Classification model of knowledge-intensive goods driven by value realization

12
^ ^ u m ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ II ^U66Z OOOkZZ 6 S 662-0001 NSSI P ‘ON Z £ ‘lOA I I O Z luara0§BUBj^ i[oiB0S9^ aouaiog i|U B n Q u b X g ^ ei> jft S66Z- OOOT MSSI

Transcript of Classification model of knowledge-intensive goods driven by value realization

^ ^ u m

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ II^U66Z OOOkZZ 6

S662-0001 NSSI

P ‘ON Z£ ‘lOAIIOZ

luara0§BUBj^ i[oiB0S9^ aouaiog

i|UBnQ ubXg^

ei> jft

S66Z- OOOT MSSI

ISSN 1000 -2995

Keyan Guanli Science Research Management

2011 Vo!. 32 No. 4mm

"x'*-

I S S M 1 0 0 0 - 2 9 9 5

9 771000 299114

0 4>

n-

cWri

o^r~litl^

>o';

e;*t(ta

'+-n-

i\inr»

y'>iY

4ii:fr

’\^

4t>

*<^nr»

■UH

-<1k

-t=

=<(«

^••dr

40

■\><s

0•&

-•&

-■fi-

•fi-

mil

H4-

<N

on

o\O

n\o

r-ro

o^o\

VO-Tt-

. Ira

mlO

in\o

t^oo

as

H2-%

¥X

¥t'lt-

tlt-V?

s^-5-

■iH'l«

¥■

A-

n4(•!%’

cS{‘

•!^i£

'V#

•H4H

it?

!is«3iur2•«-mwH"'

<k<wQ

n

s ^

^fS^

■< F

^

by

<M\o

r^o

oo'O

mrj

oo

n04

rO2

__-s^

3-

5%-t%

-t#’

t%-

ti’it-5^

M4iti

HiS

vMv+1

1

■Horj

-g4

Ig-tt’

*.

#'

r^Orj

•*

m ^ ^

^

^

s

1^

Jf- f?

®

i

s ^

Hc-Fh

^

5H

$E$ it?

^ S

g 1

^ {li I

t' S ng ^

t: « i ^ ng ^ ^ S nC ^

^ 4Wm

mzrn

^ ^

^

Z

., ^

^

m

Ig =#] s

Q nn H E!;

^ n m

^

^ n

m

<4j -K

«■

+|D

^

^

^

2

s?

11^ IS 1^

i? ^

^

4<

^

S

^

^

Sv

3g

|nn JIf 1

^ 0

^

S

«

±1 ^ ^

y

tfg §

5

5^

m

^ m S^

^

S{==K

rx

S3 ^

iv It -<#

• l2Sl

ffllS M

« i®

<c g

^fe

fe

{

^1

^

^41

Mr

fe

5^

■S’ {1)6^ M

i

i ^

s

s^

w} m

ii

w

3 K

^

ig ^ 3

^^

ite I

^{^m

{^

-fr ^

s

s

#

:§ ^

-Rm

um ^ s

mtm ^

#i c/) ^m

Mm

\h Mig

^ «i '1

m ^

ift

^

^

w

^ ^

®

^ ^ mW

«

lid

-e- m

t s

g

« 2

s *

.9-

\0 O

:

Is

®

U5 3

l5

PloutosGU
Line

^ m * aScience Research Management

V ol.32,N o.4 April, 2011

: 1000 - 2995 (2011) 04 -0 0 8 - 0086

, m ^ ^ 2

( 1. itp. 100044;2 . mm h s 710049)

m a . ^ a m m R ^ ^ A m m ^ , m ^ M f t t a ^ m ^ a ® , j u m ^ ^ m x

i ^ m m . : ^ m m ^ ^ m m % n i R ^ ^ m i R i f m t i m m ^ m t t j m m i i m A m ^ } i o m ^ ; A m ; s p m ^ ;

F270/F273.2

1

hKM^±m,

i^tt, m ^12 o

M 20 80 ^ R u, i s

1996 1^ ,2 0 0 1 5

30% ,

^ p m rn w ^

@ ^ , p p R ^ s m

* w m a ^ ^ a f f l ^ t t , i w f t m ^ M ^ ® : - ^

2008 - 0 6 - 0 6 ; ^ 0 B m : 2 0 1 0 -0 7 - 08.

