De la masquerade du film video
Transcript of De la masquerade du film video
1
From masquerade to video-film : mediatingthe demonic in West Central Africa
Michael Rowlands UCL.
I have a problem with the idea of an
irreplaceable object. The problem is with the
idea that an object has an essence that makes it
irreplaceable. To say that an object is
irreplaceable must assume that it has a
particular character or content; that is unlike
any other. If an essence exists that makes an
object irreplaceable, we must also assume a
single mode of transmission that ensures that
the essence contained in the object remains
irreplaceable. Moreover irreplaceable objects
can not survive exposure as fraudulent or fake ;
like relics they will not survive questioning
2
the twinned scrutinies of authenticity and
efficacy.
The focus of my paper is to deny the necessity
for these assumptions empirically in the setting
of West Africa. I will argue that here we can
examine the displacement of the idea of
irreplaceability from one object to another and
from one mode of transmission to another. A
notion of irreplaceability implies the presence
of an economy of replaceables i.e. a search for
new things to re-materialize irreplaceability.
If my argument has weight then the idea of an
irreplaceable object cannot depend on what it
represents or means’. Singularity cannot be fixed
in meaning but rather depends on what the object
or image is or what it does at any particular
moment. The direction of analysis is therefore
1
performative rather than interpretive and the
source of debate is Latour but the focus on
efficacy also suggests that what is deemed
irreplaceable at one moment can , at another,
become irrelevant and replaceable and no longer
authentic or efficacious. If the object /image
doesn’t represent or mean anything anymore but
still exists, then it does so because of its
potential.
The assumption I am making about the materiality
of irreplaceable objects takes up two of the
classic arguments made about the definition of
the fetish, in particular as re-interpreted from
Marx by William Pietz (1985:5-17) Pels ( 1998)
and others :
1. The fetish denies a radical separation of
matter and spirit or as pointed out by
Latour at least since Durkheim "the price of
2
entry into the sociology profession" has been
"to realize that the inner properties of
objects do not count, that they are mere
receptacles for human categories" (Latour,
1993: 52). What has become rather generally
argued as the independence of object agency
(eg Gell 199 ) although fetish objects are
usually associated with the body.
Historically, "'fetish' has always been a word of
sinister pedigree", as Pietz remarked (1985: 5).
Initially a product of the encounter between
Europeans and Africans, in particular the
relation of the Portugese with coastal West
Africans in the 16th and 17th centuries, it
became synonymous with the fear of the inability
to keep God and the World apart (Graeber )
Irreplaceable encounters
1
In Critique of Judgement Kant insists that we
cannot think of living matter as possible. The
essential character of matter,he argues, is
inertia (Kant Judgement sec 73,# 394) . A
long philosophical history can be invoked in
the West opposing the implications of a |
Kantian perspective turning nature into a
resource or a commodity to stress instead the
spontaneity of matter. What, it would be
asked, are the implications of taking seriously
the vitality of (non-human) bodies? ( Bennett
2010 :viii). As Latour would argue, what
would it mean to treat a resource not as a
commodity but having vitality that is not
necessarily described as having a spirit or
soul ? ( Latour 2004 ).
