Building IT capabilities: learning by doing
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Building IT capabilities: learning by doing
Building IT capabilities: learning by doing
Traci A. Cartea∗, Ajantha Dharmasirib and Travis Pererab
aDivision of MIS, Michael F. Price College of Business, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019,USA; bPostgraduate Institute of Management, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are ubiquitous in much of the developedworld. With the growing interest in business process outsourcing, further deployment of thesetechnologies in developing countries is a valuable economic development tool. Unfortunately,digital inequity, stemming from shortcomings in National Information Infrastructure as wellas lack of IT skills, language barriers, and illiteracy often constrain ICT adoption and use indeveloping countries. The case study presented here focuses on an e-learning initiative withinSri Lanka. A key government ministry selected 150 of its employees for inclusion in a hybridlearning post-graduate diploma program in public administration. While this program doesnot focus on teaching information technology skills, its hybrid context provides the addedbenefit of developing technology skills among participants. We followed the participants ofthe program from start to finish. Using a combination of quantitative and qualitative data,we found that over the course of the program, participants became more aware of Internetavailability and female participants displayed improvements in computer self-efficacy.These results suggest hybrid learning programs, such as the one studied may indeed serveto simultaneously deliver content and improve IT skills and awareness.
Keywords: digital inequity; e-learning; content-based instruction; technology adoption;computer self-efficacy
1. Introduction
Digital inequity refers to unequal access to and use of information and communication technol-
ogies (ICTs) (DiMaggio, Hargittai, Celeste, & Shafer, 2004). Some previous work (Van Dijk &
Hacker, 2003) has focused on the access to part of this definition, suggesting the development of
a National Information Infrastructure (NII) and the corresponding improvements in technology
access address the key digital inequality hurdle. Infrastructural development is a necessary
element of closing the digital gap and such efforts are steeped in policy decisions and cultural
norms (Garfield & Watson, 1997). However, we argue that the use of element of the above defi-
nition is more difficult. Individual citizens wishing to be competitive locally and abroad,
especially in governmental and business-oriented positions need to know how to use technology
(Hsieh, Rai, & Keil, 2008), suggesting the development of an NII is a necessary, but not a suffi-
cient condition for shrinking the digital divide. Governmental efforts need to also focus on
developing the complementary IT skills needed to leverage the infrastructure investments.
Developing knowledge and skills about ICT is fundamental to any development effort
focused on securing a greater role within the information society for a developing country
and its citizens (Avgerou, Navarra, Miller, Sahay, & Volkow, 2003). Such skill development
can result in access to better and more timely information, better decision-making, and
ISSN 0268-1102 print/ISSN 1554-0170 online
# 2011 Commonwealth Secretariat
DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2011.604083
http://www.informaworld.com
∗Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]ıd Assar is the accepting Associate Editor for this article.
Information Technology for Development
Vol. 17, No. 4, October 2011, 289–305
citizen empowerment (Bhatnagar, 2000). The importance of human capital development in any
governmental development effort is featured in global policy meetings and academic research
symposia (Bada & Madon, 2006). Training and education initiatives can be useful techniques
for developing ICT skills and, as such, human capital.
It has been suggested that simply by exposing individuals in developing countries to basic
forms of technology over a period of time can lead them to learning, adapting, and developing
the needed skills to benefit from ICTs (Musa, 2006). Technology is often a formal medium of
instruction – especially in distance education settings. However, and perhaps more importantly,
individuals around the world are increasingly being exposed to technology, especially the Inter-
net, as a source of information about the world. In light of the increasing role, IT is playing in the
everyday lives of individuals perhaps ICT education could be facilitated by more explicitly
recognizing technology’s usefulness both as the medium and the message. Content-based
instruction (CBI), often used in the teaching of a foreign language, is a curricular approach
intended to foster integration of medium and content (Crandall, 1993). In a foreign language
context, this might take the form of teaching a social studies class in Spanish fostering academic
growth (specifically in student social studies knowledge), while simultaneously improving
Spanish language proficiency.
