PCTOC yayın

12
This article was published in the above mentioned Springer issue. The material, including all portions thereof, is protected by copyright; all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science + Business Media. The material is for personal use only; commercial use is not permitted. Unauthorized reproduction, transfer and/or use may be a violation of criminal as well as civil law. ISSN 0167-6857, Volume 102, Number 3

Transcript of PCTOC yayın

This article was published in the above mentioned Springer issue.The material, including all portions thereof, is protected by copyright;all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science + Business Media.

The material is for personal use only;commercial use is not permitted.

Unauthorized reproduction, transfer and/or usemay be a violation of criminal as well as civil law.

ISSN 0167-6857, Volume 102, Number 3

ORIGINAL PAPER

Production of in vitro haploid plants from in situ induced haploidembryos in winter squash (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne ex Lam.)via irradiated pollen

Ertan Sait Kurtar • Ahmet Balkaya

Received: 18 November 2009 / Accepted: 1 March 2010 / Published online: 23 March 2010

� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Abstract The influence of pollen irradiation on the pro-

duction of in vitro haploid plants from in situ induced

haploid embryos was investigated in winter squash

(Cucurbita maxima Duchesne ex Lam.). Pollen were irra-

diated at different gamma-ray doses (50, 100, 200 and 300

Gray) and durations (9, 11, 15, 21, and 28 July). Production

of in vitro haploid plantlets was influenced by irradiation

dose, irradiation duration, genotype, and embryo type and

embryo stage. Embryos were only obtained from lower

irradiation doses (50 Gray and 100 Gray) and earlier irra-

diation durations (9, 11, and 15 July). The greatest embryo

number per fruit was procured from ‘‘G14’’ and ‘‘55SI06’’

genotypes at 50 Gray gamma-ray dose. Necrotic embryos

were higher than normal embryos at delayed harvest times

(5 and 6 weeks after the pollination). The convenient

harvest time for embryo rescue was observed about

4 weeks (between 25 and 30 days) after pollination. All

cotyledon and amorphous embryos had only diploid plants

while late-torpedo, arrow-tip, and pro-cotyledon embryos

produced 33.3, 50.0, and 66.7% haploid plant. The fre-

quency of haploid plantlets was 0.11, 1.17, 10.96 and 0.28

per 100 seeds, 100 embryos, 100 plantlets and a fruit at

50 Gray gamma-ray dose, respectively.

Keywords Irradiated pollen � In vitro haploidization �Winter squash (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne ex Lam.)

Introduction

In a conventional breeding programme, pure lines are

obtained after several generations of selfing and still may

not be 100% homozygous (Germana 2006). Haploidization

is the process of producing haploid plants in a single

generation. Following haploidization, the chromosome

number of haploid plants may be doubled (dihaploidiza-

tion) to obtain complete fertile homozygous lines. These

valuable lines are currently used for breeding programmes

and genetic research.

Haploid plants can be obtained spontaneously (andro-

genesis, gynogenesis, or parthenogenesis, semigamy and

polyembryony), but the frequency of haploid is very low

(Pochard and Dumas de Vaulx 1971; Lacadena 1974).

Recently, haploid plants are produced using in vitro

androgenesis (anther-microspore culture) and gynogenesis

(ovule-ovary culture), and in situ parthenogenesis (pollen

irradiation and treatment with chemicals, etc.).

Pollen irradiation (UV, gamma rays, and X-rays) is the

most widely used technique to induce in situ parthenoge-

netic haploid plants. Gamma rays are commonly used in

haploid programmes because of their simple application,

good penetration, reproducibility, high mutation frequency,

and low disposal (lethal) problems (Chahal and Gosal

2002). This technique was used firstly with embryo culture

on different species of Nicotiana (Pandey and Phung

1982).

Irradiated pollen can germinate on the stigma, grow

within the style and reach the embryo sac, but cannot

fertilize the egg-cell and the polar nuclei (Cuny 1992).

Genetically inactive but germinable pollen can be used to

stimulate the division of the egg cell, and thus induce

parthenogenesis or development of parthenocarpic fruit,

including gynogenic haploid production; overcoming

E. S. Kurtar (&)

High School of Profession of Bafra, Ondokuz Mayis University,

Bafra, Samsun, Turkey

e-mail: [email protected]

A. Balkaya

Horticulture Department of Agriculture Faculty, Ondokuz Mayis

University, Samsun, Turkey

123

Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2010) 102:267–277

DOI 10.1007/s11240-010-9729-1 Author's personal copy

minor cross-incompatibilities, and for physiological studies

of incompatibility (Stairs and Mergen 1964; Savaskan and

Toker 1991; Todorova et al. 2004), gene transformation

(Pandey 1978) and nucleus substitution (Raquin et al.

1989).

The irradiated pollen technique is an effective method

for the induction of haploid embryos in Cucurbit. Induction

of in situ haploid embryos and obtaining in vitro haploid

plants have been achieved using an irradiated pollen

technique in watermelon (Gursoz et al. 1991; Sari 1994),

melon (Sauton and Dumas de Vaulx 1987; Cuny 1992;

Maestro-Tejada 1992; Sari et al. 1992; Abak et al. 1996;

Lotfi et al. 2003), cucumber (Truong-Andre 1988;

Niemirowicz-Szczytt and Dumas de Vaulx 1989; Sauton

1989; Caglar and Abak 1999; Faris et al. 1999; Lotfi et al.

1999; Dolcet-Sanjuan et al. 2006), snake cucumber (Taner

et al. 2000), summer squash (Kurtar et al. 2002), and

pumpkin (Kurtar et al. 2009).

Winter squash is an annual cultivated species of

Cucurbit (Whitaker and Bemis 1964) and genetically dif-

ferent from Cucurbita pepo and Cucurbita moschata

(Athanasios et al. 2009). Cucurbita pepo shares a common

ancestor with C. moschata and C. argyrosperma, but not

with C. maxima (Decker-Walters et al. 1990). Isozyme

study showed high allelic diversity in C. pepo, C. mosch-

ata, and C. maxima (Heikal et al. 2008). To the authors’

knowledge, this is the first report on in vitro haploid pro-

duction in winter squash.

