Digital Textbook Program in Malaysia: Lessonsfrom South Korea

M. A. Hamedi1 • S. M. Ezaleila1

� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Abstract The popularity of e-book led to the need to re-evaluate of education

system that is traditionally based on the printed textbooks. While the use of printed

books have a lot of constraints in terms of cost and efficacy in learning, many

studies highlight the advantages of digital textbooks. As a learning medium of the

21st century, digital textbooks are said to be able to solve various problems of

teaching and learning. Malaysia does not want to miss in exploring the possibility of

making digital textbooks as a medium of teaching and learning for the future. As a

result, a digital textbook program is launched in 2014, although many stakeholders

in education such as teachers, students, parents, publishers and officers are not ready

while the infrastructure is generally incomplete.

Keywords E-textbook � Digital textbook � Teaching and learning �Learning system

Introduction

The education system is facing a major challenge in adapting to the technological

developments of the 21st century. This is the era in which technology affects all

activities of our lives, especially the younger generation who were born post-

Internet. In the United States, educational leadership from government and private

institutions have raised their concern about the irrelevance of education today.

According to them, the education today is increasingly building a gap between what

is being experienced by students with what is learned by them in school. They assert

& M. A. Hamedi

hamedi@um.edu.my

1 Department of Media Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Malaya,

50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

123

Pub Res Q

DOI 10.1007/s12109-015-9425-4

that the system of teaching and educational contexts in America today is the same as

what was a century ago. The system is not able to provide students with the current

needs of the world that is increasingly centered on technology. As such, they

demanded a transformation of school system with a paradigm shift so that students

can be better prepared to enter the global labour market characterized by driving

technological change, rapid acquisition of knowledge and the increasingly fierce

global competition.

In South Korea, a country that is far ahead in the application of technology in the

education system, reforms have been carried out with the use of latest technology as

a spur. Digital textbook program was implemented in the country since 2007. By

2015, digital textbooks will completely replace printed textbooks in schools.

Digital textbooks fundamentally changed the basic instructional practice; enable

students to learn content that is tailored to their abilities and interests. Besides

maintaining the characteristics offered by the printed textbook, digital also provides

a variety of interactive functions while also providing reference books, workbooks,

dictionaries, and a variety of multimedia content such as video clips, animations and

virtual reality [8]. Furthermore, students can enjoy the digital textbooks at school or

at home, anywhere, anytime; without limitations of time or space. In other words,

digital textbooks are always alive and moving; developing and producing

knowledge, not only to the individual students, but also to others, in addition to

support and assist the teaching activities. Students can produce their own

‘‘textbook’’ while using digital textbooks by making notes, comments, marking,

tagging and improvements from the original contents.

Traditionally, education systems rely on printed materials. Because publishing

process takes time and money, printed textbooks are targeted for use in a certain

time period, for example five to 10 years. However, changes and latest development

often makes the content in textbooks become stale and irrelevant once the book is

published. As such, printed textbooks is not an effective tool to be used in

educational system, especially in the context of rapid changing in science and

technology.

Furthermore, there are no books that are physically able to bear all the necessary

information in any subjects. Digital textbooks introduced to overcome all these

constraints. With a compact storage capacity, a digital textbook can save

information from thousands of printed books. Digital textbooks can be equipped

with multimedia files, and it effectively improves the production and dissemination

of information. The text can be equipped with a variety of other media such as

video, audio, animation, games, apps, and others. With the increasing sophistication

of technology, interactive features become increasingly important component in

digital technology and this feature brings great benefits in ensuring the effectiveness

of the learning system [20].

This paper discusses the concept of digital textbooks and its characteristics. In

addition, the strengths and weaknesses of the use of digital textbooks resulting from

various studies will be presented. As a case study, the status of digital textbooks in

South Korea will be presented. Finally this paper will discuss the current state of the

implementation of digital textbook program in Malaysia.

Pub Res Q

123

Introduction to Digital Textbook

Digital textbooks are digital books or electronic books used as texts in the

classroom. Digital textbooks are also known as electronic text books or electronic

text (e-textbook or e-text). This textbook is the main component in technology-

based education reform that is now increasingly dominating the world of education

in developed countries. This electronic book acts as a text to be used in teaching

face-to-face in classrooms, and as a tool for online teaching.

