Queen Anne's County

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SCHEDULETUESDAY, JUNE 22, 2021

LEGISLATIVE DAY

o comply with the Governor ’s proclamation declaring a state of emergency in Maryland, to minimize the person-to-person spread of COVID-19, we are providing remote options for citizens to watch County Commissioner meetings. These meetings are streamed live on our QAC Website at qac.org/live and broadcasted on QACTV ’s Television channel on

Atlantic Broadband cable channel 7 or in HD 507.

Press and Public Comments will be accepted in person or via email and we will read them during the Press & Public Comment time on the agenda. Please send your email

comments to [email protected] or live comments by going to https://www.qac.org/1430/Public-Comment-During-Live-County-Meetin We will accept comments up until the end of the meeting. Citizens are asked to submit all other written testimony

to the County Commissioners by mail at 107 N. Liberty Street, Centreville, MD 21617 or by email at [email protected]

Thank you for your cooperation and understanding.

CLOSED SESSION

5:00 p.m. Under Section 3-305(b) (1) of the General Prevision

Article

"Boards & Commissions"

CALL TO ORDER

5:30 p.m. Call to Order,

Pledge of Allegiance,

Moment of Silence,

Approval of Agenda

Accept County Commissioners’ Minutes

- Regular Minutes – June 8, 2021

Press and Public Comments**

NEW BUSINESS

5:45 p.m. Mr. Todd R. Mohn, PE, County Administrator

“Presentation of Documents for Signatures and

Weekly Correspondence”

Action

1. SKI Phase 2 – Vacant Properties – Rendering of Benefits Assessment

2. SKI Phase 1 – Improved Properties – Rendering of Benefits Assessment

3. Backup 9-1-1 Center Furniture from Watson Consoles

4. Extension Request – citizen sponsored text amendment #21-04

5. On-call Airport Consultant Services

6. FY2022 Impact Fee Schedule

7. Rural Legacy – Agreement of Sale & Project Agreement

8. MACo – Dues and assessments for FY22

9. BOE Annual Budget Certification Statement

10. Budget Amendment CC-42 – Sheriff’s Office

11. Budget Amendment CC-43 – Tourism Grant Fund

12. Budget Amendment CC-44 – DPW Storage Bldg Renovation

13. Budget Amendment CC-45 – Health Department

06.22.2021Action.pdf06.22.2021Coorespondence.pdf

PRESENTATIONS

6:00 p.m. Mr. Jim Calao, Administrative Officer, Plant

Protection and Weed Management, Maryland

Department of Agriculture

Mr. Dave MacGlashan, Chief Property Manager

"Queen Anne’s County Weed Control Advisory

Committee"

PUBLIC HEARINGS

6:10 p.m. Public Hearing

County Ordinance 21-05 - the Expansion of the Kent

Narrows Commercial Management and Waterfront

Improvement District Established Under Article IV of

Chapter 5 of the Code of Public Local Laws of

Queen Anne’s County


County Ordinance 21-02 - Major and Minor

Multifamily Dwellings and Nonresidential Height

Requirements in the Urban Commercial (UC) Zoning

District in Queen Anne’s County, Maryland


County Ordinance 21-03 - Self-Storage Uses in the

Town Center (TC) Zoning District in Queen Anne’s

County, Maryland

6:15 p.m. Press and Public Comments**

6:20 p.m. Commissioner’s Roundtable

ORD 21-05.PdfORD 21-02.PdfORD 21-03.Pdf

* Please note the scheduled times are subject to change, except for public hearings.

PUBLIC COMMENT SIGN-IN SHEET WILL BE AVAILABLE 1 HOUR PRIOR

TO THE MEETING.

**Press and Public Comment at the beginning of the meeting will last 15 minutes.

Additional time will be available at the end of the meeting for anyone wishing to

speak. Comments are limited to 3 minutes in length. Comments longer than 3

minutes must be submitted in writing. PRESS AND PUBLIC COMMENT SIGN-IN

SHEET WILL BE AVAILABLE 1 HOUR PRIOR TO THE MEETING.

***Part of the meeting may be closed to the Public in accordance to the Open

Meetings Act procedures.

Three or more of the County Commissioners may be attending the following events in the next

few weeks:

June 25 EDC and TTAC - Branding Presentation

June 30 YMCA Groundbreaking

1.

2.

3.

Documents:

4.

5.

Documents:

https://videoplayer.telvue.com/player/AbfNhigIqnG-4roGCxaFupXEKfme9dfT/playlists/5032/stream/491?autostart=true&showtabssearch=true&fullscreen=false

https://www.qac.org/

https://qac.org/410/QACTVCOM

mailto:


LEGISLATIVE DAY







CLOSED SESSION


Article


CALL TO ORDER



Moment of Silence,

Approval of Agenda




NEW BUSINESS




Action















PRESENTATIONS






Committee"

PUBLIC HEARINGS















County, Maryland






TO THE MEETING.









few weeks:



1.

2.

3.

Documents:

4.

5.

Documents:


LEGISLATIVE DAY







CLOSED SESSION


Article


CALL TO ORDER



Moment of Silence,

Approval of Agenda




NEW BUSINESS




Action















PRESENTATIONS






Committee"

PUBLIC HEARINGS















County, Maryland






TO THE MEETING.









few weeks:



1.

2.

3.

Documents:

4.

5.

Documents:

https://www.qac.org/4a4d7f74-4168-4ff3-803f-4aa09634aa77

county Commissioners:James J. Moran, At LargeJack N. Wilson, Jr., District IStephen Wilson, District 2Philip L. Dumnenil, District 3Christopher M. Corchiarino, District 4

MEMORANDUM

Date: June 22, 2021 ACTION ITEM

To: Sanitary Commission

From: Alan Quimby

Re SKI Phase 1 — Improved ProperttesRendenng of Benefit Assessment

If you will recall, a public hering was held on June 8, 2021 to fix the amount of the sewer benefitassessment levy pursuant to Section 24-29 of the code of public local laws of Queen Anne’s Countywithin the Southern Kent Island Wastewater Subdistrict — Phase 1 (Kent Island Estates and RomancokeSubdivisions).

The proposed benefit assessment, which would be effective July 1, 2021, for existing improvedproperties within the Phase I sewer service area is S15,220 which consists of a Base Cost ($2,320) andthe Septic Tank Effluent Pump Cost (S 12,900). The sum of the Base Cost and the STEP Cost may befinanced over a twenty-year period at 1.0%.

The record was left open for two weeks (until June 22). As of this writing, we are unaware of anyadditional public comment.

If agreeable, please make a motion similar to the following:

I move that we levy a benefit assessment in the amount of $15,220, payable over 20 years at 1.0%interest, on all Southern Kent Island — Phase 1 properties that were improved on or before May27, 2014 with an effective billing date of July 1, 2021.

LIVE • WORK • PLAY n QA

_____

vshquee nes,omthings to do... places to go iays to grow your business.., scan for info

QueenAnne S

County

IDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS312 Safety Drive

Centreville, MD 21617

Telephone: (410) 758-0925Fax: (410) 758-3341

www.qac.org

1

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSQueen 312 Safety Drive

.,4 nne Centreville, MD 21617

Count” Telephone: (410) 758-0925

________

Fax: (410) 758-3341county Commissioners: www.qac.orgJames J. Moran, At LargeJack N. Wilson, Jr., District 1Stephen Wilson, District 2Philip L. Dumenil, District 3Christopher M. Corchiarino, District 4

MEMORANDUM

Date: June 22, 2021 ACTION ITEM

To: Sanitary Commission

From: Alan Quimby

Re: SKI Phase 2 — Vacant PropertiesRendering of Benefit Assessment

If you will recall, a public hearing was held on June 8, 2021 to fix the amount of the sewer benefitassessment levy pursuant to Section 24-29 of the code of public local laws of Queen Anne’s Countywithin the Southern Kent Island Wastewater Subdistrict — Phase 2 (Tower Gardens Subdivision).

The proposed benefit assessment, which would be effective July 1, 2021, for existing vacant propertieswithout a valid state approved percolation test within the Phase 2 sewer service area is S27,920 whichconsists of a Base Cost (S2,320) and the Economic Benefit Premium Cost (S25,600). The EBP reflects aportion of the increase in the lot’s value realized making it buildable.

In addition, the hearing also addressed existing vacant properties with a valid state approved percolationtest consisting solely of a Base Cost ($2,320).

Both assessments may be financed over a twenty-year period at 1.0%.

The record was left open for two weeks (until June 22). As of this writing, we are unaware of anyadditional public comment.

If agreeable, please make motion similar to the following:

I move that we levy a benefit assessment in the amount of $27,920 on all Southern Kent Island —

Phase 2 vacant properties without a valid state approved percolation test, and $2,320 on allSouthern Kent Island — Phase 2 vacant properties with a valid state approved percolation test,with an effective billing date of July 1,2021. Both assessments are payable over 20 years at 1.0%interest.

LIVE.WORK. PLAY InQAt visitqueenrnnes.corn

things to do... places to go iays to grow your business.., scan for info

2

Queen Anne’s County Department of Emergency Services1 00 Commumcations Drive . Centreville, l’Aaryland 21617

Phone 410.758.4500. Fax 410.758.2086

9-1-1 Communications . Animal Control. EMS. Emergency ManagementFire Marshal+ Support Services

Date: June 15, 2021 Action ItemTo: Board of County Commissioners

From: Scott A. Haas, Director

Cc: Todd Mohn, Administrator

Re: Backup 9-1-1 Center Furniture from Watson Consoles

The Department of Emergency Services has been awarded grant funding from theMaryland 9-1-1 Board, Project #21-286, for $87,087.69. The purpose of this grant isto procure five (5) 9-1-1 workstations for the DES Public Safety 9-1-1 Backup Center.Watson Consoles was the vendor chosen as part of the FY2021 renovation to theDES building through the H-GAC contract Number ECO7-20. Included in the contractis:

• Five (5) 9-1-1 workstations that mirror those at the primary center• Electronically Height Adjustable work surface with Manual Depth Adjustment• Environmental Control Package — Forced Air Heat, Cooling Fans, and LED

Lighting

This grant entirely funds the construction of the furniture, shipping, and installation atthe Backup 9-1-1 Center.

Recommended Motion: I move to authorize the Director of the Department ofEmergency Services to execute a contract with Watson Consoles to build andinstaN five (5) 9-1-1 workstations off of the H-GAC contract utilizing theMaryland 9-1-1 Board funding totaling $87,087.69.

3

Queen DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING.,4 nne ‘S 110 VincitSt., Suite 104


(F-’ CountyTelephone Planning: (410) 758-1255

County Commissioners: Fax Planning: (410) 758-2905James J. Moran At Large . -

VTelephone Permits: (410) 78-4088

Jack N. Wilson, Jr., District I . -

Stephen Wilson, District 2Fax Permits: (410) 78-3972

Philip L. Dumenil, District 3Christopher M. Corchiarino, Distnct 4

ACTION ITEM

MEMORANDUM

DATE: JUNE 22, 2021

To: QUEEN ANNE’S COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

FROM: STEPI-IANIEJONES, PRINCIPAL PLANNER

SUBJECT: EXTENSION REQUESTCITIZENS SPONSORED TEXT AMENDMENT #21-04

Chapter 18 contains provisions for text and map amendments. In accordance with § 18:1-218, citizen

sponsored applications for text amendments may be filed with the Office of the Clerk to the County

Commissioners for consideration by the County Commissioners only during the first 10 business days in

the month of February of each calendar year. During this annual window, the County received thisapplication for consideration at the Coun Commissioners March 23, 2021 meeting which was then

conveyed to the Planning Commission for report and recommendation.

The Planning Commission made a recommendation on this application at their April 8, 2021 meeting which

included a condition that the applicant amend the language to address staffs comments and concerns, as

discussed with the Planning Commission. Staff has recently received amendments to the proposed language

which have led to further review and comments. Staff continues to work with the applicant to finalize the

language to be put forward to the Board of County Commissioners. Therefore, an extension is being

requested.

COIJNTY ( )\IMISS[( NLR ACTIONIn accordance with 18:1-220(C) (1) EAction by Planning Commission], staff request a review extension from

the County Commissioners for TACO #21-04 as the delays outlined above place the Planning Commissionrecommendation outside of the required 90-day turn around period.

SVUGGESTED.NPTIONI MOVE TO GRANT A REVIEW EXTENSION IN ACCORDANCE WITH § 18:1-220(C) (1) FOR CITIZEN

SPONSORED TEXT AMENDMENT APPLICATION #21-04 WHICH WAS CONVEYED TO THE

PLANNING COMMISSION BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AT ITS MARCH 23, 2021 MEETING. ICITE THE PUBLIC REVIEW DELAY IN THE PROCESS TO BE CAUSED BY COORDINATION BETWEEN

THE APPLICANT AND PLANNING STAFF IN ORDER TO MEET THE CONDITIONS OF THE

PLANNING COMMISSION’S RECOMMENDATION AS GROIJNDS TO GRANT THE 90-DAY

EXTENSION.

4

QueenAnne sCounty

Countr Coin inissioners:James J. Moran, At LargeJack N. Wilson, Jr., District IStephen Wilson, District 2Philip L. Dutnenil, District 3Christopher M. Corchiarino, District 4

Bay Bridge Airports’Linda Steiner, Airport Manager

Bay Bridge Airport202 Airport RoadStevensville, MD 21666Telephone: (410) 643-4364Fax: (410) 643-42730 \vw.bavbrideeairport.orue-mail: [email protected]

Date: June 22, 2021

MEMORANDUM

To: County Commissioners ACTION ITEM

Via: Stephen Chandlee, Director, Department of Parks and Recreation

From: Linda Steiner, Manager, Bay Bridge Airport

Subject: On-call Airport Consultant Services

Every five years the FAA requires a Request for Qualifications be posted for selection of an On-call Airport Consultant Firm, resulting in a Master Agreement which is to be active for fiveyears. Per the corresponding Advisory Circular FAA AC 5100-1 4E and the FAA AlP Handbook,consultant selection is qualifications based only. Fees can be negotiated when you issue a taskorder assignment and all scopes over 100k go through an independent fee estimate to ensurecosts are reasonable. FAA pays 90% of the on-call consultant fees for all Airport CapitalImprovement Proj ects.

This year two companies responded to the posting, AECOM our current on-call consultant, andMimar Ponte Mellor and Campbell & Paris Joint Venture. The Bay Bridge Airport AdvisoryBoard has reviewed the two proposals and unanimously voted that based on AECOM’sexemplary record of service with the Airport and the County for over 50 years and their provenknowledge and experience in the required areas, to continue to retain AECOM as Bay BridgeAirport’s On-call Airport Consultant Firm.

Requested Action:I move to authorize Bay Bridge Airport to enter into a five-year contract retainingAECOM as the Airport’s On-call Consultant Firm. Funding for Consultant fees for ACIPprojects is covered at 90% by FAA grants.

5

1-‘

Statement of Qualifications I June 1, 2021

AECOM 410 785 7220 tel

4 North Park Drive 410 785 5818 faxSuite 300Hunt Valley, MD 21030www.aecom.com

June 1,2021

Ms. Linda Steiner, Airport Manager

Bay Bridge Airport

202 Airport Road

Stevensville, Maryland 21666

Reference: Statement of QualificationsAviation Consulting Services - Bay Bridge Airport - Stevensville, Maryland

Dear Ms. Steiner:

AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM) is pleased to submit six (6) copies of our Statement of Qualifications to provide

aviation consulting services for Queen Anne’s County at the Bay Bridge Airport (W29). Our submittal has been assembled in

accordance with the guidelines established in the Request for Submittals issued May 3, 2021.

AECOM values the partnership developed with the County over the past 50+ years through the successful delivery of

numerous projects at W29 and we look forward to continuing our partnership on the next Aviation Consulting Services

contract. In this Statement of Qualifications, we will demonstrate that the AECOM Project Team is the right choice based on

our general aviation experience; our knowledge of local conditions and the Airport, the County, and State of Maryland; our

expertise with Federal, State, and local permitting, regulations, and funding; our quality of work; our excellent working

relationship with the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) Maryland Aviation Administration (MAA) and Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA); and our exceptional client service.

Our focus on continuity and familiarity results in assembling a team that has worked successfully with the County in this

capacity over many decades. Our team has contributed significantly to Airport’s master planning, environmental planning and

associated analyses, airside and landside development, and strategic planning initiatives. We have assembled this team in

direct response to our understanding of the disciplines required and the County’s objectives to complete your Airport Capital

Improvement Program. Thus, our team consists of firms and individuals who have relevant aviation experience at W29, as well

as comparable general aviation airports throughout the region in delivering multi-year and multi-million-dollar programs

through on-call contracts.

AECOM commits the full resources of the company to help you achieve your goals. We pledge our commitment, creativity,

and enthusiasm to the timely completion of each task order assigned as part of the airport team. We have partnered with the

following firms for this contract: The Robert B. Baiter Company, W.D. Schock Company, Inc., and Soil & Land Use Technology.

Our combined team encompasses all the technical and management skills needed to address any task order.

We are proud of the accomplishments we have achieved at W29 and we appreciate the opportunity to submit this Statement

of Qualifications. As you consider our qualifications, we are confident you will conclude that AECOM is your best choice for

this contract. The AECOM Project Team looks forward with commitment and enthusiasm to again partner with the County at

W29 as we work together to improve the Airport and increase its utility and value to the community with the most notable

projects nearing fruition - “Rehabilitate Runway 11-29” and “Rehabilitate South Apron”.

Thank you for the opportunity to demonstrate our qualifications and we look forward to the next step in the selection process.

Sincerely,

Jennifer M. LutzAssociate Vice President / Program ManagerAECOM Technical Services, Inc.jennifer.lutz©aecom.com

Aviation Consulting Sevices - Bay Bldge Afroot - Stevensville, Maryland

TOC Table of Contents

CONTENTS

TRANSMITTAL LETTER

1 Overall Qualifications and Specific Experience of Key Personnel 1

2 Availability and Location of Key Personnel 12

3 Firm’s Experience with FAAand MDOT MAA Funding Programs 13

4 Ongoing Projects 16

5 Relevant Projects 17

6 Familiarity 25

AECOM

Aviation Consulting SeR/ices - Ba\’ Bidge Airport Stevensville, Mavland

Overall Qualifications and Specific Experience of Key Personnel

Given our familiarity with the multiple objectives for the Bay Bridge Airport, AECOM standsprepared to assist with your development priorities in today’s challenging times; our teamoffers an understanding of emerging trends, strategic practices, the distinct disciplines whereperformance and a heightened focus is required, and the qualifications and experience toexecute accordingly.

AECOM Technical Services Inc. (AECOM) has had the pleasure

and distinct advantage of working closely with Queen Anne’s

County in support of the Bay Bridge Airport (W29) for over

50 years on a variety of planning, environmental, engineering,architectural, and construction tasks under our past and existing

on-call contracts, thus offering us a perspective on what liesahead. Airport growth and strategic development initiatives

have met the slowdown associated with the covlD-] 9pandemic. Despite the challenging times, it is important that

the county continue to move forward and stay ahead of their

plans, commitments, and responsibilities as they relate to futureairport development. As the County evaluates its developmentpriorities and corresponding Airport capital ImprovementProgram (ACIP), we stand ready to assist in moving yourprograms forward. We have used our collective perspectives on

your development priorities to focus our approach and align our

resources for this Aviation Consulting Services contract to bestassist the County in moving forward.

We cannot overemphasize our desire to continue to serve

as the County’s Aviation Engineering Consultant at W29.

In this Statement of Qualifications, we will demonstrate thatthe AECOM Project Team is the right choice based on ourunparalleled knowledge of your Airport and general aviation; ourexpertise with Federal, State, and local permitting, regulations,and funding; our quality of work; our excellent workingrelationship with the Maryland Department of Transportation

(MDOT) Maryland Aviation Administration (MAA) and FederalAviation Administration (FAA); and our exceptional client service.Specifically, in accordance with the Scope of Work outlined inyour Request for Submittals, this Statement of Qualificationswill show our exemplary capabilities as they relate to providingfull-service aviation consulting services on an on-call basis; ourunderstanding of all pertinent local, State, and Federal laws andguidelines including those of the FAA; and our knowledge ofthe State and Federal Airport Improvement Program (AlP) andassociated funding processes, as well as the us Department ofTransportation’s (DOT) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)program.

ABOUT AECOM

NEARLY

r2OHUNT VALLEY MARYLAND

I 400 VIRGINIA• PENN SYLVA N IA

F

AECOM is a premier fully integrated professional and technicalservices firm and is ranked as the #1 Transportation Firm byEngineering News Record magazine’s annual industry rankings.As a Fortune 500 firm, AECOM is a leader in the key markets that

it services, including aviation and transportation facilities. Weprovide a blend of global reach, innovation, technical excellence,

and local knowledge to deliver customized and creative

solutions to meet your needs at W29.

AECOM’S HISTORY OF EXCELLENCEIN AVIATIONThrough our legacy companies, AECOM has been providingconsulting services to airports since 1941. For over 80 years,

AECOM has provided airport master planning, environmentalservices, airfield pavement and lighting design, terminalplanning and architectural design, roadway and parking facilitydesign, surveying, construction phasing and coordination withoperations, and overall program management for over 500airports throughout the us. Specifically, we have provided theseservices to nearly 100 airports within the FAA’s Eastern Regionand, most notably, many of Maryland’s airports, including W29.From this experience, we’ve amassed a broad knowledge ofsituations and solutions that no other firm can match.

AECOMFAST FACTS

ENR2O2OD - TRANor.,,.’

‘, AIRPORTS

AECOM STAFF

47 p

7150+countries

‘ECOM

Aviation Consulting Services - Bay Bidge Afroot - Stevensville, MayIand

AECOM•Atlantic City Intl Airport ACY

Cambndge-Dorchester erport CGE

Carroll Cousty Regional Airport 0MW

Coliege °a’k Aert CGS

Crisfield-Sonterset County Airport W41

Bay Bridge Airport W29

Delaware Aepark 33N

Doser Air Force Base DOV

EastonfNewnarn Fred ESN

Frederick iuniclpal Airport FDK

Garrett Cojoty Airport 2G4

Greaten Cambeland Regional Airport CBE

Hage’sto;snr Regional Airport HGR

Ha’nisburc Intl Airport MOT

Lehigh Valey Intl Arrport ABE

Manassas Regional Airport HEF

MaCtin State Airoort MTN

New Castle Airport ILG

Ocean City Mnnicp.Airocrt OXB

Ronald Reagan Washingtor National Aepott DCA

St Mary’s County Regona Aeport 2W6

Washington Dales Int’l Airport lAD

Winchester Regonal Airprl 0KV

We have a tradition of innovation and dependabilityin our planning and design assignments becausewe provide individualized service and qualityresponsiveness to the special requirements of eachclient and project.

AECOM knows and understands the importance of the region’s

airports to the National Air Transportation System and is

committed to supporting their growth. The graphic shownabove, as well as the matrix on the following page, highlights our

extensive experience working with the airports located within theregion.

Although we work at some of the nation’s busiestairports, the focus of much of our day-to-dayconsulting work is for general aviation. Our staff isexperienced in dealing with the unique challengesfaced by general aviation airports and has a provenapproach to operate as an extension of airport staff.

SPECIALIZED EXPERTISEAECOM is recognized as one of the nation’s premierArchitectural/Engineering (A/F) consultants for all phases of

airport planning, environmental, design, and construction. Ourteam’s experience covers the entire airport complex as listedbelow. What separates us from the competition is that wecan perform all these services with in-house staff, promotinga collaborative and efficient relationship with our clients that

cannot be surpassed. The subconsultants on our team arehand-selected to provide quality support specialty services.

Airport PlanningAirport planning requires the ability to integrate the various

operating elements of an airport into a smoothly functionalsystem. This requires creating a phased capital improvement

program (CIP) to meet the airport’s long-term needs. Ourplanning experience has addressed airfield facilities, navigationalaids, passenger terminals, cargo and Fixed Based Operator(FBO( areas and hangars, access and parking facilities, andnon-aviation commercial facilities. In addition, AECOM hasaccomplished site planning for specific airport projects and

development areas for the purpose of establishing alternativesfor operational, environmental, and financial evaluations.

We also complete full Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan(ALP) Updates, which provide short-, medium-, and long-rangevisions of the Airport. AECOM provides a distinct advantage tothe County by providing access to both planning and design

S4

Ø,

rO_-

r’’ 1I — -‘ ‘ .\ .--‘-.‘: .-c’r, -s

C

,Q SHD FBE RICKSBURG<..0 rjfLl.

AtL011EStBUB 2 j LKU

/ ,ut,’nfl.TnA” ,.

Tr- ATR

i /

:7

2

Aviation Consulting Sevices - Bay Bidge Airport - Stevensville, Mayland

expertise in-house. For design assignments, AECOM may applyand integrate important elements from the planning process

into the early design decisions, relative to layout requirements,

project interfaces, scheduling, cost estimates, and agency!tenant coordination.

RecentlLocal Airport Planning ExperienceMaryland Airport System Plan (MOOT MAA, Statewide)Land Release Justification Package (W29)Pen and ink updates to ALPs (W41 W29, OXB, ESN)Hangar siting evaluations (W41, W29, OXB, ESN)Exhibit A-Property Map (W41, W29, CGE, OXB, ESN)

• NAVAID analysis (OXB, W29, CGE, ESN)• Airfield signage and marking (OXB CGE, ESN, W29)• Aircraft path planning analysis (OXB, W29, ESN)

Land Acquisition

acquisitions, AECOM routinely assists Sponsors in meeting

the requirements and supporting their assurances to the FAA.AECOM is very familiar with the Uniform Act and all applicableguidance documents for federal real property acquisition and

relocation regulations, including the FAA Advisory Circular1 50/5100-17, Land Acquisition and Relocation Assistance for

Airport Improvement Program Assisted Projects: FAA Order1050.19, Environmental Due Diligence Audits in the Conduct

of FAA Real Property Transactions: FAA Order 5100.37, Land

Acquisition and Relocation Assistance for Airport Projects: FAA

Order 5100.38, Airport Improvement fAIP) Handbook: FAA Order

5190.6, Airport Compliance Manual: and FAA’s guidance on

Acquiring Land for Airports and Relocation Assistance.

I Recent/Local Airport Land AcquisitionExperience

• Avigation Easements for Obstruction Removal Programs

[ (W29, W41, ESN, CGE, OXB)• Access and Removal Agreements for Obstruction

Removal Programs (W29, W41 ESN)• Fee-Simple Acquisition for Obstruction Removal

Programs (OXB)

• Fee-Simple Acquisition for Runway Extension Programs

(ESN)• Exhibit A — Property Map (W4 1, W29, CGE, OXB, ESN)• Environmental Due Diligence Audits (W29, ESN, OXB)

Airports typically need to acquire land either through teesimple or an avigation easement for development projects or

to promote land use compatibility. When land acquisition is

necessary for AlP-assisted development purposes, the Uniform

Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for Federal

and Federally Assisted Program [49 Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR) Part 24], referred to as the Uniform Act, must be followed.Having secured dozens of avigation easements and fee simple

Runway!Taxiway Extensions! Relocations

NAVAIDS/FAA Procedures Design

.

.

.

. ..

.

.

.

.

. I •

. .Runway/Taxiway Rehabilitations • I •

Utility Design/Coordination • • I

Apron/Hangar Design • •

SWM Design •

Roadways — Relocations/New/Reconstruction •

Fencing/Security•

Obstruction Analyses • • • •

Land Acquisition Services • • • •

Environmental Mitigation & Permitting • • • •

NEPA Analyses I • • •

Bidding Assistance • • •

Construction Administration • • • • :

ALP Updates • •

Grant/DBE Program Admin • •

Multi-Year On-Call Contract V

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

V

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

‘7

•

•

•

•

.

•

•

•

•

‘7

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

V.

•

•

•

•

•

•

‘7

AECOIvI

A’iatio’ Consufting Smvices - Bay Bidge Avoot - Stevensvile, Ma-viand

Airspace Analysis

AECOM provides a wide range of airspace services to airportsof all sizes. These services include the analysis of 14 CFRPart 77, as well as the US Standard for Terminal InstrumentProcedures (TERPS) surfaces and the assessment of thosesurfaces in relation to existing and/or proposed obstructions.AECOM uses a variety of obstacle data to assess airspaceconditions. Sources such as the FAAs Airport Data andInformation Portal is used to assess obstructions to airspacesurfaces. In cases where no existing obstruction data exists,AECOM has conducted aeronautical surveys in accordance withthe standards specified in FAA Advisory Circulars 1 50/5300-1 6B, 150/5300-1 7C, and 1 50/5300-1 8B to obtain currentobstruction data.

In addition to conducting airspace assessments, AECOM alsocoordinates airspace evaluations for our clients with the FAAusing the FAA’s Form 7460 submittals on the FAAs ObstructionEvaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis web portal. Thesesubmittals are routinely conducted for airport constructionactivities, as well as proposed development on and off airport.

I Recent/Local Airspace Experience• 14 CFR Part 77 analyses (W41 W29, CGE, OXB, ESN)• Form FAA 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction

(W41 OXB, CGE, ESN, W29)

*iii \‘

I— jL fl j -,

-8

C——

— /

Environmental ServicesAirport environmental services include noise abatement, landuse, stormwater management, permitting and mitigation forwetlands, forests, and other natural features, and compliancewith Federal, State, and local environmental laws andregulations. AECOM has completed numerous environmentalanalyses in accordance with the National Environmental PolicyAct of 1 969 (NEPA), FAA Order 5050.4B, National EnvironmentalPolicy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions,and FAA Order 1050.1 F, Environmental Impacts; Policies andProcedures. AECOM’s extensive experience in the field ofairport environmental assessments (EA5) and Categorical

AECOM

Exclusions (CATEX5) and our proven ability to provide solutionsto environmental problems have helped a significant number ofMaryland airport sponsors. We have prepared and conducted:scoping meetings, comprehensive data collection, agencycontact and coordination, and multi-disciplined analyses. Wehave also participated in and conducted many public meetingsand hearings, as well as coordinated multi-level public andregulating agency coordination programs.

Recent/Local Environmental Experience• EA for Release of Non-Aeronautical Land (W29)• EA for Airfield Improvements (W29)• EA for Five-Year CIP (ESN, OXB)• EA for Obstruction Removal (W41, W29)• CATEXs for hangar developments (ESN, HGR, W29)• CATEXs for Airfield Force (W29)• Wetland permitting/mitigation (ESN W29 W41, OXB,

CGE)• Forest Stand Delineations and Forest Conservation

Plans (ESN, W41 W29, OXB)• Chesapeake! Atlantic Bay Critical Area permitting!

mitigation (W29, W41 OXB)

AECOM has experience in the development of every type ofairport building conceivable, including terminals, hangars(corporate and “T”), administration buildings, maintenancebuildings, Air Traffic Control Towers (ATCT5), and aircraft rescueand firefighting (ARFF) facilities. Our experience extends todemolition of existing buildings for obstruction removal and fordevelopment purposes, as well as soundproofing for noiseabatement. We have developed general aviation complexes toinclude combinations of tie-down aprons, T-hangars, andcorporate hangars, as well as new terminal facilities. The AECOMProject Team has a perfect balance of national and localexpertise to make any airport architectural project go smoothly.

Recent/Local Architecture Experience• T-hangars F4, ES, and F6 (W29)• T-hangars F, G, H, and I (OXB)• ARFF (HGR)• Terminal modifications (HGR)• Terminal expansions (BWI)

LAirport Architecture

4

Aviation Consulting Services- Bay Bidge Airport - Stevensville, Maryland

Airport Engineering

The AECOM Project Team offers full-service aviationengineering services, Specific expertise includes: projectcoordination and phasing with tenants, users, and airportmaintenance / operational personnel; development andmonitoring of pavement testing and soil boring programs;pavement section design including subgrade stabilizationsystems; development of geometric designs that accommodatethe airport fleet mix; development of pavement design mixesand material specifications; development of comprehensiveairfield drainage systems; design of airfield lighting systems andtheir rehabilitation, including lighting vaults and monitors; andpreparation of construction cost estimates.

Recent/Local Engineering Experience• Obstruction Removal (ESN, CGE, W41 OXB, W29)• Duct Bank Crossing (ESN)• Air Repair Hangar Roof Overlay (ESN)• Pavement Maintenance (ESN, CGE, W29)• Runway 14-32 RSA Standards and Rehabilitation (OXB)• New Wildlife Fence (W29, CGE, OXB)• West Ramp Rehabilitation and Expansion (OXB)• Runway 11-29 Rehabilitation (W29)

\\\

-

______

\ -

‘-k -

Pavement Management Plans

AECOM has performed Pavement Condition Index (PCI) surveysin accordance with ASTM and FAA standards for more than 30years. Pavement Management Plans (PMP) and PCIs are thecommon ways for the FAA to prioritize pavement rehabilitation!reconstruction projects nationally.

Within the last several years in Maryland, this teamrecently completed Pavement Management Planprojects at Bay Bridge Airport (W29), CrisfieldSomerset County Airport (W41), Baltimore/WashingtonInternational Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI Marshall),Martin State Airport (MTN), Ocean City MunicipalAirport (OXB), and Easton/Newnam Field Airport (ESN).

We have performed surveys manually at client sites andperformed surveys on imagery from downward facing pavementphotos. The firm has also trained clients to perform their ownsurveys. AECOM has developed extensive quality reviewprocedures to ensure high-quality data including overlapsurveys, statistical analysis, photo review, and historicalcomparisons. Project workflows generally include inventoryupdates through to capital programming, therefore, distress dataquality is the critical input to a useful and accurate final product.

AECOM

Construction Phase Services

AECOM has extensive experience providing construction phaseservices at airports. In this role, AECOM is responsible forproviding airport sponsors the end-product defined in the plansand specifications. During the construction phase of a project,AECOM typically assists in conducting the Pre-ConstructionConference and provides technical advice in all areas duringconstruction. AECOM reviews and approves all constructionshop drawings, material certificates, and mix designs. We alsoperform inspection of work in progress, assistance in thepreparation of progress payments to the contractor, andnegotiations of change orders. We additionally serve to providea direct interface between the Client, regulatory and fundingagencies, tenants, and the Contractor by administering andoverseeing the construction contracts. After the final inspection,we prepare a construction report summarizing the designrationale, construction methods, quality control, quantities,contract compliance, problems encountered duringconstruction, contract modifications, test results, contractschedule, and as-built record drawings. AECOM has atremendous record of completing major construction projectson time and within budget.

Obstruction Removal (ESN, W41, W29, CGE, OXB)Runway 14-32 RSA Standards and Rehabilitation (OXB)Air Repair Hangar Roof Overlay (ESN)Duct Bank Crossing (ESN)Pavement Maintenance (ESN, CGE)New Wildlife Fence (OXB, W29, CGE)Non-Tidal Wetland Creation Site (ESN, OXB)West Ramp Rehabilitation and Expansion (OXB)

Unmanned Aircraft Systems

AECOM, as a visionarycorporation, increasinglyviews the use ofUnmanned AircraftSystems (UAS) (“Drones”)as an innovative approachto obtain aerial and spatialinformation in and aroundthe airport efficiently at lower costs with less risk. The AECOMHunt Valley, MD office has an FAA certified UAS operator.

I

Recent/Local Construction Experience

5

Aviation Consulting Sevces - Bay Bridge Airoort - Stevensville, Maryland

FAA DBE Program and Annual ReportsThe US DOT Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)program is implemented by recipients of DOT Federal FinancialAssistance, which includes the FAA. Airport sponsors thatreceive FAA grants for airport planning or development, whowill award prime contracts the cumulative total value of whichexceeds $250,000 in a fiscal year, must have a DBE programand meet related requirements as a condition of receivingthese funds. To meet the stated objectives of the DBE program,Sponsors must develop and implement a DBE program thatconforms to DOT standards set forth in 49 CFR Part 26. ASponsor is obligated to assign a DBE Liaison Officer; documentthe current and three-year goals if expecting AlP funding; submita report annually including a shortfall analysis, if necessary; anddocument a monitoring program including prompt paymentand retainage. AECOM is very familiar with the goal settingand program documentation process through the FAA’s dbEConnect and has been assisting the County with this process.

