Financial Reporting Analysis Final Project - CFA Institute
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Financial Reporting Analysis Final Project - CFA Institute
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
1
Huayi Brothers (300027.SZ)
Sector: Consumer Cyclical
Industry: Media – Diversified
Investment Highlights
Fundamentals and valuation methodologies indicate BUY. Based on Discounted Cash Flow
valuation methodologies, we arrive at the target price of RMB 46.9, a 48.3% upside from close
price as of Nov. 29, 2013. We believe Huayi Brothers will outperform due to the promising
prospect of its integration of business line, which successfully mitigates content quality risk from
vertical integration and creates synergy across different business line through horizontal
integration.
Huayi’s vertical integration of film business can effectively reduce its exposure to content
quality fluctuation and increase gross margin. The company has established a synergetic
business line from vertical integration in its film business, consisting of production and
investment, distribution, film exhibition and talent agency. The distribution business successfully
smooth content volatility and thus provides stronger downside protection via (1) advanced
decision of the best timeslot in releasing films, (2) provision of sufficient screening schedule rate,
and (3) effective advertising campaign to attract customers, while the theatre business provides
its distribution business strong negotiating power with theatre circuits, maximizing the return from
the film production.
Huayi has the best horizontal integration in the industry, enabling it to largely diversify
content risk and fully utilizing its content resource, and brings huge positive synergy. The
integration of mobile gaming with film allows Huayi to fully utilize premium film and drama
resources, on a recursive basis. Integration of TV drama series and music with film allows
sharing of resources, and gives Huayi positive synergy. Integration of travel with film has a huge
potential with a downside protection.
Current stage of development of the Chinese film industry remains the growth period,
providing a good opportunity in investing in industry leader. In recent years, China’s film
industry has been growing steadily. The industry continuously grows overall with high profits and
low levels of competition. But it is still marginal in the media industry, implying a huge room for
future expansion. The immature state of the market provides potentials for investment and a
good sign for the industry leader, Huayi, due to its occupation of first-mover advantage.
Business Description
Huayi is one of the largest private-owned listed media companies in China
Founded in 1994 by the Chairman & CEO Mr. Wang Zhongjun and President Mr. Wang Zhonglei,
Huayi Brothers (“Huayi”) is one of the largest private entertainment players in China. Huayi got
listed on ChiNext in 2009 with a current market capitalization of approximately RMB 33bn,
among the largest companies listed on ChiNext.
Emphasis stressed on integration and aiming at full coverage of media industry
The Beijing-based company first started out with film production, and later expanded into talent
management and TV drama production. In July 2013, the company announced its acquisition of
mobile game developer Yinhan Technology to expand into game content creating, showing an
attempt to execute a broad entertainment strategy consisting of 6 components, namely, film
production and distribution, TV drama production, talent management, movie theatres, music,
gaming and derivatives (i.e., theme parks). (Figure 1)
Film business chain: Huayi itself produces and distributes films. It also has an interest in
Assault Films (founded by Wu Yanzu and Feng Delun) and Eastern Legend (a joint venture with
Legend Film Company). Huayi has several overseas companies to help distribute their films.
Additionally, Huayi holds theater subsidiaries to occupy whole produce-distribute- show value
chain.
RECOMMENDATON: BUY
PRICE TARGET: ¥46.90
Market Data
Huayi Brothers (SZSE:300027)
Market Capitalization 36,675M
Shares Out.(mn) 1,209.60
Main share Holders:
- Zhongjun, Wang 23.90%
- Zhonglei, Wang 7.32%
- Tencent Holdings Ltd. 4.60%
Free Float (%) 64.18%
Last Share Price 31.6
1 year Range 12.09-79.30
Beta 0.9
P/E(TTM) 151.6
EPS(TTM) 0.2
EV/EBITDA (2013E) 52.5x
ROE 12.6
BV per share (2013E) 17.8
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Film TV drama
Talent agent & music Theater
Game
Figure 1: Huayi’s revenue structure
Source: Huayi annual reports
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
2
Talent management: Huayi’s subsidiary Shidai Agent manages talent agent business; Lanhai
Huayi, a joint venture with Jiangsu broadcasting and TV bureau, organizes vocal live shows.
Shishang Media engages mainly in super model agent.