# A ® g : H ^ ^ W ® W ± ^ # A ( No. 200800041031 ) ,2 0 0 9 ^ -2011 No. 9092011 ) ,2 0 0 9 ^ -2011

2007 N C E T -0 7 -0 6 8 1 ) ,2008 ^ -2 0 0 9

( No. 2006XZ009) ,2007 ^ -2 0 0 9 ^ o

(1972 - ) , I K S ) , i ^ 3 S « ^ S A , » ± , » ± s , i U ^ g , m ^ ^ ^ * ^ s * a o

1983 - ) , * ( S ) , « ® ± w ^ ^ , m ^ ^ ^ * ^ s * a o

(1968 - ) , K S ) , ! l S « S f t A , » ± , i J ^ g -

© 1994-2011 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved, http://www.cnki.net

PloutosGU
Note
Citation: Gu, Y. X., Shi, Y. Y., & Xiao, Z. D. (2011). Classification Model of Knowledge-intensive Goods Driven by Value Realization, Science Research Management, 32(4), 86-93. (in Chinese)

m 4 m 87

m r n w ^ m ^ m ^ r n ^ o g ^ ,

mm^,^ s e/,8,9,io, i5,i7] , M B W ^ p ^ ^ s ^ ^ m n i

mm^,0 ^ ,

B w m n ^ ^ .:^ ^ f& T i^ ii^ i^ ^ u m ^ m

ffl 1Fig. 1 Framework Design of Research

2

^ m , ^ u ^ ^ m n i m m ^ B , i w a m n ^ ^ t

^ s ± ^ m a m ^ s t m ^ #

^ m ^ M u s ^ ^ s ^ ^ M m ^ . m 5] = B w m

(1 ) , J | f t ^ # ^ T =

2 . 1

^ s ^ ^ u ^

^ p M ^ ^ s ^ m i E ^ ' m ^ m ± - , t i iM^ s ^ m ^ m - ^ r n ^ ^ S o Copeland (1923)

( Effort)

s ( Convenience goods) ^

^ s ( Shopping goods ) ^ ^ s ( Specialtygoods) o Holbrook ^ (1977) ^ Copeland m ^ m S

( Preference goods) o Zhang

^ ( 2000) i ^

^ Copeland m s ^ m * ® ± ^ ^ m r a m ; i ^

s W ^ M # ^ > s (U n s o u g h t goods) o Vaughn

(1980) m^'Mm^'ii^m'^, M m ^ /

m ^1' 12 ^ ^ s ^ ^ m f ^ ^3 m a f f l ^ a m ^ ^ ^ f f l T ^ s m ^ a ^ 4 = m ^ ,Woodward (1958,1965) ^ ^ K ^ m m ^ A ^ s ^

m m n ^ M ,

^ s ^ ^ n m = Hull m (1987)

m m ^ = Nelson (1970)

^ ^ ^ s ^ ^ ^ ^ m ^ s ( Search goods)

© 1994-2011 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved, http://www.cnki.net

^ m * a 2011 ^

m ( Experience goods) o Darby ^ ( 1973 ) ^

Nelson r m( Credence goods) o Peterson (1997)

^ ^clatzky n x(1991) 1 1 ^ 7

( Low - touch)

( High - touch) r m ^W M rm^^M rm ^( utilitarian

product) ( Hedonic product) ^ ^ o2 . 2

Lee n A (2 0 0 6 )