But this emphasis amongst writers ,such as Gell
( 1998 ),Latour (1994 ) and others, on the
2
efficacy of things, sits uneasily with a
European distrust of ‘false objects’ ( objects
that whilst detached from the body can act upon
it and control it). The fear of things subverting
the autonomously acting self, is related historically
to the transformation of the value of relics from
agency to sign during the Counter Reformation of the
Catholic church in Europe.The Protestant appeal
against any kind of proof of divine presence in
the shape of a spirit or a soul occupying
idolatrous statues/relics managed by priestly
led rituals was countered by Catholic retention
of the spirit of God to be encountered
personally in the ritual of the Mass. Although
between 1520 and 1650 , hundreds of thousands
of relics were destroyed in Europe, it didn’t
mean that the irreplaceable nature of the relic
was lost . In defending itself against
Protestantism, Catholicism became both, more
1
and less like its adversary. The Catholic
church emphasised hierarchical control at the
expense of the uncontrolled growth of popular
devotions, by pushing for what can be described
as a "modernising agenda": the removal of
"superstitions", which consequently involved
assessments of exactly what kind of belief and
practice should be deemed superstitious and
what should constitute authentic faith; the
elimination of quasi-commercial elements and
overt exchange relations from devotional life
and the examination of legends, saints, relics
and miracles in the light of historical-
critical evidence. Relics came to be treated
as signs of the power of the church rather than
capable in themselves of miraculous powers .In
the hundred and fifty years between 1580 and
1730, relics of saints that had been recently
2
re-discovered in the Catacombs of Rome, were
dispersed through large parts of the Catholic
world, reinforcing the power of the church with
Rome as its centre. But, these processes
brought about a new balance between "true and
false miracles, moving attention towards the
question of authenticity and certification and
towards the definition of the modern boundaries
of faith and superstitition, religion and
medicine [or science more generally] that are
still in force today" (Gotor 2004: 123; cited
in Geisbusch nd).
. So today the fact that you can buy your
personal relics on ebay and create your own
household shrine ( cf Geisbusch nd ) also
corresponds with two other moves in the
sacralisation of object collecting. The
first ,coinciding with the disciplining and
1
authenticating of relics, is the collection of
exotic objects as ‘curiousities’. As the
miraculous agency of relics weakens, ,( au moins
à partir de 1215, les reliques doivent être
présentées dans des reliquaires fermés, et on ne
peut donc les toucher: Concile de Latran IV,
canon 62 : « que les reliques ne doivent pas être
exhibées ( ostendantur ) en dehors de leur
boite » cf Recht 2008), collections of museum
objects appear instead to provide an avenue to
the wonders of alterity without the superstitious
fear of the object’s capacity to heal or cure.
The rise of the museum in Europe, from Cabinet of
Curiousity in 17th century to ideas of object
classification by the late 18th century, invokes
a second movement towards treating objects as
signs . From the Vatican collection in the mid
16th century onwards in Europe, ethnographic
2
objects are collected because they evoke the
capacity to represent some broader concept or
reality . As Peter Pels has documented early
museum objects are chosen to evoke a sense of
wonder , the feeling of being in the presence of
the extraordinary, to create a sense of being out
of place or in a state of radical difference.
And this sense of wonder arises out of feelings
of rupture and wounding; an interruption to the
everyday expectation of things, caused by the
recognition of the entry of the foreign, the
alien or the strange into a world of routine
similarity ; it’s the wonder of alterity ( Pels
1997:91-122).
But if the ethnographic object collected as 17th
century curiousity, shared something with relics
(both are features of the Catholic south of
1
Europe ), it was a concern with the materiality
of the object –ie ethnographic objects acted as
rarities or curiousities that were not yet part
of ordered collections, taxonomies or
classifications. Like relics they just were; they
had their own presence as signs of wonder. If the
relic joined the believer to the invisible world
of the saint, the rarity of a cabinet of
curiosity evoked the strange or the uncanny as a
feeling of wonder; awe in the face of alterity.
If the relic had a singular relationship in its
essential relationship to the body of a saint,
the ethnographic curio would in Europe become
part of a more systematic process of
documentation and classification converting the
inert power of the object into a taxonomic sign.
But as Arnold has shown cabinets of curiousity in
Northern Europe became linked instead to
2
experimentation and alchemy ( Arnold 1995).
Another source of influencing the body led
eventually to the development of medicine. But
whilst objects were still curiousities in the 17th
century , they could potentially be fetishised,
in the sense of being generic rather than
individual and magical rather than religious.
Moreover, as relics were emptied of their
associations with miraculous powers ,becoming
signs rather than agents, ethnographic
curiousities gained the potency of touch, could
be handled and examined and their alchemic power
exposed. ( cf Classen 2005) It is somewhere
within the culture history of this secularizing
trend to recognize certain ‘magical’ qualities in
everyday objects and substances that ,I would
argue, we can see the diffusion of an idea of the
irreplaceable object in European popular culture.
