km 10.5 to 17.1 Tbilisi-Phonichala - Early Warning System

Initial Environmental Examination

Initial Environmental Examination 2 Document Stage: Final Project Number: 42414

GEO: Sustainable Urban Transport Investment Program, Tranche 2 (Section-3: km 10.5 to 17.1 Tbilisi – Phonichala)

Prepared by Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure under the Municipal Development Fund for the Asian Development Bank.

M

Enginthe

PreparedPreparedDOHWAMinistry

Munici

Initia

eering, Pr Moderniz

d by: Found for:

A Ltd / TRANof Regiona

Kore

pal De

al Env

Sectio

rocuremezation of T

(

Con

A

dation WEG

NSPROJECal Developm

ea

evelop

vironm

on-3: Ph

Vo

ent, ConstTbilisi-Rus(Azerbaija

ntract No:

Fu

Asian DevLoan

G

CT Ltd ment and Inf

GE

G

pment

mental

honichal

olume-1

ruction Mstavi Sectani Border

: SUTIP/C

unded by velopmenn: 2655-GE

frastructure

EORGIA

2012

eorgia

Fund

l Exam

la - Rust

anagemetion of ther) Road

C/QCBS-3

nt Bank EO

e

of Geo

minatio

tavi

ent and Sue Tbilisi-R

3

Geo

orgia

on

upervisioned Bridge

rgia

n of e

TABLE OF CONTENTS pp 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 1 1.3 Methodology for IEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 1

2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2.1 Overview . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.2 Type and Category of Project . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.3 Need for Project . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.4 Location . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.5 Proposed Schedule for Implementation . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.6 Design Criteria and Parameters . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.7 Road Pavement Structure . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.8 Engineering Structures . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.9 Utility Relocation. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.10 Equipment Use During Construction . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.11 A complex of auxiliary building objects . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.12 Quarries . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

2.13 Traffic Management During Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

3. GOVERNMENT POLICY LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK . . . . 26

3.1 Introduction . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.2 Georgian Legislation Related to Environmental Permitting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.3 ADB Environmental and Social Safeguards Requirements (SPS 2009) . . . . . . 30 3.4 EIA Requirements under Georgian and ADB Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.5 Environmental Screening for Current Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.6 Administrative Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.6.1 The Roads Department (RD or RDMRDI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.6.2 Ministry of Environmental Protection (MOE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.6.3 Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development (MoESD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.6.4 Other Responsible Governmental Institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.7 International Treaties and Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.7.1 The Convention on Biological Diversity, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.7.2 The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals . . . 34 3.7.3 Convention on Wetlands of International Importance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.7.4 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and

Flora (CITES) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

4. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

4.1 Physical Resources in Project Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 4.1.1 Climate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 4.1.2 Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 4.1.3 Background noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

4.1.4 Background radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 4.1.5 Information about the surface watercourses and ground pollution . . . . . . . . . . . 44 4.1.6 Topography and Relief . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 4.1.7 Geological conditions of the study area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 4.1.8 Assessment of the Design Corridor Engineering-Geological Conditions by

pickets (kilometers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

4.1.9 Water Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 4.2 Ecological Resources – Landscape and Flora . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 4.2.1 Landscape and Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 4.2.2 Vegetation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 4.2.3 Ecologically Sensitive Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 4.3 Ecological Receptors – Fauna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 4.3.1 General description of fauna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

4.3.2 Description of Biotops in Project Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

5. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

5.1 Demography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 5.2 Socio-Economic Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5.3 Expected social impact of the Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.3.1 General social impact of the Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.3.2 Construction-related social impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.4 Land Acquisition and Resettlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 5.5 Socio-Cultural Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 5.5.1 Historical Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 5.5.2 Cultural Heritage in Project Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88

6. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89

7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94

7.1 Summary of Activities and Anticipated Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 7.2 Specific Environmental Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 7.2.1 Air Emissions Related to Construction Activities and Operation of Highway . . . 99 7.2.2 Noise Factor Related to Construction and Operation of the Road . . . . . . . . . . . 121 7.3 Potential Impacts Related To the Construction Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 7.3.1 Pollution and Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 7.3.2 Impacts on Flora . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 7.3.3 Impact on Fauna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 7.3.4 Protected Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 7.3.5 Landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 7.3.6 Water Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 7.3.7 Impacts on Archaeological Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 7.3.8 Transport related impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 7.3.9 Traffic Disruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126

7.3.10 Quarry-related Impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 7.3.11 Construction Camp-related Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 7.3.12 Construction Related Impacts at the Concrete Plant and Gravel Crushing

Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127

8. MITIGATION & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN. . . . . . . . . . . . 129

8.1 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 8.1.1 Mitigation of Construction Related Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 8.1.2 Mitigation of Long-term and Operation Related Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 8.2 Monitoring and enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 8.3 Costs of Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 8.4 Environmental Management Plan 147 8.5 Environmental Monitoring Plan (Matrix) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160

9. PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165

9.1 Requirements for public disclosure and consultations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165

9.2 Status of Public Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166

10. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173

11. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176

VOLUME II. ANNEXES Annex 1. Legal Framework and Administrative Structure in Georgia

Annex 2. Report of The Environmental Protection Agency on Measurements of Baseline

Contamination Within The Project Area

Annex 3 Modeling of Traffic Related Emissions

Annex 4. Licensed Quarries in Project Area

Annex 5. Procedures for Extraction of Plant Species Included in Red List of

Georgia from the Natural Environment and Change of Category

of Forestry Fund Land

Annex 6. Waste Management Plan for Construction Camps and Equipment Yards

Annex 7. Protocols of Public Consultation Meetings

ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development BankEIA Environmental Impact AssessmentEIP Environmental Impact PermitsEMP Environmental Management PlanHWL High Water Level IFI International Financial InstitutionJBIC Japan Bank for International CooperationJICA Japan International Cooperation AgencyL/A Loan Agreement MAC Maximum Admissible ConcentrationMoE Ministry of Environment Protection and Natural ResourcesNSFSVPP National Service for Food Safety, Veterinarian and Plant Protection ODA Official Development AssistancePAP Project Affected PersonsRAP Resettlement Action PlanRD Roads Department

RDMRDI Roads Department of Ministry of Regional Development & Infrastructure of Georgia

RoW Right of Way RPF Resettlement Policy FrameworkTEM Trans-European MotorwayTOR Terms Of Reference USSR Union of Soviet Socialist RepublicsWB World Bank WEIGHTS AND MEASURES °C degree Celsius ha hectare km kilometre km2 square kilometres litres/s litres per second m metre m2 square metre m3/s cubic metre per second m3 cubic metre mm milimetre s seconds

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

Currency Unit - Lari (GEL) $1 = approx1.637 (March 2012)

NOTE

In this report, “$” refers to US Dollars.

Loan 25655-GEO: Engineering, Procurement, Construction Management and Supervision of the Modernization of Tbilisi-Rustavi Section of the Tbilisi-Red bridge (Azerbaijani Border) Road

i

Executive Summary

Background

The modernization of road section-3 of 6.6 km from Phonichala to Rustavi forms a part of Tbilisi-Rustavi Highway with a total length of 17.1 km is one of the components /sub-projects identified for reconstruction. The Municipal Development Fund of Georgia (MDF) is the project executing, implementing and disbursing agency. The MDF is the Employer and acts on behalf of the municipality and the Road Department of Georgia. The project will focus on the improvement of the existing transport services linking Tbilisi to Rustavi. The Project includes targeted measures and specific facilities such as provision of interchanges, road widening, bus stops, road marking, revetment, stabilization treatment of sanitary area, footbridge or underpass to ensure a quick, safe and reliable bus services and guarantee proper physical connection with metro network at the entrance of the city. The national consulting firm (foundation) WEG has been engaged by DOHWA Engineering co.,�Ltd/Transproject Ltd to prepare and deliver the IEE for Tbilisi-Phonichala Project to MDF.

Scope of Report

The IEE demonstrates and describes the need for this Project. The IEE details the Project concept design, proposed method of delivery and proposed location of the Project. This IEE considers the technical constraints of the Project and by doing so presents the potential positive and negative social and environmental impacts that may result from its implementation.

This IEE presents the following:

� Introduction and assessment methodology;

� Project Description

� Legal requirements;

� Description of existing environment:

� Socioeconomic condition

� Considered Project alternatives;

� An assessment of potential impacts as a result of the Project:

� Proposed mitigation and environmental management plan;

� Environmental Monitoring Program

� Public consultation;

� Grievance Redress Mechanism

� Conclusions and recommendations


ii

Objectives

This Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) has been prepared as part of the ADB supports (ADB Loan 2655-GEO) in undertaking the feasibility/design of the Engineering, Procurement, Construction Management and Supervision of the Modernization of Tbilisi-Phonichala Section. Further, this existing road continues towards the Tbilisi-Red Bridge (Azerbaijani Border) Road up to 17.1 km as end of the Project. The objective of the study is to help the Government prepare and implement an efficient, safe and sustainable transport network, in accordance with international environmental safeguards.

Project Description This IEE Report is prepared for Section 3. Section 3: Phonichala - Rustavi has 6.7km long length of road alignment on the Project. Tbilisi-Ponichala section of the project alignment is entirety located in Gardabani district, Alignment of project road mainly coincides with the alignment of the existing road Tbilisi-Red Bridge. Radii of horizontal and vertical curves, longitudinal and transverse slopes, superelevations correspond to highway parameters according to the Terms of Reference. Design road axis passes on the right shoulder of the existing road. It will be considered upgrading the existing section of the road between the settlement of Phonichala and Rustavi. The existing 2 lanes road will be upgraded to 4 lanes. The width of each lane is 3.75m. The central barrier has 6m width and no sidewalk on this section. Pavement is of concrete. The project will require filling of the existing channel passing in parallel with the road and construction of a new channel nearby. The new road infrastructure includes one bridge over the new design channel and 2 bridges at interchange and 3 interchanges. Construction of the infrastructure will entail acquisition of additional private land and will affect private structures and businesses somewhat. Besides, construction of the road will require replacement of the existing utilities and communication infrastructures either. In addition, the project’s special focus will also be given to the improvement of the express bus services linking Tbilisi to Rustavi, with specific facilities such as bus stops, road marking, footbridge or underpass will be developed to ensure a quick, safe and reliable bus services and guarantee proper physical connection with metro network at the entrance of the city.

Government Policies and Legislation, ADB SPS The Annex 1, presents detail description of the environmental legal framework and administrative structure in Georgia including environmental regulations, measures required and indicates the institutions at the local and national levels responsible for issuing permits, licenses, and enforcing compliance with environmental standards. ADB safeguard requirements; screening and categorization of projects. This Section also provides public consultation procedures; procedure for official submission of EIA/IEE, Rules for construction projects by Government Ministries etc. In addition, information on relevant agencies such as, Road Department, Ministry of Environmental protection, and Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development are assembled as well.


iii

Summary of Findings

This IEE study has identified that there is the potential for both positive and negative environmental and social impacts to occur as a result of the Project. The IEE has determined that comprehensive and effective management and mitigation measures are feasible to be implemented through all delivery phases of the Project. Such measures could feasibly mitigate potentially negative impacts and enhance the identified potential positive benefits. Key potential negative impacts identified in this IEE if unmitigated include:

� Impacts to environments are possible from the accidental spillage, leakage or improper management of hazardous substances such as fuels or oils;

� Wastes generated by the accommodation of personnel living and working on site could pollute nearby environments if improperly managed;

� Noise from project construction activities may affect local people or nearby fauna

� Ecological impact is mainly related with the need of cutting trees along the road widening zone (mostly artificial greenery plantations are to be felled, although some smaller patches of natural vegetation and some individuals of red data species could be affected).

The identified potential negative impacts are likely to be able to be minimized and managed effectively with the implementation of the measures detailed in the Environmental Management Plan. Potentially positive impacts that could result from the Project include, safe driving conditions for transit motor transport flows and local residents and higher carrying capacity of the road. The design road is also very much important for the socio-economic development of the population of Kvemo Kartli region, particularly for the population and industries in the city of Rustavi and Gardabani region. Many of 120,000 residents of Rustavi work or study in Tbilisi. In addition, the modernization of Tbilisi-Red Bridge (Azerbaijani border) road will allow transporting the passengers and various goods to Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan through the improved and modern road. This road will also make Tbilisi and Georgian Black Sea resorts and ports more accessible to the population of Azerbaijan. The community consultation field work resulted in engagement with a large number of stakeholders, across a broad range of socio-economic groups. The main results of this consultation showed that the community is supportive of the proposed Project and perceived benefits of the Project by increasing business and local employment opportunities.

The detailed Resettlement Action Plan is under preparation. At this stage, it can be summarized, that this project will affect as minimum 164 households: 131 AHs are affected directly and 33 are the employees losing their jobs. Project impact is related to permanent take of 132 private land plots with total area of 98580 sqm. Out of this amount 30 are legalizable and 102 with full registration. No crops are cultivated on the affected commercial land plots. Acquisition of only 5 land plots is associated with losses of 54 productive trees. The main impact is related to the loss of structures and businesses. In total 4 major structures and some ancillary facilities will be destroyed, including 1 car washing station, 3 petrol filling stations. 6 legal entities will suffer in terms of business impacts: permanent loss of business facilities According


iv

to the ADB SPS 2009 this sub-project is thus classified as of category A and needs the preparation of a Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP).

Results of this IEE suggest that the proposed Project is likely to be able to proceed without resulting in any negative significant impacts to physical, biological, or socio-economic environments occurring, if appropriate management measures are implemented. As such, the Project will have overall beneficial impact as well as some minor negative impacts that will be carefully monitored and adequately mitigated. Therefore, the completion of this IEE fully meets the MoE and ADB requirements and submitted to MoE to obtain Environmental Impact Permit.

1. INT

1. TheDeveloInvestPhonicone ofFund MDFGGeorgsustai 2. TheTbilisi.road wsafe athe entranspRustavinfrast

3. ThisADB sProcuRustavthe stutransp 4. In athe imobjectoveralfollowiClimatSectio

5. ThiStatemexperibeen rseconDepar

6. Thienviromeasuactivitiof the brough

TRODUCTIO

1.1 Backg

e Governmeopment Banment Progchalato Rusf the compoof Georgia

G is the Emgia. The objenable transp

e project will. The Projecwidening, buand reliable bntrance of thportation provi route catructure main

1.2 Object

s Initial Envsupports (ADrement, Convi Section ofudy is to he

port network,

addition, the mpacts on the

ive is to enl aim is to ing the interte Change t

on 1.2.4 of V

1.3 Metho

s IEE followment, June 2ences of otreviewed. Tdary data rtment, and s

is report coonmental imures and moies during pIEE covers ht about by t

LoMod

ON

ground

ent of Geornk (ADB) uram-Project

stavi forms aonents /sub-(MDFG) is

mployer and ective of theportation sys

focus on thct targeted mus stops, robus serviceshe city. The

oblems in urbausing increntenance an

tives

ironmental EDB Loan 26nstruction Mf the Tbilisi-R

elp the Gove, in accordan

IEE aims toe environmensure that nensure thatrnational reqto which Geo

Volume-II).

dology for

ws the meth2009 (SPS 2ther studieshis IEE is pand informstakeholder

overs the dpacts of pro

onitoring of sre-constructthe natural athe road con

oan25655-GEO:dernization of Tb

rgia signed under a M-1. The ma part of Tb-projects idethe project acts on be Project is to

stem that for

he improvemmeasures anad marking,s and guarae Program wban areas, weasing dela

nd expansion

Examination655-GEO) inanagement Red Bridge

ernment prepnce with inte

o identify theent of the proobody is mt the proposquirements orgia is a si

IEE

hodology ou2009) and ens in preparinrepared basation, field consultation

description ooposed roadselected paration, construand human nstruction/re

: Engineering,Proilisi-Rustavi Sect

a loan agreFF to impl

modernizatioilisi-Rustavi

entified for reexecuting, half of the o develop arms a part of

ment of the end specific f, footbridge ntee proper

was developwhich includays, as a n.

(IEE) has bn undertakingand Superv(Azerbaijanipare and im

ernational en

e likely impaoposed interade worse sed project laid out in Ugnatory (Re

utlined in thenvironmentang IEE docused on revie

visit, discuns.

of existing d project, reameters. Th

uction and oenvironmenconstruction

ocurement, Constion of the Tbilisi

eement of Uement the n of road Highway w

econstructioimplementinmunicipalityn efficient, af the south-e

existing transfacilities sucor underpaphysical co

ped as the de large traff

result of

been preparg the feasib

vision of the i Border) Ro

mplement annvironmenta

acts, both porvention undoff as a resis environmUnited Natio

ef: Short List

e ADB Guidal Laws of thumentation

ew of detaileussions with

environmenecommendee environme

operation phant, their interan activities.

struction Managei-Red bridge (Aze

USD 85 milSustainablesection-3

with a total len. The Mun

ng and disbuy and the Raffordable, aeast route of

sport serviceh as provisiss included

onnection witGovernmentfic volumes previous u

red for Sectibility/design overall Mod

oad of 17.1 k efficient, sal safeguards

ositive and ndertaken by tsult of such

mentally sounons Framewt of the Rati

delines; ADBhe Governmefor transpor

ed design, coh the MDF

tal conditioed managemental impact ases of the action and a

ement and Supererbaijani Border)

lion with thee Urban Tr

of 6.1 kmength of 17.nicipal Develursing agenoad Depart

and environmf the country

es linking Ruon of interchto ensure a

th metro nett’s responsebetween Tbnder-investm

on-3, as paof the Enginernization o

km. The objeafe and susts.

egative andthe MDF. Th developmend and sust

work Convenfied Conven

B Safeguardent of Georgrt sector haollection of p and Envir

ns, assessmment and m

was considProject. The

any induced

rvision ) Road

1

e Asian ransport m from 1 km is lopment cy. The ment of mentally y.

ustavi to hanges, a quick, twork at e to the bilisi and ment in

rt of the neering, f Tbilisi-

ective of tainable

assess he basic ent. The tainable ntion on ntions in

d Policy gia. The

ave also primary, ronment

ment of itigation ered for e scope change

7. Fuplannisite associal surfacbackgimpac 8. SenresultsacquisActionMonito 9. TheprovidpotentEnviroregardenviro

10. Hothe IE

x Enx Hyx Grx Pux La

11. Thand lo

12. Tintervefor deimprovoverpa17.1 k4.0 to from P 13. In bus se

1 The sereconst2Under envisagroad witand the

rther, varioung stages. Sssessment oinformation

ce water, soround noisets of the traf

nsitive envirs of the analsition and ren Plan. Mitigoring Plan

e IEE docues concise tial environonmental Mding particulonmental pol

owever, the E study.

ngineering ydrology round water ublic Healthand Acquisiti

hanks shoulocal people w

2. DESCR

2.1 Overvi

he proposeentions consevelopment vement, coass and undkm is divided10.5km2 an

Phonichala to

addition, thervices linkin

ection 1 (km 0 tructed into 4 lathe Subproject

ges the upgradth alternative a

e end point is K

LoMod

us environmSector expeof the envir

n has been oil and am

e and radiatffic were ana

ronmental alysis were coesettlement

gation meas

ment is struand logical

nmental impanagement ar issues, llution (wate

data from th

on and Rese

d be acknowho assisted

RIPTION OF

iew

ed Project isidered undeof 4 or 61 nstruction oderpasses fd into 3 sectd Sectin-3 iso Rustavi.

e project’s sng Rustavi t

– 4) will be wid

ane road. t 2 (Phonichalaing of the exist

alignments. ForKM 11.


mental activerts conducteonmental cocollected. T

mbient air ation along thalyzed using

and social ronsidered inissues are

ures were i

uctured as l descriptionpacts and Plan (EMP

ike: the repr, soil and am

he following

ettlement

owledged to d in the stud

THE PROJE

s an Inveser this Tranclanes from of new bridfor easy crotions. As sucs 10.5 to 17.

special focusto Tbilisi, wi

dened from 2 c

a subproject) cting road from 2r all of these alt


vities were ed both officondition. A fThe Nationaand analyzehe entire ali

g licensed so

receptors wen design and

submitted ntegrated w

main text an of the env

relevant mP). The annport of the hmbient air),

disciplines

the MDF, cies.

ECT

tment Progche include

existing 2 dges/railway

ossing of thech, Section-.1km. This IE

s will also bith specific f

current lanes to

currently severa2 lane to 4 laneternative option


carried out ce studies afull set of th

al Environmeed them. Thignment for

oftware “Eco

ere analyzed planning of

as a separwithin the En

and annexevironmental mitigation mnexes provihe National the results o

were also re

concerned a

ram under road shouldlanes, pave

y bridges, e local peop1 starts fromEE is develo

e given to thfacilities suc

o 6 lanes, while

al alternative oe and other 3 ons the starting


at the proand field invhe required ental Agenche design the propos

log – Magist

ed in the prf mitigation mrate documenvironmenta

es. The maicondition, s

measures, ide more dEnvironmen

of traffic pollu

eviewed and

agencies, fie

MFF for ther improvemement strenretaining w

ple and animm 0.0 to 4.0 oped for 6.6k

he improvemch as bus st

e sections 2 and

ptions are consoptions considepoint is KM 4.0


oject feasibiestigations environmen

cy took samteam check

sed route. Etral”.

oject area ameasures. Tent – Reset

al Managem

n body of tsensitive recintegrated

detailed infontal Agencyution modeli

d incorporat

eld level per

he SUTIP-Pment, road wngthening, dwalls, interchmals. The lekm; Section

km length Se

ment of the etops, road m

d 3 will be

sidered: the firser construction 0 of the existing

rvision ) Road

2

lity and and on-ntal and mples of ked the

Emission

and the The land ttlement ent and

the text ceptors, in the

ormation y on the ing.

ted in to

rsonnel,

P1. The widening drainage hanges, ength of n-2 from ection-3

express marking,

st variant of 4 lane g road,

footbriguaran

14. Thlane Gas Envenviro

15. GeBlack with neworth Rose infrastinfrastmanag 16. OtransitNationSurveyCaucaimprovin the 17. ByEurasbypasare be 18. IntTranspThe mpassemoderaccesspresen 19. Thlinks tdistrictsatellitis natuwork ocarry t 20. AcInfrastroad maximoften increa

idge or undentee proper

2.2 Type a

his is a road Georgian devironment C

onmental ass

2.3 Need f

eorgia's geoand Caspiaeighboring cmore than Revolution

tructure, whtructure to tged to subst

ne of the Gt country bynal Developy and Desig

asian Roadsvement straturban areas

y now, the coian corridor s is underw

eing develop

ternational rport Corridomodernizationgers and vrn road. Thissible to thent project is

he design The capital ot center Gate city of Tbural if considor study. Ththe whole tra

ccording to ttructure of Gis overloade

mum carryingcauses tra

ased amoun

LoMod

erpass will bphysical con

and Catego

upgrading psign standa

Category B ssessment an

for Project

ographical loan Seas) andcountries is aUS$2 billionin 2002) m

ich had detethe sustainatantially incre

Government’sy improving ment Plan. gn Institute s. This provtegy with ads through wh

onstruction o(E-60 high

ay. At the saped.

road Tbilisi–or. The roadon of Tbilisvarious goos road will a population a part of Tb

bilisi-Rustavof Georgia wardabani. Rbilisi megalopdering that me existing 2affic entering

the data of thGeorgia (hered, with theg capacity offic jams ct of fuel use


be developednnection with

ry of Projec

project fromrd within the

since some and therefore,

ocation positd North-Souan importantn. The Gov

made it a keeriorated sig

able economease investm

s priorities hits East-WeIn the yeaof Georgia

vided a signdditional by-hich the exis

of some secway) highwame time, th

–Red Bridged links Georgi-Red Bridg

ods to Bakualso make T

of Azerbaijilisi-Red Brid

vi section ofwith the majoustavi with polis. Thus,

many Rustav2-lane highwg or exiting T

he Road Dereinafter refee traffic int

of the existincreating majed leads to


d to ensure h metro netw

ct

2 lanes to 4e existing rigadverse issu, an IEE is p

tions the couth (betweent feature of tvernment ofey priority tgnificantly s

mic developmments in the

has been toest Transpors 2003-200prepared a

nificant amoupass optionsting main hig

ctions (Tbilisway is accomhe moderniz

e (Azerbaijangia with Aze

ge (Azerbaij, the capita

Tbilisi and Gjan. Tbilisi-Rdge road.

f Tbilisi-Red or industrial its populatithe travel b

vi inhabitantsway (one in eTbilisi at pea

epartment oferred to as “tensity exceng road is 7.jor discomfo the increas


a quick, safework at the e

4 lanes. Thisght-of-way (Rues of lesseprepared.

ountry at then Russia anthe Georgianf Georgia (wto rehabilitatince 1990. ment of the se sectors.

o develop Gort Corridor 04 Louis Be TACIS fununt of data s to relieve ghway still p

si-Agaiani, Amplished anzation projec

n border) iserbaijan as ani border) l of Azerbai

Georgian BlaRustavi des

Bridge (Azeand admini

ion of 120 between Russ commute oeach directioak hours.

f the Ministry“The RD”), t

eeding 14.0.000 vehicleort for the sed proporti


e and reliabentrance of t

s reconstrucRoW) and cr degree are

e center of bd Turkey) trn economy awhich assumte transportRecognizingcountry, th

Georgia’s coand this is

erger and Tded study ofor the existraffic volum

passed.

gaiani-Igoetnd the constcts of other s

an integralwell as withroad allow

ijan throughck Sea resoign freeway

erbaijani bostrative centhousand p

stavi and Tbon daily bason) has not

y of Regionathe given se00 vehicless a day. Thpassengers

ion of emiss


le bus servicthe city.

ction is to mcategorized e involved w

both East-Wransit routesand estimatemed office at, energy ang the importe Governm

ompetitiveness recognizedTransprojekton Rehabilitsting roads

mes and con

ti, Igoeti-Gortruction of Ksections of t

part of TRh Europe anws transporth the improvorts and pory envisaged

order highwater Rustavi

people is thbilisi is intenssis towards Tenough cap

al Developmection of thes a day, whe overloades. In additision of prod

rvision ) Road

3

ces and

eet four by ADB

with it for

West (the s. Trade ed to be after the nd rural tance of ent has

ss as a d in the t Roads tation of and an

ngestion

ri) of the Kobuleti the road

RACECA nd Asia. ting the ved and rts more by the

ay) road and the

he main se. This Tbilisi to pacity to

ment and e design hile the

ed traffic on, the ducts of

combuadjace 21. Tefrequein the accideTbilisi- 22. Afwill beinternapassesocial-popula 23. TbTbilisi-route turned

2ProjecdistrictRed BsupereRefereconsidRustavThe ceprojecconstrnew dinfrastand bexistin

Table

I

Sec

ustion in thent settled a

echnical parent accidentstraffic intens

ents. In this -Rustavi link

fter the furthe linked to ational stanngers to Tb-economic dation and ind

2.4 Locat

bilisi-Rustav-Rustavi roarecommend

d out to be n

24. Sectionct. Tbilisi-Pot, AlignmentBridge. Raelevations ence.Designdered upgradvi. The existentral barrie

ct will requiruction of a ndesign chantructure will usinesses s

ng utilities an

2.1: Des

Item L

ction 3 6

LoMod

e atmosphereas.

rameters of s leading to sity in terms context, the

k by upgradin

her sections Azerbaijan

ndards. Thisilisi and Blacdevelopmendustries in th

tion

i road is locad is 17.1kmded by the ecessary, in

n 3: Phonionichala sect of project roadii of horiz

correspondn road axis ding the existing 2 lanes r has 6m wiire filling ofnew channennel and 2

entail acqusomewhat. Bnd communic

scription of

Length L

6.6 Km


eric air and

the existinginjuries andof improper

e Georgian ng the road

of the roadn and its cs road will ck Sea ports

nt of the pohe city of Ru

cated in Tbm. Generally

Feasibility n particular:

chala - Rusction of theoad mainly czontal and d to high passes onsting sectionroad will be dth and no sf the existi

el nearby. Thbridges at iisition of adBesides, concation infras

f Section-3

Lane/ Widthsecti

4 lanes/


d deteriorati

g road do nd human tollr conditions Governmeninto a freew

are designecapital Baku

be used s. The desigopulation ofstavi and Ga

ilisi and Gay, the aim ofStudy Repo

stavihas 6.7e project alicoincides wivertical curway paramn the right n of the road

upgraded tosidewalk onng channel

he new road interchange dditional privnstruction ostructures eit

h of cross on

28.5m


on of the a

not meet sa as well as of the road

nt has deciday.

ed and consu through thto comforta

gn road is alf KvemoKarardabani reg

ardabani disf the projectort; howeve

7km long leignment is th the alignmrves, longitumeters acc

shoulder od between tho 4 lanes. T this sectionl passing ininfrastructuand 3 inte

vate land anof the road wther.

Civil wo

InterchaBridg


atmospheric

afety requireeconomic loinfrastructur

ded to impro

structed, thehe modern ably transpolso very mucrtli region, gion.

trict. The let was to lay er, rerouting

ength of roaentirety loc

ment of the eudinal and cording toof the existhe settlemenhe width of e

n. Pavementn parallel wre includes

erchanges. Cnd will affecwill require

orks items

ange : 3EA ge : 3EA


c air quality

ements, resuoss. Sharp inre often leadove the cap

e capital of Groad meet

ort the carch importantparticularly

ength of thethe road al of some s

d alignmentcated in Gaexisting roadtransverse the Terting road.It t of Phonicheach lane ist is of concrewith the roone bridge oConstructionct private strreplacemen

Rem

rvision ) Road

4

y in the

ulting in ncrease

ds to car pacity of

Georgia ting the rgo and t for the for the

e design ong the sections

t on the ardabani d Tbilisi-

slopes, rms of

will be hala and s 3.75m. ete. The ad and over the n of the ructures t of the

ark

Fig

.2.1

Othh

op

ho

to a

nnd

To

po

graa

ph

ic M

ap

oof

the

en

tirre

Tb

ilis

i –

Ru

sta

vi

See

cti

on

of

thhe

Hig

hw

ayy

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

geanage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i BS

up

erv

isio

n

Bord

er)

Road

55

25. Th

Applic

26. DBridge TrafficConstthe de

x x x x x x x x x x x x

27. W45.5mWidth reacheWidth Width Fill sloCut slo Volum 28. howevinterch

2.5 Propos

he Project is

2.6 Design

cation of st

Design loadses and overp

c safety condruction of 6-

esign. TechnDesign MaximuMinimuMinimuCrossfaNumbeWidth oWidth oWidth oWidth oWidth oRoadsid

Roadway

Width of roam.

of dividing ses its peak uof paved shof unpaved

ope adopted ope adoptedmes of earthw

Widths of mver widths hanges are n

LoMod

sed Schedu

scheduled f

n Criteria an

andard

s– Georgian passes

ditions - in aclane road in

nical paramespeed – 12

um longitudim convex cum concaved

all – 2%; er of traffic laof roadway –of carriagewaof lane - 3.75of paved shoof dividing stde - 0.75 m.

adway adop

strip is adopunder the exhoulders is 3

shoulders isis 1:1.5.

d is 1:1.5. works are ca

main lanes, of acceler

not shown (s


ule for Imple

for implemen

nd Paramet

National Sta–Georgian N–Georgian S–SNIP ccordance w Tbilisi and 4

eters adopted0 km/hr; nal slope – urve – 40 00d curve – 40

anes - 4X3.7– 28.5-45.5 may – 2X7.5 m5 m; oulders - 3.0trip - 4.0-17.0.

pted in the d

ted 4.0-17.0xisting overp3.0 m. s 0.75 m.

alculated ac

paved shouration-decelesee in a sep


ementation

ntation over

ters

andards, TENational RoaSeismic Stan

with TEM an4-lane road d for the sec

1.7%; 00 m; 000 m;

5 m; m; m;

m; 0 m;

design for th

0 m. Widenass at PK 14

ccording to th

ulders and roeration lanearate Table)


n

a period of

EM and SNIPad Design Sndards

d SNIP stanafter Tbilisi

ction Ponicha

he road sect

ning of dividi45+60 and e

he design cr

oadside arees to be c).


17 months,

P tandards

ndards. until Rustravala-Rustavi:

tion Ponicha

ng strip starends at PK1

ross profile.

e shown on constructed


starting in 2

vi is envisag

ala-Rustavi

rts from PK 150+50.

the cross-sat junctio

rvision ) Road

6

012.

ged in

is 28.5-

141+00,

ections, ns and

Fig

. IEE

Rep

ort

2.2

Ro

ad

Cro

ss--S

ecti

on

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb:

Eng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n oe

me

nt, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dg

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

epe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

7

2.7 R 29. Robased

xxx

30. Cfuture expecperiod 31. DensuriDesign 32. Bpavemsome non-rigrigid prigid papplie Ta

Road Pavem

oad paveme on the follo

x Trafficx Reliabx Servic

Correspondintraffic flowsted traffic flo

d based on c

Design reliang reliabilityn service life

Both rigid ament structu

advantagesgid paveme

pavement anpavement wd on the sec

able 2.2Rig

Sl. No 1 1 Ceme

2 Crush

3 Sand

LoMod

ment Structu

ent structurewing data:

c flow; bility factor; ce life.

ng works fos for each yeows. Designcalculations o

bility of pavy means unine of paveme

and non-rigidre. Compar

s over non-rnt has the a

nd its re-paviwas applied ction Ponich

id Pavemen

Pa

ent concrete

hed aggrega

and gravel m


ure

e is designed

or determininear of the s

n reliability eof the expec

vement is cnterrupted pnt structure

d pavementrison of pavrigid pavemeadvantage aing shall be on the secala-Rustavi.

nt Structure

Section 3

avement La

2 (pavement

ates (base c

mix (sub-bas


d considerin

ng traffic flostudy were densures goocted traffic flo

calculated foerformance is at least 20

t alternativevement alterent. Howeveas in case lacomplicated

ction Tbilisi-P

e : Pavemen

– Concrete

ayers

t) course) se)


ng technical

ow were cadetermined. d performanows.

or both traffof pavemen0 years.

es were sturnatives idener, within theaying of utilid. ConsiderPonichala, w

nt Layers an

e pavement

T


and econom

rried out, asTraffic load

nce of pavem

fic flows annt for the per

died whilst ntifies that re limits of Tties is requiring the abowhilst rigid

nd Thicknes

t

Thickness olayers

328

25

30


mic paramet

s well as exs are basedment for the

d service lifriod of servic

selecting thrigid pavemTbilisi applicred, cutting ve-mentionepavement s

ss

of pavemens, mm 3 80 50 00

rvision ) Road

8

ters and

xpected d on the e design

fe, thus ce life.

he road ent has

cation of out the

ed, non-shall be

nt

2.8 E Junct 33. Co IntercInterchturn an Recon34. RThe inTbilisi

Interc35. IRustav Param

Param

Param

BridgeList of

BridgeID #

Br 04

Br 05

Br 06

ENGINEERIN

ions and in

onstruction o

change N2 ohange N2 snd local app

nstruction oReconstruct

nterchange wby pass roa

change N4 nterchange vi and Tbilis

meters used - Width- Width- Width

meters used - Width- Width- Width

meters used - Desig- Minim- Maxim- Minim- Minim

es f Bridges in t

e Station(

Beginning

12+528.34 12

12+899.84 12

16+75

LoMod

NG STRUCT

ntersections

of grade sep

on the road hall be cons

proach roads

of Interchantion of the ewas construcad.

N4 shall bei-Red Bridge

for two-way h of traffic lah of paved sh of unpavedfor one-wayh of traffic lah of paved sh of unpavedon ramps ofgn speed – 4mum radius mum longitu

mum convexmum concav

the section-3

(km)

End

2+568.66

2+940.16 B

50 B


TURES

s

parate junctio

section Postructed at Ps with the mo

nge N3 existing intercted at the in

constructede road.

traffic on intane – 3.5 m;shoulder – 1.d shoulder –

y traffic on raane – 4 m; shoulder – 1.d shoulder –f interchange40 km/hr; in plan – 50

udinal slope x radius – 10ved radius –

3

Bridge Nam

BR. 4

BR. 5 (Underpa

BR. 1 (Overpa


ons and inte

nichala-RusPK 128+20. otorway.

rchange N3 ntersection o

d at PK 167+

terchanges:

.0-2.0 m; – 0.75 m. amps:

.0-2.0 m; – 0.75 m. es:

m; – 5%;

000 m; 850 m.

me Supe

Prereinfor

beam

ass) Pre

reinforbeam

ass) Pre

reinforbeam


rsections is

stavi The interch

at PK 145+of internation

+50 at the in

erstructure Type

e-stressed rced concrete ms, L=33m e-stressed rced concrete ms, L=33m e-stressed rced concrete ms, L=33m


stipulated in

hange envis

+58 is envisanal road Tbi

ntersection o

Over

Length

40.32

40.32

139.97


n the design:

ages junctio

aged in the lisi-Red Brid

of approach

rall Geometr

Width

31.60

28.0

19.84

rvision ) Road

9

:

on of U-

design. dge with

road to

ry

Skew

30°�

IEE

Rep

Fig

. 2

.3.S

e

ort

ec

tio

n 3

Laa

yo

ut

wit

h BB

rid

ge

s a

nnd

In

terc

ha

ng

es

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

geanage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i BS

up

erv

isio

n

Bord

er)

Road

10

0

ort

ayo

ut

of

thhe

Bri

dg

es

an

d I

nte

rch

an

ge

on

k

km

12

.5 –

112

.8

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

geanage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i BS

up

erv

isio

n

Bord

er)

Road

11

1

IEE

Rep

Fig

. 2

.5 I

nt or

t

terc

ha

ng

e o

n K

M 1

4.55

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

geanage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i BS

up

erv

isio

n

Bord

er)

Road

12

2

ort

yo

ut

of

thee I

nte

rch

ann

ge

on

km

116

.75

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

geanage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i BS

up

erv

isio

n

Bord

er)

Road

13

3

IEE

Rep

F or

t

Fig

. 2

.7 D

raaw

ing

of

Brri

dg

es

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

geanage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i B

Su

pe

rvis

ion

Bord

er)

Road

144

IEE

Rep

ort

Fig

. 2

.8 D

rraw

ing

of

BBri

dg

es

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

geanage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i B

Su

pe

rvis

ion

Bord

er)

Road

155

IEE

Rep

Fig

. 2

.9 D

r ort

raw

ing

of

BBri

dg

es

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

ge

anage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i BS

up

erv

isio

n

Bord

er)

Road

166

Super36. bridgeseam.Superconstrhas th 37. Tcontinfor thecm. Thconcreplace longituSuperof 8 pdecisioStructMovem Piers 38. Ssitu coPier bcross-shall b 39..Abstructusectiowing-wconcre 40..FoadoptediameConcrgroundcleaneuntil c 2.9 U41. ThprojecConsu Table

No

1

2

rstructure Pre-stressed

es. Beams a

rstructure is ructed directe function o

There are 8uous tempee improved he bridges hete barriers when the

udinal culverrstructure is points earthon). ure of railinment joints a

Structure of poncrete boreody consists

-beams basebe constructe

butments areure of 4 colun of columnswalls and enete parapets

or foundatioed due to l

eter of bored rete bored pd is reacheded, steel reinut-off level o

Utility Reloche Consulta

ct area and hultant has be

9.1: List of U

o Name ofcompany

KazTranaz

BP

LoMod

d reinforcedare united i

strengthenetly on beamf leveling lay

8, 9 and 11erature systeride comforthas sidewalrepresent thcross-fall isrt and on intobased on ru

hquake (bea

g shall be oare with rubb

piers is similed piles weres of 3, 4 reied on themed on cross-

e of one typumns baseds on abutme

nd-walls are s shall be co

n of substrlocal field cpile is 1.0m

piles are cond until the dnforcement of the pile de

cation nt have bee

had quite a feeen under pr

Utility compa

f y Utility

nsG Gas

Oil agas pipel


d concrete bn the cross

ed by meanms. The slab

yer under th

1 beams inem (4 spanst. Thicknessks for mainthe drainage s 2.0%, theno treatment ubber bearinaring parts

of steel secber compens

lar for each e adopted asnforced con

m, with maxi-beams.

pes that typd on raft fouents is identiconstructed nstructed on

ructures, cacondition, en

m for all bridgnstructed bydesign deptcage is plac

esigned.

en in contact ew times of reparation of

anies & utilit

y Type De

Ex11

and

lines

Exde13


beams, lengts-section by

ns of cast operates toe asphalt lay

n the cross-s at most) fos of asphalt tenance. Absystem on n water hafacilities. g parts, whiare adopte

ction. Barriesators (acce

bridge. Colus piers (11 pcrete ellipsemum conso

pe is adopteundation witical to that oon columns

n wingwalls.

ast-in-place nvironment

ges. y Reverse Cth or foundaced into the

with a numbmeetings fof utility reloc

ies relocatio

escriptionof

xisting ĭ531+800 xisting ĭesigned le3+584.20


th L=33m ameans of

in situ reinfogether withyer.

-section. Brir more effecconcrete pautment conebridge. Opeppens unde

ch are calcued in accord

rs are of caeptable in se

umns basedpiles). e-shaped coole length 3

ed for the aph cast in sit

of piers). Reis in accordan

bored pile effect, supp

Circular Drilliation bearinhole and th

ber of Utility or the utilitiesation design

on design co

f Utility Relo

30 Gas pipe

42/46 inevel is 1.


are applied ilongitudinal

forced conch superstruc

idge spans ctive live loaavement on es located an spillway in

er the supe

ulated to reddance with

ast in situ rismic region

d on raft fou

olumns with .6 m. Stops

pproaches wtu concrete inforced connce with the

with reinforply of mate

ng (RCD) mg layer. Aft

hen pour con

companies s relocation wn for the proj

mpanies on

ocation

es cross H

nches BTC85m at H


n superstrureinforce c

rete slab h-cture beams

are united ad performan

carriagewaalong the reinto the cone

erstructure, i

duce seismicthe typical

einforced cons).

ndation with

reinforced cs against se

with high fillbored piles

ncrete cross- design. Rei

rced concreerials and e

method. Driller the hole ncrete into t

which on thworks. The ect site area

Project area

Highway atS

C pipes fHighway S

rvision ) Road

17

cture of concrete

-10 cm, . It also

in one nce and y is h-7 inforced es takes into the

c impact design

oncrete.

h cast in

concrete eismicity

s- it’s a (cross--beams, inforced

ete was etc. The

ling into is then

the hole

e

a.

a

STA.

from STA.

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Road Traffic42. Coguide regula Road 43. Insafety signs ISO/E

GWP

JSC Tela

ENERGOPRO Georgia

SINATLIQALAQILTD andrelevant organizas in Rustand GardabaCaucasuOnline

Silknet

AkhaliKsbi

CGC

FOPTNE

Deltacom

Furniture a

c regulationonstruction posts and

ations and sa

signs

nstallation of on Tbilisi-Rshall be doS, ASTM sta

LoMod

Watesuppsewa

asi Powsupp

O- Powtranson lin

S

d

ationtavi

ani

Electpoles

us Inter

Interand telep

sele Tele

Cabl

ET Cabl

m Cabl

and Equipm

ns and safeof dividing ssteel guard

afety.

f standard IRustavi roadone accordandards.


Exlev

er ply and age

Exfro

er ply

ExST

er smissines

ExHiExHi16

tric s

Ex0+Ex11

rnet Ex10

rnet

phone

ExHi

phone Ex10

les ExHi

les Exto

les Exto

ment

ty strip, installadrails shall

II-type size d PK 105+0ing to the


xisting ĭ 4vel is 3.535

xisting ĭ80om STA. 10

xisting 6KVTA. 10+500xisting 11mighway fromxisting 9m ighway from6+831

xisting light+000 to STAxisting light1+400 to ST

xisting inte0+500 to ST

xisting inteighway from

xisting telep0+500 to ST

xisting interighway from

xisting cablSTA. 17+2

xisting cablSTA. 17+2

ation of roadbe done un

road signs i0-PK 171+0requirement


42 inches S5m at Highw

00 Water p0+500 to ST

V cables a0 to STA. 17

m concrete m STA. 1

concrete tm

ting poles tA.4+000 ting poles tTA.17+100

ernetlines trTA. 17+200

ernet andm STA. 10+

phone linesTA. 17+200

rnet and telm STA. 10+

es track Hig200

es track Hig200

d signs, pavnder the pre

s envisaged00 (Ponichalts of GOST


SCP pipes way STA. 1

ipes along TA. 17+200

long track 7+200 transmissio2+702 to S

transmissio STA. 1

track Highw

track Highw

rack Highw0

telephon+500 to STA

s track High0

ephone line+500 to STA

ghway from

ghway from

vement maresent projec

d in the desila-Rustavi). T 10807-78,


from desig3+595.70

track High0

Highway f

on towers tSTA. 16+83on towers t11+565 to S

way from S

way from S

way from S

e lines tA. 17+200

hway from S

es track A. 17+200

m STA. 10+

m STA. 10+

rking, installct to ensure

ign to ensurInstallation

, GOST 17

rvision ) Road

18

gned

hway

from

track 31 track STA.

STA.

STA.

STA.

track

STA.

+500

+500

ation of e traffic

re traffic of road

7918-80,

Framethicknealumin 44. Ttype, urequire

-

-

45. Istipulatbe instedge oroads i

-

-

The roshall b

•

•

46. Plon full-- - Carria47. Hplastic9001,

D- Cont- Cont- Dou- Brok- Brok- Mark- Brok- Mark- Mark- MarkTotal h Road 48. RaccordTotal (signareinforprofileposts and pdecisio Sidew

es of standess 1.2mm.num frame.

The images using appliqements of A

Standard -Of individu

nstallation oted under thtalled on shof carriagewais: - Standa- Individoad signs shbe fixed on s

• 76 mm – 8• 102 mm –

lates of road-frame struct

Steel full-frSteel three

ageway MarHorizontal linc with light r EN 1423, EDesign inclutinuous linestinuous linesble continuo

ken lines, (1.ken lines, (1.king of crossken lines, (1.king 1.13, 1.king 1.18 lenking 1.19 lenhorizontal lin

Barriers Road fencdance with rlength for s

al) posts on srced concret

e – 64 units. is given on

plastic guideons adopted

walks, Bus S

LoMod

ard road s Road signs

shall be apqué method ASTM, EN 12- 86 units; ual design - 1of II-type s

he present doulders on ay should be

ard II-type sdual – 2 unitshall be insta

steel posts, d89 units;

45 units.

d signs of intures. rame structue-post struct

rking ne marking oreflecting glaEN 1424, BAudes: s (1.1) widths of side maous lines (1.3.5) ratio 1:3, .6) ratio 3:1, s-road, broke.8) l1=l2,width13, 1.16.1; 1

ngth of arrowngth of arrowne marking –

cing shall brequirement

section 1 anshoulders - 7te barriers o Location of correspond

e (signal) pd in the desig

Stops and S


signs are cos of individu

plied on plawith cutting

2899 standa

19 units. size road siesign. Standcondition the at least 0.

ize - 149 uns. alled on spediameter 76-

ndividual des

ure - 6 units;ure - 9 units

of carriagewass balls, thAST (Germa

100-150 mmrking (1.2), w3) width 150 width 100-1 width 100-1en lines, (1.7

h 200-400 m1.16.2; 1.16w 5.0 m-7.5mw 5.0 m-7.5m– 13029.6 m

be constructs of standand 3 is 9188722 units, p

on the dividinf road signsding drawingposts are gign ensure pr

Shelters


onstructed fual design a

ates with ligh on plottersrds.

igns on subdard road sighat the dista.5m. Total n

its;

ecial berms-102 mm, th

sign shall be

s.

way shall be ickness 2 mn standards

m – 671.5 mwidth 100-15-150 mm - 1

150 mm– 10150 mm – 277) l1=l2,width m, l1=1.0m, l.3, 1.20 –11

m– 1771.3 mm – 270.1 m

m2.

cted from strds GOST 28 L.m. Deslastic guide ng strip - 19

s, pavement gs. Details oiven on corroper traffic


from steel are construc

ht-reflecting in advance

bsidiary (jungns and roa

ance betweeumber of sig

outside the ickness of w

e fixed on st

carried out mm (to meet

).

m2 50 mm – 719150 m2 046.5 m2 7.3 m2 100mm – 40l2=3.0 m – 6772.5 m2

m2 2

teel guardra23457-86, Gsign envisag(signal) pos

9639 linear mmarking, fe

of road signrresponding regulations


profiles galted from alu

film of „3M“e. The film s

nctions, inted signs of in

en the edge gns to be in

road bed. wall 4 mm.

teel structur

with two-cot technical re

91.2 m2

0.1 m2 74.1 m2

ails (cinolalpGOST 26804ges installatists on markinm, concrete ncing and p

ns, pavemenschemes.

and safety.


lvanized wituminum pro

“ engineerinshall meet te

ersections) ndividual des

of the signstalled on s

Standard ro

res (three po

omponent stequirements

pol covered4-86 and ENion of plasting line - 100parapets oflastic guide

nt marking, The activiti

rvision ) Road

19

th zinc, file with

ng-prism echnical

roads is sign shall n and the ubsidiary

oad signs

osts) and

tructural s of ISO

d) f-3 in N 1317. ic guide 04 units, f special (signal) barriers ies and

49. SRustavBust ssectiodesign ConstPrepa50. Dwater reloca 51. PpreparThe pr

x x x x x x

52. Tplanta Earthw53. FiCut voSpoil tFilling emban 54. Tkilome 55. Tand se Blasti56. NRustav

Remo57. Pfrom k Waste 58. Vaproducexpecpollutio59. Mroadwconstr Waste

idewalks arevi cities and

stops with acn. Constructn at PK 114+

truction woaratory workDuring the ro

supply andate. The utilit

rior to startinratory worksreparatory w

Fixing of roRelocationTree fellingFelling andDisassembFreeing the

The project ations within

works ill volume –2olume - 1148to be dispos

materials nkments - 28

he volumes eter-based s

he project eeeding peren

ng works o blasting wvi road.

oving the toPrior to makkm19,490m3

e Generatio

arious wastcing areas ated along ton.

Milling of the way. About ruction of the

e Classifica

LoMod

e not construserve as co

cceleration-dtion of shelte+56 and PK

rks ks

oad construcd sewarege ties subject f

ng the road s. works includeoad layout an of the utilitig - about 40d digging oubly of the exe building si

also envisthe ROW (c

285,080 m3. 820 m3 ed –95,330 to be tran

85,080 m3

of earthworpreadsheets

envisages scnnial grass.

works are en

psoil ing the subgin total and

n

es will be pare: construthe access

existing asp11,880 m3

e road pavem

tion


ucted for theonnecting higdeceleration ers and footb137+31.

ction, the exipipes, pow

for relocation

construction

e: and construces 00 trees t of bushes -isting buildinte for the roa

sages givingcomlte imple

m3 nsported fro

rk accordings of earthwo

cattering and

nvisaged dur

grade, the pd further usin

produced thction sites aand heavy

phalt concreof milled ament.


e section 3, ghway. lanes shall

bridges on b

isting utilitieswer lines, opn were listed

n works, the

ction corridor

- 1,4 ha ngs and premad construct

g out the cmentation o

om quarries

to the kilomorks.

d leveling of

ring the cons

project envisng it to seed

hroughout thand constru equipment

ete pavemensphalt shou


as the whole

be constructboth sides of

s and commptical-fiber cd above.

e project env

r - 6.7 km

mises and ation off arche

compensatioof the LARP)

and borro

meters and t

the vegetat

struction of T

sages cuttin perennial g

he constructction campst movement

nt shall be duld be store


e alignment

ted on Ponicf the road is

munications cables, etc.,

visages the a

ll related woeological rem

ns for land.

ow pits for

ypes of trea

ion ground l

Tbilisi-Ponic

g the humurass over th

tion processs. Small amt routes wit

done prior toed in reserv


is out of Tb

chala-Rustavenvisaged i

infrastructurwill be nec

accomplishm

orks mnants.

plots, prem

arrangeme

atment are g

ayer over th

chala section

us soil layer he fill slope.

s. The mainmounts of wath ground a

o the construve and reu

rvision ) Road

20

bilisi and

vi road n the

re, such as cessary to

ment of the

mises and

ent of the

iven in the

he fill slope

n of Tbilisi-

for 15 cm

n waste aste are and soil

uction of used for

60. Dux Hox Hax Nox Ine

Inert b61. Geinert deand suconstru

x

x

The sagreem 2.10 62. ThighwaConstAir Proused b Table

2.11. A 63. T(structcarryincompl

uring the conousehold; azardous indon-hazardouert

uilding matenerally, theebris - fill of ubject to plauction of the

The mill ofurther useOnly a parleast 95,33

sites of placment with th

Equipment

Table - 2.2 ay. The acturuction Contotection for before const

2.2 Typical

Sl.No

1 Bu2 Fr3 Ti4 M5 Tr6 Ba7 Vi8 Pn9 Ta

10 Vi11 Cr12 Fu13 Fu14 Pa15 Co16 M17 W18 Cr19 Co

A complex

he constructture, contentng out the cex of auxilia

LoMod

nstruction, th

dustrial; us industrial;

terials. e major prop

the cut grouacement. Tdesign road

of the existined for asphart of the gro30 m3 spoil acement of

he local auth

t Use During

provides a ual machinetractor. Any temporary c

truction begi

l List of Equ

Equipmen

ull Dozer witront loader pper-Dumpeotor Grader ruck Excavaack Hoe bratory Rollneumatic Roandem Rollebratory Screrusher ully Automatully Automataver Finisheompressor obile Genera

Water Tank wrane oncrete Pavof auxiliary

tion contractt, location, donstruction ary building


he following

portion of thund and cla

The total amd section, is ng pavemenlt pavement

ound generaand cliffy mainert wasteority.

g Construct

list of the ry to be utiliemission ap

concentrations.

uipment for

nt Type and

th Ripper

er

tor

erollerereen

tic Batching tic Hot-Mix P

er with Electr

ator with sprinkle

ver With Elecy building ob

tor will makedesigning, etworks along objects bu


types of was

e remains gstic rocks, a

mount of inlittle as comnt layer - 1or repairs o

ated in the saterial will bee will be se

tion

typical equzed for the cpprovals reqns will be o

r Constructi

d Characteri

Plant Plantronic Sensor

r

ctronic Sensbjects

e a decisiontc.). Despite g other sectiilt, including


ste will be p

generated inand debris nert building

mpared to oth1,880 m3(m

of other roadsection cuts e disposed oelected by

ipment that construction

quired underbtained on t

ion Activity

istics

r

or

in connectiothis, by conons of E-60

g a construc


roduced:

n the road cot used for materials

her road secmust be plac

sections) will be use

off. the constru

will be usen will be the r the Georgiathe basis of

y

Minimum requi

4 3 6 2 1 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1

on to the ausidering the

0 road, we suction camp


construction constructiongenerated d

ctions: ced as a re

d to make t

uction contra

ed to constrresponsibilitan Law on Aactually ma

Number ired

uxiliary buildi existing expuppose therto place 20

rvision ) Road

21

process is n purposes during the

eserve and

the fills. At

actor in

ruct the ty of the Ambient achinery

ing objects perience in re will be a 00 workers

(coverheavy 64. Dcontraplant. In chaconditof opti 2.12 Q 65. Id(Contrand boplans descriand trlocatequarrie

ring approxi techniques

Decision onactor: he ma

apter 8.1.1.1ions used tomal location

Quarries

entification ractor). Befoorrow pits toand specif

be existing oransportationd in the projes and filling

LoMod

mately 1.5 (covering a

constructioay chose to

3 of EIA relao design andns.

of qauerriesore start up o be used afications. Atopportunitiesn of materiaect area, wh

g materials p


ha area), trpproximately

on of the Cuse existing

ated to the md operate the

s and borroof constructnd reflect tht the same s for fill mateals. Here bhich could beproduced are


ransport andy 2 ha area)

Concrete Prog suppliers o

mitigation me above-men

ow pits is retion activitieshis in the des

time, befoerial supply

below, we de used for pe given in An


d equipmen) (bulldozers

oduction Plaof concrete

easures, wentioned build

esponsibility s the Contrascription of c

ore engagingand potentia

describe sevroject. Detainnex 4.


nt yard for 1, excavators

ant will be tor install hi

e described ding objects

of the Civiactor has to constructiong Contractoal impacts reveral quarrieiled informat


100 vehicless, cranes, et

taken by cos own conc

the procedu, as well as v

l Works Codefine the q

n works and or, the IEE elated to expes and borrtion related t

rvision ) Road

22

s and 150 c.).

onstruction cretemixing

ures and variants

ontractor quarries in work should

ploration row pits to these

Figure

2.13TR

e- 2.10 Qua

RAFFIC MA

LoMod

rries and B

ANAGEMEN


orrow Pits

NT DURING


in Project A

CONSTRUC


Area

CTION



rvision ) Road

23

66. Rconstrplan m 67. ThTherefundersvehicle 68. MconstrDue tolane cLane ctraffic 69. Fowherebe acc 70. Tlanes Utilizalanes loads. duringsigning The ty

Sho

Sho

DO

ATe

Guid

Fig. 2. 71. Dzone, AlternaThe Cresidelocatioidentif

oad construruction zone mainly for co

he frequencyfore the primstand the trae in a safe m

Maintaining thruction progro the excesslosures mighclosures on for both lane

or the higheeas for the otceptable.

Traffic shiftinare retained

ation of the srequires tha Re-gravellin

g constructiog must be p

ypical layout

oulder

oulder

OWNSTREAM TAPER

Ter

AB

Information sign:"Road Works Ahead"

Advance Warning Areaells traffic what to expect ahead

Lets topera

des traffic back to its original travel p

11 Traffic Ma

During constthereby affeative access

Contractor shents along thon and duratfied and alte

LoMod

ction will nofor the main

nstruction of

y of crashesmary consideaffic control amanner.

he full carryiresses, travesive traffic voht not be co2-lane road es on a 1-lan

r trafficked rther project

g is one of td and narrowhoulder as t

at the shouldng and sealin and permirovided to g

of traffic shi

30m MAX

rmination Area

Warning sign andspeed limit

traffic resume normalations

ath S

TRANSITION

anagement D

ruction acceecting accesss should be hall give writte right-of-wation of each rnative acce


t disrupt norn road. The f the interch

s in work zoneration in woand have ad

ng capacity el lanes are olumes on thnsidered to will general

ne roadway.

road sectionroad section

he least disrw lanes, whiltemporary trer pavemenng of the exit the safe muide drivers

ifting to the s

WORK

LONG

Ac

Whe

et aside for workers, equipment and

Provides workers =

Traffic SpaceLANE W

N

During Const

ess to drivews and parkinprovided whten notificatiay of the conconstruction

ess provision


rmal traffic ocontractor hanges where

nes is disproork zone trafdequate time

is usually noeither narrow

he project romaintain traly require sh.

s shifting trans the use of

ruptive worke reducing saffic lane in

nt is able to axisting should

movement of to the temp

shoulder is p

ZONE

GITUDINAL BUFFER

ctivity Areaere works takes place

material storage

protection for traffic and= Stopping sight distance

e: Allows traffic to passthrough the acWIDTH 3m

truction

ways could teng for the adhere feasibleon to all landnstruction scn activity. Pons shall be m


operations anas to prepare the local tr

oportionatelyffic control ise to make de

ot possible dwed, closed

oad sections ffic complete

hifting traffic

affic to the shf alternating

k zone stratespeed, have order to ma

adequately sder is requirtraffic at a r

porary should

presented in

TRANSITIONWs

Moves traffic out of itsnormal path

ctivity area

T

SHOU

emporary blojacent busin

e, with guide downers, tenchedule, andotential obstrmade, if feas


nd travellingre detail traffraffic is conc

y higher thans safety. If drecisions, the

during const or reroutedat the desig

ely out of theto the shoul

houlder shoutraffic on 1-

egies since thminimal effeintain the sasupport anticed to sustaineasonable sder lane.

n the figure b

Advance WarnTells traffic what to exp

A

Info"Roa

Warning sign andspeed limit

TRAFFIC MANAGETWO LANE R

LDER AND TRAVE

ocked by theness and res

signs to infonants, busind shall explaruction to thesible.


through a fic managemcerned.

n at other locriver can eas

ey will operat

ruction perio.

gn interchange constructiolder or provid

uld be considlane roadwa

he same numect on capacame numbercipated traffin the traffic lspeed. Adeq

below.

Shoulder

Shoulder

ning Areapect ahead

B

rmation sign:ad Works Ahead"

EMENT PLANROADEL LANE CLOSED

e constructiosidences. orm the pub

ness operatoain the exact eir access sh

rvision ) Road

24

ment

cations. sily te their

ods. As

ges, on area. de

dered, ays may

mber of city. r of c load

quate

on

lic. ors, and

hall be

Public72. Astrategtelevisinconvactivitiˍ� Adˍ� Ad

sitˍ� M

wo

The pthe suonTbilTo minon crit

c informatioAccurate andgy for managsion, can greveniences. Kies are: dvance noticdvanced nottes are dormotorist accepork zones

ropose traffubproject (seis-Phonichanimize thesetical sites are

LoMod

on d timely repoging a work eatly improveKey benefits

ce might enctice might en

mant ptance migh

fic managemection 1 and

ala and Phone risks we pre carried out


orting of projzone. The u

e the public’of a public i

courage usencourage us

ht reduce spe

ment schemed section 3)nichala-Rustropose to spt at one sect


ect informatuse of resous perceptionnformation p

rs to seek aers to travel

eeding and o

e solves the). However, tavi subsecti

plit constructtion at the sa


tion is a valurces such asn and acceptprogram ass

n alternative at off-peak

other aggres

e traffic disruthe simulta

ions may creion scheduleame time.


uable elemens newspapetance of necsociated with

e route arountimes, or wh

ssive driving

uption problneous execeate additiones in a way t


nt in the overs, radio, an

cessary delah constructio

nd the projechen construc

g behavior in

ems within cution of civnal traffic prothat intensiv

rvision ) Road

25

erall nd ays and on

ct ction

n

each of il works oblems.

ve works

3 GO 3.1 73. Anin Geoat thecomplpermitsystem 3.2 74. At The pPermitEcolog 75. Iprovedlegal r

76. T2005. and heIt alsopermit(Article 77. Lawsprecent 78. TPermitexamienviroenviro 79. IConstensureprocedLaw oEcologadminadopteconditConclu 80. Constthe Enby theon EcCondit

OVERNMEN

Introducti

nnex 1 descorgia includine local andiance with tting processms.

Georgian

present, theroject propots (2005); (gical Examin

n line with td by Decreerelations ass

The Law onThe new L

ealth, and ao regulates ts, and define 1, Paragra

The Laws published ont Georgian le

he Law on t determinenation (clau

onmental asonmental imp

n case if theruction Permes involvemdures initiateon Licensesgical Examiistrative boed by the ions of the usion on Eco

In case if ruction Permnvironmentae minister. Thcological Extions of the

LoMod

NT POLICY

on

cribes in detang environm national leenvironmens in Georgia

Legislation

e environmeonent, in imp(ii) The Lawnation (EE) 2

he mentionee No. 14 of Osociated with

n Licenses aaw regulateddresses spactivities re

nes the procaph 1).

on Environ 14.12.200egislation.

Environmes the compuse 4 p.1) sessment, epact permit.

e activity incmit, the admiment of Moed for the ps and Permnation of thdy issuing administrativConclusion

ological Exa

the activitymit, based onal Impact Pehe ecologicaxamination Permit.


LEGAL AN

ail the enviromental regulaevels respotal standarda, ADB safe

n Related to

ental permittiplementing pw on Enviro2008.

ed laws, a pOctober 4, 2h the assess

and Permitses legally orgpecific state equiring lice

cedures for i

onmental I7 and in fo

ental Impactplete list of

and the leecological e

cluded into tinistrative booE, as a spurpose of ismits. In suchhe project b

the Permit.ve (executivn is obligatoamination are

y included in the Conclu

ermit, suppoal examinatioand the co


D ADMINIST

onmental legations, measonsible for ds. Below iseguard requi

o Environme

ng procedurprojects, willnmental Im

rovision “On2011 of the sment of env

s was adopteganized actor public int

enses or pessuing, revis

mpact Perrce since 0

t Permit:Ththe activitie

egal basis fexamination

the list givenody responsseparate adssuing Consh cases theased on the. The Concve) legal acory for the e a part of co

nto the list usion on therted by the on is carriedonditions se


TRATIVE FR

gal framewosures requireissuing per

s a brief derements, an

ental Permit

re in Georgial comply witpact Permit

n the environMinister of

vironmental i

ed by Parliaivities posinterests, incluermits, detesing and ca

rmit and E1.01.2008.

e Law of Gees and projfor public p

and decisio

n in clause 4ible for issuadministrativestruction Pee MoE is ise documentclusion on tct of the Mproject proponditions of

given in ce Ecological

administratid out in accoet forth by


RAMEWOR

ork and admed and indicrmits, licensescription ofnd the differe

tting

a is set out ih (i) The Lats (EIP), an

nmental ImpEnvironmenimpacts.

ament of Geg certain th

uding usageermines typenceling of lic

Ecological These new

eorgia on Enects subjec

participation on making

4 p.1 at the ance of the Ce body, in ermit, as it isssuing the tation providthe Ecologi

MoE and coponent. Thethe Constru

clause 4 p.1Examinationve (executiv

ordance withy the Conc


RK

ministrative scates the insses, and enf the environences betwe

n three lawsaw on Licensd (iii) The

pact Assessmnt and regula

eorgia, on Jreats to hum of state reses of licenscenses and

Examinatiolaws integr

nvironmentact to the ec

in the proon issuance

same time rConstructionthe admin

s envisagedConclusion

ded to MoEcal Examinompliance we conditionsuction Permit

1 does not n the MoE wve) legal acth the law of Glusion pres

rvision ) Road

26

structure titutions nforcing nmental een two

s: ses and Law on

ment” is ates the

une 24, man life sources. ses and permits

on: The rated all

l Impact cological cess of e of an

requires n Permit istrative

d by the on the

by the ation is

with the s of the t.

require will issue t issued Georgia ent the

81. Ththe reenviropropon Curre82. B

Public 83. ClproceddisclosAccordits subrequireissuingdiscus Proce 84. Arbe sub

(1)

(2)

he aforemenesponsibilitieonmental impnent in cons

nt LegislatiBelow is the

1994 1996 1996 1996 1997 1997 1997 1997

1998 1998 1998 1999 1999 2003 2005 2007 2007 2007

c Consultat

ause 6 of thdures for csure and disding to Articbmission to es a construg a construssed more fu

edure of Off

rticle 8 of thebmitted by a) A written s

Licenses a) The follow

(a) An Georgia [in(b) A s(c) Volthe stationproject ofsubstance(d) A b(e) A s

LoMod

ntioned lawses of partiepact and prosultation with

ions Relatedlist of laws r

Soil ProtecSystem of Minerals EnvironmeWildlife Tourism anWater ProtTransit andTerritory ofResorts anDangerousPesticides AtmospherForest CodRed List anLicensing aEnvironmeEcological Cultural He

tion Proced

he Law on Eonducting p

scussion. cle 6, the de

an adminisuction perm

uction permiully in this do

ficial Submi

e Law on En operator tostatement toand Permits’ing informatEIA/IEE rep

n 5 hard copsituation planlume and tynery sourcef maximums [in 4 copie

brief descriptstatement ab


s do not proes. Screeninoposed mitigh the MoE.

d to Envirorelevant to e

ctionProtected A

ental Protect

nd Resortstectiond Import of Hf Georgiand Sanitary Ps Chemical Sand Agroch

ric Air Protecdend Red Dataand Permitti

ental Impact Expertise

eritage

ures

Environmentpublic consu

eveloper is ostrative body

mit this mustt. The deta

ocument in C

ission of EIA

nvironmentao obtain a po the Ministr. ion: port drawn

pies and 1 son of the planypes of the ees of pollutim permissibes]) tion of the acbout the conf


vide details ng of projeation measu

nmental Penvironmenta

Ares

ion

Hazardous W

Protection ofSubstanceshemicalsction

a Book of GengPermit

tal Impact Pultations an

obliged to cay responsibt be done bailed descripChapter 9 on

A/IEE to Mo

al Impact Peermit: ry under the

up under thoft copy] nned activity expected emon and emble concen

ctivity (as a fidential part


of screeninct proposal

ures (scoping

ermitting al protection

Waste within

f the Resort

eorgia

Permits provid establishe

arry out publle for issuin

before initiatption of Pubn Public Con

oE

ermits specif

e rules esta

e standards

(with the indmissions (a

mitted/dischantrations of

technical sut of the subm


g procedurels, preliminag) are carrie

:

and into the

Zones

ides detailedes timefram

lic discussiong a permit.ing stage 2

blic Disclosunsultation an

fies the doc

blished by ‘

s specified b

dication of dtechnical rerged harmff emitted/d

mmary) mitted statem


e and do noary assessmed out by the

e

d requirememes for info

on of the EIA. Where an

of the procure requiremnd in Annex

uments whic

‘Law of Geo

by the legisl

istances) eport of inveful substancischarged

ment.

rvision ) Road

27

ot define ment of e project

ents and ormation

A before activity

cess for ments is 1.

ch must

orgia on

ation of

ntory of ces and harmful

(3)

Issuan 85. Aran En“Licen

Either only in Regul 86. Thand reThe pdocumsourcetheir econclu 87. Ta busideveloabout busineThe asand in

- - - - -

The obof the 88. T Article The E

(a)(b)(c)

(d)

) An operatoissuing bopart of thebe submitt

nce of the P

rticle 9 of thenvironmentases and Per

1. Accissu

2. Moof tExa

the Environ

n case of the

lation on EI

he Provision egulates the procedure t

mentation ane of expecteenvironmentusion.

The given Priness actor topment. It p

the purposess actor. ssessment odirect impachuman’s renatural andhistorical msocial-econassessmenexpected r

bjects of envGeorgian La

The content o

e 5. Content

nvironmenta) Analysis of) Identifying ) Forecast o

environme) Determinin

expected r

LoMod

or is obligeddy even if t statement,

ted separate

Permit on E

e Law on El Impact Permits” (2005

cording to thuing Permit

oE, in accordthe submitteamination.

nmental Pere positive co

A issued by

is proved bylegal relatioto assess nd permits fed environmtal, social a

rovision definto ensure th

precedes thesefulness of

of the envirocts in the conesidential spd modified emonuments anomic factornt of the erisks. vironmental aw “On Envi

of the EIA do

of the enviro

al impact assf the existingthe sources

of the changeent; ng the probaresults;


d to submit the given acaccording to

ely by the op

Environment

nvironmentaermit. The ) and “on Ec

he law on “within the 20

dance with ted documen

mit, or Consnclusion of t

y the MoE d

y Decree Noons associate

the envirofor the businental impacand econom

nes the proche environme decision of the busine

onmental imntext of the p

pace and heaeco-systemsand cultural rs; existing stat

assessmenironmental P

ocument is s

onmental im

sessment reg state of thes, kinds and es of quantit

ability of eme


a full diagractivity contaio sub-clauseerator.

tal Impact

al Impact Peissue is alscological Exa

“Licenses an0 days of thehe law on E

ntation and

struction Pethe Ecologic

dated Octob

o. 14 of Octoed with the anmental imnesses on tt, its nature

mic outcome

cedure to draental and so

of the Ministess and rel

pacts coversplanned actialth; vegetat; landscapesvalues;

te of geolog

t are the actPermit”.

specified in t

mpact assess

eport should e environmeobjects of im

tative and qu

ergency situa


am of the tens a comme ‘e’ of claus

ermits descrso addresseamination’ (2

nd Permits,”e permit req

Ecological Exthe Issuanc

rmit (when tcal Examinat

ber 4, 2011

ober 4, 2011assessment

mpact includthe legally eand degree

es in obtain

aft the enviroocial-economtry of Envirolevant proje

s the identifiivity and studtion cover ans, air, water,

gical and h

tivities on the

the clause 5

sment

include the ent; mpact causeualitative cha

ations due to


echnological ercial and/ose 2 of the g

ibes the proed in the la2008).

” the MoE tauest by the xamination,

ce of Conclu

the latest is tion.

1 of the Miniof environm

des draftingestablished e and integraning the en

onmental asmic balance onmental Proect to be im

ication and ddy of their ond fauna; , soil, climate

hydrological

e list under

5 of the Regu

following inf

ed by the actaracteristics

o the activity


cycle to theor state secrgiven Article

ocedures foraws of Geo

akes a deciproject propensures the

usion on Ec

required) is

ster of Envirmental impacg the confilist, identify

ated assessnvironmental

ssessment reof future ec

otection of Gmplemented

description outcomes on

e;

environmen

clause 1 of a

ulation as fo

formation:

tivity; s of the

y and evalua

rvision ) Road

28

e permit ret. This e should

r issuing orgia on

ision on ponent. e quality cological

s issued

ronment cts. irmatory

ying any sment of l expert

eport by conomic Georgia by the

of direct :

nts and

article 4

llows:

ating the

(e)(f)

(g)(h)(i)

(j)

(k)(l) (m(n)

Decreprojec Figure

date:

date:

date:

date:

date:

) EvaluationSpecifyinghuman hea

) Identifying ) Undertakin

Analysis ofnew varianIdentifying terminating

) Informing tPlan for th

m) Identifying ) Forecast o

factors; e also requi

ct and at the

e 3.1 Disclo

LoMod

n of the envir the reductioalth and spethe residua

ng environmf the alterna

nts; the ways an

g entreprenethe society ae post-projethe kinds an

of the expect

res developend of the a

osure and E


ronmental, son measuresecifying the cl (cumulativeental and ec

ative variants

nd means toeurship or otand studyingect situationand quantitiested environm

ment of the activity.

Environmen

1. Announewsp

2. Copy ocopy oNGOs&

Follow

no earl

Public cincorpora

objectionsen

All com

EIA repthro

Envir

Environmeafter regist


social and ecs for the negcompensatioe) impact anconomic evas of the proje

o restore the ther activity; g the public oal analysis; s of the expe

mental state

Monitoring P

ntal Impact

uncement paper aboutof Draft EIAof Draft EIA & offices of

Withinanno

and r

ing an annoco

lier than 50

WPrepa

conscomments aated into ths, written gnt to the au

mments and the fi

n

port is finaliough MoESDronmental Im

d

ental Impacttration of th


conomic resugative impacon measuresnd measuresaluation of thect implemen

initial enviro

opinion;

ected emissgained throu

Plan during t

Permit Proc

in the nat proposed

A report subreport sent

f local autho

n 50 days foouncement r

commentsrecommend

ouncement onsultation

and no late

Within 5 daare minutes

public sultation mand recommhe EIA reporgrounded reuthor of the

concerns tnal EIA rep

next 15 day

ized and suD together wmpact Permocuments

t Permit isshe incoming

MoE


ults of the plct on the envs as necessas for its contrhe projects; ntation, sele

onmental co

ions; ugh the env

the impleme

cedure

ational anactivities;

bmitted to tht to websiteorities.

ollowing receive s dations

conduct pu

er than 60 d

ays s of the

eeting mendations rt; if there a

esponse shocomments.

to be reflectort

ys

ubmitted to with all othe

mit applicati

sued within g applicatio


lanned activvironment anary; rol and mon

ection and fo

ondition in ca

ironmental im

entation of th

nd local

he MoE , e,

ublic

days.

to be are any ould be . ted in

MoE er ion

20 days on by the

rvision ) Road

29

vity; nd

itoring;

orming

ase of

mpact

he

off

icia

l p

roc

ed

ure

& a

cti

vit

ies

Rules 89. In(08/23an entissuedrequiredescri 3.3 AD 90. Acthe PrprocesAssesto the type, sresourenviroC, or F 91. Scat the purposimpacresour 92. Esignificthe cacumulscrutinenviro(i) Catsignificunprecfacilitierequire(ii) Caadversprojecin moscatego(iii) Caminimrequire(iv) Cainvest 93Invoinvolveplan wdegreeand (ii

s for Constr

n accordanc3/2006), whetity acting od. The projecements set bed above.

DB Environ

ccording to roject is classs of determ

ssment (REAproject init

size, and lorces in proj

onmental impFl) based on

creening anearliest stagse. Screenints or risks thrces required

nvironmentcance of a p

ategory of itsative, and in

nized as to itonmental imptegory A. A cant adversecedented. Tes subject toed. tegory B. Ase environm

cts. These imst cases mitiory A projectategory C. Aal or no adved although ategory FI. Ament of ADB

oluntary Ree involuntary

will be prepare of impacts) the vulnera

LoMod

uction Proj

ce with paraere construcn behalf of ct document

forth unde

mental and

ADB Safegussified as ca

mining a proA). REA requiation. REA

ocation of thject area; apacts. A projn the most en

nd Categorizge of projectng and categhat a project d for the saf

t Categorizaproject’s pote most enviro

nduced impats type, locapacts. Projecproposed p

e environmehese impact

o physical wo

A proposed pmental impacmpacts are sigation measts. An initial

A proposed pverse environ

environmenA proposed B funds to or

esettlementy resettlemered that is co

s shall be deability of the


ects by Gov

agraph 1a ction is carriMinistry, notation and thr the Rules

Social Safe

uard Policy ategory “A”

oject’s envirouires the comuses secto

he proposedand the poject is classinvironmenta

zation. ADBt preparationgorization is might prese

feguard mea

ation. ADB uential enviroonmentally sacts in the prtion, scale, acts are assigroject is clas

ental impactsts may affecorks. An env

project is clasts are less aite-specific, sures can beenvironmen

project is clanmental impntal implicatiproject is clar through a F

: ADB will scent. For a proommensurattermined by affected pe


vernment M

of the Deced out by a Permit for

he review pros and Cond

eguards Re

Statement and therefo

onment catempletion of t

or-specific sc project; se

otential for ified as one

ally sensitive

B will carry oun when sufficundertaken

ent; (ii) identasures; and (

uses a classnmental imp

sensitive comroject’s areaand sensitivgned to one ssified as cas that are irrect an area larvironmental

ssified as caadverse thanfew if any of

e designed mntal examinaassified as caacts. No envons need toassified as cFI (paras. 65

creen all prooject involvinte with the e

y (i) the scoprsons. For F


Ministries

ree N 160 Ministry of the Construocedures sh

ditions for Is

equirements

(2009) and ore an EIA iegory is to pthe environmcreening chensitivity andthe project of the four e

e component

ut project sccient informato (i) reflectify the level (iii) determin

sification syspacts. A projmponent, inca of influenceity and the mof the follow

ategory A if iteversible, dirger than theimpact asse

ategory B if in those of caf them are irmore readily

ation is requiategory C if vironmental be reviewed

category FI if5-67).

ojects to deteng involuntaextent and depe of physicaFI projects, s


of the Geothe Governction is requ

hould, howevssuing Cons

s (SPS 2009

Operationals required f

prepare a Rmental categecklist, takind vulnerabilit

to cause environmentt. Categories

creening andation is availt the significaof assessme

ne disclosure

stem to refleect’s catego

cluding direce. Each propmagnitude ofwing four catet is likely to hiverse, or e sites or essment is

its potential ategory A rreversible, ay than for red. it is likely toassessmend. f it involves

ermine whetry resettlemegree of the

al and econosee paras. 65


orgian Govement of Geuired to be fver, comply struction Pe

9)

l Manual Fl for the Projeapid Environ

gorization fong into accoty of environsignificant atal categories are as follo

d categorizatable for thisance of poteent and instie requiremen

ct the ory is determct, indirect, posed projecf its potentiaegories: have

and

o have t is

ther or not thent, a resett

e impacts. Thomic displace5-67.

rvision ) Road

30

ernment orgia or formally with the

ermit as

(2010), ect. The nmental rm prior

ount the nmental adverse

es (A, B, ows:

tion

ential itutional nts.

mined by

ct is al

hey tlement he ement,

94. Incommpositivtimely affectemeanidocum(i) for ereports(ii) draframewand/or(iii) finexami(iv) enreportsreceip 3.4 95. T Table

# 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

3.5. E96. InreconsEnvirodrafted

nformation Ditted to work

ve or negativmanner, in

ed people anngful inputs

ments on its wenvironments at least 12

aft environmeworks and/or plans beforal or updatenations, res

nvironmentals submitted

pt.

EIA RequiThe following

3.1 EIA

Action Screening

Scoping

Draft EIA

Public Consultation

Final EIA

ManagemenPlans Review andApproval

Disclosure ofinal EIA nvironmentn line with struction ofonmental Imd.

LoMod

Disclosure:king with theve) about soan accessibnd to other sinto project

website: t category A

20 days befoental assess

or plans, andre project ap

ed environmeettlement plal, involuntaryby borrower

irements ung Table pres

A Requireme

GeoProjewith Not rvolun

To bCons

ns The publPubland consfromConsdurinincorexplaare d

nt No cconte

MoE

of Not r

tal Screeninthe legisla

f the Internmpact Permit


: In line with e borrower/clcial and env

ble place, anstakeholdersdesign and

A projects, drore Board cosment and red draft Indigeppraisal; ental impactans, and Indy resettlemers/clients du

nder Georgisents EIA req

ents Under

rgian Legisect ProponeMoErequired. Contarily by Pr

be prepared sultant.EIA should ic review duication of infregional ma

sultation not the date of sider all comng public conrporate acceain rational wdisregarded.

clear guidelinent and timin

E

requested

ng for Curreation of Genational andt to be issu


ADB’s Publlient to ensu

vironmental sd in a form a

s, including timplementa

raft environmonsideration;eview frameenous Peopl

t assessmendigenous Pent, and Indigring project

ian and ADquirements u

Georgian a

slationnt in consult

ould be condoject Propon

by Environm

be availablering 45 daysformation in ss-media. Alater than 60publication.

mments recensultations, epted remarkwhen the co.

nes on formang

ent Projecteorgia, the d National

ued and an


ic Communiure that relevsafeguard isand languaghe general p

ation. ADB w

mental impac

ework, draft res planning

nts and/or inieoples plans genous Peopimplementa

B Procedurunder Georg

and ADB Pro

Atation B

Pducted nent.