TV drama production: Huayi’s subsidiary Yule Investment produces and distributes TV drama
series. Besides studios incorporated, Huayi also have subsidiaries named Zhengjiang Tianyi and
Zhejiang Film Investment.
Music: Subsidiary Huayi Music engages in music.
Derivatives: Huayi holds an interest in Ourpalm Technology, an A-share listed mobile game
company; Huayi announced acquisition of Yinhan Technology, also a mobile game maker; Giant
Information conducts the online game business; Shijing Entertainment takes part in theme part
and tourism business; Huayi Vision does advertising business.
Successful and sustainable production of high-quality movies
On the back of first-in-class talent management franchise and near exclusive relationship with
highest-grossing directors in China, Huayi is China’s most accomplished and consistent movie
producer with a track record of delivering regional blockbusters including, If You Are the One
(2010), After Shock (2010), Painted Skin (2012), CZ12 (2012) and Young Detective Dee (2013),
all with box office results in the region of multi-hundred million RMB.
Industry Overview & Competitive Positioning
Industry overview
Current stage of development of the Chinese film industry remains the growth period,
but still marginal in the media industry, implying a huge room for future expansion
In recent years, China’s film industry has been growing steadily. (Figure 2) Despite a gradual
decline since 2010, the industry continues to grow overall with high profits and low levels of
competition. Compared with the film industry in North America, China’s film industry may not be
as stable, due to the lack of capital. However, the immature state of the market provides
potentials for investment. Moreover, revenue for the film industry only makes up 3% of the entire
cultural industry, implying a huge room for future growth and expansion. (Appendix 1)
Highly competitive and volatile nature of the movie production and distribution industry
As in the production side, in 2012, China's top ten movie companies took 37% of market share,
with the most remarkable of these companies being Enlight Pictures, Huayi Brothers and China
Film Group. Looking at both the number of productions in which they were involved and their box
office shares, these companies have shown considerable stability. (Figure 3)
Figure 3: Market share in film production industry
2011 2012
Company
Market
share
No. of
films Company
Market
share No. of films
1 China Film Group 4.39% 18 Enlight Pictures 7.23% 10
2 Bona Film 3.81% 10 Huayi Brothers 6.82% 8
3 Huayi Brothers 2.42% 8 Yingyitong 3.14% 1
4 Galloping Horse Film 2.20% 4 Zhengledao Media 3.14% 1
5 Movie Channel Center 1.98% 14 H/B Studio 3.14% 1
6 Shanghai Film Group 1.60% 7 China Film Group 2.70% 17
7 Zhonglian Jinghua 1.64% 3
Hangzhou Culture
Radio Film 2.35% 3
8 Henan Film Group 1.63% 2 H&R Century 2.30% 2
9 Guoli Changsheng 1.58% 2 Huashu Media 2.30% 1
10 Anhui Media Group 1.49% 2 Sichuan Zhonglan 2.30% 1
In distribution side, five companies with the largest market shares in distribution accounted for
82.7% of the nationwide market, which was a noticeable increase over the 77.6% concentration
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Chinese film industry growth
Figure 2
Source: Enn
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
3
in the market in 2011. (Appendix 2) Notably, private companies are becoming more active and
four companies split market share for each season. (Appendix 3)
Content exposure remains the theme of risk in film industry
The fate of film companies largely depend on the unpredictable quality of content
The inherent nature of the film industry is the co-existence of high investment, high risk and high
return, with the risk largely owing to the unpredictability of the boxing performance, which in
essence is the uncertainty of content quality and creation. Also, the impact of such exposure
would be enhanced by the increasing requirement of initial capital of the film production.
Cases include MGM’s failure on Wingtalkers, which later induces the resignation of senior
management and acquisition by SONY Corp. While Enlight used Lost in Thailand to jump from
number 15+ in 2011 to the first place in 2012 among China's movie companies. (Figure 4)
Figure 4: Enlight Media stock performance
In 2012, beside the top 3, the remaining 7 companies all rose to top 10 solely because of their
participation in one of the hottest movies, with 3 of them in Lost in Thailand and the other 4 in
Painted Skin: The Resurrection.
