highlights - US Government Publishing Office

Vol. 40— 20710-24-75PAGES49765-50022

/

FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

highlightsPART kORAL CONTRACEPTiVE DRUGSHEW/FDA solicits comments on draft revision of uniformphysician labeling; comments by 11—24—75.................... 49813

CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORDSJustice/LEAA proposes revisions to collection, storage,and dissemination of information regulations; commentsby 12-5-75. ............. ____________________ ;..... ........ ................. 49789

ALIENS PAROLED INTO U.S.Justice/1 NS refuses entry under refugee programs or asylum claims to individuals guilty of discrimination; effective 11—24—7 5 ................... ................................................ 49767

STRIPPER WELL LEASESFEA proposes extending exemption amendment; comments by 1.1-4—7 5 .......... ...... ............................................. 49799

CONTINUED INSIDE

PART II:CORPORATE FUNDSFEC publishes advisory opinion on expenditures by “ Host Committees” ..... .......... ................ ........... ....................— 49881

PART III:PRIVACY ACT OF 1974The following agencies issue documents relating to the implementation of the Act and/or notices of Systems ofRecords:Agriculture Department (2 documents)----------- -------- 49886Energy Research and Development Administration.------ 49932Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation------- ---- --------- 49935General Services Administration______ ________ ___________— 49936Health, Education, and Welfare Department------ ...... . .. . 49886Transportation Department................ ....'.......... ................. .— 49887

PART IV:MINIMUM WAGESLabor/ESA issues determinations for Federal and Federally-assisted construction............................. ......................... 49939

PART V:ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIONSUSDA/FS lists projects for which statements are beingprepared ........ .................— ---------------- ;------------------ 49975

rem inders(The items in this list were editorially compiled as an aid to F ederal R egister users. Inclusion or exclusion from this list has no legal

significance. Since this list Is intended as a reminder, it does not include effective dates that occur within 14 days of publication.)

Rules Going Into Effect TodayFCC— Radio broadcast services; table of

assignments, FM broadcast stations,Oregon ......... 43028; 9-18-75

DOT/FAA— Boeing model 747 series air* s planes; airworthiness directives.

43019; 9-18-75List of Public Laws

H.R. 6151.......... ......... .. Pub. Law 94-119An act to authorize appropriations for services necessary to nonperforming arts functions of the John F. Kennedy Center(Oct. 21,1975; 89 Stat. 608)

H.R. 7706........................ Pub. Law 94-120An act to suspend the duty on natural

f, graphite until the close of June 30,1978, and for other purposes (Oct. 21,1974; 89 Stat. 609)

H.R. 8121.......................... Pub. Law 94-121Departments of State, Justice, and Commerce, the Judiciary, and. Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976 (Oct. 21, 1975; 89 Stat. 611)

H.R. 8561................. ...... Pub. Law 94-122Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976 (Oct. 21, 1975; 89 Stat. 641)

&

ATTENTION: Questions, corrections, or requests for information regarding the contents of this issue only may be made by dialing 202-523-5282. For information on obtaining extra copies, please call 202-523-5240.To obtain advance information from recorded highlights of selected documents to appear in the next issue, dial 202-523-5022.

Published daily, Monday through Friday (no publication on Saturdays, Sundays, or on official Federal » hol idays) , by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services

« l y y P L Ad m in is t r a t io n , Washington, D.C. 20408, under the Federal Register Act (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I ) . Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.

The F ederal R egister provides a uniform system for making available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Federal agencies. These Include Presidential proclamations and Executive orders and Federal agency documents having general applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published by Act of Congress and other Federal agency documents of public interest.

The F ederal R egister will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $5.00 per month or $50 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies is 75 cents for each issue, or 75 cents for each group of pages as actually bound. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. *

There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister..

j g«A

O I 8

T >J ¡ >

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

HIGHLIGHTS— Continued

DEBENTURE INTEREST RATEHUD revises scale for mortgage insurance and insuredhome improvement loans; effective 7 -1 -75 ....................... 49777

LABOR RELATIONSFederal Service Impasses Panel adopts new rules and clarifies current procedures for impasse cases; effective10-24-75 .......... . . . ......................................................... . 49765

BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTSUSDA/APHIS authorizes use of contractors to select prerelease samples....................................... ——........- —----- 49767

MUNICIPAL SECURITIESSEC adopts registration regulations for brokers and dealers „___ . -................. ~ ............... ............ ............- 49772

RABBITS, POULTRY, AND EGGSUSDA/AMS increases fees and charges for grading andinspection services; effective 11—9—75..........,............... _....' 49783

LICENSE REQUIREMENTSFCC revises eligibility criteria for public ship station applicants; effective 11—28—75...................... ......................... 49781

CHARTER TOURSCAB requires preservation of records by one-stop- inclusive operators; effective 10—16-75........ ........... . 49771

SPARK GAP IRRADIATORSNRC proposes exempting such devices containing less than 1 microcurie of cobalt-60 from licensing requirements; comments by 12—8—7 5 -............................................. 49801

DEPOSITORY ACCOUNT REPORTS CAB eliminates filing requirements for various classes of direct and indirect air carriers (7 documents); effective 10-21—75___ •..... .......... . ........... .................................... 49770-49772

MILITARY TRANSPORTATIONCAB proposes increased minimum rates for certaindomestic cargo charters; comments by 11—24—75;reply comments by 12-9-75 ................. —- ........................ 49794

ANNUAL RETAIL TRADE SURVEY Commerce/Census considers continued monitoring of sales, purchases, and inventories..... ..................................... 49811

ANTIDUMPINGTreasury determination on rechargeable sealed nickel- cadmium batteries from Japan........ ..................................... 49803

MEETINGS—HEW: National Advisory Council on Health Manpower

Shortage Areas, 11—21—75...... ................................. 49813National Commission for the Protection of Human

Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research,1 1 -1 5 -7 5 ......................... ..:........................ ................. 49815

NIH: National Arthritis, Metabolism, and Digestive Diseases Advisory Committee, 11—19 through11-21-75 ...................... :............................................. 49813

President’s Cancer Panel, 12-2-75........................ 49814interior: National Petroleum Council, Future Energy

Prospects Committee, 11-13-75............. ..................... 49810NSF: Computer Science and Engineering Advisory

Panel, 11-11 and 11-12-75............... . . . . . . . . ............ 49823International Decade of Ocean Exploration Pro

posals Review Panel, 11—11 through 11—13—75.... 49823 Postal Rate Commission: Mail Classification Sched

ule, 1973, 10^28—75-........................................ ........... 49823SEC: Report Coordinating Group (Advisory),

11-17-75 ........................................... ............................... 49824USDA/FS: Cascade Head Scenic Research Area Ad

visory Council, 11-14 and 11-15-75_____ _______ 49811State and Private Forestry Committee, 11-18

through 11-20-75.................................... .................... 49811

CANCELLED MEETING—USDA/FS: Grand Mesa National Forest Grazing Ad

visory Board, 19-22-75................................................. 49811

contentsAGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICERulesPees and charges:

Fruits and vegetables (fresh);correction____ _________ 49782

Poultry and eggs..— —__ ___ 49783Avocados grown in South Fla__ 49787Grapefruit; imported-___ _____ 49787Oranges, grapefruit, tangerines,

and tangelos grown in Fla___ 49785Limes grown in Florida____ _____ 49786Proposed RulesGrapefruit grown hi Arizona and

California ____ .___ ________ 49790Lemons grown in Arizona and

California___ _______ 1_____ 49790Lettuce grown in South Texas___ 49791Olives grown in California— — 49791 Raisins produced from grapes

grown in California_________ 49791

AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENTSee also Agricultural Marketing

Service; Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; Commodity Credit Corporation; Farmers Home Administration; Forest Service.

NoticesPrivacy Act of 1974; systems of

records (2 documents)______ 49886

ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTHINSPECTION SERVICE

RulesPlant pest regulations:

Mediterranean fruit fly---------- 49784Viruses, serums, toxins, and an

alogous products :Organisms and vectors___ — 49767

ANTITRUST DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

NoticesCompetitive impact statements

and consent judgments, U.S. versus vis ted companies:

Manufacturers Aircraft Association, et al____ —_______ 49803

CENSUS BUREAUNoticesRetail sales, purchases, and in

ventories; consideration to continue survey------------------------ 49811

CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARDRulesCharter trips and special services. 49770

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975 1U

CONTENTS-Charter trips by foreign air carri-

e r s ----------- *--------- ----- - 49771Inclusive tour charters———.:__ 49772Preservation of records— _____ 49771Study group charters. —________ 49772Terms authorizing charter trans

portation only_____ ___ ._____ 49771Terms of supplemental air trans

portation __________ 49771Travel group charters-________ 49772Proposed RulesMilitary transportation; exemp

tion of air carriers; logair andquicktrans minimum rates____ 49794

NoticesHearings, etc.:

International Air Transport Association ________ ,_____49816

COMMERCE DEPARTMENTSee Census Bureau; Maritime Ad

ministration; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM THE BLIND AND OTHER SEVERELY HANDICAPPED

NoticesProcurement list, 1975; additions

and deletions (2 documents) ___ 49816

COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATIONRulesCooperative'' marketing . associa

tions; eligibility requirementsfor price support__________ 49788

NoticesMonthly sales list for fiscal year

ending June 30, 1976——___ 49810EDUCATION OFFICENoticesMeetings:

National Advisory Council on Extension and Continuing E ducation_______________ 49815

ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION

NoticesPrivacy Act; systems of records— 49932

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL NoticesEnvironmental statements; avail- '

ability (2 documents)__ 49816, 49819

EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION

NoticesMinimum wages for Federal and

Federally assisted construction; general wage determination decisions, modifications, and supersedeas decisions___ _____ _ 49939

FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION NoticesDisaster areas:

South Dakota___ __________ 49811

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATIONRules — - Airworthiness directives:

Britten Norman Ltd__—__ 49768Litton Systems, Inc ___ 49769McDonnell Douglas_________ 49768Pressed Steel Tank Co______ 49769SIAI Marchetti_______ 49769Sikorsky___________________ 49770

Proposed RulesTransition area:_______________ 49794FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

' COMMISSION RulesDomestic public radio services;

procedural requirements, Cor-rec tio n ------------------------ 49780

FM broadcast stations; table of assignments Maryland________ 49780

Land mobile channel ; terminationof proceeding_______ __^____ 49779.

Maritime services, land and shipboard stations_1____ ____ 49781

Organization and functions :Chicago regional office-______ 49778

Proposed RulesLocal government radio service;,

transmission of certain kinds of information to traveling public. 49798

Nondiscrimination; broadcast licensees ___________________ 49799

NoticesCommon carrier services,; domestic

public radio services:Information; applications ac

cepted for filing._________ _ 49820FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE

CORPORATION NoticesPrivacy Act; additional record sys

tems ______-----__________ 49935FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION NoticesAdvisory opinion:

Expenditures of funds by “Host Committees” ___•___ ,___ ___ 49881

FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION Proposed RulesAllocation and price rules, general;

extension of stripper well lease exemption beginning November 30, 1975— ________________ 49799

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RulesOutdoor advertising control, cor

rection ___________ __ ____ 49777

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD NoticesApplications, etc.:

First financial of Virginia Corp. 49821

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION NoticesComplaint filed:

ACE Machinery Co. vs.-Hapag- Lloyd Aktiengellschaft, correction _____ ____ _____ 49821

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION NoticesJurisdictional sales of natural

g a s------.—— ______________ 49822Hearings, etc,:

Consolidated Gas Supply Corp. 49822

FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANELRulesOrganization and functions____ 19765

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Proposed Rules *Trade regulation rule:

Advertising and labeling of protein supplements— ___ 498ul

Health spâs2__j.._'-à.-2.____L'SZL 49801FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATIONNoticesUniform physician labeling for

oral contraceptive drug products; intent to solicit comments ____________________ 49813

FOREST SERVICENoticesEnvironmental^rstatements under

preparation as of September 15,1975 ------------ 49975

Meetings:Cascade Head Scenic-Research

Area Advisory Council—____ 49811Grand Mesa National Forest

Grazing Advisory Board-'—„ 49811 State and Private Forestry Advi

sory Committee-.__________ 49811

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION RulesProperty management; audit of

transportation payments; correction ___ '— i —___ ____ _ 49778

NoticesPrivacy Act; temporary regula

tions _____ __ __________ — 49936

HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE DEPARTMENT

See also Education Office; Food and Drug Administration; Health Resources Administration; Health Services Administration; National Institutes of Health.

Proposed RulesProcurement; architect/engineer

services_____ ______ _______ 49792NoticesMeeting:

Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research National Commission 49815

Privacy Act of 1974; systems ofrecords; proposed amendment_ 49886

Professional Standards Review Organization; Physician intention to enter:

Florida; announcement of results of poll_________ _____ 49814

iv FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

CONTENTS

HEALTH RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION NoticesCommittees; establishment, re

newals, etc.:National Council on Health

Planning and Development; correction________—--------49813

HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATIONNoticesMeetings:

Health Manpower Shortage Areas National Advisory Council------ ---------- — —— 49813

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

RulesDebenture interest rates— ------- : 49777

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

RujesParole into the Uiiited States of

a lien s--- ___--------- —--------— 49767

INTERIOR DEPARTMENT See Reclamation Bureau.Notices Meeting:

Future Energy Prospects National Petroleum Council Committee — 49810

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION NoticesAbandonment of services :

Chicago and North WesternTransporattion Cd____ •__ 49831

Visalia Electric Railroad Co__ 49832Car service orders :

American Short Line RailroadAssociation — __■_ 49831

Akron, Canton and YoungstownRailroad, Co., et al____ ____ 49831

Burlington Northern, Inc. andCentral Railroad Co. of N.J_ 49831

Norfolk and Western Railway Co. and Pittsburgh and LakeErie Railroad Co___ 49832

Fourth section applications for relief 49847

Hearing assignments___ ______ 49833Motor carriers:

Irregular route property carriers; gateway elimination-__ 49833

Transfer proceedings (3 documents) ________ ____ 49847, 49848

JUSTICE DEPARTMENTSee Antitrust Division; Immigra

tion and Naturalization Service.

Proposed RulesCriminal history record informa

tion; collection, storage, and dissemination------- -------------- 49789

LABOR DEPARTMENTSee also Employment Standards

Administration; Manpower Administration.

NoticesAdj ustment assistance :

Baker Clothes, Inc------------ - 49826B and G Silverman, Inc_______ 49826Cross Country Clothes, Inc___ 49827Gentry Clothing Co______— _ 49827Imperial Clothing Co_______ _ 49828Joseph H. Cohen, Inc______ 49827Louis Goldsmith, Inc___ _____ 49828Max Golden and Son, Inc___t_ 49828Middishade Co., Inc____ 49829Modem Coat Co____________ 49829Teplick Clothes, Inc_________ 49830W. Seitchik and Sons, Inc___ _ 49830

MANPOWER ADMINISTRATION Notices -Employment transfer and business

competition determinations under the Rural Development Act; applications ________ Ì______ 49826

MARITIME ADMINISTRATION NoticesApplications, etc.:

Atlantic Richfield Co________ 49812Standard specifications for diesel

merchant construction; availability ____________ ________ 49812

NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION

NoticesMotor vehicle safety standards;

temporary exemption:Carrozzeria Zagato__________ 49815

NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTHNoticesMeetings:

National Arthritis, Metabolism, and Digestive Advisory Coun-cil ______ ______ _________ 49813

President’s Cancer Panel__ _ 49814NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC

ADMINISTRATION NoticesEndangered species permit:

Northwest Fisheries Center—— 49812NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATIONNoticesMeetings:

Computer Science and Engi-neering Advisory Panel_____ 49823

International Decade of Ocean Exploration Proposal Review P a n e l _____________ 49823

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONProposed RulesByproduct material, human; ex

emption of persons using spark gap irradiators containing cobalt-60 _________________ — 49801

NoticesApplications, etc.:

Public Service Co. of NewHampshire, et al___ _______ 49823

_ Washington Public Power Supply System__J__ __ _____ 49823

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION NoticesMail Classification Schedule, 1973. 49823

POSTAL SERVICE NoticesPostage rates and fees; proposed

changes; correction _______ 49823

RECLAMATION BUREAU NoticesPower rates; general adjustments;

location change for public comment forum________________ 49810

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

RulesInvestment advisers, etc. :

Registration _______________ 49772NoticesHearings, etc. :

BBI, Inc__________________ 49824Royal Properties Inc____ 49824Saber Corp________ ;________ 49824St. Regis Paper Co___ ____ 49824

Meeting:Report Coordinating Group

(Advisory) ______________ 49824SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION NoticesApplications, etc. :

Constructs Investment Inc__ 49825Disaster areas:

New York (2 documents) __^___ 49825 V irginia_________ :______ _ 49825

TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT See also Federal Aviation Admin

istration; Federal Highway Administration; National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Proposed RulesPrivacy Act; maintenance of and

access to records__— _______ 49887TREASURY DEPARTMENT.NoticesAntidumping:

Rechargeable sealed nickel-cadmium batteries from J a p a n __ _______ ____ ___ 49803

FEDERAL REGISTER, VÓL. 40, NO. 2Ö7— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975 V

1st of cfr parts affectedThe following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today’s

issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, follows beginning with the second issue of the month.A Cumulative List of CFR Sections Affected is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected

by documents published since the revision date of each title.

5 CFR 14 CFR 28 CFR2740— ______2471_________7 CFR51____ 1 - J t___54________t___55— __________56___________70___________331___;.a$_____905— _______ _911_m________915__________944__________1425__________P roposed R ules:909— _________.910__________932__________971____989__________8 CFR212______ ____9 CFR113__________

4976549765

49782497834978349784 49784497844978549786497874978749788

497904979049791 49791 49791

49767

49767

39 (6 documents)207_____208—____ ______212____________214— _________249___________ _372a_______ ____373-----*________378____________P roposed R ules:71_288

49768-49770_____49770_____ 49771______ 49771_____49771_____49771_____ 49772____ 49772_____49772

4979449794

16 CFRP roposed Rules:443—_— ________ _k________49801454__________ ____________ _ 49801

17 CFR200____ * _240— 249__._

497764977649777

23 CFR750________:_________ _______ 49777

P roposed R ules:20—___ ________—_ _!___ _____ 49789

41 CFR101-41- ____ t____ ________49778P roposed Rules:3-4___________ _____________ 49792

47 CFR0— ______ __1________ ___ _2________________18_____________21 <2 documents)73 (2 documents)74 _______ _______ _______83—____ _______89___ _________91_____________93___________ _P roposed R ules :2___L_______ _73_____________89__ __________

______ 49778.— 49778___—_ 49779_____ 4977949779, 49780 49779, 49780._____ 49779_____ 4Ô781_____ 49779___ ÜL. 49779____ _ 49779

4979849799 49798

10 CFR 24 CFRP roposed R ules.: 203_____________________ 49777 ^ ^30___ ______ ______ *______ ___ 49801 207—————————— ——— — 49777 P roposed R ules:210--------------------- ----- — ____ 49799 220________—_______ ______ II. 49777 10_________ _______________ _ 49887

f t FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— OCTOBERThe folllowing numerical guide is a list of parts of each title of the Code of

Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during October.1 CFRCh. I________ S___}------— —— 45157Proposed Rules:

304________ _____ ____ *____488943 CFRProclamations :4262 (See Proc. 4398) — ---------- 460854397_______—-----— — ■--------- - 457914398—__ —-------- «------ ----------- 460854399 __________ ____ ------------ 460874400 ____ ___.‘¿-iiC—___ - — 483374401 _______ _____ __________ 49069Executive Orders:8684 (Revoked by EO 11886)__— 4907110016 (Revoked by EO 11884)-------4746911388 (Superseded by EO 11880) — 46089 11345 (Amended by EO 11882) — 46293 11371 (Amended by EO 11882)— 46293 11578 (Amended by EO 11882)— 4629311658 (Amended by EO 11882)— 4629311659 (Amended by EO 11882)— 4629311811 (Superseded by EO 11883)— 4709111812 (Superseded by EO 11883). 4709111832 (See Proc. 4398) „ — ----- 4608511861 (Amended by EO 11885) — 4849111880________________=---------- 4608911881—_____________________ 4629111882 ___ — — &___ —^------- 4623911883 __;___ ________________ 4709111884 _ 4746911885 _____________'________ _ 4849111886— — —_________ 49071Memorandums:Memorandum of October 10,1975. 490734 CFR51 ________ _________________- 4751152 __— ___ —______________ 4751253 ________ —_____ ____ -___ 4751354— _____ — — _____ ____ _4751355____________ ___________ — 47513400___________ 45417.412________ ___________ ___— ^45417Proposed R ules:

413............ 475175 CFR151________ 47101213 45793

47513~ 4779l" Y779~2~481lT, 48673» 48907,49295

591______ 45417735__________ — ____________ 48339890______ ______ — ____ _ 495671001___ __________.v______ —— 483392413—_____ 454172470^______ 497652471________ _ „____ — — 49765Proposed Rules:

1705____._____ —_____ — 460626 CFRProposed Rules:

704____________1_________ 478017 CFR2 ------------------ 45157, 45158, 483406------ 4849321________ 47751

7 CFR— Continued 9 CFR— Continued24 _ 4747325 __ 4849325A______ 4849351___ 46295, 47751, 48494, 48930, 4978252_____________________ 47753,4893053 ___ 4775354 ______—_____ —__________4978355 _ 4978356 ____;___ _— _____________ 4978458___________________________ 4791068_______________ 4710170__________ 49784301_______________ ____ 48935, 48936331_______________ _____ ._____49784354___________ 49575722— ___ — — _________ 48685Ch. V ili. ____i _____________ ;_ 48685905_______— __________c____ _ 49785906— — — _______________ 48340, 48494908 _ 45417, 47476, 48495, 49075, 49575909 _____________ 48494910 _______ ____ 45795, 47754,911 ______ — 49786913______ 45794915—_________ 47102, 49787924_______ ___________— — 45418927— ________— ____________ 46091930___________________*______ 45418944___ 49787948______ L________— _______ 45794966__________— _____ 47754, 48686980__________ __ ______ £, 45794, 48687989_____________________ 462991046__ _________ ____.___ _____ 451581201—___________ 460911250— _____ -________ 48496, 486881425______ 497881808___ =.___ 47477P roposed R ules:

17—________ C 4751451— _ 1— ______4611552— ___ 46116, 48949906__________ —_________ 47796909___ — 49790910 _ 49790911 ___ — ______45442929______ __________ 45443,48954932 ______ __ — _____ _ 49791971_______________49348,49791982________________ 45175984.________________________— 48518989—__________ 49097, 49791993—_____________ ;____ — 454431001 ___ 473161002 __________________ 473161015— _______ ____ — 473161207_________________ 451761251_____ 451761464________ 454441803—— —_______ — 49577

8 CFR103________- ______ -______ — 46092212__________ — _____________________________________________

9 CFR11__________ 4775478_— _________ 4579592________ 4609297____________ 46300

101—____________________ 45419, 46093112 _______________________46093, 49295113 _ 45419, 46092, 46093, 49295, 49767114 _____ _______________________ 46093307— __ *______________________ 45798331__ ____;______________________45801381_______________1______i ______45801Proposed Rules:

73____ -,_____________ 48140, 4934978___ 48697113__________j ___—_________49577

10 CFR205—________ 48111206___ &____ ______;_____________ 45609211 _ 47477, 47478, 48111, 48340, 49297212 _____________ 47755708-------------------------------------------- 45308714— _________________________ 49075715— ------------- ---- -•____ _______ 45321R ulings:1975-17—1—_______ 48341Proposed Rules:

30______ 49801205_________________ 48381210-______________________ 49799211_____________________ 47803212—___ 45447, 47147, 49105, 49372213_______________________ 48948

11 CFRP roposed R ules:

107___109-111_____116______ __.130 _______131 _______132—_____133___

12 CFR7_____ —: ______202__ __________204____ ________217__—____—226_____ :_______261a____________265_______ —310_______ _____329_____________335 __ _________336 _______ —524_____________541___ _________544 ___________545 ___________555—___________561—__ ________563— _________564— _____569_____________571___ _________581 ___________.582 _______ — ,582a____________582b____ _______614—___________615__ __________619___ _________720_____________

_____ 45297_____ 47146_____ 4768847688.4870047688.48700 47688, 48700 47688, 48700

______ 4907749298

46301," 48499~ 49310------------------ 46301___ :___ 46301___—_______ 45617____________ 46093____________ 46274______ 46301, 47757_________ 47346____________ 48499_____________ 46302____________ 49310___—_______ 49311_____ 47103, 49310____________ 47103____ _____•___ 46094_____ 46094, 46303____________ 46095______ -____ 46095.____________ 46096____________ 49312____________ 49312____________ 49312____________ 49312___________ 49078________ 49078___________ 49078____________ 46276

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975 Vil

FEDERAL REGISTER12 CFR— Continued Proposed Rules:

545_ J______________ 47149, 47150555_______________________ 47151563___________ 46323571_____ ____________ ___ _ 47151

13 CFR102____________ ________46280, 48907123_________ -____ _____ j.____ 47480307________________ 49078309-___________ _____________ 49078500_______L_____ — _________48112510„___ _____ _____ ____ —___ 48113520_________ 48113530_________ 48114540________ 48115550—— — ._________ 48116560_____ 48116580____ 4811714 CFR39____ ______ ______ — —____ 45420,

45802, 46097, 46303, 47103, 48118,' 48499-48501, 48907-48911, 49092- 49094, 49567, 49768-49770

71________________—2______ _ 45158,45420, 45803, 45804, 46097, 46304- 46306, 47104, 47481, 47482, 48118- 48120, 48501, 48911, 49094, 49095, 49567

73_______ _________ 48504,46097, 4850175________— _____________46306, 4748297__________________45421,48120, 49568103_____ — _________— _______48466121______ - ____L____________ 49095207 ______ — 2— ______________ 49770208 __ — ___________________ 49771212______ ______________________49771214__________—_________________ 49771217_______ — ____ — 2.-____ 48502241________ ____________________48502249____ ___— ___ Ti___ _________ 49771288______________- ______________ 46098298___ _________________________48122372a_________ — — — ____ ___— 49772373— ______ _____— — — ____49772378____ —__________________ ____497721204_____ :u.__— _____ 48121Proposed Rules:

1 __________________________ i 4779421__________________________ 4779423____ — — ___ — —— 4779425________ 2_— 47794, 4869927______ 4779429___ — 4779431___ 4779433___________________________477943 5 477943 9 IIIIIIIIIIIIII 4632ol 4632ll 4851943________ — _________47794, 4869945_____ x— — — — ___ 4779463— —____ ______— ____4869965_____ — ———— —_____ 4869971____ — ___—______- __ - 45846,

46116, 46321, 47141, 48141, 48142, 48520, 48939, 49100, 49101, 49794

75__ .—— x „ __ 45192, 48939, 4957791-__ _________________—— 48699103— _—— — x___________45197105__ _________—— ______ — 48699121—_____ 47794,48699123_____ 48699127—_______ ——_______ 48699133- &___ ____—- ____ — — 48699

14 CFR— Continue^Proposed Rules—Continued

135_________________________ 48699137____ 48699143__ ______________________ 48699145___________ 48699147_______________ 48699159_____ „ ________ __— — 49577183___ —____________________48699217_______ ____._ 46321, 49579241_________________ 46321, 49579288_________ — _____ 49794

15 CFR4b___ _________i________ _______ 45619369— —__ 454213 7 0 - — _______ 45159377____:________________________451592005— —______ 4_____ _______— 48331Proposed Rules:

3_____ _'____— _____________ 477974b________________________— 45832

16 CFR13_________ —______x__________ 46306,

46308, 47757, 47759, 47760, 49079, ^ 49080,49569

435__________ .— _______________ 494921009____ _____1—_____________— 474821109_____________________________48122P roposed Rules:l 302____________ __________ 49536v 443_______ _____— _________49801

454_____ 4__ 4980117 CFR1 __________________ — 48688200____________ _:_______1 46107, 49776210 ____ ______________— 46111, 48359211 ____________________ ______ 48359240_________ 45422, 45853, 46111, 49776249____ ,____ 45422, 46111, 49312, 49777271 ____________________45424, 49080275— ___ 1____ _____—______—_ 45162Proposed Rules:

Ch. I ___ ——____________ 49360200— _______________________48142231_____ 48526240-i._____ _____ 45203, 45448, 48142241_____________ 48526249_____ ___________—______46118275________— — ________46118

18 CFR2 _________________- _____________4957135________ —_ _____— x_______ 48673141__—_________ ._—____________49573260____ —___,,_____ _____________49573301_______ ___________________ — 45313701___________________T___ —____ 45675

19 CFR10__________ ——__ __________ 47761201_________— x_________ ___ 47976210___________ — 45163P roposed R ules:

1___ 47795, 48139141- _—_____________ 45825142— — ___ — 45825143___________ __________ _ 45825159________ ——__________ 45825162___—_____ 48690201™__— __________ ,-x_ 48700210_____ 48700

20 CFR404 __________405 _____ i___416__________ _P roposed R ules:

200________ ¿I410__ ‘J____416——___ _

__________ _ 45805______ ____ 4630947487, 47761, 48911

457364519948937

21 CFR121----------------------------------- 46099,

47104, 48675, 49080, 49082 49573123--------------------------------------- 45163201---------------------- 46099310-------------- 1---------------48918, 49574331--------------------------- 48343369-------------------------------46100, 48919436---------------------------------- 45426440--------------------------------------- 49083442------------------ 49083452— ______ 49083520— _-------------- — 45164, 46101, 48676522-----------------46101, 48502, 48676524_____ — ________ _______ _ 48676529_-------------- i — — ________ 48676558--- x---------------------------- 45164561------------- ---------------- 45163, 451651301__________________ 48344P roposed R ules:

4 „ _ 7— 210 -

225_ 310_. 330_ 610- 660_ 1301

451904519047516475164836249097463184631847514

22 CFR6_____,6a_____215—505___707— .

_____ 4850345606, 47419 —— 45679 — 49278 _____ 46284

23 CFRCh. I ---- ——--------- — 4_____ _ 45805633—__ 49084750------- ---------- — ___ ______ 4977724 CFR15--------i.----------------------------- 4812325— .....................—— _______ 4891982----------------------------------47792, 48677203— ----- 47105, 49777205------- ----- c ,__________ ____ 47105207— ------------- 47105, 49777213—------------------- 47105220 --------- 47105, 49777221 ___ _____ _____ i —_______47106232----------------- ----- „____ _____ 47106234______________________ —— 47106235— __ 47106236_;------- .x____________________47106241 -- :---------------------- ---------- 47106242 ---------------------------------- 47106244_____—___________ ________ 47106403___ ________ _______ 1 ______ 493181914------------------ :___________ 45805,

48355,48359, 48503,48677, 49313 1915— — 45806, 46102, 48504, 493151916______________ 46165, 46166, 481261917—___— ___________ 48127, 48128

Viil FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

FEDERAL REGISTER

24 CFR— Continued1920____________________ —— 45166,

45167, 48128-48133, 48357-48359, 49089

Proposed R ules:280_____________________ 48141888____________________ „454451917_________ 48362, 490992700_____________________ 476942705____________ 476942710__________ 476942715____ 476942720______ 476942725_____________ 47694

25 CFR221__ 45427, 46114Proposed Rules:

113---------- _______ 47795221____________________________ 47139

26 CFRI ____________ _ 45427, 48508, 49321II ____________________ 45810,

45812, 47107, 48345, 48508, 48679, 49326

20_________ 4932325_-------------------------------- 4932331_____ 48346301________ 49323Proposed Rules :

1_____:__________________ 45442,45828, 45832, 45838, 45845, 46314, 47138, 48361, 48514, 48690, 48691, 49343

53------------__------ r__— ___ 48696

27 CFR245_.______ _____________ 47490, 48920

28 CFR55--------------------------------------- 46080

230---------- 47522390_______________________48520393__________ 48520567 ------------------------------- 45847568 ----------- ------- -----____ 45847571„_________ 45200, 45847, 471411033____ 45450

P roposed R ules:20_____________ *,___ _____ 49789

29 CFR94--- ---------------------- a___ _ 4772297--------------------------___:_______ 47722102---------------- ----------------___ 483301410---------- 474I81952__________ 495741953— ----------------------- 486792555_____ 474912605------------------------ 477652607--------------------- 46054Proposed Rules:

8------------------- 4631697_---------------- 477441910----------- 45934,

46206, 47262, 47652, 48362, 48814, 49032

1952 -----45855, 47515, 47516, 495811953 ----------------------------- 491012520----- 48096

30 CFR400________ -_____ _■_____ _____ 46309P roposed Rules:

211___ 4631531 CFR1 _______ ________ ____ 45684, 49089128_________ _._______________ 46101210_______ 47492306__________ 47979341_________ 47979346_______ 47979515 ___rL,____________ ^__— 47108P roposed R ules:

12___ 4934332 CFR1460_________ 461021622_____________ 454361814__________ 460551901_____________ 453222102______________ 47746P roposed Rules:

701_________________;___v_'_ 4606033 CFR2 ___ ___ ____ — _____ _____ 493263—— ____ 45167100—— _-_------------------------ 49326117---- 49327127_________ 45168-45169, 47108151_____________________ 48280157_.-------------------- 48280, 49328204 ------„ ,_______ ____________48511205 ___ 48511207_________ 47495P roposed R ules:

117___________ ._____ 45191,48363157----------- 48289, 49351

34 CFR236___ 4834635 CFR51--------- 4630936 CFRP roposed Rules:

7------ 458451002___ 45306

38 CFR0-------------- ___------ --------462863— ____ ______ _________ 45169,486798-1------------------------ 483488-7------------ 48348Proposed Rules:

3_______ 45853, 45854, 48143, 4958039 CFR261 ------ ------- ----------------45721, 48511262 ----------------------- 45722263 ------------------------ 45722264_-------- 45723266— ---------- ----------------45723, 48512267 ---- --------------------- - 45726,48512268 _ 45726447-------------------- ;_________ __ 45726601___ 4710840 CFR51 ____ 4624052 ____ 45817,

45818, 46310, 47495, 47765, 48680 48680, 49328

40 CFR— Continued60 __________ 45170, 46250, 4834761 ___________ 45171, 48292, 48347180___ 46310, 48133, 48680, 48681, 49575407__________ 49222421_____ 48348434____ 48830436___________ 48652P roposed R ules:

6_____ 4771451 _________ 4904852 _ _ 45202

46117, 46322~ 47519, 48521, 48941,’ 48942, 49103,49362

85_____ 1 49496, 49517140___ 47972180_________________ 46322, 48940407______________________ 49237434_______________________48839436___________ 48665

41 CFRCh. 5_______________________ 47109Ch. 5B_________ 47109Ch. 9_________ 1____ __ 46802, 474951-1-------------------- 483261-7___________________ 483141-10___________________ 48314, 489201-18__ 4832714-3__________ _____ :_________ 4713614-55___________ 1__________ _ 45818101-6________________________ 49328101-11________________________ 48134101-32________________ 48135, 49329101-39_______________________ 49331101-40______ -________________ 49331101-41_____ ;_________ _ 47944, 49778P roposed R ules:

3-4_________ 497929-9___ 4836350-250___________________ 49351

42 CFR52e_______r___ _____________ 4909053____ 46202306_____ 47765P roposed Rules:

122_’______ 4880243 CFR4____________________________ 463103300— _________ :________ ____ 45171P ublic Land Order:5543_____ 47496P roposed Rules:

3041_____ 4631545 CFR122________________ 47767144_________ 49270166------------ 49532175---------------------------------------- 49271176_— _______________________ 49272220 ------------------------------------- 45818221 _____ __________________ 45818222—__________ 45818224---------------------------------------- 45818226— _____ 45818228____________________ : 45818, 45819706__________________________ 457261005 ________________________458201006 ________________ 45300, 474191076_________________________ 454361115__________________ 49286

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975 lx

FEDERAL REGISTER45 CFR— Continued 47 CFR— Continued 49 CFR—ContinuedP roposed R ules:

81_______■________________ 45442116c____________ 49349144_______ 48252175______________________ 48266205____ 48937

46 CFR42------------------------- L________ 48287146------ ______________________48466193______ 48349536_________ 47770P roposed Rules:

111_____ 47140502___ 49579

47 CFR0 _____ _____________ 45823, 497781 --------------- :___ 47136, 48135, 497782-_________ 48922,4977918--------------- 4977921-----;____________ 47496,49779, 4978073 --------- 47136,

48349, 49332-49339, 49779, 4978074 _________________________4977976_______ 4892883— _____ 49781

89___________________ 48136, 4977991__________ 4977993____ 49779P roposed Rules:

2___________________48380,4979873_ 45850, 48525, 48944, 48945, 4979974_______________________ 4752276__________ 47521, 4894678_______________ 4752283_"_______________ 4585087__ 4838089_____ 47522, 49798

49 CFR10_____ 45729117__________ 49092177_._____ 45824, 46106107_-------------------- 48470170______ 48774171_.--------- 48474393__----------------------- 49340501— ------------- ;_ 48350571----- 47789, 47790, 48350, 48512, 49340932---------------------- 457341033____--------45174, 45440, 48512, 489301037— -------- 493411115--------- 47504

1241_________________________ 485121249 _______________ 485121250 _ 485121251_________ 48512P roposed R ules:

10__________ 49887103______ 45197177___________ 45847192—__________ ____ 45192, 48940195__ !__________ 48940

50 CFR17------------------------------------ ---- 4750520______ __ ______ 46311, 47137,4868232__ 45440,

* 45824, 46106, 46311-46313, 47506,47791, 48137, 48138, 48513, 48683,49092

33__— ____ 46313,.4750981------------------- 47509280________ ._____ 47791, 48684, 48685285__________ ___ 45441, 45824, 46313501---------------------------1_______ 49276P roposed Rules:

17--------- 45175, 48139, 49347, 49348280______ 47139

FEDERAL REGISTER PAGES AND DATES— OCTOBERPages Date45157-45415.45417-45789-45791-46083-46085-46290-46291-47090-47091-47468-47469-47749-47751-48110-48111-48335-48337-48489-48491-48672-48673-48905-48907-49067-49069-49293-49295-49566-49567-49764-49765-50022.

123678 9

10141516 17 20 21 222324

K FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975L

49765

rules end regulationsThis section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect most of which are

keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under SO titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL

REGISTER issue of each month.

Title 5— Administrative PersonnelCHAPTER XIV— FEDERAL LABOR RELA

TIONS COUNCIL; FEDERAL SERVICESIMPASSES PANEL

SUBCHAPTER C— FEDERAL SERVICES IMPASSES PANEL

PART 2470— GENERALPART 2471— PROCEDURES OF THE

PANELOn July 28, 1975, there was published

in the F ederal R egister (40 FR 3i636) a notice of proposed amendments of rules concerning the procedures of the Panel. Interested persons were invited to submit their written comments or suggestions within 20 days after publication of such notice. All relevant matter which was submitted has been carefully considered, and the Panel has decided to adopt the proposed amendments as set forth below.

Accordingly, the Panel amends Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Sub- chapter C of Chapter XTV, to read as follows:

Subpart A— Purpose1. Section 2470.1 is revised as follows:

§ 2470.1 Purpose.The regulations contained in this sub-

chapter are intended to implement the provisions of sections 5 and 17 of Executive Order 11491 of-October 29,1969, as amended, entitled “Labor-Management Relations in the Federal Service.” They prescribe procedures and methods which the Federal Service Impasses Panel utilizes in the resolution of negotiation impasses when the parties negotiating a labor agreement have failed to reach a full settlement by mediation or other voluntary arrangements.

Subpart B— Definitions2. Section 2470.2 is revised as follows:

§ 2470.2 Definitions.(a) The following definitions are used

in this subchapter:(1) “Executive Secretary” means the

Executive Secretary of the Panel.(2) “Factfinder(s) ” means a desig

nated representative of the Panel acting in its behalf irt-the capacity of a hearing official charged with the responsibility of assembling the facts and positions of the parties to an impasse. The factfinder may be a Panel Member, a staff member, or other individual designated by the Panel.

(3) “Impasse” means that point in the. negotiation of a labor agreement at which the parties are unable to reach full agreement, notwithstanding their having made earnest efforts to reach agreement by direct negotiations and by

the use of mediation or other voluntary arrangements for settlement.

(4) “Order” means Executive Order 11491 of October 29, 1969, as amended, entitled “Labor-Management Relations in the Federal Service.”

(5) “Panel” means the Federal Service Impasses Panel or a quorum thereof.

(6) “Party” means the Federal agency, establishment or activity, or the labor organization, as defined in sections 2 (a) and (e) of the order, participating in the negotiation of a labor agreement.

(7) “Quorum” means three or more members of the Panel.

(8) “Voluntary arrangements” means those methods adopted by the parties for the purpose of assisting them in their negotiation of a labor agreement, which include utilization of <i) the services of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service; or (it) other third-party mediation assistance; or (iii) joint factfinding committees without recommendations; or (iv) referral to a higher authority within the agency and/or the labor organization; or (v) any other method which the parties deem appropriate except third-party factfinding with recommendations, or arbitration, unless said factfinding or arbitration is expressly authorized or directed by the Panel.

(b) Terms defined in the order are used in this part with the meaning attached to them in the order.

Part 2471 is revised in its entirety as follows:Sec.2471.1 Who may initiate.2471.2 What to file.2471.3 Request form.2471.4 Where to file.2471.5 Copies and service.2471.6 Initial procedures of the Panel.2471.7 Negotiability questions.2471.8 Use of third-party factfinding with

recommendations, or arbitration.2471.9 Pactfinding determination by the

Panel; notice of prehearing conference and formal hearing.

2471.10 Prehearing conference.2471.11 Authority Of factfinder(s).2471.12 Availability of hearing transcript.2471.13 Report of the factfinder(s) and

action by the Panel.2471.14 Duties of each party.2471.15 Settlement action by the Panel.2471.16 Inconsistent labor agreement pro

visions.Au t h o r it y : 5 U.S.C. 3301, 7301; E.67 11491,

3 CFR 1969 Comp., p. 191, 34 FR 17605; as amended by E.O. 11616, 3 CFR 1971 Comp., p. 202, 36 FR 17319; E.O. 11636, 3 CFR 1971 Comp., p. 232, 36 FR 24901; and E.O. 11838, 40 FR 5743 and 7391.§ 2471.1 Who may initiate.

(a) When an impasse occurs during the course of labor agreement negotiations, either party, or the parties jointly,

may request the Panel to consider the matter by filing a request as hereinafter provided.

(b) The Panel may, upon the request of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, undertake the consideration of an impasse when such mediation assistance has failed and neither party has requested the Panel's consideration.

(c> The Panel may, upon the request of the Executive Secretary, undertake the consideration of a matter which has reached impasse and where neither party has requested the Panel’s consideration.§2471.2 What to file.

A request from a party or parties to the Panel for’consideration of an impasse must be in writing and include the following essential information:

(a) Identification of the parties and person(s) authorized to initiate the request;

(b) Statement that an impasse has beeiii reached;

(c) Statement of issue(s) a t impasse and the position(s) of the initiating party or parties with respect to those issues; and

(d) The nature and extent of all voluntary arrangements utilized.§ 2471.3 Request form.

FSIP Form 1 has been prepared for use by the parties in filing a request to the Panel for consideration of an impasse. Copies are available upon request to the Office of the Executive Secretary.§ 2471.4 Where to file.

Requests to the Panel provided for in this part, and inquiries or correspondence on the status of impasses or other related matters, should be directed to the Executive Secretary, Federal Service Impasses Panel, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, D.C. 20415.§ 2471.5 Copies and service.

Any party submitting a request for Panel consideration and any party submitting a response to such request shall serve a copy simultaneously on the other party to the dispute and on any mediation facility which may have been utilized and shall file a statement of such service with the Executive Secretary. When the Panel acts on its own motion, it will notify the parties to the dispute and any mediation facility which may have been utilized.§ 2471.6 Initial procedures of the Panel.

(a) Upon receipt of a request for consideration of an impasse, the Panel will initiate an informal inquiry covering the issue(s) and the positions of the parties thereon, and will consult when necessary

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

49766 RULES AND REGULATIONSwith the parties and the mediation facility utilized, if any, and then determine whether to:

(1) Dismiss the request; or(2) Direct that negotiations be re

sumed; or(3) Direct that negotiations be re

sumed with mediation assistance;- or(4) Authorize other voluntary arrange-'

ments for settlement; or(5) Direct the impasse to factfinding;

or(6) Take any other action it deems

'appropriate.(b) The parties will be promptly ad

vised in writing of the Panel’s initial determination.§ 2471.7 Negotiability questions.

(a) If, in connection with the consideration of an impasse, a contention has been made that a proposal is contrary to law, regulation, controlling agreement, or the order and therefore is not negotiable, the Panel may in its discretion take any of the following actions a t any stage of its procedures with respect to said proposal, while the merits of the remaining proposals, if any, may be considered by the Panel:

(1) Request the parties to resolve a question involving interpretation of a controlling agreement at a higher agency level under the procedures of the controlling agreement or, if no such procedures exist, under appropriate agency regulations; or

(2) Request the parties to refer a question of negotiability which arose at a local level to the head of the agfency for determination; or

C3) Refer a question of negotiability to the Federal Labor Relations Council for decision, or advise the labor organization that it may appeal a question of negotiability to the Council for decision, when a labor organization (i) disagrees with an agency head’s determination that a proposal would violate applicable law, regulation of appropriate authority outside the agency, or the order, or (ii) contends that an agency’s regulations, as interpreted by the agency head, in its determination, violate applicable law, regulation of appropriate authority outside the agency, or the order, or are not otherwise applicable to bar negotiations under section 11(a) of the order because they do not meet the criteria established in Part 2413 of the Council’s rules or because they were not issued at the agency headquarters level or at the level of a primary national subdivision.

(b) In making a referral to the Council as described in paragraph (a) (3) of this section, the Panel will submit:

(1) The proposal in dispute;(2) The agency head’s determination

thereon;(3) The labor organization’s request

for an exception if required by § 2411.22(b) of the Council’s rules, and the agency head’s denial of that request;

(4) A statement of position with supporting evidence and argument from each party on the negotiability question; and

(5) Any other appropriate documents of record.

(c) Upon receipt of a decision of the Council that a proposal is negotiable, based upon a question of negotiability referred to the Council by the Panel, the Panel’s report to the parties will include the Council’s negotiability decision. If warranted, the Panel may refer the proposal to the parties for negotiations.

(d) Upon receipt of a decision of the Council that a proposal is not negotiable, based upon a question of negotiability referred to the Council by the Panel, the Panel will cease to give any further consideration to the proposal and so inform the parties.

(e) The Panel will not make any referrals to the Council under this section when:

(1) The negotiability issue (s) are thè only issue (s) at impasse and they arose prior to the filing of the request to the Panel; or

(2) The labor organization has not requested the Panel in writing to make such a referral; or

(3) An agency head determination is pending or issued prior to the filing of the request to the Panel; or /

(4) A petition for the review of an agency head determination is pending before the Council; or

(5) An agency head determination was issued after the filing of the request to the Panel, and the labor organization’s written request to the Panel to refer the negotiability issue (s) to the Council did not meet the requirements stated in § 2411.24 of the Council’s rules.§ 2471.8 Use of third-party factfinding

with recommendations, or arbitration.

The parties may resort to third-party factfinding with recommendations, or arbitration, to resolve an impasse, only when authorized or directed by the Panel, and provided the parties have:

(a) Made a joint request to the Panel in writing'for such authority;

(b) Agreed upon what issue(s) are at impasse;

(c) Agreed on the method of selecting the third party;

(d) Agreed upon an arrangement for paying the cost of the proceedings; and

(e) Used without success any other arrangement for settlement.§ 2471.9 Factfinding determination by

the Panel; notice of prehearing conference dnd formal hearing.

(a) When the Panel determines that resolution of an impasse requires factfinding it will :

(1) Appoint one or more factfinders to investigate the dispute; and

(2) Issue and serve,, upon each of the parties, a notice of prehearing conference, when scheduled, and of formal hearing.

(b) The notice will state:(1) Names of the parties to the dis

pute;

(2) Date, time, place, and purpose of the prehearing conference;

(3) Date, time, and place of the formal hearing;

(4) Name(s) of the factfinder(s) appointed by the Panel; and

(5) Issues to be resolved.§ 2471.10 Prehearing conference.

A prehearing conference may be held by the factfinder prior to the factfinding hearing to:

(a) Inform the parties of the purpose of the hearing and the procedures under which it will take place;

(b) Explore the possibilities of obtaining stipulations of fact;

(c) Clarify the positions of the parties with respect to the issues to be heard, including claims concerning negotiability, if any; and

(d) Discuss any other relevant matters which will help achieve the objectives of the hearing.§ 2471.11 Authority of factfinder (s).

Factfinder(s), when conducting hearings, shall have the authority to:

(a) Take testimony, including depositions;

(b) Conduct the hearing in open session. The hearing may be conducted in closed session at the discretion of the factfinder(s), however, for good cause shown by either of the parties;

(c) Rule on motions, and requests for appearance of witnesses and the production of records;

(d) Designate the date on which posthearing briefs, if any, shall be submitted. An original and two copies of each brief shall be submitted to the Executive Secretary with a copy to the other party and á statement of service; and

(e) Determine all procedural mattersof the hearing as to length of sessions conduct of persons in attendance, recesses, continuances, and adjournment; and take any other appropriate action which, in the factfinder’s judgment, will promote the purpose and objectives of the hearing. “ '§ 2471.12 Availability of hearing tran

script.The parties will make their own ar

rangements with the reporter for the purchase of their copies of the official transcript of a factfinding proceeding. A copy will be available for examination at the Office of the Executive Secretary.§ 2471.13 Report of the factfinder(s)

and action by the Panel.(a) The factfinder(s) shall prepare a

report which will not include recommendations for settlement but which will include, to the éxtent appropriate:

(1) The history of the current negotiations, including the initial positions of the -parties, and a report of items agreed to in whole or part;

(2) The positions of the parties with respect to the unresolved issues and the efforts made to reach agreement thereon;

(3) The context within which the negotiations have taken place;


■h

RULES AND REGULATIONS 49767

(4) The justification for each proposal as advanced by the parties;

(5) The prevailing practices, if any,pertaining to conditions of employment for other public employees in comparable work situations; -

(6) The status of any claim concerning negotiability; and

(7) Any other matters relevant to the impasse.

(b) The report of the factfinder (s) will be submitted to the Panel and simultaneously to the parties within a period which normally will not exceed 20 cal- ) endar days after receipt of the transcript or after receipt of briefs, if any. The parties will have 10 calendar days after receipt of the report to file written comments thereon with the Executive Secretary.

(c) Any party filing written comments on the report of the factfinder (s) shall serve a copy simultaneously on the other party in the dispute and shall file a statement of service with the Executive Secretary.

(d) After receipt of the report of the factfinder(s) and the parties’ written comments, if any, the Panel will evaluate the impasse and either;

(1) Submit its recommendations for settlement to the parties; or

(2) Take any other action which it deems appropriate.§ 2471.14 Duties of each party. ,

(a) Within 20 calendar days after receipt of a Panel Report and Recommendation^) for Settlement, each party shall, after conferring with the other, either:

(1) Accept the Panel’s recommendations and so notify the Executive Secretary; or

(2) Reach a settlement of all unresolved issues and submit a written settlement statement to the Executive Secretary; or

(3) . Submit a written statement to the Executive Secretary setting forth the reasons for not accepting the Panel’s recommendations and reaching a settlement of all unresolved issues.

(b) A reasonable extension of the 20- day period may be authorized by the Executive Secretary for good cause shown when requested in writing by either party prior to the expiration of the 20-day period.

(c) Any party submitting a notification, statement, or request to the Executive Secretary under this section shall serve a copy simultaneously on the other party to the dispute and shall file a statement of such service with the Executive Secretary.§ 2471.15 Settlement action by the Panel.

In the event there remain any unresolved Issues a t the end of the aforesaid 20-day period or any extension thereof, the Panel, after due consideration of the responses of the parties, will take whatever action it deems necessary to bring the dispute to settlement.

§ 2471.16 Inconsistent labor agreement provisions.

Any provisions of the parties’ labor agreements relating to impasse resolution which are inconsistent with the provisions of either sections 5 and 17 of the order or the procedures of the Panel shall

*be deemed to be superseded by the order and the procedures herein, unless such provisions are permitted under section 24 of the order.

Effective date. Part 2470 and Part 2471 shall be effective October 24, 1975.

For the Panel.Jacob Seidenberg,

Chairman.[FR Doc.76-28647 Filed 10-28-76;8:45 am]

Title 8—Aliens and NationalityCHAPTER I— IMMIGRATION AND NATU

RALIZATION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

PART 212— DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS: NONIMMIGRANTS; WAIVERS; ADMISSION OF CERTAIN INADMISSIBLE ALIENS; PAROLE

Parole Into United States of AliensReference is made to the notice of pro

posed rule making which was published in the F ederal R egister of July 8, 1975 (40 FR 28614) pursuant to section 553 of Title 5 of the United States Code (80 Stat. 383) and in which there were set forth the proposed amendments of 8 CFR 212.5 to provide that no alien shall be paroled into the United States under a refugee program or under a claim of asylum pursuant to 8 CFR Part 108 if he has ordered, assisted or participated in the persecution of any person because of race, religion or political opinion, or if he refuses to make a sworn statement with respect thereto.

The single representation which was received in response to the proposed rules of July 8, 1975, has been consideredrNo change has been made in the proposed rules.. The proposed rules, as set forth below, are hereby adopted:

In Part 212, § 212.5 is revised in its entirety to read as follows:§ 212.5 Parole of aliens into tbe United

States.(a) General. The district director in

charge of a port of entry may, prior to examination by an immigration officer, or subsequent to such examination and pending a final determination of admissibility in accordance with sections 235 and 236 of the Act and this chapter, or after a finding of inadmissibility has been made, parole into the United States temporarily in accordance with section 212(d) (5) of the Act any alien applicant for admission a t such port of entry under such terms and conditions, including the exaction of a bond on Form 1-352, as such officer shall deem appropriate. No alien shall be paroled into the United States under a refugee program or under a claim of asylum pursuant to Part 108 of

this chapter, if he has ordered, assisted or participated in the persecution of any person because of race, religion or political opinion, or if he refuses to make a sworn statement with respect thereto.

(b) Termination of parole. At the expiration of the period of time or upon accomplishment of the purpose for which parole was authorized or when in the opinion of the district director in charge of the area in which the alien is located that neither emergency nor public interest warrants the continued presence of the alien in the United States, parole shall be terminated upon written notice to the alien and he shall be restored to the status which he had a t the time of parole, and further inspection or hearing shall be conducted under section 235 or 236 of the Act and this chapter, or any order of exclusion and deportation previously entered shall be executed. If the exclusion order cannot be executed by deportation within a reasonable time, the alien shall again be released on parole unless in the opinion of the district director the public interest requires that the alien be continued in custody.

(c) Advance authorization. When parole is authorized for an alien who will travel to the United States without a visa, the alien shall be issued Form 1-512. (Sec. 103, 66 Stat. 173; (8 U.S.C. 1103))

Effective date: In accordance with the provisions of section 553 of Title 5 of the United States Code (80 Stat. 383), this order shall become effective November 24, 1975.

Dated: October 20,1975.L. F. Chapman, Jr.,

Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization.

[FR Doc.75-28710 Filed 10-23-75; 8:46 am]

Title 9— Animals and Animal ProductsCHAPTER I— ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH

INSPECTION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

SUBCHAPTER E— VIRUSES, SERUMS, TOXINS, AND ANALOGOUS PRODUCTS: ORGANISMS AND VECTORS

PART 113— STANDARD REQUIREMENTSSelection of Prerelease Samples of

Biological Products• Purpose: To authorize the use of a

contractor to select prerelease samples of biological products. •

Pursuant to the authority contained in the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act of March 4, 1913 (21 U.S.C. 151-158), Part 113, Subchapter E, Chapter I of Title 9 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended to include a contractor of the Department in the list of people eligible to select prerelease samples of biological products for testing by the Department. These amendments also authorize the contractor and Department personnel to forward or deliver such samples to the Veterinary Services Laboratories.

I t has been administratively determined that to contract the selection of


49768such samples shall be economically advantageous to the Department.

Section 113.3 (a) and (c) are amended to read:§ 113.3 Sampling of biological products.

id * * * *(a) Either an employee of the Depart

ment of Agriculture, of the licensee, or of the permittee, as designated by the Deputy Administrator, or a person under contract with the Department shall select prerelease samples of biological product in the number prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section. Each sample shall be marked for identification by the person making the selection after which they shall be packaged by the licensee or permittee, as the case may be, and forwarded to the Veterinary Services Labo-' ratories; except that an employee or contractor of the Department may forward or deliver the samples to Veterinary Services Laboratories if such action is deemed advisable by the Deputy Administrator.

* * * * *(c) Reserve samples shall be selected

from each serial and subserial of every biological product. Such samples shall be selected a t random from finished product by an employee of the Department, of the licensee, or of the permittee, as designated by the Deputy Administrator or a person under contract with the Department.

* * * * *(37 Stat. 832-833; (»1 U.S.C. 151-158))

These amendments make administrative changes to clarify questionable procedures and to authorize needed actions without making other substantive changes In the regulations. In order to be of maximum benefit, they must be made effective immediately.

Accordingly, under the administrative procedure provisions in 5 U.S.C. 553, it is found upon good cause that notice and other public procedure concerning these amendments are impracticable and unnecessary, and good cause is found for making these amendments effective less than 30 days after publication in the F ederal R egister.

The foregoing amendments shall become effective upon issuance.

Done at Washington, D.C., this 16th day of October 1975.

E. A. S chilf,Acting Deputy Administrator,

Veterinary Services Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

[FR Doc.75-28658 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

Title 14— Aeronautics and SpaceCHAPTER I— FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN

ISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

{Docket No. 15059; Amdt. 39-2407]PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVESBritten Norman Ltd. Model BN-2A Mark III

AirplanesThere has been a report of a failure

of the rudder trim jack lower mounting bracket on Britten Norman Ltd. Model BN-2A Mark HE airplanes that could re-

RULES AND REGULATIONSsuit in loss of the rudder trim control of the airplane. Since this condition is likely to exist or develop in other airplanes of the same type design, an airworthiness directive is being issued to require an inspection, replacement, if necessary, and reinforcement of specified parts of the rudder structure of Britten Norman Ltd. Model BN-2A Mark III airplanes.

Since this situation requires immediate adoption of this regulation, it is found that notice and public procedure hereon are impracticable and good cause-exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 ( 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423); sec. 6(c), Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(C )))

In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (14 CFR 11.89), § 39.13 of Part 39 of’the Federal Aviation Regulations is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:Britten N orman Ltd. Applies to Model BN- 2A Mark III airplanes, all series, certificated in all categories.

Compliance is required as indicated, unless already accomplished.

To prevent possible loss of rudder trim control, accomplish the following:

(a) Prior to the first flight of each day.after the effective date of this AD, inspect the rudder trim jack lower mounting brackets and rudder structure for cracks in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 of Britten Norman Service Bulletin No. BN—2/SB.62, dated June 22, 1973, or an FAA-approved equivalent.

(b) If a crack is found during an inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD, replace the cracked part with a part of the same part number or an FAA-approved equivalent before further flight, except that the airplane may be flown in accordance with FAR §§ 21.197 and 21.199 to a base where the repair can be accomplished.

(c) Within the next 300 hours* times ia service after the effective date of this AD, modify the rudder trim Jack lower mounting bracket and the rudder structure in accordance with Britten Norman Modification Leaflet No. BN—2/NB/M596, dated June 22, 1973, or an FAA-approved equivalent.

(d) Upon incorporation of the modification required by paragraph (c) of this AD, the inspections required by paragraph>-(a) of this AD, may be discontinued.

This amendment becomes effective November 5, 1975.

Issued in Washington, D.C. on October 14, 1975.

J. A. Ferrarese,Acting Director,

Flight Standards Service.[FR Doc.75-28644 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 am]

{Docket No. 74-WE-46-AD; Amdt. 39-2399] PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES McDonnell Douglas DCX10 Series Airplanes

Amendment 39-1811, (39 FR 11991), AD 74-08-04, as amended by Amendments 39-2013 (39 FR 40252) and 39- 2112, (41 FR 8544) requires certain modifications and functional checks to prevent possible in-flight depressurization of the airplane that might result from the opening of an improperly secured cargo

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER

door. In the preamble to Amendment 39-2112, the agency noted that one commentator had requested, in his response to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making, provision for dispatch of the aircraft with one of the dual cargo door warning systems inoperative. The comment was considered beyond the scope of the Notice, but the agency stated that the comment would be given further consideration. Additionally, after issuance -of Amendment 39-2112, the manufacturer requested the agency to permit dispatch of aircraft with one of the dual cargo door indicating systems inoperative provided: (1) Visual inspection verifies the door is closed and locked; and (2) the unaffected indicating system test is satisfactory.

The incorporation of test circuit of Service Bulletin 52-109 results in a dual system: System A, mechanical switch system; and System B, proximity switch system. The manufacturer states that either system meets the regulatory standards of the Federal Aviation Regulations. The manufacturer estimates a better than ten times improvement in reliability of the mechanical switch indicating system (System A), resulting from the addition to that provided by the mandatory incorporation of Service Bulletin 52-43. Furthermore, incorporation of the closed loop door locking system in all aircraft has eliminated the possibility that operational errors can result in an unsafe status of the cargo doors in flight because, if the door is not properly secured, the aircraft cannot be pressurized. I t is the manufacturer’s opinion, therefore, that a prohibition against dispatch with one of the dual warning systems inoperative imposes an unnecessary restriction on the operators.

After giving further consideration to the comments received on the Notice which led to Amendment 39-2112, and in light of the additional information provided by the manufacturer to support their request, the agency has concluded that the aircraft can be operated safely with one of the dual cargo door indicating systems inoperative per door, subject to the operational procedures noted herein.

Since this amendment provides relief from an operational restriction, and imposes no additional burden on any person, notice and public procedure hereon are unnecessary and the amendment may be made effective in less than 30 days.

In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (31 FR 13697), § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, Amendment 39-1811 (AD 74-08-04), as amended by Amendments 39-2013 and 39-2112, is further amended as follows:

a. Amend paragraph 2C, to read:“C. Ensure all cargo door warning lights

are extinguished prior to taxi, except us provided in paragraph 12, below.”

b. Add a new paragraph 12, to read:"12. Aircraft which have been modified in

accordance with paragraph 11, above, may be operated with one warning light (System A or System B) per door inoperative provided:

24, 1975

i

RULES AND REGULATIONS(a) The unaffected system test is satis

factory and indicates that the door is closed and locked; and

(b) The procedure specified by paragraph 2 of this AD is accomplished for the affected cargo door(s); and

(c) The aircraft is not dispatched from a station where repairs or replacements on the inoperative warning system can be made.”

This amendment becomes effective October 31, 1975.(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423); sec. 6(c), Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))

Issued in Los Angeles, California on October 14, 1975.

R obert H. S tanton,Director, -

FAA Western Region.[FR Doc.75-28643 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Docket No. 75-WE-31-AD; Arndt. 39-2404]PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

Litton Systems, Inc. LTN-72 Inertial Navigation Systems

A proposal to amend Part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations to include an airworthiness directive requiring modification of all unmodified LTN-72 inertial navigation systems which use the 72-0 computer program in accordance with Litton Systems Inc., Service Bulletin No. 34-72-80 dated February 20, 1975, was published in 40 FR 20289 dated May 9,1975.

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of the amendment. No comments questioning the possible occurrence of a condition which could result in the inability of the flight crew to immediately recognize a compass system failure due to loss of system power were received. One operator requested that the compliance period be extended to March 1, 1976. However, all affected. LTN-72 inertial navigation systems used by this operator have been modified according to Service Bulletin No. 34-72-80 in the interim.

In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (31 FR 13697), § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:Litton Sy stem s, I n c ., Aero Products Division. Applies to all LTN-72 inertial navigation systems installed on various airplane models, certificated in all categories, including, but not limited to, McDonnell Douglas DC-8 and DC-10 airplanes and Boeing 707 and 747 airplanes.

Compliance required as indicated prior to January l, 1976 unless already accomplished.

To provide the required failure warning indication of power loss, accomplish Litton Service Bulletin No. 34-72-80, dated February 20, 1975, or later FAA-approved revision, or an equivalent installation approved by the Chief, Aircraft Engineering Division, FAA Western Region. ■

This amendment becomes effective December 1,1975.(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and

1423); sec. 6(c), Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(C) ) )


R obert H. S tanton,Director,


[Docket No. 75-GL-22; Arndt. 39-2409]PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

Pressed Steel Tank Co. DOT-3HT-3000 Cylinders

There have been two failures of Pressed Steel Tank Company DOT-3HT-3000 cylinders during first filling, prior to service use, which revealed that some cylinders were manufactured with the wrong composition steel. Since this condition could exist in other Pressed Steel Tank Company DOT-3HT-3000 cylinders with original test dates indicated on the cylinder between January 1975 and April 1975, an airworthiness directive is being issued to require inspection of these cylinders used on slides, slide- rafts, or rafts in transport category airplanes.

Since immediate action is required in the interest of safety, compliance with the notice and public procedure provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act is not practical and good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than thirty (30) days.

In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (31 FR 13697 and 14 CFR 11.89), § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is amended by adding the following new Airworthiness Directive;Pressed Steel T a n k Co m pa n y . Applies to all transport category airplanes incorporating DOT-3HT-3000 compressed gas cylinders manufactured by Pressed Steel Tank Company with original test dates on the cylinder from January 1975 through April 1975 and the following serial numbers:

50793R through 51284R 51913R through 52295R 52413R through 52648R 52663R through 52759R 10316S through 10468S 10516S through 10723S 11316S through 11415S

Compliance required within 30 days after the effective date of this Airworthiness Directive, unless already accomplished.

To identify and prevent service use of DOT-3 HT-3000 cylinders which were manufactured with the wrong composition steel, accomplish the following:

(a) Remove affected cylinders from aircraft, or before installing affected cylinders in aircraft, retest hydrostatically in accordance with Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 178; or

(b) Use an equivalent method approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, Great Lakes Region, to determine that the affected cylinder is manufactured with the intended composition steel.

This amendment becomes effective November 10, 1975.(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423); sec. 6(c), Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))

49769Issued a t Des Plaines, Illinois on Oc

tober 16, 1975.John M. Cyrocki,

Director,Great Lakes Region.

[FR Doc.75-28652 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Docket No. 15060; Amdt. 39-2408]PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

SIAI Marchetti Models S. 205-18F and -2 0 F Airplanes

There have been reports of cracks in the nose landing gear drag brace, P/N 205-9-135, and the area around the nose landing gear drag brace attachments, P/Ns 205-1-059-01, on SIAI Marchetti Models S. 205-18F and -20F airplanes that could result in failure of the nose landing gear. Since this condition is likely to exist or develop in other airplanes of the same type design, an airworthiness directive is being issued to requiré inspection of the nose landing gear drag brace and the area around the drag brace attachments for cracks and the replacement of the drag brace and drag brace attachments on SIAI Marchetti ModelsS. 205-18F and -20F airplanes.

Since this situation requires immediate adoption of this regulation, notice and public procedure hereon are impracticable and good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 UJ5.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423); sec. 6(c) Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(C) ) )

In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (14 CFR 11.89), § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:Sia i Marchetti. Applies to Models S. 205-18F and —20F airplanes, S/Ns 001 through 003; 102 through 399 (except S/N 109); 4-101 through 4-282 (except S/N 4-245); 4-285, and 5—303, certificated in all categories.

Compliance is required as indicated, unless already accomplished.

To prevent possible failure of the nose landing gear, accomplish the following:

(á) Comply with paragraph (b) of this AD—

(1) Within the next 10 hours’ time in service after the effective date of this AD, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 50 hours’ time in service from the last inspection; and

(2) Prior to the'next takeoff after each hard-landing, except that the airplane may be flown in accordance with FAR §§ 21.197 and 21.199 to a base where paragraph (b) can be complied with.

(b) Inspect by visual and dye-penetrant methods the nose landing gear drag brace, P/N 205—9-135, and the area around the drag brace attachments, P/Ns 205-1-059-01, in accordance with paragraph a. of the “In-, structions” section of SIAI Marchetti Service BuUetin, S.B. No. 205B33, dated January 8, 1972, or an FAA-approved equivalent.

(c) Comply with paragraph (d) of this AD as follows:

(1) If a crack is found during the inspection required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD, comply with paragraph (d) of this AD before further flight, except that the airplane may be flown in accordance with FAR


49770§§21.197 and 21.199 to a base where paragraph (d) can be compiled with.

(2) If a crack Is not found during an Inspection required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD, comply with paragraph (d) of this AD within the next 50 hours’ time In service after the effective date of this AD or prior to the accumulation of 600 hours’ total airplane time in service, whichever occurs later.

(d) Replace the nose landing gear drag brace P/N 205-9-135, with a serviceable reinforced drag brace, P/N 205-9-135—03, and replace the two drag brace attachments, P/Ns 205-1-059-01, with serviceable drag brace attachments, P/Ns 205-1-180-01 and -02, in accordance with paragraph b. of the “Instructions” section of SIAI Marchetti Service Bulletin S.B. No. 205B33 dated January 8, 1972, or an FAA-approved equivalent.'

(e) The Inspections required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD may be discontinued upon accomplishment of the replacements required by paragraphs (c) and(d) of this AD.

This amendment becomes effective November 5, 1975.

Issued in Washington, DjC., on October 14, 1975. -

J. A. Ferrarese,i Acting Director,

Flight Standards Service.[FR Doc.75-28642 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

[Airworthiness Docket No. 75-WE-44-AD;Arndt. 39-2400]

PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES Sikorsky S-55 Series Helicopters

Pursuant to the authority of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, delegated to me by the Administrator (31 FR 13697), the following airworthiness directive applicable to Sikorsky S-55 series helicopters modified to incorporate AiResearch TSE331-3U-3Q3N engines installed in accordance with STC No. SH125WE or SH127WE, certificated in all categories, was adopted on September 5, 1975 and made effective immediately by airmail letters dated September 8, 1975, as to all known United States operators.

The AD was required because the agency received reports of transient overloading of the AiResearch TSE331 tufbo- shaft engine installed in the Sikorsky S- 55 helicopter. This overloading of the engine could cause a reduction in engine speed below operating limits and could result in a rapid loss of available power which would be observed as an engine/ rotor speed droop. Such engine overload is most likely to be encountered during abrupt or transient pilot control movements while operating near the engine temperature limit at higher density altitudes. Operation a t engine speeds below 99% will also increase the possibility of encountering this droop condition.

Since it was found that immediate corrective action was required, notice and public procedure thereon was impracticable and contrary to the public interest and good cause existed for making the airworthiness directive effective immediately as to all known U.S. operators of Sikorsky S-55 series helicopters incorporating the AiResearch TSE331-3U- 303N engine in all categories by individual air mail letters dated September 8, 1975. These conditions still exist and the

RULES AND REGULATIONSairworthiness directive is hereby published with certain clarifying changes in the Federal R egister as an amendment to § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Avia

tion Regulations to make it effective to all persons.S ik o r sk y . Applies to Sikorsky model S-55 series helicopters Incorporating AiResearch model TSE331-3U-303N engines per Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SH125WE or SH127WE, certificated in all categories.

Compliance required as indicated.To prevent possible inflight power loss ac

complish the following:A. Within the next 10 hours time in serv

ice after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished, and thereafter as required by subparagraph (8):

(1) Inspect and functionally test the fuel deceleration valve (AiResearch P/N 692545- 400 or 868558-1) by disconnecting the fuel bypass line and capping off the line to prevent fuel leakage from the fuel pump. With the engine operating and the “AIR-GROUND” switch in the “GROUND” position, the deceleration bleed valve is to be cycled electrically open and closed using the decel button on the pilots’ cyclic control stick to assure that no fuel leakage occurs when the valve is in the normally closed position. Replace the valve if it does not function properly or leaks any fuel when closed. Remove Cap and reconnect bypass line.

(2) Remove the tee fitting (AiResearch P/N 3101322-1) from the engine and visually inspect the orifice for blockage. Replace tee fitting if the orifice is restricted. Reinstall tee fitting to engine if found free of obstructions.

(3) With the engine operating at 100 percent engine speed and the “AIR-GROUND" switch in the “AIR” position, functionally test the manual fuel flow control valve (AiResearch P/N 868558-2) for proper operation by cycUng this valve using the cyclic control switch. If the engine does not react normally by losing RPM and then recovering to 100 percent engine speed as the manual fuel flow control valve is closed and opened, remove and replace this valve and repeat this functional check.

(4) Visually inspect the wiring and electrical connections associated with the deceleration control switch to assure that there has been no chafing or other damage which could cause Improper operation of the deceleration bleed valve or manual fuel flow control valve.

(5) Calibrate engine tachometer and engine tachometer generator as a pair against an accurate standard to within ±0.5% true reading.

(6) Inspect and adjust, as necessary, the underspeed governor adjustment in accordance with the FAA approved rotorcraft maintenance manual.

(7) Inspect and adjust, as necessary, the throttle linkage to insure that the throttle high RPM. stop is set correctly with respect to the engine fuel control stop in accordance with the FAA approved rotorcraft maintenance manual.

(8) Repeat the calibrations and inspections of paragraphs (5), (6) and (7), above, at intervals not to exceed 500 hours time in service, or twelve months, whichever occurs earlier. The calibrations required in (5) must be repeated whenever a tachometer Indicator or tachometer generator is replaced.

B. Within the next 10 hours time in service after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished:

(1) Install tfie fuel enrichment valve system per AiResearch Service Bulletin TSE331- 73-0045, dated August 25, 1975, or later FAA approved revisions, and Helltec Corporation Service Bulletin No. AS55-01-3, dated August 29, 1975; and

(2) Incorporate and comply with Aviation Specialties Company Sikorsky S-55, S-55B, and S-55C FAA approved Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) revision No. 6, dated August 29,1975, or later FAA approved revisions.

Note 1: B (1) a n d (2) sh a ll be p erfo rm ed s im u ltan eo u s ly .

Note 2 : Refer to AiResearch Service Bulletin TSE331-73-5004 dated July 16, 1973, and Aviation Specialties Service Bulletin AS55-01-1 dated July 6, 1973, for identification and location of related hardware.

C. Until the actions required by paragraph B. above are performed, the following operating limitations and flight limitations (Section I, RFM) shall apply.

(1) Before each takeoff with the collective full down and the rotor engaged, determine that the engine idles above 100.5% RPM with the high RPM stop.

(2) At takeoff power the engine speed must not be below 99% RPM.

(3) Avoid rapid collective increases under high power conditions.

D. After the effective date of this AD refer to the rotorcraft flight manual for the nominal specific gravity of approved fuel types (see Section II, Specific Gravity). Operating personnel shall assure that the engine fuel control specific gravity adjustment is set properly at all times for the type of fuel be trig used.

E. Équivalent procedures may be approved by the Chief, Aircraft Engineering Division, FAA Western Region, upon submission of adequate substantiating data.

F. Aircraft may be flown in accordance with FAR 21.197 to a base for performance of the inspections, maintenance, and modifications required by this AD, provided the operating limitations set forth in paragraph(c) are applied.

This amendment becomes effective October 31,1975 for all persons except those to whom it was made effective by individual airmail letters, dated September 8, 1975 which contained this amendment.(Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423); sec. 6(c), Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c) ) )


R obert S tanton,Director,


CHAPTER II— CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD

SUBCHAPTER A— ECONOMIC REGULATIONS [Reg. ER-936; Arndt. 5]

PART 207— CHARTER TRIPS AND SPECIAL SERVICES

Quarterly Filing of Depository Account Reports With the Board; Deletion

Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board a t its office in Washington, D.C., October 21,1975.

The Board’s general charter rules, Parts 207, 208, 212 and 214, (14 CFR Parts 207, 208, 212 and 214) and its special charter rules, Parts 372,372a, 373, 378,378a (14 CFR Parts 372,372a, 373,378 and 378a) require that the various classes of direct carriers and indirect air carriers provide security for the protection of charter customers’ advance payments. One of the prescribed methods for securing such funds involves the establish-



mentof an escrow account with a qualified bank. When this arrangement is used, the depository bank and the carrier are required by §§ 207.18, 208.41, 212.16, 214.9d, 372a.50(c), 373.17 and 378.16a, to file periodic reports with the Board of funds received and disbursed.

These filed reports have not proved to serve any useful purpose, while, on the other hand, our experience with customers’ deposits secured by escrowed funds indicates no need to devise more detailed and burdensome reports. We have therefore decided to dispense with reporting requirements hereunder at this time. ' ^

It should be noted, however, that our deletion of these reporting requirements leaves unimpaired the existing requirement that appropriate records be retained with respect to these escrowed funds, so that they will be readily accessible for inspection by our Bureau of Enforcement.

Accordingly, we are amending Part 207 by deleting the present quarterly reporting requirement in § 207.18.

Since this amendment is procedural in nature and relieves a burden, the Board finds that notice 'and public procedure hereon are unnecessary and the amendment may be made effective immediately.

Accordingly, the Civil Aeronautics Board hereby amends Part 207 of its Economic Regulations (14 CPR Part 207), effective October 21, 1,975, as follows:

1. Amend the table of contents by deleting the reference to § 207.18, the amended table to read as follows:

Subpart A— General Provision * * * • •

Sec.207.17 Protection of customers’ deposits.

Subpart B— Provisions Relating to Pro Rata % Charters

• * * * •

§207.108 [Deleted]2. Delete § 207.18.

(Sec. 204 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 72 Stat. 743, (49 UJS.C. 1324))

By the Civil Aeronautics Board.[seal]- Edwin Z. H olland,

Secretary.[FR Doc.75-28703 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 am]

[Reg. ER—93, Arndt. 5]PART 208— TERMS, CONDITIONS AND

LIMITATIONS OF CERTIFICATES TO ENGAGE IN SUPPLEMENTAL AIR TRANSPORTATIONQuarterly Filings of Depository Account

Reports With the Board; DeletionAdopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board

at its office in Washington, D.C., October 21, 1975.

For the reasons stated in ER-936, issued contemporaneously herewith, the Civil Aeronautics Board hereby amends Part 208 of its Economic Regulations (14 CFR Part 208), effective, October 21, 1975, as follows:

1. Amend the table of contents by revising the reference to § 208.41 to read as follows:

Sec.208.41 [Reserved]§ 208.41 [Reserved]

2. Delete and reserve § 208.41 as follows:(Sec. 204 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 72 Stat. 743 (49 U.S.C. 1324))

By the Civil Aeronautics Board.[ seal] • Edwin Z. Holland,

Secretary.[FR Doc.75-28705 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

[Reg. ER-938, Amdt. 16]PART 212— CHARTER TRIPS BY

FOREIGN AIR CARRIERSQuarterly Filings of Depository Account

Reports With the Board; DeletionAdopted by the Civil Aeronautics

Board at its office in Washington, D.C., October 21, 1975.

For the reasons stated in ER-936, issued contemporaneously herewith, the Civil Aeronautics Board hereby amends Part 212 of its Economic Regulations (14 CFR Part 212) effective October 21, 1975, as folldws:

1. Amend the table of contents by deleting the reference to § 212.16, the amended table of contents to read as follows:

Subpart A— General Provisions * • * * *

Sec.212.15 Protection of customers’ deposits.

Subpart B— Provisions Relating to Pro Rata Charters

* • • • e§ 212.16 [Deleted]

2. Delete § 212.16.(Sec. 204 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 72 Stat. 743 (49 U.S.C. 1324))

By the Civil Aeronautics Board.[seal! Edwin Z. H olland,

Secretary.[FR Doc.75-28704 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Reg. ER—939, Amdt. 14]PART 214— TERMS, CONDITIONS AND

LIMITATIONS OF FOREIGN AIR CARRIER PERMITS AUTHORIZING CHARTER TRANSPORTATION ONLYQuarterly Filings of Depository Account


Board a t its office in Washington, D.C., October 21, 1975.

For the reasons stated in ER-936, issued contemporaneously herewith, the Civil Aeronautics Board hereby amends Part 214 (14 CFR Part 214), effective October 21, 1975, as follows:

1. Amend the table of contents by deleting the reference to § 214.9d, the amended table of contents to read as follows:

Subpart A— Provisions Relating to Pro Rata Charters

* * * * •Sec.214.9c Protection of customers’ deposits. 214.10 Applicability of this subpart.

* * * - * *

§ 214.9d [Deleted]2. Delete § 214.9d.

(Sec. 204 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 72 Stat. 743 (49 U8.C. 1324))

By the Civil Aeronautics Board.[seal] Edwin Z. H olland,

Secretary.'[FR Doc.75-28702 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Reg. ER-935, Amdt. 24]PART 249— PRESERVATION OF AIR CAR

RIER ACCOUNTS, RECORDS, AND MEMORANDAPreservation of Records by One-Stop.-

Inclusive Tour Charter OperatorsAdopted by the Civil Aeronautics

Board at its office in Washington, D.C., August 7, 1975.

By Notice of Proposed Rule Making EDR-281/SPDR-38/ODR-9,‘ the Board proposed adoption of a new Special Regulation (14 CFR Part 378a) establishing a new class of charter to be designated as' a One-stop-inclusive Tour Charter. At the same time, the Board proposed various implementing amendments to other of its Economic Regulations, including Part 249 (14 CFR Part 249). By SPR-85 issued August 8, 1975, the Board adopted its proposal to authorize One-stop-inclusive Tour Charters. For the reasons set forth in SPR-85, the Board has now decided to adopt the proposed amendments to Part 249. Accordingly, in consideration of the foregoing, the Board hereby amends Part 249 of its Economic Regulations (14 CFR Part 249) effective October 16, 1975, as follows:

Amend § 249.2 by revising the definition of “tour operator” to read as follows:§ 249.2 Definitions.

For the purposes of this part:* * * *

“Tour operator” means: (1) Any citizen of the United States, as defined in Section 101(13) of the Act (otl\er than a" direct air carrier) who is authorized under the provisions of Part 378 or of Part 378a, or both, to engage in the formation of group» for transportation on inclusive tours; or (2) any person not a citizen of the United States, as defined in Section 101(13) of the Act (other than a direct foreign air carrier) who is engaged in the formation of groups for transportation on inclusive tours which originate in the United States in accordance with the provisions of Part 378 or of Part 378a, or both, and who holds a permit issued pursuant to Section 402 of the Act authorizing such transportation.

Amend § 249.9 by revising paragraph(a) to read as follows:

* * * * * >

(a) Every tour operator (as defined in § 249.2) conducting a tour or Series of tours pursuant to Part 378 or Part 378a of this chapter shall retain for two years after completion of a tour or a series of tours true copies of the following docu-

1 Dated October 30, 1974 (Docket 27135).

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 40, NO. 207— FR.DAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

49772 RULES AND REGULATIONS

ments at its principal or general office in the United States and shall make them available upon request by an authorized representative of the Board:

(1) All receipts and statements of travel agents an d all other documents which evidence or reflect deposits made by each tour participant;

(2) All receipts .and statements of travel agents and all other documents which evidence or reflect commissions received, paid to, or deducted by travel agents in connection with the tour or series of tours; and

(3) All statements, invoices, bills, and receipts from suppliers for furnishing of goods or services in connection with the tour or series of tours.

* * * * * (Secs. 204(a ),*402 and 407 'of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 72 Stat. 743, 757, 766; (49 U.S.C. 1324, 1372, 1377))

N o te : The records maintenance requirements contained in § 249.9(a) have been approved by the U.S. General Accounting Office under number B-180226 (R0295).

By the Civil Aeronautics Board.[seal] E dwin Z. H olland,

: Secretary.[FR Doc.75-28699 Filed 10-23-75:8:45]

SUBCHAPTER D— SPECIAL REGULATIONS [Reg. SPR-91, Arndt. 12]

PART 372a— TRAVEL GROUP CHARTERSMonthly Filings of Depository Account


Board at its office in Washington, D.C., October 21,1975.

For the reasons stated in ER-936, issued contemporaneously herewith the Civil Aeronautics Board hereby amends Part 372a of its Special Regulations, (14 CFR Part 372a) effective October 21, 1975, as follows:§ J572a.50 [Amended]

Amend § 372a.50 by deleting paragraph (c).(Sec. 204 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 72 Stat. 743, (49 U.S.O. 1324))

By the Civil Aeronautics'Board.[seal! Edwin Z. H olland,

Secretary.[FR Doc.75-2870i Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Reg. SPR-92; Arndt. 7]PART 373— STUDY GROUP CHARTERS BY

DIRECT AIR CARRIERS AND STUDY GROUP CHARTERERSMonthly Filings of Depository Account


Board a t its office in Washington, D.C., October 21, 1975.

For the reasons stated in ER-936, issued contemporaneously herewith, the Civil Aeronautics Board hereby amends Part 373 of its Special Regulations <14 CFR Part 373) effective October 21,1975, as follows:

1. Amend the table of contents of Part 373 by revising the reference to § 373.17 to read as follows:Sec.373.17 [Reserved](Sec. 204 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 72 Stat. 743 (49 U.S.C. 1324))§ 373.17 [Reserved]

2. Delete and reserve § 373.17, as follows:

By the Civil Aeronautics Board.[seal] Edwin Z. Holland,


[Reg. SPR-93; Arndt. 11]PART 378— INCLUSIVE TOUR CHARTERS

Monthly Filings of Depository Account Reports With the Board; Deletion

Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board a t its office in Washington, D.C., October 21, 1975.

For the reasons stated in ER-936, issued contemporaneously herewith, the Civil Aeronautics Board hereby amends Part 378 of its Special Regulations (14 CFR Part 378) effective October 21, 1975, as follows:

1. Amend the table of contents by deleting the reference to § 378.16a, the amended table of contents to read as follows:

* * • • *.Subpart B— Conditions and Limitations * * * * *

Sec.378.16 Surety bond.378.17 Contract between tour operators or

foreign tour operators and tour participants.

* * -* * *§ 378.16a [Deleted]

2. Delete § 378.16a(Sec. 204 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 72 Stat. 743 (49 U.S.C. 1324))

By the Civil Aeronautics Board.[seal] Edwin Z. Holland,


Title 17— Commodity and Securities Exchanges

CHAPTER II— SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

(Release 34-11742]ORGANIZATION, INFORMATION AND RE

QUESTS, GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, AND FORMS

Registration of Municipal Securities Brokers and Dealers

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rule 15Ba2-l,1 related Form MSD,® rule 15Ba2-2,3 and temporary rules 15a-l(T) * and 15Ba2-3(T),* effective immediately, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act <5 U.S.C. 551 ct seq.) , and pursuant to the

See footnotes at end of document.

Commission’s authority under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”),6 particularly sections 2, 3, 15, 17, and 23 thereof7 and section 13 (new section 15B of the Act) of the Securities Acts Amendments of 1975 (the “1975 Amendments”) .

Rule 15Ba2-l provides that municipal securities dealers which are banks or separately identifiable departments or divisions of banks must apply for registration with the Commission under section 15B(a) of the Act on Form MSD. Rule

/15Ba2-2 requires nonbank municipal securities dealers whose business is exclusively intrastate (“intrastate dealers’.') to apply for registration with the Commission under section 15B(a) of the Act oh Form BD, and prescribes certain additional procedures relating.to the registration of such dealers. Temporary rules'15a-l(T) and 15Ba2-3(T) temporarily exempt municipal securities brokers and dealers from the registration requirements of sections 15 and 15B(a) of the Act, respectively, provided that such persons file their applications for registration with the Commission not later than November 30, 1975, and otherwise comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the Commission and the Municipal Securities. Rulemaking Board to the same extent-as if they were registered on December 1,1975.

In connection with the adoption of rules 15Ba2-l and 15Ba2-2, the Commission has provided, effective immediately, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, delegated authority, pursuant to Pub. L. 87-592, 76 Stat. 394,8 to the Directors of the Office of Reports and Information Services and the Division of Market Regulation to grant applications for registration of municipal securities dealers under section 15B(a) of the Act.

Introduction. On June 4,1975, the 1975 Amendments were signed into law, substantially amending the Act and establishing a comprehensive framework for the regulation of the activities of municipal securities brokers and dealers. Under new section 15B(a) of the Aet, as added by the 1975 Amendments, municipal securities dealers which are banks, or separately identifiable departments or divisions of banks, and intrastate dealers are required to be registered with the Comm ission in accordance with such rules as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. Section 15B(a)(1) provides:• It shall be unlawful for any municipal securities dealer (other than one registered as a broker or dealer under section 15 of this title) to make use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to effect any transaction in, or to induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of, any muixicipal security unless such municipal securities dealer is registered in accordance with this subsection.

Non-bank municipal securities dealers other than intrastate dealers and municipal securities brokers are required to be registered under section 15 of the Act and to apply for registration on Form BD, the standard registration form for brokers and dealers.8 The provisions of See footnotes at end of document.


RULES AND REGULATIONS 49773sections 15 and 15B(a) become applicable to municipal securities brokers and dealers on December 1,1975.“

On August 11, 1975,«the Commission issued Securities Exchange Act Release No. 11585 (“Release No. 11585”),11 announcing procedures for the registration of municipal securities brokers and dealers under section 15 of the Act, giving notice of proposed rule 15Ba2-l, related proposed Form MSD, and proposed rule 15Ba2-2, and Soliciting comments on the proposed rules and Form and on other matters relating to the registration of municipal securities brokers and dealers.“

In Release No. 11585 the Commission indicated that municipal securities brokers and non-bank municipal securities dealers other than intrastate dealers would be required to apply for registration on Form BD. The Commission urged that such municipal securities brokers and dealers file their applications for registration with the Commission as promptly as possible to facilitate processing in an orderly and timely manner. Proposed rule 15Ba2-l provided that banks would be required to apply for registration with the Commission on a new application form, Form MSD, and to file a statement of financial condition in connection with such application. Proposed rule 15Ba2-2 provided that intrastate dealers would be required to apply for registration with the Commission on Form BD and to file the statements required by rule 15bl-2.

The Commission stated in Release No. 11585 that banks which meet the definition of “municipal securities dealer” in section 3(a) (30) of the Act would be required to be registered with the Commission under section 15B(a) of the Act unless the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the “Board”) , in accordance with its authority under section 15B(b) (2) (H) of the Act, had defined by rule the term “separately identifiable department or division” with respect to banks, and the prospective bank applicant had a department or division meeting the requirements of the Board’s rule.“ On October 10,1975 the Board filed rule proposals with the Commission relating to, among other matters, the definition of a “separately identifiable department or division” of a bank. These rules have become effective and are presently rules of the Board for purposes of the Act.14 The text of the Board’s rule defining a “separately identifiable department or division” of a bank and a general definitional rule of the Board are set forth Elsewhere in this release.

Banks Subject to Registration as Municipal Securities Dealers. Section 3(a) (30) of the Act defines a “municipal securities dealer” as follows:

* * * any person (including a separately identifiable department or division of a bank) engaged in tbe business of buying and selling municipal securities for his own account, through a broker, or otherwise, but does not include—

* * * * * a bank, unless the bank is engaged in the business of buying and selUng municipal se-

See footnotes at end of document.

curities for its own account other than in a fiduciary capacity, through a broker or otherwise: Provided, however, That if the bank is engaged in such business through a separately identifiable department or division (as defined by the Municipal Securities Rule- making Board in accordance with Section 15B(b) (2) (H) of this title ), the department or division and not the bank itself shall be deemed to be the municipal securities dealer.

Whether a bank“ is “engaged in the business” of buying and selling municipal securities for its own account as a dealer is a factual question to, be resolved in light of all relevant circumstances. However, the Commission believes that it is appropriate to set forth certain guidelines to assist individual banks in determining whether to apply for registration with-the Commission.

The definition of a “municipal securities dealer” in section 3(a) (30) of the Act, as it applies to banks, incorporates language found in the definition of a “dealer” in section 3(a) (5) of the Act and thus traditional concepts of what constitute dealer activities. A bank which buys and sells municipal securities solely for investment for its own account or for accounts fot which it acts as a fiduciary will not generally be classified as a dealer, even though such purchases and sales are made with some frequency. Virtually every bank has municipal securities in its investment portfolio, and purchases and sales may occur to accommodate changes in the bank’s financial position or to reflect investment decisions. The Commission believes that it was not the intent of Congress that every bank engaged in such investment-type activity register as a dealer.

In the view of the Commission, activities which may subject a bank to the registration requirements of the Act applicable to municipal securities dealers, if the jurisdictional means are used,“ are as follows/

(1) underwriting, which includes participation in a syndicate or joint account for the purchase of municipal securities;

(2) maintaining a trading account in municipal securities or otherwise carrying a dealer inventory in municipal securities; lT

(3) advertising or listing as a dealer in professional publications such as Standard & Poor’s “Blue List of Current Municipal Offerings”, the Bond Buyer’s “Directory of Municipal Bond Dealers of the United States”, or Polk’s “World Bank Directory”, or advertising in publications of general circulation as a dealer in municipal securities; or

(4) otherwise holding itself out to other dealers or to investors as a dealer in municipal securities.

While the determination of when a bank is a municipal securities dealer might be premised on, among other matters, the number of transactions engaged in by the bank in a non-fiduciary capacity or the rate of turnover of the bank’s inventory of municipal securities, the Commission does not now have sufficient data or experience with bank municipal securities dealers to ascertain whether such tests are appropriate. In any event, it would appear that the na

ture of a bank’s activities, rather than the volume of transactions or similar criteria, are of greater relevance in determining when a bank is a municipal securities dealer. The Commission invites written comments from interested persons on whether the standards set forth above are appropriate for determining whether a bank is a municipal securities dealer within the meaning of section 3(a) (30) of the Act, or whether other factors should be considered in making such determination. Such comments should be submitted in triplicate to George A. Fitzsimmons, Secretary of the Commission, and should refer to Commission File No. S7-577. All such comments will be available for public inspection.

The Commission also notes that a bank which engages in bona fide brokerage transactions on behalf of customers will not, solely for that reason, be considered a dealer for purposes of section 3(a) (30) of the Act. Banks are excluded from the definition of “broker” in section 3(a)(4) of the Act, and thus are not subject to the provisions of the Act requiring brokers to register.“

Separately Identifiable Department or Division of a Bank. Although a bank may meet the definition of a “municipal securities dealer” for purposes of section 3(a) (30) of the Act, that section provides that a bank will not be considered to be a municipal securities dealer if the bank engages in such business through a “separately identifiable department or division” as defined by the Board in accordance with the Board’s authority under section 15B(b)(2) (H) of the Act.“ If a bank has such a department or division, the department or division will be deemed to be the municipal securities dealer and Only that department or division need register.

The following definitional rules of the Board have become effective pursuant to section 19(b) of the Act; K R ule 1* Definitions.

.(a) For purposes of the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, the terms used in such rules shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.

(b) The term “Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as from time to time amended.

(c) The term “Board” shall mean the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board.

(d) The term “Commission” shall mean the Securities and Exchange Commission.

R u le 4. Separately Identifiable Department or Division of a Bank.

(a) A separately identifiable department or division of a bank, as such term is used in section 8(a) (30) of the Act, is that unit of the bank which conducts all of the activities of the bank relating to the conduct of business as a municipal securities dealer (“municipal securities dealer activities”), as such activities are hereinafter defined: Provided That:

(1) Such unit is under the direct supervision of an officer or officers designated by the board of directors of the bank as responsible for the day-to-day conduct of the bank’s municipal securities dealer activities, including the supervision of all bank employees engaged in the performance of such activities; and


49774(2) There are separately maintained In or

separately extractable from such unit’s own facilities or the facilities of the bank, all of the records relating to the bank’s municipal securities dealer activities, And further provided That such records are so maintained or otherwise accessible as to permit independent examination thereof and enforcement of applicable provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and the rules of the Board.

(b) For purposes of this rule, the activities of thé bank which shall Constitute municipal securities dealer activities are as follows:

(1) underwriting, trading and sales of municipal securities;

(2) processing and clearance activities with respect to municipal securities;

(3) research, analysis and the preparation of literature for Use in connection with the activities described in paragraph (1) above; and

(4) maintenance of records pertaining to the activities described in paragraphs (1) through (3) above.

(c) The fact that directors and senior officers of the bank may from time to time set broad policy guidèlines affecting the bank as a whole and which are not directly related to the day-to-day conduct of the bank’s municipal securities dealer activities, shall not disqualify the unit hereinbefore described as a separately identifiable department or division of the bank or require that 'such directors or officers be considered as part of such unit.

(d) The fact that the bank’s municipal securities dealer activities are conducted In more than one geographic, organizational or operational unit of the bank shall not preclude a finding that the bank has a separately identifiable department or division for purposes of this rule, provided, however, That all such units are identifiable and that the requirements of subparagraphs (1) and (2) of paragraph (a) of this rule are met with respect to each such unit. All such geographic, organizational or operational units of the bank shall be considered in the aggregate as the separately identifiable department or division of the bank for purposes of this rule.

Adoption of Rule 15Ba2-l and Form MSD. The Commission has adopted rule 15Ba2-l and related Form MSD with modifications from the form in which they were proposed in Release No. 1Ï585. These include the following:

1. Rule 15Ba2-l, as adopted, makes Form MSD applicable to separately identifiable departments or divisions of banks as well as to banks.

2. The requirement in proposed rule 15Ba2-l, that an applicant file with the Commission a statement of financial condition in connection with its application for registration has been omitted in rule 15Ba2-l, as adopted.

3. New paragraphs (b) and (c) of the rule 15Ba2-l set forth requirements for filing amendments to the application and clarify the status of such amendments for purposes of sections 17 and 32(a) of the Act.51

4. With respect to Form MSD, item 5, and the requirement for filing a separate Schedule relating to business and educational background, have been revised to make clear that only those persons directly engaged in the management, supervision or direction of the applicant’s municipal securities dealer activities (defined in the instructions-to Form MSD)

See footnotes at the end of document.

FEDERAL

RULES AND REGULATIONSneed to be listed in response to the item and to have a detailed statement of their educational and business background submitted.

5. Item 6 in Form MSD has been revised to make clear that only those persons directly or indirectly controlling applicant’s municipal securities dealer activities and not named in answer to item 5 must be identified in response to item 6. A detailed statement of educational and business background is not required to be submitted for such persons.

6. Item 7 of Form MSD has been revised include reference to the findings of appropriate bank regulatory agencies in certain' paragraphs. Paragraph (ix) in proposed Form MSD has been omitted. Item 7 applies to all employees of the applicant engaged.in its municipal securities dealer activities, as well as to all persons in direct or indirect control of the applicant.

7. Various questions have been added to Form MSD relating to separately identifiable departments or divisions of banks, to enable the Commission to determine whether an applicant which is a department or division meets the applicable criteria for registration established by the Board in its rule 4 definition.

8. The form of execution has been changed to clarify the responsibility of the executing officer with respect to the information set forth in Form MSD.

9. The instructions to the Form have been expanded to clarify specific items in the Form and to define certain additional terms used in the Form.

The Commission finds that the adoption of rule 15Ba2-l and related Form MSD is necessary to provide an orderly procedure for the prompt registration of municipal securities dealers which are banks or separately identifiable departments or divisions of banks and that such adoption is therefore necessary and appropriate in the public interest and for the protection of investors, and that it is consistent with the purposes of the Act. The Commission also finds that rule 15Ba2-l and related Form MSD will not impose any burden on competition. The Commission further finds, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b) (3) (B) ), that notice and public procedure with respect to the Changes in the rule and Form are impracticable and contrary to the public interest as a prerequisite to the adoption of the rule and Form, and that such rule and Form should be adopted, effective immediately, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553 (d)(3)), in order to provide an orderly and timely procedure for the registration of municipal securities dealers subject to the rule.

Subsidiaries of Banks and of Bank Holding Companies. The Commission notes that municipal securities dealers which are subsidiaries of banks or of bank holding companies meet the definition of a “dealer” set forth in section 3 (a)(5) of the Act. As such these subsidiaries will be required to be registered under section 15 of the Act, rather than section 15B(a). Accordingly, without further action by the Commission, such

REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER

subsidiaries are subject to registration on Form BD, rather than Form MSD.

The Commission also wishes to point out that municipal securities dealers which register under section 15 of the Act automatically become members of and subject to assessments by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) . The Commission invites comments from interested persons on (1) whether such subsidiaries should be exempted from the registration requirements of section 15 of the Act and instead required to be registered under section 15B of the Act, (2) whether SIPC coverage is appropriate for the customers of such subsidiaries in view of the fact that as a matter of corporate organization such subsidiaries are not a part of their parent bank, and (3) the extent to which such subsidiaries are presently, subject to the requirements of banking law applicable to banks and the extent to which the activities of such subsidiaries are scrutinized by the appropriate bank regulatory authorities to ensure compliance with such requirements. Comments on these matters should be submitted in accordance with the procedures set forth infra.

Adoption of Rule 15Ba2-2. The Commission has also adopted rule 15Ba2-2, relating to the registration of intrastate dealers, with certain modifications from the form in which it was proposed in Release No. 11585. The rule, as adopted, requires applicants to file a statement with the Commission to the effect that they are applying for registration as intrastate dealers in accordance with the rule. New paragraphs (c) and (d> of the rule set forth requirements for filing amendments and clarifying the status of amendments for purposes of sections 17 and 32(a) of the Act.

The Commission finds that the adoption of rule 15Ba2-2 is necessary to provide an orderly procedure for the prompt registration of intrastate dealers and that such adoption is therefore necessary and appropriate in the public interest and for the protection of investors, and that it is consistent with the purposes of the Act. The Commission also finds that rule 15Ba2-2 will not impose any burden on competition. The Commission further finds, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)), that notice and public procedure with respect to the changes in the rule are impracticable, unnecessary and contrary to the public interest and that such rule should be adopted, effective immediately, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(d) (3)), in order to provide an orderly and timely procedure for the registration of municipal securities dealers subject to the rule.

Adoption of Temporary Rules 15ar-l (T) and 15Ba2-3(T). Under the provisions of sections 15(b) (1) and 15B(a) (2) of the Act, the Commission must take action within 45 days of the date of filing of an application for registration, either to grant registration or to institute proceedings to determine whether registration should be denied. As indicated above, the provisions of the Act which have the effect of requiring municipal

24, 1975

RULES AN1X REGULATIONSsecurities brokers and dealers to be registered with the Commission become effective on December 1, 1975.“ In Release No. 11585, the Commission urged municipal securities brokers and dealers (other than banks and intrastate dealers) to file their applications for registration on Form BD with the Commission not later than October 17, 1975. The Commission indicated that filing by such date would assure that the Commission would be able to act upon such applications by December 1,1975.

Under sections 15(a) (2) and 15B(a) (4) of the Act the Commission has broad authority to exempt brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers from the registration requirements of the Act if the Commission finds that such exemption is consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors, and with respect to the registration of municipal securities dealers under section 15B(a) of the Act, consistent with the purposes of such section. The Commission finds that itiwould not be practicable for municipal securities dealers subject to section 15B(a) of the Act to be required to be registered with the Commission effective December 1, 1975 since such dealers will not have sufficient time to obtain the appropriate forms for registration, complete and file them with .the Commission and still be assured of Commission action on their applications prior to December 1,1975, nor would the Commission havè sufficient time to give such ' applications a careful and complete review consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors.

The Commission finds that it is consistent with the public interest, the protection of investors and the purposes of section 15B(a) to grant, by rule, a temporary exemption from the registration requirements of section 15B(a) of the Act to municipal securities dealers who file their applications for registration with the Commission not later than November 30, 1975 and who are in compliance with all other applicable provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder and the rules of the Board which by their terms would apply to such dealers if they were registered with the Commission on December 1,1975.

The Commission _ has therefore adopted, effective immediately, temporary rule 15Ba2-3(T), granting a temporary exemption from the- requirements of section 15BCa) of the Act to municipal securities dealers which meet the conditions of such rule. The temporary exemption would terminate as to an individual dealer on the earlier of the granting or denial of the dealer’s registration under section 15B(a) or the dealer’s failure to comply with the conditions of the rule. The temporary rule would expire on June 1, 1976.

With respect to municipal securities dealers subject to section 15(a) (1) of the Act, i.e., non-bank municipal securities dealers other than intrastate dealers, the Commission stated in Release No. 11585 that Form BD was the appropriate form for registration of such deal-

ers, as Well as municipal securities brokers. While such brokers and dealers therefore have been notified of the applicable requirements for registration considerably in advance of the date of this release, it has come to the attention of the Commission that there may still be Uncertainty on the part of many such brokers and dealers as to the applicability of the registration requirements to them. The Commission wishes to stress that all such brokers and dealers are required to be registered with the Commission, pursuant to section 15(a) (1) of the Act, irrespective of membership in the National Association of Securities Dealers, InoT he Commission also recognizes that since Form BD has only recently been revised,23 municipal securities brokers and dealers may not have had sufficient time to obtain the revised form and file it with the Commission in order to be assured that action could be taken on their applications for registration by December 1,1975.

The Commission has, therefore, determined that it is appropriate and consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors to grant, by rule, a temporary exemption from the registration requirements of section 15(a) (1) of the Act to municipal securities brokers and dealers otherwise subject to such requirements on terms and conditions similar to those set forth in temporary rule 15Ba2-3(T) for municipal securities dealers subject to the requirements of section 15B(a) of the Act. Accordingly, the Commission has adopted temporary rule 15a-l(T), effective immediately. The rule will expire on June 1, 1976.

The Commission finds, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)), that temporary rules 15a-l(T) and 15Ba2-3(T) relieve municipal securities brokers and dealers from requirements that would otherwise be applicable to them, that notice and public procedure are therefore unnecessary as a prerequisite to the adoption of such rules, and that the rules should be adopted, effective immediately, in accordance with the Administrative Prbcedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)), in order to permit municipal securities brokers and dealers to file their applications with the Commission in an orderly and timely manner and to afford the Commission adequate time to review such», applications carefully and com- petely, consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors. The Commission further finds that temporary rules 15a-l(T) and 15Ba2-3(T) will not impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

The Commission emphasizes that municipal securities brokers and dealers should attempt to file their applications for registration at as early a date as possible in order to permit all applications to be processed in an orderly manner. Such applications must be filed in any event with the Commission prior to December 1,1975.

Delegation of authority. The regulations of the Commission relating to gen-

49775eral organization are concurrently being amended to delegate authority to the Directors of the Office of Reports and Information Services and the Division of Market Regulation to issue orders granting registration of municipal securities, dealers under section 15B(a) of the Act. The Commission staff has similar authority with respect to the registration of brokers and dealers under section 15 of the Act (including municipal securities brokers and dealers).“

The Commission finds, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b) (3) (B) ), that the foregoing action relates solely to agency organization, procedure or practice and that notice and public procedure are therefore not necessary. The Commission further finds that such amendment should be adopted, effective immediately, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)), in order to permit municipal securities dealers to be registered under section 15B(a) of the Act in a prompt and orderly manner.(Secs. 2, 3, 15, 17, 23, 48 Stat. 881, 882, 895, 897, 901, as amended by secs. 2, 3, 11, 14, 18, 89 Stat. 97, 97-104, 121-127, 137-141, 155-156; sec. 13, 89 Stat. 131-137 (15 U.S.C. 78b, 78c, 78o, 78q, and 78w, as amended by Pub. L. No. 94-29; 15 U.S.C. 78o-4, as added by Pub. L. No. 24-29))

By the Commission.George A. F itzsimmons,

Secretary.October 15, 1975.

F ootnotes! ? 17 CFR 240.15Ba2—1.

2 17 CFR 249.950.3 17 CFR 240.15Ba2-2.* 17 CFR 240*15a-l (T ).E 17 CFR 240.15Ba2-3 (T ).* 15 UJS.C. 78a et seq., as amended by Pub.

L. 94-29 (June 4,1975).7 15 U.S.C. 78b, 78c, 78o, 78q and 78w.8 15 U.S.C. 78d—1, 78d-2.®Such persons are “brokers” or “dealers”

within the meaning of sections 3(a)(4) and 3(a)(5) of the Act. Intrastate dealers are not, however, subject to the registration requirements of section 15 of the Act since section 15(a)(1) contains an exception for brokers and dealers whose business is exclusively intrastate. In section 15B(a) (1), however, there is no such'exclusion and the jurisdictional basis appears to be sufficiently broad to be applicable to all such dealers. Thus, any municipal securities dealer which makes use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to effect transactions in municipal securities (other, than dealers registered under section 15) must register under section 15B(a). In section 3(a) (17) of the Act, as amended by the 1975 Amendments, thè definition of “interstate commerce” includes the "intrastate use of * * * a telephone or other intrastate means of communication * * *

10 Section 31(a) of the 1975 Amendments.1140 FR 37228 (1975) .12 The comment period expired on Septem

ber 12, 1975. Comments are contained in Commission File No. S7-577, which is available for public Inspection.

“ The Board was constituted on September 5, 1975. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 11635 (Sept. 5, 1975).

“ The Board’s rule proposals also concerned matters relating to the operation and administration of the Board. Notice of all rule proposals filed by the Board is expected to be


49776 RULES AND REGULATIONSpublished in the F ederal Register during the week of October 20, 1975. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 11741 (October 15, 1975).

18 A "bank” is defined in section 3(a)(6) of the Act as follows:* * * (A) a banking institution organized under the laws of the United States, ,(B) a member bank of the Federal Reserve System, (C) any other banking Institution, whether incorporated or not, doing business under the laws of any State or of the United States, a substantial portion of the business of which consists of receiving deposits or exercising a fiduciary power similar to those permitted to national banks under section ll(k ) of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, and which is supervised and examined by State or Federal authority having supervision over banks, and which is not operated for the purpose of evading the provisions of this title, and (D) a receiver, conservator, or other liquidating agent of any institution or firm included in clauses (A), (B), or (C) of this paragraph.

18 See note 9 supra.17 The bank regulatory agencies have gen

erally defined “trading account securities^’ as a portfolio of securities separate from the bank’s investment account which are held for resale to other banks and the public generally.

“ Section 3(a) (4) provides:The term "broker” means any person en

gaged in the business of effecting transactions in securities for the account of others, but does not include a bank.

“ Section 15B(b) (2) (H) of the Act requires the Board to :

* • * define the term ‘separately identifiable department or division’, as that term is used in section 3(a) (SO) of this title, in accordance with specified and appropriate standards to assure that a bank is not deemed to be engaged in the business of buying and. selling municipal securities through a separately identifiable department or division unless such department or division is organized and administered so as to permit independent examination and enforcement of applicable provisions of this title, the rules and regulations thereunder and the rules of the Board. A separately identifiable department or division of a bank may be engaged in activities other than those relating to municipal securities.

