middle-state-2018-selfstudy.pdf - California University of ...
california state university, northridge rehearsing and ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
2 -
download
0
Transcript of california state university, northridge rehearsing and ...
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE
REHEARSING AND PERFORMING FOUR PIECES FROM
SERGEI PROKOFIEV’S
ROMEO AND JULIET, SUITES 1&2, OP. 64
A graduate project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
For the degree of Master of Music
in Music, Conducting
By
Talynn Kuyumjian
December 2016
ii
The graduate project of Talynn Kuyumjian is approved:
__________________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Diane Roscetti Date __________________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Lorenz Gamma Date
__________________________________________ ____________________ Dr. John Roscigno, chair Date
California State University, Northridge
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Signature Page……………………………………………………………………………ii
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………...iv
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….1
Historical Background…………………………………………………………………….2
Selection of Movements and Score Study………………………………………………...5
The Rehearsal Process…………………………………………………………………….8
The Montagues and Capulets……………………………………………………..8
Juliet, The Young Girl…………………………………………………………....10
Romeo and Juliet…………………………………………………………………11
Death of Tybalt…………………………………………………………………..17
Performance……………………………………………………………………………...21
Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………..22
Appendix A: Musical Examples…………………………………………………………23
Appendix B: Concert Program…………………………………………………………..26
iv
ABSTRACT
REHEARSING AND PERFORMING FOUR PIECES FROM SERGEI PROKOFIEV’S
ROMEO AND JULIET, SUITES 1&2, OP. 64
By
Talynn Kuyumjian
Master of Music in Music, Conducting
This paper will describe the final project completed by the author for the partial
fulfillment of the degree of Master of Music in Orchestral Conducting. The orchestra that
played under the author’s baton was the CSUN Youth Philharmonic Orchestra – a high-
level youth orchestra consisting of musicians ranging from ages ten to eighteen – with
supervision from Dr. John Roscigno, professor of Orchestral Studies at CSUN. The
performance took place on Sunday, March 6, 2016, at the Plaza del Sol Performance Hall
on the school campus.
The purpose of this project was to rehearse the orchestra and prepare them to
perform a piece from the classical repertoire live in concert, with a length of
approximately twenty to twenty-five minutes. Possible pieces were discussed, and
eventually, it was decided that they would play four movements from Sergei Prokofiev’s
Romeo and Juliet Ballet score.
After long hours of score study, it became obvious that the rehearsal process
would be arduous and challenging; not only is the music technically difficult to play, but
v
Prokofiev writes in the extreme ranges of each instrument, making intonation one of the
major issues to deal with in rehearsal.
After a brief introduction, the paper is divided into four parts – historical
background, selection of movements, rehearsal process, and performance. Each section
will give an insight into this monumental orchestral work, and the main body of the paper
will discuss the details of anticipated issues with the orchestra and how they were dealt
with in rehearsal.
The concert program also included a violin concerto by Bruch and a symphony by
Beethoven. It was a demanding concert, but the brilliant and talented young musicians of
this orchestra pulled through and gave a spectacular performance.
1
Introduction
This graduate project included a series of rehearsals and a final performance by
Talynn Kuyumjian for her orchestral project in partial fulfillment for her Masters of
Music degree in Orchestral Conducting under the direction of Dr. John Roscigno at
California State University, Northridge. About a year before starting on the project,
possible pieces to conduct were discussed. My favorite composers are mostly Russian; so
I ultimately decided on a work by Sergei Prokofiev. I presented a performance of four
movements from Sergei Prokofiev’s Romeo and Juliet Ballet, performed by the CSUN
Youth Philharmonic Orchestra, a group of talented young musicians ranging from ages
eleven to eighteen, for their second concert of the season on the sixth of March, two
thousand and sixteen at the Plaza del Sol Performance Hall. This concert also included
the first movement of the Violin Concerto in G Minor by Max Bruch and Ludwig van
Beethoven’s Symphony No. 5. It was apparent from the beginning that this was going to
be an arduous and challenging, but also an exciting program for the musicians.
