Thermodynamics of adsorption of cerium on lead dioxide
-
Upload
ferdowsimashad -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Thermodynamics of adsorption of cerium on lead dioxide
J.RADIOANAL.NUCL.CHEM.,LETTERS 186 (I) 63-74 (1994)
THERMODYNAMICS OF ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
M. Afzal*, H. Ahmad, M. Saleem, S.M. Hasany**
Department of Chemistry, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
**Nuclear Chemistry Division, PINSTECH, Nilore, Islamabad, Pakistan
Received 17 May 1993 Accepted 31 May 1993
Adsorption of cerium on lead dioxide from aqueous solutions has been studied as a function of shaking time, amount of adsorb- ent, pH, concentration of the adsorSate and temperature. The adsorption process is endothermic and the distribution coeffi- cient (K D) increases with increasing tem- perature. The data fit very well the Lang- muir, Freundlich, and Dubinin-Raduskevich Isotherms and their corresponding constants were Calculated. AH ~ and AS ~ were calculat- ed from the slope and intercept of plots of ink D vs. I/T. AG ~ values decreases with in- creasing temperature, showing that the ad- sorption of Ce(III) is more favorable at high temperature. The endothermacity of the adsorption process is discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Due to the uncontrolled release of heavy metals and
radionuclides into surface and sea water, the monitor-
ing of different pollutants in water systems has in-
*Author for correspondence.
63 Elsevier Sequoia S. A., Lausanne
Akaddmial Kiadd, Budapest
AFZAL et al.: ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
creased in recent years. As these pollutants are within
the concentration range of microamounts or traces, a
preconcentration step is usually needed before their
instrumental determination. Cerium is one of the impor-
tant fission products, so its separation/removal is es-
sential. Preconcentration/separation procedures based
on adsorption phenomena are important in analytical and
radiochemistry of trace elements, because of their sim-
plicity, efficiency and selectivity. The adsorption of
cerium on metal oxides has been reviewed in our earlier
investigations of its adsorption on lead I and manganese
dioxides 2. This study was undertaken in order to evalu-
ate the importance of lead dioxide for scavenging in
natural water or in waste water treatments. Here we re-
port the results of our investigations on the adsorp-
tion of cerium on lead dioxide from aqueous solutions
at various temperatures.
EXPERIMENTAL
The surface area, pore parameters and preparation of
buffer solutions of different pHs were reported earlier I.
All the solutions were made from doubly distilled de-
ionized water and analytical reagents. The measurement
of K D was carried out at (273-303) • 0.3 K and the error
in most cases was around •
To check the dissolution of lead dioxide, 50 mg was
shaken with 100 cm 3 buffer solutions of different pHs
for 30 min separately. The solution was then filtered
through a 0.2 ~m pore size sinter (ACE Bectan Dickenson
& Co. U.S.A.). The amount of lead due to dissolution
was then measured colorimetrically 3-5. The solubility
of the oxide was (0.93, 0.81, 0.64, 0.008, 0.005,
64
AFZAL et al.: ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
0.002, 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, 0.2) mg/100 cm 3 for pHI to
10, respectively. The high solubility observed at pH
I-3 may be due to the fact that these solutions were
made by mixing 0.1 mol dm -3 HCl and KCI solutions and
lead dioxide is sparingly soluble in dil. HCI 6. The
low solubility at pH 4 to 7 may be due to the fact that
the oxide is not dissolved in and does not react with
any component of these buffer solutions. The increase
in solubility at pH 8 to 10 may be due to the reaction
of lead dioxide with ammonium chloride present in these
buffers 7 .
The preparation of cerium tracer, the experimental
techniques used and the procedure for adsorption meas-
urement, computation of distribution coefficient and
percent adsorption are given in detail elsewhere I-3'8
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Experiments were conducted to determined the optimum
amount of oxide and shaking time for the adsorption of
cerium on lead dioxide and were found to be 50 mg and
less than 10 min, respectively, as reported earlier I'3
Adsorption dynamics were determined using various
rate-controlling steps. The study of adsorption dynamics
is quite significant in waste water treatment, as it
describes the solute uptake rate, which in turn controls
the residence time of the adsorbate uptake at the solid/
solution interface. The adsorption of cerium from solu-
tion to solid phase can be considered as a reversible
reaction with an equilibrium between two phases 9.