Advantages of digital textbooks are often contemplated by the researchers in

educational technology. Digital textbooks can reduce costs, simplify the monitoring

tasks of student progress, and cheap and easily updated when necessary. Open

electronic textbook provides an opportunity to create free textbooks, which can be

modified, and allows teachers to create their own electronic texts for classroom use.

For this reason and also for technological and economic reasons, digital textbooks

are increasingly in preference to the more traditional textbook.

Many countries are still taking a wait and see attitude before engaging any policy

towards digital textbook in schools. Although there is no denying that digital

textbook is the path to the future of modern education technology, many countries

are still cautious, including Malaysia to determine policies towards it. However

there are countries that drastically formulate policies to explore this technology of

digital textbooks. South Korea is the leading country who wishes to use digital

textbooks completely by 2015. It aims to become explorer of digital textbook and

eventually become a leader in providing future technology and digital textbooks.

The others are the United States, driven by the commitment of the President Barrack

Obama who wants the younger generation to use digital textbooks by 2017.

The educational system of the 21st century must provide lifelong learners who

are able to process large amounts of knowledge every day. In the traditional

education system, students receive knowledge transmitted by the teacher. Thus, the

good students are those who have good listening skills, summarizing content, take

notes, and passed in the test. In contrast, in the 21st century, students need to lead

them self, react actively to solve the problem, and acts as a generator of knowledge

that should be adjusted to their own learning goals.

Current research in education is tending to give more attention to the question of

how students generate and share knowledge in an educational environment. This

self-control students (self-regulated) feature is the key to the definition of Net

generation, one more term than Y Generation who lately appear in information

technology. According to Shaffer and Kaput [55], computing media is now produces

a form of cognitive activity and a new cognitive culture. Experts argue that personal

computers, personal digital assistants, games and the Internet may replace formal

school education as a key to develop thinking skills [17, 48, 54]. Video games and

word processors may change the focus of the literary and language from reading and

writing of print based to participation in multimodal literacy spaces [17, 26, 43]. As

a result, a simple understanding of whom and how we teach are becoming

increasingly complex and complicated.

Pub Res Q

123

Furthermore new media computing requires students who have a habit of mind

which is also new, and the ability to master new skills such as programming and

algorithmic thinking [14, 47]. As such digital textbooks play a key role as a cultural

tool in the world which support of new thinking and a new cognitive culture [13].

Furthermore, in digital textbooks students control their own support by facilitating

the characteristics provided by multimedia and hypertext, such as elements of a

flexible, interactive, manipulative, constructive, active, and searchable to construct a

self- regulation learning environments. Self-control students can be characterized as

effective problem solvers and inventor’s information and manager who carry out its

activities effectively, as to identify, locate and utilize information, synthesize, and

evaluate information in an authentic learning environment.

Traditionally, the goal of education is to impart and acquire knowledge through a

curriculum framework that is stable and does not change quickly. Knowledge

acquired in school should be relevant to the work environment when they graduate.

However, this simple process of knowledge acquisition is no longer relevant in the

21st century. Students are required to build knowledge to solve problems in a world

that is increasingly based on information technology in the new century. Since the

environment in which students must function is changing, so is the goal in their

education. The question now becomes: Is the goal in education today is appropriate

to students who are confronted with unpredictable situations?

School should be able to help students hone their ability to produce, to

synthesize, and to integrate knowledge [24]. Because the goal of education has

changed, the method of education should also be revised. Before this, the goals can

be achieved by memorize, drill and practice. However, practice alone cannot

stimulate students, and no longer appropriate. Similarly to the enforcement and

punishment system that is now obsolete. With the fast-paced and constantly

changing basic education today, understanding and application of knowledge is the

key. What is needed is a method of teaching that can shape students to develop their

understanding and skills to improve their ability to apply that knowledge. This can

be achieved through participation in discussion groups, and through contextual

learning based on experience, problem-based and project-based. This is the new

approach which translates the belief of experts that digital textbooks can be a

powerful tool that can connect students with current world demands through the

Internet and multimedia.

Basic Theory of Using Digital Textbook

Most theories in learning technology are still centered on how and under what

circumstances learning can be maximized. Of course it is vital that educational

theory that can support the use of digital textbooks be identified. It is still too broad

though theories that could be geared to the specific characteristics of digital

textbooks as hypermedia, multimedia, interactive reliability, and learning self-

control is already in abundance.