Hui n (2002) Am ” ( Experience goods) ,

S ^ , M M W #

p p ^ r m s M W ^ ^ ra ^

n ^ t t o

m ^ ^ t t , Hui n (2002)

M o ^ ^ ^ n (2003) * ^ p ^ a t t M £ ^ ^ s ^ p ^ r m a ^ 7 ^ ^ o

^ . ± , 1) m ^ o

* 1Table 1 The Comparison of Literatures of Product Classification

mp

K r m

M t t

S

Copeland (1923) m (Convenience goods) (Shopping goods) ( Specialty goods) V

Holbrook, Howard (1977)m (Convenience goods) m ( Shopping goods) ( Specialty goods)

(Preference goods)V

Zhang Li, Nurit Gery

(2000)

m (Convenience goods) m ( Shopping goods) ( Specialty goods)

( Unsought goods)V

Vaughn (1980)/ a e ( ^ ^ f f l ^ $ ) . i t ^ A / ® e ( ^ ^ e ' ¥ S ) .{k ^ a /

^ ) . K ^ A /V

Woodward (1958,1965) $ ^ ^ r w r s ^ ^ t t M ^ r w r s ^ i ^ ^ ^ r w r s VHull, Collins (1987) VNelson (1970) S S ^ r m ( Search goods) , i S ^ ^ r m (Experience goods) VDarby, Kami (1973) S S ^ r m (Search goods), i s ^ ^ r m (Experience goods), m ( Credence goods) V

Peterson n X ( 1997)

/

/ W ® / / W ® / / S ® /

* / S ® /

V

Klatzky n X ( 1991) ^ ^ r m , 4 ^ 5 ® rm , V

P ^ M t t

Kai, Patrick (2002) V

2003)M t t p ^ ^ ^ t t p ^ , ^ ^ p ^ r s ^ - ® p ^ r s , 2 a p ^ r s ^ ^ 2 a p

^ r m , ^ t t f t p ^ r m W f f i f f l a p ^ r m , t t ^ p ^ r m W ^ ^ p ^ r mV

© 1994-2011 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved, http://www.cnki.net

m 4 m

3 «p ^ ^ s m ^ t t ^ ^ p ^ ^ s m ^ t t ^ m a

= i ^ p ^ ^ s

m ® ^ * ® = m ^ , ; ? ^ ^ M p ^ ^ s m ^ u ^ m ^ ® * ^ t p ^ s m ^ m ^ M , u mm i a ^ u

^ m # t t m m n , f ^ ^ ^ - m ^ s m ^ u ^ ^ *

3. 1

p ^ ^ s m ^ U M i a i f f i S ^ F ^ ^ ^ ^ m

m , s ^ u ^ m a ^ ^ ^ ± m M ^ ^ M m p ^

^ s m ^ i ^ p M m ^ p 26 u s ^ # ^ p 27] ^ = m ^ , j ^ s ^ ^ ^ ^ p m M M p ^ ^ s ^ u

^ m m M ^ ^ m m m m m =

'28 ,

a f ^ ^ s =f i M ^ s 'S

p ^ ^ ^ ^ m m m m ® ^ = m ^ , s m ®

^ # = ^ p t m ^ ^ ^ ; ^ M t m ^ #m, i ^ ^ u ^ , i^ffl^mm^,« u a ® , m ^ ^ s ^ a M ^ ^ ^ , ^^pmmW m ; 3t ^ m , ^ u i a ^ ^ ^

s ^ f f l ^ p ^ ^ = ^ p p ^ M ^ ^ ^ m ^ 0 , s i

mm,;&p^pMM ^MM ^:gpmmmffi^^:gp

A ^ p = i ^ , i S f t ^ p m ^ ^ * M ^ , i ^ ^ m ® m ^ , i ^ s m t t ^ ^ ^ m ^ ; ^ i * f t ^

