145

© The Ecological Society of America wwwwww..ffrroonnttiieerrssiinneeccoollooggyy..oorrgg

In 1934, Alfred C Redfield reported that the ratiosbetween the elements carbon, nitrogen, and phospho-

rus (C, N, and P, respectively) in marine phytoplanktonwere remarkably constant (Redfield 1934). His famousC:N:P ratio of 106:16:1 (by atom) has since becomeknown as the “Redfield ratio” (Falkowski and Davis2004). Redfield further noted that the N:P ratios of phy-toplankton resembled the nitrate:phosphate ratio foundin the deep waters of the oceans (Redfield 1934). Thus,the elemental composition of marine plankton reflectedthat of their environment, and vice versa. However, eventhe seemingly constant pelagic environment is currentlyaffected by changes in the Earth’s atmosphere. The 1934atmosphere contained ~300 parts per million (ppm) ofcarbon dioxide (CO2), which has risen to the present-day

value of 385 ppm, a level that far exceeds that of the nat-ural range of the past 650 000 years. Atmospheric CO2

levels are expected to rise further, to ~750 ppm by theyear 2100 (Solomon et al. 2007). The rapid increase inatmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse gases is accompa-nied by global warming. Average global temperatureshave risen by 0.6˚C since 1934, and an additional 3˚Cincrease is expected to occur over the course of the 21stcentury (Solomon et al. 2007). These changes in globalclimate will affect many chemical and physical processesin aquatic ecosystems, with possible implications for theelemental composition of plankton communities.

Ecological stoichiometry is a rapidly expandingresearch field investigating how the elemental composi-tion of organisms affects ecological processes (Sternerand Elser 2002; Panel 1). Inspired by Redfield and therecent advances in ecological stoichiometry, this reviewexplores the potential impacts of climate change on theC and nutrient availability in aquatic ecosystems, its con-sequences for the C:N:P stoichiometry of plankton com-munities, and its implications for the structure of aquaticfood webs.

� Rising CO2 and ocean acidification

The current rise in atmospheric CO2 levels is having amajor impact on the C chemistry of the oceans (Doney etal. 2009). In fact, it is estimated that almost 50% of theanthropogenic CO2 input into the atmosphere since theadvent of the Industrial Revolution has been absorbed bythe oceans (Sabine et al. 2004). Compared to the largepool of bicarbonate (HCO3

–), dissolved CO2 constitutesonly a minor fraction of the total concentration of dis-solved inorganic carbon (DIC) in the oceans. Yet, risingconcentrations of atmospheric CO2 increase the concen-

REVIEWS REVIEWS REVIEWS

Climate-driven changes in the ecologicalstoichiometry of aquatic ecosystems DDeeddmmeerr BB vvaann ddee WWaaaall11,,22,, AAnnttoonniiee MM VVeerrsscchhoooorr22,, JJoollaannddaa MMHH VVeerrssppaaggeenn11,, EElllleenn vvaann DDoonnkk22,, aanndd JJeeff HHuuiissmmaann11**

Advances in ecological stoichiometry, a rapidly expanding research field investigating the elemental composi-tion of organisms and their environment, have shed new light on the impacts of climate change on freshwaterand marine ecosystems. Current changes in the Earth’s climate alter the availability of carbon and nutrients inlakes and oceans. In particular, atmospheric CO2 concentrations will rise to unprecedented levels by the end ofthis century, while global warming will enhance stratification of aquatic ecosystems and may thereby dimin-ish the supply of nutrients into the surface layer. These processes enrich phytoplankton with carbon, but sup-press nutrient availability. Phytoplankton with a high carbon-to-nutrient content provide poor-quality foodfor most zooplankton species, which may shift the species composition of zooplankton and higher trophic lev-els to less nutrient-demanding species. As a consequence, climate-driven changes in plankton stoichiometrymay alter the structure and functioning of entire aquatic food webs.

Front Ecol Environ 2010; 8(3): 145–152, doi:10.1890/080178 (published online 25 Jun 2009)

IInn aa nnuuttsshheellll::• Rising levels of atmospheric CO2 enrich aquatic ecosystems

with carbon• Global warming strengthens the vertical stratification of

aquatic ecosystems, which suppresses the supply of nutrientsfrom deep water layers into the surface layer

• Enhanced carbon – but reduced nutrient – availability is likelyto increase the carbon-to-nutrient content of phytoplankton ata global scale

• Phytoplankton with high carbon-to-nutrient ratios are of lownutritional value for zooplankton

• Such climate-driven changes in plankton stoichiometry maycascade throughout the entire aquatic food web

1Aquatic Microbiology, Institute for Biodiversity and EcosystemDynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands*(j.huisman@uva.nl); 2Department of Aquatic Food Webs, Centrefor Limnology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Nieuwersluis,Netherlands

Ecological stoichiometry and climate change DB van de Waal et al.

