Structural adoption of open data in governmental organisations
Transcript of Structural adoption of open data in governmental organisations
‘structural adoption of open data in governmental organisations’
Province of South-HollandBart Spée | senior GEO-IT specialist
Municipality of The HagueEd Visser | senior consultant GEO information
Antoine Gribnau | information manager GEO systems
The Hague University of Applied SciencesBert Mulder | associate professor
Martijn Hartog | researcher | [email protected]
‘government of the future’
two research programmesProvince of South HollandMunicipality of The Hague
open and transparent government
‘Open Data’‘Transparency’
structural and practical adoption of open data
several explorations in 2012 and 2013key expert interviews
two large governmental organizationsMunicipality of The Hague, 500.000 inhabitants
Province of South Holland, 3.5 million people, 2.900 km2
landscape of ‘some’ developments
InternationalOpen Government PartnershipOpen Government DataPublic Sector InformationINSPIRELinked DataOpen Spending
NationalData Protection ActFreedom of Information ActInformation societyNetworked societyHackatons
ChallengesPublication process Open data
portals and storesChanging collaborations Trust and transparency (e.g. private/public)
Legal issues Guidelines, policy
Mobile phone or web Participation applications Sustainable solutions Accessibility and reliability
examples of conflict of interest
accountable economical and societal effects (e.g. Meijer, 2013; Pollock, 2009; Halonen, 2012)Vs.
‘Why should I open up or publish my data’?
perceiving openness or transparency by governmental bodies (e.g. Henninger, 2013; Halonen, 2012)Vs.
‘Is this even part of my job?’
effects on citizen empowerment and government processes (e.g. Meijer, 2013; O’Hara, 2012; Paled, 2013)
Vs.‘How should data be published and how much does it costs?’
Lessons learned 1/2
situation:internal procedures are inefficiently cluttered
immediate ‘data hunt’ is an effective supplier of data sets and applicationsopening up data is not a natural process
solution:standardized formats for up-to-date, automatically reachable data sets are a necessity
attitude and dissemination of open data policy by management is a must
invest in the quality, quantity and sustainability of data sets
create awareness and necessity of opening data by source owners and holders
Lessons learned 2/2
situationdespite ‘Open Data, unless’ policy still a lot of cold feet
explaining and convincing source holders is very time consumingan effective central open data system can reduce costs
solutionharmonize definitions and uniform terms of usage
adapt open data policy into information architecture, conditions of information for ICT’s
stimulate a creative and pro-active approach
activate an open data store with up-to-date data and a platform
conclusions
Policycentral systems of open data accessibility generates success and can even reduce costs
corporate policy is necessary for stimulation and active marketing
Culturerudimentary questions prevail the common practice
organizational culture is elementary as a structural base for open data
Processthinking in technical infrastructures and automated data helps
thematic approach of data generates clarity connecting data and users
bring open data to the front of the internal processes
Coordinationcreate a central position for legal and technical open data representatives
next necessary steps
developing more knowledge and experiences with best practices
pragmatic model to adapt open data into governmental bodies
‘structural adoption of open data in governmental organisations’
Province of South-HollandBart Spée | senior GEO-IT specialist
Municipality of The HagueEd Visser | senior consultant GEO information
Antoine Gribnau | information manager GEO systems
The Hague University of Applied SciencesBert Mulder | associate professor
Martijn Hartog | researcher | [email protected]