The downside potential of content exposure could be mitigated by vertical integration
An example would be a business model that combines the film production and distribution. As
the film industry is quite similar to the cosmetics industry in the demand end, where the
consumers’ perception of the quality of goods and movies play an important role. Such nature
determines that the loss from a poorly produced film could be partially compensated by the
subsequent marketing effect. Thus if a group has substantial interest both in the production and
distribution, it could leverage the marketing advantages in distribution to provide a downside
protection for the content exposure, and consequently mitigate the risk aroused from the content
quality. (Figure 5)
The upside potential of the content quality could be magnified by horizontal integration
Under the horizontal integration of film with other forms, one single theme or topic can be
transformed into different products, maximizing the business value of the same theme. With
horizontal integration, artificially selected premium content would be fully utilized, and the content
would be magnified.
Sino-US comparison
Integration is a trend if benchmarking on the evolution of American movie industry
A common practice of media industry study would be benchmarking on the evolution of the
American movie industry, due to the maturity of Hollywood and the similar nature of the film
industry across border.
In the US, firms with premium brands expanded very rapidly, causing smaller firms soon to
vanish, or only live in dependency of the big firms. Since the beginning when thousands of film
makers competed, the evolution has led to a rather concentrated market. Using the data of 2012
box offices, the United States film industry CR8 has reached 88.4%—indicating that the market
is basically divided up by some oligarchs.
Case study: Disney Corp
Film industry FMCG
High screening
schedule rate Intensive sales web
Massive
advertising
campaign
Massive advertising
campaign
Optimal timeslot
in film releasing
Optimal timeslot in
product launching
Figure 5: The similarity in marketing
methods between the two industries
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
4
Name Description
China Film Group
The biggest and oldest film company in China; have
biggest annual production
Huaxia Film Distribution
Company
One of the two companies that can distribute foreign
films (the other is China Film)
Local SOEs, e.g.: Shanghai
Film Group
Provincial film makers, e.g.:
Shanxi Film Studio
Huayi Brothers
A-share listed; full value chain coverage, the most
famous media group in China
Bona
Focusing more on distribution; have many self-own
theaters
Hengdian Film Group
The only national film experiment district; has film
toursim industry
Enlight Media
A-share listed; prestigious in TV programs; Lost in
Thailand is the No.1 gross box office in China
SOEs
Private
enterprises
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
100
200
300
400
China FilmGroup
HuayiBorthers
Enlight Media
Box office, 2012
Average box office per film shown in theater (MM RMB)
Average box office per film invested (MM RMB)
Film made (right axis)
Film shown in Mainland China (right axis)
When compared with S&P index, we can conclude 3 high-speed growth periods for Disney:
1967-1973, 1984-1991 and 1994-1997. All of the growth was triggered by Disney’s whole value
chain integrations. (Figure 6)Since November 1994, total return on Disney stock was about
400%, or 150 percentage points above S&P. Currently, Disney is a fully diversified, whole value
chain media empire. (Appendix 4)
Competitive landscape of film industry
Business coverage of major players
The Chinese film industry consists of two types of players: SOEs and private enterprises. The
two giant SOEs, China Film and Huaxia, have been dominating Chinese film industry, and are
still playing very important role due to their scale, as well as monopoly in film import. The private
enterprises diverse in their operation along the film value chain. (Figure 7)
Figure 7: Chinese film companies
By comparing the business models of the competitors, we may conclude that Huayi is the most
integrated film company with broadest coverage involving film, TV drama, talent agent, and
derivatives etc. within the industry. (Figure 8)
Figure 8: Chinese film companies business models
Market share of Huayi
Huayi is the leading player in production and distribution, with sizable share in TV and music
market. In 2012, average box office result of Huayi’s film was much better than its peers,
indicating a strong content and distribution ability. (Figure 9) Huayi ranked 2nd
and 3rd
in
production and distribution market, respectively, in 2012. (Appendix 5 & 6)
Investment Summary
Vertical integration of film business can effectively reduce its exposure to
content quality fluctuation and increase gross margin
By the construction of the vertically integrated business model, the content volatility in the film
can be reasonably mitigated. At the same time the integrated business line also create synergy
CompanyHuayi
Brothers
China Film
Group
Huaxia
Film
Enlight
MediaBona Wanda
Film making √ √ √ √ √ ×
Film distributing √ √ √ √ √ ×
Film showing √ √ √ × √ √
Import films × √ √ × × ×
TV drama making
and distributing√ × × √ × ×
Talent agent √ × × × √ ×
Music √ × × × × ×
Game √ × × × × ×Figure 9
Figure 6: The integration of Disney
Year Disney’s integration
1967 Theme park commenced construction
1984 Touchstone Pictures was established
1985 Started to make TV carton
1993 Acquisition of Miramax
1996 Acquisition of ABC and Jumbo Pictures
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
5
form cost internalization and revenue cross-boosting that we believe has not been fully reflected
in its price currently.