AECOM’s Diversity Program is an integral part of our approachto program management, which allows us to complement ourown technical expertise with the various resources availablein the small business community. For this contract, we haveselected W.D. Schock (WDSCO) and Soil and Land UseTechnology (SaLUT) as our DBE partners to assist with landacquisition services, if necessary, and quality assurance testing,respectively. Since on-call, task order contracts are, by nature,loosely defined at the onset, we would welcome additional firmson our team to maximize participation of minority- and woman-owned businesses in meaningful, significant roles.

The Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2020-2022 DBE goal approved forW29 was 4.23%. We are committed to meeting or exceedingthe established DBE participation goal through participation ofsubconsultants currently on our Team, through the addition ofapplicable subconsultants relative to the task order assigned,and/or through provisions stipulated in contract documents forthe upcoming construction of the Rehabilitation of Runway 11 -

29 project.

PROJECT TEAM AND KEY STAFFOur people are what make the AECOM Project Team so special—very talented and enthusiastic airport professionals whoare among the best in the aviation industry. We have includedpersonnel experienced with all aspects of airfield and landsidedesign, including general consulting, funding procurement andgrant administration, planning and programming, engineeringdesign, architectural design, resident engineering, masterplanning, environmental analysis, noise studies, preparationof DBE plans, land surveying, construction administration, andassociated services, and many more to serve as a “one-stopshop” for W29.

What separates AECOM from our competitors is thatwe have the full range of capabilities to provide aviationservices under one roof. This has been an advantagefor every client, including Queen Anne’s County, as itallows us to complete tasks efficiently, saving you timeand money.

Our people understand airports and, most importantly, theneeds of the County at W29. Because most of them haveworked on nothing but airports for their entire careers, theyunderstand airport physical properties, airport operationsand maintenance issues, airport permitting requirements,airport tenant relationships, airport! community relationships,and everything else that makes your airport function safelyand efficiently day in and day out. The AECOM professionalswith whom we work in other disciplines — site and civildesign, structural engineering, water resources, biologicaland ecological sciences, mechanical and electrical and fireprotection engineering, architecture — have supported ourairport group for so many years that they fully understand howtheir work has to fit into an airport environment.

Furthermore, our professionals have worked at all sizes andtypes of airports in Maryland and, in doing so, we are a knowncommodity with the permitting and regulatory agencies.Some of our in-house professionals were with regulatoryagencies before they came to AECOM, so they know permittingrequirements inside and out. This is a major advantage ingetting permit applications approved. We have earned a level ofcredibility and respect with these agencies that will continue tobenefit projects at W29.

Organizational ChartThe AECOM Project Team will continue to provide the Countywith seasoned aviation experts who are familiar with yourprogram. AECOM will serve as the Prime Consultant for thiscontract and will be led by Jennifer Lutz — Program Manager.The Robert B. Baiter Company (BaIter), WDSCO, and SaLUTare subconsultants on our team that will provide specialtysupport services. As with past and current contracts, theCounty will greatly benefit from the collaborative efforts andour Team’s knowledge of W29 to complete all projects at theAirport on time and under budget. Cost-effectiveness andvalue engineering are biproducts of having an experienced localteam with a multitude of in-house resources with institutionalknowledge of the Airport.

Of special importance is our genuine team spirit.We are a “can-do” team that knows how to work withpeople and keep the ball rolling.

AECOM 6

Aviation Consulting Services - Bay Bndge AVnort Sfevensville, Maryland

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

Program Manager

Jennifer Lutz F

Quality Assurance!Quality Control

Andy Jansing-Kaestner, PE F

NEPA DocumentationJennifer Lutz FDan Botto

Natural ResourcesPermittingJoanna HieblerFJennifer Slacum

Planning

Master PlanningHoward Klein

Airspace AnalysesKen Brazeau FHoward Klein

Land AcquisitionServicesEva Maples (W) 0ACIP Planning I GrantAdministrationJennifer Lutz FDerek Hollinger, PE F

DBE MonitoringProgram ManagementScheduling

System Planning

Engineering

Airfield Civil EngineeringDerek Hollinger, PE FJack Deter, PETony Becker, PENicholas CotaMatthew HughesGarrett Moffett

SurveyingPaul Ewell, PLS

Geotechnical EvaluationKristopher Grist, PE, PG (B)Matthew Leone, PE (B)

Electrical & CommunicationsKen LeperaAshok Aggarewal, FE

UtilitiesCurtis Grieveson, PEJohn Gruen, PE

Stormwater ManagementlErosion & Sediment ControlJamie Frank, PE

StructuralJeff Birkenthal, PE

ArchitectureMicnae’ Collins, AlAKristen Young, AlAFekade Amare. LEED AP

Construction

Construction AdministrationDerek Hollinger, PE FJack Deter, FEKen LeperaCurtis Grieveson, PE

Resident ProjectRepresentativesDerek Hollinger, PE FNicholas CotaMatthew Hughes

Quality Assurance Testing &Inspectionlmran Syed, PhD, PE )S)Kristopher Crist, PG, PE (B)

Planning & Environmental

Jennifer Lutz F

Engineering & Construction

Derek Hollinger, PE A

Additional Services

Safety Risk Management

AGISValue EngineeringMaster Planning

KeyAll are AECOM staff, unless noted otherwiseF Indicates Key Staff - Resume Provided

0 DBE Firm(B) The Robert B. Baiter Company(S) Soil & Land Use Technology, Inc. 0(W) W.D.Schock0

AECOId 7

Aviation Consulting Services Bay Bridge Afrpot - Stevensville, Ma’yland

Subconsultants

Although AECOM is a large firm possessing an immeasurableamount of ability and resources, we believe that the correctapproach in selecting a team for this contract is to select ateam that can provide you with a local presence and dedicated

service. For this contract, AECOM will team with three specialty

subconsultants who have supported us over the years. In

assembling the team and defining the Key Staff, AECOM

recognizes the importance of utilizing a high quality, familiar,

and capable staff on your projects while maintaining the proper

representation of firms certified as a DBE under the Maryland

Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) Certification Program.

The Robert B. Baiter111 OEOR1 5. BALTER COMPANY

Company (Baiter) will continue •to serve as our subconsultant ‘““‘“‘°‘ Yg

for geotechnical investigations

and analyses. Baiter is a full-service geotechnical and qualityassurance consulting firm providing geotechnical engineering,

quality assurance/quality control, acceptance testing, civil

and materials inspection, laboratory materials testing and

comprehensive subsurface exploration services. Through

two solid generations of service, Baiter has developed a solidreputation as one of the most experienced geo-environmentalengineering firms in the Mid-Atlantic region. Baiter hassupported AECOM on numerous projects at airports inMaryland, including W29.

THEAlthough land acquisition services

ITT SCJIOCVare not identified as being needed GROUP

within the next five years, in theevent that any would be needed, W.D. Schock Company, Inc.(WDSCO( will remain on our team and will continue to serve asour subconsultant for land acquisition services. WDSCO is anaviation management consultant firm organized for the purposeof providing professional consulting services to address

various noise mitigation, avigation easement, land acquisition,

relocation, property management, sales assistance, purchase

assurance, and sound insulation needs of aviation agencies

and authorities. WDSCO is nationally recognized by the FAAfor its expertise in managing the implementation of FederalAviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 Programs and similar airportgovernment improvement projects. WDSCO has supportedAECOM on many land acquisition projects in Maryland, mostnotably for the County at W29 for the Obstruction RemovalProgram. WDSCO is certified as a DBE and Small Business

Enterprise (SBE) in the State of Maryland under Certification No.17-114.

Working with Diversity

At AECOM. we have demonstrated a commitmentto including talented partner firms and individuals inour work. and much of this talent happens to residein DBE firms. We don’t work with DBE firms becausethey “check a box”. Rather. we work with DBE firmsbecause they do top-notch work and are among ourmost regular and trusted collaborators.

AECOM works with national and local organizationsaround the globe to foster supplier diversity and openthe doors of opportunity to Minority and Women-owned Business Enterprises (M/WBE and smallbusiness participation.

Hit $Soil and Land Use Technology,Inc. (SaLUT( will serve as oursubconsultant for constructionmaterials acceptance testing in support of the construction

management of this project. SaLUT is a geotechnical and quality

assurance consulting firm comprised of 95 employees with their

home office located in Glen Burnie, MD. SaLUT has supported

AECOM on numerous projects at airports throughout theMid-Atlantic region. SaLUT is certified as a DBE in the State ofMaryland under Certification No. 93-031.

Key Staff Resumes

SaLUT

AECOM’s attentive. personalized service is one of the secretsof our success. At W29, this begins with assigning a ProgramManager who you know can make your projects happen. Thus,

Jennifer Lutz will continue to serve in this role. Given Jennifer’s

extensive background in airport planning, NEPA, environmental

permitting and mitigation, grant administration, and ACIPplanning, Jennifer will also serve as the Planning/EnvironmentalTask Leader for this contract. Jennifer will be supported by

Andy Jansing-Kaestner, PE, who will provide quality assurance

and quality control for all projects assigned and by Derek

Hollinger, PE, who will serve as the Task Leader for Engineering

and Construction assignments. Jennifer, Derek, and Andy will

be supported by many other seasoned professionals; key staff

resumes are included below.

8

Aviation Consufti’ig Se’vices - Bay Bridge Aimot - Stevensville, Maryland

Jennifer LutzProgram ManagerYears of Experience

21 years

Jennifer’s expertise is in project management as we/las planning and environmental analyses of all types ofaviation related proiects. As a Program Manager, herresponsibilities include preparing Scopes of Work andoverall daily project and client management of planning,environn7entai design, and construction projects. Asan airport environmental planning specialist, Jennifersstrong background includes successful managementand performance of airport planning studies, EAs andother NEPA compliance documents. She is highly skilledat developing Purpose and Need statements, guidingthe analysis of alternatives, assessing environmentalimpacts, implementing public involvement programs,and coordinating with regulatory agencies. Jennifer isparticularly astute in areas concerning the airport fundingprocesses. Jennifer routinely assists airport clients withFAA and State Grant Applications. Jennifer wi/I assistthe Sponsor in development of the ACIP; preparation ofdocumentation of Applications for Federal Assistance;and submittal of FAA Requests for Reimbursement andGrant Closeouts.

Relevant ExperienceBay Bridge Airport. Program Manager for On-Call EngineeringServices Contract. Projects include: Planning, environmental(EA and wetland permitting/mitigation), and design servicesfor rehabilitation of Runway 11-29; Planning (land acquisition),environmental (EA and wetland permitting/mitigation), design,and constructions services for removal of obstructions tothe ‘14 CFR Part 77 surfaces of Runway 11-29; Planning,environmental, design, and constructions services forinstallation of airfield wildlife fencing; Planning services fornumerous ALP Updates, obstruction analyses, and FAAForm 7460-1 submittals; EAs for private non-aeronauticaldevelopment on-Airport property; Design and constructionphase services of the North Apron T-Hangar development;Design and construction phase services of the expansionof a new north apron and connector taxiways (Package 2);Design services for Package 3 (Relocation of Pier One Road)and Package 4 (Aircraft Apron Expansion); Planning servicesfor obstructions analysis for LPV approach; Design andconstruction phase services for Threshold Relocation and SealCoat; and Environmental services including numerous wetlandpermits and mitigation efforts; coordination, permitting, andmitigation with the Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Commission;and Forest Stand Delineations and Forest Conservation Plans inaccordance with the Maryland Forest Conservation Act.

Crisfield-Somerset County Airport. Program Manager for On-Call Engineering Services Contract. Projects include: Planningservices for numerous ALP Updates; Engineering services for aPMP; Planning (land acquisition), environmental (EA), design, andconstruction services for the removal of obstructions to the14 CFR Part 77 surfaces of Runway 14-32; Planning services

AECOM

Education

MS, Environmental Sciences and Policy

BS, Environmental Soil and Plant Science

for analysis of Snow Removal Equipment; and Environmentalservices including numerous wetland permits and mitigationefforts; coordination, permitting, and mitigation with theChesapeake Bay Critical Area Commission; and Forest StandDelineations and Forest Conservation Plans in accordance withthe Maryland Forest Conservation Act.

Easton/Newnam Field Airport. Program Manager for On-Call Engineering Services Contract. Projects include: EAfor the Airport’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Program,which includes a runway extension; Planning, environmental,design, and construction phase services for land acquisitionand obstruction removal to the 14 CFR Part 77 surfacesof Runway 4-22 and Runway 1 5-33; Engineering servicesfor a Pavement Analysis; Design and construction phaseservices for rehabilitation of lower level I-hangar taxilanes;NEPA documentation for development of various hangars;Planning services related to forecasting, critical aircraft, andrunway length analysis; Planning, environmental, design, andconstruction phase services for the expansion and rehabilitationof the South Apron and Landside Service Roads; EA for aProposed New Airport Traffic Control Tower; and Environmentalservices including numerous wetland permits and mitigationefforts; coordination, permitting, and mitigation with the USFish and Wildlife Service for impacts to Delmarva fox squirrel,a (then) Federally listed endangered species; and Forest StandDelineations and Forest Conservation Plans in accordance withthe Maryland Forest Conservation Act.

Ocean City Municipal Airport. Program Manager for On-CallEngineering Services Contract. Projects include: Planningservices including a Master Plan Update; EA for the Airport’sFive-Year Capital Improvement Program, which included RunwaySafety Area (RSA) improvements, obstruction removal, apronexpansions, and landside development; Design services forremoval of obstructions to the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces ofRunway 14-32 and Runway 2-2020; Engineering services for aPMP; Design and construction phase services for rehabilitationof the west ramp and associated taxilanes; Environmental,design, and construction phase services for installation ofAirport perimeter fencing; and Environmental services includingnumerous wetland permits and mitigation efforts; coordination,permitting. and mitigation with the Atlantic Coastal Bays CriticalArea Commission, and Forest Stand Delineations and ForestConservation Plans in accordance with the Maryland ForestConservation Act and Worcester County

Cambridge-Dorchester Airport. Program Manager for On-Call Engineering Services Contract. Projects included: Planningservices for an Airport Layout Plan Update; Planning andenvironmental services for obstructions identification; Designservices of the re-packaging of Package 2 (Aircraft ParkingApron and Vehicle Service Road) and Package 4 (Runway 1 6-34 Extension and Airfield Fencing); Environmental, design, andconstruction phase services for installation of Airport perimeterfencing; and Design services for removal of obstructions to the14 CFR Part 77 surfaces of Runway 16-34.

9

Aviation Consulting Services - Bay Bndqe Airoot - Stevensville, Mayland

Quality Assurance/Quality Control

Mr. Jansing-Kaestner’s experience includes constructionand design. His construction experience includes theestimating of projects for bid; owner construction inspection,owner contract administration: project management from acontractor perspective: and project development requiring thecoordination of compliance with various federal, state, and localagencies. His design experience consists of both structural andairport design, including bridge and retaining wall design, aircraftpavement design and layout, site grading, site evaluation, utilitycoordination, cost analysis and overall project development.

Recent Experience

Bay Bridge Airport. QA/QC Independent Reviewer for theRunway 11-29 Reconstruction and Safety Enhancementsincluding the reconstruction of the runway and rehabilitationof three taxiway connectors, reconfiguration of two taxiwayconnectors, and new airfield signage and lighting: removal ofobstructions that penetrate the 14 CFR Part 77 surface ofRunway 11-29 on-Airport and obstruction lighting of severalman-made obstructions: and installation of 7,000 LF of airfieldwildlife fencing.

Derek Hollinger, PE‘4. Engineering & Construction

Experience

Mr. Hollinger is a Project Manager experienced in airportplanning, design, engineering, and construction and specializesin the design and management of comprehensive airfieldsafety, standards, improvement, and expansion programs. Histechnical expertise includes airfield planning, layout, and sitedesign, earthwork analyses and design, hydrologic and hydraulicanalyses and design, pavement design and maintenance,construction safety and phasing, aircraft layouts andmodeling, utilities, environmental permitting, and preparationof construction plans, specifications, reports, and costestimates. Mr. Hollinger additionally has significant experiencein construction administration, inspection, and managementserving as Construction Manager on various programs.

Recent Experience

Bay Bridge Airport. Project Manager for the full reconstructionof Runway 11-29, rehabilitation of the 3 taxiway connectors,installation of new PAPIs and Runway End Identifier Lights(REILs), installation of new airfield signage and lighting,demolition of the Runway 29 end aligned taxiway and 2associated connector taxiways, construction of 2 newconnector taxiways to the Runway 29 threshold, andconstruction of a new Runway 29 end hold pad.

AECOM

License/RegistrationsProfessional Engineer: MD, VA. KY, TN

Crisfield-Somerset County Airport. Senior Project Engineerfor the crack sealing and seal coating of the runway, along withproviding new marking with a revised threshold for approachclearances. A new Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) wasprovided at a revised location due to the threshold relocation.

Ocean City Municipal Airport. QA/QC Independent Reviewerfor the program which includes the RSA stabilization andgrading for Runway 14-32, reconstruction and 30-foot shift ofRunway 14-32, relocation of Taxiway A, and the expansion andreconfiguration of the Terminal Apron.

Harrisburg International Airport. QA/QC IndependentReviewer for the bid packages which consists of thedemolition of an existing hangar floor and significant sitework for the 45,000 square yard Portland cement concretepavement expansion of the existing air cargo apron in order toaccommodate 2 new parking positions for B767-400 aircraftand 1 new parking position for a 3747-400 aircraft.

Easton I Newnam Field Airport. QA/QC Independent Reviewerfor Lower Level T-Hangar’s Taxilane Rehabilitation, whichincluded full depth reconstruction, mill and overlay, and newbituminous concrete pavement on a recompacted aggregatebase course for the taxilane and aprons serving 4 T-hangars.

Crisfield-Somerset County Airport. Project Manager forthe removal of obstructions that penetrate the ‘14 CER Part77 surfaces of Runway 14-32: Pavement Management Plan.Project Engineer in support of land acquisition projects.

Easton / Newnam Field Airport. Project Manager for theremoval of obstructions that penetrate the ‘14 CFR Part 77surfaces of Runway 4-22. The design additionally includes7460-1 forms, erosion and sediment control, wetlandpermitting, topsoiling/seeding, construction safety and phasing,and site access design and permitting.

Ocean City Municipal Airport. Project Manager for theinstallation of a new 14-10 dual frequency localizer, shelter, andDME, removal of the existing localized and shelter, and massearthwork to improve the RSA of Runway 14-32. Improvementsto the RSA include the construction of 83,000 cubic yardsof embankment to protect from tidal storm surges and a fullextended Runway 32 RSA into the Sinepuxent Bay.

Harrisburg International Airport. Project Manager for thedemolition of an existing hangar floor and significant sitework for the 45,100 square yard Portland cement concretepavement expansion of the existing air cargo apron in order toaccommodate 2 new parking positions for 3767-400 aircraftand 1 new parking position for a 3747-400 aircraft.

Andy Jansing-Kaestner, PE

Years of Experience28 years

EducationMEng, Civil Engineelng

BS, Engineering Science

Education33, Civil/Environmental Engineering

License/RegistrationsProfessional Engineer: PA, MD, DE, WV,

VA, Ml, NC

10

Aviation Consulting Sevices Bay B dge Airport - Stevensville, Mayland

Ken BrazeauAirside Planning I Airspace AnalysesYears of Experience33 years

Mr Brazeaus background includes airport planningassignments at numerous general aviation, cargo and air carrierairports as well as assignments involving the planning anddesign of two new airports from inception through planning leveldesign. He has extensive experience in all aspects of airportmaster planning including, airport inventory documentation,Part 1 39 Signage and Marking Plans, demand/capacity analysis,facility requirements analysis, airfield alternatives developmentand ALP development. His expertise includes the use ofAutoCAD Civil 3D to conduct airspace and obstruction analysisstudies, air traffic control tower siting studies, and navigationalaid siting studies.

Recent Experience

Bay Bridge Airport. Project Planner for several airfieldimprovement projects, including Runway 11 safety areaimprovements, Taxiway A extension, new north terminal aprondesign, the Pier One Road relocation, AWOS siting analysis, EAfor the removal of obstructions to the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces.Project Planner in support of numerous updates to the ALP andhangar siting analyses.

EducationBS, Business AdministrationAA, Engineering and Drafting Design

Crisfield-Somerset County Airport. Project Planner forseveral tasks including assisting the county planning staffin review of local, state and Federal Laws and Ordinances,obstruction analyses, update to the ALP set, and alternativesanalysis for ongoing EA for removal of obstructions to the 14CFR Part 77 surfaces.

Easton/Newnam Field Airport. Project Planner for Forecast,Critical Aircraft, and Runway Length Analysis; EA for Five-YearCIP; obstruction analysis; South Apron; ALP Updates; varioushangar analyses; and EA for ATCT.

Cambridge-Dorchester County Airport. Project Plannerresponsible for delineation of obstructions on and around theairport and ALP Update.

Ocean City Municipal Airport. Project Planner for masterplan update, obstruction analyses, numerous ALP updates,alternatives development in support of EA for Five-year CIP andrunway extension analysis.

Recent Experience

Joanna HieblerNatural Resources PermittingYears of Experience22 years

Bay Bridge Airport. Environmental Specialist in supportof EA for the removal of obstructions to the 14 CFR Part 77surfaces for Runway 11-29 and EA for Airfield Improvements.Tasks include wetland field delineations and correspondingcoordination with the County, US Army Corps of Engineers(USACE) and Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE).

Crisfield-Somerset County Airport. Environmental Specialistin support of EA for the removal of obstructions to the 14CFR Part 77 surfaces for Runway 14-32 and Runway 6-24.Coordination was conducted with the County and Critical AreaCommission for impacts to the Chesapeake Bay Critical Area.

Ocean City Municipal Airport. Environmental Specialist/NEPASpecialist in support of EA for various projects included in theAirport’s ACIP. Tasks included wetland field delineations as wellas confirmation of tidal wetland boundaries. Coordination wasconducted with the Worcester County Shoreline Commissionto comply with Worcester County Atlantic Coastal BaysCritical Area Law as well as compliance with the County ForestConservation Law.

Hagerstown Regional Airport. A FSD and Preliminary FCPwas prepared and submitted for the FAA to the MarylandDepartment of Natural Resources for improvements to therunway and taxiway.

EducationMA, Geography

BS, Geography

Mrs. Hiebler is a Senior Environmental Specialist with a EastonlNewnam Field Airport. Environmental Specialistbackground in environmental and earth sciences. She is a in support of EA. Tasks include wetland field delineationsForest Conservation Act Qualified Professional and has more and FSDs prepared for the Airport as well as adjoiningthan 1 9 years of field experience including preparing Forest private parcels in compliance with the Town of Easton ForestStand Delineations (FSDs), Forest Conservation Plans (FCPs), Conservation Ordinance and the Annotated Code of Marylandendangered species surveys, wetland delineations, and Regulations (COMAR) Natural Resources Article, Title 5, Subtitlenatural resource inventories and assessments. Her technical 1 6 and COMAR Title 8 Subtitle 19.writing experience includes preparation for NEPA compliancedocuments including EAs, Environmental Impact Statements(ElSs), CATEXs and Section 4(f) Evaluations, as well as 404(b)(1)documents.

/,ECOF,.’i 11

Aviation Consulting Services - Ba\ Bidge Airport - Stevensville, Ma’yLaid

Availability and Location of Key Personnel

AVAILABLE WORKFORCEProgram Manager Jennifer Lutz’s priority will continue to be

W29 and significant and experienced manpower will be madeavailable for each project task. Her experiences have made her

extremely proficient in managing her day-to-day responsibilities

and, as such, she is more than capable and accessible in

continuing with the duties as the Program Manager for W29.

Her success lies in her dedication and love for her airports by

being available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. She manages

programs with passion and loyalty and thrives when presentedwith any challenge. Her job duties with AECOM consist of those

as a Program Manager for her clients first and foremost and

accordingly, if given the opportunity, W29 will continue to be

her priority. She is additionally supported by a Team of key staff

who are proficient in managing and performing all tasks that will

arise out of this contract, all of whom are equally passionate

and enthusiastic about general aviation and the opportunity tocontinue to work with the County.

In preparing this submittal, we examined our current workload

as well as our manpower commitments over the 2021-2026

period of this contract. Our key staff pledge to provide more

than sufficient resources to ensure timely completion of all work,including making any manpower adjustments on short notice

to meet unforeseen project requirements without sacrificing

quality. Our staff is immediately available, will continue to bededicated to W29 projects on a first priority basis, and will

remain committed to you until their work is completed to your

satisfaction.

AECOM’s complete in-house resources, supplemented by our

local and specialty subconsultants, afford us more than amplestaff availability to handle every project that may be assigned

under this contract. Our Center of Excellence for aviation

projects is Hunt Valley, Maryland and includes over 70 aviation

specialists who work almost exclusively on airport projects.

Jennifer Lutz and the entire Team are all located within this office

and are a short drive away to meet your needs. The large pool

of aviation technical resources within our office enables us tocontinue to meet all your needs efficiently and effectively. Aspreviously illustrated in our Organization Chart, the Project Team

for the contract can fulfill every technical specialty that may berequired under this contract. Our depth of talented staff gives usflexibility to support any specialty requirement that may arise.

AECOM’s office in Hunt Valley Maryland

Jennifer Lutz Program Manager

Andy Jansing-Kaestner, PE QA/QC

Key Staff Availability

% of TimeResponsibility

available to W29

Derek Hollinger, PE

Ken Brazeau

Joanna Hiebler

Engineering & Construction

Airside Planning / Airspace Analyses

Natural Resources Permitting

80%

40%

80%

40%

30%

AECOM 12

Aviation Consulting Sevices - Bay Bridge Aipo’t - Stevensville. Maryland

Experience with FAA and MDOT MAA Funding Programs

The airport environment is unique, exciting, and complex. There

is generally some activity within its boundaries 24-hours per

day, 7-days per week. Airports are important in our overall

national transportation system because each one operates

as a modal interface, providing the means for passengers

and goods to transfer to and from surface vehicles to aircraft,

utilizing a basic processing center, To be effective, the airport

must be located, planned, designed, operated, maintained, and

secured to efficiently and safely provide the required facilities,

processes, and internal interfaces. These facilities extend from

the airport’s landside through the terminal and/or FBO to the

secure operating airside. The distinct nature and components of

these three elements require an understanding and appreciation

of the airport’s overall function.

It is within this operating environment that AECOM presents its

qualifications and vast experience to assist the County in the

implementation of its programs and projects. Implementationof these programs and projects starts with funding, Our Team’sdepth of experience and understanding of FAA’s AirportImprovement Program (AlP) and MDOT MAA’s Special Grant

program is unrivaled. Our Team’s relationships with the FAA and

MDOT MAA are well-established at all levels within the agencies

and allow us to support our clients during their interactions with

these important funding agencies. We have found that having

a solid working relationship with both the FAA- WashingtonAirports District Office (WADO) and MDOT MAA- Office of

Regional Aviation Assistance (ORAA) staff, including theEnvironmental Protection Specialist (FAA-WADO. Genevieve

Walker), Community Planner (FAA-WADO, Jeff Breeden), AirportEngineer (FAA- WADO, Mindy Lee), and Director (MDOT MAA

ORAA, Ashish Solanki), can prove paramount in getting your

projects through the planning, environmental, design, and

construction processes.

Local FAA AlP-funded and MDOT MAA non-AlP Special Grant Projects

ecAlP Gran

TotalI AlP Grant

Project I Total

$189,480$30,000

$1,617,687

$157,000

$1,000$744,527 Cares Act

Environmental Runway 11 -29W29 Remove Obstructions $545,852 Assessment for Airfield $1 20,432 Rehabilitation (Design)

(onsLrucLionJ Improvements Cares Act

Remove Obstructions andRemove Obstructions and rn rove Safet A (L nd

ESN N/A N/A Improve Safety Area (Land $6,103,454 Acq. And Mitigation)a

Acq.) Cares ActRemove Obstructions

W41(Design) $1 43,273 Remove ObstructionsRemove Obstructions $39,391 (Construction)(Land Acq.)Runway 14-32

OXB Rehabilitation and 062 582 Remove Obstructions 2 650 443Improve SafetyArea ‘ ‘ (Land Acq,)(Design) Cares Act $30,000

Remove Obstructions— CGE rzDstructions $216,068 $350,396 ttion)

W29 NewWdhfe Fence$372,777 N/A N/A N/A N/A

ec

Improve RSA (Construction$192,865 - Pkg. 1)

MAASpecial

Grant Total

MAASpecial

GrajJota

T MAAProject Special

GranUotal

Southwest ApronESN Pavement Maintenance

(Construction)

W41 N/A

Remove ObstructionsOXB (Construction and

Mitigation)Airport Pavement

CGE Maintenance(Construction)

AECOM

$84 401 F250 Rapid ResponseTruck

N/A N/A

$2,143,764 N/A

Runway 16-34$1 26,928 Pavement Maintenance

(Construction)

Runway 4-22 ObstructionRemoval - Phase 1

$64,437 (Construction)Taxiway B PavementMaintenance (Construction)Remove Obstructions

N/A (Construction)Remove Obstructions(Construction)

Remove ObstructionsN/A (Land Acq.)

New Wildlife Fence$1 82,639 (Construction)

$389,136

$90,536

$61,700$57,500

$1 54,658

$146,736

13

Aviation Consulting Services - Bay Bridge Airport - Stevensville, Mayland

GRANT PROCESSAs the leader in providing services to the aviation industry,

AECOM offers all aspects of grant assistance. AECOM is astute

in all guidance documents concerning funding including the

FAA’s AlP Handbook (FAA Order 51 00.38D) as well as MDOT

MAA’s Statewide Aviation Grant Program-AlP Eligible Projects,Guide to Grant Sponsors, revised February 2021; StatewideAviation Grant Program-Special Projects, Guide to Grant

Sponsors, revised February 2021 and Program Guidance

#2020-01.

The tables on the previous page provide a list of FAA AlP-funded

and MDOT MAA non-AlP Special Grant projects within the last

three years. We are pleased to say that all projects in which we

have participated have resulted in full funding for our clients,

including W29. We know the documentation and processes

required under the FAA and MDOT MAA grant programs such

that we always submit the applications and reimbursement

requests on-time and are fully ready for project execution.

Steps to Secure FundingPrior to the allocation of eligible funding for any designs or even

preliminary engineering or planning, the funds must first besecured. That statement alone can make or break any airport

development and is essential in progressing a development

program. The AECOM Project Team understands thepartnership between Sponsor, the FAA, and MDOT MAA, and we

routinely assist in accomplishing the steps required to secure

funding.

Development of the ACIP. Programming projects under the

FAA AlP and MDOT MAA-ORAA Grant Programs start at the

beginning of the FFY when the FAA begins the process of

updating its ACIP for the following FFY and beyond. Thus, atthe start of the FFY, once the FAA’s letter detailing the list of

proposed projects that are eligible for AlP funds is received, on

behalf of the Sponsor, we assist in scheduling a meeting with

the FAA, MDOT MAA, and Sponsor. At this meeting, we review

the proposed projects and determine if all Federal application

requirements (environmental, airspace, ALP) can be met by the

grant application deadline. We then prepare meeting minutes

and draft the required letter and documentation for submittal

to the FAA and MDOT MAA outlining the next five years and

beyond of projects. In this letter, we assist the Airport with the

justification, cost estimates, and recommendations for phasing,if required, for funding purposes, as explained below.

As the on-call consultant, we are continually reviewing the

Airport’s facilities, demands, and requirements. Thus, atthis ACIP meeting with the FAA and MDOT MAA, we assist

the Sponsor in identifying and prioritizing critical airport

development and associated capital needs anticipated for the

Airport through placement into the ACIP. We ensure that all

enabling tasks and projects for facilitation of the overall project

are identified and placed into the ACIP with careful attention

to placement of critical path items with respect to availablefunding.

Often there are projects that are not AlP eligible, including

hangar development, rehabilitation of pavement strictly

servicing existing hangars, maintenance, etc. These projects

are to be included in the Airport’s overall ACIP but are noted asnon-AlP-eligible. Some of the non-AlP projects may be eligible

through the State’s program for Special Grants. Additionally,

some of the AlP eligible projects may be pulled out of AlP and

placed into the Special Grant Program, when funding allows,

so as to allow priority federal funding of the Airport’s mainproject(s), referred to as “Overall Development Objectives”

(ODO).

Annual Update of the ACIP. Once projects are identified and

prioritized, we assist the Sponsor in preparation of the requireddocumentation, including an ACIP data sheet for each proposed

project. This data sheet will include a project description,

justification, and cost estimate along with a graphic. Justification

of projects is critical because the demand for AlP funds exceeds

the availability.

The FAA bases the distribution of AlP funds on current national

priorities and objectives. Projects that rate a high priority willreceive higher consideration for funding over those projects

with lower priority ratings. Each FY, the FAA apportions AlP funds

into major entitlement categories such as non-primary and state

apportionment funds. The FAA distributes the remaining funds

to a discretionary fund which are then distributed based on anational prioritization system. The FAA distributes discretionary

funds to projects that best carry out the purpose of the AlP,

with highest priority given to safety, security, reconstruction,

capacity, and standards. We will work with the Sponsor to group

projects accordingly in their ACIP.

When developing the list of projects, a review of all Federal

application requirements should be completed, including, butnot limited to the following:

• ALP. If the proposed project is not listed on the ALP, AECOM

will update the ALP Sheet accordingly through a “pen and

ink” revision. AECOM will continue to work with the County to

ensure that all potential projects that are ripe for action are

placed accordingly on the ALP.

• Rehabilitation Needs. A Pavement Management Plan (PMP)

is used to conduct a budget analysis to help set annual

rehabilitation funding needs. A detailed CIP can then be

developed based on the PCI and subsequent analyses.

AECOM recently completed a detailed PMP for W29;this plan allowed the County to prioritize and plan for the

rehabilitation of Runway 11 -29 (currently under design) with

additional effort for the South Apron programmed in theACIP for the following years.

• NEPA Compliance. For discretionary funding for that

particular FFY, environmental documentation (CATEX or

EA( is typically required by April 30. The County’s main

needs with respect to NEPA compliance have been met

for the currently ongoing programs at the Airport (Airfield

lmprovements(. Should additional projects not evaluated inthe EA come online, AECOM will complete the necessary

environmental documentation.

AECOM 14

Aviation Consulting Services - Bay B’ldge Airoot Stevensville, Ma’vland

• Airspace Determination. Prior to issuance of any design

grant, the FAA will review airspace analyses for the proposedprojects to ensure compliance with standards and the

national airspace system. AECOM routinely submits and/orguides stakeholders in the filing of these airspace cases to

ensure land use compatibility.

• Design Scope of Work. Prior to submittal of the grantapplication, the FAA and MDOT MAA require a design Scopeof Work be submitted and reviewed. The FAA will issue a

letter of concurrence. AECOM has prepared and submitted

dozens of design scopes for projects at W29; all of whichhave received concurrence from the FAA and MDOT MAA.

• Independent Cost Estimate. An Independent Fee Estimate,

review, or cost analysis is typically required by the FAA for

planning, design, construction, or administration servicescontracts that are expected to exceed $100,000 with an

engineering consultant.

• Bids (Construction only). Prior to submittal of theconstruction grant application, the FAA and MDOT MAA

require the Sponsor to go through the bidding process

to allow for a competitive public bid to construct theproject in accordance with the Contract Documents.The construction grant application is then submitted

with the lowest responsive bidder and the Engineer’snotice of recommended award. AECOM, as part of our

bid phase services, assists the County with this requireddocumentation.

Applications for Federal and State Assistance. For AlP

funded projects, we work with the Sponsor in completing the

required documentation to allow for a grant application. AECOM

will assist the Sponsor in preparation of the applicable FAA

forms including Application for Federal Assistance (SF424)and Application for Federal Assistance (Development Projects)

(FAA Form 5100-100). These forms are sent to the FAA-WADO

for review along with a separate transmittal to the MDOT MAAORAA, both accompanied by supplemental documentation forthe proposed project(s). The FAA will provide the Sponsor with agrant offer. AECOM routinely assists the Sponsor in completingthe grant offer in the time period allotted so that full grant

execution is received in a timely manner.

