Erythropoietin directly stimulates osteoclast precursors and induces bone loss
Effects of Erythropoietin on Hippocampal Volume and Memory in Mood Disorders
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Effects of Erythropoietin on Hippocampal Volume and Memory in Mood Disorders
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 1
Title: Effects of erythropoietin on hippocampal volume and memory in mood disorders
Short title: Hippocampal effects of erythropoietin in mood disorders
Authors: Kamilla W. Miskowiak, Maj Vinberg, Julian Macoveanu, Hannelore Ehrenreich, Nicolai
Køster, Becky Inkster, Olaf B. Paulson, Lars V. Kessing, Arnold Skimminge, Hartwig R. Siebner
Affiliations: KWM, MV, NK, LVK: Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University
Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Emails: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
HE: Clinical Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Email:
JM, AS, HRS: Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital
Hvidovre, Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
HRS: Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg
BI: Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Email:
OBP: Neurobiological Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Email:
Corresponding author: Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen,
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Email:
Key words: Bipolar disorder, treatment-resistant depression, erythropoietin, hippocampus,
cognition, MRI
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 2
Word count: Abstract: 248/ Article body (excl. abstract, acknowledgments, financial disclosures,
legends and references): 3,995
Figures/ tables: 2/ 1
Supplementary information: 2
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 3
Abstract
Objective
Persistent cognitive dysfunction in depression and bipolar disorder (BD) impedes patients’
functional recovery. Erythropoietin (EPO) increases neuroplasticity and reduces cognitive
difficulties in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and remitted BD. This magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) study assessed the neuroanatomical basis for these effects.
Methods
Patients with TRD who were moderately depressed or BD in partial remission were randomized to
8 weekly EPO (40,000 IU) or saline infusions in a double-blind, parallel–group design. Patients
underwent MRI, memory assessment with the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and mood
ratings with the Beck Depression Inventory, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Young Mania
Rating Scale at baseline and week 14. Hippocampus segmentation and analysis of hippocampal
volume, shape and gray matter density were conducted FMRIB Software Library (FSL) tools.
Memory change was analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of covariance adjusted for
depression symptoms, diagnosis, age and gender.
Results
84 patients were randomized; 1 patient withdrew and data collection was incomplete for 14; data
was thus analyzed for 69 patients (EPO: N = 35, saline: N = 34). Compared with saline, EPO was
associated mood-independent memory improvement and reversal of brain matter loss in the left
hippocampal CA1-3 and subiculum. Using the entire sample, memory improvement was associated
with subfield hippocampal volume increase independent of mood change.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 4
Conclusions
EPO-associated memory improvement in TRD and BD may be mediated by reversal of brain matter
loss in a subfield of the left hippocampus. EPO may provide therapeutic option for patients with
mood disorders who have impaired neuroplasticity and cognition.
Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00916552.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 5
Introduction
Unipolar depression (UD) and bipolar disorder (BD) are chronic, recurrent and severe mental
disorders that cost an estimated €113 billion in Europe and $128 billion in the United States, of
which reduced workforce performance accounts for 60-80% of the expenditures (1;2). Cognitive
dysfunction is a core feature of mood disorders that often persists in remission and impedes
workforce performance (3;4). Although pharmacological treatments indirectly alleviate patients’
cognitive deficits by decreasing mood symptoms, no treatment so far has shown direct pro-
cognitive effects (5). Novel treatments that directly enhance cognitive dysfunction in mood
disorders should improve patients’ work capacity and reduce societal costs of these disorders.
Converging evidence from preclinical studies, neuroimaging studies and post-mortem studies of
patients with mood disorders suggest that cognitive dysfunction arises from disruption of
neuroplasticity and structural changes in brain regions including the hippocampus. Magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) of UD and BD in depressed and remitted phases and post-mortem
immunohistochemical studies have revealed reduction in overall hippocampal volume (6;7) and
volumetric shrinkage in hippocampal subregions including the dentate gyrus (DG), cornu ammonis
(CA1–3) and subiculum (8-11). Preclinical studies suggest that the hippocampal volume reduction
is caused by dendritic retraction in the CA1-3 and DG, CA3 pyramidal cell death and suppression
of DG neurogenesis due to glucocorticoid overexposure (12-14). In keeping with this, post-mortem
examination of hippocampi of depressed individuals has revealed loss of dendritic branching,
dendritic spine complexity and glia (15;16), although no substantial neural atrophy or suppressed
DG neurogenesis have been observed (11;13). Together these findings support the idea that direct
upregulation of neuroplasticity might be a fruitful approach for the treatment of cognitive
dysfunction in mood disorders.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 6
Erythropoietin (EPO) has neurotrophic properties and is a promising treatment for cognitive
dysfunction in mood disorders. Endogenous EPO in the brain mediates neuroprotection and
neurodevelopment and plays a key role in cognitive functioning (17). Systemically administered
EPO penetrates the blood-brain barrier, has neuroprotective and neurotrophic actions, and produces
cognitive enhancement in animal models of neural injury, neurodegenerative conditions and
depression (17;18). These effects are mediated through activation of anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidant and
anti-inflammatory signaling in neurons, glial and cerebrovascular endothelial cells, and promotion
of dendritic sprouting, neurogenesis, hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and
long-term potentiation (17-19). Translational studies in schizophrenia and multiple sclerosis have
demonstrated that 12 weekly EPO treatments produces consistent and long-lasting enhancement of
cognitive functioning (20;21).
