewed Senior Planner Mangum’s memo of June 3,2010; the petitioner, the Des Plaines Park District,is requesting an Amendment to the Official ZoningMap, as amended, to reclassify the property from R—1Single Family Residential Zoning District to the 1—1Institutional Zoning District.

MovedyWals ten, seconded by Robinson, to recommendto the City Council approval of the Zoning MapAmendment at 515 E. Thacker Street to reclassify thepropert:y from R-l Single Family Residential to I—iInstitutional Zoning District; and further recommendthat Ordinance Z—13—l0 be placed on First Reading atappropriate time this evening. Motion declaredcarried.

MAYOR MOYLAN ASSUNED THE CHAIR AND DECLARED THE CITYCOUNCIL BACK IN SESSION.

\_/

6/21/10PAGE SIX

ORD INANCEM— 23—10

LIQ. LIC./1602 S. RIVERROAD:

WARRANT

REGISTER:

Resolution

R—88—10

ZONING MAPAMEND./515 E.THACKER ST.:

OrdinanceZ—13—10

AMENDIdENT/FACADE REHABPROGRAM:

ResolutionR—90—10

Moved by Robinson, seconded by Haugeberg, to TABLEOrdinance M-23--l0, the proposed liquor license at1602 S. River Road, and refer the matter back toStaff to review whether the applicant meets thespecific requirements set forth in the City Code.Motion declared carried.

Moved by Higgason, seconded by Robinson, to concurwith recommendation of Committee of the Whole toadopt Resolution R—88-10, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITYCOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DES PLAINES THAT THE FOLLOWINGBILLS ARE DUE AND PAYABLE AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITYCLERK BE AND ARE HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO MAKE PAYMENTFOR SAME. Total: $2,572,558.80. Upon roll call, thevote was:AYES: 8-Haugeberg, Robinson, Bogusz, Higgason,

Brookman, Waisten, Wilson, ArgusNAYS: 0-NoneABSENT: 0-NoneMotion declared carried.

Moved by Walsten, seconded by Robinson, to concurwith recommendation of Committee of the Whole toapprove Zoning Map Amendment at 515 E. Thacker Streetto reclassify the property from R—l Single FamilyResidential to I—i Institutional Zoning District; andfurther recommend that Ordinance Z-13-lO be placed onFirst Reading, AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A MAP AMENDMENTFROM R-1, SINGLE FAMiLY RESIDENTIAL TO 1—1,INSTITUTIONAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 515 E.THACKER STREET, DES PLAINES, iLLINOIS. (Case #10-014-MAP) . Upon roll call, the vote was:AYES: 8-Haugeheng, Robinson, Bogusz, Higgason,

Brookman, Walsten, Wilson, ArgusNAYS: 0-NoneABSENT: 0-NoneMotion declared carried.

Moved by Haugeberq, seconded by Higgason, to concurwith recommendation or the Economic DevelopmentCommi ssion to amend the guidelines of the FaçadeRehabilitation Program to allow 75% reimbursement ofcosts incurred in the installation of awnings oncommercial buildings within TIE District #1 during2010. Upon roll call, the vote was:AYES: 7—Hauqeherq, Robinson, Bogusz, Higgason,

Brookman, Walsten, WilsonNAYS: 1-ArgusABSENT: 0-NoneMotion declared carried

6/21/ 10PAGE SEVEN

RECONVENE! Moved by Bogusz, seconded by Brookman, to reconveneEXECUTIVE into Executive Session to discuss Probable & ImminentSESSION: Litigation. Upon roll call, the vote was:

AYES: 8-Haugeberg, Robinson, Bogusz, Higgason,Brookman, Waisten, Wilson, Argus

NAYS: 0-NoneABSENT: 0-NoneMotion declared carried.

The City Council recessed at 8:09 p.m.

The City Council reconvened at 9:03 p.m.

Roll call indicated the following aldermen present:Haugeberg, Robinson, Higgason, Brookman, Waisten,Wilson.

ADJOURNNENT: Moved by Walsten, seconded by Robinson, that theregular meeting of the City Council adjourn. Motiondeclared carried. Meeting adjurnedat 9:06 p.m.

,/ (• /

___ ___

nancy Pet,yon — Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED BY ME THIS

DAY OF

____

, 2010

Martin J. Moylan, MAYOR

Consent Agenda Items #3 & 3a—

-TY OF”%

(j\ OFFICE OF THE MAYORU Ii City of Des P/ames

—‘

DES PLAINES) 1420 Miner StreetDes Plaines, Illinois 60016Telephone: 847/391-5301

Martin J. Moylan Fax: 847/391-5378

DATE: June 29, 2010

TO: Honorable Aldermen

FROM: Martin J. MoylanMayor

RE: Taqueria Los Amigos De Apatzingan, Inc. d/b/a Los Amigos,967 S. Elmhurst Rd. Class A Tavern Liquors DealersLicense — Change of Ownership — Change of Classificationfrom Class E Restaurant and Dining Room License

Attached please find an application for a Class A Tavern LiquorDealers License, as well as the Articles of Incorporation and thesignature pages of the lease agreement for the property. The completeapplication is on file in the Mayor’s office.

Fees have been paid, required posting has been done, background checkhas been completed and owners are aware of the Alcohol AwarenessRequirement.

This will come before you on the consent agenda at the City Councilmeeting of July 6, 2010.

Martin J. MoylanMayorLocal Liquor License Control Commissioner

cc: Jason Slowinski, Acting City Manager

Form for Corporations 3-2003

CITY OF DES PLAINESAPPLICATION FOR LICENSE

UNDERDES PLAINES LIQUOR CONTROL ORDINANCE

TO: Liquor Control Commissioner:The undersigned hereby makes application for the issuance of a license to engage in the business of selling alcoholic liquors, as indicated

hereafter.

Applicant’s corporate name ‘ c—i i1 Lo 5 /9Th-t ( bDoing business as:

2. Location of place of business for which license is sought:

(A)c1

- i ST ‘&/ 2 (Exact address by Street and number)

(B) Hours of operation: -

Phone: 5 5O Lj3. Date of incorporation LI —‘L!,

‘ (0 Under laws of State of

____________________________________

(Attach a copy of the most recent State of Illinois Domestic Corporation Annual Report.)

Name f Registered Agent: J’TO N ‘

Address: 3O S R %Z f’ 1. P ti 5Phone Number: 97

(Tavern Liquors Dealers License -- scat 250 people or less)

(Thvern License seat 25 I to 500 people)

(Tavern License — seat more than 500 people)

(Tavern and Bulk Sale on and off premises seat 250 people or less)

(Tavern and Bulk Sale seat 250 to 500 people)

(Tavern and Bulk Sale -- seat over 500 people)

(Bulk Sales Dealers License — No consumption on iwemises)

(Bulk Sales, [.iquor no! primary product)

(Club Liquor License)

(Restaurant and [)ining Room [.icense — seat over 50 people)

(Restaurant. Beer Only)

(Banquet Hall)

(Restaurant, Beer and Wine Only)

(Bulk Sale, Beer and Wine Only)

(Religious Society License)

(Special 4 inn liquor License. - (lass A License Required)

(Government Facility License)

(Wine Only- On and Off Premises)

S. State names of directors and officers, and itidicate the percentage of stock owned in applicant corporation, if any.

(Nine: If more than three directors, attach separate sheet with required in formation for additional directors.)

(A) President _f .0flj --Percentage of stock owned__. 5D _. %

1 hive you ever plead guilty, been t ound guilty, received supervision, plead iiohi contendere (rio contest) to iniy felony under any Federal , State,

(‘ounty or Municipal law ntdmilimiiE:c7%.’ — -

p’p’r1z.”J7’W, J,t(

c 62((

i:L

4. Classification of Licenses being applied for:

l_,u,JeS CL. (oo(;

‘/Class A

Class A-I

_Class A-2

lass AB

_CIass AB-l

Class AB.2

- Class B

(lass B-I

_Class C

_ClassE

Class F

(lassO

Class H--I

.CIass 11-2

Class I

ClassJ

_Class K

(lass L

If Yes, attac Ii add iii ona I sleet ide rim it y i rig cli a rgc , date of fi ml i ig , Couti nam ne and Bra nu Ii a ml case docket in nbc

• Attach a copy of the current Alcohol Awareness Certification.

Do you participate in the operation of the business? . SIf”Yes”,stateindetailthenatureofyourparticipation. ?uLL t2AP-1 IC1 9A’EIO “ ‘CL 1P..J

(Attach Confidential Information Forms)

(B) Vice President t) . L1 & Percentage of stock owned

_______________________

Have you ever plead guilty, been found guilty, received supervision, plead nob contendere (no contest) to any felony under any Federal, State,

County or Municipal law ordinance? J )

If Yes, attach additional sheet identifying charge, date of finding, Court name and Branch and case docket number.

Attach a copy of the current Alcohol Awareness Certification.

Will you participate in the operation of the business? tIf “Yes”, state in detail the nature of your participation. K. t( h n i’) \ y(Attach Confidential Information Forms)

(C) SecretaTy 1- ‘J ) L .. Percentage of stock owned ( 5 M E A

Have you ever plead guilty, been found guilty, received supervision, plead nob contendere (no contest) to any felony under any Federal, State,

County or Municipal law ordinance? f’JDIf Yes, attach additional sheet identifying charge, date of finding, Court name and Branch and case docket number.

Attach a copy of the current Alcohol Awareness Certification./‘

Will you participate in the operation of the business? fJ (14 . SR i”t E i\-5 PrC.) ‘J t

If “Yes”, state in detail the nature of your participation.


6. List below persons or corporations owning 5% or more of the stock of the applicant, other than those named in answer to question 5. State the

percentage of stock so owned.

Percentage of stock owned

__________________________


_________________________


_________________

%


7. Does applicant own premises for which license is sought? %R — —

If not, when does applicant’s lease expire? ‘ 1., C) I — —

8. Is the location of the applicant’s business for which license is sought within one hundred (100) feet of any church, school, hospital, home for

aged or indigent persons or for veterans, their wives or children, or any naval or military station, as defined by ordinance of this City? 0

9. Is any law enforcing official, Mayor, Alderman, Member of a City Commission or Board, or any President or member of a County Board directly

or indirectly interested in the business for which license is sought? J C)

__________________________________________________

If answer is “Yes”, give particulars —

10, Is or will the business be conducted by a Manager or Agent? .0

____________________________________________

If answer is “Yes”, complete attached Manager’s supplemental sheet for each manager.

II,. Has any officer or director of applicant corporation, or any stockholders, owning in this aggregate more than five percent (5%) of the stock of

such corporations, ever plead guilty, received supervision, plead nob contendere (no contest) to any felony under any Federal, State, County or

Municipal law or ordinance?

If Yes, attach additional sheet identifying charge, date of finding, Court name and Branch and case docket number.

12. Has any officer or director of said corporation, or any stockholders owning in the aggregate more than five percent (5%) of the stock of such

corporation, ever plead guilty to or been found guilty of a violation of any Federal, Stale, County or Municipal, liquor laws or ordinance.

If so, give name of person so convicted, court, date of offense and the offense. L) c)

13. Has any officer or director of said corporation, or any stockholders owning in the aggregate more than five percent (5%) of the stock of such

corporation, ever plead guilty to or been found guilty under any Federal, State, County or Municipal law or ordinance of being the keeper of a

house of ill fame; or of pandering or any other crime or misdemeanor opposed to decency or morality? ‘J C)If so, give name of person so convicted, stating date and the offense

_____________________________________________________________________

14. Has the applicant corporation or any Officer, Manager, or Director of said corporation, or any stockholders owning in the aggregate more than

five percent (5%) of the stock of such corporation, made application for a similar license for this period for any premises other than those

described above? 0If so, give name of applicant, location of premises, date and disposition of application

15. Has any license previously issued by Federal, State, or local authorities to the applicant corporation or to any officer, manager, or director of said

corporation, or any stockholder or stock holders owning in the aggregate more than five percent (5%) of the stock of such corporation, been

revoked? 1. 0If so, give name of licensee and state reasons for and date of revocation

______________________________________________________________________

16. List any person identified in this application who is currently certified by any alcohol awareness training program: Attach copies of all

certificatcs._ n .

________________

Complete the supplementary Manager’s form for each person identified above who has not previously answered these questions.

(Attach Confidential Information Forms for Each)

I?. I (We) acknowledge that any change in address, ownership or management must be immediately reported to the city and that the

application must be updated and signed at that time. (Please initial) r Y’

_________

AFFII)AVIT

STATE OF ILL.INOIS COUNTY OF COOK S.S.

The undersigned swear (or affirm) that the corporation in whose name this application is made will not violate any of the ordinances of the City

of Des Plaines or the laws of the State of Illinois or of the United Stait fAnJHc, Ih’the conduct of the place of business described herein

and that the statements contained in this application are true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief. An Alcohol Awareness trained

manager shall he on duty at all times when the business sells alcohol. I further understand and acknowledge that any false statements in this

application may result in the denial of this application, or revocation of any liquor license issued pursuant to this application.

Stihscri bed and sworn to before me this

clay of 2O1Q___

Notary Public SealNotary Public. State of Illinois

issionE*pires7.t!Q1

/ i’llt) (Li —_(1PresideniSignature

f__i ,

C-t’Ct vi_ L/, 4L (JL.tYct(ecretary(} Signature

e&L’

j Notary Public

SUPPLEMENTARY MANAGERS FORM

Will the business be conducted or supervised by a Manager or Agent? ‘si C)If answer is “Yes,” the following questions must be answered by such Agent or Manager:

I. Name____________________________________

2. Have you ever plead guilty to or been found guilty of any felony under the Criminal Code of Illinois?

3. Have you ever plead guilty to or been found guilty of any felony under any Federal, State, County or Municipal law ordinance of being thekeeper of house of ill fame; or of pandering, or of other crime or misdemeanor opposed to decency and morality?If so, give dates and state the offense

______________________________________________________________________________ ___________

4. Nave you ever plead guilty to or been found guilty of a violation of any Federal, State, County or Municipal Liquor law or ordinance since

If so, give dates and state the offense

Have you ever plead guilty, been found guilty, received supervision, plead nob contendere (no contest) to any felony under anyFederal, State, County or Municipal law ordinance?If Yes, attach additional sheet identifying charge, date of finding, Court name and Branch and case docket number.

Has any license previously issued to you by State, Federal or local authorities been revoked?If so, state reasons therefore and date of revocation

7. Attach a copy of the current Alcohol Awareness Certification.

8. Attach Confidential Information Form

I swear (or affirm) that I will not violate any of the ordinances of the City of I)es Plaines or the laws of the State of Illinois or the laws ofthe United States of America, in the conduct of the place of business described herein, and that the statements made by me herein are true andcorrect to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Subscribed and sworn tobefore me)his ,;day of20 /

Noury Pubhc

Signatuir

“OFFICIAL SEAL”CLARA I. RAMIRE?Notary Public, State of lllinosissIoEapjres7.16.2olo

5.

6.

Notary Public Seal

Filing Fee: $150Franchise Tax: $ 25Total: $175

File #: 67469755

Approved By: CLD

FILED

APR 23 2010

Jesse WhiteSecretary of State

1. Corporate Name: TAQUERIA LOS AMIGOS DE APATZINGAN INC.

2. Initial Registered Agent: ANTONIO GARCIAFirst Name Middle Initial Last Name

Initial Registered Office: 301 S RIVER RD APT lBNumber Street Suite No.

DES PLAINES IL 60016-.3419 COOKCity ZIP Code County

3. Purposes for which the Corporation is Organized:The transaction of any or all lawful businesses for which corporations may be incorporated under the Illinois BusinessCorporation Act.

4. Authorized Shares, Issued Shares and Consideration Received:Number of Shares Number of Shares Consideration to be

Class Authorized Proposed to be Issued Received Therefor

COMMON 100 100 $ 100

NAME & ADDRESS OF INCORPORATOR

5. The undersigned incorporator hereby declares, under penalties of perjury, that the statements made in the foregoingArticles of Incorporation are true.

Dated APRIL 23 2010 301 S RIVER RD APT lBMonth & Day Year Street

ANTONIO GARCIA DES PLAINES 60016Name City/Town State ZIP Code

THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE REGISTEREDOFFICE OF THE CORPORATION IS LOCATED, AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 1.10 OF THE BUSINESSCORPORATION ACT OFTHIS STATE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT YOUR COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS OFFICE.

This document was generated electronically at www.cyberdriveillinoiscom

SELLER I SERVER CERTIFiCATIONschool program license #: AlOOltrainee social security #; XXX-XX-XXXXtrainee name: Antonio M Garciaschool name: Learn2Servecertification #: TEMP1001trainee date of birth: 08/08/1969class date: Tuesday, May 4, 2010

I, Albert J. Lillycertify that the above named personsuccessfully completed an approvedLearn2Serve Seller/Server course.

This certification expires 3 (three)years after the date issued unlessotherwise mandated. Refer questionsto 36OTraining at 800-480-3890 orsupport@3óotrai fling.com.

liThis is not an official certificate. It is only proof of completetion.II

IeamlCorporate Headquarters

200 Academy Dr., Ste 260Austin, Texas 78704

tel: 800-480-3890fax:512-441-1811

COMMERCIAL LEASE

955-9671/2 South Elmhurst Road

Des Plaines, Illinois

INDEX PAGE

ARTICLE I BASIC LEASE PROVISIONS 1

ARTICLE II GRANT AND TERM 2-3

ARTICLE III RENT, TAXES, INSURANCE 3-4

ARTICLE IV CONDITION OF PREMISES AND LANDLORD’S ALTERATIONS 4-5

ARTICLE V CONDUCT OF BUSINESS BY TENANT 5

ARTICLE VI OPERATiON OF CONCESSIONS 6

ARTICLE VII SECURITY DEPOSIT 6

ARTICLE VIII PARKING AND COMMON USE AREAS AND FACILITIES 6-7

ARTICLE IX COST AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREAS 7-8

ARTICLE X ALTERATIONS, FIXTURES, SIGNS, AWNiNGS, CANOPIES 8-9

ARTICLE XI MAINTENANCE OF LEASED PREMISES 9-10

ARTICLE XII INSURANCE AND INDEMNI’I’Y 10-11

ARTICLE XIII UTILITIES 11

ARTICLE XIV OFFSET STATEMENT, ATTORNMENT, SUBORDINATION II

ARTICLE XV ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING 11-12

ARTICLE XVI WASTE, GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS 12

ARTICLE XVII ADVERTISING 12

ARTICLE XVIII DESTRUCTION OF LEASED PREMISES 12-13

ARTICLE XIX EMINENT DOMAIN 13

ARTICLE XX DEFAULT OF THE TENANT 13-14

ARTICLE XXI ACCESS BY LANDLORD 14

ARTICLE XXII TENANT’S PROPERTY 15

ARTICLE XXIII HOLDING OVER, SUCCESSORS 15

ARTICLE XXIV MISCELLANEOUS 15-18

REVISED: APRIL21 , 2010

RAY RAYYAN

.üss suffered as a result of any knowing failure of any sale or funding of any loan caused by any misstatement contained in

tter or certificate. Tenant hereby irrevocably appoints Landlord or if Landlord is a trust, Landlord’s beneficiary, as attorney-in

4Its with full power and authority to execute and deliver in the name of Tenant, upon Tenant’s failure to timely do so, such

.ertificate. In addition to any other remedy Landlord may have hereunder, Landlord may, at its option, if Tenant does not deliver to

,rd an estoppel certificate, as set forth above within fifteen (15) days after Tenant is requested to do so, cancel this Lease effective the

day of the then current month, without incurring any liability on account thereof, and the term hereby granted is expressly limited

..cordingly.

SECTION 24.19 OPTION TO EXTEND TERM

IN WiTNESS WI-IEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have signed and sealed this Lease as of the day and year first above written.

TENANT:

LAS AMIGO

Mrs. EvangeWcal Garcia S S #351-02-5516

LANDLORD/OWN ER:CHICAGO TITLE LAND TRUSTEE COMPANY under the

provisions Of aTrust Agreement dated 5/20/88 and known as

Trust #A77105493-01,1

BY:- /

,Ra,y41. Rayyan, Mañáging Piirtnerary

•,:. —• ••-—

Mr. Antonio Garcia S S # # 616 -20- 6519

Page 17

Vjil keep Tenants display windows illuminated and the signs and exterior lights each and every day of the term hereof during

;is designated by Landlord..nt hereby agrees to install and maintain the following cooking protection systems:

(a) All cooking surfaces and appliances must be protected an automatic extinguishing system. The system should protect thefollowing:

(1) All cooking surfaces(2) All exhaust ductwork(3) All hoods(4) All deep fat fryers(5) All other cooking appliances

(b) The extinguishing system must have an easily accessible manual release control.

(c) The Tenant shall furnish to the Landlord the brand name and model of the automatic extinguishing system.

(d) The extinguishing system must have a self-closing automatic fuel cut-off valve that is activated if the extinguishing systemactivates.

(e) The automatic extinguishing system must be inspected at least semi-annually by an independent contractor under contract with thetenant. A copy of said contract shall be furnished to the Landlord and shall be kept current.

(f) The hoods and ductwork must be cleaned at least quarterly by an independent contractor. A copy of said contract shall befurnished to the Landlord and shall be kept current.

(g) Hoods and grease filters must be cleaned at least bi-weekly.

(Ii) Tenant shall furnish the make and model of any installed self-cleaning or grease-extracting system.

(i) Entertainment and dancing shall not be permitted.

In the event any violation of any of the above rules and regulations continues after five (5) days following notice to the Tenant of such violation,beginning on such fifth (5th) day, Tenant shall pay liquidated damages of FIFTY ($50.00) DOLLARS a day for each violation for each daysuch violation continues

tenant understands and has been advised that cetain tenants in the center heve an exciuveto sell cetain food products and tenant agrees to theseexcluive use provisions: pizza.

TENANT:

LAS AMIGO..

Mr. Antonio Garcia S S # 616 -20- 6519

C

______

Mrs. Evangelical Garcia S S # 351 -02- 5516

LANDLORD/OWNER:CHICAGO TITLE LAN[) TRUSTEE COMPANY under theprovisions Of1aTrust Agreernet dated 5/20/88 and known asTrust #A771()5493-Ol

I I

BY:’Ray, I-I. ay’an, Mánging’1’artner and Beneficiary

Page 19

r4 V

4

GUARANTYa

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, and in consideration of, and as inducement for the execution and delivery of the foregoing and attached4se (hereinafter called the ‘Lease”) demising Leased Premises commonly known as 9671/2 South Elmhurst Road, Des Plaines, Illinois

oy CHICAGO TITLE LAND TRUSTEE COMPANY under the provisions Of aTrust Agreement dated 5/20/88 and known asTrust #A77105493-0l, the Landlord therein named (hereinafter called the “Landlord”) to MR Antonio Garcia & Mrs.Evangelical Garciad/b/a LAS AMIGO, the Tenant therein named (hereinafter called the “Tenant”), the MR Antonio Garcia & Mrs.Evangelical Garciaundersigned (hereinafter called the “Guarantor”) hereby guarantees to the Landlord, its successors and assigns, the full and prompt payment ofrent, and any and all other sums and charges payable by the Tenant, it successors and assigns, under said Lease, and further hereby guaranteesthe full and timely performance and observance of all the covenants, terms, conditions and agreements therein provided to be performed andobserved by the Tenant, its successors and assigns; and the Guarantor hereby covenants and agrees to and with the Landlord, its successors andassigns, that if default shall at any time be made by Tenant, its successors and assigns, in the payment of such rent, and any and all other sumsand charges payable by the Tenant, its successors and assigns, under said Lease, or if Tenant should default in the performance and observanceof any of the covenants, terms, conditions or agreements contained in said Lease, the Guarantor will forthwith pay such rent and other suchsums and charges to the Landlord, its successors and assigns, and any arrears thereof, and will forthwith faithfully perform and fulfill all of suchterms, covenants, conditions and agreements, and will forthwith pay to the Landlord all damages that may arise in consequence of any defaultby the Tenant, its successors and assigns, under said Lease, including without limitation, all reasonable attorneys’ fees, disbursements incurredby the Landlord or caused by any such default and/or by the enforcement of this Guaranty.

This Guaranty is an absolute and unconditional guaranty of payment and performance. It shall be enforceable against the Guarantorwithout the necessity of any suit or proceedings on the Landlord’s part of any kind or nature whatsoever against the Tenant, its successors andassigns, and without the necessity of any notice or nonpayment, nonperformance or nonobservance or of any notice of acceptance of thisGuaranty or of any other notice or demand to which the Guarantor might otherwise be entitled, all of which the guarantor hereby expresslywaives; and the Guarantor hereby expressly agrees that the validity of this Guaranty and the obligations of the Guarantor hereunder shall in nowise be terminated, affected, diminished or impaired by reason of the assertion or the failure to assert by the Landlord against the Tenant, oragainst the Tenant’s successors and assigns, of any of the rights or remedies reserved to the Landlord pursuant to the provisions of the saidLease or by relief of Tenant from any of Tenant’s obligations under this Lease or otherwise (including, but not by way of limitation, therejection of said Lease in connection with proceedings under the bankruptcy laws now or hereafter in effect).

This Guaranty shall be a continuing guaranty and the liability of the Guarantor hereunder shall in no way be affected, modified ordiminished by reason of any assignment, renewal, modification or extension of the Lease or by reason of any modification or waiver of orchange in any of the terms, covenants, conditions or provisions of said Lease, or by reason of any extension of time that may be granted by theLandlord to the Tenant, its successors or assigns or a changed or different use of the Leased Premises consented to in writing by Landlord, or byreason of any dealings or transactions or matters or things occurring between the Landlord and the Tenant, its successors or assigns, whether ornot notice thereof is given to the Guarantor.

The Landlord’s consent to any assignment or assignments, and successive assignments by the Tenant and Tenant’s assigns of the Leasemade either with or without notice to the Guarantor shall in no manner whatsoever release the Guarantor from any liability as Guarantor.

The assignment by Landlord of the Lease and/or the avails and proceeds thereof made either with or without notice to the Guarantorshall in no manner whatsoever release the Guarantor from any liability as Guarantor.

All of the Landlord’s rights and remedies under the said Lease or under this Guaranty are intended to be distinct, separate andcumulative and no such right and remedy therein or herein mentioned is intended to be in exclusion of or a waiver of any of the others.

Mr. Antonio Garcia S S # 616-20- 6519

Mrs. Evangelical Garcia S S # 351 -02- 5516

Page 20

CITY OF DES PLAINES

ORDINANCE M - 27 - 10

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 4, “BUSINESSREGULATIONS,” CHAPTER 4, “INTOXICATINGLIQUORS,” SECTION 5, “LICENSE FEES ANDNUMBER,” OF THE DES PLAINES CITY CODE TODELETE ONE CLASS E LIQUOR LICENSE ANDADD ONE CLASS A LIQUOR LICENSE FORTAQUERIA LOS AMIGOS DE APATZINGAN, iNC.,D/B/A LOS AMIGOS LOCATED AT 967 ‘A SOUTHELMHURST ROAD, DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS.

BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook

County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows:

SECTION 1: That Title 4, “Business Regulations,” Chapter 4, “Intoxicating

Liquors,” Section 5, “License Fees and Number,” of the City Code of Des Plaines, be

amended and read as follows:

4-4-5: LICENSE FEES AND NUMBER:

A. Schedule Of Fees, Number Of Licenses Authorized To Be Issued:

Class Number Initial AnnualIssued Fee Fee

Class A

________

I $3,850.00 rsi,925.ool

IClass A-i

________

I 4,840.001 2,420.001

Class A-2 2 6,050.0011 3,025.001

Class AB II 7,480.001 L 3,740.001

IClass AB-l I_______ I 8,470.001 I 4,235.001

IC1ass AB-2 j I 1 9,680.001 4,840.001

Class B 19 3,630.00 1,8 15.00Class B-i II

__________ __________

Class C’ 2 II 1,210.0011 605.00

Class D per 28.00day

_______ __________________ _____

Class F II L3,630.OOlI 1,815.001

Class F I II 2,860.0011 1,430.001

IClass G 3 I 3,630.0011 1,815.001

Class H 3,630.00Class H-i 7Class H-2 7

___________

IClass I 1 II 600.001

Class .i I [ 4 II 3,630.001

IClassK II 1 IClass K-subsidiary

Per event

IClass L II $2,860.00 I 1,430.001

LClass M L_L_i I $3,630.00I L.i5.ool

B. No change

C. No change

SECTION 2: That Taqueria Los Amigos Dc Apatzingan, Inc., d/b/a Los Amigos

located at 967 1/2 South Elmhurst Road is hereby granted a Class A Liquor License in the

City of Des Plaines in conjunction with the change of ownership.

SECTION 3: That one Class E Liquor License shall be deleted.

SECTION 4: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after

its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form according to law.

PASSED this

____

day of , 2010.

APPROVED this day of

_______

, 2010.

VOTE: AYES NAYS ABSENT

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

Published in pamphlet form thisdayof ,2010.

CITY CLERK

Approved as to form:

4Q, 21David R. Wiltse, City Attorney

NOTE: New language is underlined.

Lcgal\Ord\Special\Liq Lic\Los Amigos Change Class E to Class A

3

Consent Agenda Items #4 & 4a

ty of Des PhuinesCo?nmunity & Economic I)e’elopnient DepartmentIO(j

Division ofPlanning & ZoningDES PLANES 1420 Miner StreetILLINOIS

Des Plaines, IL 60016Tel: 847-391-5306Fax: 847-391-2196

STAFF REPORT

Date: June 1, 2010

To: Jason Slowinski, Acting Ci anagerMichael Conhm, INrecto of ommunuly & Economic DeveIopment’ ‘-‘

From: Scott Mangum, Senior Planner, Comnwnity & Economic Development Department

Subj: Conditional Use Permit for operation of a money transfer (Currency Exchange.)operation, 1108 Lee Street, Case # 10-012-CU

cc: PetitionerCase File

Issue: The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use Permit under Section 7.3-6-C of the 1998Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to authorize the operation of a money transfer(Currency Exchange) operation in the C-3 District.

Analysis:Proposed Use Money Transfer, in addition to existing Auto Parts and Cellular

Phone Sales

Petitioner Leon Levikov, 1108 Lee Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016

Owner Wald Management, 2052 W. Irving Park, Chicago, IL 60618

Plan of Operation Operate a money transfer (Currency Exchange) operation with twoemployees Monday-Friday: 8:00 am to 6:00 pm, Saturday 8:00 amto 4:00 pm.

Existing Use Auto Parts and Cellular Phone Sales

Surrounding Land Use North: Commercial RetailEast: Commercial Retail, Restaurant, Auto UsesSouth: Commercial Retail

o15West: Single-Family Residential

Kxisting Zoning C-3, General Commercial

Surrounding Zoning North: C -3, General CommercialEast: C-3, General CommercialSouth: C-3, General CommercialWest: R-1, Single Family Residential

Street Classification Lee Street is an Arterial Street.

Comprehensive Plan The Plan recommends a Community Commercial use for this site.

The applicant, Leon Levikov for San Diego Discount Mall, Inc., has requested a Conditional UsePermit to operate a money transfer (Currency Exchange) business at 1108 Lee Street. Theexisting one-story, five-tenant, approximately 18,030 SF building is located on a lot with a totalarea of approximately 45,750 square feet. The applicant would opel-ate a money transfer businesswithin an approximately 4,660 square foot tenant space where an existing automotive parts andcellular phone business would continue to operate. The applicait states the money transferbusiness would utilize the Uniclos Financial Services. According to Unidos, consumers directlysend funds from agent locations in the United States to a Unidos VISA Prepaid Debit Cardpicked up from a convenient location abroad.

Approximately 52 shared parking spaces are located on site in the front and to the side of thecommercial building. The petitioner has requested a waiver of the traffic study. Due to the natureof this request, staff has agreed to waive the traffic study.

Conditional Use Findings: As required by Section 34-5 (Standards for Conditional Uses) of theZoning Ordinance, the proposed development is reviewed below:

A. The proposed conditional use is in fact a conditional use established within the specificZoning district involved:

Comment: A Currency Exchange is a conditional use in C-3, General Commercial ZoningDistrict, as specified in Section 7.3 of the 1998 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, asamended.

B. The proposed conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the City’sComprehensive Plan;

comment: The 2007 Comprehensive Plan recommends a Community Commercial use for thissite.

of 5C. The proposed conditional use is designed, constructed, operated and maintained to beharmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of thegeneral vicinity;

Comment: The proposed Currency Exchange is located within an existing one-story multi-tenantretail building that fronts on Lee Street, an arterial street that currently has an auto—orientedcharacter in the area near Algonquin Road. No exterior modifications to the building areproposed

ft The proposed conditional use is not hazardous or disturbing to existing neighboringuses;

Comnient: None of the functions of the Currency Exchange are anticipated to be hazardous ordisturbing to the surrounding neighborhood.

E. The proposed conditional use is to be served adequately by essential public facilities andservices, such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refusedisposal, water and sewer, and schools; or, agencies responsible for establishing theconditional use shall provide adequately any such services;

Z’omment. After reviewing the petitioner’s plans, the proposed conditional use would be servedadequately by essential public facilities and would not overburden existing public services.

F. The proposed conditional use does not create excessive additional requirements atpublic expense for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economicwell-being of the entire community;

Comment: The proposed conditional use would appear to have adequate public facilities; itwould not create a burden on public facilities nor would it be a detriment to the economic wellbeing of the community.

G. The proposed conditional use does not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, orthe general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke fumes, glareor odors;

comment: The proposed Currency Exhange is not anticipated to create a large amount ofadditional traffic or noise that could be detrimental to surrounding land uses.

H. The proposed conditional use provides vehicular access to the property designed so thatit does not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares;

of 5Comment: The proposed project would USC the existing curb cuts on Lee Street to access theparking areas. Lee Street is an arterial road built with sufficient capacity to handle the lowvolume ol automobiles generated by the Currency Exchange use.

I. The proposed conditional use does not result in the destruction, loss, or damage ofnatural, scenic, or historic features of major importance;

Comment: The proposed Currency Exchange operation would be located within an existingcommercial building. The proposed plan would not cause the destruction, loss, or damage of anynatural, scenic or historic features of major importance.

J. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional regulations in the ZoningOrdinance specific to the conditional use requested;

Comment: It appears that the proposed use complies with all additional Zoning Regulations.

Recommendations: The Community Development Department recommends approval of theconditional use permit request for a money transfer (Currency Exchange) operation, based onreview of the information presented by the applicant and the findings made above, as specified inSection 3.4-5 (Standards for Conditional Uses) of the City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance.

At its May 25, 2010 meeting, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended (6-0) that the CityCouncil approve, the above-mentioned conditional use permit for a money transfer (CurrencyExchange) operation with the ability to cash checks in the C-3 zoning district, subject toConditions of Approval. Under Section 3.4-4-C of the Zoning Ordinance (Conditional Uses) theCity Council has the authority to approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny the above-mentioned conditional use permit.

Staff requests that this item be placed on the consent agenda at the July 6, 2010 City Councilmeeting

SMIsm

Attachments:

Attachment 1: Petitioner’s Conditional Use and Variation Applications

Attachment 2: Location Map

Attachment 3: Site and Context Photos

Attachment 4: Plan of Operation

Attachment 5: Draft Minutes of the May 25, 2010 Zoning Board of Appeals Hearing

Attachment 6: Letter from Zoning Board of Appeals to the Mayor

Pagc5of5

Exhibits:

Ordinance authorizing a Conditional Use Permit to allow a money transfer operation (CunencyExchange) with the ability to cash checks at 1108 Lee Street.

WI Exhibit A: Plat of Survey prepared by Jon P. Ticc, and datcd November 16, 1993.

[iti (O I

!:CONt)ITIONAI USE APPLICAI ION

DO NOT WRITE 1P4 ThIS AREA — FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

CASENU]fBER I)ATEI?llED \L)Address of Conditioi)a) L)se:

________________

Des Ph)incn 1L.Ol)Fee P$d/R.cecipt Number: Amount: Dale:

_____

P1)Fs are being: []Sutnnktedou a CD.-R.OM OR Q i3-muiled to the Project ManagerPmeet Mnnagcr:

_________

Legal Ncitioc Publication Date; -, pthlihed in ihn: Jourmil Topion

Scbedued heaiing date: L2at 7:30 P.M. in Room 102, City HaltAction by Zoning Adminintralorlzoning Beard of Appeals/City Counit:

-

w-

—hr

—

— —r ——

A Conditinl Use in requested. in accordance with the City of Dea Plumes Zoning OrdLnanceSectcrn(s) as amended, to allow the;

. ;z*.on the property described by the attached legal description.

Appheant(n) Name_____-

Tdephgne:)7_I5622Z Pac; (47- 8f3 qyMailing Address: //OJ Lee

.(/)r/%dc /1 6ZYi

— — _r.a-.

— ii.!- -r

Pivperty Ownerv) Name: —, V— -.

Tekphone 773 7cZ2 Faic: -

MaflingAddreaa:2O, L). /1(V ‘($ fC1 O6/9—

- -d’- - ‘.—. —

-

-- --

04 1/Vi’,) 10:33 FAX 1 773 029 7001

95O43 FPOti:N , T flUTDMOTP’F

Va1 (I Management Co., Inc.

19’1Thi3C44 TO: tT(39237PJl3l P. 1:

A!tachment

jo. J3 i. ii ; UZ TUO1 Va1d Management o., ftc.

PR U1 U O: SUR FROM N I 1UT1]HOTIV iB47Ri3624 TU: 1 flqCr(U1 -. - -- P 2

STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES

The Zon3ng Board of Appeals and the City Council re’iew the prtioular fects and circunuitanccsof each proposed Conditional Use in iems of the following standards. flecause of this pleaseanswer at) questions in detail. “Yes” and “No” answers will not be accepted. And Ifused, maydelay yonr hcrn-ing.

A. La the propoBed eonthtional use, in fact, a conditiorrnt use catablished wii.hin. thespecific zoning district irwolved? (Please eptaha ha detail)

B. Is the proposed conditional use is an accordance with the objoctivcs of the City’sComprehensive Plan and this Ordinance? (Pleaae eiplaIn ha dctafl)

C. Is the proposed conditional usc designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so asto be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intendedcharactcr of the general vicinity? (Please explaw In detail)

I). Is the proposed cnditionaI use is not hazardous or disturbing to existing neighboringuses? (Please explain ha detail)

01 ) 2.2010 .10 33 FAX 1 773 029 7001 Wid Mnngornent: Co. Inc. Ej 0033PR- 9:1fl FFflM:II I flU1OMflTIUE 1t3Th1.3644 1O1?T392S?1 P.3

3. Does tIo proposed conditional tine comply with all additional regulations in thisOrdinance specific to the conditional use requested? Pleawe explain in detail)

LD

1 hereby certify that all of the above statements and those contained in any papers or planssubmitted herewith are true to thc best of my knowledge and belief. Ftuthennore, I consent to theentry in or upon the premises described in the application, by any authorized official of the Cityof Des Plaines, for the purpose ofposting; inaintainmg, and reniovin public hearing notices asmay be required, nnd as well as, conducting site analysis.

(ignattwe of Applicant or Authorized Agent) (Date)

—

_____

(Signature of C°(Date)

Attachment 2, Location Map - 1108 Lee Street

k

G)0)I-.

4..

Cl)C)0)-J

I,I rI,,

IF—

C%J

CQ.

AL.

4aS”rr4.

________

Prepared by Community and Economic Dev&opment Department: SM, May 18, 2010

j.1

Att

achm

ent

3

orn

ori

wr

1108

Lee

Str

eet

1108

Lee

Str

eet

1108

Lee

Str

eet

1108

Lee

Str

eet

—M

oney

Trnfr

Pnb

-

SAN I)I[G() DISCOUNT MALL

1108 1 ,ee StreetDes Plaines

IL 60016

Plan of operation:

Mn—I’r 8—6Sat 8—4Sun Closed

2 employees per shift

Aica&’wAent

_____

DES PLAIN ES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSMAY 25, 2010

MINuTES

l’he Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of I )es Plaines held its regularly scheduled meeting on ‘I’ucsday, May 25,2010. at 7:30 P. M. in City Council Chambers, Room 102, of the Des Plaines Civic Center.

ZONING BOARI) OF APPEALS

PRESENT: Catalano, Ilolhcrr, Porada, Saletnik, Szabo, Secgcrs

ABSENT: None

Also present was Senior Planner, Scott Mangum.

The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P. M.

A motion was made by Porada, seconded by Cafalano, to approve the minutes of the October 27, 2009;November 24, 2009; January 12, 2010; and March 30, 2010 hearings.

AYES: Porada, Catalano, Szabo, Saletnik, Scegers

NAYES: None

MOTION CARRIED

A motion was made by Porada, seconded by Saletnik, to approve the minutes of the May 11,2010 hearing.

AYES: Porada, Saletnik, Ilofherr, Saletnik, Szabo, Catalano, Seegers

NAYES: None

MOTION CARRIED

*****

Chainran Seegers announced that Case #10-02 I -V, 2800 River Road, had been Continued to the Tune 29, 2010,hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals.

Chairman Seegers indicated Mr. Ilolherr had read the minutes of the March 30, 2010, hearing relative to the nextCase, which had been Continued.

“—. — —“

(‘axe 1/I 0—003—CU — 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)(‘axe //10.017—CU — 1855 l.. OakIon Street(‘axe 1110—0 I 8—CU — 480 Potter RoadCase 1/10-015-V - 1415 henry AvenueCase f/I 0-01 2-CU - 1108 lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 21

(‘ase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee Street

Request: A Conditional Use Permit under Section 7.3-6-C of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance,as amended, to authorize the operation of a money transfer (Currency Exchange) operationin the C-3 Listric1.

Mr. [)ickrah Ilanowick, 1108 l.ec Street, 1)cs Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Mr. Porada inquired as to the relationship of Mr. Hanowick to the petitioner, Mr. Leon Lcvikov. Mr. Hanowickstated he is the General Manager for the business. Mr. llolberr inquired as to whether Mr. llanowick owns theproperty. Mr. Ilanowick stated the property is leased. Chairman Seegers inquired as to Mr. Levikov’s position. Mr.Ilanowick stated Mr. Levikov is another manager. Chairman Seegers confirmed both gentlemen are from the samecompany. Mr. Ilanowick confirmed that was correct. Mr. llanowick added Mr. Levikov had to leave town on anemergency. Mr. lianowick stated he requested Mr. Lcvikov pursue this matter. Mr. Ilotherr confirmed Mr.llanowick also operates out of the Des Plaines location. Mr. llanowick confirmed he does.

Chairman Seegers noted that no ownership was present. Mr. Mangum stated the owner had signed the applicationbut was not present. Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether the owner was aware of the request. Mr. Ilanowiekstated he is. Mr. Saletnik inquired as to whether any physical changes to the property are planned. Mr. Hanowickstated none are. Mr. Saletnik inquired as to whether any of the walls would be changed. Mr. 1-lanowick stated nonewould. Mr. Saletnik inquired about the construction of a pass-through window. Mr. Hanowick stated a portion ofthe building had been specified for this usc.

Mr. Szabo inquired as to the nature of the business and whether it would operate as a currency exchange. Mr.Hanowick stated the business would not operate as a traditional currency exchange, but provide limited services,such as wire transfers. Mr. Salentik confirmed the business transfers funds back and forth overseas. Mr. Hanowickstated also within the United States. Mr. Porada confirmed the business acts as an intermediary service for thetransfer of funds using cash or credit card. Mr. Ilanowick confirmed that was correct. Mr. Porada inquired as towhether other services, such as check cashing, were applicable. Mr. Hanowick stated if possible. Mr. Poradainquired as to whether the reason for the currency exchange classification resulted from the money transfer service.Mr. Mangum stated the zoning classification was determined by the Zoning Administrator because no classificationspecific to this type of business exists. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether Staff would recommend in favor of a fullcurrency exchange. Mr. Mangum stated Staffs recommendation was based on the petitioner’s request. Mr. Poradaasked whether that was acceptable to Mr. Flanowick. Mr. Hanowick stated that he would operate within the limitsof whatever the City permits. Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether loans would be made. Mr. Hanowick statednone would. Mr. Porada inquired as to the definition of a currency exchange. Mr. Mangum stated the Ordinancedoes not provide a definition. Mr. Porada suggested a definition is required. Chairman Seegers stated hisagreement. Mr. Saletnik noted a money transfer can be made two ways. Mr. Hanowick stated he only wishes tohave the ability to send money. Mr. Porada expressed concern over the volume of traffic and parking associatedwith the operation of a traditional currency exchange. Mr. Szabo inquired as to whether a money transfer store stillexists on Prairie Street. Mr. Porada stated he is unsure, but is aware of the business to which Mr. Szabo referred.

Mr. Hanowick inquired as to whether he was also permitted to operate his jewelry business at the proposed location.Chairman Seegers stated that was a separate issue. Mr. Porada noted a business license would be required. Mr.Saletnik stated jewelers normally operate in a typical retail environment. Mr. Hanowick stated he has a businesslicense. Mr. Hutherr inquired as to whether the business license pertained to this location. Mr. Hanowick stated thebusiness license is applicable to another location. Chairman Seegers added that the jewelry store/repair is apermitted use.

Chairman Seegers called for the Stall Report to be read by Mr. Mangum.

Staff Report:

Case Ill 0-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (conCd)Case //10—01 7—CU — 1855 E. ()akton Street(‘use //10—01 8—CU 480 Potter RoadCase /110-015-V - 1415 henry AvenueCase 1110-0 1 2-( ‘U — I 108 lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 22

Chairman Seegers stated he did not see a plan illustrating the interior alterations required for the proposed use. Mr.Mangum confirmed only the window would be constructed.

Citing the Plan of ( )pcration, Mr. Saletnik noted the plan indicated a motor vehicle and parts sales business with twoemployees. Mr. hlanowiek confirmed that was correct. Mr. Saletnik eonf rmcd the petitoner intended to add thisservice within the existing business. Mr. Hanowick confirmed that was correct,

Chairman Seegers called for questions or comments by members of the audience, either in favor of or in objection tothe proposal. No persons were present in the audience.

A motion was made by Saletnik, seconded by Szabo, to recommend authorization of the operation of a moneytransfer (Currency Exchange) operation in the C-3 District, with the added Condition to allow checks to becashed.

MOTION CARRIED

1I ‘J•• iiI j—- CiTY OF DES PLAINES

1420 Miner / Northwest highway * Des Plaines, Illinois 60016—4498 * (847) 391 —5300

June 1, 2010

Mayor Moylan and Des Plaines City CouncilCiTY OF DES PLAIN ES

Subject: Zoning Board olAppeals Case// 10-012-CU1108 I ee Street

RE: Request to authorize the operation of a money transfer operation (Currency Exchange)

honorable Mayor and Members of the 1)cs Plaines City Council:

The Zoning Board of Appeals met on May 25, 2010 to consider the above petition. The Zoning Board ofAppeals submits thc Ibilowing:

1. Mr. Dickran Hanowick, a representative fbr the petitioner presented the pertinent facts.

2. The Community Development Department recommended approval of the Conditional UsePermit.

3. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended (6-0) granting approval for the Conditional UsePermit for a money transfer operation with the ability to cash checks.

Respectfhlly submitted,

Arnie SeegersDes Plaines Zoning Board of Appeals, Chaimian

cc: City OfficialsAldennenZoning Board of Appeals CommissionersPetitionersRecording SecretaryFile

Attachment —

CITY OF DES PLAINES

ORDINANCE Z - 14 - 10

AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING FOR A CONDiTIONAL USEPERMIT UNDER SECTION 7.3-6 C. OF THE ZONINGORDINANCE TO PERMIT A MONEY TRANSFER(CURRENCY EXCHANGE) BUSINESS AT 1108 LEESTREET. DES PLAINES, ILLiNOIS. (CASE #10-012-CU).

WHEREAS, application was made by Leon Lcvikov for San Diego Discount Mall, Inc.to the City of Des Plaines Department of Community Development for authorization by the CityCouncil of a Conditional Use Permit to permit a money transfer (currency exchange) businessunder Section 7.3-6 C. of the Zoning Ordinance at 1108 Lee Street in Des Plaines, Illinois; and

WHEREAS, the existing zoning is Ci, General Commercial District; and

WHEREAS, within fifteen (1 5) days of the receipt thereof, said application was referredby the Department of Community Development to the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City ofDes Plaines; and

WHEREAS, within ninety (90) days from the date of said application a public hearingwas held by the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 25, 2010 pursuant to publication in the DesPlaines Journal on May 7, 2010 and notice was mailed to all property owners within 300 feet ofthe subject property of the consideration of the Conditional Use so proposed by the Petitioner;and

WHEREAS, said hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held May 25, 2010pursuant to notice published as required by law, wherein competent testimony and evidence wasgiven with respect to how said Petitioner intended to meet the provisions of the ZoningOrdinance. On June 1, 2010, said Zoning Board of Appeals filed written reports to the CityCouncil of such testimony and evidence and their recommendations approving, by a vote of 6-0,a money transfer (currency exchange) business under Section 7.3-6 C. of the Zoning Ordinance,in a C-3, General Commercial District, at 1108 Lee Street, Des Plaines, Illinois; and

WHEREAS, said Petitioner made certain commitments to the Zoning Board of Appealswith respect to the requested Conditional Use Permit, which representations are hereby found bythe City Council to be material and upon which the City Council relies in granting this requestfor a Conditional Use Permit subject to certain terms and conditions; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the respective written reports of the ZoningBoard of Appeals, together with the applicable standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, theStaff Report dated June 1, 2010, including the Conditional Use Application completed by thePetitioner, together with the exhibits to the Staff Report, which include a Location Map, Site andContext Photos, the drafl Zoning Board minutes of May 25, 2010, and the Letter from theZoning Board of Appeals to the Mayor, which form part of the basis for this ordinance;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of Des

Plaines, Cook County Illinois, in the exercise of its Home Rule powers, as follows:

SECTION 1: That the recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference and

made a part hereof, the same constituting the flictual basis for this Ordinance. The Conditional

Use granted herein is consistent with and the same as a “special use” within the meaning of

Public Act 94-1027.

SECTION 2: That based upon the written reports of the Zoning Board of Appeals, the

applicable standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, the representation to the Zoning Board of

Appeals made by the Petitioner, the Plat of Survey, prepared by Jon P. Tice, dated November 16,

1993, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit “A,” the City

Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to pennit a money transfer (currency exchange)

business, under Section 7.3-6 C. of the Zoning Ordinance, at I 108 Lee Street in Des Plaines,

Illinois.

SECTION 3: That the following Limitations on Conditional Uses shall apply in

accordance with the City of Des Plaines Zoning Code, Sections 3.4-8 “Limitations on

Conditional Uses” and 3.4-9 “Effect of Approval”.

3.4-8: A. No conditional use permit shall be valid for a period longer than one year unless abuilding permit is issued and construction is actually begun within that period and isthereafter diligently pursued to completion. However, the City Council may extend theone-year period to a mutually agreed upon time.

B. The approval of a proposed conditional use permit by the City Council shall bedeemed to authorize only that particular use at that particular location for which theconditional use was issued.

C. Except when otherwise provided for, this Ordinance, a conditional use shall hedeemed to relate to, and be for the benefit of the use and lot in question, rather than theowner or operator of such use or lot.

3.4-9: The approval of a conditional use permit application by the City Council shall notauthorize the development, construction, reconstruction, alteration or moving of anybuilding or structure, but shall merely authorize the preparation, filing and processing of

applications for such permits or approvals as may be required by the regulations of theCity, including but not limited to a Zoning Certificate and a building permit.

SECTION 4: The Zoning Board of Appeals’ recommendations, lindings and conditions

found in the June I, 201 0 memorandum from Arnie Secgcrs, Chairman of the Zoning Board of

Appeals, are incorporated herein by refurence as if fuily set forth herein.

SECTION 5: That the l)roPcrtY at 1108 Lee Street, which is the subject of this

Ordinance, is located within the legally described subject parcel described as follows:

LOTS 3, 4 AND 5 IN BLOCK 8 IN DES PLAINES GARDENS, BEING ASUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 20,TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST’ OF THE THIRD PRINCIPALMERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

PINs: 09-20-120-01 7 09-20-120-01 8 09-20-120-019

SECTION 6: That granting of the Conditional Use Permit for the address of 1108 Lee

Street within the subject property is granted upon the conditions set forth below. Upon failure of

the Petitioner to act upon this authorization within twelve (12) months of the date of this

Ordinance, the granting of the Conditional Use Permit for the subject property shall be

automatically revoked; provided, however, that upon request in writing of the Petitioner prior to

the expiration of the twelve (12) month period, the City Council may at any time, or from time to

time by ordinance duly adopted at any meeting of the City Council, extend said period of time.

SECTION 7: That any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,

neglects or refuses to comply with or resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this

Ordinance shall be fined not less than Seventy-five Dollars ($75.00) or more than Seven

Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($750.00) for each offense. Each and every day that a violation of the

Ordinance is allowed to remain in effect shall constitute a complete and separate offense. In

addition, the appropriate authorities of the City may take such other action as they deem I,roper

to enforce the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, including, without limitation, an action in

equity to compel compliance with its terms. That any person. firm or corporation violating the

3

terms of this Ordinance shall he subject, in addition to the foregoing penalties, to the payment of

court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

SECTION 8: That within 60 days of the passage of said Ordinance, the executed,

original Ordinance shall he returned to the City Clerk’s office.

SECTION 9: If any paragraph, section, clause or provision of this ordinance is held

invalid, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect without affecting the validity of the

remaining portions of the contract.

SECTION 10: That this Ordinance shall he in full force and effect from and after its

passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form according to law.

PASSED this day of .2010

APPROVED this

_____

day of , 2010


MAYORATTEST:

CITY CLERK

Published in pamphlet form this Approved as to form:

_____

dayof ,20l0

___ ____ ___

kCITY CLERK David R. Wiltse, City Attorney

I,

______

, being the owner or other party in interest ofthe property legally described within this Ordinance, having read a copy of the Ordinance, dohereby accept, concur and agree to develop and use the subject property in accordance with the

terms of this Ordinance.

Dated:

_________________

(Signature)

Legal\Ord\Spccial\CU\CU I 08 Lcc S (uiiny Exchang

4

O 7 .- o I; o - c9D/.

//2J .LfO/O/7 °‘PLA T OF SLIf?VEY

lyTICE SURVEY CO.PHONE 823.5947

Distancen era machod in f.. and st.t. of •.d.cimo) ports thereof. County of Cook J Stat. of flimoloOrder No_-Z--—-_—- i, JON P. rICE, • R.9. IN. Land Surveyor, do

haraby certify that I have located the buiIdin on I. JON P. TICE. a R.. III Land Sww. d. ‘.r’Scale 1 Inchtio ahoy. roparty

- _

- hereby cmttrly that I hew. aseveynd the w.d.oñd prnp. and that the p( h •• ru a cact reprewantetioc. ul weld iwew ...._IadRi5. III. Lewd .y.c so a tanop.retw. of 6V rJ.J.4t.

; 7O,,1.red byJ4’1’Compare I tam. and

________________

Refer I. deed or ebttact for buildin* r,otnctmao.t-Us.. Order Numher for aN tutu,’. retr.f,ca. ‘. I.h eo..

j•, ..

FXHIR1T

1312 N. HOFFMAN AVENUEPARK RIDGE. ILLINOIS sOO6N JON P. TICE

ItEGtSltREb ltLtHOI t.AHD SURVEYOR/ilrnJ

J.,tu 3, i unit 5 Jo Block B in fThsPlaS.oaL, Cor,tnnu. befog n

nob totniUn or port of tho North Irnir of Br,ction lçt. l’ounahip

hi North • Itonfrr L7 Royf. of tt,r, Thtpt pj’lnctpol Hir.dtnn. to

Cook co,oity, liiJnoEo. •—i. : --

-E

$

(1)

50fre,rnr7

‘U‘ii


City of Des PlainesFinance Department

14.20 Miner StreetDS PLAINES Des Plaines, IL 60016

lLLINOS Tel: 847-391-5325Fax: 847-391-5402

MEMORANDUM

Date: Julyó,2010

To: Jason Slowins , cting City Manager

From: Ilana Bromber, sistant Director of Finance

Cc: Dorothy Wisniewski, Director of Finance

Subj: Resolution — Jack’s Tents & Productions

Issue: Each year the Special Events Commission rents tents, tables and chairs for the Taste of DesPlaines. Due to the higher than expected number of food vendors participating in the 2010 Taste ofDes Plaines, the Special Events Commission rented additional tents resulting in a total cost of$10,583.55.

Analysis: The original quote from the Jack’s Tents and Productions came in at $8,962.00 and thepurchase order was approved by the Finance Director and the City Manager. However, 2010 Tasteof Des Plaines attracted more food vendors than was originally anticipated, which resulted in theSpecial Events Cominissior authorizing rental of five additional tents, 3 gutters, 16 tables and 10picnic tables with. benches at a cost of $1,621.55. The total amount paid to Jack’s Tents andProductions was $10,583.55 and therefore requires the authorization of the City Council byResolution in addition to the Department Head, Finance Director, and City Manager.

Recommendation: Staff recommends that in the best interest of the City, the City Council waivethe normal bidding procedures and accept the quote for precuts and services on an “as needed basis”from Jack’s Tents and Productions, 3242 Monroe St., Waukegan, Illinois 60085 in the total amountof$ 10,583.55. This project will be funded from Special Events Commission escrow account.

Attachments:QuotesPurchase OrderResolution

Ho- o1 RemAL

5 tA ci-

77

INVITATION TO BID TENTS, TABLES AND CHAIRS / TASTE OF DES PLAINES? JUNE 4,5, AND 6,2

Bid to be submitted in a sealeti envelope plainly marked “Tents, Tables and Chairs,” and In the hands of the it

Clerk, 1420 MinerStreet, Des Plaines, Illinois 60016, belore3 PM on April I, 2010.

PURPOSEThe intent olthe Invitation to Bid is to obtain bids for tents, tables and chairs for the 2010 Taste of Des Plaines, Friday-

Sunday, June 4-6. 20 0, held in downtown Des Plaines along Ellinwood Street. The detailed specifications outlined

below are based on setups from prior Tastes of Des Plaines:

Taste of Des PlainesJune 4, 5, 6, 2010; Set up to be on June 3 & 4, 2010

All tents must be in assorted colors, not black (some black and white

stdped are acceptable), colors must he listed on bid; gutters for tents

are required as part of this bid.

It should be noted that the vendor awarded the bid for the tents,

tables and chairs should be capable of making an emergency

repair/and or replacement within 2 hours during the event.

Walk through of Taste grounds upon request and by appointment

only

30’ x 90’ Frame Tent wilD’ legs (Entertainment)

20’ x 20 Frame Tent w/60’ of counters with bally cloth (Beer)

1 16’ x 24’ Frame Tent wilD’ legs & 40 sidewall (Park District Stage Onver

1 9’ x 70’ White Frame Tent (Sponsor)

9 20’ x 20’ Frame Tents in assorted colors (Food Vendors)

1 20’ x 40’ Frame Tent (Dining)

3 20’ x 60’ Frame Tents (2/Dining, 1/Park District)

1 16’ x 16’ Frame Tent (Sound)

30 6’ long tables for Food Vendors

75 8’ long tables for Dining Tents

10 6’ long Picnic Tables w/benches (seat 6 each)

“ODD Plastic folding chairs/ Pieces! 8’ tall x 30’ long solid sidewall

Water barrels necessary for tents (Required for all tents)

In stall protective safety caps on all stakesSet-up of equipment Thurs, 6/3/10 Start 8 AM (until complete; & Fi., ‘5It/10 complete b’j

4PMPick-up of equipment Sunday 6/6/10, approx 8 PMPatch all stake holes with “Cold Patch’ upon removal of tents

JU Ll.E Dig Confirmation

TOTAL ‘ ‘ 7// ‘ / S ‘ 1 / . -

ZI j0s t’cTh /1J’i1t ( J AiC.

INVITATION TO BID TENTS, TABLES AND CHAIRS I TASTE OF DES PLAINES/ JUNE 4,5, AND 6,2010

Bid to be submitted in a sealed envelope plainly marked “Tents, Tables and Chairs,” and in the hands of the CityClerk1 1420 Miner Street, Des Plaines, Illinois 60016, before 3 PM on April I, 2010.

PURPOSEThe intent of the Invitation to Bid is to obtain bids for tents, tables and chairs for the 2010 Taste of Des Plaines, FridaySunday, )une 4-6, 2010, held in downtown Des Plaines along Ellinwood Street. ‘l’he detailed specifications outlinedbelow are based on setups from prior Tastes of Des Plaines:

Taste of Des PlainesJune 4, 5, 6, 2010; Set up to be on June 3 & 4, 2010

All tents must be in assorted colors, not black (some black and whitestriped are acceptable), colors must be listed on bid; gutters for tentsare required as part of this bid

It should be noted that the vendor awarded the bid for the tents,tables and chairs should be capable of making an emergencyrepairland or replacement within 2 hours during the event.

Walk through of Taste grounds upon request and by appointmentonly.

1 30’ x 90’ Frame Tent whO’ legs (Entertainment)1 20’ x 20’ Frame Tent w/60’ of counters with bally cloth (Beer)1 16’ x 24’ Frame Tent whO’ legs & 40’ sidewall (Park District Stage Cover)1 9’ x 70’ White Frame Tent (Sponsor)9 20’ x 20’ Frame Tents in assorted colors (Food Vendors)1 20’ x 40’ Frame Tent (Dining)3 20’ x 60’ Frame Tents (2/Dining, 1/Park District)1 16’ x 16’ Frame Tent (Sound)

30 6’ long tables for Food Vendors75 8’ long tables for Dining Tents10 6’ long Picnic Tables w/benches (seat 6 each)

1000 Plastic folding chairs— Piecesl 8’ tall x 30’ long solid sidewallL3L. *Water barrels necessary for tents (Required for all tents)_._V Install protective safety caps on all stakes

Set-up of equipment Thurs., 6/3/10 Start 8AM —(until complete) & Fri., 6/4110 complete by...V 4PM.— Pick-up of equipment Sunday, 6/6110, approx. 8 PM/ Patch all stake holes with “Cold Patch” upon removal of tents

1 JULIE. Dig Confirmation

/),.24i37) TOTAL

Ml’h5fr4—

ç. 9Iej- 7,‘

ell /l-Jk4*/2 t

/I,S99,e)D -7-e6’

P

(tfll1 CITY OF DES PLAINES1420 MINER STREET

DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS 60016TELEPHONE: (847) 391 5300

PURCHASE ORDERORG. NO. ACCOUNT NO OEPARTMENT DIVISION VENDOR NO. - PURCHASE ORDER NO

$604 410155 Special Events 040510

VENDOR NAME Jacks Tents & Productions

ATTN:

ADDRESS 3242 Monroe St.

DTY, STATE, ZIP Waukegan, IL 60085

SH

P

T0

(K’sTEN

3242 Monroe St.Waukegan, IL. 60085Ph: 847/775-1850Fx: 847/775-1829

DELIVER TO:City of Des PlainesEllinwood St.Des Plaines, IL 60016

TELEPHONE H) 847-391-5300C)

ACCOUNT TO:

ORDERED BY:TELEPHONE W)

e)

DELIVERY DATE:06/03 & 06/04 by 4:00 COLLECTION DATE: 06/06/10USED TIME: 06/4 — 06//10 TIME AM/PM: 8:00pm

INVOICE

Credit on 10’ Sponsor Tent

Balance Due:

$1,235.80$30.00

$112.00$350.00

$1,727.80

<$106.25>

$1q621.55

-:

/L/’MT /

. / ;L

., ---- I (‘

L_.___—iX.i1

5316

Gutters connecting food vendors

10

20’ x 20’ Frame Tent assorted colors (Food Vendors)

Tables — 6’ Banquet for food vendorsPicnic Tables w/ benches

Qty. Description

. - T--- - l1

Please Remit To:Jack’s Tents & Productions

3242 Monroe St.Waukegan, IL. 60085

l Id lid I \ i; [)CJi OF J):S pPjNrFs

ACCOUNTS PAYALE

;L 1’

I i -1-

a - P V-

3242 Monroe St.Waukegan, IL. 60085Ph: 847/775-1850Fx: 847/775-1829

DELIVER TO:City of Des PlairiesEllinwood St.Des Plairies, IL 60016

TELEPHONE H) 847-391-5300C)

ACCOUNT TO:

ORDERED BY:TELEPHONE W)

e)

DELIVERY DATE:06/03 & 06/04 by 4:00 COLLECTION DATE: 06/06/10USED TIME: 06/4 — 06//10 TIME AM/PM: 8:00pm

QUOTE FOR PRODUCTS & SERVICES

Qty. Description Amount_1

1 30’ x 90’ Frame Tent w/ 10’ legs RIW (Entertainment) $1,300.001 20’ x 20’ Frame Tent w/60’ of counters & skirting B/W (Beer) $295.001 16’ x 24’ Frame Tent whO’ legs White or R/W & 40’ sidewall (Stage Cover) $320.001 10’ x 70’ White Frame Tent (Sponsor) $375.009 20’ x 20’ Frame Tent assorted colors R/W, B/W, G/W (Food Vendors) — $2,225.001 20’ x 40’ Frame Tent R/’V (Dining) $400.003 20’ x 60’ Frame Tent_BIW, G/W, Y!W (2/Dining, 1/Park District) $1,650.001 16’ x 16’ Frame Tent White or R/W (Sound) $185.009 Gutters connecting food vendors —

— $90.00130 - Water Barrels for anchoring — assuming required for all tents $0.0030 Tables — 6’ Banquet for food vendors $210.0075 Tables — 8’ Banquet for Dining Tent $562.0010 Picnic Tables w/ benches $350.00

1000 Chairs — Plastic folding $1,000.00Contract Total: $8,962.00

Color Chart: R/W Red, B/W Blue, G/W Green, Y/W YellowSafety Caps

- @ .20/eachSide Walls — 20’ x 8’ solid @ $20.00/each

Note:Water Access and all water to be suppllepyCity of Des PIns_Jack’s Tents & Productions agrees to make any reasonable emergencyrepair and/or repjernent within 2 hours during_theyett__JacICs Tents will Patch all stake holes (if ay) with Cold Patch.Jack’s Tents will supply J.U.LJ.E. dig conlirmation if needed.

50% Non-Refundable Deposit Upon Acceptance of Contract.

The customer accepts this agreement for goods & services and agre to the canceliati ii policy specified on this lor:n.

Authorized Signature;- - -

-—

CITY OF DES PLAINES

RESOLUTION R - 92 - 10

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN ADDITIONALPAYMENT TO JACK’S TENTS FOR TENTS, TABLES ANDCHAIRS FOR THE 2010 TASTE OF DES PLAINES.

WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the Cityto contract with individuals, associations and corporations, in any manner not prohibited by lawor ordinance; and

WHEREAS, the 10th Annual Taste of Des Plaines (Taste), sponsored by the SpecialEvents Commission, took place June 4, 5, and 6, 2010; and

WHEREAS, the original quote submitted by Jack’s Tents for tents, tables and chairs forthe Taste was in the amount of $8,962.00, which was accepted by the City and payment wasprocessed; and

WHEREAS, a higher number of food vendors participated in the Taste this year thanwas anticipated, requiring additional tents, tables and chairs; and

WHEREAS, the additional items totaled $1,621.55, bringing the total amount to be paidto Jack’s Tents to $10,583.55; and

WHEREAS, the purchasing policies and guidelines in the City Code require contracts orpurchases over $10,000.00 to be let and must be presented to City Council for approval; and

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to waive the purchasing policies andguidelines in the City Code and authorize the additional payment of $1,621 .55 to Jack’s Tentsfor the additional tents, tables and chairs needed for the Taste;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Des

Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows:

SECT1ON 1: That the recitals set forth herein above are incorporated herein by reference

as the factual basis for this transaction.

SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby waives the purchasing policies and

guidelines in the City Code and authorizes the additional payment of $1,621.55 to Jack’s Tents

& Productions, 3242 Monroe Street, Waukegan, Illinois 60085 for the additional tents, tables and

chairs needed for the Taste.

SECTION 3: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its

passage and approval according to law.

PASSED this

____

day of , 2010.

APPROVED this day of

_____ _____,

2010.


ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

Lcgal\Res\2010’Jacks Tents Faste 2010

MAYOR

Approved as to form:

t-’

iL? h”t.Lá..David R. Wiltse, City Attorney

2


City of Des PlainesPublic Works & Engineering Department

1111 Joseph Schwab RoadEAiii Des Plaines, IL 60016

ILLINOIS Tel: 847-391-5464Fax: 847-297-6801

4Date: July 6, 2010

To: Jason Slowinski, cti ig City Manager

From: Timothy Watkins, perintendent of Utility Services

Cc: Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works & Engineering-9

Re: O’l-[are Lake Pumping Station Repairs - Pump 3

Issue: The three pumps at O’Hare Lake Pumping Station experienced damage from the flood event inSeptember of 2008. Pump I and 2 have already been repaired. Pump 3 is next to be serviced.

Analysis: Shortly after the flood, staff contacted three firms capable of working on large storm water(20,000 gpm) pumps to provide an initial inspection. Metropolitan Industries, Flydroaire Service andGasvoda & Associates performed inspection work at the facility and all companies agreed that the pumpsneeded to be removed one at a time, serviced in the shop and reinstalled. At a minimum, cable andthermo-sensor failures were expected in all three pumps.

On April 20, 2009, the City Council accepted a proposal from Gasvoda & Associates, an authorized KSBrepair facility, to repair Pump I at a cost of $34,117. On March 1, 2010 the City Council accepted aproposal from Gasvoda & Associates to repair Pump 2 at a cost of $33,447. Since these pumps are fromGermany, parts availability and qualified service companies are limited. Both pumps have been repairedand reinstalled. Gasvoda & Associates has now assessed Pump 3 and has provided a repair quote(attached) in the amount of $29,350.

Staff has filed an application for reimbursement with the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) since the pumps were damaged during the flood of 2008, a Federally Declared Disaster. FEMAhas approved the pump repair expenditures and will reimburse the City 75% of the repair costs, consistentwith their mitigation policy.

Currently, Pumps I and 2 are flIlly operational. However, staff has developed a bypass pumping plan,utilizing City owned portable pumps, in the event supplemental pumping is necessary during the pumprepairs.

Recommendation: We recommend approval of the proposal from Gasvoda & Associates, the regionalfactory authorized repair facility for KSB, to repair and reinstall Pump 3 in the amount of S2),350.00.Source of funding would he the Water/Sewer Fund.

Attachments:(iasvoda and Associates ProposalPurchase OrderResolution

of 4

--- --

GASVODA & ASSOCIATES, INC.Helping people use water efficiently’

PROPOSAL

DATE: June 8. 2010

PROJECT: Re: Proposal for the rebuild of your thirdKSB / PNT Storm pumpS/N-4-809-653660/2

ENGINEER: N/A

The seller hereby offers the following equipment subject to all terms & conditions noted on this contract:

Date: 6/8/2010To: City of Des Plaines / Public WorksAttn: Timothy WatkinsE-mail: twatkins(desplaines.orgFrom: Ed Bukowski

Re: Proposal for the rebuild of your third KSB / PNT Storm pumpS/N-4-809-653660/2

Mr. Watkins.

(iasvoda & Associates is pleased to quote you for the rebuild of your third KSB / PNT pump (S/N — PNR-4-80-653660/2) wepresently have in for tear down / inspection. Ihe following report details what we found after the tear down of your unit wascompleted.

After the disassembly and inspection was completed have the following to report:• NC) evidence of moisture at any point in the seals, motor windings or termination housings.• Casing oint/ seal seats had typical corrosion. (none needing repairs or restoration).• Bearings were not spun or rough and are scheduled for replacement at reassembly.• All sensors appeared to be in their proper positions.

TO: City of Des Plaines / Public Works

EM AlL: [email protected]

ATTN: Timothy Watkins

Project: Re: Proposal fbr the rebuild of your third KSB I PNT Storm pump S/N-4-809-653660/2

• Motor windings checked. ‘High Potential -good-I75OVAC, ILock Rotor good- 290A. ‘Winding Resistance —good-

2.1.21.2 Ohms! Insulation Resistance Infinity (i I 000VAC

• Rotor shaft does have minor pitting on the mechanical seal journal and will be repaired.

Gasvoda & Associates recommends the following replacement parts and repairs for the rebuild of the third Storm Pump unit.

• All 0-rings• All sealing rings• All gaskets• New mechanical seals• New bearings (upper and lower units)• New angular contact bearing• Seal cover plate and ring replacement• New desiccant bags• New power cables replacement (2 each) @ 80’• New pump sensor cable replacement (I each) (a 80’• Repair of rotor shaft assembly• Motor windings electrical checks and tests

After the assembly has been completed we will pressure test the unit and run final shop tests for proper operation of the rebuilt

pump.

This proposal is a turn key project for rebuild and re-installation labor, parts, travel time and mileage. As in the removal phase

of this project you will again furnish a crane and operator for the installation of the pump at your station.

• Your investment for the rebuilding of this unit to include all above listed parts, shop pressure testing, electrical checks

of the pump after rebuild has been completed, labor for the re-installation at your station with you furnishing the crane

and crane operator, travel time, mileage and flatbed truck will be $29,350.00

Should you have any questions concerning this proposal please feel free to call me and as always thank you for the opportunity

to quote this project and for choosing Gasvoda & Associates for your service needs. We will wait to hear back from you on how

to proceed with this project.

Project: Re: Proposal for the rebuild of your third KSB / PNT Storm pump S/N-4-809-653660/2

This proposal and the attached terms and conditions cannot he modified in any way except by expressed written approval ofGasvoda & Associates, Inc.