1
It is significant that things as diverse as
toys,models and portrait painting gain value
through their irreplaceability by the end of the
18th century. But another feature of the
irreplaceable as the outcome of the entangled
relationship between relic and curiousity in
Catholic Europe of the 17th century, was the
discovery of the ethnographic object as fetish in
the European encounter with West Africa.
The Mask
Witnessed by the sheer number in museum and
private collections and the quantities produced
for the tourist market, the mask is undoubtedly
the irreducible fetish like object as cultural
stereotype created in European relations with
2
Africa . African masks were already selected as
the essential icon of African art by the time
that Picasso and Braque and Apollinaire raised
it to a higher level of primitivism in the
creation of Cubism . Bataille re-iterating Freud
on the uncanny, saw the mask as a Surrealist
disturbance, allowing for both the expression of
anxiety ,a sense of danger and a sexual thrill
(Ades 2006). Uniqueness of the mask as
authentic to primitivism, in particular African
primitivism, in turn relates it to European
encounters with Africa in the origin of the
concept of fetish . Pietz ,for example,
distinguishes the fetish from the idol by its
‘irreducible materiality’ identifying the latter
instead as a physical image of an immaterial
original or idea ( Pietz 1985). A Freudian notion
of the Fetish, defined as an object that does not
1
represent anything, hints at a sense of thrill
and horror whilst having knowledge of it doesn’t
deny the temptation of a suppressed desire (Freud
2002) .
The Mask as fetish in the European imagination
evokes horror,–the monstrous created as a
feature of borders and transgressions. Also it
compells an inquiry into the nature of
materializing the invisible. When Europeans in
C16th century drew on the language of fetishism ((
the portugese feiticao) to describe the power of
sculptures encountered on the West African coast
as objects capable of material agency the
reaction was already shaped by the re definition
of the meaning of relics rejection by the
Catholic Counter Reformation. A prominent
feature was the extraversion of the superstitious
2
power of the relic to the discovery of the
ethnographic object as fetish in the European
encounter with West Africa. The description of
African masks and figures as fetishes begins
almost immediately with Portugese contact in the
16th century ( Pietz 1985:7). Fetishism was
ascribed to West Africans as a sign of their
inability to cope with the presence of the
invisibility of the spirit world. If
Protestantism had ensured that there could be no
material contact with a transcendant God – only
mediation through prayer and reading a sacred
text , and Catholicism had held on to the literal
meaning of the mass but rejected the materiality
of objects as a means of direct encounter with
the sacred, in the West African periphery, a
third possibility of an animistic relation with
the invisible world of spirits was encountered
1
through touching or acting upon sculptures and
masks, supplemented by imports of European cloth,
metal objects, beads ,ceramics and bottles with
or with out alcohol that were rapidly assimilated
as a means of strengthening the mediation.
Given a vaguely anthropomorphic form , it s
not surprising perhaps that masks gained a
prominence in the characterization of the
religious fetish – ie they were material objects
endowed with a certain animisim . Yet they
displayed the chimeric value in Phillippe
Descola’ description of masks as examples of his
monde de enchevetrement (entanglement) – ie
images can possess additive value by being
composed of elements of diverse origins.( Descola
2010) . Unlike the Christian experience of the
relic as a sign of beatification , the African
fetish became its opposite, a sign of the
2
material mediation to a monstrous world of
sorcery / evil and horror. The essential point is
that with the relic in the medieval Christian
sense the direct link between the invisible world
and the object is the physical embodiment of
Christ and apostles and subsequent beatifications
of saints and the metonymic qualities of
touch ,handling and contact of their body
substances. . What accompanied the European
interpretation of the African mask as fetish ,
came the horrible thought that literally an
external spirit could invade the object or the
body. The fetish was the inverse of the relic and
it was thought that contact with the fetish
object would corrupt the flesh and damage the
soul of a Christian convert. Hence the long term
hostility to ‘pagan objects’ by Portugese,Dutch
or Spanish missionaries centuries on the West
1
African coasts throughout the 16th and 17th
centuries . Up until the late 18th century,
fetishes were burnt or destroyed by Europeans
until the principles of science and evolutionary
classification made collecting them a more
amenable mode of preservation. In fact European
metaphors of bodily invasion would not be
appropriate for understanding indigenous ideas of
body substances and their transmission in much of
west and central Africa but any critique based on
more substantial ethnographic understanding of
African realities would not be relevant here.