We have shown that single EPO versus saline administration improves neurocognitive measures of
memory and executive function and produces antidepressant-like effects in healthy and depressed
individuals independent of change in red blood cells or mood symptoms (for review see (22)).
These findings motivated us to conduct a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating
the effects of 8 weekly doses of EPO on cognitive function and mood in TRD (23) and partially
remitted BD (24). EPO produced robust, mood-independent enhancement of verbal memory in
TRD (23) and of complex cognitive processing across attention, memory and executive function in
BD (24) as compared to saline. These cognitive effects of EPO were independent of changes in
mood symptoms and were sustained after red blood cell normalization, suggesting that they
reflected direct neurobiological actions.
The present prospective MRI investigation of 69 patients with pre- and post-treatment scans from
the above trial (23;24) aimed to assess the neuroanatomical underpinnings of the EPO-associated
improvement in cognitive function. MRI assessments in the EPO-schizophrenia trial (20) revealed
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 7
that EPO prevented gray matter loss in regions typically affected in schizophrenia, including the
hippocampus and fronto-parietal regions (25). Given the evidence for hippocampal volume
reduction in both UD and BD, we hypothesized that EPO treatment would increase total or sub-
regional hippocampal volume, and that this increase would be associated with improved verbal
memory.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 8
Methods and materials
Study design and participants
This report is based on a previously reported double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study
(23;24). In brief, patients, 18-65 years of age, were recruited through Clinic for Affective Disorders,
Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, and by advertisement on relevant websites, and screened with
Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) to confirm ICD-10 diagnosis.
Eligible patients had a diagnosis of major depression and fulfilled the criteria for TRD based on
assessment of their medical treatment history with the Treatment Response to Antidepressants
Questionnaire (TRAQ) (for details description see (23)) with current moderate depression
(Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-items (HDRS-17) score >17) or BD in partial remission
(HDRS-17 and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores <14) with moderate to severe cognitive
difficulties according to the Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) (score >4
on >2 domains). For extensive description of screening procedure, exclusion criteria and safety
precautions see (23;24). The study was approved by the local ethics committee, Danish Medicines
Agency, and Danish Data Agency, and was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (no. NCT00916552).
After complete description of the study to the participants, written informed consent was obtained.
Randomization and masking
Block randomization was performed with stratification for age (< or >35 years) and gender.
Outcome assessors were blinded to patients’ group assignment (EPO/saline) throughout the study
period and data analysis (for description of blinding procedures see (23;24)). The Good Clinical
Practice unit at Copenhagen University Hospital (www.gcp-enhed.dk/kbh) monitored that blinding
was maintained.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 9
Procedures
Patients were randomized to receive 8 weekly intravenous infusions of EPO (Eprex; 40,000 IU;
Janssen-Cilag) or saline (NaCl 0.9%) at the Clinic for Affective Disorders, Psychiatric Centre
Copenhagen. Cognitive function was investigated at weeks 1 (baseline), 9 (1 week post-treatment),
and 14 (6 weeks follow-up) with a neuropsychological test battery including verbal memory
measured with Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). To minimize learning effects on this
test we administered two alternate versions of the RAVLT at baseline and week 14 in a counter-
balanced fashion (24). MRI was performed at baseline and week 14 when hematological parameters
were expected to have normalized in the EPO group. Blood tests were taken at a weekly basis from
baseline to week 10 (2 weeks after treatment completion) and again in week 14. Mood symptoms
were assessed at weeks 1, 5, 9, and 14 with the Beck Depression Inventory 21-items (BDI-21),
HDRS-17, and for patient with BD also with the YMRS.
Data analysis
Behavioral analyses
The effect of EPO versus saline on verbal memory, reflected by RAVLT total recall, was examined
with ANCOVA adjusted for age, gender, diagnosis and change in depression symptoms. To
elucidate the functional implications of structural changes in the hippocampus, multiple regression
analysis was performed with verbal memory as the dependent variable and structural hippocampal
change, treatment group, age, gender, diagnosis and depression symptoms as predictive variables.
These statistical analyses were performed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (version
19 by IBM).
Structural brain imaging
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 10
We acquired a high-resolution 3-dimensional (3-D) T1-weighted MRI data set of the brain using a
magnetization-prepared rapid-gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence with whole-brain coverage (echo
time 3.04 ms, repetition time 1550 ms, inversion time 800 ms, flip angle 9°, field of view 256 mm,
matrix 256 × 256, 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 voxels, 192 slices). We used a Magnetom Trio 3-T scanner with
an 8-channel head coil (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The FSL software package (version 5.0.5;
http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/) was used for image analyses.