The company has established a synergetic business line from vertical integration
Huayi’s expertise and relatively complete construction and participation throughout film industry
value chain create massive synergy surrounding its core film production business (Figure 10).
Production and investment: Through its experience in the movie industry, the company seeks
movie projects that can generate best returns. It can secure distribution rights in high potential
movies through investing or participating in film production.
Distribution: The company uses its distribution experience to decide the best time schedule to
produce films, ensuring quality films are released in every peak season. Additionally, distribution
experience also enables the company to discern Chinese audiences’ taste and selectively invest
in film production, thus reducing investment risk. Also the distribution business would reduce the
exposure to the content risk from the production business (elaborated later).
Film exhibition: The film exhibition business strengthens the distribution business by giving it
significant bargaining power with theatre circuits. Theatre circuits form an important part of the
film value chain between film distribution and film exhibition.
Talent agency: Talent agency business helps it secure key talent for its in-house production
movies. Additionally, it helps in obtaining desirable films for distribution, additional insights into
film projects and other source / contacts for promising film opportunities. The company
represented over 100 artists at the end of 3Q13 and grows at a 10% growth rate per year. The
company is the largest talent agency in the mainland China.
Figure 11: Synergetic business line
The distribution business successfully smooths content volatility and thus provides
stronger downside protection
Huayi’s strong film distribution business may serve as a marketing department for
self-produced films and thus smooth the content volatility. Huayi Brothers has emerged as
the largest private film distributor in China. The company’s market share in the distribution
business is only behind China Film Group and Huaxia, both are government-owned players. As
documented in the industry analysis, there is similarity across film industry and the fast-moving
consumer goods industry, where the perceived quality of the products plays an essential role,
given the prerequisite that the combination of film distribution is strong to create marketing
power.
Huayi’s distribution business is actually providing a guarantee for the films which it has
participated in the production. Noteworthy, almost all the films Huayi distributed are those they
Figure 10: Huayi’s full value chain
creates synergy
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
6
have been participating in production. According to Huayi’s CFO, this trend won’t change in the
near future, which is quite different from its competitors, whose decision to acquire the
distribution rights was supported by the analysis on a variety of factors that typically include a
film’s expected critical reception, marketability, and potential for box office success. Thus, there
would be clear evidence that such business model would provide a guarantee for the films which
it has participated in the production.
The theatre business provides its distribution business strong negotiating power with
theatre circuits, maximizing the return from the film production
The theatre business assists companies in securing preferred scheduling rights. The film
exhibition business strengthens the distribution business of Huayi by giving it significant
bargaining power with theatre circuits. Theatre circuits form an important part of the film value
chain between film distribution and film exhibition. (Figure 12) The increasing investments in
movie theatres assist in securing the preferred scheduling rights, including timeslot and
screening schedule rate of films. The scheduling rights are key drivers to increase selected films’
market share as well as their box office. In 2013, the movie Tiny Times broke the records of the
whole Chinese film history by gaining a 45.01% first day screening schedule rate in over 20
major cities. Although the viewers’ opinions mixed, the extremely high screening schedule rate
still drives the box office broking RMB 2bn in the first three days of the film releasing. We believe
by enhancing control power in scheduling tights, the company will have a stronger capability to
provide a premium movie-going experience for the Chinese audience and increase the desire for
Chinese-oriented content. (Appendix 7)
Figure 12: Presence across film value chain
The theatre business also assists companies in securing more favorable revenue split,
and prompt and accurate payments by theater circuits. In 2012, revenue generated by the
Chinese film industry totaled $3.3 billion, an increase of 18%. Of this total, box office accounted
for $2.7 billion. (Figure 13) Due to the policy bonus in China, the box office split is highly
leveraged to theatres (Figure 14) by allocating around 50%. At the same time, theatre business
also profit from other sources of income, such as the sales of goods, rental of on-site advertising
space, and the preshow ads before films are shown. These sources of added income contribute
to the daily operational proceeds for each movie theater. Without considering the acquisition of
other theaters, assuming that starting in 2012, Huayi Brothers maintain the speed of opening 10
theaters a year, for each movie theater, its main operating revenue includes ticket sales and
Figure 13: Scale and growth of
Chinese film industry
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
7
other revenue (sale revenue, advertising revenue, etc.), the main operating costs include (box
office spilt to producers and distributors (39.4%), rent, business tax and surcharges (3%), movie
special fund (3.5%) and others. We expect the theater business can achieve operating income of
458 million in 2013.