There is some support in the IT literature for the notion that CBI may be a useful instruc-
tional technique for teaching IT skills; interestingly this support comes from studies focused on
recreational use of IT. For example, Hsieh et al. (2008) found that entertainment was a key
motivating factor for the digitally disadvantaged to use IT. Other researchers have linked rec-
reational use of IT to educational outcomes (Belanger & Van Slyke, 2000; Prensky, 2004). In
the context of ICT education, CBI may be viewed as part of a form versus function debate. One
may engage in formal ICT instruction or functional ICT instruction. In formal instruction, one
might learn about the Internet by demonstrating understanding of Transfer Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) protocol and n-tier client server architectures. In a functional
alternative, the student instead uses the Internet (an n-tier client server architecture running a
TCP/IP protocol) to download information, participate in chat forums and upload homework
for a course in management. In the former example, the student likely demonstrates a more
formal understanding and in the latter a more functional one (as well as an improved under-
standing of the intended management concepts).
If CBI is an appropriate lens to apply to technology instruction, then e-learning programs
may provide a valuable building block to bridging the digital divide by improving IT skill
sets via the simultaneous improvement in skills associated with both the medium and instruc-
tional context. In order to evaluate this premise, we followed the progress of students through
a hybrid-learning-based program in Sri Lanka. This post-graduate diploma program in public
administration included 150 employees of a key ministry who were selected to participate.
The coursework was focused on developing managerial skills in the participants that could be
immediately put to use in the public sector careers. Thus, our research question is:
Can an e-learning educational context be useful in developing improved IT skills without explicitlyteaching IT?
In this paper, we present quantitative and qualitative findings from an 18-month hybrid-learning
program we followed. Surveys were used to capture participants’ attitudes toward technology
and self-efficacy beliefs toward technology at the beginning and end of the program. Further,
interviews were conducted to understand the process by which the program unfolded and the
students’ response to that process. The results suggest that hybrid-learning programs can posi-
tively impact IT skills and attitudes without expressly teaching IT. The researchers were partici-
pant observers, and our data are collected from a single program. As such, the research is best
290 T.A. Carte et al.
viewed as a case study from which findings are extracted, but need additional testing in a more
generalizable setting. The following sections provide a literature review, background on Sri
Lanka’s educational system and e-learning and distance education efforts, the program, our
study design and methods, and finally our findings and recommendations.
2. Literature review
CBI has been defined as “the teaching of content or information in the language being learning
with little or no direct or explicit effort to teach the language itself separately from the content
being taught” (Richards & Rodgers, 2001, p. 204). Such an approach emphasizes learning about
something versus learning a language (or a technology) and acknowledges that a key purpose of
language learning (like ICT learning) is to facilitate the communication of meaning. In the
context of second language instruction, the distinction is made between acquisition (a process
tied to first language development, whereby very small children acquire language through
everyday interactions with their world) and learning (more closely linked to second-language
development, whereby language skills are developed through formal instruction) with some
researchers concluding that acquisition is more effective (Krashen, 1985).
Some ICT education researchers have long acknowledged the value of CBI in the ICT
context noting that “ICT literacy is . . . a secondary effect of content-related ICT use”
(Tondeur, Van Braak, & Valcke, 2007, p. 964) and advocate the educational use of ICT be
embedded within content-related ICT use. Prior studies have linked content-related ICT use
in secondary education to fostering collaborative learning, adding flexibility to the learning
process, and providing cross-cultural opportunities (Van Braak, 2001). While ICT skills are gen-
erally seen as a core competency needed to participate in the knowledge-based society (OECD/CERI, 2001). Previous work on ICT education is often not drawn upon by policy-makers when
developing curricula and guidelines for teachers on how to use ICT because there is a tendency
to think ICT is new and requires new learning ideas or techniques.