OCP

mental TE

e for s. central

Arrange 0 days

ACtt

eived

ks and omments

CBtIcra

at, IMBtGPo

activities remotor roaEnvironmen


ications Polivant informassues is madge(s) underspublic, so the

will post the f

ct assessme

resettlementframeworks

itial environmupon receipples monitortion upon

res gian and AD

ocedures

ADB RequirBank and CoProject PropObligatory. BConsultant hProponent To be prepaEnvironmenAt least two Category A the scoping the draft EIA

Consider all Bank and puthe Bank onIncorporate comments arational wheare disregarIncorporate ManagemenBank and sethe EIA is reGeorgian legPublication (of the final E

elated to thads and higntal Impact


cy, ADB is tion (whethe

de available tandable toey can provifollowing saf

ent

t s

mental pt; ring

B peocedure

rementsonsultant hir

ponent Bank and hired by Proj

ared by tal Consultaconsultationprojects – onstage and o

A.

comments fublic. Agree each raisedaccepted pu

and explain en the commrded. Monitoring a

nt Plans in theparately - Mequired by gislation)(mainly elect

EIA.

he construcghways neAssessmen

rvision ) Road

31

er in a

ide feguard

es

red by

ject

ant.ns for ne at

one for

from with

d point.ublic

ments

and he EIA.MoE (if

tronic)

ction or eds an nt to be

The penvirowidenADB to catecatego The fosimilarrequirethe ADthe Mo PublicSPS 2 3.6 Ad 3.6.1 M MDF MDF hthe finexercisuperv

MDF wother tare sethe LA(iv) enexternprompAPs, wneedetasks t

97. ThRDMRroads,reconssignific Thus, tasks 3.6.2 M 46. Thin Georgregulaof the

roject is notonmental siting from a 2SPS 2009 -egory B. Preory projects.

ormat of reqr, with somements, oneDB IEE formoE dated Oc

c consultatio2009.

dministrativ

MDF and th

has overall nancing andse its functivision to ens

will be respotasks MDFG

ent to ADB fARPs; (iii) esnsuring pro

nal monitorinpt allocation will maintained. In order the Program

he Roads DRDI) is respo, managemstruction ancance, utilizi

the RDMRDin relation w

Ministry of

he Ministry o

gia except nation by Mini

Ministry as t

LoMod

related to tes. The pro

2-lane road t- Provision oeparation of

quired IEE fme minor e environmemat and in cctober 4, 201

n is necessa

ve Framewo

he Roads De

responsibilitd supervisioons and wil

sure impleme

onsible for aG will be respfor review, (stablishing nper internal

ng agencies.of LAR bud

n the coordinto give MD

m will provide

Department onsible for e

ment of roand maintenaing funds fro

DI is responwith the curre

Environme

of Environme

natural resostry of Enerthe compete


the developmoject envisato a 6-lane r

on the Envirof the Initial E

for ADB anddifferences. ntal assessm

compliance w11. The Geo

ary in line w

ork

epartment (

ty for the Pn of all LARl be responsentation of a

all LAR taskponsible for ii) hiring andneeded LAR monitoring. MDFG willgets from thnation on alFG the neee to the MDF

of Ministry laboration o

ad and trafance of theom the state

nsible for thent project.

ntal Protect

ent Protectio

ources whichgy and Natuent authority


ment of newages the mroad and coonmental anEnvironment

d EIA for MIn order

ment documwith the req

orgian versio

with the legis

RD or RDM

roject. This R tasks andsible for theall safeguard

ks both at c(i) screening

d supervisinR capacity ing; and (v) h also provid

he Governmel LAR relateded capacit

FG the need

of Regionaf policy and ffic related

e roads of budget, law

e implemen

tion (MOE)

on is respons

h under theural Resourcy are:


w territories oodernization

onstruction ond Social Satal Examinat

Ministry of Eto harmon

ment will be puirements o

on will be ent

lation of Ge

MRDI)

includes End for cross-a general ma

ds tasks.

central and lg the projectg the consu

n each Munihire, followinde all needeent of Georged activities,ty to carry oed training.

al Developmstrategic plaissues an

public use wns, grants a

ntation of roa

sible for all e

e recent chces of Georg


or constructin of the exof relevant inafety Policy, tion docume

Environment nize the ADprepared. Itof Regulationtitled as EIA

orgia and re

nvironmentaagency cooanagement o

ocal governts and ensu

ultants that wicipality wheng ADB recd documentgia and furth, and will enout these mu

ment and Infans related tnd construc

of internatand other fin

ad operation

environment

anges in 20gia (MoEP).


ion on the sxisting road,nfrastructurethe project

ent is require

of Georgia DB and Gt will be prepn on EIA iss

A.

equirements

al Managemordination. Mof the plann

nment level. ring that thewill prepare/ere LAR is recommendatitation to ensher paymentngage in traiultiple and c

frastructure to developin

ction, rehabtional and ancial sourc

n and maint

tal protection

011 are suThe respons

rvision ) Road

32

sensitive i.e. its

e. Under belongs ed for B

is very Georgian pared in sued by

of ADB

ent and MDF will ning and

Among e LARPs execute elevant; ion, the sure the ts to the ining as complex

(RD or g motor

bilitation, national

ces.

tenance

n issues

bject of sibilities

x

x

x

x

47. Cothe mestimaof the to conAgencnaturaheritagcontrosuperv 48. Nainformmeteoprovidreserv 3.6.3 M 49. Mconclufor sucompl State ArchiteEcono 3.6.4 O 50. Ththe cobe carMonum 51. ThMinistmeasuburial and Penviro 3.7 Int 3.7.1 T

To intermienvironme

To issue a

To control

To receivewaste man

onnected wientioned m

ation of influeminister) to trol realizati

cy of Protecal monumenge districts a

ol territories ovise, preserv

ational Envirmational docorological ane state secu

ves and the B

Ministry of

oESD is reusion of indeupervision oetion of con

supervisionecture and

omy and Sus

Other Resp

he Ministry oonstruction arried out in ament Protec

he “Nationary of the Aures in casesites should

Plant Protectonmental offi

ternational

The Conven

LoMod

t, limit, or sent.

series of lic

the executio

e free and nagement et

th projects oinistry of ecence on envlet out the p

on also. cted Areas: nts, manageand wetlandof multilaterave, rehabilita

ronmental Auments, for

nd geodynamurity, existinBlack Sea te

Economy a

sponsible foependent exver construstruction.

n of constrConstructio

stainable De

onsible Go

of Culture, Mactivities in oa historic sitection and Spo

l Service foAgriculture ise of identificd be delivertion” of the cer) and RD

Treaties an

ntion on Bio


stop any ac

censes and p

on of mitigat

unrestricted tc.

of the actioncological exvironment anpermission t

This Agened reservess of internatal usage, to ate and prote

Agency (estaecasts and mic process

ng and expeerritorial wat

and Sustain

or carrying xperts) and iscting activit

ruction andon Inspectioevelopment o

vernmental

Monument Porder to protees or zones ort is also re

or the Foodss responsiblation burial red to the “N

Ministry ofDMRDI field o

nd Conventi

ological Div


ctivity having

permits (incl

tion measure

information

ns presentedxamination and prepares to influence

cy is respos, protectedtional importimplement aect them.

ablished 29 warnings re

ses, also enected hydro ers, to provi

able Develo

out the revssuing Permies and for

compliancon (MACI), wof Georgia.

l Institution

Protection anect archaeolof cultural h

equired for is

stuffs Safetyle for implesites during

National Sef the Agricuofficer.

ions

versity, 1994


g or likely to

uding for en

es by the de

n from the d

d to ecologicand, examinthe documeto environm

onsible for sd landscapetance. The mactivities of l

August 200egarding to

nvironment pmeteorologide civil aviat

opment (Mo

iew of techmits on Cons

arranging

ce monitorinwhich is op

s

nd Sports islogical heritaheritage, conssuing const

y, Veterinaryementation og earthworksrvice for thelture by the

4


o have adve

vironmental

veloper.

developer m

cal examinane, organizeentation (the

ment. This de

state reserves, biosphemain tasks oooking after

08) is responexisting an

pollution conical forecasttion with me

oESD)

nical documstruction for Acceptance

ng is proviperating und

s responsibleage. In casensent of the truction perm

y and Plantof complex s. Informatioe Foodstuffse Constructi


erse impact

impact).

monitoring s

ation, departes discussio

project of thepartment is

ves, nationare reserves

of the agencr protected a

nsible for prnd expectednditions in oting of rivers

eteorological

mentation (inprojects, as

e Commissio

ided by thder the Min

e on superv if constructMinistry of

mit.

t Protection”sanitary pro

on about suss Safety, Veon Contacto

rvision ) Road

33

t on the

ystems,

tment of n of an he order obliged

l parks, s, world cy are to areas, to

reparing d hydro-order to s, water inform

ncluding s well as on after

e Main nistry of

vision of ion is to Culture,

” of the otection spicious

eterinary or (field

52. Intin Geointernaaccepto begbenefi The Cbiodivebeen rglobal GeorgCauca One InternaOne oOne oOne o 3.7.2 53. ThCMS throug2000 t

•

•

•

54. TafacilitaGeorg 3.7.3 55. TConvethe coThe coFebrua1997 i 3.7.4

56. Cagreemspecimdegreethe co

ternational corgia. Settinational coopting responsgin using biots from biod

Convention ersity conserecognised a context -ac

gia as a part asus, is reco

out of 34ational);

out of 200 vuout of 221 enof the World A

The Conv

he Conventioor Bonn Co

ghout their ratogether with

Agreement

AgreementContiguous

Agreement

aking into acating the impgia is mostly

Conventio

The Convenention aims onservation aonvention wary 2, 1971,n Georgia.

Conventio(CITES)

ITES is onement betweemens of wildes of proteconvention wa

LoMod

cooperation ng the goal tperation, Geosibility to safological res

diversity.

on Biologicervation, necas holding according to tof the

ognized as:

4 biological

ulnerable econdemic bird hAgro biodive

ention on th

on on the Convention) aange. It wash its three ag

t on “Protect

t on “Consers Atlantic Ar

t on “Conser

ccount, that plementationreflected in

on on Wetla

ntion on Wto provide tand sustaina

was develope, and came

on on Intern

e of the largen governmd animals action to moreas agreed u


is a dominato preserve orgia signedfeguard the nources in a

cal Diversitycessitates than important the surveys

ly richest

oregions (WWhabitats (Birersity Center

he Conserv

Conservationaims to conss signed in 1greements:

tion of Popu

rvation of Cerea “(ACCOB

rvation of Af

the Agreemn of the CMimplementa

ands of Inte

Wetlands of he framewoable use of ed and adopinto force on

national Tra

gest conservments. The c

nd plants doe than 33,00upon in 1973


ant feature aits biologica

d the Convennation’s rich

a sustainable

y is the fire sustainabreservoir ofand assess

and endan

WF); d Life Internrs.

vation of Mig

of Migratorserve terres1979 in Bon

lations of Eu

etaceans of BAMS);

frican-Eurasi

ments have bMS, the comation of the A

rnational Im

Internationork for nationwetlands an

pted by particn December

ade in Enda

vation agreeconventions oes not thre00 different 3, and CITE


and driving fal diversity antion on Bio diversity of e way and t

rst global ale use of biof biodiversitysments cond

ngered lan

ational);

gratory Spe

ry Species ostrial, marinenn (Germany

uropean Bat

the Mediterr

ian Migrator

been initiallympliance witAgreements.

mportance

al Importannal action annd their resocipating natir 21, 1975. I

ngered Spe

ements in eaim is to en

eaten their sspecies of a

ES entered


force for envand realisingological Dive

plant, animato ensure e

agreement, ological resoy, which is vducted at an

d ecosyste

ecies of Wil

of Wild Anime and aviany.) Georgia

s” (EUROBA

ranean Sea,

ry Water bird

y designed ah and enfor

nce, also cnd internatioources, espeions at a meIt entered in

ecies of Wil

existence, it nsure that insurvival andanimals andinto force o


vironmental g the importersity in 1994al, and microequitable sha

which, alonources. Georery importan

n internation

ems (Conse

d Animals

mals (also knn migratory ratified the t

ATS);

, Black Sea a

ds” (AEWA).

as an instrumrcement of

called the onal cooperaecially as waeeting in Ramto force on J

d Fauna an

is an internternational d it accords d plants. Then 1 July 19

rvision ) Road

34

reforms tance of 4. Thus, obial life aring of

ng with rgia has nt in the al level,

ervation

nown as species treaty in

and

ment for CMS in

Ramsar ation for aterfowl. msar on July 06,

nd Flora

national trade in varying

e text of 75. The

date oon De

of accession cember 12,

LoMod

for Georgia1996 in Geo


a was Septeorgia.


mber 13th,


1996 and th


e agreemen


nt entered in

rvision ) Road

35

nto force

4. DES 4.1. P 4.1.1. Accordhumidwarm winter Tempmonthabsolu Atmosrainy mrespecdisappfrequeIn the precip

Diagra Table The m

M

Pea

Avera

Avera

Pea

Prec

The taTbilisi

SCRIPTION

hysical Res

Climate ding to the c subtropicalclimate, tran

r). Below, we

erature. Thh (January) ute maximum

spheric premonths and ctively. Avepears on Maent in Tbilisi w

Diagram bepitation frequ

am 4.1a. Ave

4.1b Climat

main climatic

Month k high °C

age high °C

age low °C

ak low °C

ipitations, mm

ables below weather sta

LoMod

N OF THE EN

sources in P

climatic zoni climatic zonnsient from se give the br

he average is +0.90C anm is +400. Th

ecipitationsMay and Ju

rage annuaarch 1. Thewith about 5

elow we giveuency in Tbil

erage month

ic data for T

characterist

Jan Feb 19.5 22.4 26.0 7.4 -2.2 -0.9

-24.4

-14.8

19 26

show the clation.


NVIRONME

Project Area

ing, the citiene. The terristeppe to morief climatic d

annual temnd that of thhe soil freez

s. The averaune, with the

al humidity ie maximum 5 occasions e detailed inisi:

hly temperat

Tbilisi

tics are give

Mar Apr M

28.7 34.3 312.1 18.2) 22.4 7.4 1-

12.8 -4.8 1

30 51

limatic data


NT

a

es of Tbilisi aitory of the doderately hudescription o

mperature ishe hottest ming depth is

age and ane average pis 66%. Snof daily pre

a year on avformation ab

ture and prec

n in the tabl

May Jun Ju

34.9 38.7 4023.4 27.5 30

2.2 15.7 19

1.0 6.3 9.3

78 76 45

based on th


and Rustavi design road umid (with hoof the area:

12.70C. Thmonths (July

5 cm.

nnual precipprecipitation ow cover aecipitations verage. bout the ave

cipitation fre

es below.

ul Aug Sept

.0 40.3 37.9

.8 30.8 26.0

.0 18.6 14.7

3 8.9 0.8

5 48 36

he continuou


are includeis character

ot summer a

he temperaty-August) is

itations is 5amount of 8

appears on is 130 mm

erage month

equency in T

t Oct Nov D

9 33.3 27.2 20 19.8 12.9 7 9.2 4.1 -

-6.4 -7.1 2

38 30

us observati


d in the modrized by modand moderat

ture of the +24.40C, w

505 mm. Th86 mm and December . Intense ra

hly temperat

Tbilisi

Dec Year

24.0 40.37.5 18.7-0.2 8.4

-20.5

-24.4

21 498

ions (1881-1

rvision ) Road

36

derately derately tely cold

coldest while the

he most 72 mm, 30 and

ains are

ture and

1960) of

I I

0.9 2

0

I 2

I II 104

110

I III I

2.6 6.6 1

I II -23 -14

F

I II 18 22

I II III0 3 8

II II7 34 4

LoMod

F

III IV 149

170

MIV V

11.9 17.3

Fig.4.1.3 A

III IV -13 -4

Fig. 4.1.4 A

III IV 29 32

F

IV V 15 22

Fig. 4.1.6

II IV V48 55

Fig. 4.1.7


Fig.4.1.1 Du

m o n V VI

211

253

Fig. 4.1.2

M o n t hVI VII

21.1 24.

Absolute min

M o nV VI 1 7

Absolute ma

M o nV VI 35 38

Fig. 4.1.5 So

M o nVI V

2 27 3

Absolute ma

M o n tV VI 64 69

Absolute m


uration of su

t h sVII VIII272

264

2 Air temp

h sI VIII I

4 24.2 1

nima of atmo

t h sVII VIII9 9

xima of atm

t h sVII VIII40 40

oil surfase te

t h sVII VIII IX31 30 2

axima of soi

t h sVII VIII70 69

inima of soil


unshine (hou

IX X 206

170

erature qC

X X

9.6 13.8

ospheric tem

IX X1 -5

ospheric tem

IX X 38 33

emperature q

X X 23 15

l surface tem

IX X 62 51

surface tem


urs)

XI XII 110

93

XI XII

7.6 2.8

mperatures qC

XI XI -7 -1

mperatures q

XI XII 27 22

qC

XI XII 7 2

mperaturesqC

XI XII 36 28

mperaturesqC


Annual Total

2112

AverageAnnual

12.7

C

AnnuaII 9 -23

qC

Annual

40

Annual

15

C

Annua

70

C

rvision ) Road

37

AnnualAmpli-tude

23.5

al

a

I -2

I 2.

I 2.

I 6

II II26 -16 -

Nth Nt

26

II II.2 2.7 2

II II.0 2.2 2

I II 16 22

II II8 87 8

LoMod

II IV V15 -6

Fig. 4

cth/E E 3 4

II IV V2.8 2.8

Fig. 4.1.10

II IV V2.9 2.5

Fig. 4.1.

III IV 31 52

Fig. 4.1

II IV V88 130 1

Fig. 4.1


M o n tV VI -1 6

4.1.8 Annu

c a r d iSth/E

25

Fig. 4.1.9

M o n tV VI 2.5 2.5

Mean num

M o n tV VI 1.4 1.1

.11 Averag

M o nV VI 86 72

.12 Maxima

M o n tV VI 198 220

.13 Minima

M o n t


t h sVII VIII8 8

ual repetition

n a l pSth

8

9 Wind spe

t h sVII VIII2.8 2.3

mber of stron

t h sVII VIII1.0 1.1

ge atmosphe

t h sVII VIII48 37

al atmosphe

t h sVII VIII175 203

al atmosphe

t h s


IX X -1 -8

of wind dire

o i n tSth/W W

2

ed (m/sec)

IX X 2.1 2.0

ng wind days

IX X 1.0 1.0

eric precipita

IX X 42 42

ric precipitat

IX X 179 139

ric precipitat


XI XII -13 -22

ections

sW Nth /W

4 28

XI XII 1.7 1.8

s (t15m/sec

XI XII 1.2 1.3

tion (mm)

XI XII 35 22

tion (mm)

XI XII 126 83

tion (mm)


Annua

-26

W Calm

33

Averag Annua

2.4

c)

Annua

19

Annual

505

Annua

767

Annua

rvision ) Road

38

al

eal

al

al

al

I 0

I 7

I 5.

4.1.2 The av At prelocate2009 aAgmasthe amlead (P 4.2 – point. 4.2 CAgmamaxim

II II0 0

I 23

II II3 69 6

II II.2 5.4 6

Air Quality

vailable dat

esent the Nad in Agmasand at preseshenebeli Ambient air: tPb) and low

4.6 Charts

hart. Aveashenebeli mum allowa

LoMod

II IV V1 5

Fig

II III 27 30

II IV V66 62

F

II IV V6.1 8.6

y

ta on the ai

ational Envirhenebli, Tseent only CO

Avenue is in the total amlevel ozone

show the a

erage montAvenue in

able concen


V VI 5 3

g. 4.1.14 M

M IV V

43 109

Fig. 2.1.15

M o n tV VI 64 60

ig. 42.1.16

M o n tV VI 12.4

14.8

r quality in

ronmental Aereteli and M and SO2 coa relatively

mount of parte concentrati

mbient air p

thly concen 2008-2010ntrations.


VII VIII1 0

Maximum da

o n t hVI VII 126

80

Relative air

t h sVII VIII56 57

Air absolute

t h sVII VIII17.2

16.7

Tbilisi

gency moniMoscow aveoncentrationbetter conditiculate matons.

pollution leve

ntrations o0. They ar


IX X 1 4

aily precipita

sVIII IX 147

77

r humidity (%

IX X 64 73

e humidity (m

IX X 14.2

11.0

tors the air enues. The ns are meastion measur

tter, carbon

els in Agma

of particulare compare


XI XII 1 0

ation

X XI 57 75

%)

XI XII 77 76

mb)

XI XII 8.2 5.9

quality in Tblast two oneured. The oring the follooxide, Nitro

ashenebeli A

te matter (ed with th


241

XII 46

Averag Annua

66

Averag

10.5

bilisi in threees were instbservation

owing paramogen dioxide

Avenue obse

(PM) measue average

rvision ) Road

39

eal

e

e points talled in point at

meters of e (NO2),

ervation

ured in e daily

4.3 ChAvenuconce

4.4 CAgmamaxim

4.5 CAgmamaxim

hart. The aue in 2008-entrations.

Chart. Theashenebeli mum allowa

Chart. The ashenebeli mum allowa

LoMod

average mo-2010. They

e average Avenue in

able concen

average Avenue in

able concen


onthly concy are comp

monthly n 2008-2010ntrations.

monthly cn 2008-2010ntrations.


entration opared with

concentrat0. They ar

concentrati0. They ar


of carbon othe averag

tion of sre compare

on of nitrre compare


oxide (CO) ge daily ma

ulphur dioed with th

rogen died with th


in Agmashaximum all

oxide (Se average

oxide (Ne average

rvision ) Road

40

enebeli lowable

SO2) in e daily

NO2) in e daily

4.6 Ch2008-2conce

The fo

x

x

In 201which nation ProjecWithinthe Enevaluadata oshowinabstra

hart. The av2010. They entrations

ollowing can the concenwhich has standards slightly lowThese meathe Nationaof the maxiThe data othe trafiic is

10 CO concis quite far al standard.

ct study datn the limits onvironmentaation of the eof the projectng the resu

act.

LoMod

verage monare compar

be concludentrations of

heavy traffin 2004-201

wer than the asurements al Environmimum allowaof 2010 shows heavy, exccentration wa

from the ci.

ta of the presenl Agency. Texisting situat impact analts of the a


thly concenred with the

ed based onCO, SO2, Nfic and is l0. The lead national stanare carried ental Agenc

able concentwed that CO

ceeded the nas within thety center. H

nted EIA, thhe objectiveation on a paalysis and traair sample a


ntration of le average d

n the availabNO2 and parocated in thconcentrati

ndard. Low-lout only in

cy the concetration (MACO and NO2 national stane limits of th

However, NO

he air samplee of the air particular proaffic pollutio

analysis is g


ead (Pb) indaily maxim

ble data on thrticulate mahe center oon has decrlevel ozone Agmashene

entration of tC). concentratio

ndards. he national

O2 concentra

e analysis opollution anaoject site, whon. The repogiven in Ann


n Agmashenmum allowab

he ambient atter in Agmof Tbilisi exreased sincemeasuremeebeli Avenuthis pollutan

ons in Tsere

standards iation in this

on 4 project alysis is to ghich can be uort of the Envnex 2. Below


nebeli Avenble

air quality inashenebeli

xceeds the e 2008. andents started ie and accot is within th

eteli Avenue

n Moscow Aarea excee

sites was mgive an approused to forecvironmental w, we give

rvision ) Road

41

nue in

n Tbilisi: Avenue national d is now in 2010. rding to

he limits

e, where

Avenue, ded the

made by oximate cast the Agency a short

Table Resulinstan

ʋ

ʋ 3

ʋ 4

MAC

As thethe es

Fig. 4 4.1.3. ExistiIn MaaccomDigomOld T

4.2 ts of measu

nt (single-sh

Simeas

3 Rustav(13,5km

4 Rustav(17,7kmRustav

C

e Table showstablished no

.2 Air samp

Backgroun

ng informatarch of 200mplished testmi massif in wTbilisi in De

LoMod

uring the pohot) maxim

ite of urement

i Highway m) i Highway

m) i entrance

ws, the indicorms.

pling sites

nd noise

tion about t04, the Instt studies in twindless weaecember of


olluting subumsadmiss

t0

Hum

3.2

3.6

cators of ba

the backgrotitute of Gethe residentather. The s2005. The


bstances in sible conce

midity%

D

30 0.

34 0.

0

ackground e

ound noise eophysics otial areas at same group e averaged


the atmospntrations (M

Conce

Dust C

.072 0.9

.104 1.6

0.5 5

emissions alo

in Tbilisi of the Acad

night and bmade similanoise does


pheric air. CMAC)

entrationmg

O NO2

98 0.04

66 0.08

.0 0,2

ong the proj

demy of Scy day, in pa

ar measurems not excee


Compared w

g/m3

2 SO2

46 <0.1

82 <0.1

2 0,5

ject road ar

ciences of Garticular at 8 ments at 10 ped the para

rvision ) Road

42

with the

e within

Georgia sites in

points of ameters

establfrom tcentraand repermiscentra Table Measu

RustavLeft baVarazMelikisSource The ditraffic. Table Admishouse

Ti7.00 –23.00 Note. due toechelothe co= +10 ProjecThe bend poexistinreadincalculadB forfixed n 4.1.4. ExistiAccordEnviroTbilisi ProjecThe raMeasuThe mpopulavaried

3 Decrestandard

ished for thethe residential streets andeaches 78 ssible level

al road mains

4.3. Backgurement sit

veli Avenue ank of the riviskhevi shvili street e. Institute o

ifference be

4.4 ssible noise es me

– 23.00 – 7.00 The equivao the car aon of soundommon citydB) than th

ct study datbackground oint) and ath

ng backgroungs were meated for ever km 17.8. Tnoise level is

Backgrounng data ding to the

onmental Pro(exposition

ct study datadiation bacurements wemeasuremenated statione between 6

e No. 297/N ods of environm

LoMod

e residentialial houses bd mains of TdB on somfrom 7 pm ts. The highe

round noisete

15 ver Mtkvari

of Environme

tween the d

levels in G

Admissible 54

alent and maand railwayd-protected

y and regionhe value in T

ta noise was mh the propos

und noise weasured in eery noise poThe maximus within the e

nd radiation

data of 20otection andstrength of Ȗ

ta ckground waere made onnts were maery area (stato 8 mR/hr a

f August 16, 2

mental quality”


areas.3 In pby day and Tbilisi excee

me sites of to 11 pm is

est indicator

e in some dN

ental Protect

ata is clear

Georgia for t

average no55 (65*)45 (55*)aximum soy traffic, did residentianal mains aTable 4.4.

measured ased camp sas measurevery 5 minuint. The avem noise levestablished

09 of the Md Natural ReȖ-radiation in

as screened n Decemberade during tarting point oat different p

001 of the Min


particular, thit is 45 dB

eds the admmajor road65 dB and of 78-80 dB

districts of TNoise level,

76768076

tion, 2002

if considerin

the areas in

ise, dB

und levels istanced fro

al houses, hnd railway,

long the moite (km 13)

ed with a detes (total of

erage noise vel was 78 dnorms, but i

Monitoring aesources of Gn the near-g

along the wr 15, 2011 wtraveling by of Ortachalaplace.

nistry of Labor


he maximumat night. It i

missible leved mains and

from 11 pmB is fixed in V

Tbilisi dB

ng that the m

n the immed

Maximum

(dB) for ethom the co

hotels, hostis admitted

ost densely at 13:00 pm

evice “PCE-6 readings)level amoun

dB at km 13s close to th

and ForecasGeorgia, theround atmos

whole selectwith a standa

car all alon 0.00 km). T

r, Health and So


m permissibleis establishel in rush houd streets, w

m to 7 am it Varaziskhevi

In excess n

main source

diate vicinity

m admissible70 (8060 (70

h noise orignstruction tels by 2 md to be 10 d

populated am on DecemEM882”. Fo

) and the avented to 65 d3 and 73 at he limit.

sting Centere backgrounspheric air) w

ted route of ard Russianng the roadThe radiation

ocial Affairs “O


e level is 55 ed that noiseurs (See Ta

while the mis 55 dB al.

of the admnorm, dB

11 11 15 11

of noise in T

y of the res

e noise level0*) 0*) ginating in t

isolating th, directed t

dB more (pr

area (km17.mber 15, 20or half an hoerage indica

dB for km13 km 17.8. Th

r of the Mind radiation lwas 14.4 mR

f the mains n device ɋɊɉ and most

n backgroun

On approving

rvision ) Road

43

dB 2 m e in the

able 4.3) aximum ong the

missible

Tbilisi is

sidential

s, dB

he area he first owards

recision

.8 – the 11. The our, the ator was

and 58 hus, the

nistry of level for R/hr.

section. ɉ 6801. densely d levels

the

Fig. 4 4.1.5. ExistiThe sAgencThe mentranin the major AgencA 10-y- ammthe citand Einto thwater admisAt the of bioloxygefish deconcenormsThe inriver w Table

Water-bearing phase Winter lowwater season Spring flood Summer low-water season Autumn freshet

ProjecThe wKrtsan

.3. Noise-m

Information

ng informaturface wate

cy of the Minmonitoring unce of the cicenter of Tbparameters

cy ensures syear-long ob

monium ionsty center anuropean Une Mtkvari thtreatment psible concensame placeogical oxygen meet Geoevelopment ntration of o

s. ndicators of water regime

4.5. Water pH Ca

w- 7.61 45

7.39 36

8.02 55

7.59 46

ct study datwater samplenisi Park, ne

LoMod

measuring de

n about the

tion about ter quality in nistry of Enviusually takesty, near Zem

bilisi; 3) Gac are examin

seasonal mobservation sh, whose con

nd below thenion for severeatening thlant. Anothentrations fixees, particularen demand orgian and Ewhat is presother nutrie

the water que in different

quality in th

a2+ Mg2+

5.4 12.6

6.0 5.1

5.7 11.9

6.2 11.9

ta of surface of the rivear km 11.00


evice PCE-E

surface wa

the surfaceTbilisi and

ironmental Ps place in tmo Avchalhehiani, along

ned monthly onitoring of mhows that thencentration ae reach) exceral times. The trouble-freer polluting sed by EU onrly at Vakus(BOD-5) are

EU standardsumably caunts - sodium

uality in the phases are

he river MtkIon co

Na+K HCO

7.0 163

10.5 122

26.2 180

17.0 167

ce water quaer Mtkvari w0 of design ro


EM882

atercourses

water qualGeorgia is

Protection. three sectioesi (Avchalathe river Mton these sit

microbial pare river Mtkvaat the three ceeds the mThis is causeee performasubstance foly, but is withti bridge ane fixed. On ts (admissibused by relam nitrites an

river Mtkvagiven in Tab

kvari in Tbilontent, mg/lO3 SO4

2-

3.5 35.6

2.6 23.0

0.0 76.9

7.8 49.9

ality was taken neoad). At this


Fig. 4.4 Dev

s and groun

ity monitored

ns of the ria hydropowekvari lower rtes. In additirameters neaari in Tbilisi points of ob

maximum peed by the unnce of the sr fish, sodiuhin the limitsnd Gachiani the other sidle minimum

atively rapid nd phospho

ari in Tbilisi hble 4.5.

isi hydropo

CL NO3

4.3 3.00

3.3 3.50

8.5 1.50

6.4 _

ear the startsite the roa


vice ɋɊɉ 68

nd pollution

by the Natio

iver Mtkvarier station); 2reach, beyonion, the Natiar Ku lake. is mostly pobservation (armissible sta

ntreated sewewerage sysm nitrite excs of Georgia(2008-09),

de, the conce) and are quflow and hir ions is wi

hydropower

ower station mNO2

0.002 0.

0.019 0.

0.007 _

_ _ 0.

ting site of d passes at


801

onal Environ

: 1) Zahesi2) Vakhushtind the city liional Environ

olluted with nabove the reandards of G

wage watersstem and disceeds the man standardshigh concenentrations ofuite high forgh water levthin the adm

station sect

n section P

mg/l Simg/l

.023 7.00

.001 3.0

_ 4.3

.038 2.9

the design a distance o

rvision ) Road

44

nmental

, at the bridge, mits. 33 nmental

nutrients each, in Georgia flowing scharge aximum

s. ntrations f diluted r normal vel. The missible

tion and

Femg/l

0.04

0.02

0.02

0.01

road (in of 800 –

900m near kthe su Table Desig

InformWithinpollutiowere Entranlead. sampl Table Desig

#

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

from the rivkm13 of the rface water

4.6. n studies d

mation aboun the limits oon could betaken near nce (km 17.The report e analysis is

4.7

n studies d

Descr

Turbulence

pH

Diluted oxyHydrocarbmg/l

TDS, mg/l Total nitrogmg/l Total phosmg/l

Chlorides,

Oil produc

LoMod

ver. Besidesroad The repsamples is g

data on the

ut the grounof Tbilisi and e obtained. the propose8). Analysisof the Envi

s given in An

data on the

ription

e, NTU

ygen, mg/l bonates,

gen, N,

sphate,

mg/l

ts, mg/l


s, the sampport of the Egiven in Ann

pollution of

nd pollutionparticularlyTherefore, wed Camp s

s to assess ronmental P

nnex 3. Belo

pollution of

MaximumAdmissiblConcentra

ion

6.5-8.54 – 6

350

0.3


les were takEnvironmentanex 3. Below

f soil with h

n , near the dewe rely on ite (km 13,5the pollution

Protection Aow, we give a

f soil with h

m le at

Surface

at tentran

Rust

N 41035

EO 44056’30

1.4

8.1

8.0

222

778

2.8

0.3

159

0.0


ken from a al Protection

w, we give a

heavy metal

esign site, nthe project 5 of the den was made

Agency showa brief summ

heavy metal

e water

the nce to tavi

g

5’55,3’’

0,4’’

N

EO44

49

23

07

2.0

8.0

04

87

9.7

63


little streamn Agency shbrief summa

ls

no informatiostudy data sign road) e on heavy wing the resmary.

ls.

From the gully along the route

41036’17,0’’

O 056’15,7’’

1.21

8.141

8.02

192.8

1491.0

7.858

0.859

77.9

0.042


flowing in aowing the re

ary.

on about theonly. The sand at the metals, par

sults of the

Mtkva(km1

KrtsanPark

’ N 41037’

EO 44056’24

1.58

8.60

8.45

173.

274.

2.47

0.13

19.3

0.01

rvision ) Road

45

a gorge esults of

e ground samples Rustavi

rticularly ground

ari 1;

nisi k)

09,5’’

,0’’8

3

5

2

0

9

5

7

2

Table Tentachem

No Po

N

C

Zi

Le

4.1.6. Tbilisi capita

4.8 tive Allowical propert

ollutant

ickel

opper

inc

ead

Topograph

is located l of the cou

#

1 Lea

2 Zinc

3 Cob

4 Cop

5 Nick

LoMod

able Conceties (total co

Soil Type

a) sandy a b) acid soilPHKCI<5,5 c) neutral a(clay and loPHKCI<5,5a) sandy a b) acid soilPHKCI<5,5 c) neutral a(clay and loa) sandy ab) acid soilPHKCI<5,5c) neutral (clay and loa) sandy ab) acid soilPHKCI<5,5c) neutral (clay and lo

hy and relief

in South Cantry is situa

Descript

d, Pb, mkg/

c, Zn, mkg/g

balt, Co,mkg

pper, Cu,mkg

kel, Ni, mkg/


entration (Tontent mg/k

nd sandston

ls (clay and 5.

and close to oam) 5.5,5. nd sandston

ls (clay and 5.

and close to oam) PHKCnd sandstonls (clay and 5. and close tooam) PHKCnd sandstonls (clay and 5. and close tooam) PHKC

f

aucasus at ated on the

tion

/g

/g

g/g

/g


TAC) of Heakg)

Tctb

ne

loam)

neutral

2

4

8

ne

loam)

neutral I>(5,5.

1

3

6

ne loam)

o neutral I>(5,5

51

2

ne loam)

o neutral I>(5,5

3

6

1

41043' Nortboth banks

Rustavi (13,

N 4103

EO 4405

42

91

12

98

19


avy Metals

TAC considering the background 20

40

80

132

33

66

55 110

220

32

65

130

th latitude aof the river

highway 5km)

35’54,3’’

56’30,4’’

2.33

1.6

2.69

8.6

9.7


in Soils of

Aggregatethe Polluta

Solid: as the cominerals

Solid: asorganic-mcompoundcompositi



and 44047' EMtkvari, at

Entry to(17,

N 4

EO 4


Various Ph

e conditionant in Soil

salts, sorbedomposition

s salts, sormineral ds, in on of minera



East longitud380-770 m

o Rustavi 7km)

1033’50,2’’

44057’52,3’’

18.2

65.5

12.5

90.9

22.7

rvision ) Road

46

hysical-

n of

d, in of

rbed

the als

rbed

the als

rbed

the als

de. The altitude

abovesides. south-city is

Fig. 4 The rivand pAvchaof Triaobstacgeogracity ducity is 600 m The reThe rephenogravitadamag

e sea level. Tbilisi is bo

-east and bystretched al

.5 Topograp

ver divides opulation. T

ala district toaleti Ridge cles for the aphic enviroue to their clocated at 3

m above sea

elief of Tbiliselief had beeomena, the ational phenging the city

LoMod

It has an amordered by Sy the branchlong 33 km a

phic map of

the capital iThe portion o the river Lo

descendingcity to ext

onment, thercomplex top350 m abovelevel.

si is compleen subject to

landslidesnomena areinfrastructu


mphitheatre Saguramo Rhes of Trialealong the riv

f Tbilisi

into two. Thof the city oochini, and tg as escarptend on there are highlyographic re

e sea level a

ex and its dio a strong tr, mudflowse the main re.


shape and Ridge from theti Ridge frover Mtkvari a

e left part oon the left bthe relief of ps towards right banky densely polief, are not

and the settle

iversity is thransformatios, erosion

factors ha


is borderedhe north, byom the southand covers th

of Tbilisi excbank of the its right banthe Mtkvar

k of the riveopulated sec

developed.ed areas of

he result of on for centurand floods

ampering th


d with mouny Iori Plateauh and west he area of 37

ceeds its righriver Mtkvak is presenti gorge. Th

er are mounctions, while The south-Mtatsminda

its geomorpries. Out of s are active developm


ntains from iu from the e(See Fig. 4.72 km2.

ht part with ri is stretcheted by the brherefore, thentains. Withe other area-eastern parare located

phological stthe natural-

ve. Landslidment of Tbi

rvision ) Road

47

ts three east and .5). The

its area ed from ranches e major in such s of the rt of the at 550-

tructure. tectonic de and lisi and

Fig. 4 There the Lrepresextremgraduaalluviasubsidwith itsthe mcrest cwith itsof the KvemopresenterritorterraceIalguja(Tsivis 4.1.7G The srespecAbychthe geexplorKuznefoundaaccomN. Skothers

.6 Topograp

are two zonLesser Caucsented as Tme northern-ally reduces

al plain of thdence of thes northern sorphologicacoincides wis absolute hridge in rela

o Kartli vallnted as Asury is presentes). The sua ridge. On skhevi, Satir

Geological c History o

study area, ct. The first g

h (1869, 188eological barers. The seetsov (1937)ation to th

mplished in thhirtladze (1

s.

LoMod

phy

nes of modecasioni and

Teleti ridge, -eastern pars eastwards he river Mtk

e paleogenicslope inclinedl form and th Teleti ant

heights varyiation to the r

ey covers aureti-Tsalaskted by the te

urface of theits part, th

matsaskhev

conditions oof geologica

if comparedgeological st

87, 1902) ansis of the scond stage ), N. Vasoee extensiohe 1950-70s958), N. As


ern relief ided Kvemo Kwhich is thert of the stuand over th

kvari. The sc stratum in d more (20-tectonic struticline. The cing from 440iver Mtkvari

a significant kuri plain anerrace surface plain is ine surface o

vi), flowing a

of the studyal studies

d to other rtudies here

nd E. Furnie tudy area wof studies s

evitch (1932n of the gs by D. Buleslamazova (


entified withiKartli Plain.e south-easdy area (a s

he settlemensubsidence the same d45º) than itsucture is obcrest section0 m to 606 mvaries betw

section witnd is locateces of the rivnclined southof the plain cross the vil

y area

regions of Gwere accom(1896) and

what largely tarted in the

2, 1937), A.geological ishvili (1960(1953), D. P


n the limits The form

stern end of small part o

nt adjacent tof the ridge

direction. Thes southern sbserved oven of the ridgm. The relateen 80-200

thin the limied between ver Mtkvari (h-east (up tis slightly clages Sogan

Georgia, is mplished at th

others. Thefacilitated f

e 1930s hea Janelidze net. The m

0), I. BuachidPapava (197


of the studymer morphof Trialeti Ridof it). The heto Soganluge in the eae ridge is as

slope (15-20ºer Teleti ridge is charactive height ofm.

its of the stTeleti and

(the I and II rto 10º), towcomplicatednlugi and Kr

better studhe end of the mentionedfurther geoloaded by V. R

(1930), whomost impordze (1949), 71), E. Dev


y area, in palogical elem

dge and coveight of Telei it merges wst results frsymmetric inº). A coincid

ge. In particterized by hif the norther

tudy area, wIalguja ridgeright over-flo

wards the bo with small

rtsanisi.

ied in a gee XIX centu authors dev

ogical worksRengaten (19ose works rtant studieI. Kakhadze

vdariani (197

rvision ) Road

48

articular, ment is vers the eti ridge with the rom the n shape dence of cular, its lly relief rn slope

which is es. The oodplain ottom of

gorges

eological ry by G. veloped

s by the 937), S. laid the s were (1947), 71) and

The fBuach1980).the stuaccomlimits accomAstrakthe rel The g Accordin the geologperiod The dnorth-wof TelecharacThe dLitholoupper is mainterla150 to The Owhich thickne The Lpresenand thKotsakOligocwith cThe toby nonKotsakbrokenhorizo The dediffereover-flgenespresenfiller (reacheDeluvipresenTheir tthe stu

first significahidze (1949). The most iudy area in

mplished withof the rive

mplished by khov (1971) lief and morp

eology and

ding to the t southern agy of the areds.

deposits of vwestern pareti anticline cterized by f

deposits of togically, the Tbilisi stratu

ainly represayers. The too 260 m.

Oligocene (Kare mostly

esses of Kh

Lower Miocented by two he upper strakhuri horizocene age. Tclay and micotal strengthn-carbonate khuri Age din sandstone

on is 600 m.

eposits descent thicknessloodplain ter

sis. The depnted by mar15-20%). Tes 10-15 m. ial-proluvial nted by claythicknessesudy area is

LoMod

ant hydroge), continuedimportant stparticular w

h the scale er Mtkvari g

different abeing the mphological c

d tectonics o

tectonic zonand Bolnisi ea is particip

volcanogenit of the studand they ar

facial modificthe Upper EUpper Eoce

um with numsented by otal thicknes

Khadum hory representadum horizo

ene depositslithological s

atum, whichon. SakarauThe horizon cro-conglom of the horizthin-layer d

sintegrate ines and sand

cribed aboveses almost erraces of theposits of allurly, well-treahe thicknes deposits in

y ground (c, if considerthe eastern


eological std by the stuudies in the

were accompof 1:25 000gorge. The uthors, with

most importanonditions of

of the study

ing of Georgsub-zones

pated by the

ic-depositoryy area. The re representcations, whicEocene are ene is dividemmulites. Onmarls, argi

ss of Navtlu

rizon) deposted by clayon clays reac

s, which arstrata: the lo is almost toulo depositsis structureerates interl

zon reaches dark clays, wnto thin browinterlayers

e over the severywhere,e river Mtkvauvial genes

ated shingle ss of the me

the study lay and loam

red visually, n end of Be


udies in thudies of L. engineering

plished by A0 from Tbilis

geomorphoh the worksnt though. Inthe area in

y area

gia (E. Gamof the folderocks from

y formation area of spreted by layerch are strongspread in

ed into two snly the formellite-like claghi stratum

sits are spreys with gych 50-70 m.

re spread inower sandstotally structus almost h

ed with stronlayers. The 600 m. The

which reach wn slates duspread in th

study area a which on thari of alluviais in the stuwith the ad

entioned de

area are mm) with the vary betwee

edena-Teleti


he study arKharatishvi

g-geological A. Tsagurishvi to the stateological stus by L. Man fact, thesedetails.

mkrelidze, 20ed system othe Middle E

of the Middeading of thered tufas angly dislocatethe north-wstrata: the loer stratum isays with sain the envir

ead in the cpsum and

n the southetone stratumured with Maorizontally ng sandstonsandstones

e deposits of600 m whenring weathe

he given clay

re covered wheir turn areal genesis anudy area ar

dmixture of beposits withi

mostly spreaadmixtures

en 3 and 5 manticline, w


rea were ali in subseqrespect, co

vili (1981). Te border of dies in the

aruashvili, D authors suc

000), the stuof the LesseEocene thro

dle Eocene ese depositsd tufa-brecc

ed. western part ower Navtlugs spread oveandstone arons of Tele

central part rarely with

ern part of m belongs to aykop habitulie over th

nes with quas are of a tyf Kotsakhurin weathered

ering. At somys. The aver

with the Quae presented nd deposits re spread mboulders (5%n the limits

d in its nors of detritus m. The grea

which on its


accomplishedquent years

overing the wThese studieGeorgia, wi

e study areD. Tsereteli cceeded in s

udy area is ier Caucasiough the Qua

are spreads coincides wcias. The str

of the studghi stratum er the study and tufa-saneti ridge vari

of the studh sandstone

the study aSakaraulo h

us clays, bele deposits artz-arkose ypical whitis Age are pre

d. The dark me places, thrage strengt

aternary depby the I andof deluvial-p

most of all a%) and sands of the stud

rthern part aand grit (2

atest tectonicpart is divid

rvision ) Road

49

d by I. s (1970, whole of es were ithin the

ea were and N.

studying

ncluded oni. The aternary

d in the with that ratum is

dy area. and the area. It

ndstone es from

dy area, es. The

area, is horizon, longs to

of the content

sh color. esented clays of

here are th of the

posits of d II right proluvial and are d-gravel dy area

and are 0-25%). c unit in ded into

Teleti Tsalas

Fi

and Taborskuri synclin

ig. 4.7Geolo

LoMod

ri anticlineses.

ogical Map


. On their

of Project A


part, these

Area


anticlines


are divided


d by Krtsan

rvision ) Road

50

nisi and

Fig. 4.8Geologica

LoMod

al Map of Pr


roject Area





rvision ) Road

51

Seism The stpart isrisk abelongof GeoresistiSoganstatistenginehave existin

Fig. Note: A 6-7-1920 aquakewaveslateraleasterBelow(dimen

1. 2. 3.

micity

tudy area is s complicaterea of seismgs to point 8orgia of Octong construc

nlugi and Rical data, heering strucoccurred m

ng statistical

4.9. Seismacceleratio

-point earthqand 2002. A

es varies bets mostly dep) of spreadrn.

w we give tnsionless co

0.17 m/sec0.12 m/sec0.174 m/se

LoMod

located withd by tectonimicity. Acco

8 seismic zonober 7, 2009ction” (PN 0Rustavi, facehigh-magnitutures (includore than ondata.

mic Hazard Mons are give

quake in TbilAccording totween 2.1 anpend on the ding of the

the characteoefficient of sc2 in Tbilisi c2 in Rustaviec2 in village


hin the limitsc faults crosording to thne (Decree N9, Tbilisi “On1.01-09)). T

e the dangeude earthquding the roance historica

Map indicaten in “g” un

lisi took placo the earthqund 3.6 seconlocation of tseismic wa

eristics of mseismicity) fo

i e Soganlugi.


s of Aspindzssing one anhe macro-seNo. 1-1/2284

n approving bThe settled aer of point akes capab

ad) and impally as well

ting maximanits.

ce in the yeauakes occurnds. The natectonic faultaves in the

maximum hor the settled


a-Tbilisi monother. The zeismic zonin4 of the Minbuilding stanareas in the8 earthquakble of signifpacting the m

as in the n

al horizonta

ars of 1283, rred during t

ature and dirt structures. study area

orizontal acd areas with


rphostructurzone is loca

ng of Georgister of Econndards and re study areakes. Accordficantly dammorpho-dynnear past. B

al accelerat

1318, 1803the XX centection of spThe dominais northern

ccelerations in the limits


ral unit, whicated within thgia, the studnomic Develrules - “Eartha, which areding to the maging the

amics of thBelow, we g

tion and inte

, 1827, 1859tury, the durreading the ating direction-western-so

of seismicof the study

rvision ) Road

52

ch on its he high-dy area lopment hquake-e Tbilisi, existing modern e relief, give the

ensity

9, 1909, ration of seismic

on (sub-outhern-

c waves y area:

Hidrog AccordlocateArtesiapressu Two pthe wawater-proof argilitewater thermacontentypes: 1. chemi0.25-0Their t 2. calciumcalciumshouldcharacmetha The dcharaccarbonabovegorgeslittle (ohave awith thare sugeneraOut ofQuatearea. Tchemigenera Duringthe roa 4.1.8 (kilom

geology

ding to the hd in the regian basin of ure system o

principal hydater-bearing -bearing horlaguna-maries. Out of th

outcrops aal waters ofnt, the unde

Thermal ccal content,

0.34 gr/l andtemperature

Cold waterm-magnesium-sodium, wd be noted cterized by

ane of up to

deposits ofcterized bynates, are in

e the local ers), where thone-hundreda greater flowheir mineraliulfate, sulfatal mineralizaf the rocks

ernary deposThe water ocal content, al mineraliza

g the road coad corridor i

Assessmemeters)

LoMod

hydrogeologion of porouGeorgia and

of water-pres

drogeologicahorizon of m

rizon of the mne and volche volcanogt the bottomf deep circuerground wa

uring waters these wated sulfate-ch

es vary from

r outcrops, wum, with thewith the minthat the unhigh conten19.26-22% a

f Oligoceney low collen fact waterrosion sectioey cross wadth of litre pw (up to 0.3 ization mostte-hydrocarbation of 3.2-6(alluvial, de

sits, the highutcrops assothe waters a

ation varies f

onstruction as expected.

ent of the De


gical zoning s and fissured in the regssure system

al complexesmain rocks amain rocks iscanogenic degenic rocks m of the goulation in theaters associ

s with their ers are chlorhloride-sodiu26 to 50ºC.

which are ase mineralizatneralization derground w

nt of hydrocand nitrogen

e-Lower Mector propeproof. The u

on level and ater-bearing per second)m/sec). The

tly dependinbonate, sulfa6.6 gr/l. Theyluvial, proluv

h terraces ofociated withare sulfate-hfrom 1.0 to 1

and operatio

esign Corri


of Georgia e waters of ion of fissurm of Adjara-

s may be idand the wates presented eposits: tufaof the Midd

orge edges e rocks of thated with th

outcrops asride-hydrocaum-calcium,

ssociated wittion of 1.4 gof 0.6 gr/l. Twaters of dcarbon of upn.

iocene - certies. Evenundergroundlocally outclayers of m, and the se undergroung on the coate-chloride y are characvial) of the f the river Mt the given dhydrocarbon1.0 gr/l.

on in fact no

dor Engine


(Buachidze Marneuli-Gare and fissurTrialeti folde

entified wither-bearing ho

by Eocene, as, tufa-brecdle Eocene, as seepage

he same aghe Middle E

ssociated wiarbonate-sod

with the m

th volcanogegr/l to 2.6 gThe tempereep circulatp to 12 mg

clays, sandn some sad waters in trop over theinor thicknesprings assond waters arontent of gy

and sodiumcterized by hwater-bearintkvari are meposits are

nate and calc

o pollution of

ering-Geolo


I. (1979)), tardabani artere-karst wated zone.

hin the limitsorizon of QuOligocene a

ccias, clays, there are r

e waters. Age. AccordinEocene rock

ith tufogenicdium, with th

mineralization

enic rocks, ar/l and sulfaature variestion of the /l. These w

dstones, mandstone sthese depos

e edges of wsses. The flociated with re of differenpsum in them-calcium-mhigh value ofng complex ostly water-mostly of a cium-sodium

f the underg

ogical Cond


the study teresian basin ters of Tbilis

s of the studaternary rocand Miocenesandstones

rare fresh aAn exceptionng to their cks, are of tw

c waters. Whe mineralizn of 0.68-0.

are hydrocarate-hydrocars from 6 to Middle Eoce

waters often

marls, argilitspecies, cosits mostly c

watercoursesow of the spfissure sand

nt chemical ce rocks. Themagnesium wf hardness (structured w

infused in thlittle flow. W

m-magnesium

ground water

ditions by p

rvision ) Road

53

rritory is of block

si water-

dy area: cks. The e water-s, marls, and cold n is the chemical wo main

With their zation of .87 gr/l.

rbonate-rbonate-18ºC. It ene are contain

tes are ntaining circulate s (rivers, prings is dstones content,

e waters with the pH=7). with the he study

With their m. Their

rs along

pickets

Averastudy BelowstructuThe deinternathe moThe dangle (Rc) isThe d>17, ifrictionmodulThe deof inte50, theThe deof intethe moThe dconsisthe addeformShinglgroundangle 6 kgforc

The cproper

Genercorrid The sfloodpendingof alluwith loterritorto the (simpl The rostudy (See FsurfacI and branchpipelinconstrgenesof diffe

aged physic area

w we give thuring the stuensity of tufal friction is 3odulus of deensity of saof internal f

s 100, the mensity of clandex of co

n is 20º, the us of deformensity of ma

ernal friction e modulus oensity of arg

ernal friction odulus of deensity of loa

stency indexdherence ismation is 190le with boud is 1.95 gr/of internal frce/cm2, the m

constituent grties and in f

ral descriptdor with the

section of Kplain terrace g is used as vial genesis

oams of differy and no orcomplexity

e) category.

oad construcarea), runs

Fig. 4). Mostce is in fact fII terrace suh pipe. Thene and Souruction and sis with the aerent thickne

LoMod

cal-mechan

he Averageudy area. as is 1.1 gr/37º, the adh

eformation isndstones is friction is 29odulus of deays is 1.95 nsistency isadherence i

mation is 240arls is 2.30 g

is 31º, the of deformatiogilites is 2.0 gis 19º, the a

eformation isams is 1.75

x is 0.0-0.25,s 0.25, the 0, and the mlder admixt/cm3, the poriction is 35ºmodulus of d

grounds of tfact no comp

tion of the e indication

KP 04km+60surface of tagricultural

s with the aderent thicknerigination orof the engi

ction corridowithin the bt of the territflat (slightly iurfaces, there road alonguth Caucasuoperation. T

admixtures oesses. No h


ical (geotec

ed physical-m

/cm3, their pherence is 17s 2, and the m

2.30 gr/cm3

9º, the adheeformation isgr/cm3, their

s 0.0-0.25, tis 0.60, the p0, and the mgr/cm3, their adherence i

on is 2, and tgr/cm3, their

adherence iss 2, and the m gr/cm3, the, the filtrationprovisional

modulus of elures (5%) a

orosity coeffº, the adheredeformation

the road coplications in

engineeringof piquets

00m-KP 13khe river Mtkplots of field

dmixtures ofesses. No hr activation oneering-geo

r along the sborders of thtory is cultivanclined towae runs a gulg the givenus pipeline. The geologyof boulder anazardous ge


chnical) pro

mechanical

orosity is 7%70, the tempmodulus of e3, their poroerence is 9,s 4, and the r coefficient the filtrationprovisional e

modulus of elporosity is 3

is 40, the tethe modulusr porosity is s 3, the tempmodulus of eeir porosity in coefficient

estimate rlasticity is 34and sand-aficient is 0.6ence is 0.07is 480, and t

orridor are mthis respect

g-geological(kilometers

km+00m runkvari. Most od. The geolof boulder andhazardous geof such procological cond

section of Khe II over-floated as arabards the rivelly (See Fig.

n section is These will

y of the ternd sand-andeological pro


operties of

(geotechnic

%, their softeporal resistanelasticity is 4sity is 8%, t the tempormodulus of of porosity

n coefficient estimate resasticity is 3931%, their s

emporal resiss of elasticity32%, their s

poral resistanelasticity is 4is 05%, the t is 0.05, theresistance is40. nd-gravel fi0, the filtrati, the provisiothe modulus

mostly charat are expecte

l conditionss)

ns within thof the territorogy of the ted sand-and-eological pro

cesses is exditions, the

P 13km +00odplain terrable and sower Mtkvari). A. 5), which c

also crossl be taken rritory is pard-gravel fillerocesses are


the ground

cal) properti

ening ratio isnce uniaxial 4. their softeninral resistancelasticity is is 0.70%, t<0,001, th

istance (Rc)90. oftening ratistance uniaxy is 5. softening ratnce uniaxial 4. number of

e angle of ints 2 kg/cm2

ller. The deion coefficieonal estimat

s of elasticity

acterized byed during the

s of the road

e borders ory is populaterritory is par-gravel filler,ocesses are

xpected in thgiven territo

0m-KP 17kmace surface

wing land (moAlong the cocrosses the rsed by Baku

into accounrticipated byr, which are fixed on the


ds structur

ies of the g

s 0.86, the astrength (R

ng ratio is 0ce uniaxial s10. heir plasticite angle of ) is 5 kgforce/c

io is 0.81, thxial strength

io is 0.30, thstrength (Rc

plasticity is ternal friction, the mod

ensity of thent is 50 m/dte resistancey is 3800.

y favorable e road opera

d construct

of the I righed, and a participated by , which are ce fixed on thhe future. Acory belongs

m+800m (enof the river

ostly pastureontact surfacroad by meau-Tbilisi-Ceynt during thy shingle of covered wit

e given territ

rvision ) Road

54

ring the

grounds

angle of c) is 70,

.77, the strength

ty index internal

cm2, the

he angle h (Rc) is

he angle c) is 10,

10, the n is 21º, dulus of

e given day, the e (R0) is

bearing ation.

tion

ht over-art of its shingle covered

he given ccording to the I

nd of the Mtkvari

es). The ce of the ans of a yhan oil he road

alluvial h loams tory and

no oricomplcatego

The reroad ageolog(simpldifferethe prgeologspecif The I surfacby no or by onto t

igination or exity of the ory.

eport is attacand adjacengical hazarde), II (avera

ent factors, iremises andgical procesic grounds a

(simple) catce being hor

more than trocky rockshe surface.

LoMod

activation engineering

ched by a snt territoriess), with three

age) and III n particular, communicases and the

and their imp

tegory unitesizontal and two lithologi, which be mAs for the u


of such prog-geological

schematic ms according e categories(complex) c by geomorations to theeir possible ipact on comm

s the territornot dissectiocal layers wmay coveredunderground


ocesses is conditions,

Fig. 4.10

Fig. 4.11

ap of zoningto the eng

s identified acategories. Trphologic cone geologicalimpact on pmunications

ry located woned. In a gwith their locd with non-rd waters, th


expected inthe given te

g of the congineering-geaccording to The areas anditions; geo environmenremises and

s, etc.

within one geeological res

cation being rocky rocks ey are eithe


n the futureerritory belon

nstruction coological conthe given si

are categoriological connt; hydrogeod communic

eomorphologspect, the tehorizontal (of a little st

er absent, o


e. Accordingngs to the I (

orridor of thenditions (degn: sectionszed by consditions – relologycal concations; pres

gic element, erritory is preor slightly inrength, outcr presented

rvision ) Road

55

g to the (simple)

e design egree of s of the I sidering lation of nditions; sence of

with its esented nclined), cropping

by one

sharplgeolog The II geomodisseclithologdeposdiffereground The IIgeomogeologstrengcovereSome geologoriginaand exthe de Concl As a cin resconditcompland ronecesbe dev

y expressedgical process

(average) corphologic ectioned. In gical layers

sits. The undent chemicalds, they do n

I (complex) orphologic egical respecgths sharply ed with non-areas are s

gical procesation and acxistence of

esigning and

lusion

conclusion, wpect of geoions. Howeications are

ock avalanchsarily considveloped (arr

LoMod

d horizon ases or speci

category incelements oa geologica. The rockyderground w compositionot play an i

category incelements of ct, the territo

varying. Th-rocky rocksstructured wsses are widctivation of specific gro building of

we may sayological hazaever, along expected dhes and no-dered underanging the w


and having afic grounds

cludes the teof a similar al respect, ty rocks havwaters are pn. Hazardoumportant ro

cludes the tedifferent ge

ories are prehe rocky rocs. The horizoith alternatin

dely spread,hazardous

unds are of new commu

y that in the ards, is in fag the secduring the ro-large-scale r the projectwalls, regula


a homogen(settling, sw

erritories, whr genesis, wthe territorie

ve uneven spresented bus geologicale in making

erritories, wenesis, with esented by mcks are veryons of the unng water-bea or the terrigeological a decisive

unications an

final accounact charactection of Koad construclandslide pr and as a re

ating the surf


ous chemicwelling, etc.)

hich are sprwith their ses are pressurfaces any two or mo

al processesg a design de

hich are sprtheir surfac

more than foy much weanderground aring and waitory is poteprocesses. importance

nd in the exp

nt, the studyerized by faKP 00km+6ction and oprocesses. Tesult, the reface waters,


cal compositare found he

read within tsurfaces slisented by nd are coveore formed

s are limitedecision.

read within tces stronglyour lithologicathered and waters are ater-resistanntially dangThe mentiowhen makin

ploitation pha

y section of Tavorable eng600m-KP04kperation, in he given cirlevant prote etc.).


tion. No hazere.

the limits of ightly inclinno more thred with nohorizons an. As for the

the limits of y dissectionecal layers wfissured. T

not sharply nt rocks. Hazerous in res

oned circumng decisionsase.

Tbilisi-Rustagineering-gekm+600m, particular ro

rcumstancesective measu

rvision ) Road

56

zardous

several ed and an four

on-rocky nd have specific

several ed. In a

with their hey are distinct. zardous spect of stances s during

avi road, eological

certain ock falls s will be ures will

Fig. 4

.12Geotech

LoMod

hnical Map o


of Complex


xity of the G


eoengineer


ring Condit


ions

rvision ) Road

57

Fig. 4.13 Geotech

LoMod

hnical Map


of Complex


xity of the G


Geoenginee


ering Condit


tions

rvision ) Road

58

4.1.9W

4.1.9.1 The bthe biglevel othe ter The lethe rivthis se The bathe telowlanThe gThe gand Edepos The vea widewith do The rivspringwater The flfloods The flolevel in Low ware ins Along with its The ripurposof TbilRustavGardaecono 4.1.9.2

The n7+000while gslopesKura fdisappinto thchann

Water Resou

1 The river

ed of the rivggest river inon the northrritory of Aze

ength of the ver across thection is mad

asin of the rrritory of Ge

nd. The loweeology of theology of th

Eocene claysits. There ar

egetation coe band of sominating ha

ver is fed wi floods causperiods. Thow in summ coincide wood of April n Tbilisi exce

water levels stable. The a

the rehabilits banks prot

ver Mtkvari ses. The clolisi and in Zavi supplies t

abani thermaomic value bu

2 Brief Hyd

ameless go0) start fromgorges crosss of Iaghluji from the rigpear within the “water hel does not

LoMod

urces

Mtkvari

ver Mtkvari rn South Cauern slope of

erbaijan.

river is 1364he territory ode up of 122

river Mtkvari eorgia, Somest part of thehe upper parhe piedmontys. The geore brown and

over of the bubalpine veardwood spe

th glaciers, ssed by sease most wate

mer is 22-27with freshets

18 of 1968 eeded 5-6 m

and discharaverage num

tation road stected with c

is widely uosest HPP pahesi (betwethe irrigational power planut mostly a l

drographic

orges crossinm the northe

sing the folloridge withinht side, whithe terrain uousehold” irfunction at p


runs all alonucaus, headf Kizil-Gyadi

4 km and thof Georgia is211 rivers wi

has an asymkhit-Javakh

e basin is thrt of the rivet is presenteology of Kad black soils

asin above getation belecies. Kartli

snow, rain asonal snow er-bearing p7% and exc

caused by is a classic

m above the

rges are momber of icy d

section, the rconcrete dike

used for irrigplants are loeen Tbilisi an and powernt. r. Mtkvareisure mean

Characteriz

ng the first rn slopes ofowing section the same ale some of until crossingrrigation chapresent.


ng Tbilisi-Rus from the sik mount in

e area of itss 350 km. Tth the total l

mmetrical sheti high mo

he intermontaer basin is ped by Paleozartli valley iss spread alo

2500 m altitlow. There Plain is mos

and ground wmelting and

period is spreeds that inrains and le example ofnormal leve

ostly fixed indays is 8-14

river Mtkvaries (KP 0+00

gation, poweocated upstrand Mtskhetar engineeringi is not usedning.

zation of Go

section of Tf Teleti ridg

ons (from KPaltitudes. Ththe gorges g the rehabannel runnin


ustavi rehabisprings at thTurkey and

s catch basinhe hydrograength of 354

hape and countainous zane lowland

presented byzoic, Jurasss presentedng the river

ude is preseis a mixed fstly cultivate

waters. Its wd summer aring with 47-n autumn oreads to cataf such a cata

el.

n winter. In ton average.

i flows throu00 to KP 2+2

er engineeriream from pa).The headg water to Gd for navigat

orges Cross

Tbilisi-Rustave between

P 7+000 till Khe majority ospread on t

bilitation roadng parallel t


ilitation roade altitude offlows into t

n is 188.000aphic networ465 km.

overs Main Cone and int, which is Ka

y the rocks osic and Cretad by Old aacross the p

ented by alpforest growi

ed with agricu

water regimend winter re-58% of ther winter. In sastrophicallyastrophe, w

this period, .

gh a single, 200).

ng and induroject sites works arran

Gardabani irrion. Fishing

sing Tbilisi

vi road (fromthe altitudes

KP 17+800) of the mentithe right terrd. Part of thto the reha


d. The river f 2720 m abohe Caspian

0 km2. The lerk of the rive

Caucasioni rtermontane artli Plain. of a volcanicaceous sandnd Modern plain.

pine vegetating in the piultural crops

is characteelatively stab annual watsome yearsy high waterhen the pea

the icy phen

non-branch

ustrial waterin Ortachala

nged past therigation systin r. Mtkvar

-Rustavi Ro

m KP 0+500s of 785 to – from the nioned gorgerace of r. Khe small gorbilitation roa

rvision ) Road

59

Mtkvari, ove sea Sea on

ength of er along

ridge on tectonic

c origin. dstones alluvial

on, with iedmont s.

rized by ble low-ter flow.

s, spring r levels. ak water

nomena

hed bed,

r-supply a district e city of tem and i has no

oad

0 till KP 525 m,

northern es join r. ura and rges fall ad. The

The gewhich shrubbridge aafter c The gintenscause GorgeHenceare ideDischaAccordgorgescalcula

Where

case is

Duringcatchmto the

F kK

The vdischatopogryears,

eology of thare covere

bery and graare utilized

crossing Tbil

orges are dive rain andd by rain sig

es crossing re, the valuesentified usinarge of Riveding to the s, the areaated with the

e R – it is theF – the areK – climate

s 5; W- recurreni - leveled section for3 - rate ofmap and reO - rate of

G - rate of

g the calculament basin oareas of the

km2 K I

values of marge of the raphic map 50 years an

LoMod

e dry nameled with loamasses are pthrough indisi-Rustavi r

dry the mostd melting ofgnificantly ex

rehabilitations of maximag the methors in Conditimentioned

a of the wae below form

RQ

e rayon paraea of the wate rate of the

nce in yearsinclination o

r calculation f characterisespective taf the basin fo

Whf basin form

Where

sasB - av

relation

ation of the of which is lee water catch

<1 0.70

morphometricgorges croas well as t

nd 10 years.


less gorge bmy soils. Gresent from ustrial areasroad.

t part of the f the thin snxceed the sa

n Tbilisi-Rusl water disch

od given in thions of Cauc

method, thater catchmemula:

�«¬

ª

��

�,13/2

LKF

ameter. Its vter catchmerayon, the v

s; of the river flin km;

stic of soil coable; orestation, th

O

here tF - the, the value o

G

maxB - the ma

verage width

LFBsas .

maximal diess than 5 khment basin

1 0.80

c elements ossing the rthe values o. The values


basins is comGorge basins

vegetation s and agricu

year. Watenow cover. ame values c

stavi road haharges of thhe “Technicacasus.” he values oent basin o

�W

��

44,0

1,038,035,

10i

alue in Eastnt basin in cvalue of whic

ow or gorge

over in the riv

he value of w

F��

2,01

1O

e area of foreof which is ca

25,0 max ��sasB

B

aximal width

h of the basi

scharge of km2, the belons are introdu

2 0.83

required foehabilitationof the maxims are given in


mposed of ts are stripphere. The bultural crops

er flows in thDischarges caused by s

ave not beenese gorges al Instruction

of maximal of which do

GO ��3�»¼

º125

ern Georgiacross-sectionch is taken f

e in units from

ver basin. Its

which is calc

FFt

ested basin ialculated as

75,0�

h of the basin

in in km, the

those smallow specially uced in the a

3 0.87

or the calcn road are mal water dn the below T


he Quaternaped of foresbeds of the gs on the righ

he gorges oand levels

now melting

n studied in crossing the

n for Calcula

discharge ooes not exc

G m3/sec

a is deemed n for calculatrom special

m the startin

s value is ta

culated as fo

in %; follows:

n in km;

e value of wh

gorges, theprocessed rabove formu

40.9

ulation of tidentified usischarge forTable #1.


ary period dst cover. Ogorges from ht terrace of

only in the pof the flash

g.

hydrologicae rehabilitatiation of the M

of those riveceed 400 k

as 1.15; tion in km2;map and in

g point till cr

ken from a s

ollows:

hich is calcu

e area of thrates correspula: 4 93 1

the maximasing 1:2500r recurrence

rvision ) Road

60

eposits, nly thin Iaghluji

f r. Kura

eriod of h floods

al terms. on road

Maximal

ers and m2, are

our

ross-

special

lated by

e water ponding

5 1.00

al water 00 scale e of 100

Morp

Gorge name

1111

Gorgeaccord

Fig 4. In addhave determKura observhydrol(1968)In Thecross-2.01.1of distThe avVariatAsymmtheoreAssesdeterm

phometric El

# or F km2

5 32.2 6 4.50 7 1.53 8 1.88

es crossing Tding to the n

14 Gorges c

dition to the also been

mination of t– hydrologivations (192ogical point). e variation ro-section for 4-83 using ribution havverage pereion rate Cv=metrical ratetical point cssment parammined – rela

LoMod

ements and

L km k

14.6 04.00 03.00 02.20 0

Tbilisi-Rustanumbering gi

crossing th

gorges croidentified fohe maximal cal point T

25-1990). Wt Tbilisi cros

ow of maximr. Kura ha

the method e been recennial value o

=0,31; te value Csoincidence ometers of re

ative average


Maximal WReh

i kal

3

0.022 1 0.036 1 0.086 1 0.137 1

avi rehabilitaiven in Table

he project ro

ossing the reor Tbilisi-Rus

discharges bilisi are ta

Within the mess-section ha

mal water disave been sof moments

eived: of maximal d

s=4Cv, whion the proba

epresentativee square er


Water Dischahabilitation R

K O

5 15 15 15 1

tion road aree #1.

oad

ehabilitation stavi sectionof r. Kura w

aken as anaentioned pead fluctuate

scharges wistatistically s. As a resu

discharges Q

ich is receability cell. eness of therror of the av


rge in M3/SeRoad

G K

1 _1 0.1 0.1 0.

e given on 1

road, r. Kun. The anawithin Tbilisi-alogue. The

eriod the mad from 448

ithin 66 yearprocessed

ult of the pro

Q0=1162 m3/

eived throug

e variation raverage pere


ec for the Go

K I M W

100 years

_ 87.3 .96 30.5 .82 14.5 .83 18.5

1:25000 sca

ura maximal logue meth-Rustavi sec

e date compaximal disch

m3/sec (194

rs of hydrolofollowing ɋ

ocessing, the

/sec;

gh the clos

ange of obseennial maxim


orges Crossi

TMaximal disc

W500 years

W200yea

67.1 4723.4 1611.2 7.14.2 10

ale topograph

annual discod is used ction. The daprises 66 y

harges of r. 47) to 2450

ogical post iɋɇɢɉ require below para

sest empiric

ervations havmal discharg

rvision ) Road

61

ing the

Table #1 charge 0 ars

W100 years

7.4 36.46.5 12.7.89 6.070.0 7.71

hic map

charges for the

ata of r. years of Kura in m3/sec

n Tbilisi rements ameters

cal and

ve been ge value

and vabeen iFrom dischavariourecurrespeciaThe mmaximwell. Ahave b

ThrougsupplyThe vacross-distrib

Hydr The mReseasectioAs thepoint Tof r. Kfor Tb 4.2 Ec 4.2.1 L Landssurroulandsctypicais mainlylandscRelativthe areas secon Due tovarioualkali, Tbilisi.

ariation ratedentified anthe received

arge of varios supply waence rate K

ally processemaximal dischmal dischargAccording tobeen identifi

Average pVariation rValue of as

gh the receiy of r. Kura aalues of the-section accution and th

Supply Gamma-disGumbel dis

ro-meteorolo

maximal discarch of Geon. ere is fairly Tbilisi cross-

Kura identifieilisi-Rustavi

cological Re

Landscape

scapes of Tbundings of Tbcape itself arl for the gras

y woody andcapes have bvely untouch

unsuitable dary natural

o diversity os types. Thforest brow

. Due to the

LoMod

e, which liesd is į=360. d parameterous supply waters have bK for extremed table accoharges of r. es determin

o the mentioed: erennial valuate Cv=0,56symmetry raved parame

are determin various supcording to e Institute o

P% stribution stribution ogical Institu

charges of r.orgia are ac

insignificant-section and

ed for hydrolorehabilitatio

esources –

and Soils

bilisi are divebilisi. Due tore so diversessland of Ea

d mountainobeen significhed landsca

for rural del or cultural l

of natural cohere are grewn and blacem a wide a


s within acce

rs and ordinwaters of r. Kbeen identifi

me values (aording to obKura in Tbilied by the In

oned calcula

ue of maxim6; ate Cs=2Cv=eters and binned. pplies of mathe determf Hydro-MetR. Kura – H

Maximal Wa

0,130303100

te 3480

. Kura identccepted as c

t difference d Tbilisi-Rustogical point n road secti

– Landscape

erse. Many reo this particue. Plain and astern Georg

ous, creatingcantly modifiapes still rem

evelopment. andscapes.

onditions aney-brown, mck soils. Eroarea is occu


eptable limit

nates of threKura has beed through

according toservation peisi are calcunstitute of Hytions the be

mal discharge

=1,12. nominal distr

aximal dischmined three teorology areHydrologicalater Discharg

10 23000 23950 2910

ified by the calculation v

between thtavi rehabilitTbilisi crosson.

e and Flora

egions of spular componhilly part of gia, while th

g altitude zoied on the temain in the

In all rema

nd relief the meadow greyosion procesupied by thin


ts. The aver

ee parameteeen calculateGumbel me

o Gumbel deriod (in our lated on theydro-Meteor

elow parame

es: Q0=1148

ribution func

arges of r. Kparameter

e given in Tal Point Tbilisges Q M3/Se

2214021852765

Institute of values for h

he water cattation road ss-section are

pecific landscnents of land

Tbilisi envirohe landscape

nes. Due toerritory of Tbzone of mo

aining parts

soil of Tbily-brown, husses are obn washed do


rage square

er gamma-fued. The max

ethod as weistribution) icase 66 yea basis of indrological Scieters of the

8 m3/sec;

ction ordinate

Kura in Tbilir gamma-diable #2. si ec

5 1835 1900 2475

Hydro-Metehydrological

tchment bassection, the me deemed as

cape border dscapes andons develope of Western

o human impbilisi. ountain-fores

of the city t

isi and its sumus-sulphabserved in town soils wit


deviation h

unction the mximal discha

ell, during whis selected ars). dividual cataentific Resedistribution f

es values of

si hydrologicistribution,

T10

1630 1680 2270

orological Spoint Tbilis

sins of hydrmaximal discs calculation

r each other the whole

ped the landsn and North

pact original

sts and, par

there are m

surroundingsatic, alluvial,he surroundth different t

rvision ) Road

62

has also

maximal arges of hich the through

strophic earch as function

various

cal post Gumbel

Table #2 20

142515002060

Scientific si cross-

rological charges n values

in the

scape ern part

natural

rtially, in

modified,

s are of saline,

dings of types of

bear laThis s 4.2.2 V The reat the of the discovBotanresearwith thdetailein botanegatihave bCommconse(medicforestsAlong are esmeasu Gener

The pcover vegetaespectime aVegetadiversthe deForest(Quercpart oregionstandsCarpinthe areAt sompreserhackbabove(Rhamtree (C(Jasmsouth-TheselogginFloodpremnawillow Salix efloodpfrom s

and rocks. Inoil has lost i

Vegetation

eport compristudy of theTbilisi-Tsite

very of sensiical descriprch as well ahe aim to obed data on danical termsve and resi

been revealemunities and rvation valucinal, odoros, forage, hawith endang

specially noures should

ral review o

roject area has been

ation are scaially true for

ago. ation cover e and comp

evelopment ht vegetation cus iberica) f the area. I

n. Oak-hornbs (Georgiannus caucasicea as well. me area of trved – remerry (Celtis

e: Georgian mnus pallasiiCotinus cogg

minum frutica-eastern pare communiteg, periodicaplain forestsants only (m (Salix exceexcelsa) sta

plain oak (Qushrubbery: s

LoMod

n the gardents natural sh

ises the resue flora and veli Khidi (Reditive habitatstion of the as our own tain more de

design and cs. Consequedue impact ed. species (inc

ue occur in ous, wild fruay meadow-pgered speciotable; if rebe impleme

of flora and

is located inseverely m

arce in the dr plains, whe

developed plex in termshistory. is diverse inand high m

It is notewobeam (Carpi and high mca, lime - Til

he district (mnants of arcaucasica)maple, Bal

ii), Christ’s tgygria), elm

ans), etc. Thirt of Easternes had beel grazing in ts have bee

mainly in r. Ioelsa, S. albaands. Elm (Uuercus long

salt cedar (T


ns and parkshape and no

ults of the reegetation wid Bridge – bos and commzone of intexperience etailed inform

construction. ently, as a re

on the flora

cluded in Gethe project

uit, fiber, tubpasture, wildes and sens

esidual impanted, which

vegetation

n the geo-bmodified by district (one oere natural v

within the ds of types of

n phyto-cenoountain oakrthy that higinus caucasmountain oalia caucasica

mainly r. Khrrid open wo. Many spelkan maple horn (Paliurleaved sum

is relict foresn Georgia, foen later desthe forest).en also desori floodplaina, S. pseudoUlmus foliac

gipes) are mTamarix ram


s of Tbilisi thow represent

eview of literithin the corrorder with Aunities withiterest is basand knowle

mation enabSuch data i

esult of the aa and veget

eorgian Redt impact zobers, decorad predecesssitive habitaact is detercomprises t

of the proje

otanical disteconomic aof the least wvegetation h

district, despf individual p

ological termk (Quercus mgh mountainsica, Quercuak, Europeaa, field map

rami and Algoodland: picies typical (Acer hyrc

rus spina-chmac (Rhus cost vegetationormed largestroyed due

stroyed. Then). The folloomedii) and cea), nut treixed in sma

mosissima), b


here are soits a cultural

rature and sridor of the p

Azerbaijan) ron the sectionsed upon th

edge. It shoubled to fill in is necessaryabove mentation of the

d List, Red Bone as well ative, drinkinors of cropsts with vario

rmined on tthe restoratio

ect corridor

trict of Kvemactivities of within the re

had been su

pite significaplants and g

ms. Mono-domacranthera oak descen

us iberica) aan ash - Frale - Acer cam

geti basins) stachio (Pisfor arid op

canum), fig hristi), spireaoriaria), lonicn, which had communitieto irrationa

ey have beowing should

asp-willow ee (Juglans all amounts. blackberry (R


ls cultivated variation of

scientific resproject of Tboad and mon. he literatureuld also be nthe existing

y for environioned reseaareas adja

Book, endemas plants

ng, raw ma, etc.).

ous conservathe forests, on of equiva

r

mo (Lower) man. Terr

egions of Eaubstituted wit

ntly limited enesis of fo

ominant foresa) are develonds fairly low

and poli-domraxinus excempestre, etc

relict forest stacia muticpen woodlantree (Ficus

a (Spiraea hcera (Loniced also been pes in Kvemoal exploitatio

een preservd be noted (Populus caregia), mulbThe followi

Rubus sang


to different the original s

earch, whichbilisi-Rustavi ore specifica

e sources anoted that regaps and omental asse

arches the excent to the

mic, rare) of of economiterial and f

ation valueseco-compe

alent forest h

Kartli lowlaitories with

astern Georgth landraces

distribution,rmations as

sts of Georgoped on the w in the me

minant leaveelsior, hornc.) are distrib

species havca) and Cand occur wit

carica), buypericifolia),

era iberica), jpresent in tho Kartli lowlaon of men

ved in the in the companescens, Pberry (Morung are most

guineus), bla

rvision ) Road

63

degree. soil.

h aimed section lly – the

nd field esearch btaining

essment xpected corridor

various c value

firewood

s forests ensation habitat.

nd. The natural

gia). It is s a long

is very well as

gian oak highest

entioned d forest

nbeam - buted in

ve been ucasian thin the

uckthorn , smoke jasmine

he driest and too. (chaotic

form of position: P. nigra, us alba), t typical

ackthorn

(Prunuaustra(Hippo Xerophills aorientathe mewoodla(Astra Steppegrass beard (arid odivers(Artemgrass-beard elevatform oon largFestucXeran Semi-ddevelovegeta(Salsowormw(charaSterigmcenosMedicof the Wetlan(Typha The d It is noof Tbilprojecvegetavariouof eco The seand smland afor higpine anut, Enaturadevelo

us spinosa),alis), silk vinophae rhamn

hilous and hand plateaualis), spirea entioned shrand). Tragagalus microc

e grass form(Botriochloagrass stepp

open woodlae in phyto-c

misia fragran-glasswort (

grass (Paed areas, w

of smaller ploger areas (Aca sulcata,themum squ

desert vegeoped on loation is maiola nodulosawood is enacteristic smostemum es in spring

cago minimabest quality

nd communa latifolia, T.

detailed ch

oteworthy thlis-Rustavi r

ct constructioation of the s conservat

onomic value

ection of KPmall diameteare located agh diversity oare observeduropean ash

ally grown poped canop

LoMod

hawthorn (ne (Periplocnoides), etc.

hemi-xerophus - Christ

(Spiraea hyrubbery is se

acanth commcephalus) an

mations are a ischaemumpe of the arand, floodplacenological ns) and bi-dBotriochloa

aliurus spinawhile needleots on hill slAchillea mic Filagoarve

uarosum, etc

etation occurowlands andnly represe

a) communitntirely domspecies) istorulosm, To- Alissum to

a, Pterotheca(mainly for

ities grow in laxmannii).

haracteriza

hat detailed road. Conseon and operaadjacent arion value ha

e.

