Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of...

21

Transcript of Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of...

Page 1: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 2: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 3: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 4: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 5: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 6: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 7: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 8: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 9: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 10: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 11: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 12: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 13: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 14: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 15: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 16: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 17: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 18: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 19: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 20: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions
Page 21: Reasoning by Consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions

Human Reasoning v Mechanistic Reasoning: The Evidence-Based Argument for Lucas' Goedelian Thesis

Human Reasoning v Mechanistic Reasoning: The Evidence-Based Argument for Lucas' Goedelian Thesis

Reasoning with Reasoning. Using Faceted Browsers to Find Meaning in Linked Data

Reasoning with Reasoning. Using Faceted Browsers to Find Meaning in Linked Data

EFFICIENT DEFEASIBLE REASONING SYSTEMS

EFFICIENT DEFEASIBLE REASONING SYSTEMS

Argumentation and Persuasion in the Cognitive Coherence Theory

Argumentation and Persuasion in the Cognitive Coherence Theory

Support in abstract argumentation

Support in abstract argumentation

On a Computational Argumentation Framework for Agent Societies

On a Computational Argumentation Framework for Agent Societies

Argumentation-Based Proof Procedures for Credulous and Sceptical Non-monotonic Reasoning

Argumentation-Based Proof Procedures for Credulous and Sceptical Non-monotonic Reasoning

Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic* - University of ...

Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic* - University of ...

Pragmatic Logic and the Study of Argumentation

Pragmatic Logic and the Study of Argumentation

Aristotle and Modern Argumentation Theory

Aristotle and Modern Argumentation Theory

analytical reasoning - PANKAJ GANDHI'S ACADEMY

analytical reasoning - PANKAJ GANDHI'S ACADEMY

Argumentation Theory for Decision Support in Health-Care

Argumentation Theory for Decision Support in Health-Care

correlation study of students' scientific argumentation, critical ...

correlation study of students' scientific argumentation, critical ...

Institutional preconditions for strategic maneuvering in health brochures. COGENCY Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation Vol. 5 - No. 2 - Summer 2013

Institutional preconditions for strategic maneuvering in health brochures. COGENCY Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation Vol. 5 - No. 2 - Summer 2013

SAT Reasoning - Entrytest.com

SAT Reasoning - Entrytest.com

CRITICAL REASONING, WRITING & PRESENTATION

CRITICAL REASONING, WRITING & PRESENTATION

Asymptotic Reasoning - Computational Logic

Asymptotic Reasoning - Computational Logic

Modeling Changes in View in Argumentation - ACL Anthology

Modeling Changes in View in Argumentation - ACL Anthology

Social reasoning

Social reasoning

CASE-BASED REASONING - QSpace

CASE-BASED REASONING - QSpace