(Spanish-English Emphasis) Washington, State Public ... - ERIC
Light Supports Neurite Outgrowth of Human Neural Progenitor Cells In Vitro: The Role of P2Y...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
2 -
download
0
Transcript of Light Supports Neurite Outgrowth of Human Neural Progenitor Cells In Vitro: The Role of P2Y...
Abstract - The purpose of this study was to compare the effects
of growth factors and 810-nm-wavelength light on the
differentiation of normal human neural progenitor cells in
vitro. Although growth factors are routinely used to study
neural stem and progenitor cells in vitro, to date, light has not
been used as a replacement for growth factors. This study
demonstrates that NHNPCs are not only capable of being
sustained by light in the absence of growth factors, but that
they are able to differentiate normally as assessed by neurite
formation. The NHNPCs had an up-regulation in the
expression of endogenous FGF-2, BDNF and NGF in response
to the light. Suramin, a nonselective P2 receptor antagonist,
significantly decreased neurite outgrowth and P2Y2 and
P2Y11 receptors were found to be expressed by the NHNPCs
by immunolabeling. Based on these findings,
the mechanism by which light supports NHNPC
differentiation, is hypothesized to be due to increases in ATP
acting via P2Y receptors.
Index Terms—Light-stimulated neurite outgrowth, ATP,
growth factors, neuritogenesis, receptor immunolabeling
I. INTRODUCTION
Based on numerous in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies
using red and near-infrared coherent and non-coherent light,
light therapy (LT), which is also known as low level light
therapy (LLLT), biostimulation or photobiomodulation, can
alter cellular functions and clinical conditions [1]. However,
controversy still exists concerning the effectiveness of light
as a therapy. Part of the reason for this controversy is due to
an incomplete understanding of the biochemical
Manuscript received October , 2007. This research was supported in
part by the U.S. Department of Defense, USUHS under Grant CO70WH.
J. J. Anders, T. B. Romanczyk, H. Moges, and Xingjia Wu and are
with the Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Genetics, Uniformed
Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
(phone:301-295-3203; fax: 301-295-1715; e-mail: [email protected]).
I. K. Ilev and R. W. Waynant are with the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring,
MD 20993 USA.
L. Longo is with the Institute of Laser Medicine, University of Siena,
Siena, Italy.
mechanisms underlying the observed changes in cellular
function [2].
It is now generally accepted that mitochondria are the
initial site for the effects of light on modulation of the
function of cells and tissues [3], [2]. Specifically, Karu
hypothesized that the primary photoacceptors are the mixed
valence copper centers within cytochrome c oxidase of the
mitochondrial electron transport chain [4-7]. Recent reports
have supported Karu’s hypothesis and presented data
suggesting that cytochrome c oxidase is the chromophore
for LT irradiation with near-infrared wavelengths[8-12].
The absorption of photons by the cytochrome c oxidase,
results in the acceleration of the electron transfer reactions
[13] leading to increased production of adenosine
triphosphate (ATP) [14, 15]. Other mechanisms besides
cytochrome c oxidase mediated increase in ATP production
have been proposed for the observed effects of LT (see
[16], [2] for summaries of proposed mechanisms and
downstream signaling events). However, a direct correlation
between LT, the role of mitochondria, downstream cellular
signaling and a measurable biological outcome has not been
demonstrated.
Most in vitro studies of neural progenitor cells utilize
mitogens to regulate their proliferation and differentiation
[18]-[17] , in particular, fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2)
and epidermal growth factor (EGF). To our knowledge, no
one has used light on human neural progenitor cells to
influence cellular differentiation. Wollman et.al. [18], [19]
demonstrated that low power laser irradiation enhanced
neuronal migration and induced neurite outgrowth in rat
fetal brain cells and cortical explants. Other groups
investigated the biostimulatory effects of low-power lasers
on cultured cells including fibroblasts, endothelial cells,
macrophages, melanocytes, and lymphocytes and found that
certain parameters stimulate cellular proliferation [20]-[29]
and mobility [21].
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of
growth factors and 810-nm-wavelength light on the
differentiation of normal human neural progenitor cells
(NHNPCs) in vitro. Although growth factors are routinely
used to study neural stem and progenitor cells in vitro, to
date, light has not been used as a replacement for growth
factors. The present study demonstrates that NHNPCs are
not only capable of being sustained by light in the absence
Light Supports Neurite Outgrowth of Human
Neural Progenitor Cells In Vitro: The Role of
P2Y Receptors
Juanita J. Anders1, Tara B. Romanczyk
1, Ilko K.Ilev
2, Senior Member, IEEE, Helina Moges
1,
Leonardo Longo3, Xingjia Wu
1, and Ronald W. Waynant
2, Life Fellow, IEEE
of growth factors, but that they are able to differentiate
normally as assessed by neurite formation. Neurite
formation is a primary morphological event in neuronal
differentiation [22]. The mechanism by which light supports
NHNPC differentiation, specifically neurite outgrowth, is
hypothesized to be due to increases in ATP acting via P2Y
receptors.
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS
A. Cell Culture Preparation
NHNPCs were obtained from Cambrex BioScience
(Walkersville, Maryland) and thawed in a 37°C water bath
for 1-2 minutes, resuspended in warm (37°C) neural
progenitor basal media with gentamycin sulphate (30 µg/ml)
and 15ng Amphotericin B (NPBM), and incubated (24 hr,
37°C, 5% CO2). The cells were centrifuged (1000 rpm, 5
min). The supernatant was removed and the pellet was
resuspended in either NPBM (for control and light-treated
slides) or NPMM (for factor slides). To prepare NPMM,
human recombinant (hr) epidermal growth factor (EGF), hr
fibroblastic growth factor 2 (FGF-2), and neural survival
factor-1 (NSF-1) were added to NPBM according to
manufacturer. The cells were plated on polyethyleneimine
(PEI) or laminin coated-chamber slides at a seeding density
of ~25,000 cells/cm2. All cell culture products were
purchased from Cambrex (Walkersville, MD).