In this paper, we provide evidence that CBI or content-related ICT use can improve citizens’
awareness about ICT and their future willingness to use it. Such factors can lead to greater every-
day use and the development of skill sets that can enable citizens to compete more effectively in
the global economy. However, such skill development alone is insufficient to close the digital
divide, citizen also require sufficient access to technology and base literacy skills. In the follow-
ing section, we highlight our study’s context – Sri Lanka – indicating the state of the NII and
base literacy skills of its citizens.
3. Country background
Sri Lanka has a rich educational history built on the British education system stemming from its
colonial past. While the overall quality of education in the country is high – the literacy rate is
92%, and 83% of the total population have completed secondary education – only 10% are com-
puter literate (Abeysekera, 2008). The geographic distribution of computer literacy in Sri Lanka
as shown in Figure 1 is asymmetrical, suggesting potentially large IT payoffs from e-learning
opportunities.
The Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) recognized a need to better leverage IT and thus
adopted a national policy on ICTs and created the Information and Communication Technology
Agency in 2003. Highlighted in Table 1, a number of distance learning and e-learning initiatives
have been funded by or otherwise approved by the GOSL. Among these programs, the DEPS
program could be considered the forerunner for the methodology and administration of the Post-
graduate Diploma program studied here.
Information Technology for Development 291
NII enables the flow of data within and between countries. The development of NII is an
important part of any understanding of digital inequity as well as any effort to reduce such
inequities because NII provides access to ICTs. The term can be applied broadly to telephone
and cable television services as well as data communication networks that exist within a
nation (Garfield & Watson, 1997). For the purpose of this study, we limit our examination to
Sri Lanka’s data communication infrastructure.
Figure 1. Computer literacy.Source: Abeysekera (2008).
Table 1. Important distance education initiatives.
The Open University of Sri Lanka Provides higher educational opportunities to workingadults through the Distance Mode. Fully onlinecourses and supplementary courses from theFaculties of Engineering, Natural Sciences andHumanities and has an e-learning platformconnecting 38,896 registered sites with 16,927,590users in 1,713,438 courses (as of January 2008)
The Distance Learning Centre (DLC) in Colombo A node of the World Bank’s Global DevelopmentLearning Network (GDLN), facilitating distancelearning programs, provides decision-makers,mainly at middle to top management personnel inboth private and public sectors, regular andaffordable interaction with peers and experts acrossthe globe
The Distance Education Modernization Project(DEMP) of the Ministry of Education, SriLanka
Addresses the GOSL’s initiative to enhance humandevelopment in Sri Lanka. Aims to significantlyincrease access to post-secondary education in SriLanka through development of distance educationtechnologies (www.depp.lk)
The Distance Education for Publics Servants(DEPS) program
Adopted blended learning methods using printedmodules, CD ROM, e-mail communication, radioprograms and group learning sessions through atotal of 115 Group Learning Centers for publicservants island-wide
292 T.A. Carte et al.
According to the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka (TRCSL, 2009),
the e-mail and Internet subscriber base in Sri Lanka has seen a growth of 90% from 1996 to 2009.
Figure 2 contains the latest figures. Sri Lanka has a fiber optic network and also wireless solutions
offered by several telecommunication providers. It became the first country in South Asia to
introduce GSM, one of the most efficient technologies for mobile communication. Plans are
underway to obtain a communication satellite as a further expansion of ICT capability.
While Sri Lanka has endeavored to provide distance education and e-learning opportunities
for many years with varying levels of success, the current NII and rapidly improving opportu-
nities to gain access to the Internet suggest the current program may be well timed to produce
the desired learning results (i.e. improved public administration skills within the Ministry) as
well as to really accelerate IT literacy among this group of students who have ICT access like
no group of e-learning students before them.
We provide this background about Sri Lanka more to describe the context within which our
study was conducted than to suggest there is something unique about Sri Lanka precluding
others countries from successfully applying what was learned. Potentially unique about Sri
Lanka is a high literacy and education rate compared with the neighboring countries.