146

wwwwww..ffrroonnttiieerrssiinneeccoollooggyy..oorrgg © The Ecological Society of America

tration of dissolved CO2 in ocean surface waters.Dissolved CO2 reacts with water to form carbonic acid(H2CO3), which rapidly dissociates into HCO3

–, releasinga proton and thereby reducing pH levels. This phenome-non has become known as “ocean acidification”(Caldeira and Wickett 2003; Doney et al. 2009). Sincethe Industrial Revolution, ocean acidification hasdecreased the pH of ocean surface waters by ~0.1 units, toan average surface pH of 8.1 (Orr et al. 2005). At atmos-pheric CO2 levels of 750 ppm – expected by the year 2100– the pH of surface seawater will have dropped by anadditional 0.3 units, to a pH of ~7.8 (Orr et al. 2005).This is equivalent to a doubling of the proton concentra-tion. The projected concentration of dissolved CO2 atthat point will be outside the natural range of the past 20million years (Solomon et al. 2007).

Ocean acidification causes a decrease in the concentra-tion of carbonate ions (Caldeira and Wickett 2003;Solomon et al. 2007). This increases the solubility of cal-

cium carbonate (CaCO3) in the oceans. Cold waters areless saturated with respect to CaCO3 than are warmerwaters; high-latitude ecosystems are therefore likely to bethe first to suffer from ocean acidification. Model simula-tions project that Southern Ocean surface waters willbegin to become undersaturated with respect to aragonite,a metastable form of CaCO3, by about the year 2050 (Orret al. 2005; Doney et al. 2009). By 2100, this undersatura-tion could extend throughout the entire Southern Oceanand into the sub-Arctic Pacific Ocean. When waterbecomes undersaturated with aragonite, key marine organ-isms, such as corals, foraminifers, and coccolithophores,have difficulty in forming their CaCO3 skeletons (Orr et al.2005; Hoegh-Guldberg et al. 2007). Laboratory experi-ments with coccolithophores exposed to elevated CO2

yielded malformed and smaller coccoliths (Riebesell et al.2000), although effects varied depending on the strain andgrowth conditions (Iglesias-Rodriguez et al. 2008). Manyother calcifying organisms, including pteropods and other-

Panel 1. Ecological stoichiometry

The field of ecological stoichiometry (Sterner and Elser 2002)looks at the balance of energy (carbon) and nutrients to describethe complex relationships between organisms and their environ-ment. Using the same mass-balance approach routinely employedin chemistry, ecological stoichiometry provides insight into thefeedbacks and constraints operating on C and nutrient fluxes infood webs. Among autotrophic organisms, including phytoplank-ton and terrestrial plants, C and nutrients are taken up separately.As a result, CO2 fixation and nutrient acquisition are relativelyloosely coupled.This makes autotrophs flexible in their stoichiom-etry; their C-to-nutrient ratios can vary over large ranges, andpartly reflect the resource availability in their environment. Forexample, when P is available in high concentrations, C:P ratios inphytoplankton cells are often relatively low. Conversely, when P islimiting but light and inorganic C are in ample supply, intracellularC:P ratios can become very high (Figure 1).

Although the C-to-nutrient stoichiometry of autotrophs mayvary widely, many heterotrophic organisms tend to keep theirC-to-nutrient ratios within a narrow range (Figure 1). This isknown as homeostasis. Heterotrophs usually take up C and nutri-ents simultaneously, so their C and nutrient uptake reflects theC-to-nutrient ratio supplied by their food. However, the nutrientcontent in most heterotrophic organisms is relatively high as com-pared with that in autotrophic organisms (Figure 1).Thus, for manyherbivores, the nutrient content of their food will be low relativeto their own nutrient demands. Yet, different species of het-erotrophs may differ in their stoichiometric requirements. Forinstance, copepods typically have higher C:P ratios than do clado-cerans (Sterner and Elser 2002). Furthermore, stoichiometric requirements may vary with the developmental stage of heterotrophs.Larval and juvenile fish, for instance, often have higher C:P ratios than do adult fish (Figure 1).

One important implication of the stoichiometric imbalance between autotrophs and their heterotrophic grazers is that grazers canbecome nutrient-limited. For instance, without stoichiometric considerations, one might think that an increased light supply, whichenhances primary production, will benefit heterotrophic grazers, because more food is being produced. However, stoichiometric theorypredicts the opposite, because an increased light supply may suppress food quality (Sterner and Elser 2002). Indeed, laboratory and fieldexperiments (Urabe et al. 2002,2003) have confirmed that greater light availability increased phytoplankton abundance, but also increasedthe C-to-nutrient content of the phytoplankton, thus decreasing the quality of the zooplankton’s food (Figure 5).This change in phyto-plankton stoichiometry can suppress the growth of nutrient-demanding zooplankton species (Sterner and Elser 2002; Urabe et al. 2002).

Green alga

Copepod

Juvenile fish

Cladoceran

Adult fish

Phytoplan

kton

Zooplankto

nFish

5000

2000

1000

500

200

100

50

20

10

C:P

rat

io (a

tom

ic)

FFiigguurree 11.. Phytoplankton display a wide range of relatively highC:P ratios, as shown here for the green alga Scenedesmusobliquus (data from Verschoor et al. 2004). Zooplankton andfish have rather narrow stoichiometric ranges (homeostasis).Copepods, such as Eudiaptomus gracilis, typically have higherC:P ratios than do cladocerans, such as Daphnia galeata (datafrom Vrede et al. 1999). The nutrient stoichiometry may alsochange during ontogenic development, as illustrated by the C:Pratio of juvenile and adult fish of the gizzard shad (Dorosomacepedianum; data from Pilati and Vanni 2007).