TERMS: 100°/b 30 days NET.DURATION: This proposal is valid for 30 days after which we reserve the right to review or withdraw.

GASVODA & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACCEPTED:

(Authorized signature i

BY: V71t1t1 ‘. tC?t’S -—___________ Title:

____________________________________________

Edmund F-I. Bukowski, Service ManagerDate:

___________________________________________________________

AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED:

Authorization to proceed with placing the proposed equipment on order must he acknowledged by the return of this documentproperly executed where required. Such acknowledgment will be considered as your acceptance of this proposal understanding theterms stated.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide our proposal. Please do not hesitate to call with any further questions or requirements.

PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER:

________________

SPECIAL MARKINGS:

___________________

T ‘\XABLE:

__________________

TAX lD#:

Project: Re: Proposal l’or the rebuild olyour third KSB / PNT Storm pump S/N -4-809-653660/2

GAS VODA & ASSOCIATES INC FERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE

FERMSTerms of payment are 10(1% net 30 days from “date of invoice” unless otherwise stated ftir all orders less than $100,000

2 Orders greater than or equal to $100,000 are subject to progress payments noted below Terms remain net 30 days from “date of itivoice

a 25% due upon release to construction or approved shop drawingsh 75% due upon shipment or notice of readiness to ship

CONDITIONSGeneralSubject only to any credit terms which Seller may extend, the total purchase price hereunder is disc at such time, within or after the estimated shipment

period specified on the face hereot as said equipment is ready to he shipped Buyer shall pay in full all invoices within the time for payment specified

therein and BUYER’S PAYMENT OBLIGATION IS NO WAY DEPENDENf OR CONTINGENT UPON BUYER’S RECEIPT OF PAYMENt FROM

ANY OTHER PARTY. Any balance owed by Buyer Ow 30 days or more after the same becomes due is subject to a 1-1/2% per month delinquency charge

until paid In addition to all other amounts due hereunder, Buyer shall reimburse Seller in full tbr all collection costs or charges, including reasonable

attorney’s thes, which Seller may incur with respect to the collection of past due amounts from Buyer

2 WarrantySeller warrants only that said equipment is free from detects in materials and svorkmanship as set forth in Seller’s standard Certificate of Warranty furnished

to Buyer tt the time isf tinal shipment Seller makes no other warritnty concerning said equipment beyond that set forth in said Certificate and expressly

disclaims any warranty of merchantability or fitness for any particular process not described in the applicable drawings and specifications.

Seller’s sole responsibility with respect to any equipment cvhicls proves to be detective as to materials or wtsrkmanship is either to replace or iii repair the

same as is set forth in said Certificate of Warranty Unless authorized in writing by Seller. Seller is not responsible Ow any charge or expense incurred for

de modtflcatiois, servicing or adjusting of said equipment after the same has been delivered to Buyer

.3 Liability of SellerSeller is not liable in any event hereunder Our any consequential, incidental. or liquidated damages or penalties

4 Claim I’eriodBuyer shall immediately inspect said equipment upon receipt thereof Seller is not obligated to consider any claim for shortages or non-conformance unless

notitied thereof by Buyer within 10 days after Buyer’s receipt of said equipment

5 CancellationShould Bttyei cancel this agreement without Sellers prior ssritten consent. Slter may’. at its option. recocer from Buyer a cancellation charge of not less than

211% of the purchase price hereunder

6 taxesSale may be subject to slate sales tas depending on the state tbuiuvods & Associates eqttires proof of exemption for all mmmntas”,ihle sales Regardless of

exemption status. Gasvoda & Associates proposal does not include any sales tax Pay’uuient of any sales tax remains the responsibility of the purchaser

7 ruteIf at such time. within cir after the estimated huptiienl period specified on the face hereof as Seller notifies Buyer that said cilmupinent is ready to tie shipped

Buyer requests a delay in shipment. Seller may at its option, agree to store said equipment for a peimod of time determined by Seller, pros tdcd that such

agreement will not afOct Buyer’s obligation to pity in fill all invoices ,us they become due, and prums.ided fuither that for each month. ot portion thereof saud

equipment is stored by Seller. Buyer shall pay to Seller a a stmage fee an amount ecluitl to 1% of the balance due hereunder

8 Drawings, Illustrations and ManualsCatalog and proposal drissvings. bulletins and tither accompanying literature are solely fir the purpose oh general style, arrangement and uupprosimate

dimensions Seller may make any changes Seller deems necessary or desirable

9 lnsurrtneeWe have made no al lo ii ices liii spec al i nstu rance requirements mel siding bitt not limited mum ‘A iii vei mit Subrogation’ . I’ orm ( jC2i II) I iq ii dated

damages. or anything ties mind what us speciticiilly spelled out as being included hereiti Wc reserve the right to amend ottr offering fir any thing requumred

outside (it the specific’ umenm/sen ices spelled out as luemmig included .\n e’ception must he in us riti;ip and authuiii,cd hs I i,usvmmda & Associates

10 StartUpNO SI AR Ft P ‘A 11.1 HI \lAl)l PRIoR 1) ‘1(1% PAYMIN I ‘Asrranty is mnsalid vitlsoutauthori,ed start tip

CITYOF

DES PLAINESILLINOIS

CITY OF DES PLAINES1420 MINER STREET

DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS 60016TELEPHONE: (847) 391-5300

PURCHASE ORDER

ORG. NO. AC(’OLNF NO. PROJE(’[ (;OI)E DEPT/ DIVISION VENDOR NO. Pt R(’LIASE ORDER No.

5025 930060 Sewer PW uS 10-10

VENDOR NAME

ATTN

ADDRESS

(iT’’, STA’I’E, ZIP

(iasvoda & Associates

Ed Bukowski

1530 Fluntington Drive

Calumet City, IL 60409

SHIPTO

PAGE 1 0F2

QL ANTITY ITEM / DESCRIPTION I Nil’ EXTENDEI)COST

Repair. reinstall and test pump #3 at O’Hare Lake pump station. 29,350.00 29,350.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Not to Exceed $29.35000 0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.0()

0.00

SUB-TOTAL, 29,350.00

SHIPPING / OTHER

‘IOTA L $29,350.00

DATE REQUESTED BY DEPARTMENT [lEAD FINANCE DIRE(”IOR (‘ITY MANAGER

7/6/lU Fimoihy Watkins Timothy Oakley

Fliëctivc 0 /01/09

VENDOR SECTION

PRICE CON’I’AC’I’ PERSON

VENDOR NAME P1{ONE

ADDRESS FAX

CITY, STATE, ZIP EMAIL

.) PRICE

VENDOR NAME

AD[)RESS

CON fACT PERSoN

PHONE

FAX

CITY, STATE. ZIP EMAIL

3. PRICE

VENDOR NAME

ADDRESS

CITY, STArE, ZIP

CONTACT PERSON

PHONE

FAX

EMAIL

VENDORRECOMMENDED

OTHER PR()JE(T COSTS

Gasvoda & Associa{es TOTAL AMOUNTBUDGETED

ONGOING OPERATINGCOSTS

THIS PURCEIASE AND OTHER PROJECT COSTS ARE EXPECTED TO REMAIN WITHIN TILE YES NO

BUDGET: (CHECK BOX)

PLEASE MARK ALL BOXES BELOW THAT APPLY 1’O TIllS PURCHASE:

APPROVAL OF I,OWEST RFXPONSIBL,E BII)DFR PROFESSIONAl, SERVICES C’ONSIJI.TING

EMERGENCY PURCHASE SOIL SOURCE SuPPLIER

EQUIPMENT STANDARDIZA [ION l’ECIINICAI, NATURE OF ITEMS MAKES COMPETITION IMPOXSIB[,E

JOINT GOVLRNMLNF PUR(’IIASING PROGRAM OTIILR (PLEASE EXPLAIN BELOW)

EXPLANATION: Waive fornml hid procedures and authoriie tiasvoda & Associa(es (0 repair pump #3 at ( )I-Iare lake.

FOR PURCHASES OVER $10,000

A FORMAl REQUEST FOR A RES( )I.I I [ION (lAS BEEN S[JBM IlTEF) ‘[0 LEGAL: (CHECK BOX) YES NO(‘[(IS ITEM HAS BEEN Pl.A(’EI) ON CONSENT AGENDA: (Cl ([(‘K BOX) ES NO

PAGE 2 OF 2 Et’k[ivc 01/01/09

$29,350.00

CITY OF DES PLAIN ES


A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING GASVODA &ASSOCIATES, INC. TO REPAIR AND REINSTALL THETHIRD KSB/PNT STORM WATER PUMP AT O’HARELAKES PUMPING STATION.


WHEREAS, the three KSB/PNT storm water pumps at O’Hare Lake Pumping Stationwere damaged in the flood event in September 2008; and

WHEREAS, it was determined that the pumps must be removed from the station one at atime, serviced in a shop and reinstalled; and

WHEREAS, on April 20, 2009, the City Council authorized Gasvoda & Associates, Inc.,a KSB/PNT authorized repair facility, to remove and repair and reinstall the first pump; and

WHEREAS, on March 1, 2010, the City Council authorized Gasvoda & Associates, Inc.,to remove and repair and reinstall the second pump; and

WHEREAS, Gasvoda & Associates, Inc. removed the third pump and provided a repairand reinstallation quote in the amount of $29,350.00; and

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to waive the purchasing policies andguidelines in the City Code to authorize Gasvoda & Associates, Inc. to perform the repairs andreinstall the third KSB/PNT storm water pump at O’Hare Lakes Pumping Station at a cost not toexceed $29,350.00 and to authorize the Director of Finance, or her designee, to issue payment toGasvoda & Associates, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $29,350.00 upon receipt of invoice and

approval of work pertbrrned;


Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as ftlIows:

SECTION 1: That the recitals set forth herein above are incorporated herein by reference


SECTION 2: That in the best interest of the City, the City Council hereby waives the

purchasing policies and guidelines in the City Code and authorizes Gasvoda & Associates, Inc.

to perform the repairs and reinstall the third KSB/PNT storm water pump at O’Hare Lakes

Pumping Station in an amount not to exceed $29,350.00, and authorizes the Acting City

Manager to execute the contract documents.

SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby authorizes the Director of Finance, or her

designee, to issue payment to Gasvoda & Associates, Inc., 1530 Huntington Drive, Calumet

City, Illinois 60409, in an amount not to exceed $29,350.00 upon receipt of invoice and approval

of work performed.



PASSED this

______

day of , 2010.

APPROVED this day of ____ , 2010.


MAYOR

ATTEST: Approved as to form:

,_) •i I- ‘

____

—___

,, lL,tACITY CLERK David R. Wiltse, City Attorney

Legal\Res\2010\Gasvoda O’Haie lake Pumping Station Pump Replacement

2


City of Des Paines,‘ Public Works Departmentii 1111 JosephSchwabRoad

DES PLAINES) Des Flames, IL 60016-

Tel: 847-391-5464Fax: 847-297-6801

Date: June 17, 2010

\;To: Jason Slowinski cting City Manager

From: Howard Mose Ac ing Superintendent of General Services

Cc: Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering

Subject: Accept Bid Award through Northwest Municipal Conference -- Street Lane Marking

Issue: The Public Works Division contracts thermoplastic street lane marking each year basedon a citywide survey of existing markings. Thermoplastic is a plastic resin applied while hot,which gives it a much longer wear life than latex paint. This project consists of’ removing andrepainting centerlines, crosswalks, stop bars, and parking lane lines at various locationsthroughout the City.

Analysis: Attached is a copy of the Northwest Municipal Conference (NWMC) SuburbanPurchasing Cooperative bid tabulation and the proposal and award notice for 2010 LaneMarking. NWMC annually bids this contract on behalf of’ its members.

Recommendation: Staff recommends acceptance of the lane marking bid award through theNorthwest Municipal Conference Suburban Purchasing Cooperative, from Superior RoadStriping Inc.. 1967 Cornell Court, Meirose Park, Illinois 60160, at the following unit costs:

4” line - $0.54 I linear ft. 24” line - $3.25 I linear ft.

6” line - $0.73 I linear ft. Letters and symbols - $3.00 / sq ft.

12” line - $1.50 I linear ft. Marking removal - $0.90 / sq ft.

This project will he Funded from budgeted Motor Fuel Tax funds not to exceed $30,000.

Attachments:Bid TabulationProposal I Award NoticeResolution

Thermoplastic Lane Marking

Bid Tabulations

April 6, 2010

Vendor Total

Superior Road Striping $467,80937

Mark-It-Corporation $550,294.77

Marking Specialists $587,425.78

Road Safe Traffic Systems $604,780.22

A. C. Pavement Striping $629,697.50

/0

Iliuiois Departmentof Transportation

COUNTY OF

STATE OF ILLINOIS

Proposal I Contract Cover

Con&aclor’s Name ‘

Street P.O. Box

CRy Slate Zip Code

,iIcicY) I iJL(Name of City ViIlae, TowJ ord District)

SPEClFlCATIONS

1—J

CONTRACT PROPOSAL

s-CONTRACT

CONTRACT BOND

FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF

&O)fl ta 4Jarkiiq

U.FYôr UflER

Ci May LI President of Board of Trustees [4iIunicipai Official

For County and Road District Projects

Submitted/Appcoved

________________________________

Date

_______

Ci Highway Commissioner

Submitted/Approved

________________________________

Date

Cl County Engineer/Superintendent of Highways

Department of Transportation

LI Released for bid based on limited review

Date

Regional Engineer

Concurrence in approval of award

Date APR 2 7 2010

‘p1. C4Regional Engineer

PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY

Cdpøc Ssii’i

STREET NAME OR ROUTE NO.

SECTION NO.

TYPES OF FUNDS

For Municipal Projects

Submitted / /Approved/Passed 7f /‘j/LcZ

ri’ Date

; 4-,. C4:8-J’----

Printed 4ia1201 0 SIR 12210 (Rev12108108)

Ilinois Departmentof 1iansportation Notice to Bidders

Route _J,p(jRETURN WITH BID County

__________________

Local Agency

______________

Section ...-

Time and Place of Opening of Bids

Sealed proposals for the improvement described below will be received at the office of A -ir’—/Uufsfr)fz.lr-cct4- !(‘k’ AT eiF P(4fl&5, .iL C/i’J,n p

until Q” 5t o’clock ...A.. M. A pt & zp I p Proposals will be opened and reaci’$’ublicly

at I ( 00 o’clock l. M. /-1pI 42..OI C at the office of Vii tii— thflfri p.11thLt EiSY 4RiOI91ífr 11 (udoi h’WJ4 Cthe Ciis).

Description of Work

Name t:2 C ( C t2 14P. kgck W Length

_________

feet (

_______

miles)

Location /(nfl LV, 5+1el ‘lftthp Arfrli a /kI— 5ukwj,s

Proposed Improvement ()rls5J- ,4- iiPdp/ RiiIPMAPYkj-frJ YttiVi2i

ol— Y•aoL5 ,te&i t’r 1-i’lf. tjir pa.e&Bidders Instructions

1. Plans and proposal forms will be available in the office of .J0,t,jf5f(lIjj(U apiI ID /, &-&* 9 nji (79r,, 9&

2. If prequalification is required the 2 low bidders must file within 24 hours alter the letting an “Affidavit of Availability”(Form BC 57), in triplicate, showing all uncompleted contracts awarded to thenl and all low bids pending award forFederal, State, County, Municipal and private work. One copy shall be filed with the Awarding Authority and 2 copieswith the IDOT District Office.

3. All proposals must be accompanied by a proposal guaranty as provided in BLRS Special Provision for BiddingRequirements and Conditions for Contract Proposals contained in the “Supplemental Specifications and RecurringSpecial Provisions”.

4. The Awarding Authority reserves the right to waive technicalities and to reject any or all proposals as provided inBLRS Special Provision for Bidding Requirements and Conditions for Contract Proposals contained in the“Supplemental Specifications and Recurring Special Provisions”.

5. Bidders need not return the entire contract proposal when bids are submitted inless otherwise required. Portions ofthe proposal that must be returned include the following.

a. BLR 12210 - Contract Cover f. BLR 12230- Proposal Bid Bond (if applicable)b. SLR 12220 - Notice to Bidders g. BLR 12325 —Apprenticeship or Training Programc. BLR 12221 - Contract Proposal Certification (do not use for federallyd. BLR 12222 - Contract Schedule of Prices funded prolects)e. BLR 12223 - Signatures

6. The quantities appearing in the bid schedule are approximate and are prepared for the comparison of bids. Paymentto the Contractor will be made only for the actual quantities of work performed arid accepted or materials furnishedaccording to the contract. The scheduled quantities of work to be done and materials to be furnished may beincreased, decreased or omitted as hereinafter provided.

Printed 318/2010 Page 1 of 2 BLR 12220 (Rev 01109/08)

(llhnos Departmentof Transportation

IRETURN WITH lD I

RouteCountyLoc& AgencySection

Schedufe of Prices

JO..ni 5(‘,(AIbL 1f• 1At’ 4 tJi’&r c

f1-tit1l ui4ioi.:r -pc—r -?4,lL

(For comolete intormatlon coverino thece dams, see clans and scecficalions

7A8iR 1222 Rev CdiO?35j

UnitItem No. Items Unit

-

Quantity Price Total

214fllØf_ 41i P’11. 27(. 2/iJtftt L/J. tctij

P/L?’F?—. fl3?f-?4t?cMyI (/,

1r’e’f7 ri 927

Pt.

‘4 ,

..

. 3.o

çrA / Z I—

Page Total To be carried forward to Page )

Pnnt.d 341612010

)illinois Departmentof Transportation

RETURN WITH BID

Route-

Sgnatures

County ‘‘ Ln4 ,1flLocal Agency /J , lft.Wl L, C -

Section

(If an individual)

Signature of Bidder

Business Address

(If a partnership)Firm Name

Signed By

_____

Business Address

InsertNames andAddresses ofAll Partners

Corporate Namf fliiS 1) LL41CSigned By

V President

ceu o.’r1Business Addr

\e\-ce k-1L :R

(If a corporation)

InsertNames ofOfficers

Attest

Page 1 cliPrinted on 31812010 1 1:02:03 AM

{ President t(\ iThSecretary

Treasurer vi --

$LR 12223 (Re’, 7105)

Page gg

CITY OF DES PLAINES


A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ACCEPTTHE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BID OFFER THROUGHTHE NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCESUBURBAN PURCHASING COOPERATIVE FROMSUPERIOR ROAD STRIPING, INC. FOR STREET LANEMARKINGS.


WHEREAS, the City of Des Plaines conducts a city wide survey each year of thosestreets which require refreshing of the street lane markings; and

WHEREAS, the City of Des Plaines is allowed to accept bids through the NorthwestMunicipal Conference Suburban Purchasing Cooperative bid process; and

WHEREAS, the Northwest Municipal Conference Suburban Purchasing Cooperative letan area wide bid for 2010 street lane markings; and

WHEREAS, the Northwest Municipal Conference selected Superior Road Striping, Inc.as the lowest responsible bidder to the area wide bid; and

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept the street lane marking hidthrough the Northwest Municipal Conference Suburban Purchasing Cooperative from SuperiorRoad Striping, Inc. for the striping of existing lane markings throughout the City at a cost not toexceed $30,000.00 and to authorize the Director of Finance, or her designee, to issue payment toSuperior Road Striping, Inc. upon receipt of invoice and approval of work completed in anamount not to exceed $30,000.00.


Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as thilows:

SECTION 1: That the recitals set forth herein above are incorporated herein by reference


SECTION 2: That in the best interest of the City, the City Council hereby accepts the

street lane marking hid through the Northwest Municipal Conference Suburban Purchasing

Cooperative from Superior Road Striping, Inc. for the striping of existing lane markings

throughout the City at a cost riot to exceed $30,000.00, and authorizes the Acting City Manager

to execute the contract documents.


designee, to issue payment to Superior Road Striping, Inc. for street lane markings in an amount

not to exceed $30,000.00 upon receipt of invoice and approval of work completed.



PASSED this

______

day of

____________

, 2010.

APPROVED this

_____

day of , 2010.


MAYOR


____________

&.P ?iCITY CLERK David R. Wiltse, City Attorney

[egal\Res\2010\I3id Award NWMC Street Laiie Marking - SupeTior Road Stiiping

2


City of Des Plaines7 Police Department

1420 Miner StreetDES PLAINES Des Plaines, IL 60016‘ ILLINOIS Tel: 847-391-5400

Fax: 847-391-5463

MEMORANDUM

Date: June 23,2010

To:

From:

Jason Slowinski

Subj: Award Shooting Range Refurbishing Request for Proposal (RFP)

Issue: On Monday, April 19, 2010, the City Council authorized the police department to post aRequest fur Proposal (RFP) to refurbish our shooting range located on the second floor of the publicworks facility at 1111 Campground Road. Seven vendors were contacted to provide information onthe replacement of the bullet trap, target carriers and ventilation system as indicated in the RFP.This memorandum will outline the selection of the lowest responsible pioposal for this project,which will he funded with federal asset forfeiture monies — at no cost to City of Des Plaines 2010budget.

Analysis: As indicated in my memorandum dated April 7, 2010, which requested approval to seeka Request for Proposal (REP) to refurbish the department’s shooting range, there are several factorsthat led to this decision. The current bullet trap is damaged beyond repair and ballistic curtains havebeen installed to prevent bullet fragments from rebounding back towards officers on the shootingline. Additionally, the target carrier system in inoperable and officers are forced to walk downrange to shoot targets that are permanently fixed near the bullet trap. The ventilation system is alsoantiquated and needs to be replaced to guarantee the safe dispersal of contaminated air that ispresent during indoor firearms tmining. Another important factor concerning our current range isthat it is not capable of handling the weaponry that is carried by our officers during their tour ofduty. This memorandum is attached for review by the City Council.

A Request for Proposal (RFP) was drafted and sent to seven (7) vendors that specialize inrefurbishing police shooting ranges. This RFP included the demolition of the existing range andinstallation of a new bullet trap, ventilation system, target carrier system and range consoleelectronics. The following vendors were contacted: Patriot Range Technologies, LLC (LaGrange,IL), Meggitt Training Systems, Inc (Suwanee, GA), Carey’s Action Target (Provo, UT), AdvancedInteractive Systems, Inc (Trout Valley, IL), Savage Range Systems (Westfield, MA), TRS RangeServices (Eagle, ID), Range Systems (New I-lope, IVIN).

Each vendor had the opportunity to tour the project site at the public works facility beforesubmitting their proposal and this was coordinated through Commander Nick Treantafales,Commander Paul Burger and OI’licer Trcnt Beier of the Des Plaines Police Department. Theseolhcers were also responsible lbr reviewing the flnal proposals, which were due to be submitted tothe City Clerk’s Office by May 21, 2010.

Four (4) vendors ultimately submitted proposals for refurbishing the police shooting range aslollows:

• Patriot Range Technologies - $253,707.50• Carey’s Action Target - $345,815• Meggitt ‘[raining Systems - $438,611.02• Advanced Interactive Systems - $2,461,573

The proposals were reviewed based on related experience in completing similar projects, ability toachieve desired results within the con lined area of our current square footage and proposed cost ofthe project. The proposal from Patriot Range ‘l’echnologies is determined to he the best and mostcost effective proposal to refurbish the department’s shooting range.

Patriot Range Technologies has extensive experience in refurbishing existing shooting ranges forlocal and lèderal law enforcement agencies. They are a local (Chicago area) vendor with anexcellent reputation for customer service and they are able to complete this project without alteringthe limited square footage currently available. Additionally, their proposal is substantially less thanthe next lowest cost submitted.

Recommendation: Based on the information submitted by the four vendors who responded to theRequest lbr Proposal, I believe it is in the best interest of the City to proceed with the lowestproposal received from Patriot Range Technologies 7928 S. Madison Skeet, Burr Ridge, Illinois60527 in an amount not to exceed $253,707.50. This project will be funded by federal assetforfeiture monies and will have no impact on the 2010 City of Des Plaines budget.

AttachmentsCity Council Memorandum Requesting Shooting Range RFP (dated April 7, 2010)Vendor ProposalPurchase Order I Request for City Council Purchase ApprovalResolution

Consent Agenda Item #14

City of Des PlainesPolice Department

1420 Miner StreelDES PLAINES Des Plaines, IL 60016ILLINOISTel: 847-391-5400

Fax: 847-391-5463

MEMORANDUM

Date: April 7, 2010

To: Acting City Manag

Fom: Chief Jim Pran

Subj: Request for Proposal to cfurbish Police Shooting Range

Issue: The shooting range utilized by the Des Plaines Police Department is currently located on thesecond floor of the Public Works facility 1111 Campground Road. This memorandum will outlineour intention to refurbish the shooting range with the use of federal asset forfeiture monies that havebeen awarded to the City of Des Plaines.

Analysis: It is vitally important for the Des Plaines Police Department to have a shooting range atits disposal that is capable to handle weaponry that is carried by our officers during their tour ofduty. Twenty4our hour / day access is also required as most firearms training and qualifications areconducted during the officers’ shift.

There are several factors that have led to this decision to seek a Request for Proposal (RFP) torefurbish our shooting range. The current bullet trap is damaged beyond repair and bullet fragmentshave rebounded back towards officers on the shooting line. Ballistic curtains have been installed asa temporary solution to the problem. Additionally, our bullet trap does not accept rounds fired froma .223 patrol rifle that most officers on the department carry in addition to their duty handgun.Currently, separate range training days are needed at an outdoor range to allow for training andqualification for their patrol rifles.

Many other issues have surfaced under our current set up. The target carrier system is inoperableand officers are forced to walk downrange to shoot targets that are permanently fixed near the bullettrap. Also, the cunent ventilation system is antiquated and a new system is necessary to guaranteesale dispersal of contaminated air that is present during indoor fireams training Other upgrades tothe range control loom, weapons maintenance area and structural integrity of the range are includedin this RFP.

Ihe shooting range has needed repairs and upgrades for several years. It had been my intention tohavc a state of the art shooting range installed at a new police Facility in the future, however thereare no plans to proceed in that direction. lrom a risk management perspective, it is important tohave a sliooting niiige [hat can accept the ammunition used by the weapons our police officers areauthorized to carry, The overall safety of our olhcers is jeopardized in our current state of disrepairand this Request fti Proposal is needed to provide an immediate solution to the problems outlinedabove.

Recommendation: Use of furce training involving firearms is one of the most important aspects of001’ job as police olhccrs. Authonzation to proceed with this Request for Proposal to refUrbish ourshooting range is necessary at this time. All funding for this project will be macic from federal assetfbrfeiture fUnds and will not he reflecting in any budget funding authorized by the City of DesPlaines.

AttachmentRequest for Proposal

CITY OF DES PLAINESREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR AN

INDOOR FIREARMS TRAINiNG RANGE

SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION

The City of Des Plaines Police Department is seeking proposals from qualified vendorsto provide the complete services for the demolition/construction of an indoor firearmsrange, range control room, ventilation system, target carrier, and bullet trap system. Inaddition, a maintenance program shall be included in the proposal.

SECTiON 2. PREPARATION OF PROPOSAL

It is the responsibility of the vendor to carefully examine the specifications and proposaldocuments and to be familiar with all of the requirements, stipulations, provisions, andconditions surrounding the proposed services.

1. All costs incurred in the preparation, submission, and/or presentation of anyproposal including any proposal companies’ travel or personal expenses shall be the soleresponsibility of the vendor and will not be reimbursed by the city.

2. The vendor hereby affirms and states that the price quoted herein constitutesthe total cost to the city for all work involved in the respective items and that this costalso includes all insurance, royalties, transportation charges, use of all tools andequipment, superintendence, overhead expenses, all profit and all other work, services,and conditions necessarily involved in the work to be done and materials to be furnishedin accordance with the requirements of the contract documents considered severally andcollectively.

3. The vendor shall demonstrate to the Des Plaines Police Department that theyhave the expertise to design, build, and complete the entire firearms training range.

4. The vendor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and localregulations/licenses regarding demolition, removal, and construction of range project.

SECTION 3. MANDATORY MEETING

There will be a mandatory meeting at our range for all vendors submitting proposals onApril 29, 2010 at 10:00 AM. The purpose of this meeting is to meet with the rangecommittee for an on-site view of the range to assess and discuss what type of demolition,construction, the location of new equipment, and design that the project will entail. Therange is located on the second floor of our Public Works facility located at 1111Campground Rd. Des Plaines, IL. 60016.

1

SECTION 4. SCOPE OF WORK

Dernolitio1)crnolition work shall consist ofthc removal, cleaning, and proper disposal of, but notlimited to the following:Steel bullet trap, ceiling light cove deflectors, safety and drop ceilings, target systems,structures and related controls, duct work within the range area, sidewall steel panels,spray on acoustical material, tiles, drop ceiling grid, existing spent lead projectiles,shooters booths, and any related support structures, apparatus, or fixtures necessary tocomplete the demolition.

ConstructionThe new range design shall provide for the reconstruction of the range, range controlroom, closet, weapons maintenance area, lighting, and reconfiguration of ingress andegress to the range (details of the construction and reconfigurations can be obtained fromthe range committee members at the mandatory meeting)

Range Control RoomThe range control room shall be furnished with a master range control to provide all userfunctions of the target, range lighting, intercom, public address system, and rangeventilation systems. The console shall also have the ability to allow entry, editing,storage, and retrieval of courses of fire and officer’s shooting scores.

Ventilation SystemThe firing range ventilation system shall be a purge type system that discharges all of thesupplied air. The ventilation system shall be based upon the performance standards, asestablished by NIOSH, OSI-JA, and MIL-HDBK. The ventilation and environmentalcontrol system including ductwork, exhaust fans, filtration systems, etc. shall be installedin accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

Target Carrier/Rail SystemThe target deployment/retrieval system shall have the capability to transport the target todesired positions along the monorail. The target carrier shall have the capability to carrya target with a maximum weight often pounds and electrically turn to 0, 90, and 180degree facings. It shall be constructed with steel covers on all sides. The target railsystem shall be a cable less, wireless system. It shall be designed to handle all types ofsmall arms, as well as shotguns. The rail shall have no externally mounted hardware thatcan be destroyed during a course of fire.

Bullet Trap SystemThe bullet trap system shall utilize a granular rubber containment system. It shall havethe ballistic capability to handle all calibers up to and including the .223 caliber.

2

SECTION 5. PROPOSAL RESPONSE

Sealed envelopes containing five (5) copies of the proposal should be delivered to theCity Clerk’s Office, Room 602, 1420 Miner Street, Des Plaines, IL, 60016, rio later then3:00pm (local time), Friday, May 21, 2010. As soon as possible thereafter, the proposalswill be opened; however, award decisions will not be made at the opening.

Proposals must be typewritten and provided in hardcopy. Proposals submitted orally(either by telephone or in person), by facsimile, or via B-email will not be accepted.Include the following with your proposal:

1. Product literature describing how your product/solution meets the scope ofwork. If you provide multiple types of solutions, please provide informationon all relevant solutions the meet the specifications.

2. Additional product information that might be of interest relative to thespecifications listed above.

3. At least five (5) references describing where you have your product/solutionin an environment that is similar in size and complexity to the city’srequirements.

4. A brief description of how long your company has provided theproduct/solution.

5. Implementation lead times and schedule considerations.

6. Proximity to Municipality: The Municipality strongly prefers vendors withphysical presence in the State of Illinois to facilitate repairs and programmanagement, including but not limited to: calls for service, engineering andmaintenance issues, operation of equipment, troubleshooting, etc.

SECTION 6. REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS

The Chief of Police will designate a screening committee to review all proposals. Fromthis review up to three (3) applicants may be selected for a personal interview, in DesPlaines, IL, with the screening committee. Interviews, if required, will lastapproximately one (1) hour and will include detailed questions regarding methodology,qualifications, and relevant work experience.

Proposals shall be evaluated on the following criteria:

1. Process and methodology used in operating system.

2. Prior experience in performing similar work.

3. Estimated time to implement system.

3

4. Ability to communicate.

5. Cost.

The contract will be awarded to the proposal that, in the opinion of the screeningcommittee, Chief of Police, City Manager, and City Council, offers the best combinationof performance and price while meeting all required specifications.

The city reserves the right to waive any informality in any proposal and to delete certainitems listed in the proposal set forth herein.

This request for proposal does not commit the City of Des Plaines to award a contract, topay any costs incurred in the preparation of a proposal to this request or to procure acontract for services. All proposals submitted in response to this request for proposalshall become the property of the City of Des Plaines. The City of Des Plaines reservesthe right to accept or reject any or all proposals received as a result of this request, tonegotiate with qualified consultants, or to cancel in part or in its entirety the request forproposal, if it is determined to be in the best interest of the Municipality. The City mayrequire the proposer selected to participate in negotiations concerning contract price.

SECTION 7. CITY CONTACT INFORMATION

All questions regarding the requirements stated within this document should be directedto:

Officer Trent BeierTraining SectionDes Plaines Police Department1418 Miner StreetDes Plaines, IL. 60016(847) 391-5401

4

d. ••N.,,. •

I, s))\>.. :i

\. DES PLAIN E}

CITY OF DES PLAIN ES1420 MINER STREET

DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS 60016TELEPHONE: (847) 391-5300

PURCHASE ORDER()Hh Nb jWcoLINr NO OEI’ARTMFNT I l)IWI,ION VI NbII Nb VtJR(AV I,VL)EII F-Il

2082/1214 70140 Police 1214 JP62310

VENDOR NAME Patiio( Range Technologies sH

ATTN:

ADDRESS 7928 S. Madison Street P

T—-- -——________ 0

CITY, STATE, ZIP Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527

QUANTITY ITEM I DESCRIPTION UNIT COSI EXTENDED

One Demolition of police shooting range and installation of new bullet trap, target carriers, ventilation $253,707.50 $253,707.50system and range console electronics

SUB-TOTAL $25370750

SHIPPING I OTHER

TOTAL $253,707.50DATE REQUESTED BY OISR 5,’f °OVAL FJNMCL APPROJA. CITY MANAGER

06-23-10 Chief Jim rc j chief JhnPrandi1191

I OPP.j, IM.4i

‘w CITVOF .‘b

DES PLANES,HLLlNOI7

— - Request for City Council Purchase Approval IDATE: June ? 2010

DEPARTMENT: Police

[)EPARTMENT (‘ODE: 1214 ACCOUNT CODE: 2082

‘I’OTAL COST OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE $253707.50_Asset Forfeiture Account Expenditure

TOTAL AMOUNT BUDGETED N/A

____ ______________ _______ ______

OTHER PROJECTCOSTS_NjA__ .--—--_____

_____ _______

(if applicable)

ONGOING OPERATING COSTS:

_____-__________________

(if applicable)

THIS PURCHASE AND OTHER PROJECT COSTS ARE EXPECTED TO REMAIN WITHIN THE BUDGET:

REQUESTED BY Chief Jim Prandini CITY MANAGER

City of Des Plaines1420 Miner Street

Des Plaines, IL 60016Ph: (847) 391-5300

ITEM OR SERVICE TO BEPURCI-IASED —

Demolition of police shooting range / installation of bullet trap, ventilation system, target carriers, range console

SUMMARY OF BIDS OR QUOTES

Patriot Range-$253,707.50 / Carey’s Action Target-$345,81 5 / Meggitt Training-$438,61 1.02 / Advancedlnteractive-$2,461 573

__________________________________________________________________________

CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED

J Approval of Lowest Responsible Bidder

WAIVE FORMAL BID PROCEDURES - SELECT ALL THAT APPLY

fl Emergency Purchase Equipment Standardization

Joint Government Purchasing Program Sole Supplier

Professional Services Consulting fl Technical Nature of Item Makes Competition Impossible

Other

SUMMARY

Request approval for quote offered by Patriot Range Technologies 7928 S. Madison St. Burr Ridge, IL 60527

[)EPARTMENT HEAD FINANCE DIRECTOR

CITY OF DES PLAINES


A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TIlE CITY TO ACCEPTTHE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE PROPOSAL FROMPATRIOT RANGE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC FOR TIlEREFURBISHMENT OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENTSHOOTING RANGE AT A TOTAL COST OF $253,707.50.

WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 197() Illinois Constitution authorizes the Cityto contract with individuals, associations and corporations, in any manner not prohibited by lawor ordinance; and

WHEREAS, the Police Department sent out a Request for Pioposals for therefurbishment of the Police Department’s shooting range and thur vendors responded; and

WHEREAS, Patriot Range Technologies, LLC submitted the lowest responsibleproposal for the refurbishment of the Police Department’s shooting range at a cost not to exceed$253,707.50; and

Wi-IEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept the proposal submitted byPatriot Range Technologies, LLC for the refurbishment of the Police Department’s shootingrange at a cost not to exceed $253,707.50 and to authorize the Director of Finance, or herdesignee, to issue payment to Patriot Range Technologies, LLC in an amount not to exceed$253,707.50 for the refurbishment of the Police Department’s shooting range;



SECTION 1: That the recitals set forth herein above are incorporated herein by

reference as the factual basis for this transaction.

SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby accepts the proposal submitted by Patriot

Range Technologies, LLC for the refurbishment of the Police Department’s shooting range at a

cost not to exceed $253,707.50 and authorizes the Acting City Manager to execute the contract

documents.


designee, to issue payment to Patriot Range Technologies, LLC, 7928 S. Madison Street, Burr

Ridge, Illinois 60527, for the refurbishment of the Police Department’s shooting range in an

amount not to exceed $253,707.50, upon receipt of invoice and approval of work completed.

SECTION 4: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect fiom and after its


PASSED this day of , 2010.

APPROVED this

______

day of , 2010.


MAYOR


__________________

Li /C ) iLCITY CLERK David R. Wiltse, City Attorney

Legal\Res\2() O\Shoo(ing Range Refurbishment Patriot Range Technologies

2

DES PLAINES POLICEPROJECT

FIREAR1VIS TRAINING RANGE

PREPARED FOR:

Des Plaines Police Department1420 Miner Street

Des Plaines, IL 60016

PREPARED BY:

Patriot Range Technologies7928 S. Madison StreetBurr Ridge, IL 60527

A PRT Company

Quote i PRTDPD-4-002 hUN

May 21, 2010

PROPRIETARY NOTICE

l’his proposal or quotation includes Patriot Range Technologies, a subsidiary of PRT Logistic services LLC. proprietary data that shallnot be disclosed outside the Des Plaines Police Department, or The City of Des Plaines, Illinois and shall not be duplicated, used, ordisclosed — in whole, or in part — for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal or quotation. lf however, a contract is awardedto this offerer or quoter as a result of— or in conjunction with — the submission of this data, the Des Plaines Police Department & TheCity of Des Plaines, Illinois shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contractThis restriction does not limit the City’s right to use infonnation contained in this data if it is obtained from another source withoutrestriction. The data stibject to the restriction are contained in this entire docunsent

PRTDPD-4-002 1JUNMay 21,20i0

Overview

Patriot Range Technologies is proposing to provide the complete services for the construction of thecomplete indoor firearms range control room, target, and ventilation system equipment. We are proposingour equipment, which remains, the absolute latest in technology available for live fire basic, advanced,and ultra advanced police firearms training. Patriot Range Technologies has developed the world’s onlycompletely wire-less and cable-less monorail type target system.

As the world leader in live fire training systems, Patriot Range Technologies has taken the opportunity todevelop product that is the direct result of the needs, or desires, of specific users world wide.

PAGE2OF 12

USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CON [AINED ON THIS PAGE IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON IHE liT LFPAGE OF TillS DOCUMENT.

PRTDPD-4-002 IJUNMay 21,2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES IDes Plaines Police Department 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 601)16 IPatriot Range Technologies

INDOOR FIREARMS RANGE TECHNICAL SECTION 4DEMOLITION 4

D.I.I Arch/wall 4D.1.2Arch/wall/trap 4D.2.1 Equip/Target 4D.3. I Mech. / 1-IVAC I range 4D.3.2 Mech. / l-IVAC / main bldg 4

CONSTRUCTION 4C.I.l Arch/wall/window 4C.1.2 Arch / wall! door 4C. 1.3 Arch / wall / armor 5

VENTILATION SYSTEM 5Operation 5Performances .5

Operat ion specifics 6Duct Specifics 6Flow specifics 6

Contractor Representations: 6Make up air unit 6Exhaust Fan unit 6Filtration 7DDC Control 7

TARGET CARRIER & RAIL SYSTEM 7Target Turning 7Target carrier construction 7Target lighting 8Target carrier drive 8Target rail 8Rail uses 8Target carrier control &fiinction 8

Local Control 9Master Control: 9Infra-Red Remote Control 10

Range Control Systems 10Lighting control panel 10Intercom System 10Public address system 10

Detail Range control room 11Cost Proposals 12EQUIPMENT LISTING AS FOLLOWS (schedule l): 12

PAGE 3 OF 12

USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED ON TI-uS PAGE IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE TITLEPAGE OF TFIIS DOCUMENT.

INDOOR FIREARMS RANGE TECHNICAL SECTION

PRTDPD-4-002 I JIJNMay 21, 2010

Patriot Range Technologies ‘technical approach to the Indoor Firearms Range incorporates state-of-the-art wire-less monorail and computer control technologies that are technologically superior to all otherexisting systems.

Patriot proposes to work from the currentdesignated firearms range area of the building.We will create the necessary plans for the indoorrange demolition & construction of the fiveposition range.

Patriot will assume fiji! responsibility for thecomplete design of all related live fire areas.

Our proposal is intended to provide The DesPlaines Police Department with an all inclusiveand finished live fire range system.

The details and scopes of the proposed projectare as follows:

DEMOLITIONP.1.1 Arch I wall

The west wail of the range will requiredemolition of the range control room toaccommodate new control room and ingress /egress systems configuration.

P.1.2 Arch I wall / trap

The north wall of the range near the trap willrequire demolition of a 42” wide section to thehallway. Overall height of section will be 9’.This will accommodate placement of lateraltarget system.

P.2.1 Equip / Target

The entire target system of the range will beremoved and disposed of Target systems includemonorail tracks, carriers, un-usable mountingclamps, and motor drive units. The electricalcurrently used by the existing target system will

be disconnected and then reused. This is in ourscope of work.

D.3.1 Mech. / HVAC I range

The existing mechanical system for the rangeventilation is not capable of performing asrequired by NIOSH recommendations. Theentire supply (make up air) and exhaust (EFunit) will be removed.

P.3.2 Mech. / HVAC / main bldg

The existing ductwork of the main buildingHVAC is currently routed through sections ofthe range, range hallway, and armory. It is ourintention of removing the duct sections that willinterfere with any proper range duct placement.

CONSTRUCTION

C.1.1 Arch / wall / window

The new range design provides for thereconstruction of the range control room. Thenew control room configuration provides anarrower control center, but creates a greaterready / staging area on the range. The rangecontrol center provides a level # 3 ballisticcompliance by means of filled concrete block(8” x 16” CMU) and rated 3’ X 5’ window.

C.1.2 Arch I wall I door

The new range design provides for ballisticingress and egress to the range. The “in” doorwill actually be comprised of two doors. Thecurrent ‘rn door will remain in place. We willinstall a new entrance door where the hallwayturns 90 degrees to the range entrance hallway.

PAGE 4012

USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMAFION CONTAiNED ON THIS PAGE IS SUBJECrTo THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE TITLEPAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT.

PR! [)PD-4-002 I JUNMay 21, 2010

The exit side of the range will have a newballistic door as first exit point. There will be anew wall constructed at rear wall of’range tocontinue the new control room wall. Theexisting exit door will remain.

The current side—space of the range (area next toentrance door) will be cleared of all ductwork.New wall and door will be installed in opening,creating a new range storage closet.

(See attached detail RF-02)

C.1.3 Arch / wall / armor

The new opening in the north wall will requirean armor backing plate on the hallway side. Thebacking plate will provide a protection level of 4(high powered rifle). Trap side of backing platewill provide 30-degree wall mounted deflector.Deflector will redirect all rounds back intorange trap area. (See detailA-J)

VENTILATION SYSTEM

The proposed ventilation system for the range isa purge type system that discharges all of thesupplied air. The inlet air is supplied to therange, with or without heat, and is utilized forthe duration that is the elapsed time fromintroduction source to the exhaust system

(appox. 85 seconds). Our system is proposedwith our radial diffuser plenum assembly.

Operation

Our proposed system will maintain the desiredrange pressure of -. 025” negative relativepressure to the adjoining spaces. The supply airis fixed to constantly deliver the design volume.The exhaust is designed to extract as much asten percent more volume than the supply candeliver. The Exhaust however is modulatedthrough its inlet vane damper. The inlet vanedamper is controlled by the Direct l)igitalControl system.

The design of the proposed system has beenproven to adhere to all written and otherimplied health and safety issues. Rangetechaffirms that it has successfully designed andconstructed at least thirty (30) other completeindoor firing range ventilation systems thatadhere to the State Industrial Hygiene for leadexposure. (Third party testing lab verificationto this fact is available).

Performances

The range ventilation system is based upon theperformance standards, as established byNIOSH.

The performance intent for firing rangeventilation systems shall meet all therequirements outlined as recommendations anddesign considerations in HEW publication no.(NIOSH) 76-130 dated December 1975entitled “Lead Exposure Design Considerationsfor Indoor Firing Ranges”. This designstandard prefers an air flow velocity of 75 feetper minute average on the empty range. Thisdesign has consistently provided compliancewithin the established federal standards forairborne inorganic lead concentration limits.When properly installed, lead concentrationsare consistently maintained below the actionlevel of 30 micrograms per cubic meter in anarea where the limit shall not exceed 50micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air overa time weighted average of eight hours asmeasured at the respiration zone of the shooters

DET A-I

I it’’ 1

tI I- I LL,t IILI El

H /

/,

Hi’I I

r 1

PAGE 5 OF 12

USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CON’rAINED ON THIS PAGE iS SUBJECT TO TIlE RESTRICTIONS ON THE TITLEPAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT.

PRTDPD-4-002 1 JUNMay21, 2010

and the range officer when firing from thefiring booths per OSHA 29 CFR. 1910.1025and 1926.62.

The ideal airflow is designated as Iaininai; oreven flow. This is construed as an air supplythat has only slight velocity variation, whenmeasured from ceiling to floor. This velocityvariation cannot exceed 15%. In order toachieve this desired airflow certain airdistribution systems must be constructed. Theprimary goal is to provide the proper cubic footvalue of air to the range through the supplytrunk duct. The air is then distributed through acontinuous graduated plenum to the diffusersystem. The diffuser system configuration willprovide for an even flow of air across the widthand height of the range.

Operation specifics

The ventilation system control is a direct digitalwith a modem link. Our people are able tomonitor, diagnose, and create maintenancescopes, without visiting the site. This isconsidered standard to our proposal.

Duct Specifics

The supply duct will be a roof-mounted plenumthat provides five distribution points throughthe cored holes of the roof. Exterior duct willbe insulated against heat loss.

The exhaust duct system is incorporated withinthe overhead baffle (redirective guard) systemof the bullet trap and is constructed in a fashionthat evenly extracts the supply air from therange. Our experience in this matter has been tocreate an extraction opening the width of therange and capable of sustaining an inlet, orcapture, velocity of 2000 feet per minute.

We intend to reuse the current exhaust ductopening through the roof. We intend to installnew equipment on designated curbs & rails onthe roof and to properly place all equipment.New equipment placement involves filteringthe air under negative pressure conditions,thereby eliminating potential breach and fancontamination.

Flow specifics

The exhaust fan and filter system will bedesigned to allow for 350 to 500 fprn velocitiesacross the filter media. The exhaust fan will besized so as to allow for operational staticpressure at 5 inches wag at the desired volumeof airflow. The filter media will be that of atleast 65% ASHREA. This will help achieve theUnited States Federal exhaust emission levelsestablished under EPA 40 CFR 50.12 (1.5Micrograms ofleadper cubic meter quarterly).

The proposed system exceeds any of the latestCALOSHA specification pertaining to

permissible exposure and Action levels.

Contractor Representations:

Rangetech International Corporation Maintainsthat in addition to having completed amultitude of municipal ranges, Rangetech hassuccessfully completed a multitude militaryfiring range ventilation systems that meetUnited States Navy, or United States AirForce compliance under the military handbookMIL-HJJBK, Firing Range VentilationSystems Performance SEC 1 027/3B revision #1, dated July, 1995.

Make up air unit

Rangetech proposes to install one exteriormake-up air unit with direct-fired gas heat. TheUnit is capable of delivering 12,000 cubic feetper minute of air @2.5 inches of total staticeach. The heat will be gas direct fired with acapable heat rise of ninety (90) degrees.

Exhaust Fan unit

We propose to install two exhaust fan units thatare capable of extracting 13,200 cubic feet perminute 7 inches of total static pressure. Thefan will have an inlet vane damper thatregulates the extraction volume relative to the“on range” pressure.

PAGE 6 OF 12

USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED ON TFIIS PAGE IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE TITLEPAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT.

PRTDPD-4-002 1 JUNMay 21, 2010

Filtration

The ventilation system utilizes a two-stagefilter system that operates with a final stage of

filtration at 95% efficiencies. Both filter stagesare outfitted with differential static pressuregauges and transducers for local inspection andDirect Digital Control, (DDC), interaci ion.

DDC Control

The proposed ventilation control system is aDDC type system that controls all fans, rangepressures and system interlocking. All filterpressures are displayed at operation screen onthe DDC control unit. The Direct DigitalControl system (DDC) modulates the exhaustthrough monitoring the on-range pressure.

TARGET CARRIER & RAIL SYSTEM

Monorail target deployment / retrieval systemwill have capabilities to transport target todesired positions along the monorail. Desiredpositions are registered in increments of feet.The desired position can be any one of theregistered increments selected by the operator.The position can be anywhere along themonorail from one foot to the furthest footdistance at the end of the rail. The target carrierwill have the capabilities to carry a target witha maximum weight of up to five kilograms andelectrically turn this target to 90 and 180degrees from 0 degrees. The target turningfunction has three positions, friend, edge andfoe facing.

Target Turning

The target turning assembly will be capable ofturning a target of up to ten lbs to all 0, 90, and1 80-degree facings. The speed at which thistarget can turn from edge to either face is .4, orfour tenths of a second. The target holdingmechanism is a spring clamp devise that permitseasy target installation by the user. The targetclamp is constructed of AR 400 .250” steel with30 degree deflection from monorail horizon of 0degrees. The target clamp provides a 6-inchwide target support grip. The target shall besupported at the top horizontally by at least 5inches within the clamp mechanism.

Target carrier construction

The target carrier will be constructed with steelcovers on all sides. The front impact plate is a.25 0” AR 400 hardened steel. The impactplate provides a 30 degree downwarddeflection in relation to the monorail horizon of0 degrees. The sides, bottom and rear ofcarrier are covered with metal facing thatcompletely conceals all electrical inner

PAGE 7 OF 12

USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMAFION CON’IAINED ON THIS PAGE IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE TITLEPAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT

PRTDPD-4-002 1JUNMay 21, 2010

workings of the carrier. None of the electricalneeded internally lbr the target carrier functionwill be obtained via an externally mountedenergy collector. All energy collector devisesare mounted internally to the target carrier. Inother words, all energy collector devise areprotected by being an internal componentwithin the protective body of the target carrier.This assures the intended reliability to thetarget carrier function.

The metal facing is capable of withstandinghandgun bullet strikes at angles of up to 35degrees to the metal surface, without breach.

Target lighting

The target carrier has an internal on board lightsource specifically for the purpose ofilluminating the target it carries. This on boardlight source travels with the target carrier to allof the target stops. It is properly armored sothat the light cannot be damaged in any wayfrom customary firearms activity on the range.The light source has variable light intensitiesthat are controlled at both the local or mastercontrol.

Target carrier drive

The target carrier is propelled by a drive motorthat is internally mounted within the carrier.Electrical requirements of the drive motor, theon board target light, and all other electricaldevises within the carrier adhere to therequirements of the National Electric Code

Target rail

Target carrier rail system has a design. that hasno motors or controllers mounted at rail head.The starting end of the rail has no obstructiongreater than 25 square inches

The rail unit has no cables, wires or movingparts of any kind. The rail unit has no physicalattachment to target carrier unit. The rail unitis constructed in a manner that prevents anydebris from accumulating within the rail.Specifically, the rail is not open on the top side.The rail unit is ballistically designed to preventbreaching from underside of rail as well Inother words, the underside of rail is constructedwithout any horizontal surfaces. The target railalso serves as the energy and informationconduit to the target carrier.

Rail uses

The rail unit is designed so as to permitextensive use by all types of small arms, aswell as shotguns. Specifically, the rail will notpermit debris accumulation within the rail. Therail has no externally mounted hardware thatcan be destroyed, or “shot off” during a courseof fire.

Target carrier control & function

The target carrier can be controlled by both alocal (ML-lane) control and by a master control(Master Range Control MRC ) console. Eachone has the capabilities to operate the targetsystem carrier units in manual or in programmodes.

PAGE8OF 12

USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS PAGE IS SUBJECI’ TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE TITLEPAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT.

PRTDPD-4-0021 JUNMay 21, 2010

Local Control

The local control is single lane operator calledthe ML-213 interface. It serves to execute allperformance and operational capabilities of thelane that it serves, The lane controller allowsuser at the lane to operate manually, or underthe ML’s own program. Specifically, manualoperation means that the user of a single lanemay move that lane’s single target carrier toanyplace along the rail, operate target turning,and target light function manually. Programfunction allows user to activate any of the preprogrammed profiles. Profiles can beprogrammed from the local control and savedto that controller’s rnemoiy.

The local control has a membrane type keypadand is both operated, and programmed byfunction icons on the keypad. The functionicons clearly display that key’s intendedfunction and the icon is clearly identifiable.The operational display is in full text form anddoes not utilize confusing abbreviations.Programs may also be programmed at themaster console and downloaded to the localcontrol, see Master Range Control.

The Master Range Control MRC is the mastertarget system operator interface. It can controlall user functions of the target, range lightingand range ventilation systems. It can control thetarget systems iii a manual mode, or in aprogram (profile) mode. The MRC has thecapabilities to select or deselect lanes ofoperation, lock out lanes from local use,activate desired lanes to perform manuallyexecuted or programmed functions.

The MRC is also capable of executing wavetype programs (voice) that have beenprerecorded in the MRC.

MRC: The Master Range Control is acomputer. It has processing capabilities of 1 .5Ghz Pentium or ADM with 2 G of randomaccess memory and a 40-G hard driveminimum.

The operator display is Windows XPProfessional format.

The display details all function, status, andactivity of each target system as arepresentative graphic icon form. The displayto the user exhibits a full color facsimile ofeach lane target carrier with its current status(facing, distance, light intensity, running mode,and time remaining) in real time.

Master Control:

PAGE 9 OF 12

USE OR DiSCLOSURE OF FNFORMATION CONTA[NED ON THIS PAGE IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE TITLEPAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT.

PRTDPD-4-002 1 JUNMay 21,2010

Infra-Red Remote Control:

The Master Range Control MRC has a remotecontrol function interface capability that linksthe MRC function keys ( F-Keys) to a smallhand held Infra-Red remote control The Infrared Control unit has a twelve functiontransmitter keypad. This keypad is the remotelink to each function key on the MRC keyboard.

The Infra Red unit allows range control fromoutside the range control room. Functions canbe simple target facings, distances, lightintensities, auxiliary devices, sounds, profiles,etc...

The maximum transmission range of the remoteis over 100 feet from the receiver unit.

Range Control Systems

Important peripheral systems for range control,communication, and lighting are listed in thefollowing

Lighting control panel

The range lighting is controlled by a six bankdimmer panel that can he wall or tablemounted.

Panel is equipped to dim each lighting row onebank at a time. Panel is also equipped withisolated communications port, suitable forintercom system.

Intercom System

The intercom system utilizes our lane controlfaceplates for housing and protecting the localspeaker / microphone & call button. The callbutton at the lane is a prison tested, high impactexplosion proof aluminum case with compositebutton. It is guaranteed for life!The lane speaker has an 8-ohm voice coil thatis resistant to firearms sound concussion.(See local control detail)

Master intercom panel is a 12-volt DC poweredindividual port two-way communication device.The master intercom panel controls all volumefor each lane speaker! microphones.

Master intercom also has a hail all feature as analternate.

Public address system

Range P/A system is a single 30 watt unit withtwo speaker horns. P/A is tied into MasterRange Console. This allows use of MRC wavefile systems.

I,mINTERCOM SWITCHES

PAGE 1012

USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED ON TI-US PAGE IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE TITLEPAGE OF TFIIS DOCUMENT.

P/A has dual inputs for additional microphones,

wireless, etc...

Detail Range control room


HEl

7/

/

ClP1

‘1—1Cl

ClP1

PAGE ii OF 12

USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS PAGE IS SUBJEC1’ TO TFIE RESTRICTIONS ON THE TITLEPAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT.


Cost Proposals

We herewith offer our quotation for furnishing, delivering and supervising the installation of sixlanes of range target, trap and ventilation system equipment. This quotation excludes costs forPayment and Performance Bonds, Permits, and any Taxes. All work proposed would be done inaccordance with all specifications, drawings and addenda, if any.

Patriot Range 1èchnologies allows terms of 100% net 30 days to all Governmental Agencies.Different term’s can/may be arranged, in writing, and signed by all parties.

Delivery is usually 30-75 days after we receive an approved shop package, or Purchase Order,which ever is later. A variance in delivery and installation schedules can be made dependingupon the customer’s desires.

This Quotation must be attached to, and made part of, any forthcoming Purchase Order

Thank you for the opportunity to submit this quotation.

Sincerely,

Patriot Range Technologies

Thomas M. Corcoran

President

Approved:

___________________________________

Date:

_________________

EQUIPMENT LISTING AS FOLLOWS (schedule 1):

PAGE 12 OF 12

USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS PAGE IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE TITLEPAGE OF TillS DOCUMENT,

SCHEDULE OF PRICES (Desplaines, IL)

4Range remodel 5/21/2010

____________________

PART I (To be completed by contractor)

I ACTIVITY AND LOCATION

Desolaines Police2. TITLE OF CONTRACT AND SITE LOCATION

Small arms range complete QUOTE A PRTDPD-3-OO2IJUN

3. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

Patriot Range TechnologIes 7928 S. MADISON Burr RIdge, IL 60527 (708) 354-3150

7 ALLOTMENT OR ALLOCATION NO. IR APPROPRIATION TITLE

2 . ITEM Submittal QIJANTITIES A. MATERIAL COST o. LABOR COST

NO Item # b DESCRIPTION OF ITEM NOOF — UNIT COST COST UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST

UNITS UNIT

Al.) design Architectural & Design BA 500.00 500.00 2500.00 2,500.00 3,000.00ME.1.i design Mechanical Engineering i BA 750.00 750.00 4500.00 4500.00 5250.00

A 1.2 demo TRAP REMOVAL I BA 450.00 450.00 800.00 800.00 1250.00

demo DEMOLITIONIHVAC) i EA 150.00 150.00 000.00 900.00 1,050.00

B 1.1-2 SERVICE CLEANUP )ENVIRONMENTAL) EXISTING BULLET TRAP - I EA 450.00 500.00 900.00 900.00 1400.00

E 1.3 SERVICE DEMO I DISPOSAL OF EXISTING TRAP IENVIRONMENTALI 1 EA 300.00 300.00 200.00 200.00 500.00c.i.1 Construction RANGECONTROLROOM i BA 2,300.00 2,300.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 4,100.00C.l.2 Construction RANGECONTROLROOM 1 BA 8,900.00 8,900.00 650.00 650.00 9,550.00

RE 1.1 ENV-SPPT ENVIROSTOP 6 BA 880.00 5,280.00 300.00 1,800.00 7,080.00

RE 1.1 S-TRAP-BAF-250 3ODEGREETRAP EAFFLEIAR 405) 20 LF 560.00 11,200.00 105.00 2,100.00 13,300.00

RE 1.2 SIDEWALLS SIDEWALLS 20 LF 34.00 680.00 56.00 1,120.00 1,800.00RE 1.3 GRANULAR GRANULAR MEDIA 20 LF 500.00 10,000.00 168.00 3,360.00 13,360.00

E10-2.2.3 Construction SAWCUTTING 1 SA 508.00 508.00 750.00 750.00 1,268.00B10-2.2.3 Construction ARM0RSTEEL 3 BA 755.00 2265.00 500.00 1,500.00 3,765.00ElO- 2.2.4 Construction RUNNING MAN SYSTEM MULTI LANE I BA 5400.00 5,400.00 200.00 200.00 5,600.00

CW-TILE Construction WALLPANELS(RUBBER) 1150 SF 7.74 8901.00 9.00 10,350.00 19,251,00CW-IOG Construction TENGAUGEWALLPANELS 1150 SF 2.11 2,426.50 4.00 4,600.00 7,026.50

CW-NCWM Construction NON.COMPLYTAJOOD&FRAME 1160 SF 0.90 1035.00 1.20 1,380.00 2,415.00050 / Em Electrical RANGE SYSTEM LIGHTING (INCANDESCENTS) 1 BA 1,245.00 1245.00 3,200.00 3,200.00 4,445.00

050/ ElO Electrical RANGE READYAREALIGHTING (FLOURESCENTS) 4 — BA 138.00 552.00 186.00 744.00 1,296.00

BID- 2.2.3 Range equipment SHOOTING STALLASSEMBLIES 5 BA 1,145.00 5,725.00 60.00 300.00 6,025.00

E10-2.2.3 Range equipment SHOOTINGSTALLBARRICADES 5 BA 125.00 625.00 45.00 225.00 850.00E10-2.2.3 Range equipment SHOOTINGSTALLTAELES 5 BA 132.00 660.00 46.00 225.00 885.00

E1o-2.2.3 Range equipment SHOOTINGSTALLCONTROLBOXES 5 BA 45.00 225.00 45.00 225.00 450.00El 0- 2.2.4 Range equipment TARGET SYSTEMS MULTI LANE 5 BA 4,700.00 23,500.00 200.00 1,000.00 24500.00

El0-2.2.4 Range equipment TARGETSYSTEMSMASTER(MULTI.LANE) 1 — EA 1,800.00 1,800 00 350.00 350.00 2,150.00

D503.5 Communications INTERCOMLANEUNITS 5 BA 81.00 405.00 35.00 175.00 580.00050 3.5 Communications INTERCOM MAsTER 1 BA 320.00 320.00 125.00 125.00 445.00

D50 3.5 Communications PUeLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM MASTER 1 — BA 475.00 475.00 65.00 65.00 540.000603.5 Communications PUELICADLIRESSSYSTEMSPEAKERHORNS I — BA 165.00 165.00 65.00 66.00 230.00

RE 10.0 10.0-12.3 EXHFANI3,[email protected] I — BA 13,692.00 13,692.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 15,192.00

RE 10.0 10.0-12.3 EXHAUSTFANTESTING 1 BA - - 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00RE 10.0 10.0-10.1 MAKEUPAURUNIT,WITHHEAT,12,005CFM 1 BA 19,750.00 19,750.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 21,250.00RE 10,0 10.0-10.1 MAXEUPAURUNITTEST 1 BA - - 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00

RE 10.0 10.0-10.3 VARIA5LE FREQUENCY DRIVE UNIT (EXHAUST) 1 BA 1,450.00 1,460.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 2,650.00

RB 10.0 10.0-10.3 DOC CONTROL SYSTEM 1 BA 11450.00 11,450.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 15,950.00RE 10.0 10.0-10,3 DDC CONTROL SYSTEM TEST 1 BA - - 800.00 800.00 800.00

RE 10.0 10.0-10.3 SUPPLYDUCTFITTINGS 11 BA 475.00 5,225.00 525.00 5,775,00 11,000.00

RE 10.0 10.0-10.3 SUPPLYCROSSOVERS 12 BA 88.00 1,056.00 125.00 1,500.00 2,656.00

RE 15.0 15.0-15.3 OFFICE HVAC SYSTEM 1 BA 7,800.00 7,800.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 10,800.00

RE 10.0 10.0-10.1 INSULATION 1 EA 2,350.00 2,350.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 4,750.00

RE 10.0 10.0-10.1 GAS PIPING 1 EA 800.00 800.00 1,147.00 1,147.00 1,947.00

RE 10.0 10.0-10.1 EXHAUST DUCTFITTINGS 8 BA 675.00 5,400.00 732.00 5,856.00 11,256.00

RE 10.0 1 0.0-10.1 EXHAUST FILTER ENCLOSURE 1 BA 2,580.00 2,580.00 750.00 750.00 3,330.00RE 10.0 10.0-12.8 95% PILTER S BA 88.00 704.00 28.00 224.00 928.00

RE 10.0 10.0-12.6 PREFILTER3O% 8 BA 16.00 12800 23.00 184.00 312.00RE 10.0 10.0-10.1 RADIALDIFFUSERPLENUMSEC’IIONS 6 EA 897.00 4,48500 150.00 750.00 5,235.00

IEQUIPMENT TOTAL I I 174,112.50253,707.50

Page 1

SCHEDULE OF PRICES (Desplaines, IL)

4Range remodel 5/21/2010

PART I (To be completed by contractor)

I. ACTIVITY AND LOCAEON

Desplaines Police2. TITLE OF CONTRACT AND SITE LOCATION

Small arms range complete ()IJOTN II PRlDl’D-3-OO2IJUN

3 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

Patriot Range Technologies 7928 S. MADISON Burr Ridge, IL 60527 (708) 354-3150

7 ALLOTMENT OR ALLOCATION NO APPROPRIATION TITLE

12, ITEM Submittal . OUANTITIES d. MATERIAL COST e. LABOR COST

NO Item # b. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM NO. OP UNIT COST COST UNIT COST COST TOTAL COST

UNITS UNIT

LABOR TOTAL 79,595.00SALES TAX ON MATERIAL 0.00%

1J0B TOTAL I I 253,707.50 I

Page 2

Key Design and Construction Experience: Range Contractor

In this section, we present inlbrmation required of the contractor, Patriot Range Technologies, who willbe responsible for Desplaines police firing range. ‘l’he solicitation requests a listing of at least five rangesof similar type that meet and meeting N JOSH and ETL ventilation requirements. Below, we summarizePatriot Range Technologies’ participation in I 0 such firing ranges.

Patriot Range Technologies Range Ventilation Experience Summary

Location # lanes Control System I Range Attributes Patriot Owner Design Criteriawidth Contact

USNRTCGreat Lakes, Ill 160’

Johnson Metsys intercontrolled variable exhaustvolume by pressure relation of range to adjacentspace Steam heat with air/air energy exchanger.

Air delivery by our Radial Diffuser system.12/23/2000 airflow preliminary readings measuredairflows average 75 fpm with high extreme at 86fpm and low extreme at 57 fpm.Range was accepted by NAVFACENGCOM Code15 W.R Gibbings

ThomasCorcoran708-354-3150

U.S. NavyU.S.S Wisconsin# 7315 Great Lakes,IL 60088847-688-5661

MIL/HNDBK 1027UFC 4 160-01ETL 06-11NIOSH 76-1 30CFR4O

NASPAX 16 Johnson Metsys intercontrolled variable exhaust Thomas U.S. Navy - MIUHNDBK 1027Patuxent River, 72’ volume by pressure relation of range to adjacent Corcoran 21876 Cuddihy Road UFC 4 160-01MD space. Direct fired gas heat only. 708-354- # 2624 ETL 06-11

3150 Patuxent River, MD NIOSH 76-1 30Air delivery by our Radial Diffuser system. 20670 CFR 403/20/2002 airflow preliminary readings measured 301 342-5151airflows average 75 fpm with high extreme at 82fpm and low extreme at 61 fpm.Range was accepted by NAVFACENGCOM Code15 W.R Gibbings

FWPSC 18 Niagara JACE Multi function programmable Thomas City of Fort Wayne MILJHNDBK 1027Fort Wayne, IN 75’ Delivery volume control for pressure drop control Corcoran 7602 Patriot Crossing UFC4 160-01

over HEPA& recirculation air system w/ air/air 708-354- Fort Wayne, IN 46816 ETLO6-11energy recovery. Hot water & solar heat with 3150 260-427-5568 NIOSH 76-130chilled water cooling -LEED Certified. CFR 40

LEEDAir delivery by our Radial Diffuser system.10/15/2008 airflow preliminary readings measuredairflows average 75 fpm with high extreme at 81fpm and low extreme at 62 fpm.Range was accepted by Personnel safety &hygiene office of the Fort Wayne PSTC.

NDW 7 Johnson Metsys intercontrolled variable exhaust Thomas U.S. Navy MIL/HNDBK 1027Washington DC 28’ volume by pressure relation of range to adjacent Corcoran 21876 Cuddihy Road UFC 4 160-01

space. Direct fired gas heat only. 708-354- # 2624 ETL 06-1 13150 Patuxent River, MD NIOSH 76-1 30

Air delivery by our Radial Diffuser system. 20670 CFR 406/15/1998 airflow preliminary readings measured 301 342-5151airflows average 75 fpm with high extreme at 84fpm and low extreme at 55 fpm.Range was accepted by NAVFACENGCOM Code15 W.R Gibbings

NNSY 10 Johnson Metsys intercontrolled variable exhaust Thomas U.S. Navy MIL/HNDBK 1027Porstmouth, VA 40’ volume by pressure relation of range to adjacent Corcoran Bldg 1502 Code UFC 4 160-01

space. Direct fired gas heat only. 708-354- NO3PT ETL 06-113150 Portsmouth, VA 23709 NIOSH 76-130

Air delivery by our Radial Diffuser system. (757) 396-2448 CFR 408/04/2000 airflow preliminary readings measuredairflows average 75 fpm with high extreme at 84fpm and low extreme at 60 fpm.Range was accepted by NAVFACENGCOM Code15W.R Gibbings

Johnson Metsys intercontrolled variable exhaustvolume by pressure relation of range to adjacentspace. Direct fired gas heat only

Air delivery by our Radial Diffuser system.7/10/2001 airflow preliminary readings measuredairfiows average 75 fpm with high extreme at 81fpm and low extreme at 59 fpm.Range was accepted by NAVFACENGCOM Code15 W.R Gibbings

Air delivery by our Radial Diffuser system. Test &balance conducted by United Test & Balance on5/16/2002. Preliminary & final airflow readinaverage 75 fpm. With high velocity extreme atfpm and low extreme at 62 fpm. Written reportsummary accepted by and filed with HuiValley building dept and Chagrin Falls Fire S;Commission.

U.S. NavyBldg 3137 Small ArmsRange32nd Street StationSan Diego, CA 92136619-556-1835

32nd street 8San Diego, CA 32

Location # lanes Control System I Range Attributes Patriot Owner Design Criteriawidth Contact

ThomasCorcoran708-354-3150

MIL/HNDBK 1027UFC 4 160-01ETL 06-IlNIOSH 76-1 30CFR 40

USNA 16 Johnson Metsys intercontrolled variable exhaust Thomas U.S. Navy MILIHNDBK 1027Annapolis, MD 56’ volume by pressure relation of range to adjacent Corcoran Bancroft Hall UFC 4 160-01

space. Steam heat. 708-354- Annapolis, MD 21402 ETL 06-113150 (410) 293-2736 NIOSH 76-1 30

Air delivery by our Radial Diffuser system. CFR 407/18/1999 airflow preliminary readings measuredairfiows average 75 fpm with high extreme at 92fpm and low extreme at 53 fpm.Range was accepted by NAVFACENGCOM Code15 W.R Gibbings

Glenview Police 10 Niagara JACE Multi function programmable Thomas City of Glenview MIL/HNDBK 1027Glenview, IL 40’ pressure relation of range to adjacent space Corcoran 2500 East Lake Ave UFC 4 160-01

Direct fired gas heat only. 708-354- Glenview, IL 60026 ETL 06-113150 847-901-6126 NIOSH 76-1 30

Air delivery by our Radial Diffuser system. Test & CFR 40balance conducted by United Test & Balance. AABCPreliminary & final airflow readings average 75fpm. With high velocity extreme at 81 fpm and lowextreme at 64 fpm. Written report & summaryaccepted by and filed with Glenview building dept.

HVPD 7 Niagara JACE Multi function programmable Thomas Village of Hunting MIIJHNDBK 1027Hunting Valley, 32’ Delivery volume control for pressure drop control Corcoran Valley UFC 4 160-01OH over HEPA& recirculatiori air system w/ air/air 708-3 38251 Fairmount Blvd ETL 06-11

energy recovery. Direct Fired gas heat with chilled 3150 Hunting Valley, OH NlOSH 76-1 30water cooling. 44022 CFR 40

440-247-7324 AABC

USMC WTB 18 Niagara JACE Multi function programmable Thomas US. Navy MIL/HNDBK 1027Quantico, VA 82’ pressure relation of range to adjacent space Corcoran Marine Corps UFC 4 160-01

Direct fired gas heat only. 708-354- 27211 Garand road ETL 06-1 13150 Quantico, VA 22134

Air delivery by our Radial Diffuser system. (703) 784-5527 CFR 408/10/1999 airflow preliminary readings measuredairfiows average 75 fpm with high extreme at 82fpm and low extreme at 57 fpm.Range was accepted by NAVFACENGCOM Code15 W,R Gibbings

Key Design and Construction Experience: Contractor

In this section, we present information required of the contractor (also Patriot Range Technologies) whowill be responsible lbr the bullet capturing system for the Keesler firing range. The solicitation requests alisting of at least three ranges in operation within the continental U.S. having at least a 24-ft wide firingline and meeting NIOSH and ETL ventilation requirements. Below, we summarize Patriot RangeTechnologies’ participation in I I such firing ranges.