However, we believe the program studied provides a suitable sample for studying the problems
associated with a government rapidly pursuing such a development policy and the knowledge
gained in attempting to solve the problems encountered. In terms of generalizability,
UNESCO classifies Sri Lanka as a lower-middle income country (India is also in this category)
and we believe the usefulness of our findings may be greater for countries with similar levels of
economic development due to corresponding differences in populations’ exposure to technol-
ogy. Further, we believe the high literacy and education rates in Sri Lanka were an advantage
and our findings may be more applicable to countries similar in education.
4. The Postgraduate Diploma Program
The new 18-month Postgraduate Diploma in Public Administration offered by the Postgraduate
Institute of Management (PIM) affiliated to the University of Sri Jayewardenepura in Colombo,
Sri Lanka was developed to train 150 newly recruited graduates in the Ministry of Finance &
Planning who are expected to perform various executive level functions within the GOSL.
Figure 2. Email and Internet growth in Sri Lanka.Source: TRCSL (2009).
Information Technology for Development 293
The pilot program studied here was supported by a financial grant from the United Nations
Development Programme, could be extended subsequently to participants recruited from
other government institutions.
This is not a technology program. However, the GOSL recognizes a need to help equip the public
sector with the skills and competencies urgently needed to manage and administer forthcoming e-
government projects. Moreover, IT literacy levels within the GOSL are extremely low, even
though significant investments have been made in IT infrastructure. By employing a hybrid learning
method, including web uploaded textual material, interactive CD’s, group learning sessions, a web
forum and an e-journal, this program is likely to also improve the technology skills of participants.
It was expected that students invest substantial time in the technology-supported environ-
ment working with the course CDs and visiting the course website. The web forum was expected
to stimulate inter-group discussions. The e-journal provided news and information on confer-
ences, government decisions, implementation reports, and international events etc. Group learn-
ing sessions were hosted at PIM twice a month in 2 h durations. Faculty at PIM acted as group
facilitators and helped focus the sessions on group discussion of key concepts. Through multiple
choice quizzes administered monthly and other exercises, participants assessed their absorption
of knowledge. A final noteworthy feature of the program was the use of group leaders. At the end
of the first session, a leader for each group was appointed by the facilitator. Such leaders were
supposed to help lead the group learning sessions, and act as key coordinators linking with the
facilitators and administrators. They were rotated once in 6 months, in order to give leadership
opportunities for more.
5. Study design
Because we were fortunate enough to have full cooperation from the program leadership, we were
able to follow the initial cohort of this program from start to finish. As a result, we attempted to
design a set of research methods to capture both student experiences, as well as program
process effectiveness (highlighted in Figure 3). We began by capturing initial perceptions and
demographic information via a paper and pencil survey (translated into the native language),
we next interviewed key participants a few months into the program to gather information
about key program processes, and finally we surveyed the students again at the conclusion of
the program to try to understand the potential impact the program and its delivery methods had
on student perceptions of technology. Such a combination of qualitative and quantitative data cap-
tured over time provides a rich picture of the students’ experiences in the program.
5.1 Initial survey
Upon commencement of the program, the students completed a questionnaire which captured
demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, education, and Big-5 personality). It also included
Figure 3. Research design.
294 T.A. Carte et al.
items aimed at understanding Internet availability and computer self-efficacy (CSE). Previous
work clearly suggests that access to technology is a key input to digital equality. We included
one item in our survey focused on capturing Internet availability. We asked the participants
to rate on a seven-point Likert scale the following: “I can access the internet anytime I want
to” (Lee, Lee, & Kim, 2007). In addition, self-efficacy is the key to understanding digital
inequity for two reasons. First, it affects future plans to use IT (Eastin & LaRose, 2000).
Second, a lack of confidence, or self-efficacy, likely affects the digitally disadvantaged to a
greater extent than the digitally advantaged (Hsieh et al., 2008). We include a two-item CSE
scale adapted from Lee et al. (2007).