P 10-15 km ier tree and sat the area oof vegetationd. Leaved ph, mulberry,plants of sm

py and dry


Crataegus pca graeca), .

ilous shrubbt’s thorn (Pypericifolia),econdary anmunities arend prickly th

developed m) steppe i

rea is seconain forests, pterms. In so

dominant beischaemum

a-christi, Boe grass stepopes and in

crantha, Agroensis, Phlec).

rs within thed depressionted by woties and othinant in w

s observedorularia toruortuosum, Ba marschalliasheep).

n marshes a

tion of the

botanical reequently, negation have breas. Plant cave been ide

is bordered shrubbery foon the edgen cover. Smlants are mo false acacimaller size branches (


pseudoheterold man’s

bery is widesPaliurus spi, poli-dominand developede frequent orift (Acantho

on plains ais the most dary and it

plain and moome areas

eard-grass –m, Salsola notriochloa is

ppe (Stipa p fragments.

ropyron repeeum phleoi

e district (Maons, chestnrmwood (Ar

her semi-deswormwood cd - Caralosa, etc. Eprachypodiumana, etc. Wo

nd wetlands

e flora and

esearch has gative and rbeen revealecommunitiesentified withi

with artificiaor 3 km. Sev of the chan

mall stands oore abundana, plane, ascharacteriz

apricot, pru


rophylla), Blabeard (Cle

spread withiina-christi), ant forb shrd in the formn severely e

olimon leptur

and elevatedwidespread

has developountain oak beard grass

– wormwoodnodulosa) is schaemum) ulcherrima, Poli-domina

ens, Bromusides, Ph.

arneuli and ut and salirtemisia fragsert formatiocenosis. Thgana granphemeras anm distachyonormwood se

s. These com

vegetation

been conduresidual imped both in ths and specien the projec

al water chanveral residennnel. This paof artificially nt, of which sp, and ailanzed by low une, elm, ho


ack Sea dogematis vitalb

n the districtoriental ho

rubbery. Accmer forest areroded dry roides).

d areas (plad. Accordingped on the forests). Bes is combind community

relatively rcomplexes

St. Lessingant grain-fors japonicas, Paniculatum

Gardabani inized soilsgrans) commons are relahe followingndiflora, Snd ephemern, Gagea coemi-desert is

mmunities a

n of the pro

ucted within acts as a re

he project teres (Red Listct impact zon

nnel, which ntial yards, part of the roplanted Turthe followin

nthus. In addviability co

ornbeam) a


gwood (Theba), sea bu

t, namely, slornbeam (Ccording to greas (oak, arslopes – m

ateaus, hills)g to the oriformer fores

eard grass sted with wory is formed

rare. Christ’ss are commgiana) occursb grass are Cynodon d

m, Salvia s

plains). It iss. The semmunities. Glatively rarerg other vegcorzonera rids are abunommutata, Gs the winter

re formed b

oject corrid

the project esult of the prritory and flt, endemic, ne as well a

is followed bpastures andad is not prokish pine an

ng should bedition to largnfirmed by

are present.

rvision ) Road

64

elycrania uckthorn

lopes of Carpinus genesis, rid open

milkvetch

). Beard gin, the st areas teppe is rmwood . Beard s thorn-mon on s in the present

dactylon, sclarea,

s mainly mi-desert

asswort . Edifier getation

lanata, ndant in

G. dubia, pasture

y cattail

dor

corridor planned ora and rare) of s plants

by large d arable ominent nd black e noted: ge trees

weakly . Plants

occurrRussiathorn, In the pastur In the the roabuts the forexistinacquisneed t Semi-dKP 12of yard

Fig4.1 From wherespireathe roaform h Sectiotransitgroundwith sSuch a Proceeduringof the GPS chighwaPinus

ring on dry van olive, Chdogrose, gr

section betres.

section betwad. Mainly Tthis section rest-park alo

ng road passition of a nato cut severa

desert surro2 km of the rds and resid

5. Territory A

KP 13 km te drought resa, blackthornad section a

hardly acces

on of KP 13tional stripe d waters aremall fragmeareas are us

eding from g road widen

road till Marcoordinates ay, at the eeldarica). It

LoMod

valleys and ohrist’s thornreenbrier, cir

tween KP 1

ween KP 10Turkish pineof the road

ong with tamsses next tarrow land sal trees.

ounds the floroad sectiondential plots a

Adjacent to K

the forest besistant plant

n, Christ’s thare not homosible dense

-15 km is rebetween th

e close to thents of differsed for pastu

all of the abning works isrneuli highwaof plot #7 and of the fois a habitat


open woodla, broom, elrsium, fescu

3-15 km of

0-15 km plane, black pine

to the northmarisk, Russto the bordstrip (1m wid

oodplain fore. Nut, mulbealong the hig

Krtsanisi For

ecomes thints are preseorn. The ve

ogenously devegetation.

epresented horny steppehe surface, rent grain pures in summ

bove it coulds mainly antiay branch. are N41036’

orest-park arof medium c


and are morm; and xere, wormwoo

the road m

ntations of coe, cedar andh. Century osian olive, seers of the

dth) at the e

est. Residenterry, pine, ceghway in thi

rest-Park wit

n and steppeent: Russianegetation formense. At som

by only by es and typicmeadow typlants: meadmer.

d be said thicipated with

’28.6’’/E 044rtificial pine conservation


re abundantrophilous shod, etc.

eadows adj

oniferous plad cypress arld asps, flooea-buckthorpark. Wide

edge of the p

tial areas aredar and cys area.

th Elm, Ceda

es are direc olive, almomations formme areas the

thorny and cal floodplaipe thorn-cirs

dow fescue,

hat significanhin KP 0-13,

4056’08.6’’, 3stand is pre

n value.


t at the end hrubbery and

acent to the

ants follow are present. Kodplain oak arn, barberrieening of thepark and is

e observed ypress trees

ar, Plane and

ctly abutted ond, pine, taming the forey are thin, w

herbaceousin forests. Asium formatbluegrass,

nt damage tespecially -

348 m a.s.l.esent – Pinu


of the road d grasses:

e road are u

along the leftKrtsanisi foreand willows s, liana plane road will associated w

at several pare planted

Other Spec

by open womarisk, oakest-park abuwhile at othe

s vegetationAfter 15 kmions are devTimothy-gra

to vegetatio- from the be

. At the sideus sp. (Pinu

rvision ) Road

65

section: Christ’s

used for

t side of est-park grow in

nts. The require

with the

laces at in from

ies

oodland, , prune, utting to ers they

n. It is a , where veloped

ass, etc.

on cover eginning

e of the us nigra,

Picture GPS cRustavconse

Picture GPS weste

e4.16.. Fragm

coordinates vi. Pasturesrvation value

e 4.17 Pastu

coordinates rn edge of t.

LoMod

ments of Arti

of plot #8 as occur withe.

ures

of plot #9 . Rustavi, wh


ificial Pine S

re N41035’1hin the sect

are N41033here pasture


tand – End o

0.6’’/E 0440

tion adjacen

3’46.2’’/E 04es are prese


of Krtsanisi F

56’59.5’’, 36nt to Martko

44057’55.6’’,nt. It is a ha


Forest-Park

63 m a.s.l. Itopi turn. It

, 368 m a.sbitat of low c


t is the territois a habitat

s.l. It is theconservation

rvision ) Road

66

ory till t. t of low

e south-n value.

Picture 4.2.3 E Protec

The rothe rivprotecpark. Tfor thehas alnot vefrom tvegetain parcrusheMtkva After tidentifthe prohabita GPS chighwaPinus

e 4.18. Pastu

Ecologically

cted areas

oad project wver Mtkvari ct the biodiveThe forest ine locals, andlmost adopt

ery numerouthe river Mation cover articular, fromer (14 km), ri floodplain

the completiofication of seoject area d

ats or ecosys

coordinates ay, at the eeldarica). It

LoMod

ures

y Sensitive

will not affecflow. The oersity in then the park wd at the end ed the natus animal po

Mtkvari floodand fauna. T

m the railwaruns along

.

on of the deensitive areaoes not inclu

stems. Below

of plot #7 and of the fois a habitat


Sites

ct any of theonly site pose region of Tas restored of the Sovieral structure

opulation devdplain will uThe second ay bridge al the edge o

etailed botanas and their ude any secw the only id

are N41036’orest-park arof medium c


e protected ssible to thiTbilisi-Rustavin the 1940-

et era, it wase of the floodveloped in itundoubtedlyvariant of lalong the rivof Krtsanisi

nical survey odetailed des

ction of ecolodentified area

’28.6’’/E 044rtificial pine conservation


areas. Gardnk of the avi road cons-50s. For a ls used as a dplain forest. The foresty lead to thaying the roaer Mtkvari woodland

of the desigscription hasogically valua of medium

4056’08.6’’, 3stand is pre

n value.(Pic.


dabani reserrea of a cestruction, is long time it wrecreationa

st and there t fragmentathe further dad describedbank (5 kmpark isolatin

ned project s become pouable and se

m sensitivity i

348 m a.s.l.esent – Pinu 4.16)


rve is locatertain importKrtsanisi wo

was less accal area. A pre

is a stable,ion and its idegradation d in the “doc

m) to Rustavng it from th

corridor the ossible. To sensitive lands presented

. At the sideus sp. (Pinu

rvision ) Road

67

ed down tance to oodland cessible esent, it though solation

of the cument”, vi stone he river

precise sum up, scapes,

d:

e of the us nigra,

Spec It is nopresenidentifstatus specieAs a specieThe liscorridoʋ

2

4

As a rList o In addprojecbecomspecie 4.3 Ec 4.3.1 G In a zMtkvaThe msteppearidha

ies Include

oteworthy thnt the furthfication of gr categories)

es shall increresult of t

es of the Rst and statuor, are given

Latin Na

Juglans

Ulmus m

esult of the f Georgia w

dition, it is noct area, i.e.ming extinct)es shall pres

cological Re

General des

zoo-geograpri of Iran-Tu

main landscae vegetationabitats. At pr

LoMod

ed in Red L

hat Red Listher modificarass species) is in procesease significhe detailed

Red List of Guses of the n below: ame

regia L.

minor

preconstrucwill not occur

oteworthy th: Elaeagnu). As a res

sumably incr

eceptors - F

scription of

phic respecturan provincape here, wn with Shybresent, the g


List of Geo

t of Georgiaation of spes by IUCN css. Through cantly in the d field botaGeorgia hasspecies of G

A

tion botanicar in the proje

at some rareus angustifoult of preco

rease.

Fauna

f fauna

, the given ce of Meditewhich is an bliak inclusiogiven area is


orgia and F

, which conecies in thecategories (extrapolatioRed List.

anical reseas been founGeorgian Re

Com

Angiosperm

Nut t

Field

al surveys wect corridor.

e, endangerolia (rare plonstruction b

territory maerranean zoaccumulativ

ons. There s mostly cov


Found in th

sists of 56 se Red List determinatio

on of the me

arch only tnd - Juglansed List, whi

mmon Name

ms

tree

d elm

we presume

red and vulnants), Pinubotanical su

ay be attribuoo-geographve plain, is are animals

vered with a


he Project

species of pis being c

on of their sentioned data

two species regia L. anch are obse

CatStaSta

VU

VU

that other s

nerable specs eldarica

urveys the e

uted to the ic sub-zonecovered wits here mosagricultural p


Corridor

plants, is notonducted. N

state and proa the numbe

s from thend Ulmus minerved in the

tegory Refte and Protus

species of t

cies occur wi(species, wexisting list

region of te of Holarctith semi-stepstly preferrinplots - pastu

rvision ) Road

68

t full. At Namely, otection er of the

e list of nor Mill.

e project

flecting otection

the Red

ithin the which is

of rare

he river c zone.

ppe and ng open res and

ʋ

1.

2.

3. 4.

5.

6. 7.

cornfiesome poplarlancelethe lowother aand bulocals The faimpovpopularecreawoodlaNear lnegati Despitextensthink t Urban– 11+6 The st(shiblijIt occ17+00distrib Table4

ʲʨʯʰʴʻʸ

Rhinoloph

Rhinoloph

Cricetulus

Mesocrice

Meriones t

Buteo rufin

Aquila heli

elds near theplaces. Ther and willowet and ivy unwer reachesareas, no foushes - blacfor their veg

auna in the erished as ated it and ational purpoand park, wlocation of tve impact o

te the fact tsion area of he identifica

ized sites (w600 andkm1

teppes, hillyjak), dwarf-s

cupies the g0.There are ution of the

4.13. Anima

ʸʰʫʨʹʨˆʬʲʬ

us euryale

us mehelyi

migratorius

tus brandti

tristrami

nus iac

LoMod

e bank of th floodplain la

w riparian wndergrowth s of the riverest vegetatckberry, lancgetable patc

considered the human intensely u

oses. A partwhich is madthe settled an the conten

hat the faundifferent spe

ation of two g

with dense to7+00 – 17+

y and foothilshrub (phryggreatest pa

saline areaprotected sp

al species inc

ʬʩʨ ʽʨʸʯ

˃ʻ˃ʻʳ˄ʹʨʳˆʸʬ

ʳʬˈʬʲʰ

ʴʨ˂ʸʰʹʨʳʰʬʸʱ

ʳ˂ʰʸʬʨ

ʼʸʰʴʭʬʭʬʲʰʹʱʩʬʽʵʩʰ


he river Mtkvandscape fo

woodland onis preserved

er. There artion grows hcelet, blackthes.

area - withinstarted to

uses it for at of the conde up of theareas and ant of fauna in

na in the givecies over thgroups of bio

own or villag800.

ll landscapegana) and sert of the fuas here andpecies by the

cluded in the

ʻʲʰʫʨʹʨˆʬ

˄ʵʭʸʬʩʰ ʬʯʻʲʰ˂ˆʭʰ

ʰʹ˂ˆʭʰʸʴʨʲ

ʹʼʬʸʰʮʨʮʻʱʨʭʱʨʹʰʻʸʰʮ

ʨʮʰʻʸʰʳʬʽʭ

ʬʲʬʩʰ ʱʨʱʨˁʨ ʰʹʨʸ˄ʰʭʰ


vari, with irriollows the rivn the right bd only on there large treeere. The bedhorn, hawth

n the road ccultivate the

agricultural, nstruction coe forests groabsence of n the given a

ven area mahe sites covotypes purpo

ge developm

es witch Botemi-desert veuture constrd there aloe landscape

e Red Data L

ʬʲʬʩʨ ʪʨ

ʰʸʴʨʲʨ M

ʲʨ M

ʻʴʬʲʨ Gʮʨʮʻʴʨ Br

ʭʰˀʰʨ Tr

LoIm


igated cornfver bank as abank of thee territory of es preservedds of small rorn and lou

corridor and e given areeconomic,

orridor lies nown by humfence or oth

area.

ay be considvered with difoseful:

ment and ind

triochloa andegetation ovruction areang the sect

e types is giv

List of Georg

ʨʭʸ˂ʬʲʬʩʻʲ

editerranean

ehely's Hor

reyDwarf Harandt'sHams

ristram'sJird

ong-legged Bmperial Eagle


ields and vea narrow str river MtkvaKrtsanisi wo

d in the woorivers are ovt. They are

adjacent ara long timeindustrial, w

next to the tmans and is her defensiv

dered as a sfferent bioty

ustrial enter

d Stipa stepver the hill sla of the roation. Below,

ven.

gia(2006)

ʲʰʹʨˆʬʲ˄ʵ

n Horseshoe

rseshoe Bat

amster ster

Buzzard e


egetable garip. The abelari with blacoodland parodland parkvergrown witmostly used

reas - is vere ago, has waste dispoterritory of Ka recreation

ve structures

single compypes is differ

rprises) - km

ppes, dry shlopes and inad. - km1, in the tab

ʵʫʬʩʨ

ʹʺʨʺ

ʻʹʰ

e Bat VU

VU

VUVU

VU

VUVU

rvision ) Road

69

rdens at e, black ckberry, k and in

k. As for th reeds d by the

ry much densely sal and

Krtsanisi nal site. s has a

plex, the rent. We

m11+300

hrubland n gullies. 1+00 –

ble 4.13

ʻʸʩʨʴʻ

ʲʰ

ʹʺʬʶʰ

+

+ +

+

+

+

+ +

ʪʨʳʵʿʬ Coloniebuildincaves, fo estColoniebuildin avessteppeIn stonIn the fpastureIn the fpasture PossibNutrien

8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

17. 18.

19. 20.

21.

22.

23. 24. 25. 26.

Aquila chry

Neophron

Aegypius m

Gyps fulvu

Falco cher

Falco biarm

Aegolius fu

Grus grus

Panurus b

Testudo gr

Ophisops e

Eryx jaculu

Eirenis col

Pelobates

Sabanejew

Manduca a

Bombus fr

Xylocopa v

Onychogoassimilis

One stributaof techand lu SpeciSmall their hturtlesMtkvadestru ParticubuildinMtkvaold buand zothe daformed

ysaetos percnopteru

monachus us rrug micus unereus s iarmicus

raeca elegans

us llaris

syriacus

wia aur ta

atropos ragrans viola ea mphus

species of fiaries - Goldshniques beybricants.

es not protmammals a

habitats are s (Emys orbri at the righ

uction damag

ularly sensitngs and hollri may be de

uildings are tone of layingates of the d in the holl

LoMod

ʳʯʰʹʨʸus ʼʨʹʱʻʴ

ʹʭʨʭʰ ʵʸʩʰ ʪʨʭʨʮʰ˄ʰʯʬʲ˅ʵʺʰ ʸʻˆʰ˄ʻʲʭʨˀʽʭʬ˄ʨʸˆʳʬʲʯʱʵˆʺʨʪ

ʫʨʹʨʭʲʹʨʿʬʲʵʨʳʼʰʩʰʹʰʸʰʻ

˃ʭʲʵʭ˄ʰʴʨʨʮ

ʳ˄ʬʸʬʩʹʼʰʴʽʹʭʬʲʰʹʫʰʰʹʼʬʸʳʹʪʨʭʹʰ

sh included sideloach (Syond the rive

ected by thand reptiles n

disturbed dicularis) ma

ht bank of thging the site

tive to the low trees asemolished into be demolg the road alconstructionows. Prior to


ʸ˄ʰʭʰ ʴˇʰ

ʰ ʲʯʨʭʨˀʨʭʨʸʫ

ʬʸʵ ˀʨ˄ʰʭ˄ʰʭʨ ʳʨʭʲʬʩʰ

ʯʨˀʻʨʮʾʭʬʯʪʭʬʲʯʨʭʨ

ʲʻʸʰʳʨˆʸˁʵʰʨʴʰʬʰʸʬʴʰʬʩʰ ʲʰʳʿʭʨʸʰ

ʭʨʴʰʯʬʭʮʬʩʰʮʰʻʸʰʪʭʬʲʨ

ʩʰ ʹʰʳʱʭʫʨʸʯʨʫʰʫʰʩʨʮʰʸʰʽʹʰʲʵʱʵʰʴʬʳʹʰʿʲʨʶ

in the NatioSabanejewia er floodplain

e law not included

during the coay perish if e river or if ts of their ov

loss of shes shelters. Sn case varianlished. Sevelong the exis

n start-up, tho the constr


GEgCiEuSa

ʫʬʴʰ LaBoCoBe

ʯʰʹʱʻ MSn

ʵʩʬʲʨ Wʰʹʰ Co

Sy

ʰ ʨʴʨ G

ʨʭʨ De

Viʵʶʨ Viʶʰʨ Da

onal Red Daurata). Pa

n borders so

d in the Red onstruction wfuel pours ithe operatioiposition.

elter are chSmall caves nt 2 is realizeral large hosting road, ahere may mruction work


olden E glegyptian Vultuinereous Vuurasian Griffackeranner Falconoreal Owlommon Craearded Ti

editerraneannake-EyedL

WesternSandollaredDwar

yrian Spade

oldsideloach

eath’s Headiolet Carpeniolet Carpenark Pincerta

ata List dwearticular atteno that to avo

Data List mworks. For in the water

on of the tec

eiroptera, thin the rocks

zed. Under thollow trees aand they are maternal (nidks start-up, t


eurelturefon

n

ne

n Tortoise izard

dBoarfSnake

foot Toad

h

Sphinx ter bee ter bee

ail

ells in the rntion is needoid the wate

may perish ininstance mars of the brahniques cau

he bats. Ths on the righe project, a

are growing to be liquida

difugous) or the trees mu


VUVUENVUCRVUVUENVU

VUVU

UVU

EN

VU

ENVUVUVU

iver Mtkvari ded to avoid

er pollution w

n minor quanany Europeaanches of t

uses the rive

hey use cavht bank of t

a great propoin the settleated. Depenwinter colo

ust be exam

rvision ) Road

70

+ + + + + + + +

+

+ +

+

+ +

+

and its d fueling with fuel

ntities, if an pond he river

er banks

ves, old the river ortion of

ed areas nding on onies be ined for

NutrienNutrienNutrienNutrienIn the fIn the fPossibIn the fPossib HabitaDwels KumisiH bitaHabita In stanwaterc In the Mbranchtributar HabitaHabitaHabitaPropagwaterc

the prrepresin GeoEuropTable hollowduringspecie Table #

1. Rhfe

2. Rhhip

3. Rh

4. Rh

5. Ep

6. My

7. My

8. Pi

9. Pi

10. Pi

11. Ny

12. Ny

13. Pl

The ooperatbreed form ccavesare to Tbilisi- All cheEuroptrees t It shousubjecornitho Table #

1 L

2 M

resence of bsentatives oforgia, and ae (EUROBA2). Only C

ws of the agg the breedines will be da

4.14.Cheiro

Latin nhinolophus rrumequinumhinolophus pposideros hinolophus e

hinolophus m

ptesicus sero

Myotis blythii

Myotis mystac

ipistrellus pip

ipistrellus py

ipistrellus ku

yctalus noct

yctalus leisle

lecotus aurit

nly group oftion, is cheiryoung anim

colonies in l. Besides, thbe demolis

-Rustavi roa

eiroptera in e (EUROBAto be cut dow

uld be notedct of societaologists (bird

4.15.Mamm

LatLepus europ

Myocastor c

LoMod

bats and anf the Ministry

all of them aATS). 13 ba

Common Nocged abele treng of youngmaged less,

optera specie

name

m

euryale

mehelyi

rotinus

cinus

pistrellus

ygmaeus

uhlii

ula

eri

tus

f animals unroptera. Ten mals (materness crowde

hree bat speshed and oldad and const

Georgia areATS). The pwn can be e

d that there al interest. d-watchers).

mals interest

tin name paeus coypus


ny facts of y of Environmre protected

at species arctule Bat (Nee hollows,

g birds, will b, if some ind

es likely to d

CommGreaterHBat Lesser HBat MediterraHorseshoMehely's Bat SerotineLessermobat WhiskereCommonSopranoPKuhl’sPip

NoctuleLesser NBrownLoBat

nder the danspecies of t

nity coloniesd basement

ecies (see tad trees are ttruction of ne

e protected presence of examined wit

is a range These are They includ

ing to the loc

EuroCoy


bats dwellinmental Proted under the re likely to oNyctalus nocthe nidifugo

badly damagdividual trees

dwell in the r

mon nameorseshoe

orseshoe

anean oeBat Horseshoe

ouse-eared

edMyotis n PipistrellePipistrelle pistrelle

octule ong-eared

nger of a sigthem form cos) and wintets or attics, ble 4.14) forto be cut doew sites.

under the Abat populat

th ultrasound

of species swild specie

de eight mam

cal populatio

Common opeanBrownpu


ng in them ection of GeAgreement occur withinctula) formsous coloniesge the givens are cut dow

road constru

Georʫʰʫʰ˂ˆʭ

ʳ˂ʰʸʬ˂ˆʭ

ʹʨʳˆʸʬʯʲʨ

e ʳʬˈʬʲʰʹ

ʳʬʪʭʰʨʴʬʿʻʸ˄ʭʬʺ

ʻʲʭʨˀʨʳˇʻˇʨʾʨʳʶʨ˄ʰʨʾʨʳˆʳʬʲʯʨˀʸʰ ʳʬʾʨʳʻʸʪʰʪʨʴʺʻʸʻˆʰʿʻʸ

gnificant harolonies - the

er colonies wundergroun

rm colonies own in the pr

Agreement otions in the d detectors

spread in thes and spec

mmals given

on

namen Hare


must be coorgia. Thereon the Cons the limits o

s significant s. Cutting don populationwn.

uction corrido

rgian name ʭʰʸʴʨʲʨ

ʭʰʸʴʨʲʨ

ʻʲʰ˂ˆʭʰʸʴ

˂ˆʭʰʸʴʨʲʨ

ʾʨʳʻʸʨ ʺʨʳʾʨʳʰʵʩʰ

ʳʾʨʳʰʵʩʰ ʳʵʸʰ ʳʵʸʰ ˀʻʨʮʾʭʰʹʾʨ

ʸʨ ʻʸʰʳʬʾʨʳʻʸʸʨ

m during thee nidifugous when they h

nd communicin tree hollo

rocess of w

on the Consbuildings to

e constructiocies interestn in table 4.1

Geoʱʻʸʫʾʬʲʴʻʺʸʰʨ


ommunicatede are 29 bat servation of of the corrid

populationsown of suchn of bats. Ot

or

SheBuildicavesBuildicaves

ʴʨ BuildicavesBuildicavesTreesBuildicavesBuildiBuildiBuildi

ʨʳʵ Buildi

Treesʸʨ Trees

Buildi

e road buildcolonies wh

hibernate. Tcations andows. The pidening the

servation of o be demoli

on area, whting to touri5 below.

orgian namʲʰ

rvision ) Road

71

d to the species

f Bats in or (See s in the h a tree ther bat

elters ngs,

s ngs,

sngs,

s ngs,

ss ngs,

s ngs ngs ngs ngs

s s ngs

ding and hen they The bats

natural remises existing

Bats in shed or

hich is a sts and

me

3 4 5 6 M

7 M

8 F

A red animamove wood 4.3.2D Urbanintensmade speciequite scats, vlikely. The ooperatbreed form ccavesto be Tbilisi-All cheEuroptrees t The s(shiblijThere cross “documacrossDue toand envillageless lik The aalternaappeaThe arand laspecie A Syriof variThesecurren

Canis lupus Canis aureu

Vulpes vulpe

Meles meles

Martes mart

Felis silvestr

fox often apals in the tab

along the rand bush isl

Description

nized sitesTe noise andup of mino

es, such as stable to thevillage and s

nly group oftion, is cheiryoung anim

colonies in l. Besides, thdemolished

-Rustavi roaeiroptera in e (EUROBAto be cut dow

steppes, hilljak), dwarf-sare saline the given la

ment”), the rs the given lao the busy ronterprises, a

e, shepherd'kely. As for o

area of Tristrating width, ar at the end rea of a Snaake Kumisi. es to appear

ian Spadefoant 3.

e sites are usnts and findin

LoMod

us es s tes ris

ppears on thble use the river. Most olands along

of Biotops

The animals illuminationor species. rats, mice a

e changing cstray dogs, t

f animals unroptera. Ten mals (materness crowde

hree bat sped and old tread and const

Georgia areATS). The pwn can be e

y and foothshrub (phrygareas here andscape frroad runs acandscape frooads (Tbilisiall natural fus and stray other specie

ram'sJird (Mand the coof summer.

ake-EyedLizaHow far it

r cannot be e

oot Toad (Pe

sed by manyng food.


GreyJackRedEuraEuroWild

he road to sterritory irre

of the mammthe rivers an

in Project A

s dwelling inn in the night

The numband sparrowonditions anthe appeara

nder the danspecies of t

nity coloniesd basement

ecies (See Taees are to truction of nee protected presence of examined wit

ill landscapegana) and se

and there. rom KP 9,5 cross the steom KP 7.5-8i-Red Bridgenctions of thdogs, the a

es, they are u

Meriones trisolonies of th ard (Ophisopgoes westw

excluded on

elobates syri

y large birds


yWolfkalFox

asianBadgeropeanPine Md Cat

seize the anegularly, witmals appearnd channels

Area

n the develot period. Theer of indivis, is genera

nd anthropogance of any

nger of a sigthem form cos) and wintets or attics, able 2) formbe cut dowew sites. under the Abat populat

th ultrasound

es witch Botemi-desert veUnder variakm to Rust

eppes from 8 km to Ruste and Tbilisihe area are appearance under a tens

strami) on thhese rodents

ps elegans)wards is nothe plain wi

riacus) propa

s of prey to a


rMarten

nimals perishth more or lr in Krtsanis

s.

oped areas, ere is a sociedual specie

ally great. Hogenic impactprotected sp

gnificant harolonies - the

er colonies wundergroun

m colonies in wn in the pro

Agreement otions in the d detectors.

triochloa andegetation ov

ants 1 and 2tavi entry. AKP 14 km t

tavi entry. -Tetritskaro)diminished.of protected

se pressure

he right bans in the con

is known in ot known, bth the road r

agates in the

ascent, hove


ʳʪʬʲʰ ʺʻʸʨ ʳʬʲʨ ʳʨˁʭʰ ʺʿʰʹʱʭʬʸʺʿʰʹʱʨʺʨ

hed in the cess probab

si woodland

are used toety develope

es, except towever, the t. Due to a lapecies in the

m during thee nidifugous when they h

nd communictree hollows

ocess of wid

on the Consbuildings to

d Stipa stepver the hill sl2 (version “pAccording toto Rustavi e

), near locat Because of

d large mamof preying

nk of the rivnstruction co

the environsut the probrunning acro

e watercours

ering in the a


ʸʴʨ ʨ

car accidentsility, to find park and o

o people aned in the givtotally synangiven socie

arge numbee given area

e road buildcolonies wh

hibernate. Tcations ands. The premdening the

servation of o be demoli

ppes, dry shlopes and inplan”), the ro variant 2 (ntry. Varian

tion of settlef a great nu

mmals in the

ver Mtkvari iorridor are

s of Ialguji mability of th

oss it (varian

ses along th

ascending w

rvision ) Road

72

s. Other food or

on small

nd cars, ven area nthropic

eties are r of wild

a is less

ding and hen they The bats

natural ises are existing

Bats in shed or

hrubland n gullies. road will (version t 3 runs

ed areas mber of area is

is of an likely to

mountain e given

nt 3).

he route

warm air

1. 2. 3.

4.

5.

6.

The main fStopping sFeeding siHabitat o(MesocriceHabitat of and SnakeGeorgia Habitat of Red Data LA possibleData List o

LoMod

functions of site during thte during bre

of GreyDwaetus brandti)

Mediterranee-EyedLizard

Syrian SpaList of Georg

e habitat of Tof Georgia.


the given sehe migration eeding the yarf Hamst),the mammaean Tortoisd (Ophisops

adefoot Toagia Tristram'sJird


ection are asof a range o

young birds aer (Cricetuals included e (Testudo

s elegans), t

d (Pelobate

d (Meriones


s follows: of large birdsand autumn ulus migrat

in the Red Dgraeca), W

he reptiles i

es syriacus),

s tristrami), t


s of prey roaming

torius) andData List of

WesternSandncluded in t

, the amphi

he species


d Brandt'sHGeorgia

dBoa (Eryx jhe Red Data

bianincluded

included in t

rvision ) Road

73

Hamster

jaculus) a List of

d in the

the Red

5. Soc5.1. D

Tbilis123. Twhen The p2005 growthand m Table 2010)4

Tbilisi with Gwere a Table

Rusta

4Source

cio-Econoemography

i Tbilisi populapolitical turmopulation nuunequal groh rate has b

migration.

5.1 Numbe4

population Georgians – actually the m

5.2 Ethnica

avi

e: National Sta

LoMod

mic Condiy

ation reachemoil occurredumber moreowth has ocbeen caused

er of live bir

has always Armenians, minority in th

al Groups L

atistical Office


itions

ed maximumd, the city poe or less staccurred (Tabd by two ma

rths, deaths

been multi-Azeri, Russ

he capital. T

Living in Tbi

of Georgia, Th


m in 1992 – 1opulation haabilized in 2ble 5.1). Durajor factors:

s and natura

-ethnical. Msians, UkrainTable 5.2 sho

ilisi

he number of p


1.276 millions decreased

2004-2005 aring the reclow natality

al growth of

any ethnicanians, Jews,ows ethnical

people as of 1 J


n people. In d by almost 1and reachedent decade

y rate, which

f population

l groups live, Greeks, etcl groups of T

January is prov


the following15 %. 1.08 millionthe low po

h equals dea

n in Tbilisi (

ed in the citc. In XIX GeTbilisi in 1876

vided for each

rvision ) Road

74

g years,

n. From pulation ath rate

(2000-

ty along eorgians 6-2002.

year

124. Sshows Table Years Popula(thouspeople Table Years Numbborn NumbdeceaIncrea The mdistrib Table EthnicGeorgAzeri ArmenOssetRussiaAbkhaGreekUkrainIezid Other Garda125. G39 villresideThesealso pPopulacenterdue tocanceThe m 5.2 SO

5Statisti

Small increas the dynami

5.3 Dynam

2ation sand e)

1

5.4Natality20

er of 12

er of ased

1

ase 94

majority of Rution of the

5.5 Distribu

cal group gian

nian ian an azian k nian

abani Gardabani mages. Large

ents, Sartitche are mainly resent – 0.7ation densityrs as Tbilisi o the fact thlled, the sign

main fields of

OCIO-ECON

ics according t

LoMod

ase of Rustaics of Rustav

ics of Rusta

2007 117.9

y has increa006 238

144

4

Rustavi poputown popula

ution of pop

municipality ce villages arehala – 7.0 thethnical Ge

7 % as well ay within the and Rustav

hat major panificant field f agriculture

NOMIC CHA

to 2002 data


avi populatiovi population

avi Populat

2008117.3

ased in Rust20071246

1136

110

lation is Geation accordi

pulation by

Number102 1514993280914103536442573952934885

consists of 4e: Gamarjvehousand resorgians – 54

as Russians municipality

vi are the maart of the inof populatioare: vegetab

ARACTERIS


on has occun growth acc

tion 2007-20

2009117.4

tavi in the r2008161

115

308

orgian – 88 ing to nation

nationalitie

Perc884213<1<1<1<14

42 residentiaeba – 53 thosidents. The4.2 % and A– 0.7 % and

y is 100-125ain means odustrial ente

on employmeble growing,

TICS


urred duringcording to 1

011

201119

recent years89

1

% of the ponalities.

es

centage

al settlemenousand reside total popu

Azeri – 43.6 %d Ossetians 5 residents pof employmeerprises hasent is agricu milk produc


g the last fivJanuary, 20

0 209.5 12

s 20091666

1261

405

opulation. T

ts, 1 town, 2dents, Martklation is 114%. Small gro– 0.4 %5. per square ent of the pos either stop

ulture. ce, fruit and


ve years. Ta011 situation

011 20.8

20101824

1095

729

Table 5.5 sho

2 large villagkopi – 7.7 th4 thousand oup of Arme

km. Such inopulation. Hopped functio

flower grow

rvision ) Road

75

able 5.3 .

ows the

ges and housand

people. enians is

ndustrial owever, oning or

ing.

Indus Tbilis126. Rcontinindustof larmicroeamounof otheand ve Table

Along countrindust Rusta 127. TmanufMetallThe g2007 m

Table

6Source7Source

try

i Recovery of ued throughrial producti

rge scale eelectronics, nts. Currentler alcoholic egetables), p

5.6 Produc

with the grories total indrial products

avi

There are facturing courgical Planrowth of themade 98, 3%

5.7 Dynam

e: National Stae: Department

LoMod

economic, inh the first deon in Tbilisi enterprises textile and oly, relativelyand nonalco

production o

ction in ind

owth of indusustrial produs, in moneta

26 large eompanies at”, JSC “Heie cost of pro% (Table5.7)

ics of grow

atistical Office t of statistics


ncluding indecade of thestill remainsin the sec

others eithery well develooholic bever

of constructio

ustrial sect

strial producuction is alsory terms, is

nterprises ore: JSC “Kdelberg Geooduction an).

wth of servic

of Georgia. htt


dustrial, active new millens very low cctors of her do not fun

oped industrrages, food on materials

tor in Tbilis

ction in Tbiliso increasingproduced in

on the terrKarat Plus” orgia”, JSC “d service of

ce and prod

tp://www.geos


vities startednnium Tablecompared toeavy machction or ma

rial sectors aprocessing ( (cement, as

i (in current

si, the share . At present Tbilisi.

itory of Ru(former “E

“Jeosteel”, Jf different b

duced good

tat.ge/


d in second he 5.6.Despito its levels ininery, electnufacture goare wine pro(meat and dsphalt).

t prices, ml

of the capitaabout 45%

stavi, from Energy Inve

SC “Kazbegbranches and

s in 2004-20


half of 1990-te the revitan Soviet timetric machineoods in veryoduction, prodairy product

n GEL)6

al city in theof Georgia’s

which the st”), JSC “

gi” and etc.d spheres in

009�

rvision ) Road

76

-ies and alization, e. Many es and y limited oduction ts, fruits

s

largest “Rustavi

n 2004-

Accordshare sphere

Garda128. Eis locapowerproducdistrictproducenterpfood in Agricu Tbilis 129. Aproducwere sover thOffice (Tablethe citcity orrelated Table

ding to 2007makes 89.9

es is very litt

abani Electro energated here, wr stations onced by the sts of Transction are lo

prises of thendustry..

ulture

i

Agriculture cts producesold mostly he last two dof Goegria

e 5.8) It is unty in 2006. Inr around it. Md to this sect

5.8 Agricul

LoMod

7 data, manu9 % ; buildintle.

getics is nothich is the lan the upperstations is diss-Caucasus.ocated in Ge district. Fru

was well ded here inclto Tbilisi ma

decades. Acvalue adde

nclear whethn general, thMoreover, thtor.

lture Prices


ufacturing ing industry m

teworthy fromargest in Trar highway ostributed in T Industrial

Gardabani. Guit, grape an

eveloped inuded fruits, arkets.44 Agccording to sed of agriculher this statishere is very lhere is furthe

s between 2


ndustry playsmakes – 2.7

m industrial ans-Caucasuof Kura andTbilisi and Renterprises

Gardabani cnd vegetabl

n suburbs ovegetables

gricultural prtatistical infolture in Tbilistical data initle informat

er more limit

006 and 200


s the leading% and the

fields, as Gus and started Samgori aRustavi, as w

of construcarton-rubere processin

of Tbilisi uns, meat androduction haormation prosi reduced anclude agriction availableed informati

08 (in mln G


g role in Russhare of the

ardabani theed functioninare also impwell as entirection mater

roid plant isg plants sho

ntil 1990-ies dairy prod

as been decrovided by theamounted 1ulture in thee on agriculton on enviro

GEL)


stavi econome rest branch

ermal powerng in 1963. portant. Thee Georgia anrial, light ans one of thould be note

s. Main agructs. The preased drame National S mln GEL b

e villages thatural activitieonmental pre

rvision ) Road

77

mics. It’s hes and

r station 5 hydro

e power nd other nd food he large ed from

ricultural products matically Statistica by 2009 at joined es in the essures

Rusta 130. Tarea o435.68 Garda 131. Tha of aland. The deggplamelon An avlocal mtons ovegetasweet The aggrain p Emplo TbilisUnem Table ActiveEmploHairedSelf emvagueUnemUnemActiveEmplo DespitGendeworkinnon-go(see T Table

avi

There is scarof the city is 8 ha, includi

abani

The total arearable lands

ominant croants, cabbags, melons, b

erage of 70market annuof maize, 10ables, 176 tocherries, 12

gricultural prproduction a

oyment and

i ployment lev

5.9 Employ

Status e Population oyed d mployed

e ployed ployment lev

e level (%) oyment level

te the State er Advisory ng on gendeovernment s

Table 5.11).

5.10Unemp

LoMod

rce data on 6060 ha. Thng 165.68 h

ea of the diss,2193 ha of

ops in the dges, onions,barley. etc.

0022 tons ofually, includin0 tons of beons of pears21 tons of ap

roduction waand poultry b

d Unemploy

vel in Tbilisi

yment and U

(labors)

vel (%)

(%)

Strategy onCouncil un

er equality sectors), the

ployment an


the agricultuhe total areaa of non-agr

trict is 1609f hayfields, 2

istrict are w cucumbers

f agriculturalng 6900 tons

eans, 967 tos, 98 tons ofpricots, 56 to

as a priority breeding rem

yment Level

is very high

Unemploym

Gender Eqder the Chaissues in G

e number of

nd Gender i


ural activitiesa transferredricultural lan

900 ha, inclu22183 ha of

wheat and ms, bell peppe

l products ps of wheat,

ons of sunflof quinces, 2ons of grape

sector for Gmain the prio

ls

. During nea

ment Levels

2005 y.429.8305.0248.955.60.5124.829.054.438.6

uality elaborair of Parlia

Georgia (inclemployed m

issues (20


s in Rustavi d to physicands and 270.

uding 66899grasslands

maize and thers, potatoes

roduced in t1210 tons ofowers, 45 to24 tons of p

es, 1670 tons

Gradabani Diorities of the

arest last yea

s

2006 y434.7303.6248.853.81.0131.130.252.937.0

rated by the ament and tuding repre

men in Tbilis

000-2008 yea


and its surrl and legal p.00 ha of ag

ha of agricuand 17079 h

e following s, carrots, gr

the district af barley, 35

ons of potatplums, 121 ts of grapes.

strict. At pre region.

ar’s it’s had

. 2007480.346.291.55.20.0 134.28.055.339.8

group of repthe Governmesentatives osi is higher t

ars) m-men


roundings. Tpersons amoricultural lan

ultural landsha of nonpro

annuals: tomrapes, whea

are deliveredtons of oats

toes, 46780ons of cherr

esent vegeta

achieved 29

7 y. 207 431 300 24

2 610.1

6 120 293 528 36

presentativemental Comof governmethan that of

n; W-women

rvision ) Road

78

The total ounts to nds.

s, 37035 oductive

matoes, at, water

d to the s, 11500

tons of ries and

able and

9-30%.

008 y.30.102.140.6

.41

28.09.82.46.8

es of the mmission

ent and women

n

Status

Unem

Active

Emplo

During Table

Rusta132. ARustavemploenterptotal n GardaThe pindustHowevprovidgrowin Infras Tbilis

s

ployment lev

e level (%)

oyment level

g nearest las

e 5.11 Avera

avi According tovi enterprise

oyed people prises -14,2 umber of em

abani population drial centersver, as manyes a large

ng, dairy farm

structure an

i

LoMod

vel (%)

(%)

st 15 years e

age wages.

Y1111122222222220

o 2008 dataes, among t

is divided %; small ent

mployed peo

density varies like Tbilisy of the indushare of e

ming, fruit an

nd Developm


2000y.

20

w.-9.7 m11.0

w.10m-11

w-57.2 m-75.1

w-m-75

w-51.6 m-66.0

w-m-67

employed pu

1995-2008

Year Amo995y 1996y 2997y 4998y 5999y 6000y 7001y 9002y 11003y 12004y 15005y 20006y 27007y 36008y 53008w 53

a of departmthem 41,7%according thterprises – 5

ople the mos

es betweeni and Rustustrial enterpemployment.nd flower gro

ment


01y. 2002y.

-0.7 -.6

w.-11.0m-14.0

-58.3-5.9

w-56.6m-75.8

-52.0-7.1

w-49.9m-65.1

upil’s wages

year. (betw

unt Curren3.5 l9.0 l2.5 l5.4 l7.5 l2.6 l4.6 l3.5 l5.9 l6.6 l4.2 l7.9 l8.1 l4.9 l4.9 l

ment of sta% was womahe following58,7%. Accost shares is o

100 and avi are theprises stand The main owing.


2003y.

20y.

w.-11.5 m-11.5

w11m13

w-57.7 m-76.3

w-56m74

w-51.0 m-67.5

w-50m64

are increas

ween employ

ncyariariariariariariariariariariariariariariari

atistics, 14 1an and 58,3

g: large enteording to kindon employee

125 inhabitae main mea idle or ceassub-sectors


004

2005y

.-1.8

m-3.4

w.12.6 m-16.8

-6.9

m-4.3

w-55.9 m-73.5

-0.2

m-4.3

w-48.8 m-61.2

ed.

yers)

113 people 3%- men. Terprises – 6ds of economes in manufa

ants per sans of empsed their opes of agricul


2006y.

200y.

w.-11.7 m-15.2

w.-12.m-13.

w-53.6 m-72.2

w-55.m-73.

w-47.4 m-61.2

w-48.m-63.

were emplThe total am8,5%; middmical activityacturing indu

square metployment prerations, agrture are ve

rvision ) Road

79

07 2008y.

6

9

w.-16.8 m-16.1

6

3

w-53.5 m-73.4

1

1

w-44.9 m-61.1

oyed in mount of

le-sized y, in the ustry.

er. The rovision. riculture

egetable

133. Sinfrast70% oset sc“on pothe citchemi100% Througcarriedbeen rsystemTbilisi MunicdiffereWastein comtreatmmanag Rusta134. Rwhich water Water providmajoriis faciKura wRustav“Rustafirst tim502 GSome service2011 aSida fu Garda135. Gwith “Ggroup,Gardawater in r. KMunicinfrast Trans Tbilis136. TTbilisi

Sewage andtructure is veof the city is hedule. The

otable water”ty's water scal-bacterioresponsible

ghout 2005-d out on thereplaced, whm and, accowas replace

ipal waste ment districts e collection impliance withment of hazagement both

avi Rustavi pub

had been supply is fa

r and poweres water suty of the rehlitated with wwithout any tvi is supplieavgas” starteme in GeorgEL and 790 improveme

ed Rustavi a new landfiunding. Haz

abani Gardabani wGeorgian Wa, which pro

abani. The coflows into Gura.T. Gardaipal waste tructure, whi

sport

i Transport se

has always

LoMod

d drainage sery old and supplied wi

e city's water”. In terms o

supply complogical labor

e for the qua

- 2006 extree Tbilisi wathich has sig

ordingly, lossed.

managemenof Tbilisi onssue has drh EU requireardous was

h in Tbilisi an

blic utilities han unsolvedacilitated by ” and “Mtskupply and whabilitation wwater in almtreatment. ed with gased individuagia. At prese

GEL for legents occurrepurchased ll in complia

zardous wast

water supplyater and pow

ovides wateompany pro

Gardabani wabani is gasmanagemele waste dis

ervicing of ths characteri


systems areunsure. As th no interrur supply meef ensuring th

pany, Tbiltsqratories and lity of the cit

emely importter supply n

gnificantly deses of water

t has greatln the basis rastically impements wasste of variound entire Ge

have greatlyd problem i

“Rustavi Wheta Water”water relateworks in the

most uninterr

s by JSC “Rl meter insta

ent the town gal entities. ed in the smodern wa

ance with EUte managem

y is facilitatewer” and “Mr supply an

ovides for bowater treatme

ified and facnt is under

sposal is con

he populationized with th


e covered 10for the exis

uption, whileets the natiohe quality of qalkanali Ltd1 chemical

ty's water su

tant reconstnetwork. Theecreased ther. A total of 5

y improved of tender reproved, two s opened. Seus types. Itorgia remain

y improved n Rustavi o

Water”. The ” is the memd services town has a

rupted regim

Rustavgas”, allation and is entirely g

solid municipaste trucks aU standards ment in Rusta

ed by “RustaMtskheta Wand water reoth water supent plant andcilitated with rtaken by anducted on R

n is one of the diversity


00% in the sting situatioe 30% is supnal standard

f the water sd, which haslaboratory a

upply.

ruction and e majority oe number of59 km of the

recently. Presults, acquold landfills

everal compt should bens one of the

recently. Lof the 90s, hmentioned c

mber of the to 51 621

already beenme. Waste w

which was movement

gasified. The

pal waste mand both mwas openedavi and entir

avi Water”.Tter” is the m

elated servicpply and wad after mechnatural gas

a private coRustavi landf

the most sigof the trans


city. At the n in the wat

pplied with wds laid out inupply, it shos a monopo

are in operat

rehabilitatioof central waf emergencye network in

rivate compaired the reswere closed

panies obtaine noted thate acute prob

imited powehave been company alosame invessubscribers

n completed water is direc

establishedof the gas me cost of the

managemenmetal and pla

d in Rustavi re Georgia is

The mentionmember of thces to 3984

ater related shanical treat.

ompany, whfill.

gnificant indisport system


same time ter supply o

water accordn the law of Gould be notedoly in the setion. These l

on works havater pipeliney shut-downn various dis

anies which spective equd and a newned licensest hazardous

blems.

er and gas eliminated. ong with “Gtment groupin t. Rustaand the po

ctly discharg

d in 1996. meters in ene used gas i

nt. Companyastic containthrough EB

s still a prob

ned companhe same inve4 subscribeservices. Thtment is disc

ich has res

cators of urbm.Tbilisi me

rvision ) Road

80

current f Tbilisi,

ding to a Georgia d that in ector, 3 labs are

ve been es have s of the

stricts of

service uipment. w landfill s for the s waste

supply, Rustavi

Georgian p, which avi. The pulation ged in r.

In 2006 ntrances s 1m3 –

y which ners. In RD and lem.

ny along estment

ers in t. e waste charged

spective

ban life. etro has

offerednumbemetro Autobunits autobumovabTaxi - only pfrom TTbilisi:linked Georg Rusta 137. TmicrobGeorgRustavTetris.the rou LTD owns “Pazik Garda138. Tautomare: mto Tbil Health Tbilis 139. Pand hospitTable Table NumbIndepedispenNumbNumbIndepedispen At prethe ceprogra

8 Large 9 Route10 The AGeogra

d services er of passencan only beus along wiof M38 cateuses is 110 ble units. in Tbilisi as

public transpTbilisi to Po: Avtchala, with all reg

gia with Turk

avi

The kinds ofbuses and tgia electronivi. The trav. The fees oute you take“Rustavi Mu33 buses, a

k” – 1 unit.

abani Transport in

mobile and ramunicipal tra

isi and Rust

hcare

i

Polyclinics, d

als (inpatien5.12 provide5.12 Healther of hospitaendent womnsaries 117 er of parameer of hospitaendent womnsaries 117

esent, nearlyentres of tubams in heal

and medium l

e taxis Academy of Scaphy, Tbilisi Pr

LoMod

to many pangers was abe paid via digith metro haegory of auand medium

well as in aport in the caoti arrived oDidube, Na

gions of Geokey in the ne

f transport mtaxes. Roadc boards, welling fee by

of Rustavi-Tbe. Travelling unicipal Autoamong them

nfrastructure ailway highwnsport (autotavi through

dispensaries

nt healthcarees data of thh Care Facilals 78

man consulta

edical persoals 78

man consulta

y all health cerculosis, inthcare syste

oad autobuses

ciences of Georess, Soviet Ge


assengers sbout 206 000gital travel caas remainedutobuses mom load autob

any other cityapital which n 10th Octo

avtlughi and orgia and Aarest future.

moving on ind signs and which reflecy bus is 20 bilisi microbby taxi costsotransportat: makes “Bo

of Gardabaways is preseobus), privatprivate route

, health cent

e) make up the healthcarelities in Tbil

tions, clinics

onnel 7079

tions, clinics

care providenfectious diseem for spec

rgian SSR, ecoorgia, 1989


since its op0 daily. Sincard. d one of theoves in the buses – 366

y, taxi is the can be use

ober, 187210

Tbilisi CenArmenia, Aze.

ntercity routtraffic light

ct the schedTetris. The

uses range s 1 km – 60 tion Companogdan”, “i-va

ani district ient here. The route micre micro-auto

ters, women

the core of the system in lisi

Nums and Num

100 Num

s and Num100

ers are privaease and mcified diseas

onomic-geogra


ening. Accoce 1st Octobe

e main muncapital dai

6 units. M29

fastest aboved 24 hours . At presen

ntral Stationerbaijan and

ts are: munits are providdule of bus

e travelling bfrom 1.30 toTetris. ny” is in ch

an”, 18 units

is well devee types of trro-buses anobuses.

n consultatio

he primary hTbilisi.

mber of hospmber of phys98

mber of hospmber of phys98

ate actors, inental hospitases covered

aphic research o


ording to 20er, 2010 the

icipal transply. The numcategory au

ve ground tra day. Railwt there five . The railwad Russia. R

cipal transpded to regus movemenby microbuso 1.50 GEL

harge of mu, “Dafi” mak

eloped. Broaransport on id taxi. Gard

on clinics, do

healthcare in

pital beds 40sicians (exclu

pital beds 40sicians (exclu

ndependent al. There are

d from the p

of VakhushtiB


009-2011 datravel cost i

ports. 476 mmber of largutobuses hav

ransport. Taway – the firailway sta

ay of the caRailway will c

port (buses),ulate traffic. t were instes in the ciin accordan

unicipal transke- 8, and so

ad network internal town

dabani is con

octor ambula

n Tbilisi.

078 uding dentis

078 uding dentis

of the statee also varioupublic funds

Bagrationi Instit

rvision ) Road

81

ata, the n Tbilisi

movable ge load ve 2128

xi is the rst train

ations in apital is connect

private First in alled in ty is 50

nce with

sport. It o called

of both n routes nnected

atories

sts)

sts)

e except us state s. Much

tute of

hospitMandaabandthe mcoverapaid fron theinsuramany main approp Rusta 140. IFrom Jas amCentrewas cresearprivate Garda141. TchildreGugunfollowi Local mediafree hebeen mothe Educ Tbilis142. TdirectiAccordrecordeducaimportestablMoreoproces Table SectorNumb

11Natiohttp://w12Sourc

al stock haatory social doned in 200

main mechanage for housrom the publeir own initiaance coverag

people cansource of fupriate medic

avi

n Rustavi oJuly, in the N

mbulatory ane, and anti-tucreated to prch. In addie offices.

abani The followinen’s polyclinnashvili denting large vill self-govern

ation servicesealth examingranted. De

ers, vulnerab

ation

i The legislations have beding to 200

ded in Tbiliational institutant for theishment of t

over, respecss.

5.13 Highe

r er of

onal Healthcawww.moh.govce: Departme

LoMod

s been soldhealth insu

0711. Private nism for theseholds livinglic funds but

ative. There age, howevernot afford punding for t

cal services f

perates threNew – Psycnd hospital uberculosis prevent bretion, there a

g function wnic, Gardabatal cabinet aages and vilment of Russ and other nations and emonstrationble families.

ve base of een identified06 situation si, of whic

utions. The ie effective the workforcctive structu

r Education

higher e

re System An

v.ge/ ent of Statistic


d to the privurance, intro

health insue pre-paymeg below povt all other indare a number as unemploaing ensurathe health sfor much of

ee inpatient ho-neurologservices wehealth centeast cancer are a numb

within Gardaani district inand therapeullages: Kesastavi with Rehealth facilitvarious kind

ns have alre

the educatid and public15 elemen

h 2 are senvolvement use of the

ce with qualitures of the

n Institution

2education 1

nalysis Repor

cs of the Minis


vate investooduced in 1rance is beient of healtverty line anddividuals areer of privateoyment is hiance premiusystem in Gthe populati

hospital, fivgical clinic, were provideders. It also o

and womeber of diagn

abani municnfectious houtic cabinet.

alo, Sarthitchegional hospties supporteds of expenseady been u

ion has grec involvemenntary profeself financedof the localmentioned

ty profession local auth

ns Function

2002/2003105

rt 2001-2007,

stry of the Eco


ors for rede995, which ng promotedth services d teachers oe expected toe companiesgh and averms30. Out-o

Georgia. Thion.

ve outpatientwhich patientd. Also in t

operates a naen age 40 nostic cente

cipality: newospital, Gard. Doctors’ amhala, Norio, Npital of Garded by a num

sive medicineused interna

atly improvent increased sional educ

d. State funl authorities d potential. nal skills on

horities shou

ning in Tbilis

2003/2004102

Ministry of H

onomic Deve


evelopment aproved to

d by the curin Georgia.

of the public o purchase i in the counrage househof-pocket pais situation

t clinics, andts with menttown is the ational skrinand over isrs, medical,

w Samgori ddabani matembulatories Nazarlo, Madabani , Tbilimber of medies and othe

ally moved in

ed in Georgin the educa

cational instnds 8 secointo the socThe dialogthe labor m

uld coordina

si in 2002-2

2004/20116

ealth. 2009.

lopment of G


and modernbe ineffectivrent governm. Private insschools of T

insurance contry offering holds incomeayments remreduces ac

d maternity tal problemsBlood Tran

ing – Centes free mam dental clin

octors’ ambrnity hospitaalso functio

artkopi and Kisi City Hospical action, tr commoditiendividuals, f

gia recently, ational proceitutions hav

ondary profecial dialoguegue should

market of the ate the me

200612

005 2005106

eorgia

rvision ) Road

82

nization. ve, was ment as surance Tbilisi is overage medical e is low, main the ccess to

homes. s as well nsfusion r, which

mmology nics and

bulatory, al, Davit on in the Kumisi. pital # 5, to which es have families’

priority ess. ve been essional e is very

aim at capital.

entioned

/2006

institutState sNon-s

Rusta143. 2qualificpupils 2011).As regand nofrom thGarda53 pufunctio 5.3 Ex 5.3.1. 144. TimpacimprovpotentpopulaAt precomplthe intsafety (by mostreamThe Pworks importthe locand se 5.3.2. 145. Inas it wlocal pImpactempoMitigathe eq Impacnidi of Mitigaor susof the worksImpactraffic.Mitigaunder

tions sector tate sector

avi 26 public schcation centewas 19 984

. gards pre-scon-commerche local budabani ublic schoolson within Ga

xpected soc

General soThe proposet of the rovement of ttial of Georgation living aesent, the tex is Rustavternational s of the transodernized m

ms, which wiProject is pa

or studies tant positivecal populatioervices. This

Construction a short terwill create epopulation). ct. Negativeoral, insignification. Dust cquipment; wo

ct. Secondarf infection (eation. Permaspending the

veterinary .

ct. Dangerou

ation. Consthe project,

LoMod

hools,20 privers and up to4 for the beg

chool institucial legal endget.

s,2 secondaardabani mun

cial impact o

ocial impacted Project haoad reconstraffic safetygia. The impalong the roaraffic safetyvi-Ponichalastandards. Tsit cargo stre

mains from Rll presumabrticularly impin Tbilisi. T

social resulon in the sos includes be

on-related srm perspectmployment The resettle

e impact cacant and concontrol by working by da

ry biological.g. unregisteanent monitoe constructiodepartment

us traffic co

ideration of including illu


19

vate schoolso 10 private ginning of th

tions, the lentity “Associa

ary professinicipality.

of the Proje

t of the Projas short andstruction Proy and trafficpact will be ad. y level alonga section). TThe Project eams from A

Rustavi to Tbly travel throportant for tThe possibilt for this soc

ocial-econometter prospec

social impative, the Projprospects (a

ement impacaused by cntrollable thr

watering; usiny.

l pollution (eered anthraxoring during

on works in cand using

onditions wit

proper preumination, a


1590

s, 1 higher edcolleges fun

he 2010/201

egal status oation of Kind

onal institut

ect

ject d long-term ioject shoul

c conditions significant n

g Tbilisi-Ruhe Project gguarantees

Azerbaijan. bilisi detour aough Tbilisi. the populatiolity of safe,cial group. I

mic system acts of receiv

acts ject will brinapproximate

cts are descrconstruction rough using ng at least 2

e.g. anthrax)x pits).

the ground case of a pitveterinary s

h overlappin

eventive meand instructin


1587

ducational innction in Rus1 study year

of Rustavi kdergartens”

tions and 1

impacts on td be consin big citie

not only for

stavi road iguarantees ts the internaThe Project and then, by

on of the cit, rapid and mproved roaand better aving timely m

ng a certain ely 100 newribed in Sect

disturbancgood constr

2 tanks; nois

) caused by

clearance at discovery. sterilization m

ng traffic flo

asures and ng the driver


15 101

nstitution, 3 stavi at preser (according

kindergartenwas establi

higher edu

the local posidered withes (Tbilisi, R

the whole c

is not satisfthe traffic saational-level is importan

y the detour)

ty of Rustavcomfortable

ads ensure access to themedical aid.

benefit for thw jobs will betion 5.3. e (dust, emruction practse control, in

the ground

and excavatiNotification measures b

ows with the

safety signrs.


1393

state profesent,. The nu to data of 5

s changed shed. It is f

ucational in

pulation. Thhin the conRustavi) andcountry, but

factory (parafety consiste

road capacnt for cargo s) and passen

vi, whose gre travel wilbetter integre markets, s

he local pope generated

missions, notice. nstalling mu

works near

ion works. Sof the local

before renew

e existing tra

ns along the

rvision ) Road

83

ssion re-mber of

5th April,

in 2008 inanced

stitution

e social ntext of d transit t for the

rticularly ent with city and streams nger car

eat part l be an ration of supplies

pulation, d for the

oise) is

ufflers to

the soil

Stopping service

wing the

aditional

e roads

Impacthe imMitigaduringImpacpowerinfrastMitigapopulaand re 5.4Lan 146. Tsubmiassess At this131 Arelatedamouncommproducmajor petrol businecatego Severeseverilost laresideIt shopetrol of implosing their in Amongof famrefugemonthvulner The Lhousegroupsthe losaccordsevere

Princi

148. Thas dr

ct. Infrastrucpact, are tra

ation. Dislocg constructioct. Potentialr-supply soutructure, noisation. A buation and mueasonable co

nd Acquisit

The detailed tted to ADsment and o

s stage, it cAHs are affed to permannt 30 are legercial land ctive trees. Tstructures afilling statio

ess facilitiesory A and ne

ely affected ty of impacts

and parcels ential land anuld be notestations ove

pacts on oththeir jobs a

ncome.

gst the affecmily capableees from Abhs of subsistrable AHs ar

Land Acquiseholds, invens. Compensst assets. Ading to the ely affected

iples Adopt

To reconcilerafted this LA

LoMod

cture. The mansmission lcation and ren; full rehab conflict wit

urces, as wse disturbanuilding contust develop ompromises

tion and Re

ResettlemeB in 1 we

other field wo

can be sumected directlnent take of galizable and

plots. AcqThe main im

and some anns. 6 legal e

sAccording teeds the pre

householdss as nobodycannot be

nd houses. ed, that for er the wholeher businesare deemed

cted househe of workingbkhazia are tence minimre identified

ition and Rentory of los

sation and reAll the affect

Georgian households

ted for the P

e the gaps bARF for the


major elemeines, water-sehabilitation

bilitation in cath the local

well as othence, conflictsractor musta communic

s.

esettlement

ent Action Plek. The ceorks are com

marized, thaly and 33 a132 private

d 102 with fquisition of

mpact is relancillary facilitentities will sto the ADB

eparation of a

s have beeny is losing ag

considered Severity of large comp

e Georgia, thses is curreto be seve

olds 2 are hg. Both of th

deemed asum. No onefor section 3

esettlement ses, descripehabilitation ted householegislation will be prov

Project

between GeoProject, wh


nts of commsupply syste of the infraase of dama population r infrastruct

s with worket assign ancation plan. A

an is under ensus survempleted .

at this projeare the empe land plots full registratio

only 5 lanated to the loties will be dsuffer in term

B SPS 2009a Land Acqu

n identified. Igricultural la

as incomeimpact could

panies, like he loss of 1 ently specifirely affected

headed by thhem are ems vulnerable

e of affected 3 of the Proje

Plan (LARPption of socplan will be

olds will be and ADB Sided with the

orgia laws/rehich, after en


munal infrastems and irrigastructural elage.

because oture, impactrs, etc. n officer toAll conflicts

preparationeys, detailed

ct will affectployees losiwith total aron. No crop

nd plots is oss of structdestroyed, inms of busine9 this sub-puisition and R

In this case,nd used for generatingd be estimatLukoil, posspetrol statioed. Besidesd, as their fa

he women wmployees lose and will rAHs are un

ect.

P) will providial status aelaborated provided wiSPS 2009 e additional

egulations andorsement


tructure, whigation pipes lements; pe

of impact ont on the ac

communicmust be set

and the firsd measurem

t as minimung their jobrea of 9858s are cultivaassociated

tures and buncluding 1caess impactsproject is thResettlemen

, the land loagricultural asset. Nobted only bassessing expon is not sevs that, all oamilies lose

without supposing job. Threceive allownder the pov

de detailed and identificaupon completh the adeqrequirementallowances.

and ADB’s Sby the Gove


ch can comand channermanent mo

n water-supccess to gro

cate with thttled by nego

st draft LARPments, soci

m 164 housbs.Project im0 sqm. Ou

ated on the awith losses

usinesses. Inr washing st: permanentus classified

nt Plan (LAR

ss is not crineeds and tbody is losised on incompended netwver impact. Sof the 31em more than

ort of male mhese 2AHs wances equ

verty line. In

census of aation of vuletion of valu

quate compets. Vulnerab

SPS (2009),ernment, is s

rvision ) Road

84

e under els. onitoring

ply and ound or

he local otiations

P will be ological

seholds: mpact is t of this affected s of 54 n total 4 tation, 3 t loss of d as of

RP).

teria for thus the ng also

me loss. works of Severity ployees 10% of

member and 11

ual to 3 total 13

affected lnerable

uation of ensation ble and

, MDFG seen as

a tool settlerbusine LARF

149. BResettprincip

x

x

x

x x

x x x x

x

Eligib 150. A

x

x x x

151. Cday ofcut-offnoticeimplempay an Comp 152. Ewill inclosseslump s

x

for ensuringrs, and the ess losses, o

Principles

Based on ttlement in tples are dev

Land acqminimized where unaimproving consultatioand particivulnerablenon-titled Aof land comlegalizableprovision othe LARP wpayment ocompletedcommenceestablishmoccurs.

bility

APs entitled fAll APs lowithout legTenants anOwners of APs losing

Compensatiof the beginnif date will no, requestedmentation. Tny fine or su

pensation E

Entitlement pclude proviss, a relocatiosums. These

Agriculturaplots of thecash free oon the rep

LoMod

g compensaprovision of

or may be se

and Entitle

the Georgiathe ADB Poeloped for th

uisition, anexploring al

avoidable, aor at least re

on with APs pation of AP and severeAPs (informmpensation e APs will beof income rewill be disclo

of compensa prior to the

ement of anyment of appr

for compensaosing land egal status; nd sharecrobuildings, c

g business, i

on eligibility wing of the APot be eligibled to vacateTheir dismanffer any san

ntitlements

provisions foions for perm

on subsidy, ae entitlemenal land impa

e same value of transactionproduction co


ation at replaf subsidies everely affec

ements adop

an laws on olicy Safeguhis MFF whi

d other invll viable alter

a time-boundegaining theon compen

Ps in planninely affected Aal dwellers oand will be f

e legalized astoration anosed to the Aation, resettle contractor y constructioropriate griev

ation or at leaeither covere

ppers whethcrops, plantsncome, and

will be limiteP Census ane for compene premises ntled structuction.

s

or APs losingmanent or teand a businets are detailacts will be cof the land lo

n costs at curost of the aff


acement cosor allowanc

cted.

pted for this

land acquards Statemch are as fo

voluntary rernative projed LARP will eir pre-progransation, discng and impleAPs will be por squattersfully compennd fully comd rehabilitatAPs in the lolement assistaking phys

on activities vance redre

ast rehabilitaed by legal

her registere, or other obsalaries.

ed by a cut-ond DMS. APnsation. The

and dismares materia

g land, houseemporary laness losses aed below:

compensatedost and at locrrent market ffected land.


st of all itemces for AFs

s MFF

isition and ment (2009),llows:

esettlement ect designs;

be prepaream standardclosure of reementing subprovided spes) will receivnsated for los

mpensated foion to all AP

ocal languagstance and ical acquisiton a particu

ess mechan

ation provisiotitle/traditio

ed or not; bjects attach

off date to bePs who settleey, however antle affectels will not b

es, and incond losses, buallowance ba

d at replacemcation acceprates or (if noThe cash a


ms, the rehabthat may b

the provisio, core involu

impacts w

ed and APs d of living; esettlement b-projects wecial assistane a livelihoosses other t

or land lossePs; ge; rehabilitatio

tion of the lalar packageisms to solv

ns under theonal land rig

ed to the lan

e set for eace in the affewill be givened structuree confiscate

ome and rehuildings lossased on tax

ment value eithtable to APs o land marke

at market rat


bilitation of ibe relocated

ons on invountary reset

will be avo

will be ass

information ill be ensurence; od allowancehan land; s;

n measuresand and prio; and ve APs griev

e Project are:ghts, legaliza

nd; and

ch subprojeccted areas an sufficient aes prior to ed and they

abilitation suses, crops andeclarations

her with replawhere feasib

ets are activetes option ha

rvision ) Road

85

informal d, suffer

oluntary ttlement

ided or

sisted in

to APs, ed;

e in lieu

s will be or to the

vance if

: able, or

ct on the after the advance

project will not

ubsidies nd trees s and/or

acement ble, or in e) based as been

x

x

x

x x

x

x

x

x

x

5.5SO5.5.1 TbilisFeudaroutesPersia

selected foleaseholdethe market income, thesubsistencebe legalizedself-relocatioaffected secbe compensNon agricureplacemenacceptable The cash areceive a 3with a 1 timThis allowaupdated bLARP appHouses, bdiscomfort irrespectivereplacemenAll relevantthe affectedCrops: Cadefault irresCrop compsharecroppTrees: CasBusinesseincome basincome. Teperiod baseAffected binterruptionRelocationcover transVulnerableelder headesubsistenceto be calcindicated bSevere Imincome willbased on National SCommunitsatisfy their

OCIO-CULTHistorical C

i al Georgia as. Through ta, Byzantium

LoMod

or the Progrars and sharet value of a ye APs will bee income. Trad and paid ason allowancections of a plosated. ultural land nt rate either to APs whe

at market rate3 months rentme self relocaance is to bebenchmarksroval

buildings, ancaused by ro

e of the spent cost free ot APs are entd item. ash compensspective of wpensation wiping agreemesh compensaes: If businessed on tax deemporary bused on tax dec

business won up to a maxn allowancesport costs ane Peoples Aed householde income andculated baseby the Nationpacts Allowl receive a 3 a 5 peopletatistics Offity Structurer pre-project f

TURAL ENContext

and generallthese routes

m, etc. Acco


am. When >ecroppers) wyear’s gross e paid additioansaction taxes titled owne

es in cash equot that becom

(Residentiawith replacere feasible, oes option hast allowance.

ation allowance to be calcs indicated b

nd structureoad traffic,theecific degreeof deductionstitled to this p

sation at currwhether the cill be paid bents. ation at markess is lost permeclaration or,siness lossesclaration or, iforkers/emploximum of 3 m: APs forced

nd living expeAllowance: Vds) will be gid priority in eed on a 5 pnal Statistics

wance; APs lomonths seve

e family andce of Georg

es and Publifunctions.

VIRONME

ly entire Tras Georgia cording to fo


10% of an Aill get an addyield of the

onal compenses/fees will bers. Non-legalual to 1 year omes inaccess

al/commerciaement plots oor in cash at s been selectNon-titled/noce in cash eqculated baseby the Natio

es. In order tese items wille of impact. s for depreciaprovision by d

rent market racrops were aboth to lando

et rate basedmanently it w, if unavailabs will be comf unavailableoyees: Indem

months. d to relocate enses for 3 mVulnerable peven an allow

employment ipeople famis Office of Gosing >10% oere impacts

d the monthia at time of ic Utilities: W

NT

ans-Caucasuconnected toreign and G


AP agriculturditional allowaland lost. In

sation correse paid by the izable APs wof minimum sible or unviab

al land). Legof same value

current markted for the Pron-legalizablequal to 1 yeaed on a 5 ponal Statistic

to address pol be compensCompensat

ation, transacdefault irresp

ates for the glready harveowners and

d on type, agewill be compele, based on pensated in c, official minim

mnity for lost

will receive months. eople (APs b

wance correspin project-relaly and the

Georgia at timof agriculturaallowance.Th

hly-updated f LARP approWill be fully r

us was covo such distaGeorgian his


ral land is afance for sevcase of sev

sponding to 3EA or waived

will be compesubsistence inble to use afte

gal settlerswile as plots affeket rates, freerogram. Rente land users ar of minimumpeople familycs Office of

otential damasated in full fion will be ction costs orpective of the

gross value oested or not a

tenants bas

e and producensated in ca

the official mcash for the mum subsistwages for th

a relocation

below povertponding to 3ated jobs. Thmonthly-upd

me of LARP al land or >10his allowance benchmarkoval replaced or r

ered with gant countriestorical sour


ffected, AP (vere impacts vere impact o3 months of md. Legalizableensated with oncome. Resider acquisition

ll be compenected and at e of transactiters/leaseholwill be comp

m subsistencey and the mGeorgia at

ages of vibrafor the whole provided in r salvaged mregistration s

of 1 year’s haat the time ofsed on their

ctivity of treesash equal to aminimum subbusiness inteence income

he period of b

subsidy suff

ty line and w months of m

he allowancedated bencapproval

0% of non-age is to be caks indicated

rehabilitated

reat many ces as Arabiarces, the ca

rvision ) Road

86

(owners, equal to on other minimum e APs will one time dual non-

will also

nsated at location

ion cost. lders will

pensated e income. monthly-

time of

ations or building cash at

materials. status of

arvest by f impact. specific

s. a 1-year sistence erruption e. business

ficient to

widow or minimum e is to be chmarks

ricultural lculated by the

so as to

caravan a, India, apital of

Georgdevelodiffere(MeidaGate),The clocatehundrepeaceravagiKhazapeopleAs a rpopulaUp to The stresult m thicwater burnt materiOld dic. a bKala, mountcity of The achangto thesAccordeconomarkerelatiohouseconstrVakhtaall natconfesSimilabuilt alegendchurchchurchJerusadominThe aEuropin 173 Town- The toTown-GeorgdeveloBostanfact th

gia – Tbilisi oped centersent directionani Gate), G, Soghdebilisapital of Ged on the ced years is

eful life, inteng and plu

ars, Arabs, Me have manaresult of archated since fa250 archeotratigraphic of archeolog

ck cultural lapipeline, ceceramics, pial. stricts of Tbridge (near Narikala, Detain and its searly and d

above detered until XIXse days. Latding to fore

omically stronets and squaonships. Deves, bathes, ruction of wang Gorgasationalities anssions prese

ar to the old according to d: Sioni – Vh, later calleh, which hasalem. The sant of Tbilis

appearance ean traveler

35.

-Fortress R

own-fortress -fortress Rusgia. Rustaviopment of thn-Kalaki (in hat construc

LoMod

was a juncts of the old s had resu

Ganjis Kari s Kari (Sogheorgia – Tbirossroads oclosely link

ensive constundering andMongols, Turaged to presheological reairly early pelogical monulayers of V-gical excavaayer compriseramic and precious sto

ilisi are locaMetekhi) waeda-Tsikhe slope of the eveloped fe

rmined the X c. The initiater Tbilisi greeign and Gng and faciliares had bevelopment winns, carav

which, accorali (452-502nd religions erved till now

capital of Kthe names oirgin Mary’s ed Petkhains connotatiosymbolic icoi today – Mtaof Tbilisi of rs (Turnifor,

Rustavi

is located wstavi, the ce had be t

he feudal epoPersian Vos

ction of a ch


tion of tradeworld and

lted in man(Ganja Gat

hdebil’s Gatelisi is one o

of the east ked with thetruction andd lengthy prk-Selchukiaserve it as a esearch it haeriods (V-IV uments of dXIX c.c. urb

ations of terrsed remnantother crafts

one, glass, g

ated in the soas built ove(Mother-Forright bank.

udal ages. structure of

al appearancew towards aGeorgian his

tated with coeen well dewas diverse

vanserais, arding to the ). Tbilisi hasfelt well in t

w. Kartli – Mtskof the monachurch, Go

n, Tabor –ns with the on of Aton atsminda. the late feChardin) an

within the parenter of histthe royal doch, which istan means hannel from


e caravan rocultural real

ny gates of te), Mtsire Ke). of the oldest

and west. e history of d cultural floperiods of fans and mancapital of a as been discmillennia B.

different perioban life of Tbitory adjacents of househmanship remgold and sil

outhern partr the narrowrtress) etc. The citadel

f the city oce and planand against storical souonveniences

eveloped. It e as well –and café-sho

tradition, iss been multi-the city, whi

kheta, the masteries of tholgotha – St.

Transfigurachurch builtmountain,

udal age hand city plan a

rk of culture torical provindomain thros confirmed royal court,r. Kura in


outes in thelm also wen

the fortificaKari (Small

t and most Its history Georgian p

ourishing asforeign suprny more battstrong unitecovered that.C.) up to anods have bebilisi have bent to the garhold and resmnants, implver jewelry,

t of the townwest part of in different had been th

of the periodning structuthe river flowrces, Tbilisis in the middwas a larg

– royal and ops and of s assigned -national citych is confirm

majority of thhe Holy Land. Cross churtion church t on the tomyet another

as been preand descript

and recreatnce Kukhetioughout the

by the ancie, while Kalakthe area is


middle agent through thation of TbiGate), Rab

picturesquecomprising eople. The s well as coremacy. Petled for Tbilis

ed Georgian t all districts

nd including een discoveeen most clrden close tosidential builported and l, local and

n near hot sur. Kura, whtimes) was

he architectu

d, which hare have beew outside Tii was a tydle ages. Trae center of aristocrats

f course – to the foun

y since anciemed by cult

he first churcd of Palestinrch, Bethleh

and Metekb of the Virg

r holy place

eserved in stion drawn b

tion of mode, is one of t

e entire poent name ofki is town inassigned to


es. The roadhe city. Roalisi – Meida

badis Kari (R

e cities in thone thousacity has witountless invrsians, Byzasi and yet Gstate.

s of Tbilisi hathe late feudred in Tbilisearly reveal

o Erekle II sqlding of thatlocal burnt aforeign num

ulphur watehile a citadel

constructedural dominan

ad not signen preservedflis and Kalapical feudalade, craftsmf internationa’ palaces, cfirst church

nder of Tbilent times. Peconstruction

ches of Tbilne, accordinhem – Virginkhi – Virgin gin in Gethse, is the pro

sketches by by Prince Va

ern t. Rustavthe oldest tolitical-adminf the town-fon Georgian) o King Trda

rvision ) Road

87

d of the ds from ani Kari Rabad’s

he world and five tnessed vasions, antines,

Georgian

ad been dal age.

si so far. ed as a quare; 8 t period, and un-

mismatic

rs. In IV l (called

d on the nt of the

nificantly d almost a. l city –

manship, al trade citizens’

hes, the isi King eople of ns of all

isi were g to the

n Mary’s Mary’s

semane, ominent

XVII c. akhushti

vi. owns of istrative

ortress – and the

at in the

seconhead, AccordRustavGeorgthe towArcheoArcheoAs a rand ecand deearly adiscovIntensforeignexcavaThe deproximHereti Accordand paroad dRustavKartli reviva 5.5.2 It shouroad oTbilisi Shindspreserof settdiscovAs regliteratureceivand Tthem, subjecarcheo6. Alt 163. Nsectiotraffic internaearly s 164. Tof the road) presendeveloroad i

d half of IV start). In V cding to writtevi had be o

gia. In 1265 twn transformological resological excesult of excaconomic bueveloped mand developvered as welsive urban lifn coins (froations of theevelopment

mity to two roads. ding to Arabassed througdivided into svi was built and of courls of the city

Cultural H

uld be notedof Tbilisi-Rus

crossed m.si. Remnantrved till now tlements an

vered on m. gards the18ure does noted verbal inbilisi districtsthe areas o

ct to speciaological itemernatives a

No-project vn of Red Brsafety will

ational transstage of the

The main alteroute of theis being devnted under toped for Ponis being wi

LoMod

c. Due to thc. Vakhtang en sources aone of the mthe town wa

med into a smsearch of avations havavations remildings with iddle ages (ped middle ll. fe and close om Kupuri, Be remnants o

of Rustavi isignificant c

b and Persiagh towns of several direcin the area

rse the enemy.

eritage in P

d that the abstavi at all. . Iaghluja slts of route and researc

nd burial moIaghluja as w km project contain indformation fros during varof the main al research ms in the areaanalyses

variant mearidge-Tbilisi

be maintasit potential project deve

ernatives of e section aloveloped as the IEE spenichala-Rustdened alon


he channel tGorgasali fo

and archeolomost significs plunderedmaller size vRustavi cl

ve been undmnants of for

communica(IV-VIII, IX-Xages; burial

economic liByzantium, of fortress annto an urbacaravan rou

an geographRustavi, Ga

ctions. , which coumies invade

Project Area

bove describAccording toope towardshave been

chers have nounds datingwell.

ct section ofdications towom the archrious construand alternauntil now. a.

ans the conconnection

ained what of the coun

elopment.

Rustavi-Tbiong Ponichaan individuacially develotavi Section g the given


he town wasounded bishogical data,

cant political by the Gold

village. learly reveadertaken sincrtification str

ations and hX and XII-XIl mounds of

nk with the Khorezm, D

nd town. n center of t

utes – Tbilis

hers, Tbilisi-ardabani, Kh

ld not be aved it first too

a

bed historicao the writtens Kumisi lakarcheologic

no doubts thg back to an

f Tbilisi-Rustwards any cu

eologists, wuction worksative alignmeThey have

nservation oroad, in pawill accord

ntry. Thus, N

ilisi speedwala settlemen

al project anoped for this3 as part of

n section a


s called “Ruop cathedrasince IV-V c

l, religious aden Horde K

aled its coce the 40s oructures, gatigh quality cII c.c.) havef late bronze

remaining wDaruband, e

the middle asi-Bardavi a

-Bardavi tradhunani, Sham

voided if oneo. Excavatio

al route doen sources, tke, then entcal confirmehat it is the trntiquity and

tavi road to ultural monumwho are surves. Accordingent and adjanot heard

of the poor articular, insuingly hamp

No-project v

ay project arnt. The givennd the relevas sub-projecf Rustavi-Tbnd no alter


us Tavi” (Ru a in Rustavi. c.c. till the sand trade-ec

Khan Berqa,

omplex anof the past cetes, palacesconsumptione been founde age and a

world is proveetc.) discove

ages was greand Souther

de road follomkori, Ganja

e was travens confirm

s not coincidthe old routetered Tbilisi

ed on m. Iagrace of the o

early midd

be reviewements withineying remna

g to the inforacent territoabout accid

situation aufficient roa

per the full ariant was i

re associaten sub-projecant alternativct. However,bilisi highwayrnative route


is a stream

econd half oconomic ceas a result o

d difficult entury. , bathes, resn items of thd; burial moantiquity hav

ed by Georgered as a r

eatly favoredrn Georgia-K

owed r. Kuraa. From Bard

lling to the numerous fa

de with the e – from Ru

from Tabakghluja, it ha

old route. Rele ages hav

ed; special sn the sectionants of Rustarmation provories have ndental disco

long Tbilisi-d capacity aapplication

ignored righ

ed with the sct (2nd sectioves analysis, the preseny only. The es are cons

rvision ) Road

88

m, Tavi –

of XIII c. nters of of which

history.

sidential he early ounds of ve been

gian and result of

d by the Kakheti-

a gorge davi the

heart of alls and

modern ustavi to khmela-as been emnants ve been

scientific n. I have avi town vided by ot been

overy of

-Rustavi and low

of the ht at the

election n of the

s will be nt IEE is existing sidered.

Howevcomm As it isin a naChurcand fu Techncharacresettleither roads 166. Tthe nanormsadditio The o(asphalifetimethe rigresult the coIEE anthe tec

13Howechoice wwithin tof rigid

ver, due to tent below o

s seen fromarrow corridoh (left hand)

urther betwee

nically, any scteristics of ement impacoinciding wand therefo

The project iatural enviros and rules onal principa

other alternaalt – concree of the rigidgid concreteof such a c

onstruction cnd obtain thechnical regu

ever, for Tbilisiwas not the rigthe Tbilisi City

d pavement of t

LoMod

the concernsn this issue

the aerial por between ) and dense en the privat

shifting of thethe road (c

acts (privatewith the exisre are prede

is not realizeonment is eare observe

al alternative

atives discusete) pavemed pavement e-cement pachoice is thecompany dece environmelations shou

i – Phonichala

gid bituminous y and often neethe road.


s expressedin more deta

photos (fig. 6the patchesnetwork of

te land plots

e road from curves) and e land plotssting interchetermined.

ed in a sensexpected. Thed, will be wes for any en

ssed were tent.The pave

is higher. Favement hase increased cides to use

ental permit tuld be met.

section (sectioconcrete cove

ed of maintenan


d during the ails.