The objective of the present study was to determine the

effects of irradiation dose (Co60), irradiation duration,

genotype, embryo type and embryo stage on production of

in vitro haploid plants from in situ induced haploid

embryos in winter squash.

Materials and methods

Plant material

The experiment was carried out with six winter squash

genotypes (57SI06, 57SI21, 55BA02, 55BA03, 55CA06,

and G14) selected from four provinces (Samsun, Amasya,

Sinop and Bolu) of the Black Sea region of Turkey (genetic

material used in the project was funded by TUBITAK-

TOVAG -104O144), except ‘‘G14’’ genotype which was

provided by the Turkish Seed Gene Bank, Menemen, Izmir

(Fig. 1). The seeds were sown in plastic flats (cell volume

150 cm3 and 28 cells per flat) containing mixture of peat-

moss: perlite (2:1 v/v) on 20 April 2008. Seedlings were

raised in unheated glasshouse, and 15 seedlings from each

genotype were planted at 3–4 leaf stage with spacing of

3 9 3 m on 11 May.

Irradiation and pollination

Female flowers were isolated with white cloth bags

(15 9 10 cm) and male flowers were collected around

noon on the day before anthesis. Anthers without filaments

were excised and mixed equally for each genotype, and

placed into small cardboard boxes (5 9 7 9 2 cm). Sam-

ples were irradiated at 50, 100, 200 and 300 Gray doses of

gamma rays by a Co60 source of Theratron 780-C equip-

ment on the same day at 1,482 Ci source activity and

11.96 Gymin-1 dose rate. Irradiation experiments were

performed at different durations (9, 11, 15, 21, and 28 July)

to evaluate the effects of irradiation duration on embryo

induction. Irradiated anthers were incubated at room tem-

perature overnight. Female flowers were pollinated by

irradiated pollen in the morning of the following day at

0700–0900 hours. Pollen of flowers 0 days old (the day

following irradiation) and 1 day old were used for polli-

nation. Female flowers were then isolated with cloth bags

again to avoid undesired pollen contamination. Cloth bags

were removed at 3rd or 4th days of pollination.

Embryo culture

Immature fruits were harvested from 3 to 6 weeks after

pollination to determine the convenient harvest time.

Washed fruits were surface-sterilized in 2% sodium hypo-

chlorite solution for 30 min and then flame-sterilised using

ethanol. Prior to extraction, the laminar-flow hood was

disinfected with UV light for 15 min following 70% etha-

nol. Thereafter, seeds were extracted under axenic condi-

tions in a laminar-flow hood. Liquid medium culture (Lotfi

et al. 2003) and direct extraction methods were investigated

to embryo rescue. Embryos were rescued from 21- to 42-

day-old immature fruits and cultured in magenta boxes and

culture tubes containing solid E20A medium (Sauton and

Dumas de Vaulx 1987) (Table 1). Embryos were classified

according to embryo type and stage of embryo development

(Raghavan 1986; Kurtar et al. 2002), and cultured at

28 ± 1�C with 16-h photoperiod (3,000 lux) thereafter.

Transplantation and acclimatization

After 5–15 days of culture, mini-plantlets (having root and

shoot) were transferred onto fresh E20A medium for fur-

ther development, individually. Well-generated complete

plantlets (27–41 days old) were undergone acclimatization

process. First, the covers of magenta boxes and culture

tubes were gradually opened for 8–10 days. Plantlets were

removed and the roots were washed carefully in running

tap-water. The roots were then soaked for 10 min in 0.2%

solution of fungicide (Maxim XL035FS) to prevent pos-

sible contamination at the beginning of the acclimatization.

268 Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2010) 102:267–277

123

Author's personal copy

The plantlets were transplanted into plastic cups (150 cm3)

containing sterile peat-moss. Each cup was closed a

transparent cup and the plantlets were acclimatized in a

growth cabinet (Nuve TK120) at 28 ± 1�C with 16-h

photoperiod (6,000 lux) and 95% humidity. The transpar-

ent cups were opened gradually and completely removed at

6 days. The humidity of the growth cabinet was regulated

at intervals of 5% over a period of 2 days, until the

greenhouse or open field condition was reached.

Ploidy determination

The ploidy level of plantlets was determined by direct

(chromosome counting in root tip) and indirect (stomata

size, stomata density, and chloroplast number of the guard

cells) methods.

Chromosome counting in root tip was realised by

‘‘Feulgen technique’’ (Darlington and La Cour 1963). In

chromosome counting, root tips of plantlets were excised at

the beginning of acclimatization process. The 4th or 5th

leaves from shoot apex were used to measure stomata size

(width and length), stomata density (number of stoma per

mm2) and chloroplast number (each side of the guard cells)

(Sari 1994). In the measurements, lower epidermal strips of

leaves was placed onto a microscope slide after the addi-

tion of one drop of tap-water, and the cover glass was then

closed (Dore 1986). The sizes of 8 stomata per leaf were

measured for stomata size. 1% AgNO3 solution was used

for chloroplast counting (Rouselle 1992). Stomata density

and chloroplast number were counted in 6 visual areas.

Chromosomes and stomata were observed (40 910 mag-

nification) and photographed (100 910 magnification) by a

light microscope (Nikon, Alphapot, YS-2 model).

Statistical analysis

Responses to induction of in situ haploid embryos and

production of in vitro haploid plants are expressed as

Fig. 1 Representative fruits of investigated genotypes

Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2010) 102:267–277 269

123

Author's personal copy

percentage (%) due to unequal test materials. Statistical

analysis were only carried out in stomata measurements as

completely randomized experimental design including four

replications and the differences between means were

evaluated by using ANOVA test.

Results

Embryo induction

Only 50 Gray and 100 Gray gamma-ray doses and polli-

nation with 0-day-old pollen stimulated embryo induction.