20 15 UJ3.C. 78s. In addition to the Board rules set forth in this release, rules 2 and 3 of the Board, "which establish certain procedures for the administration of the Board, such as those relating to notice of meetings, quorum and . voting requirements and the submission of rule proposals to the Commission, have become effective. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 11741 (October 15,1975).

27 15 U.S.C. 78q and 78ff (a ).33 See note 10, supra.“ Revised Form BD became effective on

October 1, 1975. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 11530 (June 10, 1975), 40 FR 30636 (1975).

24 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 11487 (June 20,1975), 40 FR 27441 (1975).

PART 200— ORGANIZATION, CONDUCT AND ETHICS; AND INFORMATION AND REQUESTSSection 200.30-3(a) is amended by

adding a new paragraph (14) thereto, and 17 CFR 200.30-11 (a) is amended by adding a new paragraph (2) thereto, each to read as follows:

§ 200.30—3 Delegation of authority to Director of Division of Market Regulation.$ * ♦ * *

(a) * * *(14) Pursuant to section 15B(a) of

the Act C15 U.S.C. 78o-4(a) 1, to authorize the issuance of orders granting registration of municipal securities dealers within forty-five days of the filing of an application for registration as a municipal securities dealer (or within such longer period as to which the applicant consents).

* * * * *§ 200.30—11 Delegation of authority to

Director, Office of Registration and Reports.* * ♦ * *

(a) * * *(2) Pursuant to section 15B(a) of the

Act £ 15 U.S.C, 78o-4(a)l, to authorize the issuance of orders granting registration of municipal securities dealers within forty-five days of the filing of an application for registration as a municipal securities dealer (or within such longer period as to which the applicant consents).

* * * * * *

PART 240— GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934The text of temporary rule 15a-l(T),

rules 15Ba2-l and 15Ba2-2 and temporary rule 15Ba -3(T), as hereby adopted is as follows (§ 240.15a—1(T ) Temporary exemption

of municipal securities brokers and municipal securities dealers from the requirements of section 1 5 (a )(1 ) of the act.

A municipal securities broker or municipal securities dealer otherwise subject to the requirements of section 15(a)(1) of the Act by reason of being a municipal securities broker or municipal securities dealer, shall be exempt from the requirements of such section, provided such broker or dealer shall be in compliance with each of the following terms and conditions:

(a) Such broker or dealer shall have filed with the Commission not later than November 30, 1975 an application for registration pursuant to rule 15b 1-1 (§ 240.15b 1-1) and all other statements and reports required to be filed with the Commission in connection with such application pursuant to rule 15bl-2 (§ 240.- 15b 1-2) or otherwise;

(b) Such broker or dealer shall at all times be in compliance with all other applicable provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder and the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, including all such provisions, rules and regulations which by their terms would apply to such dealer if such dealer were registered with the Commission on December 1, 1975; and

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER

(c) Such exemption shall terminate on the earlier of (1) the date of an order of the Commission granting such broker’s or dealer’s registration under section 15(b) (1) of the Act, or (2) the. date of an order of the Commission denying such broker’s or dealer’s registration under such section 15(b) (1) of the Act, or (3) of the date of such broker’s or dealer’s failure to comply with the conditions of this rule.This temporary rule shall expire on June 1, 1976.§ 240.15Ba2—1 Application for registra

tion of municipal securities dealers which are banks or separately identifiable departments or divisions of banks.

(a) An application for registration, pursuant to Section 15B(a) of the Act, of a municipal securities dealer which is a bank (as defined in section 3(a) (6) of the Act) or a separately identifiable department or division of a bank (as defined by the Municipal Securities Rule- making Board), shall be filed with the Commission on Form MSD (§ 249.950 of this chapter), in accordance with the instructions contained therein.

(b) If the information contained in any application for registration pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, or in any amendment to such application, is or bqcomes inaccurate for any reason, applicant shall promptly file an amendment on Form MSD (§ 249.950 of this chapter) correcting such information.

(c) Every amendment filed pursuant to this rule shall constitute a “report” within the meaning of sections 17 and 32(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78q and 78ff(a)).§ 240.15Ba2—2 Application for registra

tion of non-bank municipal securities dealers whose business is exclusively intrastate.

(a) An application for registration, pursuant to section 15B(a) of the Act, Of a municipal securities dealer not subject to the requirements of rule 15Ba2-l (§ 240.15Ba2-l), shall be filed with the Commission on Form BD (§ 249.501 of this chapter) in accordance with the instructions contained therein.

(b) Each applicant for registration who is subject to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section shall file with the application for registration prescribed in such paragraph the statements described in paragraphs (a) through (d) of rule 15bl-2 (§240.15bl- 2). The statement of financial condition described in such paragraph (a) shall be deemed a part of the application for registration. Each applicant shall also file with its application for registration a statement to the effect that such applicant is filing for registration as an intrastate dealer in accordance with the requirements of this rule. Such statement shall be deemed a part of the application for registration.

(c) If the information contained in any application for registration pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, or in any

24, 1975

RULES AND REGULATIONS 49Î77amendment to such application, is or becomes inaccurate for any reason, applicant shall promptly file an amendment on Form BD (§ 249.501 of this chapter) correcting such information.

(d) Every amendment filed pursuant to this rule shall constitute a “report" within the meaning of sections 17 and 32(a) of the Act.§ 240.15Ba2—3(T ) Temporary exemp

tion of municipal securities dealers from the requirements of section 15B(a) of the act.

A municipal securities dealer otherwise subject to the requirements of section 15B(a) of the Act shall be exempt from the requirements of such section, provided such dealer shall be in compliance with each of the following terms and conditions:

(a) such municipal securities dealer shall have filed with the Commission not later than November 30, 1975 an application for registration pursuant to rule 15Ba2-l (§ 240.15Ba2-l) or rule 15Ba2-2 (§ 240.15Ba2-2), as appropriate, and all other statements and reports required to be filed with the Commission in connection with such application;

(b) such municipal securities dealer shall at all times be in compliance with all other applicable provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder and the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, including all such provisions, rules and regulations which by their terms would apply to such municipal securities dealer if .such dealer were registered with the Commission on December 1, 1975; and

(c) such exemption shall terminate on the earlier of (1) the date of an order of the Commission granting such municipal securities dealer’s registration under section 15B(a) of the Act, of (2) the date of an order of the Commission denying such municipal securities dealer’s registration under such section 15B (a) of the Act, or (3) the date of such municipal securities dealer’s failure to comply with the conditions of this rule.This temporary rule shall expire on June h 1976.

PART 249— FORMS, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

tion 15B(a) of thè Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) , or to amend such application.

Note. Copies of Form MSD have been filed with the Office of the Federal Register as part of this document.

(b) Copies of Forms BD and MSD may be obtained from the Office of Reports and Information Services, Securities and Exchange Commission, 500 North Capitol Street, Washington, D.C. 20549. Only printed copies of Form MSD should be used to apply for registration with the Commission.

[FRDoc.75-28682 Filed 10-21-75;3:08 pm]

Title 23—-HighwaysCHAPTER I— FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMIN

ISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUBCHAPTER H— RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ENVIRONMENT

PART 750— HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION Outdoor Advertising Control

CorrectionIn FR Doc. 75-24523 appearing at page

42842 as the Part IH of the issue of Tuesday, September 16, 1975, in the third column on page 42845, in the second line of § 750.705(c), “1 1750.704(a) (1) ” should read “§ 750.704(a) (1)

Title 24— Housing and Urban DevelopmentCHAPTER II— OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SEC

RETARY FOR HOUSING PRODUCTION AND MORTGAGE CREDIT-FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER [FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION], DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS

[Docket No. R-75-357]DEBENTURE INTEREST RATES

Insurance RatesThe following amendments have been

made to this chapter to change the debenture interest rate. The Secretary has determined that advance publication and notice and public procedure are unnecessary sincejhe debenture interest rate is set by the Secretary of the Treasury in accordance with a procedure established by statute and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective July 1,1975.

249—Forms, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is hereby amended by adding Subpart K and § 249.950 to that subpart as follows:Subpart K-—Forms for registration of

municipal securities dealers§ 249.950 Form MSD, Application for

registration as a municipal securities dealer pursuant to rule 15B a2-l under the Securities Exchange Act

or amendment to such application.

(a) This Form is to be used by a bank or a separately identifiable department or division of a bank (as defined by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board) to apply for registration as a municipal securities dealer with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to sec-

Accordingly, Chapter n is amended as follows:PART 203— MUTUAL MORTGAGE INSUR

ANCE AND INSURED HOME IMPROVEMENT LOANS1. Section 203.405 is revised to read as

follows:§ 203.405 Debenture interest rate.

Debentures shall bear interest from the date of issue, payable semi-annually on the first day of January and the first day of July of each year a t the rate in effect as of the date the commitment was Issued, or as of the date the mortgage was endorsed for insurance, whichever rate is higher. The following interest rates are effective for the dates listed:

Effective rate (percent) On or after— Prior to—

6*6................... .................... .. Jan. 1,1971 July 1,19715*6......................................... . July 1,1971 Jan. 1,19725*6......................................... . Jan. 1,1972 July l, 19725*i...........................: ............ .5 ) f c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —. . . . . . .

. July 1,1972 Jan. 1,1973

. Jan. 1,1973 July 1,19736............................................. .. July 1,1973 Jan. 1,19746*6................................... . Jan. 1,1974 July 1,19746*6— -------------- . . . . ____7............................................ .

. July

. July1.19741.1975

July 1,1975

(Sec. 211, 52 Stat. 23; (12 U.S.C. 1715b). Interprets or applies sec. 203, 52 Stat. 10, as amended; (12 U.S.C. 1709) )

2. Section 203.479 is revised to read as follows:§203.479 Debenture interest rate.

Debentures shall bear interest from the date of issue, payable semiannually on the first day of January and the first day of July of each year a t the rate in effect as of the date the commitment was issued, or as of the date the loan was endorsed for insurance, whichever rate is the higher. The following interest rates are effective for the dates listed: .

Effective rate (percent) On or after— Prior to—

6*6-5*6-5*6.5*6.5*1-6...6*6 .6*6 -7 . . .

Jan. 1,1971 July Ju ly 1,1971 Jan . Jan. 1,1972 July Ju ly l, 1972 Jan. Jan. 1.1973 July July 1,1973 Jan. Jan. 1,1974 July July 1,1974 July July 1,1975

1.19711.19721.19721.19731.19731.19741.19741.1975

(Sec. 211, 52 Stat. 23; (12 U.S.C. 1715b). Interprets or applies sec. 203, 52 Stat. 10, as amended; (12 U.S.C. 1709) )

PART 207— MULTIFAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE INSURANCE

In § 207.259 paragraph (e) (6) is amended to read as follows:§ 207.259 Insurance benefits.

♦ * * * *(e) Issuance of debentures. • * •(6) Bear interest from the date of

issue, payable semiannually on the first day of January and first day of July of each year a t the rate in effect as of the date the commitment was issued, or as of the date of initial insurance endorsement of the mortgage, whichever rate is the higher. The following interest rates are effective for the dates listed:

Effective rate (percent) On or a f te r - Prior to—

6X-6.J.6*£.6*|.7 . . .

Jan.JulyJan.JulyJan.JulyJan.JulyJuly

1.19711.19711.19721.19721.19731.19731.19741.19741.1975

JulyJan.Ju lyJan.JulyJan.JulyJuly

1.19711.19721.19721.19731.19731.19741.19741.1975

(Sec. 211, 52 Stat. 23; (12 UJS.C. 1715b) Interprets or applies sec. 207, 52 Stat. 16, as amended; (12 U.S.C. 1713) )

• • *

PART 220— URBAN RENEWAL MORTGAGE INSURANCE AND INSURED IMPROVEMENT LOANSSection 220.830 is revised to read as

follows:



§ 220.830 Debenture interest rate.Debentures shall bear interest from

the date of issue, payable semiannually on the first day of January and the first day of July of each year a t the rate in effect as of the date the commitment was issued, or as of the date the loan was endorsed for insurance, whichever rate is higher. The following interest rates are effective for the dates listed:

Effective ra te (percent) O n or aft«?— P rio r to—

6 V»............................................ .. Jan . 1,1971 Ju ly 1,19716 % ............................................ .. Ju ly 1,1971 Jan . 1,1972&%............................................ .. Jan . 1,1972 Ju ly 1,1972b M — ........................................ Ju ly 1,1972 Jan . 1,1973B A .............................•_............. .. Jan . 1,1973 Ju ly 1,19736 . ...................... ............. .......... . Ju ly 1,1973 Jan . 1,1974

II

I

l i

l 1

1 1

I ‘;t , r ’ »

4. Ii

liII 1

1

1 li

I - I i

II

I1

1 »

fiil 1

1 I

II

1

1 1

1 i

« I

II

^

:

. J an . 1,1974 Ju ly 1,1974

. Ju ly

. Ju ly1.19741.1975

Ju ly 1,1975

(Sec. 211, 52 Stat. 23; (12 TT.S.C. 1715b). Interprets or applies sec. 220, 68 Stat. 596, as amended; (12 U.S.C. 1715k) )

Effective date. These amendments are effective as of July 1, 1975.(It is hereby certified that the economic and inflationary impact of this regulation has been carefully evaluated in accordance with OMB A—107).

S anford A. Witkowski, Acting Assistant Secretary-

Commissioner for Housing Production and Mortgage Credit.

(FB Doc.75-28723 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

Title 41— -Public Contract and Property Management

CHAPTER 101— FEDERAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS

SUBCHAPTER 6 —TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES

[FPMB Temp. Beg. G-23]PART 101-41— AUDIT OF

TRANSPORTATION PAYMENTSCorrection

In PR Doc. 75-27591 appearing at page 47941 as the Part m of the issue of Friday, October 10, 1975, the following changes should be made:

1. In the Table of Contents appearing in the first column on page 47943:

a. The fourth entry how reading “101- 41.210-1 Use of redemption of unused tickets, SP 1170” should read “101-41.- 210-1. Use of Redemption of Unused Tickets, SP 1170".

b. The eighteenth entry reading “101- 41.214 Billing and payment erf pas-” should be deleted.

2. In the third column on page 47947, the entry now reading “§ 101-41.210-1 Use of redemption of unused tickets, SF 1170” should read “§ 101-41.210-1 Use of Redemption of Unused Tickets, SP 1170”.

3. In the middle column on page 47951, the twelfth line of § 101-41.303-4 Should be deleted and the following should be inserted in lieu thereof: “already been completed, the recovered”.

4. On page 47953, delete “a t destina- tioin” appearing in the third line of § 101-41.309-2(b) (1) and insert “trailers) shipped” in place of.

Title 47— TelecommunicationCHAPTER I— FEDERAL

COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [FCO 75-11611

PART 0— COMMISSION ORGANIZATION PART 1— PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chicago Regional OfficeOrder—Proceeding terminated. In the

matter of amendment of Parts 0 and 1 of the Commission’s rules to effect the transfer of the Chicago Regional Office operating element to the Safety and Special Radio Services Bureau.

1. On June 12, 1975, the Commission adopted the Report on Restructuring the Spectrum Management Task Force, dated June 6, 1975, and ordered that the operating element of the Chicago Regional Office, Spectrum Management Task Force, as defined in the Report, be transferred from the Office of the Chief Engineer to the Safety and Special Radio Services Bureau.

2. In view of the operational status of the licensing functions and automated processing programs, the Commission decided that the public interest would be served by the transfer of all operating elements, with the exception of the Spectrum Utilization (Monitoring) Section. This group will remain under the control of the Spectrum Management Task Force in the Office of the Chief Engineer for research and development activities related to the enhancement and improvement of the land mobile Spectrum Management Program; it will also continue to incorporate current, valid monitoring data into the existing data base to support the operational functions. After the monitoring procedures in Chicago have been tested and proven, the Commission will consider the transf er of this group to the Safety and Special Radio Services Bureau.

3. Certain additional authority has been delegated to the Chief, Safety and Special Radio Services Bureau, to permit the continued licensing of remote pickup broadcast stations in the Chicago Region and to authorize Chicago to make decisions regarding the construction, marking and lighting of antenna towers arid supporting structures. This additional delegation does not expand the authority of the Bureau Chief outside of designated Regions.

4. Authority for adopting this order is contained in section 5(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Since it relates to internal Commission management, practice, and procedure, and because the early implementation of these changes will result in more efficient operation, compliance with the notice and effective date provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 is not required.

5. Accordingly, it is ordered, That, effective October 28,1975, §§ 0.132 and 1.61 of the rules are amended, and that § 0.334 is added, in the manner set forth below.(Secs. 4, 5, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1068, 1082; (47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 303) )

Adopted: October 15,1975.Released: October 21,1975.

F ederal Communications ' Commission,1

[ seal] Vincent J. Mullins,Secretary.

Parts 0 and 1 of Chapter I of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as follows:

A. In Part 0—Commission Organization:

1. Section 0.132 (d) and (e) are amended, and a new paragraph (f) is added to read as follows;§ 0.132 Units in the Bureau.

The detailed operations of the Bureau are performed within six major units, as follows:

* * * * *(d) Aviation and Marine Division;

(e) Amateur and Citizens Division; and

(f) Regional Management Staff.2. Section 0.334 is added as follows:

§ 0.334 Additional Authority delegated to the Chief, Safety and Special Radio Services Bureau.

Insofar as the operation of the regional center is concerned, the Chief of the Safety and Special Radio Services Bureau is delegated authority to exercise the following functions:

(a) In accordance with applicable rules, authority to act on all applications filed in a region in the Remote Pickup Broadcast Service (shared frequencies only) for construction permits, station licenses, modification of station licenses, renewal of station licenses, and special temporary authorizations.

(b) Except as otherwise provided in § 1.61 of this chapter, with respect to the construction, marking and lighting of antenna towers and supporting structures, authority as set forth in Part 17 of this chapter to exercise the functions of the Commission in designated Regions.

1. In § 1.61, paragraph (a) is amended to read as follows:§ 1.61 Procedures for handling applica

tions requiring Special Aeronautical Study.

(a) Except for those services and in those areas being managed by the Regional Management Staff of the Safety and Special Radio Services Bureau, antenna surveys are conducted by the Antenna Survey Branch of the Regional Services Division, Field Operations Bureau.

* * • • »[FB Doc.75-28675 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 am)

i Commissioner Reid absent.


RULES AND REGULATIONS 49779[Docket No. 18262* FCC 75-832J

PART 2— FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS

PART 18— INDUSTRIAL, SCIENTIFIC, AND MEDICAL EQUIPMENT

PART 21— DOMESTIC PUBLIC RADIO SERVICES (OTHER THAN MARITIME MOBILE)

PART 73— RADIO BROADCAST SERVICESPART 74— EXPERIMENTAL, AUXILIARY,

AND SPECIAL BROADCAST, AND OTHER PROGRAM DISTRIBUTIONAL SERVICESPART 89— PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO

SERVICESPART 91— INDUSTRIAL RADIO SERVICES

PART 93— LAND TRANSPORTATION RADIO SERVICES

Land Mobile ServicesMemorandum opinion and order—Ter

minating proceeding. In the matter of an inquiry relative to the future use of the frequency band 806-960 MHz; and amendment of Parts 2, 18, 21, 73, 74, 89, 91, and 93 of the rules relative to operations in the land mobile services between 806 and 960 MHz, Docket No. 18262.

1. We have before us for consideration pleadings filed by a number of parties to this proceeding * seeking reconsideration of certain orders adopted by us in this rule making. “Land Mobile Radio Seryice, Second Report and Order,” Docket No. 18262, 46 FCC 2d 752 (1974) ,39 FR 16831 (May 10, 1974), “on reconsideration, Land Mobile Radio Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order,” Docket No. 18262, 51 FCC 2d 938 (1975),40 FR 14451 (March 31, 1975) and corrected at 40 FR 17130, April 16,1975. The issues raised by these parties are all related; and we will review and dispose of

’•them together in this opinion.2. First, Airsignal, GTESC and NARS

ask that we reconsider a number of findings and conclusions as to our regulatory plan for cellular, trunked and conventional systems of communication. They want thesit matters decided in a different way; and advance reasons and arguments in support of the positions they

1 Petition for Reconsideration and Suggestion for Suspension of Effective Date, filed April 30, 1975, by the National Association of Radiotelephone Systems (NARS); Petition for Partial Reconsideration,, filed April 30, 1975, by GTE Service Corporation (GTESC), and Comments by Airsignal International, Inc. (Airsignal), filed AprU 30, 1975. Response to Petition for Reconsideration, filed May 23, 1975, by the General Electric Company (General Electric). And additionally. Petition for Clarification Or, Alternatively, for a Declaratory Ruling and Supplement to Petition for Clarification, filed by General Electric on May 23, 1975, and June 23, 1975, respectively. And lastly, Petition to Refrain from Granting Licenses Pursuant to Applications filed for Authorization in the 900 MHz Band Involving Entrepreneurial Community Repeater Operations, submitted June 19, 1975. by NARS, Mid the responsive pleadings directed the NARS petition and to General Electric’s Supplemental Request of June 23 ,1975.

take. However, upon review, we find that the issues they raise and the arguments they advance in support of their positions are substantially the same, if not identical, to those previously raised and were disposed of in our previous opinions and orders in this proceedings. Nevertheless, since some changes were made in our original decision, we have considered these arguments, but we are not persuaded to modify our orders on the questioned points; and accordingly, we affirm the Second Report and Order as modified on prior reconsideration by the referenced Memorandum Opinion and Order of March, 1975.

3. In addition, General Electric and NARS ask that we clarify our orders with respect to possible licensing of “community repeaters” a t 900 MHz.* Both General Electric and NARS feel that authorization of such “mobile relay” systems under existing “multiple licensing” practices would be contrary to our announced regulatory scheme for “conventional” and “trunked” facilities in this band, with NARS also contending that ■“multiple licensing” would be in conflict with the Court’s stay order in this case.*

4. As to these matters, we want no confusion as to the licensing policies to be followed at 900 MHz; and we would not, of Course, take any action which we believed would be inconsistent with the referenced mandate of the Court of Appeals. Thus, we will grant the relief General Electric and NARS ask to the extent of clarifying our orders in the areas to which these parties direct our attention.

5. Parenthetically, as to “multiple licensing,” we would point out that the term simply denotes the administrative practice followed by us for many years in authorizing certain types of sharing arrangements in the Public Safety, Industrial, and Land Transportation Radio Services. Under these arrangements, an “eligible user” is issued an individual license to “time share” a particular radio transmitter with other" “eligible users” (who are also individually licensed) in situations in which it is feasible for him to do so.

6. In such cases, each “user” (eligible) is the “licensee." He. thus, is the person upon whom we confer the “right to operate” on the “assigned frequency or frequencies.” He is the one who is held responsible to us for employing the system

* “Community repeater” operation - Is described in some detail in our notice in Docket No. 18921. We rely on that description and will not redefine the arrangement here. See Multiple Licensing—Safety and Special Radio Services, Docket No. 18921, infra, at para. 8.

3 See Order, June 10, 1975, United States Court of Appeals'for the District of Columbia Circuit, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, et al. v. Federal Communication Commission, et al.. Case Nos. 74—1585, 74-1659, and 74—1696. In pertinent part, the Order recites: “* * * that the FCC order under review is stayed pending appeal to the extent that it authorizes the assignment or operation of radio spectrum space to Specialized Mobil Radio Systems:”

only for authorized purposes. He may use it only to transmit “permissible communications;” and he may operate the “R F ” device licensed to him only in ways that are consistent with the “service” in which his station is licensed.

7. The equipment company involved in the arrangement4 has no parallel rights or privileges. It cannot operate the system. It'is not entitled (as the “licensee" is) to “use” the “assigned” portion of the “radio spectrum” for any purpose, i.e., the rights of the “licensee” do not extend to the third-party equipment company. And, significantly we think, should the ‘‘licensee” abandon the “use” of the supplier’s radio gear, the “assigned spectrum” follows the “licensee” and the equipment company has no residual rights insofar as its “use” is concerned. Thus, statutory rights pertaining to renewal of licenses do not apply to it. Those dealing with modification of licenses are not ones that it can resort to. Nor do the provisions of Section 312 of the Act (revocation) afford such a business entrepreneur procedural recourse of any kind. In summary, then, in the “private” land mobile radio services, particularly in the environment in which those services have been constituted, the role of the equipment supplier is just that, i.e., a person who supplies equipment.

8. While we have recognized some problems with our “multiple licensing” practices, those are being reviewed in our rule-making proceeding in Docket No. 18921. “Multiple Licensing—Safety and Special Radio Services,” Docket No. 18921, 24 FCC 2d ¿10 (1970) , 35 FR 12007 (July 25, 1970). There we are studying the matter in the full light of the comments filed by the parties to that proceeding with a view toward possible strengthening our regulatory procedures applicable to that practice. However, we made it clear in that Docket that we* intended to continue the practice as one which is “not unlawful” and which is “often necessary and desirable” in the public interest. “Multiple Licensing- Safety and Special Radio Services,” supra, at p. 518. In these circumstances, we do not believe we should foreclose the benefits of “multiple licensing” at 900 MHz, particularly in light of our deter- ' ruinations in that proceeding.

9. In short, while there are some “similarities” between the sharing arrangements authorized under our licensing practices for “community repeaters” and those that are to apply to Specialized Mobile Radio Systems, to be “licensed”

4 In every case, whether it Involves an arrangement in the “private” services or a common carrier operation, there must be some third party to manufacture and supply and, at times, to maintain the physical radio gear used in systems of radiotelecommunication, I.e., in systems In which messages are transmitted through space by means of radiated energy of electromagnetic waves. And this is so regardless of whether the generator (transmitter) of electromagnetic waves is shared or not.



under § 89.604(c) of the new Subpart S,B we do not view them as substantive likenesses which require the conclusion NARS suggests. I t should be emphasized that under § 89.604(c) an entrepreneur, who need not be otherwise eligible for licensing as a user, .would be assigned (“licensed to use”} a portion of the radio spectrum to provide radio service to eligible users. This is not the case with the “community repeater” arrangements we refer to.

10. Thus, we looked upon SMRS licensing as “an important additional option for eligibles in” the Public Safety, industrial, and Land Transportation Radio Services (Land Mobile Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No.-18262, supra, at p. 956), and “multiple licensing” was not specifically excluded. However, we acknowledge that the practice may have limited application at 900 MHz. There we plan to assign frequencies on a “first-in” “first-out” basis and there will also be “vertical” loading. These features will for practical reasons restrict ‘ multiple licensing” of “community repeaters.” But, to be clear, “multiple licensing” is not barred under our new Subpart S regulations; nor do we feel the Court intended its mandate to extend to this established administrative practice. We do not so construe the Court’s order.

11. In view of the foregoing: It is ordered, That the referenced petitions for reconsideration filed by the National Association of Radiotelephone Systems, GTE Service Corporation, and Airsignal International, Inc., on April 30, 1975, are denied,

12. It is further ordered, That the “Suggestion for Suspension of Effective Date,” filed April 30, 1975, by the National Association of Radiotelephone. Systems, is denied.

13. It is further ordered, That the Petition for Clarification Or, Alternatively, for A Declaratory Ruling, filed May 23, 1975, by the General Electric Company, and the Petition to Refrain from Granting Licenses Pursuant to Applications filed for Authorization in the 900 MHz Band Involving Entrepreneurial Community Repeater Operations, filed June 19, 1975, by the National Association of Radiotelephone Systems, to the extent indicated in the opinion above, are granted.

14. I t is further ordered, That the Supplement to Petition for Clarification,

B Section 89.604(c) pertains to “eligibility” for “licensing” and reads: “Any person or entity * * * proposing to provide, on a commercial basis, base station and ancilliary facilities for the use of persons or entities eligible under Part 89, 91, or 93 of this chapter.” It creates a “new” eligibility classification: permits “operation” of a “new” class of radio station; and extends our “licensing” processes to a “new” type of arrangement created under and structured through our “new” 900-MHz allocation and assignment and licensing processes and procedures and practices.

filed June 23, 1975, by the General Electric Company, is dismissed as moot.

15. I t is further ordered, That this proceeding is terminated.

Adopted: July 16,1975.Released: July 18,1975.

F ederal Communications Commission,®

[seal] Vincent J. Mullins,Secretary.

[PR Doc.75-28677 Piled 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Docket No. 20490; PCC 75-1073]PART 21— DOMESTIC PUBLIC RADIO

SERVICES (OTHER THAN MARITIME MOBILE)

Various Procedural Requirements for the Domestic Public Radio Services

CorrectionIn FR Doc. 75-27158 appearing a t page

47496 in the issue of Thursday, October 9, 1975, the fifth line of the second column on page 47500 reading “amended as appropriate and shall not” should read “answered as appropriate and shall not”.

[Docket No. 19784]PART 73— RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

FM Broadcast Stations in Certain Cities in Md.

First report and order. In the matter of amendment of § 73.202(b), Table of assignments, FM Broadcast Stations, (Grasonville, Leonardtown, and Lexington Park, Maryland), Docket No. 19784, RM-1995, RM-2036.

1. The Commission has before it for consideration the notice of proposed rulemaking released herein on July 9, 1973 (38 FR 18689) inviting comments on alternative proposals to amend the FIÀ Table of Assignments, § 73.202(b) of the rules, in response to petitions of Edward Mason De Maso (De Maso), Grasonville, Maryland (RM—1995) and of Sound Media, Inc. (Sound Media), licensee of AM Station WKJLK, Leonardtown, Maryland (RM—2036), for the assignment of first FM channels to Grasonville and Lexington Park, Maryland. These alternative proposals, which would provide either Grasonville (Proposal I) or Lexington Park (Proposal H) or both communities (Proposal HI) with a first FM assignment, are as follows:

•CityChannel No.

Present Proposed

PR O PO SA L I (DE MASÓ, RM-1905)

Grasonville, M d . . . . . . . . . . .............................. 276À

OR PR O PO SA L II (SOUND M EDIA, RM-2036)

Leonardtown, Md.............Lexington Park, Md-------

249A ' 276A .............................. 246A

» Commissioners Wiley, Chairman; Reid and Washburn concurring in the result.

OR PRO PO SA L I I I (DE MASO C O U N T E R P R O POSAL, RM-2036)

Grasonville, M d ..- .l ..— ........ ........ . .—— 276ALexington Park, M d .. . . . ............................ . 240A

2. Proposal I, advanced by De Maso to provide Grasonville with a first FM assignment for which it could apply, conflicts with Proposal H,1 advanced by Sound Media to resolve the conflict between its application for the Leonardtown Channel 249A assignment and the mutually exclusive application of Key Broadcasting Corporation (Key), licensee of AM Station WPTX, Lexington Park, for use of Channel 249A for a first FM station at Lexington Park in accordance with the “10-mile” rule,2 by providing both communities with an assignment.® Proposal HI, advanced by De Maso as a counterproposal to Sound

.Media’s proposal H to resolve the conflict between Proposal I and Proposal H and enable all three communities to have an FM assignment for local use, presents a technically feasible way of providing both Grasonville and Lexington Park

1 The conflict between Proposal I and Proposal n exists because mileage separation requirements prevent Channel 276A from being assigned to both Grasonville and Leonardtown.

2Section 73.203(b) of the rules. This rule permits application to be made for use of a Class A assignment in a community not listed- in the PM Table of Assignments (such as Lexington Park) when the Class A assignment sought is assigned to a listed community within ten miles of the unlisted community (such as Lexington Park is with respect to Leonardtown since they are about 9 miles apart).

3 The competing Sound Media and Key applications for the Leonardtown Channel 249A assignment were designated for consolidated hearing by Order, released February 1* 1972 (PCC 73-78). Following hearing, the Administrative Law Judge released an initial Decision on March 11, 1974 (PCC 74D-18), proposing to grant the Key application (BPH- 6540, Docket No. 19410) and to deny the Sound Media application (BPH-6886, Docket No. 19411). Following oral argument before the Review Board on exceptions to the Initial Decision filed by the parties, on January 2, 1975, the Review Board released a Decision which reversed the Initial Decision on these competing applications by granting the application of Sound Media for a Leonardtown Channel 248A facility and denying the competing Key application for a Lexington Park Channel 249A facility. (50 P.C.C. 2d 337) In its Decision the Board disagreed with the finding in the Initial Decision that Key did not warrant disqualification on two misrepresentation issues. The Board stated that the evidence under the misrepresentation issues against Key “demonstrates that Key has not met the standards of candor and accuracy which the Commission expects of its licensees, and that its application for an additional broadcast facility therefore must be denied.” The Board also stated that since the competing applicant, Sound Media, was frilly qualified, its application would be granted. By Memorandum Opinion and Order, released April 17, 1975 (FCC 75R-162), the Review

, Board also denied a petition for reconsideration of its Decision filed by Key. An application for Commission review, filed by Key on May 14, 1975, is awaiting action.



with first PM assignments without disturbing the Leonardtown Channel 249A assignment or other existing assignments.

3. Both petitioners, De Maso and Sound Media, support Proposal m in their comments. Since the Proposal i n plan for Lexington Park (240A) and Leonardtown (249A) would not conflict with his Grasonville Channel 276A proposal, De Maso urges that the Grasonville Channel 276A proposal be separated and removed from this proceeding and acted upon. Key, the only other commenting party, takes no position on any of the three proposals but states that it does not necessarily oppose Proposal HI, which would assign Channel 240A to Lexington Park, provided that in thus making Lexington Park a “listed community” in the FM Table of Assignments, its competing application for the Leonardtown Channel 249A assignment in the proceeding discussed in footnote 4, supra, would remain valid and in “protected status”. Since “character issues” against it are involved, it contends that justice requires this.

4. Since only Proposal III of the proposals before us has potential for providing FM assignments at Grasonville, Leonardtown and Lexington Park, and it also has the support of both petitioners and is unopposed by Key, we may dispense with further consideration of con- flictjing Proposals I and n and limit our consideration to Proposal m . In this First Report, however, besides denying Proposals I and n , we consider and dispose only of the proposal in Proposal I I I » to assign Channel 276A to Grasonville. The assignment proposed for Lexington Park in Proposal i n (Channel 240A) will be considered and acted upon in another document after the Leonardtown Channel 249A adjudicatory proceeding is; finally concluded. (See footnote 2, supra.) This procedure is appropriate and desirable, we believe, since, in view of the technical compatibility of the FM assignments proposed for Grasonville and Lexington Park in Proposal III, these proposals need not be considered jointly, and, while we feel that consideration of the Lexington Park assignment proposal should be deferred until final resolution of tiie Leonardtown Channel 249A proceeding since Key is the only party to express interest in establishing an FM station at Lexington Park, there is no reason to also defer consideration and action on the unopposed Grasonville assignment proposal.

5. Grasonville (population 1,182) is an unincorporated community located in Queen Annes County (population 18,422) on what is commonly known as the Maryland Eastern Shore (east of Chesapeake Bay, approximately 16 miles east of Annapolis, Maryland, the .State capital.4 The community is bisected by Maryland Route 50 and U.S. 301 which are- used by tourists to reach eastern seaboard resort areas to the north and

4 Population figures are from the 1970 U.S, Census.

south, such as Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, and Ocean City, 'Maryland, from the parallel Chesapeake Bay bridges. It appears, as De Maso claims, that, because of their geographic location, both Queen Annes County (which stretches from Chesapeake Bay to the Delaware border). and Grasonville have increased growth potential as a result of the second Bay bridge opening in 1973. As the Notice discussed in greater detail, De Maso’s prior showing also indicates that Grasonville (formerly called Winchester) has all the indicia of a community, with many thriving businesses and resort facilities, and has become one of the area’s largest seafood packing house complexes with eight packing houses.

6. At present there are no aural broadcast stations in Queen Annes County, no FM assignment, and but two weekly newspapers. While Annapolis and Baltimore, Maryland, radio stations, and others located in Delaware, are received in the county, De Maso claims that none of them attempt to meet the needs and interests of Queen Annes County residents. De Maso affirms his intention to apply for use of the requested channel (276A) once it is assigned to Grasonville and, if authorized, to construct and operate a station to servé the area in the public interest.

7. In view of the foregoing, we find it in the public interest to provide Grasonville with a first FM assignment to meet the demand and need shown for a first local FM service in that area. Since Chanríel 276A is technically suitable for that purpose and may be assigned without disturbing any existing FM assignment or conflicting with the assignment proposed for Lexington Park (240A) in Proposal HI, Which will be acted upon a t a later date, it will be assigned to Grasonville.

8. Accordingly, and pursuant to authority contained in sections 4(1), 5(d)(1), 303, and 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and § 0.281(b) (6) of the Commission rules, It is ordered, That, effective December 1, 1975, the FM Table of Assignments, § 73.202(b) of the rules, is amended to read as follows for the city listed below:

City Channel No.Grasonville, Maryland _______________ 276A

9. It is further ordered, That the request of De Maso to sever and act upon the Grasonville portion of Proposal i n is granted, and

10. It is further ordered, That Proposal I of De Maso and Proposal n of Sound Media are denied.(Secs. 4, 303, 307, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1082, 1083; (47 UJ3.C. 164, 303, 307))


F ederal Communications Commission,

[seal] W allace E. J ohnson.Chief, Broadcast Bureau.

[FR Doc.75-28678 Filed 10-23-75; 8:46 am]

{Docket No. 20212; FCC 75-1162]PART S3— STATIONS ON SHIPBOARD

IN THE MARITIME SERVICESEligibility Requirements of Applicants for

Public Ship Station LicensesReport and orders. In the matter of

amendment of Part 83—regarding the eligibility requirements of applicants for public ship station licenses.

1. A notice of proposed rulemaking in the above-captioned matter was released on October 25, 1974, and was published in the F ederal R egister on November 5, 1974, (39 FR 39054) . The dates for filing comments and replies have passed.'2. Comments were filed by: American

Institute of Merchant Shipping (AIMS), Collins Radio Group (Collins), Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company (GLDD), Great Lakes Towing Company (GLTC), ITT World Communications, Inc. (ITT), Lorain Electronics Corporation (Lorain), Ogden Marine, Inc. (Ogden), RCA Global Communications, Inc. (RCA), and Sea-Land Service. Inc. (Sea-Land). Reply comments were filed by RCA Global Communications. Inc. All of the commenters are involved in maritime communication and ITT, Lorain and RCA are existing licensees of numerous radio stations on vessels which they do not own, operate or directly control.

3. The commenters objected to the proposed changes, generally, on the grounds that they provide administrative technical or advisory services which the vessel operators or owners are not capable of performing and that the existing arrangement, therefore, is more efficient and effective. Sea-Land listed the functions rendered by communications organizations to include:

(a) Maintaining a valid and current ship station license;

(b) Arranging for required station safety inspections;

(c) Providing required stationery and publications;

(d) Maintaining familiarity with national and international ship station radio regulations;

(e) Making periodic station inspections ;

(f) Providing abstracting and accounting services for radio call charges; and

(g) Retaining radio station logs for filing.

4. On the basis of the comments filed, it is clear that there has been a misinterpretation of the proposed amendment of 5 83.301(b)(2). Most of the comments are directed to the impact these amendments will have upon organizations rendering service to public ship stations. More specifically, the commenters assume that ITT, Lorain and RCA would or could not, upon adoption of proposed § 83.301(b) (2), continue to provide service to ship radio stations.

5. In fact, the proposed amendment limits licensee eligibility of a public ship station to the owner or operator of the vessel, or to a subsidiary communications corporation of the owner or operator of the vessel. Under the proposed amend-


*49782

ment, ITT, Lorain and RCA would cease to be the licensee of public ship stations. This we believe will place the chain of responsibility in proper perspective. Under section 360 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, the radio installation, the operators, the regulations of their watch, the transmission and receipt of messages, and the radio service of the ship shall in the case of a ship of the United States be under the supreme control of the Master. The Master in turn is controlled by the owner or operator of the vessel. This makes for a logical chain of command.

6. As we stated in our Notice of Proposed Rule Making in this proceeding, when we initially approved the existing licensing arrangement for some ship stations whereby communication companies became the licensees for stations on board ships they did not own or operate, the operators for the stations were provided and assigned by the communication companies as station licensees. Under those circumstances, we concluded the licensees, even though they did not own or opérate the vessels on which the stations were located, could maintain the required degree of station control, through operators that were answerable and responsible to the communication company licensee. With the abandonment of the practice of providing operators for the stations, the owner or operator of the vessel is the person who should be responsible for the operation of the station.

7. I t is not our intention in this proceeding, nor is it pertinent, to render a decision relative to the means employed by the vessel operator* to carry out the f unctions tabulated in items (b) through(g) in paragraph 3, above. The means employed to accomplish those functions is at the option of the public ship station licensee. However, at such time as the ship station license reverts to the vessel operator, the responsibility for carrying out those functions required by the rules will rest with the vessel, operator. Under that responsibility, the vessel operator could, of course, make arrangements to have someone else do the actual work. As concerns citations issued to a vessel, they will continue to be forwarded to the public ship station licensee, as at present. Under the rules, the licensee of that public ship station is required to provide an appropriate response.

8. Several commenters and all of the communications organizations stress the inconvenience, expense and/or waste of manpower which will be caused to the vessel operator if that vessel operator is required to become the licensee of the public ship station. The commenters addressing this matter of inconvenience, expense and/or waste of manpower uniformly project the view, in regard to public ship stations, that preparation of FCC applications and keeping track of license expiration dates requires a minimum of manpower. This being the case, and we believe it to be correct, vessel operators which are members of the American Institute of Merchant Shipping (AIMS) or Lake Carriers Association

RUIES AND' REGULATIONS(LCA), could have AIMS or LCA perform these functions, where they choose not to do them personally. On the other hand, other similar arrangements could be made. The applications would, of course, have to be signed by an official of the concerned shipping company. Li view thereof, we are not persuaded that the proposed amendment of § 83.301(b) (2) would impose inconvenience, expense and/or waste of manpower upon the vessel operator.

9. The rule changes herein adopted will be applied to the licensing of ship stations, after the effective date of this Report and Order, in the following manner:

(a) During the period from the effective date of ‘this Report and Order to October 31, 1976:

An application for a new ship station license will be granted to the owner or operator of the vessel only.

An application for renewal or for modification of an existing ship station license submitted by one of the communication organizations, when granted: will retain the existing expiration date if that date is after October 31, 1976; or will be given a new expiration date (extension of one year) if that date is before November 1, 1976.

An application for renewal or for modification of an existing ship station license, submitted by the owner or operator of the vessel, will be granted for the usual five year period.

b. Effective November 1, 1976, an application for a new ship station license, for renewal, or for modification of a ship station license will be granted to the owner or operator of the vessel only.

10. In promulgating these rule changes, it is not our intent-that a vessel owner or operator, as station licensee, be restricted in renting, chartering, or otherwise giving up possession of a vessel to other persons for short periods of time not to exceed 90 days. We do not disapprove of such arrangements provided the persons actually operating the ship stations have operator permits of the required class and we will look primarily to the vessel owner or operator as station licensee for the proper operation of the station in full compliance with our rules.

11. In view of the foregoing: It is ordered, That pursuant to the authority contained in sections 4(i), 303 (f), (g),(1) and (r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, Part 83 of the Commission’s rules, is amended, effective November 28, 1975, as set forth below.

12. It is further ordered, That vthis proceeding is terminated.(Secs. 4, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1082:. (47 U.S.C. 154, 303) )

Adopted: October 15,1975.Released: October 21, 1975.

F ederal Communications Commission,1

[seal] Vincent J. Mullins,Secretary.

1 Commissioner Reid absent; Commissioner Hooks dissenting.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER

Part 83 of Chapter I, Title 47, Code of Federal Regulations, is amended as follows:

Section 83.301 is revised to read as follows:§ 83.301 Supplemental eligibility re

quirements.(a) Subject to the basic eligibility re

quirements set forth in § 83.23 and to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section, authorizations for:

(1) Limited ship stations or marine utility stations may be granted , to any person, or state or local government subdivision; or any agency of the Federal Government which is subject to the provisions of section 301 of the Communications Act: Provided, That an applicant for an authorization to operate a limited ship station or a marine-utility station must request a frequency assignment on which the transmission of public correspondence is excluded.

(2) Public ship stations1 may be granted only to the owner or operator of the vessel, or to a subsidiary communications corporation of the owner or operator of the vessel, for which station authorization is requested; or state or local government subdivision; or any agency of the Federal Government which is subject to the provisions of section 301 of the Communications Act: Provided, That an applicant for an authorization to operate a public ship station must request a frequency assignment on which the transmission of public correspondence is not excluded by any of the provisions of this part (although additionally he may request any other frequency assignment) .

<b) When the availability of the frequency assignment requested, or any part thereof, is specifically dependent upon the activity and/or the routes of voyage of the vessel, the application shall clearly show eligibility of the vessel for such station authorization under the provisions of this part which govern the assignment of frequencies.

[FR Doc.75-28676 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am)

Title 7— AgriculturePART 51— FRESH FRUITS, VEGETABLES

AND OTHER PRODUCTS (INSPECTION, CERTIFICATION AND STANDARDS)Regulations, Amendments— Fees and

ExpensesCorrection

In FR Doc. 75-27352 appearing at page 47751 in the issue of Friday, October 10,

1 The licensing procedure which will be followed by the Commission during the interim procedure between the èffective date of the Report and Order in Docket No. 20212 and October 31, 1976,-is set forth in paragraph 9 of that Report and Order.

24, 1975

RULES AND REGULATIONS 497831975, in § 51.38, on page 47752, first column, paragraph (a) (2) (ii), now reading:

“(ii) $20.00 for each half-carlot equivalent or less of an individual product"should read as follows:

“(iii) $44.00 maximum for inspection of each carlot equipment when more than”.SUBCHAPTER C— REGULATIONS AND STAND

ARDS UNDER THE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING ACT OF 1946FEDERAL GRADING AND INSPECTION

SERVICESCertain Fees and Charges

Under authority contained in the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.), the U.S. Department of - Agriculture hereby amends the regulations governing the grading and inspection of domestic rabbits and edible products thereof and U.S. specifications for classes, standards,,, and grades with respect thereto (7 CFR Part 54), the regulations governing the voluntary inspection and grading of egg products (7 CFR Part 55), the regulations governing the grading of shell eggs and U.S. standards, grades, and weight classes for shell eggs (7 CFR Part 56), and the regulations governing the grading and inspection of poultry and edible products thereof and U.S. classes, standards, and grades with respect thereto (7 CFR Part 70), as set forth below:

S tatement of Considerations

The costs of furnishing the voluntary resident poultry, egg, and rabbit grading services apd the voluntary egg products inspection service and performing the voluntary nonresident services for such products have steadily risen. Salaries of Federal and State employees have inr creased and other program costs, such as fringe costs, printing supplies, and travel, have also risen. Last year these programs operated on a deficit basis. The Agricultural Marketing Act, under which these programs are conducted, requires that fees charged substantially cover the cosjbs of the programs. Therefore, fees and charges must be increased.

The costs of supervising and administering the voluntary resident programs are recovered through administrative charges based on the volume of product handled in the plant. For resident poultry and egg programs, the amendments increase these charges and change the present system of charging on increments based on a range in volume of poultry and eggs handled per billing period to an established rate per case of. eggs or pound of poultry with minimum and maximum limitations. The new system is designed to provide additional revenue and make it easier to calculate charges. The administrative charges for the voluntary resident rabbit grading and voluntary egg products inspection

programs will continue to be based on 25 percent of the grader’s or inspector’s salary but the amendments increase the minimum charge from $50 to $80 per billing period. This is consistent with the minimum charges for the poultry and egg programs. The increased administrative charges are only the second such adjustment since 1969.

The costs of performing voluntary grading and inspection services on a nonresident basis are recovered through hourly rates. The amendments increase the hourly rates for the nonresident services from $12 to $14 and increase the hourly rates for such services performed on Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays from $15 to $18.48. The fees for laboratory services for individual laboratory tests are increased in accordance with the new hourly rates based on the time required to perform such services plus 10 percent to cover the costs of reagents, breakage, and equipment depreciation. The hourly increases and laboratory test fee increases are only the second adjustments in these fees since 1970.

The hourly rate to be charged for any laboratory analysis not covered by an individual test or for other applicable services performed in the laboratory has been increased from $13.20 to $15.40. The cost of rendering laboratory service has increased proportionately with the cost of providing other services on a nonresident basis. This also makes only the second time hourly laboratory rates have been adjusted since 1970.

The amendments are as follows:

PART 54— GRADING AND INSPECTION OF DOMESTIC RABBITS AND EDIBLE PRODUCTS THEREOF; AND U.S. SPECIFICATIONS FOR CLASSES, STANDARDS, AND GRADES WITH RESPECT THERETO1. In § 54.101, paragraphs <b) and (c)

are amended to read:§ 54.101 On a fee basis.

* * * * *

(b) Fees for grading service will be based on the time required to perform such service for class, quality, quantity (weight test), or condition of ready-to- cook product. The hourly charge shall be $14 and shall include the time actually required to perform the work, waiting time, travel time, and any clerical costs involved in issuing a certificate.

(c) Grading services rendered on Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays shall be charged for at the rate of $18.48 per hour. Information on legal holidays is available from the Supervisor.

* • • * *2. In § 54.108, paragraph (a) (8) is

amended to read:§ 54.108 Continuous grading performed

on a resident basis.* • > • * »

(a) * • •(8) An administrative service charge

equal to 25 percent of the grader’s total

salary costs. A minimum charge, of $80 will be made each billing period.

* * ■ * * *

PART 55— VOLUNTARY INSPECTIONAND GRADING OF EGG PRODUCTS3. In § 55.510, paragraphs (b) and (c)

are amended to read :§ 55.510 Fees and charges for services

other than on a continuous resident basis.* * * * *

(b) Fees for product inspection and sampling for laboratory analysis and appeals will be based on the time required to perform the services. The hourly charge shall be $14 and shall include the time actually required to perform the sampling and inspection, waiting time, travel time, and any clerical costs involved in issuing a certificate.

(c) Services rendered on Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays shall be charged for a t the rate of $18.48 per hour. Information on legal holidays is available from the Supervisor.

* * * * •

4. Section 55.550 is revised to read:§ 55.550 Laboratory analysis fees.

(a) The fees listed for the following individual laboratory analyses cover costs involved in the preparation and analysis of the product, certificate issuance, and personnel and overhead costs other thanthe expenses listed in § 55.530:

FeeS o lid s----------- $7.70F a t____ — — ____i---------16.40Bacteriological plate count--------------- 7.70Bacteriological direct count-— -------- 15. 40Coliforms -------- 11.65E. Coli (Presumptive)----------------------- 11.55Yeast and mold count---------- ——— 7.70Sugar ------------- 19.25Salt — ______________ - .............— - 19-25Color:

NEPA — -------------------------------- - ,11- 55B-Carotene--------- ----------------- 15.40

Whipping test------------------— ----------- 7.70Whipping test plus bleeding— --------11. 55Fat film test---------------------------------- 19.25Oxygen -------------------------------------- W- 55Glucose:

Quantitative — ---------------------- 15.40Qualitative ------------- 11.55

Palatability and odor:First sample--------------------------- 7.70Each additional sample—---------- 3.85

Staphylococcus --------------------------- 23.10Salmonella: 1

Step 1_____________________ - - 15. 40Step 2__--------------------------------- 7.70Step 3__________ ___ _____ ___ 15.40

1 Salmonella test may be in three steps as follows: Step 1—growth through differential agars; step 2—growth and testing through triple-sugar-iron and lysine iron agars; step 3—confirmatory test through biochemicals.. (b) The fee charge for any laboratory analysis not listed in paragraph (a) of this section, or for any other applicable services rendered in the laboratory shall be based on the time required to perform such analysis or render such service. The hourly rate shall be $15.40.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207—-FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975


5. In § 55.560, paragraph (a) (5) is amended to read :§ 55.560 Charges for continuous inspec

tion and grading service on a resident basis.* * * * 4

(a) * * ** * * * *

(5) An administrative service charge equal to 25 percent of the grader’s or inspector’s total salary costs. A minimum charge of $80 will be made each billing period.

* * * * *PART 56— GRADING OF SHELL EGGS

AND U.S. STANDARDS, GRADES, AND WEIGHT CLASSES FOR SHELL EGGS6. In § 56.46, paragraphs (b) and (c)

are amended to read:§ 56.46 On a fee basis.

* * * * *<b) Fees for grading services will be

based on the time required to perform the services. The hourly charge shall be $14 and shall include the time actually required to perform the grading, waiting time, travel time, and any clerical costs involved in issuing a certificate.

Ic) Grading services rendered on Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays shall be charged for a t the rate of $18.48 per hour. Information on legal holidays is available from the Supervisor.

7. In § 56.52, paragraph (a)(8) is amended to read:§ 56.52 Continuous grading performed

on a resident basis.$ * * * *

(a) * * *(8) An administrative service charge

based upon the aggregate number of 30- dozen cases of all shell eggs handled in the plant per billing period multiplied by $.014, except that the minimum charge per billing period shall be $80 * and the maximum charge shall be $625.

PART 70— GRADING AND INSPECTION OF POULTRY AND EDIBLE POULTRY PRODUCTS THEREOF; AND U.S. CLASSES, STANDARDS, AND GRADES WITH RESPECT THERETO8. In § 70.131, paragraphs (to) and (c)

are amended to read:§70.131 On a fee basis.

• * * ■ * *(b) Fees for grading services will be

based on the time required to perform such services for class, quality, quantity (weight test), or condition, whether live, dressed, or ready-to-cook poultry is involved. The hourly charge shall be $14 and shall include the time actually required to perform the work, waiting time, travel time, and any clerical costs involved in issuing; a certificate.

1Also applies where an approved application is in effect and no product is handled.

(c) Grading services rendered onSaturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays shall be charged for at the rate of $18.48 per hour. Information on legal holidays is available from the Supervisor.

* * * * *9. In § 70.138, paragraph (a) (8) is

amended to read:§ 70.138 Continuous grading performed

on a resident basis.* * * ♦ *

(a) * * *(8) An administrative service charge

based upon the aggregate weight of the total volume of all live and ready-to- cook poultry handled In the plant per billing period computed in accordance with the following:

Total pounds per billing period multiplied by $.00014, except that the minimum charge per billing period shall be $801 and the maximum charge shall be $625.

* * * * *Legislation requires that the fees and

charges for grading and inspection services under the Agricultural. Marketing Act of 1946, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.) shall be reasonable and shall, as nearly as possible, cover the cost of such service.

The facts upon which the determinations are based as to the level of fees and charges necessary to cover these costs are not available to the industry, but are peculiarly within the knowledge of the Department. Therefore, public rulemaking would not result in the Department receiving additional information on this matter.

Accordingly, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is found upon good cause that notice and other public procedure with respect to the amendments are impracticable and unnecessary, and good cause is found for making the amendments effective less than 30 days after publication in the F ederal R egister since increased revenues are urgently needed to provide services.

Issued at Washington, D.C. this 20th .day of October to become effective November 9,1975.

D onald E. W ilkinson, Administrator.

fFR Doc.75-28660 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

CHAPTER . Ill— ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT ^OF AGRICULTURE

PART 331— PLANT PEST REGULATIONS GOVERNING INTERSTATE MOVEMENT OF CERTAIN PRODUCTS AND ARTICLES

Subpart— Mediterranean Fruit Fly • Purpose. The purpose of this docu

ment is to establish emergency regulations to prevent the spread of the Mediterranean fruit fly. •

The purpose of this document is to give notice of existence of a hazardous

1 Also applies where an approved application is in effect and no product is handled.

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER

situation because of the discovery of the Mediterranean fruit fly in Los Angeles County, California, and to establish emergency regulations under the Federal Plant Pest Act (7 U.S.C. 150aa-150jj) in order to control the movement of certain products and articles which present a risk of spreading the infestation to other fruit and vegetable growing areas of the United States.

Statement of considerations. The Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata Wied., is one of the world’s most destructive pests of fruits and vegetables, especially citrus. It is a native of the Mediterranean area and is known to attack over 200 kinds of fruits and vegetables and can cause serious economic losses. Heavy infestation can cause complete loss of crops, and losses of 25 to 50 percent are not uncommon. Its short life cycle permits the iapid development of serious outbreaks.

The last infestation was discovered in Brownsville, Texas, in June 1960" and because of prompt emergency measures the fly was declared eradicated in November 25, 1966 (31 FR 14925). Constant vigilance' against réintroduction of the fly and prompt eradication efforts are the most effective means of dealing with this pest.

The present infestation in Los Angeles, California, was discovered in September 1975.

The Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs of the Animal and Plant Héalth Inspection Service has begun an intensive Mediterranean fruit fly eradication program. In order to prevent the possibility of artificially spreading the fly with host and other material, it is necessary to impose restrictions on the movement of such materials from the regulated area into noninfested areas.

Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Plant Pest Act (7 U.S.C. 150aa-=150jj), Chapter HI, Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, is hereby amended by adding to Part 331 à new § 333.1 and a subpart heading preceding said section as follows :

Subpart— Mediterranean Fruit Fly§ 331.1 • Notice of existence of emer

gency and regulations related thereto.(a) Infestations of the Mediterranean

fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wied.), a dangerous plant pest not widely prevalent or distributed within and throughout the United States, have been found in a portion of Los Angeles County, California, and it has been determined that it is necessary to adopt, as an emergency measure, a rule imposing restrictions, as provided for in this section, upon the interstate movement of certain products and articles, from the regulated portion of said county as hereinafter described, in order to prevent the interstate dissemination of said plant pest. Accordingly, the products and articles listed in paragraph (b) of this section shall not be moved interstate from that portion of Los Angeles County, California, bounded by a line beginning a t a point of intersection of the Pacific Ocean and

24, 1975

RULES AND REGULATIONS 49785an imaginary line extending due south from the point where Topanga Canyon Road intersects California State Route 1; thence extending northerly along said imaginary line to said point; thence northerly along Topanga Canyon Road to its intersection with Mulholland Drive;, thence easterly along said drive to its intersection with Interstate 405; thence southerly along said interstate to its intersection with Interstate 10; thence easterly along Interstate 10 to its intersection with La Cienega Boulevard; thence southerly along said boulevard to its intersection with Manchester Boulevard (State Highway 42); thence westerly along Manchester Boulevard and Manchester Avenue to the intersection of Manchester Avenue and Vista Del Mar; thence westerly along an imaginary line extending due west from such intersection to a point where said imaginary line intersects the Pacific Ocean; thence northwesterly along the California coastline from said point to the point of beginning; unless:

(1) Such products and articles have been treated to destroy Mediterranean fruit fly infestations in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Deputy Administrator, Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,1 under the direction of an inspector authorized by the Deputy Administrator, and the products and articles are accompanied by a certificate issued by such an inspector signifying that they are eligible for interstate movement; or

(2) Such products and articles originate in an area in the said regulated portion of Los Angeles County, which has been inspected by such an inspector, and he has found that the interstate movement of the products and articles from such area will not involve a risk of disseminating said infestations, and the products and articles are accompanied by a certificate issued by such an inspector signifying that they are eligible for interstate movement; or,

(3) Such products and articles are moved under permit issued by such an inspector to an approved destination for consumption, processing, or other handling in accordance with procedures prescribed by said inspector, when upon evaluation of the circumstances involved in each specific case he determines that such movement will not result in the spread of the Mediterranean fruit fly and requirements of other applicable Federal domestic plant quarantines have been met

(b) The following products and articles are subject to the emergency measures imposed under this section: '

(1) Apples, apricots, avocados, cantaloupes, cherries (sweet and sour), citrus,

‘ Instructions are available upon request «om the Deputy Administrator, Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs, Animal

Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. °f Agriculture, HyattsvUle, MD

«« res, or from an inspector.

cucumbers, dates, eggplants, figs, grapes, olives, peaches, pears, peppers, plums, primes, pumpkins, tejocotes, tomatoes (pink and red ripe), and watermelons, provided, however, that said products are not subject to this regulation if quick frozen or canned;

(2) Any other products, articles, or means of. conveyance of any character whatsoever, not covered by subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, when it is determined by an inspector that they present a hazard of spread of the Mediterranean fruit fly and the person in possession thereof has been so notified.(Sec. 105, 71 Stat. 32, sec. 106, 71 Stat. 33, sec. 107, 71 Stat. 34 (7 U.S.C. 150aa-150Jj); 37 FR 28464, 28477, as amended; 38 FR 19141.)

Under this regulation, specific products and articles may be moved interstate from the described portion of Los Angeles County, California, only if they have been treated or originate in certain areas of said county, or aré moved under permit issued by an authorized inspector to an approved destination for consumption, processing, or other approved handling. Such measures are necessary because an emergency exists as a result of recently discovered infestations of the Mediterranean fruit fly, a dangerous plant pest which is not widely prevalent in the United States.

Inasmuch as such infestation must be controlled immediately to prevent the spread of the Mediterranean fruit fly, it is found upon good cause under the administrative procedure provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, that notice and other public

procedure regarding tills regulation are impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest, and good cause is found for making said regulation effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

The foregoing regulation shall become effective on October 24, 1975.(It is hereby certified that the economlo and inflationary impacts of this proposed regulation have been carefully evaluated in accordance with OMB Circular A-107.)

Done at Washington, D.C., this 22d day of October 1975.

Thomas G. Darling, Acting Deputy Administrator,

Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs.

[FR Doc.75-28864 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

CHAPTER IX— AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (MARKETING AGREEMENTS AND ORDERS; FRUITS, VEGETABLES, NUTS), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

[Orange Reg. 74, Arndt. 1; Grapefruit Reg. 76, Arndt. 1; Tangerine Reg. 47, Arndt. 1; Tangelo Reg. 47, Arndt. 1 ]PART 905— ORANGES, GRAPEFRUIT, TAN

GERINES, AND TANGELOS GROWN IN FLORIDA

Amendment of Grade and Size Regulations These amendments extend through

September 26, 1976, current grade and size requirements applicable to domestic and export shipments of Florida oranges, grapefruit, tangerines and tangelos as set forth in the following table:

T able

VarietyDomestic regulations Export regulations

Minimum diameterMinimum grade in inches (count size Minimum grade

in % bu carton)Minimum diameter in inches (count size

in H bu carton)

E arly midseason U .9. No. l_ . ..........oranges.

Navel oranges------ U .8. No. 1, GoldenTemple oranges___U.S. No. 1.M urcott honey Florida, No. 1____ ..

oranges.Valencia oranges... U .8. No. 1 ..Seeded grapefruit._____do____• ..........Seedless grapefruit- Improved No. 2___Tangerines............... U.S. No. 1 .......... . . .T angelos.......... ........... .d o . . ...............

29*6 (size 125).......... . U.S. No. 1..................... 2M« (size 163).

. . . . . do .--------------------- U.S. No. 1, Golden__ Do.-----do .............................U .8. No. 1. .......... Do.2‘H« (size 1 2 0 )...------Florida, No. 1________ 2ftf« (size 150).

29*6 (size 125)................U.S. No. 1............3‘M6 (size 4 0 ) . . . . . ____. . . . d o . . . . . . ____3Ms (size 4 8 ) . . . . . ------ Improved No. 2.2H« (size210)..__. . . . U.S. No. 1.........2 H e (size 1 2 5 ) ... .................. do............. .

2Mb (size 163). S fi» (size 48). 3<H# (size 64). 2t4e (size 246). 2fie (size 163).

Such shipments of Florida oranges, grapefruit, tangerines and tángelos are currently regulated through October 26, 1975, pursuant to Orange Regulation 74, Grapefruit Regulation 76, Tangerine Regulation 47 and Tangelo Regulation 47. The extension of the effective period of such regulations is necessary to promote orderly marketing and provide consumers with an ample supply of acceptable-quality fruit.

Notice was published in the Federal Register on September 26, 1975 (40 FR 44333), that consideration was being given to amendment of the regulations applicable to shipments of Florida oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and tángelos handled between the production area and any point outside thereof. The

notice provided that all written data, views, or arguments in connection with the proposed amendments be submitted by October 10,1975. None were received. The regulations were recommended by the Growers Administrative Committee, established under thé marketing agreement, as amended, and Order No. 905, as amended (7 CFR Part 905), regulating the handling of oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and tangélos grown in Florida. This program is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674).

The amendments reflect the Department’s appraisal of the need for regulation of shipments of the specified varieties of oranges, grapefruit, tangerines, and tangelos during the period October


49786 RULES AND REGULATIONS27, 1975, through September 26, 1976, based on the available supply and current and prospective market conditions. The amendments are necessary to ensure the continued shipment of fruit of appropriate grades and sizes in the interest of both growers and consumers. The action is necessary to maintain orderly marketing conditions by preventing the adverse effect on the market caused by shipment of lower-quality and smaller-size fruit when more than ample supplies of the more desirable grades and sizes are available to serve consumers’ needs. The amendments are consistent with the objectives of the act of promoting orderly marketing and protecting the interest of consumers.

After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including the proposals set forth in the aforesaid notice and other available information, it is hereby found that the amended regulations, as hereinafter set forth, are in accordance with said amended marketing agreement and order and will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.

It is hereby further found that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date of these amendments until 30 days after publication in the F ederal R egister (5 U.S.C. 553) in that (1) notice of proposed rulemaking concerning these amendments, with an effective date of October 27, 1975, was. published in the Federal Register on September 26,1975 (40 FR 44333), and no objection to these amendments or such effective date was received; (2) the recommendation and supporting information for regulation of the aforesaid fruits during the period specified herein were submitted to the Department after an open meeting of the Growers Administrative Committee on September 4, 1975, which was held to consider recommendations for regulation, after giving due notice of such meeting, and interested persons were afforded an opportunity to submit their views at this meeting; and (3) compliance with the amendments will not require any special preparation on the part of the persons subject thereto which cannot be completed by the effective time hereof.

Order. 1. In § 905.560 (Orange Regulation 74; 40 FR 42318) the introductory portions of paragraphs (a) and (b) are revised to read as follows:§ 905.560 Orange Regulation 74.

(a) During the period October 27, 1975, through September 26, 1976, -no handler shall ship between the production area and any point outside thereof in the continental United States, Canada, or Mexico:

* * *

(b) During the period October 27,1975, through September 26, 1976, no handler shall ship to any destination outside the continental United States other than to Canada or Mexico:

• • * * *

2. In § 905.563 (Grapefruit Regulation 76; 40 FR 42317) the introductory portions of paragraphs (a) and (b) are revised to read as follows:§ 905.563 Grapefruit Regulation 76.

(a) During the period October 27, 1975, through September 26, 1976, no handler shall ship between the production area and any point outside thereof in the continental United States, Canada, or Mexico:

* * * * *(b) During the period October 27,

1975, through September 26, 1976, no handler shall ship to any destination outside the continental United Sttaes other than to Canada or Mexico :

* * * * *3. In § 905.561 (Tangerine Regulation

47; 40 FR 42319) the introductory pro- tions of paragraphs (a) and (b) are revised to read as follows:§ 905.561 Tangerine Regulation 47.

(a) During the period October 27, 1975, through September 26, 1976, no handler shall ship between the production area and any point outside thereof in the continental United States, Canada, or Mexico:

• * * * *(b) During the period October 27,

1975, through September 26, 1976, no handler shall ship to any destination outside the continental United States other than to Canada or Mexico:

* * * * *4. In § 905.562 (Tangelo Regulation

47; 40 FR 42318) the introductory portions of paragraphs (a) and (b) are revised to read as follows:§ 905562 Tangelo Regulation 47.

(a) During the period October 27, 1975, through September 26, 1976, no handler shall ship between the production area and any point outside thereof in the continental United States, Canada, or Mexico: '

♦ * * * *(b) During the period October 27,

1975, through Sëptember 26, 1976, no handler shall ship to any destination outside the continental United States other than to Canada or Mexico:.. * * * * *(Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; (7 TJ.S.C. 601-674) )

Dated, October 21,1975, to become effective October 27,1975.

Charles R. Brader, Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg

etable Division, Agricultural Marketing Service.

[FR Doc.75-28724 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

PART 911— LIMES GROWN IN FLORIDA Rules and Regulations

This amendment adds a new section to the Rules and Regulations currently

in effect pursuant to Marketing Order No. 911. The new section requires each handler, who has delinquent assessments, which become due after November 3Q, 1975, to pay the Lime Administrative* Committee interest of one percent per month on any unpaid assessment balance beginning 30 days after date of billing.

Notice was published in the Federal R egister issue on October 2, 1975, (40 FR 45442), that the Department was giving consideration to a proposal to amend the rules and regulations (Subpart—Rules and Regulations; 7 CFR 911.110-911.131) under provisions of the marketing agreement, as amended, and Order No. 911, as amended (7 CFR Part 911) , regulating the handling of limes grown in Florida, effective under the applicable provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). No comments regarding the proposal were received.

The slow payment of some handlers has caused the program additional bookkeeping, clerical, and mailing expense. Delinquent handlers have received undue advantage over those handlers who have paid their assessments in a timely manner in that unpaid funds have been used as interest free short term capital.

After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including that in the aforesaid notice which was submitted by the Florida Lime Administrative Committee (established pursuant4o the said amended marketing agreement and order as the agency to administer the provisions thereof), it is hereby found that the amendment, as hereinafter set forth, of the rules and regulations (Subpart— Rules and Regulations), pursuant to said amended marketing agreement and order is in accordance with the provisions of said amended marketing agreement and order and will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act. Therefore, Subpart—Rules and Regulations of the said amended marketing agreement and order is hereby amended to add a new § 911.155 to read as follows:§ 911.155 Delinquent assessments.

Each handler shall pay interest of one percent per month on any unpaid assessment balance beginning 30 days after date of billing. Such interest charge is to apply to any unpaid assessments which become due the Florida Lime Administrative Committee after the effective date of this section.(Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; (7 U.S.C. 601-674))

Dated, October 21, 1975, to become effective November 30,1975.

Charles R. B rader, Deputy Director, Fruit and

Vegetable Division, Agricultural Marketing Service.

[FR Doc.75-28725 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]


RULES AND REGULATIONS 49787[Avocado Reg. 17, Arndt. 18]

PART 915— AVOCADOS GROWN IN SOUTH FLORIDA

Maturity RequirementsThis amendment revises the maturity

requirements for the Booth 7, Hickson, Lula, Booth 8, Chica, Collinson, Simpson, Vaca, Marcus, Booth 5, Booth 10 and Ajax varieties of Avocados. These varieties will mature one to three weeks sooner than they currently can be shipped at specified minimum-weights or diameters. Unseasonal growing conditions in the production area have caused avocados to mature earlier than in prior seasons. Weights or diameters and picking dates are indices used at harvest to assure that avocados are mature and will ripen satisfactorily after picking.

Findings. (1) Pursuant to the marketing agreement, as amended, and Order NO. 915, as amended (7 CFR Part 915), regulating the handling of avocados grown in South,Florida, effective under the applicable provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), and upon the basis of the recommendation of the Avocado Administrative Committee, established under the aforesaid marketing agreement and order, and upon other available information, it is hereby found that the maturity requirements for the handling of avocados, as hereinafter provided, will tend to affectuate the declared policy of the act.

(2) The need for the amendmentstems from the current avocado crop maturity situation. Maturity studies on the specified varieties completed recently indicate that avocados of such varieties will be mature at the hereinafter specified dates, minimum weights, or diameters. \

(3) It is hereby further found that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest to give preliminary notice, engage in public rulemaking procedure, and postpone the effective date of the amendment until 30 days after publication thereof in the Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) in that the time intervening between the date when information upon which this amendment is based became available and the time when this amendment must become effective in order to effectuate the declared policy of the act is insufficient; and this amendment relieves restrictions on the handling of specified varieties of avocados.

Order. (1) The provisions of paragraph (a)(2) of §915.317 (Avocado Regulation 17; 40 FR 24006;' 26501; 28048; 29068; 29812; 30793; 328231; 33963; 38145; 41993; 44305; 47102) are amended by revising in Table I the dates applicable to the Booth 7, Hickson, Lula, Booth 8, Chica, Collinson, Simpson, Vaca, Marcus, Booth 5, Booth 10 and Ajax varieties so that after such revision the portion of Table I relating to such varieties of avocados reads as follows:

Minimum Minimum MinimumVariety Date ■weight ór Date weight or Date weight or Date

diameter diameter diameter

d ) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

Booth 8 .. _________.................... 9-16-75 16 oz 10- 6-75 12 oz 10-20-75 9 oz 10-27-7

Booth 7....................... .39Í# in 391# in 3-91#

.................... 9-22-75 10- 6-75 14 oz 10-20-763*91# in 391« in

Hickson____________.................... 9-22-75 12 oz 10- 6-75 10 oz 10-20-753Me in 2*91« in

L ola.............................. .................... 10- 0-75 18 oz 10-20-75 14 oz 11-17-753*M# iu 391# in ■

Chica................................................. 9-19-75 12 oz 10-13-75 10 oz 10-20-753J1# in 3M« in

Collinson............... 0-20-75 10-20-753*94«in

S im p so n ............ ........ .................... 10- 6-75 16 oz 39i# in

1C-20-75

Vaca......................... . . . .................... 10- 6-75 16 oz 391# in

10-20-75

Marcus_____ _____ _ ........... ......... 9-22-75 40 oz 10- 6-75 32 oz 10-20-75 24 oz 11-17-7Booth 10 ..................... ................ 10-13-75 16 oz 10-2C-75 14 oz 11-10-75

3*916 in 6 inAjax.............................. ................ 10-20-75 16 oz

3*91« in11-17-75

Booth 5___^................. ......... ..........10- 6-75 16 oz 3‘M# *n

10-20-75

(Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601-674)Dated October 20,1975, to become effective October 20,1975.

Charles R. B rader,Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division,

' Agricultural Marketing Service.[FR Doc.75—28613 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Grapefruit Reg. 16; Arndt. 1]PART 944— FRUITS; IMPORT

REGULATIONSMinimum Grade and Size Requirements

for Imports of GrapefruitT his ' amendment extends through

September 26, 1976, current grade and size requirements applicable to imported grapefruit as follows: Imported seeded grapefruit—U.S. No. 1 and inches in diameter; imported seedless grapefruit-im proved No. 2 and 3%e inches in diameter. The requirements aré the same as those applicable to grapefruit produced in Florida arid regulated pursuant to Marketing Order No. 905.

Notice was published in the Federal Register on September 26, 1975 (40 FR 44334), that consideration was being given to a proposed amendment which would regulate the importation of grapefruit into th§ United States. The notice provided that all written data, views, or arguments in connection with the proposed amendment be submitted by October 10, 1975. None were received.

This amendment would be issued pursuant to section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). This section requires that whenever specified commodities, including grapefruit, are regulated under a Federal marketing order, the imports of that commodity must meet the same or comparable grade, size, quality, or maturity requirements as those in effect for the domestically produced commodity. This regulation is the same as the domestic grade and size regulation for grapefruit, issued pursuant to the marketing agreement, as amended, and Order No. 905, as amended (7 CFR Part 905), regulating the handling of oranges, grapefruit, tangerines and tángelos grown in Florida, which becomes effective October 27, 1975.

It is hereby found that good cause exists for not postponing the effective time of the regulatory provisions of this amendment, as hereinafter set forth, beyond that hereinafter specified (5 U.S.C. 553) in that (a) the requirements of this amended import regulation are imposed pursuant to section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), which makes such requirements mandatory;(b) the grade and size requirements of this amended import regulation are the same as those being made applicable to domestic shipments of grapefruit grown in Florida under amended Grapefruit Regulation 76 (§ 905.563); (c) notice that such action was being considered was published in the September 26,1975, issue of the Federal Register (40 FR 44334), and no objection to this regulation was-received; (d) the provisions of this import regulation are the same as those contained in said notice; (e) notice hereof in excess of three days, the minimum prescribed by said section 8e, is given with respect to this import regulation by prescribing an effective date of October 27, 1975, and (f) such notice is hereby determined, under the circumstances, to be reasonable.

After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including the proposal set forth in the aforesaid notice, and other available information, it is hereby found that the grade and size requirements in effect pursuant to the said amended marketing agreément and order shall apply to grapefruit to be imported.

Order. In § 944.112 (Grapefruit Regulation 16; 40 FR 42529) the introductory text of paragraph (a) and subparagraphs (1) and (2) thereof are revised to read as follows:



§ 944.112 Grapefruit Regulation 16.(a) During the period October 27,1975,

through September 26, 1976, the importation into the United States of any grapefruit is prohibited unless such grapefruit is inspected and meets the following requirements:

(1) Seeded grapefruit shall grade at least U.S.' No. 1 and be of a size not smaller than 31%6 inches in diameter, except that a tolerance for seeded grapefruit smaller than such minimum size shall be permitted, which tolerance shall be applied in accordance with the provisions for the application of tolerances, specified in § 51.761 of the United States Standards for Florida Grapefruit; and

(2) Seedless grapefruit shall grade at feast Improved No. 2 and be of a size not smaller than 3%e inches in diameter, except that a tolerance for seedless grapefruit smaller than such minimum size shall be permitted, which tolerance shall be applied in accordance with the provisions for the application of tolerances, specified in § 51.761 of the United States Standards for Florida Grapefruit. (“Improved No. 2” shall mean grapefruit grading at least U.S. No. 2 and also meeting the requirements of the U.S. No. 1 grade as to shape (form) and color.)

* * * * *(Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; (7 U.S.C. 601-674) ) f *

Dated, October 21, 1975, to become effective October 27, 1975.

Charles R. Brader, Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg

etable Division, Agricultural Marketing Service.

[FR Doc.75-28726 Filed 10-23-75*8:45 am]

CHAPTER XIV— COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

s u b c h a p t e r b — l o a n s , p u r c h a s e s , a n dOTHER OPERATIONS

[Cooperative Marketing Associations, Price Support-Eligibility Reg. Arndt. 3]

PART 1425— COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS

Subpart— Eligibility Requirements for Price ■ 0 Support

Miscellaneous Amendments rThe regulations issued by the Com

modity Credit Corporation and published a t 36 FR 13024 and 39 FR 14187 and 27313, which set forth specific eligibility requirements for cooperative marketing associations desiring to participate in authorized price support programs are amended to change the office designated as having responsibility for administering the provisions thereof :

The regulations are changed as follows:

1. The first sentence of paragraph (a) of § 1425.2 is amended to change the designated office responsible for administering the provisions of this subpart. The amended paragraph reads as follows :§ 1425.2 Administration.

(a) Responsibility. The Grains, Oilseeds and Cotton Division, ASCS, will

administer the provisions of this subpart under tide general direction and supervision of the Deputy Administrator, Programs, in accordance with program provisions and policy determined by Commodity Credit Corporation. In the field, the provisions of this subpart will be administered by the State and County Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Committees, and where applicable, the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Commodity Office. As used in this part, the term “CCC” means the Commodity Credit Corporation and the term “ASCS” means the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service.

* * * * *2. Paragraph (a) of § 1425.3 is

amended to change: (1) The office where a copy of the application form, related questionnaire and regulations may be obtained; (2) The office where inquiries relating to such documents should be addressed; and (3) The office to which a cooperative should forward its application and required information. Paragraph(c) is amended to change the office that will request information annually and paragraph (d) is amended to change the office to receive current changes. The amended paragraphs (a), (c) and (d) read as follows:§ 1425.3 Application. __

(a) Initial approval. A cooperative which desires approval to obtain price support shall submit an application for a determination of eligibility with respect to each of the commodities listed herein for which approval is sought. An application form and related questionnaire and a copy of the regulations appearing in this subpart may be obtained from the Grains, Oilseeds and Cotton Division, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250. Inquiries relating to such documents should also be addressed to the Grains, Oilseeds and Cotton Division. Hie cooperative shall forward its application and required information to the Director, Grains, Oilseeds and Cotton Division, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250. Applications with respect to each of the commodities listed herein and supporting material shall be submitted on or before the applicable date listed below of the calendar year in which the cooperative requests approval to participate in the price support program for commodities marketed thereafter, or by such later dates as the Executive Vice President, ÇÇC, may authorize to alleviate hardship.

C o m m o d i t y D a t eCotton _____________________ Aug. 1.Honey_____ _________ _______ July 1.R ic e ______ _—----------------- --- Aug. 1.Tung oil____ :________________ Do.If price support program regulations for a commodity not listed above require a cooperative to obtain approval under this subpart to be eligible for price support, the latest date for filing an application for approval with respect to such com

modity shall be specified in such program regulations. Information submitted in connection with an application relative to trade secrets or financial or commercial operations or dealing with the financial condition of an applicant cooperative shall be kept confidential by the officers and employees of CCC and the Department of Agriculture and shall not be released except to the extent CCC determines such action is necessary for the conduct of the price support program.

* * * ‘ * * .:(c) Annual information. Annually, àn

approved cooperative shall furnish, when requested by the Director, Grains, Oilseeds and Cotton Division:

(1) An audit report to include any accompanying notes, schedules or exhibits, certified by a certified public accountant as fairly representing the financial condition of the cooperative.

(2) A statement showing the total capital interest in the cooperative owned by active members, and the total capitel interest owned by inactive and nonmembers by each separate category.

(3) Hie names of any active members who own in excess of 10 percent of thè capital of the cooperative and the amount owned by each.

(4) The quantity of each commodity delivered to the cooperative for marketing and the portion thereof received from active members.

(5) The quantity of each commodity tendered to CCC few loan and the quantity redeemed.

(d) Current information. An approved cooperative shall furnish to the Director, Grains, Oilseeds and Cotton Division, immediately:

(1) Any changes in its articles of incorporation, bylaws, resolutions, or marketing agreement.

(2) Any changes in officers, directors, or principal employees and conflict of interest statements in accordance with § 1425.8(d).

(3) Any change in pooling operations with an explanation of the change and why such change was necessary.

(4) Additional information as may be requested at any time in connection with its continued approval under this subpart.

* * * * * •Since these are administrative

changes and will have no effect on program operations, compliance with the notice of proposed rulemaking procedure would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Therefore, this amendment is issued without compliance with such procedure.(Secs. 4 and 5, 62 Stat. 1070, as amended (15 U.S.C. 714 b and c) )

Effective date: October 24, 1975.Signed at Washington, D.C., on: Oc

tober 17, 1975.Kenneth E. Frick,

Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation.

[FR Doc.75-28732 FUed 10-23-75;8:45 am]


49789

proposed rutesThis section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of

these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior.to the adoption of the final rules.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICELaw Enforcement Assistance

Administration[ 28 CFR Part 20 j

CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORDSCollection, Storage, and Dissemination of

InformationThis proposed regulation amends the

regulations pertaining to the collection, storage and dissemination of criminal history record information.

These amendments are based upon a réévaluation of the dedication requirement by the Department of Justice and the persuasive comments of many State and local officials who have stated that dedication of the criminal justice information system would cause highly excessive increases in present, criminal justice system expenditures and that other appropriate methods are available to assure the security of criminal justice information.

The amendments also extend the date on which the State plan must be submitted. r '

Hearings on the proposed changes will be held November 17, and if necessary November 18, 1975, beginning a t 10 am . in the 3rd Floor Conference Room, 633 Indiana Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. Two other hearings are planned to be held November 21, 1975, in Atlanta, Georgia and December 4, 1975, in San Francisco, California. Interested persons who wish to testify should notify ThomasJ. Madden, General Counsel, La# Enforcement Assistance Administration, U.S. Department of Justice, 633 Indiana Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. 20531 no later than five days before each hearing.

Ttie selected commentary dealing with the proposed amendments are deleted; §20.21, the second sentence; § 20.21(f)(2) in its entirety.

Written views on the proposed regulations should be submitted to the LEAA Office of General Counsel no later than December 5,1975.

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration by sections 501 and 524 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended by the Crime Control Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93-83, 87 Stat. 197 (42. U.S.C. 3701 et seq.) (Aug. 6, 1973), this amendment to Chapter I of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed.

In § 20.21 the first sentence of the introductory text is deleted and the following two sentences are added and paragraph (f) is revised to read as follows:

§ 20.21 Preparation and submission of a Criminal History Record Information Plan.

A plan shall be submitted to LEAA by each State on or before March 16, 1976, to set forth all operational procedures, except those, contained in paragraph (f) of this section. A supplemental plan covering paragraph (f) of this section shall be submitted no later than 60 days after the amendment to paragraph (f) of this section becomes effective. * * *

* « * * •

(f) Security. Insure confidentiality and security of criminal history record information by providing that where- ever criminal history record information is collected, stored, or disseminated, each State shall ensure th a t:

(1) Where computerized data processing is employed, effective and technologically advanced software arid hardware designs are instituted to prevent unauthorized access to such information.

(2) Access to criminal history record information system facilities,' systems operating environments, data file contents whether while in use or when stored in a media library, and system documentation conforms with security standards established by State legislation or, in the absence of such legislation, by regulations approved or issued by the governor of the State.

(3) A criminal justice agency shall have authority to set and enforce policy concerning those computer operations which support criminal history record information processing, by specifically providing that;

(i) Criminal history record information be stored by the computer in such manner that it cannot be modified, destroyed, accessed, changed, purged, or overlaid in any fashion by non-criminal justice terminals.

(ii) A designated criminal justice agency employee will specify and certify for operational use programs that will prohibit inquiry, record updates, or destruction of records from any terminal other than criminal justice system terminals which are so designated.

(iff) The destruction of records is limited to specifically designated terminals under the direct control of the criminal justice agency responsible for creating or storing the criminal history record information.

(iv) Designated criminal justice agency employees will specify and certify for operational use such programs to detect and store for their output all unauthorized attempts to penetrate. any criminal history record information system, program, or file.

(v) Such program(s) shall be known only to criminal justice agency employees responsible for criminal history record information system control or individuals and agencies pursuant to a specific agreement with the criminal justice agency to provide such programs and the program (s) kept continuously under maximum security conditions.

(4) A criminal justice agency will:(i) Select and supervise all personnel

authorized to have direct access to such information.

(ii) Assure that an individual or agency authorized direct access is responsible for (A) the physical security of criminal history record information under its control or in its custody and (B) the protection of such information from unauthorized access, disclosure, or dissemination.

(iii) Institute procedures to reasonably protect any central repository of criminal history record information from unauthorized access, theft, sabotage, fire, flood, wind, or other natural or manmade disasters.

(iv) Provide that each employee working with or having access to criminal history record information is familiar with the substance and intent of these regulations; and

(v) Provide that direct access to criminal history records information shall be available only to authorized officers or employees of a criminal justice agency and, as necessary, other authorized personnel essential to the proper operation of the criminal history record information system.

* * * * #2. Section 20.23 is revised to read as

follows:§20.23 Documentation: Approval by

LEAA.Within 90 days of that receipt of the

plan, LEAA shall approve or disapprove the adequacy of the provisions of the plan and certification. Evaluation of the plan by LEAA will be based upon whether the procedures set forth will accomplish the required objectives. The evaluation of the certification(s) will be based upon whether a good faith effort has been shown to initiate and/or further Compliance with the plan and regulations. All procedures in the approved plan must be fully operational and implemented by December 31, 1977. Certification shall be submitted in December of each year to LEAA until such complete compliance. The yearly certification shall update the information provided under § 20.21.

R ichard W. Velde, Administrator.

October 15,1975.[FR Doc.75-28752 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 am]


49790 PROPOSED RULES

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service

[ 7 CFR Part 909 ]GRAPEFRUIT GROWN IN ARIZONA AND

DESIGNATED PART OF CALIFORNIAProposed Rulemaking

This notice provides interested persons an opportunity to comment upon a proposal submitted by the Grapefruit Administrative Committee. The proposal is that the Department issue a regulation which during the period December 1, 1975, through August 31, 1976, would set a minimum grade of U S. No. 2 and a minimum diameter of 3%c inches for the handling of grapefruit grown in Cali-

' fornia and Arizona, except that initial handlers may handle grapefruit smaller than 3%6 inches in diameter directly to destinations in states other than California, Arizona, Florida, and Texas, providing that grapefruit so handled to destinations in Washington, Oregon, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Nevada, and Utah shall measure not smaller than 3$ie inches in diameter. There would be no m inimum size requirement for grapefruit handled to destinations in all other states and to export markets.

Consideration is being given to the following proposal submitted by the Administrative Committee, established pursuant to the Marketing Order No. 909, as amended (7 CFR Part 909), regulating the handling of fresh grapefruit grown in Arizona and designated part of California. This program is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601- 674).

All persons who desire to submit written data, views, or arguments in connection with the proposal should file the same in quadruplicate with the Hearing Clerk, Room 112A, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250, not later than November 7, 1975. All written submissions made pursuant to this notice will be made available for public inspection a t the office of the Hearing Clerk during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)).

The Administrative Committee on October 2, 1975, held a meeting to consider the need for regulation during the current season. The recommendations of the committee reflect its appraisal of the crop and current and prospective market conditions. Grapefruit is reported to be of good quality this year, and sizes are reported to be larger than last year. The committee believes that the establishment of the regulation hereinafter specified is necessary to achieve the objectives of the act in the interests of producers and consumers.

The proposed § 909.341 reads as follows:§ 909.341 Grapefruit Regulation 41.

(a) Order. (1) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a) (2) of this section, during the period December 1,1975, through August 31,1976, no handler shall handle from the State of California or

the State of Arizona to any point outside thereof except Mexico:

(1) Any grapefruit which do not meet the requirements for the U.S. No. 2 grade which for purpose of this section shall include the requirement that the grapefruit be fairly well colored, instead of slightly colored, and including as a part of the fairly well formed requirement, the requirement that the fruit be free from peel that is more than 1 inch in thickness a t the stem end (measured from the flesh to the highest point of the peel): Provided, That in lieu of the tolerance provided for the U.S. No. 2 grade, the following tolerances, by count, shall be allowed for the defects listed:

(a) 10 percent for fruit which is not at least fairly well colored;

(b) 10 percent for defects other than color, but not more than one-twentieth of this amount, or one-half of 1 percent shall be allowed for decay and not more than one-half, of 5 percent, shall be allowed for any single defect caused by broken skins, sunburn, scars, or peel that is more than 1 inch in thickness at the stem end; or

(ii)vAny grapefruit which measure less than 3%e inches in diameter: Pro- vided, That such diameter requirement shall not apply to individual packages containing 10 pounds or less in a lot and individual packages containing more than 10 pounds in a lot may contain not to exceed 10 percent of grapefruit of a size smaller than 3%« inches in diameter, if the lot as a whole does not contain mor6 than 5 percent of such size: Provided, further, That in determining the percentage of grapefruit in any lot which are smaller than 3%e inches in diameter, such percentage shall be based only on the grapefruit in such lot which are of a size 3*%e inches in diameter and smaller.

(2) Fubject to the requirements .of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, any handler may, but only as the initial handler thereof, handle grapefruit smaller than 3%6 inches in diameter directly to a destination in Zones 4, 5, or 6 and if the grapefruit is so handled to Zone 4, the grapefruit does not measure less than 3%e inches in diameter: Provided, That such diameter requirement shall not apply to individual packages containing 10 pounds or less in a lot and individual packages containing more than 10 pounds in a lot may contain not to exceed 10 percent of grapefruit of a size smaller than 3%c inches in diameter, if the lot as a whole does not contain more than 5 percent of such size: Provided, further, That in determining the percentage of grapefruit in any lot which are smaller than 3^6 inches in diameter, such percentage shall be based only on the grapefruit in such lot which are of a size 3*^6 inches in diameter and smaller.

(b) As used herein, “handler”, “grapefruit”, “handle”, “Zone 4”, “Zone 5”, and “Zone 6” shall have the same meaning as when used in said amended marketing order; the terms “U.S. No. 2”, “fairly well colored”, “slightly colored”, and “fairly well formed” shall have the same meaning as when used in the revised United

States Standards for .Grapefruit (California and Arizona), 7 CFR 51.925- 5Ì.955; and “diameter” shall mean the greatest dimension measured a t right angles to a line from the stem to the blossom end of the fruit.

Dated: October 21,1975.Charles R. B rader,

Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Agricultural Marketing Service.

(FR Doc.75-28727 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

[ 7 CFR Part 910 ]HANDLING OF LEMONS GROWN IN ARI

ZONA AND DESIGNATED PART OF CALIFORNIA

Proposed Amendment of Rules and Regulations

This notice invites written comment, not later than November 17, 1975, relative to the proposed reapportionment of the grower member representation on the Lemon Administrative Committee under Marketing Order No. 910.

Notice is hereby given that the Department is considering a proposed amendment, as hereinafter set forth, to the rules and regulations (Subnart—Rules and Regulations: 7 CFR 910.100-910.180; 36 FR 17486) currently in effect pursuant to the applicable provisions of the marketing agreement, as amended, and Order No. 910, as amended (7 CFR Part 910), regulating the handling of Lemons grown In Arizona and designated part of California, hereinafter referred to collectively as the “order.” This is a regulatory program effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). The amendment to said rules and regulations was unanimously recommended by the Lemon Administrative Committee, established under the order as the agency to administer the terms and provisions thereof.

The proposal involves realignment of grower representation on said committee as a result of changes in the affiliation (with handlers) of certain groups of growers. Under the order, grower membership on the committee is divided among three grower groups: The “co-op which markets more than 60 percent of the lemons” (The principal cooperative marketing organization); “other coops;” and “independents” who are growers not affiliated with any cooperative marketing organization. Recently, a group of growers who operate a packinghouse changed their group affiliation from the “co-op which markets more than 60 percent of the lemons” to “other co-ops”. As such change in affiliation does not reduce the volume of the principal cooperative marketing organization below the more than 60 percent level the grower representation assigned to that group would not be changed. However, the change increases the volume of the “other co-ops” from 4.15 percent to 6.27 percent based on volume of regulated shipments in the


PROPOSED RULES 49791

fiscal year ended July 31, 1975. The volume of such shipments hy the “ independents” group was 9.01 percent. On the basis of estimated production for the 1975-76 fiscal year, the volume controlled by the “other co-ops” and “independents” is approximately 10 and 11 percent, respectively. Hence, the volume controlled by these two groups is more nearly equal than when the current apportionment was made, and the proposed action would equalize grower representation between them by reducing the “independents” grower representation from three members to two and increasing the “other co-ops” grower representation from one to two. Total grower membership oh the committee would remain unchanged a t eight members.

The proposal is as follows:Amend § 910.120 Change in grower

representation to read as follows:§ 910.120 Change in grower represen

tation.Pursuant to § 910.22(h) grower repre

sentation on the Lemon Administrative Committee for-purposes of §§ 910.20 and 910.22 shall be as follows:

Co-op m ore' Other Inde-than 60 pet co-ops pendents

D is tr ic tl 1 0 0District 2____ . - 2 1 1D is tr ic ts .— . 1 1 1

All persons who desire to submit written data, views, or arguments for consideration in connection with the proposed committee realignment, shall file the same, in quadruplicate, with the Hearing Clerk, United States Department of Agriculture, Room 112, Administration Building, Washington, D.C.-- 20250, not later than November 17, 1975. All written submissions made pursuant to this notice will be made available for public inspection at the office of the Hearing Clerk during regular business hours (7 CPR 1.27(b)).

Dated: October 21, 1975.CHARLESl R. B rader,


[PR Doc.75-28728 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

f 7 CFR Part 932 ]OLIVES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA

Proposed Expenses, Rate of Assessment, and Carryover of Unexpended Funds

This notice invites written comments relative to the proposed Olive Administrative Committee expenses of $870,450 and an assessment rate of $15.00 per ton of regulated California olives to support committee activities during the 1975-76 fiscal year under marketing Order No. 932. The committee has also proposed that unexpended assessment income from 1974-75 and prior years be carried over as a reserve.

Consideration is being given to the following proposals submitted by the Olive

Administrative Committee, established pursuant to the marketing agreement, as amended, and Order No. 932, as amended (7 CFR Part 932), as the agency to administer the terms and provisions thereof. Said agreement and order regulate the handling of olives grown in California and are effective under the applicable provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674).

The proposals are as follows:(a) That expenses which are reason

able and likely to be incurred by the Olive Administrative Committee during the period September 1, 1975, through August 31,1976, will amount to $870,450.- (b) That the rate of- assessment for said period, payable by each first handler in accordance with § 932.39, be fixed at $15.00 per ton of olives.

(c) That unexpended assessment funds in excess of expenses incurred during the fiscal year ended August 31, 1975, and prior years be carried over as a reserve in accordance with the applicable provisions of § 932.40.

Terms used in the amended marketing, agreement and order shall, when used herein, have the same meaning as is given to the respective term in said amended marketing agreement and order.

All persons who desire to submit written data, views, or arguments in connection with the aforesaid proposal shall file the same, in quadruplicate, with the Hearing Clerk, United States Department of Agriculture, Room 112A, Washington, D.C. 20250, not later than November 15, 1975. All written submissions made pursuant to this notice will be made available for public inspection a t the office of the Hearing Clerk during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b) ).

Dated: October 20,1975.Charles R. B rader,


[PR Doc.75-28661 Piled 10-23-75:8:45 am]

[ 7 CFR Part 971 ]LETTUCE GROWN IN LOWER RIO GRANDE

VALLEY IN SOUTH TEXASProposed Expenses and Rate of

AssessmentConsideration is being given to au

thorizing the South Texas Lettuce Committee to spend not more than $20,200 for its operations during the fiscal period ending July 31, 1976, and to collect one cent ($0.01) per carton of lettuce handled by first handlers under the program.

The committee is the administrative agency established under Marketing Agreement No. 144 and Order No. 971 regulating the handling of lettuce grown in the Lower Rio Grande Valley in South Texas. This program is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 etseq.).

All persons who desire to submit written data, views, or arguments in connection with these proposals may file the same, in duplicate, with the Hearing Clerk, Room 112-A, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250, not later than November 6, 1975. All written comments will-be available for public inspection a t the office of the Hearing Clerk during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b) ).

The proposed § 971.215 reads as follows:§ 971.215 Expenses and rate of assess

ment.(a) The reasonable expenses that are

likely to be incurred during the fiscal period ending July 31,1976, by the South Texas Lettuce Committee, for its maintenance and functioning, and for such purposes as the Secretary determines to be appropriate will amount to $20,200.

(b) The rate of assessment to be paid by each handler in accordance with this part, shall be one cent ($0.01) per carton of assessable lettuce handled by him as the first handler during the fiscal period.

(c) Unexpended income in excess of expenses for the fiscal period may be carried over as a reserve to the extent authorized in § 971.43(a) (2).

(d) Terms used in this section have the same meaning as when used in the marketing agreement and this part.

Dated: October 21, 1975.Charles R. B rader,

Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg- getable Division, Agricultural Marketing Service.

[FR Doc.75-28729 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

[ 7 CFR Part 989 ]RAISINS PRODUCED FROM GRAPES

GROWN IN CALIFORNIAProposed Expenses of the Raisin Adminis

trative Committee and Rate of Assessment for the 1975—76 Crop YearNotice is given of a proposal regarding

expenses of the Raisin Administrative Committee for the 1975-76 crop year and rate of assessment for that crop year, under §§ 989.79 and 989.80 of the marketing agreement, as amended, and Order No. 989, as amended (7 CFR Part 989), regulating the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in California. The amended marketing agreement and order are effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674).

The Raisin Administrative Committee has unanimously recommended for the crop year beginning September 1, 1975 (1975-76 crop year), a budget of expenses in the total amount of $152,513 and an assessment rate of 83 cents per ton of assessable raisins. Expenses in that amount and the assessment rate are specified in the proposal hereinafter set forth.

Consideration will be given to any written data, views, or arguments pertaining to the proposal which are re-


49792 PROPOSED RULESceived by the Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room 112, Administration Building, Washington, D.C. 20250, not later than November 12, 1975. All written submissions made pursuant to this notice should be in quadruplicate and will be made available for public inspection a t the office of the Hearing Clerk during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)).

The proposed § 989.326 reads as follows;§ 989.326 Expenses of the Raisin Ad-

- ministrative Committee and rate of assessment for the 1975—76 crop year.

(a) Expenses. Expenses (other than those specified in § 989.82) in the amount of $152,513 are reasonable and likely to be incurred by the Raisin Administrative Committee during the crop year beginning September 1, 1975, for the maintenance and functioning of the Committee and the Raisin Advisory Board and for such purposes as the Secretary may, in accordance with § 989.79, determine to be appropriate.

(b) Rate of assessment. The rate of assessment for that crop year which each handler is required, under § 989.80, to pay to the Raisin Administrative Committee as his pro rata share of the expenses is fixed at 83 cents per ton applicable to each of the following:

(1) Free tonnage raisins acquired by the handler during the crop year, exclusive of such quantity thereof as represents the assessable portions of other handlers' raisins under paragraph (b) (3) of this section;

(2) Reserve tonnage raisins released or sold to the handler for use as free tonnage, during that crop year; and

(3) Standard raisins (which he does' not acquire) recovered by the handler by the reconditioning of off-grade raisins but only to the extent of the aggregate quantity of the free tonnage portions of these standard raisins that are acquired by other handlers during the crop year.

Dated: October 21,1975.Charles R. Brader,


[PR Doc.75-28730 Piled 10-23-75:8:45 am]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

Office of the Secretary [41 CFR Part 3-14]

SPECIAL TYPES AND METHODS OF PROCUREMENT

Proposed Rule MakingNotice is hereby given in accordance

with the .administrative provisions in 5 U.S.C. 553 that pursuant to the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended, the Office of the Secretary is considering an amendment to 41 CFR, Chapter 3? by adding a new Subpart 3-4.10, Architect/Engineer Serv

ices, to Part 3-4, Special Types and Methods of Procurement. This proposed rule will implement Amendment Number 122 to the Federal Procurement Regulations, Also this notice supersedes the notice published in the Federal Register on November 14, 1972 (FR Vol. 37, No. 220, pages 24118-24120).

Any person who wishes to submit written data, views, or objections pertaining to the proposed amendment may do so by filing them in duplicate with the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Grants and Procurement Management, OASAM, Room 2038, HEW Switzer Building, 330 C Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20201, on or before November 24,1975.

This amendment prescribes policies and procedures relative to the procurement of architect/engineer services.(It is hereby certified that the economic and inflationary impacts of this proposed regulation have been carefully evaluated in accordance with OMB Circular A-107)

Dated: October 17, 1975.s Jo h n .Ottina,

Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management.

As proposed, Subpart 3-4.10, Architect/ Engineer Services will read as follows:Sec.3-4.10013-4.10023-4.10033-4.10043-4.1004-1

3-4.1004-2

3-4.1004-4

3-4.1004-5

3-4.10053-4.1005-13-41005-6

General policy.Definitions.Public announcements.Selection.Establishment of architect/en

gineer evaluation boards.Functions of the evaluation boards.

Action by agency head or his authorized representative.

Procedures for procurements estimated not to exceed $10,-000.

Negotiation procedures.General.

Record of negotiation.

§ 3—4.1001 General policy.Pursuant to Public Law 92-582 dated

October 27, 1972, which amended the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (40 U.S.C. 471, et seqi), it is the policy of the Federal Government to publicly announce all requirements for Architect/ Engineer (A/E) services, and to negotiate contracts for A/E services on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualification, for the type of professional services required and at fair and reasonable prices. The acquisition of such services in connection with a “public building” as that term is defined in section 13 of the Public Building Act of 1959 (40 U.S.C. 612), may be exercised only under the conditions prescribed in § 101- 17.402(c) of this title and subject to standards prescribed by the Administrator of General Services pursuant to § 101-17.502 of this title. The procurement of such service» in connection with special purpose space such as schools, hospitals, laboratories, and research centers is subject to the Requirements and conditions prescribed by section 302(c) (4) of the Federal Property and Ad

ministrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 252(c) (4)) and § 1-3.204 of this title.§ 3—4.1002 Definitions.

(a) “Fee” means tiie total amount payable to the A/E for the work and services to be performed.§ 3—4.1003 Public announcements.

(a) One of the first steps in beginning tiie A/E selection process is to assure the availability of funds so that the succeeding A/E selection steps will be accomplished in a proper manner and that the Government and interested A/E firms will not be expending resources on projects that are tentative or stand little chance of being approved. In the event a certification of available funding has not been received but is reasonably anticipated in the near future, and it is imperative that the Government’s requirement.be publicized without further delay, the notice(s) publicizing the requirement should contain wording to the

♦effect that the Department expects to '-receive the design funds in the near fu

ture and discussions will not be held with the proposed A/E firm until receipt of such funds.

(b) Program of requirements. The program of requirements or design criteria is normally prepared by the appropriate program element, and is the basis for the subsequent preparation of the statement of work. Whenever possible, the Office of Facilities Engineering and Property Management (OFEPM), including its Regional Offices (ROFEC), should provide assistance in the preparation of the. program of requirements. The program requirements as well as the A/E statement of work (scope of services) , see 3-4.50-3, and the Independent Government estimate, see 3-4.1005-3, should be prepared and completed prior to the public announcement of the proposed procurement to ensure that the announcement complies with the requirem ents of FPR 1-1.1003-3 and 1-1.1003-7.

(c) Preparation of A/E Statement of Work (Scope of Services). The statement of work shall be prepared by that office responsible for the evaluation and selection action. A statement of work should facilitate price negotiations, eliminate ambiguities, and assure that the design wil satisfy program needs. Each A/E statement of work should reflect the specific design requirements. Such items as/ scheduling, cost control, and value management including life cycle costs are important factors for consideration. Typical areas covered-hy an A/E statement of work are: Predesign; Concepts & Schematics; Design Development; Contract Document Development; Construction Supervision; and other pertinent requirements such as time and payment scheduling, and phased options.

(d) To insure the broadest publicity concerning the Government’s interest in obtaining A/E services, the head of the procuring activity shall have developed notices in accordance with § 1-1.1003- 7(b) (9) with respect to individual proj-



ects. The following should be included in notices which publicize procurement of A/E services.

Firms desiring to be considered for architect/engineer contracts in a given area must file the Standard Form 254 and Standard Form 255, when applicable, with either the Principal Operating Component or the ROFEC whichever may be appropriate, or with the Director, Office of the Architectural and Engineering Services, OFEPM, Office of the Secretary, DHEW, 330 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, D.C. 20201, depending on the geographical area of interest.§ 3—4.1004 Selection.§ 3-4.1004—1 Establishment of A/E

evaluation boards.(а) The following shall apply to the

establishment of A/E evaluation boards:(1) When the independent Govern

ment estimate of the total A/E proposed contract exceeds $10,000 or regardless of I the dollar amount involved whenever/ A/E services are to be procured under an open-end (requirements) contract, alii evaluation and selection actions shall b e ' performed by evaluation boards of the Office of Facilities Engineering and Property, Management (OFEPM) which includes ROFEC’s.

(2) When the independent Government estimate of the total A/E proposed contract is $10,000 or less and the project is not within the scope of an open-end contract, such action for the evaluation and selection may be performed by ROFEC boards with the concurrence of the Regional Engineer when such functions cannot be performed by the prin-\ cipaT operating component under p a ra - ' graph (a) (3) of this section. .*s

(3) When the independent Govern^ ment estimate of the total A/E proposed contract is $10,000 or less and not within the scope of an open-end contract, the evaluation and selection actions may be conducted by the principal operating component’s personnel who meet the qualifications as set forth herein and consistent with the requirements of Subpart 1-4.10.

(4) In the event of special circumstances involving a proposed A/E contract estimated to exceed $10,000, which would not fall within the scope of an open-end contract, and which a principal operating component (POC) believes would warrant its exercising evaluation and selection functions in lieu of OFE PM, the POC must submit its request and justification to the Director, OFEPM for approval.

(5) Each evaluation board shall consist of five licensed professional architects or engineers (with the Regional Engineer or his representative serving as chairman on a ROFEC board), one program or administrative representative, one nonvoting contracting officer, and one nonviting recording secretary. A minimum number of three licensed architects or engineers shall be present at all evaluation board meetings.

(б) The makeup of evaluation boards in the Office of the Director, OFEPM, is determined by the Director, OFEPM, so as to meet varying requirements. The Re

gional Engineers shall determine the makeup of the evaluation boards in the ROFEC’s. Each principal operating component shall determine the makeup of the evaluation boards, consistent with this Section.

(7) No member of an outside firm or organization shall participate as a member of an evaluation board without the prior written approval of the Director, OFEPM.§ 3 —4.1004—2 Functions of the evalua

tion hoards.Under the general authority of the

Secretary’s technical staff, the Depart-( mental A/E evaluation boards shall perform the following functions:

r^~Ta) Prepare the report for submission I to the Director, OFEPM, or his author

ized representative, whichever may be I appropriate under 3-4.1004-4, listing in

the order of preference not less than three firms with addresses considered to be the most highly qualified to perform the required services. The report shall

l comply with paragraph (a) of this sec- \ tion, and include the following:*-~=fl) Summary sheet and rating factors tabulating the individual member scores, ranking, and rating factors;

(2) SF-254’s and 255’s plus any essential brochures for each A/E firm to be interviewed: and

(3) Government estimate of total A/E fee.§ 3—4.1004—3 Evaluation criteria.

(a) Whenever possible, small business firms will be selected for projects for

i which they are considered, to be qualified \ and capable of handling.r§ 3—4.1004—4 Action by agency head or

his authorized representative.(a) The responsible official to whom

tiie authority has been delegated shall review the report of the A/E evaluation board, and in concert with appropriate technical and staff representatives, shall either concur or otherwise advise the Board of his decision in writing.

(1) The approval of the Director, OFEPM, or his designee is required, whenever:

(1) The Government’s estimate of the total proposed A/E contract exceeds $100,000;

(ii) If, after holding discussions with not less than three most highly qualified firms, the evaluation board determines there should be a change in the order of preference listing; or

(iii) Any modification to an existing contract would increase the total contract amount by more than 35 percent.

(2) The approval of the cognizant Regional Engineer is required whenever the Government’s estimate is less than $100,000, except for paragraph (a) (3) of this section. (In the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area, such approval should be requested of the Director, Office of Architectural and Engineering Services (OFEPM).)

(3) The approval of the head of a principal operating component or his designee shall be provided when:

(i) The Government’s estimate of the total proposed A/E contract is $10,000 or less and selection is made pursuant to 1-4.1004-5; or

(ii) Under the circumstances referenced in 3-4.1004-1 (a), (3), and (4), the principal operating component will perform the evaluation and selection functions in lieu of OFEPM.

(b) The approving official shall inform the board in writing of his decision which will sèrve as an authorization for the contracting officer to commence negotiations. If the approving official changes the order of preference listing, his decision and authorization shall be likewise addressedjto the Board. A copy of the board s recommendation and evaluation data shall be submitted by it with the authorization to the contracting officer.§ 3—4.1004—5 Procedure for procure

ments estimated not to exceed $10.000.