One benefit of digital textbooks is its non-linear characteristic called ‘‘hyper-

text.’’ A hypertext environment provides different ways to use the content. The non-

Pub Res Q

123

linear characteristic of digital textbooks enables different individuals to interact by

using the same information through different processes. Users are free to use the

structure and sequence of reading. Even the hypertext changes the conventional

process in organizing and understanding knowledge [9, 42, 51].

Compared to traditional printed textbooks, digital textbooks allow more

flexibility in the delivery of teaching by allowing users to select hypertext links.

It offers students flexibility with their environments to explore and encourage them

to navigate. In this way, students can build their own knowledge structure with

cross-referenced on the topics that will strengthen their knowledge base. Students

still follow the set route through subject content generated by designers, but they

can also build their own path according to their respective abilities and interests

[28].

There are several studies that show the advantages of learning through

hypermedia compared to the information presented in linear [12, 16]. However it

was recognized that the non-linear presentation prowess in these studies are due to

their familiarity with hypermedia system. Jonassen [22, 23] may rightly argue that

hypermedia should facilitate learning due to its suitability to the structure of human

memory. In other words, it is connected to human nature in encoding and obtaining

information. When a student is given the freedom to move freely through

hypermedia presentation, he or she will build a pattern of personal navigation that

reflect his or her cognitive. The flexibility offered by hypermedia, Jonassen argued,

should improve learning. Differences in individual cognitive style should lead to

distinctive patterns of navigation and this will produce varies learning outcomes

[49].

Different theoretical perspectives give us several benefits of learning through

hypermedia. Some of the benefits gained from teaching from the perspective of

different theories. This perspective focuses mainly on the fact that the hypermedia

environment enables active learning, constructive, flexible, adaptive, and self-

control [1, 53]. Lawless and Brown [29] assume that when hypermedia is used as a

learning tool, the freedom to specify access information allows students to actively

control the learning process than directed by the teacher or by the textbook structure

(cf. [13]).

In addition, digital textbooks also involve learning through multimedia. Digital

textbooks are designed to facilitate the production of various multimedia such as

interactive games, videos, audio, animation, apps, 3D, and other functions. Study on

multimedia learning shows that multimedia can stimulate cognitive changes [31]

and facilitate the processing of information in learning [34, 52]. According to

Mayer’s [32] theory of multimedia learning, the ability of students to form mental

representations of external information will be enhanced if information presented

through various sensory channels and this assumption are consistent with Paivio

theory of dual coding. According to Paivio [46], two different modes are used in

multimedia to describe the contents of knowledge: verbal and non-verbal.

Therefore, in principle mode of instructional design [30, 32, 33, 38–40], the most

effective learning environment that combines knowledge representation is non-

verbal oral presentations using mixed mode. However, there are also limitations to

Pub Res Q

123

the effectiveness of multimedia, and thus emphasizes the importance of design and

format combination with the mode [45]; also see [34].

Digital textbooks are also seen in terms of interactive learning. Digital textbooks

ability to provide interactive features and feedback provide many possibilities in

learning. It is believed that the provision of interactive functions and manipulative

in multimedia will enhance students’ problem-solving skills by way of (a) encourage

the promotion of their self efficacy and (b) reduce the cognitive load involved in the

problem solving process [60, 61]. Carefully designed interactive multimedia

components will provide visibility in learning. The user can ‘‘see’’ the action

directed to them at any point options, and they can receive direct feedback about the

newly created action. They also can obtain instant information about the effects of

their actions [19, 44].

Researchers of education stressed the importance to incorporate interactive

features with feedback in learning. Despite its ability to interact with teaching

materials (behaviour), learning will not occur if the opportunity to obtain feedback

and to think (cognitive) is denied. Thus, the principle of interactivity should be

considered in incorporating the principles of counselling and thinking. For example,

new students are often frustrated and eventually take the path of trial-and-error

which is less effective when asked to find any scientific principle without guidance

[41].

There are five common types of interactive multimedia environment, namely

dialogue, controlling, manipulating, searching, and navigating. With dialogue,

students can ask questions and get answers, or can provide answers and receive

feedback. When in learning, students can get help from agents on the screen or just

click on a particular word in hypertext to obtain additional information. Interactivity

allows students to determine the pace or the order in their own learning process. For

example, they can control the speed of animation by using the command of pause or

play, or continue or forward. In addition, students can also control the structure by

using instruction such as forward and back, rewind, and so on. Interactive features

allow students to control the presentation such a set of parameters before playing a

simulation, zooming in or zooming out, or move objects around the screen.