This paper will discuss the process of studying and preparing Prokofiev’s
impressive score for rehearsal, focusing on areas like tempo, articulation, balance, and
intonation. Because this is music composed for ballet, it was important for me to fully
understand the emotions of each of the movements and which scenes of the ballet they
relate to, then explain to the orchestra how to convey those emotions to the audience.
After providing a brief historical background, the methods of preparation and final results
will be discussed in this paper in three parts: selection of movements and score study, the
rehearsal process, and the final performance.
2
Historical Background
Before working on the music for Romeo and Juliet, Sergei Prokofiev had
voluntarily exiled himself from Soviet Russia, living in Paris and the United States. In
Paris, he worked with the renowned Sergei Diaghilev of the Ballets Russes. They met in
1914, and had they never met, Prokofiev might not have written any ballet music at all;
he grew up in an environment where symphonies and operas were much more
respectable, and ballet was seen only as a “frivolous form of applied art.”1 In turn,
Diaghilev tried to convince him otherwise, that opera is a dying art and “contemporary
taste demands ballet and pantomime.”2 Only after seeing how enthusiastically European
audiences and critics responded to Ballet Russes productions did he begin to seriously
consider writing ballet music himself. Diaghilev produced a few of his short ballets, like
Le Pas D’Acier (1925) and The Prodigal Son (1929), and this did a great deal to enhance
Prokofiev’s reputation in Europe. It was Diaghilev’s death in 1929 and the collapse of the
Ballet Russes that initiated Prokofiev’s return to Russia, where he believed he would be
successful composing more ballet music.
Romeo and Juliet was his initial attempt at a full-length ballet and the first time he
had written music “on such a profound and human theme.”3 He had recently also scored
for film and theater music, which helped him to illustrate visual images more effectively
1 Harlow Robinson, trans., Selected Letters of Sergei Prokofiev (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1998), 61. 2 Victor Seroff, Sergei Prokofiev: A Soviet Tragedy (New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1968), 80. 2 Victor Seroff, Sergei Prokofiev: A Soviet Tragedy (New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1968), 80. 3 Israel Nestyev, Sergei Prokofiev: His Musical Life, trans. Rose Prokofieva (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1946), 146.
3
and “physically—as in the fight scenes.”4 It has a large instrumentation that is fairly
standard (piccolo, 2 flutes, 2 oboes, English horn, bassoon, 4 horns, cornet, 2 trumpets, 3
trombones, tuba, timpani, strings), with a great variety of percussion instruments
(triangle, tambourine, xylophone, glockenspiel, snare drum, cymbal, bass drum). A
saxophone and celesta were also included, which were unusual instruments to have in the
orchestra during the time.
The history of this music is somewhat of a rocky and complex one, suffering a
“number of setbacks that have never been fully explained.”5 Sergei Prokofiev first
completed the music for the Romeo and Juliet ballet in 1935 for the Kirov Ballet (now
the Mariinsky Ballet) based in the city of Leningrad (St. Petersburg) working with theater
critic Adrian Piotrovsky and the company’s artistic director, Sergei Radlov, known for
his productions of Shakespearean works. Originally, Prokofiev had composed a happy
ending for William Shakespeare’s characters, but production of it never started because a
jovial ending of the story of the two lovers could have sparked unnecessary controversy
within a tyrannical government. He changed the story to the original ending and signed a
contract with the Bolshoi Ballet in Moscow (because of political turmoil, the location had
to be changed). After consulting over the music, the company decided that it was too
difficult to dance to, and they broke the contract.
After these rejections, Prokofiev extracted parts from the full ballet and put
together two orchestral suites, which were premiered before the ballet was ever staged.