Patriot Range Technologies Range Bullet Trap Experience Summary

Location # lanes Bullet Trap Type I Ballistic Rating and Patriot Owner Design Criteriawidth Ammunition Types Contact

USNRTC 36 Patriot M-1 8 Steel escalator type. Thomas U.S. Navy MIIJHNDBK 1027Great Lakes, III 160 Corcoran U.S.S Wisconsin UFC 4 160-01

National Institute of Justice rating (N.I.J) is level 708 354- # 7315 Great Lakes, ETL 06-11# 4 small arms ammunition capabilities .22 3150 IL 60088 N.l.Jthrough .50 BMG shotgun capabilities # 9 bird 847-688-5661 EPA CFR 40through 00 buck & rifled slug. Bullet trap has UN 1H21Y140/Smechanical spent projectile & materialaccumulator to move debris to single sourcecollection drum

NASPAX 16 Patriot Envirostop granular rubber type. - Thomas U.S. Navy MILJHNDBK 1027Patuxent River, 72’ Corcoran 21876 Cuddihy Road UFC 4 160-01MD National Institute of Justice rating (N.lJ) is level 708 354- # 2624 ETL 06-11

# 4 small arms ammunition capabilities .22 3150 Patuxent River, MD N.l.Jthrough .50 BMG shotgun capabilities # 7 bird 20670 EPA CFR 40through 00 buck & rifled slug. 301 342-5151

FWPSC 18 Patriot Envirostop granular rubber type. Thomas City of Fort Wayne MILIHNDBK 1027Fort Wayne, IN 75’ Corcoran 7602 Patriot Crossing UFC 4 160-01

National Institute of Justice rating (N.l.J) is level 708 354- Fort Wayne, IN 46816 ETL 06-11# 4 small arms ammunition capabilities .22 3150 260-427-5568 N.I.Jthrough .50 BMG shotgun capabilities # 7 bird EPA CFR 40

_______ through 00 buck & rifled slug. LEED

32nd street 8 Patriot Envirostop granular rubber type. Thomas U.S. Navy MIIJHNDBK 1027San Diego, CA 32’ Corcoran Bldg 3137 Small Arms UFC 4 160-01

National Institute of Justice rating (N.l.J) is level 708 354- Range ETL 06-114 small arms ammunition capabilities .22 3150 32nd Street Station N.l.J

through .50 3MG shotgun capabilities # 7 bird San Diego, CA 92136 EPA CFR 40through 00 buck & rifled slug. 619-556-1835

Glenview Police 10 Patriot Envirostop granular rubber type. Thomas City of Glenview MIL/HNDBK 1027Glenview, IL 40’ Corcoran 2500 East Lake Ave UFC 4 160-01

National Institute of Justice rating (N.I.J) is level 708 354- Glenview, IL 60026 ETL 06-1 1# 4 small arms ammunition capabilities .22 3150 847-901-6126 N.l,Jthrough .50 BMG shotgun capabilities # 7 bird EPA CFR 40through 00 buck & rifled slug.

HVPD 7 Patriot Envirostop granular rubber type. Thomas Village of Hunting MILJHNDBK 1027Hunting Valley, 32’ Corcoran Valley UFC 4 160-01OH National Institute of Justice rating (N.I.J) is level 708 354- 38251 Fairmount Blvd ETL 06-11

# 4 small arms ammunition capabilities .22 3150 Hunting Valley, OH NIOSH 76-130through .50 BMG shotgun capabilities # 7 bird 44022 CFR 40through 00 buck & rifled slug. —_______________ 440-247-7324 —

USMC lA/TB 18 Patriot Envirostop granular rubber type. Thomas U.S. Navy MILIHNDBK 1027Quantico, VA 82’ Corcoran Marine Corps UFC 4 160-01

National Institute of Justice rating (N.I.J) is level 708 354- 27211 Garand road ETL 06-11I # 4 small arms ammunition capabilities .22 3150 Quantico, VA 22134 N.l.J

through .50 3MG shotgun capabilities # 7 bird (703) 784-5527 EPA CFR 40through 00 buck & rifled slug.

Southfield 7 Patriot M-1 8 Steel escalator type. Thomas City of Southfield, Ml MIL/HNDBK 1027Police 28’ Corcoran 26000 Evergreen Rd UFC 4 160-01Southfield, Ml National Institute of Justice rating (N.l.J) is level 708 354- Southfield, MI 48037 ETL 06-11

# 4 small arms ammunition capabilities .22 3150 248-796-5539 N.I.Jthrough .50 BMG shotgun capabilities # 9 bird EPA CFR 40

Location # lanes Bullet Trap Type I Ballistic Rating and Patriot Owner Design Criteriawidth Ammunition Types Contact

through 00 buck & rifled slug. Bullet trap has i UN 1H2/Y1 40/Smechanical spent projectile & materialaccumulator to move debris to single sourcecollection drum.

OCSO 9 — Patriot M-35 Steel escalator type. Thomas County of Ottawa, Ml MIL/HNDBK 1027

Ottawa, Ml 36’ Corcoran 12220 Filmore UFC 4 160-01National Institute of Justice rating (N.l.J) is level 708 354- West Olive, Ml 49460 ETL 06-11# 4 small arms ammunition capabilities .22 3150 248-796-5539 N.l.Jthrough 30.06 shotgun capabilities # 8 bird EPA CFR 40through 00 buck & rifled slug. Bullet trap has UN 1H2/Y1 80/Smechanical spent projectile & materialaccumulator to move debris to single source

•_______ collection drum.

TPD 15 Patriot M-35 Steel escalator type. Thomas Tempe Police Dept MIL/HNDBK 1027

Tempe, AZ 60 Corcoran 8201 S Hardy UFC 4 160-01National Institute of Justice rating (N.l.J) is level 708 354- Tempe, AZ 85284 ETL 06-11# 4 small arms ammunition capabilities .22 3150 480-858-6233through 30.06 shotgun capabilities # 8 bird EPA CFR 40through 00 buck & rifled slug. Bullet trap has UN 1H2/Y1 00/Sbasic individual 15 gal. collection drums at eachlane section for spent projectile & debriscollection.

MCSO 6 Patriot SRB Dura-beam stackable rubber Thomas Milwaukee County MILIHNDBK 1027Oak Creek, WI 30’ composite. Corcoran Sherriffs Office UFC 4 160-01

708 354- 821 West State Street, ETL 06-1 1National Institute of Justice rating (N.l.J) is level 3150 Room 107 N.l.J# 4 small arms ammunition capabilities .22 Milwaukee,WI 53233 EPA CFR 40through 30.06 shotgun capabilities # 7 bird (414) 278-4766through 00 buck & rifled slug. Beams interlockand can be stacked to 12’ high without addedsupport. Beams are flexible. —

I

/ i1Patriot Range Technologies

General Customer References

(03/30/1 0)

User and Location Contact Customer since

Hollywood Police Terry Haddock 09/01/99Department Rangernaster3250 Hollywood Blvd. 954-967-4633Hollywood, FL 33021

Coral Gables Police Dept. Ray Azan 03/15/012801 Salzedo Street RangernasterCoral Gables, FL 33134 305-442-1600

U.S Navy Patuxent river Greg Mclane 07/30/0121876 Cuddihy Road RaigeinasteiN.A.S Patuxent River 301 342-5151PATUXENT RIVER, MD20670

Mike Redmond 05/01/05Glenview Police Depu Chief2500 East Lake Ave 847-729-5000Glenview, IL 60026

Arlington Heights PoliceMike Mijan 09/01/9433 S. Arlington HeightsCommander

road 847 368-5340Arlington, IL 60005

Evanston Police Dept,Rich Eddington 06/01/921454 Elmwood AvenueChief

Evanston, IL 60201847 866-5005

Patriot Range Technologies7928 £ Madison StreetBurr Ridge IL 60527

(708) 354-3150 (708) 354-3163 Fax

Hinsdale Police Dept. Brad Bloom 09/15/98121 Symonds Drive ChiefHinsdale, IL 60521 630-789-7088

Federal Reserve Bank of Ed Marsh 06/30/96Richmond Rangernaster

502 S. Sharp Street 410-576-3489Baltimore, MD 21201

Federal Reserve Bank of Jim Rolette 08/01/98Atlanta (Nashville) Rangemster301 8th Ave North 615-251-7190Nashville, TN 37203

04/01/97United States Marshal Jason ThomasService DUSM400 East 9th Street (816) 512-2021#3740KANSAS CITY, MO 64106

U.S. Marshal Service Justin Davis 06/01/99Roybal Federal Bldg. DUSM255 East Temple St. 213-798-0285Los Angles, CA 90012

U.S. Marshal Service Kevin Guinn 09/15/98222 W 7th Ave # 28 DUSMAnchorage, AK 99513 907-271-5164

Washington State Criminal Bob Cecil 05/01/99Justice Training Center Director19010 1st Avenue South 206-835-7373BLEASeattle, WA 98148

U.S. Marshal ServiceJames Ellis 05/01/07

700 Grant Street # 241DUSM

Suite 2360412-355-3236Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Patriot Range Technologies 27928 S. Madison StreetBurr Ridge IL 60527

(708) 354-3150 (708) 354-3163 Fax

Connecticut Dept. of Jack Watson 07/15/99Corrections Rangernaster

69 Sand Hill Road 860-749-7471Enfield, CT 06082

DHS / FAM Pat Lenart 05/30/99899 upper express drive Senior admin

Chicago 60666 (773’) 894-5588

Fort Wayne Police‘Elm Flannon 12/01/98

Academy 1istiiictor7602 Patriot Crossing 260 427-5568Fort Wayne, 46816

Hillside Police Department Tim Abner 09/01/07425 Hillside Avenue DetectiveHillside, IL 60162 708-202-4361

National Rifle Association Greg Wodack08/01/02HQ Range Range Manager

11250 Waples Mill Road 703-267-1489Fairfax, VA 22030

Patriot Range Technologies 37928 S. Madison StreetBurr Ridge IL 60527

(708) 354-3150 (708) 354-3163 Fax

Local Completed Police Projects (as of 4/01/10)

User and Location Contact start date completion date

River Forest Police Ofcr Jim O’Shea 05/01/97 09/15/97Pistol range 708 366-7125River Forest, IL$ 156,000.00

Flinsdale Police Chf Brad Bloom 08/01/98 09/15/98Pistol range 630 789-7088Hinsdale, IL$ 46,000.00

U.S. Navy RTC MAC Ed Stasney 04/01/00 12/21/00Great Lakes, IL 847-688-5661$1,025,000.00

Mundelein Police Cmdr Don Hanson 12/01/00 07/15/02Pistol range 847-949-3250Mundelein, IL$ 195,000.00

University of Illinois Sgt. Al Peralis 05/01/03 12/09/03Police 312 413-5575Chicago, IL$ 343,567.00

Glenview Police Sgt. John Linden s 09/01/05 05/22/06Glenview, IL 847-901-6126$270,000.00

Maywood Police Del. Vince Wilcox 11/05/06 07/02/07Maywood, IL 708 450-4470$219,000.00

Hillside Police Det. Tim Abner 05/05/07 12/28/07Hillside, IL 708 449-6131$223,000.00

Mount Prospect Police Sgt Jeff Schmitz 02/05/08 04/20/08Mount Prospect, IL 847 870-5653$ 97,000.00

Patriot Range Technologies7928 S Madison StreetBurr Ridge, IL 60527

(708) 354-3150 (708) 354-3163 Fax

Patriot Range Technologies

Current Projects

(04/30/10)

User and Location Contact Start Dat Project type

National Armory Jeff Dillard 03/01/10 Target, Trap, Lighting, HVACGun Store & Range (954) 915-8226 Ballistic & AcousticPompano Beach, FL$ 670,000.00

Chicago Armory Carl Swanson 02/01 / 10 Target, Trap, Lighting, HVACShooting Sports Complex (847) 836-6700 Ballistic & Acoustic

Carpentersville, IL$ 620,000.00

Article 11 Barry Soskin 0 1/18/10 Target, Trap, Lighting, HVACGun Store & Range (847) 910-7836 Ballistic & Acoustic

Lombard, IL$ 996,000.00

Arlington Heights Mike Miljan 06/01/10 Target, System & BallisticPolice Range CommanderArlington 1-leights, IL (847) 368-5340$ 54,400.00

Patriot Range Technologies7928 S. Madison StreetBurr Ridge IL 60527

(708) 354-3150 (708) 354-3163 Fax

S-SP-EENC L-STD-BLK

Patriot Range Technologies7928 S. Madison Street, Burr Ridge, IL 60527(708) 354-3150 (708,) 354-3163 faxwww.palriotrange. Cull?

NEMA class I indoor enclosure for range system electronics. Located at left oeach lane partition for usewith or without stall / partition units.

Height is 12” below ceiling with bottom olcontrol box at 68” A.E.F.

Can be hard-wired for 120 VAC, or corded to utilize existing electrical receptacles.

PA’IRRYI’ 1{\G1._11(I 1\OLOGILS L 1. (‘

Iiiii is L IlIU114 S’IHI-.

II

I4NG(C TECH

•

• * I * *•• *

• •,r- * •

a .:9

Individual Control (multi lane UCP) Unit with booth speaker option.

•$Ml215-SS

,t ,...

E

The Patriot Range Technologies RangetechTM Individual Control Unit (UCP) hasall the capabilities of the Master Control, with the exception that it only controlsan individual lane. Any program from the Master Console can be downloaded

the UCP, or, the UCP can accept programming on its own. Any targeti be entered ipto the UCP for immediate use or stored for a later

on the backlit LCD display face occur in real timeof reading The UCP keypad is extremely

v corpputer skills to operate

“The choice of the National Rifle Association of America!’.1 :

RRNGYCH

This is the only system that meets the demanding needs of theNational Rifle Association. This system is installed at the NRArange in Fairfax, VA.

The RangetechTM UCP operator interface utilizes our new9-bit serial protocol. The operational system version 2.15 isour most advanced user-friendly software in existence.

*Each UCP consists of a 2-line 20-character backlit liquidcrystal display. A 20 key membrane, or spring-gas button,keypad to control all function. The white keys are typical formanual functions, while the colored keys control programfunction.

*Each UCP is capable of storing and executing four profilesof up to 1000 individual steps each.

*jp units can be installed in groups of up to 40 lane unitsper master console.

units can execute individual profiles (exercises) fromthe master simultaneously.

The membrane keys consist of icon faced operation keys that maximize the functions of the UCP. HIT is notan active function at this point in time. The icon face of the keypad indicates exactly what they represent.They are as follows:

FRIEND Activates target to display the friend face.EDGE Activates target to display the edge or concealed face.FOE Activates target to display the foe face.

MOVE BACK Activates destination distance by scrolling backward.MOVE FORWARD Activates destination distance by scrolling forward.

START / STOP KEY Start sets the carrier in manual mode and loads the units default settings at its current location. This is(START Description) valid in any mode.START / STOP KEY Stops target carrier activity in manual niocle.(-STOP Description) In profile mode is cause the carrier to go in a wait sate.

PAUSE / RESUME KEY Stops target activity during a profile at the end of the step.(PAUSE Description)

PAUSE! RESUME KEY Allows the user to continue the profile after it has been stopped or paused. This is only while in the(RESUME Description) profile mode.

HIT optional hit detection of target. Corning June 2dtiXTARGET CHANGE Moves target carrier backward behind home stop.

LIGI-IT Activates light intensities, low, medium, & high by scrolling one at a time.TIMER - Decreases timed Foe value in manual mode & timer value in profile modesTIMER ± Increases timed Foe value in manual mode & timer value in profile modes

RANDOM / ALIBI KEY In manual mode provides the user with a 12 step random profile.(RANDOM Description)RANDOM / ALIBI KEY Allows a user to stop the profile and repeat the last step. This feature is only valid in the Lock Step

(ALIBI Description) Mode.EDIT PROFILE Allows user to edit the user-accessed profile.

HOME Causes_target_carrier to move to home_stop.PREVIOUS STEP Used in programming for review of previous step.

NEXT STEP Used in programming for review or insertion of next step.SELECT MODE Used to select the mode of operation (Manual or profile).

CLEAR Clears the current display.ENTER Executes profile function or the move to distance selected,

PATRIOT RANGE TECHNOLOGIES I L C

Fir(arxL]s I’iaiiiiiig Sysniis

vi-nv.p;ii rioti;u g(.ui n

..

Piiiii Raiigc ‘Fttliinlogus ,lfl() 5. I’)iiisIiir Roid, (‘otmii’vsuk, II. (iftt25 t708) 3.t’l—3I,5() 17(111) :-U.I—3It3 Fa ()i)l

1{i( ) I k.\c( I ‘1ICI INOLOGHIS I. 1 CTTTITT

i;itiiis I’iaiiiiii .,\Shn.

\1VV )IlTI)IIII’ LI)I

1A NG( E CH

1I

The Patriot Master i itroI Onsole (MRC)3d, as seen here.

PATRIOT RANGE TECT-{\OIflGIl’.S L T*************

S—MRC-1 000—SS 1ix-txits iraiiiiiig S\sIL,rls

pill rlc)[ltl l((Oll

RA NG(ECH

Typical display of four lane operation.Display shows lane # I as the onlyactive lane. Lane # I is displayed onedge (concealed).

PilUI )1 Pa!lgc Il_I I 11101 J4lC’

3300 S. I)anshcr koa(I(oi,’.tIv, II 60323(7l)i) 32 P31.50 o. 2(70H) 33 p:I63 FIll 0 4)ilLI l0hIilIIgc.l oil I

*MRc units operate on windows 2000 orLinux platforms.

*MRC can be mounted in a variety ofdifferent ways.

*LCD displays are available for most MRCinstallations

*ALL MRC consoles integrate wave(sound) files into the running profiles forrealistic advanced and combat training.

*ALL MRC consoles integrate auxiliarycontrol into the running profiles. Thisallows the automatic activation ofaccessories, such as light bars, forrealistic advanced and combat training.

The Range te c hTM operation applicationsoftware displays the current task, status,step, position, facing, function, etc.... of allrunning targets.

The Range te c hTM application software isdesigned to operate up to forty (40) lanes atone time. Systems can be configured to utilize“virtual desktop” multi-screen displays andcan save up to several hundred thousandprogram exercises.

The Master Control Computer is a Windows2000 Professional platform with a Pentium IllI gyg. processor. We outfit the controllerwith a minimum of a 8 GIG hard drive and128 Megabytes of RAM. The Computer iscapable of creating, storing and executingan infinite number of programs relative tothe Target System. Each individual Targetor any combination of Targets (as seen onthe above screen), can be summoned toreact to one or more programssimultaneously.

The MRC operates in conjunction with the 9-bit serial UCP interface devices for unparalleled operation.

Th Patriot Range Technologies LLC “Hercules”TM Target Carrier was designed, in part, with? NRA. The HerculesTM is the only monorail target system that meets the

;. of the NRA range in Fairfax, VA. The HerculesTM is fully armored andrpntatrnpacts from aU handguns, light center fire rifle and

are contained within the armored body ofstrikes. Additionally, the carrier is

rely 1ve cables, whisker wires, or‘ intensity on-board

PVfRIOT u vcci ‘lECHNOLOGIES I. L C

l1[(’IL IllS llUfllI.l SVSI(lIlS

II

R6NG(TECH

Association of America!

WI—ICTPtA1

Ap

S-IND-1 80-SS

PATRIO1’ RA\(;E TECFROWGH:S I I. CTTTTTTTT

I’i r ;i I I I IS I Iai i It I i4 NI tt..

tYtVi .J)1L1K)LI II II( I (SI

RG((T C H

Pntriil 8.iuigc

I ccl IIIOI( 11411’S

5:100 S 1atishei 8(551(ounL’stde, II. D52,(708) 54-3Ifl ext. 2(708) a[-3 63 FI\

\vww’.paLtIoIt aligeloHi

*Can.ier has an internal 10 ga. Aluminum frame to house and mount allpower, drive & information components. Drive motor is rated for 6 to 90VDC.Speeds are adjustable from .3 to 14 feet per second.*Exteriur shell is a 16 gauge cold roll steel cover.*Tal.get turning motor rotates target backer in either direction to displayFiend ( lace left), Edge (conceal), and Foe (face right).

zzzrz1

P\’llU( 11 RA.\(1 ‘I’1(I I\( )L( )UIIS 1, 1. C

I i ii i Is

fU NTECH

4

4-

Enviros top Bullet Trap.The Envirostop is an all recycled rubber rncdia trap. The media of the Envirostop is theecyc1ed granulated rubber product of automotive & machinery tires. The granular media is

narily devoid of steel, or other fibers. The Envirostop is designed to accept all small;, other than incendiary, or tracer type rounds.

all known pistol, shotgun, rifle and high-powered if1eofircendiry, or tracer, rounds. High-powered uses

as well as many other high-energy types.

PATRIOT RkNGE TECT INOLOGIES L I. C*************

I)i-(’Li iris i tii1flhi.4 ,St’nis

Pano Riiigi’ (‘rh noka41Ls

5300 S. Danslier Road(ounbsidc, IL 60525

(708) 3513 150 e. # 2(708) 3513 (63 Fmnw(oonhl igc. coin

ii IIVIOh1

fl11 NG(TECH

FRONT TRIANOL[SECTION ENysTP-A

REAR SECTIONENV—STP-R

CENTER BRACE

PATRIOT RANGE rECHNOLOGIES LLCENVIROSTOP 3’ X 3’ ANGLE IRONFRAMING ISOMETRICDRAWING SET ENVIROSTOP-FRH-l-I

5—006-S

C

SA

FE

TY

BA

FF

LE

&S

AF

ET

YC

ElL

INC

FO

RM

ING

CO

NF

IGU

RA

TIO

NS

HA

NG

ER

BE

VIG

E

SC

PA

NE

L48

”1

48”

RA

NC

ET

EC

HB

AF

FL

ES

03/3

1/9

8

/0GA

UG

EG

AL

VA

NIZ

ED

ST

EE

LPL

AT

E/

Z00B

FR

AM

BO

LT

ED

TH

RO

UG

HP

AN

EL

HA

NG

ER

DE

VIC

E

/

.625”

PLY

WO

OD

FA

CE

The

FoamFactory.

Acoustic

Foam,

Soundproofing

Foam,

Colors

http://ww

w.thefoam

factory.com/acousticfoam

/colors.htn

FOA

Mm

attressesseats

&cuio

soutdorirfcamcom

fort&support

chUd

saicty.

acoustcfoam

.packagng

foamcpn

cciifo

rndosed

cellfoam

octbcds

acC

ssorje

s:

dra

pery

tedio

rn

moId

i.igsh

est.com

thefoamfactor.corn

AC

OU

ST

ICFO

AM

>C

OL

OR

S

Stop

byour

locationto

seeour

products!

FY

Ifor

yourln

form

atn

seeit!

EF

clickfor

frqu

en

tiyak

d!

questionsab

ou

ttc

oustic

foam

FREE

5&H

!.I

All

purch

aseso

ver

$Th.0O

Ihav

eF

RE

ES&

H!

NO

TE

:C

olo

rsab

ove

may

differto

actual

foamcolors

dueto

differencesin

yo

ur

mo

nito

rs(screen

s)setu

p.

2of4

12r,9flflO

71D

K

We

Icome

toF

oamF

actory

http

:!!ww

w.th

efoarn

ctory

.com

/acousticfo

am/E

ggcrateN

RC

.htn

---------

The

LjJJF

OA

MFA

CTO

RY

FOA

Mm

tresse

sseats

&cushio”

sN

outdoor foam•com

fort&stm

portciId

safetyacoustic

ftamoackacnq

roam•open

cellfoam

closedcellfoEm

cot

bcdsaC

CeS5O

rieS

drap

erytech

.com

moldinqsbest.cam

thefo

amfacto

ryco

m

AC

OU

ST

ICFO

AM

>E

GG

C.R

AT

E>

NR

CR

AT

ING

S

Noise

Reductio

nC

oeffic

ien

t(N

RC

)A

naco

ustical

foam

pro

duct’s

effectiven

esscan

belearn

edby

view

ing

itsN

RC

rating

.T

he

stan

dard

and

com

mon

lyused

meth

od

tocalcu

lateth

ese

ratin

gs

isth

eA

STM

C4

23

test.

This

meth

od

covers

freq

uen

cie

sbetw

een1

25

HZ

and

4000H

Z.

Bu

t,th

eoverall

NR

Cratin

gis

the

calculated

avera

ge

offre

qu

en

cie

s2

50

Hz

to2

00

0H

z.T

his

isd

one

tosu

pp

ress

the

chan

ceof

testin

gerro

rs.

,_

—T

T2

5H

zT

iSO

Hz

500H

z1000H

zI2000H

zP

1zO

veraII

[1-1

/2”

0.1

20

.20

0.5

80

.92

0.9

71.0

1.6

7E

gg

crate

:

____

1/2

0.2

00

.33

0,6

8:

0.9

91

1.0

11.0

30.7

5E

ggcra

te

PH

ON

ES

86.G

27.3

625

FA

X536G

Z7.5

S3O

Hom

eI

Custo

mer

Serv

iceI

Co

ntact

Us

IA

bout

Us

ID

ataS

heets

View

Cart

Ch

ecko

ut

dra

pery

tech

.com

mold

ingsb

est.com

Ith

efoam

factory

.com

*C

op

yrig

ht

©1997-2

009,

Fo

amF

actory

,In

c.A

llrig

hts

reserv

ed

.

friIIIIII

PH

ON

E586.6

Z7.3

526

{F

AX

5S

6..8

27

5S

3O

6’

RB

SO

ii4nir

-Iofl

Welcom

eto

Foam

Factory

http://ww

w.thefoam

factory.com/tech/A

cousticTech.htn,

The

‘FO

AM

FAC

TO

RY

22800

Hall

Rd

Clin

ton

Tw

p.,

MI

48036

Tel:

58

6-6

27

-36

26

Fax

:5

86

-62

7-5

83

0w

ww

.thefo

amfacto

ry.co

m

Pro

perty

Test

Meth

od

Valu

es

Density

(Lbs./C

ubic

Ft.)

2.0

25%

IFD

(Lbs)

45

Su

pp

ort

Facto

r(6

5%

/25%

Mm

.)1

.90

Ten

sile(P

SI)

Mm

..

13.0

Elo

ngatio

n(%

)M

m.

AS

TP

aE

b3S7

4200

Tear

(PP

I)M

m.

1.3

0

Resilie

ncy

(%)

Mm

.35

Fire

Reta

rdant

Cla

ssificatio

nC

lassB

,C

alif.T

B#

117

Conta

ins

NO

PB

DE

’s.(S

elfE

xtin

guish

ing)

All

valu

esrep

orted

arety

pical

valu

es.W

ecan

no

tguaran

teeth

eapplicability

or

the

accuracy

of

thisin

form

ation

or

the

suitabilityof

the

pro

duct

for

any

particu

larp

urp

ose.

This

pro

duct

issold

with

out

warran

ty,

ex

pre

ssed

or

implied.

(Unless

state

doth

erwise.)

Buyer

Pro

duct

Gen

eral&

Tech

nical

Info

rmatio

n

Date:

10/2

5/1

999

Nam

e:A

coustic

Foam

Genera

lIn

form

atio

nA

coustic

foam

isan

gre

at

qu

alityfo

amw

itha

med

ium

feel.T

his

foam

isfo

rmu

latedsp

ecificallyfo

raco

ustical

applicatio

ns.

Co

mm

on

applicatio

ns

inclu

de

acoustic

treatm

ent,

sound

dead

enin

g,

arts

and

crafts(av

ailable

in12

differen

tco

lors).

Typical

lifeis

5-1

0years.

Iof.2

11 /‘iO

/2flflQ7

1P

ly

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

SC

HE

DU

LE

Tem

pered

Make-U

pA

irU

nitM

ark:M

arkI

Green

heck

Volum

erotal

SP

Operating

Weight

Motor

Info

rmatio

nQ

tyM

odel(C

FM)

(inw

g)FR

PMP

ower

(hp)(L

b.)S

ize(hp)

v/C/P

End:

Mo

t1r

Windings

FLA

DG

X-120-H

3212000

1.444761

7.8141407

10460/60/3

OD

P1725

118.4

Heatin

g

Tem

perature(D

egF)

Energy

(MB

H)

Connection

Building

Control

Type

Gas

Type

Gas

Winter

DB

Max

Max

LAT

InputO

utputE

fficiencyG

as(IN

)P

ressure

Access

Direct

Gas

Natural

-1085.2

75.21200

110492%

1’1/2

PSIR

ight

I.:

Sid

e

Outlet

Sound

Po

wer

By

Octav

eB

and

Lw

AdB

AS

ones

62.5125

250500

10002000

40008000

98.988.1

85.985

8281.8

77.972.8

88.477.4

30.8?

Lw

A-

Aw

eigh

tedso

un

dp

ow

erlevel

based

onA

NS

IS

1.4?

dBA

-A

weig

hted

So

un

dpressu

relevel

base

on11.f

dBattenuation

per

octab

eban

dat

5.0ft

?N

oise

Criteria

(NC

)b

ase

don

anav

erage

attenuatio

nof

11.5dB

per

octab

eb

and

at5.0

ft.

OP

TIO

NS

AN

DA

CC

ES

SO

RIE

SM

ake-upair

unitshall

beIRI

&E

TL

listedto

AN

SIZ

83.4and

CA

N3.7

Air

FlowA

rrangement

-O

utdoorA

irO

nly-

100%O

SAH

orizontalU

nit-

No

Weatherhood

Provided

-Filter

Section

w/2’

Disposable

FiltersD

ischargeP

osition-

Upblast

-N

oD

iffuserInlet

Dam

perInlet

Air

Sen

sor

-H

eatingC

ontrolC

enter

Factory

Finish

-G

alvanizedB

lower

Isolation-

Neoprene

Flam

eS

ensing-

Flam

eRod

IgnitionControl

-Pilot

Tem

peratu

reC

ontrol-

Discharge

I10RTh’I1Et1’ Printed Date: 10/19/2009

____

Job: patriot Systems-ir p1PL)Building Value inAir. Product Type: Make-Up Air

Mark: MUA

D G Tempered Supply Fan DG-120-H30

CONSTRUCTION FEATURES• Exterior housing constructed of galvanized steel Weottherization Removable access panels Painted orgalvanized steel blower and bearing supports Forward curved steel blower and motor• Fan assembly is mountedon vibration isolators Motor pulleys are adjustable through 10 tip and fixed for 15 tip and greater• Fan shaft is c usmounted in permanently lubricated ball bearings (up through size 118) or ball hearing pillow blocks (size 120 andgreater) . Static free belts Corrosion resistant fasteners are standard.

Selection Performance Job_PropertiesHeating Direct Gas Volume 12000 CFM Elevation 0 ftAirflow Arrangement Outdoor Air Only Total SP 1.623 in wg Winter Dry Bulb -10 FDamper Inlet Damper External SP 0.5 in wg Summer Dry Bulb 89 FFilters 2 Disposable Power 8.26 hp Summer Wet Bulb 76 FUnit Arrangement Horizontal Fan RPM 788

Unit Configuration ElectricaL C_onfg urationDischarge Position Horizontal Control Center YesCoating Galvanized Freeze Protection YesInsulation Type Duct Liner 1-leating Inlet Air Sensor YesInsulation Location Heat Source On 2 NO, 2 NC on Supply Starter YesIsolation NeopreneMounting Options Mounting By Others

Outlet Sound Power by Octave Band

I 62.5 I 125 250 I 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 ILwA I dBA I Sones

j 98.9 88.3 I 85.9 85 j 82.2 81.8 78 72.9 88.5 77.5 31• LwA - A weighted soud power level based on ANSI Si .4• dBA - A weighted sound pressure level base on 11.5 dB attenuation per octave band at 5.0 II.• Noise Criteria (NC) based on an average attenuation of 11.5 dB per octave band at 5.0 11.

4.0 ____ .. ._______.-- 16

3.5 14

3.0 12

25..., .. . 10

20 -... S

05 . .. 2

0.0

._._..wu..:._

___________________-

0

0 2 4 6 8 0 2 14 6 18 20

volunle ICFM) x 000

RPM Curre- - .

. SyoleorCuneOruke Power Curn

- Do eel soled to to Fell DI lOPS elSe CUnC

CAPS 4.2.739 F:\APPS\GREENHCK\Jobs\bob\2009\patrior Systems - South Euclid.gcj Page 3 016

q

GREP’HECKPrinted Date: 10/19/2009

j IV Job: patriot Systems - th&ut?J /“i°PBuilding Value in Ai, Product Type: Make-Up Air

Mark: MUA

D G Tempered Suppiy Fan DG-120-H30

Heating Information Cooling InformationHeating Type Direct Gas Cooling Type No CoolingGas Type NaturalHeating Input 1,056.5 MBHHeating Output 972.0 MBHLeaving Air Temperature 65.0 FAgency Approval ETL and IRIBuilding Gas Pressure 1)2 PSITemperature Control DischargeRoom Override YesUnits Rated Gas Pressure 1/2 PSIIgnition Control PilotFlame Sensing Flame Rod

Motor Data

Mark Fan HP VICIP Mtr. Amps RPM Enclosure Efficiency- Supply Fan 10 460I0/3 14 1725 ODP EPACT

MCA: 178MOP: 30

Filter Data

Type Qty Size2” Disposable 10 20” x 25” x 2”

Weights

Unit Weight*: 1,195 lb* Weight does not include accessories external to the unit(curb, exhaust fan(s), diffuser, etc).

CAPS 4 2 739 F:\APPSGREENHCK\Jobs\bob\2009\patriot Systems - South Euclid gcj Page 4 of 6

SU

GO

ES

TE

DT

op

orW

IND

O\J

FRA

ME

BO

TT

OM

RD

ILD

IFF

US

EPL

EN

UM

BO

XT

‘JLL

BO

TT

OM

TA

NG

EN

Tor

RA

DIA

LD

IFF

US

ER

7/_

4/,

7’—4

7’—l

PLENUMSECTIONHASFIVEAIRFOILVANES(PRE—INSTALLED)

IFFIELDINSTALLEDWITH#8x1”TEKSCREWS

RADIALSECTIONISPRE—GASKETED

*MATERIALIS24GAUGEGALV.PaIrotRangeTechnoIogesLLC

tmtEIicw)J5.Vdl

Radlo—dTf—1

C.lICKII

RADIALDIFFUSERASSEMBLY-‘-“°_A&lAltItAttKIZIAMIIG

TUC/I3,2N/ARadIoI—dIf—l*‘,tWCIIAICKDII&

EAP‘ft’/°3I

a,C0

-oCC

0-i

-Ic,

E:3

a,

a,(0D

9—

0

U,C0

0a)Co

a,

a,C

a,a,

I.

CDCDCDcOD

4(3

UiC,

40

CO

-J4

Us4

C

><

(0

x0L00C

(I)

L

0

L

0

0)C

Ca)00

0:3

00

>-

00:3U)

-CC:30

(0

0

a,>C-c

(0

0

ECID

0

L

a)C’,:3

9-9-

0

4-

0

(5)

C0

0a)

Li-)

SELECTED OPTIONS & ACCESSORIESDrain Conn. - 1 “Pipe Thread W/ PlugSteel Base, Permatector, Free Standing lsolatorwl 1” Den., Base Factory Mntd°ermatector Coating on Steel ComponentsClass B Motor tnsulalion or GreaterDrive Service Factor of 1.5- StandardExtended Lube LinesAccess door - BoltedWeatherhood, SteelEnergy Efficient Motor meets EPACT and NEMA 1210

Inlet / Outlet Sound Power by Octave Band

63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000LwA dBA

1O4A097 LL 86 LwA - A weighted sound power level, based on ANSISi .4. dBA - A weighted sound pressure level, basedon 11.5 dB attenuation per oclave band at 5.0 ft.

t5

BCa

Is

Dr

14GREENHECKBuilding Value in Ai

Printed Date: 11/4/2009Job: Patriot Range Mayfield Village

Product Type: CentrifugalMark: Mark 1

ENGINEERING DATA

Class Max.T Motor BISW Series 21 Backward Inclined Singlerpprox. Fan

Weight (lb) Frame Size WR2 (Ib-ft2) Width723 II 284 50 Ta Mark 1

**Weight does NOT include motor, drives, or accessoriesST.NDARD CONSTRUCTION FEATURES

EMotor l

IDrive Type

[ N/A Constant

CONFIGURATION

Arrangement Rotation PositionI Discharlria1Type

10 j CW TH Steel

HOUSING: Series 21 class I and II fans feature Perrna-Lock construction on sizes 7-49 andcontinuously welded housing on sizes 54-73 and all class Ill fans • Inlet collars on Arr. 1, 9,10 Unpunched outlet flange standard on class I and II sizes 33-73, all class III fans, and alldownblast fans (08) All structural steel parts phosphatized and coated with PermatectorBEARINGS, SHAFT, AND WHEEL: Heavy duty, self-aligning ball or roller pillow blockbearings. Polished, so lid steel shafts. Futly welded centrifugal wheel

INSTALLATION

Outlet 1I Inlet Conditions ConditionsJ

Standard Standard )MOTOR SPECS

MotorRPM V/C/P 1 Enclosure I Frame. . II25 1725 460/60/3 J ODP 284

SOUND

lit

toCC

C

a

0

25

211

RPM Carve— — Syslen Curvy— — — — Brake Power Curve

Do nor seleci In he ICR of Iris surge curve

mci 7OERTflED /RflTIflG,,/

.,/sOunDfiR

ID 15 20 25

Volume ICFMI 1000

CAPS 4 2739 C\Documents and Settings\BNeidingerDesklop\Road Fles\Patriol Range Mayfield Villagegcj Page 1 of 2

I MGREENHECK

5Ize:

Building Value in Aij

Arrangement: 10Class: 1

NOTES: All dimensions shown are in units of inches

Printed Date: 11/4/2009Job: Patriot Range Mayfleld Village

Product Type: CentrifugalMark: Mark 1

BISW Series 21 BackwardInclined Single Width

CAPS 4 2 739 C\Documents and Settings\BNeidinger\DesktopRoad Files\Patriot Range Mayfield Village gcj Page 2 of 2


City of Des PlainesPublic Works and Engineering Department

1420 Miner StreetDES iAINs Des Plaines, IL 60016

ILLINOIS Tel: 847-391-5390— Fax: 847-391-5619

Date: April 26, 2010

To: Jason Slowins , Acting City Manager

From: Adam M. Bo the, PB., CFM, Assistant Director of Public Works and Engineering

Cc: Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering

Subject: Crack Sealing Bid Opening

Issue: Bids for crack sealing were opened May 7, 2010. The invitation to bid requested a unit price perpound for placement of crack filling material on City maintained streets.

Analysis: Four bids were received by the City Clerk. Each bidder submitted a proposal indicating the unitprice per pound along with required City and IDOT Contractor Certification forms. The following tablelists the bid results:

CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT (per poimd)

North Suburban Asphalt Maintenance $ I .080

SKC Construction, Inc. — $1 .091

Denlerand Sons, Inc. —- $l.138

Behrn Pavement Maintenance, Inc. — $1 .230

For application purposes, one pound of crack filling material can fill approximately 6-8 linear feet ofcracks. The Public Works and Engineering Department has compiled a prioritized list of roads in whichthe approved contractor will be performing the work.

Pursuant to the Illinois Procurement Code, contractors are required to participate in United StatesDepartment of Labor programs for apprenticeship and training for the various crafts employed in theirbusiness. Recently, an official protest was logged by the Laborers’ District Council with the IllinoisDepartment of Transportation regarding the apprenticeship program of the low bidder on a similar projectin Lake County. However, this protest was denied as shown in the attached letter from l[)OT dated JuneI 5, 2010. No official protest was logged on the City’s project.

Recommendalion: Staff recommends award of the contract to the low bidder, North Suburban AsphaltMaintenance at a unit price per pound of $1.08. North Suburban is prequalilied with IDOF For this typeof work. Source of Ilinding would be the Motor Fuel Tax/Street Crack Filling cost center in the amountnot to exceed $25,000.

AttachmentsBid TabulationIDOT Compliance letterResolution

(flh

nois

Dep

artm

ent

‘of

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Tab

ulat

ion

ofB

ids

Cou

nty

CO

OK

Loc

alA

genc

yD

ES

PLA

INE

SS

ecti

on10

-000

00-0

4-G

ME

stim

ate.

24.8

6000

Dat

e:5/

7/20

10T

ime.

1000

A.M

.A

ppro

pria

tion.

$25

,000

.00

Nam

eof

Bid

der:

Add

ress

ofB

idde

r:

As

Rea

d:i

Tota

lB

id:

As

talc

ula

ted:l

—.

.1

Nor

thS

ubur

ban

Asp

halt

MSK

CC

nntn

tinn

Inc.

Den

ier

&C

nn

Ins’

P0

Box

497

P0

Box

503

1914

8S.

104t

hA

v.30

10R

oute

176

Par

kR

idge

,IL

6006

8W

est

Dun

dee,

IL60

118

Mok

ena,

IL60

448

Cry

stal

Lak

e,IL

6001

4

Beh

mP

avem

ent

Mai

nt..

In

Pro

posa

lG

uar

ante

eB

idB

ond

Bid

Bon

dB

idB

ond

Bid

Bon

dA

tten

ded

By

Ter

ms:

5%5%

5%5%

App

rove

dE

ngin

eer’

sE

stim

ate

Item

No.

Item

Del

iver

yU

nit

Qua

ntity

Uni

tP

rice

Tot

alU

nit

Pric

eT

otal

Uni

tP

rice

Tot

alU

nit

Pric

eT

otal

Uni

tP

rice

Tot

alR

OU

TIN

GA

ND

CR

AC

KSE

AL

ING

LB22

000

113

$2

48

60

.00

1.08

$23

,760

.00

1.09

$24,0

02.0

01.

14$

25,0

36.0

01.

23$

27,0

60.0

0—

.---.

$-

$$

$,—

$-

-$

-$

-$

-$

--

-$

-$

—$

--

$-

$$

-$

--

$-

$-

-

-$

-$

——

-$

--

$-

$-

-

-$

-$

--

$-

$-

$—

—$

--

-$

__

__

_$

--

-$

-$

-—

—-

$-

-$

-$

__

__

__

__

_

-$

--

$-

$_

__

__

——

-$

-$

-$

-$

—$

-$

--

$-

$-

$-

-$

-$

—-

$-

-$

-$

——

$-

-.

-$

__

__

——

-.

-$

-$

-$

——

$-

$-

-$

-$

—-

$-

-$

-$

__

__

——

-$

--

-$

__

__

_

—-

$-

--

$—

-$

$-

—$

-$

--

—$

-$

--

$$

-$

--

——

$-

$-

--

$—

$-

$-

-

-,-—

—$

-$

--

-$

,—

$-

$-

$-

—$

-$

--

——

-$

--

$—

-$

--

——

-$

--

-$

__

__

-—

—-

$-

--

$___

-

—-

$-

--

$_

__

_

——

-$

-$

--

$-___

$-

$-

--

$.—

-$

--

$-

$—

-$

--

-$

__

__

—-

$-

--

$_

__

_

--

:,-

$-

-$

__

__

.—

$-

--

-$

—.

$-

--

$-

$.__

__

S-

—

P,nt

ei5fl

41201ij

$23

,760

.00

23.7

6000

$25,0

36.0

027

,060

.00

25,0

36.0

027

,060

.00

BLR

1231

S(R

evO

1/6

/1O

)

Illinois Department of Transportation2300 South Dirksen Parkway I Springfield, Illinois I 62764

June 15, 2010

Laborers’ District CouncilLabor-Management Cooperative Corn mitteeChicago and Vicinity - LDCLMCCAttn: Ed Barry999 McCtintock Drive, Suite 301Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527

Re: Protest 05-06-2010, North Suburban Asphalt MaintenanceLake County, 10-00000-12-GM

Dear Mr. Barry:

North Suburban Asphalt Maintenance (North Suburban) was the apparent lowbidder for a Lake County Division of Transportation project referenced abovefrom the local letting of May 18, 2010.

The Office of Chief Counsel has considered your certified letter dated May 25,2010, wherein you indicated North Suburban is not in compliance with theresponsible bidder provision of the Illinois Procurement Code. Currently,North Suburban participates in an USDOL approved program for severalcrafts, including Heavy Equipment Operator. Therefore, because thecontractor is compliant with the apprenticeship and training requirement, theDepartment is denying your protest.

If you have further questions, please feel free to contact the Office of ChiefCounsel at (217) 782-0692.

Sincerely,

Christine M. Reed, P.E. E len Schanzle-HaskinsDirector of Highways Chief CounselChief Engineer

cc: North Suburban Asphalt Maintenance

CITY OF DES PLAINES


A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BID FROM NORTHSUBURBAN ASPHALT MAiNTENANCE, INC. FORCRACK SEALING ON VARIOUS ROADS THROUGHOUTDES PLAINES IN A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED$25,000.00.

WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 [llinois Constitution authorizes the Cityof Des Plaines to contract with individuals, associations and corporations, in any manner notprohibited by law or ordinance; and

WHEREAS, the Public Works and Engineering Department sent out a Request for Bidsfor crack sealing on various roads throughout Des Plaines and four vendors responded; and

WHEREAS, North Suburban Asphalt Maintenance, Inc. submitted the lowestresponsible bid for crack filling material at a unit price per pound of $1.08; and

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept the bid submitted by NorthSuburban Asphalt Maintenance, Inc. for crack sealing on various roads throughout Des Plaines ata unit price per pound of $1.08, and to authorize the Director of Finance, or her designee, to issuepayment to North Suburban Asphalt Maintenance, Inc. in a total amount not to exceed$25,000.00 upon receipt of invoice and approval of work completed;


Plaines, County of Cook, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows:



SECTION 2: That in the best interest of the City, the City Council hereby accepts the

bid from North Suburban Asphalt Maintenance, Inc. for crack sealing on various roads

throughout Des Plaines at a unit price per pound of $1 .0, and authorizes the Acting City

Manager to execute the contract documents.


designee, to issue payment to North Suburban Asphalt Maintenance, Inc., P.O. Box 497, Park

Ridge, Illinois 60068 in a total amount not to exceed $25,000M0, upon receipt of invoice and

approval of work completed.



PASSED this — day of , 2010.

APPROVED this

_____

day of , 2010.


MAYOR


______________________

cCITY CLERK David R. Wiltse, City Attorney

Legal\Res\2OIOCrack sealing 201() Noith Suburban Asphalt Maintenance

2

Consent Agenda Item #10

Cityof Des PlainesPublic Works and Engineering Department4Jfl 1420 Miner Street

EES PLAINES Des Plaines, IL 60016ILLINOIS 7 Tel: 847-391-5390

.‘

Fax: 847-391-5619

UM

Date: June 24, 2010

To: Jason Slowinski, Acti ty Manager

From: Timothy P. Oakley, P. ., irector of Public Works and Engineering’V

Subject: Pavement Patching and Resurfacing

Issue: Additional pavement patching and intermittent resurfacing, beyond our approved 2010 budgetamount, is necessary to maintain a reasonable driving surface on many of our streets. Savings in the 2010Contract A Street and Utility Improvements bid will permit us to repair these streets.

Analysis: Our current account balance available for asphalt street patching by our Public Works Division isapproximately $40,000; however, we have an immediate need to expend additional funds to repair, inparticular, the streets listed on the attached spreadsheet.

We propose two types of repairs based on the condition of the streets: I) permanent pavement patching byPublic Works, and 2) grinding and resurfacing by this year’s street resurfacing contractor, Arrow RoadConstruction.

Permanent patching will consist of pavement surface removal by grinding, followed by bituminous concrete(asphalt) placement. Grinding and resurfacing will consist of pavement surface removal by grinding, eitherby Public Works or Arrow Road Construction, Followed by asphalt placement by Arrow Road Construction.The type of repair is based on the condition of the street. The determination on who performs the work(Public Works, Arrow Road, or a combined effort) is based on the capability of our equipment and availablework force.

The estimated additional cost to repair the listed streets is $150,000. Arrow Road would be contracted, byamendment, for $100,000 of the work at their current contract unit prices. Public Works would have anadditional $50,000 added to the street patching material budget to complete the project. Our current patchingaccount balance of $40,000 would he used to continue pavement maintenance on City streets not listed on theattached list.

We have Capital Project funds available to ftLnd this work due to the low hid on the 2010 Contract A Streetand UIlity Improvements hid. The low hid was $1.1 million while the budgeted amount was $1.4 million.

Recommendation: We recommend a contract amendment to the current Street and Utility Improvements(MET 10-0021 0—00—RS) contract with Arrow Road Construction, 3401 South Busse Road. P.O. Box 334.Mount Prospect, IL 60056, in the amount of $1 00,000. We Further recommend addition to the 414 F CapitalMaintenance Supplies (#970904) account in the amount of $50,000 for street patching material. Source offunding would be the Capital Projects Fund.

IPO/ipo

AttachmentsStreet Repair ListContract Amendment. Arrow Road

6/24/2010

Pavement Patching and Resurfacing Addition

Street Limits Proposed Work

1 Center Oakton-Prairie PW Permanent Patch (Parade Route)

2 Henry Center -White Edge Grind- PW, 1.5 Surface- Arrow

3 Henry White-River PW Permanent Patch

4 Oakwood Cora-Center Edge Grind, Pothole patch- PW, 2” Surface- Arrow

5 Oakwood Cora-River PW Permanent Patch

6 Villa East-West PW Permanent Patch

7 Wicke White-River PW Permanent Patch Lane Width

8 Westmere Cul de Sac 2” Grind and 2’ Surface

9 Warrington Golf-Mt Propsect PW Permanent Patch Lane Width

10 Wisconsin Harvard-Amherst PW Permanent Patch

11 Drake Stratford-Amherst PW Permanent Patch

12 Jarvis Webster-Westview Edge Grind North Side and pothole patch- PW, 1.5” Surface

13 White Forest-Algonquin PW Permanent Patch

14 Walnut Jeanette-Lee PW Permanent Patch Lane Width

15 Anita Washington-Harvey PW Permanent Patch

16 Elmira Jarvis-Birchwood PW Permanent Patch

17 Maple Howard-Touhy PW Permanent Patch- Grinder Width, Possible Arrow Grind

18 Sprucewood iarvis-Birchwood Full Depth Patching 6”-PW

19 Graceland Jefferson-Willow PW Permanent Patch

20 State Stratford-Cornell IDOT (thru lanes), PW Permanent Patch (parking lanes)

21 Orchard Ct Greenview-Dead end PW Permanent Patch

22 Seminary Potter-Lyman PW Permanent Patch Lane/Full Width

23 White Oakton-Howard PW Permanent Patch

24 Howard Mt. Prospect-RR PW Fill holes and Roll patch

25 Cranbrook Mt. Prospect-Drake PW Permanent Patch

26 Berkshire Wolf-Clayton PW Permanent Patch

CITY OF DES PLAIN ESPUBLIC WORKS & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

CONTRACT AMENDMENT

CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO: ONE

CONTRACT NAME: 2010 C.I.P. STREET & UTILITY IMPROVMENTSMET 10-0021 0-00-RS

CONTRACTOR: Arrow Road Construction Company

CONTRACT DATE: May 17, 2010

AUTHORIZATION IS REQUESTED TO AMEND THE CONTRACT BY ADDINGTHE FOLLOWING:

1. $75,000 for HMA Surface Mix2. $15,000 for 2 Pavement Removal3. $10,000 for Bituminous Prime Coat

REASON FOR AMENDMENT:Addition of HMA Surface mix and Pavement Removal for street patching and resurfacing at current unit prices

AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT PRICE

Original Contract Price- $156721245

Current Contract Price- $1,567,212.45

The Contract Price, due to this Amendment, willbe increased/decreased by: $100 000 00

New Contract Price $1,667,212.45

APPROVA[S

Requested By: Jon Duddles P.E. Date:Assistant Director of Public Works & Engineering

Recommended By Timothy P. Oakley P E., CFM Date:Director of Public Works & Engineering

Approved By:

_____________________________________________

Date:Director of Finance

Approved By

_______________________________________________

DateCity Manager

CITY OF DES PLAINES


A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTRACTAMENDMENT WITH ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTIONFOR THE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTCONTRACT AS PART OF THE 2010 CAPITALIMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (MFT 10-00210-00-RS).

WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the Cityof Des Plaines to contract with individuals, associations and corporations, in any manner notprohibited by law or by ordinance; and

WHEREAS, on May 17, 2010, by Resolution R-70-1 0, the City Council approvedArrow Road Construction to perform street and utility improvements for rehabilitating orresurfacing various streets, as well as installing 8” water main, in conjunction with the 2010Capital Improvement Program, in an amount not to exceed $1,567,212.45; and

WHEREAS, additional pavement patching and intermittent resurfacing, beyond theapproved 2010 budget amount, is necessary to maintain a reasonable driving surface on manyCity streets; and

WHEREAS, the estimated additional cost to repair the additional streets is $150,000.00,which Arrow Road Construction would be contracted for an additional $100,000.00 and PublicWorks would have an additional $50,000.00 for street patching; and

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to approve a Contract Amendment withArrow Road Construction to perform additional street and utility improvements for rehabilitatingor resurfacing additional streets, in conjunction with the 2010 Capital Improvement Program, inan additional amount not to exceed $100,000.00 and to authorize the Director of Finance, or herdesignee, to issue payment to Arrow Road Construction for the additional street repairs in anamount not to exceed $100,000.00, upon receipt of invoice and approval of work completed;





SECTION 2: That in the best interest of the City, the City Council hereby approves the

Contract Amendment for the 2010 (‘IP Street and Utility Improvements Contract, MFT 10-

00-RS, with Arrow Road Construction for rehabilitating or resurfacing additional streets, in an

amount not to exceed $100,000.00, and authorizes the Acting City Manager to execute the

contract documents.


designee, to issue payment to Arrow Road Construction, 3401 South Busse Road, Mt. Prospect,

Illinois 60056 in an amount not to exceed $100,000.00, upon receipt of invoice and approval of

work completed.

SECTION 4: That this Resolution shall he in full force and effect from and after its


PASSED this

______

day of , 2010.

APPROVED this

______

day of —, 2010.


MAYOR


CITY CLERK David R. Wiltse, City Attorney

Legal\Res\2009\Conlract Amendment Arrnw Road C’onst — MFT 0-002 tO-(t0-RS

2

L3NDVJ

WIOHM3H1dO331!IJNJNOD

Committee of the Whole Agenda hem #Ia

City of Des PlainesFinance Department

\SJ ‘ Des Plaines, IL 60016DES PLANES Tel: 847-391-5300

ILLINOIS Fax: 847-391-5402

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

Date: June24, 2010

To: Jason Slowinski, Ac• ity Manager

CC: Mayor, City Counci Ci y Clerk, City Attorney, Department Directors

From: Ilana Bromber, Assistant Director of Finance

Subj: Resolution R-96-10 July 6, 2010 Warrant Register

I recommend that the above-mentioned Warrant Register be approved in the amountshown below:

Warrant Register $2,671,980.04

IB/wj


RESOLUTION

R-96-1O

Be it resolved by the City Council of theCity of Des Plaines that the following bills are

due and payable and that the Mayor andCity Clerk be and are hereby authorized

to make payment for same.

July 6, 2010

CITY OF DES PLAINESORGANIZATION CHART

FUND # FUND TITLE ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE100 GENERAL FUND 0620 ELECTED OFFICE100 GENERALFUND 0631 CITYMANAGER100 GENERAL FUND 0632 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY100 GENERAL FUND 0634 LEGAL100 GENERAL FUND 0635 MEDIASERVICES100 GENERAL FUND 0637 HUMAN RESOURCES100 GENERAL FUND 0639 HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES100 GENERAL FUND 0651 FISCAL SERVICES100 GENERAL FUND 0657 OVERHEAD-GEN FUND100 GENERAL FUND 0659 GEOGRAPHIC INFO. SYSTEMS100 GENERAL FUND 1811 ENGINEERING/GENERAL (PW & ENGINEERING DEPT)100 GENERAL FUND 1820 BLDG & CODE ENFORCEMENT100 GENERALFUND 1830 PLANNING&ZONING100 GENERAL FUND 1840 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT100 GENERAL FUND 1211 POLICE ADMINISTRATION100 GENERAL FUND 1212 POLICE UNIFORMED PATROL100 GENERALFUND 1213 POLICECRIMINALINVEST100 GENERALFUND 1214 POLICESUPPORTSERVICES100 GENERAL FUND 1221 FIREADMINISTRATION100 GENERALFUND 1222 FIREEMERGENCYSERVICES100 GENERAL FUND 1223 FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES100 GENERAL FUND 1224 EMA100 GENERAL FUND 1241 POLICE & FIRE COMMISSION100 GENERAL FUND 2451 STREET/GROUNDS MAINTENANCE100 GENERAL FUND 2453 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE DIV100 GENERALFUND 2454 PUBLICWORKSADMIN

FUND # FUND TITLE ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE201 LIBRARYFUND 2110 LIBRARYSERVICES201 LIBRARY FUND 2130 IL LIBRARY PER CAP GRANT

FUND # FUND TITLE ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE202 LIBRARY CAPITAL PROJECTS 202F LIBRARY CAPITAL PROJECTS

FUND # FUND TITLE ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE203 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 203F MOTOR FUEL TAX

FUND # FUND TITLE ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE204 HUD:COM DEV BLOCK GRANT 204F HUD:COM DEV BLOCK GRANT

FUND # FUND TITLE ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE205 TI.F. #1 DOWNTOWN 205F T.I.F. #1 DOWNTOWN

FUND # FUND TITLE ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE206 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS 206F EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

FUND # FUND TITLE ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE208 DPPD SEIZED ASSETS FUND 208F DPPD SEIZED ASSETS208 DPPD SEIZED ASSETS FUND 2081 FORFEITURE ACCOUNT208 DPPD SEIZED ASSETS FUND 2082 CUSTOM ASSETS208 DPPD SEIZED ASSETS FUND 2083 DEA ACCOUNT

FUND # FUND TITLE ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE210 T.I.F. #3W. WILLE RD 210F T.I.F. #3 WILLE ROAD

FUND # FUND TITLE ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE212 T IF. #5 PERRY/LEE 212F T.I.F. #5 PERRY/LEE

FUND #213

FUND #214

FUND #230230230

FUND #414

FUND #501

FUND502502502502502

FUND #503

FUND #604

FUND #625

FUND #701

FUND#702702702702702

FUND #703

FUND #705

FUND #706

FUND #707

FUND TITLET.I.F #6 MANNHEIM/HIGGINS

FUND TITLET.IF. #4 FIVE CORNERS

FUND TITLEGRANT FUNDED PROJECTSGRANT FUNDED PROJECTSGRANT FUNDED PROJECTS

FUND TITLECAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS

FUND TITLEMETRA LEASED PARKING FUND

FUND TITLEWATER/SEWER FUNDWATER/SEWER FUNDWATER/SEWER FUNDWATER/SEWER FUNDWATER/SEWER FUND

FUND TITLECITY OWNED PARKING FUND

FUND TITLEESCROW FUND

FUND TITLE125 CAFETERIA PLAN

FUND TITLERISK MANAGEMENT FUND

FUND TITLEEQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTEQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTEQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTEQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTEQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT

FUND TITLEI T REPLACEMENT FUND

FUND TITLEHEALTH BENEFITS FUND

FUND TITLECOMPENSATED ABSENCES

FUND TITLELIBRARY COMPENSATED ABS

ORGANIZATION #5011

ORGANIZATION #06551812502350245025

ORGANIZATION #5013

ORGANIZATION #604F

ORGANIZATION #625F

ORGANIZATION #701F

ORGANIZATION #702F702170227023

702304

ORGANIZATION #703F

ORGANIZATION #70SF

ORGANIZATION #706F

ORGANIZATION #707F

CiTY OF DES PLAINES

ORGANIZATION CHART

ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE213F T.I.F. #6 MANNHEIM/HIGGIN

ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE214F T.I.F. #4 FIVE CORNERS

ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE2310 PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS2320 CAPITAL GRANTS2330 OTHER GRANTS

ORGANIZATION # ORGANIZATION TITLE414F CAPITAL PROJECTS

_____________

ORGANIZATION TITLEMETRA LEASED LOTS

_____________

ORGANIZATION TITLEFISCAL SERVICES/WATERENGINEERING/WATER (PW & ENGINEERING DEPT)WATER SYSTEMSPW - WATER - PLANTSEWER SYSTEMS

_____________

ORGANIZATION TITLECITY OWNED PARKING OPS

______________

ORGANIZATION TITLEESCROW

______________

ORGANIZATION TITLECAFETERIA PLAN

_____________

ORGANIZATION TITLERISK MANAGEMENT

_____________

ORGANIZATION TITLEEQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTEQUIPMENT REPCMNT - WATERFIRE DEPT EQUIP REPLCMNTPOLICE DEPT EQUIP RPLCMNTSHORT TERM EQUIPMENT LOAN

_____________

ORGANIZATION TITLEI T REPLACEMENT

_____________

ORGANIZATION TITLEHEALTH BENEFITS

_____________

ORGANIZATION TITLECOMPENSATED ABSENCES

_____________

ORGANIZATION TITLELIBRARY COMPENSATED ABS

SUNGAIlI’ I’t3NI’AMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTiNG

DATE: 06/24/10

TIME: 14:03:52

CIJY OF DES PIATNES

CAST REQI) II? EMENrS 1311 1, I, 151’

‘AGO: NUMBI3I)

AC(’I’PAY’(

ACC’DUN’I’ INC Pill IDE) 6 / 1 0

SELECTION (‘RITI)RIA piiyable.dueda)c’ 07/06/2010”

FUND 100 ()i)NERAL FUND

ORGANiZATION ACCOUNT - -- TiTLE - - VENI)DR - PI)RCIIAItE Oft I NYU T CE RI’I’NO SAIA1S ‘TA)) AMOUNT

‘TOTAL ElECTED DII” ICE

TOTAL CITY MANAGER

TOTAL I NFORMA’l’ ON TECHNOlOGY

920120 COMMUNICATION SE 05851

970270 PRINTING-REPROII 08292

SPRINT

PRESS’rECN

655730511300 415 0.00

24003 395 0.00

0.00 36049.21

0.00 671.02

0.00 15582,25

‘OTAL MEDIA SERVICES

OTAL hUMAN RESOIiRCES

0.00 150.31

0.00 837.97

0620

0620

0620

0620

0620

9201 10

920120

920120

030030

030590

20 0.))))

41’? 0.00

379 0.00

3)) 0.00

21.11 0.00

1 St).(t0

60.62

33)6.5’)

5. 1)0

06,00

0631 920120

0631 970100

0631 9/0270

0631 971)620

0632 920120

0632 930010

0632 930110

0632 930110

0632 970116

0632 970115

0632 970115

0632 970900

PROFESSIONAL SEE

COMMUNICATION SE

COMMUNICATION SE

N S M VEHICLES

MISCEI,IJNEOIIS EX

COMMUN I [‘All ON SI)

OF)’ ICE SUPPLIES

PIll N’I’ING 1(50900

SUI3SCITIPTIONS &

COMMUNICATION SE

I) & M EQUIPMENT

It & M SOFTWARE

R & M SOFTWARE

SUPPLIES: IIEPT/O

SOPPLI ES: DEPT/O

SUPPLIES: DEPT/C

EQUIPMENT <$500

LEGAL FEES: LARD

LEGAL FEES: LARD

LEGAL FEES: LARD

COMMUNICATION SE

SUBSCRIPTIONS &

SUBSCRIPTIONS &

100001

05851

00(151

10291

02670

05)15 1

102 ‘/98

08292

10S435

06851

100279

05124

11356

05124

100279

100279

05851

105659

105659

25529

05851

03363

03363

AlL CII) [‘0 1 NC’Ol3 l’))RA’I’l)

S PIt TNT

S PR) NI’

DES PLAINES (‘AR MARl)

(‘11131 RI F I El) PIT I NI’ AN))

iII’11 IN’i’

Ill NCI( I ICY S Ph? 1 NI) WAlER

PRICSS’I’I)ChI

LOCALOOVNEWS . ORG

SPRINT

(JARVEY S OFF ICE PIUS

C I) W GOVERNMEN’I’ TNCO

N 5 1) I , INCOEPORATEI)

C 0 W GOVERNMENT INCO

GARVI)Y’S OFFICE I’LUS

GARVEY S OFFICE P1,11))

SPRINT

KATHI,1)EN W BOND CSR L

KATHLEEN W BOND CSR I

KLEIN, THORPE AND 1EN

SPRINT

WEST GROUP

WEST DROOP

MAY ,I tIN :3(31))

655’? 3051 1100

1,557 3)1511)00

APRIl, 20)0

560)33

655/TIISIIIOO

01.10 161,/B’,)

24003

‘2420l0

6657.30511100

1 (5110

SI’X3251

92)49370

SWTOS38

138844

139:45/

655’/305)) 1 00

5042

5026

147323

655730611100

820600274

820773628

4)6 (1,00 81.22

203 (1.0)) 84.70

103 0.00 2000

119 0.00 460.00

381 0.00 125082

‘100 0.00 315.00

73 0,00 2409.76

24 0.00 10968.49

69 0.00 430.62

96 0.00 28.68

106 0.00 79.00

.362 0.00 99.99

1634

3634

1634

1634

3634

)634

rOTAL LEGAL

920103

920303

920103

920120

970620

970620

12:3 0.00

122 0.00

124 0.00

380 0.00

214 0.00

221 0.00

0. 00

606.25

452.00

3737.44

56.45

492. 82

75.00

5419.96

130.31

20.00

‘637 920120 COMMUNiCATION SE 05851 SPRINT 655730511100 401 0.00 87.22

637 960040 EMPLOYEE PIIYSICA 05274 ILlINOIS STATE POLICE MAY 2010 193 0.00 650.75

637 960040 EMPLOYEE PHYSIC?) 106122 ALEXIA14 BRO1’NEITS CORP 367215 15 0.00 50.00

‘637 960040 EMPLOYEE PHYSICA 106122 ALEXIAN BROTHERS CORP 366911 16 0.00 50.00

639 920120 COMMUNICATION SE 05891 SPRINT 659730511100 400 0.00 134,74

639 920520 SUBSIOY:COMMUNTY 08167 OAKTON PAVILLION 0615-10 146 0.00 750.00

639 920520 SUBSIOY:COMMUNTY 100289 Z-ROSE PRODUCTIONS 9285 297 0.00 180.00

RUN DATE 06/24/2010 TIME 14:03:58 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC FUND ACCOONTING

SUNDAE)) ‘((NIAMAl IC/N N) I’UN)) A1’C’(ll)N) N)

DATE /:‘‘i / 1

TIME: 14:01:52

CITY OF DES PLAINES

GAS)) REQU I )IEMIINT5 31 LL LI ST

ACE NEIM (lIE 2

ACC1’Pl(Y

A(’(’OONF I NC (El) (10 1,/ I

SELEC’)I ON (‘IC I TIlE IA: pIlyib C’. ((U/C diii “1)7/06/2010”

FUND EDO ()ENI:RAI FUND

ORGAN) ZA’I’ 1)1)1 AC(’OUN’I ‘rIFlE-: -VENDOR ------ PURCHASE 01) INVOICE ))RCNO SAI1(S’I/LX AMOUNT

TOTAL I- [SCAt SERVICES

0 (II)

0 00 100.42

0639 020(20 SUE3.9IUYI’OMMUN’lY 106410 PARK RIDUE TAXI & LIV 1019 (20 0.00 30.40

0639 ‘)::oSSo SUBSIDY SR )ITZIIN 05994 AMERICAN CHARGE SERVI 05 25 2010 90 0. 01) 10. 00

0639 92(11 1,0 (CURS I (IV (CI) (‘‘(ZEN 1 06440 PAlE K N I DDE TAX I & LIV 1 01 9 424 0 - 00 1 506 1 1)

0039 ‘/10190 UNIFLJ)MO/API’AREI. 1 02021 DEERFIII)D AC’FIVXWEAR 2571 C 0.00 1 (0.00

TOTAL HI:AIT( I S I IOWAN SERV ICE-CS2 9(1 - 24

0651 420 (20 COMMON ICATION SE 0’851 SPRINT 655730511100 406 0.00 165.113

0651 9(0100 UI-I-ICR SUI’I’I,IES 09638 OFFICE DEPOT 521509141 001 1 3’) 0.00 2. ‘37

0691 01011,)O OFT-ICR SUI’I’LII(S 09636 OFFICE DEPOT 520636475001 1.32 0.00 10.62

0651 970100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 09638 OFFICE DEPOT 520233907001 13] 0.00 20.38

0691 970100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 09638 OFFiCE DEPOT 520636474001 335 0.00 20./8

0657 920121) (‘OMMI(NICA’I’ION SE 101343 CALL (INK 06 15 10 /8 0.00 8061. )/

065) 920120 COMMUNICATION SE 10/140 PACIFIC ‘I’ElEMANAGEMEN 200050 38.) 1.1)0 1,1.00

0657 ‘1204211 SUIISIDY:IIl.9l’ORIC 16)10 DES PLATNES IJISTORICA JUL 2010 26 0.00 (33)31

0657 920648 SUBSIDY: TEAR TO 04(129 CITY OF DES I’LAINES JULY 2010 30 0.0)) 1351 .09

0657 920640 50)35104’: ‘FRAN ‘10 04829 CITY OF DES P)J1,IREIS JULY 2020 35 0.1)0 3966,29

0657 9201398 SUB5JOV ‘JEAN TO 06135 CITY OF DES PLAINES JULY 2020 36 0,11)1 64.17

0657 920840 SUBSIDY TRAN ‘I’D 06135 CITY OF OES PLA.INES JULY 2030 3_I 0.110 92.76

TOTAL IIVEICIIIIAI) DEN EUROo 00 15033.12

100 40/000 OVERPAYMENTS/UTI OB001044 COLOWELL BANKER REFUND 276 0.00 6.55

100 407000 OVERPAYMENTS/UTI UBOOIOO5 I3AIINIIR, M REFUN)) 214 0.00 55.96

100 40/000 OVERPAYMEN’l’S/UTI U0001046 NAIl, YODN SUNG REFUND 235 0.00 73.98

100 830500 REAL ESTATE THAN 203069 MATTHEW & MONICA KRDP REFUND 06-30 225 0.00 520.00

100 830300 VEHICLE LICENSES 01902 SALVATION ARMY REFUND 06 10 253 0.00 25.00

100 830100 VEHICLE LICENSES 200438 EDWARD E. PEPLOWSKI REFUND 06-10 2’)3 0.00 25.00

100 830100 VEHICLE LICENSRS 108575 LINDA WAIJDEL REFUNI) 06 10 228 0.00 10.00

100 830100 VEIIICLE LICENSES 108571 WIESLAW SZYMULSKI )ZEFUNI) 05-10 250 0.00 20.00

100 830100 VEHICLE LICENSES 106578 DUSAN CVETKOVIC REFUND 06 10 71 0.00 2000

100 830100 VEHICLE LICENSES 108579 DANIEL STASZAIC REFUND 06 10 249 0.00 1000

100 830100 VEHICLE LICENSES 108580 JEANIE ANZALOUA REFUND 0610 8 0.00 10.00

300 830100 VEHiCLE LiCENSES 108581 bUy MY PET REFUND 06 10 119 0.00 50.00

100 830300 VEHICLE LICENSES 108582 ESTANTSLAO NEGRETE REFOND 06-10 180 0.00 20.00

100 830100 VEHICLE LICENSES 108585 JONATHAN KLEIN REFUND 06-10 112 0.00 ID DO

100 830100 VEHICLE LICENSES 108586 KARA J VANCIL REFUND 06-10 226 0.00 10.00

100 830100 VEHICLE LICENSES 108587 JAMES L METE REFUND 05 10 18/ 0 00 25 00

100 030100 VEHICLE LICENSES 108590 VASANT SI-IAN REFUND 06 10 366 0.00 30.00

100 830100 vEHICLE LICENSES 108591 JEFF CIRA REFUND 0630 49 0.00 60.00

100 830400 PET LICENSES 104420 MARTIN J MOYLAN REFUND 06-10 183 0.0)1 5.00

100 840100 BUILDING PERMITS 108556 ALBERS EXTERIORS REFUND 06-ID 11 0.00 35.00

100 840100 RUTIDITO PERMITS 108573 CHUCK’S CONSTRUCTION REFUND 06-10 62 0 00 35.00

100 850101 0110 FINES:OIRECT 108576 ANNA EWAPIEN 1/EFIINO 06-10 129 0,00 25.00

100 850234 NONRESIOENI’ AMBIJ 1085/4 ALLSTATE 358441 7 0.00 680 00

100 899900 MISCELLANEOUS RE 108588 HAIL REPAIR GUYS REFUND 06-10 91 0,00 50.00

RUN DATE 06/24/2010 TIME 34:03:58 SIJNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING

SUNGARD I’ICNI’AMAT ION I NC’ PIINI) AI’( 1)1 IN’)’ I N)

DATE: 06/24/IC)

TIME: 14:03:52

(‘I ‘IV OF Dliii P1,71 I NIifi

C’I\SII (ROIl II1IIMENTII DIII

PAGE NUMBER: 3

ACCTI’AY 1

ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/10

SELECTION [‘N I TEN I A pay:ib ‘ . dm’ di 7: 07 / 06 / 201 o

FUND 100 IJENERJL FUNI)

ORGANIZATION ACCOUNT ‘1111,1 - VENDOR PURCHASE ON INVOICE RECNO SALES TAX AMOUNT

TOTAL OENII1AI, FOND

920120 COMMUNICATION SE 05851 SPRINT

0.00 179) .7,0

0. 00

0.00

0.00

655730911100 434 0.00 395.91

1211 920120 I’IMMI)Nl(’ATION SE 1)7,11’: I NP)? NI 6557705111 01) 178 0.00 271 .20

1211 97010(1 OVFI17 Sl.lI’IIIIiN 100279 OARVIiYS OI”FIC’IC IllS 1.16981 95 0.00 120.74

1 211 970111 SIJI’I’I,IIiS : UXP’l/fl 05124 C (1 W IIOVICRNMENT IN[’l 55M7604 72 0.00 65.44

TOTAL (‘001 CI: AIIM I NI S’[RA’rl ON 457 . 38

1212 920120 CCIMMUNI(’ATION SI 051(51 SPJ(INT 6557.105)1100 177 0.00 105) . 15

1212 920204 TRAINING 07434/ COLOIiIIIi OF DL1l’AGE SLE052410016 27 0.00 200.00

1212 9’IOllS SUPPLiES: UEPT/O 108573 MILES TECHNOLOGIES IN 1001648 184 0.00 246.69

1212 970270 PRINTING REPROD 08292 I’RESSTECII 24003 397 0.00 60,00

TOTAL (‘001CR IjNIFORMLCI) P1111(01, 1557.84

1213 920120 COMMUNICATION SE (15951 SPRINT 655730511100 376 0.00 826.10

1213 960990 MiSC CONTRACTUAl 104942 TRANS UNION 1,LC 05058427 353 0.00 59.06

1213 960991) MISC CONTRACTUAL (04054 CEN’l’IFION CORPORATION 44605 70 0.00 108.95

1213 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAl 108314 LEXISNEXIS 1(15K DATA 20100531 101 0.00 237.95

1213 9’70I 00 UFIICE SUPPLIES I 002/9 GARVEY’S OlFICE PIUS 140543 207 0.00 388.64

TOTAL f’OLTCE CRIMINAL INVEST 1620.70

1214 920120 COMMUNICATION SE 05851 SPRINT 65573051)300 375 0.00 567.71

0214 920)20 CONMUNICATION NIl (0/140 PACIFIC TELEM/INAGEMEN 200050 392 0.00 150.00

1214 930010 N & M EQUIPMENT 21689 PORTER LEE CORPORATIO 9233 271 0.00 502.00

1214 930030 R & N VEIIICIFS 04839 ROYAL TOUCh CAT? WASH 1094 422 0.00 60.00

1214 930030 N & M VEIIICLES 18291 UES PLAINES CAR WASII APRIL 2010 33 0.00 280.00

1214 930030 N & M VEHICLES 1829) DES PLAINES CAR WASH MAY 2010 32 0.00 230.00

1214 960020 DISPOSITION C)F A 98930 A B C HUMANE WILDLIFE 112815 21 0.00 55.00

1214 960020 DISPOSITION OF A 98930 A B C HUMANE WILDlIFE 112787 13 0.00 55.00

1214 960020 UISPOS)TION OF A 98930 A B C HUMANE WILDLIFE 112791 14 0.00 35.00

12)4 968020 DISPOSITION OF A 98930 A B C NUMANE WILDLIFE 112812 17 0.00 55.00

1214 960020 DISPOSITION OF A 98930 A B C IIUI4ANE WILDLIFE 112077 12 0.00 55.00

1214 960030 TOW/STOILAOE/ABAN 02929 SCHIMKA AUTO WRECKERS 06-01-20)0 248 0.00 160.00

1214 960030 TOW/STORAGE/ABAN 06825 TRI N SERVICE MAY 2010 234 0.00 120.00

12)4 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAL 108124 SHRED-IT 21391785 245 0.00 189.00

1214 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAL 108)24 SHRED-IT 21362788 247 0.00 60.00

1214 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAL 108124 SNRED IT 21362789 246 0.00 60.00

1214 970100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 100279 GARVEY’S OFFICE PLUS 141076 94 0.00 7.58

1214 970140 POLICE RANGE 106538 EAGLE POINT GUN/T J M 3987 23 0.00 9800.00

1214 970260 POSTAGE AND PARC 108589 INSIGHT MEDIA C077301-CM 197 0.00 -159.00

1214 970260 POSTAGE AND PARC 108589 INS1OHT MEDIA L077301 IN 398 0.00 368.54

1214 970270 PRINTING-REPROD 01233 P F PETTIBONE & CDMPA 20136 269 0.00 257.80

1214 970620 SUBSCRIPTIONS & 03363 WEST GROUP 820721665 217 0.00 305.70

1214 980600 FURNITURE & FIXI 100279 GARVEY’S OFFICE PLIIS 137658 97 0.00 185.40

TOTAL POLICE SUPPORT SERViCES 0.00 12999. ‘73

1221

RUN DATE 06/24/2010 TIME 14:03:58 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC - FUND ACCOUNTING

SUNGAI4D IICNI’AMICIION INC FoND ACCOUNTING

DATE: 06/24/10

TIME: 14:03:52

CCIV Dl’ DES PLAINER

CASH ((EQU I REMENTS 13 (LI I I SI

PAlO: NUMIIIll 4

AI’C’I’I’AY I

AC’C’I)UNI I ND PER ODD: S / 10

SELEC1ION CR I ‘111(3 IA: piy0ble . due d( e “07/06/2010”

FUND I (((1 GENERAl. lUND

ORC3ANI EAT I ON ACCOUNT ----Ti’ILF VENDOR PURChASE OR I NVOJ CE IO1(NCI SAI,hiS (‘AX AMOUNT

0. 00

0.00

TOTAL FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES 0.00

920120 COMMUNICATION SE 05851 SPNTNT 655730511100 409 0 00 93 47

IOTAI. ENGINEERING/GENERAL 0 00

1221 920201 ‘IRAINING

1221 920220 MEMBERSHIP DUES

1221 970270 P11 INTIND NEPRDI) -

TOTAL F I NIl AIIM (NI SINAI I ON

6.330

20)0

2 ‘1 003

(71 (1.00

1/3 0,00

39(, 0,00

1222

1222

1222

1222

1222

1222

1222

1222

1222

1222

1222

1222

1222

1222

1222

3222

1222

1222

08103

00373

08292

05851

1 01727

18/01

303054

21 ‘/11

18291

305610

106122

106122

09638

04086

1 07101

17132

95309

106637

106637

1 06631

24812

‘32(112(1

920204

920204

930010

030010

930030

930200

96(104 0

960040

970100

970115

9_loll S

9/0315

970115

970190

9/01 90

970 190

970310

N I P 5 1 A

NW ASSOC PROV1DEI( EMS

PI1ESS’I’IE:II

SF13 (NI

I lIE lILA (NI ND 5111501 ((IC

FIRE INVEST 10)510115 ST

BREATH I NO A Ill SYSTEMS

NOVAK & (‘ARICICE

DES P1./lINES CAll WASH

H P PRODUCTS

ALEX (AN BROT1(EI1S CDIII’

ALEX IAN I3ROTI(FRS 011(1 P

OFFICE DEPOT

WELDING iNDUSTRIAL SI)

IIAT’IER IFS PIUS

MENAIU)S

ACE DES PLAINES INCOI(

ADVANCE MARKING SYSTE

ADVANCE MARKING SYS’I’X

ADVANCE MARKING SYSI’S

ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY

SPRINT

BUILDING & FIRE CODE

FIRE INVESTIGATORS ST

FIRE INVESTIGATORS ST

GREAT GLACIER (NCORPD

COMMON I CATION SE

TRAINING

TRAINING

N & N EQU(PMICN’l

N & N EQU I (:MFNT

(3 & M VEHICLES

RENTALS & (EASES

EMPLOYEE PHYSICA

EMPLOYEE PHYS ICA

OFFTCE SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES: DEPT/D

SUPPLIES: DEPT/O

SUPPLIES: DEPT/0

SUPPLIES: DEPT/O

UNI FORMS/APPAREL

UN.I FORMS/APPAREL

UNIFORMS/APPAREL.