Interactivity also allows students to assess their learning content when clicking the

menu.

Digital textbooks can also provide online assessment tool as well as learning

material support. With the assessment components provided, teachers can use

assessment data to measure whether the learning objectives were achieved or

otherwise. Formative assessment refers to activities used to help students learn [11].

Learning environment with formative assessment will be beneficial to students. A

lot of studies have concluded that integrating e-learning environment with web-

based assessment brings positive effects [18]. Zakrzewski and Bull [59] stated that

the online tests format is beneficial to students because they can make an assessment

at any time and repeatedly. Feedback can be readily obtained and thus susceptibility

improved. Besides student’s concerns may also be reduced by taking formative

assessment before they take summative test.

Bransford et al. [6] also suggested that the learning environment include

centralized assessment. Formative assessment, according to them, should be able to

Pub Res Q

123

attract the attention of students and stimulate their commitment to self-assess, to

improve the effectiveness of learning. Buchanan [7] also suggested that the Web-

based formative assessment strategies can enhance student interest in learning and

helps in getting better results.

Learning using digital textbooks requires students to control of their own. They

must make decisions on what to learn, time allocation, how to access learning

materials, and determine whether they understand or not of such material [2, 3].

Learning self-control or Self-Regulated Learning is defined as learning that involves

an understanding of a topic or domain using the strategies and goals; control and

monitor cognitive aspects, certain attitudes and motivation; and adjust the attitude to

achieve the desired goals [50]. Studies found that students need to take control of

their learning with hypermedia, including monitoring how much time is allocated to

the various representations of information and when and how to adjust the strategy

used in hypermedia environments [2, 56, 58].

Digital Textbooks in South Korea

In 2008 the South Korean government announced the government’s intention to

replace printed textbooks with electronic tablet at all public schools by 2015. This

move will enable students to download digital textbooks in a variety of platforms,

including computers, smart phones and tablets. This digital shift is part of a project

to develop ‘‘smart schools’’ across the country, namely by combining features such

as video, animation, virtual reality, and hyperlinks into the education curriculum.

Korean digital textbook program aims to develop future students-centered learning

environment in school, at home and everywhere in society. The program also wants

to establish overseas market for telecommunications equipment and mobile display

industry, expand the electronic book market, and diversify domestic digital content

now limited to games and movies. Eventually, the program wants to connect the

digital and learning gaps that hit low-income families. It also wants to encourage

changes in the industry and promote market-based paper in the online tutorials and

books [20].

The use of digital textbooks is an innovative project carefully designed,

implemented with the full support from the government and supported by various

studies on various issues related. The main goals of using digital textbooks are for:

1. Meeting the needs of a paradigm shift in education in line with the learning

style of the new millennium.

2. Improving the understanding and skills to apply the latest knowledge.

3. Providing equal opportunities to all students, regardless of their socioeconomic

background.

4. Reducing the cost of private lessons

If that goal can be achieved, digital textbooks will hopefully be able to develop

and produce human resources that can compete in the global economy [20]. The

Pub Res Q

123

digital textbooks programme in South Korea is implemented by using several

phases from 2007 to 2011.

1. Choosing a school to test the effectiveness of digital textbooks in the actual

application in the classroom.

2. Training teachers and consultants using digital textbooks in the way of effective

pedagogy. Various training will be given either online or in the traditional way

of face-to-face session.

3. Building infrastructure to support the use of digital textbooks. A tablet will be

provided to all students in the classroom. Schools are equipped with Internet

line, wired so students could access the Internet.

4. Building a digital textbook distribution system and a standard quality

management system to be implemented.

5. Associated with legal and regulatory aspects of the implementation such as

copyright, protection from hacker, etc.

6. Establishing an assessment system to analyze the effectiveness of digital

textbooks.

Effectiveness of digital textbooks has been studied in various investigations. In

South Korea, Kim [26] found that students feel happy and be independent, in their

academic performance after using digital textbooks. Song et al. [57] also found that

the test group using digital textbooks show higher academic achievement than the

control group who use printed textbooks. Students who live in small and medium-

sized cities showed significant differences in the level of their academic

achievement, compared to students who live in a big city. However, there is no

difference between the test group with the control group which their parents have a

first degree, while there are differences between the two groups whose their father

only received a high school diploma [25].