Figure 14: Box office split on an average
Huayi has the best horizontal integration in the industry, enabling it to largely
diversify content risk and fully utilizing its content resource, and brings huge
positive synergy
The current horizontal integration of Huayi is well positioned
Huayi has already stretched to talent agent, TV drama series, films, music, and other derivative
businesses. (Figure 15) In the United States, post-window distribution (such as online TV, cables,
DVDs etc.) and derivatives has become the majority of the revenue in the film industry, whereas
the ticket box revenue accounts for only 20%. (Appendix 8) Film productions have to be run in
connection with other media platforms to produce synergy, thus value of the films could
be fully utilized. Several recent acquisitions, such as Times Warner’s acquisition of Turner
Broadcasting, Viacom’s acquisition of Paramount and DreamWorks, and Disney’s acquisition of
ABC, have all proved this idea.
Integration of mobile gaming with film allows Huayi to fully utilize premium film and
drama resources, on a recursive basis.
In 2013, Huayi announced its acquisition plan for Yinhan Technology, a mobile game producer,
at a total consideration of 0.67 billion comprised of cash and stock.
Mobile game industry is growing fast with a promising future. Mobile game theme has been
a hot topic in China’s capital market due to its high growth potential. Chinese online game market
size reached 66.2 billion RMB in 2012, an increase of 24% from 2011, according to iResearch.
Mobile game accounted for 7.8 billion, or 11.9% of revenue of online game industry, and will
witness very fast growth in the following years. It is forecasted that the mobile game market will
reach 25 billion in 2016, indicating a CAGR of 35%.
The acquisition of Yinhan reflects no obvious synergy in stock price. Huayi paused its
trading on Shenzhen Stock Exchange on June 4, 2013, until July 24, when it released its
acquisition plan and continued its trade. We try to observe the return in the window from June 4
to August 14, the day before Huayi announced its Q2 earnings. During this period, the market
capitalization of Huayi increased by 2.51 billion (net of the industry effect, as measured by
culture and broadcast composite). We compare this additional market capitalization with the
anticipated fair value of the 50.88% investment in Yinhan, which we have estimated through a
comparable P/E multiple analyses to be at 3.57 billion. Since there is about 1 billion short in the
increase of market capitalization, our analysis suggests that no obvious positive synergy was
recognized in the acquisition by the market. (Figure 16)
However, the mutual and recursive promotion between gaming and film should provide
significant positive synergy to Huayi. It’s very common in industry practices to make sequels
for both popular films and games. When a film and a game share one common theme, the
mutual and recursive promote between them can be expected: for example, good topic depicted
in the film raises demand for the theme game, and the theme game leverages the theme of the
topic to fill fans’ imagination, pushing the topic even hotter. Case: Harry Potter series are famous
for the recomposing of film to the game. In the Harry Potter game, the players could control the
character and explore the magic world, which serves as a perfect complement for the film. The
Harry Potter series have been the most successful films series in the history, totaling over 7
Figure 15:
Computation of Yinhan synergy
Stock price of Huayi 6/4 14.275
Return from 6/4 to 8/14, Huayi 42.91%
Return from 6/4 to 8/14, Culture industry
index 28.36%
Huayi abnormal return 14.55%
Total outstanding shares of Huayi (MM) 1,210
Increase in Huayi market value (MM) 2,512
Yinhan comparable companies P/E on 8/14
Shunwang Technology, 300113 67.5
Bestv New Media, 600637 58.1
Peoplecn, 603000 40.3
Ourpalm Technology, 300315 89.3
Average Yinhan comparable companies
P/E on 8/14 63.8
Yinhan 2013E profit (MM) 110
Huayi's holding interest 50.88%
Implied Yinhan market value (MM) 3,570
Figure 16:
Figure 17: Harry Potter’s film and game
interaction
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
8
billion box office earnings. (Figure 17)
Integration of TV drama series and music with film allows sharing of resources, and
gives Huayi positive synergy.