5.2 Interviews
Two months into the program, we convened a meeting of group leaders. They were asked to
come to the meeting prepared to represent the opinions and feelings of their group members.
Interview guide essentially consisted of the key issues they faced in using IT for their
program. Availability of Internet access was one such issue which was subsequently addressed
by the ministry officials.
5.3 Final survey
At the program’s conclusion, a second survey was administered containing the same measures of
Internet availability and CSE. In addition, the participants were asked their overall perception of
the use of IT in the program, their involvement with the program, and perceptions of facilitator
effectiveness.
5.3.1 Overall IT perception
Multiple theories (e.g. Theory of Reasoned Action, Technology Acceptance Model) that seek to
predict future IT usage suggest that attitude toward technology is a significant predictor of future
IT behavior (Azjen & Fishbein, 1980; Davis, 1989). We asked our participants a single question
(developed for this study) about their perceptions of IT at the end of the program to better under-
stand the role this program played in creating positive attitudes about IT.
5.3.2 Extent of use
Digital inequity stems from differences in access to and use of technology. As such, equity is
improved through improvements in access to technology and more frequent or deeper use of
technology. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) argues that an individual’s intention
to use technology is predicated on perceptions that it is useful and easy to use, and those percep-
tions are impacted by actually using the technology (Davis, 1989). We captured this with a set of
questions developed for this study that asked participants to report how often they: reviewed the
online forum report, emailed the members, facilitator and office, and used the CD (anchored at
rarely and very often).
5.3.3 Facilitator effectiveness
Previous studies suggest that management support, the degree to which an individual believes
that the management has committed to the successful implementation and use of a system,
can impact an individual’s perceived usefulness of a system (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008). In
our context, such support would likely come from meeting facilitators. These were the faculty
Information Technology for Development 295
at PIM who were responsible for guiding the students during the face-to-face meetings and also
for maintaining contact and facilitating interaction between meetings. As such, we measured
facilitator effectiveness using an adapted scale (Geisner & van Knippenberg, 2008).
Because this was an educational program, multiple-choice quizzes were given at regularly
scheduled intervals. The content of each quiz was specific to the program material for that
time period. Quiz results were made available by program administrators to be used as a
measure of performance in the program.
6. Data analysis and findings
Given the time-based nature of our methods, we present our analysis and interpretation chrono-
logically (separated into preliminary findings, intermediate findings, and findings at the end of
the program).
6.1 Preliminary findings: role of individual differences among program participants
Out of the 150 program participants, 122 completed our initial survey (for a response rate of
81.3%). Demographics (Table 2) show our sample to be predominantly female, Sinhalese,
over 30-years old, and possessing a bachelor’s degree.
We conducted multiple regression analysis using demographics (age, gender, education
level), Internet availability and personality1 as independent variables and quiz performance as
the dependent measure (performance on two multiple choice quizzes was available, results
reported here used quiz one data; however, results were consistent across both). The resulting
model was significant (F8, 106 ¼ 3.619, p ¼ 0.001); however, the variance explained was
modest (Adj. R2 ¼ 0.155). Significant in this model were age (b ¼ 20.249, t ¼ 22.768,
p ¼ 0.007), Internet availability (b ¼ 0.219, t ¼ 2.48, p ¼ 0.015), and to a lesser extent the
Big-5 personality dimension, openness to experience (b ¼ 20.191, t ¼ 21.906, p ¼ 0.059).
These preliminary results suggest that age is negatively related to course outcomes, Internet
availability is positively related to course outcomes, and the personality dimension, openness
to experience, is negatively related to course outcomes.
