Fairbairn and Nāgārjuna: Objects and Subjects

0

By

–

May 2011

1

2

– 3 3 5 6 7 8 11 12 14

17 17 18 19 21 24

27

27 29 30 31 32

34

8 9 10 10 12 13 24 25

2

-‐

3

Fairbairn and the Freudian Background

-‐

-‐

-‐

-‐ -‐

In

per se 84

Fairbair

4

Fairbairn

-‐

-‐

-‐

–

The Ego and the Id

and

-‐

58

5

a

n

I

y

Melanie Klein

both

n

6

– -‐

in and as distinct from non-‐ –

–

Fairbairn

Object and Drive

-‐

his

–

–

7

non-‐

-‐

-‐

-‐ and

The Affective Aspect

38

8

Dichotomization

Fairba

br

-‐ -‐

The universe of primary narcissism, as yet unfragmented by dissatisfaction.

9

110

–

The universe immediately subsequent to fragmentation of

primary narcissism, with differentiation of two experiential qualities. Self as subject becomes possible through aggression. True objects begin to take substance.

10

110-‐

on

Bad

Good and

Bad

Good and bad internal objects prior to

differentiation of bad object.

Hate is projected onto the unsatisfying/rejected part object first,

followed by love onto the satisfying/accepted part object. The two affectively charged external part objects

are then internalized.

11

110

moral defensive

Fai

-‐

bad

Ambiguous Bad Object

–

12

–

Ego Splitting

-‐

–

and –

-‐

–

Good and bad internal objects subsequent to differentiation of

bad internal object.

13

-‐

central ego, libidinal ego, and anti-‐libidinal ego.

-‐

-‐

-‐ -‐-‐

-‐

– –

14

-‐

-‐

-‐

Self and Being

being

self -‐

-‐

-‐

-‐

n -‐ -‐

-‐ -‐

15

-‐

is -‐

and

-‐

-‐

-‐in-‐ -‐

Original ego

-‐ -‐

-‐

-‐

17

Creating Reality

being

-‐

-‐

–

–

all

18

has

does y

of as one of

a

y na

y

y

Connecting with

–

–

–

19

as

–

is –

-‐

Logic and Language

– seem –

not

20

–

-‐ ry a

–

-‐

-‐

21

– in

-‐

-‐

– –

-‐

Paradox

-‐ – –

-‐

–

22

M

...

reductio

no

–

–

23

61-‐

– an

cannot particular

-‐

–

–

– -‐

– – –

–

24

M

Tetralemma

koti

– –

-‐

The undifferentiated phenomenal experience is conceptually bisected,

splitting that field into two possibilities – one of which

must be eliminated.

T

by

25

M

In

nor B

27

Construction of Convention

T

universal commonality universal essence –

– an

and

L

not even one

The phenomenological experience would be of no thing / nothing.

–

28

-‐

o

‘ ’

-‐

29

Object Relations and the Middle Way

–

I

-‐

–

– -‐

30

Subject Relations

–

in

– object of subject

-‐ -‐

-‐ my -‐

my

31

Return to the Ultimate

M

only

-‐

re-‐entry

– I

n-‐

-‐

is

fully

32

Blended Practice

by

in

33

non-‐subjectively

87-‐

–

34

nd

-‐

-‐

and

Fairbairn and Nāgārjuna: Objects and Subjects

Documents

Transcript of Fairbairn and Nāgārjuna: Objects and Subjects