For State-only funded projects, AECOM prepares for and

attends programming meetings with MDOT MAA and Sponsor

to discuss any funding needs. We then work with the Sponsorin completing a grant application in accordance with the Stategrant guidance specifying the description of the project,benefits to be derived, graphic(s) depicting the project! work

limits, photos, costs/bids, project schedule, permit approvals (ifapplicable), and a statement from the Sponsor stating that they

have sufficient funds available to meet project costs and have

compatible land-use zoning in place. AECOM is well versed inthe guidance documents for the State’s funding programs aswell as the Memorandum, dated October 2, 2019, limiting granteligibility to “hard costs” associated with construction projects.

Reimbursement ProcessThe FAA uses a department-wide electronic grant payment

system - Delphi elnvoicing System. This web-based portalallows grantees (Sponsors) to electronically request payment

and monitor payment status. AECOM has been utilizing thesystem on behalf of many airport sponsors and routinelyassists Sponsors with uploading the required Standard Form

(SF) 271 “Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement forConstruction Programs”. In addition, AECOM prepares thecover letters to accompany the FAA SF 271 and parallel requestfor reimbursement to the State for AlP funded projects. Wewelcome the opportunity to continue to act as extension of staff

to the County and assist you in this reimbursement process.

Grant Close Out ProcessOnce your project is ready for close out, AECOM will assist

you with the grant closeout process. The FAA has published

a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for AdministrativeCloseout for Airport Improvement Program Grants (effective

October 1, 2017). This SOP established a uniform procedurefor closure of AlP grants; the requirements are detailed in theAlP Handbook. The requirements to accomplish those stepsvary depending on the type of grant received (planning, landacquisition, equipment acquisition, or construction). Once therequirements are met, the Sponsor must prepare the closeout

documentation including: a final financial report (SF 425); finalSF 271,final vendor invoices, and any additional project specific

documentation, as stipulated in the AlP Handbook.

Once the SF 425 is accepted by the FAA, the Sponsor maysubmit a final SF 271 through Delphi. At times, the FAA-WADOprefers to see a final “draft” of the final pay request (SF 271) prior

to uploading to ensure that the final federal share is accuratelydepicted. We routinely coordinate with the FAA as well as MDOT

MAA on final reimbursement amounts prior to final request.In addition, all quarterly reports must be completed. Onceall documentation is in place, the FAA then will issue a grant

closeout letter.

C

By Brd9e Airport

AECOM

Aviation Consulting Sevces - Bay Bridge Airport - Stevensville, Maryland

AOngoing Projects

The AECOM Project Team is currently providing aviation consulting services for several local airport clients in the region. A brief

description of our ongoing projects indicating location, scope, budget, expected completion date, and reference information is

included herein.

AECOM AECOMContact Information: Pre-Design for Rehabilitation of Runway 1 1-29Linda Steiner, Airport Manager Bay Bridge Airport, Stevensville, Maryland410.643.4364LSteiner©qac org General Scope: The Scope of Work includes preliminary design services. The design package

, includes the full reconstruction of Runway 1 1 -29, rehabilitation of the 3 taxiway connectors,Budget: $186,000 (fee) installation of new PAPIs and REILs, installation of new airfield signage and lighting, demolition

Est Completion Dar 8/2021 of the Runway 29 end aligned taxiway and 2 associated connector taxiways, construction of2 new connector taxiways to the Runway 29 threshold, and construction of a new Runway 29end hold pad.

Contact Information: Remove Obstructions (RW 4-22 and RW 1 5-33): Land Acquisition ServicesMicah Risher, Airport Manager Easton/Newnam Field Airport, Easton, Maryland

MRishertalb ovorGeneral Scope: The Scope of Work includes avigation easement acquisitions or Access and

@ g . gRemoval Agreements associated with the removal of obstructions to the 14 CFR Part 77

Budget: $627,000 (fee) (RW 4-22) / surfaces of Runway 4-22 and Runway 1 5-33. Obstructions to the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces to$248,000 (fee) (RW 1 533) Runway 4-22, and Runway 1 5-33 are located on-Airport and on forty-one (41) and eighteen

Est. Completion Date: 1 2/2021 (18) off-Airport parcels, respectively.

Contact Information: Runway Protection Zone (RW 4-22): Land Acquisition ServicesMicah Risher, Airport Manager Easton/Newnam Field Airport, Easton, Maryland41 0.770.8055

General Scope. The Scope of Work includes land acquisition services consisting of twoMRishertalbgov.org

restrictive easements and one fee simple acquisition associated with the RPZs of futureBudget. $140,000 (fee) Runway 4-22.

Est. Cor. . tion Date: 1 2/202 1Contact’ nation: Obstruction Removal Program (Phase 1) Construction Phase ServicesMicah Risher, Airport Manager Easton/Newr.n Field Airport, Easton, Maryland41 0.77 0.8055MRishertalbgovorg General Scope. The Scope of Work includes construction phase services for the removal of

. approximately 11 acres of tree clearing and 227 select individual trees for obstructions thatBudget: $55,000 (fee) penetrate the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces of Runway 4-22 located on-Airport, 13 off-Airport

- 1/2021 parcels, and within 2 roadway right-of-ways.

Contact Information: Obstruction Removal Program (Phase 1) Construction Phase ServicesSteve Nuwer, Airport Director Cambridge-Dorchester County Airport, Cambridge. Maryland

cJtogonet comGeneral Scope: The Scope of Work includes construction phase services for the removal

‘ of approximately 1 2 acres of tree clearing and 5 select individual trees for obstructions thatBudget $98,000 (fee) penetrate the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces of Runway 16-34 located on-Airport and 4 off-Airport

Est. Completion Date: 7/2021 parcels.

Contact Information: Runway 14-32 RSA Standards and Rehabilitation Program (Package 1: Improve RSA andJaime Giandomenico Install Localizer/DME), Construction Phase Services443-235-4434 Ocean City Municipal Airport, Berlin, Marylandjgiandomenico©oceancitymd.gov . .

General Scope: The Scope of Work Includes construction phase services for Package 1 ofBudget: $250,000 (fee) the Runway 14-32 program. The bid package includes the installation of a new 14-10 dual

Est. Completion Date: 1 0/202 1 frequency localizer, shelter, and DME, removal of the existing localized and shelter, and massearthwork to improve the RSA of Runway 1 4-32.

AECOM 16

Aviation Consulting Services - Bay Bridge Airport - Stevensville, Maviand

Relevant Projects

SIMILAR EXPERIENCEIn addition to our past and current on-call contracts withQueen Annes County at W29, our AECOM Project Team hasbeen fortunate to work with many similar Airports providingon-call services for many decades. Over this period, AECOM

has completed hundreds of tasks under the on-call contract

format. To fulfill this contract requirement continuously over

these years requires a full understanding of an Airport’s goals

and objectives, facility conditions, operational and maintenance

requirements, long-range plans, and tenant involvement, It also

requires a commitment to meet common goals, offering current

industry insights and application of lessons learned from earliertasks.

Projects that are similar in scope and completed within the lastthree years are included herein,

Ocean City Municipal AirportOn-Call Aviation Consulting Services

Reference’ Jaime Giandomenico, Airport Manager

Town of Ocean City, T: 443.235.4434, E:jgiandomenico©oceancitymd.gov

AECOM is currently serving as the on-call aviation consultantfor the Town of Ocean City, AECOM also provided on-callaviation consulting services to the Town from 2005 to 2012 and

most recently from 2016 to the present. In addition to the taskorder assignments listed below, we continually maintain and

update the Town’s ACIP; develop FAA and MDOT MAA fundingstrategies; prepare grant applications and successfully assistthe Town in competing for FAA and MDOT MAA funding; assistthe Town in responding to requests for information by the public,

local agencies, and state agencies; and prepare pen and inkupdates to the ALP when applicable. Assignments include:

• ALP Update and Report

• Supplemental Runway Alternatives Analysis• Analysis of impacts to Eagles Landing Golf Club with respect

to golf balls and aircraft on approach• Analysis of impacts to wetlands for proposed projects• Analysis for the minimization of land acquisition for various

runway extension alternatives

• Cost analyses of development program• Runway 2-20 PAPI Siting and Installation• Hangar Layout Planning, Design, and Construction• Runway Alternatives Analysis

• Obstruction Analysis of approach to Runway 14• 7460-1 submittals (PAPI and Beacon)• NEPA Documentation for PAPI5, DME, and Hangars• Weather Data Analysis• Planning services with an update to the ALP and

development of a Path Forward for future projects• Preparation of an Airport-wide PMP, geotechnical evaluation,

and an aircraft classification number (ACN) - pavementclassification number (PCN) analysis.

• Environmental services in support of the EA for the Five-YearCIP, including non-tidal and tidal wetland delineations andforest stand delineations.

EC C.C

• Design and construction phase services for rehabilitationand expansion of the West Ramp and new transient aircraft

parking apron• Design and construction phase services for installation of

wildlife/perimeter fencing.• Design and construction phase services for the removal of

obstructions to the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces of Runway 2-20and Runway 14-32 including the creation of off-site wetlandsfor mitigation of impacts.

• Design and construction phase services for Runway 14-32RSA Standards and Rehabilitation Program

• Land Acquisition services in support of Runway 14obstruction removal program including fee-simpleacquisition of various parcels.

• Supplemental EA for runway hold pad

Environmental Assessment for Five-Year CapitalImprovement Program

AECOM provided environmental services to the Town of OceanCity in support of the Airport’s CIP. The environmental analysisand documentation was accomplished in the form of an BA. TheFAA issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on July19, 2017.

The Proposed Action included removal of obstructions andacquisition of associated avigation easements to the 14CFR Part 77 surfaces of Runway 14-32 and Runway 2-20;construction of a standard RSA and Object Free Area (OFA)on Runway 14-32 and rehabilitation Df runway pavement;construction of aircraft storage facilities (aprons, hangars,and connector taxiways); construction of wildlife fencing; andconstruction of Non-Aeronautical Development. A tDtal of 22easements were proposed on off-airport parcels. The ProposedAction will result in direct unavoidable impacts to non-tidal

wetlands, their buffers, and tidal wetlands. Wetland impacts,both temporary and permanent, are estimated to total 35.25acres, with 7.99 acres of buffer impacts.

‘17

Obstruction Removal ProgramAECOM has been providing a variety of services in support ofObstruction Removal Program. Due to the avigation easementsthat are required for the off-Airport parcels, the program wasdivided into two phases (on-Airport and off-Airport). AECOMprovided environmental permitting and mitigation; design; andconstruction phase service for the removal of 34 acres of treeson-Airport. The project included significant environmentalmitigation requirements including plantings along Eagle’s NestRoad to adhere to the Chesapeake Bay Critical Area ProtectionProgram for impacts to the Atlantic Coastal Bays Critical Area;creation of a non-tidal wetland mitigation site; and creation of atidal wetland on-site. AECOM is currently assisting the Town withland acquisition services for the off-Airport parcels containingobstructions; design and removal will occur once “rights” areobtained.

Rehabilitation and Expansion of the West Ramp and NewWildlife Fencing

AECOM provided planning, environmental, design, andconstruction phase services in support of the apron servingHangars F, G, H, I, and J located adjacent to and north of TaxiwayF. Design and construction entailed removal of the existingbituminous concrete pavement, excavation, and reconstructionof a new full depth bituminous concrete pavement section

atop a crushed concrete aggregate base course interlayer overcement-treated subbase course mixed in-place. The projectalso included the construction of a 42-foot wide bituminousconcrete pavement expansion of the west ramp for transienttie down parking positions and 3,300 linear feet of new wildlifeACA fence installation along the south perimeter of the airfield.The project included a significant amount of infield grading,underdrain installation, wetlands remediation, and constructionof a new drainage ditch in support of the project drainage andfuture development.

Pavement Management Program, Runway 14-32Geotechnical Evaluation, and Pavement ClassificationNumber AnalysisThe program included a PMP to assist the airport in determiningan optimum strategy for maintaining all of the Airport pavementsfor the least amount of money with respect to maintenanceallocations and discretionary funding from the airport capitalimprovement program. This included a network level pavementcondition survey of 25 percent of all of the airfield pavementsat the Airport including runways, taxiways, taxilanes, and apron

The Runway 14-32 Geotechnical Evaluation included asubsurface investigation and laboratory testing in order todetermine the existing pavement section thickness andcondition and subgrade conditions and strength. Additionally,this information then supplements the pavement managementprogram by determining whether the existing runway pavementcan be rehabilitated or requires a complete reconstruction withcorresponding earthwork recommendations for design.

The pavement classification number analysis of Runway 14-32, Taxiway A, and the Terminal Aprons included determiningallowable loads on the pavement structures expressed asequivalent traffic for critical aircraft derived from the cumulativedamage factor procedure. This was completed utilizing thetechnical evaluation method in accordance with FAA AdvisoryCircular 1 50/5335-5c, Standardized Method of ReportingAirport Pavement Strength — PCN.

Runway 14-32 RSA Standards and Rehabilitation ProgramThe program includes the RSA stabilization and grading forRunway 14-32, reconstruction and 30-foot shift of Runway14-32, relocation of Taxiway A, and the expansion andreconfiguration of the Terminal Apron, The project adheres toFAA design standards and improves safety by enhancing theRSA and OFA of Runway 14-32; maintains the function, safety,and utility of Runway 14-32 by reconstructing the pavement;adheres to FAA design standards by increasing the runway(Runway 14-32) to taxiway (Taxiway A) separation distancefrom 200 feet to 300 feet, demolishes direct runway accesstaxiways from the terminal apron to the runway, and providesfor the required wingtip clearances from the terminal aprontaxilane to transient small and large aircraft parking positionsand helicopter parking positions. The design is broken into 5construction packages for 5 construction seasons. Additionalcomponents of the project includes the design of a new 14-10dual frequency localizer and DME, PAPIs, REILs, wind cones andODALS.

Aviation Consulting Services Bay B’Idge Airport - Stevensville, Ma”\’lan

•

I..pavements. Additionally, in conjunction with past historicaldata of the pavements and the present condition, the rates ofdeterioration were projected for each pavement section andused to forecast and develop maintenance and rehabilitationmeasures utilizing MicroPaver software.

3DDDDD

DDDD

DDDDDDDDD0DDDDD

D

DD

DDDDDDDD

AECOM 18

Aviation Consulting Services - Bay Bridge Airnot - Steversville, MayIand

Reference: Steve Nuwer, Airport Director, Dorchester County,T: 410.228.4571, E: [email protected]

AECOM has served as Dorchester County’s on-call aviationconsultant at Cambridge-Dorchester Regional Airport undernumerous consecutive contracts with our most recent contractthat commenced in 2018. In addition to the assignments listedbelow, we continually maintain and update the County’s ACIP;develop FAA and MDOT MAA funding strategies; preparegrant applications and successfully assist the County incompeting for FAA and MDOT MAA funding; assist the Countyin responding to requests for information by the public, local

agencies, and state agencies; and prepare pen and ink updates

to the ALP when applicable. Assignments include:

• Planning, environmental, design, and construction phaseservices for a new Technology Park including a 14-acre

regional stormwater management facility.• Preparation of multiple ALP updates, runway length analyses,

and planning efforts in support of the development of theRunway 1 6-34 Improvement Program which included theplanned extension of the runway to 5,400-feet, relocationof Parallel Taxiway to 300-feet runway-taxiway separation,construction of an apron expansion and new vehicle serviceroad, and relocation of Cordtown Road and railroad.

• Completion of an EA for the Runway 1 6-34 Improvement

program including wetland delineations and permitting,Forest Conservation Act compliance, Section 7 consultationwith the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and coordination withthe County and Mass Transit Administration for the railroadand roadway relocations.

• Design and construction phase services for Package 1 ofthe Runway 1 6-34 Improvement program which included

the relocation of Parallel Taxiway from 200-feet to 300-feetrunway-taxiway separation.

• Design and construction phase services for Package 2 ofthe Runway 16-34 Improvement program which included 21new tie-down locations and frontage for future hangars. Thispackage also addressed Runway 1 6 RSA grade issues andalso included the construction of an interior airport vehicleservice road.

• Preliminary design services for Package 3 and Package 4of the Runway 16-34 Improvement program. Package 3included the Cordtown Road and railroad relocations andPackage 4 included the 924-foot runway extension of theRunway 34 end, enabling C-Il design standard status.

• Design and construction phase services for the removal ofobstructions to the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces.

• Design and construction phase services for the crack sealand surface treatment of Runway 1 6-34.

• Design and construction phase services for the installationof 5,500 linear feet of new wildlife fencing.

• Construction phase services for the emergency repair of 2bumps in Runway 16-34 and the mill and overlay of 2 hangar

apron areas.

This project first included the preparation of an ALP Updatewith runway length analysis, comprehensive EA; landacquisition services for the properties required for theextension and associated relocation of Cordtown Road;environmental permitting for wetland impacts; planning,design, and construction of a new 14-acre regional stormwater

management facility to accommodate runoff from the Airportand the Technology Park; and preliminary and final design for the924-foot extension of Runway 16-34, relocation and extensionof the parallel taxiway, and relocation of Cordtown Road.

AECOM then prepared a comprehensive EA for the Five-YearCIP. Key environmental issues evaluated included MarylandForest Conservation Act compliance, endangered speciescoordination, and rail and road relocation. AECOM performedSection 7 consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service forthe presence of the (then) federally endangered Delmarva foxsquirrel and coordinated with the Mass Transit Administration

and Dorchester County for the rail and road relocation requiredto accommodate the runway extension.

Due to funding limitations, the overall development program wasbroken into phases. Package 1 addressed the original paralleltaxiway, which was located only 200 feet off the Runway 1 6-34centerline, in violation of FAA standards for a B-Il airport. Therelocated taxiway was constructed 300 feet from centerline,thus meeting the proposed C-Il criteria. This package alsoconsisted of the expansion of the airport’s existing concreteapron, adjacent to the taxiway. AECOM provided planning,environmental, design, and construction phase services for thispackage.

Cambridge-Dorchester Regional AirportOn-Call Aviation ConsUlting Services

Airfield Development Program

AECOM has provided planning, land acquisition, environmental,design, and construction administration services for thecomprehensive Airport-wide development program underseveral consecutive on-call comprehensive services contracts.The Runway 1 6-34 Improvement Program includes 5,400-footrunway and full parallel taxiway along with a new parking apron

and an interior service road.

AECOM 19

Aviation Consulting Services - Bay Bridge Airpot Stevensville, Mayland

Package 2 expanded the Airports apron and address grading

concerns in the Runway 16 safety area (RSA) The apron was

constructed with 21 tie-down locations as well as frontage for

future tenant hangars. Grading in the Runway 16 safety area

eliminated isolated sinkholes and drainage problems, while

bringing the area into FAA compliance. The construction of

an interior service road from the terminal apron to the Airport

maintenance building was also constructed during this phase.

The road allows airport vehicles to remain off public roads and

provide direct access to the airfield.

Package 3 will relocate the County’s Cordtown Road that is

located off the 34 end of the Runway. Relocating the road

will allow the runway to be extended and provide a full RSA.

Additionally, a railroad, which is currently not in service, runs

adjacent to Cordtown Road; coordination with state, local,

and federal authorities are ongoing with its disposition. Upon

conclusion, a runway length justification will be completed given

the time lapse since initial planning for the extension.

Obstruction Removal Program

Obstructions to the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces for Runway 16-34 were defined in prior planning projects; the County has

been obtaining avigation easements on the off-Airport parcels.

As “rights” have been obtained to remove the obstructions(trees) on select off-Airport parcels, AECOM has then been

providing design, construction administration, and construction

inspection services. The bid package for Phase 1 of this

Program consists of the removal of approximately 1 2 acres of

tree clearing and 5 select individual trees for obstructions that

penetrate the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces of Runway 1 6-34 located

on-Airport and 4 off-Airport parcels. The design additionally

includes 7460-1 forms, erosion and sediment control, wetlandpermitting, topsoiling/seeding, construction safety and

phasing, and site access design and permitting. The remaining

obstructions will be removed on the additional parcels once the

County has secured avigation easements to allow the removal;AECOM will then provide environmental services with a wetland

delineation and processing of the required permit applicationsand associated mitigation coordination, design, construction

administration, and inspection services,

Airfield Fencing Program

The overall airfield fencing program for the Airport has been

divided into phases and is contingent upon the ultimate airfield

configuration. Phase 1 was recently completed with AECOMproviding design, construction administration, and constructioninspection services for the installation of 5,400 linear feet of

8-foot tall fence with 3-strand barbed wire outriggers atop, 3double-swing vehicle gates, and 5 pedestrian gates. This fence

is located along the entire north of the airfield and south alongthe west perimeter of the airfield along Bucktown Road to the

existing slide gate utilized for the access road to the T-hangars.

The design additionally includes 7460-1 forms, erosion andsediment control, construction safety and phasing, site accessdesign and permitting, and local zoning coordination. Phase 2

will commence after required planning and NEPA documentationare completed for installation along the eastern perimeter.Phase 3 will be predicated on the ultimate runway configuration

for the southern perimeter of the airfield.

Pavement Maintenance

As part of the Airport’s overall pavement maintenanceprogram, AECOM has recently provided design, constructionadministration, and construction inspection services for

pavement marking removal, runway cleaning, crack cleaning,crack sealing, P-608 seal coat, and new pavement markings on

Runway 1 6-34.

Should an extension be warranted, Package 4, which has been

designed, would come to fruition and consists of an extension

of Runway 1 6-34 to 5,400 feet, enabling the airport to transition

to a C-Il status.

AECOM 20

Aviatiofi Consufting Services - Bay Bridge AirCort- Stevensvilie, Mayland

Easton/Newnam Field AirportOnCaIl Aviation Consulting

Reference: Micah Risher, Airport Manager, Talbot County,T: 410.770.8055, E: mrisher©talbgov.org

AECOM has been providing planning, environmental, design, andconstruction phase services since 2005 for a variety of tasks

to Talbot County at Easton/Newnam Field Airport. Assignmentsinclude:

• Construction phase services for the 17,000-square yardSouthwest Apron expansion, including construction ofthe apron, relocation of the existing security fence, andconstruction of a new access roadway

• Design, environmental, and construction phase services forthe rehabilitation of Runway 4-22

• Planning, environmental, design, and construction phaseservices for a new ATCT, including a Siting Study EA

• Planning, environmental, design, and construction phaseservices for the installation of airfield-wide signage program

• Planning, environmental, design, and construction phaseservices for the reconstruction and expansion of the SouthApron and Taxiway A (stub) and rehabilitation of landsideservice roads

• Planning, environmental, design, and construction phaseservices for the removal of obstructions to the 14 CFR Part77 surfaces to Runway 4-22, including land acquisition,wetland mitigation, Section 7 consultation with the USFWS,endangered species mitigation, and extensive coordinationwith the Town of Easton in accordance with the Town’sForest Conservation Ordinance

• CATEX documentation for the construction of a corporatehangar.

• Planning services for the siting of numerous hangars• Planning services including analysis fleet mix, critical aircraft,

forecasts, and runway length requirements• Environmental services in support of an EA for the Five-Year

CIP, which includes an extension of Runway 4-22, avigationeasements, hangar development, apron expansion, feesimple acquisition, and obstruction removal to both existingand future 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces of Runway 4-22 andexisting Runway 15-33.

• Design and construction phase services for thereconstruction of the Lower Level Ts Taxilane

• Land acquisition services for acquisition of 62 parcelsthrough avigation easements or fee simple for removal ofobstructions to the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces or land usecompatibility related to the Runway Protection Zone,

• Preparation of an Airport-wide PMP, geotechnical evaluation,and aircraft classification number (ACN) - PCN analysis

• Design and construction phase services for the Southwestapron maintenance

• Design/Build services for non-tidal wetland site creation• Design and construction phase services for pavement

maintenance for Taxiway B

In addition, we continually maintain and update the ACIP;develop FAA and MDOT MAA funding strategies; prepare

AECOR/i

Environmental Assessment for Five-Year CapitalImprovement Program

AECOM has been providing environmental services to TalbotCounty in support of the Airport’s Five-Year CIP since 2005. TheEA received a FONSI/Record of Decision (ROD) on September24, 2018. Proposed Projects included:

• Extend Runway 4-22 feet to the south to a total length of6,400 feet.

• Install a Medium Intensity Approach Light System withSequenced Flashers (MALSF) on Runway 4.

• Construct a partial parallel taxiway and connecting taxiwaysto the new Runway 4 threshold.

• Construct a standard Runway OFA for Runway 22.• Construct aircraft storage facilities (T-hangars, tie downs,

three conventional hangars) and associated aprons.• Construct an Airport Service Road.• Remove obstructions to the existing 14 CFR Part 77

surfaces for Runway 15-33 and Runway 4-22.• Acquire property interests within Runway 15, 33, and 22

Protection Zone )RPZ).

Key issues in this EA included Maryland Forest ConservationAct compliance through the Town of Easton; non-tidalwetland permitting and mitigation with the USACE and MDE;socioeconomic impacts including fee-simple acquisition ofproperty required for the extension and avigation easements forobstruction removal; and an Environmental Due Diligence Auditfor the private property to be acquired via fee simple acquisition.

Rehabilitation of the Lower Level TaxilanesThe project included improvements at the airfield for therehabilitation of the lower level taxilanes and aprons servingHangars F, G, H, and I. Design and construction entailed removalof the existing bituminous concrete pavement, excavation,and reconstruction of a new full depth bituminous concretepavement section atop a graded aggregate base course.The project included a significant amount of infield grading,underdrain installation, wetlands remediation, and construction

a new stormwater management sand filter, treatment basin, andtwo microbioretention trenches.

grant applications and successfully assist the County incompeting for FAA and MDOT MAA funding: assist the Countyin responding to requests for information by the public, localagencies, and state agencies: and prepare pen and ink updatesto the ALP when applicable.

21

Aviation Consulting Services Bay Bridge Airport - Stevensviile, Maryland

Design responsibilities included pavement design, grading

design, paving and geometry design, underdrain design,signage and marking design, construction safety and phasing,

permitting, preparation of construction specifications,preparation of construction cost estimates, and biddingassistance. Construction responsibilities included constructionadministration, inspection, and management providing a directinterface between the Client, regulatory and funding agencies,

tenants, and the Contractor by administering and overseeing

the construction contract.


With the delay in receipt of the FONSI for the EA for the Five-

Year CIP, the County took a risk and forward funded the landacquisition component of the Obstruction Removal Program.AECOM obtained numerous avigation easements and accessand removal agreements.

With over 10 acres of trees located within non-tidal wetlands,AECOM assisted the County in submitting a Joint Federal/

State Application for the Alteration of Any Floodplain, Waterway,Tidal or Nontidal Wetland in Maryland to the MDE and USACE.AECOM also provided program management services for theconstruction of 10.76 acres of a non-tidal wetland mitigation

site. A permit was then issued. In addition, given that the

impacts on many parcels exceeded the threshold of 20,000square feet of clearing, AECOM worked with the Town of EastonDepartment of Planning and Zoning in accordance with theForest Conservation Act. Numerous Forest Stand Delineationsand corresponding Forest Conservation Plans were prepared

and approved.

With receipt of “rights” to clear the obstructions (trees) on manyprivately-owned parcels and mitigation requirements satisfied,AECOM then completed the design for Phase 1 and assistedthe County in securing a construction (removal) grant through

the MDOT MAA Special Grant Program in SFY2O21 . The trees

on these properties were recently removed, including 11acres of clearing and 227 individual trees. AECOM additionallyworked on a joint effort with ESN and the Talbot County Roadsdepartment to recycle the majority of the softwoods removed

as part of these projects in order to chip and recycle as mulch.This Phase 1 of Obstruction Removal is also an enabling phase

to the “Improve RSA” and “Extend Runway 4-22” Programs.

Concurrent to this construction effort (removal), AECOM iscontinuing to assist the County in securing the rights” on theremaining privately-owned parcels. It is the County’s intent

to continue with the multi-phased approach to design andconstruction through the MDOT MAA Special Grant Programuntil all obstructions are removed. Obstruction removals arephased with priority to the existing Runway 4-22 and Runway15-33 approaches as well as the enabling of the Runway 4-22Programs. By removing this Program from the ACIP for receipt offederal funding, the County is then able to stay on schedule withthe “Improve RSA” and “Extend Runway 4-22” Programs.

Improve RSA Program! Runway 4-22 Extension Program

Since completion of the planning analysis conducted in supportof the EA, AECOM has been involved in the continued planning,environmental, and preliminary design of the “Improve RSA” and“Extend Runway 4-22” Programs. The RSA, OFA, and RunwayProtection Zones (RPZs) for Runway 4-22 are not in compliancewith FAA design standards. In addition, the existing runwaylengths at the Airport are inadequate to serve the critical aircraftof the Hawker 800 and Challenger 300/350 series (future). Sincethe resultant alternative involves two distinct objectives, AECOMhas worked with the County, FAA, and MDOT MAA to designand construct the programs together despite the programsare tracked and subsequently will compete for funding as twoseparate ODOs. Given the estimated combined constructionprogram totals of approximately $26M, design is intended forthe production of final construction documents with the projectbroken into multiple construction packages to meet anticipatedthresholds.

I kJ: 11-i

AECOM 22

Aviation Consulting Services- Bay B’ldge AVoort - StevensviHe, Ma-yiand

Crisfield-Somerset County AirportOn-Call Aviation Consulting Services

Reference: Doug Taylor, County Administrator, Somerset County,T: 410.651.0320, E: dtaylorsomersetmd.us

AECOM has been providing planning, environmental, design, andconstruction phase services for over two decades at CrisfieldSomerset County Airport. In addition to the assignments listedbelow, we continually maintain and update the County’s ACIP;develop FAA and MDOT MAA funding strategies: prepare grantapplications and successfully assist the County in competing for

FAA and MDOT MAA funding; assist the County in responding torequests for information by the public, local agencies, and stateagencies; and prepare pen and ink updates to the ALP whenapplicable. Assignments include:

• Preparation of a Comprehensive Master Plan• Preparation of a runway extension feasibility analysis• Preparation of an EA for the runway extension and related

improvements• Identification of obstructions to the 14 CFR Part]] surfaces• Design and construction phase services for a runway

sealcoat and NAVAID installation, including Runway EndIdentifier Lights (REILs) and Precision Approach PathIndicators (PAPIs).

• Update to the ALP and development of a Path Forward forfuture projects

• Preparation of an Environmental Assessment for the removalof obstructions to the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces, including awetland delineation and permitting as well as coordinationwith the County and Critical Area Commission

• Land acquisition phase services for a phased avigationeasement program, for the removal of obstructions to the 14

CFR Part 77 surfaces to Runway 14-32• Preparation of an Airport-wide pavement management plan.• Design and construction phase services for the removal of

obstructions to the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces of Runway 14-32 including the purchase of wetland mitigation credits andcritical area mitigation tree plantings off-Airport.

Pavement Management Program

The program includes a pavement management plan to assistthe airport in determining an optimum strategy for maintainingall of the Airport pavements for the least amount of money withrespect to maintenance allocations and discretionary fundingfrom the airport capital improvement program. This included anetwork level pavement condition survey of 25 percent of all of

the airfield pavements at the Airport including runways, taxiways,taxilanes, and apron pavements in accordance with ASTM

D5340-1 2 and FAA Advisory Circular 1 50/5380-7B, AirportPavement Management Program to determine a pavementcondition index by sampling, inspecting, and identifyingdistresses of each section within the pavement network plan.Additionally, in conjunction with past historical data of thepavements and the present condition, the rates of deteriorationwere projected for each pavement section and used to forecastand develop maintenance and rehabilitation measures utilizingMicroPaver software. Pavements analyzed included Runway

14-32, the entrance taxiway, terminal apron, and hangar apron.Runway 14-32, built in 1949, was noted to be in the worstcondition from a priority perspective and rehabilitation measureswere recommended and subsequently programmed within theAirport’s ACIP.

Obstruction Removal ProgramAECOM is currently providing planning, environmental, and landacquisition services to Somerset County for their ObstructionRemoval Program. URS (now AECOM) identified existing andnear penetrations to the 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces to Runway14-32 and turf Runway 6-24. Penetrations, to the existingand within 10-feet of the surfaces including trees and manmade obstructions, are located on-Airport as well as on 27privately-owned parcels. AECOM completed an EnvironmentalAssessment for the removal of these obstructions. Keyenvironmental issues included Chesapeake Bay Critical Areaimpacts, forested Forest Conservation Act compliance, impactsto Forest Interior Dwelling Bird habitat, and the acquisition of

avigation easements, many of which are residential, The FAAissued a FONSI in June 2016.

Due to the number of parcels involved, AECOM worked withthe County, City of Crisfield, MDOT MAA, and FAA on a phasingprogram for the land acquisition services portion of thisproject to meet available funding. This resulted in the Countyand City closing the turf Runway 6-24 and programming onlythose parcels that contain existing obstructions to Runway14-32. This resulted in a Scope of Services for the acquisitionof 13 avigation easements. The program includes propertyowner notifications and meetings, title analyses, propertyboundary survey, appraisals and review appraisals, acquisitionnegotiations, property easement plats and descriptions, andpreparation of offer packages and negotiations, Upon receiptof avigation easements, AECOM designed for the removal of13 acres of trees to be removed on and off-Airport. AECOMis currently providing construction phase services for the lastremaining parcels included in the overall program.

j

AECOM 23

Aviatio’ Consulting Services - Bay Ridge AVot - Stevensville, Mayiand

Reference: David E. Spaulding, Deputy Director of Engineering &Planning, Susquehanna Area Regional Airport Authority,T: 717.948.3900, E: DSpauldingsaraa.org

AECOM serves as the on-call aviation consultant for HarrisburgInternational Airport. We have completed a range of planning,environmental, design, and construction phase services.Assignments within the last three years have included:

Cargo Apron Expansion. The bid package consists of thedemolition of an existing hangar floor and significant sitework for the 45,000 square yard Portland cement concretepavement expansion of the existing air cargo apron in orderto accommodate 2 new parking positions for B767-400aircraft and 1 new parking position for a 8747-400 aircraft.The project additionally includes the installation of a new3,250 foot long drainage collection system with inlets, atrench drain, glycol diversion vault, oil/water diversion vault,and oil/water separator. The drainage design additionallyincludes microtunneling design for installation of the RCPunder Runway 13-31 and a new outfall box culvert into theSusquehanna River. The project additionally includes therelocation of water, sanitary, and natural gas mains. Projectphasing is developed to make the majority of the expansionarea landside during construction with specific airsidephases requiring taxiway closures, runway nightly closures,

Republic AirportRunway 1 -‘19 Safety Area Improvements

Reference: Denise Authement, PE, Civil Engineer, NY StateDepartment of Transportation, T: 51 8.4858769,E: [email protected]

ERG is an extremely busy general aviation airport located onLong Island, approximately 40 miles east of the City that servesaircraft as large as B737-800s. Runway 1-19 is the cross-windrunway but it also is the runway of choice to avoid noise-sensitive areas. It is classified as Aircraft Approach Category D,Airplane Design Group II. As part of the bid package, AECOMproduced plans, specifications, construction phasing, andestimated quantities for the following key project elements:

• 412-foot runway shift to the north to provide requiredextended RSA

• 412 feet of bituminous concrete runway pavementreconstruction on Runway 19 end

• New Runway 19 end blast pad bituminous concretepavement construction

• Extensive RSA grading off of Runway 19 end• New vehicle perimeter road off of Runway 19 end extended

RSA

and existing cargo apron closures staged to accommodatethe storage on and the continued use of the existing apronby the cargo carriers.

• Trench Drain Grate Evaluation. The project includes astructural analysis of the existing cargo apron trench draingrates to include a determination of the steel grate capacityand the aircraft that it can support with recommendationsfor improvements.

• Signage and Marking Plan Update. The project includesupdates to the signage and marking plan based on a siteinvestigation and inventory of the existing conditions at theairport. The project includes updates to the plan sheets anddevelopment of signage schedules to depict both sides ofall of the existing signs and signage information obtainedfrom the site visit.