Under the horizontal integration of film with other forms of art, one single theme can be
transformed into different chains of Huayi, maximizing the business value of the same theme.
Case: Aftershock (Tang Shan Da Di Zhen) was initially a Feng Xiaogang film that was shown in
2010. As the poll reflected positive ticket revenue, Huayi recomposed the film to a TV drama
series to be shown in major TV stations in 2013.
Integration of travel with film has a huge potential with a downside protection
Huayi has already launched its travel program in cities of Shanghai, Suzhou etc., and we believe
this act provides both upside potential and downside protection, thus worth a high valuation.
Traveling and film business can motivate each other, Huayi especially benefiting from
strong contents. Disneyland and its animations being the best example, the tour site that is
based on films can in turn promote value for the film themes, and at the same time make
considerable profit through tickets and commercial estates. As one of the best content provider in
China, Huayi is most possible to translate the contents into attractions in the tour sites, and
consequently economical earnings.
Huayi’s investment in tour sites has a solid downside protection from licensing of the
contents, and no upside limit. Taking the Suzhou Film City as an example, Huayi has only
acted as coinvestor in the project, and has an option to increase its share in the future. Plus,
before the film city commenced its construction, Huayi could charge a license fee for using the
copyrights of its content.
Valuation
Discount Cash Flow Method
The base price from this model is RMB46.9 per share. With 1 year forward EBITDA of RMB
1,087mm, which implies 52.4x EV/EBITDA FY1, in line with comparable companies. See
appendix 9 for FCF calculation.
Five Year Projected Cash Flow Assumptions
We start our projection at Sep. 30, 2013 to Dec. 2017. Five year EPS CAGR is estimated to be
39.57% as a result of strong synergy realized from vertical and horizontal integration, safe
margin and continued monetization on well-established competitive positioning.
Revenue Projection
We identified 7 segments for the purpose of revenue projection, Film Production, Film
Distribution, TV Drama Production, Talent Management, Movie Theatres, Gaming and
Derivatives.
In projecting revenue from film production, we assumed a reasonable average film production
cycle of 2 years and built a film premier schedule (Appendix 10) to project number of films put
into marketplace per year. Subsequent segment revenue was the product of this number and
average box office result, estimated from prior Huayi movies growing at a conservative rate of 20%
per annum (gradually moving down to 10% per annum).
Our film distribution revenue was taken as a percentage of film production revenue, basing on
our understanding that Huayi primarily distributes its own productions. The share of distribution
revenue against production revenue reflects synergy realization achieved by production and
distribution integration.
Our TV drama production projection was based on a bottom-up approach, stemming from a
conservative estimation of number of studios and equally conservative production rate
estimation (as low as 1 production per studio per year). Average price per production projection
was based on historical numbers and a reasonable 15% annual increase due to increasing
competition among online video services and TV channels for broadcasting rights, bringing
Enterprise Value Implied Equity Value and Share Price
Cumulative Present Value of FCF $3,483.5
Exit EBITDA $2,035.8
Exit Multiple (1Y Forward) 39.8x
Terminal Value $80,941.3
Discount Factor 0.66
Present Value of Terminal Value $53,484.6
% of Enterprise Value 93.9%
Enterprise Value $56,968.1
Terminal Value
Implied Equity Value and Share Price Implied Perpetuity Growth Rate
Enterprise Value $56,968.1
Less: Total Debt (1,598.7)
Less: Preferred Securities -
Less: Noncontrolling Interest (3.7)
Plus: Cash and Cash Equivalents 1,402.1
Implied Equity Value $56,767.8
Shares Outstanding 1,210
Implied Share Price $46.9
Implied EV/EBITDA
Enterprise Value $56,968.1
2014E EBITDA 1,086.8
Implied EV/EBITDA 52.4x
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
9
ever-high return for TV drama producers.