The study also identifies the advantages and positive features with the use of

digital textbooks. Among them, the practice of making preparations in teaching is

increasingly recedes. By using conventional textbooks, teachers need to spend the

time preparing teaching materials to enhance students’ motivation to learn.

However, since the digital textbook is equipped with materials that stimulate

students, teachers could use more time to design and build the teaching strategy,

instead of just providing materials. As such, teachers can give attention to providing

instructional feedback than just checking homework.

Korean Education Research Information Service or KERIS [25] was also

conducted a study on the impact of digital textbooks. Data from schools that used

digital textbooks was cited by MEST. The survey was conducted in 7 months from

May to December 2008. A total of 4284 students from 24 schools were participated

in this study. Academic achievement is selected as the main independent variable to

identify the effectiveness of digital textbooks. Other variables were also measured

to obtain a better understanding of the impact of digital textbooks. Among them are

attitude towards learning in certain subjects, problem solving skills, self-regulatory

learning ability, and the effects of digital textbooks. For academic achievement, the

study found that there was no significant difference between groups of digital

Pub Res Q

123

textbooks users with the consumer groups of printed textbook, while the difference

between rural and urban schools students is significant. Significant differences were

found among the weak students and in different subjects.

Urban students who use digital textbooks also recorded a higher mean in science,

social studies and Korean language than their counterparts who use printed

textbooks. The group of rural students who use digital textbooks recorded higher

results compared to the group of printed textbooks user in all subjects. Furthermore,

the weak students who use digital textbooks recorded higher results than the group

user of printed textbook in urban or rural areas [25].

By taking the model in, South Korean digital textbooks transformation program

is planned, researched and implemented with the support and supervision by the

government. In this respect, Malaysia can expect the responsibility of the Ministry

of Education to act as their counterpart in South Korea. However, commitment from

the government alone is not sufficient for the transformation to digital textbooks

requires commitment, support and the support of all stakeholders.

Textbook Digital Program in Malaysia

Malaysia launched its digital textbook program on February 1, 2014. All of the 10,094

primary and secondary school students in this country have access to over 300 digital

versions of textbooks for free using 1BestariNet system. It can be accessed online by

students, parents and teachers who have the password at any time (Berita Harian,

February 1, 2014). 1BestariNet project is implemented by the Ministry of Education

through Malaysian Education Development Plan (MECC) to enhance teaching and

learning process and to bridge the digital divide between rural and urban students.

Through this digital textbook program, all schools are connected in a single

learning database using high-speed 4G internet. Users are given access to the

program list for the Virtual Frog learning applications, Google Apps for education

and the Frog Store. According to the Minister, The implementation of the system

enables mobile learning or m-learning and learning in any place or u-learning are

two trends to enhance e-learning initiatives. In the first wave (2013–2015) program,

ministry upload 313 titles accessed free of textbooks via the portal 1BestariNet. For

the second wave (2016–2020), the ministry plans to produce the interactive

textbooks for the selected subjects, which contains elements of text, graphics, audio,

video and animation to help students in teaching and learning. The third wave

(2021–2025) will see the publication of digital textbooks for all subjects including

for students with special needs (Berita Harian, February 1, 2014).

This program is not free from criticism, including from the opposition parties.

Zairil Khir Johari, a representative from Democratic Action Party (DAP, one of the

opposition party in Malaysian parliament) in the debate in Parliament stated that this

program is part of the ICT infrastructure mega projects awarded to a company,

YTL. Among the projects being implemented by the Ministry through YTL is 4G

broadband installation in all 10,000 schools under 1BestariNet program, providing

Virtual Learning Platform, which includes digital textbooks as well as the supply of

Chrome book laptops to schools. He criticized the implementation of the approach

Pub Res Q

123

of ‘‘one size fits all’’ by not taking into account the various differences in student

background. He also questioned the willingness of teachers to implement this

program since the use of ICT among teachers and students are very limited. Most

teachers (approximately 80 percent) only use ICT as much as an hour a week, while

the UNESCO report in 2012 revealed that there was no evidence to suggest the use

of ICT managed to foster creativity, problem solving, critical thinking and

communication skills among students.

