Political Implications Of The Extraterrestrial Presence

EXOPOLITICS,\ Political Implications OfThe. Extraterrestrial Presence

1

Z*

-& &

S, iffl

*

> ,i r

» •

Ao'i D1

:—*r

H®irpr

piffnT

M|| «

*, . J

1

r»«

-**

V>•> V

i i i—• n iri

i

i i~drl •,I

r* — r&iALj9«•M

r

M I I

AccordingtoDr.Michael E.Sallaand many otherexpertsinthefieldofETresearch,foralmost70years theUSgovernmenthasengaged inanextensive“officialeffort”ofdisinformation,intimidationandtamperingwith evidencein order tomaintaina non-disclosurepolicy aboutextraterrestrialpresence.Writes Dr.Salla: “Ever since I begantopublishtheearly versionsof the chapters in thisbookin January2003as ‘Study Papers’onmywebsite,http://www.exopolitics.org, Ihavereceived a consistent stream of supportive letters encouraging my research, andunsolicited information from former government, military, intelligence employeesconfirmingmany ofmyhypotheses.Thishas given me hopethateventuallyfulldisclosureoftheextrater-restrialpresenceontheplanetwilloccur,sinceinterest is highandso muchinformationisnow inthepublicarena.”MichaelSallapresentsanastoundingandeye-browraisingalterativehistory of thepast100 years. He postulates that since at least the 1930s every major war and policydecisionhas beeninresponsetoanundisclosedextraterrestrialpresenceonEarth.Hetracesactualevents, rangingfrom theNazi develop-mentof flying saucers to the recentUSinvasionof Iraq, tothisunworldlyelementwithin governmentandsocietalissues.Salla’scasecouldbe easilydismissedasfringeconspiracytheoryexceptthatit is wellsupportedbythe data, answersmanyof recenthistory’smostperplexingmysteriesand,witheachpassingyear, is gainingcredencewith thinkersall around the globe. Read andcontemplatethis thesistoday.Tomorrow,itmay bethenewsheadlines.

—JimMarrsAuthorofRuleby SecrecyandAlienAgenda

Historianswilleventuallylearna hostof academicsinAmericawell knew there was anextraterrestrialpresenceengagingtheplanetEarth and thehumanrace,but did not havethe courage to speak out against the government imposed truth embargo or risk thecriticismsfromuninformed colleagues. Dr. MichaelSalla is not one of them. Lackingneitherthecouragenorthe

2

http://www.exopolitics.org

intellectualhonestytotake on themost importantissue inhistory,heishelpingtofoundanextraordinaryfieldofstudyandpolicy—Exopolitics.This newwayof thinkingabouttheworld isthelogical and inevitableextensionofthecitizen/scienceprocess underway in earnest since 1947 to confirm and understand theextraterrestrialpresence.For six decades the great universities of a free nation have, as regards this issue,completely abrogated their responsibility to seek and to teach the truth, howeverinconvenientthattruthmightbe totheState.This is unacceptableandwillbechanged.Indue course there will be various departments of extraterrestrial studies in everyuniversity and college i nAmerica.And thatpowerfulandappropriate circumstancewillowemuchtoMichaelSalla.

—StephenBassettExecutiveDirectorof theExtraterrestrialPhenomenaPolitical Action Committee

3

EXOPOLITICS

PoliticalImplicationsofTheExtraterrestrialPresence

MichaelE.Salla,PhD

4

Acknowledgements

This bookmarksapersonaltransitionwhere Itraveledfrombeingarespecteduniversityacademicwitharegularsalary,professionalstatusand networkofscholarly peers in thefieldofpeacestudies,toaplacefirmlyon theoutsideof thehallowedhallsofacademia.Inthisstrange territory,mynewresearch interest inextraterrestrials and their politicalimplicationsweredismissed,my peer networkvanished,andmy hope forremunerationformy researchwas non-existent.

This bookwould not have been possiblewere it not for the encouragement andsupportof anumberof individualswhobelievedin theimportanceof this project,andmy abilitiestobreaknew groundina fieldwhich inspiredlittle scholarly inter-est.Theseindividualsstoodby meas I fiercely continued myefforts to researchandwrite in thisnew field while my personal finances dried up, and I found myself struggling tocompletethefinalresearchandwriting.

FirstImustthankCarolAdler,PresidentofDandelionBooks, who ata very earlystage when just a few online articles had been published on my website,www.exopolitics.org,gaveher enthusiasticsupportfor a booktobeeventuallypublishedfrom thesefirstefforts,thatwoulddealwith thepoliticalimpli-cationsofextraterrestrialpresence notdisclosed bynationalgovernments. Shegaveme the confidence thatmywork wassuitablefor a far wideraudience thanI was reaching from mywebsite,andinspiredme tocontinuemyefforts tocontinue theresearchandwriting. Thank you verymuch,Carol!

Anumberofindividualsstandout for their unwaveringsup-portforme while doingthenecessaryresearchandwriting forthisbook,andin theirpersonal encouragement despite the setbacks Iwasexperiencing. First, I’d like to thankmy good friend, Dr.JohnKing, who has beenuntiring in his support and encouragement, and generouslyprovided mewith his holidayhomewhile I completed chapter threeof this book.Greatthanks to JaniceSmith,whowas a steadfast friend in herunwaveringsupport in thosetransitionalperiodswhenIneeded it most.

5


Manythanksalso toSusan Burton, whoprovidedthewarmhos-pitality andresearchenvironmentforwriting chapterstwo andfour.Greatthanksalso toArtMiller,who also openedhishomeandprovidedthe researchenvironmentsoIcouldcomplete the final chapter to this book and edit the entiremanuscript for submission toDandelionBooks, and to Navin Kulshreshtha for being the catalyst to make it happen.Finally, I am grateful to HughMatlockwho also opened his home and provided theresearchenvironmentsothatIcouldsafelyget thisbookthroughthevariousstagesoftheproductionprocess.

I also wish to thank the following individuals for theirgen-erous financial supportthat allowedme tocompletetheresearch,writingandeditingforthisbook:JaniceSmith,FrankScott,WarrenBellis, andVondaandFred Janson. Ialso thankJimGrapekfor hisfinancial supportjust whenIneededit.

Finally, Iwish tothankmy children,SebastianandKalinda,for the sacrificestheyhadto endure as I pursued a field of study that may have sparked the fire of scholarlypassion,butdrainedthe financialresourcessovitalto fulfilling achild’sexpectationsofa “normal” lifestyle in an affluent Western society. I dedicate this book to them and theworld webequeaththem.

6

Preface

The key actors, processes, and institutions that drive politics at the domestic andinternationallevels aredirectlyrelated toanextraterrestrialpresenceonourplanet thathasnotbeendis-closedtothegeneralpublic nor tomostelectedpublic officialssincethe1930s.

Evidencepresented in this booksuggeststhatthe extra-terrestrial presencegoes tothe very core of how key actors, processes and institutions operate in internationalpolitics. An international political system based on disinformation, intimidation andmanipulationhas beenconstructedtohide thetruthaboutthe extraterrestrialpresenceandto maintainanon-disclosurepolicy thathas existedfornearly 70 years.

Key ideasandevidencein thisbookwillbe disturbingforthosewhobelieve that themainactors,processes and institutions that influence the study of international politicshavebeenthoroughlyidentifiedand understoodby scholars,diplomatsandpolicy makers.Anygraduatestudententeringan elite Americanuniversityto studyinternationalrelationsis given a thorough grounding in identifying and analyzing the respective actors,processes and institutions in international politics inorder to emerge as a competentpractitionerofthis social science.

Itisthesegraduatestudentsfrom eliteMaster’slevel inter-nationalpoliticsprogramsat US universities that go on to fill the various state department, think tank, media,congressional and non-profit organizations in the US that require employees to have afirmunderstandingof internationalpolitics.

As a formerAssistantProfessor in oneof theelite graduate programs listed in theAssociationof ProfessionalSchoolsofInternationalAffairs,itwas myprofessionaldutytoassist gradu-ate students in identifying the mainactors, institutions andprocessesresponsibleforinternationalconflict. Myjob inpartic-ular was toidentify anddevelopappropriate conflict resolutionstrategies so that scholars, diplomats and otherinterestedpartiescouldresolvethese conflictsto achieveregionalandglobalpeace.

7

InMay,2001,at the end of five yearsofemploymentin

the School of International Service, American University, Washington DC, I leftthoroughly discouraged with the concep- tual tools, theories and models I hadresearched, taughtandappliedinmy academic appointment. I began toexplorealter-native theories andconcepts thatwouldhelpme identify the core factors that drive andperpetuateinternationalconflict.

This bookcontainsthe resultofmyresearch,conductedwithoutofficial approvalbysupervisors in my new academic appointment as an untenured researcher of“TransformationalPeace”in theCenterforGlobalPeace,AmericanUniversity. Itrevealsthe core actors, institutions and processes that drive international conflict and aredirectly related to an undisclosed extraterrestrial presence. Understanding this ETpresence is essential for the study and practice of international politics, andestablishmentofpeaceon our planet.

If Iamcorrect in my analysisof the evidence supporting such an extraterrestrialpresence,thenit is clearthatthestudyof themain actors, institutionsandprocesses thatmakeup thedisciplineof international politics, are wholly inadequate. Most scholars,diplomats andpolicymakerscommitted to the studyof international politicsand to theresolutionofinternationalconflict areoperatingunderpremisesthat areseverelydeficient.

Thishas madea bad situationworse, since it means that not only are the general publicandelectedofficials deniedknowl-edgeaboutanextraterrestrialpresence,butalso,scholarsbecomecomplicitin this non-disclosure effort.Development ofcomplextheories on international politics thatare based ondeficientassumptions about the truenature of what drives international politics, are a distraction from what is reallyoccurring.

Anyoneintheconstructionindustry knows how importantitistoget thefoundationsright for a structuretobedurableandwithstandunpredictableenvironmentalforces.Yetinthearenaofinternationalpolitics,deficientfoundationsunderlietheveryfabricof howthe scholarlycommunity and informed generalpublicdiscuss,understand and analyzeinternationalpolitics.Consequently,inadequatepoliciesare developedthatmissthepointof whatthe extraterrestrialpresencetellsusaboutthe natureof our societies, thetechnologieswe use,andhow

8

wegoaboutresolvingconflict amongourselvesand withextra-terrestrialraces.

The extraterrestrial presence thathas longbeen denied bypublic officials “in theloop,”has powerfulpolitical implicationsatalllevels of humansociety.Moreimportant,such a presence lies at the core of international and domestic conflict. Yet the actorsprimarily responsible for dealing with international politics and the resolution ofinternational conflict are developing policies that entirely overlook the politicalimplicationsof theextraterrestrialpresence.

Conventional policy makersdo notaddress the core rootsof international politicsandconflict, since they ignore how the extraterrestrial presence influences the actors,institutionsandprocessesthatdrive internationalpolitics.

The researchconducted for this book is an effort toanalyzewhat Ibelieve are thecoreactors,institutionsandprocessesthathelpunderstandthepoliticalimplicationsof theextrater-restrialpresenceonourplanet.I haveattempted to faithfullyusethestrongest evidenceavailablefordeterminingtheextent,scopeandintentionsof this presence.

Undoubtedly,therewillbeflaws inmy analysis sincethis isan entirelynew field ofpolitics,with no obviousprecedentstofollow, tremendousdifficultiesin gainingreliableinformation,andfew supporters in the academic communitywith whom to discuss andcomparethis typeof research.

If thecentralpremiseof this bookiscorrect,which theevi-dencesuggestsisthecase,thennon-disclosureof theextraterrestrial presence would have as itscorollary anextensive“officialeffort”of disinformation,intimidationand tamperingwithevidence, to maintainanon-disclosure policythathasexistedforalmost70 years.

AlthoughI cannotvouch for theveracity of all sourcesused in thisbook, theyhavebeen chosen because they represent the best available evidence of an extraterrestrialpresenceontheplanet.

Also, even if I have been disappointed by the reaction thus far from academiccolleagues,academicadministrators,scholarly

9

think tanks, the mainstream media and“politicalleaders”;butthegeneralpublichas beenvery supportive.

Ever since I began to publish the early versions of the chapters in this book inJanuary 2003 as “Study Papers” on my website, http://www.exopolitics.org, I havereceived a consistent stream of supportive letters encouraging my research, andunsolicited information from former government, military, intelligence employees confirming many of my hypotheses. This has given me hope that eventually fulldisclosureof theextra-terrestrialpresenceonthe planetwilloccur,sinceinterest ishighandso muchinformationisnow inthepublicarena.

Indeed, myownresearch would not have been possiblewere it not for the heroiceffortsof formermilitary and intelli-gence officialswhocame forward to give publictestimony, thereby riskingseverepenalties forbreaking their secrecyoaths; and theeffortsof individualssuchas Dr. StevenGreer,Dr.RichardBoylanand others tomakethesetestimoniesavailabletothegeneralpublic.

Alsosignificant inmaking my researchpossiblehas beentheseminalwork of BuddHopkins,Dr. David Jacobs, andDr. JohnMack, in analyzing hundreds of individualsexperiencing the “abduction” phenomenon. This work has provided valuableinformationonthe intentions,activitiesandcommunicationsrelevanttotheETpresence.It is my sincere hope that this book contributes to the effort to bring about fullgovernment disclosure, once individuals begin to realize the enormity of theconsequencesforinactioninrespondingtotheextraterrestrialpresenceonthisplanet.AlthoughIdon’twant tooverplaytheelementofdangerof thepublicnotresponding,myresearch confirms that the policy consequences of the general public not taking theextraterres-trialpresenceseriouslyareprofound.

I certainlydon’t want to advocate either the position that“extraterrestrials mean usharm”or that “theyareheresolely toassistus.”Evidencesuggests thatextraterrestrialsare a multi- facetedphenomenon with multipleagendas, activitiesandhis- tories thatinteract with global humanity’s own subjective experiences, aspirations and beliefsystems.

10


Overall,Ibelievetheextraterrestrialpresencerepresentsan

opportunity for global humanity to deal quickly and effectively with issues that haveaffectedusformany millennia. Itishowweperceiveandrespondtotheextraterrestrialpresencethatultimatelydetermines theirpoliticalsignificanceforus.Theircompeting intentions,agendas andactivities,althoughpoliti-cally significant,are secondary to theframesof referencewechoose in determiningwhat the extraterrestrial presence politi-callymeanstous.

Ultimately,we are a sovereign racewhose political future lies firmly in our ownhands, not in visiting/resident extraterrestrial races—no matter how advanced theirtechnology, superior theirmental/psychic abilities,orbenevolent their intentions. Thepoliticalimplicationsofthe extraterrestrialpresenceonour planetis therefore entirelyup tohow you andI choosetoperceivethem.

Weneedtochoosewiselywithtruth, honesty,vigilanceandcourageas our constantcompanions.MichaelE.Salla, PhDWashingtonDCSeptember1, 2003

11

Tableof Contents1. The NeedforExopolitics:Implicationsof the

ExtraterrestrialConspiracyTheoriesfor

PolicyMakers 1

2. PoliticalManagementof theExtraterrestrial

Presence—TheChallengetoDemocracy

andLiberty inAmerica 59

3. FoundationsforGlobally Managing ExtraterrestrialAffairs—TheLegacy

of

theNaziGermany–ExtraterrestrialConnection

109

4. ExtraterrestrialInfiltration ofClandestine

OrganizationsEmbeddedinMilitary,Intelligence

andGovernmentDepartments 149

5. USMotivationforPreemptiveWarAgainstIraq:

StargateTechnologyandthe‘Return oftheGods’

191

6. America’sTriumph&Europe’sAngst—TheSecret

Race toControlIraq’sExtraterrestrialHeritage

227

7. FirstContact:PreparingforOpenInteractionwith

ExtraterrestrialRaces 261

13

AbouttheAuthor293Index295

14

Chapter1

The Need forExopolitics:ImplicationsofExtraterrestrialConspiracyTheoriesfor

PolicyMakers1

Accordingto a September2002Roperpoll,two-thirdsof UScitizensdon’t believetheirgovernmentis disclosingthetruthaboutan Extra-Terrestrial(ET)presenceover thelastfifty years in the USA, and 60% supported the Federal government releasing thisinformation.2

InaMay2001 pressconferenceattheNationalPress Club inWashingtonDC., twenty“whistleblowers”from a poolofmorethanonehundredformerUSmilitary, governmentand aviation officials gave verbal testimony and provided physical evidenceon theirparticipationinclandestinegovernmentprojectsinvolv-ing reverseengineering of ETtechnology, collaborative projects with ETs or suppression of information involvingUFOs.3

Thetelevisionmini-seriesproduced byStevenSpielberg,Taken, was seenat least inpart by 31 million US viewers in the sixteen day period from its first episode onDecember2, 2002,andhasstimulatedspeculationthatthe publicis beingpre-paredforofficialgovernmentdisclosureon theETpresenceinthenearfuture.4

Thehistoryof the ET presence hasgenerated numerousbooks, films, articles,websites and conspiracy theories on the various activities and intentions of ETs, andclandestineeffortsby differentgovernmentstorespondtotheETpresence. Manyof thepopular conspiracy theories that emerge out of the growing literature on the ETpresenceareofteninconsistentintermsof theintentions,activitiesandimpactof theETsandoftheclandestinegovernmentorganizationscreatedtorespondtotheETpresence.

16

Theseconspiracytheoriesspanthespectrumfroma

belligerentdesireby ETs todeprivehumanityof its sovereigncontrolof theplanet,toabenevolent desire to help humanity solve its myriad of social, economic andenvironmental problems; and evolve as a species. As far as the involvement ofclandestine government organizations are concerned, conspiracy theories range from non-elected government officials intent on arrogating political power througha“shadowgovernment,”toan enlightenedefforttopreparethegeneralpublicfor thestartlingtruthconcerningtheETpresence.

Theintentions andactivitiesofETsand ofclandestinegovernment organizationscreatedtointerfacewith ETs, ifbothare foundtobe true,haveimportantimplicationsforthe wayelected government officials and the general publicought to respond to thewholeETphenomenonas a politicalchallengewith a rangeofpolicy options.

This becomes especially important with the increasing likelihood that officialgovernment disclosure of an ET presence will instantly catapult the topic from theshadowyworld of con-spiracytheories,alternativescienceandNewAgephilosophy tomainstreampublicpolicy.Suchdisclosure will leadto thebirth of a new field of publicpolicy, ‘exopolitics’, which can be defined as the policy debate over the choicesgovernmentsandpopulationsneed tomakein formulatingandimplement- ing legislativeandpolicyresponsesto thepresenceof ETs inhumanaffairs.

Rather thanleavingseriousstudyofthis new field of publicpolicy toa hypotheticalpost-disclosure world, this book advocates that the majority of public opinionsupportingdisclosureofgovernmentinformationon ETs;theexpandingliteratureontheETpresence; and thequality of evidence substantiating an ET presence, indicate thatexopoliticsis alreadya partof thepoliticallandscape.

Thereisa needtooutlinethemain concepts,theoriesandinformationsourcesusedinexopoliticsas an emergingfield ofpublicpolicy. Thiswillassist boththegeneralpublicwishing tofamiliarize themselves with thevariouspolicy issuesassociatedwith the ETpresence,andundisclosed“specialists”who have informationon a particularaspectoftheETpresence(typically

17

on a “need to know basis”), but lack thebreadthandholisticvision ofwhat isoccurringintheentirespectrumofactivities.In this chapter,I willreview the primarysourcessupporting anETpresence, themainconspiracy theories or perspectives that are generated by these sources; the mainadvocatesof thedif-ferentperspectives,thesupporting evidencefor eachperspective,andthemoralorientationof therespectiveETelementsfoundin eachperspective.I willthen analyze the implications for policy makers and the general public for thoseperspectivesmostsupportedby theevidence.

I conclude thechapterwith a numberof policy recommendations that support theneedforexopoliticsas afieldofstudy.This chapterlays the conceptualfoundationsforsubsequentchaptersandfor developingsuitablepolicyresponsesto theETpresence.Sourcesof InformationThe literatureon theETpresencecomesfrom a diversenum-berofsourcesthatdiffergreatly in terms of their reliability, accuracy, and scholarly standards. Virtually all ofthese sourcesoperate within the politicalcontext of anofficial governmentpolicy thatdeniesany ET presence or a systematic cover up of such a presence by clandestinegovernmentorganizations.

An extensive discussion of the history of the UFO/ET phenomenon has beenconductedbyauthorssuchasRichardDolan,who reportshow thecoveruphasbecomepartof the “national security foundations of theETpresence in theUSand around theglobe.”5

The existence of such an official coverup adds to thediffi- culty of studying theclaimedET presenceandaccuracyofsourcessupportingthe variousperspectivesonsuch a presence, since official non-disclosure suggests either wholesalemisrepresentation or deception by thosesupporting suchper- spectives, or a covertgovernmentprogramdesignedtokeepthisinformationfromelectedpublic officialsandfromthegeneralpublic.

18

If the latter is indeed the case, whichtheevidencetobe

presented in thischapter indicates, then it is clear that thestudy of exopoliticswillbecompounded by officiallysponsored acts of disinformation, official denial, and evenintimidationbyclandestinegovernmentorganizations.

Another of the key approaches by military/intelligence organizations is that of“disinformation,”wherebyinvestigatorsof theET/UFO presencearethrownoff track bypublicofficialswhoreleasedistortedorfalseinformation.Disinformation,in thesenseof information that has a factual core, is presented or “spun” in a way that steersindividuals away from sensitive issues and towards those areas that might distract orconsumetheenergyandresourcesofothers.

Forexample, the famous Eisenhower briefingdocument,basedon what may havebeena factual briefing on theETpres- ence, has been claimed by some to be cleverdisinformationdesignedtodivide and distractresearchersoftheETpresence.6

Therehavebeentestimoniesby formermilitary/intelligencewhistleblowersthatpartsof theirofficial dutieswereto hide,tamperordestroyevidenceassociatedwith anETpresence.7Amongthese former officials is JohnMaynard, a military intelligence analyst for theDefense Intelligence Agency who served in the US military for 21 years. Maynardrevealedthefollowinginan exclusiveinterviewinOctober2001:

Ibecameinvolved [inUFOs]whileoverseasinGermany,Turkey andKorea. Theseareas were not noted for a lot of UFO activity. I was primarily afforded theopportunity to investigate peripherally a few incidents and imple- mentdisinformation ormisinformation programstodivertattention away from themilitary and toward the paranormal and/or UFO [followers] in those areas.However, a point I never revealed to the military, was that my grandmother broughtmeupbelievingthatUFOs existed.

Regardlessofthat point,Iwasstillastaunchconservative(politically) andplacedmymilitary dutiesaheadof mybeliefs.Ihada“country,duty, andhonor”-typeattitude.

19

I believed that because of mydedication,andwhatappearedtobenaïvetéonmypart, mymilitarysuperiorsdid not questionmyactionswhen itcametodebunkingUFO sightings.However,I becamevery intriguedas towhy UFOs were notto becomepublicknowledgeand that they (the government)preferredthat any UFO infor-mationfor publicconsumption stay in the realmoftheparanormaland/ortheunreliableUFOresources.

It tookmeseveralyearsto figureout that this blatantdisregard forpublicopinionwasaplandesignedtokeepandmaintainthepressureof proofon certainele-mentsof our society. The plan was basically toplace the burden of proof on the UFOresearchersandtosteerthe publicawayfromthe militaryorganizationsthatweredirectlyinvolvedin UFOresearch.In thisplanIdeducedthatthemilitarywas usingthemedia tokeep these UFO researchers frommaking too muchof the issue byhavingthemediabrandthemas kooks, weird,paranoidandunbelievable;betteryet, byhavingpeoplewho goaroundchasingafter shadows ina belief thatUFOsarereal and thegovernment is hidingsome- thing. Todate, this plan has workedwell above average, and the general public still has an opinion that followswhateverthemediatells them.8

Another of the key approaches by military/intelligence organizations is that of

intimidationwhich has existedsincethebeginningofthecover up oftheETpresenceandcan bedatedtothemysteriousdeathof a formerUSSecretaryofDefense.Apossiblehighprofile victim of intimidationdesigned tomaintainsecrecyaround the ET presence hasbeenarguedtobeJamesForrestal,theSecretaryofDefenseunderPresidentTruman.9

Forrestal suffered a nervous breakdown in 1948 after com- plaining of beingshadowedby “foreignlookingmen”whosedescription was similar to thenow famous“MeninBlack” latertoplay a prominentrole inintimidatingET/UFOwitnesses.10

TrumanannouncedthathewoulddismissForrestalinJanuary1949. Afterformallyleaving hispositioninMarch, events

20

unfoldedquickly andbyMay22, Forrestalwas founddeadafterallegedlyjumpingfrom his 16thfloor VIPsuiteattheBethesdaNaval Hospital.

EventssurroundingForrestal’ssuicide included significantsecurity lapses thathavelong fuelled speculation that Forrestalwas murdered by a powerful organization thatcould easily pen- etrate the secureBethesda Naval hospital. A number of promi- nentgovernmentandmilitary officials insist thatForrestalwasmurderedbecausehe desiredtorevealthetruthabouttheETpresence.11

If disinformation and intimidation are but two aspects of a series of “official”policiesandpracticestomaintainsecrecyofthe ET presence, then this raises importantquestionsabouthowto confirmthe accuracyandverifiabilityof sourcessup-portingtheETpresence.

Highly credible witness testimonies may be undermined by key documents orrecordsgoingmissingthatsubstantiatethecredibilityand/orclaims of witnessesand/orgovernment/military officials. On the other hand, it cannot be simply assumed thattestimoniesanddocuments concerningthe ET presenceare factual reportsor accuratedocumentsby independentwit-nesses/formergovernmentemployees.Suchreportsmayincasesbepartof an officiallysanctionedprogramof “disinfor-mation”designedtodistractpublicopinioninwholeor inpartfrom thetruthabouttheETpresence.

Iwillnow beginby describingthemain sourcessupporting theETpresence, whichprovide thecontentof the differentETperspectives tobeoutlined later in this chapter.Thesesourceswillbe groupedin terms of seven categories, presented in the order thatwould appear most persuasive for the critical reader in a pre-disclosure politicalenvironment. They will be assigned a ranking in terms of evidentiary strengthsomewhere in therange:Strong-Moderate-Weak.

Indevelopingthese rankings,Iuseasguidethe samereasoningas woulda jury ina courtof law, in siftingthroughavailableevidenceon a particularcase.

Emphasis ison identifying thestrongest evidence andreaching averdict on itsplausibility indetermining guiltor innocence. The rankingsare notused to dismiss therelevance

21

of the evidence of an ET presence providedbydifferentsources,butsolelyto determinewhatevidenceprovidesthestrongest support foranET presence in the minds of thegeneral publicand interested public officials. Theserankings will subsequently be used in analyzing the political significance of differentissuesrelevantto the ET presencethatwill beexaminedinlaterchapters.

CategoryA—WhistleBlowers

Theseare reportsandtestimonies offormergovernment ormilitaryofficials,and/orcivilian aviationpersonnelwhohavehadfirst handexperienceof UFOs and/orevidenceof theETpresence.

ThemostfamousUFO incidentin the US is the reportedcrashof anET occupiedsaucer shaped craft in Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947. Initial finding of Major JesseMarcel, theArmyIntelligenceofficersentto the site,wasthatdebrisfromthecrash wasfrom a “flying disk.”

Theinformationofficerat the RoswellArmy Airbase thenauthorizeda press releaseon themorningofJuly8.12Thisimme-diatelycausedworldwideheadlinesandafterMajorMarcel wasordered to Washington,DC,Brigadier-GeneralRogerRameyannouncedtotheworldpressthatMajor Marcelwas mistakenandthe“flying disc”was an experimentalweatherballoon.

In a subsequent interview years after the incident that boosted claims of agovernmentconspiracyto coverupwhathappenedatRoswell,MajorMarcelassertedthathewassilencedby superiors,andsaid,“Itwas notanythingfrom thisEarth.ThatI’mquitesure of . . . Beingin intelligence,Iwasfamiliar with allmaterialsusedin aircraftandinair travel.Thiswas nothinglikethis. Itcouldnot havebeen.”13

Over the last five decades since the Roswell crash, a slow but steady stream offormergovernmentormilitaryofficialshavecomeforth torevealinformationabouttheETpresence. It should bepointed out that theseformer officials have usually takensecrecy oaths not to reveal information about their formerduties andrun the risk ofconsiderablefinancialor criminal penaltiesfor violatingtheiroaths,as wellas risking

22

reputationsandfriendshipsdevelopedovertheyearsof theirofficialservice.

In thecaseof theUSmilitary, therelevantoath is called the“Oath uponInadvertentExposureto ClassifiedSecurityDataor Information,” and JamesGoodell, a formerAirForceofficer,describestheconsequencesof takingthis oath:

...you sign away your constitutionalrights.Yousign apieceof paper sayingthatif you violate your security agreement . . . without a trial, without the right ofappeal,you’regoingtogototheLeavenworthfederalpenitentiaryfor twentyyears.That’sa real big incentivetokeepyourmouthshut.14

A prominentwhistleblowerrecentlyrevealinghisofficialactivitiesinvolving theET

presenceisa formerseniorPentagonofficial,ColonelPhilip Corso (ret),who served inthe EisenhowerAdministration and later headed the Foreign Technology Desk in theArmy’sResearchandDevelopmentdepartment.Aftermorethanthirtyyearsofsilence,ColonelCorsopubliclyrevealedinhis 1997book,The DayAfter Roswell, thathe led atop secret clandestine project to reverseengineer ET technology recovered from theRoswellcrash.15

He wrotethathis projectsuccessfully released a numberof thesereverseengineeredETtechnologiesforboththemilitaryandcivilian sectors.Companiesthatbenefitedfromthis clan-destineprojectincludedIBM,HughesAircraft, Bell Labs,andDowCorning.Corso claims that the rapid technologicaladvances over the last 50 years, in fiberoptics,integratedcircuit chips,night-visionequipment,andsupertenacityfiberssuchasKevlar bodyarmor,werea directresultof theseclan-destineprojects.

Despiterepeateddenialsof secret governmentprogramsto reverseengineerthe ETtechnologyrecovered at Roswellandothercrashscenes,sustainedgovernmenteffortsat sup-pressionof the ET presencecontinueto be compromised by the disclosureofformermilitary, governmentandaviationoffi-cials thattheyhaveparticipated in theseclandestineprojectsand/orwitnessedUFO’sand/orevenETs.

23

Dr. Steven Greer, director of theDisclosure Project,a

non-profit organization dedicated to ending the official secrecy of the ET presence,introduced a selectnumberof thesewit-nessesto the pressandgeneralpublicat aMay2001PressConference at the National Press Club inWashington DC.Dr.Greerhasgathered the testimoniesofmorethan100witnesseson tapeandvideoformatandmadetheseavailablefor thegeneralpublicandfor a congressionalinquiry.16 Oneof themorerevealingtestimoniesisthatofformerApolloAstronaut,EdgarMitchell:

. . .when I learned that aliens really doexist, Iwasn’ttoo surprised.But what didshock me when I startedinvesti-gatingextra-terrestrial reports adecadeago istheextenttowhich theproofhasbeenhushedup. It isn’t just the US government whichhaskeptquiet aboutalienvisits. It wouldbe arrogant ofanAmerican likemyselfto assumethatETswouldonly chooseto visitmycountry.Indeed,I’veheardconvincingstoriesaboutgovernmentsallover theworld that knowofalien visits—includingtheBritishgovernment.17

AsasourceofinformationonanET presence, formergovernment, military and

aviationofficials havehigh credibilitydue to the activities theyperformed asa part oftheir official positions. The financial and legal penalties these former officials risk inviolatingtheir secrecyoaths,andthepossibledamagetotheirreputationsandfriendships,suggestthatindividualswithhigh integrityare disturbed aboutcontinued non-disclosureof the ET presence and a hidden government conspiracy to cover this up through acampaignofintimidation,disinformationandsecrecy.

In acourtof law, whistleblowertestimoniesare powerfulandcan alonesucceedindetermining guilt or innocence evenwhen no physical evidence can beproduced. Inconclusion,thiscategoryof informationcanberankedas “strong” due to theverifiablecredentials of those claiming to have first hand experience of an ET presence, thecoherenceof theirtestimonies,andtheir overall number.

24

Category B—Abductions/Contacts

Much of the information derived from individuals claiming to have beenabducted/contactedby ETcraft hascomethroughthe pioneeringwork of BuddHopkins,Dr. DavidJacobs andDr. JohnMack, in treating individuals apparently suffering theeffectsof suchvisitations.18Thesereportshavegrownin num-berandtypically focusonan experiencewhich hassurprisinguniformitywhereby individualsclaimto havebeenabductedandundergonea seriesofmedicalproceduresby oneormoreETraces.

Usingavarietyoftherapeutictools,includinghypnosis,Dr.Mack found surprisingconsistencyinthedisparate and unre- latedcaseshe examined which he outlined in hisfirstbook:

Each of thethirteenpeoplewhosecasesaredescribedinthis book—indeed,eachoftheseventy-sixabducteeswithwhom Ihave worked—tellsa uniquestory. The indi-vidual differences can probably be accounted for on the basis of the diversepersonalities of the experiencers and the varieties of circumstances within theabductions themselves. But what I have found to be so extraordi- nary from thebeginning ofmy study has beentheread- ily identifiable patterns that emergewhenthe casenarrativesareexaminedcarefully.19

Mack has publishedhis findingsin a numberof booksandscholarlyjournals,which

subsequently became the topic of a popular film. In 1995, Mack co-hosted aconference at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that featured a number ofscholarly presentations of the “abduction phenomenon” and its significance forhumanity.20

The growing number of abduction cases has led to this category rising inimportanceas a crediblesourceofevidenceforan ETpresence.Estimatesof thenumberof abductions in theUS go as high as severalmillion, signifying a huge database ofpotentialinformationon theETpresence.Thisdatabaseiscon-tinuouslybeingrefined asresearchersdevelopthe analytical

25

tools and therapeutic techniques foradequatelydealingwithabduction/contactcases.

Overall, the second category of information is distinguishedby the coherence andconsistencyof the disparateabductionreportsandevidencegatheredof an ETpresence.Researchers and collators of this information are highly credentialed in the use ofpsychological techniques, and have pioneered rigorous standards for assessing theevidence. In a court of law, such testimonies would be very persuasive due to theirconsistencyandcoherence.Thissourcecategorywillhenceberankedstrong.CategoryC—Witness/SightingsReports

Thethird categoryof information sourcesonanET presenceare testimonies of thosewho havewitnessedETs/UFOs.Theseformthe bulkof the availableliterature onthe ETpresence, and are oftenaccompanied by physicalevidence in terms of photographs, radarimages,videos,or evenETartifacts.

Sightings of UFOs/ETs from shortly after the Second World War were sooverwhelming in their frequency and scope that the US Air force launched threeconsecutiveinquiries,desig-natedOperationSign (1947–48); OperationGrudge(1948–52);andOperationBlueBook (1952–69).21

ProjectBlueBook dismissedtheoverwhelmingmass oftheevidencegivenin 12,618sightingsas misidentifiedaircraftorexplainableby naturalcauses,and left a relativelysmallpropor-tionof cases,701,as “unidentified.”An independentassess-mentbytheUniversityofColorado, theCondon Report, recommended terminating ProjectBlueBook.22

Rather than ending the matter of UFO visitation, this only generated morecontroversy over what many argued to be theChairman’s bias in ignoring importantevidenceandrecom-mendingterminationof theProject.23Formany,the Condonreportwasyetanother instanceofacleverlyorchestratedsecretgovernment conspiracy tohidethetruthfromtheAmericanpublic.

Despite thecontroversy over termination of themostwellknown official inquiryinto theUFOphenomenon,new witness

26

reportscontinuedtostreamin, addingtothealreadyimpres-sive amountofmaterialsupportingan ETpresence.Prominentamongthosedissatisfiedwith the terminationof ProjectBlueBookanddesiringamore thoroughandtransparentinquirywas Dr.AllenHynek.24

Aprominentastronomer,Dr.HynekservedastheAstronomicalconsultantonprojects Grudge and Blue Book between 1949–69; and began as a prominent debunkerofwhathedisparagedasthe“‘psychologicalpostwarcraze’forflying saucersthatseemedtobe sweeping the country and at thenaïveté and gullibility of our fellowhumanbeingswho werebeing taken in by such obvious‘nonsense’.”25 He subsequentlybecame a powerful advocate of the credibility of the evidence supporting an ETpresence;andgaveinterviews,wrote exten-sively, andorganizedscholarlyresearch oftheUFOphenome-nonas Directorof theCenterforUFOstudies.26

An initiativefundedbyLaurenceRockefellerin the early1990sresultedinareportthatwasdistributedtothe USCongressandtopolicy makersaroundtheworld. Itwas subse-quently publishedastheUFOBriefing Document: BestAvailableEvidence.27Thiswas a compilationof thebestsight-ingscasesthatcouldbeusedtocompelgovernmentstofullydiscloseallinformationon UFOs/ETs.

StevenGreer’sDisclosureProjectwasalsosignificantincompiling witnesstestimoniesconcerning UFOs/ETs.28OrganizationssuchastheMutualUFONetworkcontinuetomaintainapopularwebsite,holdannualmeetingswiththemostrecentevidenceon sightings,andsponsordiscussionofdevelopmentsinthefield ofUFO investigation.29

Overall,the third category of information is distinguishedby the coherence andconsistency of the disparate witness reports and evidence gathered of an ET/UFOpresence.Theresearchersandcollatorsof this informationarehighly creden-tialedandtypically userigorouslydevelopedscientificassess-mentstandards.

AlthoughthiscategoryprovidesstrongevidenceoftheexistenceofUFOsasaircraftsurpassingthe capabilitiesofpubliclyknownaircraft,thereisdebate whether thesearegenuineET pilotedcraftortop secretmilitaryvehicles.In a

27

court of law, such testimonies would beverypersuasiveofUFOs but would leadtosomeuncertaintyover theextentofETinvolvement.Thissourcecategorywillhenceberankedstrong-moderate.

CategoryD—DocumentaryEvidence

In the1980sa numberof documents begantobe “leaked” toUFO investigators thatprovidedremarkablesupportfortheexistenceofETsandgovernmenteffortstorespondtotheETpresence.TheseleakeddocumentscoveredsuchtopicsasPresidentTruman’sexecutive order establishing a top secret committee to coordinate ET affairs,compositionof thepolicycoordinatinggroupestablishedbyTruman—Majestic12;abriefing document to President Eisenhower; reports by a secret “Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit”embedded in Army Intel- ligence;and a report by Albert Einsteinand MaxOppenheimeronrelationswithETraces.30

Ever since their appearance, the Majestic documents have aroused greatcontroversy. Wellknown criticPhillipKlassdeclared:“Either [the documents] arethebiggestnews story ofthepasttwomillenniaoroneofthebiggestconseverattemptedagainstthepublic.”31

Another source of evidence on ET/UFO related issues concerns previouslyclassified documents obtained through a variety of individuals gaining access togovernment/military departments through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)requests.The mostextensivecollectionofpreviouslyclassifieddocumentsgainedthroughFOIArequests is theBlackVault,anonlinewebsitestarted by JohnGreenewald, Jr. in1996.32Thedatabasehas extensiveinformationon a rangeof projectsthatareof interesttoresearchersof theETpresence.

However, the most sensitive information on the ET presence is not released through the FOIA process due to the exemption that exists for de-classification ofdocumentsthathavenationalsecurityimplications.Afederaljudgecan simplyupholdtheright oftherelevantagencytonot releasetheinfor-mationthatfallsunderoneof thenineexemptionsthatrelatetodeclassificationofclassifieddocuments.

28

These exemptionsinclude:nationaldefenseorforeignpolicy,

privacy of individuals, proprietary interests of business, and functioning of thegovernment.

In sum,evidenceavailableforsubstantiatingarangeofissues,projectsand eventsconcerningETpresence is limited inscope anddetail,andonly relates to declassifieddocumentsthat aFederal judge would deeminsufficient in terms ofnationalsecurityimplications to warrantexclusion from FOIA. Furthermore, it cannot be discounted thatreleaseddocumentsmayin somecasesbe partofacoordinateddisinformationstrategydesignedtomisleadresearchersof theETpresence.

Leakeddocumentsobtainedoutsideof the FOIA processraiseimportant questionsabouttheirlegitimacyandaccuracy,but neverthelesscontainawealthof informationfromclassifieddocumentsthat,ifgenuine,previouslyheld thehighestsecurityclassificationof“topsecret.”

Insum,therole ofpublicofficials responsibleforETaffairsin releasingdocumentseitherthroughFOIAor leaking,raisesthepossibilityof disinformationin the timingandsignificance of different documents. Consequently, this category can be given anevidentiaryrankingslightlybelowthefirst twocate-gories.Astrong-moderaterankingisthereforeassignedtothiscategory.

CategoryE—RemoteViewing

The fifth category of sources comes from participants in RemoteViewing projects.RemoteViewing is an intelligence gathering technique thatwas the subject of severalgovernment-fundedprojects organized at the StanfordResearch Institute from the early1970sto1989.33Theseprojectswere initiatedas a resultof a studyof psychictechniquesusedby theSovietUnion anditssatellitestates.

AccordingtoShiela Ostranderand LynnSchroeder,authorsof a 1970book,PsychicDiscoveries Behind the Iron Curtain, The United States was lagging well behind theSoviets in the use of these psychic techniques for such activities as intelli- gencegathering.Indeed,it willbe argued later,in ChapterThree, thatthe psychictechniquesusedbyNazi Germanyin

29

communicatingwithETraceswasinstrumentalingivingita technologicaledgeon boththeWestandtheSovietUnion.

ConfirmationofaremoteviewingprogramcameinSeptember1997withanofficialCIA responseto anFOIArequestfromJohnGreenewaldfor informationon theCIA’sandUSmilitary’sremoteviewing programanduseofpsychics:

As youmayalreadyknow,ProjectStarGatewasone specific, rather short-lived,program that dealt with research into the parapsychological phenomenonknownas“remote viewing.”However, during recentyears we have come to use“Star Gate” as a rubric for a series of CIA and US Military remote viewingresearchprojects.All recordsrelated to yourseconditem,“alldocumentsrelatedto remote viewingandthe useofpsychicsin DoDOperations”are includedin theStarGate collection described below. The projects discussed herein aredefunct;todayCIA does notfundremoteviewing research.34

In theUS, RemoteViewingwas pioneered by researchersRussell Targ andHarold

Puthoffwho trainedremoteviewers tospatiallydislocatea partof theirconsciousnesstodesignated locations, unknown to the remote viewers, in order to gain intelligenceinformation.35 Remoteviewers were simply given a set of coordinates consisting ofrandomlygeneratednumericalcodes,andinstructedtoreporton what they observed.

Theapparent successof these projects asan intelligencegathering tool for an ETpresenceandothertopicsof interest to various intelligence agencies, led to numerousindividualsbeing trained in the rigorous standards andprotocols of this process.Anumberoftheseremoteviewers subsequentlywroteof theirexperiencesin observingtheETpresence,andbegantrainingothersinthis process.

Amongthemoreprominentof thesehas beenDr.CourtneyBrown, who has writtentwo popularbookson RemoteViewingthatfocusontheETpresence,andis attemptingwith manyothers to develop Remote Viewing as a scientifically credible intelligence-gatheringtool.36

30

The informationonETsgatheredbyremoteviewers isoften

startling in its implications. For instance, Brown describes remnants of a Martiancivilizationandthe relationshipwithEarth: “ThereareMartianson Earth butonemustthink clearlyaboutthe implicationsofthisbefore ringingthe alarmbell.TheseMartiansaredesperate.Apparentlythey have verycrudelivingquarterson Mars. They cannotliveon the surface. Their children have no future on their home world. Their home isdestroyed;itisa planetofdust.”37

Perhaps more significantly, remote viewers described a federation of worldsresponsiblefor controllingevolvingplanetssuch as Earth. Invarious sessions, remoteviewers describedthenatureof headquartersof this Federation,andtheways theseETracesinfluencedbehavior.38

Given the novelty and relatively recent emergence of Remote Viewing as anintelligence gathering tool that hasa plausible, though controversial, scientificfoundation,in“psychicresearch”this categoryof informationmay berankedbelowthefirstfourinterms of reliability and objectivity.Therelationshipand historyof remoteviewing in terms of psychic research certainly places itself outside of mainstreamexpectationsofreliableandcredibleinformationonthe ETpresence.

Thequalityandcredentialsofremoteviewersmightimpressajury in acourtoflaw, but testimony provided by remote viewers would be insufficient on its own todetermineguilt or innocence in a case.Although the information provided by remoteviewershasbeenconsistently showntohavehighdegrees of accuracy, the degree ofsubjectivity involved places this category of evidence slightly below “witness” or“whistleblower” testimonies. RemoteViewing can thereforebeassigned an evidentiaryrankingofmoderate.

CategoryF—IndependentArcheology

A sixthcategoryof sourcesis thework of archeologistswhospecializein translatingor interpreting archeological evidence of a historic ET presence. Often led byindependentarcheolo-gistswho operateoutsideofmainstreamarcheologybasedin

31

public institutions and universities, thetheoriesand translationsoftheextensivepublicarchives and monuments fromtheancient world offeredbytheseindependentarcheologists,continuetoattractworld wide audiences.

Among the more publicly prominent is Erich von Daniken,whoseChariots of theGodsbecamea phenomenalbestsellerwhenpublishedin1969.39Anotherbestsellingauthor is Graham Hancock, whose Fingerprints of the Gods, proved to be hugelypopular with its speculative theories based on forgotten ancient civilizations andastronomicalpointersto thehomesofdistantETancestors.40

Anotherperhaps lessprominent butno lesscontroversial example is the Sumerianscholar,ZechariahSitchin whotrans-latedthousandsofancientSumerian cuneiformtexts thatdescribed anancient ETpresence on the planet.41 Sitchin describes hiscontroversial approach to translating Sumerianandotherancientbiblical texts in theprologuetohisfirstbookpublishedin1976:

TheOldTestamenthasfilled my life fromchildhood.Whenthe seed for thisbookwas planted, nearly fifty years ago, I was totally unaware of the then ragingEvolutionversusBible debates.But as a youngschool-boy studyingGenesis in itsoriginalHebrew,Icreatedaconfrontationofmyown. Wewere readingoneday inChapterVIthatwhen GodresolvedtodestroyMankindby theGreatFlood,the“sonsof the deities,”who mar- ried the daughters of men, were upon the Earth. TheHebreworiginalnamedthem,Nefilim;theteacherexplainedit meant “giants”;but Iobjected: didn’t itmean literally “ThoseWho Were Cast Down,”who haddescended to Earth? I was reprimanded and told to accept the traditionalinterpretation.

In theensuingyears,asIhavelearnedthe languagesandhistoryandarchaeologyofthe ancientNearEast,theNefilim becamean obsession.Archaeological findsandthe deciphering of Sumerian, Babylonian, Assyrian, Hittite, Canaanite and otherancienttexts and epic tales

32

increasingly confirmed theaccuracyofthebiblicalreferencestothekingdoms,cities, rulers, places,temples,traderoutes,artifacts, toolsandcustomsof antiquity. Is it notnow time, therefore, to accept the wordof thesesameancientrecordsregardingtheNefilimasvisitorstoEarth from theheavens?42

Althoughformerlyindependent,Sitchin andotherauthorsinthiscategorytypically

producehighqualityworksthatcontinueto generate controversyamongmainstreamarcheo- logists. Thecontroversy and subjectivity surrounding these debates of thearcheologicalevidenceof anancientETpres-enceandaccuratetranslationsof ancienttexts,require a lowrankingtothis categoryof information.

Ina courtof law, suchevidencemightbedeemedhelpfulin uncoveringthe contextorbackgroundto aphenomenon,butwouldhardlybe conclusive. Therefore, evidenceinthiscategorywillbeassigneda rankingofweak-moderate.

CategoryG—Channeling

Theseventhandmostcontroversialsourcesof informationonan ET presence are theworks of thoseclaimingtobe in tele-pathiccommunicationwithdifferent ET races.Amajorityofthese “channels”havefewacademicorprofessionalcreden-tials, yet this hasnotimpededthemfrom gaininginternationalprominenceasleadersorspokespersonsin the Alternative/ New Age movement. In something akin to a burgeoning socialmovementwith global reachand accompanying religiousdevo- tion,manyhundreds ofthousands if not millions of supporters attest to the transformative effect of thesemessagesfrom ETs,andliberatingvalue of thesemessagesforallhumanity.

Intheforewordtooneof thehighly popularbooksby the“channel”BarbaraMarciniak, her sister writes:

Forover tenyears agroupofmultidimensionalbeings—who call themselves thePleiadians—haveblendedandmergedtheir energieswithmysister Barbara,creatingauniqueandengagingrelationship.Theinfusionof the

33

Pleiadian energy into Barbara’s life,mylife,andthelivesof countlessothershas beenmarkedby change. Inaddi- tion, with thesuccessof thePleiadians’ firsttwo books...BarbaraandI foundourselvesoverwhelmed at timesby the abundance of mail we received . . . ThePleiadians say Family of Light[humanscommitted to transforma- tionalchange] are systems busters [emphasisadded]who travel throughtimetosystemsinneedof change,helpingtofacilitatethecollapseofthesesystems.43

Marciniakandmostof these “channels” support the idea that an ET presence has

existed on the planet for millennia, and that there exists an officially sanctioned governmentconspiracythatisglobalinitsreachto keepthispresencesecret from thegeneral public. The testimony of channels in a court of law would obviously becontroversialandnotlikelytobeconclusiveinany way. Nevertheless,theoverwhelmingevi- dence suggesting that ET races do communicate with humans through telepathicexchanges,indicatestheimportanceofnotexcludingthis bodyofevidence.

In terms of the evidentiary standards for informationsources, due to thehighlysubjectivenatureofchanneledmate-rial,thiscategorycan beassignedthelowranking ofweak. This ranking does not dismiss the relevance of this information, but solelyacknowledgesthe difficultyofverifyingandanalyzingsucha form of communicationfor the development of publicpolicy,andresponding to the challenges presented bynon-disclosureof theETpresenceby variousgovernmentofficials.In sum, the sources of information on an ET presence differ widely in terms of:academic andprofessional credentials of thosemakingsuch a case; physical evidenceprovided; subjectivity of those interpreting or providing the evidence; coherenceandconsistencyoftestimoniesconcerninganET presence;intentionsandactivitiesofETs,andtheirmoralorientationwhich typicallyfalls somewhere alongthe range,benevolent-neutral-malevolent.

Whatfollowsisanattempttoanalyzethesedifferentsourcesof informationand theconspiracytheoriesthey generate

34

in termsof four main perspectiveson anETpresence.Each oftheseperspectiveswill beanalyzedaccordingtoitsmainthemes,principalsupporters,evidentiarystrength,andmoralorientationascribedtotheETpresence.IntruderPerspectiveIn the “Intruder perspective,” ETs are depictedas off-world beings that have traveledgreatinterstellardistancesand,with-out announcingthemselves or gainingpermission,have repeat-edlyviolatedUS air spaceandabducted citizensfor geneticexperimentsforpurposesyet tobefullydetermined.Ina pop-ular 1987booktitledIntruders,authorBuddHopkins supports the idea of ETs being intrusive in their manner of collecting andexperimentingwithgeneticmaterialtakenfrom abductees.44

A rather bellicose presentation of the Intruder perspective is made by Col. PhilipCorso,who describestheETsas repeat-edly violatingUSairspace,abductingUScitizensfortheextrac-tion and manipulationofgeneticmaterial,and having purposesthatposeadirectthreattoUSnationalinterests.

Col. Corso advocates that theUS needs to use the recovered ET technology forbuilding a new generation ofweapons capable of shooting down ETs anywherearoundthe planet.Indeed,heclaimsthatoverthe yearsthe US hasbeen verysuccessfulinusingthis reverseengineeredtechnologytoshootdown someoftheseETcraft, but moreeffort and resourcesneedtobecommittedforacomprehensiveglobaldefensiveshield.

Testimonyprovidedby witnessesin the DisclosureProjectsupportCorso’s view thatsucha clandestine operation target- ing ETflights has been underway for some time;however, they depict the ETs as not retaliating to these hostile actions by US militaryforces.45

Anothersupporter of the intruderperspective and its neg-ative implications is Dr.David Jacobswhosebook,The Threat,depictstheETpresenceinthefollowingterms:

Idonot likewhat Isee. Forthefirsttime inover thirtyyearsofresearchingtheUFOphenomenon,Iam frightenedof

35

it. Understanding has not led to afeelingofcontributionoraccomplishment.Rather, ithas led toprofoundappre-hensionforthe future.Theabductionphenomenonisfar more ominousthanIhadthought. Optimism is notthe appropriate responseto the evidence,all of whichstronglysuggests that thealien agendaisprimarilybene-ficialforthemand not forus.46

In contrast,Dr. JohnMack,whoalsoadopts the intruderperspective, describes the

ETpresenceinmoremorallyposi-tive terms.He views theseintruderETsas oftenbeingcatalystsfortransformationalpersonalchangesexperiencedbyabducteesas aresultof their profoundinteractionwithETs.47

Mack finds that abductees often become committed to a number of progressiveglobal causes that give value and mean- ing to their lives. Protecting the globalenvironment,reducingtheuse ofnuclearweaponsand otherdestructivetechnologies,andpeacefulformsof conflictmanagementappearas consis-tentthemesin theET-abducteeinteraction according toMack. Elaborating on this “transformational” aspect of thehumanabductee/contactee,Dr.RichardBoylan writeson thebasisofhis “dialogue”withsuch individuals:

One of themorecommoneffects, in thoseExperiencerswho have had competentdebriefingandcounseling,isasenseofaltered andheightenedconscious. Alongwith that goesthefelt needtobegin“cleaningup one’sact” in respect to practiceswhich are at variancewithhigherconsciousness.Someexperiencersfeeldrawntowardsa vegetarian lifestyle, while otherexperiencershavefelt an imperative toget rid of habitswhich inter- fere with their full awareness and consciousness.These have included jettisoning tobacco, alcohol,marijuana and other drugs,caffeinated coffee, freesugar, andother consciousness-changing substances fromtheirdiets.Ihavehumorouslycomplainedaboutbeingturnedintoa “Zenmonk” by the ETs. But the truth is that I have voluntarily made these changes,becausethey feel betterandtheold habitsrepelme now.48

36

TheETsdescribedbyabducteesandthoseallegedly

recoveredfromdownedUFOsare commonlydescribedasbeingapproximatelyfourfeet tall, with a gray complexion (hence the name ‘Grays’), with a large headdisproportionatetoits small thin andwirybody,with largealmond-shaped eyes,a verysmall mouth,andno organsforsexualreproduction.49

Confirmation of such reports comes from an interview with a former Army/CIAofficerwho describedaliveGray ETseenatasecret militaryfacility: “Hehadthe largehead and bigger eyes, kind of slanted bigger eyes. He looked like he was wear- ingsunglasses because the lenseswere real dark. He had kind of a slim face down to apeakedchinwithjusta littlenosearea,a tiny slit of a mouthandjust holesin thesideofhis headforear openings.”50

The ‘Grays’ home star system is commonly reported as Zeta Reticulum, near theconstellationof Orion.Someformerofficials and/oremployeesinvolvedin clandestinegovernment military projects report to have seen live ETs at various military bases.MichaelWolf, a formermemberof a NationalSecurityCouncil committeethatoversawtheETpresence, claimed that he “metwith extraterrestrial individuals every day in mywork,andsharedlivingquarterswith them.”51

The reports of joint ET-human bases give credence to reports that a treaty wassignedasearlyas1954,duringtheEisenhoweradministration,grantingrightsto ETs toestablishjointbasesfor technologicalsharingonUS soil,andplacingstrictlimits onthebiologicalexperimentationtheGrayswereconductingwithUScitizens.

Theexistence ofsucha treaty between the Eisenhoweradministration andan ETrace has beendisclosedbyanumberof government/militarywhistleblowers.52WilliamCooper,partofaNaval Intelligencebriefingteamfor theCommanderof theUS PacificFleet,narratesthe eventssurroundingthisTreatyfrom classifieddocumentshe claimstohavereadas partofhisofficialduties:

[I]n 1954the race of largenosed GrayAlienswhichhadbeen orbiting the Earthlandedat HollomanAirForceBase.Abasicagreementwas reached.This race

37

identified themselves as originatingfromaPlanet arounda redstar in theConstellationofOrionwhichwe calledBetelgeuse.They statedthattheir planetwas dying andthatatsomeunknownfuture time they would no longerbeabletosurvive there.Thisled toa secondlandingatEdwardsAirForceBase.Thehistoricaleventhadbeenplannedin advanceanddetailsof the treatyhadbeenagreedupon.EisenhowerarrangedtobeinPalmSpringsonvacation.Onthe appointeddaythe Presidentwasspiritedawaytothebaseand theexcusewasgiven tothepress thathe was visiting a dentist. President Eisenhower met with the aliens and a formaltreaty betweentheAlienNationand theUnitedStatesofAmerica was signed.53

Alludingtoa treatysignedby the Eisenhoweradministra-tion, Col. PhillipCorso,a

highly decorated officer who served in Eisenhower’s National Security Council, wrote:“Wehad negoti-ateda kind of surrender with themas longas we couldn’t fight them.Theydictatedtheterms becausethey knewwhatwemostfearedwas disclosure.”54

Another whistleblower to elaborate on this treaty was Phil Schneider, a civilengineerwho had workedon theconstructionofsecretundergroundfacilities,andwhowasfound dead seven months after givinga lecture inMay 1995 with the followinginformation:

Back in 1954, under the Eisenhower administration, the federal government decidedtocircumventtheConstitutionoftheUnitedStatesand form a treatywithalien entities. It was called the 1954 Greada Treaty, which basically made theagreement thatthe aliensinvolved could take a fewcows and testtheir implantingtechniques on a few human beings, but that they had to give details about thepeople involved. Slowly, the aliens altered the bargain until they decided theywouldn’tabideby itatall.55

Former officials involved in clandestine projects run by different government

agencies,claimthat theGrays communicate

38

through telepathic thought exchange, andusethoughttoactivatetheadvancedtechnologyandnavigationinstrumentsoftheirspacecraft.56 Basedon interviews witha range ofETwitnesses, contactees and military/intelligence personnel,Dr. Richard Boylan explains the telepathic communication usedby ETracesand itsrelationshiptothepsychologicaltraumaoftenassociatedwithETencounters:

Becauseextraterrestrialencountersofteninvolvethesuddenappearanceofoneormore extraterrestrialswithoutwarninginanunexpectedlocation,suchasone’sbedroom at night, their appearance can feel, at first, like an invasion. Theextraterrestrials’ use of mental telepathy, and their faculty for reading one’sthoughtsandthecontents of one’s mind,canfeel, to the previ-ously traumatized person,likeanold,familiar,andunwelcomeintrusionintowhatis in ourcultureone’sprivatespace.

Herewe have the clash of two cultures, polar opposite in their assumptions. Inhuman culture (Western modernindustrial culture, anyway), theassumption isthatone’sthoughtsandlivingspaceare private,becauseindividualismisprized.Inextraterrestrialculturesresearchedthusfar,itappears thatlivingspace andthoughtsareinevitably shared,becauseoftheautomatic,two-waynature ofthe mutualtelepathic abilityofallmembers of their society.They live ina sharedmind-field“commons.”57

Dr.JohnMack,inhisevaluationofpatientsexhibitingsymptomsofETabduction,

claims that many of these communicated through telepathy with the Grays.58 Inreports on the content of the telepathic communication with the Grays,abductees/contacteeshavereportedthattheGrays’survivalasa speciesis threateneddueto genetic degradation as a result of the repeated use of cloning for reproductivepurposes.

The Grays say theyneed tocreatea hybridracethatinte-gratesthehumanandGraygenesinorderforthecontinuation

39

of their species. Itisclaimed that with thecreationofthishybridrace,theGrayswillsomehowbeabletotransfertheir“essence”or“consciousness”asindividualsintothe hybrid,therebyperpetuatingthecontinuationof their race.59

The idea that telepathy is the standard communication means of ETs givesplausibilitytotheclaims ofnumerouscivil-iansourcesthattheyhavebeen contactedbyETs andcon-ducted telepathic communication with them. This is especially importantwith information given by “channelers” who claim to be in communication withdifferentETraces.

In sum, the “Intruder perspective” describes the intentions, abduction activities,geneticexperiments, violationsof US andalliedairspace, andadvanced technology ofETs as intrusive.Moral categories used to describe theGray intruders are unclear.Although theiractivitiesare clearly described as intru-sive and authors such as PhilipCorsoandDavid Jacobsvoicetheirsuspicionsabouttheirultimateagenda, there appeartobe few,if any,hostileactionstakenagainstmilitaryforcesaround the globe—or against the civilian population taken aboard and later released from Gray ETVs(ExtraterrestrialVehicles).

Indeed,accountsby JohnMack and RichardBoylan suggestthat the transformationalchangesbroughtaboutin individualsmakesthe “abduction/contact”phenomenonapositiveoneformany ifnot mostindividuals.

Main focus for conspiracy theorists in this perspective are clandestine government agencies desiring towithhold the truth of the ET presence from thegeneralpublic.Sourcesofinformationare drawnfromallsevenevidentiarycategoriesdescribedearlier.Of these,thewhistleblowercategorystandout as themostcompellingduetotheintegrity,credibilityandcoherenceofexperttestimonies.

The growing number of abduction cases and their analysis also provide strongevidentiarysupportforthisperspective.Witness and documentarysourcesalso providestrong-moderateevidentiarysupport.Giventhestrongevidentiaryrankingsascribedtothesefirsttwocategories,conspiracytheoriessurroundingthe intruderperspectivecanbe judgedto havestrongevidentiarysupport.

40

ManipulatorPerspectiveThisperspectivecoversconspiracytheoriessuggestingthatanadvancedraceof ETswith enhanced psychicabilitiesand superior technology, has been either overtlycontrollingorcovertlymanipulatinghumanityeversincethefirsthumanpresenceonthe planet. Elaborating on this theme of ET “manipulation,” Bill Cooper writes:“Throughout our history theAliens havemanipulated and/or ruled the human racethroughvarioussecret societies,religion,magic,witchcraft,andtheoccult.”60

It is claimed that these ETs played a direct role in creating the human species as asource of slave labor, and therefore feel entitled and even responsible forguiding/controlling thehumanraceeitherovertlyby directcontrol or covertly throughhumanproxies.

AccordingtoWilliamBramley:

...the humanracewasonceasourceoflabor foran extraterrestrial civilizationandstillremainsa posses-siontoday.Tokeepcontroloveritspossession and tomaintainEarthas something of a prison, thatothercivilization (“Custodians”) has bred never-endingconflict between human beings, has promoted humanspiritual decay, and has erected on Earth conditions of unremitting physicalhardship.Thissituationhaslastedforthousandsofyears anditcontinuestoday.61

One ofthemost widely cited scholarly sources for conspiracy theorists falling into

this perspective is the Sumerian scholar, Zechariah Sitchin.62 In his translations ofthousandsofSumeriancuneiformtexts,Sitchin tells how an ancientETrace,describedbytheSumeriansas theAnunnaki oras theNephilimintheOldTestament,created humanitybygeneticengineering.Mixingtheir ownDNAwith thatof theprimatesthenexistingonEarth, theAnunnakicreated humanity in order to exploit it as a slave race anda naturalresourcefor theAnunnaki.

Therewere,however,violent disputesbetweendifferentfac-tions of theAnunnaki thatresultedinmuchregionaldestruction

41

and decimation of the captive humanpopulation.Sitchinclaimed these are the samebeings variouslydescribed in theBook of Genesis and theBook of Enoch; and that biblical stories of theElohim, rebel angels and the Serpent,referredto the conflict between different factions of the Anunnaki concerning how tomanagehumanity.63

There were apparently two distinct races among theAnunnaki. One was ahumanoidrace of giants,and thesecond,a non-human race thatwas “serpent-like” inappearance. Thishasgivenrise to the more popular term, ‘Reptilian’ for this secondrace.The author,R.A.Boulay, has extensivelyanalyzedavarietyofhistoricsourcesandargued there issufficient evidence to support the conclusion thatan ancient ET race ofReptiliansinhabitedtheEarth andplayeda role inthecreationofhumanity.64

Sitchin describestheseETracesas havingovertcontrolofthehumanpopulationformillennia, but thenlargely disappear-ingfromthe sceneapproximately4000yearsagoafteranintensefactionalbattlebetweenthem.

Presumably, the bulk of the Anunnaki left the scene, believ- ing it was no longernecessaryto exercisedirectruleoverahumanitythatwas readyfor self-rule.However,arebel cohort that disagreed remained behind, intent on secretly monitoring andinfluencing human affairs from deep underground ET bases to demonstrate theinadequacyof humanitytoexercisestewardshipover theplanetEarth.

Referencesto “serpents”inbiblicalbookssuggest thatelementsof the Reptilianrace stayed behind. Such a scenario is consistent with the chronology used by theEgyptianhisto-rianManethowhoclaimedthatpriorto the 30dynastiesofhumankingsthatruledEgypt,there wasdirectrulebytheGodsandthedemigods.65

The view that remnant Anunnaki ETs are hidden on Earth is supported by Dr.CourtneyBrownandotherswhohavecon-ductedextensiveremote viewingsessionsonthe presence of ET races on and off the planet.66 Brown has concluded that a rebelfactionofAnunnaki,whoheandothersdescribe asReptilians,is concealed onEarthandit is estrangedfromthelargerbodyof their race.

42

According to Stewart Swerdlow, whoclaims tohavepartic-

ipatedinclandestinegovernmentprojectslocated attheMontaukAir force/Navalfacility;67 the investigativejournalist,Jim Marrs;68 and the controversial British author,DavidIcke;69thisremainingbandofAnunnakionEarthhasinfluencedhumanitythroughhuman proxies derived from ET/human interbreeding that eventually became thearistocratic“bluebloods”ofEuropeandothernations.AccordingtoIcke,

. . . a race of interbreeding [‘royal’ reptile-human hybrid] bloodlines . . . werecentered in the Middle East and Near East in the ancient world and, over thethousandsof yearssince,haveexpanded theirpoweracross theglobe . . . creatinginstitutions like religions tomentally and emotionally imprison the masses and setthematwarwitheachother.70

These human elites maintained certain esoteric traditions by which they could

maintaincontactwith those Anunnaki rebelsconcealed in different locationson Earth.Brown, Marrs,Bramley, Ickeandothersclaim thatthis advancedracecovertlyinfluenceshumanityinordertoproduceresourcesthatsustainthesehiddenETs.71

Theauthor/channelAlexCollier, claims that thesmall numberofAnunnaki beingsatthemomentconcealedon Earth eagerlyawait thereturnof theAnunnakielite,who theyhopewillend thesecrecyof theAnunnaki history andpresence, andreestab- lishovertAnunnakicontrol. Thiswill end the need to rule covertly through unreliable humanproxies.72Brown describestheAnunnakiremnantsasoftenbeingin conflictwith the ETintruders,theGrays.73

In the Stargate Conspiracy, Lynne Pickett andClive Prince describe the process bywhich this advanced race of ETs established religion as a control instrument forhumanity.74 They argue that clandestine government agencies are aware of theAnunnaki remnants onEarthand are divided overhowtorespond to the anticipatedreturnof theAnunnakielitesintheimmediatefuture,thatmay attempttoreestablishovertcontrolover theplanet.

43

Brown,PicknettandPrince claimthatclandestinegov-

ernment programs are using “exotic” technologies such as psychotronic weaponsactivatedby thought,enhancedpsychicabilities, “star gates,”and even time travel, tomilitarilypreparefor thereturnof theAnunnakiwho possessa technologysup-posed tobe superiorto anythingreverseengineered fromdownedGray spacecraft.75

A number of individualswho claim to have participated in clandestine militaryprograms with ET races have also reported interacting with or witnessing a largeReptilian speciesthat pre-sumablyis associatedwith the historicAnunnakipresenceonthe planet. Andy Pero, who claims to have been recruited as a super soldier by aclandestinegovernmentorganization,gavetestimonyofsuch an encounter:

On one occasionI was introducedto a Reptilianbeingwhile in an underground basesometimein1989–90. Atfirst Isawa 7-foot tall humanAryan lookingman.He walks towards me and I notice that his image phases out as if somethinginterferedwith an energyfield. He doessomethingtoa deviceon his beltand tellsme, “OK, I’ll show you.” He then pushes some button and then I see his imagechangeintoa 7-foottall lizard like creaturewho lookedlikehe weighedover 400lb.76

According to other participants including MichaelRelfe,Al Bielak and Preston

Nichols,Reptilianbeingsare involvedwithtime/interdimensional traveltechnology, mindcontrol,psychotronicsandotherexoticweapons.77

Conspiracy theories falling into this perspective suggest that humanity needs tocounter subversive effortsof the con- cealedAnunnaki remnants, and prepare for thepotentialthreatposedby thereturningAnunnakiwho may attempttodeprivehumanityoftheir sovereigntyby reestablishingovert controlonthebasisof globalmismanagementby humanelites.

This perspective suggests those Anunnaki remnantsconcealed on Earthcontinue tomanipulate international events through human proxies, to create the rightinternationalenvi-ronmenttoinfluencethedecisionoftheirsuperiors.War,

44

poverty and environmental collapse arepresumedtoconstitutea favorableclimatefor the returnof theAnunnakielites.Theywouldpresent themselvesas saviors of humanity who would solve these problems and “punish” human elitesresponsiblefor them.

Categories usedto describe the Anunnakipresence, incontrast to the Gray ETpresence, clearly fall into themalevo- lent end of themoral spectrum. Thereare fewmorally redemp-tive featuresof theETpresenceconcealed on Earth, and there isalsosuspicion concerning the intentions of the larger body of Anunnaki presumed to bereturning.Incontrasttotheintruderperspectivethat focusedon aclandestinegovernmentconspir-acy nottorevealtheETpresence,this perspectivefocusesonanET conspiracyto subvertandcontrolhumanitythroughhumanproxies.

Primaryinformationsourcesfor conspiracytheoriesin thisperspectivearedrawn,inorder,from thelast threecategories ofRemote Viewing, Independent Archeology, andChanneling.Althoughthese sourceshaveweakto moderateevidentiarystrength,thesmall number of whistleblowers who have come forwardto support the manipulatorperspective suggests ranking this category at the upper end of moderate evidentiarysupport.HelperPerspectiveAccording to conspiracy theories that fall into this perspective, ETs are here to helphumanitydealwith a myriadof political,socioeconomicandenvironmentalproblems,butthisisnotdisclosedto the generalpublicbyclandestinegovernmentagencies.TheETs in this categoryaredescribedas humanoidinappearance, with a heightof 7 feetormore,oftenhaving thephysicalcharacteristicsofNorthernEuropeansandtypicallycalled Nordics or Semites.78 Dr. Michael Wolf claims to have worked with thesehumanoidracesin secretmilitary facilities in the US, andclaims that the “the SemiticsandNordics[ETs]comefromAltair4and 5and fromthePleiades[starsystems].”79

AmorecontroversialdescriptionofthesehelperETsisBillyMeierswhoclaimedtohavebeenvisitedby beingsfromthe

45

Pleiadeswhoallowedhimto photographtheirshipsandtohave extendedcommunication with him.80 Meier quicklyattained celebrity status.Peoplewerecomingfrom aroundtheworldtohearhisstory,thesecret historyof theET-Earthconnection,andtheesotericETphilosophy.

Someof theprincipalsupporters of thehelperperspective includeDr. StevenGreer,whohaspersonallyinterviewedandanalyzedhundredsofwhistleblowertestimoniesonthe ETpresence;Dr. Richard Boylanwhohasintervieweda rangeof“contactees”andmilitary/intelligence“insiders”withknowl-edgeof theETpresence;andAlfredWebre,a formerScienceadviserto theCarterWhiteHousenow based at the StanfordResearchInstitute.Webre is a pioneerin advancedcommuni-cationtechniqueswith ET races.81 Numerous“channelers”ofETracesalsosupporttheperspectiveof an advanced raceofETsquietlyassistinghumanityinitsevolution.82

According to this perspective, the “helper ETs” are here to assist humanity in anumberofinterrelated ways.First,thehelperETsassisthumanityinempoweringitself bydevelopingmore advanced levels of consciousness whereby humans use a greaterproportionoftheirinherent psychiccapacityandspiritualpotential.

The themeof self-empowerment through transformationalactivitiessuchasprayer,meditation and connecting with the energy field of the planet is a recurring one indescriptionsofwhat theHelperETsareattemptingtoteachglobalhumanity.83This was the themepromotedby Meiersin his accountof thephilosophytaughtto himby ETs from the Pleiades who were apparently concerned that self-destruction hadoccurred when earlier human civilizations had integrated Pleiadian technology beforeself-destruction.

AccordingtoMeiers:

Semjase and the Pleiadians who had chose to return again to Earth weredescendantsof a peacefulLyrian[star systemLyra] factionthatnowfelt responsibleforguidingEarthinitsspiritualevolution,so the Earthhumanscould avoid thesetbacks long agoexperiencedbytheir Pleiadianancestors.84

46

CourtneyBrownarguesthathis remoteviewingsessions

consistentlyturn up evidenceofaGalacticFederationof racesthatassistshumanityinitsevolution.85

Asecondway inwhich helperETsassist humanity is to pass down knowledge ofadvancedtechnologiesandalternativeenergysourcesthatare more harmonious withthe biospherewhich they regardasa livingorganism that needs to beprotected.Theearly twentiethcentury inventor,Nikola Tesla, isoftencitedas havingbeen assisted byETsindevelopinganddisseminatingtheseenvironmentallyfriendly technologies.86

Accordingtostatementsfromwitnessesin the DisclosureProject,anumberof “freeenergytechnologies”arepossessedandusedbythe government,butare notdisclosedtothegeneralpopulation.87 Paul Czysz,who has workedfor 38 yearseitherwith theUSAirforceor theexotictechnologiesdepart-mentof the militarycontractor,McDonnell-Douglas,explainswhythesetechnologiesarewithheldas follows:

Thepeople that [sic] haveaccess to [theseadvanced energy technologies] don’tknowhowto letgo of it,becausethey’reafraid ofwho ’sgoingtogettheir handson it.Even thoughtherewould bea tremendousbene-fitto mankind,they’realsoworriedthatsomebodycouldtake thatsameenergysourceanddotheequiva-lentofwhattheydidwiththe USS Cole—insteadofblowingahole intheside, they couldjustobliteratethewhole ship.88

According to interviewsof “government insiders,”RichardBoylan claims that the

B2stealth bomber operates largelyusing anti-gravity technology for its propulsionsystem, but this is not disclosed to the general public who believe it relies onconventionalfuel sources.89

A third way helper ETs assist humanity is to encourage humanity to achieve peaceful resolutionof internationalconflict,andpreventnuclearproliferation and theuse of other destructive weapons. A number of former government andmilitaryofficialshaveprovidedtestimoniesthatsupportthisperspectiveof ETs ashelpers.ETshavedisplayedsignificant

47

concern about nuclearweapons and even,in someinstances,have disarmed them. According to Captain Robert Salas in testimony given inDecember 2000 as part of the Disclosure Project, 16 nuclear-armed missiles weresimultaneouslydis-armedin twoseparatelaunchfacilitiesafterguardsreportedUFOshoveringover two NORAD facilities inMarch 1967.90

Othersourcesreportthatduringthe earlyyearsoftheEisenhoweradministration,agroupofETs secretlymetwithUSgovernmentofficials appointed todealwith theETquestion,and offeredtoassist with a numberof environmental, technological, politicalandsocioeconomicproblems,with thesolecondi-tionthattheUSdismantleitsnucleararsenal.91 When thegovernment officials declined, thisgroup of ETs subsequentlywithdrew and played no role in the government’s clandestine program to reverse engineerETtechnologyforadvancedweaponry.

It is claimedthatthese “helperETs” wouldsubsequentlyconcentrate theireffortswithconsciousnessraisingofthegeneralpublic;warningof thehazardsof nuclearand“exotic” weapon systems reverse engineered from ET technology; limit- ing theenvironmental impact of clandestine projects; encouraging the development ofalternatives to using fossil fuel as an energy source; and preparing the generalpopulaceforeventualdisclosureof theETpresence.

Finally, thehelperETsdescribetheMilkyWay galaxy,andindeedtheuniverse,asbeingpopulatedbynumerousadvancedcivilizations.92ByunderstandingmoreaboutETraces and interstellarpolitics, the helper ETs believe this willhelp the evolution ofhumanity.AlfredWebre, whobrieflyheaded a1977 Special Study on Communications with Extraterrestrials initiated by PresidentCarter, haswritten a book based on the politics of ET races and their interaction withEarth:

Earth appearstobean isolatedplanetinthemidstofapopulatedUniverse.Universesocietyconsistsof highlyorganized andconsciously evolving,advanced civiliza-tions. Universe civilizationsfunctionwithinour owninter-stellar Universe, aswellaswithinotherdimensionsintheUniverse atlarge.AdvancedUniverse civilizationsexist in

48

otherdimensionsparalleltoourown.They accessourownplanet, galaxy,and allof interstellar space.Life-bearingplanetssuch asEarth arepart ofacollectiveUniverse whole,operatingunderUniversal law.ThinkofEarth as partof a Universecommons. Life is implantedand cultivated hereunderthetutelageofmoreadvancedsocieties,inaccordancewiththeover-allprinciplesofUniverse ecology.

Where necessary, Universal law applies restrictive meas- ures to a planet thatendangersthe collectivewhole.Universegovernmentcanremove a planet fromopencirculationwithinUniversesociety.This fateappearstohavehappenedtoEarthin ourdistantpast.Earthhassuffered for eonsas an exopoliticaloutcastamong thecommunity of Universe civilizations. Earth is isolated because it is under intentional quarantine byastruc- tured, rationalUniverse society.Thereare signsaroundusofaUniverseinitiativetoreintegrateEarthintointerplanetarysociety.Itis possible thatEarthmay be permitted torejoin Universe society, under certaincon-ditions,or ata futuretime certain.93

Rapidly growinginformationabout thesehelperETscomesfromanextensive rangeof sources. Formermilitary and government “whistle blowers” have revealed theactivities of clandestine government agencies and interests opposed toincorporatingETtechnologyinto thepublicarena.94Anexten-sive numberofwitnessesof theseHelperETscontinuetomakereportsaboutbeingphysicallyvisitedby helperETsandcom-municating with themeitherby both verbal and/or telepathicmeans, that arecollected and closely analyzed by many highly credentialed individuals andorganizations.95

Furthersourcesof informationareparticipantsin scientific remoteviewingprojectseitherconductedundergovernmentsupervisionor privateorganizations;andindividualswho claimtobe in telepathiccommunicationwith these helperETs whooftenbecomepopular“channels”of insightsfor thegeneralpublic.

49

Insum, theHelperETperspectivedepictstheETpresence

asbeing clearlybenevolent in theirmoralorientation. Their intentions andactivitiesaimedtoassisthumanitydealwith arangeof globalissues,includingrogue ETelementsintent on destabilizing global institutions and the biosphere, or abduct- ing the humanpopulationforgeneticexperiments.

Conspiracy theories that stem from the helper perspective focus on the efforts ofclandestine governmental organizations to suppress informationabout the presence ofthe ET helpers, and even contrive a military conflict with ETs in general in order tomaintain the status quo. Primary information sources for conspiracy theories in thisperspective are drawn from all the categories with the exception of the abductioncategory.The mostpersuasiveisfromthe whistleblowercategory,suggestingstrongevidentiarysupportfor this perspective.WatcherPerspectiveThe fourth perspective can be distinguished from the first three insofar as it reliesexclusively on the last two categories of sources—individuals claiming to be intelepathiccontactwithETs (“channels”)andindependent archeologists.96 Themainideaadvocatedby theseauthors is thatmany ETs areprimarilyhere simply to observehowhumanityresolves itsnumeroussocietalandglobalconflictsat atimewhencosmicenergysurgesinthesolar systemandthegalaxy addstotheintensityof theseconflicts.

According to the Watcher perspective, humanity represents an elaborate galacticexperiment designed by ETs who wish to observe how humanity responds to thegalaxywideenergysurges.