6.1- Fig. 6.4 of Krtsanisiprivate land

s located from

the existing increase e

s and structanges (reco

sitive environhe environm

within the nonvironmental

the pavemeement varia

For the sectios been accedemand for

e its own conto operate th

on 1) followingr, but asphalt cnce works on u


public consu

), along the i Forest-Parkplotson the

m both side

alignment wither ecologures). Loca

onstruction),

nment and nmental impaorm. Accordl reasons.

nt options: ants were coon 3 these aepted13. In tconcrete w

ncrete plant,he concrete

g the technical cover option haunderground ut


ultations by

section 3 ek owned by right side (kof the road.

will only worsgical impact tions for theor with the

no particularact level, proingly, there

rigid (concreonsidered aarguments wthe environm

within the lim, it will not hplant, howe

and exploitatioas been selectetilities, makes


different NG

xisting road Georgian O

km 10.5 – km

sen the geo(Krstanisi P

e interchangexisting sec

r harmful imovided the is no need

ete-cement)as alternativewere significmental resp

mits of the prhave to draft ver requirem

on consideratiod, as the road iimpossible app

rvision ) Road

89

GOs, we

passes Orthodox m 12.5),

metrical Park) or ges are condary

mpact on building for any

) or soft es. The

cant and ect, the roject. If its own

ments of

ons, the is located plication

IEE

Rep

Fi g or

t

g. 6

.1 L

ayouu

t of t

he ro

a

ad a

nd fa

cil iti

es b

uffe

r on

cada

straa

l map

s

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

ge anage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i BS

up

erv

isio

n

Bord

er)

Road

900

IEE

Rep

Fi

ort

ig. 6

.2 L

ayoou

t of t

he ro

ad a

nd fa

ci

litie

s bu

ffer o

n ca

dast

rral m

aps

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

geanage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i B

Su

pe

rvis

ion

Bord

er)

Road

911

IEE

Rep

Fi

ort

ig. 6

.3 L

ayoou

t of t

he ro

ad a

nd fa

ci

litie

s bu

ffer o

n ca

dast

rral m

aps

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

ge

anage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i BS

up

erv

isio

n

Bord

er)

Road

922

IEE

Rep

Fig or

t

g. 6

.4 L

ayouu

t of t

he ro

a

ad a

nd fa

cil iti

es b

uffe

r on

cada

straa

l map

s

LM

oLoan256

55

-GE

Ood

ern

iza

tion

of

TO:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi S

Pro

cure

me

nt,

CS

ect

ion

of

the

TbC

on

stru

ctio

n M

abili

si-R

ed

brid

geanage

ment

and

e (

Aze

rba

ijan

i B

Su

pe

rvis

ion

Bord

er)

Road

933

7. 7.1 S The panticipphaseincorp A Env Po

1 D(rnoarop

SsSsEulaG

2 DereredRPGIr

3 Lodissitmafueeq

4 Soanreemerre

ENVIRON

Summary of

project waspated impace the analysporated in the

vironmental

otential ImpDegradation relief, soil atural habitaf the rightdjacent to thoads, dumots).

Sensitive ecopecial impor

Sites of archignificance,

Existing humse – resid

and. Geohazard pDamage

lements aedesign roaelocation ofisruption of

Railway & exPower transmGas pipelinesrrigation cha

ocation of sposal sitestes, aggregaking faciliteling and

quipment yar

oil Erosion –nd permanetaining w

mbankmentsrosion engininstatement

LoMod

MENTAL IM

f Activities a

screened cts is provideis describese project des

l Impacts –

pact of natural l

cover, veats)in the cet-of-way (lahe highway ping sites,

osystems anrtance haeology an

an activitiesdential and

rone sites of infra

and the ad and/or f services aservices i.e.

xisting roadsmission liness, nnels

borrow pits, any asphagate and ties, workerstorage plards

– Design of tnt drainage

walls, berms, design eering measplans


MPACTS

and Anticip

for environed below ins how thesesign process

Design and

andscape egetation, ertain part nd strips – access

, borrow

nd sites of

nd cultural

s and land d farming

astructure need to plan for

and avoid ,

s,

ts, waste alt mixing

concrete rs camps, aces and

temporary systems,

ms and of anti-

sures and


pated Impac

nmental imp relation to

e potential ims.

d Pre-const

CommentsParticular s Resettlemeplanningof t

The highwasystems. Tinterchange Following relocated bex special cr

crossing Bx Relocatiox Relocatiox RelocatioDust/air pdegradationcareful chowater polluaquatic life location. Aconsultants the final chocontractor.Proper desiand secondincreased potential slo


cts

pacts and project pha

mpacts have

ruction Pha

ssensitivities i

nt issues wethe route

ay crosses sThe projectes

infrastructuefore startingrossing shouBP’s oil and

on of overheaon of gas-maon of optical fpollution, wn impacts onoice of sitetion, landsc- will depe

At the detahave propo

oice will be m

gn importandary impacts

sedimentatow deteriora


a summaryases. In the e been and

ase

identified du

ere most im

everal impot envisages

ure elemeg constructiould be organgas pipeline

ad power linain pipeline fibre cablewater pollun aquatic lifee location. cape degradend on careailed engineosed certainmade later b

nt to minimizs: landscapetion of wtion of the h


y of activiticase of thewill continu

uring design:

portant for o

rtant infrastrs construct

ents shouldon of the roanized at the es. es and subs

ution, lande - will depeDust/air podation impaeful choice eering stagn sites . Hoby the const

e potential ee degradatio

watercoursesighway pave

rvision ) Road

94

es and e design ue to be

optimal

ructure ion of

d be ad:. site of

station

dscape end on ollution, cts on of site e EIA wever, ruction

erosion on and s and ement.

5 Introde

6 Nonu

Enviro

x

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

terchanges ads and

esign

oise and uisance

onmental Im

x PoteWor

Destruction vegetation, right-of-way

Destruction vegetation, eaccess roadconstruction

Landslides, in road cuts Erosion stimtemporary sErosion of concentratedIncreased sby erosion afills and waincreased squality and fImpact of ecosystemshighway Soil and waoil, grease, constructionmixing sitesPoor sanitconstructionsanitation, wConstructionroadside litteAir pollutioconstructionhighway, nsettled rural Air pollution

Noise polluconstructionby the highwLocal noise.

LoMod

and interctheir plann

traffic

mpacts - C

ential Imparks

of natural laeco-systems,occupied by

of natural laeco-systems,ds, in the born camps and e

slumps, slipstriggered by

mulated from sedimentation

lands belowd outflow from

suspended seat constructioaste dumps. sedimentationfish breeding.

constructio of the rivers

ater contaminfuel and pain

n camps and e. tation and n camps anwaste managen wastes aer. on from vn in populatenotably metro

areas. Local n from any co

ution from n particularly iway, such as


onnecting ning and

emission

Constructio

acts During

andscape (re, habitats andthe highway.

andscape (re, habitats andrrow pit sitesequipment ya

s and other mthe constructfresh road cu

n of natural w the road m covered or ediment in ston sites and fReduced wan and impa. on activities

and streams

nation during nt in the RoWequipment ya

solid wastend work sitement) alongside th

vehicle opeed areas traopolitan areadust. ncrete batchi

vehicle opin populated

s densely sett


Interferencelocal accesNeed to deswith localDepartmentNoise & esignificant where residPhonichala-sites.

on Phase

Constructi

elief, soil covd wildlife) in t

elief, soil covd wildlife) on t, waste dum

ards.

ass movemetion activities.uts and fills adrainage wabed receiv

open drains.treams affectfresh road cuater quality aacts on wa

s on aquas crossed by t

construction W, access roadards and asph

e disposal tes (sewerag

he RoW a

rations duraversed by tas or dens

ng plants.

peration durareas traverstled rural are


e with local ss with incresign traffic cl authoritiet.emissions rproblem in dential prop-Rustavi se

ion Yes/No Severit

ver, the

Yes Minor

ver, the ps,

Yes Medium

nts

No

and ys. ing

Minor

ted uts, and ater

Yes Minor

atic the

Minor

by ds, halt

Yes Minor

in ge,

Yes Medium

and Yes Medium

ing the ely

Yes Minor

Yes Medium

ing sed as.

Yes minor


transportatieased trafficirculation plaes and

related to densely po

perties adjoction we d

o

y

Site

Road11.0 narroKrtsa(km.

m borrodumcampyardsconsNo e

Near

river12.5 crossseasMtkvriver11.0

Camwill Cons

m Camwill Cons

m Who

Anywvehicsettle

m SupplocatRust


on circulatioc safety proans in consuRegional

traffic is oopulated ar

oin the roado not have

Locations

d section fto km 17.0

ow stripanisiPark 11.0 – 12.0)

ow pit sitesps, conps and eqs to be de

struction contrexisting landsl

r embankmen

rs – r.Mtkvarinear the brid

sing the gullysonal stream evari river. rs – r.Mtkvari- km 17.0

mp sites and be selec

struction Con

mp sites and be selec

struction Conole allignment

where concles pass ements

plier contracttions tavi km 17.0 –

rvision ) Road

95

on and blems.

ultation Roads

only a reas & d. For

e such

from km

p of borders

s, waste nstruction quipment fined by ractor lides.

nts.

: km km dge y with entering

: km

quarries cted by tractor

quarries cted by tractor

nstruction through

tor’s site

– 17.8

13 14

15

16

17

18

19

Chara

Land cgrading

Constrcarriag

Poaching byCreation of vectors of water. Creapits, quarrieother diseasbiological mnear the pesHealth hazaraised and activities. Impacts on Aonly undiscissue Hazardous interferes wi Traffic disru Impact on overhead poconstruction

Accident ristransport, thdetonation o

acter of Mai

Activity

clearance ang in the RoW

ruction of thegeway; pave

LoMod

y constructiontemporary brdisease e.g.

ation of stagnes, etc. suitedse vectors. R

materials (e.g. st holes (i.e. nards by noisblown by v

Archaeologicaovered arche

driving conith pre- existin

ption during c

existing inower lines w

n site:

sks associatehat may resuof explosive lo

n of the An

nd W

Desland

EmiNois

GrowasGropollu

e new ement

Desland

Emi


n workers reeding habita. sunny, stanant water bod to mosquitecontaminatioAnthrax) dur

not registeredse, air emissvehicles durin

al Sites eological relic

ditions wherng roads.

construction a

frastructure: within the righ

ed with vehiclt in spills of oad, injuries o

ticipated Im

Imp

struction of ndscape, hab

issionsse, vibration

ound pollutioste generatioound and surution struction of ndscape, hab

issions


ats for mosqugnant pools odies in borro breeding aon by infectioring earth wod Anthrax sitesions and dng construct

cs could be

re construct

activities

Relocation ht of way of t

cular traffic atoxic materia

or loss of life

mpacts - C

pact

natural itats, erosion

n

n and/or on rface water



No uito

of row and ous rks s)

Yes Minor

ust ion

Yes Mediumminor

an Yes

ion Yes Minor High

of the

Mediumor High

and als,

Yes Minor

Constructio

dir

ec

t

Ind

ire

ct

n +

++

+

+

n

+


r. MtSmacreataligncouldborro

m Rust

Who

At inthe cthe erural Alon

m Wrelincropipco

Whoparti17.0

on Stage

Charact

Ind

ire

ct

Po

sit

ive

Neg

ati

ve

+

+ +

+ +

+ +

+


tkvari all puddles cted along th

nment; larged be createdow sites and q

tavi km 17.0 –

ole allignment

tereference zconstruction rexisting main roads

g the whole r

Whole allocation of o

nes, organizossings onpelines, relocommunicationole alignmecularly Rus– 17.8

ter of impac

Rev

ers

ible

Irre

ve

rsib

le

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

rvision ) Road

96

could be he whole er pools d at the quarries;

– 17.8

zones of oad with and

road

lignment: overhead ation of n BP’s cation of

n cables ent but tavi km

ct

Te

mp

ora

ry

Residual

+

+ +

+

+

+

Explorpits

Transpgravel,borrowsupply

Disposwastes

Disposwastes

ration of borr

portation of s, stones from

w pits. Matery.

sal of spoil as

sal of spoil as

LoMod

Nois

Growas

Gropollu

row DeslandEmiNois

GrowasGropollu

sand, m ial

DeslandEmi

Nois

GrowasGropollu

and DeslandEmiNois

GrowasGropollu

and Desland

Emi

Nois

Growas

Gropollu


se, vibration

ound pollutioste generatio

ound and surution struction of ndscape, habissionsse, vibration

ound pollutioste generatioound and surution struction of ndscape, habissions

se, vibration

ound pollutioste generatioound and surution

struction of ndscape, habissionsse, vibration

ound pollutioste generatioound and surution struction of ndscape, hab

issions

se, vibration

ound pollutioste generatio

ound and surution


n

n and/or on

rface water


n



n



n



n

n and/or on

rface water


+

+

+

n +

++

+

+

n

+

+

+

+

n

++

+

+

n +

+

+

+

+


+

+ +

+ +

+

+

+

+ +

+

+

+

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+

+

+

+ +

+ +


+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ + + +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

rvision ) Road

97

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

CEnvi # A

f

1 Nf

2 Wh

3 T

4 R

5 Sa

6 PI

AtiM'

7 Af

Chara

Act

Physicalinear i

ironmental

Air Pollutionfuture

Noise Pollutfuture.

Water qualityhighway surf

Traffic safety

Roadside litt

Soil and waalongside thPotential Ompacts

Accident ristransport, thnjuries or ManagemenPublic HealtAir Pollutionfuture

acter of Mai

ivity/Factor

al existencenstallation

LoMod

Impacts -

n from incre

tion from inc

y deterioratiofaces to wat

y problems

ter.

ater contamie highway

Operation

sks associathat may res

loss of lifnt' section), th and Safetn from incre

n of the An

r

of Destrulandsc

Emissi

Noise,

Grounwaste Grounpollutio


Operation

eased use

creased use

on with increter courses

nation by o

Phase Em

ted with veult in spills fe(see 'Hazinjuries or

ty section)eased use

ticipated Im

Impac

uction of natucape, habitat

ions

vibration

d pollution agenerationd and surfacon


ns Phase

of the high

e of the high

eased dust f

il, grease a

ergency R

ehicular traffof toxic ma

zardous Maloss of lif

of the high

mpacts - O

ct

ural ts, erosion

and/or

ce water


way in YeMiincg

hway in YeMiincg

from Yemi

Ye

YeMe

nd fuel YeMi

Related Ye Se

fic and aterials aterials fe (see

YeMe

way in YeMe

Operation S

Dir

ec

t

Ind

ire

ct

Pit

i

+


esnor creasin

Sit

esnor creasin

Whpakm

es nor

Whpakm

es Whpakm

esedium

thebe

esnor

Whalig

es/No

everity

Whalig

esedium

esedium

Cro Wh

Stage Character o

Po

sit

ive

Ne

ga

tiv

e

Re

ve

rsib

le


te Locations

hole alignmrticularly

m 17.0 – 17.8

hole alignmrticularly

m 17.0 – 17.8hole alignmrticularly

m 17.0 – 17.8e level of saf

impovedhole gnment hole gnment

ossed settle

hole RoW

of impact

Re

ve

rsib

le

Irre

ve

rsib

le

Te

mp

ora

ry

+

rvision ) Road

98

s

ment but Rustavi

8

ment but Rustavi

8 ment but

Rustavi 8fety will

ments

py

Re

sid

ua

l o

r lo

ng

-te

rm

+

Traffic

Mainte

Accide

7.2 Undersignificprojecactivitispecifanalys 7.2.1 The imamongthe roaand resumm Ambi

The hobserv

nance works

nts

Specific E

r the specificcant impact

ct impacts isies are descic for road sis.

Air Emiss

mpact relatedg the importad exploitatielevant mitigary of autom

ient Air Pol

hourly intenvation data

LoMod

Destrulandsc

Emissi

Noise,

Grounwaste

Grounpollutio

s DestrulandscEmissi

Noise,

Grounwaste GrounpollutioDestrulandscEmissi

Noise,

Grounwaste Grounpollutio

Environmen

c environmes character

s given in pcribed in p.projects and

ions Relate

d to the emistant issues ton is discus

gation measmobile emiss

lution from

nsity of train 2011 is


uction of natucape, habitat

ions

vibration

d pollution ageneration

d and surfacon uction of natucape, habitations

vibration

d pollution agenerationd and surfacon uction of natucape, habitations

vibration

d pollution agenerationd and surfacon

ntal Impacts

ental impactistic particul. 7.1 and m 7.3, here wd some of t

ed to Constr

ssions in thetypical to thessed in detaisures are desions analys

the IntensiCon

affic within s character


ural ts, erosion

and/or

ce water

ural ts, erosion

and/or

ce water

ural ts, erosion

and/or

ce water

s

ts reviewed larly for roa

more genericwe focus onthem require

ruction Act

e atmosphere road projels in Annex

escribed in is in terms o

ity of Trafficnecting Hig

Tbilisi-Rustized with th


+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

in this chapad projects. c impacts asn those parte not only q

ivities and

ric air and reects. The iss3. Constructparagraph 8

of current an

c within Rehghway

tavi highwahe below p


+

+

+ +

+ +

+

+

+

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

pter we meaWhile the o

ssociated wticular issuequalitative b

Operation o

elevant mitigsue of the etion-related 8.1.1.4. Belond forecasted

habilitation

ay rehabilitaparameters:


+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

+ +

an most typioverall summith the cons

es, which arut also qua

of Highway

gation measuemissions redust and em

ow, we gived traffic inten

of Tbilisi-R

ation accordcars - 507

rvision ) Road

99

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

ical and mary of struction re more ntitative

ures are elated to missions e a brief nsity.

Rustavi

ding to 7 units;

minibuthis daAccordcars - calcula Air qusubstathat stgraphi (Numb

uses - 201 uata [1] are giding to 2016724 units; m

ated from th

ality modeliances withintandards areical and tabl

bers imply m

LoMod

units; autobuiven in the fo6 estimatesminibuses - is data [1] a

ng was comn 1000 m see not exceede data of the

maximum pe


uses - 21 unorm of a tabl, intensity o286 units; are given in t

mpleted on tection (calcuded in contrese results a

rmissible co


nits and trucle in Append

of traffic wasautobuses -he form of a

he basis of lation step –

rol points (neare given be

ncentration


cks - 18 unidix #1. s assessed 30 units an

a table in App

calculated d– 25 m). Theearest popu

elow.

shares).


its; dispersio

with the fold trucks - 25pendix #2.

dispersion de analysis olated areas


ons calculat

lowing para5 units; disp

data [2] for pof the results– 7 points)

rvision ) Road

100

ed from

ameters: persions

pollutant s shows and the

IEE

Rep

ort

5

1

Air

qu

ali

ty m

o

6

Ye

ar

20

11

od

elin

g f

or

nit

r

2

7

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

1

rog

en

dio

xid

e (

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

(30

1)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

101

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5

Air

qu

ality

m

6

mo

delin

g f

or

nit

2

7

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

tro

gen

ox

ide (

3

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

304)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

102

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5

Air

qu

a

6

lity

mo

delin

g f

2

7

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

for

so

ot

(32

8)

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

103

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5 A

ir q

uality

mo

6

od

eli

ng

fo

r s

ul

2

7

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

lph

ur

dio

xid

e (

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

330)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

104

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5

Air

qu

ali

ty m

6

mo

de

lin

g f

or

ca

7 2

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

arb

on

ox

ide

(3

3

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

37)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

105

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5

Air

qu

ality

m

6

mo

delin

g f

or

be

7 2

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

en

zop

yre

ne

(7

0

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

03) 4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

106

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5

Air

qu

ality

m

6

mo

de

lin

g f

or

for

2

7

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

rmald

eh

yd

e (

13

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

32

5)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

107

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5 A

ir q

uality

m

6

od

elin

g f

or

pe

t

2

7

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

tro

l fr

acti

on

(2

7

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

704)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

108

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5 A

ir q

ua

lity

mo

6

od

elin

g f

or

para

7 2

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

aff

in f

racti

on

(2

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

2732)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

109

IEE

Rep

ort

Air

qu

al

ity m

od

eli

ng

fo

1 5 o

r n

itro

gen

dio

6

ox

ide

(3

01)

an

d

Ye

ar

2

01

7 2

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

d s

ulp

hu

r d

ioxi

6

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

ide

(33

0)

tota

l i

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dg

imp

act

(60

53

)

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

110

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5 A

ir q

ua

lity

mo

6

od

eli

ng

fo

r n

itr

7 2

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

rog

en

dio

xid

e (

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

(30

1)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

111

IEE

Rep

ort

5

1

Air

qu

ality

m

6

mo

delin

g f

or

nit

2

7

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

tro

gen

ox

ide (

3

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

304)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

112

IEE

Rep

ort

5

1

Air

qu

a

6

lity

mo

delin

g f

2

7

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

for

so

ot

(32

8)

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

113

IEE

Rep

ort

Air

1 5 q

ua

lity

mo

de

li

6

ng

fo

r s

ulp

hu

r

7 2

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

r d

ioxid

e (

330)

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

114

IEE

Rep

ort

5

1

Air

qu

ali

ty m

6

mo

de

lin

g f

or

ca

7 2

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

arb

on

ox

ide

(3

3

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

37)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

115

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5

Air

qu

ality

m

6

mo

delin

g f

or

be

7 2

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

en

zop

yre

ne

(7

0

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

03) 4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

116

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5

Air

qu

ality

m

6

mo

de

lin

g f

or

for

7 2

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

rmald

eh

yd

e (

13

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

32

5)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

117

IEE

Rep

ort

1 5 A

ir q

uality

m

6

od

elin

g f

or

pe

t

2

7

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

tro

l fr

acti

on

(2

7

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

704)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

118

IEE

Rep

ort

5

1

Air

qu

ali

ty m

o

6

od

elin

g f

or

para

2

7

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

aff

in f

racti

on

(2

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

2732)

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dgMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

119

IEE

Rep

ort

Air

qu

al

ity m

od

eli

ng

fo

5

1

or

nit

rog

en

dio

6

ox

ide

(3

01)

an

d

7 2

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

d s

ulp

hu

r d

ioxi

3

: E

ng

inee

rin

g,P

rocu

rebili

si-R

ust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

ide

(33

0)

tota

l i

4

em

en

t, C

onst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dg

imp

act

(60

53

)

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rbaija

ni B

ord

e

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Ro

ad

120

Values omotor trthe stand Table daAppendix 7.2.2 N Modeling Evaluatioby varioulevels proFHWA, C1994 are Table 5.6

backbulldogradecompjackhpile d

According Table 5.6

ComFrontBackTractScrapPaveTruckComcraneJackhVibraSaws

of ambient raffic withindards.

ata on concex # 4.

oise Factor

g of Noise R

on of construus equipmenoduced at 5CADOT, and about:

6 a

hoes ozers ers pressors hammers drivers

g to other so

6 b

pacters (rollt loaders

khoes tors pers, grader

ers ks pressors e, movable hammers an

ator s

Loan2565Modernizatio

air pollution Tbilisi-Rus

entration at

r Related to

Related to C

uction relatednt and activi50 ft (15.24d SBAG 199

Source o1. Con

ources (U.S.

Source oCons

ers)

rs

nd rock drills

55-GEO: Engineeon of Tbilisi-Rus

General

on caused stavi conne

control poin

o Constructi

Constructio

d noise relieities at indivm) as provi93; and Cou

f Noisenstruction m

. Environme

f Noise struction ma

s

ering,Procuremetavi Section of th

Conclusion

by the exisecting high

nts in 2011-2

ion and Ope

on Activities

es upon knowvidual stagesided by the untry Sanita

machinery a

ntal Protecti

achinery an

ent, Construction he Tbilisi-Red bri

n:

sting and phway rehab

2016 are giv

eration of th

s

wn informatis of construU.S. Depa

ation Districts

Eand mechan

on Agency,

End mechanis

Management anidge (Azerbaijani

perspectiveilitation wil

ven in Appe

he Road

on on the noction. For ertment of Ts of Los An

quivalent nnisms

8484918085

96

1972,):

quivalent nsms

727272788085837575827072

nd Supervision i Border) Road

12

e intensity ol not excee

endix # 3 an

oise produceexample noisransportatio

ngeles Coun

noise level, d

4 - 85 4 - 85

- 92 0 - 88 5 - 98

- 107

noise level, d

2 - 75 2 - 83 2 - 92 8 - 95 0 - 95 5 - 88 3 - 93 5 - 88 5 - 85 2 - 98 0 - 82 2 - 82

21

of ed

nd

ed se

on, nty

dBA

dBA

Noise gefollows lomodel shSound ledecreaseTable 5.6

Dista

Summar The presm from th Operatio Emission The noisnoise souor semi-cNoise Lerate of 3 highway distance. The sembased onParagrap A.7.2 Tahighway.A

Dista

The traffiacceptablevel is ex

enerated by ogarithmic phould be appevel2 = 20 loes by 6dBA (6 c

ance from tof the Road

5 10 20 40 80

160 320

ry

sent and anthe highway t

on Phase

n impacts rel

e from the urce is combcylindrical pvel 1 – NoisdBA for eaas a “line

mi-quantitativn the noise mph.

able shows A.7.2 Table

ance from tedge

5 10 20 40

ic noise will ble. Despite xpected unti

Loan2565Modernizatio

mobile soupattern. In caplied. Point-sog r2/r1. This(“inverse squ

he Edge d m

icipated noisthe noise lev

ated to curre

line source bined with thpattern. The se Level 2 =ach doubling

source” an

ve assessmmeasuremen

the noise lee. Anticipate

he Road

not spreadthe anticipail 2030.


rces naturaase of conssource propas meansthat uare law”).

PredictedAverage

se levels alovel is accept

ent condition

spreads ouhe point sou

noise spre =10 log r2/

gof distancend take into

ent of the nts. The ave

evels specifed Noise Le

Anticipa(ave

d

farther thanted increase


lly attenuatestruction relaagation can for every d

Noise LeveValue - dBa80746862565044

ong the roatable without

ns of traffic.

ut in case urce, the sou

ead forecast/r1. The soun. We shouldaccount 3

present anderage and m

fied by the evels

ated Noise erage) dBa65625956

n 5-10m froe of traffic vo


es at a certated noise, be defined a

doubling of d

ela

PredicMaxim

ad are insignt any mitiga

of continuound waves st from the lind level of ad consider tdBA reduct

d anticipatemaximum da

law for var

Ant

om the road olume, no w


tain distancepoint sourceas follows: Sdistance, the

cted Noise mum Value

90847872666054

nificant. Actuation measur

ous traffic flospread out iine source a line sourcethe traffic flotion for eac

d traffic noata are prese

rious distan

ticipated No(maximum)

dBa78757168

edge. The worrying rise


12

e. Attenuatioe propagatioSound level1e sound lev

Level - dBa

ually, in 40-5res.

ow. If the linn a cylindricis as follow

e reduces at ow on a bush doubling

ise impact ented in 4.1

nces from th

oise )

noise level e of the nois

22

on on –

vel

50

ne cal ws:

a sy of

is .3

he

is se

7. 3 7.3.1 Improprisk ofand fu 7.3.1.1 Variouproducexpecpollutio WasteDuring1. Ho2. Ha3. No Inert W The rodebrisamouncompa

x

x

The inauthorbelow Hazar

x x x x x x x x

Table

Waste Typ

Domestic waste

Potential I

Pollution a

per handlingf water/ soil uelling of equ

1 Construc

us wastes cing areas ated along ton.

e Classificag the construousehold; azardous indon-hazardou

Waste

oad construcs – constructnt of inert wared with the

milled pavpavement Only someloose soil w

nert waste drities. The d.

rdous IndusPolluted soPolluted raPolluted wPolluted inPaint vessLubricant vEmpty vesPolluted pe

7.4 Types a

pe WasteCatego

non-hazardos

LoMod

Impacts Re

and Waste

g, storage, ucontaminatiouipment cou

ction Relate

will be proare: construthe access

tion uction of the

dustrial; us industrial;

ction mainly tion materiawaste produe other road vement - 11or repairs ofe of excavawill be dump

disposal areisposal area

strial Wasteoil; ags and oil a

water; ndustrial equels and brusvessels; ssels of packersonal safe

and Estimate

e ory

EstimQuant

(with umeasur

)

ou80-100 mannually


elated To the

se and dispoon at the cold also lead

ed Wastes

oduced throction sites aand heavy

bypass the

produces inls which hauced during sections.

,880 m3 (muf other road

ated soil will ed in the dis

eas will be sas suggested

e

absorbing fab

ipment in disshes;

kaging; ety equipmen

ed Quantities

mated tities

unit of rement

W

m3

y to bCon


e Construct

osal of consnstruction sito the poten

oughout the and constru equipment

following ty

nert construcave not been

the constr

ust be placesections) be used fro

sposal area.

selected by d by the EIA

bric;

srepair;

nt and clothi

s of Waste

Waste Manag

be transferredntractor for di


tion Activiti

struction matite and storantial contami

constructioction campst movement

pes of waste

ction waste, n used and uction of th

ed as a rese

fills. At leas

the contracA team are d

ng.

gement

d to the sposal

Wssi


ies

terials and wage site. Impination of so

on process.s. Small amt routes wit

e will be prod

excavated sneed to be

he design ro

erve and fu

st 95,330 m

ctor a nd agdiscussed in

Alternative

Waste can beseparated on site and someit (paper, glas


wastes couldproper maintoil/ water.

. The mainmounts of wath ground a

duced:

soil, loose rodisposed. T

oad section

rther used f

m3 of excava

greed with thn 8.1.1.3 Pa

es RespoIss

e

e of ss,

Con

rvision ) Road

123

d pose a tenance

n waste aste are and soil

ock and The total

is less

for asphalt

ated and

he local ragraph

onsibility sue(s)

ntractor

7.3.1.2 Potent

Office waste(sweepings,glass and plastic bottlestationery)

Sewage

Burned-out bulbs

Printer cartridges

Medical was

Damaged oroutdated too Personal protection aclothes oil soaked rags and absorbents

Cut trees

2 Soil Poll

tial pollutant

e ,

es,

non-hazardos

hazardos

hazardos

hazardos

ste hazardos

r ols

non-hazardos

nd non-hazardos

hazardos

non-hazardos

LoMod

ution

ts from a pro

ou10-15 mannually

ou 1500 m3

annually

ou 50-70 pi

ou 2-3 piecannually

ou 0.1kg annually

ou1-2m3

annually

ou1 m3

ou The quadepend oil spill s1m3 ann

ou


oject of this n

m3

y to bCon

3

y Sewthe on t

ieces to bcon

ces y

Recthecon

y to bcon

y to bcon

to bcon

antities on the

scale nually

2. toplasand

to bloca


nature includ

be transferredntractor for di

wage is dischsewer netwo

the contracts be transferredntractor for dis

charged 3-4 tn transferred

ntractor for dis

be transferredntractor for dis



o be collectedstic or metal cd temporarily

be transferredal authorities


de the follow

pttfr

d to the sposal

Wssipttfr

arged into ork based

d to the sposal

1tm2tcr

imes and to the

sposal

1tm2tcr

d to the sposal

ttf

d to the sposal

d to the sposal

d in containers stored

1ttf2ttf

d to the tta


wing:

plastic) can btransferred tothe Contractofor recycling reuse. Waste can beseparated on site and someit (paper, glasplastic) can btransferred tothe Contractofor recycling reuse.

1. returned the manufacturer2. transferredthe licenscontractor recycling 1. returned the manufacturer2. transferredthe licenscontractor recycling to be transferto the contracfor incineratio

1. to be transferred tothe contractofor incineratio2. to be transferred tothe contractofor storage

to be transferto kindergarteand schools


be o or or

e

e of ss, be o or or

Contrac

Contrac

to

r d to sed for

Contrac

to

r d to sed for

Contrac

rred ctor on

Contrac

Contrac

Contarc

o r

on

o r

Contrac

rred ens

Contrac

rvision ) Road

124

ctor

ctor

ctor

ctor

ctor

ctor

ctor

ctor

ctor

-

- -

Extremcontam 7.3.1.3 Water

- - -

- Spillagwatercdownspollutio Once earthwthe wo 7.3.1.4 Reconearth wfact thauthor 7.3.1.5

- -

Expos 7.3.2 The dprotecpotent The deThe vespecieDetailewalnutand v(rare sbotani 7.3.3 I The paffecte

Diesel fuelvehicles anMiscellaneConstructiowood, etc.

mely small aminated soil

3 Surface W

r pollution maSpillages oSilt suspenWashing owatercoursExposure o

ges etc macourse, it castream. It is on incident.

the working works in a weork area. Riv

4 Biologic

ntamination bworks near tat a large amrities.

5 Topsoil lTopsoil waSilt runoff t

sure of conta

Impact

design area cted territorietial negative

esign implemegetation m

es listed in ed botanicalt ( Juglans rulnerable spspecies), thecal studies c

Impact on F

roject is noted by the co

LoMod

l, lubrication nd machiner

eous pollutanon wastes (p) mount of ha, etc) cons

Water and G

ay result froof fuel, oil or nded in runoof vehicles ose crossingsof contamina

ay travel qan be difficul

therefore vi

width has bet weather tver Iori is the

al Recontam

by infectiousthe pest holemount of the

losses due ashout due toto watercouraminated lan

ts on Flora.

is located ies, wetlandse impact on v

mentation enmainly compr

the Red Lisl studies shoregia L) and pecies in the Turkish Pconducted p

Fauna

t expected tonstruction is


oils and hydry nts (e.g. asppackaging, s

azardous wastituting abo

Groundwat

m a variety or other hazaroff waters (“cr equipments by heavy mated land an

uickly downlt to contain ital that prom

been strippedhis may resu

e major rece

mination

s biological mes (i.e. not ree spontaneo

to topsoil so improper srses and wand

.

n the urbans, forests ovegetation s

nvisages curises a greest of Georgiowed that twthe Field El

he project aPine Pinus eprior to the co

to have sigs bats. The


draulic fluids

phalt, cemenstones and g

stes (e.g. waout 0.1% of t

er Pollution

of sources, irdous substaconstruction t or disturbanmachinery nd groundwa

nhill to a wthe pollutio

mpt action is

d of topsoil, ult in uncontptor sensitiv

materials (e.egistered Anus burial site

stripping storage and

ater bodies

n and adjacr other sens

should be tak

tting of abouen belt alonia and some

wo species lism (Ulmus mrea, includin

eldarica (endonstruction n

gnificant impimpact can


s, antifreeze

t and concregravel, ceme

aste oils, oilyotal amount

n

including theance, especwater”)

nce of water

ater

watercourseon which cans taken in th

the subsoil btrolled releasve to the incr

.g. Anthrax) nthrax sites)es is not reg

reinstateme

cent transforsitive habitaken into acc

ut 1000 treeng the highwe endangerested in the R

minor Mill). Tng the silvedangered spneed to be v

pact on the Fbe mitigated


, etc. from c

ete) ent and conc

y rags, spent of the waste

e following:ially during r

rcourse bank

e or water n then impache event of

becomes exse of suspenreased sedim

is a potentia. The risks a

gistered by th

ent

rmed landscats and ecocount.

s in the wideway. Howeved species Red List of Ghere are als

er berry Elaepecies), etc.verified.

Fauna. The d by checkin


onstruction

crete residue

nt filters, es.

refueling

ks and bed d

body. Oncct over a wiany potentia

xposed. Durinded solids fment load.

al threat duriare related tohe relevant

cape. Theresystems. Ho

ened road sver, there arin the proje

Georgia, namso rare, endaeagnus ang The results

only specieng old buildin

rvision ) Road

125

e,

during

ce in a de area al water

ng from

ing o the

are no owever,

ections. re some ct area.

mely the angered gustifolia s of the

es to be ngs and

hollowoff bat 7.3.4 The de 7.3.5 The pr 7.3.6 measuthe vconstrsourcewater water Regula13.11.LicensWasteMaximdetermvaluesNormsthe Mieach p 7.3.7 assocsufficieknownidentifbe asSovietbe takroad archeoaccep 7.3.8 Heavywithin contravicinityconstrfrom qimpac

x x x x x

7.3.9

w trees prior t colonies.

Protected

esign road d

Landscape

roject does n

Water uures (water icinity of thruction workes or from gintake, howintake (inc

ations ( Te.2008). Intase for Use ewater dischmum Admismines limits fs (Limits) ars for surfaceinistry of Labpolluter of th

Impacts oiated with tent data on n archaeologfied during th sensitive at times someken not onlywill be upological relicted as suffic

Transport y trucks are

the construactor. Howevy to the hruction matequarries to tts are anticip

Noise & ViTraffic conAir pollutioMud on roaRefueling, contamina

Traffic Dis

LoMod

to their dem

Areas

does not lie i

e.

not envisage

se. Water wbowsers). The project s and particgroundwater

wever specialuding indic

echnical Regke of the gof Groundw

harge in susible Dischfor dischargre determinee water. Sanbor, Health ahe surface w

on Archaeolthe risks ofarchaeolog

gical sites ahe baseline as already ke archaeology at the newgraded andcs could becient mitigati

related imp required touction corridver, the closighway and

erials. No nethe highwaypated in thatibration Impa

ngestion (nuion (dust; emiads

maintenantion

sruption


molishing or c

n the vicinity

e any impact

will be requThe amount

sites (rivercularly for thr sources (wal form shoucation of intgulations agroundwaterwater (accorface water

harge Limitsing wastewa

ed for each nitary Normsand Social Pater objects

logical Sitef damaging ical status o

and visible sstudies con

known archgical artifact

w constructiod widened. an issue aon measure

pacts o deliver reqdor. Selectioest licensed

d the highwew access roy do not past regard: acts sance) issions)

ce and ve


cutting. A sim

y of the prote

t on the valu

uired for maof required

r Rioni; groe camp opewells). No Wuld be filled take volumepproved byr for camp ording to ther objects nes, which shater with giveparticular fa

s for SurfaceProtection, w.

es. Land cleaundergroun

of the projecsigns of potenducted by taeological ss have been

on sites, but It should

and chance e at the stage

quired amouon of suppl

d quarries anway is the oads are reqss close to

hicle cleani


mple acoust

ected territo

uable natura

aintenance water is no

oundwater erations couWater Intake

to demonses) are in cy the Order

operations e Law on

eeds develohould be aen concentraacility in orde Water is th

while the Disc

arance worknd archaeolct corridor. Nential archathe IEE teamsites. Duringn destroyed.also at the be unders

finds procee of planning

unt of inert ier is the p

nd borrow pimain trans

quired and tany of the

ing and rel


ic method ca

ries.

l landscape.

works and ot high and t

resources). ld be made

e Permit is trate that th

compliance r No 745 odoes not reLicenses an

opment of sagreed withations of pol

der to complhe generic rcharge Limit

ks, grading alogical remn

No abovegroaeological remThe not evg constructi Therefore, sites where

stood that edure proposg.

materials toprerogative its are locatesportation rothe existing settlements

lated risks


an be used t

.

for dust prothe sources

Water intafrom surfacneeded for

he terms of with the Te

of MoE, issequire obtand Permits,pecial docu

h MoE andlutants. Thely with the Segulation issts are calcul

and excavatinants. Thereound monumemnants havvaluated siteon of the rspecial care

e the existinonly undiscsed in chap

o the needeof the consed in the immoute for deshort acces

s. Different t

of soil and

rvision ) Road

126

to scare

otection exist in

ake for ce water

surface surface

echnical sued on ining of 2008).

ument – d which e agreed Sanitary sued by ated for

ions are e is no

ments or ve been es could roads in e should g motor covered

pter 8 is

ed sites struction mediate elivering ss roads types of

d water

Intensof matcertainLocal is tembenefi Howevthe wine laicrucia 7.3.10 Fill voCut voFilling emban Heavywithin contravicinityconstrfrom q So farthe limimpacthis IE 7.3.11 The econstrvehicle(appro The econstr

x x x

The deare de 7.3.12 The roof conemissproduc

sive runs of terials to then safety risktraffic can b

mporary, inscial.

ver, the maindening of thns amy affel to mitigate

0 Quarry-re

lume – 285,olume - 1148

materials nkments - 28

y trucks arethe constru

actor. Howevy to the hruction matequarries to th

r as licensedmits for expts are mitiga

EE in that cas

Constructi

experience oruction campes and 150 ox. 2 ha) and

exact locatioruction and o

potential dapollution cawaste and

esign and oetailed in 8.1

2Constructio

oad will be ancrete plantions, dust, ction will be

LoMod

heavy trucke needed sitks for the poe impacted

significant a

n risk of the he road is toect traffic othese risks.

elated Impa

080 m3. 820 m3 to be tran

85,080 m3

required touction corridver, the closighway and

erials. No nehe highway d

d quarries anloration andated by appse is to use

ion Camp-r

of constructp for accomunits of head concrete p

on will be soperation areamage to theaused by fuesewage ma

peration pro1.1.13 Parag

on Related

a cement conts and gravnoise etc. acquired thr


s are requiretes within th

opulation andby transport

and manage

traffic disrup be carried on existing r

act

nsported fro

o deliver reqdor. Selectioest licensed

d the highwew access rodo not pass

nd borrow pid environmeropriate opeonly license

related Impa

ing other semmodation of

vy constructplant (approx

selected by e summarizee humus topel storage annagement.

ocedures andgraph of the

Impacts at

ncrete pavemvel crushingGravel and

rough licens


ed to deliverhe constructid, therefore,t activities reeable. Long

ption is relatout at the exroad. Prope

om quarries

quired amouon of suppl

d quarries anway is the oads are reqclose to any

ts are suppoental requireerations of thed suppliers

acts

ections of Ef 200 worketion machinex. 3 ha) nee

the Contraed below: psoil; nd vehicle fu

d conditionsEIA regardi

the Concre

ment and asg sites for d any othersed operator


r required amion corridor., complianceelated to theg-term impa

ted to the facxisting and fr organizatio

and borro

unt of inert ier is the p

nd borrow pimain trans

quired and ty of the settle

osed to be uements are he license-hof construct

E-60 showsers (approx. ery like bulldd to be cons

actor. The p

uelling;

s and optimung the mitiga

ete Plant an

sphalt will noconcrete in

r supply mars.


mount of ine The constr

e with safetye project. Theact on loca

ct that the cofunctional roon of const

ow pits for

materials toprerogative its are locatesportation rothe existing ements.

used by consfixed in liceolder. The mion materials

that tempo 1.5 ha are

dozers, excastructed.

potential im

um location oation measu

d Gravel Cr

ot be used anclude landsaterials ne


ert materials ruction sites y rules is ime mentionedl traffic sho

onstruction road. Construtruction activ

arrangeme

o the needeof the consed in the immoute for deshort acces

struction conense and exmain requires.

orary worksea), a yard avators, cran

pacts of the

options of thures.

rushing Fac

at all. Direct scape degraeeded for c

rvision ) Road

127

amount impose

mportant. d impact ould be

rlated to uction of vities is

ent of the

ed sites struction mediate elivering ss roads

ntractor, xpected

ement of

, e.g. a for 100

nes, etc.

e camp

he camp

cilities

impacts adation, concrete

Dust istoragsignific Dust efacilitie

s most signge. Potentialcant impact.

emission anes.

LoMod

nificant impal pollution o

nd noise is


act related tof watercour

characteris


to concrete rses by cem

stic impact


plant operament slurry

associated


ations and malso should

with the op


material supd be conside

peration of

rvision ) Road

128

pply and ered as

crusher

8. MIT 8.1 M8.1.1 8.1.1.1 The drisks. There RoW. 8.1.1.2 Water/site fo Water/site fo Prevebe req Contrastoragbe plastoredcapacconcrebe puspillagsawdu All fuewhen No fuwatercVehiclthe woplace pollutioSoiledof signthe eli(i.e. nOperainapprguardebut notanks minimleaks undert

TIGATION &

MITIGATION Mitigation

1 Preventi

esign is pre

are no land

2. Pollution

r/ Soil Pollutr prevention

r/ Soil Pollutr prevention

nt operationquired to ens

actors will ege tanks will aced in a bud within the bity or 25% oete-lined), wmped out o

ge the spilledust, sand or

el / hydrocarnot in use.

el storage course, watees will not borking sites prior to theon risk will

d ground andnificant spill imination of ozzles of th

ators. Fuel ropriate coned to prevenot limited towill be ma

ized. Daily por other protaken in d

LoMod

& ENVIRONM

MEASUREn of Constru

on and Miti

epared cons

dslide prone

n Preventio

ion. Specifin of water an

ion. Specifin of water an

of vehicles sure that the

nsure the pnot be locatnd of at leasbund, the sy

of their total cwithout drainaof the bund d fuel shouldstraw.

bon dispens

or refuelinger body, webe left withouwill use abs

e commencebe reduced

d absorbentsauthorized apollution ris

he appropriasupply equdition of refnt pollution

o cranes, coaintained anplant checksoblems are designated


MENTAL MA

ES uction Relat

gation of G

idering 8 de

areas or oth

n Measures

ic mitigationnd soil polluti

ic mitigationnd soil polluti

in the river ere is no leak

roper handlted within 50st 110% of tystem must capacity, whage points oto either dra

d be recollec

sing nozzles

g of vehicleell, dry gorgut supervisiosorbent padement of re or eliminats will be remand responssk Refuelingate size), anuipments wifueling equipdue to case

ompressors, nd operateds (Vehicle Ma

apparent. Vareas of


ANAGEMEN

ted Impacts

Geohazardou

egree seism

her high risk

s:

measures sion:

measures sion:

and if there kage of fuel

ing of lubric0m of any wathe tank’s mbe capable

hichever is gor other breaains or the cted and con

s are to be o

es or equipmge or within on during reds and/or strefueling opeted in case

moved, storesible person

g will alwaysnd only by sill be regulpments. Eques of stealin

generators such that aintenance P

Vehicle mainhard-stand


NT PLAN

s

us Process

ic zone and

geological p

should be im

should be im

is no alternaand lubricat

cants, fuel anatercourse, w

maximum capof storing 1

greater. The aches. Accuground if u

ntaminated b

of a drip cont

ment will bany design

fueling procraw to minimerations. Gro

of immediaed and treaten will be infos be carried suitably trainarly reviseduipment andg or vandal

s, bulldozersall leaks a

Procedure) wntenance, cling, not o


ses

d is relevant

processes d

mplemented

mplemented

ative, inspecing materials

nd solvents.well or dry gpacity. If mo10% of the bund will bemulated rainncontaminatbund treated

trol design a

be allowed wnated wetlancess. All refumize spills, wound water te removal

ed as hazardrmed, worksout with the

ned and expd to prevend storages wism. All mo

s, excavatorand spills owill be undeleaning, degover made


to existing

eveloped w

at the cons

at the cons

ction of vehis.

. Fuel and lugorges. All taore than one

biggest cone impermeabnwater in buted. In case

d by the abso

and securely

within 50m nd area or

ueling operatwhich will beand surfaceof polluted

dous waste. s will be stoe correct equperienced Rent leakage will be isolabile plant, inrs etc. and of materials rtaken to en

greasing etcunstable

rvision ) Road

129

seismic

ithin the

struction

struction

cles will

ubricant anks will e tank is ntainer’s ble (e.g. unds will e of fuel orbents:

y locked

of any aquifer. tions on e put in e water ground. In case pped till uipment efueling due to

ted and ncluding storage will be

nsure no c will be

ground

(embamachiwell omobilewetlan Erosiorunoff Contraany ruisolateany waWherewater Such m• Use • Use • Use • Use naturabe dis Wet ce Signifiare plelimina Erosiogorge are enrequireallowe 8.1.1.3 Inert cGenergenerabetter last re The tosectio The quand aconstr Only srock sin the

ankments etnery mainter dry gorge.

e plant withinds and aqu

on control minto the wat

actor will plaunoff. Contrae wash dowatercourse. e any area body, effectmeasures mof silt fencesof straw baleof a system of holding/s

al settling ratposed

ement and/o

cant impactlanned. Grated in case

on control anwith season

nvisaged aned, in case

ed neart the

3 Construc

constructiorally, it is reation resultito reuse, re

esort.

otal amount n is less com

uantities of tadvisable. Truction or roa

some of excahould be plavicinity of no

LoMod

tc.). Water enance. Main. The storagn 50m of alifers will be

measures wtercourses.

an all excavactors will bn areas from of the spreative measure

may include: s es to deflectof bunds ansettling lagother than floc

or concrete w

ts on groundround watere of immedia

nd pollution nal stream, nd in additioif during condry gorge.

ction Waste

n waste haecognized tng in minim

estore and re

of inert wampared with

the milled pahe milled pad section re

avated soil waced in soil don-functiona


Tanks withntenance poge of potentll watercoursprohibited.

ill be applie

ations, topsbe required m watercour

ad is at riskes will be pu

t and filter wnd grips to poons to storcculants to f

will not be al

dwater are nr pollution riate removal o

prevention in the area

on installationstruction er

e Managem

ndling that the bes

mizing the qecycle the w

ste producethe other se

avement is –pavement isepairs.

will be used deposit area

al Iagluja dis


h sprinklersoints will not tially pollutinses/water bo

ed during co

oil and substo organizerses by sele

k from silt put in place to

water revent watere water runfacilitate sed

llowed to en

not envisageisk related of polluted g

measures aof planned

on of temporosion will b

ent

st option hauantities anaste rather t

ed during theections cons

– 11,880 m3 stored in t

for fills. at leas. It is worthsposal area,


s are envisabe located w

ng materialsodies, dry ri

onstruction

soil storage and cover

ecting areas

pollution waso ensure that

r from enterinning off thedimentation f

ter any wate

ed as no blato fuel leak

ground

are planned bridge. Slo

orary berms e stimulated

as always nd hazard. Tthan to proc

e constructiostruction.

3. The reusethe borrow

east 95,330 hy of note thwhich is du


aged for wwithin 50m o, refueling averbeds and

activities to

so as to redmaterial sto

s that are no

shing off intot such pollut

ing watercoue spread. It following wh

ercourse, po

sting operatkages are m

for the site pe landscapand sedim

d. No fuelling

been the aThen it is reess it, and t

on of the af

e of milled papit and reu

m3 of excavhat the desige to be close


watering roaof any waterand maintend within des

prevent inc

duce to a morage areasot free drain

o a watercotion does no

urses, etc. is intended

hich clean wa

ond or ditch.

tions and deminimal and

of crossing ping and veg

ment traps cg operations

avoidance oecognized thhe placeme

forementione

avement is pused in pa

vated soil angned road is ed. We reco

rvision ) Road

130

ads and rcourse, ance of

signated

creased

minimum s and to ning into

ourse of ot occur.

d to use ater can

eep cuts will be

the dry getation ould be s will be

f waste hat it is nt is the

ed road

possible avement

nd loose located

ommend

to tranand co HazarAccordProtecon muMoE alube ostorag(e.g. S 8.1.1.4 The seemissengineoperat RelativHowevfrom bmitiga As a impacconstrnot soentran Mitigaenginedeployworks All vehworkedayligneed t Regulaminimstandaused minim Vehiclcompowill be If deelikely Mitiga

x

nsport inert onservation.

rdous Consding to locaction of 24.0unicipal landfand local auoils, for safe ge sites and Sanitari Ltd),

4 Noise, du

ettlements aions of heae maintenantion mode sh

vely high imver, it is obv

borrow-pits wted by perio

result of rout will not

ruction grouno densely conce.

tion of this e work in ny high noise

hicles shall rs or local ht working hto eliminate

ar maintenaized, for exard to ensuron site will ize potential

e refueling ounds througe used to sto

med necessto be prodution measur

Damping d2 browsersnot be limit

LoMod

construction

truction Waal legislatio2.2003) smafills. Disposa

uthorities. Cotransport ofurther at th having env

ust and em

are not affecavy machinence practicehould be exc

mpact is convious that thewill impose ndical waterin

ugh estimatiexceed radnd within theoncentrated

minor impaon-operationdevices, like

be maintainpeople. Ne

hours to redincreased le

ance of diexample by re that vehic

be regularllly polluting e

will be ungh the use o

ored fuel).

sary in dry cuced mitigatres will includdown using ws will be requted by this fi


n waste (spo

astes n (Order #all amounts al of the moonstructing Cff-site for rehe locationsironmental p

issions

cted significaery involvede and usagecluded.

nnected withe earth worknuisance relang of the wo

ion of constdius of 80me 80-100m rnear the ro

ct is possibnal mode. Te crushers,

ned so that ar the settle

duce impactsevel of noise

esel enginescleaning fueles are safey maintaineexhaust emi

dertaken soof fuel nozzle

conditions otion measurde: water bowseuired for thaigure, and if


oil) to Iagluja

#36/N of theof listed typst part of haContractor s

euse, recyclis approved bpermit on op

antly by the d in the cone of good q

h the dust eks and transpated with duork sites.

truction relam.Temporaryradius is accad, except t

ble by enginThe only limoutside the

their noise ements, thes. All vehicle

e due to dam

s will be uel injectors.

e and that emed so as to issions.

o as to avoes and pump

r where sigres will be

ers with sprat purpose. Hrequired ad


a disposal a

e Minister oes of hazard

azardous washall collect ng, treatmenby MoE or p

peration of th

constructionnstruction squality fuel.

emissions, wportation of st. This is te

ated noise, wy increase ceptable impthe end poin

e maintenamitation that residential z

and emissie rehabilitaties will be ch

maged parts.

undertaken t. Routine mmissions and

be in good

oid fugitive ps and enclo

nificant quaarranged w

ay bars or otHowever, theditional brow


area and use

of Labour, dous wastesastes should

hydrocarbont or dispospass it to thhe hazardou

n related emhould be mThe work o

which hardlygravel and o

emporary im

we can assof the noi

pact The resnt (km 17.8)

nce practice could be r

zone and exc

ons do not ion activitieshecked and

to ensure tmaintenanced noise are d working o

emissions osed tanks (

ntities of duwith the Con

ther technicae constructinwsers should


e it for its

Health ands could be d be agreed wn wastes, in

sal at the teme licensed os wastes.

missions. Homanaged byof engines i

y can be quother inert mpact, and sh

ume that thse level ne

sidential hou) located in

e and avoidrecommendeclude the nig

cause nuiss will be limrepaired in

that emissio will be to minimized. Arder at all t

of volatile (no open con

ust are beingnstruction M

al means; Mng contractord be engage

rvision ) Road

131

closure

d Social isposed with the ncluding mporary operator

owever, y proper n a no-

antified. materials hould be

he noise ear the

uses are Rustavi

ance of ed is to ght-time

ance to mited to case of

ons are a high

All plant times to

organic ntainers

g or are Manager.

Minimum r should

ed.

x x

x

Such m 8.1.1.5

Accordmostlypit.Theof supquarriethe mrequireany ofconstrlicensemain materilicenserequire Generpollutioapprovdegradmaximsedimexcavaconstrproduc The mapprov(includwith arestorasatisfavisual not beof MoEto the Gener

x

x x

x x

Sheeting oUse of defwill be tranMaterials constructioworkers aseliminate in

measures w

5 Quarryin

ding to the y needed foe map of popplier is thees and borroain transpored and the ef the settlemruction contre and expecrequirementials. Howeves for operaements to be

rally quarry on, loss of ved limits mdation. The

mize the amoentation, (iiation, (v) prruction. Once copy of n

mitigation plaved by the ding restoratall applicabation of borraction of the

uniformity oe opened witE. Topsoil frsatisfaction

ral principlesDo not useborrow and It is accepDevelop athe EngineDo not excThe borrow

LoMod

of constructiofined haulagensported to stransported

on site will bs necessaryncreased em

will be used, w

ng Sites and

design, theor constructiootentially usae prerogativeow pits are lrtation routeexisting sho

ments. So farractor, the licted impactst of this IEE

ver, it is notating its owne met during

sites are thbiodiversity

may cause coperating

ount of fill thi) preserve

revent wildlifnly approvednecessary go

an to be folloenvironmen

tion if it will le environmrow areas ae MoE and Ror to create thout the resrom the opeof the MoE.

s recommene borrow exd select topppted to used nd restore G

eer. cavate beyonw pit shall be


on materialse routes andsite in off pea

to site wie watered ay. All vehiclmission due where huma

d Borrow Pi

volume ofon of embaable licensede of the coocated in th

e for deliverrt access ror as licensedimits for exp

s are mitigateE in that cat excluded, borrow pits

g the explora

he major souy, and genechange of floprocedure fhat can be e

the water fe from fallind borrow anovernment li

owed by the ntal authorityfollow the c

mental standnd their surRD; (iv) bopermanent

storation of tning of borro.

ded for borrxcavation unping as showonly license

Government

nd the estabe landscaped


s and storaged reductionsak hours. ll be cover

as appropriates will be cto damaged

an or animal

its

f fills is abonkements ad borrow pitsonstruction ce immediateing construc

oads from qud quarries anploration aned by approase is to usthat the co

s and quarrieation of quar

urces of enveration of spoodplain hydfor borrow peffectively uquality of

ng into the nd quarry scenses to th

Contractor ay will be us

completion odards and roundings, i

orrow pit aretanks/dams

those areas ow pits will b

ow pit and qtil all suitab

wn on the plaed material s

located and

blished limitsd after the e


e piles; and in vehicle s

red/ wetted te. Protectivchecked andd parts

receptors lie

out 285,080 and thisshous is given in contractor. He vicinity to tction materiauarries to thend borrow pd environmepriate operase only liceonstruction ces, For that rries and bor

vironmental pills. Operatdrology and pits shall cosed from ththe rivers, pit, and (vi)

sites will behe client befo

at the borrowsed for the

of certain wospecification an environ

eas will be gs. Additionano longer in

be saved an

quarries manle roadway ans. suppliers d provided b

s. excavation.


speed where

down to re equipmend repaired

e within 300

m3.Gravel fuld be transp

Fig. 2.3, ClHowever, ththe highwayals. No newe highway dits are suppental require

ations of the nsed supplicontractor wcase this IErrow pits.

impact duetion of the qtrigger eros

onsider follohe pit, (ii) mi

(iv) protectreinstateme

used by thore procurem

w sites is: (i)project; (ii)

orks) shall bens; (iii) thnmentally sograded to enl borrow pitsn use, and wnd reused to

nagement: excavation

borrow sourc


e required. M

reduce dustt will be provin case of n

0 m of the RO

filling materported from ause 2-8. S

he closest ly and the higw access rodo not pass posed to be uements are license-holders of cons

will prefer toEE provided

e to dust anquarries abosion and lanowing princiinimize erost air qualityent of the she contractoment.

) only borrowpits manag

e in full comhe excavatiound mannensure drainas, if necesswithout the ao revegetate

is used. Use

ces as appro

rvision ) Road

132

Materials

t. The vided to need to

OW

rials are borrow

election icensed

ghway is ads are close to used by fixed in

der. The struction o obtain general

nd noise ove the

ndscape ples: (i)

sion and y during ite after ors and

w areas gement,

mpliance on and

er to the age and ary, will

approval the pits

e select

oved by

After tby Co Local equipmthe locroads The mcontamdescriRoad attenti The McompaContra 8.1.1.6 Contrathem tduringwind e The stof 450,

Contraaroundadversthe stprotec Topsoembanwill betopsoijudgedadjacefarthescloser topsoipromo Subsoa max

-

-

the closure onstruction C

roads will bment. In ordcal roads clto their origi

measures aimmination duebed pollutioDepartmenon to the qu

MoE and Envany’s perforactors in cas

6 Topsoil

actors will bto their orig

g constructioerosion.

torage of top, will take int

• Segreg• Dedica

movem• Segreg• No sto• No sto

actor will prod the outsidse conditionockpile or c

ctive silt fenc

oil removed fnkments or e reinstated l reinstatemd by the topent land. Whst away fromr to the stocl. The reinst

ote vegetativ

oil Storage ximum angle

Dedicated movementSegregatio

LoMod

of the borrowContractor.

e damaged er to reducelose to the inal conditio

med on mitige to impropn preventiont and Cons

uarrying site

vironmental rmance. Thse they are e

Protectiona

be encouraginal state af

on for signs o

psoil in stockto considera

gation of theated storagements or congation from srage where rage at less

otect the stode where ns be identifie

creating vencing will be e

from the conin the adjacseparately f

ment will be psoil strip duhen replacingm the stockckpiles, thustated topsoilve growth.

The storage of 600, will storage loc

ts or contamon from tops


w pits, reinst

during transe impact on settlements ns.

gation of theper fueling an measures,structing Coduring moni

Inspectoratehe Road Deexploring som

and Erosion

ed to minimfter completof erosion; lo

kpiles, no mation the follo

topsoil frome locations th

taminated bsubsoil stockthere is a pothan 100 m

ockpiles fromnecessary. Ted correctiv

ntilation holeerected;

nstruction sicent construcfrom subsoilsufficient to

uring visual og the topsoil

kpiles are res reducing th will then be

e of subsoil itake into cocations whe

minated by otsoil stockpile


tatement an

sportation oall borrow sused by th

e dust and eand vehicle but control ntractor’s eitoring.

e are in chaepartment wme quarries

n Control M

mize usage oion of civil wong-term ma

ore than 2mowing:

m the subsoilhat prevent by other matekpiles; otential for flfrom river/s

m flooding aTopsoil stoce actions wi

es through t

tes will be uction corrido, with care to restore thobservation l Contractor einstated firshe number e harrowed,

in stockpilesnsideration

ere the stocther materials.


d landscapin

of borrow masites and loche borrow tr

emission impoperation, son this sensnvironmenta

arge to contrwill control and borrow

Measures

of productiveworks. Embaaterial stock

m high with s

l stockpilesthe stockpileerials;

ooding; streams, sub

and run-off bckpiles will bill include: (ithe stockpile

used for reinor affected btaken to avo

he fertile deand compawill program

st with reinsof vehicle mwhere pract

s, no more ththe followingckpiles will ls; and


ng plan shou

aterials and cal roads, corucks and re

pacts, as weshould be tsitive site shal personne

rol complianthe license

w pits.

e agriculturaankments sh

kpiles will be

ide slopes a

es being co

bject to site s

by placing bbe monitore) anaerobic e; and (ii) e

nstatement oby the projecoid mixing ofpth to the irison of the

m the works statement gemovements tical, to prot

han 3m highg: not be com


uld be imple

by the consontractors wehabilitate th

ell as potenthe same as

hould be morl should pa

nce of the ques of Cons

al land and hould be mocovered to

at a maximum

mpacted by

specific topo

berms or eqed and shoconditions -

erosion - tem

of the topsoict activities. f the materiainitial conditreinstated ssuch that thetting progreover the reect the stab

h with side s

mpacted by

rvision ) Road

133

emented

struction will water

he local

tial river s above re strict.

ay more

uarrying struction

convert onitored prevent

m angle

y vehicle

ography.

uivalent uld any - turning mporary

il on the Topsoil

als. The tions as site and

he areas essively instated ility and

lopes at

vehicle

In the correc TempThe mhighwaTempoto:

-

- Tempoapprov

- - - -

8.1.1.7 All thereinstaclearasufficietrees i 8.1.1.8 The mecolog In ordneede

x

x

x

All theEnviroThe coeffortsof eacrefininenviroList arequiriobject List caremovdecisioGeorg

event that ctive action s

orary Erosimeasures, bay against orary erosio

Constructiosediment mStraw bale

orary erosioval of Road

Interrupt suSlow the vDivert watePrevent an

7 Final Re

e work sites ated to its in

ance and no ent for reinss considere

8 Landsca

most part ofgical value. T

er to proteced:

Preentry squantitavefelled. Exact demtrees) Detailed taExcluding

ese actionsonmental Maonstruction C

s to minimizech single spg should be

onment shound Red Boing change or infrastru

an be removval of the Ron by the M

gia “On the S

LoMod

the subsoil such as insta

ion Control by which Co

erosion bon control m

on activities mobilization e barriers in on control mDepartmenturface water

velocity of waer off exposend minimize

einstatemen

(except permnitial conditiowoodcutting

stating the nd below in a

ape Reinsta

f the RoW The project d

ct the sensiti

survey in thly assess th

marcation of

axation of tthe Project L

s should beanagement PContractor ae the impactecimen of the conducted

uld be conduook. Tree fe

of categorycture with a

ved from the Red-listed plMinistry of EnStructure, Au


stockpiles alling erosion

Measuresontractor wiefore permeasures will

that increasin watercoulocations req

measures wilt. The purpor run-off; ater runoff toed check dasediment tra

nt and Long

manently ocons (relief, tg is requirednatural grassa section “La

atement and

belongs todoes not affe

ive habitats

hese sensitihe red data

those trees

the trees toLand parcels

e incorporaPlan. and RDMRDs on the red

he red data td. The extraucted accordelling shouldy of lands aa special sta

nature only lant speciesnvironment cuthority and


experience n matting ov

ll address tmanent reins

l be introduc

se the potenrses; quiring small be left in pse of tempo

o the extent am areas; ansportation

g-term Anti-

ccupied by thtopsoil, veged for the higs vegetation

andscaping a

d Protection

strongly trect forestry f

and endang

ve zones pspecies pre

that are su

o be felled s from the F

ated into th

DI, based ond list speciestree speciesaction of thding to the rd be conduattributed to ate designati

if the Minists from the ncan be madRules of Op


significant ever the stock

the protectiostatement, ced as nece

ntial for eros

l volumes ofplace until trary erosion

practical;

n off the cons

-erosion Me

he road andetation covehway upgra

n cover as wand planting

n of Flora

ransformed fund land.

gered flora

prior to conesented with

bject for fell

needed to Forestry Land

e Construc

n the preentrs and accords remaining ue red data requirementucted in acc

the Forestrion, the plantry of Environature. The

de by the miperation of th


erosion Conkpiles.

on of “slopeare outline

essary, payin

ion from the

f sediment inhe slopes a

n control mea

struction site

easures

supporting er). So far aading, preserwell. Replanof greenery

urban lands

species, foll

struction stahin the zone

ing (to exclu

comply withd Fund.

ction Contra

ry survey dadingly refine under the imtree specie

ts of the Gecordance wry Fund.In cnt species innment make

e request fonistry envisa

he Governme


ntractor will

es” adjacentd in this ng special a

e slope sides

nterception;are stabilizedasures is to:

es.

facilities) shs very limitervation of to

nting of bushy”.

scape and

lowning acti

art up, in oand all tree

ude cutting

h the proce

act as part

ata, should athe route. In

mpact after thes from the orgian Law

with the proccase of builncluded on tes a decisionor obtainingaged by theent of Georg

rvision ) Road

134

institute

t to the section.

attention

s and/or

d to the

hould be ed bush p-soil is hes and

has no

ons are

order to es to be

of other

edure of

of the

apply all nventory he route

natural on Red cedures ding an the Red n on the such a

e Law of gia”.

Trees

Law othe boand foto comwithin

1.

2.

3.

The pbound

a)

b) c) d) 1.

2.

3.

The sregulaspeciedeterm 8.1.1.9 ConstThe paffectehollowoff bat

can be cut d

of Georgia “oundaries oorest fund grmpensate the

the boundaPrivatizatioand its envgreen planThe use oadmissiblethe categoforest fundestablishedConferringboundariespurposes (except orResourcesof Georgia

prohibited acdaries of Tbil

ConstructiodesignatedTree cuttinPlantation Issuing an

. Within therecreationaPresident o

. The decreGeorgia baEnvironme

. Within the be given athe project

tandards to ation, the nees to be grmined by the

9 Protection

truction Pharoject is noted by the co

w trees prior t colonies.

LoMod

down by obs

“On speciaof Tbilisi anrounds withine damage inries of Tbilison of the forvirons or thentations is prof the state e only for allory of a sped within the d by the legi

g the categos of Tbilisi is admissibl

re mining), ws, which is aa.

ctivities withlisi and its enon, except d areas; ng to gain the

business; exploitation

e administral zone withof Georgia. e envisagedased on theent of Georg

administratia status of ats, whose ma

use the areecessary reqrown on thee decree of t

n of Fauna

ase t expected t

onstruction isto their dem


serving the f

al protectionnd its environ the boundanflicted by dsi and its envrest fund aneir use in anrohibited exc

forest fundocation purp

ecial designaboundaries islation of Geory of a spand its env

le only for twith the rele

a part of the

h the state nvirons are a

for the al

e material tim

n permit for hration bounh a special

d by the firse applicationia. ion boundar special recain aim it is t

eas with thequirements fe areas as he Presiden

to have sigs bats. The

molishing or c


following rule

n of green ons” regulaaries of Tbil

damaging, devirons. nd forest funy other man

cept in casesd within theposes as weation, and thof Tbilisi aneorgia. ecial designvirons and the purposeevant decisiMinistry of P

forest fund as follows: llocation pu

mber, excep

hunting indusdaries of Tregulation

st clause of by Tbilisi M

ries of Tbilisicreational zoto protect th

e status of for improvinwell as the

nt of Georgia

gnificant impimpact can

cutting. A sim


es under the

plantationstes the procisi and its enestroy or dig

nd grounds nner, as wels envisaged boundariesell as when he deductionnd its enviro

nation to thits allotting

es envisagedon made byPower Engin

and state f

urposes or

pt dry, wither

stry. Tbilisi (exccan be esta

f this articleMayor, which

i (except theone with a spe green are

a special reng and builde boundarie

a.

pact on the Fbe mitigated

mple acoust


e law:

s and state cedure to pronvirons and gging out th

within the bl as changinby the pres

s of Tbilisi conferring thn of the arens is admiss

he state forefor special

d by the legy LEPL Ageneering and

forest fund

constructio

ring and rotte

cept the prablished by

is issued bh is agreed

e protected apecial regulaas and/or pl

ecreational zding the givees and area

Fauna. The d by checkinic method ca


forest fundotect the foredetermines e green pla

boundaries ong a categorent law. and its envhe state fore

eas out of thsible under

est fund wit forest exp

gislation of Gency of the Natural Res

grounds wit

n in the s

en trees;

rotected arethe decree

by the Preswith the Min

areas), an aation only toanting the a

zone with a en areas, tha of the are

only specieng old buildinan be used t

rvision ) Road

135

d within est fund the rule ntations

of Tbilisi ry of the

virons is est fund he state the rule

thin the loitation Georgia Natural

sources

thin the

specially

eas), a e of the

ident of nistry of

area can o realize reas.

special he plant eas are

es to be ngs and to scare

Pits, tthem –polyetanima Noise,worke The plvertebterritordescri 8.1.1.1Despitsites ainteres(althounecesthe Mithe peconduimportauthorSport territorwishinarcheoresearstudy, a thorousing identifarcheocondu At theensureMonumsuperv ChancChanc ConstsupervpracticCultur The Mperiodsensit ArchaeearthwBesideof any

renches and– i.e. large bhylene, etc.

als are able t

, emission rs should be

lants will be brate and invries in the imbed above s

10 Protectte the fact thare not locast, destructugh unlikelysary. Superinistry of Cuermit issuancting quarrtance as it rity based oof Georgia

ry to be cang to do theological reserch and labo the conclusough field stmodern me

fied objects aological resected under t

e constructioed by the ment Protecvision and o

ce Finds Proce Finds Pr

ruction Covisor) for cce is to agrreand Monum

Ministry of Cdical supervisive projects.

eological suworks (land ces that, archy chance find

LoMod

d similar shband of coloLong board

to get out. P

and dust me included in

covered witvertebrate spmmediate vicshould be im

tion of the chat the proje

ated near anion of archy). To avoidrvisory proceulture when nce. Accordirying activitimay be def

on the positi. The basisrried out by

e earth-workearch of the oratory worksion of the atudy of the a

ethodologiesand planningearch. Accothe detailed

on stage arconstructing

ction and Sther agreed

ocedure: rocedure:

ntractor enconducting dree the canment Protec

Culture and sion of cons

upervisor cclearance; ghaeological sding of poten


ould be limior distinctiveds or logs shits and trenc

minimization n the EMP as

h dust, whicpecies (əɛɥɨcinity (adjace

mplemented

cultural heriect footprint ny known suheological ld this risk, edures and obtaining thing to the aies in Georgfined under ve decision

s for the coy the entity ks is obligedterritory in q

ks. In case oarcheologicaarcheologica

s, (b) recomg of the builording to thdesign cont

rchaeologicag contractorSport of Ge

works shou

ngages 1 daily supervindidature of tion.

Monument struction wor

onducts darading; excasupervisor inntial archaeo


ited by som to the spechould be putches should

actions, ass mitigation

ch will impacɨɤɨɜ, Ɉɫɬɪɨent to) of the(watering; co

itage is mostly lim

ubterraneanayers durinarcheologicall other ne

he constructarticle 14 of gia, as well the legislatof the Mini

nclusion is wishing to

d to submit question. Thof identifyingl research s

al layers andmendations ding activitye establishetract at the s

al monitoringr under theorgia. Theld be fixed u

especially ision activitie

person ass

Protection mrks, although

aily monitoriavations etc.nstructs the ological relic


me barrier to cies, any flatt in pits and be checked

s well as pprocedures.

ct the feedingɨɭɦɨɜ 1985)e road. Dust overing fine

mited to the monument

ng the concal supervisecessary meion permit, ithe Law oas construc

ion of Georistry of Cultthe archeoaccomplish the Ministrye preliminar

g an archeolshould contad objects ide

about the py on the desied practice, stage of obta

g (“Chance e supervisioe budget neunder the co

dedicated es during thsigned for

may also ash this is prac

ing at all c.)are planneworkers to s.


prevent falt material fotrenches at prior to land

prevention o

g base and r); The impacminimizatiomaterials et

existing roas or areas struction pr

sion during easures shoin accordancn Cultural Hction of an rgia, is issueure, Monumlogical resethe ground

y the documry research slogical objec

ain the followentified on thproblem of cign territory,the archaeo

aining the Co

Finds Procon of the Mecessary fornstruction w

archaeologhe earthwork

that task w

ssign a perscticed only in

constructiond accordingreport him i


ling of animr small animt night so thad filling

of poaching

reproductionct is limited ton measurestc.)

ad and consof an archerocess is pthe earth-w

ould be agrece with the Heritage, Peobject of a ed by a com

ment Protectearch of thed works. Thmentation abshould includct on the terwing informahe study terrconservation on the basiological studonstruction P

cedure”) shoMinistry of r the arche

works apprais

ist (archaek operationswith the Min

son or compn exclusive c

n sites, whe to the schemmediately

rvision ) Road

136

mals into mals: tin, at small

by the

n of o the as

struction eological possible works is eed with rules of

ermit on special

mpetent tion and e proper e entity

bout the de field-rritory to tion: (a) ritory by n of the is of the dies are Permit.

ould be Culture,

eological sal.

eological s. Good nistry of

pany for cases of

ere the dule. in case

In cas 1. ConSuper 2. Arcat the site wh 3. In reportscase is 4. In SuperSpeciainform 5. ChstoppeMonum 6. Mincondu 7. In srequiredecisio 8. In Monumthe arc 8.1.1.1 Duringexistinthese constrsystemlist of t2.9 “U Reloca

-

-

-

-

e of finding

nstruction worvisor.

haeological site of find

here finding

case the fins to the Chs made in re

case if thervisor reportalist (and su

m the Ministry

ief Engineeed oerationsment Protec

nistry of Cuct necessary

simpler caseed works, ton on recom

exclusive cament Protecchaeologica

11 Protect

g the mobilizng transmissinfrastructur

ruction activms, which arthe utilities atility Relocat

ation, replacThe contrainfrastructuBefore anyproposed wthe area. The Contrsewers, suwater mainThe ContrAuthority, telephone

LoMod

any artefact

orkers are o

supervisor ing. Archaewas made

nding has nhief Engineeecord book.

e finding is ts to Chief Epervising coy of Culture

r of the Cos and requ

ction.

lture and My arcaeolog

s, after remothe experts

mmencemen

ases of valuction may issl site.

tion of the In

zation and psion lines, waral systems ities. Permare not removand infrastrution”.

cement and actor is respure located wy constructiowork area an

ractor shall urface waterns, before stractor shall the movinglines, water


s of potentia

obliged to sto

reports to thological sup

no potential er and the w

estimated Engineer of tompany / Enand Monum

onstruction Cuesting imm

Monument Pical works at

oval of the mof the Min

t of stopped

uable and ssue request

nfrastructu

preconstructiater supply pshould be u

anent monitoved. All the

ucture to be

rerouting of ponsible for within the puon is begun nd request t

establish tr drains, cabtarting any e

be respong of or altemains, sew


al archaeolog

op works an

he Chief Engpervisor exe

archaeologworks are re

as potentiathe Construcgineer) requ

ment Protectio

Contractor amediate eng

Protection wt the site to

movable artifistry of Cul constructio

spatially sprto relocate t

ral Element

on stage reqpipelines andninterrupted

oring is requdamaged srelocated or

all utilities loworking clo

ublic right-of-the Contrachat they ma

the positionbles for elecexcavation ornsible for aerations to

wers and surf


gical value,

nd immediate

gineer at sitecutes first c

gical value, estarted. Ap

l archaeoloction Contracuesting to stoon about the

also reportsagement of

ill assign exidentify the p

facts, fixing ture and Mn works.

read findingthe RoW sh

ts

quired activid local gas p

dly functionauired to avoiystems shour affected sp

ocated on thosely with an-way. ctor shall nork the locatio

n of existingctricity and ter other workarranging in

services sface water d


following ste

ely report to

e and requechecking of

the Archaeppropriate re

gical relic, ctor and to Mop constructe incident.

s to MDF inf the Minist

xpert or groproblem.

materials anMonument P

s, the Minisifting it on a

ities are planpipelines to l during andid damage ould be reins

pecifically is

e Project: ny utility co

otify the utiliton of any ty

g services elephones,

k likely to damn liaison wiuch as pip

drains which


eps are take

o the Archae

ests to stop athe finding

ological Supecord regard

the ArchaeMDF Environtion activities

nforming abtry of Cultu

oup of expe

nd conductinrotection wi

stry of Cultua safe distan

nned to remthe safe site

d after compof the infras

stated.The co provided in

mpany havi

ty companiepes of equip

such as pioverhead linmage them.th the app

pelines, pow are affected

rvision ) Road

137

en:

eological

activites and the

pervisor ding the

eological nmental s and to

bout the ure and

erts and

ng other ill issue

ure and nce from

move the es. All of letion of

structure omplete section

ng their

s of the pment in

pelines, nes and

propriate wer and d by the

-

-

-

The afThe moperatbeen designtechni The oconsudesignstakehmade within 8.1.1

It is requi

instructo inst

Road vehshouldequippnight. Roadmoveralshould Alternawill be The Csafety 8.1.1.1 In ordpremisthese Const

Works. ThagreementThe Contrconstructiothey shall complete rShould theshall be thIf any utilitsubmit to constructioproposed dused, togcompany'smaterials tcompany s

ffected infrasmain infrastted by BP. Selaborated

n complies cal decision

other affecteltation with

n plan for eholders. Saffor few metethe low sen

.12 Health

red to obserctions whilst ruct the staf

hicles shall hd be in goodped with red

men shall bel safety mea

d ensure spe

ate access e employed.

Contractor is requiremen

13 Complex

der to efficieses to be de

facilities. Druction Cont

LoMod

he arrangemt of the Engiractor is reson and shallbe allowed

repair workse utility compe responsibty equipmenthe Engine

on limits in duration of tether with

s specificatioto be left inshall be notifstructure anructure to bSpecial desiby BP andinternationa

ed infrastructhe listed o

each particulfety and envers, within thsitivity envir

h and Safety

rve safety mperforming

ff on safety m

have small tu operating c signals of e

e provided wasures suchecial shelter

will be prov

s responsiblnts as well as

x of Ancillar

ently organizesigned and Design andtractor. Acc


ments for sneer and thesponsible fo repair thema free use o. pany chose ility of the Cont is encouneer for appr

writing. Ththe works, pany requir

on and detan place. Aftfied to insped the ownerbe crossed ign for cross Detailed D

al safety an

cture elemewners, the lar infrastrucvironmental he same envronmental zo

y

measures, indthe works, a

measures pr

urning radiusconditions. Pemergency s

with special uh as fencingfor protectin

vided for veh

e to performs industrial s

ry Facilities

ze the workbuilt by the location oordingly, the


such movine appropriator any and m with his eqof his equipm

to repair theontractor.

ntered in theroval his pris proposal

plans and dered certificaails of proteter the utilityect the work rs are listed

is the intesing the RoWDesign contrd engineeri

ents are of DD Contraccture systemissues hav

vironment. Aones.

dustrial sanitas well as torior to the co

s, equipped Parking placestop during t

uniforms and of work site

ng workers f

hicles and p

m the workssanitation re

s (Concrete

s, it is nececontractor. T

of these face present IEE


ng or alterate Authority.

all damagequipment orment and pe

e damaged u

e proposed roposal to r shall incluetails of a n

ation that thection methy has beenprior to comin p. 2.9 . ernational mW of the meractor in cloing standard

local signictor has elabm. Agreemeve been conAll these infra

tation and firo train the staommenceme

with sound e shall be fenhe day and w

d special fooe, various srom unfavor

pedestrians.

s in accordaquirements.