Instead it is precisely the hybrid nature of the
way ideas of the relic stripped of animistic
qualities yet still retaining a powerful image
for the curing of bodies and souls entered both
European and African Christian ideas of
conversion and belonging.
2
‘Tribal’ Encounters
Over a long durée of several hundred years , in
particular of long term missionary contact , it
is implausible to imagine a dual structure of
European fear of the mask as materialized fetish
and an independent African aesthetic being
maintained in isolation of each other. The mask
is incommensurable with and in several ways a
consequence of the hyphenated European – African
encounter and the several different forms that
can be recognized:
First,the mask as a hybrid product of this
encounter makes its appearance first as a product
of the decontextulaised museum collection. (fig
Michelle Leiris mask collected in the Dakar –
Djibouti expedition). Anthropologists of
African Art ,for example, have spent the last
1
forty years, establishing that the tribal art
image of the African mask bears no relation to
the study of masquerades , ie where the mask is
part of a performance including a use of dance,
music and a materially transformed human body .
Nor can we simply by re-contextualising the
isolated mask change its significance. The mask,
or for that matter the fetish figure in more
general terms, is shown to have a material and
spiritual presence that proves it capable of
having a power in its own right.
Second, we have examples in which the image as
icon has been transformed through the encounter
with European primitivism, In 1958 the Austrian
artist Susanne Wenger living in Nigeria, was
approached by a delegation of officials of the
Yoruba deity Osun who asked for her help in
2
repairing their shrines in the town of Osogbo .
These had been in decline for some years and the
sacred forest land was being encroached by
farmers and businessmen. (Probst 2007). As a
devotee of the deity, she accepted the offer and
the repair began with the Idi Baba shrine at the
outskirts of Osogbo on the way to Ibokun. Work on
the main Osun temple in the grove followed after
this was completed. However, what was initially
intended to be just a kind of minor face lift,
ended up as nothing but an iconic riot. Ranging
from small and modest statues to huge and
imposing shrines, the grove became flooded with
new image works. Conceptually, by lending the
various Yoruba deities believed to reside in the
grove a new material presence, the idea was to
reunite art and culture in order to fill the
absence that the alienating effects colonialism
1
and capitalism had caused in Yoruba society. Put
differently and phrased in Weberian terms, what
happened had been a shift from the colonial
processes of disenchantment, to a postcolonial
project of re-enchantment. (Probst 2007: 103 ). .
As far as Wenger was concerned the experiment
was a deliberate move to create new iconic
images “expressing the fluid, open and still
undetermined phase that Yoruba society was
believed to go through “ (Probst 2007:103,
Ogundele 2003:107). Thus in 1965 , five years
after Independence the Nigerian government
declared the Osun grove a national monument. In
the 1970’s a festival committee was established
and over the next two decades the Osun festival
became one of the largest cultural festivals in
Nigeria and a prominent site in the memoryscapes
2
of the Yoruba diaspora, entering the UNESCO world
heritage list in July 2005 (Probst 2007: 104).
Relating words to objects
This relationship of words to objects is central
to understanding another aspect of the encounter
between Europeanas and Africans; the impact of
Missionary Christianity . Central to the origins
of the Protestant tradition in the Reformation in
Europe was the status of language . Prayer and
reading aloud replaced the Catholic tradition of
ritual and veneration of objects and images. As
Talal Asad has shown, sincerity of the Christian
believer is based on the belief that words give
outward expression to the inner intentions of
persons. Language is the crucial mediator between
the subject and the object and the intention of
1
believers is best evaluated by the purity of
their speech (Asad 1993).