Either one of the procedures set- forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of § 1-4.004-5 of this chapter may be used instead of /■ the procedures prescribed ip §§§ 1-4.- 1004-2 (b) and (c) of this chapter,3-4.1004-2 (a), and 3-4.1004-4 for procurements estimated not to exceed $10,000. Upon receipt of the approving official’s decision the chairman of thè board shall furnish the contracting officer a copy of the report which will comply with § 1-4.004-5(a) of this chapter.§ 3—4.1005 Negotiation procedures.§ 3—4.1005—1 General.

(a) The negotiation and award of A/E contracts shall be performed by ROFEC’s who have .been delegated contracting officer authority whenever the applicable evaluation and selection actions are accomplished by their offices under § 3-4.- 1004-1 (a) (1) and (2). Negotiation and award of A/E contracts are performed for OFEPM in Washington, D.C., by the Supply Operations Branch, OA/OAM, unless the Director, OFEPM, provides written authorization for another POC to do so. When evaluation and selection actions are performed by a principal operating component consistent with the provisions of § 3-4.1004-1 (a) (3) and (4) the responsible contracting officer of the POC may likewise negotiate and award the related A/E engineer contracts. Qualified contracting officers shall use the services of technical, legal, audit-pricing, and other specialists in the component to the extent deemed appropriate (sée §§ 1-3.801-2 and 1-3.803-3).

.(b) Negotiations should be directed toward:

(1) Reaching mutual agreement on the provisions of the contract; and

(2) Arriving a t a fair and reasonable price. See § 1-3.807-2, Requirements for Cost and Price Analysis; and § 1-3.807-1, Overhead Rate Consideration. See 5 3- 3.50.301 (j) regarding the documentation requirements for cost breakdown and analysis.


49794

(c) The principles set forth relative to preparation for negotiation (see 3-4.- 1005) shall apply to the negotiation of modifications to contracts.

(d) Where the modification involves work not initially included in the contract the statutory limitation is applicable, consistent with the following provisions, to the revised total estimated construction costs. Where redesign is required and the contract is modified, the following methods shall be used in determining the amount of the basic fee to be paid the architect:

(1) The estimated construction cost of the redesigned features will be added to the original estimated construction cost;

(2) The contract cost for the original design will be added to the contract for redesign; and

(3) The total contract design cost obtained by paragraph (c) (2) of this section will be divided by the total construction cost obtained by paragraph (c) (1) of this section.§ 3—4.1005—6 Record of negotiation.

Promptly at the conclusion of each negotiation, a memorandum setting forth the principal elements of the negotiations shall be prepared by the contracting officer in accordance with the requirements of § 1-3.811, for use by the reviewing authorities and for inclusion in the contract file. The rpemorandum shall contain sufficient detail to reflect the significant consideration controlling the establishment of the price and other terms of the contract. Negotiation memorandums must be prepared in accordance with § 3-50.3 and meet the requirements of that subpart.

[PR Doc.75-28697 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration [ 14 CFR Part 71 ]

[Airspace Docket No. 75-WE-23]TRANSITION AREA

Proposed DesignationThe Federal Aviation Administration

is considering an amendment to Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations that would establish a new transition area for Page Airport, Page, Arizona.

A new instrument approach procedure has been developed for Page Airport, Page, Arizona. Consequently, it is necessary to provide controlled airspace protection for aircraft executing this new instrument approach procedure by designating a transition area at Page, Arizona.

Interested persons may participate in the proposed rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications should be submitted in triplicate to the Chief, Airspace and Procedures Branch, Federal Aviation Administration, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90261. All communications received on or before November 24, 1975, will be

PROPOSED RULESconsidered before action is taken on the proposed amendment. No public hearing is contemplated at this time, but a rrangements for informal conferences with Federal Aviation Administration officials may be made by contacting the Regional Air Traffic Division Chief. Any data, views, or arguments presented during such conferences must also be submitted in writing in accordance with this notice in order to become part of the record for consideration. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in the light of comments received.

A public docket will be available for examination by interested persons in the Office of the Regional Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90261.

In consideration of the foregoing, the FAA proposes the following airspace action.

In § 71.181 ($0 F.R. 441) the following transition area is added:

Page, Abizona

That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius of Page Airport (latitude 36“55'35" N., longitude 111“26'53” W.); within 2 miles each side of the Page VOR 340“ radial, extending from the 6 mile radius area to 11 miles NW of the VOR; that airspace extending upward from 1200 feet above the surface within 6 miles NE and 9 miles SW of the Page VOR 340“ radial extending from the VOR to 18 miles NW of the VOR; and within 6 miles E and 9 miles west of the Page VOR 175“ radial extending from the VOR to 11.5 miles S of the VOR.

This amendment is proposed under the authority of section 307(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, (49 U.S.C. 1348(a)), and of section 6(c) of the Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(0).

Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on October 16, 1975.

Lynn L. Hink ,Acting Director, Western Region.

[PR Doc.75-28654 Piled 10-23-75:8:45 am)

CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD[1 4 CFR Part 288 ]

[EDR-^88; Docket No. 28422]EXEMPTION OF AIR CARRIERS FOR

MILITARY TRANSPORTATIONLogair and Quicktrans Minimum RatesNotice is hereby given that the Civil

Aeronautics Board has under consideration amendments to Part 288 of its Economic Regulations (14 CFR Part 288) concerned with the minhnum rates for Logair and Quicktrans domestic cargo charters performed by air carriers for the Department of Defense (DQD) and contracted for by the Military Airlift Command (MAC). The purpose of the proposed amendments is explained in the attached Explanatory Statement, and the proposed amendments are set forth in the proposed rule. The amendments are proposed under authority of Sections 204, 403 and 416 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended; (72

Stat. 743, 758 and 771, as amended; 49 U.S.C, 1324,1373 and 1386).

Interested persons may participate in the proposed rulemaking through submission of twelve (12) copies of written data, views, or arguments pertaining thereto, addressed to the Docket Section, Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington, D.C. 20428. All relevant material in communications received on or before November 24,1975, and reply comments received on or before December 9,1975, will be considered by the Board before taking final action on the proposed rules. Copies of such communication will be available for examination by interested persons in the Docket Section of the Board, Room 714, Universal Building, 1825 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washington, D.C., upon receipt thereof.

A list of all persons filing comments will be prepared by the Docket Section and sent to the persons named thereon. Those persons filing reply comments should serve any person whose comment is dealt with in their responsive comment. Persons filing responsive comr ments are to include at the time of filing appropriate proof of service (Rule 8(e), 14 CFR 302.8(e)) .

Dated: October 20,1975.By the Civil Aeronautics Board.[seal] Edwin Z. H olland,

Secretary.Explanatory S tatement

In November 1973, Overseas National Airways, Inc. (ONA) and Saturn Airways, Inc. (Saturn) separately filed petitions for rulemaking requesting increases in the minimum rates set forth in Part 288 of the Board’s Economic Regulations (14 CFR Part 288) applicable to Logair and Quicktrans domestic cargo charters performed bv air carriers for the Department of Defense (DOD).‘ In addition to requesting a full-scale review of the minimum rates, the carriers’ petitions sought the establishment of interim rates, at a level higher than the then existing minimums, pending completion of the full-scale review and the establishment of revised final minimum rates. Answers in support of the petitions were filed by the DOD. Thereafter, by notice of proposed rulemaking, EDR-262, January 15,1974, the Board initiated the requested rate review and proposed interim rates to be effective prospectively pending its completion. By ER-853, May17,1974, the Board adopted interim rates effective January 15,1974.2

The Board has now completed its review of the minimum rates applicable to Logair and Quicktrans services, and is herein proposing revised minimum rates for these domestic cargo charters set

1 The petitions were assigned docket numbers 26132 and 26136, respectively.

2 The Board has from time-to-time revised these1 interim rates based upon an expedited review of the carriers’ reported operating results for the Logair/Quicktrans services. See ER-919, adopted June 30, 1975; ER-906, adopted April 25, 1975; and ER-888, adopted November 14, 1974.



forth in Section 288.7(b) of Part 288, to be effective prospectively from the date adopted.

As a part of the review, Capitol International Airways, Inc. (Capitol), ONA and Saturn submitted cost forecasts for fiscal year 1975 operations, and the DOD submitted rate recommendations supported by its analysis of the carriers’ costs.* Conferences were held on May 8, 1975, between the Board’s staff and carrier and DOD representatives to discuss the various forecasts, and afterward, comments arid additional data were submitted by the carriers and the DOD.

All materials submitted by the carriers and the DOD have been analyzed by the Board, and the carriers’ forecasts have been adjusted in accordance with established Board policies. The forecasts and proposed adjustments, together with explanatory notes setting forth the basis for each adjustment, are set forth in the attached appendices.3“ A discussion of major issues follows.

BASE PERIOD

The Board’s established MAC ratemaking policy has been to base forecasts of a future period’s operating results upon an analysis of reported results for the most recent 12-month period. In this way, the Board attempts to avoid use of data skewed as a result of seasonal changes in the level of a carrier’s operations. Saturn has suggested that rather than use cost data for the most recent 12 months as the base period to forecast results in this proceeding, the Board should use only data for the most recent quarter in order to reflect fully in the prospective rates the impact of recent inflation. The carrier contends th a t use of one quarter’s data, as opposed to 12- month results, would be appropriate here because there is little or no seasonality in MAC domestic operations which would require use of data for a longer period. We are not persuaded, however, to abandon our established approach in this area. While the extent of MAC domestic operations may not fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, the carrier overlooks the fact that the costs assigned to MAC services are derived from system results, which do reflect seasonality changes from one quaver to another, especially in the area of direct operating costs.4 As such, the use of data for a 12-month period is necessary to avoid any statistical aberration that might appear in data for a shorter period. Accordingly, we have used results for the year ended March 31> 1975, as adjusted, as the base period for our forecast of fiscal year 1976 results, except for Saturn’s DC-8-61 aircraft. For this aircraft type, our projections are based upon results for the year ended September 30, 1974, the latest representative 12-month Period available, as Saturn temporarily

3 Saturn subsequently updated its cost estimates for fiscal 1976 operations.

*“ Appendices A -l thru Appendix E filed as part of the original document.

“See Appendix B.

suspended operations with this aircraft type in November 1974.

Consistent with established MAC ratemaking principles, we have adjusted the reported results for known contractual cost increases, current fuel prices, and recognized regulatory depreciation and amortization. In addition, as discussed below, we have utilized a cost-escalation factor to adjust base-period cash operating unit costs to reflect the level of costs experienced as of July 1, 1975.

COST-ESCALATION FACTOR "

Although, as indicated, we have decided not to base our cost estimates on only the latest -quarter’s operating results, the Board does agree that use of reported data for a 12-month period understates the current level of the carriers’ unit costs. In our judgment, however, the appropriate way to reflect the impact of inflation is to adjust reported results by applying a cost-escalation factor to the data. The cost-escalation factor is based on a comparison of unit available ton-mile operating expenses (excluding fuel, depreciation and amortization expenses) for the domestic scheduled operations of the certificated trunk carriers for the year ended March 31, 1975, with those for the year ended March 31,1974, which reflect an increase of 8.55 percent.5

In determining the cost-escalation factor, the average unit costs for the year and the related variation from the prior year are assumed to be effective as of the midpoint of that period. Thus, in this case, such determination would be as of October 1, 1974, for the base year ended March 31, 1975. Since nine months have elapsed to July 1, 1975, the current level of unit costs may then reasonably be assumed to have increased further by about 75 percent of the experienced annnai trend, or 6.3 percent.* Although specific costs may have risen more or less than this average, we propose to apply this average increase to all cash expenses except rentals and fuel. We consider this to be a reasonable and appropriate method of annualizing current cost levels.7

ANTICIPATORY COST INCREASES

In forecasting future period operating results, the Board’s established ratemaking policy is to exclude anticipatory cost increases. Saturn claims that several of its labor agreements have expired; that the carrier is now in negotiations with various labor groups for new agreements, which undoubtedly will result in substan-

6 See Appendix C. The computation also excludes transport-related expenses.

«The 6.3 percent increase is derived from the sum of the square roots of 1.0856, producing an increase of 4.2 percent, and 1.042 which results in an increase of 2.1 percent. The square root is utilized in order to reflect the compounding of increases during the period. A 10.65 percent cost-escalation factor (8.55-|-2.10) is used for Saturn’s DC-8- 61 as 15 months have elapsed from the midpoint of the YE 9/30/74 base period.

7 See e.g., Orders 73-11-93 (November 20, 1973) and 75-6-72 (June 13,1975).

tial increases in operating expenses; and th a t in order to reflect these prospective cost increases in the rates, it would be appropriate for the Eoard to recognize a t least 75 percent of the cost increases the carrier expects to incur. Upon consideration, we have tentatively decided not to recognize any of Saturn’s anticipated labor cost increases. Our policy in this area is of long-standing, and is intended to avoid burdening the ratepayer with the cost of expense increases that the carrier has not as yet incurred..

The carrier's labor negotiations are at a stage where it is still too early to determine reasonably what the ultimate costs of its new agreements will be, and we, therefore, consider its forecast of future labor cost increases too speculative for inclusion in the forecast of fiscal year 1976 results.

AIRCRAFT SPEED

In projecting the miles to be flown in FY 1976, the Board utilized the average airborne speed as derived from data reported by the carriers. The DOD excepted to the Board’s determination of an average speed of 310 miles per hour for Saturn’s L-100 aircraft in Logair operations. Saturn had projected a speed of 312 m.p.h. based on calendar year 1973 results over a 560-mile stage length. However, operational economy measures instituted by the carrier in response to the fuel crisis have now resulted in lower average airborne speeds. A review of the carrier’s Form 243 reports for the six months ended March 31, 1975, does not justify the use of a higher speed for this aircraft type, and we have, therefore, rejected DOD’s contention.

The DOD also took exception to the Board’s forecast of a speed of 467 m.ph., over a 700-mile stage length, for Capitol’s DC-8 aircraft, while, a t the same time, we proposed a speed of 435 m.ph. for Saturn’s DC-8 aircraft. We now agree that the use of different speeds for like services with similar aircraft types is not appropriate. Based on an analysis of the latest available data reported by carriers operating DC-8 aircraft over similar stage lengths, we propose that an airborne speed of 450 m.ph. should be used for all DC-8 aircraft types for the projected 700-mile stage length in both Logair and Quicktrans operations.

FUEL CONSUMPTION AND COSTS

In order to estimate fuel costs for FY 1976 operations, the Board has relied upon information responses submitted by the carriers. These responses indicate the gallons of fuel consumed per mile flown for each aircraft type over their experienced average stage length. This fuel- bum rate was then adjusted to reflect the average stage lengths that would be operated pursuant to the current MAC contracts. The DOD excepted to the fuel- bum rates for the DC-8 aircraft proposed by the Board in its forecasts presented at the conference. Upon review, we agree that an adjustment to the proposed DC- 8 aircraft fuel-bum rates is appropriate. Information supplied by the manufac-


49796 PROPOSED RULESturer indicates that the fuel-bùm rates at a 700-mile stage length should be identical for DC-8-61/63 aircraft types and 6.19 percent less for DC-8-55 aircraft. Accordingly, we now propose fuel- bürn rates of 5.46 and 5.14 gallons per mile, based on experienced results, for the DC-8-61/63 and DC-8-55 aircraft, respectively, in forecasting FY 1976 fuel costs.

Consistent with our action in establishing the current final international MAC rates,8 we propose to eliminate the existing automatic military fuel price adjustment provision. The forecast reflects current fuel prices of 42.3 cents per gallon for JP-4 military fuel, 40.8 cents per gallon for JP-5 military fuel, and 31,64 cents per gallon for commercial fuel.® A review of first-quarter 1975 fuel-purchase reports indicates that about 86 percent of the fuel used in Quicktrans operations is purchased from the military and that this is divided almost equally between JP-4 and JP-5. On this basis, a weighted average price of 40.16 cents per gallon obtained for fuel used in Quicktrans operations. For Logair services we have used a fuel price of 42.3 cents per gallon because for this operation nearly all of the fuel burned is JP-4 military fuel.

In view of the continued uncertainty surrounding fuel prices, we propose to closely monitor this item. Should the prices for military fuel, as determined by the Defense Supply Agency, or commercial fuel as reported by the carriers, fluctuate significantly, we will consider adjusting the rates on a prospective basis in the same manner as in ER-896 for international MAC services.

LEASED AIRCRAFT

The Board’s treatment of leased aircraft for ratemaking purposes is set forth in § 399.43 of the Board’s Policy Statements (14 CFR Part 399). In general, that policy is to recognize actual rental expenses^ However, where rental payments would exceed depreciation plus return on investment computed as if the aircraft had been purchased by the carrier, the excess rental payments are not recognized.

Saturn contends that in computing the maximum allowable rental expense for its leased L-100 aircraft, the Board should determine ownership cost based upon the average acquisition cost of its owned L- 100 aircraft. The carrier argues that to use as the acquisition cost for determine ing maximum allowable rental expense the lessor’s basis in the aircraft is inappropriate because it does not indicate the potential purchase price of the aircraft to Saturn, which would include the lessor’s profit margin and capitalized financing costs. We are not persuaded to adopt the carrier’s method of determining the acquisition cost of its leased L- 100 aircraft. To begin with, we do not

« ER-896, January 17, 1975.8 Based on effective prices as at July 1,

1975 for military fuel and June 1, 1975 for commercial fuel.

agree that it would, be appropriate to determine the acquisition cost to Saturn in 1972 of a used L-100 aircraft based upon the carrier’s acquisition costs for its owned L-100 aircraft which were purchased over several years and include aircraft both new and used.“ In theory, the appropriate way to determine a reasonable acquisition cost would be to establish the fair market value of the aircraft in question at the time of the lease agreement. However, because there are not a large number of L-100 aircraft in commercial service, we do not have sufficient information available to establish a fair market valile for the aircraft. Under these circumstances, we consider the lessor’s basis in thè aircraft a reasonable approximation of its fair market value a t the time of the lease, and the carrier has offered no evidence to suggest that use of any other value would be more appropriate.

DEPRECIATION AND INVESTMENT

Saturn has suggested that, in determining its depreciation expense for services with L-100 aircraft, the board should use a service life of 10 years rather than the 12 years established in § 399.42 of the Board’s Policy Statements for four- engine turboprop aircraft. The carrier argues that use of a 12-year service life for four-engine turboprop aircraft is inconsistent with the Board’s treatment of four-engine turbojet equipment for which a 10-year service life is prescribed because the turboprop is based upon an older design and is, therefore, subject to more rapid obsolescense. Saturn also argues that the useful life for the L-100 aircraft should not exceed 10 years because of the possibility of structural fatigue of the outer wings in aircraft with more than 20,000 flight hours. With respect to the carrier’s structural-fatigue argument, the manufacturer has issued two service bulletins dealing with this problem calling for more frequent inspections, but strongly recommending that modification kits be installed which would enhance the outer wing life. Saturn has chosen the increased inspection frequency rather than incorporating the kits in their aircraft. Economic considerations might suggest the installation of modifications for the outer wings. Moreover, the last two aircraft delivered to Saturn10* have a new wing design incorporating modification and additional improvements. In any event, no concrete evidence has been presented to persuade us to shorten the aircraft’s useful life because of this problem.

As for the differing treatment of turboprop and turbojet aircraft, the 10- year service life for turbojet aircraft was adopted because the introduction of turbofan equipment effectively rendered the turbojet obsolete. However, contrary to

10 If w© were to use the carrier’s acquisition cost of its owned aircraft, it would seem more reasonable to use only the acquisition cost of used aircraft acquired at approximately the same.time as the carrier enteréd into the lease agreement,

io» November 1974 and April 1975.

the carrier’s statement, there is no evidence to support the assertion that the L-100 is an obsolete aircraft type. Information informally obtained from the manufacturer indicates that the aircraft is still in production, and that of approximately 40 aircraft produced for commercial services, six w'ere delivered in 1974. Accordingly, we are not persuaded by the carrier’s arguments, and we have used a 12 -year service life in establishing depreciation expense.

Saturn again advances a proposal for an eight-year service life for used aircraft. In the past, the Board has rejected this service-life distinction between new and used aircraft,11 and the carrier has presented no new reasons for the Board to alter this position.

ONA argues that because current market values for its DC-9 aircraft are substantially in excess of net book values, the use of book values in determining the investment base results in an inadequate return to the carrier. The Board’s established ratemaking practice is to determine the recognized investment base from the actual cost of flight equipment less accrued regulatory depreciation.“ The carrier has neither offered any evidence to support its contention that use of net book values results in the provision of an inadequate return nor established any compelling reason to depart from this policy, and we have, therefore, adhered to the established policy in determining the carrier’s investment base.

Saturn notes that the costs of compliance with new FAA regulations requiring installation of ground warning devices were omitted from the staff’s proposals at the conference. They estimate that this item will cost $13,300 plus an installation cost of about $1,900 per aircraft. This total of $15,200 per aircraft has been recognized, and it will be depreciated over the remaining service life of the aircraft.

AIRCRAFT AND TRAFFIC SERVICING

The staff had included landing, parking, and handling fees a t commercial airports in determining rates for Saturn’s services as proposed a t the conference. DOD pointed out, however, that the Logair and Quicktrans contracts provide for reirilbursement of these costs. Accordingly, we have adjusted Saturn’s forecast costs to exclude these items. However, we have included the costs for unscheduled, nondirected landings associated with performing the Logair and Quicktrans services.

At the conference, DOD also teok issue with a proposed projection of Capitol’s DC-8 aircraft and servicing costs. DOD’s position on these costs reflected lower expense levels than indicated by the carrier’s experience. The Board’s proposed forecasts for this expense, as reflected within the rates proposed herein, are based oh the carrier’s forecast, increased

« PS-45, p. 12.12 See General Passenger-Fare Investiga

tion, 32 CAJB. 291, 309-313 (1960).



by the cost-escalation factor. These results compare favorably with the projections for ONA and Saturn on these same cost items, and, we believe the proposed DC-8 aircraft and servicing costs are reasonable.

GENERAL BURDEN

Saturn believes that passenger service, promotion and sales, transport-related expenses, and the commercial operations fuel, landing and handling expenses should be excluded from the computation of the general burden ratio as they do not apply to domestic MAC cargo operations. The Board has adhered to its past procedure of determining the general burden ratio on a system basis. The carrier simply has not shown that there is a difference in the ratio of general burden that accrues to the cash costs for the MAC services than that for its system operations. The DOD objects, however, to the inclusion of fuel costs in assigning a ratio of general burden to other cash costs as distortive because the precipitous increase in the cost of fuel was not ac -. companied by a proportionate increase in general burden. Due to the three-fold increase since 1973 in fuel costs per gallon, we will modify, in this instance, our normal methodolgy so as to exclude fuel costs in computing the ratio of general and administrative expenses (less uncollectible accounts) to other cash operating expenses (excluding transport-related expenses).“

RATE OF RETURN ON SATURN’S L - 1 8 8 AIRCRAFT

The established return on recognized investment of 10.5 percent plus a provision for taxes would produce return elements of 11.73 and 10.18 cents per plane- mile for Saturn’s L-188 Logair and Quicktrans operations, respectively. This is about one-third of the profit margin similarly computed for ONA’s DC-9 aircraft which are common-rated with the L-188 for these services.“

Viewed another way, ONA’s profit margins for its Logair and Quicktrans services are equal to 13.5 and 14.4 percent, respectively, of its operating expenses, whereas Saturn’s margins are only 4.3 arid 3.9 percent, respéctively. Because such a margin could easily be eliminated by a slight increase in operating costs, Saturn has requested that a return floor be established to provide the carrier an adequate return.

In previous MAC casés in which a carrier’s investment in relation to the volume and cost of the services to be performed would resrilt in a precariously low margin, the Board has established a return floor,“ and we believe that Saturn’s situation here warrants similar consideration.

18 It should be noted that this is consistent with the manner in which fuel surcharges are. handled. The rate is adjusted to reflect fuel cost increases but general burden is not increased.

14 See Appendix D.“ See eg., PS-28 adopted March 17, 1966.

In our judgment, considering the profit margin being provided for ONA’s common-rated DC-9’s and current cost trends, we believe a return and tax provision of 20 cents per plane-mile for Saturn’s projected L-188 domestic MAC services to be fair and reasonable. As set out in Appendix D, this adjustment produces a profit-margin ratio to operating costs of approximately 10 percent for the projected common-rated DC-9/L-188 Logair and Quicktrans services. .

USE OF GREAT-CIRCLE MILEAGES

We propose to continue the multielement minimum rate structure consisting of a line-haul rate per mile flown plus a rate per directed landing. In the past, the line-haul rate was for a course- flown statute mile. The DOD has requested that the Board and carrier parties consider keying the line-haul rates to great-circle nonstop miles between the points served in domestic MAC operations. In support of its request, the DOD claims that course-flown mileages are subject to interim variations which create an administrative burden not commensurate with payment impact, and that this problem could be eliminated by establishing the line-haul rates on the basis of the great-circle mileages flown. At the conference, the carrier parties agreed that this revision would be desirable. Accordingly, the proposed rates will apply to the great-circle miles between pairs of points served.16

We have carefully reviewed the DOD contracts for FY 1976 and have compared the course-flown statute miles to the great-circle nonstop miles to arrive at conversion factors to be used in each class of service, by aircraft type, to provide the carriers with the same level of line-haul payments based on great-circle mileages.17

The following table sets forth the conversion factors to be used.

Logair

DC-fl-30 1.08231.0413Saturn................ ............... L-100

D o..................... ...............L-188 L 0777

Quicktrans

Saturn.................... T—inn 1.0351

RATES PER DIRECTED LANDING

As noted above, we propose to retain the multielement formula currently used in payments for domestic MAC services, including a fixed charge per directed landing, by aircraft type. The landing rate is intended to give account to cost fluctuations accompanying variations in the flight patterns during the contract year which MAC finds necessary to ac-

10 We also propose to amend § 243.8(e) to reflect that miles reported for Logair and Quicktrans charters shall be on the basis of the great-circle distance, in statute miles, between airports served, effective with the adoption of the final rule amendments.

17 See Appendix E.

commodate traffic flows. Thus, the payments are adjusted in line with changes in the number of intermediate military bases served by a flight. The landing and line-haul rates are complementary and computed to produce the projected cost. Therefore, if the compensation is to change, consistent with cost movement for alterations in flight patterns, the landing rate must reasonably represent the cost of landing the aircraft. The carriers contend that the current landing rates are inadequate and do not adequately compensate them when MAC requires additional points to be served.

The present landing rate of $150 for DC-9 and L-188 aircraft was adopted in 1967, and was later made applicable to L-100 services. The DC-8 landing rates were.subsequently derived based upon a capacity relationship. Since the establishment of these rates, costs have risen considerably. In subsequent rate reviews, these cost increases flowed into line-haul rate amendments whereas the landing rates were held constant. ONA has submitted an analysis indicating current DC-9 landings now cost $256. MAC took issue with this analysis and argued at first that no definitive support had been given for any change in the landing rates. However, at the conference, MAC did concede that the current rates were probably too low.

The more than 60 percent increase in total operating expenses since the last full-scale rate review,18 clearly indicates that the current landing rates no longer reflect landing costs, and supports ONA’s contentions. We believe the carrier’s position has substantial merit, and an upward adjustment to the landing rates is warranted. Moreover, it should be made clear that an increase in the landing rates is offset by a complementary reduction in the line-haul rates ; thereby altering the total payments only in the event of changes in the number of points served.

Accordingly, on the basis of ONA’s presentation and cost trends, we are proposing to fix a directed landing rate of $250 for DC-9/L-100/L-188 aircraft and $400 for all DC-8 type aircraft.

RATES FOR D C -8 AIRCRAFT

While the DOD does not contemplate use of DC-8 aircraft in domestic MAC services during fiscal year 1976, they do desire that a rate be established for this type of aircraft. As previously indicated,19 the Board believes that the DOD is entitled to such rate information in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of utilizing DC-8 equipment in future domestic services. Accordingly, we have established new minimum rates for DC-8 aircraft based on the latest available reported data and an estimated operational stage length of 700 miles.

M ER—733, adopted May II, 1972, effective July 1, 1971, and based on results for the year ended September 30,1970.

18 ERr-853, adopted May 17, 1974, at page 6.


49798 PROPOSED RULESI t is proposed to amend Part 288 of the

Economio Regulations (14 CFR Part 288) as follows:

1. Amend § 288.7(b) to read as follows:§ 288.7 Reasonable level o f compensa

tion.♦ * * * *

(b) For Logair and Quicktrans services, other than specified in paragraph(c) of this section:

Aireraft type

Line-haul rate per great-circle s tatu te

mileR ate per directed

■ landingLogair Quicktrans

D Ct9-30/L-188C _L-100-20/30............DC-8-55/61/63___

$2.4769 3.4667 4.9458

$2.3513 3.5324 4.8351

$250250400

2. Amend §*S88.10(a) to• : ^

read asfollows:§ 288.10 Computation of passenger-

miles and cargo ton-miles.(a) General rule. For the purposes of

this part, the computation of passenger-

miles and cargo ton-miles for charter service shall be based on no lesser mileage than the nonstop great-circle alrport-to-airport distance, in terms of statute miles from the point of origin of the revenue flight to the point of destination qf such flight, via such intermediate points as are required to be served by the terms of the DOD contract. If the direct nonstop airport-to-airport distance between the point of origin of the revenue flight to the point of destination of such flight, or between any pair of points comprising a route segment required to be served by the terms of the DOD contract, is 4,000 miles or more, and no intermediate points are required to be served by the terms of the contract, or are specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the mileage shall be computed via the routings which yield the shortest mileage.

* * * * *Appendix A. Summary of line-haul rates for Logair and Quicktrans services by carrier and aircraft type

Logair QuicktransEconomic cost

per course- flown mile

Line-haul rate Conversion per course- factor (app. B)

flown mile iLine-haul rate per great-circle

mile

Economio cost per course- flown mile

Line-haul rate per course-

flown m ile1Conversion

factor (app. B)Line-haul rate per great-circle

mile

ONA D C 9-30.........................Saturn L-188C___^..................Saturn L-100-20/30...................Capitol D C -8-65..— . . ..........Capitol D C -8 -6 8 -.- ...___. . .Saturn DC-8-61.......................DC-9-30/L-188C *..................L-100-20/30..............................

$3.1079- 2.9179

3.7459. 4.3860

- 5.2316 6.0597

$2.4822 2.2036

' 3.3292 3.3146 4.6602 5.4883

1.08231.07771.0413 ..1.04131.04131.0413

, $2.6324 2.37483.4667 a 9721 4.8257 5.7150

. 2. 4769 ........3.4667

, $2.7641 2.7701 . 3.8293 4.2742 5.1127 a 0179

$2.1474 2.3534 3.4126 3.7028 4.5413 5.4465

1.03511.03511.03511.03511.03511.0351

$2.22282.43603.5324 3.8328

•4.7007 5.6377 2.35133.5324 4.8351DC-8-65/61/63 8........................ 4.9458

* Total economic cost less $400 per directed landing for DC-8 aircraft and $250 per .directed landing for all other aircraft types.

8 Weighted on basis of great-circle miles per fiscal year 1976 contracts: 39.6 pet. ONA: 60.35 pot. SU N . - ,

8 Weighted on basis of aircraft assigned: Capitol 2 DC-8-55 =25 pet., DC-8-63 =37.5 pet., and Saturn-3 DC-8-61 =37.5 pet.

, Capitol 3

[PR Doc.75-28593 Piled 10-23-75:8:45 am]

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Docket No. 20509]

[4 7 CFR Parts 2 ,8 9 ]STATIONS IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT

RADIO SERVICEOrder To Further Extend Time for Filing

Comments and Reply CommentsIn the matter of Amendment of Parts

2 and 89 of the rules to provide for the use of frequencies 530, 1606, and 1612 kHz by stations in the Local Government Radio Service for the transmission of certain kinds of information to the traveling public.

1. On June 12, 1975, the Commission released a notice of proposed rulemaking in the above captioned matter.1 Comments were invited on or before August 18, 1975, with reply comments due on or before September 5, 1975. Several petitions for extension of time for filing comments were subsequently filed by Halstead Communications, Inc. (Halstead) , the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) and the United States Department of Transportation

140 PR 36778, August 22,1975.

(DOT). NAB requested additional time due to their vacation schedule and a large number of other filings which they were concurrently working on. Halstead and DOT requested additional time to complete experimental field testing of a radiating coaxial cable system which could be utilized under the proposed radio system. Resultantly, on August 18, 1975, the Commission released an order extending the comment and reply comment dates to October 17 and November 18,1975, respectively.

2. A second motion for an extension of time for filing comments has now been filed by Halstead Communications, Inc. In this motion, Halstead indicates that several problems have caused delays to the field testing of the radiating coaxial cable system, which is temporarily installed near an interstate highway in North Carolina. Operational difficulties with the cable system’s transmitter delayed field test commencement until September 5, 1975. Later, heavy rains from Hurricane Eloise halted all field testing operations during the period from September 15 through 22, 1975. Due to these unforeseen delays, Halstead claims it will not be able to complete tests and compile data before October 17,1975. Accordingly, it requests that the time for

filing comments and reply comments in this proceeding be further extended for fourteen days to October 31 and December 1,1975, respectively.

3. In its order released August 18, 1975, initially extending the time period for filing comments, the Commission stated i t could obtain useful information from this field test and considered it to be in the public interest to grant the extension of time. This opinion is still held by the Commission. Because of this and the fact that the time requested is not considered excessive, the motion is being granted to extend the comment and reply comment dates.

4. Accordingly, it is ordered, Pursuant to § 0.251(b) of the Commission's rules and regulations, that the date for filing comments is extended from October 17 to October 31, 1975, and the date for filing reply comments is extended from November 18 to December 1,1975.


Federal Communications Commission,

[seal] Ashton R. Hardy,General Counsel.

[PR Doc.75-28679 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

FEDERAI REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, .1975


[4 7 CFR Part 73 ][Docket No. 20550]

BROADCAST LICENSEESNondiscrimination in Employment Policies

and Practices; Order Denying Request forExtension of Time To File CommentsIn the matter of nondiscrimination in

the employment policies and practices of broadcast licensees:

1. On July 25, 1975, the Commission released a notice of inquiry and notice of proposed rulemaking in the above captioned proceeding and publication was made in the F ederal R egister on July 28, 1975. 40 FR 16967. Comments and replies thereto were scheduled to be filed on September 11, 1975 and October 1, 1975, respectively.

2. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting filed a Motion for Extension of lime in which to file comments in this proceeding on August 29, 1975. This request was allowed by the General Counsel under delegated authority from the Commission in an Order for Extending Time for Filing Comments, adopted September 4, 1975 and released September 9, 1975, extending the time to file comments and replies thereto to October 13,1975 and October 31,1975, respectively. 40 FR 42578, September 15, 1975.

3. On October 6, 1975, UNDA-USA, a national Catholic association of broadcasters and allied communicators, filed a Request for Extension of Time with the Commission seeking time to file comments in the above captioned proceeding until November 19,1975.

4. After thorough consideration of the pleading of UNDA-USA to extend the time for the filing of initial comments in this proceeding, it is determined that further delay by a grant of UNDA-USA’s request would not be in the public interest to effect an expeditious termination to this proceeding, in view of the fact that sufficient time was given originally to file comments and reply comments and a 30 day extension of time was given to allow for the filing of comments. It is determined that adequate time, by virtue of both actions, has been allowed for filing of comments In this proceeding.

B. Accordingly, it is ordered, That the Request for Extension of Time to file comments in this proceeding by UNDA- USA is denied.

6. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in section 4(i), 5(d) and 303 (r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and §0.251 of the Commission’s rules (47 CFR 0.251).

Adopted: October 10, 1975.Released: October 20, 1975.[seal] Ashton R . H ardy,

General Counsel.[PR Doc.75-28680 Piled 10-23-75,-8:45 am]

FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION

[1 0 CFR Part 2 1 0 ]STRIPPER WELL LEASE EXEMPTION BEGINNING NOVEMBER 30, 1975

Proposed ExtensionOn May 15, 1975, pursuant to section

4(g) (2) of the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973, (“EPAA,” Pub. L. 93-159, as amended, Pub. L. 93-511), the FEA submitted to the Senate and to

^the House of Representatives findings and a proposed amendment to the stripper well lease exemption of section 4(e) (2) of the EPAA, as implemented in 10 CFR 210.32. The amendment is designed to remove a disincentive to increased production from marginally-producing stripper well leases, which existed under the previous regulation, by providing that once a property qualifies as a stripper well lease on the basis of its per-well production for any calendar year beginning after December 31, 1972, the property will continue to enjoy'exempt status, regardless of any increased production in a subsequent year. ,

The May 15 amendment was adopted pursuant to the procedures of section 4(g) (2) of the EPAA, which provides:

If at any time after the date of enactment of this Act the President finds that application of the regulation under subsection (a) to crude oil, residual fuel oil, or a refined petroleum product is not necessary to carry out this Act, that there is no shortage of such oU or product, and that exempting such oil or product-from such regulation will not have an adverse impact on the’ supply of any other oil or refined petroleum products subject to this Act, he may prescribe an amendment to the regulation under subsection (a) exempting such oil or product from such regulation for a period of not more than ninety days. The President shall submit any such amendment and any such findings to the Congress. An amendment under this paragraph may not exempt more than one1 oil or one product. Stich an amendment shall take effect on a date specified in the amendment, but in no case sooner than the close

' of the earliest period which begins after the submission of such amendment to the Congress and which Includes at least five days during which the House was in session and at least five days during which the Senate was in session; except that such amendment shall not take effect if before the expiration of such period either House of Congress approves a resolution of that House stating in substance that such House disapproves such amendment.

Included with the May 15 submission to Congress were the following findings, required under section 4(g) (2):

It is clear from the legislative history, as well as from the language of the EPAA, that application of the allocation and price regulations to the first sale of crude oil produced from leases whose average daily production is 10 barrels or less per well was not deemed necessary to implement the overall congressional policy embodied in tibe Act.

The report of the House Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee Indicates that '‘pricing controls and forced allocation of [crude oil produced from stripper well leases] would unnecessarUy inhibit production” since “pricing restrictions imposed under other federal authority have demonstrably had the effect of inhibiting production from such wells.” The Committee clearly stated its intent “that a similar result should not be made possible by the Mandatory Petroleum Allocation Program called for [by the EPAA].”

SimUariy, the legislative history of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-153, enacted eleven days prior to the EPAA) contained a similar exemption for stripper wells, again indicating a clear congressional policy in favor of ensuring that price controls would not inhibit the- continued production from these marginally-producing properties. The Senate Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs stated the purpose ef the exemption as being “to insure that direct or indirect price ceilings do not have the effect of resulting in any loss of domestic crude oil production from the premature shutdown of stripper wells for economic reasons.” (Emphasis added.) Continuation of the existing regulation, however, would have effects contrary to those that Congress expressly sought to achieve.

The FEA finds that there is currently no shortage of crude oil available to refiners in the United States, and that this amendment will not have an adverse impact on other products covered by FEA regulations. These findings, however, although called for by the EPAA, are not necessarily material considerations in the adoption of this amendment, which is designed to encourage the increased domestic production of crude oil from marginally-producing stripper well leases, and thereby more adequately to carry out the intent of the congressionally-mandated stripper well lease exemption. The impact, therefore, of the amendment on crude oil and other products should be simply to displace with Increased domestic production the crude oil that would otherwise need to be Imported in order to maintain adequate and reliable supplies of .petroleum products. Continuation of the regulation in its present form, on the other hand, would effectively eliminate-this potential source of additional domestic crude oil, and would tend to accelerate the decline in production from marginally-producing properties. Accordingly, the FEA finds that the continued regulation of this narrow category of crude oil Is unnecessary to carry out the purposes and objectives of the EPAA, and that the effect of the amendment will be to promote the increased production of domestic crude oil, thereby decreasing the Nation’s dependence on foreign supplies.

This amendment is not'intended to effect any change in the method of measuring the number of barrels of production from a property or in the method of counting the number of production wells for purposes of the stripper well lease exemption. These aspects of the stripper well lease exemption were specifically treated in Ruling 1974-29 and Ruling 1974^30, neither of which is altered In any way by the amendment adopted herein. The amendment is also intended to have no effect on the Continued viability of Ruling 1974-28 (Inapplicability of the “Stripper Well Lease” Exemption of 10 CFR 210.32 to Gas Wells), which the FEA is currently reconsidering in a separate proceeding (40 FR 18004, April 24, 1975).


49800 PROPOSED RULESInsofar as the amendment might have the

effect of releasing from the celling price some crude oil that is produced from properties that lost the stripper well lease exemption because of production levels in excess of ten barrels per well per day during calendar year1974, the amendment will operate prospectively only. Therefore, for those properties In this narrow category, crude oil may be sold without regard to the ceiling price rule of 10 CFR 212.73, as of tiie effective date of the amendment. However, such producers may not retroactively increase the price of such crude oil for sales that occurred prior to the effective date of this amendment.(40 PR 22123, 22124, May 21, 1975.)

The findings and amendment were adopted by PEA after a rulemaking and public hearing. Notice of the proposed amendment was given on February 28, 1975 (40 PR 10195, March 5, 1975), comments were received from 33 interested persons, and a public hearing was held on March 21, 1975, a t which five interested persons presented oral testimony. Consideration of all the written and oral presentations led PEA to conclude that it had been correct in its preliminary analysis that the prior regulation provided a disincentive to increased production.

The amendment and findings were submitted to each House of Congress on May 15, 1975, and the five-day period for Congressional review began on May 16, 1975. The period beginning May 16, 1975 and ending June 2, 1975 included five days during which each House of Congress was in session, and during which neither House approved a resolution stating in substance that such House disapproved the amendment. Accordingly, as provided for by section 4(g) (2) of the EPAA, the amendment became effective June 3,1975 (40 PR 24517, June 9, 1975) for a 90-day period, the last day of which was August 31,1975.

On July 24, anticipating the expiration of the 90-day period on August 31,1975, PEA gave notice <40 PR 31925, July 30, 1975) of the adoption of an extension—for a second 90-day period beginning September 1, 1975—of the May 15 amendment. In adopting the July 24 extension, PEA noted that the May 15 findings, although called for by the EPAA, had not been deemed necessarily material considerations in the adoption of the amendment, the purpose of which is to encourage the increased domestic production of crude oil from marginally- producing stripper well leases, and thereby more adequately to carry out the intent of the congressionally-mandated stripper well lease exemption. Therefore, the impact of the amendment on crude oil and other products was seen as simply one of displacing with increased domestic production the crude oil that would otherwise need to be imported in order to maintain adequate and reliable supplies of petroleum products. Continuation of the regulation in its pre-May 15 form, on the other hand, would effectively have eliminated this potential source of additional domestic crude oil, and would have tended to accelerate the decline in production from marginally-producing properties. Accordingly, the FEA found last July that the continued regulation of

this narrow category of crude oil was unnecessary to carry out the EPAA, arid that just as Jhe effect of the May 15 amendment would be to promote the increased production of domestic crude oil, thereby decreasing the Nation’s dependence on foreign supplies, the effect of the extension would be to ensure the continued increased production of domestic crude oil.

The FEA also concluded that as of last July there was no justification to depart from the conclusions reached as a result of the rulemaking proceeding and contained in the findings submitted to Congress on May 15. Moreover, just as continuation of the regulation in its prior form would effectively have discouraged a potential source of additional domestic crude oil, reversion at that time to the disincentives inherent in the prior regulation might have had the effect of forcing the premature abandonment of many projects continued or begun in reliance upon the amendment. Indeed, the amendment itself, as well as the com-, ments and testimony received in the* rulemaking proceeding, reflect the premise that, to be effective, the stripper well lease amendment must continue in its present form on an indefinite basis, so long as there is a price differential between exempt stripper well lease crude oil and other domestic crude oil.

Therefore, on July 24 FEA reaffirmed its May 15 findings and again found that(1) the application of the Mandatory Petroleum Price Regulations to crude oil produced from leases whose average daily production is 10 barrels or less per well in any year since 1972 is not riec- essary to implement the overall Congressional policy embodies in the EPAA;(2) there is no shortage of crude oil available to refiners in the United States; and (3) extension of the amendment will not have an adverse impact on other products covered by PEA regulations. An opportunity was afforded, however, for comment from interested persons on the action extending the amendment in order to ensure that there had been no changes in circumstances such as would affect the validity of the May 15 findings. However, due to the exigent circumstances—the term of the original amendment was to expire on August 31, 1975, and both Houses of Congress were scheduled to be in recess during the month of August—the action extending the stripper well lease amendment was sent to Congress on July 24, pursuant to section 4(g) (2). (Due to the unusual nature of the May 15 findings and amendmerit, which were predicated principally on the need to remove an obvious disincentive to increased production, FEA did not anticipate receiving any comments that would affect the validity of those findings and the amendment; in fact, no comments were received.)

Inasmuch as neither House of Congress took any action disapproving the July 24 extension it became effective as of September 1. (Th'e expiration of the EPAA on August 31, and its subsequent extension on September 29, did not affect the length of the extension; see Ruling 1975-17, 40 PR 48341, October 15, 1975, for a discussion of the applicability of

FEA regulations during that period. The 90-day period which began September 1 will expire on November 29.)

PEA hereby proposes to extend again, for a period of 90 days beginning November 30, the May 15 ameridment to the stripper well lease exemption. There is presently no reason to question the continued validity of the May 15 findings. However, inasmuch as the exigent circumstances that prevailed last July are not present, PEA will afford interested persons an opportunity to comment on this extension prior to its submission by PEA to both Houses of Congress pursuant to section 4(g) (2) of the EPAA.

Interested persons are invited to submit data, views or arguments with respect to the extension set forth in this notice to Executive Communications, Room 3309, Federal Energy Administration^ Box EP, Washington D.C. 20461. Comments should be identified on the outside of the envelope and on docu- riients submitted to FEA Executive Communications with the designation “Extension of Stripper Well Lease Exemption Amendment.” Fifteen copies should be submitted: All comments received by Tuesday, November 4,1975, before 4:30 p.m., e.d.t. and all relevant information, will be considered by the Federal Energy Administration.

Any information or data considered by the person furnishing it to be confidential must be so identified and submitted in Writing, one copy only. The FEA reserves the .right to determine the confidential status of the information or data and to treat it according to that determination.

As required by section 7(c) (2) of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (“FEAA,” Pub. L. 93-275), a copy of the original February 28 notice was submitted to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) for his Comments concerning the impact of the proposed amendment on the quality of the environment. The Administrator had no comments on the proposal. During the ensuing rulemaking proceeding on the amendment, oral and written comments were received. The amendment, which was adopted on May 15, 1975 and became effective on June 3, 1975, is now proposed to be extended a second time. Inasmuch as this extension is merely a continuation of the current exemption found at 10 CFR 210.32 and in no way modifies its substantive content FEA has determined that the proposed extension is unlikely to have any adverse impact on the quality of the environment or any substantial impact on the Nation’s economy or large numbers of individuals or businesses th^t has not already been previously commented upon and evaluated. Accordingly, the FEAA requirements of section 7(c) (2) "requiring submission to EPA, and section 7(i) (1) (C) requiring a hearing have already been satisfied and neither a further submission to EPA, nor a further opportunity for oral presentation of views is necessary. • ¡p

This extension has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 11821, issued November 27, 1974, and has been determined not to be of a nature that requires an evaluation of its inflationary



impact pursuant to Executive Order 11821.(Emergency ’Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93-159, as amended, Pub. L. 93-511 and Pub. L. 94-99; Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-275; E.O. 11790 (39 FR 23185)).'

In consideration of the foregoing, Part 210 of Chapter n , Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as amended May 15, 1975 (as set forth below), and as extended July 24, 1975, is proposed to be continued in effect for a period of 90 days or for such longer period as may be permitted under applicable law, effective November 30, 1975, unless this extension of the May 15 amendment or any portion thereof is disapproved by either House of Congress before that date.

Issued in Washington, D.C., October22,1975. .

David G. W ilson,Acting General Counsel,

Federal Energy Administration.Section 210.32 is continued in effect to

read as follows:§ 210.32 ' Stripper well leases.

* * * * *(b) Definitions. * * *“Stripper well lease” means a “prop

erty” whose average daily production of crude oil, including condensates, per well did not exceed 10 barrels per day during any preceding calendar year beginning after December 31,1972.[PR Doc.75-28806 Filed 10-22-75; 12:23 pm]

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION[1 6 CFR Part 4 4 3 ]

HEALTH SPASExtension of Time To Propose Issues of

Disputed Fact on Proposed Trade Regulation RuleNotice of opportunity to propose is

sues of disputed fact regarding the proposed Trade Regulation Rule concerning Health Spas was published in the Federal Register on Monday, August 18, 1975 (40 FR 34615). The notice also set forth the text of the proposed rule and a statement of reason for the proposed rule.

In response to a petition on behalf of certain industry members, the Presiding Officer has determined, pursuant to the authority of § 1.13(c) (!) of the Commission’s Procedures and rules of practice, to extend the time for proposing issues of disputed fact for a period of sixty days beyond the original closing date of October 20, 1975. Accordingly, the record in this matter will remain open for that purpose until December 19, 1975.

Proposed issues of disputed fact concerning the proposed rule should be filed with the Special Assistant Director for Rulemaking, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. 20580.

Issued: October 20,1975. SRoger J. Fitzpatrick,

Presiding Officer.[FR Doc.76-28659 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[1 6 CFR Part 4 5 4 ]ADVERTISING AND LABELING OF

PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTSExtension of Time To Propose Issues of

Disputed Fact on Proposed Trade Regulation RuleNotice of opportunity to propose is

sues of disputed fact regarding the proposed Trade Regulation Rule concerning the Advertising and Labeling of Protein Supplements was published in the Federal R egister on September 5, 1975 (40 FR 41144). The Notice also set forth the text of the proposed rule and a statement of reasons for the proposed rule.

The Presiding Officer has determined, pursuant to the authority of § 1.13(c) (1) of the Commission’s Procedures and Rules of Practice, to extend the time for proposing issues of disputed fact for a period of twenty-four days beyond the original closing date of November 7,1975. Accordingly, the record in this matter will remain open for that purpose until December 1, 1975. General comments on the rulemaking proposal (that is, submissions other than those proposing disputed issues of fact) will continue to be received until a t least 15 days following publication of a “final notice” in this proceeding.

Proposed issues of disputed fact concerning the proposed rule should be filed with the Special Assistant Director for Rulemaking, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. 20580.

Issued: October 21.1975.Christopher W. K eller,

Presiding Officer.[FR Doc.75-28738 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[ 10 CFR Part 30 ]PERSONS USING SPARK GAP

IRRADIATORS CONTAINING COBALT-60Proposed Exemption

By letter dated May 18, 1973, the Ray Burner Company of San Francisco, California, filed a petition for rulemaking (PRM 30-54) with the Atomic Energy Com m ission requesting amendment of § 30.15 of the Commission’s regulation, 10 CFR Part 30, “Rules of General Applicability to Licensing of Byproduct Material,” to exempt from the licensing requirements of Part 30 spark gap irradiators containing not more than 1 microcurie of cobalt-60 in plated or alloy form.

A spark gap irradiator is a passive device needing no external source of power. I t is attached near a spark gap (used as an electric ignitor in a fuel oil burner) to enhance reliability of ignition and safety during the ignition sequence by utilising particular radiation emitted by radioactive material to maintain an ionized atmosphere between the spark gap’s electrodes and thus is efficient in preventing spark delay. Other methods of preventing spark delay (photoionization, thermionic emission, spark-ignited gas pilot flame) are available but they are less efficient and disruptive in the hot oil-burner environment.

It is estimated that ignition failure followed by ignition of fuel accumulation causes 60 percent of the explosions, including “furnace puffs”, in automatic and semiautomatic-lighted boiler furnaces. Damage to property caused by individual explosions is generally proportional to the size of the boilers involved. In typical applications, the spark gap irradiators are used in boilers, power plants, and other heavy duty equipment, but not in private home furnaces or internal combustion engines.

Estimates furnished by the petitioner indicate that the potential market for spark gap irradiators containing cobalt- 60 is approximately 6000 per year. The petitioner has also noted that in any given year perhaps 1 percent of the installed spark gap irradiators might prevent small explosions, furnace puffs, and near misses that might otherwise occur. The result of such occurrences would usually consist solely of damage to the boiler-furnace enclosure, with the amount of this damage to the enclosure estimated to range from negligible to a high of $2000 and an average of about $1000. This information would indicate that spark gap irradiators would bring an appreciable savings to their users.

Fuel explosions caused by ignition failure usually result only in damage to the boiler-furnace enclosure itself; however, it is possible that such a failure may lead, directly or indirectly, to a fire with consequent extensive damage to property or even loss of life. Although the NRC staff has no direct statistics on incidences of fires from delayed ignition, data are available as to the frequency with which fires are caused by general malfunction in heating systems. For example, tabulations of fire causes in the National Fire Protection Association’s “Fire Protection Handbook,” thirteenth edition, 1969, show that oil-fired heating and cooking equipment cause 4.7 percent of the fires in apartments, 1.2 percent of the fires in banks, 14.1 percent of the fires in boarding houses, and 3.0 percent of the fires in hotels.

Based on the above, it is the engineering judgment of the NRC staff that title use of spark gap Irradiators may in at last a few cases prevent fires that could results in extensive property damage or even loss of life.

The spark gap irradiator described in the petition is a circular spring with the cobalt-60 electroplated on a flattened end. The spring is clipped onto the burner nozzle so beta particles emitted by the cobalt-60 will ionize the air in the ignitor’s spark gap. Cobalt-60 provides adequate ionization in spark gaps over the 15-year useful lifetime of an oil burner, delivers small beta particle and gamma ray does to man (from an initial 1 microcurie of activity), and provides secure attachment to the irradiator in the hot environment of oil-fired furnaces because the cobalt-60 can be electroplated as a thin metallic layer having about the same coefficient of thermal , expansion as the spring itself.

Based on 1 microcurie of cobalt-60 per spark gap irradiator, it is estimated that the radiation dose to the hands of an


49802 PROPOSED RUfcESinstaller may approach 530 millirems per year beta particle dose and 140 millirems per year gamma ray dose. The; gamma ray dose to the gonads may approach 5.4 millirems per year under the conditions set forth in the proposed amendment. Similarly, for the disposal personnel, the estimated beta particle dose to the hands may approach 120 millirems per year and the estimated gamma ray dose to the gonads may approach 0.1 millirem per year. Evaluation of the potential exposure of individuals, including distribution personnel, who might handle such spark gap irradiators indicates that they would not receive more than 16 millirems per year to the hands and 0.3 millirem per year to the gonads.

The doses estimated above are small and well within the dose limits for individuals specified by NRC regulations (10 CFR 20.105). They are a small fraction of the dose liniits recommended by the radiation protection guidance of the Federal Radiation Council and the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

The small quantity of activity per spark gap irradiator and the relatively short half-life of the radioactive material involved would assure that only very small quantities of radioactive material would eventually be released to the environment. Based on the market estimate of 6000 per year for spark gap irradiators, about 0.006 curie of cobalt-60 would be distributed per year. The cobalt-60 activity originally present in the spark gap irradiators will decay to a much smaller quantity of activity during the useful lifetime of .the irradiators, so that only a fraction of 0.006 curie per year could be released to the environment from the ultimate disposal of fuel oil burners containing spark gap irradiators.

In consideration of the foregoing, the proposed amendment which follows would add a new paragraph (a) (10) to § 30.15 exempting from licensing and regulatory requirements the receipt, possession, use, transfer, export, ownership and acquisition of spark gap irradiators containing not more than 1' microcurie of cobalt-60 per spark gap irradiator for use in electrically ignited fuel oil burners.

The proposed exemption would not apply to the manufacture or import for sale or distribution of the spark gap irradiators. Criteria for the issuance of a specific license to conduct such activities and quality control and reporting require? ments are set forth in §§ 32.14, 32.15, 32.16, and 32.110 of 10 CFR Part 32, “Specific Licenses to Manufacture, Distribute, or Import Certain Items Containing Byproduct Material.” Prototype tests for spark gap irradiators containing cobalt-60 would not be specified in the regulation. Applicants for specific licenses are required by § 32.14(b) (4) to submit procedures for and results of prototype tests. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission would either approve the tests or require submission of acceptable tests to demonstrate that the material will not become detached from the product and that the byproduct material will not be released to the environment under

the most severe conditions likely to be encountered in normal use of the product. The testing requirements would be incorporated into the specific license.

The proposed amendment, in effect, would make the manufacturer or importer responsible for providing an approved product for use in electrically ignited fuel oil burners. The requirement for use in electrically ignited fuel oil burners would be met prior to the transfer of the product for use under § 30.15 by conditioning each specific license issued to the manufacturer or importer with the requirement of incorporating a spark gap irradiator containing not more than 1 microcurie of cobalt-60 in either an electrically ignited fuel oil burner or a container labeled with instructions for installation in such a burner. In addition, the manufacturer or importer would be authorized to transfer these spark gap irradiators to a person holding a specific license provided such specific* license contains similar transfer conditions to meet the end use requirements of the exemption. The subsequent possession, use, and disposal by all other persons would be exempt from licensing and regulatory requirements of the Commission.

Historically, Ray Burner .distributed for many years, under specific licenses from the AEC arid later the State of California, cobalt-60 in spark gap irradiators to persons generally licensed under § 31.4 of the AEC’s regulation, 10 CFR Part 31, “General Licenses for Byproduct Material,” or equivalent Agreement State regulations. The AEC revoked § 31.4 effective September 25, 1971. The effect of revoking § 31.4 limited distribution of products previously distributed under that general license to specific licensees or to persons exempted or generally licensed by other provisions of 10 CFR Parts 30 or 31 or equivalent Agreement State regulations. Also, by the terms of a § 30.18*(b), any person who possesses byproduct material received or acquired prior to September 25, 1971, under the general license then provided in § 31.4 is exempt from licensing and regulatory requirements taf the extent that such person possesses, uses, transfers, or owns such byproduct material.

Under the provisions of § 150.15(a) (6) of 10 CFR Part 150, “Exemptions and Continued Regulatory Authority in Agreement States Under Section 274,” the transfer of possession or control by persons in Agreement States who manufacture, process, or produce spark gap irradiators containing cobalt-60 for use by exempt persons would be subject tp the Commission’s licensing and regulatory requirements, even though the spark gap irradiators are manufactured under an Agreement State license. Such manufacturers, processors, or producers wishing to transfer possession or control of spark gap irradiators containing cobalt- 60 for use by exempt persons would be required to obtain a specific license issued by the Commission under § 32.14 of 10 CFR Part 32.

Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and the Com

mission’s regulations in 10 CFR Part 51, “Licensing and Regulatory Policy and Procedures for Environmental Protection,” the Commission’s Office of Standards Development has prepared a draft environmental impact statement in connection with this proposal to amend Part 30 of the Commission’s regulations. The statement is available for inspection by the public in the Commission’s Public Document Room at 1717 H Street NW„ Washington, D.C. Single copies of the statement (NUREG-75/086) may be obtained by request addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Director, Office of Standards Development.

Pursuant to the Atomic Enersry Act of 1954, as amended, the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, and section 553 of title 5 of the United States Code, notice is hereby given that adoption of the following amendment to 10 CFR Part 30 is contemplated. All Interested persons who desire to submit written comments or suggestions for consideration in connection with the proposed amendment and draft environmental impact statement should send them to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Docketing and Service Section by December 8,1975. Copies of comments on the proposed amendment and draft environmental impact statement may be examined at the Commission’s Public Document Room at 1717 H Street NW., Washington, D.C.

Section 30.15 of 10 CFR Part 30 is amended by adding a new paragraph (a) (10) to read as follows:§ 30.15 Certain items containing by

product material.(a) Except for persons who apply by

product material to, or persons who incorporate byproduct material into, the following products, or persons'who import fot sale or distribution the following products containing byproduct material, any person is exempt from the requirements for a license set forth in section 81 of the Act and from the regulations in Parts 20 and 30-36 of this chapter to the extent that such person receives, possesses, uses, transfers, exports, owns, or acquires the following products:

* ...» * * *(10) Spark gap irradiators containing

not more than 1 microcurie of cobalt-60 per spark gap irradiator for use in electrically ignited fuel oil burners.(Secs. 81, 161, Pub. Law 83-703, 68 Stat. 935, 948 (42 U.S.C. 2111, 2201); sec. 201, Pub. Law 93-438, 88 Stat. 1242 (42 U.S.C. 5841) )

Dated a t Washington, D.C., this 20th day of October 1975.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

S amuel J. Chilk, Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc.75-28774 Fried 10-23-75;8:45 amj

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40/ NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

notices49803

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigs tions, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section.

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYOffice of the Secretary

ANTIDUMPING: RECHARGEABLE SEALEDNICKEL-CADMIUM BATTERIES FROMJAPAN

Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value

Information was received on December 24, 1974, that rechargeable sealed nickel-cadmium batteries from Japan were being sold at less than fair value within the meaning of the Antidumping Act, 1921, as amended (19 U.S.C. 160 et seq.) (referred to in this notice as “the Act”). This information was thé subject of an “Antidumping Proceeding Notice” which was published in the F ederal R egister of January 24, 1975, (40 FR 3790).

On the basis of information before the Customs Service at that time, a “Withholding of Appraisement Notice” was published in the F ederal R egister of July 24, 1975 (40 FR 30993), wherein sales of the subject merchandise by Matsushita Electric Industrial Company were specifically excluded.

A'statement of reasons was published in the above-mentioned notice and interested persons were afforded an opportunity to make written submissions and to present oral views. Counsel for the other exporter investigated, Sanyo Electric Trading Co., Ltd. provided additional information which indicated that further adjustments to the home market price were justified for direct labor and assembly costs. .

After consideration of all written submissions and oral arguments, I hereby determine that for the reasons stated below, rechargeable sealed nickel-cadmium batteries from Japan are not being, nor are likely to be, sold at less than fair value within the meaning of section 201 (a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 160(a) ).

Statement of reasons on which this determination is based. The information available indicates that the proper basis of comparison for fair value purposes is between purchase price or exporter’s sales price, as appropriate, and the adjusted home market price of such or similar merchandise.

Purchase price was calculated on the basis of either the f.o.b. Japanese port price, with deductions for applicable delivery costs or the U.S. pricè, with deductions for selling expenses incurred in the United States, U.S. duty, ocean freight, import charges, shipping in Japan, export department expenses, and ''Inland freight charges.

Exporter’s sales price was calculated on the basis of the resale price to unrelated purchasers in the United States,

with deductions for selling expenses incurred in the United States, U.S, duty, ocean freight, import charges, shipping in Japan, export department expenses, and inland freight.

The adjusted home market price was calculated on the basis of the weighted average delivered prices in Japan. Deductions from these prices were made for the applicable inland freight costs, interest costs, and, where applicable, for differences in the costs of materials, direct labor and assembly: Adjustments were also made for differences in packing costs, and, where appropriate, for selling expenses which were limited to the actual selling expenses incurred in the United States.

Using the above criteria, purchase price or exporter’s sales price, as appropriate, was found to be not less than the adjusted home market price of such or similar merchandise sold in Japan during the period of investigation.

This determination and statement of reasons therefor are published pursuant to § 153.33(c) of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 153.33(C)).

D avid R. Macdonald, Assistant Secretary

of the Treasury.October 22,1975*[FR Doc.75-28840 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEAntitrust Division

UNITED STATES V. MANUFACTURERS AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION, ET A L

Written Comments Upon Consent Judgment and Department of Justice Responses TheretoPursuant to the Antitrust Procedures

and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16, the following written comments on the proposed judgment filed with the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York in Civil Action No. 72 Civ. 1307, United States of America v. Manufacturers Aircraft Association, et al., were received by the Department of Justice and are published herewith, together with Justice’s responses to the comments.

Dated: October 20, 1975.T homas E. K auper,

Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division.

United States D istrict Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK

United States of America, plaintiff, v. Manufacturers Aircraft Association, Inc.,

et al. Defendants. Civil No. 72 Civ. 1307: Mel.

RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS OP E. BURKE WILFORD

Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act (15 U.S.C. 16 (b )-(h )) the United States files this response to the comments and petition of E. Burke Wilford relating to the proposed Consent Judgment in this action.

1. Mr. Wilford urges that it is in the public interest that this case be tried. Mr. Wilford is an inventor who claims that he has been injured by the practices alleged in the complaint filed by the United States in this action.

If this case were to go to trial and if the United States were to prevail, Mr. Wilford could use such a judgment as prima fade evidence of a violation of law in a subsequent treble damage action which he might bring. It would remain, of course, for Mr. Wilford to prove in any such action that he was damaged by the violation and the extent of those damages.

2. The proposed Consent Judgment provides for the dissolution of the Manufacturers Aircraft Association, cancellation of licenses issued pursuant to the cross-license Agreement, and much additional 'relief. There can be little doubt that it is in the private interest of Mr. Wilford for this case to proceed to trial. Plaintiff urges, however, that the public interest is not thereby served. First, the public will by the proposed Consent Judgment receive full and adequate relief from the offenses charged in the complaint. Were the case to be tried, long delay in obtaining the relief that the proposed Judgment affords immediately, would be inevitable.

Defendants vigorously argue that the MAA license agreement is not unlawful; while the United States is confident that its view of the law is correct, no useful purpose is served in submitting the issues to a long trial when full relief can be achieved immediately upon consent. A trial would be expensive to the public as well as to defendants and would add to the congestion in our courts.

3. Mr. Wilford is, of course, not without remedy. He may bring an action under the antitrust laws Tor treble his damages plus reasonable attorneys’ fees. The chief element of proof of the conspiracy which he alleges is the Manufacturers Aircraft Association Amended Cross License Agreement. This agree-


49804 NOTICESment is a matter of public record in this action.

Dated: October 17, 1975.Lewis Bernstein,

Attorney,Department of Justice.

John L. Wilson, Attorney,

Department of Justice.United States District Court

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Manufacturers Aircraft Association, Inc., et al. Defendants. Civil No. 72 Civ. 1307: Mel.RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS OF DR. LESLIE

ERENYI

Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act <15 U.S.C. 16 <b)-(h)) the United States, Plaintiff in this action, makes the following response to the comments of Dr. Leslie Erenyi.

1. In a rambling and confused stream of consciousness presentation, Dr. Erenyi imprecisely alleges various conspiracies and criminal actions by the defendants including deprivation of Dr. Erenyi’s civil rights. Putting the comments into some order and logical sequence, it appears that Dr. Erenyi alleges that he Is the developer of certain concepts and systems useful in the defense of the United States; he alleges that he sought to develop and exploit these concepts and systems jointly with defense contractors and to receive equitable remuneration for this contributions. He alleges that he was prevented from doing so by reason of actions of some or all of the defendants in this case. Dr. Erenyi urges that this case be tried in order to fully disclose the alleged wrongful acts of the defendants. He does not object to specific portions of the Judgment nor does he propose specific additional relief.

2. Contrary to Dr. Erenyi’s allegations, he submitted no facts nor arguments which affected the decision to bring this law suit. In response to Dr. Erenyi’s other comments the United States believes that trial of this case would serve no useful purpose of public disclosure. This action alleges that a patent licensing agreement amongst the defendants was unlawful. That agreement and interpretative bulletins have been filed with the Court as Appendix I and n to the Judgment. Thus the principal item of evidence in the case is before the court and a matter of public record.

Were the case to be tried, the additional evidence to be proffered by plaintiff would seek to show the anticompetitive effects which resulted from the existence of this agreement. Plaintiff had no intention of introducing a t trial any evidence regarding the specific transactions, if any. between Dr. Erenyi and any of the defendants. We are not aware of any evidence which would disclose criminal violations by defendants.

Plaintiff anticipate^ that it could produce "evidence to show that the MAA license agreement did, in fact, reduce

the incentives of the defendants to develop or purchase patentable inventions. We recognize, however, that defendants could have produced considerable evidence to show that they did in fact acquire many patents by purchase or by their own research and development. Much time and effort would be required for the United States and for the defendants to gather and introduce such evidence. Submitting such evidence in open court would require many days of trial. Plaintiff believes no useful public purpose would be served by presentation of such evidence in open court. This is particularly true, when as here, full and adequate relief is available upon consent. This relief includes dissolution of Manufacturers Aircraft Association and can-, cellation of the MAA Amended Cross License Agreement.

3. If Dr. Erenyi has been injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of the antitrust laws by the defendants, he may recover treble his damages plus reasonable attorneys’ fees in an action under the antitrust laws.

Dated: October 17,1975.Lewis Bernstein,

Attorney,Department of Justice.

John L. Wilson, Attorney,

Department of Justice.United States District CourtSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Manufacturers Aircraft Association, Inc., et al. Defendants. Civil No. 72 Civ. 1307: Mel.

COMMENT OF E. BURKE WILFORD ON PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE

Is E. Burke Wilford is an individual residing a t Linden Lane, Merlon Station, Pennsylvania 19066, who developed the patents listed in Exhibit “A” (cyclic control) and those listed in Exhibit *‘B” (Cantilever rotor or hingeless joint) at a cost of $146,000.

2. Piasecki Aircraft Corporation (hereafter “Piasecki”) purchased the said patents from Wilford and, in consideration for the patents, transferred to Wilford 3,000 shares of Piasecki stock and agreed to pay him a royalty of one-half of one percent <V2%) on the use of said patents under licenses to others.

3. Piasecki joined, the Manufacturers Aircraft Association and subsequently became the Vertol Division of Boeing Aircraft Company, one of the Defendants herein.

4. Wilford is informed, believes and therefore avers that other Individual inventors, holding other aircraft patents, have entered into similar arrangements with the Defendants in this action.

5. Piasecki or Boeing and the Manufacturers Aircraft Association have never paid Wilford any royalties pursuant to the aforesaid agreement. Wilford is informed, believes and therefore avers that the Defendants have similarly failed to

pay such royalties to numerous other inventors in similar situations.

-6. The proposed Judgment by Consent Decree is inadequate and inappropriate because it will effect the dissolution of the Defendant, Manufacturers Aircraft Association without providing any vehicle for forcing that Association to account for such unpaid royalties to Wilford and other similarly situated inventors to their great detriment and injury.

Wherefore, Wilford prays this Honorable Court to withhold its approval of the Consent Decree proposed herein.

Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell,& Hippel

John P. McKelligott, Esquire, Attorneys for E. Burke Wilford. Patent Numbers—Exhibit A

1,777,678 2,068,618reissued 2,080,522

18,358 2,068,6171,975,124 2,106,7832,025,561 2,108,8391,957,813 2,136,1651,736,300 2,143,6882,068,616 2,155,8812,045,623 2,161,801

Patent Numbers—Exhibit

1,736,299 1,848,5551,772,586 1,950,4241,777,282 2,089,9891,832,338

additional patents still inforce

#2,961,051 Cantilever Rotors with restraint E. B. W. & H. E. Lamont Jr.

#3,285,538 Fan-jet Installation for Producing AirfoU Body Lift, owned by Mrs. V. J. BurneUi etc.

Also other airplane designs and patents of the member of the Aircraft Pioneers, Amer. Soc. of Inventors, etc.Leslie Erenyi P.O.Box 2653 Los Angeles, Cal. 90028 Petitioner

United States District Court

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKUnited States of America Plaintiff, v. Manu

facturers Aircraft Association, Inc., et al. (Northrop Corp., etc.). Civil No. 72 Civ. 1307: Mel. Comments and Petitions by Leslie Erenyi, re. Proposed Consent Judgment.

Under the purview of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act “Comments” on the Proposed Consent Judgment (dated July 15, .1975) and Petition (I) to the Justice Department Antitrust Division to withdraw its consent thereto; and Petition (II) for carrying on subject matter litigation of vital national defense and security-relevancy through its originally intended, crucial and indispensable trial phase and onto a definitive adjudication thereof; and Petition (ID) to amend complaint, in collaboration with Petitioner, to Incorporate, explicitly, 95-98% of action- abUity of pertinent antitrust conspiracies and industrywide practices only implicitly challenged by it; and Petition (IV) to the court to reject the proposed consent Judgment; and Petition (V) to grant a hearing in open court to afford oral presentation and arguments with supporting documents in opposition to the Proposed Consent Judgment, by Leslie Erenyi. Please Insert: ‘solely capable of achieving its (presumed) "good- faith” objectives’.


NOTICES 49805

It is with great reluctance and a deep sense of sorrow and apprehension that Petitioner fnrig himself unavoidably compelled, Anally, to resort to a much dreaded series of long- anticipated actions heretofore advisedly de- fered and abstained from, the present “Comments and Petitions” constituting the opening salvo thereof.

It was long hoped-for and diligently oft* attempted by Petitioner to prevail through his intensive and constructive, almost a decade of interactions with the responsible constitutional institutions and authorities of this Country engulfed in the complex controversies constituting the crux proper and derivatives and periferics of subject matter litigation, in avoiding the necessity of just such a, never timely, eventuality; i.e. an ultimate confrontation, as deplorable termination of an albeit woefully slow and arduous, by the nature of things, often strained and exasperating, nonetheless an amicable and constructive, collaborative rapport, in mutual^ respect, nurtured in a salutary evolutionary process aimed at the betterment, correction and general, controlled progress of our society and governing institutions and their all too essential and crucial amicable interactions.

In particular, Petitioner deplores the potentially inexorable ultimate confrontation, a dreaded reversal of a heretofore parallelly inclined, collaborative alliance having prevailed since the Inception of subject action, into a quasi adversary rapport with the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division, brought about by its ultimate capitulation, or at least a pro forma and hopefully reluctant yielding to a presumably critical concerted political and never too overestimated special interest pressure; in becoming an albeit reluctant critical party to subject Proposed Consent Judgment. Pending withdrawal on its own, or a judicious, responsible intervention of an alert and sophisticated Court, the Antitrust Division, in so doing, for the time being, exposed to grave jeopardy an estimated 95-98% of the subject Cause of vital national security and defense-interest relevancy, deferring it to be definitively adjudicated within a reasonable, never too early, time.

Furthermore, in so doing, the Antitrust Division has aggravated Petitioner’s original and long-standing dilemma regarding the advisability of exposing prematurely and to all risks and perils a more nearly full and specific written (thus abusable etc. passive, “hapless”, devoid of a “fighting chance” etc.) tensive personal experiences, a wealth of tenlve personal experiences, a wealth of pain- painstakingly accumulated and elicited, adduced and apprehended incontrovertible material and Incriminating evidences, and contemplated simple, straightforward, definitive and efficace remedying measures and restructuring propositions via judicial, regulatory and legislative means, to a not quite guaranteed and/or all-reliable and steadfastly enduring oí fully autonomous ally; (to wit, to irrevocably engage and deploy into an untimely battle, over an unfathomable, unreconnoitered battlefield, precious secret weapons in the trust of untested ally • . etc.); especially in a historic Conjuncture of extreme volatility and complicated miscarriaged pregnancy . . .!; adverse faring thereof, overwhelming, lest in case of irremediable prejudice, preemption, discovery, etc. should fatally burden their ultimate prevailance.

Such is the aggravated case now, when in the face of a pro forma or»dé facto, but maybe reversible settlement disposition Petitioner s conscience, responsibilities and duties, and vested interest would dictate an unreserved maximum deployment of our com- oative arsenal, in an acutely uphill and dls-

advantaged fight, to turn the tide, in extremis, and ‘in desperation of cause’; running the inadmissible risk of being swept away and under by the sheer momentum and vested interests (of psychological and pragmatic character) riding upon a “fait accompli” settlement-inclined wave-crest; irreparably prejudicing and impairing, preempting Petitioner’s legal posture, which, under the circumstances will be all the more called upon to assert itself for the vindication of the vital National Security and Defense interests at issue.

After much soul-search it is Petitioner’s determination that such a course of action is acutely contraindicated, at this instance, and that a mitigative, buffer measure must, against all odds, be attempted, with full reliance on the intrinsic integrity, good-faith disposition, sense of duty and responsibility of the Antitrust Division, its correct perception and assignment of order of priority of its allegiance and loyalty toward the competing interests . . .! and ultimately on the wisdom and honor of the Court.

It is in this spirit and determination, that Petitioner deems to be compelled to put forth the following mixed peremptory, and of necessity, perfunctory “Comments” on the Proposed Consent Judgment, in conjunction with the above-captioned hereby respectfully submitted Petitions (I), (II), (HI) to the Justice Department Antitrust Division; Petitions (IV), (V) to the Court, by this reference thereto.

In doing so, and in support thereto, Petitioner hereby asserts, invokes, claims, etc., in addition to those stemming from the relevant provisions of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, legal standing, prerogatives, duty, etc. in his quality as concerned citizen of the U.S., as Amicus Curiae, as one vitally interested party in the outcome of subject Litigation, as one who preponderantly or even decisively contributed to the inception, initiation and evolution of subject Action and has been engaged in intensive efforts to subject the pertinent, associated, background, perlferlal and Incidental etc. grave controversies to congressional, executive, regulatory, judicial and public-opinion scrutiny, in the course of which he assumed great risks and perils and withstood the most unspeakable, unthinkable series of concerted countermeasures criminally conspired for, instigated and orchestrated by the primarily implicated and lncontrovertibly incriminated Defendant Northrop Corporation which, for years, resorted to the most reorehensible, odious actions of its own, and enlisted, marshalled, subverted and perverted our constitutional institutions and other entities, including and beginning with the Presidency of the United States, eliciting, provoking a series Administrative, Diplomatic, Judicial astrocitles in the context to Obstruct Justice and silence and liquidate Petitioner; such criminal conspiracies are warranted and material to be pointed out here, as they reflect upon the utmost seriousness and desperate character of the defensive reactions of the. Defense Industry, especially of the most critically engaged Northrop Corporation, to the crucial challenge, represented in part, by the subject Antitrust Action, all the more so, since its critical relevance to vital National Defense and Security Interests, after the repeated personal “crisis-meeting” rapports through the years, can not be claimed to have escaped their realization, and that they, consequently, engaged knowingly and willfully in criminal conspiracies to Obstruct Justice and other warranted legitimate scrutinies of an Industrywide Conspiracy and practices which have the effect of aiding, comforting, abetting the (potential) enemy, thus treasonable; so indulged in by those whose primary concern and devotion is rea

sonably expected and naturally presumed to be for the most effective and expeditious. Unhampered constant improvement of the Nation’s Defense Posture!

Before Petitioner puts forth a number of specific remarks and observations on the subject Antitrust Action brought by the United States against the major Defense Contractors of this Country, a brief review of his reasonably presumed role and interactions will be in order.

In 1959 Petitioner commenced a conscious effort to explore the possibilities of an effective and equitable contribution on his part to the national defense effort. To this end he engaged the Interest of several Research and Development Laboratories, Directorates etc. of the Defense Department, with a number of original concepts, ideas, projects etc. deemed to have potential applicabilities in the domain of National Defense, along with the indication of the availability of a great number of yet undisclosed projects etc. of even much more Importance and consequences. The manifested interest was far beyond the expected, and enthusiastic discussions, conferences ensued as to the methods by which a constructive, intimate collaboration could be effected, on an equitable basis, in the course of which very flattering and well-remunerated offers for positions, associations, consultantships etc. were tendered, with a certain expressed embarrassment, nonetheless, as to the apparent lack of satisfaction of the “equitable” requirement. Along those lines, within the Military’s own powers, was contemplation of several R&D Contracts to be awarded to Petitioner, in the expectation that ultimately the process might progress to a full-fledged R&D & Manufacturing enterprise, a la analogy of other celebrated Defense Contractor Firms “built around”'certain creative individuals, which, at that level already meets the criterion to be “equitable”.

Petitioner, all the while cooperating in tentative efforts to that end, with nonetheless goodnaturedly expressed missgivlngs as to the realistic feasibility of this approach, with

xthe contemporary complex and red-tape hampered industrial-giant-oriented Military Contract-awarding procedures in mind etc., began to advocate the only rational, feasible, practical, and most of all, the only expeditious and warranted Approach, to with, that with the already established Military Contract-awarding intentions and associated great interest toward unreserved tapping of the Indicated creative potentials for the National Defense Effort, the Major Defense Contractors should be the natural processors of those concepts and projects, and even on a best-qualified basis, etc. regarding the specificities of certain of the projects, logically and routinely following .Contract-awarding procedures toward the main Defense Contractors, in “farming-out” the Projects to the best qualified, etc. bidder etc. for their “processing”. To this straightforward approach the most peculiar and bizarre, disturbing and unbelievably rigid and “entranched” “System Characteristics” were opposed, revealed, de- masked, smoked-out, etc., with nonetheless embarrassment as to the Military (Governmental) authorities’ elicited bewildered realization thereof, the gist of which could be put as follows: the Defense Industry, with the singularity of purpose which is theirs, and the tremendous power they wield, through the decades, surreptitiously and albeit imperceptibly, through innocuous-looking, dissociated legislations, executive-orders, directives and “policy-ordained” routines etc. etc., gained such overwhelming ascendance over their Military Partner in the celebrated “Military-Industrial Complex”, its infra and superstructure so intrinsically evolved and shaped to their own designs and “policies”, as


49806 NOTICESto render any such above described “reasonable” approach, in so utter contravention to their fundamental and ingrained policies and designs, squarely out of the realm of possibilities, indeed a prohibited, an outlaw approach. Tentative and gradually more vigorous Military pressure, While outside, and even more alarming while, tentatively, inside the Defense Industry (on instance, Petitioner, reluctantly, but with adequate-looking special provisions toward his end, having yielded to an employment-connected modus operandi with the Northrop Corporation) to break the de-facto and declared and documented boycott of.Petitioner’s (and of course everybody else’s “Proprietary” Ideas, projects etc., even in the face of expressed previously already established Contractual Military interests toward them, and pressure for their processing having increased to intolerable levels and repercussions.

These and associated most revelatory other experiences, innumerous prior and subsequent testing of the “System”, powerfully ferreted out an incontrovertible, intransigent iron-clad rule of the "game”, to wit: “either you release into The Pool, and unconditionally, without any say-so as to its fate, or even connection with, your, even the most valuable or important military- or defense- connected, project, idea, concept, etc., we don’t play . . .” !

By the term Pool, since they dare to speak only for themselves, ostensibly they imply the "microcosmos” (of the most totalitarian, autocratic and almost literally life-or-death deciding kind imaginable) community of the Corporation in question, as a rule of caution; but upon occasion one finds open, blatent, cynical admission of full reliance on their part, indeed the crucial feature of the enforceability of such “rules of the game” that none of the other Pools either will break them.

, Based on these excellences over the years, Petitioner fully realized that an inadmis- sibly, noxcious, mortal "System-deficiency” ravages the effectiveness, efficacy, economy; and fatally jeopardizes the ultimate objectives of the National Defense Effort.

Furthermore, and most significantly, the veritable, true motivations behind all t.v>ia was discerned and firmly Identified, which are indeed the only “rational” ones, all other popularly held attributions, upon analysis, for which the sophisticated Defense-Industry executives are deemed quite capable, reveal' themselves as “bad business practices”. Since the specificity and esoteric character of the subject matter are, indeed acute, we simply can not expose herein a treatise on the matter, the general complexity, intricacy extreme particularities of the Defense-Contracting activities need to be correlated with specific “business” attributes of the Defense-Industry, to render self-evident and incontrovertible-our finding: that the true, veritable motivation behind all this is a patently dishonest, callous, Irresponsible criminal and treasonable one, to wit: to defraud the United States, to misapply, deliberately sidetrack onto more profitable hardware-yielding or weapons-system-yiekiing Research & Development defense allocations, to withhold, defer» potential or de-facto breakthroughs until thè obsolete systems yield the optimum benefits to the Industry as a whole; to skim, at their leisure, from the Pool, (individual and collective, as connected with equalizing funnels, on the surface or equally effective, underground; one of the more visible and .almost “decoy-character”, ostentatious one, constituting the Grip or Hold by which the Antitrust Division undertook to shake the Conspiracy under scrutiny, as intensively advocated, urged by Petitioner in the summer of 1970 and ever since), the best, the cream of the concepts and ideas etc., (having

summarily expropriated them from their creator without consideration or any equitable arrangement whatsoever), to subject them to “inhouse” processing, secreted away from the Military, foç much later, opportune assertion of Proprietary Claims against the Military, if successful, whereas if not, to offer them up to the Military for R & D funding, along with the others in the Pool a priority deemed or found unfeasible unprofitable or worthless; and using abusing them as Interminable R & D “Milk-Cows”; etc. etc., in short:

To abuse, pervert and prostitute the concepts, ideas and projects; subjugating them to a scheme of defrauding the United States of the R&D Appropriations and dishonestly steer the ultimate weapon developments to more profitable and optimum business-yield systems, all of which is rendered possible only by a total control of Research & Development activities and policies industrywide, individually and collectively adhered-to, elementary prerequisite of which is the total deprivation of any and all legal standing of the originator of the idea.

Beyond the obvious, harmful and even dangerous effects of subject conspiracies, as stemming from the fraudulent motivations, there are nonetheless serious and dangerous secondary effects imposed upon our Defense Effort, namely the practically total removal of any incentive, stimulus, even inspiration for creative activities amongst the so deprived members of the scientific and technological community of this Country, which Is shockingly alienated, even hostilized as consequence of the utterly inequitable treatment it receives from the, particularly, Defense Industry. (Indeed, a surprising, but most significant! gradation is easily discernable between the Defense Industry Conglomerate proper, and the corresponding relevant attitude of the Consumer-oriented Industry; where the latter is much more receptive to propositions incorporating demands for equitable arrangements, whereas the Defense» Industry is absolutely unyielding in its intransigence . . . , which fact in itself being shockingly paradoxical and intolerable, unjustified, quasi criminal even on its face; reflects upon the undisputable existence of a conspiracy, combination etc.). If, in spite of the generally apathetic lack of creative incentive, stimulus, etc., sufficiently “practicable” inventions are made, a several years- long ordealsome enterprise is desperately undertaken to try to prevail with it “from the garage” in ludicrous pursuit of the pertinent technical variety of the “american dream” of yesteryears; sacrificing, in the process, saving. Job, family-concord, sel^-respect, etc., etc., until finally he decays and resentfully submits to the Imposed “rule of the game”; conservative estimate of the delay so introduced between the Inception of a concept and its ultimate “success” or “processing” within the Pool, as described, is 8-5 years. Clearly atrocious handicap for the United States Defense Effort! Consequences of long« run character are also mentlonable in the domain of unsalutary social evolution, further militating against subject conditions.

Petitioner, in full realization of the above considerations, encoqraged, "coached” by dedicated Defense Department officials and many other governmental and private entities, convinced of acting in the best recognized and vital interest of the United States, undertook an intensive and sophisticated campaign of openly and officially challenging the prevailing Industrywide Practices n-nd Pertinent Conditions, m a rsh a ll ing , engaging, invoking etc. the official responsibilities of the appropriate authorities and institutions, in the first instance, that of the Presidency. Jurisdiction, duty, precedent and tradition etc. all militated for such a course of

action, with the attendant justified misgivings that in the (anticipated) event of an unfavorable disposition on the part of the President himself, the intended campaign would precipitously turn into a kind of “total war”, pregnant with historic consequences. But it was deemed justified and worthy of the appalling risks and perils ; . , at the same time even gratifying to find oneself on the right side of the Law and of the Real Interests, (Defense Interests, yet) of UJ3. vis-a-vis th3 President of the United States, ànd if confrontation could be expected to be parleyed onto public awareness, the subject Cause could have its day in a really impressive and worthy Court of History. It will remain the task of historians to reliably account for, correctly assess and attribute the de-facto degree of causative, priming, conditioning, predisposing, triggering and even controlling effects of this campaign on the historic event of most apparent visibility constituting an apparent dénouement of the yet unsurfaced bulk of the so called Watergate débàcle.

These misgivings, apprehensions and implied advanced warnings of the anticipable extreme implications of a probable Presidential displeasure or even more serious, open or covert supporting alliance, “protection” of their conspiracies, were communicated through intensive personal conferences (crisis meetings) particularly, amongst others, with executives of the Northrop Corp., individually and collectively, specifically delegated by its President and Chairman, Mr. Thomas V. Jones, partially in the winter of 1969-70, prior to the launching of the second, decisive, defiantly challenging phase of the Campaign, i.e. a contemplated and subsequently undertaken vigorous “lobbying” in Washington D.C. for appointment, convocation of a Presidential ("blue-ribbon”) Commission to Investigate the subject controversy etc., parallelly with other efforts to elicit Congressional, Regulatory, Defense-Department, Justice-Department, Judicial (either prosecuted by U.S. Antitrust and other Divisions of the Justice Department, or by Petitioner’s own or class-action suits) and Public-Opinion scrutinies of the matter.

As expected, immediate, ever more desperate, hlneous criminal countermeasures were initiated by Northrop Corporation & its most formidable ally, Mr. Nixon and entourage (by then already personally and fully engaged in the controversy, through personal communications ip the course of the prior first phase of the subject Campaign, since Oct. 1968, prior to his election).

Against this background, and miraculously etc. having survived, and even consistently gaining on every etape, of an onslaught of a most unspeakable counteroffensive, that Petitioner prevailed in (presumably) preponderantly contributing to the causation of the subject Antitrust Action, at any rate to consider and so rely on it as a “bona fide” breakthrough event of capital Importance and significance, and an adequate vehicle on which ride not only the vital Defense and Security Interests of the United States, but of the ultimate fate of the subject Campaign as well, in capable and dedicated hands in the Antitrust Division, when ultimately it was initiated, as expected and awaited, on March 29, 1972, after a reasonable 1% years delay following a most obliging letter acknowledging some salient aspects of our rapport and several discussions on the matter. That letter was dated July 21, 1970, and signed in the name of the then Assistant Attorney General Mr. Richard W. McLaren, by Mr. Lewis Bernstein, Chief, Special Litigation Section of the Antitrust Division, and attached hereto as Appendix n .


NOTICES 49807

Sous Remarks on the Subject AntitrustAction and on th e P roposed ConsentJudgment.As stated above, making allowances for all

the reasonably contemplatable, discernible (or potentially lurking in the background) certain negative, Inadequate or limited aspects or scope of the Government’s Complaint; reasonably ralsable questions, in the light of Watergate-connected revelations especially, and in the light of the ultimate present settlement-dlSposition of the Antitrust Division, (in spite of the repeated, lengthy and intensive Telephone-communications with responsible high officers of the Division in an effort to ward off such eventuality) as to the true motivations of its initiation, its original chances of riding through the associated and surrounding upheavals, etc.. Petitioner welcomed it as a major breakthrough, which, if jealously monitored, interacted with, protected and nurtured through its evolution toward a TRIAL, was deemed capable of constituting a necessary forum, instrument, vehicle and weapon carrying to victory a “majority" if not “maximum” objectives of Petitioner’s Campaign in challenging the subject conspiracies.

Thought must be given to the possibility,

that'w ith all the best Intentions and good faith by the Antitrust Division, the veritable mission of this ACTION was a “rain-making” effect to be created amongst the Defense Contractors; or even worse, that a preemptive, delaying, decoy etc., a kind of “lightning- rod” effect be obtained aimed at silencing etc. any potential Plaintiff or “lobbyist”. The Court must jealously guard against even the suspicion of lending itself to a scheme of that kind, and assert its jurisdiction, once seized, over a controversy of such monumental importance and consequences, against a logical conclusion of a possible “bad-faith” Action.

The subject Action was deemed to constitute a breakthrough, additionally, in that it asserted Antitrust Jurisdictions over the dealings with an elusive, esoteric entity, the intellectual property, even though only to the extent as it was transacted by usurpators, amongst themselves, and the consequent detriment to the associated “trade and commerce.”

Once this charge is officially formulated, even though treating only one superficial or limited activity of the Defense Industry in the R & D domain concerned with Airplanes, the logical and selfimposed extrapolation of

the challenged offenses, and underscoring of their detrimental effect on the much more vital public and national interest than the “trade and commerce", to wit; the nation’s defense posture etc., is within reach, and Petitioner submits, is within the scope and potential of present Action.

There is no legitimate reason, why should not be fully marshalled any available set of laws, such as the Antitrust Laws, to bring to order and correct a crucial segment of our society concerned with the national defense effort, particularly so, in the apparent (?) absence of more drastic jurisdictions, dealing with conscious, knowing, willful sabotage of national defense effort, even though, the primary motivation is. a mere and “innocent” defrauding of the United States. Petitioner submits, that a Trial of this Action will adequately adduce the implicit evidences of horrendous crimes perpetrated on this country by the Defendants, and through its Adjudication, by virtue of simple, straightforward formulae, already within the Jurisdiction and Power of the Antitrust Laws, capable of liquidating them.

Dated: Sept. 12, 1975, Los Angeles, Cal.Dr. Leslie Erentx.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 40, NO. 107—FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

49808 NOTICES

C O A / F f o e u r I a l . —

■rAJdrrM to thr

Ol»«WM i«wlK»|f«| ,•ft«) h r iti «• Intlula and Numb««

K tfX eL: LB 60-0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Washington, i>.c . 20530

Ju ly 21, 1970

yC i v i l N o.

72 Civ.l307*MEL

Dr, L eslie Erenyi 1044 Spazier Avenue Glendale, C alifo rn ia 91201

Dear Doctor Erenyi:

This l e t t e r i s being sen t in response to your request for an o f f ic ia l rep ly to your o ra l request fo r action by the Department o f J u s t ic e ,

~'trCj>sor,tou4l S cu te tteU im e n » tJJ ’/•> US. ft*feme*ne/ tecurify m/c- restSm

On the th ree occasions th a t we met, and in j/AysJ/r tts <f A***,our several telephone conversations, you advised th a t *2» i ( {w .you have evidence th a t the Defense Department*is ;a s s is t in g ce rta in aerospace manufacturers i n .a c t iv i t i e s th a t are harmful to the public i n t e r e s t / You a lso have * and naftonjfinformed us that these aerospace manufacturers a re " Secofrfyengaged in an an t i t r u s t consp iracy . In ad d itio n , you s ta ted th a t o f f ic ia ls ' of these companies have deprived you of your c iv i l r ig h ts , and because of th e ir d es ire ' *,to suppress the xniormation which you possess, you believe th a t your l i f e is in danger,

(p?n, br jien ¡ohnhdsticns obte'/n en d ed J

A 1 pointed out to you the ju r is d ic t io n o f the A n titru s t, Criminal and C iv il Eights D ivisions of the Department of J u s tic e , re sp ec tiv e ly , and advised you o f the appropriate procedure for making complaints forV io lations o f crim inal and c iv i l r ig h ts laws. 1 a lso ;

* *

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEWASHINGTON. D. C. 20530

OFFICIAL OUSINCSS

ror.TAGC ANtT rct:l PAIO * U S ,

onpAntMENT o r jin r.o •

O APPENDIX II, / od . / - 2 \

t lY Ia r I 1 p Frpnv)


NOTICES 49809

.* • V«¿ J H

s t a t e d t h a t I would In q u ire In to th e n n t i t r u s t a s p e c ts o f th e long s ta n d in g «agreement among n i r c r .a f t m a n u fa c tu re rs to p o o l p a te n ts and to c h a n n e l a l l in v e n t io n s i n to one combined g ro u p . You in d ic a te d t h a t such «agreement co u ld be b e n e f i c i a l , b u t t h a t i t was b e in g a b u se d .

* jve resis/tét/cmr -,

%. V * I s

*8 I x ^

• y U ' l

S K ‘

f tis um p

t f »3#&SV .0 4sSj ï

Ml à

ü $. : vw

^ 45 •<§ 5 $> :£^ ^ Vj(V 1)

N ^ \

IK *—»£-:«m *v $cm<*

I t r u s t th a t t h i s co n firm s o u r c o n v e r s a t io n « .

* S in c e r e ly y o u rs ,

KlCfjAK!) V/, ^elAHKN A s s i s t l a n t A t t b r / i o y C o u e r . a l

•* « 1 <iihh l< -«.¡..pf-.tki'r «

/^ .7< ^^s i / / •> 1..P . « e t i irc i* oQ 72 q SUSi 1-41:55 />£ . '

T h u J u s t i c e Pepartnfit'ni in* nmmcol it f a cU II .lntitruf» m t

* In New York rharj'ijic; «¿«it «*1 the > nation's airctaf* Industry with clini*

V inatiny competition for pvont.itil.* ’¿inventions related V» an piano put* I'duttion.

htiylnj interest continue.! to <1! tnlnUh as storie marl way to .lipht pioîit, third in » iiv\. j.,,w.’ ones tn»!v tris’ a v e r a c tt ended <)

An t L ira s t I) t vJ « ion

/By L t t y i s f io r i i s e « I n ’

C h ie f I S p e c ia l h i l i g a t i o n S e c t io n


49810 NOTICESDr. Leslie Erenyi 2653 P.O. Box,Los Angeles, Calif. 90028

Civil No. 72 Civ. 1307:MEL.APPENDIX I.—Preliminary list of sup

porting documents (inter alia) intended to submit in the support of Petition V.

1. Reg. Letter May 16, '73 to Sen. Tunney;2. Telegram/Reg. Lett. June 17, ’73 to Sen.

Tunney;3. Telegram/Reg. Lett. Apr. 10, ’74 to Sen.

Tunney;4. Answer by Sen. Tunney May 2, ’74 plus

5 Reg. Lett. Receipts.5. Letter July 21, 1970 by Antitrust Div.

Justice Dept.6. U.S. Govt.’s Antitrust Suit of March 29,

1972; v. Defendant Northrop Corp. et al.;7. Telegr ./Reg. Lett. Oct. 1, 1972 to North-

rop/Thomas V. Jones, Pres.8. Reg. Lett, to Supervsr Baxter Ward;9. Telegr. to Pres. Nixon, Feb. 6, 1970;10. L.A. Times article May 2, '74 on North

rop;11. L.A. Times article Apr. 27, 1974 on

Northrop;12. Reg. Lett, to Rep. Jerome Waldle/“Ro-

dino Committee”, of May 5, 1974;13. Reg. Lett. June 9, 1974 to Special

Prosecutor Leon Jaworski;14. Telegram Oct. 29, 1968 to nominee

Richard Nixon, plus; response “Express” of Nov. 2, 1968;

15. Letter of Nov. 10, 1968 to Pres.-elect Richard M. Nixon;

16. Telegrams to Clark Clifford, Seer, of Defense, of Dec. 15, 1968 and to Pres.-elect Nixon of Dec. 15, 1968;

17. Telegrams re. General Dynamics of Oct. 10, 1968, Oct. 21, 1968, Oct. 25, 1968, Dec. 15, 1968;

18. Telegrs. Dec. 15, 1968 to Time-Life Magazine; and to General Dynaipics;

19. Telegr. July 9, 1970 to Pres. R. M. Nixon 4- New York Times; pp. 1-3;

20. Telegr. July 17, 1970 to Pres. R. M. Nixon et al. (4);

21. Telegr/Reg. Lett. June 7,1970 to Melvin Laird, Seer, of Defense;

22. Northrop Corp.’s Research Section Organization-Roster & Chart;

23. Excerpt from R. M. Nixon’s book “Six Crises”;

24. Criminal Complaint pp. 1-36, filed with: D.A., L.A. County Grand Jury, TJ.S. Grand Jury, Commission on Judicial Qualifications, Sunervisor Baxter Ward, Sen. J. V. Tunney;

25. Re! Civil'No. 74-1455 :F, Jay Springer et al. vs. Thomas V. Jones, Northrop Corp. et al. Notice of Intention to APPEAR by Leslie Erenyi on Hearing set for Jan. 20, 1975, Los Anereles, U.S. Court.

• 26. Reporter’s Transcript of Proceedings on Hearing, TT.S. Distr. Court, L.A. Jan. 20, 1975; Civ. 74-1455 :F, Statement by Leslie Erenyi pp. 13-21.

27. Telegr./Reg. Letter to Federal Bureau of Investigation, Jan. 27, ’75; re. Hearing of Jan. 20,1975 by Erenyi.

[FR Doc.75-28646 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am)

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORBureau of Reclamation

GENERAL ADJUSTMENTS IN POWER RATES

Notice of Change in Location for Public Comment Forum on Tentative Power Rate AdjustmentsRio Grande P roject (S outhwest

R egion)On October 6,1975, the Department of

the Interior published in the F ederal

R egister (40 FR 46140) a schedule of the public comment forums. All customers of the Rio Grande Project requested that the location of the public comment forum be changed from Amarillo, Texas, to . Albuquerque, New Mexico. The purpose of this notice is to inform the public of the following change in location only of the public comment forum Jor the Rio Grande Project (.Southwest Region) :Federal Building, Room 4210, 517 Gold South

west, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Dated: October 17, 1975.

G. G. S tamm,Commissioner of Reclamation.

[FR Doc.75-28634 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

Office of the SecretaryCOMMITTEE ON FUTURE ENERGY PROSPECTS NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL

MeetingNotice is hereby given for the following

meeting : The Committee on Future Energy Prospects of the National Petroleum Council will meet on Thursday, November 13, 1975 in the Mount Vernon Room, The Madison Hotel, 15th & M Streets NW., Washington, D.C., starting at 10 a.m.

The agenda includes the following items:

1. Discuss an outline for a study in response to the Assistant Secretary of the Interior’s request for the preparation of a critique and outline for an update of the 1972 U.S. Energy Outlook study.

2. Discuss an organizational structure for the Committee and its subgroups.

3. Discuss a timetable for completion of the study.

4. Discuss any other matters pertinent to the overall assignment of the Committee.

The purpose of the National Petroleum Council is to provide advice, information and recommendations to the Secretary of the Interior, upon request, upon any matter relating to petroleum or the petroleum industry.

The meeting will be open to the public to thè extent that space and facilities permit. Any member of the public may file a written ¡Statement with the Council either before or after the meeting. Interested persons who wish to speak at the meeting must apply to the Council and obtain approval in accordance with its established procedures.

Further information with respect to this meeting may be obtained from Ben Tafoya, Office of the Assistant Secretary- Energy and Minerals, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., telephone number 343-6226.

Dated: October 21, 1975.Harry C. McK ittrick,

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc.75-28691 Filed 10-23-75)8:45 ami

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURECommodity Credit Corporation

[Arndt. 4]SALES OF CERTAIN COMMODITIESMonthly Sales List (Fiscal Year Ending

June 30,1976)The CCC Monthly Sales List for the

fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, published at 40 FR 30510 is amended as follows:

1. The last sentence of Section 1(b) entitled “General” published at 40 FR 30511 is revised to read as follows: Interest at 9 percent will be charged for delinquent payments on consignment and track grain sales.

2. The provisions of Section 27 entitled “Nonfat Dry Milk—Unrestricted Use Sales” published at 4Q FR 30512 are revised to read as follows:

U.S. Extra Grade: Market price, but not less than the following announced prices for spray process nonfat dry milk (NDM) in 50 pound bags: 70 cents per pound for NDM in bags of type specified in ASCS Announcement CMO-1. 69.75 cents per pound for NDM in commercial type bags.

U.S. Standard Grade: U.S. Extra Grade price minus 1 cent. Sales are in carlots only in-store at storage location of products. Sales are made under Announcement MP-14.

3. The provisions of Section 29 entitled “Butter—Unrestricted Use Sales” published at 40 FR 44172 are deleted.

4. Section 33 entitled “Peanuts Farmers Stock—Unrestricted Use Sales” published a t 40 FR 30512 Is revised to read as follows: 33. Peanuts Farmers Stock— Restricted Use Sales (FOB Point of Storage) The minimum price is the market price but not less than the following formula price:

1. Segregation 1 lots (loan classification). The formula price is 100 percent of the 1975 crop price support value (prior to the deduction for storage, handling and inspection) for the applicable location- tvpe and quality, plus the markup below.

2. Segregation 2 lots (loan classification). The formula price is 24.50 cents per pound of total kernel content (TKC) plus the markup below. Adjustments for oil and ammonia content will be made after delivery per Announcement PV- P-FS-1.

3. Markuns. October 1975—None, November 1975—None, December 1975 through June 1976—On December 1,1975 a markup will begin to accumulate at the rate of 55 cents per net ton per week (farmers stock basis) for Segregation 1 peanuts and .03 cents per pound TKC per week for segregation 2 peanuts.

Alternative Uses of a Lot. 1. Export as farmer stock peanuts. 2. Domestic crushing. 3. Export for crushing and shipped in bulk, or fragmented if shipped in bags or containers. 4. Milled to US No. 1 or better grade shelled peanuts for export with remaining kernels to be crushed domestically or exported for crushing in


NOTICES 49811

bulk, or fragmented if in bags or containers.

Sales are made under announcment PV-P-FS-1. When stocks are available lot lists or invitations to bid will be issued by peanut associations for submission of competitive bids each Tuesday to the Prairie Village ASCS Commodity Office. Association addresses are: GPA Peanut Association Camilla, Ga. 31730, Peanut Growers Cooperative Marketing Association Franklin, Va. 23851, Southwestern Peanut Growers* Association Gorman, Texas 76454.(Sec. 4, 62 Stat. 1070, as amended (15 U.S.C. 714b); sec. 407, 63 Stat. 1055, as amended (7 Ü.S.O. 1427) )

Effective Date: 2:30 p,m. (EDT) September 30, 1975.

Signed a t Washington, D.C. on October 17, 1975.

K enneth E. F rick, Executive Vice President,

Commodity Credit Corporation.[PR Doc.75-28733 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

Farmers Home Administration [Notice of Designation No. A263]

SOUTH DAKOTA Designation of Emergency Areas

The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that farming, ranching, or aquaculture operations have been substantially affected in the following South Dakota Counties as. a result of a blizzard March 22 to 29,1975 :Dewey Ziebach

Therefore, the Secretary has designated these areas as eligible for Emergency loans, pursuant to the provisions of the Consolidáted Farm and Rural Development Act, as amended by Public Law 94-68, and the provisions of 7 CFR 1832.3(b) including the recommendation of Governor Richard F. Kneip that such designation be made.

Applications for Emergency loans must be received by this Department no later than «-November 25, 1975, for physical losses and June 28, 1976, for production losses, except that qualified borrowers who receive initial loans pursuant to this designation may be eligible for subsequent loans. The urgency of the need for loans in the designated areas makes it impracticable and contrary to the public interest to give advance notice of proposed rule making and invité public participation.

Done at Washington, D.C., this 16th day of October, 1975.

Denton E. S prague,* Acting Administrator,

Farmers Home Administration.[FRDoc.75-28734 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON STATE AND PRIVATE FORESTRY

MeetingThe Advisory Committee on State and

Private Forestry will meet in Jekyll Is

land, Georgia, November 18-20,1975. The meeting will convene a t 8:15 a.m. on November 18 in the Buccaneer Hotel, Jekyll Island, Georgia.

This Committee, comprised of 15 members from a broad spectrum of geographic and interest areas, advises the Secretary of Agriculture and various agencies of the Department on the protection, management and development of the Nation’s non-Federal forest land and resources. Robert Long, Assistant Secretary for Conservation, Research and Education is Chairman of the Committee. He and representatives of the Forest Service, Extension Service, Soil Conservation Service, and Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service will attend from the Department of Agriculture.

The meeting is structured to provide members of the Committee ample time for discussion. Key issues to be included are: (1) EPA’s Suggested Forest Practices Act, (2) Rural Community Fire Program, (3) Resources Planning Act,(4) Southern Pine Beetle Control, (5) Youth and Manpower Programs in Forest Conservation, and (6) Research Implementation. The Committee will provide advice on these and other issues concerning the cooperative forestry programs.

The meeting will be open to the public. Persons who wish to attepd should notify the Committee’s Executive Secretary, Paul Johnson, USDA-Forest Service, Room 3107, South Building, Washington, D.C. 26250, telephone 202-447- 7065. Written statements may be filed with Committee before or after the meeting.

W illiam E. Murray,Acting Deputy Chief for State and

Private Forestry.October 20, 1975.

[FR Doc.75-28735 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

" Forest ServiceCASCADE HEAD SCENIC-RESEARCH

AREA ADVISORY COUNCILMeeting

The Cascade Head Scenic-Research Area Advisory Council will meet on Friday and Saturday, November 14th and 15th, 1975, at the Dunes Motel in Lincoln City, Oregon. The meeting on Friday will be from 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. and from 7:00 to 10:00 p.m. Saturday’s meeting will start a t 8:00 am .

The purpose of this meeting is for the Advisory Council to formulate their recommendations on the management direction for the Scenic-Research Area. The Council will consider the tentative management alternatives reviewed at their meeting held in October in making their recommendation.

The meeting will be open to the public. Persons who wish additional information concerning the meeting should contact Linda Penney, Hebo Ranger Station, Hebo, Oregon, phone 392-3161, ext. 33, or Edlu Allert, Siuslaw National Forest,

a t 545 SW Second Street, Corvallis, Oregon, phone 752-4211, ext. 510.

Dated: October 15,1975.F . Dale Robertson,

Forest Supervisor.[FR Doc.75-28668 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

GRAND MESA NATIONAL FOREST GRAZING ADVISORY BOARD

MeetingThe Grand Mesa National Forest

Grazing Advisory Board meeting scheduled October 22, 1975 at 7:30 p.m. at the Mesa-North End District Office in Grand Junction, Colorado was not held.

Dated: October 17,1975.Gerald W. Nyborg,

Acting Forest Supervisor.[FR Doc.75-28669 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEBureau of the Census

SURVEY OF RETAIL SALES, PURCHASES, AND INVENTORIES

Consideration to Continue SurveyNotice is hereby given that the Bu

reau of the Census is considering a proposal to repeat in 1976 the Annual Retail Trade Survey, which has been conducted each year since 1951 (except 1954) under Title 13, United States Code, sections 181, 224, and 225. This survey is conducted to collect data covering year-end inventories, purchases, and annual sales of retail trade establishments. This survey, which would provide data for 1975, is the only continuing source available on a comparable classification and timely basis for use as a benchmark for developing monthly retail inventory estimates. It also assists in establishing a benchmark for the distribution of monthly sales by geographic area.

Information and recommendations received by the Bureau of the Census indicate that the data will have significant application to the needs of the public, the distributive trades, and governmental agencies, and that the data are not publicly available from nongovernment or other governmental sources.

Such a survey, if conducted, shall begin not earlier than November 24, 1975.

Reports will be required only from a selected sample of retail establishments in the United States. The sample will provide, with measurable reliability, statistics on the subjects specified above. Reports will be requested from a sample of stores, with probability of selection based on their sales size. A group of the largest firms, in terms n f number of retail stores, will be requested to report their sales and number of stores by county; however, firms participating in the Bureau’s monthly geographic area survey will be asked to report a t the national level only.

Copies of the proposed forms and a description of the collection methods are available upon request to the Director,


49812

Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. 20233.

Any suggestions or recommendations concerning the subject-matter of this proposed survey will receive consideration if submitted in writing to the Director of the Bureau of the Census within 30 days of this notice.

Dated: October 21, 1975.Vincent P. Barabba,

' Director,Bureau of the Census.