B. Light Treatment
NHNPCs were separated into three groups: Control Group
(no light, no factors), Factors Group (factors only, no light),
and Light Treated Group (light only, no factors). Light-
treated NHNPCs were exposed to a continuous-wave 810-
nm-wavelength, 150-mW-power diode laser (at a power
density of 50 mW/cm2, an exposure time of 4 s, and a
radiation dose of 0.2 J/cm2
or 100 mW/cm2, 2 s, and 0.2
J/cm2). The light treatment parameters used in this study
were based on a series of preliminary experiments. For the
preliminary experiments, NHNPCs were plated on slides
and treated with light once a day for three days and grown
for a total of seven days in three separate experiments using
the following laser parameters: 1) wavelengths: 458.6, 477,
488.7, 515, 646, 660, 780, 807, 810, and 975 nm; 2) doses
(810 nm light, at 50 mW/cm2): 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1,
0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 J/cm2; and 3) power density (810 nm
light): 1, 3, 10, 30, 50, and 100 mW/cm2. For each of the
three experiments, the diameter of the laser(s) spot size was
10 mm corresponding to an area of 0.785 cm2. A minimum
of two slides containing NHNPCs per experimental group
was used. Each experiment also had Control and Factors
slides. A surface area analysis was used to evaluate the
growth of the NHNPCs for selection of the optimal laser
parameters for this study.
C. Immunostaining
NHNPCs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma) in
phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (10 min., room
temperature) at four days after the last day of light
treatment. The cultures were rinsed in PBS and incubated in
the primary polyclonal antibody for doublecortin (DCX)
(1:3000, Chemicon, Temecula, CA)(1 hr, 4°C) or overnight
at 4°C for the primary antibodies: nestin monoclonal (1:100,
Chemicon, Temecula, CA); musashi polyclonal (1:200,
Chemicon, Temecula, CA); glial fibrillary acidic protein
(GFAP) polyclonal (1:300, DAKO, Carpinteria, CA); and
anti-β-tubulin isotype III (TUJ1) monoclonal (1:75, Sigma,
St. Louis, MO). DCX is a phosphoprotein that is widely
expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and is
present in migrating and differentiating neurons. Nestin is a
Class VI intermediate filament widely used as a
predominant marker for stem / progenitor cells, in the
mammalian CNS. Musashi is selectively expressed in
neural progenitor cells, including neural stem cells. TUJ1 is
transiently expressed in neuronal- and/or glial precursor
cells. In adult tissues, the distribution of beta III is almost
exclusively neuron-specific. GFAP is a class III
intermediate filament protein that is specifically expressed
in astrocytes in the CNS. For the detection of primary
antibodies, fluorescein (FITC)-, or cyanine 3 (CY3) -
conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch
Laboratories, West Grove, PA) were used. Slides were
cover-slipped using vectashield mounting medium with 4,6-
diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories,
Burlingame, CA). No primary antibody was added for
negative control slides. Slides were photographed using a
Nikon (Tokyo, Japan) Labophot fluorescent microscope,
and images were captured using a Sony (Tokyo, Japan)
DKC 5000 Catseye digital still camera.
D. Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
NHNPCs were placed into four groups: Control (RNA
extraction at 7 days in vitro (DIV)), Factors (RNA
extraction at 7 days in vitro (DIV)), Light Treated (RNA
extraction at 3 days in vitro (DIV)), and Light Treated
(RNA extraction at 7 days in vitro (DIV)). The light treated
NHNPCs were exposed to an 810 nm, 150 mW diode laser
at a power density of 50 mW/cm2, 4 s, 0.2 J/cm
2 for three
days. Total cellular RNA was extracted and reverse
transcribed using First-Strand Synthesis beads (Marsha
Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) as per the protocol of the
manufacturers (Nitrogen, Carlsbad, CA and Amersham
Pharmacia). Briefly, cells were lysed by the addition of
TRIzol. RNA was extracted using the chloroform/
isopropanol method and purified with 75% ethanol prior to
being resuspended. RNA was transferred to tubes
containing First-Strand Synthesis beads (Amersham
Pharmacia) and Random Hexamers (Invitrogen) and
incubated (1 hr, 37°C). Resultant cDNA was amplified
using the following primers: FGF-2 (5'- GCC ACA TCT
AAT CTC ATT TCA CA -3'; 5'- CTG GGT AAC AGC
AGA TGC AA -3'), nerve growth factor (NGF) (5'-
CCAAGGGAGCAGCTTTCTATCCTGG -3'; 5'-
GGCAGTGTCAAGGGAATGCTGAAGT -3'), EGF (5'-
CTAATCACCTACTCAATGCCTGG -3'; 5'-
TGATTCTCCCAGTACTCTTACTTGG -3’), brain derived
neurotrophic factor (BDNF)
(5’AGCCTCCTCTTCTCTTTCTGCTGGA -3'; 5'-
CTTTTGTCTATGCCCCTGCAGCCTT -3') , and beta-
actin (β-actin) (5'- GTG GCA TCC ACG AAA CTA CCT
T -3'; 5'- GGA CTC GTC ATA CTC CTG CTT G -3'). PCR
products were run on 2% agarose gel and quantified as
previously described [23]. Briefly, pixel density for each
band was measured using MultiGauge (Fuji Photo Film Co.,
Ltd., Valhalla, New York) and calculated based on the ratio
between the intensity value of the experimental gene versus
the endogenous control, β-actin. All data are presented as
the ratio of gene of interest to β-actin + SEM.