Segmentation of the hippocampus
The FMRIB's Integrated Registration and Segmentation Tool (FIRST) (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/)
was used for image segmentation and registration of the hippocampus. FIRST employs a Bayesian
probabilistic approach to segment subcortical structures using shape and appearance. In brief,
surface shape models were obtained from a database of manually segmented T1 weighted MR
images and shape and intensity were modeled jointly along the surface normals using a multivariate
Gaussian point distribution model. The model was fitted by maximizing the probability of shape
given intensity, thus incorporating prior information regarding intensity, shape and the relationship
between the two. The native output of FIRST is a surface mesh and in the conversion to voxel data
there is uncertainty as to whether the voxels that the surface passes through belong to the
structure. To correct for this, the partial volume (boundary) voxels were independently thresholded
based on the mean and variance calculated from the interior voxels (26). The total volume of the left
and right hippocampus was extracted and calculated at each time point and treatment-related
changes in hippocampal volume were assessed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusting
for diagnosis, age, and gender in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 19 by
IBM).
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 11
Analysis of regional shape changes in the hippocampal formation
Regional volume changes in hippocampal subregions over time were analyzed using FSL vertex
(shape) analysis. Differences in hippocampal shape over time as well as the direction of such local
shape changes were directly assessed in the meshes on a vertex-by-vertex basis. To this end, the
vertex locations from each subject at each time point were projected onto the surface normal of the
average shape provided by FIRST. The projections from different time points were then subtracted
(follow-up minus baseline) to create maps of hippocampus surface displacement for each subject
over time (with positive values indicating expansion). At the group level, these surface
displacement maps were then subjected to a voxelwise analysis in FSL with RANDOMISE, using a
general linear model with group and diagnosis as regressors and 5000 permutations. For those
hippocampal subfields where RANDOMISE revealed significant changes in surface displacement
between groups (at p < .05, FWE-corrected at a cluster level), mean displacements values were
extracted and examined in SPSS.
Voxel-based morphometry
In addition to the shape analysis of hippocampal subregions, we performed voxel based
morphometry with the FSL-VBM tool using an optimized VBM protocol (27). Structural images
from each time point were processed independently, and the within-subject changes were examined
subsequently in the statistical analysis. Pre-processing steps included extraction of the brain, gray
matter segmentation, and registration of the segmented brain maps onto the MNI 152 standard
space using non-linear registration. The resulting gray-matter segmentations were averaged and
flipped along the x-axis to create a left-right symmetric, study-specific gray matter template. All
native gray matter images were then non-linearly registered to this template and modulated for local
expansion (or contraction) due to the non-linear component of the spatial transformation.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 12
Modulated gray matter images from baseline and follow-up were then subtracted to quantify
changes over time. The images of the gray matter differences were smoothed with an isotropic
Gaussian kernel with a sigma of 3 mm. For left and right hippocampi, voxelwise general linear
model analysis was applied to test for time-dependent differences in hippocampal gray matter
density between groups using permutation-based non-parametric testing, correcting for multiple
comparisons across each hippocampus. The hippocampal regions were defined using the Harvard-
Oxford subcortical structural atlas. An exploratory whole-brain comparison of gray matter
difference images over time was also performed, using permutation-based non-parametric testing,
correcting for multiple comparisons across the whole brain. Statistical threshold was set at p < .05,
FWE-corrected at a cluster level.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 13
Results
Patient flow and characteristics
Table 1 and the CONSORT chart in the supplementary material display patient flow and
characteristics, respectively. Of the 84 patients were randomized to EPO (N = 42) or saline (N =
42), 1 patient withdrew at baseline and data collection was incomplete for 14 (for details see the
CONSORT chart in the supplementary material). 6 EPO-treated patients (3 TRD, 3 BD) were
discontinued from their infusions between weeks 5-7 due to increased thrombocyte counts (> 4x109/
L) but continued all assessments. Baseline and follow-up data was thus available and analyzed for
69 patients (EPO: N = 35 [16 TRD, 19 BD]; Saline: N = 34 [17 TRD, 17 BD]). Groups were well
matched on baseline characteristics (p > .22) (Table 1).
EPO induces regional changes in hippocampal shape
At baseline, left and right hippocampal surface showed no shape differences between EPO and
saline groups (p < .05, FWE-corrected at a cluster level). Shape analysis of left hippocampus
yielded a subfield-specific volume increase in the CA1-3 region extending into the subiculum in
EPO versus saline-treated patients (F = 16.50, FWE-corrected p = 0.0188) (see hippocampal
subfield in Figure 1.A). Post-hoc comparisons within each group revealed that this effect was driven
by a relative expansion of CA1-3 region/subiculum in EPO-treated patients (t = 3.64, df = 34, p =
.001) and a shrinkage in those given saline (t = -2.80, df = 33, p = .008) (see Figure 1.B). The sub-
regional hippocampal volume change was unrelated to changes in mood symptoms (BDI-21 scores)
in the EPO group and across all patients (EPO: r(34)=-.27, p = .12); whole cohort: r(68) = -.04, p =
.74).
There was no effect of EPO versus saline on change in right hippocampal shape at p < .05, FWE-
corrected at a cluster level. Exploratory analysis of right hippocampal shape with a lowered
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 14
threshold of p < .10, FWE-corrected at a cluster level, also showed no trend towards an effect of
EPO versus saline.