p , i " A f f l p m s # ^ * m ^ ,

m ^ .^ ' - m M M ^ ^ s M ^ ^ ^ p m M ^ ^p ^ ^ s ^ m m M ^ ^ ® =3.2

^ u ^ m ^ ^ ^ ^ m p ^ ^ s ^ m M M u ^ u ^ m m ^ m m m m m — ^ s ^ ^ ^ ^ p m M ^ ^ ^ m ^ ® , ^P®( 2) ; i t s ^ p ^ ^ s ^

s i s f t ^ f f l m f e ^ ^ ^ s i^ A ^ f f lm ^ ® ^ ^ s ^ ^ A ^ f f l m f e ^ ^ ^ s = f t ^ ^ ^ m M m p ^ ^ s r n w ^ ^ m ^ t t , j jfu, M M S ^m m m ® ± , ^ ^ ^ i # m M ^ s m ^ # a ^ ® 7 s m a ^ t t ^ : g p M M ^ M M u ® ^ p # ^ ® m ^ ® m ^ t t # T ^ ^ , ; ^ ^ t ^ ^ m M p ^ ^ s m ^

p ^ ^ s m ^ # a ^ ® M i r n ^ m ^ u ^ m # t t ± - = ^ M ^ s m ^ ^ M ^ ^ s ^ a ^ ^ ^ , M ^ s a ^ ^ f f l p ^ A ^ f f l m a ^ = p ^ ^ s m ^ # a ^ ^ ® T ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ p , M ^ s ^ u ^ m ^ ^ u m ^ m a ^ , s A M ^ p ^ ^ ^ s ^

m ^ s m ^ # ^ p ^ ' > u ® # ^ p m a ^ ® ® m = ^ # ^ s ^ ® ^ ^ ¥ m f ^ u ®

^ p m M m ^ ^ ,

^ (® ( 2 ) ^ i a ^ ^ M ^ m ^ m E M f f l i T E ^ ) o i ^ , : t ® ^ ^ s m ^ # a ^ ^ ^ f e « ^ ^ s m # a ^ a * » ^ f f l m ^ s ^ ^ ^ A ^ f f l m ^ s a ^ , m ^ ^ # ® ( 2) p ^ ^ s m ^ # a ^ ^ ® a f e T ^ ^ ^ ^ a =

^sm ^m a^ttC P roduct complexity) p#^®(Customer involvement) # ^ # p ^ ^ s

"31 ,^p®( 2) m ^ , j f *

= s ^ ^ s m s ^ ^ a m m ^ m f e ^ ^ ^ s , s a ^ ® ^ ^ p # ^ ^ ® ^

m ^ m M M ^ a = m ^ , f t s ^ s m ^ s m t M

© 1994-2011 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved, http://www.cnki.net

90 ^ m * a 2011 ^

r a ^ ;

ffl 2

Fig. 2 Classification Model of Knowledge - intensive Goods Driven by Value Realization

3. 3

R ^ s ^ A ^ r a w m M ,

3. 3 .1

® (2 ) ^ m ^ m m ®

* a ^ # m o

s ^ 2 o

t M ^ ^ 3'34 , w ^ ^ m ® M W ^ ^ ¥ m ^ p p=29 28 , m ^

3. 3. 2

m (2 ) ^ m ^ m m © m ^ s ^ ^ f t ^ f f l m f e

^ ^ m i f f l ^ s , - ^ ^ u f f l ^ * a ^ ^ , ' & s m^ ^ # . ERP^ # m o

: g p # ^ ^ s ^ ^ o

© 1994-2011 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved, http://www.cnki.net

m 4 m 91

^ '36'37 , i i a ® ^ ^ ^ t t f e « ,^ ^ o

3. 3. 3

® ( 2) @

^ t t , i i ^ m P ^ ^ ( Buyer welfare) ,

n o s ^ r m - ^ ^ M - ^ t t r m , M W ^ ^ a

® t t ,

3. 3. 4

® ( 2) ® ^ r m ^ ^ A ^ f f l ^ f e

« ^ r m , M ^ B i r ^ - ^ r m ,^ ^ n o s ^ r m ^ a ^ t t ^ K , K # ^ ^ , m p

* ^ k , ,77E

s ^ ^ w r m ^ M o

Windows m ^ r m , [ ^ ^ 7 * f t ^ f f l ^ f e « ^ r m w ^ A ^ f f l ^ f e ^ ^ r m M w r m ^ M o