E. Suramin Sodium Salt Treatment
For dose-effect analysis of suramin sodium salt (Sigma,
St. Louis, MO), a nonselective P2 receptor antagonist, on
NHNPCs, the cells were randomly placed into one of three
groups: Control, Factor or Light. Each group was further
divided into four subgroups according to treatment with
suramin: no suramin, 10 uM suramin, 50 uM suramin, and
100 uM suramin. For co-treatment of neurospheres with
light, cells were exposed to an 810 nm light at 15 minutes
and 24 hours after addition of the antagonist. After 48 hours
of growth, neurospheres were fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde (10 min) and stored in PBS (4ºC).
F. Quantification of Neurite Outgrowth
The effects of different treatments on neurite outgrowth
were analyzed using Neuron J in Image J
(http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). For DCX immunolabeled
NHNPCs, a minimum of five random neurospheres was
selected each from a separate optical field (10x objective).
Neurospheres were examined using a Nikon Labophot
fluorescent microscope, and images were captured using a
Sony DKC 5000 Catseye digital still camera. All neurites
were measured and data was expressed as the mean of the
neurite length ± SEM. For analyzing the effect of suramin
sodium salt on neurite outgrowth, slides were also analyzed
using Neuron J in Image J. Each group consisted of two
slides and for each slide a minimum of ten random
neurospheres was selected each from a separate optical
field. Phase contrast images were taken using a Zeiss
Axiocam HRC camera (Germany) connected to a Zeiss
Axiovert 200 microscope (Germany). Neurite
measurements for each group were expressed as the average
of the sum of the neurite lengths for each neurosphere
examined.
F. P2Y Receptor Immunolabeling
For P2Y2 receptor immunofluorescence labeling, live
NHNPCs were incubated in primary antibody (rabbit
polyclonal anti-P2Y2, 1:200, Alomone Labs, Jerusalem,
Israel) (37ºC, 5% CO2, 1 hr). Cells were washed in NPBM
containing 1% donkey serum (DS) (Jackson
Immunoresearch Laboratories) and 0.1% bovine serum
albumin (BSA, Sigma). Cells were incubated with Cy3
conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:800, Jackson
Immunoresearch Laboratories) in NPBM/1%DS/0.1%BSA.
Slides were washed once in PBS, fixed for 15 min in 4%
paraformaldehyde, washed in PBS (3 x 5 minutes), and
coverslipped using vectashield with DAPI (Vector
Laboratories). For P2Y11 receptor immunofluorescence
labeling, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (10 min)
and washed in PBS containing 0.2% Triton-X 100 (Sigma)
followed by overnight incubation in primary antibody
(rabbit polyclonal anti-P2Y11 antibody, 1:200, Alomone
Labs) at 4ºC. After four washes with PBS containing
0.1%BSA and 0.1%Triton-X 100, cells were incubated in
Cy3 conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:800) in PBS/
2%Triton-X 100 and washed in PBS. Slides were then
coverslipped using vectashield with DAPI. Images of P2Y2
and P2Y11 immunolabeled cells were acquired using an
inverted Leica TCS SP confocal microscope with a 63x oil
objective lens.
G. Statistics
The data were
analyzed using the statistical software
program GraphPad Prism version 3.02 for Windows
(GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, www.graphpad.com).
Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a level of 0.05,
followed by a Tukey multiple comparison test.
III. RESULTS
A. Characterization of NHNPCs
The NHNPCs expressed the progenitor markers nestin
(Fig. 1A) and musashi (Fig. 1B), demonstrating the
presence of progenitor cells within the neurosphere. To
determine if light would drive NHNPCs into specific
cellular phenotypes that differed from those of NHNPCs
grown in the presence of growth factors,
immunocytochemistry for neuronal (TUJ1) and glial
(GFAP) markers was performed. Under normal conditions,
NHNPCs typically co-express GFAP and TUJ1. NHNPCs,
grown either in the presence of growth factors (Fig. 1C) or
exposed to 810 nm light in the absence of growth factors
(Fig. 1D) labeled for both the neuronal and glial markers.
This similar co-expression of the neuronal and glial labeled
proteins in the Factors and the Light groups (Fig. 1C, D)
indicates that the 810 nm light did not change the
phenotypic morphology of the NHNPCs.
JSTQE
4
Fig. 1. NHNPCs were plated and grown under either normal
conditions (A-C) (in the presence of growth factors: FGF-2
and EGF), or were treated with 810 nm light and in the
absence of factors (D) for 7 days. They were fixed and
processed for single label immunocyto-chemistry using
musashi (A) and nestin (B), or double-label
immunocytochemistry using TUJ1 and GFAP and
counterstained with DAPI (blue) to visualize nuclei.
NHNPCs have labeled (green) processes with musashi (A)
and nestin (B), confirming the presence of stem/ progenitor
cells within the neurospheres. Factor treated NHNPCs (C)
and 810 nm light treated NHNPCs (D) labeled with TUJ1
(red) and GFAP (green). Bar = 100 µm (A, B); 200 µm (C,
D).
B. Endogenous Production of Growth Factors by NHNPCs
To evaluate the mechanism by which light sustained and
differentiated NHNPCs in vitro, the effect of light on
NHNPCs expression of growth factors was determined.
Gene expression for FGF-2, EGF, BDNF, NGF and β-actin
were determined (Fig. 2A). Semi-quantitative measurement
of the bands for FGF-2, EGF, BDNF, and NGF was done
(Fig 2B). Both Light Treated groups had significantly
greater expression of FGF-2 compared to the Factors
(p<0.05, p<0.01 respectively) and Control (p<0.01) groups.