SUPPLIES EQUIP

COMMUNICATION

TRAINING

TRAI RING

MEMBERSHIP DUES

OFFICE SUPPLIES

TOTAL FIRE EMERGENCY SERV1CES

6S)305IlI0l( ‘1113 0,01)

20(0 I 00(1 206 0.00

MAY 19, 2010 151 0.00

10103,40 43 0.00

3031734 175 0.00

MAY 2010 69 0.00

107136095 ‘147 0,00

.166714 4/, 0.00

366605 44 0.00

520/14255001 145 0.00

11(51568 225 0.00

204451 338 0.00

6171 ‘(40 0.00

211(191 65 0.00

(-170532 1 47 0.00

I ‘17(3528 I 48 0.00

1 170529 1 46 0.00

18216 22 0.00

655730511100 402 0.00

46939 164 0.00

MAY 19, 20(0 159 0.00

6/10 s/li 202 0,00

1668 209 0.00

1223

1223

1223

1223

1223

920120

920204

920204

920220

970100

51). 00

50 00

20. 01)

DII. ‘11

392,44

85.00

10.00

28 01)

11,1 .50

5. 00

100.00

618.00

492. 00

684 .12

140. 20

249.88

29.80

67.81

3.15

201 .913

82/0

201 . 00

3576.18

164 - SI

295.00

90. 00

75. 00

37.50

662.01

282.51

1118.58

625.00

180.75

72.88

2279.59

SE 05853

100572

48703

48703

105789

TC’TAL EMA

1224 920120 COMMUNICATiON SE 05851 SPRINT 6557.30511100 431 000

1224 930010 R & M EQUIPMENT 02365 BRANIFF COMMuNICATION 22009 42 0.00

1224 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAl. 108265 TODD MARSHALL 105 108 0.00

1224 970190 UNIFORMS/APPAREL 19300 RAY O’HEI(RON CO INC 0 23366 268 0.00

1224 970190 UNIFORMS/APPAREl 19300 RAY O’HERRON CD INC 0 23244 259 0.00

0.00

920110 PROFESSIONAL SEA 107699 THOMPSON ELEVATOR INS 10-1864 230 0.00 ‘/5.00

920110 PROFESSIONAl. SEN 101699 THOMPSON ELEVATOR INS 10-1828 236 0.00 (835 00

920120 COMMUNICATION 511 05852 SPRINT 655730511100 414 0 00 481.91

RUN DATE 06/24/2010 TIME 14:03:59 SUNGARO PENTAMAT1ON INC - FUNO ACCOIINT:ND

SUNGARI) lENTAMATI ON INC FUN!) ACCOONr I NO

IJATE 116 I:’! / 0

TIME. 14 1)1:52

C CY OF DES PLAINES

CAN! IC IOQU I CEMENTS 1311 L LI sr

PAGE NUMI)ER:

ACCTPAY1

ACCOUNT I NO PER .101): £11 0

SEIEC’r(IN (‘IC ‘lEN Ill: pCIyIbI’ du: IaI. “07/06/2010”

FUND 101) GENERAL FUND

ACCOUNI

920)20 COMMUNICATION E 0585] SPRINT

VENDOIC - PURCHASE OR INVOICE RECNO SALES TAX AMOIINT

0. 00

0. 00

655730511100 412 0.00 22.71

TOTAL ICCIINOM IC DEVELOPMENT 0.00

11 lIEORGAN I ElI’!’ ION

1820

1820

1820

1820

1820

1820

1820

1820

TOTAL 131.1)11 & CODE ENFORCEMENT

1830

1830

1830

1830

3830

1830

9300:30 N S M VEIIICI.I0S 1829! DES PLAINES CAR WAS!! APRIL 2010 28 0.00 25.00

9.3(1030 N S M VE)IIC1.,ES 18291 DES PLAINES CAR WASH MAY 2010 6) 0.00 10.00

95)1)90 MISC )‘INTICAU’TIJAI 104 )81 511231)) M CEN’rRoNE FF19 APR 2010 80 0.00 370. 01)

97(119)) OFFICE IIIIPI’I,ILCS 09631) OFFICE 010101 521689921001 136 0.00 2..!. 51

971)100 OFFICE SUPPlIES 1)9636 DFI’ICIC DEPOT 52078841)5001 140 0.00 ‘19.29

97011)0 OFFICE SUPPLIES 09638 OFFICE I3EPOT 520641147001 13’! 0.00 28.13

970! 00 OFFICE SUI’I’I,IES I 05789 GREAT GLACIER JNCORI’O 1667 208 0.00 19.75

970271) PRINTING REPRO!) 1)8292 PRESS’I7CH 24003 394 0.00 20. 00

2938.02

‘32(1120 COMMUNICATION SE 05853 SPRINT 655730511100 413 0.00 70.07

920220 MEMRERSIIIP DUES 101927 AMERICAN PLANNING ASS 116885100207 19 0.00 686.00

920220 MEMBERSHIP 00105 107187 INTL ECONOMIC DEVELOP 2010-11 189 0.00 345.1)0

960990 MISC CONmJ\C’rUAL 304386 SHARI M CIONTRONE FEB-APR 2010 79 0.00 1117.50

970100 OFFICE SLIPI’LIICS 09638 OFFICE OEPOT 520465246001 138 0.00 6.88

970270 PRINTING REPI1OI) 08292 PRESSTECH 24003 393 0.00 20.00

2245.45TOTAL I’I.ANNINO & ZONING

1840

22.71

2451 920110 PROFESSIONAL SER 704648 PERFECT CLEANING SEICV 31445 429 0.00 650.00

2451 920)11) PROFESSIONAL SEN 104648 PERFECT CLEANING SERV 31445 431 0.00 2400.00

245) 920)10 PROFESSIONAL SEN 104648 PERFECT CLEANING SERV 31445 430 0.00 1535.00

2451 920120 COMMUNICATION SE 05851 SPRINT 655730511100 374 0.00 456.00

2451 920145 JULIE. FEES 09757 JULIE, INC. 05-30-0435 323 0.00 209.18

2451 930020 R & M BIDGS & ST 02989 BEDCO INC 16135 339 0.00 269.60

2451 930020 R & M BLD0S & ST 02989 BEDCO INC 16136 341 0.00 539.20

2451 930020 I? & M IILDGS & ST 104933 RELIANCE PLUMBING, SE 420092 255 0.00 356.00

2451 930020 N & M BLDGS & ST 107678 COLLEY ELEVATOR COMPA 97657 336 0.00 257,50

2451 930020 R & M BLDGS & ST 107678 COLLEY ELEVATOR COMPA 97658 334 0.00 381.10

2451 930070 R & M STREET LIG 04422 B & H ELECTRIC COMPAN 17255 326 0.00 438.70

2451 930210 RENTAL OF EQUIPM 100268 THOMPSON RENTAL STAT) 448170 244 0.00 51.22

2451 930210 RENTAL OF EQUIPM 100268 THOMPSON RENTAL STATI 447842 215 0.00 179.82

2451 930480 DISPOSAL/DEBRIS 108083 ARC DISPOSAL & RECYCL 500 6 0.00 282.24

2451 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAL 100377 RANDALL INDUSTRIES I 106991 382 0.00 730,00

2451 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAL 101864 WHITE WAY SIGN & MAIN CD2008043323 223 0.00 66.23

2451 960990 MiSC CONTRACTUAL 103760 PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGIE 10260 423 0.00 301.00

2451 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAL 304942 TRUGREEN 301707 240 0.00 199.95

2451 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAL 104942 TRUGREEN 301706 239 0.00 865.85

2451 960990 M)SC CONTRACTUAL 104942 TRUGREEN 301801 243 0.00 977.43

2451 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAL 104942 TRUGREEN 301800 241 0.00 3139 72

245]. 960990 MISC CONTRAC’IUAL. 104942 TRUGREEN 301705 242 0.00 3221.51

2451 960990 MTSC CONTRACIUAL 45282 ANDERSON PEST SOLUTIO 1396481 4 0.00 36 00

2451 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAL 45282 ANDERSON PEST SO1UTIO 1396480 5 0.00 56.50

2451 960990 MiSC CONTRACTUAL 46602 GEN POWER • R16574 317 0.00 1280.24

2451 970160 TOOLS AND HARDWA 17132 MENARDS 16292 179 0.00 11.45

RUN DATE 06/24/2010 ‘riME 14:03:59 SUNGARO PENTAI’IATION INC ‘ FUND ACCOUN’I’ING

SUNGARL3 pt:N’J’AMATION INC ION!) />CI’OIINTlNII

DAlE: 06/24/10

TIME: 14:03:52

C I ‘IV III” DEN ‘I 11 NIlE

011011 I1IIQU 1 RIIMI!N’I’S HI ii, I I

1/>01) NUMBER: 6

AC’C’I’I’AYl

ACCOUNTING PERIOD 6 / 10

SELECTION (‘I) ‘I’ERIA: pybI c duc’ d.iC u “01/05/2010”

FUND 100 ciL:NERAI, lUND

ORGAN I SAT I ON AC’COUN’I’ ‘I’! ‘[Ill VI)N11001 I’Ull(’11/)SIl UI) INVOICE l>l’:c’NO SA1,ES TAX AMOUNT

TOTAt. STREET/GROUNDS MA IN’>’0 00 28452 66

249) 911) I (,0 ‘COOlS ANT) ITAIIIIWA Ill 12 MICNAI1II)) 1 6691 1 ‘18 0,00 182 56

2451 9/01 611 ‘1001,5 AN!) )IARDWA 2002) I >411550 POWER I)QU1 PMIIN’l’ /52909 264 0.00 10/.40

2453 9/0170 ,TANI’I’OIlIAI, Oil) I’’ I’IlR’I’II”IIIO i,AIII)l)A’I’URI>i 521023 >10 0,00 160.69

2451 “1701 10 ,IAN lION IA), 21)695 IIIINGL’ ‘AlOE (‘C)MI’ANY, 664698 262 0.00 57.20

2451 9/0170 2111411014 IA!, 21)555 RUNGI’! I’APIIR Cl)Ml’ANY, 661646 26! 0.00 494.07

2451 970170 JAN I ‘TON IAI, 20(96 IIUNIJI) PAP!)!) COMPANY, 662633 2)3 0.00 400 . 16

2451 910190 IIN1 PoTlWs/1\T’I’ANI’:I. 10:/021 DEEI1FI OLD ACT’! V1:WEAR 2550 332 0.00 02,50

2451 1/0222 S7’NEEmPAPS: GUI’!’ 0100/ 110810 D>’:I’Dl’ 01)0011’ 01:!! 502:1382 149 0.00 193 . so

2451 970222 S’I’Iil)I1’l’I1CAIOI SUI’D 10.1915 KIMBALl. MIDWEST 3502713 129 0.00 83.30

2451 970222 ST!1EI’l’SCAPII 5000 11>05)9 01)140114 INDDE’l’RIAI. SlIP 43050 325 0.00 580.80

2051 97022) RES’l’OIlITION .901’!” 02611! 0050110’ S INS’ 30453 30’! 0.00 007. ‘/4

2451 970223 RESTORATION SUP>’ 02630! l•’OSCIIE’S INC 14420 270 0.00 355.27

2451 97022) RESTORATION SOP!’ 02618 I”ESCFII)’S INC 14626 435 0.00 38.27

2451 970223 I)ES’I’ORATION SUP!’ 0261>! PESCIIE’S INC 14524 033 0.00 44.97

2451 9/0223 RIlS’I’DRA’t’ION SUP!’ 02611> PTISCHE’S INC 14426 ‘136 0.00 30.11

2451 97022.0 1105’rORATION SlIP!’ 0261!! I’RSCIII4’S INC 14522 434 0.00 191.13

2451 9/022) NES’I’ORA’T’ION /1001’ 026!)) PONCHO’S INC 14435 437 0.00 101.90

2451 970223 IlXS’I’ORA’T’ION SOT’!’ 02638 PESCIIII’S INC 74422 438 0.00 101 .18

2451 970223 RES’I’ORA’I’ION SUP!” 02618 PESCIIE’S INC 14055 216 0.00 224.85

245) 97022) RESTORATION SOT”!” 08636 ACE DOS PLAINES iNCUR 218237 166 0,00 9.04

2451 970223 IIES’COIUI’ClflN SIll’)’ 1 06160 l,ORVEY LANDSCAPE 8001” 0624460 306 0.00 3/7 .50

2451 970240 81141101’ AND ‘I’IlAFI” 001,1)1 ‘111101)0 81 NOSiNESS 11000 5528073 237 0,00 342.00

2451 9/0250 SUI’Pi,II1S: STREET 0463) ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTI 22226MB 358 0.00 117.13

2451 9/025>1 SUPI’LIllS: STROll’]’ 041,33 ARROW ROAD CDNS’rRuC’I’l 222668114 57 0.00 873.97

2401 970250 SUPPLIES: STROll’]’ 11461.3 ARROW I/OAI3 CONS’I’I1UC’l’l 22324MB 58 0.00 270. 3,)

2451 970250 SUPT’I,IES: S’I’I4ICIC]’ 04633 1114110W ROAI) CONSTRUCT’! 22300MB 59 0,00 598.37

2451 9/0320 SUPPLIES, PLOD 14 00189 ANDERSON LOCK CO IT’D 615752 3 0.00 13.00

2451 970320 SUPPLIES, BLOC! 14 01004 DIAMOND P113101’ COMPANY 184020 38 0.00 47.99

2451 970320 SUPPLIES: Bl,UU N 024)6 NORTHWEST E1,ECTRTCAL, 98341)7 347 0.00 710.76

2451 970320 SUPPI,ILIS: BlDG TI 02436 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL. 98387’/ 349 0.00 88,43

2451 970320 SUPPLIES: 101,00 Ii 02436 NORTHWEST ElECtRICAl, 983575 348 0.00 254,04

2451 970320 SUPPLIES: I1LDD 14 02436 NORTHWEST ELIIC’I’RJCAL 9835/1 350 0.00 -355.38

2451 9’/0320 SUPPLIES: B1.DG 14 10860) DURP.cABLE 426346 296 0.00 379.50

2451 9/0320 SUPPLIES: BLDG 14 1/132 MENARDS 17790 300 0.00 21.92

2451 970320 SUPPLIES: BLDG 14 1/132 MENARDS 16899 299 0.00 10.80

2451 970320 SUPPLIES: BLDG 14 37132 MENARDE 18898 305 0.00 9.98

2451 970320 SUPPLIES: BLDG 14 37132 MENARDS 18543 281 0.00 35.49

2451 970320 SUPPLIES: BLDG 14 77132 ME/lARDS 17806 282 0,00 42.66

2451 970320 SUPPLIES: BLDG 14 1/732 MENARDS 13696 186 0.00 95.63

2461 970820 ELECTRICITY 03973 C014’IONWEALTH EDISON C 01937-53007 444 0.00 80.25

2451 970820 ELECTRICiTY 03973 COMMONWEALTH EDISON C 53106-66002 450 0.00 1153.53

2401 970820 ELECTRIC3’I’Y 039/3 COMMONWEALTH ED1SON C 49745-07003 448 0.00 238.91

2451 910820 E1,EC’SRICIT’Y 03973 COT’TMONWEAl,Tll EDISON C 49743-8500’) 44’/ 0.00 39.66

2451 970900 EQDIPMEN’f $S,00 07962 ARLINGTON POWER EQUIP 425953 160 0.00 616.97

2453 920120 COMMUNICATION SE 0585! SPRIN’l’ 655130511119 3”3 0 00 132.64

245’) 920225 1,ICET4SING/TI’I’LES 26440 CUMBERLAND SERVICENTE 105820 61 0.00 285.00

2453 930030 R & M VEHICLES 03293 ALEXANDER EQUIPMENT C 69398 50 0 00 1442.03

11314 DATE 06/24/2010 ‘lIME 14:03:59 SUNGARD PEN’I’AMA’l ION iN)’ JUN11 A(’CD)IN’I’IEG

SUNGI3I(I) l’I:N’rAMAT ION NC PURl) ACCOUNT I NO

DATE: (16/24/10

TIME: 14 0302

CITY OF DES PLAtNES

CASh REQUIREMENTS BILL LIST

(‘AGE NIJMI3EI(: 7

ACL’I’PAY I

AC(1)UNT(N(1 11:11(0(1: 6/10

SELECTION (‘(II ‘[‘ER IA: poydhi : duc dl t’ ((1/06/2010’

FUND (00 UIINI/RAL FUND

ORGAN I EAT I UN ACCOUN’I’ 1111(1 — VENDOR PURCHASE UN INVOICE IiI’:CNU SAlES TAX AMOUN’I’

2453 ‘130030 N & N VEHICLES 09336 PIRTEK O’HARE 51493(99 001 3331, 0.00 ‘169.69

2453 9300:30 4 6 M VEHICLES 100678 AUTDKRAFTERS OF DES P 05 213 2(1(0 56 0.00 ‘(12.68

2453 971(030 N & M VE(I1CLIS 200929 GOLF MILL FORD 386212 101 0.00 .1330.6’,

2453 93(10(0 R & M VEHICLES 106202 REYNOLDS AUTOGLASS CO 16176 265 11.00 444.00

2453 910230 R11N1’AI, DI’ UNIFOR 107969 CINTAS I22 22841226 377 ((.00 413.00

2453 970320 SUPPLIES: EQUIP 05875 ATLAS BOBCAT INC. 1396343 55 0.00 48.32

2453 070310 SUPPLIES: EQUIP 07952 ARLINGTON POWER EQUIP 42.3 /06 1,0 0.00 170.611

2453 070310 SUPPLIES: EQUIP 07952 ARLiNGTON POWER EQUIP 424309 61 0.131) 22:3.1(4

2453 970310 SUPPLIES: EQUTI’ 0’/952 ARLINU1’ON POWER EQUIP 421,02/ ‘II 0.00 29.22

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: EQUIP 07952 ARLINGTON (‘OWEN EQUIP ‘12540/ 9 11.00 34 .0(1

2453 9/0310 SUPPLIES: EQUIP 107772 N A P A OF DES PLAINE 340742 302 0.00 4/,06

2453 970310 SUPPLIES: EQUIP 107772 N A P A OF DES PLA1NE 148983 351 0.00 77.531

2453 970310 .SUI’PLIES: IIQIIII’ 542/1 WEST SIDE TRACTOR W96134 219 0.00 93,28

2453 970330 SIJI’PI,IES : vp:I-IICL 04207 POMP’S TIRE SERVICE, 657722 388 0.00 276.90

2453 9703.30 SUPPLiES: VE(IICL 04207 POMP’S TiRE SERVICE, 1,55252 38’) 0.00 294.28

2453 970:330 SUPPLIES: VEH1CL 05612 STANDARD EQUIPMEN7’ CO C56538 109 0.00 60.22

2453 9’/0330 SUPPlIES: VEHICL 06198 WHOLESALE DIRECT, INC 1784135 221) 0.00 4(L /9

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 100986 BATTERY SERVICE CORPO 199208 322 0.00 294.40

2453 970330 SUI’I’LIIIS: VEFIICL 100929 GOLF MILL FORD 264653P 104 0.00 297.42

2493 970330 SUI’I’LIES: VEHICL 100929 GDI,F MiLL FORD 26’ISSGP 100 0.00 297.42

2453 9/0330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 101935 KIMBALL MIDWES’I’ 1534882 316 (1,00 454.45

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 101935 KIMBALl, MIDWEST 1525169 :414, o.oo 229.07

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEIIICL 101935 KIMBALL MIDWEST 7536010 338 0.00 232.70

2453 070330 SUPPLIES: VEI(ICL 105649 LEE AUTO I’ARTS 467346 31:1 0,00 41.26

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 105549 LEE AU’I’O PARTS 469445 313 0.00 27,36

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 105645 LEE AUTO PARTS 469514 324 0.00 12,18

2453 970330 SUPPLiES: VEIIICI, 105649 LEE AUTO PARTS 469581 412 0.00 125.40

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 105649 LEE AUTO PARTS 471409 310 0.00 58.86

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 109649 LEE AUTO PARTS 471983 309 0.00 76.30

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEIIICL 109649 LEE AUTO PARTS 472369 308 0.00 159.32

2493 970330 SUPPLIES: VENICL 105649 LEE AUTO PARTS 470723 304 0.00 63.98

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 105824 ASHLAND INCORPORATED 93451750 360 0.00 1277,50

2463 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 105824 ASHLAND INCORPORATED 93422329 86 0.00 332.20

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 107034 INLAND POWER GROUP 5396421 00 196 0.00 105.34

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 107772 N A P A OF DES PLAINE 346470 361 0.00 86.28

2453 910330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 25335 HDSKINS CHEVROLET INC 398068 99 0.00 26.58

2453 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHTCL 78502 ACME TRUCK BRAKE AND 7201620194 163 0.00 85.69

2453 970330 SUPPLIES, VEHICL 78502 ACME TRUCK BRAKE AND 3201270065 29 0.00 -432.48

2453 970850 GASOLINE 107795 AL WARREN OIL COMPANY 1598358 365 0.00 14127.06

TOTAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE DIV 0.00 23537.64

2454 920)20 CDMMUNICATION SE 05851 SPRINT 695730511100 372 0.00 580,59

2451 930490 REFUSE CONTRACT 13394 ARC DISPOSAL-REPUBLIC 551001874860 161 0.00 305428.42

2454 930490 REFUSE CONTRACT 33394 ARC DISPOSALREPUBLIC 551007913/64 171 0.00 305428.42

2454 930490 REFUSE CONTRACT 13394 ARC DISPOSAL-REPUBLIC 551007911439 53 0.00 106.69

2464 970000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 09638 OFFICE DEPOT 521235181001 346 0.00 65.08

2454 970100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 108231 LOGSDON OFFICE SUPPLY 332189 111 0.00 95.80

2454 970100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 108231 LDGSDON OFFICE SUPPI,Y 3328061 117 0.00 57.86

2454 970100 OFFICE SUPPLIES 108231 LOGSDON OFFICE SUPPLY 332683 116 0,00 18.66


SUNOAI4 1) I’;•:NIAMAr I ON I NC I-IJN1 / 0CC 3 (UN] 3 NI]

DATE: 00/24/10

TIME. 14:03 02

SELECTION (‘N ITCH CA: p:(yii)I C’ (C/if’ (3,17 : ‘07/06/2010’

FUND 1 00 (1 (:NEI100 PUN])

ORGANIZA’rION AC[’OUN’I’ TiTlE -, -

2454 9/0(20 UI]13S1’]( I P’IONS 6 1083302 A P N A

AMOUNT

109 011

0.00 61)84.3.20

0.00 751830.433

CITY OF DES PLA1NES

CASH REQUIr3EMENTs SILL LIST

PAGE NUMNER: 8

ACCTPAY I


TOTAL

TOTAl.

(‘311CC II’ W/)I3 KS AIIM 1 N

“1353)

VENDOR PURCHASE OR INVOICE RECNO SALES TAX

08/1)254 170 0.00

I/UN DATE 06/24/2010 TIME 10:94:01: SUNGARO PLNTN4A’i ION INC - FUNI) ACCOUNTING

SUNGARI) PENFAMAIJON INC FUND J\CCOUNrlNU

DATE: Oh/2”l /10

TIME I 0

C’ I TV DI TIllS II A I NTIS

(‘Ash I1IIQII I RIIMIINID Ill II Sr

I 6111: NIIMII 101 9

ACCTI’AY

155(11 (NIl Nil 011111 (II) £ / 0

SELECTION CRIlERIA: py1lb3e.duec(a[e “07/06/2010

FUND 203 - MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND

ORGAN 1 SAl’ I ON ACCOUNT I ThE ----- VENDOR PURC’IIASTI OIl I NyU I CII RIIONU SAlES ‘lAX AMOUNT

TOTAL M(l’IOR 81)111, TAX 0.00 615,90

TOTAL TITNI) 0.00 635.110

203F 9100110 N & M TRAFI”i C’ 51 06436 MEADII IIIIIl’TR IL COMIAN 645/Il) 1 Ill 0.00 226 .60

203F 930080 Il & N TRAIlIC’ SI 064)5 MEADE ELECTRIC CIMIAN (45954 441 0.00 226.1,1)

203F ‘310060 [1 & N TIIAFIIIC SI 1071:2:1 011 1(61. TRAIIlU 1IICIINI) 19(91 99 (1.00 115.00

2038’ 970920 ELE1’TI( 1CITY 101661 COMMONWIIAIlII IIDIIICIN 07 (90 12061 294 II 00 33. /11

2038’ 970820 ELEC’rRIcI’ry 303 661 COMMONWYIAI’I’II EDISON 0(350 0(11111 29 I 0.00 31 .62

RUN DATE 06/24/2010 TIME 14:04:00 SUNCIAI(D PENI’AMATION 1NC FUND ACCOUNTING

SUNGARI) I’FNTAMAT I UN I NI [‘UN)) AC’I’IIIIN’l’i ND

DATE: 06/24 /TIME: ‘I 0i,l2

SELEC’l’lC)N C’Ill’I’IIIIIA, l)IYIII)I0 dut d,i t ‘01/06/2010’

FUND 204 liii): CnN lIE’) 1310CR I1I1ANT

ORGAN I ZA’ JUN A1’L’l)IINT — — — — Ti ‘II 0

204 F ‘1204110

TOTA I Jill’) Ii 2)311 1 RANT

TOTAl,

CITY OF DES PLAINES

CASH REQUIREMENTS SILL LIST

PAnE NuMBER: 10

ACI’TPAY 1

Ar)’D))N’ri ND i’EIlIIIU: 3, / 1 0

1)1111:) ‘ON

FIINI)

VENDOR - - - PURCHASE OR INVOiCE

0111311 IOY liES JOhN’? 106256 5TANDIZJk 05 25 2010

RFi’Nl’

164

SAlES TAX

0 01)

0.00

0. 00

AMUUN’I’

41101). 110

41100. 1111

‘11)110 - 111)

RUN DATE 06/24/20)0 TIME 14:04:00 SUNUANO FENTA14ATIUN INC FUND ACCOUNTINU

SUNGAR() PIIN1’AMA’I’ION INC FUND ACC’OUN’l’IN))

DATE: 06/24/H)

TIME: 14:01:52

(‘119 OF IllS ‘IA I NIl))

C/Oil 1)11003 RI:MENTII F) I LI I SI’

lACE NUMITIlI) 11

AC’ CTPAY1

AL000N’)’ I NC 151)100 6 / 7 0

SELECTION CI)T’J’ERIA: payable.due d,) c “07/06/2011)

FUND 205’!’ IF. UI DOWNTOWN

TOTAL ‘r. I . F. II 1 DOWN’I’IIWN

PUI1CIIASII Cli INVO1CE RECNO SALES TAX AMOUNT

0.00 5281.39

TOTAL FUND 0.00 5283.39

0RGANIEATTON ACCOUNT ‘TITLE- VENDOR

20SF 9(0 (20 CLEANING: CIJS’I’DDJ 104648 PEIII”Oi’T (‘LEAN INC ))EIIV 3) ‘34), 428 0. 0)) 850.00

20SF 930320 CI.EAN1NCi:CUS’I’I)1JI 104648 I’IlT(FllC’)’ (‘lEANING SF51 31445 426 0.00 566,00

20SF 930.120 CLEANING :C)IS’l’OD) 104645 PIlI(FI1(”I’ CLEANING SERV 3144), 42/ 0.00 566.00

20SF 960185 DOWN’I’OWN I,AND.’)CA 7066)3 I1OSIIOR000II l’AR’I’NIIIlS I 51)35’, 216 0.00 7951 .60

20SF 9’10222 S’I’REIITSCAPI) SUP)’ 306560 LDT100Y lANDSCAPE SUP)’ 0619127 3)17 0,00 300.00

20SF 970221 NIIS’I’OIQA’I’ION SUI’I’ 026)!! !‘IISCIIE’S INC 14146 43’) 0,00 86, 113

20SF 970223 ))TIS’I’OI(A’l’lI)N NUT’!’ 02I 18 PESCIIII’S INC 11 I 4!, 181 0.00 86. ((3

20SF 9(0223 I)ES’l’ORATION S)II’P 02618 !‘ESCIIN’S INC 1434), 385 0.00 264 .88

20SF 9’I0223 RES’!’ORAl’)ON 50!’!’ 106560 I,DT1VEY l,ANDSL’Al’Il SUIT’ 0616994 114 0. 01) 27’I .50

20SF 970223 RESTORATiON SUP)’ 106560 I,URVEV lANDSCAPE SUP!’ (16188 12 11.3 0,00 57.25

20SF 91022) RES’I’ORAl’,ION SUP!’ 106560 SURVEY lJ\NUSCAPE SUI’I’ 061/911 107 0,00 32.10

20SF 970223 RESTORATiON SUPP 106560 LURVEY LANDSCAPE SUPP 0616825 126 0.00 305.90

20SF 970223 RES”I’ORAl’ION SUI’I’ I’ll 32 MENAI1ES 15523 186 0.00 40,56

20SF 9’IOSOO l’URCIIASII UI” MATE 102460 OilY UI” DES l’I,AINES • 71 11070002 330 0.00 17.06

205F 9’/OSOO l’URCIIASE OF WATII 1 02461) C1’I’Y Dl’ DEli I’LAINES 71 3:10 10302 329 0.00 1’/ .06

20SF 970820 rli,llC’rRICITY 03’373 C0MMONWII/u,’rIi EDISON C 53106 58082 442 0.00 39.62

RUN DATE 06/24/2010 TIME 14:04:00 SUNGARD PENTAMAT1ON INC ‘ FUND ACCOUNTING

S))NGARI) PPN’l’AFTA’l’ ION INC FUN)) AC’COLDIT INC

DATE: 00/24 / 0

TIME I! 1) 92

C ITY OF 3115 PLII INNS

CASH REQUIREMENTS HILL LOSE

lADE NUMIU•3/ 12

ACCTI’AY I

ACCOUNT I NIl OliN 101): 1:/! 0

SELECTION (‘I) lEIli IA: p::ylIbIl . )ue daLe-”07/06/20) 0”

FUND 201 EMERGENCy COMMON) CAT IONS

ORGAN I EAT ION AC(’UUNI TI’I’LE VENDOR PURL’) IAN Il (31) 1 NVO I (‘N III:) ‘NO SALES ‘TAX AM(IIIN’)’

TOTAL EMI:IU:I:NCY COMMIIN I CAl’) ONS 0.1)0 ‘19912,49

TOTAL. FUND 0.00 19912.49

206F 920110 PROFESSIONAL SEll 02’/22 STEPHEN A LASH)) ASSOC 21)024)7 Ii) 0. 0)) 020.00

20SF 320120 L’UMMIINIC’A’I’ION SE 05801 SPR1N’l’ 699/305) 1100 4)0 0.0)) 820.46

20SF 9211 I 2)) COMMIJN ICA’I’ION SE 10)343 CALL ONE 06 I, 11) ‘1) II 01) 722) .29

2 06F 9711010 I) 6 N EQUiPMENT 1 0’! 248 CNICAGO DIP I (‘Ii TIIC))NO 309)15/ 61: 0. 0)) 01 (Ii

206F 930010 1) 6 M IIQUIPMEN’I’ 9339.1 CHICAGO COMMUNICAtION 20302 113 (1.00 1723 V :75

20SF 9300)0 0 & N EQUIPMENT 93394 CHICAGO COMMUNICA’I’ION 203191 89 0.00 169 20

20SF 930200 RENTAlS & LEASES 1041.18 VILLAGE OF NILES 286/6 136 0.00 8211.32

206F 9)0320 C1.EAN)NG:CUS’CODI 104648 PERFEOr CLEANING SERV • 3)450 198 0.00 380.1)0

206F 970)1)0 OFFICE SUPPLIES 04302 SAltS CLUB DIRECT 2480 166 0, 01) 38. ‘10

20SF 910)00 OFFICE SUPPLT[IS 09638 OFFICE DEPOT 021354329001 144 0.00 63.28

20SF 971)1)5 SUPPLIES: l)IIPT/O 09636 OFFiCE DEPO’J’ 021174632001 142 0.00 91./8

20SF 970115 SUPPlIES: DEPT/a 09638 OFFiCE DEPOT 52)304329001 141 0.00 229.40

206F 970620 SUBSL’I4)P’)’JONS & 03363 WEST GROUP 8206)3441 222 0.00 59 90

20SF 9/0900 IIQUIPMEN’l’ $S .00 05124 C D N GOVIIRNMENI’ )NCO 55,18/91 88 0. 0)) 1)1.24

20SF 970900 EQUIPMIiN’I’ $S,00 05)24 C 0 W GOVERNMENT INCO SRZI2O)I 61 (1.00 144.99

206F 970900 EQUIPMENT <$5,011 00851 SPRINT 690730011)00 369 0,00 199.99

RUN DATE 06/24/2010 ‘lIME 14:04:00 SUNGAND PON’EAMA’EION INC FIIND ACCOUNTiNG

SUNOARI) PNNrAMAr ION IN)’ FUNI) A))’OUNri NI]

DATE: 06/21/10

rIME: 14 03 52

c1’rY 05 I)I5 I’I,AINI(S

CAR)) ((110111 I1FM)INIi) B IL I I sr

PAGE NUNI3ER: 13

ACCTPAYI

ACCOUNTiNG P61(1101): 6/10

SELECTION CI(i’I’ERIA: pdybO’.dw’ CI,)))’ ‘07/06/201 0”

FUND 208 DPPI) SIIIZEI) ASSETS PIINI)

TOTAL CUSTOM ASSETS

PUI(I.’I lANE OR I NV))) L•II 511USD SALES TAX AMOUNT

0.00

0.00 28717.87

TOTAL FUND 0.00 30752.42

ORGAI4T PIAnOS A(’COIINT 7’ I TIE VIINIX)I)

208 411)1 81) SEIZE)), I’ENIlINL 104 156 ILlINOIS SlAIN )‘OLICII I0)i’810751 1 191 0.00 447 .00

208 41)) 90 SIll XIII), l’ENI)INU 104156 iLLINOIS STAIN POLICE (SF81 01509 190 0.00 020.00

208 410191) SEIZE)), INNOINU 104)5), IlLINOIS SlAiN p05,1(11 )Sl’11107508 182 0.00 900.00

208 ‘1 10190 SIIIPIIID, )‘I•:NDING 1)11)5), ILLINOIS SlATE I’Ol,ICI: 1511101510 200 0.00 1/1 .55

TOTAL OFF)) SF1 XIII) ASSETS 5051) 20.18 . 55

2082 9)0140 UN I I”OIIMN/J)I’I’ARIIL 107 351 UN I FORM OlIN EAST INC’D 97357 227 0.00 1335.00

2082 911)14)0 COMPUTER I)Al)DWA)l 0512’1 C I) W IIUVEI)NMI’INT 1SF)) SSJ246’l 67 0.00 874.337

2082 9110500 VIOIICI,IIS 20024 3 CURl) IF MOTOI1S 060810 295 0.00 26508.00

RUN DATE 06/24/2010 TINE 14:04,00 SUNGARD PENI’AMATI7N INC FUND ACCOUNTING

SUNGARD Il:NJAMNI ION INC FUNI) ACCOUNTI NO (‘NH NUMm71 14

DATE: 06/24/10 CITY UI’ 01111 I’IJ[INIIN

TIME. 1401:1,2 (‘111411 Ill100lI[NMIIN1’i( ((III. 1151 1[(I1ON’FINtI 1511100: 6/10

SELECTION (‘II l’l’IIRIA: payabl e .d,:e date 01/06/201 0”

FOND ‘14 ‘P. 1 . F’. 54 FIVE CORNERS

ORGANI 14111’ ION ACCOUNT — — — TitlE VENDOR P011(1111514 OR INVOICE RI:(’No SAlES lAX ANOUNT

214F 920110 PROFESSIONAl, SEN 49001 KANE NC’ SIINNA & ASSOC 1 ([122 120 0.00 160.00

TOTAl 1’. F. 54 I” 011 CO1INIII1S (1 00 ] 00.00

TOTAl, FOND 0.00 ISO. 00

PUN DATE 06/24/2010 TIME 14:04:01 SUNGARD PENTAMATION :Nc - FUND 1ICCOONTINC

SUNGANO l’i:N)AMA’r ON INC UN)) A) (‘DINT N))

DATE. 06/24/H)

TIME: 4 :01:62

SELIICiLON CR1’IERIA: pydh1I’.dUt: iii “07/05/20)0

FUND — 2 1) OIIANT lUND)?)) PRO,) T?CTS

ORGAN) ZAT I UN ACCOUNT

2330 5201))) PN06RDS )ONAI DEl) 09420 AL1(’DM

TOTAL U)) INN ) RANIS

TOTAL I)JNF)

PAGE NUML1I?R: 15

ACCTPAYI

ACCOUNTINO PERIOD: s/joCITY OF lIES PLAIN)?))

CAN)) Rl(QIJ )REMI?Nl’S 1)) 11 L IS’)

VEND)))) PURCHASE OR INVOICE

9063637

RECNO SALES TAX

10 0.00

0. 00

0 00

AMOUNT

3887. 00

188’? .0))

1887.00

RUN DATE 06/24/2030 TIME 14:04:01 SUNGARD PENTAMAT)ON INC FUND ACCOUNTING

RUNC1AI?U I ‘ENIAMAl’ I ON NI’ I”) ND ACCI lINT I NC

DATED 06/24/11)

TIME, 1’) ,03 52

C’ ‘IV DI’ I));)) PIJ INI•2)

(‘111)11 1101) PIll 11036 III I) I. 5’)’

‘AD Ii NUMI) ER 16

1C(’C’I’I’AV I

At(UUN’l’INU PER lOU 6/20

SELECT ION Cl) TERIA pnyib C’. d1)! dIlL e “UI/Of, /2010”

FUND ‘114 — CAPITAl, PROJECTS I’IINI)

ORGAN I ZATION ACCOUNT TIlLE VENDOR I’UI)CIIASE 0)) (NyC [CE RhINo AMOUNT

TOTAL CAPI’I’AI, I’RDJECTS 0.00 3745.29

TO’rA I FUND 0.00 3745.29

41 4F 920100 lEGAl, FEllS 101)21,1) IR)l)I)l)N S )(AI’J’DJ,l) 1,0,1’ 1421,2 102 0.00 70.00

41 4F 920120 CDMM(IN I CA’VIDN i/I) 05851 SI’)) (NI’ 655’! 30), 1100 491 0 130 300,25

414 F’ 970204 (‘A)’ Thl MA I NTI-;NA 04 (, 23 11)010W ROIl)) C’ONR’h’RUCT I 22 33 0MB 11,4 0.00 1484 .00

4141” 970904 CA)’l’I’Al, MAIN’l’ENA 041-33 ARROW 1)1)111) CONS’PROII”F I :24/2MB 156 0.00 456,33

414F 17091)4 CAP 19111, MAINTENA 041, 3.3 ARROW 111110 CONS’I’RUL”I’I 2:1429MB 157 0,00 342.32

414F 970904 CAPITAl, MAINTRNA 041,3.1 ARROW 1)0111) CONSTRUC’l’l 22502MB 15’, 0.00 446,26

414F 9/0904 (‘Al’)’I’AL MAIN’)’1-NA (016 1.) ARROW 1(0111) CONS’l’RUC’I’I 22391MB 13,3 0.00 547.13

NUN DATE 06/24/2010 TiME 1404Q1 SUNGARD PIIN’IAMAF ON iNC ‘I’N2 AC’(”l’N’I (NO

S UNGPJZIJ I ‘SN’1AMA’( I UN I N( 0511 ?(‘( ‘OUST I NI

DATE (16/24/ic)

T1ME I’1:0L62

SELEClI (IN (‘I) I 1c:RJJ p”y”I’ I 1.’ cIuu di LU 01/06/201 0

FUND 0 MSTI(Jl I 61)5)1]) ‘Al) KIND FUN))

ORGANIZATION AC(’OONI’ ‘])‘r)J( - VENDOR - PURCHASE OR INVOICE

0011 911)112(1 11(075 (‘III 0)97) C0[1MDNWLIAL9’)) EDISON C 52227 30005

TOTAL 5)1)51) ]I:ASFI, 1(1)11

TOTAl 6)15))

CiTY OF ONS PLAINNS

(‘AS) R)IQIJ I I1EMESTS BILL LI SI

PAD): NUMI)NI) 1’?

A(’L’i)’AYI

AC(’O) 5(1 NO I’ll)) IOU: ( / 1 1)

RECND 51)1,1:5 TAX AMOUNT

449 0.00 I)) cl

0.00 I) I . 1)2

(1.01) 111)12

RUN DATE 06/21/2010 TIME 34:04:01 SUNGAI1D PENTAMATION INC FUND ACCOUNTING

SUNGARI) l’EN’I’l!MA’l’ ION I NI’ (-‘ONI) AI’t’OONTI 5:1

DATE: 06/24/10

TIME: 14:03:62

CITY 1))” 11115 ‘1 Al NEil

CAN)) RNQ))l()IIMIN’(’fl ((IL], 1,1ST

PAGE NOMNEI): 18

ACCT0AYI


SELECTION I’)) ITIIR(A: p’y’6l .dn do e 001/06/2010

FUND 502 WATEI1/EIIWIIE P115!)

ORGAN) SAIl ON ACC()UN’I’ 7111,1: VENDOR I’UI)Cl-IJSE OIl I NVO ICE IIECNO SALES TAX AMOUN’I’

TOTAL F I NCAI SERV I eNs/MATE)) 0. 00

‘120) I’S COMMON I CA’!’ ION SIC 05951

TOTAL ICNO I NICI:R I NO/WAlER

655730511100 408 0.00 270.50

0,00 270.50

970700 NI-lW (ONN’l’RUC3’: NA 1)17121) RAIl, (IN I NDER WATER TN REFUND 05 10 133 0.00 .83’,q

TOTAL wATI-:R/NEMER FUN)) 0 00

1812

0655 920120 COMMON IFA’)’IUN NE W8’ I 501/IN’!’ 656)30511100 405 0.00 22.71

0655 920)’,)) METE!) NICADINI .111; (1 (899 FRANK MON IlIAMI 05/24 06/11 201 0.00 ‘/37 .10

0559, 92)11,0 METE!) (lEADING NFl 1040’:) DANIEl, w EIIWINSICI 5/24 5/11/10 .365 0.00 1229,67

0655 920) ‘ill WIlT)-:)) RICAI)INCI NI-. I 041)6 JUKKA )CAI,LI() 5/24 6/11/10 188 0.00 2201 .0’!

0655 ¶120150 MICTI’2l HEAPING SE 11)811 I JOHN STORM 5/24 6/13/10 3(4 0.00 633.26

4723.83

Si I’!)) NI’

5023 520120 COMMUNICA1’[UN SN 0565) SPRINT 6S5’1305]1100 370 0.00 322.20

5023 920120 COMMUNICATION SE 101(43 CALl, ONE 06 15 10 75 0.00 104,56

5023 921(145 JUL. I.E. FEES (19/57 JULIE, INC. 05 10-0435 321 0.00 209.16

5023 92022), LICENSING/TITLES 05249 RONALD HO’11’ICN IOEIMB 06 10 141 0.00 50.00

5023 930010 I) S M EQUIPMENT 0257) PATTEN INDUSTRIES INC PM600381564 254 0.00 1524.00

5023 9300(0 1) & M !CQIJII’MEN’I’ 02 / PATTEN INDUSTRIES INC PM600181771 425 0.00 158.00

5023 960980 MATE!) SAMPLE TICS 28442 SUBURBAN LABORATORIES 1463 363 0,00 483.00

5023 96099)! MISC c’ON’I’RAC’I’IJAL 07686 H B IC WATER METER SEll 30263 204 0.00 35.36

5033 950990 MISC CONTRACTUAl, 0761(6 H B K WAlER METER SEN 10-245 348 0.00 17.58

5023 9701 16 SUPPLIES: DEP’I’/D 59943 SHERWiN WilLIAMS 1.445 1 263 0.00 16.50

9023 970760 TOOlS P.51) !IAIIDWA 05407 HOME DEPOT CNEDIT SEll 1564574 050 0.00 162.46

5023 97016’) SAFElY EQUIPMEN’I’ 04338 PROSAFE’rY 2 664890 252 0.00 71.60

5023 97016’) SAFETY EQUIPMICN’I’ 04338 PR0SAFE’ry 2-664540 345 0.00 64.15

5023 970190 UNIFORMS/APPARICI. 102021 DEERFIN1.D ACTIVEWEAR 2590 331 0.00 52.50

5023 970223 RESTORATION SUPI’ 102486 2 C K CONTRACTORS INC 6392 194 0.00 480.00

5021 970310 SUPPLIES: EQUIP 107/72 N A P A OF DES PLAINE 345737 343 0.00 23.78

5023 910310 SUPPLIES: EQUIP 107772 N A P A OP DES PLAINE 346846 279 0.00 97.05

5023 970310 SUPPLIES: EQUIP 54271 WEST SiDE TRAC’rOR W96320 224 0.00 89.54

5023 970330 SUPPlIES: VEl(ICL 105645 LEE AUTO PARTS 471010 31) 0.00 11,42

5023 970330 SUPPLIES: VEH1CI. 17132 MENAIODS 18197 177 0.00 142.12

5023 970340 SUPPLIES: PUMP!’)’ 03507 ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE 208779 000 298 0.00 224.18

5023 970340 SUPPLIES: PUMP/T 04574 PRAIRIE MATERIAL SALE 94492898 390 0.00 120.00

5023 970340 SUPPLIES: PUMP/T 04574 PRAIRIE MATERIAL SALE 94492897 389 0.00 696.00

5023 970340 SUPPLIES: PUMP/T 08636 ACE DES PLAINES INCOR 218086 52 0.00 31.18

5023 970340 SUPPLIES: PUMP/T 59843 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 1271 1 232 0.00 645.57

5023 970340 SUPPLIES: PUMP/T 59843 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 0814-4 421 0.00 247.93

602.3 970340 SUPPLIES: PUMP/I 59843 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 0031-5 355 0 00 23.52

5023 970340 SUPPLIES: PUMP/T 59843 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 1438-8 356 0.00 228.36

5023 970510 PURCHASE CF METE 108565 SPARLING INSTRUMENTS 517169’ 357 0 00 201.25

j023 970820 ELECTRICITY 03973 COMMONWEALTH EDISON C 96467-61001 292 0.00 26.22

5023 970820 ELECTRICITY 03973 COMMONWEAL’l’H EDISON C 2902009038 288 0.00 237.51

5023 970820 ELECTRiCITY 03913 COMMONWEALTH EDISON C 16021 49012 285 0.00 238.04

5023 970820 ELECTR!CI’rY 03913 COMMONWEALTH EOISON C 67520-54027 455 0.00 2978.95

D2i 970820 ELECTRIC1TY 03973 CO9O4ONWEAI,’rN ED1SON C 35261 -7(0)011 ‘154 0.00 44 ‘13

RUN DATE 06/21/2000 TIME 14:04:01 SONGARO !‘EH’IAMA’J 05 150 F :JNLI AC000N’C INC

SUNGARO FN’l’A11A1’ ON (N)’ ‘ON)) /))‘(‘ODNT I NC

DATE: 09/24/lU

TIME: (4:00,,’

CITY OF DES PLAINES

(‘AS)) SEOUl REMENTS 1)) LI LIST

I”A(Il’ NOW)))))) 1 9

ACC’I’I’AY)

AC(’OUN’)’ I NO ‘F)) 01) 1,/ I)

SELECT ION CR I TEN I A p:ynb I e due do “117/01,/2010”

FUND 1’ 01 - WAlER/SEWER FUND

ORGAN) NATION AC(’01)N7 — — — Ti I’I - VENDO)) - - PURCIIASI) UI) INVOiCE 1)1-2ND 1)01,1)5 TAX AMOUNT

5023 970520 ELEC1RICITY 03973 COMMONWEALTH EDISON C 23821 4101”, ‘102 0.00 64.90

9023 970)12)) ELNC71ICITY 03973 COMMONWEALTH EDISON C 07180 79040 45 0.00 (0.76

5023 970920 )ilE(’TR IC’1’Y 107339 DIRECT ENERGY BUSINI)S 962921: ‘10 (1.00 730’)’) 6

5021 97005(1 OASOLINN 107795 AL WARREN OIL COMPANY 1698368 168 0.00 6081.79

TO1’Ai, WAIF)) SYSTEMS 0.00 24829. .37

5029 920120 COMMUNICATION SE 05891 SPRINT 699/31)5)1 03) 3 ))) 0 00 261) ‘17

5025 920120 COMMUNICATION SE 101343 CALL ONE 06 (5 11) /4 0.00 249.)))

5025 920145 JUL.11). FEES 09757 JULIE, INC. 0% 1)) 1)439 319 0.00 209.16

5025 920410 51)1)51 DY- F1OOII AS 108992 ROIIERT C HERMAN FIll’) 0 3(37 92 0.00 1926 .44

5025 920410 SUIISIIIY:I-’I,OOI) AS 10859:1 CHEN1E I-N0 SOKULSKI I’RI’30 106 ‘1(8 0.00 630 00

5025 9204)0 NIINSIDY:I-1,000 AS 108594 LAVERNE C REILLY i’RPlO 110, 260 (1.00 940.90

5025 9200)0 SUBSIOY:FL000 AS 108595 MARY V SANSONE I’RPIO- 103 ‘119 0.00 2000.00

5025 920410 SUI)SIIJY:FI,000 AS 109596 TOMASZ OKUROWSKI FRP1O 104 13)1 0.00 1909.00

5025 920410 SUIIS1DY:FLOOIJ AS 108598 WILLIAM CHORONSAIC FRPIO 102 152 0.00 2000.00

5025 9204)0 SU)3SIUY: FLOOD AS 108599 JAMES M MOORE FIlEl 0 097 11)) 0. 01) 190:1.00

5025 920415 SEWER LATERAL PR 100559 JEFFREY PALM SLP1O 028 399 9.00 93.90

5025 920415 SEWER LATERAL PR 102083 MARGARET TREVINO SLPIO 030 238 0(30 79.90

5025 920415 SEWER LATERAL PR 702132 LYNNE ANDERSON SIPlO 033 169 0.00 1027.50

5025 920475 SEWER LATERAl. PR 108560 EFRAIN TORRES SIPlO 026 233 0.00 100.00

5025 920419 SEWER LATERAL PR 10859) PI1ILLIP .2 MAlTA SLP1O 02) 109 0.00 1245.00

5025 920415 SEWER JJVFERAI PR 708600 EiLEEN M HENNESSY SLPIQ 032 93 0.00 900.00

5025 920415 SEWER iA’I’ERAL PR 109601 MARY POKRYFKE SLP1O 0(1 272 0.00 7788.01)

9025 920415 SEWER LATERAL PR 13540 hOWARD GRISCHOW SLP7I 029 210 0.00 1654.20

5025 930060 N & M SEWERS & 1. 107752 GASVODA & ASSOCIATES 10 IS0460 328 0.00 2390,00

5(325 930110 R & M SOFTWARE 09988 CUES 327142 333 0.00 1800.00

5025 960990 MISC CONTRACTUAL 11700 CONTINENTAL WEATHER S 10816 64 0.00 150.00

5025 970167 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 04338 PROSAFETY 2 664430 432 0.00 63.90

1025 970330 SUPPlIES: VEHICL 05632 STANDARD EQUIPMENT CO C56677 420 0.00 75.12

5025 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 05612 STANDARD EQUIPMENT CO C56633 358 0.00 120.78

5025 970330 SUPPLIES: VEHICL 107772 N A P A OF DES PLAINS 346400 302 0.00 53.68

5025 970330 SUPPLIES: VENICL 78502 ACME TRUCK BEANS AND 1201480776 2 0.00 832.B8

5025 970330 SUPPLIES: VEH1CL 78502 ACME TRUCK BRAKE AND 3201550794 1 0.00 -61.84

5025 970360 SUPPLIES: SEWER! 03284 VOLLMAR INC 148239 228 0.00 1169.25

5025 970360 SUPPLIES: SEWER! 03284 VOLLMAR INC 144833 229 0.00 885.00

5025 970360 SUPPLIES: SF9/SRI 105845 H (3 SUPPLY WATERWORKS 1417026 327 0.00 606,00

5025 970360 SUPPLIES: SEWER/ 17132 MENARDS 13963 301 0.00 28.63

5025 970360 SUPPLIES: SEWER! 29678 ADDISON BUILDING MATE 648528 162 0.00 58.74

5025 970820 ELECTRICITY 03973 COMMONWEALTH ED1SON C 34611 36053 289 0.00 13) .30

5025 970820 ELECTRICITY 03973 COMMONWEALTH EDISON C 50600 90016 280 0 00 212./1

5025 970820 ELECTRICITY 03973 COMMONWEALTH EDISON C 63370 89024 287 0.00 381.55




5025 970820 ELECTRICITY 03973 COMMONWEALTH EDISON C 06401-44010 284 0.00 132.04

5025 970829 ELECTRICITY 03973 COMMONWEALTH EDISON C 35260-09006 285 0.00 104.56


5025 971820 ELECTRICITY 03973 COMMONWEALTH EDISON C 20381-28006 451 0.00 55 89

5025 970850 GASOLINE 107795 AL WARREN OIL COMPANY 1598358 167 0.00 1009.08

RUN lATE 06/24/2070 TIME 14:04:01 SUNGARD PENTAMAI ION INC FUND ACCOUNTING

SIJNGARU I’ENIAMNI’ I (IN I NI’ ItINIJ ACCHIJN’I NO t’AGE NUMBER: 20

(lATE: III, / II / I I) CI ‘l’Y OF ORE PLAINES ACCTPAY I

TIME 14 : I) : ‘,2 CASH RRQU I REMENTS HI 1,1, LIST ACCOUNTLNG PRRIOII: 6/10

SELECTION (‘N II’RRIA: piiyibIi due lit i’ ‘1)7/06/2030”

FUNO 602 WAlER/SEWER FlINt)

ORGANIZA’I’ION A11’UUN’I T1’rI,E VENDOR PURCHASE OR INVOICE RECNO SALES TAX AMOUNT

TOTAL wATXI1/sxwxIl FIINII 0.00 31260. 711

9030 9110 100 IMI’ROVEMRNTE 1084,1 IITII,ITV sI:Nvjco: COMI’A 241478 231 0.00 31424.60

TOTAl, (‘II’ WATNII/SIIWEFI 0.00 31424.50

TOTAL P1)141) 0.00 92425.19

RUN DATE 06/34/2010 TIME 34: 24:01 SUNGARO PEN’CAISAIION !NC PUNT) ACCOUNTING

SUNGARI) I’RNI’AMA’l’ I UN (NC’ fUND ACCOUNI NC

DAFE: 06/24/lU

TIME: 14:03:62

CITY UI 0101 I’LAINT:S

CASE REQUI REMI1NTS liii I L.l ST

‘ACE NIJMIIII) 21

AC’C’PI’AYI

A(’(’I)IJN’I’INC ill) UI): b/I 0

SElECTION CRITERIA: payable.duedate-”07/06/2010”

FUND 601 (‘(19 OWNED I’AI(ICING FUND

OIlCAN) ZAIILIN ACCOUNT ‘rimE- - - VENDOR I’URC’) AS IC Of) I NVO iLl: IIICCNU SALES ‘lAX AMOUNT

TOTAL CITY OWNED PARKING OPS 0.00 22295.112

TOTAL FUND 0.00 22295.82

5013 9201 2(1 COMI.IUN1CATIUN SE 1 0)143 CALL URIC 116 IS 10 /6 000 030). 25

5013 9 10001) 0 & 14 PARK INC 10 1076 78 COLIEY ELICVAI’OR COMI’A 371,51 1 1 0, 00 1 90. 60

5013 030050 0 & M I’ARKING LI) 107678 COIlEY ELEVATOR CUMPA 9)704 142 11.00 370.00

5013 930050 Il & M PlUCK INC 60 1 3)94 ARC DISPOSAl REPUI9LTC ‘1 1(10701 114 1 54 0.110 78 .10

50)3 9708:10 ElECTRICITY 03973 COMMONWEAITl-I EDISON C’ 22 ISO 11201(1 290 0.00 1221.5)1

5033 9/0820 ICLICCTI(ICTTY 03973 COMMONWEAI.TII EOISON C 41911 27021 291 0.00 30/7. 81

5013 9’/0820 RIECIRICIlY 03971 COMMONWEAI’l’lI EDISON C 5310.1 01000 440 0.00 203.56

5013 9)01)20 ELECTRICITY 039/3 COMMDNWEAL’I’H EDISON C 4722.) 118001 446 0.00 14.87

6013 9701120 I:I.1)C’rRICITY 107335 DIRECT ENERGY RUS(NES 91:4301 39 0.00 32/9.02

5013 980300 IMPROVEMENTS 108)37 RARRECA I1IACK’I’OP SEAl, 9014411 .140 0.00 4550. 01)

RUN GATE 06/24/2010 ‘lIME 14:04:02 SUNGARD PENTASIATION INC FUND ACCOUNTING

S UNGACCC C C’RN’C’AMA’I’ ] UN C NC’ CC NC) Ac’C’UUN’F NO

DATE (10/24/CC)

TIME C’C.CC(:’:U

CITY OF DES PLAINKS

Cl/SIC REQUIREMENTS BILL LIST

PAGE NUMBER 22

ACCTPAYI

!CC(’OICN’lI NO PER C LID o / 1 0

SELECT C 1/N (‘CC CF/ICC (A: y:b H’ du:- dot c’ “01/06/201cC”

FUND 1,04 CI5rI/CCW Fl/NI)

ORGAN C El/I’ C ON AL’COCIN’C’ VENDOR PURCHASE OR INVOICE Rl:c’No SAlES TAX /SMDCCNT

TOTAL ESCROW FURL) 0.00 79135.87

TOTAl, FUND 0.00 19131/81

600 41 CCJ40 CCJ-:C-’CCNDABC,I: BOND/C 09420 DES PLAINES CHRYSLER B ICEFUND6 10 63 0 00 250 00

604 I C 00111 CCICC-’UNDAIIC,IL BONDS 10180 FIRST CONGREGATIONAL B REFUNDS 10 211 0.00 250.00

604 41004CC CCCIC”CCNDAHC,R BONI),9 107885 LUMINA INC REFUND 06 10 Cl 5 0.00 1 (COO. 00

604 4 C ((040 RC’IFUNI)AIIlE CORDS 108201 I’ANATTONI COI45TRUCTIO B REFUNDS 10 191 0.00 1000.00

604 4111040 IICIFIINDACIIIC BONDS 108559 NARIUSZ NIECZOREK B REFUNDS-SO 272 0.00 5000.00

604 4CC)(C40 RIIFUNDAJII,E BONDS 108568 DiVINE SIGNS INC B REFUND6’lO 25 0.00 200.110

604 410040 (CIIFICNDAJCLE BONDS 108569 MAROERITA NUNEZ B REFUNDS 30 127 0.00 200.00

604 430640 REI”CINDAJ/I,LC BONDS 108570 PARTYTIIIE PRODUCTIONS B REFUNDS 70 266 0.00 290.00

604 41004CC REC-’IINI)AICII BONDS 1081/83 RENNER & ROBBER B REFUNDS ICC 257 0.00 200.00

604 410040 CCFI”UNDABIIi BONDS 708584 CHAD NHAM REFUND 06 10 172 0.00 200.00

604 410040 REFUNDABLE BONDS 21717 HERCULES MALAPANES B REFUNDS ICC 199 0.00 5000.00

604 410050 POlICE ESCROW IT 05274 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE MAY 2010 205 0.00 508.00

604 4100S0 (‘011CR ((5(1/OW IT 05274 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE MAY 2010 192 0.00 13/00

604 410(150 POlICE ESCROW IT 05274 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE MAY 2010 12/ 0.00 479.60

604 410071 IIYDRAN’C’ DEI’DSI’C’S 10/120 RAIL GRiNDER WATER TN REFUNI) 05 10 134 0.00 1100.00

604 410)56 SPECIAl EVENTS: 100268 THOMPSON RENTAL STATI 447842 235 0.00 179.82

604 410159 )CI’T’X’IAI, EVENt’S: 109480 W 0 B V F M 110064556.3 211 (1.00 1020.0CC

£04 410155 SPEC Il/I, EVENTS: 106450 PADDOCK PUBI,1CATTONS 48247201 267 0.00 500.00

604 ‘1101(5 sI’I(CIM, EVENTS: 107/91 JACKS TENTS & PRDDUC 2010 A 395 0.00 1621.55

RUN DATE 06/24/2010 ‘FINE 14:04.02 SUNGARD PENTANAT CON INC FUND ACCOUNTiNG

SUNOARD I’RN’I’Ar’IA’PION INC FuND ACCOUNi’] NC ‘ACE NIJMIIP.Il 23

DATE 06/2’] /10 Cl’l’V [(I” lIES l’lA1NE]i A(’(”l’PAYO

TIME, ]‘[ 03,52 (‘ASH I]EQ[JIRI1MEN’]’I] 111,3, lj5T 1O’C’OIJN’FINO I’lIlIUI], 6/It)

SELECTION CRITERIA: payable, due daue ‘01/06/20 0”

PUNt) 101 N [SE MANAGEMENT ION])

OPGANIZA’I’ION ACCOUN’l’ TITLE VENDOR - PURCHASE ON INVOICE NE(’NU SALES TAX AMOUR)’

70] F 920016 SUI1S1’ANQE AIUSI1 1(3(122 ALEX IAN )INo’)’lll:RS COoP 1668)1’] 1) 0.00 75.00

100 F 920332 CLAIMS ADMIN FEE 001118 PAllOR lIDS IN’UEONATEI) 2560’) 312 0.00 550.00

TOTAl, Il (SI’] MANAGEMENI’ 0.00 625 00

TOTAL l”UNI) 0.00 625.00

RUN DATE 06/2’]/2010 TIME 14,0’0:02 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC FCND ACCOUNTiNG

SUNGARI) ENTAMA’]’ I UN I NC FUND AcCOUNt’ INC

DAlE 01, /: / 10

TIME 141(1:62

SELECtION I’ll I TEN Ill: plyobie due ddl e 01/06/2010

FUND 1(1 1 1 T IIEI’LACEMENT PUNt)

ORGAN I EAT ((IN ACCOUNT 9i’l’LE - VENDOR

703F 910420 CUMI’UTI(Il 501-THAN 06)24 C 0 W GOVERNMENT TNCD

TOTAL T (((II ACEMI-:N’l’

TOTAL tONI)

TOTAL RXI’UR’I

CITY OF DES PLAINES

CASH REQUIREMENTS WIlL LIST

FACE NUMBER 24

ACCTPAY I

ACCOUNT I NC 01(11 101) 6 / I I)

PURCHASE OR INVOICE RI(CNO SAIl(S)’AX AMOUNI’

SWZ1967 66 0.00 41(0.16

0.00 4(30. II

(100 4110.16

0.00 96)220.12

RUN DATE 06/24/2010 TIME 14:04:02 SIJNGARD PENTAMATION INC FUNI) ACCOUNTING

SUNOARI) PENTAMATION INC — 11/NI) ACCOUNTI NC

DATE: 06/24/lU

TIME: 12 31 .39

OIlY 01 DES 012) INNS

Cl IICOK 115:1; I SINk 0 S JUlIO EMIINI’ lUNDPage 25

Manual Checks — Various Funds & Accounts

CASH ACI:T I’IIICC’K NC) I sous: IY VENDOR (SCION 1 RAl’ I UN UNSCI) I STION- SAlES TAX AMOUNT

1020Db lO]418 1)6/1 I/I)) lOll/I))) A ‘I’ & ‘I’ 1214 1111 2)1 ‘10 01, 2/ 10 0.00 62.62

002005 40149’I 1)1/11/10 10)401) lINDA ‘01/MON 60’) NAIl, TICICIIT 02 15 10 0.00 118.40

1020011 401423 011/17/10 10111)113 A ‘1’ 6 1’ 06117 06 04 TO 07-03 11) 0.00 4842.211

1020011 401433 06/17/10 101888 /(1’ 11 T 2011) 06 07 TO 0/ 06-10 0.00 383.95

102005 401433 06/17/10 101888 A T 11 1’ 2061” 05 07 TO 06-06 10 0.00 33.92

TOTAL CHECK 0.00 5260.23

102005 401434 06/17/10 101692 A T & ‘I’ MOBTl,.l’l’Y 0692 tNV839230861X06112090 0.00 19.60

102005 409435 06/1 //10 111.1970 (‘DMCJIS’l’ CABLE (1632 ACCT 8771100’/101151141 0.00 99.28

1020011 4014)6 06/18/10 101)158 (IlICAUD POLICE DEI’AR’l’Ml(N 1213 TR817.6414690E444543.l0 0.00 36.110

102005 403622 06/21/10 108468 (‘liICJ’,flO l’Ol.ICE DEPAF/TMNN 1213 Tl4h1R641469A544146048 0.00 36.50

TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 5633.33

TOTAL FUND 0.00 5633.13

TOTAL REPORT 0.00 5633.13


SUNOARI) (I/N’I’AMA’I’ I UN I NI; I”UNLI AC(’OLINTI NC

DATE: o/.’’7IC

TiME 4,19: 14

CI’I’Y OF DES PlAiNER

ChECK RI/C) I 1/lEN Dl SHURSEMXN’r ION])Page 26

?uto Debits — Various Funds & Accounts

CASH AC’I”r c’iIIX’K NC) 1/111(1K DI’ VENDOR ORGANIZATION IS/NCR) “lION SAIl/S TAX AMOUNT

10200CC AD) 0007(1 06/29/10 0312(1 CITY OF C)ITCACD 5023 ACC1’ 4 (Oh/b)) (1.00 104220 00

102009 AD) 000/b 0(1/29/10 03325 CiTY OF CHICAGO 6021 ACCT 4 /0)1/0 0.00 99750.00

102008 A0100076 ((6/29/10 03325 CITY OF CHICAGO (102.) ACII’ 410969 0 00 100125 .00

102008 AO10007C, 06/29/10 03325 CITY OF CHICAGO 5023 ACCI’ 4308(17 0,00 103500(10

TOTAL ChIlE0.00 407(195. ((0

102008 1/010007/ 06/20/10 107204 BANE OF AMERICA 2082 URIC 1/TOP 16 0.00 6)30

102008 AD) 000 ‘1? 06/20/10 107204 BANK (IF AJ.IERICA 20)12 1)141/ STOP 16 0.00 125.00

102008 10)100077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERiCA 2082 ONE STOP 1 0.00 43.1,0

102008 AI)1 00077 06/20/10 207204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 ONE STOP 16 0.00 236.72

102008 1/0100077 06/207)0 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 ONI/STOI’ I 0.00 13(1.55

102008 AOl 00077 06/20/10 207204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 MARATHON OIL 0.00 23 .7)

102008 AOl 0007’? 06/20/10 107204 BANE OF AMERICA 2(152 MARATHON OIl 0.00 26.27

102008 10)100077 06/20/10 107204 RANK OF AMERICA 2082 MAI/A’i’HON OIL 0.00 35.72

102008 AD1 0007’? 06/20/10 107204 I3ANI( OF AMICR1CA 2 CII) I3I/A1ON 1’AI’ LLU 0. (10 87.31

102008 AOl 0007’! 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 1214 TI)R13O Fl//Rb: USA 0.01) 633,29

102008 10)1000/7 06/20/10 107204 BANE OF AMERICA 2./IC) CUZZ1NS 0.00 63.47

102008 AD100077 06/20/ID 107204 BANE OF AMERiCA 0634 IMLII 0.00 550,00

102008 AD) 000’?’? 06/20/10 10)204 SANE OF AMERICA 0631 STAI’If/S O(RECI’ 0.00 108,20

202008 ADI00077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERiCA 0620 SIAPLES 1)11(1/CT 0.00 44.99

102008 10)100077 06/20/30 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 1223 S//MN CLVII 4926 0.00 49.89

102008 AD10007’? 06/20/10 I0’/204 RANK OF AMEIhICA 1811 BUY.COM (1,01) 34,98

102008 ADI0007’? 06/20/10 107204 SANK OF AMERICA 4141’ GUSHING & COMPANY 0.00 2(18/75

102008 10)700077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 0635 STAPLES DIRECT 0,00 111,53

102008 101100077 06/20/10 707204 BANK OF AMERICA 20SF FECIIHEIMER RROTIII/RS 0.00 42.99

102008 AD100077 06/20/10 307204 NAME OF AMERICA 206F CAL1 ONE 1NC 0.00 17.85

102008 AO100077 06/20/10 107204 BANE OF AMERICA 20SF VCG UNIFORM 01 0.00 89.99

102008 1033000’17 06/20/10 107204 BANE OF AMERICA 20SF CALl, ONE INC 0.00 918,71

102008 AOl 0007’? 06/20/10 107204 BANE OF AMERICA 206F BEST BUY 0.00 579.99

102008 AD1000’17 06/20/ID 307204 BANE OF AMERICA 0635 MARKERTEK VIDEO SUPPLY 0.00 1/9,32

102008 AD100077 06/20/10 107204 BANE OF AMERICA 2082 ONE STOP 10 0,00 42.60

102008 A0100077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 SHELL OIL 0.00 31.16

102008 AD100077 06/20/30 307204 BANK OF AMERICA 206F FECFIH6:II4ER BROI’HERS 0.00 106.99

102008 A13100077 06/20/10 107204 BANE OF AMERICA 20SF FECHNE1MER BROTHERS 0.00 100,57

102008 AD100077 06/20/30 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 20SF FECHNEIMER BROThERS 0.00 77,98

102008 AD200077 06/20/10 107204 BANE OF AMERICA 20SF FECHHETMER IIROI’)IERS 0.00 184,35

102008 P0310007’? 06/20/1.0 307204 BANK OF AMERICA 604 ART ELECTRONICS 0.00 298.05

102008 10)100077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 EXXON MOBIL 0.00 21.34

102008 AO100077 06/20/10 107204 RANK OF AMERICA 0639 KMAI/T 4214 0.00 37.81

102008 AD100077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 0639 OOMINOS PIZZA 0.00 158.50

102111)8 AO10007’? 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 0639 CHANNINC RETE COMI’ 0.00 20.95

102008 P3110007’! 06/20/10 007204 BANK OF AMERICA 0639 CHiCAGO FARE MEDiA (IFS 0 00 100.00

102008 AO1000’/7 06/20/10 10/204 BANE OF AMERICA 0639 WALCRI/SNS 6866 0.00 100,00

102005 ADI00077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 0639 P2W (M000NAI,IIS) 0,00 12(1,00

30201)5 AOI000’/7 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 0639 JEWEL OSCO 0.00 300 00

102008 ADI00077 06/20/10 107204 BANE OF AMERICA 0620 CHICACO PAl/RISC METERS 0.00 2.2(1

102108 A0100077 06/20/10 107204 BANE OF AMERICA 1830 OFF1CEWORLI).COM 0.00 62.16

102008 AD100077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 0632 VOICE RATION 0.00 9 95

RUN DATE 06/24/10 TIME 34:18:34 SUNCARO PENTANAT1ON INC - FUND ACCOUNTING

SUNGAI)D ‘ENIAMAF] UN

DAT’E os/:’i/lo

TIME II Ill 3’)

I NC tiN)) A(COUNI’i NO

LIlY OF DES Ph/lINES

CHECK RED I BIER - DI SIIURSEMENT FUNDPage 27

Auto DebiLs -— Various Funds & Accounts

CASH ACCI LlIII(l< NO ISSUE lii’ VENDOI) --- ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION- - SALES TAX AMOIJNI

TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 418729.29

TOTAL FUND

TOTAL NEPONT

0.00 418729.29

0.00 418729.29

1020013 161)10001/ 06/20/30 107204 I3ANK OP AMERICA 0632 METEORLOGIX 0_Do 432.00

102008 1603000’)) 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERiCA ‘/03F PENFOLDGIOP 0.00 1105,00

102008 AOl 00017 06/20/10 007204 B/INK OF AMERICA 2082 GOGGLE 0.00 169.99

1020031 160100077 06/20/10 101204 BANK OF AMERICA 0820 DAYDOTS 0.00 45.08

002008 AOl 0001) 06/20/10 007204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 SHELL OIL 0_Do 24.85

1020013 AD) 00077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 SHELL OIL 0.00 86.03

102008 A0100077 06/20/30 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 GASLANO AND PESOTUM 0_Do 82.73

102008 AOl 00077 1)6/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 CIRCLE K 0.00 22.89

102008 A0100077 06/20/10 10/204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 CIRCLE K 0.00 51.73

102008 160100077 06/20/10 107204 HANK OF AMERICA 2082 CIRCLE K 0.00 54.39

102008 160100077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 CIRCLE K 0.00 88.97

102008 160100077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 ONE STOP 1 0.00 44.53

102008 1613100011 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 ONE STOP 1 0.00 51.42

102008 161)100077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF A/’lERIA 2082 ONE STOP 1 0.00 50.79

102008 161)10007/ 06/20/00 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 SHELL OIL 0.00 30.35

102008 1611100077 06/20/00 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 MARATHAN OIL 0.00 70.66

102008 AD100077 06/20/10 10/204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 MARATHAN OIL 0.00 22.87

102008 AD100077 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 MARATHAN OIL 0.00 32.68

102008 ADI0007/ 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 ONE STOP 16 0.00 48.80

102008 161)100071 06/20/10 107204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 ONE STOP 16 0.00 21.33

102008 16010001/ 06/20/10 107204 HANK OF AMERICA 2082 ONE STOP 16 0_Do 56.28

102008 16010007’) 06/20/Il) 101204 BANK OF AMERICA 2082 SHELL OIL 0.00 31.01

102008 /601000)1 06/20/30 101204 BANK OF AMERiCA 2082 SHELL OIL 0.00 32.53

102008 161)10007/ 05/20/lu 10/204 HANK OF AMERICA 2082 SHELL OIL 0.00 58.83

TOTAL CHECK 0.00 11134.29

RUN DATE 06/24/10 lIME 14,18:35 SIJNGARD PENTAMAT1ON INC - FUND ACCOUNTING

for Warrant Register July 6, 2010 Page 28

Amount Transfer Date

Automated Accounts Payable $953,220.92

Manual Checks $5,633.13

Payroll Activity: —

Payroll $1,270,229.94 — 06-17-2010

RHS Payments - Electronic Transfer $0.00 —

Electronic Transfer Activity: —

Bank of America Credit Card $11,134.29 ‘ 06-20-2010

Chicago Water Bill ACH $407,595.00 *, 06-29-2010

Postage Meter Direct Debits $591 1 .74 * 06-23-2010

IMRF Payments $0.00

MICA Payment $0.00 —

Property Taxes $0.00 —

Short Term Loan Payoff $0.00 —

Debt Service Payments $0.00 —

Employee Medical/Dental Trust $18,255.02* 06-23-2010

* MuItpIe transfers processed on or before date shown

See attached report

Total Cash Disbursements: $2,671,980.04

ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF DES PLAINES

THIS SIXTH DAY OF JULY 2010

AYES

_____

NAYS

_____

ABSENT

Gloria J. Ludwig - City Clerk

Martin J. Moylan - Mayor

Conunittee of the Whole Agenda Item #2a

City of Des PlainesCity Attorney’s Office

1420 Miner Street, Room 401DES PLAINES Des Plaines, IL 60016

ILLINOISTel: 847-391-5303Fax: 847-391-5003

STAFF REPORT

Date: June 24,2010

To: Jason Slowinski, ting City Manager

Cc: Michael Conlan Dir ctor of Community & Economic Development

From: David R. Wiltse City Attorney

Subj: Conditional Use Permit for the expansion of parking at a Place of Worship, 480 PotterRoad, Case # 10-01 8-CU

Issue: The petitioner, the Islamic Community Center at 480 Potter Road, Des Plaines, IL 60016,is requesting a modification to a Conditional Use Permit under Section 7.2-4-C of the 1998 DesPlaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to authorize the expansion of parking areas at an existingPlace of Worship in the R- 1 District.