S + Ce ' S-Ce ( 1 )
65
AFZAL et al.: ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
The overall rate constant k', and rate constants for
adsorption (kl) and desorption (k 2) of this reaction
were calculated using the equations of Ref. (10) and
were found to be 0.49, 0.48799 and 2.01x10 -3 min -I , re-
spectively. The rate constant of intraparticle trans-
port (k~) was calculated using the equation of Weber --I and Moris 11 and was found to be 3.92x10 -5 mmol g
-i/2 min
The adsorption of cerium on lead dioxide was first
measured as a function of pHI . No appreciable adsorp-
tion has been observed up to pH 2. The distribution
coefficient increases with increasing pH up to 6, where
maximal adsorption is achieved 12. Thus a buffer of pH
6 was selected for all further studies I-3. Similar ob-
servation was also reported by Shiao 13, for the adsorp-
tion of cobalt on AI203. Based on hydrolysis constants 14
of cerium, up to pH 5, no hydrolysis take places and
all the cerium would be present as Ce 3+ ions. As the pH
increases above 5, hydrolysis of cerium becomes pre-
dominant, resulting in a variety of hydrolyzed species
and the adsorption of cerium starts decreasing again.
Cerium may be present as hydrolyzed ions of varying com-
position under different pH conditions in solution. The
percentages of these species, namely Ce 3+ Ce(OH) 2+ I l
Ce(OH)+ 2' Ce(OH)3 and Ce(OH)4 at different pHs have been I
estimated using the values of K I, K 2, K 3, and K 4 as
10 - 8 " 1 , 10 - 8 . 2 , 10 - 9 . 7 a n d 1 0 - 1 2 ~ r e s p e c t i v e l y , a n d a r e
given in Table I.
The adsorption isotherms of cerium at different tem-
peratures 15 were obtained by plotting the amount ad-
sorbed (mmol.g -I) vs. equilibrium concentration of cerium
in solution as shown in Fig. 1; they followed the L2 16 type of Giles classification The extent of adsorption
66
AFZAL et al.: ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
,~ 20
E_ ~6 X
o 313 o 323
do ' 100 150
C.e, pmol - dm -3
Fig. I. Adsorption isotherm of cerium on lead dioxide at different temperatures
TABLE I
Percent of hydrolyzed species of cerium formed
pH Ce 3+ Ce (OH) 2+ Ce (OH) + 2 Ce (OH) 3 Ce (OH) 4
6 99.21 00.79 - - -
7 92.81 06.76 0.43 - -
8 55.73 27.14 17.10 00.03 -
9 11.18 12.15 63.92 12.73 0.02
10 01.24 01.54 32.46 64.12 0.64
is related to Langmuir 17, Freundlich 18 and Dubinin-
Raduskevich 19 isotherms.
The data were fitted with the Langmuir adsorption
isotherm in the concentration range of 7.5 x 10 -6 to
1 x 10 -4 mol dm -3. From the slope and intercept of the
67
AFZAL et al.: ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
6
3 I o 313 o 323
I I I I 02 0.4 0.6 0,8 1.0
Ce, prno[ �9 drn "3
Fig. 2. Langmuir-type adsorption isotherm of cerium on lead dioxide at different temperatures
linear plots of Ce/X vs. C e (Fig. 2) at different tem- -I peratures the value of V (12 to 19) • 0.5 mmol g and
m constant B (1.43 to 1.42) • dm 3 ~mol -I were calcu-
lated. The V m value increases with increasing tempera-
ture, indicating the endothermicity of adsorption
process. The data follow Freundlich as well as D,R iso-
therm in the whole concentration range studied (7.5
x 10 -6 to I x 10 -3 mol dm -3) for different temperatures
as shown in Figs 3 and 4. The Freundlich constants A
(I to 28) • 0.65 mol g-1 and N (0.5 to 0.7) + 0.01,
were computed from the slope and intercept of the plots
as shown in Fig. 3. These values increase With increas-
ing temperature. N may be related to the nature and
strength of adsorption forces involved. The higher frac-
tional value of N signifies that strong adsorptive
forces are operative on the oxide surface. However, the
higher values of A signify the higher affinity of cerium
68
AFZAL et al.: ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
Fi~. .