No effect of EPO on total hippocampal volume or regional gray matter intensity
There were no baseline differences in total volume of the left or right hippocampi between groups
(p > .79; see Table 1) or any overall hippocampal volume changes over time (p > .34). ANCOVA
adjusted for age, gender and diagnosis revealed a general effect of gender, with larger hippocampal
volume in women (left: F(1,64) = 10.77, p = .002; right: F(1,64) = 14.52, p < .001) and a trend
towards smaller volume in BD versus TRD (left: F(1,64) = 3.57, p = .064; right: F(1,64) = 2.93, p =
.092). However, there was no effect of EPO versus saline on total volume change in the left or right
hippocampus (ANCOVA adjusted for age, gender and diagnosis: p > .13), also not when analyzing
the treatment effects within each patient group (TRD/ BD) separately (p > .33).
VBM analysis revealed no between-group differences in gray matter density in left or right
hippocampus at baseline and no effects of EPO versus saline on change in total hippocampal gray
matter density (p < .05, FWE-corrected at a cluster level and adjusted for diagnosis). Exploratory
whole-brain analysis also revealed no difference between groups in cortical gray matter density
change over time (p < .05, FWE-corrected at a cluster level and adjusted for diagnosis).
Increased left hippocampal subfield volume is associated with improved verbal memory
EPO improved RAVLT total recall from baseline to week 14 compared with saline independent of
changes in mood symptoms (ANCOVA adjusted for age, gender, diagnosis, and change in BDI
scores: F(1,61) = 4.49, p = .04) (see memory improvement with EPO versus saline in Figure 2.A).
Indeed, post-hoc Pearson correlations showed that verbal memory change was unrelated to changes
in mood symptoms in the EPO group (r(34) = .03, p = .88) and across all patients (r(68) = -.13, p =
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 15
.28) (see the absence of correlation between change in memory and change in mood symptoms in
Figure 2.B). The effect of EPO on verbal memory also occurred in the absence of any general
learning effects across the whole patient cohort (p = .45).
To investigate the functional relevance of the EPO-induced hippocampal volume increase, we
performed a linear regression analysis on the entire data set with verbal memory improvement as
the dependent variable and left CA1-3/ subiculum hippocampal volume change, group, age, gender,
diagnosis and change in BDI scores as the predictive variables. This revealed a significant model
(F(6,66) = 2.69, p = .02), in which sub-regional hippocampal volume increase was the only
significant predictor (Beta = 3.72, p = .006), while changes in mood symptoms and the additional
variables had no impact on verbal memory change (p > 0.25) (see relation between hippocampal
volume increase and memory improvement in Figure 1.C).
No influence of EPO related changes in hematocrit
EPO increased the hematocrit from baseline to week 9 (23;24), but this effect had tapered off before
week 14 with no between-group difference at week 14 (t = -.71, df = 67, p = .48). Accordingly,
there were no differences in relative hematocrit change from baseline to week 14 between EPO and
saline groups (F(1,67) = 2.29, p = .14). EPO-treated patients also showed no correlation between
hematocrit increase and sub-regional hippocampal volume increase (r(34) = 0.01, p = .94) or
memory improvement (r(34) = -.09, p = .61).
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 16
Discussion
This study is the first to prospectively elucidate the neuroanatomical underpinnings of the cognitive
improvement observed in EPO-treated patients with BD or TRD. The study demonstrated that EPO
treatment is associated with prevention of brain matter loss in a subfield of the left hippocampus
encompassing the CA1-3 and subiculum and improves verbal memory independent of changes in
mood. Across the whole cohort, verbal memory improvement was mediated by structural increase
in this left hippocampal subfield rather than by changes in mood symptoms. These effects of EPO
occurred in the absence of changes in total hippocampal volume or in hippocampal or whole-brain
gray matter volume.
In contrast with the EPO-treated patients, those given saline displayed discrete but significant left-
side volume reduction within the CA1-3 region and subiculum over a period of 3 months. This
observation points to disease-related processes in the CA1-3 and subiculum consistent with
evidence for hippocampal CA1-3 volume reduction in UD (10) and BD (9) as well as abnormal left
hippocampal subiculum shape in TRD (28). Conversely, chronic antidepressant treatment appears
to reverse the DG and CA1-3 volume reduction in UD (10) and lithium increases overall
hippocampal volume in BD (29). The ability of EPO to not only prevent shrinkage but also produce
direct volume increase in the left hippocampal CA1-3 and subiculum suggests that EPO can
mitigate disease-related hippocampal volume reduction similar to existing treatments of mood
disorders. In contrast, we found no effect of EPO on DG volume despite the ability of EPO to
enhance neurogenesis (17). A potential explanation is that all patients were on stabile antidepressant
or mood stabilizing treatment which could have obscured an EPO effect on DG volume reduction
(10). Future studies examining the effects of EPO versus saline effects in drug-free patients could
help resolve this question, although such investigation may be difficult to conduct.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 17
Several neurobiological mechanisms may underlie the CA1-3 and subiculum volume increase in
EPO versus saline-treated patients. Although EPO increased hematocrit during the active treatment
phase, red blood cells were normalized at the time of the follow-up scan (6 weeks after treatment
completion). This suggests that the EPO-associated hippocampal volume increase was unrelated to
unspecific changes in cerebral blood-flow. Hippocampal volume increase after long-term
antidepressant or mood-stabilizing treatment (10;29) may be mediated by reversal of dendritic spine
and glia loss and dendritic retraction in the DG and CA (30-32) and increased hippocampal nerve
growth factor (NGF), BDNF (33;34) and neurogenesis (35), respectively. The EPO-associated
increase in CA1-3 volume could reflect similar neurotrophic mechanisms given the ability of EPO
to enhance hippocampal BDNF, neurite growth and spine density (17;36). A high density of
glucocorticoid binding sites makes the subiculum particular vulnerability to stress (37) and could
explain the abnormalities in this hippocampal subfield in UD (11;28). The reversal of subiculum
shrinkage in EPO-treated patients may thus reflect neuroprotection from glucocorticoid-induced
atrophy. Another putative mechanism of EPO underlying the hippocampal effect is inhibition of
glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3β) (38), a key activator of cell death that is involved in
mood disorders, hippocampal volume and neuroplasticity (39). Taken together, multiple
neurobiological actions may either alone or in orchestra contribute to the effects of EPO on
hippocampus and memory performance.