[PR Doc.75-28709 Piled 10-23-75; 8:45 ami

Maritime AdministrationDIESEL MERCHANT SHIP

CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMAvailability of Maritime Administration

Standard Specifications for Diesel Merchant Ship ConstructionThe Maritime Administration has pre

pared a publication entitled “Maritime Administration Standard Specifications for Diesel Merchant Ship Construction” for use as a guide in Diesel powered cargo ship design.. I t wil also show all measurement units in both the System International (SI) Metric and the English systems. A limited number of copies of the draft are available to interested parties for review and comment. Requests for the specifications should be directed to William G. Bullock, Chief, Division of Engineering, Room 4525, U.S. Department of Commerce, Maritime Administration, Washington, D.C. 20230.

Dated: October 21,1975.By order of the Maritime Subsidy

Board, Maritime Administration.James S. Dawson, Jr.,

Secretary.[PR Doc.75-28737 Filed 10-23-76;8:45 am]

[Docket No. S-471]ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO.

ApplicationNotice is hereby given that Atlantic

Richfield Company (Operator), 515 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, California 90051, has filed an application dated October 9, 1975, as amended, to amend its Operating-Differential Subsidy Agreement, Contract No. MA/MSB-270 (the Agreement) by adding the tankers ARCO ENTERPRISE and ARCO HERITAGE. The Operator engages in the carriage of export bulk raw and processed agricultural commodities from the United States (UJ3.) to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (U.S.S.R.). Liquid and dry bulk cargoes may be carried from the U.S.S.R. and other foreign ports, inbound, to U.S. ports during voyages - subsidized for the carriage of export bulk raw and processed agricultural commodities to the U.S.S.R.

Full details concerning the U.S.- U.S.S.R. export bulk raw and agricultural commodities subsidy program, including terms, conditions and restrictions upon both the subsidized operators and vessels, appear in Title 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 294.

NOTICESThe Agreement was approved by the

Maritime Subsidy Board (Board) on October 7, 1974 and presently includes the tankers SINCLAIR TEXAS, ARCO PRUDHOE BAY and ARCO ANCHORAGE. The Agreement will expire on December 31,1975, unless further extended. Each voyage under the Agreement must be approved for subsidy before commencement of the voyage. The Board will act on each request for a subsidized voyage as an administrative matter under the terms of the Agreement, for which there is no requirement for further notices under section 605(c) of the Act.

Any person having an interest in the granting of the application and who would contest a finding of the Board that the service now provided by vessels of U.S. registry for the carriage of cargoes as previously specified is inadequate, must on or before October 30,1975, notify the Board’s Secretary, in writing, of his interest and of his position, and file a petition for leave to intervene in accordance with the Board’s rules of practice and procedure (46 CFR Part 210). Each statement of interest and petition to intervene shall state whether a hearing is requested under section 605(c) of the Act and, with as much specificity as possible, the facts that the intervener would undertake to prove a t such hearing.

In the event a hearing under section 605(c) of the Act is ordered to be held with respect to the subject application, the purpose of such hearing will be to receive evidence relevant to (1) whether the application herein above described, with respect to the vessels to be operated in an essential service and served by citizens of the U.S., would be in addition to the existing service, or services, and if so, whether the service already provided by vessels of U.S. registry is inadequate, and (2) whether in the accomplishment of the purposes and policy of the Act additional vessels should be operated thereon.

If no request for a hearing and petition for leave to intervene is received within the specified time, or if the Board determines that petitions for leave to intervene filed within the specified time do not demonstrate sufficient interest to warrant a hearing, the Board will take such action as may be deemed appropriate.(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 11.504 Operating-Differential Subsidies (ODS))

By order of the Maritime Subsidy Board, Maritime Administration.

James S. Dawson, Jr., Secretary.

[PR Doc.75-28886 Piled 10-23-75;8:45 am]

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NORTHWEST FISHERIES CENTERReceipt of Application for Endangered

Species Permit— E9Notice is hereby given that the follow

ing applicant has applied in due formFEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER

for a permit to take and import endangered species for scientific purposes as authorized by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) and the National Marine Fisheries Service Regulations Governing Endangered Fish or Wildlife Permits (50 CFR 222) .as published in the November 27, 1974 F ederal R egister at page 41375.

Northwest Fisheries Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, 2725 Montlake Boulevard, East, Seattle, Washington 98112, to take and import specimen materials from dead endangered species

—of cetaceans. These cetaceans are as follows:Gray Whale, Eschrichtius robustus Blue Whale, Balaennvtera musculus Humpback Whale, Megaptera novaengliae Bowhead Whale, Balaena mysticetus Right Whale, Eubalaena australis Pin Whale, Balaenoptera vhysalus Sei Whale, Balaenoptera borealis Sperm Whale, Physeter catodon

The specimen materials will be taken from cetaceans which become available to U.S. observers, in the course of their duties in observing the commercial whaling activities of other nations. Such observers, placed aboard commercial whaling factorvshins or at land whaling stations, either by appointment hy, the International Whaling Commission (IWC) or by invitation of the nation conducting the whaling activitv, will be designated as agents of the Apolicant for the purposes stated in the application. At present, two IWC anpointed U.S. observers have been placed at Jananese land whaling stations, and one U.S. observer has been invited aboard an Antarctic factorvship bv Japan.

The specimen materials will be taken from cetaceans which are: (1) Directly taken in fisheries fof such animals, in countries and situations where such taking is legal; (2) killed incidental to fishing or other operations; or (3) dead of natural causes. In no case will agents of the Applicant kill, or cause to be killed, any endangered species in connection with collecting the requested specimen materials. Initially, the specimen materials will be collected bv agents o£ the Applicant located at Japanese land whaling stations, and aboard a Japanese whaling factorvship. Additional agents may be designated as opportunities for observers expand to include other whaling activities.

The materials to be collected will include reproductive organs, ear plugs, teeth, bone, baleen and muscle tissue, and blood samples whenever possible. These materials wifi be analvzed to obtain data on reproductive capacity, age, distribution, and population stock identification and movepient.

In connection with this proposed research, the Applicant has applied for a permit under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, to take and import specimen materials from these species as well as specimen materials from non-endangered cetaceans subject to that legislation. ~ .

Documents submitted in connection with the above application are available for review in the Division of Marine

24, 1975

NOTICES 49813

Mammals and Endangered Species, National Marine Fisheries Service, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20235, and the Office of the Regional Director, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Region, Lake Union Building, 1700 Westlake Avenue, North, Seattle,Washington 98109.

Interested parties may submit written data or views, or requests for a public hearing on this application to the Director, National Marine Fisheries Service, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20235, within 30 days of the publication of this notice. The holding of such hearing is at the discretion of the Director. ,

Any statements and opinions that may be contained in this notice in support of this application are summaries based on those of the Applicant and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Mariñe Fisheries ¡Service.

Dated: October 17,1975.R obert W. S choning,

Director,National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc.75-28670 FUed 10-23-75;8:45 am]


Food and Drug Administration{ [Docket No. 75N-0304]

UNIFORM PHYSICIAN LABELING FOR ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE DRUG PRODUCTS

Intent To Solicit Comments on Draft Labeling

Prior to issuing in the F ederal Regis"- ter proposed new regulations relating to uniform physician labeling for oral, contraceptive drug products, the Commissioner of Food and Drugs is soliciting comments on a draft revision erf the labeling. Interested persons have until on or before November 24,1975 to submit comments.

The Food and Drug Administration is charged with assuring both physicians and patients that drugs are safe and effective for their intended uses. The full disclosure of information to physicians concerning such matters as effectiveness, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse reactions is an important element in the discharge of this responsibility. Accordingly, the Commissioner is in the process of revising the -uniform physician labeling for oral contraceptive drug products to update the current labeling for these drug products, which was last revised in November 1969, to include significant new information. The patient labeling for the oral contraceptives is also undergoing major revision. However, since its wording is partially dependent upon the physician’s labeling, the Commissioner is awaiting comments on the latter before publishing the proposed revised patient labeling.

To ensure maximum public participation in the development of the regulation, the Commissioner is proposing to distribute a draft revision of such labeling to various professional, scientific,

trade, and consumer organizations and to solicit comments on it. A copy of that draft revision has also been placed on public display in the office of the Hearing Clerk, Food and Drug Administration, Rm. 4-65, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, and will be available for public inspection in the above office Monday through Friday, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., except Federal legal holidays. Copies of the draft revised labeling are available upon request from the Hearing Clerk.

Interested persons may, on or before November 24, 1975, submit written comments regarding the revised labeling to the Hearing Clerk. Comments should be filed in quintuplicate (except individuals may submit single copies) and should be identified with the Hearing Clerk docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the above office at the times stated above.

Dated: October 21,1975.S am D. Fine,

Associate Commissioner for Compliance.

{FB Doc.75-28783 Filed-10-23-75;8:45 am]

Health Resources AdministrationNATIONAL COUNCIL ON HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Chartering; CorrectionIn FR Doc. 75-27101 appearing at page

47531 in the issue for Thursday, October 9, 1975, the title should read "National Council on Health Planning and Development” rather than “National Advisory Council on Health Planning and Development” and the section designated as “Purpose” should be changed to read as follows:

Purpose: The Council will advise, consult with, and make recommendations to the Secretary with respect to (I) the development of national guidelines concerning health planning policy, (2) the implementation and administration of Title XV, National Health Planning and Development, and Title XVI, Health Resources Development, and (3) an evaluation of the implications of new medical technology for organizations, delivery, and equitable distribution of health care services.

Dated: October 16, 1975.James A. Walsh,

Associate Administrator for Operations and Management,

, Health Resources Administration.

[FR Doc.75-28667 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

Health Services AdministrationNATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ON

HEALTH MANPOWER SHORTAGE AREAS, Meeting

In accordance with sectoin 10(a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made

of the following National Advisory body scheduled to assemble during the month of November 1975:Name: National Advisory Council on Health

Manpower Shortage areas.Date and Time: November 21, 1975, 9:00 a.m. Place: Room 7-23, Parklawn Building, 5600

Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20852. Open for entire session.

Purpose: The Council is charged with establishing guidelines and regulations to improve the delivery of health care services; assigning Public Health Service personnel to areas where medical manpower and facilities are inadequate to meet the health needs of persons living in such areas; and on a nationwide basis recommending the criteria and personnel on which selection of areas are based.

Agenda: Orientation of new Council members to the operation of the National Health Service Corps. A discussion of emerging activities in rural health, the implications of pending legislation, and an explanation of provision of recent legislation.

The meeting is open to the public for observation and participation. Anyone wishing to obtain a roster or other relevant information should contact Howard Hilton, Room 6-05, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Telephone (301) 443-4437.

Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

Dated: October 16,1975.W illiam H. Aspden, Jr.,

Acting Associate Administrator for Management.

[FR Doc.75-28666 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

National Institutes of HealthNATIONAL ARTHRITIS, METABOLISM, AND DIGESTIVE DISEASES ADVISORY COUNCIL

MeetingsPursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is

hereby given of the meeting of the National Arthritis, Metabolism, and Digestive Diseases Advisory Council, National Institute of Arthritis, Metabolism, and Digestive Diseases on November 19-21, 1975; from 9 a.m. to 5 pjm. on November 19 in Building 31, Conference Room 4; and from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on November 20-21 in Building 31, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, Maryland. This meeting will be open to the public from 9 am . to 1 p.m. on November 19,1975, to discuss administrative reports. Attendance by the public will be limited to space available. In addition, a meeting of the Digestive Diseases Committee of the above Council will be held from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. on November 19, 1975, in Building 31, Room 9A51, Bethesda, Maryland.

In accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552(b)(4), 552(b)(5) and 552(b)(6), Title 5, U.S. Code and section 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463. the meeting of the Council will be closed to the public on November 19 from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. and on November 20-21, 1975, from 9 am. to 5 p.m., for the review, discussion


49814and evaluation of individual initial pending, supplemental and renewal grant applications. The Digestive Diseases Committee of the above Council will be closed to tiie public from 2 pm . to 5 p.m. on November 19, 1975, also for the review, discussion and evaluation of individual initial, pending, supplemental and renewal grant applications. The closed portions of the meetings involve solely the internal expression of views and judgments of committee members on individual grant applications containing detailed research protocols, designs, and other technical information; financial data; such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the applications.

Messrs. James N. Fordham or Leo E. Treacÿ, Office of Scientific and Technical Reports, NIAMDD, National Institutes o f Health, Building 31, Room 9A04, Bethesda, Maryland 20014, (301) 496- 3583, will provide summaries of the meeting and rosters of the committee members.(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 13.309, National Institutes of Health)

Dated: October 20,1975.Suzanne L. F remeau,

Committee Management Officer, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc.75-28690 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

PRESIDENT'S CANCER PANEL Meeting

Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting of the President’s Cancer-Panel, National Cancer Institute, December 2, 1975, 9:30 a.m. to adjournment, National institutes of Health, Building 31, Conference Room 9. This meeting will be open to the public from 9:30 a.m. to 12 noon for a report from the Director, National Cancer Institute, and a report from the Chairman, President’s Cancer Panel. Attendance by the public will be limited to space available. The meeting will be closed to the public from 1:30 pjn. to adjournment for review and discussion of the proposed fiscal year 1977 budget in accordance with the provisions set forth in‘ section 552(b) (5) of Title 5 U.S. Code and 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463.

Dr. Richard A. Tjalma, Executive Secretary, Building 31, Room 11A46, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20014 (301/496-5854) will provide substantive program information, transcripts of the open meeting and roster of committee members.

Dated: October 17,1975.S uzanne L. F remeau,

Committee Management Officer, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc.75-28689 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 tun]

NOTICESOffice of the Secretary

POLL OF PHYSICIANS 'N PSRO AREA XII;FLORIDA

Announcement of ResultsOn May 14, 1975, the Secretary of the

Department of Health, Education, and Welfare published in the Federal Register a notice in which he announced his intention to enter into an agreement with the Dade-Monroe Professional Standards Review Organization, Inc., designating it as the Professional Standards Review Organization for PSRO Area XII located in the State of Florida, which area is designated a Professional Standards Review Organization Area in 42 CFR 101.12.

Such notice was also published"® three consecutive issues of the “Miami Herald,” “Homestead South Dade News-Leader,” and the “Miami Beach Sun-Reporter” on May 14, 15, and 16, 1975. In addition, copies of the notice were mailed to organizations of practicing doctors of medicine or osteopathy, including the appropriate State and county medical and specialty societies, hospitals, and other health care facilities in the area, with a request that each such society or facility Inform those doctors in its membership or on its staff who are engaged in active practice in PSRO Area XII of the contents of the notice.

The notice requested that any licensed doctor of medicine or osteopathy engaged in active practice in PSRO Area XU who objects to the Secretary entering into an agreement with the Dade-Monroe Professional Standards Review Organization, Inc., on the grounds that such organization is not representative of doctors in PSRO Area x n , mail such objection in writing to the Director, Office of Professional Standards Review, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, P.O. Box 1588, FDR Station, New York, New York 10022, on or before June 13, 1975.

After reviewing the final tabulation of objections from doctors of medicine or osteopathy in PSRO Area XII, the Secretary has determined, pursuant to 42 CFR 101.105, that more than 10 percentum of the doctors engaged in the active practice of medicine or osteopathy in PSRO Area x n have expressed timely objection to entering into an agreement with the Dade-Monroe Professional Standards Review Organization, Inc.

Therefore, on July 31,1975, in accordance with 42 CFR 101.106, the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare published in the F ederal R egister a notice announcing a poll to be conducted of all doctors of medicine or osteopathy engaged in active practice in PSRO Area xn to determine whether the Dade-Monroe Professional Standards Review Organization, Inc., is representative of such doctors in the area.

Such notice was also published in the “Miami Herald,” “Homestead South Dade News-Leader,” and the “Miami Beach Sun-Reporter” on July 31,1975. In

addition, copies of the notice were mailed to organizations of practicing doctors of medicine or osteopathy, including the appropriate State and county medical specialty societies, hospitals, and other health care facilities in the area, with a request that each such society or facility inform those doctors in its membership or on its staff who are engaged in active practice in PSRO Area XII of the contents of the notice.^

The notice stated that a ballot was to be mailed to each such doctor on which he was to indicate whether in his opinion the Dade-Monroe Professional Standards Review Organization, Inc., was or was not representative of the doctors of medicine or osteopathy engaged in active practice in PSRO Area XU. The notice also requested that any licensed doctor of medicine or osteopathy engaged in active practice in PSRO Area XII who had not received a ballot by August 4,1975, might request in writing a ballot from the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, P.O. Box 1588, FDR Station, New York, New York 10022. According to the notice, only those ballots postmarked no later than August 30,1975, and returned in the stamped self-addressed envelope provided to each individual doctor would be considered valid.

A ballot and envelope together with a letter of explanation was mailed to each individual doctor of medicine or osteopathy whom the Secretary determined, pursuant to 42 CFR 101.103, to be engaged in the active practice of medicine or osteopathy in the PSRO area.

The counting of the ballots took place in a proceeding open to the public a t the Mayor’s Conference Room, Dade County Courthouse, 73 West Flagler Street, Miami, Florida on September 8, 1975.

After tabulating the ballots received under 42 CFR 101.106, the Secretary has determined, pursuant to 42 CFR 101.107, that more than 50 percent of the doctors responding to the poll indicated by checking the appropriate box on the ballot, that tiie Dade-Monroe Professional Standards Review Organization, Inc., was representative of the doctors in the area. Therefore, the Secretary intends to enter into an agreement designating the Dade-Monroe Professional Standards Review Organization, Inc., as the conditional Professional Standards Review Organization for such area.

This count will be final except that the Secretary will conduct a recount if at least five doctors in the area so request in writing, postmarked on or before November 3, 1975. Such recount will be conducted in a public proceeding and the result of the recount will be final.

Dated: October 14, 1975.R obert van H oek,

Acting Administrator, Health Services Administration.

[FR Doc.75-28671 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 am]


NOTICES 49815Office of the Assistant Secretary for HealthPROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS OF

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH NATIONAL COMMISSION

MeetingNotice is hereby given that the Na

tional Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research will meet on November 15, 1975 in the West Ballroom at Weber’s Inn, 3050' Jackson Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103. The meeting will convene a t 9 a.m. and will be open to the public, subject to the limitation of available space.

On November 14,1975, the Commission will make a site visit to the State Prison of Southern Michigan in Jackson, Michigan. The Commission will not hold a meeting during the site visit, which will be conducted in a manner to avoid interference with prison security. Discussion of the site visit and other matters identified in the legislative mandate to the Commission under Pub. L. 93-348 will be included in the agenda for the public meeting on November 15.

Requests for information should be directed to Ms. Anne Ballard (301) 496- 7776, Room 125, Westwood Building, 5833 Westbard Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20016.

Dated: October 16,1975.Charles U. Lowe,

Executive Director, National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.

[PR Doc.75—28662 Piled 10-23-75;8:45 am]

Office of Education .NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ON EX

TENSION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION

Closed MeetingNotice is hereby given, pursuant to Sec.

10 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act Pub. L. 92-463 and Sec. 8.d. of Office of Management and Budget Circular A-63 that a closed meeting of the Executive Committee of the National Advisory Council on Extension and Continuing Education will be held on November 5-6, 1975, in the Council’s office, 425 13th St., N.W., Suite 529, Washington, D.C.

The National Advisory Council on Extension and Continuing Education is authorized under Sec. 109(a) of the Higher Education Act, under Public Law 89-329, as amended (20 USC 1009). The Council « directed to advise the Commissioner of Education in the preparation of general regulations and with respect to policy matters arising in the administration of Title I of the Higher Education Act, and to report annually to the President and to the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare on the administration and effectiveness of all federally sppported extension and continuing education programs, including community service programs.

This meeting of the Executive Committee of the Council will not be open to the public. The purpose of the meeting will be to review applications for the position of Executive Director to the Council. At this meeting matters will be discussed and documents will be produced (for example recommendations and references) which1 if released to the public would amount to a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Such documents need not be released to the public under exemption 6 of the exemptions from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, Sec. 552(b) (6) of Title 5 USC. This meeting may, therefore, be closed to the public under Sec. 10(d) of.the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Records of Council proceedings are available for public inspection a t the Council’s office located at the address given above.

Lloyd H. Davis, Executive Director.

October 21, 1975.IFR Doc.75-28755 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]


National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. KX74—2; Notice 3] CARROZZERIA ZAGATO

. Petition for Temporary Exemption FromMotor Vehicle Safety Standards

Carrozzeria Zagato of Milan, Italy, through Elcar Corporation of Elkhart, Indiana, has applied for a 1-year extension of the temporary exemption granted its Elcar passenger car from certain safety standards on grounds that exemption would facilitate the development and field evaluation of a low-emission motor vehicle. The company has previously applied for (39 FR 25969) and received (39 FR 32774) a 1-year exemption from Motor Vehicle Safety Standards Nos. 103, 114, 206, and 208.

Elcar is a corporation engaged in the importation and marketing of an electrically-powered two-passenger vehicle manufactured by Zagato. The vehicle, currently sold abroad as the “Zele,” is marketed under the name “Elcar” in the United States. Elcar requests an extension for one year only and does not intend to import more than 2,500 vehicles during this time.

The extension that it requests would allow it to continue to manufacture vehicles without defrosting/defogging systems (Standard No. 103), key-lock warning systems (Standard No, 114), and conforming door latches and hinges (Standard No. 206). The year provided by the exemption would allow further time for design and tooling of nonstandard components necessary for lightweight electric vehicles. The Elcar cannot comply currently with Standard No. 103 as presently available electric defrosting systems are unsuitable, and SAE test procedures incorporated in Standard

No. 103 require idling, a physical impossibility for electric vehicles. Concerning Standard No. 114, the design of its “key insertion area is not compatible to facilitate additional electric circuits capable of accommodating an alarm system at this time.” Its problems with Standard. No. 206 stem from the fact that the hinge load requirements specified are in its opinion more appropriate for heavier weight vehicles.

The company’s arguments that one- year exemptions will not unreasonably degrade the safety of the vehicle may be summarized as follows: Standard No. 103: The sliding windows in the doors will alleviate fogging conditions and Elcar anticipates major market areas for the cars in the Southern, Western, and Southwestern states “that do not require defrosting and heater systems.” Standard No. 114: The steering wheel lock requirement of the standard is met, and “it is practically impossible to short circuit the entirely-closed encasements containing the circulatory system for starting.” Standard No. 2^6 : The vehicle has such a low top speed (25 mph for one model, 35 mph for another) that it is less likely that impacts will occur such as could throw occupants from the vehicle. Further, the hinges have steel reinforcements embedded in the fiberglass body structure.

This notice of receipt of a petition for temporary exemption is published in accordance with the NHTSA regulations on this subject (49 CFR 555.7), and does not represent any agency decision or other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.

Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition of Carrozzeria Zagato, described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be submitted to: Docket Section, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Room 5108, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20590. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.

All comments received before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated below will be considered. The application and supporting materials and all comments received, are available for examination in the docket both before and after the closing date. Comments received after the closing date will also be filed and will be considered to the extent possible. Notice of action on the petition will be published in the F ederal R egister pursuant to the authority indicated below.

Comment closing date: November 24 1975.(Sec. 3, Pub. L. 92-548, 86 Stat. 1159 (15 UJ3.C. 1410), delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.51 and 49 CFR 501.8).

Issued on October 17, 1975.Andrew G. D etrick,

Acting Associate Administrator,Motor Vehicle Programs.

[FR Doc.75-28739 Filed 10-23-75;8:46 am]


49816 N OTICES

CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD[Order 75-10-87; Docket 26494; Agreement G.AJB. 25435, Rr-1 through R-6; 25436; 25451, R -l and R-2; 25452, R -l through R-3]

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION

Agreements Relating to Passenger Fares;Order

Issued under delegated-authority October 21,1975.

Agreements have been filed with the Board pursuant to section 412(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (the Act) and Part 261 of the Board’s Economic Regulations between various air carriers, foreign air carriers, and other carriers embodied in the resolutions of Traffic Conference 2 of the International Air Transport Association (IATA). The agreements were adopted a t the 61st Meeting of Traffic Conference 2 held in Geneva during September 1975.

The agreements propose general increases in passenger fares between South

Accordingly, it is ordered, That:1, Those portions of Agreements C.A.B.

25435, C.AJB. 25436, CA.B. 25451 andC.A.B. 25452 described in finding paragraph 1 above, which have indirect application in air transportation as defined by the Act, be and hereby are approved; and

2. Jurisdiction be and hereby is disclaimed with respect to that portion of Agreements C.A.B. 25435 and C-A.B. 25452 described in finding paragraph 2 above.

Persons entitled to petition the Board for review of this order pursuant to the Board’s Regulations, 14 CFR 385.50, may file such petitions within ten days after the date of service of this order.

This order shall be effective and become the action of the Civil Aeronautics Board upon expiration of the above period, unless within such period a petition

Africa and South West Africa, on the one hand, and Israel, on the other hand, and between points in the Middle East and points in Africa;- and would amend other fares, conditions of travel and currency-related surcharges for transportation within Traffic Conferences (Europe/ Africa/Middle East). We will approve those portions of the agreements governing fares which are combinable with fares to/from United States points and thus have indirect application in air transportation as defined by the Act, but will disclaim jurisdiction with respect to fares which are not similarly combinable.

Pursuant to authority duly delegated by the Board in the Board’s Regulations 14 CFR 385.14:

1. It is not found that the following resolutions, incorporated in agreements indicated, and which have indirect ap-r plication in air transportation as defined by the Act, are adverse to the public interest or in violation of the Act:

for review thereof is filed fir the Board gives notice that it will review this order on its own motion.

This Order will be published in the Federal R egister.

[ seal] Edwin Z. H olland,Secretary.

[FR Doc.75-28698 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM THE BUND AND OTHER SEVERELY HANDICAPPED

PROCUREMENT LIST 1975 Additions to Procurement List

Notice of proposed additions to Pro-, curement List 1975, November 12, 1974 (39 FR 3996,4) were published in the F ederal R egister on July 25,1975 (40 FR

31255) and August 8,1975 (40 FR 33484), Pursuant to the above notices the fol

lowing commodities are added to the Procurement List:Class 6505 PriceThimerosal Tincture, NF

(SH) 6505-00-664-6911 $0. 74 pg. of 10.Iodine Ampoules, NF (SH)

GSOS-fiO—664—1408 _____ 0..73 pg. of 10.Class 7220 Mat, Floor (SH)

7220-00-205-3192 __ 2. 67 each.7220-00-205-3182 _____ 5. 72 each.By the Committee.

C. W. Fletcher, Executive Director.

[FR Doc.75-28672 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

PROCUREMENT LIST 1975 Noticé of Proposed Additions

Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 2(a) (2) of Pub. L. 92-28; 85 Stat. 79, of the proposed addition of the following commodities to Procurement List 1975, November 12, 1974 (39 FR 39964),Class 3990

Skids, Pallets, and Caps, Wood 3990-00-366-6810 3990-00-366-6814 3990-00-366-6815 3990-00-366-6816 3990-00-366-6817 3990-00-366-6819 3990-00-366-6820 3990-00-366-6821 3990-00-366-6824

Class 6532Cap, Operating, Surgical

6532-00-250-5041 6532-00-088-6545

Comments and views regarding these proposed additions may be filed with the Committee not later than 30 days after the date of this F ederal Register. Communications should be addressed to the Executive Director, Committee for Purchase from the Blind and Other Severely Handicapped, 3009 Fourteenth Street North, Suite 610, Arlington, Virginia 22201.

This notice is automatically cancelled six months from the daté of this F édérai R egister.

By the Committee.C. W. Fletcher,

Executive Director.[FR Doc.75-28673 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS Availability

Environmental impact statements received by the Council on Environmental Quality from October 13 through October 17, 1975. The date of receipt for each statement is noted in the statement summary. Under Council Guidelines the minimum period for public review and cömment on draft environmental impact statements in forty-five (45) days from

AgreementCAB

LATANo.

T ide Application

25435:R -l ___ 022d

R -2 .. .___ 022qq

25436...........___ 003c125451:

R - l____ ___ 052 sR-2 ___ 062 2

25452:R - l .........___ 003b1R-2.........___ 022dd

TC2 (Except Within Europe) Special Buies tor Sales of Passenger Air Transportation (Amending) (Expedited).

TC2 (Within Europe) Special Rules tor Sales of Passenger Air Transportation (Amending) (Expedited).

General Increase m Passenger Fares (New)___ .___________ _____ i___. . .

TC 2 First Class Fares (Amending) ( E x p e d i t e d ) . . — ;i | TC2 Economy Class Fares (Amending) (Expedited)_____________«.___

Generai Increase In Passenger Fares ( N e w ) . . .___ ________________ . . . . .TG2 (Except Within Europe) Special Rules tor Sales of Passenger Air

Transportation (Amending) (Expedited).

i Middle East-Africa.¡Within Europe.

2. I t is npt fouhd that the following resolutions, incorporated in agreements indicated, affect air transportation within the meaning of the Act:

AgreementCAB

LATANo.

Title Application

26435:R -3 ............... - 072g TC2 Creative Fares Board (Europe) (Amending) (E x p ed ited ) ..... . : 2R-4....... . . 075h TC2 Group Fares—Benelux/Europe (Amending) (Expedited)......... ............ 2R-5.............. . 091d TC2 Family Fares United Kingdom-Ireland (Revalidating and Amend- 2

R -6 ... .......... . 091k• ing) (Expedited).

225452:

R - 3 . . . ........ - 072g TC2 Creative Fares Board—Europe (Amending) (Expedited)__________ 2


NOTICES 49817■this Federal R egister notice of avail- lability. (December 8, 1975) The thirty 1(30) day period for each final statement I begins on the day the statement is made ( available to the Council and to comment- ling parties.

Copies of individual statements are [available for review from the originating [agency. Back copies will also be available at cost from the Environmental Law [institute, 1346 Connecticut Avenue, [ Washington, D.C. 20036.

Department op Agriculture

I Contact: Dr. Fowden G. Maxwell, Co- [ordinator of Environmental Quality Activities, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department

[ of Agriculture, Boom 359-A, Washington, D.C. 20250,202-447-3965.

FOREST SERVICEI Draft

Council Unit, Payette National Forest, Adams and Washington Counties, Idaho,

; October 14: The statement concerns the land use plan for the 138,862 acre Council Planning Unit of the Payette National Forest. The plan sets forth management objectives and priorities, and allocates land to resource uses and activities. Adverse effects will be from temporary stream siltation due to resource utilization, short periods of air pollution caused by planned burning, and minor intrusions into an inventoried roadless area. (ELR Order No. 51518.)

Upper Lewis R. Unit, Gifford-Pinchot National Forest, Skamania County, Wash., October 14: The statement concerns the land use plan for the Uu^er Lewis River Planning Unit of the Gifford-Pinchot National Forest. The plan allots 2,840 acres within the unit for classification as a Scenic Area, 2,460 acres to wilderness study, 1,150 acres near the north boundary as unroaded area, 4,500 acres for wildlife habitat, 190 aeres for recreation developments, and 72,676 acres on which the main activity will be timber harvests. Physical and biological impacts will be caused by additional people on the area, and logging will disturb the biological systems. (ELR Order No. 51517.)Final , J

Cascade Planning Unit, Boise National Forest, Valley County, Idaho, October 17: The statement concerns the land use plan for the 136,468-acre Cascade Planning Unit of the Boise National Forest. The plan sets forth the allocation of land to various resource uses and activities, establishes objectives, documents management direction, decisions, and necessary coordination between resource uses. Impacts relative to all possible uses or non-use within the unit include effects on vegetation soils, esthetic values, wildlife, water, and recreational values. Comments made by: DOI, EPA, DOT, USD A, AHP, and State and local organizations and individuals. (ELR Order No. 51537.)

rural electrification administration Final

Tombigbee Units 2 and 3, in several counties in Ala., October 17: The statement refers to the request for insured and guaranteed loan funds from REA for $265,553,000 to construct Alabama Electric Cooperative’s addition of two 238MW (gross output) coalflred steam generator units and approximately 157 miles of 230 kV transmission lines and acquire related coal leases. Adverse impacts include soil erosion and visual intrusion from the transmission facilities and effects associated with burning ooal. Comments made by: EPA, USDA, COE, DOT, FEA, DOI, and State agencies. (ELR Order No. 51533.)

SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICEDraft. Great Creek Watershed Project, Brunswick and Lunenburg Counties, Va., October 14: Proposed is a project for watershed protection, flood prevention, and municipal and industrial water storage In Brunswick and Lunenburg Counties, Virginia. A 57-foot high earth fill dam will be built to store water, trap sediment, and reduce flooding downstream. -The project will inundate 212 acres and restrict land use on 430 acres of forest land, cropland, and pastureland. Approximately 4.8 miles of perennial stream and 2.1 miles of intermittent stream will be inundated. (ELR Order No. 51520.)Final

Little Black Watersheds, several counties in Mo. and Ark., October 15: The statement concerns two interrelated projects for watershed protection, flood prevention, drainage on agricultural land, and recreation for 40,254 acres in Butler, Carter, and Ripley Counties, Missouri, and Clay County, Arkansas. Construction of the 24 floodwater retarding structures and the multiple-purpose reservoir will remove 1,192 acres of forest land, 334 acres of cropland, and 52 acres of pastureland. Proposed channel modification will result in the loss of 20S acres of cropland and 570 acres of forest land and the gain of 718 acres of pastureland. (125 pages). Comments made by: COE, HEW, DOI, DOT, EPA, AHP, and State and local agencies. (ELR Order No. 51524.)

Zuni Pueblo Watershed Project, McKinley County, N. Mex., October 14: The statement concerns a project for watershed protection and flood prevention for 11,700 acres of the Zuni Pueblo Watershed. About 652 acres of land would be needed for construction of 60' x 7,000' earth dam, spillway, an emergency spillway, and operation of the system. Eleven archeological sites would be committed to mitigation salvage and excavation. Comments made by: COE, DOI, DOT, EPA, AHP, and State agencies. (ELR Order No. 51521.)

Department of Defense

ARMY CORPSContact: Dr. C. Grant Ash, Office of En

vironmental Policy Development, Attn: DAEN-CWR-P, Office of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, D.C. 20314, 202-693-6795.Draft

Arkansas R., North Little Rock, Pulaski County, Ark., October 14: The statement concerns a project for. flood protection for the downtown area of North Little Rock, Arkansas. The selected plan consists of approximately 3.6 miles of excavated channel, 9,000 feet of renovated existing channels, and 9,- 800 feet of new channel. The project, with a fence erected on both sides of the channel, will require about 70 acres of right-of-way. Adverse impacts of the project include the loss of 1,315 acres of poor quality wildlife habitat, a decline in aesthetics, relocation of

, businesses, and the possible spread of Histo- plasma spores as secondary development occurs. (Little Rock District.) (ELR Order No. 51514.)

Big South Fork National River, Ky., Tenn., October 14: Proposed is the establishment, administration, and maintenance of the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Tennessee and Kentucky, as authorized by PJj. 93-251. The project will displace 295 persons and families from 13 active cemeteries, and will require the acquisition of 61

■farms, loss of significant timber harvest, loss

of coal, gas, and oil production, revenue losses, and disturbance of the area due to increased tourist use. (Nashville District.) (ELR Order No. 61522.)Final■ Sacramento River, Major and Minor Tributaries, Several Counties in Calif., October 14: The project involves the protection of extensive areas in the Sacramento River Basin flood plains from widespread damages and loss of life due to flooding. Loss of wildlife and associated natural riparian values along the streams cannot be avoided at some sites. (Sacramento River.) Comments made by: EPA, DOI, HEW, USDA, DOT, and State and local agencies. (ELR Order No. 51516.)

Maintenance Dredging, Mich., Several Counties in Mich., October 16: Proposed is the maintenance dredging of 14 unpolluted harbors: Charlevoix, Frankfurt, GrandHaven, Holland, Leland, Little Lake, Luding- ton, Manistee, Muskegon, Pentwater, St. Joseph, Saugatuck, South Haven, and White Lake. The impact will be limited to temporary construction disruption. Comments made by: HEW, DOT, FPC, USDA, HUD, DOI, DOC, EPA, AHP, and State agencies. (ELR Order No. 51628.)

Sheboygan Harbor Maintenance Dredging, Sheboygan County, Wis., October 16: Proposed is the maintenance dredging of the Sheboygan Harbor to maintain project depths. Also included in the project is the construction of a diked disposal confinement area in Lake Michigan for disposal of the dredged materials over the next ten year period. Adverse impacts include the disturbance of bottom dwelling organisms, the resuspension of toxic materials, the conversion of 14.8 acres of aquatic environment to a terrestrial environment, and creation of potential health and safety hazards. (Chicago District.) Comments made by. (ELR Order No. 51527.)

General Services Administration

Contact: Mr. Andrew E. Kauders, Executive Director of Environmental Affairs, General Services Administration, 18th and F Streets, NW., Washington, D.C. 20405, 202- 343-4161.Draft

Government Printing Office Relocation, District of Columbia, October 17: The action consists of the construction of a new printing plant, documents warehouse and distribution facility, and administrative center for the Government Printing Office (GPO). The new 33 acre site is located at Brentwood Road and T Street in Northeast Washington, D.C. The new plant would provide for the consolidation of GPO functions now operating separately around the Metropolitan area. Impacts of the project Include the Increase in traffic in the area which is already operating at over peak volume capacity, and the vacating of the existing GPO office buildings. (ELR Order No. 51538.)

Metallurgy Research Center, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, October 14: The proposed action is the construction of a new Metallurgy Research Center for the Bureau of Mines, Department of Interior. The Center will replace the current building in Salt Lake City and will provide for over 125 employees.'The project will require the commitment of 34 acres of land and will have an impact upon the cultural and historic resources of the area. (ELR Order No. 51512.)Final

Removal of Hill 733, Marine Corps Air Station, El Toro, Orange County, Calif., October 16: Proposed is the disposal of 2.5 million cu. yds. of fill earth from Hill 733 of U.S. Marine Corps Air Station, El Toro (Santa


49818 NOTICESAna), California. At present the upper portion of Hill 733 penetrates the approach and assent flight patterns from the east-west runways at the Air Station. The operation may take from 8.5 to 17 years depending upon the rate of removal. Slight temporary increases of air and noise pollution near the site will result. Comments made by: DOI, HEW, EPA, AHP, DOT, USDA, COE.

Department of HUDContact: Mr. Richard H. Broun, Director,

Office of Environmental Quality, Room 7258, 451 7th Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20410, 202-755-6308.Final

Wilton Development New Castle County, New Castle County, Del., October 14: Wilton involves the residential development of a 370 acre tract of land over an approximately ten year period. Development will include construction of 3,000 dwelling units and community centers. Land is being reserved for development of public open space and school areas. Plans also 'call for development of a commercial area fronting on Route 40. Adverse impacts of the plan include: conversion of agricultural land to urban use, some increase in air pollution and community noise levels, and some traffic congestion. Comments made^by: EPA, DOI, DOT, HEW, and State and local agencies. (ELR Order No. 51519.)

Section 104 (h ).The following are Community Develop

ment Block Grant statements prepared and circulated directly by applicants pursuant to section 104(h) of the 1974 Housing and Community Development Act. Copies may be obtained from the office of the appropriate local chief executive. (Copies are not available from HUD).Draft

Boston Demolition Plan, Mass., October 15: The action, under the Community Development Block Grant Program is to demolish 900 buildings over two years. The purpose of the program is to remove fire and health hazards from seven areas of Boston: Rox- bury, Dorchester, Jamaica Plain, South Boston, Franklin Field, Upham’s Corner, and Mattapan. Adverse impacts of the project include traffic congestion at demolition sites, an increase in large-particle dust at demolition sites and an increase in ambient noise levels. (ELR Order No. 51525.)

Water Line Extension, Marshall County Marshall County, Tenn., October 15: The project is the construction of a 9.3 mile long water line extension in Marshall County, Tennessee. The service area encompasses approximately 3,945 acres and 250 people. Construction 'of the line will require the disruption of Springplace Road (F.A.S. 4329) in four places and the crossing of existing fence rows and private driveways. (ELR Order No. 51526.)

'Department of the Interior

Contact: Mr. Bruce Blanchard, Director, Environmental Project Review, Room 7260, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240, 202-343-3891.Final

Wolf Creek National Fish Hatchery, Russell County, Ky., October 17: Proposed is the construction and operation of a national fish hatchery below Wolf Creek Dam, for the propagation of rainbow trout. Adverse impact will include the discharge of hatchery waste water to the Cumberland River, with resultant organic enrichment of river water. (87 pages.) Comments made by: COE, EPA, HEW, DOI, and State agency. (ELR Order No. 51536.)

NATZONAL PARK SERVICEFinal

White Sands National Monument, Otero County, N. Mex., October 17: The statement concerns the master plan for the White Sands National Monument for the next five years, which is based on general and specific mandates of Congress and NPS policies. A co-use permit with the Secretary of the Army has allowed missUe Impact and recovery in the western portion of the monument, thus precluding a wilderness designation. Construction of roads and visitor facilities in the outlying area will change the area from its present natural state.' Comments made by: DOI, DOD, EPA. (ELR Order No. 51535.)

Department of Labor

DraftCoke Oven Emissions, October 17 : The Oc

cupational Safety and Health Administration proposes to regulate employee exposure to respirable particulate above a limit of 0.3 m g/m ». The proposal also provides for protective equipment and clothing, training, medical surveillance, and recordkeeping. The statement indicates no significant impacts on the environment external to the workplace, but lack of hard data prevents OSHA from quantifying the full extent of any type of environmental impact. (ELR Order No. 51539.)

National Science F oundation

Contact: Dr. Thomas O. Jones, Deputy Assistant to the Director, National and International Programs, Room 703, Washington, D.C. 20550, 202-632-4180.Final

International Phase of Ocean Drilling, October 16: Proposed is the support of the International Phase of Ocean Drilling of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, scheduled to begin late fall of 1975 as part of the National Science Foundation’s Ocean Sediment Coring Program. The exploratory drilling would be performed in relatively few sites but to substantially greater depths than before. Areas with known reservoirs of hydrocarbons will be avoided. The possible release of major fluxes of natural fluids is the only event which could have a profund negative environmental impact. Comments made by: EPA, USA, DOI. (ELR Order No. 51531.)

Department of Transportation

Contact: Mr. Martin Convisser, Director, Office of Environmental Affairs, 400 7th Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20590, 202- 426-4357.

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

DraftClark*Co. Airport, Jeffersonville, Ind., Clark

County, Ind., October 16: The statement concerns the acquisition of 619 acres of land and a new airport for Clark County. The project will include the construction of a runway, entrance road and vehicle parking, administration building, airplane hangars and aprons, navigation and landing aids, and site improvements. The statement includes a description of construction in four phases, the last of which will end in 1998. Adverse Impacts of the project include the loss of 600 acres to other uses, increased noise pollution, relocation of 6 households and increased air pollution. (ELR Order No. 51530.)

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

DraftAppalachian Highway in North Ga„ Sev

eral Counties in Ga., October 14: The state

ment provides five alternative routes for the j construction of SR 400, the Appalachian Highway, from the Forsyth/Dawson County ] line to the North Carolina State line. Dis- i tances range from 58.7 miles to 72.2 miles long. All alternatives propose the construction of a 4-lane divided facility, and all will require blasting, relocation of families and businesses, and the crossing of streams and rivers within the corridor. (ELR Order No. ■ 51523.) -Final

Northwest County Highway, Shelby County, Tenn., October 14: The proposed project involves the construction of North-- west County. Highway between MilUngton and Arlington in north Shelby County, Tennessee. The project length is approximately 18 miles. Adverse impacts include the displacement of residences and businesses, loss of farmland and wildlife habitat, increased air and noise pollution, and temporary soil erosion and siltation during construction. Comments made by: DOI, DOC, EPA, HUD, USDA, TVA, COE, HEW, and State and local agencies. (ELR Order No. 51515.)

1-295, Richmond, Chesterfield, Hanover, and Henrico Va., October 17: Proposed is the construction of a 37.4 mile segment of the circumferential route around Richmond, Virginia. Route 295 has its southern terminus near Proctors Creek on Route 1/301, south of Richmond, and extends to the east and north of Richmond to terminate at an interchange with proposed Route 288 and 1-64. The project will require, the displacement of 14 businesses and 96 families and will cross the Hoke Brady Road, a part of the Richmond National Battlefield Tour Route and the site of Union communications trenches. A 4(f) statement is included. Comments made by: (ELR Order No. 51634.)

State Trunk Highway 21, Juneau County, Juneau County, Wis., October 16: The statement refers to the proposed reconstruction and resurfacing of State Trunk Highway 21 in Juneau County. The project begins at the Juneau-Monroe County line and -extends easterly 15.11 miles through the village ot Necedah to the Wisconsin River. The“ westerly 9.56 miles involve reconstruction of the existing roadway and the easterly 5.55 miles involve resurfacing. The project will require acquisition of approximately 90 acres from private individuals and from the U.S. Government. (26 pages.) Comments made by: DOT, EPA, DOI, and State agencies. (ELB Order No. 51532.)

U .S. COAST GUARDFinal

LORAN-C Chain, West Coast/Gulf of Alaska, October 14: The proposed action provides for the establishment of a new LORAN-C radio-navigation chain along the US West Coast and in the Gulf of Alaska. Stations will be located in Searchlight and Fallon, Nevada: Middletown, California; Moses Lake, Washington;, Ketchikan (Shoal Cove), Tok, Sitki- nak, Alaska, and at an as-yet undefined location-in southwestern Canada. This eis concerns only the non-Alaska stations. There will be some visual impact at all stations due to the height of the towers; adverse impact may occur in especially scenic areas. Comments made by: DOD, DOC, DOI, AHP, EPA, USCG, USDA, COE, and State and local agencies and individuals. (ELR Order No. 51513.)

Gary L. Widman, General Counsel.

^ [FR Doc.75-28648 Filed 16-28-75;8:45 am]


NOTICES 49819

FAA, CG, UMTA, AND HUD; ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS .

List Actions Needing Environmental Impact Statements

The following list, filed with the Council by the Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, United States Coast Guard, and Urban Mass Transit Administration, and by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, indicates those administrative actions that PAA, USCG, UMTA, and HUD have determined will require the preparation of environmental impact statements under NEPA.

Listing of DOT/Federal Aviation 'Administration Actions for which Environmental Impact Statements are in preparation or anticipated.Anchorage, AL, New Runway.Cedar Rapids, I A, Airport Layout Plan and

Land Acquisition.Pocoihontas, IA, Airport Layout Plan and

Land Acquisition.York, NE, Master Plan and Airport Layout

Plan.Onawa, IA, Airport Layout Plan.LamaT, MO, Master Plan and Airport Layout

Plan.Omaha, NE, Airport Layout Plan.North Platte, NE, Airport Layout Plan and

Airport Development. - Lamoni, IA, Airport Layout Plan.Washington, KS, Master Plan and Airport

Layout Plan.Lee’s Summit, MO, Airport Development.Blair, NE, Master Plan and Airport Layout .v Plan.Hillsboro/Marion, KS, Master Plan and Air

port Layout Plan.Hoxie, KS, Master Plan and Airport Layout

Plan. >/•/. ^ ■■Marshalltown, IA, Airport Layout Plan and

Airport Development.Springfield, MO, Master Plan.LeMars, IA, Master Plan and Airport Layout

Plan. -Atwood, KS, Master Plan and Airport Layout

Plan.Jefferson City, MO, Airport Development. Storm Lake, IA, Airport Development. Pittsburg, KS, Airport Development.Albany, MO, Airport Development.Sac City, IA, Airport Development.Joplin, MO, Airport Development.Eldon, MO, Airport Development.Scott City, KS, Airport Development.Pontiac, Oakland-Pontiac, MI, Land Acqui

sition Extend Runway.Ironwood County, MI, Land, Acquisition New

Runway.Hillsdale Municipal, - MI, 20 Year Planning

Grant Program (PGP).Mt. Pleasant Municipal, Ml, Land Acquisi- . tion Extend Runway.Saginaw (Tri-City Apt.), MI, Land Acquisi

tion Extend Two Runways.Escanaba County, MI, Land Acquisition Ex

tend Runway.Menominee County, MI, New Runway. Lansing-Capital City, MI, 20 Year Planning

Grant Program (PGP).Grand Ledge Municipal, MI, 20 yeanPlanning

Grant Program (PGP)1:Ann Arbor Municipal, MI, 20 Year Planning

Grant Program (PGP).Kalamazoo Municipal, MI, Extend Runway. Flint-Bishop, MI, Land Acquisition New Run

way. IGrand Rapids County, MI, Extend Runway. Coldwater Municipal, MI, 20 Year Planning

Grant Program (PGP).Greenville Municipal, MI, 20 Year Planning

Grant Program (PGP).

Saginaw Harry Browne, M I, 20 Year Planning Grant Program (PGP). *

Aurora Municipal, IL, 20 Year planning Grant Program (PGP).

Bloomington Normal, IL, 20 Year Planning Grant Program (PGP).

Carbondale Southern, IL, 20 Year Planning Grant Program (PGP).

Champaign Willard, IL, 20 Year Planning Grant Program (PGP).

Decatur Municipal, IL, 20 Year Planning Grant Program (PGP).

Effingham County, IL, Land Acquisition ILS Runway.

Havana Municipal, IL, New Airport-20 Year Planning Grant Program (PGP).

Rockford Greater, IL, 20 Year Planning Grant Program (PGP). -

Effingham County, IL, Land Acquisition New Runway.

Akron-Canton Municipal, OH, Extend Runway.

Cleveland Cleveland-Hop., OH, New Runway Extend Runway.

Cleveland Cuyahoga, OH, New Runway.Anderson Municipal, IN, Cross-Wind Runway

Extension.Angola Tri-State, IN, New Airport-20 Year

Planning Grant Program (PGP).Crawfordsville Municipal, IN, New Airport-

20 Year Planning Grant Program (PGP).Ft. Wayne Municipal, IN, 20 Year Planning

Grant Program (PGP).French Lick Municipal, IN, Runway Exten

sion.Gary Municipal, IN, 20 Year Planning Grant

Program (PGP).Greencastle County, IN, New Airport-20 Year

Planning Grant Program (PGP).Huntingburg Municipal, IN, 20 Year Plan

ning Grant Program (PGP).Mt. Vernon Municipal, IN, New Airport-20

Year Planning Grant Program (PGP).North Vernon Municipal, IN, New Alrport-20

Year Planning Grant Program (PGP).Shelbyville Muncipal, IN, 20 Year Planning

Grant Program (PGP).Wabash Municipal, IN, 20 Year Planning

Grant Program (PGP).Jeffersonville Clark County, IN, New Airport-

20 Year Planning Grant Program (PGP).Green Bay Austin Straubel, WI, Land Ac

quisition Improve Runway.Madison County, WI, Land Acquisition Clear

Runway Approach.Antigo County, WI, Land Acquisition Extend

Runway.Waupaca Municipal, WI, Land Acquisition

Install VASI.Rhineland County, WI, Construct CFR

Building.Baudette International, VMN, Land Acquisi

tion Runway Extension.Madison Dawsen-Madison, MN, New Runway.Tower Municipal, MN, New Runway.Fergus Falls Municipal, MN, Land Acquisi

tion. .Walker Municipal, MN, Land Acquisition

New Runway.Jackson, Municipal, MN, Land Acquisition

Runway Extension.Elmira, NY, Runway Extension.Newburgh, NY, Runway Extension.St. Marys, PA, Runway Extension.Erie, PA, Runway Extension.Allentown, PA, Runway-Extension.Clarksburgh, WV, Runway Extension.New Martinsville, WV, New Airport.Buckhannan, WV, New Airport.Lewisburg, WV, Runway Extension.Ocean City, MD, New Runway.Chestertown, MD, New Airport.Calvert County, MD, New Airport.Clinton, VA, Runway Extension.Southhill, VA, New Airport.Franklin, VA, Runway Extension.Roanoke, VA, Runway Extension.

Williamsburg, VA, New Airport.Gloucester, VA, Airport Expansion.Stafford County, VA, New Airport.New Haven, CT, Runway Extension.Rumford, ME, New Airport.Provincetown, MA, Runway Extension.Lopez, WA, Land Acquisition New Runway.Neah Bay, WA, New Airport Site.Richland, WA, New Runway Land Acquisi

tion.Woodland, WA, New Airport Site.Colville, WA, New Airport Site.Ocean Shores, WA, New Airport Site.Pasco, WA, Runway Extension Land Acquisi

tion.Elma, WA, New Airport Site.Everett, WA, New GA Runway.Vancouver, WA, New Airport Site.Eugene (Table Top), OR, Establish ARSR.North Bend, OR, Runway Extensions.La Grande, OR, Runway Extension.Hermiston, OR, Land Acquisition Runway

Extension.Medford, OR, Land Acquisition.Warm Springs, OR, New Airport Site.Portland-Clackamas, OR, New Airport Site.St. Maries, ID, Land Acquisition.Kamiah, ID, Runway Extension.Soda Springs, ID, New Runway Land Acqui

sition.Yap AirpOrt, Yap District, Trust Territory of

the Pacific Islands, Develop Airport Master Plan.

Kusaie Island, Truk Territory of the Pacific Islands, Develop Airport Master Plan.

Babelthuap/Koror Island, Palau District, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, Develop Airport Master Plan.

Agana, Guam, Mariana Islands, Develop Airport Master Plan for General Airport.

Honolulu, Hawaii, Develop Airport Master Plan for General Aviation Airport.

Lihue, Kauai, Hawaii, Develop Airport Master Plan.

Agana, Guam, Mariana Islands, Transfer of Section 23 (U.S. Navy) land.

Alabaster, AL, Extend both ends of Runway 15/33.

Charleston, SC, Construct New General Aviation Runway.

Gibertsville, KY, Extend Runway.Miami, FL (In ti) , Extend Runway 09R.Miami, FL, Construct New Air Carrier Airport.Morristown, TN, Construct New General Avi

ation Airport.Nashville, TN, Construct New Airport.Raleigh-Durham, NC, Construct New Air

Carrier Runway.St. Thomas, VI, Construct New Runway.Ft. Myers, FL, Construct New Air Carrier Air

port.Tulsa, OK, Provide Additional Instrumenta

tion.Richardson, TX, New Airport.Lake Jackson, TX, Airport Master Plan.Baton Rouge, LA, Airport Master Plan.Gonzales, LA, New Airport.Hollywood-Burbank, CA, Acquire Existing

Airport.La Verne, CA, New Runway.Los Angeles (Whiteman), CA, Land Acquisi

tion and New Runway.Los Angeles, (Int’l) , CA, Airport Develop

ment.Oakland, (Int’l) , CA; New Runway.Palmdale, (Inti) , CA, New Airport.Reedly, CA, New Airport.Santa Ana (Orange County), CA, Airport

Extension.San Francisco (Int’l ) , CA, Airport Expansion.Ontario, CA, New Runway.

FAA OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY RULEMAKING PROJECTS

Civil Helicopter Noise Certification Standards.


49820 NOTICESCivil Airplane Fleet Noise Requirements.Modification of FAA FAR 36 Appendix C.Civil Supersonic Aircraft Noise Type Cer

tification Standards.Concorde Supersonic Transport Aircraft.The following projects were previously

announced as requiring an environmental impact statement but have been found to be adequately covered by a negative declaration.Aspen, CO, Master Plan.Colorado Springs, CO, Master Plan.Durongo, CO, Master Plan.Logan, UT, Master Plan.Salt Lake City, TJT, New Runway.Casper, WI, Master Plan.Riverton, WI, Master Plan.

Civil Propeller Driven Large STOL Aircraft Noise Certification Standards.

Noise Abatement Operating Procedure Requirements—Departure.

Listing of DOT/United States Coast Guard Actions for which Environmental Impact Statements are in preparation or anticipated.

F—Proposed changes to the Coast Guard Station New London, CT.

F—Proposed regulations for Vessels in Domestic trade.

F—Deepwater Port Regulations.D—Proposed Coast Guard Search and Res

cue Station, Cockspur Island, GA.F—Proposed Loran (C) Chain—Gulf Coast

(final to CEQ 15JUL75).D—Proposed Multi-Purpose Facility at

Berwick, LA.D—-Proposed Rules for Vessel Traffic Sys

tem, Berwick Bay, LA.F—Proposed Vessel Traffic System, Hous-

ton/Galveston, TX.D—Proposed Loran (C) Station, Seneca

Army Depot, NY.F—Proposed Loran (C) Chain, U. S. West

Coast/Gulf of Alaska.D—Point Reyes Housing Sewage Disposal

Plan, CA.D—Proposed bridge across Shallotte Creek,

Brunswick County, NC.F—Proposed ramps for the downtown ex

pressway to the 1—95 highway bridge across the James River in Richmond, VA.

F—Proposed replacement of the Dumbarton Bridge across San Francisco Bay, San Mateo and Alameda Counties, CA.

D /4(F)—Proposed Route U. S. 22 Highway Bridge across the Ohio River between Wier- ton, WV and Steubenville, OH.

D—Proposed reconstruction Main Street Bridge and Sixth Street Bridge across Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH.

D—Proposed Highway Bridge across the Wisconsin River in Wassau, WI.

F—Proposed Highway Bridge across the Wolf River in Fremont, WI.

F—proposed Highway Bridge across Station Creek for access to a planned residential development on St. Phillip Island in Beaufort County, SC.

D—Proposed 78th Ave. Bridge across Gulf Intercoastal Waterway in Seminole Beach, FL.

D—Proposed James Point Bridge across the St. John River In Jacksonville, FL.

D—Proposed Coast Guard Station at Prov- incetown, MA.

F—Proposed Route 18 Highway Bridge across the Raritan River in New Brunswick, NJ.

D—Proposed Calhoun St. Bridge across Delaware River between Morrisville, PA and Trenton, NJ.

D—Proposed Merrick Rd„ Bridge across Seaford Creek in Mineola, NY.

D—Proposed Highway - Bridge across Cal- caieu Lake in Cameron Parish, LA.

D—Proposed Highway Bridge across Hog Bayou near Grand Chenier, Cameron Parish, LA.

D—Proposed vehicular/mass transit bridge across the Mississippi River at New Orleans, LA.

D—West Bank Expressway, U.S. Route Highway 90 Business Route, Upgrading of an existing segment to freeway standards including a high level bridge over the Harvy Canal. Proposed upgrading would extend from U.S. Highway 90 on the west to the (Orleans Parish line on the east, a distance of 9.78 miles New Orleans, LA.Negative Declarations Prepared and F iled

in Coast Guard Headquarters During the Second Quarter of CY 1975Purchase ten (10) units of family, housing

in Ocean View Township, Sussex County, DE, for Indian River Inlet Coast Guard Station.

Installation of underwater power cables to Smith Point and Wolf Trap Lighthouses in the Chesapeake Bay, VA.

Renovation of Traverse City Air Station, Traverse City, MI. -

New Coast Guard Seasonal Support Facility, Santa Cruz, CA.

Additions to Coast Guard Base, Mayport, FL.

Consolidation of Coast Guard Units at Pier 36/37 Seattle, WA.

Proposed disposal of 1.08 acres of land at Laupahoehoe Point, Island County, HI.

Industrial waste control at Elizabeth City Air Base, NC.

Negative Declarations for F inal Bridge Permit Actions

project, waterway, location, permit no .Budd Inlet, Puget Sound, Olympia, Washing

ton, 96-74.Piscataqua River, Portsmouth, New Hamp

shire, 139-74.Chimenticook Stream, Aroostook County,

Maine, 145-74. •Mississippi River (Upper), Prairie DuChien

& Marquette, Iowa, 254-68.Mystec River, Somerville & Medford, Massa

chusetts, 18-75.Pine Island Bayou, Beaumont, Texas, 195-69. Mohongahela River, Morgantown, West Vir

ginia, 19-75.Onancock Creek, Onancock, Virginia, 20-75. Ohio River; Moundsville, West Virginia, 21-

75.Guyandotte River, Juntington, West Virginia,

22-75.Mahoning River, Youngstown, Ohio, 23-75. Mermentua River, Lake Arthur, Louisiana,

65-69.Shakett Creek, Nokomis, Florida, 27-75.Ohio River, Parkersburg, West Virginia, 28-

75.Polk Drive Canal, Sarasota County, Florida,

31-75. *Collins Canal, Miami Beach, Florida, 198-69. Wateree River, Wateree, South Carolina, 32-

75.New York Barge Canal, Monroe County, New

York, 33-75.Houston Creek, Chatham County, Georgia,

34-75.Randolph Slough, Bandon, Oregon, 37-75. Earman River, North Palm Beach, Florida,

40-75.Middle River, San Joaquin County, Califor

nia, 42—75.Ribault River, Duval County, Florida, 43-75. Loxahatchee River (North Fork), Tequesta,

Florida, 51-75.New River (North Fork), Fort Lauderdale,

Florida, 53-75.Vardell Creek, Charleston, South Carolina,

54-75.Cocheco River, Dover, New Hampshire, 44-75. Bowlees Creek, Manatee, Florida, 36-75.

GIWW, Houma, Louisiana, 66-68.Mascoma River, Lebanon, New Hampshire

26-75.Foxi River, Kaukauna, Wisconsin, 144-74. California Sluiceway, Imperial Dam, Califor

nia, 80-75.Colorado River, Yuma, Arizona, 135-72. Arizona Sluiceway, Imperial Dam, Arizona

82-75.Point Remove Creek, Morrilton, Arkansas

74-75.Bonanza Channel, Nome, Alaska, 67-75.Knob Creek, Arcot, Tennessee, 68-75.Ocean Canal (Biscayne Bay), Miami Beach,

Florida, 146-74.Coosa River, Mims Ferry, Alabama, 62-75. Yachats River, Yachats, Oregon, 63-75. Wisconsin River, Tomahawk, Wisconsin,

64-75.Pine River, St. Clair, Michigan, 55-74.Wax Lake Outlet, Calumet, Louisiana, 65-75. Unnamed Channels (tributaries of Gulf of

Mexico), Bayport, Florida, 169-70.Sampit River, Georgetown, South Carolina,

113-74.Collins Canal, Dade County, Florida, 58-75. Toms River, Ocean County, Dover, New

Jersey, 156-74.Buffalo Bayou, Houston, Texas, 46-75.Eureka Slough, Eureka, California, 38-75.

Listing of DOT/Urban Mass Transportation Administration Actions for Which Environmental Impact Statements Are In Preparation Or Anticipated.

1. Supplemental EIS on changes to MARTA East-West line, Atlanta, Georgia.

2. Final EIS on Fifth and Sixth Avenues Transit Mall, Portland, Oregon.

3. Draft EIS on South Quincy Station Area, Massachusetts.

4. Draft and Final EIS on D.C. Bicentennial Transportation Program, Washington, D.C.

5. Draft EIS on Extension to Shady Grove, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Wash., D.C.

Listing of HUD Actions, for which Environmental Impact Statements are in preparation or anticipated.Austin, Texas, Development of Colony Park,

Section 1, Phase 4-A, and Colony Park Hills, Section 1-B.

Palm Beach County, Florida, Cannoqgate Planned Unit Development Project.

Gary L. W idman, General Counsel.

[FR Doc.75-28649 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION[Report No. 776]

COMMON CARRIER SERVICES INFORMATION 1

Re: Domestic Public Radio Services Applications Accepted for Filing2

October 20, 1975.Pursuant to §§ 1.227(b)(3) and 21.30

Ob) of the Commission’s rules, an appli-

1A11 applications listed in the appendix below are subject to further consideration and review and may be returned and/or dismissed if not found to be in accordance with the Commission’s rules, regulations and other requirements.

aThe above alternative cut-off rules apply to those applications listed in the appendix as having been accepted in Domestic Public Land Mobile Radio, Rjural Radio, Point-to- Point Microwave Radio and Local Television Transmission Services (Part 21 of the Rules).


NOTICES 49821

cation, in order to be considered with any domestic public radio services application appearing on the attached list below, must be substantially complete and tendered for filing by whichever date is earlier: (a) The close of business one business day preceding the day on which the Commission takes action on the previously filed application; or (b) within 60 days after the date of the public notice listing the first prior filed application (with which subsequent applications are in conflict) as having been accepted for filing. An application which is subsequently amended by a major change will be considered to be a newly filed application. It is to be noted that the cut-off dates are set forth in the alternative- applications will be entitled to consideration with those listed in the appendix below if filed by the end of the 60 day period, only if the Commission has not acted upon the application by that time pursuant to the first alternative earlier date. The mutual exclusivity rights of a new application are governed by the earliest action with respect to any one of the earlier filed conflicting applications.

The attention of any party in interest desiring to file pleadings pursuant to section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, concerning any domestic public radio services application accepted for filing, is directed to § 21.27 of the Commission’s rules for provisions governing the time for filing and other requirements relating to such pleadings.

F e d e r a l C o m m u n ic a t io n s C o m m i s s i o n ,

V i n c e n t J . M u l l i n s ,Secretary.

Ap p l ic a t io n s Ac c e p t e d F o r F i l in g

DOMESTIC PUBLIC LAND MOBILE RApiO SERVICE

20291-CD-MP/L—75, Samuel W. Waldenberg (KUS355), Modification of CP and License to change frequency from 152.18 MHz to 152.06 MHz at Loc. #1: Blacktail Mtn., 12 miles S. of Kalispell (Flathead) Montana.

20598- CD-P-76, Airsignal of Nevada, Inc. (New), C. P. for a new 1-way Signaling station to operate on 35.22 MHz. to be located at Black Mtn., 6.5 miles SW of Henderson (Clark) Nevada.

20599- CD-TC-(5) —76, Chalfont Communications. Consent to Transfer of Control from Frank & Marie Chalfont, Transferor to Frank Chalfont, Mrs. Jeanne N. Beamesder- fer, Mrs. Julia A. Knupp, & Dan W. Chalfont, Transferees. Stations: KMD995 & KMM581, Palm Springs, California; KMA 251 & KLF520, El Centro. California; and KMM652, Beaumont, California.

20600- CD-TC-76, Pennsylvania Radio Telephone Corp. Consent to Transfer of Control from Leon R. Price, Transferor, to Robert L. Starer, Transferee. Station: KGA808, Top of Mt. Penn, Pennsylvania.

20601- CD-P-(3)-76, Empire Mobilcomm Systems, Inc. (KOK419), C.P. to replace transmitter operating on 454.300 MHz and for additional facilities to operate on 454.150 & 454.250 MHz located at 4.5 miles West of Salem, Oregon.

20602- CD-P-76, United Telephone Company of Indiana, Inc. (New), C. P. for a new 1- way station to operate on 158.10 MHz to be located approximately y2 mile South Southeast of Plymouth, Indiana.

20603- CD-P—76, United Telephone Company of Indiana, Inc. (New), C. P. for a new 1- way station to operate on 158.10 MHz to be located on State Road 25, y2 mile West of Warsaw, Indiana.

20604- CD-P—(2) —76, Pass Word, Inc. (EMM 697), Resubmitted a C. P. for additional facilities to operate on 454.250 & 454.300 MHz located 9.3 miles E. of Spokane, Mica Peak, Idaho.

20605- CD-P-76, C. P. for a new 2-way station to operate on 152.21 MHz to be located 0.95 miles East of Lamed, Kansas.

20606- CD-rP—76, South Shore Radio-Telephone, Inc. (KUD238), C. P. for additional facilities to operate on 454.075 MHz to be located at a new site described as Loc. #2: Hines Hospital, Maywood, UUnois.

20607- CD-P-76, Seaway Communications (KUS413), C. P. to relocate faculties operating on 35.58 MHz to be located at 21st Street & Central Avenue, Ship Bottom, New Jersey.

20608- CD-P—(2)—76, Public Communications, Inc. (KLB761); C. P. for additional facilities to operate on 152.09 & 152.15 MHz located off Highway #59, 2 miles South of Lufkin, Texas.

20609- CD-TC—(2)—76, Mobile Radio System of Ventura, Inc. Consent to Transfer of Control from Pacific Communications Corporation, Transferor, to Anna Markel, et al, Transferees. Stations: KSV976, Ventura, California & KMA835, Willis Canyon Peak, California.

20610- CD-TC—<2)—76, Mobile Radio System of San Jose, Inc. Consent to Transfer' of Control from Tel-Rad, Inc. Transferor, to Anna Markel, et al, Transferees. Stations: KQZ715 & KMA741, San Jose, California.

20611- CD—P—76, Michigan Bell Telephone Company (KQA812), C. P. to increase antenna height & correct coordinates operating on 152.151 MHz located at 5980 Wild- cast Road, 10 miles NW of Port Huron, Michigan.

20612- CD-P/L-76, Clifton Telephone Company (KLB579), Reinstatement of expired license operating on 152.69 MHz located on State Highway 215, 0.5 mile SE of Clifton, Texas.

Major amendment20559-CD-P-75, Chicago Communications

Service, Inc. Arlington Heights, Illinois. Amend to change the antenna to a Decibel Products, DB-406E with the maximum lobe of radiation at N. 315 degrees mounted such that the tip does not exceed 269.75 feet above ground level. All other particulars of operation remain as reported in PN #724 dated October 21, 1974.

RURAL RADIO SERVICE

60184-CR-TC-76, Mobile Radio System of San Jose, Inc. Consent to Transfer of Control from Tel-Rad, Inc., Transferor to Anna Markel, et al, Transferees. Station: KNK83, Temporary Fixed.

Correction60183-CR-TC-76, Imperial Communications

Corp. Consent to Transfer of Control from Bell & Howell Company, Transferor to General Communications Service, Inc., Transferee. Station: KOA42, Temporary Fixed. This entry was inadvertently omitted from PN #775 dated October 14, 1975. <

POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE:

1115-CF-P-76, Eastern Microwave, Inc. (KCK70), Mt. Grey lock 1, Massachusetts. Lat. 42°38'07" N., Long. 73°09'57" W. C.P. to correct station location to the foregoing coordinates; add 6049.0H MHz toward Beech Hill, New Hampshire and toward Florida Mtn., Massachusetts.

1120- CF—MP—76, American Television and Communications Corp. (WAU277) High Point, North Carolina. Lat. 35*59'00" N., Long. 80°03'41" W. C.P. to add 6226.9H MHz and 6286.2H MHz toward Salisbury, North Carolina.

1121- CF-P-76, Same. (New), Salisbury, North Carolina. Lat. 35°43'07" N., Long. 80°27'19" W. C.P. for a new station on 5960.0H MHz and 6078.6H MHz toward Concord, North Carolina.*

1122- CF-P-76 (New) , Concord, North Carolina. Lat. 35e24'28" N., Long. 80°39'05" W. C.P. for a new station on 6212.0V MHz and 6330.7V MHz toward Charlotte, North Carolina. ‘

1123- CF-MP-76, Yankee Microwave (KYZ 86), Moose Hill, 3.0 Miles East of Livermore Falls, Maine. Lat. 44*,29'00" N., Long. 70°07'59" W. C.P. to add 6167.6V MHz and 6019.3V MHz toward Jay, Maine.

1146-CF-P-76, Same. (New), Nashua, New Hampshire. Lat. 42°44'28" N., Long.71°27'15" W. C.P. for a new station on 11505.0H MHz toward Manchester, New Hampshire, on azimuth 3.8 degrees.[FR Doc.75-28681 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD[H.C. #203]

FIRST FINANCIAL OF VIRGINIA CORP.Notice of Receipt of Application for Permission To Acquire Control of

O c t o b e r 20, 1975.Notice is hereby given that the Federal

Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation has received an application from First Financial of Virginia Corp., McLean, Virginia, for approval of acquisition of control of the Augusta County Savings and Loan Association, Stuarts Draft, Virginia, an uninsured institution, under the provisions of Section 408(e) of the National Housing Act, as amended (12 UJS.C. 1730a(e)), and Section 584.4 of the Regulations for Savings and Loan Holding Companies, said acquisition to be effected by an exchange of the association’s capital stock for the capital stock of the applicant. The acquisition is contingent upon Augusta County Savings and Loan Association having its savings accounts insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. Comments on the proposed acquisition should be submitted to the Director, Holding Companies Section, Office of Examinations and Supervision, Federal Home Loan Bank Board, Washington,D.C. 20552, within 30 days of the date this notice appears in the F e d e r a l R e g i s t e r .

[ s e a l ] J. J. F i n n ,Secretary,

Federal Home Loan Bank Board.(FR Doc.75-28693 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION[Docket No. 75-40]

ACE MACHINERY CO. AND HAPAG-LLOYD AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

ErratumIn the notice of filing of complaint in

this proceeding served October 10, 1975

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY* OCTOBER 24, 1975

49822 NOTICESand published in the F e d e r a l R e g is t e r October 16, 1975 (46 FR 48549), the date on or before which hearing is ordered to commence should read April 10, 1976.

F r a n c is C . H u r n e y , Secretary.

[FR Doc.75-28736 Filed i0-23-75;8:45 am]

FEDERAI POWER COMMISSION[Docket Nos. RP75-91 and RP72-157; PGA

76-2; R&D 76-1]CONSOLIDATED GAS SUPPLY CORP.

Proposed Changes in FPC Gas Tariff O c t o b e r 8,1975.

Take notice that Consolidated Gas Supply Corporation (Consolidated) ? on September 30, 1975, tendered for filing Seventh Revised Sheet Nos. 8 and 9. These- tariff sheets are proposed to become effective November 1, 1975, subject to refund, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act in lieu of the rates filed April 16, 1975 in Docket No. RP75-91 which were suspended until November 1, 1975.

Consolidated states that the purpose of Seventh Revised Sheet Nos. 8 and 9 is (1) to reflect all changes in Consolidated’s pipeline purchased gas cost that will be in effect November 1, 1975; (2) to include in its rates a surcharge to reflect the unrecovered Purchased Gas Cost Account and flow through of supplier refunds; and, (3) to include a Research and Development cost adjustment.

The proposed revised tariff sheets reflect an annual decrease of $20.1 million in revenues from the revenues that would have been generated under the rates as originally filed April 16, 1975. The surcharge of 0.160/Mcf would be in effect November 1, 1975 through April 30, 1976. The R&D Cost Adjustment is 0.040/Mcf.

The rates contained in Seventh Revised Sheet Nos. 8 and 9 would generate $10.4 million over the rates contained in

Sixth Revised Sheet Nos. 8 and 9 filed September 2,1975 for effectiveness October 1, 1975.

Consolidated requests a waiver of any of the Commission’s Rules and Regulations as may be required to permit the proposed rates to become effective.

Copies of this filing were served upon Consolidated’s jurisdictional customers, as well as interested state commissions.

Any persons desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a petition to intervene or protest with the Federal Power Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 1.8 and 1.10 of the "Commission’s rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8, 1.10). All such petitions or protests should be filed on or before October 24, 1975. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make Protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a petition to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.

K e n n e t h F . P l u m b ,Secretary.

[FR Doc.75-28633 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 am]

[Docket Nos. RI76-39 and RI76-40]JURISDICTIONAL SALES OF NATURAL

GASOrder Providing for Hearing on and Sus

pension of Proposed Changes in Rates, and Allowing Rate Changes To Become Effective Subject to Refund1 and Dismissing as Unnecessary Certain Filings

O c t o b e r 15, 1975.Respondents have filed proposed

changes in rates and charges for juris-

1 Does not consolidate for hearing or dispose of the several matters herein.

Appendix A

dictional sales of natural gas, as set forth in Appendix A hereof.

The purposed changed rates and charges may be unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory, or preferential, or otherwise unlawful.

The Commission finds. I t is in the public interest and consistent with the Natural Gas Act that the Commission enter upon hearings regarding the lawfulness of the proposed changes, and that the supplements herein be suspended and their use be deferred as ordered below.

The Commission orders. (A) Under the Natural Gas Act, particularly sections 4 and 15, the regulations pertaining thereto [18 CFR, Chapter I], and the Commission’s rules of practice and procedure, public hearings shall be held concerning the lawfulness of the proposed changes.

(B) Pending hearings and decisions thereon, the rate supplements herein are suspended and their use deferred until date shown in the “Date Suspended Until” column. Each of these supplements shall become effective, subject to refund, as of the expiration of the suspension period without any further action by the Respondent or by the Commission. Each Respondent shall comply with the refunding procedure required by the Natural-Gas Act and § 154.102 of the regulations thereunder.

(C) Unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, neither the suspended supplements, nor the rate schedules sought to be altered, shall be changed until disposition of these proceedings or expiration of the suspension period, whichever is earlier.

By the Commission.[ s e a l ] K e n n e t h F . P i u m b ,

Secretary.

Rate inR ate Sap- Amount D ate Effective D ate Cents per Mcf* effect sub-

Docket Respondent sched- pie- Purchaser and producing area oi filing date suspended --------*----------------------- Ject toNo. ule m ent annual tendered unless until— Rate in Proposed refund in

No. No. increase suspended effect increased docketrate Nos.

RI76-39.... William C. Russell________ 2 123

*24 :

E l Paso Natural Gas Co., (New Mexico) (Rocky Mountain);

$34,087

18,00014,000

9-15-75 ■

9-15-75*25 ; 9-18-75 — . . . .

RI76-40.... R & G Drilling Co.,-Inc.™ ____d o -.............................—

*3 _ 9-15-75 . •— —- __!•5 .. - —d o - . ............... - ................— .. 9-15-75 .¿gasar..__:

(«) 56.8167

3-16-76 48.03-19-76 46.75<T) *65.0(<) 56.8167

73.86

63.0 RI74-53. 60.75

*71.5073.86

♦Unless otherwise stated, the pressure base is 15.025 lbffn’a.'* Applicable to wells spudded on or after Jan. 1,1973.* Applicable to the Oraham No. 53 welL* Applicable to the Marron No. 46 well.* Filing being dismissed as unnecessary because applicant’s small producer certifi

cate provides all the authorization needed to collect the proposed rate w ithout filing a notice of change.

* Sale being m d e pursuant to a contract dated Ju ly 29, 1975, which replaced the basio Dec. 11,1951, contract which expired Ju ly 1,1973;

• Sale being made pursuant to a contract dated Mar. 24, 1972, which replaced the basic Jan . 30,1954, contract which expired in lido 1974;~ * Russell is filing to cover his wells only which are covered by R . & Q.’s rate schedules.

• The pressure base is 14.73 Ib/in’a;• Accepted as of the date of filing since the proposed ra te is in conformity with

opinion No. 742.


NOTICES 49823

R & G’s proposed rate increases under its PPC Gas Bate Schedule Nos. 3 and 5 are dismissed as unnecessary since Its small producer certificate provides all the authorization necessary for B & G to collect the contract rates without the necessity of making filings.

W ith the exception of Bussell’s proposed ra te filing under Supp. No. 23 to his PPC Gas Bäte Schedule No. 2, which is accepted for filing since it is in conformity with Opinion No. 742, Bussell’s proposed rate increases are suspended for five months since they exceed the applicable area ceiling rate established in Opinion No. 658.

[PR Doc.75—28537 Fifed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

ADVISORY PANEL FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

Open MeetingIn accordance with the Federal Ad

visory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

Name. Advisory Panel for Computer Science and Engineering.

Date. November 11 and 12,1975.Time. 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. each day.Place. Bm. 321, National Science Founda

tion, 1800 G Street, NW. Washington, D.C.Type of meeting. Open.Contact Person. Dr. Kent K. Curtis, Head,

Computer Science Section, Bm. 339, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. 20550, telephone (202 ) 632-7346.

Summary minutes. May be obtained from the Committee Management Coordination Staff, Management Analysis Office Bm. 248, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. 20550.

Purpose of Advisory Panel. To provide advice and counsel concerning the status and new directions of computer science and engineering research.

November 11Agenda r -9:00 ami. Introduction9:30 a.m. Beview: Software and Program

ming Systems Program. Software Quality Be- search Program.

November 129:00 a.m. Overview of NSF Programs in

Computer Science.10:30 a.m. Continuation of Beview of

Software and Programming. Systems Program and Software Quality Research Program.'

1:30 pm . NSF Reorganization.2:30 p.m. Further discussion of agenda

items.Gail A. McH enry,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

October 21, 1975.[FR Doc.75-28636 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

INTERNATIONAL DECADE OF OCEAN EXPLORATION PROPOSAL REVIEW PANEL

MeetingIn accordance with the Federal Advi

sory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

Name. International Decade of Ocean Exploration Proposal Review Panel.

Date. November 11 through 13, 1975.Time. 8:30 a.m. each day.Place. Rm. 643, National Science Founda

tion, 1800 G Street, NW., Washington, D.C.Type of Meeting. Closed.Contact Person. Mr. Feenan D. Jennings,

Head, Office for the International Decade of Ocean Exploration, Rm. 1214, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. 20550, telephone (202 ) 632-7356.

Purpose of Panel. To provide advice and recommendations concerning support of research by programs of the Office for the International Decade of Ocean Exploration.

Agenda. Beview and evaluate research proposals.

Reason for Closing. The proposals being reviewed contain information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are within the exemptions of 5 U.S.C.— 552(b), (4), (5), and (6).

Authority to close meeting. The determination made on February 21, 1975, by the Director of the National Science Foundation pursuant to provisions of section 10(d) of Pub. I>. 92-463.

Gail A- McH enry,Acting Committee

Management Officer.October 21,1975.

[FR Doc.75-28635 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-443, 50-444]-PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW

HAMPSHIRE, ET AL., (SEABROOK STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2)

Reconstitution of BoardDaniel M. Head, Esq., was Chairman

of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board for the above proceeding. Mr. Head is resigning from the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel and therefore is unable to continue his service on this Board.

Accordingly, John M. Frysiak, Esq., whose address is Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, is appointed. Chairman of this Board. Reconstitution of the Board in this manner is in accordance with the Rules of Practice of the Commission.

Dated fit Bethesda, Md., this 22d day of October 1975.

James R.. Yore, - Acting Chairman, Atomic Safety

•and Licensing Board Panel.[FRDoc.75-28772 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Docket Nos. 50-460, 50-513]WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY

SYSTEM, (WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NOS. 1 AND 4)

Reconstitution of BoardDaniel M. Head, Esq., was Chairman

of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board for the above proceeding. Mr. Head is resigning from the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel and therefore is unable to continue his service on this Board.

Accordingly, Margaret M. Laurence, Esq., whose address is Laurence, Stokes & Neilan, 2001 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202, is appointed Chairman of this Board. Reconstitution of the Board in this manner is in accordance with the Rules of Practice of the Commission. * .

Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 22nd day of October 1975.

J ames R. Y ork,Acting Chairman, Atomic Safety

and Licensing Board Panel.[FB Doc.75-28773 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 am]

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION[Docket No, MC73-1]

MAIL CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE, 1973Formal Conference and Tentative

* Scheduling of HearingOctober 21, 1975.

Notice is hereby given that the Administrative Law Judge has scheduled'a formal conference on Tuesday, October 28, 1975, at 10:00 a.m., in the hearing room of the Postal Rate Commission, 2000 L Street, NW., Washington, D.C., to consider:

(1) The status of the settlement negotiations in Phase I; and.

(2) A progress report on Phase in.The parties are notified that the Com

mission has set a deadline of Wednesday, November 12,1975, for the submission of a Phase I settlement agreement to the Commission. If no such document is submitted, the hearing will resume on Monday, November 17, 1975, at 10 am., in the Postal Rate Commission hearing room.

J ames R. Lindsay,Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc.75-28782 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE RATES AND FEES

Proposed Changes Corrections

In FR Doc. 75-27021 appearing at page 47589 in the issue of Thursday, October 9, 1975, the following corrections are made:

1. On page 47590, in Table A-H, footnote 2 should read: “Under temporary rates the proposed exception in footnote 1 is applicable.”

2. On page 47593, in Table E-l, Proposed full rates:

(a) The pound rate category 67, zones 1 and 2, should read “$5.45” instead of “$5.54”.

(b) The second sentence of footnote 1 should be deleted.(39 U.S.C. 401)

R oger P. Craig, Deputy General Counsel.

[FB Doc.75-28637 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY,'OCTOBER 24, 1975

49824 NOTICESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION[Pile No. 500-1]

BBI, INC.Suspension of Trading

October 20, 1975.It appearing to the Securities and Ex

change Commission that the summary suspension of trading in the common stock of BBI, Inc. being traded otherwise than on a national securities exchange is required in the public interest and for the protection of investors;

Therefore, pursuant to section 12 (k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, trading in such securities otherwise than on a national securities exchange is suspended, for the period from October 21, 1975 through October 30,1975.

By the Commission.[seal] George A. F itzsimmons,

Secretary.[FR Doc.75-28684 Piled 10-23-75;8:45 am]

,4File No. 500-1]ROYAL PROPERTIES INC.

Suspension of TradingOctober 17, 1975.

It appearing to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the summary suspension of trading in the common stock of Royal Properties Incorporated being traded otherwise than on a national securities exchange is required in the public interest and for the protection of investors;

Therefore, pursuant to section 12 (k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, trading in such securities otherwise than on a national securities exchange is sus- pendedr for the period from October 20, 1975 through October 29,1975.



SEC REPORT COORDINATING GROUP (ADVISORY)

Public MeetingPursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the

Federal Advisory Coirimittee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, the Securities and Exchange Commission announces a public advisory committee meeting.

The Commission’s Report Coordinating Group (Advisory) will hold a meeting on November 17, 1975 at 55 Water Street, Twenty-third Floor, New York, New York. The meeting will commence at 10a.m. local time and will be for the purpose of discussing the development of the FOCUS Report of financial and operational information, simplified trading forms and assessment forms, and related topics.

The Group’s meetings are open to the public. Any interested person may attend and appear before or file statements with

the advisory committee. Said statements, if in written form, may be filed before or after the meeting. Oral statements shall be made at the time and in the manner permitted by the Report Coordinating Group.

The Report Coordinating Group was formed to assist the Coihmission in developing a coherent, industry-wide, coordinated reporting system. In carrying out this objective, the Report Coordinating Group is to review all reports, forms and similar materials required of broker- dealers by the Commission, the self-regulatory community and others. The Group is advising the Commission on such matters as eliminating unnecessary duplication in reporting, reducing reporting requirements where feasible, ahd developing the FOCUS Report of financial and operational information. (Securities Exchange Act Release No. 10612; Securities Exchange Act Release No. 10959; Securities Exchange Act Release No. 11140; Securities Exchange Act Release No. 11149.)

Information concerning the meeting, including the procedures for submitting statements to the Group, may be obtained by contacting; Mr. Daniel J . Pil- iero II, Secretary, SEC Report Coordinating Group Securities and Exchange Commisison, Washington, D.C. 20549,

[ seal] George A. F itzsimmons, Secretary.

October 17,1975.[PR Doc.75-28683 Piled 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Pile No. 24C-3585]SABER CORP.

Order Temporarily Suspending Exemption, Statement of Reasons Therefor, and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing

October 20, .1975.I. Saber Corporation (“Saber”) , a

Minnesota corporation organized on November 10, 1971, with offices located at 7324 36th Avenue North, Minneapolis Minnesota, filed with the Commission on April 11, 1973, a Form 1-A Notification with attached exhibits, including an offering circular for the purpose of obtaining an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Section 3(b) thereof and Regulation A thereunder relating to a proposed offering of 500,000 shares of common stock, 100 par value, at 500 per share, for ah aggregate amount of $250,-000. The offering commenced on July 5, 1973, and was completed on October 31,1973.

II. The Commission, on the basis of information reported by the staff, has reason to believe th a t:

A. The offering circular contains untrue statements of material facts necessary In order to make the statements made, in ligljt of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, particularly with respect to:

1. Failure to disclose that Saber was in default under its contract of purchase for the Breeze Campground;

2. Failure to disclose that no title other than a 10-year lease could be obtained from the State of Minnesota for 1200 feet of shoreline property.

3. Failure to disclose the existence of a $20,000 loan from the American National Bank of St. Paul, Minnesota, to Saber.

4. The filing of an application with the Minnesota Department of Health for a permit to operate one of its campgrounds.

B. The terms and conditions of Regulation A have not been met in the following respeets:

The offering circular was not amended to disclose the default on the Breeze Campground contract of purchase; and to disclose the $20,000 loan to the issuer.

C. The offering was made in violation of Section 17 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

III. I t appearing to the Commission that it is in the public interest and for the protection of investors that the exemption of the issuer under Regulation A be temporarily suspended,

It is Ordered, Pursuant to Rule 261(a) of the general rules and regulations under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, that the exemption of the issuer under Regulation A be, and hereby is, temporarily suspended;

It is further ordered, Pursuant to Rule 7 of the Commission’s rules of practice, that the issuer file an answer to the allegations contained in this order within thirty days of the entry thereof;

Notice is hereby given that any person having any interest in the matter may file with the Secretary of the Commission a written request for a hearing within thirty days after the entry of this order; that within twenty days after receipt of such request the Commission will, or at any time upon its own motion may, set the matter down for a hearing at a place to be designated by the Commission for the purpose of determining whether this order of suspension should be vacated or made permanent, without prejudice, however, to the consideration and presentation of additional matters at the hearing; and that notice of the time and place for the said hearing will be promptly given by the Commission. If no hearing is requested and none is ordered by the Commission, the order shall become permanent on the thirtieth day after its entry and shall remain in effect unless it is modified or vacated by the Commission.


Secretary.[FR Doc.75-28687 Piled 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[31-688]ST. REGIS PAPER CO.

Filing of Application for ExemptionNotice is hereby given that St. Regis

Paper Company, 150 East 42nd Street, Newv York, New York 10017, (“St.Regis”) , a holding company, has filed an application and an amendment thereto with this Commission for an exemption


NOTICES 49825

for itself and its two electric utility subsidiaries, North Western Pulp & Power Ltd. (“North Western”) and The Montana Light and Power Company ("Montana^ under sections 3(a) (3) and 3(a)(5) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (“Act”) and rule ^ promulgated thereunder as applicable to the proposed transaction. All interested persons are referred to the application, as amended, which is summarized below, for a complete statement of the proposed transaction.

St, Regis, a New York corporation, is. primarily engaged in the paper, pulp, and lumber industries and operations related to forest products through the ownership of 21 active subsidiary companies and other affiliated companies. Of these subsidiaries, only two, North Western and Montana, own and operate facilities used for the generation, transmission, or distribution of electric energy.

North Western, wholly-owned by St. Regis, was created under the laws of the Province of Alberta, Canada, and carries on an industrial business, the production and sale of bleached kraft pulp, the raw material from which kraft paper and board are made. All production is carried on at North Western’s mill located in Hinton, Alberta, Canada. A steam- electric generating plant that supplies the needs of the mill for both electric energy and process steam is situated adjacent to the mill. Under current operations, all the steam and virtually all the electric energy produced by the plant, which has no transmission facilities, are consumed by the mill. In 1974, North Western collected revenues of $57,802,369* from its industrial business. In 1973, North Western sold 10,000 KWH as an emergency backup to the utility that provides local electric service in Hinton for a total sales price of $150. In 1974, North Western made no sales of electric energy.

Montana, a wholly-owned Montana subsidiary of St. Regis; operates in Troy and Libby, Montana, providing the electric and steam energy for the parent’s facilities. Approximately two-thirds of Montana’s generation is purchased by the parent directly. Of the remaining one-third, onerhalf is sold directly to one regular industrial customer near Libby. The balance is distributed by Montana in the community of Troy, whose only substantial local enterprise is St. Regis. Surplus power sales are sold to Pacific Power & Light Company (“Pacific”) , the adjacent electric utility, under an interchange agreement. For the year 1974, the net energy available fpr sale by Montana was 49,032,020 KWH ($386,196.51) of which 37,710,420 KWH ($271,515.02) were purchased directly by St. Regis, 7,036,600 KWH ($107,172.62) were distributed in Troy and 4,285,000 KWH ($7,508.82) were sold as dump Power to Pacific.

It is stated that St. Regis is entitled to exemption since it does not engage in the public utility business and derives no material part of its Income from its public utility subsidiaries. I t is further

stated that North Western is not primarily a public utility company, and that its incidental occasional sales of surplus electric energy are covered by Rule 7.

The fees and expenses to be paid or incurred in connection with the proposed transaction are estimated at $750.00. It is stated that no state commission and no federal commission, other than this Commission, has jurisdiction over the proposed transaction.

Notice is further given that any interested person may, not later than November 11, 1975, request in writing that a hearing be held on such matter, stating the nature of his interest, the reasons for such request, and the issues of fact or law raised by said application, as amended, which he desires to controvert; or he may request th a t he be notified if the Com m ission should order a hearing thereon. Any such request should be addressed: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission/ Washington, D.C. 20549. A copy of such request should be served personally or by mail (air mail if the person being served is located more than 500 miles from the point of mailing) upon the applicant at the above- stated address, and proof of service (by affidavit or, in case of an attorney at law, by certificate) should be filed with the request. At any time after said date, the application, as amended or as it may be further amended, may be granted as provided in Rule 23 of the General Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Act, or the Commission may grant exemption from such rules as provided in Rules 20(a) and 100 thereof or take such other action as it may deem appropriate. Persons who request a hearing or advice as to whether a hearing is ordered will receive any notices and orders issued in this matter, Including the date of the hearing (if ordered) and any postponements thereof.

For the Commission, by the Division of Corporate Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.

[seal] George A. F itzsimmons, Secretary.

[FR Doc.75-28686 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 am]

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION- CONSTRUCTA INVESTMENT INC.

Issuance of License To Operate as a Small Business Investment Company

On July 10,1975, a notice was published in the F ederal R egister (40 FR 30332) stating that Constructa Investment Inc., located at 6430 Sunset Boulevard, Hollywood, California 90028, had filed an application with the Small Business Administration pursuant to 13 C.F.R. 107.- 102 (1975) for a license to operate as a small business investment company under the provisions of Section 301 (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended.

Interested parties were given until the close of business July 25, 1975, to submit their comments to SB£. No comments were received.

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 301(d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, a f t» having considered the application and all other pertinent information, on September 16, 1975, SBA Issued License No. 09/09-5185 to Constructa Investment Inc« to operate as a small business investment company.

Dated: October 17,. 1975.James T homas Phelan,

Deputy Associate Administrator for Investment.

{FR Doc.75-28638 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

{Declaration of Disaster Loan Area No. 1187;Amendment No. 1]

NEW YORKDeclaration of Disaster Area

The above numbered Declaration (See 40 FR 48558) is amended by adding Putnam and adjacent counties within the State of New York, and the time for filing applications is extended to December 15, 1975, for physical damage and July 14, 1976, for economic injury.

Dated: October 16,1975.Thomas S. K leppe,

Administrator.{-FR Doc.75-28639 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area #1193] NEW YORK

Declaration of Disaster AreaRichmond County, New York consti

tutes a disaster area because of damage resulting from severe storms, heavy rains, landslides, and flooding on September 22 through September 27, 1975. Eligible persons, firms and organizations may file applications for loans for physical damage until the close of business on December 15, 1975, and for economic injury until the close of business on July 16,1976, at:Small Business Administration, District

Office, 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3100, New York, N.Y. 10007.

or other locally announced locations. Dated: October 16,1975.

Thomas S. K leppe, Administrator.

[FR Doc.75-28640 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area 1188; Arndt. 1]

VIRGINIADeclaration of Disaster Area

In addition“ to previously declared counties (See 40 FR 48558) Prince William, and adjacent counties within the State of Virginia constitute a disaster area because of damage resulting from heavy rain and flooding on September 22 through 26, 1975. Eligible persons, firms and organizations may file applications for loans for physical damage until the


49826 NOTICESclose of business on December 15, 1975 and for economic injury until the close of business on July 14,1976 at:Small Business Administration, District

Office, Federal Building, Room 3015, 400 North Eighth Street, Richmond, Va. 23241.

or other locally announced locations. Dated: October 14,1975.

T homas S. K leppe, Administrator.

[PR Doc.75-28641 Piled 10-23-75;8:45 am]

DEPARTMENT OF LABORManpower Administration

EMPLOYMENT TRANSFER AND BUSINESS COMPETITION DETERMINATIONS UNDER THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACT

ApplicationsThe organizations listed in the attach

ment have applied to the Secretary of Agriculture for financial assistance in the form of grants, loans, or loan guarantees in order to establish or improve facilities at the locations listed for the purposes given in the attached list. The financial assistance would be authorized by the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 1924 (b), 1932, or 1942 (b).

The Act requires the Secretary of Labor to determine whether such Federal ' assistance is calculated to or is likely to result in the transfer from one area to another of any employment or business activity provided by operations of the applicant. I t is permissible to assist the establishment of a new branch, affiliate or subsidiary, only if this will not result in increased unemployment in the place of present operations and there is no reason to believe the new facility is being established with the intention of closing down an operating facility.

The Act also prohibits such assistance if the Secretary of Labor determines that it is calculated to or is likely to result in an increase in the production of goods, materials, or commodities, or the availability of services or facilities in the area, when there is not sufficient demand for such goods, materials, commodities, services, or facilities to employ the efficient capacity of existing competitive commercial or industrial enterprises, unless such financial or other assistance will not have an adverse effect upon existing competitive enterprises in the area.

The Secretary of Labor’s review and certification procedures are set forth at 29 CFR Part 75, published January 29, 1975 (40 FR 4393). In determining whether the applications should be approved or denied, the Secretary will take into consideration the following factors :

1. The overall employment and unemployment situation in the local area in which the proposed facility will be located.

2. Employment trenfts in the same industry in the local area.

3. The potential effect of the new facility upon the local labor market, with

particular emphasis upon its potential impact upon competitive enterprises in the same area.

4. The competitive effect upon other facilities in the same industry located in other areas (where such competition is a factor).

5. In the case of applications involving the establishment of branch plants or facilities, '-the potential effect of such new facilities on other existing plants or facilities operated by the applicant.

All persons wishing to bring to the attention of the Secretary of Labor any

information pertinent to the determinations which must be made regarding these applications are invited to submit such information in writing within two weeks of publication of this notice to: Deputy Assistant Secretary for Manpower, 601 D Street, NW, WashingtonD.C. 20213.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 20th day of October, 1975.

B en B urdetsky, Deputy Assistant Secretary

for Manpower.Applications received during the week ending Oct. 17,1975

Name of applicant Location of enterprise Principal product or activity

The Industrial development Board of the city of Florala, and Zorn Brothers, Inc.

Harris Gin Co., Inc..... ........... .......... ........... .Piggly Wiggly of Jasper, In c .. ...........j ...........The Rankin Co...... .......... ...............Birch Bros. Southern, Inc__________i .,___

Automated Energy Systems, Inc.

Old Indiana, Inc....................... _T.John, Edward, James Sadusky.. Bee Cee Manufacturing Co____Serloin Shops of Waxahachie, Inc. John J. Kuntz___ ____\___ T...Arpico Steel Industries_______

Florala, Ala------------ Soybeans, peanuts, com, and small grainshandling and storage facility.

Cordele, Ga................ Sales of fertilizer, seed, pesticides, gin cottonand clean, dry, sell peanuts.

Jasper, G a ..________ Retail grocery.Columbia, Miss..___ Chain of retail stores.Waxhaw, N.C__ .___ Manufacture textile finishing machinery,

cloth handling equipment, and mill sewing ^ machines.

Matthews, N.C........... Manufacture fabric straighteners, yield controls for textiles, heat and temperature

— controls for yam producers.Boone County, Ind__Family recreational park.Staples, M in n .....---- Student housing for vocational school.Burns Flat, Okla........ Aluminum and vinyl extrusions and thermal

sliding glass doors and windows.Waxahachie, Tex---- - Meat slaughter and processing plant.Napoleon, and Sales afid service of farm equipment.

Linton, N. Dak.Coolidge, Ariz---------- Rubbish containers and material handling

containers.

[PR Doc.75-28674 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

Office of the Secretary [TA-W-227]

BAKER CLOTHES, INC.Investigation Regarding Certification of Eli

gibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

% On October 14, 1975, the Department of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of Baker Clothes, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa. (TA-W- 227).

Accordingly, the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, has instituted an investigation as provided in Section 221(a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90.12.

The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether absolute or relative increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with men’s suits, sport coats and slacks produced lgy Baker Clothes, Inc., or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision and to the actual or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. A group meeting the eligibility requirements of

Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act in accordance with the provisions of Subpart B of 29 CFR Part 90,

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the petitioner or any other person showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigation may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown .below, on or before November 3,1975.

The petition filed in this ca^e is available for inspection at the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 3rd St. and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, D.C. 20210.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 14th day of October 1975.

Marvin M. F ooks,Acting Director, Office of

Trade Adjustment Assistance.[FR Doc.75-28711 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[TA-W-228]B & G SILVERMAN, INC.

Investigation Regarding Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment AssistanceOn October 14, 1975, the Department

of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) by the Amalgamated Cloth-


NOTICES 49827

lug Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of B & G Silverman, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (TA-W-228). '

Accordingly, the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of international Labor Affairs, has instituted an investigation as provided In Section 221(a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90.12. *

The purpose of the investigation is to determiné whether absolute, or relative increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with men’s suits and sport coats produced by B & G Silver- man, Inc., or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision and to the actual or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of tiie date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. A group meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title n , Chapter 2, of the Act in accordance with the provisions of Subpart B of 29 CFR Part 90.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the petitioner or any other person showing a substantial Interest in the subject matter of the Investigation may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, a t the address shown below, (Hi or before November 3, 1975.

The petition filed in this case is available for inspection a t the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 3rd St. and Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210.


Marvin M. F ooks, Acting Director, Office of

Trade Adjustment Assistance.]FR Doc.75-28712 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

(TA—W—234]JOSEPH H. COHEN, INC.


of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of Joseph H. Cohen, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (TA-W-234).

Accordingly, the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, has instituted an investigation as provided in Sec

tion 221(a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90.12.The purpose of the investigation is to

determine whether absolute or relative increases of Imports of articles like or directly competitive with men’s clothing produced by Joseph H. Cohen, Inc., or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision and to the actual or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. A group meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title n , Chapter 2, of the Act in accordance with the provisions of Sub- part B of 29 CFR Part 90.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the petitioner or any other person showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigation may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, on or before November 3,1975.

The petition filed in this case is available for inspection a t the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 3rd St. and Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210.

Signed a t Washington, D.C. this 14th day of October 1975.

M arvin M. F ooks,Acting Director, Office of

Trade Adjustment Assistance.{FR Doc.75-28713 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

{TA—W—229]CROSS COUNTRY CLOTHES, INC.


of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of Cross Country Clothes, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (TA-W-229). Accordingly, the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, has instituted an investigation as provided in Section 221 (a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90.12.

The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether absolute or relative increases of imports of articles like or directiy competitive with men’s suits and outer wear produced by Cross Country Clothes, Inc., or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or

production, or both, of such firm or subdivision and to the actual or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. A group meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title n , Chapter 2, of the Act in accordance with the provisions of Subpart B of 29 CFR Part 90.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the petitioner or any other person showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigation may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, a t the address shown below, on or before November 3, 1975.

The petition filed in this case is available for inspection a t the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 3rd St. and Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, D.C. 20210.



Trade Adjustment Assistance.[FR Doc.75-28714 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

ITA-W-233]GENTRY CLOTHING CO.


of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of Gentry Clothing Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (TA-W-223). Accordingly, the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, has Instituted an investigation as provided in Section 221(a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90.12.

The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether absolute or relative increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with men’s clothing and sportswear produced by Gentry Clothing Company, or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision and to the actual or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations


49828 NOTICESbegan or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. A group meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title n , Chapter 2, of the Act in accordance with the provisions of Subpart B of 29 CFR Part 90.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the petitioner or any other person showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigation may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, on or be- > fore November 3, 1975.

The petition filed in this case is available for inspection at the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 3rd St. and Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, D.C. 20210.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 14th day of October 1975.

Marvin M. Pooks,Acting Director, Office of

Trade Adjustment Assistance.[PR Doc.75-28715 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[TA—W—235]LOUIS GOLDSMITH, INC.


of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of Louis Goldsmith, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa. (TAW-235) . Accordingly, the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, has instituted an investigation as provided in Section 221(a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90.12.

The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether absolute or relative increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with men’s clothing produced by Louis Goldsmith, Inc., or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision and to the actual or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The group meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance

under Title n , Chapter 2, of the Act in accordance with the provisions of Subpart B of 29 CFR Part 90.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the petitioner or any other person showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigation may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, a t the address shown below, on or before November 3, 1975.

The petition filed in this case is available for inspection at the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 3rd St. and Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, D.C. 20210.


Marvin M. F ooks, ’ Acting Director, Office of

Trade Adjustment Assistance.[PR Doc.75—28716 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[TA-W-239] —IMPERIAL CLOTHING CO.

Investigation Regarding Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Worker AdjustmentAssistanceOn October 14, 1975, the Department

of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of Imperial Clothing Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (TA-W-239). Accordingly, the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, has instituted an investigation as provided in Section 221(a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90.12. . ,

The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether absolute or relative increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with men’s suits and sport coats produced by Imperial Clothing pompany, or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision and to the actual or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. A group meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title n , Chapter 2, of the Act in accordance with the provisions of Subpart B of 29 CFR Part 90.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the petitioner or any other person showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigation may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance! at the address shown below, on or before November 3,1975.

The petition filed in this case is available for inspection at the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 3rd St. and Constitution Ave. NW.', Washington, D.C. 20210.



Trade Adjustment Assistance.[FR Doc.75-28717 Filed 10-23-75;8;45 am]

[TA—W—231]MAX GOLDEN AND SON, INC.


of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of Max Golden and Son, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (TA-W-231). Accordingly, the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, has instituted an investigation as provided in Section 221(a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90,12.

The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether absolute or relative increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with men’s clothing—suits, sport coats produced by Max Golden and Son, Inc., or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or production, or both, of such, firm or subdivision and to the actual or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the .subdivision of the firm involved. A group meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act in accordance with the provisions of Subpart B of 29 CFR Part 90.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the petitioner or any other person showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigation may request a public


NOTICES 49829hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, a t the address shown below, on or before November 3,1975.. The petition filed in this case is avail

able for inspection at the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 3rd St. and Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, D.C. 20210.



Trade Adjustment Assistance.[PR Doc.75-28718 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 am]

[TA-W—237]MIDDISHADE CO., INC.


of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of The Middishade Company, Incorporated, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (TA-W-237). Accordingly, the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, has instituted an investigation as provided in Section 221(a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90.12.

The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether absolute or relative increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with men’s suits and sportcoats produced by The Middishade Company, Incorporated, or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision and to the actual or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation Will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. A group meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act in accordance with the provisions of Subpart B of 29 CFR Part 90.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the petitioner or any other person showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigation may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, on or before Novembers, 1975.

The petition filed in this case is available for inspection a t the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bupeau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 3rd St. and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, D.C. 20210.



Trade Adjustment Assistance.[PR Doc.75-28719 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]

[TA-W-238]MODERN COAT CO.


of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 ("the Act”) by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of Modem Coat Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (TA-W-238). Accordingly, the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, has instituted an investigation as provided in Section 221 (a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90.12.

The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether absolute or relative increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with men’s leisure suits, sport coats and jackets produced by Modem Coat Company, or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision and to the actual or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. A group meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title'll, Chapter 2, of the Act in accordance with the provisions of

t Subpart B of 29 CFR Part 90.Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the peti

tioner or any other person showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigation may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, a t the address shown below, on or before November 3, 1975.

The petition filed in this case is available for inspection a t the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor,

l


49830 NOTICES3rd St. and Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20210.



Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc.75-28720 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[TA-W-236]TEPLICK CLOTHES, INC.

Investigation Regarding Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Worker AdjustmentAssistanceOn October ,14, 1975, the. Department

of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) by the Amalgamated Cloth- * ing Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of Teplick Clothes, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (TA-W-236). Accordingly, the Acting" Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, has instituted an investigation as provided in Section 221 (a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90.12|

The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether absolute or relative increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with men’s suits and sports coats produced by Teplick Clothes, Inc., or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision and to the actual'or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. A group meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title n , Chapter 2, of the Act hi accordance with the provisions of Subpart B of 29 CFR Part 90.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the petitioner or any other person showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigation may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, a t the address shown below, on or before November 3,1975.

The petition filed in this case is available for inspection at the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 3rd St. and Constitution Ave NW., Washington, D.C. 20210'


Marvin M. Fooks, Acting Director, Office of

Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc.75-28721 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 am]

[TA—W—232]W. SEITCHIK AND SONS, INC.


of Labor received a petition filed under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, on behalf of the workers and former workers of W. Seitchik and Sons, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (TA-W-232). Accordingly, the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, has instituted an investigation as provided in Section 221 (a) of the Act and 29 CFR 90.12.

The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether absolute or relative increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with men’s suits, sport coats, and trousers produced by W. Seitchik and Sons, Inc., or an appropriate subdivision thereof have contributed importantly to an absolute decline in sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision and to the actual or threatened total or partial separation of a significant number or proportion of the workers of such firm or subdivision. The investigation will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved:" A group meeting the eligibility requirements of Section 222 of the Act will be certified as eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title n , Chapter 2, of the Act in accordance with the provisions of Subpart B of 29 CFR Part 90.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.13, the petitioner or any other person showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigation may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, on or before November 3, 1975.

The petition filed in this case is available for inspection at the Office of the Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor, 3rd St. and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, D.C. 20210.



Trade Adjustment Assistance.[FR Doc.75-28722 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]


NOTICES 49831

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Arndt. No. 2; I.C.C. Order No. 145; under revised S.O. No. 994]

AMERICAN RAILROAD ASSOCIATIONRerouting Traffic or Diversion of TrafficUpon further consideration of I.C.C.

Order No. 145 (RI and FWD), and good cause appearing therefor:

It is further ordered, That this amend- 145 be, and it is hereby, amended by substituting the following paragraph (g) for paragraph (g) thereof:

(g) Expiration date. This order shall expire at 11:59 p.m., January 15, 1976, unless otherwise modified, changed, or suspended.

Iti s further ordered, That this amendment shall become effective a t 11:59 p.m., October 15, 1975, and that this order shall be served upon the Association of American Railroads, Car Service Division, as agent of all railroads subscribing to the car service and car hire agreement under the terms of that agreement, and upon the American Short Line Railroad Association; and that it be filed with the Director, Office of the F ederal R egister.

Issued a t Washington, D.C. October 10, 1975.1

I nterstate Commerce Com m ission ,

[seal] R. D. P fahler,Agent.

[Eleventh Revised Exemption No. 99; Ex Parte No. 241]

BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. ET AL.Exemption of Rule 19 of the Mandatory

Car Service RulesIt appearing, That the U.S. railroads

own numerous plain gondolas less than 61 ft.; that under present conditions, there are substantial surpluses of these cars on the lines of the car owners; that return of these cars , to the car owners would result in their being stored idle on these lines; that such cars can be used by other carriers for transporting traffic offered for shipments to points remote from the car owners; and that compliance with Car Service Rules 1 and 2 prevents such use of plain gondolas, resulting in unnecessary loss of utilization of such cars.