DB van de Waal et al. Ecological stoichiometry and climate change

147

© The Ecological Society of America wwwwww..ffrroonnttiieerrssiinneeccoollooggyy..oorrgg

mollusks, crustaceans, and sea urchins, willalso be negatively affected by ocean acidifi-cation (Orr et al. 2005; Doney et al. 2009).

� Carbon supersaturation infreshwater ecosystems

In contrast to open ocean waters, manyfreshwater ecosystems, estuaries, and somecoastal environments receive substantialamounts of C from terrestrial ecosystems(Sobek et al. 2005). This occurs mainly inthe form of dissolved organic carbon(DOC). Bacterial activity mineralizes theavailable DOC into CO2. As a result, theCO2 concentration of lakes is usually notin equilibrium with the atmosphere, but isrelated to the concentration of DOC(Figure 2). In fact, CO2 concentrations of1000–3000 ppm are quite common inlakes. On a global basis, inland watersreceive up to 1.9 petagrams (Pg) C year–1

(equal to 1.9 x 1015 g C year–1) from thesurrounding watershed, of which about halfis ultimately flushed into the oceans (Coleet al. 2007). A fraction of the C received byinland waters is buried in sediments, whereas an esti-mated 0.8 Pg C year–1 is processed by aquatic biota, whereit is finally respired to CO2 (Cole et al. 2007; although theexact values are still under debate; LJ Tranvik perscomm). Accordingly, most inland waters are supersatu-rated with CO2, and thus serve as net sources of CO2 tothe atmosphere (Sobek et al. 2005; Cole et al. 2007).

Global warming and rising atmospheric CO2 levels mayalter the input of DOC into freshwater ecosystems,although the magnitude and direction of these changeswill vary regionally. At high latitudes, rising temperatureswill thaw large areas covered by permafrost in Siberia,Canada, and Alaska, releasing massive amounts of trappedorganic C that may flow into ponds and lakes (Zimov et al.2006). Climate scenarios also predict more extreme rain-fall events and more frequent storms in many parts of theworld (Solomon et al. 2007), which may result in increasedrunoff of DOC from terrestrial ecosystems into lakes(Hinton et al. 1997). Conversely, DOC concentrations inthe Experimental Lakes Area in Canada decreased by15–25% during two decades of climatic warming, as aresult of reduced streamflow caused by drought (Schindleret al. 1997). Rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations leadto increased stomatal closure of terrestrial vegetation. Thisreduces plant transpiration, and has been estimated toincrease global runoff by 6% (Betts et al. 2007). In peat-lands, elevated CO2 induces shifts in plant species compo-sition, which could amplify DOC export from peatlandcatchments (Fenner et al. 2007). Other processes alsoaffect the DOC input into freshwater ecosystems, however.For instance, increased DOC concentrations in lakes in

Europe and North America have been explained by areduction in atmospheric acid deposition (Monteith et al.2007). All in all, the effects of climate change on DOCconcentrations in lakes will greatly depend on the localsetting (eg local meteorology, catchment hydrology, landuse, vegetation, and water retention times). Yet, theprocesses described above suggest that DOC concentra-tions may increase in many lakes.

� Global warming and stratification

Rising temperatures influence the physical structure ofaquatic ecosystems. In particular, warming of the upperlayers of lakes and oceans enhances the density differencebetween the surface mixed layer and the deeper watersbeneath. All else being equal, this increased density dif-ference will strengthen the vertical stratification of bothlakes (Jöhnk et al. 2008; Peeters et al. 2008) and oceans(Sarmiento et al. 2004; Doney 2006). Stratification sup-presses vertical mixing across the density gradient, withcontrasting effects on nutrient and light availability forphytoplankton growth. On the one hand, stratificationreduces the nutrient influx from deep, nutrient-richwaters into the surface mixed layer, thus limiting theavailability of nutrients for phytoplankton growth(Behrenfeld et al. 2006; Huisman et al. 2006). On theother hand, stratification entrains phytoplankton popula-tions in the surface mixed layer, thereby improving lightconditions for phytoplankton growth (Huisman et al.1999; Berger et al. 2007).

Many waters in the tropics and subtropics are perma-

FFiigguurree 22.. Carbon dioxide concentration (pCO2) against the concentration ofdissolved organic carbon (DOC) in 4555 globally distributed lakes. Each pointrepresents one individual lake. Circles denote lakes with a single measurement.Triangles represent mean values for lakes with multiple measurements. The solidline shows linear regression for all data points (log[pCO2] = 2.67 + 0.414 xlog[DOC]; r2 = 0.26; n = 4555; P < 0.0001). The horizontal dashed line indicatesthe present atmospheric CO2 level of 385 ppm. (From Sobek et al. 2005.Reproduced with permission from the American Geophysical Union.)

100 000

10 000

1000

100

100.1 0.5 1 5 10 50

DOC (mg L–1)

pC

O2

(pp

m)

©20

05 A

mer

ican

Geo

phys

ical

Uni

on

Ecological stoichiometry and climate change DB van de Waal et al.