• Pavement demolition on Runway lend, including the oldblast pad as well as unusable runway pavement

• New Taxiways G1, G2, G3, and G4 connectors• 1,500-foot realignment of existing Taxiway G north of

Runway 14-3 2 and associated G5 and G6 connectors• New asphalt concrete Taxiway B6 and G4 connectors to

Runway 1 end• New asphalt concrete Taxiway 81 connector taxiway to

Runway 19 end• New pavement marking to support the threshold relocations

including reclaiming 789 feet of displaced threshold on theRunway 19 end, increasing the landing distance available tothe full 5,516 feet

• New runway and taxiway edge lighting, signage, PARIs andREILs to support the threshold relocations

• Significant pavement demolition of unusable pavements toreduce impervious area and meet safety area standards

• 1,100 feet of taxiway demolition and new bituminousconcrete pavement construction including design of apavement section over an existing (to be abandoned(Stormwater management pond with over 15 feet ofembankment

Harrisburg International AirportAviation Consulting Services

.ECC:M 24

Aviation Consulting Services - Bay Bddge Airport - Stevensville, Maryland

The AECOM Project Team has amassed experience at W29, the County, and the Stateof Maryland that far surpasses any rival.

FAMILIARITY WITH THE STATE OFMARYLANDWith our legacy company (J. E. Greiner Company) founded

in the State of Maryland in 1908, our people know the State.Greiner was a Baltimore based civil engineering firm that initiallyspecialized in bridge design; Greiner designed the Baltimore-Harbor Tunnel, Baltimore-Washington Parkway, Chesapeake

Bay Bridge, Governor Harry W. Nice Bridge, 1-70, and Thomas

J. Hatem Memorial Bridge to name a few. With respect totransportation services within the State, we have significant

experience working with numerous agencies; AECOM holds

numerous contracts with various modes of MDOT, including

MDOT MAA, Port of Baltimore, State Highway, and Transit. For

permitting and licensing, we routinely engage MDE, MarylandDepartment of Natural Resources, Maryland Department ofPlanning, and the Maryland Department of Labor.

With respect to aviation, our Hunt Valley office, a legacy Greiner

office, has been providing aviation services in Maryland since

1941. Through our past projects as Greiner and then URSCorporation, we have records and documentation on most ofMaryland’s airports dating back to their original development,including BWI Marshall, originally Friendship International Airport,from the late 1940s.

Our AECOM Hunt Valley office is presently providing on-callengineering services to several clients in Maryland, includingW29. These include services for airports as small as W41 listedin the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS)

as “Unclassified” to airports such as OXB, which is listed byNPIAS as “Local” to “Regional” NPIAS airports such as MTN,

ESN, and CGE to “Small Hub” airports, such as HGR to the

only “Large Hub” airport in Maryland, BWI Marshall, Our Project

Team proposed herein is well versed in the aviation communityin Maryland and contains key staff that are experts in all sizesof airports, ranging from general aviation to large commercialservice.

FAMILIARITY WITH QUEEN ANNE’SCOUNTY AT W29AECOM is intimately familiar with W29 and the County’s culture

and setting serving continuously as your aviation consultant for50+ years. Our Project Team has project specific experiencewith everything ranging from County erosion and sedimentcontrol permitting to construction aggregate producers toasphalt producers/suppliers. With this, our Team has theexperience necessary in order to work with everyone from the

Queen Anne’s Public Works Department, Soil ConservationDistrict, Department of Planning, and Department of Parks and

Recreation to obtain airport site development approvals and

permits including forest conservation, Critical Area, grading, and

stormwater management in order to make your projects happen.

Additionally, with our local experience, we are superior atworking with the MDE on wetland and site development permitsfrom inception through construction oversight recordings.Our local familiarity also extends deep into the construction

community; key staff of the Project Team have been working

in construction on the eastern shore of the Bay the entirety oftheir careers and, as such, have developed positive workingrelationships with large/mid-size site work Contractors such

as Allan Myers, George & Lynch, Inc., David A. Bramble, Inc.,and DXI Construction, Inc. to small electrical or seeding/turfingcontractors. With this construction experience, our Team isapprised of the necessary information in order to accuratelyestimate your proposed projects, develop construction phasing

plans and durations, and develop accurate project and programschedules, which are based on the construction materialsavailable and the Contractors’ capabilities within the Delmarva

region.

AECOF\’L 25

Aviation Consulting Services - Bay B’Idge Airport - Stevensville, Maryland

AECOM has been the County’s aviation engineering consultantfor over 50 years. During this tenure, we have developed a deepunderstanding of the social, economic, and environmentalcharacteristics of the County. More importantly, we understandthe County’s vision, goals, and objectives for the future ofits community and the Airport. The long-term institutionalknowledge of the Project Team will be a great value overthe course of the upcoming contract. Over the courseof five decades, we have completed a range of planning,environmental, design, and construction phase services.In addition to the assignments listed below, we continuallymaintain and update the County’s ACIP: develop FAA andMDOT MAA funding strategies: prepare grant applications andsuccessfully assist the County in competing for FAA and MDOTMAA funding: assist the County in responding to requests forinformation by the public, local agencies, and state agencies:and prepare pen and ink updates to the ALP when applicable.Assignments include:

• Obstruction removal, paving, and navigational aid installation• Reconstruction of a parallel taxiway• Preparation of an EA for proposed development of 24

T-hangars• Preparation of an EA for a proposed taxiway, RSA

Rehabilitation and Terminal Area Development• Design and resident engineering services for the

construction of a crossover parallel taxiway• Design and construction phase services for T-hangar and

taxilane expansion• Land acquisition services for the Airport development

program• Preliminary design, environmental permitting, final design,

and construction phase services for Runway 11 Safety Areaand construction of a full-length parallel taxiway to Runway11-29

• Design, environmental permitting, and construction phaseservices for the relocation of water and sewer utilitiesadjacent to Pier One Road

• Construction phase services for the Pier One Road utilityrelocation

• Final design and construction phase services for the Runway11-29 Threshold Relocation and Seal Coat project

• Financial Analysis of the Airport• Final design and construction of the two-phased

construction of the north airfield apron and the relocation ofPier One Road

• Design and construction phase services for relocation of theAutomated Weather Observation System (AWOS)

• Planning services with an update to the ALP anddevelopment of a Path Forward for future projects

• Preparation of an PA for the removal of obstructions to the14 CFR Part 77 surfaces, including wetland delineations andassociated permitting and mitigation as well as coordinationthe Maryland Historical Trust

• Land acquisition services over five parcels through avigationeasements for parcels containing obstructions

• Preparation of an Airport-wide PMP and a geotechnicalevaluation of Runway 11-29 and the South Apron

• Preparation of an PA and supplemental EA for the Non-Aeronautical Development and amended site plans,including a wetland delineation and associated permitting

• Design and construction phase services for removal ofobstructions to 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces on and off-Airport

• Design and construction phase services for installation of7,000 linear feet of wildlife/perimeter fencing

• Design services for rehabilitation of Runway 11-29

Airfield Development Program

AECOM has been providing planning, environmental design, andconstruction phase services for the comprehensive airport-widedevelopment program under numerous on-call comprehensiveservices contracts with Queen Anne’s County. This expansionincludes the development of a full parallel taxiway, RSAimprovements, a new apron, the relocation of an adjacentCounty road, utility improvements for future development, andrelocation of the FBO and airport offices. AECOM prepared aMaster Plan and subsequent PA for the proposed improvementsat the Airport which are phased with design over multiple years

AECOM

I..,,

Project History at W29

26

Aviation Consulting Services- Bay Bridge Airpot - Stevensville, Mayland

and in multiple packages with multiple construction years.

The overall development program involves socioeconomic

impacts, coordination with the Chesapeake Bay Critical AreaCommission and associated mitigation, wetland impacts andassociated permitting and mitigation, underwater archaeological

investigations, and road relocation. Due to funding restraints, the

overall design and construction has occurred in the following

phases:

• Phase I included a comprehensive plan and constructionpackage to relocate utilities (water and sewer( that wereadjacent to Airport property. Relocation and expansion of theutilities allowed for both future commercial development andexpansion of the airport.

• Phase II of the Airport’s development consisted of RSAstabilization and the full parallel taxiway extension. The RSAstabilization is unique in that it extends into the ChesapeakeBay. Due to the land mass affecting local water currents, overtime the RSA began to erode, resulting in a reduced safetyarea. Because of the sensitive nature of the Chesapeake Bay,AECOM (legacy URS) coordinated with the various Federal,

State, and local agencies for environmental concerns, anddeveloped a detail providing a breakwater condition which

would protect the RSA for years to come. The parallel taxiwayextension was constructed concurrent to the stabilizationwork. By providing a full-length taxiway, the operational needto use the existing S-shape taxiway crossover was reduced.

• Phase Ill began the airport’s relocation of aircraft operations

by constructing half of the new north FBO apron. Phase Illprovided the layout for three eight-unit future T-hangars, aswell as general apron parking to relieve congestion of thecurrent south ramp.Phase IV was a continuation of the Phase I utility relocation,

with the relocation of Pier One Road.Phase V included the construction of additional T-hangarson the new north apron.Phase VI will be an expansion to the new north apron. This

package has been designed to 100%: construction isdependent upon funding.Phase VII will be construction of additional hangars on the

expanded (future) north apron and relocation of the airport

offices and FBO to the north side of the airfield.

North Apron T-Hangar Development

AECOM provided planning, permitting, and design servicesfor the North Apron T-Hangar Development consisting of thedesign/build of three (3) 8-unit, 42-foot wide T-Hangar metalpre-fabricated hangar buildings, associated foundations, andutility services, including water and sanitary for a bathroomfacility and electrical services. The design include all elementsnecessary for the County to complete the hangar procurementand installation, including all power and hangar lighting, NationalFire Protection Association (NFPA) compliance, buildingpermitting, architectural design, structural foundation design,mechanical/plumbing design, construction phasing, and erosionand sediment control.

AECOr,i 27

Aviation Consulting Services- Bay Bidge Airoot - Stevensville, Maryland


AECOM provided planning, environmental, and design services

to Queen Annes County for their Obstruction Removal Program.

AECOM identified existing and near penetrations to the 14 CFR

Part 77 surfaces to Runway 11-29. Obstructions, including

trees, ground, and man-made objects, to the 14 CFR Part 77

surface were identified on-airport as well as on five privately-

owned parcels and a right-of-way along State Route 8.

AECOM completed an EA for the removal of these obstructions.

Key environmental issues included Chesapeake Bay Critical

Area impacts, conversion of both non-tidal and tidal wetlands,

Forest Conservation Act compliance, extensive coordination

with the Maryland Historical Trust, and the acquisition of access

and removal agreements with five property owners. A FONSI

was received from the FAA on December 17, 2015 and

subsequently a permit was prepared, approved, and issued from

the MDE for impacts to non-tidal wetlands. Additionally, credits

were purchased at the Maple Dam Bank for mitigation and

payment was made to the County’s Critical Area Fund for

mitigation for impact to the Chesapeake Bay Critical Area.

Non-Aeronautical Development

AECOM provided planning and environmental services related

to the land located north of Pier One Road. Queen Anne’sCounty purchased 24.835 acres from Wal-Mart Stores East,

Inc. in 2006. Of the 24.835 acres purchased, which includes Lot

1, Lot 2, and Lot 3, 15.774 acres of this land (Lot 1 and Lot 2)are not available for aviation-related use as there is no airfield

access. Lot 1 encompasses 7.663 acres and will continue to

be owned by the County, dedicated as Airport property, and

leased for non-aeronautical development. Lot 2 encompasses

8.111 acres and was released (disposed) from County (Airport)

ownership and sold at Fair Market Value in December 2020, Lot

3, which is located to the south of Pier One Road, encompasses

9.06 1 acres and will continue to be owned by the County,dedicated as Airport property, and used for aeronautical

development.

In accordance with required land release documentation bythe FAA and in compliance with NEPA, on behalf of the County,AECOM prepared several EAs for the release of the Airport

(County)-owned (Federally obligated) land and associated

non-aeronautical development. The initial EA, which received

a FONSI on January 20, 201 5, included non-aeronauticaldevelopment on Lot 1 and the conceptual plans for non-aeronautical development on Lot 2. Modifications to the

site plan for Lot 1 then occurred and a Supplemental EA was

prepared; a FONSI was issued by the FAA on September

22, 2016. AECOM revised the ALP to depict the proposed

modifications. The County then proposed to sell Lot 2 land

(8.111 acres). The ALP was then updated to reflect this

proposed land release and an EA was completed to evaluatethe release (disposal) of Federally obligated land. A FONSI wasissued by the FAA on February 28, 2020. In May 2020, the FAAconcurred that the land was no longer needed for aeronautical

purposes and the release of the land will not interfere with the

operation, maintenance, or future development of the Airport.

The County sold the land in December 2020 and AECOM

assisted the County in completion of the remaining land release

documentation to the FAA.

Since the land was acquired under the AIR the revenue

collected on the lease of the eastern portion (Lot 1) as well asthe proceeds from the sale of Lot 2 are to be kept in an Airport-

dedicated fund to be used for eligible projects at the Airport.

AECOM has assisted the County with coordination with the

FAA and MDOT MAA regarding the funds received. Specifically,the monies will be used to supplement the available AlP fundsallocated for the Runway 11-29 Program which will allow theconstruction to occur within one construction season,

h. .•.•• .

AECOM 28

Aviation Consulting Services- Bay Bridge AVport - Stevensville. Ma,’Land

PROGRAM UNDERSTANDINGAECOM maintains a clear understanding of the County’s goals

and visions for the Airport. AECOM will be with you every step of

the way through your programs. More specifically, we know the

Airport, we have worked with the County to identify and prioritize

projects, and we understand the budgetary limitations and

day-to-day management issues. The planning, environmental,

engineering design, and construction projects the AECOMProject Team has performed at the Airport have given usunparalleled and in-depth knowledge of historical and current

issues that impact the airport’s operation and growth. Our

decades of providing these services to W29 has enabled us todevelop a proven technical approach to ensure that all projects

are implemented successfully.

Airfield Improvements

Based on review of historical documents, Runway 11-29

was initially constructed in 1960 with multiple overlays since

that time and a crack seal and seal coat surface treatment in

2011. The last known maintenance performed on the South

Apron was a seal coat in 2009. Since the structural integrity

of runway and South Apron pavement is crucial to the safe,efficient, and continued operations at the Airport, on behalf ofthe County, AECOM completed a PMP, Aircraft ClassificationNumber (ACN) - Pavement Classification Number (PCN)Analysis, and Geotechnical Evaluation in 2018. Based on

the PMP and associated evaluations, Runway 11-29 and the

South Apron are rapidly approaching the end of their usable

life. Current distresses exhibited from the pavements includerutting, cracking, fatigue, and loss of aggregate. The existing(year 2021) PCI of Runway 11-29 is 43; projected to be 38 by2022. The critical PCls, defined as the condition level belowwhich preventative maintenance is no longer cost effective, is

70 and that for operational maintenance is 56, whereas that

55 and below is considered operationally unsafe. As such,

Runway 11-29 needs rehabilitation due to surface condition

and subsurface issues including groundwater and the existingdeficient pavement section. The existing (year 2021) PCI ofthe South Apron is 29; projected to be 24 by 2022. As such,

7V y , \C -‘

J

the South Apron needs rehabilitation due to surface condition

and subsurface issues including groundwater and the existingdeficient pavement section.

Recognizing the need for rehabilitation, at the direction of theCounty, AECOM completed an EA for the Airfield Improvements,including the rehabilitation of Runway 11-29; rehabilitation andexpansion of the South Apron; the rehabilitation of the Runway

11 -29 connector taxiways; demolition of the 190’ long aligned

taxiway (60’ wide) pavement that coincides with the Runway 11-

29 centerline to the east of the Runway 29 threshold; removal

of the existing connector taxiways to the aligned taxiway;

construction of new Runway 29 entrance taxiways leading to theexisting Runway 29 threshold; and construction of a hold padnorth of Runway 29 on Taxiway A.

‘:1 w:

,/

AECOM 29

Aviation Consufting Services - Bay Bridge Airport - Stevensville, Mayland

As described above, Runway 11-29 is at the end of its usable

life. The surface and subsurface evaluations completed

by AECOM on the existing bituminous concrete pavement

layer both yielded results proving that the existing network

of longitudinal and transverse cracking seen on the surface

extends the full depth of the bituminous concrete pavement

layer. Also, ultra-low CBRs and unstable subgrade conditions

were encountered directly beneath the pavement with notreated subgrade/subbase nor aggregate base materialspresent under the bituminous concrete pavement surface.

The untreated fill and natural alluvial soils beneath the existing

Runway 11-29 pavement exhibited laboratory CBRs as low

as 2.6 which is not sufficient for new pavement section

construction. Additionally, groundwater levels were measured

at 5.0-feet below the ground surface at the time of our

investigations which is indicative to likely present issues during

construction, Due to the presence of seasonal freeze-thaw,

elevated groundwater levels, and ultra-low laboratory CBR

values. improvements to the existing subgrade will be required

as part of the pavement reconstruction. As such, the completeremoval of the existing bituminous pavement is warranted in lieu

of a mill and overlay and as such, a new bituminous concrete

pavement section is being provided as part of our design.

The design is to improve the soil subgrade conditions

under Runway 11-29 by treating the subgrade with cement,

approximately 8 percent of the dry unit weight of the subbasesection volume, mixed in-place with reclaiming a portion of the

existing bituminous pavement materials into the new cement-

treated subgrade section to construct a subbase suitable for

new pavement construction. The proposed Runway 11-29

pavement section will then include the construction of a new

aggregate base course atop the reclaimed soil-cement subbasesection and a new bituminous concrete pavement surface

consisting of two (2) lifts of new pavement construction.

Due to the limitation of Federal funds available for the full

design of the entire Runway 11-29 Rehabilitation and SafetyEnhancements, the design effort has been phased with 30%complete and 45% design currently nearing completion under aFFY2O2O AlP grant and final design anticipated to be completed

by Spring 2022 under a FFY2O21AIP grant. The rehabilitation ofthe runway is programmed for a FFY2022 grant and anticipated

to be constructed in a single expedited construction season tolimit the runway closure duration. Subsequent to the runway

program, it is anticipated that the South Apron will undergo

design with a FFY2023 grant followed by construction in

FFY2024.

North Apron DevelopmentOnce W29 is home to a newly rehabilitated airfield in 2024, it

is anticipated that the demand for additional apron and hangar

space will necessitate the need for the County to advanceprior plans for full build out of the north apron. As noted above,an airport-wide development program was conceived in themid 2000’s; AECOM has provided planning, environmental,engineering, architectural, and construction services for variousphases of this overall development program. With respect tothe north apron development, a 260,000-square foot apron with

21 tie-down was constructed in 2011. In 2016, three (3) 8-unit

42-foot wide T-hangars were then constructed, To the north of

this apron, an additional 208,00 square foot apron with 40 tie

downs and two (2)12-unit I-hangars are proposed. Althoughthe apron was initially designed by our Team, the project wasshelved in 2013 due to funding. Given the time that has lapsed,

a justification of purpose and need will be required to support

this additional apron with an analysis to be completed in an EA.

Following this expansion, the long-term plan is to relocate the

Airport offices to the north side of the airfield, AECOM is excited

to pick up where this program left off and advance it to fruition.

N

/j -‘-“,—FBO/MAlNTENANCE .,

,‘j, E II) / HANGAR (STAGE II) f ‘1IER 0/VEROAD I

LANDSlDEAUTO I\\ ,PARKING (STAGEjI) j

\ rTERMlNALJ-.BUILDING 1 1

“ \(STAGEH)- i 7

\ \ I

-AIRv’\ PARI

4E

57/

1h

AECOM 30

AECOM4 North Park Drive, Suite 300Hunt Valley, MD 21030, United StatesT +1 -410-785-7220www.aecom.com

Statement of Qualifications

Bay Bridge Airport I Queen Anne’s County, MD

Aviation Consulting Services

Due Date: June 1, 2021 02:00 pmBay Bridge Airport Manager, 202 Airport Road, Stevensville, MD 21666

Submitted byMimar Ponte Mellor and Campbell & Paris Joint VentureSecurity Office Park, 7004 Security Blvd., Suite 210, Baltimore MD 21244

P: 410-944-4900, F: 410-944-8044

Table of Contents

A. Cover Letter

B. Introduction and Project Approach

C. Organizational Chart

D. Firni Experience

1. Individual Resumes

2. Example Projects

I

AR CAMPSEU I PAFU$JV

COVER LETTER

V

Elç’Y ç\\c

1

G\c

\

7004 Security Blvd.

Suite 210

Baltimore, MD 21244

El

El

Li

Li

Li

June 1,2021

Ms. Linda Steiner, Airport ManagerBay Bridge Airport Manager202 Airport RoadStevensvilie, MD 21666

RE: Request for Subinittals Regarding Statement of Qualifications Aviation Consulting Services

Dear Ms. Steiner:

Mimar Architects & Engineers, Inc/Campbell & Paris Engineers, P.C. JV (Mimar!C&P JV) is pleasedto submit our Proposal in response to the above referenced solicitation. We are an established JointVenture, with Mimar Architect & Engineers. inc. as the Lead (51%) Venture Firm and Campbell &Paris Engineers, P.C. as the joint venture Partner Firm. Mimar Architects & Engineers, The. is a certifiedDisadvantaged Business Enterprise (UCP #13491). Both firms have comprehensive and extensiveairfield design expertise.

Throughout its 24 year firm history, Mirnar Architects & Engineers, Inc. (Mimar) has providedcomprehensive aviation and architectural! engineering services for hundreds of federal, state,institutional and commercial facilities, with more than 80% of our design work related to on-call/taskorder contracts for public sector agencies as both a Prime and Sub-Consultant. Therefore, Mimar fullyunderstands how to execute both small and large task orders efficiently - carefully considering andmanaging the economic constraints of the project so that results are successfully delivered on time andwithin budget.

Campbell & Paris Engineers, PC has over 38 years’ experience with airport planning and designrequirements, funding procedures, programs, and policies of the Authority and their design staff and theFederal Aviation Administration (FAA).

The Joint Venture will provide full architectural/engineering planning, design services and constructionphase services. The Joint Venture team is comprised of the following sub-consultant firms performingthe described functions and disciplines:

ECS Limited: Geotechnical investigation and engineering, materials and laboratory testing.Precision Measurements, Inc.: Land surveying, underground utility locating and mapping.Pavement Technical Solutions, Inc.: Pavement analysis and design.EA Engineering, Science & Technology, Inc.: Environmental issues.

This team stands ready to fully support any on-site efforts through our staff. We have many TSA clearedpersonnel, and are readily able to perform background checks in support of any badging requirementsfor security purposes required by the solicitation.

The leadership of our Joint Venture is committed to ensuring that this is a highly successful contract.In short, our powerhouse team is confident in our ability to execute your demands for this project. Weeagerly look forward to applying our expertise and depth of resources to this contract.

Sincerely, Mimar!C&P JV

Kal I. Bhatti, AlA, NCARB Managing Joint Venture Partner

CAMPBELL & PARIS JV

INTRODUCTION ANDPROJECT APPROACH

I Evaluation Criteria

I. Introduction and Project ApproachMimar Architects & Engineers, Inc. (Mimar) and Campbell & Paris Engineers, PC(C&P) have formed a Joint Venture, Mirnar Architects & Engineers. Inc. /Campbell &Paris Joint Venture (Mimar/C&P JV) which is submitting this proposal for this importantcontract. Mirnar Architects & Engineers, Inc. (MIMAR) is the Lead Joint Venturer andCampbell & Paris Engineers, PC (C&P) is the minority Joint Venture partner. Bringingtogether the experience and expertise of our respective firms into a single entity allowsfor the maximum benefit to Bay Bridge Airport. Mimar Architects & Engineers, Inc. is aMDOT certified DBE company. Thus, the joint venture entity meets all DBErequirements.

Mimar Architects & Engineers, Inc. (Mimar) is an award-winning architecture,engineering, construction management, and planning firm headquartered in Baltimore.Maryland with branch offices in Washington DC, New York, NY and Harrisburg, PA.Mirnar has provided architecture and engineering services to clients for over 24 years,drawing 70 percent of its work from design task-order inspections and design task ordersand contracts with federal, state, and municipal agencies, acting as prime and sub-consultant. This volume represents services for over 350 conventional architecture.engineering projects, with over 100 for aviation facilities alone. Construction costs ofour projects vary from $10,000 to $50 million, making our best endorsements the repeatbusiness Mimar receives through the consecutively renewed task order contracts. Byway of our 34-person staff of registered architects, professional engineers, constructionmanagers, construction inspectors and technical support staff, Mimar as Lead JointVenture Partner will perform all contract administration and provide projectmanagement and oversight for all of the services and staffing to be provided under thiscontract. Mimar has completed more than 100 task orders for inspection and designservices for Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, Baltimore City, MarylandAviation Administration, WMATA, U.S. Coast Guard and private customers.

Campbell & Paris Engineers, PC (C&P) provides pavement and constructionmanagement inspection as well as design services to the aviation industry. C&P providesclients with practical, cost-effective solutions to complex problems. Our clients includefederal and military agencies, airport authorities, airlines, airport tenants, and state andlocal public works departments. Since 1982, Campbell & Paris Engineers, PC hasprovided services throughout the United States, from Spokane, Washington toBurlington, Vermont and internationally from Iceland to Argentina.

Pavement Technical Solutions, Inc. (PTS) is a full-service pavement engineering,design, management, inspection, testing and evaluation firm dedicated to customerservice and exceptional quality. PTS conducts major pavement projects throughout theworld for a broad range of clientele. PTS was incorporated in March 2010, however,PTS personnel have extensive specialized experience in the pavement engineering fieldand have worked at numerous military airfields and civilian airports, defenseinstallations, high capacity roadway facilities, intermodal ports, and heavy industrialfacilities.

Precision Measurements, Inc. (PMI) offers surveying and engineering services.Established in 1995. we are experienced in all aspects of surveying from cadastral togeodetic. PMI serves a wide range of clients. including municipal, state, and federalagencies. Our staff consists of approximately 70 technical, field, and administrativeprofessionals dedicated to providing superior and technologically advanced surveyingservices nationwide. PMI personnel are typically cross-trained and hold multiple roles,ensuring a solid and continuous work process, as well as superior quality controlthroughout each phase of our projects.

AR CANP*OL I tAlUS fl 2

ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC (ECS) is a premier provider of geotechnical engineering,construction materials testing, environmental consulting, and facilities engineeringservices across Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Virginia. With more than 600employees and over 30 years of experience, ECS is equipped to help clients through theentire project cycle for both the private and public sectors.

EA Engineering, Science and Technology, Inc. (EA) is a scientific consulting firm,dealing with ill-defined problems. EA’s responsibility on this contract will be forenvironmental issues. One of EA’s Core Values—Openness——in its broadest sense,stemmed from our scientific beginning and is now deeply engrained within our culture.Our Openness compels us to define problems deeply, analyze objectively, understand allviewpoints well, communicate respectfully, and generate ideas prolifically. From ourfounding 46 years ago, we have developed an integration competence across theprofessional disciplines of engineering, science, and technology, yielding a distinctability to responsively address the complex challenges that face our clients today. Inaddition, what further separates EA is our capability, indeed our passion, to manage allof this efficiently, with “prudence” and a knack for doing more with less.

Kxpericnce with FAA and MAA Aviation Grant Projects and Their RequirementsThis team has worked at many regional airports and understands the requirements ofboth the Federal Aviation Administration and the State of Maryland relative to airportdesign standards, permitting and plan approval processes, grant application andacquisition requirements. In particular, HD Campbell and Campbell & Paris haveexpertise and extensive experience with the FAA and Washington Field Offices as wellas Maryland Aviation Administration. The firm has processed through many approvalsfor planned improvements at local airports, as is evidenced by the example projects andreferences included herein. Our example projects and the resume projects of our keystaff are representative of the knowledge required in order to obtain the requisiteapprovals.

We are accustomed to the unusual and sometimes difficult schedules that accompanyFAA funding requirements. We have never failed to deliver a project on time andwithin budget to meet AlP funding requirements since our founding in 1982.Our clients benefit from the fundamental understanding of the FAAs national policyposition on issues that affect funding and eligibility. Through the years of projectdevelopment at airports nationwide, this experience has profited our clients on numerousoccasions and we will continue to bring this unique skillset to our projects at yourairport.

In the past 3 years alone Campbell & Paris Engineers has provided services for morethan 150 airport development projects at 50 different locations in 10 different statesvalued at well over one half-billion dollars. Over 90 percent of these airport-development projects were funded by the FAA and all design and planning work wasperformed in accordance with the current FAA standards. We are familiar with anyDOT funding applicable to airports.

The staff has vast experience in agency coordination and regulations in all aspects ofairport planning, including environmental and financial requirements. Achievingconstructible designs and producing complete construction contract documents that willmaximize grant eligibility is directly associated to the experience of our aviation staff.Our staff has dedicated knowledgeable senior professionals whose careers have focusedon the planning and design of airport facilities and the associated AlP program.

cAurtal. a MJSJV

3

The staff routinely attends engineering seminars sponsored by State and FAA officials tomaintain our familiarity with grant eligibility requirements, administrative procedures,and technical design issues. In fact, serving on several Airport Consultants Council andAmerican Association of Airport Executives committees, Campbell & Paris founderH.D. Campbell, Jr. P.E. routinely reviews, comments, and provides industry input to theFAA’s efforts to maintain the highest level of engineering competence and quality.

Project ApproachThe key personnel of the Mimar/C&P JV team consists of numerous key staff supportedby the combined resources of more than 250 staff. This includes construction managersand inspectors, architects, civil, structural, mechanical and electrical engineers, Airfieldpavement designers, evaluators and inspectors, geotechnical investigators and testers,airfield lighting and signage inspectors, underground utility locators, cost estimators,schedulers, and GIS personnel. We understand the nature of the services to be providedunder this contract—many of this team’s sub-consultants have worked on similarcontracts previously, providing outstanding service. The Mimar/C&P JV team is readilyequipped to provide all disciplines required by this important contract. We are diligentand will work to expedite the services and reviews necessitated by this contract. Weunderstand that this facilitates the desired growth of the airport infrastructure andcapacity. The depth and knowledgeable staff provided by this team will ensure the BAYBRIDGE AIRPORT obtains the highest quality and performance results.

a. Overall Management PhilosophyThe Mimar/C&P JV team understands its role in this project to be one in which it keepsparamount the interest of Bay Bridge Airport. The Mimar/C&P JV and the subconsultants deliver superior and comprehensive AE services as requested within thiscontract. We are also committed to staff augmentation should that be necessary.

Mr. Mohammed Ayub, P.E., as the Project Manager, will be responsible for primarycoordination with BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT, staffing levels and the overall smoothfunction of each sector of work to be completed under this contract. He will monitorstaffing levels, and as needed, draw from our extensive support staff as needed to meetadditional demands. Our Project Manager will work in close coordination with allpersonnel to monitor workflow and needs requirements of BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT.The work under this contract requires a “hand on” and practical perspective—and theability to perform discipline inspections and determine practical solutions withconstruction contractors. Our staff are geared toward field experience solutions andpractical applications. Our joint venture will be responsible for all work performed underthis contract. As such we will employ our time-tested methodology for scoping andcompleting project assignments of this nature. Initially, the Project Manager will receivea request for services from BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT. Our project manager andappropriate discipline task leader(s) will quickly meet with the BAY BRIDGEAIRPORT contact to identify the precise scope of work and obtain any other availableinformation. After thoroughly reviewing the requirements of each assignment, theProject Manager will work with any needed sub consultant in order to assign the mostqualified and discipline specific tasks manager and personnel to the assignment. Wecommit to continuity of personnel of all firms which will streamline costs and enhancefamiliarity for each assignment. We will coordinate as necessary and return a clearlywritten scope of work, deliverables, schedule, and budget to BAY BRIDGE AIRPORTwithin the prescribed time limit, or earlier. Our Project Manager will keep tight controlon assignment of man hours and weekly accounting reports will be provided to theProject Manager, Principal and BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT Project Manager for the

IAAR CAPSUJ. S flitS iv

4

budgetary status for each tasklphase.

The Joint Venture team will follow the below listed steps as we respond to each taskrequest. As applicable, reports and construction documents necessary for an assignedtask will be prepared. Please note that Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures areengrained as part of our normal work effort and are further described in the QualityAssurance/Quality Control section. QA/QC lives independently of all other officeassignments.

STEP 1 Proposal Preparation: BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT will receive, as a matter ofcourse, in response to its task assignment:• A concise written recital of the team’s understanding of the task• An identification of the members of the joint venture project team to be assigned tothe task/Project• A list of the technical steps and schedule to be followed in pursuit of the task.Schedule benchmarks” and milestones are clearly set up front with BAY BRIDGEAIRPORT’s approval. These typically include the milestone phases, at a minimum. Onepurpose of our bi-weekly staff meetings is to assess schedule progress and adherence.This is on-going and any needed corrective actions are carefully managed throughout thetask’s duration to ensure the schedule is met as promised. For “rush” situations, the deepbench of our team allows for capacity to be effectively added to meet any schedule.• A proposed feeSTEP 2 Each Task Management Plan is authored by the Project Manager. It is basedon client provided information and presented to him. As noted in the Quality Controlnarrative further below, the Project Manager becomes a defacto quality control managerwho is always on the project.STEP 3 Cursory research for comparable problems and solutions can lead to majorefficiencies and a dramatically improved outcome.STEP 4 This is the project stage set aside for the new thinking that might lead to aspeedy resolution of the task.STEP 5 After potential solutions are generated and the best sorted out, they areformalized and entered into a shared computer database using an effective computer-aided drafting and design program such as MicroStation v8i, ProjectWise, or othersoftware program. Formal notes are kept of any meeting or important decisions made.STEP 6 The Project Manager shares solutions with the full team widely, but thencarefully asks specific, conservative questions of individual team experts, attempting toprove the truly best measures for a task solution.STEP 7 The Project Manager prepares responsibly for every team meeting, circulatingan agenda before the gathering and recording items for after-meeting action.STEP 8 The team writes business correspondence of the highest caliber and with theforemost intention than it be extraordinarily clear and never misunderstood.STEP 9 The team finds the use of “mini-milestones,” interim deadlines for withinwork projects. Meeting each such small deadline keeps the project on time and onbudget.STEP I U At critical phases, the team must pursue rigorous answers to the questionsand comments of the BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT contract review committee. Ourresponses smooth the way for contractor participation in construction and assure that thetask product is not a surprise to BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT.STEP II A final, Project Manager directed. all-document inspection and correctionends the design portion of the Task Management Plan.

a., c..PeoJ. a ?*I, iv

5

Emergency ResponseFurther, each team member understands and is committed to respond in emergencysituations within 24 hours or as otherwise directed. Our team is well positioned torespond to Bay Bridge Airport on an emergency basis should circumstances arise. Uponrequest from BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT, we will have appropriate personnel respond toand augment with any BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT facility throughout the state within 24hours of notification to assist in resolving any issues which may arise on an emergencybasis. Our team members have completed task orders on an emergency basis in the past.All work items will be completed with strict attention to safety in all areas.

A Safety EmphasisIt goes without saying that attention to and training for safety issues will be job #1 for

each and every member of our team. We will be mindful and watchful of problematicsituations which could impact the safety of all. The team understands their safetyresponsibilities, is fully cognizant of FAA and OSHA regulations and requirements andany items will be promptly communicated to the appropriate team or BAY BRIDGEAIRPORT personnel. We will conduct weekly safety “dashboard” meetings to discusson the job safety and to provide continual refreshers so staff will always be alert andsensitive to safety issues. Our open and ready reply communications will provideanswers for our staff should there be any questions. We provide formal and structuredperiodic safety training for our staff, and this will be continuous throughout the durationof this contract.

Describe Procedures of Approach for Coordination Between DisciplinesThe Mimar/C&P JV has teamed with the firms of Pavement Technical Solutions, ECS,Precision Measurements Inc. and EA Engineering, Science and Technology toaccomplish task order work related to AE design, inspections, pavement testing andevaluation, surveying, and geotechnical services. All firms have a long term successfulprofessional relationship of working together in the Maryland area.