The Watcher perspective views the entire universe as comprised of vibratingenergyfields thatwaxandwaneinlonghistoricalcycles thathave theirorigin in cosmicand galactic energies. The energy fields emanate from the cores of galaxies, andelsewhere in the universe. At different points in these cycles, energy fields will beintensifiedby cosmicand galactic energies that have a cycle similar to that of our sunwhich

50

every 11 years experiencesan increaseintheemissionofSolarFlares, CoronalMass Expulsions,and thevarious electromagneticenergies thatmake upthe SolarWind.Theseenergyshiftsprovetobe profoundin termsof their impact,andaccordingtothis perspective,the futureof planetarycivilizations isdeter-minedby howwell they respondtotheseenergyshifts.

Althoughitmayappear strangeat firstto believethatrealityisnothingbutenergy,quantum physics has indeed shown that sub-atomic particles are made up of rapidlyvibrat-ing energyfields rather thandiscrete particles thatwere earlier thought to be theultimatesubstratumof reality.According toRobertBecker in his best sellingbook,TheBody Electric, the human body is nothing but concentrated electrical and mag- neticenergyfields thatrespondconstantlytotheenergyfieldsof thelargerenvironment.97

Thus, thecontemporaryera, basedon thisperspective,cor-respondsto theendof anumberof importantcelestialcyclesrevealedby theMayanCalendar.Oneis the end ofa Mayancycle of 5,200yearsandanotheris theendof a solar cycle of25,920yearscorrespondingtotheprecessionoftheequinoxes.98

Somearguethatcycles up toas longas 225,000,000yearsalsocometo completionat thistime.99Accordingto JohnMajor Jenkins,thesolar cycle correspondswiththetimeittakesfor the planeof oursolarsystem(theecliptic) to realign itselfwith the“galacticcore” where cosmic and other energies from the center of the galaxy dramaticallyinfluenceconsciousnessthroughouttheplanet.100

These historic shifts in consciousness, according to Jenkins, are described in theMayan,VedicandEgyptiantraditionsandexplainthedramaticriseandfallsofdifferentcivilizationsthroughouttheages.

The profound consciousness shift occurs due to the cyclic transitions andrealignment with the galactic core changing the intensity of all the “energies”—electromagnetic,solar,gravita-tional,cosmic,etc.—thatinfluencelifethroughoutthesolar system. This means, for example, that all the thoughts, feelings and actions thatcombinetoinfluencean individual’sreality areeithermagnifiedor diminished.

51

Inthecaseofamagnification,thishastwopolarized

outcomes. One is thathumancivilization implodes due to the intensification of latentconflictsanddysfunctionalenergiesthatcometo the surfaceof humancollectivelife, ina kind of“planetaryspringcleaning,”andprovetobeunmanageable.Ananalogytohelpunderstandthis is thatof thepsychologicalprocessof “projection” whereinunbalancedindividualsprojectontootherstheir own unresolvedpsychologicalissues.

Ifthiswere tooccurto anextreme degreewithlargenumbersofindividuals,suchasocietycouldimplodeinaviolentcatharticreleaseof repressednegativeemotions.

The second outcome of a magnification of energies influencing humanconsciousnessis thatthe energysurgesmakeit possibleforajumpin evolutionfromthe “dimensional reality” in which a particular civilization finds itself, to a higherdimension where more refined powers of creation are possible. According to anumberof authors,humanciviliza-tioncurrentlyoccupiesa “third densitylevel”andisprepar-ingto makethe transition to the “fifth density level”at theend of the current5000-yearcycle of theMayanCalendarinDecember2012.101

Thisphilosophyof differingdensitylevels thatcanalso bedescribedasmakingupa“multidimensionalreality”canbeunderstoodbythemetaphorof watermoleculesatdifferenttemperatures.At temperatures below0°c,waterfreezesintoice crystals.

Thedegree ofdifficultyorenergyusedinmanipulatingthesewatermoleculeswheninice form intermsofmovement,storage,shapes,etc.,isa metaphorfor thedifficultiesencoun- teredby beingswho live in a low density level such as the thirddensitywhichhumancivilization reportedlyoccupies.At tem-peraturesbetween0 and100°c,water isin liquid form wherein the molecules are much easier to move, store, and place indifferentshapes.

This is a metaphor for the ease with which civilizations are able to shape theirexternalreality accordingtotheenergyused.Finally,water at temperatures above 100°cbecomes a gas where it is easiest to manipulate the water molecules in terms ofmovement,storageandshape.Again, this isametaphorfor

52

theeasewithwhich civilizations areabletoshapetheir externalreality accordingtotheenergyused.

Accordingto thisperspective, the WatcherETs are here to learn howhumanitydealswiththeenergyshiftsthatintensifythe latentconflictsanddysfunctionalenergiesfromhumanhistory.Theydesiretoobservewhether humancivilization implodes,oris successful in making the transitionfroma thirddensity into fourth and thenfifthdensityenvironments.

Althoughit mayappearodd at first to be informedthatadvancedET civilizationsare here to observe and possibly learn from humanity, it may not be so strange if“galactichis-tory” isexplainedfrom theperspectiveof a numberof authorsclaimingtobeintelepathiccommunicationwithETs.102According to these authors, the Milky Way galaxy has witnessed intense armedconflict between large alliances of ET races divided by competing philosophies,histories and genetic heritages. In its most simple terms, these conflicts have beenpolarizedaroundtwo competingvisions abouthow thegalaxyisbestorganized,andtookplaceprimarily intheconstellationofOrion.103

One vision is that all ET races should have an equal role and voice in galacticdecision making,while the other is that the oldest andmost technologically advancedrace,rightfullyhas aprivilegedposition.

Accordingto thisperspective,the mostpowerfulelitesfromthe twosides manymillenniaago,realized thatthecomingcyclicenergeticchanges,whatcanbe termedthe‘Great Shift’, would in most likelihood lead to another galactic war due to theintensification of all the issues that were never completely resolved in previous conflictsandwhichlaydormant.104

Thiswouldbedisastroussincethis wouldmeangreatdev-astationandloss for thoseET civilizations not able to make the transition to a higher density. Only acomprehensivegalacticunitywouldguaranteethatthese latentconflictswouldnotresultin a newGalacticWar, andthatmostcivilizations couldsuccessfullymoveup in densitylevels.

53

However,theseelitesfrom therespectiveETracesrecog-

nized that the intense divisions between them in terms of history, genetics andphilosophy, would in most likelihood not be overcome in time for a comprehensive galacticunionto bereached,therebymakinganothergalacticwar inevitable.

Inordertoovercomethisproblemand avert futuredisaster,the ET elitesdecided tosponsorahybridracethatwouldcomprisethediversegeneticpoolsfoundin the galaxy.As aresultofgenetics,andinterventionsbydifferingET racesatappointed times, thisrace ofbeingswould experienceahistorythatcloselymirroredthatofthe galaxy.Ifthishybrid racecould resolve its internal differences by the time of theGreat Shift toachieveacomprehensivepoliticalunity,thenthiswouldprovideanexamplefor the restof theGalaxyforhow they couldinturn dealwith theseenergeticchanges.

Thus the human race was born as a “GreatGalactic Experiment” whose truepurpose was known only amonga fewof the eliteof the mostpowerfulET races.105 Althoughthesefew elitesfromthe oldestandmostadvancedETcivilizationspresumablyknew thatonly a galacticunionwouldavert futuredisaster, this was not widely acceptedamongthebulk of theETraces thatbelieved their favored viewpointwouldprevail in afuture galacticconflict.This isanalogous to human conflictwhere hard line militaryleadersstronglybelieve theywillmili- tarily prevail in another confrontation, and thus,disagreewithmoreprudentcalls fordialogueandnegotiation.

Those fewETelites that could prophesysuch a futuregalac-ticcalamity sponsoredthe evolution of humanity throughout the varied ET interventions in history, bothbenevolent andmalig-nant, in order to demonstrate to the rest of the Galaxy how tohandle the Great Shift. One of the principal advocates of theWatcher perspective isBarbaraMarciniak,whosewritingshavebecomeaseminalsource in thechanneling community.Marciniak, channelingagroupofETsfrom thePleiadesdescribes this “GreatGalacticExperiment”as follows:

Muchofexistenceisfocusedonyouatthistime,althoughthat isnot tosayeveryonehas their telescopes

54

pointedat Earth.However,there arelegendsinthecosmos,just as therearelegendson Earth, andcosmiclegendsspeakof this timeof changeandrefertoyouasa gemof a geneticlibrary tuckedaway, anexperi-mentmade for a “just-in-case” time.And this experi-menthas beenfoughtoverand discounted, recognizedand forgotten, valued and given away; you haveexperiencedall these eventsin the collectiveof yourconsciousness,inthe cellsofwhoyouare ...Youare the Gods’secret tuckedawayintime,andtheywait toseeifyou canchangefrom oneform of beinginto anotherin a nanosecond—intheir terms; in yours, perhaps it takes a lifetime, a lifetime enriched andextraordinary,aboveandbeyondordinaryexistence.

You have an exquisite opportunity tocreatea completely unique kindofpowerandto bringpur-posefulnessandmeaning toEarth. Cosmic legends arefullof this tale aboutyou humans.Justas your legends on Earth are filledwithtalesofmagicians, at this juncture in timeyouare looked upon in the BookofEarthasmagiciansyourselves,the wholelotofyou,notsimply a few. The heavensholdtherich imprintofelectromagneticaliveness,andasyoumovethroughspace,your planet,solar system,andgalaxy all traverse new territory. This territory hasbeen plannedfor youto encounter,one thatwill recodeyourDNAinthislifetimeto connect you to the multidimensional intelligence that exists beyond yourbiology,andisyourinheritance.106

According to theWatcher perspective, recent human experience in terms of twoWorld Wars in thefirst half of thetwen- tiethcentury,andfears of a thirdWorld Wareitherin thelatterpartof thetwentiethor early twenty-firstcentury,mirroredthehistoryofearlier galacticconflicts. Insofar ashumanityhas beenabletoaverta thirdworld war,thehumanexperimenthas thusfarbeena greatsuccessstory.

55

Humanity has shown how a civilizationcan overcomealong

history of racial and cultural differences, political and economic conflict, andenvironmentaldegradationat the sametimetheGreat Shift intensifiesall theaspectsofthese differences. This viewpoint is clearly outlined by the popular author, Jeleila Starrwho claims to channel a higher dimensional ET race associated with the seeding ofplanetEarth:

Earthis the third of3GrandExperimentsinPolarityIntegration.This means thatsheis a specialplanetsetasidefrom allothersand populated with every species intheknown universefor thespecificpurposeof integra-tion. In this meltingpot ofspecies,andwith theaid ofhighlyevolvedincarnatedsoulsandtheirangels/guides,itishopedthatfullintegrationof theLight andDark can beachieved.If thisoccurs,peacewillreigninthegalaxy and universe.Why?Each specieswillhave theblueprint,created inthe GrandExperimentbytheirstar-seeded children,to resolveany conflictnomatterhow ancient.

Itisthesepainful, ancientirresolvableconflicts betweenraces and speciesthat haveresultedinnumerousgalac-tic wars thathavebroughtaboutthe necessity of thisexperiment.If Earth fails toachievefullintegration,thegalaxieswillbedestroyedbecausetherewon’tbe anywaytoresolvetheconflicts. IfEarth succeedsand peaceis established, the Polarity Gamewillend andall soulswhoachieved integrationwillhavethe opportunitytomoveon tootherrealmsandcreatenew universesandgamesthroughwhich theycancontinueto learnandgrow.107

TheplanetEarth,Humanityandthe galaxy, it is claimed,have a deadline topreparefor this transitiontoa higherdimen-sionalor“density” levelat the end of the current5200yearcycle of theMayan CalendarinDecember2012.108

In sum,theWatcherperspectivesuggeststhata galactic/cosmicconspiracyexistswhere humanityhasbeen setupto

56

createa solutionto a galacticproblemnotof humanity’sownmaking.TheWatcherETsarerepresentedas merelyobservinghowhumanityintegratesitsdiverse heritage and resolves the historic conflicts expected to emerge over the nextdecade. Rather than directly intervening in human affairs, the ETWatchers areportrayedprimarilyasobserverswhooverthecourseof millenniaare somehowabletoinfluenceor decidewhichotherETracesareallowedtointerveneinhumanaffairs.

The ET Watchers are depicted as being able to calculate the effects of suchinterventionsinawaythatpredisposeshumanitytoarriving ata uniquelyhumansolutiontoacomplexgalacticproblem.

Themoral dimensionofthisperspectiveisprimarily neutralduetotheobservationalnature of the ETs described, and the long-term effort involved in promoting andlearning from the “human experiment.” The primary information sources for thisperspective are drawn overwhelmingly from Category G, Channels. Additional evidencecomesfromindependentarchaeologyandremoteviewing buttheselack theclarity and coherence of channeled information. The reliance on chan- neledinformationsuggestsweak evidentiarysupportfor thisperspective.

Despite its weak evidentiarysupport base, it integrates the earlier perspectives intowhat appearstobea coherentframe-work integratingall the otherconspiracytheoriesconcerningtheETpresence.

Furthermore, those advocating this perspective write with clarity of purpose, coherence and persuasiveness that winmany convertswho desireto know the “bigpicture”abouttheETpresenceandhumanhistory.Onemightview this perspec-tiveasthe“mother of all conspiracies,” whereby this grand galactic conspiracy by higherdimensionalET races,laysthefoundationsandrulesforall otherconspiraciesinvolvingETracesandhumanelites.

Summariesfor all theperspectivesexamined,andthevari-ousconspiracytheories,moralorientations,primarysourcesandevidentiarysupportascribedtoeachperspectivecan nowbepresented.

57

Table1:SummaryofETPerspectivesandConspiracyTheories

Perspective Sourceof ETMoral Primary Sources Evidentiary

Conspiracy Orientation (Top4) Support

Intruder Clandestine Neutral Whistleblowers Strong

Government Abductions Organizations Witnesses Documents Manipulator Remnant Malevolent RemoteViewers Moderate

AnunnakiETs Independent Archeology Channels Whistleblowers Helper Clandestine Benevolent Whistleblowers Strong

Government Witnesses Organizations RemoteViewers Documents Observer WatcherETs Neutral Channels Weak

Independent Archeology RemoteViewers

58

Implications of Exopoliticsfor PolicyMakersMuch of what has beenwritten so far willpredictably have little impact in the policymakingcommunity,in theeventof a con-tinuedgovernmentpolicy ofnon-disclosureoftheETpresenceandofclandestine government projects set up to dealwithdifferentaspects of this presence. Recent signals that the US and other governments aredeliberatelyleakinginformationsupportingtheETpresence,suggestthatsomeform ofofficialdisclosuremightoccurinthenearfuture.

Interviews ofa number of former/currentgovernment “insiders” affirm that keypolicymakingbodies embedded in various levels of government, have been recentlypursuingapolicyof acclimation,preparingthegeneralpublicfor disclo-sureof theETpresence.109

The emergenceof hundredsof former government,intelligence and militaryofficials who have become or are willing to become, whistle blowers on theirparticipationinclandestineprojectsand/orsuppressionof informationinvolv-ingETs,supportsclaimsthata gradualdisclosure programisunderway.110

Most prominent among the public disclosures of former military/intelligence officials are the revelationsby Col. PhillipCorsoin his book,The Day After Roswell.Corso’s impeccable military credentials, former leadership positions in the Army’sclandestineResearchand DevelopmentDepartment,and asso-ciation withprominent Republican leaders such as Senator Strom Thurmond, made him a key figure in thegradualdisclo-sureprogramtopreparethegeneralpublic.

Discussionof thepolitical implicationsof an ETpresence isclearlydifficult in anofficial environment of non-disclosure ofsuch a presence. This meansmaking someeffort to determinewhereevidentiarysupport isstrongest inorder for discussionof thepolitical consequences of the ET presence to proceed with least reservations overaccuracyandverifiability.

Of the four perspectives, two were found to haveweakormoderate evidentiarysupport. TheManipulatorperspectivehada rankingof moderate evidentiary support.This suggeststhatanydiscussionofitspolicyimplications,whilepossible,

59

wouldneedtobequalifiedby theneedforstrongerevidencetosupportany conclusionsthatstemfrom this perspective.111

In Chapters Five andSix of this book, this perspective will figure prominently inanalyzing motivations for US led military intervention in Iraq in 2003. The fourthperspective, theWatcher, had theweakest evidentiary support among all of the perspec-tives. Once again, this suggests that any discussion of its policy implications, whilepossible,would needtobequalifiedby theneed forstronger evidence to support anyconclusionsthatstemfrom this perspective.112 For the remainder of this chapter, Iwill brieflyreviewthe twoperspectives,IntruderandHelper,foundtohavethe strongestevidentiarysupport,andtheir implicationsforpolicy makers.

The Intruder perspective has a high degree of evidentiary support and thereforedeservescloseattentionin termsof itspolicyimplications.This perspectiveportraystheET presenceas intrusiveanda potential threat.As such, it lends itself toUS and alliedgovernmentpolicy responsesthat supporttheacqui-sitionanduseof reverseengineeredETweaponryinadditiontootherexoticweaponsgainedinclandestineprojects.

This perspectivesuggestsanongoingmilitaryconfronta-tion inwhich theUSandalliedgovernmentsmilitarily cooper-ateinwaysdesignedtocounterwhat isperceivedasapotentialETthreat.Althoughthismay encouragegreaterglobalpoliticalcooperation,itdoesso on thebasisof a clandestineandcoor-dinatedmilitarybuildup thatwouldatbest translate into a form of non-belligerence, rather than global peace,which char-acterizedmuchof theColdWar era.

A hidden war is therefore underway, in which physical evidence of this conflictwithETsiskepthiddenfrom publicaware-ness,butconsumesnationalresourcesasthosepolicymakersparticipating inclandestine government organizations try toupgrade defenseindustriesto better contain orconfront ETsanywhereon theplanetwheretheymay appear. InChapter Four, this situation will be closely reviewed in terms of howvarious clandestine organizations embedded in military and intelligence branches ofgovernmenthavebeeninfiltratedbyETraces.

As analysis of this perspective pointed out earlier, intrusive- ness can bedistinguishedfrom hostility or aggression.Thereis

60

little evidence that the gray ETs havedisplayedhostilityoraggressiontoward eithermilitary forcesor thecivilian popula-tion. Itmay thereforebeconcludedthatitisprematuretosup-portamilitaryconfrontationwiththisET race.Thissuggeststhatresourcesdevoted toa secret military confrontation need to be restrictedandplacedunderclosescrutinybyelectedpublicofficials who wouldbemoreopen toaresponsiblepol-icydebateover how tointeractwith theGray ETspecies.

The third perspective, the Helper, has strong evidentiary support that meritsdiscussion of its implications for policy makers. This perspective poses a difficultchallengefor thosepolitical leaders,since itisbasedon a policy of disarmament ofarange of reverse engineered and exotic weaponry, nuclear weapons, and otherdestructiveweaponrythatpresumablyharmthebiosphere.For example,weaponssuchas extremely long wave (ELF) sonic waves used for sonar tracking in the oceans,presumablytomonitorETactivities,causegreatharmtomarinelife.

Similarly, theHigh-frequency Active Auroral ResearchProject (HAARP) thatusesmicrowavesdeflectedofftheIonosphere, alsocausesenvironmentaldamageandisarguedtobean instrumentofmind control.113Theseweaponsystemswereincludedinacomprehensive list of space-based weapon systems that Dennis Kucinich, acongressional representativefromOhio, introduced forconsideration asabill by theUSCongressin October2001.114 In implementingsuchawide- rangingdisarmamentprogramasoutlinedinKucinich’sbill,TheSpacePreservationAct,policymakerswouldbe confrontedwith the dilemmaof sacrificingwhattheyperceiveto be thechief meansof a military defensein thecaseof futureconflictwith an ETrace.

HelperETssuggestthatthrougharadicaloverhaulofhumansocietyto empowerindividuals, eradicate social and economic inequalities, adopt environmentally sustainableenergy sources, and use new technologies for communication andtransportation, humanity would ultimately develop a more viable form of globaldefenseagainstETinterference.

Implications for global peace suggested by the ET helper perspective are thatprimary obstaclestopeaceareclandestine

61

government projects that use reverseengineered technologyandexoticweaponswith littleregardto the damage causedto the biosphere, the refusalto disclose the true nature and motivations of the ET helper’s presence, andgovernmentsecrecyover the discovery of alternative energy sources that can relievepressureonthebiosphereas a resultof fossil fuelconsumption.

Accordingly,effortssuchasthe DisclosureProjectorgan-ized by Dr. StephenGreerfocus on the illegal secrecy of these clandestine projects and institutions, and theimportanceofalternativeenergysourcesforpreventingenvironmentalcatas-tropheandinternationalconflict.115

This perspective offers the most far reaching vision of global peace wherehumanitycomestogether to eradicatesocial,environmentandeconomicproblemsbyresponsibly incorporating ET technology. Although the third perspective is morallydesirable, it poses the greatest challenge to policy makers who have exercisedclandestine control over the ETquestion andwhohavean ingrained disposition thatmilitarydefenseisthebestinsuranceagainstintrusive ETactivities andthetechnologicalsuperiorityofsuch races.

Italsosuggeststhattheclandestinedecisionmakingprocessesoriginallydesignedas a safeguard againstET inter- ference, need tobe reassessed and placed under closescrutinyby elected publicofficials who wouldbe moreresponsive to a genuinepublicdebateover how todealwiththedifficultques-tion ofdisarmamentandtheETpresence.PolicyRecommendations:The Needfor ExopoliticsIt has been concluded that of the four perspectives comprising a range of conspiracytheories concerning an ET presence, two have sufficient evidentiary support to beimmediatelyconsid-ered by policymakers,and to be closelystudied in termsof theirpolitical implications.On thebasis of evidence supporting these two perspectives, thefollowing fivepolicy recommenda-tionscan bemade.

62

First, thequality ofevidencesubstantiatinganETpresenceandclandestine government cover up has a significant degree of credibility andpersuasiveness.This supportsthe creationof anew field of publicpolicy, exopolitics,whichwould studythesetwo perspectivesin the currentpoliticalclimateof an officiallysanctionedgovernmentpolicyofnon-disclosureoftheETpresence.

There is therefore a need tooutline themain concepts, theories and informationsourcesusedin exopoliticsas an emerg-ingfieldofpublicpolicy.Furthermore,effortsneed to bedevotedtoanalyzing thepolicy implicationsof exopolitics in allareaswheretheETpresencehas an impact.Second,thereisa needtopromoteofficialgovernmentdisclo-sure of an ET presence,and tomakemore representative thepolicy making process that has evolved ingovernmentresponsesto suchapresence.Themagnitudeofthe issuesraisedby theETpresencerequiresvigorouspublic debateover theETpresence andhow to interactwithETraces.

Thiswouldleadtoa morerepresentativedecisionmakingprocessconcerningtheETpresenceincontrasttowhat theevi-dencesuggestsisa restrictedprocessrun by a smallnumberofgovernmentofficials“appointed”inamannerwhichraises seri-ous concernsover their accountability,constitutionalstatusandlackofcongressionaloversight.Third, thereisaneed to revealthe full nature ofnationalsecurity policiesundertakenbyclandestinegovernmentorgan-izationsinmilitarily respondingto the ETpresence.Evidenceprovidedby a numberof sourcesrevealsa clandestinegovern-mentpolicy thatuses reverse engineered ETweaponry in addition to other exotic weapons gained inclandestineprojectstotargetandbringdownETVs.

Evidencesuggeststhata covertmilitary confrontation hasbeen underwayfor morethan fifty years whereby the US and other major governments have been secretlycooperatinginwaysdesignedto monitor,containandengage inwhatisviewed asapotential ET threat. Such a coordinated militaryresponse around theglobe to an ETpresenceconsumesnational

63

resources as clandestine government organizationstrytoupgradedefenseindustriesto better containor confrontETs,while keeping thegeneralpublicandelectedofficials ignorantof thesemilitary activities.Fourth,there is aneed to releaseintothe publicarenaallknowledgeaboutalternativeenergysources thathavea com-mercial application but arewithheld on national securitygrounds. Substantial evidence suggests that reverse engineered ETtechnologieshave beenusedinthedevelopmentofenergysourcesfor“blackprojects”suchasthe anti-gravitypropulsionsystemthatisclaimedtofuel theB2bomber.Giventheenvironmental impact of the continued useof fossil fuelenergy, there is a need toreleaseinto thepublic arenaallavail-abletechnologiesthathavecommercialapplication.Final policyrecommendation is thatthere needs to be moreeffort in determining theextenttowhich congressionalover-sightis required for organizationscreatedto dealwith theETpresence.EvidencesuggeststhatelectedpublicofficialsincludingevensittingPresidents,havebeendeniedaccesstoinformationaboutthe ET presenceonthebasisofnationalsecurityconsiderations.116

Althoughthe argumentthatnationalsecurityconsidera-tionsmayattimesrequirepublic secrecy and even non-disclosureto most elected public officials, more effortneedstobedevoted to workingoutaneffectiveandconstitutionalprocessestablishingfirmguidelinesforsuch a process.

Even if the relevance of exopolitics as an emerging field of public policy mayjustifiably be questioned in a pre-disclosurepoliticalenvironment, the seriousness ofthe claims, evidence provided by those conducting exopolitical research, and policyimplicationsdrawnbyexopoliticalanalysis,deservecloseattentionfromacademicresearchers,policymakersandthegeneralpublic.Exopoliticsprovidesan opportunityfor under-standinghowhumanitycanbettershare andmanagetheresourcesof thisplanetwith otherspecies,both terrestrialandextraterrestrial, thereby contributing to amore peacefulandharmoniousplanetfor this andfuturegenerations.

64

Notes

1.Thischapterisa revisedandupdatedversion ofa Study Paper,“TheNeed forExopolitics:ImplicationsforPolicyMakersandGlobalPeace,”releasedonJanuary20,2003andpublishedonlineatwww.exopolitics.org. Manythanksto Dr. PeterWeinbergerforhissuggestionson the title of the originalpaper andfor his thoughtfuladviceon organizingthematerial.Thanks also toArtMillerforhelp-ing correcttypographicalerrors.

2.The RoperPoll, “UFOs &ExtraterrestrialLifeAmericans’Beliefs andPersonalExperiences,”preparedfor theSCIFIChannel,September2002,RoperNumber: C205-008232 (www.roper.com). The pollwas conducted by a representative sample of1,021 adultsages18 andover.Thetelephone interviewswere conducted fromAugust23rdthroughAugust25th,2002.3.Stephen Greer,Executive Summary of theDisclosure Project(Crozet, VA.: Disclosure Project, April2001).Website: www.disclosureproject.com. Heclaimsanadditional300witnessesarealso availabletogivetestimony.4. CNN.Com, “‘Taken’ takes Sci Fi to new heights,” Wednesday, December 18, 2002.http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/TV/12/18/scifi.taken.ap/.5.RichardDolan, UFO’s and theNationalSecurity State:Chronologyofa Cover-up1941–1973 (HamptonRoads,2002).6. For discussion of the Briefing Document and similar official documents, see Jim Marrs, Alien Agenda:InvestigatingtheExtraterrestrialPresenceAmongus (HarperPaperbacks,1997),pages160–80.7.Forwitnesstestimoniesaboutparticipationin destroyingor tamper-ing withET/UFO evidence,seeStevenGreer,Disclosure:MilitaryandGovernment Witnesses Reveal theGreatest Secrets inModernHistory (Crossing Point,Inc.,2001).8.TheresadeVeto, “FromDisinformationto Disclosure,” Surfing TheApocalypse (October, 2001).Availableonlineat:http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.com.9.FordiscussionofeventssurroundingForrestral’sbreakdown,dis-missal anddeath,seeDolan,UFO’s andtheNationalSecurity State,pages70–76.10. For discussion of the mysterious ‘Men in Black’ see Albert K.Bender, Flying Saucers and the Three Men(Neville Spearman Limited, 1963). An extract is available online at: http://www.nexusmagazine.com/meninblack.html.11.See,“Testimonyof MasterSergeant, DanMorris,”Disclosure,ed.,StevenGreer(CrossingPoint, Inc. 2001),p.359;andWilliamCooper,Beholda Pale Horse(LightTechnologyCo., 1991),pages198–99.

65


http://www.roper.com

http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/TV/12/18/

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/

12.Fordetailsof the Roswellincident,see JimMarrs,Alien Agenda:

InvestigatingtheExtraterrestrialPresenceAmongUs(Harper Collins,1997),pages133–37.

13.Marrs, AlienAgenda,p.138.14.QuotedinDolan, UFO’sandtheNationalSecurity State,p. xx.15.Corso,The DayAfter Roswell (Pocket Star, 1997).16.StephenGreer,ExecutiveSummaryoftheDisclosureProject.

Website:www.disclosureproject.com.17.QuotedinGreer,Disclosure,p. 55.

18. Budd Hopkins, Missing Times (Ballantine Books, 1990);David Jacobs, Secret Life: Firsthand Accounts ofUFOAbductions (TouchstoneBooks, 1993);John Mack, Abduction: Human Encounters withAliens (NewYork:BallantineBooks,1994); Mack,Passportto theCosmos:HumanTransformationandAlien Encounters(ThreeRiversPress, 2000).

19.JohnMack, Abduction,p. 385.20.Fordiscussionoftheconferenceandpresentations,seeC.D.B.Bryan,CloseEncountersof theFourthKind:AlienAbduction,UFOs, andtheConferenceatMIT(AlfredKnopf, 1995).

21.Theofficial Air forcewebsiteonProjectBlueBookis: www.af.mil/news/factsheets/Unidentified_Flying_Objects_a.html.22.Condon, Edward U. andDaniel S. Gillmor (ed.). Final Report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified FlyingObjects[ConductedbytheUniversityofColoradoUnderContractto the UnitedStatesAirForce], (New York:BantamBooks, 1968).

23.Fordiscussionof the debate surroundingthe Condonreport,seeDolan, UFOs andtheNationalSecurity State,pages312–70.

24.AllenHynek, “TheCondonreportan UFOs,”Bulletin of theAtomicScientists,XXV(4),pages39–42.

25.Hynek, J. Allen:The UFO Experience(Chicago:Henry RegneryCo.,1972), Part1—TheUFO Phenomenon.Introduction:An InnocentinUFO,Land, paragraph4.

26.FormoreinformationontheCenterforUFOstudies,goto:www.cufos.org.

27.DonBerliner,MarieGalbraith,AntonioHuneeus,WhitleyStreiber.UFOBriefing Document,The Best Available Evidence(MassMarketPaperbacks,2000).

28.Greer,Disclosure.29.MUFON has awebsiteathttp://www.mufon.com.

30. These “leaked” documents were published together by Robert andRyan Woods, The MajesticDocumentsBooks.The bookanddocu-mentsareavailableonlineat: http://www.majesticdocuments.com.

31.QuotedinJimMarrs,AlienAgenda:InvestigatingtheExtraterrestrialPresenceAmongUs(HarperPaperbacks,1997),p. 165.

66

http://www.disclosure

http://www.af.mil/

http://www.cufos.org

http://www.mufon.com

http://www.majesticdocuments.com

32.JohnGreenewald,BeyondUFOSecrecy(TheBlackVault,2002).

WebsiteURLis: http://www.blackvault.com. AnotheronlinesourceofUFOdocuments released byFOIA isavailableat:http://www.chez.com/lesovnis/htm/foia.htm.33. In 1990, these intelligence agencies switched their financialsupport for remote viewing to ScienceApplications International Corporation. See Courtney Brown, Cosmic Explorers: ScientificRemote Viewing,Extraterrestrials,andaMessageforMankind(NewYork:SignetPublishing,2000), p.5.Foranexcellentoverviewofremoteviewing, seeMarrs, AlienAgenda,441–519.34.CIAletter(Reference:F-1997-02079) in responsetoJohnGreenwald,September27, 1997. Available onlineattheBlackVault:http://www.bvalphaserver.com/secart72.html.

35.RussellTargandHaroldPuthoff,Mind-Reach:ScientistsLookatPsychic Ability(London: JonathanCape,1977).36.CourtneyBrown, CosmicExplorers;andCosmicVoyage:AScientificDiscovery ofExtraterrestrialsVisitingEarth(New York:Dutton,1996).Extensiveonlineinformationon remoteviewing can be found at the homepage of theInternationalRemoteViewingAssociation:http://www.irva.org/index.shtml.

37.Brown, CosmicVoyage,pages68–69.38.Marrs, AlienAgenda,pages493–96.39.Chariotsof theGods(G.P.Putnam’sSons, 1969).40.GrahamHancock,Fingerprintsof theGods:The Evidenceof Earth’s

LostCivilization (London: ThreeRiversPress, 2000).41.ZechariaSitchin,TheEarthChronicles,Books1–6 (New York:Avon

Books).42.Sitchin,The12thPlanet:Book1ofthe EarthChronicles(Avon

Books, 1976),p. vii.43.BarbaraMarciniak,Family of Light: PleiadiansTalesandLessonsin

Living(Bear&Co., SantaFe, New Mexico), p. xi–xii.44.Budd Hopkins, Intruders:The IncredibleVisitationsatCopleyWoods

(Ballantine Books, 1987).45.ExecutiveSummaryoftheDisclosureProjectBriefingDocument

73–84.Website:http://www.disclosureproject.com.46.David Jacobs,TheThreat: RevealingtheSecretAlienAgenda(SimonandSchuster,1998),p. 20.

47.See JohnMack, PassporttotheCosmos:Human TransformationandAlienEncounters.

48.Richard Boylan,“CloseEncountersAndPersonalTransformation,”citedonlineat: http://drboylan.com/ce4trnf2.html.49. For descriptions ofGrays by abductees, see C.D.B., Bryan, Close Encounters of The Fourth Kind; andJacobs,TheThreat.Foradetailedonlinedescriptionwhich identifiesdifferent“Gray species,”

67

http://www.blackvault.com

http://www.chez.com/lesovnis/htm/foia.htm

http://www.irva.org/index.shtml

http://www.disclosureproject.com

http://drboylan.com/ce4trnf2.html

see RichardBoylan,“TheVariousKinds of StarVisitors,”availableonlineat: http://www.drboylan.com/etraces.html.50.LindaMoultonHowe,“UFOsandEBEs: More InsiderEvidence,”Nexus magazine (August-September, 1998):http://www.nexusmagazine.com/ufosebes.html.51.QuotedbyRichardBoylan,“ExtraterrestrialBaseOnEarth,SanctionedByOfficialsSince1954”:http://drboylan.com/ basespst2.html. Original Source, Michael Wolf, Catchers of Heaven: A Trilogy (DorrancePublishing,1996).52.SeeRichardBoylan,“OfficialWithinMJ-12UFO-SecrecyManagementGroupRevealsInsiderSecrets,” in Boylan and Boylan, Labored Journey To The Stars. Available online at:http://www.drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html. SeealsoWilliam Cooper,“Origin, Identity and Purpose of MJ-12”: http://www.geocities.com/area51/shadowlands/6583/maji007.html; andCooper, Behold a PaleHorse (Light TechnologyPublications,1991), pages201–05;PhilSchneider, MUFONConference Presentation, 1995,available online at: http://www.ufocoverup-conspiracy.com/20.htm; See Dr. Neruda Interview #1: http://www.wingmakers.com; Boylan gives a moreextensivecoverageofeventssurroundingthe Treatysigningin“ExtraterrestrialBaseOnEarth,SanctionedBy OfficialsSince1954,”inBoylanandBoylan,Labored JourneyTo The Stars.Availableonlineat:http://drboylan.com/basespst2.html.53. Cooper, “The Secret Government: Origin, Identity and Purpose of MJ-12,” Paper delivered at MUFONConference1989,Availableonlineat:http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/maji007.html.

54.PhillipCorso,The DayAfter Roswell (Pocket Books, 1997)p. 292.55. Phil Schneider, “MUFON Conference Presentation, May 1995,” available online at:http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/coverup044.html.

56.Corso,The DayAfter Roswell, p. 79.57.RichardBoylan, “The Differential Diagnosis of Close Extra- terrestrial Encounter Syndrome,” onlinearticlepublishedat:http://drboylan.com/diffdxce4a.html.

58.JohnE.Mack, Abduction:HumanEncounterswithAliens.59.Fordiscussionof the hybridracebeingcreated, see Jacobs,The

Threat,pages 128–84.60.MiltonWilliamCooper,“TheSecretGovernment:TheOrigin,Identity,andPurpose ofMJ-12,”availableonlineat:http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/mj12.html.

61.William Bramley,Godsof Eden(Avon, 1989) 37. Also citedin JimMarrs,RuleBySecrecy,TheHiddenHistoryThatConnectsthe

68

http://www.drboylan.com/etraces.html

http://drboylan.com/

http://www.drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html

http://www.ufocoverup-conspiracy.com/20.htm

http://www.wingmakers.com


http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/

http://drboylan.com/diffdxce4a.html

TrilateralCommission,the Freemasons,andtheGreat Pyramids(HarperCollins, 2000)406.

62.ZechariaSitchin, The Earth Chronicles,Books 1–6.63. The Book of Enoch describes in great detail this conflict. An online version can be found at:http://wesley.nnu.edu/noncanon/ot/pseudo/enoch.htm.

64.R.A.Boulay,Flying SerpentsandDragons:TheStoryof Mankind’sReptillian Past (BookTree,1999).

65.Manetho,Manetho,tr.,W.G.Waddell(HarvardUniversityPress, 1940).66.CourtneyBrown, CosmicExplorers.67.StewartSwerdlow,BlueBlood,TrueBlood:Conflict&Creation

(ExpansionsPublishingCo., 2002).68.Jim Marrs, RuleBySecrecy(NewYork:Perennial,2000).69.David Icke,The BiggestSecret,2nd Ed. (Bridge ofLovePublications,

1999).Foronline informationon Ickeand hismost recentwork,goto:http://www.davidicke.com.

70.Citedby JimMarrs,Rule BySecrecy,406. Source:DavidIcke, TheBiggestSecret,p. 1.71.Rather thanmining formaterialresourcessuch as goldandotherpre-ciousmetalsthatSitchindescribesasbeingthe initialreasontheAnunnaki establishedhumanity,Ickeclaims this race useshumansas abasic resourcesupplyinghormonesderivedfromemotionssuch asfearand anger,and using humansas a foodsource(TheBiggestSecret).

72.AlexCollier,DefendingSacredGround:TheAndromedanCompendium,EditedbyValValerian,January1997,RevisedJuly1998.Website:www.lettersfromandromeda.com.

73.CosmicExplorers,159–221.74.LynnPicknett&Clive Prince,TheStargate Conspiracy(NewYork:Berkley Books, 1999).75.Theterm‘exoticweaponssystems’hasbeen definedto includeweaponsdesignedtodamagespaceor naturalecosystems (such as the ionosphereand upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tec- tonic systems with thepurpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space. SpacePreservationAct of 2001 (Introduced in theHouse), HR2977 IH, 107th CONGRESS, 1st Session, H. R. 2977.Website:www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2001/hr2977.html.

76.SeeInterviewwithAndyPero,“ProjectSuperman,”availableat:http://www.hostileinvader.com/ProjectSuperman.html.77.For two ebooksdetailingMichael Relfe’smemoriesofhisencounterswithReptilians,seeTheMarsRecords,publishedonlineat:http://www.themarsrecords.com.SeealsoPrestonNichols& PeterMoon, PyramidsofMontauk:ExplorationsinConsciousness(SkyBooks1995) and“InterviewwithAl Bielek,”ConnectingLink

69

http://wesley.nnu.edu/noncanon/ot/

http://www.davidicke.com

http://www.lettersfromandromeda.com

http://www.fas.org/sgp/

http://www.hostileinvader.com/ProjectSuperman.html

http://www.themarsrecords.com

(Issue19,Oct1993)availableonlineat:http://psychicspy.com/montauk1.html.78.Foradetailed description of the Nordic ETs, see RichardBoylan, “The Various Kinds of Star Visitors”:http://www.drboylan.com/etraces.html.79.QuotedbyRichardBoylan,“ExtraterrestrialBaseOnEarth,SanctionedByOfficials Since1954, NowRevealed.Also Disclosed:SecretU.S.-USSRMannedSpaceStation,PositionedInOrbit ForPast30+ Years,” in Boylan and Boylan, Labored Journey To The Stars. Available online at:http://drboylan.com/basespst2.html.

80.KalK. Korff,SpaceshipsofthePleiades:TheBilly MeierStory(PrometheusBooks, 1995).81.StevenM.Greer,ExtraterrestrialContact:TheEvidence andImplications(CrossingPoint Publications, 1999).RichardBoylan,Labored JourneyTo The Stars:An anthology on human responses, governmental, civilianandNative,toextraterrestrialvisitation,Rev.,2002. Alfred LambremontWebre,Exopolitics:ADecadeof Contact(Universe Books, 1999). Hisbookisavailableonlineat:http://www.universebooks.com.

82.TheseincludeBarbaraMarciniak,FamilyofLight(BearandCo.,1999);LyssaRoyal&KeithPriest,“PreparingforContact: AMetamorphosisof Consciousness”(RoyalPriestResearch,1993);andSheldanNidle, FirstContact(Vancouver:Blue LodgePress, 2000).

83.See Marciniak, FamilyofLight, andNidle, FirstContact.84.CitedinMarrs, Alien Agenda,p. 303. Originalsource:Gary Kinder,

LightYears(Pocket Books, 1987)pages98–99.85.Brown, CosmicExplorers.

86. For information of the connection between Tesla and ETs, see Tim Swartz, Timothy Beckley, The LostJournalsofNikola Tesla: Haarp—ChemtrailsandSecretofAlternative4(GlobalCommunications,2000).87. See testimonies in section 5,Greer, ed., Disclosure, 489–559. Dr.Greer further claims these efforts have beenstymiedbyvestedinterestsopposedtoalternativeenergysources.

88.TestimonyofPaul Czysz,Disclosure,ed.,Greer,page519.89.Boylan, “B-2Stealthbomberas antigravitycraft,” availableonline at:

www.drboylan.com/waregrv2.html.90.See “TestimonyofCaptainRobertSalas, USAirforce,”inDisclosure,Greer,pages 167–71. Seealso ExecutiveSummaryof theDisclosureProjectBriefingDocument,p.49;availableonlineat http://www.disclosureproject.com.91. See Michael Wolf, Catchers of Heaven; and Bill Cooper, Beyond a Pale Horse. Website: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/mj12.html.

70

http://psychicspy.com/

http://www.drboylan.com/

http://drboylan.com/basespst2.html

http://www.universebooks.com

http://www.drboylan.com/waregrv2.html

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/

92.See Nidle, FirstContact.

93.AlfredLambremontWebre,JD,Med,Exopolitics:ADecadeofContact(2000)anebookpublishedonlineat:http://www.universebooks.com/exoone.html.94. See Greer, Extraterrestrial Contact. See for example, Richard Boylan and Lee K. Boylan, CloseExtraterrestrial Encounters: PositiveExperiences With Mysterious Visitors (Wildflower, 1994). Website:

http://www.drboylan.com/w.drboylan.com.95.Themostpopular“channels”advocatingthisperspective includeBarbaraMarciniak,FamilyofLight;RobertShapiro,ShiningtheLight,Vols.1–6(LightTechnologyPublications);JelailaStarr,WeAre theNibiruans:Returnofthe 12th Planet(New Leaf DistributingCo.,1999), andDrunvaloMelchizedek,TheAncientSecret ofthe FlowerofLife,Vol.2(LightTechnologyPublications,2000).96.RobertBeckerandGarySeldon,TheBodyElectric:Electromag-netismandtheFoundationof Life,New York:Quill,1985.

97.JohnMajor Jenkins,Maya Cosmogenesis2012, SantaFe: BearandCo., 1998.98.BarbaraHandClow, ThePleiadianAgenda:A NewCosmologyfortheAge ofLight (Bear and Co., 1995)p.49;JohnMajor Jenkins,MayaCosmogenesis2012 (Bear andCo., 1998).99.JohnMajorJenkins,GalacticAlignment:TheTransformationofConsciousnessAccordingtoMayan,Egyptian,andVedicTraditions(InnerTraditionsInternational,2002).100.ThemostwellknownauthoradvocatingthistimelineisJoseArguelles,The Mayan Factor,Santa Fe: Bearand Company,1987.Fordiscussionofdifferentdimensions/densities,seeLyssaRoyal&KeithPriest, The Prism ofLyra:AnExplorationofHuman GalacticHeritage,Rev.ed.(RoyalPriest Research,1993),pages1–9.101.Someof the popularsourcesfor Galactichistoryinclude:Royal &Priest,ThePrismofLyra;SheldanNidle,First Contact, BarbaraMarciniak., Family of Light; and Fred Stirling, Kirael: The Great Shift, Oughten HousePublication,1998.Themostwell-knownauthoradvocatingthis timelineis JoseArguelles,The MayanFactor(BearandCo., 1987).

102.Forthe conflictin Orion,see Royal andPriest,ThePrismofLyra,39–46.

103.The term‘GreatShift’isusedbyFredStirling, Kirael:The GreatShift(OughtenHousePublication,1998);Website:www.kirael.com.

104.The idea that humanity isa hybrid race comprisingvarious ETgeneticstrandsispromotedby Zecharia Sitchin,Earth Chronicles(Books1–6).For discussionof thegalacticpoliticssurroundingthegeneticmakeup of humanracesand theETinvolvement,seeRoyaland Priest, ThePrism ofLyra,pages67–74.

71

http://www.drboylan.com

http://www.kirael.com

105.Marciniak, Family of Light, pages 186–87. For a similar perspective, seeRoyal and Priest, The Prism ofLyra,67–74.

106.JelailaStar, January3,2003,websiteupdate.107.ThemostwellknownauthoradvocatingthistimelineisJoseArguelles,TheMayanFactor(SantaFe: BearandCompany,1987).See also Jenkins,Cosmogenesis.108.Richard Boylan,Labored JourneyTo TheStars:Ananthology onhuman responses, governmental, civilianandNative,toextraterres-trialvisitation,Rev., 2002:http://www.drboylan.com/aclmatn2.html;Arguelles,The MayanFactor(Bear andCo, 1987).

109.See Greer,ed.,Disclosure.110.For discussionof this perspectivein termsof its policy implications,seeMarrs, Rule by Secrecy;andCourtneyBrown, CosmicExplorers.111.For discussionof this perspectivein termsof its policy implications,seeMarciniak, FamilyofLight.112.For discussionof this perspectivein termsof its policy implications,seeMarciniak, FamilyofLight.

113.JerrySmith,Haarp:TheUltimateWeapon of the Conspiracy:TheMind-ControlConspiracySeries(AdventuresUnlimitedPress, 1998).

114.SpacePreservationAct of 2001 (Introduced in theHouse),HR2977IH,107th CONGRESS, 1st Session,H.R.2977.115.See Greer,ed., Disclosure.Online informationavailableat:http://www.disclosureproject.com.116. Chapter Five willdiscuss theevolution of USpolicy making concerning the ET presence and the erosion ofexecutiveoversightofclandestineorganizations.

72

http://www.drboylan.com/aclmatn2.html

Chapter2

PoliticalManagementof theExtraterrestrialPresence—TheChallengetoDemocracyandLiberty

inAmericaIntroduction117Politicalmanagementof the extraterrestrial(ET)presenceonEarthhasevolvedduringthe courseofthe successive USPresidential administrations thathad to dealwith thepolicy issues that arose once irrefutable proof of such a presence was brought to theattentionofpolicy makers.

This evolutionof responsesby Presidentialadministrationscanbe broken intofivehistoric phases which demonstrate a gradual erosion of Presidential/executive oversight, and the growing autonomy/independence of clandestine organizationsembeddedinmilitary-intelligence and national secur itybranchesof government.This erosionof Presidential/executiveoversight in the formof ultimate controlof theET presence being gradually taken away from elected Presidents and/or theircongressionallyapprovedpoliticalappointmentsappearstohaveallthecharacteristicsofa“politicalcoup.”118Presidents,inthe caseofRepublicans,havebeen reducedtorubberstampsfor thosecontrollingpolitical managementofETissues;or, in thecaseof DemocraticPresidents,topoliticalirrelevance.

Thefirst politicalmanagementphasewascrisis manage-mentduringthe Rooseveltadministration when the ET presence became enmeshed within the foreign policycrisis of theSecondWorldWar,and waseffectively controlledbyacomplex

74

ofscientific-militaryinstitutionssetupunderexecutiveoversighttoconductthewar effort.

The secondphasewas an effort by theTrumanadministra-tion in thepost-wareratoestablisha frameworkfor politicallymanaging theETpresence througha series of adhoc committees responsible for setting policy and coordinating response by thescientific-military-intelligencecommunities.

ThethirdphasewasacomprehensiveeffortbytheEisenhoweradministrationtomanage the ET presence through improved policy coordination between differentclandestineorganizationsembeddedwithinmilitary/intelligenceandnationalsecuritybranchesofgovernment,and introducingmoreprominentroles for Corporate Americaandforeignpolicy elitesinthepolitical managementoftheETpresence.

The fourth phase was the effective loss of direc tPresidential/Executive oversight during the latter part of the Eisenhower administration and the Kennedyadministration,andthe independence of clandestine organizations created todealwiththeETpresence.

Evidencesuggeststhattherecentmilitary campaign in Iraqmarksa disturbing fifthphase in the political management of the ET presence in which clandestineorganizationseffectivelytakecontrolof a foreigngovernmentfor theexclusivepurposeofmanagingtheETpresence.

For the purpose of this chapter, ‘political management’ will be defined as acoordinatedseriesof policiesfor dealingwitha setof issues that have importantpublicpolicy implications.Inthecase ofpolitical managementoftheETpresence,thisreferstotheneedfordevelopingacoordinatedandstrategicapproachtotheETpresencethatsatisfactorilydealswithallitspublicpolicy dimensions.

Moreimportant,politicalmanagementof theETpresenceinvolves coordinatingthevarious agendas, reverse engineering programs, covert military operations, intelligence gathering operations, and policy studies undertaken by a variety ofclandestineorganizationsembeddedwithin themilitary, intelli-genceandnationalsecuritybranchesofgovernment.

Chief among the clandestine organizations to be identified as taking the lead inpoliticallymanagingtheETpresencein

75

the USis“Majestic12”(MJ-12—aka“PI-40”and“SpecialStudies Group”), embeddedwithin theCovert Operations Committee of the NationalSecurity Council.119 Prominence of Nelson Rockefeller and Dr. Henry Kissinger ininfluencingthisclandestineorganization,andsupportingrolesgiventoCorporateAmerica and elite policy study groups such as the Council on Foreign Relations, giveimportantinsightintohowthe politicalmanagementof theUFO presencehasbeenhis-torically conducted. This casts considerable light on motivations for the recent militaryinterventioninIraq,andthelikelihoodthatitmarks an importantwatershedinthepoliticalmanagementof theETpresence.

Inthischapter,Iwill identifythe politicalmanagementapproachtakeninthevariousphasesofUSadministrative/clan-destineorganizationalresponsetotheETpresence. Iwill analyze the gradual erosion of executive oversight of these clandestineorganizations, and the latter’s increasing influence over the executive branch ofgovernment.Iwillalso outlinetheincreasedroleofCorporateAmericaandtheCouncilonForeignRelationsinpolitically managingtheETpresence.

I furtherexamine the mostcurrent politicalmanagementstyle as evidenced by theUS-led military intervention into Iraqand what this suggests concerning theway ETpresence will be managed in the future. I conclude by identifying how politicalmanagement of theETpresence has beenconducted in a manner that represents athreattotheprinciplesofdemocracyandliberty intheUS.PhaseOne-CrisisManagementoftheExtraterrestrialPresenceEvidencefor the emergence of ETpilotedcraftoverUS skieshasbeen claimed to existfrom as early as the19thcentury.120The emergence of the ET presence as a phenomenon tha trequired politicalmanagementcan bedatedtothefirstinstanceinwhichUSpolicymakershadto grapplewithirrefutableevidenceofanETpresenceanditstremendouspolicyimplications.

76

Evidencefrom whistleblowertestimoniesfrom clandestine

governmentorganizationspointstothecrash of an ETcraft off thecoastof Californiain 1941. Its secret retrieval was what initially set off efforts by the RooseveltadministrationtopoliticallymanagetheETpresence.121Furthermore, in 1942therewasanaval bombardment in response towhat at first was perceived to be a Japanese airraid, butuponcloserevidencesuggestedwas an intelligentlypilotedUFO.122

USparticipation in theSecondWorld War from 1942 meant that these astonishingeventsinvolvingET pilotedspacecrafthad tobepolitically managedinthecontextof aglobal military conflict requiring coordinated policy responses for the sake of USsurvival.

TheapproachtakenbytheRooseveltadministrationwasbasedon maintainingtightsecrecy,given the assumption that the “enemy”—Japan and NaziGermany—would takeanyadvantageofthe ET presenceitcoulddiscoverthroughitsintelligenceassets,to bring about defeat of US forces on the battlefield. The Roosevelt administrationdelegated control of the ET presence to the US Department of War (renamed theDepartment of Defense)whowere immediately aware of themilitary significance ofsuchadevelopment. Any technology andknowledge acquired from the ET presencewouldbeusedtodevelopweaponstechnologythat couldbring victoryon thebattlefield.

Witness testimonies provided considerable evidence that the US Navy led thisclandestine military effort with a top secret project seeking to develop “stealthtechnologies” forNavy ships from as early as 1943.123 Dubbed the “PhiladelphiaExperiment,” this project established the primacy of the US Navy in reverseengineering ET technology, and subordination of the whole ET issue within militaryinstitutions.

An important characteristic of thisphase of the politicalmanagement of the ETpresencewas the leadingroleplayedbymilitaryfundedscientificlaboratories suchasLos AlamosNationalLaboratoryinNew Mexico. Thesewould play thecrit-ical roleofreverseengineeringETtechnology.This “military-scientificcomplex”wascriticaltothewareffortandforrespondingtotheETpresence.

77

As Commander-in-Chiefin awartimesituation,President

Roosevelt’s politicalmanagement of theETpresence was syn-onymouswith politicalmanagement of the Manhattan Project that produced the first atomic bombs andothersecretweaponstechnologiesthatwere partof the wareffort.Bothsecrecyandaclear chain of command were required, and no effort would be spared to fund LosAlamos andotherscientificlaboratoriesworking directly underthemilitarytoutilize thisET“presence”forbattlefieldsuccess.

There isno evidence that the Roosevelt administration developed any specialorganizational structures for dealing with the ET presence, other than simplysubordinatingthewholeETissuetotheDepartmentofWar thatwas conductingthewareffort. As Commander-in-Chief, Roosevelt and his most senior advisors would beextensively informed. They played a key role in exercising the necessary executivesupervision of military projects using technology and intelligence gained from ETsources.

Most important, the Second World War meant there would be no congressionaloverseeing of the ET presence, since the latter’s existence and military significancerequiredutmostsecrecyduetodirenationalsecurityimplicationsit hadfor theWar effort.TheseETrelatedprojectsfell intothecategoryofwhat is todaycalleda “SpecialAccessProgram”(SAP).

SAPsareprogramsthathaveadditionalsecuritymeasuresattachedtothemover andabovethenormalclassificatorysys-tem (confidential,secret,top-secret)attachedtomostclassified information and programs. These SAPs are divided into two classes:“acknowledged” and “unacknowledged,” and a further distinction is made forwaivedSAPsinwhichnormalCongressionaloverseeingdoesnot occur.

Essentially,a waivedunacknowledged SAP (deepblack) is so sensitive, only eightmembers of Congress (the chairs and ranking members of the four defense orintelligencecommit-teesdividedbetweentheHouseofRepresentatives andSenate)arenotifiedof a waivedSAPwithoutbeinggivenany information about it.Thiswouldenablethemto truthfullydeclare noknowledgeofsuchaprogramif asked, therebymaintainingsecrecyof this SAP.

78

IfunacknowledgedSAPsare“blackprograms,”then

“waived” unacknowledged SAPs are “deep black.” ET related programs fall into the“deepblack”secrecycategory.PhaseTwo-The TrumanAdministrationandtheDecisiontoMaintainSecrecyWhenHarry TrumanbecamePresidentin 1945,a “successful”outcomeofthe SecondWorldWarwasalready clear.Thismeant thatamore organized institutional structurecouldbedevelopedforpolitically managingtheETpresence.

The nationalsecurity threattotheUSwas now over as farasthe generalpublicwasconcerned, whichmeantthere wouldsoonbepressurefor Congressionalsupervisionandpublicdis-closure of the clandestine programs conducted by military and intelligencebranchesofgovernment.Since theUSmilitaryexer-cisedcomplete operational andlogisticalcontroloverallaspectsoftheETpresenceduringtheemergencyconditionsofthewar, thereneeded tobea process for decidinghow topolitically manage extensivepolicy implicationsofsuch apresence.

Undoubtedly, thefirstpolicy issue tobeconfrontedwas theextent towhich theETpresenceshouldbedisclosedtoCongressandthe generalpublic.More important,aninstitu-tionneeded to be created forensuringpolicycoordinationbetweenthe differentmilitary andintelligenceunitsthatwereworkingondifferent operationalaspects of theET presence; and, critically, a means of ensuring that the President and his principaladvisorswouldbesufficiently well informedtomain-tainexecutiveoversightoftheentiremilitary-scientific-intelligencecommunitythatinterfacedwith theETpresence.

In 1947,Trumangaveexecutiveapprovalin the form of amemoto thenSecretaryof Defense,JamesForrestal,for thecreationof a clandestinecommitteetobe formedthatwouldplaythese three crucialrolesofpoliticallymanagingpublicdisclosure of theET presence; policy coordination of the various projects associated with the ETpresence;andexecutivesupervisionofclandestineorganizationsdealingwiththe ETpresence.124

79

TitledMajestic12(MJ-12), thisgroupwasclaimedto ini-

tiallyinclude12 seniorindividualsfrom themilitary, intelligenceandcivilian sectorswhoformedan adhoccommittee.MJ-12was thereforeaclandestinepolitical entity createdtopoliticallymanage all aspects of the ET presence in order to provide the best policyadviceto the President.Significantly,MJ-12wasembedded withinthe NationalSecurityCouncil whichwasformedat the same time, for the purpose of coordinating pol- icyrecommendationsfromdifferent government, military and intelligence departments intoa coherentsetof policyrecom-mendationsfrom which Presidentscouldchoose.

Thewayinwhichpolicyadvice would be gained was througha series of adhoccommitteesthat would beformed to investigate specificaspects of the ET presence. One of themorefamous was an adhoc committee including Albert Einstein andRobert Oppenheimer, who released a top secret report on “Relationships withInhabitants of Celestial Bodies” in June 1947, that outlined a number ofrecommendations for responding to theETpresence in termsof their foreignpolicyimplications.125

Thus,executivesupervisionofthe ET presenceoccurredthroughthePresident,hisadvisorsandappointedofficials whowouldsteerUS policyon the critical policy issuesconcerningtheETpresenceon thebasisof policy advicegainedfrom topsecretad hoccommittees.

A factorthatincreasinglyimpactedonthe politicalman-agementof theETpresencewas the rise in publicsightingsofUFO craft in the post-war period, making it moredifficult tomaintain a public policy of secrecy. In 1947, there was an extraordinaryincreaseinthenumberof public sightingsofUFOcraft that led toa groundswell ofsupportofanofficialresponse,andpublicdisclosureof theETpresence.126

Themostfamousof thesewasthe 1947Roswell incidentthathasspawnednumerousbooksandtestimoniesfrom vari-ousindividualsandofficials.127This ledto the decisionof theAir force to launchanofficial publicexamination of the UFOpresence. ProjectBlue Book began in 1952 and was the official public successor to earlier Air forceinvestigationsofUFOsfrom1947–48(Project Sign), and1948–52(Project Grudge).128

80

Inthemidst of theclamor generatedbythepublic fornews

on theUFO presence, theTruman administration was evidently advised by the MJ-12committee to maintain strict secrecy of the ET presence, while continuing to exerciseexecutive supervision of clandestine projects concerning ET activity and theirtechnology. Evidenceof the natureof the executivecontrolof the ET presence and thedecision by MJ-12 to maintain public secrecy can be found in the circumstancessurrounding the dis- missal and death of James Forrestal as Truman’s Secretary ofDefense in 1949. Secretary Forrestal had, according to whistleblower testimonies,developed a clear differenceof opiniononhow the ET presence should be politicallymanaged,andwassaid tohavefavoredpublicdisclosure.129

Forrestal, who was a member of theMJ-12 committee, was thwarted by PresidentTruman, hisprincipaladvisorsand otherson theMJ-12 committee,who decidedthatthewhole ET presence had to be politically managed in a way that maintained strictsecrecy,therebydenyingthegeneralpublic and Congressthe truthabouttheETpresence.Forrestalwas dismissedduetowhat was officiallyclaimedtobea“nervousbreakdown”and later “committed suicide” from the 6th floor of the Bethesda Naval Hospital.130 Accordingtoseveral military“whistleblowers,”Forrestalwasmurdered.131

Testimoniesbyformerofficialssupportthe viewthatanon-disclosure policyoftheET presence was in place and public officials that released classified informationconcerning ETs/UFOswere liable to severe penalties. According to JohnMaynard, aformer military intelligence analyst with theDefenseIntelligence Agency, officialsweresilencedby threatsofseverepenaltiesfordisclosure:

It was during that time[1970s] that I realized just howmuch thegovernment washiding underitsclassificationanddisclosure blanket.Evennewspaperreportsthathad becomepart ofthe[UFO]filewerebeingclassified.Itappearedtome that theyliterallydid not want anyonetoknow what theyknew. I guesscuriosity gotthebestofme atthatpoint.After thatincident,I startedtopayseriousattentionto whatwasgoingon,particularly

81

when it came to the classification ofdocuments.I,moreor less, becamean officialsource toask aboutclassifyingdocuments, whichmeantfullresearchofthedocumentssurroundingtheonebeingclassified.

They say thathindsighthas20/20vision. Icouldhave turned illegalat thatpointandmadecopiesofthepagespertainingtoUFO incidents.However,my secu-rityoathanddutyto countrystopped mefromgoing thatextra measureto the illegal. Ihave totellyou Iseri-ouslythoughtaboutit;however,Icould not cometothepointof making copies of any particular pages relating to UFO sightings and otherencounters.IguessIwastoomuchofaBoyScoutandIdetestedthethoughtofgoingto prison.Ah, yup,Iamabigchickenwhenitcomestothat.132

In conclusion, the political management of the ET presence by the Truman

administrationwas oneof firmexecutivesuper-visionwherebyhe would beadvisedbyhis appointed committees such as MJ-12 in how to deal with the ET presence.Congressionalleaders,atbest,wouldonlybeverballyinformedof theexistenceofETrelated projects,butgivennospecificdetailsasoccursintheproceduredeveloped forwaivedSpecialAccessPrograms(deepblack).

MJ-12wouldprovidepolicyrecommendationsfor coordi-nationandsupervisionofclandestineorganizationsembeddedinmilitaryandintelligencedepartments,andthemilitary funded scientific laboratories that pursued reverse-engineering programs andcommunicationwithETs.PhaseThree-TheErosionof ExecutiveOversightofClandestineOrganizationsThe election of Dwight Eisenhower in 1952, brought with it not only a Republicanadministration,butalsoaprofoundpolicyshift inhow political managementof theETpresencewould beconducted—theformal involvementofCorporateAmerica and

82

the Council on Foreign Relations. TheRockefellerfamily hadsupported Eisenhower in his Presidential campaign and it was therefore no greatsurprisethathe choseNelsonRockefellertobeinchargeof reorganizingthegovernment.

From 1953–59,RockefellerwasChairmanofthePresident’s“AdvisoryCommitteeonGovernmentOrganization.”In addi-tion,hebecamethePresident’s SpecialAssistantinCold War Strategy (1954–55) and was critical in shaping Eisenhower’s views andresponsestotheETpresence.

TheRockefellerfamilyderivedmuchofitswealthandinflu-encefromtheStandardOil Company founded by JohnRockefeller. Standard Oil established a powerfulmonopoly in the US oil industry whose legacy continues today under theExxon/Mobil/Chevronbanners.133

NelsonRockefeller,thegrandsonofJohnRockefeller,was a“moderate Republican”who was a liberal inpolitical issues andstronglysupported the liberal internationalistideaof a globalpolitical institution,but conservativeintheeconomicsphere.134In askingNelsonRockefeller to advisehim andreorganize thegovernment ingeneraland the policy making infrastructure concerning the ET presence in particular,Eisenhower wasgiving CorporateAmerica a prominent role in theway inwhich thegovernment attempted to address policy issues—a view consistent with theideologicalunderpinningoftheUSRepublicanparty.

AsfarastheETquestionwasconcerned,thismeantCorporateAmerica would playa prominentrole intheclandes-tineeffortstoreverseengineerETtechnology.135 Theimmedi-ate consequence was that the scientific laboratories directly funded by theDepartment of Defense in the pastwere reor- ganized in terms of their location andfundingbase.These lab-oratories nowreceived corporate funding through contractsawarded bymilitaryorganizations,ratherthanbeingdirectlyfundedbythe military,aswasthe caseduringthe SecondWorld War andtheTrumanadministration.

IncludingCorporate America provided the important ben- efit of introducing afurtherlayerof secrecythatcouldeffec-tively keepprying Congressmenaway from thetruth abouttheETpresence.The Congressionalsupervision,intheoryatleast,

83

possiblefor government/military fundedscientificlaboratoriesworking on reverse engineering ET technology, would not also be possible forcorporations nominally in charge of the scientific laboratories working on the sameclandestinemilitary projects,usingthesamepersonnel,resourcesandfunding.

With Project Blue book underway and Congress attempting to discoverwhat wasreally happeningconcerningtheETpres-ence,athoroughre-organizationinvolvingaprominentroleforCorporateAmerica,inRockefeller’sview,wasneeded ifsecrecywasto be maintained. The “sleight of hand” involving Corporate America provided animportant means for politically managing the ET presence—total secrecy could bemaintained by simply invoking the mantra of private sector market forces, therebyensuringimmunityfrom congressionalinvestigation.

The full extent of the budget and chief contracting companies of the “military-industrialcomplex,”accordingtoPhilSchneider,who was aCivilEngineercontractedtoworkon theconstructionof undergroundfacilitieswasclaimedto be thefollowing:

The black budgetisroughly $1.3 trillionevery two years.A trillion is a thousandbillion.Atrillion dollarsweighs11tons.TheU.S.Congressneverseesthebooksinvolved withthis clandestinepotof gold. Contractors o fstealth programs: EG&G, Westinghouse, McDonnellDouglas, Morrison-Knudson, Wackenhut SecuritySystems, Boeing Aerospace, Lorimar Aerospace,Aerospacial in France,Mitsubishi Industries,Rider Trucks,Bechtel,*I.G.Farben*,plus a hostof hundredsmore.136

ConfirmationofSchneider’salarmingestimatescomesfromCatherineFitts,aformer

AssistantSecretary in Housing andUrbanDevelopment whohasprovided extensiveinformationontr illionsofUSdollarsbeingsiphonedthroughtheDepartmentofDefenseand DepartmentofHousingand UrbanDevelopmentthatfind theirway into theblack budget opera- tionsof the military-industrialcomplex.137 Fitts estimated that theblack budgetfor thefiscalyears 1998–2000was 1.1 trilliondollars.

84

AnotherimportantpolicyshiftbyRockefellerwasthe

inclusionof theCouncilon ForeignRelationsas thesourceforsuitablerecruitsfor a topsecretpolicy committeewhoseexclu-sive taskwas toprovidepolicyrecommendationsfor thevari-ouspolitical,economic,social,religiousandlegalissuesconcerningtheET presence. The Rockefeller Family became important benefactors in theestablishmentof theCouncilonForeignRelationsin 1921bymakingsignificantyearlydona- tions of $1,500; making a large donation of $50,000 for the Council’s newheadquarters in 1929; anddonating thebuilding thatbecame theheadquarters of theCouncil in1945.138

Ameasure of theRockefellerinfluencecouldbe seenintheirsupportfor individualswhowere appointed to powerful positions. In the early 1970s, for example, DavidRockefeller,who eventuallybecameChairmanof theCouncil,wentagainstthe wishesofanominatingcommitteeto appointWilliamBundytotheeditorshipoftheinfluentialjournal, ForeignAffairs.139 By bringing the Council on ForeignRelations to the centerstage of how the Eisenhower administration would gain recruits for clandestineorganizations designed to make policy recommendations concerning the ETpresence, NelsonRockefeller had maneuvered himself and his family into a keypositionfordetermininghow theETpresencewouldbepoliti-callymanaged.

Themostsignificantinstitutionalreorganization as faraspoliticalmanagement ofthe ET presence was concerned was the expanding and formalizing of MJ-12 as anautonomousinstitutionfully authorizedbyexecutiveorderto deliberateuponandmakepolicydecisionsconcerningtheETpresence.MJ-12becameformally embedded in theCovert Operations Committee of the National Security Council—Committee 5412,namedafterNationalSecurityCouncilEdict5412.MJ-12’searlier existenceas an adhoc committee appointed by executive authority, was now transformed into apermanent sub-committee institutionallyembedded within the most secret of all theNationalSecurityCouncil’scommittees.

Evidence from whistleblower testimonies suggests that Truman’s ad hoccommittee,MJ-12,wasreorganized to becomprisedof two layers.140 The outermostlayerwas agroupof

85

up to 40 individuals who would form aStudy Group(hencethenamesPI-40andSpecialStudiesGroupalsoattributedtoMJ-12) whosefunctionwas toprovidespecialized studiesandpolicy recommendations concerning ET issues for asmaller decision making group (MJ-12) that would actually make official policyrecommendationsforimplementationaftergainingexecutiveapprovalby Eisenhower.

The SpecialStudiesGroup/PI-40formedunderEisenhowerheldtheirfirst meetingsatQuanticoMarineBasein Virginiaand its35membersweredrawn exclusively from theCouncil onForeignRelations.TheStudyGrouphadtwodirectors,HenryKissinger andZbigniew Brzezinski, and consisted of prominent individuals, including Dr. EdwardTeller,Paul Nitze, DavidRockefeller, and McGeorgeBundy (laterKennedy’sSpecialAssistantforForeignAffairs).141 AccordingtoCooper,theRockefellersbuilta lavishretreatforthe StudyGroupinanexclusiveareainMaryland.142

MJ-12 now consisted of 19 individuals who reviewed the various studies, anddeliberated on policy issues concerning the ET presence on the basis of a qualifiedmajoritysystemof12votesbeingnecessaryforanissuetobepassed.143AccordingtoWilliamCooper,whoservedontheNavalIntelligence briefing teamfor the Commander of the Pacific Fleet, the President’s Special Representative forForeign Affairs headed this smaller group, and its composition was deter- minedaccordingtothefollowingformula.

ThePresident’sSpecialRepresentative for Cold WarStrategy (aka National SecurityAdvisor—Nelson Rockefeller); theDirector of Central Intelligence (AllenWelshDulles);Secretaryof State (JohnFosterDulles); Chairmanof the JointChiefsofStaff(AdmiralArthurRadford);Directorofthe FBI(J.EdgarHoover); sixmen from theexecutiveof theCouncil onForeignRelations(“Wise Men”); andsixmenfrom a secretsci- entific organization called the JASON group (led by Dr. Edward Teller) were allmembersoftheCouncil on ForeignRelations.144

Itislikelythatamongthemain organizationalrules govern-ingmembershipof MJ-12/PI-40, all appointments had to be approved byMJ-12; individuals could notbelongto bothMJ-12andPI-40; termlimits appliedtohowlongindividuals

86

couldstay on thepolicy makingbody,MJ-12; andno termlim-itsappliedinthecaseofPI-40.

As with the policy-coordinating role played by the National Security Council inprovidingadviceto the President,MJ-12hadasimilarfunction in coordinating policyconcerningthedifferentclandestineorganizationsinvolvedin variousaspectsof the ETpresence.As the organizationdevelopedto studyspecificpolicyissuesconcerningtheET presence, PI-40 hada significant role in framing policy issues and determiningprioritiesthatwouldinfluencethe wayMJ-12madepolicyrecommendations.

As the architectof the institutionalreorganizationthatledto the expansionofMJ-12,andasthe President’sSpecialAdvisor, Rockefellerassumedthecritical roleofheadofMJ-12.Furthermore,Rockefellerthroughhis family’sconnectionsalsocouldinfluencetheselectionofappointmentsfrom theCouncilonForeignRelationsandtheJASONGroup for PI-40.Accordingly, Rockefeller played a critical role in influencing thestrategicprinciplesandimperativesthatwouldsubsequentlygovernpolicymakingontheET presence. Rockefeller’s influence gradually led to his estrangement withEisenhowerasaresult ofthelatterrealizingthatexecutiveoverseeingoftheETpresencewasbeingerodedduetoRockefeller’sreorganization.

Eisenhower’sconcernresultedfrom two main ways inwhichexecutiveoverseeingwas eroded: therole ofCorporateAmerica, and theway informationwas provided byMJ-12/PI-40indealingwith theETpresence.

The shift from theRoosevelt/Trumanadministrationmodelsof government fundedmilitary-scientificlaboratoriesthatcon-ducted clandestine military projects, to a modelthatmadeUS corporations nominally in charge of these clandestine projects, led to acooperation that Eisenhowerbelievedbecame a threat to executive government. Thiswas immortalized for the general public by Eisenhower’s famous warning in hisJanuary1961, departurespeechofthedangerofthe“military-industrialcomplex”:

InthecouncilsofGovernment,we mustguardagainsttheacquisitionofunwarrantedinfluence,whether

87

sought or unsought by the MilitaryIndustrialComplex.The potentialfor thedisastrousrise ofmisplaced powerexists,andwillpersist.Wemustneverlet theweightofthiscombinationendanger our libertiesordemocraticprocesses. Weshould take nothingfor granted. Only analert and knowledgeablecitizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and militarymachinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security andliberty mayprospertogether.145

At the end of his administration, Eisenhower evidently felt the military-industrial

complex hadgrown too powerful andhad slippedout of his control and that of hisprincipaladvisorsconcerningtheway theETpresence was tobepolitically man-aged.Essentially, clandestine military projects with Corporate America receiving fundingthrough contracts awarded by thedifferentmilitary servicesand intelligence branches,meantthatthePresidentand hisprincipaladvisorshad lost controlofwhatwasoccurringin the clandestine projects and organizations that formed an elaborate “military-industrialcomplex”weaving through thevariousmilitary and intelligence organizationsthat worked on different aspects of the ET presence. Loss of control of what washappeningin military-corporatelaboratoriescar-ried with ita loss of controlof overthequality andaccuracyofthe intelligenceinformationthat found itswayback to thePresidentandhissenioradvisors.

The “military-industrial complex” evidently was able to frame issues andcontingenciesconcerningthe ET presenceinwaysthatdictatedgovernmentpolicytothe extentthatEisenhowerandhis advisorsfelt frustratedandalarmed.Thissuggestedthat theMJ-12 and/orPI-40 had beencompromisedby themilitary-industrial complex,andwasframingpolicyissuesandimperativesinways thaterodedexecutiveoversee-ingof theseclandestineorganizations.

Nelson Rockefeller, the architect of the reorganization that included CorporateAmerica of how the ET presence would be politically managed, resigned from hispositionas thePresident’sSpecialAssistantforGovernmentReorganizationin1959tosuccessfullyrun forNew Yorkgovernor.Rockefeller’sprominent

88

rolein bothCorporateAmericaandinMJ-12/PI-40,however,ensuredthat controlofhow theETpresencewas tobepoliticallymanagedincreasinglylaywith theMJ-12/PI-40 and themilitary-industrialcomplexresponsible for reverseengineering ET technology, and the various intelligence agencies focused on the ETpresence.

WhatEisenhower was alluding to in his departure speechwas that, at least as farpoliticalmanagement of the ET pres-ence was concerned,a political coup hadoccurred.146Eisenhowerhadbeenmaneuveredinto a role thatmerelygaveconstitutional validity topolicyrecommendations that were craftedon information that the President had noindependentmeansofconfirming.ThatEisenhowerfeltthiswayisevi-denced in reportsby Brigadier-GeneralStephenLovekin, oneof themilitary officerswhodirectlyservedunderEisenhower.Lovekinwrote:

But what happenedwas thatEisenhowergotsoldout.Withouthimknowingithelostcontrolofwhatwasgoingonwiththeentire UFOsituation. Inhis lastaddress tothenationI think hewas tellingus thattheMilitary IndustrialComplexwouldstickyou inthebackif youwere nottotallyvigilant...AndIthinkthathe realizedthatallof a sudden this matter is going into the control of corporations that could verywell acttothedetrimentofthiscountry.Thisfrustration,fromwhatIcan remember,went on formonths.He realizedthat hewas losingcontrolof theUFO subject.Herealizedthatthephenomenonorwhateveritwaswewerefacedwithwas notgoingtobein thebest hands.As far as I canremember,thatwas theexpressionthatwasused,“It isnot goingtobeinthebesthands.”147

The Kennedy administration marked an important milestonein the erosion of

executiveoverseeingofthe ET presence.Kennedywasmadeawareof theETpresencewhen, asayoungSenatorservingonthe ForeignRelationsCommittee,hewasinformedof the ET presence. Like his Republican predecessor, the new Democratic PresidentKennedyfoundthatthepolitical

89

management of the ET presence wasdominatedbytheclandestine military and intelligence organizations in concertwith MJ-12/PI-40. HediscoveredtheyreleasedinformationonETsinawaythatwas biasedtowardsa particularoutcome,themostobvious,theneedfor continuedfundingof theirrespec-tive programs.

If an information “spin” was indeed occurring, and certainly that is what theEisenhowerexperiencesuggests,thentheETpresence wouldpermanently remain inthe category of a national security threat that required strict secrecy, with minimalgovernmentsupervisionandextravagantfundinglevels.InvolvementofCorporateAmerica in fulfilling military contracts meant that executive supervision would notsucceedindiscov-eringthe trueramificationsof theETpresenceandwhatclan-destineorganizationswerereally up to.

Thisproblemofhavingno wayofcheckingandconfirmingtheinformationsuppliedby clandestine organizations that was suspected of being “spun” in a way thatsupported particular outcomes was certainlywhat concerned Eisenhower, and was aproblemthatKennedyalso confronted.

Kennedyandhismosttrustedsenioradvisorsevidentlylaboredhard to reestablishexecutivesupervisionandcontrol,but weresimilarlyfrustratedaswasEisenhowerand histeam of advisors. Kennedy’s Special Assistant on International Affairs (aka NationalSecurityAdvisor),McGeorge Bundy,andothercabinetmembersfrom theDepartmentsofDefenseandState, the Directorof Central Intelligence and the Chairman of the JointChiefsof Staff were most likely members of MJ-12,but this did not apparently assistKennedyingainingthechangeshe required.

Accordingto a formersteward aboard Air ForceOne,BillHolden,he andKennedyhadthefollowing conversationwhenflying to Europein the summerof 1963:“Whatdoyou thinkabout UFOs,Mr. President?” Kennedy became seriousforamoment, andreplied,“I’dliketotell thepublicabouttheUFOsituation. . . butmy handsare tied.”148Rockefeller’sinstitu-tional reformsmadeit impossibleforoneindividual,evena sit-tingPresident,to takecontrolofthe policymakingprocessconcerningtheETpresence.

90

Kennedy’seffortstoreestablishexecutivecontroland

overturnthedisturbingrealitythat themilitary-industrialcomplexwas actingwith minimalexecutivesupervisionin dealingwiththeETpresenceand,more important,influencinghow theETpresencewas tobepolitically managed,certainly led toan esca-latingseriesof confrontations. For example, Kennedy’s initiative to improve relations with theSovietUnionunderNikitaKhrushchevandcooperate morein responding to theETpresencecertainlydisturbedthoseclandestineorganizationsthatheldrealinfluenceinhowto politicallymanagethe ETpresence.

Documents have been found supporting the idea thatKennedy desired greatercooperation withthe SovietUnion,and that this was opposedby themilitary-industrialcomplex.149Furthermore, it has been claimed thatKennedy issuedan ulti-matumtoMJ-12, that “heintended to reveal the presence of aliens to theAmerican peoplewithin the followingyear [1964],andordereda plan developedtoimplementhisdecision.”150

The institutionalrestructuringunderRockefellerthatmadeit possiblefor CorporateAmerica to participate in conducting highly classified programs with clandestine organizationsembedded in military andintelligencedepartments,wasnotgoingto beoverturned by an upstart Democratic President committed to a more transparent andcooperativenationalandinternationaleffortto politicallymanagethe ET presence.ItislikelythatKennedy’sassassinationwaspartlylinkedtohis effortsto wrestbackcontroloverhowtomanagetheETpresence.151

Thoseresponsiblecouldhavecomefrom any of the clan-destineorganizationsthatfelt their operations threatened by Kennedy’s policies. An outcome of the crisisinvolvingtheKennedyadministrationwouldhavebeenthattheformalpolicy makinggroup, MJ-12, would have begun making policy choices without necessarily gainingPresidential approval. This marked a departure from the Eisenhower administrationwhere, at least, Eisenhower had to give formal approval for major MJ-12 policyrecommendationstobeimplemented.