Their first premiere was in Chicago in January 1937, where Prokofiev himself conducted
4 Harlow Robinson, Sergei Prokofiev: A Biography (New York: Viking, 1987), 304. 5 Karen Bennett, “Prokofiev’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and Socialist Realism: A Case Study in Inter-Semiotic Translation,” Shakespeare and European Politics (2008): 2.
4
the Chicago Symphony Orchestra to critical acclaim; the premiere was followed closely
by performances in Paris and Moscow.
Following this success, the ballet was finally premiered on stage, not in the Soviet
Union, but in Brno, Czechoslovakia (Czech Republic) in 1938, after the Leningrad Ballet
School had dishonored its agreement to premiere it in 1937. It finally made its debut in
Moscow with the Kirov Ballet in January of 1940 under artistic director Leonid
Lavrovsky. But it ultimately achieved success after it was staged with the Bolshoi Ballet
in 1946, which is when Prokofiev decided to put together a third orchestral suite.
Today, Prokofiev’s Romeo and Juliet is considered one of the greatest, if not the
best (in my opinion), full-length ballets, along with Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky’s Swan
Lake, The Nutcracker, and others. It is completely distinct from the ballets he wrote in
Paris, capturing the “psychological complexities”6 of each hero, with “clear cut musical
character portraits and realistic theatrical depiction of scenes.”7 The ballet is one of his
most popular works and has become a staple in the orchestral repertoire through the
numerous performances of his orchestral suites.
6 Nestyev, Prokofiev, 147. 7 Nestyev, Prokofiev, 147.
5
Selection of Movements and Score Study
One of the important components in determining which movements and in what
order they would be played was how to most effectively tell the story of Romeo and
Juliet within those few movements. Pieces from Suites 1 and 2 were chosen particularly
because they are more popular than the pieces in Suite 3.
One of the movements that I decided to include was the Montagues and Capulets,
the first piece from Suite 2. This movement, also known as Dance of the Knights,
impeccably establishes the “violent hostility”8 between the two haughty families, and
therefore was chosen as the introductory piece. It opens with dissonant horn and
trombone octaves that crescendo from mezzo forte to an explosive fortissimo chord (a B-
flat chord on top of an F chord with an added E) with timpani, snare drum, and bass drum
rolls, winds and brass all in their extreme ranges. This chord is suddenly cut off and a
pianissimo B minor chord emerges, then moves to D and resolves on G minor by the
strings. These opening chords immediately set the tension of the piece – impending doom
and sadness. After another set of similar chords, the well-known main theme begins, with
its dotted rhythm. The piece is in ternary form, with the flute taking on a sweeter
variation of the main theme in the contrasting middle section.
The next piece on the program was Romeo and Juliet, the sixth movement from
Suite 1. This is one of the central themes in the entire ballet, “tinged with a gentle,
restrained sadness, with quiet, hidden emotions, transparent and silvery tones
8 Robinson, Prokofiev: Biography, 303.
6
dominating,”9 and lays the foundation of love between Romeo and Juliet. Even though it
starts off in the key of C, it shifts around to different tonal centers and key signatures
throughout the entire piece. This helps suggest the imminent sadness that will occur
between the two lovers. Tremolo violin and viola chords, doubled with the harp and low
flute and clarinet notes, give it a delicate, shimmery opening and this occurs often
throughout the movement with the first violins, low strings, and brass instruments playing
the melodies.
For the final movement, I elected to have a thrilling rather than calm ending. The
Death of Tybalt, movement 7 from Suite 1, was chosen as the closing piece for the
performance, as it closes with the full orchestra striking fortissimo chords with their
instruments. This movement is very exciting and fast paced, and tempos are set starting at
precipitato, shifting to presto, and ending with adagio drammatico in the dramatic key of
C minor. This scene depicts the fight between Romeo and Juliet’s cousin, the “proud and
vindictive”10 Tybalt. They are fighting with swords, kicking each other and falling down,
so the music is extremely agitated and aggressive, ending with powerful chords.