Interestingly, the EPO-associated sub-regional volume increase was confined to the left
hippocampus. The neurobiological mechanism for this unilateral effect is unclear. Nevertheless, the
finding is consistent with selective left hippocampal volume increase in UD after 3 years
antidepressant drug treatment (40) and in schizophrenia after 12 weeks EPO-treatment (25). In
contrast with the EPO-schizophrenia study, we observed no effects of EPO on total gray matter
volume in the hippocampus or across cortical regions. This discrepancy may be explained by
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 18
preferential neuroprotective effects of EPO in areas marked by neural degeneration, which is more
wide-spread in schizophrenia, or – alternatively - by the 4 weeks shorter treatment in the present
study.
The study had a large sample size (N = 69) in comparison with previous MRI investigations of EPO
treatment (25) or of subfield hippocampal volume in UD (10) and BD (9). In comparison, MRI
studies of mood disorders often involve 20-40 patients (and an equal number of healthy controls) in
cross-sectional designs (9;10), and 10-30 patients in longitudinal designs (29;40). In addition, the
longitudinal study design rendered it possible to capture intra-individual structural changes in
response to EPO versus saline treatment. Finally, our assessment of the verbal memory in parallel
with the structural hippocampal measures enabled insight into the functional implications of the
EPO-associated increase in subfield hippocampal volume. It is a potential limitation that our cohort
included both patients with TRD and BD, since these mood disorders may involve differential
although partially overlapping pathogenic processes. However, disruption of neuroplasticity,
hippocampal volume reduction and cognitive deficits are common biological targets in these
disorders and the ability of EPO to enhance cognition and neuroprotection has been observed across
a range of different brain disorders (20;21;23;24). Nevertheless, there was an equal distribution of
patients with TRD and BD in the EPO and saline groups, and analyses were adjusted for patients’
diagnosis. We used three complementary methods which enabled us to capture different aspects of
hippocampal volume changes triggered by EPO treatment: FSL vertex analysis and FIRST were
used to investigate our hypothesis that EPO would increase sub-regional or total hippocampal
volume, respectively, while VBM was used to elucidate the neurobiological mechanisms of such
changes. We did not adjust the statistical threshold in the vertex analysis for the two hypotheses
regarding EPO-associated hippocampal volume change. The rationale for this was that the vertex
analysis of subfield hippocampal volume change is itself statistically highly conservative involving
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 19
FWE-correction, which rendered the existence of false positives unlikely. However, even if we had
corrected the statistical threshold for the two comparisons, the hippocampal effect on sub-regional
hippocampal volume would have remained significant (p = 0.0188 < 0.025). Despite the EPO-
associated volume increase in the left hippocampal CA1-3 and subiculum, we observed no
corresponding change in total hippocampal volume or overall hippocampal gray matter volume.
Nevertheless, we consider the finding significant for the following reasons: First, the EPO-
associated surface expansion in the left hippocampal CA1-3/subiculum is opposite to the effects of
stress and consistent with the neurobiological effects of EPO in animal models and the left-
lateralized hippocampal effects in schizophrenia. Second, the vertex analysis estimates changes in
sub-regional hippocampal volume by the relative displacements in hippocampal surface, which is a
more sensitive measure of structural hippocampal change than total hippocampal volume or total
gray matter volume (41). In particular, direct comparisons of these techniques revealed that
localized disease-related structural change in early Parkinson’s disease was undetectable with VBM
and overall regional volume, but could be identified with vertex shape analysis. (41). Indeed, FIRST
is limited by ambiguity in the demarcation of the hippocampus versus surrounding structures (42),
while VBM is limited by ambiguous interpretability with regards to gray matter microstructure, less
precise image registration, and susceptibility to confounding effects of large anatomical differences
in other parts of the brain (43). Notably, we cannot therefore rule out that the EPO-associated
increase in sub-regional hippocampal volume could be related to increase in sub-regional gray
matter. Finally, the three methods reflect different structural measures (subfield surface
displacements, total volume and total gray matter volume, respectively). Therefore, change in one
of these measures would not necessarily be expected to be accompanied by changes in the other
measures.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 20
In conclusion, the study shows that EPO treatment of patients with mood disorders prevents brain
matter loss in the left hippocampal CA1-3 and subiculum and improves verbal memory.