No significant difference in EGF expression was detected
(p=0.1692). The Control group had significantly less
expression of BDNF compared to the Factors and both
Light Treated groups (p<0.05). Both Light Treated groups
had significantly greater expression of NGF compared to
the Factors and Control (p<0.001) groups. Also, the Light
Treated (7DIV) group had significantly greater expression
of NGF than the Light Treated (3DIV) group (p<0.001).
Fig. 2. NHNPCs were placed into four groups: Control,
Factors, Light treated (3DIV) and Light treated (7 DIV).
A, Gene expression for FGF-2, EGF, BDNF, NGF and β-
actin. B, Semi-quantitative measurement for FGF-2, EGF,
BDNF, and NGF. One-way ANOVA was performed for
each growth factor. FGF: Both light groups had
significantly greater expression compared to Factors
(p<0.05, p<0.01 respectively) and Control (p<0.01). EGF:
No significant difference detected (p=0.1692). BDNF: The
Control group had significantly less expression than
Factors, Light 3D, Light 7D (p<0.05). NGF: Both light
groups had significantly greater expression compared to
Factors and Control (p<0.001). Light 7DIV had
significantly greater expression compared to Light 3DIV
(p<0.001).
C. Growth Factors and Light Increase Neurite Outgrowth
of NHNPCs
To determine if light influenced neurite outgrowth of the
NHNPCs, immunocytochemistry for the neuronal migration
marker, DCX, was performed (Fig. 3A-E). Neurite
outgrowth was assessed and plotted for each group (Fig.
3F). The negative control slide (Fig. 3A) did not contain
any DCX labeling. The Control group (Fig. 3B, F) had
shorter neurite length than the Factors group (Fig. 3C, F)
and Light Treated groups (Fig. 3D, E, F). The 50 mW/cm2
group (Fig. 3D) had many labeled neurites. Statistical
analysis between the groups using one-way ANOVA
JSTQE
5
revealed a significant difference (p<0.0001). The Factors
and Light Treated (50 mW/cm2) groups had significantly
longer neurites compared to Control and Light Treated (100
mW/cm2) groups (p<0.001). There was no significant
difference between the Factors and Light Treated (50
mW/cm2) groups. These results support the hypothesis that
light is capable of inducing neurite outgrowth in NHNPCs
in the absence of growth factors.
Fig. 3. NHNPCs were placed into four groups: Control,
Factors, 50 mw/cm2 and 100 mw/cm
2. The Light Treated
slides were treated with 810 nm light for three days. All
groups of cells were grown for a total of 7 days, fixed,
processed for DCX (red) immunocytochemistry, and
counterstained with DAPI (blue) to visualize nuclei. The
negative control slide (A) did not contain any label for
DCX. The Control group (B) had shorter neural extensions
than the Factors (C) and Light-treated groups (D-E). The
50 mW/cm2 group (D) revealed many labeled neural
extensions. The 100 mW/ cm2 group (E) had fewer neurites
than the 50 mW/cm2 group (D). This was confirmed by
measurements taken in each group (F). Overall one-way
ANOVA was statistically significant (p<0.0001). Factors
and 50 mW/cm2 had significantly longer neurite outgrowth
as compared to Control and 100 mW/cm2 (p<0.001).
Factors and 50 mW/cm2 were comparable to one another.
Bar = 200 µm.
D. The Role of P2Y Receptors in NHNPCs Neurite
Extension
To determine if purinergic receptors are involved in
NHNPCs neurite extension, the effect of a non-specific P2
receptor antagonist (suramin) was examined and the data
are shown in Fig. 4. Using various concentrations of
suramin, a dose dependent inhibition of light enhanced
neurite outgrowth was observed (Fig. 4D, E, F and I). In the
Light Treated group (Fig. 4I), neurospheres that were
treated with 50 uM (p<0.05) and 100 uM (p<0.01) suramin
had a significantly decreased summed neurite length as
compared to cells that did not receive suramin. There was
no significant difference in summed neurite length of
neurospheres due to suramin treatment in Control (Fig. 4G)
and Factors (Fig. 4H) groups.
E. Expression of P2Y Receptors in NHNPCs
Immunostaining of NHNPCs with P2Y2 and P2Y11
showed that both the receptors are expressed in these cells.
The P2Y2 staining was abundant and located within the
cytoplasm (Fig 5A and C). As shown in Figure 5B and 5D,
the P2Y11 labeling was seen as punctate staining within the
plasma membrane.
IV. DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of
growth factors and light on the differentiation of NHNPCs
in vitro. The present study demonstrates that NHNPCs
treated with light can differentiate normally, extend
neurites, and up-regulate the expression of endogenous
FGF-2, BDNF and NGF.
A. ATP Production
The primary photoacceptors have been hypothesized to
be the mixed valence copper centers within cytochrome c
oxidase of the mitochondrial electron transport chain [4-7].
Recent reports suggested that cytochrome c oxidase is the
chromophore for LT irradiation with near-infrared
wavelengths [8-12] and supported Karu’s hypothesis.
Absorption of photons by cytochrome c oxidase, results in
the acceleration of the electron transfer reactions [13] and
increased production of ATP [14]-[16].