Mirnar/C&P iv will work directly with the Airport on a day-to-day basis in accordancewith the scope of work outlined in the RFQ. The success of this contract relationshipdepends on a very simple premise - the ability of the consultant to assure that the“requested services provide the highest level of functional satisfaction at the least costthrough all phases of the project.” Awareness of this understanding and commitment tothis type of contract relationship is our initial step toward providing the Airport therequired level of service to ensure a positive relationship throughout the life of thecontract.

Coordination with the FAA, along with understanding the pavement and taxiwaygeometry design requirements/methodology is a critical component in all projects. Ourteam has a long history of working with the Washington Airports District Office of theFAA. The initial elements of understanding the scope and documenting the consensus ofthe type of product that will be delivered are crucial to managing airport projects. Eachproject that the joint venture performs will have an individual project schedule andphases developed specifically for that project. However, in general, the Airport cananticipate all design/construction projects to have least four basic phases. The schedulebelow is a typical outline for designing and constructing airport infrastructure and will tobe adjusted to meet your needs.

The basic phases include:

I. Phase I: Preliminary Servicesa. Project Kick-off and Roundtable Discussions 6

b. Data Review and Verificationc. Site Analysisd. Preliminary Engineering, Documentation, and Cost Estimatinge. FAA and Coordination2. Phase II: Designa. Roundtable discussion of Preliminary Engineeringb. Preparation of detailed plans and project specificationsc. Provide Final Cost Estimatesd. Final Review and Approvals3. Phase Ill: Biddinga. Provide Bidding Documentsb. Conduct Pre-bid meetingc. Review bids and assist in the preparation of contract documents4. Phase IV: Construction Administrationa. Consult and Advise during construction phaseb. Preconstruction Meetingsc. Coordinate Construction effortsd. Report and Update to Airporte. Daily Inspection Servicesf. Quality Control and Engineering Support Services

A major strength the Mimar/C&P JV has shown in working on past airport projects is theability to design the project’s construction and phasing in a manner to minimize theproject’s impact on airport operations. By utilizing our construction management staff inthe early stages of design, value-engineering concepts are incorporated throughout thedesign process to produce a well-refined construction plan. The expertise and widerange of experience of Campbell & Paris Engineers/Mimar provides valuablecollaborative input to ensure successful panel replacement projects at the airport.

Describe the Quality Control Program and ProceduresWe adhere to an internal Quality Assurance Program, a plan providing the requirementsfor conduct of quality management practices including quality assurance (QA) andquality control (QC) for all engineering and field practices performed by the jointventure. The goal of the quality system is to:

• Establish an effective management system to ensure that engineering programs anddecisions are supported by data of expected quality needed for their intended use and• Provide appropriate quality assured engineering standards and practices for decisionsinvolving the design, construction, and operation of engineering technology.

Our staff follows the requirements and responsibilities described in the QualityAssurance Plan and consults with clients for quality specific requirements to establishappropriate controls necessary to meet specific project needs. Mr. RD Campbell, P.E.will be in charge of the Quality Assurance Program.

The anticipated time schedule, with critical milestones, is based upon a technicalapproach which will be developed as the project progresses. This schedule and theproject requirements will be refined during the project scoping. In analyzing therequirements, the Project Manager and Senior Project Engineer will verify the projectedman-hours and assign the workload accordingly to meet the expected milestones. Allwork in-progress will be monitored by the Project Manager, and resources will be

‘3adjusted as required.

All aspects of the project (including planning issues, milestones, meetings, adjustmentsin the established schedule) will be communicated directly to Bay Bridge

Airport. At any point during the project’s duration, staff members are available toanswer any and all questions BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT may have.

A Critical Path Method (CPM), created using scheduling software Primavera. will beestablished for each individual project, and will be based on the requirements establishedduring the project scoping with the Client. Our Project Manager will be responsible forinitiating each phase of the work at the earliest most practical time. The requirementsand deadlines relevant for each phase of work will be communicated to all involvedpersonnel. In analyzing the requirements, the Project Manager and Senior ProjectEngineer will verify the projected man-hours and assign the workload accordingly tomeet the expected milestones.

Our experience has shown us that the key to successfully completing any project is thecommunication and working relationship between our staff and the Client. Towards thisend, the joint venture is firmly committed to the principles of Total Quality Management(TQM). and is convinced that we have the proper commitment, customer orientation,environment, and personnel to successfully adhere to these principles. This atmosphereof professionalism and cooperation ensures a program that conforms with the highestpossible performance standards while adhering to both schedule and budget parameters.We have always been responsive to our client’s needs and as such have always beencommitted to meeting prescribed submission deadlines. Our history shows that oursubmissions have been on time and that our projects have been completed within theirbudget.

Integral within our management approach are the interactions of our Project Managerand the necessary incorporation of the Quality Control Program this team utilizes for AEprojects. As indicated in our Organizational Chart, Mr. HD Campbell, P.E. is responsiblefor the overall delivery of the Quality Control Program. The project principal, Mr. KalBhatti, will also have overall responsibility for the proper execution of the QualityControl program and its implementation measures by all team members and staff. Ourculture of quality is designed to spread from the highest management levels of the team,downward throughout the team hierarchy. Our system of checks, checklists and back upprovide a minimum of “extra” effort while yielding a maximum value for our clients.Error free work and the necessary documentation and progress information is critical if aproblem should arise. As part of our project Quality Control Plan, Mr. Campbell willhold periodic team meetings to review progress and discuss to resolve any outstandingissues, internal or external to the team.

Our Quality Control Plan standards apply throughout each task, even during taskprogramming, and the Plan directs the Technical Project Manager to perform a qualityassurance examination every two weeks throughout the life of the design anddocumentation period, checking the work of the joint venture and its sub-consultants.The Project Manager files an activity report confirming this has occurred with theQuality Control Manager. The Technical Project Manager oversees continuing documentset coherence and coordination; a technique designed to avoid conflicts. Certain of theseroutine work sessions require generating or evaluating calculations, recording any codecitations, checking detail assembly sketches, or precisely verifying site areas against theprogram. Such interim work products. each governed by a checklist, are passed to theQuality Control Manager for record and for transmittal to the client. For rehabilitationwork, the Task Quality Control Plan checklists specify field confirmation of existing

\conditions and tighten the scope of selective demolition to protect the components thatwill remain or be designated for removal and re-installation, and to ensure that suchprotective measures can be put into place.

• 8CAIP EU. S PAMISS

The Quality Control Plan schedules a major document examination, or IndependentTechnical Review (ITR), at the end of milestone phases. The Quality Control Managerdesignates a senior professional who is not serving on the immediate project team toconduct the ITR. He formalizes a finding of deficiencies that is then recorded by theQuality Control Manager and forwarded to the Project Manager for remedial attention.An edited drawing set and project manual represent the work product of the reviewer.The Project Manager distributes relevant portions of the mark-up to sub-consultants, toguide their fixes. Each error correction is itself recorded on the ITR mark-ups. After allsuggestions for improvement are addressed, the re-assembled ITR mark-up set is filedwith the Program Quality Control Manager for the duration of the project.

Policies On Billing and PaymentsFrom an administrative standpoint, each of our subconsultants execute a writtenTeaming Agreement with Mimar/C&P JV for the contract work. Each formal TeamingAgreement stipulates the project responsibilities and commitments of eachsubconsultant. It also specifies the chain of command within each organization andidentifies internal point of contact for positions relative to this contract. Thus, a cleardelineation and lines of authority are provided for our internal team structure. While theTeaming Agreement is helpful in setting out formal requirements, job duties, our QualityControl Plan and similar responsibilities, it is reinforced by the outstanding workingrelationships these respective companies have with each other from the completion ofprior very successful projects. The Teaming Agreement also establishes administrativepoints of contact between joint venture, and each subconsultant. This includes theaccounting and invoicing point of contact. We will establish an invoicing schedule andset of procedures and distribute to each firm. Invoices from subconsultants will be due10 days prior to the BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT monthly due date in order that jointventure personnel can review each for correctness and prepare the one total invoice thatwill be submitted to the BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT. Likewise, we will ensure thatpayments received from the BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT are promptly distributed to oursubconsultants. Other internal contractual and administrative functions are easilycoordinated with the established point of contact.

Current WorkloadWe have indicated the percent availability in the first sentence of the key staffresumes. This gives a direct indication and commitment that each of thesepersonnel will be dedicated to the contract.

This team includes over 250 professionals who are ready to serve Bay Bridge Airport.The prime joint venture firms are each at a convenient position to assume a greaterworkload as we have major projects that are nearing completion. Likewise oursubconsultants have ample capacity to complete the services necessary to deliver yourproject program. Our respective team provides the depth of personnel and the technicalabilities and disciplines critical to the success of these federal aid projects.

Between our depth of personnel and the commitment of our key staff, the Airport canreadily see that this team bring the capacity to fulfill the contract workload and ensurethat your projects move forward in an expeditious manner. Once underway, ourworkload availability and commitment to personnel will keep each project on track,similar to how we have operated for more than 20 years.

9A.R CAMPOaLI PAFd$JV

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

I

r .

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM

DESIGN TEAM

_____

LEGEND .

-

MCP Mimar Architects & Engineers,Inc/Campbell & Paris Engineers, P.C.Joint Venture

ECS ECS Mid Atlantic Engineers, LLCPMI Precision Measurements, Inc.PTS Pavement Technical SolutionsEA EA Engineering, Science &

Technology, Inc.

Denotes Key Personnel Resume Included

Mimar/ C&P (JV) Team

PRINCIPAL I’. HARGE

KaI I. Bhatti, AlA, NCARB - MCP

PROJECT MANAGER

Mohammed Ayub, PE - MCP

PROGRAM SUPPORT

David A. Jones, PE - MCP

KEY PERSONNEL

ARCI-ITECT5 EIECTC. ENG’NEFRS LAND SURVEYING AND UNDERGROUND IJTIUTIES

Walter Metius, AlA, LEED AP - MCP Mohsen Abdelrahim, PE - MCP Ken Lietz, LS - PMI

Randell E. Henderson, RA, LEED AP, NCARB - MCP Carlos Puerto, PE - MCP Roberto Torres, IS - PMI

Tony Tso,AIA-MCP MECHANICAL ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

CIVIL ENGINEERS W. Larsen Angel, PE - MCP Syed Ali, PE - MCP

* Kerr Chase, PE - MCP Joe Norton, PE - MCP Richard Mallory - MCP

Frank Millian, PE - MCP

“Iyad Isaac, PE - MCPPAVEMENT ENGINEERING ENVIIIONTMENTAL

Al Godley Davis, PE - MCPRobert L. Dodson III - PTS Phillip Donnomyer, PG - ECS

Brian J. Orandello - PTS ‘Robert Rosenstiel, CIH, CSP, CPEA, ASP - EA

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERSDavid Anderson, PE - ECS

Derek Ridinger, PE - ECS

Michael Galli, PE - ECSNicholas Meloy, PE - ECS

STAFF, IGIS/CADD

Nikolas Hill - MCPMichael Carnes - MCP

OUALITY ASSURANCE.QUALITY CONTROL

*HD Campbell, PE - MCP

FIRM EXPERIENCE

I \\ ;: —4...

— j.—

.1••

!:.IS:.. “:. -

1

Kal I. Bhatti, AlA, NCARB

Pri nc I pal - In-Charge

Project Assignment:

Principal-In-Charge

Years of experience:

With This firm: 24

Total: 38

Education:

Masters Architecture (passiveenergy design focus) I

J University of New Mexico;Albuquerque, NM 11987Bachelors I Architecture I

flNatural College of Arts;Lahore, Pakistan 11978

Active Registration:Registered Architect: MD I909811991; ME 1ARC3685 I2010; VA 104010090991992; DCI ARC100943 I

El 2006;NJI21A1OI9O8IOOI2012

Profile:60% available for this project. Mr. Bhatti has more than 37 years ofaward-winning design experience, and specialized expertise inaviation, transportation and municipal facility projects. Notably, overthe past twenty years, he has completed the renovations, additions,modifications, assessments and feasibility studies for many publicand private facilities including projects for MWAA, MAA, MVA,MTA, MdTA, and MPA.

Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall andMartin State Airports, Concourse E Expansion, MAA-AE-12-001,Baltimore, MD (2015 - 2018) Project Principal for overseeingarchitectural, graphic design, lighting and stormwater structures designservices for the 90ft. expansion and renovation of Concourse E. This $90million airport improvement project also encompassed adjacent“connector” corridors to other concourses at the terminal. CC: $90M

Task Order Design Services, Ronald Reagan Washington Nationaland Washington Dulles International Airports and Dulles Toll RoadSystem (2014 - 2018) Project Principal as part of a team for this taskorder contract to oversee architectural! engineering (AlE) design servicesfor design and construction projects at Ronald Reagan WashingtonNational, Airport, Washington Dulles International Airport and DullesToll Road System. CC: Varies: $100,000 - $6.5M

On-Call Comprehensive Design Services for Baltimore Washington!Thurgood Marshall International and Martin State Airports,Baltimore, Maryland (8 Separate Contracts) (2004 - 2018) ProjectPrincipal as part of a team for this On-Call contract to oversee A/Edesign and construction services for projects within the BWI lThurgoodMarshall International and Martin State Airports. Scope of work includedarchitectural design, technical specifications, estimating site inspection,research and development proposed alternative design plans, andcoordination of structural engineering. Tasks Included: (I) BWI MainTerminal and Parking Garage Building Expansion; (2) The CustomerService Building; (3) BWI Bus Maintenance Facility; (4) BWI A/BConcourse Food Courts.

Maryland Aviation Authority Corporate Offices, Linthicum Heights,MD (2013 - 2014) Project Principal for overseeing architectural andinterior design services for the renovation of approx. 10,000sf of officespace within the MAA Corporate Office building located on 991Corporate Blvd. Services included space planning and interior designservices to develop a space to accommodate nine office suites. CC:approx. $500,000

MAA Homeowner’s Association, BWI, Airport’s Noise AbatementProgram (2002 - 2009) Project Principal under three consecutivecontracts to provide comprehensive design and inspection services forMAA at BWI for the Airport’s Noise Abatement Program (ANAP). TheANAP included sound proofing of all homes within a five-mile radius ofthe airport.

a CANFOEIJ. £ PAJflI SW

11

Project Assignment:

QA/QC Manager


With This firm: 38

Total: 51

Education:

3 Bachelor of Science I CivilEngineering I Virginia

] Polytechnic Institute and StateUniversity

3Active Registration:PE: VA, MD, NC, GA, FL,

DMS, OH, VT, SC, TN, IN,TX, LA, IA & PA

H.D. Campbell, Jr., PE

QA/QC Manager

Profile:40% available for this project. Mr. Campbell is the founder of Campbell& Paris Engineers, Inc. and a well-known member of the Virginiaaviation community. He frequently attends professional events andprovides inputs into aviation standards committees for the betterment ofthe aviation industry in Virginia. Mr. Campbell is an experienced experton aviation design matters and will ensure that all FAA/Virginiarequirements will be carefully complied with on all projects. He is alsoan expert in grants and his knowledge will ensure the smoothcoordination of your projects with the requisite governmental agencies.Member: National Society of Professional Engineers, Past President-Airport Consultants Counsel, American Association of AirportExecutives, Airport Counsel International, American Society of CivilEngineers. Society of American Military Engineers

AOPA Apron — Phase 1, Frederick Municipal Airport, Frederick,MD (2018) Design of the taxi lane pavement, site work, possible utilityaccess, stormwater management, and other items associated with thedevelopment of 3 hangars buildings. Pavement Design Engineer. DesignCost $395K

Maintenance Repair and Overhaul Facility, Rafael HernandezAirport Aguadilla, PR (2018) The MRO hangar building providesmaintenance service to the Lufthansa aircraft fleet. Project consists of anew 1,000’ x 500’ concrete apron for A320/737 parking. taxiwayconnectors and peer review of design to comply with FAA and ICAOstandards. Pavement Design Engineer. Design Cost $2 10K

Parallel Taxiway Design, New River Valley Airport, Dublin, VA(2018) Design of 2,500 feet of new taxiway to follow the approved ALPand adhere to current FAA Advisory Circular regulations. Projectincluded the addition of a bypass taxiway and concrete hardstand forheavy jet traffic. Program Manager. Design Cost $276K

T-Hangar Building Complex, Culpeper Regional Airport, Culpeper,VA (2016) Design for a new T-Hangar building complex on anapproximate 5-acre site to provide three new 13-unit nested t-hangarbuildings with porous pavement system for the entire 5-acre site.Pavement Design Engineer and PM. Design Cost $2 13K

North Apron Rehabilitation, Culpeper Regional Airport, Culpeper,VA (2018) Alternative study preliminary and final design, preparation ofcategorical exclusion documentation and design phase services forrehabilitation of north pavement at existing hangars. Role — ProgramManager. Design Cost - $ 180K.

uM CA4PEELL L PARIS IV

12

Project Assignment:

Project Manager


With This firm: 2

Total: 40

Ed U c a tioli:

Masters I Civil EngineeringGeorge Washington University

Bachelors Civil EngineeringRanchi University

El Active Registration:Professional Engineer:

] PA123591E;MD 197451VA 13837

Mohammed Ayub, PE

Project Manager

Profile:80% available for this project. Mr. Ayub has 40 years of experiencein construction phase services and the design of various types ofgovernmental, institutional, commercial and industrial structures. Hehas worked with various types of structural materials including steel,concrete, wood, glulam and pre-stressed structures. His expertiseincludes steel framed composite and non-composite structures,bridges and flat slabs. He also has a background in forensicengineering and has conducted or been a part of several investigationsfor building and bridge structure collapses. He is thoroughlyknowledgeable in all areas and phases of construction services,including construction techniques.

Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall andMartin State Airports, Concourse E Expansion, MAA-AE-12-001,Baltimore, MD (2015 - 2018) Project Engineer for overseeingarchitectural, graphic design, lighting and stormwater structures designservices for the 9Oft. expansion and renovation of Concourse E. This $90million airport improvement project also encompassed adjacent“connector” corridors to other concourses at the terminal. CC: $90M

Forensic Studies for Confidential Clients NationwideLead investigator for casual determination of four structural collapsesinvolving concrete and steel buildings and bridges. The work includedmeticulous site investigations of incident areas, and the compilation andperformance of independent structural analysis in order to identify thecause of failure.

International Nutrition Plant, Omaha, NE Structural Engineerresponsible for a comprehensive review of the structural drawings for anindustrial area that included new and renovation work at the InternationalNutrition Plant. His role was to identify potential areas of cost savingsand sources for ease of constructability improvements.

David Lawrence Convention Center, Pittsburgh, PA StructuralEngineer for review of the structural design of David LawrenceConvention Center. The David L. Lawrence Convention Center is a1,500,000 SF convention, conference and exhibition building indowntown Pittsburgh in the U.S. commonwealth of Pennsylvania.Certified LEED Platinum Facility

San Juan Natatorium, Puerto Rico Structural Engineer to review theroof structure of the San Juan Natatorium, an Olympic-level aquaticsports facility located in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

13AR CIPfl PAWS iv

Project Assignment:

Civil Engineer


1With This firm: 16

Total: 22

Education:

1998 I Bachelor of Science ICivil Engineering I United States

El Military Academy, West Point,NY

2004 Master of EngineeringConstruction Engineering IUniversity of Florida,Gainesville, FL

Active Registration:PE: VA

Kerr Chase,PE

Civil Engineer

Profile:80% available for this contract. Mr. Chase has extensive experience as acivil engineer and field engineer providing construction phase servicesand inspection services for airport improvement projects. Mr. Chase isadept at project management skills and understands the communicationand coordination requirements necessary for a successful project. Heprovides engineering and management services during constructionwhile acting as the client’s representative during coordination efforts.Mr. Chase has experience with design and is also a proficientconstruction scheduler; he also has over six (6) years of experience as anOfficer in the United States Army Engineers, managing and leadingtopographic, construction, and combat engineering projects.

New MRO Facility, Rafael Hernandez Airport, Aguadilla, PR Wrotesite work specifications for MRO facility built by Lufthansa at RafaelHernández. The project utilized a+ 44,900 SY P-501 PCC structuralpavement section, P-40l shoulders, and P-304 cement-treated basecourse. Representative for CPSfor the pavement of facility. Performed submittal review on pavementsubmittals and responded to RFIs. Resident Engineer / Design Cost$2 10K

T-Hangar Building Complex, Culpeper Regional Airport, Culpeper,VA Designed and Resident Engineer for 2, 13-unit T-Hangars and 6,60x60 unit executive hangars, consisted of approximately 30,000 cy ofexcavation, 5’ sidewalk, 4’ apron around each hangar building pad.Engineer / ConstructionManager. Design Cost $2 13K

Reconstruct T-Hangar Taxilanes, Culpeper Regional Airport,Culpeper, VA Design and construction phase services to reconstructnorth t-hangar taxilanes. Reconstructed taxilanes surrounding the northT-hangar complex. Design Engineer/Resident Engineer. Design Cost$3 35K

AOPA Apron — Phase 1, Frederick Municipal Airport, Frederick,MD Design of the taxilane pavement, site work, possible utility access,stormwater management, and other items associated with thedevelopment of 3 hangars each with a 21,600 ft2 area. Design Engineer.Design Cost $395K

AR CAIIPEU. I PARII iv

14

Frank Millien,PE

Civil Engineer

Project Assignment:

Profile:Mr. Millien is an experienced and accomplished civil engineering andairfield design specialist.

AOPA Apron — Phase 1, Frederick Municipal Airport, Frederick,MD Design of the taxilane pavement, site work, possible utility access,stormwater management, and other items associated with thedevelopment of 3 hangars and coordination between town, AOPA andother stakeholders. Design Engineer. Design Cost $395K

T-Hangar Building Complex, Culpeper Regional Airport, Culpeper,VA Designed 2, 13-unit T-Hangars and 6, 60x60 unit executive hangars,consisted of approximately 30,000 cy of excavation. 5’ sidewalk, 4’apron around each hangar building pad. Design Engineer. Design Cost$2 13K

Parallel Taxiway Design, New River Valley Airport, Dublin, VADesigned 2,500 LF of new parallel taxiway pavement, consisted anasphalt design and a concrete design alternative. On-site ResidentEngineer for the construction phase serves of the Parallel TaxiwayExtension project. Design Engineer and Resident Engineer. Design Cost$276K

Reconstruct T-Hangar Taxilanes, Culpeper Regional Airport,Culpeper,VA Design and construction phase services to reconstruct north t-hangartaxilanes. This project consists of the construction of approximately31,000 yd2 of reconstructed taxilanes surrounding the north T-hangarcomplex. It also includes complete reconstruction of the existingdrainage system. Design Engineer. Design Cost $335K

Civil Engineer


With This firm: 13

Total: 13

Education:

2009 I Bachelor of ScienceCivil Engineering

Active Registration:PE: VA

AR CAhPOEULPAJV

15

lyad Isaacs,tECivil Engineer

Project Assignment:

Civil Engineer Profile:40% available for this contract. Mr. Isaac is an experienced civilengineer, with extensive experience in all facets of civil engineering

Years of experience: . . .

work. He has completed all types of civil engineering work, includingWith This firm: 2 roadway design, grading, erosion and sediment control as well as utilityTotal: 20 designs and permit processing services. Mr. Isaac also excels within the

water resources discipline, including’s developing conceptual and final

Education: design for conventional and innovative storrnwater management

Bachelor of Science Civil facilities, application of Environmental Site Design (ESD) and Low

Engineering I Damascus Impact Development measures (LID), storm drain system modeling and

University watershed analysis. He is proficient in the use of the following softwarepackages: AutoCAD Civil-3D, AutoCAD LDD. MicroStation V8 & V8i,and numerous water resources software packages.

Active Registration:PE: MD I 30833, VA 139914 Fort J3elvoir Residential Community, US DOD Mr. Isaac involved in

task management, design, computation, and preparation of constructiondocuments for 30 stormwater management surface ponds, undergrounddetention systems, and low impact development facilities. The analysisincludes assessment of preand post runoffs and stream channel stability and erosion.

MS4 Program, Montgomery County Department of EnvironmentalProtection (DEP) Montgomery County, MD Project Manager forMontgomery County Mary land, Department of Environmental Protection(DEP) involved in preparation of the scope of work, price proposal,coordination with sub-consultants, design team selection, and projectschedule for retrofit of 8 existing storm-water management ponds andI ,500LF of stream stabilization project.

MD 33 (Yacht Club Road to Pea Neck Road), Community Safetyand Enhancement Project, MDOT, Talbot County, MD ProjectManager to provide various improvements along MD Route 33 fromYacht Club Road to Pea Neck Road (approximately 2.5 miles) toimprove pedestrian traffic and increase safety/mobility. The projectincluded walk reconstruction to ADA compliance; drainage facilitiesupgrades and improvements; traffic calming;landscaping and aesthetics; stormwater management; and erosion andsediment control.

MD 4 from MD 458 to D.C. Line Safety and Resurfacing Project,MDOT, Prince George’s County, MD Project Manager to provideprofessional transportation engineering design services for safety andresurfacing 4.2 miles.

16

Project Assignment:

Electrical Engineer


With This firm: 2

Total: 30

Education:

B.S. Electrical Engineering INational University of Colombia

Active Registration:1993 I Registered Engineer IMD #199211993 I Registered Engineer IPA PE077819

Carlos A. Puerto, PEElectrical Enzineer

Profile:60% available for this project. Professional electrical engineer licensed inMaryland and Pennsylvania with over 30 years of experience in thedetailed electrical design for industrial, commercial, and institutionalfacilities including: power engineering studies, construction support.start-up/commissioning, evaluation, and project management of electricalprojects involving power distribution, power plants, substations, controlsand instrumentation involving PLCs and HMIs. fire alarm, emergencygenerators, UPS, communications networks, and security. Mr. Puerto hasextensive experience in all phases of planning, design and constructionadministration for his electrical project work.

Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall andMartin State Airports, Contract Concourse E Expansion, Baltimore,MD (2017 - 2018) Electrical Engineer for architectural, graphic design,lighting and storrnwater structures design services for the 150’ expansionand renovation of Concourse E. This $90 million airport improvementproject also encompassed adjacent “connector” corridors to otherconcourses at the terminal. Different lighting calculations were generatedusing visual software. Different scenarios were also provided to selectthe most appropriate lighting fixtures. Over 40 areas were analyzed usingtridimensional views to better visualize the right location of the lightingfixtures. Lighting levels were set per IESNA handbook 10th edition. TheConcourse E expansion is part of the on-going effort to provide worldclass facilities serving an increasing demand for international travel. CC:$90M

Towson Reservoir Project Upgrades, Towson, MD (2005 - 2007)Electrical engineer responsible for designing lights exterior lighting,including lighting calculations and alternatives selection of the designingexterior lighting calculations and selection of the most appropriatedlighting fixtures. CC: $1 M

The Adelphi, London, U.K. (1995 - 1997) Responsible for the electricaldesign and power electrical system studies (load flow analysis, voltagedrop calculations, short circuit, coordination of protections, andharmonics studies for this comprehensive project. Fee: $500KMD Transit Washington Blvd Electrical Upgrade, Baltimore, MD (2011- 2012) For electrical projects of all modes (Metro, Marc Train, LightRail, & Bus). Project manager providing lighting upgrades for severalfacilities and a solar PV project of 500KW. Perform electrical sub-metering pilot project, arc flash studies using SKM software, andelectrical standards for new projects. Provide technical support andadvice to the MTA to solve any electrical or control problem, reviewof electrical projects designed by consultants, design of electricalupgrades and improvements for MTA facilities. Fee: $500K

US Capitol Visitor Center, Washington, DC. (1996 - 1997)Responsible for the electrical design and power electrical system studies(load flow analysis, voltage drop calculations, short circuit, coordinationof protections, and harmonics studies). Design Services Fee: $700K

WUAR CAIWOELL A ARR XV

17

Project Assignment:

Geotechnical Engineer


With This firm: II

Total: 12

Ed u cation:

2009 Bachelor of ScienceCivil Engineering TechnologyOld Dominion University;Norfolk, VA

Active Registration:Professional Engineer: VA0402054978 I 2015

David Anderson, PE

Geotechnical Engineer

Profile:30% available for this project. Mr. Anderson is the Branch Managerof ECS Chesapeake. He has been practicing geotechnical engineeringand materials testing in Hampton Roads for more than ten years. Mr.Anderson’s experience includes geotechnical engineering forstructure foundations and highway projects, and Special Inspectionsand construction materials testing for a variety of infrastructureprojects. He brings real world solutions to projects through efficient,sustainable geotechnical engineering and common-sense constructionmaterials testing solutions. Mr. Anderson is a Principal Engineerproviding management and review for both geotechnical engineeringand construction materials testing services for local airport projects,including the Accomack County Airport, Wakefield MunicipalAirport, Hampton Roads Executive Airport, and the ChesapeakeRegional Airport.

Accomack County Airport, Terminal Apron Rehabilitation,Accomack County, VA (2021) Project Principal overseeing QualityAcceptance testing services during construction activities for thisterminal apron rehabilitation project. The materials testing programincluded testing and observations associated with earthwork, aggregate,and asphalt testing, cast-in-place concrete testing, and engineeringservices. Fees: $4,385

Chesapeake Regional Airport, T-Hangar Taxiway RehabilitationChesapeake, VA (2019) Mr. Anderson was the Senior Engineer whocompleted the subsurface exploration, oversaw laboratory testing anddeveloped the geotechnical engineering analysis associated with thistaxiway rehabilitation project. The geotechnical services includeddocumentation of the results of the field exploration, laboratory testing,as well as geotechnical engineering recommendations provided to helpguide the project’s design and construction. ECS Fees: $7,260

Accomack County Airport, Apron Rehabilitation Design, AccomackCounty, VA (2019 - 2021) Senior Engineer who completed thesubsurface exploration, laboratory testing and the geotechnicalengineering analysis for design of this taxiway rehabilitation. Theexisting pavement structure showed significant stress and wasrecommended to be removed and replaced; it was also recommended thatpossible stabilization of the upper subgrade soils might be required,depending upon airfield loading requirements. ECS Fees: $8,275

Wakefield Municipal Airport Terminal Apron Design Wakefield,VA (2019) Senior Engineer who oversaw the subsurface exploration andgeotechnical engineering services in anticipation of this terminal apronrehabilitation project. ECS Fees: $5,898

Norfolk International Airport, Passenger Boarding BridgeReplacement Norfolk, VA (2018) Senior Project Engineer whoconducted a subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineeringservices in anticipation of replacement of the Delta passenger boardingbridge.

MAJ CAMPBELL B PARIS JV

18

Project Assignment:

Pavement Management


With This firm: 28

Total: 10

Ed u cation:

] Bachelor of Science CivilEngineering I George Mason

D University 1996

MUAR CAMPSEU. I PAIII JV

J3riaii J. Orandello

Pavement Management

Protile:Mr. Orandello is 50% available for this project. He has extensiveexperience with pavement management systems and all things airfieldpavement related. This includes completion of Pavement ConditionIndex (PCI) surveys and pavement data bases which allow for themanagement of pavement surface areas. He is an expert on pavementtesting methodologies and specializes in non-destructive testing.

Washington International Thurgood Marshall and Martin StateAirports APMS UpdatePTS was a member of the consultant team that completed an update tothe Airport Pavement Management System (APMS) forBaltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (B WI)and Martin State Airport (MTN), both located near Baltimore, Maryland.PTS completed a network-level Pavement Condition Index (PCI) surveyof all airfield and landside pavements at both airports and conducted astructural evaluation of a portion of the airfield pavements includingNon-Destructive Testing (NDT) with their in-house Falling WeightDeflectometer and subsequent analysis. Mr. Orandello’s role wasPrincipal in Charge. Estimated Fee: $490,000

JFK International Airport — Terminal 4 Pavement Maintenance &Management SystemPTS completed an implementation of an Airport Pavement ManagementSystem (APMS) for the Terminal 4 airfield pavements at JFKInternational Airport as the prime consultant. PTS completed a network-level Pavement Condition Index (PCI) survey of all airfield pavementsincluded within the project limits. Additionally. PTS developed aPAVER pavement management database including all inventory, workhistory, and pavement distress data. PTS completed a structuralevaluation of the airfield pavements including Non-Destructive Testing(NDT) with their in-house Falling Weight Deflectometer and subsequentanalysis including computations for Pavement Classification Number(PCN), remaining structural life, and development of rehabilitationalternatives. Mr. Oraridello’s role was Principal in Charge. Fee: $50K

Norfolk International Airport — Airfield Pavement StructuralEvaluationPTS was a member of the consultant team that completed an update tothe Airport Pavement Management System (APMS) for NorfolkInternational Airport. PTS completed a structural evaluation of runwayand taxiway pavements including Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) withtheir in-house Falling Weight Deflectometer and subsequent analysisincluding computations for Pavement Classification Number (PCN),remaining structural life, and development of rehabilitation alternatives.Mr. Orandello’s role was Principal in Charge. Estimated Fee: $65,000

19

Robert A. Rosenstiel, CIII, CSP, CPEA, ASP

Project Assignment:

Industrial Hygienist


With This firm: 19

Total: 24

Education:

2014 Graduate CertificateRecognitionlSafetySciences/Safety ManagementIndiana University of

El Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA

1993 Bachelors I BiologyEl George Mason University,

Fairfax VAEl

Active Registration:Certified Safety Professional(CSP): 2008 20438Certified Professional

U Environmental Auditor,Safety and Health (CPEA):

U 20131907Associate SafetyProfessional (ASP): 2007 IA 13639Certified Industrial Hygienist(CIH): 2019110237 CP

AR CAMPBELL I PARIS JR

Environmental Specialist

Pro file:Mr. Rosenstiel is a Certified Safety Professional and a CertifiedProfessional Safety and Health Auditor who has more than 24 yearsof experience in the profession of safety and industrial hygiene. Hehas an extensive background in the different aspects of theenvironmental health and safety field for both the private andgovernment sectors. Mr. Rosenstiel has worked as a safety consultantin the development of a safety programs.

Environmental Compliance Support, Baltimore/WashingtonInternational Thurgood Marshall (BWI) and Martin State Airports,Baltimore, MD Lead Industrial Hygienist for the asbestos, lead andother lH programs at BWT and Martin State airports. Responsibilitiesincluded managing subcontractors during re-inspection and periodicinspections, database management of the asbestos and lead-based paintdata information and correlation of this information with a geographicinformation system mapping system.

General Environmental Compliance, Baltimore/WashingtonInternational Thurgood Marshall and Martin State Airports,Baltimore, MD Assisted in proposal writing, budget development, andtask management. Performed initial AHERA (asbestos) inspection forBWI including report generation, using access database andcorresponding the data to the Geographic Information System. Leadindustrial hygienist during large demolition and abatement project for anentire pier.

Onsite CIH Support, Ford House Building, Architect of the Capital,Washington, D.C. Appointed responsibilities included technical reviewsand policy development. Specifically, reviewed construction submittalsfocusing on Hazardous Materials and providing recommendationsconcerning safety and IH protocols. Policy development involvedcomprehensive revisions of the agency wide asbestos and lead policiesand originated a standard operation procedure for indoor air quality-specific for the Safety Codes and Compliance division.

Onsite CIII Support, Capital Building, Architect of the Capital,Washington, D.C. Lead remediation of the rotunda required clearancesamples procedures to be overseen by a CIH. Duties required observingthe project supervisor and inspector collecting the lead wipe samples toensure they were collected with specification and regulatoryrequirements; and observing the analysis of the wipe samples via x-rayfluorescence and granted permission, that area was clear for the nextphase.

DC Air National Guard Small Arms Range Former Firing Ranges,U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District Quality control ofonsite remediation activities associated with lead contamination wasperformed in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan forformer indoor small arm firing ranges.