I t is ordered, That pursuant to the authority vested in me by Car Service Rule 19, plain gondola cars described in the Official Railway Equipment Register,I.C.C. R.E.R. No. 396, issued by W. J. Trezise, or successive issues thereof, as having mechanical designation “GA”, “GB”, “GD”, “GH’\ “GS” and “GW”, which are less than 61 ft. 0 in. long, and which bear the reporting marks assigned to United States Railroads, shall be exempt from the provisions of Car Service Rules 1(a), 2(a), and 2(b). (See Exceptions, 1,2, and 3)

Exception 1.—This exemption does not supersede United States customs regulations applicable to cars owned by Canadian or Mexican railroads.

Exception 2.—This exemption" shall not apply to cars subject to service orders

issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission or to directives issued by the Car Service Division of the Association of American Railroads, restricting the use of designated cars.

Exception 3.—This exemption shall not apply to plain gondola cars owned by the railroads named below:Burlington Northern Inc., Reporting Marks:

BN-CBQ—GN-NP-SPS -1 The Central Railroad Company of New Jersey,

Robert D. Timpany, Trustee, Reporting Marks: CNJ.

The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, Reporting Marks: DRGW.

Florida East Coast Railway Company, Reporting Marks: FEC.

Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, Reporting Marks: GTW.

The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Reporting Marks: KCS._

Illinois Terminal Railroad Company, Reporting Marks: ITC.

Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company, Reporting Marks: LA.

Maine Central Railroad Company, Reporting Marks: MEC.

Missouri - Kansas -Texas Railroad Company, Reporting Marks: BKTY-MKT-MKTT.

Penn Central Transportation Company, Robert W. Blanchette, Richard C. Bond and John H. McArthur, Trustees, Reporting Marks: PC-PRR-NYC.

Richmond, Fredericksburg and Potomac Railroad Company, Reporting Marks: RFP.

Union Pacific Railroad Company, Reporting Marks: UP.Effective October 16,1975.Expires November 30,1975.Issued at Washington, D.C., October

10,1975.I nterstate Commerce

Com m ission ,[ seal] R . D. P fahler,

Agent.[FR Doc.75-28751 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Fifth Revised Exemption No. 90 Ex Parte No. 241]

AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Exemption of the Mandatory Car Service Rules

It appearing, That the railroads named below own numerous 50-ft. plain boxcars; that under present conditions there are substantial surpluses of these cars on their lines; that return of these cars to the owners would result in their being stored idle; that such cars can be used by other carriers for transporting traffic offered for shipments to points remote from the car owners; and that compliance with Car Service Rules 1 and 2 prevents such use of these cars, resulting in unnecessary loss of utilization of such cars.

It is ordered, That pursuant to the authority vested in me by Car Service Rule 19, 50-ft. plain boxcars described Ui the Official Railway Equipment Register, I.C.C. R.E.R. No. 396, issued by W. J. Trezise, or successive issues thereof, as having mechanical designation “XM”, and bearing reporting marks assigned

1 Addition.

to the railroads named below, shall be exempt from the provisions of Car Service Rules 1, 2(a), and 2(b).The Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad

Company, Reporting Marks: ACT.Atlanta & Saint Andrews Bay Railway Com

pany, Reporting Marks: ASAB.The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company,

Reporting Marks: BO.The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company,

Reporting Marks: CO-PM.Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Company,

Reporting Marks: C&EI-CEI.Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company,

Reporting Marks: EJE.Missouri-Hlinois Railroad Company, Report

ing Marks: MI.Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company,

Reporting Marks: BKTY-MKT.Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Report

ing Marks: MP.Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Re

porting Marks: N&W-NKP-WAB.The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Com

pany, Reporting Marks: P&LE.Raritan River Rail Road Company, Reporting

Marks: RR.Sacramento Northern Railway, Reporting

Marks: SN.Sierra Railroad Company,! Reporting Marks:

SERA.Soo Line Railroad Company, Reporting

Marks: SCO.The Texas and Pacific Railw&y Company,

Reporting Marks: T&P.Tidewater Southern Railway Company, Re

porting Marks: TS.WCTU Railway Company, Reporting Marks:

WCTR.Western Maryland Railway Company, Report

ing Marks: WM.Effective October 14, 1975.Expires November 15,1975.Issued at Washington, D.C., October 14,

1975.I nterstate C ommerce

Com m ission , .[seal! R . D. P fahler,

Agent/[FR Doc.75-28746 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[AB 1 (Sub-No. 12)]CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN

TRANSPORTATION CO.Abandonment of Line

Upon consideration of the record in the above-entitled proceeding, and of a staff-prepared environmental threshold assessment survey which is available to the public upon request; and

It appearing, That no environmental impact statement need be issued in this proceeding because this proceeding does not represent a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.; and good cause appearing therefor:

It is ordered, That applicant be, and it is hereby, directed to publish the appended notice in a newspaper of general circulation in Worth and Winnebago Counties, Iowa, and Freeborn County, Minn., on or before November 6, 1975 and certify to the Commission that this has been accomplished.


49832 NOTICESAnd it is further ordered, That notice

of this finding shall be given to the general public by depositing a copy of this order and the attached notice in the Office of the Secretary, Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D.C., for public inspection, and by delivering a copy of the notice to the Director, Office of the Federal Register, for publication in the Federal R egister as notice to interested persons.

Dated a t Washington, D.C., this 6th day of October, '1975.

By the Commission, Commissioner Brown.

[seal] R obert L. Oswald,Secretary.

[AB 1 (Sub-No. 12)]Chicago and North Western Transportation

Company Abandonment Between AlbertLea, Minnesota, and Lake Mills, I owa,in Freeborn County, Minnesota andWinnebago and Worth Counties, I owa

The Interstate Commerce Commission hereby gives notice that by order dated October 6, 1975, it has been determined that the proposed abandonment by the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company between Albert Lea, Minn., and Lake Mills, Iowa, a distance of 17.7 miles in Freeborn County, Minn, and Worth and Winnebago Counties, Iowa, if approved by the Commission, does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq., and that preparation of a detailed environmental impact statement will not be required under section 4332(2) (C) of the NEPA.

It was concluded, among other things, that the environmental impacts of the proposed action are considered insignificant because (1) the relatively sm all amount of traffic moved over this line can be handled by motor carrier without incurring any significant increase in air, water or noise pollution in the affected corridor, and (2) C&NW will continue to maintain rail service at Albert Lea and Emmons, Minn, and Lake Mills, Iowa. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Iowa State Conservation Commission, in conjunction with the Winnebago County Conservation Board, have expressed a desire to purchase the right-of-way from Albert Lea to Lake Mills for use as a multipurpose trail. The proposed land use plans are consistent with one another. Both states are interested in acquiring this right- of-way to establish statewide systems of recreational trials which will combine Iowa’s recreational trail to that of Minnesota should the abandonment be authorized.

This determination was based upon the staff preparation and consideration of an environmental threshold assessment survey, which is available on request to the Interstate Commerce Commission, Office of Proceedings, Washington, D.C. 20423; telephone 202-343-7966,

Interested persons may comment on this matter by filing their statements in writing with the Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D.C., 20423, on or before November 21, 1975.

This negative environmental determination shall become final unless good and sufficient reason demonstrating why an environmental impact statement should be prepared

for this action is submitted to the Commission by the above-specified date.


[FR Doc.75-28749 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[AB 17 (Sub-No. 1]VISALIA ELECTRIC RAILROAD CO.

Abandonment of LineUpon consideration of the record in the

above-entitled proceeding, and of a staff- prepared environmental threshold assessment survey which is available to the public upon request; and

It appearing, That no environmental impact statement need be issued in this proceeding because this proceeding does not represent a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.; and good cause appearing therefor:

It is ordered, That applicant be, and it is hereby, directed to publish the appended notice in a newspaper of general circulation in Tulare County, California, on or before November 6, 1975 and certify to the Commission that this has been accomplished.

And it is further ordered, That notice of this finding shall be given to the general public by depositing a copy of this order and the attached notice in the Office of the Secretary, Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D.C., for public inspection, and by delivering a copy of the notice to the Director, Office of the Federal Register, for publication in the F ederal R egister as notice to interested persons.

Dated at Washington, D.C., this 15th day of October, 1975.

By the Commission, Commissioner Brown.


[AB 17 (Sub-No. 1]Visalia Electric Railroad Company

Abandonment B etween Sequoia andElderwood, in T ulare County, California

The Interstate Commerce Commission hereby gives notice that by order dated October 15, 1975, it has been determined that the proposed abandonment by the Visalia Electric Railroad Company of its line of railroad between Sequoia and Elderwood, in Tulare County, Calif., a distance of 3.37 miles, if approved by the Commission, does not constitute, a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq., and that preparation of a detailed environmental impact Statement will not be required under section 4332(2) (C) of the NEPA.

It was concluded, among other things, that the environmental impacts of the

proposed action are not considered significant because no traffic has moved over the line since 1968 and there is no foreseeable future demand for service over the line, no diversion of traffic from rail to motor carrier will occur, and there are no development plans or land use policies in the tributary territory which are dependent on the availability of rail service.,

This determination was based upon the staff preparation and consideration of an environmental threshold assessment survey, which is available on request to the Interstate Commerce Commission, Office of Proceedings, Washington, D.C. 20423; telephone 202- 343-7966.

Interested persons may comment on this matter by filing their statements in writing with the Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D.C., 20423, on or before November 21, 1975.

This negative environmental determination shall become final unless good and sufficient reason demonstrating why an environmental impact statement should be prepared for this action is submitted to the Commission by the above-specified date.


[FR DOC.75-28748 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Corrected Exemption No. 104; Ex Parte No. 241]

NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY CO.AND THE PITTSBURGH AND LAKE ERIERAILROAD CO.

Exemption of the Mandatory Car Service Rules

It appearing, That the Norfolk and Western Railway Company (N&W) and The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company (P&LE), have each agreed to the unrestricted use by the other of its plain gondola cars 61 ft. in length, or greater, and that such mutual use of gondola cars will increase car utilization by reductions in switching and movements of empty gondola cars.

It is ordered, That pursuant to the authority vested in me by Car Service Rule 19, plain gondola cars described in the Official Railway Equipment Register, I.C.C. R.E.R. No. 396, issued by W. J. Trezise, or successive issues thereof, as having mechanical designations “GA,” *‘GB,” “GD,” “GH,” “GS,” “GT,” and “GW,” which are 61 ft. in length, or greater, which bear the reporting marks listed herein, may be used by the N&W and P&LE without regard to the requirements of Car Service Rules 1 and 2.

Reporting Marks

N&W: N&W, NKP, P&WV, VGN, WAB.P&L: P&LE.Effective October 7, 1975.Expires January 15, 1976.1

1 Corrected date.

FEDERAL REGISTER. VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

NOTICES 49833

Issued at Washington, D.C., October 7, 1975,

Interstate Commerce Commission,

R. D. Pfahler,Agent.

[PR Doc.75-28747 Filed 10-23-75; 8:45 am]

[Notice No. 804]ASSIGNMENT OF HEARINGS

October 21,1975.Cases assigned for "hearing, postpone

ment, cancellation or oral argument appear below and will be published only once. This list contains prospective assignments only and does not include cases previously assigned hearing dates. The hearings will be on. the issues as presently reflected in the Official Docket of the Commission. An attempt will be made to publish notices of cancellation of hearings as promptly as possible, but interested parties should take appropriate steps to insure that they are notified of cancellation or postponements of hearings, in which they are interested.MC 53905 Sub 107, Graves Truck bine, Inc.,

and MC 123004 Sub 6, The Luper Transportation Company, now assigned November 3, 1975, at Wicbita, Kans. is canceled and reassigned for October 29, 1975,. at Wicbita, Kans., Rooms 118 & 120, 1412 South Mato, Street, Internal Revenue Service Building.

MC 123407 Sub 234, Sawyer Transport, Inc., now assigned November 11, T975 at Dallas, Texas; is canceled and the application is dismissed.

MC 110988 Sub 322, Schneider Tank Lines, Inc., application dismissed.

MC 140700 Sub 1, H. D. Walls, d.b.a. H. D. Walls Trucking, now being December 18, 1975, at Office of Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D.C.

MC-F 12210, Jones Truck Lines, Inc.—Purchase (Portion)—Shippers Express, and Shippers Express—Purchase (Portion)— Jones Truck Lines, Inc., now assigned November 4, 1975, at Memphis, Tennessee, will be held in the Quality Inns, 1400 Springbrook Road; instead of in Room 978, Federal Office Building, 167 North Main Street. , v i5---

MC 117574 Sub 261, Daily Express, Inc., now being assigned December 18, 1975, at Office of Interstate Commerce - Commission, Washington, D.C. ■—

MC 105461 Sub 92, Herr’s Motor Express, Inc., now being assigned December 4, 1975, at Office of Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D.C.

MC 124796 Sub 145, Continental Contract Carrier Corp., now being assigned December 4, 1975, at Office of Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D.C.[seal] R obert L. Oswald,

Secretary.[FBDoc.75-28741; Filed 10-23-75;8:45 amJ

IRREGULAR-ROUTE MOTOR COMMON CARRIERS OF PROPERTY

Elimination of Gateway Letter Notices October 21,1975.

The following letter-notices of proposals to eliminate gateways for the purpose of reducing highway congestion, alleviating air and noise pollution, mini

mizing safety hazards, and conserving fuel have been filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission under the Commission’s Grate way Elimination Rules (49 CFR Part 1065), and notice thereof to all interested persons is hereby given as provided in such rules.

An original and two copies of protests against the proposed elimination of any gateway herein described may be filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission on or before November 3, 1975. A copy must also be served upon applicant or its representative. Protests against the elimination of a gateway will not operate to stay commencement of the proposed operation.

Successively filed letter-notices of the same carrier under these rules win be numbered consecutively for convenience in identification. Protests, if hny, must refer to such letter-notices by number.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E277), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: tioad equipment and parts, between points in Greene County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey in Salem and Cumberland Counties. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No! MC 39140 (Sub-No. E278), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Warren and Hamilton Counties, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 73 to junction U.S. Highway 30, thence along U.S. Highway 30 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E279), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 10380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting : Road equipment and parts, between points in Pulton County, NY., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania- New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 413 to junction New Jersey Highway 541, thence along New Jersey Highway 541 to junction New Jersey Highway 530, thence along New Jersey Highway 530 to junction U.S. Highway 206, thence along U.S. Highway 206 to junction Atlantic County line, thence along the Atlantic County

line to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this fifing Is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39149 (Sub-No. E280), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Washington County, N.Y„ on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a fine beginning a t the Pennsylvania- New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 73 to junction New-Jersey Highway 561, thence along New Jersey Highway 561 to junction U.S. Highway 322, thence along US. Highway 322 to junction New Jersey Highway 559, thence along New Jersey Highway 559 to junction U.S. Highway 9, thence along US. Highway 9 to junction New Jersey Highway 52, thence along New Jersey Highway 52 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of k en n e tt Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E281), filed May 14,1974. Applicant:. A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Chenango County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the oher, points in that part of New Jersey in Camden and Atlantic Counties. The purpose of this fifing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E282), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Madison County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the oilier, points in that part of New. Jersey in and south of Camden and Burlington Counties. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.,

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E283), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave,, W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Herkimer County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 413 to junction New Jersey Highway 541, thence along New Jersey Highway 541 to junction New Jersey Highway 38, thence along New Jersey Highway 38 to junction U.S. Highway 206, thence along U.S. Highway 206 to junction New Jersey Highway 70, thence


, 49834 NOTICESalong New Jersey Highway 70 to junction New Jersey Highway 72, thence along New Jersey 72 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E284), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DOTE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Broome, Lewis, and Oneida Counties, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 413 to junction New Jersey Highway 541, thence along New Jersey Highway 541 to junction New Jersey Highway 530, thence along New Jersey Highway 530 to. junction Ocean County line,' thence along Ocean County line to junction New Jersey Highway 72, thence along New Jersey Highway 72 to junction New Jersey Highway 534, thence along New Jersey Highway 534 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E285), filed May 14, Ì974. Applicant: A. DOTE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Clinton County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania- New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 413 to junction New Jersey Highway 541, thence along New Jersey Highway 541 to junction U.S. Highway 206, thence along U.S. Highway 206 to* junction Atlantic County line, thence along the Atlantic County line to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E286), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DOTE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Essex County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 73 to junction U.S. Highway 30, thence along U.S. Highway 30 to junction New Jersey Highway 563, thence along New Jersey Highway 563 to junction New Jersey Highway Atlantic City Expressway, thence along New Jersey Atlantic City Expressway to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E287), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DOTE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Franklin County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey in Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Gloucester, 'and Salem Counties., The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140. (Sub-No. E288), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DOTE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry.. Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between St. Lawrence County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 518 to junction New Jersey Highway 27, thence along New Jersey Highway 27 to junction Middlesex County line, thence along Middlesex County line to junction Ocean County line, thence along Ocean County line via Lakewood, N.J., to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 . (Sub-No. E289), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DOTE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Cortland County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania- New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 4.13 to junction New Jersey Highway 541, thence along New Jersey Highway 541 to junction New Jersey Highway 70, thence along New Jersey Highway 70 to junction New Jersey Highway 37, thence along New Jersey Highway 37 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E290), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DOTE PYLE, INC.,, 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a cornmon carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Tioga and Onondaga Counties, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey in and south of Burlington and Ocean Counties. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E291), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DOTE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa.

19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Oswego County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 1 to junction Middlesex County line, thence along the Middlesex County line to junction New Jersey Highway 33, thence along New "Jersey Highway 33 to junction New Jersey Highway 527, thence along New Jersey Highway 527 to junction New Jersey Highway 526, thence along New Jersey Highway 526 to junction U.S. Highway 9, thence along U.S. Highway 9 to junction New Jersey Highway 88, thence along New Jersey Highway 88 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E292), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DOTE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicants representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Jeffersoh County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 206 to junction Burlington County line; thence along the Burlington County line to junction New Jersey Highway 528, thence along New Jersey Highway 528 to junction New Jersey Highway 539, thence along New Jersey Highway 539 to junction New Jersey Highway 530, thence along New Jersey Highway 530 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No., MC 39140 (Sub-No. E293), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DOTE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transport-! ing: Road equipment and parts, between Tompkins County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 33 to junction New Jersey Highway 526, thence along New Jersey Highway 526 to junction U.S. Highway 9, thence along U.S. Highway 9 to junction New Jersey Highway 88, thence along New Jersey Highway 88 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E294), filed May 14,1974'. Applicant: A. DOTE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority s o u g h t to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between


Cayuga County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 1 to junction New Jersey Highway 571, thence along New Jersey Highway 571 to junction New Jersey Highway 526, thence along New Jersey Highway 526 to junction U.S. Highway 9, thence along U S. Highway 9 to junction New Jersey Highway 88, thence along New Jersey Highway 88 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E295), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Seneca County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey 518, thence along New Jersey Highway 518 to junction New Jersey Highway 27, thence along New Jersey Highway 27 to junction Middlesex County line, thence along the Middlesex County line to junction New Jersey Highway 571, thence along New Jersey Highway 571 to junction New Jersey Highway 528, thence along New Jersey Highway 528 to junction New Jersey Highway 88, thence along New Jersey Highway 88 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E296), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought • to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes^ transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Chemung County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points , in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 546 to junction U.S. Highway 206, thence along U.S- Highway 206 to junction New Jersey Highway 522, thence along New Jersey Highway 522 to junction New Jersey Highway 537, thence along New Jersey Highway 537 to junction New Jersey Garden State Parkway, thence along New Jersey Garden State Parkway to junction New Jersey Highway 520, thence along New Jersey Highway 520 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E297), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Yates County, N.Y., on the one hand,

/

NOTICESand, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 518 to junction New Jersey Highway 27, thence along New Jersey Highway 27 to junction New Jersey Highway 522, thence along New Jersey Highway 522 to junction New Jersey Highway 33, thence along New Jersey Highway 33 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E2988), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Ontario and Schuyler Counties, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania- New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 518 to junction New Jersey Highway 27, thence along New Jersey Highway 27 to junction New Jersey Highway 522, thence along New Jersey Highway 522 to junction Middlesex County line, thence along the Middlesex County line to junction New Jersey Highway 520, thence along New Jersey Highway 520 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E299), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INCS., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle,, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Wayne County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 518 to junction New Jersey Highway 2'7, thence along New Jersey Highway 27 to junction New Jersey Highway 522, thence along New Jersey Highway 522 to junction New Jersey Highway 535, thence along New Jersey, Highway 535 to junction New Jersey Highway 18, thence along New Jersey Highway 18 to junction New Jersey Highway 520, thence along New Jersey Highway 520 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E300), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Steuben County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of.a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. High-

49835way 202 to junction New Jersey Highway Spur 514, thence along New Jersey Highway Spur 514 to junction New Jersey Highway 514, thence along New Jersey Highway 514 to junction Somerset County line, thence along Somerset County line to junction New Jersey Highway 522, thence along New Jersey Highway 522 to junction New Jersey Highway 535, thence along New Jersey Highway 535 to junction New Jersey Highway 527, thence along New Jersey Highway 527 to junction New Jersey Highway 520, thence along New Jersey Highway 520 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E301), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor Vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Livington County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 12 to junction New Jersey Highway Spur 514, thence along New Jersey Highway Spur 514 to junction New Jersey Highway 514,‘thence along New Jersey Highway 514 to junction Raritan River, thence along the Raritan River to the New York-New Jersey State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E302), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Monroe County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line arid extending along New Jersey Highway 518 to junction New Jersey Highway 27, thence along New Jersey Highway 27 to junction New Jersey Highway 516, thence along New Jersey Highway 516 to junction Middlesex County line, thence along the Middlesex County line via Dunellen and Rahway, N.J., to the New York-New Jersey State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E303), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting : Road equipment and parts, between Allegany and Cattaraugus County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and ex-


49836 NOTICES

tending along New Jersey Highway 12 to junction UJS. Highway 202, thence along U.S. Highway 202 to junction U.S. Highway 22, thence along U.S. Highway 22 to junction New Jersey Garden State Parkway, thence along the New Jersey Garden State Parkway to junction U.S. Highway 280, thence along U.S- Highway 280 to junction U.S. Highway Business 1, thence along U.S. Highway Business 1 to the New York-New Jersey State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E304), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Wyoming County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 12 to junction U.S. Highway 202, thence along U.S. Highway 202 to junction U.S. Highway 22, thence along U.S. Highway 22 to junction New Jersey Garden State Parkway, thence along the New Jersey Garden State Parkway to junction U.S. Highway 280, thence along U.S. Highway 280 to junction U.S. Highway Business 1, thence along UJS. Highway Business 1 to the New York-New Jersey State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E305l>, filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Genessee County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the pennsylvania- New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 12 to junction New Jersey Highway 514, thence along New Jersey Highway 514 to junction New Jersey Highway 440, thence along New Jersey Highway 440 to the New York-New Jersey State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E306), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Orleans County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 202 to junction U.S. Highway 22, thence along U.S. Highway 22 to junction Middlesex County line, thence along the Middlesex County line via

Dunellen, N.J., and Rahway, N.J., to the New York-New Jersey . State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E307), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Chautautauqua County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New Jersey excluding those in Sussex County and those in Passaic County north of Interstate Highway 287. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E308), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Erie County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along Interstate Highway 78 to junction Garden State Parkway via East Orange, N.J., to junction Interstate Highway 280, thence along Interstate Highway 280 via Harrison, N.J., to junction U.S. Business Route 1, thence along U.S. Business Route 1 to the New Jersey-New York State line (excluding points in Warren County, N.J.). The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E309), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Niagara County, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that, part of New Jersey in and south of Hunterdon, Somerset, Union, Essex, and Hudson excluding these points in Hunterdon, and Somerset County north of Interstate Highway 78 and those in Essex County north of New Jersey Highway 46. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate . the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa. -

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E310), filed 'May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor Vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in the District of Columbia, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New Jersey; ‘Connecticut; Boston, Mass., and points in Massachusetts within ten miles of Boston and in New York, excluding points on and west of a line beginning at the

Pennsylvania-New York State line and extending along New York Highway 305 to junction New York Highway 243, thence along New York Highway 243 to junction New York Highway 98, thence along New York Highway 98 to junction New York Highway 78, thence along New Yprk Highway 78 to junction U.S. Highway 20A, thence along U.S. Highway 20A to junction U.S. Highway 20, thence along U.S. Highway 20 to junction New York Highway 75, thence along New York Highway 75 to the United States-Canada International Boundary line. The purpose - of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E3U), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Delaware, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New York. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E312), filed May 14,1974. Applicant; A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above) . Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Calvert, Anne Arundel, Cecil, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Carolin, Talbot, Dorchester, Wicomico, Somerset, and Worcester Counties, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New York. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E313), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, betwëen points in Garrett County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New York on and east of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New York State line and extending along Route 17 to junction New York Highway 8, thence along New York Highway 8 to junction New York Highway 12, thence along New York Highway 12 to junction New York Highway 26, thence along New York Highway 26 to junction New York Highway 3, thence along New York Highway 3 to junction New York Highway 185, thence along New York Highway 185 to junction U.S. Highway 11, thence along U.S. Highway 11 to junction New York Highway 56, thence along New York Highway 56 to junction New York Highway 37, thence along New York Highway 37 to the St. Lawrence River. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.


NOTICES 49837

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E314), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave:, W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicler over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Allegany County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New York on and east of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New York State line and extending along New York Highway 17 to junction New York Highway 8, thence along New York Highway 8 to junction New York Highway 12, thence along New York Highway 12 to junction New York Highway 26, thence along New York Highway 26 to junction New York Highway 3, thence along New York Highway 3 to junction New York Highway 185, thence along New York Highway 185 to junction U.S. Highway 11, thence along U.S. Highway 11 to junction New York Highway 56, thence along New York Highway 56 to the St. Lawrence River. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E315), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Washington County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New York on and east of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New York State line and extending along New York Highway 26 to junction New York Highway 17, thence along New York Highway 17 to junction U.S. Highway ■81, thence along U.S. Highway 81 to junction New York Highway, 57, thence along New York Highway 57 to Lake Ontario. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E316), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Carroll and Frederick Counties, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New York in and east of Oswego, Onondaga, Cortland, and Broome Counties. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E317), -filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Howard County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other,

points in that part of New York on and east of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New York State line and extending along New York Highway 17 to junction Ne^y York Highway 96, thence along New York Highway 96 via Ithica, N.Y., to junction U.S. Highway 20, thence along U.S. Highway 20 via Geneva, N.Y., to junction New York Highway 14, thence along New York Highway 14 to Lake Ontario. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E318), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points -in Montgomery County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in, that part of New York on and east of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New York State line and extending along New York Highway 282 to junction New York Highway 17, thence along New York Highway 17 to junction New York Highway 96, thence along New York Highway 96 to junction New York Highway 34, thence along New York Highway 34 to junction New York Highway 224, thence along New York Highway 224 to junction New York Highway 14A, thence along New York Highway 14A to junction New York Highway 364, thence along New York Highway 364 to junction New York Highway 247, thence along New York Highway 247 to junction U.S. Highway 20, thence along UJS. Highway 20 to junction New York Highway 332, thence along New York Highway 332 to junction U.S. Highway 90, thence along U.S. Highway 90 to junction U.S. Highway 490, thence along U.S. Highway 490 to junction New York Highway 33, thence along New York Highway 33 to junction New York Highway 261, thence along New York Highway 261 to Lake Ontaria The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E319), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Baltimore County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New York on and east of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New York State line and extending along New York Highway 17 to junction New York Highway 96, thence along New York Highway 96 to junction New York Highway 34, thence along New York Highway 34 to junction New York Highway 224, thence along New York Highway 224 to junction Chemung-Schuyler County line, thence along the Chemung-Schuyler County line to junction Scliuyler-Steuben County line, thence along the Schuyler-Steu- ben County line to junction New York

Highway 226, thence along New York Highway 226 to junction U.S. Highway 15, thence along U.S. Highway 15 to junction New York Highway 401, thence along New York Highway 401 to junction New York Highway 36, thence along New York Highway 36 to junction U.S. Highway 20A, thence along U.S. Highway 20A to Lake Erie. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E320), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Baltimore, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New York. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 391*40 (Sub-No. E321), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Prince George County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New York on and east of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania- New York State line and extending along U.S. Highway 15 to junction New York Highway 17, thence along New York Highway 17 to junction New York Highway 36, thence along New York Highway 36 to junction New York Highway 408, thence along New York Highway 408 to junction New York Highway 243, thence along New York Highway 243 to junction New York Highway 98, thence along New York Highway 98 to junction New York Highway 39, thence along New York Highway 39 to junction New York Highway 438, thence along New York Highway 438 to Lake Erie. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E322), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Charles County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New York on and east of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New York State line and extending along New York Highway 19 to junction New York Highway 243, thence along New York Highway 243 to junction New York Highway 98, thence along New York Highway 98 to junction New York Highway 39, thence along New York Highway 39 to Junction New York Highway 438, thence along New York Highway 438 to Lake Erie. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.


49838 NOTICESNo. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E323), filed

May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUES PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa.

. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Harford and St. Marys Counties, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New York on and east of a line beginning a t the New York-Pennsylvania State line and extending along the Cataraugus-Chautau- qua County line to junction New York Highway 39, thence along New York Highway 39 to Lake Erie. The purpose of this , filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E324), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Delaware, Maryland, and District of Columbia. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa. -

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E325), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Rhode Island, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 47 to junction New Jersey Highway 55, thence along New Jersey Highway 55 to junction New Jersey Highway 49, thence along New Jersey Highway 49 to junction New Jersey Highway 50, thence along New Jersey Highway 50 to the Atlantic OceamJThe purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E326), filed' May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Berkshire Comity, Mass., on the one hand, ahd, on the other? points in New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the. Delaware-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 295 to junction New Jersey Highway 49, thence along New Jersey Highway 49 to junction New Jersey Highway 553, thence along New Jersey Highway 553 to junction Dividing Creek, thence along Dividing Creek to the Delaware Bay. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E327), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Franklin County, Mass., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in

'New Jersey on and south of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 322 to junction New Jersey Highway 47, thence along New Jersey Highway 47 to junction New Jersey Highway 55, thence along New Jersey Highway 55 to junction Manantico Creek, thence along Manantico Creek to junction Maurice River, thence along the Maurice River to the Delaware Bay. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E328), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Hampshire, Hampden, and Worcester Counties, Mass., on the one hand,' and, on the other, points in New Jersey on and south of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line extending along U.S. Highway 322 to junction New Jersey Highway 77, thence along New Jersey Highway 77 to junction New Jersey Highway 49, thence along New Jersey Highway 49 to junction New Jersey Highway 553, thence along New Jersey Highway 553 to Dividing Creek, thence along Dividing Creek to the Delaware Bay. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E329),_ filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transport-

,, ing: Road equipment and parts, between points in Middlesex aiid Essex Comities, Mass., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New Jersey on and south of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 322 to junction New Jersey Highway 47, thence along .New Jersey Highway 47 to junction New Jersey Highway 50, thence along New Jersey Highway 50 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (SUb-No. E330), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Suffolk, Norfolk, Bristol, Plymouth, and

Barnstable Counties, Mass., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and south of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 42 to the junction New Jersey Highway 41, thence along New Jersey Highway 41 to junction New Jersey Highway 47, thence along New Jersey Highway 47 to junction New Jersey Highway 49, thence along New Jersey Highway 49 to junction New Jersey Highway 50, thence along New Jersey Highway 50 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E331), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Connecticut, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Delaware, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E332), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Avè., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority spught to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between New Castle County, Del., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along Interstate Highway 80 to junction U.S. Highway 46, thence along U.S. Highway 46 to the New York-New Jersey State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate jthe gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E333) , filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routés, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Sussex County, Del., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 206 to junction New Jersey Highway 68, thence along New Jersey Highway 68 to junction New Jersey Highway 545, thence along New Jersey Highway 545 to junction New Jersey Highway 530, thencé along New Jersey Highway 530 to junction New Jersey Highway 70, thence along New Jersey Highway 70 to junction New Jersey Highway 37, thence along New Jersey Highway 37 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of ttiis filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E334), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE,


NOTICES 49839

INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Kent County, Del., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 33 to junction U.S. Highway 130, thence along U.S. Highway 130 to junction New Jersey Highway 33, thence along New Jersey Highway 33 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E335), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Srhith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Howard County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania- New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 76 to junction New Jersey Highway 42, thence along New Jersey Highway 42 to junction Atlantic City Expressway, thence along the Atlantic City Expressway to junction New Jersey Highway 536, thence along New Jersey Highway 536 to junction New Jersey Highway 561, thence along New Jersey Highway 561 to junction U.S. Highway 30, thence along U.S. Highway 30 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E336), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Montgomery, Prince Georges, Charles, Anne Arundel, and Calvert Counties, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 76 to junction New Jersey Highway 42, thence along New Jersey Highway 42 to junction New Jersey Highway Atlantic City Expressway, thence along the New Jersey Highway Atlantic City Expressway to junction New Jersey Highway 536, thence along New Jersey Highway 536 to junction New Jersey Highway 561, thence along New Jersey Highway 561 to junction New Jersey Highway 54, thence along New Jersey Highway 54 to junction New Jersey Highway 557, thence along New Jersey Highway 557 to junction Tuckahoe River, thence along the Tuckahoe River to junction Cumberland-Atlantic County bne, thence along the Cumberland-Atlantic County line to junction West Creek, thence along West Creek to the

Delaware Bay. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E337), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s Representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Garrett, Allegany, Washington, Frederick, and Carroll Counties, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New Jersey. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E338), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes', transporting: Road equipment and parts, between St. Mary’s County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 322 to junction New Jersey Highway 47, thence along New Jersey Highway 47 to junction Maurice River, thence along the Maurice River to the Delaware Bay. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E339), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above).. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Baltimore, Harford, and Queen Anne Counties, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 413 to junction New Jersey Highway 541, thence along New Jersey Highway 541 to junction New Jersey Highway 530, thence along New Jersey Highway 530 to junction U.S. Highway 206, thence along U.S. Highway 206 to junction New Jersey Highway 70, thence along New Jersey Highway 70 to junction New Jersey Highway 72, thence along New Jersey Highway 72 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E340), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Baltimore, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 206 to junction New Jersey Highway 545,

thence along New Jersey Highway 545 to junction New Jersey Highway 545 Spur, thence along New Jersey Highway 545 Spur to junction New Jersey Highway 528 Spur, thence along New Jersey Highway 528 Spur to junction Ocean- Burlington County line, thence along the Ocean-BUrlington County line to junction New Jersey Highway 72, thence along New Jersey Highway 72 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E341) , filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Kent County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the Other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along U.S. Highway 206 to junction New Jersey Highway 545, thence along New Jersey Highway 545 to junction New Jersey Highway 530, thence along New Jersey Highway 530 to junction Ocean-Burlington County line, thence along the Ocean-Burlington County line to junction New Jersey Highway 72, thence along New Jersey Highway 72 to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E342), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Caroline County, Md., on the one hand, and, on. the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 413 to junction New Jersey Highway 541, thence along New Jersey Highway 541 to junction New Jersey Highway 530, thence along New Jersey Highway 530 to junction Ocean- Burlington County line, thence along the Ocean-Burlington County line to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E343), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Talbot County, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 38 to junction New Jersey Highway 530, thence along New Jersey Highway 530 to junction Ocean- Burlington County line, thence along the


49840Ocean-Burlington County line to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Ken- nett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E344), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above) . Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Dorchester County-, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along UJ3. Highway 76 to junction New Jersey Highway 42, thence along New Jersey Highway 42 to junction New Jersey Highway Atlantic City Expressway, thence along New Jersey Highway Atlantic City Expressway to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (SUb-No. E345), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between Wicomico, Worcester, and Somerset Counties, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of New Jersey on and north of a line beginning a t the Pennsylvania-New Jersey State line and extending along New Jersey Highway 70 to junction New Jersey Highway 72, thence along New Jersey Highway 72 to junction Ocean-Burlington County line, thence along the Ocean- Burlington County line to the Atlantic Ocean. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 - (Sub-No. E346), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in New Castle County, Del., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Maryland on and west of U.S. Highway 15. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Ken- nett Square, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E347), filed May 14, 1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Road equipment and parts, between points in Kent County, Del., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Garrett and Allegheny Counties, Md. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kennett Square, Pa.

NOTICESNo. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E348), filed

May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: General commodities (except those of unusual value, Class A and B explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, commodities requiring special equipment, and those injurious or contaminating to other lading), between Philadelphia, Pa., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Maryland, District of Columbia, and points in that part of New York on, north, and west of a line beginning at the Massachusetts-New York State line and extending along New York Highway 2 to junction U.S. Highway 9, thence along U.S. Highway 9 to junction U.S. Highway 20, thence along U.S. Highway 20 to junction New York Highway 7, thence along New York Highway 7 to the Pennsylvania-New York State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateways of Coatesville, Pa., and points in Pennsylvania within ten miles thereof.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E349), filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Machinery and parts, between Orleans, Genesee, Livingston, and Steuben Counties, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, that part of Virginia on and east of a line beginning a t the Maryland-Virginia State line and extending along the Fairfajc-Loudoun County line to junction Virginia Highway 28, thence along Virginia Highway 28 to junction U.S. Highway 29, thence along U.S. Highway 29 .to junction Bedford-Campbell County line, thence along the Bedford- Campbell County line to junction Frank- lin-Pittsylvania County line, thence along the Franklin-Pittsylvania County line to junction Franklin-Henry County line, thence along the Franklin-Henry County line to junction Patrick-Henry County line, thence along the Patrick - Henry County line to the North Carolina- Virginia State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of West Chester, Pa.

No. MC 39140 (Sub-No. E350) , filed May 14,1974. Applicant: A. DUIE PYLE, INC., 200 Garfield Ave., W. Chester, Pa. 19380. Applicant’s representative: Harry Smith (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Household goods, between points in the District of Columbia, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New Jersey; Connecticut; Boston, Mass., and points in Massachusetts within ten miles of Boston and in New York, excluding points on and west of a line beginning at the Pennsylvania-New York State line and extending along New York Highway 305 to junction New York Highway 243,

thence along New York Highway 243 to junction New York Highway 98, thence along New York Highway 98 to junction New York Highway 78, thence along New" York Highway 78 to junction U.S. Highway 20A, thence along U.S. Highway 20A to junction U.S. Highway 20, thence along U.S. Highway 20 to junction New York Highway 75, thence along New York Highway 75 to the United States-Canada International Boundary line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateways of Coatesville, Pa., and points in Pennsylvania within ten miles thereof.

No. MC 114552 (Sub-No. E129), filed August 25, 1975. Applicant: SENNTRUCKING CO., P.O. Drawer 220, Newberry, S.C. 29108. Applicant’s representative: William P. Jackson, Jr., 919 Eighteenth St., NW., Washington, D.C. 20006. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier oy motor vehicle, over Irregular routes, transporting: Gypsum and gypsum products, composition "board, urethane and urethane products, and such insulation materials and roofing and roofing materials and supplies as are useful in the manufacture and distribution of roofing and roofing materials (except in bulk), from points in Wayne County, N.C., to points in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, the District of Columbia, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of the facilities of the Celotex Oorp., in Wayne County, N.C.

No. MC 115603 (Sub E7) (Correction), filed May 30, 1974, published in the F edera l R e g is t e r December 23, 1974. Applicant: TURNER BROS. TRUCKING CO., INC., P.O. Box 92626, Oklahoma City, Okla. 73109.-Applicant’s representative: Henry Piwowarek (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) Machinery, materials, supplies and equipment incidental to, or used in the construction, development, operation, and maintenance of facilities for the discovery, development, and production of natural gas and petroleum; and (2) Earth drilling machinery and equipment, and machinery, equipment, materials, supplies and pipe incidental to, used in, or in connection with (a) the transportation, installation, removal, operation, repair, servicing, maintenance, and dismantling of drilling machinery and equipment, (b) the completion of holes or wells drilled, (c) the production, storage and transmission of commodities resulting from drilling operations at well or hole sites, and (d) the injection or removal of commodities into or from holes or wells, (B) between points in Texas, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Colorado on and east of a line beginning at the Colorado- Wyoming State line and extending along Colorado Highway 125, to its junction with Colorado Highway 14, thence along Colorado Highway 14 to its junction with Interstate Highway 40, thence along m-


NOTICES 49841

terstate Highway 40 to its junction with Colorado Highway 9, thence along Colorado Highway 9 to its junction with Interstate Highway 50, thence west along Interstate Highway 50 to its junction with Colorado Highway 69, thence south along Colorado Highway 69 to its junction with Interstate Highway 25 at Wal- senburg, thence west on U.S. Highway 160 at Walsenburg to its junction with Colorado Highway 12, thence south on Colorado Highway 12 to its junction with Interstate Highway 25 a t Trinidad, thence south on Interstate Highway 25 to the Colorado-New Mexico State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of points in Oklahoma. The purpose of this correction is to add the above territory to E7. -

No. MC 115603 (Sub-No. E21) (Correction) filed May 30,1974, published in the F ederal R e g is t e r December 28, 1974. Applicant: TURNER BROS. TRUCKING CO., INC., P.O. Box 94626, Oklahoma City, Okla. 73109. Applicant’s representative: Jack E. Turner (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (c) between points in Missouri on and west of a line beginning at Missouri-Illinois State line and extending along U.S. Highway 50 to its junction with U.S. Highway 67, thence along U.S. Highway 67 to the Missouri- Arkansas State line, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Louisiana on and west of a line beginning at the Louisiana-Arkansas State line and extending along Louisiana Highway 7 to its junction with U.S. Highway 71, thence along U.S. Highway 71 to its junction with Louisiana Highway 10, thence along Louisiana Highway 10 to its junction with U.S. Highway 167, thence along U.S. Highway 167 to its junction with U.S. Highway 90, thénce along U.S. Highway 90 to its junction with Louisiana Highway 1, thence along Louisiana Highway 1 to the Gulf of Mexico, (points in Texas) *. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateways indicated with asterisks above. The purpose of this correction is to extend the territorial destination above.

No. MC 115603 (Sub E38), (Correction), Filed May 30, 1974, published in the F ederal R e g is t e r . Applicant: TURNER BROS. TRUCKING CO. INC., P.O. Box 94626, Oklahoma City, Okla. 73109. Applicant’s representative: Henry Piwowarek (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Machinery, equipment, materials, and supplies used in, or in connection with the discovery, development, production, refining, manufacture, processing, storage, transmission and distribution of natural gas and petroleum and their products and by-products, and machinery, materials, equipment, and supplies used in, or in connection with the construction, operation, repair, serving, maintenance, and dismantling of Pipelines, including the stringing and picking up thereof, except the stringing or picking up of pipe in connection with

main or trunk pipelines, (b) between points in Arkansas, and the one hand, and, on the other, points in North Dakota on and west of a line beginning at the North Dakota-South Dakota State line and extending north along North Dakota Highway 31 to its junction with North Dakota Highway 21, thence west along North Dakota Highway 21 to its junction with unnumbered highway at Car-

. son, thence iiorth on unnumbered highway to U.S. Interstate 94, thence east on U.S. Interstate Highway 94 to its junction with North Dakota Highway 31, thence north on North Dakota Highway 31 to its junction with North'Dakota Highway 200A, thence west on North Dakota Highway 200A to its junction with North Dakota Highway 200, thence north on North Dakota Highway 200 to its junction with North Dakota Highway 48, thence north along North Dakota Highway 48 to its junction with U.S. Highway 83, thence on U.S. Highway 83 to North Dakota Highway 23, thence along North Dakota Highway 23 to its junction at New Town with North Dakota Highway 1804, thence 9 miles along North Dakota Highway 1804 to its junction with unnumbered highway, thence west and north along unnumbered highway to its junction with U.S. Highway 2 at Ray, thence west on U.S. Highway 2 to its junction with U.S. Highway 85, thence on U.S. Highway 85 to the United States-Canada International Boundary line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateways of points in Texas and Oklahoma. The purpose of this correction is to add the above territory to E38.

No. MC 115603 (Sub E45) (Correction), filed May 30, 1974, published in the F ederal R e g is t e r June 2, 1975. Applicant: TURNER BROS. TRUCKING CO., INC., P.O. Box 94626, Oklahoma City, Okla. 73109. Applicant’s representative: Henry Piwowarek (same as above) . Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Machinery, materials, supplies and equipment incidental to, -or used in the construction, development, operation and maintenance of facilities for 'the discovery, development, and production of natural gas and petroleum; (e) between points in Colorado on and north of a line beginning at the Colorado-Utah State line and extending along U.S. Highway 50 to its junction with Colorado Highway 101 near Las Animas, thence south along Colorado Highway 101 to its junction with U.S. Highway 160, thence along U.S. Highway 160 to its junction with unnumbered highway near Pritchett, thence south

«along unnumbered highway to the Colorado-Oklahoma State line, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New Mexico on and east of a line beginning at the New Mexico-Oklahoma State line and extending along New Mexico Highway 18 to junction New Mexico Highway 88, thence east along New Mexico Highway 88 to its junction with New Mexico Highway 330, thence south along New Mexico Highway 330 to its

junction with unnumbered highway near Kenna, thence south along unnumbered highway to its junction with U.S. Highway 380, thence east along U.S. Highway 380 to its junction with New Mexico Highway 172, thence south along New Mexico Highway 172 to its junction with U.S. Highway 82, thence west along U.S. Highway 82 to its junction with New Mexico Highway 529, thence east along New Mexico Highway 529 to its junction with U.S. Highway 62, thence southwest along U.S. Highway 62 to its junction with New Mexico Highway 176, thence southeast along New Mexico Highway 176 to its junction with New Mexico Highway 18, thence south along New Mexico Highway 18 to the New Mexico- Texas State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of points in Oklahoma. The purpose of this correction is to add the above territory to E45.

No. MC 115603 (Sub E46), (correction), filed May 30, 1974, published in the F e d era l R e g is t e r Monday, June 2,1975. Applicant: TURNER BROS. TRUCKING CO., INC., P.O. Box 94626, Oklahoma City, Okla. 73109. Applicant’s representative: Henry Piwowarek (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (2) Earth drilling machinery and equipment, and machinery, equipment, materials, supplies and pipe incidental to, used in, or in connection with (a) the transportation, maintenance, and dismantling of drilling machinery and equipment, (b) the completion of holes or wells drilled, (c) the production, storage, and transmission of commodities resulting from drilling operations at well or hole sites and (d) the injection or removal of commodities into or from holes or wells. The purpose of this filling is to eliminate the gateway of points in Oklahoma. The purpose of this correction is to include commodity description in (2) above.

No. MC 115841 (Sub-No. E74) (Correction) filed June 4, 1974, published in the F ederal R e g is t e r May 8, 1975. Applicant: COLONIAL REFRIGERATED TRANSPORTATION, INC., P.O. Box 10327, Birmingham, Ala. 35201. Applicant’s representative: E. Stephen Heis- ley, 666 Eleventh St., NW., Washington, D.C. 20001. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Dairy products, as defined by the Commission, unfrozen (except liquid commodities in bulk), in vehicles equipped with mechanical refrigeration, from the plant site of Swift & Company at Rochelle, 111., (A) to points in South Carolina, points in Mississippi on and south of a line beginning a t the Mississippi-Alabama State line and extending along Interstate Highway 20 to junction Mississippi Highway 18, thence along Mississippi Highway 18 to junction U.S. Highway 61, thence along U.S. Highway 61 to the Louisiana-Mississippi State line, and points in Louisiana on and south of Interstate Highways 10 and 12 (Birm-


49842 NOTICESingham, Ala., or Chattanooga, Term.) *; and (B) to points in North Carolina (Chattanooga, Tenn.) *. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateways indicated by asterisks above. The purpose of this correction is to correct the commodity and territorial descriptions.

No. MC 119641 (Sub-No. E19), filed May 10, 1974. Applicant: RINGLE EXPRESS, INC., P.O. Box 335, Moline, 111. 61265. Applicant’s representative: Robert C. Doran (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Agricultural machinery and parts; (1) from points in the Lower Peninsula of Michigan to points in Arkansas, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, points in Tennessee on and west of a line beginning a t the Alabama-Tennessee State line and extending along Tennessee Highway 13 to junction U.S. Highway 41A, thence along U.S. Highway 41A to the Kentucky-Tennessee State line, points in Kentucky on and west of U.S. Highway 41, points in Illinois on and southwest of a line beginning a t the Indiana-Illinois State line and extending along Illinois Highway 130 to junction UB. Highway 45, thence along U.S. Highway 45 to junction U.S. Highway 136, thence along U.S. Highway 136 to the Illinois-Iowa State line, and points in Nebraska on and south of a line beginning a t the Missouri-Nebraska State line and extending along Nebraska Highway 2 to junction UB. Highway 34, thence along U.S. Highway 34 to junction Nebraska Highway 2, thence along Nebraska Highway 2 to the Nebraska-South Dakota State line; and (2) from points in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan to points in Arkansas, Mississippi, points in Missouri on and south of Interstate Highway 44 to junction UB. Highway 65, thence along U.S. Highway 65 to junction UB. Highway 53, thence along UB. Highway 53 to the Missouri-Hlinois State line, points in Illinois on and south of a line beginning a t the Hlinois-Missouri State line and extending along U.S. Highway 54 to junction U.S. Highway 36, thence along U.S. Highway 36 to junction Illinois Highway 133, thence along Illinois Highway 133 to the Indiana-Illinois State line, points in Indiana on and west of a line beginning at the Indiana-Illinois State line and extending along Interstate Highway 70 to junction U.S. Highway 231, thence'along U.S. Highway 231 to the Indiana-Kentucky State line, points in Kentucky on and west of U.S. Highway 231, and points in Tennessee on and west of U.S. Highway 127. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Shelbyville, 111.

No. MC 119641 (Sub E21), filed May 10,1974. Applicant: RINGLE EXPRESS, INC., P.O. Box 335, Moline, HI. 61265. Applicant’s representative: Robert C. Doran (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Agricultural machinery and parts, from points in Iowa to points in Kentucky, Tennessee, points in Mississippi on and east .of Interstate Highway 55,

points in Illinois on and east of a line beginning a t the Missouri -Illinois State line and extending along Illinois Highway 150 to junction Illinois Highway 4, thence along Illinois Highway 4 to junction U.S. Highway 36, thence along U.S. Highway 36 to the Indiana-Illinois State line, points in Indiana on and south of U.S. Highway 36, and points in Ohio on and south of a line beginning a t the In- diana-Ohio State line and extending, along U.S. Highway 36 to junction Ohio Highway 151, thence along Ohio High-^ way 151 to the Ohio-West Virginia State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Shelbyville, 111.

No. MC 119641 (Sub E32), filed May 13, 1974. Applicant: RINGLE EXPRESS, INC., P.O. Box 335, Moline, 111. 61265. Applicant’s representative: Robert C. Doran (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Composition board, from Lockport, N.Y., to points in Alabama on and south of a line beginning at the Mississippi- Alabama State line and extending along UB. Highway 82, to junction U.S. Highway 231, thence along U.S. Highway 231 to the Alabama-Georgia State line, points in Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, points in Kentucky on and west of a line beginning at Hawesville, Kentucky and extending along Kentucky Highway 69 to junction Kentucky Highway 85, thence along Kentucky Highway 85 to junction U.S. Highway 62, thence along UB. Highway 62 to junction U.S. Highway 45, thence along U.S. Highway 45 to junction U.S. Highway Alt. 45, thence along U.S. Highway Alt. 45 to the Kentucky- Tennessee State line; points in Louisiana; points in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan on and west of U.S. Highway 41 from the Canada-Michigan Border to the Michigan-Wisconsin State line; points in Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, points in Tennessee on and west of a line beginning at the Kentucky- Tennessee State line and extending along U.S. Highway Alt. 45, to juction Tennessee Highway 13, thence along Tennessee Highway 13 to the Tennessee-Mississippi State line, and points in Wisconsin. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of North Judson, Indiana.

No. MC 119641 (Sub E35), filed May 10, 1974. Applicant: RINGLE EXPRESS, INC., P.O. Box 335, Moline, HL 61265. Applicant’s representative: Robert C. Doran (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Farm feed mills and farm feed mill parts and attachments when moving with farm feed mills, except commodities which because of size or weight require the use of special equipment^ from Crown Points, Ind., to points in Arkansas, points in Illinois on and southwest of a line beginning at the Indiana-Illinois State line and extending along Illinois Highway 1 to junction U.S. Highway 45, thence along U.S. Highway 45 to junction U.S. Highway 36, thence along UB. Highway 36 to junction Illinois Highway 104, thence

along Illinois Highway 104‘to the Illinois- Missouri State line, points in Kansas, Mississippi, points in Missouri on and south of a line beginning at the Missouri- Hlinois State line and extending along U.S. Highway 24 to junction Missouri Highway 6, thence along Missouri Highway 6 to junction Missouri Highway 13, thence along Missouri Highway 13 to junction U.S. Highway 136, thence along U.S. Highway 136 to the Missouri-Nebraska State line and extending along

-U.S. Highway 136 to junction Nebraska Highway 15, thence along Nebraska Highway 15 to U.S. Highway 6, thence along U.S. Highway 6 to junction U.S. Highway 381, thence along UB. Highway 281 to junction Nebraska Highway 2, thence along Nebraska Highway 2 to junction UB. Highway 20, thence along U.S. Highway 20 to the Nebraska-Wyoming State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Shelbyville, HI.

No. MC 119641 (Sub E36), filed May 10, 1974. Applicant: RINGLE EXPRESS, INC., P.O. Box 335, Moline, HI. 61265. Applicant’s representative: Robert C. Doran (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Agricultural machinery and parts,(1) from points in Indiana on and north of U.S. Highway 36 to points in Arkansas, Kansas, Mississippi, points in Tennessee on and west of a line beginning at the Tennessee-Kentucky State line and extending along U.S. Highway 45 to junction UB. Highway 45W, thence along UB. Highway 45W to junction U.S. Highway 45, thence along UB. Highway 45 to the Tennessee-Mississippi State line; points in Missouri on and south of a line beginning at the Hlinois-Missouri State line and extending along U.S. Highway 36 to junction Missouri Highway 13, thence along Missouri Highway 13 to junction U.S. Highway 136, thence along U.S. Highway 136 to junction U.S. Highr way 71, thence along U.S. Highway 71 to the Missouri-Iowa State line; points in Nebraska on and south of a line beginning at the Iowa-Nebraska State line and extending along Nebraska Highway 2 to junction UB. Highway 34, thence along U.S. Highway 34 to junction Nebraska Highway 2, thence along Nebraska Highway 2 to junction U.S. Highway 385, thence along U.S. Highway 385 to the Nebraska-South Dakota State line; and(2) from points in Indiana on and south of U.S. Highway 36 to points in Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska; points in Minnesota on and south of U.S. Highway 2; points in Missouri on and north of a line beginning at the Missouri-Hlinois State line and extending along U.S. Highway 54 to junction Missouri Highway 5, thence along Missouri Highway 5 to junction U.S. Highway 66 and 144, thence along U.S. Highway 66 and 144 to the Missouri- Oklahoma State line; points in Wisconsin on and west of a line beginning at the Hlinois-Wisconsin State line arid extending along UB. Highway 51 to junction Wisconsin Highway 26, thence along Wisconsin Highway 26 to junction U.S. High-


NOTICES 49843way 41, thence along U.S. Highway 41 to the Wisconsin-Michigan State line; and points in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan on and west of a line beginning at the Wisconsin-Michigan State line and extending along Wisconsin Highway 35 to junction U.S. Highway 41, thence along U.S. Highway 41 to Marquette, Michigan. The purpose of this- filing is to eliminate the gateway of Shelbyville, 111.

No. MC 119641 (Sub-No. E41), filed May 9, 1974. Applicant: RINGLE EXPRESS, INC., Route 1, Box 335,„Moline, HI. 61265. Applicant’s representative: Robert C. Doran (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Agricultural implements, from Coldwater, Ohio, to points in Iowa and Missouri. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Iroquois County, HI.

No. MC 119641 (Sub E44), filed May 9, 1974. Applicant: RINGLE EXPRESS, INC., Route 1, Box 335, Moline, HI. 61265. Applicant’s representative: Robert C. Doran (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Agricultural machinery and parts from points in Minnesota on and south of U.S. Highway 2 to points in Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, points in Ohio on and south of a line beginning at the Indiana-Ohio State line and extending along U.S. Highway 40 to junction U.S. Highway 22; thence along U.S. Highway 22 to Steubenville, Ohio; points in Indiana on and south of U.S. Highway 36; points in Illinois on and south of a line beginning at the Indiana- Ulinois State line and extending along U.S. Highway 26 to junction Hlinois Highway 4, thence along Hlinois Highway 4 to junction niinois Highway 150, thence along Hlinois Highway 150 to Chester, 111.; points in Missouri on and east of Missouri Highway 51; and points in Arkansas on and east of a line beginning at the Missouri-Arkansas State line and extending along Arkansas Highway 1 to junction U.S. HighWky 65, thence along U.S. Highway 65 to the Arkansas-Louisiana State line.

No. MC 119641 (Sub E45), filed May 9, 1974. Applicant: RINGLE EXPRESS, INC., Route 1, Box 335, Moline, HI. 61265. Applicant’s representative: Robert C. Doran (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Routes, transporting: Agricultural machinery parts, from Points in Ohio to points in Kansas, points in Missouri west of U.S. Highway 67_ points in Nebraska south of U.S. Highway 20, points in Arkansas on and west of U.S. Highway 67, points in Iowa on and south of a line beginning at Burlington, Iowa and extending along U.S. Highway 34 to junction U.S. Highway 63, thence along U.S. Highway 63 to junction Iowa Highway 163, thence along Iowa Highway 163 to junction Iowa High- way I4i t thence along Iowa Highway 141 to Sioux City, Iowa, and points in Hli- hois south, west and north of a line beginning at the Hlinois-Iowa State line

and extending along U.S. Highway 34 to junction Illinois Highway 116, thence along Hlinois Highway 116 to junction Hlinois Highway 121, thence along Illinois Highway 121 to junction Hlinois Highway 32, thence along Hlinois Highway 32 to junction U.S. Highway 40, thence along U.S. Highway 40 to the Illinois-Missouri State line. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Shelbyville, HI.

No. MC 119897 (Sub-No. El),, filed June 4, 1974. Applicant: A-l TRANSPORTATION CO., P.O. Box 21275, 3102 Maury St., Houston, Tex. 77026. Applicant’s representative: J. G. Dail, Jr., 1111 E St. NW., Washington, D.C. 20004. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (A) Machinery, equipment, materials, and supplies used in, or in connection with, the discovery, development, production, refining, manufacture, processing, storage, transmission, and distribution of natural gas and petroleum, and their products and by-products, and (B) Machinery, equipment, materials, and supplies used in, or in connection with, the construction, operation, repair, servicing, maintenance, and dismantling of pipelines, other than pipelines used for the transmission of natural gas, petroleum, their products, and by-products, water, or sewerage, restricted to the transportation of shipments moving to or from pipeline right of way; (1) Between points in that part of Texas on, north, and west, erf a line beginning at the Oklahoma-Texas State line extending along Texas Highway 136 to junction Texas Highway 207, thence along Texas Highway 207 to junction U.S. Highway 66, thence along U.S. Highway 66 to junction Texas Highway 70, thence along Texas Highway 70 'to JMatador, thence along U.S. Highway, 70 to the Texas- New Mexico State line, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Oklahoma on, east, and south of a line beginning a t the Texas-Oklahoma State line extending along U.S. Highway 62 to Lauton, thence along Oklahoma Highway 7 to junction Oklahoma Highway 1, thence along Oklahoma Highway 1 to junction Oklahoma Highway 99, thence along Oklahoma Highway 99 to junction Interstate Highway 44, thence along Interstate Highway 44 to the Oklahoma- Missouri State line (points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park, Tex.) *.

(2) Between points in that part of Texas on, south, and west of a line beginning at the Texas-New Mexico State line extending along U.S. Highway 70 to Matador, thence along Texas Highway 70 to junction Texas Highway 208, thence along Texas Highway 208 to Snyder, thence along Texas Highway 350 to Big Spring, thence along U.S. Highway 87 to San Angelo, thence along U.S. Highway 277 to the United States-Mex- ico International Boundary line, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Oklahoma on, south, and east of a line beginning at the Oklahoma Kansas State line extending along U.S. Highway 281 to junction Oklahoma

Highway 45, thence along Oklahoma Highway 45 to junction Oklahoma Highway 8, thence along Oklahoma Highway8 to Fairview, thence along Oklahoma Highway 58 to junction Oklahoma Highway 33, thence along Oklahoma Highway 33 to junction U.S. Highway 283, thence along U.S. Highway 283 to junction Oklahoma Highway 47 < thence along Oklahoma Highway 47 to the Texas-Oklahoma State line (points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park, Tex.) *; (3) Between points on, and in that part of Texas bounded by a line beginning at the Texas-Oklahoma State line extending along Texas Highway 203 to junction U.S. Highway 83, thence along U.S. Highway 83 to junction Texas Highway 338, thence along Texas Highway 338 to Memphis, thence along U.S. Highway 287 to Estelline, thence along Texas Highway 86 to Turkey, thence along Texas Highway 70 to junction Texas Highway 208, thence along Texas Highway 208 to Snyder, thence along Texas Highway 350 to Big Spring, thence along U.S. Highway 87 to San Angelo, thence along U.S. Highway 277 to the United States-Mexico International Boundary line, thence along the United States- Mexico International Boundary line to the Gulf of Mexico, thence along the Gulf Coast to the Brazos River, thence along the Brazos River to Waco, thence along Interstate Highway 35. to Hillsboro, thence along interstate Highway 35E to Denton, thence along Interstate Highway 35 to the Texas-Oklahoma State line, and thence along the Texas- Oklahoma State line to the point of beginning, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Oklahoma on, north,"and west of a line beginning a t the Texas-Oklahoma State line extending along U.S. Highway 377 to Ma- dill, thence along Oklahoma Highway 99 to junction Oklahoma Highway 7, thence along Oklahoma Highway 7 to Antlers, thence along U.S. Highway 271 to junction Oklahoma Highway 2, thence along Oklahoma Highway 2 to junction Oklahoma Highway 31, thence along Oklahoma Highway 31 to Quinton, thence along Oklahoma Highway 71 to Enterprise, thence along Oklahoma Highway9 to junction U.S. Highway 271, thence along U.S. Highway 271 to the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line (points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park, Tex.) *.

(4) Between points on and in that part of Texas bounded by a line beginning a t the Gulf of Mexico, thence along the Brazos River to Waco, thence along Interstate Highway 35 to Hillsboro, thence along Interstate Highway 35W to Denton, thence along Interstate Highway 35E to Dallas, thence along Interstate Highway 45 to Huntsville, thence along U.S. Highway 190 to Woodville, thence along U.S. Highway 69 to Beaumont, thence along Interstate Highway 10 to the Texas-Louisiana State line, thence along the Texas-Louisiana State line to the Gulf of Mexico, and thence along the Gulf Coast to the point of beginning, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Oklahoma on, north, and west of a line beginning at the


49844 NOTICES

Texas-Oklahoma State line extending along U .S. Highway 377 to Madill, thence along Oklahoma Highway 99 to junction Oklahoma Highway 7, thence along Oklahoma Highway 7 to Atoka, thence along TJ.S. Highway 69 to Muskogee, thence along U.S. Highway 62 to the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line (points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park, Tex.) *; (5) Between points in that part of Texas bounded by a line from Dallas, Tex., along U.S. Highway 175 to Jacksonville, thence along U.S. Highway 69 to junction U.S. Highway 84, thence along U.S. Highway 84 to the Louisiana- Texas State line, thence along the Louisiana-Texas State line to U.S. Highway 90, thence along U.S. Highway 90 to Beaumont, thence along U.S. Highway 69 to Woodville, thence along U.S. Highway 190 to junction U.S. Highway 75, thence along U.S. Highway 75 to the point of beginning, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Oklahoma on and west of U.S. Highway 75 (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park) *.

(6) Between points in that part of Texas bounded by a line from Dallas, Tex., along U.S. Highway 80 to the Arkansas-Texas State line, thence along the Arkansas-Texas State line to U.S. Highway 84, thence along U.S. Highway 84 to junction U.S. Highway 69, thence along U.S. Highway 69 to junction U.S. Highway 175, thence along U.S. Highway 175 to the point of beginning, on the one hand, and, on thé other, points in that part of Oklahoma on and west of Oklahoma Highway 99 (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park) *; (7) Between points in that part of Texas bounded by a line from Dallas, Tex., along U.S. Highway 80" to the Texas-Arkansas State line, thence along the Texas-Arkansas State line to U.S. Highway 67, thence along U.S. Highway 67 to point of beginning, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Oklahoma on and west of U.S. Highway 77 (Iowa Park, Tex.; and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park)*; (8) Between points in that part of Texas bounded by a line from the Oklahoma- Texas State line along U.S. Highway 69 south to Dallas, Tex., thence along U.S. Highway 67 to the Arkansas-Texas State line, thence along the Arkansas-Texas and the Oklahoma-Texas State line to point of beginning, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Oklahoma on and west of U.S. Highway 183 (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park, Tex.) *; (9) Between points in Louisiana, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Oklahoma on and west of Oklahoma Highway 99 (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park) *.

(10) Between points in that part of Louisiana on and south of U.S. Highway 90, on the one hand, and, on the other, points hi that part of Oklahoma on and west of tJ.S. Highway 69 (Iowa Park, Tex., and points' in Texas within 100 miles Of Iowa Park) *; (11) Between points in Lea and Eddy Counties, N. Mex„

on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Texas on and east of a line beginning at the Oklahoma-Texas State line and extending along Texas Highway 83 south to Texas Highway 6, thence along Texas Highway 6 to Waco, thence along U.S. Highway 77 to junction Texas Highway 36, thence along Texas Highway 36 to Freeport (except Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park) (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park)*; (12) Between points in Lea and Eddy Counties, N. Mex., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Louisiana (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park) *; (13) Between points in Louisiana, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Missouri on and west of U.S. Highway 65 (points in Texas) *; (14) Between points in Missouri, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Louisiana bounded by a line beginning at the Arkansas- Louisiana State line and extending along U.S. Highway 79 to Minden, thence along Louisiana Highway 7 to Coushatta, thence along U.S. Highway 71 to Alexandria, thence along U.S. Highway 167 and U.S. Highway 90 to Morgan City, thence along the Lower Atchafalaya River to the Gulf of Mexico, thence along the Gulf of Mexico to the Louisiana-Texas State line, thence along the Louisiana- Texas State line to the Arkansas-Louisi- ana State line, thence along the Arkansas-Louisiana State line to the point of beginning (points in Texas)*; (15) Between points in that part of Louisiana bounded by a line beginning a t Alexandria, and extending along Louisiana Highway 1 to Grand Isle, thence along the Gulf of Mexico to the Lower Atchafalaya River, thence along the Lower Atchafalaya River to Morgan City, thence along U.S. Highway 90 to Lafayette, thence along U.S. Highway 167 to the ppint of beginning, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Missouri on, west, and north of U.S. Highway 63 from the Missouri-Arkansas State line to Rolla, and thence along U.S. Highway 66 east to the Missouri-Illinois State line (points in Texas) *.

(16) Between points in that part of Louisiana bounded by a line beginning at the Arkansas-Louisiana State line and extending along U.S. Highway ,165 to Monroe, thence along Louisiana Highway 15 to the Mississippi River, thence along the Mississippi River to Port Allen, thence along Louisiana Highway 1 to Alexandria, thence along U.S. Highway 71 to Coushatta, thence along Louisiana Highway 7 to Minden, thence along U.S. Highway 79 to Arkansas-Louisiana State line; thence along the Arkansas-Louisiana State line to the point of beginning, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Missouri on, west, and north of U.S. Highway 65 from the A rkansas-Missouri State line to Springfield, thence along U.S. Highway 66 to Lebanon, thence along Missouri Highway 5 to Camdenton, thence along U.S. Highway 54 to the Missouri-Illinols State line

(points in Texas) *; (17) Between points in that part of Louisiana bounded by a line beginning a t Port Allen, thence along UB. Highway 190 east to the Louisiana-Mississippi State line, thence along the Louisiana-Mississippi State line to the Gulf of Mexico, thence along the Gulf of Mexico west and south of Grand Isle, thence along Louisiana Highway 1 north to the point of beginning, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Missouri on and west of Missouri Highway 5 from the Arkansas- Missouri- State line to Lebanon, thence along U.S. Highway 66 to Rolla, thence along U.S. Highway 63 to Jefferson City, thence along U.S. Highway 54 to Mexico, thence along Missouri Highway 22 to junction Missouri Highway 19, thence along Missouri Highway 19 to the Missouri-Illinois State line (points in Texas) *; (18) Between points in that part of Louisiana on and west of U.S. Highway 167 from the Arkansas-Louisiana State line to Lafayette, thence along U.S. Highway 90 to Morgan. City, thence along the Lower Atchafalaya River to the Gulf of Mexico, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Illinois (points in Texas) *.

(19) Between points in that part of Louisiana bounded by a line beginning at the Arkansas-Louisiana State line and extending along the Mississippi River to Port Allen (including Baton Rouge and its commercial zone), thence along Louisiana Highway 1 to Grand Isle, thence along the Gulf of Mexico and the Lower Atchafalaya River to Morgan City, thence along U.S. Highway 90 to Lafayette, thence along U.S. Highway 167 to the Louisiana -Arkansas State line,

, thence along the Louisiana-Arkansas State line to the point of beginning, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Illinois on, north, and west of U.S. Highway 36 from the Missouri-Illinois State line to Springfield, thence along U.S, Highway 66 to Chicago (points in Texas) *; (20) Between points in Kansas, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Arkansas on, north, and east of U.S. Highway 64 from the Arkansas-Oklahoma State line to Little Rock, thence along U.S. Highway 65 to the Arkansas-Louisiana State line (points in Missouri)*; (21) Between points in Arkansas, on the one handr and, on the other, points in that part of Kansas on, north, and east of U.S. Highway 40 from the Colorado-Kansas State line to U.S. Highway 283, thence along U.S. Highway 283 to Ness, City, thence along Kansas Highway 96 to junction Kansas Highway 99, thence along Kansas Highway 99 to the Kansas-Oklahoma State line (points in Missouri) *; (22) Between points in Lea and Eddy Counties, N. Mex., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Kansas on and east of UB. Highway 75 (points in Missouri) *; (23) Between points in Arkansas, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Cimarron, Texas, Beaver, Harper, Ellis, Woods, and Woodward Counties, Okla. (points in Missouri) *.

(24) Between points in that part of Oklahoma bounded by a line beginning


NOTICES 49845

at the Oklahoma-Kansas State line and extending along Oklahoma Highway 99 to junction U.S. Highway 66, thence along U.S. Highway 66 to Tulsa, thence along U.S. Highway 75 to junction U.S. Highway 270, thence along U.S. Highway 270 to Oklahoma City, thence along Interstate Highway 35 to junction Oklahoma Highway 33, thence along Oklahoma Highway 33 to junction Oklahoma Highway 99, "thence along Oklahoma Highway 99 to the Oklahoma-Kansas State line, thence along the Oklahoma- Kansas State line to the point of beginning, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Arkansas on and east of U.S. Highway 65 from the Arkansas-Missouri State line to U.S. Highway 62, thence along U.S. Highway 62 to junction U.S. Highway 63, thence along U.S. Highway 63 to the Arkansas- Tennessee State line (points in Missouri)*; (25) ^Between points in that part of Oklahoma bounded by a line beginning a t the Kansas-Oklahoma State line and extending along Oklahoma Highway 99 to junction Oklahoma Highway 33, thence along Oklahoma Highway 33 to junction U.S. Highway 270, thence along U.S. Highway 270 to junction U.S. Highway 281, thence along U.S. Highway 281 to the Kansas-Oklahoma State line, thence along the Kansas-Oklahoma State line to the point of beginning, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Arkansas on, north, and east of Arkansas Highway 16 from the Arkansas-Oklahoma State line to junction Arkansas Highway 21, thence along Arkansas Highway 21 to junction U.S. Highway. 64, thence along U.S. Highway 64 to junction U.S. .Highway 65, thence along U.S. Highway 65 to the Arkansas-Louisiana State line (points in Missouri) *.

(26) Between points in that part of Oklahoma on, south, and west of U.S. Highway 60 from the Oklahoma-Texas State line east to Selling, thence along U.S. Highway 270 to junction Oklahoma Highway 33, thence along Oklahoma Highway 33 to junction Interstate Highway 35, thence along Interstate Highway 35 to Oklahoma City, thence along U.S. Highway 277 to junction U.S. Highway 81, thence along U.S. Highway 81 to the Oklahoma-Texas State line, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Arkansas on and north of Arkansas Highway 16 from the Arkansas-Oklahoma State line to U.S. Highway 64, thence along U.S. Highway 64 to the Arkansas-Tennessee State line (points in Missouri) *; (27) Between points in Louisiana, on the one hand,' and, on the other, points in that part of Kansas on and west of Kansas Highway 99 from the Kansas-Oklahoma State line to Emporia, thence along U.S. Highway 50 to junction U.S. Highway 75, thence along U.S. Highway 75 to the Kansas-Nebraska State line (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 Poles' of Iowa Park, and points in Oklahoma) *; (28) Between points in that part of Louisiana bounded by the Sabine River on the west, U.S. Highway 84 ou the north, the Mississippi River on

the east, and U.S. Highway 90 on the south, on the one hand, and, on the other, points * in Kansas (except Cherokee, Crawford, and Bourbon Counties, Kans.) (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas jvithin 100 miles of Iowa Park, and points in Oklahoma) *; (29) Between points in that part of Louisiana on and south of U.S, Highway 90, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Kansas (except Cherokee and Crawford bounties, Kans.) (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park, and points in Oklahoma) *.

(30) Between points in Kansas, on _the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Texas bounded by a line from the Qklahoma-Texas State line extending along U.S. Highway 75 to Dallas, thence along U.S. Highway 175 to Jacksonville, thence along U.S. Highway 69 to Rusk, thence along U.S. Highway 84 to the Louisiana-Texas State line, thence along the Louisiana-Texas State line, the Gulf of Mexico, and the United States-M;exico International Boundary line to Presidio, thence along U.S. Highway 67 and Texas Highway 17 to Pecos, thence along U.S. Highway 285 to the New Mexico-Texas State line, thence along the New Mexico-Texas State line to junction U.S. Highway 60, thence along U.S. Highway to junction Texas Highway 86, thence along Texas ^Highway 86 to the Red River, thence along the Red River east to the point of beginning (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park, and points in Oklahoma)*; (31) Between points in that part of Texas west of U.S. Highway 285 from the New Mexico-Texas State line south to Pecos, thence along Texas H ighw ay^ and U.S. Highway 67 to Presidio, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Kansas on and west of U.S. Highway 77 (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park, and points in Oklahoma) *; (33) Between points in that part of Texas bounded by a line from the Oklahoma-Texas State line along U.S. Highway 77 south to Port Worth, thence along U.S. Highway 377 to Stephensville, thence along U.S. Highway 281 to Lampasas, thence along U.S. Highway 183 to Austin, thence along UJ5. Highway 81 to San Antonio, thence along U.S. Highway 181 to Corpus Christi, thence along the Gulf of Mexico to Brownsville, thence along the United States-Mexico International Boundary line north to Del Rio, thence along U.S. Highway 277 to the Oklahoma-Texas State line, and thence along the Oklahoma-Texas State line to the point of beginhing, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in that part of Arkansas on and north of U.S. Highway 62 from the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line east to Jonesboro, thence along Arkansas Highway 18 east to the Arkansas-Tennessee State line (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park, points in Oklahoma, and points in Missouri) *.

(34) Between points in that part of Texas on and west of U.S. Highway 277, on the one hand, and, on the other,

points in that part of Arkansas on and north of Arkansas Highway 16 from the Arkansas-Oklahoma State line east to U.S. Highway 64, and thence along U.S. Highway 64 to the Arkansas-Tennessee State line (Iowa Park, Tex., and points in Texas within 100 miles of Iowa Park, points in Oklahoma, and points in Missouri) *. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateways indicated by asterisks above.

No. MC 124211 (Sub-No. E34), filed April 22, 1974. Applicant: HILT TRUCK LINE, INC., P.O. Box_ 988 D. T. S., Omaha, Nebr. 68101. Applicant’s representative: Thomas L. Hilt (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Food products (except commodities in bulk, dairy products, frozen foods, and meats, meat products, and meat byproducts, and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described by the Commission) , from points in Oklahoma to points in Minnesota (except those in Winona, Fillmore, Houston, and Olmsted Counties) , and from points in Oklahoma (except those in Craig, Ottawa, Mayes, and Delaware Counties), to pQints in Winona, Fillmore, and Houston Counties, Minn.), restricted to the transportation of shipments destined to points in the above- described destination territory. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Lincoln, Nebr.

No. MC 125433 (Sub-No. E9), filed March 5, 1975. Applicant: F-B TRUCK LINE COMPANY, 1945 South Redwood Road, Salt Lake City, Utah 84104. Applicant’s representative: David J. Lister, (same as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Iron and steel articles, as described in Appendix V Ex Parte No. MC-45, Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209, and 61 M.C.C. 766, from points in Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, and Imperial Counties, Calif., and points in that part of San Bernardino County, beginning a t the Califomia-Nevada State line, thence along Interstate Highway 15 to Barstow, thence along California Highway 18 to junction California Highway 247, to junction California Highway 62, to the San Bernar- dino-Riverside County line, to points in Oregon and Washington. The purpose of-this filing is to eliminate the gateway of Kaiser, California.

No. MC 126899 (Sub-No. El) filed February 3, 1975. Applicant: USHERTRANSPORT, INC., P.O. Box 3051, Paducah, Ky. 42001. Applicant’s representative: George M. Catlett, Suite 703- 706 McClure Building, Frankfort, Ky. 40601. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Petroleum products, as described in Appendix XIH to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209, in bulk, in tank vehicles, (1) from Memphis, Tenn., to points in that part of Illinois on and east of a line beginning a t the


49S46 NOTICESUlinols-Kentucky State line, thence along Illinois Highway 3 to junction Illinois Highway 144, thence along Illinois Highway 144 to Murphysboro, HI., thence along Illinois Highway 13 to Harrisburg, HI., thence along U.S. Highway 45 to junction Illinois Highway 1, thence along Hlinois Highway 1 to Crossville, HI., and thence along U.S. Highway 460 to the Illinois-Indiana State line; points in that part of Indiana on and south of U.S. Highway 460; and points in that part of Missouri bounded by a lino beginning at Crystal City, Mo., and extending along U.S. Highway 67 to Farmington, Mo., thence along Missouri Highway 32 to St. Genevieve, Mo., and thence along the Mississippi River to the point of beginning, serving all points on the indicated portion of U.S. Highway 67. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateways of Paducah, Ky., and points within 10 miles thereof and River Terminal at Berd’s Point, Mo.

No. MC 128256 (Sub-No. E l), filed September 8,1975. Applicant: BLOSSER TRUCKING, 215 N. Main St., Middle- burg, Ind. 46540. Applicant’s representative: Sheldon Silverman, 1819 H St., N.W., Suite 550, Washington, D.C, 20006. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Composition board in mixed loads with plywood, from the plant site of the Abitibi Corporation at Chicago, HI., to points in South Carolina, those in Virginia on, south, and east of a line at the North Carolina-Virginia State line, and extending along U.S. Highway 221 to junction U.S. Highway 29, thence along U.S. Highway 29 to junction U.S. Highway 60, thence along U.S. Highway 60 to the Atlantic Ocean, those in Georgia on and east of a line beginning at the South Carolina-Georgia State line and extending along Georgia Highway 368 to junction Georgia Highway 77, thence along Georgia Highway 77 to junction TLS. Highway 278, thence along U.S. Highway 278 to junction Georgia Highway 15, thence along Georgia Highway 15 to junction U.S. Highway 319, thence along U.S. Highway 319 to junction U.S. Highway 129, thence along U.S. Highway 129 to junction Georgia Highway 125, thence along Georgia Highway 125 to junction Georgia Highway 31, thence along Georgia Highway 31 to the Georgia-Florida State line, and those in Florida (except those west of Jefferson County, Fla.). The purpose of this filing is to elimiiiate the gateway of the plant site and warehouse facilities of the Abitibi Corporation near Roaring River, N.C.

No. MC 128383 (Sub-E87),<rfiled August 1, 1974. Applicant: PINTO TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., 1414 Calcon Hooh Road, Sharon Hill, Penn. 19079. Applicant’s representative: Gerald K. Gim- mel, 303 N. Frederick Ave., Gaithersburg, Md. 20760. Authority sought to operate as a comition carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) General commodities (except commodities in bulk, Classes A and B explosives and commodities requiring

special equipment) restricted to the transportation of shipments having an immediately prior or subsequent movement by air, between Kansas City International Airport, Kansas City, Mo., and Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn., on the one hand, and, on the other, John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York" City, N.Y. (2) General Commodities (except commodities in bulk, Classes A and B explosives and commodities requiring special equipment) restricted against the transportation of aircraft engines and parts from LaGuardia Airport and Newark Airport and restricted to the transportation of shipments having an immediately prior or subsequent movement by air, between Kansas City International Airport, Kansas City, Mo., and Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn., on the one hand, and, on the other, LaGuardia Airport and Newark Airport.(3) General commodities (except commodities in bulk, Classes A and B explosives, and commodities requiring special equipment) restricted to the transportation of shipments having an immediately prior or subsequent movement by air, between Philadelphia International Airport, Philadelphia, Pa., cm the one hand, and, on the other, Kansas City International Airport and Minneapolis- St. Paul International Airport, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn. (4yGeneral commodities (except commodities in bulk, Classes A and B explosives, motor vehicles, and commodities requiring the use of special equipment) restricted to the transportation of traffic having an immediately prior or subsequent movement by air, between Kansas City International Airport, Kansas City, Mo., and Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn.,, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Atlantic, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Gloucester, and Salem Counties, N.J., points in Burlington County, N.J., south of Rancocas Creek, points in Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia Counties, Pa., and points in Bucks County, Pa., north and west of Pennsylvania Highway 232.

(5) General Commodities (except commodities in bulk, Classes A and B Explosives, household goods, as defined by the Commission and commodities requiring special equipment) restricted to the transportation of traffic having an immediately prior or subsequent movement by air, between Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, Minneapolis- St. Paul, Minn., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Delaware; and between Kansas City International Airport, Kansas City, Mo., on the one hand, and, on the other, Wilmington, Del. (6) General commodities (except commodities in bulk, Classes A and B Explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, and commodities requiring special equipment) restricted to the transportation of traffic having a prior or subsequent movement by air, between Kansas City International Airport, Kansas City, Mo., on the one hand, and, on the

other, Accomac and Northampton Coun- j ties, Va.; and between Minneapolis-St. I Paul International Airport, Minneapolis-1 St. Paul, Minn., on the one hand, and, j on the other, Chesterfield, Henrico, Han- ! ocer,- York, Isle of Wight, Nansemond, Accomac, and Northampton Counties! Va., and Richmond, Norfolk, Portsmouth! ■■ Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, Newport i News, and Hampton, Va. (7) General ] Commodities (except those of lyiusual value, Classes A and B Explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and those requiring special equipment) restricted to the transportation of traffic having a prior, or subsequent movement by air, between Minneapolis-St. Paul international Air-' port, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn., Kansas City International Airport, Kansas City, Mo., .on the one hand, and, on the other, Pike County, Pa. (8) General commodities (except commodities in bulk, Classes A and B Explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, and commodities requiring the use of special equipment)" restricted to the transportation of traffic having a prior or subsequent movement by air, between Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, Minneapolis - St. Paul, Minn., and Weir Cook Airport, a t or near Indianapolis, Ind.

(9) General commodities (except commodities in bulk, Classes A and B explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, and commodities requiring the use of special equipment) restricted to the transportation of traffic having a prior or subsequent movement by air, between Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn., and Kansas City International Airport, Kansas City, Mo., on the one hand, and, on the other, Logan International Airport, Boston, Mass. (10) General commodities (except Classes A and B explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and commodities requiring the use of special equipment), restricted to the transportation of traffic having an immediately prior or subsequent movement by air, between Detroit Metropolitan Airport, Detroit, Mich., on the one hand, and, on the other, Kansas City International Airport, Kansas City, Mo„ and Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateways of Hopkins International Airport, Cleveland, Ohio in (1) above; John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, N.Y., and the Hopkins International Airport, Cleveland, Ohio in (2) above; John F. Kennedy International Airport, New'York, N.Y., and Hopkins International Airport, Cleveland, Ohio in(3) above; John F. Kennedy In te rnational Airport, New York, N.Y., and Hopkins International Airport, Cleveland, Ohio in (4) above; John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, N.Y., and Hopkins Jhtemational Airport, Cleveland, Ohio in (5) above; Friendship International Airport, Anne Arundel County, Md., John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, N.Y., and


NOTICES 49847Hopkins International Airport, Cleve-

; land, Ohio in (6) above; John P. Kennedy International Airport, New York, NX, and Hopkins International Airport, Cleveland, Ohio in (7) above; O’Hare International Airport, Chicago, HI. in(8) above; John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, N.Y., and Hopkins International Airport, Cleveland, Ohio in (9) above; and O’Hare International Airport, in Chicago, HI., in (10) above;

No. MC 128383 (Sub-E88), filed June 26, 1974. Applicant: PINTO TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., 1414 Calcon Hooh Road, Sharon Hill, Penn, 19079. Applicant’s representative: Gerald K. Gim- mel, 303 N. Frederick Ave., Gaithersburg, Md. 20760. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) General Commodities (except Classes A and B Explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and commodities requiring special equipment) restricted against the transportation of aircraft engines and parts from John F. Kennedy International Airport, LaGuardia Airport, N.Y.C., N.Y., and Newark Airport, Newark, N.J., and restricted to the transportation of shipments having a prior or subsequent movement by air, between Logan International Airport on the one hand, and, on the other, Friendship International Airport, Anne Arun- del County, Md., Dulles International Airport, Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, Va., Washington National Airport, Gravelly Point, Va., LaGuardia Airport, N.Y.C., N.Y., and Newark Airport, Newark, N.J. (2) General Commodities (except commodities in bulk, Classes A and B Explosives, motor vehicle, household goods as defined by the Commission, and commodities requiring special equipment) and restricted to the transportation of shipments having a prior or subsequent movement by air, between Logan International Airport on the one hand, and on the other, points in A t lantic, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Gloucester, and Salem Counties, N.J., Points in Burlington County, N.J., south of Rancocas Creek, points in Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia Counties, Pa., and points in Bucks County, Pa., north and west of Pennsylvania Highway 232. (3) General.commodities (except commodities in bulk, Classes A and B Explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, and commodities requiring the use of special equipment) and restricted to the transportation of shipments having a prior or subsequent movement by air,, between Logan International Airport on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Delaware.

(4) General commodities (except Classes A and B Explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities In bulk, and those requiring special equipment) restricted to the

transportation of shipments having a prior or subsequent movement by air, between Logan International Airport, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Hanover, Henrico, Chesterfield, Isle of Wight, Nansemond, York, Roanoke, Franklin, Montgomery, Craig, Bedford, Botetourt, Accomack, and Northampton Counties, Va., and Richmond, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, Newport News, Hampton, Salem, and Roanoke, Va. (5) General commodities (except 'those of unusual value, Classes A and B Explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and those requiring special equipment) restricted to transportation of shipments having a prior or subsequent movement by air, between Logan International Airport, on the one

t hand, and, on the other, points in Allegheny, Erie, Pike, Washington, and

Wyoming Counties, Pa. (6) General commodities (except Classes A and B Explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and commodities requiring special equipment) restricted to the transportation of shipments having a prior or subsequent movement by air, between Logan International Airport, on the one hand, and, on the other, Weir Cook Airport, Indianapolis, Ind., Hopkins Airport, Cleveland, Ohio, and Vandalia Airport, Dayton, Ohio. (7) General commodities, (except Classes A and B explosives, household goods, as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and commodities requiring special equipment) restricted to the transportation of shipments having a prior or subsequent movement by air and restricted against the transportation of shipments moving to Miami International Airport a t or near Miami, Fla., which have a subsequent movement beyond Miami, Fla., in foreign commerce, between Logan International Airport, on the one hand, and, on the other, Miami International Airport, Miami, Fla., Hartsfield International Airport, a t or near Atlanta, Ga., and Douglas Municipal Airport at or near Charlotte, N.C.

(8) General commodities (except Classes A and B explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and commodities requiring special equipment) restricted to the transportation of shipments having a prior or subsequent movement by air between Detroit Metropolitan Airport, Detroit, Mich., Chicago O’Hare international Airport, on the one hand, and, on the other, Logan International Airport. The purpose of this filing is to eliminate the gateways of John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, N.Y. in (1) above; John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, N.Y. in (2) above; John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, N.Y. in (3) above; John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, N.Y. and Friendship International Airport, Anne Arundel County, Md. in(4) above;: John F. Kennedy Intema-

tional Airport, New York, N.Y. in (5) above; John F. Kemiedy International Airport, New Airport, New York, N.Y. in(6) above; John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, N.Y% in (7) above; John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York, N.Y. in (8) above.

By the Commission.[seal] Robert L. Oswald,


FOURTH SECTION APPLICATION FOR RELIEF

October 21, 1975.An application, as summarized below,

has been filed requesting relief from the requirements of Section 4 of the Interstate Commerce Act to permit common carriers named or described in the' application to maintain higher rates and charges at. intermediate points than those sought to be established at more distant points.

Protests to the granting of an application must be prepared in accordance with Rule 40 of the General Rules of Practice (49 CFR 1100.40) and filed within 15 days from the date of publication of this notice in the F ederal R egister.

FSA No. 43064—Joint Rail-Water Container Rates—United States Lines, Inc. Filed by United States Lines, Inc., (No. 10), for itself and interested rail carriers. Rates on general commodities, from rail carriers terminals at Portland, Oregon, Seattle, Washington, Sacramento, Stock- ton, Richmond, Los Angeles and Oakland, California, to ports in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Continental Europe, Mediterranean and Scandanavian Countries. Grounds for relief—Water competition. Tariff—United States Lines, Inc., tariff No. 20,1.C.C. No. 20, F.M.C. No. 82. Rates are published to become effective on November 19,1975.

By the Commission.[seal] R obert L. Oswald,


[Notice No. 100]MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER

PROCEEDINGS' O ctober 24, 1975.

Application filed for temporary authority under Section 210a(b) in connection with transfer application under Section 212(b) and Transfer Rules, 49 CFR Part 1132:

No. MC-FC-76076. By application filed October 16, 1975, MICHAEL GORDON, 434 South Arizona St., Dillon, MT 59725, seeks temporary authority to lease the operating rights of M. G. BOSTWICK AND GERALD H. BOSTWICK, doing business as BOSTWICK TRUCK LINES, P.O. Box 511, Dillon, MT 59725, under


49848-49880 NOTICES

section 210a(b). The transfer to MICHAEL GORDON, of the operating rights O f M. G. BOSTWICK AND GERALD H. BOSTWICK, doing business as BOSTWICK TRUCK LINES, is presently pending.

By the Commission.[seal] Robert L. Oswald,


[Notice No. 101]MOTOR CARRIER BOARD TRANSFER

PROCEEDINGS' ' October 24, 1975.

Synopses of orders entered by the Motor Carrier Board of the Commission pursuant to Sections 212(b), 206(a), 211, 312(b), and 410(g) of the Interstate Commerce Act, and rules and regulations prescribed thereunder (49 CPR Part 1132), appear below:

Each application (except as otherwise specifically noted) filed after March 27, 1972, Contains a statement by applicants

FEDERAL

that there will be no significant effect on the quality of the human environment resulting from approval of the application. As provided in the Commission’s Special Rules of Practice any interested person may file a petition seeking reconsideration of the following numbered proceedings on or before November 13,1975. Pursuant to Section 17(8) of the Interstate Commerce Act, the filing of such a petition will postpone the effective date of the order in that proceeding pending its disposition. The matters relied upon by petitioners must be specified in their petitions with particularity.

No. MC-FC-76140. By order entered October 20,1975 the Motor Carrier Board approved the transfer to Calico Transfer & Storage, Inc., Barstow, Calif., of the operating rights set forth in Certificate No. MC 135418 (Sub-No. 1), issued March 21, 1972, to Acil J. Jaggers and Carl E. Houghtoft, doing business as Calico Transfer & Storage, Barstow, Calif., authorizing the transportation of used household goods, between points in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, Calif.,, subject to certain restrictions.

REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 2 07 - FRiDAY, OCTGSIii

Robert M. Cole, P.O. Box 250, Davis, Calif. 95616, attorney for applicants.

[seal] Robert L. Oswald,Secretary.

[FR Doc.75-28744 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]

[Notice No. 102]MOTOR CARRIER BOARD TRANSFER

PROCEEDINGSNo. MC-FC-76156. By application filed

October 16, 1975, AMERICAN COACH LINES INC., 1725 W. River Dr., Stevens Point, WI, seeks temporary authority to lease the operating rights of RICHARD R. KOLLER, doing business as BLUE JAY COACHES, Stevens Point, WI, under section 210a (b). The transfer to AMERICAN COACH LINES INC., of the operating rights Of RICHARD R. KOLLER, doing business as BLUE JAY COACHES, is presently pending.

By the Commission.[seal] R obert L. Oswald,

Secretary.. [FR Doc.75-28745 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]


PART II:

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

EXPENDITURE OF CERTAIN FUNDS

Advisory Opinion

NOTICES 49883

federa l e l e c t io n c o m m is s io n[Notice 1975-64]

f x p e n d it u r e s o f c o r p o r a t e f u n d sBY HOST COMMITTEES FOR THE BENEFIT OF NATIONAL POLITICAL PARTY

Advisory OpinionThe Federal Election Commission an

nounces the publication today of Advisory Opinion 1975-47. The Commission’s opinion is in response to questions raised by individuals holding Federal office, candidates for Federal office and political committees, with respect to whether any specific transaction or activity by such individual, candidate, or political committee would constitute a violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, of Chapter 95 or Chapter 96 of Title 26 United States Code, or of sections 608, 610, 611, 613, 614, 615, 616, or 617 of Title 18 United States Code.

The Commission points out that this advisory opinion should be regarded as an interim ruling which is subject to modification by future Commission regulations of general applicability. In the event that a holding in the opinion is altered by the Commission’s regulations, the persons to whom the opinion was issued will be notified.

Advisory Opinio n 1975-47This advisory opinion is rendered under

2 U.S.C. 437f, in response to a request for an advisory opinion submitted by the Democratic National Committee which was published as AOR 1975-47 in the September 3,

1975 Federal Register (40 FR 40671). Interested parties were given an opportunity to submit written comments relating to the request.

The request asks the Commission to render a supplement to Advisory Opinion 1975-1, published in the Federal Register on July 15, 1975 (40 FR 29791). Specifically, the supplemental advisory opinion request asks for what purpose and under what conditions a “Host Contmittee” could expend funds, including funds received by it from local retail corporations as described in Advisory Opinion 1975-1, without violating the prohibitions of 18 U.S.C. 610. The request also asks whether such transactions constitute “expenditures” under 26 U.S.C. 9008(d).

The Commission stated, in Advisory Opinion 1975-1, that, in general, “private corporations are. precluded by 18 U.S.C. 610 from donating or providing at less than fair market value any of the services, benefits or uses of property described in paragraphs (1) through (7),” as set out in said advisory opinion. The Commission described, however, two situations which in the Commission’s opinion did not involve violations of Section 610. One of these related to “local corporations which are engaged at the retail level in business of supplying consumer goods or services to the public.” It was the Commission’s opinion that such local retail corporations might contribute funds to a local civil association, business league, Chamber of Commerce, real estate board, or board of trade which was ( 1 ) not organized for profit and no part of the earnings of which would inure to the credit of any shareholder or individual, and (2) the principal objective of which organization “must be the encouragement of that commerce which is necessarily entailed in the arrival of any major convention in the city where such local corporations are located.” The Commission’s view was that

such contributions were sufficiently akin to purchase transactions that they would not violate the prohibitions of 18 U.S.C. 610.

For purposes of this opinion the Commission assumes that a “Host Committee” is wihin the ambit of the non-profit organizations described above. Based on that assumption the Commission remains of the view that so long as the amount of the contribution by each local retail corporation to the Host Committee is not disproportionate to an expectation of a reasonable return by such retailer during the life of the convention no violation of 18 U.S.C. 610 will occur. Because the Commission’s concern lies with the source and amount of the contribution rather than with the nature of the expenditure by the Host Committee, the Commission has no objection to disbursements by such committee to defray the costs of the types of activities listed as items (1) through (7) in AO 1975-1 so long as the money is expended for convention-related (as opposed to Candidate- related) activities. Moreover, consonant with part B of AO 1975-1, such disbursements will not be attributable to the two million dollar limitation under which the national party committees operate. The above opinion is, of course, conditioned by the requirement that the Host Committee register with and report to the Commission, pursuant to the provisions of Title 2, United States Code, as if it were a political committee.

This advisory opinion is issued on an interim basis only pending promulgation by the Commission of rules and regulation or policy statements of general applicability.

Dated: October 17, 1975.N e i l S t a e b l e r ,

Vice-Chairman for the Federal Election Commission.

[FR Doc.75-28404 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]



PRIVACY ACT OF1974

VARIOUS AGENCIES

49886

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Office.of the Secretary

PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 Systems of Records

Notice is hereby given of an additional routine use for USDA/FmHA-1, Applicant/Borrowers or Grantee File. This routine use was inadvertently omitted when the system notice was originally published in the F ederal R egister. 40 FR 38923 (August 27, 1975).

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a (e) (11) interested persons are invited to submit written comments on this routine use. Comments may be submitted to:. Director, Research and Operations Division, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250. All comments must be received on or before November 25,1975.

In consideration of the foregoing, notice is hereby given of the addition of the following routine use to USDA/FmHA-1, Applicant/Borrowers or Grantee File: Referral to employees, businesses, landlords, creditors or others to determine repayment ability and eligibility for FmHA programs.

Dated: October 20,1975.Earl L. B utz,


PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 Systems of Records

On August 27, 1975, a document was published in the F ederal R egister (40 FR 38897) proposing to adopt the notice of systems of records required by the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a). Interested persons were given the opportunity to submit, not later than September 17, 1975, written comments on these proposed notices.

No comments were received within the comment period. Certain changes are required, however, to correct printing errors in the publication of these notices. Accordingly, with changes as noted below, the proposed notices are adopted as published at 40 FR 38897.

1. In system notices USDA/ASCS-1 through USDA/ASCS-12, and USDA/ ASCS-31: A comma and the phrase “USDA/ASCS” is inserted at the end of each system name.

2. In system notice USDA/ASCS-15: “USDA/* *CS-15” is changed to read “USDA/ASCS-15”.

3. In system notice USDA/ASCS-22: The system name is changed to read “Power of Attorney and Designated Agents, USDA/ASCS”.

4. In system notice USDA/CSRS-2: The seventh word under the paragraph entitled System manager (s) and address

NOTICESis changed from “Reports” to “Programs”.

5. In system notice USDA/ERS-2: A comma and the phrase “USDA/ERS” is inserted at the end of the system name.

6. In system notice USDiA/FAS-1: “SDA/FAS-1” is changed to read “USDA/FAS-1”. In addition the first half of this system notice was omitted; therefore the paragraphs entitled System name; System location; Categories of individuals covered by the system; Categories of records in the system; Authority for maintenance of the system; Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of uses and the purposes of such uses; Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, retaining, and disposing of the records in the system; and Storage, are set forth below:

System name. Applicant Files for Employment with International Organizations, USDA/FAS.

System location. International Organization Affairs, Foreign Agriculture Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 14th and Independence Avenue, Washington,D.C. 20250.

Categories of individuals covered by the system. U.S. Citizens who have applied for specific post or indicated an interest in employment with international organizations. Occasionally includes person who has been only suggested as a possible candidate by someone else.

Categories of records in the system. Resumes and/or employment application forms, solicited and unsolicited letters of recommendation, reference checks, interview notes, and correspondence with candidates: communications to and from U.S. Missions and International organizations concerning applicant’s candidacy; letters of referral to and from Federal Agencies and other recruitment sources and users.

Authority for maintenance of the system. 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 CFR 2.68.

Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purposes of such uses. Resume or application referred to international organizations and other Federal Agencies involved in the recruitment of candidates for international organizations. Referral in rare instances made when private foundations or other Federal Agencies request assistance in locating specialized candidates.

Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, retaining, and disposing of records in the system—Storage. Records are maintained in file folders at the address listed above.

7. In system notice USDA/OGC-5: The phrase “01234” is deleted from the 5th line of the paragraph Notification procedure; and the entire last sentence (beginning “HP Any individual * * *”) is deleted. A new paragraph, Record access procedures, is added to read as follows: Any individual may obtain information as to the procedures for gaining access to a record in the system which pertains to him, by submitting a written request to the system manager.

8. In system notice USDA/OGC-19: A comma and the phrase “USDA/OGC” is inserted at the end of the system name.

9. In system notice USDA/QGC-58: The last sentence under the paragraph entitled Categories of records in the system (beginning “HG 16 U.S.C. * * *”) is deleted, and a new paragraph entitled Authority for maintenance of the system, is inserted to read as follows: 16 U.S.C. 590a-590f and 1001-1011; 5 U.S.C. 301; 44 U.S.C. 3101; 7 CFR 2.31.

10. In system notice USDA/OMF-3: The phrase “/not routine uses within meaning of Privacy Act” is deleted from the paragraph entitled Routine uses of records maintained in the system.

Effective date: September 27, 1975.Done at Washington, D.C., this 20th

day of October 1975.Earl L. Butz,



Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management

PRIVACY ACT OF 1974Proposed Amendment of Notice of Systems

Of RecordsThe Department of Health, Education,

and Welfare proposes that the following routine use be added to all of its notices of systems of records:

Disclosure may be made to a congressional office from the record of an individual in response to an inquiry from the congressional office made at the request of that individual.

Accordingly, disclosures may be made as provided under subsection (b) (3) of the Act without the written consent of the individual ,t6 whom the record pertains where the individual requests assistance of a -congressional office which would entail disclosure of information from a system of records pertaining to that individual.

Consideration will be given to comments which are submitted in writing on or before November 24, 1975.

Comments should be addressed to the Director, Fair Information Practice Staff, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 330 Independence Avenue S.W., Washington, D.C. 20201. Comments received will be available for inspection in Room 4513, at the above address.

Dated: October 20, 1975.John Ottina,

Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management.

[FR Doc.75-28627 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]




Office of the Secretary [ 49 CFR Part 10 ]

[Docket No. 39, Notice No. 75-10]PRIVACY ACT OF 1974

Maintenance of and Access to Records Pertaining to Individuals-Exemptions

The Department of Transportation proposes to amend Part 10 of Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, to exempt additional systems of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a). The systems of records proposed to be exempted consist of investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes; investigatory material compiled for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility or qualifications for Federal civilian employment, military service, Federal contracts or access to classified material; material specifically authorized to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy; and testing or examination material used to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal service.

It is proposed to amend paragraph (a) of § 10.61,-General exemptions, to read as follows:§ 10.61 General exemptions.

(a) The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with regard to the Investigations Division, the Federal Aviation Administration, with regard to the police functions of the Natiohal Capital Airport Police, the U.S. Coast Guard, with regard to the Intelligence and Security Division, and the Federal Railroad Administration, with regard to the Alaska Railroad Special Agents, may exempt from any part of the Act and this part, except subsections (b), (c) (1) and (2),(e)(4)(A) through (f), (e) (6), (7), (9),(10) and (11), and (i) of the Act, and implementing §§ 10.33,10.23 (a) and (b), 10.21(d) (1) through (6), 10.81, 10.83, and 10.85, any system of records, or portion thereof, which it maintains which consists wholly of:

(1) Information compiled for the purpose of identifying individual criminal offenders and alleged offenders and consisting only of identifying data and notations of arrests, the nature and disposition of criminal charges, sentencing, confinement, release, and parole and probation status;

(2) Information compiled for the purpose of a criminal investigation, including reports of informants and investigators, and associated with an identifiable individual: or

(3) Reports identifiable to an individual compiled at any stage of the process of enforcement of the criminal laws from arrest or indictment through release from supervision.

* * * *

In Appendix I, Exemptions, it is proposed to amend:

(1) Section I, General Exemptions, by

adding a'paragraph (c) and revising the last sentence, to read as follows:

1. General exemptions. * * *c. Intelligence and Security Investigative

Case Systems (DOT/CG 611), maintained by the Intelligence and Security Division, U.S. Coast Guard, at headquarters and district offices.

The purpose of these exemptions is to prevent the compromise or impairment of criminal investigations conducted by the Office of Investigations and Security, OST, the Airport Police Branches, and the Investigations and Security Division, USCG.

2. In section II, Specific exemptions:a. Subsection A is amended to read as

follows:n . Specific exemptions. A. The following

systems of records are exempt from subsection (c) (3) (Accounting of Certain Disclosures), (d) (Access to Records), (e)(4) (G), (H), and (I) (Agency Requirements), and (f) (Agency Rules) of 5 USC 552a, to the extent that they contain investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, in accordance with 5 USC 552a(k) (2) :

1. Investigative Record System maintained by the Federal Aviation Administration at FAA Regional and Center Air Transportation Security Divisions, the Investigations and Security Division, Aeronatuical Center; and Office of Investigations and Security, FAA Headquarters, Washington, D.C.

2. FHWA Investigations Case File System, maintained by the Office of Program Review and Investigations, Federal Highway Administration.

3. FHWA. Motor Carrier Safety Proposed Civil and Criminal Enforcement Cases, maintained by the Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety, Federal Highway Administration. »

4. Recreational Boating and Law Enforcement Cases. (DOT/CG 505), maintained by the Office of Boating Safety, U 5. Coast Guard.

5. Port Safety Reporting System—Individual Violation Histories (DOT/CG 561), maintained by the Office of Marine Environment and Systems, U.S. Coast Guard.

6. Marine Pollution Ca«e Files (DOT/CG 583), maintained by the U.S. Coast Guard.

7. Merchant Vessel Casualty Reporting System (DOT/CG 590), maintained by the Office of Merchant Marine Safety, U.S. Coast Guard.

8. U.S. Merchant Seaman’s Records (DOT/ CG 589), maintained by the Office of Merchant Marine Safety, U.S. Coast Guard.

9. Intelligence and Security Investigative Case Systems (DOT/CG 611), maintained by the Office of Operations, U.S. Coast Guard.

10. Port Security Case System (DOT/CG 612), maintained by the Office of Operations, U.S. Coast Guard-

11. DOT/NHTSA Investigations of Alleged Misconduct or Conflict of Interest, maintained by the Associate Administrator for Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The purpose of these exemptions is to protect investigatory materials compiled for law enforcement purposes. Disclosure of such material would hamper law enforcement by prematurely disclosing the knowledge of illegal activity and the evidentiary basis for possible enforcement actions.

b. Subsection B is amended by adding new paragraphs 3 and 4 and revising the last sentence, to read as follows:

3. Administrative Action and Legal Enforcement System (DOT/FAA), maintained by the Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration.

4. Investigations Record System, maintained by the Investigations Division, Office of Investigations and Security, Office of the Secretary.

The purpose of these exemptions is to prevent the compromise or impairment of law enforcement investigations by alerting individuals that they are the subject of Investigation, and to prevent the disclosure of the identity of sources of information promised confidentiality, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).

c. New subsections D, E, and F are added, to read as follows:

D. Those portions of the following systems of records consisting of investigatory material compiled for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for Federal civilian employment, military service, or access to classified information or used to determine potential for promotion in the armed services, are exempt from sections (c)(3) (Accounting of Certain Disclosures), (d) (Access to Records), (e) (4) (G), (H) and (I) (Agency Requirements), and (f) (Agency Rules) of 5 USC 552a to the extent that disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who provided information to the Government under an express or, prior to September 27, 1975, an implied promise of confidentiality (5 USC 552a(k) (5) and (7) ) :

1. Investigations Record Systems, maintained by the Investigations Division, Office of Investigations and Security, Office of the Secretary.

2. Intelligence and Security Investigative Case System (DOT/CG 611), maintained by the Office of Operations, U.S. Coast Guard.

3. Officer Selection and Appointment System (DOT/CG 625), maintained by the Office of Personnel, U.S. Coast Guard.

4. Official Officer Service Records (DOT/ CG 626), maintained by the Office of Personnel, U.S. Coast Guard.

5. Enlisted Recruiting Selection Record System maintained by the Office of Personnel, U.S. Coast Guard.

6. Officer, Enlisted, and Recruiting Selection Test Files (DOT/CG 628), maintained by the Office of Personnel, U.S. Coast Guard.

7. Enlisted Personel Record System, (DOT/ CG 629), maintained by the Office of Personnel, U.S. Coast Guard.

8. Coast Guard Personnel Security Program (DOT/CG 633), maintained by the Office of Personnel, U.S. Coast Guard.

9. Official Coas't Guard Reserve Service Record System (DOT/CG 676), maintained by the Office of Reserve, U.S. Coast Guard.

10. Investigative Record System, maintained by the Federal Aviation Administration at FAA Regional and Center Air Transportation Security Divisions; the Investigations and Security Division, Aeronautical Center; and Office of Investigations and Security, Headquarters, Washington, D.C.

The purpose of these exemptions is to prevent disclosure of the identities of sources who provide information to the government concerning the suitability, eligibility or qualifications of individuals for Federal civilian employment, contracts, access to classified information, or appointment or promotion in the armed services, and who are expressly or, prior to September 27, 1975, impliedly promised confidentiality (5 U.S.C. 552a(k) (5) and (7)).

E. Those portions of the following systems of records consisting of testing or examination material used solely to determine individual qualifications for. appointment or promotion in the Federal Service are exempt from subsections (c) (3) (Accounting of Certain Disclosures), (d) (Access to Records), (e)(4) (G), (H) and (I) (Agency Requirements) , and (f) (Agency Rules) of 5 U.S.C. 552a;

1. Officer, Enlisted and Recruiting Selection Test Files (DOT/CG 628), maintained by the Office of Personnel, U.S. Coast Guard.


49888 PROPOSED RULES2. Official Coast Guard Reserve Service Rec

ord System (DOT/CG 676) i maintained by thg Office of Reserve, U.S. Coast Guard.

