Dark Physics: Resurfacing the universe point by point
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
4 -
download
0
Transcript of Dark Physics: Resurfacing the universe point by point
Dark Physics Resurfacing the universe point by point
James E. Beichler
OSAPS Fall Meeting 8-9 October 2010 Marietta College, Ohio
In the past few decades two new ‘crises’ for fundamental physics have emerged by the observation of phenomena that indicate the existence of
Dark Matter and Dark Energy. These are not problems which can be solved by quantum theory, but rather problems that are related to gravity theory as
expressed by the general theory of relativity. Numerous ideas and hypotheses have been suggested to explain these problems, but no particular hypothesis or resulting model has yet proven satisfactory. No model proposed within the framework of the present paradigms seems to be able to explain either DM or
DE even though most physicists agree that the two should have a single common explanation. However, a new model has been developed to explain both DM and DE by reinterpreting and unifying the present paradigms. This
model includes a fundamental change in Newtonian gravity theory that expands three-dimensional space to four dimensions and thus forces the
acceptance of an extrinsically curved four-dimensional space-time in relativity. The extra gravity term can then be equated to the Lambda-CDM that has already been added to Einstein’s equation describing the surface
curvature of the universe and leads to a unification with the quantum. Yet this new model is not without consequences for the rest of physics and science.
Accepting this new model would mean accepting the reality of a macroscopically extended fourth space-like dimension.
10/09/2010 James E. Beichler 2
The source and nature of both Dark Matter and Dark Energy are the ‘crises’ in physics of our day. It
is generally assumed that explaining either one will lead to a
scientific revolution
06/12/2010 3 James E. Beichler
2006 Report of the DETF
Dark energy appears to be the dominant component of the physical Universe, yet there is no persuasive theoretical
explanation for its existence or magnitude. The acceleration of the Universe is, along with dark matter, the observed phenomenon that most directly demonstrates that our
theories of fundamental particles and gravity are either incorrect or incomplete. Most experts believe that nothing short of a revolution in our understanding of fundamental physics will be required to achieve a full understanding of the cosmic acceleration. For these reasons, the nature of dark energy ranks among the very most compelling of all
outstanding problems in physical science. These circumstances demand an ambitious observational program to determine the dark energy properties as well as possible.
06/12/2010 4 James E. Beichler
Numerous suggestions and hypotheses have been put forward to explain DM and DE, but no particular
hypothesis or resulting model has proven satisfactory and no model yet proposed in mainstream physics is
able to explain both DM, in either let alone both of its forms of CDM or HDM, and DE even though most physicists agree that the two should have a single
common explanation.
Having said that, DM and DE can be easily explained by thinking outside the box of mainstream physics.
06/12/2010 5 James E. Beichler
As each star or star system is added to the galaxy and orbits the
galactic core, it has a component of gravitationally derived velocity as well as an extra component that
corresponds to the four-dimensionality of the galactic plane
06/12/2010 6 James E. Beichler
The more stars added to the galactic plane, the greater the four-dimensionality and
variation from the average curvature of the universe as a whole
06/12/2010 7 James E. Beichler
The halo forms around the galaxy to maintain three-dimensional continuity with
the rest of the universe
Quantum and other restrictions limit our commonly perceived
material reality to three-dimensions so what we ‘observe’ is
the actual three-dimensional material reality of our existence
06/12/2010 James E. Beichler 10
Since ‘observed’ material reality is restricted to three-dimensionality, the stars in the galactic rim cannot
‘really’ stick out into the fourth dimension of space and thus pick up DE to increase their speed to a
constant value
06/12/2010 James E. Beichler 11
The ‘Classical’ Paradigm
FEM = qE + qv ⊗ B Scalar Potential field Vector Potential field
FGr = mg Scalar Potential field
General Relativity
Intrinsic space-time curvature
06/12/2010 12 James E. Beichler
Gravity has a centripetal component to it as well as the
normal radial component directed toward the center of mass of the
system.