Overall, 50 fruits, 7,071 seeds and 686 embryos were

obtained from the investigated genotypes, and mean

embryo number per fruit was 13.7. The highest fruit (29),

seed (4,981) and embryo number (673) were procured from

50 Gray gamma-ray dose (Table 2). Relatively higher

gamma-ray doses (200 and 300 Gray) were not effective on

embryo induction and gave fruits more or less but fruits

were seedless.

The total seed and embryo number showed varied

responses to different irradiation durations. At earlier

irradiation durations (9, 11, and 15 July) produced the

highest total seed (2,903, 2,979, and 855) and embryo

number (223, 318, and 122) whereas seed (216 and 118)

and embryo number (12 and 11) were the lowest at later

irradiation durations (21 and 28 July), sequentially. The

highest mean embryo number per fruit was recorded as

19.9 on 11 July. Mean seed and embryo number were

varied from genotypes, and the highest mean seed and

embryo number were 381 and 21.2 in ‘‘G14’’ while

55CA06 had the lowest mean seed and embryo number

(133 and 8.2), respectively.

Regeneration efficiency

Both normal (white) and necrotic embryos were rescued

and classified according to stages of embryo development

(Raghavan 1986; Kurtar et al. 2002) (Fig. 2). Liquid

medium culture (Lotfi et al. 2003) was found to be inef-

fective on embryo excising, and embryos were not visu-

alized and identified. Moreover, contamination was

observed and caused embryo loss.

Overall, 103 plantlets were regenerated from 686

embryos, and regeneration rate was 15.0%. The number of

necrotic embryos (379) was higher than normal embryos

(307), and regeneration rate were found 31.9% (95 plant-

lets) in normal and 2.1% (8 plantlets) in necrotic embryos.

Well-developed embryos (cotyledon) had higher regener-

ation rate than amorphous and at early developmental

stages embryos (pro-cotyledon, late-torpedo, and arrow-

tip). Despite globular and heart embryos did not regenerate

cotyledon embryos had the highest regeneration rate

(58.9%). Arrow-tip (31.3%) and late-torpedo (28.6%)

embryos also gave noteworthy results compared to pro-

cotyledon embryos (16.0%) (Table 3).

Frequency of haploid plantlets

Frequency of haploid plantlets was influenced from embryo

type and embryo stage, and all haploid plantlets were

obtained from normal embryos. Overall, 8 haploid plantlets

were regenerated from investigated genotypes (3 of

57SI06, 2 of G14, and 3 of 57SI21) at 50 Gray gamma-ray

dose. All cotyledon and amorphous embryos gave only

diploid plantlets, while late-torpedo, arrow-tip, and pro-

cotyledon embryos produced haploid plantlets with values

33.3, 50.0, and 66.7%, respectively (Table 4).

The frequency of haploid in per 100 plantlets was 8.00,

12.2, and 13.3 on 9, 11, and 15 July, respectively. Later

irradiation durations (21 and 28 July) had no effect on

embryo induction. Overall, the frequency of haploid

plantlets in per 100 seeds, 100 embryos, 100 plantlets, and

fruit was determined as 0.11, 1.17, 10.96, and 0.28 at 50

Gray dose, respectively (Table 5).

Ploidy determination

Chromosome counting

The results of chromosome counting on root tips of 73 plant-

lets (8 of arrow-tips, 6 of late-torpedo, 3 of pro-cotyledon,

Table 1 Composition of ‘‘E20A’’ medium

Macro and micro elements (mg l-1)

KNO3 1,075 MnSO4�7H2O 11.065

NH4 NO3 619 ZnSO4�7H2O 1.812

MgSO4�7H2O 206 H3 BO3 1.575

CaCl2�2H2O 156.5 KI 0.345

KH2PO4 71 Na2MgO4�2H2O 0.094

Ca(NO3)2�4H2O 25 CuSO4�5H2O 0.008

NaH2PO4�4H2O 19 CoCl2�6H2O 0.008

(NH4)2SO4 17 FeSO4�7H2O 27.8

KCl 3.5 Na2EDTA 37.3

Vitamins and amino acids (mg l-1) Others

Myo-inositol 50.300 Sucrose 20.00 g l-1

Pyridoxine–HCl 5.500 Agar 7.00 g l-1

Nicotinic acid 0.700 IAA 0.01 mg l-1

Thiamine–HCl 0.600 pH 5.90

Calcium pantothenate 0.500

Glycine 0.100

Biotine 0.005

270 Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2010) 102:267–277

123

Author's personal copy

Ta

ble

2F

ruit

nu

mb

er(F

),se

edn

um

ber

(S),

mea

nse

edn

um

ber

(MS),

emb

ryo

nu

mb

er(E

)an

dm

ean

emb

ryo

nu

mb

er(M

E)