Existing studies on the use of digital textbooks inMalaysia are pessimistic about the

success of the program if implemented. Mira Faizura [36] found the lack of teachers

proficient in the use ofCD-ROM, and due to lack of experience, the learning syllabus is

slowly completed. In addition, the infrastructure and facilities are inadequate to be

usedwith active application. However study by Jamaludin andMohamed [21] showed

that the electronic book project is successful in achieving the goal of fostering a culture

of searching and modification of information among students.

Following are some thoughts pros and cons of using digital textbooks that should

be considered.

1. ‘‘What we have seen, although the use of e-Book is not reach the level of 100

per cent, there is progress in the use of ICT. The E-Book Project implemented is

not only in the form of hardware alone, it also contains textbooks, al-Quran,

Islamic teaching, dictionary and other applications. (Ghazali Taib, Terengganu

state Chairman of the Education Committee, Higher Education, and Innovation,

30 September 2013).

2. Since 2009, the Terengganu state government has distributed a total of 23,000

units of e-book computer gradually to Year Five students in primary school;

Teachers in Terengganu still use the blackboard when teaching although

students were given e-book laptops; E-Books distributed to students in Year

Five students, disrupted after 2 years of use; When the computer is damaged, it

cannot be repaired, because no one knows.

3. I have little doubt of the effectiveness of e-book in helping the learning process.

Firstly, students are feared cannot concentrate to the lesson for a long time.

Staring at a computer screen for too long will affect health. The text on

computer screen is made of pixels which is not good for the eye and affects

concentration. Second, many low quality computers emit radiation and toxic

vapors. This leads to the indoor environment and many students also harm your

computer. Third, is the security aspect of e-book in school or at home. What if

the e-book is lost or damaged? (Father, Besut, Terengganu)

Conclusion

Digital textbooks is not the perfect solution to enhance learning among students.

Although many studies tend to show its effectiveness in the learning system

compared to printed text book, its implementation in Malaysia should be planned

Pub Res Q

123

carefully. Most students, parents, teachers, schools, government, and other

stakeholders in the education system are generally not ready to move to digital

textbook. In South Korea, which so far ahead in the exploration of digital textbooks,

the weakness of the book is often admitted. Some studies show that digital

textbooks have their drawbacks [8, 26] and it can be summarized as follows:

1. Since many features of e-learning are combined in digital textbooks, no clear

boundary is clear between digital textbooks with websites related to teaching

content and structure.

2. Parameters in digital textbooks are quite comprehensive, makes it difficult to be

built and maintained. The time required and the cost constraints also make

digital textbooks difficult to publish, especially if the target readership is

limited.

3. Digital textbooks may also be unable to provide content or images that are

similar to printed text book, so students may have to refer to the printed version.

4. Since the model of teaching and learning through digital textbooks are still rare,

the role and effectiveness in the classroom is still unclear [8].

However, the use of textbooks in the education system appears to bring

advantages in many aspects, including the effectiveness of teaching and learning

and is more economic in the long term. Digital textbooks allow students to learn

content that can be tailored to their abilities and interests. This new textbooks is also

not heavy, easy to update and provide learning experiences by utilizing multimedia.

The use of digital textbooks in the education system provides opportunities and

challenges to the wider student and interested parties such as teachers, schools,

parents, publishers, government and so on.

However, it should be recognized that the effectiveness of digital textbooks are

not yet clearly proven. Studies by stakeholders such as publishers or service

providers apparently exaggerating the greatness of digital textbooks and tends to

give the impression that the use of printed textbooks as outdated and not helpful in

the current education system. Studies from academics are more focused on the

extent of whether digital textbooks can replace printed textbooks as the main

vehicle for learning.

For Malaysia, the move to shift to digital textbooks should be undertaken after

careful research and consideration. Among the issues to be considered by the

government before implementing this program are:

1. Does the use of digital textbooks can increase the interest, understanding,

satisfaction and effectiveness in learning?

2. The digital divide between rural and urban students

3. Willingness of school system in implementing digital textbooks such as

schools, teachers, and parents

4. Availability of technology

5. The willingness of all parties in publishing.

Pub Res Q

123

The digital textbooks program should not be implemented in Malaysia if it only

benefits a handful of stakeholders, rather sacrifice the interests of other parties such

as students, teachers, schools, and parents.