Revenue from movie theatres was projected basing on a conservative estimation of new theatre
addition rate and revenue realization schedule. Gaming revenue projection was based on
consensus annual growth rate of 30% and an conservative additional 10% due to synergy
realization from game development and Huayi’s ample content reserve that would not have been
achieved if Yinhan remained a standalone entity. Since derivative revenue cannot be reasonably
estimated, we safely assumed same annual growth as 2012.
WACC
We use the Chinese 10-year government bond risk-free rate of 4.5%, the expected market return
of 11% and the adjusted beta of 0.9 to reflect the Cost of Equity of 10.4%. While the Cost of Debt
is 4.8% from the company short term borrowing filings. Also we assume a constant capital
structure of Huayi in the following years with a Debt to Total Company Value of 2%. Then we
come to the Weighted Average Cost of Capital of 10.24% in the coming years for valuation
purposes.
Terminal Value Component Assumptions
Since Huayi is in an ultra-high growth sector, its valuation enjoys stellar multiple (the EV/FY1
EBITDA we used in our model was 39.8x, the median EV/FY1 EBITDA from Huayi’s 10 closest
comparables) which resulted in terminal value taking ~90% of total enterprise value. We believe
this is well justified as the implied perpetuity growth rate was a mere 8.5%.
Financial Analysis
Earnings
Stable rise in revenue created by the vertical value chain: Movie production revenue is
always the largest composition of the company’s revenue, 557.2 million RMB in 2012 and
contributing 40.19% of total revenue. Surrounded by the movie production business growth rate
of 20.3%, the movie distribution enjoys an increase rate of 79.8% to 55.7 million RMB in 2012,
while revenue contributed by the movie theatres increased at 73.08% to 128.5 million in 2012.
Gaming business enjoys the highest gross profit margin as a new growth engine: The
gaming business has reached a gross profit margin of 92.31% and 94.62% respectively in the
past two years, the highest one in all business segments. We believe the gaming industry would
continue its rapid growth in the coming five years.
Moderate ROE and ROA: Huayi Brothers return on asset reached 4.9% in December 2012, due
to large assets generated by abundant cash.
Balance Sheet
Increasing capacity in short term liquidity: The stable decline trend in three short-term
liquidity ratios indicate that Huayi is becoming increasingly capable of paying back its short-term
liabilities with its short-term assets (Appendix 14).
Aggressive CAPEX to fight in new business fields: The expansion into both vertical and
horizontal film business chain cost Huayi Brothers high investment, implying high CAPEX. The
capital expenditure was CNY¥156.8, 141.2 million in 2011 to 2012, respectively. We forecast
the CAPEX would still maintain a stable growth rate in the coming five years. In the movie
theatres investments, since 2010, the number of the newly constructed theatres increased by
about five per year. CAPEX to develop them will be CNY¥40-50 million per theatre in 2012-15.
Although we forecast aggressive CAPEX, CAPEX to sales ratio tend to be stable due to the rapid
growth of sales correspondently.
Risks
Upside risk
National policy reemphasis on accelerating development of the film industry
The Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee ended in late November this year
reemphasis on accelerating development of the culture sector. In the past three years, the
Implied Perpetuity Growth Rate
Terminal Year Free Cash Flow $1,315.0
WACC 10.2%
Terminal Value $80,941.3
Implied Perpetuity Growth Rate 8.5%
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
10
central government has released over ten policies to support and help the film industry to
maintain the high growth rate. On the December 1st last year, three new policies are published.
The government will subsidize domestically produced and distributed 3D, IMAX and high-tech
films, based on box office revenue, refund policy for newly developed theaters and subsidize the
installation of digital projection system - Theaters with a 45% or more box office gross revenue
within the last year may also enjoy special subsidized refunds. We believe in the near future,
national policy will become more and more leveraged to the support film industry. Huayi diversify
this risk by making ongoing investments to keep paces with national trend.
More common cross-board M&A stronger competitiveness in the international market
As China’s economy becomes stronger, mergers and acquisitions are becoming the most
effective way for Chinese companies to enter into and compete in the international market. Data
show a total of $11.7 billion USD in foreign investment in 2012, which was a 4.5% decrease over
the previous year. Huayi diversify this risk by relying on the fast growing China market to exploit
the opportunity of international coinvestment and co-production, becoming the bridge to connect
Chinese films with Hollywood as well as comprising pioneers in the international distribution of
films produced in China. It has leveraged this advantage in international distribution to cultivate
strategic alliances with distributors for foreign markets.