Modulation of ATP production has been hypothesized by
many researchers to be responsible for the beneficial effects
of light on cells and tissues. Light therapy (wavelength 810
nm) of ischemic mammalian heart was reported to cause a
six fold increase in ATP production by cardiomyocytes in
the ischemic zone as compared to the non-treated heart [24,
25]. Also, ATP was significantly increased in laser-treated
rat cerebral cortex regions compared to non-treated regions
[24]. Of direct relevance to this study is a recent publication
that reported a significant increase in ATP treated NHNPCs
compared to non-treated controls [26]. The NHNPCs
JSTQE
6
Fig.4. NHNP cells were grown under three conditions: Control group that received no light or growth factors (A); Factors
group that received only growth factors (B); and Light group that received LT but no growth factors (C). Addition of suramin to
cells inhibited light enhanced neurite outgrowth in a dose dependent manner (D, E and F are cells in light group that received
10uM, 50uM and 100uM suramin respectively). In the Light Treated group (I), neuroshperes that were treated with 50uM
(p<0.05) and 100uM (p<0.01) suramin had a significantly decreased summed neurite length as compared to cells that did not
receive suramin. There was no significant difference in summed neurite length of neurospheres due to suramin treatment in
Control (G) and Factors (H) groups. (Bar = 100 um)
were treated with laser parameters (Ga-As laser; 808 nm, 50
mW/cm2, 0.05 J/cm
2) that were similar to those used in this
report (laser diode, 810 nm, 50 mW/cm2, 4 s, 0.2 J/cm
2 or
100mW/cm2, 2 s, 0.2 J/cm2). The possibility that light
treated NHNPCs have other mechanisms activated in
response to light besides cytochrome c oxidase mediated
increase in ATP production cannot be ruled out. However,
the mechanism by which light supports NHNPC
differentiation, specifically neurite outgrowth and up-
regulation of growth factor expression can be explained by
increases in ATP acting via P2Y receptors.
B. Extracellular ATP and P2Y Receptors
ATP is a potent signaling molecule that causes a wide
range of physiological effects [27]. These effects range
from neurotransmission, chemosensory signaling, secretion,
vasodilation, and more complex effects such as immune
responses, pain modulation, fertilization and embryonic
development [27]. ATP is abundantly present in the CNS
and research suggests a role for extracellular ATP in the
development and maintenance of the nervous system and its
response to injury or diseases [28, 29].
ATP acts through the P2 receptors [30]. In 1978,
Burnstock provided the basis for distinguishing between
adenosine receptors (P1) and ATP receptors (P2) [31]. P2
receptors were classified into P2X (ionotrophic) receptors
that belong to a superfamily of transmitter gated ion
channels [32] and P2Y (metabotropic) receptors that are
members of the G-protein-coupled superfamily [33]. To
date, eight P2Y receptors (P2Y1,-2,-4,-6,and -11 to -14)
have been identified [34]. Both P2Y and P2X receptors are
present in the CNS but the effect of the individual P2Y
receptor subtypes on neuronal function and
JSTQE
7
Fig. 5. Expression of P2Y receptors in NHNP cells. Fluorescence images of NHNP cells immunolabeled with
Anti-P2Y2 receptor (A,C) and anti-P2Y11receptor (B, D). (Bars; A, B = 10um; C,D = 5um).
their interaction with signal transduction pathways in the
CNS still needs to be determined [35].
C. P2Y Receptors and Neuritogenesis
In 1999, Rathbone proposed that purines may interact with
neurons or neuronal precursors, eliciting neuritogenesis,
maintenance of existing neurites, and enhanced survival
[36]. It was initially reported that ATP and GTP could
potentiate the NGF-induced neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells
and that ATP alone enhanced cell survival but wasn’t
capable of inducing neuritogenesis [37]. However, it has
recently been reported that extracellular ATP stimulated
neurite outgrowth independent of other neurotrophic factors
[37]. Using various purinergic and signaling cascade
agonists and antagonists, the authors suggested that ATP
stimulated neurite outgrowth via the P2Y11 receptor and
that this effect was mediated by activation of mitogen-
activated protein kinase (MAPK). Purinergic receptors can
act through numerous signaling cascades. Extracellular
signal regulated kinase (ERK) is a key member of the
MAPK family and is a crucial mediator of trophic effects
including neuronal plasticity.
In this study, suramin significantly inhibited light-
enhanced neurite outgrowth, and expression of two of the
P2Y receptors, P2Y2 and P2Y11, was confirmed indicating
the involvement of P2Y receptors in light induced
enhancement of neurite outgrowth. The expression profile
of other P2Y receptors in NHNPCs and the role of each
receptor in light induced enhancement of neurite outgrowth
will be addressed in future experiments by examining the
effect of their respective agonists and antagonists.
D. Light Treatment and Growth Factor Expression
In this study, a significant increase in gene expression of
FGF2 and NGF was found in the NHNPCs that were treated
with light. The mechanism for this effect is not known. Of
interest are reports that nucleotides and nucleosides can
induce astrocytes to synthesize NGF, NT-3 and FGF [38].
Based on these observations it has been suggested that
purines and pyrimidines may modulate the function of glia
and neurons by inducing synthesis of these factors [38].
The significant increase in FGF2 and NGF may also play a
role in the observed neuritogenesis. There are numerous
reports of ATP acting synergistically with growth factors.
The intracellular pathways that would allow for an
interaction of P2Y receptors and growth factor receptor
mediated signaling cascades are known [39]. Further
studies are needed to determine if an increase in
JSTQE
8
ATP caused by light results in an increase in growth factor
expression.
V. CONCLUSION
The data presented here establish the neuritogenic potential
of light on NHNPCs in a growth factor and serum-free
environment. Based on these findings we propose that the
light caused an increase in ATP that acted through P2Y
receptors and downstream signaling pathways leading to
neurite outgrowth. Further experiments are underway to
identify the involved signaling pathways. Increasing
evidence suggests that extracellular ATP may be an
important neurotrophic agent in CNS development,
neuronal survival, and repair. Light therapy via the
generation of ATP can have profound effects on CNS
development and neuronal survival after injury and disease.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank Dr. Kimberly Byrnes for
her informative discussions, and editorial comments
regarding this manuscript. We would also like to thank the
following people who assisted in this research project: Rolf
Graning, Rose Eisenbeiss and Dr. Albert Amat. The
opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones
of the authors and are not to be construed as official or
reflecting the views of the DoD, USUHS or FDA.