References

1. Azevedo R. Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of

self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol. 2005;40:199–209.

2. Azevedo R. Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educ Psychol.

2005;40:193–7.

3. Azevedo R, Cromley JG. Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with

hypermedia? J Educ Psychol. 2004;96(3):523–35.

4. Baddeley AD. Working memory. Science. 1992;255:556–9.

5. Baylor AL. Perceived disorientation and incidental learning in a web-based environment: internal and

external factors. J Educ Multimed Hypermedia. 2001;10:227–51.

6. Bransford J, Brown A, Cocking R. How people learn: mind, brain, experience, and school. Expanded

ed. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

7. Buchanan T. The efficacy of a World-wide Web mediated formative assessment. J Comput Assist

Learn. 2000;16(3):193–200.

8. Byun HS, Choi JI, Song JS. The research on the prototype development of digital textbook. J Instr

Technol Res. 2006;22(4):217–24.

9. Calcaterra A, Antonietti A, Underwood J. Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning.

Comput Educ. 2005;44:441–57.

10. Canas AJ, et al. CmapTools: a knowledge modelling and sharing environment. In Canas AJ, Noovak

JD, Gonzales FM (eds). Concepts maps: theory, methodology, technology. proceedings of the first

international conference on concept mapping, vol 1. Universidad Publica de Navarra, Pamplona,

Spain, pp 125–133; 2004.

11. Clariana R. Pace in mastery based computer assisted learning. Br J Educ Technol. 1997;28(2):135–7.

12. Crosby M, Stelovsky I. Hypermedia as a facilitator for retention: a case study using Kanji City.

Comput Assist Language Learn. 1994;1:3–14.

13. Cunningham D, et al. The textbook of the future. In: McKnight C, Dillon A, Richardson J, editors.

Hypertext: a psychological perspective. London: Ellis Horwood; 1993. p. 17–49.

14. diSessa AA. Changing minds: computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2000.

15. Donald M. Origins of the modem mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition.

Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1991.

16. Frey, D., & Simonson, M. (1994). Assessment of cognitive style to examine students’ use of

hypermedia within historic custom. Home Economics Research Journal, 21, 403–421.

17. Gee JP. What video games have to teach us aho-iit learning and literacy?. New York: Palgrave

Macmillan; 2003.

18. Henly D. Use of web-based formative assessment 10 support student learning in a metabolism/

nutrition unit. Eur J Dent Educ. 2003;7:116–22.

19. Hutchins EL, Hollan JD, Norman DA. Direct manipulation interfaces. In: Nonnan DA, Draper S,

editors. User centered sistem design: new perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale:

Eribaum; 1986. p. 87–124.

20. Jackie Hee YK, Hye YJ. South Korean digtal textbook project. Comput Schools. 2010;27:247–65.

21. Jamaludin HB, Mohamed Amin E. Keberkesanan penggunaan buku elektronik: Penulisan karangan

berbantuk deskriptif. J Teknologi Maklum Multimed. 2006;2:43–54.

22. Jonassen DH. Designing structured hypertext and structuring access to hypertext. Educ Technol.

1988;28:13–6.

23. Jonassen DH. Evaluating constructivistic learning. Educ Technol. 1991;39:28–33.

24. KERIS. Adapting education to the information age. http://english.keris.or.kr/ICSFiles/afieldfile/2008/

07/29/WhitePaper2007.pdf. 2007.

25. KERIS. The effects of digital textbooks. Seoul, South Korea: South Korea Education and Research

Information Service (KERIS); 2008.

Pub Res Q

123

26. Kim HR. Forum on defining digital textbook through the developmental models. Seoul: South Korea

Education and Research Information Service; 2005.

27. Kress G. Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge; 2003.

28. Large A. Hypertext instructional programs and learner control: a research review. Educ Inf.

1996;4:95–106.

29. Lawless K, Brown A. Multimedia learning environments: issues of learner control and navigation.

Instr Sci. 1997;25:117–31.

30. Low R, Sweller J. The modality principle in multimedia larning. In: Mayer R, editor. Cambridge

handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 147–58.

31. Mariano GJ, Doolitle P, Hicks D. Fostering transfer in multimedia instructional environments. In:

Zheng R, editor. Cognitive effects of multimedia learning. Hershey: IGI Global Publishing; 2009.

p. 237–59.