148

wwwwww..ffrroonnttiieerrssiinneeccoollooggyy..oorrgg © The Ecological Society of America

nently stratified. Nutrient concentrations in the surfacemixed layer of these waters are strongly depleted (Karl etal. 1997; Huisman et al. 2006). As a result of severe nutri-ent limitation, permanently stratified oceans in the trop-ics and subtropics are characterized by extremely low pri-mary production (Figure 3a, b). Climate–ocean modelspredict that, by the year 2050, the ocean area experienc-ing permanent stratification will have expanded by 4.0%and 9.4% in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres,respectively (Sarmiento et al. 2004), thereby reducingoverall ocean productivity (Behrenfeld et al. 2006).These predictions are surpassed by recent observations,which indicate a much faster expansion of the ocean’sleast productive waters over the past 9 years (Figure 3c–e;Polovina et al. 2008).

In the temperate zone and at high latitudes, waters arenot permanently stratified, and deep mixing during win-ter and/or spring transfers nutrients into the surface layer.In these regions, phytoplankton growth is often light-lim-ited in winter, due to short day lengths as well as deepvertical mixing. Climate warming causes an earlier onsetof stratification in spring, which brings the phytoplank-ton cells into the well-lit surface layer while nutrients are

not yet depleted, and thereby favors their growth. Thisleads to an earlier spring bloom and a substantially longergrowing season in the temperate zone (Winder andSchindler 2004; Peeters et al. 2008).

� Changes in phytoplankton stoichiometry

The elemental composition of phytoplankton can varywidely, and often reflects the resource availability in theirenvironment (Sterner and Elser 2002). Climate-drivenchanges in C, light, and nutrient availability are thereforelikely to affect phytoplankton stoichiometry. In densephytoplankton blooms, the photosynthetic demand forinorganic C can be very high, and this can deplete inor-ganic C to limiting concentrations (Ibelings and Maberly1998). Rising CO2 levels may alleviate these denseblooms from C limitation, especially in low-alkalinityfreshwater ecosystems. In marine ecosystems, however,DIC is dominated by vast amounts of HCO3

–. Many phy-toplankton species can take up both dissolved CO2 andHCO3

– (Kaplan and Reinhold 1999; Martin and Tortell2008). Inorganic C is therefore rarely a limiting resourcein marine ecosystems. However, large, species-specific

FFiigguurree 33.. Relationships between stratification and primary production. (a) Global distribution of annual net primary production(NPP), with low values (blue) in permanently stratified waters of subtropical and tropical oceans. (b) Changes in ocean stratification(open circles) are well correlated with NPP anomalies (closed circles) in the subtropical and tropical oceans (Pearsonproduct–moment correlation: r2 = 0.73; n = 112; P < 0.001). Expansion of waters with very low net primary production during thepast decade, for (c) North Pacific Ocean, (d) North Atlantic Ocean, and (e) South Pacific Ocean. Gray areas had very lowchlorophyll concentrations in both 1998/1999 and 2005/2006, blue areas only in 1998/1999, and red areas only in 2005/2006.([a] and [b] from Behrenfeld et al. 2006; adapted with permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature. [c–e] from Polovinaet al. 2008; reproduced with permission from the American Geophysical Union.)

1000

750

500

250

0

(a)

NP

P (m

g C

m–2

d–1)

40˚N

30˚N

20˚N

10˚N

40˚N

30˚N

20˚N

10˚N

(c)

(d)

120˚E 140˚E 160˚E 180˚ 160˚W 140˚W 120˚W 100˚W

(e)

80˚W 60˚W 40˚W 20˚W 0˚

120˚E 140˚E 160˚E 180˚ 160˚W 140˚W 120˚W 100˚W 80˚W

10˚S

20˚S

30˚S

40˚S

1998/1999 only 1998/1999 and 2005/2006 2005/2006 only

(b)200

150

100

50

0

–50

–100

–150

–200

–250

NP

P a

nom

aly

(Tg

C p

er m

ont

h)

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Year

–0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

Stratificatio

n anom

aly (kg m

–3)

©M

acm

illan

Pub

lishe

rs

©A

mer

ican

Geo

phys

ical

Uni

on

DB van de Waal et al. Ecological stoichiometry and climate change

149

© The Ecological Society of America wwwwww..ffrroonnttiieerrssiinneeccoollooggyy..oorrgg

differences exist in the relative uptake rates of HCO3–

versus CO2 (Martin and Tortell 2008). This interspecificvariability will likely have important implications for thephytoplankton species composition in response to risingCO2 concentrations.

In a recent, large-scale mesocosm experiment in aNorwegian fjord, an increase of the CO2 concentration to1050 ppm resulted in 39% more uptake of inorganic C bythe natural plankton community (Bellerby et al. 2007;Riebesell et al. 2007). Since nutrient uptake remainedlargely unaffected in this experiment, this resulted inenhanced uptake of C relative to that of N and P (Figure 4).Furthermore, recent laboratory experiments have shownthat increased concentrations of CO2 stimulated both Nand C fixation in a marine N-fixing cyanobacterium(Hutchins et al. 2007; Levitan et al. 2007). For these N-fix-ing organisms, C:N ratios did not change with increasingCO2 availability, because their cellular N and C contentsincreased in parallel. However, P uptake was not stimulated,so that their C:P and N:P ratios increased markedly at higherCO2 levels (Hutchins et al. 2007; Levitan et al. 2007).