REFERENCES
[1] J. Tuner, "The Laser Therapy Handbook," Grangesberg:
Priman Books, 2004, p. 589.
[2] T. N. D.-R. Michael R. Hamblin, Cellular Chromophores and
Signaling in Low Level Light Therapy vol. 6428. San Jose,
California: SPIE- The Interantional Society for Optical
Engineering, 2007.
[3] J. Streeter, L. D. Taboada, and U. Oron, "Mechanisms of action
of light therapy for stroke and acute myocardial infarction,"
Mitochondrion, vol. 4, pp. 569-576, 2004.
[4] T. I. Karu and S. F. Kolyakov, "Exact action spectra for cellular
responses relevant to phototherapy," Photomed Laser Surg,
vol. 23, pp. 355-61, Aug 2005.
[5] T. I. Karu, L. V. Pyatibrat, S. F. Kolyakov, and N. I.
Afanasyeva, "Absorption measurements of a cell monolayer
relevant to phototherapy: reduction of cytochrome c oxidase
under near IR radiation," J Photochem Photobiol B, vol. 81,
pp. 98-106, Nov 1 2005.
[6] T. I. Karu, L. V. Pyatibrat, and N. I. Afanasyeva, "Cellular
effects of low power laser therapy can be mediated by nitric
oxide," Lasers Surg Med, vol. 36, pp. 307-14, Apr 2005.
[7] V. M. Manteifel and T. I. Karu, "[Structure of mitochondria
and activity of their respiratory chain in subsequent generations
of yeast cells exposed to He-Ne laser light]," Izv Akad Nauk Ser
Biol, pp. 672-83, Nov-Dec 2005.
[8] J. T. Eells, M. M. Henry, P. Summerfelt, M. T. Wong-Riley, E.
V. Buchmann, M. Kane, N. T. Whelan, and H. T. Whelan,
"Therapeutic photobiomodulation for methanol-induced retinal
toxicity," Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 100, pp. 3439-44,
Mar 18 2003.
[9] J. T. Eells, M. T. Wong-Riley, J. VerHoeve, M. Henry, E. V.
Buchman, M. P. Kane, L. J. Gould, R. Das, M. Jett, B. D.
Hodgson, D. Margolis, and H. T. Whelan, "Mitochondrial
signal transduction in accelerated wound and retinal healing by
near-infrared light therapy," Mitochondrion, vol. 4, pp. 559-67,
Sep 2004.
[10] H. L. Liang, H. T. Whelan, J. T. Eells, H. Meng, E. Buchmann,
A. Lerch-Gaggl, and M. Wong-Riley, "Photobiomodulation
partially rescues visual cortical neurons from cyanide-induced
apoptosis," Neuroscience, vol. 139, pp. 639-49, May 12 2006.
[11] M. T. Wong-Riley, X. Bai, E. Buchmann, and H. T. Whelan,
"Light-emitting diode treatment reverses the effect of TTX on
cytochrome oxidase in neurons," Neuroreport, vol. 12, pp.
3033-7, Oct 8 2001.
[12] M. T. Wong-Riley, H. L. Liang, J. T. Eells, B. Chance, M. M.
Henry, E. Buchmann, M. Kane, and H. T. Whelan,
"Photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons
functionally inactivated by toxins: role of cytochrome c
oxidase," J Biol Chem, vol. 280, pp. 4761-71, Feb 11 2005.
[13] W. Yu, J. O. Naim, M. McGowan, K. Ippolito, and R. J.
Lanzafame, "Photomodulation of oxidative metabolism and
electron chain enzymes in rat liver mitochondria," Photochem
Photobiol, vol. 66, pp. 866-71, Dec 1997.
[14] S. Passarella, A. Ostuni, A. Atlante, and E. Quagliariello,
"Increase in the ADP/ATP exchange in rat liver mitochondria
irradiated in vitro by helium-neon laser," Biochem Biophys Res
Commun, vol. 156, pp. 978-86, 1988.
[15] S. Passarella, "He-Ne laser irradiation of isolated
mitochondria," J Photochem Photobiol B, vol. 3, pp. 642-3,
Aug 1989.
[16] D. T. N. Hamblin michael R, Mechanisms of Low Level Light
Therapy vol. 6140. San Jose, CA: SPIE- the international
society for optical engineering, 2006.
[17] A. Gritti, E. A. Parati, L. Cova, P. Frolichsthal, R. Galli, E.
Wanke, L. Faravelli, D. J. Morassutti, F. Roisen, D. D. Nickel,
and A. L. Vescovi, "Multipotential stem cells from the adult
mouse brain proliferate and self-renew in response to basic
fibroblast growth factor," J Neurosci, vol. 16, pp. 1091-100,
Feb 1 1996.
[18] Y. Wollman, S. Rochkind, and R. Simantov, "Low power laser
irradiation enhances migration and neurite sprouting of
cultured rat embryonal brain cells," Neurol Res, vol. 18, pp.
467-70, Oct 1996.
[19] Y. Wollman and S. Rochkind, "In vitro cellular processes
sprouting in cortex microexplants of adult rat brains induced
by low power laser irradiation," Neurol Res, vol. 20, pp. 470-2,
Jul 1998.
[20] P. Moore, T. D. Ridgway, R. G. Higbee, E. W. Howard, and M.
D. Lucroy, "Effect of wavelength on low-intensity laser
irradiation-stimulated cell proliferation in vitro," Lasers Surg
Med, vol. 36, pp. 8-12, Jan 2005.