ITID

Gen

oty

pes

Ov

eral

l

57

SI0

65

7S

I21

55

BA

02

55

BA

03

55

CA

06

G1

4

FS

MS

EM

EF

SM

SE

ME

FS

MS

EM

EF

SM

SE

ME

FS

MS

EM

EF

SM

SE

ME

FS

MS

EM

E

95

01

25

42

54

29

29

43

69

92

62

16

13

24

32

43

33

31

25

22

52

19

19

12

83

28

32

72

71

65

46

54

46

46

92

,13

62

37

21

62

4.0

10

01

13

81

38

00

31

35

45

10

.31

21

42

14

00

00

00

01

19

61

96

00

18

48

46

67

76

71

10

71

.0

R2

39

21

96

29

14

.57

50

47

26

39

.02

53

82

69

33

16

.51

25

22

52

19

19

.02

47

92

40

27

13

.52

73

83

69

52

26

.01

62

,90

31

81

22

31

3.9

11

50

26

38

31

96

93

4.5

21

46

73

36

18

15

21

52

14

24

22

17

99

09

14

5.5

11

83

18

32

22

21

51

85

18

52

52

92

,18

52

43

31

23

4.7

10

00

00

00

15

25

20

01

17

81

78

00

28

34

24

22

10

61

06

00

13

75

37

52

27

79

41

13

61

.1

R2

63

83

19

69

34

.53

19

89

93

61

2.0

26

99

35

04

22

1.0

42

62

66

95

23

.83

28

91

45

22

7.3

28

93

44

75

42

7.0

16

2,9

79

18

63

18

19

.9

15

50

11

09

10

93

23

22

11

75

86

33

1.5

19

79

71

91

91

10

71

07

88

00

00

00

00

00

54

30

86

12

22

4.4

10

01

97

97

00

12

82

80

00

00

00

00

00

01

27

27

00

12

73

27

30

04

42

51

06

00

R2

20

61

03

32

16

.03

14

54

86

32

1.0

19

79

71

91

9.0

11

07

10

78

8.0

12

72

70

01

27

32

73

00

98

55

95

12

21

3.6

21

50

13

83

82

21

27

27

77

15

95

93

30

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

31

24

43

12

4.0

10

00

00

00

13

93

90

00

00

00

15

35

30

00

00

00

00

00

02

92

46

00

R1

38

38

22

.02

66

33

73

.51

59

59

33

15

35

30

00

00

00

00

00

05

21

64

31

22

.4

28

50

00

00

02

64

32

11

5.5

14

24

20

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

31

06

35

11

3.7

10

00

00

00

11

21

20

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

01

12

12

00

R0

00

00

37

62

51

13

.71

42

42

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

04

11

83

01

12

.8

Ov

eral

l7

1,2

74

18

21

32

18

.91

89

89

55

18

01

0.0

71

,43

52

05

97

13

.97

67

49

61

22

17

.46

79

51

33

49

8.2

51

,90

43

81

10

62

1.2

50

7,0

71

14

16

86

13

.7

ITIr

rad

iati

on

tim

ein

July

,ID

irra

dia

tio

nd

ose

(Gra

y)

Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2010) 102:267–277 271

123

Author's personal copy

52 of cotyledon, and 4 of amorphous) indicated that ploidy

level changed with embryo stages. Haploid plantlets

(n = 20) were achieved from arrow-tip (4), late-torpedo

(2), and pro-cotyledon (2) embryos. All cotyledon and

amorphous embryos produced only diploid plantlets

(2n = 40).

Stomata observations

Diploid plants had 10 or 12 chloroplast in guard cells

whereas haploid plants had 6 or 8 chloroplast. Average

chloroplast number was counted 11.17 in diploids and 7.21

in haploids. Besides, average stomata length and width

Fig. 2 Some of the different stages of embryos: a,b globular; c,d heart; e arrow-tip; f,g late-torpedo; h,i pro-cotyledon; j,k cotyledon; l,mamorphous; n,o necrotic

272 Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2010) 102:267–277

123

Author's personal copy

were 30.51 and 21.11 lm in diploids, and 21.82 and

17.37 lm in haploids, respectively. While diploid plants

had larger stomata than haploids, haploid plants had higher

stomata density (428.6) than diploids (311.4) (Table 6;

Fig. 3).

Discussion

Embryo induction was achieved only with 50 and 100 Gray

gamma-ray doses and pollination with 0-day-old pollen.

The best result was obtained from 50 Gray gamma-ray

Table 3 Effects of embryo type (ET) and embryo stage (ES) on regeneration rate (R) (%)

ET ES ID Genotypes

57SI06 57SI21 55BA02 55BA03 55CA06 G14 R

E P E P E P E P E P E P E P R

N G 50 6 0 11 0 4 0 6 0 1 0 11 0 39 0 0

100 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0

H 50 10 0 7 0 4 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 37 0 0

100 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0

A 50 7 3 8 2 7 1 4 2 2 1 4 0 32 10 31.3

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LT 50 3 0 8 1 4 1 8 2 3 1 2 1 28 8 28.6

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PC 50 7 2 5 1 2 0 6 1 1 0 4 0 25 4 16

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

C 50 20 13 33 21 13 7 23 13 7 4 16 9 112 66 58.9

100 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 5 2 40

AM 50 2 0 8 1 6 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 23 5 21.7

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NE G 50 13 0 13 0 7 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 48 0 0

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

H 50 11 0 14 0 4 0 8 0 1 0 11 0 49 0 0

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

A 50 11 0 13 0 11 0 8 0 5 0 5 0 53 0 0

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LT 50 5 0 9 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 34 0 0

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PC 50 5 0 7 0 3 0 8 0 2 0 5 0 30 0 0

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

C 50 20 2 32 1 17 1 26 1 8 0 22 2 122 7 5.7

100 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

AM 50 8 0 12 1 6 0 6 0 2 0 4 0 38 1 2.6

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RN 50 55 20 80 26 40 10 57 19 20 7 44 11 296 93 31.4

100 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 11 2 18.2

RNE 50 73 2 100 2 55 1 65 1 27 0 57 2 377 8 2.1

100 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

R 50 128 22 180 28 95 11 122 20 47 7 101 13 673 101 15

100 5 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 1 13 2 15.4

Overall 133 2 181 28 96 11 123 20 47 7 106 14 686 103 15

ID Irradiation dose (Gray), E embryo number, P plantlet number, G globular, H heart, A arrow-tip, LT late-torpedo, PC pro-cotyledon, Ccotyledon, AM Amorphous, N normal, NE necrotic

Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2010) 102:267–277 273

123

Author's personal copy

dose, and embryo induction was not performed at 200 and

300 Gray doses. Embryos and haploid plants were also

obtained from lower irradiation doses (25 and 50 Gray) in

summer squash (Kurtar et al. 2002) and in pumpkin (50 and

100 Gray) (Kurtar et al. 2009). On the other hand, haploid

embryo induction was obtained at relatively higher doses

(200–300 Gray) in watermelon (Gursoz et al. 1991; Sari

et al. 1994), melon (Sauton and Dumas de Vaulx 1987;

Cuny 1992; Maestro-Tejada 1992; Sari et al. 1992; Abak

et al. 1996; Lotfi et al. 2003), cucumber (Niemirowicz-

Szczytt and Dumas de Vaulx 1989; Sauton 1989; Caglar

and Abak 1999), and snake cucumber (Taner et al. 2000).