A strong idea exists instead in West Central
Africa that speech activates the power of objects
and substances for either good or bad effects.
Intentions cannot be judged by speech alone but
by the effects speech and words as well as the
tone of the sounds of speech or the level of
noise have on both things and substances that
affect the person. These include substances in
the body and hence illness and death. For long
periods extreme Protestant sects found it
difficult to reconcile their basic hostility to
material objects as fetishes with this
materialized use of speech and sound in many
parts of West Central Africa . Quakers for
example rely on the spontaneity of speech as
2
revelation but it is also believed that speech
itself has material effects and should be frugal
and austere . The power of speech to affect the
material world is deeply embedded in Pentecostal
services ,involving emotional display and noise
as a means of attracting the Holy Spirit .
Through possession the devotee will ‘speak in
tongues’, the unintelligibility of which is a
guarantee of its divine source. What gets mixed
up with this in the African context, is that
speech itself is deemed in certain circumstances
to come from ancestors and is not contained
within or a product of the living person. In fact
this is why angry speech or complaining speech is
powerful in the sense that the speech of
ancestors materializes their mediation with
spirit worlds and their speech can activate the
latter to act either for the good or bad of the
1
living to whom the words are being directed (cf
Dillon 1990). Quite often when someone is heard
speaking loudly or angrily , you will hear
someone in earshot admonishing the person saying
‘bad speech’ brings misfortune whatever the
person’s lack of intentionality. Like the
masquerade held in control by a rope, speech can
get out of control.
There is no irreconcilable difference therefore
between the ‘African’ knowledge of the way words,
sound,touch and objects mediate with invisible
worlds and the hostility to the fetish brought to
bear on this scenario by the prejudice of
missionary activities. The Eurocentric bias
privileges words over objects as a result of the
Protestant turn in Christianity. This difference
varies clearly with the dominance of different
2
schools of Christian thought and their impact
through education of the young. Pentecostals are
largely totally hostile to ‘pagan objects’ whist
Catholicism has traditionally been tolerant.
But the impact of more fundamentalist
Christianity in many parts of west central
Africa, has been to drive masquerades either into
a form of dance group spectacle by which the
family of the deceased will display their
prestige or into undisclosed ,usually nighttime,
activities .
The idea that noise is a bridge or a means
of making connections suggest sound acts as a way
of making the invisible visible as a principal
means of mediation to material and spirit worlds.
It may sound odd but the important point is
neither to separate conceptually the material
1
from the spiritual nor sound from the visual . In
a recent discussion of African religions ,
Stephen Ellis and Gerrie ter Haar distinguish
between visible and invisible realms as distinct
space-times set apart in African religions
( Ellis and ter Haar 2004). They argue that
the spiritual or invisible world precedes the
material or visible worlds in time. Spirits are
future oriented and will be in front of the
living in time. The spirit world also has no
spatial constraints ie spirits can travel
anywhere and be there instantaneously. But the
visible and the invisible worlds also overlap ,
and where they do, there are gateways where kinds
of heterotopias form that are materialised as
spirit possession, or objectified in spirit
shrines or Pentecostal churches. Using Badiou,
(2005) this materializing of identities is not
2
only principally ritual in form but also is
experienced as an event through the spatialising
act of segmenting and localizing the flux of
temporalities
My general argument is that in non Islamic West
Africa , very broadly, it is sound that activates
objects and substances whether in the form of the
voice and tones of words, or music or more
generally percussive effect. Objects do not have
fixed essences in the sense that they can be
traced to an origin, in particular that of the
body of a saint or the skill of a particular
author . But the idea that certain objects or
sites,once activated, may retain the power to
protect against malevolence and moreover, this
may be reinforced through demonstrable success in
their efficacy,does make them irreplaceable. It
1
is through the idea that combinations of
words ,sounds and objects are efficaciousness in
repressing feelings of anxiety that we can
understand how this serves to displace
expressions of horror to another medium ; the
video horror film .