[21] A. F. Haas, R. R. Isseroff, R. G. Wheeland, P. A. Rood, and P.
J. Graves, "Low-energy helium-neon laser irradiation increases
the motility of cultured human keratinocytes," J Invest
Dermatol, vol. 94, pp. 822-6, Jun 1990.
[22] N. Yamamoto, A. Tamada, and F. Murakami, "Wiring of the
brain by a range of guidance cues," Prog Neurobiol, vol. 68,
pp. 393-407, Dec 2002.
[23] Y. Ming, E. Bergman, E. Edstrom, and B. Ulfhake,
"Reciprocal changes in the expression of neurotrophin mRNAs
in target tissues and peripheral nerves of aged rats," Neurosci
Lett, vol. 273, pp. 187-90, Oct 8 1999.
[24] N. Mochizuki-Oda, Y. Kataoka, Y. Cui, H. Yamada, M. Heya,
and K. Awazu, "Effects of near-infra-red laser irradiation on
adenosine triphosphate and adenosine diphosphate contents of
rat brain tissue," Neurosci Lett, vol. 323, pp. 207-10, May 3
2002.
[25] U. Oron, T. Yaakobi, A. Oron, D. Mordechovitz, R. Shofti, G.
Hayam, U. Dror, L. Gepstein, T. Wolf, C. Haudenschild, and S.
B. Haim, "Low-energy laser irradiation reduces formation of
scar tissue after myocardial infarction in rats and dogs,"
Circulation, vol. 103, pp. 296-301, Jan 16 2001.
[26] U. Oron, S. Ilic, L. De Taboada, and J. Streeter, "Ga-As (808
nm) laser irradiation enhances ATP production in human
neuronal cells in culture," Photomed Laser Surg, vol. 25, pp.
180-2, Jun 2007.
JSTQE
9
[27] C. A. Volonte, S. Cavaliere, F., D'Ambrosi, N., Vacca, F.,
Bernardi, G., "Extracellular ATP and Neurodegeneration," CNS
and Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets, vol. 6, p. 10,
2003.
[28] H. Franke and P. Illes, "Involvement of P2 receptors in the
growth and survival of neurons in the CNS," Pharmacol Ther,
vol. 109, pp. 297-324, Mar 2006.
[29] H. Franke, U. Krugel, and P. Illes, "P2 receptors and neuronal
injury," Pflugers Arch, vol. 452, pp. 622-44, Aug 2006.
[30] B. B. Fredholm, M. P. Abbracchio, G. Burnstock, J. W. Daly,
T. K. Harden, K. A. Jacobson, P. Leff, and M. Williams,
"Nomenclature and classification of purinoceptors,"
Pharmacol Rev, vol. 46, pp. 143-56, Jun 1994.
[31] G. Burnstock, "Cell Membrane Receptors for Drugs and
Hormones: A multidisciplinary Approach
" in A basis for distinguishing two types of purinergic receptor.
New York: Raven Press, 1978, pp. 107-118.
[32] B. P. Bean, "Pharmacology and electrophysiology of ATP-
activated ion channels," Trends Pharmacol Sci, vol. 13, pp. 87-
90, Mar 1992.
[33] E. A. Barnard, G. Burnstock, and T. E. Webb, "G protein-
coupled receptors for ATP and other nucleotides: a new
receptor family," Trends Pharmacol Sci, vol. 15, pp. 67-70,
Mar 1994.
[34] G. Burnstock and G. E. Knight, "Cellular distribution and
functions of P2 receptor subtypes in different systems," Int Rev
Cytol, vol. 240, pp. 31-304, 2004.
[35] D. B. Arthur, K. Akassoglou, and P. A. Insel, "P2Y2 receptor
activates nerve growth factor/TrkA signaling to enhance
neuronal differentiation," Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, vol. 102,
pp. 19138-43, Dec 27 2005.
[36] M. P. Rathbone, P. J. Middlemiss, J. W. Gysbers, C. Andrew,
M. A. Herman, J. K. Reed, R. Ciccarelli, P. Di Iorio, and F.
Caciagli, "Trophic effects of purines in neurons and glial cells,"
Prog Neurobiol, vol. 59, pp. 663-90, Dec 1999.
[37] S. Lakshmi and P. G. Joshi, "Activation of
Src/kinase/phospholipase C/mitogen-activated protein kinase
and induction of neurite expression by ATP, independent of
nerve growth factor," Neuroscience, vol. 141, pp. 179-89, Aug
11 2006.
[38] J. T. Neary, M. P. Rathbone, F. Cattabeni, M. P. Abbracchio,
and G. Burnstock, "Trophic actions of extracellular nucleotides
and nucleosides on glial and neuronal cells," Trends Neurosci,
vol. 19, pp. 13-8, Jan 1996.
[39] S. K. Mishra, N. Braun, V. Shukla, M. Fullgrabe, C.
Schomerus, H. W. Korf, C. Gachet, Y. Ikehara, J. Sevigny, S.
C. Robson, and H. Zimmermann, "Extracellular nucleotide
signaling in adult neural stem cells: synergism with growth
factor-mediated cellular proliferation," Development, vol. 133,
pp. 675-84, Feb 2006.