Analysis: The Islamic Community Center (ICC) has requested to modify an existing ConditionalUse Pennit to increase onsite parking. The ICC obtained a Conditional Use Permit (#98-26) inJuly of 1999 to construct a new building for a Place of Worship by authorization of the CityCouncil through ordinance Z-12-99. The conditions in the ordinance required additionallandscaping along the fence at the west end of the property, restricted lighting in the outdoorrecreation area, and prior approval of the Council for building permits for exterior work.

Over the years, the number of worshippers has continued to grow and the ICC has responded byincreasing the number of their services to accommodate the crowds. Parking has become anincreasing problem with overflow parking occurring in the neighborhood. Since one of theservices is on Friday afternoon and U.S. Postal customers in the neighborhood have streetmailbox delivery, the area has become congested and mail delivery is occasionally disrupted.

The ICC has acquired additional adjacent property to use for additional on site parking. Sincethe parcel is landlocked and to improve traffic flow, the ICC changed a plan of exiting into theneighborhood in favor of a new exit on to Potter Road. The new exit removes approximatelyfive spaces from the old lot to create the exit. Accordingly, the net gain with the lot expansion isapproximately 23 spaces. Potter Road is identified as a collector street in the ComprehensivePlan.

Application of the Law to the Facts: Both the State and Federal governments have adoptedlegislation limiting and controlling the actions municipalities may take regarding “Houses of

I

Page 2 of 2

Worship”. These two laws are entitled the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Actof 2000 and the Illinois Religious Freedom Restoration Act. These laws are similar and severelyrestrict the operation of units of government, including local home rule units of government fromplacing “burdens” on the exercise of religion which includes the use of property owned or leasedby religious groups. The following is a portion of the federal statute:

Sec. 2. Protection of land use as religious exercise.(a) substantial burdens(1) general rule- No government shall impose or implement a land use regulationin a manner that imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of aperson, including a religious assembly or institution, unless the governmentdemonstrates that imposition of the burden on that person, assembly, orinstitution;(A) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and(B) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmentalinterest.

The Illinois Religious Freedom Restoration Act uses similar language to make similarrestrictions.

In this case, the ICC has changed its plans per the City’s request. The 1CC will not seek to exittraffic into the neighborhood on to Good Avenue and instead exit onto Potter Road. Finally, theywill provide onsite parking for an additional 23 vehicles. Although this will not solve all of theparking problems in the area, the provision of onsite parking is favored by the City andrepresents a step by the ICC to address the parking concerns of the neighbors. This traffic andparking compromise is viewed by Staff as the least restrictive means of addressing the parkingconcerns of the neighborhood. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the compromiseplan as the least restrictive means of addressing the parking concerns consistent with thereligious use of the property by the ICC.

Recommendation: The Community Development Department recommends approval of theConditional Use Permit modification request for the expansion of parking at a Place of Worship,subject to the conditions of approval:

1. The Petitioner shall revise the parking lot plan to allow fbr turnaround at the westernterminus of the parking lot extension to the satisfaction of the Director of PublicWorks and Engineering. Either stripe one of the existing spaces for no parking, orreconfigure the western terminus to include some pavement to allow a 3-point turnaround

2. The Petitioner shall continue the use of two traffic management personnel to managethe pre-service pedestrian crossings of Potter Road. and the post-service flow ofvehicles out of the lot.

The City Attorney also recommends the approval of the Conditional Use as it addresses theparking problem while complying with the provisions of State and Federal law.

DW/ms

City of Des PlainesCommunity & Economic Development Department

Division of Planning & ZoningDES PLAINES 1420 Miner Street

ILLINOIS Des Plaines, IL 60016Tel: 847-391-5306

Fax: 847-827-2196

MEMORANDUM

Date: June 24, 2010

To: Jason Slowinski, Acting City Manager

From: Michael Conlan, Director of Community & Economic Development

Subj: Conditional Use for Parking Lot Expansion - Islamic Community Center

Issue: The Islamic Community Center, located at 480 Potter Road, has plans to expand its parkinglot on an interior parcel within its boundaries. According to the Zoning Ordinance, the expansion ofa Place of Worship in the RI Residential district, including the expansion of parking facilities,requires an amendment to the existing Conditional Use.

Analysis: Places of worship are considered “residential use” in a zoning context, and theirplacement within an R-l district is a permitted conditional use. For purposes of land use regulation,an expansion of a church refers to the property owned by the place of worship, and not simply to thebuilding itself. This is an important consideration when dealing with church parking lots. The CityCouncil historically has strongly encouraged the expansion of church parking lots to minimize on-street parking congestion and, since the majority of churches are located in R-l districts, suchparking lots abut residences as a matter of course. When these parking lots are expanded, eventhough the end result may be a lessening of street congestion, the immediate neighbors often viewthe expansion as an intrusion upon the residential character of their street.

Since its inception, the Islamic Community Center sought ways to mitigate the traffic and parkingissues associated with its weekly services, including the hiring of off-duty police orncers to directtraffic. The ultimate solution, however, is the provision of more off-street parking capacity toaccommodate the influx of worshippers, and that means an expansion of the church’s fiotprint. Forseveral years, the church has worked to purchase some of the adjacent residential lots in order toprovide more onsi te parking.

For the last year and a half, the Alderman of the ward and City staff have worked with neighbors in

order to resolve concerns regarding an expansion of the Islamic Center’s parking area. The mostcontentious element proved to he a plan for access in and out of newly constructed parking from thesurrounding residential streets, either Good Avenue or Ironwood [)rive. The current plan eliminatesthis concern, as the access to this lot will he limited to Potter Road. A consensus was reachedduring neighborhood meetings that the elimination of residential street access. particularly Good

Avenue, provided a workable solution. While residents have additional issues regarding fencing,lighting and the placement of a basketball hoop, these will be addressed through the building permitprocess, as City code has protective standards for surrounding properties.

Conclusion: The parking lot expansion plan proposed by the Islamic Center depicts a responsibledevelopment pattern, and it represents a consensus plan acceptable to neighbors by providing reliefto on-street parking congestion while eliminating access from residential streets.

w



AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USEPERMIT UNDER SECTION 7.2-4 C. OF THE ZONINGORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE EXPANSION OFPARKING AT AN EXISTING PLACE OF WORSHIP AT 480POTTER ROAD, DES PLA1NES, ILLINOIS. (CASE #10-018-CU).

WHEREAS, application was made by Ghulam M. Farooqie for the Islamic CommunityCenter to the City of Des Plaines Department of Community Development for authorization bythe City Council of a Conditional Use Permit to permit the expansion of parking at an existinghouse of worship under Section 7.2-4 C. of the Zoning Ordinance, in a R-I, Single-FamilyDistrict, at 480 Potter Road in Des Plaines, Illinois; and

WHEREAS, the existing zoning is R-1, Single-Family Residential; and

WHEREAS, within fifteen (15) days of the receipt thereof, said application was referredby the Department of Community Development to the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City ofDes Plaines; and

WHEREAS, within ninety (90) days from the date of said application a public hearingwas held by the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 25, 2010 pursuant to publication in the DesPlaines Journal on May 7, 2010 and notice was mailed to all property owners within 300 feet ofthe subject property of the consideration of the Conditional Use so proposed by the Petitioner;and

WHEREAS, said hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held May 25, 201 0pursuant to notice published as required by law, wherein competent testimony and evidence wasgiven with respect to how said Petitioner intended to meet the provisions of the ZoningOrdinance. Said Zoning Board of Appeals filed a written report to the City Council on June 2,2010 of such testimony and evidence and their recommendations, by a vote of 4-2, denying theexpansion of parking at an existing house of worship under Section 7.2-4 C. of the ZoningOrdinance, in a R-l, Single-Family District, at 480 Potter Road, Des Plaines. Illinois; and

WhEREAS, said Petitioner made certain commitments to the Zoning Board of Appealswith respect to the requested Conditional Use Permit, which representations are hereby tbund bythe City Council to be material and upon which the City Council relies in granting this requestfor a Conditional Use Permit subject to certain terms and conditions; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the respective written reports of the ZoningI3oard of Appeals, together with the applicable standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, theStaff Report dated June 2, 201 0. including the Conditional Use Application completed by thePetitioner, together with the exhibits to the Staff Report, which include a I ocation Map. Site andContext Photos, Plan of Operation, the drall Zoning Board minutes of May 25, 2010 and the

I

Letter from the Zoning Board of Appeals to the Mayor, which form part of the basis for thisordinance;

WHEREAS, a review of the Zoning Board of Appeals draft minutes of May 25, 2010reveals that some Commissioners felt that the creation of 23 onsite parking spaces did not“solve” the parking problem in the neighborhood. Upon considering all the facts, the CityCouncil finds that expansion of the Conditional Use Permit, by the creation of 23 onsite parkingspaces, relieves the offsite parking problem by that number of vehicles arid is therefore adesirable result. Further, the City Council finds that the reconfiguration of the exit plan, whichallows traffic to exit on to Potter Road rather than on Good Avenue, also demonstrates thePetitioner’s willingness to seek alternatives to reduce traffic in the neighborhood behind theMosque. These factors are adopted as the rationale of the City Council in approving thisConditional Use;




made a part hereof, the same constituting the factual basis for this Ordinance. The Conditional


Public Act 94-1027.


applicable standards set fbrth in the Zoning Ordinance, the representation to the Zoning Board of

Appeals made by the Petitioner, the Plat of Survey prepared by R.W. Stanley and Associates,

dated December 27, 2001, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit

“A,” and the Parking and Utility Plans prepared by Peter F. Olesen and Associates, dated

September 24, 2009, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit “B,”

the C’ity Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to permit the expansion ol parking at an

existing house of worship under Section 7.2—4 C. of the Zoning Ordinance, in a R— I, Single-

Family District, at 480 Potter Road in Des Plaines, Illinois,

3.4-8: A. No conditional use permit shall be valid for a period longer than one year unless abuilding permit is issued and construction is actually begun within that period and isthereafter diligently pursued to completion. However, the City Council may extend theone-year period to a mutually agreed upon time.


C. Except when otherwise provided for, this Ordinance, a conditional use shall bedeemed to relate to, and be for the benefit of, the use and lot in question, rather than theowner or operator of such use or lot.

3.4-9: The approval of a conditional use permit application by the City Council shall notauthorize the development, construction, reconstruction, alteration or moving of any

building or structure, but shall merely authorize the preparation, filing and processing ofapplications for such permits or approvals as may be required by the regulations of theCity, including but not limited to a Zoning Certificate and a building permit.

SECTION 4: The Zoning Board of Appeals recommendations, findings and conditions

found in the June 2, 2010 memorandum from Arnie Seegers, Chairman of the Zoning Board of

Appeals, are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 5: That the property at 480 Potter Road, which is the subject of this


PARCEL 1: A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNINGAT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBEDPROPERTY THE NORTH 90 FEET OF THE SOUTH 270 FEET (EXCEPTTHE WEST 33 FEET THEREOF FALLING [N GOOD AVENUE) OF THEWEST HALF (1/2) OF THE EAST FIALF (1/2) OF LOT 5 IN FREDERICKMEINSHAUSEN DIVISION OF LANDS IN SECTIONS 15 AND 16,TOWNSHIP 41 NORTFI, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPALMERIDIAN IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING,THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOtJTFI LINE ‘I’[IEREOF 142 FEET,THENCE NORTHERLY 30 FEET, THENCE WESTERLY 15 FEET, THENCENORTHERLY 60 FEET TO TFIE NORTH LINE OF THE ABOVEDESCRIBED PROPERTY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINETHEREOF 157 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OFTHE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY 90 FEET TO THE POINT OFBEGINNING IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

PIN: 09-15-301-034

3

SECTION 6: That granting of the Conditional Use Permit for the address of 480 Potter

Road within the subject property is granted upon the conditions set forth below. Upon failure of

the Petitioner to act upon this authorization within twelve (12) months of’ the date of this

Ordinance, the granting of the Conditional Use Permit for the subject property shall he



time by resolution duly adopted at any meeting of the City Council, extend said period of time.

In addition to the foregoing, the Petitioner must meet the following conditions:

1. The Petitioner shall revise the parking lot plan to allow for turnaround at the westernterminus of the parking lot extension to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Worksand Engineering. Petitioner shall either stripe one of the existing spaces for no parking,or reconfigure the western terminus to include some pavement to allow a 3-point turnaround.

2. The Petitioner shall continue the use of two traffic management personnel to manage thepre-service pedestrian crossings of Potter Road, and the post-service flow of vehicles outof the lot.


neglects or refuses to comply with or resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of’ this

Ordinance shall he fined not less than Seventy-five Dollars ($75.00) or more than Seven



addition, the appropriate authorities of the City may take such other action as they deem proper

to enforce the terms and conditions of’ this Ordinance, including, without limitation, an action in

equity to compel compliance with its terms. That any person, firm or corporation violating the

terms of this Ordinance shall he subject, in addition to the toregoing penalties, to the payment of


SECTION 8: That within 6() days of the passage of said Ordinance, the executed,

original Ordinance shall he returned to the (‘ity Clerk’s othce.

4




SECTION 10: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its


PASSED this __day of , 2010.

APPROVED this

_____

day of_____ , 2010.


MAYORATTEST:

CITY CLERK

Published in pamphlet form this Approved as to form:day of , 2010.

_____________

£

____


- —

being the owner or other party in interest ofthe property legally described within this Ordinance, having read a copy of the Ordinance, dohereby accept, concur and agree to develop and use the subject property in accordance with theterms of this Ordinance.

I)ated:

(Signature)

Legal’Ord’Specüil Cli (ii 4i() Polki (hui cli Pirking Expaiision

5

City ofDes FlamesCommunity & Economic Dei’elopment Department

Division ofPlanning & ZoningDES PLANES 1420 Miner Street

LLINOfS Des Plaines, IL 60016Tel: 847-391-5306Fax: 847-391-2196

STAFF REPORT

Date: June 2, 2010

To: Jason Slowinski, Acting City ManagerMichael Conlan, Director of Community & Economic Development / —

From: Scott Mangum, Senior Planner, Community & Economic Development Department 17Subj: Conditional Use Permit for the expansion of parking at a Place of Worship, 480

Potter Road, Case # 10-018-CU


Issue: The petitioner is requesting a modification to a Conditional Use Permit under Section 7.2-4-C of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to authorize the expansion ofparking areas at an existing Place of Worship in the R-1 District.

Analysis:Proposed Use Place of Worship ([slarnic Community Center)

Petitioner Ghulam M. Farooqie, 480 Potter Road, Des Plaines, IL 60016

Owner Islamic Community Center, 480 Potter Road, Des Plaines. IL60016

Plan of Operation Friday Afternoons from 12:00pm to 3:00pm and during the holymonth of Ramadan for 3 hours during night prayers until 11:00pmat the latest (dates and times vary).

Existing Use Place of Worship

Surrounding Land Use North: Single-Family ResidentialEast: Multi-Family Residential and CommercialSouth: Single-Family Residential

of5West: Single-Family Residential

Existing Zoning R-l, Single-Family Residential

Surrounding Zoning North: R-1, Single-Family ResidentialEast: Unincorporated Cook CountySouth: R- 1, Single-Family ResidentialWest: R-l, Single-Family Residential

Street Classification Potter Road is identified as a collector street in the ComprehensivePlan.

Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan recommends an Institutional Use for theexisting site and Traditional Single-Family Residential for thesurrounding parcels.

The Islamic Community Center (ICC) has requested to modify an existing Conditional UsePerniit to increase onsite parking. The ICC obtained a Conditional Use Peimit (#98-26) in July of1999 to construct a new building. The ICC is believed to have established at 480 Potter Roadprior to the late 1980’s.

The ICC has acquired a 13,646 square-foot, 90-foot wide parcel, to the west of, and contiguousto the existing parking field. This parcel is landlocked, as it does not have street access. Theproposed expansion would add approximately 28 parking spaces to the existing parking field ofapproximately 110 spaces. A secondary exit is proposed on Potter Road to provide more efficientegress from the site. The new exit would remove approximately 5 parking spaces, resulting in anet increase of approximately 23 spaces over current conditions. The ICC has purchasedadditional adjacent land (see attached Location Map) and would like to further increase parkingcapacity in the future, however, that is not a part of the current request.

The Engineering Division observed traffic and parking conditions during the peak period onFriday April 3, 2009 from 12:40pm to 2:05pm. The parking lot filled approximately 30 minutesprior to the start of the service, after which vehicles parked on adjacent streets, both east andwest of Potter Road. Based on pedestrian counts it was estimated that the total number ofvehicles arriving for prayer was around 270. Based on this observation the Engineering I)ivisionconcluded that additional off-street parking would he beneficial for accommodating the Fridayprayer peak. The Engineering Division has also reviewed the proposed parking lot expansionplan and conditions of approval incorporate comments regarding the continued use of parkingmanagement personnel and the creation of a vehicular turnaround at the western terminus of theparking lot.

Conditional Use Findings: As required by Section 3.4-5 (Standards ftr Conditional Uses) of theZoning Ordinance, the proposed development is reviewed below:

of 5A. The proposed conditional use is in fact a conditional use established within the specificZoning district involved:

Qnlnient: Places of Worship are a conditional use in R-1, Single-Family Residential ZoningDistrict, as specified in Section 7.3-6-C of the 1998 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, asamended.


Comment: The Place of Worship use generally complies with the 2007 Comprehensive Plan,which recommends Institutional and Traditional Single Family Residential for this site. A Placeof Worship is a Conditional Use in the R-l Zoning District.

C. The proposed conditional use is designed, constructed, operated and maintained to beharnionious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of thegeneral vicinity:

comment: The Islamic Community Center is located within an existing structure. No additionsare proposed to the existing structure.

D. The proposed conditional use is not hazardous or disturbing to existing neighboringuses;

Comment: None of the functions of the [slamic Community Center are anticipated to behazardous or disturbing to the surrounding neighborhood.


Comment: After reviewing the petitioner’s plans, the proposed conditional use would be servedadequately by essential public facilities and it would not overburden existing public services.


Comment: The proposed conditional use would appear to have adequate public lacililies; itwould not create a burden on public facilities nor would it he a detriment to the economic wellbeing of the community.

G rrhe proposed conditional use does not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,

of5equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, orthe general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke fumes, glareor odors;

Comment: The proposed parking lot expansion is not anticipated to create a significant amountof additional traffic. It is anticipated that the paricing lot expansion will reduce the amount ofvehicular and pedestrian traffic on surrounding residential streets.

H. The proposed conditional use provides vehicular access to the property designed so thatit does not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares:

Comment: The proposed project would create a second curb cut on Potter Road for one-wayexiting. Potter Road is currently being reconstructed to handle additional automobile volumes.

1. The proposed conditional use does not result in the destruction, loss, or damage ofnatural, scenic, or historic features of major importance;

C’ominent: The proposed parking lot expansion would be located adjacent to the site of theexisting mosque. ‘The proposed plan would add impervious surface, but would not cause thedestruction, loss, or damage of any natural, scenic or historic features of major importance.

J. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional regulations in the ZoningOrdinance specific to the conditional use requested:

Gomment: As proposed, the parking lot expansion appears to conft)rm to all other zoningregulations.

Recommendations: The Community Development Department recommends approval of theconditional use permit modification request for the expansion of parking at a Place of Worship,based on review of the information presented by the applicant and the findings made above, asspecified in Section 3.4-5 (Standards for Conditional Uses) of the City of Des Plaines ZoningOrdinance, subject to the following conditions of approval:

1. The applicant shall revise the parking lot plan to allow for turnaround at the westernterminus of the parking lot extension to the satisfaction of the [)irector of PublicWorks and Engineering. Either stripe one of the existing spaces for no parking, orreconfigure the western terminus to include some pavement to allow a 3-point turnaround.

2. The applicant shall continue the use of two traffic management personnel to managethe pre-service pedestrian crossings of Potter Road, and the post-service flow ofvehicles out of the lot.

At its May 25, 2010 meeting, the Zoning Board of Appeals re’(o,nmended (4-2) that the CityCouncil deny, the above-mentioned conditional use permit fbr the expansion of parking at a

of 5Place of Worship in the C-3 zoning district. Under Section 3.4-4-C of the Zoning Ordinance(Conditional Uses) the City Council has the authority to approve, approve subject to conditions,or deny the above-mentioned conditional use permit.

Staff requests that this item be placed on the Committee of the Whole agenda at the June 21,2010 City Council meeting.

SM/sm

Attachments:

Attachment 1: Petitioner’s Conditional Use



Attachment 4: Plan of Operation



Exhibits:

Ordinance authorizing a modification to a Conditional Use Permit to allow the expansion ofparking at a Place of Worship at 480 Potter Road.

W/ Exhibit A: Plat of Survey for 480 Potter Road prepared by R.W. Stanley andAssociates, and dated December 27, 2001

WI Exhibit B: Parking and Utility Plans, prepared by Peter F. Olesen and Associates,and dated September 24, 2009.

/ \

DO NOT WRITE IN THIS AREA — FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

CASE NUMBER:

_____

l)ATEFJLEI)

Address ofConddional Use: HDPoLit

____

, Des Plaines, IL.

Fee Paid/Receipt Number: Amount: 35 [)ate: I 0

PDF’s are being: jJ Submitted on a C])-ROM OR h-mailed to the Project ManagerC-Protect Manager: - J) -

Legal Not ice Publication Date: --- , published in the: Journal Topics

Scheduled hearing dale: 3 ° at 7:30 P.M. in Room 102, City 1-Jail

Action by Zoning Administrator/Zoning Board of Appeals/City Council: ——

A Conditional Use is requested in accordance with the City of Des Plaines Zoning OrdinanceSection(s)

—-

— as amended, to allow the:

on the property described by the attached legal description.

Applicant(s) Name:

Telephone: 47dio7c Fax:, - 4 )- Z4.f/)4 /Mailing Address:

—

40- -

-- IL I

lLAilAJ

Property Owner(c) Name,’

llephone:47°‘-107c Fax: 4? 2.4 - )b4

Mailing Address: 4P

A’tc,,hment_________

I

Contact Person: ( jftjt-,A—,u M E,4soo QfLE

lelephone: 47R30 liax 47f24U4f E-Mail:-

MailingAddrcss: ‘48() t27fk’

Address of Property: 0P/V Des Plaines, IL. 60016

Property Index Number: o’f c o1 - c4o üoo

(From tax bill or township assessor’s office)

App!icanFs interest in the property: sohc owner fl lessee [ contract purchaser

El Other (explain):

Present Zoning Classification of Properly:

Current Use of Property: — t’1 JE -

Proposed Use of Property: fr2A—r<?KflJBulk and Scale Evaluation (Please 1ll out completely):

TRUST INFORMATION

Name(s) of Trust Beneficiary (ies)*

Address (es) of Trust Beneficiary (ies)*

* All applications involving property held by a land trust must be signed by the trust officer of theinstitution holding the trust as the owner of the property. Additionally, the trust beneficiary andhis/her current address must be disclosed on this ftMm. The application must also beaccompanied by the following:

• A certified copy of the trust igreemerit.

• A letter from the trustee certifying that the beneficiary as shown on thisapplication is colTect and disclosing any beneficiary changes or lack thereofduring the 12 months preceding the filing of this application.


‘I’hc Zoning Board of Appeals and the (‘ity Council review the particular facts and circumstancesof each pmposed ( ondiiional [iso in terms of the Following standai-ds. Because of this, pleaseanswer all questions in (letail. “Yes” and ‘‘No” answers will not be accepted, and if used, maydelay your Ii eai•i ii g.

A. Is the proposed condit onal use, in fact, a conditional use established within thespccilic zoning Lhstrict involved? (Please explain in detail)

B. Is the proposed conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the City’sComprehensive Plan and this Oi-dinance? (please explain in detail)

Yc

C. Is the proposed conditional use designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so asto be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intendedcharacter of the general vicinity? (Please explain in detail)

PgoJ) PMiIJ6 1,01

57J1JE-ro wii’i-1 liiG

PAui tvt.

D. is Ihe proposed conditional use is not hazardous or disturbing to existing neighboringuses? (Please explain in detail)

C

E. Is the proposed conditional use to be served adequately by essential puhhc facilities andservices such as highways, streets, police and tire protection, drainage structures, refusedisposal, waste and sewer, and schools; or (he persons or agencies responsible fiw theestablishment of the proposed conditional use shall pmvidc adequately any suchservices? (Please explain in detail)

F. Does the proposed conditional use does create excessive additional requirements atpublic expense ftr public facilities and services and not be detrimental to the economicwelfare of the community? (Please explain in detail)

i\j0

G. Does the proposed conditional use involve uses, activities, processes, materials,equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to aiiy persons, property,or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of frame, noise, smoke, fumes.glare or odors? (Please explain in detail)

H. Does the proposed conditional use provide vehicular access to the property designed thatdoes not create ai interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares? (Pleaseexplain in detnil)

1. T)oes the proposed conditional use result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural,scenic, or historic feature of major importance? (Please explain in detail)

/\j 0

i. Does the proposed con(lilional use comply with aH additional regulations in thisOrdinance specitle. to the conditional use requested? (Please explain in detail)

I hereby certify that. all oCthe above statement.s and those contained in any papers or planssubmitted herewith are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Furthermore, I consent to theentry in or upon thc premises described in the application, by any authorized official of the Cityof Des Plaincs, for the purpose of posting; maintaining, and removing public hearing notices asmay be required, and, as well as, conducting site analysis.

C.

4- -1O

(Signature of Applicnt or Authorized Agent) (Date)

-

/ (Sigiiature of Owner) (Date)

Attachment 2, Location Map - 480 Potter Road

Existing Community Center and

Proposed Parking Expansion

!‘{ 0

‘.

I

Additional Islamic Community Center Owned Land

Prepared by Community and Economic Dev&opment Department: SM, May 18, 2010—7

r. -

‘ ‘,

In the Name o[Allah, ihe Most Beneficent, Ihe Most Merci/li!

Islamic Community Center of Des Plaines480 POTTER ROAD. DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS 60016 • TEL (847)824-1100 FAX. (847)824-1041

Date: April 21, 2010

ToMr. Mike ConlanI)irector Community DevelopmentCity of Des Plaines, IL 60018

Subject: Plan of operation on proposed parking lot-485 Good Avenue I)es Plaines III.

Dear Sir,

The parking area will he used on Fridays during the hours of 12:00 pm and 3:00 pm andduring the holy month of Ramadan for 3 hours during the late night prayers. (;. M,)( )G. M. Farooqie

President,Islamic Community (‘enter of I)es [‘lames480 Potter RoadDes Plaines, IL. 60016

Attachment

fl..

VLRJLY YHE WAY OF LIFE iN THE SIGHT OF ALLAH 18 ISLAM Q(JRAN 3:19

DES PLAINES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSMAY25,2010

M1NUTES

The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Des Plaines held its regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, May 25,

2010, at 7:30 P. M. in City Council Chambers, Room 102, of the Des Plaines Civic Center.

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

PRESENT: Catalano, Hotherr, Porada, Saletnik, Szabo, Seegers

ABSENT: None

Also present was Senior Planner, Scott Mangum.

The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P. M.

A motion was made by Porada, seconded by Catalano, to approve the minutes of the October 27, 2009;

November 24, 2009; January 12, 2010; and March 30. 2010 hearings.

AYES: Porada, Catalano, Szabo, Saletnik, Seegers

NAYES: None

MOTION CARRIED

A motion was made by Porada, seconded by Saletnik, to approve the minutes of the May 11,2010 hearing.

AYES: Porada, Saletnik. flolherr, Saletnik, Szaho, (‘atalano, Seegers

NAYES: None

MOTION CARRIEI)

*****

Chairman Seegers announced that Case 410—021 —V, 2800 River Road, had been Continued to the June 2Q, 21)10,

hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals.

Chairman Seegers indicated Mr. ITofherr had read the minutcs of the March 30, 2010, hearing relative to the next

Case, which had been Continued.

Attachment b

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (couLd)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Flenry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 2

Case #1 0-003-CU — 1141 Lee Street

Request: A Conditional Use Permit under Section 7.3-6-C of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance,as amended, to authorize an auto body repair operation in the C-3 District.

Mr. Ammar Shaikh, 1141 Lee Street, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Chairman Seegers asked Mr. Shaikh to explain his request.

Mr. Shaikh stated a landscape plan, with the parking allotted for all the existing businesses had been submitted. Mr.Shaikh stated an additional 50-60 spaces had been provided. Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether adequateparking exists. Mr. Shaikh stated it does.

Chairman Seegers inquired about the additional information requested by the Board. Mr. Shaikh stated informationabout the galvanized steel paint booth with filters had been provided. Mr. Shaikh added the exhaust is emittedthrough the air.

Referring to the minutes of the May 11, 2010, hearing, Mr. HoihelT inquired as to current conditions in the rear ofthe property - whether it had been cleaned prior to the establishment of the proposed business. Mr. Shaikh stated thecleanup was in progress. Mr. Hofherr inquired as to whether the abandoned vehicles and parts had been removed.Mr. Shailch stated the removal was complete. Mr. Hofherr noted, as of yesterday, the cars and parts remained [onthe site]. Mr. Mangum noted that, since the last meeting, Building and Code Staff had sent a letter to the ownernoting the applicable violations as well as the environmental hazards that exist.

Mr. l-lotherr asked that Mr. Shaik.h also clean up the trees and brush along the railroad tracks into the property sothat it is more presentable to the people entering the site as well as those who live behind the site and those who ridethe train.

Mr. Porada inquired as to when the property had been inspected. Mr. Mangum stated prior to the issuance of theaforementioned May 6, 2010, letier. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether that letter would become part of the recordof these proceedings. Mr. Mangum stated the letter is part of the Code enforcement file.

Referencing the aerial photo dated March 23, 2010, Mr. Porada inquired as to the deficiencies itemized in the letter.Mr. Mangum stated the cleanliness of the property as well as antifreeze and other liquids that are considered to heenvironmental hazards. Mr. Mangum added that parking also existed on non-compliant surfaces. Mr. Poradaconfirnied the liquids on the site were not found in bottles or containers, but in pools of liquid on the site. Mr.Mangum confirmed that was correct. Mr. Porada inquired as to the protocol that is followed after issuance of theletter. Mr. Mangum stated the owner was given until June 5, 2010. to bring the property into compliance and thatthe Administrative Hearing process is initiated if it is not complete by that date.

Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the site plan included in the Board’s March 30, 2010, materials was still valid.Mr. Shaikh stated a new site plan had been submitted, Mr. Porada inquired as to the Plat of Survey dated May 24.1996. Mr. Shaikh stated a new Pint of Survey had also been submitted. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether t was thelarge document. Mr Mangum stated the May 24, 1996. survey had been used by the contractol hired by thepetitioner as a basis to draw the dimensions of he parking spaces on site as well as the parking required fhr all thetenant uses as had been required in the Conditions of Approval. Mr Porada inquired as to whether Mr. Mangumwas referring to the ledger sized sheet. Mr. Manguni stated the revised landscape plan dated May 21, 201(1. Mr.Porada indicated he did not see a date. Chairman Seegers noted the (late was Ihund above the number on the rightside. Mr. Xhaikh stated he would obtain a ne survey ii ne was needed

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Henry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 3

Referencing four photographs, Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the photos were new. Mr. Shaikh confirmed theywere. Mr. Porada recalled that, during the March 30, 2010, hearing, the interior layout had been requested.Chairman Seegers stated, at that time, the fire separation was the main concern.

Mr. Porada expressed concern over the placement of the spray booth and whether the spray booth would be locatedon the wall shared with the restaurant. Mr. Shaikh stated it would not. Mr. Szabo inquired as to whether aseparation wall exists between the petitioners space and the restaurant. Mr. Mangum stated Building and FireDepartment personnel confirmed a masonry wall exists, but without fire rated openings, which are required. Mr.Szabo confirmed the doors were not fire rated. Mr. Manguin confirmed that was correct. Chairman Seegersinquired as to where the doors lead. Mr. Mangum stated the doors lead to the restaurant. Referencing the photo inthe lower left corner, Mr. Porada confirmed that photo illustrated the masonry wall being discussed. Mr. Shaikhstated it is a big, thick wall. Mr. Porada confirmed that was the wall adjacent to the restaurant. Mr. Mangumconfirmed it was the west wall.

The owner of the property, Dhitu Bhagwakar, 1141 Lee Street, Des Plaines, Illinois was sworn in to give testimonyin this case. Mr. Bhagwakar confirmed the masonry wall separates Mr. Shaikh’s space from the restaurant. Mr.Porada inquired as to what happens when Mr. Shaikh’s business is established. Mr. Bhagwakar stated the restaurantis already fire rated and the doors would not be visible. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the doors would remain.Mr. Bhagwakar stated they would. Mr. Porada confirmed whether the doors are fire rated. Mr. Bhagwakar statedthey are. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the garage door would remain. Mr. Bhagwakar stated it would. Mr.Porada inquired as to whether the windows would remain. Mr. Bhagwakar stated he may replace the existingwindows with glass block. Mr. Porada inquired as to how many overhead doors currently exist on the east wall.Mr. Bhagwakar stated one garage door and one entry door. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether any garage doorswould be added. Mr. Shaikh stated none would.

Mr. Porada inquired as to the framed wall. Mr. Bhagwakar stated the framed wall is shared with the restaurant. Mr.Porada inquired as to what is behind the brick and plywood. Mr. Bhagwakar stated the brick and plywood would beenclosed by drywall. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the roof truss was also wood. Mr. Bhagwakar stated it is.

Chairman Seegers called for additional questions of the petitioners by members of the Board.

Mr. Saletnik confirmed that the paint booth discharge and construction of the fire walls would be part of theBuilding and Code review at time of construction. Mr. Mangum confirmed that was correct.

Chairman Seegers called for the Staff Report to be read by Mr. Mangum.

Staff Report:

Chairman Seegers called for questions or comments by members of the audience, either in favor of or in objectionto the proposal.

Former Alderman Patricia Beauvais, 547 Webford, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.Ms. Beauvais stated, unfortunately, City Ordinance does not include any provision to suspend or revoke a

Conditional Use once granted. Ms. Beauvais noted that many auto businesses do not heed the Conditions set fbrthand the only recourse the City has is to issue Building Department violations. Ms. Beauvais noted that the lack ofupkeep by the auto sales and repair facilities pose a problem within the City.

Ms. Beauvais stated she was present to request the Board augment the existing Ordinances. Ms. Beauvais notedthere is no incentive for businesses to comply with the terms of Conditional Use if the City cannot uphold them.Chairman Seegers noted the ZBA does not write the Ordinances and cannot control the enforcement, but can onlymake stipulations as part of its recommendations. Chairman Seegers stated Ordinances can only be changed by CityCouncil.

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU- 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU - 480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Flenry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 4

Stating his agreement with Chairman Seegers comments, Mr. Porada inquired as to whether Ms. Beauvais wasaware of other municipalities in which ihe provisions requested were available. Ms. Beauvais stated she was not.Ms. Beauvais stated her awareness that the Building Department is inundated with phone calls from residents filingcomplaints. Ms. Beauvais noted more and more Conditional Uses are being approved. Ms. Beauvais acknowledgedthe ZBA is not the only Board in need of being addressed, but that she felt she must start somewhere. Ms. Beauvaisreiterated the magnitude of the problem and stated she was not sure of the answer. Referencing the period Ms.Beauvais served as Alderman, Mr. Porada noted she was in a better position [than the ZBA] to address the issue.Mr. Porada noted the Illinois Constitution allows Conditional Use to run with the land rather than any business andthat considerable latitude between enforcing and revoking exists. Ms. Beauvais stated, as Alderman, she was aproponent of giving petitioners the benefit of the doubt but has witnessed it spiral out of control in recent years andwishes she would have addressed the matter more firmly. Ms. Beauvais stated she has more opportunity to observesites such as the one at issue now that she has more time.

Ms. Beauvais stated it was her hope that if she addressed the ZBA and the City Council, there would be somesuggestions with regard to obtaining future compliance.

Chairman Seegers stated Ms. Beauvais’ points were well taken and thanked her for her comments.

Mr. HoTherr stated citizens have recourse. Mr. Hofherr suggested that if a person is aware of a property that is indisrepair, blighted or in any way objectionable, that they should register a complaint with the Code EnforcementDepartment. Mr. Hotherr stated an officer physically inspects the property when a complaint is filed and that theowner, and sometimes tenants, are notified of his findings and given a specific number of days to comply. Mr.Hotherr stated if compliance is not made within the specified time period, Administrative Hearing action is initiatedand, if the owner is found guilty, a fine levied. Mr. HofheiT stated that could be avoided if the owner is informed theprocess is more costly than correcting the problem(s). Mr. Hofherr encouraged residents to file complaints ifwarranted. Mr. Porada added that, in his experience, the Code Enforcement Division has always been responsive.Mr. Porada encouraged residents to attend the Administrative Hearings. Mr. Mangum noted that Article IV of theCity’s Zoning Ordinance, Enforcement of Penalties, include a process for revocation. Mr. Porada inquired whowould initiate such a process. Mr. Mangum stated anyone who lodges a complaint for investigation.

Chairman Seegers stated the ZBA has the option to include recommendations with its approval(s) and can do sowhen appropriate. Chairman Seegers added the City Council can then choose to enfhrcc, add or deduct from theBoard’s recommendation.

A motion was made by Saletnik, seconded by Szabo, to recommend authorization of an auto body repairoperation in the C-3 District, subject to the Conditions set forth in the Staff Report.

Mr. Szabo inquired as to the timetable for resurthcing the lot. Mr. Mangum stated the Board could require theresurfacing be completed prior to the issuance of the Permit. Mr. Saleinik stated he did not wish to pose any undueburden to the petitioner by specif’ing a date, hut perhaps that all Conditions should be met before an OccupancyPermit is issued.

Mr. Floflierr asked that the removal of all abandoned vehicles and auto parts in the rear and east side, along therailroad tracks, as well as the removal o[dead trees and general cleanliness, he included. Mr. [Ioiherr stated it wasnecessary to retain the screen, hut that it needed to he cleaned up. Mr. Bhagwakar stated he will remove the deadtrees and clear the branches, hut stated his tenant has a right to keep vehicles on the property. Mr. l3hagwakar addedthat the tenant, not he, should be responsible to clean up that urea Mr. Hoiherr stated, as the owner, Mr.Bbagawakar not only receives the citations, hut is responsible for the upkeep of the property. Mr. Bhiagwakar statedhe has made the request, hut that the tenant has not been responsive and perhaps would he home responsive to Citypersonnel.

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU -1855 E. Oakion StreetCase #10-018-CU - 480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Henry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 5

Mr. Saletnik amended his motion to also include the provisions for cleanup as stated in Staff’s letter of May 6,

2010. Mr. Szabo seconded the amended motion.

AYES: Saletnik, Szabo, Catalano, Hofther, Scegers

NAYES: Porada

MOTION CARRIED


Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton

Request: A Conditional Use Permit under Section 7.3-6-C and a major Variation to Section 7.3-3 ofthe 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to authorize the operation of a motorvehicles sales operation on a lot of less than 25,000 square feet in (lie C-3 1)istrict.

Attorney Barry Collins, 733 Lee Street, Des Plaines, Illinois; applicant Mr. Shankar (Sam) Patel and the owner ofthe property, Rainesh Punitar, were sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Mr. Collins stated Bully Auto Care has been repairing automobiles at the present location for 10 years. Mr. Collinsstated the current owner of the business wishes to branch out into auto sales. Mr. Collins stated the addition of autosales would not impact traffic. Mr. Collins added one ingress/egress on Oakton Street would be closed but theexisting ingress/egress on Locust would remain. M. Collins stated the parking would be expanded to accommodate24 vehicles with one handicapped reserved space. Mr. Collins stated a landscape plan had been submitted.Mr. Collins noted additional sod would be added to the east. Mr. Collins stated a fence that separates his client’sproperty from the residential area south currently exists and added the alley provides a natural barrier. Mr. Collinsstated his client expects to have eight vehicles for sale at any given time. Mr. Collins stated normally there are twoemployees on site at a time — Mr. Pate! and his brother. Mr. Collins stated the addition of auto sales would add oneperson, Mr. Punitar, who has an extensive sales background.

Mr. Collins stated he and his clients were present to assist in answering any questions the Board may have.

Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether the building would be improved. Mr. Collins stated no changes to thebuilding were planned — that changes only to parking and the landscape area are proposed. Mr. Collins slated hebelieves the Board had been provided photos of the current conditions [on the sitej. Mr. Collins stated his clientshave agreed to the 7-foot setback and addition of vegetation, as recommended by Staff.

Mr. Collins inquired as to whether a copy of the traffic study had also been provided to the Board. Mr. Mangumconfirmed it had. Mr. Collins noted the traffic study, conducted by KLOA, concluded the proposed auto saleswould have no measurable impact to traffic on either of the two streets that abut the property.

Chairman Seegers confirmed landscaping was proposed along Locust and Oakton. Mr. Collins confirmed that wascorrect, Chairman Seegers confirmed the area adjacent to the east side of the building would be improved with sodand that no vehicles would be parked in that area. Mr. Collins confirmed that was correct. Mr. C’ol tins corrected hisearlier testimony to state that lighting may be the only improvement made to the building. Mr. Collins stated hisclient agreed to hire the necessary lighting engineers to determine the amount of light that would be sufficient forsecurity. Mr. Collins added that if any lighting were added, that it would be directed toward Oakton and not theresidential area and would conform to Staff’s recommendations. Mr. (‘ohms stated hours of business operation asMonday through Friday until 7pm.

Mr. Hofherr inquired as to whether yesterday was indicative of a typical business day. Mr. Punitar stated yesterdaywas an exceptional day as a result of providing parking to the neighboring restaurant who had a large crowd. MrC ‘ohms stated, because his client has no need tbr the additional space, some patrons of the restaurant park 5 to 7 cars(>11 his client’s lot, Mr. Collins stated the restaurant uses more spaces in the eveni ig hut added that would ceasewhen auto sales commence.

Mr. Porada confirmed the iniixiinurn number ui employees to he four. Mr. Collins slated that was correct. Mr.Porada inquired as to whether all drive. Mr. Collins stated the third person is Mr. Patch’s brother who lives twoblocks from Mr. Pate! and that they ear poe1 when both are working.

Mr. Puracla inquired as to how ninny vehicles are repaired on a typical clay. Mr. Collins stated four, bitt added that ifa customer does not pickup his/her x’ehicle promptly [lint it could be on the lot fbr an additional day or so Mr.


Porada inquired as to how many vehicles were planned for sale. Mr. Collins stated that the matter had beenapproached with a total number of vehicles on the lot without any designation as to the quantity for sale and thequantity for repair because the mix could constantly he changing. Mr. Porada inquired as to the number shown onthe site plan. Mr. Collins stated the site plan had been drawn to illustrate the total number available and withoutparking on Locust. Mr. Collins added that a finite amount of parking exists. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether thepetitioner was amenable to a maximum number of vehicles for sale. Mr. Collins stated his client would not beamenable to a number for sale, per Se, but amenable to a maximum total number on premises of 24. Mr. Collinsstated he did not feel there is any purpose served by limiting the number of repair or sales vehicles and that doing sowould prevent his client from adapting to the demand. Mr. Porada confirmed the petitioner already operates an autoservice repair facility. Mr. Collins confirmed that was correct. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether that had beengranted previously by the Board. Mr. Mangum stated the auto repair is permitted by right in the Zoning District.Mr. Porada concluded that the petitioner could have an auto service facility for up to 24 cars by matter of right. Mr.Collins stated, conceivably, if the lot were expanded to accommodate 24 vehicles. Mr. Porada noted that there wasno recourse over the auto repair operation but that because sales were not a matter of right, that sales was the onlyaspect of the business to which a Condition would be attached. Mr. Porada encouraged his colleagues to considerlimiting the number of autos fbr sale.

Mr. Porada inquired as to whether there was currently any on-street parking. Mr. Collins stated there was not. Mr.Porada confirmed that there was a commercial building located to the west and residential to the south. Mr. Collinsconfirmed that was correct and reiterated the residential properties to the south were separated by the alley. Mr.Porada inquired as to whether a landscape buffer was proposed along the alley. Mr. Collins stated nothing wasplanned beyond the fence. Mr. Porada confirmed the solid fence immediately to the south is 6-feet in height. Mr.Collins confirmed that was correct. Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether the fence was set back from theproperty line. Mr. Collins stated it appears to be set back approximately 4-feet.

Mr. Catalano inquired as to whether the security lights would be illuminated all night. Mr. Collins stated heexpected that would be the case. Mr. Catalano inquired as to the placement of the building lights. Mr. Collins statedhe was uncertain as to whether building lights would be added, but amended his original statement with regard tochanges to the building in the event that would be the case. Mr. Catalano inquired as to the pole light shown on thewest side of the property and another on an island at the entrance. Mr. Collins stated he was unaware of pole lightsbut added the person who drew the plan was likely aware of the proper placement of the lights.

Mr. Porada inquired as to the rationale of assigning parking in that fashion during evening hours. Mr. Collins statedhe would check with his client. Mr. Porada inquired as to the existing lighting. Mr. Collins stated there is currentlya flood light on top of the building on Oakton. Mr. Catalano confirmed the light is on all night. Mr. Punitarconfirmed it is. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the light is attached to the roof of the building. Mr. Punitarconfirmed it is. Mr. Porada concluded the lighting is used to detour vandalism. Mr. Porada expressed he did not seeany reason why repaired and new vehicles could not be moved to the spaces along Oakton in the evenings toeliminate any intrusion on the neighbors to the south. Mr. Porada added doing so would also eliminate the need forlighting directed to the south. Mr. Collins stated that would assume all the spaces along Oakton were vacant. Mr.Collins added Building Code requires parking lots he illuminated and that even office buildings are lit at night. Mr.Mangum stated light is not permitted to trespass onto the single-family residential properties across the alley. Mr.Collins stated his client would comply with that Ordinance requirement. Mr. Saletnik noted it is not the ZBA’spurview to detennine the lighting detail or how a business should he operated. Mr. Saletnik added the petitioner hasa right to illuminate his property for security purposes and that purpose of the performance standards is to providesuch protections. Mr. Mangum stated his agreement. Mr. Porada stated his opinion that attaching reasonable(onditions is the proper course. Mr. Collins reiterated his client is willing to comply with Code. Chairman Seegersstated the Board’s interest in working out issues in the best interest of all parties.

Citing the petitioner, as vell as some of the members of the audience, as familiar, Mr. Saletnik inquired as towhether this matter had been befiire the ZBA previously. Mr. Mangum conlirnied the petitioner appeared hefbre theZBA in 2004 and that the request had been subsequently rejected by the City Council.



Staff Report:

Chairman Seegers called fbr questions or comments by members of the audience, either in favor of or in obfrction tothe proposal.

Ms. Linda Caruth, 1868 Bennett, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Ms. Caruth stated she had documents, a petition and photographs to present. Ms. Caruth stated the documentsincluded copies of the Ordinances and a history of how many times Bully Auto had appeared before the ZBA for thesame reason and each outcome. Chairman Seegers asked how many times Bully Auto had appeared. Ms. Caruthstated Bully Auto has appeared before and/or requested Continuances from the ZBA and/or City Council 18 times.Chairman Seegers inquired as to the significance of item(s) highlighted. Ms. Caruth stated the highlighted item(s)are the City Ordinances and violations cited over the years and not addressed by the Department of Community andEconomic Development.

Chairman Seegers confirmed the third document was a copy of the petition. Ms. Caruth stated the petition includesthe names and signatures of 160 persons opposed to allowing Bully Auto to become a used car lot. ChairmanSeegers noted the date on the petition is June 25th Ms. Caruth stated that was an error- that the date should be May25th• Chairman Seegers stated the ZBA is considering only the current case, not proposals since 1997. Ms. Caruthstated her understanding. Ms. Caruth reiterated all other proposals, with the exception of one in which approval wasrecommended by a company called Land Strategies who had developed that particular Staff Report, had been deniedby both the ZBA and City Council. Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether the signatures had been obtained fromthe immediate area. Ms. Caruth stated the signatures had been obtained throughout the entire City, ChairmanSeegers stated he was unable to accept the petitions because the date was incorrect and also because past cases couldnot be considered. Chairman Seegers stated the petitions would be recognized, but not accepted as exhibits.

Chairman Seegers accepted the highlighted list as Exhibit A and the previous rulings, Exhibit B.

Ms. Caruth asked if she could present photographs to the Board. Chairman Seegers stated, if the photographs wouldnot become part of the record, the photographs could be referred to.

Ms. Caruth stated, since 1997, she has been the primary person objecting to the Conditional Use and Variationsrequested at 1855 Oakton. Ms. Caruth stated she lives a little to the east and directly behind Bully Auto. Ms.Caruth stated Bully Auto is not a good neighbor and has never been. Ms. Caruth stated repeated complaints havebeen filed with regard to the upkeep of the property. Ms. Caruth stated the 1997 photos show conditions identical tothose current. Ms. Caruth stated Bully Auto last appeared before the ZBA in August, 2004, and (‘ity Council,October, 2004, and that each denied the request.

Ms. Caruth stated a used car lot requires property 25,000 square feet in size and that Bully Auto’s property is only14,277 square feet.

Ms. (.‘aruth stated both her property and Bully Auto’s property are located in an Al 100 year flood plan. Ms. ( aruthstated, as a result, she is unable to improve her property and asked why Bully Auto is allowed to expand theirs.

Ms. (.aruth read a report prepared by Doug Harnmel oft.amiros I Ed., with regard to the mixed use plan for theOakton Street corridor. Ms. Caruth stated the report indicated auto related uses should be iujnimi7ed. Ms. ( ‘anithread, ‘‘many related uses such as auto repair, new sales and gas stations can negatively impact commercial corridorsby requiring excessive means of automobile access and parking, creating environmental impacts on noise and airquality and compromising the aesthetic theme of the corridor. As specific opportunities arise, such uses should he

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Flenry AvenueCase #10-012-CU -1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 9

relocated to more industrial or auto oriented location in the City.” Ms. Caruth stated Community Development hadtold her the plan fits the plan for the Oakton corridor. Ms. Caruth stated it clearly does not.

Ms. Canith stated there were 23 cars on the lot yesterday and that although the owner stated he allowed CuzzinsRestaurant to park on his lot, that the restaurant displays a sign that indicates parking is available at Bully Auto after6 PM.

Ms. Caruth stated that, in 2004, the petitioner had clearly stated to the ZBA that he had already graded the propertyin preparation of landscaping, but after being denied, poured concrete within a flood plain, which she assumes wasdone without a permit. Ms. Caruth stated she was unable to obtain the documents from the City under her Freedomof Information Act (FOIA) request.

Ms. Caruth asked whether the Board wished to see the photographs. Chairman Seegers replied, no, thank you.

Ms. Caruth stated the Building Code Department does not always physically inspect the site when complaints arefiled. Ms. Caruth stated tires are stored behind the building and milk gallons containing oil by the dumpster. Ms.Caruth stated Mike Spiel was sent out to check two containers of used fluids in the alley behind the fence, but by thetime he arrived, the containers had been removed.

Ms. Caruth stated the paint on the building is peeling. Ms. Caruth stated the 5-foot required setback from the alleyis actually about 3-feet. Ms. Caruth stated when the lawn is mowed, all the garage on the property ends up on hers,which violates the new Ordinance.

Ms. Michele Cederquist, 365 Graceland, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case. Ms.Cederquist read a prepared letter as follows: “I have lived in DP for nearly 30 years, first on Bennett Place then onCraig Drive. Now I am currently a couple of blocks away, on Graceland. I can vaguely remember when thislocation was a 2-pump gas station and very well landscaped and maintained. As the years have gone by, the gaspumps have been removed and the building became an auto repair facility. When I was in my early 20’s, thebusiness was sold to the current owner, Sam. The sale of the property followed shortly thereafter. It was then thatthe upkeep of the property began to deteriorate. I have watched the continued deterioration of this land for manyyears and fail to understand why the owner continues to try to become a used car lot. Each time he has applied, hehas been denied or has withdrawn his request. Now, the City and many residents have spent their time and money toseek out a plan to renew the area of Oakton Street to Lee Street. The plans I have seen and the information I havelistened to, as presented by Camiros Ltd., does not seem to agree to putting a used car lot at one of the gateways toour City. In fact, it would seem that the plan is suggesting these type of uses should be phased out or relocated to amore auto related area of the City. I hope that the ZBA for the City of Des Plaines will once again recommenddenial of this request. Thank you.”

Chairman Seegers called for additional questions or comments from members of the audience.

Mr. Brian Burkross, 2133 Webster Lane, 1)es Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this ease. Mr.Burkro.ss stated he would keep his comments short because others made the same points. Mr. Burkross stated heintended to wait until the end, but that he had to leave. Mr. Burkross stated he want to point out that even thoughsome of the petition details may have been omitted, it would not be difficult to obtain many, many more signatures.Mr. Burkross stated, generally, many residents feel there are enough car sales in the City and do not share anyenthusiasm for growing that number.

Mr. [3urkross stated he has actively attended the past City Councii hearings and noticed the same request is maderepeatedly and repeatedly denied. Mr. Burkross stated City Council denial resulted, in part, from the owners brokenpromises to the residents with regard to improvements [on the sitej. Mr. Burkross stated, to date, no improvementshad been made. Mr. Burkross noted the petitioner is very diligent about returning before the ZI3A and City (‘ouncilbut shows no good faith as thr as making improvements or taking suggestions.

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU -480 PotterRoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Henry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 10

Mr. Burkross stated, in his opinion, if approval were granted, the City would be rewarding land owners for shunningthe process. Mr. Burkross stated he feels that granting approval would set a bad example for others looking toestablish businesses in Des Plaines. Mr. Buricross stated he did not feel it was fair to other businesses and residentswho follow i-ules and make every effort to be good neighbors. Mr. Burkross noted Bully Auto has sold cars in thepast, even though they are not licensed to do so. Mr. Burkross stated it was wrong to approve the request for autosales. Mr. Burkross stated that, if perhaps, Bully Auto would have completed the items and upgrades promised andhad, in any way, demonstrated good faith to the neighbors, the issue would not be so controversial.

Former Alderman Patricia Beauvais, who was sworn in earlier, stated she wished to address the Conditional Usefindings, Item B - Proposed Causes are found to be in accordance with the objectives of the City’s ComprehensivePlan: Ms. Beauvais stated the Comment indicates the 2007 Comprehensive Plan recommends commercial use forthis site. Ms. Beauvais noted Oakton Street is obviously all commercial, hut that the Comment does not address thespecific issue of an auto corridor.

Citing Item C - Proposed Use as designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriatein appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity. Ms. Beauvais stated this is exactlywhat she had spoken to previously - not following the City’s Ordinances or maintenance requirements. Ms.Beauvais noted that if Bully Auto did not follow these as an auto repair shop, she does not believe they will maintainthe property any better under a Conditional Use.

Citing Item 0 - Proposed Conditional Use does not involve uses, activities processes, materials equipment andconditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons property or general welfare, etc. Ms. Beauvais statedthe use is, in fact, detrimental to the property, neighborhood and most definitely an eyesore when driving downOakton. Ms. Beauvais thanked the Board.

Chairman Seegers called for additional questions or comments from members of the audience. No persons cameforward.

Chairman Seegers called for questions or comments by members of the Board. None were raised.

A motion was made by Porada, seconded by Hollwrr, to recoinniend the request for authorization of theoperation of a motor vehicles sales operation on a lot of less than 25,000 square feet in the C-3 District beDEN TED.

Mr. Szaho stated, although the Board is required to vole on what is presented, the request appears to be too much forthe lot. Chairman Seegers confirmed the lot is undersized.

Mr. Porada stated he fads, generally, decisions relating to these types of facilities/uses were made with an obviouslack of forethought and foresight. Mr. Porada added that piece-meal approvals result in properties in need ofrehabilitation in 10-15 years. Mr. Porada concluded the problem is broader and not particular to this case.

AY hS: Porada, HotlierT, Saletnik, Szabo, (atalano, Seegers

None

MOTION CARRIED

* * ** *

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-01 8-CU - 480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Henry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 11

Case #10-018-CU - 480 Potter Road

Request: A Conditional Use Permit under Section 7.2-4-C of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance,as amended, to authorize the expansion of parking areas at an existing Place of Worship inthe R-1 District.

Mr. Fazal Mahmood, 9239 Aspen Lane, Des Plaines, Illinois; and engineer Peter Olesen were sworn in to givetestimony in this case.

Mr. Mahmood stated the existing facility operates as a Place of Worship with an existing parking lot on the eastside. Mr. Mahmood stated approximately 100 cars use the facility during the five (5) daily prayer services andschool on Saturday and Sunday. Mr. Mahrnood stated they are now seeking an extension of the parking lot on thevest side, where additional property had been purchased. Mr. Mahmood stated worship extends to 11 PM on Fridaynights. Mr. Mahmood stated worship was divided into two shifts as a result of parking limitations. Mr. Mahmoodstated most park in the church lot and the rest across the street. Mr. Mahrnood stated the objective of the request isto eliminate on-street parking. Mr. Mahmood stated a second exit on Potter Road is also planned. Mr. Mahmoodadded that permission had been received from Cook County. Mr. Mahmood stated 480 Potter Road also ownsadditional neighboring properties.

Chairman Seegers inquired as to how many additional spaces would result from the new parking lot. Mr. Mahmoodstated the net gain would be 23 or 24 parking spaces because five were lost as a result of the Potter Road exit.Chairman Seegers inquired as to the total number of parking that would then exist. Mr. Mahmood statedapproximately 120. Mr. Mahmood added that during Ramadan, an agreement exists with Lutheran General whoallows parking at its building across the street during nightly prayer between 10 and 11 PM.

Chairman Seegers inquired as to the other properties owned. Mr. Mahmood stated the property adjacent to the southis owned by someone else, but that the property is still in discussion, but added the property south of that is currentlyowned.

Chairman Seegers confirmed the only improvement planned was the additional parking. Mr. Mahmood confirmedthat was correct.

Chairman Seegers asked if Mr. Olesen had anything to add. Mr. Olesen stated plans have been submitted forpermits and have been approved subject to obtaining the Variation to construct the lot. Mr. Olesen stated, withrespect to storm water management, both the City’s requirements and those of the Metropolitan Water ReclamationDistrict (MWRD) have been met.

Mr. Olesen stated the parking lot lighting would be minimal and that his understanding is that the lot would be litonly during the periods used for safety. Chairman Seegers confirmed the proposed lighting would comply with theCity’s Ordinance. Mr. Olesen confirmed it would and added there would be no spill over the property line. Mr.Mahmood confirmed the lights are currently timed to turn off between 10 and 11 PM each day.

Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether landscaping was also proposed. Mr. Olesen confirmed ii was.

Chairman Seegers called for questions of the petitioner by members of the Board.

Mr. Porada inquired as to Staffs concern relating to Condition #1. Mr. Mangum stated the Engineering Divisionhad reviewed the proposed plans and wanted to ensure vehicles had the ability to turn around if access to thewestern most portion of the lot was full. Mr. Olesen stated there was no problem in meeting that requirement.

Referencing Condition #2, Mr. Porada confirnied the Islamic Community Center currently utilizes two trafficmanagement personnel to manage pro-service pedestrian crossing on Potter Road. Mr. Mahmood confIrmed that

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 1-lenry AvenueCase #1 0-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 12

two off-duty police officers assist pedestrians every Friday and also during the month of Ramadan. Mr. Poradainquired whether the use of the officers was required by the City. Mr. Mangurn stated the pedesian assistancecould be required as part of the Conditional Use. Mr. Mangum added Engineering personnel visited the site andfound it works well.

Mr. Porada inquired as to the parking at the Lutheran General facility. Mr. Mahmood stated that property is usedonly during Rarnadan.

Mr. Porada inquired as to whether this is the second Conditional Use request for this property. Mr. Mangurn statedit was a modification to the original Conditional Use that was required for construction.

Mr. Porada inquired as to whether multiple shifts could be implemented during Rarnadan. Mr. Mahinood statedthey could not. Mr. Porada confirmed the Community Center voluntarily devised shifts for worship. Mr. Mahmoodconfirmed that was correct. Mr. Porada noted that, as a religious organization, the Center was not required to do so.Mr. Porada stated his appreciation of the measures taken by the Center.

Referencing Condition #2 and expressing concerns of safety, Mr. Hoffierr inquired whether the additional parkingwould eliminate parking across the street on Potter Road. Mr. Mahmood stated many members live in theneighborhood and walk to services. Mr. Mahmood added he encourages members in the vicinity to walk.

Chairman Seegers called for additional questions of the petitioner by members of the Board.

Mr. Catalano inquired as to whether the lighting on the new lot would mirror that on the existing lot. Mr. Mahmoodconfirmed it would. Mr. Catalano inquired as to why there were no Conditions pertaining to lighting included in theStaff Report as on the previous request. Mr. Mangum stated such Conditions can be attached and added that Staffhad already seen the Photometric plan for this particular site and is confident the issue of light spill is addressed.

Chairman Seegers called for questions or comments by members of the Board, either in favor of or in objection tothe proposal.

Staff Report:

Chairman Seegers called for questions or comments by members of the audience, either in favor of, or in objectionto the proposal.

Mr. John Milstead, 2515 Church, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Mr. Milstead stated he is retired and home all day. Mr. Milstead staled he does not mind on-street parking one (lay aweek even though it tends to make traffic difficult, Mr. Milstead stated his objection to illegal parking. Mr.Milstead stated Des Plaines Police issued 22 tickets two weeks ago and 18 tickets last Friday fir illegal parking.Mr. Milstead stated that the addition of 23 parking is not adequate. Mr. Milstead stated the illegal parking includesparking in front of fire hydrants.

Mr. Terrance Mouton, 489 Good Avenue, I Jes Plumes, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimoily in this ease. Mr.Mouton stated he lives directly behind tlic Community (‘enter and his issue is the fact that the occupancy exceedsthe 1999 request for Conditional Use. Mr. Mouton stated his recollection horn the last community meeting was thata document showing the Conditional Use was limited to 250 persons and gran ted wit hou i I he hi resight as to howmany people would actually be on premises. Mr. Mooton expressed concern over the imiability to entbrce what isgranted. Mr. Mootoo expressed further concern that allowing the parking lot would only allow the growth tocontinue and further encroach on the neighbors. Mr. Mouton inquired as to how many persons are permitted. MrMarigum stated he does not believe the Conditional Lse places a limit on the number of persons and added thatparking is based on square footage. Mr. Mangum stated that, at the time of the original request, the parking required

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (contd)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Henry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 13

was 50-something and that 70-something parking spaces, which exceeded the Code requirement, were provided atthat time. Mr. Mangurn noted the current demand is greater. Mr. Mootoo suggested the growing demand is beingcreated by the Conditional Use. Mr. Mangum noted the Conditional Use authorized the construction of the facility.

Mr. Mootoo inquired as to whether the Mosque growth had been anticipated. Chairman Seegers stated the originalPemmit had been issued based on the parking required under Ordinance at the time. Mr. Mootoo expressed hisdispleasure that additional parking was now being requested and inquired as to the size that was approved at the timethe original Conditional Use was granted. Mr. Porada suggested Mr. Mootoo was confusing an Occupancy Permitwith Conditional Use. Mr. Mootoo stated the congregation had nearly doubled, with 470 members.

Mr. Porada noted the City cannot legally prevent persons from practicing their faith at any location. Mr. Mootoostated the issue is not of persons practicing their faith - that the issue is the size and encroachment and the resultantnuisances created. Mr. Mootoo stated he believes the Center should live within its means and that the sizeassociated with the original [Conditional Use] Permit be maintained instead of being allowed to become a nuisanceto its neighbors. Mr. Mootoo stated he and his neighbors are prepared to take action in Circuit Court and will seekmonetary relief. Chairman Seegers asked Mr. Mootoo to state only facts and discouraged threats. Mr. Mootoostated he felt that fact was that the original Conditional Use had been violated. Mr. Mootoo added the Center wasnot prevented fi-om cutting down all the buffering trees in 2008 in order to expand the lot which created water runoffto his property as well as increased noise and vehicle exhaust emission.

Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the building had changed in size over the years. Mr. Mangum stated he was notaware of any such change. Mr. Manguni added the original Conditional Use was granted in 1999 but that there wasa delay in construction and that the Mosque was actually constructed in 2005. Mr. Porada explained the ConditionalUse allowed the property to be used as a Place of Worship. Mr. Saletnik inquired as to whether any Conditionsrelating to size were imposed at the time of first construction. Mr. Mangum stated he did not have all the supportinginformation, but added that a Conditional Use Permit does not include size restrictions. Mr. Saletnik noted anOccupancy Permit is based upon the Building Code Inspection, which is conducted not only to ensure the structureis built in the manner proposed, but also based on the square footage of the building.

Mr. Mootoo stated he is not confused - that the Conditional Use originally sought allowed the premises to operate asa Mosque for 250 people and that the membership is now 470. Mr. Mootoo reiterated additional parking would onlyexacerbate the existing problem. Mr. Saletnik suggested it could aid in alleviating the problem. Mr. Mootoosuggested prevention is better than cure. Mr. Mootoo stated the City should have prevented the Mosque fromgrowing so large and creating these problems. Mr. Mootoo added the idea to provide shifts for worship resultedfrom community meetings. Mr. Mootoo expressed his disappointment that it appeared the Board has already madeits decision.

Mr. Kennedy Shenherg, 449 Good Street, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Mr. Shenberg stated he has two Masters I)egrees, one in Clinical Counseling and the other in Social Work and iscurrently working on a 1)octorate in Education. Mr. Stenberg stated he works for the Department of Children andFamily Services (DCFS) as a supervisor in child abuse investigations. Mr. Stenberg stated he supervised the ChildMissing l.ocation Unit for three years and that, during this period, he found 500 of the 501 children with which hewas charged. Mr. Stenherg stated he is knowledgeable of what he speaks. Mr. Stenberg stated child abductors findopen spaces to park in order to observe children. Mr. Stenherg expressed concern over the proximity of a child carecenter, the residential yards where children play and the school bus stop. Mr. Stenberg stated he lives directlybehind the parking lot and has three children of his own. Mr. Stenberg expressed concern over the deep recession ofthe proposed lot as well as its proximity to the Dempster entrance to 1-294. Mr. Stenherg cited the following factsrelative to child abductions: If a child is not found within the first hour of disappearance, chances of finding thechild alive decrease by 50% and, after 24 hours, the chances become zero. Mr. Stcnberg stated there is a 95%chance the child will be found dead if not fixind within the first day. Mr. Stenberg stated it takes approximately anhour for a child to vanish. Mr. Stenberg asked the members of the l3oard to consider how far one can drive in an


hour. Mr. Stenberg reiterated his concern is for his as well as other area children and urged the Board to find othersolutions - one that will not create such a hazard for the community.

Mr. Stenberg stated 20 parking spaces is not adequate to accommodate 100 cars. Mr. Stenberg stated any spacesopened on the side streets as a result will only be taken by others.

Mr. Porada inquired as to whether strange cars are ever parked in the lot. A woman waiting to speak indicated theyare. Mr. Porada suggested a metal gate that can be hinged and locked. Mr. Olesen stated there would be additionalcost and that gates would not be practical at the Potter Road exit. Mr. Olesen added the same risks exist at everyschool and other locations where children are present. Mr. Mahmood stated his plan to fence the property oncePotter Road construction was complete. Mr. Mahmood stated video cameras extend to the back of the property.

Ms. Elizabeth Papanastasopoulos, 2561 Church, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated her home is the second property west of Potter and that her backyard and deck facethe Mosque. Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated her parents purchased the property in 1970 and that she has lived in thehome since 1985. Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated she was one of the only neighbors not initially opposed to theMosque.

Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated the existing fence has been in disrepair for two years. Ms. Papanastasopoulos statedthat although the lights in the parking lot turn off at 10 or 11 PM, car lights shine into her bedroom, deck and patio.Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated the fence is inadequate. Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated it will take years for the trees togrow and that it will continue to be challenging to obscure the view of the growing facility.

Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated she observes people looking down upon her when she is in her yard and thatarguments, motorcycles and racing after hours continue to be disruptive. Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated basketball,soccer and football take place during the day and that the balls end up in her yard. Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated thechildren scale her fence to retrieve the balls and use her furniture to stand on. Ms. Papanastasoopoulos expressedconcern that the sports activities will be moved to the new parking area.

Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated she does not receive mail on Fridays because of the parking problems. Ms.Papanastasopoulos stated the off-duty officers employed on Fridays to assist pedestrian traffic are something shewould expect in downtown Chicago with whistles blowing from Noon to 3 P. M.

Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated the Board is welcome to come to her house to observe the conditions she described.Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated she is tired of calling 911 and that the police are also tired of the calls.

Ms. Papanastasopoulos reiterated she previously supported the Mosque.

Ms. Pam Warford, 2530 Church Street, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case. Ms.Warford stated her agreement with the freedom to practice religious beliefs but expressed concern that only therights of the Center were being protected and her belief that it was unfair that the rights of the neighbors remainedunaddressed.

Ms. Warford inquired as to how many Board members had visited the site since the trees were torn clown .Atbwmembers indicated they had. Ms. Warford stated the first thing that was done when the Mosque acquired theproperty was to cut down the trees. Ms. Wartbrd stated the emotion involved is because, previous to the Mosqueand the destruction of the trees, residents enjoyed the luxury of large parcels of land in a country setting with lots ofgreenery and many beautiful old trees. Ms. Warford cited it was difficult to view the Mosque as a good neighbor asa result. Ms. Warford suggested all of tlie distress could have been avoided if the parties involved had waited andplanned.

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (contd)Case #10-01 7-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU - 480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 I-Ienry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 15

Ms. Warford requested the matter at issue be postponed. Ms. Warford added the neighbors and Mosque wereattempting to discuss the issues with the help of the Alderman, who set up meeting last summer at Maine Township.

Ms. Warford stated that Mike Conlan, Director, Department Community and Economic Development and the CityManager both attended. Ms. Warford stated residents were told the issues would be taken under review by theEconomic Development Committee of the City Council and she only found out by accident that that was no longer

the case.

Ms. Warford stated her agreement that 20 spaces were insufficient to provide relief to the parking problem. Ms.

Warford noted that parking is restricted on the side of Church Street where fire hydrants exist and that prevents the

mail from being delivered on the opposite side.

Noting the lateness of the hour, Ms. Warlord suggested there are too many issues to address tonight. Ms. Warfordasked the Board to keep in mind this is not a place of worship that is utilized only once a week, but an activecommunity center.

Ms. Warford stated residents want peace and quiet when they come home but instead often return to damage to their

property. Ms. Warlord respectfully requested other solutions than to make a decision tonight.

Ms. Warford stated that continued discussion could result in Conditions being attached. Ms. Warlord expressedconcern over this parcel of land being just one piece of a larger plan, including a pending land swap. Ms. Warford

stated it is imperative that residents reclaim their neighborhood without denying their right to worship.

Chairman Seegers noted the ZBA meeting was posted. Ms. Warlord stated only on Potter Road, where the legal

address exists and which is under construction.

Ms. Anna Marzec, 485 Good Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois was sworn in to give testimony in this case. Ms. Marzecstated her parents live on Good Avenue and are most affected. Ms. Marzec stated the Mosque purchased theresidential property next to her parents. Ms. Marzec inquired as to why the property was allowed to be such a messand inquired as to who was responsible for cleaning the property. Ms. Marzec expressed dismay that 150 trees were

cut overnight and a view that was once of a forest is now a view of a gigantic Mosque. Ms. Marzec expressedconcern that Des Plaines does not have restrictions on cutting trees like Park Ridge. Ms. Marzec offered to send

photographs of the dirt and garbage and general disarray of the property.

Mr. Saletnik stated the Board prides itself on considering all aspects of each case and making decisions on theindividual merit(s).

Mr. Tom 1-lan-is, 348 Good, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Mr. Harris stated the neighbors’ objective is not to prevent one’s right to exercise their religious beliefs, but to secure

their own rights as citizens and homeowners who have put a lot of money into their homes. Mr. Harris stated the

neighbors are merely trying to protect their property and families. Mr. Harris stated his agreement that the rights of

the residents have not been addressed. Mr. Harris stated it was unjust to invoke the religious aspects into issues thathave nothing to do with religious freedom. Mr. Harris reiterated the residents are simply asking for an extension oftime. Mr. Harris noted it would be meaningful if someone from the ZBA would serve as a proponent of theresidents.

Mr. Porada stated he sensed the friction results fonu the number of years that the residents enjoyed oversized lots

and a wooded area that provided a country setting. Mr. Porada stated lie purchased a home where it was unlikely the

surrounding conditions would change. Mr. Porada stated the neighbors did not own all of the property in the area

and, therefore, are unable to retain the bucolic setting.

Mr. Szabo expressed concern over Continuing the matter.

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-01 8-CU - 480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Henry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 16

Chairman Seegers noted the ZBA was not privy to the community meetings.

Mr. Saletnik suggested the Board be polled.

Mr. Szabo stated he felt approval of additional parking would set a bad precedent for this location, particularly inlight of the fact that the Center owns another large piece of property to the south. Mr. Szabo stated the Mosque wasfortunate to have grown in size, but expressed concern over the continued intrusion into the surroundingneighborhood, which existed prior to the Mosque. Mr. Szabo expressed concern over the destruction of the qualityof life in the area and suggested a shuttle service during Rarnadan.

Mr. Atanlleh Mohammed, 9123 Potter Road, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this matter.Mr. Mohammed stated he lives in the apartments adjacent to the Mosque. Mr. Mohammed stated he appreciatedeveryone staying so late and stated his understanding of the neighbor’s sentiments. Mr. Mohammed stated, as amember and volunteer of the Mosque, he works very closely with the administration. Mr. Mohammed stated theCenter wishes to work with the neighbors and take into consideration any of the zoning and neighborhood issuesthat need to be resolved.

Mr. Mohammed stated the reason for the request is to alleviate some of the problems that culTently exist. Mr.Mohammed stated his understanding of the neighbors’ interest, emotion and other investment, but stated the Mosqueis also part of the neighborhood and wishes to be more involved in the neighborhood. Mr. Mohammed stated theCenter wants to make sure the neighbors’ peace and privacy are respected.

Chairman Seegers noted an opportunity to meet was requested to address items of safety, noise and parking.Mr. Mohammed stated he would love to invite the residents to meet with the administration and that he welcomedsuch a Condition being included along with a measurable way to make sure it would happen. Mr. Mohammed statedtrespassing and destruction was not acceptable. Mr. Saletnik noted the ZBA Hearing was the only venue in whichpotential Conditions could be addressed and that would require a Continuance.

Mr. Porada stated he had interest in reviewing some of the prior documentation.

Chairman Seegers stated Mr. Mabmood had the choice of Continuing the case in order to meet with the neighbors orhave a decision rendered this evening. Mr. Mabmood stated he would prefer the decision be made this evening.

Mr. Saletnik inquired as to whether the ZBA had the ability to recommend City Council appoint a mediator beforeany further action is taken. Mr. Szabo stated it is incumbent upon petitioners to meet with neighbors to iron out anydifferences - that City Council does not have the ability to appoint such a person but reiterated it is in all parties’ bestinterest to remedy the issues that exist. Chairman Seegers noted City Council received copies of the ZBA minutes.

Mr. Sajid Afzal and his wife, 446 Good Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois, were sworn in to give testimony in this case.Mr. Afzal stated he is in a unique position as a member of both the Mosque and the community and understandsboth sides. Mr. Afzal stated he has the same stake in the neighborhood and agrees with time grievances stated. Mr.Afzal stated his affiliation with the Mosque does not make him prone to allow the Mosque to do anything they wantMr. Afzal expressed concern over the animosity and hostility that exists. Mr. Afzal stated he has only lived in thearea br three years hut does not want to raise his family in a hostile enviromnent.

Mr. AIzal stated his belief that the additional parking would alleviate sonic of the existing problems. Mr. Afzalstated with that issue addressed tonight, they will have the ability to move onto the next stage. Mr. AFzal stated theMosque wants to establish relations with its neighbors. Mr. Afzal stated he does not believe the Mosque has done asmuch as it should to that end. Mr.Afzal stated that doing so is not only the right thing to do, but is actually anArticle of their faith — to be sure the neighbors are completely content and that the Mosque is not impeding uponthem. Mr. APzal stated the ssue must he resolved. As a resident, Mr. Afzal volunteered to scri.e as an intermediaryto the Mosque. Mr. Afal agreed to a sit-down meeting to negotiate even if the result extended beyond (‘ity

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU - 480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Henry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 17

Ordinances Mrs. Afzal stated she does not have much to add - that her husband stated their viewpoint beautifully.Mrs. Afzal stated she is a teacher and apologized for the behavior of the teenagers who are disrupting the neighbors.Mrs. Afzal asked that the Mosque not be held responsible for teen behaviors.

Mrs. Afzal agreed the area is ugly and dirty and stated she is also tired of looking at it and urged the ZBA not todelay any longer.

Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated she also teaches at the high school and some of the children offer their apologies onMonday morning. Ms. Papanastasopoulos stated the meeting last summer was heated but that constructivesuggestions resulted - such as shuttles to the church on Ballard Road, an underground parking structure and the like.Ms. Papanastasopoulos asked for the opportunity to allow the residents and the Mosque to negotiate further sincenothing had transpired since. Ms. Papanastasopoulosstated this case was no different than the auto dealer case heardearlier and urged the Board not to take any action this evening.

Mr. Jose Garcia, 420 Good Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Mr. Garcia stated he believes there are too many meetings like this one - a lot of talk and no solution. Mr. Garciastated the police have been called too many times without any solution to the problems that exist. Mr. Garciasuggested more meetings are not the answer.

Chairman Seegers sought feedback from members of the Board. Mr. Szabo stated he believes approval would set abad precedent and that it would only be a band-aid to a much larger problem. Mr. Szabo noted that if the entityinvolved were a widget factory, the ZBA would surely deny the request.

A motion was made by Szabo, seconded by Porada, to recommend the expansion of parking areas at anexisting Place of Worship in the R-l District be DENIED.

Mr. Porada stated many issues raised have nothing to do with the Conditional Use request currently before theBoard. Mr. Porada noted these type of hearings oflen spin out of control as a result of tit-for-tat issues. Mr. Poradaexpressed concern of precedent and changing the character within neighborhood. Mr. Porada noted that, given thenumber of parcels of land involved, a monolithic institutional use between Potter and Good could result. Mr. Poradastated his vote is based solely on use of property and precedent approval would set and has nothing to do with anyother issues.

Mr. Saletnik stated to vote down is like running away from the problem. Mr. Saletnik stated he would like moreinformation about what transpired in the past and what is/is not legally applicable. Mr. Saletnik noted the size of theproposed parking lot is not large enough to solve the problem. Mr. Saletnik expressed concern of the land swapdiscussed by petitioner. Mr. Saletnik stated his opinion that adequate onsite parking is required to alleviate the maildelivery and other problems that exist and that this can only be accomplished with an integrated plan.

Mr. Szabo stated he did not feel rehashing the matter would be productive and that is why he made a motion to voteon the matter before the Board this evening. Mr. Porada stated his agreement. Mr. Porada noted it was thepetitioners choice to have a decision this evening.

Mr. floetlierr suggested that, if the request were denied, that the Mosque return with a more comprehensive parkingplan. Mr. Hoelherr suggested alternative solutions may better address the concerns raised. Mr. Hofherr stated hisagreement that 23 parking spaces are not adequate to address the cuirent parking problem.

Chairman Seegers stated the letter issued by the ZBA must include items to support the recommendation made.Chairman Seegers stated the fact that the proposal does not solve the issue is a valid reason, as is mail delivery andissues of safety. Chairman Scegers agreed that these issues must he addressed before a Conditional Use isconsidered.

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (contd)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Flenry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 18

AYES: Szabo, Porada, Hofherr, Seegers

NAYES: Saletnik, Catalano

MOTION CARRIED

* * ***

Chairman Seegers encouraged the Mosque and the neighbors to work together to solve the existing issues.

, J


Case #10-015-V — 1451 henry Avenue

Request: A Variation to Section 7.2-4-D of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to

legalize the construction of a deck with a 1-foot 6-inch side yard setback where a minimum

side yard setback of 5-feet is required hy Code within the R-1 Zoning District.

Mr. Ron Lundgreri, 1141 Lee Street, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Mr. Lundgren stated he built a deck in the back yard and that it is too close, approximately 18 inches, from the

neighbor’s fence. Mr. Lundgren stated he is now seeking a Variance, at the suggestion of Al Biancalana, Building

Department, because the Ordinance requires a 5-foot setback.

Mr. Lundgren stated it is a nice deck and that the neighbors are happy with it. Mr. Lundgren stated none expressed

any complaint and that each signed the acknowledgement.

Mr. Lundgren stated he and his wife would appreciate it if the Board would allow them to keep the deck.

Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether the deck had been built with a Pennit. Mr. Lundgren stated it had not.

Mr. Lundgren stated he is aware that if the Variance is granted, he is required to pay double the Permit fee.

Referencing the aerial photo, Chairman Seegers inquired as to the placement of the deck. Mr. Lundgren stated the

tree in the yard had been struck by lightning several times and had been removed. Chairman Seegers confirmed the

structure had been built over the root area. Mr. Lundgren confirmed that was correct.

Chairman Seegers confirmed the construction of the deck was one that is floating and not one that is permanent.

Mr. Lundgren confirmed that was correct. Chairman Seegers confirmed there is no concrete foundation. Mr.

Lundgren confirmed that was correct.

Mr. Porada inquired as to how long Mr. Lundgren has lived in Des Plaines. Mr. Lundgren stated he has lived in Des

Plaines for approximately 40 years. Mr. Porada inquired as to what Mr. Lundgren does for a living. Mr. Lundgren

stated he is a machinistlplant manager. Mr. Porada inquired as to how long Mr. Lundgren has lived in the home.

Mr. Lundgren stated approximately one year. Noting Mr. Lundgren grew up in Des Plaines, Mr. Porada inquired as

to whether any improvements had been made at Mr. Lundgren’s parents’ home. Mr. Lundgren stated nothing that

ever required a permit - that they just painted the house approximately every three years. Mr. Lundgren stated he

did not have to call Julie because he did not dig and, as a result, thought it would be okay. Mr. hindgren stated the

deck is not attached to the house.

Mr. Porada confirmed the deck encroaches on the side yard. Mr. Lundgren stated it does, to the east. Mr. Porada

cited his personal policy to never approve after-the-fact Variations. Mr. Porada noted the floating deck could easily

he made to conform. Mr. I .undgren stated he would prefer not to move the deck. Mr. Porada noted that Staff more

otten than not recommends approval of zoning requests, but in this case, Staff reconimended denial.

Mr. Porada inquired as to the size of the lot. Mr. Mangum stated the lot is 50-feet wide. Mr. Porada noted the deck

is 19-feet by 24-feet. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the petitioner had been provided a copy of the Staff Report.

Mr. Manguin contirmed he had.

Mr. Floflierr noted Building Permits are required so that inspections are made to ensure proper installation. Mr.

l{ulherr questioned whether footings are required. Mr. Hofiierr reiterated the fact that the deck extending too close

to the neighbor’s property is also a major problem and violation of City Code. Mr. Lundgren stated that, although

the deck is built too close to the property line, it is well built. Mr. Lundgren noted that if it were cement, there

would he no issue. Mr. 1.undgen asked ifhe would have to return beibre the ZBA if he chose to reduce the size and

install brick payers and whether he would have to pay an additional fee. Mr. 1-lofherr stated he was unaware of the

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V -1415 1-lenry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 20

procedure. Mr. Mangum stated he would check Building Code to ascertain whether a raised patio is considered astructure.

Mr. Lundgren inquired as to whether it is possible to have the Variance approved and how others obtain approval.Mr. Szabo stated each case is unique and determined as a result of individual circumstances. Mr. Lundgrenreiterated that the deck is a positive improvement and asiced the Board to consider that it has not caused any frictionwith his neighbors. Mr. Saletnik asked how the City was informed. Mr. Mangum stated he was unsure but thatoften these issues result from a complaint to Code Enforcement, but could not be sure that was the case in thisparticular instance.

Mr. Dan Dicks, 1435 Flenry, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Mr. Dicks stated Mr. Saletnik and Chairman Seegers know him and were on the Board when he received a Variancefor his porch. Mr. Dicks stated every lot on the block is non-conforming. Mr. Dicks added his garage is 18-inchesfrom the lot line, as is his neighbors’. Mr. Dicks asked the Board to consider the extenuating circumstances in thisparticular neighborhood. Mr. Dicks stated everything requires a Variance and asked the Board to consider approvalin light of Mr. Dicks’ wife’s health. Mr. Dicks stated she has lived in the home, where she raised four children, for24 years. Mr. Dicks added Mrs. Lund gren has had six back surgeries in recent years and has limited mobility andthat, in addition to the non-conformance of the lots, should be considered a hardship.

Mr. Dicks stated Mr. 1.undgren’s intention was not to skate on a permit. Mr. Dicks stated Mr. Lundgren is aware hedid not proceed properly. Mr. Dicks asked the Board show consideration for the work done and allow a long timeresident the ability to enjoy her property. Mr. Lundgren confirmed the neighbors do not have problem with thedeck.

Chairman Seegers called for the Staff Report to be read by Mr. Manguni.

Staff Report:

Chairman Seegers called for questions of Mr. Manguni by members of the Board. None were raised.

Chairman Seeger stated the definition of a deck, versus a patio, is at issue. Chairman Seegers stated a deck is raisedabove ground and considered a structure and noted this falls somewhere in between. Chairman Seegers noted thatreducing the deck by 3.5-feet is not the best proportion for the deck. Mr. Szabo stated his agreement.

A motion was made by Szabo, seconded by Catalano, to legalize the construction of a deck with a I-foot 6-inch side yard setback where a minimum side yard setback of 5-feet is required by Code within the R-1Zoning District.

Mr. Flotherr stated that including a Condition to reduce the width to meet current (‘ode would present no hardship.Mr. Szabo stated his motion remains as stated.

Mr. Saletnik stated he has personally dealt with trees with low root structure and considers Mother Nature anothercieated hardship.

AYhS: Szaho. (‘ata ann, Saletnik, Seegers

NAVES: Hofherr, Porada

MOTION CARRIKI)

1

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)

Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton Street

Case #10-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Henry Avenue

Case #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 21

Case #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee Street

Request: A Conditional Use Permit under Section 7.3-6-C of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance,

as amended, to authorize the operation of a money transfer (Currency Exchange) operation

in the C-3 District.

Mr. Dickran Hanowick, 1108 Lee Street, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Mr. Porada inquired as to the relationship of Mr. Hanowick to the petitioner, Mr. Leon Levikov. Mr. Hanowick

stated he is the General Manager for the business. Mr. Hofherr inquired as to whether Mr. Hanowick owns the

property. Mr. Hanowick stated the property is leased. Chairman Seegers inquired as to Mr. Levikov’s position. Mr.

Hanowick stated Mr. Levikov is another manager. Chairman Seegers confirmed both gentlemen are from the same

company. Mr. Hanowick confirmed that was correct. Mr. Hanowick added Mr. Levikov had to leave town on an

emergency. Mr. Hanowick stated he requested Mr. Levikov pursue this matter. Mr. Hofherr confirmed Mr.

Hanowick also operates out of the Des Plaines location. Mr. Hanowick confirmed he does.

Chairman Seegers noted that no ownership was present. Mr. Mangum stated the owner had signed the application

but was not present. Chainnan Seegers inquired as to whether the owner was aware of the request. Mr. Flanowick

stated he is. Mr. Saletnik inquired as to whether any physical changes to the property are planned. Mr. Hanowick

stated none are. Mr. Saletnik inquired as to whether any of the walls would be changed. Mr. Flanowick stated none

would. Mr. Saletnik inquired about the construction of a pass-through window. Mr. Hanowick stated a portion of

the building had been specified for this use.

Mr. Szabo inquired as to the nature of the business and whether it would operate as a currency exchange. Mr.

Hanowick stated the business would not operate as a traditional currency exchange, but provide limited services,

such as wire transfers. Mr. Salentik confirmed the business transfers funds back and forth overseas. Mr. Hanowick

stated also within the United States. Mr. Porada confirmed the business acts as an intermediary service for the

transfer of funds using cash or credit card. Mr. Flanowick confirmed that was correct. Mr. Porada inquired as to

whether other services, such as check cashing, were applicable. Mr. Hanowick stated if possible. Mr. Porada

inquired as to whether the reason for the currency exchange classification resulted from the money transfer service.

Mr. Mangum stated the zoning classification was determined by the Zoning Administrator because no classification

specific to this type of business exists. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether Staff would recommend in lvor of a full

currency exchange. Mr. Mangum stated Staffs recommendation was based on the petitioner’s request. Mr. Porada

asked whether that was acceptable to Mr. Hanowick. Mr. Hanowick stated that he would operate within the limits

of whatever the City permits. Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether loans would be made. Mr. Ilanowick stated

none would. Mr. Porada inquired as to the definition of a currency exchange. Mr. Manguin stated the Ordinance

does not provide a definition. Mr. Porada suggested a definition is required. Chairman Seegers stated his

agreement. Mr. Saletnik noted a money transfer can be made two ways. Mr. 1-lanowick stated he only wishes to

have the ability to send money. Mr. Porada expressed concern over the volume of traffic and parking associated

with the operation of a traditional currency exchange. Mr. Szabo inquired as to whether a money transfer store still

exists on Prairie Street. Mr. Porada stated he is unsure, hut is aware of the business to which Mr. Szabo referred.

Mr. Hanowick inquired as to whether he was also permitted to operate his jewelry business at the proposed location.

Chairman Seegers stated that was a separate issue. Mr. Porada noted a business license would be required. Mr.

Saletnik stated jewelers normally operate in a typical retail environment. Mr. Hanowick stated he has a business

license. Mr. Hofherr inquired as to whether the business license pertained to this location. Mr. 1-lanowick stated the

business license is applicable to another location. Chainnan Seegers added that the jcwclry stole/repair is a

pennitted use.

Chairman Seegers called for the Staff Report to he read by Mr. Mangum.

Staff Report:


Chairman Seegers stated he did not see a plan illustrating the interior alterations required for the proposed use. Mr.Mangum confirmed only the window was constructed.

Citing the Plan of Operation, Mr. Saletnik noted the plan indicated a motor vehicle and parts sales business with twoemployees. Mr. Hanowick confirmed that was correct. Mr. Saletnik confirmed the petitioner intended to add thisservice within the existing business. Mr. Hanowick confirmed that was correct.

Chairman Seegers called for questions or comments by members of the audience, either in favor of or in objection tothe proposal. No persons were present in the audience.

A motion was made by Saletnik, seconded by Szabo, to recommend authorization of the operation of a moneytransfer (Currency Exchange) operation in the C-3 District, with the added Condition to allow checks to becashed.

MOTION CARRIE!)

*****

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-01 8-CU - 480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Henry AvenueCase #10-012-CU -1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 23

A motion was made by Saletnik, seconded by Catlano, to adjourn the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 12:44 A.M. on Wednesday, May 26, 2010. The next meeting of the Des Plaines Zoning Board of Appeals is l’uesday, June15, 2010.

Respectfully submitted,

A. William Seegers, ChairmanDes Plaines Zoning Board of Appeals

Cc: City OfficialsAldermenCommissioners, Zoning Board of AppealsPetitioner(s)

1. •

jllt iiCITY OF DES PLAINES

1420 Miner / Northwest Highway * Des Plaines, Illinois 60016 — 4498 * (847) 391 — 5300

June 2, 2010

Mayor Moylan and Des Plaines City CouncilCiTY OF DES PLAINES

Subject: Zoning Board of Appeals Case # 10-01 8-CU480 Potter Road

RE: Request to authorize the expansion of parking at a Place of Worship

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Des Plaines City Council:

The Zoning Board of Appeals met on May 25, 2010 to consider the above petition. The Zoning Board ofAppeals submits the following:

1. Mr. Fazal Mabmood and Mr. Peter Olesen, representatives for the petitioner presented thepertinent facts.

2. Ten members of the public testified about the request.

3. The Community Development 1)epartment recommended approval of the modification to theConditional Use Permit, subject to conditions.

4. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended (4-2) to deny the modification to the ConditionalUse Permit for the expansion of parking at a Place of Worship.


Arnie SeegersI)es Plaines Zoning Board of Appeals, Chairman

cc: City OfficialsAldermenZoning Board of Appea Is Commissi oriersPetitionersRecordimig SecretaryFile

AilGchment

FXH IB1T

PARCEL A TRACT OF LAID DESCRIBED Al IOTJ,OWIS 000INlINO AT TIlE OOL1TII103T I 3,il OF TillFOLLOWING DeOCRIIIOD PROPER?! THE NORTH 90 1001 OP Till SOUTh 210 FEET (3CKPT Till WENT 3.1 100?11100101 voLi.ipo lii oooo Avowal) or rut ROSS HALF (1/2) 01 TuE EAST hALF (112) OP 1,0? 1. 08FRhlDIlAICK HIIIRH6UBEN OLV1210N OP 1010DB II SECTIOIIB 15 000 11, rOWIBhhIP 41 NORTH, 000(31 3,2, OMITOF Till THINS PRINCIPAL NEIFDIRJI. IN COOK COUNTY. ILililOXI, ION A FOXIlY OP 00010011W. ITI4EIICKUKIITEISLY ALONG liii ROUIlI LION tHEREOF 142 FliRt’, THONCO 1IOkl’Hllflr,Y Ill FEET. TIIEIICI 810TERLY 1 FOE?,ThENCE ROIIXHEJ0.7 Rh) POET Ti) THE NORTH LINE OP TIlE ABOVE DERCIIBED PROPERTY; 710(011 EASTERLY ALONG‘SHE NORTh LiNE TU0010F 157 FElT; THMJICI 000110(01! ALoNg THI KAIT riot or Till jisovo 015CRIBEDPBOPIII9TT 90 FEB17 SO THE P011T OF 900100110 $ COOK COON?!, 11000010;

OWNER OOHXloUeU?AK!Q OCCUPANTS P004 ‘EXISt ‘0 TONI OF SAID PARCEL 1IZATtir1I 00010 FROhIF000II 100000. Ml) CR0010!?! I JINl1y-.3ii. VIP!, ‘10 PRIOR I - 0010iIigAJm—SulIw9)kBIt OUtDOOR • (Ill WIFE,((OTtO JUNK 12, 1953, AND REC000ID kU0uJW2’:-L5.3, AN OOCI)NlR1’1170131) OVER THI SOOTH 10 FEET OF75(0 NORTH 20 FOOt OF Till BlOT 141.60 I’ERT tl-CtLAJlD DIBCRX000 P.O THE NORTH 90 FEET OFTill 500715 270 PEE? (EXCEPT THE W(iX-.3R-—rtE’fTI(ERE0F FA11tN01IIOOOLVENUl) OP TIlE WEST IJAIP (1/2)0)7 TIlt £01? HAlF )1j2L.OE-.L4(TRI)!RE11ELtCL_ER.L00iLAUSE)LflhIt151O$.r’SAN1IBM IECIIOWS 15 SINS 36,TOWN OP u53i0Ki7W3 OF THE TH160 PRINCIPAL llSRIDIAll,WCODIt’tl1R1i3X..,,jLLIHO1S.

/

‘.me-re L,ae ,,c’ nit ‘,ni3fl4 7. C FIrE alteC ,;1.(r ((((5ni niC 0tS€,t (nCr p &

________

- —4—- 4n tn. S9CtIftC F 2 e-n me Ineree.. 3 .ee

-

___________ _________________________

1 •I--- ‘rr le Hit

m--------,

‘1I/ / •1-

t”.n’W ti’R \G” -

Ttnee-e

I/r’.2e

Ln-e

U.r.t Fen’.c 0.40’ ItemPt

k

fa&n L,tn l55O Noirn,— Füt& IURH Hpr.

U,,.,, F1.,.c en Law,

a

:0-3

it >

g

- Fawn nm.

‘1,Jntn Fi 0(2 Eer

Po,,-..’r OP Br,c.’n,at.-J(

See(oi ___)___.__ (orb eq...). S...._ eeiOdertd by —Q--o-& ,_)oaAsa P,m.wCider neither

PCEO l3O

4 Aonteoe-rzpC,, (JO (C,1(i’

PC.O,’.(p t ‘G&it,, p00(

TOil PI(OFEI.910h01, SERVICE CORC0000 TO T1E COOlEST (t,L.ROISH1:.!009 ST.1,I)FRDS FOil I) UOUNIT.00 SURVEX

STIlE OF 1l,1160IS 3SR

11,1:1 OF COOK

0, 00061,0 4. BrAWLEr, ((00080 CERT1FT Till? THE ABOVEUESChIELIi PROpERTY 0(0.0 01100 DURVEUZU UNDER WY SUPERVISIONAN) TrIAT TOE Ph?.? 00050(5 DROWN 10 .0 000,0:1 REPF501NTATIOIIOF ShED SURVEY.Di)IEH510NS ARE SHOWN II) FEET AND 0001411. PARTS ‘EHOREOFAND 1(01 CORRECTED TO A TENPKISAT101 01 502 0008055i’AIIDENHEI?.

Ill P1,00850, ILLINOIS. •1_... 20QJ.

CL).ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LA1ll3UNVOEOR NO. 22S

LICENSE EIPIROS illiol 07.. ——

0P________

iW111. IQllHRLI.JSO3tR A9 4.L (2000 AV55V.l, illS. 1kI005l.Jl(O7.

I_air ri tiio,,c., C,i’Ueee.

‘-“I // 1’’N?.. -

r Cor,re Lent knce, i4I 501011.

1/ UL.meU1lHn’.-tzJ/IS7.O h)9’itR-& Li

hOC, CF ne 0 A7.?S AcInme

Urn LoaF OF nnt ,Jour.l ‘(a FEty OF T’(E ttefl4 2.10 FeETOF ‘ret azsrwrLr Gi Tee LOin ..e’.F. or Let S

142.0’

010313011109

JL_.

J•:

L

03011)11300100)lao003$rnIdol’0)00.40.0)—Ii01fl1000040.00—Il000-40000040.013001Ifi

0000040.0,—AlrOt0-4

LS11idid

Ioc9I/I]SflUIl11)10100

0000)01111)4III.,

Illil0’

00040)1)0011104.14!

4

III111I0041I 1100000111)004000311101100)1101100

Ill110010000I000IIJFI0007)0))

-----—------------

_____

fl.

—4)’19

11(11,11111III0,‘1

:))0010

0.

IC’?)1111110II?)1101

00)10130111

00000101130)100010—0110llIul

(11

AlI

fool

f,. 0

0411010.01010011,401

0101’)“11)03

411001.01110010101

/

.1

1)

III

4,

ll

0.

“‘.—011I01101010.19111,0410

0t1Ill1.01

r.

UI.__

II,

c,

‘33001-110)0

•.1110001.0‘110000110

O4*10101,b’IIOOUIIOIYI

I41.1OIl,fr’IlOVljlIJtVlIf’’

1511lf’IflIDflI1lS

1)11NHC;):O

1401111310*11,111110)9)0

I(I,

10111;Il,,I

IIIIIl0lINll,I’*oI’.OI

.INI,,.olIul;fll

3bI£

p

N’aD

DN

I1V

dJS

Od

Oei

Ow

1

:

/

______

C-:O

jL

1C

d

-

/

fl”

u.

>

I-I.

I

----

‘N-

-2-.

-

I

rnrnittee of the Whole Agenda Item #2

City of Des Plaines

-Community & Economic Development Department


ILLINOIS Des Plaines, IL 60016Tel: 847-391-5306Fax: 847-827-2196

MEMORANDUM

Date: June 24, 2010

To: Jason Slowinski, Actin ‘ity Manager -

From: Michael Conlan, Dir ctor )f Community & Economic Devc1opment

Subj: Conditional Use for Auto Sales 1855 E. Oakton Street

Issue: The owners of the Bully Auto repair business located at I 855 Oakton Street are seeking apermit to sell motor vehicles on the site as an accessory use to the auto repair operation. The sale ofmotor vehicles within the C-3 General Commercial zoning district requires a Conditional Use aswell as a major vadation if the lot size is less than 25,000 square feet.

Analysis: The Bully Auto repair business has operated at its current location at 1855 B. OaktonStreet since 1995. It unsuccessfully sought approval to add auto sales to its operation in 2004, andis currently applying for approval, based upon improvements to the cun-ent site plan. While theauto repair operation is permitted by right within the C-3 zoning district, the sale of motor vehiclesrequires a Conditional Use permit. The permit also requires a site of not less than 25,000 squarefeet unless a major variation is granted; the Bully Auto lot is approximately 14,271 square feet.

An important consideration is the impact on development density that the addition of auto saleswould have on the site. At present, there are spaces for 24 vehicles on site; that number would stayat 24 with the designation of spaces for vehicle sales. The development density would thereforeremain unchanged. The project does propose site improvements, however. The two current accessdriveways onto Oakton Street will be reduced to one, thereby reducing traffic conflicts; the 35’ wideaccess drive along Locust Street will be narrowed to 24’ in order to allow a larger landscape bufferon the residential street. The most significant improvement proposed is in site landscaping. Atpresent, the site presents a rather barren field of asphalt paving with very little visual relief. Theapplicant has proposed the installation of a 7-foot wide landscaped area with trees, shrubs and a 3-foot high ornamental wrought-iron style fence along the entire Oakton and Locust Street frontages.

At its meeting of May 25, 2010, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended, on a vote of 6-0, thatthe City Council deny the request for the Conditional Use with major variation. The Boardconsidered neighborhood opposition, which has been consistently present with the Bully Autooperation, with concerns related to ongoing property maintenance issues. The Commissioners’comments, however, centered around the lot area, which is roughly 43% below the standard set forauto sales lots, as the basis for denial.

I

Subsequently, the Community Development committee considered the Conditional Use request atits meeting of June 2’. At that time, tile committee heard from both the applicant and its attorney,as well as residents of the neighborhood. The representatives of Bully Auto stressed the level ofbeautification to the site that would result from project approvals. Neighbors cited years worth olproperty maintenance complaints about the property, ostensibly without improvements being made.Discussion among tile Aldermen focused on improvements that can he leveraged thi-ough theissuance of a Conditional Use permit, and whether tile Conditional Use can be revoked if tile

improvements are flot maintained. After deliberation, tile committee voted 2—I to approve tile

request for consideration by tile full Council.

Tile Community Development committee meeting yielded further questions, Ilowever, and staff wasasked to address the following:

u Is there a pattern of excessive property maintenance complaints at 1855 E. Oakton?Staff has researched the last 10 years of maintenance complaint records on this property:during tile past 1 0 years, there is a total of seven documented complaints, which is not aninordinate number of incidents. For the most part, the complaints seem warranted, but they

are also resolved in a timely fasilion, with compliance quickly achieved. The complete set

of records, including photographs, is attached.

D Is the proposed Conditional Use consistent with the recommendations of the OaktonStreet and Elmhurst Road Corridor Study? The Oakton Street plan calls for theeventual transition of auto-related uses, such as auto repair, new sales and gas stations, fromthe mixed-use corridor to more industrial or auto-centric areas of the city. This broadrecommendation refers to a change ill the basic laild use, however, and this is not

accomplished with tile addition of auto sales to the operation; rather, the auto sales are an

accessory use to the existing auto repair use. It is unlikely that tile basic land use of this

parcel will change in the foreseeable future. The proposed landscape improvement plan for

the site does achieve conformance with the design guidelines of the Oakton Street plan,

however, and it is this conformance that ilas been cited by staff.

D Are there precedents for the permitting of auto sales lots on parcels of less than 25,000square feet? During the committee meeting, representatives of Bully Auto provided

photos of three small auto sales operations within the community that have been allowed

despite having undersized lots. Upon investigation, staff found that the three businesses,

Des Plaines Auto Sale & Repair at 1685 Oakton; Family Motors of Des Plaines at 1322 LeeStreet; and Des Plaines Auto Works at 2010 S. River Road have approximate lot sizes of14,674 sq. ft., 8,749 sq. ft. and 16,756 sq. ft. respectively. All of the lots are undersized

when compared to the current code requirement of 25,000 square feet and iione of theseauto sales operations ilaS received a Conditional Use permit, as each was apparently

established prior to tile adoption of the 1998 ZOfllll code. Staff did find one additional auto

sales operation, the Cumberlaild Automotive Repair at 410 E. Northwest Higllway, that

received a Conditional Use permit for auto sales in conjunction with auto repair operations

on a 19,166 square foot lot on August 19, 2002.

The fundamental issue, therefore, is one with which the Council has dealt beftwe: whether the

incremental benefits derived from project—related improvements warrant a variation from

development standards, given that the status quo would generate no improvements, leaving the site

in its current state. The auto repair operation is permitted by right, and the City has no landscape

design standards that could be mandated by code in this situation. It is the requirement of the

Conditional Use permit that provides the City the leverage to mandate the landscaping

improvements along the Oakton and Locust Street frontages. If the permit is granted and the

mandated improvements are not maintained, the Conditional Use can be revoked. Such

improvements, however, as they are occurring on a case by case basis, have the efThct of enhancing

the aesthetics of commercial comdors on an incremental basis.

Recommendation: In light of the site improvements required as conditions of approval, it is

recommended that the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals be reversed and the

granting of a Conditional Use permit for auto sales in conjunction with auto repair, together with a

major variation allowing auto sales on a lot of less than 25,000 square feet, be approved by the CityCouncil.

AT’FACHMENI’S: Staff Report dated h/4/1OProperty Maintenance Complaint RecordsComparable Auto Sales Dealer PhotosResolution

City ofDes PlainesCornmunity & Economic Development Department‘sc) Division ofPlanning & Zoning

ES wEs 1420 Miner StreetILLINOIS Des Plaines, IL 60016

Tel: 847-391-5306Fax: 847-391-2196

STAFF REPORT

Date: June 4, 2010

To: Jason Slowinski, Acting City ManagerMichael Conlan, Director of Community & Economic Development

From: Scott Mangum, Senior Planner, Community &. Economic Development Department

Snbj: Conditional tlse Permit for operation of a motor vehicle sales operation, 1855 E.Oakton Street, Case # 10-0 17-CU


Issue: The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use Permit under Section 7.3-6-C and a majorvariation to Section 7.3-3 of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to authorizethe operation of a motor vehicles sales operation on lot of less than 25,000 square feet in the C-3District.

Analysis:Proposed Use Motor Vehicle Sales, in addition to existing Auto Service Repair

Petitioner Shankar (Sam) Patel, 1855 E. Oakton Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016

Owner Shankar (Sam) Patel, 1 855 E. Oakton Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016

Plan of Operation Operate a motor vehicles sales business with three employeesMonday-Friday: 8:00 am to 7:00 pm, Saturday 8:00 am to 5:00pm.

Existing Use Auto Service Repair

Surrounding Land Use North: Commercial RetailEast: Commercial RestaurantSouth: Single-Family ResidentialWest: Commercial Retail

of 5

Existing Zoning C--3, GcicraI Commercial

Surrounding Zoning North: C—3, General CommercialEast: C—3, General CommercialSouth: R- 1, Single Family ResidentialWest: C—3, General (‘onimercial

Street Classification Oakton Street is a Collector Street.

Comprehensive Plan The Plan recommends a Community Commercial use fir this site.

The applicant, Bully Auto, has applied br a Conditional Use Permit a major variation for MotorVehicle Sales on a lot of 14,271 square feet at I 855 F Oakton Street. The applicant currentlyoperates an Auto Service Repair facility at this location, which is permitted by right within theC-3 Zoning District.

Bully Auto submitted a similar request in 2004 that was denied by the City Council. Theapplicant has increased the amount of landscaping proposed foi the current request. Theapplicant has proposed site improvements by closing an existing driveway approach on OaktonStreet and adding a 7-foot wide landscaping area with shrubs, trees, and a 3-foot high ornamentalwrought-iron style fence around the Oakton Street and Locust Street frontages.

The zoning and current land use to the south of the subject property is single-family residential.An existing 6-foot high privacy fence and public alley separate the laud uses. To lessen theimpact on the residences to the south of the facility conditions of approval are recommended tolimit the hours of operation, location of repair activities, lighting, and potential odors.

The petitioner has submitted a traffic study prepared by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, and Aboona,Inc. (KLOA) and dated February 9, 2010. KLOA looked at the proposed reconfiguration of thesite by reducing curb cuts on Oakton Street from two to one and narrowing the existing curb cuton Locust Street from approximately 35 feet to 24 feet. KLOA concludes that the added trafficwill be negligible, on-site parking is adequate, and the access will be improved over the existingconditions.

Conditional Use Findings: As required by Section 3.4-5 (Standards fir Conditional Uses) of theZoning Ordinance, the proposed development is reviewed below:


Comment: Motor Vehicles Sales is a conditional use in C-3, General Commercial ZoningDistrict, as specified in Section 7.3 of the 1998 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, asamended.

of 5

B. rrIlc proposed conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the City’sComprehensive Plan;

cL1!’!f ike 2007 Comprehensive Plan recommends a Community Commercial use for thisxi to.

C. The proposed conditional usc is designed, constructed, operated and maintained to beharmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of thegeneral vicinity;

C’onimc’ni: The proposed Motor Vehicle Sales operation fronts on Oakton Street, a collectorstreet that currently has an auto-oriented chai-actcr in the area near Des Plaines River Road.Conditions of Al)prOVa I mcorpoi-ate landscaping and operational i-cquirements to lessen theimpact of operations.


Comment: With proposed conditions of approval relating to landscaping, noise, lighting, andhours of operation, none of the functions of the Motor Vehicle Sales operation are anticipated tobe hazardous or disturbing to the surrounding neighborhood.

E. The proposed conditional use is to be served adequately by essential public facilities andservices, such as highways, streets, police and lire protection, drainage structures, refusedisposal, water and sewer, and schools; or, agencies responsible for establishing theconditional use shall provide adequately any such services;

Gomment: After reviewing the petitioner’s plans, the proposed conditional use would be servedadequately by essential public facilities and would not overburden existing public services.


(o,nment: The proposed conditional use would appear to have adequate public facilities; itwould not create a burden on public facilities nor would it be a detriment to the economic wellbeing of the community.


of5C’omnwnt: With proposed Conditions of Approval, the proposed Motor Vehicle Sales operationis not anticipated to create additional traffic, noise, or odors that could be detrimental tosulToLindirig land uses.

H. rfJJe proposed conditional use provides vehicular access to the property designed so thatit does not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares;

Conimeni: According to the traffic study submitted, the proposed project is not anticipated togenerate an increase in traffic from the existing auto service repair operation, and thus will notnegatively affect current traffic conditions.

I. The proposed conditional use does not result in (lie destruction, loss, or damage ofnatural, scenic, or historic features of major importance;

C’ommenl: The proposed Motor Vehicle Sales operation would be located within an existingcommercial building. The proposed plan would not cause the destruction, loss, or damage of anynatural, scenic or historic features of major importance.


Comment: Other than the major variation request for Motor Vehicle Sales on a lot of less than25,00() square feet, it appears that the proposed conditional use complies with all additionalregulations within the Zoning Ordinance.

Recommendations: The Community I)eveloprnent Department recommends approval of theconditional use permit request for a Motor Vehicle Sales operation, based on review of theinformation presented by the applicant and the findings made above, as specified in Section 3.4-5(Standards for Conditional Uses) of the City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, subject to thefollowing Conditions of Approval:

1. Prior to issuance of the Conditional Use Permit, the applicant shall complete siteimprovements as indicated on the Site and Landscape Plans.

2. All landscaping materials shall be maintained in good condition so as to present a healthyand orderly appearance, and plant material not in this condition shall be replaced whennecessary and shall be kept free of refise and debris.

3. Hours of operation are limited to: Monday-Friday: 8:00 am to 7:00 pm, Saturday 8:00 amto 5:00 pm.

4. All repair of vehicles shall occur inside the building.5. Emission of noxious, objectionable or annoying odor in such quantities as to be

detectable at any point along a lot boundary is prohibited.6. All parking areas shall he surfaced and striped to meet all applicable I3uilding Code hard

surface requirements.

of 57. Prior to the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit, the applicant shall submit a

photometric plan that limits the maximum amount of horizontal foot—candles onrcsi(lcnhiaI properties to not more than 0. 1 toot—candles at the single—family residentialproperty I inc.

At its May 25, 2010 meeting, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended (6—0) that the CityCouncil (I(’ny the above—mentioned conditional usc permit for a motor vehicle sales facility in theC—3 zoning district. Under Section 3.4—4—C of [he Zoning Ordinance (Conditional Uses) the CityCouncil has the authority to approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny the above—mentioned conditional use permit.

Staff requests that this item be placed on the Committee of the Whole agenda at the June 21,2010 City Council meeting.

SM/sm

Attachments:

Attachment I : Petitioner’s Conditional Use and Variation Applications



Attachment 4: Trafiic Study dated February 9, 2010.

Attachment 5: Draft Minutes of the May 25, 2010 Zoning Board of Appeals HearingAttachment 6: Letter from Zoning Board of Appeals to the Mayor

Exhibits: Ordinance authorizing a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a MotorVehicles Sales facility at 1855 E. Oakton Street.

W/ Exhibit A: Plat of Survey prepared by Tice Survey Company, and dated June 18,1996.

W/ Exhibit B: Landscape and Site Plan prepared by Suher F Zummerwala andAssociates, and dated April 1, 2010.

ZONING VARIA TION APPLIGA TION— DO NOT WRITE IN THIS itRE1t

— FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

(A I l)Mii: DAt F IILH) D1D-o\1--

‘.1 i.i ‘/iiiIi!iU.U

I’ I IWil I I i’1 ‘I I j L’L ii A i ni ii LI

!ii:, ; !uienL br: L\vIi n:Lr 1] if!JliU [j :jt fiie, LI

A Vanaton to Section(s)

_______

of the. City of Des Plaines ZoningOrdinance (adopted 1 99), is requested in conformity with the powei-s vested in theZoning Administrator/Zoning Board of Appeals/City Council, to permit the Variation onthe property legally described as: (See legal description on Phil ol Survey supplied byapplicant) and commonly known as Des Plumes, CookCounty, Illinois. (subject property address)Variation being requested:

IJSEJ2 cAR SAL&

SHAPJlAftc911l”, 1’ItTL.Applicant(s) Name: S i nature

___________________

U7 ce Ce2e- —________

___

Tccphone: W -a-ç6 Fax: k1- 2ifceu: g47-ifr3I,Mailing Address: je-7 6&eeJVe4 i7e.$ Zt-

PL-eProperly Owner(s) Name:

. Signatiire. .

Telephone: i Fax: k1 s095M ai Ii iig Address: 6/

AttachmentIs the Contact Person the: Applicant or Owner

51 3

CJt4

(

_____________________

F0

0FFICEUSF0

L

id/Fipt uIl1vr: Aiiiount:

_______

Dat:

I ‘‘I bile i’iule llecn I) H

_____

pmli IIL’l n lIr iuiiji1 ‘I I ‘i

Ii ‘Iii (l IL. till) ‘I ji..,—

____________

II / () I’ i’ I iii t’,ccni I (LL C ii,’ II ill

r\ liiI 0/ 1’inin_’ ,\lniun i lru//(,liJl,j ‘Id of Ap1 ii if ,‘ o’iiLil

____________________—

REASONS ‘OR VARIA’rtoN lçfrUEr

lIt fete answeniig the follownig questions, rend the l”1oce to /\plicints helov’.

Notice t_Applicants

/ V;nialioii 5 II i.t uti ig nil fist cit wioch itenti its (hILneS 0 certain /Oiliiia,

ieqlIireIlienlS \.vtLere individual pi-operties ire itiHiufy hardened by the strict application ofhe zoning stuidiids. Ilic power to vary is esuicted and the degree oF varialion isi mi ted to the in in mu in chanrc necessary to overcome hardship of the property.

A Variation recognizes that the same zoning distric i-equircme.its do not affect allproperties equally the. intention of it is to allow changes to pi-operlies where is ahardship to entoy e lopptnmties with smulaly zoned propertiei Yojjuspfoveniking your case that special circumstances o unusual condwons afleçypoperty.These must rcsu[t in uncommon hardship and unequal treatment under the strictapplication of the Zoning Ordinance. Where hardship conditions cx lend to otherproperties, a variation cannot be granted. You must prove that the combination_fjiic

Zoning Ordinance and the uncommon co1di TiTjroperty prevents you fromö ouTid as_permitted uideTihe current zoninE chsthct.

No variation may be granted winch would adversely affect surrounding property or the —

general neighborhood. All variations must be in harniony with the intent and purpose ofthe Zonins, Ordinance.

in order for the Zoning Administrator, staff and Zoning Board of Appea’s tounderstand your reasons for requesting a variation(s) please answer the foBowingquestions compktely.

• What would you describe as the hardship(s) that prevent you from being able toearly out the strict letter of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance? (Explain inDetail) P,e9e& c 3e-c&,

k-xe, (eaeSbie5bepc-9

o€pe fr

c ttVsf1.

y aoIcLrq tLP5ct19 W ce xtc cø-iøie jx5 pit13-3 z-viqt iIe-’u ,ct tJ7

pt’y tP-o - ib o9: /c€-UoLI -115w)E’ .,7 e_3

-ep2I’Ye$ we Ic v . ??eea 1o :r,,e 11 5&117?5 /?L&ow rio the site conuitions prevent the reasonable use of your lani nude the

terms of the Zoning Ordinance? (Explain in Detail)

jk j,iice veqube5 a q-redWhdt W

Hwee w eo8k ZC

pte-t& t7 Yjc.7WL 7• f5 .r,jjiciei4 d?c? 2t t-ô pc-)-k

dcvd 6eLil ctth’$. #/6c2 &e tC1? qd5h.?P tc

cUe 1’ vin- b v zts t 7epc2iy - ji aLâ hcv

e e55 ,-t)i ye. ‘7,’

5ailf7 PP - ,? 5e-ii (ZLb’5 d L14 eI - — ..p I ‘‘ J-,, C.

• ‘v,

to ilic bust 1 “out knowieduc. Lao ;u afli rio that he pnstcai uonrhtion ot \‘‘ir

)10p’rly was 001 uteated by an action oi aayonu having papui1y iii L.sts in hr

anti titer the 7oning Ordinance of 1998 wax adopted. or as the rucull ol other

iuVclllIliufltai action, ui was cieated by natinat lorees:

8eca,QLe1 i gctic€ cd b ; mqy I?97

II to, ise exihin m dci l:

t2e 1 1

j fthe ie’ 3b c-4e y 71L253

fi ihe r/- s j-he ese-U cj

ei’nec1 cu2i,CcLeL J.1Lj 7?

frrce 13uey aILh (2L45

1 h.iiJ i,eI 17

l. 1-low would the denial of the vaiialion deprive you from rights enjoyed by other

persons subject to the same provisions’! (Explain in Detail)

di VTa Wifl pph.’e krwe. the’7e

he p,/?ezfI-ie5 I?/; y,ijie-y hcwe t€/-

ko ze’ Th€7 hcw Jic.e-?3 t 5e!

9zb f &9 hL9h hctd5hp

by jU5kdi bz iSBI7

k ab_/e

i- hc eo8i laz4 , jjp,eecee p1c1?

5. Is the requested variation the minimum measure of relief necessary to 111 ieviaiu the

alleged hardship or difficulty presented by the strict application of the Zonini

Ordinance2 (Explain in Detail)

Je- Uy Au m- BrtU1tO

// e-5Je1B1c&Jhop the. Icizfc&, icnd cczp &c

si ci 1 b&lcthsz3 p?P-9O* . 71v5 L5 17OTC-I £

tP’v *he eiye,.i?cie jmr th& th17

3et79 cc ue ca pr1, ZL7 Rztbbuo- t Ii7l511p help cikier e

/ eue,w1. prevdPY’

6 Will the granting of the variation he to harmony v ith the neighborhood and the

provisions of the Zoning Ordinance ft-mn which it is being sought? (Explain in

Detail) Ye;. (711tfl7p3 Lkt V1 WLtL 4 rn hm’7)’

with Rhe øaee, U$ C)t1 bu41i7 V16’u ct

No ie

kijga -n(be-i )OI tk i i

VC4 CA.s1QI /?Y i8 ø

a’1kI7 J1Ø’14oybocJ rii ,M, ,hede

eThey pe;7 bIll 1cbe a-id p&rd-42J

b5utJy u.k ;e/ b be ope b,11 1ci& 1t1

7 biit9S 4766P1?1.

e Frc’lay a2a/ i?”1 b pm. s,.trdc ‘;?o-b-?,,cI .bz&1i e5.s hc

Y tJ5Ltt

i\riir. 0! lioperiv J_5 ct_.1j’?(1 I !flU(, It Ol(

Iriylax NiiiiItr:”.- - 0 5 9L Z_ ø

(I loin taX bill or )WflShi1)OSSCS 5)iS uIhr)

A ppl icaiit ‘s iitei is! in the lot:i y: Xi sok Li sce 1 .1 (:000 act pin chaser

uthci (exptai 1):.

Pi(,(’nt 7iini if (t I cat Oil ol ProperlYl C—3 CoffLi ractL

(‘nrrent Usc ol Properly: - ——-. - .-. -

Pi oposcd Use ci Property: -

i’RUST INFORM AlION

Naiii() of ‘Trust Beneficiary (ies)

... -

A(lcl icss (es) of Trust Bcnebcimy (ies)1

All applications involving property held by a land trust must he signed by the trust

othccr ol the inSutulion holding the trust as the owner ol the l1operty. Ahhtionatly, the

trust beneficiary and his/her current address must be disclosed on this ftrm . The

application must also he accompanied by the following:

• A certified copy of the trust agreement.

• A letter from the trustee certifying [hat the beneficiary as shown on this

application is correct arid disclosing any beneficiary changes or lark

thereof during the 12 months preceding the filing of this applicaticii.

/i — —— -———

k .r [If you are fthng a LeeA reernent, please proceed to ge_8l

-5-

I hi vhv e’iti( y tI;at iII (ii th’ lIfl)/(’ St lelileflis and Uiüse coiiiained in ufly I p’s or

I;)PIs SIlI)fluItI((I I)CIt\\’it) ue lint’ In the hesL ol n\ kiowIedge nnd beliel.

JIltfl’iflI)Ie. I I’UNS(’fll It) the entry 11) Of the ))rC.fl)ISCS tlesenbed In tnt’

I)pIIe lion, by any iithoriz.ed oil icoil of the (‘ily o[ Des Plaines, br the. purpose of

f)OS(ifle, n linInlilIne, intf l(fliOViiH2, piII)Iic Iicirinr notiS as iflfl’ he rcctiiit(f, as well

is condurfinc xite analysis. -

(Sie:ialure of Appheant tn i\u[horicci J\gcnl) (J)alc)

__-

(Signature of C)wnci ) (DaLe)

8-

(( i835 ))DO NO m 1N TIIISAREII - FOR OFFICE 11SF ONLY

Oil (U-LQ.

A Conditional Use is requested in accordance with the City of Des Plaines Zoning

Ordinance as amended. to allow the:

on the property described by the attached legal description.

Alicant(s)NeSb0natureW

Felephj 31aFax:

Mailing Address: sbet_LPPie

Property Owner(s) Name: Signature

W 7245G Fax:

Mailing Address:19

Contact Person:: 97-5€

Fax: E-Mail: O? p jfcth4

Mailing Address:=

,\ hh , oI Prot)e t’: E Lc! 7? i)es I ames. l I 600 l

Po;ieri’’ iidix Uulllber: ——

—

(trom tax hill or lowaship assessor o(iUe)

Applicaiils iIlt(ieSE iii the )ropeoy: sole owncr lessee contract purchaser

jOtiicr(cpl;iin):

Pi cscot tonmh (‘lassilication of Property:

_____

Cuircot Use of Property:—

Proposed Use of Property: -

Bulk and Scale Evaluation (Please fill out completely):

TRUST INFORMATION

Name(s) of Tru$;t Beneficiary (ics)k

Address (cs) of Irust Beneficiary (ics)

* A applicatIons involving property held by a land trust must he signed by the trust

aifcer of the institution holding the trust as the owner of the property. Additionally, the

trust beneficiary and his/her current address must be disclosed on this form. The

application must also be accompanied by the following:

• A certified copy of the trust agreement.

• A letter from the trustee certii’ing that the beneficiary as shown on this

application is correct and disclosing any beneficiary changes or lack

thereof during the 12 months preceding the filing of this application

SadardsforCoditiona_Js

!hc /cnin floard of Appeals and the City Council review the pailicuini Facts and

ciicinnstnncCs of ach proposed Conditional Use in terms oF the fbI lowing standards.

I iccause of Ibis, please answer all questions in detni I. “Yes’ and “No’’ answers wit) no:

he acccptcd. and ii used, may delay your hearing.

A Is We proposed conditional usc, in Fact, a conditional usc established widiin

the spec.i [Ic zon ag district involved? (Please explain in detad)

y guLe there c’-e he 6-h

c pcJie.s, wh6 h5 6-tie

size iid.. cmpre js Beiy ac/. theV ‘‘

SeJLZ9 athS They hcwe bee --&ecL

p -Us permib- ctL Iie?se

13. Is the proposed conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the

City’s Comprehensive Plan and this Ordinance? (Please explain in detail)

eeBUyRdpfrL\’ ,i,’-be j

i h e

a7htcLW1-L Pt.i JJy cwPp Lkrr4h?1’vV€ tcbI’? d1-y 4-b 3rFe y

5cM tiI/ ieip 4ce 1E, pvdeic bye€ -(‘

C. Is the proposed conditional use designed, constructed. operated, and

maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the

existing or intended character of the general vicinity? (Please explain in

detail) hcwe 5mitbc

pku,.The ze-d eqrqcf’

t)// chct-a3e t-’he )eC,/ tL5& Pet

9e.U uth&9’ 1Lcic1 Re-C?, Lq Iszcç,

‘5iBuilct4Zi1 tocLil pLu1t af(

1k p7eT pj $S(y?(L c177ji3thcve 1c crn

‘l e hmo’iite tue vidif.y

D. Is the proposed conditional use is not hazardous or disturbing to existing

neighboring uses? (Please explain in detaill

Lect C’ fl1c-tmd

i’J PilZ1 F7t’i45 V‘ly

tI J2/A--9

E. Is the proposed conditional use to be served adequately by essential public

facilities and services such as highways, streets. police and fire protection,

drainage structures, refuse disposal, waste and sewer, and schools; or the persons

or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed conditional use shall

provide adequately any such services? (Please explain in detail)

Ye5 &a-L-& 8U7-

zt- ;t&xf-ere with pzt&1k i&y,eruCe±5

h&hoicy, 5reek, pejt Z7? sre&ic17

,q1’ 5ifdy 7cLjY5 €fA.’ilf be 3iiwed a,w/

•-• ‘-“i. Ple See e’z yh?b.L p1Q.’7

F. F)oes the proposed COfl(iit onI USC doeS create CXCCSSi e audit inflUl requrcnlCfliS

II pubbe expense hir publie ficilities anti services and not be dctrmental to th

eeononiic wet hire ni the cumnnudty’? (Please explaii in ietaii)

ec’-5_ L- p peby ppec?, i-P‘9’

tIc? PCIAftL Jqi5jCc rth

e X per)5 e. i&i/ / he pcticl JD/ Buty 42eb 71ier &,ill ‘

--rciJ /;cpubU 7 ciy 1Pe

77’t eied- hwct ethe

C. Does the pi-oposed conditional usc involve uses, activities, processes, materials.

equipment and conditions of operation that will be dculmental to any persons,

property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic,

noise. smoke. fumes, glare or odors? (Please expLain in detail)

aiU p>fr ic 9S tCe d

iU &P-’5-,

o/,- be -nø’5e,3e

rk b imfr 4 cth

Fci ee1ebi’p ljthkS4 i ijhk the5’

if. Does the proposed conditional use provide vehicular access to the property

designed that does not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public

thoroughfares? (Please explain in detail)

ee ujty ceto pmises- !crid he

c- ,-êsht4 Th 1°

zt 5&eeé- 6he7-o?

cy cess t vis/E

pa-IJ fe7 vi;-- c91O1 ,ipi)éI9 X?t1-

c-e cen’y ii efe7e77Ce wh O

I. Does the proposed conditional use result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a

natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance? (Please explain in detail)

&LU7,tLe •5 1q,?e t r’ipVe p7peby

Th db677 pc4wik, -càcL e-cue,ktep 977,

t- prope4y. E-nklie PTOPe-vby LL’i!/ teak Vey7?ie

ij ntebtiIz, er’n€9e &5 c ma-wrc&L, .certi, er;wazi ic,esse etj’-

-y LI6’1’? 6bt

J. Does the proposed conditional use comply with all additional regulations in this

Ordinance specific to the conditional use requested? (Please explain in detail)

eøy,pIy pith c c.pP!ic&1( 1ws

ri ce mi I:’/

--jL,;11 e 6-ic1y I1w&c Ai

ce’1 te’ iySfiic

Ø,jJ7cJU’e5 &/f’helP ePp1’y’?) w’i help ?

ç I, help kt,

“ -iby.

dry rertily that nU of the above statements and those contained in any papers or

plans ‘ohm iltcd hcre ili arc trite to the best of my knowledge and belief. burthcrrnore. I

UUCli to lie enir a or upon he premises described in the application, by any

all horii.cd •.flcial of the City of Des Platnes, lbr the purpose of p051mg: maintaining. ann

removing public hearing not;ces as may he required, and, as well as, conducting site

analysis.

___

____

L -1Io

__-

(Signature nt Applicant or Authorized Agent) (Date)

RemE5H PONETRR

J6_L

(Signature of Owner) R(Date)

LETTER OFA CKNOWL EDGEMENTFOR ZONING VARIATiON(S)

(‘i\S[ l”iIJi\4lJl?: I)Aii IIl .ll)

I )cat Niuu:I am in [lie uress ul let eslilig a Y.uiuiig Variation hum [lie (ily ui I )e Plaines. Rysigning this letter, you acknowledge thai you have received notice of the l)Rl)OSed\/ariatn)ii. Your si atuic does no indie Ic your support or oh1celion k) [lie

Ad(trcss or I ucation ot the. vim ation:

I )cseriptiun of the prOpOsed v nat ion(s): __.. _

This van ation case is scheduled for a public hearing he! ore the City of Dcx PIai nesZoning Roard of Appeals on: _ ______._., 7:30 P.M., City Hall,Room 102. The public is invited to at lend and he hear(l.

Adjacent Property Owners:

ñC 3. PP’($1’

Name (print)

;

____

Address

Signature

)1f /(\: / / _ ‘ o 6

q -iO

Dare

Name (punt)

___________________________

Address

I 9’l E: kkn & L. 6ci’

‘[hank You,

_J) C 7kYOwner of (lie Property

(-y//?(

Sign a (nrc Date

Signature Dale

-9-

BULLY AUTO CARE CENTER855 E. OAKTON ST,

1)[S PLAINES, EL. 60018847-824-5 866

April 12, 2010

___

BUSINESS PLAN

Ahoiiiiti liuiftly Aunt Ca ire Center:

Umia Gayatri, Inc. is an Illinois corporation d/h/a Bully Auto Care Center in Des Plaines.It also owns other business of Gas Station in the Wisconsin State and maintains excellentcredit history with all banks and creditors. Several banks have offered open credit lines to doAuto Sales busmess. All the partners have about 10 yrs. of experience in the automobile servicei ndustry

lianciah Data:

Bully Auto Sales will invest approximately $1, 50,000 with an extra credit line back up of$2, 50,000 to purchase nicest quality automobiles for sale.

The eost associated e ahLiishing Auto Sales inehule:

1. Office Remodeling.2. Bulding and Inventory of Used Cars.3. Operating Cost.4. Land Structure Re- surfacing, landscaping, lightning, sign and building paint work for betterappearance.5. Advertising.

Partners of Urniya Gayatri,lnc. are:

Shankar (Sam) Patellshwar (1K) PatelJayanti PatelAmrut PatelShailesh Patel

All the partners own their residence in Des Plaines.

M isson and (al Statement:Biifly auto care Ccnter’ goal is to provide quality, reliable and affordable automobiles for ourCustOmers. We are committed to c(>ntinuously imprOVe our business to meet our customer’s needand satisfaction. Shankar Patel and lshwar Paid will handle the operation of Auto Sales.

Bully Auto Safes is oeated at:1855 i.()akton Street Des Plaincs, IL. 60018

Operating Plan and Procedure:Bully Auto Sales will share the existing lot of Bully Auto Care Center. I’he display of vehiclesfor sale is submitted in our prolBssional architectural plan. A special I landicapped Parking,Visitor Parking and employees parking arc assigned in this plan. The landscape as required bycity is also on the plan. The office space of Bully auto care center will he divided toaccommodate Bully Auto Sales business.

Bully Au@ Sales will provide employment:Once the sizeable inventory of used cars is displayed, Bully Auto Sa.les will provide anemployment to two to three persons to conduct the auto sales business.Mr.Ramesh Punatar with15 plus years of auto sales and financing experience will join with us as a Sales Manager.

Bull Auto Safes will help in Economic Growth of neighborhood sinesses in Des Plaines:Bully Auto Sales business will support and contribute economical growth to the neighborhoodbusinesses in Des Plaines. Local business such as Bank, who will finance our autos toconsumers. Auto Sales will help to Gas Stations, Auto Part Stores, Print shop, local news papers,Restaurants and many other businesses in l)es Plaines.

Bully Auto Sales will contribute Signiticant Tax Revenue to City of Des Plaines:Bully Auto Sales is projecting estimated sale of$1 .5 miNion and will collect about 8% ofRevenue sales tax and Use Tax. A portion of this tax will benefit City of Des Plaines and itsresidents.

Hours of Operation:Monday — Friday 8:00 AM — 7:00PMSaturday 8:00AM — 5:00 PM SUNDAY — CLOSED

Conclusion and Request:Our request is to allow changes to our property because of the economical hardship to continueour business and enjoy equal opportunities with similarly zoned properties in the City of DesPlaines where Auto Sale permits are granted to others even though they have smaller land andbuildings compare to our location. Only Auto repair business is not sufficient to maintain ourbusiness expenses and our living. Adding Auto Sales will help us to survive and maintain ourbusiness in this bad economy.

z4&6eJeJShankar (Sam) PatelBully Auto Care Center, Des Plaines.

Attachment 2, Location Map - 1855 E Oakton Street

iw:1

c.

Prepared by Communfty and Economic Development Department: SM, May 17, 2010

Att

achm

ent

3

*E

Oak

ton

Str

eet

1855

EO

akto

nS

tree

t

1855

EO

akto

nS

tree

t1

VC

.-

KLOA(‘i ‘H t ‘ •, 4 L ,,,i;.

II I liii jI I liii I I ill

.1 1 ‘‘‘liii

IVIFM( )RANI)UM To: Sam PaidBully Auto (‘are (enter

FROM: Javier MillanMichael A. Wcrlliiiiaiiii, P1 , P’I( )l

I )ATI February 9, 2010

St.JBJFCT: Traffic and Parking EvaluationBully Auto Care CenterDes Plaincs, lllinos

This memorandum presents the results of a traffic evaluation conducted by Kenig, Lindgren,O’l-lara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the provision to sell used cars at the existingBully Auto Care Center in Des Plaines, Illinois. The site, which is currently an auto repair shop,is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Oakton Street with Locust Street.As proposed, the existing site will be reconfigured to reduce the number of access drives onOakton Street from two to one, reduce the width of the existing access drive on Locust Street andreconfigure the parking area to provide better internal circulation and more parking spaces toaccommodate the proposed addition of used car sales.

The specific task of this evaluation was to (1) estimate the traffic to he generated by the proposedused car sales, (2) review the proposed access and circulation system serving the site, and(3) assess the parking needs of the proposed facility.

Trip Generation Estimates

The peak hour traffic that will be generated by the proposed used car sales was estimated based onrates obtained from the Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition, published by the Institute ofTransportation Engineers (ITE). It should be noted that the auto repair shop and the used car saleswill have three employees and will be open from 8:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Monday through Fridayand from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Saturdays. Given that ITE does not have trip generation for aused car sales center, KLOA, Inc. used the new car sales center land use as it also includes usedcar sales. Table 1 shows the morning and evening peak hour traffic projected to be generated bythe addition of the used car sales.

Table 1ESTIMATED CoMMERCIAL GENERATED TRAFFIC REDUCTION

Weekday AM. Peak

________

OutLand Use Size In

Used Car Sales Three Employees 1 1 1 2

Weekday_P.M. Peakin Out

Attachmenti<.t.)ik, Itic. I II) .Ii’ .4. hI .4 II4.’ ‘il; II II’ ‘I L!It. I)

l’rom Tabic I it can be seen that the proposed used car sales is estimated to genel-ate a very lowvolume of Irafhc during (lie weekday morning and evening commuter peak hours when the trafficon the external roadway system is at its highest levels. The proposed used car sales is projected togenerate between two to three additional trips during the peak hours which averages to one tripevery twenty minutes. As such, it can be seen that the proposed used car sales will have a verylimited impact on the operations of the existing roadway System.

Access and Circnlaion Review

Access to the site is currently provided via two ful.l ingress/egress access drives on Oakton Streetand one 35 Ibot wide full ingress/egress access drive on Locust Street. Under the proposed plans,the two access drives on Oakton Street will be consolidated into one full ingi-ess/egress access drivelocated at the cast end of the site and the wide access drive off Locust Street will be narrowed toapproximately 24 feet providing adequate width for a full ingress/egress access drive. Both accessdrives will provide a two—lane cross—section with one inbound lane and one outbound laie withoutbound movements under stop sign control. The access drive system as proposed will provideefficient and orderly accessibility to the site and will be an improvement over existing conditions byreducing the number of conflict points within close proximity on Oakton Street and by reducing thewide access drive on Locust Street.