From mask to videodrama
In the Western genre category of the horror
movie, the monster is a reflection on the nature
of evil that emerges through the actions of
individuals . As Tobias Wendel, has emphasized ,
the internalisation of the horror movie in
Africa, is not simply one of adoption but more a
staging and restaging in local video films of
different expectations of the nature of evil
(Wendel 2001). Witchcraft is a substance that
2
within the body can be activated and take
different forms and powers ,for example the
witchdoctor, the jujuman, evil pastor or the
stealer of body organs for occult rituals. In
both Nigeria and Ghana, video dramas portray the
village and tradition as backward, poor,
dangerous and uncivilised. Fears of witchcraft,,
particularly among the young and urban dwelling,
are directed aagainst close , elderly, kin
living in the village. The difference between
thee domesticated village and the bush or forest
as wild is transformed into village experienced
as a wilderness and the city as the hope for
well-being and success .Yet the village is where
all will claim an origin ; where the dead as a
corpse must be returned for burial and where
access to the invisible world of ancestors and
spirits will be achieved. Hence the frequency
1
with which the village is depicted in films as
over-run by witches and cannibals is matched by
the hero ( for example, a fundamentalist pastor)
who comes to clean the place up and return its
inhabitants back to a moral way of life. Whilst
the city and increasingly the diasporic life
abroad is of the present and the future., the
diaspora is also the world of modernity and
innovation but, in itself, is incapable of
reproduction; it has a sterile quality . In the
literature on ‘bushfalling’ ( literally implying
that the migrant is a hunter who goes to the bush
or wilderness of the modern) , the young who in
the past went to the forest to hunt for bushmeat,
now go to the modern urban equivalent to
gather wealth and items of success. But the
bushfaller (literally the person who falls into
the bush) is unable to reproduce the conditions
2
of success without bringing the products of it
back to the village ( in the form of remittances,
or building a house there) (Nyamnjoh 2011).
Videodramas have the same status as the
mask/masquerade therefore in creating the
conditions for bringing the outside in. If the
mask represents the outside being brought into
the village as a masquerade , it does so because
of its hybrid Euro-African character. However as
image and words, the consumption of video-dramas
is compatible with more fundamentalist Christian
ideals of the religious service ,with a focus
on speech and prayer. It is also more compatible
with modernized forms of witchcraft discourse
linked by some writers to new forms of cultural
economy defined as the conjuring of wealth by
resort to inherently mysterious techniques .
Ellis and ter Haar have already criticized the
1
tendency to use terms like ‘occult’ to generalise
about the nature of African religion. The problem
being that calling them occult implies the
western connotation of an abstract evil separate
from what happens in everyday material life.
Instead a working definition of African religion
used here assumes a more immanent sense of
material efficacy through direct mediation .
Hence if masquerades are nor representative of
anything but are literally deemed to have
significant means to mobilize spirits in
invisible worlds then the same can be said of
video movies. They are not horror movies simply
in the sense of Freud’s release of the repressed
but are more literally a means of describing the
efficacy of an invisible world intervening in the
conditions of material life
2
Conclusion
My argument hinges on the idea that the value of
irreplaceability need not be due to a quality of
uniqueness . The idea of unique and
irreplaceable objects, usually with some notion
of emotional attachment, which we associate in
psychoanalytic terms with Melanie Klein’s
discussion of good and bad objectsa or John
Bowlby’s writings on attachment theory, are I
suggest more deeply rooted in the early Christian
ideas of the power of relics and their capacity
to create a special human relationship based on
healing and curing. I would argue that the idea
of the fetish was a product of European anxiety
in dealing with the power of the relic at home
only to encounter its inverse in Africa. But this
was also based on the opposite principle that the
1
idea of the relic as irreplaceable ( linked to
the power of the body as sacrifice in
Christianity) also found its inversion in
Africa; the idea that the irreplaceable depended
on replaceables , on ‘taking the outside in’ .
What I think we need to understand is the economy
of replaceables needed in order to identify an
object as irreplaceable – and how by studying
their different forms over time we can identify –
a preoccupation with the irreplaceable as a
metaphysic that materializes itself in different
forms.