Plant, Cam

essary to buThe current cilities is wE is not cove


ation shall

e caused tor, if the utilityersonnel as

utility themse

work area trelocate thede, but notew utility rouhe materialods to be u rerouted th

mmencing the

mainline oil entioned straose collabords and BP

ficance andborated spe

ent has beensidered, asastructure el

re precautioaff. The Conent of works.

signals and nced with bawith red sign

otwear. It is safety activitrable weathe

Appropriate

ance with la

mp, Vehicke

uild the auxproject desig

within the cering project


be subject

o any utilityy company drequired in o

elves costs i

the Contracte utility outst be limitedute, material meets theused for anhe interestee backfill ope

and gas pategic pipelinration. The has accept

d less compecific relocatn achieved all relocatiolements are

n measures ntractor is req

light signalsarriers and nal floodlight

required to oies. The Coer conditions

e lighting an

abor protect

Fleet)

xiliary buildingn does not

competence t-specific m

rvision ) Road

138

to the

y during desires, order to

incurred

tor shall side the d to the als to be e utility

ny utility ed utility eration.

pipelines nes has specific ted this

plex. In tion and with all

ons are located

and quired

s which

t at

observe ontractor s.

nd signs

ion and

ngs and t include

of the itigation

measumitiga The dechose requireother ConstMoe. In lineare nocomplundert

The coThe pthe suonTbilTo minon crit

The W The caWhen pipe oundergneces A resegravity The wvia a c The wtreatmwatersand sldisinfepropos

ures in that tion measur

ecision rega to use exement to beoption is tharuction Cont

e with the legot subject ty with certataken under x Resolu

of issuax Decree

2009 “accom

x DecreeSustaindocumconstru

x SNiP2.x SNiP2.x SNiP2.x SNiP2.x Decree

Georgi

omplex of auropose traff

ubproject (seis-Phonichanimize thesetical sites are

Worker’s Ca

amp has an building the

or pit well caground watesary for this

erve reservoy.

waste waterscommon coll

waste watersment. A techns. A septic iudge minera

ected and dised site for

LoMod

respect, butres, as well

arding the coxisting supple met is that at Contractotractor is ob

gislation of Gto the envirin standardsthe followin

ution No. 57 ance of a bue No. 1-1/12“Relating thmodation of

e No. 1-1/2nable Develents of te

uction on the.07.01.–89 U.08.02.–89 .09.03.–85 .09.04.–87 Ae No. 745 ofa of Novem

uxiliary buildfic managemection 1 and

ala and Phone risks we pre carried out

mp

office, livinge living cam

an be made er. In line wipurpose.

oir will be a

s will be collelector from t

s will be ponically relatis a premisealization takischarged incamps is lo


t provides onas standard

oncrete planliers of the only license

or decides tobliged to be

Georgia, theronmental ps and regulag normativeof the Gove

uilding perm254 of the Me approval f the territorie251 of Febopment of Gchnical rege territory of Urban plannPublic buildiPremises of

Administrativf the Ministeber 13, 2008

dings includement schemed section 3)nichala-Rustropose to spt at one sect

g, domestic amp, drinking

on the selecth the effect

arranged on

ected in thehe camp are

lluted with ovely simple

e, where theke place at thnto the surfaocated far fro


nly generic rds applicable

t will be takeconcrete o

ed suppliers o install his compliant w

e other facilitpermit. Howations. Desige documentsernment of Git and terms inister of Ecof the prin

es with settleruary 18, 2Georgia “Ongulation in Georgia effeing ings and pref the industrive and domeer of Environ8 “On the tec

es a living cae solves the). However, tavi subsecti

plit constructtion at the sa

and cateringand domes

cted territorytive legislatio

the territory

sewage sysea.

organic subpremise, a

e mechanicahe same tim

ace water facom the r. M


recommende for the proj

en by the Cooperating inhaving all rown concre

with the Tec

ties (construever, the Cgning and ths effective in Georgia of Mof permit”.

conomic Devncipal provisements”. 2010 of then the use of

the field oective before

emises al enterprise

estic buildingnment Protecchnical envir

amp, fleet ane traffic disru

the simultaions may creion scheduleame time.

g units. stic water-suy and the caon, an unde

y supplying

stem on the

stances andseptic is to

al and biologme. After thecility or envi

Mtkvari and d


ations on leect.

onstruction C the region

required permete plant. In chnical Regu

uction campsConstruction he selection

Georgia: March 24, 2

velopment osions to reg

e Minister of the norms,of technicae 1992”.

es gs. ction and Naronmental re

nd concrete uption problneous execeate additiones in a way t

upply shouldamp can be erground wa

the camp u

e camp territ

d therefore be provided

gical treatmee septic, the ironment (drdischarge co


gal procedu

Contractor. n. In this camits are usethis later ca

ulations ado

s. vehicle fleContractor

of territory m

009 “About

of Georgia ofgulate the u

of Economi, rules and o

al supervisio

atural Resouegulation”

plant. ems within

cution of civnal traffic prothat intensiv

d be considsupplied wi

ter intake lic

units with w

tory and disc

will need bid to treat theent of wastewaste wate

ry gorges etould be arra

rvision ) Road

139

ures and

He may ase the ed. The ase, the

opted by

eet etc.) has to

must be

the rule

f July 8, use and

ics and other of on and

urces of

each of il works oblems.

ve works

ered. A th fresh

cense is

water by

charged

iological e waste

e waters r will be c.). The

anged in

dry godevelothe Su A wasremovThe reunit:

Vehic The fle The tain partor rublocal sthe coharmle In ordthe ter There therefoThe am

whereF is thH is thK is thAccord When into ac

- -

- -

orge. Howevop, if requesurface Water

ste containeved from the equirements

x Georgix Georgix Georgix Decree

Georgix Constr

and sex Constr

and wax Constr

pipelinex Constr

technicx Constr

treatme

le Fleet Dep

eet includes

anks to colleticular the mber parts; th

services. Plaontractor willess.

er to avoid rritory of the

is a risk ofore, the oil pmount of sto

Q=10 u Fue Q is the vole area of the

he amount ofhe coefficientding to the v

building theccount:

Georgian LBuilding Nplants” SNiP 2.11Decree No8, 2008 “complexes

LoMod

ver, the Costed by Moer Bodies”.

r for domescamp site uof the follow

an Law “Onan Law “Onan Law “On

e No. 745 ofa of Novem

ruction Reguewerage outeruction Reguater-supply oruction Rege and sewer

ruction Regcal systems”ruction Norment plants”.

pot

a car park a

ct the brokemetal boxes fhe given remastic reservol be made re

the expectefleet will be

f the storm products retaorm waters isuH u K lume of store territory, hf precipitatiot, which dep

volume of sto

e unit, the re

Law “On watorm 496-77

.04.–85 – “Uo. 1-1/2935 o“On gas fils”.


onstruction Ce, the norma

stic waste wunder the agwing normat

water”; ore deposit permits andf the Ministeber 13, 2008ulation Stander networks ulation Stanof settled aregulation Starage norms”ulation Stan”

m 496–77 “T

and repair bo

en-down car for oily parts

mains will beoirs will be pesponsible f

ed risk of po flattened an

waters pollaining unit fos calculated

m water, m3

a ons, mm andpends on theorm waters,

equirements

ter” “Temporal i

Undergroundof the Ministling stations


Consultant wative docum

will be placedreement conive documen

ts” d licensing” er of Environ8 “On the tecdards Buildiand premisedards Buildeas” andards Bu ndards Buil

Temporal ins

oxes for con

parts will bes, reservoirse removed fplaced for usfor their rem

llution of thend a storm w

ution with sor the collect

by the follow

3/day (m3/yea

d is taken froe type of the the treatme

s of the follo

instruction to

d reservoirs ter of Econos and appr


will agree dent “Admiss

d on the cancluded withnts must be

nment Protecchnical enviring Code (Mes” ing Code 2

ilding Code

lding Code

struction to d

nstruction tec

e placed on ts for amortizfrom the terrsed oils and

moval from th

e soil or watwater collecti

suspended mted storm wawing formula

ar)

om the existicover. nt plant calc

owing norma

o design the

for oil, oil promic Develoroving the


discharge msible Maximu

mp territoryh local servicconsidered

ction and Naronmental re

MTS 07.01-0

.1.4. 000 –

e 2.04.01–8

3.0.01–85

design the s

chniques.

the territory ed tires andritory under other oil pro

he territory a

ter reservoirion system w

materials anaters will be a:

ng literary s

culations will

ative docume

e surface wa

roducts and pment of Gerules of sa


ode with Mum Discharg

. The wasteces. when arrang

atural Resouegulation” 09) - “Water

00 “Drinkin

85 “Interna

“Internal s

surface wast

of the repaird other polyethe agreemeoduct residuand renderin

rs with oil prwill be provid

nd oil produprovided.

ources

be made.

ents must b

aste water tre

liquid air” eorgia of Deafety of ga

rvision ) Road

140

MoE and ges into

e will be

ging the

urces of

r supply

g water

l water

sanitary-

te water

r boxes, ethylene ent with

ues, and ng them

roducts, ded.

cts and

be taken

eatment

ecember s filling

Select

In ordcarefu The sresponpopula

tion of terri

er to ensureully.

selection ofnsibility, but ation must b

LoMod

tories

e the efficie

f the locatithe interact

e considere


ent work org

on and siztion betweend.


ganization, th

ze of a can the constr


he sites for

amp is the ruction staff


the camps

contractor’and the env


are to be s

’s prerogativironment a

rvision ) Road

141

selected

ve and nd local

IEE

su

r Rep

ort

r.

8.6

P

rop

os

e

ed

Ca

mp

Sit

e

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n oe

me

nt,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

dMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rdepe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 14

2

Wasteprovid The fo

x x x x x x x

The anumbeaccepfrom tinstallathis wmunic Oil cothe placollectproces WoodeThe mcollecaccor 8.1.1.1 Commrequirepresen The CenviroEMP) The ofconstrOffset Plan). Only used.TCheckprojecthe coobtainplants Envirowith th

e Managemde brief sum

ollowing cateHouseholdOffice wasPackagingOil contamOil contamPolymer wMedical wa

mount of hoer. Accordinted norm, 0the above, tation of closaste and disipal cleaning

ntaminated ant in accordtion passed ssing/dispos

en packaginmanagemenction, storardance with

14 Resume

mitment of ements desnt EIA or onl

Constructingonmental iss

with further

ffset tree plaructing contr tree plantiThe final ve

legally regThis is relev

king of comct may haveonstructing ed from the to produce

onmental Imhe Technical

LoMod

ment Plan fommary.

egories of wad waste; ste (paper, cag (wood, papminated clothminated soil; waste; aste.

ousehold wag to the pre

0.70 m3 of hthe amount sed containesposal at thg service.

mass as wedance with eto the orga

sal/treatment

ng material snt of waste pge, passingthe princip

e

Constructicribed in thly EMP coul

g Contractosues and prdescription

anting projecractor and reng Plan sho

ersion of the

gistered suvant to the pliance with

e influence acompany dMoE. The c

e concrete fopact Permitl Regulation


or Constru

aste are exp

artridges, buper, etc.); hes, filters, a

aste produceeliminary dathousehold wof househo

ers is plannee grounds w

ell as other environmentanization witt.

shall be passproduced ag and trans

ples, proced

on Contrace present Ed be attache

r is obligedroduce Contof details (s

ct (if requireelevant costsould be incplan should

uppliers haborrow pit

h the permiand mitigate decides to econstructing or their ope is not requs.


uction Cam

pected during

ulbs, etc.);

bsorption pi

ed during plta, up to 200

waste is prodld waste peed for houswill be condu

hazardous wtal and hygieth appropria

sed to the loat the objecsportation) dures and ru

ctor to adEIA should bed as annex

d to assigntractor’s Imchedule, inv

ed and as res should be cluded in thed be agreed

aving all reoperators, at and licensimpacts rela

explore borcontractor mrations. In t

uired, howev


p is given

g object exp

llows;

lant function0 people shduced per eer year will behold wasteucted on the

waste shall enic requiremate environm

cal populatioct (classifica

and monitules describ

dhere the be incorpora

x and essent

n environmeplementation

volved perso

equested by reflected in te final EMPwith the Roa

equired peas well as tse requiremated to the srow pits, apmay take dehat case sp

ver the contr


in annex 6

ploitation:

ning is connhall be emploemployee anbe: 0.70 X 2e at the objee basis of th

be temporaments and p

mental impac

on for furtheation, inventoring shallbed in Anne

environmeated into theial part of th

ental specian Plan (bas

onnel, require

MoE) shouthe overall c

P (Contractoad Departme

ermits and o the other

ments is the suppliers’ opppropriate lcision to ins

pecial EIA aractor shoul


6. Here be

ected with toyed. Follownnually. Pro200 = 140 mect. The remhe contract w

arily allocateproceeding fct permit for

er re-use. ntory, segrel be conduex 7

ental manae contract (e contract).

alist for mased on the ed resources

ld be elaborconstruction or’s Implemeent

licenses material suonly way t

perations. Inicenses sho

stall concretend obtainingd be in com

rvision ) Road

143

low we

the staff wing the ceeding m3. The

moval of with the

d within from the r further

egation, cted in

agement e.g. the

anaging present s etc.).

rated by budget. entation

will be uppliers. that the n case if ould be e mixing g of the

mpliance

8.1.2 M Here wof theDepar ErosiopermacomplCorrecimplem Roadsinstitutsuppo Air emincorpimplem Landsentire properscreen PrevetranspprepaEmergplans but no

The aGeorgChemRegula08.08. PreveThe C(NCDCthe Miand pl 8.2 Mo

Institu 223. Cto meteam, prescr

Mitigation o

we would mese measurrtment utilizin

on and lananent erosioetion of coctive actionmentation of

side litter ations and p

orting facilitie

missions, nporation of mentation.

scaping andlength of h

r landscapinning aspects

ention and port, that m

aredness. Rgency Situatregulating t

ot limited to: - Des

dam- Des- Reg- Pro

bovementiongia on Hazaicals in the ations of oth.1995 as am

ention of ProCustoms SeC) and the “inistry of theant disease

onitoring an

tional Frame

Construction et this obligwho is ab

ribed mitigat

LoMod

of Long-ter

mention the mres (predomng funds fro

nd stabilityon and landonstruction ws include, f anti-erosion

and fuel poprivate com

es and servic

oise and poenvironmen

d planting highway RDng and greens should be t

mitigationmay result iRDMRDI in c

tions) shoultransportatio

sign and immages from signate specgulation of t

ohibition of toned measurardous SubEnvironmenher countrie

mended in 19

oliferation oervices, the National Se

e Agricultures due to tran

nd enforcem

ework for EM

contractor igation, a cole to fully ution measure


rm and Ope

mitigation meminantly mam the state

y control d stability coworks, as wbut are non measures

ollution.RDMmpanies andces (fueling

ollution durntal conside

of greenerDMRDI shounery plantingtaken into co

n of accidein spills of conjunction wld facilitate

on of hazard

mplement saaccidental scial routes foransport of toxic waste trres and planstances and

nt and Ruleses (e.g. Orde999) could be

of Human, ANational Cervice for the

e are responnsportation o

ment

MP Impleme

s obligated tontractor shaunderstand es to the con


ration Relat

easures to bintenance wbudget, lawn

and landscontrol and well as timet limited to(berms, veg

MRDI should facilitate stations, wa

ring the maerations in

ry. In a longuld plan devg strategiesonsideration

ent risks toxic mate

with the Mindevelopmen

dous materia

afety measuspills. or hazardoustoxic materiaransport thro

ns should bed Regulatio

s of Transpoer of the Mie used as su

Animal and enter for th

e Foodstuffs nsible entitieof people an

entation

to follow EMall have at recommend

ntractor’s da


ted Impacts

be implemenworks) shouns, grants an

caping.Roamonitoring ely impleme

o maintenangetation cove

ld coordinatarrangemen

aste manage

aintenance the mainte

g-term perspvelopment o. Visual and.

associated erials injurienistry of Intent of legislaals. The sys

ures and a

s materials tals to minimiough ecologe elaboratedons of the ortation, Stornister of Traupporting ma

Plant Diseae Disease Safety, Vetes to prevent

nd goods.

MP and goodleast one edations of E

aily operation


s

nted at operuld be implnd other fina

ad Departmeof landscapentation of nce of drainer etc.) when

e with the lnt and propement servic

works.RDMnance cont

pective and of the roads

d aesthetic, a

with vehes or loss erior (Departation and emstem of mea

an emergen

transport. ze danger.

gically sensit in accordanMoE on “Nrage and Usansport of Raterials.

ases. Control anderinary and t proliferatio

d constructioenvironmentaEMP and pns.


rational stagemented by

ancial source

ent should pe restoratio

corrective nage systemnever require

local Governper functiones)

MRDI shouldtracts and

in relation wside zone aas well as e

icular traffof life Emetment for Mamergency reasures may

cy plan to

ive areas. nce with the

Norms of Ussage of CheRussia # 73

d Medical SPlant Protecn of human,

n practice. al specialistprofessionall

rvision ) Road

144

ge. Most y Road es.

ensure on after actions. ms and ed.

nmental nality of

d ensure monitor

with the applying emission

fic and ergency anaging esponse

include

contain

e Law of sage of micals”. issued

Statistics ction” of , animal

In order t on the y apply

Technpresenconsisimplemwell aworks MDF pqualityADB, superv

Repor

224. Creportsactivitiare reenvirocommsuperv 225. Tenviroreportsthe facevaluahighligcontra 226. Msupervarrivalsemesconstractionissues

Reme

227. Mcontrainfringgiven satisfaperiodthe ofirreverthe co Institu

14Tech(CMC)

nical supervince in the Pstency with tmentation ofas identify a.

provides a gy performanc

ensures avision of the

rting on EM

Contractor, ts on the EMies carried oequired for

onmental isunities, etcvisor and MD

Technical suonmental pers and carry ctual informate adequacght any casactor or reve

MDF must visor are ma in MDF adm

ster (1 reporuction works taken for f

s at any time

edies for EM

MDF, as a cactor with thements, an 48 hours to

actorily durind, MDF will affending conrsible damag

ost for restora

utional Cap

nical supervis

LoMod

sor14 of worroject area athe design af EMP by theany unexpec

general overce of the tecvailability oProject by t

MP Impleme

hrough the eMP implemenout within the

carrying ossues emer. ContractoDF.

upervisor prerformance oanalysis of ation providcy of mitigates of incomaled by supe

ensure thaade availableministration. rt per 6 mos. Such repfixing of suc

e, independe

MP Violation

client of conhe terms oincident wh

o remedy theng this perioarrange for antractor’s nege, there wilation activitie

acity of MD

sor is part of t


rks commissand keep a cand ensuringe contractorcted environ

rsight on thechnical supe

of all envirothe ADB.

ntation

environmentntation. Suce reporting pout such arged in reor’s monthly

epares montof the contractheir contened in the cotion measur

mpliance witervisor hims

at monthly e for the env The MDF,

onths) to thporting shallch cases. Mently from the

n

nstruction wof the contrich causes te problem aod, no furtheanother context paymenl be a finances.

DF

the consulting


sioned by Mclose eye ong quality of wr, reveal anynmental issu

e environmeervisor and onmental in

tal specialistch reports mperiod, statuactivities, elations wity status rep

thly reports ctor. These

nts. Technicontractor’s reres applied th EMPs, inself, and prop

reports fromvironmental through its ee ADB on t contain info

MDF shall ine schedule o

works, will bract, includitemporary buand to restoer actions wractor to do t. For maj

cial penalty u

g service for c


MDF is respon the courseworks, the s

y deviations ues should

ntal compliaof the contrnformation,

t on the teammust carry in

s of any clemitigation

th suppliersports shall

on the statue reports shacal supervisoeports, fill anby contracto

nform on anpose correct

m the contrspecialists oenvironmentthe status oormation on form the ADof regular re

e responsibng adherenut reversiblere the envir

will be takenthe restor

jor infringemup to 1% of

construction m


onsible to ese of works. Asupervisor isfrom the prethey emerg

ance of workactor. MDFaand facilita

m, shall prepnformation oarances/permeasures

s, local aube submitte

us of EMP iall be basedor shall asseny gaps ideor. Technic

ny acute isstive actions.

ractor and of the MDF tal specialist

of environmeall violation

DB on any mporting.

ble for enfornce to the e damage, thronment. If n. If it is noration, and dments, causthe contract

management


stablish stroAlong with es mandated escribed actge at any s

ks through ealso liaises wates environ

pare monthlyn the main trmits/license

applied, authorities, aed to the te

mplementat on the cont

ess how accntified in thecal supervisues brough

from the tepromptly upts, shall repoental complins identified major environ

rcing compliEMP. Fo

he contractorestoration ot done dur

deduct the cosing a long-t value in add

to be hired by

rvision ) Road

145

ong field ensuring to track ions, as

stage of

ensuring with the nmental

y status types of

es which nd any affected echnical

tion and tractor’s curate is em, and or must t up by

echnical pon their ort each ance of and the nmental

ance of r minor

or will be is done

ring this ost from -term or dition to

y MDF

228. Mthe reprocedmonitoenviroengineRoad supervFor thand mrespon 8.3 Co 229. Tthe co Additioneed Cultur Some the EIA In casbe fac

The penviroRelate Trainin

MDF structureview of thdures. Besioring. The p

onmental coeering superDepartmen

visor and mais purpose,

monitoring gnsible for the

osts of Impl

The costs ofontract for co

onal archaefor financin

re and Monu

not significaA and EMP

se if the red-cilitated with

permanent onmental aned costs are

ngs for MDF

LoMod

re includes ahe environmdes, MDF

present instiompliance wrvisor will bet has to haake decisionit is necessroup to mase resettleme

lementation

f environmeonstruction.

ological studg these stu

ument Protec

ant expenseand will be b

-data tree spthe proportio

expensesd H&S specapproximate

F Enviromen


an environmmental docu

has a motutional cap

within the lime charged wave proper ns to solve thary to organster ADB sa

ent issues.

n

ental activitie

dies may beudies shouldction.

s are foreseborne by the

pecies are don of 1:10, s

s during cocialists (In Cely 60,000 G

tal Specialis


mental speciauments andnitoring gro

pacity of MDmits of the

with the dailystaff to sup

he problemsnize the trainafety proced

es associate

e required fod be consid

een with respe MDF.

amaged, coso 10 trees s

onstruction CMC budgeGel annually

st – 7000 GE


alist, who is d accomplisoup with thDF is to be f

Project. Dy control ovepervise the s brought upnings for thedures, and h

ed with the c

or obtainingdered and n

pect to the fo

ompensatoryshould be pl

are associet, under the.

EL


responsible shment of he function further extenespite the er the perfoperformanc

p before MDFe MDF envirhire one mo

construction

g Constructionegotiated w

ollowing pub

y planting of anted instea

iated with e overall su


for the contthe environof impleme

nded to ensfact that thrmance quace of the teF by the supronmental spore specialis

will be incl

on Permit. Pwith the Min

blic consultat

the speciesad of 1 cut tr

the need pervision co

rvision ) Road

146

trol over nmental entation sure the he work ality, the echnical pervisor. pecialist st to be

uded in

Possible nistry of

tion on

s should ree.

to hire ontract).

Imp

Des

lan

veg

hab

Rig

hig

Act

top

exc

Des

lan

veg

hab

acc

pit

co

neq

u

IEE

Rep

ort

8.4

E

nv

iro

Mit

igati

on

M

pacts

stru

ctio

n of

ds

cape

(re

lief,

sge

tatio

n,

eco

bita

ts

and

wild

lifgh

t-of-W

ay o

ccup

hway

.

tiviti

es:

land

ps

oil

strip

ping

cava

tions

stru

ctio

n of

ds

cape

(re

lief,

sge

tatio

n,

eco

bita

ts a

nd w

ildlif

cess

roa

ds,

in t

hsi

tes,

w

aste

n

str

ucti

on

cam

uip

men

t yard

s. o

nm

en

tal M

an

a

Me

asu

res

to

be

Sit

e

natu

ral

soil

cove

r, o-

syst

ems,

fe

) in

th

e pi

ed b

y th

e

clea

ranc

e,

g an

d

Who

to b

natu

ral

soil

cove

r, o-

syst

ems,

fe

) on

the

he

bo

rro

w

du

mp

s,

mp

s

and

Ca m

Qua

(e.g

Was

con

equ

ag

em

en

t P

lan

Imp

lem

en

ted

D

es

ole

alig

nmen

t of

be w

iden

ed

mp

site

;

arry

site

s;

g. m

tkva

ri flo

odpl

a

ste

dst

ruct

ion

cam

psui

pmen

t yar

ds.

Du

rin

g t

he C

on

Mit

iga

f ro

ad

Pre

-ent

ryfa

una

wi

clea

ranc

insp

ectio

Stic

ks w

esca

ping

Pro

per

tbe

low

, wus

ed fo

r C

ompe

nsp

ecie

s of

1:1

0;

with

ratio

ain)

.

umps

, s

and

Pre

-ent

r ypr

even

tin In

ca

sepr

otec

ted

will

be p

Stic

ks w

nstr

ucti

on

Ph

a

ati

on

Mea

su

res/

y su

rvey

fo

r p

ill b

e co

nduc

ted

pce

(in

spec

tion

on o

f nes

ts in

RoW

will

be in

stal

led

ing

smal

l mam

mal

s

top-

soil

stor

age

will

be a

pplie

d an

rein

stat

emen

t an

nsat

ory

plan

ting

shou

ld b

e fa

cilit

aR

epla

ntin

g of

ot

o 1:

1

y su

rvey

w

ill

ng d

amag

e to

flo

e of

un

avoi

dabl

ed

spec

ies

of f

lor

lann

ed a

nd e

xecu

will

be in

stal

led

in

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

se

/Co

sts

prev

entin

g da

ma

prio

r to

sta

rt up

oof

ba

t liv

ing

W)

n pi

ts a

nd t

renc

hs.

prac

tice,

as

des

d st

ored

tops

oil w

nd la

ndsc

apin

g;

of t

he r

ed d

ata

ated

with

the

prop

ther

tre

es a

s m

in

be

cond

ucte

dra

and

faun

a;

e im

pact

on

ra

ra,

repl

antin

g pr

out

ed;

n pi

ts a

nd t

renc

h: E

ng

ine

erin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

Tim

efr

a

age

to

of la

nd

site

s;

hes

for

scrib

ed

will

be

a tre

e po

rtion

ni

mum

prio

r to

sup

of l

ancl

eara

nc E

xcav

atpe

riod

From

cl

eara

nctil

l re

inst

ate

Dev

elop

plan

ting

befo

re

cons

truc

star

t up.

impl

eme

befo

re

com

plet

d fo

r

are

or

ogra

m

hes

for

prio

r to

sup

of l

ancl

eara

nc E

xcav

a tpe

riod

From

em

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

am

eR

esp

on

for

Imp

lem

star

t nd

ce

tion la

nd

ce

–

emen

t

p pl

an

ctio

n . en

t

ion

Con

stru

Con

trac

star

t nd

ce

tion la

nd

Con

stru

com

pan

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

nsib

ilit

y

en

tati

on

Re

sp

for

M

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C In

spe

MoE

ctin

g y.

M

DF

CM

C In

spe

MoE

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 14

7

on

sib

ilit

y

on

ito

rin

g

ctor

ate

of

ctor

ate

of

Ero

roa

tem

nat

Er o

roa

con

cov

Inc

sed

by

site

and

wat

sed

Top

IEE

Rep

ort

osio

n st

imul

ated

ad

cu

ts

and

mpo

rary

se

dim

entu

ral d

rain

age

wa

osio

n of

la

nds

ad

bed

ncen

trate

d ou

tfve

red

or o

pen

dra

reas

ed

sdi

men

t in

stre

amer

osio

n at

co

es a

nd f

resh

roa

dd

was

te

dum

ps.

ter

qual

ity

and

dim

enta

tion

psoi

l lo

sses

from

fre

sh

fills

an

d nt

atio

n of

ys

.

belo

w

the

rece

ivin

g flo

w

from

ai

ns.

Alo

nof

th

susp

ende

d m

s af

fect

ed

onst

ruct

ion

d cu

ts,

fills

.

Dec

lined

in

crea

sed

Su b

r. M

due

to

Who

ng t

he w

hole

she

road

bsec

tions

clo

se t

Mtk

vari

ole

alig

nmen

t:

esca

ping

Pro

per

tbe

low

, wus

ed fo

r La

ndsc

aim

plem

eec

tion

Per

man

em

easu

reD

etai

led

biom

attin

For

mit

follo

win

g-

Lim

ita-

Pro

tew

ith m

- P

rote

stra

w-

Inst

alFo

r m

itm

easu

r e-

App

row

ill b

- D

rain

casc

a-

Pro

vibe

mW

ater

r

ston

es, c

to t

he

Mit

iga

impl

emm

eas

sedi

m-

Pro

te-

Est

abse

dim

the

The

Con

g sm

all m

amm

als

top-

soil

stor

age

will

be a

pplie

d an

rein

stat

emen

t an

apin

g pl

an

will

ente

d;

ent

and

tem

es w

ill b

e im

plem

Des

ign

(tng

or g

eo -t

extil

e tig

atio

n of

se

dg

mea

sure

s w

ill b

atio

n of

ear

th m

ovec

tion

of m

ost

sum

ulch

. ec

tion

of d

rain

age

w o

r fab

ric b

arrie

rslla

tion

of s

edim

enig

atio

n of

in

duc

es w

ill b

e im

plem

eop

riate

siz

ed r

ain

e co

nstru

cted

. n

outle

ts

desi

gnad

e ef

fect

. si

on f

or c

ross

dad

e.

rece

ivin

g su

rfac

conc

rete

. ati

on

str

ate

gy:

men

ting

tem

ures

– t

empo

rar

men

t cat

chm

ents

eec

t sus

cept

ible

su

blis

hmen

t of

ret

em

ent l

oads

bef

ore

ntra

ctor

sha

ll

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

s prac

tice,

as

des

d st

ored

tops

oil w

nd la

ndsc

apin

g;

be

deve

lope

d

mpo

rary

an

ti-e

men

ted

acco

rdin

g em

pora

ry

dra

cove

r, be

rms

etc

dim

enta

tion

i

e im

plem

ente

d:

ving

to d

ry p

erio

dus

cept

ible

soi

l su

e ch

anne

ls w

ith b

s.

ntat

ion

basi

ns

ced

eros

ion

fol

ente

d:

n-st

orm

-wat

er c

ha

ned

so

as

to

drai

nage

stru

ctur

e

es

to

be

lined

pr

even

tion

thpo

rary

an

ti-e

ry d

rain

age,

tem

etc.

ur

face

s w

ith r

fabr

entio

n po

nds

to r

e w

ater

ent

ers

str:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

scrib

ed

will

be

d an

d

clea

ranc

till

rein

stat

e A

fter

com

plet

civi

l wo r

eros

ion

to th

e ai

nage

, c.

) impa

ct

ds.

urfa

ces

berm

s,

low

ing

anne

ls

avoi

d

es w

ill

d w

ith

Con

stru

perio

d

hrou

gh

eros

ion

pora

ry

ric,

redu

ce

eam

s

Con

stru

perio

d

Con

strue

me

nt,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

ce

–

emen

t

ion

of

rks ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

c

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

c

ctio

n C

onst

ruMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C In

spe

MoE

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C In

spe

MoE

ctin

g M

DFp

erv

isio

n

er)

Roa

d 14

8

ctor

ate

of

ctor

ate

of

imp

han

Ea r

fert

enr

req

agr

Soi

con

lub

the

equ

con

ope

equ

Ma

hav

sou

Imp

han

che

goo

pot

goo

env

con

IEE

Rep

ort

prop

er

stor

agnd

ling

rthw

orks

w

ill

imtil

e to

p so

ils

riche

d w

ith

quire

d fo

r pl

ant

ricul

tura

l dev

elop

m

il an

d su

rfac

ntam

inat

ion

rican

ts,

fuel

an

d

RoW

, br

idge

ui

pmen

t ya

rds

cns

truct

ion

activ

erat

ion

of

coui

pmen

t;

teria

ls u

sed

in c

ove

a

pote

ntia

l ur

ce

of

cont

prop

er

stor

agnd

ling

of f

uels

, em

ical

s an

d od

s/m

ater

ials

on

tent

ial

spill

s fro

ods

may

ha

viro

nmen

t or

ns

truct

ion

wor

kersge

an

d

mpa

ct

the

that

ar

e nu

trien

ts

grow

th o

r m

ent

sect

ce

wat

er

by

oil,

d pa

int

in

site

s an

d ca

used

by

iti

es

and

on

stru

ctio

n

onst

ruct

ion

to

be

a ta

min

atio

n.

ge

and

lubr

ican

ts,

haza

rdou

s n-

site

, an

d om

th

ese

arm

th

e he

alth

of

s.

Soi

lal

ig R

ive

Km

,

tions

of r

oad;

l -

the

nmen

t;

ers

– M

tkva

ri

0 -

1

- S

trip

stor

e 2m

a-

Spr

each

emTh

e co

ver

prop

o-

Tops

shou

lco

rrex

An

sto

thr

x E

rw

iw

hole

Th

e C

on-

Pre

path

e p

- Tr

ain

hand

proc

e-

Sto

rea

top

m a

wan

y h

area

s • • •-

All

rew

ill u

min

impr

ior

oper

apo

llutth

e to

p so

il to

ain

sto

ck p

iles

ofan

d w

ith a

slo

pe o

ad t

he t

opso

il to

m

ical

and

bio

logi

cst

ored

to

p so

irin

g al

l di

stur

bed

osed

pla

ntat

ion

sioi

l st

ockp

iles

wld

any

adv

erse

cct

ive

actio

ns w

ill na

erob

ic

cond

itoc

kpile

or

cr

earo

ugh

the

stoc

kpi

rosi

on -

tem

pora

ryll

be e

rect

ed;

ntra

ctor

sha

ll ar

e sp

ill co

ntro

l pla

n fo

r RD

app

rov

the

rel

evan

t co

nlin

g of

fu

els

edur

es.

e da

nger

ous

good

of a

sea

led

plas

way

fro

m w

ater

cha

zard

ous

was

te

s, w

hich

incl

ude

•

with

in 1

00m

M

tkva

ri or

ot h

• w

ithin

500

mar

eas,

cu

lt usi

tes

•

efue

ling

oper

atio

nus

e ab

sorb

ent

pm

ize

spills

, w

hich

to

the

com

me

atio

ns. G

roun

d w

tion

risk

will

be re

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

a de

pth

of 1

5 cm

f he

ight

not

exc

eof

1:2

m

aint

ain

the

p hca

l ac

tivity

of

the

l w

ill

be

utili

zed

area

and

alo

nite

s

w

ill be

m

onito

red

cond

ition

s be

ide

incl

ude:

io

ns

- tu

rnin

gtin

g ve

ntila

tion

ile;

y pr

otec

tive

silt

fe

proc

edur

es a

nd s

val.

ns

truct

ion

pers

onan

d sp

ill c

ds in

bun

ded

are

stic

she

et m

inim

uco

urse

s. D

o no

t in

the

in th

e re

s

from

the

ban

kshe

r stre

ams

f

rom

any

res

i dur

al

or

arch

aeo

ns o

n th

e w

orki

ngpa

ds

and/

or

str

h w

ill b

e pu

t in

en

cem

ent

of

ref

wat

er a

nd s

urfa

ceed

uced

or e

limin

a: E

ng

ine

erin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

m a

nd

eedi

ng

hysi

co-

e so

il.

ed

for

ng t

he

d an

d en

tifie

d

g th

e ho

les

enci

ng

perio

d:

star

ting

tops

oil

strip

pin g

endi

ng

rein

stat

e

subm

it

nnel

in

cont

rol

eas

on

m 1

00

stor

e st

ricte

d

s of

r

dent

ial

logi

cal

g si

tes

raw

to

pl

ace

fuel

ing

wat

er

ated

in

Con

stru

perio

d

em

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

from

g an

d w

ith

emen

t;

Con

trac

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

cMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

tor

Insp

eM

oE

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C In

spe

MoE

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 14

9

ctor

ate

of

ctor

ate

of

Con

gen

: - -

IEE

Rep

ort

nstru

ctio

n ne

ratio

n al

ongs

id

exce

ss

soil

ade

mol

ishe

d pa

ckag

ing

mat

e r

Con

cret

e an

dco

nstru

ctio

ns

was

te

e th

e R

oW

and

rock

, st

ruct

ures

, ria

ls e

tc.)

d m

etal

Con

nstru

ctio

n si

tes

case

gr

oun

be

haza

rau

tho

info

rmel

imin

alw

ayeq

uip

size

),ex

per

Agr

ee

wm

unic

ipa

rock

and

cove

r ma

This

is p

Ass

ess

adi

spos

al

Use

sp o

emba

nkm

Pro

vide

m

unic

ipa

Allo

w l

oro

ck, w

h Tr

ansp

osp

oil

dis

serv

ices

valu

abl e

ecol

ogic

Dem

olis

disp

ose d

The

pe

of

imm

edia

te

nd.

Soi

led

grou

nre

mov

ed,

stor

erd

ous

was

te.

In c

oriz

ed a

nd r

espo

med

, w

orks

w

illna

tion

of

pollu

tioys

be

ca

rrie

d pm

ent

(i.e.

noz

z,

and

only

by

rie

nced

Ref

uelin

gw

ith J

aglu

ja

land

aliti

es a

nd tr

ansp

d so

il) t

o th

e la

nat

eria

l for

clo

sing

prop

osed

act

in. I

nan

d, if

req

uire

d,

plan

oil a

nd e

xces

s ro

men

ts a

nd d

ike

w

for

disp

osal

fac

ial

ities

;

cal

com

mun

ities

ich

may

be

left

fo

rt an

y fu

rther

msp

osal

site

s ag

re.

The

mai

n pu

rpe

land

scap

es o

r s

al s

ensi

tiviti

es.

hed

met

al

con

d as

a s

crap

.

rson

nel

invo

lved

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

rem

oval

of

po

nd a

nd a

bsor

ben

ed

and

treat

eca

se o

f si

gnifi

can

onsi

ble

pers

on w

l be

st

oppe

d t

on

risk

Ref

uelin

out

with

th

e c

les

of t

he a

ppro

suita

bly

train

edg

Ope

rato

rs.

dfill

man

agem

enor

t the

spo

il (e

xce

ndfil

l an

d us

e it

the

land

fill.

mor

e ge

nera

l te

deve

lop

spoi

l an

ocks

for

con

stru

ctw

ith ri

prap

reve

tm

litie

s ag

reed

with

to

utili

ze a

ny e

ollo

win

g re

use.

mat

eria

l to

the

nee

d w

ith t

he m

upo

se i

s no

t to

da

soil

depo

sits

and

nstru

ctio

ns

shou

d in

th

e ha

ndli:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

ollu

ted

nts

will

d as

nt

spi

ll w

ill b

e ill

the

ng

will

corre

ct

opria

te

d an

d

nt a

nd

essi

ve

to a

s

rms:

d

rock

tion

of

men

t.

h lo

cal

exce

ss

eare

st

nici

pal

amag

e d

othe

r

ld

be

ing

of

Mob

iliza

stag

e C

onst

rupe

riod

Con

stru

perio

d M

obiliz

aem

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

atio

n

ctio

n

ctio

n

atio

n

Con

stru

Con

trac

Con

stru

Con

trac

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

ctin

g to

r

ctin

g to

r

MD

F C

MC

Insp

eM

oE

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 15

0

ctor

ate

of

Em

Veh

cau

Dus

con

sto

Du s

env

imp

IEE

Rep

ort

mis

sion

fro

m

Co

hicl

es

&

Eus

ing

air p

ollu

tion

st

gene

ratio

nns

truct

ion

site

s,ck

pile

s an

d ac

ce

st

is

a nu

isan

cvi

ronm

ent

caus

ipa

cts

for

wor

kerson

stru

ctio

n E

quip

men

ts

n

the

n fro

m

m

ater

ial

ss ro

ads.

ce

in

the

ng

heal

th

s an

d lo

cal

The

who

le a

lignm

ent

e w

hole

alig

nmen

t

haza

rdo

unde

rgo

- W

ast

- W

ast

- W

ast

Bur

ning

fo

rbid

debr

anch

esbe

tter

todi

ssem

in-

Em

iseq

uip

emis

s-

Any

cfro

m

- A

dhe

sche

d-

All

veso

t

nuis

a-

Reg

ube

un

min

imin

ject

high

sa

fe a

- V

ehic

avoi

dco

mp

and

cont

at

- A

ll pr

leve

l po

rtaco

nta

- D

urin

vehi

can

d

us

and

non-

ha s

peci

fic tr

aini

ng

te h

andl

ing

te

trea

tmen

t; an

d te

sto

rage

.

of w

aste

on

ann

with

the

exc

eps

from

felle

d tre

eo

be

burn

ed

inna

tion.

si

on le

vels

of a

ll c

pmen

t w

ill co

sion

sta

ndar

ds.

crus

hing

& c

oncr

popu

late

d ar

eas .

eren

ce

to

edu

les

and

stan

daeh

icle

s an

d pl

anth

at

thei

r em

iss

ance

to w

orke

rs o

ular

mai

nten

ance

nder

take

n to

ens

miz

ed,

for

exam

tors

. R

outin

e m

ast

anda

rd t

o en

san

d th

at e

mis

sion

cle

refu

elin

g w

ill b

d fu

gitiv

e em

issi

opo

unds

thr

ough

tpu

mps

and

enc

aine

rs w

ill b

e us

edre

caut

ions

to

beem

issi

ons

from

ble

crus

hers

with

ainm

ent m

easu

res

ng

dry

cond

itio

cles

an

d ha

ul

vfil

l m

ater

ial

w

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

azar

dous

w

aste

in

:

ny c

onst

ruct

ion

spt

ion

of s

tub

and

es a

nd b

ushe

s, w

or

der

to

avoi

d

cons

truct

ion

vehi

onfo

rm

to

Ge

ete

plan

ts w

ill be

. engi

ne

mai

nte

ards

& re

pair

ts s

hall

be m

ain

sion

s do

no

t or

loca

l peo

ple.

o

f di

esel

eng

ine

sure

that

em

issi

onm

ple

by

clea

ning

aint

enan

ce w

ill be

sure

tha

t ve

hicl

ens

are

min

imiz

edbe

und

erta

ken

soon

s of

vol

atile

oth

e us

e of

fue

l no

clos

ed t

anks

(no

d

to s

tore

d fu

el).

tak

en t

o re

duce

m

batc

hing

pl

ah

spra

ying

of w

ate

s.

ons

mat

eria

l de

vehi

cles

ca

rryi

ng

will

be

cove

red:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

w

ill

site

is

sm

all

hich

is

d pe

st

phas

e C

onst

rupe

riod

cles

&

orgi

an

e aw

ay

enan

ce

ntai

ned

caus

e

es w

ill

ns a

re

g fu

el

e to

a

es a

re

. o as

to

orga

nic

ozzl

es

ope

n

Con

stru

perio

d

e du

st

nts

& er

and

eliv

ery

sand

with

Con

stru

perio

d

em

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

and

ctio

n

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

c

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

cMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 15

1

pop

Noi

ope

in

by

me

set t

nois

Infr

infr

cou

1. p

2.

sup

3. O

Cre

bre

vec

sta

Cr e

bod

IEE

Rep

ort

pula

tion;

ise

pollu

tion

froer

atio

n du

ring

copo

pula

ted

area

sth

e hi

ghw

aytro

polit

an a

reas

tle

d ru

ral

are a

se.

rast

ruct

ure.

Th

rast

ruct

ure

elem

uld

be a

ffect

ed a

rpo

wer

line

s G

as

mai

nlin

e pp

ly p

ipel

ines

O

ptic

al fi

ber c

able

eatio

n of

ee

ding

hab

itats

foct

ors

of d

isea

se e

gnan

t po

ols

oea

tion

of

stag

ndi

es

in

borrom

ve

hicl

e on

stru

ctio

n t

rave

rsed

,

nota

bly

or d

ense

ly

as.

Loca

l

The

he

mai

n m

ent

that

re

: and

loca

l

e

tem

pora

ry

or m

osqu

ito

e.g.

sun

ny,

of

wat

er.

ant

wat

er

row

pi

ts,

who

e w

hole

alig

nmen

ole

alig

nmen

t

tarp

aro

ads

- P

rote

wor

kecr

ush

- U

se o

vehi

cap

pro

- S

hee

stor

ant

In

stal

l an

Rou

tine

to

ensu

emis

sion

used

on

to b

e i n

min

imiz

e P

rohi

bit

Pro

tecti

Impl

eme

relo

catio

agre

ed w

the

fram

Rep

lace

x

Re

wi

sit

x R

e

Per

man

rein

stat

eR

emov

eR

eins

ta

ulin

. The

con

stru

s w

ill be

wat

ered

ec

tive

equi

pmen

ers

as n

eces

sary

hers

. of

def

ined

hau

l ro

cle

spee

d w

hop

riate

traf

fic m

anet

ing

of

cons

truge

pile

s; a

nd

nd m

aint

ain

muf

flm

aint

enan

ce w

ilur

e th

at

vehi

cles

ns a

nd n

oise

are

site

will

be r

egu

n go

od w

orki

ng

e no

ise.

nigh

t w

orks

nea

ro

n o

f in

frastr

uc

ent

the

on/re

cons

truct

ion

with

the

ow

ners

es

of D

etai

led

De

the

affe

cted

infra

eloc

atio

n of

ov

ithin

the

right

of w

te:

eloc

atio

n of

gas

p

nent

mon

itorin

g d

emen

t in

case

of

e al

l cr

eate

d p

ate

relie

f and

land

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

ctio

n si

te a

nd a

nyas

app

ropr

iate

. t

to

be

prov

idy

e.g.

at q

uarri

es,

oute

s an

d re

duct

ihe

re

requ

ired

nage

men

t pla

nnin

uctio

n m

ater

ials

ers

on e

quip

men

l be

to a

hig

h st

as

are

safe

an

de

min

imiz

ed.

All

ular

ly m

aint

aine

d or

der

at a

ll ti m

r the

set

tlem

ents

tu

re.

e in

dpl

an

and

desi

gof

infra

stru

ctur

e es

ign.

astru

ctur

e el

emen

verh

ead

pow

er

way

of t

he c

onst

r

pipe

line

urin

g co

nstru

ctio

dam

age.

po

ols

till

sprin

gsc

ape.

: E

ng

ine

erin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

y lo

cal

ed

to

sto

ne

ions

in

with

ng

s

and

t. anda

rd

d th

at

l pl

ant

so a

s m

es t

o

Con

stru

perio

d

ivid

ual

gn

as

with

in

nts

lin

es

ruct

ion

n. F

ull

Pre

para

wor

ks

the

cons

truc

star

t up

g-tim

e.

Con

stru

perio

d

em

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

c

tory

be

fore

ctio

n

Con

stru

Con

trac

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

cMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 15

2

qua

mo

dis e

Hea

em and

con

Imp

site

Bio

dur

hol

ant

Haz

whe

with

Fin

Lo

nM

e T

rep

la

IEE

Rep

ort

arrie

s,

etc.

s

osqu

ito b

reed

ing

ease

vec

tors

. al

th h

azar

ds b

y is

sion

s an

d d u

d bl

own

by v

ehic

nstru

ctio

n ac

tiviti

e

pact

s on

ar

ches

and

rem

nant

s

olog

ical

re

con

ring

earth

wor

ks

es o

f so

il in

fec t

thra

x);

zard

ous

driv

ing

ere

cons

truct

ion

h pr

e- e

xist

ing

roa

nal

Rein

sta

tem

ng

-term

A

neasu

res

ee c

utt

ing

an

d O

an

tin

g p

rog

ram

. suite

d to

an

d ot

her

nois

e, a

ir us

t ra

ised

cl

es d

urin

g es

.

nea

haeo

logi

cal

Who

ntam

inat

ion

near

pes

t-tio

ns (

e.g.

Wh o

cond

ition

s in

terfe

res

ads.

Wh o

men

t an

d

nti

-ero

sio

n

Who

Off

set

tree

S

e n

ar s

ettle

men

ts

ole

alig

nmen

t

ole

alig

nmen

t

ole

alig

nmen

t

ole

alig

nmen

t

nsiti

ve z

ones

Dus

t con

min

imum

Noi

se

equi

pme

See

poi

Per

man

ean

d ex

ca S

topp

agac

tiviti

esC

ompl

etbe

fore

C

onse

rvP

erm

ane

and

exsu

spen

sbu

rial

sdi

visi

on

clea

ranc

Pro

vide

si

gns

ondr

iver

s A

ll th

e w

by th

e ro

rein

stat

eve

geta

tiocl

eara

ncup

grad

info

r re

ins

cove

r as

Offs

et t

rw

ith t

he

agre

eme

Orth

odox

cutte

d at

miti

gatio

ntro

l by

appl

icat

iom

as

2 br

owse

rs;

cont

rol,

inst

all a

ent,

dayt

ime

wor

knt

s 11

- 13

en

t m

onito

ring

dav

atio

n ac

tiviti

es.

e an

d su

spen

s in

ca

se

of

artio

n of

req

uire

d re

star

ting

c ova

tion

of re

mna

nts

ent

mon

itorin

g d

xcav

atio

n ac

tivi

sion

of

cons

truct

ioite

fin

ding

s.

No

of V

eter

inar

y D

ce b

efor

e st

art u

pin

des

ign

for p

rop

n ro

ads,

inc

ludi

n

wor

k si

tes

(exc

ept

oad

and

supp

orti

ed t

o its

initi

al c

oon

cov

er).

So

face

is

requ

ireng

, pr

eser

vatio

n st

atin

g th

e na

tus

wel

l re

e pl

antin

g pr

ogM

oE a

nd R

usta

ent

is

requ

ired

x C

hurc

h in

rel

at t

he b

orde

r of t

heon

pro

gram

will

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

on o

f w

ater

ing.

U

atio

n of

m

uffle

rks

;

durin

g la

nd

clea

nsio

n of

co

nstr

rcha

eolo

gica

l fin

arch

aeol

ogic

al

onst

ruct

ion

act

s.

durin

g la

nd

clea

ties.

St

oppa

ge

on a

ctiv

ities

in c

aot

ifica

tion

to

the

Dep

artm

ent.

Vet

e. pe

r mar

kers

and

ng

lig

hts.

Ins

tru

t per

man

ently

occ

ng fa

cilit

ies)

sho

ondi

tions

(re

lief,

tor

as v

ery

limite

ded

fo

r th

e hi

gof

top

-soi

l is

suf

ural

gr

ass

vege

ram

sho

uld

be a

vi M

unic

ipal

ity..S

w

ith

the

Ge

atio

n w

ith t

rees

e

Krts

anis

i Par

k.

incl

ude

mea

sur:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

Use

as

rs

on

Con

stru

perio

d

aran

ce

ruct

ion

ndin

gs.

wor

ks

tiviti

es.

Bef

ore

up

cons

truc

Con

stru

perio

d

aran

ce

and

ase

of

lo

cal

erin

ary

Con

stru

perio

d

safe

ty

ct t

he

Con

stru

perio

d

cupi

ed

uld

be

opso

il,

d bu

sh

ghw

ay

ffici

ent

etat

ion

agre

ed

Spe

cial

or

gian

to

be

Offs

et

res

on

Dev

elop

befo

re

cons

truc

star

t up.

Impl

eme

befo

re e

me

nt,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

c

star

t of

ctio

n;

ctio

n

Arc

haeo

from

Mo

Con

stru

Con

trac

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

c

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

c

Con

stru

Con

trac

p ctio

n . en

t

Con

stru

Con

tracM

ana

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

ctin

g to

r M

DF

olog

ist

oCM

ctin

g to

r

MD

FC

MC

Arc

h afro

m M

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 15

3

aeol

ogis

t M

oCM

Acc

veh

tha

tox

exp

of

So u

Ma

sec

(se

sec

Acc

rela

ma

int e

act

Qu

Tak

Ma

em app

loss

Pot

incr

on

and

IEE

Rep

ort

cide

nt r

isks

ass

ochi

cula

r tra

ffic

and

t m

ay

resu

lt in

ic m

ater

ials

, de

tpl

osiv

e lo

ad, i

njur

life(

see

WB

Env

urce

book

: 'H

teria

ls

Ma

ctio

n), i

njur

ies

or

e 'P

ublic

Hea

lth a

ctio

n)

cide

nts

due

to c

oat

ed

vehi

cles

a

chin

ery

or

erfe

renc

e w

ith c

oiv

ities

. arr

yin

g S

ite

s

king

of

Bor

row

ate

rials

fo

r co

nst

bank

men

ts fo

r ro

proa

ches

w

ith p

os

and

degr

adat

iote

ntia

l im

pact

re

ased

qua

rryin

gic

hthy

ofau

na,

grd

land

scap

e

ciat

ed w

ith

d tra

nspo

rt,

n sp

ills

of

tona

tion

of

ries

or lo

ss

viro

nmen

tal

Haz

ardo

us

anag

emen

t' lo

ss o

f life

an

d Sa

fety

onst

ruct

ion

and

heav

y tra

ffic

onst

ruct

ion

The

and

Qua

rry

truct

ion

of

oad,

brid

ge

oten

tial f

or

n of

land

; of

th

e g

activ

ities

ro

undw

ater

pre s

floo

e w

hole

alig

nmen

t

sum

ably

, r.M

dpla

in

repl

antin

impr

ovem

to a

pply

data

tre

ere

d da

ta A

pply

p

Spe

cies

pr

oced

uth

e Fo

ret

- P

rovi

safe

tyIn

stru

- D

esig

an e

mac

cid

- D

esig

mat

e-

Reg

uof

tra

- P

rohi

ecol

opo

pu

Mtk

vari

IEE

prop

in

thch

apt

In m

ore

Qua

rry a

from

lic

ens

Con

trgi

ven

and

rIn

cas

e al

l r e

the

ng o

f tre

es in

the

men

t of

the

par

ky

tree

plan

ting

rae

spec

ies

and

ra) t

ree

spec

ies.

proc

edur

es

for

From

N

atur

are

s fo

r ex

clus

ion

estry

Fun

d, w

here

de i

n de

sign

fo

y si

gns

on

rouc

t the

driv

ers

gn a

nd im

plem

enm

erge

ncy

plan

to

dent

al s

pills

. gn

ate

spec

ial

rria

ls tr

ansp

ort.

ulat

ion

of c

onst

ruc

ffic

inte

rfere

nce.

ib

ition

of

toxi

c w

ogic

ally

se

nsiti

vela

ted

area

s.

pose

s to

use

lice

e vi

cini

ty

to

t

ter 2

) ge

nera

l ter

ms:

an

d bo

rrow

pit

ma

exis

ting

oper

atse

s &

envi

roro

l of v

alid

ity o

f lic

n w

ith d

escr

iptio

rein

stat

emen

t com

of n

eed

for

open

equi

red

licen

ses

Min

istry

of

E

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

par

k zo

ne a

nd f

k ec

olog

y. W

e pr

atio

1:1

0 fo

r fe

lleat

io 1

:2 f

or o

ther

extra

ctin

g R

edal

E

nviro

nmen

t o

f th

e la

nd p

lots

e ap

prop

riate

r

prop

er m

arke

rad

s,

incl

udin

g

nt s

afet

y m

easu

reco

ntai

n da

mag

e

rout

es

for

haza

ctio

n tra

nspo

rt in

was

te t

rans

port

the

area

s an

d de

ense

d qu

errie

s lo

the

proj

ect

road

ater

ials

will

be o

bin

g si

tes

with

p

onm

enta

l cl

eara

cens

es. (

The

lice

n of

exp

lora

tion

mm

itmen

ts).

ning

new

bor

row

w

ill be

obt

aine

dE

nerg

y an

d N:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

furth

er

ropo

se

ed r

ed

r (n

on-

d Li

st

and

s fro

m

com

plet

rs a

nd

light

s.

es a

nd

s fro

m

ardo

us

term

s

hrou

gh

ense

ly

ocat

ed

d (s

ee

btai

ned

prop

er

ance

s.

ense

is

limits

area

s,

d fro

m

Nat

ural

Con

stru

perio

d

em

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

ion

Con

stru

Con

trac

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

cMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C In

spe

MoE

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 15

4

ctor

ate

of

Co

Co

eq

uF

le The

to

ope

be

- - - - -

IEE

Rep

ort

ncre

te p

lan

ts.

nstr

ucti

on

u

ipm

en

t yard

an

eet

Sit

e

e po

tent

ial

impa

cth

e co

nstru

cer

atio

n of

the

ca

sum

mar

ized

as

fC

lear

ance

of

co

ver

durin

gco

nstru

ctio

n P

oten

tial

dam

tops

oil

Con

tam

inat

ion

fuel

sto

rage

an d

oper

atio

ns

Sew

erag

e co

ntam

inat

ion

Was

te

cont

amin

atio

n

Pla

n

Cam

p,

nd

Ve

hic

le

cts

rela

ted

ctio

n an

d am

p co

uld

follo

ws:

ve

geta

tion

g ca

mp

mag

e of

rela

ted

to

d f

uelli

ng

rela

ted

rela

ted

cam

nt s

ite

mp

site

Res

o M

easu

r ecl

ose

acco

r C

ontro

l A

void

leak

ave

hic

Con

tract

requ

i In

cas

e de

cis

spec

iE

nvir

- P

rope

XX

WC

amp

- A

pply

and

r-

Arra

nvi

llag

cons

tor

gan

- P

ollu

tor

gan

- P

rope

- R

eins

cove

r

ourc

es;

es w

ill b

e ta

ken

te

of

use

the

ard

ing

to li

cens

ing

of v

ehic

le o

pera

d tra

vers

e of

ag

e of

oil

or fu

el.

cles

. t

only

lic

ense

dre

d en

viro

nmen

ta

if th

e C

onst

ruc

sion

to in

stal

l and

ific

EIA

sh

ould

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

er w

aste

man

agW

aste

M

anag

emps

) y

regu

latio

ns r

ele

refe

rred

in p

. 8.1

.ng

e ac

com

mod

aes

. In

ca

se

if tru

cted

for t

he w

oni

ze s

ewer

age

actio

n pr

even

tion

niza

tion

of fu

elin

ger

sto

rage

of t

ops

stat

emen

t of

to

r;

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

to c

onse

rve

top

sar

ea

to

be

recl

cond

ition

s.

atio

ns a

t qu

arry

w

ater

cour

se.

Ex

Che

ck th

e co

ndi

su

pplie

r ha

vin

al p

erm

its.

ctin

g C

ontra

ctor

d

oper

ate

its o

wn

d be

pr

epar

edt P

erm

it ob

tain

ed

gem

ent

(see

app

men

t P

roce

dure

evan

t to

the

cam

p1.

13

atio

n of

pe

rson

nla

rge

cam

p w

orke

rs a

ccom

mod

ccor

ding

sta

ndar

dn

mea

sure

s:

pg,

was

te m

anag

emso

il op

soil

and

vege:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

soil.

At

laim

ed

site

s.

xclu

de

tion

of

ng

all

take

s p

lant

, d

and

Con

stru

perio

d

pend

ix

es

for

p si

tes

nel

in

will

be

da

tion,

ds

. pr

oper

m

ent;

etat

ion

Con

stru

perio

d

em

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

c

ctio

n C

onst

ruC

ontra

cMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C

ctin

g to

r M

DF

CM

C In

spe

MoE

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 15

5

ctor

ate

of

IEE

Rep

ort

Op

era

tio

n P Im

p

Eros

ion

from

fil

ls

and

sed

natu

ral d

rain

aEr

osio

n of

laro

ad

bed

conc

entra

ted

cove

red

or o

pC

hara

cte

r o

fte

rm.

Cha

nge

of r

patte

rns,

la

nm

ay

caus

e st

abile

in

teer

osio

n La

ndsc

ape

dem

bank

men

tcu

ts,

fills

a

Mar

red

land

from

ro

d ch

as

e

pacts

road

cut

s an

d di

men

tatio

n of

ag

e w

ays.

an

ds b

elow

the

d

rece

ivin

g o

utflo

w f

rom

pe

n dr

ains

. f

imp

ac

t: lo

ng-

elie

f, dr

aina

ge

nd

clea

ranc

e,

grad

ual

but

nsifi

catio

n of

disf

igur

atio

n by

ts

an

d de

ep

and

quar

ries.

ds

cape

(s

cars

cu

ts,

indu

ced

Sit

es

Who

le a

lignm

New

cut

site

s

Mit

iga

men

t M

itiga

tion

term

– re

mre

inst

ate

land

sca p

Inst

alla

tiodr

aina

geer

osio

n s

- re

inst

aso

il an

- in

stal

ladr

aina

gpe

rma

- In

stal

lase

dim

ese

edin

erod

ibl

soon

a-

Incr

eadr

ain

o-

Pla

ce

to a

voi

- Li

ne

with

st o

- Lo

ng-te

and

ma

. -

Mai

nte

rest

ora

vege

ta-

Use

de

sign

ati

on

Measu

res

n st

rate

gy:

lom

edia

tion;

m

ent

of r

elie

f a

pe;

on

of

long

-tee

syst

ems

and

ast

ruct

ures

. at

emen

t of

re

d ve

geta

tion

coat

ion

of

long

-tege

sy

stem

a

nent

mon

itorin

gat

ion

enta

tion

bas

g or

pl

antin

g le

su

rface

s as

pos

sibl

e as

e nu

mbe

r ou

tlets

. dr

ain

outle

ts s

od

casc

ade

effe

cre

ceiv

ing

surf

ones

, con

cret

e.er

m

mon

itoai

nten

ance

en

ance

and

and

atio

n of

ro

ads

atio

n

an

arch

itect

to

'ble

nd w

ith

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

s

Tim

efr

a

ong-

and

erm

an

ti-

elie

f, ov

er

erm

an

d g.

; of

sins

, of

as

of

o as

ct

. fa

ce

ring

Con

stru

ctst

age;

M

aint

ena

afte

r co

mpl

eti o

cons

truct

i

d/or

si

de

ural

th

e

Con

stru

c tst

age;

M

aint

ena:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

am

eR

es

Im

tion

nce

on

of

ion

Con

stru

RD

MR

pers

pe

tion

nce

Con

str u

RD

MR

pers

pe

em

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

sp

on

sib

ilit

y f

or

ple

men

tati

on

uctin

g co

ntra

cto

DI

in

long

-tect

ive

uctin

g co

ntra

cto

DI

in

long

-tect

ive

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

rR

es

po

nfo

r M

on

an

En

forc

or erm

RD

MR

DI

Insp

ecto

raM

oE

or erm

RD

MR

DI

Insp

ecto

raM

oE

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 15

6

ns

ibil

ity

nit

ori

ng

n

d

ce

me

nt

ate

of

ate

of

IEE

Rep

ort

land

slid

es

etc.

).

Incr

ease

d se

dim

ent

affe

cted

b y

cons

truct

ion

sro

ad c

uts,

fi

dum

ps.

dequ

ality

du

e se

dim

enta

tioC

hara

cte

r o

fte

rm.

Cha

nge

of r

patte

rns,

la

nm

ay

caus

e st

abile

in

teer

osio

n So

il an

cont

amin

atio

grea

se,

fue

alon

gsid

e th

e

Air

pollu

tion

asph

alt

plm

aint

enan

ceAi

r po

llutio

n op

erat

ion,

ar

eas

trave

high

way

, m

etro

polit

an

dens

ely

settl

eLo

cal d

ust.

and

slum

ps

susp

ende

d in

st

ream

s y

eros

ion

at

site

s an

d fre

sh

ills

and

was

te

eclin

ed

wat

er

to

incr

ease

d n.

f

imp

ac

t: lo

ng-

elie

f, dr

aina

ge

nd

clea

ranc

e,

grad

ual

but

nsifi

catio

n of

nd

wat

er

n by

oi

l, el

an

d pa

int

e hi

ghw

ay

fro

m

mob

ile

ants

du

ring

wor

ks.

from

ve

hicl

e in

po

pula

ted

erse

d by

th

e no

tabl

y ar

eas

or

ed r

ural

are

as.

near

th

e r

Mtk

vari

who

le a

lignm

e

who

le a

lignm

e

who

le a

lignm

e M

ost

crit

star

ting

pone

ar

Gu

brid

ge

and

epo

int

clos

e

land

sc-

Rep

lan

surfa

ceiv

er

Mit

igati

on

term

– re

mR

eins

tate

land

scap

em

onito

ring

long

-term

and

anti-

eR

eins

tate

cove

r.

Est

ablis

hmco

ver

on

as s

oon

a

ent

Inst

all

oibr

idge

s C

here

kha

Faci

litat

e st

anda

rd

and

repa

high

way

en

t In

stal

l a

pollu

tion

c

ent

tical

oi

nt

ulua

en

d to

- M

onito

and

emis

sio

insp

ecem

issi

o-

Dev

elo

and

reape.

nt

disf

igu

es.

n

str

ate

gy:

lom

edia

tion;

em

ent

of r

elie

f a

e;

Long

-teg;

In

stal

latio

n d

rain

age

syst

eer

osio

n st

ruct

uem

ent o

f veg

eta

men

t of

veg

eta

erod

ible

sur

faas

pos

sibl

e

il tra

ps

at

la(G

ubis

tsk

a, O

chop

a);

inst

alla

tion

refu

elin

g st

ati

ir sh

ops

alon

g

and

oper

ate

cont

rol e

quip

me

orin

g of

air

qua

traffi

c re

laon

s (in

clud

tion

of

veh

ons)

op

men

t of

po

egul

atio

ns

limi

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

ured

af

ter

com

plet

ioco

nstru

cti

ong-

and

erm

of

em

s re

s.

tion

ativ

e ac

es

arge

ka

li,

of

ons

the

afte

r co

mpl

etio

cons

truct

i

air

ent.

Dur

ing

Mai

nten

aW

orks

al

ity

ated

di

ng

hicl

e

olic

y tin

g

: E

ng

ine

erin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

on

of

ion

Con

stru

RD

MR

pers

pe

on

of

ion

RD

MR

pers

pe

nce

RD

MR

wor

ks

Con

trac

MoE

Con

stru

RD

MR

pers

pe

em

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

uctin

g co

ntra

cto

DI

in

long

-tect

ive

DI

in

long

-tect

ive

DI

supe

rvis

and

Mai

nten

anct

or

uctin

g co

ntra

cto

DI

in

long

-tect

ive

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

or erm

RD

MR

DI

Insp

ecto

raM

oE

erm

R

DM

RD

I

ing

nce

RD

MR

DI

or

erm

MoE

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 15

7

ate

of

IEE

Rep

ort

Noi

se

pol

vehi

cle

oppo

pula

ted

arby

th

e hi

ghm

etro

polit

an

dens

ely

settl

e

Roa

dsid

e lit

te C

reat

ion

of a

for

dise

aaf

fect

ing

hllutio

n fro

m

pera

tion,

in

re

as t

rave

rsed

hw

ay,

nota

bly

area

s or

ed

rura

l are

as.

er.

a ne

w p

athw

ay

se

vect

ors

hum

ans

and

Pho

nich

ala;

who

le a

lignm

e M

ost

crit

star

ting

pone

ar

Gu

brid

ge

and

epo

int

clos

e P

honi

chal

a;

who

le a

lignm

e

who

le a

lignm

e

traffi

c (r

egul

aqu

ality

-

Req

uir

engi

nesc

hedu

(or

use

to re

du-

Pla

nt

road

sid

smoo

thim

pact

loca

ted

ent

tical

oi

nt

ulua

en

d to

- H

igh

woo

d e-

Req

uir

engi

nesc

hedu

- P

lant

ro

adsi

dsm

ooth

on

thvi

llage

s-

Enh

antra

nsp o

man

agen

t -

Pro

vide

faci

litie

- E

ncou

law

s a

ent

Est

ablis

hman

imal

s

and

relare

late

d em

issi

atio

ns

on

etc

.)

re

adhe

renc

e e

mai

nten

aul

es a

nd s

tand

ae

alte

rnat

ive

fuuc

e ai

r pol

lutio

ntre

es

alon

g de

to

scre

en a

hen

emis

sts

on

th

e cl

d vi

llage

s so

lid

wal

ls

en o

r sto

ne/b

rick

re

adhe

renc

e e

mai

nten

aul

es a

nd s

tand

atre

es

alon

g de

to

scre

en a

hen

nois

e im

pahe

cl

ose

loca

s

ce

puor

tatio

n an

d tra

gem

ent c

apab

ilite

for

disp

oes

. ra

ge

anti-

litte

nd re

gula

tions

.

men

t of

pl

ant

sani

tatio

n se

rvat

ed

chec

kpo

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

ons

fuel

to

nce

ards

el

s)

. the

and

sion

os

e – k

to

nce

ards

th

e an

d ac

ts

ated

ublic

af

fic

ty.

osal

ring

ad

vice

oi

nts

Ope

ratio

npe

riod

: E

ng

ine

erin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

Mai

nte

RD

MR

pers

pe

Loca

l au

thor

ipr

ovid

eR

egio

nM

oE

tw

ith s

t an

Cus

tom

“San

itaIn

spec

tem

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

nanc

e co

ntra

cto

DI

in

long

-tect

ive

Gov

ernm

etie

s an

d R

DM

Re

faci

litie

s a

nal

serv

ices

ra

cks

com

plia

nan

dard

sm

s S

ervi

car

y Su

perv

istio

n of

tM

ana

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

or erm

MoE

ent

RD

I an

d of

nce

RD

MR

DI

Insp

ecto

raM

oE

es,

ion

the

RD

MR

DI

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 15

8

ate

of

IEE

Rep

ort

anim

als.

C

rtra

nsm

issi

on

dise

ases

, p

and

othe

r or

gani

sms

Hea

lth

haza

rais

ed

and

vehi

cles

.

Obs

truct

ion

road

s

reat

ion

of

a co

rrid

or

for

pest

s,

wee

ds

unde

sira

ble

ards

by

du

st

bl

own

by

of

acce

ss

who

le a

lignm

e

Cro

ssig

of

loro

ads

(not

loc

apr

ojec

t b

cont

rol t

he

ent

Impa

ct

asph

alt

Dus

t co

nof

wat

er.

ocal

P

rope

r in

terc

hang

this

pot

enR

AP

lly o

n th

e cu

rrbu

t in

ge

nera

l,e

who

le h

ighw

a

is

min

imal

pa

ved

high

wtro

l by

app

lica

Des

ign

ges

have

miti

gant

ial i

mpa

ct. S

ee

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

rent

to

ay on

w

ay.

tion

Ope

ratio

npe

riod

of

ated

e

in

Des

ign

st: E

ng

ine

erin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

MLH

SP

and

Se

rvic

eFo

odst

Vete

ri nPr

otec

tM

inis

tryAg

ricul

n R

DM

R

tage

Con

stru

Con

tracem

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

P”, th

e “N

atio

e fo

r t

uffs

Sa

fena

ry

and

Pla

tion”

of

t

y of

t

ture

DI

uctin

gct

or

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

nal

the

ety,

an

t th

e th

e

RD

MR

DI

RD

MR

DIp

erv

isio

n

er)

Roa

d 15

9

P M M t a s r d T s F r C w

IEE

Rep

ort

8.5

E

nvir

on

Co

nstr

ucti

on

P

hase

Mat

eria

l sup

ply

Mat

eria

l tra

nspo

rt ac

cord

ing

to th

e sc

hedu

le a

nd

rout

es

defin

ed fo

r de

liver

ies

Top-

soil

strip

ping

sta

ge.

Fina

l re

inst

atem

ent.

Con

stru

ctio

n w

ork

men

tal

Mo

nit

o

n P

ha

se

Wh

at?

(p

ara

mete

r is

to

Pos

sess

ion

of o

or v

alid

ope

rati

Truc

k lo

ads

cov

Air

pollu

tion

dufu

mes

rela

ted

tTr

ansp

ort

Top-

soil

stor

agR

eins

tate

men

t .E

rosi

on c

ontro

lLa

ndsc

ape

des

Vis

ual i

mpa

cts;

Noi

se le

vels

; E

quip

men

t;

rin

g P

lan

(M

atr

o b

e m

on

itore

d)

offic

ial a

ppro

val

ng li

cens

e

vere

d/ w

ette

d

ue to

the

dust

and

to th

e M

ater

ial

ge.

. l. stru

ctio

n;

;

rix

) Wh

ere

?

(is t

he p

ara

me

be m

onito

red)

Sup

plie

r of

mat

eria

ls (a

s pce

men

t and

gr

d C

onst

ruct

ion

san

d ac

cess

ro

Con

stru

ctio

n s

Con

stru

ctio

n se

ter

to

Ho

w?

(is

pa

ram

etbe

m

o/ty

pe

mon

itori

equi

pme

phal

t, ra

vel)

Insp

ecti

site

oa

d

Sup

ervi

s

site

S

uper

vis

site

In

spec

tico

mpl

iam

onito

r i(e

ngin

e m

aint

enus

age

om

uffle

rstim

e w

o

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

the

ter

to

onito

red of

ing

ent/?

)

Wh

en

?(is

th

eto

be

freq

uen

me

asu

contin

u

on

Bef

ore

agre

emsu

pply

is

for m

sion

U

nann

insp

ecw

ork

h

sion

P

erio

d(U

nan n

insp

ecw

ork

hto

p-so

ito

com

the

wo

on;

nce

ing

nanc

e,

of

s, n

ight

rk

Per

iod

once

p

: E

ng

ine

erin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

?

e

pa

ram

ete

r m

onito

red

–

ncy

of

ure

me

nt

or

uo

usl

y)

W (i to (r o

e an

m

ent f

or th

e y

of m

ater

ials

m

aliz

ed

A co H re

ounc

ed

tions

dur

ing

ours

A co H re E a t ric

no

unce

d tio

ns d

urin

g ou

rs);

From

il

strip

ping

–

mpl

etio

n of

or

ks.

A co co st e n pic

(ave

rage

pe

r mon

th);

A co H re G st coe

me

nt,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

Wh

y?

is

the

para

mete

ro

be

monito

red

reply

is

not

oblig

ato

ry))

Ass

ure

ompl

ianc

e w

ith

HS

E

equi

rem

ents

Ass

ure

ompl

ianc

e w

ith

HS

E

equi

rem

ents

. E

nsur

e sa

fety

, nd

min

imiz

e ra

ffic

disr

uptio

n.A

ssur

e om

plia

nce

with

, on

stru

ctio

n ta

ndar

ds,

nviro

nmen

tal

orm

s an

d E

MP

ro

visi

ons;

Ass

ure

ompl

ianc

e w

ith

HS

E

equi

rem

ents

.

Goo

d co

nditi

on o

f ta

ndar

d on

stru

ctio

n

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

r d t

Co

st

R e

N/a

M S A ( )

Min

imal

In

clud

ed in

su

perv

isio

n cont

ract

s

M C

Min

imal

In

clud

ed in

su

perv

isio

n cont

ract

s

M C

Min

imal

In

clud

ed in

su

perv

isio

n cont

ract

s

M C Mpe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 16

0

Re

sp

on

sib

le I

nsti

tuti

on

MD

F S

uper

visi

ng

Age

ncy

(CM

C

) MD

F C

MC

MD

F C

MC

MD

F C

MC

MoE

P C w C w W c p W c p

IEE

Rep

ort

Ph

ase

Con

stru

ctio

n w

ork

Con

stru

ctio

n w

ork

Who

le

cons

truct

ion

perio

d.

Who

le

cons

truct

ion

perio

d.

Wh

at?

(p

ara

mete

r is

to

Vib

ratio

n

Dus

t and

Air

popa

rticl

es, s

uspe

flyin

g he

avy

me

Traf

fic s

afet

y/ V

pede

stria

n ac

ceap

prop

riate

sig

Mat

eria

l and

wa

hand

ling,

use

Wqu

ality

(sus

pen

etc)

o b

e m

on

itore

d)

ollu

tion

(sol

id

ende

d so

lids,

et

al p

artic

les)

Veh

icle

/ es

s V

isib

ility

/ gn

s

aste

sto

rage

, W

ater

and

soi

l nd

ed s

olid

s, o

ils,

Wh

ere

?

(is the p

ara

me

be m

onito

red)

Con

stru

ctio

n s

At o

r nea

r co

nstru

ctio

n s

Con

stru

ctio

n s

Mat

eria

l and

wst

orag

e si

tes;

R

un o

ff fro

m s

mat

eria

l sto

rag

limita

tion

othe

r pr

ovis

ioE

MP.

) no

ise

mea

sur i

devi

ce

ete

r to

H

ow

?

(is th

e pa

ram

etm

onito

reof

mon

iteq

uipm

esi

te

Sup

ervi

s

ite

Vis

ually

site

O

bser

va

was

te

site

; ge

Obs

erv a

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

ns a

nd

ns o

f

ing

Onl

y i n

com

pla

ter t

o be

ed

/typ

e to

ring

ent/?

)

Wh

en

(is the

to b

e

frequ

em

eas

conti n

sion

U

nan

insp

ecfo

llow

com

p

Dur

ing

deliv

epe

riod

perio

dco

nst

atio

n O

nce

the

ev

atio

n D

urin

gde

live

perio

dco

nst:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

n ca

se o

f ai

nts

m lim n t o w w n

n?

e p

ara

mete

r m

onito

red –

ency

of

ure

me

nt

or

nuousl

y)

W (i to (r o

noun

ced

ctio

ns;

win

g la

ints

A co H re

g m

ater

ial

ery

and

dica

lly in

dry

ds

dur

ing

ruct

ion

A co H A co e n ppe

r wee

k in

ve

ning

A co

g m

ater

ial

ery

and

dica

lly d

urin

g ru

ctio

n

A a A coem

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

mac

hine

ry a

nd

miti

ng th

e w

orks

ea

r set

tlem

ents

o

the

site

-rela

ted

wor

ks is

the

only

w

ay fo

r effi

cien

t oi

se c

ontro

l

Wh

y?

is the p

ara

mete

r o b

e m

onito

red

reply

is n

ot

oblig

ato

ry))

Ass

ure

ompl

ianc

e w

ith

HS

E

equi

rem

ents

.

Ass

ure

ompl

ianc

e w

ith

HS

E re

quire

men

t,A

ssur

e om

plia

nce

with

, nv

ironm

enta

l or

ms

and

EM

P

rovi

sion

s.

Ass

ure

ompl

ianc

e

Ass

ure

pollu

tion

bate

men

t; A

ssur

e om

plia

nce

with

, Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

Co

st

R In

Min

imal

In

clud

ed

in

supe

rvis

ion co

ntra

cts

C C C

Min

imal

In

clud

ed

in

supe

rvis

ion co

ntra

cts

C C R C

Min

imal

In

clud

ed

in

supe

rvis

ion co

ntra

cts

C C M C

Min

imal

In

clud

ed

in

supe

rvis

io

C C M Cpe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 16

1

Re

sp

on

sib

len

sti

tuti

on

Con

stru

ctin

g C

ontra

ctor

CM

C

Con

stru

ctin

g C

ontra

ctor

RD

MR

DI

CM

C

Con

stru

ctin

g C

ontra

ctor

; M

DF

CM

C

Con

stru

ctin

g C

ontra

ctor

; M

DF;

C

MC

W c p W c p W c p P

IEE

Rep

ort

Who

le

cons

truct

ion

perio

d.

Who

le

cons

truct

ion

perio

d.

Who

le

cons

truct

ion

perio

d.

Ph

ase

Was

te M

anag

e

Equ

ipm

ent m

aifu

ellin

g

Wat

er a

nd s

oil

(sus

pend

ed s

oet

c)

Impa

cts

on a

rcan

d re

mna

nts

Wh

at?

( p

ara

mete

r is

to

emen

t

inte

nanc

e an

d

qual

ity

lids,

oils

, fue

l,

chae

olog

ical

site

s

o b

e m

onito

red

)

area

s; w

ash

dar

eas

All

cons

truct

iosi

tes;

C

amps

; R

efue

ling

and

equi

pmen

t m

aint

enan

ce

faci

litie

s;

Run

off

from

sm

ater

ial s

tora

gar

eas

A

ll ea

rthw

ork

s

Wh

ere

?

(is t

he p

ara

me

be m

onito

red)

own

on

Obs

erva

site

; ge

Obs

erva

site

s O

bser

va

ete

r to

H

ow

?

(is

para

met

em

onito

reof

m

oeq

uipm

e

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

(ave

raes

pec

prec

ipsn

ow/

atio

n O

nce

atio

n D

urin

gde

live

perio

dco

nst

(ave

raes

pec

prec

ipsn

ow/

atio

n P

erm

a

the

er t

o be

d

/type

on

itorin

g nt

/?)

Wh

en

?(is

th

eto

be m

freq

uen

me

asu

contin

u: E

ng

ine

erin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

age

1/w

eek)

, ci

ally

dur

ing

pita

tion

(rain

/ / e

tc).

c o st e n ppe

r wee

k A a A co co st e n p

g m

ater

ial

ery

and

dica

lly d

urin

g ru

ctio

n ag

e 1/

wee

k),

cial

ly d

urin

g pi

tatio

n (ra

in/

/ etc

).

A a

anen

t/dai

ly

A h p

?

e

para

mete

r m

onito

red –

ncy

of

ure

me

nt

or

uo

usl

y)

Wh

(is

be

is n

em

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

onst

ruct

ion

tand

ards

, nv

ironm

enta

l or

ms

and

EM

P

rovi

sion

s;A

ssur

e po

llutio

n ba

tem

ent;

Ass

ure

ompl

ianc

e w

ith,

onst

ruct

ion

tand

ards

, nv

ironm

enta

l or

ms

and

EM

P

rovi

sion

sA

ssur

e po

llutio

n ba

tem

ent

Ass

ure

cultu

ral

erita

ge

rote

ctio

n

hy?

the p

ara

mete

r to

e m

onito

red

(re

ply

not

oblig

ato

ry))

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

n cont

ract

s

Min

imal

In

clud

ed

in

supe

rvis

ion co

ntra

cts

C C M C

Min

imal

In

clud

ed

in

supe

rvis

ion co

ntra

cts

C C M C

Min

imal

C re C C C

o y

Co

st

Re

Inspe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 16

2

Con

stru

ctin

g C

ontra

ctor

; M

DF

CM

C

Con

stru

ctin

g C

ontra

ctor

; M

DF

CM

C

CA

S

epre

sent

. C

onst

ruct

ing

Con

tract

or;

CM

C

esp

on

sib

le

sti

tuti

on

W c p W c p D C p D C p D C p

IEE

Rep

ort

Who

le

cons

truct

ion

perio

d.

Who

le

cons

truct

ion

perio

d.

Dur

ing

Con

stru

ctio

n pe

riod

Dur

ing

Con

stru

ctio

n pe

riod

Dur

ing

Con

stru

ctio

n pe

riod

biol

ogic

al re

con

durin

g ea

rthw

oho

les

of s

oil i

n fan

thra

x);

Prot

ectio

n of

inel

emen

ts

offs

et tr

ee p

lan

Rei

nsta

tem

ent

Dis

posa

l of c

onw

aste

s

ntam

inat

ion

rks

near

pes

t-fe

ctio

ns (e

.g.

frast

ruct

ure

ting

Pro

gram

of w

ork

site

s

nstru

ctio

n

All

earth

wor

k s

Cro

ssin

gs o

f po

lines

, pip

elin

es S

ites

adja

cent

th

e S

Z 1

and

3

wor

k si

tes,

roa

alig

nmen

t, us

equ

arrie

s, c

amp

site

s

wor

k si

tes,

roa

alig

nmen

t, us

equ

arrie

s, c

amp

site

s

site

s O

bser

vat

ower

s;

O

bser

vat

to

3 O

bser

vat

d ed

p

Obs

erva

t

d ed

p

Obs

erva

t

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

tion

Per

ma

tion

Dur

ing

cons

truac

tiviti

esi

tes

o

tion

Dur

ing

Con

str

perio

d

tion

Dur

ing

Con

str

perio

d,co

mpl

ew

orks

si

te

tion

Dur

ing

Con

str

perio

d,co

mpl

ew

orks

si

te

: E

ng

ine

erin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

anen

t/dai

ly

As pro

uctio

n es

at t

he

f con

cern

A s inf

pro

ruct

ion

A s da lan

ruct

ion

, afte

r et

ion

of

at c

oncr

ete

Re

wo

by

ruct

ion

, afte

r et

ion

of

at c

oncr

ete

En

pre

lan

proem

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

ssur

e he

alth

ot

ectio

n

ssur

e fra

stru

ctur

e ot

ectio

n

ssur

e of

fset

of

mag

e to

flor

a an

dnd

scap

e

eins

tate

men

t of

ork

site

s no

t tak

enR

oW

nsur

e po

llutio

n ev

entio

n an

d nd

scap

e ot

ectio

n;

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

Min

imal

In

clud

ed

in

supe

rvis

ion

cont

ract

s

Co

Fie

MD

CM

Ve

De

the

Min

imal

In

clud

ed

in

supe

rvis

ion

cont

ract

s

Co

Co

MD

CM

d M

inim

al

Incl

uded

in

su

perv

isio

n co

ntra

cts

Co

Co

MD

CM

Mo

n

Co

Co

MD

CM

Co

Co

MD

CM

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 16

3

onst

ruct

ion

eld

offic

er;

DF

MC

eter

inar

y ep

artm

ent o

fe

NS

FSV

PPon

stru

ctin

g on

tract

or

DF

MC

onst

ruct

ing

ontra

ctor

;

DF

MC

oE

onst

ruct

ing

ontra

ctor

;

DF

MC

onst

ruct

ing

ontra

ctor

;

DF

MC

W c p

IEE

Rep

ort

Who

le

cons

truct

ion

perio

d.

Per

sona

l Pro

teeq

uipm

ent.

