CRASSH talk, May 2014 (Cambridge)

30
Mobilizing the Development Narrative : South Korean Developmental Visions for Infrastructure, Domestic and Southeast Asia, 1956-1973 John DiMoia, NUS, Department of History & STS Cluster 1

Transcript of CRASSH talk, May 2014 (Cambridge)

Mobilizing the Development Narrative: South Korean

Developmental Visions for Infrastructure, Domestic and Southeast Asia,

1956-1973

John DiMoia, NUS, Department of History & STS Cluster

1

Question:

•What does South Korea mean / suggest when it mobilizes its aid to SE Asia •(Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia)?

• + ”aid recipient to aid giver”• + “successfully underwent the • developmental experience”

2

Initial Frame: the post-Korean War reconstruction story? A “success” story?

3

Actually . . . much earlier than this~

(import substitution)

4

Even back to 1945, and earlier (Japan, NK in

the background)

5

Today’s Talk (5 / 21): Tracing

Competing / Contrasting

Narratives—1) The Ch’unju Fertilizer Factory Project • (1954-early 1960s) (domestic / “failure”);

• 2) The Pattani–Naratiwat Highway (1965-1968) (international / “success”);

• 3) The present-day turn: • the ROK and Southeast Asia?

6

. I. The Ch’unju Factory /

Project Model: Integrating with other Major Projects? / The

Electrical Grid?

7

The desired end / product?:

“agricultural,” and also as an index of development?

8

9

(1954-1960) / starting point—and numerous

associated problems . . . (Park Tae-gyun, industrial

center)

10

In subsequent memory, dramatic changes in perception (5 year

plan):

11

And still later, a very mixed legacy . . .

• Dennis Fitzgerald

• O Won Chol

12

II. Adding the International

Dimension: Pattani-Naratiwat Highway

13

Chung Ju Yung / Hyundai—its

image as a chaebol

14

Prior Forms of Mobilization . . .

Han River Bridge, 1958 han.mi hypcho—via FOA, ICA

15

Pattani-NaratiwatBased in Southern Thailand

Constructing a highway, approx. 98 km

The “first” South Korean international project (covered by KBS) –departure from Kimpo airport December 1965

Will be a critical experience for the company in developing its expertise

16

Ambitious, young workers on

behalf of the firm, and the ROK nation—the

“Hyundai engineer”

17

The Thai Experience as formative? How so? And

for whom?

18

Hyundai’s Corporate Office in

Thailand, early 1960s (Thai-ROK relations)

19

ARD (Accelerated Rural Development)

Concentrated in NE

Thailand (Bordering Laos)

So why a highway in the South?

Linked with Thai Nation-Building

Sponsored by IBRD

20

“Successfully” completed by

February 1968 (just over two years)

21

The Project’s Short-term

Legacy for Hyundai:• Equipment Problems• Labor Problems (Thai workers)• Weather problems• Ultimately a Financial Loss (of about 1 • million US $)_________________________•But a “successful” completion: meaning greater access to the market—here

• meaning Vietnam, and still later?

22

(1) The Kyungbu Expressway

(1968-1970): Seoul / Pusan

23

But what about the autobahn

context (Park story)?

24

(2) Vietnam (1965-1973):

Military Projects and ConstructionRMK-BRJ

25

More examples?

26

III. Linking to the present-day?

27

And in memory—

28

Some (very) tentative conclusions?

• (1) the domestic-regional-international • relationship?• (2) The Japanese / imperial / post-co • context?• (3) Hybrid and eclectic, in terms of • models, material practice—borrowing • whatever works• (4) “Caught between Empires”: •

(Japan, US, others)?

29

Thanks~

• (1) “Engineering Asia” (Hiromi Mizuno, • Aaron S Moore)—edited volume

• (May 29th at NRI)

• &• (2) “Energy and Infrastructure” / 2nd book

• project

30