The purpose of these exemptions is to preserve the value of these records as impartial measurement standards for appointment and promotion within the Federal service.

F. Those portions of the following systems of records which consist of information properly classified in the interest of national defense or foreign policy.In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(b) (1) are exempt from sections(c ) (3) (Accounting of Certain Disclosures),(d) (Access to Records), (e)(4) (G), (H) and (I) (Agency Requirements), and (f) (Agency Rules) of 5 U.S.C. 552:

1. Investigations Records System maintained by the Investigations Division, Office of Investigations and Security, Office of the Secretary.

2. Personnel Security Records System, maintained by the Office of Investigations and Security, Office of the Secretary.

The purpose of these exemptions is to prevent the disclosure of material authorized to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1) and 552a(k)(l).

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views or comments. Communications should identify the docket number and be submitted to the Docket Clerk, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 20590. Comments received on or before October 31, 1975, will

be considered in preparation of the final rules. Copies of all written comments received will be available for examination by interested persons during regular business hours in the Office of the General Counsel, Room 10424, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20590.

This notice of proposed rulemaking is issued under the authority of the Privacy Act <5 U.S.C. 552a) and 5 U.S.C. 553.

Issued in Washington, D.C. on October 20, 1975.

William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary.

[FR Doc.75-28665 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49889Table of Contents

ERDA 1 Alien visits and participation—ERDA

ERDA 2 Applications and reference checks for overseas employment with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)—ERDA

ERDA 3 ERDA Personnel—Appraisal and Development Records—ERDA

ERDA 4 Census of High Energy Physicists—ERDA

ERDA 5 Clearance Board Cases Administrative Review and Personnel—ERDA

ERDA 6 Compensation for Contractor Employees (25,000 dollars or more)—ERDA

ERDA 7 Consultants to ERDA Contractors—(Directory of)—ERDA

ERDA 8 Security Correspondence File—ERDA

ERDA 9 Discrimination Complaint Files—ERDA

ERDA 10 Employment and Financial Interests—ERDA

ERDA 11 ERDA Personnel—Supervisor Records—ERDA

ERDA 12 ERDA Personnel Applicant Records— ERDA

ERDA 13 ERDA Contractor Employee Insurance Claims—ERDA

ERDA 14 ERDA Technology Training Program—Skill T r a in in g at Technician Level— ERDA

ERDA 15 ERDA Personnel/General. Employment Records—(Addendum to the U.S. Civil Service Commission Federal Register Notice of Records reporting CSC-General Personnel Folder and Related Records)—ERDA

ERDA 31 Personnel Records of Former and Present Contractor Employees—ERDA

ERDA 32 Personnel Security Clearance Files—ERDA

ERDA 33 Personnel Security. Clearance Index—ERDA

ERDA 35 Security Education and/or Infraction Reports—ERDA

ERDA 36 Special Access Authorization for Categories of Classified Information—ERDA

ERDA 31 Statistical Analysis Using Personnel Security Questionnaire (Mancuso Study)—ERDA

ERDA 38 Employee and Visitor Access Control Record—ERDA

ERDA 39 Weapon Data and Weapons Program Facilities—Access to—ERDA

ERDA 40 Nationwide Traineeship Reporting System—ERDA

ERDA 41 Travel Files—ERDAERDA 1

System name:Alien visits and participation—ERDA

System location:U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration

(Headquarters)Washington, D.C. 20545

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114

U-S. Energy Research and Development Administration Los Alamos Area Office 528 35th StreetLos Alamos, New Mexico 64141

ERDA 16 FHA Insured Loans (Certificates of Eligibility)—ERDA

ERDA 17 Firearms Qualifications Record—ERDA

ERDA 18 Investigations Pertaining to Violations of Law and Losses of Security Interest—ERDA

ERDA 19 Foreign Travel—ERDA

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Dayton Area Office P.O. Box 66Miamisburg, Ohio 45342

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401

ERDA 20 Government Driver’s License File—ERDA

ERDA 21 Investigative Files—ERDA

ERDA 22 Labor Standards Complaints and Grievance Files—ERDA

ERDA 23 Legal Office—Claims, Litigations, Criminal Violations, Patents, and other Legal Files—ERDA

ERDA 24 Medical History System—ERDA and Contractor Employees—ERDA

ERDA 25 Nuclear Qualification Examination Records (for personnel to be assigned to ships, shipyards and prototypes)—ERDA

ERDA 26 Occupational and Industrial Health and Safety Records—ÈRDA

ERDA 27 Payroll and Leave—ERDA

ERDA 28 Payroll and pay related data for employees of terminated contractors—ERDA

ERDA 29 Personnel Assurance Records—ERDA

ERDA 30 Personnel radiation exposure information—ERDA

U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801

U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 1069Schenectady, New York 12301

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Naval Reactor Office P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122

U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94612

U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box E

FEDERAL REGISTER VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

49890 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439

Categories of individuals covered by the system:Resident aliens who visit and participate at Energy Research

and Development Administration Offices and Energy Research and Development Administration contractor facilities.

Categories of records in the system:Federal Agencies Indicies checks and Energy Research and

Development Administration records regarding Alien visits and participation at Energy Research and Development Administration offices and/or contractor facilities.

Authority for maintenance of the system:PUB. L. 93-438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended

(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)

Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purposes of such uses:

Government Agencies with Military, Intelligence, or Law Enforcement Responsibilities—Investigative purposes and to refer, where there is an indication of a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in nature, to the appropriate agency charged with the responsibility otinvestigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.

Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, retaining, and disposing of records in the system:

Storage: Paper file, retrieved manuallyRetrievability: Indexed chronologically, name and visit numberSafeguards: Access limited to employees with need-to-know;

stored in security areas under guard and/or alarm protectionRetention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities

are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate.

System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Safeguards and Security,U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C. 20545 has been designated the Agency

System Manager for this system. The managers and directors of field locations listed under notification below are designated system managers for their respective portions of this system.

Notification procedure: a. U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Privacy Act Administration Officer’s Mail Addresses: '

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration (Headquarters)

Washington, D.C. 20545

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115


U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114 .

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office

P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801


b. Required Identifying Information: indicate full name, nationality; and, date and location of visit.

Record access procedures:Refer to Notification Procedure.

Contesting record procedures:Refer to Headquarters.

Record source categories:Individual; reports from Federal Investigation Agencies

conducting indices investigations; and, letters and/or plans from Energy Research and Development Administration Operating office, operating Divisions and Energy Research and Development Administration contractor facilities.

Systems exempted from certain provisions of the act: The Administrator has exempted this system from subsections (c)(3),(d),(e)(1),(e)(4)(G),(H),(I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This exemption applies only to information in this system of records which is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k) (1), (2) and(5). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 111, Part 708, to be published in FEDERAL REGISTER.

ERDA 2System name:

Applications and reference checks for overseas employment with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)—ERDA



Categories of individuals covered by the system:U.S. citizens interested in employment with International

Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria Categories of records in the system:

Education, employment history, salary and personal reference checks

Authority for maintenance of the system:Executive Order 10422, Executive Order 11552, PUB. L. 93-

438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93- 473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


U.S. Mission to IAEA, Vienna and other governmental agencies interested in foreign programs. Evaluation prior to offers of employment IAEA—Evaluation prior to offers of employment plus selection for employment. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper filesRetrievability: Name, specialty, IAEA organizational designation


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49891Safeguards: Maintained in safes, access is limited to personnel of

IAEA Branch and Office of Assistant Director for Agreements and Liaison.

Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate..

System manager(s) and address:The Director Division of International Programs,U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency

System Manager for this system.Notification procedure:

a. U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Privacy Act Administration Officer’s Mail Addresses:



b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, field of specialization, and time period.



Record source categories:Individuals seeking employment, references, and references

and information provided by knowledgeable agency personnel.

ERDA 3System name:

ERDA Personnel—Appraisal and Development Records—ERDA



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.6. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bartlesville Energy Research Center Box 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003


U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationGrand Forks Energy Research CenterUniversity StationGrand Forks, North Dakota 58201

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Junction Office P.O. Box 2567Grand Junction, Colorado 81501


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Laramie Energy Research Center P O. Box 3395 University Station Laramie, Wyoming 82070

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center

Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Energy Research Center 4800 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122





Categories of individuals covered by the system:All Energy Research and Development Administration

employeesCategories of records in the system:

Supervisor-employee appraisal, by name of employee, of performance, preparation of development plans, and, for employees GS-13 and above a determination potential for executive positions


(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). Public Law 85- 507, Executive Order 11348

_ Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purposes of such uses: No outside use. For, additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: On Paper Form ERD 622. Some older records on ERDA Form 625.

Retrievability: Alphabetic by name Safeguards: Usually in file cabinetRetention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities

are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “ Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate.

System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Personnel U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency

System Manager for this system. The Managers and Directors of the field locations listed under Notification



below are designated the System Managers for then- respective portions of this system.

Notification procedure:a. U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration,

Privacy Act Administration Officer’s Mail Addresses:




U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bartlesville Energy Research Center Bo* 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administartion Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439



U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationLaramie Energy Research CenterP.O. Box 3395University StationLaramie, Wyoming 82070

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505






U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office .P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801


Record source categories:From the supervisor and employee during the annual review,

informatiion is documented bn the ERDA Form 622 or 625.ERDA 4

System name:Census of High Energy Physicists—ERDA



Categories of individuals covered by the system:Scientists and graduate students in the field of high energy

physicsCategories of records in the system:

Name, date of birth, education, employment history, research support agencies, technical specialities.


(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L/93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


Physicists, research organizations and various government organizations engaged in physics research—to obtain information on individuals and organizations engaged in high energy physics research. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Magnetic tapeRetrievability: Alphabetical by name, employer or any other com

bination of dataSafeguards: Access limited to Division of Physical Research Per

sonnel, maintained in locked file cabinet in secured building.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System manager(s) and address:The Director,Division of Physical Research,U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency





b. Required Identifying Information: Requestor should provide his full name, and education (Degree, date and University).



Record source categories:High energy physics research group leaders and laboratory

directors. Other personnel in field of high energy physics.ERDA 5

b. Required Identifying Information: Location(s), full name, social security number, date of birth, and time period.


System name:Clearance Board Cases Administrative Review and

Personnel—ERDA System location:


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49893U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration

(Headquarters), Washington, D.C. 20545.


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Monsanto Research Corporation, Mound Laboratory Miamisburg, Ohio 45342


Categories of individuals covered by the system:Employees, access permittees, consultants and prospective

employees of the Energy Research and Development Administration and Energy Research and Development Administration contractors and access permit holders.

Categories of records in the system:Results of investigation concerning individuals processed for

access authorizations (clearances).Authority for maintenance of the system:

PUB. L. 93-438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


Personnel involved in Administrative Review—Information used for reference during review board hearings. Federal Law Enforcement and Investigative Agencies—To refer, where there is an indication of a violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in nature, to the appropriate agency, whether Federal, state, or local, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper file manually retrieved; also maintained on magnetic tape at Oak Ridge office.

Retrievability: Indexed by name.Safeguards: Access limited to employees having need-to-know;

stored in security areas under guard and/or guard protection.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities

Me contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning. or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate.

System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Safeguards and Security U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency

System Manager for this system. The managers and directors of field locations listed under Notification below are designated system managers for their respective portions of this system.





Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, date of birth, social security number, clearance processing location, and time period.

Record access procedures:Refer to Notification Procedure. '


Record source categories:Personnel Security Questionnaire and Fingerprint Card

executed by individual; background investigation reports by Federal Bureau of Investigation, Civil Service Commission and other Government agencies conducting background investigations; summaries and transcripts of interviews with the individual; transcripts of Administrative Review Board hearings with individual; correspondence to individual concerning administrative processing of clearance action and local and State police agency reports.

Systems exempted from certain provisions of the act: The Administrator has exempted this system from subsections (c)(3),(d),(e)(1),(e)(4)(G),(H),(I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This exemption applies only to information in this system of records which is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k) (1), (2) and(5). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 111, Part 708, to be published in FEDERAL REGISTER.

ERDA 6System name:

Compensation for Contractor Employees (25,000 Dollars or More)—ERDA








U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box 0Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830




U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P-O. Box E

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 1069



Schenectady, New York 12301



Categories of individuals covered by the system:Administrative, Professional, Scientific personnel.

Categories of records in the system:Name, contractor, salary history, and current salary.

Authority for maintenance of the system:PUB. L. 93-438J42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended

(42 U.S.C. 226l), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U,S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et. seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


No outside uses. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA. Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, retaining,

and disposing of records in the system:Storage: File cabinets in mail and file room.Retrievability: Alphabetically by name, usually on paper. Safeguards: Records kept in file cabinets in guarded buildings. Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities

are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix, 0230, Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill as appropriate.

System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Labor Relations U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency

System Manager for this system. The Managers and Directors of the field locations listed under Notification below are designated the System Managers for their respective portions of this system.







U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Idaho Operations Office 550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401 -



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550

Richland, Washington 99352



b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, location of last employment, and time period.



Record source categories:From contractor salary administrative personnel.

ERDA 7System name:

Consultants to ERDA Contractors—(Directory of)—ERDA System location:




U S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439



U.S, Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114



U S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352




RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49895U.s. Energy Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors Office p.O. Box 1069Schenectady, New York 12301

Categories of individuals covered by the system:Consultants to ERDA Contractors

Categories of records in the system:Biographical notes, personal data/correspondence, employment

history, education, salary/total compensation, area of specialization, contractual arrangements and duration, service provided and research support.

Authority for maintenance of the system:PUB. L. 93438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended

(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93 409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 ILS.C. 661 et seq.)

Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purposes of such uses: No external users. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: PaperRetrievability: Indexed chronologically, alphabetically by contrac

tor, alphabetically by consultant name.Safeguards: Secure and guarded building—access on need-to-

know basis, combination locked files, locked file cabinets Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System managers) and address:The Director, Division of Labor Relations U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency



Prvacy Act Administration Officer’s Mail Addresses:











<b. Required Identifying Information: Full name of consultant,

name of contractor, area of contract work performed, and time period.



Record source categories:Reports from individuals, contractors, and Dun and Bradstreet.

ERDA 8System name:

Security Correspondence File—ERDA System location:



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Los Alamos Area Office 528 35th StreetLos Alamos, New Mexico 87544

Categories of individuals covered by the system:Individual of interest to Energy Research and Development

Administration officials.Categories of records in the system: _

Correspondence received from individuals; news media; and, informational reports.




Federal Law Enforcement and Investigative Agencies—To refer, where there is an indication of a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in nature, to the appropriate agency charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper file manually retrieved.Retrievability: Indexed by name.Safeguards: Access limited to individuals having need-to-know;

stored in security area under guard protection.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System managers) and address:The Director, Division of Safeguards and Security U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency

System Manager for this system. The Managers and Directors of the field locations listed under Notification below are designated the System Managers for then- respective portions of this system.








b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, date of birth, social security number, and time period.



Record source categories:Individual and official records; news media; and, organizations.

Systems exempted from certain provisions of the act:Administrator has exempted this system from subsections

(c)(3),(d),(eXl), (e)(4)(G),(H),(I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This exemption applies only to information in this system of records which is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k) (1), (2) and (5). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 111, Part 708, to be published in EEDERAL REGISTER.

ERDA 9System name:

Discrimination Complaint Files—ERDA System location:











U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Nevada Operations Office

P.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114








Categories of individuals covered by the system:Each ERDA employee, ERDA contractor employee, or

Assigned Facilities contractor employee who has filed a written complaint of discrimination based on race, religion, national origin or sex with ERDA or with another Federal agency which has referred the complaint to ERDA.

Categories of records in the system:The complaint, investigative reports and related

correspondence.Authority for maintenance of the system:

Executive order 11246 PUB. L. 93-438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93- 577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.),Executive Order 11478 PUB. L. 92-261.


Other federal state and local agencies—for purposes of considerations of charges, claims or appeals.CSC (Respecting complaints by ERDA Employees)—Equal Employment Opportunity enforcement purposes. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Department of Labor and State Fair Employment Commissions (Respecting complaints by contractor employees)—Equal employment opportunity enforcement purposes. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.

Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, retaining,and disposing of records in the system:

Storage: Paper filesRetrievability: By name of complainantSafeguards: Stored in locked files in guarded buildings, with ac

cess only to those personnel involved in processing the complaint.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System managers) and address:The Director, Office of Equal OpportunityU.S. Energy Research and Development Administration

FEDERAL REGISTER VOL. 40, NO. 207—FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49897Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency






U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O.Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115




U.S- Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401

b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, and time period.



Record source categories:Information is derived from personnel and payroll records and

from interviews with ERDA and contractor employees.ERDA 10

System name:Employment and Financial Interests—ERDA


(Headquarters)Office of the General Counsel Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office Office of the Chief Counsel P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee ,37830U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationChicago Operations OfficeOffice of the Chief Counsel9800 South Cass AvenueArgonne, Illinois 60439

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Junction Office Office of the Chief Counsel P.O. Box 2567Grand Junction, Colorado 81501





U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Energy Research Center 4800 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616


U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations OfficeOffice of the Chief Counsel550 2nd StreetIdaho''Falls, Idaho 83401

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office Office of the Chief Counsel P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352U.S. Energy Research and Envelopment AdministrationSan Francisco Operations OfficeOffice of the Chief Counsel1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo BuildingOakland, California 94616U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeOffice of die Chief CounselP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office Office of the Chief Counsel P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office Office of the Chief Counsel P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors Office Office of the Chief Counsel P.O. Box 1069Schenectady, New York 12301



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office Office of the Chief Counsel P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Los Alamos Area Office Office of the Area Counsel 180 6th StreetLos Alamos, New Mexico 87544

Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Nevada Operations Office tP.O. Box 14100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89114

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Kansas City Area Office P.O. Box 202Kansas City, Missouri 64141

Categories of individuals covered by the system:ERDA staff personnel (employees, consultants, advisors)

whose positions involve activities actioii or decisions having an economic impact on any non-Federal enterprise.

Categories of records in the system:Contains the name, position title, date of appointment;

employment and financial interests; creditors; interests in real property; names and addresses of other persons requested to supply information; individual’s certificate of* truth and veracity.


(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq ), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), EO 11222

Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purposes of such usds:

Cognizant appointing officials—To assist the Agency, CSC and the President in determining whether individuals have conflicts or apparent conflicts of interest in the performance of official duties; for counselling personnel in avoiding violations; for assignment of duties; law enforcement

Counsel within the Agency and Department of Justice—Prosecution or determination as to law enforcement. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.

Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, retaining, and disposing of records in die system:

Storage: Paper files.Retrievability: Indexed by nameSafeguards: Maintained in 3 way combination locked filing

cabinetsRetention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities

are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill as appropriate.

System manager(s) and address:The General Counsel, ERDA—Headquarters U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency



Privacy Act Administration Officer’s Mail Addresses:U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration

(Headquarters)Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801b. Required Identifying Information: Individual’s name, ERDA

location of last employment or cognizant office, and time period.



Record source categories:Individual on whom the record is maintained.

ERDA 11System name:

ERDA Personnel—Supervisor Records—ERDA System location:


Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office <P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bartlesville Energy Research Center Box 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationGrand Forks Energy Research CenterUniversity StationGrand Forks, North Dakota 58201U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Junction Office P.O. Box 2567Grand Junction, Colorado 81501U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401

FEDERAL REGISTER VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 197S

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49899

U.s. Energy Research and Development AdministrationLaramie Energy Research Centerp.O. Box 3395University StationLaramie, Wyoming 82070U.S. Engergy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505

U.S. Energy Research Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Energy Research Center 4800 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office’P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors Office

! P.O. Box 1061Schenectady, New York 12301

Categories of individuals covered by the system:Current employees; in a few cases, records include former

employees, assigned military personnel, or applicants Categories of records in the system:

The contents vary from office to office, but include all or some of the following: copies and summaries of employment history, job descriptions, education, address, next of kin, phone number, date of birth, awards and commendations received, participation in professional or community activities, training,.earnings and leave data, travel actions, certification or qualification examinations, injury reports, appraisals, copy of ADP-produced Form ERDA-702, copy of Form ERDA-50, assignment records, security infraction notices, records of supervisory—employee discussions, reprimands, admonitions, adverse actions, contingency planning data, security clearance status, and government property in employee’s possession.



Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purposes of such uses: ERDA internal use only, for additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper Retrievability: By nameSafeguards: In files under control of supervisory officialRetention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System managers) and address:The Director of Personnel, U.S. Energy Research and

Development Administration, Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency System Manager for this system. The cognizant supervisor personnel in the appropriate office and location listed under Notification if said personnel retain such records, are designated System Managers for their respective portions of this system.





U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bartlesville Energy Research Center Box 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass AvenueArgonne, Illinois 60439 ,,


U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationLaramie Energy Research CenterP.O. Box 3395University StationLaramie, Wyoming 82070

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Nevada Operations Office P.O. Box 14100 .Las Vegas, Nevada 89114U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Energy Research Center 4800 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213


FEDERAL REGISTER VO l. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

49900 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIONU.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801 ~b. Required Identifying Information: Complete name, and, if

appropriate, the geographic location(s), organization(s), the name of the supervisor where requester believes such records may be located, and the time period.


Contesting record procedures:Refer to Headquarters

Record source categories:The greatest majority of the data comes directly from the

individuals or cognizant supervisory official; other data comes from copies of personnel action document.

Systems exempted from certain provisions of the act:The Administrator has exempted this system from subsections

(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), (D, and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This, exemption applies only to information in this system of records which is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5) and (6). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 111, Part 708, to be published in FEDERAL REGISTER.

• ERDA 12System name:

ERDA Personnel Applicant Records—ERDA System location:


Washington; D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office - P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bartlesville Energy Research Center Box 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationGrand Forks Energy Research CenterUniversity StationGrand Forks, North Dakota 58201U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Junction Office P.O. Box 2567Grand Junction, Colorado 81501U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationLaramie Energy Research CenterP.O. Box 3395University StationLaramie, Wyoming 82070U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Box 880

Morgantown, West Virginia 26505

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

( U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Energy Research Center 4800 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 1061Schenectady, New York 12301

Categories of individuals covered by the system:Individuals applying for, or inquiring about, employment with

ERDACategories of records in the system:

Standard Form 171, “Personal Qualifications Statement”; letters of inquiry and general applications; resumes of personal data, education, and work experience; personnel evaluation forms; completed reference check letters or forms; interview summary sheets; education, military and employment history statements.; correspondence related to recruitment, application and employment; test records and academic transcripts (as appropriate); other documents related to application and employment.


(42 U.S.C. 221), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U?S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


Key operating officials and supervisors (includinjg military personnel assigned to ERDA or directly associated with the naval or military application functions of ERDA—Referrals of applicants, evaluation of qualifications and selection of candidates under consideration for employment, or in. other activities directly concerned with their official responsibilities.

Colleges and Universities participating in the ERDA recruiting program—Performance of regular practices in placement of students and in receiving information concerning evaluation or selection of their graduates.

Other Government Investigative Agencies—In the event these records indicate a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal or regulatory in nature, and whether


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49901arising by general statute or particular program statute, or by regulation, rule or order issued pursuant thereto, the relevant records in the system of records may be referred, as a routine use, to the appropriate agency whether federal, state, local or foreign, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation or order issued pursuant thereto. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper and punched cardsRetrievability: Occupational category, name, date, register

number; in college recruitment files, retrievable by education institution’s name

Safeguards: Physical security varies: usually administratively-controlled access to authorized personnel in a locked and guarded bidding or in locked file cabinets.

Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate.

System managers) and address:The Director of PersonnelU.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency



Privacy Act Adihinistration Officer’s Mail Addresses:U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration

(Headquarters)Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bartlesville Energy Research Center Box 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Aigonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Forks Energy Research Center University Stationn Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationLaramie Energy Research CenterP.O. Box 3395University StationLaramie, Wyoming 82070U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 83401






b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, social security number, date of birth, occupational category and location at which application or other material was submitted; in case of college recruitment material, applicable college or university name; and time period.



Record source categories:• Individuals seeking, or referred for, employment; personal

references provided by individuals; personnel administrators, officials, assistants, and other staff; interviewers; current and former employers, teachers, supervisors, and other government agencies; Congressmen, testing officials, State Employment Service; and educational institutions


(cX3), (d), (eXl), (eX4XG), (H), (I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This exemption applies only to information in this system of records which is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5) and (6). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 111, Part 708, to be published in FEDERAL REGISTER.

ERDA 13System name:

ERDA Contractor Employee Insurance Claims—ERDA System location:


Washington, D.C. 20545 Categories of individuals covered by the system:

Claimants under Workmen’s Compensation Insurance, Third party claimants against ERDA contractors.

Categories of records in the system:Accident reports, physician statements, pictures, maps,

sketches, claimant and witnesses statements, doctors and hospital bills, reports from engineering firms, claims activity reports.




Insurance companies—In administering problem claims against ERDA contractors and ERDA. State and local agencies—for

FEDERAL REGISTER VO I. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

49902 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIONconsideration of insurance claims. Physicians—claim evaluation. Lawyers claim evaluation. State industrial commissions—claim evaluation. Claims—adjustment services firms—claim evaluation. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper, computer, printoutsRetrievability: By name, claim number.Safeguards: Locked building?Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities

are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill as appropriate.

System managers) and address:.The Director, Division of Labor Relations U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 2054S, has been designated the Agency


a. U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration,' Privacy Act Administration Officer’s Mail Addresses:



b. Required Identifying Information: Full name and time period.



Record source categories:From insurance company’s claim files and from claimants and

witnesses.ERDA 14

System name:ERDA Technology Training Program—Skill Training at

Technician Level—ERDASystem location:


Washington, D.C. 20545Oak Ridge Associated Universities Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box 117Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830


Storage: Paper and punched cards.Retrievability: Participants name.Safeguards: Guarded building.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System manager(s) and address:The DirectorDivision of Labor RelationsU.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency




(Headquarters)Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, training

program, and time period.Record access procedures:

Refer to Notification Procedure.Contesting record procedures:

Refer to Headquarters.Record source categories:

From individuals and contractors by whom the individual is employed.

ERDA 15System name:

ERDA Personnel/General Employment Records—(Addendum to the U.S. Civil Service Commission Federal Register Notice of Records reporting CSC-General Personnel Records (Official Personnel Folder and Related Records))—ERDA

System location: ,U.S. Energy Research iind Development Administration


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P. O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352


Categories of individuals covered by the system:Technician skill level training for industrial employers within

the energy industry, e.g., Construction, Electro/Mechanical Drafting, In h a la tion Toxicologists, Radiation Monitoring, Welding Inspection, Vacuum Technology, and/ASer and Optics Technology.

Categories of records in the system:Application for training assignment, work history, education,

training evaluation.Authority for maintenance of the system:


Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purposes of such uses: No outside use. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bartlesville Energy Research Center Box 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office ' ■./9800 South Cass Avenue Aigonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationGrand Forks Energy Research CenterUniversity StationGrand Forks, North Dakota 58201U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Junction Office P.Q. Box 2567Grand Junction, Colorado 81501


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49903U.s. Energy Research and Development Administration Idaho Operations Office 550 2nd Street 'Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401






U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122 .



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box A vAiken, South Carolina 29801


Categories of individuals covered by the system: Current and former employees, consultants, board members and applicants only to the extent they are considered for competitive selection.

Categories of records in the system:Official Personnel Folders (SF-66), Service Record Cards (SF-

7), records on suggestions and awards, training request and authorization data, training course evaluation statements, appraisals resulting from annual supervisor-employee review, pay requests and dispositions, reduction-in-force registers (including ssociated records of competitive levels and competitive areas), reemployment and repromotion priority lists, retirement associated eligibility and calculations, records on competitive selections (Form ERDA-178 and supporting documents), central copy of approved position descriptions, correspondence related to and copies of employee appeals, grievances, and complaints, including records of hearings or examiner’s reports, lists of separated employees, correspondence from employees requesting transfer or reassignment, average grade data, data related to and derived from the “Personnel Automated Records and Information System” (PARIS).

Authority for maintenance of the system:PV®T L. 93-438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended

(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.),

PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


Operating officials, supervisors, and administrative staff (Including military personnel assigned to ERDA or directly associated with the naval or military application functions of ERDA.) The employment and management of the personnel resources assigned to or considered for their organization, or in other activities directly concerned with their official responsibilities.

Federal Bureau of Investigation or other Federal investigative organizations—To refer, where there is an indication of a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal, orregulatory in nature, to the appropriate agency, whether Federal, state, or local, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto. Nuclear Regulatory Commission—Statistical and historical employment analysis. Congress; Office of Management and Budget—Agency employment and organization analysis. U.S. Civil Service Commission—Federal government employment, record keeping and reporting. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper, computer printouts, punched cards, mag-tape and disk, microfilm.

Retrievability: Name, Social Security Number.Safeguards: Locked file cabinets, controlled access rooms; com

puter center access-control to automated personnel data base; locked records and guarded buildings.


System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Personnel U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency








U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Forks Energy Research Center University Station Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201




U.s. Energy Research and Development AdministrationLaramie Energy Research CenterP.O. Box 3395University StationLaramie, Wyoming 82070U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.d! Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114.U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Energy Research Center 4800 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801b. Required Identifying Information: Complete name, and, if

appropriate, the geographic location(s) and organization(s) where requester believes such record may be located, social security number, date of birth, and time period.



Record source categories:Data comes directly from individual to whom it applies or is

derived from information he/she supplied, except in fo rm a tio n that is provided by agency officials and/or obtained from official personnel actions.


(CX3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4XG), (H), (I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This exemption applies only to information in this system of records which is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(kX5) and (6). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 111, Part 708, to be published in FEDERAL REGISTER.

ERDA 16System name:

FHA Insured Loans (Certificates of Eligibility)—ERDA System location:


Categories of individuals covered by the system: Persons having Certificates of Eligibility

Categories of records in the system: Employment and Loan Information

Authority for maintenance of the system:

National Housing Act, PUB. L. 93-438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93- 577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


Federal Housing Administration—For approval by area manager. (FHA) Personnel Processing of loan by FHA. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.

Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, „retaining, and disposing of records in the system:

Storage: Paper.Retrievability: Subject file, name.Safeguards: Kept in locked building.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System manager(s) and address:ManagerU.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office ,P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115, has been designated the

Agency System Manager for this system.Notification procedure:



b. Required Identifying Information: Full name of individual and time period.

Record access procedures:Refer to Notification Procedure. t


Record source categories:Individuals Involved, employer, real estate broker

ERDA 17System name:

Firearms Qualifications Record—ERDA System location:

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Amarillo Area Office Pantex Plant Amarillo, Texas 79105U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office \P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801



U.s. Energy Research and Development Administration Dayton Area Office Mound Laboratory Miamisburg, Ohio 45342

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Kansas City Area Office 2000 E. Bannister Road Kansas City, Missouri 64141

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administraton Los Alamos Area Office 528 35th StreetLos Alamos, New Mexico 87544


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pinellas Area Office GE Pinellas Peninsula St. Petersburg, Florida 33733

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Rocky Flats Area Office P.O. Box 92»Golden, Colorado 80401

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Sandia Area OfficeTechnical Area I, Kirtland Air Force Base-East Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administraton San Francisco Livermore Site Office Trailer 125, Room 106 Livermore, California 94550


Categories of individuals covered by the system:Energy Research and Development Administration employees

and Energy Research and Development Administration contractor employees who familiarize or qualify with firearms in performance of regular duties.

Categories of records in the system:Records of individual’s annual qualification scores; approval of

gun permits; accountability of firearms.Authority for maintenance of the system:


Routine uses of records m aintained in the system, including catego- nes of users and the purposes of such uses:

Wackenhut Services incorporated (Nevada) Training and Administrative Personnel—Performance of regular duties


System manager(s) and address: The Director, Division of Safeguards and Security

U.S. Energy Rsearch and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency

„ System Manager for this system. The Managers and Directors of the field locations listed under Notification below are designated the System Managers for their respective portions of this system.



(Headquarters)Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

U,S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616





Record source categories:Gun permit notifications and firearm qualifications results from

individual and training personnel.ERDA 18

System name:Investigations Pertaining to Violations of Law and Losses of

Security Interest—ERDA System location:


Washington, D.C. 20545Los Alamos County Sheriff—Deputation of individuals

Los Alamos County Clerk—Recording of Deputy Commission

Los Alamos District Court Clerk—Recording of Deputy Commission. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.

Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, retaining, disposing of records in the system:

Storage: Paper file manually retrieved.Retrievabilhy: Indexed chronologically and by name.Safeguards: Access limited to employees having need-to-know;

stored in security areas under guard and/or alarm protection.

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Los Alamos Area Office 528 35th Street



Los Alamos, New Mexico

U.S. Energy Research and Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Batavia Area Office P.O. Box 2000 Batavia, Illinois 60510

U.S. Energy Research and Idaho Operations Office 550 2nd Street

' Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401 Categories of individuals covered by the system:

Energy Research and Development Administration and ERDA contractor employees; private citizens.

Categories of records in the system:Reports to determine cause and circumstance of accidents

and/or incidents; and, traffic violators.Authority for maintenance of the system:



Federal, State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies—Tssso refer, where there is an indication of a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in nature, to the appropriate agency, whether Federal, state, or local, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto.

Civil Service Commission—Investigative purposes

64141

Development Administration /

Development Administration


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801b. Required Identifying Information: Indicate full name, date

of birth, employer, dates of employment and social security number.



Record source categories:Reports of investigations performed by Security, Fire, Safety

personnel; reports filed by local and State police departments; and, results of accident investigations and incidents.

ERDA 19System name:

Foreign Travel—ERDA System location:

U.S. Energy Research and Washington, D.C. 20545


Property Owners and Insurance Companies—Insurance claims

ERDA Contractor Fire and Safety and Administrative Personnel—Evaluation of fire and safety incidents. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper file manually retrieved; also on photographs and tape recordings at Batavia Office.

Rgtrievability: Indexed by name and chronologically.Safeguards: Access limited to individuals having need-to-know;

maintained in locked and guarded buildings.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System manager(s) and address: The Director, Division of Safeguards and Security

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationWashington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency




U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge,-Tennessee 37830U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Los Alamos Area Office 528 35th StreetLos Alamos, New Mexico 64141U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115


Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuqueque, New Mexico 87115


Categories of individuals covered by the system:Energy Research and Development Administration and ERDA

contractor employees traveling to foreign countries.


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49907i Categories of records in the system:

Security evaluation of individual’s access to classified information and background data relating to proposed foreign travel; travel itinerary and summary report following completion of travel.


(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 UJS.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


Law Enforcement and Intelligence Agencies—Post travel discussions. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper files, retrieved manually.RetrievabUity: Indexed by name and chronologically.Safeguards: Access limited to employees with need-to-know;

stored in guarded buildings.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System managers) and address: The Director, Division of Safeguards and Security

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency




The Administrator has exempted this system from subsections (c)(3),(d),(e)(1), (e)(4)(G),(H),(I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This exemption applies only to information in this system of records which is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k) (1), (2) and (5). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 111, Part 708, to be published in FEDERAL REGISTER.

ERDA 20System name:

Government Drivers License File—ERDA System location:




U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bartlesville Energy Research Center P.O. Box 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003.U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Junction Office P.O, Box 2567Grand Junction, Colorado 81501









U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration New Brunswick Laboratory

P.O. Box 150 New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administratiori U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationSan Francisco Operations Office Oak Ridge Operations Office1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building P.O. Box E „Oakland, California 94616 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

b. Required Identifying Information: Indicate full name, date of birth, employment location and dates of travel.

Record access procedures: Refer to Notification Procedure. Contesting record procedures:


Individual and employer of individual.Systems exempted from certain provisions of the ad:


U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationRocky Flats Area OfficeP.O. Box 928Golden, Colorado 80401

FEDERAL REGISTER VÔL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Laramie Energy Research Center P.O. Box 3395, University Station Laramie, Wyoming 82070U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 1069Schenectady, New York 12301U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352

Categories of individuals covered by the system:ERDA Personnel, U.S. Geological Survey Personnel,

Contractor Personnel, U.S. Forest Service Personnel, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Personnel

Categories of records in the system:Government Motor Vehicle'License Applications, Government

Motor Vehicle Operator’s Driving Record, Record of Tests, In v e st igatio ns pertaining to possible misuses of Government Equipment, and Vehicle Restrictions


(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) CSC Regulations, 40 U.S.C. 471.


National Safety Council and Military Personnel—Statistical, awards, determine qualifications for drivers license, Employee’s license hiy, managerial control

Contractors—Same as above and investigation of possible misuse of Government Equipment. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper and punched cardsRetrievability: Alphabetic by name, chronological by expiration

date, date of incident, and numeric by badge number Safeguards: Maintained in buildings with controlled access, com

bination file safe, and key lock file Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities

are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate.. System managerfs) and address: The Director of- Administrative Services

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.c. 20545, has been designated the Agency




(Headquarters)Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration . Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration

Bartlesville Energy Research Center Box 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Idaho Operations Office 550 2nd Street >Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box E vOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Laramie Energy Research Center P.O. Box 3395, University Station ,Laramie, Wyoming 82070b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, location(s) of

ERDA installation, where Government driver’s license was issued, and time period.



Record source categories:From individual, examining physician, or nurse, National

Driver Register, Department of Transportation, shipment security records and trip summaries, Safety Engineer, citizens observing misuse of government equipment, and police

ERDA 21System name:

Investigative Files—ERDA System location:


Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bartlesville Energy Research Center Box 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49909Argonne, Illinois 60439



U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idafio 83401




U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationOak Ridge Operations OfficeP.O. Box E :Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830





U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operation s Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 9801

U S. Energy Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 1069Schenectady, New York 12301

Resident Investigators, Office of Audit and Inspection, assigned at the following Operations Offices:

Albuquerque Operations Office Chicago Operations Office •Nevada Operations Office Oak Ridge Operations Office Richland Operations Office San Francisco Operations Office

Categories of individuals covered by the system:

Current and former ERDA and contractor employees who are subjects of investigations, and individuals involved in miscellaneous investigative matters.

Categories of records in the system:Investigative reports, memoranda, letters, and when applicable,

performance evaluation of the assigned investigator.Authority for maintenance of the system:



Federal, State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies—To refer, where there is an indication of a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in nature, to the appropriate agency, whether Federal, state, or local, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto.

General Accounting Office—Administrative evaluation of agency procedures, upon request.

Congress—Evaluation of agency procedures.

Individuals Who File-Discrimination Complaints Against ERDA—Review results of discrimination investigation.

ERDA Contractor Management Personnel on a Need to Know Basis—Administrative evaluation and action.

United States Department of Justice—Possible civil suits.Other Government Agencies—Evaluation with regard to

personnel clearance and suitability investigations, upon request.

Federal, State or Local Agencies Authorized Under the Civil Rights Act to Redress Equal Opportunity Complaints—Evaluation of investigations of discrimination complaints. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper files and card indicesRetrievability: By name and case numberSafeguards: Files are kept in at least key-locked cabinets, with

access on a need-to-know basis. Files may be disclosed outside the agency only with the approval of the Director, Office of Audit and Inspection.


System manager(s) and address: The Director, Office of Audit and Inspection

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationWashington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency



Privacy Act Administration Officer’s Mail Address:U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration


U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationAlbuquerque Operations OfficeP.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

FEDERAL REGISTER VOL. 40, NO. 207—FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 197S



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationGrand Forks Energy Research CenterUniversity StationGrand Forks, North Dakota 58201U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationI .aramie. Energy Research CenterP.O. Box 3395University StationLaramie, Wyoming 82070U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Box 880M organtow n, West Virginia 26505

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100 iLas Vegas, Nevada 89114U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Eneigy Research Center 4800 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 133 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, identity and

address of employer, and dates of employment.Record access procedures:



Information comes from ERDA and contractor records, employees of both, and other sources possessing information pertinent to an investigation.

Systems exempted from certain provisions of the act: The Administrator has exempted this system from subsections (cX3),(d),(eXl), (3X4XGXH),(I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This exemption applies only to information in this system of records which is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552s(k) (1), (2) and (5). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 111, Part 708, to be published in FEDERAL REGISTER.

ERDA 22System name:

Labor Standards Complaints and Grievance Files—ERDA System location:


Washington, D.C. 20545 vU.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Eneigy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616


Categories of individuals covered by the system:Current and former contractor employees.,

Categories of records in the system:Complaints against contractors, labor unions.


(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C, 5501 et seq.), , PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq ), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)

Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users ai d the purposes of such uses:

U.S. Dept, of Labor—Contract labor standards enforcement. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.

Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, retaining) and disposing of records in the system:

Storage: PaperRetrievability: By individual name, by case number.Safeguards: Locked files.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System managers) and address:The Director,Division of Labor Relations,U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration,

FEDERAL REGISTER VOL. 40, NO. 207—FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975V

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49911Washington, D.c. 20545, has been designated the Agency





- U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616b. Required IdenTifying Information: Contractor, union,

individual name, and time period.Record access procedures:



From contractors, public, individuals.ERDA 23

System name:Legal Office—Claims, Litigations, Criminal Violations,

Patents, and other Legal Files—ERDA System location:

U:S. Energy Research and Development Administration (Headquarters)





U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Forks Energy Research Center

University StationGrand Forks, North Dakota 58201U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Junction Office P.O. Box 2567Grand Junction, Colorado 81501U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationLaramie Energy Research CenterP.O. Box 3395University StationLaramie, Wyoming 82070U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505

U.S: Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114







U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors Office Post Office Box 1069 Schenectady, New York 12301

Categories of individuals covered by the system:ERDA related debtors and bankrupts; claimants-radiation, tort,

patent;claimants with respect to employees compensation and workmen’s compensation claims; radiation injury and other personal injury claims; property damage and other tort claims; patent claims and contract claims; injured parties, litigants and complaints generally; inventors; those against whom claims have been filed; persons suspected of violating criminal law.

Categories of records in the system:Claims of government against others; Administrative claims;

personal injury, radiation injury, property damage and other tort claims; contrac claims, litigation records, accident reports civil litigation; addendums to inspection reports, employment records consultants agreements, cases alledging discrimination, award, conflict of interest files, criminal



litigation records, Personal Security Review Board cases, medical recordsy photographs, telephone records, investigations, government orders, inventions and correspondence and other data relating to the foregoing.

Authority lor maintenance of the system:PUB. L. 93-438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended



Department of Justice, GAO, state and local law enforcement agencies; civil and criminal courts, administrative arbitrators, litigants, investigators, congress, attorneys, physicians, consultants, insurance carriers—For appraisal, evaluation, settlement and denial of claims and other matters and as a basis for advice by counsel and physiciians and as a basis for administrative and legal action and all matters pertaining thereto including civil and criminal remedies, law enforcement, disclosure when requesting information, and disclosure of requested information, maintenance of records. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: PaperRetrievability: Name and Control card locatorSafeguards: Records maintained in vault and locked safes under

surveillance during business hours, otherwise locked.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System managers) and address:The General Counsel, U.S. Energy Research and Development

Administration (Headquarters),Washington, D.C. 25045 has been designated the Agency system manager for this system. The Managers and Directors of the field locations listed under Notification below are designated System Managers for their respective portions of the system.



(Headquarters)Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bartlesville Energy Research Center Box 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationGrand Forks Energy Research CenterUniversity StationGrand Forks, North Dakota 58201U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationLaramie Energy Research CenterP.O. Box 3395University StationLaramiee, Wyoming 82070 '

U.S. Energy Research ariil Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Energy Research Center /4800 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801b. Required Identifying Information: Full name of individual;

approximate date of event, place of origin; category of record, cognizant office



Record source categories:From individuals, inspection reports, other agencies, Office of

General Councel attorneys and other agency officers and staff, contractors, investigators and auditors.


(cX3),(d),(e)(1), (e)(4XG),(H),(I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This exemption applies only to information in this system of records which is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k) (1), (2) and (5). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 111, Part 708, to be published in FEDERAL REGISTER.

ERDA 24System name:

Medical History System-ERDA and Contractor Employees—ERDA

System location:U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Kadlec Medical-Dental Building Richland, Washington 99352

*U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Idaho Operations Office 550 Second Street Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box E


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49913Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

U.S. Energy' Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors P.O. Box 1069*Office Schenectady, New York 12301

U.S. Energy Research and Development .Administration Los Alamos Area Office 528 35th StreetLos’Alamos, New Mexico 87544

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P. O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office - P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Naval Reactors Facility P. O. Box 2068 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83411

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory P.O. Box 79West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh- Energy Research Center 4800 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Kansas City Area Office 2006 E. Bannister Kansas City, Missouri

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Junction Office P.O. Box 2567Grand Junction, Colorado, 81501U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Industrial Medicine Division Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Dayton Area Office Mound Laboratory Miamisburg, OhioU.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Kansas City Area Office Bendix Corporation Kansas City, Missouri 64141

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center P.O. Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505

Categories of individuals covered by the system:Employees of ERDA and ERDA contractor personnel.

Categories of records in the system:Medical history on employee resulting from medical

examinations and radiation exposure. In case of injury, description of injury occurrence and treatment. In addition, medical records of periodic physical examinations; and pyschological testing, routine first aid, and other visits.

Authority for maintenance of the system:PUB. L. 93-438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as am(42

U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


Physicians, U.S. Department of Labor, various State’s Departments of Labor and Industries, and Contractors—to describe and record information as a result of periodic and physical examinations to ascertain suitability of an employee to a better job assignment with regard to health, and to maintain a record of occupational injuries or illnesses. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Computer printouts, magnetic tape, paper, microfilm.Retrievability: By name, Social Security number, plant area.Safeguards: Active records are maintained in locked file cabinet

in a locked building. Inactive records are maintained in locked storage vault. '

Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are_destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate.

System manager(s) and address:The Director,Division of Biomedical & Environmental Research,■U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency



Privacy Act Administration Officer’s Mail Addresses:U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationKnolls Atomic Power Laboratory Nevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 1073 P.O. Box 14100Sqhenectedy, New York 12301 Las Vegas, Nevada 89114U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationSan Francisco Operations Office Oak Ridge Operations Office1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building P.O. Box EOakland, California 94616 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830


I l

49914 RESEARCH ANÌD DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Energy Research Center 4800 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616

System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Naval Reactors,U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C. 20545 has been designatecLthe Agency


a. U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Privacy Act Administration Officer’s Main Addresses:


Washington, D.C. 20545b. Required Identifying Information: Name, position for which

examination taken and the approximate date of the exam.Record access procedures:

Refer to Notification Procedure.Record source categories:

From the individual to whom the records pertain.U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center P.O. Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505b. Required Identifying Information: Applicable location or

location or locations where individuai is or was employed, full name of requester, social security number, employees), and time period.



Record source categories:From individuals and employer payroll systems: Investigations

of accidents or illnesses: From individual and his personnel and Medical records: Physician performing the examination.

ERDA 25System name:

Nuclear Qualification Examination Records (for personnel to be assigned to ships, shipyards and prototypes)—ERDA


(Headquarters) rWashington, D.C. 20545

Categories of individuals covered by the system:Candidates for positions: U.S. Naval Nuclear ship commanding

officers, Engineering Officers, Naval nuclear prototype plant managers, Naval Reactors representatives, shipyard and prototype shift test engineers and operations supervisors and station operator.

Categories of records in the system:Completed examinations and associated records necessary to

locate the exams.Authority for maintenance of the system:

PUB L. 93-438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended (42 U.S.C. 22dl), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U-S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


DOD—Performance of regular duties. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: PaperRetrievability: Name and examination serial numberSafeguards: Access controlled by cognizant engineer.Retention and disposal: Records retention and. disposal authorities

are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 023d, Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate.

ERDA26System name:

Occupational and Industrial Health, and Safety Records—ERDA


(Headquarters).Washington, D.C. 20545U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationAmarillo Area OfficePantex PlantP.O. Box 1086Amarillo, Texas 79105U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Burlington Area Office P.O. Box 561 Burlington, Iowa 52601U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Dayton Area Office P.O. Box 66Miamisburg, Ohio 45342U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Kansas City Area Office P.O. Box 202Kansas City,, Missouri 64141U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Los Alamos Area Office 180 6th StreetLos Alamos, New Mexico 87544U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationPinellas Area OfficeP.O. Box 11500St. Petersburg, Florida 33733U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationRocky Flats Area OfficeP.O. Box 928Golden, Colorado 80401U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Brookhaven Office Upton, New York 11973

FEDERAI REGISTER VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Idaho Operations Office 550 Second Street Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Nevada Test Site Mercury, Nevada 89023


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Cincinnati Area Office P.O. Box 39188 Cincinnati, Ohio 45239

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration New Brunswick Laboratory P.O. Box 150 .New Brunswick, New Jersey

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationPaducah Area OfficeP.O. Box 1213Paducah, Kentucky 42001

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Portsmouth Area Office Piketon, Ohio 45661

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Puerto Rico Area Office P.O. Box BBHato Rey, Puerto Rico 00919 "A -


U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Branch OfficeP.O. Box 2469Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Shippingport Branch Office P.O. Box 11Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway Oakland, California 94612


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 1069

Schenectady, New York 12301

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration West Milton Field Office P.O. Box 1069Schenectady, New York 12301

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Windsor Field Office P.O. Box 393Windsor, Connecticut 06095

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationHealth and Safety Laboratory376 Hudson -StreetNew York, New York 10014

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Collins Ferry Road'Morgantown, West Virginia 26505

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Laramie Energy Research Center P.O. Box 3395, University Station Laramie, Wyoming 82070 \

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Forks Energy Research Center Box 8213, University Station Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Bartlesville Energy Research Center P.O. Box 1398Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003


Categories of individuals covered by the system:ERDA employees, contractor employees, and any other

persons having access to ERDA facDitis.Categories of records in the system:

Accident/incident information; occupational injury and illness experience; property damage experience; motor vehicle accidents




Physicians—For purpose of treating patients.Property owners and insurance companies—For purpose of

processing insurance claims.ERDA contractor safety and administrative

personnel—Evaluation of safety incidents.ERDA contractors and consultants. States* Departments of

Labor and Industries and other State Agencies, U.S. Department of Labor, National Drivers’ Registry, and Department of Transportation—for purposes of processing insurance claims and accident reporting. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Magnetic Tape, punch cards, paper, microfilm Retrievability: alphabetic, numeric, or alphanumeric code Medical

records and motor vehicle accident records—retrievable by name in the field organizations.

Safeguards: Locked file cabinets, locked safes, guarded areas, secured buildings.



Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “ Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate.

System manager(s) and address:The Director,Division of Operational Safety,U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency



Privacy ActAdministration Officer’s Mail Addressee



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, Ne\tf Mexico 87115





U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationLaraihie Energy Research CenterP.O. Box 3395University StationLaramie, Wyoming 82070






U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office

1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616


b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, social security number, and/or birth date, geographic location of the accident and time period.



Record source categories:Individual concerned,Individual’s supervisor,Medical Officer—personal physician,Accident investigator,Investigation Board,Investigating law enforcement officer,National Drivers Register,Previous employer records.

ERDA 27System name:

Payroll and Leave—ERDA fSystem location:

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Headquarters

Office of the Controller Washington, D.C. 20545

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operation Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

U.S. Energy Research Bnd Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue

. Argonne, Illinois 60439





U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Junction Office P.O. Box AGrand Junction, Colorado 81501


FEDERAL' REGISTER VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49917U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Nevada Operations Office P.O. Box 14100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89114

Categories of individuals covered by the system:ERDA Personnel and Consultants

Categories of records in the system:Time and attendance records, consultant earning records,

ERDA personnel earning records, payroll actions and deduction information, requests and authorizations for overtime/night defferential, and CSC retirement records


(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)ERDA PR 9- 7.5005-9 & 9-15.5010-14 (d), Title 5, 31 USC 66A, and Federal Personnel Manual 29631/ Federal Personnel Manual 293-31

Routine uses of records maintained in the system, in c lu d in g categories of users and the purposes of such uses:

Treasury Department—Collection of withheld taxes, printing payroll checks and issuing savings bonds

Internal Revenue Service—Federal Income Tax Processing State and Local Governments—State and Local Income Tax

processingCivil Service Commission—Retirement Records and Benefits Social Security Administration—Social Security Records and

BenefitsDepartment of Labor—Processing workmen’s compensation

claimsDOD-Military Retired Pay Offices—Adjusting of Military

RetirementSavings Institutions—Crediting accounts for savings made

through payroll deductionsEmployee Unions—Crediting Accounts for employees with

union dues deductionsHealth Insurance Carriers—To process insurance claims GAO-Audit—Verification o f accuracy and legality of

disbursementVeterans’ Administration—for evaluation of veteran’s benefits

to which the individual may be entitled.States’ Departments of Employment Security—for determining

entitlement to unemployment compensation or other State benefits. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper, punched cards, magnetic tape and disk, and microfiche

Retrievability: Individual Name (alphabetic), Social Security Number, chronologically, and Payroll number

Safeguards:1. Access to magnetic tapes and disk files is controlled through

established ERDA computer center procedures (personnel screening and physical security).

2. Locked cabinets and desks3. Access or need to know basis4. Secure building5. Safe

Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “Records Disposition.’’ Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate.

System manager(s) and address:The Controller,Office of the Controller,U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration

HeadquartersWashington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency

System Manager for this system.

The managers and directors of field locations listed under notification below are designated system managers for their respective portions of this system.




Washington, D.C. 20545 *


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Aigonne, Illinois 60439

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Idaho Operations Office 550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401 ,




U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo B uilding Oakland, California 94616


b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, social security number, location(s) of employment, and time period.



Record source categories:Individual; Division of Personnel; Personnel Certifying Time

and Attendance RecordsERDA 28

System name:Payroll and pay related data for employees of terminated

contractors—ERDASystem location:

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office Federal Record Center Seattle, Washington 99352


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office


49918 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIONP.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

Categories of individuals covered by the system: .All types of former contractor employees <

Categories of records in the system:Employee payroll data from terminated contractors,

employment history, job titles, complaints, salary reviews, etc.


(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seqO, PUB. L. 86-599 30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


U.S. Department of Labor—to determine compliance with Federal labor laws. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: PaperRetrievability: Alphabetical by name, some by subject matter.Safeguards: ERDA holding records area.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities

are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, ‘‘Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill as appropriate.

System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Labor Relations U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency

System Manager for this system. The Managers and Directors of the field locations listed under Notification below are designated the System Managers for their respective portions of this system. N



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration . Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

, P.O. Box 141000 Las Vegas, Nevada


Categories of individuals covered by the system:Employees performing critical duties.

Categories of records in the system:Results of medical examinations, employment review,

credit/consumer reports; and data for access authorizations (clearances).



Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purposes of such uses: No outside use. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: paper file manually retrieved Retrievability: indexed by nameSafeguards: access limited to employees having need-to-know;

stored in locked file cabinets in secured buildings Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Military Applications,U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration . (Headquarters)

Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency System Manager for this system. The Managers and Directors of the field locations listed under Notification below are designated the System Managers for their respective portions of this system.







b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, location(s) of employment, and time period.



Record source categories:From ERDA contractors.

ERDA 29System name:

Personnel Assurance Records—ERDA System location:


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Nevada Operations Office





Record source categories:Individual and supervisor.

ERDA 30System name:

Personnel radiation exposure information—ERDA System location:

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office



P.o. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationAmarillo Area OfficePantex PlantP.O. Box 1086Amarillo, Texas 79105

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Burlington Area Office P.O. Box 561 Burlington, Iowa 52601

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Dayton Area Office P.O. Box 66Miamisburg, Ohio 45342

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Kansas City Area Office P.O. Box 202Kansas City, Missouri 64141

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Los Alamos Area Office t528 35th StreetLos Alamos, New Mexico 87544

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pinellas Area Office P.O. Box 11500St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 _


U.S. Energy Research arid Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Brookhaven Office Upton, New York 11973


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Idaho Operations Office 550 Second Street Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Idaho Health Services Laboratory, CF-690 INEL and Computer Science Center Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Nevada Operations Office P. O. Box 14100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89114

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P. O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Cincinnati Area Office P. O. Box 39188 Cincinnati, Ohio 45239

TJ.S. Energy Research and Development Administration New Brunswick Laboratory P.O. Box 150

New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationPaducah Area OfficeP.O. Box 1213Paducah, Kentucky 42001

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Portsmouth Area Office Piketon, Ohio 45661

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Puerto Rico Office P.O. Box BBHato Rey, Puerto Rico 00919


U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Branch OfficeP.O. Box 2469Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Shippingport Branch Office P.O. Box 11Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway, Weis Fargo Building Oakland, California 94612



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration West Milton Field Office P. O. Box 1069Schenectady, New York 12301

U.S. Energy Research and Development A d m in is tra t io n Windsor Field Office P.O. Box 393Windsor, Connecticut 06095

U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationHealth and Safety Laboratory376 Hudson StreetNew York, New York 10014

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Hanford Environmental Health Foundation

Kadlec Medical-Dental Building Richland, Washington 99352

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Batavia Area Office ^P.O. Box 2000 Batavia, Illinois

U.S. Energy Research and Development, Health Physics and Safety Division

Brookhaven National Laboratory, Bldg. 535 20 N. Technology St.Upton, New York 11973



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Division of Naval Reactors 2521 Jefferson Davis Highway Arlington, Virginia 22202

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Naval Reactors Representative Office Bldg. 178, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Portsmouth, New Hampshire

U.S. Energy Research and. Development Administration Naval Reactors Representative Office Electric Boat Division Groton, Connecticut

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Naval Reactors Representative Office Pascagoula, Mississippi

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Naval Reactors Representative Office Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.Newport News, Virginia

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Naval Reactors Representative Office Charleston Naval Shipyard Building 195Charleston, South Carolina

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Naval Reactors Representative Office

. Norfolk Naval Shipyard Portsmouth, Virginia

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Energy Research Center Collins Ferry Road Morgantown, West Virginia 26505

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Laramie Energy Research Center P. O. Box 3395, University Station Laramie, Wyoming 82070

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Forks Energy Research Center Box 8213, University Station Grand Forks, North Dakota

• U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationBartlesville Energy Research Center P. O. Box 1398 Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74003


Categories of individuals covered by the system:ERDA personnel, contractor personnel, and any other persons

having access to certain ERDA facilities.Categories of records in the system:

ERDA and contractor personnel and other individuals’ radiation exposure records; and other records in connection with the transuranic registry.


(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq ), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) 83-703.


U.S. Navy to monitor radiation exposure of Naval and other personnel at Navy activities. NRC—To monitor radiation exposure or contractor personnel.

ERDA and contractors and consultants, other contractors, and organizations where radiation exposure exceed established levels, various States’ Departments and Labor Industries—to monitor radiation exposure of personnel. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Computer printouts, paper, index cards, magnetic tape, punched cards, microfilm

Retrievability: Name, alphabetical, numeric, alphanumeric code, chronological

Safeguards: Locked file cabinets, locked safes, guarded areas, secured buildings r ^


System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Operational Safety U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency

System Manager for this system. The Managers and _ Directors of the field locations listed under Notification below are designated the System Managers for their respective portions of this system.



U.S Energy Research and Development Administration (Headquarters)






U*S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationIdaho Operations Office550 2nd StreetIdaho Falls, Idaho 83401

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Laramie Energy Research,,Center P.O. Box 3395

• University Station Laramie, Wyoming 82070

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Morgantown Er . -gy Research Center Box 880Morgantown, West Virginia 26505




RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49921U S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pittsburgh Energy Research Center 4800 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway .JWells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616


b. Required Identifying Information: Geographic location of individual while employee of AEC/ERDA or name of field office/contractor, and time period.

Record access procedures:Refer to Notification Procedure. ~


Record source categories:Individual concerned, accident/incident investigation, Film

Badges, Dosimetry records, Previous Employee Records

System name:ERDA 31

Personnel Records of Former and Present Contractor Employees—ERDA ,



Categories of individuals covered by the system:Former and present contractor employees.

Categories of records in the system:Name, employment history, earnings, medical history, etc.


(42 U.S.C. 220.1), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


Fed. Agencies—Possible violations of labor statutes under their jurisdiction. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: PaperRetrievability: By contractor, by employees name and by subject

name.Safeguards: In locked or guarded building.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System managers) and address:The DirectorDivision of Labor RelationsU.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency



Privacy Act Administration Officer’s Mail Addresses:U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115










U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O: Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115










b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, location of employment, and period of employment.

Record Access procedures:Refer to Notification Procedure.


Record source categories:From contractors.

ERDA 32System name:

Personnel Security Clearance Files—ERDA System location:



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque < New Mexico 87115










Categories of individuals covered by the system:Employees and applicants for employment for ERDA and _

ERDA contractors; consultants; other individuals requiring access to classified information and facilities; access permittees who are authorized access in accordance with 10 CFR, part 95.

Categories of records in the system:Results of investigations concerning individuals processed for

access authorizations (clearances).Authority for maintenance of the system:

Public Law 93-438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C, 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)


Civil Service Commission,

Defense Investigative Service,

Department of Defense,

Department of State, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Central Intelligence Agency,

Federal Bureau of Investigation, and

U.S. Postal InspectorsTo refer, where there is an indication of a violation or potential

violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in nature, to the appropriate agency, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto.

Joint Committee on Atomic Energy—Employment purposes. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper file, manually retrieved; also, maintained at Albuquerque on computer printouts, magnetic tapes and punch cards.

Retrievability: Indexed by name and numerical file.Safeguards: Access limited to employees having need-to-know;

stored in repository under either guard or alarm protection.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Safeguards and Security U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency


Notification procedure:v a. U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration,






U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Idaho Operations Office 550 2nd Street .Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Nevada Operations Office P.O. Box 14100


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49923Las Vegas, Nevada 89114





b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, date of birth, social security number, clearance processing location, and time period.



Record source categories:Personnel Security Questionnaire and fingerprint card executed

by individual; background investigation reports by Federal Bureau of Investigation, Civil Service Commission and other Government Agencies conducting background investigations; summaries and transcripts of interviews with the individual; interrogatory letters to the individual; local police departments reports; and, security infraction reports received from the individual’s supervisor.


(c)(3),(d),(e)(1), (eX4XG),(H),(I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This exemption applies only to information in this system of records which is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k) (1), (2) and (5). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 1 11, Part 708, to be published in FEDERAL REGISTER.

ERDA 33System name:

Personnel Security Clearance Index—ERDASystem location:

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration (Headquarters) y






U.S. Energy Research and Nevada Operations Office


P.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114




Categories of individuals covered by the system:Energy Research and Development Administration employees

and Energy Research and Development Administration contractor employees and access permittees for whom access authorizations, clearances, have been initiated, granted and/or terminated.

Categories of records in the system:Records identifying history and status of processed access

authorizations (clearances).Authority for maintenance of the system:



ERDA Contractor employees—Security and Administration—Performance of regular duties;

Federal Law Enforcement, Intelligence and Investigative Agencies and other Federal agencies possessing classified information—To refer, where there is an indication of a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or regulatory in nature, to the appropriate agency, whether Federal, state, or local, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper file retrieved manually; also maintained on data cells, magnetic tape, punch cards and disc packs retrieved automatically.

Retrievability: Indexed by name, and access authorization (clearance) number.

Safeguards: Access limited to employees having need-to-know; stored in secured building subject to guard patrols and/or a la rm protection.









49924 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIONU.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115








U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Amarillo Area Office Pantex Plant Amarillo, Texas 79105

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Dayton Area Office Mound Laboratory Miamisburg, Ohio 45342

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Kansas City Area Office 2000 East Bannister Road Kansas City, Missouri 64141


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pinellas Area Office GE Pinellas Peninsula Rant St. Petersburg, Florida 33733


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Sandia Area Office, Technical Area I Kirtland Air Force Base-East Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115


b. Required Identifying Information: Indicate full name, date of birth, social security number and dates of employment.-



Record source categories:Personnel Security Questionnaire and fingerprint card executed

by individual and records of Energy Research and Development Administration Personnel Security Offices.


(c)(3),(d),(eXl), (e)(4)(G),(H),(I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This exemption applies only to information in this system of records which is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k) (1), (2) and (5). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 111, Part 708, to be published in FEDERAL REGISTER.

ERDA 35System name:

Security Education and/or Infraction Reports—ERDA System location:





Division of Safeguards and Security Washington, D.C. 20545



Categories of individuals covered by the system:Energy Research and Development Administration and Energy

Research and Development Administration contractor employees having access authorization (clearance) to classify information and/or materials.

Categories of records in the system:Records of security education lectures and investigative and

summary reports of security infraction incidents.Authority for maintenance of the system:

PUB. L. 93-438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), PUB. L. 83-703 as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUD. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.)

Routine uses of records maintained in the system, in c lu d in g categories of users and the purposes of such uses: No outside uses. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper file retrieved manually Retrievability: Chronologically and by name Safeguards: Access limited to employees with need-to-know;

stored in security areas


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49925Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities



System Manager for this system. The Managers and Directors of the field locations listed under Notification below are designated the System Managers for their respective portion of this system.



UJS. Energy Research and Development Administration (Headquarters)

Washington D.C. 20545







b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, date of birth, social security number, employment date and location.



Record source categories:Records from training officer; investigative reports from

Security personnel and employee supervisor; and Local, State and Federal authorities.

ERDA 36System name:

Special Access Authorization for Categories of Classified Information—ERDA

System location:U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Division of Safeguards and Security Washington, D.C. 20545

U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Nevada Operations Office P.O. Box 14100

Las Vegas, Nevada 89114



U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Dayton Area Office Mound LaboratoryMiamisburg, Ohio 45342 v

U.S. Eneigy Research and Development AdministrationKansas City Area Office2000 E. Bannister RoadKansas City, Missouri 64141 *


U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationOak Ridge Operations OfficeP.O. Box E, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration Pinellas Area Office GE Pinellas Peninsula St. Petersburg, Florida 33733


U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationLaramie Eneigy Research CenterP.O. Box 3395University StationLaramie, Wyoming 82070

U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration Sandia Area Office, Technical Area I Kirtland Air Force Base-East Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115



Categories of Individuals covered by the system:Individuals authorized access to special categories of'

information and comparmentalized Eneigy Research and Development Administration facilities and/or areas.

Categories of records in the system:Letters and memoranda of authorization to special categories

of classified information.Authority for maintenance of the system:


' Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purposes of such uses:

ERDA contractors—For purposes of performing contractual functions.


49926 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION“NATO, National Security Agency, and CIA—for determining

individuals who have access to classified information generated,by these agencies.” For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: paper file; also magnetic tape at Headquarters. Retrievability: indexed by name.Safeguards: access limited to employees with need-to-know;

stored in security areas under either guard or alarm protection.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System managerfs) and address:The Director, Division of Safeguards and Security U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency :

System Manager for this system. The Managers and directors of the field locations listed under Notification below are designated the System Managers for their respective portions of this system.


Privacy Act Administration Officer’s Mail'Addresses:










b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, date of birth, where employed, clearance processing location, and time period.


-Contesting record procedures:Refer to Headquarters.

Record source categories:Requests for access from sponsoring work unit initiated by

individual and supervisor.Systems exempted from certain provisions of the act:

The Administrator has exempted this system from subsections(c)(3),(d),(e)(1), (e)(4)(G),(H),(I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a under the Privacy Act of 1974. This exemption applies only to informatioii in this system of records which is exempt pursuant, to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k) (1), (2) and (5). See ERDA rules, 10 CFR Chapter 111, Part 708, to be published to FEDERAL REGISTER.

ERDA37System name:

Statistical Analysis Using Personnel Security Questionnaire (Mancuso Study)—ERDA

System location:U.S. Energy Research and Development AdministrationNevada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O. Box EOak Ridge, Tennessee, 37830


Categories of individuals covered by the system:Energy Research and Development Administration employees,

consultants and contractor employees and consultants who were granted Energy Research and Development Administration access authorizations (clearances); and employees of Manhattan Engineering District Project.

Categories of records in the system:Records of employees of the Manhattan Engineering District

Project; and, copies of Personnel Security Questionnaires after termination of employment.


(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et.seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577(42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).


Mancuso Study—Statistical Analyses using Personnel Security Questionnaires

Federal Law Enforcement and Investigative Agencies -To refer, where there is an indication of a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal or regulatory in nature, to the appropriate agency, whether Federal, state or local, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant thereto. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper file retrieved manually.Retrievability: Indexed by name.Safeguards: Maintained in guarded security areas in locked file

cabinets; access limited to individuals'having a need-to-know.Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System managerfs) and address:The Director, Division Safeguards and Security U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency

System Manager for this system. The Managers and Directors of the Held locations listed under Notification below are designated the System Managers for their respective portions of this system.

Notification procedure:


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49927a. U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration,








Record source categories:Clearance history of Manhattan Engineering District

employees, access permittees payments for security clearances; and, reports from investigative agencies.

ERDA 38System name:

Employee and Visitor Access Control Record—ERDA System location:





U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Dayton Area Office Mound Laboratory Miamisburg, Ohio 45342

'U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Kansas City Area Office 2000 E. Bannister Road Kansas City, Missouri 64141


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Pinellas Area Office GE Pinellas Peninsula St Petersburg, Florida 33733

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Rocky Flats Area Office P O. Box 928 Golden, Colorado 80401

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Sandia Area OfficeTechnical Area I, Rutland Air Forcé Base-East, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office,

P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Cliicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439





Categories of individuals covered by the system:Individuals visiting Energy Research and Development

Administration field offices, area offices and contractor facilities.ERDA employees seeking access to ERDA facilities and classified records.

Categories of records in the system:Record of individuals visiting Energy Research and

Development Administration and employee identification files maintained for access purposes.


(42 U..S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).


ERDA Contractors—Control access to classified information and areas

Department of Defense Contractors—Authorize access to classified information and areas. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper file, photo file, and microfiche retrieved manually. - Retrievability: Indexed chronologically and by name.

Safeguards: Access limited to employees with need-to-know; stored in guarded security areas.

Retention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “ Records Disposition.’’ Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate.

System managers) and address:The Direcor, Division of Safeguards and Security U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency






U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office



P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115







b. Required Identifying Information: Name, social security number, date of birth, clearance processing location, and time period.



Record source categories:Department of Defense, individual; Energy Research and

Development Agency Offices and Contractors; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; and other Government Agencies.

ERDA39System name:

Weapon Data and Weapons Program Facilities—Access to—ERDA






U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration San Francisco Operation Office 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building Oakland, California 94616


Categories of individuals covered by the system:Employees of ERDA, DOD, and other Government Agencies,

and their contractors and consultants requiring access to weapon data and/or ERDA nuclear weapons program facilities.

Categories of records in the system:Name, Rank, Social Security Number, Date of Birth,

citizenship, employer, type of clearance, number and date of clearance, categories of information requested and_ authorized, locations to be visited and dates of visit.


(42 U.S.C. 2201), PUB. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), PUB. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), PUB. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).


DOD and DOD contractors, C.I.A., N.S.C., O.M.B., Executive Office of the President, N.A.S.A., N.R.C., Congress, State Department—for ERDA to maintain list of personnel authorized by ERDA to have access to nuclear weapon data and weapons facilities, and to provide clearance information on ERDA and ERDA contractors to other agencies. Other agencies have access to this system to determine whether ERDA or ERDA contractor personnel have appropriate clearances for access to their facilities. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Microfiche and paper filesRetrievability: Alphabetic by name, purpose, and facility to be

visitedSafeguards: M ainta in ed in buddings with controlled accessRetention and disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities


System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Military Application U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration W ash in g to n , D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency










U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box A


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49929Aiken, South Carolina 29801




Record source categories:From individual, Government agencies, employers

ERDA40System name:

Nationwide Traineeship Reporting System—ERDASystem location:





Categories of individuals covered by the system:College graduate students participating in the ERDA sponsored

traineeship/laboratory graduate program.Categories of records in the system;.

Academic background, employment history, traineeship area of study, and mailing/permanent addresses.

Authority for maintenance of the system:Pub. L. 93-438 (42AJ.S.C. 5814), Pub. L. 83-703 as amended (42

U.S.C. 2201), Pub. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), Pub.L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), Pub. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Pub. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), Pub. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.);


University traineeship advisors—Compliance with contract terms covering traineeship administration functions; Contractor officials—For possible employment selection/notification. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.

Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, retaining, and disposing of records hi the system:

Storage: Paper, punched cards, and magnetic tape.Retrievability: Individual name, institution, Jaboratory, trainee-

ship program class, and traineeship identification number.Safeguards: Access to magnetic tapes is controlled through

established ERDA computer center procedures (personnel screening and physical security); access on need to know basis; and secure building


System manager(s) and address:The Director, Division of Biomedical and Environmental

Research, U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration (Headquarters), Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency System Manager for this system. “ The Managers and Directors of the field locations listed under Notification have been designated the System Managers for their respective portions of this system.”







b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, social security number, and time period.



Record source categories:University traineeship advisors.

ERD A 41System name:

Travel Files—ERDASystem location:


Office of the Controller Washington, D.C. 20545

U.S. Energy Reseaarch and Development Administration Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Aigonne, Illinois 60439

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Schenectady Naval Reactors Office Schenectady, New York 12301


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Richland Operations Office ■P.O. Box 550Richland, Washington 99352


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Grand Junction Office P.O. Box AGrand Junction, Colorado 81501


U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration. Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office P.O. Box 109West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration

FEDERAL REGISTER VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTORER 24, 1975


Neyada Operations OfficeP.O. Box 14100Las Vegas, Nevada 89114

Categories of individuals covered by the system:ERDA Personnel, Interviewers, Invitational Travelers (other

federal agencies and Congress).Categories of records in the system:

Travel vouchers, authorizations, advance payment records, , foreign travel requests and approvals, related correspondence, and real estate transaction documents.

Authority for maintenance of the system:Pub. L. 93-438 (42 U.S.C. 5814), Pub. L. 83-703 as amended (42

U.S.C. 2201), Pub. L. 93-409 (42 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), Pub.L. 93-473 (42 U.S.C. 5551 et seq.), Pub. L. 93-410 (30 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Pub. L. 93-577 (42 U.S.C. 5901 et seq.), Pub. L. 86-599 (30 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).


GAO Audit and Verification of accuracy and legality of disbursements. Treasury Department—Production of checks for trayel advances and payments. IRS—Taxable travel reimbursements. For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.


Storage: Paper, punched cards, magnetic tape and disk, and microfiche.

Retrievability: Individual Name (alphabetic) and chronologically.Safeguards: Access to magnetic tapes and disk files is controlled

through established ERDA computer center procedures (personnel screening and physical security); locked cabinets and desks; access on need to know basis; and secure building.

Retention add disposal: Records retention and disposal authorities are contained in ERDA, Manual Appendix 0230, “Records Disposition.” Records within the ERDA are destroyed by shredding, burning, or burial in a sanitary landfill, as appropriate.

System manager(s) and address:The Controller, Office of the Controller, U.S. Energy Research

and Development Administration (Headquarters), Washington, D.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency System Manager for this system. The Managers and Directors of the field locations listed under notification have been designated System Manager for their respective portions of this system.







U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration Idaho Operations Office 550 2nd Street

- Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401





U.S. Eneigy Research and Development Administration Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box AAiken, South Carolina 29801

b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, social security number, and location of employment, and time period.



Record source categories:Individual and ERDA approval officials.

APPENDIX AAAdditional Routine UsesThe following routine uses apply to and are incorporated by

reference into each system of records as stated therein:1. In the event that a record within this system of records main

tained by this agency indicates a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal or regulatory in nature, and whether arising by general statute or particular program pursuant thereto, the relevant records in the system of records may be referred as a routine use to the appropriate agency, whether Federal, State, local or foreign, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation or order issued pursuant thereto.

2. A record from this system of records may be disclosed as a routine use to a Federal, State, or local agency maintaining civil, criminal, or other relevant enforcement information or other pertinent information, if necessary to obtain information relevant to an Agency decision concerning the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of a security clearance, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit.

3. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Federal agency, in response to its request, in connection with the hiring or retention of ian employee, tire issuance of a security clearance, the reporting of an investigation of an employee, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit by the requesting agency, to the extent that the information is relevent and necessary to the requesting agency’s decision on the matter.

4. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in response to a court subpoena, to appropriate parties engaged in litigation or in preparation of possible litigation such as potential witnesses for the purpose of securing their testimony when necessary to courts, magistrates or administrative tribunals, to parties and their attorneys for the purpose of proceeding with litigation or settlement of disputes, to individuals seeking information by using established discovery procedures, whether in connection with civil, criminal, or regulatory proceedings.

5. A record maintained by this agency to carry out its functions which relates to civil and criminal proceedings may be disclosed to the news media in accordance with guidelines contained in Department of Justice regulations 28 C.F.R. 50.2.

6. A record maintained by this agency to carry out its functions may be disclosed to foreign governments in accordance with treaty obligations.

7. A record from this system of records may be disclosed to the Office of Management and Budget in connection with the review of private relief legislation as set forth in OMB Circular No. A019 at any stage of the legislative coordination and clearance process as set forth in that Circular.

8. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to ERDA contractors in performance of their contracts, and their officers and employees who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties subject to the same limitations applicable to ERDA officers and employees under the Privacy Act.


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 49931Accordingly, the proposed Notice of Systems of Records is

adopted with the foregoing changes, as well as corrections, and edi- _ tonal changes as set forth below.I Effective date: September 27,1975.

For the Administrator.

Robert F. Allnutt,D eputy Assistant Administrator fo r Administration.


49932 NOTICES

ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION

PRIVACY ACT IMPLEMENTATION Notice of Systems of Records

On August 26, 1975, ERDA published in the F ederal R egister at pages 38031- 38071 its N otice of System s of Records for im plem entation of the Privacy Act. Interested persons were invited to com m ent on or before Septem ber 25, 1975. As of 25 Septem ber 1975, no public com m ents have been received. ERDA now adopts the Notice of System s of Records as proposed subject to the following editorial changes and additions:

1. In ERDA System s Nos. 3, 9, 11, 12, 15, 21, 23, 26, and 30 under “System location :” and “N otification procedure:”, delete under a. the following:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, San Francisco Energy Research Center, 1429 Appraiser’s Building, 630 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California 94111.2. ERDA-1. Add under “System loca

tio n :” and “N otification procedure:”, under a. the following:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Chicago Operations Office, 9800 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439.3. ERDA-2. Under “Authority for

m aintenance of the system :”, line 1, betw een the words “Executive Order” and “PUB”, insert the number “11552,”. ?

Under “Notification procedure:”, change paragraph b. to read as follows:

b. Required Identifying Inform ation: Full name, field of specialization, and tim e period.

4. ERDA-2. Under “Notification procedure:”, change paragraph b. to read as follows:

b. Required Identifying Inform ation: L ocation (s), full name, social security number, date of birth, and tim e period.

5. ERDA-5. Under “N otification procedure:”, change paragraph b. to read as follows:

b. Required Identifying Inform ation: Full nam e, date of birth, social security number, clearance processing location, and tim e period.

6. ERDA-6. Under “Notification procedure:”, subparagraph a., insert the fo llowing:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Chicago Operations Office, 9800 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439.

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Nevada Operations Office, P.O. Box 14100, Las Vegas, Nevada 89114.Under “Notification procedure:”,

change paragraph b. to read as follows: b. Required Identifying Information:

Full name, location of last employment, and tim e period.

7. 'ERDA-7. Under “Notification procedure:”, change paragraph b. to read as follows:

b. Required Identifying Information: Full nam e of consultant, nam e of contractor, area of contract work performed, and tim e period.

8. ERDA-8. Under “Notification procedure:”, change paragraph b. to read as follow s:

b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, date of birth, social security number, and tim e period.

9. ERDA-9. Under, “Notification procedure.”, change paragraph b. to read as follow s:

b. Required Identifying Information: Full nam e and tim e period.

10. ERDA-10. Under “Notification procedure:”, change paragraph b. to read as fo llow s:

b. Required Identifying Information: Individuals’ name, ERDA location of last employment or cognizant office, and time period.

11. ERDA-11. Under “System M anager^ ) and address:”, change to read as follow s:

“The Director of Personnel, U.S. Energy Research and Development Adm inistration, W ashington, p.C. 20545, has been designated the Agency System Manager for this system. The cognizant supervisor personnel in the appropriate office and location listed under Notification if said personnel retain such records, are designated System Managers for their respective portions of this system .”


b. Required Identifying Information: Complete name, and, if appropriate, the geographic location (s), organization(s), the nam e of the supervisor where requester believes such records may be lo cated, and the tim e period.

12. ERDA-12. Under “Notification procedure : ”, change paragraph b. to read as fo llow s:

b. Required Identifying Inform ation: Full name, social security number, date of birth, occupational category and location at which application or other m aterial was subm itted: in case of college recruitm ent material, applicable college or university n am e; and tim e period.

13. ERDA-13. Under “Notification procedure:”, change paragraph b. to read as fo llow s:

b. Required Identifying Inform ation: Full nam e and tim e period.

14. ERDA-14. Under “System location :”, add the following:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Richland Operations Office, P.O. Box 550, Richland, Washington 99352.Under “Notification procedure:”,


Full name, training program, and time period.

Under “Records source categories:”, change to read, “From individuals and contractors by whom the individual is employed.”

15i ERDA-15. Under “Notification procedure:”, change paragraph b. to read as follows:

b. Required Identifying Inform ation: Complete name, and, if appropriate, the geographic location(s) and organizatio n ^ ) where requester believes such record may be located, social security number, date of birth, and tim e period.

16. ERDA-16. U nder “Notification p ro ced u re :” , change p a ra g ra p h s , to read as follows:

b. R equired Iden tify ing Inform ation: F u ll nam e of ind iv idual an d tim e period.

17. ERDA-17. U nder “System locat io n :” an d “N otification p rocedu re :”, add th e fo llow ing:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Chicago Operations Office, 9800 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439.U nder “System lo c a tio n : ”, ad d th e fol

lowing :U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad- ' ministration, Savannah River Operations

Office, P.O. Box A, Aiken, South Carolina 29801.U nder “N otification p ro ced u re :”, de

le te from su b p arag rap h a. th e following:U .S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office, P.O. Box 109, West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122.U nder “N otification procedure:”,

change su b p arag rap h b. to read as follows:

b. R equired Iden tify ing Inform ation: F u ll nam e, d a te of b ir th , social security num ber, an d tim e period.

18. ERDA-18. U nder “System locat io n :” an d “N otification p rocedu re :”, add u n d er a! th e follow ing:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration (Headquarters), Washington D.C. 20545.19. ERDA-20. U nder “System loca

t io n :” an d “N otification p ro ced u re :”, add u n d er a. th e follow ing:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Richland Operations Office, P.O. Box 550, Richland, Washington 99352.U nder “N otification p ro ced u re :” , add

u n d e r a. th e fo llow ing:■U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Laramie Energy Research Center, P.O. Box 3395, University Station, Laramie, Wyoming 82070.U nder “N otification procedure:”,

change p a ra g ra p h b. to read as follows: b. R equired Iden tify ing Inform ation:

F u ll name, location (s) of ERDA installation, w here G overnm en t d riv e r’s license was issued, an d tim e period.20. ERDA-21. U nder “N otification proc ed u re :”, change p a ra g ra p h b. to read as fo llow s:

b. R equired Id en tify ing Inform ation: F u ll nam e, id en tity a n d address of employer, an d da tes of em ploym ent.

21. ERDA-22. U nder “N otification proc ed u re :”, change p a ra g ra p h b. to read as follows:

b. R equired Iden tify ing Inform ation: C on trac to r, union, ind iv idual nam e, and tim e period.22. ERDA-24. U nder “System location: ”, delete th e follow ing:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Mound Laboratory—Medical, P.O. Box 32, Miamisburg, Ohio 35342.

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Chicago Operations Office- Safety Division, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 40 , NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

NOTICES 49933

Under “System location:” and “Notification procedure:”, add under a. the following:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, San Francisco Operations Office, 1333 Broadway, Wells Fargo Building, O akland, California 94616.

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Morgantown Energy Research Center, P.O. Box 880, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505.Under “Categories of records in the

system:”, change to read as follows: “Medical history on employees result

ing from medical examinations and radiation exposure. In case of injury, de- I scription of injury occurrence and treatment. In addition, medical records of periodic physical examinations; andpsy-

! chological testing, routine first aid, and other visits.”

Under “Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purpose of such uses:”, change to read as follows:

“Physicians, U.S. Department of Labor, various States’ Departments of Labor and Industries, and Contractors—to describe and record information as a result of periodic and physical examinations to ascertain suitability of employee to a better job assignment with regard to health, and to maintain a record of occupational injuries or illnesses.”

Under “Notification procedure:”, change paragraph b. to read as follows :

b. Required Identifying Information: Applicable location or locations where individual is or was employed, full name of requester, social security number, employees) , and time period.

23. ERDA-26. Under “Categories of individuals covered by the system:”, change to read as follows:* “ERDA employees, contractor employ

ees, and any other persons having access to ERDA facilities.”

Under “Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purpose of such uses:”, add the following:

“ERDA contractors and consultants, States’ Departments of Labor and Industries and other State Agencies, U.S. Department of Labor, National Drivers’ Registry, and Department of Transportation—for purposes of processing insurance claims and accident reporting.”


b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, social security number and/ or birth date, geographic location of the accident and time period.

24. ERDA-27. Under “Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purpose of such uses:”, add the following:

Veteran’s Administration—for evalu- , ~®n, °f Veteran’s benefits to which the individual may be entitled.

States’ Departments o f. Employment security-—for determining entitlement to unemployment compensation or other state benefits.”

Under “Notification procedure:”, k If pa.raSraPh b. to read as follows:• Required Identifying Information:

Full name, social security number, location (s) of employment, and time period.

25. ERDA-28. Under “Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purpose of such use§:”, change to read as follows:

“U.S. Department of Labor—to determine compliance with Federal labor laws.”


b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, location(s) of employment, and time period.



27. ERDA-30. Under “Categories of individuals covered by the system:”, change to read as follows:

"ERDA personnel, contractor personnel, and any other persons having access to certain ERDA facilities.”

Under “Categories of records in the system:”, change to read as follows:

“ERDA and contractor personnel and other individuals’ radiation exposure records; and other records in connection with the transuranic registry.”

Under “Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purpose of such uses:”, add the following:

“ERDA contractors and consultants, other contractors, and organizations where radiation exposure exceed established levels, various States’ Departments and Labor Industries—to monitor radiation exposure of personnel.”


b. Required Identifying Information: Geographic location of individual while employee of AEC/ERDA or name of field office/contractor, and time period.

28. ERDA-31. Under “System location:” and “Notification procedure:”, add under a. the following:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Nevada Operations Office, P.O. Box 14100, Las Vegas, Nevada 89114.

- Under “Notification procedure:”, add under a. the following:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Richland Operations Office, P.O. Box 550, Richland, Washington 99352Under “Notification procedure:”,

change paragraph b. to read as follows:" b. Required Identifying Information:

Full name, location of employment, and period of employment.

29. ERDA-32. Under “System location:” and “Notification procedure:”, under a. the following:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box E, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830.Under “Notification procedure:”,


Full name, date of birth, social security

number, clearance processing location, and time period.


ministration, Savannah River Operations Office, P.O. Box A, Aiken, South Carolina 29801.31. ERDA-35. Under “System loca

tion:” and “Notification procedure:”, add under a. the following:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Savannah River Operations Office, P.O. Box A, Aiken, South Carolina 29801.32. ERDA-36. Under “System loca

tion:” and “Notification procedure:”, add under a. the following:U.S. Energy Research and Development Ad

ministration, Chicago Operations Office, 9800 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439.

U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Savannah River Operations Office, P.O. Box A, Aiken, South Carolina 29801.Under “Routine uses of records main

tained in the system, including categories of users and the purpose of such uses:”, add the following:

“NATO, National Security Agency, and CIA—for determining individuals who have access to classified information generated by these agencies.”


b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, date of birth, where employed, clearance processing location, and time period.

33. ERDA-37. Under “Notification procedure:”, paragraph a., delete lines 3 through 10, and change paragraph b. to read as follows:

b. Required Identifying Infromation: Full name and time period. .


ministration, Richland Operations Office, P.O. Box 550, Richland, Washington 99352.Under “Notification procedure:”,


Name, social security number, date of birth, clearance processing location, and time period.



36. ERDA-40. Under “System Manager (s) and address:”, add the following:

“The Managers and Directors of the field locations listed under Notification have been designated the System Managers for their respective portions of this system.”


b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, social security number, and time period.


49934 NOTICES

37. ERDA-41. Under “Notification procedure:”, change paragraph b. to read as follows’:

b. Required Identifying Information: Full name, social security number, location of employment, and time period.

38. Insert at the beginning of ERDA’s System Notices the following table of contents:

T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s

ERDA 1.

ERDA 2.

ERDA 3

ERDA 4.

ERDA 5.

ERDA 6.

ERDA 7.

ERDA 8.

ERDA 9.

ERDA 10.

ERDA 11

ERDA 12.

ERDA 13.

ERDA 14.

ERDA 15.

ERDA 16.

ERDA 17.

ERDA 18.

ERDA 19. ERDA 20.

ERDA 21. ERDA 22.

ERDA 23.

Alien visits and participation— ERDA.

Applications and reference checks for overseas employment with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)-— ERDA.

ERDA Personnel—Appraisal and Development Records—ERDA.

Census of High Energy Physicists—ERDA.

Clearance Board Cases Administrative Review and Personnel— ERDA.

Compensation for Contractor Employees ($25,000 or more) — ERDA.

Consultants to ERDA Contractors—( Directory of ) —ERDA.

Security Correspondence File— ERDA.

Discrimination Complaint File— ERDA.

Employment and Financial Interests—ERDA.

ERDA Personnel—Supervisor Records—ERDA.

ERDA Personnel Applicant Records—ERDA.

ERDA Contractor Employee Insurance Claims—ERDA.

ERDA Technology Training Program—Skill Training at Technician Level—ERDA.

ERDA Personnel/General Employment Records—(Addendum to the U.S. Civil Service Commission Federal Register Notice of Records reporting CSC-General Personnel Folder and Related Records)—ERDA.

FHA Insured Loans (Certificates of Eligibility)—ERDA.

Firearms Qualifications Record— ERDA.

Investigations Pertaining to Violations of Law and Losses of Security Interest—ERDA.

Foreign Travel—ERDA.Government Driver’s License

File—ERDA.Investigative Files—ERDA.Labor Standards Complaints and

Grievance Files—ERDA.Legal Office—Claims, Litigations,

Criminal Violations, Patents, and other Legal Files—ERDA.

ERDA 24. Medical History System—ERDA and Contractor Employees— ERDA.

ERDA 25.

ERDA 26.

ERDA 27. ERDA 28.

ERDA 29

ERDA 30

ERDA 31

ERDA 32

ERDA 33

ERDA 35

ERDA 36

ERDA 37

ERDA 38

ERDA 39

ERDA 40

ERDA 41

Nuclear Qualification Examination Records (for personnel to be assigned to ships, shipyards and prototypes)—ERDA.

Occupational and Industrial Health and Safety Records— ERDA.

Payroll and Leave—ERDA.Payroll and pay related data for

employees of terminated contractors—ERDA.

Personnel Assurance Records— ERDA.

Personnel radiation exposure information—ERDA.

Personnel Records of Former and Present Contractor Employees—ERDA.

Personnel Security Clearance Files—ERDA.

Personnel Security Clearance Index—ERDA.

Security Education and/or Infraction Reports—ERDA.

Special Access Authorization for Categories of Classified Information—ERDA.

Statistical Analysis Using Personnel Security Questionnaire (Mancuso Study)—ERDA.

Employee and Visitor Access Control Record—ERDA.

Weapon Data and Weapons Program Facilities—Access to— ERDA.

Nationwide Traineeship Reporting System—ERDA.

Travel Files—ERDA.39. In each system notice, the paragraph

entitled “Routine uses of records maintained in the system including categories of users and the purposes of such uses:” is hereby amended by the addition at the end of the paragraph of the following words:

“For additional routine uses see Appendix AA.”

40. Appendix AA is added as follows:A p p e n d ix AA

ADDITIONAL ROUTINE USES

The following routine uses apply to and are incorporated by reference into each system of records as stated therein :

1. In the event that a record within this system of records maintained by this agency indicates a violation or potential violation of law, whether civil, criminal or regulatory in nature, and whether arising by general statute or particular program pursuant thereto, the relevant records in the system of records, may be referred as a routine use to the appropriate agency, whether Federal, State, local or foreign, charged with the responsibility of investigating of prosecuting such violation or charged with enforcing or implementing the statute, or rule, regulation or order issued pursuant thereto.

2. A record from this system of records may be disclosed as a routine use to a Federal, State, or local agency maintaining civil,

criminal, or other relevant enforcement information or other pertinent information, if necessary to obtain information relevant to an Agency decision concerning the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of a security clearance, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit.

3. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Federal agency, in response to its request, in connection with the hiring or retention of an employee, the issuance of a security clearance, the reporting of an investigation of an employee, the letting of a contract, or the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit by the requesting agency, to the extent that the information is relevant and necessary to the requesting agency’s decision on the matter.

4. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in response to a court subpoena, to appropriate parties engaged in litigation or in preparation of possible litigation such as potential witnesses for the purpose of securing their testimony when necessary to courts, magistrates or administrative tribunals, to parties and their attorneys for the purpose of proceeding with litigation or settlement of disputes, to individuals seeking information by using established discovery procedures, whether in connection with civil, criminal, or regulatory proceedings.

5. A record maintained by this agency to carry put its functions which relates to civil and criminal proceedings may be disclosed to the news media in accordance with guidelines contained in Department of Justice regulations 28 C.F.R. 50.2.

6. A record maintained by this agency to carry out its functions may be disclosed to foreign governments in accordance with treaty obligations.

7. A record from this system of records may be disclosed to the Office of Management and Budget in connection with the review of private relief legislation as set forth in OMB Circular No. A-19 at any stage of the legislative coordination and clearance process as set forth in that Circular.

8. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to ERDA contractors in performance of their contracts, and their officers and employees who have a heed for the record in the performance of their duties subject to the same limitations applicable to ERDA officers and employees under the Privacy Act.

Accordingly, the proposed Notice of Systems of Records is adopted with the foregoing changes, as well as corrections, and editorial changes as set forth below.

Effective date: September 27,1975.For the Administrator

Robert F. Allnutt, Deputy, Assistant Administrator

for Administration.(FR Doc.75-26241 Filed 9-26-75:4:01 pm]

FÉDÉRAL REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 207— FRIDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1975

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION 49935

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

PR IV A C Y ACT O F 1974 N otice of A dditional System o f R ecords

Notice is hereby given that the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), pursuant to the requirements of section 3(e) of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a(e), 88 Stat. 18%, 1899-1900, proposes to adopt and “Unofficial Personnel System” as an additional system of records. Such system is to supplement the FDIC’s previously adopted systems, as published on October.6, 1975, on page 46288 of the Federal Register.

The FDIC originally considered the category of information contained in this system to be within the Civil Service Commission’s proposed notice for personnel records. However, after review of the Civil Service Commission’s regulations, as finally adopted on September 30, 1975 (40 FR 45094), and published notice, the Board of Directors of the FDIC has determined that certain information maintained on FDIC employees is not covered by the Civil Service Commission publications. Accordingly, the Board of Directors of the FDIC has determined that it is necessary for the FDIC to establish a separate system of records as delineated in the following proposed notice.

Because of the need for the existence of the following system of records for daily internal personnel functions, the Board of Directors of the FDIC has determined, pursuant to section 302.6 of the rules and regulations of the FDIC, that good cause exists for the waiver of the thirty day period for effectiveness of the following notice and, accordingly, the notice will be effective, except for the “ Routine Uses” section, on October 24, 1975. The FDIC will, however, accept and consider any comments on the notice. The Privacy Act does require advance publication of the “Routine Uses” section of system notices. The “Routine Uses” section of the notice set out below is therefore proposed for adoption and written public comments.

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views or arguments regarding the proposed notice and its routine uses to the Office of the Executive Secretary, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington, D.C. 20409, no later than November 22,1975. “ fg

By order of the Board of Directors, October 17, 1975.FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Alan R. Miller, Executive Secretary.

FDIC—15System name: Unofficial Personnel System—FDIC.

System location: Personnel Branch, FDIC, 1709 New York Ave., NW., Washington, D.C. 20409. In addition records are maintained at the Division of Office levels in the FDIC Washington office and at the FDIC Regional Offices. (See Appendix A for the location of FDIC Regional Offices.)

Categories of individuals covered by the system: All current and former FDIC employees.

Categories of records in the system: This system consists of general personnel-related records that are maintained in addition to the Civil Service Commission’s published “General Personnel Records,” CSC/GOVT-3, notice. These records may contain information on individuals relating to: birthdate; Social Security Number; past and present salaries, grades, and position titles; home address and telephone number; emergency contacts, addresses and telephone numbers; employment history; original application and resume; statement of bank loans and stock ownership; record of equipment and material issued to the individual; record of leave and time-and-attendance; written notes or memoranda on employee performance; counseling; and, data documenting reasons for personnel actions, decisions, or recommendations made about an employee.

Authority for maintenance of the system: Sec. 9 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1819); Sec. 506 of the Federal Records Act of 1950 (44 U S.C. 3101).

Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories of users and the purposes of such uses: Primarily maintained to be used by employee’s supervisor for preparation of general personnel actions; however, disclosure may be made to financial and credit institutions for loan and credit purposes (solely to verify the employee’s employment with the FDIC, date of employment and pay grade), to the Civil Service Commission in the event of any grievance procedures, or, in the event of any litigation, to the appropriate court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal as evidence, or to counsel for the presentation of evidence and/or in the course of discovery.


Storage: Maintained on file cards and in file folders.Retrievability: Indexed by name.Safeguards: Maintained in lockable metal cabinets.Retention and disposal: Records are destroyed when no longer

relevant to the purpose for which they were compiled and maintained. Generally, records are destroyed when the employee no longer workds in the Division or Office which compiled and maintained the information.

System manager(s) and address: Controller, Office of the Controller, FDIC, 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20409, for Corporation level records. For FDIC Division or Office levels, the Head of the appropriate Division or Office; for FDIC Regional Offices, the Regional Director. (See Appendix A for the location of FDIC Regional Offices.)

Notification procedure: Executive Secretary, Records Unit, FDIC, 550 17th St., NW., Washington, D.C. 20429.

Record access procedures: Same as “Notification” above.Contesting record procedures: Same as “Notification” above.Record source categories: Individuals to whom the records per

tain, and their immediate supervisors or persons at other supervisory levels.

Systems exempted from certain provisions of the act: None.

[FR Doc.75-28498 Filed 10-23-75;8:45 am]


49936 NOTICES

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[FPMR Temp. Reg. E—43]PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND DATA

SECURITYRules and Procedures

1. Purpose. This temporary regulation sets forth rules and procedures relevant to protection of privacy and data security in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974.

2. Effective date. This regulation is effective September 27, 1975.

3. Expiration date. This regulation expires March 31,1976.

4. Background. The Privacy Act of 1974 sets forth certain safeguards for an individual against an invasion of personal privacy by requiring Federal agencies to abide by the provisions of the act. This regulation informs the agencies of GSA’s privacy safeguards concerning ADP and telecommunications.

5. General. This regulation sets forth rules and procedures to be followed by agencies in making use of, or providing, interagency ADP services. This regulation applies to interagency, intraagency, and commercial ADP service arrangements. This regulation also sets forth the procedures to be followed by agencies in preparing'solicitation documents for procuring ADP equipment, software, and services and telecommunications facilities and services.

6. Applicability. The provisions of this regulation apply to all Federal agencies.

7. Definitions. For the purpose of this temporary regulation the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below:

a. The term “agency” means agency as defined in the Privacy Act of 1974.

b. The term “individual” means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.

c. The term “maintain” includes'maintain, collect, use, or disseminate.

d. The term “record” means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an agency, including, but not limited to, his education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history and that contains his name or the idehtifyinig number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or a photograph.

e. The term “system of records” means a group of any records under the control of any agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual.

f. The term “threats and hazards” means man-made or natural events, the occurrence of which may result in the loss, alteration, or unauthorized access to data.

g. The term “safeguards” means those procedures, methods, and devices which have as their specific function the prevention or mitigation of the effects of threats and hazards.

h. The term “rules of conduct” means those administrative procedures, meth-

ods of work, and standards of conduct which together define the manner in which persons involved in the design, development, operation, or maintenance of systems of records will maintain, collect, use, or disseminate such records.

i. T he te rm “G overnm ent c o n trac to r” m eans an y ind iv idual or o th e r en tity who co n trac ts to o pera te by o r on behalf of a n agency a system of records to accom plish a n agency function .

8. Security and privacy requirements.a. The Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C.

552a, requires that each agency that maintains a system of records shall:

(1) Maintain in its records only such information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the agency required to be accomplished by statute or by Executive order of the President (5 U.S.C. 552a(e) (10)). Thus, protection of privacy is promoted by limiting the amount of information maintained.

(2) Establish rules of conduct for persons involved in the design, development, operation, or maintenance of any system of records or in maintaining any record, and instruct each such person with respect to such rules and the requirements of this action, including rules and procedures adopted pursuant to this section and the penalties for noncompliance (5 U.S.C. 552a(e) (9)).

(3) Establish appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of records and to protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to their security or integrity which could result in substantial harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness to any individual on whom information is maintained (5 U.S.C. 552a(e) (10)). It should be noted that the development of appropriate safeguards will necessarily be tailored to the requirements of the system of records being maintained. In addition, the need to provide safeguards may be influenced Jay other considerations such as ensuring continuity of agency operations, protecting proprietary data, protecting national security information, and ensuring accuracy and reliability of information.

bt Agencies contemplating acquisition of ADP or telecommunications equipment or services must determine whether such acquisitions will involve maintaining a system of records defined by the act. If so, the requirements cited in paragraph 8a, above, must be met, and the rules and procedures set forth in this temporary regulation must be adhered to.

c. Definition of responsibilities for implementing the act are contained in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-108, dated July 1, 1975. Guidelines for implementing Section 3 of the act are contained in OMB’s Privacy Act Guidelines dated July 1, 1975. The OMB guidelines are found in 40 FR 28948.

9. Interagency ADP services. Special considerations and responsibilities apply in those instances in which one agency (the user agency) obtains ADP services from another (the provider

agency) in the course of maintaining or operating systems of records. Specifically, these instances include the ADP Sharing Program (41 CFR 101-32.203) and the Federal Data Processing Centers (FDFC) (41 CFR 101-32.8).

10. User agency responsibilities. A user agency shall:

a. Determine its data confidentiality and security requirements before storing or processing systems of records at a provider agency’s facility;

b. Include in its screening of ADP resources an examination of the ability of each resource to meet its data confidentiality and security requirements (Specifically, the adequacy of available technical, administrative, and physical safeguards to counter anticipated threats and hazards must be evaluated.);

c. Satisfy itself that the rules of conduct governing the activities of personnel of the provider agency are commensurate with its data confidentiality and security requirements;

d. Obtain services from only those provider agencies that fully meet the user agency’s data confidentiality and security requirements;

e. Recognize that the records it stores or processes at the facility of a provider agency will be considered to be maintained by the user agency; and

f. Establish written rules governing the disclosure by a provider agency of records considered to be maintained by the user agency.

11. Provider agency responsibilities. A provider agency shall:

a. As specified in 8a,' above, develop rules of conduct for personnel involved in design, development, operation, or maintenance of equipment, systems, or services used to store or process systems of records;

b. In accordance with 8a, above, undertake a continuing program of review of its operations to ensure that threats and hazards to data confidentiality and security are properly identified and that appropriate safeguards are implemented;

c. Make available rules of conduct and information on safeguards to user agencies;

d. Refrain from disclosing any records stored or processed for a user agency except to that agency or under written rules established and provided by that user agency; and

e. Make known to user agencies changes in its perception of threats and hazards to data confidentiality and security or any changes in the safeguards implemented to protect against those threats and hazards. User agencies may use information on such changes to reevaluate its usage of the provided agency’s services.

12. Contractors’ responsibilities. Subsequent to the effective date of the act, all persons, including contractors, who are involved in the design, development, operation, or maintenance of any system of records, or the maintenance of any record, are subject to the applicable provisions of the act, including the agency rules of conduct. In addition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(m), Government con-


NOTICES 49937tractors, as defined in Section 7(i), above, and their employees are also subject to the criminal sanctions of 5 U.S.C. 552a (i).

13. Solicitation documents.a. Agencies authorized to procure ADP

equipment, software, or services in accordance with 41 CFR 101-32 or to procure telecommunications equipment or services in accordance with 41 CFR 101- 35 shall include in their solicitation documents:

(1) Agency rules of conduct which a contractor and his employees shall be required to adhere to;

(2) A list of the anticipated threats and hazards which are pertinent to the contemplated procurement and which the contractor must safeguard against;

(3) A description of the safeguards which the agency specifically requires the contractor to provide; and

(4) A notice that under 5 U.S.C. 552a (m) of the act Government contractors and any employees of such contractors are subject to the criminal penalties of 5 U.S.C. 552a (i).

b. Agencies shall also:(1) Evaluate vendor proposals to de

termine the adequacy of the safeguards proposed in meeting the anticipated threats or hazards to the security and integrity of records;

(2) Verify that any safeguards proposed by an offeror before award of a contract are in use and effective before commencing work under the contract;

(3) Identify in the specification and 'contract the test methods, procedures, and criteria to be used to verify that all safeguards have in fact been provided;

(4) Verify that any safeguards provided as a result of work done under the contract are effective; and

(5) Include in the system specifications and contract the requirements of the Government for a program of subsequent inspection that will be followed to ensure the continued efficacy and efficiency of safeguards and the discovery and countering of new threats and hazards.

14. Agency comments. Comments concerning the effect or impact of this regulation on agency operations or programs should be submitted to the General Services Administration (CP), Washington, DC 20405, no later than October 31,1975.

Arthur F. S ampson, Administrator of General Services.

October 9,1975.[PR Doc.75-28628 Piled 10-23-75:8:45 am]



DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment Standards Administration

MINIMUM W AGES FOR FEDERALAND

FEDERALLY ASSISTED CONSTRUCTION

General W age Determination Decisions

49940 NOTICES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOREmployment Standards

AdministrationMINIMUM WAGES FOR FEDERAL AND FEDERALLY ASSISTED CONSTRUCTION

General Wage Determination DecisionsGeneral Wage Determination Deci

sions of the Secretary of Labor specify, in accordance with applicable law and on the basis of information available to the Department of Labor from its study of local wage conditions and from other sources, the basic hourly wage rates and fringe benefit payments which are determined to be prevailing for the described classes of laborers and mechanics employed in construction activity of the character and in the localities specified therein.

The determinations in these decisions of such prevailing rates and fringe benefits have been made by authority of the Secretary of Labor pursuant to the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act of March 3, 1931, as amended (46 Stat. 1494, as amended, 40 U.S.C. 276a) and of other Federal statutes referred to in 29 CFR 1.1 (including the statutes listed a t 36 FR 306 following Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 24-70) containing provisions for the payment of wages which are dependent upon determinations by the Secretary of Labor under the Davis-Bacon Act; and pursuant to the provisions of Part 1 of Subtitle A of Title 29 of Code of Federal Regulations, Procedure for Pre-determination of Wage Rates, (37 FR 21138) and of Secretary of Labor’s Orders12-71 and 15-71 (36 FR 8755, 8756). The prevailing rates and fringe benefits determined in these decisions shall, in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing statutes, constitute the minimum wages payable on Federal and federally assisted construction projects to laborers and mechanics of the specified classes engaged on contract work of the character and in the localities described therein.

Good cause is hereby found for not utilizing notice and public procedure thereon prior to the issuance of these determinations as prescribed in 5 U.S.C. 553 and not providing for delay in effective date as prescribed in that section, because the necessity to issue construction industry wage determination frequently and in large volume causes procedures to be impractical and contrary to the public interest.

General Wage Determination Decisions are effective from their date of publication in the Federal R egister without limitation as to time and are to be used in accordance with the provisions of 29 CFR, Parts 1 and 5. Accordingly, the applicable decision together with any modifications issued subsequent to its publication date shall be made a part of every contract for performance of the described work within the geographic area indicated as required by an applicable Federal prevailing wage law and 29 CFR,

Part 5. The wage rates contained therein shall be the minimum paid under such contract by contractors and subcontractors on the work.Modifications and Supersedeas Deci

sions to General Wage DeterminationD ecisions

Modifications and Supersedeas Decisions to General Wage Determination Decisions are based upon information obtained concerning changes in prevailing hourly wage rates and fringe benefit payments since the decisions were issued.

The determinations of prevailing rates and fringe benefits made in the Modifications and Supersedeas Decisions have been made by authority of the Secretary of Labor pursuant to the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act of March 3, 1931, as amended (46 Stat. 1494, as amended, 40 U.S.C. 276a) and of other Federal statutes referred to in 29 CFR 1.1 (including the statutes listed at 36 FR 306 following Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 24- 70) containing provisions for the payment of wages which are'dependent upon determination by the Secretary of Labor under the Davis-Bacon Act; and pursuant to the provisions of Part 1 of Subtitle A of Title 29 of Code of Federal Regulations, Procedure for Predetermination of Wage Rates, (37 FR 21138) and of Secretary of Labor’s Orders 13-71 and 15-71 (36 FR 8755, 8756). The prevailing rates and fringe benefits determined in foregoing. General Wage Determination Decisions, as hereby modified, and/or superseded shall, in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing statutes, constitute the minimum wages oavable on Federal and federally assisted construction projects to laborers and mechanics of the specified classes engaged in contract work of the character and in the localities described therein.

Modifications and Suoersedeas Deci- tions are effective from their date of Dub- lication in the Federal Register without limitation as to time and are to be used in accordance with the provisions of 29 CFR, Parts 1 and 5.

Any person, organization, or governmental agency having an interest in the wages determined as prevailing is encouraged to submit wage rate information for consideration by the Deoar iment. Further information and self-explanatory forms for the purpose of submitting this data may be obtained by writing to the U S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Special Wage Standards, Division of Wage Determinations, Washington, D.C. 20210. The cause for not utilizing the rule-making procedures prescribed in 5 U.S.C. 553 has been set forth in the original General Wage Determination Decision. *

Modifications to general wage determination decisions. The numbers of the decisions being modified and their dates of publication in the Federal Register are listed with each State.

Alabama:AL75-1069 -----------------July 18, 1975.

Arkansas:AR75—4073 ------ ------------- Apr. 4, 1975.AR75-4083 ------------ -- ---Apr. 18, 1975.

Georgia:GA75—1025 ------------------- Feb. 28,1975.GA75-1039 ---------------- ---Apr. 11, 1975.

Idaho:ID75-5120 --------------- Oct. 3, 1975.

Kentucky:KY75-1096 ------------------- Sept. 26,1975.

