Links Between Corruption and Conflict
-
Upload
uni-plovdiv -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
0
Transcript of Links Between Corruption and Conflict
1 | P a g e
What impact does corruption have on conflict? Have international
attempts to fight corruption in post-conflict settings been successful?
By Dimitar Panchev1
1 © 2015 Dimitar Panchev, e-mail : [email protected]
Terms and Conditions for the use of this article: This article may be
used for research and private study purposes. Any considerable or
methodical reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is definitively
prohibited.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any
representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up-to-
date. The accuracy of any information should be independently verified
with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,
actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or
arising out of the use of this material.
2 | P a g e
Abstract
In the past two decades, the problem of corruption has attracted considerable attention and
has had a significant influence on how intervention strategies in post-war countries are
devised. The aim of this paper will be to outline some of the conceptual problems associated
with defining corruption, its links to conflicts and the impact which international efforts have
had on fighting corruption in post-war societies.
3 | P a g e
Contents
Abstract ............................................................................................................. 2
Contents ............................................................................................................. 3
Introduction ....................................................................................................... 4
Problems associated with corruption.................................................................. 4
The impact of corruption on conflict and the peace-building process ............... 5
The effectiveness of intervention ...................................................................... 7
Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 8
Bibliography ...................................................................................................... 9
4 | P a g e
What impact does corruption have on conflict? Have international attempts to fight
corruption in post-conflict settings been successful?
Introduction
In the past two decades, the problem of corruption has attracted considerable attention and
has had a significant influence on how intervention strategies in post-war countries are
devised. The aim of this paper will be to provide an analysis of the complex relationship
which exists between corruption, conflict and the subsequent peace-building process in
countries emerging from conflicts.
To begin with, there are several conceptual problems associated with how corruption is
defined and understood – even in countries, where no violent conflicts have taken place, it
could require an enormous endeavour in order to pin point exactly what corruption should
stand for (Heidenheimer and Johnston, 2002: 161). Therefore, a good starting point would be
the most widely used definition of corruption: ‘Behaviour which deviates from the formal
duties of a public role because of private regarding (personal, close family, private clique)
pecuniary or status gains’ (Nye, 1967: 419).
However, when this definition is applied to countries emerging from war, two significant
problems arise (Harvey, 2012, online). To begin with, the above mentioned definition
constraints the appearance of corruption only to a particular segment of the population,
namely those individuals who occupy a position within a public office, thus failing to
acknowledge that corruption could in fact occur even when such a role is non-existent (Philp,
2008: 311). At the same time, however, this definition is also problematic because it fails to
draw a boundary between corruption and similar phenomena, thereby stretching the concept
and making it too broad (Harvey, 2012, online).
Because of these conceptual problems, for the purposes of the present study an alternative
definition of corruption will be employed: ‘the abuse of entrusted power for private gain’
(Transparency International, 2009: p. x).
Problems associated with corruption
Over the past two decades, increasing efforts on behalf of the international community, many
governments, and civil society organizations have focused attention on the persistent problem
of corruption in transitional economies, as well as in developing and industrialized states,
5 | P a g e
blaming it for slowed economic growth and deterioration in the quality of public service
delivery (Spector, 2008c: 1). Although many have struggled to design effective anti-
corruption strategies, without a doubt, the once so-called ‘conspiracy of silence’ (Andreski,
1978:347, in Leenders, 2012: 6) has been transformed. The recent interest academic interest
in corruption evolved out of concerns that in many less developed countries, efforts to boost
‘modernization’ or ‘development’ – re-packaged and made pertinent by the World Bank and
the IMF’s ‘structural adjustment programme’ – had failed to deliver (Leenders, 2012: 6).
Against this background, it has increasingly been asserted that corruption raises serious
obstacles to economic growth and associated ‘good governance’, and that the phenomenon
constitutes a drain on emerging economies (Lambsdorff, 2005: 8).
In addition to that, it has been documented that in the cases of developing countries where
corruption practices have been noted, this has discouraged foreign investment, thereby
slowing down and even inhibiting economic growth (ibid.: 4-7). Parallel to that, the existence
of corruption practices has been positively associated with the flourishing of shadow
economies and grey markets, thus depraving the state of any revenue collected in the form of
taxes (Spector, 2008b: 5). Next, the widespread use of corruption practices not only
undermines any efforts to reduce poverty and social exclusion, but also leads to the
disproportionate accumulation of wealth in certain social segments (Li et al. 2000: 155). In
addition, corrupt governments lack political legitimacy (Anderson and Tverdova, 2003: 91)
and undermine the rule of law, thus leading to lack of confidence on behalf of the general
public, which in itself can facilitate violence. Having outlined some of the problems
associated with corruption in post-conflict states, the next section of this paper will draw
attention to the relationship which exists between corruption and conflicts.