20

1 Project DetailsType: On Call Svcs

Project Size:

Client/Owner:Maryland AviationAdministration

Reference:AECOMAlex Ollerman

El Charles SteenElizabeth Hobby

0 Mike Mezetti

Firm Role:EngineeringServices

Design Completion:2004-2018

Construction:2005-20 18

Construction Cost:$50,000 - $42,000,000

Relevance to

ElProject:Design construction

U Documents

Multi-phased design

And construction

Engineering evaluation/

Cost estimating

j Design FAA Standards

On-site functional

Analysis

Automated designAutoCAD/GIS

[3 Design!Build RFP

Package1

U Knowledge —

Acquisition

On-Call Comprehensive Design Services for BaltimoreWashington/Thurgood Marshall International and Martin StateAirports Baltimore, MD

DescriptionMIMAR provided architectural and engineering services as prime consultant aswell as sub-consultant for capital new construction and rehabilitation!renovation! addition projects which included: design services, assessments,studies and construction management and inspection services for therenovation of several facilities in and adjacent to BWI and Martin StateAirport. MIMAR successfully completed more than 60 task orders. Followingfirms, including Mimar served as Prime on certain tasks:Contract Construction Costs: $50,000 to $42,000,000 (See tasks below)MIMAR Architect & Engineers, inc.Brudis & Associates, Inc.Michael Baker AssociatesWSP (PB America, Inc.)AECOM (URS, DMJM)RTKL AssociatesAirport Design Consultants, Inc. (ADCI)

Tasks completed under most recent Contract (2016— 2018):Concourse A/B Interior and Fire Protection Improvements This project was toenlarge existing hold rooms to accommodate increased occupant load fromlarger aircrafts that carry a great number of passengers. Included addition ofcharging stations for various electronic devices. Work includes interiormodifications consisting of the following: repair of spray-applied fireproofingaffected by the work, metal stud and gypsum board partitions, ceilings andbulkheads, solid surfacing material casework and wainscoting, acoustical panelceiling system, interior painting, tile carpeting, electrical power/lighting, to firesuppression, and HVAC. Fee: $375,000Passenger Boarding Bridge Replacement Replaced 12 passenger boardingbridges at BWI. CC: $7,600,000Terminal I)eck .Ioint Modifications and Miscellaneous Repairs Constructionmanagement services for removal and installation ofjoints on the upper levelroadway, spall repairs to the upper level bridge deck soffits, removal of looselongitudinal joint material, installation/replacements of existing inlets, andinstallation of new pavement markings and maintenance of traffic. CC: $l.IMTerminal B/C Lower Level Fire Suppression and Alarm This project includedthe fire suppression system and fire alarm improvements in the lower levelbaggage handling area, Terminal C data center, and the Observation Gallery.CC: $l.3MRunway 10 Retaining Wall Repairs The repair of a washout at end of Runway10 retaining wall. Fee: $350,000CRCF and BMF Pavement Rehabilitation This project was for full depth HMApavement reconstruction and full depth PCC pavement reconstruction. HMAmill and overlay. Gilsonite based asphalt and emulsion surface treatment. PCCand HMA pavement crack repair and joint sealing. CC: $2,200,000Baltimore Washington International Airport, B/C & D/E Connector ServiceAnimal Relief Area (SARA) Signage and Wayfinding - Baltimore, MD Mimarprovided graphic design and wayfinding services for inclusion of directionaland instructional signage for visitors at the airport on how to get to and how touse the indoor SARA. Used existing signage from outdoor SARAs and ADA

AJ CMPOEU. IM$ Jv 21

On-Call Comprehensive Design Services for BaltimoreWashington/Thurgood Marshall International and Martin State AirportsBaltimore, MD

guidelines to develop a signage system that is comprehensive and can be usedgoing forward. Responsibilities include wayfinding analysis, sign layoutdevelopment, coordination with other disciplines on signage placement, andproduction of sign locationlmessage schedule.MAA Tenant Design Standards The Maryland Aviation Administration (MAA)engaged Mimar Architects and Engineers, Inc. (MAE) to create a moresimplified edition of the MAA Design Standards with a primary focus onsections pertaining to tenant and concession build-outs. This streamlinedmanual describes the design and construction requirements in concise languagefor the use of Designers and Contractors. This exercise entailed a detailedreview of the MAA’s three (3) volume set of standards in comparison to theConcessionaire’s existing Tenant Fit Out Manual along with incorporatingcommentary from the MAA Permit Division to ensure all pertinent scope itemswere addressed.

Large stand — alone tasks from (2007—2012) include:BWI Curbside Expansion and Sidewalks MIMAR worked as an architecture

team member with URS to providedesign and construction documents forthe BWI garage expansion project.MIMAR was responsible for all workrelating to the 400,000 SF expansionincluded major renovations and additionsof new ramps, addition of two floors andalterations of facade facing the mainterminal. As part of the Master Plan, the

top level of the garage was developed as an enclosed Orientation Lobby,overlooking the main terminal and providing access to various terminalsthrough moving walkways and skywalks. Nine glass elevators were also addedto serve each level of the garage and to provide access to the OrientationLobby. On the first level of the garage, existing moving walkway was providedwith a glass enclosure. In addition, 25 existing stair lobbies were also enclosedwith glass vestibules to provide air-conditioned spaces. CC: $42 million1’he Customer Service Building MIMARJ Baker planned and designed the new50,000 sf Customer Service Building, sized for 2020, with central atrium forone stop shuttle. Rental car counters distributed “radially” around the lobby ina mini-mall” concept for parity. The project creates a multi-agency CustomerService Building that affords parity between the respective agencies withregard to customer service and convenience. The primary design conceptbuilding efficiency and customer-friendliness; efficiency of travel andmaximizing comfort from the passenger loading zones to the customer agencyservice space to the ready/return. The building consists of two majorvolumetric elements, a central high atrium surrounded by a one story “U”shaped service space element. CC: $14,750,000BWI Bus Maintenace Facility MIMAR /Baker designed a new 22,450 sf. BusMaintenance Facility on a 12-acre site in close proximity to the rental carfacility. The building provides for administrative space, four maintenance bays,shop space, break rooms, lockers, shower and toilet facilities, parts andequipment storage, maintenance equipment, building support areas, and vehiclewash and detail facilities. Features of the site include a controlled access entry,

22

On-Call Comprehensive Design Services for BaltimoreWashington/Thurgood Marshall International and Martin State AirportsBaltimore, MD

employee parking, and bus staging and cue areas employing a counterclockwise site circulation pattern. Accommodations were made for aCompressed Natural Gas (CNG) facility on-site, which is planned for futureconstruction. CC: $5,612,000

BWI A/B Concourse Food Courts MIMAR partnered with RTKL associates indesigning and planning of the 140,000 SF Concourses A/B Food Court, whichconsisted of mini food courts for the concourses A, B, C, D and B/CIDLandside Terminal and retail space for the existing B,C,D,E and BIC/DLandside Terminal. MIMAR and RTKL developed the design andspecifications for 140,000 square feet of new and redeveloped retail andconcession space, which entailed six new food courts.MIMAR facilitated the consolidation of tenant spaces to a more streamlinedesign utilizing a “mall-approach” design with RTKL/BAA. A minimal designand design concept for an aquatic theme mini-mall/food courts developed byRTKL involved complex curves that became an engineering challenge toconstruct which led to MIMAR’s Senior Architects to take a lead in developingextremely complicated details and construction documents. CC: $6.54M

MAC Building Offices! WarehouseFacility & Air Rescue Fire FightingBuilding Renovations for MarylandAviation Administration. 7001 AviationBlvd., Glen Burnie MIMAR provided fullarchitectural and mechanical designservices, including construction contractadministration, for the renovation of this105,000 SF cargo property near BW1.

MIMAR surveyed the roof, and evaluated, and replaced all the roof drainagecollectors and piping and minimized the number of HVAC units that thegeneral contractor was required to raise up to reach adequate flashing height.Project also included the renovation of a large kitchen and dining areas of theAir Rescue Fire Fighting Building. Cost: $2.23

Four fully automated Triturator Buildings! 13.8 Ky ATS Transfonner and FiberOptics (Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Electrical Utility and IT system)MIMAR provided an architectural and engineering study, and full design andconstruction services for the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, power,and sanitary and wastewater plumbing for these three service buildings at BWI.MIMAR coordinated its in-house design staff with the owner’s representativesand the URS Corporation, MIMAR’s project partner, and specialist electricalpower utility personnel, for two new Triturators (15R) and all attendantautomation. Also, MIMAR oversaw design and installation of 13.8Kv ATStransformer and supporting fiber optic system.The new fully automated systemis designed to allow for simple, clean and efficient disposal of sewage pumpedfrom airplane lavatories system. Cost: $2.3

Due to great track record, MIAIAR has been ii’orking at B WI as prime and subfor the last ten years

•

;i4.r. -.

23

Comprehensive Construction Management and Inspection Services BWI‘ MTN Airpnrft

—jProject Details DescriptionType: On Call Svcs Mirnar Architects & Engineers, Inc. (MIMAR) is currently providing

Construction Management, Inspection, engineering and architectural designProject Size: services under on-call contracts with the Maryland Aviation Administration, as

a sub on two contracts, one with AECOM and the other with Brudis &Client/Ow ner: Associates. Individual tasks include:Maryland AviationAdministration Interior! Exterior Modifications Services (6/2018 — 12/2018) This task included

construction and/or repair services associated with the interior and exteriorReference: modifications of various airport facilities at Bil and MTN.Syed Shariq, R.A.410-859-7506 Comprehensive Pavement Modifications (6/2018 — 12/201 8)

The work under this contract includes the finishing of all supervision, labor,Firm Role: materials, equipment, tools and all associated work necessary forConstruction Management comprehensive paving improvements at Baltimore/Washington InternationalInspection Thurgood Marshall (BWI Marshall) & Martin State (MTN) Airports.

Design Completion: BWI MAA Tenant Design Standards (3/2017 — 8/2017) This project entailedEl 2020 creating a more simplified version of the MAA Design Standards (MAA DST)

with a primary focus on sections pertaining to tenant and concession buildouts.Construction:Ongoing MAA Document Inventory (8/20 18— 1/2019): Mimar provided on-site

document management services to assist with organizing the MA A’s planConstniction Cost: room. Mimar’s on-site personnel performed the inventory, scanning and

Q Varies document/plan organization services.

Passenger Boarding Bridge Replacement: $7.6M. Replaced 12 passengerboarding bridges at BWI.

Terminal Deck Joint Modifications and Miscellaneous Repairs: $1.IM.Construction management services for removal and installation ofjoints on the

Relevance to upper level roadway.Project:

CM Services Terminal B/C Lower Level Fire Suppression and Alarm: $1 .3M. This projectincluded the fire suppression system and fire alarm improvements in the lower

Construction Inspections .

level baggage handling area, Terminal C data center, and the ObservationContractor coordination Gallery.

Claims Assistance

HVAC/MEP/Fire Protecti n

Schedule compliance

Maintenance of Operatioi

24

Project DetailsType:

Project Size:

Client/Owner:Culpeper County, VA

[1 Reference:John Agertson, County

El Administrator540-727-3407

Firm Role:El Prime

Design Completion:2015

Construction:Ei 2016

Construction Cost:$2M

T-Hangar & Executive Hangar Development, Culpeper RegionalAirport, Culpeper. VA

Description

Culpeper County requested design services from Campbell & ParisEngineers for construction phase and design services for a new T-Hangarbuilding complex on an approximate 5-acre site immediately north of theterminal area at the Airport to provide 2 new 13-unit nested t-hangar buildingsand one new 6 unit executive hangar on the site. The project provided for thenecessary site development and t-hangar building plans. The design called foran innovative porous pavement system for the entire 5-acre site, the firstcomplete porous pavement apron at any airport in Virginia. The use of theporous pavement design eliminated the need for a surface pond storm waterretention system that would take up valuable space for future airportdevelopment and would also visually impact the surrounding Historic BrandyStation Battlefield site. The overall development included water, sewer andother utilities necessary to support the new hangar buildings. The result is astate-of-the-art hangar complex for individual aircraft based at the airport. C&Pperforms all CPS as required in FAA grant requirements. The ConstructionPhase Services items included in this project were: field inspections, dailyreports, cost estimates, scheduling, contractor interaction, processing changeorders for both the hangars and the apron. The contract allowed forcoordination of all construction phase services efforts, as subject matter expertsto review submittals, answer contractor RFls, perform on-site inspection, andassist in the production of final record drawings. Tasks also include observingand documentation and providing daily reports on the progress of the work andserving as a liaison between the contractor and the owner and assisted inresolving contractor questions during construction.Fee = $2 13K Construction = $2 Million

Relevance toProject:

Daily reports

Cost estimates

Scheduling

Contractor interaction;

Liaison between

Contractor and owner

On-site inspection

Submittal review

Observation and

Documentation

Construction ph

Services

El Design services 0

25

New River Valley Airport, Dublin, VA

El


Project Size:

Client/Owner:New River Valley Airport

Reference:Keith Holt540-980-4141

El Firm Role:Architectural!

El Engineering Services

El Design Completion:2015

Construction:El 2017

Construction Cost:

Relevance toProject:

On-call contract

Aviation facilities

Multi-discipline A/E

Services

Feasibility studies!

Facility planning!

Programming

Engineering studies

LI Design development

Cost Estimating

Field site surve

U Investigations

CADDServi

DescriptionCampbell & Paris Engineers provided for the planning, environmental servicesand final design of 2,500 feet of new parallel taxiway and associated lightingand signage at New River Valley Airport (PSK) in accordance with currentFAA Advisory Circular design criteria. The design provided for a bypasstaxiway for the Runway 24 end and a concrete hardstand on the bituminousapron for heavy jet traffic use. C&P also provided Construction Phase Services(contract administration and resident engineering) for the $4.4M paralleltaxiway project.

The runway 24 taxiway extension project, the first phase of a two phaseproject, provides a new parallel taxiway to the 6,200’ main Runway 6-24. Thework scope included the excavation of over 225,000 cubic yards of earthwork,which contained 30,000 cubic yards of rock excavation. As the parallel taxiwaydesign was nearing completion, the FAA determined that it would be beneficialto expand the work scope to include removal of a significant terrain part 77obstruction in the same area. Campbell & Paris was able to modify the finaldesign to incorporate the terrain removal and meet the previous designschedule date and bid the project on the original bid date.

The site terrain was such that very little of the excavation was necessary toconstruct the parallel taxiway. To reduce the cost of taking the material offsite, the Campbell and Paris design included placing the excess taxiwayexcavation in an area shown on the master plan to be used as a future hangarsite. The airport is now able to move up the time frame for building thehangars.

26

Project DetalliType:

Project Size:

ClientlOwner:MetropolitanWashington Airports Authority

Reference:El Mark Puttock

Design ProjectU Manager

703-572-0281

Firm Role:Joint Venture


Construction:2010

Construction Cost:$32.7 M

Civil Engineering Design Services — Task Order Washington DutiesInternational Airport Chantilly. VA

Description

Campbell & Paris Engineers Performed andadministered 38 task orders for theMetropolitan lAD & DCAPerformance of all operations in connectionwith site investigations, planning, andengineering studies, topographical andsubsurface surveys, transportation &forecasting conceptual, preliminary, and finaldesigns, and construction phase supportservices for the following:

• Rehab for Temporary Public/EmployeeParking Lot (Red Lot), lAD

• South Employee Parking Expansion, lAD• Hangar Area Site Develop/Contingency

Staging and Parking, lAD• Red Lot / Orange Lot Reconfiguration,

lAD• Ground Transportation Road

Improvements, lAD• New ARFF Station, Response Roads and

Station Utilities, lAD• New North Red Lot, lAD• Cargo Building 6, lAD• Red Lot Parking Expansion (Phases 3A,

3B, 4, 5, & 6), TAD• Perimeter Security Fence and Access

Highway Fence Improvements, lAD• Relocation Air Rescue Fire Facility (ARFF), lAD• Bus Maintenance Facility Phase TB, TAD• Replace Air Traffic Control Tower Water and Sewer Lines, lAD• Metal Shop Storage Building, Shop 2 Area, lAD• Topographical Survey (Apron Area), DCA• Taxi Lot Connector Road, lAD• Natural Gas Line Cathodic Protection, lAD• Graphic Design Services for the Main Terminal Directories, TAD• Climate Control Analysis Salt / Sand Facility, lAD• Pavement Evaluation Taxilane C, lAD• Metes and Bounds Survey, lAD

CAMPDEU. PR3$ JV 27

Runway Rehabilitation, Augusta Regional Airport Augusta, GA


Project Size:

Client/Owner:

u Augusta RegionalAirport

Reference:Gary LeTellier706-798-3236

Firm Role:Prime


Construction:2012

LI Construction Cost:$14.5 M

Description

The latest Pavement Condition Index (PCi)study that was performed on the existingairfield pavements at AGS indicated that thePrimary Runway (17-35), and GeneralAviation and Air Carrier Apron pavementswere on the cusp of major rehabilitation. As aresult, it was determined a full rehabilitation ofthe pavements were recommended, whichincluded preparing Preliminary PavementRehabilitation Design for the Primary Runway17-35 (8,000’ x 150’); General AviationApron; and Air Carrier Apron. Due to funding, it was determined to onlyprepare final Contract Documents associated with the Pavement Rehabilitationof the Primary Runway 17-35. Special coordination efforts were made withAGS and their airfield tenants in order to minimize closure of the airfieldpavements. Thereby using the secondary runway (8-26) as the primary runwaywhen Runway 17-35 was closed for rehabilitation. The final phasing wasdeveloped so the airport could remain operational during business hours byutilizing the secondary runway.

1AR CMInaJ. .PRJ,, JY

28

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING

Queen 160 Coursevall DriveCentreville, MD 21617

Anne’sTelephone Planning: (410) 758-1255

County Fax Planning: (410) 758-2905Telephone Permits: (410) 758-4088

Countt Commtssioners: Fax Permits: (410) 758-3972James J. Moran. At LargeJack A. Wilson. Jr., District IStephen Wilson, District 2Philip L. Dumenil, District 3Christopher M. Corchiarino, District 4

ACTION ITEM

MEMORANDUM

DATE: 22 June 2021To: County Commissioners of Queen Anne’s CountyFROM: Amy G. Moredock, Director, Planning and Zoning

Steve Cohoon, Public Facilities PlannerRE: FY2022 Impact Fee Schedule

Request to Review 18:3 Development Impact Fees

The purpose of impact fees is to require new development to pay its fair and proportionate sharetowards the cost of capital improvements required to support new growth. Impact fees are also charged

to ensure that public facihues are available in a timely and well-planned manner as development occurs.

Queen Anne’s County collects impact fees when new homes or new non-residential buildings are

constructed based on the square footage of the new building. \Vhen new residential construction occurs,

impact fees are collected for Public Schools, Public Parks, and the Volunteer Fire Departments. Nonresidential development impact fees are collected for the Volunteer Fire Departments.

On July 1s of each year, the amount of the residential development impact fee is automatically adjusted

to account for inflationary increases in constructton costs. Section 1 8:3-6.B(1) establishes the utilizationof the most recent twenty-city annual national average data from the Engineering News Record

Construction Cost Index for this inflationary adjustment. This year the increase is 5.9%. Attached is theFY22 Impact Fee Schedule.

This increase is automatic each year; however, Section 18:3-6.C of the County Code allows the CountyCommissioners to waive the inflation adjustment for any given fiscal year retaining the existing feeschedule.

The last Impact Fee Study was conducted in 2006-2007. In light of not only the spike in inflationaryincrease but also in light of data coming to light through various current County project updates such asthe 2021 F-lousing Study, 2021 Comprehensive Plan Update, Adequate Public Facilities, and the \Vater

and Sewer Plan, Staff suggests that the County embark on a review of the impact fee ordinance.

COUNTY COMMISSIONER ACTION

If the County Commissioners are so inclined, the following motion is suggested:

• I MOVE TO DIRECT STAFF TO PURSUE A REVIEW OF THE IMPAcT FEE ORDINANCE PRIOR TO

JUNE 2022.

74

NON RESIDENTIAL

Comm/Shop Ctr 50,000 sf or less

Comm/Shop Ctr 50,001-100,000 sf

Comm/Shop Ctr 100,001-200,000 sf

Comm/Shop Ctr over 200,000 sf

Office 25,000 sf or less

Office 25,001-50,000 sf

Office 50,001-100,000 sf

Office over 100,000 sf

Business Park

Light Industrial

Warehousing

Institutional

QUEEN ANNE’S COUNTYFY 2022 IMPACT FEE REVISION

FY 2022 - July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022

June 2014 - Index 9800

June 2015- Index 10039

June 2016 - Index 10337

June 2017 - Index 10702



June 2020 - Index 11436

June 2021 - Index 12112

INCREASE FACTOR 1.059

Public

Schools Fire Parks & Rec Total

(per sq ft) (per sq ft) (per sq ft) (per sq ft)

Residential $4.90 $0.56 $0.54 $6.00

C))

Reduction Reduction

Total Inside Growth Outside GrowthImpact Fee Area = 50% Area = 25%

1.92 0.96 1.44

1.64 0.82 1.23

1.46 0.73 1.10

1.32 0.66 0.99

2.66 1.33 2.00

2.52 1.26 1.89

2.36 1.18 1.77

2.24 1.12 1.68

2.06 1.03 1.54

1.54 0.77 1.15

0.86 0.43 0.64

0.52 0.26 0.39

75

A

IiI ‘\ I{s 20—city a’erage cost indexes, wages all(1 material iiries. historical

) (Ia14 In(1 (letaiI% (01 ER%I{ 20 LILie% can be found at I{-t n’etonoinh

1913=100 INDEX VALUE MONTH YEAR 1913=100 INDEX VALUE MONTH YEAR 1913=100 INDEX VALUE MONTH YEAR

CONSTRUCTION COST 12112.05 +1.0% +5,9% BIJILDING COST 6876.96 ÷1.8% +10.1% MATERIALS CIT 4434.89 +4.6% +25.3%

COMMON LABOR 24256.31 0,0% +1.2% SKILLED LABOR 10815.82 +0.1% +1.7% CEMENTS/TON 152.89 +0.9% ÷3.9%

WAGES/HR. -- 46.60 0.0% ±1.2% WAGES/HR. 59.78 +0.1% +1.7% STEELS/CWT 62.00 ÷2.2% +11.2%

LUMBER S/MBF 982.80 ÷8.7% ÷60.0%

The Construction Cost lndax annual escalation rose The Building Cost Index was up 10.1% on an annual The MCI rose 4.6% on a monthly basis, while the5.9%, while the monthly component was up 1%. basis, while the monthly component increased 1.8%. annual escalation rate increased 25.3%.

/

ConsLriaction starts in the Seattle metro area areexpected to Ml -1.5% in 2021, to S.5 billion, according to Dodge Data & Analytics. Dodge predictsa 5.9% decrease in non-residential construction,while residential work is expected to drop 3.3%.Office and multifamily construction are expected tosee the greatest declines, while retail and health carework are predicted to increase. -

SOURCE: DODGE Dalw & ANALY’ncS

EN H’s Cost I11(lexes by City

enr.com Juno 7/14, 2021 • ENR • 51

ConstructionCost IndexANNUALINFLATION RATE

Building MaterialsCost Index Cost IndexANNUAL MONTHLYINFLATION RATE INFLATION RATE

S/B ii.

• NON-RESIDENTIAL

• RESIDENTIAL

CONSTRUCTION COST1913=1001967=100R=REVISED

ATLANTA

BALTIMORE

BIRMINGHAM

BOSTON

BUILDING COST COMMON LABOR SKILLED LABOR

JUN’21:1913 %CHILYEAB

‘r7364.39 I ÷9.2

10078.88 +11.1

7861.37 +5.0

16133.45 +9.2

17350.92 +2.6

+ 10.3

+4.4

+7.8

JUN’21:1967 %CHG.YEAR

825.83 0.0

1214.52 0.0

.IUN’21:1913 %C1IG.YEAR

5284.49 ‘ +14.7

6435.50 +20.9

5088.26 +8.3

8609.48 +8.8

8507.81 +6.7

6003.90 +12.9

CHICAGO

CINCINNATI 11162.39

CLEVELAND 12991.45

MATERIALS

DALLAS

JUN’21:17 %CHG.YEAR

728.97 , +2.6

895.57 +3.4

978.68 0.0

1698.09 +6.3

1690.57 0.0

6423.67

DENVER 7933.85

DETROIT 12734.98

1077.82

KANSAS CITY

6634.51 +12.5

5032.99 +10.1

823.99 ÷0.7

1496.53 ÷2.1

1442.24 ÷1.5

907.12 +0.8

+4.8

÷4.8

5536.25

+5.4

JUN’21:1967 %CHG.YEM

1065.51 +27.3

1140.78 +44.1

877.50 +17.2

937.24 +25.6

788.63 +20.1

940.41 +31.3

+29.5

+20.7

1086.20 —0.7

742.23 0.0

LOS ANGELES

MINNEAPOLIS

+7.0

7041.16 +11.3

NEW ORLEANS

818.18 0.0

1068.28 0.0

949.75 +2.8 913.27

738.08 0.0 883.58

12266.38 +5.7

13029.04 +8.1

13581.11 ÷4.0

6957.35 +10.0

20751.01 +1.9NEW YORK CITY

+9.7

7326.41

7074.99 ÷8.0

PHILADELPHIA

1308.17 +0.8

854.73 0.0 854.56 +16.6

1020.67 +1.5 860.34 +30.3

PITTSBURGH

ST. LOUIS

1246.63 +0.7

4937.65 +15.3

10046.38 +5.8

1111.66 0.0

1339.26 0.0

749.82 0.0

1626.07 0.0

1053.90 0.0

14064.70 +2.6

11925.91 ÷9.9

13006.04 ÷4.7

1238.40

901.00 , + 26.4

1051.67 +45.5

0.0

7904.71 ÷5.3

6888.84 +13.3

6942.22 +10.2

653.79 ÷1.2

1456.81 +2.3

1538.40 0.0

1178.28 +5.2

1099.35 +0.3

876.42 +23.9

996.46 +28.6

902.25 +17.5

SAN FRANCISCO 13459.10 +3.4 8165.26 +5.6 1046.50 0.0 1091.49 0.0 1108.30 +15.3

SEATTLE 13165.01 ÷8.4 7090.73 +1O 1210.11 JI.+6,O 1195.72f ÷5.9 1OI58:+14

1356.72 +0.9

1027.72 +4.6

1029.32 +2.2

915.07 +16.1

845.12 +29.4

1003.68 ÷24.2

76

CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS

Prices fiw PVC pipe pIO(1LIC1S rose ill Api’iIafter increasing L2% in Iarc1i, according to theBureau of Labor Statistics’ producer price indexfor plastic construction products, which consistsmostly of PVC pipe. The annual escalation rose to14.2%. ENR’s 20-city average price for both typesof copper water tubing experienced both yearlyand monthly increases in June. Monthly prices for6-in, ductile-iron pipe held steady, while yearlyprices decreased 0.4% since June 2020. All fourtypes of reinforced-concrete pipe experiencedmonthly and yearly increases.

PRODUCER PRICE INDEX

PVC PIPEMonth’y percent change

08—

-2.4—

-4.0 F I

.120 A 0 0 F A20

SOURCE: BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS

ENWs Materials Prices For June 2021

TEM UNIT SPRICE %MONTH ‘OYEAR

Sewer, 46 FT 1.80 ÷11.1 +1 2.0

8” - FT 5.84 +6.1 +12.4

Water, 6” FT 6.32 +5.4 +6.4

8” FT 10.03 +1.1 +2.5

12” FT 18.31 +1.1 +1.4

6” FT 18.81 0.0 —0.4

8” FT 28.24 0.0 —1.9

-

12” FT 44.18 +0.2 —1.4

COPPER WATER TUBING: TYPE LY2” FT 1.88 +3.9 +8.6

1½” FT 7.59 +3.7 +8.5SOURCE: ENS

52 ENR • June 7/14, 2021 enr.com

20-CITY AVERAGE

REINFORCED-CONCRETE PIPE (RCP)

_____DUCTILE-IRON

PIPE

Eo.oMONTHLY DUCTiLE-IRON PIPE

PRICES EXPERIENCEDNO CHANGEIN JUNE.

I-’

469H————--—---- F

466

463H-- - -

S’200 N 0 .J F M A MJ’21

12” FT 18.80 +0.6 +1.0

24” FT 3662 . +23

36’ FT 74.72 +0.1 +0.4

48 FT 125.30 +0.3 +5.7

CORRUGATED-STEEL PIPE (CSP) - -

12” FT 11.96 ÷4.5 +6.1

36” FT 38.94 +5.4 +11.5

60” FT 83.72 ÷5.3 +10.1

POLYETHYLENE PIPE (PE) UNDERDRAIN4” FT 0.75 +1.8 —2.7

PoLyvNyLcFaomoE P

DuciILE-IRON PIPE (DIP) *-

-

77

EM

PEINFORCED-CONCRETE PIPE (ROP)12” FT

24’ . FT

36” FT

48” FT

CORRUGATED-STEEL PIPE (CSP)12’ - FT

36” FT

60” FT

POLYETHYLENE PIPE (PE): UNOERORAIN4” FT

POLYViNYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC)SEWER, 4” FT

8” FT

WATER, 6” FT

8” FT

12” - FT

DUCTILE-IRON PIPE (DIP)6” FT

8” FT

12” FT

FT

----- -

1½” FT

( ‘wer, Water mid I)raiii Pipe For June 2021prices reflect quotes from single sources and can be volatile. They are not meant to be the prevailing pice fhr a city. Data are a mix

of list and transaction prices and may include ENR estimates. Do not compare prices between locations. Use city information to analyzenational trends.

UT,Ii ATLANTA - ERL000RE BIRMINGHAM BOSTON CHICAGO CINCINNATI CLEVELEND DALLAS DENVER DETROIT

18.40- 17.50 +17.05 19.56 18.41 18.30 18.30 +17.88 18.58 18.30

-

- 37.55- 35.00 - ÷34.00 43.22 40.90 42.90 42.90 - —41.25 - 41.63 42.90

74.15 70.00 ÷69.98 91.69 83.02 96.85 96.85 L-_77.56- 81.77 96.85

12639 11500 ÷11462 15008 13436 15765 15765 —13731 14095 15765

—10.90 11.00 11.10 11.91 12.17 10.99 10.67 +14.40 +12.49 9.9933.98 34.00 33.76 36.85 42.96 31.00 35.60 +36.12 +39.80 37.99

— 76.12 74.00 75.08 79.43 88.60 62.00 66.98 h”-’_81,79- +81.32 85.55

0.73 +0.80 0.61 0.92 +0.76 ÷0.44 +0.47 0.82 0.89 - +0.45

1.56 +1.40 1.43 1.76 +1.69 +1.36 +1.42 1.68 , 1.63 +1.28

- +4.90— - -

6.95 +02 5.92 6.29 ±6 +5.98 +497 5.83 6.37 ±5811.89 9.20 9.25 10.15 +9.88 10.00 6.21 10.42 10.05 11.001990 1800 1686 1937 +19 15 1700 935 2212 1896 2266

1917 2100 1535 -2302 2251 2400 1620 2139 _[_1882 167231.92 29.00 22.84 —37.58 33.91 35.00 24.22 32.80 29.22 22.8457.53 50.00 39.00 —54.31 53.46 50.00 37.35 48.12 44.69 36.98

+1.78 +1.92 +1.75 2.00 1.73 +1.82 +1.88 2.07 —1.86 +1.90— ÷722 - +8.42 +6.99 6.89 +6.78 +8.50 +8.56 6.65 - +6.59 +8.60

KANSAS CITY LOS ANGELES MINNEAPOLIS NEW ORLEANS NEW YORK PHILADELPHIA PITTSBURGH ST. LOUIS SAT FRANCISCO SEATTLE

YER WATER TUBING: TYPE L

uNrr

REINF0RCEJ-CONCRETE PIPE (RCP)12’ FT 16.26 31.00 17.30 18.99 ÷19.45 25.20 14.00 16.95 15.70 18.9624’ FT 29.60 27.50 30.80 37.08 +40.67 41.77 26.00 2328 37.30 36.1836’ FT 58.98 54.00 50.60 77.20 +78.93 79.31 55.00 45.24 78.40 78.0548’ FT 100.00 84.OQj-_ 93.00 130.34 +140.00 139.45 90.00 82.80 122.00 132.75

CORRUGATED-STEEL PIPE (CSP) I12’ FT 11.99 ÷14.68 10.36 J_,,,, 11.18 12.23 11.59 10.15 889 +19.00 +12.1836’ FT 39.99 +52.21 35.10 L 35.82 36.59 37.26 32.00 35.99 ÷68.40 ÷38.9760” FT 72.72 ÷128.88 92.18 77.50 81.64 —76.40 71.00 58.08 +164.43 ÷80.73

POLYETHYLENE PIPE (PE): UNDERDRAIN4” Fr +0.43 1.42 +0.50 —0.78 0.83 0.90 +0.69 +0.48 1.20 0.87

P0LYVlNYLCHLORIDE PIPE (PVC)

SEWER 4 FT +1 45 2 61 +1 21_J-,— +1 65 1 64 1 95 +1 52 +1 49 ÷5 81 1 518” FT +4.92 6.94 ÷4.94 +5.49 5.89 6.22 +4.86 +4.96 +1 4.65 - ‘5.39WATER 6 FT +622 6 13 685 .1... +630 602 661 +590 +534 +1005 6658 FT 1072 806 1232 _j,, +1002 986 1002 875 860 +1465 99112 FT 1210 1527 1925 I +2055 1903 1935 1750 1405 —2387 2180

DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP)6” FT 14.22 +17.47 13.52 17.87 20.10 —19.92 18.50 16.50 ,4_ 20.51 19.338” FT 17.24 +23.01 22.88 26.05 34.68 —32.80 30.00 22.76 - 27.12 28.9512” FT 31.85 +35.25 381 44.96 52.35 - —45.00 1.00 - 37.89 45.63 43.52 -- -

“ER WATER TUBING: TYPE L

- -

_____

-____

- -- +1.7 -- - 1.-

1½” FT +8.62 7.69 8.41 7.02 6.67 6.90 +8.85 +8.64 6.59 +7.25• OR — DEITIES PRICE PITS 6.5511 CR PSiLEN TIlTS EVE/lotS REPORT OLOCESAVE SELTEVED PR.CES SCV’E “PICES MAY SCLLOE TAXES OR DISCOlOrS PRODIGY SPEGYCAYCli MAY VARY DEPENOTIS DR WHET IS MOST GTMMSNIY USED OR MOSTACCDSSMCl 1; Cml CCAVCl’CEIARE SDNER.IIYTAUC.KLOAOS .9TH PIPE -S VSTM C76 12 SOlID 2-I MAVERL’BBER-GRSGETJONTED. C-LEERS AYE IC-6-CIIRIATEG CORRUGATES STEELPIPE IS PVC a”LmCIZED; 12 IN. ISA SAUTE 36 IRIS 4 GEESE. OS It IS TV GALES PT PIPES 51252. PEHFOGFTO TIE VARREGALED P/G 55./ER PIPES ESTE’ D-3034.SDR.35. “CC WATER PIPE IS CR00. CL 50 DIP PIPE IS CL 150’AITIIAN.,SH-C’, IWT C-JPPE.R WATER T1IESGYPE IS I/TOSSED ClOT/OR DIAMETER PIPE

78

Queen Anne’s Soif Con servation District

DISTRICT OFFICE DISTRICT SHOP211 E. Water Street 3002 Church Hill RoadCentreville, MD 21617 Centreville. MD 21617410-758-3136 410-7581694

TO: County CommissionersCounty Administrator — Todd Mohn

FROM: Donna K. Landis-Smith 0Soil Conservation Aide

DATE: June 14, 2021

RE: Rural Legacy — Agreement of Sale and Project AgreementSamuel and Carolyn Beachy

94.66-acre property owned by Samuel and Carolyn Beachy is ready to be submitted to theMaryland Department of Natural Resours for review and final approval. Submission of thecomplete package includes the Agreemei of Sale and Project Agreement signed by the CoutyCommissioners.

Total funding is being provided by the Rural Legacy grants program through Program OpenSpace, no County funds are being utilized.

The Beachy property is located within the Lands End Rural Legacy Area and will add to the4,551 acres that are preserved.