^ ( 2) ^ ^ 7 r a ^ p ^ r m ^ r m # t t ^ ^ t t ^

* a w o 0 ^ ,

^ M p ^ r m ^ S t t w t t , m ^ ^ 7 M s ^ r m m ^ ® S ; i f f l

pp r m

^ r m

i a ^ ^ , * a # ^ W 7 M ^ ^ r m ± ^ ^ ^ ^ ,

a w t m M ^ , i f t r m * a ^ ^ $ w^ ^ t t o

m 2 # T a ^ ^ s ^ ^ M M w a ^ ^ s f f a # e t t ®

Table 2 The Comparison of Characteristics of Knowledge - intensive Goods Based on Classification Model

^ A ff i f f lW ^ A ff i f f lW

^ ® f t r s

^ * ® * s A A

t k

m p # ^ s t k t

r m m a a ^ s t k t

t

® t

® t K t

* « « » m ^ t t w s ^ t t S M t t S ^ t t ^ f l M t t

a M ^ a w r a ^ ^ a ^ ® f t t m w t ^ ^

t m « ® “ - ^ - ” w ^ ® f t t m

© 1994-2011 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved, http://www.cnki.net

92 ^ m t m 2011 ^

p p Zi

4

nw^^m

^^am = p^^s^mMMMp^^sm^u ^m^®^a, u^sM^^^pmM^^^m ®, i^Tp^^sm^m^^, s^M^^rawm^mM, spftft fflm ® s i"A fflm ® s *ft fflmfe« ^s i"A fflmfe« s = j^^T^^m Mp^^ss^sa^®^:gp#^®m^u^ m^tt^sm^^us^amtMM^, ; p

ia^^mn, mm^^:

(1) #a^Mp^^s^u^m^^um ^ma^,s^#^p m^ us^#«®^a^ttm± p^p sfms^^^sm^tti^^

(2) u^m^^mp^^s^mMMM^p#tt^^sM^M^^®^^T^^m^mp ^^sm^s^tt^ tM^ttus^u^m#^, i^T^s^#a^ .m a tt. :gp#^®m ^®m^^, ^T^-mp^^sm^u^^ *^^m^s= i^, i^fe«^^®m^m^ s, s m

;TP; m^®^^®m^m s, i^^p^Mwrn, iaf^^pffis®,

mTS^=

0^^m:1] p ^ ^ s m ^ ^ m n [U .

S S ,2 0 0 3 (9) :54 -5 5 .

2] Hui Kai Lung, Chau Patrick Y. K. Classifying digital prod­

ucts [fl . Communications of the ACM, 2002, 45 (6 ) i73 -

79.

Bi p ^ g ^ ^ H ^ ^ ^ x a m m i f l ^ ^ ^ a H

[fl . ® ^ m n , 2 0 0 2 ( 12) :71 -7 4 .

4 g ^ , g ^ i . ^ s g ^ m m m n a f f ffl .

2006 (9) : 91 -9 5 .

5] Melcher Arlyn J. , Khouja Moutaz, Booth David E. Toward a

production classification system [J . Business Process Man­

agement Journal, 2002, 8 (1) i 53 -7 9 . .

6] Wilson, E. B. An Introduction to Scientific Research [M] .

McGraw - Hill, New York NY, 1952.

7] Copeland Melvin T. The Relation of Consumers ’ Buying Hab­

its to Marketing Methods [J . Harvard Business Review,

1923, 1 (4) : 282 -2 8 9 .