Moviegoer numbers reach 470 million as audience tastes mature
The total number of moviegoers reached 470 million in 2012, an increase in 27% over the
previous year. Between 2007 and 2012, admissions peaked in 2009 and 2010, and were
followed by a slowing in growth, which indicates market saturation. In 2012, the domestic
slapstick comedy Lost in Thailand was the highest grossing film in China, with total admissions of
over 35 million, well surpassing Hollywood blockbusters like “Avatar” and “Titanic 3D”. This is
evidence that Chinese viewers are eager for high-quality domestically produced films. Films from
a wide range of genres are now able to meet the needs of Chinese audiences and increase box
office revenue. Huayi respond to this trend by building up a film library to obtain sustainable
revenue.
Downside risk
Increasing reliance on in-house production adds to business volatility
The company has increased its presence in film investment and production, which adds inherent
risks to the business. However, Huayi Brothers has a “portfolio” approach to film production,
diversifying film investment across genres and reducing economic interest through “film
participation”. The company diversifies its capitalat-risk in film investment by syndicating film
investment to other investors while trying to keep its stake not more than 50% of the total
investment amount.
Revenue concentration—Top 5 films comprised over 70% of revenue in 2009
Top 5 films accounted for more than 70% of revenue from the 16 films distributed by the
company in 2009. However, as the company continues to seek an overall higher-quality movie
portfolio, we expect revenue concentration to be lowered.
Potential change in the supportive regulatory landscape
Apart from the consensus optimistic view on the national policy in culture industry, overall the
government is supportive of the film industry development in China. However, if the government
reduces tax breaks or becomes more vigilant on film content, the profitability of the company
could be affected.
Departure of key management likely to affect distribution and production
Film distribution and production business are highly human-centric. The top management of the
company significantly uses its influence and reputation to source distribution rights as well as
source quality artists for the films it produces. The departure of key management may also affect
the execution capabilities of the company, in our view.
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
11
Appendices
Appendix 1
China’s cultural consumption
Film revenue accounts for less than 3% in cultural industry
36%
61%
2% 1%
Chinese culural expenditure, 2012
Publishing and printing Tourism Gaming Film
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
12
Appendix 2
Chinese film distribution market share
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
13
Appendix 3
Chinese film market has seasonality
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
14
Appendix 4
Disney has grown to a media empire with full diversification and coverage
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
15
Appendix 5
Huayi’s leading market share in film production
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
16
Appendix 6
Huayi’s leading market share in film distribution
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
17
Appendix 7
Huayi is the leading film distributor in China film industry
Huayi maintains a healthy relationship with most of the theatre circuits in China. Huayi distributed 8, 6 and 7 domestic
films in 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Although the total number of distributed movies was less than its nearest
competitors, the numbers of blockbusters distributed is far beyond its competitors. Thurs, it remains the largest private
distributor in China in terms of revenue market share. Total box office revenue for Huayi Brothers in 2012 totaled over $333
million.
The company had a steady track record of distribution, especially blockbusters distribution over the past three years. We
believe it will be able to maintain its strength in distribution given its relationship and ability to secure distribution rights.
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
18
Appendix 8
US film industry relies very few on box office
CFA Institute Research Challenge November 29th
, 2013
26
Disclosures:
Ownership and material conflicts of interest:
The author(s), or a member of their household, of this report does not hold a financial interest in the securities of this company.
The author(s), or a member of their household, of this report does not know of the existence of any conflicts of interest that might bias the content
or publication of this report.
Receipt of compensation:
Compensation of the author(s) of this report is not based on investment banking revenue.
Position as a officer or director:
The author(s), or a member of their household, does not serve as an officer, director or advisory board member of the subject company.
Market making:
The author(s) does not act as a market maker in the subject company’s securities.
Disclaimer:
The information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources generally available to the public and believed by the author(s) to be
reliable, but the author(s) does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy or completeness. The information is
not intended to be used as the basis of any investment decisions by any person or entity. This information does not constitute investment advice, nor
is it an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security. This report should not be considered to be a recommendation by any individual
affiliated with CFA Beijing, CFA Institute or the CFA Institute Research Challenge with regard to this company’s stock.
CFA Institute Research Challenge