Pennsylvania:PA75—3027 ------------------- Mar. 28,1975PA75-3017; PA75-3101; PA

75-3102; PA75-3104_____ Oct. 3, 1975. Ohio:

OH75-2056 ____ ________ Apr. 4,1975.Supersedeas decisions to general wage

determination decisions. The numbers of the decisions/ being superseded and their dates of publication in the Federal Register are listed with each State.

Supersedeas Decision numbers are in parentheses following the numbers of the decisions being superseded.Alabama:

AR-4013 (AL75—5131)___ _ July 26, 1974.Arkansas:

AR-4013 (AL75-5131) —I . . Do.Connecticut:

CT75—5045(NY75-3108) __ Apr. 4, 1975. Delaware:

CT75-5045 (NY75-3108) Do.Florida:

AR-4000(FL75—1104) _____ July 5, 1974.AR-4013 (AL75-5131) July 26, 1974.

Kentucky:AQ-4066 (KY75—1105) — _ Feb. 1,1974.AR-4013 (AL75-5131) July 26,1974.

Louisiana:AR-4013 (AL75-5131) ___ Do.

Maine:CT75-5045(NY75—3108) __ Apr. 4, 1975.

Maryland:CT75—5045 (NY75-3108) __ Do.

Massachusetts:CT75—5045 (NY75—3108) — Do.MA75—2070(MA75—2118) -- May 9,1975.

Michigan:AM-403 (MI75-2120) ......... Aug. 18,1971.

Mississippi:AR-4013 (AL75—5131)......... July 26, 1974.

Missouri:AR-4013 (AL75—5131)_____ - Do.

New Hampshire:CT75—5045(NY75-3108) __ Apr. 4, 1975.

New Jersey:CT75—5045 (NY75-3108) __ Do.

New York:CT75-5045 (NY75-3108) __ Do.

Pennsylvania:CT75—5045 (NY75-3108) Do.

Rhode Island:CT75—5045 (NY75—3108) — Do.

T o r m p e o p p •AR-4013 (AL75-513i)____ J u ly 26, 1974.

AR—45 (TX75—4163 ) — — Sept. 20, 1974.AR-4013 (AL75-5131)____ J u ly 26,1974.TX75-4091 (TX75-4167) ;TX

75-4093 (TX75-4168) — May 16, 1975. TX75-4102 (TX75-4169) ;TX

75-4104 (TX75-4165); TX 75-4106 (TX75-4166) ___ May 23,1975.

TX75—4109 (TX75-4164) ;TX75-4110(TX75-4162) ___ May 30,1975.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 17th day of October 1975.

R ay J. Dolan, Assistant Administrator,

Wage and Hour Division.


MO

DIF

ICA

TIO

N

'DEC

ISION

#AL

75-1

069'

- M

od,

#2

(AO

FR 3

0389

- J

uly

18,

1975

) M

obile

Cou

nty,

Alab

ama

CHAN

GE:

Asb

esto

s wo

rker

s E

lect

rici

ans:

Ele

ctri

cian

s Ca

ble

splic

ers

Lath

ers

Spri

nkle

r fi

tter

?Fo

otno

te:

a.

2 Pa

id H

olid

ays:

D a

nd E

pr

ovid

ed t

he e

mpl

oyee

wo

rks

at l

east

1 d

ay o

ut

of t

he 3

wor

k da

ys p

rior

to

the

pai

d ho

liday

s an

d th

e fi

rst

work

day

aft

er

the

paid

hol

iday

s.

Hour

lyR

oH

i

$ 9.

AO

10.1

A 10

.39

9.08

9.

35

Frin

gm ß

.n.l

itl

Po

ym

.ntt

.395

.30

.30

.35

.50

.75

12+.

25

12+.

25

.35

.80

.125

.125

.02

l/10

ofl%

l/

10of

1%

.01

.08

MO

DIF

ICA

TIO

N

DECI

SION

NO.

AR75

-A07

3 -

Mod .

M

(A0

FR 1

5287

- A

pril

A, 1

975)

Un

ion a

nd O

uach

ita C

ount

ies,

Arka

nsas

CHAN

GE:

Spri

nkle

r fi

tter

s

B»

ie

Hour

lyRo

too

$9.1

5

DECI

SION

NO.

AR75

-A08

2 -

Mr»rt

, #3

(4

0 FR

174

52 -

Apr

il 18

, 19

75)

Seba

stia

n &

Craw

ford

Cou

nties

, Ar

kans

as

CHAN

GE:

Spri

nkle

r fi

tter

s$9

.15

Frin

ge B

en

efi

ts P

oym

ents

hu

r

.50

Nm

Iwi

Voc

otio

n kp

p T

.80

.08

.50

.80

-.08

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49941

MODI

FICA

TION

' P.

3

DECI

SION

# G

A75

-102

S -

Mod

. #2

.(1

+0 F

R 86

91 -

Feb

ruar

y 28

, 19

75)

Hal

l C

ount

y, G

eorg

ia

Cha

nge;

,A

ir c

ondi

tion

ing

mec

hani

c Sh

eet

met

al w

orke

rs

Basi

cHou

rlyRo

te*

Frin

ge B

enef

its P

oym

ents

-

H & W

Pen*

Ion*

Voca

tion

A»p.

T..

1+.95

1+.50

DECI

SION

# G

A75

-103

9 -

Mod

. #2

:(1

|0 P

R 16

1+71

- A

pril

11,

19

75)

Cha

ttaho

oche

e an

d M

usco

gee

Cou

ntie

s, G

eorg

ia

Cha

nge:

Shee

t m

etal

wor

kers

5-1+

0

j \

#

j |

|

MODI

FICA

TION

P.

4

DECI

SION

NO.

ID75

-512

Q -

Mod

. #1

(A

O FR

459

78 r

Oct

ober

3,

1975

) St

atew

ide,

Idah

o

Chan

ge;

Powe

r Eq

uipm

ent

Ope

rato

rs;

(Ben

ewah

, Bo

nner

-, Bo

unda

ry,

Clea

rwat

er,

Koo

tena

i,La

tah,

Lew

i s Ne

z Pe

rce,

Shos

hone

, an

d th

at

port

ion

of

Idah

o Co

.

Grou

p 1

Grou

p 2

Grou

p 3

Grou

p' 4

Grou

p 5

Grou

p 6

Bo

sic

i H

ou

rly (

Rote

s

Ba

ltic

Ho

f/’v

Ro

*i

Ba

sic

Ho

url

y

Rote

s

Frin

ge B

cncf

its

Pc»y

mer

its

H &

WPe

n* Io

nsV

ocat

ion

App

. Vr

.

ZONE

1*

ZONE

ZONE

3*

*

': |

1)$8

.05

$è.5

5$9

.00

.75

.85

.03

8.35

8.85

9.30

.75

.85

.03

8.90

9.40

9.85

.75

,85

.03

9 .o5

9.55

10.0

0.7

5.8

5.0

39.

20 '

’9.

7010

.15

.75

.85

.03

9.45

9.95

10.4

0 '

.75

.85

. 03

;9.

7010

.20

10.6

5.7

5 .

1..8

5• 0

3

★ZON

E 1;

W

ithin

a 1

5 m

ile r

adiu

s fro

m th

e ce

nter

of

the

follo

win

gC

ities

: Co

eur

d.! A

lene

and

Lewi

ston

in I

daho

and

Spo

kane

, W

ashi

ngto

n★Z

ONE

2;

From

a 1

5 to

45

mile

rad

ius

from

the

cen

ter

of t

he a

bove

na

med

Citi

es.

★ZON

E 3:

Ov

er a

45

mile

rad

ius

from

the

cen

ter

of t

he a

bove

nam

ed ;

— C

ities

,'

.FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49942 NOTICES

MODI

FICA

TION

P. 5

MODI

FICA

TION

P. 6

DECI

SION

#01

175-

2056

- M

od. #

3 •

. '

A^I

5T+7

l975

) *

Sta

tew

ide,

Ohi

o

Hea

vy a

nd H

ighw

ay C

onst

ruct

ion

LABO

RERS

GROU

P I

. ■GR

OUP

IIGR

OUP

III

,GR

OUP

IV

| f|

f |

GROU

P V

, ' •

FRIN

GE B

ENEF

ITS

FOR

ALL

ZONE

AND

AL

L CL

ASSI

FICA

TION

S $.

55 “

Hea

lth &

Wel

fare

.4

0 -

Pens

ion

•.1

05 -

App

rent

ice

Tra

inin

g

GROU

P I

Lab

orer

s (c

onst

ruct

ion)

, pl

ant

labo

rers

or

yard

men

,¡ri

ght-

of-w

ay L

abor

ers

land

scap

e la

bore

r >,

uti

lity

man

or

hand

yman

, jo

int

sett

er,

flagm

an

, ca

rpe

nter

hel

per,

wat

erpr

oofi

ng l

abor

er,

slu

rry

sea

l, s

eal

coat

ing,

sur

face

tre

at

men

t or

roa

d m

ix l

abor

er,r

ipra

p la

bore

r an

d gr

oute

r, a

spha

lt l

abor

er,

dum

p m

an

(bat

ch t

ruck

s),

guar

drai

l an

d fe

nce

inst

alle

rs,

mes

h ha

ndle

rs a

nd p

lace

rs,

con

cret

e cu

ring

app

lica

tor,

sca

ffol

d er

ecto

r.GR

OUP

II

Asp

halt

rake

r, c

oncr

ete

pudg

ier,

ket

tle

man

(pi

peli

ne),

all

mac

hine

dr

iven

too

ls,

mas

on t

ende

r, m

orta

r m

ixer

, sh

eeti

ng a

hd s

hori

ng m

an,

surf

ace

grin

der

man

, po

wer

bug

gy o

r po

wer

whe

elba

rrow

.GR

OUP

III

Form

set

ter,

bot

tom

man

, W

elde

r he

lper

(pi

peli

ne),

con

cret

e sa

w m

an,

cutt

ing

with

bur

ning

tor

ch,

pipe

laye

r, h

and

spik

er (

rail

road

), c

ar p

ushe

r (w

ith

out

air

), u

nder

grou

nd m

an (

wor

king

in

sew

er a

nd w

ater

line

, re

pair

ing

and

reco

nd

itio

ning

), t

unne

l la

bore

r (w

ithou

t ai

r) a

nd c

aiss

on,

coff

erda

m (b

elow

25

feet

de

ep),

air

trac

kand

wag

on d

rill

GROU

P TV

B

last

er,

pow

der

man

,muc

kers

, w

renc

her

(mec

hani

cal

join

ts a

nd u

tili

ty

pip

elin

e),

yam

er,

top

land

erGR

OUP

V C

urb

sett

er a

nd c

utt

er,

min

er w

ithou

t a

ir,

conc

rete

cre

w i

n t

unne

ls,

uti

lity

pip

elin

e ta

pper

, gu

nnite

noz

zle

man

, w

ater

line

cau

lker

ZONE

DEF

INIT

IONS

Zone

1

Cuy

ahog

a, G

eaug

a an

d La

ke C

ount

ies

Zone

2

Ash

tabu

la,

Eri

e, H

uron

, L

orai

n, L

ucas

, M

ahon

ing,

Med

ina,

Otta

wa,

Por

tage

, -S

tark

, Su

mm

it, T

rum

bull

and

Woo

d C

ount

ies

Zone

3

Rem

aind

er o

f C

ount

ies

Zone

IZo

ne I

IZo

ne I

IE

Basi

cBa

sic

Basi

cHo

urly

Hour

lyHo

urly

Rote

sRa

tes

Rate

s

$ 8

.23

8.

355

8.43

8.

58

8.88

* 7.

55

7.67

5 7.

75

•7.90

8.

20

$ 7.

12

7.24

5 7

.32

7

.47

7

.77

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49943

MODI

FICAT

IÓN

P.OH

IO 7

- FE

OPO

WER

EQUI

PMEN

T OP

ERAT

ORS

ZONE

I -

Colu

mbi

ana,

Mah

onin

g, an

d Tr

umbu

ll C

ount

ies.

ESosi

eHo

urly

Role,

Ffinç

e Ce n

e fi It

Paym

ents

H & W

Perni

o»«’

Voc o

f Ion

l.pp

. T».

CLAS

S I

$10.

67.5

0.6

0.1

3Cl

ASS

II

:9.

98.5

0.6

0.1

3CL

ASS

III

9.49

.50

.60

.13'

CI.A

5S I

V •

9.08

.50

.60

■ .1

3.Cl

ASS

V8.

98 *

.50

.60

.13

CLAS

S VI

10.9

4.5

0.6

0.1

3

DECI

SION

KO.

011

75-2

056

(CON

T'D)

M

ODIF

ICAT

ION

P.

8HE

AVY

& HI

GHW

AY P

OWER

EQU

IPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S

Zone

2 -

Ash

tabu

la,

Cuy

ahog

a, E

rie,

Gea

uga,

Lak

e, L

orai

n, M

edin

a, P

orta

ge,

and

Sttm

mit

Cou

ntie

s Zo

ne 3

~ R

emai

nder

of

Sta

teZO

NE 2

ZO

NE 3

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

. PO

WER

EQU

IPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S

CLAS

S I

- A

spha

lt p

lane

r h

eate

r, A

usti

n w

este

rn &

. si

mil

ar t

ype,

3ac

k ho

e, B

a.ch

’"

plan

t-po

rtab

le c

oncr

ete,

Per

a bu

ilde

r-au

tom

atic

, B

ack

fill

er w

/dra

g at

tach

men

t,B

oat

der

rick

, B

oat-

tug,

Bor

ing

mac

h.

atta

ched

to

tra

cto

r, P

ull

clau

, B

ulld

ozer

, 0

,11,

1,

road

bu

ild

er &

sim

ilar

typ

es,

Cab

le p

lace

r h

lay

er,

Car

rier

-sur

adu_

e,

Car

ryal

l -

scra

per

or s

coop

, C

hica

go b

oom

, C

ompa

ctor

w/b

lade

att

ache

d, C

oncr

ete

spre

ader

fin

ish

er c

omb.

, C

rane

, C

rane

-sta

tion

ary

or c

lim

bing

, C

rane

-ele

ctri

c ov

erhe

ad,

Gra

ne-s

ide

boom

, C

rane

-tru

ck,

Cra

ne-t

ower

, D

erri

ck-b

oom

, D

irr^

c.-i

-car

, D

iggo

r s - v

/he e

1 (n

ot-

tren

cher

or

road

wid

r.er

), D

oubl

e ni

ne,

Bra

g li

ne,

Dre

c^e,

B

rill

-Ker

ny o

r si

mil

ar t

ype,

Ele

otro

mat

ic,

For“

: li

ft,

Fra

nkie

pil

e, G

rada

l_,

Gra

der-

pow

er,

Gur

ry,

Gur

ry-s

elf

prop

elle

d, H

igh

lift

, no

ist-

nor.

ora^

.1,

ho_s

.-

6ta

tion

ary

& m

obile

tra

cto

r, H

oist

-2 o

r 3

arum

, Ja

ckal

l, J

umbo

cz.

cn.,

Xoc

al

or K

uhlm

an,

Lan

d-se

agoi

ng v

ehic

le,

Loa

der-

Ele

vati

ng,

Loa

der-

fron

t en

d,

wcc

cnot

ive,

M

echa

nic

as w

elde

r, M

etro

cli

p h

arve

ster

w/o

ocm

, M

ucki

ng m

ach.

, fa

ver

-asp

..ai

t i

fin

ish

ing

mac

h.,

Pav

er-r

oad

conc

rete

, P

aver

-sli

p f

orm

, P

lace

Cre

te m

ach,

.c

st

driv

er,-

Pow

er d

rive

n hy

drau

lic

pum

ps a

nd j

ack

s-d

rill

ing

, S

hove

l, Sp

ikem

ac.e

r^

Sto

necr

ushe

r, T

ie p

ull

er &

lea

der

, T

ie t

ampe

r, T

ract

or-d

oubl

e bo

om,

Tra

ctor

v/

/att

achm

ents

, T

ruck

s-bo

om,

Tru

ck-t

ire-

assi

gned

to

job,

Tre

nch

each

., T

unne

l m

achi

ne

(Mar

k 21

Jav

a or

sim

ilar

), W

hile

y .

• CLA

SS I

I -

Asp

halt

pla

nt,

3en

ding

mac

hine

, E

crin

g ea

ch.,

Chi

p ha

rves

ter

w/o

000

.-,.

clea

ning

Mac

h.-p

ipel

ine

type

, C

oatin

g M

ach.

-pip

elin

e ty

pe,

Con

cret

e b

elt

pla

cer,

co

ncre

te f

inis

her

, C

oncr

ete

plan

er,

or a

sph

alt.

Con

cret

e sp

read

er,

Siev

e.*o

r* *o

r.<

lift

.-w

alk

behi

nd,

Form

lin

e m

ach.

, G

reas

e tr

uck

op.,

Gro

ut p

ump,

Gun

nite

^mac

n.,

Huc

k b

olt

ing

Mac

h.,

Hyd

raul

ic s

caff

old

, P

avir

g br

eake

r, P

ipe

drea

m,

Pot

aire

can,

Po

wer

bro

om,

Ref

rige

rati

on p

lan

t, S

asge

n d

erri

ck,

Seed

ing

Mac

h.,

Sal

i-pr

ope—

ed

mob

ile v

ibra

tor

com

pact

or o

r ro

lle

r, H

ois

t-si

ngle

aru

m,

Soi

l st

abil

izer

(pu

mp

. ty

pe)

, Sp

ray

cure

Mac

h.-S

elf

prop

elle

d, S

taw

blo

wer

mac

h.,

Sub

-gra

aer,

i-

0'-

fiil

ish

er o

r br

oom

C.M

. or

sim

ilar

typ

e of

Tug

ger

Hoi

st

_

,■ C

LASS

III

- B

atch

pla

nt-j

ob r

elat

ed,

3o

ilo

r op

., C

ompr

esso

r (1

25 C

FH o

r o

ver

;,.

Cur

b b

uil

der

(se

lf p

rope

lled

), G

ener

ator

-ste

am,

Jack

-hyd

raul

ic-p

ower

dri

ven,

M

ixer

-con

cret

e, M

ulch

ing

Mac

h.-,

Pin

pu

ller

, P

ulv

eriz

er,

Pum

p, R

oad

fin

ish

ing

m

ach.

(p

ull

ty

pe)

, R

olle

r,S

aw-c

oncr

cte-

self

pro

pell

ed.

Sign

al-m

an,

spra

y cu

re

MA

ch.-m

otor

pow

ered

,Spr

eade

r (s

ide

dri

ver

sho

ulde

r at

tach

men

t),

Tra

ctor

, T

rcnc

hor-

fom

, W

ater

bla

ster

.

, .

CLAS

S TV

- B

rake

man

’, C

ompr

esso

r un

der

125C

FM,

Con

veyo

r, C

onve

yor

32 f

eet

or

unde

r ot

her

than

ser

vic

ing

’bri

ck l

ayer

s, D

eck

hand

, D

rill

wag

on,

fire

man

,G

ener

ator

set

s, l

leat

ers-

port

ablc

pow

er (

2 to

5)»

.

. 1

Hel

per-

mec

hani

c,

Jack

s H

ydra

ulic

(re

ailr

oad

),

Lad

avat

or,

Rol

ler

(v;a

lk b

c.ii

na-i

to

n or

ov

er),

Ste

am j

enny

* Sy

phon

s, V

ibra

tor-

gaco

lir.

e, W

eldi

ng n

ac¡v

ines

(-)

(fu

el b

urni

ng)

. -

- .

)CL

ASS

V -

Oil

erCL

ASS

VI

- R

igs-

pilo

dri

ving

or

cass

ion

type

..

CLAS

S A

CLAS

S B

CLAS

S C

CLAS

S D

CLAS

S E

Bas

icH

ourly

Rot

es

Dos

icHo

urly

Rote

s

Frin

ge B

onef

its P

aym

ents

H &

WP«

ns le

nsV

acal

i..A»

$10

.38

$ 9.

61;

.1+6

.80

10.2

89.

$2.1

*6 \

.80

9.2I

+8.1

+8.1

+6.8

08.

778

.05

.1+6

.80

7.73

6.81

+..

.1*6

.80

CLAS

S A

- A

ir c

ompr

esso

r on

ste

el e

rect

ion,

Asp

halt

plan

t en

gine

er (

Cle

vela

nd

Dis

tric

t on

ly),

Boi

ler

Op.

, co

mpr

esso

r or

gen

erat

or w

hen

mou

nted

on

rig

, C

able

- w

ays,

com

bina

tion

conc

rete

mix

er a

nd t

ower

, C

oncr

ete

plan

ts (

over

1+

yds.

cap

.),

Con

cret

e pu

mps

, C

rane

s (a

ll t

ypes

inc

. A

fram

es,

boom

tru

cks,

che

rry

pick

ers)

, D

erri

cks,

Dra

glin

es,

Dre

dge

(dip

per

clam

or

suct

ion)

, E

leva

tion

gra

der

or e

ucli

d lo

ader

, F

loat

ing

equi

pmen

t (a

l.l

type

s),

Hel

icop

ter

crew

(ho

ist

to w

inch

), H

oes

(all

typ

es),

Hoi

stin

g en

gine

s (i

nclu

ding

sha

ft &

tun

nel

wor

k),

Ind

ust

rial

typ

e tr

acto

r, J

et e

ngin

eer

drye

r (d

8 or

D9j

die

sol

trao

tor,

Loc

omot

ives

(st

anda

rd

guag

e),

Mai

nten

ance

Op.

Cla

ss A

, M

ixer

(pa

ving

sin

gle

or d

oubl

e dr

um),

Muc

king

m

ach.

, M

ulti

ple

scra

per,

pil

edri

ving

mac

h.

(all

typ

es )

, Po

wer

sho

vel,

Qua

d 9

(dou

ble

push

er),

Ref

rige

rati

ng m

ach,

(f

reez

er o

pera

tion

), R

otar

y d

rill

on

cais

son

wor

k, s

lip

for

m p

aver

, To

wer

der

rick

s, T

ree

shre

dder

, T

renc

h m

ach.

(ove

r 2l

+" w

ide)

, T

ruck

mou

nted

con

cret

e pu

mp,

Tug

boa

t, T

unne

l m

ach.

, M

inin

g 1

mac

h.,

Whe

el e

xcav

ator

CLAE

S B

- A

spha

lt pa

ver,

Aut

omat

ic s

ubgr

ade

mac

h.

self

pro

pell

ed (

CMI

type

),B

orin

g m

ach.

Op.

(m

ore

than

1+8

"),

Bul

ldoz

ers,

End

load

er,

Kol

man

Loa

der

(pro

duc

tio

n t

ypo

dir

t),

Lead

gre

ase

man

, M

aint

enan

ce O

p.,

Cla

ss B

(in

Zon

e 2

Port

age

& Su

mm

it C

os.

only

), P

ower

gra

der,

Pow

er s

crap

er,

Push

Cat

, T

renc

h m

ach.

(2

i+"

wid

e &

unde

r)CL

ASS

C -

Air

com

pres

sor

on t

unne

l w

ork

(low

pre

ssur

e),

Asp

halt

plan

t en

gine

er,

Loco

mot

ive

(nar

row

gua

ge),

Con

cret

e m

ixer

s (m

ore

than

1 b

ag c

ap.)

, M

ixer

s (1

bag

ca

p. -

sid

e lo

ader

), P

ower

bo

iler

ove

r 15

lb

. pr

essu

re,

Pum

p O

p. i

nst

alli

ng

and

op

erat

ing

wel

l po

ints

, Pu

mps

(V1

4 ov

er d

isch

arge

), R

olle

rs (

asph

alt)

Uti

lity

Op.

(s

mal

l eq

uipm

ent)

, W

eldi

ng m

ach.

¿ge

nera

tors

.CL

ASS

D -

Bac

k fi

lle

rs,

Bar

(jo

int

& m

esh

inst

alli

ng

mac

h.),

Bat

ch p

lan

t, B

orin

g,

mac

h. O

p.

(1+8

" or

les

s),

Bul

l fl

oat

s, B

urla

p &

curi

ng m

ach.

, C

ompr

esso

rs (

por

ta

ble

, se

wer

, hv

y &

hwy.

)‘, C

oncr

ete

plan

t (1+

yd.

& u

nder

cap

.),

conc

rete

saw

(m

ulti

ple)

, C

onve

yors

(H

wy,

), C

rush

er,

Dec

khan

d, D

rill

hig

hway

(w

/int

egra

l po

wer

), Fa

rm t

ype

trac

tors

w/a

ttach

men

ts,

Fin

ishi

ng m

ach.

, Fi

rem

an (

flo

atin

g e

quip

men

t, a

ll t

ypes

), F

ork

lift

(hw

y.),

For

m t

renc

hers

, H

ydro

ham

mer

, H

ydro

, see

der,

Pav

em

ent

brea

ker,

Pla

nt m

ixer

s, P

ost

driv

er,

Pos

t ho

le d

igge

r (p

ower

Sta

ger)

, Po

wer

br

ush

burn

er,

Pow

er f

orm

han

dlin

g E

quip

., R

oad

wid

enin

g tr

ench

er,

Rol

lers

(br

ick,

gr

ade,

mac

adam

), se

lf p

rope

lled

pow

er s

prea

der,

sel

f-pr

opel

led

pow

er s

ubgr

ader

, St

eam

fir

emen

, T

ract

or (

pull

ing

shee

pfoo

t ro

ller

or

grad

er,

Vib

rato

ry c

ompa

ctor

(w

/int

egra

l po

wer

).CL

ASS

E -

Brum

fir

emen

(as

phal

t p

lan

t),

Hel

pers

, In

boar

d-ou

tboa

rd m

otor

boa

t-

laun

ch,

Oil

hea

ters

(as

phal

t p

lan

t),

Oil

ers,

Pow

er d

rive

n h

eate

rs,

Pum

ps (

unde

r 1+

" di

scha

rge)

Sig

nalm

en,

Tir

e re

pair

men

.

FED

ERA

L RE

GIS

TER,

VO

L.

40,

NO

. 20

7—FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TOB

ER 2

4,

1975

49944 NOTICES

DECI

SION

NO. 0

1175

-205

6 •

TRUC

K DR

IVER

SZO

NE I

-CU

YAHO

GA,

LAKE

&GE

AUGA

CO

UNTI

ESCL

ASS

I ,~

CLAS

S II

CL

ASS

HI

CL^S

S IV

MODI

FICA

TION

P. 9

I'CQ

NT'

D)'

0H1°

9~T

DOo

slcHo

urly

Rotel

Frin

ge O

onof

H L W

Pan«

Ions

Voca

tion

Apr.

Tf. ,

$7,1

5*1

9.00

*22.

00b&

c7.

30al

9.00

*22.

00bi

-c7.

53al

9.00

*22.

00bi

c7.

65*1

9.00

*22.

00b&

c

PAID

HOL

IDAY

S (V

.H5H

S AP

PLIC

ABLE

)»A

-NcV

l'car

's D

ay;

b-H

emor

ial

Day

; C

-Ind

epen

denc

e D

ay;

D-L

abor

Day

; , E

-Tha

nksg

ivin

g D

ay;

F-C

hris

traa

s D

ay.

' ,

. '

, . I

FOCT

NOTF

.Sa.

Pe

r- w

eek

per

empl

oyee

_

/. y

b. O

no w

eek1

s pa

ic v

acat

ion

for

one

year

of

serv

ice;

tw

o w

eeks

fo

r fi

ve y

ears

; th

ree

wee

ks f

or t

en y

ears

and

fou

r w

eeks

fo

r se

vent

een

yea

rs.

c. S

even

pai

d ho

lida

ys•

A th

roug

h F

plus

Nat

iona

l E

lect

ion

Day

,

CLAS

SIFI

CATI

ON»

DEF

INIT

ION

S .

_CL

ASS

I -

Str

aig

ht

and

dum

ps i

nclu

ding

asp

halt

, w

areh

ouse

men

, st

raig

ht

fuel

,CL

ASS

il

- Se

mi

fuel

, se

mi

pole

dri

vers

hau

ling

ste

el p

ipe

and

sem

i tr

acto

rd

riv

ers.

‘

■ .

. .

. .

. ,

CLAS

S II

I -

Rca

dy-m

ix,

agit

ato

r or

bul

k co

ncre

te d

riv

ers,

dry

bat

ch t

ruck

. CL

ASS

IV

- E

ucli

ds,

dar

ts,

tank

asp

halt

spr

eade

rs,

low

boy

s, c

arry

-all

dri

ver,

T

tolu

’nar

ocke

rs,

hi-

lift

s, f

ork

lift

s,

extr

a lo

ng t

rail

ers

and

sem

i po

le t

rail

er

s ex

cept

whe

n ha

ulin

g st

eel

pipe

, do

uble

hoo

k-up

tra

cto

r tr

ail

ers

inc

ludi

ng

team

tra

ck a

nd r

ailr

oad

sid

ing,

"se

mi

trac

tor

and

tri-

axle

tra

ile

r,

tand

em

trac

tor

and

tand

em t

rail

er

and

tri-

axle

tra

ile

r,

tag

alon

g tr

ail

ers

, ex

pand

ab

le t

rail

ers

, lo

ads

requ

irin

g ro

ad p

erm

its. FE

DERA

L RE

GIST

ER,

VOL.

40,

NO.

207—

1

MODI

FICA

TION

, P.

‘10

DECI

SION

NO.

0H

75-2

056

> (g

OHIO

6-T

D

MDo

s leFr

înçc D

o not

ts Po

ymen

t*'

iHo

vel/

ZONE

TI

-Rem

aind

er o

f th

e St

ate

fioici

It & w

Per.t

lon»

'' V

ocatio

nAp

p. Tr

. |

CLAS

S I

$7.2

7al

6.00

aö.O

O;

CU

SS I

I .

.7.

32al

6.00

aö.0

0CL

ASS

HI

' '

7 • 37

alö.

OO

aö.O

OC

USS

IV

7. 47

alö.

OO

aö.O

O1

CLAS

S V

7.57

alö.

OO

aö.O

OCL

ASS

VI

-7.

74,

alö.

OO

aö.O

OFO

OTNO

TE:

a.

Per

wee

k pe

r em

ploy

ee ’

#CL

ASS

IFIC

ATI

ON

DEF

INIT

ION

S~

d w

heel

ser

vice

tru

cks,

lj

whj

iel

dum

p tr

ucks

, ba

tch

truc

ks,

oil

d

istr

ibu

tors

, as

ph

alt

dis

trib

uto

rs.

CLAS

S II

- T

ande

ms tr

acto

r tr

uck

s, poie

tra

ile

rs,

fuel

tru

cks.

CLAo

S IV

-

All

tru

cks

fiv

e ax

le a

nd o

ver.

ph

ASo

V

- A

spha

lt-o

il' s

pray

bar

man

whe

n op

erat

ed f

rom

cab

(J

.MSS

VI

- E

ucli

d w

agon

s, L

ucli

d en

d du

mps

, lo

w b

oys,

he

avy

duty

equ

ipm

ent

over

It

cu.

yds.

ca

paci

ty w

hen

used

exc

lusi

vely

fo

r tr

ansp

ort

atio

n,

t-uc

k m

echa

nic»

.

V OCT

OBER

24,

197

5

NOTICES 49945

MODI

FICA

TION

P.

11

<40

FR 4

5990

- O

ctob

er 3

, 19

75)

North

ampt

on C

ount

y, Pe

nnsy

lvan

ia

Chan

ge:

Boile

rmak

er

Bas

icH

ourl

yR

otes

Fri

nge

Ben

efit

s P

oyro

ents

,

H &

WP

ensi

ons

Voc

atio

n*P

P- T

r.

$11.

05.6

51

.00

.02

Dec

ision

0-P

A-75

-31O

2 -

Mod

. t 1

a

11.0

5

8.17

.65

.25

1.0

0

.50

.02

(40

FR -

459

93 -

Oct

ober

3,

1975

) La

ckaw

anna

, Su

sque

hann

a, W

ayne

an

d W

yomi

ng C

ount

ies,

Penn

sylv

ani

Chan

ge:

Boile

rmak

ers

Labo

rers

:•

Sout

hern

Par

t of

Wyo

ming

Cou

nty:

M

ason

ten

der

& sc

affo

ld

build

ers

Dec

ision

No.

PA-7

5-PA

-310

4 -

Mod.

* 1

'. 65

1.0

0.0

2

(40

FR 4

5998

- O

ctob

er 3

, 19

75)

Lehi

gh C

ount

y, Pe

nnsy

lvan

ia

Chan

ge:

Boile

rmak

ers

11.0

5

Dec

ision

No.

PA-7

5-30

17 -

Mod

. #1

11.0

58.

55.6

5.4

01

.00

.85

.02

<40

FR 4

5996

- O

ctob

er 3

, 19

75)

Scht

tylk

lll C

ount

y, Pe

nnsy

lvan

ia

Chan

ge:

Boile

rmak

ers

Plas

tere

rs

Dec

ision

No.

PA-7

5-30

27 -

Mod

. #

4

11.0

5.6

51

.00

.02

(40

FR 1

4268

- M

arch

28,

197

5)

Cum

berla

nd,

Daup

hin,

Per

ry,

Juni

ta

New

Cumb

erlan

d De

pot

in

York

Cou

nty,

Penn

sylv

ania

Chan

ge:

Boile

rmak

ers

7

FED

ERAL

REG

ISTE

R, V

OL.

40,

NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, O

CTO

BER

24,

1975

49946 NOTICES

SUPE

RSE

DE

AS

DE

CIS

ION

STATES:

Alabama, A

rkansas, F

lorida (

West o

f the

COUNTIES:

Gulf C

oast Area

Auci

lla

River),

Kentucky,

Louisiana,

Mis

siss

ippi

, M

issou

ri,

Tenn

esse

e an

d Te

xas

DECI

SION

NO.:

AL75

—513

1 DA

TE:

Date

of P

ublic

atio

nSu

pers

edes

Dec

ision

No.

AR-4

013

date

d Ju

ly 2

6, 1

974

in 3

9 FR

273

97

DESC

RIPT

ION

OF W

ORK:

Dred

ging

alo

ng t

he G

ulf

Coas

t ar

ea i

nclu

ding

the

M

issis

sippi

Riv

er -a

nd t

ribu

tari

es t

o th

e Oh

io R

iver

.

Derr

ick o

pera

tors

Do

zer

oper

ator

s M

arsh

cra

ne o

pera

tors

M

arsh

cra

ne o

ilers

HYDR

AULI

C DR

EDGI

NG:

Chief

coo

k Se

cond

coo

k Co

ok h

elpe

r :

Jani

tor

(Cab

in b

oy)

| Ha

ndym

an•D

redg

es u

nder

16

inch

es:

! Le

ve rm

an2n

d as

sist

ant

engi

neer

Dr

edge

ten

der

oper

ator

'

Deck

hand

j

Oile

r | W

elder

|Dre

dges

16

inch

es a

nd o

ver:

Le

ve m

anDr

edge

ten

der

oper

ator

1s

t as

sist

ant

engi

neer

2n

d as

sist

ant

engi

neer

3r

d as

sist

ant

engi

neer

j D

eckh

and

| Sho

rema

n Tr

uck

driv

er

Oile

r I W

elder

Fi

rem

en

BUCK

ET "D

REDG

ING:

Leve

rman

Oile

rHa

ndym

anDe

ckha

ndCo

ok

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES j 49947

SUPE

RSED

EAS

DECI

SION

STAT

E:

Con

nect

icut

, De

lawa

re,

Main

e, M

aryla

nd.

Mas

sach

uset

ts,

New

Ham

pshi

re,

New

Jers

ey,

New

York

, Pe

nnsy

lvan

ia a

nd R

hode

Isla

ndDE

CISIO

N NU

MBER

: NY

75-3

108

DATE

: Da

te of

Pub

licat

ion

Supe

rsed

es D

ecisi

on N

o. CT

75-5

045

date

d 4-

4-75

In

40 F

R 15

294.

DESC

RIPT

ION

OF W

ORK:

All

dred

ging

on

the

Atla

ntic

Coa

st fro

m th

e Ca

nadi

an

Bord

er t

o th

e So

uthe

rly

Bord

er o

f th

e St

ate

of M

aryla

nd a

nd t

ribu

tary

wat

ers

empt

ying

Int

o th

e A

tlant

ic O

cean

, th

e C

& D

Cana

l, Ba

ltim

ore

City

and

Ba

ltim

ore

Coun

ty,

Mar

yland

, bu

t ex

clud

ing

Bosto

n Ha

rbor

and

the

Che

sape

ake

Bay.

Basi

cFr

inge

Ben

efit

t Pa

ymen

ts

Rote

sH

& W

Pens

ions

Voco

tlon

App.

Tr.

Dipp

er a

nd C

lam

shell

Dre

dges

:O

pera

tor

$ 8.

85.3

5.3

56%

+eCr

anem

an8.

58.3

5.3

56%

+aDe

ckha

nd;

tug

deck

hand

6. 72

.35

.35

67.+a

Engi

neer

•8.8

0.3

5.3

56%

+aFi

rem

an;

oile

r6.

95.3

5.3

56Z

+aM

ainte

nanc

e en

gine

er8.

42.3

5.3

56%

+aM

ate7.

74.3

5.3

56%

+aRo

dman

; sco

wman

6.62

.35

.35

6%+a

Weld

erH

ydra

ulic

Dred

ges:

8.26

.35

.35

6%+a

Boile

r; d

redg

e ca

rpen

ter;

bla

ck-

smith

; el

ectr

icia

ns;

weld

er8.

26.3

5.3

56%

+aDe

rrick

ope

rato

r8.

58.3

5.3

567

.+aDe

ckha

nd;

shor

eman

6.62

.35

.35

6%+a

Engi

neer

8.58

.35

.35

6%+a

Fire

man

; oi

ler

6.95

.35

.35

6%+a

1 Le

verm

an8.

69.3

5.3

56%

+at

Mai

nten

ance

eng

inee

r8.

42.3

5.3

56%

+ai

Spid

er b

arge

ope

rato

r8.

16.3

5.3

56%

+aTu

g de

ckha

nd6.

72.3

5, .

356%

+aM

ate7.

74.3

5.3

56%

+aTu

g Bo

ats

over

400

H.P

. :Tu

g en

gine

er7.

81.3

5.3

56%

+aTu

g de

ckha

nd

. D

rill

Boat

s:6.

72.3

5.3

56%

+a

Engi

neer

s9.

01.2

5.2

5b

Blas

ters

9.13

.25

.25

bFi

rem

en8.

66.2

5.2

5b

j D

rille

rs,

Weld

ers

or M

achi

nists

9.02

.25

.25

b!

Oile

rs

j PAID

HOLI

DAYS

:

8.48

.25

.25

b

jA-N

ew Y

ear'

s Da

y; B-

Mem

orial

Day

; (

-Inde

penc

»nee

Day

;D-

Labo

r 1a

y; E

-Tha

nks g

ivin

gDa

y; F-

Chris

tmas

Day

.

FOOT

NOTE

S :a.

H

olid

ays:

A

thro

ugh

F; P

lus

Wssh

ingt

on'3

Birt

hda

t and

Vet«

ran'

s Da

b.

8 pa

id h

olid

ays,

A th

roug

h F

pus

Wash

in;t

on's

Birth

day

an«

Vete

ran

s Da

y;6-

day

s va

catio

n wi

th p

ay f

or10

4 da

ys)f

ser

vie

>,

one

ad<

ition

alay

of

vaca

tion

with

pay

for

eac

h ad

d:tio

nal

212/

3 da

ysof

ser

vie,

all

iron

eca

lenda

r ye

ar.

Empl

oyee

s no

tua

llfyi

ngfo

r va

ca:lo

n to

ric

eive

one

day'

sva

catio

n wi

th p

ay f

or e

ach

ful!

24 d

ays

j»f s

ervi

e>

in o

neal

enda

rea

r.

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 4

0, N

O. 2

07—

FRID

AY,

OCTO

BER

24,

1975

49948 NOTICES

SUPE

RSED

EAS

DECI

SION

STAT

S: Fl

orid

a CO

UNTI

ES:

*See

belo

wDE

CISI

ON N

UMBE

R: FL

75-1

101+

DA

TE:

Date

of

Publ

icat

ion

Supe

rsed

es D

ecisi

on N

o.:

AR-1

+000

dat

ed J

uly

5, 1

974,

in 3

9 FR

21+

775

DESC

RIPT

ION

OF W

ORK:

Res

iden

tial

cons

truc

tion

cons

istin

g of

sin

gle

fam

ily h

omes

and

gard

en t

ype

apar

tmen

ts up

to

and

incl

udin

g 1+

stor

ies.

#Cou

nties

:C

itru

s, H

erna

ndo,

Hill

sbor

ough

Pa

sco,

Pin

ella

s, &

Sum

ter

Air

con

diti

onin

g m

echa

nics

Bri

ckla

yers

Car

pent

ers

Cem

ent

mas

ons

Dry

wal

l fi

nish

ers

Dry

wal

l ha

nger

Ele

ctri

oian

sG

lazi

ers

Insu

lati

on i

nst

alle

rs

I Ir

onw

orke

rs'

! L

abor

ers:

i L

abor

ers

| M

ason

ten

ders

P

aint

ers,

bru

sh

Pai

nter

s,

spra

y '

Pla

ster

ers

i Pl

umbe

rs

I R

oofe

rs

I K

ettle

men

|

Shee

t m

etal

wor

kers

S

oft

floo

r la

yers

T

ile

sett

ers

Truc

k dr

iver

s

POW

ER E

QUIP

MEN

T OP

ERAT

ORS:

Bac

khoe

B

ulld

ozer

C

ompa

ctor

C

rane

& d

ragl

ine

Fork

lif

t Fr

ont

end

load

er

Gra

der

Tra

ctor

Bos

ieH

ourl

yR

otes

Fri

nge

Ben

efit

s P

oym

ents

H &

WPe

nsio

nsV

ocot

lon

Afp

.Tr.

1+.68

6.98

U-97

6.5

0

8.16

9.50

5

.60

6.

25

5.00

1+

.61

3.52

1+.

28

U.73

U.

50

6.1+1

5.

71

U.50

1+

.00

6.6 3

7.U

1 ,

7.13

3.52

3.96

1».1U

3.6

0li.

75U.

l+o3

.60

3.6

2l+

.oo

%1%

.05

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

SUPE

RSED

EAS

DECI

SION

STAT

E:

Ken

tuck

y CO

UNTY

: Se

e be

low

*DE

CISI

ON N

UMBE

R:

KY

75-1

105

DATE

: D

ate

of P

ubli

cati

onSu

pers

edes

Dec

isio

n N

o.:

AQ-U

066

date

d Fe

brua

ry 1

, 19

71+

in 3

9 PR

1+3

0?

DESC

RIPT

ION

OF W

ORK:

R

esid

enti

al c

onst

ruct

ion

cons

isti

ng o

f si

ngle

fam

ily

hom

es a

nd g

arde

n ty

pe a

part

men

ts u

p to

and

inc

ludi

ng U

sto

ries

.

«Cou

ntie

s:_

Bat

h, B

ourb

on,

Cla

rk,

Fay

ette

, H

arri

son,

Jes

sam

ine,

M

adis

on,

Mon

tgom

ery,

S

cott

, &

Dos

icFri

nge Be

ne fi

s Pa

ymen

ts

Rot

esH4

WPe

nsio

nsV

ocat

ion

*PP.

T>W

oodf

ard.

Air

con

diti

onin

g m

echa

nic

Bri

ckla

yer

Car

pent

ers

Cem

ent

mas

ons

Dry

wal

l fi

nish

ers

i D

ryw

all

hang

er

Ele

ctri

cian

s In

sula

tion

in

stal

ler

Lab

orer

s:L

abor

ers

'H

od c

arri

ers

! M

ason

ten

ders

j

Pip

elay

ers

Pai

nter

sPl

umbe

rs

• %

Roo

fers

1 Sh

eet

met

al w

orke

rs

Sof

t fl

oor

laye

rs

! T

ile

sett

ers

j T

ruck

dri

vers

POW

ER E

OUIIM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S:

Back

hoe

Bul

ldoz

er

Gra

der

Mec

hani

c O

iler

T

ract

orT

renc

hing

mac

hine

5.0

0

' 5.

37

U.0

9

1+.51

+It.

65

1+. 1+

65.

00

k.o

o

2.97

3.

00

3.00

5.

00

3-85

5.

00

U.0

0

it.ilt

it.

Sit

5.0

05

.00

3.2

53

.25

U.

10lt.

003

.00

it.

10

3.5

0

o Z o H n m VI

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

SUTE

RSED

EAS

DE

CIS

ION

STAT

E:

Mas

sach

uset

ts

COUN

TY:

Ber

kshi

reDE

CISI

ON N

O.:

MA

75-2

118

DATE

: D

ate

of P

ubli

cati

onSu

pers

edes

Dec

isio

n N

O.:

MA

75-2

070,

dat

ed M

ay 9

» 19

75 i

n 1+

0 PR

20

581

DESC

RIPT

ION

OF W

ORK:

B

juild

ing

cons

truc

tion

(ex

clud

ing

sing

le f

amily

hom

es a

nd

gard

en t

ype

apar

tmen

ts u

p to

and

inc

ludi

ng 1

+ st

ori

es),

hea

vy a

nd H

ighw

ay

cons

truc

tion

.

BUIL

DING

, HE

AVY

& HI

GHW

AY

CONS

TRUC

TION

'B

osic

Hou

rly

Rot

es

Fri

nge

Ben

efit

s P

aym

ents

H &

WPe

nsio

nsV

ocat

ion

App

. Tr

.

ASBE

STOS

WOR

KERS

$ 9-

60

,:$

u.7

5.0

1BO

ILER

MAK

ERS

10.0

0.6

0,1

036

.01

BRIC

KLAY

ERS,

CEM

ENT

MAS

ONS,

MARB

LEM

ASON

S, PL

ASTE

RERS

, ST

ONE!

MAS

ONS,

*TE

RRAZ

ZO W

ORKE

RS A

ND T

ILE

SETT

ERS:

Twps

. of

Ada

mp,

N.

Ada

ms,

Che

shir

e, F

lori

da,

Savo

y,C

lark

sbur

g an

d W

illia

mst

own

9.60

Twps

. of

Bec

ket,

Otis

and

San

disf

ield

9-55

.55

.80

.03

Rem

aind

er o

f C

ount

y7-

03.1+

0.3

0! C

ARPE

NTER

S&

SOFT

FLO

OR L

AYER

S:N

. A

dam

s,C

lark

sbur

gh,

Savo

y,F

lori

da,

Adam

s an

d W

illia

mst

own

8.53

5.1+

0•5

0•3

75.01

+R

emai

nder

of C

ount

y8.6

1+.5

5.6

5.01

+EL

ECTR

IC IA

NS9.1

1+•1+

519

Î+.I+

9.0

2Iel

eva

tor

CONS

TRUC

TORS

‘ 9.

505

.2+2+

5.2

933

+a+b

.02

¡ELE

VATO

R CO

NSTR

UCTO

RS H

ELPE

RS70

#JR

.1+45

.29

336+

a+b

.02

■ELE

VATO

R CO

NSTR

UCTO

RS H

ELPE

RS(P

ROB.

)5C

$JR

.14+5

.29

35+a

+b.0

2GL

AZIE

RS9.

U5

.1+7

.1+5

IRON

WOR

KERS

, ST

RUCT

URAL

, OR

NAME

NTAL

& RE

INFO

RCIN

G8.8

1+.5

5.8

5.01

+LA

BORE

RS (

Bui

ldin

g):

Lab

orer

s,ca

rpen

ter

tend

ers,

ce-

men

c fi

nis

her

ten

der,

& w

reck

ing

labo

rers

7.50

. .5

0.1+

5.1

0Ja

ckha

mm

er o

p.,

pave

men

t br

eake

rs,

wag

on d

rill

s, a

spha

lt r

aker

s,ca

rbid

eco

re d

rill

ing

mac

hine

,ch

ain

saw

ops

., p

ipel

ayer

s, b

arco

type

jum

ping

tam

pers

, la

ser

beam

ops,

con

cret

e pu

mp

ops.

, m

ason

tend

ers,

mor

tar

mix

ers,

rid

e-on

mot

oriz

ed b

uggy

7.75

.50

.1+5

.10

Air

tra

ck;

bloc

k pa

vers

.; ra

mm

ers

curb

set

ters

8.00

.50

•1+5

.10

Bla

ster

s,po

wed

erm

en8.

25•5

0.1+

5.1

01 L

ATHE

RS8.1

+5.1+

5.2

5.0

1LE

AD B

URNE

RS9.

25.3

5c

.01

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—I

Page

2

DECI

SION

NO. M

A75-2

118

Bos

icF

ring

e B

enef

it*

Poy

men

tsH

ourl

y R

otes

'

H &

WP

ensi

ons

Voc

otlo

nA

pp.

Tf.

LINE

CON

STRU

CTIO

N:Li

nem

en$1

0.16

.1+0

1#f

3/8o

f1%

Equi

pmen

t O

pera

tor.

9.1+8

.1+0

1#f

3/8o

f1#

Dri

ver

Gro

undm

en7.

32.1+

01*

f3/

8of1

$M

ARBL

E SE

TTER

S' &

TIL

E SE

TTER

S' HE

LPER

S M

ILLW

RIGH

TS:'

8.00

Che

shir

e, S

avoy

, Ne

w A

shfo

rd,

Ada

ms,

Flo

rida

, N

. A

dam

s, C

lark

sbur

g, W

illia

mst

own-

9.15

.60

•65

.07

■Rem

aind

er o

f C

ount

y PA

INTE

RS:

9.20

.60

.65

.07

! B

rush

and

Rol

ler

8.82

.50

.35

.03

'Spr

ay11

.76

.66

.1+6

67.01

+Sw

ing

stag

e un

der

1+0'

and

stee

l9.

007

.50

.35

.03

Swin

g st

age

over

1+0

' an

d st

eel

9.32

.50

.35

.03

PILE

DRIV

ERM

EN1 P

LUM

BERS

AND

STE

AMFI

TTER

S:9.

50•5

0.5

0

j A

dam

s, C

lars

burg

, F

lori

da,

N.!

Ada

ms,

Savo

y, W

illia

mst

own,

&,

nort

hern

hal

f of

Che

shir

e, N

ewA

shfo

rdB

ecke

t, O

tis,

San

disf

ield

8.15

.65

.50

d+c

.05

(Plu

mbe

rs o

nly)

Bec

ket,

Oti

s, S

andi

sfie

ld,

& N

ew9.

68.6

8

00VA

g.0

5

Bos

ton

(Ste

amfi

tter

s)9.

88•5

7.7

0

OCO

.02

Rem

aind

er o

f C

ount

y RO

OFER

S:9.1

+9.1(

6.5

0.0

5

Com

posi

tion,

dam

p an

d w

atep

roof

8.91+

5.61

+.6

6S

late

, T

ile

and

prec

ast

conc

rete

9.60

.61+

.66

SHEE

T M

ETAL

WOR

KERS

9.11

.75

• 97

.02

SPRI

NKLE

R FI

TTER

S10

.53

.50

.80

.08

Wel

ders

- r

ecei

ve r

ate

pres

crib

edfo

r cr

aft

perf

orm

ing

oper

atio

n to

w

hich

wel

ding

is

inci

dent

al.

tY,

OCTO

BER

24,

1975

NOTICES 49951

Pam

e 3

DIS

C 11

ION

HO.

MA7

5-211

8P

ag

e

4

buil

ding

CON

STRU

CTIO

ND

oii

cF

ring

e B

enef

its

Pay

men

ts

DECI

SION

NO

MA7

5-211

8PO

WER

EQUI

PMEN

T OP

ERAT

ORS:

Rol

esH

& W

Pens

lens

Voc

oflo

nII

.

CLAS

S I

$

9.3

5.6

0.7

5a

. .0

5CL

ASS

II9

.15

.60

.75

'

a.0

5PA

ID H

OLID

AYS

CLAS

S II

I8

.95

.60

.75

a.0

5A-

New

Yea

r's

Day;

B-M

emor

ial D

ay;

C-In

depe

nden

ce .D

ay;

D-La

bor

Day;

CLAS

S IV

-

8.5

8.6

0.7

5a

.05

E-Th

anks

givi

ng D

ay;

F-Ch

ristm

as D

ayCL

ASS

V7

.90

.60

.75

a.0

5*

CLAS

S VI

_

..7

.U5

.60

.75

a.0

5FO

OTNO

TES:

CLAS

S VI

I •

6.7

2.6

0.7

5a

.05

a.

Empl

oyer

con

trib

utes

of

bas

ic h

ourl

y ra

te f

or 5

yea

rs o

r mo

re o

f se

rvic

e or

2$

of b

asic

hou

rly

rate

for

6 m

onth

s to

5 y

ears

of

serv

ice

as v

acat

ion

pay

cred

it.

b.

Hol

iday

s:

A th

roug

h F

c.

Hol

iday

s: A

thr

ough

F,

Was

hing

ton'

s Bi

rthd

ay,

Good

Frid

ay a

nd C

hrist

mas

Ev

e pr

ovid

ing

empl

oyee

has

wor

ked

1+5 f

ull

days

dur

ing

the

120

cale

ndar

da

ys p

rior

to

the

holid

ay a

nd t

he r

egul

ar S

ched

uled

wor

k da

ys i

mm

edia

tely

pr

eced

ing

and

follo

win

g th

e ho

liday

.

d.

Hol

iday

s: A

thr

ough

P,

plus

Goo

d Fr

iday

, V

eter

ans'

Day,

Was

hing

ton'

s Bi

rthd

ay,

and

Colu

mbus

Day

e.

Empl

oyer

con

trib

utio

n of

$1.

00 p

er h

our

to a

sav

ings

fun

d.

f.

Paid

Hol

iday

s:

A th

roug

h P,

Was

hing

ton'

s Bi

rthd

ay,

and

Patr

iots

Day

pr

ovid

ing

empl

oyee

has

wor

ked

for

a pe

riod

of

five

(5)

work

ing

days

pri

or

to t

he h

olid

ay a

nd t

he r

egul

ar s

ched

uled

wor

k da

ys i

mm

edia

tely

pre

cedi

ng

and

follo

win

g th

e ho

liday

. Th

ere

is a

lso

one

float

ing

holid

ay p

er y

ear.

6»

July

1+th

and

Lab

or D

ay p

rovi

ded

work

er i

s em

ploy

ed 7

day

s pr

ior

to

holid

ay.

I !

/

CLAS

SIFI

CATI

ONS

CLAS

S I

Shov

els,

Cran

es,

Hyd

raul

ic Cr

anes

10

ton

capa

city

or

over

, D

ragl

ines

, D

erri

cks,

Ele

vato

rs w

ith C

hica

go B

oom,

Bak

choe

s, G

rada

lls,

Ele

vatin

g G

rade

rs,

Pile

Dri

ving

Rig

s, Co

ncre

te R

oad

Pave

rs,'

thre

e dr

um H

oist

ing

and

Tren

chin

g M

ahicn

es,

Bel

t-ty

pe L

oade

rs,

Fron

t En

d Lo

ader

-5 y

ards

or

over

, Du

al D

rum

Pave

r, Au

tom

atic

Gra

der

(i.

e. C

.M.I.

) Co

mbi

natio

n Ba

ck H

oe-L

oade

r-3/

U ya

rd

hoe

or o

ver

CLAS

S II

Ro

tary

Dri

ll (w

ith m

ount

ed c

ompr

esso

r),

com

pres

sor

hous

e (

3 to

6

com

pres

sors

), Ro

ck a

nd E

arth

Bor

ing

Mac

hine

s (e

xclu

ding

McC

arth

y 'an

d si

mila

r d

rill

s),

Gra

ders

, Fr

ont

End

Load

ers-l

+ ya

rds

to S

i ya

rds,

two

Drum

Hoi

sts,

p-igb

For

k L

ifts

with

cap

acity

of

15 f

eet

and

over

, Sc

rape

rs-2

1 ya

rds

and

over

(s

truc

k lo

ad),

Soni

c Ha

mmer

Con

sole.

CLAS

S II

I Co

mbi

natio

n Ba

ckho

e-Lo

ader

-up

to 3

/h h

oe,

Bul

ldoz

ers,

Push

Cat

s, Sc

rape

r-up

to

21 y

ards

(st

ruck

Loa

d)-s

elf

prop

elle

d or

tra

ctor

dra

wn,

Tir

e-

man

, Fr

ont

End

Load

ers-u

p to

1+ y

ards

, A

spha

lt Pa

ver,

Asp

halt

Rol

ler-

10 t

on

or o

ver,

Well

Dri

llers

, M

echa

nics

, W

elder

s, Pu

mpc

rete

Mac

hine

S, C

oncr

ete

Pum

ps,

and

sim

ilar

type

pum

ps,

Engi

neer

or

Fire

man

on

Hig

h Pr

essu

re B

oile

r (o

n jo

b),

Self-

Load

ing

Batc

h Pl

ant,

Well

Poi

nt,

Ele

ctri

c Pu

mps

used

in

'Well

Poi

nt S

yste

m,

Pum

ps-1

2 in

ches

and

ove

r (t

otai

dis

char

ge),

Com

pres

sor

ione

or t

wo)

900

cu.

ft.

and

over

, Po

were

d G

reas

e Tr

uck,

Aut

omat

ic E

leva

tors

, m

anua

lly o

r re

mot

e co

ntro

ls),

Grou

t Pu

mps

, Bo

om T

ruck

, H

ydra

ulic

Cran

es-

unde

r 10

ton

.CL

ASS

IV

Asp

halt

Rol

ler-

unde

r 10

ton

CLAS

S V

Sing

le D

rum

Hoi

st,

Self-

Prop

elle

d R

olle

r, S

elf-

Prop

elle

d Co

mpa

ctor

s, Po

wer

Pave

men

t Br

eake

rs,

Conc

rete

Pav

emen

t Fi

nish

ing

Mac

hine

s, Tw

o Ba

g M

ixer

s w

ith S

kip,

McC

arth

y an

d si

mila

r d

rill

s, B

atch

Pla

nts

(not

sel

f-lo

adin

g) B

ulk

Ceme

nt P

lant

s, S

elf-

Prop

elle

d M

ater

ial

Spre

ader

s, A

Fram

e Tr

ucks

, Fo

rk L

ifts

ip t

o 15

fee

t.CL

ASS

VI

Com

pres

sors

(on

e or

two

) 31

5 cu

. ft

. to

900

cu.

ft.

, Pu

mps-U

inc

hes

to

12 i

nche

s (t

otal

dis

char

ge),

Trac

tor

(with

out

blad

e or

buc

ket)

Draw

ing

Rol

lers

, Ru

bber

, Ti

re R

olle

r, C

ompa

ctors

or

othe

r m

achi

nes

used

for

pul

veri

zing

, Gr

adin

g or

See

ding

. 'CL

ASS

VII

Com

pres

sors

(up

to

315

cu.

ft.)

, Sm

all M

ixer

s, Pu

mps

(up

to 1

+ in

ches

), Po

wer

Hea

ters

, W

eldin

g M

achi

nes,

Conv

eyor

s, OL

b r,v

Hel

pers

on

Gre

ase

Truc

k, a

nd

Gre

ase

Truc

ks w

ith h

and

grea

sing

equ

ipm

ent

PAID

HOL

IDAY

S:A-

New

Yea

r's

Day;

B-M

emor

ial

Lay;

C-In

depe

nden

ce D

ay;

D-La

bor

Day;

E-T

hank

sgiv

ing

Day;

F-C

hrist

mas

Day

FOOT

NOTE

S:*

' '

.a.

H

olid

ays:

A

thro

ugh

F, V

eter

ans'

Day

and

Colu

mbu

s Da

y.

FED

ERAL

REG

ISTE

R, V

OL.

40,

NO

. 20

7----

FRID

AY,

OCT

OBE

R 24

, 19

75

49952 N OTICES

Bas

icF

ring

e B

enof

ts P

aym

ents

'MAS

S-1

- 2-

3HE

AVY

& HI

GHWA

Y CO

NSTR

UCTI

ONh

ou

rly

Rot

asD

o si

c H

ourl

yF

ring

e B

enci

i1

POWE

R EQ

UIPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S:N

& W

Pen

sion

sV

ocat

ion

A|»p

. J

r.HE

AVY

& HI

GHWA

Y CO

NSTR

UCTI

ONts

Poy

men

ts

CLAS

S I

$ 9.

35.6

0'.7

5a

.05

LABO

RERS

:R

oles

H f

. VI

Pen

t len

sV

ocat

ion

App.

Tr.

CLAS

S II

9.15

.60

.75

-a

.05

CLAS

S II

I8.

95.6

0.7

5a

.05

Cla

ss I

.

■$7

.50

.50

.45

.10

CLAS

S IV

6.58

.60

.75

a.0

5C

lass

II

*7.

75.-5

0,.4

5.1

0CL

ASS

V7.

90.6

0.7

5a

.05

Cla

ss.I

ll ;

-8.

00.5

0.4

5.1

0CL

ASS

VI7.

45.6

0.7

5a

.05

Cla

ss I

V8.

25,

.50

.45

.10

,CL

ASS

VII

6.72

.60

.75

a.0

5

CLAS

SIFI

CATI

ONS

CLAS

S I

Shov

els,

Craw

ler a

nd T

ruck

Cra

nes,

Der

rick

s, Ba

ckho

es,

Tren

chin

g M

achi

nes,

Elev

atin

g G

rade

rs,

Bel

t-ty

pe L

oade

rs,

Gra

dalls

, Pi

le D

rive

rs,

Conc

rete

Pav

ers,

on s

ite

Proc

essin

g Pl

ant

(Eng

inee

r in

cha

rge)

, D

ragl

ine,

Clam

She

ll, C

ablew

ays,

Shaf

t H

oist

s, M

ucki

ng M

achi

nes,

Fron

t En

d Lo

ader

- ya

rds

and

over

, To

wer

Cran

es,

Self-

prop

elle

d H

ydra

ulic

Cra

nes-1

0 to

ns

and

over

, Du

al Pa

vers

, Au

tom

atic

Gra

ders

-Exc

avat

or (

C.M

.I. o

r eq

ual),

Acra

pers

tow

ing

pan

or w

agon

, Ta

ndem

Doz

ers

or P

ush

Cats

(2 u

nits

in

tand

em),

Weld

er u

sing

sem

i au

tom

atic

Weld

ing

Mac

hine

, Sh

otcr

ete

Mac

hine

, .

Tunn

el Bo

ring

Mac

hine

CLAS

S II

Ro

tary

Dri

ll (w

ith m

ount

ed C

ompr

esso

r),

Com

pres

sor

Hous

e 3

to

6

Com

pres

sors

), Ro

ck a

nd E

arth

Bor

ing

Mac

hine

s (e

xclu

ding

McC

arth

y an

d sim

ila

r d

rill

s),

Gra

der,

Fron

t En

d Lo

ader

s-ij.

yard

s to

5i

yard

s, Sc

rape

r-21

ya

rds

and

over

(St

ruck

Loa

d),

Fork

lifts

-7 f

t. l

ift

and

over

or

3 "to

n ca

paci

ty a

nd o

ver,

, So

nic

Hamm

er C

onso

le.

CLAS

S II

I B

ulld

ozer

, Pu

sh C

ats,

Scra

pers

-up

to 2

1 ya

rds

(str

uck

load

) se

lf-

prop

elle

d or

Tra

ctor

Dra

wn,

Self-

pow

ered

Asp

halt

Pave

r, Fr

ont

End

Load

ers-

up t

o ya

rds,

Mec

hani

cs,

Wel

ders

, W

ell D

rille

r, P

umpc

rete

Mac

hine

, En

gine

er

or F

irem

an o

n Hi

gh P

ress

ure

Boi

ler

(on

job)

, Se

lf-lo

adin

g Ba

tch

Plan

t (o

n jo

b),

Well

Poi

nt O

pera

tors

, E

lect

ric

Pump

s us

ed i

n W

ell P

oint

sys

tem

, Ti

rem

en,

Pum

ps-1

6 in

ches

or

over

tot

al d

ischa

rge,

Com

pres

sors

(1

or 2

) 90

0 cu

. ft

. an

d ov

er,

Powe

red

Gre

ase

Truc

k, A

spha

lt R

olle

r-10

ton

and

ove

r, T

unne

l Lo

com

otiv

es

and

Din

kys,

Grou

t Pu

mps

, H

ydra

ulic

Jack

s (j

acki

ng p

ipe,

slip

for

ms,

etc.

),Bo

om T

ruck

Sel

f-Pr

opel

led

Hyd

raul

ic Cr

anes

-up

to 1

0 to

nCL

ASS

IV

Asp

halt

Rol

ler-

up t

o 10

ton

CLAS

S V

Hoi

sts,

Con

veyo

rs,

Self-

pow

ered

Rol

lers

and

Com

pact

ors,

Powe

r Pa

vem

ent

■ Br

eake

r, Se

lf-pr

opel

led

Mat

eria

l Sp

read

er,

Self-

pow

ered

Con

cret

e Fi

nish

ing

Mac

hine

, Tw

o Ba

g M

ixer

with

ski

p, M

cCar

thy

and

sim

ilar

Dri

lls,

Batc

h-Pl

ant

(not

sel

f-lo

adin

g),

Bulk

Cem

ent

Plan

t.CL

ASS

VI

Com

pres

sor

(315

cu.

ft.

to

900

cu.

ft.,

1 o

r 2)

, Pu

mps

to 1

6"

tota

l di

scha

rge,

Tra

ctor

with

out

blad

e dr

awin

g sh

eeps

-foo

t to

ller,

Rub

ber

tired

rol

ler

or o

ther

typ

e of

com

pact

ors

incl

udin

g m

achi

nes

for

pulv

eriz

ing

and

aera

ting

soil

CLAS

S VI

I Co

mpr

esso

r (u

p to

315

cu.

ft.

), S

mal

l Mix

ers

with

ski

p, O

iler,

Pum

ps

up t

o 1*

", G

reas

e Tr

uck,

Hel

per

on p

ower

ed G

reas

e Tr

uck,

Pow

er H

eate

rs,.

Weld

ing

Mac

hine

s, A-

Fram

e Tr

ucks

, Fo

rklif

ts-u

p to

7 f

t. l

ift

and

up t

o 3

ton

capa

city

, Hy

dro

Broo

m,

Part

s M

an (

in

repa

ir s

hop)

, Po

wer

Safe

ty B

oat.

CLAS

SIFI

CATI

ONS

CLAS

S I

Carp

ente

r te

nder

s, ce

men

t fin

ishe

r te

nder

s, la

bore

rs,

wrec

king

lab

orer

s

CLAS

S II

Asp

halt

rake

rs,

fenc

e an

d gu

ard

rail

erec

tors

, la

ser

beam

op.

, ma

son

tend

er,

pipe

laye

r,

pneu

mat

ic dr

ill o

p,,

pneu

mat

ic to

ol o

p.,

wago

n dr

ill o

p

CLAS

S II

I A

ir t

rack

op.

CLAS

S IV

Bla

ster

s, po

wder

men

bloc

k pa

vers

, ra

mm

ers,

curb

set

ters

FOOT

NOTE

S:a.

Pa

id H

olid

ays:

Now

Yea

r's

Day;

Was

hing

ton'

s Bi

rthd

ay;

Mem

orial

Day

;In

depe

nden

ce D

ay;

Labo

r Da

y; C

olumb

us D

ay;

Vot

eran

s' Da

y; T

hank

sgiv

ing

Day

and

Cliri

stmas

Day

.

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49953

L

D2CI

310N

KO.

MA7

5-211

8 TR

UCK

niUVI

'RS:

HUÍL

DÍNR

AND

ruge

7MA

SS -

1 -

TD

- 1-

2-3

DHE

AVY

AND

HIGH

WAY

CONS

TRUC

TION

pane

l tr

ucks

and

pic

k-St

atio

n wa

gons

• u

p tr

ucks

Two

axle

equ

ipm

ent;

help

ers

on l

ow b

ed

when

ass

igne

d at

the

dis

cret

ion

of t

he

empl

oyer

, wa

reho

usem

en,

fork

lift

oper

s Th

ree

axle

equ

ipm

ent

and-

tirem

en

Four

and

fiv

e ax

le e

quip

men

t Sp

ecia

lized

ear

th m

ovin

g eq

uipm

ent

unde

r 35

ton

s ot

her

than

con

vent

iona

l ty

pe t

ruck

s, low

bed

, va

chau

l, m

echa

nics

, pa

ving

res

tora

tion

equi

pm

ent,

Mec

hani

csSp

ecia

lized

ear

th m

ovin

g eq

uipm

ent

, ov

er 3

5 to

nsT

raile

rs f

or e

arth

mov

ing

equi

pmen

t, (d

oubl

e ho

okup

)

PAID

HOL

IDAY

S;A-

New

Yea

r's

Day;

B-M

emor

ial D

ay;

C»In

depe

nden

ce D

ay;

D-La

bor

Day;

E-Th

anks

givi

ng D

ay;

F-Ch

ristm

as D

ay,

Foot

note

s :,

One

half

day’

s pa

y ea

ch m

onth

in

which

an

empl

oyee

has

wor

ked

15

days

pro

vide

d he

has

bee

n em

ploy

ed

for

4 m

onth

s.,

Hol

iday

s:

A th

roug

h F,

Was

hing

ton'

s Bi

rthd

ay,

Colum

bus

Day*

V

eter

an's

Day,

and

Patr

iots

' Da

y, pr

ovi

ded

an e

mpl

oyee

wor

ks t

wo d

ays

of t

he c

alen

dar

week

in

which

the

ho

liday

fal

ls.

Batic

Ho

urly

' Ra

tos

$7.2

4.

7.39

7.44

7.54

7.64

7.85

8.14

Frin

ga B

onaf

ttt P

aym

onti

,545

,545

,545

,545

.545

.545

.545

.575

.575

.575

.575 .575

.575

.575

a+b

a+b

a+b

a+b

a+b

a+b

a+b

FE

DE

RA

L

RE

GIS

TE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

I

49954 NOTICES

STAT

E:

Mich

igan

CO

UNTY

: M

uske

gon

DECI

SION

NO.

: M

I75“

2120

DA

TE:

Date

of

Publ

icat

ion

Supe

rsed

es D

ecisi

on N

umbe

r AM

-1+03

date

d Au

gust

18,

1971

in

36 F

R 15

896

DESC

RIPT

ION

OF W

ORK:

Res

iden

tial

Con

stru

ctio

n co

nsis

ting

of s

ingl

e fa

mily

- ho

mes

and

gard

en t

ype

apar

tmen

ts up

to

and

incl

udin

g fo

ur s

tori

es.

BRIC

KLAY

ERS

CARP

ENTE

RS

CEME

NT M

ASON

S DR

YWAL

L HA

NGER

S DR

YWAL

L TA

PERS

EL

ECTR

ICIA

NS

INSU

LATO

RS

LABO

RERS

PA

INTE

RSPO

WER

EQUI

PMEN

T OP

ERAT

ORS:

Cran

e O

pera

tor

Doze

r O

pera

tor

Grad

er O

pera

tor

Load

er O

pera

tor

Rol

ler

Ope

rato

r PL

UMBE

RS

ROOF

ERS

SHEE

T ME

TAL

WORK

ERS

SOFT

FLO

OR L

AYER

S TI

LE S

ETTE

RS

TRUC

K DR

IVER

S

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49955

SUPE

RSED

EAS

DECI

SION

Page

2

STAT

E:

Texa

s CO

UNTY

: Be

xar

DECI

SION

NO.:

TX75

-416

3 DA

TE:

Date

of

Publ

icat

ion

Supe

rsed

es D

ecisi

on N

o. AR

-45,

date

d Se

pten

ber

20,

1974

, in

39

FR 3

4015

. DE

SCRI

PTIO

N OF

WOR

K: Bu

ildin

g C

onst

ruct

ion,

(e

xclu

ding

sin

gle

fam

ily h

omes

and

gard

en t

ype

apar

tmen

ts up

to

and

incl

udin

g 4

stor

ies)

. (S

ee c

urre

nt

heav

y &

high

way

gene

ral

wage

det

erm

inat

ion

for

Pavi

ng A

Uti

litie

s In

cide

ntal

to

Build

ing

Con

stru

ctio

n).

,—

-J.

Botte

Fringe

Ben

efit.

Paym

ent*

Hourl

yRo

tesM &

WPen

sions

Vocat

ionApp

- Tt

ASBE

STOS

WOR

KERS

$8.4

3.3

5.4

5.0

8BO

ILERM

AKER

S8.

00.5

0.7

6.0

2BR

ICKL

AYER

S-STO

NEMA

SONS

7.87

.35

.30

.25

.05

CARP

ENTE

RS :

Carp

ente

rs7.

12.3

8.3

0•4

0.02

Mill

wri

ghts

7.42

.38

.30

.40

o02

CEME

NT M

ASON

S6.

68EL

ECTR

ICIA

NS:

Ele

ctri

cian

s8.

33.2

5517

.1/2

7.Ca

ble

splic

ers

8.58

.255

1%1

/2%

i ELE

VATO

R CO

NSTR

UCTO

RS7.

99.4

45.2

937

.+a+b

.02

! ELE

VATO

R CO

NSTR

UCTO

RS'

HELP

ERS

70XJ

R.4

45.2

93%

+a-H

).0

21 E

LEVA

TOR

CONS

TRUC

TORS

' HE

LPER

S(P

ROS.)

507.J

RGL

AZIE

RS5.

60•2

0IRO

NWOR

KERS

7.15

.55.6

0.2

0.0

7LA

BORE

RS:

Comm

on l

abor

ers

4.07

.25

.20

.02

Pipe

laye

rs,

conc

rete

& c

lay

(non

-m

etal

lic)

4.74

.28

.20

.02

Air

too

l op

erat

ors

(jack

ham

mer

,vi

brat

or)

4.83

.28

.20

•02

Bel

l ho

le m

an;

Mas

on t

ende

rs4.

85.2

8.2

0.0

2M

orta

r m

ixer

s; Pl

aste

rers

' te

nder

i 5.

11.2

8.2

0.0

2LA

THER

S8.

36.0

1LI

NE C

ONST

RUCT

ION:

Line

men

8.25

5.2

817.

1/27

.Ca

ble

splic

er9.

90.2

81%

1/2%

Grou

ndma

n (1

st y

ear)

4.12

.28

17.

1/2%

Grou

ndma

n5.

58.2

81%

1/2%

MARB

LE M

ASON

S6.

99.3

5.3

0.2

5MA

RBLE

MAS

ONS'

HELP

ERS

4.87

PAIN

TERS

:Br

ush-

6.55

.20

.05

Spra

y6.

80!

.20

.05

Stru

ctur

al s

teel

6.80

.20

•05

Spra

y on

str

uctu

ral

stee

l; s

and-

blas

ting

7.05

.20

.05

Pape

rhan

ger

6.55

.20

.05

Tape

r an

d flo

ater

6.55

.20

•05

PLAS

TERE

RS8.

35.0

1

I

DECI

SION

NO

TX75

-4Ì6

3

PLUM

BERS

»PIP

EFIT

TERS

RO

OFER

S:Ro

ofer

s K

ettle

men

W

ater

proo

fer

Roof

ers'

help

ers

SHEE

T ME

TAL

WORK

ERS

SOFT

FLO

OR L

AYER

S SP

RINK

LER

FITT

ERS

TERR

AZZO

WOR

KERS

TE

RRAZ

ZO W

ORKE

RS'

HELP

ERS'

Terr

azzo

hel

pers

Fl

oor

mac

hine

ope

rato

rs

Base

mac

hine

ope

rato

rs

TIIE

SET

TERS

TI

LE S

ETTE

RS'

HELP

ERS

TRUC

K DR

IVER

SWE

IDER

S -

rece

ive

rate

pre

scri

bed

for

craf

t pe

rfor

min

g op

erat

ion

to

which

wel

ding

is

Inci

dent

al.

FOOT

NOTE

S:a

- 1s

t 6

mos

. ■

none

; 6

mos

. to

5

yrs.

- 2

7.; o

ver

5 yr

s. -

4%

of

basi

c ho

urly

rat

e b

» Pa

id H

olid

ays

A th

ru F

PAID

HOL

IDAY

S:A-

New

Year

s' Da

y; B

-Mem

orial

Day

; C-

Inde

pend

ence

Day

; D-

Labo

r Da

y;E-

Than

ksgi

ving

Day

; F-

Chrls

tmas

Da

y

i.

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49956 NOTICES

DECISION NO

. TX

75-4

163

Page

3'

POWE

R EQ

UIPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S: A

ir c

ompr

esso

rs

Cran

es

Fork

lif

ts

Fron

t en

d lo

ader

s Fo

unda

tion

drill

s M

otor

gra

ders

O

ilers

Tren

chin

g m

achi

nes

Truc

k cr

ane

driv

ers

/

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49957

SUPE

RSED

EAS

DECI

SION

STAT

E:

Texa

s CO

UNTI

ES:

Cam

eron

, H

idal

go,

Star

r&

Will

acy

DECI

SION

NO.

: TX

75-4

167

DATE

: Da

te o

f Pu

blic

atio

nSu

pers

edes

Dec

ision

No.

TO75

-409

1, da

ted

Hay

16,

1975

, in

40

FR 2

1681

. DE

SCRI

PTIO

N OF

WOR

K: Bu

ildin

g C

onst

ruct

ion,

(e

xclu

ding

sin

gle

fam

ily

home

s an

d ga

rden

typ

e ap

artm

ents

up t

o an

d in

clud

ing

4 st

orie

s).

(See

cu

rren

t he

avy

A hi

ghwa

y ge

nera

l wa

ge d

eter

min

atio

n fo

r Pa

ving

& U

tilit

ies

Inci

dent

al t

o Bu

ildin

g C

onst

ruct

ion)

.B

asi

cFr

ing'

e B

en

efi

ts P

aym

ents

Rat

esH

& W

Pensi

ons

Voc

atio

nApp

. T.

.

ASBE

STOS

WOR

KERS

$8,3

7.3

5.4

0BO

ILERM

AKER

S8.

00.5

0.7

6.0

2

BRIC

KLAY

ERS

6.0

0

CARP

ENTE

RS:

Carp

ente

rs5.

00.0

25Pi

ledriv

erm

en4.

67CE

MENT

MAS

ONS

3.50

ELEC

TRIC

IANS

:E

lect

rica

l co

ntra

cts

unde

r§3

00,0

00

16

.21

.35

1%1/2

7.j

Ele

ctri

cal

cont

ract

s $3

00,9

001

& ov

er7.

85.3

5IX

1/27

.! G

LAZI

ERS

2.75

i LAB

ORER

S:|

Comm

on l

abor

ers

2.1

0*

| M

ason

ten

ders

2.1

0

j Pi

pela

yers

(co

ncre

te &

cla

y)2

.10

1 LIN

E CO

NSTR

UCTI

ON:

1 E

lect

rica

l co

ntra

cts

unde

r $3

00,0C

0:Li

nema

n6.

95.4

01%

1/2

%Gr

ound

man

3.93

.40

1%1

/2%

Grou

ndma

n (1

st y

ear)

3.48

.40

17.1/

27.

Ele

ctri

cal

cont

ract

s $3

00,0

00 &

ov e

r:Li

nema

n8.

40.4

017

.1

/2%

Grou

ndma

n4.

62.4

017

.1

/2%

'Gro

undm

an (

1st

year

)4.

20.4

017.

1/27.

PAIN

TERS

:Br

ush

2.60

¡PLAS

TERE

RS5

.00

PLUM

BERS

& P

IPEF

ITTE

RS7.

15.2

5.0

5RO

OFER

S:Ro

ofer

s3.

00K

ettle

men

2.1

0

SOFT

FLO

OR L

AYER

S2

.10

SPRI

NKLE

R FI

TTER

S1

0.1

0.5

0.7

0.0

8TE

RRAZ

ZO W

ORKE

RS2.

50TE

RRAZ

ZO W

ORKE

RS’

HELP

ERS

2.1

0

TILE

SET

TERS

2.50

TILE

SET

TERS

’ HE

LPER

S2

.10

TRUC

K DR

IVER

S2

.10

WELD

ERS

- re

ceiv

e ra

te p

resc

ribe

dfo

r cr

aft

perf

orm

ing

oper

atio

n to

which

weld

ihg

is I

ncid

enta

l

<.

FE

DE

RA

L

RE

GIS

TE

R,

VO

L.

AO

,N

O.

20

7-

-FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

2 A

, 1

97

5

49958 NOTICES

SUPE

RSE

DE

AS

DE

RIS

ION

STATE:

Texa

s COUNTIES:

Cameron, H

idalgo,

Star

r&

Will

acy

DECI

SION

NO.

: K

75-4

168

DATE

: Da

te o

f Pu

blic

atio

nSu

pers

edes

Dec

ision

No.

TX75

~409

3, da

ted

May

10,

1975

, In

40

Fit 2

1683

, DE

SCRI

PTIO

N OF

WOR

K: R

esid

entia

l co

nstr

uctio

n co

nsis

ting

of s

ingl

e fa

mily

' ho

mes

and

gard

en t

ype

apar

tmen

ts up

to

and

Incl

udin

g 4

stor

ies.

Basi

cFr

inge

Ben

efits

Pay

men

ts

Rate

sH

& WPe

nsio

nsVo

catio

nT>

.

BRIC

KLAY

ERS

$6.0

0CA

RPEN

TERS

:Ca

rpen

ters

5.00

.025

Plle

drlv

erm

en4.

67CE

MENT

MAS

ONS

3,50

ELEC

TRIC

IANS

:E

lect

rica

l co

ntra

cts

unde

r$3

00,0

006.

21.3

5IX

1/2X.

Ele

ctri

cal

cont

ract

s $3

00,0

00' &

ove

r7.

85.3

5IX

1/2X

¡GLA

ZIER

S2.

751 L

ABOR

ERS:

Comm

on l

abor

ers

2.10

Mas

on te

nder

s2.

10Pl

pela

yers

(co

ncre

te &

cla

y)2.

10PA

INTE

RS, B

RUSH

2.60

j PLA

STER

ERS

5.00

1 PLU

MBER

S &

PIPE

FITT

ERS

7.15

.25

.05

¡ROO

FERS

:!

Roof

ers

3.00

Ket

tlem

en2.

10SO

FT F

LOOR

LAY

ERS

2.10

TERR

AZZO

WOR

KERS

2.50

TERR

AZZO

WOR

KERS

’ HE

LPER

S2.

10TI

LE S

ETTE

RS2.

50TI

LE S

ETTE

RS’

HELP

ERS

2.10

TRUC

K DR

IVER

S2.

10

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—I

DECI

SION

NO,

to75

~416

8

INCI

DENT

AL P

AVIN

G &

UTIL

ITIE

S &

SITE

PRE

PARA

TION

Bosic

Hour

lyRo

tes

Frin

ge B

enef

its P

oym

ents

H &

WPe

nsio

n •Vo

catio

nAp

p. Tr

.

Air

Too

l Ma

n$2

.75

Asph

alt

Heat

erm

an3.

25A

spha

lt Ra

ker

3.25

Asph

alt

Shov

eler

2.50

Batc

hing

Pla

nt S

calem

an3.

40Ca

rpen

ter

3.50

Carp

ente

r H

elper

2.40

Conc

rete

Pin

lsher

(Pa

ving

)2.

75Co

ncre

te F

inish

er H

elper

(Pa

ving

)2.

35j C

oncr

ete

Fini

sher

(St

ruct

ures

)3.

35j

Conc

rete

Fin

isher

Hel

per(

Stru

ctur

e>)

2.65

> Ele

ctri

cian

s7.

50• F

orm

Build

er (

Stru

ctur

es)

4.00

Form

Bui

lder

Help

er (

Stru

ctur

es)

2.80

Form

Lin

er (

Pavi

ng a

nd C

urb)

3.00

* Form

Set

ter

(Pav

ing

and

Curb

)3.

00Fo

rm S

ette

r H

elper

(Pa

ving

& C

urb)

2.75

| Form

Set

ter

(Str

uctu

res)

3.75

i For

m Se

tter

Help

er (

Stru

ctur

es)

3.00

| Lab

orer

, Co

mmon

2.35

Labo

rer,

Uti

lity

Man

2.85

Man

hole

Build

er,

Brick

3.50

Mec

hani

c4.

00M

echa

nic

Help

er2.

85O

iler

2.80

Serv

icem

an2.

50Pl

ledrlv

erm

en3.

75[ P

lpel

ayer

2.85

Plpe

iaye

r H

elper

2.50

Rein

forc

ing

Stee

l Se

tter(

Stru

ctur

eii)

3.30

Rei

nfor

cing

Ste

el S

ette

r H

elper

2.40

Spre

ader

Box

Man

3.25

Powe

r Eq

uipm

ent

Ope

rato

rs:

Asp

halt

Dis

trib

utor

3.25

Asph

alt

Pavi

ng M

achi

ne3.

50• B

room

or

Swee

per

Ope

rato

r2.

50Bu

lldoz

er,

150

HP a

nd L

ess

3.25

Bulld

ozer

, ov

er 1

50 H

P3.

55

OCTO

BER

24,

1975

NOTICES 49959

Page

_3

nF.CI

SlON

NO.

INCI

DENT

AL P

AVIN

G A

UTIL

ITIE

S &

SITE

PRE

PARA

TION

Bosie

-ri ng

e Ben

efit

s Pay

men

ts

Rot

esH

& W

Pensio

nsVo

cation

Ap

p.

Tr.

1

'|

, .

i

Powe

r Eq

uipm

ent

Ope

rato

rs (

Cont

'd)

Cran

e, C

lam

shel

l, Ba

ckho

e, D

erri

cl D

ragl

ine,

Sho

vel

(les

s th

an l

s Cl

Cran

e, C

lam

shel

l, Ba

ckho

e, De

rricl

D

ragl

ine,

Sho

vel

(1% C

Y &

Over

) Fr

ont

End

Load

er (

2% C

Y an

d Le

ss)

Fron

t En

d Lo

ader

(Ov

er 2

% CY

) M

otor

Gra

der

Ope

rato

r, Fi

ne G

rade

M

otor

Gra

der

Ope

rato

r R

olle

r, S

teel

Whe

el (P

lant

-Mix

Pa

vem

ents)

Rol

ler,

Ste

el W

heel

(Oth

er-F

lat

Whe

el or

Tam

ping

)R

olle

r, P

neum

atic

(Sel

f-Pro

pelle

d]

Scra

pers

(17

CY

and

Less

)Sc

rape

rs (

Over

17

CY)

Trac

tor

(Cra

wler

Typ

e) 1

50 H

P an

d Le

s 8Tr

acto

r (C

rawl

er T

ype)

over

150

HI

Trac

tor

(Pne

umat

ic) 8

0 HP

and

Les

s Tr

acto

r (P

neum

atic)

ove

r 80

HP

Trav

eling

Mixe

r Tr

uck

Dri

vers

:Si

ngle

Axl

e, C

ight

>

Sing

le A

xle,

Hea

vy

Tand

em A

xle

or S

emitr

aile

r W

elder -,

■

•■vV

:

::1

)$3.

00

! A.

253.

003.

504.

003.

50 2.65 2.60

2.60

3.00

3.50

2.85

3.10

2.75

3.

00

3.00

2.35

2.50

2.35

3.75

4*« ZD ZD § z o n m ui

IFE

DER

AL

REG

ISTE

R, V

OL.

40

, N

O.

207—

FRID

AY

, O

CTO

BER

24,

1975

SUPE

RSE

DEA

S D

EC

ISIO

N

STAT

E;

Texas

COUNTIES:

Collin,

Dallas,

Denton,

Elli

s, G

rays

on,■H

ood,

Hun

t, Jo

hnso

n,

Kauf

man,

Palo

Pin

to,

Rock

wall,

Tarr

ant

& W

iseDE

CISI

ON N

O,;

TX75

-416

9 DA

TE;

Date

of P

ublic

atio

nSu

pers

edes

Dec

ision

No,

TX75

-410

2, da

ted

May

23,

197

5, i

n 40

FR

2279

1.

DESC

RIPT

ION

OF W

ORK:

Build

ing

Con

stru

ctio

n, (

excl

udin

g si

ngle

fam

ily h

omes

and

gard

en t

ype

apar

tmen

ts up

to

and

incl

udin

g 4

stor

ies)

and

als

o ex

clud

ing

Dal

las-

Fort

Wor

th R

egio

nal

Air

port

, (S

ee c

urre

nt h

eavy

& h

ighwa

y ge

nera

l wa

ge d

eter

min

atio

n fo

r Pa

ving

& Ut

ilit

ies

Inci

dent

al t

o Bu

ildin

g C

onst

ruct

ion)

,B

asic

Fri

nge

Ben

efit

s P

aym

ents

Hou

rly

Rat

esH S

i WPe

nsio

nsV

ocat

ion

A|»|». T

r.

ASBE

STOS

WOR

KERS

$8.7

8.3

0.5

1.0

25BO

ILERM

AKER

SBR

ICKL

AYER

S &

STON

EMAS

ONS :

8.00

.50

.76

.02

ZONE

1 -

Gra

yson

Cou

nty

ZONE

2 -

Col

lin.

Dal

las.

Dent

on.

6.80

Elli

s, H

ood,

Hunt

, Jo

hnso

n, K

auf

man,

Palo

Pin

to,

Rock

wall,

Tar

ra

nt &

Wise

Cou

nties

8.29

.30

r.50

.04

CARP

ENTE

RS;

ZONE

1 -

Gra

yson

Cou

nty:

Carp

ente

rs8.

2 25

.30

.30

.005

Mill

wri

ghts

8.62

5.3

0.3

0.0

05Pi

ledr

iver

men

ZONE

2 -

Col

lin.

Dal

las.

Den

ton,

8.72

5.3

0.3

0.0

05E

llis,

Hoo

d, Hu

nt,

John

son,

Kau

f ma

n, Pa

lo P

into

, Ro

ckwa

ll, T

ar

rant

& W

ise C

ount

ies:

Carp

ente

rs8.

21.3

0.3

0.0

2St

atio

nary

pow

er s

aw o

pera

tors

8.33

5.3

0.3

0.0

2M

illw

righ

ts8“.

84.3

0.0

2CE

MENT

MAS

ONS:

ZONE

1 -

Gra

yson

Cou

ntv

ZONE

2 -

Den

ton,

Hoo

d, Jo

hnso

n,6.

16

Palo

Pin

to,

Tarr

ant

& W

ise

Coun

ties

7.94

5.25

.45

ZONE

3 -

Col

lin.

Dal

las.

Elli

s.Hu

nt,

Kauf

man

& Ro

ckwa

ll Co

untie

! EL

ECTR

ICIA

NS:

7.88

5.4

0.3

5.0

|ZO

NE 1

- D

ento

n, H

ood,

John

son,

Palo

Pin

to,

Tarr

ant

& W

ise

Cou

nties

:E

lect

rici

ans

9.45

.40

17.7/1

07.

Cabl

e sp

licer

s ZO

NE 2

- G

rays

on C

ount

v:9.

70.4

017,

7/10

7.E

lect

rici

ans

9.17

47.

57.

7/107

.Ca

blfe

splic

ers

10.0

947

. '

57.

7/10

7.

Pa

ge

____

2_

DECISION NO.

1X75

-416

9B

asic

Fri

nge

Ben

efit

s P

aym

ents

Hou

rly

Rat

es

ELEC

TRIC

IANS

(CO

NT'D

):H

& W

Pens

ions

Voc

otlo

nA

pp.

Tf.

ZONE

3 -

Col

lin.

Dal

las.

Elli

s.Hu

nt,

Kauf

man

& Ro

ckwa

ll Co

untie

AREA

A -

All

work

per

form

ed i

nD

alla

s Co

unty

:E

lect

rici

ans

$9.1

147

.57

.7/1

0%Ca

ble

splic

ers

AREA

B -

All

work

per

form

ed o

ut10

.02

47.

57.

7/107

.sid

e of

Dal

las

Coun

ty u

p to

a

radi

us o

f 40

roa

d m

iles

from

the

City

Hal

l in

the

City

of

Dal

las:

| E

lect

rici

ans

9.36

47.

57.

7/107

,Ca

ble

splic

ers

AREA

C -

All

work

per

form

ed o

ut*

10.3

047

.57

.7/

107.

side

of

Area

A a

nd A

res

B:E

lect

rici

ans

9.61

47.

57.7/1

0%Ca

ble

splic

ers

10.5

747

.57

.7/1

0%EL

EVAT

OR C

ONST

RUCT

ORS

8.21

.445

.29

37.+a

-+b.0

2j E

LEVA

TOR

CONS

TRUC

TORS

' HE

LPER

S 1 E

LEVA

TOR

CONS

TRUC

TORS

' HE

LPER

S70

UR.4

45.2

937

.+a+b

.02

(PR0

B.)

f GL

AZIE

RS:

50%

JR

ZONE

1 -

Col

lin,

Dal

las,

Dent

on,

Elli

s, H

ood,

Hunt

, Jo

hnso

n, K

auf»

man,

Palo

Pin

to,

Rock

wall,

Tar

ra

nt &

Wise

Cou

nties

7.39

.25.2

5.0

25IRO

NWOR

KERS

LABO

RERS

:7.

125

.55.6

0.0

3!•

ZONE

1 -

Gra

yson

Cou

ntv:

1 GR

OUP

1 -

Uns

kille

d la

bore

rs

GROU

P 2

- A

ir to

ol o

pera

tor

5.62

.275

.30

(jack

haiii

mer

, vi

brat

or),

maso

n te

nder

s &

mor

tar

mix

ers,

pipe

- la

yers

5.87

.275

.30

ZONE

2 -

Col

lin,

Dal

las,

Dent

on,

Elli

s, H

ood,

Hunt

, Jo

hnso

n, K

auf'

man,

Palo

Pin

to,

Rock

wall,

Tar

ra

nt &

Wise

Cou

nties

:GR

OUP

15.

62.2

75.3

0.0

2GR

OUP

25.

77.2

75.3

0.0

2GR

OUP

35.

87.2

75.3

0.0

2GR

OUP

46.

02.2

75.3

0 .0

2«

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49961

3Pa

ge__

4Pa

ge.

DECI

SION

NO. T

X75-

4169

- LA

BORE

RS C

LASS

IFIC

ATIO

N DE

FINI

TION

S

CROU

P I

- A

ll ha

nd d

iggi

ng d

irt

work

and

bac

kfill

ing;

fir

ing

of s

alam

ande

rs,

load

ing

and

unlo

adin

g of

mat

eria

ls to

and

fro

m h

oist

or

cage

s; l

oadi

ng a

nd

unlo

adin

g of

too

ls a

nd e

quip

men

t; w

heel

ing,

pla

cing

and

pou

ring

of c

oncr

ete;

al

l ex

cava

tion;

han

dlin

g of

lum

ber,

stee

l, ce

men

t; di

stri

butio

n of

all

mat

eria

ls;

misc

ella

neou

s Jo

b cl

ean-

up;

wrec

king

and

ras

ing

of b

uild

ings

and

al

l st

ruct

ures

; cl

eani

ng a

nd c

lear

ing

of a

ll d

ebri

s; h

andl

ing

of b

roke

n co

ncr

ete

or o

ther

dam

aged

or

unda

mage

d m

ater

ials;

rem

ovin

g, m

ovin

g, ha

ndlin

g an

d j

grea

sing

'of

form

s, wr

ecki

ng f

orm

s; st

orin

g m

ater

ials

to s

tora

ge p

lace

; sl

ip

i , fo

rm j

acks

, sc

affo

ld b

uild

ers,

chec

king

mat

eria

ls an

d to

ols

in a

nd o

ut o

f re

ce

ivin

g lo

ts a

nd s

heds

; to

ol h

ouse

men

; la

ndsc

aper

; as

phal

t ir

oner

and

rat

er;

wat

erpr

oofin

g te

nder

; du

mper

; sp

otte

r;’ c

oncr

ete

pum

pcre

te p

ipe

(han

dlin

g an

d la

ying

); c

arpe

nter

ten

der

GROU

P 2

- A

ll po

wer

tool

and

equ

ipm

ent

oper

ator

s (g

as,

elec

tric

or

air)

; cu

ttin

g !

torc

hes

man;

con

cret

e gr

adem

an;

powe

r bu

ggy

oper

ator

; wa

gon

dril

l op

erat

or,

wel

l dr

iller

, dr

illin

g ri

g te

nder

; ce

men

t fin

ishe

r te

nder

; m

etal

pan

and

ste

el f

orm

me

n; h

andl

ing

creo

sote

d m

ater

ials

; liq

uid

acid

s or

lik

e m

ater

ials

when

in

juri

ous

to h

ealth

, ey

es,

skin

or

clot

hes;

all

new

ly de

velo

ped

equi

pmen

t wh

ich r

epla

ces

whee

lbar

rows

or

hugg

ies

prev

ious

ly u

sed

by l

abor

ers,

scal

e me

n on

bat

ch p

lant

sGR

OUP

3 -

Conc

rete

and

cla

y pi

pe (

hand

ling

& la

ying

); m

ason

han

dler

; sc

affo

ld

build

er;

maso

n te

nder

; ho

d ca

rrie

rs m

orta

r m

ixer

s; l

athe

r te

nder

s, pl

aste

r te

nder

s; w

ater

pum

p op

erat

ors

up t

o fo

ur i

nche

s; c

emen

t m

ason

ten

ders

; m

orta

r I

mix

ers;

hod

car

rier

s; d

ry m

ixer

s; t

ank

clea

ning

; al

l pi

pe d

opin

g, t

reat

ing

I an

d wr

appi

ng,

incl

udin

g al

l me

n wo

rkin

g w

ith d

ope,

mor

tar

and

plas

ter

mix

ing

mac

hine

s, gr

out

mac

hine

s; pu

mp C

rete

mac

hine

s, gu

nite

mix

ing

mac

hine

s,In

clud

ing

plac

ing

and

clea

ning

of

pipe

and

con

duits

use

d in

pla

cing

of

con

cret

e, h

andl

ing

and

plac

ing

of g

unite

mat

eria

ls fro

m s

tock

pile

s, s

cree

ning

sa

nd,

runn

ing

sand

dry

er a

nd l

oadi

ng a

nd o

pera

ting

sand

bla

ster

, ex

cept

noz

zle,

! co

nvey

ing,

sto

ckin

g an

d ha

ndlin

g of

all

mat

eria

ls fo

r br

ick

mas

ons,

lath

ers,

cem

ent

finis

hers

, pl

aste

rers

; di

tch

work

ove

r 6

feet

and

cle

anin

g ou

t dr

ill

pier

sGR

OUP

4 -

Sand

bla

ster

, bl

aste

r po

wdcr

man;

Gun

ite w

orke

r; g

unite

noz

zle

man

and

terr

azzo

gri

nder

LATH

ERS:

ZONE

1 -

Col

lin,

Dal

las,

Dent

on,

Elli

s, G

rays

on,

Hunt

, Ka

ufma

n A

Rock

wall

Coun

ties

ZONE

2 -

Hoo

d, Jo

hnso

n, P

alo

Pint

o, T

arra

nt &

Wise

Cou

nties

Bo

.ic

. Fr

ing

e B

en

efi

ts P

aym

ents

Role

sM

& W

Pensi

ons

Vec

alie

n*»»

• tf.

$9.2

3

9.23

.04

.04

DECI

SION

NO.

1X75

-416

9-

Bosi

cFr

inge

Ben

efit»

Pay

men

tsHo

urly

H &

WPe

n» io

nsVe

catle

n*P

P- T

*.Ro

te»

LINE

CON

STRU

CTIO

N:Li

nem

en;

Line

men

ope

rato

rs$9

.86

IX1/2

7.Ca

ble

splic

er10

.85

IX1/2

7.Gr

ound

man,

1st

6 m

onth

s5.

9217.

1/27.

Grou

ndma

n, 2n

d 6

mon

ths

6.41

17.

1/27.

Grou

ndma

n, 1

year

& o

ver

I MAR

BLE

SETT

ERS:

6.90

1%1/2

7.

ZONE

1 -

Col

lin.

Dal

las,

Elli

s.

Hun

t, Ka

ufma

n &

Rock

wall

Coun

tlei

ZONE

2 -

Den

ton.

Hoo

d, Jo

hnso

n.7.

90

Palo

Pin

to,

Tarr

ant

& W

ise

1 Co

untie

s8.

30| M

ARBL

E SE

TTER

S' HE

LPER

S :

i ZO

NE 1

- C

ollin

. D

alla

s. E

llis.

1 Hu

nt,

Kauf

man

& Ro

ckwa

ll Co

untie

s PA

INTE

RS:

6.90

! ZO

NE 1

- C

ollin

. D

alla

s. E

llis.

j Gr

ayso

n, H

unt,

Kauf

man

& Ro

ck

wal

l Co

untie

s:GR

OUP

1 -

Brus

hGR

OUP

2 -

All

wal

l co

veri

ng w

ork

7.42

5.3

5.3

0.0

4

pape

r, fa

bric

, sh

eetin

g, f

lex-

wo

od,

etc.

7.67

5.3

5.3

0.0

4GR

OUP

3 -

Ames

tool

s op

erat

or

GROU

P 4

- St

ruct

ural

ste

el.

7.55

.35

.30

.04

stag

e wo

rk,

bosu

n ch

air,

spr

ay

gun,

san

dbla

stin

g an

d wi

ndow

Ja

cks,

fire

esca

pes

7.80

.35

.30

.04

ZONE

2 -

Den

ton

Coun

ty:

GROU

P 1

- Br

ush,

han

d ro

ller

8.40

GROU

P 2

- A

ll w

all

cove

ring

wor

k GR

OUP

3 -

Stru

ctur

al s

teel

; st

age

8.70

& bo

sun

chai

r wo

rk,

wind

ow J

acks

sp

rayi

ng,

sand

blas

ting

& po

wer

tool

wor

k

9 8.65

ZONE

3 -

Hoo

d, Jo

hnso

n, P

alo

. Pin

to,

Tarr

ant

& W

ise C

ount

ies:

.GR

OUP

18.

295

.20

.02

GROU

P 2

8.54

5.2

0.0

2GR

OUP

38.

295

.20

.02

GROU

P 4

9*54

5.2

0.0

2

49962 NOTICES

5

DECI

SION

NO.

TX75

-416

9 C LA S

S IF I

CAT l

Obl D

EFIN

ITIO

NS

GROU

P 1

- Br

ush

GROU

P 2

- Sp

ray;

Wal

lcov

erin

g; P

ress

ure

rolle

r; S

andb

last

ing;

Str

uctu

ral

stee

l;

Bosu

n ch

air.

Wind

ow j

ack

Sc wi

ndow

sil

l; S

tage

; Fi

re e

scap

e; S

teel

sto

rage

ta

nks;

Sti

lts;

Mitt

ens;

Ame

s to

ol's;

Dry

wall

finis

hing

GR

OUP

3 -

On j

obs

requ

irin

g le

ss t

han

six

250

feet

rol

ls o

f jo

int

tape

, or

les

s th

an e

ight

man

hou

rs o

f be

ddin

g tim

e th

e dr

ywal

l fin

ishi

ng r

ate

will

be

GROU

P 4

- St

eepl

e Ja

ck r

ate

(rad

io a

nd T

V to

wer

s, sm

oke

stac

ks,

chim

neys

and

w

ater

tow

ers,

and

sim

ilar

faci

liti

es a

nd f

lag

pole

s at

op b

uild

ings

lo

cate

d cl

oser

to

the

edge

of

the

build

ing

than

the

hei

ght

of t

hè p

ole)

; To

xic

mat

eria

l ra

te (

creo

sote

, co

al t

ar p

rodu

cts

or s

imila

r m

ater

ials

inju

riou

s to

th

e sk

in)

PLAS

TERE

RS:

ZONE

1 -

Gra

yson

Cou

nty

ZONE

2 -

Col

lin,

Dal

las,

Elli

s,

Hunt

, Ka

ufma

n &

Rock

wall

Coun

tie

ZONE

3 -

Den

ton,

Hoo

d, Jo

hnso

n,

,Pal

o Pi

nto,

Tar

rant

& W

ise

'.Cou

nties

PLUM

BERS

& S

TRAM

P IT T

ERS

ROOF

ERS:

ZONE

1 -

Col

lin,

Dal

las,

Elli

s,

Gra

yson

, H

unt,

Kauf

man

& Ro

ck

wal

l C

ount

ies:

GROU

P 1

- Sl

ate

& ti

le

GROU

P 2

- Co

mpo

sitio

n an

d bu

ilt

up r

oofin

g, d

amp

proo

fing

& bi

tum

inou

s w

ater

proo

fing

ZONE

2 -

Den

ton,

Hoo

d, Jo

hnso

n,

Palo

Pin

to,

Tarr

ant

& W

ise

| C

ount

ies:

j .

GROU

P 1

- Sl

ate,

til

e as

best

os

| ro

ofin

g & s

idin

gGR

OUP'

2 -

Com

posit

ion,

bui

lt-up

da

mp &

wat

er p

roof

ing,

ket

tle-

me

nSH

EET

META

L WO

RKER

S:ZO

NE 1

- C

ollin

, D

alla

s, E

llis,

G

rays

on,

Hunt

, Ka

ufma

n &

Rock

w

all

Coun

ties

ZONE

2 -

Den

ton,

Hoo

d, Jo

hnso

n,

Palo

Pin

to,

Tarr

ant

& W

ise C

os,

Ba

sic

Frin

ge B

e ne

fit t

Pay

men

t»

Rot

esH

& W

Pensi

ons

Voc

oft

enXpp

. Tr

.

$6.0

5

i 7.

885

.35.5

0.0

3

9.26

.01

8.00

.38.9

0.0

8

8.06

5

7.91

5

8.01

5.0

5

7.86

5.0

5

7.83

5.3

5.5

0.0

3

8.10

5.4

5.3

0.0

55

DECI

SION

NO.

TX75

-416

9

SOFT

FLO

OR L

AYER

S SP

RINK

LER

FITT

ERS

TERR

AZZO

WOR

KERS

:ZO

NE 1

- C

ollin

, D

alla

s, E

llis,

Hu

nt,

Kauf

man

& Ro

ckwa

ll Co

untie

s ZO

NE 2

- D

ento

n, H

ood,

John

son,

Pa

lo P

into

, Ta

rran

t &

Wise

Cos

TI

I£ S

ETTE

RS:

ZONE

1 -

Col

lin,

Dal

las,

Hun

t,I

Kauf

man

A Ro

ckwa

ll Co

untie

s |

ZONE

2 -

Den

ton,

Hoo

d, Jo

hnso

n,1

Palo

Pin

to,

Tarr

ant

& W

ise C

os

| TIL

E SE

TTER

S' HE

LPER

S: j

ZONE

1 -

Col

lin,

Dal

las,

Hun

t, Ka

ufma

n &

Rock

wall

Coun

ties

¡TRUC

K DR

IVER

S:I

ZONE

1 -

Col

lin,

Dal

las,

Elli

s,I

Hun

t, Ka

ufma

n &

Rock

wall

Coun

ties

! ZO

NE 2

- D

ento

n, H

ood,

John

son,

! Pa

lo P

into

, Ta

rran

t &

Wise

Cos

, WE

LDER

S -

rece

ive

rate

pre

scri

bed

for

craf

t pe

rfor

min

g op

erat

ion

to

which

weld

ing

is i

ncid

enta

l.

FOOT

NOTE

S:¡a

- 1

st 6

mos

. -

none

; 6

mos

. to

5

yrs.

- Z

7,‘,

over

5 y

rs.

- 4%

of

Frin

ge B

en

efi

ts P

aym

ents

Hou

rly

Rote

s

!bba

sic h

ourl

y ra

te.

Paid

Hol

iday

s A

thru

F

¡PAI

D HO

LIDA

YS:

JA-N

ew Y

ears

' Da

y; B

-Mem

orlal

Day

; iC

-Inde

pend

ence

Day

; D-

Labo

r Da

y;

E-Th

anks

givi

ng D

ay;

F-Ch

ristm

as

Day

$7.9

310

.10

7.95

8.30

8.60

8.30

6.90

4.25

4.00

.25

.50

.20

.80

.03

.08

.30

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7— FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49963

Page

___8

Page

?

DECI

SION

NO.

TX75

-416

9-

Bo

sic

Hourl

y

Rot

es

Frin

ge B

en

efi

ts P

oym

ents

H &

WPe

nsi

ons

Voc

ofio

nApp

. T»

.

POWE

R EQ

UIPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S:ZO

NE 1

- D

alla

s Co

unty

:GR

OUP

1$6

,465

.30

.40

GROU

P 2

7.25%

.30

.40

GROU

P 3

r .....

......

.7.6

5%.3

0.4

0

POWE

R EQ

UIPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S (ZO

NE .1

) CI

AS SI

F IC A

TI ON

DEF

INIT

IONS

CROU

P l

* O

ilers

GROU

P 2

- A

ir c

ompr

esso

rs;

Blad

e G

rade

r, to

wed;

Fle

x pl

ane;

For

m gr

ader

; Co

ncr

ete

mix

er,

less

tha

n 14

cu.

ft.

; W

ater

.pun

ps -

2V

or

over

and

- 2 o

r mo

re

pump

s; Pu

lsom

eter

; W

eldin

g m

achi

nes,

gaso

line

or d

iese

l dr

iven

(2

to 6

mac

hine

s);.