8] Holbrook Morris B. , Howard John A. Frequently Purchased

Nondurable Goods and Services [A] . Ferber Robert, ed.

Selected Aspects of Consumer Behavior [C . Washington

DC! National Science Foundation, 1997! 189 -2 2 2 .

[9 Zhang Li, Nurit Gery. EO retailing for all products? [J] .

Business Horizons, 2000, 43 (9) : 49 - 54.

[10] Vaughn Richard. How advertising works- a planning model

[J| . Journal of Advertising Research, 1980, 20 (5) i 22 -

33.

[11] Mortimer J. ( Ed. ) . Integrated Manufacturing [M] . Berlin!

Spring - Verlag and IFS, 1985.

12] Hayes, R. H. , Jaikumar, R. Manufacturing’ s crisis i new

technologies obsolete organization [J . Harvard Business Re­

view, 1988,. 66 C 5) : 77 -8 5 .

[13] Harrington, H. J. Continuous versus breakthrough improve­

ment! finding the right answer [J] . Business Process Man­

agement Journal, 1995, 1 (3 ) i 3 1 - 4 9 .

[14] Blau, P. , Falbe, C. M. , McKinley, W. et al. Technology

and organization in manufacturing [J] . Administrative Sci­

ence Quarterly, 1976, 21 (1) ! 20 -4 0 .

[15] Woodward j . Management and Technology [M] . London! Her

Majesty’ s Stationery Office, 1958.

[16] Woodward J. Industrial Organization! Theory and Practice [M] .

London! Oxford University Press, 1965.

[17] Hull, F. M. , Collins, P. D. High - technology batch pro­

duction systems! Woodward ’ s missing type [J] . Academy of

Management Journal, 1987, 30 (4) ! 786 -7 9 7 .

[18] Neslon Philip. Information and consumer behavior [J] . Jour­

nal of Political Economy, 1970, 78 (20) !311 - 329.

19] Darby Michael R, Karni Edi. Free competition and the opti­

mal amount of fraud [ ] . Journal of Law and Economics,

1973,16 C4) ! 67 - 86.

20] Peterson Robert A, Balasubramanian Sridhar, Bronnenberg Bart

j . Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer mar­

keting [j] . Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,

1997, 25 C4) ! 329 - 346.

21] Klatzky, Roberta L, Susan J Lederman, and Dana EMatula.

Imagined hap tic exploration in judgments of object properties

© 1994-2011 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved, http://www.cnki.net

m 4 m 93

U . Journal of Experimental Psychology i Learning, Memory

and Cognition, 1991, 17 (3) :314 - 322. 30]

22] Lee Kang Bae , Yu Sungyeol, Kim Seong Jun. Analysis of

pricing strategies for e - business companies providing infor­

mation goods and services [Q . Computers & Industrial Engi­

neering, 2006, 51 c 1) :7 2 - 7 8 . 31]

23] Khouja Moutaz, Smith Michael Alan. Optimal pricing for in­

formation goods with piracy and saturation effect [Q . Europe­

an Journal of Operational Research ,2007 , 176 (1 ) ! 482 - 32]

497.

[l4] Bakos Yannis , Brynjolfsson Erik. Information technology, in - 33]

centives and the optimal number of suppliers [A] . Electro/94

International. Conference Proceedings. Combined Volumes [34]

[C] . Boston, MA, USA, 1994! 540 -5 5 7 .

25] u . 35]

^ ,2 0 0 2 ( 6) :20 -2 1 .

26] ^ ^ . r m ^ t t ^ a a m ^ ^ ^ t m M ^ [J ] .

^ ,1 9 9 9 ( 8) :9 - 1 2 . 36]

27] M ^ ^ . ERP [ j ] .

CAD/CAM ^ ® ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , 2 0 0 3 (8) : 13 -1 5 .

28] Salop S. Monopolistic competition with outside goods [ ] . B7]

The Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10 (1) i 141 - 156.