Kennedy’s assassination marked the culmination of a process that in allconstituteda“defacto political coup”where

91

executive supervision of the ET presencecametoanendinlessthana decade.Eisenhower’sRepublicanaffiliation andchoiceofRockefeller toreorganizegovernmentstructuresand play a lead-ing role in reforminghow theETpresence wastobepoliticallymanaged,was whateffectivelyledto theerosionof executiveoverseeingof theETpresence.

Eisenhowerbecameaware laterin his administration thathe had lost control,andthat a“silentpolitical coup”wasoccur-ring.Kennedy’sunsuccessfuleffortto reestablishcontrol and his assassination marked a turning point in the erosion of executivesupervision. The kind of executive supervision achieved under the Roosevelt andTrumanadministrationswhere thePresidentandhis senioradvisorswere fullyinformedandexer-cisedfirm controloverthe politicalmanagement ofthe ETpresence wasnow a distantmemory.

Realcontrolover how topoliticallymanagetheETpresencehadslippedinto thehandsof theclandestinemilitary andintel-ligenceorganizationsthatoperated secretly,with noexecutivesupervisionandlavish budgets. It is therefore understandablewhy, at leastfroma bureaucratic perspective if not a national security standpoint, clandestine organizationshadastronginterest inmaintainingthe statusquoandopposingeffortstoyield togreatertransparencyandexecutivesupervision.

As the key policycoordinatingbody,MJ-12/PI-40,wouldcertainlyhavebeen awareof the advantages of such a “de facto political coup” and most likely played asupporting,ifnotprincipal,roleinthe erosionofexecutivesupervisionofallaspectsofthe ET presence. MJ-12/PI-40 was institutionallypositioned to benefitgreatly fromthis loss of executivesuper-vision, which meant thatPresidentialadministrations knewlessaboutwhat was reallyhappeningon ETissues,and would haveto rely onMJ-12/PI-40 for accurate information on what was occurring within the military industrialcomplex.

MJ-12/PI-40couldplay itspolicy coordinatingrole with lit-tle real interferenceorscrutiny from Presidentsandtheir policyadvisorswho simply didnothavethemeansforconfirmingorchallengingthe informationprovidedto thembythe variousclandestineorganizations involved in dealingwith theETpres- ence, and/or the policy adviceprovidedbyMJ-12/PI-40.

92

The inability of Presidentialadministrationstogain independentandaccurateinformationontheETpresencemeantthatMJ-12/PI-40could put itsownspin on theavailableinformationtoproducepolicy outcomesinline withMJ-12/PI-40’sprioritiesandneeds.

Oneof these needs was to ensure a degree of autonomy that minimized executiveinterference in affairs that MJ-12/PI-40probably decided were outside the experienceandabilitiesofPresidentialadministrations,viewing thematbestonly tempo-rary playersin theneed topolitically manage theETpresence.Loss of executive supervisionmeantthatMJ-12/PI-40becamethemain playerin determining how theETpresence was tobepolitically managed.152

This led tothefourthphasein thepolitical management oftheETpresence—The EraofAutonomyandImpunityforClandestineOrganizations.PhaseFour-TheEra ofAutonomyandImpunityfor ClandestineOrganizationsPresidentLyndonJohnson,like Kennedy,wasnottrustedbyMJ-12/PI-40andwassimplydenied information concerning the ET presence.153 MJ-12/PI-40 during the Johnsonadminis-trationoperated withoutexecutivesupervisionandpoliticallymanagedthe ETpresencebycoordinatingamongfourmainconstituencies.

Thefirstincluded thevarious clandestine organizationsembeddedin the differentmilitary services that were part of themilitary-industrial complex involved in reverseengineeringETtechnologyfor weaponsproduction.Thesecondconstituencyincludedtheintelligenceorganizationsthat attemptedtogatherinformationon ETactivities;theETagenda;establishchannelsof communicationwith theETs; andwhich wereembedded inthe Central Intelligence Agency,National SecurityAgency, and the Defense IntelligenceAgency.

The third constituency was the President and his senior advisorswho, while notfullyawareof thescopeof theETpres-ence,wereat leastawareof theexistenceof theseclandestine

93

organizations and of the policy-coordinatingroleplayedbyMJ-12/PI-40.154 ThefourthandlastconstituencywasCongressandthe generalpublicwhowere mostoutoftheinformationloop,andsimplyunaware ofthe extentoftheclandestineprogramssetuptodealwith theETpresence. Atbest,Congressional leaders were verbally informed o f“waived” Special Access Programs that werefocusedon theETpresence.Itislikely,however,thateventhisperfunctorygesturewasnotalways followedinordertohidethetruecostandextentof programsdealingwith theETpresence.

The Airforce investigationbegunattheendof theTrumanadministration, ProjectBlueBook,had been, according toCol. PhillipCorso,who served in theEisenhoweradministration and was also briefly the head of a secret Pentagon project to reverseengineerETtechnology,“purepublic relationsfrom thestart,”thatwas designedtokeepthegeneralpublicfocusedondebatingwhetheror notthere wassufficientevidencefortheexistenceofETpilotedUFOs.155

Termination of Project Blue Book in 1969 represented the confidence of thosepolitically managingtheETpresencethatnumerousUFOsightings andpublic reportsofcontactwithETsno longerrepresenteda threattotheofficialpolicy of non-disclosureof theETpresence.

In its role as the key policy coordinating body in the web of clandestineorganizationsthatdealtwith theETpresence,MJ-12/PI-40now assumedfirmcontroloverhow theETpresencewas tobepolitically managed.Identifyingthechief functionofMJ-12/PI-40andits key playersis therefore centralto under-standing howthe erosion ofexecutivesupervisionof the ETpresence and theautonomy ofMJ-12/PI-40 wouldimpactfuturePresidentialadministrations.

Organizationalfunctionof MJ-12/PI-40canbe likenedtothatof a chessplayerwhohasto managea wholerangeofpieceswith differentfunctions,values andstrengths inordertoachieveanultimategoal—victory.ThismeantMJ-12/PI-40’sprimaryrolewasthat ofdeveloping agrand strategy todealwith the ET presence in terms of thevariety of ET races, their varying agendas and activities, and foreign nationalgovernmentsandclandestinegovernmentson onesideof the

94

chess board (the opponent); and on theotherside,the fourdifferentconstituenciesthatmadeupthepiecesof one’sownsideof thechessboard.

Architect of this strategic role for MJ-12/PI-40 was Nelson Rockefeller, and theCouncilonForeign Relationsessentiallydesigned the institutional rulesbywhichMJ-12/PI-40 would interactwith otherconstituencies involved in various aspects of the ETpresence.There is strongevidencefrom whistleblowersourcesthatthemasterstrategistof theSpecialStudiesGroupthatmadeupthe outerlayerof MJ-12/PI-40,wasDr. HenryKissinger, akeyRockefellerprotégé,whoseexperienceinman-agingthe ET presencewentfurtherbackthanis commonlyappreciated.156The ProminenceofHenryKissingeras PI-40’sMasterStrategistThere is significant evidence that Nazi Germany had partially succeeded in reverseengineeringdownedextraterrestrialcraftthathadbeendiscoveredby Nazi authoritiesinthemid 1930s[thiswillbeexaminedmoreclosely inChapterThree].157Partlysuccessfuleffortsby topNazi scientists in understanding andreverseengineering this ET technology was amajor factor in Nazi Germany’s advanced weapons technology program andprolongationofthewareffort inordertofullydeploythesenewweaponssystems.

At the conclusion of the Second WorldWar, a top secret effort to repatriate thesameNazi scientistsin orderto utilizetheirexpertisewasbegun by USArmy’sCounterIntelligenceCorps.“OperationPaperclip,” as this secret effortwas called, involved theremoval of hundreds of Nazi scientists to the well- funded military-scientificlaboratoriescreatedtoproduceweaponsforthewareffort.158Alittleknownfigurein“OperationPaperclip”was a youngGerman-speaking USArmyintelligence officerwith a GermanJewishbackground—HenryKissinger.

Kissinger was born inFuerth,Germanyon May27, 1923, andserved in the ArmyCounterintelligenceCorpsfrom1943–46.

95

Atthe closeofWorldWarII, hestayedonactivedutyinoccupied WestGermany. Hewasassigned to the970thCounter Intelligence CorpsDetachment, among whose “official” functions included the recruitment of ex-Naziintelligenceofficersforanti-Sovietoperationsinsidethe Sovietbloc.159Kissinger’sdetachment,inreality,wasplayingakeyrole in“Operation Paperclip”—arole thatwouldmark him outinmil-itary intelligencecircles as someonewho had thekeen intellect and strategic thinking abilities that could handle the most importantstrategicpolicyissuefacingthe US—howbest torespondtotheETpresence.160

Kissinger returned totheUS,and in 1947 began his university education as anundergraduate at Harvard University. Kissinger, however, retained his ties to themilitary, as a Captain in the Military Intelligence Reserves. This enabled him to con-tinue toplay a role in issues pertaining to theETpresence during the time that thepolicy atthehighestlevel of theTrumanadministrationwas beingdeveloped.

By 1950,Kissingerwasnowagraduate studentandwasworking part time for theDepartmentofDefense.He regularlycommutedtoWashington—asa consultantto itsOperationsResearchOffice, which was under the direct control of the Joint Chiefs ofStaff.TheOperationsResearchOffice “officially”con-ductedhighly classifiedstudiesonsuch topicsas theutilizationof formerGermanoperativesandNazi partisansupportersinCIAclandestineactivities.

Kissinger’sofficial dutieswere onceagainacoverfor hisrole in coordinatingtherecruitmentandutilizationof formerNaziscientistsinclandestineprojectsinvolvingthereverseengineeringof ET technology,behaviormodificationprojects(mindcontrol),anddealingwitharangeofintelligenceandstrategicissuessurroundingtheETpresence.

InI952, aftercompletinghisPhD,Kissinger becamea con-sultantto thedirectorofthePsychologicalStrategyBoard, anoperatingarm of theNationalSecurityCouncil forcovertpsy-chologicalandparamilitaryoperations.Thus,Kissinger’sroleexpanded todealingwith theextensivepolicy issuessurround-ing theETpresence.Kissinger’s insideknowledgeofOperationPaperclipandthe ET presence,combinedwithhisstrategic

96

thinkingabilities,markedhim as someonewhowouldrapidlyassumea prominentpositionin thedecisionmakinghierarchysurroundingtheETpresence.

AsamemberoftheCouncil on ForeignRelations,Kissingerwouldundoubtedlyhavecometo the attentionofitsmostprominentmembers as someone who could provideleadershipon how torespondtotheETpresence.

In1954, President Eisenhower appointedNelsonRockefeller his Special Assistant for Cold War Planning, a position thatofficially involvedthe “monitoringandapprovalofcovertCIAoperations.”Thiswas acover for Rockefeller’s trueroleas head of MJ-12;andmost important, directing USfor-eignpolicy inthewake ofa “secrettreaty”signedbetweenanETrace from or nearthe Orion Constellation and the US.161 The “treaty” has been a source of muchspeculation but its exis- tenceandcontent havebeen revealed by a number of formermilitary andgovernmentintelligence“whistleblowers.”162

In 1955, Kissinger became a consultant to the National Security Council’sOperations Coordinating Board—the highest policy-making board for implementingclandestineoperationsagainstforeigngovernments.Kissinger’sanalyticalandstrate-gicskillswereusednot only forcoordinatingUSpolicy inclan-destineoperationsagainstforeign governments, but also for the clandestine operations against ET races.163 Kissinger’s role in the clandestine operations, his close relationship with NelsonRockefeller, his intellectual abilities, all combined to lead to a steady increase in hisinfluence.

Rockefellerandothersrunningclandestineorganizationsunderstoodthedangerinnotcoordinatingclandestinepolicy towardsET racesandreverseengineering, with themorecon-ventionalforeignpolicyissuesthatwere the focusofpublicattention.

Addressingthe extensiverangeofissuesandproblemswouldrequire someonewiththe strategic thinking abilities to coordinate these two arenas. Rockefeller, theExecutiveCommittee of the Council on Foreign Relations, andmilitary intelligence,chose Kissinger as the person best qualified for this critical role. Rockefeller wasinstrumental in appointingKissinger as one of the two Directors of PI-40, the StudyGroup

97

thatwouldprovidepolicyadvicetoMJ-12inresponsetotheTreaty signedwith theETrace fromOrion inparticular,andtheETpresenceingeneral.164

As a Director and key strategist of PI-40, Kissinger would certainly have beenawareoftheneedtopoliticallymanagetheET presencethroughensuringthe autonomyof MJ-12 and PI-40 and to render efforts of executive supervision ineffective. Moreimportant,MJ-12/PI-40had steadilygrown ininstitutionalauthorityandpowertotheextentthat it could now exert political influence over the executive branch of government.StronginfluenceifnotoutrightcontrolofsuccessivePresidentialadministrationswasviewed to be a critical part of how the ET presence had to be politically managed;effectively dismantlingtheexecutivesupervisionthatwas such a prominentfeatureoftheRooseveltandTrumanadministrations.

What contributed to this need for MJ-12 to control/influence futureadministrationsisthe ironythatalthoughmostnationalsecurityofficials, politicians,thenews media and the public believed the Soviet Union was the primary threat to USSecurity,in factthe US wassecretlycooperating extensivelywith the SovietUnion inrespondingto theETpresence.Thismeantthatbeneath the official ColdWar rhetoricand armed conflicts that consumed public attention and resources, clan- destinecooperationwas occurringagainstwhat was perceivedtobea commonthreat.165

In short,the US andUSSRwere strategicalliesasfar asaddressingtheETpresencewasconcerned, while simultane-ouslybeingstrategiccompetitorsinthe geo-politics oftheColdWar. This meantthatmuchof theanimositythatcharac-terizedtheCold Warwas a charade that helped divert the general public away from what was reallyhappening. Such a charade could only work if the most senior officials within thePresidentialadministrationwere familiar with theETpresence,inorder toneutralize morebellicosepolicymakerswhobelievedtheCold Warwas for real, and who werefullyreadytouse nuclearweaponsagainst theSoviet Union in response toaperceivedattack.

Influencing successive Presidential administrations could be achieved byembeddingkeyPI-40membersinseniorpolicy

98

positions in each administration, therebyensuringnon-disclosureof the ET presenceandmoderating ColdWar hostilities.For theKennedy/Johnson administrations,thisindividualwasMcGeorgeBundy,oneof the originalmembersofPI-40, whouponbecomingNationalSecurity Advisor would havebecomethe chair ofMJ-12.166 In the case of the futureNixon administration, this would be achieved byembedding within it an even more prominent PI-40 member who could controlPresidentNixon whennecessary.

Forthe Nixonadministration,thispersonwouldbe nootherthanHenryKissingerwho was plucked out of public obscurity in 1968 to be appointed National SecurityAdvisor ofPresident-electNixon.TheinstrumentalfigureinKissinger’sappointment was NelsonRockefellerwho hadlost toNixon inthe 1968Republican convention, andsubsequentlyarrangedforhisprotégétobecomepartofNixon’steam.167

Kissinger was intenton centralizingforeignpolicy making in the WhiteHouse andtheNationalSecurityCouncil,therebyensuringhim a centralrole inshapingnotonly USforeignpol-icy,but also clandestinepolicy towardsETracesinhis new roleas DirectorofMJ-12.Given his long history as a Director of the Special Studies Group/PI-40 sinceitsformation,KissingerwouldhavebeenthemostexperiencedandpowerfulheadofMJ-12 sinceNelsonRockefeller.168

In Seymour Hersh’s critical biography of Kissinger’s political managerial styleduringtheVietnam era,what emerges is thatKissingerwas intentonamassing asmuchpower as possible in managing international affairs.169 Kissinger systematicallyunderminedthepositionsofotherswho couldposea threattohis controlofinternationalaffairs, especially that of the new Secretary of State, William Rogers, and other keypolicymakersintheNixon administration.170

Kissinger emerges inHersh’s biography as a political figure paranoid aboutcedingpowertootherswhoinhisview lackedthe subtletyandacumenin dealingwithcritical foreign policy issues. Kissinger’s managerial style was t oensure that allinformationpassedthroughhim as theprincipalfilterforshapingNixon’sprioritiesandthinkingonforeignpolicy.

99

A passage from a former Kissingeraide,MortonHalperin,

revealsKissinger’spoliticalmanagerialstyle:

OnJanuary25, 1969, five daysintotheadministration,theNSC was convenedforits firstmeeting.The issuewas Vietnam,andHalperin,now clearly Kissinger’s topaide, was assigned to summarize all the papers and prepare a coveringmemorandumforthe President.Hecarefully listedthevarious optionsin thetwo-or three-pagesummary, leaving boxesfor thePresident toinitialhischoices. Theidea was to reduce the President’s workload: If Nixon chose not to read theattached documents, he could merely review Halperin’s summary (which, ofcourse,camewithKissinger’simprimatur)andmakehisdecision.Henrylovedthesummary andthought itwas terrific. But, “Mort,” he said, “you haven’t told thePresidentwhat optionswe shouldchoose.”

“I thought to myself,” Halperin recalls, “we’re not supposed to be givingpositions; we’re just supposed to send summaries of the options.” Years later,Halperinwould realize how naïve he had been:“Henry had beenpubliclysayingthatwe were just going to sortout the issues for thePresident. I didn’t know thatHenrywantedto givehimthe decisionsheshouldtake.Iwassur-prised—becauseI still believed whatHenry had said.” The Kissinger summary papers,with theirrecommenda-tions, would becomethemostsecretdocumentsin theNixon WhiteHouse.171

Kissinger’spolitical managerialstyle while ingovernmentisvery significantsince

itprovidesinsightinto how decisionmak-ing in PI-40 was conducted underKissingeras the Study group director, and later in MJ-12 when he become its head during theNixon/Fordadministrations.172

Kissinger’s role in guiding US foreign policy was dictated by his philosophy of“realpolitik.” Realpolitik was modeled after h i sfavorite international statesman, 19thcentury German Chancellor, Otto Von Bismark, who skillfullymanaged internationalalliances

100

and limited warstotransformPrussia/Germanyinto agreatpowerwithoutprovokingan internationalallianceagainstGermany.173

For Bismark, international politics was a grand chess board where morality andsentiment playedatbest a secondary role.What really mattered was the skillful use ofone’s resourcesinachievingone’sstrategicobjectiveofmaximizingpower.174

“Realpolitik” dominated Kissinger’s approach to international politics asevidencedin placessuchas Laos, Cambodia,Chile andEast Timor wheremoralityandsentiment playednorole in these countries’ treatment as pawns. In this grand game ofinternationalchess,theUScompetedwith theSovietUniontomaximize its geo-politicalpower,whilesimultaneouslycoop-eratingstrategicallyinrespondingtotheETpresence.

Littleknown to thegeneral public, however, Kissingeradopted the same role insteeringUS policyin howit wouldrespondtotheETpresence. Morality and sentimentwould playat best asecondary role as the USgradually improved its resources inorder to increaseits strategic position vis-à-vis the ET races visiting Earth. The moralorientation of these ET races that interacted with humanity and the clandestineorganizations that were aware of ET activities were not given great emphasis inKissinger’srealpolitikconcerningtheETpresence.

What matteredwas the extent towhich ET raceswould provide resources for USclandestineorganizationstoimprovetheirweaponstechnologyandthusimprovetheUS’sstrategic position vis-à-vis different ET races.Kissinger’s realpolitik was the way inwhich the complex political, social, economic and envi-ronment issues would bemanagedvis-à-vistheETpresence.

Kissinger’srolewouldbesimilar to his 19thcenturyhero,Bismark. Kissinger wouldplay a key role in transforming theUSinto the dominant globalpower thatcoulddealwith ETracesasanequal,withoutsparkinga damaginginterplanetarywarwith oneormore of the ET races that would spell the end for US sovereignty and freedom.Kissinger’scloseassociationwiththeRockefellerfamily ensured thatCorporateAmericawouldcontinuetoplay a prominentrole inthepoliticalmanagementof theETpresence.

With Kissinger, during the Nixon administration, simultaneously playingprominentrolesinUSforeignpolicyandits

101

clandestine“interplanetarypolicy”throughMJ-12/PI-40,whatemerges is thatthe politicalmanagement of the ET presencewasdominated bya fewindividuals intent onamassing asmuch institutional power as possible, and notdelegatingauthoritytothoseoutsideofMJ-12/PI-40who wereviewedtolackthenecessaryexperience,political sophisticationand intel-lectindealingwiththecomplexitiesoftheETpresence.Eisenhower’swarningthatthepoliticalmanagementof theETpresencewas“notinthebesthands”now appearedprophetic.

Political Impotenceof theCarterandClintonAdministrationsandtheThreatposedbyReaganTheelectionofJimmyCarterin1976,broughtinanewDemocraticPresidentwhohaddeclared thathewouldreveal the truthabout theETpresence once in office. CarterwasthefirstUSPresidentwho was on thepublicrecordas havingwit-nessedaUFO.175

Carter,however,wouldfind thatas President,he wouldbeunabletodeterminethefullextentofUSclandestineprogramsfocusedonthe ET presence,norwouldhehaveanypowerto influencepoliticalmanagementofthe ET presence.Eventhoughhis NationalSecurityAdvisor,ZbigniewBrzezinski wasoneof the first directorsof PI-40 andwouldhavenowtakenover thechair ofMJ-12 fromKissinger, Carterandhisprincipaladvisorsfound theywere simply denied necessary information about the ET presence. Thus,makingitpainfullyclearthatexecutivesupervisionof theETpresencewas non-existent.176

Confirmationforsuch a denialcomesfrom Daniel Sheehan,afamedconstitutional attorneywhoservedasgeneralandco-counselfortheNew YorkTimes inthePentagonPaperscase:

In1977, Iwas contactedby thedirectorof theScienceandTechnologyDivision ofthe Congressional Research Service. She informed me that President Carter hadheldameetingwiththedirectoroftheCIA,GeorgeBush,Sr.,

102

and demanded that he [Bush] turnover tothePresidentthe classified information about UFOs and the information that was in thepossession of the US intelligence community concerning the existence of ETintelligence.This informationwasrefusedto the PresidentoftheUnitedStatesbythe directorofthe CIA.TheDCI[DirectorofCentralIntelligence]suspected thatthepresident waspreparing torevealthisinformationtotheAmericanpublic.177

FurtherconfirmationofCarter’sinability togetinformationon ETs/UFOs camefrom

JohnMaynard:

I’ma retiredintelligenceanalyst. . .was in themilitaryfor 21 yearsandstartedoffwith the Army IntelligenceSecurity Agency as an analyst. I went on towork forsev-eral differentorganizationswith themilitary andendedup with theDIA. . . incharge of . . . the documents for the Requirements and Evaluation division. InEurope,IresearchedtheseUFO reportsand we gotquitea bit ofinformationaboutthesightings...drawingsofwhat thevehicleslookedlike,whethertheylandedornot,whetherthey sawany...extraterrestrials...itmadeforanexcitingcareer.They[thereports]were goingtotheCIA. . . theDIA. . . theAirForceOffice ofSpecial Intelligence . . . But as far as UFO and intelligence and extraterrestrialmatters go, it’s right at the top—and Iwould say that the president has limitedknowledgeofit.Iknow thatCarterdid not have anyknowledgewhat-soever.AndI workedtherewith . . .PresidentCarter’sorganization.178

A project funded by the Carter administration in May 1977 through the Stanford

ResearchInstitute(SRI) toexploreExtraterrestrialCommunication was terminated four months later through Pentagon pressure. The Pentagon simply threatened thedirectorsof the SRIthatit wouldend projects thePentagon fundedfor SRIifthelaterwent aheadwith theWhiteHouseCenter.179

103

After therefusal by theCIAtohandoverET/UFO filesand

the debacle over its Extraterrestrial Communication project, Carter and his senioradvisors[thoseoutsidetheofficial loop]quickly recognizedtheywere“minorplayers”asfar as the ET presence was concerned. Indeed, this lack of ability to politi- callymanageETaffairs may well havebeena critical factorinthe Iranianrevolutionthatdidso muchtoundermineCarter’sreelectionchances.180

The Republicanelectoralcampaignof 1980broughtwith ita newdimension to thepoliticalmanagementof theETpres-ence.RonaldReagancameintothe campaignas acrusading anti-communist with fixed views that only negotiating from a position ofmilitary strengthwas themeansof counteringtheSovietthreattoglobaldemocracy.

Privately, however,Reaganhadasimilarperspectiveon theETpresenceand what heviewedas theneedtonegotiate froma positionof strength vis-à-vis the “ET threat tohumanity.”181Likehispredecessor,PresidentCarter,ReaganhadanencounterwithUFOs.182

Unlike Carter,however,hedevelopeda strongbelief that the ET presence wasathreat to humanity that had to bemilitarilycontained. Incontrast,his opponentin theRepublicanPrimaries, former CIADirector GeorgeBush, brought with him amoremoderateRepublicanideology—onethatwasmore consistentwith theviews of MJ-12/PI-40,of which Bushhadpreviouslybeenamember,andofHenryKissingerwhowas by nowthe undisputed master strategist for MJ-12/ PI-40with nearly 40 yearsexperienceindealingwiththeETpresence.

TheelectionofReaganoverBushwouldcertainlyhavecomeasadisappointmenttoKissinger andMJ-12/PI-40 not only in terms of bringing in another “outsider” whoimpacted the abilityof MJ-12/PI-40 to politicallymanage the ET presence, but alsobecauseitallowedadangerouselementtoemergein theclandestineeffort tomanagethis presence.

MJ-12/PI-40, under Kissinger, was fullyawareof thecomplexities of the ETpresenceintermsofdifferent racesand orientations,and ensuring that interactionwiththenumerousclandestineorganizationsembedded in the differentmilitary

104

organizationsandintelligenceagenciescoordinatedin a waythatmaintaineda “globalbalanceofpower.”

What Kissinger and MJ-12/PI-40 weremost concernedabout was the danger ofclandestineorganizationsin theUSmilitary and/orintelligenceservicesengagingin adangerousconfrontation with ET races thatcoulddegenerate into large-scalehostilitiesleading toa “war of theworlds.”As themaster “Bismarkian” strategist, Kissingerwasconcerned to maintain the “balance of power” while simultaneously advancing thestrategicpositionof theUSvis-à-visETraces.

PI-40, againunder the leadership of Kissinger after having served his full term asheadofMJ-12,was thereforeintentoncontainingany “militaryadventurism”onthe partof clandes-tineorganizationsin theUSmilitary thatwereatbest toocon-frontational,oratworstinfiltratedbyETracesintentoninitiatingglobalconfrontation.183

What most concerned MJ-12/PI-40 was the possibility that a Presidentialadministration could be unduly influenced byclandestine military organizations thateitherwerepronetomil- itary adventurism and/orhadbeen infiltratedby ET races [thistopicwillbeaddressedinChapterFour].

Soonafter his election,Reagandemonstrateda rigid beliefof the nature of the ETthreat, and lacedmanyof his publicstatements referring to theETpresence and itsthreattohumanity.184Accordingto DixonDavis,one ofthe twoCIAagentsappointedtobriefReaganwhen he wasPresident-elect:“Theproblemwith RonaldReaganwas thatallhis ideaswerefixed.Hethoughtthatheknewabouteverything—hewasan old dog.”185

Reagan’santi-communistrhetoricandmassivebuildupofmilitary forceswas a coverfor Reagan’s true desire to militarily confront ET races.186 His first major publiccommenton an ETthreatoccurred ata1985US-SovietSummitmeetingwithMikhailGorbachevatGenevawhenhe said:

I couldn’t helpbut—whenyou stop to think thatwe’reallGod’schildren,whereverwe livein theworld, I couldn’thelpbutsay to him (Gorbachev) just how easyhistaskandminemightbe ifsuddenlythere wasathreat to

105

this world from some other speciesfromanotherplanetoutside in the universe. We’d forget all the little local differences that we havebetweenour countriesandwewouldfindoutonceandfor all thatwereallyare allhumanbeingshereon this Earth together.Well I guesswecanwaitforsome alienraceto comedownandthreaten us, butIthink thatbetweenus we canbringaboutthatrealization.187

If his unscheduled comment at a US-SovietSummitwerenot itself a provocative

enoughexpressionofReagan’sviews onthepossiblethreat of an ETpresence, thenhisspeech to theForty-Second UN GeneralAssemblyof the UnitedNationsonSeptember21,1987, waseven moreprovocativeand disturbinginits implications:

In our obsessionwith antagonismsof themoment,weoften forgethow muchunites all themembers ofhumanity. Perhaps weneed some outside, universalthreattomakeus recognizethis commonbond.Iocca-sionallythinkhowquicklyourdifferences worldwidewould vanish ifwe were facing an alien threat from out-sideof this world.And yet I ask—is notan alienforcealreadyamongus?188

ForColonel Phillip Corsoandother conservative militaryofficers, Reaganwas a

herowho knew how tobestrespond tothe ET presence—aglobaldefensiveshieldthatcould shoot down ET craft anywhere around the planet.189 The Strategic Defense Initiativehadlittle todo with shooting downballisticnuclear missiles, and reallywaspartofaplanetaryshielddesiredbyclandestineorganizationsinthemilitarywhowantedtomilitarilyconfronttheETpresence.

Reagan’sconservativepolitical philosophyand public state-mentson theneedfor amassivemilitarybuild up totheSovietthreatwereallusions totheperceiveddangerofanETinvasion.Reaganandhis political advisorswereconsidered by Kissinger,Brzezinski,andothersinMJ-12/PI-40,as a threatto thepoliti-calmanagement of theETpresenceandtothetenuouspeace

106

that existed between clandestine organizationsaroundtheplanetandETraces.

Given thegravity of Reagan’s fixed views and the implica- tionsformanaging theET presence,it is verylikely groupsresponsivetotheconcernsof PI-40 playeda roleinattemptingtohave Reaganremovedfrom public office and replacedby anMJ-12/PI-40member,George Bush,the VicePresidentandformerheadof theCIA.

The Hinkleyassassinationattemptin1981was possiblyanattempt byorganizationsloosely linkedwith PI-40 to either remove or intimidate Reagan so as to prevent whatcouldhavebeena disastrousunravelingof thecovertglobalcooperationinmanagingtheETpresence.190Accordingtoaresearcherintotheinfamousmindcontrolprogramcalled“ProjectMonarch,”HinkleyalongwithLeeHarveyOswald,SirhanSirhansandTimothyMcVeigh, was subjected to severe mental and physical abuse which made him anunwilling tool ofhisprogrammers.191The eventual result of the assassination attempt was that the Reagan administration’smilitaristic impulses were sufficiently restrained so as to ensure that no militaryconfrontationwithETraceswouldspiral out ofcontrol.

The1988electionofGeorge BushonceagainallowedMJ-12/PI-40todominatethestrategicthinking ofaPresidentialadministration.AsaformermemberofMJ-12/PI-40,Bushwas alltooawareof theneedtopolitically managetheETpres-ence in the moulddictatedbyKissingerduringthe Nixonadministration.

Indeed,Kissinger’s supportwas critical in theappointmentof Bush to become theDirectorof the CIA in 1975,andhis“promotion” toMJ-12 from PI-40, not long aftertheWatergate scandal had begun to subside.192 Public secrecy, monopolizing decisionmakingpower in MJ-12/PI-40, maintaining the bal-ance ofpower, continuing toreverseETtechnologyforweaponsacquisition,andmaintainingthe prominentroleofCorporate America in dealing with the ET presence, were the keys to politicallymanagingtheETpresence.

MJ-12/PI-40was certainlycontent with its influence under theBush administrationand there is evidence that international events were managed in a way that wouldsupportthe1992

107

reelectionof PresidentBush.The “EndoftheColdWar”wascertainlya“gift”totheBushadministrationthatnormallywouldhaveensured a secondelection victory for an administration enjoying such a tremendous foreign policysuccess.193

The successfuloutcome of theGulfWar in1991 was similarly an event thatwouldhave normally secured a successful reelec- tion campaign. The outcome of the 1992Presidential electionappeared so certain,prominent Democrats decided not to run andviewed1996as thebesttime foraPresidentialcampaign.

The election of President Clintonwas certainly a surprise development for MJ-12/PI-40 and once again had the effect of placing an “outsider” in the White House.Clinton, like Carterbeforehim, soonfoundout thathe hadminimal influence over thepoliticalmanagement of theET presence. Even more disturbing, hisseniorpoliticalofficialsincludingthe DirectorofCentralIntelligence,JamesWoolsey,and SecretaryofDefense,WilliamCohen,hadlittleknowledgeofthe ET presence.194StephenGreernarratedthefollowingexchangehe hadwith afamousastronaut:

RecentlyIwasinWashington meeting withaveryfamousastronaut. Everyonewouldknowthisperson’sname.. .This particularastronaut had duringhis careerbeeninpossessionof a very specificpieceof incontro-vertiblepieceof evidencerelated to UFOs. It is something that if disclosed would be clear and definitive.This astronaut described how he had approached and worked directly withPresidentClinton’sSecretaryofDefenseWilliam Cohento look intoandretrievefromclassifiedprojectsthisspecificpieceofevidence—ofthatwhich he hadall thespecific details . . . the words used by this astronaut to me were “there was aninordi-nate largeamountof moneyandpersonal timeby theSecretaryofDefenseWilliamCohenwas spenttolocatethis evidence,andhe was nevergiven access toit.”195

This suggested thatmanyof thosesitting in MJ-12/PI-40,were hangovers fromthe

Bushadministration,andClinton’spoliticalappointmentswere nottrustedto maintainsecrecy.

108

Clinton’seffortstoextractinformationfromclandestineorganizations proved fruitless as evidenced in the following quote from WilliamLaparl,whoworkedwiththe CIA in theearly daysof theClintonAdministration:

Itwasknownamong the highCIA people, and thepeople whohadcontact withthese people, that theClintonswere on the prowlfor UFOs. Bill Clinton had beenasking anyonewho would listen tohim, totell himthe secret. Youknow,hewouldget someAdmiralinthere,and say“Bytheway,tellme theUFOsecret.”Theywouldjustlookathimlike“What planetareyoufrom?”196

Clinton’sinterestandeffortstogaininformationon theETpresenceand clandestine

projectswerea threattoMJ-12/PI-40insofar as Clinton’s initiatives threatenedtheveil ofsecrecythathadexistedsincethe1940s.More important,Clinton’s effortsmay well havebeenviewedas the initial stagesof an attemptto re-establishexecutivesupervision.Itis nottoo difficult tosurmisethatmanyof Clinton’s politicalproblemswerea resultofclandestineefforts todistracttheClinton administration,andensureminimal supportforhisdomesticpolicies.

Clinton becameresignedtoservinghistermwithonlymin-imal knowledgeof theETpresence,andwithouthavinganyseriousimpacton how topoliticallymanagetheETpresence.Hisremarkstoa questionfrom a NorthernIrelandteenagerinNovember1995testifyto hispoliticalimpotenceonthe ETpresence:

I gota letterfrom 13-year-oldRyan from Belfast.Now,Ryan,if you’reoutinthecrowdtonight,here’stheanswertoyour question.No, as far as I know, an alienspacecraftdidnotcrashinRoswell,NewMexico,in1947. (Laughter.) And, Ryan, if the United States Air Force did recover alienbodies,they didn’ttellme aboutit,either,andIwant toknow. (Applause.)197

The electionof GeorgeW.Bush in 2000onceagainled toan insider,or at leastan

insider’s loyal son,tobein theWhite

109

House. George Bush, Sr., wouldhenceforthplay a key roleinsteeringhisson, who lackedthekind ofintellectualqualitiestobea memberof PI-40 orCouncilon ForeignAffairsinhisownright, but servedas a useful figureheadthatcouldgain theloy-alty of theAmericanpublicinways thatthemoreurbaneandsophisticatedGeorgeBush Sr., andNelsonRockefellerbeforehim, nevercould.

This setthestagefor a new phasein thepoliticalmanage-mentof theETpresence:the takeover of a foreign country for purposes exclusively relating to the strategicadvantagethiswouldprovideinpolitically managingtheETpresence.PhaseFive-The Political ManagementofIraq andItsAncientETTechnologyIn the2000 Presidential election campaign, GeorgeBush jokingly responded to aquestion concerning the ET presence by saying it was Richard Cheney’s area ofexpertise.198 Cheneyservedas Secretaryof Defensein the first Bush administrationandaccordingto the formulafirst usedduring theEisenhoweradministration to determinethemembersof MJ-12,Cheneywouldhavebeena formeractivememberof MJ-12,andwasvery likelya currentmemberofPI-40.

Bushwouldhavebeenbriefedat somepointby Cheneyand/orhis fatherabouttheETpresence,andwas simply defer-ring totheclearexpertiseCheneyhadin the area.Otherkey administration figures in the newBush administration such as Donald Rumsfeld,Secretaryof Defenseduring theFordadmin- istration,alsowouldhaveserved onMJ-12according to the Eisenhower era formula, andwould have subsequently sat on PI-40,beforefindinghimself elevatedoncemoretoMJ-12.

OthernewBushadministrationofficialssuchasPaulWolfowitz andRichardPerle,bothof whomhadearlierheldprominentpositionsin theDepartment of Defense,wereprob-ably briefedon theETpresenceduringtheir tenures.

What distinguished this senior group of officials in the Bush administration withbackgrounds in theDepartment of Defensewas their “hawkish”Republicanworldviewthatespousedsuch

110

novel internationaltheoriesas preemptivemilitary interventionagainstroguestates,andcreatingaglobaldefensiveshieldagainstthem.

Although sucha theory ostensibly wasfocused on the threat suchstates posed ifthey possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction, the knowledge these officials hadconcerningtheETpresence,suggested thattheyweremerelycontinuingthethreat basedassessmentof theETpresencethathadearlierdominatedthe Reaganadministration.Theglobal defensive shield against rogue states using ballistic nuclear missilesagainst theUS,was againa convenient cover for thetrue intent to be able tomilitarilyinterveneagainstETcraft anywhereontheplanet.Aside from thecloseties this groupofBush administration “hawks”had with theDepartment of Defense, some of them alsohad extensiveties withcorporatemilitarycontractorsthatworkedon variousclandestineprojectsconcerningtheETpresence.

Theprofessional background and policies of theBush administration “hawks”suggests theyformed the publicheadof a“cabal” of seniormilitary officials based inclandestineorganizations thatpromoted a militaristic response to the ETpresence.199 Such officials would no doubthavebeen awareofclandestine organizations of othercountries withwhomtheycooperated/competed in terms of gainingmaximum strategicadvantagevis-à-visthe ET presence.Theywouldhavealsobeenaware ofthe strategicsignificanceofdifferentroguestatesinthe tenuousbalanceofpowerthatexistedontheplanetbetweendifferentETfactionsandclandestinegovern-mentorganizations.Akeyroguestateinsuch astrategicstrug-gle was Iraq underSaddamHussein.

There is evidence that Iraq once hosted an advanced civilization that interactedextensivelywith ET races.200 The likelihood that this interaction led to thedevelopment o ftechnology either left behind by these ETs or was based on ETtechnology that lay buried in the Iraqi desert, will be argued in Chapter Five as theprimarymotivationfor theUS-led militaryinterventioninthe2003Gulfwar.

OncetheneedtoinvadeIraq emergedfor reasonsthat pri-marily concernedpoliticalmanagementoftheETpresenceand

111

the strategic importance of Iraq, itbecameimportanttodealwith this in a way thatwouldminimizeglobalchaos.This wasespeciallyimportantsinceclandestine organizations in the US were competing with similar organizations inFrance,Germany,Russia and even China that presumablyalreadyhad establishedsomeunderstandingofpreciselywhatwasavailablein Iraq,and itsstrategicsignificancefortheglobalbalanceofpower. 201

The influence of key “hawks” in the Bush administration, Donald Rumsfeld, PaulWolfowitz,RichardCheney,RichardPerleand others,was likelyviewedbyMJ-12/PI-40asa useful politicaltool for gainingaccess toIraq’s strategicETresources. This had to bemanagedin a way, however,thatwouldmaintainglobalconsensus andnotprecipitate aconflict thatcouldeasily spiralout ofcontrolandleadtotheinterventionofETraces.

LiketheReaganadministrationbeforeit, themoremilitaris- tic impulsesof theBushadministrationneededtoberestrainedby MJ-12/PI-40,ifIraq’s ETresourceswereto begained over the objections ofclandestine organizations based in France,Germany,Russia andChina.

InAugust of 2002 when debate over a preemptive US attack was at its height,Kissingerreleaseda significantpolicystatementthatcautionedtheBush administrationaboutalien- ating its historic allies in dealingwith Iraq. He argued that “the notion ofjustified pre-emptionruns countertomoderninterna-tionallaw which sanctions theuseof forceinself defenseonlyagainstactualratherthanpotentialthreats.”202

This combinedwith key statementsfrom otherformeroffi-cials from Republicanadministrations,suchas formerBush Sr.National SecurityAdvisorand a likely PI-40member,BrentScowcroft,led toPresidentBushmovingtowardsa moreinter-nationalistagendathatembracedtherole of theUN.203

This culminatedin Bush makinga speechbefore the UN adayafter the anniversaryof September11 inwhich heempha-sized theimportanceofconfrontingSaddamHusseinand thekeyrole oftheUNincontainingthethreatposedby roguestates.204

KissingerandScowcroft representeda visible initiativebyMJ-12/PI-40 to rein in theBushHawksinsofar as theimportanceof globalconsensuswas recognizedas a primaryingredientforthestrategicgoalsofmilitarilyinterveninginIraq, removingthe

112

Saddamregime,and gainingaccesstowhateverETtechnologywas hiddeninIraq.

The Republican hawks within the Bush administration had been temporarilyoutflanked by Kissinger, other Republican moderates and MJ-12/PI-40 members.Clandestine organiza-tionsin France,GermanyandRussia, therefore hadmore time toreachanaccommodationwiththeBushadministration.SecurityCouncilResolution1441was a triumphforKissinger’sapproachtopolitically managingtheETpresence.

By February of 2003, it had become clear thatGermany, France and Russia weremaneuvering to block theUS intervention. Rather than this being purely an altruisticdesire to pre-serveglobalpeace in the faceof anunjustifiedUS attacktodestroy“non-existent”weaponsofmassdestruction,theseEuropeanstatesdesiredto keep theUSoutof Iraq duetotheincreasedstrategicpowerthiswould give toUS-basedclandes-tineorganizations.

Kissinger’s role is indicativeof thestrategicstruggleoccur- ringbehind the scenesover ET technology in Iraq, and the shifting alliances this caused. Kissingersubsequently came out with a key policy speech criticizing France and Germany asthreateningtheNATOalliance.205 Hisspeechindicatedthat the time was ripe for a USmilitary invasion.

KissingerandMJ-12/PI-40 hadgiven the blessing foran invasion, which was nowinevitable.Rather thanregionaldevas-tationaswas firstfeared,what occurredinsteadwasa rapidcol-lapseof theSaddamregime.USclandestineorganizationshadachieved theirmilitary objectiveswithoutprecipitatingregionalandglobalchaos.Thepassage of a newUN SecurityCouncilresolution inMay 2003 by amargin of 14-0 endorsingUSadmin-istrationandreconstructionofpost-warIraq by theUN,markeda decisivevictory for theBush administration, and the influence of MJ-12/PI-40 in politically managing the ETpresence.

What was significant in the post-conflict administration of Iraq was the speedydepartureofthePentagonappointedciviladministrator,Jay Garner,andhis replacementby Paul Bremer, a former StateDepartment Ambassador at Large for Terrorism, andsomeone with strong connections to Kissinger, formally in charge of the civiladministrationof Iraq.

113

This indicatedthatthemoremoderatepoliciesbackedby

Kissingerin dealingwith theETpresence,hadprevailedoverthemore confrontationalpoliciesof theBush hawks.ApowerstrugglebetweenmoderateandhawkishfactionsofMJ-12/PI-40wasoccurringbehindthescenes,andtheKissingerbackedmoderateshadbeensuccessful.

Policies implemented by Bremer in terms of setting back the schedule for theelectionof an interimIraq administration,indicatethattheUS is set to remainin militarycontrolof Iraqfor a numberof years.Iraq’srolein termsof beinga hosttoancientETtechnologyandanalyses,which suggestsit playsasignificant role inthepossiblereturnofETraces that sponsoredIraq’sancientSumeriancivilization,makesIraqasignificantactorinthepoliticalmanagementof theETquestion.Conclusion:PoliticallyManagingtheETPresenceandtheChallengetoDemocracyandLibertyinAmericaPolitical management of theETpresence has evolvedconsider-ablysince the SecondWorld War era. Starting initially as a process firmly controlled by Presidentialadministrations that exercised executive overseeing, thereby making it part of thedemocratic processdespite its secrecyand lack of congressional participation, politicalmanagement evolved to the point where Presidential administrations were not fullyinformedof andhadno executivecontrolover many aspectsof theETpresence.

Thismeantthepoliticalmanagementprocesshaddubiousconstitutionalvalidity andwas controlled by a few actorswhocould be tied to theRockefeller-Kissinger axis,andtheirrespectiveties toUScorporationsandelite foreignpolicy bod-ies such as theCouncil on ForeignRelations.

The US-British-Australianinterventionin Iraq suggeststhatpoliticalmanagementof the ET process has evolved to yet another level. Now the US and its allies arepreparedtomilitarilyintervenein othercountriesin orderto gainstrategicgoalsvis-à-vis theETpresence.Themostimportantof thesegoals

114

are to maintainofficial secrecyof the ETpresence,withholdfrom the general public the true nature of the historic role played by ETs in ancientcivilizations, and gain whatever military advantage possible from the reverseengineering of ET tech-nologyfound in countries that, like Iraq, havebeenprominentsiteshostingan ETpresence.

Accordingtowhistleblowers’sources,numerousancientETbasesarebeingincreasinglydiscoveredaroundtheplanet.206Consequently, it is likely that the intervention in Iraq will set a precedent for similarinterventionselsewhereacrosstheplanetfor reasonsthatincreasinglyhavetodowith thepoliticalman-agementof theETpresence.

The strategic thinking of organizations such as MJ-12/PI-40 is based on theperceptionthatthebestanalyticalmindsandstrategicthinkersare employedin managingtheETprocess,andalthoughthismaynotbe acceptablefroma democraticstandpointwhich emphasizes executive or congressionalsupervision of all governmentactivities,itisacceptablefrom anationalsecurityperspective.

Whatcanbeconcludedhere is thattheview thatindeedthe“bestminds”arein chargeof thepoliticalmanagement of the ET presence is misplaced. Information of the ETpresencehas been increasinglycontrolled and spun in a way that suggests that realdecision making power hasbeen inexorablyrestricted to fewer and fewer individualswho reflect conservative political philosophies typically associated with theRepublicanparty.

Althoughitisimpossibletosay exactly how many individualsexercise real influencein politically managing the ET presence, the history of the Rockefeller-Kissingerinvolvementandtheprominent roles playedby Corporate Americaand theCouncilonForeignRelations,suggestthatthis influenceisrestrictedtovery few.

Eisenhower’s warning about the “best minds” not being in control suggests that theeliteclubof “experts”thatdictateshowthe politicalmanagementofthe ET presenceisto beconducted, isoverly influencedby Corporate and elite interests sympathetic toworldviewsassociatedwiththemilitary-intelligencecommunities.Introducinggreatertransparencyinto

115

all aspectsof managing the ET presencewillmakeitpossibleto expand the restricted circle of power and influence that controls informationconcerningtheETpresenceinawaythat doesindeedmakeit possiblefor thebest mindstobe formally inchargeofpolitically managingtheETpresence.

The erosionofexecutivecontrolover thepolitical manage-mentof the ET presencehasreducedPresidentsto at best,rubberstampsofMJ-12/PI-40policies (this appearedtobethecasein the Nixon,Ford, ReaganandbothBushadministra-tions),or,atworst, topolitical impotence as appears to haveoccurredin the cases of theCarter and Clintonadministrations.

Policies ofthepresentBushadministrationindicatethat theUS presidencyis reducedtolittle more thana vehiclefor therealizationofquestionablepoliciesconcerningthemanage-mentthe ET presence. Whencombinedwiththe blanket ofsecrecy that haspreventedthe US CongressandAmericanpublicfrom playinga meaningfulrole in thepoliticalmanage-mentof theETpresence,the currentsituationis a profoundproblemfor thosetruly committedtoprinciplesof democraticgovernance and liberty in theUSandelsewhereon theplanet.

PresidentEisenhowerdemonstratedhebecamealltooaware of the trueproblemconfronting the US asa nation indealing with the ET presence—a de factopoliticalcoup by interestsclosely allied with Corporate America and themilitary- intelligencecommunities.

Itistimefor theAmericanpublictounderstandthetruenatureofhiswarningand tobegincomprehensivepolitical reformsthataddressthethreattoliberty towhichEisenhowerwasalluding.Notes

117.I amvery gratefulto SusanBurton,aka ElizabethO’Rourke,for her editorial assistance and suggestions inproofreadingandeditinganearlier version of this chapter.118.Formore discussionofsuchapoliticalcoup,see StevenGreer,Extraterrestrial Contact: TheEvidence andImplications(CrossingPoint Publications,1999).

119.Anonlinecopy ofTruman’s letterauthorizingcreationofMajestic12isavailableat: http://209.132.68.98/pdf/truman_forrestal.pdf.

116

http://209.132.68.98/pdf/truman_forrestal.pdf

120.See RichardDolan, UFO’sand theNationalSecurityState:Chronology

ofaCover-up1941–1973 (HamptonRoads,2002)pages1–3.121.See“QuotationsfromChairmanWolf”:http://www.drboylan.com/

wolfqut2.html;and Neruda,Interview #1.http://www.wingmakers.com.122.SeeJimMarrs,AlienAgenda:InvestigatingtheExtraterrestrialPresenceAmongUs(HarperPaperbacks, 1997)pages 92–95;andRichardDolan,UFO’sandtheNationalSecurity State,pages5–6.123.SeeStewartSwerdlow,Montauk:The AlienConnection(ExpansionsPublishingCo.2002);PrestonNichols&PeterMoon,MontaukRevisited:AdventuresinSynchronicity(SkyBooks,1991);WadeGordon,The BrookhavenConnection(SkyBooks, 2001).

124.AnonlinecopyofTruman’sletterisavailableat:http://209.132.68.98/pdf/truman_forrestal.pdf.

125.Thisreport canbe foundinRobertandRyanWood,TheMJ-12DocumentsBook.TheReportandbookavailableonlineat:http://www.majesticdocuments.com/products.html.

126.SeeDolan,UFOs andtheNationalSecurity State,pages16–35; andMarrs, AlienAgenda,pages132–49.127.SeeKevin RandleandDonaldSchmitt,TheTruthAboutthe UFOCrash atRoswell (AvonBooks, 1994).128.For extensivediscussionof theseprojectsandtheirpolicyimplica-tions, seeDolan, UFOs andtheNationalSecurity State.

129.See Cooper,Beholda Pale Horse,pages198–99.130.Fordiscussionof eventssurroundingForrestal’s“breakdown”and

“suicide,”seeDolan,UFO’s andtheNationalSecurityState,pages70–76.131. See “Testimony ofMaster Sergent, DanMorris,”Disclosure, ed., Greer, 359; andCooper, Behold a PaleHorse,pages198–99.132.TheresadeVeto, “FromDisinformationtoDisclosure,”SurfingTheApocalypse(October,2001).Availableonlineat:http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.com.

133.See Marrs, RuleBySecrecy,p. 46.134. For discussion of the Rockefeller’s support for liberal international- ism, see Will Banyan, “RockefellerInternationalism,” Nexus magazine, May-June 2003, 19–22, p. 74. Nexus magazine’s homepage is:

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/://www.nexusmagazine.com.135. See Corso, The Day After Roswell. See also a number of whistleblowers testimonies on top secretcorporatemilitaryprojectsfocusedonreverseengineeringETtechnologyinGreer,Disclosure.136. Phil Schneider, “MUFON Conference Presentation, May 1995” available online at:http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/coverup044.html.137.Fittshasawebsiteat:www.solari.comwithahostofresources,reports,interviews andpressstoriesdetailingherclaims.

117



http://www.majesticdocuments.com/products.html

http://www.nexusmagazine.com


http://www.solari.com

138.SeeBanyan,“RockefellerInternationalism,”Nexusmagazine,p. 22;

andJim Marrs, RulebySecrecy(HarperCollins, 2000)pages31–38.139.Marrs, Ruleby Secrecy,p. 36.140.SeeCooper,Beholda PaleHorse,pages207–10. SeealsoMichael

Wolfe,CatchersofHeaven:ATrilogy(DorrancePublishingCo., 1996).141.Cooper,BeholdaPaleHorse,pages 209–210.AnothersourceforKissinger’sleadershippositionisformerAirforceColonelSteveWilson, who describedKissinger as theoverseerofMJ12/PI-40.Seeonline interview withDr.RichardBoylan, at:http://www.drboylan.com/mj12org2.html.

142.Beholda Pale Horse,p. 210.143.Forthisreason,William Cooperclaimsthatin the documentshewitnessed,thisbodywascalledMajority12.Beholda PaleHorse,p. 208.144.Cooper, Beyonda PaleHorse,pages 208–10. For Hoover’s knowledge of ETs/UFO’s, seeMarrs, AlienAgenda,pages180–81.

145.EisenhowerPresidentialDepartureSpeech,January1961.146. StephenGreer is a leading advocate of theview that the lack of congressional/executive supervision ofclandestine military projectsanddecision making processes, isevidence that asilent coup has occurred. SeeGreer,ExtraterrestrialContact.

147.Quoted in“TestimonyofBrigadierGeneralStevenLovekin,”inDisclosure,ed.Greer,235.

148.Available onlineat: http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/johnf.htm.149.Seedocument, “TOPSECRETMemorandum for CIADirector, from President John F. Kennedy,”November12, 1963. Available online at:http://www.majesticdocuments.com. See also, “CONFIDENTIALNational Security Action Memorandum No. 271 for NASAAdministrator (JamesWebb) from John F. Kennedy,November12,1963.”Source:NationalArchives.This documentis citedin LindaMoultonHowe, “JFK,MJ-12 andOuterSpace,”at: http://www.pres-identialufo.8m.com/kennedy&1.htm.150.Cooper,BeholdaPaleHorse,p.215.ForfurtherreferencestoKennedy’sultimatumanddocumentarysourcessupporting that thishad indeed occurred,see Linda MoultonHowe, “JFK, MJ-12 and OuterSpace.” Availableonlineat:http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/kennedy&1.htm.151.One ofthestrongestadvocatesforsuch aviewisCooper,Behold aPaleHorse, pages215–20.Forsimilarviewsfrom government/militaryinsiders, see LindaMoulton Howe, “JFK, MJ-12 andOuter Space.”Available online at:http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/kennedy&1.htm.152.Forwhistleblowertestimonyfrom amilitarycontractoron theloss ofexecutiveoversight,see “TestimonyofA.H.BoeingAerospace,”Disclosure,ed.Greer,p. 401.

118


http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/johnf.htm


http://www.pres-

http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/

http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/kennedy&1.htm

153.See“PresidentLyndonJohnson,1963–69”at:http://www.

presidentialufo.8m.com/presiden2.htm.154. For StevenGreer’s description of various administrations not having this information, see “ExtraterrestrialContact.”155. Corso, The Day After After Roswell, p. 290. See also, “Testimony ofMaster SergeantDan Morris, USAirforce,”inDisclosure,ed.,StephenGreer,p. 358.156.Asmentionedearlier,CooperbelievesKissinger was oneof the twodirectorsof PI-40.BeholdAPale Horse,p. 210.

157.SeeRichard Dolan,UFO’s andthe NationalSecurityState,pages4–15.Marrs, AlienAgenda,pages98–107.158.SeeDolan,UFO’s andtheNationalSecurityState,pages 4–15. Seealso“TestimonyofMasterSergeant DanMorris,”Disclosure, ed.,Greer, p. 363. For online information onOperation Paperclip, see “Secrets of the ThirdReich,”availableat:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart2.htm.159.For a briefbiographicalsummaryof Kissinger,seeSeymourHersh,ThePriceofPower:Kissingerinthe NixonWhitehouse(SummitBooks, 1983)pages25–27.160.Forevidenceof the relationshipbetween theArmy’sCounterintelligenceCorpandthe ET presence,see the followingdeclassifiedreport from22 July 1947concerningthe Roswell inci-dent:http://209.132.68.98/pdf/ipu_report.pdf.

161.See Cooper,Beholda Pale Horse,p. 207.162. SeeCooper, Behold a Pale Horse, pages 202–04; Richard Boylan, “Official Within MJ-12 UFO-SecrecyManagement Group RevealsInsider Secrets”: http://www.drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html; PhilSchneider,

MUFON Conference Presentation, 1995, available online a t :http://www.ufocoverup-conspiracy.com/20.htm://www.ufocoverup-conspiracy.com/20.htm;SeeNerudaInterview#1:http://www.wingmakers.com;Boylan gives amoreextensivecover-ageof eventssurroundingtheTreaty signingin“ExtraterrestrialBaseOnEarth,SanctionedByOfficials Since1954”:http://drboylan.com/basespst2.html; See alsoCorso,The DayAfterRoswell, p. 292.163.See“TestimonyofA.H.BoeingAerospace,” Disclosure, Greer,p. 400; Cooper,Beholda Pale Horse, p.210.164.See“Testimonyof A.H.BoeingAerospace,”Disclosure,Greer, 400;Cooper,Beholda Pale Horse,p. 210.

165.See PhillipCorso,The DayAfter Roswell, pages287–95.166.Cooper,Beholda Pale Horse,p. 210.167.See SeymourHersh, The Price ofPower, p. 18.168.Fordiscussionofthe Secret StudiesGroup,seeRichardBoylan:

http://www.boyland.org.169.SeymourM.Hersh, The Price ofPower.170.See Hersh, The Price ofPower, pages32–34.

119

http://www.violations

http://209.132.68.98/pdf/ipu_report.pdf





http://www.boyland.org

171.Hersh, The Price ofPower, p. 36.

172.AccordingtoformerCol SteveWilson, Kissinger was theoverseerofMJ-12/PI-40.SeeonlineinterviewwithDr.RichardBoylan,at:http://www.drboylan.com/mj12org2.html.173.ForKissinger’sfondness ofBismarkandrealpolitik, see Kissinger,Diplomacy (Simon and Schuster, 1994).SeealsoKissinger,DoesAmericaNeed aForeignPolicy: Toward aDiplomacyfor the 21stCentury(Touchstone,2002).174.BothKissingerandBismarkadmired the work ofthe Renaissancescholar,NicholoMachiavelli,whoespousedthisviewconcerningmorality inhis famouswork,The Prince.

175.For acopy ofCarter’s report,seeGreer,ed., Disclosure,pages448–50.176.See “Testimonyof A.H.BoeingAerospace,”inDisclosure,ed.Greer,pages 400–01; and “Testimony of MrJohnMaynard,(ret) DefenseIntelligenceAgency,”inDisclosure,ed.Greer,p.426;and“Testimonyof PhillipCorso,Jr.,” inDisclosure,ed.Greer,p. 469.

177.“CarterWhiteHouseDeniedUFO Info,” Disclosure Project(March12, 2002) availableonlineat: http://www.disclosureproject.com;seealsohttp://www.100megsfree4.com/farshores/ufotdp2.htm.

178.“CarterWhiteHouseDeniedUFO Info,” Disclosure Project(March12, 2002) availableonlineat: http://www.disclosureproject.com;seealso:http://www.100megsfree4.com/farshores/ufotdp2.htm.

179.See“TestimonyofDrAlfredWebre,SeniorPolicyAnalyst,”inDisclosure,ed.Greer,pages441–44.

180.See ChapterSixfor furtherdiscussionof IranandETgeopolitics.181.Forreferencesto Reagan’santi-ETrhetoric,see “RonaldReagan,

40th President,January20,1981-January20,1989.” Onlinearticle at:http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm.

182.See“RonaldReagan,40thPresident,January20, 1981-January20,1989.”Onlinearticleat:http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm.

183.FordiscussionofET infiltrationofclandestineorganizations,seeChapterFour.184.For a revealinginsight into therigidity he adoptedin his thinking, see his response to a CIA briefing on thePalestinian issuewhen he was President-elect: “RonaldReagan, 40th President, January 20, 1981- January 20,1989.”Onlinearticleat: http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm.

185.“RonaldReagan,40thPresident,January20,1981-January20,1989.”Onlinearticleat:http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm.

186.See“RonaldReagan,40thPresident,January20, 1981-January20,1989.”Onlinearticleat:http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm.

120

http://www.drboylan.com/mj12org2.html


http://www.100megsfree4.com/farshores/ufotdp2.htm


http://www.100megsfree4.com/farshores/ufotdp2.htm

http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm


http://www.presidentialufo.8m



187.“RonaldReagan,40thPresident,January20,1981-January

20,1989.”Onlinearticleat:http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm.

188.“RonaldReagan,40thPresident,January20,1981-January20,1989.”Onlinearticleat:http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm.

189.Corso,The DayAfter Roswell, pages291–93.190. SeeGlennKrawczyk, “MindControl and the NewWorld Order,” Nexus magazine (Feb/March 1993)excerpts available online at:

http://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/mc_nwo.html://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/mc_nwo.html.191. For discussion of the infamous Project Monarch, see Ron Patton, “Project Monarch: Nazi Mind,” TheConspiracyReader:FromtheDeathsofJFK andJohnLennonto Government-SponsoredAlienCover-Ups,eds.,AlHidell &JoanD’Arc(CitadelPress,1999) pages197–213.Available online at: http://www.aches-mc.org/monarch.html.192.SeeWebsterG.Tarpley&AntonChaitkin, GeorgeBush:TheUnauthorizedBiography,published onlineat:http://www.kmf.org/williams/bushbook/bush15.html.193.ForanalysisoffactorsforwhytheColdWarended,seeRalphSummyandMichaelSalla,ed.,WhytheColdWarEnded(GreenwoodPress, 1995).194. This certainly is Stephen Greer’s view after interviewing/briefing various senior officials in the Clintonadministration.ExtraterrestrialContact.195. “Dr. Steven Greer Interview with Art Bell,” August 30, 2001, available online at:http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/part5.htm.

196.Available onlineat: http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/part5.htm.197.“Remarksbythe President and the FirstLadyat “The Lightingof the CityChristmas Tree,” Belfast CityHall, Belfast, Northern Ireland, November 1995. Published online at: http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/part8.htm.198.FortranscriptofaCNNinterviewwhereBushacknowledgesCheney’sexpertise ontheET/UFOissue,goto:http://www.rense.com/general3/ufobush.htm.199.MichaelWolf discussesthe influenceof sucha cabalin CatchersofHeaven, 382–83; see also his interviewwith Richard Boylan, in Boylan and Boylan, Labored Journey To The Stars. Available online at:

http://www.boylan.com/wlfk2a.html://www.boylan.com/wlfk2a.html.200.SeeZechariaSitchin,The12thPlanet(Avon Books,1976); WilliamBramley, GodsofEden(Avon,1989);&R.A.Boulay, FlyingSerpentsandDragons:TheStoryofMankind’sReptilianPast(BookTree,1999).201.Thiswillbeexaminedmoreclosely inChapterSix.An earlier versionof this chapterwas printedas MichaelSalla, “America’sTriumph&

121



http://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/mc_nwo.html

http://www.aches-mc.org/monarch.html

http://www.kmf.org/

http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/part5.htm


http://www.boylan.com/wlfk2a.html

Europe’sAngst—TheSecretRace toControlIraq’s ETTechnology,”Study PaperNo. 3:www.exopolitics.org.

202.Kissinger “Calls forPolicyOutline,”ABCNews, Australia, August13,2002:http://www.abc.net.au/am/s647064.htm.203.See BrentScowcroft,“Don’tAttack Saddam:Itwould undermineourantiterrorefforts.”WallStreetJournal,August15,2002:http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110002133.204.PresidentGeorge Bush,“Addressto the UnitedNationsGeneralAssembly,”NewYork,NY, September 12,

2002. Available online at: http://www.cfr.org/publication.php://www.cfr.org/publication.php?id=4834.xml.205. See “Transatlantic anger.” Daily Telegraph, 11/02/2003, Available online at:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/02/11/wirq211a.xml.

206.See “TestimonyofA.H.BoeingAerospace,”Disclosure,p. 401.

122


http://www.abc.net.au/am/s647064.htm

http://www.cfr.org/publication.php

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml

Chapter3FoundationsforGloballyManagingExtraterrestrial

Affairs—TheLegacyof theNaziGermany-ExtraterrestrialConnection

Introduction207Thereiscompellingevidencethatinthe early1930s,thetechnologyandpresenceofoneormore extraterrestrial(ET)racesbecameknownto the leadersofNaziGermanywhoembarkedonanambitiousefforttocommunicatewith theseracesfor thepurposeof acquiringtheiradvancedtechnology.Usingcommunicationtechniquesthatwouldbewidely dis- missed today as “psychic channeling,” there is evidence that the Nazisponsorship ofoccult societies that specialized in this form of communication withtheseETraces,was successfulingaininginformationthatproducedrapidtechnologicalbreakthroughs that eventually came to the attention of the intelligence services ofBritain, France,USSRandtheUSA.

Althoughpredictablydismissiveof suchesotericpracticesby the Nazi regime,eachof the intelligence servicesof thesemajor states initiated efforts to attain whateverintelligenceinformationtheycould,on thepurportedNazi communicationmethods withan ETrace(s) while monitoringthe“ET inspired”technologybeingdevelopedby NaziGermany.

Atatimeofgrowinginternationaltension,withanothermajorEuropean war(WorldWar2) loomingonthe horizon,majorglobalpowerswouldhavebeen concerned abouttheramifications ofNaziGermany seeking toacquire advancedtechnology through esotericformsofcommunicationwith

124

ET races. Although sightings of ET/UFOcraftwererelatively rareinthe 1930s,historicallythere hadalreadybeen asufficientnumbertoraise thepossibilityofanETpresenceon theplanet.208

NotonlywasNazi Germany actively developing technology thatwas inspiredthroughsuch communication; it hadalso learned of remote locationsaround the planetwhere it could retrieve ET artifacts. The Nazis sponsored numerous expeditions toremote locations, the results ofwhichwere largely unknown to Western intelligenceservices.209

There is also evidence that Nazi Germany was able to eventually retrieve anoperational “ET craft,”which suggested theNazis were beingassistedby oneor moreETraces.210In this chapter I analyze how global management of what can be defined as“ExtraterrestrialAffairs”—governmentpoliciesdeal-ing with theexistenceof ETracesand ETinspiredtechnology—hasasits foundationseventsthatoccurred duringthe 1930swhenETsfirst begantocommunicatewith theleadershipof amajor world government.The fact that itwasNaziGermanythatbegana campaigntoestablishmilitary dominancein Europe, is significant in terms of the way the ET presence would later be globallymanaged by thevictoriousAllied powers that emergedfrom the carnageof the SecondWorld War.

I beginby analyzingNazi Germany’s “success” in communicatingwith ET racesand gaininginformationfor thedevelop-mentof ET inspired technology thatwouldbeusedtobuildoffensiveweaponsfor theNazi war effort.I willargue thatthe“successful”conclusionof theSecondWorld War led toa rudeawakeningon thepart of theAlliedpowersof thefullramifica-tionsof theNazi successesindevelopingETtechnology.

Not only hadNazi Germany successfully developed and/or reverse engineered ETtechnology through questionable psy-chic channeling methods, discoveredof ETartifactsandretrieved anET craft,butthere is evidencethatasignificantnumberof theNazi elite had escaped with the most advanced of their ET inspired technology tohiddenlocationsinAntarcticaandSouthAmerica.

This meant that contrary to public perceptions of a successful conclusion to theSecondWorldWar,asignificantportion

125

of Nazi Germany’s most advanced technologicalassetsandmilitary-scientificelitewereoutsidethereachof thevictoriousAllied powers.

What compounded theseriouspolicy dilemmaconfronting theAllied Powers withthecontinuationof remnantsof theNaziregimeinAntarcticaandSouthAmerica was thephysical inter-ventionofET racesthatseriouslyimpactedonthe need tomanagetheETpresenceglobally.Evenmore disturbingwasthepossibilitythattheeliteremnantsof theNazi regimewerebeingassistedbyone ormore ET races,therebymakingitimpossiblefora completeeradicationof theNazi presence.

What follows is an effort to identify the main policies used by major states togloballymanagetheacquisitionand develop-mentof ET technology, respond to theETpresence,anddealwiththe policyconsequencesof Nazieliteshiddenin secretbasesintheAntarcticandSouthAmerica.Nazi Germany’sPre-WarProgramstoDevelopETInspiredTechnologyAdolphHitler’s fascination with Occult Sciences, Esotericphilosophies andexotictechnologiesledhim toexploitwhat-everavenueshehadingainingaccess to anddevelopingweapons technologies thatwould allow Nazi Germany to gain its rightfulplace,inHitler’sview, as a leadingglobalpower.211As a follower of occult sciences, Hitler was well aware of the possibility ofcommunicatingwithextraterrestrialracesthroughmethodssuchas“psychicchanneling”wherebyanindividualcouldestablishcommunicationwithnon-physicaland/ordis-tantlifeforms andtransmitinformation.

Such communication was well known among the Occult societies scatteredthroughoutNorthernEuropewhostudiedtheworkofmystics such asHelenaBlavatsky.Theywroteexten-sively of heresoteric communications with other“life forms”andhow todevelopthesecommunicationabilities.212

Althoughthegeneralpublictodaydismissessuchphenomenaas ludicrous,thereiscompellingevidencethatnotonly did Hitler take itseriously, but he also devotedconsiderable

126

resources of the Nazi state intoconvertinginformationgainedfromsucheffortsintotechnologydevelopmentandweaponsproduction.213 Much of theinformation gained in such “psychic communications” led to Nazi expeditions in theperiod before the Second World War to remote locations such as Tibet, Antarctica,South America, Iraq and elsewhere in search of buried ET artifacts from earliercivilizations.

VrilSociety,oneoftheprincipalNaziOccult societiessupported byHitler,“wasallegedly‘channeling’messagesfromanaliencivilizationinthe Aldebaransolarsystemand planned to develop a craft that could make physical contact with the civilizationthere.”214 Another significant Occult Group was the Thule Society that was similarlyclaiming tobe in com-munication with an advanced race. Insteadof an off-world ETrace,however, this was anadvanced humanracewith Nordic features from an ancientEarth civilization that inhabited subterranean territories accessible from the polarregionsandothersecludedareasaroundtheplanet.215

The seriousnessandsupportgivenby Hitler tosuchcom-municationsis evidencedby the scientific resources given to these Occult societies for developing their “ETinspired” technologies. By 1934, for example, “the Vril Society had appar- entlydevelopeditsfirstUFOshaped aircraft,knownastheVril 1, which was propelledby ananti-gravityeffect.”216

Although there was predictable skepticism by more tradi- tional branches of theGermanmilitary of theviability of such“channeled”information,theNazi SSwereatthe forefrontofefforts todevelop this “exotic” technology. Later in theSecondWorldWar,the Nazi SS wouldtakeovercompletecontrolofHitler’s“scientific-military-occultcomplex”ensuringthe high-estlevelofsecrecyindevelopingandoperationalisingET-inspiredtechnology.

Hitlerviewedsuch technologiesas partofa“naturalorder”hewishedto establishasrevealedin aninterviewhehadin1934 with the son of a German scientist, Viktor Schauberger, a pioneer in aviationtechnologybasedon anti-gravitypropulsion:

In Juneof1934my fatherwasinvitedbythe Reich’sChancellorAdolphHitlerto discusshiswork.Hitler

127

wanted to know about hisdiscoveriesandtalk aboutthe variouspossibilitiesandwhathis great planwas.Andhe said “yes, I’mlookingfor a new technology thatmust once again harmonize with the natural order ofthingsandthatismyreal program.”217

Hitler gave powerful material support toSchaubergersuggesting thepattern by

which technologies, which harmonizedwith Hitler’s occult/naturalistic worldviews,wouldbesupported:

Schauberger was given a team of scientists to help himwith his work . . . theyperfected the “flying disc”pow-ered by Schauberger’s turbinewhich rotated airinto a twisting type of oscillation resulting in the build-up of immense powercausing levitation [anti-gravity propulsion]. Schauberger’s prototype was thendevelopedintoa vehicleknownastheBelluzzo-Schriever-MietheDiskus, a machinebuilt up to 22 ft in diameter. These craft traveled at over 2000 km/hr and wereplannedtogoover 4,000km/hr. By1945 they could reach 1300mphandgainanaltitudeof 40,000feetin lessthanthreeminutes.The craft was also notedtoglowblue-greenasitroseandleft a silveryglow.218

A number ofUS intelligence sources testified that NaziGermany had indeed

developed technology that resembled modern day UFOs. According to VirgilArmstrong,aformer CIAagent:

Weknow thatin theearly partsof thewar there werecertainfactionsof theAlliedforcesthatdid not believehe[Hitler] hada secret weapon and it wasn’t until theAmericansmademuch emphasisof this that they began tolook atit seriously andindeeddid discoverthat Hitlernotonly hada secretweapon,hehadwhatwe wouldcalltodayaUFOor spacecraft.219

Another prominent US military official who testified about the Nazi supported

technologieswasCaptainEdRuppelt,who

128

was the initial Chief Investigator for USAirForceProjectBluebook: “WhenWWIIended, theGermans had several radi- cal types of aircraft andguidedmissilesunderdevelopment.Themajority wereinthemostpreliminarystages,butthey were the onlyknowncraft thatcouldevenapproach the performance of objectsreportedtoUFO observers. . .”220AstronautEdgarMitchellalsoconfirmedin 1991thatmuchofthe ETcoverup datedfrom theSecondWorld War.221

Therehavealso beenreports that NaziGermany hadretrieved a“crashed” ETcraft.222 Colonel Phillip Corso, who was a senior officer in charge of reverseengineeringETtech-nologyduringthe EisenhowerandKennedy administrations,gavesupporttosuch an eventinan interview:

Therewerecrasheselsewhere, and they [the Germans]gatheredmaterial too. TheGermanswereworking on it.They didn’tsolve thepropulsionsystem.They did alotofexperimentsonflying saucers.Theyhadone thatwentupto 12,000feet.Butwhere all,weandthey,missedoutwasonthe guidancesystem.In R&Dwebeganto realize that this being [an ET] was part of the guidance system, part of theapparatushimself, oritself,as ithadno sexual organs.”223

Ifsucha crashhadindeedoccurred, ontopof whateverinformationwasgainedfromthe Nazi Occult Societies communication with ET races, then this would haveconsiderablyboostedNaziGermany’sefforts todevelopETtechnology for acampaignofmilitary conquestinEurope.

It is very likely thatat somestage in the timebefore theonsetof the SecondWorldWar in 1939,military intelligence officials from the Western democracies and theSovietUnionguessed there had been a crash, from the available evidence: intelligenceassessments of Nazi sponsored occult societies, Hitler’s support of esotericphilosophies and practices, fully funded Nazi expeditions to remote locations around the planet, and the technological innovations supported in Nazi scientificlaboratories.ItappearedthatNaziGermanywasseriousindevelopingtechnologythatHitlerandhisseniorofficialsgainedfrom occultcommunicationswithETs.

129

ThescientificculturaltraditionsofboththeWestern

democracies, based on “scientific rationalism” developed in the European Age ofEnlightenment; and of the Soviet Unionwhere aMarxistHistoricalMaterialism wasdominant, wouldhave led to themilitary intelligence communities of theWesterndemocracies and the Soviet Union, dismissing the relevance of Hitler’s occultcommunications. Nevertheless, the fact that Hitler was actively supporting suchcommunicationswith the scientific assets of theNazi statewould have warranted closemonitoringof thesituation.

AsmoreinformationabouttheUFO presenceemergedinthe late1930s,predictablyWesternandSoviet intelligenceserviceswouldhavebeen concernedthatHitler’s occultcom-municationswith ETs mightgiveNazi Germanyan importantmilitary advantageinany futurewar.

More disturbing fromthe perspective ofWestern intelligence sources was thepossibilitythatNaziGermany was tacitly beinggiven assistance from an ETrace inthese communications despite Hitler’s militaristic policies in Europe. That NaziGermany received assistance from ETs was suggested by the father of modernrocketry,HermannOberth,whocon-firmedaNazi-ETconnectionwhenhe stated, “Wecannot takecredit forour record advancement in certain scientific fields alone. Wehave been helped.” When asked by whom, he replied, “the peoples of otherworlds.”224ThelikelihoodthatNaziGermanyhadcomeintopossessionofa“crashed”ET craft may have been evidence of some form of tacit assistance given to NaziGermanyby oneormoreETraces.

From theperspectiveofanETrace communicatingand evenvisiting theEarth in the1930s,Nazi Germanywould have beena logical choice for such “assistance.” Hitler’sreceptiveness to esoteric practices and technologies meant that such an ET race had ameansof communicating with a majorworldpowerat a timewhenothergovernments would have been suspicious of the policies of visiting ET races and of opening upunfamiliarchannelsofcommunicationwithoneormoreofthem.

Theideaof establishingcommunicationthroughesotericpracticessuchas“psychicchanneling”wouldhavebeendis-missedas ludicrousor evendangerousby WesternandSoviet

130

policy makerswho werestillattemptingtodiscoverasmuchastheycouldabouttheETpresencethroughmore conventionalmilitary intelligencesourcesand scientific methods.Much later,theUSandotherAllied statesdeveloped theirownprotocolsandstandardsfor establishingcommunicationwith ETnationsthroughsimilarpsychicchannelingtechniquespioneered bytheNaziOccultsocieties.

Former Air force Sergeant, Dan Sherman, revealed his own training intelepathic/psychiccommunicationbytheNationalSecurity Agency,which isthepremierUSorganizationforcom-municatingwithETraces.225

IngivingwhateverlimitedassistanceitcouldtoNaziGermany,assumingprotocolsexist for advanced races communicating with the governments ofworlds not yetpossessing a unified global government, ET races in communication with Naziauthorities possibly received benefits in return that would have been a cause forconcernbythefuture Alliedpowers.ThepossibilitiesofatacitalliancebetweenNaziGermany and an ET race, even if this only went as far as Nazis using psychics tocommunicatewithsucharace,wouldcer-tainlyhavegivenriseto animportantquestionbythe futureAllied powers.226

WouldHitlerrisk the best interest ofglobalhumanityinexchangeforwhat wouldfacilitateGermany’sre-emergenceasamajorworldpower?227Theymostlikely answeredyes and played for time in deciding how to deal with Hitler’s aggressive nationalist policies;thetechnologydevelopedbyHitler’s“military-scientific-occult”complex;and to the nature of the“threat,” if any,posed by the ET presence to human sover-eigntyon theplanet.

The possibilityofNazi successindevelopingsomeform ofcommunicationwith anET raceandevenhavingdirectaccess to ET technology would have contributed to theeagerness of Britain to accommodate Germany’s concerns in redressing inequitiesfromtheVersaillesPeaceAgreement.Any politicalanddiplomaticdialogueto addressthese matters, even if it upset Britain’smainEuropean ally, France,would giveBritainmuchneeded timeto gauge the securitythreat posedbyHitler’s regimeandhis exoticweaponsacquisitionprograms.

131

TheMunichagreement struckbetweenthe BritishPrime

Minister, Neville Chamberlain, and Hitler in resolving the 1938 crisis over Germanpopulatedareasof Czechoslovakia,meantCzechoslovakialostterritoryandits importantdefenseassets.Fromthe perspectiveofBritainandFrance,suchastrategicgamblewasnecessaryif indeedNaziGermanywere to bepersuadedthatit couldbenefitgreatlyifitchose to cooperate with the West in responsibly dealing with the ET presence andtechnology.