Parking vahiation

As proposed, the facility is to contain a total of 26 parking spaces. The parking spaces are plannedto be allocated as Ibllows: six spaces for visitors and employees, five spaces for the auto care centerand 1 5 spaces for the used car sales. Based on the proposed operation and observations at theexisting facility, the proposed parking supply will be sufficient to accommodate the pealc parkingdemand of the auto care center and the used car sales.

Conclusion

It is our professional opinion, based on our observations and a review of the site plan, that theadditional traffic resulting from the provision of used car sales will have negligible impact on theadjacent roadways. The proposed access system will be an improvement over existing conditionsand will provide efficient accessibility to the site. The proposed number of parking spaces will beadequate to accommodate the parking demand of the existing auto care center and the proposedused car sales.

Paid 13u I ly Auto Care Center n Des Pin lies F chi ant y 9 2) (I Jo

2

_

CITY OF DES PLAINES

1420 Miner I Northwest highway k Des Plaines, Illinois 60016 —4498 ‘ ( 847) 391 — 5300

June 4, 2010

Mayor Moylan and Des Plaines City CouncilCITY OF 1)liS PLAINHS

Suhcct: Zoning Board of Appeals Case II 10-01 7-CU, 1855 B. Oakton StreetRE: Request to authorize a motor vehicle sales operation

honorable Mayor and Members of the Des Plaines City Council:

The Zoning Board of Appeals met on May 25, 2010 to consider the above petition. The Zoning Board ofAppeals submits the following:

I Mr. Sliankar (Sam) Patch, Mr. Ramesh Punatar, petitioners, and Mr. Barry Collins, representativefor the petitioner presented the pertinent facts.

2. Four members of the public testified about the request.

3. Written information was presented to the Board Members by a member of the public.

4. The Community I)evelopment Department recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permitand major variation, subject to conditions.

5. l’he Zoning Board of Appeals recommended (6-0) to deny the Conditional Use Pennit and majorvariation for a motor vehicle sales operation on a lot of less than 25,000 square feet.


Aniie SeegersDes Plaines Zoning Board of Appeals, Chairman

cc: City OfficialsAldermenZoning Board of Appeals CommissionersPetitionersRecording SecretaryFile

Ai tcchmenf

PLAT OF SURVEY1312 N. HoIMAN AVtNIJI.

PARK RIOGE. ILLINOtS 6006a

kU)

-1

TfCE SURVEY CO.

PHONE: S23-5947

Dilancas .ro marked n fail anddocim.)i parts theroef

Order No

Sc.jn I inch

Dale

Owns,.. ___._. .___...._.__........._

Ordered by

State of illinoisCounty of Cook

I. JON P. rICE, a Rig. Ill. Land Surveyor, do

hereby certify that I have located the building on

tha above property. -

I

Rag. Ill. Land 5uj.yor

Compare alLjIa(nts b.frne building huy jima and

at onc. report any diIL.r.nc..

Refer fo deed 01 abatiact for building restiidion.

U. Order Number her all future reference

Se.ey not aGeRAISED .wboRr.d r.A

Sorr° pop.hog n.n.

State of IllinoisCounty of Cook

I. JON P. TICE, a Rag. Hf. Land Surveyor.

hereby certify that hav, surveyed the abe

d.sc,Ibgd property find that the put haroon dras

is a correct representation of said rurv.y correct

to a temperature of .68° Falrrenhn,it.

(1 .Z /.c.RA. Ill. Lied 5err No. 1105

/

iON P tilEItEGIflERtO ILLINOIS LAND SURVEYOR

Lot. 17 ( eucirept thir Rent 10 feet thereof) enhi oil or Loto til, 1l, 2.) inn

Er, libel) iii Vl,1trr’,, Steel Cit litton, a anl,,ilvlnlon of tire Horthecort

of tint Rortuuveni. quarter of Sectl,e, 211, To.’nbip In) North, Paine Si? Rent.

Thtrol Prineipil HerlilIron, In Coot Crouxlty, lUlnola.

ES

21

.JUarl.cr

of’ l.he

(I)

Igi ;-7, 3i .Gi- /r,/

2/

SI.

‘I

czv,v

t i’rr’J ./ t:;Iw? 4’

PLAT OF SURVEY1312 N HO[1MN AVENIJF

PARR RIbGE. IWNOIS 60068

kU)

TICE SURVEY Co

PHONE. BThSc’47

Distances are marked in feat and

ducirnl pads th.,ooi

Order He _L5_

I inch

Dab

Owner

Ordered by

Stat. of Illinois ‘

County of C00kf

I, ION P. T(CE. a Rag. Ill. Land Surveyor, do

hereby certify that I hav, located the hrutthng on

the above property. ,i -

-—_______

Rag lit. Land 5uja.yur

Conipere alL pnts before building by sam. end

—at onc. report any diltar.nc.,

Rat., to deed or abstrad for building ri.ntrctions, Sanav fbi ballS IbloI

RAISES) .eAow.d iAI aS

lisa Order Nunib.r for all future relarence sos’qa pr.p..eg a,.

State of Illinois LCounty of Cook j

I, JON P. TICE. a Rug. III. Land Surveyor. d

hereby c.rtify that I hey, surveyed the abos

d.scribaid property and that the plat h.reon draw

is a corrd repres.ntation of ,.aid survey corned,

to a temperature of 8 Fahrtnnh.it

III. Land 5un’r Ne. 1705

IvJON P lICE

REGISTERED ILLINOIS LAND SURVEYOR

1.01. Uj ( except ttir Gnat 1o rn,,,t therecir and ,ij at Lots 1’1, 19, 2q and ?1

In RIoch S in Wbitnn Steel Car Adititlois, is aublInloton or thn ttorthe.at quarter

or the No thweat quarter of Section c1, Touubji 1.j North, tIane U’ Gnat of the

Third Principal I4eridlnn, irs Conic County, IUiicoUa.

E

(I)

S

OA K TO/V57

k(1)

/4’.;’ 7, -a’s 4, ç/

to

tli

ci

EXHIBIT

? sc.yco//r.- .t.rn,ci .1 sr;, ‘

NORTH SITE PLAN

.1

c)

•

OAKTON STREET

EXISTINTiIO’x16’I2HPOLE SION

PROJECT DATATOTAL PROPERlY ARIA 14,271.39 SF

USE GROUP— sERvIcE RETAIL

EXISTING IIUILDINC, FLOUR AREA— 1197 SI

PARKING REGUIRUI)

PARKING I’RUVIIILD 24INCLUDING I H/C

H

HC/)

HC/)

0C

HANrnCAP PARKINGVISITORS PARKIND 2EMPLOYEE PARKIN[3 2AUW CARE PARKING 5AUTO SALES PARKING 14

TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 24

011£ONUR)TESHELL STOPS

*1(15...

-16!-

OAKTON s’rRRET

1 1 5. 0 0’PROPERTY LINE

NORTH

LOCATION PLAN

____

15 FT PUBLIC ALLEY

NO SCALE

20 0 40 60

Scale 1“

1Q’DESIGN FIRM LW. NO. 184.00440?

IRLE LIGHT

ThCAF

EEL STOPS ‘//l// /EXISTING / /óF

?AT PEAR

___ __

• .1

EXISTINGGATE

\ PtLDPERTY LINE

115.00’‘ IXIS1ING FENCE

TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 14,271.39 SF

15 FT PUBLIC ALLEY

2OO

INTERIOR LANSCAPE AREA REQUIRED14,271.39 SF x I5Z 214! SFAREA PROVIDED = 2315 SF

= 10’

NOTE ONLY LOW LYING ShRUBS, GRASSES AND PERENNIALS THAT WILL NUT EXCEL!)30 IN HEIGHT AT MATURITY MUST DC PLANTED ON PARKING LOT ISLANDS.

SHRUBS THAT OBTAIN A NATURE HEIGHT GREATER THAN 1’ SHALL ITtMAINTAINED AT A HEIGHT OF NOT LESS THAN 4’,

ALL PLANTS, GRASS, GROUND COVER AND TREESTO MEET ANSI 760.!, ‘AMERICAN STANDARD FUR NURSERY SI[ICK’.

I. ALL PLANTING MATERIALS SHALL BE BOTANICALLY EONF’AIIBLE WITH EXISTINGDR PROPOSED MATERIALS ANTI SHALL NOT HAVE CHARILC1 lINT! IC DETRIMENTALTO THE PUBLIC WELFARE. SUCH AS SUSCEPTIBILITY TO ITISLASE AND WIND DAHALLOR A TENDENCY TO INTERFERE WITH UTILITIES [IN PUBLIC NIGHT OF WAYS.2. ALL DECIDOUS TREES SHALL BE MIN 2 1/2’ CALIPER AT PU ANLING.3. ALL EVERGREEN TREES SHALL TIE MIN 6’ HEIGHT AT PLANTING.4. ALL PERIMETER SHRUBS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF lIP IN [LLIC,Ih1 AT PLANTING. ALLOTHER SHRUBS TO BE MINIMUM 311’.5. SPREADING SHRUBS SHALL BE MINIMUM OF 16’ IN DIAMETER Al PLANTING.6. ALL MATERIALS SHALL lIE OF NURSERY STOCK.I, ALL LANDSCAPING WORK SHALL MEET CITY OF lIES PI.AINS LANDSCAPE ORDINANCEAND REQUIREMENTS,B, TI-IC MINIHUI4 SIZE OF ALL SHRUBS AT THE TIME [IT TI ANTING SHALL BE 24’.9. INSTALL MULCH AT ALL REMAINING LANDSCAPE AREAS WHERE SOD IS NOT INSTALLED.10. MULCH TO BE FROM SHREDDED HARDWOOD GNLV.

zags

NEW OAKTON STREETCCRETE C1NIS 3’ HIGH ME TAL FLNCE

CONCRETE COOLLY

__ __

— —

Al I lNI)N

TL

fNI ‘.1 CRABAPPLE AUTO SAl ITS PEG PTh,t LIL,H1IT)N[;RLTE CURIIS

I \NEw

I —- ASPHALTAUTO CARE PEG

‘“-BURNJI’Ll PUSHHICK’S YEW

rRaPEG

VISI’I’ORPEG

fl iII

I:QNcIITE IIVU-TEll STOUT

IDII

CU—1

I

If)

c.

H

U

3’ HIGH METAL

BURNING BUSHHICK’S YEW “

5,-

EXISTINGMAPLE TREE

ENCE

I

I. INILEN

0.

0

4.

1.

EXISTINGClInT LIGHTS

VISITORPICG

ii

___________-J

PLANT SCHEDULE

AUTO SALES PEG

SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL

RMMOCM. Malt cI,.O4 Halt flUE

a a.,.’

IAMaI’flX - 6’ H

—MaIIIDCMOT MTUTERAT PEM 6’ I

IIIDI’ YEV RI’

EallInMal M,ATL —

TIIIRTETI..

FlUE [jIlt

NORTHLANDSCAPE PLAN

40 60

.5’co/e 1TREE PLANTING DETAILOTT

DESIGN FIRM TIC. NO. 184.004407

H

OA

KT

ON

ST

RE

ET

HU

JLY

AFT

OL.

1

SA

LE

S&

FN

VIC

FI

FLO

_AK

TO

\S

’1i

11i’

TiE

SP

LA

INS

,T

LL

II\[OH

—

I

-..‘“

___

I.

II-1I,

15FT

NH

LT(\L

LE

Y

EXH1W

iih’r

Vtc

\uiaI

[:•

—i’

&E

RV

l’

iij:.5

iTI’

TR

1.

‘‘Iij

5sS

I

Sss,

‘,rwIi

—•__,-_

ILS

€‘Ii

____-1

’7,

Case /11 0—003—CU — 1141 Lee Street (eontd)C’ase 1/10-01 7-C’U - I 855 E. Oaklon StreetCase //10-01 8-CL’ - 480 Poller RoadCase 1/10-015-V - 1415 I lenry AvenueCase 1110-012-CU - 110$ Lee StreetMay 25. 2010Page 6

Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton

Request: A Conditional Use Permit under Section 7.3-6-C and a major Variation to Section 7.3-3 ofthe 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to authorize the operation of a motorvehicles sales operation on a lot of less thami 25,000 square feet in the C—3 District.

Attorney Barry Collins, 733 Lee Street, Des Plaines, Illinois: applicant Mr. Shankar (Sam) Patel and the owner ofthe property, Rainesh Punitar, were sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Mr. Collins stated Bully Auto Care has been repairing automobiles at the present location for 10 years. Mr. Collinsstated the current owner of the business wishes to branch out into auto sales. Mr. Collins stated the addition of autosales would not impact traffic. Mr. Collins added one ingress/egress on Oakton Street would be closed but theexisting ingress/egress on Locust would remain. Mr. Collins stated the parking would be expanded to accommodate24 vehicles with one handicapped reserved space. Mr. Collins stated a landscape plan had been submitted.Mr. Collins noted additional sod would be added to the east. Mr. Collins stated a fence that separates his client’sproperly from the residential area south currently exists and added the alley provides a natural barrier. Mr. Collinsstated his client expects to have eight vehicles for sale at any given time. Mr. Collins stated normally there are twoemployees on site at a time — Mr. Patel and his brother. Mr. Collins stated the addition of auto sales would add oneperson, Mr. Punitar, who has an extensive sales background.

Mr. Collins stated he and his clients were present to assist in answering any questions the Board may have.

Chairman Scegers inquired as to whether the building would be improved. Mr. Collins stated no changes to thebuilding were planned that changes only to parking and the landscape area are proposed. Mr. Collins stated hebelieves the Board had been provided photos of the current conditions [on the site]. Mr. Collins stated his clientshave agreed to the 7-foot setback and addition of vegetation, as recommended by Staff.

Mr. Collins inquired as to whether a copy of the traffic study had also been provided to the Board. Mr. Mangumconfirmed it had. Mr. Collins noted the traffic study, conducted by KLOA, concluded the proposed auto saleswould have no measurable impact to traffic on either of the two streets that abut the property.

Chairman Seegers confirmed landscaping was proposed along Locust and Oakton. Mr. Collins confirmed that wascorrect. Chairman Seegers confirmed (he area adjacent to the east side of the building would be improved with sodand that no vehicles would be parked in that area. Mr. Collins confirmed that was correct. Mr. Collins corrected hisearlier testimony to state that lighting may be the only improvement made to the building. Mr. Collins stated hisclient agreed to hire the necessary lighting engineers to determine the amount of light that would be sufficient forsecurity. Mr. Collins added that if any lighting were added, that it would be directed toward Oakton and not theresidential area and would conform to Staff’s recommendations. Mr. Collins stated hours of business operation asMonday through Friday until 7pm.

Mr. Hofherr inquired as to whether yesterday was indicative of a typical business day. Mr. Punitar stated yesterdaywas an exceptional day as a result of providing parking to the neighboring restaurant who had a large crowd. Mr.Collins stated, because his client has no need for the additional space, some patrons of the restaurant park 5 to 7 cars

on his client’s lot. Mr. Collins stated the restaurant uses more spaces in the evening but added that would ceasewhen auto sales commence.

Mr. Porada confirmed the maximum number of employees to be four. Mr. Collins stated that was correct. Mr.Porada inquired as to whether all drive. Mr. Collins stated the third person is Mr. Patel’s brother who lives twoblocks from Mr. Patel and that they car pool when both are working.

Mr. Porada inquired as to how many vehicles are repaired on a typical day. Mr. Collins stated four, but added that ifa customer does not pickup his/her vehicle promptly that it could be on the lot for an additional day or so. Mr.

Attachment

Case /110-003-CU - 1141 Lee Strcet (cont’d)Case 1/10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase //10-01 8-CU - 480 Potter RoadCase ttlO-015-V - 1415 henry AvenueCase fl10012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 7

Porada inquired as to how many vehicles were planned for sale. Mr. Collins stated that the matter had beenapproached with a total number of vehicles on the lot without any designation as to the quantity for sale and thequantity for repair because the mix could constantly be changing. Mr. Porada inquired as to the number shown onthe site plan. Mr. Collins stated the site plan had been drawn to illustrate the total number available and withoutparking on Locust. Mr. Collins added that a finite amount of parking exists. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether thepetitioner was amenable to a maximum number of vehicles for sale. Mr. Collins stated his client would not beamenable to a number for sale, per se, but amenable to a maximum total number on premises of 24. Mr. Collinsstated he did not feel there is any purpose served by limiting the number of repair or sales vehicles and that doing sowould prevent his client from adapting to the demand. Mr. Porada confirmed the petitioner already operates an autoservice repair facility. Mr. Collins confirmed that was correct. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether that had beengranted previously by the Board. Mr. Mangurn stated the auto repair is permitted by right in the Zoning District.Mr. Porada concluded that the petitioner could have an auto service facility for up to 24 cars by matter of right. Mr.Collins stated, conceivably, if the lot were expanded to accommodate 24 vehicles. Mr. Porada noted that there wasno recourse over the auto repair operation but that because sales were not a matter of right, that sales was the onlyaspect of the business to which a Condition would be attached. Mr. Porada encouraged his colleagues to considerlimiting the number of autos for sale.

Mr. Porada inquired as to whether there was currently any on-street parking. Mr. Collins stated there was not. Mr.Porada confirmed that there was a commercial building located to the west and residential to the south. Mr. Collinsconfirmed that was correct and reiterated the residential properties to the south were separated by the alley. Mr.Porada inquired as to whether a landscape buffer was proposed along the alley. Mr. Collins stated nothing wasplanned beyond the fence. Mr. Porada confirmed the solid fence immediately to the south is 6-feet in height. Mr.Collins confirmed that was correct. Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether the fence was set back from theproperty line. Mr. Collins stated it appears to be set back approximately 4-feet.

Mr. Catalano inquired as to whether the security lights would be illuminated all night. Mr. Collins stated heexpected that would be the case. Mr. Catalano inquired as to the placement of the building lights. Mr. Collins statedhe was uncertain as to whether building lights would be added, but amended his original statement with regard tochanges to the building in the event that would be the case. Mr. Catalano inquired as to the pole light shown on thewest side of the property and another on an island at the entrance. Mr. Collins stated he was unaware of pole lightsbut added the person who drew the plan was likely aware of the proper placement of the lights.

Mr. Porada inquired as to the rationale of assigning parking in that fashion during evening hours. Mr. Collins statedhe would check with his client. Mr. Porada inquired as to the existing lighting. Mr. Collins stated there is currentlya flood light on top of the building on Oakton. Mr. Catalano confirmed the light is on all night. Mr. Punitarconfirmed it is. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the light is attached to the roof of the building. Mr. Punitarconfirmed it is. Mr. Porada concluded the lighting is used to detour vandalism. Mr. Porada expressed he did not seeany reason why repaired and new vehicles could not be moved to the spaces along Oakton in the evenings toeliminate any intrusion on the neighbors to the south. Mr. Porada added doing so would also eliminate the need forlighting directed to the south. Mr. Collins stated that would assume all the spaces along Oakton were vacant. Mr.Collins added Building Code requires parking lots he illuminated and that even office buildings are lit at night. Mr.Mangum stated light is not permitted to trespass onto the single-family residential properties across the alley. Mr.Collins stated his client would comply with that Ordinance requirement. Mr. Saletnik noted it is not the ZBA’spurview to determine the lighting detail or how a business should be operated. Mr. Saletnik added the petitioner hasa right to illuminate his property for security purposes and that purpose of the performance standards is to providesuch protections. Mr. Mangum stated his agreement. Mr. Porada stated his opinion that attaching reasonableConditions is the proper course. Mr. Collins reiterated his client is willing to comply with Code. Chairman Seegersstated the Board’s interest in working out issues in the best interest of all parties.

Citing the petitioner, as well as some of the members of the audience, as familiar, Mr. Saletnik inquired as towhether this matter had been before the ZBA previously. Mr. Mangumn confirmed the petitioner appeared before theZBA in 2004 and that the request had been subsequently rejected by the City Council.

Case /110-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case //10-01 7-CU - 1855 F. Oakton StreetCase //10-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase 1110-015-V - 1415 henry AvenueCase //10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 8

Chairman Seegers called for the Staff Report to he read by Mr. Marigum.

Staff Report:

Chairman Seegers called fhr questions or comments by members of the audience, either in fhvor otor in objection tothe proposal.

Ms. Linda Caruth, 1868 I3ennctt, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Ms. Caruth stated she had documents, a petition and photographs to present. Ms. Caruth stated the documentsincluded copies of the Ordinances and a history of how many times Bully Auto had appeared before the ZBA for thesame reason and each outcome. Chairman Seegers asked how many times Bully Auto had appeared. Ms. Caruthstated Bully Auto has appeared before andlor requested Continuances from the ZBA and/or City Council 18 times.Chairman Seegers inquired as to the significance of item(s) highlighted. Ms. Carutli stated the highlighted item(s)are the City Ordinances and violations cited over the years and not addressed by the Department, Community andEconomic Development.

Chairman Seegers confirmed the third page was a copy of the petition. Ms. Caruth stated the petition includes thenames and signatures of 160 persons oposed to allowing Bully Auto to become a used car lot. Chairman Seegersnoted the date on the petition is June 25”. Ms. Caruth stated that was an error- that the date should be May 25ih

Chairman Seegers stated the ZBA is considering only the current case, not proposals since 1997. Ms. Caruth statedher understanding. Ms. Caruth reiterated all other proposals, with the exception of one in which approval wasrecommended by a company called Land Strategies who had developed that particular Staff Report, had been deniedby both the ZBA and City Council. Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether the signatures had been obtained fromthe immediate area. Ms. Caruth stated the signatures had been obtained throughout the entire City. ChairmanSeegers stated he was unable to accept the petitions because the date was incorrect and also because past cases couldnot be considered. Chairman Seegers stated the petitions would be recognized, but not accepted as exhibits.

Chairman Seegers accepted the highlighted list as Exhibit A and the previous rulings, Exhibit B.

Ms. Caruth asked if she could present photographs to the Board. Chairman Seegers stated, if the photographs wouldnot become part of the record, the photographs could be referred to.

Ms. Caruth stated, since 1997, she has been the primary person objecting to the Conditional Use and Variationsrequested at 1855 Oakton. Ms. Caruth stated she lives a little to the east and directly behind Bully Auto. Ms.Caruth stated Bully Auto is not a good neighbor and has never been. Ms. Caruth stated repeated complaints havebeen filed with regard to the upkeep of the property. Ms. Caruth stated the 1997 photos show conditions identical tothose current. Ms. Caruth stated Bully Auto last appeared before the ZBA in August, 2004, and City Council,October, 2004, and that each denied the request.

Ms. Caruth stated a used car lot requires property 25,000 square feet in size and that Bully Auto’s property is only14,277 square feet.

Ms. Caruth stated both her property and Bully Auto’s property are located in an AE100 year flood plain. Ms. Caruthstated, as a result, she is unable to improve her property and asked why Bully Auto is allowed to expand theirs.

Ms. Caruth read a report prepared by Doug Hammel of Cammiros Ltd., with regard to the mixed use plan for theOakton Street corridor. Ms. Caruth stated the report indicated auto related uses should be minimized. Ms. Caruthread, “many related uses such as auto repair, new sales and gas stations can negatively impact commercial corridorsby requiring excessive means of automobile access and parking, creating environmental impacts on noise and airquality and compromising the aesthetic theme of the corridor. As specific opportunities arise, such uses should be

Case 1110-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case //10-01 7-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetC’asc //10—01 8—CU — 480 Potter RoadCase //10-0l5-V - 1415 henry AvenueCase //10-012-CU - 110$ Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 9

relocated to more industrial or auto oriented location in the City.” Ms. Caruth stated Community Development hadtold her the plan fits the plan for the Oakton corridor. Ms. Caruth stated it clearly does not.

Ms. Caruth stated there were 23 cars on the lot yesterday and that although the owner stated he allowed CuzzinsRestaurant to park on his lot, that the restaurant displays a sign that indicates parking is available at Bully Auto after6 PM.

Ms. Caruth stated that, in 2004, the petitioner had clearly stated to the ZBA that he had already graded the propertyin preparation of landscaping, but after being denied, poured concrete within a flood plain, which she assumes wasdone without a permit. Ms. Caruth stated she was unable to obtain the documents from the City under her Freedomof Information Act (FOIA) request.

Ms. Caruth asked whether the Board wished to see the photographs. Chairman Seegers replied, no, thank you.

Ms. Caruth stated the Building Code Department does not always physically inspect the site when complaints arefiled. Ms. Caruth stated tires are stored behind the building and milk gallons containing oil by the dumpster. Ms.Caruth stated Mike Spiel was sent out to check two containers of used fluids in the alley behind the fence, but by thetime he arrived, the containers had been removed.

Ms. Canith stated the paint on the building is peeling. Ms. Canith stated the 5-foot required setback from the alleyis actually about 3-feet. Ms. Caruth stated when the lawn is mowed, all the garage on the property ends up on hers,which violates the new C)rdinance.

Ms. Michele Cederquist, 365 Graceland, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case. Ms.Cederquist read a prepared letter as follows: “I have lived in DP for nearly 30 years, first on Bennett Place then onCraig Drive. Now I am currently a couple of blocks away, on Graceland. I can vaguely remember when thislocation was a 2-pump gas station and very well landscaped and maintained. As the years have gone by, the gaspumps have been removed and the building became an auto repair facility. When I was in my early 20’s, thebusiness was sold to the current owner, Sam. The sale of the property followed shortly thereafter. It was then thatthe upkeep of the property began to deteriorate. I have watched the continued deterioration of this land for manyyears and fail to understand why the owner continues to try to become a used car lot. Each time he has applied, hehas been denied or has withdrawn his request. Now, the City and many residents have spent their time and money toseek out a plan to renew the area of Oakton Street to Lee Street. The plans I have seen and the information I havelistened to, as presented by Cammiros Ltd., does not seem to agree to putting a used car lot at one of the gateways toour City. In fact, it would seem that the plan is suggesting these type of uses should be phased out or relocated to amore auto related area of the City. I hope that the ZBA for the City of Des Plaines will once again recommenddenial of this request. Thank you.”

Chairman Seegers called for additional questions or comments from members of the audience.

Mr. Brian Burkross, 2133 Webster Lane, Des Plaines, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case. Mr.Burkross stated he would keep his comments short because others made the same points. Mr. Burkross stated heintended to wait until the end, but that he had to leave. Mr. Burkross stated he want to point out that even thoughsome of the petition details may have been omitted, it would not be difficult to obtain many, many more signawres.Mr. Burkross stated, generally, many residents feel there are enough car sales in the City and do not share anyenthusiasm for growing that number.

Mr. Burkross stated he has actively attended the past City Council hearings and noticed the same request is maderepeatedly and repeatedly denied. Mr. Burkross stated City Council denial resulted, in part, from the owner’s brokenpromises to the residents with regard to improvements [on the site]. Mr. Burkross stated, to date, no improvementshad been made. Mr. Burkross noted the petitioner is very diligent about returning before the ZBA and City Councilbut shows no good faith as far as making improvements or taking suggestions.

Case /110-003-CU - I 141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case /110—01 7—CU — 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase /110-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 henry AvenueCase //10-01 2-CU - 1 I 08 Lee StreetMay25, 2010Page 10

Mr. I3urkross stated, in his opinion, if approval were granted, the City would be rewarding land owners for shunningthe process. Mr. Burkross stated he feels that granting approval would set a bad example for others looking toestablish businesses in Des Plaines. Mr. Burkross stated he did not feel it was fair to other businesses and residentswho follow rules and make every effort to he good neighbors. Mr. Burkross noted Bully Auto has sold cars in thepast, even though they arc not licensed to do so. Mr. l3urkross stated it was wrong to approve the request for autosales. Mr. Burkross stated that, if perhaps, Bully Auto would have completed the items and upgrades promised andhad, in any way, demonstrated good faith to the neighbors, the issue would not be so controversial.

Former Alderman Patricia Beauvais, who was sworn in earlier, stated she wished to address the Conditional Usefindings, Item B - Proposed Causes are found to be in accordance with the objectives of the City’s ComprehensivePlan: Ms. Beauvais stated the Comment indicates the 2007 Comprehensive Plan recommends conuercia1 use forthis site. Ms. Beauvais noted Oakton Street is obviously all commercial, but that the Comment does not address thespecific issue of an auto corridor.

Citing Item C - Proposed Use as designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriatein appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity. Ms. Beauvais stated this is exactlywhat she had spoken to previously - not following the City’s Ordinances or maintenance requirements. Ms.Beauvais noted that if Bully Auto did not follow these as an auto repair shop, she does not believe they will maintainthe property any better under a Conditional Use.

Citing Item G - Proposed Conditional Use does not involve uses, activities processes, materials equipment andconditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons property or general welfare, etc. Ms. Beauvais statedthe use is, in fact, detrimental to the property, neighborhood and most definitely an eyesore when driving downOakton. Ms. Bcauvais thanked the Board.

Chairman Seegers called for additional questions or comments from members of the audience. No persons cameforward.

Chairman Seegers called for questions or comments by members of the Board. None were raised.

A motion was made by Porada, seconded by Hotherr, to recommend the request for authorization of theoperation of a motor vehicles sales operation on a lot of less than 25,000 square feet in the C-3 District beDENIED.

Mr. Szabo stated, although the Board is required to vote on what is presented, the request appears to be too much forthe lot. Chairman Seegers confirmed the lot is undersized.

Mr. Porada stated he feels, generally, decisions relating to these types of facilities/uses were made with an obviouslack of forethought and foresight. Mr. Porada added that piece-meal approvals result in properties in need ofrehabilitation in 10-15 years. Mr. Porada concluded the problem is broader and not particular to this case.

AYES: Porada, Hofherr, Saletnik, Szabo, Catalano, Seegers

NAYES: None

MOTION CARRIED

*****

RUN uwrx016/1”)/20Q1h tnsprpt / lnRp_rnnn

l SIGNSIGN 18 TN POOH CONDiTiON. SHOULD BE REFACED OHREPLAGNO.

NOTES 06/29/2005MR. PAflL HAS PUT UP THE MM SiGN ANDPAINTED THE FRONT OF HIS BUILDING SIGN.IT LOOKS VERY NICE. I AM CLOSING THiSCOMPLAINT.03/08/2005LETTER 3.

S..

CMX Li WI’.LNGIUATh Wed Jun 29 ?00’

CI%1114 IPlItO..—— •-t’HOPRRTY INFO-NEW : CXO5OIOOS!i bA’I’1g 03/08/0% 1 PAHCI4t : 0928-105-002-0000TYPE: TO 01 ‘RiC; p timmann ADDRESS: 1855 OAKTON STDESO: iN8IKC’i’OH SII.F TNITTA’I’XD CSZ : DES PLAINER, IL 60018-2132CON?) A 1 NANT: (JWNEH : BULLY AUTO / S PATELCON?11. PR * ADDHI4SS: 635 W ELiZABETH LNSTATUS: C CLOKX (*4 03/08/05 CSZ DES PLAINI’iS, iF 60018OLtt’ IC 3’ll(: Li’I NO’i’ICK: 7 I l’tIt)NX

COMT’l JUNT (‘0) 31*1COMPI1A1NT TRXT

1855 OAKTONBULLY AUTO

P(UJ,Y AUTo CARE1855 E. OAKTON ST.

DES PLIUNES. IL. 60018(847) -- 824- 5866

ToCity Of Des PlainesI)epartment OfConimuniy Development

l)ear sir,

I received your Ietew Dated Mnrch 9, 2005 due to cold weather I can rtot paint

Or instaied new sign. I am faxing 1ierewih Estimate from Sign America Inc.

So p!ease grant mc a exention for installed a new sign t,’i

Thanking you

Sam Patel

flj&2Jt/J7/S

)IJ1” znw’ nn J.,,na dcnn n r’

I’’nt.amnI: Inn i:tniiii.ei in. 4q I /pr hil: on I.

CAHI4 t. LEcri Nut;DA’fl4 Mon Jun 27 2005-•-•••----CAHI4 INWU•

CI4oSeSQrrI flA’Y14: MS/I 2/0!TYPL’l: IC L)PI*t: tpatemnnDX&: iNsn’ItrrOII IlK) .1’ .LNI’I’SAi’KL)COMP1JhXNAN’J’: ‘VIM I3I4UDKHCL*IPL. P11 *STATUS: C (!111fli)COflICRR un

1——— —-PHflI’NR’I’Y LN1t0—-.———0’? •2U 105 00 00001955 OAKTON (V.P

DL4IJ P1.AJNBH, 1]..SIMNKAL( K IMTi11365 OAKTON STi*Ui PJ1ATNRS, IL 60018

I’Ak(’KIAD) )R1’IKHCSzOWNI4I(AD) )RRI;1;:

L’1)ON)4

ON (85/12/05NCfl’KB: 6

60018-2132

- ———.. .. .. -. ——.... — ——.. •j-- -. .- .. .. — —— ..COMPLAINT CODES 1: LANDSCAPECOMPLAINT ‘i’EXT LLflJX AND NXAN YARD NOTHiNG SLIT WWBID8 AND DiRT

NOTES *06_27.05 GRASS LOOKS GREAT, EVMN IN THEHOT WgATRER. CLOSN.*O5_13...05 FIXED UP, EXCEPt THAT THIRE 15GRASS SEED UNDER BAY ON TRW SIDE. FOLlflr?UP TWO WEEKS TO SEE IF FT IS GLtOW1NG.*05_12_05 LETTER *1

(c m) I

iI;L’& CTY OF DES PLANES14iD Miner/1uit:hwest Highaiaj Des Ptanes, thinos O144 847) 39153O0May 12, 2005

SHANK/\R K PATELBULLY AUTO1855 OAKTON STDES PLAINES, IL 60018

Subject: City of Des Planes Code \/iolations at 1855 OAKTON STDear Mr. Patel:

An inspection of the building/property owned, occupied or controlled by you at the aboveaddress has revealed violations of the minimum standards set forth by the City of DesPaines. These violations are:

Violation Code Case Violation Details302.12 No premises shall contain an uncontrolled growth of weeds. The areas to therear (including outside of your fence in the alley) and to the east of yourbuilding are just dirt and weeds. These areas must be grass, free of weeds,and frequently mowed.10.6 Minimum landscape requirements are that all yards shall be landscapedprimarily with turf. All areas of your property should be planted with grass andproperly maintained, weed free and mowed.

Please take all necessary steps to correct the listed violations. A deadline has beenscheduled on June 11, 2005, for the purpose of determining pro9.res and comp[lançIf you have any questions regarding this letter please contact14ie at (847) 391-6973.Sincerely,DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT’Building and Code Enforcement

‘-

/;p L L1’- 11

Tina Pateman.

Housing Inspector-

cc: Leroy Molinari, Deputy Director of Community/Economic DevelopmentTim Bleuher, Director of Community & Economic DevelopmentTom Christiansen, 2nd Ward AldermanFile

.

—

r

:

;i--

:

j

)N

II‘II\It\/t(‘t(li.Lt”{()J1/(H[IS/u?[I\/IN\/I[H

Ij[\[[\/’[[[([\JO[4\/()

/)Ø(’-cC’1V)-(1)I(,(/1‘It’IIA1I[ci(Ici

IAtt,IHI

()(I(tI’I[SIItiI()H’I(0,)III\/I[[tI’))

‘1III[)111(1

I)[

Iii(II‘1HI:titi,itiIi’IVNt5/IcI[tI0i

(1I,I,\/III\II,cI’ittIU,I,,)cI,I—

HiHc[cI/u,1,c’3/c’‘11,51(1I/vWQIHcI:iHHtI

1)‘1I’i‘I5/)

)i\[IIci\/)

,.I:Ij([(ii”I\/H(1ittdlHH)Nf1I0I’([tS/\-I\lt/—I(.It[\i{(1I—:[ciV)tCIi\1\fCF

‘I1’

ii,(cc(//I/‘i(‘JNi

I‘1()1—icI

5/iruc)

u:iIiI(5/I1I—I5/c•I

IiiI(ci/1),’-(IlIuiitc(lull•I‘IIII

“GRASS” areas to the east and south of the building

Bully Auto at 1855 Oakton St.

Weeds in the area on the aBey side of the fence


IIN/\ f\[F1\J1/I”i Ike: I i,itIi (j uIh; eniiiI

From: IM BLEUH[RTo: NA PAil MANDate: 5/1 2/1)5 101 5AMSubject: Rn: u1(hl Cno tO’s email

Dear woirmo inslomtol could yoo look into any vintatinno inctudinq the ‘hole’ that was dug up on Bully’s.Believe no, I know the history hr-so. 1 his was lIn 1st cam: I inherited when I bean Brnon1has ago. Imed tO(liVO LiTi(IH i espouse in the icsu tritomo. Itsmk you.

>> TINA PAl LMAN 05/12/05 10:1 hAM >:>

Pam has the tarot curd reader complaint, our old friend Elaine

am Ilie “woman inspector Dave Wilise sent out to bully Auto. Most have been about a year ago.haven’t heard anything else about ii since. (Pam is wni king with thorn on signs.)

• ]‘INA A MAN Jail) (lird NI idors and Nutty AutoPaqe 1

1:rorr inda Carutli” <Nndncaruth©corncast.net>ttiutiei t1.lust lints.urcj

L)ate: 51 1105 1:56PMSubject: I 110 C rd Reildel s and Bully Auto

I hum

I cii’s the iitnimiiitiu,i tlmat you asked me to send.

I am ( u (I I tciulcm ‘s dc truss is 1675 Oaktoci Street. The probIem : interior construction without permits anddo they have a business lk;ense? have people who saw the construction in progress.

Bully Auto addiess is 1055 Oakton Street. Pictures and minutes and corrections to minutes attached. Thepictures clearly show that the amount of soil removed was consistent with paving not landscaping. Mr.Patel staled the reason for the removal was to lay sod. There was no stipulation that the sod would be laidonly if the variation and conditional use was granted. The -emoval was done without permits and theinspectors were sent out by Dave Wiltse since he was the only one I could contact at the time of theincident. The inspector (I don’t know the name, but it was a woman) bought the story that it was forlandscaping purposes. Pictures were taken and shown to Dave at the time. He agreed that the removalwas consistent with something other than landscaping.

Accordinq to Pat Beauvais and Tom Chnistiansen, at the time the minutes were corrected, the reason tohave the correction made was so the City could require the laying of sod in the area from which the soilwas removed.

If I seem skeptical about the outcome of this issue, please don’t take it personally. What you may or maynot know is that the neighbors behind Bully Auto have been fighting for at least seven years to get someresolution to what we consider to be problems and violations and have had no success. Yourpredecessors Have chosen to ignore all concerns. If you are interested, have documentation (pictures,written arid in some cases, tapes) to backup any and all statements that I make with regard to the issue. Iam more than willing to discuss this further with you, however, my working conditions prevent me frommaking contact between the hours of Sam and 4pm. E-mail would probably be the best form ofcommon icat ion,

Hopefully, you will be good to your word and be able to get that junkyard cleaned up. I can tell you thatthere is more than likely a good amount of money, from fines, that could he made from that property.

Linda Caruth1868 Bennett PlaceDes Flames, IL [email protected]

•L

-c—-

-•M,••

--

•j%-

—

4_‘)-

—

••••

—:

-4-

F

•-

•“‘

•••-•—.

:••••

•

Eld[fr(jt37isiuiivj‘sfAiiiiiNVIAI:LL\/dVr\iIi

---4-

---r--.

r

STNA PA li-MAN - South & rLlst Side of Properly- August 2004.jpg

TIN/\ PAFF:M/\N- August 2004 - Bully Auto Southeast Coruer.jpg Page

I :c

**

‘.:*: 1* *

I,k44

JJ LTY OF DES14O Miner/Iurthiuest Highwaj Des Plaines, illinois O1.41lt8 • (847) 3913OOMay 12, 201)5

SHANKAR K PATLLB U LI., Y A U TC)1855 OAKTON SIDES Pl.AINES, IL 60018

Subject: City of Des Plaines Code Violations at 1855 OAKTON STDear Mr. Palel:

An inspection of the building/property owned, occupied or controlled by you at the aboveaddress has revealed violations of the minimum standards set forth by the City of DesPlaines. These violations are:

Violation Code Case Violation Details302.12 No premises shall contain an uncontrolled growth of weeds. The areas to therear (including outside of your fence in the alley) and to the east of yourbuilding are just dirt and weeds. These areas must be giass, free of weeds,and frequently mowed.10.6 Minimum landscape requirements are that all yards shall be landscapedprimarily with turf. All areas of your property should be planted with grass andproperly maintained, weed free and mowed.

Please take all necessary steps to correct the listed violations. A deadline has beenscheduled on June 11, 2005, for the purpose of determining progress and compliance.If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me at (847) 391-6973.SincerelyDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTBuilding and Code Enforcement

Tina PatemanHousing Inspector

cc: Leroy Molinari, Deputy Director of Community/Economic DevelopmentTim Bleuher, Director of Community & Economic DevelopmentTom Christiansen, 2nd Ward AldermanFile

“GRASS’ areas to the east and south of the building


lI,

-

—SSiVV

VV

V...-

.SII

- a-- —

“GRASS” areas to the east and south of the building


flr

.,.-v c--’j-4-‘ I

I-

Weeds in the area on the alley side of the fence


[i’. l)e tent Ia n/l.et en ion Basins and Ponds. etcnt i(iii/ret(iit inn lOIS us and pds shall belaiidScapcd. Such landscaping should nuliule shade and ornamental trees, evergreens,shrubbery, hedges, turf gi Diii id cover and/or ot hci pl ant u aiterials.

(. Watci Conservation. l.andscapc clcsigii lilIsnaill In tim re(fluieiuents of this Article must1 ecngmze the need fur water couservatinic While spniklcr irricalion systems arc rdlluired forcurtain landscapc aims, and may be desirable for other ipphicatioris, all irrigation systemsshall he designed to iiininwe the use of water.

H. Domestic Turf Crasses. 1)oniestie turf gmasses should he used in areas with little or no slopeto prevent tlie moo if of irrigat on water.

1. Energy Cimservation. Plant inatenal placcuient shouhl be (lesigned to reduce the energyconsumption needs of the development.

I. Deciduous flees should be placed on the south and west sides of buildings to provideshade from the summer sun.

2. Evergreens and other plant materials should he concentrated on the north and west sidesoibuildmgs to dissipate the effect of winter winds.

I. Preservation of Eiiisting Pant MateriaL Existing plant matcrial should be incorporated intothe landscape treatment of a site. Effort should he made to preserve and protect existing tTeeswith trunk diameters in excess of 12 inches. Construction equipment and personnel should beIcept away from such trees and their root systems by the installation of fencing materials at the

) tree’s dripliue.

J Berniing. Earthen herms and existing topographic features should be incorporated into thelandscape treatment of a site whenever determined practical by the Zoning Administrator,particularly when combined with plant material to facilitate screening.

10.6 Minimum Landscaping of Yards.

10.6-1 Turf. All yards within the City of Des Plaines shall be landscaped primarily with turf or other plantmaterials. Pavement of yards other than for parking or loading purposes is prohibited.

10.6-2 Trees. Shade frees, a minimum trunk size of 2-1/2 inches in caliper, shall be provided for all yardsat a rate of one tree for every 2,500 square feet of yard.

10.7 Parkway Landscaping.

10.7-1 Applicability. The following requirements shall apply to the ground areas within the street right-of-way which are not covered by pavement or sidewalks.

10.7-2 General Landscape Requirements. All parkways shall be landscaped in conformance with theprovisions of this Section. This shall involve improving the ground surface of the parkway withturf or other plant material, including parkway trees, shrubs, or hard surface treatments wherepermitted.

85

302.10 Sidcwalks/l)rtveways/Pubhe Areas: Add new Section as follows:30Ll0 Sidewalks/l)rivevays/Pnblic Areas. All sidewalks, steps, driveways, parking spaces and similarpaved areas fur puhhc: use shall be kept in a proper state of repair and free from all mud and other debris. Ifany sidewalk oi di ivcway or portion thereof by virtue of its state of repair shall constitute a danger to thepublic I ica I th and safety, the sidewalk or dii veway or portion thereof shall be replaced.302_Il Parking Lot Maintenance: Add new Section as follows:302.1 arkiug I ot Maintenance. All dn’ewiys and parking spaces for multi—family dwellings or lotsconta:iuiig two (2) or moic parknig spaces shall he kept free of snow, ice, mud or other debris at all times tolessen or to avoid congestion on the public streets. All off—street parkmg areas shall be kept in compliancewith the requirements of the City of l)cs Plamru Zoning Ordinance. Snow removed from off—street parkinglot(s) shall not be piled on the public right of way on a maimer so as to obstruct the safe movement ofpedestrian or vehicular traffic

302.12 Landscaping: Add new Section as follows:302.12 lt..andseaping. No premises shall contain an unconti-olled growth of weeds and/or grasses. Allpremises shall be frequently mowed. It shall be unlawful for any owner/operator of any premises, lot ortract of land within the City to peimit dead trees to remain on the premises, lot or tract of land.

Evrry owner/operator shall:

A. Maintain any plant growth in a pruned and fertilized fashion.B. Water the plant growth, but pursuant to the limitations of the City’s sprinkling law.C. Promptly remove and discard any fallen limbs, stumps, roots, obnoxious growth andbranches. Composting is expressly permitted as provided in Section 8-4-13 of the City Code.I). Promptly remove any dead and dying trees or other unnatural growth, which have rotted orare in deterioration condition.) E. Trim all trees, hedges, shrubs and other plantings so as to avoid interference with orobstruction to persons or vehicles passing on public ways, easements or adjoining privateproperty.

303.7.1 Dowospout/Cutter/Sump Pump Discharge: Add new Section as follows:303.7.1 Dowuspout/Gutter/Sump Pump Discharge. Gutter, downspout and sump pump discharge shallbe retained upon the premises and directed away from adjacent properties. The discharge of gutters,downspouls and sump pumps may also be directed into approved swales or drainage structures.303.8.1 Exterior Accessories: Add new Section as follows:303.8.1 Exterior Accessories. Mailboxes, television antennas, doorbells, coach lights, entrance lights, etc.,shall be securely and firmly fastened to the dwelling and maintained in good repair and working condition.303.12.1 Handrails: Add new Section as follows:303.1 2.1 Handrails. Exterior stairs, which are more than two (2) risers high, shall be located as requiredby the International Building Code and every porch which is more than two (2) risers high shall havehandrails so located and of such design as required by the International Building Code. Properlybalustraded railings spaced so that they do not allow passage of a sphere 4 inches in diameter, shall beplaced on the open portion of stairs, balconies, landings and stairwells.

303.18 Matching Exterkor Repairs: Add new Section as follows:30318 Matching Exterior Repairs. Whenever repair, replacement or maintenance of exterior walls orroofs is required, such repair, replacement, or maintenance shall be undertaken so as to match, conforrri andbe consistent with the existing exterior.

304.5.1 Handrails: Add new Section as follows:304.5.1 Haudrails, Every interior stairwell and interior flight of stairs, which is more than two (2) risershigh, shall have handrails which shall be located in accordance with the provisions of the international

Adopted August19, 2002

46

March 0, 2000

BULLY AU LO/S PATUL635 W [il/ABE ELI LNDES ELAINES, IL 60018

SubjecL City ol Des Plaines Code Violations at 1855 OAKT 31Dear Mr. PatH:

An inspection of ho building/property owned, occupied or controlled by you at the aboveaddress has revealed violations of the minimum standards set loBh by the City of DesPlaines. These violations are:

Violalioii Code Case Violation Details11A-6 SIGNS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDiTION AND BE PAINTEDAT LEAST ONCE EVERY TWO YEARS, INCLUDING ALL METAL PARTSAND SUPPORTS AND STRUCTURALLY KEPT IN GOOD CONDITIONPlease see [he attached sign codes and ether regarding signs. Your sign has to be painted ora new sign has to be pLO op.

Please take alt necessary steps to coriect the listed violations. A deadline has beenscheduled ‘-“ ‘ 20L’L icr the purpose of determining progress and compliance.If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact ne at (847) 391-6971.Si nec rely,DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTBuilding and Code Enforcement

_.

,)/ / .

Pam LunsmannHousing Inspector

cc: Leroy Mohinad, Deputy Director of Community DevelopmentTom Christiansen, 2nd Ward AldermanFile

1855 OAKTONBULLY AUTO

I •

I ‘i’flI $1111111 I fl ‘‘ennj’In in Ag 1I liii iiiI

(‘AI4 hi :;‘i’i N(:n

( A :: NNI 311 : 404ø:Haø 31 I AIl( ‘1411TV) ‘14: I ‘Ht)NH AI)I)I1E$5rP14: C: TI4I,14Pl10N34 CHiCOM1 ‘I .A I NAN’I’• I.) Nl)A (‘AHII’I’H OWNNIICOM1’I,. I’ll * I AflI)HEI:KHTA’i’I II: I: (‘IA )HI4 I (:H601110 I I’I411: I I ‘Iii INN

(‘(1141’) .A I N’I’ (‘1’) )N I NO )I4ttMl ‘I’I’( )MI ‘l.A IN’I’ ‘rI4W’I’. IUIMI-’ I N I .1 i’I’H OW HAVl4I, • HA 114) PM4 141 ,14V1V1’ ION?

NO’I’I41- OH 0’) .04 NMI4HGI4N(’V TO GO (JLI’ AN!) 5701’‘I’1114 (‘ONThC’POH Wilt) 1 H RUT’P0H141fl1V DOi NIl‘I’If 14 (A)? WIO A T’NRMVI’, ARou’P Li : iO AMtl( 1’)’ ‘Pt) ‘nIX s 1714 AND A I ,ANDSCAPER WARKKM( )V] NU WHt’IUS TN PRIgPARAT EON FOR NEWROD. AN I WALKED AROIINI) THE R1)fld)TNGLINDA (!ARIJTH WAS THERE W/A CAMMRA AN!)AHK1N(4 1414 QLJIWTTONH. [ ‘rot,)) 1334k 1 WOIIIJ)RM’I’LIHN ‘PG ‘J’HM ORK ICR AND TAIJ( TI) PAVEWI I ,TIfl4. ‘P1)0K SEVERAl1 PW)TC)R. TAI,KWE’ ‘P0I)AVI4 WHI4N L RETIJRNHF) AND HE WAH GOINr;‘IT) (‘HECK W/TTM OAKI,EY, BU’I’ IJN11NHR APH(.1PRLITV OWNNR IS CHANGENG THE GHADR OF‘I’IIM ?I1flF’IdNTV A PERMiT LB NOT Rb)QI)IRNI)‘I’fl RIIPLACJ4 ‘I’HX LAWN. RESTDRS, MYIJNDI#RSTANDJNG ER THAT THEY WERE FIXINGC’i’ FOR MS CARUTH’S BENEFIT. ALSO WEN’I’

‘I’D IJ4ROY HI) HE WOWS) KNoW WHAT WASGOING ON l)ONNA CATLETT CALLED ME T(X)TO HER WHA’r WAR HAPI9ENLNC4 A121’HO I DII)NOT FOR’!’ A STOP WORJI ORDER, THE OWNERDXC)i)Ei) TI) ASK THE GUYS TI) QIJIT FORI,1JIICR JJNTTL, WE HAl) THE OK. L)AVR WLT,’L’HkCALI.RI) MR ABOUT ii 30 ANT) SAFE) IT WASOK FOR ‘P13MM ‘P0 (!ONT1NITH. HE TALKED TO(CNI)A CARUTH AND ALDERMAN MURPHY. HOAFTER ALL, OF THAT, NO PROBLEM. CLOSE.

I N It ()I)A’PI.h 0II/WI/1A4()I’PIR: pbarger

ON OH/14’)/04L’U)’I’14Ht ‘I

I)A’I’I4 Mnii Aug ‘1 ?014’II’ I( 1) I’ 34 II ‘I’ Y I N It (I

(4’) 2)1 IMfi -0(43lHbb OAK’PONDEN F’T,AINI4B, ii, 600111I1IJI,I,V ALI’I’O18’,’, ()AKT()N1)14:: I’l,A 1N14H, II, hfrIL4 I :i

___________________

O8/O9/2O

• ---••

Landscaping Concrete Work Brick P

LW ieP

O8/O9/2Oj

I

/

t

I/

1’’

F. SCHARM C

Landscaping Concrete Work Brick P

II (1•i.I ((iii

I I•i

II\ Ii ‘‘II I

I!

— Iti) I’).1 1:1

I III‘\I )I I3?I

II1 II’IIi(

IIIIII,f.L3’I/\I\II. III’.III’ll

I IIII; U1I lI ,‘ •‘j/I/)!I

I ‘IIIII\’I: —

r II.;

I -—-I (IflI •(‘Irin—yIrp —j(h \frri iqy un In i c’c- p1 ir’Ii I n nn u 13’

/ ‘(“n•I 1.\IiZI(J’(’ II’jli(II—I:I) I)I\1 ‘IfI I_Ill /.,I

1 I’/II( i )I(’ 1 )‘J31’Ii( ‘1C)1\lI\J( UI II?l’III!I—’ ((.II11,P I1 ‘/ • /I —I I1 J.,I\$I II-4II—H I&III—/I’ 1111(IIIII(IIIIIII \f1I—II’II’— III’,I lI—Ill .I)I_II—?tVIII)II ;I’’’.II ).I’III Ii\1— I I

I ,‘Iñ •I I’I I—II-(I II•II I /.\I\I 1 1) 3\)i)I 1H—I’——’\) U:!.I\I’’ INIII ‘II—UI’ lIil—II I•I’()I—’ Ii-II .fIsII I— .\I. I”I(, IIIJ’I3—: — ‘.11 \))Iip) ‘‘‘C )FI’I’JI’’( )I( ‘3I•I!I\I’ l—’•I’’I’ I I I II’CjI t CI’’ II—II’; ‘3I/—’C—

I,’ —

It)

(1

I /\IC IrI-I

I—: I-’ I I’) FII I 1/) /(1/I

I F) ‘ , II-’,II( )I\I •:iI , (i/jl” C) —

CIC,I.’,’ /11111 I,’I’I’/\II1“-, I /1,I’,I’I )I’I -)‘I,

III:)- I /F (.1 I—- I I 1,1/lI/I —I

________________________

CITY OF DES PLAINES1420 Miner/Northwest Highway Des Plaines, IIinois 60019-4498 (847) 391-5300

December 26, 2003

BULLY AUTO REPAIR

1855 OAKTON ST

DES PtAINES IL 60018

Subject: City of Des Plaines Code Violations at 1855 OAKTON ST

Dear Mr. Gayagri:

An inspection ol the building/property owned, occupied or controlled by you at the aboveaddress has revealed violations of the minimum standards set forth by the City of DesPla inns. These violations are:

VoIation Code Case Violation Details— - —

302.8 Unlicensed vehicles on the property is prohibited.

Please take all necessary steps to correct the listed violations. A deadline has beenscheduled on January 25, 2004, for the pui-pose of determining progress and compliance.

If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me at (847) 391-5376.

Sincerely,

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTBuilding and Code nforcement

Elisabeth Schnepper

Housing Inspector

cc: Leroy Molinari, Deputy Director of Community DevelopmentTom Christiansen, 2nd Ward AldermanFile

CIWOF

\. iLLINOIS /

I in&1; 1)1 flP1.i.fl - 4g /priit out

CA I 1,_i: 51’ 1. i’1(.DA]’E Fri. P’ug 1i 2i)i

PARC1LADDRESSCSzOWNERAD1)RESSCSzPHONE

COMPLAINT CODESCOJ’PLA1NT rEYT

1 DEBRISSee attached e-ai.1 from Mderan Becker re fenceand debris.

NOTh’S ø8--1--ø1 ALLEY CLEAN AS A WHISTLE EXCFOR SOME SMALL PIECES OF CONCRETE NEARA UTILITY POLE. ASKED PM TO REMOVE ANDE-MAILED ALl) BECKER.. PHOTOS IN THE PILECLOSE..

INFO-—-PROPERTY INFO

NBF 33 J)ATN: ø8/øB/{?1 I 9--28—1øS—3—øTY1.-: AU) OTIR: n1aht 1. 1855 OAKTON STDESC;

DES PLAINES, IL 618’-2132COMPLAINANT: BEC.KEk?

BULLY AUTOCOMPI.. PH #1 635 N ELIZABETH LN

STZii.JS: (,j,( ) ON tB / ii/)/(1 DES PLAINES, IL 6(18OFFICER 1. 1.( NOTES 5

Tna Rtum;in le Ftoy AluPage

i—rorrr iiiia l-ateinanTo: I Om I leckerSubject: Re: Billy Auto

I asked l3uildii iq Inspector Weide to look at the fenco again and lie said that the installation is proper.Whei i the (made (:hauqes sIi0litly ovui flu ui iqlh of the toncu, it is uustoi naii y to keep [lie [01) of the fencelevel and lot it vary slic1lilly of II ie rot rot. Thu installer added a mi h cedar board (that matches thefence) nlonq the alloy so that It partially blocks some of lhat space. Commercial installations are allowedfl’ fence llOi(lht.

Tom Becker 08/10/01 04:24PM >>:

One of the questions the residents have is I tow is the fence as ouch as 6-B” above the ground and aboard added to the bottom of the fence nialcinq it taller than the 6” tall fence that is allowed., I thought thatthe height of the fence is measured from the grade???

>>> Tina Pateman 08/10/01 12:17PM>>>The fence was installed with a permit and Building Inspector Dave Weide inspected the fence on 8/3/01. Itpassed final inspection.

On my visit to the location yesterday, 819/01, the alley was clean, as was the area under the fence andbehind [lie fence on Bully Auto property.There are several small pieces of concrete in the alley near a utility pole. I will ask Public Works toremove them. They are not related to the installation of the fence, nor rio they appear to have anything todo with Bully Auto.I’m at x6973 if you have any questions.

P;i;inl Oily Aide- Page

From: Toni BeckerTo: I ims.i [iIeIiinl)D:ile: 8/10/01 ‘I:2’IPM3ubjecL: Rn: Bully Au to

One of tim qutn;tions tim usidents have is how is the fence as much as 6-8 above the ground and aboard added to the bottom of the fence making it taller than the 6” tail fence that is allowed., thought thatthe height ot lie fence is measured from the grade???:>>> Pea itc:eonn 08/10/01 12:1 7PM >>>The fence was installed with a permit and Building Inspector Dave Weide inspected the fence on 8/3/01 . Itpassed fiflEil i ispecfion.

On my visit to the location yesterday, 8/9/01, the alley was clean, as was the area under the fence andbehind the fence on Bully Auto property.There are several small pieces of concrete in the alley near a utility pole. I will ask Public Works toremove them. They are not related to the installation of the fence, nor do they appear to have anything todo with Bully Auto.

I’m at x6973 if you have any questions.

CC: Leroy Molinari

&2-1 Height Requirement.

A. l’lic height of a fence for a nun—residential use shall be h feet.

R. The height of a feitce for a residential use shall be 4 lcd when located in Front yards and 6 feetwhen lOcated in rear and side yards. I .nts kiwi ng double Iruttace , one of which abuts anarierial street, may erect a fence of 6 feet along the frontage which abuts the arterial Street.

l&2—2 Minimum Setback. gcthacks shall not he icqun cii Fur fences except those adjacent to alleys, inwhich ease such fence shall he set back a oruntin of :t ted limo he alley nght—of way.

8.2-3 Gates Required. All Ibnccs that completely enclose a residential lot shall have at Least one gateaccess to one or more principal entrances to such dwelling.

8.2-4 Locattim of Posts, All fence posts shall he located on the side of the fence facing the fenceowner’s property, and the fences finished side shall face the exterior of the lot.

8.2-5 Mainteiaanice.. Every fence shall be inaintamed in a good and safe condition at all times. Everydamaged or missing element of any fence shall be repaired or replaced immediately.

g.26 iil 1R eg itious for Fences in Residential Districts.

A. Transpreucy. Front yard fences in residential districts shall he constructed in such a mannerso as to provide at least fifty percent open see-through” area of uniform distribution.

Ill. Uniformity for Townlouse Fences. Where two or more dwelling units are connected by acommon wall, fences for such separate dwelling units shall be of uniform in height, material,type, color and design.

8.2-7 Special Regulations for Barbed-Wire and Electrically Charged Fences.

A. Barbed wire and electrically charged fences may be permitted only in non-residential districts,an only where the Zoning Administrator firsts malces a finding that such a fence is necessaryto protect the safety of persons or for security of the property, and issues a permit accordingly.In making his determination the Zoning Administrator may consider the type of use involvedand its inherent danger to the public safety.

B. Where the Zoning Administrator determines that a barbed wire or electrically charged fence isappropriate, the fence shall be installed at least 6 feet above ground level, and either:

1. In a gable configuration having five strands or less, or

2. Attached to an angled arm supported approximately 45 degrees to the vertical and havingthree strands or less.

8.3 Antennae Reguiatioiis.

In addition to conforming to the general regulations for accessory uses and structures set forth in Section8.1-1 (Accessory Uses and Structures), antennae, including satellite dishes greater than 24 inches indiameter, and any supporting structure, shall conform to the following regulations. Satellite dishes andantennae 24 inches in diameter or less shall be exempt from the requirements contained herein.

City of Des Phrines 63 Zoning Ordinance

‘cJ- •

:‘-. (•F(

/ ? ‘

•-.!-7 .//t/

F---

Oj ) )I /

)ji/ ,Iif\

L-t / L(

wnir\II./‘.L_-d)’U

/ ...-:A(,\IN-‘-q

- /-

/

ri_’:’v- _J1______ LOILL _I’_‘_1’ .C, L:

1VL(’-;;j ----:

C-;?”

rp

———-———- ----————- - .——..—- ..-———Tina Pate urn Bully Auto

- ——— — -

- —-

- —

—. Page

From: Tina r’ateirnTo: Torn [lockerSubject. Bully Auto

I he tei ice was ii istalled with a pci mit and Building Inspector Dave Weide inspected the fence on 8/3/01 ItpasSed tin,il ii ispect innOn my visit to the location yestei day, 8/9/01 the alley was clean, as was the area undei the fence andbet und 11 ic once oi i Bully Auto PFOPCi lyH ow ni o sovei al so intl COS of consi etc in the alley neni a utility pole I will ask Public Works tooniove II icin iF icy arc not related to the instaliabon of the fence, noi do they appeai to have anything todo with Bully /\utoI’m at x69/3 if you have any questions

CC: Leroy Molinari

Leroy Mel nnri

I uge I

From: Linda CEiruth <Iii iacaruthi)hiei:nmTo: “[3eckcr, I urn” tr:st?Ilnaol i:oiii.Date: 11)2)01 2:31

The fence is up. his the same height throiiql mit. II ri ins parallel to II in alley (3 off the alley) from justshort of the city sidewalk on Locust Sti eel side ai id what appears to ho right on the property line betweenCesars 8 Bully. There is a 45 degree angle at the t:orrier err ti ir locust Street side. The fence starts outat ground level and works its way to IiJ)proxiilalirly 1 foot off the ground ( it the bottom) at the east side oftim piopei ly line.

The alley is full of debris (concrete chunks, rind etc.) behii irJ [he leirce.Is all of this allowable’? By the way the stop sign is still buried in a tree.

I )(I• /‘

CIT( OF OTS AINESU I OMMUN i V 1’JLtOPMN’T

Building And Code intorcemenI: DivisionPhone (H47 ) 3ii 5388

INSPECTION WOPK L013 — ()N PiE PAOf DTAIL FO1EMAT.PFiNTID ON 88/82/01 PAG- 88.1

PMIT NU4BJRPiTTrPF

ZG CLASS

(i 1 4Z 7 268wgNC1

1 855 •‘1’ON 8TBUILD LENCiBUSINESS

Irs PLP3/iri8

SPC1AL COMMTRCIAL FNC’i

SINKAI? K i?AT1L

GEM CONTACTOF 754898

CONTI2ACTOR NAME:

635 W IZA!3ETH LN

INS?ECTIOM TYPE:SCHED DATECONT.?CT INFO:;:NSPECTOB

(2)3 /83/0 :t

.1. i. 1

iENCE FINALIMaPEC’r TiME

DAVID WEIDE

/

F’ it; (I1NCEL P WEE ‘A C00E

F9NCE CONNECTION, INC

:NSTTRUC’r IONS:

RESULTS:

1855 OaktonAugust 9, 2001

0 —.

1855 OaktonAugust 9, 2001

SS.

1’

0

J

I

I

b4

I

LL

-

CITY OF DES PLAINES


AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USEPERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7.3-6 C. ANDA MAJOR VARIATION TO SECTION 7.3-3 OF THE DESPLAINES ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A MOTORSALES OPERATION ON A LOT LESS THAN 25,000SQUARE FEET IN A C-3 DISTRICT AT 1855 EASTOAKTON STREET, DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS (CASE #10-01 7-CU).

WHEREAS, application was made by Shankur Patel for Bully Auto to the City of DesPlaines Department of Community Development, for authorization by the City Council of aConditional Use Permit in accordance with the City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance Section

7.3-6 C. and a major variation to Section 7.3-3, to allow a motor vehicle sales operation on a lotof less than 25,000 square feet in a C-3 District at 1 855 East Oakton Street, Des Plaines, Illinois;

and

WHEREAS, the existing zoning is C-3, General Commercial; and

WHEREAS, within fifteen (15) days of the receipt thereof said application was referred

by the Department of Community Development to the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City ofDes Plaines; and

WHEREAS, within ninety (90) days from the date of said application a public hearing

was held by the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 25, 2010 pursuant to publication in the DesPlaines Journal on May 7, 2010 and notice was mailed to all property owners within 300 feet ofthe subject property of the consideration of the Conditional Use and major variation so proposedby the Petitioner; and

WHEREAS, said hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held pursuant to noticepublished as required by law, wherein competent testimony and evidence was given with respectto how said Petitioner intended to meet the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, and said ZoningBoard of Appeals filed written reports of such testimony and evidence and theirrecommendations denying a motor vehicle sales operation on a lot of less than 25,000 square feetthereon, by a vote of 6-0, to the City Council on June 4, 2010; and

WHEREAS, said Petitioner made certain commitments to the Zoning Board of Appeals

with respect to the requested Conditional Use Permit and major variation, which representations

are hereby found by the City Council to be material and upon which the City Council relies ingranting this request for a Conditional Use Permit and major variation subject to certain termsand conditions; and

WhEREAS, the City Council has studied the respective written reports of the ZoningBoard of Appeals, together with the applicable standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, theStaff Report dated June 24, 2010, including the Conditional Use and Zoning VariationApplications completed by Petitioner, together with the exhibits to the Staff Report, whichinclude a Location Map, Site and Context Photos, the Traffic Study dated February 9, 2010, thedraft Zoning Board minutes of May 25, 2010, and the Letter from the Zoning Board of Appealsto the Mayor, which fhrm part of the basis for this ordinance; and

WhEREAS, on June 2, 2010, the Community Development Committee met andreviewed the actions of the Zoning Board of Appeals and the comments of citizen objectors. TheCommittee approved the Conditional Use by a vote of 2.-I and made several conclusions whichare summarized in the Staff report dated June 24, 2010, which is adopted as the rationale of theCity Council in approving this Conditional Use and is specifically incorporated herein byreference as if set forth herein;




made a part hcreof the same constituting the factual basis for this Ordinance. The Conditional


Public Act 94-1027.


applicable standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, and the representation to the Zoning

Board of Appeals made by the Petitioner, the Plat of Survey prepared by Tice Survey Company,

dated June 18, 1996, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit “A,”

and the Landscape and Site Plan prepared by Suber F. Zummerwala and Associates, dated April

1, 2010, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit “B,” the City

Council hereby grants Shankur Patel for Bully Auto a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with

Section 7.3-6 C. and a major variation in accordance with Section 7.3-3 of the City of Des

Plaines Zoning Ordinance to allow for a motor vehicle sales operation on a lot of less than

25,000 square feet in a C-3 District at 1855 East Oakton Street, Des Plaines, Illinois.

SECTION 3: That the following Limitations on Conditional Uses shall apply in



3.4-8: A. No conditional use permit shall he valid for a period longer than one year unless abuilding permit is issued and construction is actually begun within that period and isthereafier diligently pursued to completion. However, the City Council may extend theone-year period to a mutually agreed upon time.


C. Except when otherwise provided for in this Ordinance, a conditional use shall bedeemed to relate to, and be for the benefit of the use and lot in question, rather than theowner or operator of such use or lot.

3.4-9: The approval of a conditional use permit application by the City Council shall notauthorize the development, construction, reconstruction, alteration or moving of anybuilding or structure, but shall merely authorize the preparation, filing and processing ofapplications for such permits or approvals as may be required by the regulations of theCity, including but not limited to a Zoning Certificate and a building permit.

SECTION 4: The Zoning Board of Appeals recommendations, findings and conditions



SECTION 5: That the property at 1855 East Oakton Street, which is the subject of this

Ordinance, is 1egally described as:

LOT 17 (EXCEPT THE EAST 10 FEET THEREOF) AND ALL OF LOTS 18,19, 20 AND 21 IN BLOCK I TN WHITE’S STEEL CAR ADDITION, ASUBDIVISION OF THE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THENORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE12 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, [N COOK COUNTY,ILLINOIS.

PINs: 09-28-105-001 09-28-105-002 09-28-105-00309-28-105-030

3

SECTION 6: That granting of the Conditional Use Permit for the subject property is

granted upon the conditions set forth below. Upon failure of the Petitioner to act upon this

authorization within twelve (12) months of the date of this Ordinance, the granting of the

Conditional Use Permit fur the subject property shall he automatically revoked; provided,

however, that upon request in writing of the Petitioner prior to the expiration of the twelve (12)

month period, the City Council may at any time, or from time to time by resolution duly adopted

at any meeting of the City Council, extend said period of time. In addition to the foregoing, the

Petitioner must meet the following conditions:

1. Prior to issuance of the Conditional Use Permit, the Petitioner shall complete siteimprovements as indicated on the Site and Landscape Plans.

2. All landscaping materials shall be maintained in good condition so as to present a healthyand orderly appearance, and plant material not in this condition shall be replaced whennecessary and shall be kept free of refuse and debris.


4. All repair of vehicles shall occur inside the building.5. Emission of noxious, objectionable or annoying odor in such quantities as to be

detectable at any point along a lot boundary is prohibited.6. All parking areas shall be surfaced and striped to meet all applicable Building Code hard

surface requirements.7. Prior to the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit, the Petitioner shall submit a

photometric plan that limits the maximum amount of horizontal foot-candles onresidential properties to not more than 0.1 foot-candles at the single-family residentialproperty line.

SECTION 7: For the purposes of insuring the compliance with the municipal retailers

occupation and use taxes and to verify business activity at the business location of 1855 East

Oakton Street, Bully Auto, its successors and assigns, agree to annually provide a sworn

statement of sales tax paid to the Illinois Department of Revenue and to execute any and all

forms required by the City or the Illinois Department of Revenue in furtherance of the

requirement of this paragraph.

4


original Ordinance shall bc returned to the City Clerk’s office.




SECTION 10: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its


PASSEDthis

____dayof

,2010.

APPROVED this

_____

day of ,2010.


MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

Published in pamphlet fonn this Approved as to form:

_____

dayof ,2010.

_____________

CITY CLERK David R. Wlltse, City Attorney

I,

_____________________________,

being the owner or other party in interest of theproperty legally described within this Ordinance, having read a copy of the Ordinance, do herebyaccept, concur and agree to develop and use the subject property in accordance with the terms ofthis Ordinance.

Dated:

__________________________________ __________________________________

(Signature)

Lcgal’Ord\Cond Usc\CU Motor Vehicle Sales 1855 Oakton

5

fjiimjtt

COF City of Des PlainesCommunity & Economic Development Department


ILUNOIS Des Plaines, IL 60016Tel: 847-391-5306

Fax: 847-827-2196

MEMORANDUM

Date: June 24, 2010

To: Jason S]owinski, A i g City Manager

From: Michael Conlan, Di oct r of Community & Economic Development

Subj: Conditional Use for Auto Body Repair - 1141 Lee Street

Issue: The owner of the multi-tenant commercial property located at 1141 Lee Street has proposedan auto body repair business as an occupant of space within the building. Auto body repair facilitieslocated within the C-3 General Commercial district require a Conditional Use permit.

Analysis: The business in question, AAA Auto Body Werks, inc, has applied for a ConditionalUse permit to opel-ate an auto body repair business at 1141 Lee Street. The existing one-story, fourtenant building of approximately 12,000 square feet is located on a lot with a total area ofapproximately 71,196 square feet. The applicant would operate the auto body repair facility in anapproximately 2,500 square foot vacant tenant space that is accessed from the rear of the building.Twenty paved parking spaces would be used behind the rear of the building for the operation. Thetwo tenant spaces that front Lee Street are occupied by a liquor store and a restaurant; the othertenant space in the i-ear of the building is occupied by another auto body repair shop. The site hasstreet access through a driveway and parking lot on Lee Street.

At its meeting of May 25111, the ZBA recommended approval of the request on a vote of 5-I,conditional upon the plans to improve the appearance of the parking lot frontage and limitations onthe hours of operation, location of repair activities arid control of potential odors. Integral to theapproval is the installation of a 7-foot wide landscaped area along the Lee Street frontage, featuringshrubs or a continuous hedge with no fewer than two shade trees and a 3-4-foot high wrought-ironstyle tnce. The lot frontage landscaping improvements are redlLnred even though the proposed autobody repair operation would he situated in the reai- of the property, as the C’onditional Use governsthe entire site.

The ZBA also stipulated that the parking area, which serves all h)ur businesses on site, he broughtup to code and striped so that the required number of parking spaces for each business could heconfirmed. The property owner has questioned whether the parking lot requires resurfacing. Staffhelieves that that is a building code issue, and photos of the lot condition have been attached.