Changes in stratification patterns are likely to affect phy-toplankton stoichiometry in two ways. A stronger stratifi-cation (1) reduces the nutrient supply from deep watersbelow and (2) keeps the phytoplankton in the well-lit sur-face layer. Phytoplankton exposed to these nutrient-lim-ited but light-saturated conditions typically show increasedcellular C-to-nutrient ratios (Sterner and Elser 2002).Moreover, a reduced N supply and increased light avail-ability promote the competitive success of N-fixingcyanobacteria (Agawin et al. 2007). The proliferation ofthese organisms may force P concentrations in surfacewaters to limiting values. This mechanism seems to applyto the subtropical Pacific Ocean, where the presence of N-fixing organisms yields an overall increase in cellular N:Pratios, and shifts the entire ecosystem toward P limitation(Karl et al. 1997). This suggests that, with climate-drivenwarming and the expansion of ocean stratification, cellularC-to-nutrient ratios – and in particular C:P ratios – arelikely to increase in substantial parts of the world’s oceans.

Thus, both rising atmospheric CO2 levels andenhanced stratification by global warming may shift phy-toplankton stoichiometry in a similar direction, causingan increased C-to-nutrient ratio of the phytoplanktoncommunity and associated changes in phytoplanktonspecies composition toward species that can proliferateunder high CO2/low nutrient conditions.

� Implications for zooplankton and higher trophiclevels

The elemental composition of phytoplankton communi-ties affects the cellular concentrations of proteins, fattyacids, and various other phytoplankton constituentsimportant for zooplankton growth (Sterner and Elser2002; Jensen and Verschoor 2004). The C-to-nutrientratio of phytoplankton is therefore a major determinant of

their quality as food for zooplankton (Panel 1).Zooplankton can become nutrient limited if the nutrientcontent of their food is low as compared with their nutri-ent demands. Several zooplankton species are capable ofcompensating for the reduced nutrient content of theirfood through compensatory feeding (ie by increasing theirfeeding rates). Nevertheless, the costs of compensatoryfeeding and processing of surplus C restrict this strategy toa limited range of C-to-nutrient ratios. Indeed, laboratoryexperiments have shown that growth rates of herbivorouszooplankton species, such as the cladoceran Daphnia andthe rotifer Brachionus, are reduced when feeding on phyto-plankton with high C:P ratios (Sterner and Elser 2002;Urabe et al. 2003; Jensen and Verschoor 2004).

As an example, laboratory experiments performed byUrabe et al. (2003) showed that elevation of the CO2

FFiigguurree 44.. Carbon-to-nutrient uptake ratios during a marineCO2 enrichment study. The graphs illustrate (a) C uptakerelative to N uptake (C:N), and (b) C uptake relative to Puptake (C:P), both integrated over the duration of theexperiment from day 2 onwards. The treatments consisted of350, 700, and 1050 ppm CO2, represented by green, blue,and red lines, respectively. Error bars indicate one standarddeviation. (From Bellerby et al. 2007.)

(a) 10

8

6

4

2

0

Cum

ulat

ive

C:N

up

take

Cum

ulat

ive

C:P

up

take

(b)

1050 ppm CO2

700 ppm CO2

350 ppm CO2

400

300

200

100

00 5 10 15 20 25

Time (days)

1050 ppm CO2

700 ppm CO2

350 ppm CO2

Ecological stoichiometry and climate change DB van de Waal et al.

150

wwwwww..ffrroonnttiieerrssiinneeccoollooggyy..oorrgg © The Ecological Society of America

concentration from 360 to 1500 ppm resulted not only inan increased phytoplankton biomass (Figure 5a), but alsoin an increased C:P ratio (Figure 5b). This reduction infood quality suppressed the growth rate of the cladoceranDaphnia at elevated CO2 (Figure 5c). Similar results wereobtained by Urabe and Waki (2009), although the latterstudy also shows that this adverse effect of rising CO2 on

Daphnia growth can be mitigated by mixed algal diets.Other zooplankton species with lower P requirements,like copepods, may be able to sustain their growth whenfeeding on phytoplankton with high C:P ratios (Panel 1).Accordingly, if growth rates of high P-demanding species,such as cladocerans, are reduced, low P-demandingspecies, such as copepods, might gain a competitiveadvantage. This may cause shifts in zooplankton speciescomposition in response to climate-driven changes inphytoplankton stoichiometry.

An elemental imbalance between phytoplankton andzooplankton may also affect the recycling efficiency of dif-ferent elements (Sterner and Elser 2002). For instance,zooplankton feeding on phytoplankton with a high N:Pratio show an increased release of N as compared with thatof P (Elser and Urabe 1999). Similar relationships applyfor C-to-nutrient ratios, as zooplankton excrete the excessC obtained in their food (Hessen and Anderson 2008).Consequently, a climate-driven increase in phytoplanktonC-to-nutrient ratios may enhance C release by zooplank-ton, whereas nutrients are retained. This positive feedbackwill further increase DOC concentrations and, subse-quently, the CO2 availability for phytoplankton. Sincenutrient limitation continues or is enhanced, because ofreduced nutrient recycling by herbivores, this leads toeven higher C-to-nutrient ratios in the phytoplankton.