HS

Org

aniz

atio

n o f

ctiv

e E

issu

es

f tra

ffic

by-p

ass

Con

stru

ctio

n si

te

Insp

ectio

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

on

Una

nnin

spec

wor

ks :

En

gin

ee

rin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

ounc

ed

tions

dur

ing

As wit

reqem

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

ssur

e co

mpl

ianc

e th

HS

E

quire

men

ts

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

Min

imal

In

clud

ed

in

supe

rvis

ion

cont

ract

s

Co

Co

MD

CM

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 16

4

onst

ruct

ing

ontra

ctor

;

DF

MC

9. P 9.1 R A. Leg 230. In Arights regovernmetransbouauthoritie 231. Theconsultatnamely:

1. Thsuisco

2. Thcote

3. Th

4. Th

5. R6. P

is 232. Accmeeting, commentAppropriathe commshould beletters, ebody resmentione

UBLIC CON

REQUIREME

islation and

April 2000 Geegarding acental decisindary envir

es.

e law of Geotion in the E

he project eubmission o

ssuance (whonducted behe project onducting oferritorial offiche announc

a) goal, tb) locatio

themson env

c) the ded) the pla

he executor a) provid

that isb) accep

45 dayc) condu

publicd) invite

represof Ecopublic

Reviews will bublic review

s planned.

cording to tthe minute

ts raised aate correctioments and e sent to thexplanations sponsible foed document

Loan2565Modernizati

NSULTATIO

ENTS FOR P

d regulation

eorgia ratifieccess to infon-making

ronment. It

orgia on EnvEIA/IEE proc

executor will of the projechere activitieefore beginn

executor wf public revi

ce (if any) of ement must title and placon of the ageselves with tvironmental

eadline for suace and timewill:

de EIA hardssues permispt and considys after the d

uct public revation of the correspond

sentatives; tonomical De review; be conducte

w will be cond

the article 7es of the meand explanaons should bproposals oe concernedand correct

or issuing tts should be


ONPROCESS

PUBLIC DIS

ns of Georg

ed Aarhus coformation, pprocesses focuses on

vironmental cess and de

conduct puct to the goes require cing the seco

will publish ew. The infthe region, contain the

ce of the plaency where the documenimpact);

ubmittal of ce for public r

copy and ssion one weder written ndate of evaluview of the pannounceming local sehe Ministry

evelopment a

ed in a publicducted at th

7 of the laweeting shouations provibe incorporaof stakeholdd persons. Ttions shouldthe Permit

e considered


S

SCLOSURE

ia

onvention. Tpublic particon matters n interactio

Impact Permefines timeli

blic review oovernmentalconstruction ond step of th

the informaformation wiwhere the afollowing infnned activitythe interest

nts associat

considerationreview.

electronic veek after pubnotes and cuation publicplanned actient;

elf – adminiof the Envirand other inv

c way and ane region adm

w,5 days aftld be prepaided by theated into theders are noThe minutes d be submitt

as supplem as an esse


AND CONS

This UNECEcipation anconcerning

ns between

mits (2008) ne for publi

on the impal agency re

permissionhe permissioation on thll be publish

activity is plaformation: y; ted subjects ed with the

ns;

version to thblication;

considerationcation; vity no later

stration andonmental Prvolved admi

ny citizen wiministrative

ter conductiared to reflee project p

e main text ot accepted of the mee

ted to the Mmentary mantial part of


SULTATION

E conventiond access t

g the local, n the public

states the pic review an

ct on envirosponsible fo

n, public revon procedurehe planned hed by the anned.

will be ableactivity (inc

he administr

ns provided

r than in 60 d

d governmerotection aninistrative ag

ll be able to center, whe

ing the pubect all the qproponents of the EIA, athe letter oting, as wel

MoE or the aaterials to tthe EIA.


16

NS

grants pubto justice, national an

c and pub

procedures fnd consultin

onment befoor permissioview must bes). activity aft

administrativ

e to familiarizluding repor

rative agenc

by citizens

days after th

ntal agencied the Ministgencies to th

attend. ere the activi

blic disclosuquestions anin respons

as required. of explanatiol as responsadministrativthe EIA. Th

65

lic in

nd lic

for g,

re on be

er ve

ze rts

cy,

in

he

es try he

ity

re nd se.

If on se ve he

B A 233. (1) Band stakeenvironmorganizatensure itsavailableto the naalso, whe In additiothem withto do soborrowerdisclosur 234. (2) TPrior to disclosesin a mann

•

•

After exeprojects i 235. ADBof the boencouragenvironmdisclosurbetween borrower 9.2 Stat 236. Theaccordingexecutor defined a The Pubdays lateplanned m

ADB-require

Basic Princeholders, so

mental reviewtions and ss accountab, important

ature of the en necessary

on to the afoh informatioo. ADB resprs and relatre and such

Timing of Dmaking dec

s informationner that allow

Upon compossible, and its caFor Categdocumentrelated pawebsite, a

ecuting a loan Categorie

B pays due orrowers andges them t

mental consre. Any info

ADB and trs and relate

tus of Publi

e first draft Ig to the requof the proje

above.

lic Consultaer after the meeting).

Loan2565Modernizati

ment in rela

ciples - ADBo that it mayws and sutakeholders

bility and traninformation project, and

y, seek the o

orementionen regarding pects the cted parties, confidentiali

Disclosure acisions on fn in principlews enough t

mpletion of the project ntegory classgory A andts on enviroarties, suchand promptly

an agreemens A, B and F

consideratiod related parto exclude iderations sormation thathe borrowed parties or

ic Participat

IEE has beeuirements of

ect has arran

tion Meetingdisclosure


ation with P

B welcomes y consider aupervision o to provide nsparency inon environmd while the opinions of c

ed principlesenvironmen

confidentialityand obser

ty.

and Contentfunding and e as indicatetime before d

the screenname, countsification, as Category Bonmental an as IEE or y makes ava

nt, ADB proFI for public

on to the corties, taking

such confsubmitted bat is prohib

er may be din accordan

tion

en submittef Law on En

nged the pub

g has been of the dra


Public Cons

information a diverse ranof projects.

informationn the enviromental review

environmenconcerned o

s, if requestental and socy of the corves concur

t of Disclosdepending

ed below. ADdecisions ar

ning of a ptry, locationwell as the

B projects, nd social co

EIA reportailable the E

ovides the reperusal on t

nfidentiality into accoun

fidential infoby them thabited from pdisclosed once with lega

d to MDF wnvironmentablic participa

conducted ft documen


sultations

provided bynge of opinio

In order ton to ADB anmental revws. This is dntal review iorganizations

ed by third cial considerommercial arrently the

ed Informaton the nat

DB endeavore made on f

project, ADB, an outline reasons for ADB publis

onsiderations, ExecutiveIA reports et

esults of its the ADB web

of the commnt their compormation froat may latepublic disclonly with eithal requireme

who has in tl Impact Pe

ation as per

in MDF offict and anno


y concerned ons and infoo encourag

at an early view processdone in wayis in progres and stakeh

parties, ADrations withi

and other mprinciples o

tion ture of the

ors to disclosfunding i.e.

B discloses,and sector othat classific

shes the stans by the be Summarytc.

environmenbsite.

mercial and petitive relatom any doer be subjeosure in th

her the agrents.

turn Disclosrmits (2008)the Georgia

ce on Marchouncement r


16

organizationormation in ige concernestage and

s, ADB makeys appropriass. ADB ma

holders.

B will providin its capaci

matters of thof informatio

project, ADse informatio

as soon aof the projeccation; andatus of majorrowers anon the AD

tal reviews

other mattetionships, anocuments oect to pub

he agreemeeement of th

sed the repo). MDF as than procedure

h 1, 2012 (5regarding th

66

ns its ed to es

ate ay

de ity he on

DB on

as ct,

or nd DB

of

ers nd on lic

ent he

ort he es

50 he

Series ofthe Land in Annex by MDF. Protoco

Tbilisi On MarcPonichathe officeThe mee Represe

x Nre

x Dre

a represfor Geor

x Iraa represMinistry

x Aas well a

x Tax Irix Gx Gx Zux Dx Vx Rx Ilgand cx Tax Mx S

The meeand reseof the environmpublic, wthe Projephysical studied. substancbiodivers

f separate mAcquisition 7. Disclosu

ol of publicand Pon

ch 1, 2012la and Pone of Georgieting was a

entatives of ikoloz Sos

esettlement david Baindu

esettlement dsentative of rgia” akli Kaviladzsentative oof Econommiran Katsaas NGOs anamar Gugusine Svanidze

Gia Gvilava - Gia Aladashv

urab Gvelesavid Khidesaleri Gelash

R. Sharashengar Abdulaecitizens: amar Bakhu

Manon Bokuchakro Mirota

eting was oettlement demeeting a

mental protwho informeect. He not and sociaIn particula

ces, naturasity, cultura

Loan2565Modernizati

meetings withand Resettlre of the LA

c review ofnichala-Rus

2, the publnichala-Rusan Municip

attended by

the Georgiselia, a spdepartment;urashvili, a department;the environ

ze; of the Spa

mics and Suadze; nd consultinshvili - Aarhue - AssociatiInternationa

vili - ‘Informasiani - Internaheli - MAMIS

hvili - ENGURnidze - VBR v - AKKORD

urauli; chava and adze.

opened by epartment and presetection coned the publted that wheal environmar, they stu

al radiation al heritage,


h affected stlement Plan

ARP and furt

f the EIA Rstavi secti

ic review ostavi sectionpal Develop

the:

ian Municippecialist of specialist

nmental pro

atial Plannistainable D

ng companus Centre in ion “Green Aal Transpareation Centre ational TranSONI LTD. RI 2006 LTDLTD.

D.

the speciaNikoloz Sonted Mr.

nsultation fulic about then drafting

ment of theudied the abackgrounsocial aspe


takeholders . The minuteher public co

Report of coons of Tbi

of the EIA ns of Tbilis

pment Fund

pal Developthe enviro

of the env

otection co

ng and BuDevelopmen

nies: Georgia;

Alternative”ency Georgiaof Social Resparency Ge

D.

alist of the oselia, who

Irakli Kavund “World

he EIA and the EIA re

e design setmosphericd, noise pr

ects, etc.


have been ces of all thesonsultation m

onstructiolisi-Rustav

MReport of

si-Rustavi sd.

pment Fundonmental p

vironmental

nsultation f

uilding Polnt of Georg

a eforms” eorgia

environmeinformed thiladze, a d Experienrelevant report, the ba

ection of Tc air qualityropagation)


conducted inse meetingsmeeting will

on of Tbilisvi speedwa

March 1, 20constructio

speedway t

d: protection a

protection

fund “World

icy Departgia:

ntal protecthe attendeerepresentace for Geo

eport withinackground bilisi-Rusta

y (pollution ), surface w


16

n relation wis are provide

be organize

i-Ponichalay

012 on of Tbilisook place

analysis an

analysis an

d Experienc

ment of th

tion analyses of the aiative of thorgia” to th the limits status of th

avi road wawith harmf

water qualit

67

th ed ed

a

si-at

nd

nd

ce

he

sis m

he he of

he as ful ty,

By consdegree environmAt last, process,

x Thgudu

x Thlaroacqupuco

x Thimemta

x ThprDspenthcoexRcoan

After the possibilityresettlemresettlemIn this reresettlemwhich wilwill be sDevelopm The inforannex.

idering the of impact

mental manthe report

, in particulahe Project uaranteed inue carrying che general

ands and assoad for the ccomplisheduestion will ublished afteonsultations he impleme

mpact and ismissions, no

aking the mehe Project rotected areespite this, pace plantsndangered s

he corridor dorridor, marxtent possib

Removing theoncrete plannd Rustavi M

presentatioy to express

ment problemment not infor

spect, I. Kavment issues all thoroughlysubject to thment.

rmation abo

Loan2565Modernizati

works to band neede

nagement ater commuar: has a sign

ncreased tracapacity; negative effsociated prophysical an

d in line wbe discusseer the relevwith the imp

entation of ts mostly relaoise, etc. w

easures undeis accompl

eas, habitatsa certain a). The possspecies (e.gemarcation

rking the treble and ace Red-Listen of compenMunicipalitie

n of the EIAs their own m not consirmed about viladze expla study is u

y cover all quhe public re

out the ques


e accomplied mitigatioand monitornicated ab

nificant posiaffic flows (lo

fect of the Poperty and bnd legal entith the Woed in the Rant documepacted peopthe Project ated to the c

what can beer the manaished on sts of ecolog

amount of trsibility of d. chestnut trby the build

ees to be feccomplishingd Species fnsatory plans and Minist

A report, theopinions an

dered undethe public reained to thenderway anuestions of review in line

stions and p


shed, the ton measurring of the pbout the co

tive social-eocal and tra

Project is asbusinesses, tities. Resetrld Bank ru

Resettlementent is draftedple will be org

is not relacommon fac

e mitigated bgement plantrongly tran

gical value orees will be amage to i

rees, Plot's Eing contractelled, avoidig the procfrom the Nanting must btry of Enviro

e participantsnd notes. A

er the EIA review was pe author of td a resettlem

resettlemente with the

proposal dur


types of expres were splanned actonclusions

economic imansit) at the

ssociated wloss of propttlement andules and Gt Action Plad. During thganized indited to any

ctors of consby observinn. sformed urbor eco-systefelled (mos

ndividual treElm, Aldar ptor, the proping the prot

cedures envatural Envirobe developednmental Pro

s of the pubA question areport and tut. the questionment action t. As soon asrequirement

ring the pub


pected posspecified. Ttions are drdeveloped

mpact evideexpense of

with the impaperty or incod compensa

Georgian legn in detail,

he documenvidually andparticular e

struction wog the buildi

ban landscaems in the stly the alonees of any ine) is not exer cadastre tected specvisaged by onment are d and agree

otection.

blic review wabout the rethe populati

that in conplan is bein

s the said plts of the A

blic review is


16

sible impacThe plans rafted. d in the EI

enced by ththe road wi

act on privaome along thations will bgislation. Thwhich will bt drafting, th

d in groups. environment

orks, like dusing rules an

apes with nimpact are

ng-road greered-listed

xcluded. Aftstudies in th

cies as to ththe Law

necessary. ed with Tbil

were given thasons for thon subject

nection to thng developelan is ready,

Asian Bank

s given in th

68

ct, of

IA

he th

ate he be his be he

tal st, nd

no ea. en or er he he of A

isi

he he to

he ed,

it of

he

IEE

Rep

ort

Info

rma

No

.

Au

tho

1

T. G

ugu

and

I. S

Alte

rnat

2 T.

Gug

uan

d I.

SA

ltern

at

3 I.

Svan

ati

on

ab

ou

t th

ors

of

qu

esti

on

san

d p

rop

osals

ushv

ili (A

arhu

s C

Sva

nidz

e (G

reen

tiv

e)

ushv

ili (A

arhu

s C

Sva

nidz

e (G

reen

tiv

e)

nidz

e (G

reen

Alte

he

qu

es

tio

ns

P

on

ich

ala

a,

no

tes

Cen

tre)

The

E

Cen

tre)

Whe

rere

view

erna

tive)

The

pal

tern

aen

viro

ther

e

an

d p

rop

os

al

an

d P

on

ich

ala

Qu

est

Not

es a

IA re

port

was

not

e th

e in

form

atio

n w

was

pub

lishe

d?

pres

ente

d E

IAs

ativ

es o

f ea

ch s

onm

enta

l im

pact

is n

o du

e ca

lcul

atl d

uri

ng

th

e p

a-R

usta

vi s

ec

tio

n

and

prop

osal

dur

it a

ccep

tible

for t

h

abou

t the

pub

lic

do n

ot c

onsi

der

sect

ion

or e

xpe

t as

sess

men

t, tio

n or

val

idat

ion.

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

ub

lic

revie

w o

cti

on

s o

f T

bili

ng th

e pu

blic

rev

hem

Th

e E

IA re

rese

ttlem

eof

env

iron

The

EIA

Geo

rgia

(P4,

20

11)

Env

ironm

ein

cha

pter

the

give

n ab

stra

ct o

desc

riptio

nof

impa

ct,

rese

ttlem

eIn

add

ition

bein

g de

vD

urin

g th

epe

ople

wil

At p

rese

ntbe

pub

lish

pres

umab

As

for

thac

cura

te i

plan

as

soE

xpla

natio

in th

e ne

wsi

tes.

th

e ec

ted

and

.

The

mo d

alte

rnat

ive

The

EIA

cbe

ing

divi

dal

tern

ativ

eco

mpl

ex a:

En

gin

ee

rin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

of

the

EIA

Rep

si-

Ru

sta

vi s

p

iew

ep

ort w

as n

ot a

ccen

t iss

ues.

As

the

men

tal,

soci

al a

n

is d

rafte

d in

the

Pro

visi

on o

f the

Ean

d A

DB

re

quen

tal

Exa

min

atio

r 5.3

of t

he d

ocum

form

at.

In p

artic

of th

e m

ain

data

kn

of n

umbe

r of

th,

type

of

busi

nes

ent p

rinci

ples

. n,

the

expl

anat

ion

velo

ped

to b

e pu

e do

cum

ent

dra

l be

orga

nize

d in

t, th

e re

settl

emen

hed

at th

e en

d of

bl

y he

ld a

t the

beg

he E

IA/IE

E d

ocu

info

rmat

ion

deliv

eoo

n as

at t

he c

urr

on: t

he in

form

atio

wsp

aper

“The

24

dern

E

IA

prin

cies

and

not

nom

ina

cont

ains

the

exp

lde

d in

to 3

sub

-se

es o

f 2n

d se

ctio

anal

ysis

of

the

em

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

po

rt o

f co

ns

trp

ee

dw

ay

An

sw

er

cept

able

for t

hem

ey e

xpla

ined

, EIA

nd a

ll ex

pect

ed im

e fo

rmat

con

sist

eE

nviro

nmen

tal P

roire

men

ts

for

Ca

n).

The

rese

ttlem

men

t to

the

exte

nul

ar,

chap

ter

5.3

know

n at

the

deve

he a

ffect

ed le

gal

ss o

bjec

ts a

nd b

r

n ab

out a

sep

ara

ublis

hed

and

pub

fting

, th

e co

nsu

divi

dual

ly a

nd in

nt

act

ion

plan

is

Mar

ch o

f 201

2, a

ginn

ing

of A

pril.

um

ent,

its f

inal

er

ed b

y th

e te

amre

nt s

tage

. on

abo

ut th

e pl

anho

ur” a

nd o

n A

ar

ples

m

ean

con

al e

xecu

tion

of p

anat

ion

abou

t th

ectio

ns. A

t pre

seon

of

the

road

iex

istin

g ro

ad c

oMa

na

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

ruc

tio

n o

f T

bi

m, a

s it

did

not c

ovA

shou

ld c

over

the

mpa

cts.

ent

with

the

leg

otec

tion

Age

ncy

oat

egor

y B

pr

ojec

men

t is

sues

are

nt

due

for t

he d

oc3

(pp.

84-

89)

con

elop

ing

stag

e of

Ean

d ph

ysic

al e

nrie

f de

scrip

tion

o

ate

rese

ttlem

ent a

blic

ly r

evie

wed

wlta

tions

with

the

gr

oups

. be

ing

com

plet

ed

and

its p

ublic

rev

vers

ion

shal

l in

m d

rafti

ng t

he r

es

nned

rev

iew

was

rh

us C

entre

and

M

nsid

erin

g th

e m

proc

edur

es.

he P

roje

ct o

f Tb

ilen

t, an

inte

nse

sts

unde

rway

, co

vor

ridor

and

oth

epe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 16

9

lisi-

ver t

he

e an

alys

is

isla

tion

of

of O

ctob

er

cts

(Initi

al

disc

usse

d cu

men

ts o

f ns

ider

s th

e E

IA re

port,

tit

ies,

kin

d f

the

AD

B

actio

n pl

an

was

mad

e.

impa

cted

and

it w

ill ie

w w

ill b

e

nclu

de t

he

settl

emen

t

publ

ishe

d M

DF

web

-

mea

ning

ful

isi-R

usta

vi

tudy

of t

he

verin

g th

e r

poss

ible

IEE

Rep

ort

4 I.

Svann

idze

(Gre

en A

lte

erna

tive)

The

r epl

ots

lco

mpe

requ

ireea

ch f

trans

pfix

thisep

ort s

ays

that

pe

egal

ized

are

not

en

satio

n. T

his

is a

emen

ts. T

he re

pofa

mily

will

rece

ive

porta

tion.

Whi

ch c

s am

ount

?

eopl

e no

t hav

ing

tel

igib

le fo

r ag

ains

t the

AD

B

ort a

lso

says

that

e

200

GE

L fo

r cr

iteria

wer

e us

ed

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

rout

es

(inan

alys

is o

stud

y of

thA

s fo

r se

cth

e P

roje

cro

ad a

nd

wer

e no

t mTh

e m

aps

sect

ions

fle

ft) a

nd

whe

re th

ein

gen

eral

with

in t

h esp

eedw

ayP

onic

hala

the

settl

edcl

early

se

eval

uatio

nas

soci

ated

and

the

aar

e si

gnifi

exce

ptio

n ex

istin

g r o

Des

pite

thof

Pon

ich

Ana

lysi

s in

form

atio

alte

rnat

ive

thei

r

d to

The

repo

rha

ving

the

the

cont

rax

Al

pr prx

Th co co th: E

ng

ine

erin

g,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

nclu

ding

en

viro

nof

alte

rnat

ive

rout

ehe

men

tione

d se

cct

ion

1 (T

bilis

i-Po

ct e

nvis

ages

the

mno

t th

e co

nstru

cm

eani

ngfu

l alte

rns

show

n in

the

follo

ws

a na

rrow

st

eep

mou

ntai

n re

is n

o ei

ther

ne

, the

impa

ct o

n th

e no

rms

or e

vey.

Th

ere

is

no

-Rus

tavi

, bu

t a n

d ar

eas

thus

incr

eee

n on

th

e m

an.

As

a ru

le,

the

d w

ith l

ess

impa

alte

rnat

ives

are

sca

nt li

mita

tions

(t

is th

e 2nd

sec

tion

oad

is li

mite

d by

dhe

abo

ve-m

entio

nal

a-R

usta

vi s

ect

of

Alte

rnat

ives

n

mak

ing

the

e ro

utes

eve

n cl

eart

does

not

con

taei

r pl

ots

lega

lized

ary,

par

agra

ph 5

.3ll

affe

cted

pe

opro

perty

, w

ill r

ece

roje

ct m

eans

of s

hose

us

ing

the

ompe

nsat

ion

for

ompe

nsat

ed f

or

hem

on

the

give

n em

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion M

of

the

Tbili

si-R

ed

bri

d

nmen

tal

and

res

es is

pai

d m

uch

act

ion

and

EIA

. on

icha

la)

and

sec

mod

erni

zatio

n an

ctio

n of

new

sec

ativ

es fo

r the

pre

e EI

A,

clea

rly s

hco

rrido

r be

twee

slop

e of

Sha

vna

eed,

or p

ossi

bilit

y he

env

ironm

enta

n le

ss t

han

alo

topo

grap

hica

ll ny

rer

outin

g is

as

easi

ng th

e im

pact

aps

that

ne

eds

e ex

tens

ion

of t

hac

t on

the

nat

ura

soug

ht i

n th

e ex

cte

chni

cal o

r so

cia

n of

the

road

(Po

dens

ely

popu

late

dne

d an

d cl

arity

of

tion

incl

udes

exp

with

ad

ditio

nal

unpr

omis

ing

n aar

er.

ain

any

info

rmat

id

are

not

elig

ible

3 cl

early

say

s th

apl

e,

notw

ithst

and

eive

the

diff

eren

tub

sist

ence

and

lie

land

ille

gally

r th

e lo

ss

of

the

loss

of

any

land

. The

y w

ill aM

ana

ge

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge (

Aze

rba

ijan

i Bo

rde

settl

emen

t as

peat

tent

ion

to in

the

ctio

n 3

(Pon

icha

land

ext

ensi

on o

f th

ctio

ns,

and

diffe

rees

ente

d P

roje

ct.

how

tha

t Tb

ilisi-

en t

he r

iver

Mtk

vav

aba

ridge

(on

of

any

alte

rnat

ive

l and

soc

ial e

nvir

ong

othe

r se

ctio

limita

tion

for

thss

ocia

ted

with

pt o

f res

ettle

men

t.s

no

spec

ial

qhe

exi

stin

g ro

ad

al a

nd s

ocia

l en

vce

ptio

nal

case

wal

/env

ironm

enta

l)ni

chal

a se

ctio

n),

d ar

eas

from

its

bf t

he is

sue,

the

repe

nded

cha

pter

gr

aphi

c an

d q

atur

e of

th

e s

on im

plyi

ng t

hat

e fo

r co

mpe

nsat

ioat

: ding

th

eir

lega

l t

aid

to r

eser

ve

ving

sta

ndar

ds.

y,

will

not

rec

land

, bu

t th

eyot

her

prop

erty

al

so r

ecei

ve th

e ape

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 17

0

ects

). Th

e e

feas

ibili

ty

a-R

usta

vi),

he e

xist

ing

ent

rout

es

-Pon

icha

la

vari

(on

its

its r

ight

), e

rout

e, a

s ro

nmen

t is

ns o

f th

e he

se

ctio

n pe

netra

ting

Thi

s is

so

uant

itativ

e is

a p

riori

viro

nmen

t, w

hen

ther

e ).

Suc

h an

w

here

the

both

sid

es.

evis

ed IE

E

rela

ted

to

uant

itativ

e ea

rch

for

thos

e no

t on

, bu

t on

right

s to

th

eir

pre-

ceiv

e th

e y

will

be

ow

ned

by

alow

ance

s

IEE

Rep

ort

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb to

In a

ddre

quir

regi

ste

reco

gnno

t re

com

petre

es o

Th

e v

(para

.‘T

he

mon

etve

hicl

rest

ores

tabl

subs

isfa

mily

The

sR

eset

AD

B b

2012

m

enti o

docu

m“T

he

addi

ti om

onth

trans

itac

cord

At t

hecl

ause

itsel

f can

d p

full

rep

At l

asof

IEE

and

nin

clud

fam

ili e

: E

ng

ine

eri

ng,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

o m

aint

ain

or im

prdi

tion,

we

wou

ldem

ents

, th

ose

ered

pro

perty

rig

nize

the

land

pro

ecei

ve

the

com

ensa

tion

for

the

or s

ourc

e of

inco

m

vers

ion

of

the P

. 5.3

, p

. 87.

Co

mfa

milie

s su

bjec

tary

aid

of

200

e to

tra

nspo

rt th

e th

eir

inco

me

solis

h on

esel

f at

st

ence

min

imum

y.

" said

cita

tion

wa

ttlem

ent

Fram

ewo

by M

DF.

Afte

r di

and

prio

r to

th e

oned

fra

me

dom

ent f

orm

ulat

es th

fam

ilies

subj

econ

al a

id to

cov

er

hs’

subs

iste

nce

mtio

nal

perio

d.”

Tdi

ngly

con

tain

this

e sa

me

time,

we

e ta

lks

abou

t the

co

vers

the

com

pere

mis

es, t

rees

) apl

acem

ent c

ost.

t, th

e ci

ted

frag m

E c

onsi

derin

g th

e no

t ab

out

real

im

e th

e de

scrip

tion

es f

rom

the

ir pl

acem

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion

Mo

f th

e T

bili

si-R

ed

bri

d

rove

thei

r liv

ing

st l

ike

to e

xpla

in

occu

pyin

g th

e gh

t of

the

lan

d o

oper

ty r

ight

with

pe

nsat

ion

for

lalo

ss o

f ha

rves

tm

e.

Pro

ject

pre

sen

tep

en

sati

on

Leg

ibct

to

ph

ysic

al

Gel

per

fam

ily

he f

amily

bel

ongi

ourc

e fo

r 3

mon

ta

new

lo

catio

for

3 m

onth

s am

s ta

ken

from

th

ork”

(20

08)

agre

sclo

sure

of t

he f

e st

art

up o

f pr

epoc

umen

ts

wer

ehe

sai

d cl

ause

as

ct

to

phys

ical

th

eir c

ost o

f tra

nm

inim

um (

3x31

1 Th

e fin

al,

corre

s cl

ause

. w

ould

like

to o

n cad

ditio

nal a

id o

nen

satio

n of

the

loan

d on

e-ye

ar h

arv

men

t is

take

n fro

mel

igib

ility

prin

cipl

em

pact

s. T

he l

ist

of t

he p

hysi

cal r

ce o

f re

side

nce.

Man

age

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge

(A

zerb

aija

ni B

ord

e

tand

ards

. th

at i

n lin

e w

ithla

nd

illega

lly

or a

ny o

ther

leg

aits

fur

ther

reg

istr

and,

bu

t w

ill re

t, bu

ildin

gs a

nd

ed

fo

r th

e p

ub

lb

ilit

y)

sa

ys t

hat:

re

settl

emen

t w

ifo

r tra

nspo

rtatio

ings

) an

d m

onet

ths,

as

the

aid

reon

). Th

is

amou

mou

ntin

g to

1.1

1

he “

Land

Acq

uis

eed

and

appr

oved

irst d

raft

of IE

E i

para

tion

of t

he L

up

date

d.

The

s fo

llow

s:

rese

ttlem

ent

wi

nspo

rtatio

n (3

11 G

Gel

) to

hel

p al

lct

ed

vers

ion

o f

ce a

gain

und

erlin

nly,

whi

le th

e co

mos

t pro

perty

(lan

dve

st o

f ann

ual p

la

m th

e pa

rt of

par

aes

app

rove

d fo

r tof

rea

l im

pact

s re

settl

emen

t of t

hN

o su

ch c

ase

tape

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 17

1

h th

e A

DB

(w

ith

no

al b

asis

to

ratio

n),

will

ec

eive

th

e pr

emis

es,

lic r

evie

w

ll re

ceiv

e on

(to

hire

ta

ry a

id t

o en

dere

d to

nt

is

th

e 2

Gel

per

sitio

n an

d d

with

the

in

Jan

uary

LA

RP,

the

e

revi

sed

ll re

ceiv

e G

el) a

nd 3

ev

iate

the

f

EIA

w

ill

ne th

at th

is

mpe

nsat

ion

, bui

ldin

gs

ants

at t

he

agra

ph 5

.3

the

Pro

ject

do

es n

ot

he a

ffect

ed

akes

pla

ce

IEE

Rep

ort

5 6 7

A q

ueW

her

durin

gth

at

mun

i csi

tuat

requ

ial

rea d

In

adpl

ace

be in

d W

as

the

nef

fect

Why

tre

pres

on th

e

estio

n ab

out t

he w

re a

nd h

ow w

ill t

g th

e w

ork

be p

lath

e w

aste

w

ill

cipa

l la

ndfil

ls,

wtio

n it

is

impo

sre

men

t, as

th

e dy

ove

rfille

d.

dditi

on,

the

pla

emen

t of

the

haz

dica

ted.

ther

e an

y st

udy

une

ed f

or t

his

road

t?

this

mee

ting

is

sent

ativ

es o

f the

e

rese

ttlem

ent i

ss

was

te w

as p

ut:

the

was

te g

ener

aced

? Th

e EI

A s

tbe

pl

aced

at

w

hile

in

th

e cu

rss

ible

to

m

eet

exis

ting

land

fi

ce

and

man

neza

rdou

s w

aste

m

unde

rtake

n to

spe

d? I

f ye

s, w

hat

i

not

atte

nded

by

orga

niza

tion

wor

sues

?

Lo

an

25

655

-GE

O:

Mod

ern

iza

tion

of

Tb

unde

r Th

e fin

al E

cons

ulta

tiode

scrip

tion

rate

d ta

tes

the

rren

t th

is

ll is

r of

m

ust

The

Eits

co

need

sIE

E r

eco

nstr

kind

s tra

nsp

will

be

of th

e A

s fo

acco

rdco

mpa

ecify

s

its

Yes

, the

sde

velo

pme

the

rk

ing

The

mee

tan

swer

s a

and

Mr.

Atim

e, w

e re

settl

eme

form

at (

inre

settl

eme

mee

ting

a: E

ng

ine

eri

ng,P

rocu

reb

ilisi

-Rust

avi

Se

ctio

n o

the

Pro

ject

. E

IA v

aria

nts

are

aon

s w

ith th

e po

pun

of re

settl

emen

t E

IA s

ays

that

ther

eon

serv

atio

n pr

oje

s th

e co

verin

g of

tec

omm

ends

usi

nru

ctio

n of

Tbi

lisi-R

of e

nviro

nmen

tapo

rting

the

iner

t me

redu

ced

and

onco

nstru

ctio

n in

er

or

the

othe

r w

adi

ng

to

EIA,

su

anie

s un

der t

he a

stud

y w

as a

ccom

pen

t and

ear

ly s

tag

ting

is a

ttend

ed

abou

t th

e re

settl

eA

vto

Okr

omch

edw

ould

lik

e to

uen

t is

sues

with

tnd

ivid

ually

and

ien

t ac

tion

plan

dat

the

end

of M

arcem

ent,

Co

nst

ruct

ion

Mo

f th

e T

bili

si-R

ed

bri

d

atta

ched

by

the

bul

atio

n as

an

anne

prin

cipl

es a

gree

de

is a

dec

isio

n to

ec

t w

ill be

de

veth

e cl

osed

land

filng

the

ine

rt m

ate

Rus

tavi

roa

d fo

r al

ben

efits

: on

th

mat

eria

l fro

m b

orr

n th

e ot

her

hand

,rt

mat

eria

ls w

ill be

ste,

in

clud

ing

duc

h w

aste

sh

alag

reem

ent.

pl

ishe

d at

the

ear

ges

of th

e pr

ojec

t

by t

he r

epre

sen

emen

t is

sues

(M

lishv

ili (in

depe

ndun

derli

ne t

hat

the

the

affe

cted

peo

pn

focu

s gr

oups

)do

cum

ents

will

bch

/at t

he b

egin

ninM

an

age

me

nt

and

Su

pd

ge

(A

zerb

aija

ni B

ord

e

roch

ures

dur

ing

tex

, whi

ch g

ives

ad

with

the

AD

B.

clos

e up

Iagl

uji l

elop

ed.

The

col w

ith in

ert f

ill m

aer

ial

gene

rate

d d

this

pur

pose

. Th

he o

ne h

and,

the

row

pits

to c

over

, t

he p

robl

em o

f e

sim

ply

settl

ed.

omes

tic,

haza

rdl

be

plac

ed

by

rly s

tage

of t

he p

rt p

repa

ratio

n.

ntat

ives

aut

horiz

eM

r. D

. B

aind

uras

hde

nt a

udito

r)).

At

e co

nsul

tatio

ns

ple

take

s pl

ace

), w

hile

the

rev

iee

orga

nize

d at

ang

of A

pril.

pe

rvis

ion

er)

Roa

d 17

2

the

a de

taile

d

andf

ill an

d ns

erva

tion

ater

ial.

The

durin

g th

e is

has

two

e ne

ed f

or

the

land

fill

plac

emen

t

dous

, et

c.,

y lic

ense

d

roje

ct

ed t

o gi

ve

hvili

(MD

F)

the

sam

e ab

out

the

in a

noth

er

ew o

f th

e a

sepa

rate

10. GR 237. enviroactiviticonstrdisturbthat arfor the 238. MThe adregionstakehand nuadminverificathe affsupplecommresolu 239. Mgrievawith thresponprocesenviromeetingrievacomm

( ( (M (m (a (iic

At therespon In parresidefrom t

RIEVANCE

During imponmental haies. For exaruction vehicbances; cultre likely to ae Project to d

MDF has ovdministrative

nal (Rustaviholders mayuisance to tistrative boation of the fected local ement the unication wition cycle.

Moe,Rustavances that hhe requiremense by impss, MDF w

onmental comngs and disc

ance collectunication) M

(i) Send its r

(ii) Involve M

(iii) ReceiveMoE/City Ha

(iv) Submit tmeasures;

(v) During 1about the ex

(vi) If the information information, considered f

e conclusionnse of MDF

rallel the coent office inthe early st

LoMod

REDRESS

plementationzards and dample, intencle flow; wasural conflictsrise from thedeal with bot

verall respone bodies res, Gardaban

y send their the Project Idies responcases descpopulation. initial informith the affect

i Mayor/s Oave been reents of the Alementing a

will inform smpliance anclose on thetion and r

MDF will exe

representativ

MoE and loca

e experts’ all experts);

to the const

10 days aftexpert’s decis

complainanin support othe subseq

final.

of this procor administr

ommunity isn Tbilisi in oages.


MECHANIS

n of the Pdisputes onnsive schedste; noise as between me Project actth the enviro

nsibility for pponsible for

ni) municipagrievances,mplementat

nsible for ecribed in recMDF will re

mation with ted persons

Office and Geceived fromAdministrativa project-spstakeholdersnd grievancee MDF web-response. cute followin

ves to check

al municipal

conclusion

tructing com

er receiving sion and app

nt is dissatiof their casequent decisi

cess, if the rative bodies

s encouragerder to ena


SM

Project, the entitlement

dule of consand air pollutmigrant worktivities. A Gr

onmental and

project impleenvironmen

al offices (g related to ttion Unit (PI

environmentaceived grievecord all rec

the descris and final co

Gardabani Gm populationve Code of

pecific GR ps and the e redress. M-site the conUpon receng actions:

k the claims

ities when a

(from MDF

mpany and o

the grievanplied correcti

isfied with . After consion of the M

affected stas, the grieva

ed to submable ADB co


re might bt processesstruction acttion from cokers, are somrievance Redd social issu

ementation antal protectiogamgeoba). the project-iU), represenal protectionances and f

ceived grievaption of allonclusion af

Gamgeoba an or other inGeorgia. MD

procedure. Dpublic that

MDF will prontact details iving a gr

and monitor

and where ap

F personnel

operator an

ce, inform tve measure

the decisioidering the a

MDF/MoE a

akeholder ornce may the

it their grievontrol the g


be several s will occur tivities; inaponstruction ame of the endress mecha

ues of the Pr

and environon are MoE a

The affectinduced envnted by MDn. CMC is for routine cances in a g corrective

fter completi

are obliged nterested paDF as the PDuring the

the MDFovide at the

of the persrievance (in

r the situatio

ppropriate;

, independe

instruction r

the affected es;

on, they mappeal and nd participa

r person is en be directe

vances direrievance re


issues reladue to the

ppropriate tiactivities; ecnvironmentaanism will beroject.

mental comand Tbilicy Cted populativironmental F, or directlused by M

communicatgrievance bo

measures, on of the gr

to respondarties in accoPIU will facili

public consis responspublic cons

ons responsn written

on;

ent experts

regarding co

person or p

ay present the support

ating munici

not satisfieded to the cou

ectly to the esolution pr

rvision ) Road

173

ated to Project

ming of cological al issues e set up

pliance. City and on and impacts y to the

MDF for ion with ook and

further rievance

d to the ordance tate the

sultation sible for sultation sible for or oral

and/or

orrective

persons

further ing new pality is

d by the urt.

ADB rocess

The a

Regi

Title

Nam

Cont

Plea

prefe

com

(Mai

mail)

The

desi

com

Desc

Date

Wha

affected per

ion#

of the Pro

me, Last na

tact Inform

se indicat

erable mea

municatio

l, Telepho

)

lang

rable for

municatio

cribe the g

e of Negoti

at is the ba

LoMod

rsons are a

Compla

oject

me

mation

te the

ans of

n

ne, E-

�

�

�

guage

r the

n

� � �

grievance/c

ation:

sis of your


dvised to p

aints and G

Mail: P

________

________

________

________

Telephon

________

E-

mail:____

__

Georgian

English

Russian

claim:

Resoluti

r claim?


provide their

Grievance

Please i

__________

__________

__________

__________

ne:

__________

__________

What iclaim?

ion of Nego


r grievance

Submissio

ndicate

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

is the com

otiation:


es in a form

on Form

the po

__________

__________

__________

______

__________

__________

mplaint abo


at given be

stal add

__________

__________

__________

__________

_________

out? What

rvision ) Road

174

elow:

dress:

_____

_____

_____

_____

_____

is the

Prop

1. Mi 6 G Fa2. MuAddr(995 Fa E-Conte-maPhon3. A 39Tel: +Fax: Co e- Ph

posed Add

inistry of EnGulua str. 0ax: 2727237unicipal Deress: 150 D32) 243700

ax: (99532)-mail: mdf@tac person: ail: npatarasne:

Asian Develo9A Chavch+995 322 2+995 322 2

ontact Persmail: tpapuhone: 2250

LoMod

resses for

nvironment 0114 Tbilisi7/ Phone: 2

evelopment David Agma01; 24370022437077

@mdf.org.geNino Patar

shvili@mdf

opment Baavadze Ave

250619 to 2250622.

son: Tea Pauashvili@ad619


r Submissi

of Georgia, Georgia

2727200 Fund of Ge

ashenebeli a2; 2437003

e rashvili (envf.org.ge;

nk/ Residee. 0162 Tb

21

apuashvili db.org


on of Griev

a

eorgia ave. 0112 T3; 2437004

vironmenta

nt Office in ilisi, Georgi


vance Form

Tbilisi, Geo

al and socia

Georgia ia


ms

rgia

al specialist


);

rvision ) Road

175

11. C

The pthe comade all ensepara The mtranspcarryinconstrmodertranspmuch particuof 120 In shojob opimpacand m At this131 Arelatedamouncommproducmajor 3 petrobusinecatego The Lhousegroupsthe losaccordsevere Const

x x

Theseberms No setrees woperatdescrishouldbe maand grbe fac

CONCLUSIO

resent IEE ronstruction ato mitigate

nvironmentalately in LAR

major positivport flows anng capacityructed, the crn road me

port the cargimportant fo

ularly for the0000 residen

ort term perspportunities t related to

manageable b

s stage, it cAHs are affed to permannt 30 are legercial land ctive trees. Tstructures aol filling statess facilitiesory A and ne

Land Acquiseholds, invens. Compensst assets. Ading to the ely affected

ruction relatErosion froErosion ofopen drain

e impacts shs, sediment c

ensitive ecolwill be felledtions, immeption of tree

d be made toarked. As mreenery plan

cilitated with

LoMod

ONS AND R

reveals that activities anexpected nel aspects o

RP.

ve outcomesnd local resy of the roacapital of Geeeting the io and passe

or the sociale population nts of Rustav

spective, the(about 100 the construby applicatio

can be sumected directlnent take of galizable and

plots. AcqThe main imand some anions. 6 legal

s According eeds the pre

ition and Rentory of los

sation and reAll the affect

Georgian households

ed potential om road cutsf lands belons. hould be mcatchment b

ogical habitd. Additional ediately aftees to be felleo avoid any

minimum the ntation progthe proportio


RECOMMEN

there will bd normal oegative enviof the Proje

s of the Proidents, espead. After th

eorgia will benternationalengers to Tbl-economic dand industr

vi work or stu

e project willnew jobs c

ction nuisanon good con

marized, thaly and 33 a132 private

d 102 with fquisition of

mpact is relancillary facilil entities willto the ADB

eparation of a

esettlement ses, descripehabilitation ted householegislation will be prov

impacts: s and fills anow the road

itigated by basins etc

ats are reprecological s

er the demaed should beindividual trsame amou

ram. Compon of 1:10;


NDATIONS

e minor negperations ofronmental imect road. T

oject will beecially for thhe further e linked to A standards.

bilisi and Bladevelopmenries in the cudy in Tbilis

l also have scould be av

nce (dust, emstruction pra

at this projeare the empe land plots full registrati

only 5 lanated to the loities will be d suffer in terB SPS 2009a Land Acqu

Plan (LARPption of socplan will be

olds will be and ADB Sided with the

nd temporarybed receiv

anti-erosion

resented in studies are rarcation of e conductedree of red daunt of trees pensatory p


gative and taf the road smpacts. TheThe resettle

e safe drivinhe Phonichasections of

Azerbaijan a. This roadack Sea portnt of the popity of Rustavi.

some benefvailable for missions, noactices.

ct will affectployees losiwith total aron. No crop

nd plots is oss of structdestroyed, irms of busin9 this sub-puisition and R

P) will providial status aelaborated provided wiSPS 2009 e additional

y sedimentatving concent

n measures:

the project required priothe constru

d within the ata specie, t

should be lanting of th


angible posisection. Rece IEE and in

ement aspec

ng conditionala-Rustavi s

the road and its capitad will be usts. The desigpulation of Kvi and Gard

it for local polocal reside

oise) is tem

t as minimung their jobrea of 9858s are cultivaassociated

tures and buncluding 1 cess impacts

project is thResettlemen

de detailed and identificaupon completh the adeqrequirementallowances.

tion of naturtrated outflo

temporary

area. Howeor to start upuction corriddemarcated

the trees to planted und

he red data t


itive impactscommendationcluded EMcts are add

ns for transisection, andare design

al Baku throsed to comgn road is a

Kvemo Kartliabani region

opulation, pents). The nporary, insig

m 164 housbs.Project im0 sqm. Ou

ated on the awith losses

usinesses. Incar washing s: permanenhus classifient Plan (LAR

census of aation of vuletion of valu

quate compets. Vulnerab

ral drainage ow from cov

drainage s

ever, XX amp of the consdor. The ca

d corridor, albe cut downder the landtree species

rvision ) Road

176

s due to ons are P cover dressed

it motor d higher ed and

ough the mfortably

lso very region, n. Many

roviding negative gnificant

seholds: mpact is t of this affected s of 54 n total 4 station, t loss of d as of

RP).

affected lnerable

uation of ensation ble and

ways. vered or

ystems,

mount of struction adastral ll efforts n should scaping

s should

The whealthmanag All thereinsta The comunicQuarri Compnegatimeasucontrathe bil Enviromonitoalso rewith su The Pbe cameets

waste and h and safetyged accordin

e work sites ated to its in

ontractor wiipalities andies and borr

liance to thve impacts

ures are imact documenls-of-quantit

onmental Coring of implesponsible fupervision c

Project will harefully moni

s the MoE an

LoMod

azardous my procedureng to good in

(except permitial conditio

ll prepare a d submit to Mow pits.

e environmeof the Projeplemented a

nts of the Prties.

onsultants lementation for supervisi

consultants a

ave overall bitored and and ADB requ


material handes and othenternational

manently ocns (relief, to

spoil and wMDF for app

ental managect to acceptand negativroject with a

of Construof EMP andion of constand hiring of

beneficial imadequately uirements an


dling, dust aer common construction

ccupied by thpsoil, vegeta

waste disposproval. Fillin

gement plantable levels. ve impacts aa separate li

ction Suped ensure comtruction workf external/ind

mpact as wemitigated. T

nd submitted


and emissioconstructio

n practices.

he road andation cover).

sal plan in cng materials

n during varTo ensure

avoided, theine item on

ervision Conmpliance. Enks and comdependent m

ll as some mTherefore, thd to MoE to o


on control, ton related a

supporting .

consultation will be prov

rious phasethat these pe EMP will environmen

nsultants anvironmentapliance to E

monitoring co

minor negatihe completioobtain EIP.


raffic managactivities sho

facilities) sh

with MoE avided from l

es will minimplans and mbe included

ntal manage

re responsl Division of

EMP in coordonsultants.

ive impacts on of this IE

rvision ) Road

177

gement, ould be

hould be

nd local icensed

mize the itigation d in the ement in

ible for f MDF is dination

that will EE fully

Municipal Development Fund of Georgia

Initial Environmental Examination

Section-3: Phonichala - Rustavi

Volume-2 (ANEXES)

Engineering, Procurement, Construction Management and Supervision of the Modernization of Tbilisi-Rustavi Section of the Tbilisi-Red Bridge

(Azerbaijani Border) Road

Contract No: SUTIP/C/QCBS-3

Funded by

Asian Development Bank Loan: 2655-GEO

Prepared by: Foundation WEG Prepared for: DOHWA Ltd / TRANSPROJECT Ltd Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure

GEORGIA

2012

Korea Georgia Georgia

Table of Contents

Annex 1. Legal framework and administration structure of environmental management

in Georgia

Annex 2. Report of the Environmental Protection Agency on background pollution

Annex 3. Modeling the impact of vehicle exhaust on air quality

Annex 4. List of licensed borrow pits near the design area and copies of the licenses

Annex 5. Procedures to remove the plant species on the Red List of Georgia from the natural

environment and change the category of the forest fund ground

Annex 6. Waste management plan for construction camps

Annex 7. Protocols of Public Consultation Meetings

Annex 8. List of references

Annex 9. List of the EIA authors

LIST OF ACRONYMS

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIP Environmental Impact Permits EMP Environmental Management Plan HWL High Water Level IEE Initial Environmental Examination L/A Loan Agreement LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MAC Maximum Admissible Concentration MDF Municipal Development Fund MoCM Ministry of Culture and Monuments Protection MoE Ministry of Environment Protection NSFSVPP National Service for Food Safety, Veterinarian and Plant Protection ODA Official Development Assistance PAP Project Affected Persons RAP Resettlement Action Plan RD Roads Department RDMRDI Roads Department of Ministry of Regional Development & Infrastructure of Georgia RoW Right Of Way RPF Resettlement Policy Framework TEM Trans-European Motorway TOR Terms Of Reference USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics WB World Bank

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

ha hectare km kilometre km2 square kilometres litres/s litres per second m metre m2 square metre m3/s cubic metre per second m3 cubic metre mm milimetre s seconds

ANNEX 1

LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE IN GEORGIA 1.1 ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE Recent changes in the administrative structure, adopted by the Decrees No 132 and 133 of the Government of Georgia dated 16.03.2011, resulted in redistribution of responsibilities between the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources (MoEPNR) and the Ministry of Energy and are reflected in current titles of the mentioned ministries. The MoEPNR is renamed as the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MoE) and the Ministry of Energy is now titled as the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. Ministry of Environment Protection (MoE) and Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. The MoE is still considered as a leading ministry responsible developing the environmental policy of the government. The MoE consists of several functional departments, which are responsible for different aspects of environmental protection, and other supporting departments, like administrative department, Legal Department, PR Department etc. Functional departments and their responsibilities: Department of Permits - Carrying out Ecological Expertise and issuing

Environmental permits - Post EIA monitoring of compliance with the

conditions of Environmental Permit

Department of Environmental Policy and International Relations

- Development of the State Policy and State Environmental Programs

Department of Integrated Management of Environment

- Ambient air and water protection strategy - Consent on the Reports of “Inventory of

Stationary Sources of Emissions” and “Norms of Maximally Admissible Emissions”

- Consent on the Report on “Norms of Maximally Admissible Discharges”

- Consent on the technical regulations for Water Intake from the Surface Water Objects

- Waste Management - Hazardous Substance Management - Climate change control - Environmental Standards and Norms

Biodiversity Protection Department

- Biodiversity protection policy and programs

Legal Department - Development of Environmental Legislation Agency of Protected Areas - Protected areas development policy and

programs Environmental Agency - Hydrometeorology

- Pollution Monitoring - Geohazard monitoring - Monitoring of geo-ecological conditions of river

basins, water reservoirs, Black Sea territorial waters, continental

The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources has at present overall responsibility for managing natural resources and radiation safety. The Department of Natural Resources is managing following environmental issues:

- Issuance of licenses on exploration of natural resources. This includes also licenses for quarries and borrow pits supplying the road projects with the inert construction materials

Nuclear and Radiation Safety Department is responsible for - Development of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Policy - Radiation Safety Control

Environmental Inspection of the MoENR is responsible for: - Inspection of compliance with the natural resource use regulations - Inspection of compliance with the conditions of Environmental Impact Permit

In relation with the road projects, first of all it should be mentioned that Ministry of Environmental Protection is still in charge of issuing Environmental Impact Permits. At the same time, as it could be seen from the above schemes, both agencies – MoE and MoENR are sharing responsibilities for the post EIA monitoring, although the efficient monitoring system still needs to be developed. MoENR is responsible for issuing licenses for quarries and borrow pits. The Ministry of Environmental protection defines and evaluates real and possible risk of impact on natural environment during implementation of different types of activities. Accordingly the Ministry has been assigned as responsible body for making decision on granting permission to the proponent on implementation of projects, which require Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Granting procedures slightly differ for different type of projects. For the projects, which do not require Construction Permit, the Environmental permit is being issued by the Moe on the ground of State Ecological Examination. State Ecological Examination is carried out by Moe upon official submission of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) prepared by project developers. For projects requiring Construction Permit, no special permit is issued by MoE (according to “One window principle”, only one permit shall be issued for each activity). The Construction Permit is issued by the Ministry of Economic Development of Georgia, but the issuance of the Permit is subject to the consent of the MoE in a form of Conclusion of Ecological Expertise, as well as the Ministry of Culture (Center of Archaeological Studies, Department of Monuments protection). Consent of the MoE in such cases should be issued according to the same

procedures (EIA, public consultations; SEE etc.) as for issuing Environmental Permit. The Ministry of Economic Development as an administrative body issuing a permit ensures the involvement of the MoE as a different administrative body in the administrative proceedings initiated for the purpose of permit issuance, in accordance with Georgia’s Law on Licenses and Permits. project screening (definition of the project category and necessity for preparation of EIA) and scoping (definition of set of environmental issues and Terms of Reference) is carried out by the project implementing agency and its consultants (in this case RDMRDI and its consultants). Scoping and screening do not represent mandatory procedures according to Georgian legislature although review of scoping/screening outcomes and agreement of the Ministry of Environment Protection is considered a desired practice. As a rule, EIA permitting conditions contains requirement for informing MoE regarding fulfillment of the EIA permit conditions. This basically means giving information regarding implementation of Environmental Management and Monitoring Plans. Ministry of Economic and Sustainable Development. The projects related to construction or reconstruction of the highways of international significance are classified as the projects of Special Importance. MoESD is responsible for carrying out the review of technical documentation (including conclusion of an independent experts) and issuing Permits on Construction for such projects, as well as for supervision over constructing activities and for arranging Acceptance Commission after completion of construction. State supervision of construction and compliance monitoring is provided by the Main Architecture and Construction Inspection (MACI), which is operating under the Ministry of Economic Development of Georgia MoESD is issuing licenses for operations of quarries, needed for highway construction activities. The Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia (RDMRDI). RDMRDI is responsible for elaboration of policy and strategic plans related to developing motor roads, management of road and traffic related issues and construction, rehabilitation, reconstruction and maintenance of the roads of public use of international and national significance, utilizing funds from the state budget, lawns, grants and other financial sources. RDMRDI Responsibilities and Capacity Analysis Within the frames of the programs and projects, where the RDMRDI is appointed by the Government as implementing agency, the RDMRDI is responsible for the procurement of design and EIA studies, as well as works on construction and rehabilitation of roads of international and national significance, and is responsible for ensuring compliance with the Georgian legislation and environmental and social requirements of the relevant donor organizations. Control of implementation of the EMP is direct responsibility of the RDMRDI. The RDMRDI should have adequate capacity to ensure due consideration of environmental and social concerns at the stages of strategic planning, project development, design and environmental studies and construction or reconstruction activities.

The RDMRDI is supposed to review the EIAs and EMPs related to the RDMRDI projects and perform monitoring of compliance of the contractor’s performance with the approved EMPs, EIAs, environmental standards and other environmental commitments of the contractor. Internal resource of the RDMRDI is estimated to be sufficient for execution of project administration and overall environmental management. For the environmental monitoring of concrete projects, including the Zestafoni-Samtredia Highway project, RDMRDI shall procure technical and environmental supervision services. Other Responsible Governmental Institutions: The Ministry of Culture and Protection of Monuments. The ministry is responsible on supervision of the construction activities in order to protect archaeological heritage. In case if construction is to be carried out in a historic sites or zones of cultural heritage, consent of the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport is also required for issuing construction permit. The “National Service for the Foodstuffs Safety, Veterinary and Plant Protection” of the Ministry of the Agriculture (NSFSVPP). NSFSVPP is responsible for implementation of complex sanitary protection measures in case of identification of burial sites during earthworks. Information about suspicious burial sites should be delivered to the “National Service for the Foodstuffs Safety, Veterinary and Plant Protection” of the Ministry of the Agriculture by the Constructing Contactor (field environmental officer) and RDMRDI field officer. [Note: Governmental institutions responsible for technical supervision and compliance with the design documentation and construction standards are described in Design Documentation and are not subject for EIA or EMPs] 1.2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 1.2.1 Framework Legislation The basic legal document is “The Constitution of Georgia”, which was adopted in 1995. While the Constitution of Georgia does not directly address environmental matters, it does lay down the legal framework that guarantees environmental protection and public access to information with regard to environmental conditions. Article 37, Part 3 states that “any person has the right to live in a healthy environment, use the natural and cultural environment. Any person is obliged to take care of the natural and cultural environment.” Article 37, Part 5 states that “an individual has the right to obtain full, unbiased and timely information regarding his working and living environment.” Article 41, Part 1 states that “a citizen of Georgia is entitled to access information on such citizen as well as official documents available in State Institutions provided it does not contain confidential information of state, professional or commercial importance, in accordance with the applicable legal rules. Legislative execution of constitutional requirements in the sphere of environmental protection is implemented through framework Georgian “Law on Environmental Protection” (1996, as amended) and the set of specific laws developed on its basis. The framework law regulates the legal relationship between the bodies of the state authority and the physical persons or legal entities (without distinction-legal form) in the scope of environmental protection and in the use of

nature on all Georgia’s territory including its territorial waters, airspace, continental shelf and special economic zone. The law deals with education and scientific research in the scope of environment, environmental management aspects, economic levers, licensing, standards, EIA and related issues. Considers different aspects on protection of ecosystems, protected areas, issues of global and regional management, protection of ozone layer, biodiversity, protection of Black Sea and international cooperation aspects. In particular, the law addresses broad spectrum of issues, like environmental management, environmental education and awareness building, licenses and permits, fines and enforcement, environmental impact assessment, which should be further regulated by specific laws. According to the requirements set forth in the framework law, numerous laws and normative–legal documents were adopted to regulate specific environmental issues in Georgia. Further below the environmental regulations most relevant to the project – and first of all, to the permitting process - are described. 1.2.2 Legislation Related to Environmental Permitting At present, the environmental permitting procedure in Georgia is set out in three laws: The project proponent, in implementing projects, will comply with (i) The Law on Licenses and Permits (2005); (ii) The Law on Environmental Impact Permits (EIP), and (iii) The Law on Ecological Examination (EE) 2008. In more details the EIA process and required content of the EIA document is described in the Regulation on EIA issued by the MoE dated March 16, 2009. The Law on Licenses and Permits was adopted by Parliament of Georgia, on June 24, 2005. The Law regulates legally organized activities posing certain threats to human life and health, and addresses specific state or public interests, including usage of state resources. It also regulates activities requiring licenses or permits, determines types of licenses and permits, and defines the procedures for issuing, revising and canceling of licenses and permits (Article 1, Paragraph 1). The Laws on Environmental Impact Permit and on Ecological Examination have been published on 14.12.2007 and entered in force on 01.01.2008. These new laws integrate all the amendments introduced in legislation of Georgia during recent years. The Law of Georgia on Environmental Impact Permit. The Law of Georgia on Environmental Impact Permit determines the complete list of the activities and projects subject to the ecological examination (clause 4 p.1) and the legal basis for public participation in the process of environmental assessment, ecological examination and decision making on issuance of an environmental impact permit. Under the “activities” subject to the ecological examination the law considers construction of new or upgrading of existing facilities imposing change of technology and operational conditions for the projects and activities included into the list. The routine maintenance works in relation with the same facilities do not require ecological examination and permit. In case if the activity included into the list given in clause 4 p.1 at the same time requires Construction Permit, the administrative body responsible for issuance of the Construction Permit ensures involvement of MoE, as a separate administrative body, in the administrative procedures initiated for the purpose of issuing Construction Permit, as it is envisaged by the Law on Licenses and Permits. In such cases the MoE is issuing the Conclusion on the Ecological Examination of the project based on the documentation provided to MoE by the

administrative body issuing the Permit. The Conclusion on the Ecological Examination is adopted by the administrative (executive) legal act of the MoE and compliance with the conditions of the Conclusion is obligatory for the project proponent. The conditions of the Conclusion on Ecological Examination is a part of conditions of the Construction Permit. In case if the activity included into the list given in clause 4 p.1 does not require Construction Permit, based on the Conclusion on the Ecological Examination the MoE will issue the Environmental Impact Permit, supported by the administrative (executive) legal act issued by the minister. The ecological examination is carried out in accordance with the law of Georgia on Ecological Examination and the conditions set forth by the Conclusion present the Conditions of the Permit. The aforementioned laws do not provide details of screening procedure and do not define responsibilities of parties. According to the practice, the screening of project proposals and the preliminary assessment of their environmental impact and proposed mitigation measures (scoping) are being carried out by the project proponent in consultation with the MoE. Public Consultation Procedures. The 6th clause of the law of Georgia on the Environmental Impact Permit provides detailed requirements and procedures for conducting public consultations and established timeframes for information disclosure and discussion, namely: According to article 6 , developer is obliged to carry out public discussion of the EIA before its submission to an administrative body responsible for issuing a permit (in case of activity requiring construction permit before initiating stage 2 procedure for construction permit issuance). A developer is obliged to disclose (publish) the draft EIA document and publish information regarding details fo the planned public discussion. Information is subject to publication in the central periodical as well as in the printing organ existing within the administrative territory of the same rayon (if such exists) where an activity is planned. Information (advertisement) shall contain the following information:

x The objectives, title and location of the planned activity; x The location where interested individuals may obtain the activity related documents

(including the EIA report); x Deadline for the submission of their opinions; x The place and time of public discussion.

A developer is entitled:

x To submit a hard copy and an electronic version of the Environmental Impact Assessment to administrative body issuing a permit within a week from the date of the publication;

x To receive and consider within 50 days from the date of publication from citizens written comments and suggestions;

x Hold a public discussion on a planned activity not earlier than 50days and not later than 60 days from the publication of an advertisement;

x To ensure invitation to public discussion of the representatives of respective local administration and governmental agencies representatives; the Ministry and the Ministry of Economic and Sustainable Development and other interested administrative bodies.

Discussion shall be held publicly and any citizen has a right to attend it. Public discussion shall be held in the administrative center of the rayon where an activity is planned. According to the article 7 of the law, during 5 days after conducting the public disclosure meeting, the minutes of the meeting should be prepared to reflect all the questions and comments raised and explanations, provided by the project proponents in response. Appropriate corrections should be incorporated into the main text of the EIA, if required. If the comments and proposals of stakeholders are not accepted a letter of explanation should be sent to the authors. The minutes of the meeting, as well as response letters, explanations and corrections should be submitted to the MoE or the administrative body responsible for issuing the Permit as supplementary materials to the EIA. The mentioned documents should be considered as an essential part of the EIA. Procedure of Official Submission of EIA to MoE Article 8 of the Law specifies the documents to submit to receive a permit:

(1) An operator, in order to receive a permit, shall submit a written statement to the Ministry. A statement to receive a permit is submitted, considered and processed under the rule established by the ‘Law of Georgia on Licenses and Permits’. (2) An operator is obliged, in addition to the information specified by the ‘Law of Georgia on Licenses and Permits’, to submit the following documents:

(a) An EIA report drawn up under the standards specified by the legislation of Georgia (in 5 hard copies and 1 soft copy) (b) A situation plan of the planned activity (with the indication of distances) (c) Volume and types of the expected emissions (a technical report of inventory of the stationery sources of pollution and emitted/discharged harmful substances and project of maximum permissible concentrations of emitted/discharged harmful substances (in 4 copies)) (d) A brief description of the activity (as a technical summary) (e) A statement about the confidential part of the submitted statement.

(3) An operator is obliged to submit a full diagram of the technological cycle to the permit issuing body even if the given activity contains a commercial and/or state secret. This part of the statement, according to sub-clause ‘e’ of clause 2 of the given Article should be submitted separately by the operator.

Issuance of the Permit on Environmental Impact The article 9 of the law describes the procedures of issuing the Environmental Impact Permit. The same issue is addressed in the laws of Georgia on “Licenses and Permits” (2005) and “on Ecological Examination’ (2008).

1. According to the law on “Licenses and Permits,” the MoE takes decision on issuing Permit within the 20 days after submission of request on permit by the project proponent. 2. MoE , in accordance with the law on Ecological Examination, ensures expertise of the submitted documentation and issuance of Conclusion on Ecological Examination. The Permit (Environmental Permit, or Construction Permit when the latest is required) is issued only in case of the positive conclusion of the Ecological Examination.

Regulation on EIA as of March 16, 2009. The requirements related to EIA studies and the EIA report are set forth in the Regulation on EIA issued by MoE in March 2009. The content of the EIA document is specified in the clause 5 of the Regulation as follows: Article 5. Content of the environmental impact assessment The Environmental impact assessment report should include the following information:

(a) Analysis of the existing state of the environment; (b) Identifying the sources, kinds and objects of impact caused by the activity; (c) Forecast of the changes of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the

environment; (d) Determining the probability of emergency situations due to the activity and evaluating the

expected results; (e) Evaluation of the environmental, social and economic results of the planned activity; (f) Specifying the reduction measures for the negative impact on the environment and

human health and specifying the compensation measures as necessary; (g) Identifying the residual (cumulative) impact and measures for its control and monitoring; (h) Undertaking environmental and economic evaluation of the projects; (i) Analysis of the alternative variants of the project implementation, selection and forming

new variants; (j) Identifying the ways and means to restore the initial environmental condition in case of

terminating entrepreneurship or other activity; (k) Informing the society and studying the public opinion; (l) Plan for the post-project situational analysis; (m) Identifying the kinds and quantities of the expected emissions; (n) Forecast of the expected environmental state gained through the environmental impact

factors; Decree also requires development of the Monitoring Plan during the implementation of the project and at the end of the activity.

Disclosure and Environmental Impact Permit Procedure 1. Announcement in the national and local

newspaper about proposed activities; 2. Copy of Draft EIA report submitted to the MoE ,

copy of Draft EIA report sent to website, NGOs& offices of local authorities.

of

ficia

l pro

cedu

re &

act

iviti

es

date:

Within 50 days following announcement receive

comments and recommendations

Following an announcement conduct public

consultation within no earlier than 50 and no later than 60 days.

date:

Within 5 days Prepare minutes of the

public consultation meeting

Public comments and recommendations to be incorporated into the EIA report; if there are any

objections, written grounded response should be sent to the author of the comments.

All comments and concerns to be reflected in the final EIA report

date: next 15 days EIA report is finalized and submitted to MoE

through MoESD together with all other Environmental Impact Permit application

documents

date:

Environmental Impact Permit issued within 20 days

after registration of the incoming application by the MoE

date:

1.2.3 Other Environmental Laws The Law on Environmental Inspectorate has been adopted in 04.05.2010. This Law has been abolished in 2011, however its provisions are in force until the relevant authorized bodies will issue new regulations. This Law authorized Environmental Inspectorate to conduct post EIA monitoring on compliance with the Conditions of Environmental Permit and conditions of licenses for exploration of natural resources. For the moment of issuing of this law, the Environmental Inspectorate was under the MoE. Currently, as we have described in p. 2.1, the Environmental Inspectorate has been moved to the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. Department of Permits of MoE and Environmental Inspectorate of MoENR are sharing responsibilities for the post EIA monitoring. Waste Management. The following acts of the Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Protection of Georgia define the waste management rules to be met during the road rehabilitation projects: The act on “Approval of the rules of collection, storage and neutralization of the wastes of preventive treatment establishments” 16 August of 2001, 300 (“Georgian Legislative Messenger” N90 24/08/2001); The act on “Approval of arrangement of polygon/grounds for disposal of solid household wastes and adoption of sanitary rules and norms” 24 February, #36 (Georgian Legislative Messenger #17, 07.03.03); The “Georgian Law on Ambient Air Protection” was put into effect from 1 January 2000.

The scope of the “Georgian law on Ambient Air Protection” is to protect ambient air on the whole territory of Georgia from harmful human impact. This law does not govern the field of air protection in work places. Main competences of governmental authorities in the field of ambient air protection (a) Development of environmental monitoring (observation) system; (b) Development and implementation of common policies and strategies; and (c) Development of integrated ambient air pollution control. Types of harmful human impact include:

x introduction of pollutants into the ambient air; x radioactive impact on ambient air; x ambient air pollution with micro-organisms and microbial toxins; x physical impact of noise, vibration, electromagnetic field etc on ambient air.

Types of ambient air pollution are specified:

x emission of pollutants into the ambient air from stationary pollution source; x emission of pollutants into the ambient air from mobile sources of pollution; x emission of pollutants into the ambient air from non-point sources of pollution; x emission of pollutants into the ambient air from small-scale sources of pollution.

According to the Article 291, the inventory on emissions of air pollutants from stationary pollution sources is obligatory for physical and legal entities. The special inventory report is to be prepared for 5 years for each source of the atmospheric air pollution and each type of a harmful substance. At preparing the EIA project, a full inventory on emissions (in case of existence) is to be carried out and maximum permissible concentrations or temporarily agreed permissible concentrations of the emitted harmful substances for stationary pollution sites are to be set. Maximum permissible concentration is an amount of permitted emissions of air pollutants from stationary pollution sources. Temporarily agreed permission concentrations can be approved for five years (maximum) without prolongation. The Maximum permissible concentration of the emitted harmful substances for stationary pollution sites is approved for 5 years for each source of the atmospheric air pollution and each type of a harmful substance. Registration of emissions from stationary pollution sources comprises:

x self-monitoring of emissions; x state emission registration system.

Self-monitoring of emission of pollutants from stationary pollution sources means that economical actor (operator) shall conduct adequate self-monitoring of pollutant emissions from stationary pollution sources. It includes:

x emission measurements (assessment) x registration of emissions x reporting of emissions

State emission registration system is a system of compilation, processing and analysis of emission reporting documentation. The Ministry of Environment Protection and Natural Resources of Georgia conducts state registration of emissions. The Law of Minerals of 1996 provides provisions for the mineral resource exploration and management and establishes the requirement to obtain a license according to the procedures

established under this law. The Law on Licensing and Permits (June 25, 2005) establishes the most recent regulations for licensing. According to the current legislation all quarries and borrow pits require to obtain a license. The Wildlife Law of 1996 mandates the MoE to regulate wildlife use and protection on the whole territory of the country. The law empowers the MoE to issue hunting permits and licenses, declare hunting areas, control poaching etc. Potential poaching by the workers should be controlled also during construction works, especially in such a sensitive ecological areas as Borjomi-Bakuriani.

Forestry Code of Georgia (1999, including effective amendments) The Forestry Code of Georgia regulates the legal relations connected to looking after, protection, restoration and application of the forest fund and its resources. The aims of the Forestry Code of Georgia are as follows: Looking after, protection and rehabilitation of forests aiming at conserving and improving their climatic, water-regulating, protective, cultural, health, medicinal and other mineral wealth, conservation and protection of original natural and cultural environment and its individual components, including the vegetation cover and fauna, bio-diversity, landscape, cultural and natural monuments in the forests, rare and endangered plant species and others and regulation of their interaction in the benefit of the future generation. Article 38 of the Forestry Code establishes the modes of protection of the state forest fund:

(1) Aiming at protecting the present state of the state economic forest fund and its biodiversity, originality of intact forests and relict, endemic and other valuable plant species, the general or special mode of protection of the state economic forest fund has been introduced by considering the priority functionality, historical, cultural and other values of the forest (2) The mode of protection of the protected territories of Georgia is defined under the Georgian Law ‘On the system of protected territories’.

Article 41 defines the modes of protection to be used for different categories of the state economic forest funds:

(1) The mode of special protection applies to the resort and green zones of the state economic forest fund, as well as flood-plain forests and forest sub-alpine zone. (2) The mode of general protection applies to the soil conservation and water-regulation forests under the rule provided by Article 42 of the present Code.

Article 39 specifies the special limitations to certain types of activity defined by the special mode of protection:

(1) The following activities are prohibited in the state economic forests and lands where a special mode of protection is applied:

(a) Cutting of a principal use; (b) Activities of the first and second categories as defined by the Law of Georgia ‘On environmental permits’, except the programs for rehabilitation of the protected areas and founding the hunting firms (02.03.2001 749).

Law of Georgia ‘On the system of the protected areas’ (1996) The Law defines the categories of ‘protected areas’ and specifies the frames of activities admissible in the given areas. The permitted actions are defined by considering the designation of the areas and in accordance with the management plans and provisions of the international

conventions and agreements to which Georgia is a party. As a general requirement, the following activities are prohibited in the protected areas:

(a) Disturbance or any other changes of the natural ecosystems (b) Demolition (destroy), arrest, disturbance, damage (invalidation) of any natural resource with the purpose of its exploitation or any other purpose (c) Damage of the natural ecosystems or species by reason of the environmental pollution (d) Bringing and breeding foreign or exotic species of living organisms (e) Bringing explosives or toxic materials to the area.

According to the above-mentioned Management Plan, all kinds of economic and entrepreneurship activities are admissible in the support zone provided they do not hamper the functioning of the protected areas. Law of Georgia ‘On the Red List and Red Book’ (2003) The Law regulates the legal relations in the field of developing the Red List and Red Book, protecting and using the endangered species, except the legal issues of the international trade with endangered wild animals and wild plants, which within the limits of the jurisdiction of Georgia are regulated by virtue of the Convention ‘On the international trade with the endangered species of wild fauna and flora’ concluded on March 3 of 1973 in the city of Washington. According to Article 10 of the Law, any activity, including hunting, fishing, extraction, cutting down and hay-mowing, except particular cases envisaged by the present Law, Law of Georgia ‘On animal life’ and legislation of Georgia, which may result in the reduction in number of the endangered species, deterioration of the breeding area or living conditions, is prohibited. Possible harmful effect of anthropogenization on the endangered species should be taken into account when issuing the permit on environmental impact during the ecological expertise. The Red List of Georgia was approved by the Presidential Decree No. 303 ‘On approving the Red List of Georgia’ (May 2, 2006) The water supply and wastewater system rehabilitation project is to be accomplished within the resort zone and accordingly, the Law of Georgia ‘On Tourism and resort’ and Law of Georgia ‘On the zones of sanitary protection of resorts and resort areas’ should be considered. Decree No. 538; There is a chance that the project activity may cause harm to the environment, which will be impossible to mitigate even through planning and realizing the preventive measures. The rules to estimate and compensate for the environmental damage have been developed for such cases under the Decree No. 538 ‘On approving the methods to estimate the environmental damage’ of the Minister of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Georgia adopted on July 5, 2006. Below we site the clauses, which may be useful to estimate the damage within the limits of the project. Article 2. The rule to estimate the damage caused by the harmful anthropogenic action on the atmospheric air Article 3. The rule to estimate the environmental damage caused by the soil pollution Article 4. The rule to estimate the environmental damage caused by the soil degradation Article 5. The rule to estimate the environmental damage caused by illegal action with forest resources

Article 6. The rule to estimate the environmental damage caused by damaging the green plantations in the capital of Georgia, other cities and towns, regional centers and settlements Article 7. The rule to estimate the damage caused by damaging the fish reserve and other biological forms Article 8. The rule to estimate the damage caused by illegal acquisition of the animal life objects Article 9. The rule to estimate the environmental damage during the fossil exploitation Article 10. The rule to estimate the environmental damage caused by the pollution of water resources. The Law of Georgia on Soil Protection (1994. Amended in 1997, 2002) The aim of the Law is to protect the soil from the contamination and sets the limits for the hazardous substances concentration in it. The regulates the usage of fertile soils for non agricultural purposes and strictly prohibits to undertake any kind of activity without removal of the fertile soil layer and makes compulsory to reinstate sites after open mining. It regulates uncontrolled pasturing of animals and protects forest as a mean to maintain the soil in a favourable condition. Prohibits and regulates any kind of activity related to the storage of chemicals and hazardous substances could pollute or damage the soil properties. The Law of Georgia on Water 1998 as amended This Act governs the legal relations: Between state authorities and natural and legal persons (regardless of the form of ownership and the legal-organizational status) in the sphere of water protection, study and use; In the sphere of water protection, restoration and use on the land, in the continental shelf, territorial waters and in the special economic zone; In the sphere of commercial water production and international trade in water; Under the current law requirements no water discharge or abstraction license is required in case of discharge of the water the developer by Environmental Impact Permit might be required to submit Maximum Permissible Discharge Documents culculating the volumes of the discharge and impact on environment. The ‘Law of Georgia on Cultural Heritage’ was approved in May of 2007. Article 14 of the Law specifies the requirements for ‘large-scale’ construction works. According to this Article, a decision on career treatment and ore extraction on the whole territory of Georgia, as well as on construction of an object of a special importance as it may be defined under the legislation of Georgia, is made by a body designated by the legislation of Georgia based on the positive decision of the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia. The basis for the conclusion is the archeological research of the proper territory to be carried out by the entity wishing to accomplish the ground works. The entity wishing to do the ground works is obliged submit the Ministry the documentation about the archeological research of the territory in question. The preliminary research should include field-research and laboratory works. In case of identifying an archeological object on the territory to study, the conclusion of the archeological research should contain the following information: (a) a thorough field study of the archeological layers and objects identified on the study territory by using modern methodologies, (b) recommendations about the problem of conservation of the identified objects and planning of the building activity on the design territory, on the basis of the archeological research.

Georgian Law on Regulation and Engineering Protection of Coasts of Sea, Water Reservoirs and Rivers of Georgia (27.12.2006, No. 4131) Article 9. Rules regulating the economic activity within the coast protection zone

(1) The body issuing a building permit within the zone of coast engineering protection is obliged to engage the Ministry in the permit issuing process as a concerned administrative body and send it proper documentation for the obligatory conclusion. (2) The construction project of buildings and premises within the zone of coast engineering protection should envisage the compensation amounts for the expected coastal damage. (3) Extraction of inert material within the zones of strict supervision of sea, water reservoir or river is prohibited, unless this is done for the purposes of coast-formation or control of streams.

1.2.4 International Commitments International cooperation is a dominant feature and driving force for environmental reforms in Georgia. Some of the International Treaties and Conventions Ratified or Signed by Georgia are provided in the list below. Short List of the Ratified or Signed Conventions N Title Year of

ratification1 Ramsar Convention on Wetlands 19962 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) 19943 Kyoto Protocol 19994 Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movement of

Hazardous Waste and Their Disposal1999

5 Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention)

1999

6 United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) 19997 Convention on Biological Diversity 19948 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild

Fauna and Flora (CITES) 1996

9 The Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer 199510 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer 199511 Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollutants 199912 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants 200613 Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural

habitats 2008

14 Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade

2006

Aarhus Convention June, 1998

The Aarhus Convention establishes a number of rights of the public (individuals and their associations) with regard to the environment. The Parties to the Convention are required to make the necessary provisions so that public authorities (at national, regional or local level) will contribute to these rights to become effective. The Convention provides for:

x the right of everyone to receive environmental information that is held by public authorities ("access to environmental information"). This can include information on the state of the environment, but also on policies or measures taken, or on the state of human health and safety where this can be affected by the state of the environment. Applicants are entitled to obtain this information within one month of the request and without having to say why they require it. In addition, public authorities are obliged, under the Convention, to actively disseminate environmental information in their possession;

x the right to participate in environmental decision-making. Arrangements are to be made by public authorities to enable the public affected and environmental non-governmental organisations to comment on, for example, proposals for projects affecting the environment, or plans and programmes relating to the environment, these comments to be taken into due account in decision-making, and information to be provided on the final decisions and the reasons for it ("public participation in environmental decision-making");

x the right to review procedures to challenge public decisions that have been made without respecting the two aforementioned rights or environmental law in general ("access to justice").

Setting the goal to preserve its biological diversity and realising the importance of international cooperation, Georgia signed the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1994, thus accepting responsibility to safeguard the nation’s rich diversity and of plant, animal, and microbial life to begin using biological resources in sustainable way, and to ensure equitable sharing of benefits from biodiversity The Convention on Biological Diversity is the first global agreement, which, along with biodiversity conservation, necessitates the sustainable use of biological resources Georgia has been recognised as holding an important reservoir of biodiversity and is very important in the global context – according to the surveys and assessments conducted at an international level Georgia, as a part of the Caucasus, is recognized as:

. 1. One out of 25 biologically richest and endangered land ecosystems (Conservation International);

2. One out of 200 vulnerable ecoregions (WWF); 3. One out of 221 endemic bird habitats (Bird Life International); 4. One of the World Agrobiodiversity Centres. Georgia has implemented a number of measures on fulfilment of the guidelines defined by the International environmental treaties which is party to, in particular:

� The country acceded the most important international treaties on biodiversity, such as

Convention on Biological Diversity, Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, Especially as Waterfowl Habitat, Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (the Bonn Convention) and its Agreements;

� A number of national legislative acts has been adopted in the field of conservation and

sustainable use of biodiversity since 1996; � Georgia conducted biodiversity assessment studies (National Biodiversity Assessment

Program, UNEP, 1996); � Strategy and Action Plan on conservation of Georgia’s biological diversity was

elaborated and approved (2005);

� With the financial support of the German Government and the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Protected Areas - the Borjomi-Kharagauli and the Kolkheti National Parks were established; with the support of the German Government, new protected areas

are planned to be established on the Javakheti Plateau in southern Georgia; � With the support of the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Project on Development

of Protected Areas in Georgia is being implemented. The aim of the project is to elaborate management plans for three protected areas in eastern Georgia (Lagodekhi, Vashlovani and Tusheti), to develop infrastructure necessary for their effective management and to strengthen the State Department for Protected Areas in terms of improving skills for protected areas management;

� With the financial support of the World Bank, the forestry development project is under implementation in Georgia to promote conservation and sustainable use of Georgian forests.

Though the development of protected areas is the major strategy for protection of biodiversity in Georgia, some other priority directions in this field have emerged: � conservation – preservation of rare and endangered species in bio-reserves; � creation of genetic fund of wild nature; � sustainable use of renewable natural resources; � reproduction – breeding of rare and endangered species and their introduction in the

nature.

The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (also known as CMS or Bonn Convention) aims to conserve terrestrial, marine and avian migratory species throughout their range. It has been signed in 1979 in Bonn (Germany.) Georgia ratified the treaty in 2000 together with its three agreements: � Agreement on “Protection of Populations of European Bats” (EUROBATS); � Agreement on “Conservation of Cetaceans of the Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea and Contiguous Atlantic Area “ (ACCOBAMS ); � Agreement on “ Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds” (AEWA). Taking into account, that the Agreements have been initially designed as an instrument for facilitating the implementation of the CMS, the compliance with and enforcement of CMS in Georgia is mostly reflected in implementation of the Agreements. 1.2.5 Environmental Standards and Norms Environmental Quality Regulations and Standards Within the context of the water supply and water drainage project, the environmental quality standards and norms are of primary importance. They define the quality of drinking water, admissible levels of surface waters pollution and measures of their protection including the zones of sanitary protection. The mentioned standards are considered under a separate clause (Clause 2.1.4). The maximum admissible levels of atmospheric air pollution and noise are also of a certain importance to the stage of building. Noise and atmospheric air pollution pose be a certain problem during the building operations (mainly, as the building techniques emissions and welding emissions) and exploitation of the rehabilitated objects (e.g. in case of operation of diesel-generators).

In accordance with the ‘Law on public health’, the environmental qualitative norms are approved by Decrees of the Minister of Labor, Health and Social Security of Georgia (Decrees Nos. 297/N of 16.08.2001, including the changes made to it by further decrees of the Ministry Nos. 38/N of 02.24.2003, 251/N of 09.15.1006, 351/N of 12.17.2007). Ambient Air Quality Norms. The provisions for the protection of ambient air against contamination and the values of Maximum Admissible Concentrations of the harmful substances in the ambient air in the vicinity of the settlements is provided in the Environmental Quality Norms approved by the Order #297N (16.08.2001) of the Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Protection (as amended by the Order No 38/n of the same Ministry of 24.02.2003). The quality of atmospheric air (pollution with hazardous matter) is also defined by the order of the Minister of Environment Protection and Natural Resources (#89, 23 October 2001) on approval of the rule for calculation of index of pollution of atmospheric air with hazardous pollution. Table 1.1 Maximum Admissible Concentration of Pollutants (MAC) in Ambient Air mg/m3

N

Substance

N according to CAS

Formula

MAC (mg/m3) Class of harmfulness

Maximum

fugitive Average

Daily 1 2 3 4 5 6 8

6 Nitrogen (IV) Dioxide

10102-44-0 NO2 0.2 0.04 2

111 Sulfur Dioxide

9/5/7446 SO2 0.5 0.05 3

359 Carbone Oxide 630-08-0 CO 5 3 4 360 Soot (Carbone

black)

1333-86-4 C 0.15 0.05 3

Noise Standards. The Georgian standards for noise control are approved by the Decree of the Minister for Health, Labour and Social Affairs (297n of August 16, 2001) on the ‘Approval of Environmental Quality Standards’, which specify the tolerable and maximum admissible levels of noise for different zones. Table 1.2. Georgian Noise Quality Standards in Residential Areas Time Indicative Level La dBA Maximum Admissible Level La max dBA7am – 11 pm 55 7011pm – 7am 45 60

ANNEX 2

REPORT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ON MEASUREMENTS OF BASELINE CONTAMINATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA

Analysis Report Considerations and interpretations of Test Report No. _20(2011)

National Environmental Agency

Department of Environment Pollution Monitoring

Laboratory of Atmospheric Air, Water and Soil Analyses

Floor 8, David Agmashenebeli Avenue 150, Tbilisi 0112, Georgia

Analysis Report No. ...20...