The impact of corruption on conflict and the peace-building process
Boucher et al. (2007: 4-5) notes that there exists a consensus as to the links between
corruption and conflict; the general measures needed to control corruption and the general
measures needed to control corruption in post-conflict settings. Here, it should be noted that
corruption in some cases could potentially have a positive impact in the early stages of post-
war transition and contribute to the peacekeeping process. But as Le Billon warns,
‘corruption always has debilitating long-term effects and thus cannot play a part in building
sustainable peace’ (2003: 8-9). Therefore it is of crucial importance that a comprehensive
anti-corruption strategy is devised and implemented in the early stages of the transition
towards more stable governance.
6 | P a g e
In countries emerging from war conflicts, where legitimacy and the bureaucratic apparatus is
yet to be restored, ‘public office’ is usually tenuous or non-existent, and often contested
(Harvey, 2012, online). For this reason, whilst restoring peace and security, one also creates
an environment in which corruption practices could flourish, because it is the legal
framework of the new regime that will set the boundaries for deviant conduct. When we
attempt to build peace, we create standards and rules that, once in place, can be broken
(Philp, 2008: 322). Having this in mind, it becomes easier to comprehend the
unprecedentedly high levels of corruption in post-conflict settings.
Whilst corruption practices are placed in context, it becomes necessary to acknowledge and
recognise that any successful prevention strategy should be tailored so as the address the
needs of the country in question, rather than being based on common factors and elements
which have been documented elsewhere. One pattern that cannot be easily be ignored,
however, it that corruption practices are much more common in post-conflict settings rather
than in developing countries in general, the reason for this being the variety of opportunities
which the former seems to present (Spector, 2008a; 9). In addition to that, there appear to be
several factors associated with corruption in countries, which are emerging from war:
insecurity, deprivation, presence of non-governmental organisations, as well as the amount of
aid allocated by the international community (both financial and in the form of other
resources) (Maxwell et al. 2012: 140). In fact, corruption can become deeply embedded in the
fabric of governance (Harvey, 2012, online).
Post-conflict environments are characterised by weak societal structures, a problem that is
linked to a weak civil society and a lack of independent mass media. In the words of Bertram
Spector: “years of violence can rob society and the mass media of their capacity to organise,
mobilise and educate citizens; oversee government effectively; and advocate and pressure for
reforms” (2008a 14). Moreover, prolonged conflict can adversely affect the practices
associated with legitimate forms of governance, such as transparency and accountability
(Giraldo, 2006: 6). The absence of these is a direct leftover of the conflict period, but unless
they are tackled and public trust in the operation of the government is re-established, this will
severely undermine any efforts aimed at reducing corruption (UNDP, 2010: 12).
Bolongaita (2005: 3-5) suggests that corruption poses four major obstacles to achieving
establishing long-term peace and ensuring post-conflict success. To begin with, corruption,
whether it is a real problem or only a perceived one, dissuades potential donors, be they non-
governmental organisations or countries, from allocating resources due to a lack of trust or
7 | P a g e
confidence. Next, even in cases where aid is provided, it might not necessarily reach its
beneficiaries. This is due to the fact that many corrupt agencies and officials can divert the
financial resources and use them at their own discretion for personal profit, meaning that no
one of the problems faced by the population of the country are addressed. In addition, once
corruption is embedded in a country, it leads to the accumulation of debt in the public sector,
as well as absolute deprivation. Last, but not least, the draining of financial resources creates
the need for more funds, in order to fill in the gaps in budgets and available financial assets.
These are provided by borrowing even more funds, which, in turn, are subject to more
corruption and embezzlement, creating a vicious cycle. As this becomes more
institutionalised, the problems of social exclusion and absolute deprivation within the
population are also exacerbated. Ultimately, this refuels the conflict, forcing the country and
its population to take up the same path, which the society has tried to abstain from previously.
In order to reduce the spreading of corruption in the post-conflict period several interventions
can be made. As Boucher et al. 2007 advices, it is of great importance that peace agreements
contain anticorruption clauses, thus allowing the international community to actively support
and supervise the implementation of these, whilst at the same time promoting transparency,
accountability and integrity (Boucher et al. 2007: 58-59). At the same time, the peace
negotiation process should not solely concentrate on reducing the violent conflict, but also
create the platform upon which the new political, economic and social institutions of the state
will be re-established. For the successful sustainability of security and the promotion of peace
within the state, the root causes of the conflict should be addressed and any underlying
tensions should be resolved (ibid.). Having outlined the problematic relationship which exists
between conflict, corruption and post-conflict societies, the next section of this paper will
draw attention to the effectiveness of interventions undertaken in countries that have suffered
from violent conflicts.