Cooperation with the West in terms of financial support and investment fromWestern corporations had already provided the bulk of Nazi Germany’s re-industrialization efforts. Major US and British corporations invested heavily in NaziGermanindus-triesandestablishedimportantrelationshipswith seniorNazileaders.228

Ratherthanmerelybeinga temporaryphenomenonmadepossibleby thebrief periodwhen major Westernstatessuch asBritain and theUS hadconsiderable sympathyforNazi effortstoremovetheinequitiesof theVersaillesPeaceTreaty,229thereis compellingevidencethatsuchrelationshipscontinuedevenduringthewarperioditself. Rockefeller-controlled StandardOil Co., for example, had extensive dealings with the Germanpetrochemical giant I.G. Farben in oil and chemical sectors, and their relationshipcontinuedevenaftertheUSenteredthewar inDecember1941.

InMay1942,criminal chargeswereinitiallybroughtagainstStandard Oil executivesand later dropped, but its dealswith I.G. Farben became subject to a Senate SpecialCommitteeInvestigatingtheNationalDefenseProgramchaired by HarryTruman.230The SecondWorldWar, theNazi-ETConnectionandtheCovertNazi ExodusThe 1939 deal struck between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union to divide Polandbetween themwas the action that trig- gered the SecondWorld War. For Britain andFrance,itmeantthatNaziGermanywasfixedonacampaignofEuropean

132

dominationregardlessofanypoliticalconcessionsmadebytheformerfor thesakeofpeaceinEurope.

Ifitwere truethatGermanyhadindeedreceivedtacitassistancefromanET raceand/or had acquired ET inspired technology, Germany’s invasion of Poland hadprofound impli-cations. Thismeant Germany would have to be quicklydefeatedbeforeitcouldfullyoperationalizewhateverETinspired technologyor informationithadin its possessionforoffensiveweaponry.

Nothingwas spared in themain war objective of defeating the Axis powers whoconstituted a long termthreat notonly for European democracies, but also for thesovereignty of global humanity vis-à-vis one or more ET races tacitly assisting NaziGermany. Winston Churchill, the British Conservative Prime Minister, rebuffed alleffortsto strikea peace dealwithNazi Germanydespite thegenerous termsoffered byHitler.231

After therapid militarydefeatofFrancein1940, Britainwasdesperatetoengage theUSinthewar as soonas possible,toassistin thedefeatof Germany.Althoughthis wouldundoubtedly have been a logical policy for Britain or any nation embroiled in adesperatemilitary strugglewithaformidablemilitary opponent, thenatureof Germany’stechnological programs and the likely ET connection required immediate action bymajor non-belligerentssuch as theUS.

In the early stages of the War, President Roosevelt, was informed of the ETpresence and the likelihood that NaziGermanywas rapidly developing offensiveweapons based onET technology andassistance. According toDr. MichaelWolf,whoclaimsto havebeen amemberofthe secret NationalSecurityCouncilbodythatoverseesET affairs in the US, “The first UFO came down in 1941 into theoceanwest of SanDiego,and was retrievedby theNavy.”232 Anotherdatefor this discov-erygivenby thenowdeceasedColonelWilliam BrophywasFeb25, 1942.233

Noneof these justificationsfor enteringthewar, however,couldbe revealed to thegeneralpublicor theUSCongress.ThismadenecessaryanalternativecourseofactionbyUSpolicymakers.ItislikelythatPresidentRooseveltandtheBritishPrimeMinister,WinstonChurchill,contrivedpolitical

133

events in the Pacific so it would beinevitablethatImperialJapan would attack the American Pacific Fleet based at Pearl Harbor.234 Such acontrivancewouldhavebeen necessary,giventhatHitler hadtakenall thestepshecouldin ensuringthattheUSwouldnot enterthewar on thesideofBritain.

When forexample,PresidentRooseveltlent fiftydestroyerstoBritain in 1940withoutconsulting Congress, Prime Minister Churchill remarked: “This was a decidedlyunneutralact by theUnitedStates”andshould,“accordingto all the standardsofhistoryhave justified the German Government in declaring War.”235 Hitler, however,rememberedwellthe lesson fromWorldWarIand didnot even bother to make anofficialprotest.236

Essentially,therewas noway of persuadingtheAmericanpublicoftheneedtosidewithBritainifNaziGermanywas clearly avoidingits errorfrom theFirst WorldWar—whenitsunrestrictedsubmarinewarfarebroughttheUSinto thewar.

EvidenceoftheUSrecoveringadownedETcraftin1941/42,mayhavebeena meansof ETs levelingtheplayingfieldintermsofprovidingsimilarETtechnologiestotherespectivesidesin theWorldWar.Germany’sinvasionoftheSovietUnion in 1941was testimony toHitler’s confidence that his secret weaponstechnologyprogramswouldbe successfulin producingtheoffensiveweapons requiredforNazi victoriesinEurope.

At the end of the war, the superiority of NaziGermany’s technology was starklyrevealedbycorrespondence betweenMajorGeneralHughKnerr, DeputyCommanding General forAdministration of US Strategic Forces in Europe, andLieutenantGeneralCarlSpatzinMarch 1945:

Occupationof Germanscientificandindustrialestab-lishmentshasrevealedthefactthatwehavebeenalarminglybackward in manyfieldsof research. Ifwedonottakethisopportunityto seizeapparatusandthebrainsthatdevelopedit andputthis combinationback to workpromptly, wewill remain several years behind whileweattempttocoverafieldalreadyexploited.237

134

This suggests that the years in whichNazi Germanywere

developing ET inspired technologies, while the Allied powerswere skeptical of thecommunicationtechniquesusedby theNazi’ssponsorshipof occultsocieties,produceda seriousgap.

At the time it became known thatNazi Germany’s offensiveweapons capabilitieswere derived from its communications with ET races and likely recovery of ETtechnology, Britain, theUS and even the SovietUnion, were already far behind thetechnologicaldiscoveriesmadeby theNazis. Even thediscov-ery andretrievalof ETcraft by the US in 1941/42, would not have enabled the Allies to bridge thetechnologicalgapwithNaziGermany.The Nazi RetreattoAntarctica,“OperationHigh Jump”andETAssistanceThe official defeat of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan in 1945was in fact a tacticalvictorythat maskedamajor strategicdefeatfor the“victoriousAllies” that was keptfromthegeneralpublic.A significantproportionof Nazi Germany’spoliticalelite, theirmostadvancedET technologyandfully operational“saucerships”had escapedfrom Alliedoccupationforces.238AccordingtoRichardWilson andSylviaBurns:

The Germansin thescientificcommunityknew thewarwas lostas early as 1942.They decidedtoestablishaplan forcontinuingthedreamoftheThirdReichdespitethewar.Theydecidedthat theestablishmentofasepa-rate society foundedonNaziprinciplesofgeneticpuritywas theanswer.The developmentof gravitationaltech-nologyaidedthatplan.OnFebruary23,1945,thenewestenginesof theKugelbitzweretested andthenextracted from thecraft. The Kugelbitz was blown up bySSpersonnel and thescientists,plans and engineswereshipped outofGermany tothe South Polar regions,where the Germans had maintained underground con-structionactivitysince 1941.Twodays later, on February25, 1943,the undergroundplantatKhala wasclosed

135

and all the workers sent toBuchenwaldand gassed.TheGermansalso sent their “aryan elite”childrenand otherelementsoftheirsocietyto the undergroundbase.GeneralHans Kammler, who disappearedinApril1945,wasinstrumentalin the evacuationoperation,aswasGeneralNebe.There,theGermans developed a eugenic society thatapparently is limited to a specificnumber of people. They’re still there. Apparently they also maintain technicalcoloniesinSouthAmerica.239

What remained of Nazi Germany’s advanced weapons programs was disturbing

enough in termsof theoverall technological advances achievedby theNazis in manyfields of weapons production.240 The fact that the Nazis had removed their mostadvancedsecrets,technologyandpersonneldirectlybeforethefinaldefeatof Germanywould have been a huge shock to Allied leaders once it became clear what hadoccurred.241

AmegalomaniacNazileadershipthatcouldnotacceptinevitabledefeatwas infacta holdingactionforamethodicallywell plannedextractionof theNazis’ mostvaluableresourcesandpersonnel towellpreparedremotelocations in theAntarcticandSouthAmerica. This allowed the Nazis to continue their unique social system, and plan toeventuallyplay animportant,ifnot dominantrole inglobalaffairs.

The Nazis hadsufficienttimeandresourcestoprepareforsuch an exodusgiventheirextensive business links, front companies, and connections with South Americangovernmentsand companies.The well equippedexpeditions totheAntarctic in the pre-warperiodallowedthe Nazis to familiarize them-selveswith theAntarctic terrainandlaythefoundationsforanypost-warroletobeplayedby theseterritories.

Themost ambitiousNaziexpeditionoccurredin1938 whenextensiveportionsoftheAntarcticwere claimed byCaptainAlfred Ritscheron behalf of the Nazi government.The aircraftcarrier,Schwabenland,sentplanestoperformextensiveaerialsurveillanceoftheregionclaimedbyNaziGermany,whichwascalledNeuschwabenland.242Duringthewar itself,extensivesubmarine activity in the regionof Antarctica suggested thatNaziscouldhavebeenbuildingbases.Sucha possibilitywas

136

fueled by a comment made by thecommanderofNaziGermany’s submarinefleet,Admiral KarlDonitz in 1943,whenhe claimedthathis fleethadbuilt “in anotherpartoftheworldaShangri-Laland—animpregnablefortress.”243

AfterGermany’sunconditionalsurrenderonMay 8,1945,Nazisubmarineactivityinthe Antarctic region continued as evidenced by the following report by the AgenceFrance Press on September 25, 1946: “The continuous rumors about German U-boatactivity in the region of Tierra del Fuego [‘Feuerland’ in German] between thesouthernmost tip of Latin America and the continent of Antarctica are based on truehappenings.”244

What compoundedthis realizationofaNazi elite exodustoAntarcticafor theAllieswas the now irrefutableevidence thatETraces wereindeedvisiting theEarth. The ETpresencewouldnow bea factorin theAlliespursuinganderadicatingthe rem-nantsofNaziGermany thathadrelocated to AntarcticaandSouthAmerica, andwho were nowusingtheir fullyoperational“saucerships”to movearoundthe planetandevenfly intodeepspace.

ManyoftheUFOswitnessedintheimmediatepostwarera,accordingtoreportsfromanumberofmilitaryofficialsawareoftheadvancednatureof theNazis’ technology,werefullyoper-ationalNazi spacecraft.245

A little known effort toonceandfor all end theNazi threatoccurredwith aNavalmilitaryexpeditionledbyAdmiralRichardByrdtotheAntarctic in1946/47. Byrd’smilitaryexpeditionwas named“OperationHigh Jump”andconsistedof“4700militarypersonnel, six helicopters, six MartinPBMflying boats, two seaplane tenders, fifteenotheraircraft,thirteenUSNavy supportships and oneaircraft carrier; theUSSPhilippineSea.”246

Among the commands issued to AdmiralByrdfromtheCommander of the USNavy,AdmiralChesterNimitzwere:“(b) toconsolidateandextendAmericansovereigntyoverthelargest practicalarea of theAntarcticcontinent;(c) to deter-mine thefeasibilityof establishing and maintainingbases in theAntarctic and to investigate possible basesites.”247 Ironically, itwas Admiral Byrd who had earlier addressed CaptainRitscher’sNazi expeditionbefore it departedfor Antarcticain 1938/39.

137

Now Admiral Byrdwas leadinga USNaval Expeditiontoseekout andeliminatetheNazi elite who escapedtobasescreatedor “discovered”duringtheSchwabenlandexpedition.

The Antarctic summer of 1946/47was the first opportunity to mount such a largemilitary expeditiontothefrigid regionsofAntarctica.Comingsosoonafterthe end ofthe Second World War, it was a puzzle why such a large armada would travel toAntarcticaat a timeof increasing ColdWar tension and decommissioning of Navalpersonnel,unlesstheexpedi-tionwassentto militarily dealwithsomeunresolvedissuesfromtheWaritself—remnantsof theNazielitehiddenin anundergroundbaseor basesestablishedor “discovered”inthepre-warera.

Hitler hadauthorizeda numberof military missionsto theAntarctic in thepre-warera making it possible that oneor more underground bases had been established ordiscovered.248 TheByrdmission was scheduled tolast up tosixmonthsbut ended in amere eightweeksbecauseit had,accordingto ChileanPressreports,“runintotrouble”andthere hadbeen “manyfatalities.”249 If the truegoalof themissionwas to locateanderadicate anyNazi bases, press reports andearlyend to themission indicated dismalfailureanda rudeawakeningfor theUSNavy.

AMarch5, 1947Chileanpressinterviewof AdmiralByrd,afterthe prematureend ofOperation High Jump, suggested there had indeed been a military failure and a newthreatwaslocatedattheSouthPole:

Adm. Byrd declared today that it was imperative for the United States to initiateimmediatedefensemeasuresagainsthostileregions.The Admiral furtherstatedthathedidn’t wantto frightenanyoneundulybutit was abitter reality that in caseof anewwar the continental United States would be attacked by flying objects whichcouldflyfrom poletopoleatincrediblespeeds.250

Itwas clear that thebest theUSNavy couldmusterwas nomatch for the small but

well armedNazi elitethatsurvivedthewar in their remoteAntarctic location.Again, thepossibility that

138

theNaziswere receivingET assistanceinfendingoff theUSattackcouldnotbe discounted. Nazisefforts through occultgroups suchas the ThuleSociety to communicate with an advanced subterranean humanoid civilization,“Thule,”mayhaveresultedin the eliteNazis beingassisted in relocating to thehiddenAntarcticbaseandpossiblyreceivingsignificantETsupport from any attackby the USanditsallies.

A little known expedition of Admiral Byrd to theNorth Pole at the same time ofOperation High Jump where he suppos- edly came into contact with an advancedsubterraneanracewithNordicphysicalcharacteristicssuggeststhatthe ThuleSocietyhadindeedbeencorrectin its assessmentof theexis-tenceof such a race.Admiral Byrddisclosedthecircumstancesofthis encounterina posthumously published entry inhisdiary.The leaderof this advancedsubterraneanracegreetedhim:

“Wehavelet you enterherebecauseyou areof noblecharacterandwell-knownon theSurface Wor ld,Admiral” . . . you are in the domain of the Arianni, theInner World of the Earth . . . Admiral, I shall tell you why you have beensummonedhere.Ourinterest rightlybeginsjustafteryourraceexplodedthe firstatomicbombsoverHiroshimaandNagasaki,Japan.It was atthatalarmingtimewesentourflyingmachines,the‘Flugelrads,’toyoursurfaceworldto investigatewhatyour racehaddone . . . Yousee,we haveneverinter-feredbeforeinyour race’swars andbarbarity,butnowwemust, for you have learned to tamper with a certain power that is not for man,namely, that ofatomicenergy.Our emissarieshavealreadydeliveredmessages tothepowersof your world,andyet theydonotheed.Nowyou have beenchosen tobewitness herethat ourworlddoes exist.Yousee,ourCulture andScienceis manythousandsofyears beyondyour race,Admiral.”251

Theveracityof Byrd’sdairy continues to be debated, but Byrd’s comments to the

Chilean Press suggests he was sufficiently unnerved by events related to his polarexpedition(s)in1946/47for suchan encountertohaveoccurred.Subsequent

139

reports of extensive UFO activity in theAntarcticregionwereconfirmation thatAntarcticwas beingusedas a baseof operations for thenew enemythat so unnervedAdmiralByrd—eitherNaziGermanyand/oroneormoreETraces.252Foundationsfor GlobalManagementofExtraterrestrialAffairsThe“victorious” Alliedpowers (whocalled themselves theUnitedNations,eventuallybecoming the official name of the new international organization to replace theLeague o fNations in 1945) formed the foundations of a post-WorldWar II order inresponse to events thathadpreceded andoccurredduring theWar. The most importanteventasidefrom the visitation ofETraces themselves was the rapid technologicaladvances achieved by Nazi Germany’s scientists as a result of sponsoring esotericcommunication techniques with ET races. Primary lessons learned from the Nazi-ETconnectionwerethefollowing:

• ET raceswere visiting the Earthandeager to establishongoingcommunicationswiththepolitical leadershipsofmajor nationalgovernments.• Psychic communicationtechniqueswithETracesplayeda significantrolein NaziGermany’srapidtechnologicaladvancements.• ETartifactsdatingfromantiquitycouldbe foundinremote locationsaroundtheplanet,andhada potentialforrapidtechnologicaladvancesby their discoverers.• One or more ET races tacitly supported Nazi Germany’s weapons acquisitionprograms.• ETraceswouldnotdirectlyintervenein violentnationalconflictsandappeared toplayanevenhanded role inassistingbelligerent states to develop ET technologiesforeitheroffensiveor defensivepurposes.• NaziGermany’s elites survived the war in remote locations in Antarctica andSouthAmericaandwouldplay acontinuedrole inregional/worldaffairs.

140

The foundationsfor globallymanagingETaffairs afterthe

Second WorldWarwere anumber of policiesbased on the lessons learned from theSecondWorld War era. There is considerable evidence to suggest that the majorAlliedpowersofthe US, USSR, Britain,andFrancehave“cooperated” inobservingandimplementing these global management policies despite powerful rivalries anddiverginginterests.Much ofthecooperationbetweentheUSandtheUSSRwas duetotheshared perception of the need to cooperate in dealing with the ET presence and thecontinuedNazi bases,andthe profound lessons learnedfromNaziexperience when amajorstateembarkedon military adventurismbasedon its confidencethatit coulduseETtechnologyforoffensivepurposes.

Inspiteofdesiredand necessaryglobalcooperation,itwasnotpossible primarilybecause of ideological differencesbetween theWestern and Soviet bloc nationsconcerningtheirvisionsof howto best organizesociety,andthe planet.Thismeantthateach bloc, respectively led by theUSand USSR,was simultaneously cooperating toeffectivelyrespondto the ETpresenceand existenceofNazi bases,while competing tomax-imize their respectivezonesof influencearoundtheplanet.

The USand USSRtook the lead in creating thepolitical, military and economicstructures thateach ideological bloc would use in dealingwith its own members, andwith therivalbloc ofnations.Each ideologicalbloc would dealwith thevarious pol-icyissuesemergingfromtheexistenceof ETracesandtech-nologiesusingthe structuresitsetupspecificallyfor dealingwith this issue.

However,eachbloc would cooperate incoordinating policyon the ET presence through the regular summit meetings between their political leaderships and thechannels of communication established by their respective military and intelligencecommunities.

Eventualrecognitionof thePeoplesRepublicof China as aPermanent member oftheSecurityCouncilin 1972,signifieditsemergenceasamajor statethat would also playa significant role in globally managing ET affairs by asserting a regional zone ofinfluenceinpursuingandacquiringETtechnologyandrespondingtotheETpresence.Indeed,theassertionof

141

completeChinesecontrolover Tibet from1959,suggeststhattheUSandothermajorpowersrecognizedChina’ssphere ofinfluenceover Tibetwhich,basedon evidenceofNazi expedi-tions,hadsignificantETartifacts.253

Thereislittleevidencethatthe non-AlignedGroupofnationsthatemerged in the1960splayeda significantroleingloballymanagingETtechnologyandtheETpresence.Basedonthe institutionalstructures,relationships,andcooperativeagreementsreachedby the Allied powersin dealingwith ETtechnologyandtheET presence around theplanet,fivemainpoliciesadoptedby theAllied powersfor globallymanagingETaffairs.

1.Non-Disclosureof ExtraterrestrialAffairs

Non-disclosuretothegeneralpublicandmostelected officialsof the majoralliedstates,wouldbe enforceduntil some time in the future whenpolicyconsequences of the ETpresenceandETtechnologywereclearly determined.

In the caseofthe US, PresidentRoosevelt adopted thedecisionfor non-disclosureafter theUSconfirmed thereality of the ET presence andof ET technology. This waslaterinstitu- tionalizedby the TrumanandEisenhoweradministrations in amanner thatwouldallowthe non-disclosureto be continuedforan indefiniteperiod.254

Eachof theWesterndemocraticnationsplayinga promi-nentrole in the globalmanagementsystemset upto dealwithET affairs,wouldformtheirowninstitutionalstructuresresponsible forcoordinating ET policies and ensuring non-disclosure.255Eachofthe nationalgovernmentswouldgiveallETrelatedprojectsandinformationasufficientlyhighsecurityclassificationto makeit afederal/nationalcrimeformilitaryand intelligence officials to come forward to reveal their participation in projects concerningtheETpresenceandtechnology.256

Thiswould be a highly effective means for restricting public debate and mediainvestigationof ETrelated issuesasevidencedbythecontinuedmediablackoutoftheETpresence.257

142

Success of the strategy of non-disclosurerequiredstrictenforcement of national security laws, and pressure on other states not privy to allaspects of ET affairs, to turn over any information, artifacts or technologies in theirpossession tooneor more of themajorpowers in accordto the spheres of influ- enceinitially set outat the February1945agreement at Yaltabetween Franklin D. Roosevelt,WinstonChurchill, andJosephStalin.

TheYaltaagreement is significantsinceit notonly estab- lishedspheresof influencefor dealingwith the territories liber- ated by the Allies, but it was also likely to havesanctionedanon-disclosurepolicy of theETpresenceandtheNazi-ETcon-nection.Thissuggested the Allied stateswouldcooperate to ensure that ET affairs would remain anationalsecurityissue,with severe penaltiesfor disclosure bypublicofficials.In thecaseof theSovietblocof nations,andlaterChina,evenmoredraconiannationalsecuritylawswere set in placeto ensurenon-disclosure.Eventhebravestof thosepublicofficials whowereawareofgovernment/military projects concerning ET technology and the ETpresence,cooperatedin thepolicyofnon-disclosure.

National political leaderships of states not playing a prominent role in globallymanaging ET affairs, were only sufficiently informed of theETpresence, in order todelegatethemattertotheirrespectivenationalsecuritybodies.Itappears thatincaseswhere ET artifactswere discovered, ET craft landed or retrievals of craft occurred,and/orwhereETcontactoccurred,thesewould bedealtwith through thenationalsecurityorgansof the state thatwouldcooperatewiththemajorstatesthathadinfluenceover thehostnation.

The secret global recovery system operating for countries in the US sphere ofinfluence is called “Project Pounce.” Colonel Steve Wilson, a former leader of thisclandestine group of specialists from different branches of theUSmilitary revealed theactivitiesof this secretProjectina seriesof interviews:

Project Pounce isan elite group of AirForce BlackBerets and military scientistswho rush to the scene of any UFO crashes, cordon off the area, retrieve theextraterrestrial

143

spacecraft and any occupants, then“sanitize”thecrashsite back to its pre-crash appearance, and intimidate any outside witnesses intosilence.258

Inan interview,a formerArmy/CIA officer revealed havingwitnessed inasecret

USbase,ET“craftwehavepickedupandcapturedindifferentpartsoftheworld.”259 Morepossibleconfirmationofa secretglobalrecoverysystemcomesfromDr.JamissonNeruda,260 who claims to be a defector from a clandestine organization embeddedwithin the NationalSecurityAgencyorganization thatspecializes in ETcommunica- tionand technology; he describes the circumstances surrounding the retrieval of an ETpilotedcraft discoveredbyhisfatherin1956,who he claims servedintheBolivianArmy:

My father discovered a damaged spacecraft in the jungles of Bolivia during ahunting trip. It was a triangular vessel about seventy meters from end-to-end, nearlyequilateral . . . My father recovered a specific technol-ogy from the ship,andthencontacted a military officialwithin theBoliviangovernment that wasatrustedfriend.Initially,my fatherwas interested in selling thecraft to the Bolivianmilitary, but it quicklybecame aconcern of theU.S.military—specifically theSPL[Special Projects Laboratory]. A director from the SPL met with my father,ascertainedtheship’s location,andperformeda completesalvageoperationinthespanofthreedays.261

ThevictoriousAllies thatformedthe UnitedNationsandwhoseprincipalmembers

became the permanent membersof theUNSecurity Council, would cooperate inensuring non-disclosure of the ET presence to their respective general publics andothernationalgovernments.Thissuggestedthat theUnited NationsSecurity Councilprovidedan important forum for thepermanent members tocoordinate their respectivenational policies on ETs and also ensured non-disclosure of the ET presence and/ordiscoveryofETtechnology.

144

2. Non-Disclosureof the ET-NaziConnectionandCounteringNaziInfluencein SouthAmerica

The ET connection with Nazi Germany, and the survival of the Nazi elite in remotelocations in Antarcticaand SouthAmericawould not be disclosed to the general publicandmost elected public officials by those national governments aware of the Naziexodus.

This was to ensurethat therewouldbeno reemergence of theNazi ideology as thebasis ofnew nationalgovernmentany-wherein theworld,andof Nazi elitescapturingamajorstatefor promotingtheirNazi beliefsystems.This posedconsider-abledifficultiesin South Americawhere many governments had strong pro-Nazi sentiments and hadprovidedmaterial support and safe havens for the Axis powers. Countries such asArgentina, Paraguay, Chile andBrazil were carefully watched due to strong pro-Nazisympathiesamongpoliticalelites,andpotentialforthese statesto be vehiclesfor thespread ofNazism/FascismintheSouthAmericancontinent.262

Indeed,muchoftheColdWarstruggle thatoccurred throughout SouthAmericawas an effort to contain the spread of Nazism/Fascism and the need to rein in theinfluenceofNazienclavesthatinfluencedgovernmentsinthiscontinent.Thefear wasthat South America could one day become a vehicle for a renewed effort by theremainingNazielitesforregional,ifnotglobal,domination.TheColdWarstruggleinSouthAmericawas a covertmeansfor theUSandUSSRtominimizethe threat posedbythe escaped Nazielite,byexhaustingSouthAmericanstatesin aseriesofpoliticalandeconomiccrises.263

These perennial crises would ensure that no SouthAmericanstate could everachieve thekind of economic potential thatwould enable it to develop the industrialcapacityandtechnologicalbasethatwouldprovidetheNazi elitea vehiclefor achievingaleadershiprole in regionaland/orworld affairs.For example,the 2002decisionby theInternationalMonetaryFundnottoprovideadditionalfundstoArgentina,ledtoaneasilypredictable economic meltdown that resulted in the clos- ing of banks, cut back ingovernmentservices,andrapid

145

increaseinunemployment.264 Rather thanthis beinga result ofdifferentmacro-economicphilosophiesby theBush administra-tion as comparedto theClinton administration, it may be suspected that the real reason was to denyArgentinatheresourceswith which it couldplay a majorpoliticalrolein theregion.

Thefinal resultwouldbe the denialof an increase in thepowerof Nazi eliteswhocontinue to exert a powerful behind the scenes influence over the Argentine politicalsystem and other states in South America. Significantly, the individual in charge ofestablishingColdWar strategyinLatinAmericadur-ing theTruman administrationwasNelsonRockefeller,who was latersecretlyappointed byEisenhower to takecharge ofETaffairs.2653.Repatriationof NaziScientists/TechnologiesandContinuingNaziSponsoredMindControlProjects

All ET inspired technology left by Nazi Germanywas divided among the victoriouspowersoftheUS,Britain,France,and theSoviet Union intermsofwho had possessionofthetechnologyorscientistsin theirrespectivezonesof controlin OccupiedGermanyandformerNazioccupiedterritories.EachAlliedstate incorporated this technologyintotheirrespectiveclan-destinemilitaryeffortsaimedat weaponsdevelopment andintelligenceacquisition.

Eachof the majorAlliedstates had its own version of “Operation Paperclip,” inwhich theUSsponsoredthe removalofNaziscientists to the US, even incases wheretheyhadstrong pro-Nazi records thereby violating USimmigration laws.266 Theseeffortsof recruiting Nazi scientistswere distin-guished by the continuation of manyNazi sponsoredprojectsintheUSandUSSR.

Theexpatriationof formerNazi scientistswasparticularlyimportantin a numberofareasin which theNazis usedslavelaborand/orunwilling humansubjects in testinganddevelop- ing advanced “behavior modification” and mind control techniques.267 Restrictionson such experiments in theUSand otherdemocratic nations meant thatthese Naziscientistshada

146

“wealthof experience” that could not beeasilyreplicatedintheUS andelsewhere.Mostnotoriousof these Nazi Scientistswas JosefMengele who,contrary to common perceptions of living in exile in South America, reportedly participated in and/or led clandestine USmind control projects such as MK-Ultra andProjectMonarchthatinvolvedseverehumanrights abuseson childreninparticular.268

ProjectMK-Ultrawas subject to a review by theUSSenate’s Select Committee onIntelligence which examined the abuses committed in the behavior modificationprogramsusedby thegovernment/militaryagenciesinvolvedinMK-Ultra.269

Areas ofspecialinteresttoWesternnationsawareoftheETpresenceweregeneticandmind control experiments aimed at optimizing human performance in extremeconditions. These experiments weresecretly continued in theUS and other formerAllied statesfor thepurposeof bioengineering“supersoldiers”whocoulddisplay thekindofgeneticandmentalqualitiesforextremelyhighmilitaryperformanceinouterspace, and for advanced time/interdimensional travel technology. Testimonies offormer participants of these experiments suggest that many of these former Nazisponsoredgenetic andmind control programs were indeed used for producing “supersoldiers.”270

One individual who claims to have been a participant of these genetic and mindcontrolexperiments, Andy Pero, gave an interview revealing the background of theseexperimentsinwhich he was involved:

After WW2 manyNazi scientistswere brought over to the US through our ownIntelligence community who formerly worked in mind control research in theconcen- tration camps. I believe they are a remnant of the Nazi partyworking inconjunctionwith differentbranchesoftheUS government and themilitary. Muchof my training and torture sessions were done right at theUniversity ofRochester,NY.They usedtotakemetoaprivateroomintheatticor topfloor of thelibrary. Thebiglab where I hadmostof the programming done tomewasat theRomeNationalAirBasein Rome,NY.

147

Ihavealsobeen usedin the MontaukchairwhileatCampHero, Montauk,L.I.andalso in a chair inAtlanta,GA atDobbinsAirForceBase ...

The trainerswould putme into a trancewhereby I’d be told I could jump off aladderof minimal height. Inmymind, I believed that I was only jumping off afootstoolor a shortledge.Inactuality,I was progressivelyledtojump higherandhigherheights tothepointof success- fullyjumpingoff buildings and even out ofplaneswith-outa parachute. Whenundermindcontrol, I coulddowhatever Iwasinstructed to do as longas Ibelieved them. I would do200 or more push ups inperfectform,sometimesas longas a halfhourstraight,or until Iwastoldto stop.Iweight lifted545 lbs.ona barbellandsquats while attending college and much more (500–1500 lb.) while I was under the mind control in the traininglaboratorynot farfromRochester,NY.271

Other areas ofexperimentation involved psychometricweapons development

andexperimentsworkingwithtime/dimensionaltravel.272Anumberof participantsinthese highly secret projects sponsored by intelligence and military branches ofgovernment have comeforwardto give testimony of these projects. PrestonNichols,claims tohavebeena formerdirec-torofone ofthese projectsandhastestifiedto theuse of children, the homeless and other unwilling human subjects in continuing thesesecretexperiments.273HeoutlinedthehistoryofMontaukProjectas follows:

Overtheyears,theMontaukresearchers perfectedtheirmindcontrol techniquesand continued to delve further into the far reaches of human potential. Bydevelopingthepsychic abilities of differentpersonnel, iteventuallygot to the pointwhere a psychic’sthoughtscouldbeamplifiedwith hardware,and illusions couldbemanifestedbothsubjectivelyandobjectively.Thisincludedthe virtualcreationofmatter.All ofthiswasunparalleledinthehistoryofwhatwecall“ordinaryhuman

148

experience”butthepeoplewhorantheMontaukProjectwerenotabouttostop.Theywouldreachevenfurtherintotherealmof theextraordinary. Once it was discovered thata psychiccouldmanifestmatter, it wasobservedthatitcouldappearatdifferenttimes,dependingonwhatthe psychicwasthinking.Thus,whatwouldhappen if apsychicthoughtofabookbutthoughtofitappearingyesterday?Itwasthislineofthinkingandexperimentationwhichledtotheideathatonecouldbend time itself.Afteryearsof empirical research,timeportalswereopenedwith massive and outrageous experiments beingconducted.274

Ina report released on theMontaukProjectand its flagrant violation of thehuman

rights of participants in the experiments, John Quinn, who believes he was also anunwilling participantin these,refersto the roleplayedby a prominentpsychiatristbasedat McGill University and the Allen Memorial Institute in Montreal, Canada during the1950sand1960s:

[Dr Ewen]Cameron,whohadmadenosecret ofhisslaveringadmiration for themonsters andbutchers ofBergen-Belsen and indeed for the entire Nazimove-mentinall aspects,rightlyviewedhispsychoticandbrutal “work”for the CIAandotheragenciesasacontinuationofthe experimentscarriedoutbytheNazisupon theirmillionsofhelpless human victims.Circumstantial evidence and anumber ofpersonalaccountsindicate thatsimilaroperations were in factalsobeingconductedonLongIsland,probablyatCampHero, Fort PondBayNavalBase in Montauk, and at Brookhaven Labs during this time period, perhapsinvolving EwenCameronhimself.275

Thesponsorshipof humanperformanceenhancingexperi-mentsandmindcontrol

wasadopted bymajorgovernmentsinterestedinapplyingtheworkofNaziScientiststofuturerequire-mentsforhumansinspaceconditions,time/interdimensional

149

travel and possible conflict with ETraces.276Theseexperimentscontinue todayandremainamong the mostclassifiedprojectsdeveloped bymajor statesthat globally managetheETpresence,ETtechnologyandlegacyofNaziGermany.277

4.ManagingExtraterrestrialArtifactsFoundaroundthePlanet

All ET artifactsfoundaroundthe planetwouldbe broughtunderthecontrolof oneormoreof the“victoriouspowers”ofUS,Britain, theSovietUnion,andFrance.This meantthat,inspiteofthepost-wardivisionoftheglobeintodifferent“spheres of influence”agreed to at Yalta,mostif notall ETtechnologywouldeventuallyfind its way into theclandestinemilitaryprogramsofthe US,Britain,the SovietUnionandFrance,or wouldatleastbemonitoredby thesemajor states.

Withthe emergence ofmainlandChinaasapermanentUNmember,thismeantthatitwasalsowasrecognizedashavinga legitimatesphereof influencewhereinit couldworkto access, control and/monitor discovered ET artifacts.Maintaining the principleestablished at Yalta in 1945 to carve up the planet into different spheres of influencewouldhelpensurethattherewouldbe noproliferationofETinspiredtechnology,sinceamajor powerwould berecognizedashavinglegitimacyto covertlyintervene,controland/ormonitorETartifacts.

This would helpminimize chances of a repeat of the Nazi experience whereby adiscontentedregionalpowercoulduseET technologyforweaponsdevelopment, andembark on a program of regionalmilitary domination thatwould once again threatenpeaceandstabilityina regionor theglobe.

This fundamental principle of globally managing ET affairs was particularlyimportantin thosepartsof the planetwhereancientcivilizations existedandwhere ETartifactswere likely to be hidden in inaccessible or yet to be discovere dareas.Regionssuch Tibet, Egypt, Iraq, Afghanistan, Indochina, South and Central America,and elsewherewere all highly valued assets due to the potential ET artifacts possiblylocatedinthese countriesandregions.Globalcooperationamong

150

the US and USSR and other permanent membersof theUNSecurityCouncilmembersin responding to the ET presenceandgainingaccess toETartifacts,yieldedtointensestrategiccompetitionforcontrolofthese territoriesandtheirhiddentreasures.

TheColdWarideologicalconflictmaskedthe veryrealstruggleforeachmajor statetomaximize itspowerintermsofthe technologicalbreakthroughsET artifactswouldprovide.There is evidence that the currentwar in Iraq is but the latest example of aregionalmilitary conflictwhoseultimateprize isETartifacts that would impact on thetechnologicalprogramsofthemajor statesmanagingETaffairs aroundtheplanet.278

ThesplitbetweenNATOmembersFranceandGermanywith theUS andBritain overthe legitimacy and timing of the military intervention in Iraq, suggested that afundamentalrealignmentinmanagingETaffairs hadoccurredwith FranceandGermanysidingwithRussia andevenChina,inwantingtorestrainthe US. This suggested thatthepost-SecondWorldWarcooperationformanagingET affairswasunderseverestrain,and that very real tensions lay underneath the polite language of internationaldiplomacy.279

5.CooperatingtoEndtheNaziThreat

The majorpowerswouldcooperatein respondingto the challenge posed bothby theremnants of Nazi Germany in their hidden military bases in Antarctica and SouthAmerica;andtothe one ormore ET races thathadcontinued to assistNazielites.Thiscooperation was marked by agreements to not disclose this information to theirrespectivegeneralpublicsor tomostelectedpoliticalofficials.

What surely most troubled Allied officials was the success of the Nazi elites todevelopfullyoperationalsaucercraft thatwerepropelledby antigravitygeneratorsandnavigationalsys-temsthatstillhadnotbeensuccessfullydevelopedby theUSandUSSRas mentionedby Col. Corsoin an interviewreflect-inghistime inservice (heretiredfrommilitaryservicein1963).280 ThisNazisuccessoccurred wellbefore the Alliedstateswereabletodeveloptheir own fleetsofsaucerships.

151

AccordingtoCol.SteveWilson,“thefirst successfulU.S.

antigravityflight tookplaceon July 18, 1971atS-4dreamland[Area 51] wherein light bending capabilities were also demon-strated to obtain totalinvisibilities.”281A numberofmilitarywhistleblowerssuggestthattheUScurrentlyhasafleet of ET reverse engineered ships with antigravity propulsion systems and thatmannedflights totheMoonandevenMars areregu-laroccurrencesbythe clandestineorganizationsdevelopingandusingsuch technology.282

IfWilson’sdate anddescription are accurate, it suggests that theUS hadreached asimilar technological stage with the Nazis, who presumably had achieved thistechnological feat sometime towards the end of the Second World War. This wasevidenced by the appearance of the legendary Foo fighters,which bewilderedAlliedairmenonbombingmissionsoverGermany.283

Afteranexhaustive studyofthisphenomenon, Britishresearcher Mark Birdsallconcluded: “Withoutquestion, nearlyall Foo-Fighter andGhostRocket reportscan becategorized asadvanced technology channeled from . . . various secret GermanWWIIscientificfacilities.”284 Thissuggests thatasignificant technological gap divided theUS/USSR fromthe NazielitewhoescapedtoAntarcticawiththeirprizedtechnologicalassetsand informationderivedfromtheir occult communicationswithETraces.

The presence of a significantly well-armed and undefeated Nazi presence inAntarctica and SouthAmericawould be kept from the general public and most electedofficials.Such anon-disclosure policyis evidencedby the secrecysurroundingthetruegoalsof Admiral Byrd’s Antarcticmission in 1946/47, andsubsequent conflicts in theAntarcticandSouthAmerica.The level of secrecyevenfor seniorpolitical officials canbegaugedby comments from formerCongressmen such as SenatorBarryGoldwaterwho servedas Chairmanof theSenateIntelligenceCommittee.Inresponsetoa questionby a UFO researcher he stated: “This thing [ET/UFO affairs] has gotten so highlyclassi-fied ...itisjust impossibletogetanythingon it.”285Goldwaterwas likelyreferringto the procedure applying to waived Special Access Programs whereby the chairs ofCongressionalDefense

152

and/or Intelligence committees, atbest,wereverballyinformedof the existence of a particular“deep black”projectwithout being givenanyspecificdetailsofit,andwere notallowedtodiscussitwith othercommitteemembers.

The superiorETinspiredtechnologyachievedbyNazirem-nantsthatallowedthemtocontinuetomaintainremotebaseswouldsurelyhavedisturbedthe USandUSSR. Thishelpsunderstand the basisof the cooperation between the majorWesternpowersandtheSoviet Union and its satellitestates,togloballymanagethe existenceofET racesandtechnologythroughouttheColdWar era,andtohidethetruthaboutthethreatposed byremnantsofNaziGermany.286Conclusion:GlobalManagementSystemfor ETAffairs andtheLegacyof theNazi-ETConnectionThemanagement system designed by the Allied powers to deal with ET affairs,includingthelegacyof theNazi Germany-ET connection, is based oncircumstances thatstemdirectlyfrom theSecondWorldWar.The desirenot todisclosetheexis-tenceofsignificant Nazi bases in Antarctica and elsewhere was understandably based onperceptionsbythe leadershipsofAllied statesthat this would lead to disclosureof theETassis-tancereceivedbyNaziGermany.

Due to the potential of this for disclosure of the ET pres- encemore generally, apolicy thatbecamea foundationfor theglobalmanagementof ETaffairs aftertheWar,the truth about the Nazi bases would not be disclosed. Furthermore, the fact that Nazibases in Antarctica could not be militarily defeated suggested both the technologicalsuperiorityofNazi weapons,andthe likelihoodthattheycontinuedto receiveassistancefrom oneor moreETracespreventingtheeradicationofNazibases.

Givenglobalpublicperceptions of “complete victory” in the Second WorldWar,the Allied governments did notwant their respective national publics to learn of themajorstrategic

153

defeat suffered by the Allies with thesuccessfulestablishmentof a Nazi presencein AntarcticaandSouthAmerica,and theNazi-ET connection. Thiswouldmeanthatthese technologi-callyadvancedNazi enclaveswould posea directthreattothemilitaries ofmajor world governments.

Perhapsmoreimportant:coreNaziprinciplessuch as elitistdecisionmaking,eugenicsandmilitarism, would bea threatto“democratic”values aroundtheglobe,and how ETaffairsweretobegloballymanaged.

The chief legacyof theNaziGerman-ETconnectionis thatNazi enclavescontinuetoinfluencea key regionof theplanet,SouthAmerica, leading to numerous politicalandeconomiccrises in thatcontinentwhich continuestoseriouslyimpactthe lives of SouthAmericancitizens.

Moreover, a number of researchers claim that Nazism continues to covertlyinfluencegovernmentpolicyat the highestlevelin countriessuchastheUS andRussia,and, to a lesser extent,Britain and France, through the Nazi scientists expatri- ated intothose countries after the Second World War. These former Nazi scientists assumedprominent leadership positions in the clandestine projects to develop ET inspiredtechnolo-gies.TheseprojectsbecameTrojanhorsesfor Nazi principlesandbeliefsbothin government and corporations, that fulfill numerous contracts to service themilitaryandintelligencecommunitiesintheUS.

This is especiallythe case in projects that involve“mindcontrol” and “genetic” experimentsthatutilizeET inspiredtechnologiesfor a variety of purposesthatarenottransparentandare abusiveof the rightsof humansubjects.There is evi-dence thatNaziinfiltration through the “Trojan horse” of for-merNazi Scientists into the military-industrialcomplexesthatoverseeETaffairsisso significant as toconstituteadirectthreattodemocracyandliberty intheUSandothermajor powers.

ThereisaneedforfulldisclosureofETaffairsingeneral,inorder to make it possible for humanity to make the transition to the reality ofextraterrestrial life, and the political issues that arisewith dealingwith ET affairs.Notonlyethicalandpoliticalprinciplesmotivate full disclosure, but also significant nationalsecurityprinciplesare at stake.Theverysurvival of

154

the US as a bastion of liberty anddemocracy—keyprinciplesestablishedby thefoundingfathersof theUS—are atstakeifclandestineprojectsdealingwith ETaffairs andthecontinuedNaziinfluence,are notplacedunderthe supervisionoftheappropriatecongressionalandexecutivecommitteesthataretransparent in theiroperationsandreports.287

A fullCongressionalinquiryintothetrue circumstancessurrounding the escape of Nazi elites and establishment of bases in Antarctica andelsewhere, by the US Congress and similar parliamentary bodies of other nations, isimmediatelyrequired.

Such official inquiries are needed to make the public more aware of how Naziprincipleshaveinfiltratedintothekeynationalinstitutionsresponsiblefor managingET affairs,andthe threat thisposesto democraticvaluesandinstitutions.Evidenceforinfiltration ofNaziprinciplesinto thekey decisionmakingbodieson ETaffairs isgivenbywhistleblowerssuch asDr. MichaelWolf, whoclaimsthat“withinthe UFO Cover-Upthere is adark,covertrenegadeorganizationknownasthe‘Cabal’.Hedescribesit asa “well-orchestratedconspiratorialbevy of plotters. . . top-heavywith themilitary, and headed by (a Navy Under-Secretary).” He claims that the“paranoiacCabalworksagainst,anddeliberatelyundermines,thegoalsofpeacefulnegotiationswith theextraterrestrialvisitors.”288

At a globallevel,there is a similar threat thatkey institutions that manage ETaffairshavebecomeinfiltratedbyNazielitesand/orNaziprinciples.Itisimperativethat thepublicbecomes fully informed of the varietyofET races in existence, theiractivitiesandagendas. It is also imperative to identify those races that have been mostactivein supportingthe Nazi eliteand theiractivitiessince the end of the SecondWorldWar.

Although achieving transparency in thefull range o factivities, agendas andmotivations of ET races are extraordi- narily complex, it is certainly worthinvestigating why one ormoreETraces assisted in the development in theNazi’sadvancedtechnology,andmay beplayinga role in theexpan-sion of Nazi principlesinthenationalandglobalmanagementofETaffairs.

155

Thereremainsthedangerofanunnecessarymilitary

confrontation with ET races who, it is claimed in the majority of whistleblowertestimonies,demonstratelittlehostileintentto globalhumanity,andindeedhavethusfardemonstratedremarkableresilienceinnotretaliating against attacks fromclandestinegovernment organizations.289 Delay in addressing the influenceof Nazi elites and/orNazi principlesintheglobalmanagementof ETaffairs may result in a seriesof eventsthat have tragic consequences for the sovereignty and freedom of humanity forgenerationstocome.

Notes

207.Iamgreatlyindebted tomy good friend,Dr. JohnKing, whogra-ciously allowedmeto usehis holidayhomefor thewritingof thischapter,an earlierversionof which was publishedas “FoundationsforGloballyManagingExtraterrestrial Affairs—TheLegacyoftheNaziGermany-Extraterrestrial Connection,” Study Paper #6: www.exopolitics.orgJuly 27,2003.208. For discussion of historical UFO sightings, see Richard Dolan, UFOs and the National Security State:Chronology of a Cover-up (Hampton Roads, 2002) pages 1–3; and Jim Marrs, Alien Agenda: Investigating theExtraterrestrialPresenceAmongUs (HarperPaperbacks,1997),pagesxxvi–xxx.209.Fordiscussion ofNazi expeditions, see Christof Friedrich, SecretNazi polar expeditions (Samisdat, 1976); Christopher Hale,Himmler’s Crusade: The Nazi Expedition to Find the Origins of theAryanRace(John Wiley& Sons, 2003). For an online article onNazi Expeditions toAntarctica, see “The AntarcticEnigma”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind1.htm.210.Foronlinereferencesto NaziGermany’srecoveryofanET craftsometimein1937–38,seeRobert K.Les´niakiewicz, “The U FOCrashes in Poland”: http://www.notizieufo.com/pol5.htm; and “The Omega File: NaziHistory”: http://www.think-aboutit.com/Omega/files/omega3.htm.211.SeePeterLevenda,PeterLavenda,NormanMailer, Unholy Alliance:Historyofthe NaziInvolvementWiththeOccult(ContinuumPubGroup;2nd edition,2002);Trevor Ravenscroft,Spearof Destiny (RedWheel, 1987); andNicholas Goodrick-Clark, The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and Their Influence on NaziIdeology:TheArisophistsofAustria andGermany,1890–1935. For an onlinearticle

156

http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind1.htm

http://www.notizieufo.com/pol5.htm

http://www.think-aboutit.com/Omega/files/

on Hitler and theOccult, see“Hitler, German NaziBeliefs and Tibet”:http://www.geocities.com/okar_review/hitlertibet.html.212.See HelenaPetrovnaBlavatsky,TheSecretDoctrine:The SynthesisofScience,Religion, and Philosophy,Vol.1&2(TheosophicalUniversityPress, 1999).213.Fordiscussionofthese technologies see HenryStevens, Hitler’sFlyingSaucers:AGuide toGerman FlyingDiscsoftheSecondWorldWar (AdventuresUnlimitedPress,2003);Gary Hyland&AntonGill,Last Talons of theEagle:SecretNazi TechnologyWhich CouldHaveChangedtheCourseofWorldWar II (HeadlineBook PublishingCo.,2000). For online discussion of these technologies, see “Secrets of the Third Reich”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart1.htm.

214.“SecretsoftheThird Reich”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart2.htm.215. See Joscelyn Godwin, Arktos: The Polar Myth in Science, Symbolism, and Nazi Survival (AdventuresUnlimited, 1996). For an online article on Hitler and theThule Society, see “Hitler, German Nazi Beliefs andTibet”:http://www.geocities.com/okar_review/hitlertibet.html.216.“SecretsoftheThird Reich”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart2.htm. Fordiscussion ofanti-gravity technology see David Hatcher Childress, ed., Anti-Gravity and the Unified Field (AdventuresUnlimited, 1990); and Nick Cook, The Hunt for Zero Point: Inside the Classified World of AntigravityTechnology(Broadway Books, 2003).

217.“SecretsoftheThird Reich”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart1.htm.




221.Marrs, AlienAgenda,p. 27.222.Foronlinereferencesto NaziGermany’srecoveryofanET craftsometimein1937–38,seeRobert K.Les´niakiewicz, “The U FOCrashes in Poland”: http://www.notizieufo.com/pol5.htm; and “The Omega File: NaziHistory”: http://www.think-aboutit.com/Omega/files/omega3.htm.223.Quotedin“SecretsoftheThird Reich”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart3.htm.

224.RobinCollyns,DidSpacemenColonisethe Earth?(PelhamBooks,1974)p.236.Alsoquotedin“SecretsoftheThirdReich”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart3.htm.

157

http://www.geocities.com/okar_review/hitlertibet.html

http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/

http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/

http://www.geocities.com/okar_review/hitlertibet.html






http://www.notizieufo.com/pol5.htm

http://www.think-aboutit.com/Omega/files/


http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart3.htm

225.Dan Sherman,Above Black:Project PreserveDestiny, Insider Account

of Alien ContactandGovernmentCover-up(OneTeamPublishing,1997).Available onlineat: http://www.aboveblack.com.226.Foran article claiming that Nazi Germanyhad reachedan agreementwithaReptilianETspecies, see“TheNazi-UFO Connection”:

http://www.angelfire.com/ut/branton/nazi.html://www.angelfire.com/ut/branton/nazi.html.227.Fordiscussion ofET races described to be hostile/malevolent to human society, see chapter four. Firstpublished as “Responding to Extraterrestrial Infiltration of Clandestine Organizations Embedded in Military,IntelligenceandGovernmentDepartments,”Study Paper#4(May30,2003)www.exopolitics.org.228.Fordiscussionoftherole ofUScorporationsinassistingin theindus-trializationof Nazi Germany,see CharlesHigham,Tradingwith theEnemy:AnExpose ofthe Nazi-American Money Plot, 1933–1949 (Doubleday Press,1982); AntonyC. Sutton,Wall Street & the RiseofHitler(GSG&Associates, 1976).Foranonlinearticle, see“DocumentedEvidenceof a Secret BusinessandPoliticalAllianceBetweentheU.S. ‘Establishment’andtheNazis,Before,DuringandAfterWorldWar II,up tothepresent”:http://thewebfairy.com/nwo/.229.For discussion of the inequities of the Versailles Peace Treaty, seeMichael Salla, The Hero’s JourneyTowardASecondAmericanCentury(PraegerPress, 2002).230. Charles Higham, Trading with the Enemy: An Expose of the Nazi- American Money Plot, 1933–1949(DoubledayPress, 1982).Foronlinereference,see:http://thewebfairy.com/nwo/standard.html.

231.John Costello,TenDaystoDestiny: TheSecretStoryoftheHess PeaceInitiative and BritishEfforts toStrike aDeal WithHitler (Quill,1993).232.Richard Boylan,“QuotationsfromChairmanWolf,”in BoylanandBoylan,LaboredJourneyToTheStars.Availableonlineat:http://drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html.233.Personalinterviewof Colonel’sBrophy’ssonby Dr Richard Boylan, “Air Force Colonel’s Son Reveals1940s U.S.-UFO/Star Vis it o rEncounters,” UFO facts, July 21, 2003: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UFOFacts/message/10345.234. See George Morgenstern, Pearl Harbor, The Story of The Secret War (Cossta Mesa, 1991); see alsodiscussion of events surrounding the entry of the US into the Second World War by controversial Britishconspiracytheorist,DavidIcke, AndTheTruthShall SetYouFree,pages118–22.

235.Quoted in JuliusPratt,A HistoryofUnitedStatesForeignPolicy(PrenticeHall,1955)p. 638.236. For discussion of Hitler’s efforts to avoidUS entry into the War, see Michael Salla, The Hero’s Journeytowardsthe SecondAmericanCentury,pages147–149.

158

http://www.aboveblack.com

http://www.angelfire.com/ut/branton/nazi.html


http://thewebfairy.com/nwo/

http://thewebfairy.com/nwo/standard.html

http://drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html

http://groups.yahoo.com/

237.“SecretsoftheThird Reich”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/

secrets/secretspart2.htm.238.For extensivediscussionof suchan exodustoAntarcticaandSouthAmerica,see JoscelynGodwin,Arktos: ThePolarMyth in Science,Symbolism,andNaziSurvival;JimMarrs,AlienAgenda,pages107–13; and also see Branton, TheOmega Files; Secret Nazi UFOBasesRevealed (Inner Light Publications,

2000).Availableonlineat:http://www.think-about-it.com/://www.think-about-it.com.239.RichardK.Wilson andSylvan Burns, “SECRETTREATY: TheUnitedStatesGovernmentandExtra-terrestrialEntities. Available online at: h t t p : / / w w w . f o r t u n e c i t y . c o m / r o s w e l l / p r e d i c t i o n / 5 1 / text-files/secret.txt.240.Forextensivediscussionofthe advancedtechnologyleftbyNaziGermany,see “Secrets oftheThird Reich”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart1.htm.241.FordiscussionofhowseniorNazibegan transferringfundsandresourcesthroughSouthAmerica,seeMarrs,Alien Agenda,pages107–113.

242.Seethe“AntarcticEnigma”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind2.htm.

243.“AntarcticEnigma,”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind2.htm.244.“AntarcticEnigma,”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind2.htm.

245.Fordiscussionof Nazi developedSaucersbeingwitnessedduringthepost-WorldWarperiod,see“Secretsof the Third Reich”:

http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart3.htm://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/sec246.“The Antarctic Enigma”: http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind2.htm.ForfurtherreferencestoOperationHighJump,seeBranton,TheOmegaFiles.Availableonlineat: http://www.think-aboutit.com/Omega/files/omega3.htm.

247.“TheAntarcticEnigma”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind2.htm.248. For reference to Nazi expeditions to Antarctica in the pre-war period, see “The Antarctic Enigma”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind2.htm.Thepossibilitythatthe Nazishad“discovered” under-groundbasesinAntarcticasuggeststhatthe ThuleSocietyhadindeedbeensuccessfulinestablishing communications withanancientsubterraneanraceofhumansfromlongdead surfacecivilizations.249.See“TheAntarcticEnigma”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind2.htm.For furtherreferencestothis battle,seealso Branton,TheOmegaFiles.Availableonlineat:http://www.think-aboutit.com/Omega/files/omega3.htm.250.Quotedinan interview ofAdmiral Byrdby Lee van Atta, “OnBoardtheMountOlympuson theHigh Seas,”ElMercurio(Santiago,Chile,

159


http://www.think-about-it.com

http://www.fortunecity.com/roswell/prediction/51/





http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart3.htm





http://www.think-aboutit.com/

March5,1947). See“TheAntarcticEnigma”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind2.htm.251.RichardByrd,The Missing DiaryofAdmiral RichardByrd(Inner LightPublications, 1992).Admiral Byrd’s

Diary is available online at: http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/byrdiar.html://www.v-j-enterprises.com/byrdiar.html.252.SeeRaymondW.Bernard,TheHollowEarth:thegreatestgeographical discoveryin historymadebyAdmiral Richard E. Byrd in the mysterious land beyond the Poles—the true origin of the flying saucers (BellPublishingCo.).For online discussionofETsight-ingsinAntarcticaregion, see“AntarcticEnigma”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/ind2.htm.253. For the CIA’s involvement in the Tibetan uprising and subsequent abandonment of Tibet, see RogerMcCarthy,Tearsofthe Lotus:Accountsof Tibetan Resistanceto theChinese Invasion, 1950–1962 (McFarland &Company,1997).For an accountoftheNazi-Tibetcon-nection,see PeterMoon,TheBlack Sun:Montauk’sNazi-TibetanConnection—MontaukSeries, Bk.4(SkyBooks, 1997).

254.For analysisof USnon-disclosurepolicy, seeChapterTwo. SeealsoGreer,Disclosure;&Dolan, UFOs andtheNationalSecurity State.255.For discussionof the institutionalstructure of theUS, seeChapterTwo. SeealsoGreer, Disclosure;& Dolan,UFOsandthe NationalSecurity State.256.For a detaileddiscussionof a globalcover-upof theETpresenceandtechnology,see TimothyGood,AboveTopSecret:The WorldwideUFOCoverup (AcaciaPress, 1989); and Dolan, UFO’s and theNational SecurityState.

257.For discussionof themediablackout,seeTerryHanson,TheMissingTimes (XlibrisCorporation,2001).258.RichardBoylan, “TheMan Who“Outed” the U.S. SaucerProgram:ColonelSteveWilson,”inBoylanandBoylan,LaboredJourneyToTheStars.Availableonlineat:http://www.drboylan.com/colbirb2.html.259. Linda MoultonHowe, “UFOs and EBEs:More Insider Evidence,”Nexusmagazine (August-September, 1998):http://www.nexusmagazine.com/ufosebes.html.260. [Authors note:] The actual existence of Dr. Jamisson Neruda as a defector from a clandestine NSAorganizationis controversialandisalmostimpossibletoverify.There is a possibilitythat‘DrNeruda’is used as apseudonymfor someonewho actuallydoes filla positionsimilar tothat described byNerudawho is part of anacclimationpro-gram approvedby senior officials.Anotherpossibility isthat theweb-siteisdisinformation. Theextensive information on the website, ostensibly created by Dr. Neruda (www.wingmakers.com), hasphilosophicaldepth, coherence,clarity, detailandconsistencywith

160


http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/byrdiar.html


http://www.nexusmagazine


othersources,and leadsme toconcludethat itisnot disinformation.Despitequestionsovertheactual existence ofaDr.JamissonNeruda,I believemuch of thewebsitematerialisaccurateand worthreferencingas a valid source.

261.“NerudaInterviews”:http://www.wingmakers.com/neruda3.html.262.Sourceson Nazismin SouthAmericancountriesinclude:RonaldC.

Newton,TheNaziMenaceinArgentina,1931–1947(StanfordUniversityPress,1992;UkiGoni,YukiGoni,TheRealOdessa:SmugglingtheNazis toPeron’sArgentina(GrantaBooks, 2002);andGraemeStewartMount,Chileand theNazis:From Hitler toPinochet(BlackRose Books, 2001).263.Foranaccountofclandestinesubversiveoperationsbysix LatinAmericanintelligenceagenciesinfluencedby the CIA, see John Dinges, TheCondor Years:How Pinochet and His Allies Brought Terrorism to ThreeContinents(NewPress, 2004).264.Foranonlinedescriptionofthe ArgentineFinancialCrisis,see“A RichCountryGoesBust Again:ThoseWhoRuinedArgentina,”World Press Review(March2002):http://www.worldpress.org/americas/0302observateur.htm.265.ForacriticalaccountofNelsonRockefeller’slinkswithNazismandhowthiseffectedhisleadershipoftheCold War struggle in Latin America, see “Rockefeller: A Traitor For President”:http://home.att.net/~m.standridge/rocky.htm. Foramoreneutralonlinedescriptionof theColdWar strugglein

Latin America, go to: http://www.csupomona.edu/~jmvadi/454/The ColdWar.html://www.csupomona.edu/~jmvadi/454/The%20Cold%20War.html.266.For detaileddiscussionof ProjectPaperclip,seeLinda Hunt, SecretAgenda:The UnitedStatesGovernment,Nazi Scientists, and Project Paperclip, 1945 to 1990 (St Martins Press, 1991); andClarence G. Lasby, ProjectPaperclip:GermanScientistsandtheColdWar(Scribner1975). ForonlinediscussionofOperation Paperclip,see“SecretsoftheThird Reich”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart2.htm.267. For an overview of Nazi mind control experiments, see Ron Patton, “Project Monarch: NaziMind,” TheConspiracyReader:FromtheDeathsof JFK andJohnLennonto Government-SponsoredAlien.Available onlineat:http://www.aches-mc.org/monarch.html.268.Ron Patton,“ProjectMonarch:Nazi Mind,”The ConspiracyReader,pages197–213. Available online at:http://www.aches-mc.org/monarch.html.269. For the Select Committee’s reportwhichwas released by a nFOIA request by John Greenewald, see“Project MKUltra:TheCIA’sProgramofResearch inBehavior Modification,” JointHearing Before theSelectCommitteeonIntelligenceandtheSubcommitteeonScientificResearch,August3,1977.Available

161

http://www.wingmakers.com/neruda3.html

http://www.worldpress.org/americas/

http://home.att.net/~m.standridge/

http://home.att.net/~m.standridge/

http://www.csupomona.edu/~jmvadi/454/The%20Cold%20War.html


http://www.aches-mc.org/monarch.html

http://www.aches-mc.org/

onlineat:http://www.blackvault.com/documents/remoteviewing/hearing/hearing0.htm.270. A number of interviews of these Super solider experiments are available online at:http://www.hostileinvader.com/CampHero.html. For discussion of Mind-Body technology, see Thomas Beardon,Excalibur Briefing: Explaining paranormal Phenomena, the interaction of mind and matter (Cheniere Press).Availableonlineat:http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/index.html.271. Interview with Andy Pero, “Project Superman”: http://www.hostileinvader.com/ProjectSuperman.html.Foraninterviewwith“Jared,” anotherindividualwhoclaimsto havebeen programmedasasupersolder,see EveLorgen,“Secret ProjectSuperWarriorGoneRogue”Alienlovebite(August,2001).Availableonlineat:http://www.alienlovebite.com/secret_project_super_warrior_gon.htm.272. For discussion of these various technologies and how they were conducted at the famed MontaukAirforce/Navalfacility, see PrestonNichols,MontaukProject:Experimentsin Time(Sky Books,1999);AlBielakand Brad Steiger, The Philadelphia Experiment And Other UFO Conspiracies (Innerlight Publications, 1991);Stewart Swerdlow, Montauk: The Alien Connection (Expansions Publishing Co., 2002); Wade Gordon, TheBrookhaven Connection (SkyBooks,2001). Foronline interview withAl Bielak, go to: http://psychicspy.com/montauk1.html. Foronline reference to time travel,seeRichardBoylan, “Colonel SteveWilson,USAF (ret.)RevealsUFO-orientedProjectPounce”:http://www.drboylan.com/swilson2.html.273.For extensivediscussionon theuse ofchildrenintheseexperiments,seeJohnQuinn,“PhoenixUndead: TheMontauk Project a n dCamp Hero Today,” (NewsHawk Inc, 1998). Available online at:

http://vs03.tvsecure.com/~vs030f1/monew.htm://vs03.tvsecure.com/~vs030f1/monew.htm.274.PrestonNichols&PeterMoon,Montauk:Explorations inCon-sciousness(SkyBooks,1995). Availableonlineat: http://psychicspy.com/montauk1.html.275. John Quinn, “Phoenix Undead: The Montauk Project and Camp Hero Today,”(NewsHawk Inc, 1998).Available online at: http://vs03. tvsecure.com/~vs030f1/monew.htm. For further discussion o fDr.Cameron and other prominent mind control “specialists,” seeRon Patton, “Project Monarch: Nazi Mind,” TheConspiracyReader,pages197–213.276.Forhistory ofmind controlexperiments, seeJim Keith,Mind Control,World Control (Adventures UnlimitedPress,1999); see alsoJohnMarks,The Searchfor theManchurianCandidate: The CIAand MindControl(NortonandCo., 1991).277.Fora reportdetailingwithhow theseexperimentscontinueup tothepresent,see JohnQuinn,“PhoenixUndead:TheMontaukProject

162

http://www.blackvault.com/documents/remoteviewing/

http://www.hostileinvader.com/CampHero.html

http://www.alienlovebite.com/secret_project_super_warrior_gon.htm


http://www.drboylan.com/swilson2.html

http://vs03.tvsecure.com/~vs030f1/monew.htm

http://psychicspy

http://psychicspy

http://vs03

andCampHero Today,”(NewsHawkInc, 1998). Availableonlineat:http://vs03.tvsecure.com/~vs030f1/monew.htm.278.ChapterFivediscusseshowIraqpossessesETartifactsthatliebehindthe2003 USled military interventioninIraq.279.For discussionof theshifting alliancesinmanagingtheETpresence,seeChapterSix.280.Quotedin“SecretsoftheThird Reich”:http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/secrets/secretspart3.htm.281.Quoted in RichardBoylan, “Colonel Steve Wilson, USAF (ret.) Reveals UFO-oriented Project Pounce,”availableonlineat:http://www.drboylan.com/swilson2.html.282.SeeRichard Boylan,“Quotations fromChairman Wolf,” in Boylan and Boylan, Labored Journey To TheStars. Available online at:

http://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html. See alsoRichardBoylan,“SecretAirForceMach-50Plane, Other Exotic ClassifiedAerospacecraft,Andthe U.S.AntigravityFighterDiscsDeployedWith StarWarsWeapons To FightIn the Gulf War,” in Boylan andBoylan,LaboredJourneyToTheStars.Availableonlineat:http://www.drboylan.com/xplanes2.html.

283.JimMarrs,Alien Agenda,pages 95–97, andDolan,UFOsandtheNationalSecurity State,pages5–11.

284.QuotedinMarrs, AlienAgenda,p. 114.285.Marrs, AlienAgenda,p. 201.

286.For anaccountof US-Sovietcooperationin dealingwith UFOs,seeLindaMoultonHowe, “UFOs and EBEs:More Insider Evidence,” N ex usmagazine (August-September, 1998): http://www.nexusmagazine.com/ufosebes.html.287. For an extensive discussion on how US foreign policy has evolved in terms of the key principles ofdemocracy,liberty andrule of law,seeMichaelSalla,TheHero’sJourneyToward theSecondAmericanCentury.288.Interview withDrRichardBoylan, “Official WithinMJ-12 UFO-Secrecy Management Group RevealsInsiderSecrets,”availableonlineat: http://drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html.289.For discussionof thebenevolentintentionsofETs,seeStevenGreer,ExtraterrestrialContact:TheEvidenceandImplications(CrossingPointPublications,1999); andRichard BoylanandLeeK. Boylan,Close ExtraterrestrialEncounters:PositiveExperiencesWithMysteriousVisitors(Wildflower, 1994).

163



http://www.drboylan.com/swilson2.html

http://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html

http://www.drboylan.com/xplanes2.html

http://www.nexusmagazine

http://drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html

Chapter4

ExtraterrestrialInfiltrationofClandestineOrganizationsEmbeddedinMilitary,Intelligence

andGovernmentDepartments

Introduction290A growing number of individuals who have served in military, intelligence orgovernmentinstitutionstestifytothepresenceof extraterrestrial(ET)racesthatcompeteamongthemselvesandwith clandestine(human)organizationsfor influenceoverglobalhumanity.291 Dr.StevenGreer hasgathered the testi-moniesof more than100of thesewitnessesin writtenand/orvideoformat,andmade these available for the generalpublicandfora congressionalinquiry.

He claims a further300 areready to comeforwardto give testimony, ifgiven legalprotection from prosecution for violating their secrecy oaths.292 The clandestine organizations aregroups of individualsembedded within the intelligence andmilitaryservicesofdifferentnationalgovernmentswhoserole istodealwith all issuespertainingtotheETpresence.

The differentETracesspan the entirespectrumfrom non- interventionist ones thathaveaphilosophybasedon not inter-feringwithhumanfreewillwheninteractingwithandinfluencingindividuals,organizationsandsocieties;to “inter-ventionist”racesthat intercede in human affairs. These do not necessarily respect human free will formotivations that rangefrom a “self-serving” desireto “harvest” the resources of globalhumanity, to analtruisticdesire to assistglobal humanity i ndeveloping to its highestspeciespotential.

164

Themostcrediblesourcesprovidingevidenceofthese

clandestine organizations and the different ET groups are “whistleblowers” thatparticipatedin variousclandestinemili-tary/intelligenceprojects.293 Anotherimportantsourceareindi-viduals who have directly experiencedcontactwith differentETfactionsand/orhavebeenunwilling subjectsofclandestine/ETprojects.294

These former participants in projects run by clandestine organizations havetestified to therelationships betweenhumanity and various ET races in terms of thelatter’s motivations, activities andmoral philosophy, and the alliances they form with“clandestine organizations” embedded within intelligence and security forces thatinterfacewith differentETraces.The natureof thesealliancesappeartobevery fluid intermsofhowETs andelites interface,and the variouselites thatcome to thepinnacleoftheseorganizations.

Itappearsthata strugglebetweendifferent factionsof ETswhoshare interventionistandnon-interventionist approaches to human affairs have been reflected in the variousclandestine organizations that interface with them and dictate global policy. Thesefactionaldifferencesappear bothin termsof the rela-tionshipsbetweentheseclandestineorganizations,andalso intheinternaldynamicsofclandestineorganizations.This chapter describes the dynamics of the interactionsbetween clandestine organizations and various ETraces.Emphasis willbeon describing the differentinterventionphilosophiesandactivitiesof ET races,and in identifyinghowthis impactsthedecisionmakingandorganizationalstructureofclandestineorganizationsembeddedwithinmilitaryandintelligencedepartmentsof theUSandothernationalgovern-ments.

Finally, the chapter will finish by describing the extent to which clandestineorganizationshavebeeninfiltratedby differ-ent ET factionsand the threat this poses tothesovereigntyofhumanity.

Evidenceused in framing theanalysis provided in this chapter is primarily drawnfromthe testimoniesof participantsinclandestinegovernmentorganizationsthatserveasthe

165

strongest evidentiary source for analysisof theETpresence.295All of these individuals participated in“blackprojects” thathave the highest securityclassificationsin the US andothercountries,andcarry severepenaltiesfor divulgingtothegen-eral public.

Thefactthatmanyof thesewitnesseshavebeen abletomakethesetestimoniespublicinvarious lectures,videos,web-sites orbooks,suggestthatan “acclimationprogram”isoccur-ringwherebythegeneralpublic isbeingpreparedfor themoredisturbingaspectsofthe ET presence.296 Therecommenda-tionsmadeat the conclusionof thischapterare designed to assist in developing an adequate response to the infiltration ofclandestineorganizationsby variousETfactions.UnderstandingtheDynamicsof Interactionbetween DifferentETfactionsandHumanityThecontroversialSumeriantranslator,ZechariaSitchindescribesin great detailthe nature of the struggle between two factions ofETswhom theSumerianscalled theAnunnaki.297He describes how this ET race provided the biological material for the geneticengineering of the human species thatwas created out of a fusion of the biologicalmaterialofprimateswiththegeneticmaterialof this ETrace.298

Sitchindescribeshowthe factionledby the ET/godEnlilwas self-serving towardsahumanity thatwas basicallyviewed as an expendable resource created to provide avarietyof resources for use by theAnunnaki.The otherETfaction led by theET/godEnkihad a farmorealtruistic viewofhumanitychar-acterized byadeep affection thatwasorientedtowardsthedevelopmentofhumanityas a species.

TheancientSumerianfactionalstrugglebetweenETs overhow humanitywas to beviewedandtreatedisreflectedin themythologicalbelief systemsof later civilizations andtheir respec-tive warringpantheons.This suggeststhattheancient“warofthegods”isanarchetypaleventthathas been longembeddedinthecollectivehumanconsciousness fromracialmemoriesofanintensehistoricalconflict betweendifferentETfactions.299

166

Thehistoricalconflictbetweendifferent ET factionshas

most often been given expression in a dualist moral framework in which these ETfactionsor“gods” are respectivelyeither“benevolent”or“malevolent”in motivationandactivities.IntheSumerianrecords,thegodEnlilcouldcertainlybeviewedashavingamalevolentorientationtowardshumanityasopposedtohisbrotherEnkiwho hadabenevolentattitude.

Thisis certainlythe scenario described bySitchin inhis translation of the “greatflood”where Enlilcommandedthathumanityshouldnotbe forewarnedof thegreatflooddue tothebeliefthathumanitywascorruptandexpendable,asopposed toEnki whoforewarnedthemostenlightenedmem-bersofhumanity,Utnapishtim/Noah.300

Asimilarstory appears in theancient Greek myth of Prometheus and ZeussuggestingthatafactionalconflictbetweenETs overhowto interact with humanitywasdeeplyembeddedinthecollectiveunconsciousofhumanity.

Inthereligiousarenathisperceivedfactionalstrugglebetweenthecreatorgodsofhumanityhas givenrise todualis-tic religionssuchas ZoroastrianismandManicheaismwhere asupreme god ofLight is locked in a great cosmic struggle against a god ofDarkness.InJudeo-Christian-Islamictradi-tions,thisstruggleis depicted in termsofthe confrontation between two competing angelic hosts led respectively by thearchangelsMichaelandLucifer.

The apocryphal Book of Enoch comesclosest todescribing the ET originsof thisreligious struggle in howthe rebelliousAngels/Nephilim ledby‘Semjasa’corrupted the Earth,andhowtheywere expelled by the Archangel Michaeland hisangelichost,while theEarth was purgedby thegreatflood.301

A dualisticmoralframework, however, is notanaccuratebasis for understanding ET efforts to influenceand/or control human affairs throughallianceswith clandestineorganizations.The complexity of the ET interactions described by different sourcessuggests that a more multifaceted dynamic between different ET factions exists, andsimple moral categories such as benevolent/good and malevolent/evil aremisleading.Forexample,accordingto JamissonNerudawhoclaimsto be adefectorfrom a clandestineorganizationembeddedwithin the

167

NationalSecurity Agency, for a numberofETraceswithmultipleagendas thatare intervening on theplanet,simplemoral categories are insufficient tofullyunderstandtheconsequencesoftheir activitiesandinfluence.302

Consequently,a “triadicframework”thatdoesn’t usemis-leadingmoral categoriesis necessaryso as tomoreaccuratelyreflect thedynamicsof theways ETs interactwithone another, the rules of intervention that are set and observed by ET races, and the“politicalphilosophies”of theseETraces.

Themainfactorsinfluencingthe dynamicsofthis three-pronged ET influence arethe interventionistphilosophiesoftheseracesintermsof respectinghumanfreewill,thedegree towhich theET“politicalphilosophy” dismissesor accepts the idea that humanshavereached thenecessary“speciesmatu-rity”toevolveandflourishwithoutbeingcontrolledbyadvancedET races;andthe degree to whichET interactionwith humanityisself-servingfrom theperspectiveof theETsorservingtheinterestsofhumanity.

These factors give rise to three models that will be used to describe the maincharacteristicsofhowETs controland/orinfluencethedevelopmentof humansocietiesandclandestineorganizationsthatinterfacewiththeET races.Thesemodelsarethe“goodshepherd,”“protectiveparent”and“wisementor.”

AlthoughthelistofETracesdescribedinthefollowing cat-egoriesisnotexhaustivewhencomparedtosomeof theclas-sificationsystemsthatare circulatingon the internetby thoseclaiming tobecommunicatingwithor “channeling”ETraces,itdoes coverthemostsignificantracesin whistleblowertesti-monies,whoseinfluenceismostfeltinthepolicymakingprocess.The “GoodShepherd”ETsET races that have an interventionist approach, share a “pessimistic” view in theirassessmentofhumanity’s“speciesmatu-rity,”andare self-servinginmoralorientation.Theycanbeviewedintermsoftheanalogyofthe“goodshepherd.”“Good

168

shepherd”ETsholdviews similar totheshepherdtendingtoaflockofsheep.

The sheep and shepherd have different intrinsic valuewhereby the right of theshepherd to usetheirflock astheypleaseisacceptedby theshepherdas self-evidentandanatu-ralpartof existence.Thereisthereforeno moral reservationon the shepherd’spartin controllingandusingtheirsheepasaresource.

The “good shepherd” may develop an affectionate relationship with somemembersoftheirflock,especiallythosewhoexhibitqualitiesprizedbythe shepherd suchas intelligence or physical appearance. These “members of the flock” may begenerouslyrewardedfor their prizedqualitieswith thebestfeedingpasturesandmatingopportunities,butlessendowedmembersof theflockareviewedas little more thananexpendableresourcethatservesthe interest of the goodshepherd and theircommunity.For the shepherd, it is incon-ceivablethatthe“sheep”couldbeexpectedtotendtothem-selves since they could be stolen and/or exposed to predators, thereby diminishing theshepherd’sresourcebase.

If the“goodshepherdanalogy”isextendedtohumansitcanbe concludedthat“goodshepherd”ETs haveaspartoftheir belief systemtheviewthathumansaretoo“immature”asa speciestobeallowedtodevelopwithoutbeingclosely scru-tinizedin howhumanitygoverns itself and uses the planet’s resources. The overly pessimistic view of humannatureleadstothe desireto controlhumaninstitutionssothat“good shep-herd”ETracescanmonitorandlimit the evolutionarygrowthofhumanityinorderto“harvest”humanityand/orthebiosphere(Earth)as a renewableresourceforETraces.

According to Sitchin’s translations of Sumerian cuneiform texts and variousreligious traditions, there is evidence supporting a biological connection betweenhumanityandthe“goodshepherd”ETs, andthefact thatthelatterplayeda key role inthecreationor bioengineeringof thehumanrace.The “goodshepherds”correspond in theSumerianrecordsto the Enlilfactionof theAnunnaki.

In terms of the different ET races described by whistleblowers, the “goodshepherd” ETsincludethe Graysfrom

169

Zeta Reticulum, TallGrays (from Orion),Reptilians (Earthbased),Draco-ReptiliansfromOrion, and theAnunnaki (giant humanoidsfrom Nibiru).303

The mostcommonstrategyusedby “good shepherd”ETs to exercise control overhumanity is to create the illusion of “wolves” in the form of dangerous individuals,organizations or other contrived threatswhich allows individuals and communities todelegate their sovereign power to political institutions. This essentially duplicates thepoliticalprocessdescribedbythe17thcenturyEnglishphilosopher,ThomasHobbesinLeviathan,whereindividualsina “stateofnature”(an anarchical/lawless environment)will surrender their individual sovereignty to a sovereign ruler in order to protectthemselvesfrom poten-tialaggression,theftandrape.304

Similarly, good shepherdETs create sufficient“illusionarywolves”who threatenlawand order,topersuade individuals tosurrender their individualsovereignty topowerfulpolitical insti-tutions.Authorssuch asDavid Ickeargue,forexample,that the9/11attackson New York andWashington were effectivelyanattempt todepict Islamicterrorists as “wolves” in order to scare the global general public to surrender morefreedomtogov-ernmentauthorities.305

Subsequently, “good shepherd”ETs enter into a collection of “Faustian bargains”with politicaleliteswho directlybenefitifthey agreetocooperatewith theseETracesincontrollingallsectorsof nationallife: political,religious,economicandmili-tary.306Sucha “Faustian” process is alluded to in the writings of ancient historians such as theManethowhochronicledthe30humandynastiesinEgyptthatemerged afterthe gods/demigodssurrenderedtheir directrule over humanity.307

The motivation of these human elites is similar to collabo- rationists in occupiedcountries. They see themselves as simply recognizing political reality and getting onwith life in the hope that conditions improve in the future. Historical agreements/alliances between human elites and “good shepherd” ETs have been the subject ofinvestigationby conspiracytheoristssuchas JimMarrs andDavid Icke.308

The “good shepherd” faction of ETs has three sub-groups that are strategiccompetitors,butalso cooperatetominimize

170

the influence of the other two dominantET factionsthatarededicatedtotheevolutionof thehumanspecies.The first aretheEarth based“Reptilian”ETswho havebeenhiddenon theplanetformillennia,and have managedhumanityas aresourceinawaythatdoesn’t depletetheplanet’sresourcesandthreatenthe integrityofthebiosphere.309

Strictly speaking, this sub-group is not extraterrestrial, but is an advanced non-humanoidracethatinhabitssubterraneanrealms.Someauthors claimthis Reptilian/non-humanoidraceinhabitedtheEarth’s surfacelongbeforehumanitybuthad toabandon the surface after severe environmental catastrophe and/or interplanetary warfare. Thewell-knownjournalist,LindaMoultonHowe,interviewedanindividualwhohada remark-ableencounter with a group of these “Reptilian beings,” and reveals some significantfacetsaboutthisancientrace and theirapproachas “goodshepherds”:

I understoodbetter theirnature andagenda.They areneitherbenevolentnor evil.They havebeenamongus in secret for thousands of years,maybe longer.But thelengthof time isn’t as much the issueas why they havebeenamongus. I believethey have been farming us for raw materials. We humans have been a self-perpetuating crop, a crop that doesn’t need much tending and continues toreproduce,atleast up tonow ...Thankgoodnessthey don’tkillus;they justuse us.