Hippocampal subfield volume increase was associated with improvement of verbal memory
independent of changes in mood. The findings are consistent with the ability of EPO to enhance
neuroplasticity and memory in animal studies and highlight EPO as a therapeutic option for patients
with mood disorders who have impaired neuroplasticity and cognition.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 21
Acknowledgements
The study was funded by the Danish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Higher Education, Novo
Nordisk Foundation, Beckett Fonden, and Savværksejer Juhl’s Mindefond. The sponsors had no
role in the planning or conduct of the study or in the interpretation of the results.
We would like to thank A. John Rush MD, Professor Emeritus, National University of Singapore,
and Martin B. Jørgensen, Professor, MD, DMsc, for their valuable feedback on the manuscript,
David Cole, PhD, for statistical advice regarding the FSL analyses, and Nikolai V. Malykhin, MD,
PhD, for help with determining the hippocampal subfields that were increased by EPO versus
saline. We also thank the study nurses, Susanne Sander and Hanne Nikolajsen for their work with
logistical planning and running the trial. Professor Siebner was supported by a Grant of Excellence
on the control of actions “ContAct” from Lundbeck Foundation (R59 A5399). The Simon Spies
Foundation is acknowledged for donation of the Siemens Trio Scanner. The Lundbeck Foundation
has provided half of Dr Miskowiak’s post-doctorate salary at the Psychiatric Center Copenhagen
(2012–2015) for her to do full-time research in this period.
The findings in this paper were presented orally at the American Society for Clinical
Psychopharmacology (ASCP) meeting, Hollywood, Florida, 16-19 June 2014.
Financial disclosures
KWM reports having received consultancy fees from Lundbeck. MV discloses consultancy fees
from Eli Lilly, Lundbeck; Servier and Astra Zeneca. HE resports has submitted / holds user patents
for EPO in stroke, schizophrenia, and MS. OBP is a member of the board of directors of the Elsass
Foundation. LVK reports having been a consultant for Lundbeck, AstraZeneca and Servier within
the last 3 years. HRS discloses honoraria as reviewing editor for Neuroimage, as speaker for Biogen
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 22
Idec Denmark A/S, and scientific advisor for Lundbeck within the past 3 years. All other authors
report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 23
References
(1) Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Wittchen HU, Jonsson B (2012): The economic cost
of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol 19(1): 155-162.
(2) Wyatt RJ, Henter I (1995): An economic evaluation of manic-depressive illness—1991. Soc
Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 30(5): 213-219.
(3) Jaeger J, Berns S, Uzelac S, Davis-Conway S. Neurocognitive deficits and disability in
major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res 2006 Nov 29;145(1):39-48.
(4) Mur M, Portella MJ, Martinez-Aran A, Pifarre J, Vieta E (2009): Influence of clinical and
neuropsychological variables on the psychosocial and occupational outcome of remitted
bipolar patients. Psychopathology 42(3): 148-156.
(5) Dias VV, Balanza-Martinez V, Soeiro-de-Souza MG, Moreno RA, Figueira ML, Machado-
Vieira R, et al. (2012): Pharmacological approaches in bipolar disorders and the impact on
cognition: a critical overview. Acta Psychiatr Scand 126(5): 315-331.
(6) Canales-Rodriguez EJ, Pomarol-Clotet E, Radua J, Sarro S, Alonso-Lana S, del Mar BC, et
al. (2014): Structural Abnormalities in Bipolar Euthymia: A Multicontrast Molecular
Diffusion Imaging Study. Biol Psychiatry 76(3): 239-248.
(7) McKinnon MC, Yucel K, Nazarov A, MacQueen GM (2009): A meta-analysis examining
clinical predictors of hippocampal volume in patients with major depressive disorder. J
Psychiatry Neurosci 34(1): 41-54.
(8) Cole J, Toga AW, Hojatkashani C, Thompson P, Costafreda SG, Cleare AJ, et al. (2010):
Subregional hippocampal deformations in major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 126(1-
2): 272-277.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 24
(9) Elvsashagen T, Westlye LT, Boen E, Hol PK, Andersson S, Andreassen OA, et al. (2013):
Evidence for reduced dentate gyrus and fimbria volume in bipolar II disorder. Bipolar
Disord 15(2): 167-176.
(10) Huang Y, Coupland NJ, Lebel RM, Carter R, Seres P, Wilman AH, et al. (2013): Structural
changes in hippocampal subfields in major depressive disorder: a high-field magnetic
resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry;74(1):62-8.
(11) Lucassen PJ, Muller MB, Holsboer F, Bauer J, Holtrop A, Wouda J, et al. (2001):
Hippocampal apoptosis in major depression is a minor event and absent from subareas at
risk for glucocorticoid overexposure. Am J Pathol 158(2): 453-468.
(12) Alfarez DN, Karst H, Velzing EH, Joels M, Krugers HJ (2008): Opposite effects of
glucocorticoid receptor activation on hippocampal CA1 dendritic complexity in chronically
stressed and handled animals. Hippocampus 18(1): 20-28.
(13) Czeh B, Lucassen PJ (2007): What causes the hippocampal volume decrease in depression?