06/12/2010 James E. Beichler 13
However, unlike normal centripetal forces whereby ‘r’ remains constant
at constant ‘v’ when the object is restricted to remain in circular motion by some physical means, the galactic situation is reverse and the DM halo
restricts the motion which causes constant ‘v’
06/12/2010 James E. Beichler 14
A higher than gravity-normal ‘v’ should cause the stars systems in the rim to spin out of the galaxy, but the extra
component of gravity is directed in the fourth direction while the actual motion is constricted to three-
dimensional space - the inertia (mv) of the star systems compensates with a
constant v in what can be called a reversal of normal centripetal situation 06/12/2010 James E. Beichler 15
The New Paradigm
FEM = qE + qv ⊗ B Scalar Potential field Vector Potential field
FGr = mg + mv ⊗ Γ
Scalar Potential field Vector Potential field
General Relativity
Extrinsic space-time curvature 3-D 4-D
06/12/2010 17 James E. Beichler
The New Paradigm
FEM = qE + qv ⊗ B Scalar Potential field Vector Potential field
FGr = mg + mv ⊗ Γ
Scalar Potential field Mach’s Principle Vector Potential field
General Relativity
Extrinsic space-time curvature 3-D 4-D
06/12/2010 18 James E. Beichler
DM and DE explained
FEM = qE + qv ⊗ B Scalar Potential field Vector Potential field
FGr = mg + mv ⊗ Γ
Scalar Potential field Mach’s Principle
Vector Potential field
(is Dark Energy)
General Relativity
Extrinsic space-time curvature 3-D 4-D (is Dark Matter)
06/12/2010 19 James E. Beichler
The momentum mv is three-dimensional or what the gravity normal would be ‘if’ the galactic plane protruded tangentially into
the fourth dimension, but the cross product throws it into the
fourth dimension
06/12/2010 James E. Beichler 20
Newtonian space with a separate time has now been
four-dimensionalized
06/12/2010 James E. Beichler 24
Now we can move to an equivalent relativistic model of a five-dimensional space-
time continuum
06/12/2010 James E. Beichler 26
The New Paradigm
FGr = mg + mv ⊗ Γ
Tμν = G μν + λ 3-D space/4-D space-time 4-D space/5-D space-time
06/12/2010 28 James E. Beichler
The basic equations of SOFT
Einstein 4-D space-time
5-D space-time
4-D space-time with anti-symmetric portion
Quantum gravity
T G
T G g
F m g
hrgr g ( )
T
06/12/2010 29 James E. Beichler
The component x5, a distance in the fourth direction of the four-dimensional space, is
additive for each succeeding gravitational mass orbiting or moving around a central mass, thus causing the plane of a galaxy to grow tangentially to the overall space
curvature of the universe
F m g m
d
dtxgr 0 0 5( )
F m g m
d
dtxgr 0 0 5( ) sin
F m g pgr g F
F m g m vgr g I rel
06/12/2010 30 James E. Beichler
n.d.
• Flint relates the basic fundamental electric charge to a 5-D momentum
• The quantity Π5 = g/αc (α = constant in KK theory of the EM field) is a component of momentum with the conjugate coordinate u5
• Flint regards the electron, photon and positron as “aspects of the same thing”
• and etc – Here flint defines the quantum with regard to 5-D space-time
5
5
du nh
06/12/2010 32 James E. Beichler
‘Particles’ - n.d.
• “It seems implied that the simple assumption of a fundamental particle is not possible – the limit must result from a relativistic assumption. The only way seems to be a relativistic limit to measurement.”
• So he is using the quantum as a limiting factor within the 5-D continuous field
• “Instead of a fundamental particle would mean a limit exists, but the particle would be available for Lorentz rule of change of length in motion. The introduction would mean that a limit exists.”
06/12/2010 33 James E. Beichler
Flint’s final unification - 1966 • The Quantum Equation and the Theory of Fields
Methuen’s Monographs of Physical Subjects – 1. The Theory of Relativity
– 2. Theory of Kaluza and Klein
– 3. Field Theories
– 4. The Symmetric Energy tensor and the Tensor of Moment of Momentum
– 5. The Derivation of the First Order Quantum Equation
– 6. Continuation of the Field Theories
– 7. The Basis of the Theory in Accordance with the Principles and Notation of the General Theory of Relativity
06/12/2010 34 James E. Beichler
Other contributors • 1928 - W. Wilson derived the Klein-Gordon equation
assuming a 5-D volume equal to Schrodinger's wave function
• 1926-1966 - H.T. Flint incorporated the Yukawa Potential, Dirac equation and other quantum features into the 5-D field model
• 1995 - Vu B. Ho derives the Yukawa Potential directly from the General Relativistic 4-D model of curved space-time
• 2008 - Shifflett shows that the Einstein-Schrödinger skew-symmetric form of the Einstein equation with Λ-CDM implies a 5-D structure for space-time
06/12/2010 35 James E. Beichler
Working backwards from Shifflett - If the Einstein curvature tensor is 5-D with both 4-D symmetric and anti-symmetric parts, both gravity
(symmetric) and Λ-CDM (anti-symmetric) are accounted for
06/12/2010 James E. Beichler 36
It is absolutely impossible for particle physicists to depict
quarks in any logical manner – Why? – Because there are no physical particles called
quarks, they are just mathematical entities
06/12/2010 38 James E. Beichler
The quantum of electrical charge ‘e’ is just a strain in the surrounding space
due to an internal stress in real extended particles and a quark is just how that stress is redistributed along
the 3-Ds of space within a particle (according to a quantized Pascal's Principle) during a collision with another real extended particle
06/12/2010 40 James E. Beichler
What does this theory predict? • Existence of DM halos around all material objects –
Galaxies, Stars, Planets (Titus-Bode Law?)
• The shape of these DM halos would be spherical around individual objects but elliptical around galaxies
• An additional velocity for the slingshot effect
• The existence of ultra-high speed ionized particles (cosmic rays) exiting galaxies
• An increasing rate of expansion of the universe as well as a corresponding decrease in earlier times
• The existence of a proton dominated universe
• The amount of DE in any 3-D volume of empty space
• Galactic diameters are slightly less than predicted by normal gravity theory
06/12/2010 41 James E. Beichler