This system has worked well for the aliens for a long time. But now there’s aproblemandtheirinvestmentis in trouble.They havespenta lot of time,travelandeffort to farm us. But we are on an almost irreversible path of self-destruction.Nuclear and biologicalweaponsandtheirwastehavepollutedthe air, landandwater.Forests, jungles and trees are being cut down or are dying. Now there arebreakdownsin thefoodchain andtherestof thefood chain iscontaminated. Over-popula-tion,diseaseandvirusesbeyondourgrasp,with newandmorecomplicatedillnessescroppingup every day.Theseare just a few of theproblemswe humanshavecreated.310

171

ThisEarth basedReptilian race,duetoitslong presenceon

Earth and efforts to restrict humanity’s more destructive ten- dencies, has historicallyacquiredthemyth of being a “guardian race.”311 In the Gothic architecture of manyEuropean cathe-dralsandAmericanbuildings, one canwitness the numeroussculpturesof “Gargoyles”thatsymbolizea protectiveforceinhumanity’sviolenthistory andsearchfor religioustruth.312

This sub-group thereforepartly corresponds to theEnki faction of the Anunnakidescribedby Sitchin.It doesnotwish toshare controlof the humanracewith otherETracesandtriestopreventoff-world ETintervention(which constitutesa threattoEarth basedReptilians’ ability tomanage humanity) by assistinghumanity in dealingwith arangeofproblemssuch astheenvironmentaldegradation,thethreatof nuclearwar, andoverpopulation—all of which threaten the resources of this sub- group of “goodshepherds.”

This sub-grouptherefore assistsin the developmentof aone-worldgovernmentthat centralizes political power andrestrictshuman sovereignty and freedom withouteliminating it altogether. Giving credence to this scenario, Phil Schneider, a civilengineer contracted to build secret underground facilities for clandestine organizations,describedtheevidenceheencountered thatETswouldbethetruerulersof a oneworldgovernment. This is why he andmany others left the“service”of US-basedclandestineorganizations.313

A second sub-group of the “good shepherd” ETs are an off-world race that hasenteredintoagreementswith clandes-tine organizationsinwhich advancedtechnologyisexchangedfor the right to establisha presence on the planetand to col- laborate onjoint ET/humanprojects.

A secret Treatysignedin 1954between the Eisenhoweradministration andanETracehasbeen disclosedby WilliamCooper and other “whistleblowers.”314 Coopernarrates the events surrounding this Treaty from classified documents he had to readwhenheservedin NavalIntelligenceaspartofthebriefingteamtotheCommanderof thePacificFleet:

[I]n1954 theraceof largenosedGrayAlienswhichhadbeenorbitingtheEarthlandedatHollomanAirForce

172

Base. Abasic agreementwas reached.Thisrace identifiedthemselves as originating from a Planet around a red starin theConstellation ofOrion whichwecalled Betelgeuse.Theystatedthat their planetwas dying and thatatsomeunknownfuture timetheywouldnolongerbeabletosurvive there.This ledto a second landing at Edwards Air Force Base. The historical event had beenplanned in advance and details of the treaty had been agreed upon. Eisenhowerarrangedtobe in PalmSpringsonvacation.On theappointedday thePresidentwasspir-itedaway tothebaseandtheexcusewas giventothepressthat he wasvisitinga dentist.PresidentEisenhowermetwith the aliensanda formal treaty between theAlienNationandthe UnitedStatesofAmericawassigned.315

Alludingto the sametreatysignedbythe Eisenhoweradministration,Col.Phillip

Corso,ahighlydecorated officerwhoservedin Eisenhower’sNationalSecurityCouncil,wrote:“We hadnegotiateda kind of surrenderwith themas longaswe couldn’t fightthem.They dictatedthetermsbecausetheyknew what wemostfearedwas disclosure.”316

The technology exchange directly aids the development of highly advancedweapons systems thatUS-based clandestine organizations desire in order to maintaininfluence, to contend with and limit the ET presence, and to compete against oneanother for strategic advantage around the globe. This sub- group is typicallydescribed as comprising “smallGrays”fromZetaReticulumand/or “tallGrays” fromOrionwhodesire tousethe resourcesof humanityandthe biosphere for reestab-lishingthegeneticintegrityof their race.

Accordingto Col.Corso,the Grays“weren’t benevolentalien beingswho had cometoenlightenhumans.They . . .wereharvestingbiologicalspecimens on Earth for theirown experi-mentation.”317Thissub-grouplooselycooperateswith thefirstsub-groupin encouragingthe developmentofacentralizedworldgovernmentthatwouldenterintoagreements with thissub-group where it couldbetter utilizehuman and planetaryresources.

173

Thefirstsub-groupdesiresaoneworldgovernmentbecause

ofthe greater efficiencyit providesfortheirmanagementofglobalhumanity.Thesecondsub-groupdesiresitsince itismoreconsistentwiththeirphilosophical beliefthat theinterestsoftheindividualaresubsumedby theneedsofthecollective.

The third sub-group comprises two races that share a more pessimistic viewconcerning human capabilities for being in charge of the planet’s resources.Historically theyhaveformedanallianceincontrollinghumanity.Thefirstisaverylargehumanoidracethatisdescribedinthebookof Genesisas theNephilim(literallygiants)whoimpregnatedhumanfemaleswho thengavebirth togiants.318

This raceisreportedtooriginatefrom theconstellationofLyraandinhabitsthemysteriousplanetNibiru(Sumerianfor‘planet of crossing’) that, according to Sitchin’s translations of Sumerian documents,returnsevery3,600yearstothis vicinityof thesolar system.319

Thesecondraceis describedasa ReptilianspeciesfromtheDracosystemofOrionwho aregeneticallyrelatedtoEarthbasedReptiliansbut aremoredominantand advancedtechno-logically.320The two racesof this sub-groupcorrespondtotheEnlilfactionoftheAnunnaki describedbySitchin inhis transla-tionsof Sumeriantexts.This sub-groupof“good shepherd”ETs is very hierarchical in nature and views the domination of onespeciesover others as being themost natural and efficientway of managing planetaryresources.

Their racialworldview is very similar to thatheldin NaziGermanyand itisarguedthat this“good-shepherdsub-group”assistedsomeoftheelites ofNaziGermanytoescapefrom thealliedinvasionto Antarcticaandotherregionsinthe SouthAtlantic, wheretheyestablishedsecretbases.321

The self-serving agenda of this third sub-group of “good shepherd” ETs is toencourage militaristic responses among different clandestine organizations thatdestabilizeglobalhumanitybychannelingresourcesandinfluenceintothemilitary-industrial complexes of different nations, causing these clandestine organizations tooverextendthemselvesby spark-ingovertmilitary conflictwith theGray ZetaET race(secondsub-groupof“goodshepherd”ETs).

174

Such a scenarioisevidentinCol.Corso’srevelationthatfor

“over fiftyyears, now, thewar againstUFO’s[Zeta Grays] has con- tinuedas we tried todefendourselvesagainsttheir intrusions.”322AnescalatingmilitaryconfrontationbetweenZeta ETsand clan-destineorganizations couldeventuallyculminatein interven-tionbythe third sub-groupof “good shepherd”ETs—Draco Reptilians/Giant humanoids who correspond to the Enlil faction of theAnunnaki.

The interventionby Anunnaki-Enlil factionof “goodshep-herdETs”wouldoccurasglobalenvironmental upheavalsand/ormilitary conflictwith the Zetasoccur to theextentthatthis providesthese two ETracestheopportunityto interveneas “saviors”ofhumanityandthe“returningElohim.”323

Withthe advanced holographic, timetravelandshapeshiftingabilities thathavebeenreported tobelongtothis ETrace,itcouldcontrivea “SecondComing”comprisinga genetically manufactured “Jesus” accompanied by the “AscendedMasters” and the“Angelic Host” that would be celebrated by religious adherents as the start of theKingdomofGod.324Posingas saviors,these two alliedETraces,DracoReptilians/gianthumanoids,wouldessentially take over a weakened global humanity after a series of catastrophic environmentalandmilitaryeventsandusherin an“eraofpeace” under aunited worldgovernmentwhoseleadershipisovertlycon-trolledbythissub-groupofthe “good-shepherd” ETs. Theywould be helped by the other two losing “good shepherd” sub-groups in preventing other ET factions from assisting global humanity in itspredicament.

Ingeneral,ETsinthe firstandthirdsub-groupsofthe“goodshepherd” categorydesirenon-disclosure ofthe ETpresenceandgo to great lengthsto intimidate,silenceandeliminate individuals who have participated inclandestineorganizations fromrevealing the full extent of their activities. Themain goal of all sub-groups in the“good shepherd” ET category is to “harvest” the resources of humanity withoutcomprising the integrity of the biosphere and ET control over the evolution of globalhumanity.

Thusthe moralorientationofthe “good shepherd” ETingeneralisanalogoustothehistoricalwayinwhich

175

colonial governments dominated andassimilatedindigenouscommunities. Although the three sub-groups of the “good shepherd” faction arestrategic competitors over who exercises control over global humanity, they share acommoninterestinrestrictingthe sovereigntyandindependenceofthe humanspeciesso that it can be used as a global resource. The first two sub-groups (Earth basedReptilians&ZetaGrays) wouldlosesomeoftheirinfluencein controllinghumanityifthe DracoReptilians/Giant Humanoidsweretoassumeoutrightcontrolofhumanity, buttheywouldloseevenmore oftheirabilitytoinfluenceandcontrolhumanityif the nextETfactionweretointervene.Thismotivatesa loosealliancebetweenthesethreesub-groupsof the“goodshepherd”ETfaction.ProtectiveParentETsThesecondanalogyto be usedto describe the motivationsandactivitiesof a distinctcategoryof ETracesis the“protec-tiveparent”model. The“protective parent”ETcategorywishes toshield humanityas an “adolescentrace”as faras pos-sible fromthedangers thatexist for humanityasamaturingrace.ETs in this category havea moralorientation of helpinghumanity become aware of the presence of other ET racesthroughoutthegalaxy andtocooperatewith theseracesin anallianceoftendescribedbywhistleblowersandothersourcesas theGalacticFederation.325

The Galactic Federation depicted in the Star Trek series is a fairly closeapproximation of how these ET races are organized. There is a respect for thesovereignty of humanity and a desire to help humanity unite and integrate advancedtechnologyinorderforittobereadyforaccessiontotheGalacticFederationasexplainedby Jamisson Neruda, who claims to be a defector from a clandestine organization embedded inthe NationalSecurityAgency:

Each galaxy has a Federationor loose-knitorganizationthatincludesallsentientlifeformsoneveryplanetwithinthe galaxy.It wouldbe the equivalentoftheUnitedNationsof thegalaxy. ThisFederationhas both

176

invitedmembers and observational members.Invitedmembers are those species that have managed to behave in a responsible mannerasstewardsoftheirplanetandcombineboththe technology, philosophy,andculturethatenablethemto communicateasaglobalentitythathasa unifiedagenda. Observational members are species who are fragmented and are stillwrestlingwithone another over land,power, money,culture,anda hostof otherthings thatprevent themfrom forming a unifiedworld government. The humanraceon planetearth is such a species,andfor now, it is simply observed by theFederation,butis notinvitedinto itspolicymakingandeconomicsystems.326

TheseETracesdonot enterinto agreements for providingadvanced technology

forweaponsprogramsbyclandestineorganizations.Thisplacesthemata considerabledisadvantageto“goodshepherd”races.Ithas beenrecorded, for example,thata meetingbetween President Eisenhower and representatives of these races in 1953 (before the1954Treatywith theZeta/OrionETgroup)did not lead toan agreementsince theseETracesbelievedhumanitywas too immaturefor thetechnol-ogy desired;and that nuclearweaponry, for instance,shouldbedestroyed.327 WilliamCooper describes in somedetailtheeventssurroundingthismeeting:

In themeantime a raceof human lookingalienscon- tactedtheU.S.Government.Thisalien groupwarnedusagainst thealiens thatwere orbiting the Equator [thosewhoEisenhower eventuallysigned aTreatywith] andofferedto helpus with ourspiritual development. Theydemanded thatwe dismantle anddestroyournuclearweaponsasthemajorcondition.Theyrefusedtoexchangetechnologycitingthatwewerespirituallyunableto handlethe technologywhich wethenpos-sessed.Theybelievedthatwewould use anynew tech-nologytodestroyeachother.

Thisrace statedthat we wereon a pathof self destructionandwe muststopkillingeachother,stoppollutingthe

177

Earth, stop raping the Earth’snaturalresources,andlearnto live in harmony.Thesetermswere metwithextreme suspicion,especiallythe major condition of nuclear disarmament. It was believed that meeting thatcondition would leave us helpless in the face of an obvious alien threat . . .Nuclear disarmament was not con- sidered to be within the best interest of theUnitedStates.The overtureswererejected.328

The protective “parent ET” racesspend considerable time assisting various human

organizationstocountertheagendasof“goodshepherd”ETracesthatareactively tryingtocontrolglobalhumanityfor thepurposeof harvestingtheresources ofhumanity andthe planet. This category of ETs promotes an agenda of full disclosure of the ETpresence, and is dedicated to serving the best interests of humanityasviewedfromthelens ofa “protectiveparent”thatservedas abiologicalsourceforhumanity.329

Thus the“protective parent”ETscorrespondmoreclosely to the Enki factionof theAnunnakidescribedin Sitchin’stransla-tions ofSumeriancuneiformtexts.Someof theETraces that fall into this category are typically described as the Nordics (Lyra), Sirians(SiriusB),Pleiadians,Altairians, and Alpha Centaurians.330

Twosub-groupscanbe identifiedinthe testimoniesofthosehavinghadcontactorwitnessed evidence of ETs in theProtectiveParent category. The first is an on-worldpresenceofhumanoidracesthathavehistoricallyassisted humanity in itsevolutionarydevelopment.Such a racehasbeenarguedby anumberof authorstobetheremnantsoftheancientLemurianandAtlanteancivilizationsthatestablished largecrystallinecitiesinsidethe Earth’scrustafterabandoning theircities/civilizations established on theEarth’ssurface.331

In asecretiveflightto the Artic Ocean in 1947,AdmiralRichardByrd reported inhisdiary—whoseveracity continues tobe debated332—of hisencounter withanancienthumanoidraceina subterraneancityundertheNorthPole:

The radioman and I are taken from theaircraft and we are received in amostcordialmanner.Wewerethen

178

boarded on a small platform-likeconveyancewithnowheels!Itmovesus towardthe glowingcity with greatswiftness. Aswe approach,thecityseemstobemadeofacrystalmaterial.Soonwe arrive ata largebuildingthatisa typeI have neverseenbefore.Itappearstoberightoutof . . . a Buck Rogerssetting!!Weare givensometypeofwarm beveragewhich tastedlike nothingI haveever savoredbefore.Itisdelicious.After about tenmin-utes, two of our wondrousappearinghostscometoourquartersandannouncethatI am toaccompanythem.Ihavenochoice but to comply. I leavemy radioman behind and we walk a shortdistanceand enterinto whatseemsto be anelevator.We descenddownward forsomemoments, the machine stops, and the door lifts silently upward!We thenproceeddowna longhallwaythatislitby a rose-colored light thatseemstobeema-natingfrom theverywallsthemselves! One of thebeingsmotions for us to stopbefore agreat door. . . I step inside and myeyes adjust tothebeautifulcolorationthatseemstobefilling theroomcompletely. Then I begin toseemy surroundings.What greetedmy eyes is themostbeautiful sightof my entire existence. It is infacttoobeautifulandwondroustodescribe.It is exquisiteanddelicate.Idonot thinkthereexists ahumanterm that candescribeitinanydetailwithjustice!333

Strictly speaking,thissub-groupis notextra-terrestrialinorigin butsimply a sub-

terrestrial humanoid race that is genetically linked to humanity. A number ofarcheologists/historiansbelievethese ancientadvancedracesare the basisof numer-ousmyths concerning the intervention of mysterious “white brothers/gods” in thedevelopmentof civilizationaroundtheplanet.334The AztecsandIncans,for example,atfirst believed theSpanishConquistadors were their returning“whitebrothers/gods.”335 Thesesub-surface Lemuriancitiescontinue to inter-act with ETraces, have advancedtechnology and assist humanity in dealing with its myriad of social, economic,politicalandenvironmentproblems.Sourcesdescribethepsychotronic

179

crystaltechnologyusedby theseLemuriansub-surfacecities,andtheeffortstopromotethistechnologyforpeacefulpurposes.336

This sub-group race loosely cooperates with the first sub- group of the “goodshepherd”ETfaction (EarthbasedReptilians)in ensuringthathumanitydoesn’t destroyitssurfacehabitat.However,theyarestrategiccompetitorswhenit comesto theevolutionarydevelopmentofhumanitywhichthissub-group(Lemurians/Atlanteans) supports butwhichthe EarthbasedReptiliansrestrict.

It is this loose alliance of Earth based ET races thatinfluences/controls theleadership of the secret societies thathavehistoricallydominated humanity. Thus theleadership of Freemasons, Illuminati, Knights Templars, etc., all reflect a loosecooperation by terrestriallybased ET races thatshare commoninterests inpreventing globalcatastrophe onthe planet,butdiffer profoundlyoverthe evolutionof the humanspeciesandwhether“off-world”ETracesshouldinterveneon Earth.337

The secondsub-groupintheProtectiveParentmodelisoff-world ETs thatinterveneto assisthumanity in dealingwith off-world ETraces. This category is commonly describedas“Nordics”and“Semites”thatcomefromSirius B, Pleiades,Altair, AlphaCentauri,andAndromeda.They arehumanoidinappearance,between7–8 feetinheight,andhavean interven-tioniststrategyin dealingwiththe destabilizingstrategies of thesecondand thirdETsub-groups from the“goodshepherd”faction. Inan interview withDr.Michael Wolf,aformer NationalSecurityCouncilconsultantwhobecamepartofthenew“acclimation”program,Dr.RichardBoylan reportsas follows:

Wolf was nonchalant about such human-extraterrestrial interactions, havinghimselfworkedsidebyside i nclassified government laboratories with ahuman-appearingETfromthe Altairsystemanda“Grey”humanoid scientistfrom theZeta Reticulisystem.“Altair’s fourthandfifth planets are inhabited. Infact,the people fromAltair colonized the Pleiades systemlong ago.The human-lookingPleiadeanextraterrestrials

180

some people meet are actuallyancestrallyAltairians.There are twovariants, the Semitic-looking ones and the Nordic-looking ones.The‘Semitics’are the racewhich landed atHolloman AirForce Base (NewMexico) in the‘60s,andconversedwith somegeneralsthere.”338

Some of theways in which these“Nordic/Semite”ETs assisthumanity is, for

example,to counterthe harmfulenvironmentaleffectsofadvancedweaponstechnologydevel- oped and deployed by clandestine organizations. Also, significant terroristactionssponsoredbythe“goodshepherd”ETfaction,arepresumablymitigatedorpreventedbyNordic/Semiteraces.339

Forinstance,terroristactionssubsequenttotheSeptember11, 2001attackmay havebeenpreventedby covertassistancefrom theseracestosecurityforcesaroundtheplanet,therebyhelpingtostabilizeEarth’ssecuritysituation.

TheseNordic/Semiteoff-worldETsdonotenterintoagreementswithclandestinegovernments in terms of weapons technology, but do assist in encouraging thedevelopmentofadvancedtechnologywhichdoesnothaveamilitaryapplication.Dr.Wolf, for example, witnessed a tall ‘’Nordic/ Semitic” race in joint ET/Clandestinegovernmentfacilities thatpresumablyworkedonnon-weaponsrelatedtechnology.340Individuals describe the positive experiences they have in interacting with these ETraces as opposed to themoreintimidating experiences with the “good shepherd” ETraces.341 This sub-groupis essentiallya strategiccounterweight to the influenceof theoff-world elementsof the“goodshepherd”faction.The“offworldgoodshepherd” sub-groupsviewtheoff-world“protectiveparent” ET sub-groupasits mortalenemy,sincethelatterpresentsa threattotheability of theformertointer-veneandcontrolhumanityas a resource.Wise MentorETsThe third analogytobeusedtodescribeETcontroland influ-ence isthe“wise mentor”category.These races have ahands-off

181

approach to global humanity and onlyoffer assistanceifitisinthebest interestof allconcernedin such an intervention.Theypromote“consciousnessraising”andhavea moral orientation that is deeply spiritual insofaras theypresent theunity of alllife,andtheimportanceof honoringthe roleof allforcesintheevolutionarydevelopmentofhumanity.

They do not offer technology in the conventional sense but a highly advanced“language of light” technology consisting of sacred geometrical forms that aresimultaneouslyfoundthroughoutthe universe,in the atom,andthe humanenergyfield.Theyteachthatunderstandingthe sacred geometricallight patternsinall lifewillleadtotheemancipationof individ-uals andlifeon theplanet.342

Wise mentor ETs do not directly confront and counter the influence of “goodshepherd” ET races, which differentiates this category from the “protective parent.”Indeed,“wise men-tor”ETswarn againsttheimplicit dangersof intervention since thismay retardtheevolutionarygrowthofhumanity.

Putsimply,the wisementorETs view the hard knocksofhumanity’sencounterwith“good shepherd”ETs as partof the evolutionaryprocess for a species and thus donotintervene. In contrast, protecting humanity from the “hard knocks” of human-ity’sencounterwith “goodshepherd”ETsisan importantgoalof“protectiveparent”ETs.

The philosophical issues here are the same confronting an “energy healer” inpreventive medicine. If thealternativemed- ical practitioner healed the illness withoutactivecollaborationby thepatient, then thepatient recoversbutwould besuscep- tible tofuture recurrences. The accomplished alternative medical practitioner, however,simply demonstrates to the patient how to heal themselves, thereby minimizing thechancesoffuturerecurrences.343

Two sub-groupsof the “wisementor”factionare generallydescribedasdirect off-shootsofnon-physicalbeingsfromahigherdimensionalrealitywhoprojectedformintothe dimen-sion/densitythathumanityoccupies.344 Thefirstarenon-humanoidracesthat areclaimed toderive from Arcturus, SiriusA and parts of theOrion constellation.AccordingtoDr.J.J.Hurtak,these beingsformahierarchysimilarto thatdescribedin

182

religioustextsconcerningangelicordersoftheSeraphimandCherubim.345

Thesecondare describedbyLyssaRoyalandJamissonNerudaas the“Founding”or“Central”Race thatseeded theGalaxy untoldmillenniaago.346

Thefirstsub-group,accordingtoHurtak,comprises“Councils”thatinteractwithreceptivehumansandorganiza-tions tooffer assistanceand guidancewhen requested.347Mostevidenceforthe existenceofsuchET Councilscomesfromreportsof telepathiccommunicationswiththese beingswhotypicallyaredescribedashavingamixtureofhumanoidfeatures andbirdlikeorcatlikeheads.It appears that thesebeings mayhavebeen the inspirational source for ancient Egyptian sculptures depicting humans withanimalheadssuchas the “god” Thoth,whohad the head of an Ibis (a native Egyptianbird).

Thesecondsub-groupisdescribedvariouslyasthe“Founding” or “CentralRace”thatpresumablygavehumanityitsoriginalgeneticform.According toLyssaRoyalandKeith Priest,the “FoundingRace”playsthe roleof “parentalarchetypes”forhumanity’sexpressioninmaleandfemaleforms,andoriginallyseeded humanityin theconstellationofLyra.348

AccordingtoNeruda,theFounding/Centralrace inhabitsa regionwithin the centralgalaxies of the universe and seeded thegalaxiesmany billions of years ago.They left“subtlefinger-prints”of theirpresencewhich ifinterpreted correctly,opensthe doorfordifferent speciesto reestablishcommunicationwith them.349

Royal, PriestandNeruda all equate the Founding/CentralRace with the Elohim ofancient religious texts, and argue that they act as silent helpers in the evolution ofhumanityfor thosewho choose to“re-connect” with them. The idea of root races thatseeded theGalaxy is foundin “advisorybodies”suchasthe “Councilof Nine”thatoffersspiritual counseling for the evolution of the human species according to individualsclaimingtobeincommunicationwith them.350

183

Table1. SummaryofMotivationsandActivitiesofExtraterrestrialRaces

Category Factions— PrimaryAgenda Alliances/Conflicts

Subgroups Good Earth Reptilians Harvestshuman ‘Loose alliances’ withDracoReptiliansandGray

races.AlsoShepherd emotionalenergies cooperatewith subterraneanhumanracesto

preventecocide

Grays—Zeta/Orion

Harvestshuman WorkswithEarth basedReptilians.Zeta Graysofteninconflict

geneticmaterial withDraco Reptilians

Draco Establishescontrolover

Exercisescontrolover ‘subordinateraces’(humansandEarth

Reptilians(Orion) Earth’s resources basedReptilians). Ofteninconflict withZeta Grays

GiantHominoids Most efficientuseof CooperatewithDracoReptiliansinensuringmostefficient

from Lyra/Nibiru Earth’s resources useofEarth’s resources

Protective Subterranean Assist surfacehumans Conflict with Earth basedReptiliansoverevolutionof

Parent Humanoid toevolveas a species&

(surface)humanrace,butcooperatewithReptiliansin

Civilizations dealwithEarth based preventingdestructionof ecosphere

(Lemuria/Atlantis) Reptilians HumanoidET

RacesAssistsurface humansto

Opposeseffortsby Grays (short andtall)andDraco

(Sirius,Pleiades, evolveasaspecies& Reptiliansingainingcontrolover humanityandearth

Altair,etc.) deal bestwithETraces

Wise Non-humanoidraces

Offers advicetohumanity

Encouragesintegrativesolutionstohumanproblems

Mentor (Arcturus, SiriusA,

inhow tobestdealwith

stemmingfrom conflict betweendifferentETracesabove,

Orion) its evolutionarychallenges

belowandon theEarth’s surface

Humanoid—Formless

Providedinitialgenetic

Seedsadvancedtechnology/knowledgewithinplanets

(Central Race—center

materialforemergenceof

whosediscoveryenablesspeciestoevolveinharmonywith

ofGalaxy) humanoidracesinthe thebiosphere

planetLyraandelsewhere

©MichaelSalla, PhD, 2003.

184

The StructureofClandestineOrganizationsThe key to understanding how the above ET categories influence clandestineorganizations is that the latter are generally aware of the political, moral andphilosophical orientations of the different ET races and of other clandestineorganizations. Clandestine organizations therefore try to steer a cause thro ughthesevariousET intervention philosophies andstrategies. At the same time theycooperate and compete with one another in a way that maximizes the power of the clandestineorganiza-tions,withoutbeingundulycompromised by “infiltration”by the differentETfactions/subgroups.

Thusforthe respectiveleadersofclandestineorganiza-tions,athree dimensionalchessgameis occurringinvolvingmultipleplayers,theatersandgoalsthatinfluence thedynam-icswithin andbetweenthem.

Clandestine organizations focusedon the ET presence first became established when various intelligence and military organizations became aware of the ETpresence,atleastfrom1941, when a downed ET spacecraft was found in low ocean water west of SanDiego.351TheNavy took chargeof theinves-tigationandassumeda leadingrole whichitcontinuestoplayup tothepresent.

This is supported by the testimonies of thoseclaiming tohave participated inclandestineexperimentssurroundingtime/interdimensionaltravel as itfirst begantoemerge into the public arena concerning the Philadelphia Experiment and later atMontauk,LongIsland.352 Subsequently,there emerged aneed forpublicsecrecywhileanadequate policyresponsecouldbedevelopedby theUSgovernment.

This led to the emergence of clandestine organizations embeddedwithin variousmilitary, intelligence, and policy mak- ingbranches ofgovernment, each ofwhichhave different though overlapping functions according to the larger goals of thedepartment.

Membersof the“parentdepartment”arenot awareof thefullextentof activities andinfluencesoftheseembeddedclan-destineorganizations,eventhoughtheysharethesameover-archingfunction.353For example,the threemainbranchesof

185

the US military—Navy,ArmyandAirforce—havetheirownweaponsdevelopmentandintelligencedepartmentsalldesignedtoultimatelyprotectthenationalsecurityof theUS.

Withineachofthesespecializeddepartmentsisembeddeda clandestineorganizationthatisresponsiblefor reverseengi-neeringETtechnologyfor thepurposeof weaponsdevelop-ment, and for gaining intelligence concerning EToperations on the planet, inordertodevelopan adequatedefensepolicy.354

Thusthe clandestineorganization embedded inthe USNavy, for example,willbeunknown to other Naval units focused on broader issues concerning weapons developmentandintel-ligencegathering,and whoselower secrecyclassificationwouldmake it a crime for Navy personnel to gather information about these clandestineorganizations.355 Thiseffectively leadstoclan-destineorganizationsembedded in theNavythatare com-partmentalized andhaveadegree ofautonomy,powerandresourcesunknownto personnelofthe widerNavyevenatseniorleadershiplevels.

FormerAir forceSergeant DanShermandescribes the wayclandestine organizationsareembedded invarious military/intel-ligenceorganizationswithoutbeingdiscovered bypryingcon-gressmen.Inrecalling aCaptain’sbriefing tohim,Shermanwrote:

Blackmissions,which we call Level 2, arewhat thealien projects are effectivelyhidden behind. Theexistenceofblack missions isonlyknown byahandful ofCongressmenandthePresident.Theseblackmissionsarethelastlineofdefense forthealienprojects.Whereveranalienprojectis locatedthere mustbe ablackmissiontocover its existencefrom prying eyes. Itcreates a highly sophisticated shielddesignedtomaskthegray project’sexistencefrom high level officials whohave no need-to-know. Otherwise, the alien project would eventually comeunderscrutinybysomeonewithin official channels.As it standsunderthe currentsystem,ifa nosy Congressmanstartslookingwherehehasnoneed-to-know,hecanbe briefed on the black mission, be made to feel important and therebysquelchinganyfurther digging.It’sanextremelyeffective

186

method of hidingalienmissions andis thereasontheyhave beenhiddenso effectively forso long.356

The NationalSecurityAgencywas created in 1952; intelli-gencegathering was its

primary responsibility.Within the NSA there is embedded a clandestine organizationresponsible forintelligencegatheringon ETracesandestablishingcommuni-cationwiththem.

Accordingto JamissonNeruda,the clandestineorganiza-tionin theNSA is calledthe“AdvancedContactIntelligenceOrganization”(ACIO) andisembedded withintheSpecialProjectsLaboratory.As in thecaseof theUSNavy, thelargermembershipoftheNSAwillbeunawareofthetrue activities ofACIOduetoitshighersecrecyclassification.

Sergeant Shermanrecalls how when briefed by his captain that he was part of asecretNSA project called “Project Preserve Destiny” in which hewas a result of anexperimentdesigned toenhance telepathic communication with the“Gray” ETspecies:

The experiment that I’m referring to was, and still is, named “Project PreserveDestiny.” It started in 1960 and was fully operational by 1963. It was a geneticmanage-ment projectwith thesole purposeof cultivating human offspring so thatthey would have theability tocommu-nicatewiththegrays.357

The most important of all the clandestine organizations embedded in US

government agenciesis the one containedwithin the National SecurityCouncil (NSC).PresidentTrumanestablished theNSC in 1947and its functionwas to coordinatepolicyrecommendations from different branches of government, military and intelligence communitiesintoacoherent set ofpolicy recommendationsfrom which Presidentscanchoose.358

This coordinating function played by the NSC in general is replicated in theclandestineorganizationembedded intheNSC, which has beenknown by a numberofnames,includingMajestic-12derivedfromadocument signedbyPresidentTruman in1947.359

187

Created by Truman as a Presidentialpolicycoordinating

committee on theETpresence, MJ-12 was formally incorporatedinto the NSCin 1954withanNSCedictcreating the parentorganization inwhich MJ-12 would beembedded.The “official”versionpertainingtothis partofNSChistory isas follows:

In 1954 NSC 5412 provided for the establishment of a panel of designated representatives of the Presidentand theSecretariesof Stateand Defense tomeetregu-larlytoreviewandrecommendcovertoperations.GordonGray assumedthechairmanshipof the“5412Committee”asitwascalled,andallsucceedingNationalSecurity Advisers havechairedsimilar successor committees, variously named “303,” “40,” and “SpecialCoordinating Committee,” which, in later Presidential administrations, werecharged with the reviewof CIAcovertoperations.360

The 5412 Committee contains a subcommittee called PI-40 whose role is to

coordinate information from all other clandestine organizations focused on the ETpresenceso thosepolicymakerscomprisingPI-40 candevelopa coherent set of policychoices for deliberation.361 Clandestine organizations embedded in privateorganizations suchas the CouncilofForeignAffairs provide the best personnel andresourcesforrecruit-mentandpolicy discussioninPI-40.

IndescribingtheearlycompositionofMJ-12,WilliamCooper,noted the relianceonagroupfromthe CouncilonForeignRelationshe dubbedthe“wise men”:

The “WiseMen”were key members of theCouncilonForeign Relations. Therewere 12membersincludingthe first6fromGovernment positions thusMajorityTwelve. Thisgroupwas madeupovertheyearsof thetop officersanddirectorsofthe Council on Foreign Relations and later the Trilateral Commission. GordonDean, George Bush and Zbigniew Brzezinski were among them. The mostimportant and influential of the “Wise Men” who served on MJ-12 were JohnMcCloy,

188

RobertLovett,AverellHarriman,CharlesBohlen,GeorgeKennan, and Dean Acheson.Theirpoliciesweretolast well intothedecadeof the70s. It is significantthatPresidentEisenhoweraswell asthe first 6 MJ-12members from theGovernment were also members of theCouncil on ForeignRelations.362

In theory then,PI-40 shouldbe at the pinnacle of powerwhen it comes to the ET

presenceemployingthe bestmindsfor a coordinated response to theETpresence. Inreality, however, due to bureaucratic resistance, separate agendas and “rogueindividuals,”differentclandestineorganizationsarereluctanttoshare informationthatcouldcompromisetheirpower,resourcesorinfluence.This is illustratedin JamissonNeruda’s discussion of how the clandestine organization he claims to have been amemberof,refusesto share its mostimportantinformationwith theparentorganization,theNSA,inwhich itwas embedded.363

Asmightbeimagined, theseproblems aremagnifiedevenmore at the global levelwhen the chief clandestine organizations at the national levelmeet to discuss andcoordinateglobalpolicy on theETpresence.

Accordingto“whistleblower”testimony,theannual“Bilderberggroupmeeting”has embeddedwithin ita clandestineorganization whoseexpressgoal is to coordinatenationalpoliciesconcerningtheETpresence. Dr.RichardBoylan outlines the originsandfunctionsofBilderbergbased on his interviewswithvarious whistleblowertestimoniesasfollows:

Bilderberg was conceived in response to the 1952 E Trepeated overflights ofWashington,DC andthefollow-ingyear’smeetingbetweenPresidentEisenhowerandET representatives at what is nowEdwards Air Force Base, CA. It is nocoincidencethatWalterBedellSmith,President Eisenhower’s CIADirector, wasalsohisdesigneetothe1954inaugural meeting of theBilderberg Council.Bilderberg is anattempt for world leaders todraw together in concerted action tocreateaunified policy inworldmattersofpeace,democracy,and

189

coordinatedpreparationofworldinstitutionsandthepopulaceforthemassive changeswhichpublic disclosureofextraterrestrialpresencewillbring.364

Such a claim is givengreater credence by the roleplayedby NelsonRockefeller in

startingthe annualBilderberg groupmeetings. In1954, PresidentEisenhowerappointedRockefeller his “Special Assistant for Cold War Planning,” a position that officiallyinvolvedthe“monitoringandapprovalof covertCIAoperations.”

Thiswas merelya coverforRockefeller’s truerole indirect-ing USforeignpolicyin thewakeof the“secrettreaty”earlierdiscussedbetweentheZeta/OrionETraceandtheUS.Rockefeller’smain concernwas todesign,implementand mon-itor theextensivemilitary andintelligenceprogramssetupinresponsetotheETpresenceingeneral,andtheformal treatywith theZeta/OrionETrace.

Rockefellerplayeda key coordinatingrolein theclandes-tineorganization,Majestic12, embedded within the National Security Council. With the Bilderberg annual meeting,Rockefellerwouldplay a similar role in ensuring thatdifferentWestern blocnationalgovernmentswouldcoordinatetheirresourcesinmeetingboththechallengeposedby theWarsawPact andtheETpresence.

Although clandestine organizations should in theoryoperate in a similarfashion to their parent departments which coordinate and share resources for theoverridinggoalofprotecting the National Securityof the US, the truth is that theseclandestineorganizationscooperatetoaminimaldegree.Their cooperation islimitedby perceptionsof a zero-sumcompetitionagainstone anotherfor influence,prestigeandresources.

For example,clandestineorganizationsin theArmy, NavyandAirforce working tointegrate ET technology into weapons systems will be in competition over whichweaponssystemsdeservefundingandtheperceivedthreatsjustifyingsuchexpenditure.Unlike the intense debate over conventional weapons that emerges into the publicarena,debate overETtechnologyacquisitionanddeploymentishighly classified.

190

The compartmentalizednatureof theseorganizations,the

securityclassificationwhich puts thembeyond congressional/departmental supervisionfor regularbranchesof government,the interactionwithET racesandtheirtechnology,andthefierceinteragencyrivalries overfundingfor weaponsacquisi-tion, make theseclandestineorganizationsprimetargetsforETinfiltration.ETInfiltrationofClandestineOrganizationsThe infiltration of clandestine organizations occurs through technologyexchange/development programs, and intelligencegathering techniques whichsupposedlyassist theminperform-ingtheirspecificfunctions,butwhichinrealitymakethem susceptible to ET infiltration. One common technology used by theseorganizationswhichis highlyquestionablein termsofthe degree to whichthispermitsET infiltrationis “BrainEnhancement” Technology which, according toDr.Wolf,“allows utilization of a vastly-increasedpercentage of thebrain, in order for humans tomentallyengagetheextraterrestrialsinfulltelepathicmentalexchange.”

TheTreatmentinvolves “awayofopeningthebrain up, awaytostimulatetheneurons.Itallowsbillionsofsynapsestoform.”365Accordingto Dr.Wolf,heunderwent amentalenhancementprocess where his IQ wasraisedfrom141to 186.366 Similarly,JamissonNerudadescribestheBrain Enhancementtechnologyused in theclandestine organization, Labyrinth, embeddedin theNSA,and theexpectation that all reaching a sufficiently high security classification were “invited toundertaketheprocess.”367

AlBielak, a participantin the infamousMontaukprogramrunby theUSNavy,alsoreported the useof Brain enhance-ment technology by the NSA.368 Rather than solelyincreasing IQ and brain capacities, such technology raises serious concerns over itscapacity to program recipients in cognitive and behavioral patterns that support ETinfluenceandinfiltrationinto thehighestpolicy makingspheres.

Theresultof these numerous clandestine organizationshavingdifferent functionsandinteractionswithETtechnology,

191

is that this contributes toa high level ofdistrustand competitionamong clandestine organizations in the US which superficially cooperate but aresuspicious to the degree to which ET infiltration has occurred with “partner”organizations.ThisETinfiltrationproblemis alludedto inCol.PhillipCorso’sanalysisof therelationship between the US military, the CIA and the intelligence services ofothercountries:

The CIA, KGB, British Secret Service, and a whole host of other foreignintelligenceagencieswereloyaltothemselvesandtothe professionfirstandtotheirrespectivegovernmentslast... Spy organizationslikethe CIA andthe KGBtend to existonlyto preservethemselves,andthat’swhyneither theUSmilitarynor the Russian military trust them . . . CIA penetration by the KGB and whatamounted totheir joint spyingon the military was a factwe accepted during the1950sand1960s ...369

AlthoughCorsowas referring totheCold War struggle, theET focus of his book,

TheDayAfterRoswell,implicitlywassuggestingthis infiltration problemalso appliedtothe ET interaction with different clandestine organizations. A revealing factor inCorso’s comments is that institutional culture plays a role in how a clandestine organizationmaybe infiltratedbydifferentETfactionsandsub-groups.

The different branches of theUSmilitary place an emphasis on loyalty, discipline,hierarchicaldecisionmaking, and weaponsdevelopmentwhich makes themsusceptibletoETracesthatshare thesevalues.Thereforeitislikely thatReptiliansub-groupsfromthe “Good Shepherd” ET category which have been noted to share these militaryculturesare likely tohaveinfiltratedvariousbranchesoftheUSmilitary.370 ThisissupportedbytestimonybyJohnMaynard,formermilitaryintelligenceanalystwith theDefenseIntelligenceAgency:

I cametotheconclusionthatsomethingwas notquite rightbetween the aliensandthepeoplewhowere incontactwiththem.Notsomuchthatitwasstated

192

outright,butjustsomethingthatwassaidwhile Iwasdoingbackgroundchecksoncross-referenced docu-ments.Also, in statements madeduringconversationswith severalfellowworkersandmyfriendswho workedat Area51, it becameobviousthatall was notrightatGroomLake [NevadaArmyFacility].

Furthermore, other discreet conversations had indica-tions that there was aconfrontation goingon between higher authority and those that had daily contactwiththe aliens.However,Ineverlearnedexactlywhattheproblemswere. AllIcouldgraspfrom theconversationswasthatthere definitelywasa confrontationof somekind. I havecontinued my research on this and believe that it is still going ontoday,butinamore heatedsense,such as armedbelligerenceon bothsides,withamuchsmaller alien presence.371

Maynard is suggesting here that rogue clandestine organizations, most likely

infiltratedbygood shepherd ETs,wereoperatingindependentof centralizedcontrolbypolicy coordi-natingorganizations suchasMJ-12/PI-40. Thissometimesresulted inarmedmilitary conflict between different factions of theUSmilitary, presumably thoseundercentralizedcontrolandthoseinfiltratedby ETraces.

Aside from intra-US military aggression, there is evidence that infiltration alsomanifested itself in extremely aggressive behavior by sectors of the US militarytowards the ZetaGrayrace.Thatsuch infiltrationhasoccurred is supported by testi-mony byDr.Wolfinan interview byDr.RichardBoylan concern-ing a grouphe callsthe“cabal”:

Wolf haslabeledthisconspiratorialgroup of plotters“TheCabal.” Made upofextremist, fundamentalist, xenophobic, racist, and paranoiac officers, the Cabalfears and hates extraterrestrials. And, without a n yPresidential orCongressionalauthorization,theCabalhas commandeeredStar Wars weaponrytoshootdownUFOs, taken surviving extraterrestrials prisoner, and attempted toextractinformationbyforce.372

193

Confirmationthatasecretwarusinghighlyadvanced

technologyis beingconducted by sections of the US militaryagainst theZeta comesfrom Col. SteveWilson, a highly deco-ratedmilitary officer who claims tohaveled aclandestineproj-ect (Project Pounce)toretrievedownedETcraft.373Intelligenceservicessuchas theCIAandNSA, which focusonthe intelli-gencegathering,dissemination ofinformationand establishingcommunicationwithdifferentETraces,aremoresusceptibletoinfiltration byZeta Grays who sharecertainaspectsofthis insti-tutionalculture.374

Theextent to which these clandestine organizations havebeen compromised by“goodshepherd” ETs isevident inwhistleblower testimonies suchasPhil Schneider’s.Schneiderwitnessed thesecretjoint underground facilities betweenhumansandETs,andthekey roleplayedby theseETs in theestablishmentofaNew World Order.375

Schneider described how the clandestine organization he worked for wascompromised by “tall Grays”/”Reptilians” andhowtheywere preparing fora“oneworldgovernment.”376Therearealsotestimoniesof a numberof formerparticipantsin clandestineprogramsthatinvolvedjoint ET/humancollabo-rationin testinganddevelopingnew technologiesinorganiza-tionsembeddedintheNavy, ArmyandAirforce.377

AccordingtoStewartSwerdlowandotherparticipantsin ahighly classifiedseriesofprojects ledby theUSNavy dubbed the “Montauk Project,” clandestine organizationsinvolvedinkidnappingUScitizens formind controlexperimentsarecollab-oratingwithGray/Reptilian ETs in trying to learn more about human emotional and behavioralresponsesanddevelopingadvancedtime/interdimensionaltechnologies.378 Finally,BillCooperbelievesthata jointhuman/ETpowerstructure existswhich hasan agendafor thetotalcontroloverhumaninstitu-tionsandpopulations.379

The “protective parent” ET races have a distinct disadvan- tage in dealing withclandestineorganizationssincetheirunwillingnesstoexchangetechnologythathas amilitaryappli-cation,andindeedrestrictionsontheuseofadvancedweaponryleadstothemhavinglimitedinfluencewith clandes-tineorganizations.As mentionedearlier,ameetingbetween

194

President Eisenhower and this faction ofhumanoidETsresultedinfailuredue to adisagreement overthe utilityofthe USnuclearmilitary program.380 Subsequently,“protectiveparent”racesfocustheireffortsonminimizingthe chancesofglobalwarfarebreakingout,minimizingtheharmfuleffectso fadvanced weaponstesting,preventingthedestabilizingagen-dasof “good shepherd”ETsfrom succeeding;and countering the infiltration of “good shepherd” ETs into key clandestineorganizations.381

The influenceof “wise mentor” races on clandestine organizations is evenmorelimited, since their spiritual counseling has only limited appeal to clandestineorganizations as bureau-cratic institutions locked intoazero-sum conflict for power,resourcesand influence.Dr.Nerudaclaims inhis interviews thathewasforced todefectfromthe clandestineorganizationembedded in the NSA, sincethe spiritualcounselingby the “central race” in the form of philosophy, art and music was deemed to beinsufficientforofferingthe sortofweaponstechnologynecessaryfordefenseagainstETintervention.

WhenNerudawas suspectedof beingundertheinfluenceof this “wise mentorrace,”he had todefector riskhaving inva-sivememorytechnologiesappliedthatwouldremoveallknowledgeoftheinteractionhehadwiththisrace.Theinfluenceof these“wise mentor” races does appear to have a significant impact on those individuals inclandestineorganiza-tionsthatopen themselvesto the influenceof the former.382They become progressive forces for publicdisclosure of theETpresence through agradual acclimation program, and for a more benign military response to ETinterventions,yettheyremainintheminority inthepolicy makingprocess.383Conclusion:RespondingtoETInfiltrationinClandestineOrganizationsThecompartmentalizednatureofclandestineorganizationswiththeir specializedfunctionsconcerningtechnologyexchange,intelligencegatheringand developmentofadvancedweaponry,makesthemvulnerableto infiltrationbyET races

195

that do not serve the highest interest ofglobalhumanityas anevolvingspecies.The dangerof suchinfiltrationis thatpolicymaking atthenationalandgloballevel concerning theETpres-ence is skewed to serve the interest of a particularfactionofETs termedthe “good shepherd,”whoseagenda is to utilizehumanityand thebiosphere(Earth)as a resourcebasefor theagendas ofthe differentET sub-groupsinthe “good shep-herd”category.

ThoseETgroupswhocanplaya more supportiveroleinthedevelopmentof globalhumanity(“protective parent” and“wise mentor” ETfactions) aremarginalized in thepolicy making process due to the manner in which clandestine organizations aredominatedbyinterests dedicatedtotechnologyacquisitionandintelligencegathering.

Thedangerof maintainingsucha focusis thatit willplayinto thehandsof “goodshepherd”ETsintenton “harvesting”humanityasaresourcewhilemarginalizing thoseET groups that can offer better assistance to global humanity in its evolution as adistinctspecies.The following policiesthereforeneedtobeimplemented:

• Fulldisclosureof theETpresencetoallow publicaware-nessof the differentETfactionsandtheextenttowhichthesehave influencedclandestineorganizations.• Supervisionof all clandestineorganizationsandopera-tionsconcerningETsbyspeciallyconvenedcongres-sional/legislativebodiesdesignedtoillicitinformationonthe scopeandimplicationsofthese technologiesandactivities.• Full andopen diplomaticrelations with ET representa-tivesensuringpeacefulrelationsandinteractionsbetweenglobalhumanityandETraces.• Eliminationof clandestineweaponsprogramsinfiltratedby “good shepherd”ETswhose intent is to destabilize national governments and encourage militaryresponsestotheETpresence.• Transparencyin allglobalpolicy makingin organizationssuch as theBilderberggroupthat attemptstocoordinateglobalpolicy on theETpresence.

196

• Monitoring of mentalenhancementtechnologiesin

termsof theextenttowhich theycompromisetheindependenceofindividualsassumingimportantleadershippositionsindealingwiththeETpresence.

ET infiltration of clandestine organizations needs to be recognized as a

phenomenonthatrequiresimmediate res-ponsespecificallybypolicymakersand ingeneral by global humanity. Such infiltration makes it difficult if not impossible toeffectively coordinate national and/or global policy making concerning the ETpresence, regardless of the competency of thoseplayinga coordinating role for allclandestineorganiza-tionsdealingwith this presence.

Hesitation indeveloping anadequate response to such infiltration threatens theshort-term sovereignty of globalhumanity and indeed the long-term presence ofhumanityas aresidentspeciesonthis planet.Truth,transparencyandclosesupervisionof all activitiesconcerningETs is the best coursefor policymakersandglobalhumanityin the challenges that lie ahead for integrating the technologies, knowledge andpossibilitiesposedby theETpresence.Notes

290.Many thankstoSusan Burton, aka ElizabethO’Rourke, for her editorial assistance in proofreading andeditingan earlierversionof thischapter.291.SeeMichaelWolf,CatchersofHeaven:ATrilogy(DorrancePublishingCo.,1996); DanSherman,AboveBlack: Project Preserve Destiny (Oneteam Press, 1997); Stewart Swerdlow, Montauk: The Alien Connection (ExpansionsPublishingCo.2002);PrestonNichols&PeterMoon,MontaukRevisited:AdventuresinSynchronicity(SkyBooks, 1991);WadeGordon,TheBrookhavenConnection(SkyBooks,2001). SeealsoStevenGreer, Military andGovernmentWitnessesRevealtheGreatestSecretsinModern History(CrossingPointPub., 2001).Acollectionof interviewsof an individualwho claims tobea high level defector,Dr.Neruda, from a Clandestine Organization embedded within the National Security Agency is available online at:

http://www.wingmakers.com/://www.wingmakers.com. For websitesthathavelinks to articles by anumberofformergovernmentparticipantsgoto:http://www.drboylan.com.

197



292.SeeStephenGreer, ExecutiveSummaryoftheDisclosureProject

(Crozet,VA.:DisclosureProject,April2001).Website:www.disclosureproject.com.293.For a discussionof the differentsourcesof evidence on theETpres-ence, see ChapterOne. Forthe mostdetailedonlinesourceforwhistleblowertestimonies,goto: http://www.disclosureproject.com.294.Foranin-depthdiscussionofthisphenomenonofET experience,seeC.D.B.Bryan,CloseEncounters oftheFourthKind:AlienAbduction,UFOs,andtheConference atM.I.T(AlfredKnopf,NewYork,1995);JohnE.Mack,Human Encounters withAliens(Ballantine Books, 1994);Linda MoultonHowe &Jacques Vallee, AlienHarvest: FurtherEvidenceLinkingAnimalMutilationsandHumanAbductionstoAlien LifeForms (LindaMoultonHowe, 1993).

295.Foranalysis ofdifferentevidentiarysourcesforETs,seeChapterOne.296. For reference to a secret government acclimation program, see Richard Boylan, “Government’s Unacknowledged Acclimation Program,”available online at: http://www.drboylan.com/aclmatn2.html. For a

1990 document purporting to describe an official acclimation program, s e e :http://www.swa-home.de/acclima.htm://www.swa-home.de/acclima.htm.

297.Sitchin’stranslationsare compiledinsixbookscalledthe EarthChronicles(AvonBooks).

298.Sitchin, The 12th Planet:Book 1oftheEarth Chronicles(AvonBooks,1976)pages336–61.299.SeeCarlJung,TheArchetypesandthe CollectiveUnconscious:CollectedWorksofC.G.Jung,Vol.9,Pt.1(PrincetonUniversityPress, 1981).

300.Sitchin, The 12th Planet,381–86.301.ForonlineversionoftheBookofEnoch,goto:http://

wesley.nnu.edu/noncanon/ot/pseudo/enoch.htm.302.See Nerudainterviews:http://www.wingmakers.com.

303.For various lists of ETraces,see RichardBoylan, “TheVariousKindsofStarVisitors,”availableonlineat:http://www.drboylan.com/ etraces.html. See also, Boylan, “Official Within MJ-12 UFO-SecrecyManagement GroupRevealsInsiderSecrets,”inBoylanandBoylan,LaboredJourneyToTheStars. Availableonlinea t:http://www.drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html; see also Robert Dean,Interview: http://www.extraterrestrial-aliens.com/32.htm;seealso:http://www.extraterrestrial-aliens.com.

304.ThomasHobbes,Leviathan(OxfordUniversityPress, 1998).305.David Icke,AliceinWonderlandand theWorld Trade CenterDisaster

(Bridge ofLovePublications,2002).306.FaustwasaGermanprofessorinplaysbyThomasMarlowandGoethewho surrenderedhissoul totheDevilinordertogain worldlyfame.ThestrongestadvocateofthisrelationshipbetweenGood

198



http://www.swa-home.de/acclima.htm




http://www.extraterrestrial-aliens.com/32.htm

http://www.extraterrestrial-aliens.com

Shepherd ETs and the global elite view is DavidIcke, TheBiggestSecret:TheBookThatWill ChangetheWorld,2nded. (BridgeofLovePublications,1999).

307.See Manetho,Manetho,tr.,Waddell(HarvardUniversityPress, 1940).308.JimMarrs, Rule by Secrecy:TheHiddenHistory thatConnectstheTrilateralCommission, the Freemasons, andtheGreat Pyramids(Perennial2001);David Icke,The BiggestSecret.309.SeeWilliam Bramley,Godsof Eden(Avon, 1989); andR. A. Boulay,Flying SerpentsandDragons: TheStoryof Mankind’sReptilianPast(Book Tree,1999).For an onlineinterviewof an individualwho metadelegation ofthissub-group of“goodshepherd” ETs,see LindaMoulton Howe, “Interview with Jim Sparx,” Nexus magazine, 7:2(2000).Available online at: http://www.nexusmagazine.com/jimsparx.html.310. See Linda Moulton Howe, “Interview with Jim Sparx,” Nexus magazine, 7:2 (2000):http://www.nexusmagazine.com/jimsparx.html.311. Evidence of ancientwarfare thatmust have destroyed entire civilizations is discussed by David HatcherChildress,TechnologyoftheGods:The IncredibleSciencesoftheAncients (AdventuresUnlimitedPress, 2000).312.SeeJanetta ReboldBenton,HolyTerrors:GargoylesonMedievalBuildings (Abbeville Press, 1997);DarleneTrewCrist&Robert Llewellyn,AmericanGargoyles:Spirits inStone(Clarkson N.Potter,2001).313. Phil Schneider, MUFON Conference Presentation, 1995, available online at: http://www.ufocoverup-conspiracy.com/20.htm.For descrip-tionof his sightingof 12 tall grays/reptilians,see the MarsRecord,p. 301,online at: http://www.metatech.org/TheMarsRecords.pdf.314. See Richard Boylan, “Official Within MJ-12 UFO-Secrecy Management Group Reveals Insider Secrets,”availableonlineat:http://www.drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html; WilliamCooper, “Origin, IdentityandPurposeof MJ-12,” in Behold A Pale Horse (Light Technology Publications, 1991), available online at:http://www.geocities.com/area51/shadowlands/6583/maji007.html; and PhilSchneider,MUFON Conference Presentation, 1995, available online a t :http://www.ufocoverup-conspiracy.com/20.htm;seeNerudaInterview#1:http://www.wingmakers.com;BoylangivesamoreextensivecoverageofeventssurroundingtheTreaty signingin“ExtraterrestrialBaseOnEarth,SanctionedByOfficials Since1954,”in Boylan andBoylan, LaboredJourneyToTheStars.Availableonlineat:http://drboylan.com/basespst2.html.315. Cooper, “Origin, Identity and Purpose of MJ-12,”—paper delivered at MUFON Conference 1989,availableonlineat:http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/maji007.html.

316.PhillipCorso,The DayAfter Roswell (Pocket Books, 1997)p. 292.317.Corso,The DayAfter Roswell, p. 292.

199

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/jimsparx.html

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/jimsparx.html


http://www.metatech.org/TheMarsRecords.pdf

http://www.geocities.com/



http://drboylan.com/basespst2.html

318.See “Genesis,”Bk.6,any editionofHolyBible.319.See Sitchin, The 12th Planet.

320.For discussionof Dracotechnology,seeStewartSwerdlow,Montaukthe AlienConnection, pages 137–43;see also Courtney Brown, Cosmic Explorers: Scientific Remote Viewing, Extraterrestrials, and a Message forMankind (Signet 2000),pages170–202.321.ForinformationonOperationPaperclip,seeLindaHunt,SecretAgenda:The UnitedStatesGovernment, NaziScientists, and Project Paperclip, 1945 to1990 (St.Martin’s Press, 1991);and ClarenceG. Lasby, Project Paperclip:GermanScientistsand theCold War(Scribner, 1975).For online discussionofOperationPaperclip,see“Secretsof theThirdReich”: http://www.violations.dabsol.uk/secrets/secretspart2.htm.

322.Corso,The DayAfter Roswell, p. 290.323. For more detailed discussion of these scenarios, see Michael E. Salla, “Exopolitical Comment #6.”Availableonlineat:http://www.exopolitics.org.324.FordiscussiononamanufacturedChrist,see StewartSwerdlow,Montauk:TheAlienConnection, pages 145–52. For discussion of time travel and holographic technologies of ETs and clandestine organizations, see:Preston Nichols&PeterMoon,MontaukRevisited;Wade Gordon,The BrookhavenConnection; andNerudaInterviews, #3, pages1–3: http://www.wingmakers.com; seealso thefollowing interview with Bob Lazar, whichdiscusses time travel: http://www.swa-home.de/lazar3.htm; and seeDr. Boylan, “U.S. Government, DimensionalPortalsandDr.WenHoLee”:http://drboylan.com/wenhlee2.html.325.SeeRichard Boylan,“FurtherDisclosures byWolf,”in BoylanandBoylan,LaboredJourneyToTheStars.Availableonlineat:http://www.drboylan.com/wlflkla.html.Seealso“NerudaInterview”#1,pages24–25:http://www.wingmakers.com.

326.#1,pages24–25;http://www.wingmakers.com.327.SeeWilliam Cooper, “The Secret Government: Origin, Identity and Purpose ofMJ-12,” in Behold a PaleHorse,pages 195–238;andavailableonlineat: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/maji007.html.Seealso MichaelWolf,The Catchersof Heaven;andRichardBoylan,“Official WithinMJ-12 UFO-Secre c yManagement Group Reveals Insider Secrets,” available online at:

http://www.drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html://www.drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html.328.Cooper,BeholdAPaleHorse,p.202.Alsocitedonlineat:

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/maji007.html.329.StephenGreer, directoroftheDisclosureProject, claimsto havemadecontactwith this groupofETsthroughhisefforts inestablishingcommunicationprotocolsforadvancedETraces.Goto:http://www.cseti.org.

200

http://www.violations.dabsol.uk/secrets/secretspart2.htm


http://www.swa-home.de/lazar3.htm


http://www.drboylan.com/wlflkla.html





http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/maji007.html

http://www.cseti.org

330.For descriptionsof theseETraces,see RichardBoylan, “TheVarious

Kinds of Star Visitors,” availableonlineat: http://www.drboylan.com/etraces.html; andBoylan, “Official WithinMJ-12 UFO-Secre c yManagement Group Reveals Insider Secrets,” available online at: http://www.drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html; see also Robert Dean, Interview, http://www.extraterrestrial-aliens.com/32.htm;seealsoAlBielak1991,Interview:http://www.bielak.com;andalso:http://www.extraterrestrial-aliens.com.331.Forahistory ofAtlantis and Lemuria, see Rudolf Steiner, Atlantis and Lemuria (Fredonia Books, 2002). Seesubterraneancities,seeRaymondBernard,TheHollowEarth:TheGreatestGeographicalDiscovery inHistory (CarolPubGroup,1991).Foronline informationonsubterraneancities, goto: http://www.crystalinks.com/agartha.html.332.ForonlineinformationonAdmiralByrd,goto:http://www.crystalinks.com/agartha.html. For a critiqueoftheveracity ofAdmiralByrd’sdiary,see DennisCrenshaw,“TheMissingSecret DiaryofAdmiralByrd: FactorFiction?”TheHollow EarthInsider,June22,2001.Availableonlineat:http://www.thehollowearthinsider.com/news/wmview.php?ArtID=6.333.RichardByrd, The Missing Diary of Admiral RichardByrd (Inner Light Publications, 1992). Admiral Byrd’sDiaryisavailableonlineat: http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/byrdiar.html.

334.See DavidHatcherChildress,TechnologyoftheGods: The IncredibleSciencesof theAncients(AdventuresUnlimitedPress, 2000).

335.See Carlos Mata, God’sWay(MorrisPublishing,2002).336.For descriptionsof these interactionswith ancientLemurians,seethe onlinematerialbyDonandCarolCroft,http://www.educate-yourself.com.337.For discussiononthehistoryof clandestineorganizations, see JimMarrs, Rule BySecrecy;andDavid Icke,And The Truth ShallSet YouFree,pages 221–38. JamissonNerudagivesextensivediscussionoftheorganizationofclandestineorganizationsinInterview #4 9-40.Hedividesthese intothree maingroups: Isolationists/Illuminati (eco-nomic power—e.g., Bilderbergs); Militarypower, e.g., CouncilofForeign Relations; Tavistock Institute;andthe Icunabala(masterstrategists—secretive).338.RichardBoylan, “LatestRevelationsby NSC ConsultantDr.MichaelWolf,” inBoylan and Boylan, LaboredJourneyToTheStars. Availableonlineat: http://www.drboylan.com/wlflk2a.html.339.For discussionof how Pleiediansintervenedduringthesecondworldwar, seeAlBielak, 1991 Interview:http://www.freezone.org/mc/e_conv02.htm.340.RichardBoylan, “LatestRevelationsby NSC Consultant,Dr.MichaelWolf,” inBoylan and Boylan, LaboredJourneyToTheStars. Availableonlineat: http://www.drboylan.com/wlflk2a.html.

201




http://www.bielak.com

http://www.crystalinks.com/agartha.html

http://www.thehollowearthinsider.com/

http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/byrdiar.html

http://www.educate-

http://www.drboylan.com/wlflk2a.html

http://www.freezone.org/

http://www.drboylan.com/wlflk2a.html

341.See StewartSwerdlow,The Montauk:The AlienConnection.

342. The best account of this philosophy and an advanced ET ‘light technology’ from a governmentwhistleblower is theonline “Wingmakers” material released by the “defector,” Jamission Neruda. Available at:

http://www.wingmakers.com/w.wingmakers.com.343.See Carolyn Myss,Anatomyof theSpirit: theSevenStagesofPowerandHealing(RandomHouse,1997).

344.See Royal&Priest, The Prism ofLyra,pages11–14.345.See J.J. Hurtak, TheBook ofKnowledge:TheKeysofEnoch (AcademyofFutureScience,1977).

346.SeeRoyal&Priest, Prism ofLyra;andNerudaInterviews, pages1–4.Available onlineat: http://www.wingmakers.com.347.DescriptionsoftheseadvancedETracesand various councils can befoundinJ.J. Hurtak, KeysofEnoch.

348.Royal&Priest, The PrismofLyra,pages11–14.349.See NerudaInterview #1,pages10–12ff:http://www.wingmakers.com.

Anothersourceofmaterial forthe activitiesofaCentral RaceisAshanayaDeanne,Voyagers: Secrets of Amenti,Vols.1–2(WildflowerPress, 2002).350.See PhyllisSchlemmer, The Only Planet of Choice: Essential Briefings from Deep Space, 2nd ed. (GatewayBooks,1995).Seealso Hurtak,KeysofEnoch; andDeane,Voyagers.351.See “Quotationsfrom ChairmanWolf” inBoylan and Boylan, LaboredJourneytotheStars, available at:http://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html;andDr.Neruda,Interview#1:http://www.wingmakers.com.

352.SeeBrad Steiger,AlfredBielek, Sherry HansonSteiger,PhiladelphiaExperimentandOtherUFO Conspiracies(Inner Light Publications,1990);PrestonNichols, The MontaukProject.353. For classification and analysis of these organizations, see RichardBoylan: “The Shadow Government: ItsIdentification and Analysis,” in Boylan and Boylan, Labored Journey to the Stars, available online at:

http://www.drboylan.com/shadgovt2.html://www.drboylan.com/shadgovt2.html.354. See Phillip Corso, BeyondRoswell, for discussion of his involvement in the Army’s clandestine efforts toreverseengineerETtechnology.355.William Cooper servedon the briefingteamof the Commander ofthe Pacific Fleet and reported he had tostudy andreporton a num-berofhighlyclassifiedreportsconcerningthe ET presence. SeeCooper, BeholdaPaleHorse.AlthoughCooperwasnotformerlypartof a clandestineorganization,the highsecurityclassificationoftheETmaterialmeantonlyveryfewNavypersonnelcouldever learnaboutthepresence.356.Dan Sherman,Above Black: Project PreserveDestiny, Insider Account of Alien Contact andGovernmentCover-up(OneTeamPublishing,1997),Ch. 3.Available onlineat: http://www.aboveblack.com.

202





http://www.drboylan.com/shadgovt2.html


357.Sherman,AboveBlack,Ch2.Availableonlineat:http://www.aboveblack.com.358.Foronline informationon thehistory oftheNSC,goto:www.nsc.gov.359.Anonlinecopy ofTruman’s letterauthorizingcreationofMajestic12

isavailableat: http://209.132.68.98/pdf/truman_forrestal.pdf.360.See: http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/history.html.

361.Otherwhistleblowersourceson thetruefunctionof MJ-12 areinter-views by ColonelSteveWilson andDr.Michael Wolf in Boylan and Boylan, Labored Journey To The Stars. Both interviews available online at:http://www.drboylan.com/mj12org2.htmlandhttp://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html.362. Cooper, “Origin, Identity and Purpose of MJ-12,” available online at:http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/maji007.html;See also Cooper,BeholdAPale Horse,p. 208.

363.See NerudaInterviews, pages1–4.364. See Richard Boylan, “Bilderbergers, ETs and World Peace,” available online at:http://www.drboylan.com/bldrbg2.html. SeealsoRichardWilson& Silvia Burns,“The USGovernment andExtraterrestrialEntities,”http://www.extraterrestrial-aliens.com/31.htm.365.Richard Boylan,“Quotations fromChairmanWolf,”in BoylanandBoylan,Labored JourneyTo TheStars.Availableonlineat http://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html.

366.See Wolf,CatchersofHeaven.367.NerudaInterview #3,pages38–39;http://www.wingmakers.com.368.SeeAlBielakinterviewin1991:http://www.freezone.org/mc/

e_conv06.htm.369.The DayAfter Roswell, p. 93.370.For ananalysisof the institutionalculture of Reptilianspecies,see

CourtneyBrown, CosmicExplorers,178–224.371.TheresadeVeto, “FromDisinformationtoDisclosure,”SurfingTheApocalypse(October,2001).Availableonlineat:http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.com.372.“Quotations fromChairmanWolf” in Boylan andBoylan,LaboredJourneyto the Stars,availableonline at:http://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html.373.See RichardBoylan, “ColonelSteve Wilson, USAF(ret.)Reveals UFO-orientedProjectPounce,”availableonlineat: http://drboylan.com/swilson2.html.374.Forananalysisofthe institutionalcultureofZetaspecies,seeCourtneyBrown, CosmicExplorers.pages243–51. Seealso CosmicVoyage(OnyxBooks, 1997).375. Phil Schneider, “MUFON Conference Presentation, May 1995,” available online at:http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/coverup044.html.

203

http://www.nsc.gov

http://209.132.68.98/pdf/truman_forrestal.pdf

http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/history.html


http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/maji007.html

http://www.drboylan.com/bldrbg2.html




http://www.freezone.org/mc/




376.Videowith Schneider’scomments aboutNew World Order conspiracy is titled: “Phil Schneider’s Last Lecture(1995)”andcan bepurchasedfrom: http://educate-yourself.org/products/pslastlecturedescrip.shtml.377.SeeStewartSwerdlow,Montauk:TheAlienConnection;PrestonNichols&PeterMoon,MontaukRevisited;and Wade Gordon, The Brookhaven Connection. For an overview, see John Quinn, “Phoenix Undead: TheMontauk Project and Camp Hero Today.” (NewsHawk Inc, 1998). Available online at:http://vs03.tvsecure.com/~vs030f1/monew.htm.378.SeeStewart Swerdlow,Montauk:TheAlienConnection; PrestonNichols &Peter Moon, Montauk Revisited:AdventuresinSynchronicity; andWadeGordon,The BrookhavenConnection.

379.Cooper,BeholdaPale Horse.See also Cooper,“Origin,Identity andPurposeofMJ-12”: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/maji007.html.380. See William Cooper, Behold a Pale Horse; and Cooper, “Origin, Identity and Purpose of MJ-12”:http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/maji007.html.SeealsoMichaelWolf, TheCatchersofHeaven;andRichardBoylan,“OfficialWithinMJ-12UFO-SecrecyManagementGroupReveals Insider Secrets,”availableathttp://www.drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html.

381.See Michael Wolf,CatchersofHeaven.382.Fordiscussionofthemoreprogressivefactions inthePI40group,seeRichardBoylan, “RevelationsconcerningMJ-12,”availableonlineathttp://www.drboylan.com/mj12org2.html.383. See RichardBoylan, “Birds of a Feather No Longer: Pol icySplit Divides ‘Aviary’ UFO-SecrecyGroup,” in Boylan and Boylan, Labored Journey To The Stars. Available online at: http://www.drboylan.com/aviary2.html.

204

http://educate-yourself.org/products/pslastlecturedescrip.shtml

http://vs03.tvsecure.com/~vs030f1/


http://www.geocities.com/Area51/



Chapter5

USMotivationforPreemptiveWaragainst Iraq:StargateTechnologyandthe‘Returnofthe Gods’

IntroductionInhis2003Stateofthe Unionaddress,PresidentGeorgeW.Bush declared“thegravestdanger facingAmericaand theworld isoutlaw regimes that seek and possess nuclear,chemicalandbiologicalweapons.”384

In his speech, President Bush eloquently expressed his main motivation forlaunchingapreemptivewar againstIraq inorderto prevent“adayofhorrorlikenonewe have ever known.” Critics of President Bush’s preemptive policy, including thepolitical commentator, RobertFisk, argue the upcomingUS ledwar against Iraq “isn’taboutchemicalwarheadsor humanrights:it’saboutoil.”385

According to another prominent political commentator, Michael Lind, themotivationliesinthe preemptivemilitarydoctrinechampionedbyneo-conservativessuchasDeputyDefenseSecretaryPaulWolfowitz,whosepolicyviewsweregivenmoreprominenceaftertheSeptember11 attack.386

Most,ifnotall,criticismsoftheBushadministration’smotivationforgoingto warfocusonacombinationoftheimperialworldviewsofconservativepoliticiansinpowerinWashington DC, and corporate interests that drive the political agenda of the Bushadministration. This chapter will providea radically differentpolitical analysis of theBush administration’smotivationfor goingwar,andof the explanations offered byhiscritics.

206

Itwill beargued thatthefocusoneitherthefactors

supporting a preemptive war against an Iraq possessingweapons of massdestruction;oron criticisms againstUSimpe-rialismandcorporateinterests,are notsomuch wrong, but simply reflect a limited political paradigm for understanding themotivationsbehindUSforeignpolicy.

The politicalparadigmtobeused in analyzing themotiva- tionsfor the preemptivewar in Iraq isbasedon exopolitics.387Anexopolitical paradigm starts with the premise that thereexistsan extraterrestrial (ET)presence onEarthaboutwhichclandestine government organizations havebeenwithholdingknowledge from thegeneralpublicandelected publicofficials. Rather thanbeinganunsubstantiatedconspiracytheorywithlittle relevancetocontemporarypolicyissues such asapreemp-tive USwar againstIraq, an exopoliticalanalysiscanprovideamore comprehensive understanding of what motivates the Bush administration inlaunchingapreemptiveattackagainstIraq.

Exopoliticsas an emergingfield ofpublic policy isprimarilybasedon theevidenceprovided by a range of sources supporting the idea of an ET presence known byclandestine government organizations, who suppress this information from thegeneralpublicandelectedpoliticalleaders.Themostimpor-tantevidencecomesfromformer military and government officials who have come forward to give “whistleblower”testi-monyin a numberof non-governmental initiatives to promotedisclosureof theETpresence.388

Althoughmany disagree over the plausibility of the available evidence and takevariouspositionseitherfor or againsttheexistenceofan ETpresence and governmentnon-disclosureof thispresence, exopolitics isbased on the premise that such debateoughtnotpreclude discussionof the implicationsof such a presence. Therefore, whenoneexaminescontempo-rary international issue such as a US led preemptive war inIraq,one canexplore theviewpoints offeredby those using an exopolitical analysis.Thisallowsforamore comprehensiveunderstandingofforeignpolicy,irrespectiveofthe ongoingdebateover thepersuasivenessof theavailableevidence.

An exopolitical analysis is necessary, since those actively involved in a non-disclosure programwillusedisinformation,

207

intimidationandotherstrategiesto deterwitnesses,distortevidence,anddeterpublic attentionfrom theETpresenceandhowitpertainsto arangeofcontemporarypolicyissues.Finally, a clandestinecampaignof non-disclosureneedsto beconsidered in conducting exopolitical analysis in termsof the likelihood of thisinfluencing and/or compromising available empirical evidence that otherwise wouldconfirm anETpresence.

Therefore, exopolitical analysishassome keydifferencesfrom more conventionalapproachestopolitical analysis,whicharebased ona traditionalsocialscientificmethodof a valuefree, objective analysisof availableprocesses, institutionsand actors in thepublicpolicy arena.

Whatfollows in this chapterisan exopoliticalanalysisof ahistoricET presenceinIraqthathelpsexplainthemotivationforthe US ledpreemptiveattackonthe regime ofSaddamHussein.In conductingthisanalysis,Iwill firstexaminetheavailableevidenceof a historicalET presence in Iraq, and theexistence of “Stargate technology” and/orinformation.

I then analyze the motivations of the Bush administration in launching a US ledpreemptive war against Iraq, and the role played by Stargate technology and/orinformationfor thewar.What’stheEvidencefor aHistoricETPresenceinIraq?The strongest available evidence for a historical ET presence in Iraq comes fromcuneiform tablets directly recording the beliefs and activities of the ancient Sumerianswhosecivilization beganalmostovernight in 3800BC. Many of the more than 500,000cuneiformtabletsdiscovered thusfar, describestoriesof theSumeriansinteractingwiththeir “gods.”

Mostarcheologists initiallyaccepted that theseweremerely myths and attachedlittle importancetothemotherthangivinginsightintothe mytho-religiousbeliefsoftheancientSumerians.That viewpointreceivedamajorchallengein1976when theSumerianscholar,ZechariaSitchin, publishedthefirstofaseriesofbooksonhistranslationsofthousandsofSumeriantablets.389Rather than treatingthestoriesofthegods

208

visitingtheEarthas mythsthathadlittleempiricalrelevance,Sitchin interpretedthe tabletsas literal descriptionsof eventsas they occurredatthattime:

All theancientpeoples believed ingodswhohaddescendedtoEarth from theheavensand who couldatwillsoar heavenwards. But thesetaleswerenevergivencredibility,havingbeenbrandedby scholarsfromthevery beginningas myths . . .It has taken thirty years of research, ofgoing back to theancient sources, ofacceptingthemliterally, to re-create in my ownmindacontinuousandplausiblescenarioofpre-historicevents.390

Sitchin’stranslationsofSumeriancuneiformtablets revealedan advanced civilization

with many technological achievements across the spectrum of medicine, law,cosmology,economics,politics and social reform. Accordingtooneoftheworld’sleadingSumerian Scholars, Samuel Noah Kramer, theSumeriansachieved39 civilizational“firsts,” including: writing (cuneiform ),medical science, legal codes, social reforms,bicameralcongress,coinagesystem,cosmology,andcosmogony.391

Whatmost intrigued Sitchenwas that the Sumerians had precise information on arangeof topicsthathearguescouldnothavebeenpossiblefor a civilization at theinitialstagesofitsdevelopmentwithoutanexistingformercivilizationfromwhichtoborrow.According to Sitchin, the Sumerians haddetailed knowledge of all the planets in thesolar system. They understood the precession of the equinoxes and also had anunderstandingofcomplexmedicalprocedures.392

Sitchin’sclaimthatthe Sumerianswere aware ofall nineplanetsin thesolar systemis remarkable, given that the outer- most planets of Uranus and Neptune weren’tdiscovered untilthe 19thcentury, andPlutowasn’t discovereduntil the earlypartof the20thcentury.Even morestrikingisSitchin’s claimsconcerninga mysterioustenthplanet,Nibiru,thatreturnedtothesolar systemevery 3,600years.

Inthelate1970stwoastronomersfromtheUSNavalObservatory,TomvanFlandernandRichardHarrington,began

209

publishing a series of papers supportingtheexistenceofa10thplanetthataccountedfor theperturbationsof theouterplan-ets of the solarsystem.393HughMcCann,a sciencewriterfortheDetroitNewsstated: “If new evidence from theU.S.NavalObservatoryof a 10thplanetin thesolarsystemis correct, itcouldprovethattheSumerians. . .werefaraheadofmodernmaninastronomy.”394

TheInfraredAstronomicalSatellite(IRAS)discoveryin1983,of a large planetthatwascloseenoughto the suntobelongto the solarsystem,ispossibleconfirmationoftheSumerians’detailedknowledgeof all the planetsin thesolarsystem.395

Concerningthe Sumerians’accuratecalendarandknowl-edgeoftheprocessionoftheEquinoxes,AlanAlfordpointedout:

Theuncomfortable question which the scientistshave avoided isthis: how couldtheSumerians,whoseciviliza-tion onlylasted2,000years, possiblyhave observedandrecordedacelestial cycle that took 25,920years tocomplete? Andwhy didtheircivilization beginin themiddleofazodiacperiod?Is thisaclue that theirastronomywas a legacyofthegods?396

AstowheretheSumerianscouldhavegainedthis detailedknowledgeofplanetsin the

solarsystem,the precessionoftheequinoxesandotherpuzzling information,Sitchin’stransla-tions suggestthat theSumeriansprovideda clear answerfor itsultimatesource.Theyrevealedintheirtabletsthatalltheirknowledgecamefromaraceofextraterrestrialvisitors,the“Anunnaki”(“thosewhofromheavento Earthcame”) whowerenot onlyteachersfortheSumerians,but also playedaroleinthecreationof thehumanrace.397

According to Sitchin’s translations, the Anunnaki visited the earth approximately 450,000yearsago to establishminingoperationsforgoldneededon their homeworldafter a devas- tating damage to the atmosphere.According to Lloyd Pye, “theAnunnakisolutionwas todisperseextremelytinyflakes ofgoldinto their upperatmospheretopatchholes...Ironically,modernscientistscontendthatifwe areeverforcedto repairourown

210

damaged ozone layer, tinyparticulates ofgoldshotintotheupperatmospherewould bethebestwaytogoaboutit.”398

Another reasonwhy the Anunnaki may have sought to mine gold for their homeworld is the consciousness raising prop- erties of gold in its “monatomic state.”According to DavidHudson,who has patents on the preparation of metals in theirmonatomic states, monatomic goldwas used in the initiation rites of ancientmysteryschoolsand deliveredheightenedstatesofconsciousness.399 Hebelievesmonatomicgoldwasthe“manna”that sustainedtheancientHebrewsintheSinaidesert.