Numbers of registered samples: 423, 424, 429, 430, 431

Number of Protocol pages: 9

Client: Non-entrepreneurial Entity WORLD EXPERIENCE FOR GEORGIA

Client’s address: Apt. 3, Building 17, Block 7, Vazha-Pshavela Avenue, Tbilisi

Tel: (+99532) 599 16 22 21

Fax:

ID No.:

E-mail:

Etiquettes provided by the Client: # 1, # 2, # 3, # 4, # 5

Sample description and identification (matrix, form): Surface and ground water, atmospheric

air, soil

Used method/device: Ion-chromatographic, spectrophotometric, atomic-absorption, titrimetric,

membrane-filtration

Sample receiving date: CR: 12.12.2011.

Date of analysis: 12.12.2011 – 23.12.2011

Date of issue: 26.12.2011

Nos. 423, 424, 429, 431 ( # 4, # 5, # 1, # 3)

Surface water

# Description

Maximum Permissible

Concentration

Mtkvari Ortachala

Surface

water

at the entrance to

Rustavi

From the gully along the route

Mtkvari (in the

Patriarchate’s forest)

N 41040’31,6’’

EO 44050’10,0’’

N 41035’55,3’’

EO 44056’30,4’’

N 41036’17,0’’

EO 44056’15,7’’

N 41037’09,5’’

EO 44056’24,0’’

1 Turbulence, NTU 1.67 1.49 1.21 1.58

2 pH 6.5-8.5 8.211 8.123 8.141 8.603

3 Diluted oxygen, mg/l 4 – 6 8.15 8.07 8.02 8.45

4 Hydrocarbonates, mg/l 173.2 222.0 192.8 173.2

5 TDS, mg/l 257.0 778.0 1491.0 274.0

6 Total nitrogen, N, mg/l 2.772 2.804 7.858 2.479

7 Total phosphate, mg/l 0.266 0.387 0.859 0.135

8 Chlorides, mg/l 350 20.2 159.7 77.9 19.37

9 Oil products, mg/l 0.3 0.024 0.063 0.042 0.012

# 430 ( # 2) Ground water

No. Description Maximum Permissible

Concentration

Water from the territory of

the Patriarchate

Coordinates

N 41037’05,4’’

EO 44056’12,0’’

1 pH 8.403

2 TDS, mg/l 599.0

3 Sulphates, mg/l 250 791.6

4 Chlorides, mg/l 250 48.8

5 Hydrocarbonates, mg/l 185.4

6 Sodium, mg/l 200 68.5

7 Calcium, mg/l 140 149.2

8 Magnesium, mg/l 85 31.4

9 Total coliforms, in 250 ml Inadmissible None detected

Info

rmat

ion

abou

t the

con

cent

ratio

n of

pol

lutin

g su

bsta

nces

in th

e at

mos

pher

ic a

ir

Non

-ent

repr

eneu

rial

Ent

ity W

OR

LD E

XPE

RIE

NC

E FO

R G

EOR

GIA

Dat

e of

m

easu

rem

ent

ʋ

Plac

e of

m

easu

rem

ent

Site

co

ordi

nate

s t0

hum

idity

,%

C

once

ntra

tion,

mg/

m3

Dus

t C

O

NO

2 SO

2 12

.12.

11.

ʋ 1

Ort

acha

la

(0,0

km)

N 4

10 40’3

1,6’

’ EO

440 50

’10,

0’’

2.6

26

0.17

62.

36

0.11

3 <0

.1

ʋ

2

Poni

chal

a (9

,0km

)

N 4

10 37’5

8,7’

’ EO

440 55

’07,

7’’

3.0

32

0.09

81.

42

0.07

6 <0

.1

ʋ 3

R

usta

vi h

ighw

ay

(13,

5km

)

N 4

10 35’5

5,3’

’ EO

440 56

’30,

4’’

3.2

30

0.07

20.

98

0.04

6 <0

.1

ʋ 4

E

ntry

to R

usta

vi

(17,

7km

)

N 4

10 33’5

0,2’

’ EO

440 57

’52,

9’’

3.6

34

0.10

41.

66

0.08

2 <0

.1

M

axim

um

Perm

issib

le

Con

cent

ratio

n

0.5

5.0

0,2

0,5

Soil

anal

ysis

resu

lts

# D

escr

iptio

n

Ort

acha

la

(0,0

km)

Poni

chal

a (9

,0km

) R

usta

vi h

ighw

ay

(13,

5km

) E

ntry

to R

usta

vi

(17,

7km

)

N 4

10 30’3

1,6’

’ EO

440 50

’10,

0’’

N 4

10 37’5

8,7’

’

EO 4

40 55’0

7,7’

’

N 4

10 35’5

4,3’

’

EO 4

40 56’3

0,4’

’

N 4

10 33’5

0,2’

’

EO 4

40 57’5

2,3’

’

1 L

ead,

Pb,

mkg

/g

73.4

15

.4

42.3

3 18

.2

2 Z

inc,

Zn,

mkg

/g

187.

6 61

.9

91.6

65

.5

3 C

obal

t, C

o,m

kg/g

15

.71

12.7

6 12

.69

12.5

4 C

oppe

r, C

u,m

kg/g

15

3 81

.8

98.6

90

.9

5 N

icke

l, N

i, m

kg/g

29

.9

18.2

19

.7

22.7

28

Type of analysis: A - accredited, N - Non-accredited, C - Pre-international accreditation period, subcontractual - accreditation, subcontractual - non-accreditation; used method: IC-ion chromatograph, UV/VIS-spectrophotometer, atomic-absorptive. Note: The results of the analyses are disputable within 14 days of receiving the protocol. Analysis Report drafted by: Elina Bakradze,

Head of the

Laboratory of Atmospheric Air, Water and Soil Analyses

Protocol examined by: Gulchina Kuchava, Head of Division

Analysis Report approved by: Marine Arabidze, Head of Department

31

ANNEX3.

MODELLING OF TRAFFIC RELATED EMISSIONS

32

Ambient Air Pollution from the Intensity of Traffic within Rehabilitation of Tbilisi-Rustavi Connecting Highway

The hourly intensity of traffic within Tbilisi-Rustavi highway rehabilitation according to observation data in 2011 is characterized with the below parameters: cars - 507 units; minibuses - 201 units; autobuses - 21 units and trucks - 18 units; dispersions calculated from this data [1] are given in the form of a table in Appendix #1. According to 2016 estimates, intensity of traffic was assessed with the following parameters: cars - 724 units; minibuses - 286 units; autobuses - 30 units and trucks - 25 units; dispersions calculated from this data [1] are given in the form of a table in Appendix #2. Air quality modeling was completed on the basis of calculated dispersion data [2] for pollutant substances within 1000 m section (calculation step – 25 m). The analysis of the results shows that standards are not exceeded in control points (nearest populated areas – 7 points) and the graphical and table data of these results are given below. (Numbers imply maximum permissible concentration shares).

33

2011

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

nitr

ogen

dio

xide

(301

)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

34

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

nitr

ogen

oxi

de (3

04)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

35

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

soot

(328

)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

36

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

sulp

hur

diox

ide

(330

)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

37

Air

qua

lity

mod

elin

g fo

r ca

rbon

oxi

de (3

37)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

38

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

benz

opyr

ene

(703

)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

39

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

form

alde

hyde

(132

5)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

40

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

petr

ol fr

actio

n (2

704)

2

5

6

7

1

3

4

41

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

para

ffin

frac

tion

(273

2)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

42

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

nitr

ogen

dio

xide

(301

) an

d su

lphu

r di

oxid

e (3

30) t

otal

impa

ct (6

053)

2

5

6

7

1

3

4

43

2016

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

nitr

ogen

dio

xide

(301

)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

44

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

nitr

ogen

oxi

de (3

04)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

45

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

soot

(328

)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

46

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

sulp

hur

diox

ide

(330

)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

47

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

carb

on o

xide

(337

)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

48

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

benz

opyr

ene

(703

)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

49

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

form

alde

hyde

(132

5)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

50

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

petr

ol fr

actio

n (2

704)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

51

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

para

ffin

frac

tion

(273

2)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

52

A

ir q

ualit

y m

odel

ing

for

nitr

ogen

dio

xide

(301

) an

d su

lphu

r di

oxid

e (3

30) t

otal

impa

ct (6

053)

2 5

6

7

1

3

4

53

General Conclusion: Values of ambient air pollution caused by the existing and perspective intensity of motor traffic within Tbilisi-Rustavi connecting highway rehabilitation will not exceed the standards. Table data on concentration at control points in 2011-2016 are given in Appendix # 3 and Appendix # 4.

Bibliography

1. “Ɇɟɬɨɞɢɤɚ ɨɩɪɟɞɟɥɟɧɢɹ ɜɵɛɪɨɫɨɜ ɜɪɟɞɧɵɯ (ɡɚɝɪɹɡɧɹɸɳɢɯ) ɜɟɳɟɫɬɜ

ɜ ɚɬɦɨɫɮɟɪɧɵɣ ɜɨɡɞɭɯ ɨɬ ɚɜɬɨɬɪɚɧɫɩɨɪɬɧɵɯ ɩɨɬɨɤɨɜ,

ɞɜɢɠɭɳɢɯɫɹ ɩɨ ɚɜɬɨɦɚɝɢɫɬɪɚɥɹɦ”. ɪɚɡɪɚɛɨɬɚɧ ɇɂɂ ɨɯɪɚɧɵ ɚɬɦɨɫɮɟɪɧɨɝɨ ɜɨɡɞɭɯɚ

(ɇɂɂ Ⱥɬɦɨɫɮɟɪɚ) Ɏɟɞɟɪɚɥɶɧɨɣ ɫɥɭɠɛɵ ɩɨ ɷɤɨɥɨɝɢɱɟɫɤɨɦɭ, ɬɟɯɧɨɥɨɝɢɱɟɫɤɨɦɭ ɢ

ɚɬɨɦɧɨɦɭ ɧɚɞɡɨɪɭ ɨɬ 8 ɞɟɤɚɛɪɹ 2005 ɝ.ɋɚɧɤɬ-ɉɟɬɟɪɛɭɪɝ. (“Methodology of Determination of Harmful (Pollutant) Substance Dispersions in Ambient Air through Motor Traffic Moving on Highways”, developed by the Research Institute of Protection of Ambient Air (Research Institute Atmosphere) of the Federal Service on Ecological, Technological and Nuclear Supervision, 8th December, 2005, Saint-Petersburg)

2. ɍɉɊɁȺ «ɗɤɨɥɨɝ-3» ɋɚɧɤɬ-ɉɟɬɟɪɛɭɪɝ, 2005 ɝ.

Ecologist-3, Saint-Petersburg, 2005

54

Rig

ht A

lignm

ent

Veh

icle

em

issi

ons

g/km

G

roup

nu

mbe

r C

arbo

n ox

ide

Nitr

ogen

oxi

des

Hyd

roca

rbon

s So

ot

Sulp

hur

diox

ide

Form

alde

hyd

e B

enzo

pyre

ne

Mot

or 1

I-

1 5

1,3

1,1

0,03

0,

03

0,00

5 4E

-07

Mot

or 2

I-

2 2

0,7

0,4

0,02

0,

03

0,00

2 2E

-07

Min

i aut

obus

II

12

2

2,5

0,08

0,

06

0,01

1 8E

-07

Petr

ol a

utob

us

III

35

5,2

8,5

0 0,

04

0,04

1,

2E-0

6 D

iese

l aut

obus

IV

7

6 5

0,3

0,07

0,

025

0,00

0002

Pe

trol

truc

k> 3

,5t

V

60

5,2

10

0 0,

05

0,05

0,

0000

04

Die

sel t

ruck

< 12

t V

I 9

7 5,

5 0,

4 0,

1 0,

025

0,00

0002

D

iese

l tru

ck>

12 t

VII

12

8

6,5

0,5

0,12

0,

03

2,4E

-06

Mot

or 1

em

issi

on

I-1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

Mot

or 2

em

issi

on

I-2

0,06

9444

4 4 0,

0486

111

0,01

3888

889

0,00

0694

4 0,

0010

4167

6,

9444

E-0

5 6,

94E

-09

Min

i aut

obus

em

issi

on

II

0,16

6666

6 7 0,

0555

556

0,03

4722

222

0,00

1111

1 0,

0008

3333

0,

0001

5278

1,

11E

-08

Petr

ol a

utob

us e

mis

sion

II

I 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

Die

sel a

utob

us e

mis

sion

IV

0,

0097

222 2

0,01

6666

7 0,

0069

4444

4 0,

0004

167

9,72

22E

-05

3,47

22E

-05

2,78

E-0

9

Petr

ol tr

uck>

3,5

t em

issi

on

V

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 D

iese

l tru

ck<

12 t

VI

0,01

125

0,01

75

0,00

6875

0,

0005

0,

0001

25

0,00

0031

25

2,5E

-09

Die

sel t

ruck

> 12

t em

issi

on

VII

0

0 0

0 0

0 0

Tot

al

I+V

II

0,25

7083

3 3 0,

1383

333

0,06

2430

556

0,00

2722

2 0,

0020

9722

0,

0002

8819

2,

33E

-08

"M

L=(

(L-L

0)/3

600)

*Mk*

Gk*

Rv

Dat

a fo

r ri

ght a

lignm

ent

I-1

I-2

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

L k

m

1

L0

km

0

car/

hour

0

250

100

0 10

0

9 0

Sele

cted

spe

ed r

ate

0,5

55

Res

pect

ive

spee

d (k

m/h

our)

rat

e

10 (

km/h

our)

1,

35

0,03

4722

222

15 (

km/h

our)

1,

28

20

(km

/hou

r)

1,2

25

(km

/hou

r)

1,1

30

(km

/hou

r)

1

35 (

km/h

our)

0,

88

40

(km

/hou

r)

0,75

45 (

km/h

our)

0,

63

50

(km

/hou

r)

0,5

60

(km

/hou

r)

0,3

75

(km

/hou

r)

0,45

80 (

km/h

our)

0,

5

100

(km

/hou

r)

0,65

Tot

al f

or r

unni

ng tr

ack

gr/s

ec

Car

bon

oxid

e 0,

257

N

itrog

en o

xide

s, o

f w

hich

: 0,

138

N

itrog

en d

ioxi

de

0,11

1

Nitr

ogen

oxi

de

0,01

8

Hyd

roca

rbon

s (2

704)

0,

014

H

ydro

carb

ons

(273

2)

0,04

9

Soot

0,

003

Su

lphu

r di

oxid

e 0,

002

Fo

rmal

dehy

de

0,00

0

Ben

zopy

rene

2,

3333

3E-0

8

Lef

t Alig

nmen

t

Veh

icle

em

issi

ons

g/km

G

roup

nu

mbe

r C

arbo

n ox

ide

Nitr

ogen

oxi

des

Hyd

roca

rbon

s So

ot

Sulp

hur

diox

ide

Form

alde

hyd

e B

enzo

pyre

ne

Mot

or 1

I-

1 5

1,3

1,1

0,03

0,

03

0,00

5 4E

-07

Mot

or 2

I-

2 2

0,7

0,4

0,02

0,

03

0,00

2 2E

-07

Min

i aut

obus

II

12

2

2,5

0,08

0,

06

0,01

1 8E

-07

56

Petr

ol a

utob

us

III

35

5,2

8,5

0 0,

04

0,04

1,

2E-0

6 D

iese

l aut

obus

IV

7

6 5

0,3

0,07

0,

025

0,00

0002

Pe

trol

truc

k> 3

,5t

V

60

5,2

10

0 0,

05

0,05

0,

0000

04

Die

sel t

ruck

< 12

t V

I 9

7 5,

5 0,

4 0,

1 0,

025

0,00

0002

D

iese

l tru

ck>

12 t

VII

12

8

6,5

0,5

0,12

0,

03

2,4E

-06

Mot

or 1

em

issi

on

I-1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

Mot

or 2

em

issi

on

I-2

0,07

1388

8 9 0,

0499

722

0,01

4277

778

0,00

0713 9

0,00

1070

83

7,13

89E

-05

7,14

E-0

9

Min

i aut

obus

em

issi

on

II

0,16

8333

3 3 0,

0561

111

0,03

5069

444

0,00

1122 2

0,00

0841

67

0,00

0154

31

1,12

E-0

8 Pe

trol

aut

obus

em

issi

on

III

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

Die

sel a

utob

us e

mis

sion

IV

0,

0106

944 4

0,01

8333

3 0,

0076

3888

9 0,

0004

58 3 0,

0001

0694

3,

8194

E-0

5 3,

06E

-09

Petr

ol tr

uck>

3,5

t em

issi

on

V

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 D

iese

l tru

ck<

12 t

VI

0,01

125

0,01

75

0,00

6875

0,

0005

0,

0001

25

0,00

0031

25

2,5E

-09

Die

sel t

ruck

> 12

t em

issi

on

VII

0

0 0

0 0

0 0

Tot

al

I+V

II

0,26

1666

6 7 0,

1419

167

0,06

3861

111

0,00

2794 4

0,00

2144

44

0,00

0295

14

2,39

E-0

8

"ML

=((L

-L

0)/3

600)

*Mk*

Gk*

Rv

Dat

a fo

r ri

ght a

lignm

ent

I-1

I-2

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

L k

m

1

L0

km

0

car/

hour

0

257

101

0 11

0

9 0

Sele

cted

spe

ed r

ate

0,5

Res

pect

ive

spee

d (k

m/h

our)

rat

e

10 (

km/h

our)

1,

35

0,03

5069

444

15 (

km/h

our)

1,

28

20

(km

/hou

r)

1,2

25

(km

/hou

r)

1,1

57

30 (

km/h

our)

1

35

(km

/hou

r)

0,88

40 (

km/h

our)

0,

75

45

(km

/hou

r)

0,63

50 (

km/h

our)

0,

5

60 (

km/h

our)

0,

3

75 (

km/h

our)

0,

45

80

(km

/hou

r)

0,5

10

0 (k

m/h

our)

0,

65

Tot

al f

or r

unni

ng tr

ack

gr/s

ec

Car

bon

oxid

e 0,

262

N

itrog

en o

xide

s, o

f w

hich

: 0,

142

N

itrog

en d

ioxi

de

0,11

4

Nitr

ogen

oxi

de

0,01

8

Hyd

roca

rbon

s (2

704)

0,

014

H

ydro

carb

ons

(273

2)

0,05

0

Soot

0,

003

Su

lphu

r di

oxid

e 0,

002

Fo

rmal

dehy

de

0,00

0

Ben

zopy

rene

2,

3916

7E-0

8

58

Total Emissions Calculations of vehicle emission Town Tbilisi-Rustavi Highway Tbilisi-Rustavi highway Section Tbilisi-Rustavi 1 km section Date in section

Coordinates X (m) Y(m) Z (width)

Start 507 1004 15 End 956 95 Section length 1 Data on transport flows

Vehicle type, unit/hour (Gk) Right Left km/h Rate Alignment Alignment

Motor 1 0 0 80 0,5 Motor 2 250 257 Mini autobus 100 101 Petrol autobus 0 0 Diesel autobus 10 11 Petrol truck> 3,5t 0 0 Diesel truck< 12 t 9 9 Data on section emission

Substance name Code Strength of total emission (g/sec)

Carbon oxide (CO) 337 0,51875 Nitrogen oxide (NOx) 3000 0,28025 Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 301 0,2242 Nitrogen oxide (NO) 304 0,0364325 Hydrocarbons (petrol fraction) 2704 0,028166667 Hydrocarbons (diesel fraction) 2732 0,098125 Soot 328 0,005516667 Sulphur dioxide 330 0,004241667 Formaldehyde 1325 0,000583333 Benzopyrene 703 4,725E-08

59

Rig

ht A

lignm

ent

Veh

icle

em

issi

ons

g/km

G

roup

nu

mbe

r C

arbo

n ox

ide

Nitr

ogen

oxi

des

Hyd

roca

rbon

s So

ot

Sulp

hur

diox

ide

Form

alde

hyd

e B

enzo

pyre

ne

Mot

or 1

I-

1 5

1,3

1,1

0,03

0,

03

0,00

5 4E

-07

Mot

or 2

I-

2 2

0,7

0,4

0,02

0,

03

0,00

2 2E

-07

Min

i aut

obus

II

12

2

2,5

0,08

0,

06

0,01

1 8E

-07

Petr

ol a

utob

us

III

35

5,2

8,5

0 0,

04

0,04

1,

2E-0

6 D

iese

l aut

obus

IV

7

6 5

0,3

0,07

0,

025

0,00

0002

Pe

trol

truc

k> 3

,5t

V

60

5,2

10

0 0,

05

0,05

0,

0000

04

Die

sel t

ruck

< 12

t V

I 9

7 5,

5 0,

4 0,

1 0,

025

0,00

0002

D

iese

l tru

ck>

12 t

VII

12

8

6,5

0,5

0,12

0,

03

2,4E

-06

Mot

or 1

em

issi

on

I-1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 M

otor

2em

issi

on

I-2

0,1

0,07

0,

02

0,00

1 0,

0015

0,

0001

1E

-08

Min

i aut

obus

emis

sion

II

0,

2333

333 3

0,07

7777

8 0,

0486

1111

1 0,

0015

55 6 0,

0011

6667

0,

0002

1389

1,

56E

-08

Petr

ol a

utob

usem

issi

on

III

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

Die

sel a

utob

usem

issi

on

IV

0,01

3611

1 1 0,

0233

333

0,00

9722

222

0,00

0583 3

0,00

0136

11

4,86

11E

-05

3,89

E-0

9

Petr

ol tr

uck>

3,5

t em

issi

on

V

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

Die

sel t

ruck

< 12

t V

I 0,

0162

5 0,

0252

778

0,00

9930

556

0,00

0722 2

0,00

0180

56

4,51

39E

-05

3,61

E-0

9

Die

sel t

ruck

> 12

t em

issi

on

VII

0

0 0

0 0

0 0

Tot

al

I+V

II

0,36

3194

4 4 0,

1963

889

0,08

8263

889

0,00

3861 1

0,00

2983

33

0,00

0407

64

3,31

E-0

8

"ML

=((L

-L

0)/3

600)

*Mk*

Gk*

Rv

Dat

a fo

r ri

ght a

lignm

ent

I-1

I-2

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

L k

m

1

L0

km

0

car/

hour

0

360

140

0 14

0

13

0

Sele

cted

spe

ed r

ate

0,5

60

Res

pect

ive

spee

d (k

m/h

our)

rat

e

10 (

km/h

our)

1,

35

0,04

8611

111

15 (

km/h

our)

1,

28

20

(km

/hou

r)

1,2

25

(km

/hou

r)

1,1

30

(km

/hou

r)

1

35 (

km/h

our)

0,

88

40

(km

/hou

r)

0,75

45 (

km/h

our)

0,

63

50

(km

/hou

r)

0,5

60

(km

/hou

r)

0,3

75

(km

/hou

r)

0,45

80 (

km/h

our)

0,

5

100

(km

/hou

r)

0,65

Tot

al f

or r

unni

ng tr

ack

gr/s

ec

Car

bon

oxid

e 0,

363

N

itrog

en o

xide

s, o

f w

hich

: 0,

196

N

itrog

en d

ioxi

de

0,15

7

Nitr

ogen

oxi

de

0,02

6

Hyd

roca

rbon

s (2

704)

0,

020

H

ydro

carb

ons

(273

2)

0,06

8

Soot

0,

004

Su

lphu

r di

oxid

e 0,

003

Fo

rmal

dehy

de

0,00

0

Ben

zopy

rene

3,

3055

6E-0

8

Lef

t Alig

nmen

t

Veh

icle

em

issi

ons

g/km

G

roup

nu

mbe

r C

arbo

n ox

ide

Nitr

ogen

oxi

des

Hyd

roca

rbon

s So

ot

Sulp

hur

diox

ide

Form

alde

hyd

e B

enzo

pyre

ne

Mot

or 1

I-

1 5

1,3

1,1

0,03

0,

03

0,00

5 4E

-07

Mot

or 2

I-

2 2

0,7

0,4

0,02

0,

03

0,00

2 2E

-07

Min

i aut

obus

II

12

2

2,5

0,08

0,

06

0,01

1 8E

-07

61

Petr

ol a

utob

us

III

35

5,2

8,5

0 0,

04

0,04

1,

2E-0

6 D

iese

l aut

obus

IV

7

6 5

0,3

0,07

0,

025

0,00

0002

Pe

trol

truc

k> 3

,5t

V

60

5,2

10

0 0,

05

0,05

0,

0000

04

Die

sel t

ruck

< 12

t V

I 9

7 5,

5 0,

4 0,

1 0,

025

0,00

0002

D

iese

l tru

ck>

12 t

VII

12

8

6,5

0,5

0,12

0,

03

2,4E

-06

Mot

or 1

em

issi

on

I-1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

Mot

or 2

em

issi

on

I-2

0,10

1111

1 1 0,

0707

778

0,02

0222

222

0,00

1011 1

0,00

1516

67

0,00

0101

11

1,01

E-0

8

Min

i aut

obus

em

issi

on

II

0,24

3333

3 3 0,

0811

111

0,05

0694

444

0,00

1622 2

0,00

1216

67

0,00

0223

06

1,62

E-0

8 Pe

trol

aut

obus

em

issi

on

III

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

Die

sel a

utob

us e

mis

sion

IV

0,

0155

555 6

0,02

6666

7 0,

0111

1111

1 0,

0006

66 7 0,

0001

5556

5,

5556

E-0

5 4,

44E

-09

Petr

ol tr

uck>

3,5

t em

issi

on

V

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

Die

sel t

ruck

< 12

t V

I 0,

015

0,02

3333

3 0,

0091

6666

7 0,

0006

66 7 0,

0001

6667

4,

1667

E-0

5 3,

33E

-09

Die

sel t

ruck

> 12

t em

issi

on

VII

0

0 0

0 0

0 0

Tot

al

I+V

II

0,37

5 0,

2018

889

0,09

1194

444

0,00

3966 7

0,00

3055

56

0,00

0421

39

3,41

E-0

8

"ML

=((L

-L

0)/3

600)

*Mk*

Gk*

Rv

Dat

a fo

r ri

ght a

lignm

ent

I-1

I-2

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

L k

m

1

L0

km

0

car/

hour

0

364

146

0 16

0

12

0

Sele

cted

spe

ed r

ate

0,5

Res

pect

ive

spee

d (k

m/h

our)

rat

e

10 (

km/h

our)

1,

35

0,05

0694

444

15 (

km/h

our)

1,

28

20

(km

/hou

r)

1,2

62

25 (

km/h

our)

1,

1

30 (

km/h

our)

1

35

(km

/hou

r)

0,88

40 (

km/h

our)

0,

75

45

(km

/hou

r)

0,63

50 (

km/h

our)

0,

5

60 (

km/h

our)

0,

3

75 (

km/h

our)

0,

45

80

(km

/hou

r)

0,5

10

0 (k

m/h

our)

0,

65

Tot

al f

or r

unni

ng tr

ack

gr/s

ec

Car

bon

oxid

e 0,

375

N

itrog

en o

xide

s, o

f w

hich

: 0,

202

N

itrog

en d

ioxi

de

0,16

2

Nitr

ogen

oxi

de

0,02

6

Hyd

roca

rbon

s (2

704)

0,

020

H

ydro

carb

ons

(273

2)

0,07

1

Soot

0,

004

Su

lphu

r di

oxid

e 0,

003

Fo

rmal

dehy

de

0,00

0

Ben

zopy

rene

3,

4111

1E-

08

63

Total Emissions Calculations of vehicle emission Town Tbilisi-Rustavi Highway Tbilisi-Rustavi highway Section Tbilisi-Rustavi 1 km section Date in section

Coordinates X (m) Y(m) Z (width)

Start 507 1004 15 End 956 95 Section length 1 Data on transport flows

Vehicle type, unit/hour (Gk) Right Left km/h Rate Alignment Alignment

Motor 1 0 0 80 0,5 Motor 2 360 364 Mini autobus 140 146 Petrol autobus 0 0 Diesel autobus 14 16 Petrol truck> 3,5t 0 0 Diesel truck< 12 t 13 12 Diesel truck<12 t 0 0 Data on section emission

Substance name Code Strength of total emission (g/sec)

Carbon oxide (CO) 337 0,738194444 Nitrogen oxide (NOx) 3000 0,398277778 Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 301 0,318622222 Nitrogen oxide (NO) 304 0,051776111 Hydrocarbons (petrol fraction) 2704 0,040222222 Hydrocarbons (diesel fraction) 2732 0,139236111 Soot 328 0,007827778 Sulphur dioxide 330 0,006038889 Formaldehyde 1325 0,000829028 Benzopyrene 703 6,71667E-08

64

ɍɉɊɁȺɗɄɈɅɈȽ, ɜɟɪɫɢɹ 3.00 / Ecologist, Version 3.0 Copyright © 1990-2009 ɎɂɊɆȺ "ɂɇɌȿȽɊȺɅ" / 1990-2009 Company “Integral”

Plant number 313; road Town Tbilisi-Rustavi

Initial data version: 2, road 2011 Calculation version: road 2011 Calculation completed for: summer Calculation module: "ɈɇȾ-86" Calculable constants: E1= 0,01, E2=0,01, E3=0,01, S=999999,99 sq.km.

Meteorological Parameters

Average air temperature of the hottest month 30,8° C Average air temperature of the coldest month -2,4° C Rate depending on the air stratification temperature, A 200 Maximum wind speed for the given territory (excess recurrence within 5 %) 8 m/sec

Plant Structure (Squares, Workshop)

Number Square (workshop) name

65

Dis

pers

ion

Sour

ce P

aram

eter

s

Rec

ords

: So

urce

type

s:

"%"

- So

urce

con

side

red

with

exc

lusi

on o

f ba

ckgr

ound

; 1

- Po

int;

"+"

- So

urce

con

side

red

with

out e

xclu

sion

of

back

grou

nd;

2 -

Lin

ear;

"-

" -S

ourc

e is

not

con

side

red

and

its s

hare

not

incl

uded

in th

e ba

ckgr

ound

. 3

- U

norg

aniz

ed;

4

–Uni

ty o

f po

int s

ourc

es f

or c

alcu

latio

n in

one

pla

ne;

5

–Uno

rgan

ized

with

dis

pers

ion

stre

ngth

cha

ngin

g ov

er ti

me;

6

–Poi

nt s

ourc

es w

ith u

mbr

ella

or

hori

zont

al d

ispe

rsio

n;

7

–Uni

ty o

f po

int s

ourc

es w

ith u

mbr

ella

or

hori

zont

al d

ispe

rsio

n;

8

- H

ighw

ay.

Rec

ord

s du

rin g

ot

her

calc

ula

tion

Squa

re

# W

orks

hop

# So

urce

#

Sour

ce n

ame

Ver

sio n T

ype

Sour

ce

heig

ht

(m)

Dia

met

er

(m)

Air

m

ixtu

re

volu

me

(m3/

sec)

Air

m

ixtu

re

spee

d (m

/sec

)

Air

m

ixtu

re

tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

Rel

ief

rate

C

oord

. X1

axis

(m)

Coo

rd. Y

1 ax

is (m

) C

oord

.. X

2 ax

is (m

) C

oord

. Y2

axis

(m)

Sour

ce

wid

th (m

)

%

0 0

1 H

ighw

ay

18

2,0

0,00

00,

0000

0 0

1,0

507,

010

04,0

956,

095

,015

,00

Subs

t. C

ode

Subs

tanc

e D

ispe

rsio

n (g

/sec

)D

ispe

rsio

n (t

/yea

r)F

sum

.:C

m/M

PC

Xm

U

m

win

t.:

Cm

/MPC

X

m

Um

03

04

Nitr

ogen

(II)

oxi

de (

nitr

ogen

oxi

de)

0,03

6000

0 0,

0000

000

1

3,21

4 11

,4

0,5

3,

214

11,4

0,

5 03

28

Bla

ck c

arbo

n (s

oot)

0,

0060

000

0,00

0000

0 1

1,

429

11,4

0,

5

1,42

9 11

,4

0,5

0330

Su

lphu

r di

oxid

e 0,

0050

000

0,00

0000

0 1

0,

357

11,4

0,

5

0,35

7 11

,4

0,5

0337

C

arbo

n ox

ide

0,51

9000

0 0,

0000

000

1

3,70

7 11

,4

0,5

3,

707

11,4

0,

5 07

03

Ben

zopy

rene

(3,4

-ben

zopy

rene

) 5,

0000

00e-

8 0,

0000

000

1

0,17

9 11

,4

0,5

0,

179

11,4

0,

5 13

25

Form

alde

hyde

0,

0006

000

0,00

0000

0 1

0,

612

11,4

0,

5

0,61

2 11

,4

0,5

2704

Pe

trol

fra

ctio

n 0,

0290

000

0,00

0000

0 1

0,

207

11,4

0,

5

0,20

7 11

,4

0,5

2732

Pa

raff

in f

ract

ion

0,09

9000

0 0,

0000

000

1

2,94

7 11

,4

0,5

2,

947

11,4

0,

5 03

01

Nitr

ogen

dio

xide

0,

2240

000

0,00

0000

0 1

40

,003

11

,4

0,5

40

,003

11

,4

0,5

66

Emissions from Source by Substances

Records: Source types: "%" - Source considered with exclusion of background; 1 - Point; "+" - Source considered without exclusion of background; 2 - Linear; "-" -Source is not considered and its share not included in the background. 3 - Unorganized; 4 –Unity of point sources for calculation in one plane; (-) marked or unmarked () sources are not considered in the total sum 5 –Unorganized with dispersion strength changing over time; 6 –Point sources with umbrella or horizontal dispersion;

7 –Unity of point sources with umbrella or horizontal dispersion;

8 - Highway.

Substance: 0304 Nitrogen (II) Oxide (nitrogenoxide)

#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter

Cm/MPC Xm Um (m/sec)


0 0 1 8 % 0,0360000 1 3,2145 11,40 0,5000 3,2145 11,40 0,5000total: 0,0360000 3,2145 3,2145

Substance: 0328 Black Carbon (Soot)

#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 1 8 % 0,0060000 1 1,4287 11,40 0,5000 1,4287 11,40 0,5000total: 0,0060000 1,4287 1,4287

Substance: 0330 SulphurDioxide

#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 1 8 % 0,0050000 1 0,3572 11,40 0,5000 0,3572 11,40 0,5000total: 0,0050000 0,3572 0,3572

Substance: 0337 CarbonOxide

#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 1 8 % 0,5190000 1 3,7074 11,40 0,5000 3,7074 11,40 0,5000total: 0,5190000 3,7074 3,7074

Substance: 0703 Benzopyrene (3,4-Benzopyrene)

#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 1 8 % 5,000000e-8 1 0,1786 11,40 0,5000 0,1786 11,40 0,5000total: 5,000000e-8 0,1786 0,1786

67

Substance: 1325 Formaldehyde

# squar

e

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 1 8 % 0,0006000 1 0,6123 11,40 0,5000 0,6123 11,40 0,5000total: 0,0006000 0,6123 0,6123

Substance: 2704 Petrol Fraction

#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 1 8 % 0,0290000 1 0,2072 11,40 0,5000 0,2072 11,40 0,5000total: 0,0290000 0,2072 0,2072

Substance: 2732 Paraffin Fraction

#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 1 8 % 0,0990000 1 2,9466 11,40 0,5000 2,9466 11,40 0,5000total: 0,0990000 2,9466 2,9466

Substance: 0301 NitrogenDioxide

#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 1 8 % 0,2240000 1 40,0025 11,40 0,5000 40,0025 11,40 0,5000total: 0,2240000 40,0025 40,0025

Source Dispersion by Total Impact Groups



8 - Highway.

Total impact group: 6053

#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

Code dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter

Cm/MPC Xm Um (m/sec) Cm/MPC Xm Um (m/sec)0 0 1 8 % 0330 0,0050000 1 0,3572 11,40 0,5000 0,3572 11,40 0,50000 0 1 8 % 0301 0,2240000 1 40,0025 11,40 0,5000 40,0025 11,40 0,5000

total: 0,2290000 40,3597 40,3597

Calculation Completed by Substances (Total Impact Groups)

68

Code substance Maximum Permissible Concentration Rate of ecologic situation

Background concentration

Type Handbook

value Used in

calculation Records Interp.

0304 Nitrogen (II) oxide (nitrogenoxide) max. unit 0,4000000 0,4000000 1 No No 0328 Black carbon (soot) max. unit 0,1500000 0,1500000 1 No No 0330 Sulphur dioxide max. unit 0,5000000 0,5000000 1 No No 0337 Carbonoxide max. unit. 5,0000000 5,0000000 1 No No 0703 Benzopyrene (3,4-benzopyrene) MPCaverage

daily * 10 0,0000010 0,0000100 1 No No

1325 Formaldehyde max. unit 0,0350000 0,0350000 1 No No 2704 Petrol fraction max. unit 5,0000000 5,0000000 1 No No 2732 Paraffin fraction Orient. safe

impact level 1,2000000 1,2000000 1 No No

0301 Nitrogen dioxide max. unit 0,2000000 0,2000000 1 No No 6053 Total impact group (2) 0301 330 Group - - 1 No No

Sorting of Calculable Meteo-Parameters

Automatic Sorting

Wind speed sorting is completed automatically

Wind direction

Sector start Sector end Wind soring step

0 360 1

Calculable Area

Calculable Squares

# Type Full square description Width (m)

Step (m)

Height (m)

Comment

Middle point coordinates, I side

(m)

Middle point coordinates, II side(m)

X Y X Y X Y 1 Given 0 550 1500 550 1100 25 25 2

Calculable Points

# Point coordinates (m) Height

(m) Point type Comment

X Y 1 558,00 999,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 2 727,00 654,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 3 781,00 547,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 4 926,00 252,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 5 548,00 825,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 6 690,00 530,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 7 866,00 181,00 2 Point at the border with populated area

Calculation Results by Substances

(Calculable Points)

Point types: 0 –User calculable point 1 –Point at the border with protection zone 2 –Point at the border with industrial zone

69

3 –Point at the border with sanitary-protection zone 4 –Point at the border with populated area 5 –At the border of development

# Coord.X(m)

Coord.Y(m) Height (m) Concentration (MPC

share)

Wind direction

Wind speed Background (MPC share)

Background before exclusion

Point type


7 866 181 2 0,06 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,06 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,06 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,06 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,06 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,05 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,05 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 0,03 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,03 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,03 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,02 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,02 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,02 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,02 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 6,3e-3 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 6,3e-3 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 45 548 825 2 6,3e-3 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 6,2e-3 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 6,1e-3 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 6,0e-3 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 5,7e-3 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 0,07 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,06 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,06 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 41 558 999 2 0,06 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 42 727 654 2 0,06 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,06 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,06 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4

Substance: 0703 Benzopyrene (3,4-benzopyrene)

7 866 181 2 3,1e-3 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 3,1e-3 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 3,1e-3 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 3,1e-3 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 3,1e-3 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 3,0e-3 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 2,9e-3 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 0,01 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,01 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4

70

5 548 825 2 0,01 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,01 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,01 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,01 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 9,8e-3 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 3,6e-3 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 3,6e-3 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 3,6e-3 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 3,6e-3 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 3,6e-3 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 3,5e-3 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 3,3e-3 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 0,05 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 44 926 252 2 0,05 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,05 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,05 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,05 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,05 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,05 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 0,70 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,70 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 45 548 825 2 0,70 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 41 558 999 2 0,70 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,69 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,67 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,64 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4

Substance: 6053 Total Impact Group (2) 0301 330

7 866 181 2 0,44 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,44 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,44 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,44 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 42 727 654 2 0,43 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 43 781 547 2 0,42 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,40 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4

71

ɍɉɊɁȺɗɄɈɅɈȽ, ɜɟɪɫɢɹ 3.00 / Ecologist, Version 3.0

Copyright © 1990-2009 ɎɂɊɆȺ "ɂɇɌȿȽɊȺɅ" / 1990-2009 Company “Integral”

Plant number 313; road Town Tbilisi-Rustavi

Initial data version: 3, road 2016 Calculation version: road 2016 Calculation completed for: summer Calculation module: "ɈɇȾ-86" Calculable constants: E1= 0,01, E2=0,01, E3=0,01, S=999999,99 sq.km.

Meteorological Parameters

Average air temperature of the hottest month 30,8° C Average air temperature of the coldest month -2,4° C Rate depending on the air stratification temperature, A 200 Maximum wind speed for the given territory (excess recurrence within 5 %) 8 m/sec

Plant Structure (Squares, Workshop)

Number Square (workshop) name

72

Dis

pers

ion

Sour

ce P

aram

eter

s

Rec

ords

: So

urce

type

s:

"%"

- So

urce

con

side

red

with

exc

lusi

on o

f ba

ckgr

ound

; 1

- Po

int;

"+"

- So

urce

con

side

red

with

out e

xclu

sion

of

back

grou

nd;

2 -

Lin

ear;

"-

" -S

ourc

e is

not

con

side

red

and

its s

hare

not

incl

uded

in th

e ba

ckgr

ound

. 3

- U

norg

aniz

ed;

4

–Uni

ty o

f po

int s

ourc

es f

or c

alcu

latio

n in

one

pla

ne;

5

–Uno

rgan

ized

with

dis

pers

ion

stre

ngth

cha

ngin

g ov

er ti

me;

6

–Poi

nt s

ourc

es w

ith u

mbr

ella

or

hori

zont

al d

ispe

rsio

n;

7

–Uni

ty o

f po

int s

ourc

es w

ith u

mbr

ella

or

hori

zont

al d

ispe

rsio

n;

8

- H

ighw

ay.

Rec

ord

s du

rin g

ot

her

calc

ula

tion

Squa

re

# W

orks

hop

# So

urce

#

Sour

ce n

ame

Ver

sio n T

ype

Sour

ce

heig

ht

(m)

Dia

met

er

(m)

Air

m

ixtu

re

volu

me

(m3/

sec)

Air

m

ixtu

re

spee

d (m

/sec

)

Air

m

ixtu

re

tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

Rel

ief

rate

C

oord

. X1

axis

(m)

Coo

rd. Y

1 ax

is (m

) C

oord

.. X

2 ax

is (m

) C

oord

. Y2

axis

(m)

Sour

ce

wid

th (m

)

%

0 0

1 H

ighw

ay

18

2,0

0,00

00,

0000

0 0

1,0

507,

010

04,0

956,

095

,015

,00

Subs

t. C

ode

Subs

tanc

e D

ispe

rsio

n (g

/sec

)D

ispe

rsio

n (t

/yea

r)F

sum

.:C

m/M

PC

Xm

U

m

win

t.:

Cm

/MPC

X

m

Um

03

04

Nitr

ogen

(II)

oxi

de (

nitr

ogen

oxi

de)

0,05

2000

0 0,

0000

000

1

4,64

3 11

,4

0,5

4,

643

11,4

0,

5 03

28

Bla

ck c

arbo

n (s

oot)

0,

0080

000

0,00

0000

0 1

1,

905

11,4

0,

5

1,90

5 11

,4

0,5

0330

Su

lphu

r di

oxid

e 0,

0060

000

0,00

0000

0 1

0,

429

11,4

0,

5

0,42

9 11

,4

0,5

0337

C

arbo

n ox

ide

0,73

9000

0 0,

0000

000

1

5,27

9 11

,4

0,5

5,

279

11,4

0,

5 07

03

Ben

zopy

rene

(3,4

-ben

zopy

rene

) 7,

0000

00e-

8 0,

0000

000

1

0,25

0 11

,4

0,5

0,

250

11,4

0,

5 13

25

Form

alde

hyde

0,

0009

000

0,00

0000

0 1

0,

918

11,4

0,

5

0,91

8 11

,4

0,5

2704

Pe

trol

fra

ctio

n 0,

0400

000

0,00

0000

0 1

0,

286

11,4

0,

5

0,28

6 11

,4

0,5

2732

Pa

raff

in f

ract

ion

0,14

0000

0 0,

0000

000

1

4,16

7 11

,4

0,5

4,

167

11,4

0,

5 03

01

Nitr

ogen

dio

xide

0,

3180

000

0,00

0000

0 1

56

,789

11

,4

0,5

56

,789

11

,4

0,5

73

Emissions from Source by Substances



8 - Highway.


#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 11 8 % 0,0520000 1 4,6431 11,40 0,5000 4,6431 11,40 0,5000total: 0,0520000 4,6431 4,6431


#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 11 8 % 0,0080000 1 1,9049 11,40 0,5000 1,9049 11,40 0,5000total: 0,0080000 1,9049 1,9049


#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 11 8 % 0,0060000 1 0,4286 11,40 0,5000 0,4286 11,40 0,5000total: 0,0060000 0,4286 0,4286


#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 11 8 % 0,7390000 1 5,2789 11,40 0,5000 5,2789 11,40 0,5000total: 0,7390000 5,2789 5,2789

Substance: 0703 Benzopyrene (3,4-Benzopyrene)

# # # Type Recor dispersion F Summer Winter

74

square

workshop

source

d (g/sec)



0 0 11 8 % 7,000000e-8 1 0,2500 11,40 0,5000 0,2500 11,40 0,5000total: 7,000000e-8 0,2500 0,2500


#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 11 8 % 0,0009000 1 0,9184 11,40 0,5000 0,9184 11,40 0,5000total: 0,0009000 0,9184 0,9184


#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 11 8 % 0,0400000 1 0,2857 11,40 0,5000 0,2857 11,40 0,5000total: 0,0400000 0,2857 0,2857


#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 11 8 % 0,1400000 1 4,1669 11,40 0,5000 4,1669 11,40 0,5000total: 0,1400000 4,1669 4,1669


#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter



0 0 11 8 % 0,3180000 1 56,7893 11,40 0,5000 56,7893 11,40 0,5000total: 0,3180000 56,7893 56,7893

Source Dispersion by Total Impact Groups


75


8 - Highway.

Total impact group: 6053

#

square

# workshop

# sourc

e

Type Record

Code dispersion (g/sec)

F Summer Winter

Cm/MPC Xm Um (m/sec) Cm/MPC Xm Um (m/sec)0 0 1 8 % 0330 0,0060000 1 0,4286 11,40 0,5000 0,4286 11,40 0,50000 0 1 8 % 0301 0,3180000 1 56,7893 11,40 0,5000 56,7893 11,40 0,5000

total: 0,3240000 57,2179 57,2179

Calculation Completed by Substances (Total Impact Groups)

Code substance Maximum Permissible Concentration Rate of

ecologic situation

Background concentration

Type Handbook

value Used in

calculation Records Interp.

0304 Nitrogen (II) oxide (nitrogenoxide) max. unit 0,4000000 0,4000000 1 No No 0328 Black carbon (soot) max. unit 0,1500000 0,1500000 1 No No 0330 Sulphur dioxide max. unit 0,5000000 0,5000000 1 No No 0337 Carbonoxide max. unit. 5,0000000 5,0000000 1 No No 0703 Benzopyrene (3,4-benzopyrene) MPCaverage

daily * 10 0,0000010 0,0000100 1 No No

1325 Formaldehyde max. unit 0,0350000 0,0350000 1 No No 2704 Petrol fraction max. unit 5,0000000 5,0000000 1 No No 2732 Paraffin fraction Orient. safe

impact level 1,2000000 1,2000000 1 No No

0301 Nitrogen dioxide max. unit 0,2000000 0,2000000 1 No No 6053 Total impact group (2) 0301 330 Group - - 1 No No

Sorting of Calculable Meteo-Parameters

Automatic Sorting

Wind speed sorting is completed automatically

Wind direction

Sector start Sector end Wind soring step

0 360 1

Calculable Area

Calculable Squares

# Type Full square description Width (m)

Step (m)

Height (m)

Comment

Middle point coordinates, I side

(m)

Middle point coordinates, II side(m)

X Y X Y X Y

76

1 Given 0 550 1500 550 1100 25 25 2

Calculable Points

# Point coordinates (m) Height (m)

Point type Comment

X Y 1 558,00 999,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 2 727,00 654,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 3 781,00 547,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 4 926,00 252,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 5 548,00 825,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 6 690,00 530,00 2 Point at the border with populated area 7 866,00 181,00 2 Point at the border with populated area

Calculation Results by Substances

(Calculable Points)

Point types: 0 –User calculable point 1 –Point at the border with protection zone 2 –Point at the border with industrial zone 3 –Point at the border with sanitary-protection zone 4 –Point at the border with populated area 5 –At the border of development # Coord.X(m

) Coord.Y(m) Height (m) Concentrati

on (MPC share)

Wind direction

Wind speed Background (MPC share)

Background before exclusion

Point type


7 866 181 2 0,08 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,08 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,08 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,08 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,08 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,08 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,07 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 0,03 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,03 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,03 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,03 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,03 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,03 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,03 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 7,5e-3 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 7,5e-3 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 7,5e-3 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4

77

1 558 999 2 7,5e-3 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 7,4e-3 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 7,2e-3 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 6,9e-3 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 0,09 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,09 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,09 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,09 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,09 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,09 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,08 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4

Substance: 0703 Benzopyrene (3,4-benzopyrene)

7 866 181 2 4,4e-3 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 4,4e-3 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 4,4e-3 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 4,4e-3 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 4,3e-3 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 4,2e-3 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 4,0e-3 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 0,02 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,02 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,02 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,02 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,02 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,02 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,01 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 0,07 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,07 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,07 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,07 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,07 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,07 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,07 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4


7 866 181 2 0,07 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,07 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,07 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,07 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,07 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,07 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,07 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4

78


7 866 181 2 1,00 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 1,00 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,99 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,99 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,98 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,95 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,91 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4

Substance: 6053 Total Impact Group (2) 0301 330

7 866 181 2 0,63 1 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 4 926 252 2 0,63 306 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 5 548 825 2 0,63 126 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 1 558 999 2 0,62 181 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 2 727 654 2 0,61 184 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 3 781 547 2 0,60 302 0,50 0,000 0,000 4 6 690 530 2 0,57 120 0,50 0,000 0,000 4

79

ANNEX 4.

LICENSED QUARRIES IN PROJECT AREA

81

License No. 100620

Brief geo-information package

Position Information question list 1 Ore recovery object - Karajalari sand and gravel manifestation 2 Location of the ore recovery object and general description of the area

2.1 Region - Kvemo Kartli 2.2 Administrative district - Gardabani 2.3 The nearest settled area - Village Karajalari 2.4 Distance from an important point - 6-8 km north-west of the city of Rustavi and 2 km

in the same direction from village Karajalari 2.5 Distance from the nearest road axis - 850-865 m north-east (the nearest distance) 2.6 Distance from the state border and coastline - 30-31 km north-west of the state border

(the nearest distance) 2.7 Distance from the nearest bridge -2.8 River basin and mountain system - the river Mtkvari basin 2.9 Nomenclature of the ore recovery object Ʉ-38-90-Ȼ-ɛ and linear coordinates - the

coordinates of the tops of the object angles are fixed and plotted on a topographic map scaled 1:10000 by LEPL National Environmental Agency.

No. X Y 1 494419 4608648 2 494604 4608708 3 494688 4608440 4 494554 4608385

S=4,86 ha WGS 1984

2.10 Absolute height of the ore recovery object from sea level 350-355 m. 2.11 Climatic conditions - moderately humid, Continental. 2.12 Traditional industrial branches - agriculture 2.13 Drinking and technical water - drinking water is supplied from the village water-

supply system and the technical water is supplied from the river Mtkvari. 3 Forest resources

3.1 Regional forest department - not fixed 3.2 Resort zone forest - not fixed 3.3 Green zone forest - not fixed 3.4 State protection forest zone - not fixed 3.5 Floodplain forest - not fixed 3.6 A 300-m-wide forest area adjacent to the subalpine zone - not fixed 3.7 Up to 100-ha forest area between deforested areas - not fixed 3.8 Category of the protected areas of the state forest fund - not fixed 3.9 Up to 200-m-wide forest band along the permanent beds of snow avalanches or

mudflows - not fixed 3.10 A forest area with Red-listed woody plants, as well forest areas with special

82

economic designation (forest seed production, honey-producing plant growing, etc.) - not fixed

3.11 Forest area in 1 km radius of holiday inns, boarding houses or medicinal establishments or mineral springs (the distance is limited to a watershed) - not fixed

3.12 Up to 300-m-wide coast-protection forest area along the rivers, lakes, water reservoirs and water channels (beds) - not fixed

3.13 Up to 100-m-wide forest band near the escarps, landslid sites, taluses, karst formations and mountain mother rocks outcropping areas on the ground - not fixed

3.14 Up to 100-m-wide forest band along the railways and motor roads (from their subgrades) - not fixed

3.15 The territory where the forest exploitation is envisaged for recreational purposes - not fixed

3.16 Slopes with over 20º inclination - not fixed 3.17 State forest fund area with over 50 m3 woody resources per ha - not fixed 3.18 State forest fund area with the unconvertible natural forest regeneration process -

not fixed 3.19 State forest fund area with over 50% of its area covered with bushes - not fixed 3.20 State forest fund area with the special timber producing license or special hunting

industry license or forest exploitation general license issued - not fixed 3.21 Forest station (a former forest unit), ranger’s unit number - not fixed 3.22 Quarter(s) No. - not fixed 3.23 Liter(s) No. - not fixed 3.24 Total area of liter(s) - not fixed 3.25 areas covered with forest among them (ha) - not fixed 3.26 areas not covered with forest among them (ha) - not fixed 3.27 Dominant species - not fixed 3.28 Volume and species of erected trees and forest on the sample area - not fixed 3.29 Additional data about forest resources

4 Geological position of the ore recovery object 4.1 Geology of the ore-bearing area - folded system of the Lesser Caucasioni; Aspindza-

Tbilisi sector of the southern sub-zone of Ajara-Trialeti zone. The geological description is given similar to the near Lochino II manifestation. The site of manifestation is built with the Tertiary and Quaternary deposits.

4.2 Ore-bearing capacity - both sites of ore manifestation are located 1,5-2 km south-west of village Karajalari. The license areas cover the floodplain terrace of the river Mtkvari. Inert material is presented by sand, gravel and blocks with sandy clay interlayers. Sand comes with different granularity and is of a grey or yellowish grey color. It is made up mostly of the fragments of sedimentary rocks and rarely of volcanogenic rocks. In a petrographic respect, the inert material is made up of sandstones, limestones, porphyries, andesites, basalts and rarely of granitoides, quartz and silicificated rocks. The sand-and-gravel material is well-processed and classified.

4.3 The direction and sloping of the prevalence of the ore-bearing body (bodies) (to the degree of study) - the prevalence of the productive layer is limited by the parameters of the license area.

4.4 Average strength of the ore-bearing body (bodies) - under Resolution No. 120 of June 16 of 2007 of the Georgian government, on the sand-and-gravel deposits and

83

manifestations on the rivers, with the geological data about which obtained at the state expenses and stored with LEPL National Environmental Agency, the license to treat the ore deposit is issued with the right to treat a 3-meter-high productive layer. Following the above-mentioned, the average strength of the productive layer on the license object is considered to be 3 m.

4.5 Mean deposition element of ore-bearing body (bodies) 5 Degree of study of the ore recovery object and geological-technological description

of ore deposit 5.1 Exploration works - not conducted 5.2 Testing - not conducted 5.3 Petrographic-mineralogical and granulometric description - by analogy: in a

petrographic respect, the inert material is made up of sandstones, limestones, porphyries, andesites, basalts and rarely of granitoides, quartz and silicificated rocks.

- Fraction - 0,5 mm or less (sand) - 25,9% on average - Fraction - 0,5-70 mm (gravel) or less - 50,7% on average - Fraction - 70 mm or more (blocks) - 13%.

5.4 Chemical composition - not studied 5.5 Physical-mechanical properties -

for gravel and blocks volumetric fill weight - 1756-1779 kg/m3; content of dusty and clay-like particles - 5,4-9,6%; wearing grade - ɂ – II; crushing grade Ⱦɪ-8 and Ⱦɪ-12; voids - 31,7-32,4 %; content of soft rocks - 2,1-2,3 %; content of plate grains - 2,3-3,1 %. for sand volumetric fill weight - 1510-1530 kg/m3; granularity module - 1,94-2,19 kg/m3; content of dusty and clay-like particles - 6,0-11,2%; content of #016 mm sieved grains 21,2-21,6%.

5.6 Hygienic-radiation properties - not studied 5.7 Additional data - 6 Ore deposits reserves and expected resources

6.1 Degree (stage) of exploration of the ore recovery object area - stage of exploration 6.2 Ore recovery object area within the reserves calculation contour - the area of the

license area is 3,08 ha 6.3 Major parameters of the ore-bearing body - the area of the license area is 30800 m2;

and its strength is 3.0 m. 6.4 Reserves calculation method - mean arithmetic 6.5 Quantitative indicators of ore deposit according to the categories of reserves and

expected resources (A+B+C1+C2 and P) - the expected sand-and-gravel reserves of category P on the license object are: 30800 x 3,0 = 92400 m3.

6.6 Reserves stability (degree of filling the generated area with material in case of inert material) - the reserves are hypothetical, non-stable and the degree of filling is unknown.

84

6.7 Reserves of accompanying useful component - not fixed 6.8 Field of use of ore deposits - construction works 7 Terms of processing of the ore recovery object

7.1 Hydrogeological and mining-and-technical terms of treatment of the ore recovery object - favorable

7.2 Method of the ore recovery object processing - quarrying. The environmental balance and safety on the object is guaranteed by the licensee.

7.3 Topography of the ore recovery object - a topographic plan of the object is to be drafted by the moment of generation

8

Establishing the impact of ore deposit extraction in the coastal zones - the license site is located on the left terrace of the river floodplain. Aiming at maintaining the stability of the river banks, we propose an alternative with the following coordinates:

No. X Y 1 494457 4608661 2 494546 4608690 3 494665 4608430 4 494554 4608385

S=3,08 ha WGS 1984

8.1 The location of the ore recovery object relative to the zone of strict supervision of the engineering coastal protection - is not located

8.2 The location of the ore recovery object relative to the zone of permanent supervision of the engineering coastal protection - is located

8.3 Geodynamic state in the ore extraction area: (bank erosion; excess accumulation originated in the bed) - excess accumulation

8.4 Morphological and morphometric changes (erosion, excess accumulation) of banks caused by extracting inert material - no changes will occur

8.5 Possible negative hydrological phenomena caused by the morphological changes of the banks: washing out and/or flooding of urban, industrial or agrarian areas, their spatial extension parameters - as a result of material extraction, the major part of the river current will start flowing along the left side of the bed thus alleviating the state of the right wrecking bank of the river.

8.6 Engineering solution (proposal) to avoid the damage caused by natural disaster - no need

8.7 Conclusions and recommendations - extracting the material with the new coordinates will improve the stability of the right river bank

9 Fund and printing material used to prepare the information 9.1 Author(s) of the geological report (or book): Pantskhava V. 9.2 Place (publishing house) and year of the report drafting (publishing) - 1987 9.3 Report fund inventory No. - fund no. 17272 10 Graphical material from the indicated information source (as required by the

licensee) 10.1 A schematic geological map of the ore recovery object - 10.2 Plan of reserves calculation - 10.3 Chief section of the ore recovery object -

85

License No. 100723


Position Information question list 1 Ore recovery object - The river Mtkvari sand and gravel manifestation 2 Location of the ore recovery object and general description of the area

2.1 Region - Tbilisi 2.2 Administrative district - Isani-Samgori 2.3 The nearest settled area - Adjacent to Ponichala 2.4 Distance from an important point - 11-12 km north-west of the city of Rustavi and 1-

1,5 km south-east of Polichala 2.5 Distance from the nearest road axis - 1280-1500 m east (the nearest distance) 2.6 Distance from the state border and coastline - 33-34 km north-west of the state border

(the nearest distance) 2.7 Distance from the nearest bridge - 2,6-3,0 km south-east (the nearest distance) 2.8 River basin and mountain system - the river Mtkvari basin 2.9 Nomenclature of the ore recovery object Ʉ-38-90-Ȼ-ɛ and linear coordinates - the


No. X Y I area

1 493369 4611107 2 493357 4611178 3 493398 4611195 4 493428 4611225 5 493447 46112656 493450 46112187 493495 46112098 493545 46112459 493527 4611182

10 493462 461114711 493453 461116712 493423 4611137

S=1,15 ha II area

1 493550 4611247 2 493746 4611259 3 493762 4611187

S=0,72 ha WGS 1984

2.10 Absolute height of the ore recovery object from sea level 350-353 m. 2.11 Climatic conditions - Continental. 2.12 Traditional industrial branches - agriculture 2.13 Drinking and technical water - drinking water is supplied from the city water-supply

system and the technical water is supplied from the river Mtkvari.

86

3 Forest resources 3.1 Resort zone forest - not fixed 3.2 Green zone forest - not fixed 3.3 State protection forest zone - not fixed 3.4 Floodplain forest - not fixed 3.5 A 300-m-wide forest area adjacent to the subalpine zone - not fixed 3.6 Up to 100-ha forest area between deforested areas - not fixed 3.7 Category of the protected areas of the state forest fund - not fixed 3.8 Up to 200-m-wide forest band along the permanent beds of snow avalanches or

mudflows - not fixed 3.9 A forest area with dominating Red-listed woody plants, as well forest areas with

special economic designation (forest seed production, honey-producing plant growing, etc.) - not fixed

3.10 Forest area in 1 km radius of holiday inns, boarding houses or medicinal establishments or mineral springs (the distance is limited to a watershed) - not fixed

3.11 Up to 300-m-wide coast-protection forest area along the rivers, lakes, water reservoirs and water channels (beds) - not fixed

3.12 Up to 100-m-wide forest band near the escarps, landslid sites, taluses, karst formations and mountain mother rocks outcropping areas on the ground - not fixed

3.13 Up to 100-m-wide forest band along the railways and motor roads (from their subgrades) - not fixed

3.14 The territory where the forest exploitation is envisaged for recreational purposes - not fixed

3.15 Slopes with over 20º inclination - not fixed 3.16 State forest fund area with over 50 m3 woody resources per ha - not fixed 3.17 State forest fund area with the unconvertible natural forest regeneration process -

not fixed 3.18 State forest fund area with over 50% of its area covered with bushes - not fixed 3.19 State forest fund area with the special timber producing license or special hunting

industry license or forest exploitation general license issued - not fixed 3.20 Regional forest department - not fixed 3.21 Forest station (a former forest unit), ranger’s unit number - not fixed 3.22 Quarter(s) No. - not fixed 3.23 Liter(s) No. - not fixed 3.24 Total area of liter(s) - not fixed 3.25 areas covered with forest among them (ha) - not fixed 3.26 areas not covered with forest among them (ha) - not fixed 3.27 Dominant species - not fixed 3.28 Volume and species of erected trees and forest on the sample area - not fixed 3.29 Additional data about forest resources

4 Geological position of the ore recovery object 4.1 Geology of the ore-bearing area - folded system of the Lesser Caucasioni; Aspindza-

Tbilisi sector of the southern sub-zone of Ajara-Trialeti zone. The geological description of manifestation is given similar to the near Lochino II sand-and-gravel deposit manifestation.

87

The site is built with the sandy and clay deposits of Paleogenic system (Eocene section), gypsum clays of Neogene system (Pliocene section) and alluvial deposits of the Quaternary system.

4.2 Ore-bearing capacity - both sites of the license objects are located on the over-floodplain terrace of the river Mtkvari. The useful layer on the territory of the license object is presented by the alluvial deposits of the floodplain and I over-floodplain terraces of the river Mtkvari, in particular, sand, gravel and blocks. The sand comes with different granularity and is of a grey or yellowish grey color. The gravel and blocks are well-processed and come in different shapes. In a petrographic respect, the material is presented by fractions of sedimentary (sandstones, limestones) and volcanogenic rocks (porphyries, andesites, basalts, quartz and silicificated rocks).


4.4 Average strength of the ore-bearing body (bodies) - under Resolution No. 120 of June 16 of 2007 of the Georgian government, on the sand-and-gravel deposits and manifestations on the rivers, with the geological data about which obtained at the state expenses and stored with LEPL National Environmental Agency, the license to treat the ore deposit is issued with the right to treat a 3-meter-high productive layer. Following the above-mentioned, the average strength of the productive layer on the license object is considered to be 3 m.

4.5 Mean deposition element of ore-bearing body (bodies) 5 Degree of study of the ore recovery object and geological-technological description

of ore deposit 5.1 Exploration works - not conducted 5.2 Testing - not conducted 5.3 Petrographic-mineralogical and granulometric description - by analogy of Lochino

II mine: in a petrographic respect, the material is presented by fractions of sedimentary (sandstones, limestones) and volcanogenic rocks (porphyries, andesites, basalts, quartz and silicificated rocks).

- Fraction - 70 mm or more (blocks) - 13,0%. - Fraction - 5-70 mm (gravel) - 50,7%; - Fraction of 5 mm or less (sand) - 25.9%.

5.4 Chemical composition - not studied 5.5 Physical-mechanical properties - the physical-mechanical properties are given by

analogy: volumetric weight of the gravel and blocks fill - 1756-1779 kg/m3; content of dusty and clay-like particles - 5,4-9,6%; crushing grade Ⱦɪ-8 and Ⱦɪ-12; voids - 31,7-32,4 %; content of soft rocks - 2,1-2,3 %; content of plate grains - 2,3-3,1 %. volumetric weight of fill sand - 1510-1530 kg/m3; granularity module - 1,94-2,19 kg/m3; organic admixtures - no;

88

content of dust and clay - 6,0-11,2%; content of #016 mm sieved grains 21,2-21,6%.

5.6 Hygienic-radiation properties - not studied 5.7 Additional data - 6 Ore deposits reserves and expected resources

6.1 Degree (stage) of exploration of the ore recovery object area - stage of exploration 6.2 Ore recovery object area within the reserves calculation contour - the area of the

license area is 1,15 ha for the I area and it is 0,72 ha for the II area. 6.3 Major parameters of the ore-bearing body - the area of the I area is 11500 m2 and it is

7200 m2 for the II area; the average strength is 3.0 m. 6.4 Reserves calculation method - mean arithmetic 6.5 Quantitative indicators of ore deposit according to the categories of reserves and

expected resources (A+B+C1+C2 and P) - the expected reserves of category P on the object are: 11500 x 3 = 34500 m3 for the I area 7200 x 3 = 21600 m3 for the II area Total of 34500 + 21600 = 56100 m3.

6.6 Reserves stability (degree of filling the generated area with material in case of inert material) - the reserves are hypothetical.

6.7 Reserves of accompanying useful component - not fixed 6.8 Field of use of ore deposits - construction works 7 Terms of processing of the ore recovery object

7.1 Hydrogeological and mining-and-technical terms of treatment of the ore recovery object - favorable


7.3 Topography of the ore recovery object - a topographic plan of the object is to be drafted by the moment of generation

8 Establishing the impact of ore deposit extraction in the coastal zones8.1 The location of the ore recovery object relative to the zone of strict supervision of

the engineering coastal protection - is not located 8.2 The location of the ore recovery object relative to the zone of permanent

supervision of the engineering coastal protection - is located 8.3 Morphological and morphometric changes (erosion, excess accumulation) of banks

caused by extracting inert material - no changes will occur 8.4 Possible negative hydrological phenomena caused by the morphological changes of

the banks (overflow of the water currents from the floodplain-beds) - not expected 8.5 Washing out and/or flooding of urban, industrial or agrarian areas, their spatial

prevalence parameters - will not be caused 8.6 Engineering solution (proposal) to avoid the damage caused by natural disaster - no

need 8.7 Conclusions and recommendations - extracting the material is admissible. The issue is

to be agreed with the LEPL Tbilisi Architectural Department. 9 Fund and printing material used to prepare the information

9.1 Author(s) of the geological report (or book): Pantskhava V.

89

9.2 Place (publishing house) and year of the report drafting (publishing) - 1987 9.3 Report fund inventory No. - Inventory No. 1. No. 17272 10 Graphical material from the indicated information source (as required by the

licensee) 10.1 A schematic geological map of the ore recovery object - 10.2 Plan of reserves calculation - 10.3 Chief section of the ore recovery object -

90

License No. 1000219


Position Information question list 1 Location of the ore recovery object and general description of the area - sand-and-

gravel manifestation of village Akhuti 2 Location of the ore recovery object and general description of the area

2.1 Region - Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti 2.2 Administrative district - Chkhorotsku 2.3 The nearest settled area - village Akhuti 2.4 Distance from an important point - 5-6 km north-east of the regional center

Chkhorotsku and 500-600 m west of village Akhuti 2.5 Distance from the nearest road axis - over 100 m 2.6 Distance from the state border and coastline - over 20 km 2.7 Distance from the nearest bridge - 250-260 m southwards 2.8 River basin and mountain system - the river Otskarie 2.9 Nomenclature of the ore recovery object Ʉ-38-90-V-v and linear coordinates - the


No. X Y 1 265527 470536 2 265536 4705343 3 265526 4705322 4 265510 4705312 5 265488 4705310 6 265471 4705320 7 265460 4705336 8 265485 4705335 9 265503 4705342

S=0,20 ha WGS 1984

2.10 Absolute height of the ore recovery object from sea level 160-165 m. 2.11 Climatic conditions - humid, with the average annual temperature of 14-16ºC and

average annual precipitations of 1500-3000 mm. 2.12 Traditional industrial branches - agriculture 2.13 Drinking and technical water - drinking water is supplied from the near springs and the

technical water is supplied from the river Otskarie. 3 Forest resources

3.1 Regional forest department - not fixed 3.2 Category of the protected areas of the state forest fund - not fixed 3.3 Area with special functional designation - not fixed 3.4 State protection forest zone - not fixed 3.5 A forest area with Red-listed woody plants - not fixed

91

3.6 Slopes with over 20º inclination - not fixed 3.7 State forest fund area with over 50 m3 woody resources per ha - not fixed 3.8 Forest station (a former forest unit), ranger’s unit number - not fixed 3.9 Quarter(s) No. - not fixed 3.10 Liter(s) No. - not fixed 3.11 Total area of liter(s) - not fixed 3.12 areas covered with forest (ha) - not fixed 3.13 areas not covered with forest (ha) - not fixed 3.14 Dominant species - not fixed 3.15 Volume and species of erected trees and forest on the sample area - not fixed 3.16 State forest fund area with the special timber producing license or special hunting

industry license or forest exploitation general license issued - no information is available

3.17 Additional data about forest resources4 Geological position of the ore recovery object

4.1 Geology of the ore-bearing area - intermontane area of Trans-Caucasus; Odishi block of western molassa subsidence.

4.2 Ore-bearing capacity - the geology of the manifestation is characterized by the analogy of Chkhorotsku sand-gravel ore deposit. The license object is located in the floodplain-bed of the river Otskarie. The inert material is represented by well-processed sand, gravel and blocks of different shapes.


4.4 Average strength of the ore-bearing body (bodies) - under Resolution No. 120 of June 16 of 2007 of the Georgian government, on the sand-and-gravel deposits and manifestations on the rivers, with the geological data about which obtained at the state expenses and stored with LEPL National Environmental Agency, the license to treat the ore deposit is issued with the right to treat a 3-meter-high productive layer. Following the above-mentioned, the average strength of the productive layer on the license object is considered to be 3 m.

4.5 Mean deposition element of ore-bearing body (bodies) - not defined 5 Degree of study of the ore recovery object and geological-technological description

of ore deposit 5.1 Exploration works - not conducted 5.2 Testing - not conducted 5.3 Petrographic-mineralogical and granulometric description - by analogy: in a

petrographic respect, the material is represented by sandstones, porphyries,tufa-breccias, tufa-conglomerates, andesites, basalts, etc.

5.4 Chemical composition - not determined 5.5 Physical-mechanical properties - not determined 5.6 Hygienic-radiation properties - not determined 5.7 Additional data - 6 Ore deposits reserves and expected resources

6.1 Degree (stage) of exploration of the ore recovery object area - stage of exploration

92

6.2 Ore recovery object area within the reserves calculation contour - the area of the license area is 0,2 ha

6.3 Major parameters of the ore-bearing body - the strength of the productive layer is 3,0 m and the area of the license object is 0,2 ha.

6.4 Reserves calculation method - mean arithmetic 6.5 Quantitative indicators of ore deposit according to the categories of reserves and

expected resources (A+B+C1+C2 and P) - the expected reserves of category P on the object are estimated as follows: 2000 x 3 = 6000 m3.

6.6 Reserves stability (degree of filling the generated area with material in case of inert material) - the reserves are hypothetical.

6.7 Reserves of accompanying useful component - not fixed 6.8 Field of use of ore deposits - the sand and gravel of the license object, after washing,

can be used for construction works and as concrete filler. 7 Terms of processing of the ore recovery object

7.1 Hydrogeological and mining-and-technical terms of treatment of the ore recovery object - satisfactory


7.3 Topography of the ore recovery object - a survey of the object is necessary and the object must be included in the state network.

8 Establishing the impact of ore deposit extraction in the coastal zones - the license object is located in the floodplain-bed of the river

8.1 The location of the ore recovery object relative to the zone of strict supervision of the engineering coastal protection - is located

8.2 The location of the ore recovery object relative to the zone of permanent supervision of the engineering coastal protection - is located

8.3 Geodynamic state in the ore extraction area: (bank erosion; excess accumulation in the bed) - excess accumulation

8.4 Morphological and morphometric changes (erosion, excess accumulation) of banks caused by extracting inert material - no changes will occur

8.5 Possible negative hydrological phenomena caused by the morphological changes of the banks: washing out and/or flooding of urban, industrial or agrarian areas, their spatial extension parameters - as a result of material extraction, the live section of the riverbed will increase improving the hydrological conditions.

8.6 Engineering solution (proposal) to avoid the damage caused by natural disaster - no need

8.7 Conclusions and recommendations - extracting the material in the given area is admissible

9 Fund and printing material used to prepare the information 9.1 Author(s) of the geological report (or book): authors: Mikaia D. et al. 9.2 Place (publishing house) and year of the report drafting (publishing) -

“Sakgeologia”, 1980 9.3 Report fund inventory No. - fund no. 15314 10 Graphical material from the indicated information source (as required by the

licensee)

93

10.1 A schematic geological map of the ore recovery object - 10.2 Plan of reserves calculation - 10.3 Chief section of the ore recovery object -

94

ANNEX 5.

Procedures for Extraction of Plant Species Included in Red List of Georgia from the Natural Environment and Procedures for Changing Category of Forestry Fund Land

Extraction of Plant Species Included in Red List of Georgia (Endangered) from the Natural Environment

The law of Georgia on the Red List of Georgia and Red Book identifies the exceptional cases, when plants included in Red List of Georgia could be extracted from the environment, namely: According to Article 24 – “Extraction of Endangered Wild Plants or their Parts (from the Natural Environment)”: Extraction of endangered wild plants or their parts (from the natural environment) is allowed only in the below exceptional cases:

a) Restoration and propagation in natural conditions (cultivation);

b) Cultivation in dendrological and botanical gardens and parks;

c) For economic purposes to cultivate in artificial conditions (only if the wild plant is

cultivated artificially);

d) For scientific purposes;

e) If the damage of the endangered wild plant or its parts is caused by entomic pests and

phyto diseases and their presence in natural environment poses the threat of spreading

entomic pests/phyto diseases and the extraction from the natural environment is the only

means against entomic pests/phyto diseases – in this case the basis of the review of the

issue of the extraction (from the natural environment) of the endangered wild plant or its

parts by the ministry of the protection of the environment of Georgia is the summary

presented to the ministry by the joint commission of public legal entity – Vasil

Gulisashvili Institute of Forestry, public legal entity – Levan Kanchaveli Institute of Plant

Protection and public legal entity – Tbilisi Botanical Garden and Botanical Institute. Upon

the discussion of the summary the ministry is entitled to decide on the extraction of

plants from the natural environment;

f) During the construction of object and infrastructure of special state significance – during

the mentioned activities plant species included in the Red List are extracted from the

natural environment only if the ministry of the protection of the environment of Georgia

decides to extract plant species included in the Red List from the natural environment.

The ministry of the protection of the environment could be appealed to make the above

decision by ministry determined by the law of Georgia on “the Structure, Incumbency

and Rule of Conduct of the Government of Georgia”.

Change of Category of Forestry Land

The rule and procedures of the change of category of state forestry land are implemented according to the rule of conduct approved by the order of the minister of

95

the protection of the environment and natural resources N5 (15th February, 2010) on “the Rule of Assigning Category of Special Purpose to State Forestry Land”. The above mentioned rule regulates the issues of use of forests for special purpose within the state forestry territory. Territory of state forestry, which is issued into special purpose-specific use, is automatically assigned the category of special purpose of the state forestry. The decision on the assignment of special forest use right within the state forestry fund as well as special tree felling was made by the ministry of the protection of the environment and natural resources upon agreement with other interested agencies, except for the cases as stipulated by Part 3, Article 33 of the Forest Code of Georgia (on the latter the decision is made by the Government of Georgia, while this part of the Forest Code implies the following: any change, which is aimed at the decrease of the state forest fund, should be well-grounded. In case of special tree felling on slopes of 35 degree or more inclination wood processing is possible only during the construction of object of especial state significance. Wood processing on slopes of inclination from 30 to 35 degree is allowed only after special research and if forest restoration measures are introduced parallel to wood processing). However, after the reorganization of the mentioned ministry this function was assigned to the ministry of energetics and natural resources, in the structure of which forestry agency was included. As respective changes on separation of incumbency have not yet been implemented in the legislation of Georgia, the below mentioned “ministry” and agency responsible for this specific issues presumably imply the ministry of energetics and natural resources. Forest use with special purpose is implemented for the below purposes:

a) Construction, reconstruction (rehabilitation) or uninstallation of hydro systems, pipelines,

roads, communications and power communications, channels;

b) During the implementation of anti-fire measures and elimination of results of flood and

other extreme situations;

c) If a threat of restriction of functioning or damage to any infrastructure or its separate

elements exists;

d) During fossil use;

e) During the reconstruction (rehabilitation) of monument of cultural heritage.

An entity interested in special forest use applies to the appropriate ministry. This ministry sends the application and supplemented documents to the bodies with the right of state forestry management for approval. In case of positive response the ministry sends the full documentation (in cases of activity determined by Sub-Paragraphs “a”, “d” and “e” indicated above) to the ministry of economics and sustainable development of Georgia and ministry of culture and protection of monuments of Georgia for approval and if positive response is given by these ministries, it starts the procedure of the review of the application and relative documentation. Only in cases stipulated by Sub-Paragraphs “b” and “c” the decision is based upon the proposal of the body with the right of state forestry management. For the assignment of right of special forestry use within the state forestry the application should: in case of activities as stipulated by Sub-Paragraphs “a”, “d” and “e” comply with the requirements identified by Article 78 of the General Administrative Code of Georgia. It should also contain the list of supplemented documents:

1. The motivation of the necessity of special forestry use, its goal and term;

96

2. For private legal entities and individual entrepreneurs – statement from the register of

entrepreneurs and non-profit (non-commercial) legal entities, for physical persons – copy

of the personal ID card of Georgian citizen or passport, for public legal entity –

authenticated copy of founding documents;

3. Precise measuring drawing of the area selected for special forestry use in UTM

coordinate system. The drawing should be authenticated by the executor of the

measuring drawing;

4. Copy of the document (if applicable), according to which and proceeding from the

determined activity, the implementation of special forestry use is necessary or/and

needed;

5. Rationale of the necessity of tree felling;

6. Information on the presence of the species protected by the Red List within the selected

area.

In case of the activity identified by above given Sub-Paragraphs “b” and “c” the proposal of the body with forestry management right should be supplemented with the below:

1. Rationale of the necessity of the special forestry use;

2. Rationale of the necessity of tree felling;

3. Information on the presence of the species protected by the Red List within the selected

area.

In case of the activity determined by Sub-Paragraph “c” additional information on the number of trees to be felled according to species should be provided, in case of the activity determined by Sub-Paragraph “d” – copy of license of fossil extraction, in case of the activity determined by Sub-Paragraph “e” – consent of the ministry of culture and protection of monuments. In case of decision on special forestry use within the state forestry respective individual administrative-legal act of the minister is issued. On the bases of this act the body with the right of state forestry management signs special forestry use agreement with the stakeholder (except for cases identified by Sub-Paragraphs “b” and “d”) and delivers the territory selected for special forestry use with the act of delivery-acceptance. In case of the expiry of the term of the agreement (or termination) the forest user returns the territory selected for special forestry use to the incumbent body with the act of delivery-acceptance. If wood processing is required during special forestry use, the trees to be felled are marked by the stakeholder and assigned by the body with the right of forestry management. In cases stipulated by Sub-Paragraphs “b” and “c” and after the issuing of the above mentioned act the body with the right of forestry management implements the special forestry use and records the felled arborescent resources and passes them to the public legal entity of the ministry – forestry agency for further realization purpose and with the act of delivery-acceptance. If the special forestry user is the public legal entity of the ministry – forestry agency, it records the felled arborescent resource and implements its realization according to the rules as stipulated by the legislation.

97

Exclusion of Land from Forestry Exclusion of land from forestry is conducted according to the resolution of the Government of Georgia (13th August, 2010) N240 on “the rule of identification of the state forestry boundary”. The aim of the rule is to determine legal relationships connected with the identification of the boundaries of the state forestry and it does not spread over the legal relationships connected with the identification of borders of the protected areas of the state forestry. The borders of state forestry are set by the Government of Georgia through sub-legal normative act, which was proposed in the form of draft resolution of the identification of borders of state forestry by the ministry of the protection of the environment and natural resources of Georgia. However, after the reorganization of the mentioned ministry this function was assigned to the ministry of energetics and natural resources, in the structure of which forestry agency was included. As respective changes on separation of incumbency have not yet been implemented in the legislation of Georgia, the below mentioned “ministry” and agency responsible for this specific issues presumably imply the ministry of energetics and natural resources. The below are entitled to raise the issue of the increase or decrease of the state forestry before the mentioned ministry:

a) Ministries identified by the law of Georgia on “the Structure, Incumbency and Rule of

Conduct of the Government of Georgia”;

b) Government of the Autonomous Republics;

c) Tbilisi City Hall;

d) State assignee – Governor;

e) As well as the ministry based upon its own initiative.

The appeal should indicate the need (necessity) of increase or decrease of the state forestry, purpose and supplemented with cadaster measuring drawing (with digital version) of the respective area. The ministry submits the presented documentation, according to the rule determined by the General Administrative Code of Georgia, for approval to the below agencies:

a) Ministry of economics and sustainable development of Georgia;

b) Ministry of culture and protection of monuments of Georgia;

c) If needed, to other interested administrative body.

After the receipt of consent from the above mentioned administrative bodies the ministry submits the prepared material to the Government of Georgia for decision making. With the aim of precise identification of the contour of the new border of the state forestry the state body of forestry management facilitates:

a) Study of the existing information on the state forestry (plan-cartographic and cadaster

material, land use plans, existing material of inventory (or forestry arrangement),

topographic maps and other documentation which could be used for project

preparation);

b) Request and study of the information related to the border of the adjacent owner (among

these – information in Public Register);

c) Determination or/and specification of the border contour of the territory (line) based upon

respective material;

d) Preparation of all the documentation required for the registration of state forestry in

Public Register.

