Generic Powerpoint template - University of Kent
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Generic Powerpoint template - University of Kent
The UK’s European university
A novel approach to running final year research projects: empowering students to manage their own projects through embedded employability
Dr. Chris Shepherd
School of Physical Sciences
The module: PS620
• Final year project module (30 credits)
• 15% of final degree classification.
• Applicable to all BSc(Hons) degrees in
Forensic Science with/without a year in
industry.
• Main process takes 22 weeks across the two
teaching terms.
• Assessed by Progress Report, Presentation,
Supervisor’s Mark and Final Dissertation.
• Compulsory course component.
Page 2
The Motivation – Inside SPS
• In 2013, SPS had just launched a new
Chemistry degree.
• Staff workloads needed to be re-distributed to
facilitate the growth of the new course.
• Chemistry project supervisor were given
teaching on the Chemistry programme.
• Staff available for BSc Forensic Science
projects was significantly reduced.
Page 3
The Motivation - Personal
• Employability!
• Forensic Science in the UK has changed since
the Forensic Science Service (FSS) shut in
2012.
• Change from central government laboratories
to free market.
• Potentially more jobs, but also more
competitive with the range of relevant degree
programmes nationally.
• Need to make Kent graduates stick out from
the crowd.
Page 4
The Motivation - Personal
• Kent graduates should be strong candidates
due to the nature of the Forensic programme
offered here.
• One of the heaviest science-based Forensic
programmes in the country.
• However, BSc students’ abilities to carry our
research and problem solving was not as
strong as it could be.
• Students lacked independent thought.
• To plug the “skills deficit” that industry seems to
have acknowledged twinned with weaknesses
in the academic accreditation processes.Page 5
The Old Project System
• Classic science system of project allocation
based on choosing preferred projects from a
long list of options written by academic staff.
• Students hope they get their first choice but no
guarantees can be made.
• There’s a chance students aren’t truly
motivated by any of the topics.
• Had to choose a range of supervisors, even if
they wanted a specific one.
• Each supervisor was limited to a specific
number of students based on WAM.
• Lack of laboratory space for all of the students.Page 6
The New Project System
• Starts much earlier – During stage 2 rather than
at beginning of Stage 3.
• Briefed before Easter in Stage 2.
• Students now develop their own project from
start to end, coming up with their own ideas.
• The ideas are developed by communicating
with me during the Summer break by email
and/or through personal meetings.
• Takes a lot of work for 60+ students.
• Students should be ready to start project work
in Week 1 (compared to week 4-6 previously).
Page 7
The New Project System
• Students are supervised by a team of just 2
academics in the teaching laboratories.
• The academics are available in the laboratories
with the students all day every Tuesday for 22
weeks.
• Projects are further supported by 2 laboratory
technicians that help provide practical support
and order all required consumables/kit.
• Projects are supported by a good, sustainable
budget of £150 per student (totalling c.£9k+).
• Some students will work in groups for parts of
the project to carry out preliminary experiments
and share resources/budget.Page 8
The New Project System
• The onus is on the students to drive the project
forward, supported by academic staff.
• The idea is to be closer to research projects in
industry.
• Students run their own budgets (with academic
sign-off) and must keep track of costs
throughout + learn about hidden costs.
• Budget report must be produced as part of a
progress report in week 12, to also include a
critical review of work to date and a clear plan
of future work through the use of a Gantt chart.
• The emphasis is on project management skills
and good science.Page 9
Advantages for SPS
• Saved an entire FTE of workload in the WAM to
allow growth of the Chemistry programme.
• Mark profile has not changed – average mark is
still mid 2:1. Supported by 10% being
moderated internally.
• External examiners have praised the new
project process.
• Accrediting body CSoFS also has supported
the process.
• Has meant that we have not yet had to make
the transition to group projects, which are
becoming ever more present in science
programmes – good for NSS?Page 10
Advantages for students
• Increased employability and a new range of
transferable skills for graduates.
• Employers I have discussed this with think it is
really useful process and is very applicable to
industry.
• Increased independence and ownership
towards the research project process.
• Particularly rewards students that really engage
with the process and those that are extremely
capable.
• The marking process is more consistent that it
has ever been.Page 11
Thoughts So Far…
• Generally a big success.
• Students are being held to higher and more
consistent standards than previously.
• It can be easy to lose track of the couple of
students that do not engage with the process,
so some have to be chased and encouraged to
be more independent.
• The large of number students means a lot of
background work for the module convenor – it’s
all in the preparation!
• Loss of a key staff member has meant that it is
difficult to find an appropriate second staff
member.Page 12
Thoughts So Far…
• Year in industry students do best in the process
showing that they have learned related skills
whilst on placement.
• Students still struggle at times with the concept
of research project Vs experiment and the level
of detail required in this process.
• Research project success is very much dictated
by the confidence of the student and this
process looks to boost confidence.
• A sense of genuine project ownership is
regularly observed amongst students.
• Great skills to discuss at future job interviews.Page 13
Future developments
• Considering the introduction of group seminars
by generic project area to get groups of
students together to talk about progress.
• This might help reassure the top students they
are doing well as well as encourage students
that aren’t working hard enough.
• New member of staff to assist next year.
Page 14