These findings early in the program provide some insight into what kind of individual is poten-
tially best suited to a hybrid learning experience. While gender was not a factor, younger students
seemed to be more able to adjust to the new learning environment (or perhaps it was less of an
adjustment for younger students). As expected, distance education requires technology access,
so students with Internet access were more successful than students without. Interestingly, stu-
dents whose personality was higher on the openness to experience were less successful. Openness
to experience has previously been linked to intention to use technologies whether the technology
was perceived to be useful or not suggesting that open people are likely to engage in technology
use to satisfy their curiosity or seek out new adventures rather than due to perceived utility
(Devaraj, Easley, & Crant, 2008). Consistent with this previous work, our participants
Table 2. Demographics (n ¼ 122).
Age (in years) Mean ¼ 35.8, SD ¼ 3.84
Ethnicity Sinhalese ¼ 118, other ¼ 4Gender Male ¼ 41, female ¼ 81Education level Bachelor’s degree ¼ 106
Master’s degree ¼ 12Other ¼ 4
296 T.A. Carte et al.
demonstrating higher openness to experience may have engaged in more exploration rather than
task-focused use of the system potentially resulting in poorer quiz performance.
6.2 Intermediate findings
In interviews, group leaders expressed (on the part of themselves and their teammates) consider-
able concern over a lack of Internet availability – consistent with our findings above. They saw
the Internet as the primary means of communication including: knowledge-sharing among par-
ticipants, follow up between facilitators and participants, and a primary delivery channel for
course content from the program to its participants. Time constraints were further identified
as barriers to success for many participants. While the Ministry endorsed their participation
in this program, and officially provided two hours’ leave from work every two weeks to
attend the group session, often local managers were asking that the time be made up. Finally,
some concerns were raised about the English language medium of instruction. Many students
were struggling; however, improving the English skills of these government employees is
seen as another important byproduct of the program by its administrators.
These leaders also offered several suggestions to address their concerns. For example, it was
suggested perhaps the leave time could be extended from two to four hours so that students could
either arrive at PIM early or stay a little later to use the IT center to work through modules,
engage in the forum, or use the online English tutorials. They also asked that the program admin-
istrators intervene on their behalf with Ministry officials to engender stronger support for their
participation in this program, including more consistent application of the official leave policy.
On a positive note, the students expressed an appreciation for the program, perceived the
content as immediately relevant, and believed developing their English skills important. One
interesting observation made by one leader was his perception that students in his groups
were demonstrating increased motivation to be successful in the program. When pressed for a
reason, he observed that for several members of his group Ministry officials were asking
about the program and its content. This ability to showcase their learning proved motivating.
Figure 4. Participant responses.
Information Technology for Development 297
In response to these suggestions, the program administrators were successful in getting the
students’ leave time extended to four hours so that IT facilities at PIM could be used. Further,
additional English language instruction was provided.
6.3 Findings at program conclusion
Once participants concluded their program of study, we administered another survey. On this,
we reassessed their perceptions of CSE, captured the extent to which participants used the
on-line tools provided, and asked their opinions of the faculty facilitators. We also asked for
their overall perceptions of the use of IT in this program. We specifically focused on participant
involvement and facilitator effectiveness because these were perceived to be factors over which
program administrators had some control; as such any significant findings would yield opportu-
nities for administrative actions that might add to the program’s overall success. In all, 75 usable
responses were received. Of these 75, only 65 had also responded to the initial survey. When
combined with responses to the first survey, 65 matched pairs were collected, resulting in an
overall response rate of 43.3%.
The students responded very favorably to the use of IT in this program (Figure 4). Further,
their perceptions of Internet availability improved over the course of the program, perhaps due to
the increase in leave time. The students’ responses to this question at the beginning and end of
the program are shown in Figure 5. As shown, the percentage of students who strongly agreed
with the statement “During the program I was able to access the Internet anytime I wanted”
increased from about 20% to almost 40% over the course of the program with way more than
half the students either strongly agreeing or agreeing. Further, less than 5% of the students dis-
agreed or strongly disagreed with this statement in the end, compared with close to 30% at the
beginning.