European encounters with Africans was part of the
process by which the vitality of matter was
demonized in order to usher in the 17th century
‘scientific revolution’. If matter was inert and
passive, then unlike ‘in nature’, in itself
matter as inert presents no dangers except from
2
the effects of human intervention. The argument
in this paper participates therefore with a wider
growing consensus on the efficacious powers of
things or the idea of vibrant matter. But while
these arguments are politically also salutary,
they miss the sense of longing that remains
implicit in the notion of ‘irreplaceability’.
Similar to Pierre Lemonnier’s teddy bear as
childhood companion, the idea of ‘growing up’ and
putting childish ‘things’ aside demonizes the
longing for the loss of the relic but also
justifies our everyday adult sense of being a
collector .
Bibliography
1
Ades, Dawn.: Undercover Surrealism : Georges Bataille and
Documents with contributions by: Fiona Bradley .
London : Hayward Gallery.
Arnold,Kenneth 1995 Materia Medica :A New Cabinet of
Medecine and Art. London:Wellcome Institute.
Asad, Talal. 1993 Genealogies of Religion
Baltimore : John Hopkins Press.
Badiou, Alain. 2005 Being and Event
London :Continuum Press
Bennett, Jane 2010 Vibrant Matter:A political ecology of
things Duke University Press: Durham NC.
Brown, Peter (1982): The Cult of the Saints: Its Rise and
Function in Latin Christianity. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Classen,Constance 2005 Touch in the Museum . In
Classen,C.(ed) The Book of Touch 275-287
Oxford|:Berg
2
Descola, Philippe 2010 La Fabrique des Images
Connaissance des Arts, 437. Paris :Musée du
Quai Branly.
Dillon,Richard. 1990 Ranking and Resistance.
Stanford:Stanford University Press
Ellis, Stephen. and ter Haar Gertie. 2004 Worlds
of Power:Religious thought and Political Practice in Africa
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freud, Sigmund (2002): Civilization and Its Discontents.
London: Penguin.
Geisbusch,Jan nd Awkward Objects:Relics, the Making of
Religious Meaning and the Limits of Control in the Information Age
PhD thesis submitted University of London 2008
Geary, Patrick J. 1986 Sacred Commodities: The
circulation of Medieval Relics, in A. Appadurai
(ed) The Social Life of Things:Commodities in Cultural
perspective.169-191. Cambridge:Cambridege University
Press.
1
Geary, Patrick J. (1990 [1978]): Furta Sacra: Thefts of
Relics in the Central Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
Gell, Alfred 1998.: Art and agency : an anthropological
theory Oxford : Clarendon Press,
Latour, Bruno.: 1993 We have never been Modern /
translated by Catherine Porter. New York ;
London : Harvester Wheatsheaf
Latour, Bruno. 2004 Reassembling the Social Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Nyamnjoh, Francis 2012 Cameroonian Bushfalling
American. Ethnologist 38:4:701-713
Ogundele, W. 2003 Omoluabi: Ulli Beir, Yoruba Society and
Culture. Bayreuth African Studies 66.
Pietz, William. 1985 The Problem of the Fetish
1 Res 9,5-17
Pels, Peter. 1997 The Spirit of Matter. On
fetish, rarity, fact and fancy. in Spyer,
2
Patricia. (ed) Border Fetishisms London Routledge
91-122
Probst Peter. 2007 Picturing the Past:heritage
and photography and the politrics of appaearance
in a Yoruba City in eds de Jong F. and Rowlands
M. (eds) Reclaiming Heritage. Walnut Creek:
California: Left Coast Press
Recht,Roland 2008 Belieiving and Seeing : the
art of Gothic Cathdrals trans by Mary Whittall
Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Rowlands Michael. 2007 The Sound of Witchcraft:
noise as mediation in religious tradition. In:
Berliner, D. and Sarro, R.(eds) Learning Religion
Oxford: Berghahn ,191-208
Wendel Tobias. 2001 Vision of Modernity in
Ghana. Mami Wata shrines,photo studios and horror
films. Visual Anthropoogy 14:269-292