I decided there should be at least one more movement to make it a complete piece
for performance. The options were Juliet, The Young Girl from Suite 2, or Masks from
Suite 1. With consultation from my professor, I decided to go with Juliet, The Young
Girl, the second movement from Suite 2. This movement is very lively and pleasant,
depicting the light-hearted, joyful Juliet flittering around her room with the “vivacity of a
9 Nestyev, Prokofiev, 147. 10 Nestyev, Prokofiev, 148.
7
young animal.”11 It takes a lot of tempo changes, alternating vivace and espressivo, with
tranquil passages including clarinet and flute solos. This was chosen instead of Masks,
since it was evident that it would be very challenging to conduct, as well as play for the
young musicians.
11 Karen Bennet, “Star-Cross’d Lovers: Shakespeare and Prokofiev’s ‘Pas De Deux’ in Romeo and Juliet,” The Cambridge Quarterly Vol. 32 No. 4 (2003): 317.
8
The Rehearsal Process
This section will cover all the “problem spots” and how they were rehearsed,
going through the pieces in order. It was clear from the start that with a highly chromatic
piece like this, and with many instruments playing in their extreme ranges, intonation was
likely to be of the highest concern. Many tempo changes occur throughout these pieces; it
was critical for me to point out these areas to the group and ask them to circle the changes
on their sheet music and to look up each time they saw a tempo change come up so they
play exactly with me. Due to the technicality level of the young musicians, there were
sections I knew I would have to rehearse slowly as the indicated tempos are to play very
quickly. Dotted and offbeat rhythms had to be given special attention, since dotted
rhythms are often rushed, and the players are usually late on their offbeat entrances.
These are common problems that can occur with a youth orchestra that I would have to
anticipate and be prepared for before rehearsals begin, whereas with professionals, a
conductor would not run into as many obstacles.
Montagues and Capulets
The beginning of Montagues and Capulets opens with very loud chords in the
winds and brass, followed by very soft string chords. The four horns enter first in octaves,
so during rehearsal, they were asked to hold each of the notes and tune carefully. As the
trombones and trumpets enter, the chord all together becomes more dissonant, so they
were asked to hold out each of their notes to get used to the dissonance and not be afraid
to play out. The string chords needed to be tuned as well. The tempo is very slow here
9
(q=50) and different string instruments change notes at different times, so the cues had to
be given very clearly to each individual section.
Example 1. Montagues and Capulets – four bars before Rehearsal 2, strings
Starting in the Allegro pesante, I really wanted weight and heaviness, so I asked
the horns and tuba to play full-length quarter notes, and also the violas and basses to use
their entire bows on every single quarter note. Something that I did not anticipate was the
tendency of rushing of the melody in the violins. I had to make sure that they were
playing the dotted rhythm correctly, as they were starting the rhythm correctly but
gradually moving to a triplet pattern. This was crucial since the horns and trombones had
upcoming eighth note melodies and by rushing, the sound would not be as heavy as
desired. Therefore, it was important for me to also look weighty in order to keep a slow,
marching pace.
In the slow, moderato tranquillo section at rehearsal 7, I had to ensure the flute
melody was heard clearly. The flute solo is marked piano, but I asked her to play a full
mezzo forte, asked everyone else to play very softly, and requested that the violas listen to
the flute and move their glissandi exactly with flute melody (see Appendix A, Example
A1 for full score).
10
Out of all the movements, this one was the least challenging to conduct and for
the students to play.
Juliet, The Young Girl
Because this movement is very fast, I chose to have the students play it at a
slower tempo, roughly at q=112, for the first few rehearsals. I wanted this movement to
sound very light and bright, so I asked the violins to play their staccato notes in the
beginning very short and bouncy, and for the rest of the string instruments to really play
out their pizzicato notes. The wind instruments were asked to hit their staccato notes
“percussively” in order to help give it a bright and articulate sound.
One challenge in this particular movement was the observation of all the tempo
changes. As mentioned before, this piece alternates between fast and moderate tempo
sections, with a slow middle section. I had all the musicians circle the tempo markings on
their scores and asked them to make sure to look up at the conductor whenever they saw
a tempo change coming up in order for the orchestra to achieve precision.