29] Brynjofsson E. The productivity paradox of information tech­

nology J] . Communications of the ACM, 1993, 36 (12) i

67 -7 7 .

Chen Ying - Ju, Seshadri Sridhar. Product Development and

Pricing Strategy for Information Goods Under Heterogeneous

Outside Opportunities J] . Information Systems Research,

2007, 18 ( 2) : 150 -1 7 2 .

Van Deursen Arie. Customer Involvement in Extreme Program­

ming - - XP2001 Workshop Report R] . Software Engineer­

ing Notes, 2001, 26 (6) : 70 -7 3 .

Clemons E. Strategic investments in information technology J] .

Communications of the ACM, 1991,34 ( 1) i 22 -3 6 .

# T ^ ^ ^ ^ w ^ ® t m m ^ J ] . ®

^ ^ ^ , 2 0 0 6 (21) : 17 -1 8 .

a s . 21 - - ^ ® t m J ] .

f t , 2004, ( 6 ) : 21 -2 2 .

Rohlfs J. A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communi­

cations Service J] Bell Journal of Economics and Manage­

ment Science, 1974, 5 ( 1) i 1 6 - 3 7 .

Shapiro C ., Varian H. R. Information Rules • A Strategic Guide

to the Network Economy [M ] Boston! Harvard Business

School Press, 1999.

Bradenburger A. M. , Nalebuff B. J. Coopetitioni A Revolu­

tionary Mindset that Combines Competition and Co - operation

[M] . New York!Doubleday Publication Pres, 1996.

Classification model of knowledge - intensive goods driven by value realization

Gu Yuanxun1, Shi Yingying1, Xiao Zhongdong2 ( 1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China;

2 . School of Management, X i’ an Jiaotong University, X i’ an 710049, China)

Abstract; The classification of Knowledge - Intensive Goods ( KIG) is the research fundation of KIG management. Through the

classification of KIG, the structure and the characteristics of KIG can be described more clearly than simply regarded the KIG as

a homogenous product. Therefore, according to the value realization processes, classification results can help academics and prac­

titioners to profoundy understand the differences and the management strategies of different types, which will build a base for the

KIG management research. At the beginning, two independent classification dimensions, i. e. customer type and product shape

related to value realization of KIGs are proposed, the process of value realization where the complexity of delivery was emphasized

and subsequently probed into, the whole KIG area can be consequently divided into four basic quadrants, namely, collectivity -

customization goods, individual - customization goods, collectivity - standard goods, and individual - standard goods as the re­

sults of the classification. Furthermore, the value growth points and realization mechanisms of each type KIG are pointed out by

comparing different types. Based on the classification model, the corresponding marketing and development strategy can be pro­

posed for different KIG types. The classification study of KIG could simplify the management and research process, improve the

efficiency of researchers and managers, and provide an analysis framework for exploring the management strategy of different KIG

types.

Key words I knowledge - intensive goods; classification; product shape; customer type; delivery

© 1994-2011 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved, http://www.cnki.net

ttWcmwmmMMto

i r a i , # f f l ? J M t « , M I 2011 ^ 0 4 M 01 0

80RMB/j^o

/ u o n ^ o ^ o i m

, O h * W 010 - 62555521 „

^ 8712 jmn £ i : A f t £ : m m m m ) m r n m

2 0 1 1 ^ 0 3 ^ 25 0 *

? 4 m w n ( m i j )

2011 ^ 4 ft fjl 32 # % 4 M

[ % n 2 0 H i t i i K )

tb US: < f t © r e s > a m $ P(fe iS :010 -62555521J b « f l f ? S jS E + ^ t t * S & 5 5 4§- 8712 f g f g ,100080

t r $ £ t :

Hrt^C— W-i-: CN 11 - 1567/G3

ep J©l:ISSN 1000 -2995

£ f t : J f t f l l f t# : 2-5 05

± IS--Vntj. mm- B f l ' f J - f : BM610

Sltft :20.00 7n