The effectiveness of intervention
However, the establishment of peace within conflict-ridden countries appears to be a
burdensome task, having in mind that nearly half of all post-conflict countries return to war
within five years of signing a peace treaty (Giraldo, 2006: 6). Other critics of international
peacekeeping efforts have expressed the criticism that liberal peace-building has shown to be
counterproductive, as it “created very weak states and institutions that are dependent upon
foreign support and subject to tests of power-sharing and corruption” (Richmond and Franks,
2007: 30). The imposition of liberal democratic forms of governance can result in unforeseen
8 | P a g e
problems, as it fails to take into account country-specific factors (Rondelli and Montgomery,
2005: 16). Therefore, unless the specific needs of the countries are not taken into account, the
chance for successfully tackling corruption will remain quite slim. One notable exception,
where international interventions have resulted in the stabilisation of a country and tackling
of corruption, is Indonesia (Bolongaita, 2010: 25-26). Thus, it is of vital importance to ensure
that the problems of security and peace are resolved first, before a step can be taken towards
the re-establishment of a strong national government that is able to tackle corruption-related
problems (Rondelli and Montgomery, 2005: 18-19).
Conclusion
The aim of this paper was to provide an outline of the links which exist between conflict-torn
states and corruption and whether international efforts have been successful in tackling the
problem of corruption. As it was shown, in order to successfully resolve any challenges posed
by corruption in the developing world, the global community should devise strategies that are
able to address a country’s specific needs, but also adhere to good practice. Although
significant progress has been made in the area of tackling corruption in the post-war countries
from the developing world, this is a long-term goal which can only be achieved with
perseverance and consistency in the advocated interventions. Future research in the realm of
corruption and transitional societies could potentially adopt a comparative approach and seek
to establish common factors between post-conflict countries and countries which have
experienced changes in the models of governance, i.e. post-communist states. It is likely that
corruption within the latter will take different dimensions, yet such a research project could
potentially identify and advice on good practice, which after careful consideration and
evaluation could be used to tackle corruption in post-conflict states.
9 | P a g e
Bibliography
Anderson, C. and Tverdova, Y. (2003) Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes
toward Government in Contemporary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 47(1): 91–109.
Bolongaita, E. (2005) Controlling Corruption in Post-Conflict Countries. Notre Dame, IN:
Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, Kroc Institute Occasional Paper #26:
OP: 2 (January).
Bolongaita, E. P. (2010). An exception to the rule? Why Indonesia's Anti-Corruption
Commission succeeds where others don't-a comparison with the Philippines' Ombudsman.
U4 Issue, 2010(4). Available at: http://www.cmi.no/publications/publication/?3765=an-
exception-to-the-rule
Boucher, A., Durch, W., Midyette, M., Rose, S. and Terry, J. (2007) Mapping Corruption in
War-Torn States. Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Centre.
Giraldo, J. (2006) Post-Conflict Institution Building: Beating Corruption. Monterey, CA:
Centre for Stabilization and Reconstruction Studies, Naval Postgraduate School.
Harvey, K. (2012) What makes post-conflict Situations Particularly Susceptible to
Corruption? E-International Relations [Online] Available at: http://www.e-
ir.info/2012/10/09/what-makes-post-conflict-situations-particularly-susceptible-to-
corruption/#_ftn2
Heidenheimer and Johnston (eds.) (2002) Political Corruption, New Brunswick: Transaction.
Lambsdorff, G. J. (2005). Consequences and causes of corruption: What do we know from a
cross-section of countries? (Vol. 34, No. 05). Passauer Diskussionspapiere:
Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe.
Le Billon, P. (2003) Buying Peace or Fuelling War: The Role of Corruption in Armed
Conflicts. Journal of International Development, 15(4): 413-426.
Leenders, R. (2012). Spoils of Truce: Corruption and State-building in Postwar Lebanon.
Cornell University Press.
10 | P a g e
Li, H., Xu, L. and Zou, H. (2000) Corruption, Income Distribution, and Growth. Economics
and Politics, Vol. 12(2): 155–82.
Maxwell, D., Bailey, S., Harvey, P., Walker, P., Sharbatke‐Church, C., & Savage, K. (2012).
Preventing corruption in humanitarian assistance: perceptions, gaps and challenges.
Disasters, Vol. 36(1): 140-160.
Nye, J. (1967) Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. The
American Political Science Review, Vol. 61(2): 417-427. Available at:
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1953254?uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=4&sid=2110301
6383807
Philp, M. (2008) Peacebuilding and Corruption. International Peacekeeping, 15 (3), pp. 310-
327.
Richmond, O. P., & Franks, J. (2007) Liberal hubris? Virtual peace in Cambodia. Security
Dialogue, Vol. 38(1): 27-48.
Rondinelli, D. and Montgomery, J. (2005) Regime Change and Nation Bulding: Can Donors
Restore Governance in Post-Conflict States? Public Administration and Development, Vol.
25(1): 15-23.
Spector, B. (2008a) Negotiating Peace with Integrity: Anticorruption Strategies in Post-
conflict Societies. Maryland: USIP.
Spector, B. (2008b) Perverse negotiations: Bribery, Bargaining and Ripeness, in Lyons, T.
and Khadiagala, G. (eds.) Conflict Management and African Politics. London: Routledge.
Available at: http://negotiations.org/PerverseNegotiation.pdf
Transparency International (2009) Preventing Corruption in Humanitarian Operations.
Transparency International, Berlin.
UNDP (2010) Fighting Corruption in Post-conflict and Recovery Situations: Learning from
the Past. New York: Democratic Governance Group.