Contrary to these reports, the best irradiation dose was

found 100 Gray (Faris et al. 1999; Lotfi et al. 1999), 150

Gray (Xie et al. 2005), and 500 Gray (Dolcet-Sanjuan et al.

2006) in cucumber, and 750 Gray in melon (Sun et al.

2006).

These results may be attributed to the radio-resistance of

pollen and also to biologic efficiency of irradiation. A

linear relationship between radio-resistance and pollen

size, which is also a function of the amount of DNA in the

nucleus has been reported (Brewbaker and Emery 1962;

Alison and Casareft 1968; Shridhar 1992; Jain et al. 1996).

Pollen of winter squash are one of the largest pollen (as in

squash and pumpkin) in vegetables (average width

180 lm). Melon, watermelon, and cucumber pollen are

smaller than winter squash (average 50, 60 and 65 lm,

respectively) (Sensoy et al. 2003). Moreover, melon,

watermelon and cucumber have 3 apertures, whereas

winter squash has 12 apertures. Hence, winter squash

pollen are more sensitive to dehydration and rapid loss of

their viability as reported in squash (Nepi and Pacini 1993).

Pollen viability, germination ability and fruit and seed-

set also decreased along with increasing of irradiation dose,

irradiation duration and pollen age in pumpkin and winter

squash (Kurtar 2009).

Biologic efficiency of irradiation relates to the source

activity (Ci) and dose rate (Gymin-1) (Ozalpan 2001).

Irradiation efficiency influences from oxygen and water

contents of tissue (Bernstein et al. 1993), division volume

of cell (Tokarek et al. 1994) and also type of radiation

(Goldschmidt et al. 1994). Although the same irradiation

procedure was followed in our previous work, the best

result was obtained from 25 to 50 Gray gamma ray doses in

summer squash (Kurtar et al. 2002). Irradiation treatments

were realised at 6,313 Ci source activity and 44.64

Gymin-1 dose rate in summer squash while these values

were 1,482 Ci and 11.96 Gymin-1 in the present study,

respectively. Based on this concept, source activity (Ci),

dose rate (Gymin-1), pollen characteristics (size, sensitiv-

ity condition of dehydration) and irradiation and

Table 4 Effects of embryo type (ET) and embryo stage (ES) on

haploid plantlet number (HN) and haploid plantlet rate (HR) (%)

ET ES E P IP HN HR (%)

N G 43 0 0 0 0.0

H 39 0 0 0 0.0

A 32 10 8 4 50.0

LT 28 8 6 2 33.3

PC 25 4 3 2 66.7

C 117 68 49 0 0.0

AM 23 5 4 0 0.0

NE G 48 0 0 0 0.0

H 49 0 0 0 0.0

A 53 0 0 0 0.0

LT 34 0 0 0 0.0

PC 30 0 0 0 0.0

C 124 7 3 0 0.0

AM 38 1 0 0 0.0

RN 307 95 73 8 10.96

RNE 379 8 0 0 0.0

E Embryo number, P plant number, IP investigated plant number,

G globular, H heart, A arrow-tip, LT late-torpedo, PC pro-cotyledon,

C cotyledon, AM amorphous, N normal, NE necrotic

Table 5 Frequency of haploid production

IT ID HP S E IP F 100

seeds

100

embryos

100

plantlets

Per

fruit

9 50 2 2,136 216 25 9 0.09 0.93 8 0.22

100 0 767 7 0 7 0 0 0 0

11 50 4 2,185 312 33 9 0.18 1.28 12.2 0.44

100 0 794 6 0 7 0 0 0 0

15 50 2 430 122 15 5 0.47 1.64 13.3 0.4

100 0 425 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

21 50 0 124 12 0 3 0 0 0 0

100 0 92 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

28 50 0 106 11 0 3 0 0 0 0

100 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

R 50 8 4,981 673 73 29 0.16 1.19 10.96 0.28

100 0 2,090 13 0 21 0 0 0 0

Overall 8 7,071 686 73 50 0.11 1.17 10.96 0.28

IT Irradiation time in July, ID irradiation dose (Gray), HP haploid

plant number, S seed number, E embryo number, IP investigated plant

number, F fruit number

Table 6 Stomata dimension and density of haploid and diploid plants

SL SW SD CN

Haploid 21.82 b 17.37 b 428.6 a 7.21 b

Diploid 30.51 a 21.11 a 311.4 b 11.17 a

Means followed by the same letter in the same column are not sig-

nificantly different

SL (lm) Stomata length, SW (lm) stomata width, SD (number/per

mm2) stomata density, CN chloroplast number

274 Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2010) 102:267–277

123

Author's personal copy

pollination details (time from collection to irradiation and

incubation and storage conditions of anthers) must be

clarified in irradiation experiments like this.

Embryo induction (number/per fruit) was achieved from

all investigated genotypes and varied in the range of 3.5–

52.0. Genotype specificity was observed, but the general

reaction of the genotypes was low. When comparing the

average values, ‘‘G14’’ (21.2) demonstrated good response.

Data presented in this paper confirm the relationship

between embryo induction and genotype that has been

previously demonstrated for cucumber (Sauton 1989; Faris

et al. 1999), summer squash (Kurtar et al. 2002) and

pumpkin (Kurtar et al. 2009). Genotypic effect can be

explained by the responsiveness of parthenogenesis

(Pandey and Phung 1982) or lower parthenocarpic response

(Sauton 1989; Faris et al. 1999). Moreover, embryo yield

was highly influenced by different factors such as irradia-

tion dose, irradiation duration, and genotype (Brewbaker

and Emery 1962; Niemirowicz-Szczytt and Dumas de

Vaulx 1989; Sauton 1989; Sari et al. 1992, 1994;

Ficcadenti et al. 1995; Abak et al. 1996; Caglar and Abak

1999; Kurtar et al. 2002, 2009).

