Dataset: Emergency drill Vesalius SN 500. Deceased disaster victims: Response and modeling

20
Christel Hendrickx, RN, CCRN – Disaster Coordinator Els Jenar, MBS – Forensic Medicine Wim Develter, MD – Forensic Medicine Wim Van de Voorde, MD, PhD – Forensic Medicine Marc Sabbe, MD, PhD – Emergency and Disaster Medicine Emergency drill Vesalius SN 500 Deceased disaster victims: response and modeling

Transcript of Dataset: Emergency drill Vesalius SN 500. Deceased disaster victims: Response and modeling

Christel Hendrickx, RN, CCRN – Disaster Coordinator

Els Jenar, MBS – Forensic Medicine

Wim Develter, MD – Forensic Medicine

Wim Van de Voorde, MD, PhD – Forensic Medicine

Marc Sabbe, MD, PhD – Emergency and Disaster Medicine

Emergency drill Vesalius SN 500

Deceased disaster victims: response and modeling

There are no conflicts of interest

Background information University Hospitals Leuven

  Staff: 8892

  Physicians 1406

  Nurses 2965

  Others 4521

  Authorised beds: 1995

  Activities per year

  Admissions 63.885

  Hospitalisation days 460.732

  Day care 99.711

  Outpatient appointments 672.663

  ED visits per year: 53.428

Road map: Vesalius SN 500 - Emergency Drill

Objectives of the study

  Improve processes & information management

  Processes for:

  Deceased victims

  Hospitalised victims

  By collaboration between hospital internal & external service

Focus: SWS/PCS – DC – FOR – C&C cell – PSIS (BRC) – DVI

  Goals:

  Forensic medicine: proposal national protocol

  Belgium: standardised exchange disaster victim identification system

Methods

  Modified Delphi: expert panel

 Questionnaires interviews aid workers

 Questionnaires observers

  Time measurements

  Visual material (film crew – pictures)

  Observer reports

  Questionnaires day 3 (cfr De Soir, Zech & Rimé)

  External and internal observers / simulants about aid workers

  Interviews aid workers: qualitative research (NVivo in progress)

Approval of ethical committee

Results: time measurements (32 h film – pictures)

  Important findings:

  Field exercise

  Prompt start

  Long time interval before starting forensic activities

  Hospital exercise

  Forensic processes

  Long but adequate

  Psychosocial intervention

  Long but chaotic

  Coordination & Command Cell exercise

  Insufficient use of alerting procedures

Results: observer reports (n = 26)

  Important findings:

  Field exercise

  No major, only limited operational remarks

  Hospital exercise

  Forensic processes

  Good organisation individual dependent

  Psychosocial intervention

  Independent processes of internal and external services

  Coordination & Command Cell exercise

  Presence of experts resulted in teaching moments

  Limited knowledge about crisis management

  Disaster coordinator

  Not officially informed by key players, nor hospital services (exercise coordinator)

Results: questionnaires day 3 (cfr De Soir, Zech & Rimé)

Results: interviews aid workers (n= 28)

  Important findings:

  Field exercise

 Conflict between exercise and “reality”

  Hospital exercise

  Forensic processes

 Need of better operational guidelines and efficient communication

  Fatigue due to long lasting processes risk for human errors

  Psychosocial intervention

  Lack of integration: communication – coordination – collaboration

Discussion: limitations - biases - confounders

  Limitations

  Artificial split of exercise over several days

  Biases

  “Reality” of the exercise

  No real victims / family

  Confounders

  Daily activities of the hospital

  Limited interest in crisis management

Conclusions

  A specific but only rarely tested exercise

  Registration of existing responses

  Management

  Information & communication flows

  Observations of potential improvements

  Modeling to a national protocol

  Forensic medicine: national protocol

  Belgium: standardised exchange disaster victim identification system

  Importance of a hospital disaster coordinator

  High satisfaction of direct collaborators

Day 1: preparatory phase (skills lab)

Day 2: disaster site

From disaster site to the hospital (CT- Scan)

Day 3: support relatives of surviving and fatal victims

Identification process: chains morgue

Day 4: Coordination & Commando cell

University Hospitals Leuven

Questions – Remarks ?

  A special word of thanks to:

  DVI: chief inspector Dirk Maes

  PSIS (BRC): Koen Van Praet

  Police force Lubbeek: superintendent Herman Vercoutter

  Fire brigade Zaventem: captain Pascal Elskens

  Correspondence:

Christel Hendrickx, RN, CCRN Marc Sabbe, MD, PhD Wim Van de Voorde, MD, PhD

Emergency Department Emergency Department Forensic Medicine

University Hospitals Leuven University Hospitals Leuven University Hospitals Leuven

Herestraat 49 Herestraat 49 Herestraat 49

3000 Leuven 3000 Leuven 3000 Leuven

Belgium Belgium Belgium

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]