32. Mayer RE. Multimedia learning. New York: Cambrisge University Press; 2001.

33. Mayer RE. Principle for managing essential processing multimedia learning: segmenting, pre-

training and modality principles. In: Mayer RE, editor. Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.

New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 169–82.

34. Mayer RE, Moreno R. Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learn Instr. 2002;12:107–19.

35. Medley MW How to use ebooks as a learning tool. http://ezinearticles.com/?How-to-Use-Ebooks-As-

a-Learning-Tool&id=3227855. 2012.

36. Mira Faizura Narawi (n.d.) **Aplikasi penggunaan CD-ROM di Sekolah Seni Malaysia, Kuching,

Sarawak. http://www.kkmas.edu.my/v1/images/pdf/APLIKASI-PENGGUNAAN-CDROM.pdf.

37. Rahman MNA, et al. Inovasi dan kreativiti dalam rekebentuk buku teks sekolah menenangah:

Aplikasi pendekatan interpretive structural modelling (ISM). Juku J Kurikulum Pengaj Asia Pasifik.

2013;1(1):1–9.

38. Moreno R, Mayer RE. Cognitive principles of multimedia earning: the role of modality and conti-

guity. J Educ Psychol. 1999;91:358–68.

39. Moreno R, Mayer RE. Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: role of methods

and media. J Educ Psychol. 2002;94:598–610.

40. Moreno R, Mayer RE. Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: when reading helps listening.

J Educ Psychol. 2002;94:156–63.

41. Moreno R, Valdez F. Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and

words in multimedia environments: the role of student interactivity and feedback. Edu Technol Res

Dev. 2005;53:35–45.

42. Muller-Kalthoff T, Moller J. The effects of graphical overviews, prior knowledge and self-concept on

hypertext disorientation and learning achievement. J Educ Multimed Hypermedia.

2003;12(2):117–34.

43. Murray J. Hamlet on the holodeck: the future of narrative in cyberspace. Cambridge: MIT Press;

1999.

44. Norman D. The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday; 1998.

45. Novick LR, Morse DL. folding a fish, aiming a mushroom: the role of diagrams in executing

assembly procedures. Memory and Cogn. 2000;28:1242–56.

46. Paivio A. Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986.

47. Papert S. Mindstorm: children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books; 1980.

48. Papert S. The connected family: bridging the digital generation gap. Atlanta: Longstreet Press; 1996.

49. Parkinson A, Redmond JA. Do cognitive styles affect learning performance in different computer

media? ACM SIGCSE Bull. 2002;34:39–43.

50. Pintrinch PR. An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory

and research. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25:94–104.

51. Potelle H, Rouet J. Effects of content representation and readers’s prior knowledge on the com-

prehension of hypertext. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2003;58:327–45.

52. Rieber L, Kini AS. Theoretical foundations of instructional applications of computer-generated

animated visuals. J Comput Based Instr. 1991;18(3):83–8.

53. Scheiter K, Gerjets P. Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educ Psychol Rev.

2007;19:285–307.

54. Shaffer DW. Pedagogical praxis: the professions as models for post-industrial education. Teach Coll

Rec. 2004;106:1401–21.

55. Shaffer DW, Kaput JJ. Mathematics and virtual culture: an evolutionary perspective on technology

and mathematics. Educ Stud Math. 1999;37:97–119.

Pub Res Q

123

56. Shapiro A. The relevance of hierarchies of learning biology from hypertext. J Learn Sci.

1999;8(2):215–43.

57. Song HD, Jun JS, Ryu JH. The effects of digital textbook in student learning. Seoul: Seoul

Metropolitan Board of Education; 2007.

58. Williams M. Student control and instructional technologies. In: Jonassen D, editor. Handbook of

research on educational communications and technology. New York: Macmillan; 1996. p. 957–83.

59. Zakrzewski S, Bull J. The mass implementation and evaluation of computer-based assessment.

Assess Eval High Educ. 1999;23:141–52.

60. Zheng R, Zhou B. Recency effect on problem solving in interactive multimedia learning. Educ

Technol Soc. 2006;9(2):107–18.

61. Zheng R, Miller S, Snelbecker G, Cohen I. Use of multimedia for problem-solving tasks. J Technol

Instr Cogn Learn. 2006;3(1–2):135–43.

Pub Res Q

123