Overall, 686 embryos were rescued and the number of

necrotic embryos (379) was higher than normal embryos

(307) due to delayed harvest times (5 and 6 weeks). A total

of 103 plantlets were regenerated from 686 embryos, and

the regeneration rate was 15.0%. The greatest number of

plantlets (95 plantlets) were regenerated from normal

embryos. Regeneration rate changed with embryo type and

embryo stage. Globular and heart embryos were not

regenerated, and the greatest regeneration rate was

observed in cotyledon embryos (58.9%). Regeneration rate

was determined 31.3% in arrow-tip, 28.6% in late-torpedo,

and 16.0% in pro-cotyledon embryos. Regeneration rate

was reported 12.0% in arrow-tip, 31.3% in torpedo, 44.4%

in heart, and 31.3% in cotyledon embryos in summer

squash (Kurtar et al. 2002). On the other hand, cotyledon

embryos had the highest regeneration rate (66.7%), and

torpedo (45.5%), heart (44.0%) and arrow-tip (41.7%)

embryos also gave better results in pumpkin (Kurtar et al.

2009). Regeneration rate was 80% in heart embryos and

20% in globular embryos in melon (Sari et al. 1999b).

28.1% of globular, 55.0% of heart, 80% of torpedo, and

81.8% of cotyledon type embryos were regenerated in

cucumber (Caglar and Abak 1999). However, Faris et al.

(1999) found relatively lower regeneration efficiency (3.3–

7.7%) in cucumber. The success of embryo rescue depends

on the stage of embryo development and composition of

culture media (Jaskani et al. 2005). Different culture media

and several subcultures may be used for increasing

regeneration efficiency (Ondrej et al. 2002).

Embryo rescue is a very laborious and tedious process in

winter squash. Opening 100 seeds within a fruit takes

approximately 70–80 min. Therefore, liquid medium cul-

ture (Lotfi et al. 2003) was investigated to facilitate embryo

rescue. This procedure appeared simple and convenient,

but it was found to be ineffective in winter squash.

Embryos were not visualized and identified because of

having the thick seed-coat. Moreover, contamination was

occurred in magenta boxes excessively and led to embryo

loss. In a solution, X-ray technique can also be used for

identification of embryos (Savin et al. 1988; Sauton 1989).

But this technique requires specific equipment which is not

available in many laboratories.

The frequency of haploid plantlets was the highest at

earlier harvest times (3rd and 4th week), because of later

harvest times (5th and 6th week) led to a greater number of

necrotic embryos (Renata and Visser 1987; De Witte 2000;

Taner et al. 2000). Overall, 8 haploid plants were regen-

erated from arrow-tip (4), late-torpedo (2) and pro-cotyle-

don (2) embryos. The frequency of haploid plantlets was

0.11, 1.17, 10.96 and 0.28 per 100 seeds, 100 embryos, 100

plantlets and fruit, respectively. Frequency of haploid

plantlets was found per 100 seeds, 100 embryos and fruit

1.2, 10.4 and 0.7 in summer squash (Kurtar 1999), and

0.24, 0.94 and 0.33 in pumpkin (Kurtar et al. 2009),

respectively. Low frequency of haploid (range 0.11–0.36)

was also reported in cucumber (Caglar and Abak 1999).

Fig. 3 Stomata dimension and chloroplast number in guard cells: haploid (a), diploid (b)

Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2010) 102:267–277 275

123

Author's personal copy

Stomata size, stomata density, chloroplast number and

chromosome number in root tip were different from hap-

loid to diploid plants. Measurement of stoma and chloro-

plast counting was simple and more practical than

chromosome counting. These results indicated that stomata

observations can be used successfully to determine the

ploidy in winter squash. Abak et al. (1996) in melon, Sari

et al. (1999a) in watermelon, Kurtar et al. (2002) in sum-

mer squash and Kurtar et al. (2009) in pumpkin reported

similar results. Flow-cytometry can be used a potential

method to determine the ploidy level, but it is expensive,

labour-intensive and requires specific equipment (Sari et al.

1999a). Besides, no convenient method for flow-cytometry

has been found by many researchers working on haploid/

dihaploid production (Lim and Earle 2009) because many

plants scored as diploid by flow-cytometry do not produce

pollen or fruit-set in vivo (Lim and Earle 2008). This may

be explained by genetic modification of plants (especially

polyploidy, aneuploidy, euploidy and mixopoidy) in tissue

culture (Berlyn et al. 1986). Aneuploid plants were also

reported in cucumber (Truong-Andre 1988; Niemirowicz-

Szczytt and Dumas de Vaulx 1989) and in melon (Ezura

and Oosawa 1994). Considering these findings, in addition

to chromosome counting and stomata observations, mor-

phological observation (checking of flowers and pollen,

fruit-set and growth characteristics, etc.) seems to be nec-

essary to determine the ploidy level in winter squash.

However, morphological observations are time consuming,

as it requires plant development to reach an appropriate

stage.

Although our results indicated low frequency of haploid

plantlets, this is the first report on induction of partheno-

genetic haploid embryo via irradiated pollen technique in

winter squash. Low frequency of haploid may be explained

by the greatest number of necrotic embryos (due to delayed

harvest times), absence of regeneration (globular and heart

embryos were not regenerate) and spontaneous diploidi-

zation. Spontaneous diploidization has also been reported

for root meristems of cucumber (Sauton 1989) and melon

(Sauton 1988; Lotfi et al. 2003).

In conclusion, the irradiated pollen technique is pro-

posed to induce embryos and obtain haploid plantlets in

winter squash. However, in order to evaluate the irradiated

pollen approach for the recovery of haploid plants in winter

squash, further research should be based on appropriate

irradiation doses, irradiation durations, genotypes, culture

media and culture conditions, and also acclimatization

processes.

Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge the support of the

Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUB_ITAK

Project No: TOVAG 108 O 390) and partial funding by the Voca-

tional School of Bafra, Ondokuz Mayis University in Turkey.