Ig Ce - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 _
_ _ .
�9 313 �9 323
X
- 5 9
Freundlich-type adsorption isotherm of cerium on lead dioxide at different temperatures
Fig.
s
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 " 2 t I I
Temp, K " 293 �9 303
~ " % m ~ n 313
-6 " ~ ~
-8
c -10
4. Dubinin-Radushkevich-type adsorption isotherm of cerium on lead dioxide at different tempera- tures
69
AFZAL et al.: ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
for lead dioxide. The D-R parameter X (79 to 278)• 0.43 m
mmol g-1 further confirmed that with increasing tempera-
ture t~e adsorption of cerium on lead dioxide is more
favorable. The sorption free energy E (11.8 to 12.1) •
0.2 kJ mo1-1 is in the energy range of ion exchange re-
actions, in good agreement with our previous observa-
tion of manganese adsorption on lead dioxide 3 and other
references therein.
The dependence of cerium adsorption on temperature
was also investigated. The concentration was varied
between 7.5 x 10 -6 and I x 10 -3 mol dm -3 and the tem-
perature was varied between 293 to 323 • 0.3 K in steps
of 10 K, while other parameters were kept constant. The
distribution coefficient increases with increasing tem-
perature, which may be due to a negative temperature
coefficient or to a steep simultaneous decrease of the
real adsorption of solvent 20-25. Belousov and Kolobov 26
have studied the adsorption of cerium on active manga-
nese dioxide, and have found that adsorption of cerium
increases with increasing temperature and with decreas-
ing cerium concentration.
The values of AH ~ and AS ~ were calculated from the
slopes and intercept of the linear variation of In K D
vs. I/T, Figs 5 and 6. The thermodynamic parameters are
given in Table 2. Both the positive values of AH ~ and
decrease in the values of AS ~ with increasing tempera-
ture show that the reaction is more favorable at high
temperature. One possible explanation of the endo-
thermacity of heats of adsorption is the well known
fact that cerium ions are well solvated in water. In
order for the ions to be adsorbed, they have to lose
part of their hydration shell. This dehydrab• process
of the ions requires energy. We have assumed that this
dehydration supersedes the exothermacity of the ion
7O
AFZAL et al.: ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
I 2 9.5~
90
Conc .:
�9 l~ox lo-_ 5 ~
�9 s ~ 16 -s ~. I o ;~x~-~ ~ I �9 1.Ox 10 -4 ~ J
8s I I J I �9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5
l IT , x lO "3 K -1
Fig. 5. Plot of in K D vs. I/T for cerium adsorption on lead dioxide (conc. 7.5 x 10-6 to I x 10 -4 mol dm-3)
~ 9 ~
7 i i
6
I 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5
I/T ,xi0"3 K -I
Fig. 6. Plot of in K D vs. I/T for cerium adsorption on lead dioxide (conc. 2.5 x 10 -4 to I x 10 -3 tool dm -3 )
71
AF'ZAL et al.: ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
TABLE 2
Thermodynamicparameters of cerium adsorption on lead dioxide
-AG ~ , kJ mol -I
ConcentrationA AH O AS O T, K
mol dm "3 kJ mol -I J Kmol -I 293 303 313 323
7.5 x 10 -6 7.304 102.i40 22.62 23.64 24.67 25.69
1.0 x 10 -5 7.550 105.927 23.49 24.55 25.61 26.67
2.5 x 10 -5 8.894 107.257 22.53 23.61 24;.68 223.61
5.0 x 10 -5 11.713 112.158~ 21 15 22,27 23.39 24.51
-5 7.5 x 10 14.588 120.303 20.66 21.86 23.07 24.27
1.0 x 10 -4 17.927 128.611 19.76 21.04 22'33 23.61
getting attached to the surface. The implicit assump-
tion here is that on adsorption the environment of the
metal ion is less aqueous than it is in the dissolved
state. In summary, we may say that the removal of water
from the ion is essentially an endothermic process and
it appears that endothermicity of the desolvation
process exceeds that of the heat of adsorption to a con-
siderable extent. The free energy charge is negative as
expected for a spontaneous process. The rise in -AG ~
with increasing temperature shows that the adsorption
of these metal ions on lead dioxide become favorable at
high temperature. The overall adsorption process is
endothermic because of the positive entropy change.