98

The ministry submits the mentioned documentation to the Government of Georgia for decision making. After the decision on the identification of border of state forestry is made by the Government of Georgia the ministry submits the corresponding documentation to public legal entity – National Agency of Public Register of the ministry of justice of Georgia for registration purpose in the Public Register. In addition, the ministry is entitled to appeal to the Government of Georgia on identification of borders of separate areas within the state forestry with the purpose of their further registration in the Public Register. The border line of the state forestry (contour) should be determined via respective technologies (geo-informational system) and on the basis of ortho-photo-plan and other evidence (in state coordinate system – WGS-84/UTM).

99

ANNEX 6.

Waste Management Plan for Construction Camps and Equipment Yards

General Provisions The below plan comprises all kinds of activities, which result in waste production, among these:

x Activities in normal exploitation conditions;

x Activities in abnormal exploitation conditions (i.e. during repair-construction works);

x Activities in case of emergency.

Goals and Objectives of the Plan The below waste management plan sets the rules of collection, transporting, allocation, treatment and disposal of different waste in accordance with the provisions of the environmental norms and rules. Systemic method is used in the process of waste management, namely, it comprises the following key principles:

x Timely measures to avoid waste;

x If possible, facilitation of waste treatment;

x The destruction of waste is the last option.

The waste management is conducted according to the below principles: x Hierarchy principle in waste management;

x Proximity principle;

x Care commitment;

x Use of BATNEEC principles (the best known technique so far, which is not connected

with excessive expenses);

x “The polluter pays” principle.

All of the above principles are discussed below. Hierarchy Principle in Waste Management Hierarchy principle in waste management illustrated in the below scheme implies the prioritization of various activities during waste management in terms of optimization. Generally the best option is the prevention of waste, followed by the minimization of the amount and threat. In addition, it is accepted that re-use, restoration and recycling of waste is better and destruction is the last option. Each waste flow should be processed according to the hierarchy. The selected technique should be the best in terms of threat and practicality.

100

Hierarchy in Waste Management Proximity Principle Proximity principle implies waste management be undertaken as near to the source of production as possible. Care Commitment The implementation of the “care commitment” program is facilitated for all types of waste. The principle of “care commitment” implies that the person who produced or owns the waste is obliged to facilitate due management of the waste even after the waste is passed to the third party. Care commitment system categorizes and sets the amount and character of the waste from “cradle to the grave” (i.e. from the production till the processing and final destruction including transportation). The focus of the principle is on the fact that waste producer should select third party to whom the waste shall be passed with due diligence, evaluate the party’s capacity and control the party’s activities in terms of waste management. Care commitment requirements are as follows:

x Waste, which is passed to the contractor or carrier for destruction, should have detailed

written information on how the waste should be safely transported, processed and

destroyed;

x The waste should be passed only to the permitted persons, i.e. registered waste carriers,

licensed contractors, waste collectors of the local authorities or persons freed from the

licensing obligation;

x Waste should be packaged as necessary, so that it will not spill or leak in the

environment;

x All appropriate measures should be introduced, so that all persons who transport or

destroy waste follow the requirements of law.

Prevention

Minimization

Extraction of material, recycling, re-use

Processing

Destruction (Controlled)

Optimality

101

BATNEEC (the best known technique so far, which is not connected with excessive expenses) principle implies waste management be implemented using the best known technique, which is not connected with excessive expenses. “The Polluter Pays” Principle The principle implies that the person who causes the contamination of the environment should indemnify the expenses necessary to eliminate the results of the pollution. The Main Goals of Waste management Process:

x Facilitation of the waste identification according to its categories and threats;

x Facilitation of the segregated collection of waste, compliance with the conditions of the

temporary disposal to exclude the impact of the waste on the environment and human

health;

x Facilitation of the transportation conditions of waste, which should exclude the emission

or loss of waste as well as probability of accidents, damage to the environment and

human health;

x The use of methods safe to the environment and human health during the treatment,

processing or disposal of waste;

x Minimization of the amount of waste;

x Re-use of waste;

x Identification of personal responsibility for waste management;

x Facilitation of the records on industrial and household waste.

The implementation of the instructions given in the plan is compulsory to all employees. General Requirements of Safe Waste Handling:

1. The staff involved in waste management (collection, storage, transportation,

delivery/receipt) should be trained in occupational health care and safety issues;

2. The staff should be facilitated with special clothes, shoes and individual protection

equipment. If required the staff clothes should be specially processed – especially after

operations related to the hazardous waste;

3. The staff should be able to provide first aid in case of poisoning or trauma during waste

related activities;

4. The people who have not undergone appropriate training, have no special clothes or

have signs of sickness should not be allowed to work;

5. Allocation of waste exceeding the set norm in the area of waste collection is not allowed.

Allocation of waste near spark or warmth sources is not allowed;

6. In case of allocation of different types of waste their compatibility should be considered;

7. Storage of external items, personal clothes, special clothes, individual protection

equipment is not allowed in the areas of industrial waste collection. Eating in such areas

is strictly prohibited;

8. Rules of personal hygiene should be strictly followed when working with industrial waste.

Before eating and after completion of work hands should be washed with soap and

warm water;

102

9. In case of poisoning signs the work should be terminated and the affected person should

address the nearest medical point and inform the management of the structural unit;

10. The areas of collection of flammable waste should be facilitated with firefighting

equipment. Smoking and use of open fire is strictly banned in the areas of allocation of

such waste;

11. The staff should know the waste characteristics and firefighting rules. The fire

extinguishing of burning flammable or fuel liquids is possible with fire extinguishers, sand

or asbestos clothes;

12. Fire extinguishing of burning solvents with water is not allowed.

Responsibility for the Implementation of Measures Determined by the Plan

1. Plant management is responsible for the following: x Approval of waste inventory charter;

x Facilitation with the equipment, resources and inventory required for waste

management;

x Protection of the environmental legislation of Georgia in the process of the

management of waste produced as a result of the plant activities.

2. Plant staff, who is involved in the waste management field, is responsible for the following:

x Non-fulfillment of waste collection, storage, transportation and other conditions as

stipulated by the waste management plan;

x Allocation of waste in non-sanctioned places;

x Violation of norms, rules and records on waste production, processing, use and

disposal;

x Delivery of incomplete incorrect documentation (information) on waste

management or refusal to deliver such information;

x Delivery of waste without duly formalized documentation;

x Non-fulfillment of the requirements of the waste management plan by the

subordinate staff.

Procedures and Rules of Waste Management This section describes the measures and rules, which should be met (prior to processing and/or destruction) for waste management purposes. Management measures are reviewed according to the below priorities. Waste Classification Further management of waste significantly depends on the classification of waste at the place of production. Segregation of waste by waste types, meeting the storage requirements and processing/destruction – all of the above requires appropriate classification of waste. Waste categories should be identified, samples taken, checked, tested or analyzed in laboratory with the aim to facilitate the classification of waste according to EU standards and determine the below issues:

x Which category the waste belongs to – hazardous, non- hazardous or inert;

103

x How waste management should be implemented.

Person responsible for waste management should facilitate the below for waste classification:

x Use temporary inventory of waste, which should describe wide array of expected types

of waste;

x If the specific type of waste is not included in the inventory, use other additional

methodology to classify waste;

x If the general methodology of waste classification is not complete, waste samples should

be taken and checked in laboratory to facilitate the classification of waste by the below

table.

Provisions for Waste Classification Waste Classification

Provisions

Inert According to provisions of article 2 of EU directive 1999/31/EEC, inert waste is the waste which is not subject to significant physical, chemical or biological changes. Inert waste is not resolved, burn or show any other physical or chemical reaction; it does not decompose and negatively impact other matter, with which it interacts; it does not cause the pollution of the environment and damage human health. The contamination effect and eco-toxicity of such waste should be insignificant and will not pose threat to the surface and/or ground water quality.

Hazardous Hazardous waste is the waste determined by article 1(4) of 91/689 directive and has the following potential characteristics: explosiveness, acidity, high degree of flammability or flammability, irritation causing, toxicity, carcinogenicity, corrosiveness, infectiousness, teratogenesis, mutagenicity; emits very toxic or toxic gases as a result of contact with air, water or acid; substances which could create other substances and eco-toxic substances as a result of destruction.

Non-hazardous Waste which does not meet the above described provisions. Waste water Fresh water which was polluted as a result of project activities. Inventory After the classification of waste, which should determine the potential threat of the waste, the person responsible for waste management shall develop the inventory list comprising the below information:

x Waste flows and sources;

x Description and classification of waste flows, i.e. if the specific waste is hazardous or

not;

x Storage rules, if applicable;

x Destruction methods and contractors;

x Quantitative characteristics of waste – annual, quarterly or monthly, whichever

necessary.

104

Inventory records during annual or other changes are handled by the persons responsible for waste management. The copies of the waste inventory lists are delivered to the plant management. The records are updated only but those persons who have undergone special training in the issue of the use of waste inventory list. Correct inventory of waste is necessary for the identification of the below issues:

x How the waste should be processed (if applicable);

x How the waste should be handled (i.e. need for personal protection equipment and like);

x How the waste should be stored (if applicable);

x Rule of final processing/destruction.

The aim of the inventory and further measures, among them – labeling, is to provide for the sufficient information and consequently safe final destruction of waste. Waste Segregation and Collection Special containers should be placed in the proximity of the waste producing unit. Waste should be segregated and allocated in the appropriate container at the waste producing unit. As a result of the activities at different units waste, which is the subject to registration, collection, temporary storage, carriage, treatment, processing or disposal, is produced and collected. The method of separated collection of industrial and household waste according to waste categories and threat should be organized and introduced at the object. The below is the subject to segregated collection and storage:

x Household waste;

x Industrial waste, the carriage of which is not banned on the household grounds (i.e.

rubberized asbestos, rubber, plastic household items, wooden and paper waste, wood

and sawdust waste, polyethylene pipes, sandpaper waste, etc.);

x Quicksilver containing substances and material;

x Lead containing waste;

x Chemical waste;

x Oily clothes, used respirator filters;

x Oil waste, among these – precipitator waste;

x Used industrial oils, lubricants;

x Material used during the liquidation of oil spills;

x Contaminated soil and sand;

x Metal scraps, welding electrode waste;

x Used rubber hoses, used tires;

x Used lead accumulator waste;

x Paint and paint barrel waste;

x Medical waste.

Labeling Persons responsible for waste management are obliged to provide for marking of the waste containers in a way that the contents should be identified and described in detail. The above is necessary for the external staff to follow the safety rules of waste

105

handling. Waste the type of which is not indicated shall be deemed hazardous and become the subject to the above described classification. Appropriate labels should be applied to all containers (mugs, wheel boxes, barrels, etc.) so that it is clear which type of waste could be placed in the container. To avoid misunderstanding old labels should be removed. Information and Warning Signs

Smoking is banned

Subject to processing

For household waste

Flammable

Fig. 7.1

Explosive

substances or material

Toxic gas or

substance

Easily flammable gas and liquid

Easily flammable

solid substance

Other hazardous substances and material

Spontaneously igniting substance

Non-toxic gas

Hazardous if

affected by water

Infection threat

Oxidant

Corrosive substance

Radioactive substance

106

Waste Storage The waste should remain on place for minimal period of time and removed as soon as possible for further treatment and destruction. Waste storage places should be put on the corresponding plan of the object. The waste should be stored in such conditions to avoid the below:

x Accidental leak or spill, surface or ground water contamination, breaking of container

due to accidental crash, contact with the air due to utilization of secondary packaging

and/or covers;

x Corrosion or depreciation of containers both due to the environment (through provision

of shelter) and the waste itself; to provide the above mentioned containers should be

proof to the specific waste which should be placed in it, i.e. automobile accumulators

should be placed on plastic plates which are corrosion proof;

x Theft due to un-protected allocation of waste within the protected perimeter of the object.

Waste containers should correspond to the waste to be stored, its form, structure and threat. Only containers in good state of repair should be used. Covers should close or other type of covers used. Containers which react to the contents or could result in the leak of the dangerous substance should not be used. All hazardous waste should be strictly segregated from the other types of waste. Only one type of hazardous waste could be placed in a container. Solid and liquid waste should not mix. The long term collection and storage of waste within the plant is allowed as temporary measure only if:

x Waste is used in the further technological cycle with their full utilization purpose;

x The user does not exist; etc.

Proceeding from the toxic and physical-chemical characteristics of waste and its components temporary storage is allowed in:

x Industrial or auxiliary storages (storage, store-room);

x Temporary non-stationary warehouse;

x Open areas.

The areas of temporary waste storage within the object are identified during the waste inventory process and should comply with the below requirements:

x The ground cover should be solid (concrete, asphalt-concrete or concrete tiles);

x The ground should be fenced and facilitated with ricks to avoid the spill of the harmful

substances in rain sewerage or soil;

x The ground should be facilitated with comfortable access for auto-transport;

x The waste should be effectively protected against the impact of precipitations and wind

(stalls, packaging, allocation of waste in containers, etc.).

During the temporary storage of waste in non-stationary warehouses and grounds the following conditions should be met: the possibility of waste disposal into the waste water or soil should be eliminated.

107

Hazardous waste could be stored in stationary warehouse. For this purpose a special warehouse area should be facilitated within the object. The area should be arranged according to the environmental requirements, namely:

x The floor and walls should be covered with ceramic tiles;

x The ceiling should be painted with moisture proof paint;

x The area should be equipped with the below:

9 Exhaust ventilation system;

9 Sink and tap for watering-washing of the area;

9 Water intake drain;

x Iron lattices should be installed on the doors and windows;

x Racks and shelves should be installed for waste allocation;

x Waste could be allocated only in hermetic packaging, which should have appropriate

labels.

Removal of hazardous waste from the plant and further management should be undertaken by organization with appropriate permit on this type of activity. Waste Passing Rule Passing of waste should be formalized through filling in the waste pass form. In each case the below information should be entered:

x Date and time of delivery;

x Description of waste with reference to amount;

x Information on waste producer;

x Information on waste carrier;

x Information on waste recipient;

x Signatures of the representatives of the producer, carrier and recipient.

The filled in form of waste pass should be present along with the carriage overheads from the waste production area or object to the designated place of destruction, that is treatment device of waste waters, landfill, etc. Each form of waste pass should comprise the full description of waste, structure, production process, packaging, total amount of the passed waste and other relevant information. Waste pass form should be filled in three copies. The formal procedure of waste pass is as follows:

x Waste pass form is signed by incumbent persons and sub-contractor, who conducts

waste removal and carriage;

x The upper copy (first copy) stays at the object and is stored in the archive;

x The below two copies follow the waste till the place of processing, treatment or disposal;

x The carrier is obliged to make the responsible person sign the form at the waste

recipient object. It should be indicated that the waste was received in the place of

designation;

108

x After the above procedure the second copy is left at the recipient object;

x The carrier keeps the third copy in the office. Upon the next removal date the carrier

should deliver the mentioned third copy to the area of waste production;

x The third copy stays at the waste production area and is stored along with the first copy;

x The photo copy of the third copy is made at the area of waste production. The photo

copy is sent to the environmental division within the fulfillment of reporting obligations.

The filled forms of waste pass are stored throughout the entire validity term of the contract. The responsible person is obliged not to issue and sign the waste pass form, if he/she has sound suspicion that the waste has not reached the designated area in accordance with the applicable rules.

109

Was

te p

ass

Form

Tabl

e 8.

1

#

Info

rma

tion

on

wast

e p

rodu

cer

Info

rma

tion

on

wast

e c

arr

ier

Info

rma

tion

on

w

ast

e

reci

pie

nt

Wast

e c

om

posi

tion

R

ule

/pla

ce

of

pro

du

ctio

n

#

T

ype

of w

ast

e

Am

ount

of

wast

e

Th

e

pe

riod

o

f w

ast

e

colle

ctio

n

Th

e n

um

ber

an

d n

am

e o

f a

uto

mo

bile

use

d fo

r w

ast

e

transp

ort

atio

n

Drive

r’s

sig

na

ture

T

ime o

f w

ate

re

mo

val

fro

m

the

a

rea

o

f p

rodu

ctio

n

The

time

of

wast

e

rece

ptio

n

at

the

pla

ce

of

wast

e

rece

ptio

n

Th

e

wa

ste

pro

du

cer’s

sig

na

ture

Wast

e

reci

pie

nt’s

si

gna

ture

Wast

e P

roduce

r O

rganiz

atio

n

Wast

e R

eci

pie

nt

Org

aniz

atio

n

(It

is f

illed in t

hre

e c

opie

s, o

ne

sta

ys w

ith t

he w

ast

e p

roduce

r, t

he s

eco

nd b

elo

ngs

to t

he d

rive

r an

d t

he t

hird –

to t

he w

ast

e r

eci

pie

nt. A

fter

transp

ort

atio

n t

he d

rive

r re

turn

s his

/her

cop

y to

the w

ast

e p

roduce

r).

110

Waste Transportation Waste transportation should be conducted in full compliance with the sanitary, environmental and hazardous cargo carriage safety norms. All operations connected with waste loading/unloading and transportation should be maximally mechanized and hermetic. The loss and dissipation of waste should be avoided during waste transportation. During the transportation of hazardous waste to the temporary storage the accompanying person should have the appropriate document – the request of removal of hazardous waste, which should be verified by plant management. The waste carrier facilitates the transport, loading and transportation of the hazardous waste to the designated area in accordance with sanitary, environmental and safety rules. Upon the completion of the operation the vehicle should be cleaned, washed and treated. The vehicle used for waste transportation should have appropriate warning sign. Waste which is the subject to secondary processing should be removed from the plant territory by appropriate contractor company on the basis of a contract signed in advance. Household waste is collected within the plant in special containers, while removal is conducted by the municipal cleaning service on the basis of a contract and according to the determined schedule. The workers employed in the transportation (drivers and workers) should undergo appropriate training. The below main risks are connected with cargo transportation:

- Automobile accidents; - Dissipation or spill of cargo; - Inappropriate loading of a vehicle.

To avoid the above mentioned the below should be facilitated: 1. The vehicle should be systematically checked in terms of technical state of repair and

the traffic speed rules should be met; 2. The hermiticity of containers should be checked; 3. The cargo capacity of the vehicle should be considered during the loading in order to

avoid over-loading of the vehicle; 4. Liquid impermeable capacious geo-membrane should be placed on the body of the

vehicle. It should facilitate the detention of waste on the body of the vehicle in case of emergency spill.

If an accident still occurs despite the consideration of the above safety measures and the environment is contaminated, then the driver urgently contacts with the object administration, who implements the measures as stipulated by the emergency response plan and with the help of the rescue team. Monitoring of Waste Management During industrial waste collection, storage, transportation, use, treatment and disposal applicable ecological, sanitary-epidemiologic and safety norms and rules should be complied. The registration of waste production, allocation, treatment and removal is conducted in special journal. The volume of the removed or utilized waste should be confirmed documentarily. The person responsible for waste management should systematically control the below:

x The adequacy of the waste packaging; x Presence of labeling on the packaging;

111

x The state of temporary waste allocation grounds; x The amount of the collected waste and compliance with the applicable norms (visual

control); x Compliance with the procedure of the waste removal from the territory; x Fulfillment of the requirements of ecological safety and safety technique.

Indicators of Effective Waste Management As it has been already mentioned, different types of waste could be produced at the object. The applicable waste management rules should be complied to provide for appropriate waste management. The waste removal/disposal should be conducted according to the determined rule and following the applicable norms/rules of Georgia. Potential Impact x Pollution of the territory due to inappropriate waste

management Sources x Packaging;

x Other construction waste; x Waste collected during land works; x Fuel use and storage; x Repair of the equipment; x Household waste

Goal x Facilitation of timely removal of waste according to the applicable rule;

x Prevention of damage to the environment caused by wasteActivity/Control x Facilitation of compliance with appropriate legislative and

regulative requirements; x Arrangement of special place for temporary waste storage; x Throw of waste according to the applicable legislative

requirements; x Separation of hazardous and non-hazardous waste; x Transportation of the household waste to the landfill; x Re-use of waste (if applicable); x The blocking of access and movement roads should be

prevented Effectiveness Indicator

x Absence of grievances; x Absence of waste collected during waste and technical

servicing; x Absence of hazardous waste and spill traces (i.e. oil, fuel, etc.)

Monitoring x Supervision over the allocation-removal procedures of waste; x Regular monitoring of waste collection-removal; x Due registration of records; x Grievance records, if needed – response

Corrective Activities/Reporting

x Corrective measures should be implemented as soon as a problem arises or a grievance is received;

x The work managers account for every incompliance/violation of applicable norms;

x If needed, the responsible person on the working place informs the management of the cases

Responsible Person x Executor of works

112

Responsibility for Monitoring/Execution

x Plant management

Information on the Waste Produced during Object Exploitation The following categories of waste are expected during object exploitation:

x Household waste; x Office waste (paper, cartridges, bulbs, etc.); x Packaging (wood, paper, etc.); x Oil contaminated clothes, filters, absorption pillows; x Oil contaminated soil; x Polymer waste; x Medical waste.

The amount of household waste produced during plant functioning is connected with the staff number. According to the preliminary data, up to 200 people shall be employed. Following the accepted norm, 0.70 m3 of household waste is produced per employee annually. Proceeding from the above, the amount of household waste per year will be: 0.70 X 200 = 140 m3. The installation of closed containers is planned for household waste at the object. The removal of this waste and disposal at the grounds will be conducted on the basis of the contract with the municipal cleaning service. Oil contaminated mass as well as other hazardous waste shall be temporarily allocated within the plant in accordance with environmental and hygienic requirements and proceeding from the collection passed to the organization with appropriate environmental impact permit for further processing/disposal/treatment. Wooden packaging material shall be passed to the local population for further re-use. The management of waste produced at the object (classification, inventory, segregation, collection, storage, passing and transportation) and monitoring shall be conducted in accordance with the above principles, procedures and rule.

113

ANNEX 7

Protocols of Public Consultation Meetings

114

Protocol of public review of the EIA Report of construction of Tbilisi-Ponichala and Ponichala-Rustavi sections of Tbilisi-Rustavi speedway

Tbilisi March 1, 2012 On March 1, 2012, the public review of the draft EIA Report of construction of Tbilisi-Ponichala and Ponichala-Rustavi sections of Tbilisi-Rustavi speedway took place at the office of Municipal Development Fund of Georgia. The meeting was attended by the: Representatives of the Georgian Municipal Development Fund:

x Nikoloz Soselia, a specialist of the environmental protection analysis and resettlement department;

x David Baindurashvili, a specialist of the environmental protection analysis and resettlement department;

a representative of the environmental protection consultation fund “World Experience for Georgia”

x Irakli Kaviladze; a representative of the Spatial Planning and Building Policy Department of the Ministry of Economics and Sustainable Development of Georgia:

x Amiran Katsadze; as well as NGOs and consulting companies:

x Tamar Gugushvili - Aarhus Centre in Georgia; x Irine Svanidze - Association “Green Alternative” x Gia Gvilava - International Transparency Georgia x Gia Aladashvili - ‘Information Centre of Social Reforms” x Zurab Gvelesiani - International Transparency Georgia x David Khidesheli - MAMISONI LTD. x Valeri Gelashvili - ENGURI 2006 LTD. x R. Sharashenidze - VBR LTD. x Ilgar Abdulaev - AKKORD. and citizens: x Tamar Bakhurauli; x Manon Bokuchava and x Shakro Mirotadze.

The meeting was opened by the specialist of the environmental protection analysis and resettlement department Nikoloz Soselia, who informed the attendees of the aim of the meeting and presented Mr. Irakli Kaviladze, a representative of the environmental protection consultation fund “World Experience for Georgia” to the public, who informed the public about the EIA and relevant report within the limits of the Project. He noted that when drafting the EIA report, the background status of the physical and social environment of the design section of Tbilisi-Rustavi road was studied. In particular, they studied the atmospheric air quality (pollution with harmful substances, natural radiation background, noise propagation), surface water quality, biodiversity, cultural heritage, social aspects, etc.

115

By considering the works to be accomplished, the types of expected possible impact, degree of impact and needed mitigation measures were specified. The plans of environmental management and monitoring of the planned actions are drafted. At last, the reporter communicated about the conclusions developed in the EIA process, in particular:

x The Project has a significant positive social-economic impact evidenced by the guaranteed increased traffic flows (local and transit) at the expense of the road with due carrying capacity;

x The general negative effect of the Project is associated with the impact on private lands and associated property and businesses, loss of property or income along the road for the physical and legal entities. Resettlement and compensations will be accomplished in line with the World Bank rules and Georgian legislation. This question will be discussed in the Resettlement Action Plan in detail, which will be published after the relevant document is drafted. During the document drafting, the consultations with the impacted people will be organized individually and in groups.

x The implementation of the Project is not related to any particular environmental impact and is mostly related to the common factors of construction works, like dust, emissions, noise, etc. what can be mitigated by observing the building rules and taking the measures under the management plan.

x The Project is accomplished on strongly transformed urban landscapes with no protected areas, habitats of ecological value or eco-systems in the impact area. Despite this, a certain amount of trees will be felled (mostly the along-road green space plants). The possibility of damage to individual trees of any red-listed or endangered species (e.g. chestnut trees, Plot's Elm, Aldar pine) is not excluded. After the corridor demarcation by the building contractor, the proper cadastre studies in the corridor, marking the trees to be felled, avoiding the protected species as to the extent possible and accomplishing the procedures envisaged by the Law of Removing the Red-Listed Species from the Natural Environment are necessary. A concrete plan of compensatory planting must be developed and agreed with Tbilisi and Rustavi Municipalities and Ministry of Environmental Protection.

After the presentation of the EIA report, the participants of the public review were given the possibility to express their own opinions and notes. A question about the reasons for the resettlement problem not considered under the EIA report and the population subject to resettlement not informed about the public review was put. In this respect, I. Kaviladze explained to the author of the question that in connection to the resettlement issues a study is underway and a resettlement action plan is being developed, which will thoroughly cover all questions of resettlement. As soon as the said plan is ready, it will be subject to the public review in line with the requirements of the Asian Bank of Development. The information about the questions and proposal during the public review is given in the annex.

116

Info

rmat

ion

abou

t the

que

stio

ns a

nd p

ropo

sal d

urin

g th

e pu

blic

revi

ew o

f the

EIA

Rep

ort o

f con

stru

ctio

n of

Tbi

lisi-P

onic

hala

and

Pon

icha

la-

Rust

avi s

ectio

ns o

f Tbi

lisi-R

usta

vi s

peed

way

No

.

Auth

ors

of q

uest

ions

, not

es

and

prop

osal

s Q

uest

ion

Answ

er

No

tes

an

d p

roposa

l duri

ng th

e p

ublic

revi

ew

1

T.

Gu

gu

shvi

li (A

arh

us

Ce

ntr

e)

and

I. S

vanid

ze (

Gre

en

A

ltern

ativ

e)

The

EIA

re

port

was

no

t a

ccep

tible

fo

r th

em

T

he E

IA r

eport

was

not acc

epta

ble

fo

r th

em

, a

s it

did

no

t co

ver

the

rese

ttle

men

t is

sues.

As

they

exp

lain

ed

, E

IA s

ho

uld

co

ver

the a

naly

sis

of e

nvi

ron

men

tal,

soci

al a

nd a

ll e

xpe

cted im

pa

cts.

T

he E

IA is

d

rafte

d in

th

e fo

rma

t co

nsi

sten

t w

ith th

e le

gis

latio

n of

Ge

org

ia (

Pro

visi

on o

f th

e E

nvi

ron

menta

l Pro

tect

ion

Ag

en

cy o

f O

cto

be

r 4

, 2

01

1)

and

A

DB

re

quir

em

ents

fo

r C

ate

gory

B

pro

ject

s (I

niti

al

Envi

ron

menta

l E

xam

inatio

n).

The r

ese

ttle

me

nt

issu

es

are

dis

cuss

ed

in c

hap

ter

5.3

of

the

do

cum

en

t to

the

ext

en

t du

e f

or

the

do

cum

ents

of

the g

iven

fo

rma

t. I

n p

art

icu

lar,

chap

ter

5.3

(p

p.

84

-89)

consi

ders

th

e

abst

ract

of

the m

ain

data

kn

ow

n a

t th

e d

eve

lop

ing s

tage

of

EIA

rep

ort

, d

esc

riptio

n o

f n

um

ber

of

the

affe

cted

lega

l a

nd

phys

ica

l en

titie

s, k

ind

of

imp

act

, ty

pe o

f b

usi

ness

obje

cts

and b

rie

f desc

riptio

n o

f th

e A

DB

re

settle

men

t p

rinci

ple

s.

In a

dditi

on,

the e

xpla

natio

n a

bo

ut

a s

epara

te r

ese

ttle

ment

act

ion p

lan

bein

g d

eve

lop

ed

to

be p

ublis

he

d a

nd p

ublic

ly r

evi

ew

ed

was

ma

de

. D

urin

g th

e do

cum

ent

dra

ftin

g,

the co

nsu

ltatio

ns

with

th

e im

pact

ed

peo

ple

will

be o

rga

niz

ed in

div

idua

lly a

nd in

gro

ups.

A

t p

rese

nt, t

he

rese

ttle

ment

act

ion p

lan i

s b

ein

g c

om

ple

ted a

nd

it

will

b

e p

ub

lished

at

the e

nd

of

Ma

rch o

f 2012,

and

its

public

re

view

will

be

p

resu

ma

bly

held

at th

e b

egin

nin

g o

f A

pri

l.

As

for

the

EIA

/IE

E

docu

me

nt,

its

final

vers

ion

sh

all

incl

ud

e

the

a

ccura

te i

nfo

rmatio

n d

eliv

ere

d b

y th

e t

ea

m d

raftin

g t

he

re

settle

me

nt

pla

n a

s so

on a

s a

t th

e c

urr

en

t st

ag

e.

2

T.

Gu

gu

shvi

li (A

arh

us

Ce

ntr

e)

and

I. S

vanid

ze (

Gre

en

A

ltern

ativ

e)

Wh

ere

th

e in

form

atio

n a

bout th

e p

ub

lic

revi

ew

was

pub

lishe

d?

Exp

lan

atio

n:

the

info

rmatio

n a

bou

t th

e p

lan

ned r

evi

ew

wa

s pub

lishe

d

in t

he

new

spa

pe

r “T

he 2

4 h

ou

r” a

nd o

n A

arh

us

Cen

tre a

nd

MD

F w

eb

-si

tes.

3

I. S

van

idze

(G

reen

Alte

rnativ

e)

The

p

rese

nte

d

EIA

s d

o

no

t co

nsi

der

the

alte

rna

tives

of

ea

ch

sect

ion

or

exp

ect

ed

en

viro

nm

enta

l im

pact

a

ssess

me

nt,

and

there

is n

o d

ue

calc

ula

tion o

r va

lidatio

n.

Th

e

mo

de

rn

EIA

p

rin

ciple

s m

ea

n

consi

deri

ng

th

e

me

an

ingfu

l a

ltern

ativ

es

and

no

t n

om

ina

l exe

cutio

n o

f p

roce

dure

s.

The E

IA c

onta

ins

the e

xpla

na

tion

ab

out

the

Pro

ject

of

Tbili

si-R

ust

avi

b

ein

g d

ivid

ed i

nto

3 s

ub-s

ect

ions.

At

pre

sen

t, a

n i

nte

nse

stu

dy

of

the

alte

rna

tives

of

2nd

se

ctio

n

of

the

road

is

un

de

rwa

y,

cove

ring

the

com

ple

x an

aly

sis

of

the

e

xist

ing

ro

ad

corr

idor

and

oth

er

poss

ible

ro

ute

s (incl

ud

ing

en

viro

nm

enta

l and

rese

ttle

ment

asp

ect

s).

Th

e

117

ana

lysi

s of

alte

rnativ

e r

ou

tes

is p

aid

much

atte

ntio

n t

o in

the

fe

asi

bili

ty

stu

dy

of th

e m

entio

ned s

ect

ion a

nd E

IA.

As

for

sect

ion

1 (

Tb

ilisi

-Pon

ich

ala

) a

nd

se

ctio

n 3

(P

on

ich

ala

-Ru

stavi

),

the P

roje

ct e

nvi

sage

s th

e m

od

ern

iza

tion a

nd e

xte

nsi

on o

f th

e e

xist

ing

ro

ad a

nd n

ot

the

co

nst

ruct

ion o

f ne

w s

ect

ions,

an

d d

iffere

nt

route

s w

ere

not m

ean

ing

ful a

ltern

ativ

es

for

the p

rese

nte

d P

roje

ct.

Th

e

map

s sh

ow

n

in

the

EIA

, cl

earl

y sh

ow

th

at

Tb

ilisi

-Po

nic

ha

la

sect

ions

follo

ws

a n

arr

ow

corr

ido

r b

etw

een

the

riv

er

Mtk

vari (

on

its

le

ft)

an

d s

teep

m

ou

nta

in sl

ope o

f S

havn

ava

ba r

idge

(o

n i

ts r

ight)

, w

here

there

is n

o e

ither

nee

d,

or

poss

ibili

ty o

f an

y alte

rna

tive r

oute

, as

in g

en

era

l, th

e im

pact

on

the

en

viro

nm

enta

l an

d s

oci

al en

viro

nm

ent

is

with

in

the

no

rms

or

eve

n

less

th

an

alo

ng

oth

er

sect

ions

of

the

sp

ee

dw

ay.

T

he

re

is

no

to

pog

rap

hic

all

limita

tion

fo

r th

e

sect

ion

Pon

ichala

-Rust

avi

, bu

t a

ny

rero

utin

g i

s a

ssoci

ate

d w

ith p

ene

tratin

g

the s

ettle

d a

rea

s th

us

incr

ea

sing

th

e im

pa

ct o

f re

settle

men

t. T

his

is s

o

clearl

y se

en

on

the

ma

ps

that

need

s no

sp

eci

al

qu

an

titativ

e

eva

luatio

n.

As

a r

ule

, th

e e

xte

nsi

on o

f th

e e

xist

ing r

oad i

s a

prio

ri

ass

oci

ate

d w

ith l

ess

im

pact

on t

he

natu

ral

and

so

cial

envi

ron

men

t,

and

th

e a

ltern

ativ

es

are

sou

gh

t in

the

exc

ep

tiona

l ca

se w

he

n t

here

a

re s

ignifi

cant

limita

tions

(tech

nic

al

or

soci

al/e

nvi

ronm

enta

l).

Such

an

exc

ep

tion

is

the

2n

d s

ect

ion

of

the

roa

d (

Po

nic

hala

sect

ion),

where

th

e

exi

stin

g r

oa

d is

lim

ited b

y d

en

sely

po

pu

late

d a

rea

s fr

om

its

bo

th s

ide

s.

Desp

ite t

he

ab

ove

-me

ntio

ne

d a

nd

cla

rity

of

the iss

ue,

the r

evi

sed I

EE

o

f P

onic

ha

la-R

ust

avi

se

ctio

n in

clu

des

exp

en

de

d ch

ap

ter

rela

ted to

A

na

lysi

s o

f A

ltern

ativ

es

with

ad

diti

ona

l g

raph

ic

an

d

qu

an

tita

tive

in

form

atio

n

maki

ng

the

unp

rom

isin

g

natu

re

of

the

sea

rch

for

alte

rna

tive

rou

tes

eve

n c

lea

rer.

4

I. S

van

idze

(G

reen

Alte

rnativ

e)

The

rep

ort

says

tha

t p

eo

ple

no

t ha

vin

g the

ir

plo

ts le

ga

lized a

re n

ot e

ligib

le f

or

com

pensa

tion. T

his

is a

gain

st th

e A

DB

re

qu

irem

en

ts. T

he

report

als

o s

ays

tha

t ea

ch f

am

ily w

ill r

ece

ive

200 G

EL f

or

tran

sport

atio

n. W

hic

h c

rite

ria w

ere

use

d to

fix this

am

oun

t?

Th

e r

ep

ort

do

es

not

con

tain

any

info

rmatio

n i

mply

ing t

hat

tho

se n

ot

havi

ng t

heir

plo

ts l

eg

aliz

ed a

re n

ot

elig

ible

for

com

pensa

tion

, but

on

th

e c

on

trary

, pa

ragra

ph

5.3

cle

arl

y sa

ys th

at:

x A

ll aff

ect

ed

peo

ple

, notw

ithst

andin

g

their

lega

l rights

to

pro

pert

y, w

ill re

ceiv

e th

e diff

ere

nt

aid

to

re

serv

e th

eir pre

-pro

ject

mean

s of su

bsi

stence

and li

ving s

tandard

s.

x T

hose

usi

ng

the

land

illegally

, w

ill

not

rece

ive

the

com

pensa

tion

for

the

loss

of

land

, but

they

will

b

e

com

pensa

ted fo

r th

e lo

ss of

any

oth

er

pro

pert

y ow

ned by

them

on t

he g

iven l

an

d.

They

will

als

o r

ece

ive t

he a

low

ance

s to

main

tain

or

impro

ve t

heir

livi

ng s

tanda

rds.

In

add

ition

, w

e w

ould

lik

e t

o e

xpla

in t

ha

t in

lin

e w

ith t

he

AD

B

118

requ

ire

me

nts

, th

ose

occ

upyi

ng

the

land

ill

egally

(w

ith

no

regis

tere

d p

rope

rty

righ

t of

the l

and

or

any

oth

er

lega

l basi

s to

re

cog

niz

e t

he l

and

pro

pe

rty

rig

ht

with

its

fu

rther

regis

tra

tion),

will

n

ot

rece

ive

th

e

com

pensa

tion

fo

r la

nd

, b

ut

will

re

ceiv

e

the

com

pe

nsa

tion

fo

r th

e lo

ss o

f harv

est

, b

uild

ings

an

d pre

mis

es,

tr

ees

or

sourc

e o

f in

com

e.

The

vers

ion

of t

he P

roje

ct p

rese

nted

for

the

pub

lic r

evie

w

(par

a. 5

.3, p

. 87.

Com

pens

atio

n Le

gibi

lity)

say

s th

at:

‘The

fam

ilies

subje

ct

to

phys

ica

l re

sett

lem

en

t w

ill

rece

ive

mo

ne

tary

aid

o

f 2

00

G

el

pe

r fa

mily

fo

r tr

an

spo

rtatio

n

(to

hire

vehic

le t

o t

ransp

ort

the

fam

ily b

elo

ngin

gs)

and

moneta

ry a

id t

o

rest

ore

th

eir

inco

me s

ourc

e f

or

3 m

on

ths,

as

the a

id r

end

ere

d t

o

est

ablis

h

one

self

at

a

ne

w

loca

tion).

T

his

a

mou

nt

is

the

subsi

stence

min

imum

for

3 m

on

ths

am

oun

ting t

o 1

.11

2 G

el

per

fam

ily."

T

he

said

ci

tatio

n

was

take

n

from

th

e

“Lan

d

Acq

uis

ition

an

d

Rese

ttle

men

t F

ram

ew

ork

” (2

008)

agre

ed a

nd

app

rove

d w

ith t

he

AD

B b

y M

DF

. A

fte

r dis

closu

re o

f th

e f

irst

dra

ft o

f IE

E i

n J

anu

ary

2

01

2 a

nd p

rior

to t

he s

tart

up

of

pre

pa

ratio

n o

f th

e L

AR

P,

the

me

ntio

ned

fra

me

do

cum

ents

w

ere

up

da

ted.

Th

e

revi

sed

docu

men

t fo

rmula

tes

the

sa

id c

lause

as

follo

ws:

“T

he

fam

ilies

subje

ct

to

phys

ica

l re

sett

lem

en

t w

ill

rece

ive

a

dd

itional aid

to c

ove

r th

eir c

ost

of

transp

ort

atio

n (

31

1 G

el) a

nd

3

mo

nth

s’ s

ubsi

stence

min

imu

m (

3x3

11 G

el) t

o h

elp

alle

via

te t

he

tra

nsi

tiona

l p

eri

od

.”

Th

e

final,

corr

ect

ed

ve

rsio

n

of

EIA

w

ill

acc

ord

ing

ly c

on

tain

th

is c

lause

.

At

the

sam

e t

ime,

we w

ou

ld l

ike

to o

nce

aga

in u

nde

rlin

e t

ha

t th

is

cla

use

talk

s abo

ut

the

ad

diti

ona

l a

id o

nly

, w

hile

the

com

pensa

tion

itself

cove

rs t

he c

om

pensa

tion

of

the

lost

pro

pe

rty

(lan

d,

build

ings

and

pre

mis

es,

tre

es)

an

d o

ne

-ye

ar

harv

est

of

ann

ua

l pla

nts

at

the

full

rep

lace

me

nt co

st.

At

last

, th

e c

ited

fra

gm

en

t is

take

n f

rom

th

e p

art

of

para

gra

ph 5

.3

of IE

E c

on

side

rin

g the

elig

ibili

ty p

rin

cip

les

ap

pro

ved fo

r th

e P

roje

ct

and

no

t ab

ou

t re

al

impact

s. T

he

lis

t o

f re

al

impact

s do

es

no

t in

clud

e t

he d

esc

riptio

n o

f th

e p

hys

ical re

settle

ment

of

the a

ffe

cte

d

fam

ilie

s fr

om

the

ir p

lace

of

resi

den

ce.

No s

uch

case

take

s pla

ce

und

er

the

Pro

ject

.

Th

e fin

al E

IA v

aria

nts

are

attach

ed

by

the b

roch

ure

s duri

ng

th

e

119

consu

ltatio

ns

with

the

popula

tion

as

an

ann

ex,

whic

h g

ive

s a

de

taile

d

desc

riptio

n o

f re

settle

me

nt pri

nci

ple

s a

gre

ed

with

the

AD

B.

5

A q

uest

ion

abou

t th

e w

ast

e w

as

put:

Where

an

d h

ow

will

th

e w

ast

e g

en

era

ted

d

uri

ng

th

e w

ork

be p

lace

d? T

he

EIA

sta

tes

that

the

wast

e

will

be

pla

ced

at

the

mu

nic

ipa

l la

nd

fills

, w

hile

in

th

e

curr

en

t si

tuatio

n

it is

im

poss

ible

to

m

ee

t th

is

req

uire

me

nt,

as

the

e

xist

ing

la

ndfil

l is

a

lre

ad

y o

verf

illed

.

In

add

ition

, th

e

pla

ce

and

m

anner

of

pla

cem

ent

of

the ha

zard

ou

s w

ast

e m

ust

b

e in

dic

ate

d.

Th

e E

IA s

ays

th

at

there

is a

deci

sio

n to c

lose

up

Ia

glu

ji la

nd

fill a

nd

its

con

serv

atio

n

pro

ject

w

ill

be

d

eve

lop

ed

. T

he

co

nse

rva

tion

nee

ds

the

cove

ring

of

the

clo

sed

land

fill w

ith in

ert

fill

mate

rial.

The

IE

E r

eco

mm

ends

usi

ng t

he

inert

ma

teria

l ge

ne

rate

d d

uri

ng

th

e

const

ruct

ion

of

Tb

ilisi

-Ru

sta

vi r

oa

d f

or

this

purp

ose

. T

his

has

two

kin

ds

of

en

viro

nm

enta

l b

ene

fits:

on

th

e o

ne h

and

, th

e n

eed f

or

tra

nsp

ort

ing t

he

in

ert

ma

teria

l fro

m b

orr

ow

pits

to

co

ver

the la

nd

fill

will

be

re

duce

d a

nd

on

th

e o

the

r h

an

d,

the

pro

ble

m o

f p

lace

men

t o

f th

e c

onst

ruct

ion

ine

rt m

ate

ria

ls w

ill b

e s

imp

ly s

ett

led

. A

s fo

r th

e

oth

er

wast

e,

incl

ud

ing

dom

est

ic,

haza

rdous,

etc

.,

acc

ord

ing

to

E

IA,

such

w

ast

e

sha

ll be

pla

ced

by

lice

nse

d

com

pa

nie

s und

er

the a

gre

em

ent.

6

W

as

the

re a

ny

stud

y un

de

rtake

n t

o s

pe

cify

th

e n

eed f

or

this

road

? I

f ye

s, w

hat

is i

ts

effe

ct?

Yes,

the

stu

dy

was

acc

om

plis

he

d a

t th

e e

arl

y st

age

of th

e p

roje

ct

deve

lop

me

nt an

d e

arly

stag

es

of th

e p

roje

ct p

repara

tion.

7

Wh

y th

is m

ee

ting

is

n

ot

atte

nd

ed

b

y th

e

repre

sen

tativ

es

of

the

org

an

izatio

n w

ork

ing

on

th

e r

ese

ttle

me

nt is

sues?

The

me

etin

g i

s atten

de

d b

y th

e r

epre

sen

tativ

es

auth

orize

d t

o g

ive

an

swers

ab

ou

t th

e r

ese

ttle

me

nt

issu

es

(Mr.

D.

Bain

du

rash

vili

(MD

F)

an

d M

r. A

vto

Okr

om

ched

lish

vili

(ind

ep

en

de

nt

aud

itor)

). A

t th

e s

am

e

time

, w

e

would

lik

e

to

un

de

rlin

e

that

the

con

sulta

tion

s a

bo

ut

the

re

settle

me

nt

issu

es

with

th

e a

ffect

ed

peo

ple

take

s pla

ce i

n a

noth

er

form

at

(ind

ivid

ua

lly a

nd

in

fo

cus

gro

ups)

, w

hile

th

e

revi

ew

of

the

rese

ttle

men

t a

ctio

n p

lan

do

cum

ents

will

be o

rgan

ized

at

a s

ep

ara

te

me

etin

g a

t th

e e

nd

of M

arc

h/a

t th

e b

egin

nin

g o

f A

pri

l.

120

Protocol PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS 9 -March, 2012

The Modernization of Tbilisi-Rustavi Section of the Tbilisi-Red Bridge (Azrbaijani Border) Road Project

LARP for Section -1

Public Consultations for Tbilisi - Phonichala (Isani-Samgori district) population and Business Representatives

Brief description: The Government of Georgia (GOG) has received a loan (USD 85 million) from

the Asian Development Bank (ADB) through a Multitranche Financing Facility (MFF) for

implementing the Project-1 titled as the Modernization of Tbilisi-Rustavi Section of the Tbilisi-Red

Bridge (Azerbaijani Border) Road, under Sustainable Urban Transport Investment Program. The

Modernization of existing 17.8km Tbilisi-Rustavi road is divided into 3-sections. Section-1: 3.9km

existing road between Tbilisi (Gulua Bridge) and Phonichala settlement (Kvemo Phonichala);

Section-2 is 7.1km existing Phonichala road from 3.9km to 11 km and section-3 is 6.8km existing

Rustavi road from 11km to 17.8 km. All sections of this project require preparation and

implementation of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plans for providing compensation and

resettlement assistance to the affected families/persons for protecting or betterment their socio-

economic position in respect of pre-project level. LARP-I prepared for section-1.

The design road portion Tbilisi-Rustavi (part of Tbilisi-Red Bridge (Azerbaijani border highway) links the capital of Georgia with the major industrial and administrative center Rustavi and the district center Gardabani. Designing and constructing of other portions of the road will enable the citizens to travel and commodities to be trafficked on comfortable and modern highway to the capital of Azerbaijan Baku. It also will make more accessible Tbilisi and the Black sea ports of Georgia for population of Azerbaijan. With about 120,000 inhabitants, Rustavi is the main satellite city of Tbilisi urban area. Therefore, there are numerous trips between Rustavi and Tbilisi given that many Rustavi inhabitants commute on daily basis towards Tbilisi. The existing 2-lanes highway (one in each direction) has not enough capacity to carry the whole traffic entering or exiting Tbilisi at peak hours. The detail design consultant (CONSULTANT) – “Dohwa” hired by the Municipal Development Fund of Georgia within the frames of the project “The Modernization of Tbilisi-Rustavi Section of the Tbilisi-Red Bridge Road” has conducted public consultation meetings with affected stakeholders. This meeting related to the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARP 1) was held in the MDF office on 9th of March, 2012. The meeting was attended by the local population, business representatives and MDF representatives. The aim of the stakeholder consultations was to deliver information to interested stakeholders and project affected land owners during the Resettlement Action Plan preparation process about the resettlement policy and principles, compensation eligibility and entitlements, complaints and grievance redress mechanism, claims and comments submission form. Information has been provided both verbally and by brief information leaflets. The information leaflets include information related to the resettlement policy, principles of compensation eligibility and entitlements, also recognition and registration of the ownership rights on non-rightfully owned land according to the Georgian Legislation. This allows timely and full consideration of the opinions and comments around the project expressed by the interested parties. The comments and opinions provided by interested stakeholders during early stage of

121

public consultation process will be addressed in the final draft of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plans (LARPs). Preparation of LARP should include the following: (I) detailed measurement survey (DMS), (II) evaluation of assets/evaluation of affected land plots, (III) consultations with affected rayons and people, (IV) AP census survey – by 100%, (V) AH socio-economic research. LARP preparation process has covered intensive consultations with interested stakeholders including project affected people.

This LARP-I was prepared by MDF based on detailed design and the requirements of the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statements 2009. The meeting was attended by: The implementing agency: David Baindurashvili - Municipal Development Fund of Georgia. Nino Patarashvili - Municipal Development Fund of Georgia. The Asian Development Bank (ADB): Medgar Chelidze – ADB Resettlement Consultant; The Consultants: Keti Dgebuadze – Consortium DOHWA Ltd (Korea)/Ltd “Transproeqti” Social/Resettlement Expert, Independent Auditor – Consortium DOHWA Ltd (Korea)/Ltd “Transproeqti” Population and Business representatives affected by construction of Tbilisi-Phonichala section of the road (see attached lists). The first part of the presentation was hosted by Mr. D. Baindurashvili – Municipal development Fund, who informed the public about the Project, institutions implementing and financing the project as well as about Work Timeline of the project. The second part of the presentation were hosted by K. Dgebuadze, Medgar Chelidze and Avto Okromchedlishvili. K.Dgebuadze talked about compensation entitlements and documents for ownership rights, in particular: Land acquisition and resettlement tasks under the project will be implemented according to a compensation and entitlement matrix following the approved land acquisition and resettlement framework in compliance with active Georgian laws and ADB’s policy on involuntary resettlement. She also explained Complaints and Grievance Redress Mechanism. A grievance mechanism will be available to allow an AP appealing any disagreeable decision, practice or activity arising from land or other assets compensation. Mr. Chelidze presented in detail the ADB’s Land Acquisition and Resettlement Policy and principles, in particular: land for construction of the new road will be acquired under the active laws in Georgia. However, additional requirements of the ADB will be met to ensure that all affected persons are compensated at the replacement costs and/or receive adequate allowances according to severity of impacts and vulnerability status. The presentation was followed by a Q&A session. The questions and comments of different participating parties were replied by the relevant experts of the project: The questions and answers are given in Table # 1.

Table # 1 Place of event: Municipal Development Fund of Georgia, (Tbilisi). Date and time of event: March 9, 2012, 15:00 p.m. Photos #1,2,3,4,5,6 – Public Consultations in MDF office

122

Participants: 1. David Baindurashvili – Municipal development Fund 2. Nino Patarashvili - Municipal development Fund 3. Keti Dgebuadze –Social/Resettlement Expert of the Consortium “DOHWA”/”Trensproeqti 4. Avto Okromchedlishvili – Consortium “DOHWA”/”Trensproeqti - Auditor/Eppriser 5. Medgar Chelidze – ADB Resettlement Consultant 6. David Gagua – Phonichala local population 7. David Chakhmauri – Ltd “Speroza” 8.Gocha Khitiri – JSC “Visol Petroleum Georgia” 9. Soso Pkhakadze - JSC “Visol Petroleum Georgia” 10. Suren Ivanishvili - Phonichala local population 11.Nugzar Shoshiashvili – Ltd “Supervazitalia” 12. Ilia Berikashvili – Ltd “Gani Group”

123

13. Goga Kavlashvili – Phisical person “Kavlashvili Goga” 14. Nino Lukishvili – Ltd “Maksoil” 15. Nino Makhatadze – Ltd “Lukoil Georgia” 16. Roman Korkotadze – Ltd “PiEm Group” 17. Lali Panchulidze – Ltd “Quta” 18. Shota Ninua – Ltd “Delta-1” 19. Maia Ninua – Ltd “Delta-1” 20. Kekelidze Avtandil – Ltd “Delta-1” 21. Gia Ladashvili – NGO- “Information Center of Social Reforms” Question-and-Answer session: No. Question/Comment Author Expert comment 1.

The road under the project will be categorised as hygway, which means that there will not be opportunity to digress from main road to reach our residual land plot (which have not been acquired under the project) and we have to cover additional distance to reach the right place. In this case the business at the residual land plot losses viability.

David Gagua The viability of the residual land parcel will

be estimated by the independent auditor.

In case of residual land parcel is

considered unviable, the owner will be

asked to make a choice: to get cash

compensation for the residual land or to

keep the land under the ownership.

The auditing company will inform the

Municipal Development Fund (MDF) of

Georgia about this kind of cases and if it is

confirmed that the residual land parcel is

unviable, the Government will acquire this

residual land parcel according to the

market price. Also businesses will be fully

compensated according to the ADB

requirements.

2.

What is the land compensation price?

Suren Ivanishvili At present the research/evaluation process of identification of market rate for land compensation is underway taking into account investors and government’s interests.

At present, costs for Tbilisi-Phonichala section are identified:

Private land:

km 0 – 0.5 – 179 GEL/sq.m km 0.5 – 1.0 107 GEL/sq.m

km 1.0 – 4.0 64 GEL/sq.m Agricultural land:

km 1.0 – 4.0 54 GEL/sq.m Evaluation methodology implies identification of market price on the basis of real negotiations related to the existing legal documents confirming ownership rights and acquisition of land plots. Final price will be identified when the representative of Municipal Development Fund will come to each affected landowner to sign the contract.

124

3. We have the business at the project territory. Part of neccessary infrastruqture for our business is located at the territory owned by us, but the second part is located at the territory which is not in our ownership. We are interested if the compensation is envisaged for the land parcel which is not in our ownership but our business structures are located at this territory?

David Chakhmauri Compensation for land plots will be implemented in two cases:

- In first case – for owners with full registration; and

- In second case - for legalizable owners

In case of Non-legalizable land users land compensation will not be provided. Though, according to the requirements of the ADB full compensation for crops, for buildings and businesses will be provided. As regards the infrastructure, it will be relocated and you will be able to use it again: it will be connected with water supply system, suwerage system, gas supply system, etc. In case if it is specific infrastructure – you will be provided with compensation for relocation your infrastructure at new place.

4. Is the mentioned alignment final or some changes will be envisaged?

Ilia Berikashvili Changes can be envisaged, but it will be insignificant for main alignment.

5. As you have mentioned for business losses you will provide cash indemnity of 1 year net income, though I would say that the business is not only income and for launching the business activities certain investments are needed.

Soso Pkhakadze Under the project for business losses cash indemnity of 1 year net income will be provided. At the same time land plot will be fully acquired under the project according to the owners desire. For buildings/structures losses cash compensation at full replacement costs free of depreciation and transaction will be provided; Also, for equipment installation/deinstallation and transportation expenses special allowances will be provided.

6.

I have land which is rented by Turkish citizens. At present, at the mentioned territory car boxes are located. Few months ago Turkish citizens has left the territory without paying the rental fee. Will be this fee compensated under the project?

Local population In case when official leasing agreement is available, the leaseholder will receive compensation for 1 year net income and the owner will receive 1 year rental fee as compensation for lost incomes. On the other hand, if the leaseholder has left few months ago it means that at present at the territory owned by you business activities are stopped and the rental contract is not in force. In this case you will be provided with compensation for the land, which will be acquired under the project, also you will be provided with the compensation for trees and existing infrastructure, but you will not be provided with the rent fee of stopped business

7.

In case of negotiations failed related with price, what will be the next stage?

Lali Panchulidze In case, there remains further dispute

related to ownership, the case may be

referred to the Rayon court and conclusion

regarding ownership right will be made

according to the court decision. But,

before the court it can be solved by

negotiations. At the information booklets

you can find Claims and Comments

Submission Forms.

129

Protocol PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS 15-20 -December, 2011

The Modernization of Tbilisi-Rustavi Section of the Tbilisi-Red Bridge (Azrbaijani Border) Road Project

Public Consultations in Gardabani rayon and in the city of Rustavi Brief description: The Modernization of Tbilisi-Rustavi Section of the Tbilisi-Red Bridge (Azrbaijani Border) Road Project is implementing by Municipal Development Fund of Georgia. Project is financed by the Asian Development Bank (ADB). The design road portion Tbilisi-Rustavi (part of Tbilisi-Red Bridge (Azerbaijani border highway) links the capital of Georgia with the major industrial and administrative center Rustavi and the district center Gardabani. Designing and constructing of other portions of the road will enable the citizens to travel and commodities to be trafficked on comfortable and modern highway to the capital of Azerbaijan Baku. It also will make more accessible Tbilisi and the Black sea ports of Georgia for population of Azerbaijan. With about 120,000 inhabitants, Rustavi is the main satellite city of Tbilisi urban area. Therefore, there are numerous trips between Rustavi and Tbilisi given that many Rustavi inhabitants commute on daily basis towards Tbilisi. The existing 2-lanes highway (one in each direction) has not enough capacity to carry the whole traffic entering or exiting Tbilisi at peak hours. In this context, the Georgian Road Department has decided to improve the capacity of Tbilisi – Rustavi link by upgrading the road into a full-grade separated freeway. The detail design consultant (CONSULTANT) – “Dohwa” hired by the Municipal Development Fund of Georgia within the frames of the project “The Modernization of Tbilisi-Rustavi Section of the Tbilisi-Red Bridge Road” has conducted public hearing meetings related to the Preliminary Resettlement Study (Due Diligence Report) in the Gardabani district and the City of Rustavi on 15th and 20th of December, 2011, which were attended by the local population and representatives of the local authorities. The aim of the public hearings was to deliver information to interested stakeholders and project affected land owners during the Preliminary Resettlement Study (Due Diligence Report) preparation process about the resettlement policy and principles, compensation eligibility and entitlements, complaints and grievance redress mechanism, claims and comments submission form. Information has been provided both verbally and by brief information leaflets. The information leaflets include information related to the resettlement policy, principles of compensation eligibility and entitlements, also recognition and registration of the ownership rights on non-rightfully owned land according to the Georgian Legislation. This allows timely and full consideration of the opinions and comments around the project expressed by the interested parties. The comments and opinions provided by interested stakeholders during early stage of public consultation process will be addressed in the final draft of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plans (LARPs).

Preparation of LARP should include the following: (I) detailed measurement survey (DMS), (II) evaluation of assets/evaluation of affected land plots, (III) consultations with affected rayons and people, (IV) AP census survey – by 100%, (V) AH socio-economic research. LARP

130

preparation process has covered intensive consultations with interested stakeholders including project affected people.

After preparation of LARPs (LARP1 and LARP2) for sections Tbilisi-Ponichala and Ponichala –Rustavi of the Project, the mentioned documents will be disclosed publicly and public consultations will be conducted. During the LARP preparation process consultation meetings will be conducted with all project affected families.

The project will be implemented according to the Social and Environmental Policies of the ADB and Georgian legislation. The meeting was attended by: Medgar Chelidze – ADB Resettlement Consultant; Keti Dgebuadze – Ltd. “WEG” Social/Resettlement Expert, Nurul Hoque – Ltd. “Dohwa” International Resettlement Expert, Avto Okromchedlishvili – Representative of Audit Company “Atos” hired by the “Dohwa” Ltd. The meeting was also attended by: the representatives of Governor’s Office of Rustavi city, Rustavi City Hall representatives and the local population (see attached lists). The first part of the presentation was hosted by Mr. G. Kobiashvili – Deputy Governor, who informed the public about the Project, institutions implementing and financing the project as well as about Work Timeline of the project. The second part of the presentation were hosted by ADB Resettlement Consultant - Medgar Chelidze and representative of Audit Company “Atos”- Avto Okromchedlishvili. Mr. Chelidze presented the ADB’s Land Acquisition and Resettlement Policy and principles, in particular: land for construction of the new road will be acquired under the active laws in Georgia. However, additional requirements of the ADB will be met to ensure that all affected persons are compensated at the replacement costs and/or receive adequate allowances according to severity of impacts and vulnerability status. Experts also talked about compensation entitlements and documents for ownership rights, in particular: Land acquisition and resettlement tasks under the project will be implemented according to a compensation and entitlement matrix following the approved land acquisition and resettlement framework in compliance with active Georgian laws and ADB’s policy on involuntary resettlement. Experts also talked about Complaints and Grievance Redress Mechanism. A grievance mechanism will be available to allow an AP appealing any disagreeable decision, practice or activity arising from land or other assets compensation.

The presentation was followed by a Q&A session. The questions and comments of different participating parties were replied by the relevant experts of the project: The questions and answers are given in Tables # 1, 2.

131

Table # 1 Place of event: Gardabani District. Date and time of event: December 15, 2011, 12:00 a.m. Photos #1,2,3 – Public Consultations in Gardabani District

Participants: 1. Deputy Gamgebeli 2. Medgar Chelidze – ADB Resettlement Consultant 3. Keti Dgebuadze – Ltd. “WEG” Social/Resettlement Expert 4. Nurul Hoque – International Expert of Ltd “Dohwa” 5. Avto Okromchedlishvili – Ltd. “Atos”, Auditor/Eppriser 6. Nizami Bairamov - Local Population 5. Namaz Mamedov - Local Population 6. Sujadin Alieva - Local Population 7. Salhadin Fashev - Local Population 8. Nazim Phashev - Local Population 9. Rasim Abdulaev - Local Population 10. Solmaz Aliev - Local Population 11. Pharmani - Local Population

See attached – List of participants of Public Hearings.

132

Question-and-Answer session: No. Question/Comment Author Expert comment 1. When the construction

of road will start? Local Population The construction of road will start in

Summer of 2012.

The process of Resettlement and

compensation will start in Spring of 2012.

2.

What is the land compensation price?

Local Population

At present the research/evaluation process of identification of market rate for land compensation is underway taking into account investors and government’s interests. Evaluation methodology implies identification of market price on the basis of real negotiations related to the existing legal documents confirming ownership rights and acquisition of land plots. Final price will be identified when the representative of Municipal Development Fund will come to each affected landowner to sign the contract.

3.

In case when only part of

the whole land parcel is

affected, is the residual

land parcel subject for

compensation?

Local population The viability of the residual land parcel will

be estimated by the independent auditor.

In case of residual land parcel is

considered unviable, the owner will be

asked to make a choice: to get cash

compensation for the residual land or to

keep the land under the ownership.

The auditing company will inform the

Municipal Development Fund (MDF) of

Georgia about this kind of cases and if it is

confirmed that the residual land parcel is

unviable, the Government will acquire this

residual land parcel.

Compensation for land is restricted and is

possible only in that case when there is a

land available in reserve.

4. What are the categories of the land parcels?

Local population There are several categories, in particular: agricultural land, non-agricultural land, cropland, grazing land and hay land. The issue of irrigation also will be taken into account, etc. The prices of the land will be classified according t the categories of the land.

5. If AP would not like to sell the land plot what will happen in this case?

Local population

There is Eminent Domain Law in place, according to this law, based on court decision, the landowner will receive fair compensation and land will become property of State in accordance with expropriation rules defined in Eminent Domain Law. AP may request allocation of similar land plot instead of getting cash

133

compensation (if it is possible).

6. How the long-term trees/plants will be compensated?

Local population

Compensation value of long-term trees/plants will be defined according to the cash compensation at market rate on the basis of type, age and productive value of the trees.

Table # 2 Place of event: City of Rustavi, Governor’s Office. Date and time of event: December 20, 2011, 11:00 a.m. Photos #1,2,3 – Public Consultations in Rustavi

Participants:

1. G. Kobiashvili - Depury Governor of Rustavi

2. D. Japaridze – Vice-Mayor of City Rustavi

3. Medgar Chelidze – ADB Resettlement Consultant

4. Keti Dgebuadze – Ltd. “WEG” Social/Resettlement Expert

5. Nurul Hoque – International Expert of Ltd “Dohwa”

6. Avto Okromchedlishvili – Ltd. “Atos”, Auditor/Eppriser

7. Representatives of local population – 37 people (See Annex #2)

134

Question-and-Answer session: No. Question/Comment Author Expert comment 1. What is the width of the

road? Local population On average the width of the road is 30 50

m. The mentioned section of the road will be upgraded from 2-lane to 4-lane highway. Detailed measurement will be shown in LARPs, which will be disclosed as soon as it will be prepared.

2.

We are interested if any kind of compensation/ allowances for vulnerable people is envisaged by the project.

Local population If AHs receive Governments subsidies, or have status of the family, which is “under the poverty line”, or headed by the single-mother, etc, and there are official information/documents related to the above-mentioned status, all these persons will receive additional allowances.

3. What is the price of 1 sq. m. land plot?

Local population At present the research/evaluation process of identification of market rate for land compensation is underway. Evaluation methodology implies identification of market price on the basis of real negotiations related to the existing legal documents confirming ownership rights and acquisition of land plots.

4. In case of negotiations failed related with price, what will be the next stage?

Local populationIn case, there remains further dispute related to ownership, the case may be referred to the Rayon court and conclusion regarding ownership right will be made according to the court decision. But, before the court it can be solved by negotiations. At the information booklets you can find Claims and Comments Submission Forms.

5. How many people will be employed during the road construction process?

Local population

During the construction period in tender documents the employment of local population will be taken into account (it concerns both qualified and non-qualified employees). But first of all priority will be given to the vulnerable people which also will be reflected in tender documents.

6. What is the land compensation price?

Local Population

At present the research/evaluation process of identification of market rate for land compensation is underway taking into account investors and government’s interests. Evaluation methodology implies identification of market price on the basis of real negotiations related to the existing legal documents confirming ownership rights and acquisition of land plots. Final price will be identified when the representative of Roads Department will come to each affected landowner to sign the contract.

135

Attachmnt #1 - The list of participants of Public Hearings in Gardabani District

136

Annex #2 – The list of participants of Public Hearings in Rustavi.

138

ANNEX 8

REFERENCES

1. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement , 2009

Hydrology

1. ,,ȼɨɞɧɵɟ ɪɟɫɭɪɫɵ Ɂɚɤɚɜɤɚɡɶɹ" .ɉɨɞ ɪɟɞ. Ƚ.Ƚ. ɋɜɚɧɢɞɡɟ ɢ ȼ.ɒ. ɐɨɦɚɹ- Ʌɟɧɢɧɝɪɚɞ, ɢɡɞ.,, ɝɢɞɪɨɦɟɬɟɨɢɡɞɚɬ". 1988 ɝ. 2. ,,Ɋɟɫɭɪɫɵ ɩɨɜɟɪɯɧɨɫɬɧɵɯ ɜɨɞ ɋɋɋɊ, ɬɨɦ 9, Ɂɚɤɚɜɤɚɡɶɟ ɢ Ⱦɚɝɟɫɬɚɧ, ɜɵɩɭɫɤ 1, ɡɚɩɚɞɧɨɟ Ɂɚɤɚɜɤɚɡɶɟ " ɉɨɞ ɪɟɞ. Ƚ.ɇ. ɏɦɚɥɚɞɡɟ ɢ ȼ.ɒ. ɐɨɦɚɹ - Ʌɟɧɢɧɝɪɚɞ, ɢɡɞ. ,,ɝɢɞɪɨɦɟɬɟɨɢɡɞɚɬ". 1972 ɝ. 3. “Ɍɟɯɧɢɱɟɫɤɢɟ ɭɤɚɡɚɧɢɹ ɩɨ ɪɚɫɱɟɬɭ ɦɚɤɫɢɦɚɥɶɧɨɝɨ ɫɬɨɤɚ ɪɟɤ ɜ ɭɫɥɨɜɢɹɯ Ʉɚɜɤɚɡɚ" – Ɍɛɢɥɢɫɢ, ɢɡɞ. ,, Ɂɚɤɚɜɤɚɡɫɤɢɣ ɪɟɝɢɨɧɚɥɶɧɵɣ ɧɚɭɱɧɨ-ɢɫɫɥɟɞɨɜɚɬɟɶɫɤɢɣ ɢɧɫɬɢɬɭɬ (Ɂɚɤ ɇɂɂ)" . 1980 ɝ.

Geology

1. Mrevlishvili N., “Geology of Georgia” (1997), TSU, Tbilisi

2. Geomorphology of Georgia (1971), “Metsniereba”, Tbilisi

3. Hydrogeology of the USSR, v. X, Georgian SSR, Publishing house “Nedra”, Moscow, 1970.

4. Tsagurishvili A et al. 1:25 000-scale engineering-geological survey within the borders of the

river Mtkvari gorge, from Tbilisi to the state border of Georgia, Tbilisi, 1981.

5. Papava D., Devdariani E., Ageev V., Report of 1:25 000-scale geological survey works,

Tbilisi, 1971.

Ecology - Flora

1. z a z anaSv i l i n. 1997. saqa r Tve l os dac u l i t e r i t o r i eb i : awmyo da momava l i . WWF.

Tb i l i s i . 2. i van i aSv i l i m. 2000. b i o l og i u r i m r ava l f e r ovneb i s sae r TaSo r i so

ga r emosdacv i T i kanon i . me r i d i an i , Tb i l i s i . 3. kecxove l i n.n. 1957. saqa r Tve l os ku l t u r u l mcena r eTa z oneb i . mecn i e r eba.

Tb i l i s i . 4. kecxove l i n.n. 1959. saqa r Tve l os mcena r eu l i sa f a r i s r uka. dana r T i w i gn i sa:

`saqa r Tve l os mcena r eu l i sa f a r i ”. Tb i l i s i . 5. kecxove l i n.n., 1960. saqa r Tve l os mcena r eu l i sa f a r i . Tb i l i s i . 6. kecxove l i n.n. ( r ed .) 1977. dav i cvaT saqa r Tve l os ss r ve l u r i da ku l t u r u l i

mcena r eeb i . saq. mecn. akad . gamo c ., Tb i l i s i .

139

6. mayaSv i l i a. 1995. saqa r Tve l os xeeb i da buCqeb i ( r ed . g. naxu c r iSv i l i da n.

z a z anaSv i l i ). WWF, Tb i l i s i . 6. saqa r Tve l os mcena r eeb i s sa r kvev i . 1969. 2. saq. mecn. akad . gamo c ., Tb i l i s i . 6. saqa r Tve l os f l o r a. 1941-1952. 1-8. saq. mecn. akad . gamo c ., Tb i l i s i . 6. saqa r Tve l os f l o r a. 1970-2000. 1-13. mecn i e r eba, Tb i l i s i . 6. saqa r Tve l os ss r w i Te l i w i gn i . 1982. sabWo Ta saqa r Tve l o , Tb i l i s i . 6. qvaCak i Ze r . 1996. saqa r Tve l os geobo t an i ku r i da r a i oneba. mecn i e r eba, Tb i l i s i . 6. qvaCak i Ze r . 2001. saqa r Tve l os t yeeb i . Tb i l i s i . 7. Ƚɪɟɛɟɧɳɢɤɨɜ Ɉ.ɋ. 1965. Ƚɟɨɛɨɬɚɧɢɱɟɫɤɢɣ ɫɥɨɜɚɪɶ. Ɋɭɫɫɤɨ-Ⱥɧɝɥɢɣɫɤɨ-ɇɟɦɟɰɤɨ-Ɏɪɚɧɰɭɡɤɢɣ.

ɇɚɭɤɚ, Ɇɨɫɤɜɚ. 8. Ƚɭɥɢɫɚɲɜɢɥɢ ȼ.Ɂ. 1964. ɉɪɢɪɨɞɧɵɟ ɡɨɧɵ ɢ ɩɪɢɪɨɞɧɨ-ɢɫɬɨɪɢɱɟɫɤɢɟ ɨɛɥɚɫɬɢ Ʉɚɜɤɚɡɚ. ɇɚɭɤɚ,

Ɇɨɫɤɜɚ. 9. Ⱦɨɥɭɯɚɧɨɜ Ⱥ.Ƚ. 1989. Ɋɚɫɬɢɬɟɥɶɧɨɫɬɶ Ƚɪɭɡɢɢ. 1. Ʌɟɫɧɚɹ ɪɚɫɬɢɬɟɥɶɧɨɫɬɶ Ƚɪɭɡɢɢ. Ɇɟɰɧɢɟɪɟɛɚ,

Ɍɛɢɥɢɫɢ. 10. Ɇɚɪɞɚɥɟɢɲɜɢɥɢ Ɍ.Ʉ. 1970. ɇɨɜɵɟ ɢ ɪɟɞɤɢɟ ɜɢɞɵ ȼɨɫɬɨɱɧɨɣ Ƚɪɭɡɢɢ. Systematicae ac Geographicae

Instit. Botan. Thbilissiensis. 28, 105-109. 11. ɑɟɪɟɩɚɧɨɜ ɋ.Ʉ. 1981. ɋɨɫɭɞɢɫɬɵɟ ɪɚɫɬɟɧɢɹ ɋɋɋɊ. ɇɚɭɤɚ, Ʌɟɧɢɧɝɪɚɞ.

12. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, 3rd ed. Springer, Wien-New York.

13. Canter L.W. 1996. Environmental impact assessment. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill. New York, London, Tokyo,

Toronto. 14. Convention on Biological Diversity. 1995. UNEP. Switzerland (Russian version).

15. Council of Europe. Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats. Bern,

19.09.1979. 16. Forest Code of Georgia. 1999. Tbilisi.

17. Gagnidze R., Svanidze T., Gvritishvili M., Dekanoidze N., Kanchaveli K. 1996. Botanical description of

territories along the Pipeline Route from Azerbaijan border to Supsa terminal. Literature review. Vol. 2/ Biological Environment. GPC, GIOC, Tbilisi, 1-103 (in Georgian).

18. Groombridge B. (ed.). 1992. Global biodiversity: Status of the Earth’s Living Resources. Chapman & Hall, London, 47-52. 19. Harcharik D.A. 1997. The future of world forestry. Unasylva 190/191, 48, 4-8. 20. Hilton-Taylor, C. (compiler). 2000. 2000 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. 21. Isik K., Yaltirik F., Akesen A. 1997. The interrelationship of forests, biological diversity and the maintenance of natural resources. Unasylva 190/191, 48, 19-29.

140

22. IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. 23. IUCN. 2003. 2003 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [web application]. Available at www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 27 September 2004). 24. IUCN 2004. 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [web application]. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. 25. IUCN Red List Guidelines 2004 [web application]. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org. 26. Kikodze, D. 2002. Environmental baseline - BTC/SCP Pipeline Project ESIA. Dzelkva Ltd. 27. Lanly J.-P. 1997. World forest resources: situation and prospects. Unasylva 190/191, 48, 9-18. 28. Morris P. 1995. Ecology overview. EIA. 197-225. 29. Morris P., Thurling D., Shreeve T. 1995. Terrestrial ecology. EIA, 227-241. 30. Nakhutsrishvili G. 1999. The Vegetation of Georgia. Braun-Blanquetia, 15, 1-74. 31. Nakhutsrishvili G. 2000. Georgia’s basic biomes. Biological and Landscape Diversity of

Georgia. WWF, BMZ, Tbilisi, 43-68 (in Georgian, English). 32. Red List of Endangered Species of Georgia. 2003. Legisl. Proc. 3, Order N76, GSS Codex, GSS code- www.gss-ltd.com. 33. Red List of Georgia. 2006. Internet version, order. 34. Sakhokia M.F. 1961 (ed.). Botanical excursions over Georgia. Tbilisi. 35. The 2000 IUCN red list of threatened species. 2000 UNEP, WCMC. 36. WDPA Consortium. 2004. 2004 World Database on Protected Areas. IUCN-WCPA and UNEP-WCMC, Gland, Switzerland, Washington, DC, USA and Cambridge, UK. 37. Zazanashvili N., Sanadiradze G. 2000. The system of protected areas of Georgia at the junction of 20th – 21th centuries. Biological and Landscape Diversity of Georgia. WWF, BMZ. Tbilisi, 251-276 (in Georgian and English).

Ecology - Fauna

1. Bukhnikashvili. A., kandaurov A., Natradze I., 2008, Action Plan to protect the chiroptera in Georgia//Champester, Tbilisi, Georgia UNIVERSAL, p. 103.

2. Kutubidze M., 1985, Reference book of birds of Georgia,//Tbilisi, p. 648. 3. Law No. 2356-IIS “On the Red Data List and Red Book of Georgia: by Eduard

Shevardnadze, President of Georgia, Tbilisi, June 6, 2003; 4. “Georgian Law on fauna”, Decree No. 540 of December 26, 1996 by the

President of Georgia. 5. Red Book of the Georgian SSR, 1982// ”Soviet Georgia”, Tbilisi, p. 255. 6. Decree #303 of May 2, 2006 of the President of Georgia, “On Approval of the

Red Data List of Georgia” (Endangered Species List).

141

7. Bakradze M., Tarkhnishvili D., Chkhikvadze V., 1987, “About the spread of Syrian Spadefoot Toad (Pelobates syriacus) in Georgia”, // Herald of the Academy of Sciences of Georgian SSR, CXXVII, ʋ1: 165-168.

8. Bukhnikashvili. A. 2004. On Cadastre of Small Mammals (Insectivora, Chiroptera, Lagomorpha, Rodentia) of Georgia. // Publ. Hous “Universal”. Tbilisi: 138 pp.

9. Didmanidze E., Skhirtladze I., Ninua N., Gurgenidze L., Chkhikvadze V., 2002, “About some endemic, rare and endangered species of fauna in Georgia”.//New guidelines to solve the problems.//Tbilisi, Georgia “Satula”, p. 65.

10. Morgilevskaya I., 1989. Catalogue of Collection of Small Mammals of Institute of Zoology, Georgian Academy of Sciences. Tbilisi, Metsniereba. p. 28.

11. Muskhelishvili T., 1970. Reptiles of Eastern Georgia. Tbilisi, Metsniereba. 12. Abuladze, A., Eligulashvili, B., Shergalin, J., 2002. Wintering of raptors in Georgia //

Raptors in the New Millenium. Proc.of the World Conf. on Birds of Prey & Owls "RAPTORS 2000". Eilat, Israel, 2-8.04.2000. Ed. by Reuven Yosef, Michael L. Miller & David Pepler: 141.

13. Abuladze A., 1994. Birds of Prey in Georgia in XX c. Meyburg. raptor Conservation Today, WWGBP. Pica Press. pp. 23-28.

14. Abuladze A., 1997. Breeding Bird Survey along Oil Pipeline Route.

15. Abuladze A., 1998. Wintering Bird Survey along Oil Pipeline Route

16. Abuladze, A.V. 1979. Nesting of Griffon Vulture in East Georgia. Collection of papers "Nesting ecology of birds and methods of its study". Samarkand, Uzbekistan: 5-6. Text in Russian.

17. Abuladze, A.V. 1979. Data on distribution and biology of Egyptian Vulture in Georgia. Materials of 4th Conference of young researches of the Institute of Zoology of Georgian Academy of Sciences. Tbilisi, Metsniereba: 27-30 . Text in Russian.

18. Abuladze, A. 1993. The Black Stork in East Georgia in the 20th Century. Abstracts of the 1st International Black Stork Conservation and Ecology Symposium (Latvia, Jurmala, 19-24 April 1993): 23

19. Badridze J. et al (Editors: Tarkhnishvili D., Kikodze D.), 1996. Principal Characteristics of Georgian Biodiversity// Natura Caucasica, Vol. 1, p. 46.

20. Bukhnikashvili A., Kandaurov A., 1998. The Threatened and insufficiently studied species (Insectivora, Rodentia).// Tbilisi: 56 pp., 27 maps.

21. Bukhnikashvili A., Kandaurov A., 2002, "The Annotated List of Mammals of Georgia" //Proceedings of the Institute of Zoology of Academy of Sciences of the Georgia, Metsniereba, Tbilisi, vol. XXI : 319 – 340. [2004.08 - 04ɂ7.48 VINITI]

22. Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (Bonn Convention or CMS;), Secretariat of the Convention, September 1993.

23. E. Didmanidze, 2005, The butterflies of Georgia//Zoological Department of S. Janashia Museum of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia, “Sezan”, 87 pages

24. Elanidze R.F., 1983. Ichthyofauna of Rivers and Lakes of Georgia. Tbilisi, Metsniereba. (in Russian).

25. Elanidze, R.F., Demetrashvili, M.G., Burchuladze, O.G., Kurashvili, B.E., 1970. Atlas of the freshwater fish of Georgia. Metsniereba publ. house, Tbilisi.

26. Galvez R.A., Gavashelishvili L., Javakhishvili Z., 2005, Raptors and Owls of Georgia//GCCW and Buneba Print Publishing: 128 pages

27. Janashvili A., 1963. Animals of Georgia, Vol. III - Vertebrates. Tbilisi.

28. Tarkhnishvili, D., Kandaurov, A., Gurielidze, Z. and Matcharashvili, I., 1996. Review of Literature and Other Sources about Condition of the Environment on

142

the Territory of Georgia along the Early Oil Transportation Pipeline Corridor and Adjacent Territories from Georgia-Azerbaijan Border to Supsa Terminal. Zoology. pp. 1-53, Tbilisi, GPC: 1-53.

29. Tarkhnishvili, D. N., 1997. The Status of Amphibian Species in Georgia (C.I.S). DAPTF Reports series, J.W. Wilkinson (ed.), The Open University, Milton Keynes (UK).

30. Tarkhnishvili D., Kandaurov A., Bukhnikashvili A., 2002, "Declines of amphibians and reptiles in Georgia during the 20th century: virtual vs. actual problems" //Zeitschrift für Feldherpetologie, 2002, ʋ 9: 89-107.

31. Tarkhnishvili D., Serbinova I., Gavashelishvili A., 2009, Modelling the range of Syrian spadefoot toad (Pelobates syriacus) with combination of GIS-based approaches// Amphibia-Reptilia 30: 401-412

32. The Red Data List of Threatened Animals. IUCN. 2003 Internet version.

Cultural Heritage

1. Tbilisi, Old Capitals of Georgia, Tbilisi 2006

2. I. Gdzelishvili, O. Tkeshelshvili, Material Monuments of Tbilisi, Tbilisi 1961

3. M. Karbelashvili, S. Kintsurashvili, N. Jamberidze, Architectural Guide to Tbilisi, Tbilisi 1958

4. Collections Rustavi I, II, II, collective authorizes, Tbilisi 1996, 1998 and 2005

5. Levan Tchilashvili, Town Rustavi, Tbilisi 1958

6. Levan Tchilashvili, Towns in Feudal Georgia I, II, Tbilisi 1968, 1970

Emission Modelling

1. “Methodology of Determination of Harmful (Pollutant) Substance Dispersions in Ambient Air

through Motor Traffic Moving on Highways”, developed by the Research Institute of

Protection of Ambient Air (Research Institute Atmosphere) of the Federal Service on

Ecological, Technological and Nuclear Supervision, 8th December, 2005, Saint-Petersburg

2. Ecologist-3, Saint-Petersburg, 2005

143

Annex 9.

Experts Participating in IEE Preparation

Paata Chankotadze

Project Manager

Andrei Kndaurov

Ekology (fauna)

Lali Akhalaia

Cultural Heritage

Mariam Kimeridze

Ekology (flora)

Baadur Ukleba

Hydrology

Irakli Kaviladze

Social Issues; Waste Management;

Environmental Agency

Samling and Laboratorial Analysis

km 10.5 to 17.1 Tbilisi-Phonichala - Early Warning System

Documents

Transcript of km 10.5 to 17.1 Tbilisi-Phonichala - Early Warning System