There were almost no problems in the fast, vivace sections. The slower sections
brought on a lot of balance issues. For example, at rehearsal 57, I had to ask all the string
players to play absolutely pianissimo so that the wind solos could seep through to the
audience. Although the clarinet and flute solos in these sections were marked piano, I
asked them to play their passages forte.
11
Example 2. Juliet, The Young Girl – Rehearsal 57
This movement was mostly conducted in four, but I decided to conduct
subdivided four in the last four measures; the rhythm really slows down here, so by
subdividing, I was able to show the solo harp and saxophone passages how to clearly play
their sixteenth notes.
Romeo and Juliet
It was expected that balance and intonation issues were going to be the central
concerns in this movement. Sections where the entire orchestra plays together had to be
tuned; viola and cello players really needed to focus on their parts, as they had melodies
that went into the treble clef range, and many of the students had never played notes in
that range before. Rehearsals with string players only came in very handy for practicing
these parts.
The first section that I really focused on was at rehearsal 52, where an almost
contrapuntal melody begins with a solo first violin, second violin, and viola. The viola
12
begins its melody on an A-flat, and the soloist had difficulty finding this pitch. I had her
sustain her note with the first violin, an A-flat one octave higher, so they could tune. I
then told the soloist to start softly by listening to the pitch of the first violin so that she
would be able to come in on the right pitch. I had the violins and violas play this passage
quite a few times for the accuracy of intonation.
Example 3. Romeo and Juliet – Rehearsal 52, strings
The next section that I focused on rehearsing with the strings was at rehearsal 53.
Here, the tempo suddenly shifts from q=46 to q=120, and the strings have to play sul
ponticello. The time signature here constantly shifts from 2/4 to 3/4, so I explained to the
players that they have to be alert and keep counting. There is also a two measure poco
ritardando that switches back to a tempo, where I had to remind the players many times
to look up at me so that they would all stay together during the change of tempo. As you
see in the example, the poco ritardando is above a group of 16th and 32nd notes. I asked
the first violins to apply a lot of bow pressure into those first three 16th notes and not play
them in haste.
13
Example 4. Romeo and Juliet – Rehearsal 53
After this segment, at rehearsal 54, the tempo slows down to an andante (q=84).
All four horns enter with a chromatic harmonic progression, changing chords from C, to
B, to B-flat. As can be seen in the next example, they are on beats 2, 3, and 4, so I had all
of them hold each of the chords, for a few seconds. This way, they listened to each other
and were able to tune their notes accordingly.
Example 5. Romeo and Juliet – Rehearsal 54, French horns
14
The cellos then come in with the main melodic theme of the piece. Here is where
the cello notes go up to the treble clef. Many of the musicians nearly panicked when they
saw this and their sound did not resonate enough. It was important for them to play out
here as they have the main melody. In order to obtain a full, rich sound out of them, I told
the cellists to relax, use their full bows and not be afraid to vibrate. This really helped
with getting a warm, sonorous texture out of them.
Example 6. Romeo and Juliet – 4th-7th bars of Rehearsal 54, low strings
Around rehearsal 56 is where the entire orchestra plays together for the first time
in this movement. This part was completely out of tune after listening to a rehearsal
recording. In order to repair this, I had the members of the orchestra sustain the notes
they had in the beginning. It starts off on a C chord. I asked all members who have a C
(the root) to play first, then all who have a G (the fifth), and finally all who have an E (the
third). I have learned this method of tuning from Dr. Roscigno, and it has proved very
effective, as it allows the third to be adjusted in accordance to the perfect fifth. I also had
the orchestra tune the A-flat chord that occurs a few measures after.