AnadvancedETrace,understandingtheuniquepropertiesofgoldin its monatomicstateas a form of mannafor sustain-inghigherstatesofconsciousness,may wellhave beenengaged in mining operations on worlds with an abundance of gold.Liberally diffused into the atmosphere of their home world—either to repair theatmosphereor to producemannafor all theplanet’s inhabitants—theremay havebeenapower-fulneedforgold.

After generationsof mininggoldaroundtheplanet, therewas an apparent rebellionamongtheAnunnakiworkersanditwas decidedthataslave/workerrace would becreatedtocon-tinuetheminingoperations.Humanitywas reportedlycreatedfrom a mixtureoftheAnunnaki DNAand primatesthenpresenton Earth.

Created asaslaveworkerrace,the Anunnakiapparentlydifferedgreatlyabouthow totreatthehumanrace.Somepre-ferred to keephumanity in ignorance soas to performtheirmenialmining operations, butotherAnunnaki desiredtoassisthumanity to evolveand develop more sophisticated modes of collective life. The Garden of Eden was ametaphorforcompet-ing ETfactionswho eitherwanted tokeephumanity in its stateofignorance(Jehovah-Enlilfaction)orgiveknowledgetohumans(Serpent-Enkifaction).

The homeworld of the Anunnaki, the Nibiru (planet of the crossing), had a longelliptical journeyaround the sun,andreturns to this region of the solar system every3,600years.400Itwould beupontheperiodicreturnsoftheNibiru that thefac-tional conflict betweentheAnunnaki would reach new degrees of intensity. This would be due to both Nibiru’sproximityand

211

thegravitational/electromagneticforcesreleasedby itspassagethroughthesolarsystemthatbringsabouttremendouschangesbothforEarth andNibiru itself.401

WhenSitchin’sinnovativeworkwasfirstpublished,itimmediatelyraisedgreatcontroversyandintensedebatebetweenthoseeitherfor or againsthismain thesisof ahistoric ET presence in Sumer that was responsible for starting the remarkable Sumeriancivilization.AmongthoserespondingfavorablytoSitchin’sthesisincludedestablishedpopularauthorssuch as ErikVonDaniken,who in1969,hadwrittenthebestselling book,Chariotsof theGods.

VonDanikenproposed a historicET presence in different parts of the planet.402 William Bramley’s,Gods of Eden, also proved to be popular in his analysis of thehistoricroleof ETraces,as hasR.A.Boulay’s, Flying SerpentsandDragons:TheStoryofMankind’sReptillian Past.403

Less well-knownauthors/independent archaeologists suchasWilliamHenryandAlanAlfordhave similarlypublishedbookssupporting Sitchin’s thesis.404 On theotherhand,a num-ber of critics objectedtoSitchin’stranslationsofkey terms,andhis literalapproachtointerpretingSumeriancuneiformtexts.405

To support Sitchin’s thesis, many authors typically cite biblical texts that makereferenceto the“gods” thatresidedonEarthandinteractedwithhumanity.ThebiblicaltextmostreferredtoistheapocryphalbookofEnoch.406

AlthoughtheBook ofEnoch was excludedinmostversionsoftheOldTestament,itwasnevertheless part ofancientHebrew scholarship and indeed is included in theEthiopian andSlavic versionsof the Old Testament. The Book of Enoch describes arebel group of angels, the “Nephilim,” who num- bered 200, settled the Earth andinterbred withthe humanpopulationbeforebeingrecalledandpunishedby their superi-ors, the“Elohim.”407

[Ch.6]1And it cametopasswhenthechildrenof menhad multiplied that in thosedays wereborn unto 2thembeautifulandcomelydaughters. Andthe angels, thechildrenof theheaven,saw andlustedafterthem,andsaid tooneanother:“Come,letuschooseuswivesfrom

212

among the children of men 3 andbegetus children.”AndSemjaza, whowas their leader, said unto them: “I fear ye willnot 4 indeedagreetodothis deed,andIaloneshall havetopay thepenaltyof a greatsin.” Andtheyall answered himandsaid:“Letusall swearanoath,andall bindourselvesbymutual imprecations 5not to abandon thisplanbut to do this thing.” Then sworetheyalltogether andboundthemselves6bymutualimprecationsuponit. And theywere in all two hundred; who descended in the days of Jared on the summit ofMountHermon, and theycalled it MountHermon,because theyhadsworn 7 andboundthem-selvesbymutualimprecationsuponit.

[Ch.7]1And alltheotherstogetherwiththemtook untothemselveswives, andeachchosefor himself one,andthey begantogoinunto themand todefile themselveswiththem,and they taughtthemcharms 2and enchant-ments, and thecutting ofroots,andmadethemacquaintedwith plants.And they3 became pregnant,andtheybare great giants,whoseheightwasthreethousandells:Whoconsumed4 allthe acquisitions ofmen.And when men could no longer sustain them, the giantsturnedagainst5 themanddevoured mankind.Andtheybegan to sin againstbirds,andbeasts,andreptiles,and6 fish, andtodevourone another’s flesh,anddrinktheblood.Thenthe earthlaidaccusationagainstthelawless ones.408

TheBookofEnochprovides contextual background formysterious verses in the

Book of Genesis which describes a time when the “sons of gods,” theNephilim/Anunnaki, inter-bred with humanity,andcreated a race of giants/heroes thatruled over the rest of humanity. The following passage from theBook of Genesis, isclearly a summaryfrom thelongeraccountfoundin theBook of Enoch:“TheNephilimwereon theearthinthosedays—andalsoafterwards—whenthe sonsofGodwenttothedaughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men ofrenown.”409

213

Supportersof theSitchin thesissay thatthis ispartof the

biblical evidence that an advanced ET race did in fact exist on Earth, had a longinteractionwithhumanity,andevenplayedarole inthecreationof thehumanrace.410

The greatest support for Sitchin’s thesis, according to the evidentiary criteriaestablished in the first chapter, are a number of former participants in clandestinemilitary/intelligence projects involving ET races that played a role in the creation ofhumanity.

AccordingtoStewartSwerdlow,a giftedpsychicwhowasrecruitedinto thetopsecretprojectestablished attheMontaukNaval/Air force facility, theETraces thatestablishedthehumanrace,includingthe Anunnakireferred bySitchin,continue toplay a powerfulrole inhumanaffairs.411

Anotherparticipantin theinfamousMontaukexperiments,AlBielak, also describedanumberofETracesassistingintheseclandestine military projects,amongwhom was aReptilian race from Orion commonly associated with the Anunnaki.412 In the mostextensive collection of literature available on clandestinegovernment projects involvingETracesandtechnology,ValdamarValeriandetailsinformationgainedfrominterviewswithwhistleblowers and government insiders concerning the historic andcontemporaryrole playedbyETReptilian speciesininfluencinghumanaffairs.413

In addition to the growing number of independent archaeologists, biblicalcommentators and whistleblowers coming forward to support Sitchin’s thesis, aburgeoning numberof indi-vidualsclaim to be in telepathic communication with ETraceswhorevealinformationonthehistoricET presencein Sumer.The mostprominentamongtheseisBarbaraMarciniak, whose“channeledworks”onthe historicET presenceonEarthis aseminalsourceof informationintheNew Age community.414

Anotherofthese ET “channels”isJelailaStarr,whoisdistinguishedbyherclaimto be intouchwithbeingsfromNibiru itself.Starr regularlyreleasesonline informationfrom theAnunnaki themselves on her website.415 She “channels” advice from theAnunnakielite,theNibiruanCouncil, which i sdesigned toassist globalhumanity inlearning of its ETheritage and consciously evolve as a race. She describes how theleadersoftheAnunnaki,thebrothersEnlilandEnki,whomthe

214

Sumerianslaterworshippedasgods,decided to resolvetheproblem:

Around 250,000 B.C., the astronauts in Africa mutinied. Dissatisfied with mininggoldin thehotinteriorof theearth, theyhadreached the breakingpointand joinedtogetherina revolt.

Enki called Enlil to notify him of the situation. When Enlil arrived at the miningoperation,theAnunnakitookhimhostage.Enki,althoughsidingwith theAnunnaki,asked his men to release Enlil,which they did. Enlil accused Enki of inciting andencouraging the Anunnaki and wanted him brought up on charges before theCouncil.Bothbrothers returned toNibiru tospeakbeforetheCouncil. Itwas decidedthat the Anunnaki weremore valuable doingthe jobs they were trained for thanmininggold.Enkibelievedthesolutionwastocreateaworker race tominethegold....So Enki,beingamastergeneticistas wellasanengineer,alongwithNinhursag,retired tothelaboratoryinShuruppaktocreatetheworkers.416

Anotherpopular“channel”isSheldanNidle, who claims tobecommunicating with

an ETracefrom thestar systemSirius,andgivesextensive information on the historicpresenceandinfluenceof theAnunnakiinhisbooksandwebsite.417

There is great controversy over the extent to which such a disparate collection ofevidentiary sources can substantiate the Sitchin thesis of a historic ET presence inSumer.Ofthesesources,the whistleblowertestimonies,whilerelativelyfew,standoutas giving powerfulsupporttoSitchin’sthesis.

Despite the controversy generated by such sources,they provide a wealth ofinformation and plausibility that mer- its closer examination in terms of their publicpolicyimplica-tions.Giventhatexopoliticsis based onthe premiseofanET presencethatis subjectto non-disclosurebyclandestinegovernmentorganizations,it is possibletoprovidean exopo-liticalperspectiveonSitchin’sthesisdespitetheongoingdebateoverthe consistencyandaccuracyofthe availableevidence.

215

The HistoricETPresence,StargatesandUSpolicy inIraqAnindependentarchaeologistwhodiscussesadirectlinkbetween the ancientETpresenceinSumer(southernIraq) andthe US motivationformilitaryinterventioninIraq,is William Henry. Henry’s main thesis is that there existed in Sumerian timesatechnological devicewhich he describes as a “Stargate,” thattheAnunnaki/Nephilim usedasaninterdimensionalandtime-spacetraveldevicefor movingaboutthegalaxyand intohigher dimensions.418 Henryfocuses on the following scene described bySitchin’sinterpretationof a cuneiformtabletof anUrukritual text:

Depictionshavebeen foundthatshowdivinebeingsflankingatempleentranceandholdinguppolestowhich ring-like objectsareattached.The celestialnatureof thescene is indicated by the inclusion of the symbols of the Sun and the Moon . . .depictingEnlilandEnkiflanking agateway throughwhichAnu ismaking a grandentrance.419

RatherthanasimpletemplesceneinvolvingthechiefAnunnaki oftheSumerians,Anuand histwo sons, Enliland Enki,Henryproposesthat the abovescenerepresents atransporta-tion deviceusedby Anu andothersfrom theeliteAnunnaki.Ifso,thensuchadeviceislikelyto havebeen locatedinaSumeriancitysuchasUruk,foundingcityofthe Sumerian civilization and the home of Gilgamesh, the famed king of the Epic ofGilgamesh.420

Whistleblowertestimoniessupporttheexistenceof“Stargates”as a modeoftransportation used by ET races that is part of the exotic technologies currently underdevelopmentbyclandestineorganizationsintheUSandelsewhere.421 Dr. RichardBoylan,whohasanumberof“insider”contactsrevealedthefollowing abouttheUSgovernment’sStargatetechnology,whichispartofaclassifiedprogramcalled“ProjectGalileo”:

Anex-NSAconsultantwhohasbeen reliableinthepastinformsmethatgovernmentscientistsworkingat

216

Los Alamos “Nuclear” Laboratory,NMhave succeededin generating a holographic portal [a “Stargate”]. They have used this portal totravel across space-time, and possibly interdimensionally, and have seen intoanother world. What they saw there, my informant says crypti- cally, bothfrightenedandintriguedthem.Hedidnotadd anyadditionaldetails.This researchwouldbe afollow-ontoprevioussecretgovernmentsuccessfulresearchinto timetravel and teleportation. Los Alamos physicist Robert Lazar told about thegovernment’sProjectGalileoresearchintotimetravel,whichhewas briefedonwhen heworkedattheS-4Base southofArea 51. My NSA contactconfirmedthatthe govern-menthassucceeded in time travel,butalsoconsiders it a dangeroustechnology.Teleportationresearchcon-ductedattheLawrenceLivermore/SandiaNationalLaboratories, CA has had some successful results, as well. Certainextraterrestrialraceshavebeenusingportalsoftheirowndevisingto visit earth.NowtheU.S. government,everavariciousto copyET technol-ogy,hascreatedaprimitivebutworkingmodelofitsown.422

Dr. Boylan argues that the Stargate technology was the true reason behind the

prosecutionofthe nuclearscientist,Dr.WenHo Lee,whomostlikelycompromised,insomeway,theclandestineStargatetechnologyunderdevelopment:

Dr.WenHo Lee, nuclear scientist in the headlines, worked on that holographicportalproject,alongwithotherscientists.Youwillrecall thatDr.Leewas accusedbythe government of copying U.S. “nuclear secrets” onto a non-secure computertape. In thepreviously-lax security environment of the professorial LosAlamosLabs,runbythe UniversityofCalifornia,andaccus-tomedtoinformalexchangeofinformationamongresearchcolleagues,such“lapsesofsecurity”havebeenepidemic. If every LANLscientist who took short- cuts around certain securitymeasureswereprosecuted,

217

Los Alamoswouldbe aghost town.Why,then,wasWen Ho Lee singled out for such severe and unconstitu- tional nine months ofimprisonment withoutbail and defamation-by-headlines? What doesDr. Leeknowabout portal secrets, that the government used the severestmeasures tosilenceanddiscredithim?423

Anumberof individualsclaimingtohaveparticipatedin aclandestineNavy project

thathasits rootsin the Philadelphiaexperiment and latermoved to the Montauk jointNaval/Air Force facility, state thatmanipulating time and spacewas the focus of theexperiments.AccordingtoAlBielak,thePhiladelphiaexperimentwas madepossibleby theapplicationof ET technologyacquired by the US Navy to moveobjects throughtime-spaceandinterdimensionally.

Thistechnology,accordingtoBielak,wasbothcovetedandfeared bythe US militarywhowere aware ofitsincrediblepotentialfor manipulatingthe very fabricof timeandspace,and changingthecourseofhistory bymanipulatingkeyhistoricevents.424

Preston Nichols, who claims to have been a director of the Montauk project,summarized the history of the Philadelphia experiment and the Montauk project asfollows:

Theoriginof the MontaukProject dates back to 1943when radar invisibilitywasbeingresearchedaboardtheUSSEldridge.As theEldridridgewas stationedat thePhiladelphia Navy Yard, the events concerning the ship have commonly beenreferredtoas: the“PhiladelphiaExperiment.”Theobjectiveof thisexperimentwastomake theship undetectable toradarand while thatwasachieved, there was atotallyunexpectedanddrasticside effect.

Theshipbecameinvisibleto the nakedeyeandwasremovedfrom time andspaceas we know it!Althoughthiswas a remarkablebreakthroughintermsof technol-ogy, itwasacatastrophetothepeopleinvolved. Sailorshadbeentransportedoutofthisdimensionand

218

returned in a state of completementaldisorientationandhorror.Somewereevenplantedinto thebulkheadoftheship itself.

Those who survived weredischargedas “mentallyunfit”orotherwise discreditedand theentireaffairwascoveredup. After thewar, research continued under thetutelageof Dr. JohnvonNeumannwhohaddirected the technical aspects of thePhiladelphiaExperiment.His new orderswereto find out what made themind ofman tick andwhypeoplecouldnot besubject to inter-dimensional phenomena withoutdisaster.Amassivehumanfactorstudywas begunatBrookhavenNationalLaboratorieson Long Island, New York.Itwasknown asthePhoenixProject.425

JamissonNeruda,whoclaimsto be adefectorfromaclandestineorganization

embedded within the NationalSecurity Agency, states that the most secret andpowerfultechnologycurrentlyunderdevelopmentby theNSAconcernsthemanipulationand controlof time-space.Significantly, controlofsuchtechnologygivesthe capacityfordefenseagainstaggressorETraces; and,by implication, thecapacity toconquerETraces:

BlankSlate Technology[BST]...isa form of time travelthatenablesthe re-writeof historyatwhatare calledinterventionpoints.Interventionpointsare the causalenergycentersthat createamajor event likethebreak-upof theSoviet Union or theNASAspaceprogram.“BSTis the mostadvanced technology andclearlyanyonewhois inpossessionofBST, candefendthemselvesagainstanyaggressor.”426

If the above testimonies are an accurate reflection of the advanced travel

technologyusedbyvarious ETraces,thenitisclearthata“Stargate” orsimilarET basedtechnology that facilitates travel through time-space and/or different “dimensions”wouldbe amongthe mosthighlyprizedandvalued

219

of technologies.Indeed,whoeverwas tobeincontrolof suchtechnology,wouldhavethemeansof conqueringand/orpro-tectingavast numberofcivilizedworlds throughoutthegalaxy.

Indeed, reports from “supersoldiers”such as Michael Relfe,Andy Pero and “Jared”provide evidence of the existence of an elite space military force. This force visits ETworlds and engages in combat with different ET races using Stargate related traveltechnologythatechoes thepopular televisionseriesand movie,Stargate.427A particularlyvivid experienceis recountedin aninterviewwith the“roguesupersolider”Jared:

InonecombatsituationI was involved in time travel to the future in deep spacesomewhere with a groupofothers.Oneof thepersonswho sharedthis experiencewith mesays theyear was sometimearound2032. Weweresenttoa planetcalledKalmine somewhereoutintheuniverse.

The species inhabiting this planet were called Zomba’s. They are a skeletal typecreatureabouthumanaverageheightand a strangesolid lower jawthat could openfarenoughtodropdown totheir chests.Reallyweird looking. An entiremilitaryforce was senthereby time shut-tle.Thousandsof us includingfemalewarriorsas well. We were in full combat gear, fatigues, helmets, etc. Our weaponry consisted of fullarmada with tanks, half trucks, theworks andall armed to theteeth.

All of these vehicles were very fast even on this rocky terrain due to all beingatomicpowered.Weallcarriedlaser weaponsorpulsingweaponsand thesamewithallthevehicles.Thisplanet’s terrainwas rocky, craggywithno visible structuresofanykind. Inever sawanytreesorvegetationlikehereon eartheither.Wewerein alow-lyingarea withthese creatures uponhighergroundfightingus.

As wewouldfireourlasersat themandhitthemitwouldn’tkillthemimmediately.What itwould doislockontothemandtheywouldgive off this bloodcurdling

220

screamandbounceandjerk all overtheplace,so youhad to holdyour weapon rightuntil it died. It seemed like it would take foreverbefore it diedbut reallywas only amatter of seconds butwith the air and all itseemedforever.

Thisplanetwasoxygenatedsowedid not have towearsuits or masksor anythingfor protection.That was thestrangethingaboutitas towhyI didn’tunderstandnotseeingany vegetationof any kind. AsI saidwe arrivedbya time shuttlethroughawormhole createdand spedthroughatthespeedofinfinityso thatiswhyitispossi-ble to go anywherethrough the universe in split seconds. Themainmethod oftime travelwas to literallywalk physically through a vortex.We would just jumpinto thevortexor “wormhole.”Wecalledit“ShootingtheVort.”

We preferred the vortex over the time shuttle because it was so beautiful andfascinatingtosailthrough,almostidenticaltowhat you saw in themovieContact,exceptitwas not contained,we justwent throughit.428

Sitchinmissedthe significanceof the Stargate in his owntranslations of the above

texts and investigations of ET transportation, since he clearly operated in a“conventional paradigm” where transportation occurs through rocket propelledvehicles.429 Sitchin’sfocus was on rocketpropelled spacecraft inhis description of theAnunnakiandtheirvarioustripstoandfrom theEarth.

For example, describing the transportation used by the Anunnaki in movingbetweentheir earthand spacebasedloca-tions,Sitchinwrote:“Thetextsrevealthat threehundred ofthem—The“AnunnakiofHeaven,”orIgig—weretrueastro-nautswho stayedaboardthespacecraftwithoutactuallyland-ingonEarth.OrbitingEarth,these spacecraftlaunchedandreceivedtheshuttlecraft toandfrom Earth.”430

Itthereforecan beconcludedthatthereweretwo forms oftransportationusedby theAnunnaki. Onewas a form of rockettechnologyfamiliarto us,whichwasused by theresident

221

Anunnaki onEarth. Sitchindescribedtheseas the“rank and fileAnunnaki”who administeredtheEarth and humanityaccordingtothedictatesof theirspacebasedcompatriots.431

Anothertransportationtechnologywas a “Stargate”whichfacilitated travel throughtime-spaceanddifferentdimensions.ThistechnologywaspresumablyusedonlybytheeliteAnunnaki,whodispensed the tasksof harvesting the Earth’s resources to theresident and space based Anunnaki (lesser gods/rebel angels). Interpreting theBabylonianEpico fCreation,one gainsanideaof the way taskswere assigned,basedonthe hierarchyofthe Anunnaki,withthe “supremegod”Marduk,dispensingtasks tohissubordinateAnu, chief oftheAnunnaki:

Assigned to Anu, to heed his instructions, Three hundred in the heavens hestationedasaguard;thewaysofEarth todefinefrom theHeaven;AndonEarth, Sixhun- dred he made reside. After he all their instructions had ordered, to theAnunnakiof Heavenandof Earthheallottedtheir assignments.432

Thus the Anunnaki operated outposts both on Earth and in Space to maintain their

controlover the planet.Given the stricthierarchyof authoritydescribed by Sitchin in hisdetailedanalysisofthe Anunnakiandtheirinteractionswithone anotherandhumanity,it islikely that Stargate technology, due to its power and potential to act as a gateway forinterdimensional/time travel, would have been strictly monitored and off-limits to theresidentAnunnaki andhumanitywho couldonlyobserveitsoperation.

Due to the nature of Stargates as an advanced form of time-space andinterdimensional transportation, there would have been only a limited number ofStargatesaroundtheplanetdependingon the differentETracesvisiting or residingonthe Earth. The Sumerian Stargate would most likely have been located in the mostimportant of the ancient Sumerian cities—the ancient capital of Uruk, home of theancientkings,which islocatedinSouthernIraq.

Significantly,aftera 12-yearlull in excavations,a teamofGermanresearchersin2002 resumedexcavationsintheburied

222

city of Uruk. Using a magnetometer which isabletodetectthepresence of man-made objectsbeneath the soil, and a powerful computer system inGermany, German geophysicists were able to map out the buried structures of thesprawlingancientcapitalof5.5km2thatwaswhereSumeriancivilizationbegan.433

Animportanteventin the Sumerian descriptions of theAnunnaki was thelatter’sfinaldeparturefrom theplanetduringaseriesofcataclysmiceventsthatculminatedin theperiod1800–1700BC.434 Indeed,conventionalarcheologistssupporttheviewthattherewasaregionalcataclysmiceventthatoccurredat thattime.435Ifin factthere were twomodesoftransportationusedbythe Anunnakiwhenmostofthe resi-dent/lesserAnunnakileftbyconventionalrocketships,eliteAnunnakimostlikelyleft by theStargateandcloseditdown.

Predictably,giventheadvancedtechnologyoftheStargate,itwould not havebeenleft unprotected in theinterimperiod between theirdeparture and its reactivationwith the prophesied return of the Anunnaki. Different religious/cultural traditionssuggest that this departure was a planet wide phenomenon, setting in place theexpectationthatthe “gods”wouldeventuallyreturn.ProphesiedReturnof theGods/AnunnakiDifferent religious/cultural traditions, such as Judaism,Christianity, Mayan,Buddhist and others describe an “end times” when there will be a rapid transitionthroughouttheplanettovarious forms of “divinegovernance.”This“return todivinegovernance” varies tremendously in terms of the key concepts and beliefs of thedifferentreligionsandcultures,butessentiallymeans the end of materialisticgovernanceand the beginning of a “golden age” where “divine governance” is made possiblethroughtheinterventionof God-likebeingsinhumanaffairs.

Forthe ancientworldofthe Sumerians,these God-likebeingsweretheAnunnaki. Inthecontemporaryera, such aphe-nomenonisdescribedin theguiseof a singleperson,e.g.,the

223

Christ, the Buddha, the Messiah, etc., whobringsaboutdivinegovernance of a regionor theplanet.Contemporary interest in these prophecies is therecentendof thesecondmillenniuminthe Gregoriancalendar(2000),andthe endoftheMayanCalendarscheduledfor2012.

Theseeventshavesparkedanticipationofa“returnofdivinegovernance”andtheend of the materialistic beliefsystems that adherents of religious traditions, orNewAgebeliefssystems,claim limitthedivine potentialof individuals.

Thenotionof a “prophesiedreturn”in thecontextof theformerAnunnaki presencevaries inmeaningaccordingtothreedifferentperspectives.The firstperspectiveis basedsimply ontheidea of theAnunnaki physically returning toresumea promi-nent role ininfluencinghumanaffairs andoverseeingtheuse ofresourcesof theplanet.436 In suchascenario,the first waveofAnunnakiwouldpresumablyarrivein time to create favorableconditionsfor theanticipatedreturnof theAnunnaki elite.

This mightinvolve,for example, the lesserAnunnaki first returning andactivatingthe SumerianStargate orachievingglobalinfluenceoverkey nationalgovernments thatwould be required for the return of the Anunnaki elite. Presumably, this would beheraldedas asacredeventthat shouldbecelebratedby allhumanity.

Theauthors, Clive PrinceandLyn Picknett, argue persua- sively in the book, TheStargate Conspiracy, that there has been an identifiable chain of global eventsinvolvingkeyreligiousandpolitical actorspreparinghumanityfor just such areturn.437Their view is thatthewhole“end times”phenome-nonis theproductof a centuriesoldprogrammingof humansto prepare themforatimewhenhumaneliteswouldhandoverpoliticalpowerto higherdimensional beingssuch as the Anunnaki. TheAnunnakiwould presumably then bring about a return of divine governance by removingrecalcitrantpoliticalleaders,andappointingtheirowndivinelyguidedhumanproxiestogovernhumanityin accordtoa newglobalreligion.

The danger, according to Prince and Picknett, is that such a system of divinegovernancewouldessentiallylimit individualself-expressionofreligiosity/spiritualityandperpetuatea

224

globalreligion.Thiswould allowhumanitytobesubtly exploitedby ETraces.438

Thesecondperspectiveonthe“returnofthegods/Anunnaki”isthereturnof theirhomeworld, theplanetNibiru. Indeed,much interest has been generated by a range ofbooksandonlinewebsitesdevoted to the topicofthe returnofNibiru, thehomeworldof theAnunnaki.439

Many authors cite a variety ofastronomical evidence supporting the ideaof atenthplanetthathas longbeenspec-ulatedtoinfluencetheorbits ofUranus and Neptuneever since it was found that Pluto (discovered in 1930) could not account for theseperturbations. Asmentioned earlier, in the late 1970s two astronomers from the USNavalObservatory,TomvanFlandernandRichardHarringtonbeganpublishinga seriesofpaperssupportingtheexistenceofa tenthplanet.440

Themostwidely citedreferenceto supportthe thesisof atenthplanet that isknownbut not released tothegeneralpublic,is a seriesof press releases by the astronomicalteam that was searching a part of the sky based on calculations by van Flandern andHarringtonsuggestingwherethetenthplanetwas located.

In December 1983, the chief astronomer in charge of the Infrared AstronomicalSatellite(IRAS)run by theJetPropulsionLaboratory,Dr.Gerry Neugebauer,announcedpossibleconfir-mationofsuch aplanet.TheWashingtonPost reportersumma-rizing theannouncementwrote:“[a]heavenlybodypossiblyaslargeas . . . Jupiterandpossibly. . .partof this solarsystemhas beenfoundinthedirectionof theconstellationofOrion byan orbitingtelescope. . .”441

After a total of six major newspapers covered the announcement, there was aretraction of the announcement and public silence by astronomers on the possibleexistence of a tenth planet. Rumors began to emerge about an active campaign ofsuppressionofinformationandintimidationbyclandestinegovernmentorganizations.442

Forexample, one ofthe astronomers at the USNavalObservatory, Dr. RichardHarrington, spoke publicly andwrote articles on the hypothetical planetX. There hasbeenspecula-tionthatthisdirectlycontributedto hisuntimelydeath by“naturalcauses”in1992.443

225

Athirdperspectiveon whatthe“prophesiedreturnof the

gods/Anunnaki” meanscan be found in authorswho focuson the significance of theupcomingend ofthe currentMayan5,200year cycle. AccordingtoJohnMajor Jenkins,theMayanswereawareof theway thesolar ecliptic planecomesinto align-mentwith thegalacticplaneonperiodicbasis.Thismakesitpossiblefor more intensecosmicenergiesto reachthe earthfrom thegalacticcore.

A corresponding increase or decrease in the level of human consciousness thenoccurs;partsof thebraineithergoonlineoroff-line,as these Mayancyclesgo throughtheirdifferentphases. Accordingto Jenkins,the year2012corresponds to the end ofthe currentMayancycleandwillleadto arapidtransformationofglobalconsciousness.444

Numerousauthorsreferto thisasaNewAgeofmoreenlightened global thinkingandincreasedhumanpotential.445The“prophesied returnof the gods” may therefore signify a rapid growth in humanconsciousnessas dormantpartsof thebrain comeon linewhen thesolar ecliptic alignswiththegalac-ticplane.

In this explanation, humanity itself would develop “god- like” powers whichspontaneously becomeaccessibleto largenumbersof humanity.A numberof authors,for example, have been describing the amazing abilities and psychic powers of anincreasingnumberofchildrenworldwide.446

In sum, the available information on the “prophesied return of the gods” can beunderstood to signify an important mile-stone in the growth ofhuman civilization.The “prophesied return” can be interpreted either literally or metaphorically to meaneitheraphysicalreturnofthe “gods”/Anunnaki;thereturnofamysterious10thplanetto the solarsystem;orarapidgrowthinthe consciousness ofhumanity as the solarplanecomesinto alignmentwith thegalacticplane.

Despitethecontroversyover what preciselysuch a“proph-esiedreturn”signifies,thefactors in such a return thatmost pertain to the preemptive military intervention thatoccurredinIraqin March2003,canbe identifiedandanalyzed.Thefirstfactoris thatanETtransportationdevice,a Stargate,or someotherimportantETartifact,may havelainburiedin thedesert

226

ofSouthernIraq which presumablywouldplay akeyrole inthe“prophesiedreturnofthe gods.”Second,it is possiblethattherewillbea returnof atenthplanetthatplays a critical rolein returnof theAnunnaki and/orwhich significantlyimpactsontheglobalenvironment.

The significance of Iraq, in terms of its location, may p l a ya key role inpreparationsfor whatevercontingenciesemergefromthe appearanceofsuchaplanet.Finally,there isthepotentialfor arapidacceleration ofhumanconsciousness as theendofthe MayanCalendar,2012,approaches.Again,Iraqmayplayacritical role insuchanelevationofhumanconsciousness.ExopoliticalAnalysis ofUSMotivationfor PreemptiveWar inIraq

Basedonavailableevidence,significantETartifactsmightbelocatedinIraq, derivingfrom thehistoric Anunnaki presenceinthatcountry.AnyETtechnologyleft behindwaslikelytohavebeenrelatedtoaStargateand/orothertransportationdevicesthat would

playarole ina“prophesiedreturnoftheAnunnaki.”Inaddition,manyof thecuneiformtextsthatwere storedeitherin Iraq’sNationalmuseumor arestillawaitingdiscoveryinvariousundergroundsites,mayhavecontainedimportantinformationon “Stargate

technology”and/oron the“returnoftheAnunnaki.”

It is likely thatclandestine government organizations thatstrongly influence if notcontrol the Bush administration, were aware of the existence and role of thesetechnologies, and the possible information stored on Sumerian cuneiform texts con-cerningStargatesandthereturnof theAnunnaki.

Iraq’sformerPresident,SaddamHussein,mostlikely hadalso becomeawareofsuchaSta rgate’sexistenceor informationconcerningthereturnof theAnunnaki,as mightbeinferred by his architectural projects intent on reviving the grandeur of earlyMesopotamian civilizations, and cementing his place as therestorer of Iraq’s pastglory.447 In the 1980sSaddamreportedlyspent$500million onrestorative projects ofIraq’sBabylonian

227

heritage,andevenensuredthatthecenterbrick on everywallwasinscribedwiththewords:“ThiswasbuiltbySaddamHussein,son ofNebuchadnezzar,toglorifyIraq.”448

Significantly,Saddam’spermissionfor aGermanteamofarchaeologiststo resumeexcavationsin theSumeriancity ofUruk afterdetailedundergroundmapping,suggeststhat this was possibly the location of the Sumerian Stargate, and/or important informationconcerningtheoperationofsuchtechnologyandthe prophesiedreturnof the Anunnaki.Thisknowledge of a buried Stargate or other significant ETartifactswith advancedmodesof transportationor knowledgeconcerningthese,wasalso likely to have been part o fthe reason why the German, French and Russiangovernmentswerepublicly opposedtoaUS-led preemptivewaragainstIraq.

Ifinfact boththeHusseinregimeandtheBush administra-tionbelievedthataStargateorStargate-related informationwas buriedin thesandsof SouthernIraq or elsewhere inIraq,thenthere wasmostlikely a raceto gainaccessto it and tocontrol it [geopoliticalevents supporting the existence of such a racewill be explored in the next chapter].William Henry’s thesis is that this is indeed the political underpinning of thesubsequentmilitary conflict inIraq.449

From theperspectiveof theBush administration, controlof the Sumerian Stargate,other ET and/or Sumerian cuneiform texts with information on Stargates and thepossiblereturnoftheAnunnaki,would enableclandestinegovernmentorganiza-tions tocontinuetheir globalcampaignofnon-disclosureoftheETpresence.450 This policy ofnon-disclosure is clearly impliedby theBush administration’spenchant for secrecy andoverturn- ingmany of the Freedom of Information initiatives from the earlier Clintonadministration.451

Controlof theStargate,inadditiontoany otherStargatesorrelatedET artifactsandinformationthatmayhavebeenestablishedin the capitalsof otherancientcivilizations,e.g., theEgyptian, Incan and Aztec, would presumably give clandestine government organizations greater leverage with ET races that are presently interacting with theplanet,or are predicted toarrive on the scene in a seriesof eventsassociated with the“prophesiedreturnof thegods.”

228

Attheveryleast,controloftheSumerianStargateor

knowledge about the operation of Stargate technology would allow clandestine governmentorganizationstodictatethepaceof globaltransformationsthatETracespromisetointro-duceto the Earthwiththeiradvancedtechnology,superiorknowledgeandheightenedpsychicabilities.

Controlof a Stargateor Stargaterelated informationwouldhaveallowedSaddam toeitheractivateit andto fulfillproph-esyby facilitatingthe returnof anadvancedraceofETs, theeliteAnunnaki;orpassonStargaterelatedinformationtofriendly statessuch asRussia, Franceand/orGermany.

Saddamlikelyimaginedthatin returnfor his loyalty totheeliteAnunnaki,hewouldhavebeen rewardedwith a positionofgreatglobalauthority.Perhapshe evensaw himselfas somekindof humansaviorfacilitatingthe returnof the gods whowouldsolveall ofhumanity’sproblems,andend the ruleofclandestine government organizations perpetuatingnon-disclosureof theETpresence.

Significantly, Europeangovernments such as Germany,France andRussia weregiving themselves greater leverage in the future control of the Stargate or gainingStargate relatedinformation,byofferingdiplomaticcoverfortheSaddamregimeasaquidproquoforallowingthe resumptionofarchaeologicaldigginginUrukandanyother clandestineprojects in Iraq in which theywere involved. These govern-ments andtheclandestineorganizationsassociatedwiththemthathaveaccesstoknowledgeof the ET presence, have deep suspicion about the willingness of the US to shareinformationaboutand controlover a Stargateand/orany otherETartifacts discoveredinIraq[again, thiswillbeexploredinthenext chapter].

Sitchin’sthesisof anancientET presencein Sumercom-binedwith thenotionof avariety of ET transportation devices described by other authors in their research ofancient civilizations, the existence of Stargate technologies revealed by formerparticipants inclandestine government projects, andresumption of archaeologicalexcavations of the first Sumerian capitalUruk in 2002,givesupport to the idea that aStargatewas buriedinthesandsofsouthernIraq.

229

The informationprovidedbyformerparticipantsinStargate

experiments suggest thatsuch technology notonly exists,but is at the pinnacle of theexotic arsenals possessed by clandestine organizations associated with differentnational governments. Whoever controlled such technology, if such testimonies areaccurate, literally had a means for controlling life not only on Earth, but also otherplanets. The existence of Stargate or related technology in Iraq provides importantcontextual information for understanding the true motivations of the Bushadministration in launching the preemptive military attack on Iraq that began onMarch 20, 2003andformally endedonMay1, 2003.Did aStargateMotivatetheUS-ledMilitary InterventioninIraq?The primary evidentiary support for the above discussion is admittedly thin forconventionalpublicpolicy expertsandmaysoundbetter suitedto afictionalthrillerthanserious public debate. From a conventional perspective, a scattered assort- ment ofindependentarcheologicalauthors,radicalexegeticalinterpretationsofbiblical texts,thewritings of“channels”ofETknowledge,speculativepapersfrom astronomers—hardlycon-stituteapersuasivesourceof informationfor understanding themotivationsof USforeignpolicy.

Arguably,more difficult to dismiss are the accounts of former participants ofclandestineorganizationswho claim tohavebeeninvolvedinStargaterelatedprojectsinthe US. Here too, however, critics may dismiss these testimonies as the work ofpsychologically disturbed individualswithanaxe to grind against various governmentagencies, or partof a psychologi-cal operation (psyop) disinformationcampaign bymilitaryintel-ligenceservices.

Indeed,accordingtoAlexandraBruce,thetestimoniesstemmingfrom theMontaukProject are part of a “psyop disinformation” campaign based in the Office of NavalIntelligence to hide the truth about actual events that did occur during the Philadelphiaexperiments.452

230

Theprevailingexplanations ofaBushadministrationas

eitherdevoted to eradicatingWeaponsof MassDestruction,and/orbeingdriven by oilinterestsandimperialambitionswillpredictablyprevailforthoseunconvincedbytheabovesources, or who believe the sources are part of a “psyop operation” by USintelligenceservices.

However,somesignificantarchaeologicaleventsdidtakeplacebothbeforeand soonafter theMarch 20 military intervention in Iraq that lend plausibility to the thesis ofStargate based technology and/or information as the true motivation of the Bushadministrationor atleastkey interestgroupsbehindit.

Thefirst archaeological eventstemsfromthe behavior ofUS led military forcesonceinIraq, especiallyafter thetakeoverof thecapital,Baghdad.Inwhat was seenas amajor error, the US forces did nothing to prevent the sacking and looting of manyimportant Iraqi installations and departments. One of these was the Iraqi NationalMuseumwherean estimated 80%of Iraq’sancient artifacts fromSumeria,BabylonandAkkadiawere“stolen”from theMuseum.

Accordingtoonesource:

Themuseumwasthe greatest singlestorehouseofmaterialsfrom thecivilizationsof ancient Mesopotamia, including Sumeria, Akkadia, Babylonia, Assyria andChaldea. Italsoheldartifacts fromPersia, AncientGreece,theRoman Empireandvarious Arab dynasties.

The museum held the tablets with Hammurabi’s Code, perhaps the world’s firstsystemof laws, andcuneiformtextsthataretheoldestknownexamplesof writing—epic poems,mathematical treatises, historical accounts.An entire library of claytabletshadnotyet beendeci-pheredorresearched,inpart becauseoftheUS-backedsanctionsthatrestrictedtravel toIraq.453

Whatissignificanthereisthereferencetothestolencuneiformtextsthatyet awaited

translation. It is quite possible that US based clandestine organizations were seekinginforma-tionthatmayhaveeitherassistedtheminfindingStargate

231

technologyinIraq or learninghow touseStargatetechnology.Reportsfrom Iraqi eyewitnesses,suggested that the “looting”appeared organized andthatknowledgeableoutsideforceswereclearly incharge.

ProfessorMcGuireGibson,oneoftheworld’s leadingarchaeologists claimed:“Itlooks as ifpartof thelootingwas adeliberateplannedaction. . .They wereabletotakekeys for vaults and were able to take out important Mesopotamianmaterials put insafes.I havea suspicionit was organizedout-sidethecountry, in fact I’mprettysure itwas . . .454

Again, itneeds to be emphasized that manySumeriancuneiform textswere stillawaitingtranslationandaninsuffi-cient numberofSumeriantranslatorsareavailableforthe more than 500,000 cuneiform texts thus far discovered. One or more of theseuntranslated textsmay have contained information thatwas the key to unlocking thesecrets behindthe useofStargatetechnology.

If McGuire is correct, it is possible that a clandestine organization involved inStargate technology,didinfactleadthelootingof theIraq nationalmuseum.

The second archeologically significant eventwas the radarmapping and start ofexcavations of the first capitalof Sumer,Uruk, by aGerman archeological team in2002.GiventheprominenceofUrukanditslikelihoodas thesite for a SumerianStargateor information on Stargate technology, then the radar mapping and resumption ofexcavationsraisedquestionsoverwhythey wereresumedatthat time and what was beingsought.

Giventhatpoliticaltensionsin Iraqhadnotsignificantlydiminishedin2002,andwiththe likelihood of it being a site of renewed military conflict with the US, it can besuggestedthattherewerepowerfulhiddenmotivationsforwhat on thesurfaceappearedtobea purelyscientificdigof an ancientSumeriancapital.With UScontrolof theskiesandSaddam’scontrolof the ground, theGermanarchaeological expedition apparently hadthepermissionofboththeSaddamregimeand USmilitaryauthoritiestodoitssurvey.

Thethird significantarchaeologicaleventwasthediscov-ery,announcedonApril29,2003,ofthetombofKingGilgameshintheancientSumeriancapitalofUruk,by thesame

232

German archaeological tomb that hadbeguna sophisticatedradarimagingsurvey ofUrukin2002.455

Gilgameshwas famedfor his epicjourneytodiscoverthe“secrets of immortality”and for meeting a survivor of the “Great Flood” who passed on the secrets ofimmortality.456 Itwouldbe fairto construesuchsecretsofimmortality asametaphor forStargatetechnologywhere onecouldmovebetweendifferentdimensions—literallyfrom therealm ofEarthandmortality,totherealmof thegodsandimmortality.

AsakingwhowaspossiblyspawnedbyanAnunnaki-humanunion, Gilgameshmaywellhave beenawareofStargatetechnologyandits time-space/interdimensionaltravelapplica- tions.Arguably, theEpic of Gilgameshwas a symbolic story for how humanscouldactivateanduseStargatetechnology.

Thenews ofthediscoveryofGilgamesh’stombrevealedthatinthemidst oftheUS-ledpreemptivewar,wheremilitary conflictwas continuing, theGermanarchaeological teamhad continued its radar imaging and excavations of Uruk. Presumably, thearchaeologists hadpowerfulprotection from both the Saddam regime andUS militaryauthorities,andwerenow simply pass-ing on any acquired information through theUSmilitaryauthor-ities now incharge.

The locationand contentsofGilgamesh’stombwould mostcertainlyhavebeenpassedon, containing if it did, any secrets concerning “immortality” and possible “Stargatetechnology.”Conclusion:Implicationsof theUS-LedPreemptiveWar inIraqWhenalltheprimaryevidenceandrecentarchaeologicaleventsareputtogether,whatemerges is a plausible case of a very different motivation for the US led militaryintervention. Interpretations of themotivationsof theBush administration in launchingpreemptivewaronIraqintermsofthe concernsraisedinBush’s2003Stateof theUnionaddress,or thecorpo-rateandimperialinterestssuggested byhiscriticssuchasRobertFisk andMichaelLind, canall be described as partof thesurface layer ofmotivationsdriving theBushadministration.

233

Ata deeperlevel, itislikelythattherewas greatanxietyby

clandestine government organizations in termsof whatwouldhappen if Hussein,withthe support of the German and other European governments, gained access to theSumerian Stargate or other ET technology buried in Uruk, or if the Stargate were tosomehow reactivate without clandestine government personnel present to monitor andcontroltheStargate.

Informationconcerningeitherthe operationofStargatesor the possible return toEarth of the Anunnaki,would have been of great interest to the US, Russia, Europeanstatesandto Saddam’sregime.PresidentBush’sStateof theUnionaddressoutliningtheneed for a preemptiveattackonIraq inmostlikelihoodmaskeda hiddenagendatogainaccesstotheStargateand/orotherETtechnologyorinformationinUrukandelsewhere inIraq.Suchaccesswouldpresumablyperpetuateclandestine government control overglobalresourcesandinformationata timeof increasedETactivity andinfluence.

Evidencesuggeststhat themotivationsforapreemptivewaragainstIraq hadlittle todo with weapons of mass destruction.The true motivation was to perpetuate USclandestine govern-ment control of information concerning the historic ET presence inIraq,associatedtechnologyandinformation,andthepossible return of the sameET races,theAnunnaki, thatsponsored theSumeriancivilization.

Evidencepointingtotheexistenceof Stargate technology,and the possibility that Iraqpossessedartifactsor informationon such technology,strengthensthecasethattheBushadmin- istration simply misled the US and world public over the true motivation forattackingIraq.

The USargumentovertheneedtorespondquickly tothethreatofWeaponsof MassDestruction ranghollowwhen theUS did not respond to NorthKorea’s declaration inOctober2002,ofsuccessfullyhavingasecret nuclearweaponspro-gram.457Althoughthereareclear strategicdifferencesbetweenIraqandNorthKorea meritinganuancedapproachtoeach case, the radically diverging approaches by the Bush administration to the“weapons of mass destruction” problems in both countries, certainly pointed tosomethingdeeper thatwasmotivatingtheBush administration for quickly getting intoIraq.

234

PresidentBush’sStateof theUnionaddressevenwentto

the extentof incorporatingfakedintelligencereportsof IraqpurchasingnuclearrelatedmaterialfromNigerto strengthenthecaseforurgentaction.458 Evenmoredisturbing were reports that the Office of Special Plans, a Pentagon group comprising key“Hawks”from theBush administration,deliberately“spun”intelligenceinformationinaway that justified war against Iraq when most intelligence analysts were simplyunconvincedby theavailableintelligence.

According to U.S. Rep. Ellen Tauscher, (D-Calif) a member of the House ArmedServicesCommittee,“The concernisthey[Office of SpecialPlans] were in the cherry-picking business—cherry-picking half-truths and rumors and only highlighting pieces of information that bolstered theadministration’scaseforwar . . .”459

Geopolitical events surrounding theUS led preemptive war in Iraq suggested thatthere existed a hidden struggle between competing clandestine government organizationsoverthecontrolofIraq’sstorehouseof ancientETtechnologyandinfor-mation.Furthermore,the “prophesied return of thegods” indicated that there was ahiddenset ofcelestialorET relatedeventsthatinfluencedthetimingof the interventioninto Iraq.

Itmay well be thecasethatthecountryof Iraq in termsofits physicalpositionholdssomesignificanceintermsofattain-ing strategicdominanceover theEarth.Itmay wellhavebeena similar considerationthatmotivatedtheAnunnakichoiceof the region ofMesopotamia,andSumerin particular,astheheadquartersfor its Earth operations.Inthe next chapter, I will closely examine the geo-political rivalry that has existedbetweenmajor globalpowersinattainingaccessand control to Iraq’s treasure chest ofET relatedartifacts,technologyandinformation.

Notes

384.Afulltext ofhisJanuary28,2003,StateoftheUnion Address,can befoundonlineat:http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html.

235

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/

385.RobertFisk, “Thisloomingwarisn’taboutchemicalwarheadsor

humanrights:it’s aboutoil,”TheIndependent18January,2003:http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=370328.

386.See Michael Lind,MadeInTexas: GeorgeW.Bush andtheSouthernTakeoverofAmericanPolitics (BasicBooks, 2002).

387.For an introductiontoexopolitics,seeChapterOne.388.100 of theseofficials havealreadygiventestimony,with another300willing to do so.SeeStephenGreer, ed.,Disclosure:Military andGovernmentWitnessesRevealtheGreatestSecretsinModernHistory (Crossing Point Inc.2001). See also Executive Summary of theDisclosure Project (Crozet, VA.:Disclosure Project, April 2001).Available onlineat: http://www.disclosureproject.com.

389.ZechariaSitchin,TheEarthChronicles,Books1–6 (New York:AvonBooks).

390.Sitchin, The 12th Planet:Book 1oftheEarth Chronicles(AvonBooks,1976),p. viii.391.SamuelNoahKramer& HiroshiTanaka,HistoryBeginsat Sumer:Thirty-Nine “Firsts” inRecordedHistory, 3rded.(UniversityofPennsylvaniaPress, 1989).

392.Seehis chapter,“TheSuddenCivilization,”The 12thPlanet,pages12–51.

393.Forthe historyof astronomicalsearchesfor PlanetX, seeWilliamGravesHoyt:PlanetXandPluto(TheUniversityofArizonaPress1980), MarkLittman:Planets Beyond—discovering the outer solar system, (John Wiley1988); and Tom vanFlandern,DarkMatter,MissingPlanets&NewComets. Paradoxesresolved, originsillumi-nated(North AtlanticBooks 1993).394.HughMcCann, “10th Planet: Pluto’sOrbit Says Yes,”DetroitNews (January 16, 1981) 1. Also cited in JimMarrs, RulebySecrecy(HarperCollins, 2000),380.395.For an announcementof the1983 announcementconcerningamys-terioustenthplanet,seeThomasO’Toole,“MysteryHeavenlyBodyDiscovered:PossiblyasLargeasJupiter,”WashingtonPost(December31,1983).396.AlanF.Alford, Godsof theNew Millennium: Scientific Proof of FleshandBloodGods(EriduBooks, 1996)124.

397.Sitchin, The 12th Planet,52.398.LloydPye,Everything YouKnowIsWrong (Madeira Beach, Fl:Adamu

Press, 1997)231–32. AlsocitedinMarrs, Ruleby Secrecy,382.399.ForinformationonmonatomicgoldandDavidHudson,go to:

http://monatomic.earth.com.400.Sitchin discussesthis planetingreatdetailinThe 12th Planet.

401. The idea that the Earth periodically experiences massive changes is discussed in books such as CharlesHapgood,The Pathof thePole

236

http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp


http://monatomic.earth.com

(Adventures UnlimitedPress,1999); ImmanuelVelikovsky,EarthinUpheaval(Doubleday,1955).

402.Erichvon Daniken,Chariotsof theGods(G.P.Putnam’sSons, 1969).403.WilliamBramley,Gods of Eden (Avon, 1989); R.A. Boulay, Flying Serpents andDragons: The Story ofMankind’sReptilianPast(BookTree,1999).

404.WilliamHenry, OneFootinAtlantis (EarthpulsePress,1998);Alford,Godsof theNew Millennium.405. For a detailed critique of Sitchin, see Michael Heiser, “Zecharia Sitchin’s Errors: An Overview”: http://www.facadenovel.com/sitchinerrors.htm.406.RonaldBrown, TheBookof Enoch(GuadalupeBaptistTheologicalSeminary Press, 2000).Anonline versionoftheBook ofEnoch can befoundat: http://wesley.nnu.edu/noncanon/ot/pseudo/enoch.htm.

407.Sitchin describestheSumerianversion ofthis eventin“Mutiny oftheAnunnaki,”The 12th Planet,312–335.

408.BookofEnoch,onlineversionfoundat:http://wesley.nnu.edu/noncanon/ot/pseudo/enoch.htm.

409.HolyBible:New InternationalVersion(HodderandStoughton,1978)Genesis,Book 6,verse 4.410.SeeBramley,Godsof Eden;Boulay,Flying Serpents andDragons (BookTree, 1999); and David Icke, TheBiggestSecret,2ndEd.(Bridge ofLovePublications,1999).

411.StewartSwerdlow,BlueBlood,TrueBlood:Conflict&Creation(ExpansionsPublishingCo., 2002).412.For aninterviewwith Al Bielak, see “TheMontaukProjectandthePhiladelphiaExperiment,”availableonlineat: http://psychicspy.com/montauk1.html.413.SeeValValerian,MatrixII:TheAbduction andManipulation ofHumansUsingAdvancedTechnology(Leading Edge Researc hGroup, 1989/90). Online information available at: http://www.trufax.org/catalog/m2.html.414.SeeBarbaraMarciniak,Bringers of the Dawn: Teachings from the Pleiadians (Bear &Co., 1992); and Earth:PleiadianKeystotheLivingLibrary(Bear&Co., 1994).

415.JelailaStarr, WeAre theNibiruans:Returnof the12thPlanet(NewLeafDistributingCo., 1999).Website:www.nibiruancouncil.com.416.Extractfrom JelailaStarr, We Are theNibiruans:Returnof the 12th Planet (NewLeafDistributing Co Inc,1999).Availableonlineathttp://www.nibiruancouncil.com/html/bookoneexcerpt2.html.

417.SheldanNidle,FirstContact(BlueLodgePress,2000).Website:www.paoweb.com.

418.Henryoutlineshisthesisinhisarticle,“SaddamHussein,TheStairway toHeavenand theReturn ofPlanetX,”which isavailableon

237

http://www.facadenovel.com/

http://wesley.nnu.edu/noncanon/ot/pseudo/enoch.htm

http://wesley.nnu.edu/


http://www.nibiruancouncil.com

http://www.nibiruancouncil.com/html/bookoneexcerpt2.html

http://www.paoweb.com

his websitewww.williamhenry.net.This is basedonhis bookArkoftheChristos:The Mythology, Symbolism and Prophecy of theReturn of PlanetX and theAge of Terror, both ofwhichareavailablefrom hiswebsite:www.williamhenry.net.

419.Sitchin,WhenTimeBegan:BookVof the EarthChronicles(Avon,1993)113–14.420. In contrast, Henry believes the Stargate was buried in some secret location by the Babylonian king,Nebuchadnezzar,after havingbeenre-takenfrom Jerusalem.SaddamHussein,The Stairway toHeavenandtheReturnofPlanetX,isavailableonhiswebsite:www.williamhenry.net.421.For a technicaldescriptionof timetravel/Stargate technology,seeJack Sarfatti, “ZeroPoint Energy GravityPhysics: Of UFOs, Stargates, time travel and parallel brane worlds,” available online at:http://stardrive.org/Jack/scvacuum.pdf.422.Richard Boylan,“TheU.S. Government,DimensionalPortals,andDr.WenHoLee—TheRestoftheStory,”availableonlineat:http://drboylan.com/wenhlee2.html.423.Richard Boylan,“TheU.S. Government,DimensionalPortals,andDr.WenHoLee—TheRestoftheStory,”availableonlineat:http://drboylan.com/wenhlee2.html.424. “Interview with Al Bielek,” Connecting Link (Issue 19, Oct 1993); available online at:http://psychicspy.com/montauk1.html.425.Excerptfrom PrestonNichols&PeterMoon,Pyramidsof Montauk:Explorationsin Consciousness(SkyBooks1995).Available onlineat:http://psychicspy.com/montauk1.html. SeealsoPreston Nichols&PeterMoon, TheMontaukProject:ExperimentsinTime (SkyBooks,1992).For review of theMontaukProject,seeJohnQuinn,“PhoenixUndead:The MontaukProjectandCampHeroToday”(NewsHawkInc,1998).Availableonlineat:http://vs03.tvsecure.com/~vs030f1/monew.htm.

426.“NerudaInterviews:Interview1”:http://wingmakers.com/neruda1.html.427.FortwoebooksdetailingMichaelRelfe’smemoriesofhisservice,seeThe Mars Records, published online at: http://www.themarsrecords.com. ForaninterviewofAndyPero,see “ProjectSuperman,”available at: http://www.hostileinvader.com/ProjectSuperman.html.For aninterviewwith Jared,see Eve Lorgen“Secret Project Super Warrior Gone Rogue,” Alienlovebite(August, 2001).Availableonlineat:http://www.alienlovebite.com/secret_project_super_warrior_gon.htm.428.SeeEveLorgen,“SecretProject SuperWarriorGoneRogue”Alienlovebite (August, 2001).Availableonlineat:http://www.alienlovebite.com/secret_project_super_warrior_gon.htm.

238

http://www.williamhenry.net



http://stardrive.org/Jack/scvacuum.pdf

http://drboylan.com/wenhlee2.html

http://drboylan.com/wenhlee2.html

http://psychicspy.com/montauk1.html

http://psychicspy.com/montauk1.html

http://vs03.tvsecure.com/~vs030f1/

http://wingmakers.com/

http://www.hostileinvader.com/

http://www.alienlovebite.com/

429.Sitchin describesthetransportationof theNefilim/Anunnakin,inhis

chapter,“The Nefilim:PeopleoftheFieryRockets,”The 12th Planet,128–72.SeealsoChildress’chapteron“AncientFlightandAerialWarfare,”ExtraterrestrialArcheology,147–210.

430.Sitchin, The 12th Planet,327.431.Sitchin, The 12th Planet,327.432.Sitchin, The 12th Planet,327.

433. For description of the resumption of archeological digs in Iraq, see Charles Recknagel, “Iraq:Archaeological Expedition MappingAncient City Of Uruk,” Radio Free Europe, May 3. http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/2002/05/03052002101632.asp.

434.Sitchindescribesthese eventsinthethird volumeofhisEarthChroniclesseries,TheWars ofGodsandMen (Avon,1999).435. For reference to this regional disaster, see an article by the Chief Archeologist from the University ofChicago,Prof McGuireGibson,“Nippur—SacredCity of EnlilSupreme Godof SumerandAkkad.”Firstpublishedin Al-Rafidan, Vol. XIV (1993) and made available online athttp://asmar.uchicago.edu/OI/PROJ/NIP/PUB93/NSC/NSC.html.436.Suchaviewisdescribedbyanumberof“channels” includingSheldanNidle, First Contact;andJelailaStar,WearetheNiburuans.Theirrespectivewebsitesare:www.paoweb.netandwww.niburuancouncil.net.437. Lynn Picknett& Clive Prince, The Stargate Conspiracy: The Truth About Extraterrestrial Life and theMysteriesofAncientEgypt(BerkleyBooks, 1999).438.Such a scenarioisalso describedby Marshall. VianSummers,AlliesofHumanity: AnUrgentMessageAbouttheExtraterrestrialPresencein theWorld Today(The Societyfor theGreaterCommunityWay ofKnowledge,2001).

439.OnepopularbookisMarkHazlewood,Blindsided:PlanetXPassesin2003 (Firstpublish LLC, 2001). Hazlewood maintains a website with online excerpts outlining clandestinegovernmentsuppressionofthecomingofPlanetX:http://www.planetx2003.com/index.html.

440.Forthe historyof astronomicalsearchesfor PlanetX, seeWilliamGravesHoyt:PlanetXandPluto(TheUniversityofArizonaPress1980); MarkLittman:Planets Beyond—discovering the outer solar system (John Wiley 1988); and Tom vanFlandern,DarkMatter,MissingPlanets&NewComets. Paradoxesresolved, originsillumi-nated(North AtlanticBooks 1993).

441.ThomasO’Toole,“MysteryHeavenlyBodyDiscovered:PossiblyasLargeas Jupiter,”WashingtonPost (December31,1983).

442.For referencetothis campaignofintimidation,seeMarkHazlewood,Blindsided.See also: http://www.planetx2003.com/index.html.

239

http://asmar.uchicago.edu/OI/PROJ/NIP/PUB93/NSC/

http://www.paoweb.net

http://www.planetx2003.com/index.html


443.SeeHazlewood,Blindsided:PlanetXPassesin2003.Website:

http://www.planetx2003.com/index.html.444.Jenkinsis authorof Maya Cosmogenesis2012 (SantaFe: BearandCo.,1998);andGalacticAlignment: The Transformation o fConsciousness According to Mayan, Egyptian, andVedic Traditions (Inner TraditionsInternational,2002).445.Twoofthefirsttoidentifythisupcoming transition were JoseArguelles and BrianSwimme, The MayanFactor:PathBeyondTechnology(Bear andCo., 1987).446.SeeLee Carroll andJanTober,The IndigoChildren:The NewKidsHaveArrived(Hay House, 1999);andDrunvaloMelchizidek,TheAncientSecretof theFlower of Life(LightTechnologyPublications,2000)Vol.2,443–54.

447.Henry discussestheseprojectsinArkof theChristos.448.Quoted in SteveRussell, “‘PeopleWill Loot,’ SaidRumsfeld,After

ProsSnatchedPricelessSumerianArtifacts,”YOWUSA.COM (June14,2003).Availableonlineat:http://www.yowusa.com/Archive/Jun2003/14jun03a/14jun03a.htm.449.Henryoutlines thisinhisarticle,“Saddam Hussein, TheStairway to Heaven and the Return of PlanetX,”whichis availableonhiswebsite:www.williamhenry.net.450.For morediscussionof this historyof non-disclosure in theUSgov-ernment,seeChapterTwo.

451.SeeBill Berkowitz,“FreedomofInformationActontheropes:Working foraChange,”FreedomofInformationCenter,(October11,2002).Availableonlineat:http://foi.missouri.edu/federalfoia/foiactonropes.html.452.Alexandra Bruce, “The Montauk PsyOp,” New World Disorder Magazine, available online at:http://www.newworlddisorder.ca/ issuetwo/articles/bruce.html. See also her forthcoming book, The MontaukPsyOp:TimeTravel,MindControl&Disinformation.Formoreinfo visither websiteat: http://www.chica.bruce.net.453. See Patrick Martin, “The sacking of Iraq’s museums: US wages war against culture and history,” WorldSocialist Website, 16 April 2003. Available online at: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/ muse-a16.shtml.

454.Quoted in SteveRussell, “‘PeopleWill Loot,”SaidRumsfeld,AfterProsSnatchedPricelessSumerianArtifacts,”YOWUSA.COM (June14,2003).Availableonlineat:http://www.yowusa.com/Archive/Jun2003/14jun03a/14jun03a.htm.

455.“LostTombof King GilgameshDiscovered,” BBC News,April 29,2003. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2982891.stm.

456.Foranonlineaccountofthe EpicofGilgamesh,go to:http://www.crystalinks.com/sumermythology.html.

240


http://www.yowusa.com/Archive/


http://foi.missouri.edu/federalfoia/

http://www.newworlddisorder.ca/

http://www.chica.bruce.net

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/

http://www.yowusa.com/Archive/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2982891.stm

http://www.crystalinks.com/sumermythology.html

457.AndreaKoppelandJohnKing,“U.S.:NorthKoreaadmitsnuke pro-

gram,”CNN(October16, 2002) Goto:http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/10/16/us.nkorea.458.AndrewGriceandDavidUsborne, “TheNigerConnection: TonyBlair, Forged Documentsandthe CaseForWar,” the Independent June 5, 2003. Copy available at: http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/attack/2003/0605niger.htm.459.EricBoehlert,“Rumsfeld’spersonalspy ring,”InformationClearingHouse (July16,2003) Available online at: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4124.htm.

241

http://www.cnn.com/2002/

http://www.globalpolicy.org/

Chapter6

America’sTriumph&Europe’sAngst—TheSecretRacetoControlIraq’sExtraterrestrialHeritage

Afterahastilyorganized summit meeting in theAzores onMarch 16, 2003with hisEuropean allies, President GeorgeBush decided to abandon diplomatic efforts for afurtherUNSecurity Council ResolutioncondemningIraq’s lack of progressin fulfillingexisting Security Council resolutions concerning any weapons of mass destructionpossessedby Iraq.

Ina televisedaddresstotheNationon March 17, PresidentBush gaveIraqi PresidentSaddam Hussein 48 hours to leave Iraq together with his sons to prevent a US ledinvasion. On March 19, soon after the deadline had expired, President Bush orderedsurgicalair strikesonBaghdadandthe“secondgulfwar” hadformally begun.

In the immediate post-Azores environment of fingerpoint- ing over responsibilityfor thefailed diplomaticefforts tomaintain globalconsensus over how torespond toIraq, Europeandtheworldwatched anxiouslyfor the consequences of the US,BritishandAustralianarmedincursion.A prominentcriticofPresident Bushwas the MinorityLeaderofthe USSenate,SenatorTomDaschle,who said inastingingrebukethat he was“saddenedthat this president failed so miserablyatdiplomacy thatwe’re now forcedtowar.”460

Despitedirepredictionsofalongandbloodymilitarycampaign,resistancebytheIraqimilitary quicklyevaporatedwhen theUS led forces reachedBaghdad. In a highlysymbolicspeechaboard theUSaircraftcarrierAbrahamLincolnonMay 2, PresidentGeorgeBush declared that large-scalemilitary hostilities in Iraq were over. Contrary towidespreadpredictions

242

of regional upheaval, the US hadapparentlysucceededin itspreemptive military intervention against the former regime of Saddam Hussein.Although aguerrilla warbyremnants ofSaddam’s regime continues at the time ofwritingthisbook,largescalemilitaryhostilitiesappeartobetrulyover.

Itisnecessaryto analyzethe implicationsofthe faileddiplomaticeffortstodealwithIraq andthesubsequent US-ledmilitary incursion froman“exopolitical perspective.” Thisisespeciallyimportantsince,as ChapterFive argued,Iraq holdsspecialsignificanceas a nationthatoncehostedan advancedrace of extraterrestrials whose legacyhas notbeendisclosedtothegeneralpublicor electedgovernmentrepresentatives.

Examiningthecomplexdiplomaticmaneuversamongmajorpowersconcerningthemeritsof military interventioninIraqgivesimportantinsightsintothe nature of thealliancesbetweenclandestineorganizationsandtheirrespectiveper-ceptionsof poweras well as thethreatrelatedtocontroloverextraterrestrial(ET)assets.

This chapterexamineshowthe need to gainunfetteredaccess toIraq’sETheritagehas playeda critical role in influencing US foreignpolicy in the PersianGulf regionever since the Carter administration. The chapter analyses how clandestineorganizations based in the US, Europe and Soviet Union/Russia have historicallymaneuvered among themselves to gain strategic advantage in having access to andexploitingETtechnol-ogy hiddeninIraq.

The chapterarguesthattheneedfor a diplomaticsolutionto the recentinternationalcrisis overIraqresulted fromthedesire of clandestine groups in Europe, RussiaandChinatorestrictaccessto these sitesbyUS organizations that havegrownrapidly inpower and displayed an imperialistic tendency that leads to much anxiety among theirEuropeancounterparts.

Thechapterfurthermore claimsthatthe planetis experi-encingthe useof“exoticweaponry”betweenclandestinegroupsstrugglingamongthemselvesover how toshareaccessand controlof ET technology in Iraq, while suppressing the true nature of theconflictto thegeneralpublicandmostelectedofficials. Thechapteralsoarguesthatpost-waragreement torebuildIraqunderthe newUNSecurityCouncilresolution

243

passed on May 22, 2003, marks a newphaseinthestrategyofclandestineorganizationstocoordinatetheireffortsinexploit-ing Iraq’sETheritage.461

Finally, thepaperclaimsthattheUS triumphin launchingamilitarytakeoverin Iraqgenerates angst among European clandestine groups concerned over the increasedpowerandimperialpretensionsof their UScounterparts.Iraq’sExtraterrestrialHeritageandtheClandestinePolitical AgendaIn1976,ZechariaSitchin publishedthefirst of his books,The12thPlanet,whichwasbased onhistranslationsofancientSumeriancuneiformtexts.462Asmentioned in Chapter Five, Sitchin described the technological wonders andknowledgeofthe ancientcivilizationofSumeria,andclaimedthattheSumerianswereaidedbyanadvancedraceof beingscalledtheAnunnaki(Sumerianfor ‘thosewhocamefromHeaventoEarth’). Sitchin’s literal interpretation of the Anunnakias an ETracedistinguished his work from earlier translators who viewed the Anunnaki asmythological“gods.”

Akey componentof Sitchin’swork relevant to this chapter is his ideaof factionalwar betweenthe AnunnakithatfinallycontributedtotheirdepartingEartharound1700BC.463Anothercomponent is hisviewthat the home worldof theAnunnaki is amysterious“10th planet” of the solar system (Nibiru—planet of the crossing) that periodicallyreturnstotheEarth’svicinityevery 3,600years.

As mentioned in Chapter Five, Sitchin’s innovative translations when combinedwith biblical and historical records supporting the existence of ET races in humanaffairs, madeclearthe importantroleplayedbytheAnunnakiin the genesisofhumanity.Sitchin’swork becamevery influentialandwas incor-porated and/orsupportedby thework of other independent archaeologists, historians, “channels” and even a few ex-militarywhistleblowers.464

Nevertheless, Sitchin’s translations proved to be very controversial andmainstreamarcheologists/historiansdismissed

244

hisworkastoo speculativeinitsdefinitions,premisesandconclusions.465However,therewereveryinfluential clandestineorganizationsthattookSitchin’sworkmuchmoreseriously.

As mentioned in Chapter Two, from at least 1941, US based clandestineorganizationshavebeen engaged in the reverseengineering of downedETspacecraft,and communicatingwithdifferent ET races.466 Themostprominentof these organiza-tions was associated with a policy coordinating group comprising senior officialsfrom theRoosevelt/Trumanadministrations.

PresidentTrumangaveexecutiveapprovalfor thecreationof this elitepolicymakingbody in 1947 in a classifiedmemowherein hewrote: “Hereafter this matter shall bereferred to only asOperation Majestic Twelve.”467 Majestic Twelvewas claimed toinitially consist of 12 members drawn primarily from the defense and intelligencecommunityandwasexpandedundertheEisenhoweradministration.

Overtime,clandestineorganizationsgrewrapidlydue tothecomplexityand size oftheETpresence,and they remaineda publicsecret with theirexistenceandcompositionrevealedneithertothegeneralpublicnortomostelectedpublicofficials.468

The most prominent of the reverse engineering efforts of clandestine organizationshaveinvolvedaraceofETs com-monlydescribedas“Grays”fromZetaReticulum, similar in appearance to the ETs depicted in Steven Spielberg’s famousmovie,CloseEncountersofthe ThirdKind.Thetechnologypossessedby theGrayswasfar advancedoveranythingpos-sessedbyhumanity,andeffortsbegan immediately tolearnaboutandreverseengineerthis technology.469

AsrevealedbyCol. Corsoinhisgroundbreakingbook,TheDayAfter Roswell, theGrays possessedpropulsionand naviga-tion systemsfaradvancedover any possessedby theUSor theUSSR.470Theprevalenceofthe Grays’shipsin the shootingdownof ETcraftsuggested thattheUS andtheUSSRwerefamiliar enoughwith Gray technologyinorder to begin target- ing their craft and creating a planetary defense shield.Certainly, this is what Col. Corso suggested in his work and has been independently confirmedbyanumberof otherpromi-nentmilitary/intelligencewhistleblowers.471

245

The contentofSitchin’sworkdescribingan ancientETrace

wouldmostcertainlyhavearoused the curiosity of clandestineorganizations in the USand elsewhere, intent on developing the most advanced technology possible fromvisiting/resident ET races. The possibility that the Anunnaki described by Sitchin hadattaineda level of technologicalsophisticationevenmoreadvancedthanthatattainedbyGrays was somethingthathadtobeseriouslyexplored.

CertainlythegiantphysicalbodiespossessedbythisancientraceofETs—theAnunnaki—suggested theyhadreachedan evolutionary level in biological terms thatwas moreevolved than theGrays who appeared to be sufferinggeneticproblems. Thiswould havehadan impacton thetechnologicaladvancesthatcouldbeachievedbetweenthesetwo dissimilarraces,especiallywhenitcametothedevelopmentandapplicationofexotictechnologythatfocusedontime/inter-dimensionaltravel.

Testimoniesprovidedbyparticipantsin the Philadelphia/MontaukProjectssuggestthatimportantgeneticfactorsinflu-encedthesuccessfuluse of such technologies. Thegeneticallyweak “Grays”wouldthereforenothavebeenabletodevelopawhole class ofexotic technology that would have beenacces- sible by the more genetically resilientAnunnaki.

Ifthetechnological accomplishments of theAnunnakimatched theirbiologicalevolution,thenthe Anunnakiwouldhavetechnology far surpassing anything currentlypossessedby any of theclandestineorganizationsaroundtheplanetcre-atedtostudyandreverseengineerETtechnologygainedfromGrays. It wouldalso havebeen likely thattheETsthatassistedNaziGermanyindevelopingitsadvancedtechnology,and“escape”to hidden bases inAntarctica and South Americawere associated with remnants ofAnunnaki hiddenon Earth.472

The eugenicallyoriented racial theories thatmotivated theNaziswouldhave beencompatiblewiththeircollaboratingwith a raceof “racially pure” beings,theAnunnaki,whopro-videdan evolutionarymodelfor thebiologicaldevelopment ofhumanity. Thetechnologicaladvancesgainedthroughoccultcommunicationssponsoredby theThuleSocietywitha raciallypure humanoidracehiddenin secret undergroundlocations

246

around the planet suggested that the Naziswerecollaboratingwith such an advancedrace.

TheNazisbelievedthe “Aryans”were descendantsofaraceofNordicblondehairedblue-eyed supermen who had ruled the planet from Thule, ancient capital of thisNorthernsuper-race. It can be concluded that the “supermen” theNazis believedwereassistingthemandformedthebiologicalmodelfor humanity’sevolution,were noneotherthantheAnunnakithatSitchin hadoutlinedinhiswork.

Even more perplexing for clandestine organizations awareof Sitchin’s work wastheideathattheAnunnaki couldonedayreturnen masse to theEarth andagain interactwith humanityas theydid in the remotepast.The idea that the Anunnaki’s home worldperiodically returned to the solarsystemwouldmost surelyhaveattracted attention intermsof anypossibletimeline andwhatthis meantfor humanity.Alternatively, the ideathatthe Anunnakicouldarrivethroughanexotictrans-portationdevicehidden in Iraqsuchasa“Stargate”(seeChapterFive)wouldhavebeenanothercauseforconcern.

One wayofconfirming Sitchin’s hypotheses wouldhavebeen to use advanced communication protocols developed by organizations such as the National SecurityAgency(NSA)incommunicatingwithdifferentETraces.DanShermandescribedhisinvolvementin ProjectPreserveDestinyin the1960s when theNSA began to use psychics for telepathic com-municationswith ETraces confirming that Western based clandestine organizations were adoptingcommunicationmethodssimilar tothoseusedby theNazis inthe1930s.473

It is likelythatProjectPreserveDestinyandsimilar projects in othercountrieswouldhave been successful in communicating with the Anunnaki.474 Another means ofconfirmingSitchin’sthesiswouldhavebeen through“remote viewingprograms”thathadbeensecretlysponsoredintheearly 1970sby anum-ber ofUSgovernmentand militaryintelligenceagencies.475Itislikely thattheseandotherintelligencegatheringeffortscon-firmedthevalidity ofsomeifnot mostofSitchin’shypotheses.

The confirmation of Sitchin’s theses would have hadtremendous foreignpolicy implications. USand Europeanclandestine organizations wouldundoubtedly havemadeit a

247

toppriority togain access to theseancientETsites insouthernIraq tolearnas muchas possibleabouttheadvancedtechnol-ogy usedby theAnunnaki,informationabouttheir societyandtheir intentionsconcerninghumanity.

Access to these sites would also provide important information about thoseAnunnaki stillresidenton Earth andtheextentoftheir collaborationwithNazi forces thatpossiblystilloperatedintheAntarcticandSouthAmerica.Furthermore,USandEuropeanclandestine organizations would have been interested in learning more about thepurportedhomeworldoftheAnunnakiincaseitdidindeedreturntothevicinityof thesolar system in the near future. Finally, the US andWestern Europewould have beenintent on ensuring that such technology did not fall into thehands of their ideologicalrivals,theSoviet Union.

The problemfor theUSand WesternEurope,however,was thatat the time Sitchin’sfirstbookappeared,theCold WarstillexistedandIraqwasfirmlyin the Sovietsphere ofinfluence.Althoughtherewas strategiccooperationbetweentheUSandUSSRin dealingwith the ET presence ever since the end of the Second World War, the 1945 YaltaAgreement wasbased ontheprinciplethatETartifactsin variousregionsof Earth wouldcomeunderthe sphereof influenceof themajorpowerthatcontrolledor hadan alliancewith thehostnation.476

After a left wing coup in 1958 that deposed the Western- leaning King, Iraqnationalizeditsoilindustriesandmovedfirmly in theSovietcamp.In 1968,the radicalsocialistBa’athParty cametopowerandincreasedtieswith theSovietUniondevelopingasocialist system thatwas secular and dependent on Warsaw Pact countries. The SovietUnion (nowRussia)wouldundoubtedlyhaveknownaboutSitchin’sworkandwouldalreadyhavebeen workingto confirmif Sitchin’shypotheseswere true through its ownsecretpsychic,remoteviewingandotherexoticcommunicationprojectsthatitusedforintelli-gencegatheringon ETraces.

TheSovietUnionhadapowerful politicaladvantage ingainingaccess to theseETsites ifandwhen theywere found,and exploitingwhatever technology and informationlaywithin.

WiththeunlikelihoodthatIraqwouldcooperatewithUS/Europeanclandestineorganizationsingainingaccessto

248

these ancient ET sites, these organizationswereconfrontedwithadisturbingpolicydilemma.Iftheinternationalstatusquoremained, thenat somepointthe SovietUnionwouldlocatetheseETsitesandreverseengineerwhatevertechnologyexisted; thereby eradicating any technological advantages theWest might hold andperhapsgainan advantagein thecuttingedgetechnologiesoftime/interdimensionaltravel.Furthermore,ifthehomeworld ofAnunnaki did return, then theSoviet Unionwould bebestplacedtorespond towhatevercontingencies thiscreated, anddictatehow the planet’sgovernmentswouldhavetocoordinatetheir activities.

Given theabovescenario,itishighly inconceivablethatUSandEuropean clandestineorganizations wouldn’t havedevel-opeda top secretsetof foreign policy goalswhoseaimwas tobringaboutUS/European accessto Iraq’sburiedETtechnol-ogy.Thiswouldhavetobeachievedwithoutprovokinga ColdWar confrontation with theSoviet Unionwho would have been aware of the West’s goals and resolutely opposed to US/Europeanaccess.

Allthis wouldhavetobe achievedwithoutarmedconflictbetweenthemajor powersand withoutpublic disclosureoftheexistenceofIraq’sextensiveET heritageandvirtualtreasurehouseofETartifactsandinformation.The SecretAgendatoGain AccesstoIraq’sETTechnologySinceat leastthe end of the Second WorldWar,USandEuropean basedclandestine organizationshavecoordinatedamongthemselvesa joint policy ingainingaccesstoandusingreverseengineeringET technologyfoundaroundthe planet.Themostprominentinternationalforumis undoubtedlytheBilderberggroupthatholdsclosedmeetings on an annual basis.477 These meetings provide the opportunity for the lead- ingindustrialists,politicians,mediamagnatesandmilitary fig-ures fromdifferent Westernnations to meet and coordinate policies that have global significance ranging fromfinancial andeconomicpolicy,to orchestratingpoliticaleventsin orderto

249

bringaboutfavorableinternationalconditionsfor theirvariousagendas.

Less well knownis thattheBilderberggrouphasplayedakey role in ensuringglobalnon-disclosureof theETpresence,andindiscrediting individuals and organizations whoareattemptingto revealthe trueextentofETinterventioninhumanaffairs.478

Organizations such as the Bilderberg group and other US/European basedclandestineorganizationsdesignforeignpolicy goalsthatare “secret” insofar as thesearenotrevealedto electedpublicofficials, andrevealed only to thoseofficialswhoareboundbysecrecyoathsnotto discloseinformationabouttheETpresenceandclandestinepoliciestogainaccesstoET technology.In this way, it hasbeenaccuratelyreportedthatclandestine organizations have long been able to orchestrate international crises tobringaboutpolitical conditionsthatfulfilltheir foreignpolicy goals.479

The success of the secret foreign policy goals of US/ European clandestine organizationsingainingaccesstoIraq’sET heritageandpreparingfor apossiblereturn of the Anunnaki, lay in promoting international conditions that would allowUS/Europetogainunfettered accessto IraqwithoutprovokingSovietinterventionandafullscalemilitarycon-frontationduringtheColdWar.

The way in which this couldbedonewouldbe to initiateaseriesof regional crisesthatwould temptIraq’sstaunchlysecu-lar socialistregimeto takemilitary advantageofthese crises. The ultimate result would be Iraq’s increasing dependence on Westernnations;veeringawayfromits allianceanddepend-enceon theSoviet Union, distractedby itsown regionalcrises.