The potential increase in C-to-nutrient ratios of phyto-plankton and the subsequent shift in zooplankton speciescomposition may cascade up through higher trophic lev-els. During the past decades, shifts in large zooplanktonand fish communities have been observed in many seasand oceans. For instance, recent studies indicate that krillin the Southern Ocean are gradually being replaced bysalp species (Atkinson et al. 2004), and jellyfish numbersseem to be on the rise worldwide (Purcell 2005).Furthermore, fish size distributions are shifting towardsmaller fish in various marine ecosystems (Pauly et al.2005). Although these changes are primarily attributedto fisheries, climate change may also be playing a role(Pauly et al. 2005; Purcell 2005). Interestingly, salp seemsto have a low body P demand as compared with that ofcopepods and krill, whereas jellyfish and small fish have alower body P demand than larger fish (Ikeda and Mitchell1982; Malej et al. 1993; Sterner and Elser 2002).Furthermore, there are indications that the growth ratesof some P-rich fish species, particularly of herbivorousfish growing on high C:P food, can become P limited(Hood et al. 2005). A climate-driven decrease in the Pcontent of plankton may therefore exacerbate theimpacts that fisheries have on the species composition ofhigher trophic levels in marine pelagic food webs.

� Caveats and conclusions

Climate change can have many impacts on aquaticecosystems. It may favor the development of harmfulalgal blooms (Paerl and Huisman 2008), cause ocean

FFiigguurree 55.. Effects of CO2 enrichment in a laboratory experiment.(a) Biomass of the green alga Scenedesmus, (b) thecorresponding algal C:P stoichiometry, and (c) specific growthrates of Daphnia when fed with these green algae. The treatmentsconsisted of 360, 1500, and 3500 ppm CO2, represented bygreen, blue, and red bars, respectively. Error bars indicate thestandard error of the mean. Bars with different letters weresignificantly different (P < 0.05, Tukey’s pairwise comparison).(From Urabe et al. 2003; adapted with permission from Black-well Publishing Ltd: Global Change Biology.)

(a)30

25

20

15

10

5

0

1600

1200

800

400

0

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

a

bb

(b)

a

b b

a

b b

(c)

360 1500 3500CO2 concentration (ppm)

Alg

al C

:P r

atio

(ato

mic

)A

lgal

ab

und

ance

(mg

C L

–1)

Dap

hnia

gro

wth

rat

e (d

ay–1

)

©B

lack

wel

l Pub

lishi

ng

DB van de Waal et al. Ecological stoichiometry and climate change

acidification (Caldeira and Wickett 2003), and affect thebiogeographical distribution of many species (Hays et al.2005). Current knowledge about the impacts of climatechange on plankton stoichiometry is still limited.Although we have argued that climate change is likely toincrease the C-to-nutrient stoichiometry of planktoncommunities, several processes may impede or completelyreverse this pattern. For instance, as a result of globalwarming, air temperatures are increasing to a greaterextent than ocean water temperatures, causing more fre-quent storms (Solomon et al. 2007). Storms can preventor suppress stratification, and the resultant vertical mix-ing of the water column may enhance the flux of nutri-ents from deeper waters into surface layers. Furthermore,stoichiometric effects of climate change may be mitigatedor even counteracted by eutrophication, through anthro-pogenic N and P loading. These processes provide morenutrients for phytoplankton growth, especially near themore densely human populated regions of our planet, andmay thereby lead to local or regional trends in planktonstoichiometry that deviate from our expected pattern.

Moreover, the response of species, communities, andecosystems to changing environmental conditions can behighly complex, with many non-linear interactions andsurprising feedbacks (Scheffer et al. 2001; Benincà et al.2008). Many planktonic organisms are also quite flexiblein their stoichiometry, and have considerable potentialfor physiological acclimation and evolutionary adapta-tion to changing C and nutrient conditions (Sterner andElser 2002). It may therefore be difficult to predict long-term changes in the ecological stoichiometry of aquaticecosystems, based on only a few climatic drivers.

Nevertheless, by and large, the current state of knowl-edge indicates that rising atmospheric CO2 levels willincrease CO2 availability for biological production, whileglobal warming will tend to strengthen vertical stratifica-tion of aquatic ecosystems, thus reducing nutrient avail-ability in the surface mixed layer. It seems plausible thatthe combination of rising CO2 availability and reducednutrient levels will result in higher phytoplankton C-to-nutrient ratios. These alterations in phytoplankton stoi-chiometry are likely to suppress zooplankton growth, shiftzooplankton species composition to less nutrient-demanding species, and thereby affect the entire aquaticfood web. If we were to follow in the footsteps of Redfield(1934) and measure plankton stoichiometry at the end ofthe 21st century, we might discover a different Redfieldratio, one reflecting a C-rich world.

� Acknowledgements

This review was inspired by a scientific symposium sup-ported by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts andSciences (KNAW). We thank MJ Behrenfeld, RGJBellerby, JJ Polovina, S Sobek, and J Urabe for kind pro-vision of data and figures, and DO Hessen, RW Sterner,and J Urabe for helpful comments on the manuscript.