MOTION: I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE RURAL LEGACY AGREEMENTOF SALE AND PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMUEL AND CAROLYNBEACHY PROPERTY.

5 010 ‘d efvce a tecpd fl a OcCrmdy, oas Strot qad to COlOr og n r x qe o or haiccao

CO SERAYCJ DEELOPE SEH CDR

79

AGREEMENT OF SALE

THIS AGREEMENT OF SALE (Agreement), dated as of the

______

day of

_________

2021 is made by and between Samuel and Carolyn Beachy “Seller” and STATE OFMARYLAND FOR THE USE OF DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES and QUEENANNE’S COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (‘Buyer”), which joins in this Agreement for thepurpose of agreeing to subordinate its mortgage to the Rural Legacy Program ConservationEasement.

1. The Seller is the owner of that property (“Property”) located in Queen Anne’s County,Maryland; Samuel and Carolyn Beachy own approximately 94.66 acres.

2. The Buyer desires to purchase conservation easements from the Seller over and acrossthe properties of Seller on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

3. The Seller is willing to grant to Buyer and/or its assigns for the hereinafter set price, aconservation easement in perpetuity, on, over, and across the property of the Seller.

NOW1 THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiencyof which are acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows:

SECTION 1. PURCHASE AND SALE.

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Seller hereby agrees tosell to Buyer and Buyer hereby agrees to purchase from Seller conservation easements on, overand across the following described properties (the “Property”): Attached is Exhibit A for theProperty.

SECTION 2. PURCHASE PRICE AND PAYMENT.

2.1. The purchase price (Purchase Price) to be paid for the Rural Legacy ProgramEasement (as defined below) shall be Four Hundred Twenty-One Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Three (S42 1,943.00) for the Samuel and Carolyn Beachy Property.

2.2. At Closing (as defined below), the entire Purchase Price shall be payable byBuyer to Seller by title company checks or by a check from a State agency of local governmentagency or qualified land trust.

2.3. The payment of the Purchase Price for the Deed of Conservation Easement iscomplete payment for the status and quality of the title to the Property required to be conveyedunder this Agreement.

SECTION 3. CLOSING.

The consummation of the transactions contemplated in this Agreement (“Closing”) shalltake place on or before August 30, 2021 at a date, time and at a place as agreed by the partieshereto, unless extended in writing for an additional six months by the parties hereto in order toobtain the approvals required by the Rural Legacy Board and Board of Public Works.

1

80

SECTION 4. CONVEYANCE OF TIlE EASEMENT.

4.1. At Closing, Seller shall convey to Buyer, and/or its assigns the Deed ofConservation Easement (“Easement”) to the Property containing covenants of special warrantyand further assurances in the same form and containing those restrictions and conditions set forthin the Easements attached hereto as Exhibit B, and made a part hereof. Title shall be good andmarketable and free and clear of any and all encumbrances, exceptions, limitations, leases andliens whatsoever, except that any mortgages shall be subordinate to the Deed of Easement atClosing if they are to remain as a lien. Title to the Property shall be insurable at regular rates byBuyers title insurance company without any exception for mechanic’s liens or rights of personsin possession. In the event a Mortgagee fails to execute a required subordination at or prior toClosing to the satisfaction of the Buyer, the Buyer at its sole option, may terminate thisAgreement and the parties shall have no further obligation to each other.

4.2. Seller shall not mortgage, lease, encumber or otherwise dispose of the Property,or any part thereof prior to Closing or the termination of this Agreement without first havingobtained the prior written consent of the Buyer.

SECTION 5. CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY AND RISK OF LOSS.

5.1. If prior to or through Closing, all or a substantial part of the Property is destroyedor damaged, without fault of the Buyer, then this Agreement, at the option of the Buyer, uponwritten notice to Seller, shall be null and void and of no further effect and the parties shall haveno further obligation to each other, in which event the Deposit and any interest accrued thereonshall be returned to the Buyer.

5.2. Seller covenants that at Closing, the Property shall be in the following condition:

i) No major alterations or construction that would be inconsistent with the terms of theEasement will be made to the Property from and after the effective date of this Agreement.

5.3. From and after the effective date of this Agreement, the Seller grants permissionto the Buyer and its contractors and subcontractors to enter upon the Property for the purpose ofmaking tests, surveys and inspections of the Property and the improvements thereon. Withoutlimiting the generality of the foregoing, Buyer shall have the right to inspect the Property, one ormore times prior to Closing, for the purpose of determining whether the Property is in thecondition, status and quality required under this Agreement.

5.4. The Seller is responsible for the removal of dumps of materials including but notlimited to soil, rock, other earth materials, trash, ashes garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles,appliances, machinery or other material on the Property to the satisfaction of the Buyer. Soil,rock, other earth materials and vegetative matter may remain stored on the Property forreasonable agriculture and silviculture purposes or for construction or maintenance of structuresor means of access ongoing at the time of this Agreement and permitted under the Easement, asdetermined by the Buyer.

2

81

SECTION 6. CLOSING COSTS.

6.1. Buyer shall pay the following costs associated with the consummation of thetransaction contemplated in this Agreement:

i) any state or county recordation and transfer taxes or fees or other costs imposed uponthe recordation of the Easement.

ii) all expenses for examination of title and the premium for any title insurance obtainedby it.

6.2. Seller shall pay the following costs associated with the consummation of thetransaction contemplated in this Agreement:

i) all taxes and fees relating to the recordation of any release of a mortgage, deed of trust,or other lien or encumbrance affecting the Property which is to be released or dischargedat Closing.

ii) any attorneys fees incurred by the Seller, and

iii) all real estate taxes and personal property taxes owing for the then cunent year leviedor assessed with respect to the Property. All taxes and other assessments against saidproperty shall be in and remain the exclusive responsibility of the Seller, including butnot limited to the payment of real estate taxes.

SECTION 7. SELLER’S REPRESENTATIONS.

7.1. Seller makes the following representations and warranties as of the dates onwhich each of them respectively executes this Agreement and as of Closing.

7.2. Seller represents and warrants that:

i) no hazardous material of any kind, nor storage tanks have been deposited, stored,treated, disposed of, managed, generated, manufactured, produced, released, emitted ordischarged on, onto, in, into, from or under the Property by the Seller, their agents,employees, officers, invitees, contractors, subcontractors, and any person in possession oruse of the Property under them, and to the best of their knowledge, information andbelief, any other person, which could expose a landowner to liability under federal law,

ii) neither Seller nor any of their agents, employees, officers, invitees, contractors,subcontractors, and any person in possession or use of the Property under them, and tothe best of their knowledge, information and belief, any other person, have brought to theProperty as materials or waste materials, or used on the Property or generated therein asa product or by-product of activities on the Property, or otherwise placed, handled, storedor released on the Property any (1) polychiorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”), (2) asbestos, (3)lead paint, (4) petroleum products, distillates, or by-products, (5) radioactive materials,chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity, (6) waste, materials, orsubstances which would qualify as hazardous waste, hazardous substances, hazardousmaterials, toxic waste, toxic materials or toxic substances under any “EnvironmentalLaws”, which shall mean under the following: the Resource Conservation and RecoveryAct, the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act, the

3

82

Toxic Substance Control Act, the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, theOccupational Safety and Health Act, the Consumer Product Safety Act, the FederalWater Pollution Control Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the NationalEnvironmental Policy, or any amendments thereto, or any similar or successor laws,whether federal state or local, or any regulations adopted or incorporated thereunder(Hereinafter referred to collectively as “Environmental Laws”),

Hi) as of Closing, the status and condition of the Property oi any portion thereof,including by way of example, the soil, paint or tiles, although then not in violation of theEnvironmental Laws is such that disturbance, removal or relocation thereof shall notcreate or result in a condition or status which is, or with the passage of time may become,unlawful under the Environmental Laws,

iv) no governmental or private action, suit or proceeding to enforce or impose liabilityunder any Environmental Laws has been instituted or threatened concerning the Propertyand no lien has been created under any applicable Environmental Laws,

v) Seller has no notice or knowledge of conditions or circumstances at the Property whichpose a risk to the environment or to the health and safety of persons,

vi) no work shall ha\ e been done or materials provided for or about any of the Propertywithin one hundred eighty (180) days ending Ofl the day of the Closing or which theperson performing the work or providing the materials has not acknowledged in writingthat is has been paid in full at or before Closing.

7.3. The Seller’s representations and warranties set forth above shall not merge with orinto the Easements and shall survive delivery of the Easement at Closing.

SECTION 8. OBLIGATIONS OF SELLER AT CLOSING.

8.1. At Closing, Seller shall execute and deliver the Easements to the Buyer.

8.2. At Closing, Seller shall execute and deliver to the Buyer’s title insurancecompany or Buyer such affidavits and writings reasonably requested from a seller in connectionwith the settlement of like property.

SECTION 9. OBLIGATIONS OF BUYER AT CLOSING.

At Closing, Buyer shall deliver the Purchase Price in accordance with the terms andconditions of this Agreement.

SECTION 10. DEFAULT.

10.1. In the event that Seller cannot convey to Buyer title to the Property as requiredunder this Agreement, Buyer shall:

i) permit Seller to take any action necessary to perfect its title and remove any and alllegal, equitable and beneficial grounds of objection to or defect of the title, at Seller’ssole cost and expense, and

ii) extend Closing until such action is completed, but not longer than one hundred twenty(120) days from the Seller’s receipt of notice from Buyer of such defect or defects to thetitle.

4

83

D In the event that Seller fails to cure the defect or defects to title within that one hundred twenty(120) day period, then and only then shall Seller be in default of its obligations to convey title tothe Property under this Agreement.

10.2. Subject to Section 10.1, in the event that Seller defaults in any of the terms,provisions, covenants or agreements to be performed by the Seller under this Agreement. Buyershall be entitled, after such default, to:

i) waive any failure to perform in writing.

ii) terminate this Agreement, in which event the parties hereto shall thereafter be relievedof any and all further rights, liabilities and obligation under or pertaining to thisAgreement, other than those which by the express terms of this Agreement are intendedto sun ive termination, in which event the Deposit and any interest accrued thereon shallbe returned to the Buyer or

0

5

84

Q iii) exercise any and all rights and seek any and all remedies which Buyer may haveor to which Buyer may be entitled at law or in equity, including, without limitation,seeking damages or specific performance.

10.3. In the event Buyer defaults in any of the terms, provisions, covenants oragreement to be perfonned by Buyer under this Agreement, Seller shall be entitled, aftersuch default, to:

i) waive any failure of performance in writing,

ii) terminate this Agreement in entirety, in which event the parties hereto shallthereafter be relieved of any and all further rights, liabilities and obligations, otherthan those, which by the express terms of this Agreement are intended to survivesuch termination, or

iii) institute such actions or proceedings for monetary damages and/or equitablerelief as are authorized by applicable law.

SECTION 11. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

11.1. This Agreement is the full agreement among the parties on the matters set* forth herein. This Agreement can only be amended by written amendment executed by the

parties hereto.

11.2 The parties hereto further agree that this Agreement is expressly contingentupon the approval by the Maryland Rural Legacy Board and the Maryland State Board ofPublic Works. In the event either the Maryland Rural Legacy Board or the Board of PublicWorks fails to approve this Agreement, the Buyer, at its sole option, may terminate thisAgreement by written notice to Seller, and the parties shall have no further obligation toeach other.

6

85

0

BUYER

7

(Seal)Queen Anne’s County Commissioners

86

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be dulyexecuted and delivered, the day and year first written above.

Witness/Attest:

JI(

/dooJc

SELLER

‘J (Seal)/arnuel Beachy

1

Maryland Department of Natut al ResourcesRuial Legacy Progiam

Proj ect Agreement

1. RURAL LEGACY AREA: Lands End

2. TYPE OF ACQUISITION: EASEMENTX

___

FEE SIMPLE________

3. OWNER OF PROPERTY TO BE ACQURIED: Samuel and Carolyn BeachyOwned since: 2001

4. NUMBER OF PROPERTY ON GRANT AGREEMENT LIST OF ELIGIBLEPROPERTIES: One

5. ACRES TO BE ACQUIRED: 94.66

6. AMOUNT REQUESTED $421,943.00 Total RLP Funding Requested(Sponsor may request an advance payment of all or a portion of administrative, incidental, direct: or programcompliance costs itemized in this Project Agreement, subject to the approval of the Rural Legacy Board).

7. LAND VALUES:Direct Cost: SDirect cost determined by: (check one)

A. X Approved EVS (Worksheet attached)

Easement Acquisition Cost S42 1,943 ($4,466.00! acre)

CREP Buffer (If applicable) S______________________ (S

__________________/acre)

Total Direct Cost:$42 1,943 ($4,466.00/acre)

B.

___________Appraisals*

(Appraisals Enclosed)

1. Appraised Land:

Land Value A: S (S____________________ /acre)

Appratser A

______________________________________/_________________________

(Date of Valuation)Land Value B S (S /acre)

Appraiser B:/________________________

(Date of Valuation)*Appraiser from the DGS approved list or Appraiser that has been approved for POS local sideacquisitions.

87

C))2. Appraisal Evaluation:

a. Spread between appraisalsexplain):__________

_____%.

(If the spread is greater than 20% please

b. Average of appraisals $_____________

equal to the average of the appraisals? Yes• Is the cost for land and improvements

____

No

____,

(If no, please explain):

C. Appraisals are: compatible , high , low for the area. (if high or lowplease explain):

Are appraisals more than 12 months old? Yes No (if yes, explain):

e. Costs of improvements: Sfee simple acquisition)

(Total costs of improvements for

C. Comments regarding EVS or appraisal values, if any:

7

88

ItemAttorney costs

___________

Survey

__________

Title Policy

9. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS SO (not to exceed 3% of Direct Cost)

10. PROGRAM COMPLIANCE COSTS (Donated and Purchased Easements Only)(not to exceed 1.5% of Direct Cost)

SO Explain how the funds will be used.)

(Sponsor shall execute a Program Compliance Cost Agreement prepared by the Rural Legacy Board prior toreceipt of any Rural Legacy Program funds for program compliance costs)

11. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE ACQUIRED:

8. INCIDENTAL COSTS:Itemize below all Incidental Costs: Appraisals, Title work, Surveys, soil & water or forest stewardship plans, etc.

CostS 1,737.0086.47500Si .945.29

, SSSi 0. 157.29 Total Incidental Costs

Project Description: The Beachy propcy has many environmental qualities, non-tidalwetlands. poion of the propety lies within the critical area, has a blue line stream and avery large water body, well established CREP. Preserving this propeiy will maintain ascenic viewshed for the many adjacent residential oronerties.

a. Project Location/Street Address: 200 Hillside Rd.City, State Zip: Chestertown. MD 21620

_______

Co. QA Tax Map #: 9 Grid: 12 Parcel #: 58 Tax Acct. #18-02-011719

b. Municipalities within 1 mile: none

c. List all current improvements; identify size, condition, current use, and future useof each improvement if known.House — 1.440 sq. ft.. beehive shed lOX 12, Chicken house 25X40. Mobile home14X72. Machinery Shed 40X100

3

89

d. Describe what the property is currently used for (forestry, agriculture, pasture,

Q hay, etc.). If used for agriculture, please list what crops are harvested (i.e.corn/soy beans/wheat) agriculture — grain, wheat, corn and soybeans rotation,hunting, honey production

e. Current land use (add up to total of property):

Developed: Q_ac Pasture: Oac Row Crops: 44.9 ac

Hay/Grass: Oac Forest: ac Wetland: 7ac

f. How many acres are:

Flood Plain 1.5 ac. In the Critical Area 17.3 ac. CREP 4.4 ac

g. Identify watershed property is located in: Rosin’s Creek

h. Identify any waterways (streams, creeks, rivers, etc.) located on or adjacent to thisproject? Blue line stream located on property, tidal waters on adjacent property

Please name the path this watei takes to get to Chesapeake Bay (or whatever thelarge waterway in the area is) and names of whatever waterways you know:The blue line stream runs north west to the Chester River then south west to theChesapeake Bay

i. Current riparian corridor condition (linear feet):

Interior Stream (2-sided corridor)? Forested 100 ± ft Grassed 0 ft

Acti e Farmland/Othei — ft

Tidal Shoreline and Boundary Stream (1-sided corridor)? Forested 100 ft

Grassed

_______ft

Active Fannland/Other________ ft

j. Subdivided? If yes, # of lots 0, Average size of lots

_________

k. Zoning Code: CS Explain Zoning 1:8 with the 2012 Sustainable Growth andPreser\ ation Act would only penmt seven lots

1. Number of residential lots extinguished/retained by this easement/ fee simpleacquisitions: extinguished: 5 retained: 2

04

90

rn. Does this acquisition follow the approved density policy for the Rural Legacy

j Area? Yes: x No:

_______

If not, please explain and attach RLP approval for pioceeding with this project

n. Is there a current Water Quality Plan implemented on the property? No

o. Are any Best Management Practices anticipated on the property? No

______

If yes, which of the following:Forest Buffer Plantings

________acres

Grass Buffer Plantings

_______acres

Other Reforestation

________acres

Other?(please list)

____________

acres

p. Highest & Best Use: to remain in agricultural use as currently being used

q. Utilities available: Water Sewer

r. Environmental Hazards: No X, Yes

______

If there are any hazards listthem and identify how they will be addressed (Environmental AssessmentAttached)

012. BENEFITS DERIVED FROM THIS ACQUISITION:

The subject property is located in the critical area and has a large pond on the propertywhich will provide a scenic viewshed for the adjacent development and property ownersto enjoy. The property has non-tidal wetlands, a blue line stream and hydric soils.Development pressure for the demand of waterfront and water view lots remains high,preserving this property would benefit the local residents. The owner utilizes,conservation tillage, cover crop, has a current NMP and SCWP.

13. POTENTIAL CONFLICTS:

Describe how you will address any potential conflicting uses or any possible “noncompatible” uses being planned adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the propertywhich might require a possible future change in use from that use described in thisProject Agreement Such a change would constitute a Land Use Conversion and wouldrequire various approvals per the Rural Legacy Manual. (i.e. road widening, etc.)

None foreseen

___________________________________________________________________

91

14. DEGREE OF THREAT:

Describe the degree of threat of the Rural Legacy Area in general then for this specificproperty. For example: (1) for the area, tell about the general pressure of developmentand where it comes from; (2) has there been any offers/interest shown by developers onthe specific property or nearby properties; and (3) has there been any preliminarysubdivision plats done for the property or well/septic tests?There is a continued threat of development for the Baltimore Washington DCmetropolitan commutable area especially water accessible areas.

_______

16. IF EASEMENT, MORTGAGE AND LIEN(S) WILL BE:Satisfied

______________

Subordinated

17. DISPOSAL OF FEE SIMPLE PROPERTY (if applicable):

a) If Sponsor has a plan for the disposal of fee simple property, describe:

b) Describe the allocation of the proceeds from such sale of fee simple propertybetween the Sponsor, Title Holders and the Rural Legacy Board:

18. SPONSOR CONTACT:

Donna K. Landis-SmilPrint Name

Telephone #443-988-4178 Fax #410-758-3820

Street address: 211 E Water Street

City: Centreville State: MD

19. SPECIAL CONDITIONS TO PROJECT AGREEMENT: (Describe, if any)

6

a)

15. EASEMENT/ FEE TITLE PROPOSED FOR ACQUISITION WILL BE HELDBY:

Name of Title Holder (Title Holder per Section 4.2.3. of Grant Agreement) Type of real property interest

If fee title held by Land Trust, Required Overlay Easement will be held by:

Name of Title Holder (Title Holder per Section 4.2.3. of Grant Agreement) Type of real property interest

/

Zip Code 21617

92

20. WILL PAY’IENTS BE MADE TO LANDOWNER IN INSTALLMENTS OVERTIME THEREBY REQUIRING INVESTMENT OF RLP FUNDS? No

22 LOCAL GOVERNMENT/SPONSOR AUTHORIZATION

As the authorized representative of Queen Anne’s, I have read the terms of the ProjectAgreement and the Local Government Sponsor/Title Holder agrees to perform the ProjectAgreement in accordance with its terms and those of the Grant Agreement dated

___________________

and in accordance with the Rural Legacy Program law, regulations,and Manual.

By Todd Mohn County Administrator(Signature) (Print Name) (Print Title) (Date)

ATTEST:(Signature) (Print Name) (Print Title) (Date)

DATE:

7

93

MARYLANDAocfutiw D

COUNTIES

June 1, 2021

The Honorable Chris CorchiarinoCommissioner President ---

Queen Anne’s County 21 Fi:

107 North Liberty Street -


Dear Commissioner President Corchiarino:

Enclosed is an invoice for the dues and assessmentfor Fiscal Year 2022 as approved at the

virtual Winter Conference Business Meeting held on December 18, 2020. The budget was

approved with a continuation of a dues freeze from FY 2010, so the dues amount for your

jurisdiction remains the same as the last 12 years. The Associ2tion’s By-Laws provide that unpaid

dues and assessments become delinquent after July 31, 2021.

Your participation and support have built a strong and vibrant organization that achieves many

legislative victories for county governments. I wanted to take this opportunity to thank you, on

behalf of MACo’s Officers and Directors, for the support you and your colleagues have provided

the Association and I’d like to share some of MACo’s successes over the past year.

The 2021 Legislative Session was one of the most consequential sessions in memory — as

lawmakers moved to address the many challenges brought on and exacerbated by the pandemic.

The unique circumstances surrounding the 442nd legislative session, including necessary health

and safety measures, posed a challenge for lawmakers and advocates alike. Legislative buildings

were closed to the public in observance of precautionary measures, ultimately resulting in

hundreds of bills being passed without direct face-to-face stakeholder input. Despite these

challenges, MACo’s advocacy remained strong and effective.

Building on long-standing, strong relationships with legislators, MACo was effective in fending

off legislation that was adverse to counties and successful in supporting bills that were favorable

to county interests. MACo also helped improve many pieces of legislation through articulating

county positions in amendments and will continue to work with State partners in several areas of

ongoing administrative improvement.

Providing necessary and meaningful relief for Maryland residents and businesses struggling

amidst the pandemic proved to be one of the biggest issues of the Session. The General Assembly

ultimately approved Governor Hogan’s RELIEF Act, which provides direct payments to eligible

Maryland residents, exempts unemployment benefits from taxation, and grants significant

benefits to businesses. While the bill does have both a state and local fiscal impact, the costs are

169 Conduit Street, Annapolis, MD 21401

410.2690043 B.LT/AN\p • 301.261.1140 WASH DC .410.263.1775 FAx

www.mdcounties.org

94

, largely mitigated by an mflux of direct federal relief payments to states and local governments

The pandemic has also laid bare the urgent need to close Maryland’s persistent ‘digital divide”by directing meaningful resources to enhance incentives and orchestrate opportunities forbroadband deployment across the state. MACo successfully advocated for the passage of ourLegislative Initiative to establish a first-of-its-kind “dig once” policy to encourage imdergroundfiber deployment in conjunction with road construction projects. This innovative bill, in additionto legislation to retool Maryland’s statewide strategy for broadband deployment and the State’scommitment to invest $300 million to bring high-speed internet to unserved areas, putsMaryland in a strong position to accelerate broadband deployment across the state.

MACo also led the effort to secure meaningful support for our state’s front lines of public healthand prevention efforts — the local health departments. In addition, counties successfullysupported legislation to establish an assistance program for homeowners facing tax sales, led asuccessful effort to restore veto-driven cuts to the Disparity Grant program, and ensured thatMaryland will continue its ambitious and important move toward Next Generation 9-1-1. Severalbills were improved and passed with MACo amendments that relieved the strain on localresources. And overall, counties were saved from costly mandates and preemptive regulations asa direct result of MACo’s efforts and advocacy.

Policy issues will remain a particularly hot topic this interim, and MACo will continue to investin legislative outreach during the year to connect with members of the General Assembly atcritical points during the interim leading into the 2022 Legislative Session. MACo hopes youcontinue to find our legislative tracking database helpful when accessing legislative information,testimony, and committee reports.

In addition to its normal interim work, MACo continues to respond to immediate and pressingcounty COVID-19 needs. MACo has created and maintains a COVID-19 County Resource pageon our website. We have also increased the frequency of communication with the thirteen countyaffiliate organizations representing professional county government staff, providing them with aplatform to share best practices and lessons learned with colleagues.

On the state level, MACo has been working with the Governor’s administration and agencies onCOVID-19 response and resources. And on the federal level, MACo continues to work closelywith the National Association of Counties (NACo) to assist counties in navigating the ins andouts of the latest round of federal pandemic relief—which includes meaningful and directfunding for every county in Maryland. To that end, MACo hosted a very successful andwell-attended virtual forum with U.S. Senator Ben Cardin to discuss the recentlypassed American Rescue Plan and its impact on local governments

MACo’s spotlight event of the year — the Summer Conference — remains a stand-out eventupheld by NACo, other states’ county associations, and thousands of participants as the leadingevent of its kind. The conference provides invaluable educational and parthership opportunities ()for everyone involved in county services in Maryland. After considering the latest health metricsand guidance, the Board of Directors announced their decision to move forward with an in

95

person Summer Conference in Ocean City, Maryland for 2021. Safety protocols will be in placethroughout the conference to ensure a healthy and productive event.

At this conference, MACo and county leaders will explore the local role in pandemic responsearid recovery — strategic planning, evolving service delivery, emergency communications,advancing technologies, and fiscal obstacles — all of which constitute the fabric of localleadership.

MACo’s website highlights advocacy, conference, and county programs offered by MACo,enhancing information access. We continue to expand the use of the MACo news blog, ConduitStreet, and our use of social media. Our Conduit Street podcast has continued to grow inpopularity, reaching more than 1,500 listeners per episode. The podcast provides insight andupdates on issues of county interest from MACo’s Policy Team with guest introductions from

state and local elected leaders across the state, including the Governor.

MACo’s various communications outlets serve to keep you better informed on policy issues,professional development opportunities, and happenings in county government. We also gainimportant gro nd in advocacy and relationship-building through these efforts as they raise

MACo’s profile as a source of political and policy analysis in Annapolis.

Our Corporate Partner Program now includes 25 companies and we have pursued additionalsponsorships of other events held throughout the year. Our growing Endorsement PartherProgram adds institutional value while also directly increasing efficiency and county servicedelivery. These actions have enabled us to keep dues flat for the past 11 years, in recognition of

the difficulties facing each county’s budget. We will continue to seek cost-saving measures, toensure MACo members always receive excellent value for their supporting contributions.

As Executive Director, I am pleased to share these successes with you — especially during theseuncertain and challenging times. With your continued support and guidance, I look forward tomany more advances for our Association. If you have any questions about the attached duesinvoice or budget, please do not hesitate to contact me or MACos Administration and FinanceDirector, Leslie Velasco ([email protected]).

Yours truly,

Michael SandersonExecutive Director

Attachments: Invoice - FY 2022 Dues and AssessmentsApproved Budget - FY 2022

96

Maryland Association of Counties169 Conduit StreetAnnapolis, Maryland 214019-(410) 269-0043 W-(301) 261-1140

InvoiceDATE INVOICE NO.

6/1/2021 2617

DESCRIPTION

FY 2022 Dues & AssessmentsDues contributions allow MACo to provide services thatinclude legislative advocacy, state budget defense, trainingand educational programs, policy analysis, Conduit Street

and newsletter, cost-saving opportunities, and otherrams and services to Queen Anne’s County and its

residents.

BILL TO

Queen Anne’s County107 North Liberty StreetCentreville, MD 21617

RATE

15,113.00

AMOUNT

15,113.00

c, FID #52-6047837 Please remit payment to:MACo, 169 Conduit Street,Annapolis, MD 21401 Total $15,113.00

97

FISCAL YEAR 2022 DL AND ASSESSMENTS

ESTIMATED 1VARIABLE 2DUES& TOTAL TOTAL 3TOTALDUE ESTIMATED 1VARIABLE 2DUES& TOTAL TOTAL 3TOTALDUEPOPULATION RATE FIXED FY2021 OFFSET WITH OFFSET POPULATION RATE FIXED FY2021 OFFSET WITH OFFSET

LOCAL UNIT 7/1/2020 0.0708355 CHARGES FY2021 7/1/2021 0.0716902 CHARGES FY2022

TOTAL STATE 6,141,900 435,065 531,746 $966,810 401,536 $565,274 6,068,673 435,065 531,746 $966,810 401,536 $565,274

Allegany 74,150 5,252 22,156 27,409 11,197 16,212 69,380 4,974 22,156 27,130 10,918 16,212Anne Arundel 573,250 40,606 22,156 62,763 26,624 36,139 586,916 42,076 22,156 64,232 28,093 36,139BaltimoreCity 616,300 43,656 22,156 65,812 24,457 41,355 576,709 41,344 22,156 63,500 22,145 41,355Baltimore 847,000 59,998 22,156 82,154 33,573 48,581 826,392 59,244 22,156 81,400 32,819 48,581

Calvert 94,600 6,701 22,156 28,857 11,871 16,987 93,482 6,702 22,156 28,858 11,871 16,987Caroline 34,050 2,412 22,156 24,568 10,073 14,495 33,658 2,413 22,156 24,569 10,074 14,495Carroll 169,200 11,985 22,156 34,141 13,492 20,650 168,977 12,114 22,156 34,270 13,620 20,650Cecil 104,600 7,409 22,156 29,565 12,020 17,545 103,241 7,401 22,156 29,557 12,012 17,545

Charles 167,050 11,833 22,156 33,989 14,597 19,392 167,011 11,973 22,156 34,129 14,737 19,392Dorchester 34,300 2,430 22,156 24,586 10,163 14,423 31,819 2,281 22,156 24,437 10,014 14,423Frederick 260,800 18,474 22,156 40,630 17,320 23,310 268,818 19,272 22,156 41,428 18,117 23,310Garrett 30,300 2,146 22,156 24,302 10,018 14,284 28,781 2,063 22,156 24,219 9,935 14,284

Harford 257,700 18,254 22,156 40,410 16,591 23,820 258,695 18,546 22,156 40,702 16,882 23,820Howard 336,900 23,864 22,156 46,021 20,481 25,539 332,129 23,810 22,156 45,966 20,427 25,539Kent 20,900 1,480 22,156 23,637 9,770 13,867 19,367 1,388 22,156 23,544 9,678 13,867Montgomery 1,052,050 74,522 22,156 96,679 41,386 55,292 1,055,885 75,697 22,156 97,853 42,560 55,292

Prince George’s 916,150 64,896 22,156 87,052 37,274 49,778 909,020 65,168 22,156 87,324 37,546 49,778Queen Anne’s 50,750 3,595 22,156 25,751 10,638 15,113 50,976 3,655 22,156 25,811 10,697 15,113St. Mary’s 120,150 8,511 22,156 30,667 13,034 17,633 114,966 8,242 22,156 30,398 12,765 17,633Somerset 26,750 1,895 22,156 24,051 9,910 14,140 25,573 1,833 22,156 23,989 9,849 14,140

Talbot 38,850 2,752 22,156 24,908 10,311 14,597 37,348 2,677 22,156 24,834 10,237 14,597Washington 156,800 11,107 22,156 33,263 13,613 19,650 151,888 10,889 22,156 33,045 13,395 19,650Wicomico 106,200 7,523 22,156 29,679 12,399 17,280 104,749 7,510 22,156 29,666 12,386 17,280Worcester 53,100 3,761 22,156 25,917 10,725 15,192 52,891 3,792 22,156 25,948 10,756 15,192

1. 45% Variable Rate = 0.0716902 based on population (Population figures from MD State Data Center, October 2020)2. Dues & Assessments = $22,156 (Dues = $100.00, Fixed Charges Based on 55% of Total Dues & Assessments)3. Dues amounts remain the same as FY 2010

Prepared by MACO 5/27/2021

MD Association of Counties

Proposed FY 2022 Budget

Approved FY Projected Proposed2021 Budget FY 2021 FY 2022

Ordinary lncomelExpenseIncome

Dues and assessments 966,810 966,810 1,015,150Offset (401,536) (401,536) (449,876)Total Dues 565,274 565,274 565,274Reserve Funding of Offset 401,536 401,536 449,876

966,810 966,810 1,015,150Summer Conference Income

Attendee income 495,414 2,040 515,231Exhibitor Income 273,900 0 284,856Tech Expo Exhibitor Income 8,000 0 8,000Golf Income 5,600 0 5,600Sponsorlncome 115,000 13,250 115,000

Total Summer Conference Income 897,914 15,290 928,687

Annual winter meetingExhibitor income 30,400 0 30,400Attendee income 184,141 0 184,141Sponsorship 41,485 5,000 45,000

Total Annual winter meeting 256,026 5,000 259,541

MAC0 Hosted Meetings 8,000 3,450 8,000Directory saleslady. 500 5,160 500Corporate Partner 296,000 236,000 280,000LGIT Inst Value Fee 164,970 164,970 169,919NACo PEG, LLC - Nationwide 187,277 255,639 261,263Investment Income 80,000 80,000 80,000Enterprise Programs 94,232 66,017 80,893Miscellaneous Revenue 1,025 800 1,025

Total Income 2,952,754 1,799,135 3,084,978

ExpenseSalaries 1,060,000 890,000 1,030,000EPA 42,400 30,000 41,200Session support 7,500 7,500 7,500Organizational support 13,600 13,600 13,600Social security 70,594 77,184 81,044Leave Buy Back 10,000 11,500 10,000Health Benefits 171,871 129,895 140,287Life insurance 3,679 3,600 3,679Retirement 114,340 98,710 111,670Disability 8,077 7,980 8,156Building maintenance 4,546 4,448 4,546Utilities/janitorial 16,031 14,733 15,058Parking/mileage 31,646 26,091 32,159Travel 28,826 12,200 37,200Presidential Initiatives 3,000 3,000 3,000Office supplies 6,958 11,068 11,311Directory publication 4,802 4,802 4,908Communications 13,244 13,472 13,768Postage 3,084 796 814Publication and dues 10,197 23,179 23,689ProfessionallAdministrative 33,937 27,493 28,097Printing/Distribution/Marketing 1,893 1,803 1,893TechnologylEquipment maintenance 33,585 29,062 29,701Enterprise Program 11,000 2,000 6,000Miscellaneous contingency 15,000 15,000 15,000Summer conference expense 484,314 20,000 523,059Winter meeting expense 248,022 5,512 263,888Director/committee mtgs 27,068 12,574 16,392MAC0 Hosted Meetings 15,530 23,424 30,546

Total Expense 2,494,745 1,520,627 2,508,165

Net Ordinary Income 458,010 278,508 576,813

5/27/202 1 8:32 PM gg

Queen Anne’s County Public Schools

(Local Unit)

ANNUAL BUDGETfor the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022

Authorized under §5-101, §5-102, and §5-111 ofEducation Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland

Refer to the Financial Reporting Manual for Ma,yland Public Schools, Revised 2014for definitions of accounts to be reported on this budget.

CERTIFICATION STATEMENTTo the Board of County Commissioners or the County/City Council:In accordance with the requirements of the Acts of the General Assembly, and the rulesand regulations of the State Board of Education, and on and with the advice of the StateSuperintendent of Schools, the Board of Education herewith submits the itemizedschool budget, showing the financial needs and estimated federal, state, local, andother revenue sources of the County/City for Current Expenses, School Construction,and Debt Service.

Agreeably, thereto you are hereby requested to provide from CountyICity sources thefollowing appropriation, rewectivelv

(1

Current Expense — Recurring Locai Appropriation $ 62,559,389Current Expense — Nonrecurring Local $ 0AppropriationTotal Local Appropriation $ 62,559,389School Construction — $6,472,000Debt Service , $6,68j11 ,-

Duly submitted by: --./ b{’e// z1’

-zThe above appropriations from County/City sources have been approved.

Signature of President or Chairof the County/City Council or County Commissioners

Preparer /Jane K. Towers, CPA

Telephone410—758—8208 ext. 158Date06 15 21

8-3

100

QUEEN ANNE’S COUNTYREQUEST FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT

FY 2021

increase Sheriff’s Office Proceeds/Insurance Claims 100

jD

110000 38760 $ 106,500

Increase in Revenues $ 106,500

Equipment 100 110000 9010 $ 106500

Increase in Expenditures $ 106,500

0

Justification:

This amendment increases budget authority for the Sheriff’s Department for repair equipment purchases which

proceeds for approximately $106,500.

tional County funds requested.