Thesolutionto the US/Europeanpolicydilemmawastosponsorupheaval in Iraq’smain rivalandregionalpowerhouse,Iran, thatwouldinevitablyforceIraq intoa militaryconfronta-tionwithitsmorepowerfulneighbor,andtherebycreateopportunitiesforgreaterUSandEuropeaninfluenceinIraq.

Traditionally,the US and its allies sponsored Islamic funda-mentalism throughout theMiddleEastregion,hopingthiswouldweakensocialismas a viablesocial politicalsystem,andtherebyprovideforthe expansionofUS/European influence

250

over territories thatmight hold extensiveETassets.This hadoccurred ever since theSuez crisis with the rise of Arab socialism and popular ArabregimessuchasthatofEgypt’sPresidentJamalAbdul Nasir. AccordingtoLalKhan:

Oneof the cornerstonesof US foreignpolicywastosponsor,organize,armandfoment modern Islamic fundamentalism as a reactionary weapon against therising tide of mass upsurge and social revolutions. The Jamaat-e-Islami and Ikhwan-ul-Muslimeen[IslamicFundamentalistOrganizations]weresingledoutforthe jobmainlydue to theirviciousnessandfanaticalneo-fascistcharacter.Afterthe Suez defeat the imperi- alists gave top priority to this policy. Large sums ofmoneyweredished out by thespecial operationsdepartment of theCIAand thePentagon. They provided assistance in devising the strategy and training of thesereligiouszealots.480

Covert sponsorship of Islamic fundamentalism had played an important role in

underminingthe socialistsystemestab-lishedbyPresidentNasir.This provedcrucialinthe eventualrejectionof socialistidealsby his successor,Anwar Sadat,andthe eventualmovement ofEgypt fromthe Soviet Sphere of Influence into the West. Thus any ETartifactsin Egyptwouldautomatically move frompotential Soviet control into theWesterncamp,inaccordwith theprinciplesestablishedattheTreaty ofYalta.

Although sponsorship of Islamic fundamentalism had been an important part ofcovertUS foreignpolicysincethe early1960s,whatmadethe caseof Iraqdifferent wasthatthe USwould sacrifice an importantregional ally in order todestabilize Iraq. The primary focus of this secret agenda forgaining access to Iraq’s ET heritage was that the Shah of Iran would be toppled andreplacedbyafundamentalistIslamicregimethatwouldcreatehavocanduncertainty inthePersianGulfregion.

The successofthis radicalplan restedina twofoldstrategyof first withdrawingthetraditional support of the US for the Shah of Iran whomaintained a tight hold onpoliticalpower

251

throughhis powerfulsecurity forces; andsecond,fomentinganIslamicrevolutioninIranbyallowing theexportof revolutionaryliteratureinto Iran. Thefirstpartofthis dual strategywasmadepossibleby theCarteradministration,which hadbegun advo-catinghumanrights as an important foreignpolicy principle for theUS indealingwith its globalallies, soonaftercomingintooffice inJanuary1977.481

Carter’shumanrights initiative placedpressureon theShahfor politicalreforms thatundermined his tight hold on political power and restrained him from using militaryforcetostayinpower.TheShah’sinabilitytopasssufficientreformstoappeasethegrowingIranianmiddleclass,ledtoarapidincreaseinpoliticaldissent.

The secondpart ofthisdual strategywas forFrancetogiveasylumin October1978toanexiledIslamic cleric,AyatollahRuhollahKhomeini,whowouldbe givenfreereintoplayadestabilizingroleby advocatinga radicalIslamic State in Iranandunderminingattemptstocreatea liberalsecularstatebymoderateIranianreformers.Franceagreed togiveasylumtoKhomeiniafterhewasexpelled fromNajaf, Iraqby the Iraqi regime thatwas under pressure from Iran to silence the outspo- ken cleric. The role of France inallowingKhomeinito enterFranceanduseit as a baseto producea seriesof fiery tapesandwrittenpamphletsdenouncingtheShah’sregimeprovedcriticalin sparkingIslamicfervorandundermining effortsbymoderate political reformers for a secular liberalgovernmentundertheShah.482

Thesuccessofthisclandestinetwo-prongedstrategyultimatelyled tothecollapseof the Shah’s regime, and he had to flee from Iran on January 16, 1979. Efforts bymoderate Iranian reformers to bring about a modern liberal state were doomed byFrance’sdecision to allow AyatollahKhomeini to return to Iran in this critical period.ThreedaysaftertheShah’sdeparture, AyatollahKhomeinitriumphantlyflew fromFranceto millions of admiring supporters in Iran to announce the formation of a newgovernment,andformallybeginthe Iranianrevolution.

TheShahofIranhadbeen sacrificedand liberal Iranianreformers betrayed so aseriesofregionalcrisesinthe

252

Persian Gulf could be orchestrated byUS/European clandes-tineorganizationsthatwouldallowthemto gainastrategicfootholdinIraq.

The impactof the Iranian revolution in regional termswas ominous for the SunnidominatedregimesthatsurroundedtheIslamic Republicdominatedby theShiitesof Iran.ShiitesandSunnisdifferoverthe legitimate successors to the ProphetMuhammed, andhavehistoricallyhaddifficultrelationshipsdue to the “martyrdom” ofkeyShiiteleaders,suchasthegrandsonsof theProphetMuhammad.

For the Sunni dominated Socialist regime of Iraq (Iraqi President Al-Bakr wasforced to resign on July 16, 1979, andwas succeeded by his powerful Vice-President,SaddamHussein)the Islamicrevolutionwasaloomingthreat to theterritorialintegrity of Iraq and even the survival of its socialist regime. Iraq was the mostdevelopedsocietyintheArabworldwithhighpercapitaindicesin health,education,andpublicservices.

Iraq’s political systemwas dominated by socialist principles thatmade it a verysecularandprogressiveadministrationinthe region.Iraq,however,hadalarge ShiitepopulationinsouthernIraq (locationof theancientSumeriancitiesin whichlayburiedwhateverfacilities/informationleftbehindbytheancientAnunnaki).Iraq AttemptsToTake MilitaryAdvantageoftheIranianRevolutionThenewIslamicRepublicofIranwasadire threat totheterritorialintegrityof Iraq sinceitwould undoubtedlyinfluencethe restiveShiite populationof Iraq who madeup60%of thepopulation and resented theSunnielites (20%) that ruledIraq.483 Furthermore,Iran’sIslamicStatewas an ideologicalrivaltotheBa’ath socialistsystemthenexisting inIraq.

SaddamHussein instinctively understood the threat posed by revolutionary Iran toIraq,anddecided to actwhile the Islamic regimewas still in its infancy and Iran waspreoccupiedbyconsolidatingits regime.More importantfor Saddam,the

253

Iranian military hadbeendecimatedby theRevolutionwith itsmostseniorandskilledpersonneleitherescapingthe newregime,orbeingpurgedby the new Iranian authorities. The mighty Iranian military which only a short timeearlierwas themost powerful in the region, suddenly was having difficulty findingenoughtrainedpilotsandsparepartsfor its advancedfleetsofUSsuppliedaircraft.

The new Iraqi regime under Saddam Hussein decided t ostrike and launched adevastatingattack inSeptember1980 on itslargerandmorepowerfulneighbor,Iran, thatresultedin a longeight-year war that quicklyground down into astalemate.Westernstatesalongwith wealthyArab statesbegan tosupportSaddam’sregime with technology, financesandsecret arma-ments.484 TheSovietUnion,preoccupiedbyitsownmilitarydifficulties in countering an Islamic revolution in Afghanistan wasnot able to providesufficient resourcestohelpIraq initswar.

The end of the longIran-Iraqwar in 1988 occurred almost simultaneously with arapidlytransformingglobalpoliticalclimate.Easternbloccountries belonging to theWarsawPactwere beginning to collapse and the mighty SovietUnionwas also in theinitial stages of its eventual disintegration into15 independent republics. With theSovietUnion/Russiarapidlylosingglobalinfluence,Westernstatesgainedgreater promi-nence in Iraq. Thiswas especially true for France andGermany, both of which playedimportant roles in directly financing and aiding Iraq in its long war with Iran.Significantly,Francehadplayeda direct role in supporting the construction of nuclearfacilities in Osirak, Iraq, which werebombed by the Israeli Air force in1981.485 Iraqcouldcount onFrance, Germany andChina to fillthe strategic vacuum created by thedisintegrationof theSovietUnion.

Yugoslav,ChineseandGermanengineeringfirmsprovidedthe technicalsupport forIraq’s construction of a sophisticatednetworkof underground tunnelsand bunkers thatwereusedbytheIraqi leadership.486ConfirmingtheYugoslavconnection,aWashingtonPost articlestated:

ManyofIraq’smilitarytunnelsarebelievedtohave beenbuiltbyAeroinzenjering,aSerbianengineeringfirm

254

once run by the military of theformerYugoslavia.Hussein maintainedaclose relationshipwithCommunistleaderTito (JosipBroz),andwith SlobodanMilosevic,whoseundergroundtunnelsandbunkersbedeviledU.S. andNATO commandersduringthe1999 Kosovoairwar.487

These elaborate tunnel constructions occurred soon after Saddam’s elevation to

powerandwouldhavebeenmotivatedbothbythethreatposedbyIranianmissileattack,andSaddam’sawarenessthatIraq’sancient(ET)heritage,muchofwhich lay buried,wasthe key to his owngrandioseplansfor regionaldominance.488 It is significant thathereliedprimarilyonYugoslavand Chinese engineers, since thiswould have given himmostpolitical flexibilityintakingadvantageofwhat-ever was found withoutrelying ontheSoviet UnionortheWest.

Itislikelythatatsomepoint in building theseundergroundconstructions throughoutIraq, evidence of Iraq’s extraterrestrial civilization was directly encountered. The complex task ofstudying andeventually reverse engineering these ET assetswouldhave begun. These initial efforts, however, would have been limited by thecontingenciesofthe Iran-Iraqwar,thehighly advancednatureof thesetechnologies,andIraq’s efforttoextractmaximumconcessionsfromSoviet/Russian,EuropeanandChineseefforts tostudy and exploit this technol-ogy. It is worth emphasizing that thecountriesthatactivelyassistedIraqin its variousconstructionandweaponsacquisi-tionsprograms were those thatwere most insistent upon a diplomatic solution to therecentcrisis:Russia,France,GermanyandChina.USForeignPolicy andtheFirst GulfWarDespiteitstacit supportforIraq in theIraq-Iran war, theUnitedStates(and Britain)had adistinct disadvantageover itsEuropeanpartners/rivalsin gainingaccessto Iraq’sancientETsites.TheIraqsocialistsystem,itshistoryofhumanrightsabuses,thebrutalpoliciesofSaddamthatincludedassassinatinghis rivals

255

and using chemical weapons on Iraq’sKurdishminorities,Iraq’sstronglinkswith theSoviet Union, and strongopposition tothestate of Israel, made itdifficult for theUStoformally improveits relationshipwith Iraq’sregime.489

The USCongress, likemost institutions comprised of elected government representatives, was simply unaware of the need for US foreign policy to have acooperativerelation-shipwith Saddam’sregimein orderto exploitthe latter’sETassets.Congresswould have revoltedatanyattempttoopenlyassistwhatappearedtobe a brutalregimerun by a despoticruler. This meantthatUSbasedclandestineorganizationshadto orchestrateinternationaleventsin away thatwouldfulfill the secretpolicy goalofgainingunfetteredaccesstoIraq’sETheritage.

Under the first President Bush, Iraq andKuwait became engaged in a diplomaticcrisis over the overproduction of oil by Kuwait in 1991. Kuwait’s overproduction meantthatworldoilpriceswere deflatedandIraq’soilproductionwouldbeinsufficientto generate the necessary revenue for Iraq to begin the difficult reconstruction processafter its costly war with Iran.This resulted inmaking Iraq moredependent on Westernstatesand clandestineorganizations—aresult that Saddamwould nothavebeenpleasedwith, given his undoubted awareness that financial independence would delivermaximumnegotiatingpowerwith whomeverheallowed to exploit the ET resourcesonhis territory.

Even more vexing to the regime of Saddam Hussein, Kuwait was demandingrepaymentof thewar loans ithad givento Iraqduring the eightyear Iraq-Iranwar.ForSaddam, this was the ultimate affront, given that Iraq had fought a war that directlybenefited Kuwait and theother Sunni dominated states in the PersianGulf. As far asSaddamwas concerned, Kuwaitshouldhaveshownmore gratitudeforthe sacrifice inIraq’sfinancialandhumanresourcesinitsdebilitatingwarwithIran.It is unlikelythatKuwait wouldhavetakensuchariskypolicyin dealingwithits powerfulneighborhaditnot been for firm assurances by its main sponsor and historical patron, Britain, thatKuwaitwouldnotbe abandoned inaconflictwith Iraq.

256

Iraq’slongstandinggrudgeagainstBritain’ssponsorshipof

Kuwait went back to 1899, when Britain took Kuwait “under its protection.”490 Theproblemwas thatKuwait was then a part of Iraq’s Basra district that was ruled by thecrumblingOttomanEmpire.WhenIraqbecameindependentin 1932,afteritselfcomingunder British control after the First World War defeat and collapse of the OttomanEmpire,Basra, Iraq’smain seaport,no longerincludedKuwait.

Iraqis felt cheatedof both theunfetteredoceanaccessandwealth that the territory ofKuwait offered.So odiouswas thisBritish policyfor Iraq’spoliticalelites,thateversinceits inde-pendence, Iraq’s leadershaverefusedto recognizethe sover-eignstatehoodof Kuwait, and continued to call for i tsreintegration into Iraq. In raising its oilproduction,callingforrepaymentof its war loans,andits dubiouspoliticallegitimacyinthe eyes of Iraq’s political elite, Kuwait was undoubtedly acting in a risky andantagonisticway.

In forcing a change in Kuwait’s antagonistic policies, Iraq decided to engage inbrinkmanshipandmasseda largearmyon its borderwith Kuwait. At this critical pointwhere Iraq wasindicatingitsintentto possibly invade Kuwait if itdidnotchange itspolicies,April Glaspie, the US Ambassador to Iraqmadewhat appearedtobe a crucialerror.

InadvisingIraq abouttheUSview concerning the simmer- ing Iraq/Kuwait dispute,she said: “Wehave no opinionon yourArab-Arabconflicts. . .such asyourdispute with Kuwait. Secretary [of State James] Baker has directed me to emphasize theinstruction. . .thatKuwaitisnotassociatedwithAmerica.”491

Given the history of Iraq’s relationship with Kuwait, the risk-taking personalpsychologyofSaddamHusseinandantag-onisticpolicy of theKuwaiti leadership,itmaywell have been predicted that Saddamwould interpret this as a green light to invade.Glaspiewas appropriately“punished”for her“crucialerror.”492

However,whatif this“tragicerror”byaseniordiplomatwasnota mistake?What ifSecretaryBaker’sinstructionwereintendedtoprovideSaddamwith thebeliefthattheUSwouldstandbywhileheinvadedKuwaitandeventuallyforceda

257

diplomatic solution that would address someofIraq’shistoricalgrievancesoverKuwait?Saddammaywellhaveinterpretedsuch a policy as ameansbywhich theUSwas ingratiating itselfwithhis regime inorder to gain access to Iraq’sstrategicresources,includinganyETartifactsthathadbeendiscovered.

Saddammaywell haveviewedthis as a quidpro quoforallowing theUStogainmoreinfluenceinIraq andhaveaccesstothehidden/discoveredETtechnology.Saddam,arisk-takerby nature,may well havebeen fooledby subtlesignalsby USpolicyofficialsandbelievedhisregimewouldbenefitfromlaunchingan attack.

President Bush was a former headof theCentralIntelligence Agency andthereforeaware andmostlikelyamemberofUSbasedclandestineorganizationssetuptocoor-dinategovernment policyon the ET presence.493 SecretaryofStateBaker, aclose friend and former chiefofstaffforPresidentBush,wouldalsohavebeen awareofthe need for US access into Iraq to monitor and/or control whatever ET technologyexisted.

Keyfiguresinthe Bushadministrationwere mostlikelyawareofany time line thatexisted in terms of a possible return of the Anunnaki home world. The conflict overKuwait was anopportunity to lull Saddam into taking the risk of invasion inorder tobringaboutthe desiredUSmilitary interventionthatwouldleadto greaterUS access toandcontroloverwhateversignificantETsitesexistedinIraq.

Thus thepoliticalcrisis thatengulfedIraq andKuwait andwhichresultedinSaddamtakingthe risky policyofmilitaryinterventioninKuwait,was orchestratedby USbasedclandes-tineorganizationsthatdesiredunfetteredaccessby theWestinto Iraq.

Althoughsuchaconspiratorialorchestrationofinterna-tionaleventsthatledto thefirst Gulf War in 1991 is undoubt-edlycontroversial, it is consistent with the way inwhich theETpresence has been systematicallysuppressed globally.Thepolicy of non-disclosure of theETpresence to themassmediaand most elected public officials ismadepossiblebytheability of clandestineorganizationsto controlthemassmediabymanipulatingevidence,intimidatingreporterswith threats

258

ofridiculeordismissalforinvestigatingUFOreports,andensuringcensorshipby editorsandmediaowners.494

Thesame clandestine organizations responsible for this global policy of non-disclosure, has the power to orchestrate international crises and events to bring aboutfavorable policy outcomes.495 This ability is due to officials in these clandestineorganizations being appointed rather than elected, and their policies not beingscrutinizedinthepublicarena.

This gives such officials great freedom in formulating and implementing publicpolicy without the supervision and accountability that elected officials regularlyexperience.Furthermore,officials in clandestineorganizationsareappointedwithoutthehandicapof short-termelectionprocesses thatstymie long termplanningon thepartofelected publicofficials. In short,orches- trating internationalevents toattain key foreignpolicy objectivesiswellwithintheinstitutionalcapabilitiesand resourcesoforgan-izationsled by appointedofficialswho lackpublicaccountabilityandsupervision.

The possibility that ET technology lay hidden in Iraq, which had a level ofsophisticationfaradvancedtowhateverhadbeenreverseengineeredbyrecoveredETcraftsince 1941, would havemadeunfetteredaccesstoIraq acrucial policy goal forUSbasedclandestineorganizations.Thiswouldhavebeenaccentuatedifit were confirmedthatthehomeworldof the Anunnakiwould soon be returning to the Earth’s vicinity of the solarsystem.

The existenceandlocationof theseancientETsites,whichhad likelybeendiscoveredby theIraqis inthe1980sas aresultof theirextensiveundergroundconstructionprojects,was alsopossiblyknown by thosestateswho hadlongprovidedtechni-cal assistancetoIraq: Russia, France,Germany andChina.US based clandestine organizations weretherefore at arelativedisadvantagetotheir Europeanpartners/rivalsingainingaccesstothisETtechnology.USbasedclandestineorganizationsorchestratedthe first Gulf Warin ordertoprovidetheUSthedesiredaccess.

Subsequently,Saddamdidgo ahead withawaragainstKuwaiton August1990,andcontrary to the message delivered by Glaspie, he found that the US was resolutelyopposed toIraq’sinvasionanddidnotfavoranycompromiseoverthe

259

territorial integrity of Kuwait. In theprotracteddiplomaticdialogue oversecuringIraq’s withdrawal, the first Bush administration ruled out anyconcessionsto Iraq.ThismeantthatSoviet/Russiandiplomacy,motivatedby awarenessthat a war would appreciably diminish Russian influence in Iraq and its relativeadvantageingainingaccessto andcontrollingETtechnology,wouldultimatelyfail.

Failureofthe Bushadministrationto supportanyface-savingcompromiseensuredthat a full-scalewarwould be fought to “liberate” Kuwait. TheUS led multinationalmilitaryinterventionthatbeganin January1991resultedin theexpul-sion of Iraq fromKuwait. An important consequence was that theUS, for the first time, had a strategicfootholdin Iraq with anumberof Security Council resolutionsgiving legitimacy to thecontinuedUSpresenceas longas issuesrelevantto theGulfWar remainedunresolved.TheUSStrategicBindaftertheFirst GulfWarUnfortunately,from theperspectiveof thefirstBush administra-tion,theUSwas notabletoforceregimechangein Iraq aftertheendhostilitiesin the“liberation”of Kuwait. TheUSspon-sorshipof a massuprisingby Iraq’sKurdish andShiite commu-nitiesdidnotleadto the fall ofSaddam’sregimeoncetherebellingethniccommunitieswere deniedthepromisedmili-tary supportfrom theUSled alliance.

Consequently, Saddam’s regime was able to reestablish control by brutallysuppressingthe uprising.ThismeantUSbasedclandestineorganizationswerenow inastrategicbind intermsof accessingandexploitingtheETtechnologyunderthecontrolofSaddam’sregime.The USdidnothavethe interna-tionalauthoritytoforciblyreplaceSaddam’s regime andSaddam undoubtedly felt betrayed by the US. He could beexpected to cooperate further with Russian, European and Chinese clandestine organizations ingiving access toand exploitingETtechnology, and thereby frustrateclandestineUSorganizations.ClandestineEuropeangroupstogetherwith

260

their Russian andChinesepartnerswere ina strongerstrategicposition to theirUS partners/rivals in gaining access to and exploitingwhatever ETtechnologyexistedinIraq.

Saddamwas intenton having hisvengeanceagainsttheUSand Britainby denyingallaccess to them.Given that the US had the most sophisticated reverse engineering programontheplanetand was rapidly developingglobalpreponderanceas theworld’slonesuperpower,thiswasa scenariothatwasdeeplydisturbingforUSofficials awareofthepossibleimplicationsofthe ET technologyin Iraqto influencethe globalbalanceofpower.At thesame time, European/Russian/Chinese clandestinegroupswere concernedover thepotentialfor theUStoextendits technologicalsuperiorityandglobaldominanceifit gainedaccesstoIraq’sETtechnology.

An unexpectedobstacleto theplanof USbasedclandes-tineorganizations to gainaccesstoETtechnologyin Iraq wasthesurpriseelectionofPresidentBillClinton in1992.Unlike the first President Bush, Clinton was not privileged to key informa- tionconcerningtheclandestineprogramsinvolving ETtechnol-ogy andcommunications.496

As discussedin Chapter Two, since the Kennedyadminis- tration, there has been apolicy of not disclosing full details of theETpresence and ET technology to sittingPresidents,as this threatened thenon-disclosurepolicyand lackofexecutive supervisionenjoyedby USbasedclandestineorganizations.497As a former head of the Central Intelligence Agency, President Bush was aware ofinformationonETsbeforeheassumedhisPresidency.

Indeed,Bush likelyplayedtherole of rubberstampingthemostsignificantpoliciesproposed bythe clandestinepolicycoordinatinggroupresponsiblefor ETaffairs—MJ-12/PI-40.

Early in his administration,Clintondemonstrated an inter-est in theETpresencethatthreatened thenon-disclosurepol-icy of clandestineorganizationsandtheirpoliticalagenda in gaining complete access to Iraq’s ET heritage. Clinton’s handson policymakingstyle was a direct threat to MJ-12/PI-40, the top policymaking group for ETaffairs. Subsequently, Clinton was denied the information he required if someexecutivesupervisionweretooccurforETaffairs.498

261

Moreover, key officials in the Bushadministration,including

Secretary of DefenseWilliamCohen, appeared tobe out of the information loop.499 Predictably,littlehappened duringtheClintonadministrationfor movingaheadwiththeagenda ofgainingunfetteredaccesstoIraq’sETheritage.

The electionof thesecondBush administrationmeantthattheagenda of clandestineUSorganizationsfor gainingaccessto Iraq’s ET heritage couldresume. Many formerofficials fromthe first Bush and earlier Republican administrations supporting regimechange in Iraq were appointed in the new administration. As a result of theirassociationwiththe Department ofDefense,many ifnot all of thesewould havebeenfamiliarwithclandestineactivitiesto reverseengineerET technologyandthetruereasonmotivatingregimechangeinIraq.

TheseofficialsincludedSecretaryofDefense,DonaldRumsfeld;his deputyPaulWolfowitz;Richard Perle,chairmanoftheDefensePolicyBoard,aPentagonadvisorypanel;DouglasFeith, UndersecretaryofDefensefor Policy; and finally,Vice PresidentRichardCheney,who was Secretaryof DefenseinthefirstBushAdministration.500 Theterrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, provided the vehicle for the Bush admin-istrationgainingsupportforeradicatingglobalterrorismwhereveritmanifested.

OncetheBush administrationcouldmakea plausiblecasethatIraqwasasponsorofglobal terrorism and that it had concealed weapons of mass destruction thatconstitutedathreattotheUS,itcoulddevelopthenecessarypublicsupportfor invadingIraq.To achieve thisgoal, the Officeof SpecialPlans was created in the Pentagon to“invigorate”intelligenceassessmentsof theterrorist threatposed by Iraq. According tointelligenceanalysts:

The premisebehindtheoffice seemedtobethatcareeranalystsinsidethe intelligencecommunity,andspecifi-callytheCIA,werenotgraspingthehardrealitiesaboutIraqanditsweaponsofmassdestruction,andthatafreshsetof eyesexaminingmuchofthesameinforma-tioncouldmakecriticallinks.[Assistant Secretary]Wolfowitztold theNewYorkTimes last year thatthereis

262

“aphenomenoninintelligenceworkthatpeoplewhoarepursuinga certainhypothesiswillseecertainfactsthatotherswon’t, and not seeotherfacts thatotherswill.”501

Accordingto aformerCIA counter-terrorismchief,VinceCannistraro,it’sclear “the

decisionwasmadewithin a coupleofmonthsofSept.11to get ridofSaddamHussein.But theadministration had to find rationale to do it. So they set up a secretive groupthrough [Douglas] Feith which started producing information on Iraq that was morecompatiblethantheCIA.”502The DangerousRiftbetweenUSandEuropeanClandestineOrganizationsIn the buildupto the threatened preemptivewarin Iraq,anumberofinternationaleventshad occurredthat indicatedthatclandestineEuropean/Russian/Chineseorganizations were at odds with their US partners/rivals. Germany was the first major nation thatpublicly committed itself to ruling out a preemptive war against Iraq, regardless ofprogress in theweapons inspection process that began after passage of SecurityCouncilResolution1441on November8, 2002.

Germany’s stakingout the extreme positionmade it possible for France, and thenRussia, totakeup themoremoderatepositionof only calling for military interventionifIraq failed tocomplywithResolution 1441.France andRussia,effectively stymied USeffortsin passing a further resolution callingfor international military intervention inIraqto removeanypro-scribedweaponsofmassdestruction.

If thediplomaticmaneuveringweresimply aboutweaponsofmass destruction,thenitwould befair tosay that theUSwas acting in abellicose and imperialistmanner indemanding a further UN Security Council Resolution to bring about closure to theweapons inspection process. However, sinceWestern intervention in Iraq has longbeensecretlymotivatedbygainingaccessto Iraq’streasure houseof ET technology,thediplomaticbehaviorofFrance,Russia, Germanyand also Chinaneedstobe understood inthis context.

263

Manyhave viewed thediplomaticoppositionbythepowerful

trio ofFrance,Russia andGermanytoa USled preemptive waras beingclearly in theinterestsof theworld communityunited against the horror of an unnecessary war thatwoulddevastatethePersianGulf region,andusherinmoreactsof terrorismintheMiddleEast and elsewhere.503 However, what secretly motivated these nations was theawarenessthatUSaccesstoET technologyinIraqwouldconstituteathreat due to thegrowing power of US based clandestine organizations and their secret reverseengineeringprojects.

US successes in gaining access to and employing reverse engineering ETtechnologyin Iraq wouldhavebeena concernfor their less well fundedand technicallyproficient partners/rivals in Russia, France,Germany andChina. Furthermore,the accessenjoyedby thelatterinaccessingthis technologyin Iraq, wouldhavegiventhemsomeinsight into thecapabilities of this technology andhelped balance the technological advantagesenjoyedby theUS.

More important,European/Russian/Chineseorganizationswereabletowork withinwhatever constraints imposed by the regime of Saddam Hussein in reaching apreliminaryunder-standingof the capabilitiesof thistechnology.A preemptivewar thatamountedto a unilateraltakeoverof Iraqby theUSandBritain,wassomething thatEuropean/Russian/Chineseorganizationswould not support,giventheincreasedopportu-nities totheUSinincreasingits technologicaladvantagesandglobaldominance.

Inshort, Europewas inangstover theprospectofan alreadydominant US growingmorepowerfulwith acquisitionof evenmore sophisticatedET technology.This wouldhaveparalleledthe classicstorynarratedbythe Greekhistorian,Thucydides,who claimedthat thegrowth inAtheniannaval power in the5thcenturyBC led to fear on the part ofotherGreekcity states thatallied themselves withSparta tobring about a long anddevastatingwar thatled totheeventualdefeatofAthens.504

Wasthe US takingacoursethatwassimilarto AncientAthens,wherebyUS growthin imperial power would unite othermajor world states in an opposing alliance thatcould leadtodevastatingconfrontation?

264

It ispossiblethatEuropean/Russian/Chineseclandestine

organizationshadtacitly signaledtotheir UScounterparts thata unilateral takeover ofIraq was notacceptable.The destruc-tion of theSpaceShuttleColumbiaon February1certainly was a high profile event that shocked the planet. The timing of the event,however,indicatesthatitmay havebeena highprofilevictim of a clandestinestruggleoverwhowouldhaveaccessandcontrolover Iraq’sETheritage.

Ina reporttoNASAbyLarryPark, aSystemsFailureAnalystattempting to identifythe cause of the Columbia disaster, he claims that the disasterwas caused by a freakconvergenceofscalarelectromagneticenergyin the mesosphere thatstrucktheShuttleduringits returntoEarth.505Park’sreportpointstothe possibleuseof“scalarweaponry”in the destruction ofColumbia.Suchweaponry uses an innovative form of electro-magnetic energy that, according to a retired US army colonel and scientist ThomasBearden,was also used in thedestructionof theChallengerSpaceShuttleon January28,1986, and other US aviation “accidents” over the last three decades for which theseweaponshavebeendevelopedandused.506

According toBearden,“The Challenger was positively killed by the Soviet Union,using the scalar EM weapons through th eWoodpecker grid. A host of indicatorsoccurred.”507

The “Woodpecker grid”accordingto Bearden,was causedby theactivation inJuly1976 ofpowerfulSoviet transmittersthatbeamedahigh frequencybandofenergyaroundthe planet with an enormous power of at least 100 megawatts. “These powerfultransmitterswerepromptlynicknamed‘Woodpeckers’becauseof thecharacteristicsoundof the chirpedsignalwhenreceived.That is, the received signalmade a pecking soundmuchlikeawoodpecker’sbeakhittingablock ofwood.”508

Weather conditions in the mesosphere that Park identified as having caused theColumbia tragedy were similar to theweather indicators that Bearden identified asaccompanying the destruction of the Challenger. The use and possession of scalarweaponryinthe arsenalsofclandestineorganizationsaroundtheplanet,madeitpossibleandlikelythatitwas usedagainsttheColumbiatosenda powerfulpoliticalmessageto

265

theBushadministrationoveritsintendedpreemptivewaragainstIraq.

Beginninginmid-February2003,when theprospective wardominated internationaldiplomacy, an unusual amount of seismic activity had begun to occur around theplanet.509 Althoughmuchspeculationsurrounded the causeandseriousnessoftheseseismic anomalies, it is worth exploring whether the anomalies were caused byadvanced weapons technology thatwas eitherbeing testedor extensivelyused,globally.Existenceof advanced weaponry that could produce seismic activity, volcanoes andsevere weatherconditionswaspubliclyacknowl-edged byaspeech given byformerSecretary ofDefense,William Cohen, in 1997 at a conference discussing the threatposed byglobal terrorism: “Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type ofterrorismwhereby they can alter thecli-mate, setoff earthquakes, volcanoes remotelythroughtheuseofelectromagneticwaves. . .”510

Cohen’s speech was notwidely reported and indeed has been withdrawn from thepublicarchivesof theDepartment ofDefense, therebysuggesting that thedevelopment anduseofsuch technology remainshighly classified. Ina number of books and papersdiscussing“scalarweapons” capable of the effects described by Cohen, Col. Beardensuggests thatsuch technol-ogyhasbeen developed fordecades by the former SovietUnion andotherstates.AccordingtoBearden:

In January 1960,Khrushchev announced the develop-ment of a new, fantastic weapon—onesopowerfulitcouldwipeoutall life onearthif unrestrainedlyused.TheNewYorkTimes printedpart ofthestory.Khrushchev,ofcourse,was referringtothenewlyemergingscalar EMweapons.So in early 1960 the Sovietswere in atleastwhatwecallthe engineeringdevelopmentstage forlargescalarEMbeamweapons,whichwouldbedeployedwhen finished.511

He provides extensive evidence that seismic andweather anomalies over the lastthirty years haveoftenbeencausedbythesescalar weapons.512

266

Ifanomalousseismicactivity sincemid-February,2003was

causedby scalarweaponry,thenit is very likely thata secretmilitaryconflicthadbeenoccurring between clandestinegroups overaccessandcontrolof ET technology inIraq.It islikelythatEuropean/Russian/Chineseclandestineorganizationswereactive insuch awar thatwas usedtorestrainUSefforts totake sole controlofIraq’sETheritage.The targetsofsuch scalarweaponswouldhavebeen the numerousundergroundfacili-ties of each country’s respective clandestine organizations around the planet fordeveloping ET technology. The existence of such bases were revealed by PhilSchneider,a formercivilengineeremployedby military contractorsfor constructionofsuch bases,ina seriesof lecturesshortly beforewhat appeared tobehis murderby acontractkilling.513

Ifasecretwarbetweenclandestineorganizationshadoccurred bothpriorto andsimultaneously withUSmilitary intervention in Iraq, then itwas likely that the UNSecurityCouncilResolutionreachedon May 22, 2003,signaleda “newunderstanding”hadbeen reachedby competingclandestineorganizations.

It has been accepted that US intervention could not b ereversed and that UNhumanitarian assistance and reconstruction would help heal the rift between themajorallies. However, therewas still intensedisagreement over the degree towhich powerandauthority would be shared if the US had formalmilitary assistance fromEurope andRussia in containing the upsurge in guerilla violence that emerged after the May 1cessationofhostilitiesspeechbyPresidentBush.

France’sUN envoy,whorespondedtoanappealby ColinPowell on August21, 2003formilitary assistanceincounteringguerillaattacks,delivereda revealingstatementaboutthe fact that control and power over Iraq’s resources continue to be at the core of thedisputebetweentheUSandEurope/Russia/China:

Emerging fromameeting with Secretary General KofiAnnan this morning,Mr.Powell told reporters that “we’re looking at, of course, reaffirming ourdeterminationtosucceedinIraq.We’relookingforwardtolanguagethatmightcallonmemberstatesto domore.”Shortly

267

afterward, France’s deputyambassador,MichelDuclos,toldaSecurityCouncilmeetingthattheeconomicandpoliticalreconstructionofIraq will not succeed i fWashington insists on maintaining sole control of theprocess.“Sharingthe burden andresponsibilityinaworld ofequaland sovereignnationsalsomeanssharinginformationand authority,”Mr.Duclos said.514

Evidencecontinues to suggest that intense disagreement over the controlover Iraq

existsandthis caneasilyleadtoaviolentstrugglebetweenclandestineorganizationsthatiskeptfromthepublicarena.Giventhepowerofthe“exotic”weaponrypossessedbyclandestinemilitarygroups,thismeanstheplanetisenteringa dangerousperiod.Aslongasdisagree-mentexists over thedegreetowhich ETartifactsinIraq aretobecontrolledandusedby theUS, violentoppositionby non-USbasedclandestinegroupsis likely tooccur.This is likelytoresultin continuedinstabilityin Iraq as longas theUSrefusestosharerealpowerwith othermajorstatesin thereconstruc-tion of Iraq.Conclusion:America’sTriumphandEurope’sAngstThe successfulmilitary interventionandtakeoverof Iraq by theUSand Britain representtheculmination of a decades long policy of gaining access and control of Iraq’s ETartifacts.Originallybegunas a cooperative venturebetween theUSandEuropeanbasedclandestineorganizationsdesiringtoaccessandcontrolIraq’s ETassetsfrom theSovietUnion,the shift in geopoliticsmeanttheseformerallies found themselves on opposingsidesof an intensediplomaticstruggleoverwhenandhowmilitaryinterventionshouldoccurinIraq.

Failureofadiplomaticsolutiontothe2003 crisisover Iraq’spurportedweaponsofmass destruction marked a breakbetween US based clandestine organizations andtheirformerpartners,andnowrivalsincontinentalEurope whoalignedthemselveswithRussia andChina.

268

RatherthandifferencesbetweentheUSandits continental

European allies being a temporary diplomatic spat that will disappear as newinternational issuesemerge, it appears that a fundamental change has occurred in thegeopoliticalalliancesandrivalriesoverthe acquisitionandcontrolofET artifactsaroundthe planet. Whatever geopolitical balance was achieved by dividing the planet into“spheres of influence” appears tohave beenbrokenwith theUSaction in Iraq, therebypromptinga shift inalliancesbetweenclandestineorganizations.

Opposition of France, Germany, Russia and China over preemptive militaryinterventionin Iraq hasindicatedthata majorconcernoftheclandestineorganizationsofthese countries is thegrowing power of US based clandestine organizations that pre-sumably have thelion’sshareofaccessand controlofETtechnol-ogy around theplanet.The strategicimportanceof Iraq intermsof its legacyas amajor baseof operationsfortheAnunnaki; theexistence of “Stargate technology” in Iraq; the activities of rem- nantAnunnakionEarth;andthe possiblemassreturnoftheAnunnakiand/ortheirhomeworld;were all sufficient to spark violent conflict between clandestine organizations withoutpublicdisclosurethatsuch secretmilitaryconflict was occurring.

Heightenedseismicactivitiesandthe destructionoftheColumbiaSpaceShuttlewerethe most visible indicators of the use of powerful exotic weapons such as scalarelectromagnetic devices due to concerns overUS imperial ambitions in Iraq, and itsoversteppingtacit internationalprinciplesthatactedasa balance for howET artifactsweretobe accessedandcon-trolledbymajor states.

Inapolitical climatewheretheBushadministrationappearsintentona foreignpolicyof preemptivemilitary interventionsupportedby a small numberof loyal allies, thereis likelihood of increased global conflict as US based clandestine organiza- tionsstruggle for best strategic advantage over their European/Russian/Chinese rivals inaccessingandcontrollingETartifactsaroundtheplanet.

Continental European clandestine organizations find them-selves in the unfamiliarpositions of having to ally themselves with Russia and China in order to balance theimperial aspirations

269

of US based organizations. If predictionsareaccuratethatthehomeworldoftheadvancedraceofETs—theAnunnakidescribedbySitchin—willsoon reappear, this would onlyheighten concern over the strategic advantages establishedbyUS based clandestineorganizationsandpossible conflictwith their mostdeterminedrivalsinRussiaandChina.515

All clandestine organizations are apparently competing for the best strategicposition in a race for ET technology and knowledge that may be necessary in aforthcoming ET confrontation/encounter that determines the future of humancivilization as we know it. The US led military intervention and takeover of Iraqrepresentssuccessof a decades-longsecretpolicy of securingUSaccess to Iraq’s ETheritage.

The pricepaidforAmerica’striumphisEurope’sangstoverwhatthe US intends todo with the strategic advantage it enjoys in accessing and controlling Iraq’s ETheritage,andthechangingbalanceofpowerbetweenclandestineorganizationsovertheiraccessandcontrolof ETtechnology.There appears tono longerbea balance in theETtechnologiespossessedbyclandestineorganizations.This spellsdangeroustimesaheadas these organizations try to steer through the challenges of growth in US power,possiblereturnof theAnunnaki,andallthechallengesthis posesforglobalhumanity.

Notes

460. For a CNN report on Daschle’s comments go to: http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/03/18/sprj.irq.daschle.gop/index.html.In contrast, Henry Kissinger described theoppositionofFranceandGermanyto supportafurtherresolutionwhichwouldhaveimposedaformaldeadlinefor Iraq’sfull compliance with existingSecurityCouncil resolutions as the “gravest crisis” in the history of theAtlantic alliance. See Henry Kissinger, “The Atlantic Alliance in its Gravest Crisis,” 2003, Tribune MediaServicesInternational,

2/9/03:http://www.tmsfeatures.com/tmsfeatures/subcategory.jsp.461.Foracopyofthe Resolution,go to:http://www.globalpolicy.org/

security/issues/iraq/document/2003/0522resolution.htm.462.ZechariaSitchin,The12thPlanet:Book1 ofthe EarthChronicles

(AvonBooks, 1976).

270

http://www.tmsfeatures.com/tmsfeatures/subcategory.jsp

http://www.globalpolicy.org/

463.ZechariaSitchin, The Wars of GodsandMen:BookIII of theEarth

Chronicles(AvonBooks, 1996).464.See ChapterFiveformoreinformationon thosesupportingSitchin’sclaims.465.For criticism of Sitchin’s translations,seeMichael S.Heiser,“Sitchin’sMesopotamian Rocket Ships: How toIgnoreAncientMesopotamianDictionaries,”Publishedonlineat:http://www.facadenovel.com/sitchinsrockets.htm.466. For information about the reverse engineering efforts by clandestine organizations within the defensedepartment, see Phillip Corso, TheDay After Roswell (Pocket Star, 1997). For description of various gov-ernment agencies involved in these efforts, see Steven M. Greer, Extraterrestrial Contact: The Evidence andImplications(CrossingPoint Publications,1999).

467.“PresidentTrumanto SecretaryofDefenseJamesForrestal,”24September1947;availableonline at: http://www.majesticdocuments.com/documents/pre1948.html.468.For documentaryevidencedealingwith many of theseorganizations,go to http://www.majesticdocuments.com.For a detailed analysis o fthese US based organizations, see Richard Boylan, “The ShadowGovernment: ItsIdentificationand Analysis”: http://www.drboylan.com/ shadgovt2.html. For an account on how these organizations havegrown and becomefreefrom executiveoversight,seeChapterTwo.

469.Fordetailsofthesereverseengineeringefforts, seePhilipCorso,TheDayAfter Roswell.

470.Corso,The DayAfter Roswell.471.Corso,The DayAfter Roswell. Seealso witnesstestimoniesinGreer,ed.,Disclosure.

472.See ChapterThreeformoreinformationon theNazi-ETconnection.473.DanSherman,AboveBlack.Availableonlineat:http://www.aboveblack.com.474.Apopularpsychic “channel”communicatingwith ETracesis JelailaStarr, WeAretheNibiruans. See herwebsiteat:http://www.nibiruancouncil.com.475.For discussionon theintelligencepotentialof RemoteViewing, seeRussellTargandHaroldPuthoff, Mind-Reach: Scientists Look at Psychic Ability (London: Jonathan Cape, 1977). For remoteviewing of ET races, seeCourtneyBrown, CosmicExplorers.476.SeeChapterThreefordiscussionof theglobalmanagementsystemsetup todealwithETaffairs.477. For description of the Bilderberggroup, see ArmenVictorian, “TheBilderbergGroup—The Invisible PowerHouse,” Nexus magazine, 3:1 (Dec ‘95-Jan ‘96). Available online at: http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/Bilderbergers.html.

271

http://www.facadenovel.com/

http://www.majesticdocuments



http://www.nexusmagazine.com/

478.Fordiscussionofthe Bilderberg’sfocusonthe ETquestionsee

Richard Boylan,“Bilderberg Council’sInternalStruggle overUFODisclosure,” in Boylan andBoylan, LaboredJourneyTo TheStars.Available onlineat: http://www.drboylan.com/bldrbg2.html.

479.See Jim Marrs, RuleBySecrecy(HarperCollins, 2000).480.LalKhan,“The MenaceofIslamicFundamentalismand theHypocrisyof Imperialism”2000.Availableonlineat:http://www.marxist.com/Asia/islamic_fund_ism1100.html.481.Fordescription ofhowhuman rightsmarked a new phase in US foreign policy, see Michael Salla, TheHero’sJourneyTowardaSecondAmericanCentury(PraegerPress, 2002)163–78.482.For an accountofAyatollah Khomeini’s activitiesinFranceandtheirimpacton theShah’s regime,seeMohsenM.Milani,The MakingofIran’sIslamicRevolution(Westview Press, 1988).483. For an online analysis of the factors driving Iraq’s decision to invade Iran, see Federation of AmericanScientists—Military Analysis Network, “Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988)”: http://www.fas.org/man/ dod-101/ops/war/iran-iraq.htm.

484.Fora descriptionof US supportfor Iraqduringits war, seeBruceW. Jentleson,With FriendsLikeThese:Reagan,Bush, andSaddam1982–1990 (W.W.Norton&Company,October1994). For an onlinediscussionof WesternSupport, seeKathleenKnox, “Iraq:RelationsWithTheWestHaven’tAlwaysBeenContentious,” RadioFreeEurope, March12, 2003:http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/2003/03/12032003160413.asp.485.For an accountof theactionsleadingup to theOsirak bombing, see Efraim Karsh and Inari Rautsi, SaddamHussein,APolitical Biography(The FreePress,1993),Pages126–128. Seealso, SeymourM.Hersh,The SampsonOption:Israel’sNuclearArsenal and AmericanForeignPolicy (New York:RandomHouse,1991) 8–13; andAmosPerlmutter,etal.,TwoMinutesOver Baghdad(London: Valentine,Mitchell &Co.Ltd., 1982).486. Robert Tanner, “Troops begin combing Baghdad tunnels,”Associated Press,April 09, 2003.Availableonlineat:http://www.militarycity.com/iraq/1756855.html.487.DanaPriest,“ClosingIn on BaghdadWill Push War Underground,”WashingtonPost (April5, 2003) A25.Available onlineat: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32294-2003Apr4.html.488.WilliamHenry describesSaddam’spreoccupation with Iraq’s ancient(ET) heritage inhisbook Ark of theChristos: The Mythology,SymbolismandProphecyof the Return of PlanetX and the Age of Terror. An articlesummarizing his thesis is called, “Saddam Hussein, The Stairway toHeaven and the Return of Planet X” and isavailableonlineathiswebsiteathttp://www.williamhenry.net.

272

http://www.drboylan.com/bldrbg2.html

http://www.marxist.com/

http://www.fas.org/man/

http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/2003/03/


489.ForanaccountofIraq’snumeroushumanrightsviolations,seeMiddleEastWatch,HumanRightsinIraq(HumanRightsWatchBooks, 1990).490.For discussionof thehistoricaldimensionsof Iraq’s claim toKuwait,see H. Rahman,TheMakingofthe GulfWar:OriginsofKuwait’sLong-StandingTerritorialDisputeWith Iraq (Ithaca, 1998).491.For discussionof circumstancesleadingtothegulf war see,HassanA. El-Najjar, TheGulf War: Overreaction& Excessiveness (Amazon Press, 2001). For an online transcript of the interview, go to:http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html.492.For description of Glaspie’s“punishment,” see AndrewI. Killgore, “Special Report: Tales of the ForeignService:In Defenseof AprilGlaspie,”WashingtonReportonMiddleEastAffairs (August2002)49:http://www.wrmea.com/archives/august2002/0208049.html.493.SeeChapterTwo for furtherdiscussiononthe policycoordinatingorganizationsthatdealtwithETissues.494.Forfurtherdiscussionofhowthe mediadistorts coverageoftheUFO/ETpresence, see TerryHansen, TheMissingTimes(XlibrisCorporation;2001).

495.Seealso Jim Marrs, Rule BySecrecy;andDavid Icke,And The TruthShallSet YouFree.496. For evidence that President Clinton was not fully informed of the ET presence and the various USclandestineorganizationsset uptorespondtothispresences, seeStevenGreer,“WhoAretheControllers?”CSETINewsletter,3:1(May1994):http://www.cseti.org/position/greer/who.htm.SeealsoPresidentialUFOFilesformore information concerning President Clinton’s knowledge of the ET presence:http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/clinton.htm.SeealsoChapterTwo.497.SeeChapterTwo for discussionof the gradualerosionof executiveoversightof the clandestineorganizationsfocusedontheETpres-enceandETtechnology.498.Foranassessmentof PresidentClinton’spolicymakingstyle,andcomparisonwithotherUSpresidents, seeThomasPreston,ThePresidentandHisInnerCircle:LeadershipStyleandtheAdvisoryProcessinForeignPolicyMaking(ColumbiaUniversityPress, 2001).499. Dr. Steven Greer Interview with Art Bell August 30, 2001, available online at:http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/part5.htm.500.Fordiscussionoftheascendancyof theseneo-conservativethinkersandtheir views on Iraq, seeStevenWeisman, “Pre-emption: Idea With a Lineage Whose Time Has Come,” New York Times (March 22, 2003):http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/23/international/worldspecial/23PREE.html.

273

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html

http://www.wrmea.com/archives/august2002/0208049.html

http://www.cseti.org/

http://www.presidentialufo.8m.com/clinton.htm


http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/23/international/

501. Eric Boehlert, “Rumsfeld’s personal spy ring,” InformationClearing House (July 16, 2003).Availableonlineat:http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4124.htm.502. Eric Boehlert, “Rumsfeld’s personal spy ring,” InformationClearing House (July 16, 2003).Availableonlineat:http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4124.htm.

503.Forcriticismof preemptivewar againstIraq,see RichardFalk andDavidKrieger, “No WarAgainst Iraq,” WagingPeace.org(August 23,2002).

504.Thucydides,History of thePeloponnesianWar (VikingPress, 2003).505.MarshallMasters,“FailureAnalystIdentifiesCauseofColumbiaDisaster,”YOWUSA.com, March24, 2003:http://www.yowusa.com/Archive/March2003/scalar1/scalar1.htm.

506.SeeT.E.Bearden,“HistoricalBackgroundof ScalarEMWeapons,”1990paperavailableonlineat:http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm.507. T.E. Bearden, “Historical Background of Scalar EM Weapons,” 1990 paper available online at:http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm.508. “Wood Pecker Beams Intersect Over North America,” available online at:http://www.cheniere.org/books/ferdelance/s63.htm.509.For real time andarchivedseismicrecordsfor theUSandtheworld,go to US Geological Surveywebsiteat:http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recent.510.QuotedfromWilliamS.Cohen,“Q&AattheConference onTerrorism,Weapons ofMass Destruction, andU.S.Strategy—UniversityofGeorgia,Athens,”DoD News Briefing. Apr. 28,1997.511. T.E. Bearden, “Historical Background of Scalar EM Weapons,” 1990 paper available online at:http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm.SeealsoThomasBearden,Ferde Lance:A BriefingonSovietScalarElectromagneticWeapons,2nded.,(ChenierePress, 2001).512. T.E. Bearden, “Historical Background of Scalar EM Weapons,” 1990 paper available online at:http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/ history.htm. In some correspondence, Bearden discusses the possi- bleterroristusesof scalar weaponry,goto: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/021203.htm.Fordiscussion of theuse of scalar weapons in Iraq, see Bill Morgan, “Iraq: World’s First Scalar War?” published online at:http://216.247.92.101/pub/bearden/iraq.htm.

513.SeePhil Schneider,“MUFONConferencePresentation,May 1995”availableonlineat: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/coverup044.html. See also, “Tim Schwartz, The Mysterious Life and Death of Phil Schneider”: http://www.think-aboutit.com/Underground/mysterious_life_and_death_of_phi.htm.

274

http://www.yowusa.com/

http://www.cheniere.org/books/

http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/

http://www.cheniere.org/books/ferdelance/s63.htm

http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/



http://www.cheniere.org/

http://216.247.92.101/pub/bearden/iraq.htm


http://www.think-aboutit.com/

514.FelicityBarringer,“U.S. PressesU.N.MemberstoBear Moreof Iraq

Burden,” New York Times, August 21, 2003. Available online at:http://nytimes.com/2003/08/22/international/worldspecial/22NATI.html.515.SeeMarkHazlewood,Blindsided:PlanetXPassesin2003(FirstpublishLLC,2001).Hazlewoodmaintainsawebsiteat:http://www.planetx2003.com/index.html.SeealsoJimMcCanney,Planet-X,CometsandEarthChanges(jmcanneyscience.com,n.d.).McCanneymaintainsa websiteat: http://www.jmccanneyscience.com.See also Nancy Leider, Zetatalk: Direct Answers from theZeta ReticuliPeople(GranitePublishing, 1999).Leider

maintainsawebsiteat:http://www.zetatalk.com/://www.zetatalk.com.

275

http://nytimes.com/2003/08/22/international/worldspecial/22NATI


http://www.jmccanneyscience.com

http://www.zetatalk.com

Chapter7

FirstContact:PreparingforOpen InteractionwithExtraterrestrialRaces

Introduction516Inthe popularStarTrekmotionpicturemovieseries,FirstContactis described asaneventfeaturingthe landingof anextraterrestrial(ET)racewhere a meetingoccurswithgovern-mentofficials andnewsof this is relayed to the publicaround the planet.Openinteractionbetweenmembersof thegeneralpublicandtheETracethenbegins.

In the motionpicture series, the Earthmakes a transition from a planet emergingfromthe ruins of devastatingwar, tobecomingamemberof agalactic federation ofplanets that leads to rapid advances in technology that solve many of the world’sproblems,andopeninteractionwithETraces.

What is instructive in this fictionalized version of Earth’s transformation into aninterplanetaryculture is thatthere arethree partsto the First Contact event:1. officialgovernmentrepresentativesmeetingwithavisitingET race,2.apublicannouncementofthismeeting,and3.openinteractionbetweenETracesandthegeneralpublic.

According to anumber ofunconfirmed reports, the first part of a First Contacteventoccurred asearlyas the 1930swhenvariousET racesbegan to communicate andevenmeetwith official government representatives in different countriesaround theworld.ThesereportssuggestthatmeetingstookplacebetweenNaziGermanofficialsandETracesin1933,andthatPresidentRooseveltmetwithETracesas early as 1933.517Ofthese unconfirmedreportsthe onesthatare mostsup-portedbywhistleblower

testimoniesaremeetingsthat

276

occurredbetweenrepresentativesof theEisenhoweradminis-trationanddifferentETraces.

The secret meetings, according to these testimonies,culminated in a Treatybetweenthe US governmentandanETracethatwasreportedly signedin1954 byPresidentEisenhowerhimself.518 Oneof the reportedprovisionsof theTreaty was thatthe ET race concerned would not sign another treaty with any other nationalgovernment.Unlikethe StarTrekmotionpicture series,however, the second partoftheFirst Contactevent—publicdisclosure of a meetingbetweengovernment officialsandmembersofanET race—hasnotoccurred.

Efforts topromotefullpublicdisclosureof theETpresenceandofficial governmentinvolvementwith ETraceshavethusfar provedineffective.519Giventhealmost70yearsthat such government meetings with ET races have occurred, if whistle- blowertestimoniesareaccurate,this would godowninhistoryasthe best keptpublicsecret ofall times.Thereare reportshowever,thata partialdisclosurecampaignhasbeeninitiatedthroughaclandestine acclimation program inwhichformerpublicofficials fromthemilitary andintelligencebranchesofgovernmentaretacitly givenpermissiontoreleasestatements,give interviewsandevenwrite bookson theETpresence.

OfthesethemostnoteworthyisabookauthoredbyCol. PhillipCorsowhosestrongmilitary credentialsgivespow-erful legitimacytohis claims that he was involved withand evenled a topsecretUSarmy effort toreverseengineerETtechnol-ogyrecoveredfromthe1947Roswell crashof anET pilotedcraft. The emergenceofover onehundredwitnesses, who have given video testimony of their participation in various ET/UFOrelated issues, is further evidence that a partial disclosure or acclimation program isunderway.520 Whistleblower testimonies have confirmed the existence of such anacclimation program and its various supporters and opponents in clandestine gov-ernmentorganizationsinchargeofETaffairs.521

Absence of full disclosurehasdelayed open interactionbetween ETracesand thehumanpopulation.However,a num-berof testimoniessuggestthattherehas beenrapidgrowthinthenumberofcasesofindividualsreportingtohavehadsome

277

sort of interactionwithETraces.TheseinteractionsrangefromclosesightingsofUFOs/ET controlledcraft tophysicalcontactwithETraces.

The classificationsystemdeveloped by ProfessorAllenHynekin 1972for describingencounterswithETracescomprisedthreetypesof CloseEncounters(CE):CE-1, physicalsightings withinapproximately 500feet;CE-2, physical evidence such as burns, stalledengines,etc.;andCE-3,physicalsightingofanET inassociationwithaCE-1/CE-2.522

Hynek’ssystemhas subsequently beenextendedtoincludeabduction/contact typeexperiencesasafourthcategory—CE-4.523A fifthcategoryCE-5hasalsobeen added,whichinvolves directcommunicationwithETraces.

According to Dr. StevenGreer, CE-5 cases involve either human or ET initiatedcommunication and interaction which distinguishes it from the first four categorieswhich areall ETinitiated.524In sum,thegrowthof human-ETinteractionsthatfall in theCE-3 to CE-5 range confirms whistleblower/witness testimonies that there is an ETinitiatedprogramof preparingthehumanpopulationforopeninteractionwithETraces.

FirstContactasaneventcomprisingthreeparts,hasbecomea long term processthatdependson public officialsinchargeofETaffairs agreeingon a strategyover how,when,orwhetherthisinformationshouldbe releasedto the generalpublic.However,ratherthanFirstContactbeingpurelya polit-icalprocessoutside the competence ofmost individuals to directly influence, it is also a social process whereby growingnumbersofindividualsare havingdirectinteractionwithETraces.

This indicates that First Contact involves both top-down political processes, andbottom-upsocialprocesseswhich areessential foritscompletion and futureopeninteractionbetweenhumanityandETraces.

Inthischapter,Iwillreviewthepoliticalandsocialprocessesthatcan leadtothecompletion of First Contact as a process that has lasted for almost 70 years. I willdescribethreescenariosthatwillbemostlikely tocompleteFirst Contact asa politicalprocess.I willthenanalyzeFirst Contactas a socialprocessthatfocusesonindividualsasagentsfor developing

278

CE-4 and/or CE-5 interactions with ETracesthatwillinevitablyimpacton FirstContactas a politicalprocess.

Indeed,itwill be argued thatFirstContactasasocialprocessinvolving individualinteractionwith ETracesisa nec-essaryconditionfor thecompletionofFirstContactasa politi-cal process.It willbeconcludedthatFirst Contactas a socialprocess has themost promising potential for bringing about full disclosure by public officials andtherebycompletingtheFirstContactprocess.First Contactas aPolitical ProcessThe mostcurrentphaseof First Contactas a politicalprocessoccurswhenresponsibleofficialsforET affairshaveencour-agedor madepossiblenon-officialrevelationsof anET presence and official government relations with ET races. These non-officialrevelationsareleakedtothegeneralpublic inawaythatconditionstheglobalpopulationtothepossibilityof FirstContactwhile simultaneously providing theoptionof plausibledeniability to government officials concerned over the consequences of full publicdisclosure.

First Contactas a politicalprocessis distinguishedby theneedfor thoseofficials inchargeof ETaffairs tomaintain tightcontrol over the release of ET information. Thusthereissomedegree oftoleranceforthe releaseofcertaincategoriesofinformationbyformerpublicofficials,andintoleranceforothercategories.Forexample,recenteffortsof President Clinton’s former chiefof staff, John Podesta, to promote disclosure,indicatetoleranceofsuchpubliceffortsbyformerofficialswho presumably havesomeinsideinformationontheETpresence.525

Col. Corso and numerous other former military/intelligence officials are similarlytoleratedintheir releaseofinformation.526

Evidenceof official intolerance arecircumstances surrounding the death of PhilSchneiderwho wenton thepubliccircuitin 1995withlectures onhis participationin theconstruction of underground military bases and the joint projects with ET races.Schneiderwas founddeadin January1996.Former

279

whistleblowers testify to the use of theprivatesecurityagency,Wackenhut,for theintimidation,silencingandevenmurderofpublicofficials, corporateemployeesand/orcivilian witnessesof ETrelated projectsor activities thatare notpartof theoffi-cialacclimationpolicy.527

Therearenumerousscenarioswhereby official disclosure of theETpresence couldoccur.Rather thanexaminean extensivelist of these scenariosandtheirnuances,I willconcentrate on those three that provide the basic contrasting models by which publicdisclosureismostlikelytooccur.

Evidence presented thus far in this book suggests that the debate among officialsresponsibleforETaffairs falls into polar- ized campswith contrasting views over theextensivepolitical, socialandeconomic ramificationsof completing First Contact as apolitical process. I now explore three contrasting scenarios or models by which FirstContact is most likely to be completed as a political process where there is officialdeclarationofanETpresence.

The firstscenarioinvolvesfulldisclosureof contactwith anETracehavingoccurredat a certain time, by the US and other governments in announcements to theirrespectivegeneralpublics.Thiswouldpresumablybefollowedbytheopenappearanceof theannouncedETraceandfullmediacoverageof theETpresence.Inthis scenario,theclandestinegovernmentorganizations responsible forcoordinating ETpolicy at thenationaland international levels (seeChapters Two and Three) have reached agreementover thebestsequencingof eventsinorder to familiarize thegeneralpublicwith theETpresence.

This scenario would presumably be based onwidespread cooperation betweenclandestinegovernment/militaryorgani-zationsandETracesthatfigureprominentlyin the publicacknowledgement of First Contact.At somepoint, therewould bea morecomplete disclosure of the historic relations between ET races and various nationalgovernments,andanefforttoaccountfor thehistoric non-disclosurepolicy thatkeptthisoutof thepublicarenaforso long.

The above scenario would be the most desirable means of completing the FirstContactprocess,sinceit involvesa highdegreeof agreementof all parties involved intheprocess,and

280

a sequencing of events thatbest preparesthegeneralpublicforfull disclosure. Due to the advanced nature ofET races in terms of theirculture,technologyandmentalabilities,itwould beexpectedthat acoordinatedeffort would berequiredto prepare the generalpublicwithminimaldisruptionsandanxiety.

It couldbeexpectedthatresourceswouldbe devotedtopreparingthegeneralpublicin termsof theuse ofmoviesandotherformsof entertainment. The2002 televisionminiseriesproducedby StevenSpielberg,Taken,couldwell bean exam-ple of thekindof initiative by clandestine organizations wishing to prepare the general public. Inaddition,theefforts offormerseniorpublicofficials suchas JohnPodestain advocatingdis- closure of information on ETs/UFOs provides another example of acclimationeffortsto bringaboutcompletionofthe FirstContactprocess.

Asecondand contrastingwayinwhich FirstContactwillbecompletedasapoliticalprocess is that there will be amass global intervention of an ET race that becomesknownworld-widethroughwidespreadmediareportsthatcannotbesuppressedordeniedby publicofficials.528Thesemasspublicsightingsandlandingswouldpredictablyculminatein officialrecognitionof the ETpresence,andlead to full disclosure of thehistoricdimensionsof theETpresenceandpriorgovern-mentalrelationswithETraces.

This scenario would presumably occur without clandestine government organizationsresponsibleforETaffairshavingreachedagreementtopermitsuch a massET intervention, but not being in a position to oppose such intervention.Presumably,an ET racemay havereached the conclusion thatelite policymakers areunnecessarily endangering the biosphere through a range of clandestine militaryprogramsand/ornotprotectingtheglobalecosystemin ways thatthreatentheinterestsofglobalhumanity.

Coverteffortstomilitarily preventsuchanopenETinter-ventionwouldmostlikelyhave been eitherattempted andexhausted, orrendered ineffectivebypreemptive ETmilitaryaction.Policy makersaftersuchaseriesof military setbacks,largelyunknowntothe generalpublic,wouldhavedecided

281

thatit iscounterproductiveto the interestsof thecivilianpop-ulation and the careers of the respective public officials dealing with ET affairs tocontinueovertmilitaryoperationsagainstpublicly visible ETcraft incivilianareas.

EvidencethatclandestineUS militaryorganizationshaveactivelytargeted ET craftinthe pastandcreated aglobaldefensiveshieldtoenhancethis offensiveability, indicatesthatcoverteffortsalreadyhavebeen activelytakento preventamassinterventionby anETrace.529

Themassblackoutthataffectedmuchofthe Northeastofthe UnitedStatesonAugust14, 2003, couldwell be an example of the type of preemptive ETmilitary action thatmight persuade clandestine organizations to accept the inevitability of mass ETintervention.Thecauseofthe blackoutaswellas themajorblackoutin 1965,hasbeenclaimedby sometobe relatedto ET activity.530Theblackoutmaymerelyhavebeen themost visible manifestation of a series of preemptive ET actions that affected localmilitaryinstallationsotherwiseusedto preventamassET interventionin the NortheastoftheUS.

This second scenario is clearly less desirable than the first, since it suggestsinstitutionalizedoppositiontofulldisclosureintheformofofficialsnot desiringtomoveforwardinacclimationefforts.Variouswhistleblowerstestifyto the oppositionofahardcore of individuals termed “the cabal,” who are opposed to genuine dialogue andcooperationwithETraces.531

Presumably,there is divisionin clandestineorganizationsoverthe pace andextentof official disclosure, andET racesmay simply decidetobringthemattertoa headbydeciding to move forward with amass intervention, forcibly removing those officialsand/ordestroyinganyweaponsinstallationsbeingusedtopreventamass intervention.Thisscenariowouldobviouslybeless controlledand predictableand would involvelessadequate preparation of the general public for official announcement of the ETpresence.

Apredictableendresultwouldbea processofpublicoffi-cialshavingto accountfortheirET relatedpolicieswhileinoffice. Theremay evenbespecialtribunalsconvenedforpub-lic/militaryofficials whowere mostaggressivein theircovert

282

operationsagainstET craft,and/orviolationsofciviliansinclandestineweaponsdevelopmentprojects.

Thethird andleastlikely scenariois a large-scalemilitaryconflictbetweenanETraceandclandestinegovernmentorganizationsthatcannotbe hiddenfromthe generalpublic. This would take on a characteristic of a “War of the Worlds” in which thepresence ofETs isofficiallydisclosed to the general public in terms of an ET racelaunching an invasion or attempted “takeover.” It has been revealed by military-intelligencewhistleblowers,thatthere hasbeen low intensityconflictbetweentheETraceknownas Grays/Zetasandclan-destinegovernmentorganizationsthatsometimes leadstothetargetingandshootingdownofGray ETcraft.

Michael Wolf, for example,argues thatagreements with ET races have often beenbroken by rogue elements in various clandestine organizations and resulted inunnecessary militaryconfrontation.532 The development of a global defensive shieldusing advanced weaponry based on scalar technology and other exotic weaponssystems, has given clandestine military organizations a degree of confidence thatnational governments have some system of defense in case relations with ET racesbecomeovertly hostile.

Presumably, the relationship between ET races and clandestine government arequitecomplexandsometimesdegen-erateinto hostileencounterswith theGrays that arekeptsecretfrom thegeneralpublic.

Someinsidersclaim thatan ETinvasionscenariocouldbeentirelycontrivedinorderfor themilitary-industrialcomplexintheUSand othercountriestogain greaterpowerandresourcesintheir respectivecountries.Dr.StevenGreer,forexample,hasstated:

Since1992 I haveseen this scriptunveiled to meby a tleast a dozen well-placedinsiders.Ofcourse,initiallyIlaughed,thinking this just tooabsurdand far-fetched...And yet otherstoldme explicitly thatthingsthatlookedlike UFOsbut thatare builtand under the control of deeply secretive “black” projects, were being used tosimulate—hoax—ET-appearingevents,includingsome

283

abductions and cattle mutilations,to sowtheearlyseeds of cultural fear regarding life in outer space.And that at some point afterglobalterrorism,eventswouldunfoldthatwouldutilizethenow-revealedAlienReproduction Vehicles (ARVs,or reversed-engineeredUFOs made by humans bystudyingactual ETcraft—see the bookDisclosure by the sameauthor) to hoax anattackon Earth.Like themovieIndependence Day, anattempt to unite the worldthroughmilitarismwouldunfoldusingETs asthe newcosmicscapegoat (thinkJewsduringtheThirdReich).533

Intheview of Dr.Greerandsomewhistleblowers/insiders,thewholephenomenonof

negativeET racesis contrivedbyclandestinemilitary/intelligenceorganizationsintheUSandelsewhere.AccordingtoCatherineFitts,formerDeputySecretary intheDepartment ofHousing and UrbanDevelopment, the military industrial complex in the US is eager to legalize its blackoperationsbudgetthatran for fiscal years1998,1999,2000 atapproximately3.3 trilliondollars (1.1trillionperyear).534

A threatened ET invasion would provide sufficient cover to rapidly expand the“official”defensebudget thatin the2003fiscal year was nearly380billion dollars,but“unofficially”wascloserto1.5 trilliondollarsifFitts estimatesareaccurateof theannualamountdisappearinginto theblack budget.535

There isalsothe viewthatan“invasion” or“takeover” involving the “Grays”couldbecontrivedby an ET racecom-monlydescribed asReptilians or Anunnaki, thatsecre t l yencourages a military conflict between national governments and theGrays/Zetas. The degree of infiltration by the Reptilian race in US based clandestineorganizations(seeChapterFour)makessuch a scenarioquitepossiblegivenevidenceofhostil-itybetweentheGraysandReptilians.536 Presumably, theReptilian/Anunnakiwouldinterveneashumanity’ssaviorsandstage a“false second coming” involvingabio-engineeredcloneof thehistoricalJesususingadvancedETtechnology.537

Thethree scenariosdescribed thus far mayoccur in thenot too distant future andinvolve politicaleventsandpolicies

284

outsidethe influenceofmostindividuals.There ishoweveranotherelementto the First Contactprocessthatdoes focusonindividuals.Thisisthethird part of the First Contact process—open interaction between ET races and thegeneralpublic.

Rather thansomethingthatisentirelydependenton publicdisclosure, suchinteractionis a socialprocess thatcanoccur independently andevenmoveahead of the politicalprocess.Thiswouldhappenwhenlargenumbersof individualsinteractwith ETracesandbegintoopenlyadvocate fulldisclosure in away thatcouldresult in a politicalprocesssimilar tothe1960scivilrightsmovementintheUS.

Fromtheavailableevidenceof thenumberof abduction/contactexperiences,itmaybeconcludedthatFirstContactasa socialprocesshasbeen adopted asa basicstrategybyETraces eager to have full disclosureof theirpresence madeknown to the generalpublic.

The thirdpartof theFirstContactoccursat the individuallevelwherebyanET raceactivelymakescontactwithlargenumbersofciviliansin aneffortto prepare themandmakethemcatalystsforofficialdisclosureandtransformationofhumansociety.Thishasanumberofimportantelementsthatrequire closeexamination,sinceit appearsthatthis has direct influence on full disclosure and the completion of First Contact as apoliticalprocess.First Contactas aSocial ProcessThere is extensive public information availableon individualswho have experienced directcontactwith ETraces.The mostwell knowndatabase of informationcomesfromthe works ofBuddHopkins,Dr. David JacobsandDr. JohnMack who, since the early1980s, have published scholarly articles, books and interviews on the experiences ofindividualstheydescribeas“abductees.”538

These pioneering researchers allused hypnosis for theretrieval ofmemories whichinmostcaseswereburiedinthe sub/unconsciousmindsof“abductees.” Theabductees

285

hadnoconsciousrecollectionofeventsotherthanavagueintuitionthatsomethinghad happenedtothem,and itprobablyinvolvedETs.539

Analysis of the information retrieved from these hypnosis sessions instantlyprovokedcontroversyoverits accuracyandreliability.David Jacobsnarrates his ownexperience in choos- ing to pursue this research contrary to the advice of those whobelievedscholarly eventsneededtofocus on thecollationandanalysis ofUFO sightings:

In 1981, Budd Hopkins published Missing Time . . . His book gave UFOresearchers the firstsystematiccomparison of abductee experiences andshowedthat the phenomenon could be studied on a society-wide basis . . . After mymeetingswithHopkins,Icalled[Dr.AllenHynek]and told him I thoughtHopkins was on tosomething important.Hynek warned me to stay away from the abduction cases because they wereeccentricandledus off themainpathof sightinganalysis.I dis-agreedandtoldhimthatIthoughtHopkins’researchseemed solid.Hynekreiteratedhis warning,tryingtosteermebackto the “correct”courseofresearch.Abductionreportswere toobizarrefor him; hecouldnot subjectthemtothekind ofscientific analysis that hecoulduse forsightingsreports.540

Nevertheless,duetothescholarlyeffortof thesepioneerstorefinetheirtechniquesto

eliminatedistortionandbiasandidentifysignificantpatternsandexperiences,importantinfor-mationbegantoemerge.

In the majority of cases, civilians had involuntarily undergone medically relatedproceduresfor a geneticprogramsponsoredby theGray ETrace.Justificationfor theseprograms provided by the Grays was that they claimed to be suffering genetic defi-ciencies which threatened their long-term survival. Much information emergedconcerningtheparticipationofabductedhumansin thecreationof a hybridhuman-ETrace that would presumably provide suitable physical vehicles for the con-sciousness/soulsof theGray ETrace.

286

TheGraysviewedhumanityastooprimitivebecauseit

used onlyasmallproportion of itsmental potential, butamixture of Gray/Humangenes couldleadto anevolutionaryleapthatwouldbenefitbothraces.

According to Dr. David Jacobs, the hybrid programs are clear evidence of anefarious agenda by ET races that threatens the sovereignty and independence ofhumanity.541

Other researchers, including Dr. Mack, disagree and view t h eabductions as aphenomenonthat ismultifacetedinitsscopeandoutcomes.Mack’sconclusionis thatthehuman-ETinteractionholdsmanybenefits for humanityasevidenced by the height-enedconsciousnessandmore socially aware activitiesof thosewhohaveparticipatedinsuchinteractions. Reflecting Mack’s approach, Dr. Richard Boylan advocates using lesspejorative terms for describing human-ET interactions, such as “contactees”for humanparticipantsand “Star Visitors”todescribeETraces.542

My own conclusion is that the Grays’ hybrid program is clearly influencing anevolutionaryleapin humanconscious-nessin which a greater proportionof humanityis being born with advanced psychic abilities. A number of authors describe thephenomenonofmany psychically giftedyoungsters,called“IndigoChildren,”“CrystalChildren,”or “StarChildren.”543

Thesegifted children, in mostcases, appear to havenoconnection to the Grays’hybridizationprogram.If so,thenitappearsthatan evolutionaryleapin humanevolutionis takingplace through what the famed biologist, Rupert Sheldrake, describes as aninterconnected“morphicresonance”field thatis responsiblefor evolutionaryadvancesin all species.544 TheGrays’ hybridizationexperiments area likelycatalyst for and/orcomplementto thisphenomenon,withoutnecessarilybeingrelated toall theinstancesofpsychically giftedindividuals.

Asmall numberof researchersarguethatmanypurportedET abductionsare infactconducted byclandestine militaryorganizations desiring to develop advanced mind-controlandgenetictechniqueson thecivilianpopulation,andwho wish toportraytheseasET-related abductions.Reportingonwitnesstestimonies,Dr.StevenGreerclaims:

Thoseinsidethemulti-million dollarabductionindustryhavefor yearstoldmeofsuppressed testimonyfrom

287

abducteeswho recall humanmilitaryoperativesrunningtheshow—essentiallycontrollingthe event.Dr. HelmutLammer and others havedocumentedthishideousabuseof civiliansby roguecovertoperations. And mostimportant,we haveinterviewedmilitary andcorporateinsiderswho havedescribedin excruciatingdetailhowthey have hoaxedthese“alien abductions”—andwhy.545

These MILABs (Military Abductions) may in fact be a clandestine effort to

replicatethe geneticexperimentsfirstpursuedbyGraysandotherET species,withoutmaking the general public aware of who is actually responsible. The experiences ofindividualswho haveparticipatedinprojectsbasedinBrookhavenandMontauk,confirmthat military clandestine organizations regularly use non-voluntary civilians in theirprojectsandabusetherightsof thesecivilians.

AccordingtoPrestonNichols,“roughly3/4or moreof all‘alienabductions’ areactuallybeingdonebygovernmentagencies—with no ‘alien’involvementatall.”546ManyoftheNaziscientistswhowerebroughtintotheUSunderOperation Paperclip were reported to be leading thesegenetic/mind controlexperimentsfor USmilitary/intelligenceorganizations.

The most infamousof theseinvolvedprojectsMKUltra andMonarch. “Manchuriancandidates” were created thatwould perform tasks ranging from assassination to“suicidebomb-ings”as a resultof theadvancedmind controltechniques.547

Despite evidence ofmilitarycontrived ET “abductions,”most evidence on theabductionphenomenonconfirmsthatlarge numbersofindividualshavehadcontactwithETraces,buthold littleconscious recollection of these. Theuse of hypnosis andothertechniquesaresuccessfulinmany casesforbringingtheseinteractions totheactiveor awaremind stateasdemonstratedinthe pioneeringworkofBudd Hopkins,DavidJacobs,JohnMack andothers.548

Giventhesheernumberof cases,estimatedto be in themillions in theUS alone,itisworthexploringhowindividualscanbetterprepare forCE-4and/orCE-5interactionswithET racesandprovidepositivemodelsfor howthese experi-encescan bebeneficial.

288

Human-Extraterrestrial InteractionandPreparingfor First Contact

Animportantpreliminary forunderstandinghuman-ET interactionin theCE-4 and/orCE-5 rangeof Hynek’s classificationsystem,isdiscussionofdifferentbrain wave frequenciesand the partition of the human mind into three parts—conscious, subconscious andunconscious.

Thesebrain wave statesoperate atdifferentfrequenciesandtriggerdifferentpartsof themind tobecome dominant.549 This is significant since, when interactionwith ET racesoccurs, evidence suggests if it is sufficiently intense, it triggers different brain wavefrequencies.Thisaccountsforthedream-likequality or“alternativerealities”that oftenfigureinreportsofencounterswithETraces.

Four distinct frequency ranges for the human brain correspond to variousmental/emotionalactivities thebrain performs.The Beta brain wave rangeis15–40 Hz(cycles persecond)andcorresponds to the active fully conscious state of mind, e.g.,whenindividualsare activelyengaged in theirwork,havingadebate,giving a lecture,etc.

TheAlphabrainwaverangeis 9–14Hz andoccurswhenindividualsare in a relaxedyetfully consciousstate of mind,e.g., listeningtomusic,meditating,takinga walk in agarden,etc. In bothbeta andalphabrainwavestates, individualsare fully conscious andtypically havecompletememoriesofactiv-ities they perform.

The Thetabrain wave range is5–8 Hzandoccurswhen indi-viduals are in a deeptrance-likemeditation,day dreaming,or ahaving a light sleep.Atypical examplewouldbewhen individu-alsare drivingona familiarhighway and enter into a deeplyrelaxedstatewherethey simply forgetthey aredriving alongdif- ferent sections of thehighway.Individuals areprimarily operatingfrom thesubconscious part of themind that is filledwithpsychicenergiesthatarenot readily availabletotheconsciousmind.

SigmundFreudpioneered the studyof this portionof themindandthe roleplayedbyrepressed psychicenergies suchasdesire, anger, fear,memories, etc., in influencinghumanbehavior.550Experiencesin this brainwave statetypically have

289

adream-likequality tothemand canquicklybeforgotten,as inthecaseofdreams.

TheDeltabrainwaverangeis from1.5–4Hz, andoccurswhenin a deep sleep.In thisstate,the individualis usingtheunconsciouspart of themind wherearchetypal imagesarestored.Thepsychologistwhodidmostwork in uncoveringarchetypalpatternsthatinfluencehumanbehaviorwasCarlJung.551

Jung analyzed the UFOphenomenon and connected itwith archetypal patternsembedded in the human unconscious, thereby lending support to the view that UFOexperiences occur whenDelta brain waves are stimulated.552 In Delta state, one losesconsciousness of what is occurring around them and there is no memory of activitiesperformed.

Althoughoneormoreofthesebrain wave statescan occursimultaneously,normallyone state is dominant at any time. According to authors/contactees such as LyssaRoyal, ET races typically operate at the Theta and Delta brain wave states as theirequivalentof the wakingstate,only rarelyat the alpha,andeven less rarely at thebetabrain wave states.553

In contrast, the dominant brainwave states for humans in thewaking state are thehigher frequency beta and alpha brainwave states. Indeed, the frenetic pace and stressassociated with Western post-industrialized societies typically encourages beta brainwave states.

Testimonies of“abductees/contactees” suggest that ETs have very powerfulmentalabilities that they typically use totele-pathicallycommunicate, interactwith andeven control humansubjects. The hypnotic-like mind rapport that abductees/contactees often report when interacting with ETs suggests that the human brain hasshifted into the Theta/Delta brain wave ranges. This makes individuals more easilyinfluenced by ETcom-mands because when these brain waves become dominant forhumans, there is a shift into the non-waking states associated with thesubconscious/unconsciousportionsofthemind.