Juanita Anders received a B.SC. degree
in Biology from Wilkes University, Wilkes
Barre, PA in 1969, a M.Sc. degree in
Zoology from Pennsylvania State
Univerity, State College PA in 1972 and a
Ph.D. degree in Anatomy from the
University of Maryland Medical School,
Baltimore, Maryland in 1977. She is a
Professor of Anatomy, Physiology and
Genetics at Uniformed Services University
of the Health Sciences. She also has a
secondary appointment as Professor of
Neuroscience at USUHS. While at the
National Institutes of Health in the Laboratory of Neuropathology and
Neuroanatomical Sciences, NINDS, she specialized in glial/ neuronal
interaction in normal and injured nervous tissue. Since joining USUHS,
her research interests have expanded to the use of light as a non-invasive
therapy for deep tissue injuries and the interaction of light with pluripotent
cells. Her research on the use of light applied non-invasively for repair of
spinal cord injury has received international attention. Dr. Anders serves
on the Executive Councils and Scientific Advisory Boards of several laser
societies. She is the past president of the North American Association of
Laser Therapy and a founding member of the International Academy of
Laser Medicine and Surgery. She serves on the Editorial Boards of
Photomedicine and Laser Surgery and Lasers in Surgery and Medicine and
as a reviewer for several other journals. She has published over 50 peer
reviewed articles.
Tara Romanczyk received a B.S. degree in
biology from West Chester University, West
Chester, PA in 1997. From 1998 to 2000, she
was a pre-doctoral IRTA at the National
Institute of Mental Health where her research
focused on schizophrenia. She received her
Ph.D. degree in Neuroscience from the
Uniformed Services University of the Health
Sciences, Bethesda, MD in 2007. Her
research interests include neurogenesis,
neuro-degenerative diseases and stroke, and photobiomodulation.
Ilko Ilev has over 20 years of experience in
the United States, Europe and Japan in the
field of quantum physics and laser
technologies, fiber optics, laser medicine,
non-invasive optical diagnostics and
biosensing, and ultrahigh-resolution optical
imaging. He received M.S. and Ph.D. degrees
in Laser Physics from Sofia University and
Technical University of Sofia, Bulgaria, in
1983 and 1992, respectively. He has worked in the Opto-electronics
Division at the Strathclyde University,
Glasgow, UK, in 1995, and in the Laser Technology Laboratory at the
Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Tokyo, Japan, from
1995 to 1997. From 1998 to 2001 he was an American Academy of
Science/National Research Council (NRC) Research Associate in U.S.
Food and Drug Administration. Since May 2001 he has been with the
Center for Devices and Radiological Health at U.S. FDA where he is the
Leader of the Optical Therapeutics and Medical Nanophotonics
Laboratory. Dr. Ilev has produced more than 280 papers in peer-reviewed
journals and presentations at major national and international conferences
and meetings. His current research interests include development of novel
and simple minimally invasive biophotonics techniques including smart
tissue-activated fiber-optic structures and nanobiosensors for studying
single cell and intracellular chemical analytes, mechanisms of light-tissue
interactions at sub-cellular level and ultrahigh-resolution bioimaging
beyond the diffraction limit in the subwavelength nanoscale range.
Leonardo Longo received an M.D. degree
from the University of Florence, Florence,
Italy in 1981. He is an Associate Professor
of Laser Medicine and Surgery at the
University of Siena, Siena Italy and an
Associate Professor of Laser Aesthetic
Medicine and Surgery at the University of
S. Marino, S. Marino Republic. Among
numerous other positions, he is Chief of the
Institute for Laser Medicine of Florence
(I.L.M.), and Director of Laser Medicine
and Surgery Service of "Istituto Prosperius - Sezione Ricerca Medica" and
Private Hospital "Villa Cherubini" in Florence, a founding member and
President of the International Academy for Laser Medicine and Surgery,
and is the current President of the International Society of Laser Medicine
and Surgery. Prof. Longo is an expert in both high powered and low
powered lasers. He is highly pro-active in the field and has received
numerous honors for his work. He is President and organizer of the annual
Laser Florence International Congress and Courses.
JSTQE
10
Dr. Ronald W. Waynant is a Senior Optical
Engineer at the Food and Drug
Administration, Rockville, MD. He was an
Adjunct Professor of Electrical Engineering
at Catholic University of America,
Washington DC and taught a graduate level
laser course for fourteen years there. He
currently serves on the Advisory Board to the
Catholic University Department of Electrical
Engineering. He is now an Adjunct
Associate Professor at the Uniformed
Services University for the Health Sciences
in Bethesda. Most recently, he has been
working on laser therapy mechanisms and various sources for and uses of
laser therapy. He is also interested in laser medicine, infrared fiber optics,
and laser generated x-rays for medical imaging. He has edited five books
in the electro-optics and laser medical areas and four special issues of
IEEE LEOS Journal of Special Topics in Quantum Electronics. He has
organized seven conferences for the Engineering Conferences
International organization on lasers, laser medicine and laser therapy. He
has also served on IEEE LEOS Board of Governors for fifteen years. His
research work in the past fifteen years has been funded by agencies such
as AFOSR, ONR, DARPA, and NSF. He is an Elected Fellow of the
American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineers (1996), Elected
Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (1987),
Elected Fellow of the Optical Society of America (1988), Elected Fellow
of American Society for Laser Surgery and Medicine, Elected Fellow of
Washington Academy of Science. He has published more than 110 journal
papers and has given more than 120 presentations. He also has 10 patents.
He has just retired as Editor-in Chief of the IEEE Circuits and Devices
Magazine after twenty years.
Xingjia Wu received a B.S. degree in Biochemical Engineering from
Shanghai University, Shanghai, P. R. China. From 1999 to 2002, she was
a Research Assistant at the Institute of Biochemistry and Cell biology, the
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. Since 2002, she has been
a Research Associate at Uniformed Services University of the Health
Science, Bethesda, MD. Her research is focusing on repair of acute and
chronic spinal cord injury with light therapy and cell transplantation.
Helina Moges received a B.S. degree in Biology from University of
Maryland, College Park, MD in 2004. She has been working as a
Laboratory Technician at the Uniformed Services University of the Health
Sciences since 2003. She plans to pursue a career in medicine in the
future.