It was also important in this part for the orchestra to play in time; after listening
through a run-through of the movement, I could not tell if the orchestra was playing
together, so I had to take it apart. I first rehearsed the violins, who have tremolo eighth
notes, asking them to play softly in order to give this part a “shimmery” sound. Then I
15
asked the woodwinds to join in with their dotted figures. I wanted to ensure they were all
moving at the same time because their rhythms are in unison. Finally, I asked the violas
and cellos to join in; they all have triplets. Because there is so much going on, it was
crucial for all the sections of the orchestra to stay exactly with my beat (see Appendix A,
Example A2 for full score).
Since this movement is highly romantic, I aimed to be very expressive and take
my time conducting the melodic lines in certain places. One of those parts occurs when
the violins and violas play one of the themes in their extreme ranges (see following
example). I asked the musicians to write down “look up” on their parts here, telling them
that I will be holding the tempo back on the third beat and greatly expanding the time.
This required me to close both my arms and open them with a lot of resistance.
Example 7. Romeo and Juliet – 2nd-5th bars of Rehearsal 58, strings
Rehearsal 60 was a section that I was not expecting to have a lot of issues with,
but the balance was completely off here. It was another part that I had to divide into
sections in rehearsal to work out the sound. The first violins have the melody here, while
16
the basses hold an E-flat pedal, the flute and clarinet play arpeggiated chords, and the
violas and cellos provide harmonic structure. When I listened to professional recordings
of this movement, it almost sounds as if the violas and cellos were not even playing,
whereas in my rehearsal, those instruments were very loud and almost distracting. I asked
them to play extremely soft using the tip of their bows, almost at zero volume. Even
though the first violins have a piano marked here in their part, I told them they could play
mezzo piano in order to bring out the melody. The flute and clarinet players were asked to
play at a mezzo piano volume as well and play their 16th notes smoothly and with fluidity.
This solved the balance issue in rehearsal.
Example 8. Romeo and Juliet – Rehearsal 60
Other intonation issues in this piece occurred when the first violins went
extremely high above the staff. Having them play their passages slowly and listening to
each other really helped get their notes in tune.
17
Many times throughout this movement, brass instruments such as the horns,
trumpets, and trombones have the melody lines. During rehearsal, many of them were shy
to play their parts with confidence. I had them circle their dynamic markings wherever
they have the melodic line marked forte and molto espressivo. Asking them to play full,
round notes helped them give a sonorous sound to the melodies.
As expected, this movement took the longest time in rehearsals mostly because of
balance and intonation problems.
Death of Tybalt
This movement, although very challenging to play for musicians to play, was
fairly simple to conduct. The tempo stays q=160 for the entire first half, changes to q=168
in the middle, and q=48 for the ending section. The challenging aspect for me in this
movement was the cueing of instruments, especially for the winds, brass, and percussion,
who all enter at different times with short melodic figures. I wanted this movement to be
played very aggressively by all the instrumentalists, as it is the musical accompaniment to
a very exciting and intense sword fight between Romeo and Tybalt. After explaining to
the musicians what happens in the scene, I asked them to pretend that their best friend
had just been murdered in front of their eyes and that their only mission now was to kill
their friend’s murderer. Their parts are all marked with directions like fortissimo, con
brio, and furioso. Hence, it would be suitable for them to play angrily. Asking the
orchestra to play as percussively as possible on all accented notes, even to sometimes be
obnoxiously forceful on some parts, also aided in keeping up the energy of the piece.
Because the piece’s tempo is extremely fast, I had the musicians play at slower tempos
18
for the first few rehearsals in order for them to clearly learn their parts. Following those
sessions, I started to increase the tempo each time.
I expected the violas would have trouble with their entrance; requesting them not
to rush into their opening sixteenth notes and rather to wait the entire length of an eighth
note assisted them in being in time with the cellos and basses.
Example 9. Death of Tybalt – 1st-4th bars, violas and cellos
One place where I anticipated a rhythmic problem starts around rehearsal 64,
where the horns start playing on off-beats. I had them follow my baton’s click and to
listen to the tuba and timpani, who play on the beats. I also had them sustain each of the
chords, as they move up and down chromatically. This happens a couple more times
throughout the first half, and having the orchestra sustain each of the different chords
consequently improved the intonation.