References

Abak K, Sari N, Paksoy M, Yılmaz H, Aktas H, Tunalı C (1996)

Genotype response to haploid embryo induction with pollination

by irradiated pollen in melon, obtaining of dihaploid lines,

determination of haploid plants by different techniques. Turk J

Agric For 20:425–430

Alison A, Casareft P (1968) Radiation biology. United States Atomic

Energy Commission, Washington, DC

Athanasios LT, Koutita O, Anastasiadou A (2009) Description and

analysis of genetic diversity among squash accessions. Braz

Arch Biol Technol 52:271–283

Berlyn GP, Beck RC, Renfroe MH (1986) Tissue culture and the

propagation and genetic improvement of conifers: problems and

possibilities. Tree Physiol 1:227–240

Bernstein EF, Sullivan FJ, Mitchel JB (1993) Biology of chronic

radiation effect on tissues and wound healing. Clin Plast Surg

20:435–453

Brewbaker JL, Emery GC (1962) Pollen radiobotany. Radiat Bot

1:101–154

Caglar G, Abak K (1999) Obtention of in vitro haploid plants from in

situ induced haploid embryos in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).

Turk J Agric For 23:283–290

Chahal GS, Gosal SS (2002) Principles and procedures of plant

breeding. Alpha Science, Oxford

Cuny F (1992) Processus d’induction d’embryons haploides par du

pollen irradie chez le melon (Cucumis melo L.) responses du

pollen a l’irradiation gamma. These de Docteur, Universite

d’Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse, Avignon

Darlington CD, La Cour LF (1963) Methoden der chromosome-

nuntersuchungten. Keller, Stuttgart

De Witte K (2000) Review of research at fruitteeltcentrum on the

production of homozygous plants through androgenesis in vitro

and parthenogenesis in situ. Acta Hort 520:135–148

Decker-Walters DS, Walters TW, Posluszny U (1990) Genealogy and

gene flow among annual and domesticated species of Cucurbita.

Can J Bot 68:782–789

Dolcet-Sanjuan R, Claveria E, Garcia-Mas J (2006) Cucumber

(Cucumis sativus L.) dihaploid line production using in vitro

rescue of in vivo induced parthenogenic embryos. Acta Hort

725:837–844

Dore C (1986) Evaluation du niveau de ploidie des plantes d’une

population de choux de Bruxelles (Brassica oleracea L. ssp.

gemmifera) d’origine pollinique. Agronomie 6:797–801

Ezura H, Oosawa K (1994) Ploidy of somatic embryos and the ability

to regenerate plantlets in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Plant Cell

Rep 14:107–111

Faris NM, Nikolova V, Niemirowicz-Szczytt K (1999) The effect of

gamma irradiation dose on cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

haploid embryo production. Acta Phys Plant 21:301–396

Ficcadenti N, Veronese P, Sestili S, Crino P, Lucretti S, Schiavi M,

Saccardo F (1995) Influence of genotype on the induction of

haploidy in Cucumis melo L. by using irradiated pollen. J Genet

Breed 49:359–364

Germana MA (2006) Doubled haploid production in fruit crops. Plant

Cell Tiss Organ Cult 86:131–146

Goldschmidt H, Breneman JC, Breneman DL (1994) Ionizing

radiation therapy in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol

30:157–182

Gursoz N, Abak K, Pitrat M, Rode JC, Dumas de Vaulx R (1991) Obten-

tion of haploid plants induced by irradiated pollen in watermelon

(Citrullus lanatus). Cucurbit Genetic Coop 14:109–110

Heikal AH, Abdel-Razzak HS, Hafez EE (2008) Assessment of

genetic relationships among and within cucurbita species using

RAPD and ISSR markers. J App Sci Res 4:515–525

276 Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2010) 102:267–277

123

Author's personal copy

Jain SM, Sopory SK, Veilleux RE (1996) In vitro haploid production

in higher plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht

Jaskani MJ, Khan IA, Khan MM (2005) Fruit set, seed development

and embryo germination in interploid crosses of citrus. Scientia

Hort 107:51–57

Kurtar ES (1999) Research on the effects of genotypes and growing

seasons on in situ haploid embryo induction and in vitro plant

obtention via irradiated pollen in squash. PhD Thesis, University

of Cukurova

Kurtar ES (2009) Influence of gamma irradiation on pollen viability,

germinability and fruit and seed-set of pumpkin and winter

squash. Afr J Bio 8:6918–6926

Kurtar ES, Sari N, Abak K (2002) Obtention of haploid embryos and

plants through irradiated pollen technique in squash (Cucurbitapepo L.). Euphytica 127:335–344

Kurtar ES, Balkaya A, Ozbakır M, Ofluoglu T (2009) Induction of

haploid embryo and plant regeneration via irradiated pollen

technique in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne ex. Poir).

Afr J Bio 8:5944–5951

Lacadena JR (1974) Spontaneous and induced parthenogenesis and

androgenesis. In: Kasha KJ (ed) Haploids in higher plants—

advances and potential. University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada,

pp 13–32

Lim W, Earle ED (2008) Effect of in vitro and in vivo colchicine

treatments on pollen production and fruit recovery on melon

plants obtained after pollination with irradiated pollen. Plant Cell

Rep 95:115–124

Lim W, Earle ED (2009) Enhanced recovery of doubled haploid lines

from parthenogenetic plants of melon (Cucumis melo L.). Plant

Cell Rep 98:351–356

Lotfi M, Kashi A, Onsinejad R (1999) Induction of parthenogenetic

embryos by irradiated pollen in cucumber. Acta Hort 492:323–

328

Lotfi M, Alan AR, Henning MJ, Jahn MM, Earle ED (2003)