The lack of pain abducteesreportwhen medical procedures are performed withoutany anesthesia, suggests the ability ofETs to induceTheta/Delta brain wave states atwill.

EvidencesuggeststhatET racesoperate at lowerbrain-wavefrequenciesthatcanbe bothpowerfulandfocused

290

enough to influence even the mostresilientofabductees/contactees once a mental link has been established in a CE-4 or CE-5 encounter.Testimoniesdescribethegreatdifficulty inconsciouslyresistingthe hypnoticinfluenceofsomeETracesthatrenderonereceptivetoETcommands.

This would account for the dream-like interaction that many witness testimonies provideconcerningtheirET encounters.Putsimply,wheninteractingwith humans, themorepowerfulandfocusedmentalabilitiesof theETsandtheir low frequencybrainwavestatesappear to shift humansintothe brainwavestatesthatare typicallynotpartof one’snormal waking consciousness. This makes it difficult for humans to consciouslyrecollectwhat has occurred.

Notsurprisingly,individualsmightrationalizean actualETinteraction(eithera CE-4and/or CE-5) as a “daydream” evenwhen tell-tale physical signs (CE-2) might exist.Since there is no conscious recollection of an ET contact to support subcon-scious/unconscious feelingsandphysical evidence thatcontacthas occurred, “cognitivedissonance” sets in anddismisses the reality of the interaction. The result is that manyindividualsmayhaveexperiencedFirstContact!

However, theyhavenoconscious recollection of thecontactexperience, sincetheir consciousmind goes to sleep or enters a trance-like state; and upon enteringnormalwaking consciousness in the Beta-Alpha brain wave states, the experience isrationalized as a (day)dream and quickly forgotten. This means that any significantmessages communicated through the CE-4 and/or CE-5 contact experience are notabsorbedby theconsciousmind, and simply move into thesub/unconsciouspartsof themind for integration.

Thishelpsexplainthephenomenonof“missingtime”andwhyhypnosisisregularlyused as a means of recallingsub/unconscious memories of what had in factoccurred asareallife event.554In aneventthatillustrateshowinteractionbetweenanETraceandhumanmightoccur,LyssaRoyalrecountsthefollowing:

Janicewassittingat herdesk.As the Pleiadian[ET]approachedher, theenergyfield of theEThit her first.

291

So even before she looked up, shesensedtheenergy.Uponsensingthatenergy,herbrain-wavestatebeganto shift.Janicelookedup,notbecause sheheard asoundbut because she suddenlyfelt verydisoriented asherbrainwavesshifted veryrapidly. The first image Janice saw when she looked upwas thatofahumanoid(theactual femalePleiadian) dressedinaman’sbusinesssuit.This was an incongruous vision. We’re not talking about a feminine-styled businesssuitthatfemaleexecutiveswear.Instead, thiswasastraight, boxybusinesssuit thatwas obviouslytoobigfor thefemalePleiadian.

This incongruous imagewas the only way thatJanicecould make sense of whatwascomingtowardher. OnceJanice’sego registered the strangenessof the experi-ence, her consciousness entered what we would call dreamtime—theta consciousness. Her egowas no longer in control. This does not mean that theinteractionitselfwas a dream, no.The interaction itself simplydidnotadhere tothe rulesof yourphysicalreality,whichareorganizedby theego.The egowas nottheorchestratorofthis experience,so therules changed.555

IfFirstContactisaphenomenonthat has occurredformanymore individualsthanis

commonlyappreciated(someabduc-tion/contactestimatesareinthemillions for theUSalone), then this adds a new dimension to thewholeFirst Contact process. Rather thanFirstContactbeingsolely a matterof fullgovern-mentdisclosureofthe ET presence,First Contact requires a degree of preparation of the human population for anencounter (either a CE-4 or a CE-5) that typically shifts oneintoanalternative realityframework.Sucha“realityshift”makesconsciousrecall of theETexperiencedifficult.

Thus, “missingtime”or “dreamlike”recollectionsof actualphysicaleventsmay infact signifyan actualETinteractionthattheconsciousmind has rationalizedas a dream.

If ET-human interaction occurs far more often than com-monly accepted, thenofficialnon-disclosureto the general

292

public of FirstContact parallels non-recollectionofFirstContactby largenumbersof individuals.If there is somekindofsymbioticrelationshipbetweenFirstContact at the masspublicandprivate individual levels, then it mightbepredictedthatas moreindividualsbecomeawareof FirstContactexperi-ences, thiswillhaveanimpactonofficial disclosure ofFirstContact.Inshort, themoreindividualswhoconsciouslypreparethemselvesto eitherexperienceor remembera First Contactevent(CE-4orCE-5),thesoonerwillofficialpublic disclosureoftheETpresenceoccur.

Telepathiccommunicationand physical interactionwithETsinvolves somedegreeofmental/emotional rapport thatwouldordinarilyputahuman intoa trance/dream likestate (thetaanddeltabrainwavesstates)thatmightmakeinteractiondifficult to recallfor theconsciousmindafterthe interaction.Consequently,preparationfor First Contactinevitablyinvolvessomedegree of trainingwhereby individualscanconsciouslyoperateatlower brain wave frequenciesthat would occur when interaction(eitherCE-4 and/orCE-5)withETracesbegins.Official AttemptsatCommunicationwithExtraterrestrialRacesAccordingtowhistleblowerandabduction/contacteetesti-monies,there are twomainformsof communicationwith ETraces.The first isa purelycognitiveprocess,a directexchangeofthoughts—telepathy—whichconsistseitherof a voice beingdistinctlyheardinsidethehead,or holographicvisual imagesappearingagaininsidethehead.

Such communication involvessomecombination of purelymental energies andstimulation either of the visual cortex and/or the auditory senses without externalphysicalsourcescausingthese sensations.This is the typeofcommunicationmost oftendescribed as occurringwith theGray ETspeciesand appears tobe a cognitive processdevoidofemotionalcontent.ThereiswidespreadagreementamongresearchersthattheGrays do not display emotions, and even lack emotional bodies, thereby makingtelepathiccommunicationpurelyamentalexchangeof information.

293

Thesecondformofcommunicationinvolvesdirect

exchangeofinformation throughemotions. Anempathicconnection isestablishedallowing emotions tobefelt, inwhich a “gestalt-like knowing” occurs. This “gestalt-likeknowing”(intuition)is apparentlythe sameway thatcetaceanssuchaswhalesanddolphinscommunicatewith humans.

Accordingto JoanOcean,whohas researched cetaceancommunication since theearly 1980s,empathic communicationworks primarily at a cellular level556 rather thancognitive level, where emotions are exchanged in ways that facilitate deeplytransformativeexperiencessimilartomysticalstatesofconsciousness.557

Thosewhohavecommunicated with ETs in this empathicmanner typically reportwave-like feelings emanating from ETs that induce various emotional states thatfacilitate both a telepathic communication andagestalt knowing. It appears that theempathic communication uses intuition as the basis for the cellular and cognitiveexchangeof information.Thisform ofcommunication is typically associated withETsthathavereachedhigherevolutionarypotentialsthantheGray race.

Of the two forms of possiblecommunication with ETraces, there is evidence thatofficiallysponsored communicationwithETraces focusesexclusively on thefirst form.Confirmation that telepathy is indeed the dominant communication model with ETscomesfromthe official useof psychicswhogo through a rigorous training process fortelepathiccommunicationwithETs.Dan Shermanservedfor12 years in theUSAirforceandclaimsto haveparticipatedin ProjectPreserveDestiny,atop secretNationalSecurityAgency program in the 1960s that used psychics for telepathic communication withdifferentETraces.

Inhis book,AboveBlack, Shermandescribesthe processwherebyhewasrecruitedintothe programthroughofficialsidentifyinghis psychicabilitiesat ayoungage.558Hearguesthatsuchpotential recruitsare “programmed” inways thatmake themloyal toauthorityfiguresandsusceptibletorecruit-mentinto themilitary.

Theprogramming of psychicsat ayoungage appears tohave beena part of theinfamousMKUltraand MonarchProjectsthatusedmindcontrolprogrammingon childrentypically fromtheagesof10–16. “MrCoffee,”ananonymouspsychic recruited

294

into oneoftheseprograms,arguesthat hewassentthreelettersofacceptancefromtheWestPointMilitaryAcademyandAnnapolisNaval Academyeventhoughhe appliedtoneither.

Heargues thatwhatmade himthe subject of thisveryunusual treatment were hisadvancedpsychicabilitiesandtheeagernessof his “handlers” tohave him enlist in themilitarysohis abilitiescouldbefullyexploited.559Dr.MichaelWolf, whoclaims tohaveworkedin theNationalSecurityAgency,claimshepioneereda “mental enhancement” processwhich “allowsutilizationofavastly-increasedpercentageofthe brain,inorderforhumanstomentallyengagetheextraterrestrialsinfulltelepathicmentalexchange.”560

ThetestimonyofShermanandotherssuggeststhatclandestineorganizationsusepsychicsin theircommunicationwithETsforthree mainreasons:first,to establishadirect form of communication with ET races whereby the regular exchange of information can take place between seniorofficials/policy makers andET races;second, to learnmore about ET races that use telepathic and empathic thought/emotionalexchangesas their dominantmodesof communication;and third, psychicsactas a filter allowinga more tightlymanagedflowofinformationbetweenETsandseniorofficials/policymakers.

This filtering process guards against senior officials and policy makers beingexposed to subtle formsof manipulation byET races in the communication process,which mightcompro-misethepolicymakingprocess.AccordingtoJamissonNeruda,someETracesuse“suggestivetelepathy”thatsubtlyallows ET’stomanipulatehumans:

TheGrays, andmost extraterrestrials for thatmatter, communicate with humansexclusively throughaformoftelepathy,whichwecalledsuggestivetelepathybecausetous itseemedthattheGrays communicatedinasuch awaythat they weretrying toleada conversa-tion toa particularend. Inotherwords, they always hadan agenda, and we werenever certain ifwe were a pawn of their agenda or wearrivedatconclusionsthatwereindeedour own.561

295

Theuse oftelepathiccommunicationwithETraces suggests

thatpsychicsare trained to enter and operate consciously in the theta/delta brainwavestatesnecessaryforthisformofinteractionwithETraces.

Therearetwosignificantconsequenceofthefilteringprocessof usingpsychicsfordirectcommunicationwith ETs.The firstisthatseniorofficialsandpolicy makersdonotestab-lishdirecttelepathiccommunicationwithETraces,and arethusshieldedfromCE-5 experiences. Such direct communicationwould presumably expose these officials to“suggestivetelepa-thy,”therebycompromisingthe policymakingprocess,andpossiblyleadingto “compromisedofficials”beingexcludedfrom thechain ofcommand.

Asecondconsequenceisthatseniorofficialsdonot appar-entlytrainthemselvestodirectly communicate with ET races. This means that such officials are not trained tooperatein thethetaanddeltabrain wave statesintheordinarywaking states, from whichthey would beabletoaccesshigherorderpersonalabilitiesandknowledge.

Although the purely cognitive telepathic communication process involvesaccessing higher level mental abilities, it appears that theempathic communicationprocess iswhat facilitates the highestorderof personal abilities through the cellu- lartransmission of emotions and the “gestalt knowing” or intuition that occurs. Theconclusion that emerges is that those officials most responsible for deciding theappropriatenationalpoliciesfor respondingto theETpresence,are paradoxicallykeptfrom developing higher level abilities that might assist them in the policy makingprocess.

President Eisenhower’s concern that ET affairswere “not going to be in the besthands”mayunfortunatelyhavebeeninstitutionalizedbythe verypeoplemostresponsiblefor thepolicy makingprocess.562Non-officialCommunicationwith ETRacesInadditiontothe“officialcommunication”withETracesthatoccursbutisnotdisclosedtothegeneralpublic,there is

296

non-official communication with ETraces.Suchnon-officialcommunicationhasoccurredfromthe beginning ofhumancivilization, and involvedboth the telepathic exchange of information and the empathic communication throughtheexchangeofemotions.

Sinceantiquity,individualshaveclaimedto be indirectcommunication with God,angels,gods,extraterrestrials,etc.563One need only look at the founding texts of the Old Testament and the Koran forprominentexamplesofthispowerfulcommu-nicationwhichprofoundlyinfluencedthedevelopmentofhumansocieties.

Many individualswho claim tohavesuccessfullycommuni-cated in thisway,havehistoricallydevelopedmethods forteachingothershowto similarly communicate. Manyoftheancient“mysteryschools”pioneeredtelepathic/empathiccommunicationas evidencedby individualsand groupssuch asMadamBlavatsky and the TheosophicalSociety,Nazi GermanOccultsocietiesVrill andThule, andthemorerecentphenom-enonof“channeling.”564

Numerouschannelsclaim tobe in communicationwith ETraces in termsof CE-5experiences. Many of these channels provide extensive information on ET races,distinguishedbytheirclarity,coherenceandphilosophicaldepth. Thismakesitdifficultto dismiss such communication as contrived, fictitious or part of a government disinformation campaign. It appears that the training thatchannels use in developing their “lines of communication” with ET races typically involves important lifestylechanges such as meditation, dietary changes, alterna-tive health practices, andestablishingharmonioussocialrelationships.

Although there is great variety and intensity in these informal trainings that“channels”undergo, it appearsthatthecommonthemeisthatsomerigorous lifestylechanges are necessary for establishing direct communication with ET races. SomeET/UFO researchers such asDr. Greer and Lyssa Royal facilitate ongoing weeklongworkshopsin whichparticipantsaretrainedtohaveCE-5experiences.565

AthemethatiscommoninsuchtrainingsandalsointheworldwidephenomenonofCropCirclesistheroleof

297

“sacredgeometry.”Sacredgeometryistheview,firstpromotedby theancientGreeks,thatthecreationof theuniversecan bereducedto acore groupofgeometrical patterns called the “Platonic solids.” With the growth in Crop Circlesaroundtheplanetand theunmistakablerole ofgeometricalpatterns in theirdesign, it isworth exploring in somedetailhow sacred geometry may play a role in stimulatinghigherconsciousness states(thetaanddelta brainwaves) thatariseduringCE-4orCE-5experiences.566 Thiswill be done without entering into thecontinuing debate overCrop CirclesasphysicalevidenceofCE-2visitations.SacredGeometryandFirst ContactAbovetheentrancetoPlato’sAcademyinancientGreecewasaninscriptionthatread,“Letno one destitute of geometry enter my doors.” Plato viewed the contemplation ofgeometry as the essential requirement for training individuals to discover the deepestphilosophical truths. Indeed, Plato was part of a tradition that stretched back to thephilosopher Pythagoras and even further back to ancient Egypt and the mysteriousbuildersof theGreatPyramidofGiza.

This ancient “sacred geometry” tradition is exemplified in the current age byprominent authorssuchasBuckminsterFullerandmore generally the Freemasonry movementthatbelievesthemostdurableandharmoniousarchitecturaldesignsarebasedon key geometricalpatternsandratios.567

TheprincipalgeometricalshapesarethefivePlatonicsolids thatsharea numberofcharacteristics.Each issymmetri-cal in termsof thenumberof faces,anglesandsides,andtheyfitperfectlyinsidea sphere.

TheGreeks assigned to each of the Platonic solidswhat they believed to be theessentialelementsofthe universe:Earth,Water,Fire,AirandEther/Universe.568The fivePlatonicsolidsare the Tetrahedron(four triangularfaces—fire);Cube(foursquarefaces—earth); Octahedron (eight triangular faces— air); Dodecahedron (twelvepentagonalfaces—ether)andIcosahedron(20triangularfaces—water).

298

It was no accident that the medievalidealforthe ideal

humanproportionswerebasedon thewritings ofan architect.The Roman architect/engineer, Vitruvius Pollio wrote his famous treatise on

Architecture in the First century BC.569 His belief that the human body had idealproportions thatprovided the standard forarchitectural design waswidely adopted bymedievalartistsandarchitectsinEurope.What madeVitruvius’work especiallypopular was his beliefthatthese idealpropor-tionswere related to a circle andsquare, the two-dimensionalrepresentationsofthekeyPlatonic solids—thesphereand cube:

. . . ifa manbe placedflat on his back,with his handsand feet extended, and apair ofcompassescenteredathisnavel ...thefingersandtoesofhis two handsandfeetwilltouchthe circumferenceof a circle describedtherefrom. And just as thehumanbodyyields a circularoutline,so tooa square figuremay befoundfrom it.Forifwe measurethe distancefromthesolesof the feettothetopof thehead,andthenapply thatmeasureto the outstretchedarms, the breadthwillbe found tobe thesameas theheight...570

Vitruvius’workespeciallyinfluencedLeonardo DaVinci,whowasintriguedbyhow

sacred geometry was related to understanding the human body. His famous drawing o fVitruvianMan [See fig. 1]isstillusedas the standard for drawing humanproportionsinmodernart.

Figure1—Da Vinci’sVitruvianManIntheearly1970s,Drunvalo Melchizedekclaimedtohave beentelepathicallycontactedbytheancientEgyptianteacher,Thoth,andinstructedto studyandeventuallyteachsacredgeometryanditsrelationshipwithlifeandthe elevationofhumanconsciousness.

Melchizedek subsequently developed an elaborate training method based on thesacred geometrical design of “golden mean spiral” that governs the evolution of lifeflowing throughthe entire universe.Hecalledhispioneeringtechniquethe

299

Fig. 1Da Vinci’sVitruvianMan“FlowerofLife”anditsubsequentlyattractedworldwideattentionthroughhisbooksandvideos.571

WhatappealedtomanyinMelchizedek’sworkwashisability toanalyzeinnovationsina numberof scientific disciplines in termsof sacred geometry andcombine thiswithadeeplyrewarding meditative practice. Those who participated in hi spioneering workshop programs subsequently producedremarkable innovations in theirrespective disciplines, suggesting that the exposure to sacred geometry was indeed acatalystforaccessinghigherstatesofconsciousness.

His workshop programs have since been extended to include telepathic/empathic communicationwithcetaceans,suggesting

300

thattrainingin sacredgeometryis thekeytounlockingthesehigherordercommunicativeabilitiesinhumans.572

In sum, the development of abilities that facilitate communication with ETraces(CE-5experiences)aredirectly stimulatedbygeometricalconfigurationsthatarefoundin“sacredgeometry.”Thefact thatsacred geometryfigures prominentlyin the CropCirclephenomenongives supporttoviews thatitisaform ofETinspired communicationwithhumanity.Developingabilitiesofbeingfullyconsciouswhenexperiencingtheta/deltabrainwavestatesis therefore aided byawareness andunderstanding ofsacredgeometricalstructures.

In addition to the role of “sacred geometry” in facilitating higher states ofconsciousnessfor individuals,is its role in the importantwork beingconducted on thelocationofsacredsitesaroundtheplanet.It is claimedthatlocationof sacred sites,manyofwhich areWorld Heritage listed, fallalonga numberof concentric circulararcs thatformamultidimensionalenergygrid aroundtheplanet.573

Thissuggeststhatsacred geometryisalsoapartoftheenergysystemthatsustainssacredsitesaroundtheplanet;siteswhichhavetraditionallyfacilitatedhigherstateso fconsciousness. The city of Delphi in ancient Greece, for example, was a sacred sitebecauseof itspositionon this multidimensionalgridsystemand the ability for residentpriests/priestessestospontaneouslyexperiencehigherstatesofconsciousness.

Sacredgeometry therefore appears to be an importantmeans of facilitating thebrain wave states associated with higher states of consciousness in which CE-5experiencesoccur. Developingan awarenessofsacredgeometrical patterns thatexist inthe genesis of life, crop circles, structures like the pyramids, the human body and theearthitself, can thereforebe concluded to stimulate the higherdimensional conscious-nessrequiredfor“First Contact.”CompletingtheFirst ContactProcessFirstcontacthas thusfarbeendescribedas a processthathasyettobecompletedduetotheabsenceofanofficial

301

announcementtotheglobalgeneralpublicoftheETpresence.In the absenceof suchanannouncement,First Contactasasocialprocessgainsmoreprominencesinceiteffectivelybecomestheonly way inwhich theETpresencecanbecon- firmedand the contact process completed in a way thathassocial and politicalsignificance.

As more individualslearnaboutanddevelop the abilitieswhereby they can establishcommunicationwithETraces throughCE-5experiences,thiscompletestheFirstContactprocessfor largersegmentsof humansociety.Such a social processwillinevitablyhaveanimpactonthe largerpoliticalprocessthatwillat sometimeculminatein the First Contactprocessbeingcompletedattheofficiallevel.

This suggeststhatratherthanpassivelywaitingfor officialannouncementof theETpresence or desperately struggling for public disclosure, individuals exploreconsciousnessraisingtechniquesand/orlifestylechangesthatwouldmakethemmorereceptivetothetelepathic/empathicforms of communi-cationusedby ETs.

Most important, developing the ability to remain in the waking state whileaccessingtheta/delta brainwavestatesappearsto be criticalsincethisappearsto bewhenFirstContact(CE-4or CE-5experiences)occursfor individuals.

Asa politicalprocess,First Contactrequires fulldisclosureof theETpresence,andlies outside the abilities of most individuals to appreciably influence. However as asocialprocess,FirstContactrequiresmoreindividualsmakingthemselves receptive tofully conscious interaction with ET races either through a direct form oftelepathic/empathiccommunication(CE-5)and/orphysicalinteraction(CE-4).

Ifthereisindeedaweb of“morphicenergy”that isrespon-sible for speciesdiversityand evolutionas thebiologist,RupertSheldrakesuggests, then CE-5experiences canbecome so common, a policy of non-disclosure of the ET presence will becomeimpossibletomaintain.574

Officialpolicy ofnon-disclosureoftheETpresencehas beeninexistencefor close toseventyyears and has createdan inertiathathassofar proventobe insurmountable forpolicymakersopposedtonon-disclosure.AsuccessionofUSPresidents,

302

seniorpublicofficials,enlightened policymakers,membersoftheUSCongress,andconcernedprivatecitizens,haveallattempted andfailed to forcepublicdisclosure. This hashadtremendouspolitical implicationsfortheUSand allworldnations.

Ratherthannon-disclosurebeingabad policydecisionimposedbyunenlightenedpublic officials on an ignorant public, non-disclosure is the inevitable policyconsequenceofan unpreparedhumanityforthetruth oftheETpresence.Eachindividualhas thepower to change this, and through their pri-vate efforts contribute tobringingaboutanofficialdisclosureoftheETpresence.

ANewWorldof profoundpotentialawaitshumanityifwearepreparedfor it!Notes

516.Iwouldliketo especiallythankArtMillerforhiskindnessandhospitalityin providingmewith living andresearchfacilitieswhileIcompletedthischapter.Thanksalsoto NavinKulshreshtraforhelpingto arrangeformystayandprovidingapositiveresearchenvironment.517.Forreferences to suchmeetings, see Branton,TheOmega Files;Secret NaziUFOBasesRevealed (InnerLightPublications,2000).Available onlineat: think-about-it.com.

518.For discussionof this treaty,seeChapterTwo.519.For a comprehensivediscussionof theseeffortssee RichardDolan,

UFOs andtheNationalSecurity State(HamptonRoads,2002).520.See StevenGreer,Disclosure(CrossingPoint Inc.,2002).

521.SeeRichardBoylan,“Aviary,Good-Bye;Hello,AcclimationProgram,”inBoylanandBoylan,LaboredJourneyTo TheStars.Available onlineat: http://www.drboylan.com/aclmatn2.html.522.AllenHynek,TheUFOExperience:AScientificStudy(NTC/ContemporaryPublishing;1972).

523.SeeC.D.B.Bryan,CloseEncountersofTheFourthKind:AlienAbduction,UFOs, andtheConferenceatM.I.T.(AlfredKnopf, 1995).524.StevenGreeristheDirectoroftheCE-5initiative throughtheCenterfor theStudy of Extraterrestrial Intelligence(CSETI).Furtherinforma-tion availableonlineat: http://www.cseti.org/ce5.htm.525.RichardStenger,“Clintonaideslams Pentagon’sUFOsecrecy,”CNN(October22,2002). Availableonlineat:http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/10/22/ufo.records/index.html.

303


http://www.cseti.org/ce5.htm

http://www.cnn.com/2002/

526.See Corso,The DayAfter Roswell (Pocket Books,1997).

527.See RichardBoylan, “DialoguewithColonelSteve Wilson,” inBoylanandBoylan,LaboredJourneyToTheStars. Available online at:

http://www.drboylan.com/colww3a.html://www.drboylan.com/colww3a.html.528.Forthe historicmanipulationof mediacoverageof ET/UFOs,see

TerryHansen,Missing Times (XlibrisCorporation,2001).529.See Corso,The DayAfter Roswell. See also RichardBoylan, “ColonelSteveWilson, USAF(ret.) RevealsUFO-oriented Project Pounce,” in Boylan and Boylan, Labored Journey To The Stars. Available online at:http://drboylan.com/swilson2.html.

530.SiriAgrell, “UFOs blamedforoutagein1965” NationalPost, August18,2003.Availableonlineat:http://www.nationalpost.com/home/story.html?id=728B9A46-EE55-4BBE-AB8B-945F29B31D58.531.Richard Boylan,“QuotationsfromChairmanWolf,”in BoylanandBoylan,LaboredJourneyToTheStars.Availableonlineat:http://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html.532.Richard Boylan,“QuotationsfromChairmanWolf,”in BoylanandBoylan,LaboredJourneyToTheStars.Availableonlineat:http://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html.

533.StevenGreer,CosmicDeception:Let theCitizen Beward(DisclosureProject,2002).Available onlineat: http://www.disclosureproject.org.534.CatherineAustin Fitts, “The $64Question:What’s UpWith theBlackBudget?—TheRealDeal,”Scoop:UQWire(23 September,2002).Availableonlineat:http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0209/S00126.htm.535.For an investigativereporton the1.1 trillion thatannually goesmiss- ing fromDOD and other government agency budgets, see Kelly Patricia O’Meara, “Wasted Riches” Insight Magazine (Sept. 28, 2001). Availableonlineat:http://www.insightmag.com/main.cfm/include/detail/storyid/108588.html.

536.CourtneyBrowndiscussessuchconflictinhisdiscussionofthe“ReptilianAgenda”in CosmicExplorers(SignetBook, 2000) pages297–320.

537.SeeStewartSwerdlow,Montauk:The Alien Connection(SkyBooks,1998). For online discussion of this scenario, see Michael Salla, “Preserving Human Sovereignty andIndependence In Responding to Extraterrestrial Intervention,” (Exopolitics.org 5/5/2003). Available at:http://exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-6.htm.538.SeeBuddHopkins,Missing Times (BallantineBooks,1990); Jacobs,SecretLife: FirsthandAccountsofUFOAbductions (Touchstone Books, 1993); John Mack, Abduction: Human Encounters with Aliens (New York:BallantineBooks,1994);andMack,PassporttotheCosmos:HumanTransformationandAlien Encounters(ThreeRiversPress, 2000).

304

http://www.drboylan.com/colww3a.html

http://drboylan.com/swilson2.html

http://www.nationalpost.com/home/



http://www.disclosureproject.org

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0209/

http://www.insightmag.com/main.cfm/

http://exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-6.htm

539.For detaileddiscussionof the useof hypnosisinabductioncases,

seeBuddHopkins,“HypnosisandtheInvestigationofUFOAbduction,”UFOs&Abductions:ChallengingtheBordersofKnowledge,ed.,DavidJacobs(UniversityofKansasPress,2000)pages215–40.

540.David Jacobs,The Threat(Simon andShuster,1998)pages17–18.541.Jacobs,The Threat.

542.Richard BoylanandLeeBoylan,Close Extraterrestrial Encounters: Positive Experiences With MysteriousVisitors(WildflowerPress,1994); andRichard Boylan& LeeBoylan,Labored Journey To The Stars (2003):www.drboylan.com. See LeeCarroll andJanTober,TheIndigoChildren:TheNewKidsHaveArrived(Hay House, 1999);DoreenVirtue, TheCrystalChildren:AGuidetotheNewestGeneration ofPsychicandSensitiveChildren(Hay House, 2003).Seealso Paula Peterson’sinterview ofRichardBoylan, “Star Kids:Our FutureHope,” (February, 2003)Availableonlineat:http://www.drboylan.com/strkidsfuture.html.

543.RupertSheldrake,ANew ScienceofLife(InnerTraditionsIntl.,1995).544.StevenGreer,“Decoy,Distract and Trash,” (DisclosureProject,2002).

Available onlineat: http://www.disclosureproject.org/ddt.htm.545.Quoted in JohnQuinn, “PhoenixUndead: The Montauk Project andCamp Hero Today,” (NewsHawk Inc,1998).Availableonlineat:http://vs03.tvsecure.com/~vs030f1/monew.htm.546.SeeRonPatton, “Project Monarch: NaziMind,”TheConspiracyReader:Fromthe Deaths of JFK and JohnLennontoGovernment-Sponsored Alien Cover-Ups, eds., Al Hidell& JoanD’Arc (Citadel Press, 1999) 197–213.Availableonlineat:http://www.aches-mc.org/monarch.html.

547.SeeHopkins,MissingTimes;Jacobs,SecretLife;andMack,Abduction.548.For a discussionof brainwavesandthe differentmental/emotionalactivitiesassociated withthese, seeAnnaWise,TheHigh-PerformanceMind:MasteringBrainwavesfor Insight,Healing,andCreativity(J.P.Tarcher,1997); andElmerGreen andAlyceGreen,BeyondBiofeedback(DelacortePress, 1977).

549.SeeSigmundFreud,IntroductoryLecturesonPsychoanalysis(Liveright,1989).550.CarlJung,TheArchetypesandTheCollectiveUnconscious—CollectedWorksofC.G.JungVol.9Part1(PrincetonUniversityPress, 1989).

551.CarlJung,FlyingSaucers: AModernMythofThings Seen intheSkies(PrincetonUniversityPress, 1979).

552.See LyssaRoyal,PreparingforContact.553.See Hopkins,Missing Times.

305


http://www.disclosureproject.org/ddt.htm


http://www.aches-mc

554.LyssaRoyalandKeith Priest,Preparingfor Contact:Metamorphosisof Consciousness(RoyalPriest ResearchPress, 1993)p. 83.555. For discussion of how emotions are transmitted through cellular communication, see Candace Pert,MoleculesofEmotions:TheScienceBehindMind-BodyMedicine(Simon andSchuster,1999).556.JoanOcean,DolphinConnection:Interdimensional Ways of Living(SpiralDolphinConnection, 1989).Ms.

Oceanhasawebsiteat:http://www.joanocean.com/w.joanocean.com.557.Dan Sherman, Above Black: Project Preserve Destiny Insider Account of Alien Contact & GovernmentCover-Up(OneTeamPublications,1997).See also website:http://www.aboveblack.com.558. John Quinn, “Phoenix Undead: The Montauk Project and Camp Hero Today,” (NewsHawk Inc, 1998).Availableonlineat:http://vs03.tvsecure.com/~vs030f1/monew.htm.559.Richard Boylan,“QuotationsfromChairmanWolf,”in BoylanandBoylan,LaboredJourneyToTheStars.Availableonlineat:http://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html.

560.NerudaInterview, #1:www.wingmakers.com.561.See“Testimonyof a BrigadierGeneralStevenLovekin,” Disclosure,

ed.Greer,p. 235.562.SeeZechariaSitchin, Divine Encounters:AGuidetoVisions,AngelsandOtherEmissaries(AvonBooks, 1996).

563.An excellentoverviewof occultsocietiesis Lyn PicknettandClivePrince, The StargateConspiracy(BerkleyBooks, 2001).564.For onlineinformationon Dr. Greer’sworkshops, see website of theCenter for the Study of ExtraterrestrialIntelligence, http://www. cseti.org. For online information on Lyssa Royal’s seminars/workshops see:http://www.lyssaroyal.com.565.For discussionof crop circlesandthe geometricalpatternsfound,see WernerAnderhubandHansRoth,CropCircles:ExploringtheDesigns&Mysteries(LarkBooks,2002);FreddySilva,Secrets in theFields: The ScienceandMysticism ofCropCircles (HamptonRoads,2002);andNickKollerstrom&BustyTayler,CropCircles: The HiddenForm (Wessex Books, 2002).

566.See BuckminsterFuller,Synergetics(MacMillanPublishingCo., 1982).567.For discussionof how eachelement corresponds to a Platonic solid, see Plato’s “Timeaus,” Timaeus andCritias,ed. H.D.Lee(VikingPress, 1972).

568.Vitruvius,The Ten Books on Architecture,tran. MorrisHickeyMorgan(NewYork:Dover Publications,Inc.,1960).

569.Vitruvius,The Ten Books on Architecture,Book III.p. i.2.570.His two books are The Ancient Secret of the Flower of Life,Vols. 1–2 (Light Technology Publications, 1999/2002).Melchizedekhasawebsiteforhis trainingtechnique:http://www.floweroflife.org.

306

http://www.joanocean.com


http://vs03



http://www.lyssaroyal.com

http://www.floweroflife.org

571.ThetrainingscheduleforMelchizedek’sworkshopscanbe foundonlineat: http://www.floweroflife.org.572.Fordiscussionofthe worldgridandsacred geometry, see DavidHatcher Childress, Anti-Gravity and theWorldGrid(AdventuresUnlimitedPress, 1987).

573.ANew ScienceofLife.574.RupertSheldrake,ANew ScienceofLife.

307

http://www.floweroflife.org

AbouttheAuthor

Dr.MichaelE.SallahasheldacademicappointmentsintheSchoolofInternationalService, American University,Washington DC (1996–2001), and the Department ofPoliticalScience, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia (1994–96).Hetaughtas an adjunct faculty member atGeorgeWashingtonUniversity, WashingtonDC,in2002.He iscurrentlyresearchingmethodsofTransformationalPeaceas aResearcherinResidence in theCenter forGlobal Peace (2001–2004) anddirecting the Center’sPeace Ambassador Program which uses transformational peace techniques forindividualself-empowerment.

Dr. Salla hasa PhD. inGovernmentfrom theUniversity ofQueensland,Australia,andanMAinPhilosophyfromtheUniversityofMelbourne,Australia.Heisthe authorofTheHero’sJourneyTowarda SecondAmericanCentury(GreenwoodPress,2002) andco-editor/author of three other books. He has authored more than seventy articles,chapters, and book reviews on peace, ethnic conflict and conflict resolution andconducted research and fieldwork in the ethnic conflicts in East Timor, Kosovo,Macedonia,andSriLanka.

308

Index

Admiral RichardByrd,122,123,125

entry inhis diary, 124,163seealso “OperationHigh

Jump”‘alien abductions’,273ancientLemurian/Atlantean,

163,165anti-gravitytechnology,32,

112,113first successfulU.S.antigravityflight, 137

Anunnaki,26, 27, 151,195,199,207,209,229,231“bluebloods”,28concealedon Earth,28finaldeparture,208prophesiedreturnof,

208three differentperspectives,209

first, 209second,210third,211“rank andfileAnunnaki”,

207returnof, 29soughttominegold,195,

196 testimonyof,29 transportationusedby,206,207

two distinctraces,27seealso Nibiru; ‘Reptilian’Anunnakiremnants(see

Anunnaki)archangelsMichaeland

Lucifer,152

“blackprograms”,64, 151seealso SAP

BlankSlateTechnology,204Book of Enoch,27, 152,197aboutangel“Nephilim”,

197,198Book ofGenesis,27, 159,198“Brain Enhancement”

Technology,176brain wave states,274four distinctfrequencyrangesAlpha, 274Beta,274Delta,275

Theta,274

‘Cabal’, 96, 140,178

seealso clandestineorganizations 310

“channels”,18, 19, 25, 31, 34, 35BarbaraMarciniak, 199JelailaStarr, 199SheldanNidle,200

clandestineorganizations,149,230–233,245–247“AdvancedContact

IntelligenceOrganization”(ACIO),172“Bilderberggroupmeeting”,

174,175,234,235Blackmissions,171cooperation,175ETinfiltration of, 176“goodshepherd”,177,179“protectiveparent”,

179,180“wise mentor”,180

311

clandestineorganizations

(continued)evidence,150,151 factionaldifferences,150MJ-12,172,173

“official” versionof, 173seealso “wise men”NationalSecurityCouncil’scommittees,70

Committee5412,70, 173subcommitteePI-40, 173,

174RespondingtoETInfiltration,

180–182Rockefeller,175Structureof, 170,171

Columbiadisaster,250“commons”,24seealso ‘Grays’conspiracytheories,1, 2“CouncilofNine”,168

“deepblack”,64, 67, 138

seealso SAPdensitylevels (seehumancivilization)

destructionof theChallenger,250

“divinegovernance”,208,209ETfactionsET/godEnki,151,196ET/godEnlil,151,196moralcategories,152,153“triadicframework”,153seealso ETraces;three

modelsof ETracesETperspectivesinterventionist,149non-interventionist,149

seealso ETraces;four mainETperspectives;threemodelsof ETraces

ETpresence,1, 170,192Godsof Eden,197in Iraq, 96, 99, 193testimonies,149

seealso ‘Grays’;liveETs;politicalmanagementof theETpresence;Sourcesof InformationETracesbrain wave states,275,276Founding/Centralrace,168“guardianrace”,157

non-officialcommunicationwith ETRaces,281officialcommunicationwith

ETraces,278,281empathic,279telepathic,278off-world, 20, 157,

165,166seealso “Nordics”and

“Semites”SummaryofMotivationsand

Activities, 169terrestriallybased, 165seealso ‘Reptilian’Zeta Gray, 178,179

seealso threemodelsof ETracesexopoliticalanalysis,192

ofUSmotivationforpreemptivewar in Iraq,312

212archeologicallysignificantevents

first, 216second,217third,217USdestabilizedIraq, 236twofoldstrategy,236,237

exopolitics,2needfor, 2, 49

313

famousUFO incident(see

Roswell crash)FirstContact,261as a political process,264–270threecontrastingscenarios,

265–269as a social process,270–273“abductees”,270,271

completingtheprocess,286–288

threeparts,261–263firstGulfWar, 240–245

USstrategicbindafterthewar, 245fivepolicy recommendations,

47–49Foo-Fighter,137

seealso anti-gravitytechnologyfoundationsfor globallymanagingETaffairs,125–127

four main ETperspectives,20Helper,30–35Nordicsor Semites,30

Intruder,20–25ET-abducteeinteraction,21Manipulator,26–30“Custodians”,26seealso AnunnakiWatcher,35“motherof all

conspiracies”,42seealso Summaryof ETPerspectivesandConspiracyTheories

geneticallymanufactured

“Jesus”,160giftedchildren“CrystalChildren”,272“IndigoChildren”,272

“StarChildren”,272Gilgamesh(seeKing

Gilgamesh)‘Grays’,22, 23, 28, 158, 230, 231createa hybridrace,24, 25,

271,272telepathiccommunication,

24, 25, 278seealso “ProjectPreserve

Destiny”seealso ETraces;giftedchildren;threemodelsofETraces

“greatflood”,152seealso Sumeriangods;ZechariahSitchin

“GreatGalacticExperiment”,39, 40

‘GreatShift’,38, 41

HAARP,46Hammurabi’sCode,216helperETs,30–35

314

assisthumanity,31–33interactionwith Earth,33, 34principalsupporters,31seealso four mainperspectives

Henry Kissinger, 80–82,84, 98as a DirectorofMJ-12,

84, 89as a Directorof PI-40, 82,

83, 90managerialstyle, 84–87“Realpolitik”,85, 86seealso “OperationPaperclip”High-frequencyActive AuroralResearchProject(seeHAARP)

humancivilization, 37, 38humanproportions(see

VitruvianMan)

315

human-ETinteraction,274–278“gestalt-likeknowing”,279“suggestivetelepathy”,280,281

Hynek’ssystem(seethreetypesofCloseEncounters(CE))implicationsfor policy makers,

44–46Iraq, 95

attemptstotakemilitaryadvantageof theIranianrevolution,238–240Evidencefor a Historic ETPresence,193

seealso “Stargate”key roguestate,96Shiites andSunnis, 238tunnelconstructions,239,240USforeignpolicy, 241–245USintervention,98, 99

seealso primary motivationfor 2003GulfwarIslamic fundamentalism,236, 237

joint ET-humanbases

(seeliveETs)

KingGilgamesh,217,218“immortality”,218

Kuwait, 241–243

liveETs,22

treatywith theEisenhoweradministration,22, 23,33, 82, 157,158,162,163

seealso ‘Grays’;1954GreadaTreaty

lootingof Iraqi NationalMuseum,216

organized“looting”,217

“Majestic12” (seeMJ-12/PI-40)Martiancivilization, 16Mayan cycle, 36, 37, 41, 211“missingtime”,276,277seealso brain wave states

MJ-12/PI-40,61, 65, 67, 70–72,77–79,84

masterstrategistfor, 89SpecialStudiesGroup/PI-40,

71, 72, 75seealso Henry Kissinger

MK-Ultra,132monatomicgold,196

MontaukProject,133,134,179,203,215

Nazi Germany,109,110,120

assistancefrom ETs,115,136

316

Belluzzo-Schriever-MietheDiskus, 112

communicatingwith ETraces,109,110,114,115Primary lessons,125“crashed”ETcraft, 114,115

Hitler, 111,112,116occultcommunications,115

Munich agreement,117Nazi elite,110,111,

130,136hiddeninAntarctica,123SouthAmerica,130,131

operational“ETcraft”,110,122,136

Vril 1, 112“psychicchanneling”,109,

111,112,115remnantsrelocatedtoAntarcticaandSouthAmerica,122,130,136–139

317

Congressionalinquiry, 140retreattoAntarctica,120–122submarineactivity, 121,122Thule Society,112,124Vril Society,112

Nazi scientists,80, 81, 114,131,132,139experiments,132“Trojanhorse”,139

Nibiru, 159,194,195,210,229homeworld of theAnunnaki,

196,197“Nordics”and“Semites”,

165,166appearance,165seealso ETraces“OperationHigh

Jump”,122–124commandsissuedtoAdmiral

Byrd,122seealso Nazi Germany

“OperationPaperclip”,80, 131PhoenixProject,204“planetaryspringcleaning”,37Pleiades,18, 19, 30, 31seealso helperETs

politicalmanagementof theETpresence,59

adhoc committees,65ColdWar, 83CorporateAmerica,60, 61,

67, 86Council on Foreign

Relations,70membersof, 71

fivehistoric phases,59, 60CrisisManagement,61–64

The Era ofAutonomyandImpunityforClandestineOrganizations,78–95

seealso Henry KissingerThe Erosionof ExecutiveOversightofClandestineOrganizations,67–78linked with Kennedy’sassassination,76

The Political Managementof Iraq andItsAncientETTechnology,

95–99The Truman AdministrationandtheDecisiontoMaintain Secrecy,64–67

key roles,92”military-industrialcomplex”,

69, 72, 73, 76Eisenhower’sfamouswarning,72, 73

PresidentialadministrationsBush, 92, 212Carter,87, 88

politicalimpotenceof,87, 88

Clinton,93, 94politicalimpotence,94

318

Eisenhower,60, 67, 68, 70,71–74,77

GeorgeW.Bush,94, 95“hawks”,96, 97

Johnson,78Kennedy,74–76Reagan,89, 90, 92

firstmajor publiccomment,90, 91Rockefellerfamily,68, 70, 72,

175seealso Henry Kissinger

seealso MJ-12/PI-40preemptivewar againstIraq,

191,227,228

319

preemptivewar againstIraq

(continued)America’sTriumphand

Europe’sAngst,253–255Bush administration’smotivation,191,213dangerousriftbetweenUSandEuropeanclandestineorganizations,248–253

exopoliticalparadigm,192first factor,211,212implicationsof, 218–220secondfactor,212primary motivationfor 2003

Gulfwar, 96, 97ProjectMonarch,132 “ProjectPounce”,128,129 “ProjectPreserveDestiny”,172,

232,279seealso clandestineorganizations

ProphesiedReturn of theGods,208–211

‘Reptilian’, 27, 29, 155,157,

160,161,165,199returnofAnunnakielite,

28, 30seealso Anunnakireverseengineeringof ETtechnology,1, 8, 20, 33,45–49,69

CorporateAmerica,68inU.S., 137military-industrialcomplex,

74, 78MJ-12,67Nazi scientists,80, 81, 110“PhiladelphiaExperiment”,

62, 203,215

seealso clandestineorganizationRoswell crash 7, 8, 65clandestineprojects,8, 65black budget,69

sacredgeometricalforms,

167,283CropCircles, 282,283,285“goldenmeanspiral”,284Melchizedek’swork, 284,285“Platonicsolids”,283sacredsite, 286

SaddamHussein,212,213,238,243

Iran-Iraq war, 239SAP,63 “acknowledged”,63“unacknowledged”,63 waived,63, 67

“saucerships”,120,122,136“scalarweapons”,250–252Schwabenland,121,123

seealso Nazi Germany“SecondComing”,160“secondgulf war”, 227plausiblecase,247,248

SecondWorld War, 117–119Kugelbitz,120

320

SecretAgendatoGain AccesstoIraq’sETTechnology,234,235

secretglobalrecoverysystem(see“ProjectPounce”)“serpents”,27

seealso ‘Reptilian’solar cycle, 36Sourcesof Information,3coverup, 3, 7“disinformation”,4Maynard’srevelation,4, 5

intimidation,5, 66, 67

321

victim Forrestal,5, 6, 66rankings,6, 7moderate,16, 30 “strong”,9, 11,25, 35 strong-moderate,13, 14 weak, 19, 42weak-moderate,18

sevencategories,6Abductions/Contacts,10, 11surprisingconsistency,10

BlackVault,13Channeling,18DocumentaryEvidence,

13, 14Freedomof InformationAct

(FOIA),13 (exemptions,13, 14)Hynek, 12

IndependentArcheology,16–18

RemoteViewing,14,15confirmationof, 15viewers,15, 16UFOBriefing Document:Best AvailableEvidence,12

Whistle Blowers, 7–9, 23USmilitary oath,8

Witness/SightingsReports,11

consecutiveinquiries,11ProjectBlue Book, 11,

65, 69 (terminationof, 79)theCondonReport,11

seealso four mainperspectives;RoswellcrashSpecialAccessProgram

(seeSAP)“Stargate”,201,202,204,207

controlof, 213–215

in Iraq, 212–214motivatetheUS-led militaryinterventionin Iraq, 215

“ProjectGalileo”,201Sumeriancuneiformtexts,17,

18, 193,212knowledgeof solar system,

194,195seealso ZechariahSitchin

SumeriangodsAnu, 201Enki,152,200Enlil,152,200factionalconflict,152

Sumerians(seeSumeriancuneiformtexts)SummaryofETPerspectivesand

ConspiracyTheories,43“supersoldiers”,132,205interviewwith Jared,

205,206“supermen”,232

322

tenthplanet(seeNibiru)threemodelsof ETraces,153“goodshepherd”,153–161“Faustianbargains”,155threesub-groups,155–161“wolves”,155

DracoReptilians/Gianthumanoids,160“Grays”,158

Nephilim,159“Reptilian”,156,157“protectiveparent”,161–166first sub-group,163,164GalacticFederation,161secondsub-group,165“whitebrothers/gods”,164seealso “Nordics”and

“Semites”“wise mentor”,166,167

323

threemodelsof ETraces

(continued)“Councils”,168 “languageof light”,167 two sub-groups,167,168seealso ETraces

threetypesofCloseEncounters(CE),263

UnderstandingtheDynamicsofInteractionbetweenDifferentETfactionsandHumanity,151

victoriousAllied powers,110,

111,113,116,120,125fivemain policiesfor globallymanagingETaffairs, 127

CooperatingtoEnd theNazi Threat,136–138ManagingETArtifactsFoundaroundthePlanet,135,136Non-Disclosureof ETAffairs,127–129

Non-Disclosureof theET-NaziConnectionandCounteringNaziInfluenceinSouthAmerica,130,131RepatriationofNaziScientists/Technologiesand

ContinuingNaziSponsoredMindControlProjects,

131–135Yaltaagreement,128,135,

233,236VitruvianMan, 284Figureof, 285

seealso sacredgeometricalforms“war of thegods”,151

seealso ETfactions“wise men”,71, 173,174“Woodpeckergrid”,250seealso destructionof the

Challenger

ZechariahSitchin, 17, 26, 27,

154,229aboutETraces,151,157,

159,163,199aboutSumerians,194,195Anunnaki’svisit, 195controversialapproach,

17, 197storiesof thegods,193,194

seealso SumeriancuneiformtextsZoroastrianismand

Manicheaism,152

1954GreadaTreaty,24, 82

324

Dandelion-Books.com

AlwaysAvailablethroughwww.amazon.com&OtherOnline&Brick&MortarBookstores!!

TOLL-FREEORDERS–1-800-861-7899(U.S.&CANADA)

Non-Fiction–Uncensored&Unfettered:DeathwithoutFear:ComfortforThoseFacingDeathorBereavement,byTonyStubbs…ForgettheGrimReaper;openuptothewildestrideofyourlifeasyoucrossthefinalfrontier.Hearfirst-handaccounts,toldthroughmediums,ofwhatit’sliketodie,whattheafterlifeislike,andwhatpeopledoontheotherside.Contrarytowhatorganizedreligiontellsus,youarewhole,youthful,eternalandveryplayful,notsomberandserious.(ISBN978-0-9789611-6-9)$20.00+S&HRealizingaNewCulture,RealizingaNewAmericaandaNewWorld,byNormanLivergood&MichelleMairesse…“Worldwide,thinkingpeoplearefacedwiththeterrorofthedemoniccabalcontrollingAmericaandtheworld.Thiscabalhascorruptedandcontaminatedtheoldculturetothepointthatifwelocateourprimarybeinginthatculturewe'llbecomeasinsaneandcorruptasthey.Wehavenootherrecoursethantorealizeanewculturecomposedofnewphysical,psychological,andmetaphysicalprinciplesandstructures.(ISBN978-0-9789611-5-2)$24.95+S&HTranscendYourReligion&EmbraceYourSpirituality,byRicMason…“Religionhasoutwornitsstay.It’stimetotranscendthesearchaicbeliefsystemsandembraceanauthenticunderstandingofourselvesasspiritualbeingsinphysicalbodies.Sufficientevidenceshowstoday’sreligiousdoctrines,dogmasandpracticesarenotdivinelyinspiredasoncebelieved,butcraftilyandofteninsidiouslyconstructedtosuitthegreedandneedofthepowergroupoftheday.”(ISBN978-0-9789611-3-8)$19.95+S&HIt’sAllaboutControl:TheGod,JesusandETCoverupConspiracies,byTonyStubbs…Three

325

http://www.amazon.com

majorconspiraciesarecontrollingthepeopleofplanetEarth:Thisbookprovidesthetruth-serumandtoolsforbreakingfreefromacruel,cleverlycontrivedmind-controlgamethatforcenturieshasbeenkeepingthehumanraceinbondagetotheReligion,WarandFinanceindustries.(1-893302-95-4)$24.95+S&HAdam&Evil:TheGodWhohatesSex,WomenandHumanBodies,byTheHeyeokahGuru…EXPOSED:‘JesusChrist’isamythologicalfigure,notapersonTheVirginMaryistheEarth,notayoungwomanwhoneverhadsex;HeavenandHellarerighthere!Wecreatethemourselves.Thetruthatlastaboutoneofthegreatestconspiraciesintheworld!(ISBN1-893302-94-6)-$16.95($18.95Canada)+S&HOverthrowoftheAmericanRepublic–TheWritingsofShermanH.Skolnick,byShermanH.Skolnick…Knownas“America’sleadingjudge-buster,”thelateShermanH.SkolnickwasoneofAmerica’smostcourageousandoutrageousjournalists.Thiscollectionofhisinternetwritingsalsoincludes24articlesthatwereneverpublishedonhiswebsite.Overthrow,whichcontainsover80Skolnickarticles,isacomplementtoSkolnick’sAheadoftheParade,publishedbyDandelionBooksin2003.(ISBN1-893302-22-9),$29.95US,$35.00CAN+S&H;2–bookSkolnickpackage-$43.00+S&HAheadOfTheParade:AWho’sWhoOfTreasonandHighCrimes–ExclusiveDetailsOfFraudAndCorruptionOfTheMonopolyPress,TheBanks,TheBenchAndTheBar,AndTheSecretPoliticalPolice,byShermanH.Skolnick…OneofAmerica’sforemostinvestigativereporters,speaksoutonsomeofAmerica’scurrentcrises.Includedinthisblockbusterbookarethefollowingarticles:BigCityNewspapers&theMob,TheSuckerTraps,DirtyTricksofFinanceandBrokerage,TheSecretHistoryofAirplaneSabotage,Wal-MartandtheRedChineseSecretPolice,TheChandraLevyAffair,TheJapaneseMafiaintheUnitedStates,TheSecretsofTimothyMcVeigh,andmuchmore.(ISBN1-893302-32-6)-$20.95+S&HTaboo:AMemoir–ConfessionsofForbiddenLove,byTomHathaway…Abraveandhonestexplorationoftheprimallustofourpsyches,Taboopointsthewaytoanewsexualfrontier.Womenwhowanttoknowwhatmenreallywantmustreadthiseroticrhapsody.A21stCenturyLadyChatterly’sLoverbyaprolificnewauthorwhosenamewillsoonbecomeahouseholdword.(ISBN1-893302-87-3)$18.95+S&HTrackingDeception:BushMid-EastPolicy,byWilliamA.Cook…“BillCookwriteswithvividurgencyasheexcavatestheAugeanmuckoftheBushyears,subjectingthepresidentandhisgangtoanexcruciatinglytightclose-up,whereeveryflaw,everyimperfection,everytouch-upisexposedtoallwhodaretolook.”—AlexCockburn,CounterpunchEditor-in-Chief[fromtheIntroduction](ISBN1-893302-83-0)$22.95+S&HExopolitics:PoliticalImplicationsOfTheExtraterrestrialPresence,byMichaelE.Salla,Ph.D….AccordingtoDr.MichaelSallaandmanyotherexpertsinthefieldofETresearch,foralmost70yearstheUSgovernmenthasengagedinanextensive“officialeffort”of

326

disinformation,intimidationandtamperingwithevidenceinordertomaintainanon-disclosurepolicyaboutextraterrestrialpresence.(ISBN1-893302-56-3)$22.95+S&HAmericaSpeaksOut:CollectedEssaysFromDissidentWritersJohnH.Brand,MeriaHeller,JohnKaminski,NormanD.Livergood,WayneMadsen,KurtNimmo,AlbertD.Pastore,MichaelE.Salla,ShermanH.Skolnick&JohnStanton…AcollectionofessaysextractedfromworksrecentlypublishedbyDandelionBooks.(ISBN1-893302-63-6)–$24.95+S&HAmerica2004:APowerButNotSuper,byJohnStanton[ForewordbyBevConover,Editor-onlinejournal.com,IntroductionbyKarenKwiatkowski,LieutenantColonel,USAF(Ret.)]…StantonexplainshowBushhasadroitlyfusedstate,religious(faith-basedgovernment)andbusinessinterestsintooneindistinguishabletyrannicalmass…hisexplanationofhowthishasbeenaccomplishediseye-opening.(ISBN1-893302-26-1)-$18.95+S&HStrangerthanFiction:AnIndependentInvestigationOfTheTrueCulpritsBehind9-11,byAlbertD.Pastore,Ph.D…Twelvemonthsofcarefulstudy,painstakingresearch,detailedanalysis,sourceverificationandlogicaldeductionwentintothewritingofthisbook.Inadditiontothestoriesareapproximately300detailedfootnotes.Pastore:“OnlybysiftingthroughhugeamountsofnewsdataonadailybasiswasIabletocatchmanyoftheserare‘diamondsintherough’andorganizethemintoacoherentpatternandlogicalargument.”(ISBN1-893302-47-4)–$17.95+S&HUnshackled:ASurvivor’sStoryofMindControl,byKathleenSullivan…Anon-fictionalaccountofKathleenSullivan’sexperiencesaspartofacriminalnetworkthatincludesIntelligencepersonnel,militarypersonnel,doctorsandmentalhealthprofessionalscontractedbythemilitaryandtheCIA,criminalcultleadersandmembers,pedophiles,pornographers,drugdealersandNazis.“Ibelievemystoryneedstobetoldsothatmorepeoplewillunderstandhow‘ManchurianCandidate’stylemind-controltechniquescancreatealter-statesinthemindsofunwittingvictims,causingthemtoperformdeedsthatarenormallyrepugnant.”(ISBN1-893302-35-0)$24.95+S&HAnotherDayinTheEmpire:LifeinNeoconservativeAmerica,byKurtNimmo…AcollectionofarticlesbyoneofCounterpunch’smostpopularcolumnists.Includedinthiscollectionare:TheSonofCOINTELPRO;CluelessattheStateDepartment;BushSenior:HatingSaddam,SellingHimWeapons;CorporateMedia:SellingDubya'sOilWar;IraqandtheVisionoftheVelociraptors:TheBleedingEdgeofIslam;CondoleezzaRiceattheWaldorfAstoria;Predators,SnipersandthePosseComitatusAct,andmanyothers.(ISBN1-893302-75-X)-$17.95+S&HPalestine&TheMiddleEast:Passion,Power&Politics,byJafferAli…ThePalestinianstruggleisactuallyahumanonethattranscendsPalestine…ThereisnolongeraplaceforZionisminthe20thcentury…DemocracyintheMiddleEastisnotsafeforUSinterestsaslongasthereisanatmosphereofhostility…Suicidebombingsareactsofdesperationandmeanthatapeoplehavebeenpushedtothebrink…failuretounderstandwhytheyhappenwill

327

makecertaintheywillcontinue.JafferAliisaPalestinian-Americanbusinessmanwhohasbeenwritingonpoliticsandbusinessforover25years.(ISBN1-893302-45-8)-$14.95+S&HBen-Gurion’sScandals:HowTheHaganahAndTheMossadEliminatedJews,byNaeimGiladi…ThepainfultruthabouttheZionistrapeofPalestineanddeliberateplantingofanti-SemitisminIraqiJewishcommunitiesduringDavidBen-Gurion’spoliticalcareerinordertopersuadetheIraqiJewstoimmigratetoIsrael.(ISBN1-893302-40-7)$18.95+S&HAmerica,Awake!WeMustTakeBackOurCountry,byNormanD.Livergood…Thisbookisintendedasawake-upcallforAmericans,asPaulRevereawakenedtheLexingtonpatriotstotheBritishattackonApril18,1775,andasThomasPaine'sCommonSenserousedapatheticAmericancoloniststorecognizeandstruggleagainstBritishoppression.OurcurrentsituationissimilartothatwhichAmericanpatriotsfacedinthe1770s:acountryruledby‘foreign’and‘domestic’plutocraticpowersandadividedcitizenryuncertainoftheirvitalinterests.(ISBN1-893302-27-X)$18.95+S&HAmerica’sNightmare:ThePresidencyofGeorgeBushII,byJohnStanton&WayneMadsen…Media&Language,War&Weapons,InternalAffairsandavarietyofotherissuespointingouttheUS“crisiswithoutprecedent”thatwaswroughtbytheUSPresidentialelectionof2000followedby9/11.“Stanton&Madsenwillchallengemanyofthethingsyou’vebeentoldbyCNNandFoxnews.Thisbookisdangerous.”(ISBN1-893302-29-6)$18.95+S&HAmerica’sAutopsyReport,byJohnKaminski…ThefalsefabricofhistoryisunravelingbeneathanavalancheofpathologicalliestojustifyendlesswarandOrwelliannewlawsthatrevoketherightsofAmericans.WhileTVandnewspapersglorifythedangerousideasofpervertedbillionaires,theInternethaspulsatedwithoutrageandprovidedanewandrealforumforfreedomamongconcernedpeopleallovertheworldwhoareopposedtothemassmurderandcriminalexploitationofthedefenselessvictimsofmultinationalcorporatetotalitarianism.JohnKaminski’spassionateessaysgivevoicetothosehopesandfearsofhumanepeoplethatareignoredbythebigbusinessshysterswhorulethemajormedia.(ISBN1-893302-42-3)$18.95+S&HSeedsOfFire:ChinaAndTheStoryBehindTheAttackOnAmerica,byGordonThomas…TheinsidestoryaboutChinathatnoonecanaffordtoignore.UsinghisunsurpassedcontactsinIsrael,Washington,LondonandEurope,GordonThomas,internationallyacclaimedbest-sellingauthorandinvestigativereporterforoveraquarter-century,revealsinformationaboutChina’sintentionstousethecurrentcrisistolaunchitselfasasuper-powerandbecomeAmerica’snewmajorenemy…“Thishasbeenkeptoutofthenewsagendabecauseitdoesnotsuitcertainbusinessintereststohavethattruthemerge…EverypatrioticAmericanshouldbuyandreadthisbook…itissimplyrevelatory.”(RayFlynn,FormerU.S.AmbassadortotheVatican)(ISBN1-893302-54-7)-$25.95+S&HShakingTheFoundations:ComingOfAgeInThePostmodernEra,byJohnH.Brand,D.Min.,

328

J.D….ScientificdiscoveriesintheTwentiethCenturyrequiretherestructuringofourunderstandingthenatureofNatureandofhumanbeings.Insimplelanguagetheauthorexplainshowsignificantimplicationsofquantummechanics,astronomy,biologyandbrainphysiologyformthefoundationfornewperspectivestocomprehendthemeaningofourlives.(ISBN1-893302-25-3)$14.95+S&HRebuildingTheFoundations:ForgingANewAndJustAmerica,byJohnH.Brand,D.Min.,J.D….Shouldweexpectalearnedscholartowarnusaboutourdangerousreptilianbrainsthataretherealcauseoftoday’sevils?AlthoughBrandisnotwithouthopeforrescuingAmerica,hewarnsustoactfast–andnow.Evilmenintentonimposingtheirpolitical,economic,andreligiousself-servinggoalsonAmericaarenotfarfromachievingtheirgoalofmastery.”(ISBN1-893302-33-4)$18.95+S&HTheLastAtlantisBookYou’llEverHaveToRead!byGeneD.Matlock…Morethan25,000books,pluscountlessotherarticleshavebeenwrittenaboutafabledconfederationofcity-statesknownasAtlantis.Ifitreallydidexist,wherewasitlocated?Doesanyonehavevalidevidenceofitsexistence–artifactsandotherremnants?Accordingtohistorian,archaeologist,educatorandlinguistGeneD.Matlock,bothquestionscaneasilybeanswered.(ISBN1-893302-20-2)$16.95+S&HCancerDoctor:TheBiographyJosefIssels,M.D.,WhoBroughtHopeToTheWorldWithHisRevolutionaryCancerTreatment,byGordonThomas…Dr.JosefIsselstreatedmorethan12,000cancerpatientswhohadbeenwrittenoffas“incurable”byotherdoctors.Heclaimednomiraclecures,butthesuccessrecordofhisrevolutionary“wholepersontreatment”wasextraordinary…thestoryofhisstruggleagainstthemedicalestablishmentwhichputDr.Isselsinprison,chargedwithfraudandmanslaughter.(ISBN1-893302-18-0)$18.95+S&HNon-Fiction–ConsciousSolutions:Marrisingle:GrowingfromChaos-Howonewomanlearnedtothriveonliving“marriedto”&“separatedfrom”theLoveofherLife!ByBrendaFrantz…WritesMs.Frantz:“Bytellingmystory,I’mgivingmyselfthecourageandconfidencetosharewithyouthemostintimatemomentsofmylifeandhowIcametoinventtheterm“Marrisingle.”Thisterm,rootedinmyexperiences,thenbecamethebasisfordevelopingauniquestop-lossrelationshipscounselingandtherapyprogram.Ithasbecomemylifemissiontohelppeoplebecomeempoweredasindividualsandaspartnersinrelationshipsfoundedonlove,commitmentandtrust.(ISBN978-0-9789611-4-5)$23.95+S&HARediscoveryofFreeWill:AnUn-Doing,byFrederickJ.Smith,M.D….Haveyouhadyour10“HitsofJoy”today?Haveyouhadyour5“MomentsofPeace”?Isyourintuitionrunning,andavailabletoyou?Areyour‘hunches’reliable?Canyougetyourselfintothe‘zone’?Areyouableto,eachday,openyourheartandlettheloveout,atleastonce,withoutfearorcaution?Theseandmore,arethePracticalPayoffsofinvestingyourtime,energy,andfocusin“arediscoveryoffreewill.”(ISBN1-893302-98-9)$17.00+S&H

329

LivingwithSoul:AnOldSoul’sGuidetoLife,theUniverseandEverything,Vol.I,byTonyStubbs…Whoarewe?Wheredidwecomefrom?Whyarewehere?MasterteacherandsageTonyStubbsurgesusto“gototheSource…lookinthemirror.”Inthefirstofatwo-volumecompendiumofcomprehensivespiritualteachings,Stubbsexpertlydocumentshislessonsandobservationswithexcellentanecdotes,chartsandothergraphics.(ISBN1-893302-85-7)$27.95+S&HLivingwithSoul:AnOldSoul’sGuidetoLife,theUniverseandEverything,Vol.II,byTonyStubbs…Learnhowtoworkwithenergyandmakeitworkforyoubydiscoveringyourownenergypatternsorbio-rhythms.Explorereincarnation,death,grief,near-deathexperiences,lifeonthe“otherside”andmanyothermulti-dimensionalexperiences.AlsolearnmoreaboutthecomingU.S.disclosuresconcerningextraterrestrials,UFOsandmanyover-upsthatmayhave“Earth-shattering”repercussionsforthosewhountilnowhavebeenunwillingtoacceptthat“wearenotalone.”(ISBN1-893302-86-5)-$27.95+S&HUnveilthePast:HealtheFuturethroughHypnotherapy,byDorisSmallProiette,DCH,Ph.D….AmazingstoriesfromDr.Proiette’sclinicalrecordsaboutthehealingpowerofpastliferegressionthatreaffirmsthepowerofthemindandtheabilityforeveryhumanbeingtoreleasethemselvesfromunwantedfeelingsandbeliefsystems.Dr.Proiette’sbookssupportsstatisticsthatshowHypnotherapyastheleadingtechnologyforhelpingpeoplehealtheirissuesofdis-easeanddysfunction.(ISBN1-893302-96-2)-$19.95+S&HRediscoveringPlatoandtheMysticalScienceofDialectic,byNormanD.Livergood(Ebookonly)…“TheGreekthinkerPlato(428-348BCE)speakstrenchantlytoustodayabouttwenty-firstcenturybarbarism…AdemoniccabalhasseizedpowerandimposedafascisticdictatorshipontheUnitedStates.ItisonlywhenteachingslikePlato’sdialoguesbecomecurrentagainintheWestthatwewillbeabletoriseabovebarbarityanddepravitytoamoreenlightenedexistence.”(ISBN978-1-934280-61-4)$11.00PortalstoHigherConsciousness:ExploringtheSpiritualDomain,byNormanD.Livergood…Whatistheprocessthatseriousstudentsusetoactuallyrealize—bringtomanifestation—theirHigherConsciousness,“throughwhichtheyareabletocontactRealityinaregionofpureTruth.”Ifyou’reinterestedininvestigatinghigherconsciousness,putonyourhikingclothesandjointhisspiritualexpedition(1-893302-92X)$29.95+S&HCreationandMetempsychosis(TheEvolutionoftheSoul):AnIntroductiontothe“PsychologicalKeyofMan,”editedandcompiledbyQ.DeanSloan…AcompilationoftheosophicalmetaphysicsthatprovidesthetechnicalmetaphysicalrationaleforCreationitself,aswellasCreationofthehumansoul(“crownchakra”)andisbasedonthepsychologyofthe7rays.“The‘petals’inthecrownchakraunfoldslowlyoveralongseriesoflives,andweachieveperfectiononlywhentheyhavecompletelyunfolded.”(ISBN1-893302-90-3)$36.95+S&H

330

ThePerennialTradition:OverviewOfTheSecretHeritage,TheSingleStreamOfInitiatoryTeachingFlowingThroughAllTheGreatSchoolsOfMysticism,byNormanD.Livergood…LikeAmerica,Awake,thisbookisanotherwake-upcall.“ItwaswrittentoassistreaderstoawakentotheHigherSpiritualWorld.”InadditiontoprovidingahistoryoftheWesterntraditionofthePerennialTradition,Livergoodalsodescribestheprocessthatseriousstudentsusetoactuallyrealize--bringtomanifestation--theirHigherConsciousness.“Unlesswebecomeawareofthishigherstate,wefacetheprospectofabasicallyuselessphysicalexistenceandafuturelife--followingphysicaldeath--ofunpleasant,perhapsanguishedreformationofouressence.”(ISBN1-893302-48-2)-$21.95+S&HProgressiveAwareness:CriticalThinking,Self-Awareness&CriticalConsciousness,byNormanD.Livergood…howtoavoidbeingmanipulatedbyouremotionsandideasandhowtostartthinkingforourselves;increaseyourskillsforunderstanding,criticalthinking,self-awareness,criticalconsciousness,andenlighteneddiscernment.(ISBN1-893302-80-6)-$19.95+S&HMyNameisEstherClara,byLaurelJohnson…EstherClara’slifetimespannedtwoworldwarsandtheinventionsofelectricity,telephones,automobiles,airplanes,radio,TV,computersandmanyotherconveniencesthathavebecomebasicnecessitiesofmodernAmericanlife.Anauthenticfirst-handaccountof20thCenturyruralAmericaaudioandvideotapedbeforeherdeathandadeptlyreconstitutedbymasterstorytellerandbookreviewer,LaurelJohnson.(ISBN1-893302-89-X)–$16.95+S&HRomanceStew:TheWaytoaWoman’sHeart,byBeckyRuff...Ifyou’veevertriedtocookupamanorwomaninyourlife,you’regoingtoloveBeckyRuff’scolorfuldescriptionofhermultipleCauldronCrashes.Today’sexcessofInternet“match”websitesprovidessizzlingopportunitiesforrelationshipsofeveryflavor.Likeanywomenwithahealthyappetite,Ruffdecidestotastethemall.SheregalesthereaderwithherunpredictableKitchenCapersthatkeepmanifestingthesamefatalendingsyetleaveherfeelingfarfrombeingafemmefatale.(ISBN1-9789611-0-2,978-0-9789611-0-7)-$9.00+S&HWhyDon’tYouLoveMe?I’mtheBestChoice:RepairingHeartache,FindingtheRightMate&NotMakingtheSameMistakestheNextTime,byDebiDavis…Everyonehasaperfectmatewaitingforthemanditmaynotbethepersonyouaretryingtoholdontonow.Learnhowtomanifestthatperfectpartner…foryoubyclearlyidentifyingthequalitiesyou’relookingforandmakingsureyoushowtheworldatrueandhonestportraitofwhoyouare.(ISBN1-893302-91-1)$12.95+S&HTheCompassionateSurgeon,byJoopSchokker,M.D....Doyouorsomeoneyouloveneedanoperation?Scared?Don’tknowwheretoturnforadvice?LetDr.JoopSchokkerguideyouthroughtheprocessandanswersuchquestionsas:Whatshouldyouexpectbefore,duringandaftersurgery?Whatshouldyouaskof,andexpectfrom,yoursurgeon?Whatcangowrongandhowwillyoursurgeonfixit?Whenissurgeryunnecessary?Whatareyourchancesoffullrecovery?(ISBN0-963294-76-8)-$12.95+S&H

331

ExecutiveParenting:Risks&SolutionsfortheWorkingParent-Whatyoumaynotknow...butwillwishyoudid!,byDebiDavis&EllenSherman,Ph.D….HealthexpertDebiDavisandMarriageandFamilyCounselorDr.EllenShermanhavecombinedtheirknowledgeandexperiencetodeliveracomprehensivemanualforchild-rearinginthe21stcentury.(ISBN1-893302-93-8)-$19.95+S&HTheCourageToBeWhoIAm,byMary-MargarehtRose…Thisbookisrichwithteachingsandanecdotesdeliveredwithhumorandhumanness,byawomanwhofollowedherheartandlearnedtolistentoherinnervoice;intheprocess,transformingeveryobstacleintoanopportunitytotesthercouragetomanifesthertrueidentity.(1SBN1-893302-13-X)-$20.95+S&HTheMakingOfAMaster:TrackingYourSelf-Worth,byJeanetteO’Donnal…Asimpletrackingmethodforself-improvementthattakesthemysteryoutofdefiningyourgoals,makingaroadmapandtrackingyourprogress.Abookrichwithnuggetsofwisdomcouchedinanecdotesandinstructivedialogues.(ISBN1-893302-36-9)-$14.95+S&HFictionwithFlare:WaaaayOutThere!Diggertown,Oklahoma,byTukloNashoba…AdventuresofconstableClintMankillerandhisdeputy,ChadGhostWolf;JimBobandBubbaJohnson,GrandfatherGhostWolf,CassieSnodgrass,DocJones,JudgeJenkinsandtherestoftheDiggertown,OklahomabunchinthefirstofaseriesofBigFoot-Sasquatchtalltalespepperedwithlotsofgoodbellylaughsandjustasmuchfun.(ISBN1-893302-44-X)-$13.95+S&HTheArbuckleTreasureHunt,byTukloNashoba…ThesecondintheWAAAAYOUTTHEREseriesthattakesClintMankillerandhisdeputy,ChadGhostWolf,BubbaandtherestoftheDiggertownganghighupintotheArbuckleMountainsonahuntforburiedSpanishgold.Maps,hiddenchestsanddangerousWerewolvesareallpartoftheadventurethatevenmanagestoturnuptheoldmanwhooriginallyburiedthegold!Buckleupforsomemoregreatlaughsandlotsofcampfirefun.(ISBN1-893302-88-1$14.95+S&HDrifters:TheFinalTestament,VolumeOne,byMichaelSilverhawk…WithintheDRIFTERStrilogyisapowerfulsecret,akeythatunlocksourhumanpotential!Canoneman“makeadifference”notonlyinhisownlifebutforeveryoneelseontheplanet?Isitpossibleforasinglehumantotransformchaosintoorder,darknessintolight?(ISBN1-893302-57-1)-$22.95+S&HTickettoParadise,byYvonneRidley…JudithTempest,aBritishreporter,issearchingfortheTruth.ButwhenitstartstospilloutinherbrilliantfrontpagereportageofMiddleEastsuicidebombinginretaliationforIsraelitanksmowingdowninnocentPalestinianwomenandchildren,both‘Tempest’and‘Truth’starttospell‘Trouble’--withacapital‘T’,jokeherfriendsandcolleagues.Anon-stopmysterythrillerthattearsalongatarecklesspaceof

332

passion,betrayal,adventureandespionage.(ISBN1-893302-77-6)$17.95+S&HSynchronicityGates:AnAnthologyOfStoriesAndPoetryAboutPeopleTransformedInExtraordinaryRealityBeyondExperience,byStephenVernarelli…Aninventivecompilationofshortstoriesthattakethereaderbeyondmerescience,fiction,orfantasy.Vernarelliintroducesthereadertoanewperceptionofreality;heimaginesthebestandmakesitreal.(ISBN1-893302-38-5)-$17.95+S&HTheAlleyofWishes,byLaurelJohnson…DespitetheravagesofWWIonParisandontheyoungAmericanfarmboy,BeckSanow,anddespitetheabusiverelationshipthatthechanteuseCeriseendures,thetwoshareabondthatisunbreakablebytime,war,lossofmemory,lossoflifeandlossofyouth.BeckandCerisearebothgoodpeoplebesetbyconstanttragedy.Yetitistragedythatbringsthemtogether,anditisunconditionallovethatkeepsthemtogether.(ISBN1-893302-46-6)-$17.95+S&HFreedom:LettingGoOfAnxietyAndFearOfTheUnknown,byJimBritt…JeremyCarter,afiremanfromMissouriwhoisinNewYorkCityfortheday,decidestotakeatouroftheTradeCenter,onlytowatchinshock,theattackonitstwintowersfromablockaway.Afterwardashegazesatthepitofrubbleandtalkswithmanyofthesurvivors,Jeremystartstoexploretheinnerdepthsofhissoul,toaskquestionshe’dneveraskedbefore.Thisdialoguehelpshimlearnwhoheisandwhatittakestoovercomethefear,anger,griefandanxietythiskindoftragedybrings.(ISBN1-893302-74-1)-$18.95+S&HThePrinceMustDie,byGowerLeconfield…breaksalltaboosformysterythrillers.Afterthe"powersthatbe"suppressedthemanuscriptsofthreemajorBritishwriters,DandelionBooksbreaksthroughwithathrillerinvolvingaplottoassassinatePrinceCharles.ThePrinceMustDiebringstolifeaBritainoftodaythatisontheedgewithraceriots,neo-Nazis,hardrightbacklashandneo-punknihilists.Rivetingentertainment…youwon’tbeabletoputitdown.(ISBN1-893302-72-5)-$14.95+S&HComeasYouAre,bySarahDaniels…“Tongue-in-cheek”entertainmentatitswackiest—andmostsubtle.Ifanyoneeverdoubtedthatsexmakestheworldgoaround,authorSarahDanielswillputyourmind,andbodytotest.Non-stophumor,humannessandwisdomarebundledtogethertodeliveroneoflife’smostimportantunheededlessons:eachofushasauniquedestinytodiscover,anduntilwefindandembarkonthatdestiny,lifemaybeonebowlofcherrypitsafteranother.Adultlanguageandscenes.(ISBN1-893302-15-6)-$14.95+S&HUnfinishedBusiness,byElizabethLucasTaylor…LindsayMayerknowssomethingisamisswhenherhusband,Griffin,acollegeprofessor,startsspendingtoomuchtimeathisofficeandout-of-town.Shortlyaftertheuglytruthsurfaces,Griffindisappearsaltogether.Lindsayisshattered.LifewithoutGriffinislifewithoutlife…Oneofthesexiestbooksyou’lleverread!(ISBN1-893302-68-7)-$14.95+S&HTheWomanWithQualities,bySarahDaniels…SouthFloridaisn’texactlythePromisedLand

333

thatforty-nine-year-oldnewlywidowedKeriAndershadinmindwhenshetransplantedherselfherefromthenortheast…Atoughaction-packednovelthatisfarmorethanalovestory.(ISBN1-893302-11-3)-$14.95+S&HAdventureCapital,byJohnRushing…SouthFloridaadventure,crimeandviolenceinafictionstorybasedonatruelifeexperience.Abookyouwillnotwanttoputdownuntilyoureachthelastpage.(ISBN1-893302-08-3)$14.95+S&HAMother’sJourney:ToReleaseSorrowAndReapJoy,bySharonKay…ApoignantaccountofNorahAnnMason’slifejourneyasawife,motherandsingleparent.Thisbookwillhaveapowerfulimpactonanyone,femaleormale,whohasexperiencedparentalabuse,familyseparations,financialstrugglesandadesperateneedtofindthemagicinlifethatotherstalkaboutthatjustdoesn’tseemtobethereforthem.(ISBN1-893302-52-0)-$16.95+S&HReturnToMasada,byRobertG.Makin…InagrippingaccountofthefamousBattleofMasada,RobertG.Makinskillfullyrecapturesthebloodandgoreaswellasthespiritualessenceofthishistoricstruggleforfreedomandindependence.(ISBN1-893302-10-5)$18.95+S&HTimeOutOfMind,bySolaraVayanian…Atlantishadbecomeasnakepitofintrigueteemingwithfactiousgroupsvyingforpowerandcontrol.Anunforgettabledramathattellsofthebreakdownofthepriesthood,thehiddenscientificexperimentsingeneticengineeringwhichproduced"things"--parthumanandpartanimal--andotheratrocities;theinfiltrationbythedarklordsofOrion;andtheimplantationofthehumanbodywithadevicetofueltheOrionwars.(ISBN1-893302-21-0)$16.95+S&HTheThirteenthDisciple:TheLifeOfMaryMagdalene,byGordonThomas…TheclosestofJesus’followers,thenameofMaryMagdaleneconjuresimagesofawomanbothpassionateanddevoted,bothsinnerandsaint.Thefirstfull-lengthbiographyfor13centuries.(ISBN1-893302-17-2)$22.95+S&H

AlwaysAvailablethroughwww.amazon.com&OtherOnline&Brick&MortarBookstores!!

TOLL-FREEORDERS–1-800-861-7899(U.S.&CANADA)

334

http://www.amazon.com

Political Implications Of The Extraterrestrial Presence

Documents

Transcript of Political Implications Of The Extraterrestrial Presence