Are neurogenesis, glial changes and apoptosis implicated? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin
Neurosci 257(5): 250-260.
(14) Hageman I, Nielsen M, Wortwein G, Diemer NH, Jorgensen MB (2008): Electroconvulsive
stimulations prevent stress-induced morphological changes in the hippocampus. Stress
11(4): 282-289.
(15) Cobb JA, Simpson J, Mahajan GJ, Overholser JC, Jurjus GJ, Dieter L, et al. (2013):
Hippocampal volume and total cell numbers in major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res
47(3): 299-306.
(16) Stockmeier CA, Rajkowska G (2004): Cellular abnormalities in depression: evidence from
postmortem brain tissue. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 6(2): 185-197.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 25
(17) Sargin D, Friedrichs H, El-Kordi A, Ehrenreich H (2010): Erythropoietin as neuroprotective
and neuroregenerative treatment strategy: comprehensive overview of 12 years of preclinical
and clinical research. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 24(4): 573-594.
(18) Girgenti MJ, Hunsberger J, Duman CH, Sathyanesan M, Terwilliger R, Newton SS (2009):
Erythropoietin induction by electroconvulsive seizure, gene regulation, and antidepressant-
like behavioral effects. Biol Psychiatry 66(3): 267-274.
(19) Adamcio B, Sargin D, Stradomska A, Medrihan L, Gertler C, Theis F, et al. (2008):
Erythropoietin enhances hippocampal long-term potentiation and memory. BMC Biol: 37.
(20) Ehrenreich H, Hinze-Selch D, Stawicki S, Aust C, Knolle-Veentjer S, Wilms S, et al.
(2007): Improvement of cognitive functions in chronic schizophrenic patients by
recombinant human erythropoietin. Mol Psychiatry 12(2): 206-220.
(21) Ehrenreich H, Fischer B, Norra C, Schellenberger F, Stender N, Stiefel M, et al. (2007):
Exploring recombinant human erythropoietin in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis.
Brain 130(10): 2577-2588.
(22) Miskowiak KW, Vinberg M, Harmer CJ, Ehrenreich H, Kessing LV (2012): Erythropoietin:
a candidate treatment for mood symptoms and memory dysfunction in depression.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) 219(3): 687-698.
(23) Miskowiak KW, Vinberg M, Christensen EM, Bukh JD, Harmer CJ, Ehrenreich H, et al.
(2014): Recombinant Human Erythropoietin for Treating Treatment-Resistant Depression:
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Trial.
Neuropsychopharmacology 39(6): 1399-1408.
(24) Miskowiak K, Ehrenreich H, Christensen EM, Kessing LV, Vinberg M. (2014):
Recombinant human erythropoietin to target cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: A
double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. J Clin Psychiatry (in press)
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 26
(25) Wustenberg T, Begemann M, Bartels C, Gefeller O, Stawicki S, Hinze-Selch D, et al.
(2011): Recombinant human erythropoietin delays loss of gray matter in chronic
schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 16(1): 26-36.
(26) Patenaude B, Smith SM, Kennedy DN, Jenkinson M (2011): A Bayesian model of shape
and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation. Neuroimage 56(3): 907-922.
(27) Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, et
al. (2004): Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as
FSL. Neuroimage 23(1): S208-S219.
(28) Tae WS, Kim SS, Lee KU, Nam EC, Choi JW, Park JI (2011): Hippocampal shape
deformation in female patients with unremitting major depressive disorder. AJNR Am J
Neuroradiol 32(4): 671-676.
(29) Yucel K, McKinnon MC, Taylor VH, Macdonald K, Alda M, Young LT, et al. (2007):
Bilateral hippocampal volume increases after long-term lithium treatment in patients with
bipolar disorder: a longitudinal MRI study. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 195(3): 357-367.
(30) Bessa JM, Ferreira D, Melo I, Marques F, Cerqueira JJ, Palha JA, et al. (2009): The mood-
improving actions of antidepressants do not depend on neurogenesis but are associated with
neuronal remodeling. Mol Psychiatry 14(8): 764-773.
(31) Hajszan T, Dow A, Warner-Schmidt JL, Szigeti-Buck K, Sallam NL, Parducz A, et al.
(2009): Remodeling of hippocampal spine synapses in the rat learned helplessness model of
depression. Biol Psychiatry 65(5): 392-400.
(32) Magarinos AM, Deslandes A, McEwen BS (1999): Effects of antidepressants and
benzodiazepine treatments on the dendritic structure of CA3 pyramidal neurons after
chronic stress. Eur J Pharmacol 371(2-3): 113-122.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 27
(33) Frey BN, Andreazza AC, Rosa AR, Martins MR, Valvassori SS, Reus GZ, et al. (2006):
Lithium increases nerve growth factor levels in the rat hippocampus in an animal model of
mania. Behav Pharmacol 17(4): 311-318.
(34) Fukumoto T, Morinobu S, Okamoto Y, Kagaya A, Yamawaki S. (2001): Chronic lithium
treatment increases the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the rat brain.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) 158(1): 100-106.
(35) Chen G, Rajkowska G, Du F, Seraji-Bozorgzad N, Manji HK (2000): Enhancement of
hippocampal neurogenesis by lithium. J Neurochem 75(4): 1729-1734.