6.3.1 Measurement assessment
Given, we had a number of multi-item perceptual scales, we next turn our attention to construct
validity and reliability. Factor analysis using principal components analysis and a varimax
rotation results and reliability calculations are provided in Table 3. Some items cross-loaded
Figure 5. Perceptions of Internet availability (% of respondents).
298 T.A. Carte et al.
and were dropped (dropped items are noted). The final measures exhibited reasonable validity (i.e.
all factor loadings exceeded 0.7) and reliability (all Cronbach’s alpha scores exceeded 0.8). Using
these validated measures, we conducted analysis to identify changes in CSE over time.
Table 3. Psychometric properties of measures.
Mean SDFactorloading Alpha
Involvement 0.827While studying in the PDP program, how often did you (1 ¼ rarely, 7 ¼ very often):Review the online forum report? 4.50 1.826 0.817E-mail your group members? 4.49 1.977 0.883E-mail your group’s facilitator? 4.32 1.855 0.793E-mail the PDPA program office? DroppedRead the PDPA newsletter? 4.71 1.765 0.715Contribute to the PDPA newsletter? DroppedFacilitator effectiveness 0.983
Please answer the following about your perceptions of your team’s facilitator (1 ¼ strongly agree, 7 ¼strongly disagree):
This group facilitator was a goodfacilitator
1.74 1.524 0.948
This group facilitator was veryeffective
1.94 1.600 0.956
This group facilitator led the group in away which motivated the groupmembers’
1.88 1.452 0.931
I liked working together with this groupfacilitator
1.71 1.558 0.965
How successful was your groupfacilitator?
Dropped
How successful will your groupfacilitator be in future tasks?
Dropped
Computer self-efficacy Time1/Time2 Time1/Time2 Time1 0.886/0.994
For the following questions please circle the answer that most closely reflects your attitude about usingtechnology to support your learning experience in this program (1 ¼ strongly agree, 7 ¼ stronglydisagree)
I am able to (at the end of the program Iwas able to) figure out how to use theInternet and CD for this programwithout spending much effort
2.4/1.98 1.39/1.363 0.774
I am able to (at the end of the program Iwas able to) figure out how to use theInternet and CD for this programwithout help from others
1.98/1.78 1.364/1.327 0.825
Table 4. t-Test results.
Paired samples statistics
Mean SD t-Value Sig. (one-tailed)
CSE1 11.67188 2.588465 21.1868 0.119881CSE2 12.23438 2.617051
Information Technology for Development 299
6.3.2 Analysis
Matched-sample t-test analysis revealed no differences between the CSE perceptions at the
beginning and end of the program (Table 4).
However, previous work on CSE suggests that gender plays an important role in our perceptions
(Harrison, Rainer Jr., & Hochwarter, 1997). Given such previous findings, we next conducted a
repeated-measures ANOVA, using CSE in time 1 and time 2 as a within-subjects factor, gender as
the between-subjects factor, and involvement and facilitator performance as covariates. The results
reveal a significant time X gender interaction (F1, 29.063 ¼ 4.331,2 p ¼ 0.042). Further, between-
subject results were significant for facilitator effectiveness (F1, 59 ¼ 4.129, p ¼ 0.047) and involve-
ment (F1, 59 ¼ 6.428, p ¼ 0.014). These results (depicted graphically in Figure 6) suggest that
experience (or time) mattered for the women in our study; their perceptions of CSE increased over
time as they experienced the technology. Further, time invariant effects were found for facilitator
performance and student involvement. Participant perceptions of CSE were higher when they
were more involved and when they had positive perceptions of their facilitator’s effectiveness.