Requester printed Department: ittany Moran, Finance

Requester signature &date;

Finance Director signature & date: 1flJ0Lt 12c v ( (2. I

Approval & date:

______

amefldmer,ts/SHERIFF5 OEPPFY21 Insflr,,ce Prflceed - Iflcease n Eqpr,enI S100.000 xlsx\FY21 CC-42 5/25/2021 1116 A&1

101

# CC-42

Entered By

_________

Date

Description of expenditure/revenue accounts to iric/(dec): Fund

5/24/2021

increase

Account Code

Increase(Decrease)

Amount

Sheriff’s Office

\ \

Date 512412021

Increase Tourism - Grant Fund Misc. Expense 500 515507 8995

Increase in Expense

13425

13,425

Justification:

This amendment is to increase the Tourism Grant budget by $13425 related to an agreement between QAC, the Stevensville A&E District and

Chesapeake Charities. Chesapeake Charities received State funding on behalf of the Stevensvilte A&E District, but are not permitted to spend those

funds on their behalf. The County will spend the funds and Chesapeake Charities will provide reimbursement. The Stevensville A&E District cannot apply

for funding directly due to the way their organization is structured.

No additional County funds needed.

Requester printed Department: Brit Moran, Finance

Requester signature & date:

Finance Director signature & date: ( L,Approval & date:

______________________

3iz4Izii-k’o-kv itIcI2!

For,s’BUDG AMENDMT FY21 Steve,,IIe ASS 5 3k jYCC-.13

# CC-43

QUEEN ANNE’S COUNTY

REQUEST FOR BUDGET AMENDMENTFY 2021

Description of expenditure/revenue accounts to increase/(decrease):

Increase Tourism - Grant Fund Misc. Revenue

Account CodeFund Activity Account Project

500 515507 39090

Increase in Revenue

Increase

(Decrease)Amount

13,425

13,425

5124,202’ 5. 1 FM

1 0 2

Project OnlyFund Account Code

increase DPW Storage Building Renovation FY21 Prior Year Fund Balance

increase DPW Storage Building Renovation Buildings - Additions/Alterations

Justification:

410 412000 39941 400925

410 412000 9040 400925

S 15000.00

5 15000.00

Approval & date:

Karen Rodgers, Finance

‘ctILtifl CvtJZ’ /. 7/)Ii /2

Fn,,eBUDGAWE1lDUTpI&projem GENERAL 2)WY21 cc-IA6,2)2021 li1322)1

103

# CC-44

Description of expenditure/revenue accounts to increase/(decrease):

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY

REQUEST FOR BUDGET AMENDMENTFY2021

i’lDate 5/27/2021

Increase(Decrease)

Amount

This amendment increases the esisting budget for the OPW Storage Building Renovation project by $1 5.000. The existing budget for this project is $322,784.

Per discussion with Alan Quimby, there were two change orders for drainage and a damaged wall panel. The funding for these change orders will be funded with

prior year capital fund balance.

Requester printed Department:


Finance Director signature & date:

Increase Health Department Vehicles 100 125000 9054

Total increase in expenditures

Decrease Health Department Local Allocation 100 125000 8820

Total decrease in expenditures

Net change in expenditures

Justification:

$ 47,100

S 47,100

—- 47,100

S 47,100

S -

This amendment is to transfer $47, 100 from local allocation to the vehicle expenditure account to cover the cost of a replacement

administrative emergency response vehicle. This transfer of funds was approved by the - uniyCommissioners on May 11 2021.

No additional County funds requested.

Requester printed Department:


Finance Director signature & date:

Brittany Moran, Finance

S.

q//

(ioU 4-k3-Pv (ftfZjApproval & date:

104

# CC-45

QUEEN ANNES COUNTY

REQUEST FOR BUDGET AMENDMENTFY2021

Description of expenditure/revenue accounts to increase/(decrease): Fund

‘3Date 0/1/2021

Increase(Decrease)

Account Code Amount

Q Public NoticesMARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

WATER AND SCIENCE ADMINISTRATION1800 WASHINGTON BOULEVARDBALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230

Notice of Application for State Wetland Licenses, Private WetlandPermits, Nontidal Wetlands and Waterways Permits and/or Water

Quality Certification and the Opportunity to Provide Written Commentor Request an Informational Hearing

June 15, 2021

The Water and Science Administration has received the applications listed below. A preliminaryreview has indicated that the listed projects may be subject to the opportunity for a publichearing once the application is substantially complete. Projects may be significantly alteredduring the review process. The applications and related information are available for inspectionand copying. You may also request written notice of any hearing opportunity by having yourname placed on the interested persons list for each project in which you are interested. Toinspect the file or to have your name placed on the interested persons list, contact the assigneddivision at the telephone number indicated below or send an email to the assigned reviewer nolater than July 15, 2021, unless otherwise noted in the Public Notice.

Tidal Wetlands Division - (410) 537-3571


202061428/20-WL-0957: The Cove Creek Club Inc., at 114 North Creek Court, Stevensville,Maryland has applied to mechanically dredge; the entrance channel of the Cove Creek ClubMarina to a depth of 5.0 feet consisting of a 100-foot wide and 150-foot long area channelwardof the jetties and the 540-foot long and 25-foot wide channel between the stone jetties, resultingin a total of no more than 900 cubic yards of dredged material to be placed at a dredgedmaterial placement site owned by the Cove Creek Club Inc. located to the Southwest ofTerrapin Lane and Penny Lane. The purpose of this project is to improve navigational access.The proposed project is located within the tidal waters on the Eastern Bay at 114 North Creekcourt, Stevensville, Maryland, 21666. For more information, please contact Andrew Belfield [email protected] or at 410-537-3541.

1

Queen.,4nne ‘S

County

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING110 Vincit St., Suite 104


Telephone Planning: (410) 758-1255Fax Planning: (410) 758-2905

Telephone Permits: (410) 758-4088Fax Permits: (410) 758-3972

MEMORANDUM

Information Item

County Coin inissioners:James J. Moran, At LargeJack N. Wilson, Jr., District 1Stephen Wilson. District 2Philtp L. Ditmenil. District 3Christopher M. Corchiarino, District 4

TO: County CommissionersTodd Mohn, County Administrator

CC: Planning CommissionEconomic Development Commission

FROM: Amy G. Moredock, CFM, Director

DATE: May25,2021

SUBJECT: Monthly Department Report — April 2021

The following information is compiled by the staff of the Department of Planning and Zoning. The information providedis current as of April 30, 2021.

Planning:

Long-Range Planning/Community Planning/Text Amendments/ Environmental/Critical Area Planning:o The following citizen sponsored text amendments were favorably reviewed by the Planning Commission at

their April 8 meeting:

#21-02 - Walter H. Petrie, Bay Bridge Marina Ventures, LLC, and Timothy P. McGrath c/o Joseph A.Stevens, Esq: § 18:1-22. Urban Commercial (UC) District. Addition of major and minor multifamilyprovisions as part of a redevelopment that includes an existing Marina and amendment ofdimensional and bulk standards along with maximum building height for nonresidential uses. Theamendment was introduced by the County Commissioners on April 27 and the public hearing will beheld June 22.

• #21-03 - Nashville Properties, LLC c/o Joseph A. Stevens, Esq.: § 18:1-28 Town Center (TC) Districtand § l8App-1 Definitions. This proposed amendment would allow for self-storage facilities withininterior access only. The amendment was introduced by the County Commissioners on April 27 andthe public hearing will be held June 22.

• #21-04 - E. Trippe Callahan, Jr., c/o Ryan Showalter, Esq.: § 18:1-38.1(B) Utility Scale Solar Array(USSA) District. Allow for arrays to be located outside the district if they are partially inside of theUSSA Overlap District Map. The Planning Commission included a condition on the favorablerecommendation that the staff’s comments and concern be addressed. No updates have beensubmitted at this time.

• All three amendments were explained in detail to the Economic Development Commission at theirmonthly meeting on April 28.

2

o Comprehensive Plan:• Wallace Montgomery completed the draft Housing and Historic & Cultural Resources chapter which

was reviewed by staff and the Planning Commission on April 8 and made available online for review.• Special Topic Workshops Economic Deelopment & Touiism and To\n Planning on Apiil 1 and

KNDF/Kent NaiTows Community Plan on April 29• Technical Committee Meeting: Economic Development & Tourism on April 27• Draft Economic Development & Tourism chapter was reviewed by staff.

o Reports• Compiled data and diafting 2020 Annual Report to the Maiyland Depaitment of Planmng

Compiled data for 2020 Fee in Lieu report for the Critical Area Commission.o Critical Area

• Project Review• Hickory Ridge, SUB-21-03-0224 - revise property lines absorbing one of three lots• Kentmorr Marina Properties LLC, SUB-21-04-0225 - reconfigure lot 19 and parcel 30• Graux, Yves, SUB-20-06-0182 - conveying 0.08 ac -/+ of land from parcel 28 to parcel 27

• Scope of Work for the FY22 grant was drafted and submitted to the Critical Area Commissiono Meeting Attendance: Historic Sites Consortium, Comprehensive Plan weekly updates along with meetings

with other county staff regarding the update of the Comprehensive Plan, Critical Area Quarterly PlannerMeeting

Development Review/Site Plans/Subdivision Plats/Growth Allocations/Adequate Public Facilities:Administrative Subdivision plat reviewsAspen Institute, SUB-19-11-0153 - reconfigure property linesAllwang William SUB 2103 0215 combine 2 lots into oneJames, Robert, SUB-21-03-0216 - combining 6 lots into 3Cohbros Propeities LLC SUB 21 03 0218— subdivide into 2 lotsPrice’s Chapel, SUB-20-09-0 197 - adjust boundary linesParsley, John & April, SUB-21-03-02 19 - combine parcel 23, 27 and 34 into one parcelHickory Ridge, SUB-21-03-0224 - revise property lines absorbing one of three lotsKentmorr Marina Properties LLC, SUB-21-04-0225 - reconfigure lot 19 and parcel 30Graux,Yves, SUB-20-06-0182 - conveying 0.08 ac -/+ of land from parcel 28 to parcel 27Thompson, Kyle & Rebecca, SUB-21-04-0226 - combine lots 119, 120 & 121.Living Waters Church, SUB- 20-07-0183 - relocate the lot linesBianham Michael SUB 21 02 0214 combirnng pai.cels 134 and 126

o Major Subdivision plat reviewsHopelands, SUB-20-07-0 186 - subdivide into 2 lotsLiving Waters Church. SUB-20-02-0 160 - relocate the lot lines and subdivide into 10 lots

o Mixed Used site plan reviewsEastern Shore Exodus, SP-20-02-005 1 - create a stand-alone building with 8 apartments and 3 commercialapartments

o Minor Site plan reviewBluegrass Solar, SP-21-03-0072 - proposed electrical substationBig Truck Brewery, SP-20-07-0062 - create a brewery

o i1ajor Site plan reviewBluegrass Solar, SP-19-08-0034 - solar arrayPostal Road, SP-20-12-0070 - create two 30 unit apartment buildings

3

o Planning Commission meeting, April 8, 2021Extension Requests: No requests.

Zoning:

Concept Plan: No reviews.

Projects: No reviews.

Building Permit information (Source: Energov & Sungard):

D Permit Applications Submitted

Permits Issued

D Residiential

D Commercial

Building Permit Tracking 2021

April 2021 April 2020 202 1 Year to Date 2020 Year to Date

Permit Applications Submitted 202 202 849 369

Permits Issued 188 139 684 306Residential 131 109 471 239

Commercial 57 30 211 67

Construction Value * $3.849,1 10 * $27,002,687* Construction Value totals will be provided at a later date.

• highlights of Commercial Permits Issued:o Use Permits: None issued in April 2021

o New Commercial:• 100 Arrington Rd, Queenstown, Construct 60’ x IOU’ metal building for Economy Tree, 23’ x 60

finished area for offices and stairway on V floor, 76’8” x 60 garage area. 4’ x 233” and 4’ x 60unfinished area for future offices. 2d floor 233” x 60’ unfinished area for future offices

o Commercial Renovations:1 845 Main St, Chester, Renovation to interior — decrease dining area & shorten front counter service

area to expand drive-thru cockpit area. Minor renovation to interior guest area to meet socialdistancing. Repair & replacement to existing interior walls, floors, ceiling grid system. Removal ofinterior wall between guest dining & drive-thru service area. Install new door for pick up and a newdelivery door. Removal of existing drive-thru window, exterior counter & lower wall section tochange to automatic door.

• Inspection and Enforcement Activity:o Citations Issued: 2 (YTD Issued: 13)o Total fines issued: S 1.00000 (YTD Issued: $6,750.00; YTD Paid: $2,250.00)o Nuisance Complaints/Code Violation Inspections Conducted: 21(7 of which in Critical Area) (YTD:91/26)

o Zoning Inspections Conducted: 316 (158 of which within Critical Area) (YTD: 1,118/545)o Liquor Law Compliance Inspections: 11 (YTD: 38)

Apr-21 Apr-20 2021 YTD 2020 YTD

Zoning Boards:

• Board of Appeals— Hearing Date—April 1,2021Case BOA-2 1-02-0085 — CD Reed & Sons Associates, CP - variance to construct dwg. in Buffer — ApprovedCase BOA- BOA-20-10-0076 — George J. Koioulakis — ariance to disturb Buffer - DeniedCase BOA- BOA-2 1-01-0083 — Jones Farm Lane Solar, LLC — reapproval for solar farm — Appro edCase BOA-20- 10-0074 — Delmarva Power & Light Co. — disturbance in Buffer — Approved 1c

hearing Date— Api-il 21, 2021Case BOA-21-02-0087 - Julie Kanto — dwelling/addition in Buffer - ApprovedCase BOA-20-10-0075 — K-Hov Four Seasons — community pier — Appioved w/c

• License Commission (Liquor Board): Meeting Date—Api-il 6,2021

Q ueenstown Mart - New Class “A” beer, i, liquor license — Approved for AdvertisingL&L Liquors — Transfer Class “A” beei, wine, liquor licnese — Approved for athertisingStevensville Ciab Deck — Transfer Class “B” beer & wine license — Approved for advertisingLazy Mermaid - Ne Class “B-D” license — Approved for advertisingKent Isinad Depot — New Class ‘-A” beer, wine, liquor license — WITHDRA’vVNBay Ridge Wine & Spirits — transfer Class “A” beer, wine, liquor license - Appro ed

AGM : amj

3

5

QueenJ4nne sCounty

County Commissioners:James J. Moran, At LargeJack N. Wilson, Jr., District 1Stephen Wilson. District 2Philip L. Dumenil, District 3Christopher M. Corchiarino, District 4

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING110 Vincit St., Suite 104


Telephone Planning: (410) 758-1255Fax Planning: (410) 758-2905

Telephone Permits: (410) 758-4088Fax Permits: (410) 758-3972

TO: County CommissionersTodd Mohn, County Administrator

MEMORANDUM

CC: Planning CommissionEconomic Development Commission

Information Item

FROM:

DATE:

Amy G. Moredock, CFM, Director

June 22, 2021

SUBJECT: Monthly Department Report — May 2021

The following information is compiled by the staff of the Department of Planning and Zoning. The information providedis current as of May 31, 2021.

Planning:

• Long-Range Planning/Community Planning/Text Amendments! Environmental/Critical Area Planning:o Comprehensive Plan

• Wallace Montgomery completed the draft Economic Development & Tourism chapter which wasreviewed by the Planning Commission on May 13 and made available online for review.

• A Special Topic Workshop was held on May 5 regarding Community Plans• Two Technical Committee Meeting were held on May 25 regarding Town Planning and Community

PlansStaff reviewed preliminary Town Planning and Community Plan chapters

o Reports• The 2020 Critical Area Fee In-Lieu report was completed and sent to the Critical Area Commission.• The 2020 Annual Report to the Maryland Department of Planning has been completed.

o Critical Area• Project Review:

• Postal Road, SUB-21-01-0209 - Combine 6 lots into 1• Hickory Ridge, SUB-21-03-0224 -Transferring 0.748ac from lot 3 to lot 2 and transfer

0.646ac for lots 3 to lot 4• Litvinuck, Gregory, SUB-21-02-0213 - Adjust lot lines between P6 & 7• Kentmoor Marina Properties, LLC, SUB 2 1-04-0225 — Reconfigure lots 19 and Parcel 30

6

Narrows Substation (Dream Farm), SP-21-04-0073 — electrical substation

o Meeting Attendance: Comprehensive Plan (weekly), Chesapeake American Water Works AssociationSpring Conference (speaker), multiple meetings for potential projects

• Development Review/Site Plans/Subdivision Plats/Growth Allocations/Adequate Public Facilities:o Administrative Subdivision plat reviews

Postal Road, SUB-21-01-0209 - Combine 6 lots into 1Hickory Ridge, SUB-21-03-0224 -Transferring 0.748ac from lot 3 to lot 2 and transfer 0.646ac for lot 3 to lot 4Perry’s Retreat, 18030008 - Combine 4 lots into 2Litvinuck, Gregory, SUB-21-02-02 13 - Adjust lot lines between P6 & 7

o Minor Subdivision pInt reviewsKent Narrows Marine, SUB-20-08-0191 - Subdivide parcel 429 into 3 lots

o Major Subdivision plat reviewsLiving Waters Church, SUB-20-02-0160 - Relocate the lot lines and subdivide into 10 lotsHayden Estates, SUB-20-10-0203 - Amendment to landscape plan

o Minor Site plan reviewDelmarva Powers Queenstown, SP-20-04-0052 - Electric substationNarrows Substation, SP-21-04-0073 - Electrical substationFaith Bible Church of Sudlersville, SP-21-05-0074 -4,320 sq. ft. addition

o Planning Commission meeting, May 13, 2021Extension Requests: No requests.

• Concept Plan: No reviews.

• Projects:Bluegrass Solar, LLC SP-19-08-0034 - ApprovedTM 11 Parcels 24 and 25 - Sheriff Meredith Rd. Chestertown, MDTM 17 Parcels 4 and 24 - Pinder Hill Rd. Church Hill, MDProposing to construct a utility solar project with an array and inverter area of approximately 266.04acres within a 510.25 acres site boundary (lease area).The applicant is requesting: Major Site Plan approval

Postal Road, LLC SP-20-l0-0070 - ApprovedSouth side of Postal Road, Chester, MDTM 57 Parcels 10, 13, l3A, 14, 15, and 17Proposing to administratively combine six (6) parcels in order to construct two (2), 3-story, 30-unit,residential apartment buildings with an 880 sq. ft. utility building and the associated parking areas.The applicant is requesting: Major Site Plan approval

• Comprehensive Plan Workshop:Lauren Good and Ray Moravec of Wallace Montgomery will lead the commission in aComprehensive Plan work session including a status update and review of the EconomicDevelopment & Tourism chapter.

c3

7

Zoning:

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

Building Permit Tracking 2021

C Permit Applicatins Submitted

EJ Permits Issued

O Residential

O Commercial

May 2021 May 2020 202 1 Year to Date 2020 Year to Date

Permit Applications Submitted 185 205 1,034 574Permits Issued 167 203 851 509

Residential 1 1 1 134 582 373Commercial 56 69 267 136

Construction Value * $5,025,753 * $32,028,440* Construction Value totals will be provided at a later date.

• Highlights of Commercial Permits Issued:o Use Permits:

• None reported

o New Commercial:• 800 Castle Marina, Chester - Down size existing mausoleum structure.

o Commercial Renovations:• 1802 Main St. Chester - Convert 18 11’ x 17 5’ portion of existing storage area into lab offices.

• Inspection and Enforcement Activity:o Citations Issued: 4 (YTD Issued: 18)o Total fines issued: 5500.00 (YTD Issued: S8,250.00; YTD Paid: S3,250.00)o Nuisance Complaints/Code Violation Inspections Conducted: 60(15 of which in Critical Area) (YTD:15l/41)o Zoning Inspections Conducted: 331 (150 of which within Critical Area) (YTD: 1449/695)o Liquor Law Compliance Inspections: 15 (YTD: 53)

Zoning Boards:

• Board of Appeals:• Hearing Date: May 12, 2021 (v/c means “with conditions”)

BOA-21-04-0088 — Chris Sakkos — pier extension — ApprovedBOA-21-02-0086 - Greenlea Development, LLC — expand & pave existing landing strip - Approved w/cBOA-20-07-0069 - Ceilco Partnership — telecommunications tower — Approved v/cBOA-20-l 1-0079 - GSH Slippery Hill, LL -one additional multifamily dwelling - Approved

• License Commission (Liquor Board):• Meeting Date: May 4, 2021

Abate of Md. — Special Temporary License — Dates of Event — June 18 & 19 - ApprovedBull & Goat Brewery — New Class “D” beer, wine & liquor license — Approved for advertising

Queenstown Mart — New Class “A” beer, wine & liquor license — Approved

Building Permit Information (Source: Energov & Sungard):

May-21 May-20 2021 YTO 2020 YTD

Kent Island Depot — New Class ‘A” beer ine & liquor license - WITHDRAWNMeeting Date: May 11, 2021L&L Liquors — Transfei of Class “A” beer, xvine & liquor license — ApprovedStevensville Crab shack — Ne Class D’ beer & wine license — AppiovedLazy Mermaid — New Class “B-D” beet, wine & liquor license - Approved

AGM:arnj

9

TowN OF QUEENSTOWNQUEENSTOWN COMMISSIONERS

P0 Box 4, Queènstown, Maryland 21658410-827-7646 - (Fax) [email protected]

MAY 19, 2021JiSSI1N’c p-,

JUN7’2ipi:i1 —

Dear Property Owner or Local Official:

Town of Queenstown has applied for a Permit to Appropriate and Use Waters of the State, whichhas been assigned permit application number QA2008G01 8/03. The applicant seeks to increasean existing appropriation from an annual average of 70,000 gallons of groundwater per day (god)and an average of 100,000 gpd in the month of maximum use to 275,000 gpd and 400,000 gpd,respectively, for a community water supply for the Town of Queenstown. Water will be withdrawnfrom two existing wells and one new well, all in the Matawan aquifer. The project is located at thenortheast corner of the intersection of Del Rhodes Ave and Friels Road, Queenstown, QueenAnne’s County, Maryland.

Since you are a contiguous property owner or an appropriate local official, you are being notified ofthis application, as required by the Maryland Annotated Code Environment Article §5-506, Yourname has also been placed on the “List of Interested Persons” for the above referenced project.At a later date, you will be notified when the proposed project is being published, any projectedimpacts, and be offered an opportunity to comment and request a public informational hearing onthe matter before a decision is rendered by the State to issue or deny the permit.

The Maryland Department of the Environment, Water and Science Administration (Administration)has created a file for this proposed project. If you wish to review the Administration’s applicationfile or make comments on the application at this time, you may contact the Administration by mailat Water Supply Program, Source Protection and Appropriation Division, 1800 WashingtonBoulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21230 or by phone at 410-537-3590. If you have any questionsconcerning the application, please contact me by phone at 410-827-7646 or by mail at the addresslisted below.

Sincerely, -

wn of eenstownP0 Box 4Queenstown MD 21658

County Seot fiore1706 to 1762

10

Notification to Adjacent Property Owners

Queen Anne’s County Department of Planning and Zoning110 Vincit Street, Suite 104, Centreville, MD 21617Telephone: 410-758-1255 Fax: 410-758-2509E-Mail: [email protected]

Dear Adjacent Property Owner,

In accordance with County regulations, your property has been identified as being adjacent to a proposedproject or development. As part of the requirements of Queen Anne’s County, this notification is part of theapplication package required by the Planning Department for any subdivision or site plan approval. Thisnotification must be in writing and prior to the submittal of the application to the County.

The application package will be submitted to the Planning Department on June 7, 2021

Identification of Property:Tax Map: 56 Block: 11 Parcel: 20 Lot:

Property Address:(if no street address is available because the property is vacant, provide a description of the location)

201 Ellendale Farm Lane. Stevensville, MD 21666

Intent and purpose of the proposed development to be submitted:Relocate the UC zoned portion of “Land Unavailable for Future Non-Residential Development”

Applicant Information:Applicant(s) Name: Reliable Development Company LLCProject Name: EllendaleApplicant(s) Address: 2410 Evergreen Rd, Ste 200, Gambrills, MD 21054Applicant Phone/Email: jdixonreliablecompanies.netApplicant’s Agent: Lane Engineering LLCAgent’s Address: 354 Pennsylvania Ave. Centreville. MD 21617Agent’s Phone/Email: 410-758-2095

Property Owner:(f not the same as the applicant listed above)Name: same as applicant

Address:

This is a notification and does not require a response. All applications are public information once submittedand may be reviewed at the Department of Planning & Zoning during regular business hours from 8:00am —

4:30 pm. Please see attached information on how to contact the Department of Planning & Zoning.

Page 2 of 4 Revised Last: 6.27.2017

11

From West:Take US 301/50 E to US 301 N to MD 213 N intoCentreville. Stay left onto S Commerce Streetand turn R onto Kidwell Avenue then turn Ronto Vincit Street.

From North/East:Take US 301 S to MD 304/Ruthsburg Road Nand then turn L onto Vincit Street.

From South:Take US 50 W to MD 213 N into Centreville.Follow West directions once in Centreville.

A

Directions to Planning & Zoning

Queen Anne’s County Department of Planning and Zoning110 Vincit Street, Suite 104, Centreville, MD 21617Telephone: 410-758-1255 Fax: 410-758-2509E-Mail: [email protected]

I

Page 4 of 4 Revised Last: 6.27.2017

Cucu0Cua.cuEa)-tIC000CuCuCuCucuCuCu0CuCuCCC.)

Cu.00I—0zCu

0CCuCCCuCuCu0a.

a.

cJ

Cu0Ca)O.2

Cu

Cu

Cu

Cu

0C

Q)C

uC

0)

CC

uO

cu

0C

uC

a)

.2OC

Cu

CuC

0.

C.)00

WC

u

<U

)_1>

,(j

Lf)

F.—C.,

2-17-162

•EnSun

5/27/2021

RE: Solar Lease Opportunitys r

fl_ —. .4

iUf LirMIt

County Commissioners Of Queen Anne107 N Liberty St Ste 1Centreville, MD 21617-1 048

My name is Steven Turack, and I represent EnSun, LLC, an American, Pennsylvania based solar energydevelopment company. We are currently exploring the feasibility of solar farms in your area and would likethe opportunity to discuss the benefits that a solar lease could bring to you as a landowner. For yourreference, I have outlined some of the reasons that landowners find themselves interested in a land solarlease:

Q, . Create a long-term revenue stream for landowners and their families, heirs• Supplement the income derived from currently held property through a diversified source• Obtain means to purchase additional property• Estate/Retirement Planning• Contribute towards clean energy movement

I will be reaching out to you soon to discuss these specific opportunities in further detail. If you would preferto reach me immediately, I have included my contact information below.

I very much look forward to discussing solar development with you. In the meantime, please visit our websiteat www.ensun.us to learn more.

Sincerely,

Steven TurackRepresentative of EnSun

Steven Turack(757) [email protected]

.Mcu

[email protected] Town Center Blvd

Suite 145

www.ensun.us Canonsburg, PA 15317

COUNTY ORDINANCE 21-05

A BILL ENTITLED

AN ACT CONCERNING the Expansion of the Kent Narrows Commercial Management and Waterfront Improvement District Established Under Article IV of Chapter 5 of the Code of Public Local Laws of Queen Anne’s County.

FOR THE PURPOSE of expanding the Kent Narrows Commercial Management and Waterfront Improvement District to include Parcel 607, Grid 20, Map 58D, as shown on the Queen Anne’s County Sectional Zoning Maps, currently owned by Lippincott Sailing Yachts, Inc.

BY AMENDING the boundaries of the Kent Narrows Commercial Management and Waterfront Improvement District.

SECTION I

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF QUEEN ANNE’SCOUNTY, MARYLAND that the boundaries of the Kent Narrows Commercial Management and Waterfront District shall be expandedto include Parcel 607, Grid 20, Map 58D as shown on the Sectional Zoning Maps of Queen Anne’s County, Maryland and thatthe maps referenced in Section 5-13 of the Code of Public LocalLaws be and are hereby AMENDED to reflect the same.

SECTION II

BE IT FURTHER ENACTED that this Ordinance shall take effect on the forty-sixth (46th) day following its adoption.

Introduced By: Commissioner Corchiarino

Date: May 11, 2021

Public Hearing Held: June 22, 2021 @ 6:10 pm

Vote:

Date of Adoption:

Effective Date:

1

COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 21-02

A BILL ENTITLED

AN ACT CONCERNING Major and Minor Multifamily Dwellingsand Nonresidential Height Requirements in the Urban Commercial (UC)Zoning District in Queen Anne’s County, Maryland;

FOR THE PURPOSE of adding major and minor multifamilydwellings as a permitted use in the Urban Commercial (UC) Zoning District;providing that the same shall be permitted only as part of a redevelopmentthat includes an existing Marina and other commercial uses; amending theUrban Commercial (UC) District purpose; amending the dimensional andbulk standards and the maximum building height for nonresidential uses inthe Urban Commercial (UC) Zoning District; and generally addressing anddealing with uses, bulk standards and nonresidential height requirements inthe Urban Commercial (UC) Zoning District in Queen Anne’s County;

BY AMENDING Section 18:1-22 of the Code of Public Local Laws ofQueen Anne’s County, Maryland.

SECTION I

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF QUEEN ANNE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND that Section 18:1-22 of the Code of Public Local Laws of Queen Anne’s County be and is hereby AMENDED to read as follows:

(Bold indicates language proposed to be added to the County Code. Strike through indicates language proposed to be deleted from the County Code. Italic indicates the term is defined in APPENDIX – a Glossary.)

18:1-22 Urban Commercial (UC) District

A. Purpose. The Urban Commercial (UC) District is intended to provide primarily for a variety of commercial and limited light industrial uses in predominately urban areas along major highways, as well as limitedmixed use in the form of commercial apartments and multifamily

2

dwellings (in accordance with the provisions prescribed herein). Stringent design and landscaping standards within the UC District are intended to minimize the impacts of highway commercial uses.

B. Permitted Uses

(1)..(32) Major and Minor Multifamily (permitted only as part of a redevelopment that includes an existing Marina and other commercial uses).

C. ….

D. Density/intensity requirements.

(1) Maximum residential density: (not applicable)

(a) Multifamily: 10.0 d/u’s per acre.

(3) No individual use and or tenant space in a structure shall occupy more than 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, except for the following uses:

(a) Auctions;...(r) Multifamily (permitted only as part of a redevelopment that includes an existing Marina and other commercial uses).

E. Dimensional and bulk requirements:

(1) Residential uses: (not applicable) Multifamily

(a) Minimum Open Space Ratio: .20

3

(b) Minimum setbacks: Unless otherwise expressed provided in this Section 18:1-22, the dimensional and bulk standards shall be those prescribed below, and the standards contained in Section 18:1-36 (Planned Residential Development Standards) shall not apply to residential development in this zone.

[1] Front 15 feet.

[2] Side 15 feet.

[3] Rear 15 feet.

[4] Spacing between buildings: 10 feet.

[5] Maximum height: 55 feet (not to exceed four stories).

[6] Minimum lot frontage: 35 feet.

[7] Off-street parking spaces: 1.5 spaces for one- bedroom unit.

[8] Off-street parking spaces: two spaces for two-or-more bedroom unit.

(2) Nonresidential uses.

(a) Maximum impervious surface ratio.

[1] All uses: .80.

[2] In the growth areas, impervious surface ratioallowed can be increased by a maximum of 25% using TDRs in accordance with Chapter 18:1, Part 6, Article XX.

(b) Minimum lot frontage: 35 feet.

4

(c) Minimum setbacks.

[1] Front: 25 feet.

[2] U.S. Routes 50/301: 50 feet.

[3] Arterial: 20 feet.

[4] Side and rear: 10 feet.

(d) Maximum building height:

[1] Telecommunications facilities: 90 feet.

[2] All other: 45 feet 55 feet (not to exceed four stories).

SECTION II

BE IT FURTHER ENACTED that this Ordinance shall take effect on theforty-sixth (46th) day following its adoption.

INTRODUCED BY: Commissioner Moran

DATE: April 27, 2021

PUBLIC HEARING HELD: June 22, 2021 @ 6:15 p.m.

VOTE: __ Yea __ Nay

DATE OF ADOPTION:

EFFECTIVE DATE:

1

COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 21-03

A BILL ENTITLED

AN ACT CONCERNING Self-Storage Uses in the Town Center (TC)Zoning District in Queen Anne’s County, Maryland;

FOR THE PURPOSE of permitting self-storage uses, with interioraccess only in the Town Center (TC) Zoning District in Queen Anne’sCounty; revising the definition of “Light Industrial Use” under the generaldefinition of “Industrial Use”; providing a definition for “Self-StorageFacility (interior access only)”; and generally dealing with and providing forself-storage uses with interior access only in Chapter 18 of the Code ofPublic Local Laws of Queen Anne’s County;

BY AMENDING Section 18:1-28, and the definition of “LightIndustrial Use” in 18 App-1 and ADDING a definition of Self-StorageFacility (interior access only) in 18 App-1 of the Code of Public Local Lawsof Queen Anne’s County, Maryland.

SECTION I

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF QUEEN ANNE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND that Section 18:1-28 and the definitions contained in Chapter 18 App-1 be amended and/or added to as follows:

(Bold indicates language proposed to be added to the County Code. Strike through indicates language proposed to be deleted from the County Code. Italic indicates the term is defined in APPENDIX – a Glossary.)

18:1-28 Town Center (TC) District

18:1-28 C. (1) Permitted uses....(rr) Self-storage facility (interior access only).

2

CHAPTER 18 APPENDIX – a: Glossary

18: App-1 Definitions

INDUSTRIAL USE

A. Any development approved by the County or a municipal corporation that have the following characteristics and include the following categories of use.

(1) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES

Include wholesale distribution and manufacturing activities generally conducted indoors where nuisances associated with theuse, such as noise, odor, smoke and dust, are minimal; blacksmith shops; boat building; miniwarehouses (with and without outdoor storage); self-storage facility (interior access only); materials sales or storage yards (excluding asphalt or concrete mixing); bulk materials or machinery storage (fully enclosed); boat repair and auto repair; carpet and rug cleaning plants; contractors’ offices and equipment storage yards; dry-cleaning and laundry plants serving more than one outlet; extermination shops; food processing and packing plants; fuel oil (storage and sales); furniture cleaning plants; furniture refinishing shops; lumberyards; manufacturing (including the production, processing, cleaning, testing and distribution of materials, goods, foodstuffs and products) in plants with fewer than 500 employees on a single shift; mirror supply and refinishing shops; monument works; ornamental iron workshops; pilot plants; printing plants; scientific (e.g., research,testing or experimental) laboratories; trade shops (including cabinet, carpentry, planning, plumbing, refinishing and paneling); truck terminals; wholesale business and storage (wholesale business are not warehouse clubs that can be joined for a membership fee where a variety of goods are offered in bulk at wholesale or discounted prices); showrooms; incidental retail stores (that do not exceed 25,000 square feet of floor area) associated with building and plumbing supply distribution

3

operations.

SELF-STORAGE FACILITY (interior access only)

A. A building, or group of buildings, which provides individual units accessed solely through interior hallways (with no direct outdoor access to individual units), each unit being leased to an individual for dead storage and not in conjunction with the day-to-day operation of a business.

B. May include an office for the sole purpose of conducting business specific to the Self-storage facility.

SECTION II

BE IT FURTHER ENACTED that this Ordinance shall take effect on theforty-sixth (46th) day following its adoption.

INTRODUCED BY: Commissioner Moran

DATE: April 27, 2021

PUBLIC HEARING HELD: June 22, 2021 @ 6:20 p.m.

VOTE: __ Yea __ Nay

DATE OF ADOPTION:

EFFECTIVE DATE:

Queen Anne's County

Documents

Transcript of Queen Anne's County