Wag

on d

rill

oper

ator

; Co

nvey

or;

Hoi

st,

sing

le d

rum;

Scr

aper

, 3

cu.

yd.

or l

ess;

G

ener

ator

, ga

solin

e or

die

sel

driv

en (

over

150

0 w

atts

); B

ob c

at w

ith l

oade

r;A

ll ot

her

equi

pmen

t' of

sim

ilar

natu

re c

omin

g su

nder

the

lig

ht e

quip

men

t cl

ass,

wh

en p

ower

ope

rate

dGR

OUP

3 -

Heav

y du

ty m

echa

nic;

Asp

halt

mix

er o

pera

tor

on J

ob;

Blad

e gr

ader

, se

lf-pr

opel

led;

Bul

l cla

m;

Bac

kfill

er;

Bulld

ozer

A a

ll ca

t ty

pe t

ract

ors;

Back

hoe;

Conc

rete

mix

ers,

over

14

cu.'

ft.;

Cru

sher

ope

rato

r on

Job

; Co

ncre

te

batc

h pl

ant

oper

ator

; Cl

am s

hell;

Cra

nes

(all

type

s);

Truc

k m

ount

ed o

n cr

awle

r re

quir

es o

iler

incl

udin

g gr

oves

(hy

drau

lic)

or s

imila

r ty

pe o

ver

12% t

on c

apac

ity

Esca

late

d ra

te o

n cr

ane

and

derr

icks

boo

ms;

.01c

per

hou

r, pe

r fo

ot o

ver

90*

incl

udin

g Ji

b; d

ragl

ines

; de

rric

ks,

pov»

er op

erat

ed (

all

type

s);

1X7-1

0 ca

ter

pilla

r, 3

-8 E

uclid

and

sim

ilar

trac

tors

; El

evat

ing

grad

er,

self-

prop

elle

d;

Foun

datio

n dr

illin

gim

achi

ne (

all)

; Fo

rklif

ts,

used

in

hand

ling

mac

hine

ry o

n co

nstr

uctio

n; R

rade

all;

Hol

st,

mot

or d

rive

n, 2

dru

ms o

r m

ore;

Loco

mot

ive

cran

e;

Mlx

mob

lle;

Pavi

ng m

ixer

s (a

ll ty

pes)

; Pi

le d

rive

rs;

Pum

pcre

te m

achi

nes;

Pneu

mat

ic ro

llers

, se

lf-pr

opel

led;

Sho

vels

, po

wer

oper

ated

; Sc

rape

rs,

over

3

cu.

yds.;

Sco

opm

obile

; Tr

ench

ing

mac

hine

s, al

l ty

pes;

Winc

h tr

ucks

, wh

en p

ole

and

winc

h is

use

d; W

ater

wel

l dr

illin

g m

achi

nes,

used

on

cons

truc

tion;

Well

•

poin

t pu

mps;

Weld

ing

mac

hine

s (7

to.

13 m

achi

nes)

; A

ll ot

her

equi

pmen

t of

sim

ilar

natu

re'co

min

g un

der

heav

y eq

uipm

ent

clas

s, w

hen

powe

r op

erat

edr-

------

------

------

------

------

------

------

----

Bo

sic

Frin

ge B

en

efi

ts P

oym

ents

Hou

rly

Rote

sH

& W

.Pe

nsi

ons

Voc

ofio

n '

App

. Ti

:

POWE

R EQ

UIPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S (C

ONT'

D)ZO

NE 2

- C

ollin

, De

nton

, E

llis,

Gray

son,

Hoo

d, Hu

nt,

John

son,

Kauf

man,

Palo

Pin

to,

Rock

wall,

Tarr

ant

& W

ise C

ount

ies:

GROU

P 1

$,6

,66

5.3

0.5

0.1

0

GROU

P 2

7.4

5.3

0.5

0.1

0

GROU

P 3

7.8

5.3

0.5

0.1

0

DECI

SION

NO.

TX75

-416

9

POWE

R EQ

UIPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S (ZO

NE 2

) CI

ASSI

FICA

TION

DEF

INIT

IONS

GROU

P 1

- O

iler-

Fire

man

GROU

P 2

- A

ir C

ompr

esso

rs,

Pump

s, W

eldin

g M

achi

nes,

Thr

ottle

Val

ves,

Ligh

t Pl

ants

; Co

nvey

or;

Wag

on D

rill;

Ele

vato

rs B

uild

ing;

For

m G

rade

rs;

Hoi

st,

Sing

le D

rum;

For

d Tr

acto

r in

clud

ing

blad

e an

d mo

wer

on r

ear;

Mix

ers

less

th

an 1

4 cu

bic

feet

; Sc

reen

ing

Plan

ts;

Crus

hing

Pla

nts;

For

k L

ifts

(sho

rt,

unde

r 25

fee

t);

Conc

rete

Pum

ps (

ail

type

s);

Bobc

at t

ype

equi

pmen

t; A

ll ot

her

equi

pmen

t of

sim

ilar

natu

re c

omin

g un

der

the

Ligh

t Eq

uipm

ent

Cla

ssi

fica

tion

,1 wh

en p

ower

ope

rate

dGR

OUP

3 -

Ford

Tra

ctor

or

like

with

any

atta

chm

ents

(exc

ept

blad

e an

d mo

wer

on

rear

){D

rilli

ng M

achi

nes

(all

type

s);

Scoo

pmob

iles;

Hoi

sts,

two

dru

ms o

r m

ore;

Fork

lifts

(ov

er 2

5 ft

.);

Winc

h Tr

uck;

Six

Whe

el Tr

uck,

whe

n us

ed c

ontin

uous

ly

for

5 da

ys;

Mix

erm

obile

; Lo

com

otiv

es;

Mix

ers,

14 c

ubic

ft.

or

over

; Bl

ade

Gra

ders

, se

lf-pr

opel

led;

Cab

leway

s; Cr

anes

-pow

er o

pera

ted

to 1

00 f

t.;

Der

rick

s, po

wer

oper

ated

(a

ll ty

pes)

; G

rada

ll; H

y-Ho;

Hop-

To;

Pavi

ng M

ixer

s (a

ll ty

pes)

; Pi

le D

rive

rs;

Mob

ile C

oncr

ete

Mix

ers

over

14

cu.

ft.;

Bul

ldoz

ers,

Load

ers,

Trac

tova

tors

; Sc

rape

rs a

nd P

ulls;

Weld

ers;

Tren

chin

g M

achi

nes;

Rol

ler,

ten

ton

s or

ove

r; A

ir C

ompr

esso

r G

Air

Tug

ger;

Boi

lers

, tw

o or

mor

e fir

ed b

y on

e ma

n;

Heav

y Du

ty M

echa

nic;

All

othe

r eq

uipm

ent

of s

imila

r na

ture

com

ing

unde

r th

e He

avy

Equi

pmen

t C

lass

ifica

tion,

whe

n po

wer

oper

ated

FE

DE

RA

L

RE

GIS

TE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

--F

RID

AY

, O

CT

OB

ER

2

4,

19

75

49964 NOTICES

SUPE

RSEDEAS

DECISION

STAT

E:

Texas

COUN

TY:

Bowie

DECI

SION

NO.

: , T

X75-

4165

DA

TE:

Date

of

Publ

icat

ion

Supe

rsed

es D

ecisi

on N

o. TX

75-4

104;

dat

ed M

ay 2

3, 1

975,

in

40 F

R 22

796.

DE

SCRI

PTIO

N OF

WOR

K: Bu

ildin

g C

onst

ruct

ion,

(ex

clud

ing

sing

le f

amily

ho

mes

and

gard

en t

ype

apar

tmen

ts up

to

and

incl

udin

g 4

stor

ies)

. (S

ee

curr

ent

heav

y &

high

way

gene

ral

wage

det

erm

inat

ion

for

Pavi

ng &

Uti

litie

s In

cide

ntal

to

Build

ing

Con

stru

ctio

n).

-B

osi

eFr

ing'

e B

onef

H•

P fl

ymen

te

Rote

sH

i*Pe

nsio

naV

ocot

ion

App

. Tt

.

ASBE

STOS

WOR

KERS

$8.7

8.3

0.5

1.0

25BO

ILERM

AKER

S8.

00.5

9.7

6.0

2BR

ICKL

AYER

S & S

TONE

MASO

NS7.

75.2

0CA

RPEN

TERS

:Ca

rpen

ters

6.95

.01

Mill

wri

ghts

8.85

.04

Pile

driv

erm

en .

7.55

.01

CEME

NT M

ASON

S6.

91.1

5.0

3«

ELEC

TRIC

IANS

8.10

.40

17.1/4

%EL

EVAT

OR C

ONST

RUCT

ORS

8.21

.445

.29

37.+a

-tb.0

2i E

LEVA

TOR

CONS

TRUC

TORS

’ HE

LPER

S70%

JR.4

45.2

937.

-H»-rt>

.02

! ELE

VATO

R CO

NSTR

UCTO

RS '

HELP

ERS

(PROB

.)50

7JR

IRONW

ORKE

RS8.

50.3

0.3

5.0

4LA

BORE

RS, U

NSKI

LLED

2.85

LINE

CON

STRU

CTIO

N:Li

nema

n8.

5017.

1/2%

1 Ca

ble

splic

er8.

755

17.

1/2%

| H

ole

digg

er o

pera

tor;

Hea

vy e

quip

-me

nt o

pera

tors

(or

pol

e ca

teq

uiva

lent

); po

wderm

an7.

735

1%1/2

7.Li

ne t

ruck

dri

ver

(win

ch o

pera

tor]

6.97

u1/2

7.Ja

ckha

mmer

man

6.37

51%

1/27.

Grou

ndma

n5.

695

t%1/2

%Gr

ound

man,

1st

year

4.25

17.

1/2%

Truc

k dr

iver

(fl

at b

ed,

ton

&ha

lf 6

unde

r)6.

035

17.

1/2%

PAIN

TERS

:GR

OUP

1 -

Brus

h5.

50GR

OUP"

2 -

Spra

y6.

90CR

OUP

3 -

Brus

h st

ruct

ural

ste

el,

Iron

A g

alva

nize

d pi

pe;

Pain

ters

work

ing

from

win

dow

jack

s6.

60GR

OUP

4 •

Brus

h st

ruct

ural

ste

el,

Iron

A g

alva

nize

d pi

pe o

ver

40 f

tup

(t

down

to

grou

nd;

Brus

h sw

ing-

ing

stag

e A

chai

r wo

rk6.

95GR

OUP

5 -

Brus

h sw

ingi

ng s

tage

&ch

air

work

ove

r 40

ft.

up

& do

wn!

to g

roun

d7.

25GR

OUP

6 -

Spra

y, sa

ndbl

aste

rs &

powe

r to

ols

7.50

GROU

P 7

- Sp

ray,

san

dbla

ster

s &

powe

r to

ols

over

40

ft.

up &

j do

wn t

o gr

ound

7.75

DECI

SION

NO

1X75

-416

5

PLUM

BERS

& P

IPEF

ITTE

RS

ROOF

ERS

SHEE

T ME

TAL

WORK

ERS

•SO

FT F

LOOR

LAY

ERS

SPRI

NKLE

R FI

TTER

S TR

UCK

DRIV

ERS

WE1D

ERS

- re

ceiv

e ra

te p

resc

ribe

d fo

r cr

aft

perf

orm

ing

oper

atio

n to

wh

ich w

eldin

g is

inc

iden

tal.

FOOT

NOTE

S:a

- 1s

t 6

mos

. -

none

; 6

mos

. to

5

yrs.

- 2

7.; o

ver

5 yr

s, -

4% o

fba

sic

hour

ly r

ate

b -

Paid

Hol

iday

s A

thru

F

j PAI

D HO

LIDA

YS:

I A-N

ew Y

ears

’ Da

y; B

-Mem

orlal

Day

; I C

-Inde

pend

ence

Day

; D-

Labo

r Da

y;E-

Than

ksgi

ving

Day

; F-

Chrls

tmas

Da

y

Hou

rly

Frin

ge B

en

efi

ts P

oym

e

Pens

io

$9.0

0 A

.50

7.83

5 6.

95

10.1

0 2.A

5

.35

.50

.50

.50

.80

.05

.03

.01 .08

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49965

Page

__3

DECI

SION

NO.

TX75

-416

5

-B

asi

c

Hou

rly

Rot

es

Frin

ge B

en

efi

t, P

aym

en

t,

H &

WPe

nsi

ons

Voc

otio

nA

.,.

Tf.

POWE

R EQ

UIPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S

GROU

P l

$6,6

65.3

0.5

0.1

0GR

OUP

27.

45.3

0.5

0.1

0GR

OUP

37.

05.'3

0.5

0.1

0

POWE

R EQ

UIPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S CL

ASS I

FICA

TION

DEF

INIT

IONS

! GR

OUP

1 *

Oile

r-Fi

rem

an1

GROU

P Z

- A

ir C

ompr

esso

rs,

Pump

s, W

eldin

g M

achi

nes,

Thr

ottle

,Val

ves,

Ligh

t Pl

ants

; Co

nvey

or;

Wag

on D

rill;

Ele

vato

rs B

uild

ing;

For

m G

rade

rs;

Hol

st,

' Sin

gle

Drum

; Fo

rd T

ract

or i

nclu

ding

bla

de a

nd m

ower

on r

ear;

Mix

ers,

less

I

than

14

cubi

c fe

et;

Scre

enin

g Pl

ants

; Cr

ushi

ng' P

lant

s; F

ork

Lift

s (s

hort

,1

unde

r 25

fee

t);

Conc

rete

Pum

ps (a

ll ty

pes)

; Bo

bcat

typ

e eq

uipm

ent;

All

j ot

her

equi

pmen

t of

sim

ilar

natu

re c

onin

g un

der

the

Ligh

t Eq

uipm

ent

Cla

ssif

ica

tion,

whe

n po

wer

oper

ated

GROU

P 3

• Fo

rd T

ract

or o

r lik

e w

ith a

ny a

ttach

men

t (e

xcep

t bl

ade

and

mowe

r on

re

ar);

Dri

lling

Mac

hine

(al

l ty

pes)

; Sc

oopm

oblle

; H

olst

s, tw

o dr

um o

r m

ore;

Fork

lifts

(ov

er 2

5 ft

«);

Winc

h Tr

uck;

Six

Whe

el Tr

hck,

whe

n us

ed c

ontin

uous

ly

I fo

r 5

days

; M

ixer

mob

lle;

Loco

mot

ives

; M

ixer

s, 14

cub

ic f

t, o

r ov

er;

Blad

e I

Gra

ders

, se

lf-pr

opel

led;

Cab

leway

s; Cr

ancs

-puw

er o

pera

ted

to 1

00 f

t.;

Der

rick

s, po

wer

oper

ated

(al

l ty

pes)

; G

rada

ll; H

y-Ho;

Hop-

To;

Pavi

ng M

ixers

(al

l ty

pes)

; Pi

le D

rive

rs;

Mob

ile C

oncr

ete

Mix

ers

over

14

cu,

ft«;

Bul

ldoz

ers,

Load

ers,

Trac

tova

tors

; Sc

rape

rs a

nd P

ulls

; W

elder

s; Tr

ench

ing

Mac

hine

s; R

olle

r, t

en t

ons

or o

ver:

Air

Com

pres

sor

& A

ir T

ugge

r; B

oile

rs,

two

or m

ore

fired

by

one

man;

Heav

y Du

ty M

echa

nic;

All

othe

r eq

uipm

ent

of - s

imila

r na

ture

com

ing

unde

r th

e i

Heav

y Eq

uipm

ent

Cla

ssifi

catio

n, w

hen

powe

r op

erat

ed

FE

DE

RA

L

RE

GIS

TE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

---F

RID

AY

, O

CT

OB

ER

2

4,

19

75

49966 NOTICES

SUPE

RSE

DE

AS

DE

CIS

ION

STAT

E:

Texa

s CO

UNTY

: Bra* os

DECI

SION

NO.

» TX

75-4

166

DATE

: Da

te o

f Pu

blic

atio

nSupersedes D

ecisi

on No. 1

X75-

4106

, da

ted

May

23,

1975

, in 4

0 FR

22 7

99.

DESC

RIPT

ION

OF W

ORK:

Buil

ding

Construction, (

excluding

single f

amily

homes

and

gard

en t

ype

apartments u

p to and i

ncluding 4

stories).

(See

current

heav

y &

high

way

general

wage

dét

ermi

nâti

on f

or P

avin

g & Util

itie

s

Bo

sic

Hou

rly

Rote

s

Frin

ge B

ene

fi%

Poym

ents

H &

WR

ent i

ons

Voc

otio

nAp

p- T

r.

ASBE

STOS

WOR

KERS

$8.9

5.7

0.7

0.0

6BO

ILERM

AKER

S8

.00

.50

.76

.02

BRIC

KLAY

ERS

9.21

.38.4

0.0

5CA

RPEN

TERS

7.80

CEME

NT M

ASON

S8.

32.4

9.42

.05

ELEC

TRIC

IANS

9.65

.30

31

•04

ELEV

ATOR

CON

STRU

CTOR

S8

.21

.445

y29

37

,+a

-tb

.02

EUJV

ATOR

CON

STRU

CTOR

S' HE

LPER

S70

7.JR

.445

12

93

%+

a+

b.0

2

EIEV

AT0R

CON

STRU

CTOR

S' HE

LPER

S1

(PRO

B.)

507J

RGL

AZIE

RS8

.22

.475

.20

e0

1

IRONW

ORKE

RS8.

77.5

5.7

0.0

75LA

BORE

RS:

GROU

P 1

3.61

.28

.20

.02

GROU

P 2

3.71

.28

.20

.02

GROU

P 3

3.81

.28

.20

.02

GROU

P 4

3.76

.28

.20

.02

GROU

P 5

3.86

.28

.20

.02

GROU

P 6

4.01

.28.2

0.0

2

LABO

RERS

CLA

SSIF

ICAT

ION

DEFI

NITI

ONS

GROU

P 1

* C

onst

ruct

ion

labo

r, i

nclu

ding

exc

avat

ion,

con

cret

e wo

rk,

rein

forc

ing,

^m

ason

han

dler

and

whe

eler

(st

ock

pile

), a

spha

lt ir

oner

and

rak

er,

wate

r pr

oofin

g te

nder

, pi

pe l

ayer

(no

n-m

etal

lic),

pump

cre

te p

ipe

(han

dlin

g an

d la

ying

) an

d al

l bu

ildin

g co

nstr

uctio

n la

bor

exce

ptin

g th

at h

erei

naft

er

clas

sifi

ed;

wind

ow w

ashe

r, qa

rpen

ters

ten

der,

cem

ent

maso

n te

nder

, vi

brat

or

oper

ator

; ot

her

mec

hani

c te

nder

(ex

cept

as

othe

rwise

cla

ssif

ied)

; Du

mper

&

spot

ter

vGR

OUP

2 -

Air

too

l op

erat

or

GROU

P 3

- W

ell d

rille

rGR

OUP

4 -

Cut

ting

torc

h ma

n; m

ason

ten

der;

mas

on h

andl

ers

& w

heel

ers

hand

ling

mat

eria

l fro

m f

irst

sto

ck'p

ile;

conc

rete

pip

e (h

andl

ing

and

layi

ng);

san

d bl

aste

r; p

ower

bur.

r.v o

pera

tor;

pla

ster

er.tè

nder

& h

od, c

arri

er;

lath

er t

ende

r;

wel

l dr

iller

ten

der

GROU

P 5

- To

ol r

oom

tend

er;

mor

tar

mix

er (

hoe

and

othe

rwise

); B

last

er,

powd

er m

an;

guni

te w

orke

r GR

OUP

6 -

Gun

ite n

ozzle

man

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—I

Pa

ge _

____

_2

DECI

SION

NO. T

X75-

4166

Ba

tic

Frin

ge B

en

efi

ts P

aym

ents

Hou

rly

H &

WPe

nsi

ons

Voc

otio

nApp

. Tf

.R

òte*

LINE

CON

STRU

CTIO

N:

\Li

neme

n &

cabl

e sp

licer

s$9

.72

.40

17.1/

27.

Grou

ndma

n5.

94.4

01%

1/27.

Grou

ndma

n (1

st y

ear)

4.30

.40

17.1/2

7.MA

RBLE

MAS

ONS

. PA

INTE

RS:

8.41

.25

Brus

h4.

75Sp

ray

5.00

Rol

ler

4.50

PLAS

TERE

RS8.

72.4

2.5

25.0

2PL

UMBE

RS &

PIP

EFIT

TERS

8.21

.25

.03

SHEE

T ME

TAL

WORK

ERS

8.98

5.2

25.4

75.2

0.0

25SO

FT F

LOOR

LAY

ERS

8.42

.35.2

0.0

9i T

ERRA

ZZ0

WORK

ERS

8.41

.25

TILE

SET

TERS

| WEL

DERS

- r

ecei

ve r

ate

pres

crib

ed8.

41.2

5

: fo

r cr

aft

perf

orm

ing

oper

atio

n to

1

which

weld

ing

is I

ncid

enta

l

j FOO

TNOT

ES:

a -

1st

6 m

os.

- no

ne;

6 m

os.

to 5

yrs.

- 2

%; o

ver

5 yr

s. -

41 o

f ba

sic h

ourl

y ra

tes

b -

Paid

Hol

iday

s A

thru

F

PAID

HOL

IDAY

S :A-

New

Year

s' Da

y; B

-Mem

orial

Day

; C-

Inde

pend

ence

Day

; D-

Labo

r Da

y;| E

-Tha

nksg

ivin

g Da

y; F

-Chr

istm

as

Day

OCTO

BER

24,

1975

NOTICES 49967

Page_

3

DECISION NO. T

X75-

4166

■Bo

tieHo

urly

Rote

s

Frin

g'e

Bene

fits

Paym

ents

H It

WPe

nsio

nsVo

catio

n -

App.

Ti.

POWE

R EQ

UIPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S

GROU

P 1

$8,8

8.35

.65

.04

GROU

P 2

7.52

.35

.65

»04

GROU

P 3

7.03

. .3

5.6

5.0

4GR

OUP

46.

87.3

5.6

5.0

4

POWE

R r.QUIPA’.t)T O

PERATORS C

.LAS

SmOA

TTOM

DEP

TNTT

TOME

j GR

OUP

1 -

Heav

y Du

ty M

echa

nic;

Bla

de G

rade

r, Se

lf-pr

opel

led;

Bul

l Cl

an;

Back

I

~pilT

er;

Der

rick-

powe

r op

erat

ed (

all

type

s);

Clan

she

ll; D

ragl

ines

; Pu

sh C

at !

Ope

rato

r; B

ull

Doze

r &

all

type

s Ca

t Tr

acto

rs;

Cabl

e-Way

; Ba

ckho

e; S

hove

l, po

wer

oper

ated

; Cr

ane,

powe

r op

erat

ed

(all

type

s);

Elev

atin

g G

rade

r, Se

lf-

! pr

opel

led;

llo

ist,

Mot

or-D

riven

, Tw

o Dr

ums

or m

ore;

Mix

Mob

ile;

Wat

er W

ell

j D

rilli

ng M

achi

nes,

used

on

cons

truc

tion;

Bui

ldin

g El

evat

or,

used

on

con

stru

ctio

n; T

ug B

oat

Ope

rato

r, as

signe

d to

con

stru

ctio

n; W

inch

Truc

k; L

oco

mot

ive

Cran

e; Co

ncre

te M

ixer

, 14

cub

ic f

eet

or m

ore;

Pavi

ng M

ixer

(al

l ty

pes)

; !‘

Pile

Dri

ver;

Scr

aper

, he

avy

type

, ov

er 3

cub

ic ya

rds;

Tre

nchi

ng M

achi

nes

(all

j si

zes)

; G

rada

ll; H

igh-

Lift;

Fou

ndat

ion

Borin

g M

achi

ne;

Gas

olin

e or

Die

sel-

| D

riven

Weld

ing

Mac

hine

s, 7

or m

ore;

Pum

pcro

te M

achi

nr O

pera

tor;

Tur

napu

ll3;

| DW

-10 C

ater

pilla

r, S

-IS

Eucl

id a

nd s

imila

r tr

acto

rs;

Asph

alt

Plan

t M

ixer

! O

pera

tor

on j

ob;

Crus

her

Ope

rato

r on

job

; Sc

oopm

obile

s; Fo

rklif

t us

ed o

n co

n-l

stru

ctio

n •(n

ot i

nclu

ding

war

ehou

sing)

; W

ell P

oint

Pum

p; Co

ncre

te B

atch

P*.a

nt!

Ope

rato

r; P

neum

atic

Rol

lers

, se

lf-pr

opel

led;

All

othe

r, eq

uipm

ent

of s

imila

r I

natu

re co

min

g un

der

the

Heav

y Eq

uipm

ent

Cla

ss,

when

pow

er op

erat

ed1

GROU

P 2 -

Air

Com

pres

sors

; Bl

ade

Gra

der,

Towe

d;

Flex

Plan

e;

Form

Gra

der;

Con

-I

cret

fe M

ixer

, le

ss t

han

14 c

ubic

fee

t; P

umps

; Pu

lsom

eter

; Tr

uck

Cran

e D

rive

r;G

asol

ine

or d

iese

l dr

iven

wel

ding

mac

hine

s (o

n 3

or m

ore,

up t

o 6

mac

hine

s);I

Hoi

st, S

ingl

e Dr

um;

Scra

per,

3 cu

bic

yard

s or

les

s; W

hgon

D

rill

Ope

rato

r; C

on

veyo

r; G

ener

ator

, G

asol

ine

or d

iese

l dr

iven

, ov

er 1

500

wat

ts;

Rubb

er T

ired

Farm

Tra

ctor

with

atta

chm

ents;

A l

ight

equ

ipm

ent

oper

ator

may

run

1 o

r 2

105

cfm c

ompr

esso

rs;

All

othe

r eq

uipm

ent

of s

imila

r na

ture

com

ing

unde

r th

e Li

ght

Equi

pmen

t C

lass

, wh

en p

ower

ope

rate

d GR

OUP

3 -

Fire

man

GR

OUP

4 -

Oile

r

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49968 NOTICES

STATE:

Texas

COUN

TY:

Bexa

rDE

CISI

ON N

O.:

TX75

-416

4 DA

TE:

Date

of

Publ

icat

ion

Supe

rsed

es D

ecisi

on N

o. TX

75-4

109,

date

d Ma

y 30

, 19

75,

in 4

0 FR

236

90.

DECI

SION

NO. J

X75-

4164

DESC

RIPT

ION

OF W

ORK:

Res

iden

tial

cons

truc

tion

cons

istin

g of

sin

gle

fam

ilyBa

sie

Frin

ge B

enef

its P

aym

ents

home

s an

d ga

rden

typ

e ap

artm

ents

up t

o an

din

clud

ing

4 st

orie

s.IN

CIDE

NTAL

PAV

ING

& UT

ILIT

IES

Hour

ly&

SITE

PRE

PARA

TION

Rate

sH

& WPe

nsio

nsVa

catio

nAp

p. Tr

.Fr

ing'e

Bene

fitX

’ —.

’ ..

....

. V

Hour

lyA

ir T

ool

Man

$2 .7

5Ro

tes

H & W

Pens

ions

App.

Tr.

Asph

alt

Heat

erm

an2.

75As

phal

t Ra

ker

3.00

AIR

COND

ITIO

NING

INS

TALL

ERS

$3,5

0A

spha

lt Sh

ovel

er2.

50BR

ICKL

AYER

S7.

27.3

0.3

0.0

5Ba

tterb

oard

Set

ter

2.50

CARP

ENTE

RS4.

10Ca

rpen

ter

3.75

CEME

NT M

ASON

S7.

02.2

5Ca

rpen

ter

Help

er2.

80DU

CT I

NSTA

LLER

S3.

45Co

ncre

te F

inish

er (

Pavi

ng)

3.60

ELEC

TRIC

IANS

:Co

ncre

te F

inish

er H

elper

(Pa

ving

)2.

95Si

ngle

or

mul

tiple

fam

ily d

wel

l-Co

ncre

te F

inish

er (

Stru

ctur

es)

3.65

ings

or

apar

tmen

ts up

to

and

| Con

cret

e Fi

nish

er H

elpe

r(St

ruct

ure

) 3.

00in

clud

ing

8 un

its n

ot e

xcee

ding

! Con

cret

e Ru

bber

2.50

2 st

orie

s '

5.55

.30

17.

l/27.

Ele

ctri

cian

6.50

Over

8 u

nits

or

over

2 s

tori

es8.

33.2

5517.

1/2%

Ele

ctri

cian

Help

er3.

20J F

ORM

SETT

ERS

3.29

Form

Bui

lder

(St

ruct

ures

)3.

85i G

LAZI

ERS

3.50

; For

m Bu

ilder

Help

er (

Stru

ctur

es)1

2.95

INSU

LATI

ON I

NSTA

LLER

S4.

50Fo

rm S

ette

r (P

avin

g an

d Cu

rb)

3.75

IRON

WORK

ERS

4.66

Form

Set

ter

Help

er (

Pavi

ng &

Cur

b)3.

00LA

BORE

RS. U

NSKI

LLED

2.34

Form

Set

ter

(Str

uctu

res)

3.50

j PAI

NTER

S”3.

675

Form

Set

ter

Help

er (

Stru

ctur

es)

2.75

TAPE

& F

LOAT

4.00

Labo

rer,

Comm

on2.

251 P

LAST

ERER

S7.

40.0

1La

bore

r, U

tilit

y Ma

n2.

501 P

LUMB

ERS

& PI

PEFI

TTER

S7.

13.2

5.3

5.1

0M

anho

le Bu

ilder

, Br

ick

2.75

*RO

OFER

S3.

10M

echa

nic

4.10

ROOF

ERS,

SHIN

GLES

3.50

Mec

hani

c H

elper

3.00

SHEE

TROC

K IN

STAL

LER

4.00

Oile

r3.

00SO

FT F

LOOR

LAY

ERS

3.71

Serv

icem

an3.

00TI

LE S

ETTE

RS5.

18Pa

inte

r (S

truc

ture

s)4.

90TR

UCK

DRIV

ERS

2.25

.Pai

nter

Help

er (

Stru

ctur

es)

3.00

T.V,

ANT

ENNA

INS

TALL

ERS

3.50

Piled

rlver

men

5.30

POWE

R EQ

UIPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S:Pi

pela

yer

3.00

Fork

lif

ts2.

75Pi

pela

yer

Help

er2.

75Fo

unda

tion

drill

ope

rato

rPo

wderm

an3.

75(c

raw

ler

mou

nted

)5.

85Po

wderm

an H

elper

2.50

Fron

t en

d lo

ader

2.58

Rei

nfor

cing

Ste

el S

ette

r(St

ruct

urei

) 3.

65Tr

acto

r3.

75R

einf

orci

ng S

teel

Set

ter

Help

er2.

70St

eel

Wor

ker

(Str

uctu

ral)

4.30

Spre

ader

Box

Man

3.25

Swam

per

3.00

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49969

Paee

*

DECI

SION

NO.

TX75

-416

4

INCI

DENT

AL P

AVIN

G &

UT

ILIT

IES

& SI

TE P

REPA

RATI

ON

Bo

sie

Frin

ge B

enef

it*

Poym

ents

Rote

*H

& W

Fen*

Ion*

Voca

tion

Aw

. Tf

.

Powe

r Eq

uipm

ent

Ope

rato

rs:

Asph

alt

Dist

ribu

tor

3.25

Asph

alt

Pavi

ng M

achi

ne3.

45Br

oom

or S

weep

er O

pera

tor

2.70

Bulld

ozer

, 15

0 HP

and

Les

s3.

25Bu

lldoz

er,

over

150

HP

3.50

Cran

e, C

lam

shel

l, Ba

choc

, Der

rick

,D

ragl

ine,

Shov

el (l

ess

than

1%

Cl)

3.65

Cran

e, C

lam

shel

l, Ba

ckho

e, D

errl

clD

ragl

ine,

Sho

vel

(1% C

Y &

Ov

er)

4.40

Crus

her

or S

cree

ning

Pla

nt O

p.3.

751

Foun

datio

n D

rill

Ope

rato

r (C

rawl

etM

ount

ed)

6.00

Foun

datio

n D

rill

Ope

rato

r (T

ruck

Mou

nted

)6.

00Fo

unda

tion

Dri

ll O

pera

tor

Help

er3.

55j

Fron

t En

d Lo

ader

(2%

CY

and

Less

)3.

251

Fron

t En

d Lo

ader

(Ov

er 2

% CY

)4.

001

Mot

or G

rade

r O

pera

tor,

Fine

Gra

de4.

25!

Mot

or G

rade

r O

pera

tor

3.75

Rol

ler,

Ste

el W

heel

(Pla

nt‘'M

ixPa

vem

ents)

2.75

Rol

ler,

Ste

el W

heel

(Oth

er*F

lat

Whe

el or

Tam

ping

)2.

85R

olle

r, P

neum

atic

(Sel

f-Pro

pelle

d)2.

50Sc

rape

rs (

17 C

Y an

d Le

ss)

3.00

Scra

pers

(Ov

er 1

7 CY

)3.

50Tr

acto

r (C

rawl

er T

ype)

150

HP

and

Less

2.50

Trac

tor

(Cra

wler

Typ

e) o

ver

150

HP3.

35

.Tr

acto

r (P

neum

atic)

80

HP a

nd L

ess

2.50

Trac

tor

(Pne

umat

ic) o

ver

80 H

P3.

25Tr

ench

ing

Mac

hine

, Li

ght

3.50

Tren

chin

g M

achi

ne,

Heav

y3.

50W

agon

Dri

ll, B

orin

g M

achi

ne o

rPo

st H

ole

Dri

ller

Ope

rato

r3.

50Tr

uck

Driv

ers:

Sing

le A

xle,

Lig

ht2.

50Si

ngle

Axl

e, H

eavy

2.50

Tand

em A

xle

or S

emitr

aile

r2.

75Lo

wboy

~Floa

t3.

25W

inch

3.50

Weld

er4.

00W

elder

Help

er3.

30

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

IST

ER

, V

OL

. 4

0,

NO

. 2

07---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49970 NOTICES

SUPE

RSEDEAS DE

CISI

ONP

ag

e___

_2_

ST

AT

E:

Te

xa

s

COUN

TIES

: Bell,

Booq

ue, Coryell,

Falls, H

ill

& Mc

Lenn

anDE

CISI

ON N

O.:

TX75

-416

2 DA

TE:

Date

of P

ublic

atio

nSu

pers

edes

Dec

ision

No.

TX75

-411

0, da

ted

May

30,

1975

, in

40

FR 2

3 6 92

, DE

SCRI

PTIO

N OF

WOR

K: Bu

ildin

g C

onst

ruct

ion,

(ex

clud

ing

sing

le f

amily

hom

es an

d ga

rden

typ

e ap

artm

ents

up t

o an

d In

clud

ing

4 st

orie

s).

(See

cur

rent

he

avy

& h

ighwa

y ge

nera

l wa

ge d

eter

min

atio

n fo

r Pa

ving

& U

tilit

ies

Inci

dent

al

_to

Build

ing

Con

stru

ctio

n in

Bos

que,

Fal

ls,

Hill

f. M

cLen

nan

Cou

ntie

s).

BUIL

DING

CON

STRU

CTIO

NBa

sic

Hour

lyRo

tes

Frin

ge B

enef

its P

aym

ents

H & W

Pens

ions

Voco

tion

App.

Tr.

ASBE

STOS

WOR

KERS

:ZO

NE l

- B

ell.

Cor

yell

& Fa

llsCo

untie

s$8

.43

.35.4

5.0

8ZO

NE 2

- B

osqu

e. H

ill &

McL

enna

nCo

unt i

es8.

78.3

0.5

1.0

25BO

ILERM

AKER

S8.

00.5

0.7

6 ■

.02

BRIC

KLAY

ERS

8.10

.55

.03

CARP

ENTE

RS:

Carp

ente

rs:

ZONE

1 -

Bel

l &

Cor

vell

Coun

ties

7.30

ZONE

2 «

• Bos

que.

Falls

. H

ill &

McL

enna

n Co

untie

s7.

34.1

8M

illw

righ

ts &

pile

driv

erm

en:

ZONE

1 -

Bos

que,

Falls

, H

ill &

McL

enna

n Co

untie

s7.

74.1

8CE

MENT

MAS

ONS

7.59

.35

.20

ELEC

TRIC

UNS

:ZO

NE 1

-Bo

sque

, F

alls

, H

ill &

McL

enna

n C

ount

ies;

Par

ts o

f B

ell

& C

orye

ll Co

untie

s no

rth

of C

ow-

hous

e Cr

eek

8.45

17.1/4

7,ZO

NE 2

» P

arts

of B

ell

& C

orye

llC

ount

ies

sout

h of

Cow

hous

e Cr

eek

9.30

17..87

.EL

EVAT

OR C

ONST

RUCT

ORS

8.21

.445

.29

37,+a

+b.0

2EL

EVAT

OR C

ONST

RUCT

ORS'

HELP

ERS

70%

JR.4

45.2

93%

+a-rt>

.0?

ELEV

ATOR

CON

STRU

CTOR

S' HE

LPER

S(P

ROB.

)50

7JR

GLAZ

IERS

5.90

IRONW

ORKE

RS

,7.

49.55

.60

.12

LABO

RERS

:U

nski

lled

,2.

97M

ason

ten

ders

3.55

Mor

tar

mix

ers

3.55

LATH

ERS-

7.30

.30

.50

.05

DECI

SION

NO. T

X75-

4162

Bo si

cFr

inge

Ben

efits

Pay

men

tsBU

IIDIN

G CO

NSTR

UCTI

ONRo

tes

H & W

Pens

ions

Voco

tion

App.

Tr.

LINE

CON

STRU

CTIO

N:Li

nem

en;

Line

men

oper

ator

s$9

.86

17.1/2

7.Ca

ble

splic

er10

.85

1%1/2

7.Gr

ound

man,

1st

6 mo

nths

5.92

17.1/2

7.Gr

ound

man,

2nd

6 m

onth

s6.

4117.

1/2%

Grou

ndma

n, 1

year

& o

ver

6.90

17.1/2

%PA

INTE

RS:

1ZO

NE 1

- B

osqu

e, C

orye

ll,.F

alls

.-

Hill

& M

cLen

nan

Cou

nties

:Br

ush

6.10

| B

oile

r pi

pes

& st

eel,

stru

ctur

est

eel,

wind

ow j

acks

, ro

ofs,

stag

e wo

rk,

smok

e st

ack,

wat

erto

wer

s, bo

atsw

ain

chai

r6.

60Am

es to

ols

for

dry

wal

ls6.

70Sp

ray

work

& s

elf

feed

ing

.rol

lers

6.85

Stea

m c

lean

ing,

san

dbla

stin

g &

haza

rdou

s wo

rk7.

20ZO

NE 2

- B

ell

Coun

ty:

Brus

h4.

40Ta

pers

, flo

ater

& d

ry w

all

finis

hers

4.65

Stag

e wo

rk;

Boat

swai

n ch

air

4.90

Wind

ow j

acks

, st

eel

brus

hing

4.87

5Sp

ray,

san

dbla

stin

g5.

65PL

ASTE

RERS

9.00

.25

.10

.01

PLUM

BERS

& P

IPEF

ITTE

RS :

ZONE

1 -

Are

a w

ithin

a 3

5 m

ilera

dius

of

Wac

o, in

clud

ing

Tem

ple

Mar

lin,

Clif

ton

& H

illsb

oro

7.80

.30

.30

.03

ZONE

2 -

All

othe

r ar

eas

8.20

.30

.30

.03

ROOF

ERS:

Slat

e, t

ile,

asb

esto

s, ro

ofin

g &

sidin

g5.

95.0

3Co

mpo

sitio

n, b

uilt-

up,

damp

&w

ater

proo

fing

5.80

.03

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49971

DECI

SION

NO

TX75

-416

2

buii

din

g c

onst

ruct

ion

SHEE

T ME

TAL

WORK

ERS :

ZONE

I -

With

in a

rad

ius

of 2

Q m

iles

from

the

MeL

enna

n Co

unty

Co

urt-h

ouse

, W

aco

ZONE

2 *

Ove

r 20

mile

s hu

t le

ss

than

45

mile

s ZO

NE 3

- O

ver

45 m

iles

SPRI

NKLE

R FI

TTER

S TR

UCK

DRIV

ERS

Hourl

yRo

tes

Frin

ge B

e

$8.2

2

8.72

9.22

10.1

02.

80.5

0.8

0

WELD

ERS

- re

ceiv

e ra

te p

resc

ribe

d fo

r cr

aft

perf

orm

ing

oper

atio

n to

wh

ich w

eldin

g is

inc

iden

tal

nefit

i Pa

ymen

ts

App.

Tr.

.05

.05

.05

.08

jFOO

TNOT

ES:

I a '•

1st

o m

os.

- no

ne«

6 m

os.

to 5

yr

s. -

ov

er 5

yrs

. -

h%

of b

asic

hou

rly

mte

s jb

* P

aid H

olid

ays

A th

ru F

i PAI

D HO

LIDA

YS»

I A-N

ew Y

ears

* Da

y; R

-Mem

ofial

Day

; C-

Inde

pend

ence

Day

; D-

Labo

r Da

y;E

-Tha

nksg

ivin

g D

ay;

F-C

hrls

tmas

Da

y

FE

DE

RA

L

RE

GIS

TE

R,

VO

L.

AO

, N

O.

Page

4

DECI

SION

NO.

TX75

-416

2

BUIL

DING

CON

STRU

CTIO

NBa

sic

Hour

lyRa

tes

Fring

e Ben

efits

Paym

ents

H &

W .

Pens

ions

Voca

tion

APP

Tr.

POW

ER E

QUIP

MEN

T OP

ERAT

ORS

GROU

P 1

$7.3

8.4

0GR

OUP

26.

46.4

0GR

OUP

35.

43:

.40

GROU

P 4

5.33

.40

POWE

R EQ

UIPM

ENT

OPER

ATOR

S CL

ASSI

FICA

TION

DEF

INIT

IONS

CROU

P 1

- He

avy

Duty

Mec

hani

c; B

lade

Gra

der

- Se

lf-pr

opel

led;

Bul

l Cl

am;

Back

F

iller

; D

erri

cks,

powe

r op

erat

ed (

all

type

s);

Dra

glin

e; P

ush

Cat

Ope

rato

r;Eu

clid

Ope

rato

r; B

ull

Doze

r an

d al

l ty

pes

of C

at T

ract

ors;

Cab

le-W

ay;

Back

Hoe

; Cr

ane,

Powe

r Op

erat

ed (

all

type

s);

Elev

atin

g G

rade

r, se

lf-pr

opel

led;

Hol

st,

Mot

or-

Dri

ven,

two

dru

ms o

r m

ore;

Mix

Mob

ile;

Hlg

h-L

lfts

& Lo

ader

s, ov

er 1

/3 c

u. y

d.|

capa

city

; W

inch

Truc

k; L

ocom

otiv

e; M

ixer

, 14

cu.

ft.

or

over

; Pa

ving

Mixe

r (a

ll si

zes)

; Sc

rape

r; T

renc

hing

Mac

hine

(al

l si

zes)

; G

rada

ll; F

ound

atio

n Bo

ring

Mac

hine

; Sc

oopm

oblle

; Sh

ovel

, Po

wer

Ope

rate

d; P

ump

Cret

e M

achi

ne;

Clam

She

ll O

pera

tor;

Rock

Cru

sher

Ope

rate

d oh

Job

; W

eldin

g M

achi

ne,.

6 to

12;

Two

125

cu.

ft.

Com

pr

esso

rs;

Well

poi

nts,

incl

udin

g in

stal

latio

ns

GROU

P 2

- Bl

ade

Gra

der,

Towe

d; F

lex

Plan

e; F

orm

Gra

der;

Mix

er,

less

tha

n 14

cu.

ft.

; Pu

lsom

eter

; Tr

uck

Cran

e D

rive

r &

Oile

r, C

ombi

natio

n ma

n; G

asol

ine

or D

iese

l Dr

iven

W

eldin

g M

achi

ne,

3 to

6;

Hol

st,

Sing

le D

rum;

Pum

p, 2*i

in.

or

larg

er;

Pneu

mat

ic R

olle

r; H

igh-

Lift

s &

Load

ers,

1/3

cu.

yd.

or l

ess;

For

klift

, 15

00 l

bs.

capa

city

or

les

s; A

ir C

ompr

esso

rs,

anyt

ime

ther

e ar

e tw

o or

mor

e at

tach

men

ts op

erat

ing

on

I a

125

cu.

ft.

com

pres

sor,

a lig

ht e

quip

men

t op

erat

or s

hall

be e

mpl

oyed

. On

e 12

5 j

cu.

ft.

air

com

pres

sor

and

one

weld

ing

mac

hine

req

uire

s no

ope

rato

r. O

ne 1

25

cu.

ft.

com

pres

sor

and-

two

wel

ding

mac

hine

s or

any

2 a

ir c

ompr

esso

rs e

quiv

alen

t to

a 1

25 c

u. f

t. a

ir c

ompr

esso

r re

quir

es a

lig

ht e

quip

men

t op

erat

or

GROU

P 3

- Fi

rem

an

cklU

P 4

- O

iler

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49972 NOTICES

Page

___

5,P

age_

__6.

DEC

ISIO

N N

O.

TX75

-416

2-

. 'j

Botic

INCI

DENT

AL P

AVIN

G &

UTIL

ITIE

SHo

urly

(Bel

l &

cory

ell

coun

ties

)Ro

te*

H & W

Pens

ion*

Voco

tlon

Arp

. T

t.

Air

Too

l Ma

n$2

.80

Asph

alt

Heat

erm

an3.

40As

phal

t Ra

ker

3.25

Batc

hing

Pla

nt S

calem

an3.

75Ca

rpen

ter

4.00

Carp

ente

r H

elper

3.00

Conc

rete

Fin

isher

(St

ruct

ures

)3.

85Co

ncre

te F

inish

er H

elpe

r(St

ruct

ure

) 2.

50E

lect

rici

an6.

40Fo

rm B

uild

er (

Stru

ctur

es)

4.00

j For

m Bu

ilder

Hel

per

(Str

uctu

res)

3.25

| For

m Se

tter

(St

ruct

ures

)4.

00. F

orm

Sett

er H

elper

(St

ruct

ures

)3.

00La

bore

r, Co

mmon

2.50

Labo

rer,

Uti

lity

Man

2.90

1 Mec

hani

c4.

50j M

echa

nic

Help

er3.

801 O

iler

3.75

I Ser

vice

man

3.50

Pipe

laye

r (C

oncr

ete

& Cl

ay)

3.25

Pipe

laye

r H

elpe

r (C

oncr

ete

& Cl

ay)

.2.5

0Pl

umbe

rs:

Zone

1 •

3-5

mile

s of

Wac

o, Te

xas

incl

udin

g to

wn o

f Te

mple

7.80

.30

.30

,03

Zone

2 -

all

area

not

Inc

lude

d in

Zone

18.

20.3

0.3

0#0

3Po

wderm

an3.

75R

einf

orci

ng S

teel

S et

ter (

Stru

ctur

e!)

3.50

I Rei

nfor

cing

Ste

el S

ette

r H

elper

2.50

.Si

gn E

rect

or3.

25| S

prea

der

Box

Man

3.65

¡Swa

mper

3.30

¡Pow

er E

quip

men

t O

pera

tors

:As

phal

t D

istri

buto

r4.

00As

phal

t Pa

ving

Mac

hine

4.00

Broo

m or

Swe

eper

Ope

rato

r3.

10Bu

lldoz

er,

150

HP a

nd L

ess

3.75

Bulld

ozer

, ov

er 1

50 H

P4.

00Co

ncre

te P

avin

g Cu

ring

Mac

hine

3.50

DEC

ISIO

N N

O.

1X75

-416

2

INCI

DENT

AL -P

AVIN

G &

UTIL

ITIE

S (B

ELL

& CO

RYEL

L CO

UNTI

ESH

ourl

y

Rote

*

Powe

r Eq

uipm

ent

Ope

rato

rs (

Cont

'd)

Conc

rete

Pav

ing

Saw

Cran

e, C

lam

shel

l, Ba

ckho

e, D

erric

k - D

ragl

ine,

Sho

vel

(les

s th

an 1

% CV

Cr

ane,

Cla

msh

ell,

Back

hoe,

Der

ricl

Dra

glin

e, S

hove

l (1%

CY

& Ov

er)

Crus

her

or S

cree

ning

Pla

nt O

p, Fo

unda

tion

Dri

ll O

pera

tor

(Tru

ck

Mou

nted

)Fo

unda

tion

Dri

ll O

pera

tor

Help

er

Fron

t En

d Lo

ader

(2%

CY

and

Less

) Fr

ont

End

Load

er (

Over

2%

CY)

Mot

or G

rade

r O

pera

tor,

Fine

Gra

de

Mot

or G

rade

r O

pera

tor

Rol

ler,

Ste

el W

heel

(Pla

nt-M

ix

Pave

men

ts)R

olle

r, S

teel

Whe

el (O

ther

-Fla

t W

heel

or T

ampi

ng)

Rol

ler,

Pne

umat

ic (S

elf-P

rope

lled;

Sc

rape

rs (

17 C

Y an

d Le

ss)

Scra

pers

(Ov

er 1

7 CY

)Tr

acto

r (C

rawl

er T

ype)

150

HP

and

Less

Trac

tor

(Cra

wler

Typ

e) ov

er 1

50 H

I’ Tr

acto

r (P

neum

atic)

80

HP a

nd L

es

Trac

tor

(Pne

umat

ic) o

ver

80 H

P Tr

ench

ing

Mac

hine

, He

avy

Wag

on D

rill,

Bor

ing

Mac

hine

or

j Po

st H

ole

Dri

ller

Ope

rato

r Tr

uck

Dri

vers

:I

Sing

le A

xle,

Lig

ht

I Si

ngle

Axl

e, H

eavy

I

Tand

em A

xle

or S

emitr

aile

r Lo

wboy

-Flo

at *

Weig

hman

(Tr

uck

Scal

es)

Weld

erW

elder

Help

er

(00c

l*Om

ù- ’

4»

1 r

Frin

ge B

enef

it, P

aym

ent

$3,5

0

) 4.

00

* 4.

253.

75

5.15

3.00

3.75

4.00

4.50

4.00

3.00

3.00

2.

953.

503.

75

3.00

3.50

2.

70

3.10

3.75

3.15

/

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.

032.

504.

00

3.25

[PR

Doc

.75-

2847

3 Fi

led

10-2

3-75

;8:4

5 am

]

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75


PART V:

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Environmental Statements Under Preparation as of September 15, 1975

49976 NOTICES

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE-Forest Service

ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENTS UNDER PREPARATION AS OF SEPTEMBER 15, 1975A list of environmental statements is

here published to provide timely public information on the status of Forest Service environmental statements under preparation as of September 15, 1975. Persons interested in a particular action and environmental statement should contact the responsible official directly.

For ease in use of this list, statements are grouped by Forest Service organizational units proposing the action. Statements marked with an asterisk indicate, in total or in part, land use planning, developments, or activities within inventoried roadless areas. National Forest inventoried roadless areas are defined as roadless and undeveloped areas 5,000 acres; or larger, except that smaller areas adjoining existing Wilderness and Primitive Areas could be included. Existing Wilderness and Primitive Areas are excluded from this definition.

Forest Service field addresses are given at the end of the listing of environmental statements.

R. M ax P eterson, Deputy Chief, Forest Service.


FORE

ST SERVICE ENV

IRONMENTAL S

TATEMENTS

UNDE

R PR

EPAR

ATIO

N AS

OF "

9/15/75"

Was

hing

ton

Off

ice

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

alN

atur

e of

Pr

opos

al

(i.e

., La

nd U

se,

Her

bici

de,

etc.

)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

Was

hing

ton

Off

ice

USDA

, Fo

rest

Ser

vice

12

th*S

t., §

Ind

epen

denc

e A

ve.,

Was

hing

ton,

DC

2025

0SW

*Fla

tbea

d W

ild a

nd S

ceni

c Ri

ver

Prop

osal

Flat

head

NF,

Mon

tana

Wild

§ Sc

enic

Ri

ver

Chie

f9/

7310

/75

Flam

ing

Gorg

e N

atio

nal

Recr

eatio

n Ar

ea G

ener

al

Man

agem

ent P

lan

Ash

ley

NF,

Utah

Land

Use

Pla

nit

12/7

56/

76

Salm

on R

iver

Wild

and

Sc

enic

Riv

er P

ropo

sal

Idah

oLe

gisl

atio

n1

it6/

7512

/75

*Teton Corridor Wilderness

Classification

Brid

ger-T

eton

NF

, W

yomi

ngLe

gisl

atio

nti

10/7

54/

76

ALP Co.

1976

-81

5-ye

ar

Cut

ting

Plan

Tongass NF,

Alaska

Land

Use

Pla

nit

11/7

53/

76

Pac

ific

Nor

ther

n Ti

mbe

r G

o.•t

5-ye

ar R

eapp

raisa

l "

10/7

53/

76Lo

ng-te

rm T

imbe

r Sa

le C

ontra

ct

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VOL

. 40

, NO

. 20

7—ER

UÄY;

OCT

OBER

24,

Ì97

5

NOTICES 49977

Was

hing

ton

Off

ice

Cont

inue

doo

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

ai-

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

*Nor

th F

ork

Amer

ican

Rive

r W

ild §

Sce

nic

Taho

e NF

, C

alifo

rnia

Legi

slat

ion

Chie

f

Shee

p M

ount

ain a

nd

Cuca

mong

a W

ilder

ness

Ang

eles

§Sa

n Be

rnar

dino

Wild

erne

ss S

tudy

"

2/77

6/77

Stud

y Ar

eas

NFs,

Cal

iforn

ia

*Lan

d A

cqui

sitio

n fro

m S

outh

ern

Paci

fic

Land

Com

pany

h S

hast

a-Tr

inity

NF

, C

alifo

rnia

Land

Acq

uisi

tion

it

z o -1

Oreg

on D

unes

Sius

law

NF,

Oreg

onW

ilder

ness

Stu

dyti

10/7

411

/75

l J m C/l

^Illi

nois

Riv

er S

tudy

Sisk

iyou

NF,

Oreg

onLe

gisl

atio

nn

10/7

54/

76

Skag

it W

ild a

nd S

ceni

c Ri

ver

Mt.

Bake

r §

Snoq

ualm

ie NF

s, W

ashi

ngto

n

Legi

slat

ion

/

it6/

756/

76

Lowe

r Mina

mW

allow

a-Whit

man

NF,

Oreg

onW

ilder

ness

Stu

dy* it

4/76

6/77

*Nac

hes-

Tiet

on-W

hite

Riv

erM

t. Ba

ker

§Le

gisl

atio

nh

12/7

55/

77Sn

oqua

lmie

NFs,

Was

hing

ton

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 4

0, N

O. 2

07—

FRID

AY,

OCTO

BER

24,

1975

-

i.l

3

Was

hingto

n O

ffice

Con

tinue

d

Title

of

Envi

ronm

ental

St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofA

Prop

osal

Natu

re o

f Pr

opos

al (i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

* Da

te of

Fin

al

Pere

Mar

quett

e N

at’l

Scen

ic Ri

ver

Man

istee

NF,

Mich

igan

Legi

slat

ion

Chie

f2/

7412

/75

Open

Pit

Copp

er an

d Ni

ckel

Mini

ngSu

perio

r NF

, M

inne

sota

,La

nd U

se Pl

antt

1/1/

1/

Tent

ativ

e da

te f

or c

ompl

etion

of

the

draf

t en

viro

nmen

tal s

tate

men

t was

July

1,

1976

. Ho

weve

r, th

is

will

nee

d to

be

rede

term

ined

as

it w

as pr

emise

d on

rec

eipt

of

an o

pera

ting

plan

fro

m IN

CO.

As s

oon

as a

site

-spe

cific

pro

posa

l is

rec

eive

d fro

m IN

CO,

a ne

w re

vise

d sc

hedu

le fo

r co

mpl

etion

of

the

envi

ronm

ental

sta

tem

ent w

ill b

e de

velo

ped.

#

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

71

NOTICES 49979

4

REGIONAL O

FFICE

Missoula,

Mont

ana

Regi

on 1

Title

of E

nvir

onment

al

Statement

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

al

Natu

re o

f Proposal

(i.e

., La

nd Use,

Herbicide^

Responsibl

eOfficial

Date

Draft

Filed w/

CEQ

(or est. d

ate)

Esti

mated

Date

of F

inal

Nort

hern

Region

USDA,

Forest S

ervice

Fede

ral

Building

Missoula,

MT

5980

1

•

*Bitterroot

South

Bitt

erro

ot NF,

Mont

ana

Land

Use

Plan

Forest

Supervisor

8/7

51

2/7

5

Sapphires

itLand

Use Pla

nit

11

/75

5/7

6

*l,ower West

Fork

itLand Use P

lan

ii1

0/7

52

/76

*Warm Spri

ngs-

itLa

nd Use

Plan

n1

1/7

55

/76

Medi

cine

Tree

Little S

leeping

HLand Use

Plan

ii5

/76

—

Child-Rye

/ » /Timber Managem

ent

Plan,

Bitt

erroot

NF

itResour

ce P

lan

Regional

Forester

11

/75

4/7

6

Emer

ald

Creek

St.

Joe NF,

Idaho

Land

Use P

lan

Forest

Supervisor

7/7

51

2/7

5

Siwash

itLa

nd Use

Plan

it1

0/7

5

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7—

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49980 NOTICES

5REGION 1

CONTINUED

Nat

ure

ofT

itle

of E

nviro

nmen

tal

Stat

emen

tLo

catio

nof

Proposal

Prop

osal

(i

.e.t

Land

Use»

H

erbi

cide

s» e

tc.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

Still

man

Poi

ntNe

zper

ce N

F, Id

aho

Land

Use

Pla

nu

5/75

10/7

5Ho

rse C

reek

Adm

ini

stra

tive

Rese

arch

Pr

ojec

t

ItRe

sear

ch P

roje

cttt

8/75

11/7

5

Red

Rive

r• 1

1La

nd U

se P

lan

tt9/

751/

76M

ill C

reek

ttLa

nd U

se P

lan

tt9/

751/

76Ho

t Po

int

-«

IVLa

nd U

se P

lan

tt1/

764/

76Bl

ue R

idge

ttLa

nd U

te Pl

antt

9/76

12/7

6Sl

ate

Cree

ktt

Land

Use

Pla

ntt

11/7

64/

77Cr

ooke

d Cr

eek-

Orog

rand

ett

Land

Use

Pla

n /

it10

/76

1/77

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent

Plan

tt/

Tim

ber

Sale

s an

d Ro

ads

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

1/76

5/76

PEpB

BAl

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, N

O 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49981

6

REGION 1 C

ONTINUED

Title of Environmental

Statement

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

al

Nature of

Proposal

(i.e.,

Land Use,

Herbicides,

etc.)

Responsible

Official

Date Draft

Filed w/CEQ

(or est. d

ate)

Estimate!

Date

of Final

Lakevi

ew,

Kaniksu NF,

Idaho

Land Use Plan

Forest

Supervisor

6/75

11/75

Smith

Creek

»»Land Use Plan

n7/75

12/75

Blacktail

/ .

.

itLand Use Plan

ii10/75

Lamb Upjt

er West Branch

itLand Use Plan

«110/75

Elk River

Clearwater NF,

Idaho

Land Use Plan

ii11/75

2/76

Interim Timbet

Management Plan

iiTimber Manage

ment

Regional

Forester

6/74

10/75

Lowell

iiLand Use Plan

Forest

Supervisor

12/75

5/76

Clearwater-St. J

oe

Divide

Clearwater &

Panhandle NFS,

Idaho

Land Use Plan

/

;

it7/76

11/76

Pryor Mountain Complex

Custer NF,

Montana

Land Use Plan

ti10/75

Beartooth Plateau

Custer,

Gallatin,

Shoshone NFs,

Montana &

Wyoming

Land Use Plan

Forest

Supervisor

Shoshone NF

4/76

7/76

FE

DE

RA

L

RE

GIS

TE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49982 NOTICES

7

REGION 1

CONTINUED

Title

of E

nvir

onme

ntal

Statement

Location

of---P

rnpncfll

Natu

re o

f Proposai

(i

.e.,

Land

Use,

Herbicides,

etc.)

Responsible

Offici

alDate D

raft

Filed w/

CEQ

(oT

P

.fif

. rl

flF

ol

Estimated

Date

of

Final

Sioux District

Custer NF,

Mont

ana

& South

Dakota

Land Use P

lan

Forest

Supervisor

1/76

7/76

Ashl

and

Custer NF,

Mont

ana

Land

Use P

lan

it1/76

6/76

Bearto

oth

Face

Custer,

Gall

atin NPS,

Mont

ana

Land

Use

Plan

Forest

Supervisor

Custer

NF

5/76

2/77

Nort

h End

Deerlodge NF,

Mont

ana

Land

Use P

lan

Forest

Supervisor

6/75

1/76

Basin

tiLand Use Plan

ti7/75

1/76

Skalkaho-E

ast

Fork

itLa

nd U

se P

lan

ii3/76

8/76

Fleecer

IILand U

se P

lan

/Land Use P

lan

it1/76

6/76

Little B

oulder-

Whit

e tail

1»it

6/76

12/76

Anac

onda

-Ham

ilto

n Transmission L

ine

Deerlodge,

Bitterroot,

Lolo N

Fs,,

Mont

ana

Util

ity Tr

ans

missio

n Line

Corridor

Sélection

Forest

Supervisor

Deeflodge NF

3/76

8/76

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49983

8

REGION 1

CONTINUED

Title

of E

nvironmental

Statement

Location

ofPr

opos

al

Natu

re of

Proposal

(i

.e.,

Land Use,

Herbicides,

etc.)

Resp

onsibl

eOfficial

Date Draft

Filed w/CE

Q (or est. d

ate)

Estima

ted

Date

of Final

*Lake

Five

Flat

head

NF,

Mont

ana

Land

Use

Plan

Forest

Supervisor

7/74

10/75

Big Mo

unta

in Master

Plan

nWi

nter

Sports

Site

h5/75

10/75

*Oil a

nd G

as L

ease

Applications

If♦

Oil

and

Gas

Exploration

and

Development

ti6/75

12/75

Island Unit

nLa

nd U

se Plan

h6/75

2/76

Hebg

en L

ake

Gallatin NF,

Mont

ana

Land

Use P

lan

ti12/74

9/75

Ski Yell

owstone

hWi

nter

Sports

/ ii

10/75

5/76

Cedar Bass

ett

iiLand

Use P

lan

h8/73

10/75

West

Half

Yell

owston

eit

Land

Use

Plan

yti

5/76

4/77

Gallatin R

iver

hLand

Use P

lan

it8/77

3/78

Big

Tepee

hTimber S

ale

h2/74

10/75

South

Fork

Swan

Creek

h 1Timber S

ale

h2/74

12/75

Buck

Creek-West

Fork

hRoad C

onstruction

h11/75

3/76

49984 NOTICES

9

REGION 1 CONTINUED

Nature of


Statement

Location

of

i '

Prop

psal

Proposal

(i.e.,

Land Use,

Herbicides,

etc.)

Responsible

Official

Date Draft

Filed w/CEQ

(or est. d

ate)

Estimated

Date

of Final

Elkh

omHelena NF,

Montana

Land Use Plan

Forest

Supervisor

4/74

10/75

Colorado-Unionville-

Travis

99Land Uoe Plan

992/76

11/76

East Belts

ftLand Use Plan

it5/76

2/77

Hike Horse

99Land Use Plan

h1/76

10/76

Magpie C

onfederate

Land Use Plan

tl5/76

3/77

Ophir-Dog-MacDonald Pass

HLand Use Plan

9911/75

8/76

Nevada-Stemple-Little

Prickly Pear

IILand Use Plan

ii10/77

9/78

*Callahan

Kootenai NF,

Montana

Land Use Plan

/

ti7/74

10/75

*West Kootenai

Hf

Land Use Plan

h9/75

2/76

*Cross Mountain

t*Land Use Plan

IIId

175

3/76

*0,Brien

MLand Use Plan

ii10/75

3/76

*Seventeenmile

WLand Use Plan

•110/75

3/76

*Dickey-Sunday

«1Land Use Plan

1«8/75

12/75

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R24

, 19

75

NOTrCES 49985

REGION 1 CONTINUED

10

Title of E

nvironmental

Statement

Location

o£Proposal"

Nature of

Proposal

(i.e.,

Land Use,

Herbicides,

etc.)

Responsible

Official

Date Draft

Filed W'/CEQ

(or est. d

ate)

Estimated

Date

of Final

Big

Swede

Kootenai NF,

Montana

Lànd Use Plan

Forest

Supervisor

11/75

5/76

*Pipe

»!Land Use Plan

ii11/75

5/76

*Keeler

IfLand Use Plan

h12/75

6/76

Rocky Mountain Front

Lewis

& Clark

NF,

Montana

Land Use Plan

n11/75

8/76

Smith River

uLand Use Plan

h3/76

6/76

Yogo-Bear Park

itLand Use Plan

h6/76

10/76

Logging-Pilgrim

VfLand Use Plan

h9/76

11/77

*Ward-Eagle

Lolo NF,

Montana

Land Use Plan

It. 1

/7/74

10/75

*Petty Mountain

hLand Use P^an

h7/75

1/76

' Placid-Blanchard

. h

Land Use Plan

h11/75

4/76

*North Cutoff-Kennedy

hLand Use Plan

ii12/75

7/76

*Ninemile

hLand Use Plan

it12/75

7/76

*Big Hole

tiLand Use Plan

h1/76

8/76

*Prospect Creek

hLand Use Plan

h2/76

9/76

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49986 NOTICES

11

REGI

ONAL

OFF

ICE

Denv

er,

Colo

rado

Regi

on 2

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

lLo

catio

nN

atur

e of

Resp

onsib

leDa

te D

raft

Estim

ated

Stat

emen

tof

Prop

osal

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Off

icia

lFi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Date

of F

inal

Rock

y M

ount

ain R

egio

n US

DA,

Fore

st S

ervi

ce

1117

7 W

est E

ight

h Av

enue

P.

0.

Box

2512

7 De

nver

, Co

lora

do

8022

5

Snak

e Ri

ver

Uni

tAr

apah

o NF

, Co

lora

doLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

11/7

54/

76

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent

Blac

k H

ills

NF,

Sout

h Da

kota

§ W

yomi

ng •

Reso

urce

Pla

nRe

gion

alFo

rest

er\

2/76

6/76

*Eas

t Ri

ver

Gunn

ison

§W

hite

Rive

r NF

s, Co

lora

doLa

nd U

se P

lan

/

Fore

stSu

perv

isors

11/7

54/

76

* Gran

d M

esa-M

uddy

Cre

ekGu

nniso

n §

Gran

d M

esa

NFs,

Colo

rado

Land

Use

Pla

ntt

Def

erre

d-pe

ndin

g US

DI

deci

sion

gro

wing

out

Si

erra

Clu

b, e

t. al

.,Ro

gers

C. B

. M

orto

n et

. al

., C.

A. #

1182

-73

C.A.

D.C.

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49987

12

REGI

ON 2

CON

TINUE

D

lit Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

lSt

atem

ent

^Lo

catio

n N

atur

e of

of

Pr

opos

ai

Prop

osai

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

*Sav

age

Run

Med

icine

Bow

NF,

Wyo

ming

Land

Use

Pla

nFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r11

/75

2/76

Ryan

Par

kt»

Win

ter

Spor

tsh

11/7

52/

76

^Sou

ther

n Sa

n Ju

anRi

o Gr

ande

§

San

Juan

NFs

* Co

lora

do

Carso

n NF

, Ne

w M

exico

Land

Use

Pla

nh

Def

erre

d -

pend

ing

coor

dina

tion

with

P.

L.. 9

3-62

1 Re

port

*Sou

th F

ork

(incl

udes

Wol

f Cr.

Ski A

rea)

Rio

Gran

de N

F, Co

lora

doLa

nd U

se P

lan

M12

/75

4/76

*Bea

rs Ea

rs U

nit

Rout

t NF,

Colo

rado

. La

nd U

se P

lan

It2/

766/

76

*Bla

ckta

iltt

Lahd

Use

Pla

nII

11/7

52/

76

*Mou

nt W

elba

itLa

nd U

se P

lan

II11

/75

2/76

^Dol

ores

(incl

udes

Sto

rm. P

eak)

San

Juan

NF,

Colo

rado

Land

Use

Pla

nIt

Def

erre

d -

pend

ing

coor

dina

tion

with

P.

L. 9

3-62

1 Re

port

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R, *

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49988 NOTICES

13

REGI

ON 2

CON

TINUE

D

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

Nat

ure

of

^ of

Pr

opos

al

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

*Firs

t Fo

rkSa

n Ju

an N

F, Co

lora

doLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

Def

erre

d -

pend

ing

coor

dina

tion

with

P.

L. 9

3-62

1 Re

port

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent

hRe

sour

ce P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

5/75

10/7

5

Bear

toot

h Pl

atea

u U

nit

(w/R

egio

n 1)

(F

orm

erly

Be

arto

oth

High

way)

Shos

hone

, G

alla

tin,

§ Cu

ster

NFs,

Mon

tana

§ W

yomi

ng

Land

Use

Pla

nFo

rest

Supe

rviso

rs ,

4/76

9/76

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent

V Sh

osho

ne N

F, W

yomi

ngRe

sour

ce P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

6/75

10/7

5

^Tho

mpso

n Cr

eek

Uni

tW

hite

Rive

r NF

, Co

lora

doLa

nd U

se P

lan

Land

Use

Pla

n

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

11/7

54/

76

*Upp

er Ea

gle

Uni

tit

ttD

efer

red-

pend

ing

reso

lutio

n of

Bea

ver

Cree

k Ev

alua

tion

Mar

ble

Win

ter

Spor

tstt

Win

ter

Spor

tstt

4/73

11/7

5

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent

MRe

sour

ce P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

10/7

52/

76

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49989

REGI

ONAL

OFF

ICE

Albu

quer

que,

New

Mex

icoRe

gion

3

Title

of

Envi

ronm

ental

St

atem

ent

* Lo

catio

n of

Prop

osal

Natu

re o

f ; P

ropo

sal

(i.e

., La

nd U

se,

Her

bici

de,

etc.

)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Date

of F

inal

Sout

hwes

tern

Regio

n US

DA,

Fore

st Se

rvic

e 51

7 Go

ld Av

enue

, SW

Al

buqu

erqu

e, Ne

w M

exico

8710

2

Adde

ndum

to

Fina

l En

viro

nmen

tal S

tatem

ent

Apac

he-

Sitg

reav

es N

F, Ar

izona

Her

bici

deFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r9/

76

Blac

k Ri

ver

iiLa

nd U

se Pl

anll'

12/7

56/

76

Timb

er M

anag

emen

t Plan

iiRe

sour

ce P

lanRe

gion

alFo

reste

r11

/75

5/76

Off-R

oad

Veh

icle

Carso

n NF

, Ne

w M

exico

Land

Use

Plan

/

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

3/76

12/7

6

Red

Rive

r Sk

i Are

a Ex

pans

ion

iiW

inter

Spo

rtsRe

gion

alFo

reste

r2/

767/

76

Taos

Ski

Val

ley

Expa

nsio

nii

Win

ter S

ports

h4/

7412

/75

Man

zano

Mou

ntain

Cibo

la NF

, Ne

w M

exico

Land

Use

Plan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

12/7

53/

76

Oak

Cree

kCo

conin

o NF

, Ar

izona

»

Land

Use

Plan

ti11

/75

3/76

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

,N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

.

NOTICES

15

REGI

ON 3

CON

TINUE

D

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

al

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

etbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

Woo

ds C

anyo

nCo

coni

no N

F, A

rizon

a, L

and

Use

Plan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

9/75

11/7

5

Anam

ax L

and

Exch

ange

Coro

nado

NF,

Ariz

ona

,La

nd E

xcha

nge

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

1/77

4/77

Huac

huca

trLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

3/76

9/76

Off-R

oad

Veh

icle

itLa

nd U

se P

lan

it2/

766/

76Sa

nta

Cat

alin

ait

Land

Use

Pla

n1»

3/75

11/7

5Sw

ift T

rail

itRo

ad C

onstr

.Re

gion

alFo

rest

er9/

751Ä

/75

Gili

ta U

nit

Plan

1

Gila

NF,

New

Mex

ico• |

* V :

Wm11

• | /:• ,;

|La

nd U

se P

lan

/

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

12/7

54/

76

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent P

lan

ft^R

esou

rce P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

12/7

54/

76

So.

Kaib

ab T

imbe

r Pl

anKa

ibab

NF,

Ariz

ona

Reso

urce

Pla

nit

1/76

6/76

Will

iam

s La

nd U

seit

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

,

Land

Use

Pla

n Fo

rest

Supe

rviso

r

VOL.

40,

NO.

207

—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

10/7

54/

76

NOTICES 49991

REGI

ON 3

CON

TINUE

D

16

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

*

Loca

tion

Nat

ure

of

of

Prop

osai

Pr

opos

ai

(i.e

., La

nd U

se,

Her

bici

de,

etc.

)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

Eagl

e Cr

eek

Dam

§ R

eser

voir

Linc

oln

NF,

New

Mex

icoLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

3/76

7/76

Ruid

oso

itLa

nd U

se P

lan

it10

/76

2/77

So.

Guad

alupe

hLa

nd U

se P

lan

ti10

/75

2/76

Phel

ps D

odge

Lan

d Ex

chan

gePr

esco

tt NF

, A

rizon

aLa

nd E

xcha

nge

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

8/76

12/7

6

Supp

lem

enta

l D

raft

to

Clar

kdal

e-W

illia

ms

High

way

#279

ttRo

ad C

onstr

.it

8/75

6/76

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent P

lan

hRe

sour

ce P

lan

ti11

/75

3/76

Gal

lina

Uni

tSa

nta

Fe N

F, Ne

w M

exico

Land

Use

Pla

nFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r1/

767/

76

Peco

stt

^dnd

Use

Pla

nit

1/76

6/76

Off-R

oad

Veh

icle

hLa

nd U

se P

lan

tt7/

7612

/76

Mog

ollo

n Ri

mTo

nto,

Apa

che-

Si

tgre

aves

§

Coco

nino

NFs

, A

rizon

a

Land

Use

Pla

nRe

gion

alFo

rest

er1/

759/

75

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7—

-FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49992 NOTICES

17RE

GION

AL OFFIC

E Ogden, U

tah

Region 4

■Title

of Environmental

■ Statement

* Location

ofProposal

Nature of

Proposal

(i.e.,

Land Use,

Herbicide, e

tc.)

Responsible

Official

Date Draft

Filed w/CEQ

(or est. d

ate)

Estimated

Date

of Final

Intermountain Region

USDA,

Forest Service

324725th Street

r„. Ogdèn, U

tah

844Ò1

;

Timber Management:

Ashley NF,

Utah

Resource Plan

Regional

Forester

6/76

12/76

Long Park Reservoir

ItReservoir

Construction

Forest

Supervisor

12/75

6/76

High Uintas

South Slope

VILand Use Plan

II6/76

12/76

♦Middle Fork Boise

Planning Unit

Boise NF,

Idaho

Land Use Plan

•I6/75

9/75

♦Garden Valley Planning Unit

V It

liand

Use Plan

II5/75

9/75

♦Squaw Creek

HLand Use Plan

•V6/75

9/75

♦Cascade P

lanning UNit

VILand Use Plan

II5/75

9/75

♦Big Piney

Bridger-Teton

NF, Wyoming

Land Use Plan

II5/75

9/75

♦West Slope of Wind

River

Mountains

Planning UNit

IILand Use Plan

II5/76

9/76

VFE

DERA

L RE

GIST

ER,

VOL.

40,

NO.

207—

FRID

AY,

OCTO

BER

24,

1975

NOTICES 49993

18

REGION 4 CONTINUED

Title

of

Envi

ronm

ental

St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

* of

Pr

opos

alNa

ture

of

Prop

osal

(i.e

., La

nd U

se,

Her

bici

de,

etc.

)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

atec

Date

of F

inal

♦union Pass

Planning UNit

Bridger-Teton

NF, Wyoming

Land Use Plan

Forest

Supervisor

9/75

12/75

♦Greys-Salt River Unit

1«Land Use Plan

If.10/75

2/76

♦Timber Management Plan

• t X

Resource P

lan

Regional

Forester

3/76

6/76

Bear River

Caribou NF,

Idaho

Land Use Plan

Forest

Supervisor

5/76

8/76

♦Pioneer Mountains

Challis

& Sawtooth NFs,

Idaho

Land Use Plan

If*6/75

1/76

Challis-Squaw Creek

Challis NF,

Idaho

Land Use P

lan

/

9«10/76

4/77

♦Markagunt Plateau

Dixie NF,

Utah

Tiand Use Plan

VI11/75

1/76

* Pauns au

gun t

-Sevier

«1Land Use Plan

•f1/76

5/76

♦Timber Management

««Resource Plan

Regional,

Forester

8/75

11/75

♦Salina Unit

Fishlake NF,

Utah

Land Use Plan

Forest

'Supervisor

10/75

2/76

FE

DE

RA

L

RE

GIS

TE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49994 NOTICES

19REGION 4

CONTINUED


Statement

Location

Nature of

of

Proposal

Proposal

(i.e., L

and Use,

* Herbicide,

etc.)

Responsible

Official

J.

>

Date D

raft

Filed w/CEQ

(or est. d

ate)

Estimated

Date

of Final

*Mt. M

oriah

Humboldt NF,

Nevada

Land Use

Plan

Forest

Supervisor

10/75

2/76

*Santa Rosa

9«Land Use

Plan

99

,3/76

6/76

♦Monticello

Manti-LaSal

NF,

Utah

Land Use

Plan

998/75

11/75

♦Moab Planning UNit

Manti-LaSal

NF,

Utah & Colorado

Land Use

Plan

912/76

6/76

♦Council P

lanning Unit

Payette NF,

Idaho

Land Use

Plan

199/75

1/76

♦McCall

Planning Unit

««Land Use

Plan

If1/76

*//76

♦Meadows P

lanning Unit

IfLand Use

Plan

9911/75

2/76

Payette Timber Plan

«9Resource

Plan

Regional

Forester

6/75

9/75

Boulder Planning Unit

9VLand Use

Plan

Forest

Supervisor

12/76

3/77

♦Beartrap-Dutchler

Salmon NF,

Idaho

Land Use

Plan

999/75

1/76

♦Twelvemile Planning UNit

99Land Use

Plan

9910/75

3/76

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49995

20

REGI

ON 4

CON

TINUE

D

Title

of

Envi

ronm

ental

St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

alNa

ture

of

Prop

osal

(i.e

., La

nd U

se,

Her

bici

de,

etc.

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Date

of F

inal

*Moo

se Cr

eek

Basin

Salm

on N

F, Id

aho

Land

Use

Plan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

4/75

9/75

Bigw

ood

Ski A

rea . r

Sawt

ooth

NF,

Idah

oW

inter

Spo

rtsit

9/74

6/76

*Blac

k Pi

ne-V

iLa

nd U

se Pl

anti

5/75

10/7

5*A

lbio

n Pl

anni

ng U

nit

itLa

nd U

se Pl

anit

14/

7612

/76

*West

Slo

pe T

etons

Uni

tTa

rghe

e NF

, Id

aho

Land

Use

Plan

ti9/

7512

/75

^Isla

nd P

ark

itLa

nd U

se Pl

an1/

765/

76*B

ig Ho

le M

ounta

insit

I and

Use

Plan

■ r i ■ 'i

■ h

6/76

10/7

6^C

entra

l Ne

vada

Toiy

abe

NF,

Neva

daLa

nd U

se Pl

an

v I

h3/

7510

/75

*Mt.

Char

lesto

nit

Land

Use

Plan

h12

/75

6/76

*Fou

r Se

ason

s Sk

i Are

aU

inta

NF,

Utah

Win

ter S

ports

h12

/75

6/76

Stra

wber

ry P

lanni

ng U

nit

itLa

nd U

se Pl

anit

2/76

7/76

*Lon

e Pe

akW

asatc

h §

Uin

ta N

Fs,

Utah

New

Wild

erne

ss

Stud

y Ar

eaRe

gion

alFo

reste

r' 7

/75

■10

/75

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

1

21

REGI

ON 4

CON

TINUE

D

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

al•

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

'.Da

te of

Fin

al

*Nor

th S

lope

of

the

High

U

inta

sW

asatc

h NF

, Ut

ahLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

10/7

S3/

76

j

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 49997

22

REGI

ONAL

OFF

ICE

San

Fran

cisc

o, C

alifo

rnia

Regio

n 5

.6

Title

of

Envi

ronm

ental

St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

alNa

ture

of

Prop

osal

(i.e

., La

nd U

se,

Her

bici

de,

etc.

)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Date

of F

inal

Cal

iforn

ia R

egion

US

DA,

Fore

st Se

rvic

e 63

0 Sa

nson

e St

reet

Sa

n Fr

anci

sco,

Cal

iforn

ia94

111

*San

Gab

riel

Ange

les N

F,La

nd U

se Pl

anFo

rest

3/76

9/76

Calif

orni

aSu

perv

isor

■* '

^Vale

ncia

i»La

nd U

se Pl

ani»

\ 6/

7712

/77

*Palo

mar M

ounta

in Un

itCl

evela

nd N

F,La

nd U

se Pl

anh

2/75

10/7

5Ca

lifor

nia

*Trab

uco

Dis

trict

Uni

tM

Land

Use

Plan

V "4/

7612

/76

^Des

cans

o 1/

1»ha

nd U

se P

lan

/h

1/78

6/78

*Sho

tgun

-Blac

k M

ount

ain U

nit

I»La

nd U

se Pl

anh

1/79

6/79

Vol

cano

ville

Eldo

rado

NF,

Land

Use

Plan

it10

/75

1/76

1/

The

Desc

anso

Uni

t was

for

mer

ly l

iste

d ¡as

Jap

atul

, El

Cap

itan,

Lagu

na-M

oren

a U

nits

.

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

49998 NOTICES

23

REGION 5 C

ONTINUED

Title

of Environmental

Location

Nature o

fResponsible

Date D

raft

Estimated

Stat

emen

tof

Proposal

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Official

Filed w/CE

Q (or est. d

ate)

Date

of F

inal

*Almanor Pla

nnin

g Unit

Lass

en N

.F.,

Cali

fornia

Land U

se Plan,

Forest

Supervisor

2/76

7/76

Big

Sur

Coa

stal

,Lo

s Pa

dres

NF,

Land

Use

. Pla

n C

alifo

rnia

tt12

/7S

3/76

*Mt.

Pino

sm

Land

Use

Pla

nit

12/7

63/

77^M

ammo

th Pl

anni

ng U

nit

Inyo

NF,

Cal

iforn

iaLa

nd U

se P

lan

it12

/75

%5/

76

Mono

Bas

intt

Land

Use

Pla

n» t

i11

/76

3/77

Bish

op C

reek

* iiLa

nd U

se P

lan

it11

/75

4/76

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent

iiRe

sour

ce P

lan /

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

6/76

10/7

6

*King

Pla

nnin

g U

nit

Klam

ath N

F, C

alifo

rnia

Land

Use

Pla

nFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r11

/75

3/76

*Grid

er P

lann

ing

Uni

tit

Land

Use

Pla

nii

12/7

56/

76M

edici

ne L

ake

Mod

oc N

F, C

alifo

rnia

Land

Use

Pla

ntt

6/76

9/76

War

ner M

ount

ainit

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

,

Land

Use

Pla

n

VOL.

40,

NO.

207—

FRID

AY,

it

OCTO

BER

24,

1975

12/7

75/

78

NOTICES 49999

24V

REGI

ON 5

CON

TINUE

D

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

al

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

*Moh

awk

Plan

ning

Uni

tPl

umas

NF,

Cal

iforn

ia..L

and

Use

Plan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

11/7

55/

76

Tim

ber M

anag

emen

tIt

Reso

urce

Pla

nRe

gion

alFo

rest

er2/

7510

/76

Feat

her

Rive

rIt

Land

Use

Pla

nFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r9/

769/

77

*Upp

er T

rini

tySh

asta

-Trin

ity

NF,

Cal

iforn

iaLa

nd U

se P

lan

it11

/74

11/7

5

*Mt.

Shas

tait

Land

Use

Pla

nit

12/7

66/

77

*NRA

Pla

nnin

g U

nit

nLa

nd U

se P

lan

8/75

3/76

*Gira

rd-M

cClo

udit

Land

Use

Pla

nit

7/76

12/7

6

*Sou

th F

ork

Mou

ntain

itLr

ind U

se P

lan

it2/

767/

76

Ranc

heria

Sier

ra N

F, C

alifo

rnia

Land

Use

Pla

nit

10/7

512

/75

*Kin

gs R

iver

hLa

nd U

se P

lan

it5/

7611

/76

*Pin

erid

ge-K

aise

rH

Land

Use

Pla

nft

5/76

11/7

6

/

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7—

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

50000 NOTICES

25

REGI

ON5

CONT

INUE

D

6

Title

of

Envi

ronm

ental

St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

Natu

re o

f of

Pr

opos

al Pr

opos

al (i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

. Res

pons

ible

Off

icia

lDa

te D

raft

File

d w/

CEQ

(or

est.

date

)Es

timate

d Da

te of

Fin

al

*Chi

quito

-Bas

s La

keSi

erra

NF,

Cal

iforn

iaLa

nd U

se Pl

anFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r5/

7611

/76

*Mari

posa

»1La

nd U

se P

lan

M5/

7611

/76

Timb

er M

anag

emen

tit

Reso

urce

Plan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

7/76

12/7

6

Sisk

iyou

Plan

ning

un

itSi

x Ri

vers

NF,

Cal

iforn

iaLa

nd U

se Pl

anFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r1/

775/

77

Min

eral

King

Sequ

oia

NF,

Cal

iforn

iaRe

crea

tion

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

12/7

41/

76

Litt

le K

em»1

Land

Use

Plan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

2/76

7/76

Tim

ber M

anag

emen

tI!

Reso

urce

Plan

/ /

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

9/76

2/77

^Midd

le Ee

lM

endo

cino

NF,

Cal

iforn

iaLa

nd U

se P

lanfo

rest

Supe

rviso

r10

/75

3/76

Timb

er M

anag

emen

tit

Reso

urce

Pla

nRe

gion

alFo

reste

r12

/75

8/76

*Tru

ckee

-Litt

le T

ruck

ee R

iver

Taho

e NF

, C

alifo

rnia

and

To

iyab

e NF

, Ne

vada

Land

Use

Plan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

12/7

55/

76

■ \

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 50001

26

REGI

ON 5

CON

TINUE

D

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

*

Loca

tion

Nat

ure

of

of

Prop

osal

Pr

opos

al

(i.e

., La

nd U

se,

Her

bici

de,

etc.

)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

*For

esth

ill-H

ell

Hole

Taho

e §

Eldo

rado

NFs

, C

alifo

rnia

Land

Use

Pla

n *

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

3/77

9/77

Tim

ber M

anag

emen

tTa

hoe

NF,

Cal

iforn

iaRe

sour

ce P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

6/76

11/7

6

*Nev

ada

City

mLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

6/77

12/7

7

Dow

niev

ille

Taho

e §

Plum

as N

Fs,

Cal

iforn

ia

Land

Use

Pla

nn

6/78

12/7

8

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent

Ang

eles

, Re

sour

ce P

ian

Clev

elan

d,Lo

s Pa

dres

§Sa

n Be

rnar

dino

NFs

,C

alifo

rnia

/ i

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

2/76

9/76

Big

Bear

Bas

inSa

n Be

rnar

dino

NF

, C

alifo

rnia

Land

Use

Pla

nFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r11

/75

2/76

^Pro

pose

d G

ener

al

Man

agem

ent P

lan

of N

F La

nds

in L

ake

Taho

e Ba

sin

Lake

Tah

oe

Land

Use

Pla

n Ba

sin M

gt.U

nit,

Cal

iforn

ia §

Neva

da

Lake

Tah

oe

Basin

Ad

m.8/

73%

12/7

5

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

50002 NOTICES

27

REGI

ON 5

CON

TINUE

D

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

4

Loca

tion

Nat

ure

of

Resp

onsib

le

Date

Dra

ft Es

timat

ed

% of

Pr

opos

al

Off

icia

l Fi

led

w/CE

Q Da

te Pr

opos

al

(i.e

., La

nd U

se,

(or

est.

date

) of

Fin

al

Her

bici

de,

etc.

)

*Sie

rra-

Paci

fic P

ower

line,

Bu

ckey

e to

Rou

nd H

illLa

ke T

ahoe

Tr

ansm

issio

n Re

gion

al

10/7

5 2/

76

Basin

Mgt.

Li

ne

Fore

ster

s U

nit

6 To

iyab

e (R

-4 §

R-5

)NF

, Ne

vada

Vol

cano

ville

Pla

nnin

g U

nit

Eldo

rado

NF,

Land

Use

Pla

n Fo

rest

10

/75

1/76

C

alifo

rnia

Su

perv

isor

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 50003

I

28

REGI

ONAL

OFF

ICE

- Po

rtlan

d, O

rego

n

Regi

on 6

*T

itle

of E

nviro

nmen

tal

Stat

emen

tLo

catio

n N

atur

e of

of

Pr

opos

al

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q |o

r es

t. da

te}

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

Paci

fic N

orth

wes

t Re

gion

US

DA,

Fore

st S

ervi

ce

319

SW P

ine

Stre

et

Portl

and,

yOreg

on

9720

8S.

' jf\1

East

Deer

Cre

ekC

olvi

lle N

F, W

ashi

ngto

nLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

9/7S

1/76

*Har

vey

Cree

kn

Land

Use

Pla

n1»

11/7

55/

76

Ket

tle C

rest

itLa

nd U

se P

lan

it11

/75

5/76

*Des

chut

es L

and

Use

Des

chut

es N

F, Or

egon

Land

Use

Pla

n■

m1/

777/

77

Frem

ont 1

0 ye

ar T

imbe

r Pl

anFr

emon

t NF,

Oreg

onRe

sour

ce P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

12/7

56/

76

Coffe

epot

Res

ervo

irM

Dam

Cons

truct

ion

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

11/7

52/

76

*Lak

eview

ttLa

nd U

se P

lan

•i12

/75

5/76

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VG

L.

40

, M

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BA

R

34

, 1

97

5

NOTICES

REGI

ON 6

CON

TINUE

D29

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

al*

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Date

of F

inal

*Cle

ar C

reek

Giff

ord

Pinc

hot

Land

Use

Pla

n NF

, W

ashi

ngto

nFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r1/

7511

/75

*Upp

er Le

wis

Uni

t Pl

an»?

Land

Use

Pla

nm .

10/7

54/

76*B

ear

Cree

k».

1La

nd U

se P

lan

it11

/75

5/76

*Joh

n Da

y Pl

anni

ng U

nit

Malh

eur

NF,

Oreg

onLa

nd U

se P

lan

tt11

/75

5/76

* Sou

th p

ork

Plan

ning

Uni

t»»

Land

Use

Pla

nit

1/76

8/76

*Silv

ies »

-Malh

eur

MLa

nd U

se P

lan

tt6/

7612

/76

Bren

Mac;

Mine

sM

t. Ba

ker,

Snoq

ualm

ie NF

s, W

ashi

ngto

n

Acce

ss R

oad

§ M

inin

gtt

9/76

3/77

*Mt.

Bake

r Pl

anni

ng U

nit

itLa

nd U

se P

lan

// f ¿and

Use

Pla

n

tt1/

767/

76*B

ull

Run

Mt.

Hood

NF,

Oreg

ontt

11/7

56/

76*M

t. Ho

od P

lann

ing

Uni

tfl

Land

Use

Pla

ntt

12/7

57/

76Ti

mbe

rline

Lod

geft

Man

agem

ent

Dire

ctio

ntt

9/74

11/7

5

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 50005

REG

ION

6 CO

NTIN

UED

30

itle

of E

nviro

nmen

tal

State

men

tLo

catio

nof

Prop

osal

*

Natu

re o

f Pr

opos

al (i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CEQ

(o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

/Da

teof

Fin

al

Timb

er M

anag

emen

tM

t. Ho

od N

F, Or

egon

Reso

urce

Plan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

1/76

8/76

Timb

er M

anag

emen

t 10

year

Pl

anOc

hoco

NF,

Oreg

onRe

sour

ce P

lanh

1/76

7/76

*0ch

oco

Plan

ning

Uni

tit

Land

Use

Plan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

6/76

11/76

*Croo

ked

Rive

rM

Land

Use

Plan

M12

/764/7

7

*Gra

sslan

ds P

lanni

ng U

nit

MLa

nd U

se Pl

anit

12/76

4/77

*Twi

sp -W

inthr

op C

onco

nully

Okan

ogan

NF,

Was

hingto

nLa

nd U

se Pl

an10

/756/7

6

Olym

pic O

RV P

lanOl

ympic

NF,

Was

hingto

nOf

f Ro

ad V

ehicl

e Re

gulat

ions

h12

/752/7

6

*Qui

naul

t Uni

th

AIf

ina U

se Pl

anti

12/75

7/76

*Mt.

Butle

r-Dry

Cree

kSi

skiy

ou N

F, Or

egon

Land

Use

Plan

h1/7

51/7

6

*Rog

ue-Il

linoi

sh

Land

Use

Plan

h3/7

612

/76

Chetc

o-Gr

ayba

ckh

Land

Use

Plan

h5/7

62/7

7

Coqu

ille

hLa

nd U

se Pl

anh

1/78

12/78

Oreg

on D

unes

NRA

Sius

law N

F,M

anag

emen

t Plan

h9/7

411

/75Or

egon

•

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

. 1

97

5

50006 NOTICES

31REGION 6

CO

NT

INU

ED


Statement

Location

ofProposal

*

Nature of

Proposal

(i.e.,

Land Use,

Herbicide, e

tc.)

Responsible

Official

Date Draft

Filed

w/CEQ

(or est. d

ate)

Estimated

Date

of Final

*Marys Peak

Siuslaw NF,

Oregon

Management Plan

Forest

Supervisor

12/75

5/76

*Hebo Planning Unit

»1Management Plan

it4/76

10/76

^Cascade Head Scenic Research Area "

Management Plan

ft2/76

8/76

^Timber Management Plan

rtResource Plan

it1/76

7/76

*0regon Buf

cteUmatilla NF,

Washington

Management Plan

If11/75

3/76

*Elgin

»»Management Plan

it12/75

4/76

*Dumont, Q

uartz,

Last Creek

Umpqua NF,

Oregon

Ròadless Area

it12/75

7/76

*Fairview, P

uddin Rock,

Canton-Steelhead

»».Roadless Area

/ Resource Plan

M12/75

7/76

Timber Management

ItRegional

Forester

1/76

7/76

*Wallowa Valley

Wallowa-Whitman

NF, Oregon

Land Use Plan

Forest

Supervisor

6/75

11/76

*Grande Ronde

VfLand Use Plan

it3/76

6/77

*Chelan

Wenatchee §

Mt.

Baker-

Snoqua.lmie NFs,

Washington

Land Allocation

4

Regional

9/75

1/76

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 50007

32RE

GION

6 C

ONTIN

UED

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

al<*

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

* Da

teof

Fin

al

Spru

ce B

udwo

rm C

ontro

lW

enatc

hee

§ Ok

anog

an N

Fs,

Was

hing

ton

Cont

rol

Proj

ect

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

12/7

5«

4/76

*Che

mul

t Uni

tW

inema

NF,

Oreg

onLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

9/75

2/76

^Will

amet

te P

lan

Will

amet

te N

F, Or

egon

Land

Use

Pla

n-

Reso

urce

Pla

nRe

gion

alFo

rest

er7/

7512

/75

Brei

tenb

ush

Geot

herm

al De

velo

pmen

tti

Reso

urce

Pla

nFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r10

/75

2/76

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 4

0, N

O. 2

07—

FRID

AY,

OCTO

BER

24,

1975

50008 NOTICES

REGI

ONAL

OFF

ICE

Atla

nta,

Geo

rgia

33

Regi

on 8

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

* Lo

catio

n of

Prop

osal

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

Sout

hern

Reg

ion

USDA

, Fo

rest

Ser

vice

17

20 P

each

tree

Road

, NW

A

tlant

a, G

eorg

ia

3030

9

Bank

head

Tim

ber

Mgt.

Pla

nBa

nkhe

ad N

F, Al

abam

aRe

sour

ce P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

1/76

4/76

Cone

cuh

Uni

tCo

necu

h NF

, Al

abam

aLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

10/7

51/

76

Dugg

er M

ount

ain U

nit

Talla

dega

NF,

Alab

ama

'Land

Use

Pla

nI

f12

/75

3/76

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent P

lan

. 1»

Reso

urce

Pla

n

/NF

, La

nd U

se P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

7/75

10/7

6

Chat

toog

a Ri

ver

Uni

tCh

atta

hooc

hee

Geo

rgia

Forest

Supervisor

2/75

9/75

Lake

Rus

sell

rtLa

nd U

se P

lan

*• *

12/75

6/76

Sout

h Sl

ope

MLa

nd U

se P

lan

ft'2/76

7/76

FEDI

RAI.

REGI

STER

, VQ

i. 40

, NO

. 20

7—»F

RtDA

y, OC

fOBf

tt J4

, .10

7S ’

g

NOTICES

REGI

ON 8

CON

TINUE

D34

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

Nat

ure

of

of

Prop

osal

Pr

opos

al

(i.e

., La

nd U

se,

* He

rb ic

ide,

etc

.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

• Da

teof

Fin

al

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent P

lan

Cher

okee

NF,

Tenn

esse

eRe

sour

ce P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

10/7

53/

76

Unka

Uni

t1»

Land

Use

Plai

nFo

rest

Su

perv

isor -

11/7

53/

76

Laur

el R

iver

Uni

t M

anag

emen

t Pla

nD

anie

l Bo

one

NF,

Kent

ucky

Land

Use

Pla

nit

10/7

54/

76

Lick

ing

Rive

r U

nit

nM

anag

emen

t Pl

anIt

6/76

12/7

6

Big

Scru

bO

cala

NF,

Flor

ida

Land

Use

Pla

nII

11/7

5< 5

/76

Long

leaf

Uni

tit

Land

Use

Pla

nII

12/7

411

/75

Chau

ga U

nit

Fran

cis

Mar

ion

§ Su

mter

NFs

, So

uth

Caro

lina

Land

Use

Pla

n

/

'/

II8/

7411

/75

Laur

el F

ork

Uni

tGe

o. W

ashi

ngto

n NF

, V

irgin

iaLa

nd U

se P

lan

II2/

746/

76

Mas

sanu

tten

Uni

tii

Land

Use

Pla

nII

11/7

56/

76

Lowe

r Jac

kson

Uni

t sit

Land

Use

Pla

nIt

6/76

12/7

6

.

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

50010 NOTICES

35RE

GION

g CON

TINU

ED

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

ai■ *

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osai

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

’ Da

teof

Fin

al

*Cav

e M

ount

ain L

ake

Jeff

erso

n NF

, V

irgin

iaLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

2/74

11/7

5

Mt.

Roge

rs NR

A.

tiLa

nd U

se P

lan

tt11

/75

7/76

High

Kno

b U

nit

uLa

nd U

se P

lan

tt1/

769/

76Re

vise

d 10

yea

r Ti

mbe

r M

anag

emen

t Pla

ntt

Reso

urce

Pla

nRe

gion

alFo

rest

er12

/76

7/76

Nor

th C

atah

oula

- So

uth

Winn

Uni

tK

isat

chie

NF,

Loui

siana

Land

Use

Pla

nFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r10

/75

4/76

Cane

y Pl

anni

ng U

nit

»tLa

nd U

se P

lan

tt12

/75

5/76

Vern

on U

nit

ttLa

nd U

se P

lan

tt1/

766/

76D

elta

Uni

tD

elta

NF,

Mis

siss

ippi

Land

Use

Pla

n

/ Land

Use

Pla

n

tt8/

7512

/75

Porte

r Cr

eek

Uni

tHo

moc

hitto

NF,

Mis

siss

ippi

: tt

10/7

52/

76

Brus

hy C

reek

Uni

th

Land

Use

Pla

ntt

10/7

5•

2/76

Tim

ber M

anag

emen

t Pla

ntt

Reso

urce

Pla

ntt

10/7

51/

76

FEDI

RAI.

REGI

STER

, VO

I. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 50011

REGI

ON a

CONT

INUE

D36

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

Nat

ure

of

of

Prop

osai

Pr

opos

ai

fi.e

., La

nd U

se,

* H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

.Da

teof

Fin

al

Tim

ber M

anag

emen

t Pla

nB

ienv

ille

NF,

Mis

siss

ippi

Reso

urce

Pla

nFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r10

/75

1/76

Nan

taha

la U

nit

Nat

’1 F

ores

ts

in N

o. Ca

rolin

aLa

nd U

se P

lan

»»8/

7512

/75

Cur

tis C

reek

Uni

tII

Land

Use

Pla

nm

10/7

54/

76Ti

mbe

r Man

agem

ent

Plan

IfRe

sour

ce P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

1/76

6/76

Cos

sato

t-Litt

le M

issou

riO

uach

ita N

F, Ar

kans

asLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

10/7

55/

76

Sout

h Fo

urch

e U

nit

»»•La

nd U

se P

lan

ii11

/75

3/76

Inte

rim O

ff-Ro

ad V

ehic

les

• n

Recr

eatio

nii

11/7

53/

76M

aum

elle

-Sal

ine

Uni

ttt

Laftd

Use

Pla

nii

11/7

57/

76Ti

mbe

r Man

agem

ent P

lan

Ozar

k NF

, A

rkan

sas

Reso

urce

Pla

nRe

gion

alFo

rest

er12

/75

6/76

Ozon

e U

nit

Plan

ftLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

st7/

75

•1/

76Su

perv

isor

FE

DE

RA

L

RE

GIS

TE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7—

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

50012 NOTICES

37

REGI

ON R

CON

TINU

ED

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

al

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Date

of F

inal

St.

Fran

cis

Uni

t Pl

anSt

. Fr

anci

s NF

A

rkan

sas

, La

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

10/7

55/

76

Veg

etat

ion

Man

agem

ent

with

Her

bici

des

Ozar

k-St

. Fr

anci

s NF

Ar

kans

as

Her

bici

de»

h4/

7511

/75

Off-R

oad

Veh

icie

Use

»»Re

crea

tion

f»9/

754/

76

Conr

oe U

nit

Nat

’1 F

ores

ts

in T

exas

Land

Use

Pla

nit

.8/

755/

76

Carib

bean

Uni

tCa

ribbe

an N

F, Pu

erto

Rico

Land

Use

Pla

ntt

12/7

56/

76

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 50013

' REG

IONA

L OF

FICE

Milw

auke

e, W

iscon

sin

Regi

on 9

38

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l *

Stat

emen

tLo

catio

nof

Prop

osal

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Da

te of

Fin

al

East

ern

Regi

on

USDA

, Fo

rest

Ser

vice

63

3 W

est W

iscon

sin A

venu

e M

ilwau

kee,

Wisc

onsin

53

203

Buzz

ard

Swam

p U

nit

Plan

Alle

ghen

y NF

, Pe

nnsy

lvan

iaLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

11/7

53/

76

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent P

lan

»»Re

sour

ce P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

12/7

56/

76

Dee

rfie

ld R

iver

Are

aGr

een

Mtn.

NF,

Verm

ont

Land

Use

Pla

nu

12/7

56/

76

Will

ow S

prin

g U

nit

Plan

Mark

Twa

in NF

, M

issou

riLa

nd U

se P

lan

/Fo

rest

Supe

rviso

r2/

769/

76

Tim

ber

Man

agem

ent P

lan

Ottaw

a NF

, M

ichig

anRe

sour

ce P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

12/7

56/

76

Off-R

oad

Veh

icle

Pol

icy

Shaw

nee

NF,

Illin

ois

Land

Use

Pla

nFo

rest

’ Su

perv

isor

6/76

12/7

6

Tim

ber M

anag

emen

t Pla

nSu

perio

r NF

,Re

sour

ce P

lan

Regi

onal

11/7

55/

76

FE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7---

FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

,.......

......

—...

. -.

........

. i..

........

.......

..i....

........

........

........

........

........

......^

50014 NOTICES

REGI

ON g

CO

NTI

NU

ED39

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

al

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osal

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Date

of F

inal

Kanc

amag

us U

nit

Plan

Whi

te M

tn. N

F, Ne

w Ha

mps

hire

Land

Use

Pla

nFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r10

/75

4/76

Evan

s No

tch U

nit

Plan

hLa

nd U

se P

lan

it1/

764/

76W

ater

ville

Uni

t Pl

anit

Land

Use

Pla

nh

8/76

11/7

6

f

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

75

NOTICES 50015

REGI

ONAL

OFF

ICE

SJu

neau

, A

lask

a

Regi

on 1

0

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l *

Stat

emen

t.Lo

catio

n N

atur

e of

of

Prop

osai

Prop

osai

(i

.e.,

Land

Use

,__

____

____

__H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

le

Date

Dra

ft .

Estim

ated

Off

icia

l Fi

led

w/CE

Q Da

te(o

r es

t. da

te)

of F

inal

Ala

ska

Regi

on

USDA

, Fo

rest

Ser

vice

Fe

dera

l O

ffic

e Bu

ildin

g P.

O. B

ox 1

628

June

au,

Ala

ska

9950

2

Honk

er D

ivid

eTo

ngas

s NF

, A

lask

aLa

nd U

se P

lan

Fore

stSu

perv

isor

5/7S

11/7

5

Long

Isl

and

nLa

nd U

se P

lan

il10

/75

1/76

Kar

ta U

nit

Plan

nLa

nd U

se P

lan

il1/

766/

76W

est C

hich

agof

-Yak

obi

Isla

ndit

Land

Use

Stu

dy

/ Land

Use

Stu

dy

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

7/75

12/7

5

Sout

hern

Chi

lkat

ttFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r4/

7510

/75

Bask

et B

ay

#2 T

imbe

r Sa

leu

Tim

ber

Sale

tt4/

759/

75Fr

eshw

ater

Bay

Blow

down

ttTi

mbe

r Sa

lett

5/75

11/7

5S.

Lin

denb

erg

Peni

nsul

att

Land

Use

Pla

ntt

10/7

53/

76

iFE

DE

RA

L R

EG

ISTE

R,

VO

L.

40

, N

O.

20

7--

--FR

IDA

Y,

OC

TO

BE

R

24

, 1

97

5

NOTICES

41RE

GION

3D CON

TINU

ED

Titl

e of

Env

ironm

enta

l St

atem

ent

Loca

tion

ofPr

opos

al

Nat

ure

of

Prop

osal

x(i.

e.,

Land

Use

, H

erbi

cide

, et

c.)

Resp

onsib

leO

ffic

ial

Date

Dra

ft Fi

led

w/CE

Q (o

r es

t. da

te)

Estim

ated

Date

of F

inal

Tong

ass

Land

Use

Pla

nTo

ngas

s NF

, A

lask

aLa

nd U

se P

lan

Regi

onal

Fore

ster

1/75

12/7

5

Kada

shan

mTi

mbe

r Sa

lett

10/7

53/

76

Seal

Cre

ek(

ItTi

mbe

r Sa

leFo

rest

Supe

rviso

r12

/75

Dang

erou

s Ri

ver

ftTi

mbe

r Sa

leh

1/76

1976

-86

Timb

er, M

anag

emen

t Pl

an R

evisi

onCh

ugac

h NF

, A

lask

aFu

nctio

nal

Plan

it3/

767/

76

.

Phas

e II

Upp

er P

rince

W

illia

m S

ound

uLa

nd U

se P

lan

If12

/75

4/76

Pass

age

Cana

ltt

Tim

ber

Sale

tt10

/75

12/7

5

Siwa

sh B

ay»»

T^ib

er S

ale

if

tt1/

764/

76

Shel

ter

Bay

nTi

mbe

r Sa

lett

2/76

5/76

FEDE

RAL

REGI

STER

, VO

L. 40

, NO

. 20

7—FR

IDAY

, OC

TOBE

R 24

, 19

7$

NOTICES 50017

50018 NOTICES

Forest Service

Chief, Forest Service US Department of Agriculture Washington, DC 20250

Region 1. Northern Region(Montana, NE Washington, N. Idaho,North Dakota and NW South Dakota)

Regional Forester Northern Region US Forest ServiceFederal Building .Missoula, Montana 59801

Region 2. Rocky Mountain Region(Colorado, Kansas., Nebraska, South Dakota and Wyoming)

Regional Forester Rocky Mountain Region US Forest Service Denver Federal Center, Bldg., 85 Denver, Colorado 80225

Region*3. Southwestern Region (Arizona and New Mexico)

Regional ForesterSouthwestern RegionUS Forest ServiceFederal Building517 Gold Ave., SWAlbuquerque, New Mexico 87101

Region 9-, Intermountain Region .(Utah, S. Idaho, W. Wyoming and Nevada)

Regional Forester Intermountain Region US Forest Service Federal Building 324 25th Street Ogden, Utgh 84401


NOTICES 5001943

Region 5, California Region (California and Hawaii)

Regional Forester California Region US Forest Service 630 Sansome Street •San Francisco, California 94-111

Region 6, Pacific Northwest Region (Washington and Oregon)

Regional ForesterPacific Northwest Region pUS Forest Service319 SW Pine StreetP.0. Box 3623Portland, Oregon 97208

Region 8, Southern Region(Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia)

Regional Forpster Southern Region US Forest Service 1720 Peachtree Road, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Region 9, Eastern Region(Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin)Regional Forester Eastern Region US Forest Service '633 W. Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203

Region 10, Alaska Region (Alaska) •

Regional Forester Alaska Region US Forest Service Federal Office Building Box 1628Juneau, Alaska 99801


50020 NOTICES

State and Private Forestry Areas

Note: State and Private Forestry offices are located in the Regional Headquarters with the exception of the following Areas:

Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry(Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin)

Director ♦Northeastern Area, S&PFUS Forest Service6816 Market StreetUpper Darby, Pennsylvania 19082

Southeastern Area State and Private Forestry(Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky; Louisiana Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia)

Director ' v Southeastern Area, S&PF US Forest Service 1720 Peachtree Road, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Research Headquarters

Forest and Range Experiment Stations

DirectorPacific Northwest Experiment StationUS Forest Service809 NE Sixth AvenueP.0. Box 3141Portland, Oregon 97208

DirectorPacific Southwest Experiment Station US Forest Service 1960 Addison Street P.0. Box 245Berkeley, California 94701


NOTICES 50021

45

DirectorIntermountain Experiment Station US Forest Service 507 25th Street Ogden, Utah 84-401

DirectorRocky Mountain Experiment StationUS Forest Service240 West Prospect StreetFort Collins, Colorado 80521

DirectorNorth Central Experiment StationUS Forest ServiceFolwell AvenueSt. Paul, Minnesota 55101

DirectorNortheastern Experiment StationUS Forest Service6816 Market StreetUpper Darby. Pennsylvania * 19082

Director 'Southern Experiment Station US Forest Service Federal Building, T-10210 701 Loyola Avenue New Orleans, Louisiana * 70113

DirectorSoutheastern Experiment Station US Forest Service Post Office Building P.0. Box 2570Asheville, North Carolina 28802

Institute of Tropical Forestry (and Caribbean National Forest)

DirectorInstitute of Tropical Forestry US Forest Service P.0. Box AQRio Piedras, Puerto Rico 00928


50022 NOTICES

46

Forest Products Laboratory

•Director <• Forest Products Laboratory US Forest Service North Walnut Street P.0. Box 5130Madison, Wisconsin 53705

[FR Doc.75-28383 Filed 10-23-75:8:45 am]


highlights - US Government Publishing Office

Documents

Transcript of highlights - US Government Publishing Office