151

© The Ecological Society of America wwwwww..ffrroonnttiieerrssiinneeccoollooggyy..oorrgg

The research of DBvdW, AMV, and JMHV was supportedby the Earth and Life Sciences Foundation (ALW),which is subsidized by the Netherlands Organization forScientific Research (NWO). This is publication 4517 ofthe Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW).

� ReferencesAgawin NSR, Rabouille S, Veldhuis MJW, et al. 2007.

Competition and facilitation between unicellular nitrogen-fix-ing cyanobacteria and non-nitrogen-fixing phytoplanktonspecies. Limnol Oceanogr 5522: 2233–48.

Atkinson A, Siegel V, Pakhomov E, and Rothery P. 2004. Long-term decline in krill stock and increase in salps within theSouthern Ocean. Nature 443322: 100–03.

Behrenfeld MJ, O’Malley RT, Siegel DA, et al. 2006. Climate-dri-ven trends in contemporary ocean productivity. Nature 444444:752–55.

Bellerby RGJ, Schulz KG, Riebesell U, et al. 2007. Marine ecosys-tem community carbon and nutrient uptake stoichiometryunder varying ocean acidification during the PeECE III experi-ment. Biogeosciences Discuss 44: 4631–52.

Benincà E, Huisman J, Heerkloss R, et al. 2008. Chaos in a long-term experiment with a plankton community. Nature 445511:822–25.

Berger SA, Diehl S, Stibor H, et al. 2007. Water temperature andmixing depth affect timing and magnitude of events duringspring succession of the plankton. Oecologia 115500: 643–54.

Betts RA, Boucher O, Collins M, et al. 2007. Projected increase incontinental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbondioxide. Nature 444488: 1037–41.

Caldeira K and Wickett ME. 2003. Anthropogenic carbon andocean pH. Nature 442255: 365.

Cole JJ, Prairie YT, Caraco NF, et al. 2007. Plumbing the global car-bon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbonbudget. Ecosystems 1100: 171–84.

Doney SC. 2006. Plankton in a warmer world. Nature 444444:695–96.

Doney SC, Fabry VJ, Feely RA, and Kleypas JA. 2009. Ocean acid-ification: the other CO2 problem. Annu Rev Mar Sci 11: 169–92.

Elser JJ and Urabe J. 1999. The stoichiometry of consumer-drivennutrient recycling: theory, observations, and consequences.Ecology 8800: 735–51.

Falkowski PG and Davis CS. 2004. Natural proportions. Nature443311: 131.

Fenner N, Ostle N, McNamara N, et al. 2007. Elevated CO2 effectson peatland plant community carbon dynamics and DOC pro-duction. Ecosystems 1100: 635–47.

Hays GC, Richardson AJ, and Robinson C. 2005. Climate changeand marine plankton. Trends Ecol Evol 2200: 337–44.

Hessen DO and Anderson TR. 2008. Excess carbon in aquaticorganisms and ecosystems: physiological, ecological, and evolu-tionary implications. Limnol Oceanogr 5533: 1685–96.

Hinton MJ, Schiff SL, and English MC. 1997. The significance ofstorms for the concentration and export of dissolved organiccarbon from two Precambrian Shield catchments.Biogeochemistry 3366: 67–88.

Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, et al. 2007. Coral reefsunder rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science331188: 1737–42.

Hood JM, Vanni MJ, and Flecker AS. 2005. Nutrient recycling bytwo phosphorus-rich grazing catfish: the potential for phospho-rus-limitation of fish growth. Oecologia 114466: 247–57.

Huisman J, van Oostveen P, and Weissing FJ. 1999. Critical depthand critical turbulence: two different mechanisms for thedevelopment of phytoplankton blooms. Limnol Oceanogr 4444:1781–87.

Huisman J, Pham Thi NN, Karl DM, and Sommeijer B. 2006.

Ecological stoichiometry and climate change DB van de Waal et al.

Reduced mixing generates oscillations and chaos in theoceanic deep chlorophyll maximum. Nature 443399: 322–25.

Hutchins DA, Fu F-X, Zhang Y, et al. 2007. CO2 control ofTrichodesmium N2 fixation, photosynthesis, growth rates, andelemental ratios: implications for past, present, and futureocean biogeochemistry. Limnol Oceanogr 5522: 1293–1304.

Ibelings BW and Maberly SC. 1998. Photoinhibition and theavailability of inorganic carbon restrict photosynthesis by sur-face blooms of cyanobacteria. Limnol Oceanogr 4433: 408–19.

Iglesias-Rodriguez MD, Halloran PR, Rickaby REM, et al. 2008.Phytoplankton calcification in a high-CO2 world. Science 332200:336–40.

Ikeda T and Mitchell AW. 1982. Oxygen uptake, ammonia excre-tion and phosphate excretion by krill and other Antarctic zoo-plankton in relation to their body size and chemical composi-tion. Mar Biol 7711: 283–98.

Jensen TC and Verschoor AM. 2004. Effects of food quality on lifehistory of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas. FreshwaterBiol 4499: 1138–51.