Example 10. Death of Tybalt – Rehearsal 64, horns, low brass, and timpani
19
Rehearsal 69 was another area of expected rhythmic problems with the violins.
They enter with quick, little bursts of two thirty second notes-eighth note figures in
unison, but start to play off of each other after a measure. The second violins kept playing
the first violin rhythm. I had to explain this rhythm to them, as they clearly did not know
that this was the case. I had them practice it slowly, and then little by little, increased the
tempo. It took a few rehearsals to get this rhythm correct, but they finally were able to
execute it. It was extremely important for me to cue the second violins where they break
off from the rhythm of the first violins; this way, the violinists felt “safer” about the
section.
Example 11. Death of Tybalt – Rehearsal 69, violins
For the last adagio drammatico section, I decided to conduct at a tempo of q=60
instead of the marked slower q=48; since we were only performing the music (there were
no dancers on stage), I felt this necessary in order not to drag out the movement and to
keep the dramatic mood alive. I changed my beat pattern to a subdivided three here in
order to get a march-like effect from the orchestra, and then went into a legato three
pattern for the entrance of the horns and trumpets while still clicking each beat. This
helped keep everyone playing marcato style while the horns and trumpets played their
melody smoothly. Once again, the orchestra ran into a balance issue in this section. At the
20
entrance of the horn melody, I asked everyone to lower their dynamics from a fortissimo
to a forte in order for the melody to come through to the audience. The horns and
trumpets were asked to play using all their breath, as their parts here are marked
fortissimo, espressivo e drammatico (see Appendix A, Example A3 for full score).
21
Performance
By the day of the performance, I had decided to memorize all four movements. As
the conductor, I feel more comfortable not having to turn pages; also, I get to really show
character and emotion with my body when I am not distracted from looking at the score. I
learned all the areas where tempos and meters change, and more importantly, memorized
all the crucial cues.
It was clear that the musicians were a little nervous about performing the piece,
but also excited and filled with adrenaline. This caused the orchestra to rush the theme of
Montagues and Capulets, but they were more relaxed for Juliet, The Young Girl and
Romeo and Juliet. For Death of Tybalt, I had to make sure I was extremely precise with
my clicks and cueing in order for the musicians to stay together, since this was the most
technically challenging movement out of the four.
The performance overall was very successful, and I was extremely proud of these
young musicians who pulled through and played one of the most difficult pieces of music
in orchestral repertoire. It had been a dream of mine to conduct the music of Sergei
Prokofiev, and I am very thankful and honored that Dr. Roscigno gave me the
opportunity to work with these talented musicians.
22
Bibliography
Bennett, Karen. “Prokofiev’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and Socialist Realism: A Case Study in Inter-Semiotc Translation.” Shakespeare and European Politics (2008): 1-12.
Bennett, Karen. “Star-Cross’d Lovers: Shakespeare and Prokofiev’s ‘Pas De Deux’ in
Romeo and Juliet.” The Cambridge Quarterly Vol. 32 No. 4 (2003): 311-347. Nestyev, Israel. Sergei Prokofiev: His Musical Life. Translated by Rose Prokofieva. New
York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1946. Prokofiev, Sergei. Romeo and Juliet, 1st Suite (Conductor’s Score). New York: Edwin F.
Kalmus, 1970. Prokofiev, Sergei. Romeo and Juliet, 2nd Suite (Conductor’s Score). New York: Edwin F.
Kalmus, 1970. Robinson, Harlow, trans. Selected Letters of Sergei Prokofiev. Boston: Northeastern
University Press, 1998. Robinson, Harlow. Sergei Prokofiev: A Biography. New York: Viking, 1987. Seroff, Victor. Sergei Prokofiev: A Soviet Tragedy. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1968.