72
AFZAL et al.: ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
REFERENCES
I. M. Afzal, S.M. Hasany, H. Ahmad, F. Mahmood, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 170 (1993) 309.
2. S.M. Hasany, M.H. Chaudhary, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 111 (1987) 199.
3. H. Ahmad, M. Afzal, S.M. Hasany, F. Mahmood, Col- loids and Surfaces (1993) (in press).
4. J.B. Basset, R.C. Denney, G.H. Jeffery, J. Mendham, Vogel's Text Book of Quantitative Inorganic Analy- sis, 4th ed., English Language Book Company and Longman, London, 1978, p. 746.
5. M.R. Jan, A. Hussain, Proc. Natl. Chem. Conf(I) (1989) 226. --
6. C.R. Wheast, CRC Handbook of Physics and Chemistry, 65th ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1984, 122.
7. A.I. Irshova, Ya.I. Ivashenster, V.A. Konakova, Izv. Vyssh, Uchebn, Zaved. Isvetn, Metall., 4 (1978) 48.
8. S.M. Hasany, M.H. Chaudhary, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 84 (1984) 247.
9. A.K. Bhallachaya, C. Venkobchar, J. Env. Eng. ASCE, 110 (1982) 110.
10. A.K. Singh, D.P. Singh, K.K. Panaday, V.N. Singh, J. Chem. Techn. Biotechnol., 42 (1988) 39.
11. W.J. Weber, J.C. Morris, J. San. En<: Div. ASCE, 89(SA2) (1963) 31.
12 H. Kawano, Y. Nakai, T. Matsuda, T. Nagai, Talanta, 33 (I 986) 191.
13. S.Y. Shaio, Y. Egozy, R.E. Meyer, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 43 (1981) 3309.
14. J. Kragton, Atlas of Metal-Ligand Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, Ellis Harwood, Chichester, 1978, p. 160.
15. R. Qadeer, J. Hanif, M. Saleem, M. Afzal, J. Radio- anal. Nucl. Chem., Lett., 165 (1992) 243.
73
Ab-ZAL et al.: ADSORPTION OF CERIUM ON LEAD DIOXIDE
16. C.N. Giles, T.H. Macewan, S.N. Nakhwa, D. Smith, J. Chem. Soc., (1960) 3970.
17. K.Ko Panaday, G. Parasad, J. Chem. Techn. Biotech- nol., 34A (1984) 367.
18. G.H. Blot, Soil Chemistry, Physiochemical Model, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1979, p. 118.
19. M.M. Dubinin, L.H.V. Raduskevich, Proc. Acad. phys. Chem. USSR., 55 (1947) 331.
20. M. Saleem, M. Afzal, R. Qadeer, J. Hanif, Sepn. Sci. Technol., 27 (1992) 239.
21. R. Qadeer, J. Hanif, M. Saleem, M. Afzal, J. Radio- anal. Nucl. Chem., 157 (1992) 321.
22. R. Qadeer, J. Hanif, M. Saleem, M. Afzal, J. Radio- anal. Nucl. Chem., 159 (1992) 155.
23. R. Qadeer, J. Hanif, M. Saleem, M. Afzal, Colloid Polym. Sci., 271 (1993) 83.
24. R. Qadeer, J. Hanif, M. Saleem, M. Afzal, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun., 57 (1992) 1021.
25. P.K. Butt, M. Afzal, H. Ahmad, N.U. Rahim, Sci. Int., 4 (1992) 15.
w ~
26. G.R. Doshi, T.M. Krishnamorty, V.N. Sastry, T.P. Sharma, Ind. J. Chem., 11 (1973) 458.
74