Jöhnk KD, Huisman J, Sharples J, et al. 2008. Summer heatwavespromote blooms of harmful cyanobacteria. Glob Change Biol1144: 495–512.

Kaplan A and Reinhold L. 1999. CO2 concentrating mechanismsin photosynthetic microorganisms. Annu Rev Plant Phys 5500:539–70.

Karl DM, Letelier R, Tupas L, et al. 1997. The role of nitrogen fixa-tion in biogeochemical cycling in the subtropical North PacificOcean. Nature 338888: 533–38.

Levitan O, Rosenberg G, Setlik I, et al. 2007. Elevated CO2enhances nitrogen fixation and growth in the marinecyanobacterium Trichodesmium. Glob Change Biol 1133: 531–38.

Malej A, Faganeli J, and Pezdiã J. 1993. Stable isotope and bio-chemical fractionation in the marine pelagic food chain: thejellyfish Pelagia noctiluca and net zooplankton. Mar Biol 111166:565–70.

Martin CL and Tortell PD. 2008. Bicarbonate transport and extra-cellular carbonic anhydrase in marine diatoms. PhysiolPlantarum 113333: 106–16.

Monteith DT, Stoddard JL, Evans CD, et al. 2007. Dissolvedorganic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmosphericdeposition chemistry. Nature 445500: 537–40.

Orr JC, Fabry VJ, Aumont O, et al. 2005. Anthropogenic oceanacidification over the twenty-first century and its impact oncalcifying organisms. Nature 443377: 681–86.

Paerl HW and Huisman J. 2008. Blooms like it hot. Science 332200:57–58.

Pauly D, Watson R, and Alder J. 2005. Global trends in world fish-eries: impacts on marine ecosystems and food security. Philos TR Soc B 336600: 5–12.

Peeters F, Straile D, Lorke A, and Livingstone DM. 2008. Earlieronset of the spring phytoplankton bloom in lakes of the tem-perate zone in a warmer climate. Glob Change Biol 1133:1898–1909.

Pilati A and Vanni MJ. 2007. Ontogeny, diet shifts, and nutrientstoichiometry in fish. Oikos 111166: 1663–74.

Polovina JJ, Howell EA, and Abecassis M. 2008. Ocean’s least pro-ductive waters are expanding. Geophys Res Lett 3355: L03618.doi:10.1029/2007GL031745.

Purcell JE. 2005. Climate effects on formation of jellyfish andctenophore blooms: a review. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 8855: 461–76.

Redfield AC. 1934. On the proportions of organic derivatives insea water and their relation to the composition of plankton. In:Daniel RJ (Ed). James Johnstone memorial volume. Liverpool,UK: Liverpool University Press.

Riebesell U, Zondervan I, Rost B, et al. 2000. Reduced calcificationof marine plankton in response to increased atmospheric CO2.Nature 440077: 364–67.

Riebesell U, Schulz KG, Bellerby RGJ, et al. 2007. Enhanced bio-logical carbon consumption in a high CO2 ocean. Nature 445500:545–49.

Sabine CL, Feely RA, Gruber N, et al. 2004. The oceanic sink foranthropogenic CO2. Science 330055: 367–71.

Sarmiento JL, Slater R, Barber R, et al. 2004. Response of oceanecosystems to climate warming. Global Biogeochem Cy 88:GB3003. doi:10.1029/2003GB002134.

Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, et al. 2001. Catastrophic shiftsin ecosystems. Nature 441133: 591–96.

Schindler DW, Curtis PJ, Bayley SE, et al. 1997. Climate-inducedchanges in the dissolved organic carbon budgets of boreal lakes.Biogeochemistry 3366: 9–28.

Sobek S, Tranvik L, and Cole JJ. 2005. Temperature independenceof carbon dioxide supersaturation in global lakes. GlobalBiogeochem Cy 1199: GB2003. doi:10.1029/2004GB002264.

Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, et al. 2007. Climate change 2007:the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I tothe Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panelon Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Sterner RW and Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry. The biol-ogy of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.

Urabe J, Kyle M, Makino W, et al. 2002. Reduced light increasesherbivore production due to stoichiometric effects oflight/nutrient balance. Ecology 8833: 619–27.

Urabe J, Togari J, and Elser JJ. 2003. Stoichiometric impacts ofincreased carbon dioxide on a planktonic herbivore. GlobChange Biol 99: 818–25.

Urabe J and Waki N. 2009. Mitigation of adverse effects of risingCO2 on a planktonic herbivore by mixed algal diets. GlobChange Biol 1155: 523–31.

Verschoor AM, Vos M, and Van der Stap I. 2004. Inducibledefences prevent strong population fluctuations in bi- andtritrophic food chains. Ecol Lett 77: 1143–48.

Vrede T, Andersen T, and Hessen DO. 1999. Phosphorus distribu-tion in three crustacean zooplankton species. Limnol Oceanogr4444: 225–29.

Winder M and Schindler DE. 2004. Climatic effects on the phe-nology of lake processes. Glob Change Biol 1100: 1844–56.

Zimov SA, Schuur EAG, and Chapin III FS. 2006. Permafrost andthe global carbon budget. Science 331122: 1612–13.

152

wwwwww..ffrroonnttiieerrssiinneeccoollooggyy..oorrgg © The Ecological Society of America