Recommendation: It is recommended that the Conditional Use permit for the auto body repairbusiness at 1141 Lee Street be approved, subject to all of the Conditions of Approval recommendedby the Zoning Board of Appeals.

ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report dated 5/28/10Parking Lot Condition PhotosOrdinance

., S

City ofDes Plaines(‘outin unity & Economic Development Department

Divisioti of Planning & ZoningDES PLAINES 1420 Miner Street

!LUNOS I)es Plaines, IL 6001 6Tel: 847-391-5306Fax: 847-391-2196

STAFF REPORT

Date: May 28,2010

To: Jason Slowinsid, Acting City ManagerMichael Conlan, Director of Community & Economic Developrnent

From: Scott Mangum, Senior Planner, Community & Economic Development Department

Subj: Conditional Use Permit for operation of an auto body repair operation, 1141 LeeStreet, Case # 10-003-CU.


Following the March 30, 2010 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting the applicant has submitted aLandscape Plan and paint booth details while staff has attached additional photographs of thesubject property.

Issue: The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use Pennit under Section 7.3-6-C of the 1998Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to authorize an auto body repair operation in the C-3District.

Analysis:Proposed Use Auto Body Repair

Petitioner Ammar Shaikh, 1466 Miami Lane, Des Plaines, IL 60018

Owner Dhitu Bhagwakar, 1141 Lee Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016

Plan of Operation Operate an auto body repair business with 2 employees Monday-Friday: %:3() am to 6:00 pin, Saturday 9:1)0 am to 4:00 pm.

Existing Use Vacant tenant space in multi—tenant building with a restaurant,liquor store, and an existing auto body repair shop

Surrounding Land Use North: Commercial. Auto-Related

of5East: Canadian National Railroad, Single-Family ResidentialSouth: Commercial Shopping CenterWest: Commercial Shopping Center

Existing Zoning C-3, General Commercial

Surrounding Zoning North: C-3, General CommercialEast: R-1, Single Family ResidentialSouth: C-3, General CommercialWest: C-3, General Commercial

Street Classification Lee Street is an Arterial Road.

Comprehensive Plan The Plan recommends a Community Commercial use for this site.

The applicant, AAA Auto Body Werks, Inc., has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to operatean Auto Body Repair business at 1141 Lee Street. The existing one-story, four-tenant,approximately 1 2,000 SF building is located on a lot with a total area of approximately 71 ,196square feet. The applicant would operate an auto body repair facility in an approximately 2,500square foot vacant tenant space that is accessed from the rear of the building. Twenty pavedparking spaces would he used behind the rear of the building. The applicant states that there willbe a frame machine, spray booth (OSHA and NFPA regulated) and car lift within the shop inadditions to materials and tools.

The two tenant spaces that front Lee Street are occupied by a liquor store and a restaurant. Theother space in the rear of the building is culTently occupied by another auto body repair shop.The site has street access through a driveway and parking lot on Lee Street. Conditions ofApproval are recommended to improve the appearance of the parking lot frontage, and limit thehours of operation, location of repair activities, and potential odors. The petitioner has requesteda waiver of the traffic study. Due to the nature of this request, staff has agreed to waive thetraffic study.

Conditional Use Findings: As required by Section 3.4-5 (Standards for Conditional Uses) of theZoning Ordinance, the proposed development is reviewed below:


Comment: An Auto Body Repair facility is a conditional use in C-3, General CommercialZoning District, as specified in Section 7.3 o[the l99 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, asamended.


of 5(ommeni: The 2007 Comprehensive Plan recommends a Community Commercial USC for thissite.

C. The proposed conditional use is designed, constructed, operated and maintained to beharmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of thegeneral vicinity;

Comment: The proposed Auto Body Repair facility would be located on Lee Street, an arterialroad. Conditions of Approval incorporate operational requirements to lessen the impact ofoperations.


Comment: With proposed conditions of approval relating to noise and hours of operation, noneof the functions of the auto body repair facility are anticipated to be hazardous or disturbing tothe surrounding neighborhood.


comment: After reviewing the petitioner’s plans, the proposed conditional use would be servedadequately by essential public facilities and would not overburden existing public services.


Comment: ‘l’he proposed conditional use would appear to have adequate public facilities; itwould not create a burden on public facilities nor would it he a detriment to the economic wellbeing of the community.


Commnent: With proposed Conditions of Approval, the proposed auto body repair facility is notanticipated to create additional traffic, noiSe, or odors that could he detrimental to surroundingland uses.

H. The proposed conditional use provides vehicular access to the property designed so thatit does not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares;

of5

Comment: The proposed project is not anticipated to generate a significant increase in traffic,and thus will not negatively affect current traffic conditions.

I. The proposed conditional use does not result in the destruction, loss, or damage ofnatural, scenic, or historic features of major importance;

Comment. The proposed auto body repair operation would be located within an existingcommercial building. The proposed plan would not cause the destruction, loss, or damage of anynatural, scenic or historic features of major importance.


comment: it appears that the proposed conditional use complies with all additional regulationswithin the Zoning Ordinance.

Recommendations: The Community Development Department recommends approval of theconditional use permit request for an auto body repair facility, based on review of theinformation presented by the applicant and the findings made above, as specified in Section 3.4-5(Standards for Conditional Uses) of the City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, subject to thefollowing Conditions of Approval:

1. Prior to issuance of the Conditional Use Permit, the applicant shall submit a LandscapePlan. The Landscape plan shall show a landscaped area with a minimum of a 7-foot depthalong the west parking lot property line (Lee Street frontage), consisting of shrubs or acontinuous hedge (measuring a minimum of 18 inches at planting and not to exceed 4feet at maturity), not less than two shade trees, and a three to four foot high wrought-ironstyle fence located 2-feet from the edge of the parking area.

2. Prior to issuance of the Conditional Use Pennit, the applicant shall submit a site planwhich incorporates above mentioned landscaping and revised parking lot layout.


4. All repair or painting of vehicles shall occur inside the building.5. Emission of noxious, objectionable or annoying odor in such quantities as to he

detectable at any point along a lot boundary is prohibited.6. Prior to occupancy all pai-king areas shall he surfaced and striped to meet all applicable

Building Code hard surface requirements.7. Prior to occupancy all abandoned vehicles and dead trees shall be removed from the rear

of the lot.

At its May 25, 2010 meeting, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended (5-I) that the CityCouncil approve, the above-mentioned conditional use permit for an auto repair facility in the C-3 zoning district, subject to Conditions of Approval. Under Section 3.4-4-C of the Zoning

.1

Page 5 of 5Ordinance (Conditional Uses) the City Council has the authority to approve, approve subject toconditions, or deny the above—mentioned conditional use permit.

Staff requests that this item be placed on the consent agenda at the June 21, 2010 City Councilmeeting

SM/sm

Attachments:

Attachment 1: Petitioner’s Conditional Use Application



Attachment 4: Paint Booth Details



Exhibits:

Ordinance authorizing a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of an Auto Body RepairFacility at 1108 Lee Street.

W/ Exhibit A: Landscape Plan prepared by 3D Design Studio and dated May 21, 2010

W/ Exhibit B: Plat of Survey prepared by George d. 1-larker & Associates, and datedMay24, 1996

V

May. 21 2010 02:4OPM P1

CASE NVMDER: 10 003-) DM flLD d 10Addrcs of Conditional Use: J1) I

__________

Di Phiinci, IL.

PDF’i* sie beinit: fJ Submittod on a CD-ROM OR (] E-,nalled to th Pmjact ManagerPrq$cct Mrniager___

_______________

I.cgal Notioc Ptilihcation 1)n1e pub1hetud In tirn Journal Topicshearing djo: 330-10 at 7:30 P.M. (nRooni 102, CIty Hall

Action by Zoning Admin1fratorIZoning Board afAppeela/CUy Coumilt

__________

TUTI

-.-

-.A Conditional line in requiieted ir ucoordemne with the City ofDci Plainen Zoning OrdlnnnceSection(n) — eu amended, to allow the;

4k.. ‘c.

on the prope1y deacribed by the attached toga) dcicription.

%-—L

--

P14 8inatu

________________

Fax:

MthngMdren: h]1)p”f LAi$. bis 9WJF L ,oOl

cjçTelcpbone !LQ. Paz:_____________MafUngMdrcwi L S4rfL & L r4

FROM : AT)jL KARKHAN IS ARCH I TECTS LTD FFX NO. 7735085757167—n27—21%

4

13:23:02 05—21—2010 111

CO NOITONAL USE APPLi(A ION

bO NOT WRITE $N ThIS AREA — FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

Applicent(n) Name;____

Telephone: 11 - ‘1I.5Q2.

me

•1

Contact Person: I\tkM _fliI_____ -—

-

i’elephone:fl1 t1 2 Fax: E-Mail: i;v iLIj (1 /

Mailing Mdrcss: JLLiIiZLJ

Address of Property: Des Plaines, IL. 60016

Property Index Number:—

—

(From tax bill or township assessor’s office)

Applicant’s interest in the properly: [j sole owner lesscc [] contract purchaser

fl Other (explain):

_________—__________________________________

Present Zoning Classification of Property:

_____

Current Use of Property: i -. r

Proposed Use of Property:

Bulk and Scale Evaluation (Please fill out completely):

e’

Name(s) of Trust Beneficiary (ies)*

Address (es) of Trust Beneficiary (ies)*

* All applications involving property held by a land trust must be signed by the trust officer of theinstitution holding the trust as the owner of the property. Additionally, the trust beneficiary andhis/her current address must be disclosed on this form. The application must also beaccompanied by the following:

• A certified copy uf the trust agreement..

• A letter from the trustee certifying that the beneficiary as shown on thisapplication is correct and disclosing any beneficiary changes or lack thereofduring the 12 months preceding the filing of th:is application.


‘l’hc Zoning Board of Appeals and the City Council review the particular facts and circumstancesol each proposed Conditional Use in terms of the ftIlowing standards. Because of this, pleaseanswer all questions in detail. “Yes” and “No” answers will not be accepted, and iiised, maydelay your hcai-ing.

A. Is the proposed conditional use, in fact, a conditional use established within thespecific zoning district involved? (Please explain in detail)

vL1 &11) f)

\

-. 2 ,

B. Is the proposed conditional usc is in accordance with the objectives of the City’sComprehensive Plan and this Ordinance? (Please explain in detail)

c

n !)

f L i

C. Is the proposed conditional use designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so asto be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intendedcharacter of the general vicinity? (Please explain in detail)

\ :(‘)t ...‘

U L‘ : ‘

.

C ( )(

i’ pc ‘ (f C. C ..

D. l the proposed conditional use is not hazardous or disturbing to existing neighboringuses? (Please explain in detail)

, -‘

L c\ ()V)Q t’Q.” -

•1

F. Is the proposed conditional use to be served adequately by essential public facilities andservices such as highways, streets, police and tire protection, drainage structures, refusedisposal, waste and sewer, and schools; or thc persons or agencws responsible for theestablishment of the proposed conditional use shall provide adequately any suchservices? (Ilease explain in detail)

\ c_ \O t\\ct; (k .

•, \ (‘

F. Does the proposed conditional use does create excessive additional requirements atpublic expense for public facilities and services and not be detrimental to the economicwelfare olihe communit 7 (Please explain in detail) (l

f

¶J’:

CL Does tlie proposed conditional use involve uses, activities, processes, materials,equipment and conditions of operation that. will he detrimental to any persons, property,or the general welfare by reason ot’ excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,glare or odors? (Please explain in detail)

,, 00

Does tlib proposednaitionaue piovide vehicular access to the property designed thatdoes not create an inf’erference vith iraffic on surroundrng public thoroughfares? (Pleaseexplain in detail

C \ C (

Does the proposed conditional use result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural,scenic, or historic feature of major importance? (Please explain in detail)

c

\

L-

‘. .l

IT.

oU

kJ\

L

I’

I

çc (Lv’) 2

‘60

2-_1

I hereby certify that all of the above statements and those contained in any papeJs or planssubmitted herewith are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Furthermore, I consent to theentry in or upon the premises described in the application, by any authorized official of the Cityof Des Plaines, for the purpose oposting; maintaining, and removing public hearing notices asmay be required, ing site anais.

(Date

J. Does the proposed conditional use comply with all additional regulations in thisOrdinance specific to the conditional use requested? (Please explain in detail)

()

S LfJ).\

(i

(

(. 1

(J

Authorized Agent)

(Signature of Owner) (Date)

Attachment 2, Location Map - 1141 Lee Street

Prepared by Community and Economic Deve’opment Department: SM, March 23, 2010

Att

achm

ent

3

Str

eet,

Exi

stin

gR

ear

Par

kin

gC

ondi

tion

s11

41L

eeS

tree

t,E

xist

ing

Rea

rP

arkin

gC

ondi

tion

s

Att

achm

ent

3

1141

Lee

Str

eet,

Aut

oB

ody

Inte

rior

1141

Lee

Str

eet.

—A

uto

Bod

yIn

teri

or

1141

TS

frp’t

—A

nfn

Rn,h

,T

,i*

ow

4w

Att

achm

ent

3

1141

Lee

Str

eet—

Par

kin

gA

rea

1141

Lee

Str

eet

-N

ort

hP

arkin

gA

rea

1141

1141

Lee

Str

eet.

Lee

Str

eet

1’r

onhrn

eIn

nkin

onnrt

h

/\/\t,. /\1 J () !( )I)’ \‘jiRl,.S.

-. S

H I I

lcbruauy 16, 20 0

(‘ity of l)es Plaines/o ing DeparEncntDes Plaines, II

Subject: Traffic Waiver for AAA Auto Body Werks, inc. at 1141 Lee Street,CS Pames.

AAA Auto Body Werks, Inc. is a start-up organization that offers a complete domesticand ftweign car repair service. It will be highly appreciated if the requircmen br thetraffic study he waived as the shop is not going to create a wony on the regular trafficflow. AAA Auto Body Werks has its own parking area and it will not create anyintcrflrcnce with the traffic as there is existing curt cut on Lee strcet to access theparking area of the shop.

If more inbbrmation is needed, contact Mr Amrnar Shaikh at 773—716—5502 or email at

How The Cross Draft Works:

The Cross Draft is an ideal booth where a cross flow application isrequired. The exhaust filters are located at the end of the booth in thedischarge filter section. The fresh air is brought in from outside, throughintake filters located in the doors and door side panels. The air then travelsevenly around the car towards the rear exhaust system, there it is filteredbefore exhausting out, This type of spray booth makes efficient use ofshop space and is available in solid back, drive-through, and reverse flowdesigns. Reverse flow booths intake air through filters in the back wall. Thesolid faced entrance doors are at the exhaust end of the booth. Thisprovides cleaner intake filtering and better control of shop dust that mightbe tracked in at the vehicle entrance.

Specifications:

Booth Shell24’ 4” long x 15’ wide x 10’ high O.D. prefabricated 18 gauge galvanized steelpanels. Pre punched nut & bolt construction with floor channels to secure thebooth to the floor.

Entrance DoorsStandard 9’ 4” wide x 8’ 10 W’ high door fabricated with tube steel frames hungon structural channel jambs arid skinned with 18 gauge galvanized steel withtempered glass windows secured with a BrixonTM latch.

Personnel Door30” wide x 84” high personnel access doors are pre-hung in heavy gaugegalvanized steel frames for easy installation. Brixon latches are provided foreach door opening.

LightingBright full booth illumination is provided by 10, four tube, 48”-32 watt T8fluorescent light fixtures by ..D, in the ceiling panels, angledceiling panels and side walls. Each is sealed behind clear tempered safety glass.All fixtures are UL listed and approved for their intended use and placement. Thelight tubes are not furnished with the fixtures.

Filtration SystemIntake side:20” x 20” AFR-1 filters are located on the EntranceDoor of the spray booth.Exhaust side:20” x 20” Heavy Duty Fiberglass exhaust filter pads. All filters can be replaced

Aftochmeflt

Fan30 inch, precision balanced with spark resistant aluminum fan blades that candeliver up to 12,600 Cu. ft. per minute each @ 5” Static Pressure, with lowoperating noise level.

Fan Motor3hp 208-230/480 volt, 3 phase, high efficiency, totally enclosed fan cooled(TEFC).

Finish090 Galvanized

“l

7•1

SW

A.

________

—-

I---

a—

—.:

.1

a

II[

..Ij If’ ‘ I 4

CITY OF DES PLAINES

1420 Miner / Northwest Highway * Des Plaines, Illinois 60016— 4498 * (847) 391 — 5300

June 1,2010

Mayor Moylan and Des Plaines City CouncilCITY OF DES PLAIN ES

Subject: Zoning Board of Appeals Case # 10-003-CU1141 Lee Street

RE: Request to authorize the operation of an Auto Body Repair facility

Honorable Mayor and Members of the Des Plaines City Council:

The Zoning Board of Appeals met on March 30, 2010 to consider the above petition. The Zoning Boardof appeals heard testimony on the case and continued the item to May 25, 2010. The Zoning Board ofAppeals submits the following:

1. Mr. Ammar Shaihk, petitioner, and Mr. Dhitu Bhagwakar, owner, presented the pertinent facts.

2. ‘[hree members of the public spoke at the hearings.

3. The Community Development Department recommended approval of the Conditional UsePenruit, subj ect to Conditions of Approval.

4. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended (5-1) granting approval for the Conditional UsePermit, subject to Conditions of Approval.


Arnie SeegersDes Plaines Zoning Board of Appeals, (Thairman

cc: City OflicialsAldermenZoning Board of Appeals Con missi onersPetitionersRecording SecretaryFile

—

LANDSCAPE PLAN

1141 Lee Street, Des Plaines, L

/ P. i’;’ i’ In: 10,5 001 LII nfl: fSC ttflOt’’ 1,’ L.t. Pd Si of .s h M,.cSfiSI s il cOt ‘0 kiPoet I/OF ‘t 057 Jc’, 4’ ci2 rIt ci II,. ‘cl .1 11671001 crC 0t tic 51tzL jJ 5. rj. if of ,, c ,r..,,’r’ C .5 I 50714 rae icTh..G4 2 1 L SI coLti’ccScUeLf’lco I - .4 4 0,tSc’LckS.’S, SI*O*c05 Sri. I- 5. ‘ , ¶01-. —5-’

ic.od 1C.t . — 0

- -1e.8.I

(z)— 11 1_--:.I ii - - - -

-.

l r rHjj’-

.‘ ‘

iLb , 19 — ‘-‘

h -— - ‘‘

110 iJI:,

- ‘*

4 -—

PiATi AREA- -— -

-------,.-,- —---—---—-____7 - - -- —

/P —

1’,

51 I.,”r. --

S—s —

S,‘r / -

- 4 5- -—5 5- -i— - ‘- ,— 5 -- ——-——7- - .—-— _4.__.__.____. ______ .1 ,).,(

r -: 1‘cc c ,‘ ‘z 4tX pE.5

‘—k c’-. -- ç’; pE.AD OMZr

L -:,

0’ 1.‘ 7-07

iii _‘*\,r’-

- 7. -

,tIt-’— --

— —\ —5- K.- ‘— ,‘— i—- ‘-- :- pi-’( c — - - >— ,—‘— >r’ i’ zco --- ,-s ,s— -s s—’ >— s _

714’

275

( I

IS C:)

I!

/

“I\!XHIBIT”

,1

If a’ ,‘r

U,, I I n,), .. t,VV I 4 ,;. ‘V..’! - ‘I’..’I, t ,‘

— ‘n. I’!’ I 1’ , I.’ - .4 ‘ ti ti,V.., .tL+..V,Vs, I, ‘•V*V

Vi•. r,• (V_ II

I I .1 I’ ‘• 11. I. I ‘ ‘a. VI I’

V’II .‘ II I’.-

VVI! ‘a:.,’..

4.

LU

L1

t)•

I —h‘it 1’ -

fttpror

OO.Id)r’O ele,1ut,r it P,,kInC!‘iovriI,d--- r-

Ct.r,A Oestioit.t,,t 2S 25 2(1Ann flep.ot Shvp

VV_V . .VJt‘1111.0) LsI.,l,l,sItntI’nr, JUlio 10 iliI0tlI!1’IthtSIVIifl - a80 V

roliil P.I,k,,r1 41 o.i

821 F n13’ Winoghl DII

Style Fenr located 2’front edge ol prahing let.7’ Wide La’rdscape Area‘4) “Conlpact’ Ilareing

Oush- 1888.(2)’Skre’ -fonoytacriol258.0.

38 Total Parking Spacer In the“ North Paddog tel lee Retrlrrurant

and Rated

6

ii

__

Er. Ugh Fiction Ia JRnn’a(r, Typ.

2’145”I

2(1—I”

1

529 North Orr,on herrlevarvlGrayslake. II 60(1311

(8.17)223.1891 (8.17)223.11012 FAXwebsiie: WWWV3(lnIOSI5nsIUolIO.ccIro

0,02 I: ia’aD3rtiIesigrrslr,tIin.v-on,

/Approx. 2501) SFBuddhrgSpace(Liqeac Rated)

Fl V

Ii

a-

±

Approx. 2500 SFReildlnq Space(Aide Repair)

C I’

2.Ira i.,e

I,V

________

\

I L,,

\‘l

l

Note:All padilny spcaos strewn err Iris plan shall ‘reel tie

‘ -:bairthig code and Vilage standards. This includes aVU

rnhrl’rnm of 24’ drives and 8-1)2 i III’ palling spares.

L1

_______________________

\\\

I I

0 20 40 60 80

Agaoo. 2580 SBwidhsg Space)Reslauriiot) -

-‘V.

Approo. 25(10 SFBai)ding Space -

(Aulo Body Roped)

:•

4,

.o,_-. .V ‘ ‘. ‘Ii

20 Total Parkeg Spaces in the SouthParlang Let torAaln Becy Repair

inking paces

I-

V1VVT I — _V_•..t

.1,4 IIc

11

05.

-.

I-

Q Landscape PlanRCA

EXHIBIT

(I)0-I0)

C83

0)cc.,10r.)a

no2

-- -— U— ‘

lo-;’ Ir V1’-’ VV ‘-‘i.e ‘‘

VV V

B

1 L1Ao Notr’d

or

520V1L1

z-zEt*1

sheet(s)of 1

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Flenry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 2

Case #10-003-CU — 1141 Lee Street

Request: A Conditional Use Permit under Section 7.3-6-C of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance,as amended, to authorize an auto body repair operation in the C-3 District.

Mr. Ammar Shairk, 1141 Lee Street, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.

Chairman Seegers aslced Mr. Shairk to explain his request.

Mr. Shairk stated a landscape plan, with the parking allotted for all the existing businesses had been submitted. Mr.Shairk stated an additional 50-60 spaces had been provided. Chairman Seegers inquired as to whether adequateparking exists. Mr. Shairk stated it does.

Chairman Seegers inquired about the additional information requested by the Board. Mr. Shairk stated informationabout the galvanized steel paint booth with filters had been provided. Mr. Shairk added the exhaust is emittedthrough the air.

Referring to the minutes of the May 11,2010, hearing, Mr. Hofherr inquired as to current conditions in the rear ofthe property - whether it had been cleaned prior to the establishment of the proposed business. Mr. Shairk stated thecleanup was in progress. Mr. Hofherr inquired as to whether the abandoned vehicles and parts had been removed.Mr. Shairk stated the removal was complete. Mr. Hofherr noted, as of yesterday, the cars and parts remained [on thesite]. Mr. Mangurn noted that, since the last meeting, Building and Code Staff had sent a letter to the owner notingthe applicable violations as well as the environmental hazards that exist.

Mr. Hoflierr asked that Mr. Shairk also clean up the trees and brush along the railroad tracks into the property so thatit is more presentable to the people entering the site as well as those who live behind the site and those who ride thetrain.

Mr. Porada inquired as to when the property had been inspected. Mr. Mangum stated prior to the issuance of theaforementioned May 6, 2010, letter. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether that letter would become part of the recordof these proceedings. Mr. Mangum stated the letter is l)art of the Code enforcement file.

Referencing the aerial photo dated March 23, 2010, Mr. Porada inquired as to the deficiencies itemized in the letter.Mr. Mangum stated the cleanliness of the property as well as antifreeze and other liquids that are considered to beenvironmental hazards. Mr. Mangum added that parking also existed on non-compliant surfaces. Mr. Poradaconfirmed the liquids on the site were not found in bottles or containers, but in pools of liquid on the site. Mr.Mangum confirmed that was correct. Mr. Porada inquired as to the protocol that is followed after issuance of theletter. Mr. Mangum stated the owner was given until June 5, 2010, to bring the property into compliance and thatthe Administrative Hearing process is initiated if it is not complete by that date.

Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the site plan included in the Board’s March 30, 2010, materials was still valid.Mr. Shairk stated a new site plan had beeti submitted. Mr. Porada inquired as to the Plat of Survey dated May 24,1996. Mr. Shairk stated a new Plat of Survey had also been submitted. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether it was thelarge document. Mr. Mangum stated the May 24, 1996, survey had been used by the contractor hired by thepetitioner as a basis to draw the dimensions of the parking spaces on site as well as the parking required for all thetenant uses as had been required in the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether Mr. Mangumwas referring to the ledger sized sheet. Mr. Mangum stated the revised landscape plan dated May 21, 2010. Mr.Porada indicated he did not see a date. Chairman Seegers noted the date was found above the number on the rightside. Mr. Shairk stated he would obtain a new survey if one was needed.

‘-U achrnertt

Case #10-003-CU - 1141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU- 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-018-CU -480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 1-lenry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 3

Referencing four photographs, Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the photos were new. Mr. Shairk confirmed theywere. Mr. Porada recalled that, during the March 30, 2010, hearing, the interior layout had been requested.Chairman Seegers stated, at that time, the fire separation was the main concern.

Mr. Porada expressed concern over the placement of the spray booth and whether the spray booth would be locatedon the wall shared with the restauralit. Mr. Shairk stated it would not. Mr. Szabo inquired as to whether aseparation wall exists between the petitioner’s space and the restaurant. Mr. Manguin stated Building and FireDepartment personnel confirmed a masonry wall exists, but without fire rated openings, which are required. Mr.Szabo confirmed the doors were not fire rated. Mr. Mangum confirmed that was correct. Chairman Seegersinquired as to where the doors lead. Mr. Mangum stated the doors lead to the restaurant. Referencing the photo inthe lower left corner, Mr. Porada confirmed that photo illustrated the masonry wall being discussed. Mr. Shairkstated it is a big, thick wall. Mr. Porada confirmed that was the wall adjacent to the restaurant. Mr. Mangumconfirmed it was the west wall.

The owner of the property, Dhitu Bhagwakar, 1141 Lee Street, Des Plaines, Illinois was sworn in to give testimonyin this case. Mr. Bhagwakar confirmed the masonry wall separates Mr. Shairk’s space from the restaurant. Mr.Porada inquired as to what happens when Mr. Shairk’s business is established. Mr. Bhagwakar stated the restaurantis already fire rated and the doors would not be visible. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the doors would remain.Mr. Bhagwakar stated they would. Mr. Porada confirmed whether the doors are fire rated. Mr. Bhagwakar statedthey are. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the garage door would remain. Mr. Bhagwakar stated it would. Mr.Porada inquired as to whether the windows would remain. Mr. Bhagwakar stated he may replace the existingwindows with glass block. Mr. Porada inquired as to how many overhead doors currently exist on the east wall.Mr. Bhagwakar stated one garage door and one entry door. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether any garage doorswould be added. Mr. Shairk stated none would.

Mr. Porada inquired as to the framed wall. Mr. Bhagwakar stated the framed wall is shared with the restaurant. Mr.Porada inquired as to what is behind the brick and plywood. Mr. Bhagwakar stated the brick and plywood would heenclosed by drywall. Mr. Porada inquired as to whether the roof truss was also wood. Mr. Bhagwakar stated it is.

Chairman Seegers called for additional questions of the petitioners by members of the Board.

Mr. Saletnik confirmed that the paint booth discharge and construction of the fire walls would be part of theBuilding and Code review at time of construction. Mr. Mangum confirmed that was correct.


Staff Report:

Chairman Seegers called for questions or comments by members of the audience, either in favor of, or in objectionto the proposal.

Former Alderman Patricia Beauvais, 547 Webford, Des Plumes, Illinois, was sworn in to give testimony in this case.Ms. Beauvais stated, unlbrtunately, City Ordinance does not include any provision to suspend or revoke aC’onditional Use once granted. Ms. Beauvais noted that many auto businesses do not heed the Conditions set forthand the only recourse the City has is to issue Building Department violations. Ms. Deauvais noted that the lack ofupkeep by the auto sales and repair facilities pose a problem within the City.

Ms. Beauvais stated she was present to request the Board augment the existing Ordinances. Ms. Beauvais notedthere is no incentive for businesses to comply with the terms of Conditional Use if the City cannot uphold them.Chairman Seegers noted the ZBA does not write the Ordinances and cannot control the enforcement, hut can onlymake stipulations as part of its recommendations. Chairman Seegers stated Ordinances can only be changed by CityCouncil.

a


Stating his agreement with Chairman Seegers comments, Mr. Porada inquired as to whether Ms. Beauvais wasaware of other municipalities in which the provisions requested were available. Ms. Beauvais stated she was not.Ms. Beauvais stated her awareness that the Building Department is inundated with phone calls from residents filingcomplaints. Ms. Beauvais noted more and more Conditional Uses are being approved. Ms. Beauvais acknowledgedthe ZBA is not the only Board in need of being addressed, hut that she felt she must start somewhere. Ms. Beavuaisreiterated the magnitude of the problem and stated she was not sure of the answer. Referencing the period Ms.Beauvais served as Alderman, Mr. Porada noted she was in a better position [than the ZBA] to address the issue.Mr. Porada noted the Illinois Constitution allows Conditional Use to run with the land rather than any business andthat considerable latitude between enforcing and revoking exists. Ms. Beauvais stated, as Alderman, she was aproponent of giving petitioners the benefit of the doubt but has witnessed it spiral out of control in recent years andwishes she would have addressed the matter more firmly. Ms. Beauvais stated she has more opportunity to observesites such as the one at issue now that she has more time.

Ms. Beauvais stated it was her hope that if she addressed the ZBA and the City Council, there would be somesuggestions with regard to obtaining future compliance.

Chairman Seegers stated Ms. Beauvais’ points were well taken and thanked her for her comments.

Mr. Hofherr stated citizens have recourse. Mr. Hofherr suggested that if a person is aware of a property that is indisrepair, blighted or in any way objectionable, that they should register a complaint with the Code Enforcement1)epartment. Mr. Hoflierr stated an officer physically inspects the property when a complaint is filed and that theowner, and sometimes tenants, are notified of his findings and given a specific number of days to comply. Mr.Hotherr stated if compliance is not made within the specified time period, Administrative Hearing action is initiatedand, if the owner is found guilty, a fine levied. Mr. Hotherr stated that could be avoided if the owner is infbrrned theprocess is more costly than correcting the problem(s). Mr. Hoflierr encouraged residents to file complaints ifwarranted. Mr. Porada added that, in his experience, the Code Enforcement Division has always been responsive.Mr. Porada encouraged residents to attend the Administrative Hearings. Mr. Mangum noted that Article IV of theCity’s Zoning Ordinance, Enforcement of Penalties, include a process for revocation. Mr. Porada inquired whowould initiate such a process. Mr. Mangum stated anyone who lodges a complaint for investigation.

Chainnan Seegers stated the ZBA has the option to include recommendations with its approval(s) and can do sowhen appropriate. Chairman Seegers added the City Council can then choose to enforce, add or deduct from theBoard’s recommendation.

A motion was made by Saletnik, seconded by Szabo, to recommend authorization of an auto body repairoperation in the C-3 District, subject to the Conditions set forth in the Staff Report.

Mr. Szabo inquired as to the timetable for resurfacing the lot. Mr. Mangum stated the Board could require theresurfacing be completed prior to the issuance of the Permit. Mr. Saletnik stated he did not wish to pose any undueburden to the petitioner by specifiing a date, but perhaps that all Conditions should be met before an occupancyPermit is issued.

Mr. Hoflierr asked that the removal of all abandoned vehicles and auto parts in the rear and east side, along therailroad tracks, as well as the removal of dead trees and general cleanliness, he included. Mr. l-lofherr stated it wasnecessary to retain the screen, hut that it needed to he cleaned up. Mr. I3hagwakar stated he will remove the deadtrees and clear the branches, but stated his tenant has a right to keep vehicles Ofl the property. Mr. Bhagwakar addedthat the tenant, not he, should he responsible to clean up that area. Mr. Hotherr stated, as the owner, Mr.Bhagawakar not only receives the citations, but is responsible for the upkeep of the property. Mr. Bhagwakar statedhe has mode the request, but that the tenant has not been responsive and perhaps would be more responsive to Citypersonnel.

Case #10-003-CU - 1 141 Lee Street (cont’d)Case #10-017-CU - 1855 E. Oakton StreetCase #10-01 8-CU - 480 Potter RoadCase #10-015-V - 1415 Henry AvenueCase #10-012-CU - 1108 Lee StreetMay 25, 2010Page 5

Mr. Saletnik amended his motion to also include the provisions for cleanup as stated in Staffs letter of May 6,2010. Mr. Szabo seconded the amended motion.

AYES: Saletnik, Szabo, Catalano, Hoffncr, Seegers

NAYES: Porada

MOTION CARRIED

4

4

L.

f’: 1

Ct

Li•1’

I)A

* “Ii

‘ci’

4.

“1

.1

A 3fr

a

—n’ .V4

4‘1

‘II•hL.

I• L •‘.

; .‘J-I:

‘ I‘I

4

I)

-•4

._.

-

r:-

‘1-

-.

•1

--‘

--

-

‘I.

/•-

4.

-

-. t7

41

<

Ct Cit

.

h

“S

• S. H•

- S.

‘.‘,.;I—‘—-

t:u--*

r.c;-,C1‘•‘

‘

II5

,1

1

1:“I

‘-1

I—

H;—I,’

-‘p

-.1•

a

dt

p

r..-

I

;)‘

Ikc I4jt.*

1

•*1

;,

-‘••

C-

‘—

...

-

:-

•—;-;

—

-,—

-

,-

--:----

=

—

-f-

• ::4

a,

•1

‘$f

c

,(4

[

I:e

I

• kV

11

4.

1

4

n

I

I

ti ‘4

!

i

SI.

5;

‘$5,

‘..

VVVV

‘‘VSVV

44?V44‘

4

I

:

• .•,

•(

:L;

CITY OF DES PLAINES


AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING FOR A CONDITIONAL USEPERMIT UNDER SECTION 7.3-6 C. OF THE ZONINGORDINANCE TO PERMIT AN AUTO BODY REPAIROPERATION AT 1141 LEE STREET, DES PLAINES,ILLINOIS. (CASE #10-003-CU).

WHEREAS, application was made by Ammar Shaikh for AAA Auto Body Werks, Inc.to the City of Des Plaines Department of Community Development for authorization by the CityCouncil of a Conditional Use Permit to permit an auto body repair operation under Section 7.3-6 C. of the Zoning Ordinance at 1141 Lee Street in Des Plaines, Illinois; and

WHEREAS, the existing zoning is C-3, General Commercial District; and

WHEREAS, within fifteen (15) days of the receipt thereof, said application was referredby the Department of Community Development to the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City ofDes Plaines; and

WHEREAS, within ninety (90) days from the date of said application a public hearingwas held by the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 25, 2010 pursuant to publication in the DesPlaines Journal on March 12, 2010 and notice was mailed to all property owners within 300 feetof the subject property of the consideration of the Conditional Use so proposed by the Petitioner;and

WHEREAS, said hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held May 25, 2010pursuant to notice published as required by law, wherein competent testimony and evidence wasgiven with respect to how said Petitioner intended to meet the provisions of the ZoningOrdinance. On June 1, 2010, said Zoning Board of Appeals filed written reports to the CityCouncil of such testimony and evidence and their recommendations approving, by a vote of 5-I,an auto body repair operation under Section 7.3-6 C. of the Zoning Ordinance, in a C-3, GeneralCommercial District, at 1141 Lee Street, Des Plaines, Illinois; and

WHEREAS, said Petitioner made certain commitments to the Zoning Board of Appealswith respect to the requested Conditional Use Permit, which representations are hereby found bythe City Council to be material and upon which the City Council relies in granting this requestfor a Conditional Use Permit subject to certain terms and conditions; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the respective written reports of the ZoningBoard ot Appeals, together with the applicable standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, theStaff Report dated May 28, 2010, including the Conditional Use Application completed by thePetitioner, together with the exhibits to the Staff Report, which include a Location Map, Site andContext Photos, Paint Booth Details, the draft Zoning Board minutes of May 25, 2010, and theLetter from the Zoning Board of Appeals to the Mayor, which form part of the basis for thisordinance;




made a part hereof, the same constituting the factual basis for this Ordinance. The Conditional


Public Act 94-1027.


applicable standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, the representation to the Zoning Board of

Appeals made by the Petitioner, the Landscape Plan prepared by 3D Design Studio, dated May

21, 2010, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhiht “A,” and the Plat

of Survey, prepared by George D. Harker & Associates, dated May 24, 1996, a copy of which is

attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit “B,” the City Council hereby grants a

Conditional Use Penuit to permit an auto body repair operation, under Section 7.3-6 C. of the

Zoning Ordinance, at 1141 Lee Street in Des Plaines, Illinois.

SECTION 3: That the following Limitations Ofl Conditional Uses shall apply in



3.4-8: A. No conditional use permit shall he valid for a period longer than one year unless abuilding permit is issued and construction is actually begun within that period and isthereafter diligently pursued to completion. However, the City Council may extend theone-year period to a mutually agreed upon time.


C. Except when otherwise provided ftr, this Ordinance, a conditional use shall bedeemed to relate to, and be for the benefit oF. the use and lot in question, rather than theowner or operator of such use or lot.

3.4-9: The approval of a conditional use permit application by the (‘ity Council shall notauthorize the development, construction, reconstruction, alteration or moving of any

2

building or structure, but shall merely authorize the preparation, filing and processing ofapplications for such permits or approvals as may be required by the regulations of theCity, including but not limited to a Zoning Certificate and a building permit.

SECTION 4: The Zoning Board of Appeals’ recommendations, findings and conditions



SECTION 5: That the property at 1141 Lee Street, which is the subject of this


THE SOUTH 107.07 FEET (MEASURED ON THE WEST LINE THEREOF)OF LOT 1 AND ALL OF LOT 2 IN AUGUST RADDATZ’ SUBDIVISION OFPART OF THE NORTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH,RANGE 12 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING EASTOF LEE STREET AND WEST OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THEMINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL AND SAULT SAINT MARIE RAILWAYACCORDING TO THE PLAT OD SAID SUBDIVISION FILED IN THEOFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TiTLES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOISON DECEMBER 19, 1941 AS DOCUMENT NO. LR 144799.

PIN: 09-20-214-006

SECTION 6: That granting of the Conditional Use Permit for the address of 1141 Lee

Street within the subject property is granted upon the conditions set forth below. Upon failure of

the Petitioner to act upon this authorization within twelve (12) months of the date of this

Ordinance, the granting of the Conditional Use Permit for the subject property shall be



time by ordinance duly adopted at any meeting of the City Council, extend said period of time.

in addition to the foregoing, the Petitioner must meet the following conditions:

1. Prior to issuance of the Conditional Use Permit, the Petitioner shall submit a LandscapePlan. The Landscape Plan shall show a landscaped area with a minimum of a 7-foot depthalong the west parking lot property line (Lee Street frontage), consisting of shrubs or acontinuous hedge (measuring a minimum of 1 8 inches at planting and not to exceed 4feet at maturity), not less than two shade trees, and a three to four foot high wrought—ironstyle fence located 2-feet from the edge of the parking area.

3

2. Prior to issuance of the Conditional Use Permit, the Petitioner shall submit a site planwhich incorporates above mentioned landscaping and revised parking lot layout.

3. Petitioner agrees that hours of operation shall be limited to: Monday-Friday: 8:30 am to6:00 pm and Saturday 9:00 am to 4:00 pm.

4. All repair or painting of vehicles shall occur inside the building.5. Emission of noxious, objectionable or annoying odor in such quantities as to he

detectable at any point along a lot boundary is prohibited.6. Prior to occupancy, all parking areas shall he surfaced and striped to meet all applicable

Building Code hard surface requirements.7. Prior to occupancy all abandoned vehicles and dead trees shall be removed from the rear

of the lot.


neglects or refuses to comply with or resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this

Ordinance shall be fined not less than Seventy-five Dollars ($75.00) or more than Seven



addition, the appropriate authorities of the City may take such other action as they deem proper

to enforce the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, including, without limitation, an action in

equity to compel compliance with its terms. That any person, firm or corporation violating the

terms of this Ordinance shall be subject, in addition to the foregoing penalties, to the payment of



original Ordinance shall be returned to the City Clerk’s office.


invalid, the remainder shall continue in full three and effect without affecting the validity of the


SECTION 10: That this Ordinance shall he in full three and effect from and after its


4

PASSED this

_____day

of , 2010

APPROVED this

_____

day of , 2010


MAYORATTEST:

CITY CLERK

Published in pamphlet form this Approved as to form:

_____dayof

,2010

______________

L_R. W,ArCiTY CLERK David R. Wiltse, City Attorney

I,

______ ________,

being the owner or other party in interest ofthe property legally described within this Ordinance, having read a copy of the Ordinance, dohereby accept, concur and aee to develop and use the subject property in accordance with theterms of this Ordinance.

Dated:

_____________________________

(Signature)

Legal\Ord\Special\CU\CU I 141 Lee St Auto Body Repair

5

I

I.

4

‘,1

‘ii.

C(,Of1&I I). IIARj4 A5SCNZIATEf • RE6)ThRED LAN)? WRVEYOR0000001tNlp 3M44L rj06; PIo6I.ILI 404, 60000 001 01040, 6313)11,3 1061,

Lmy.I OOaApIa...o1,,0610101 .‘E d..b..fl1l 0414,,0J 44444 l,,.1lt4Pl .434 04400 0000Mrmlprye064l 444.40610,06,0104.444,41.. 30. 4...,)3. 4,4:04k

7r

\

13.414, Ih0*.’.

I

J00,.,..,l, l 441•04.4,•4. 004r004d$. I .4..0t068014

- - -

Committee of the WholçAgçnda Item #2d

City of Des PlainesCommunity & Economic Development Department


ILLINOIS Des Plaines, IL 60016Tel: 84T391-5306

Fax: 847-82721 96

MEMORANDUM

Date: J tine 22, 201 0

lo: Jason Slowin i, cling City Manager

From: Michael Con , irector of CommLimty & Economic Development

Subj: Overlay District for Electronic Signage - Mannheini Road

Issue: At its meeting of June 2, 2010, the Community Development committee directed stall toresearch the potential of establishing a zoning overlay district which would allow different standardsfor electronic signage within a designated commercial corridor.

Analysis: An overlay district is a zoning tool that is imposed over the existing zoning to provide anadditional layer of development standards to address special land use needs. Floodplain mapsrepresent a common type of overlay district, as do historic preservation districts, in which a higherlevel of design review is required of properties within the district boundaries. The last overlaydistict authorized by the City Council was in 2009 to accommodate the construction andmaintenance of horse barns in that area of the city in which horses may he stabled; the draft Form-based Code proposes overlay districts in residential areas in which the street setbacks create aunique neighborhood character. in this instance, a proposed overlay would define the boundaries ofone or more commercial corridors along which larger electronic sign components would beallowed.

Staff was asked to explore the potential for an overlay district along Mannheirn Road fromTouhy to Higgins in which different standards for electronic signage would be allowed. Theowner of the Royal Touch Car Wash at 2711 Mannheim Road is requesting an electronicmessage board sign that exceeds the size allowed under the zoning code. Electronic messageboards are allowed in C-3 General Commercial zoning districts, provided that the electroniccomponent does not exceed 30% of the total sign face or 20 square feet, whichever is smaller.While a variance can be granted from these limitations, the code does not permit a variancegreater than 10% of the allowable size. In the case of Royal Touch, the business has requestedan electronic component of 43 square feet, more than double the maximum allowable size.

Royal Touch appeared before the Community Development committee on January 26111 to requestan amendment to the zoning code that would allow the expansion of the electronic element to theexisting sign on premises. At that meeting, the committee voted not to support changes to the code

—

code that would have allowed the requested sign size, with concerns of the precedent—creating

nature of such a change being cited. Committee members stated the desire to revisit this issue to

discuss potential options for signage along the Mannheim Road corridor, however.

On June 2tR, the Community Development committee again addressed the issue of expanded

electronic signage for the Royal Touch operation, and specifically requested that staff research the

Village of Palatine zoning ordinance, which restricts electronic message boards to specific

commercial corridors and allows the electronic portion of a sign to comprise up to 40% of the sign

face. Aldermen suggested that, given the unique character of Mannheirn Road south of Touhy, with

a higher posted speed limit than is found along other eorndors, may create a condition that warrants

special consideration of commercial signage.

The Palatine Code ofOrdinances Appendix A Zoning; Article VIII. Signage, section 8.01 reads:

(i) Electronic Mcssagc’ Boards.

(I) Special Use Requirement. All Electronic Message Boards shall obtain Special Use approval.

(2) Location.a. Electronic message boards shall he restricted to business uses in the following corridors:

Northwest Highway, Rand Road, Lake Cook Road and Dundee Road.

The Ordinance also states that a maximum of four (4) different messages may be displayed within a

twenty-four (24) hour period, and that the electronic message board portion of a sign shall not

exceed tbrty percent (40%) of the total sign area. It should be noted that, in Palatine, all of the

major commercial corridors allow these signs. Staff also contacted twelve surrounding communities

to see whether any others had special signage commercial corridors; none have such provisions.

According to the Engineering Division, the major commercial corridors are, except for a small

portion of East Oakton Street, under IDOT control, and the City does not track the posted speed

limits along them. Staff surveyed the corridors, therefore, and the results are illustrated on the

attached map. Briefly, the Mannheim Road corridor south of Touhy is posted at 40 mph; so is Rand

Road, Oakton west of Wolf and River Road below Touhy. The remainder of the corridors are

primarily posted at 35 mph, although portions of Miner Street are 30 mph. Of these arterial streets,

Mannheim and Rand represent the densest commercial corridors and have the types of businesses

most suited to a commercial overlay district. If the case were to be made for Mannheim Road,

however, the justification for Rand Road would presumably exist as well.

There are several policy issues involved here. Past City Councils have steadfastly resisted requests

to amend that portion of the current sign ordinance that deals with electronic signs, stating a fear of

proliferation of such signs leading to ‘visual clutter’ along community thoroughfares. This policy

can certainly change, it should he noted, and there is apparently Aldermanic support for relaxing the

restriction on the size of electronic components for the Royal Touch Car Wash. There is a danger in

trying to alter the zoning code in favor of one business, however, as such changes often serve as a

precedent that may have unintended consequences. By creating an overlay corridor for the portion

of Mannheirn Road in question, there would be little rationale in denying a similar request from

businesses in a similar corridor, such as Rand Road. The guiding principle is that the ability to say

‘no’ to an inappropriate zoning request cannot be compromised by the City having said ‘yes’ to a

prior request, no matter how appropriate or desirable it may seem.

The Community Development committee has discussed other methods of altering the electronicsignage standards, such as eliminating the current 20 square foot maximum size limit whileretaining the limit on the percentage of the total sign face that can contain an electronic component.

Such a modi lication would retain the proportionality of electronic signs, as the larger the total sign,the larger the size of the electronic portion. During the meeting of June 2’, one of the Aldenuensuggested that electronic components be allowed for up to 33% of the total sign area. In the case ofRoyal Touch, the company’s current large sign would allow it to have the electronic signcomponent requested if the 33% rule were to apply. The caveat in this case is that, although thechange may be intended only for this particular business, the impact could be far reaching, as itwould presumably apply to businesses across the city.

Recommendation: The Department of Community & Economic Development does not recommend the establishment of a commercial corridor signage overlay district along Mannheim Roadbetween Touhy and Higgins, as it would be difficult to restrict this type of district to a singlecommercial corridor within the community.

ATTACI IMENTS: Palatine Zoning Ordinance ExcerptCommercial Corridor Posted Speed Limit Map

)

PAl .ATINE ()flE OF ORDINANCES - APPENI)IX A — ZONING

(3) Any sign not ninintamed in compliance with these standards shall be removed by the

admimstratoi in accordance with this article

(i) E/,ri,mic ilhVsaç’e liuun/,i.

(I) Spccial Use Requicincnt. All Ide lionic TVIessige Boards shall obtain Special I Jse approval.

(2) location.a. l.lectronic message hoards shall be restricted to business uses in the billowing con idors:

Northwest Highway, Riuiit Road, Lake Cook Road, and J)undce Road.

I). A minimum three hundied (300) feet of lot frontage along an approved cortidor is required. In

the case of a lot with multiple frontages, the sign shall be placed along the approved corridor

frontage only.a. Electronic message boards shall be permitted only on single-user lots.

h. A maximum of one (I) electronic message board sign shall be permitted per zoning lot.

c. A minimum of five hundred (500) feet shall be maintained between electronic message board

signs.d. Electronic message boards shall be prohibited for all residential uses.

e. Electronic message boards shall be located on free standing signs only.

(3) Operation.a. All illumination shall be consistent in color.

h. The message shall not flash, scroll or scintillate. Illumination representing movement shall be

prohibited. Background illumination shall be prohibited.

c. Any message on an electronic message hoard shall be displayed for a minimum of sixty (60)

seconds.d. A maximum of four (4) different. messages may be displayed within atwenty-four(24) hour

l)el1( id.

(4) Size. The electronic message board portion of a sign shall not exceed forty percent ( l1Y of the total

sign area.(5) Existing electronic message boards. All electronic message board (copy change) signs granted Special

Use approval prior to the passing of this ordinance shall be permitted to repair or replace the sign

under the following conditions:

a. The sign shall substantially conform to plans approved by the Special Use Ordinance.

b. All sign operation regulations noted in Section 8.01 (3) shall apply

(Ord. #0-52-08, §11,4/21/08)

8.02. Permanent signage in residential districts.

(a) Freestanding signs. The following regulations shall apply to all freestanding signs in residential

districts.

(1) Subdivision identification signs.

a. Display. Lettering shall not be more than one foot in height and shall only indicate

the name of the subdivision.

h. Gioss swface area. No single subdivision identification sign shall exceed one

hundred (100) square feet in gross surface area.

c. Height. Acceptable height. shall be detemmined by the administrator.

d. Application.

ED

I•tI

I.,.

IL.’

CC•—Ca

tCt

•—NC©

Ti

U,

C

2..

U,

<.L

CC-)

8.‘

L”

8o.

I

a

/

0.

//

.LZ

r

/-.17

-u-’L.

0oU,

-

-ci--,

I—

‘—.

.-I

.—

—,

a..

..

a—a

a_

_i

a...

.3._t,_,

II

.2‘I-,

-

.2n

‘::—.

—_

..I.33

iJaa

..

1I

..

——

a-

-

-I

SSEINISflHIE1HSINL4Nfl

Unfinished Business Item #1

City of Des PlainesPublic Works and Engineering Department

/ 1 1111 Joseph Schwab Road, Des Plaines, iL600I6DES PLAINES Tel: 847-391-5464

ILLINOIS Fax: 847-297-6801

Date: .June 25, 2010

To: Jason Slowinski, cting City Manager

From: Katy Jlanzlik, ssi tant to the Director of Public Works and Engineering

cc: I’imothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering [ItJ

Re: Contract Extension -- Holiday Lighting & Decorations

Issue: At the June 7, 2010 City Council meeting, extension of the current HolidayLighting was considered and a request was made fur additional information on lightingoptions, such as longer-lasting lights.

Analysis: Staff requested a survey from the Northwest Municipal Conference andconsulted neighboring communities and its current lighting contractor, AutumnLandscaping, on options for light emitting diode (LED) holiday lights and year-roundlighting.

According to the attached NWMC survey, only Mount Prospect and Antioch hasexperience with year round lighting, including LED lights. Mount Prospect attemptedyear-round tree lights a few years ago and found the maintenance to be quite challenging,with lights falling from trees during inclement weather and difficulties pruning the trees.Since then, they have ruled out year-round lights, including LED lights. The Village ofAntioch has had a more positive experience with year-round LED lights for the past threeyears but noted the initial cost of LED’s was high. Antioch lights their downtown areaduring an extended winter holiday season and on weekends throughout the year.

According to Autumn Landscaping and other research, LED holiday lights cost 3 to 4times more than their incandescent counterparts and can reliably last about 3 years. ForDes Plaines, the upgraded lights would add approximately $40,000 to the holiday lightingexpenses. However, this cost could be offset within the three-year useful life by thesavings on unnecessary removal ($1 0,000/year) and reduced energy bills ($3,000/year)during the holiday season. If Des Plaines chose to keep the lights on during weekendsyear-round, the additional cost would be approximately $500.

The Northwest Municipal Conference survey further reports that no other neighboringcommunities have made the switch to LED lights for their holiday decor. Schauniburgand Arlington Heights, for example, have determined them to he cost-prohibitive.

of2June 25, 20 0Contract Extension - Holiday Lighting & Decorations

Besides additional maintenance, year-round LED tree lights also bring aesthetic changes.They cast a cooler light than the warmer incandescent lights. And their year-roundpresence would include the visible overhead wiring between trees and power sourcesthroughout the year.

As presented in the May 19, 2010 staff memorandum, Autumn Landscaping’s 2009holiday installations received positive feedback from City Council, residents and staff.Their work was thorough and completed by all given deadlines. The attached letter fromAutumn Landscaping confirms their interest in repeating the same work this holidayseason, at the 2009 original pricing.

Recommendation: Consistent with the June 7, 2010 memorandum, staff recommendsextending the Holiday Incandescent Lighting and Decorations contract for one year withAutumn Landscaping of 1532 S. Roselle Road, Schaumburg, Illinois 60193 at the 2009pricing. Funding for this contract is included in the 2010 TIF#l budget under 920560 —

Winter Decoration, in the amount of $52,400.

In order to further review LED lighting, staff could pilot an LED installation at ParoubekPark (Lee and Prairie) or other locations this year and consider LED lights in the 2011budget. This small display could be funded within the allocated 2010 TIF #1 budget.

Attachments:NWMC SurveyMay 19, 2010 MemorandumResolution

Win

ter

Hol

iday

Dec

ora

tion

Surv

eyJu

ne

2010

Con

trac

tor

inst

alle

dlig

hts

thre

eyea

rsaq

o

Inm

atur

etr

ees

alon

gtw

om

ajor

corr

idor

s.

Yes,

ugnt

son

ever

yni

ght

from

appr

ox.

Tha

nksg

ivin

gth

roug

hM

arch

;on

wee

ken

ds

and

holi

days

duri

ngth

ere

stof

the

year

.

Dus

tin

Nil

sen,

Pla

nnin

g84

7-39

5-94

62

Are

yo

ur

holi

day

How

do

esyour

What

isyour

dec

ora

tions

Does

your

com

mu

nit

yco

mm

unit

ydec

ora

teit

sco

mm

unit

y’s

inst

alle

dby

in-

leav

eholi

day

lig

hts

inst

reet

san

dm

unic

ipal

app

rox

imat

ean

nual

house

staf

fo

rby

Do

esyour

the

tree

sy

ear-

rou

nd

?If

bu

ild

ing

sfo

rth

ew

inte

rbudget

for

win

ter

aco

ntr

acto

r?If

aco

mm

unit

yu

seso

,ar

eth

eylit

ho

lid

ays

-tr

eeli

ghts

,h

oli

day

dec

ora

tions,

com

bin

atio

n,

how

LE

Dh

oli

day

thro

ughout

the

yea

ror

May

we

conta

ctgar

land,

ban

ner

s,la

rge

incl

ud

ing

inst

alla

tion

isth

atbro

ken

lights

?If

so,

how

only

duri

ng

the

win

ter

you

wit

hfo

llow

-M

unic

ipal

ity

Hol

iday

tree

,o

ther

?an

dre

moval

?dow

n?

or

wh

ere?

holi

day

month

s?up

qu

est

ion

s?

Ant

ioch

Liq

hts

intr

ees

$30,

000

in20

08

Som

ear

ele

ft,

abou

t1/

3W

ithin

-hou

sefo

rces

.N

oN

otye

t,co

stea

chye

ar.

The

yar

eno

tY

es.

Sco

ttS

hirl

eyA

rlin

gton

Hei

ghts

cont

ract

ing

atth

ispo

int.

Mat

eria

ls—

$10,

000.

In-h

ouse

only

.pr

ohib

itiv

e,lit

.84

7-36

8-58

00

Ban

ners

dow

nR

te.

14an

din

dow

ntow

nar

ea.

Hol

iday

tree

,lig

hts

&ga

rlan

don

$2,0

00.

No

inst

alla

tion

Gar

ydo

wnt

own

pole

s.an

dre

mov

alin

clud

ed.

In-h

ouse

.N

o.M

unic

ipal

buil

ding

sw

ithli

ghts

and

bow

san

dga

rlan

d.H

olid

aytr

eeV

illa

geH

all

oak

light

s,st

reet

ligh

tsw

ithtr

eetr

unks

are

ever

gre

enga

rlan

d,w

rapp

edw

ithL

ED

Yes

.B

rad

Fink

847.

Dee

rfie

ldba

nner

s.$5

,000

In-h

ouse

staf

f.lig

hts.

No.

719-

7462

Cham

ber

ofY

es.

Bre

ttK

rysk

aG

rays

lake

Tre

elig

hts.

$200

Com

mer

ce.

No.

No

847-

223-

8515

Yea

r-ro

und

light

sw

ere

atte

mpte

da

few

yea

rsC

ontr

acto

r,ag

oan

dw

ere

cons

ider

ing

doin

gpr

oble

mat

ic,

with

stra

nds

mor

ein

-hou

se,

hang

ing

dow

nfr

omtr

ees

leav

ing

only

tree

and

diff

icul

tym

aint

aini

ngM

ount

Pro

spec

tB

anne

rs,

light

s,ga

rlan

d$1

0pe

rst

rand

ligh

tsto

cont

ract

orN

o.tr

ees

whe

nnee

ded

.S

andy

Cla

rk,

PW

Win

ter

Hol

iday

Dec

ora

tion

Surv

eyJu

ne

2010

Are

your

holi

day

How

do

esyour

What

isy

ou

rdec

ora

tions

Does

your

com

mu

nit

yco

mm

unit

ydec

ora

teit

sco

mm

unit

y’s

inst

alle

dby

in-

leav

eholi

day

lights

inst

reets

and

munic

ipal

app

rox

imat

ean

nual

house

staf

fo

rby

Do

esyour

the

tree

sy

ear-

rou

nd

?If

bu

ild

ing

sfo

rth

ew

inte

rb

ud

get

for

win

ter

aco

ntr

acto

r?If

aco

mm

unit

yu

seso

,ar

eth

eylit

holi

day

s-tr

eeli

ghts

,h

oli

day

dec

ora

tions,

com

bin

atio

n,

how

LE

Dh

oli

day

thro

ughout

the

yea

ror

May

we

conta

ctg

arla

nd

,ban

ner

s,la

rge

incl

ud

ing

inst

alla

tion

isth

atb

rok

enli

ghts

?If

so,

how

only

du

rin

gth

ew

inte

ryou

wit

hfo

llow

-M

unic

ipal

ity

Hol

iday

tree

,oth

er?

and

rem

oval

?dow

n?

or

wher

e?h

oli

day

month

s?up

qu

est

ion

s?

The

Vill

age

ofN

iles

use

sva

riou

sha

ngin

gde

cora

tion

son

stre

etli

ghts

alon

gw

ithga

rlan

d.T

ree

light

sar

euse

don

tree

sat

vari

ous

mun

icip

alfa

citi

es.

Sta

ndal

one

dec

ora

tions

are

also

used

atva

riou

sm

unic

ipal

faci

liti

es.

The

budg

etfo

rdec

ora

tions

will

vary

bas

edup

onne

ed.

Whe

ndec

ora

tions

are

refu

rbis

hed

orre

plac

edad

diti

onal

fund

ing

isin

clud

ed.

For

the

curr

ent

budg

etye

aron

lyre

pla

cem

ent

$5,0

00is

budg

eted

for

ongo

ing

mai

nte

nan

cean

dre

pla

cem

ent

ofho

lida

ylig

hts

and

deco

rati

ons.

Dec

orat

ions

are

rem

oved

atth

een

dof

the

holi

day

seas

on

whe

nw

eath

erpe

rmit

s.N

iles

All

dec

ora

tions

are

inst

alle

dby

Vil

lage

staf

f.L

ED

light

sha

veno

tbe

enuse

dto

date

.Y

es.

Bob

Pila

t(8

47)

588-

7950

Just

star

ting

tolo

okS

om

ear

ele

ftup

all

year

into

them

onar

eas

long

.Ju

stle

fton

from

Yes

.R

icha

rd$4

,000

Inst

alla

tion

and

whe

repo

wer

isT

hank

sgiv

ing

until

just

Knu

dson

847-

784-

Nor

thfi

eld

Lig

hts,

Ban

ners

,G

arla

nd.

rem

oval

done

inho

use.

All

done

inho

use.

insu

ffic

ient

,af

ter

New

Yea

r.35

84

Wre

ath

son

gas

ligh

ts-

artif

icia

lot

her

item

son

N/A

.W

reat

hs

-in

-P

ark

Rid

gevo

lunt

eer

basi

s,0

hous

e.N

/A.

N/A

.

Dec

orat

edtr

eeou

tsid

eof

Pol

ice

Cen

ter.

Gar

den

Clu

bpr

ovid

esde

cora

tion

sS

om

ein

-hou

sefo

rtr

ees

atC

ityH

all

and

staf

fan

dY

es.

Pam

Arr

igon

iP

rosp

ect

Hei

ghts

Pol

ice

Dep

artm

ent.

0vo

lunt

eers

.N

o.84

7-39

8-60

70x2

02L

ight

s&

larg

etr

ee&

Yes

.D

onW

enze

l,R

ollin

gM

eado

ws

wre

aths

.$6

,000

In-h

ouse

.N

o.N

o.84

7-96

3-05

00

Win

ter

Hol

iday

Dec

ora

tion

Surv

eyJu

ne

2010

Are

your

holi

day

How

do

esyour

Wh

atis

your

dec

ora

tions

Do

esyour

com

mu

nit

yco

mm

unit

ydec

ora

teit

sco

mm

un

ity

’sin

stal

led

byin

-le

ave

holi

day

lig

hts

inst

reet

san

dm

unic

ipal

app

rox

imat

ean

nual

house

staf

fo

rby

Do

esyour

the

tree

sy

ear-

rou

nd

?If

bU

ildin

gs

for

the

win

ter

bu

dg

etfo

rw

inte

ra

contr

acto

r?If

aco

mm

unit

yuse

so,

are

they

lith

oli

day

s-tr

eeli

ghts

,h

oli

day

dec

ora

tions,

com

bin

atio

n,

ho

wL

ED

holi

day

thro

ughout

the

yea

ror

May

we

conta

ctgar

land,

ban

ner

s,la

rge

incl

ud

ing

inst

alla

tion

isth

atb

rok

enli

ghts

?If

so,

how

only

du

rin

gth

ew

inte

ryou

wit

hfo

llow

-M

unic

ipal

ity

Hol

iday

tree

,oth

er?

and

rem

oval

?dow

n?

or

wher

e?holi

day

month

s?up

qu

est

ion

s?•,

larg

eho

lida

ytr

eeat

the

vill

age

hall,

garl

and

and

light

pole

wre

aths

alon

gth

est

reet

sin

the

Lig

hts,

ban

ner

san

dC

BD

,w

inte

rsc

enes

onla

rge

holi

day

tree

ban

ner

sin

the

CB

D,

tree

byin

-hou

sest

aff.

light

spr

imar

ilyat

the

Gar

land

and

Yes

.S

teve

nvi

llag

eha

llgr

ound

san

dT

his

year

,$2

0,00

0.w

reat

hs

bya

No,

only

duri

ngth

eW

eins

tock

Sch

aum

burg

Tow

nS

quar

e.P

ast

year

s,$4

5,00

0.co

ntra

ctor

.N

o,to

oex

pens

ive,

holi

days

.84

7-92

3-66

00

Aco

mbi

nati

onof

all

ofth

eY

es.

Ken

Ken

nedy

Wil

met

teab

ove.

$33,

240

Con

trac

tor.

No.

No.

847-

853-

7581

CF City of Des PlainesPublic Works and Engineering Department

1111 Joseph Schwab RoadDES PLAINES Des Plaines, IL 60016

ILLINOIS Tel: 847-391-5464Fax: 847-297-6801

MEMORANDUM :

Date: May 19, 2010

To: Jason Slowinski, Acting City Manager

From: Katy I-Ianzlik, Assistant to the Director of Public Works and Engineering

Cc: Timothy P. Oakley, P.R. CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering

Re: Contract Extension — holiday Lighting & I)ecorations

Issue: On June 18, 2009, Public Works received competitive bids for the installation,maintenance and removal of Holiday Lighting and Decorations. Autumn Landscapingwas the successful low responsible bidder and was awarded a contract which allowed forannual renewals. Staff wishes to pursue a renewal for the 2010 holiday work.

Analysis: Autumn Landscaping’s holiday installations received positive feedback fromboth residents and staff last season. Their work was thorough and completed by all givendeadlines. The attached letter from Autumn Landscaping confirms their interest inrepeating the same work this holiday season, at the 2009 original pricing.

Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council extend the Holiday Lightingand Decorations contract with Autumn Landscaping of 1532 S. Roselle Road,Schaumburg, Illinois 60193 for an additional year at the 2009 pricing. Funding for thiscontract is included in the 2010 TIF#1 Budget, Winter I)ecorations, in the amount of$52,400.

Attachments:Letter from Autumn LandscapingPurchase Order2009 Bid TabulationResolution

utumnLANDSCAPING &MAINTENANCE, INC.

May 14, 2010

Katy HanslickCity of Des Plaines1420 Miner St.Des Plaines, IL 60016

RE: HOLIDAY LIGHTING CONTRACT

Katy:

Autumn Landscaping, Inc. proposes to extend the same holiday lighting services as spelled outand performed in 2009/2010 contract with the City of Des Plaines for the same sum of$52,400.00, for one additional year; 2010/2011 holiday lighting season.

Please call my office if you have any questions or if you would like to go over any details.

We thank you for the opportunity to bid this project again and we look forward to working withyou.

Sincerely,AUTUMN LANDSCAPING, INC.

aelP.CloPresident

MPC/cd

1532 S. Roselle Road• Schaumburg, IlUnois 60193 • (630) 893-4100 • Fax: (630) 893-4175

CITY OF DES PLAINES1420 MINER STREET

DES PLAIN ES, ILLINOIS 60016TELEPHONE: (847) 391-5300

PURCHASE ORDER

ORC. NO. AC(’Ot NI’ NO. PRoJECT (‘OI)E DEPT / DIVISION VENI)OR NO. PL R(’IIASE ORDER NO.

20SF 920560 Public Works PW 10-2

VENI)OR NA,’IF,

AT[N

AL)L)RESS

Autumn I :nclscaping, Inc.

Mike Cloonan

1532 S. Roselle Road

Schaumhurg, IL 60193

SHIPTO

Public Works and [ngincering

I I I I Joseph J. Schwab Road

CI1’\, S1A’I’E, ZIP

QIANI1TY ITEM / DESCRIPTION L NIT EXTE’DEI)COST

I loliday Lighting and Decoration For the 2010 holiday season 52,400.00 52,400.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

St B-IOTA L 52,400.00

SHIPPING / OTHER

IOTA [. $52,400.00

DATE REQUESTED BY DEPARTMENT HEAD FINANCE DIRECTOR (‘IT MANAGER

5/17/10 Katy Hanzlik

CITY OF

35I

DES PLAINESILLINOIS

PAGE 1 OF 2ltctIe 01/01/09

I.

.)

I,I l(’I

VENI)OR NAME

ADDRESS

$5240O.00

Autumn Landscaping

1532 S. Roselle Road

( ITY, S1A’I’E, ZiP Schauniburg. IL 60193-4913

PRI (‘l

CON FACT PERSON

P1 lONE

FAX

EMAIL

CONTACT PERSON

PHONE

FAX

Mike Cloonan

630-893-4100

VENDOR SECTION

3.

VENDOR NAME

A[)DRESS

CitY. StAlE. ZIP

PRICE

VENDOR NAME

AI)DRESS

CITY, STATE, ZIP

EMAIL

CONTACT PERSON

PHONE

FAX

EMAIL

THIS PURCHASE AND OTHER PROJECT COSTS ARE EXPECTED TO REMAIN WITHIN THE NOBUDGET: (CHECK BOX)

PLEASE MARK ALL BOXES BELOW THAT APPLV TOTHLS PURCHASE:

APPROVAL OF LOWES 1’ RESPONSIBLE I31DDER PROFESSIONAl, SERVI(LS CONSI 1, lING

EMERGENCY PURCHASE E SOLE SOI. RCE St PPI.IFR

EQUIPMENI’ SFANl)AR[)It HON FE:cIINICAI, NA FLRE OF II EMS MAKES C0MPI: ITFION IMIN)SSIBLE

JOINt (IOVFRNMLN1 I’IJRCI IASING PROGRAM 01 HER (I’[EASE EXPLAIN BI’ I OW)

EXPLANATION: (‘oniraci e\rension

FOR PURCHASES OVER $10,000

A F( )RMAI REQt EST FOR A RESOI I FION HAS BEEN StBM FilEt) [0 I i (iAl : )CF IECK lit )X YES NOI IllS HEM I 1..5 KiLN P1 ACII) ON CONSENT AGENDA: (CHECK BOX) YES NO

PAGE 2 OF 2 Iifluse UI )I,O)

V ENDORRECOMMENDED

0 [‘FIER PROJECT COSTS

Autumn Landscaping ITIAL AMO[JNIBUDGETED

ON(IOING OPERA I 1N((‘OS I’S

$52,400.00

Bid Opening: 300 P.M. -June 18 2009

RECAP 01 IilDS

INSTALLATION. MAINTENANCE & REMOVAL OF

2009 HOLIDAY LIGHTING AND DECORATIONS

BIDDER NAME AND ADDRESS TOTAL BID PRICE

The UC Group Base Bid 344,619.00

P.O. Box 127 Light Poles S 2,800.00

Clarendon Hills, IL 60514 Train Station Lighting $ 232000Total Combined Bid $49,939.00

Autumn Landscaping Base Bid $42,600.00

1532 S. Roselic Road Light Poles 3 5,900.00

Schaumburg, IL 60193 Train Station Lighting $ 3.900.4)0

Total Combined Bid $52,400.00

Landscape Concepts Management Base Bid $41 ,62&60

31745 N. Alleghany Road Light Poles $11,125.00

Giayslake, IL 60030 Train Station Lighting $ 673.44)Total Combined Bid $53,427.00

Temple Display Base Bid $54,435.00

114C Kirkl2nd Centre Light Poles $ 3,500.00

Oswego, IL 60543 Tram Station Lighting $ 3.000,00Total Combined Bid $60,935.00

Sure Light Sign Company Base Bid $77,948.00

1225 Bowes Road Light Poles $19,966.00

Elgin, IL 60123 Train Station Lighting $ 2?806.0OTotal Combined Bid 100,720.00

Five (5) responses received from twenty-one (21) vendors who were mailed or picked up

specifications.

Nancy PetersonDeputy City Clerk

CITY OF DES PLAINES

RESOLUTION R - 72 10

A RESOLUTION EXTENDING AUTHORIZATION TOAUTUMN LANDSCAPING, INC. FOR THEINSTALLATION OF HOLIDAY DECORATIONSTHROUGHOUT THE DOWNTOWN AREA OF DESPLAINES AT A COST NOT TO EXCEED $52,400.00.


WHEREAS, on July 6, 2009, by Resolution R-1 10-09, the City Council accepted thelowest responsible bid for installation of holiday decorations throughout the downtown area ofDes Plaines fi-om Autumn Landscaping, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $52,400.00; and

WHEREAS, Autumn Landscaping, Inc.’s holiday decorations received positivefeedback from residents and City Staff last season and they have agreed to an extension of the2009 pricing; and

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to waive the purchasing policies andguidelines in the City Code to authorize a one year extension to Autumn Landscaping, Inc. forthe installation of holiday lighting and decorations throughout the downtown area of Des Plainesand to authorize the Director of Finance to issue payment to Autumn Landscaping, Inc. for theinstallation of holiday lighting and decorations in an amount not to exceed $52,400.00





SECTION 2: That in the best interest of the City, the City Council hereby waives the

purchasing policies and guidelines in the City Code and authorizes the Acting City Manager to

execute all documents necessary to authorize Autumn Landscaping, Inc. to install holiday

lighting and decorations throughout the downtown area of Des Plaines at Autumn Landscaping,

Inc.’s 2009 pricing.


designee, to issue payment to Autumn Landscaping, Inc., 1532 S. Rosellc Road, Schaurnburg,

Illinois 60193, for the installation of holiday lighting and decorations throughout the downtown

area of Des Plaines in an amount not to exceed $52,400.00.

SECTION 4: That this Resolution shall he in full force and effect from and after its


PASSED this day of__________________ , 2010.

APPROVEDthis

____

dayof ,2010.


MAYOR



Lcgal\Rcs\20 I 0\Auturnn Landscaping lice Lighting 2010

2

U U City Council A2enda Tuesday, July 6, 2010 - Des Plaines

Documents

Transcript of U U City Council A2enda Tuesday, July 6, 2010 - Des Plaines