Production of haploid and doubled haploid plants of melon

(Cucumis melo L.) for use in breeding for multiple virus

resistance. Plant Cell Rep 21:1121–1128

Maestro-Tejada MC (1992) Resistance du melon aux virus. Interac-

tion avec les pucerons vecteurs. Analyse genetique sur les

lignees haplodiploides. These de Docteur, Universite de Droit,

d’Economie et des Sciences d’Aix-Marseille

Nepi M, Pacini E (1993) Pollination, pollen viability and pistil

receptivity in Cucurbita pepo. Ann Bot 72:527–536

Niemirowicz-Szczytt K, Dumas de Vaulx R (1989) Preliminary data

on haploid cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) induction. Cucurbit

Genetics Coop 12:24–25

Ondrej V, Navratilova B, Lebeda A (2002) In vitro cultivation of

Cucumis sativus ovules after fertilization. Acta Hort 588:339–343

Ozalpan A (2001) Temel Radyobiyoloji. Halic University Press,

Cambridge

Pandey KK (1978) Gametic gene transfer in Nicotiana by means of

irradiated pollen. Genetica 49:53–69

Pandey KK, Phung M (1982) Hertwig effect in plants: induced

parthenogenesis through the use of irradiated pollen. Theor Appl

Genet 62:295–300

Pochard E, Dumas de Vaulx R (1971) La monoploidie chez le piment

(Capsicum annuum L.). Z Pflanzenzuchtg 65:23–46

Raghavan V (1986) Embryogenesis in angiosperms: a developmental

and experimental study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Raquin C, Cornu A, Farcy E, Maizonnier D, Pelletier G, Vedel F

(1989) Nucleus substitution between Petunia species using

gamma ray-induced androgenesis. Theor Appl Genet 78:337–

341

Renata S, Visser T (1987) Embryo development and fruit set in pear

induced by untreated and irradiated polen. Euphytica 36:287–

294

Rouselle F (1992) Techniques d’estimation nombre de chloroplastes.

In: Jahier J et al (eds) Techniques de Cytogenetique Vegetale.

INRA , Paris

Sari N (1994) Effect of genotype and season on the obtention of

haploid plants by irradiated pollen in watermelon and alterna-

tives to the irradiation. PhD Thesis, University of Cukurova

Sari N, Abak K, Pitrat M, Dumas de Vaulx R (1992) Induction of

parthenogenetic haploid embryos and plant obtention in melon

(Cucumis melo L. var. inodorus Naud ve C. melo L. var.

reticulatus Naud). Trans J Agric For 16:302–314

Sari N, Abak K, Pitrat M, Rode JC, Dumas de Vaulx R (1994)

Induction of parthenogenetic haploid embryos after pollination

by irradiated pollen in watermelon. HortScience 29:1189–1190

Sari N, Abak K, Pitrat M (1999a) Comparison of ploidy level

screening methods in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)

Matsum. and Nakai). Scientia Hort 82:265–277

Sari N, Ekiz H, Yucel S, Yetisir H, Ekbic H, Abak K (1999b)

Investigation of new protected cultivation melon lines resistant

to Fusarium oxysporium f.sp. melonis using dihaplodization.

Turkey IIIrd National Horticultural Congress, 14–17 September

1999, Ankara, pp 498–503

Sauton A (1988) Effect of season and genotype on gynogenetic haploid

production in muskmelon, Cucumis melo L. Sci Hort 35:71–75

Sauton A (1989) Haploid gynogenesis in Cucumis sativus induced by

irradiated pollen. Cucurbit Genetics Coop 12:22–23

Sauton A, Dumas De Vaulx R (1987) Obtention de plantes haploides

chez le melon (Cucumis melo L.) par gynogenese induite par du

pollen irradie. Agronomie 7:141–148

Savaskan C, Toker MC (1991) The effects of various doses of gamma

irradiation on the seed germination and root tips chromosomes of

rye (Secale cereale L.). Trans J Bot 15:349–359

Savin F, Decomble V, Le Couviour M, Hallard J (1988) The X-ray

detection of haploid embryos arisen in muskmelon (Cucumis meloL.) seeds, and resulting from a parthenogenetic development

induced by irradiated pollen. Cucurbit Genetics Coop 11:39–42

Sensoy AS, Ercan N, Ayar F, Temirkaynak M (2003) Determination

of some morphologic characteristics and viability of some

vegetable crops in Cucurbitaceae family. J Agric Fac Akdeniz

Univ 16:1–6

Shridhar (1992) Pollen grains of cultivated Cucurbits. In: Proceedings

of the 5th Eucarpia Cucurbitaceae Symp, July 27–31, Warsaw,

Poland, 28–33

Stairs GR, Mergen F (1964) Potential uses of irradiated pollen in

forest genetics. In: Proceedings of the 11th northeastern forest

tree improved conference, pp 38–41

Sun Y, Mei S, Peng J, Zhang L, Nie Q, Zeng H, Du N (2006) Induced

haploid plants after pollination by irradiated pollen in Cucumismelo L. Hubei Agr Sci 4:98–100

Taner KY, Yanmaz R, Kunter B (2000) The effects of irradiation dose

and harvest period on haploid plant formation via irradiated

pollen in snake cucumber (Cucumis melo var. flexuosus Naud.).

IIIrd National Vegetable Culture Symp, Isparta-Turkey, 177–181

Todorova M, Ivanov P, Ninova N, Encheva J (2004) Effect of female

genotype on the efficiency of induced perthenogenesis in

sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Hella 27:67–74

Tokarek R, Bernstein EF, Sullivan F (1994) Effect of therapeutic

radiation on wound healing. Clin Dermatol 12:57–70

Truong-Andre I (1988) In vitro haploid plants derived from pollin-

isation by irradiated pollen on cucumber. In: Proceedings of the

Eucarpia meeting on cucurbit genetics and breeding. May 31–

June 2, Avignon-Montfavet, pp 143–144

Whitaker TW, Bemis WP (1964) Evolution in the genus. Cucurbita.

Evolution 18:553–559

Xie M, Zhao J, Pan J, He H, Wu A, Cai R (2005) Induced haploid

plants after pollination by irradiated pollen in Cucumis sativus L.

J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Agr Sci) 2:45–49

Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult (2010) 102:267–277 277

123

Author's personal copy