(36) Oh DH, Lee IY, Choi M, Kim SH, Son H (2012): Comparison of Neurite Outgrowth
Induced by Erythropoietin (EPO) and Carbamylated Erythropoietin (CEPO) in Hippocampal
Neural Progenitor Cells. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 16(4): 281-285.
(37) Sarrieau A, Dussaillant M, Agid F, Philibert D, Agid Y, Rostene W (1986):
Autoradiographic localization of glucocorticosteroid and progesterone binding sites in the
human post-mortem brain. J Steroid Biochem 25(5B): 717-721.
(38) Ge XH, Zhu GJ, Geng DQ, Zhang ZJ, Liu CF (2012): Erythropoietin attenuates 6-
hydroxydopamine-induced apoptosis via glycogen synthase kinase 3beta-mediated
mitochondrial translocation of Bax in PC12 cells. Neurol Sci 33(6): 1249-1256.
(39) Inkster B, Nichols TE, Saemann PG, Auer DP, Holsboer F, Muglia P, et al. (2009):
Association of GSK3beta polymorphisms with brain structural changes in major depressive
disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 66(7): 721-728.
(40) Frodl T, Jager M, Smajstrlova I, Born C, Bottlender R, Palladino T, et al. (2008): Effect of
hippocampal and amygdala volumes on clinical outcomes in major depression: a 3-year
prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. J Psychiatry Neurosci 33(5): 423-430.
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 28
(41) Menke RA, Szewczyk-Krolikowski K, Jbabdi S, Jenkinson M, Talbot K, Mackay CE, et al.
(2014): Comprehensive morphometry of subcortical grey matter structures in early-stage
Parkinson's disease. Hum Brain Mapp 35(4):1681-1690.
(42) Morey RA, Petty CM, Xu Y, Hayes JP, Wagner HR 2nd, Lewis DV, et al. (2009): A
comparison of automated segmentation and manual tracing for quantifying hippocampal and
amygdala volumes. Neuroimage 45(3):855-866.
(43) Mechelli A, Price CJ, Friston KJ, Ashburner J (2005): Voxel-Based Morphometry of the Human Brain:
Methods and Applications. Current Medical Imaging Reviews 1 (1): 1-9
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 29
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
EPO (N = 35)
Saline (N = 34)
p-value
Diagnosis (no. BD/TRD) 19/16 17/17
Age, Mean (SD) 40 (10) 43 (12) 0.23
Gender (no. women) 24 23
Education, Mean (SD) 15 (4) 15 (3) 0.55
BDI baseline, Mean (SD) 26 (12) 24 (11) 0.40
HDRS baseline, Mean (SD) 14 (7) 14 (7) 0.64
YMS baseline, Mean (SD) 3 (3) 2 (2) 0.45
No. prior depressions, Mean (SD) 6 (5) 5 (4) 0.40
No. prior (hypo)manias, Mean (SD) 5 (6) 4 (4) 0.79
Bipolar subtype (no. of type II) 11 9
BMI, Mean (SD) 24 (3) 25 (3) 0.22
Total hippocampal volume at baseline
Left 5072 (483) 5036 (622) 0.79
Right 5205 (546) 5182 (518) 0.86
Dr Kamilla Miskowiak 30
Figure legend 1.a EPO reduces brain matter loss in a subfield of the left hippocampus corresponding to
CA1-3 and subiculum, as reflected by expansion in mean vertex location within this subfield in EPO versus
saline treated patients. In particular, Y = 100 and Y = 97 (hippocampus body) correspond to the subiculum
and CA2-3; Y = 103, Y = 105, and Y = 107 (hippocampus head) correspond to the subiculum and CA1-3;
and Y=94 (hippocampus tail) may be both CA and DG (Malykhin, personal communication, March 2014).
1.b. Mean hippocampal surface displacement in millimeters (reflected by change in mean vertex location) in
the left hippocampal CA1-3 and subiculum revealed expansion in the EPO-treated patients (p = .001) and
shrinkage in those given saline patients from baseline to week 14 (p = .008). 1.c. Linear relation between
subfield hippocampal volume change and change in verbal memory; there was a highly significant positive
correlation across all patients (r(68) = .40, p = .001) as well as in the EPO group (r(34) = .46, p = .005).
Figure legend 2.a. Verbal memory improvement as reflected by change in RAVLT total scores in response
to EPO (N = 35) versus saline (N = 34). The dotted line denotes the mean RAVLT total recall score of
healthy, age-matched (40-49 years) individuals of average intelligence. Mean and s.e.m are presented. 2.b.
Linear relation between change in mood symptoms (BDI-21 scores) and verbal memory (RAVLT total
score) change in the EPO group (N = 35); there was no correlation in the EPO group (r(34) = 0.03, p = .88)
or across all patients (r(68) = -.13, p = .28).
Y=94 Y=97
Y=100 Y=103
Y=105 Y=107
TOP BOTTOM
CA1-3 Subiculum
LEFT HIPPOCAMPUS A
B C
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-0.5 -0.3 -0.1 0.1 0.3
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
Saline EPO
∆ Subfield hippocampal volume
∆ Memory ∆ Subfield hippocampal volume