7. Discussion
It has been argued that the Internet’s effect on digital inequity will depend on the social organ-
ization of its use – in terms of government programs, industry structure and pricing policies, and
approaches to the provision and organization of content (DiMaggio et al., 2004). In this paper,
we follow participants through a distance education or blended learning program resulting from
a government/university partnership – a new and potentially interesting component of the social
organization of Internet use in Sri Lanka. While the efforts of this program were not focused on
improving digital equity, we believe that hybrid learning environments supported by the Internet
offer a potential to level the digital playing field by combining learning a particular topic (public
administration in our case) with learning technology by using the Internet – i.e. “learning by
doing” as indicated in our title. Our participants developed IT awareness and improved IT
skills; an often cited critical driver of digital equity (Hsieh et al., 2008). Our findings might
be best understood in terms of inputs, processes, and outputs. We discuss them as such and
provide a summarizing model (Figure 7).
Figure 6. Computer self-efficacy.
300 T.A. Carte et al.
7.1 Inputs: student demographics and instruction methods
Early findings from our study identify individual traits that may lead to improved program out-
comes. According to Storey (1995), the key beliefs and assumptions in a human resource man-
agement model are that it is the human resource that gives competitive edge, the aim is not mere
compliance with rules, but to build employee commitment, and therefore employees should be
very carefully selected and developed. The success of our program certainly had some depen-
dence on who was selected to participate. Given our focus on reducing digital inequity, we
would not advocate selecting out students who may struggle a bit more with the learning
context, but we certainly recommend greater awareness of who might find such a program
more difficult. Our initial findings suggest older students struggled more in the beginning of
the program than younger ones. As such, others who are interested in developing a program
such as the one studied here may want to make arrangements for targeted early training in tech-
nology for older members of a cohort.
Further, we found individuals in our program who were higher on openness to experience
were less successful early on perhaps due to greater technology exploration (Devaraj et al.,
2008). A deeper investigation into our relationship between openness to experience and
program performance revealed a more U-shaped relationship (i.e. lower openness to experience
led to poorer performance and high openness to experience led to poorer performance, but indi-
viduals reporting openness to experiences levels around 3:5 on a five-point scale were the
highest performing). Such findings suggest the capture of personality data from individuals
applying for hybrid learning programs may be beneficial in helping to tailor the learning experi-
ence. For example, previous meta-analytic results demonstrated that openness is consistently
associated with training proficiency and engaging in learning experiences (Barrick & Mount,
1991), suggesting that the open individuals in our study may be fully engaged in the program,
but potentially saw technology as the more interesting learning experience. As such, highly
open individuals may be useful sources of knowledge transfer about the technology to their
less open colleagues. While modestly open individuals (i.e. scores around 3.5) may serve as
Figure 7. Resulting research model.
Information Technology for Development 301
brokers in a group – recognizing the usefulness of technology, but maintaining focus on
assigned tasks. Armed with such knowledge, program administrators may be able to create
small groups within a program that include a sort of requisite variety in openness.
7.2 The process: student involvement, facilitator effectiveness, and time
As with foreign-language instruction, we argued that technology skills might be improved not
via the direct technology training process, but rather by using a CBI process (i.e. using technol-
ogy to teach something else). Significant in our findings were the relationships between partici-
pant involvement, facilitator effectiveness and CSE improvements. Participants who were more
involved and who perceived their facilitators to be effective showed greater improvements in
CSE over the course of the program. These findings suggest the success of any efforts to
develop ICT competencies, using CBI would need to develop effective practices among facili-
tators which likely in turn would promote involvement. The well-used Hersey and Blanchard
(1988) Situational Leadership Model could be used for developing facilitators. The leadership
style of the facilitator would be imperative in order to give a high tech/ high touch interface,
incorporating coaching, supporting, mentoring and counseling in order to keep the participants’
attention and loyalty to connect with the hybrid-learning program.
Further, we would argue three essential strategies used by a facilitator in a traditional learn-
ing program that needs to be replicated in an on-line context: kinesics, paralanguage and seman-
tics. The scope for kinesics which refers to the use of body language in the on-line program in
this study included the twice monthly face-to-face session with the facilitator, and the DVD
course material. The face-to-face sessions could be used to build intimacy between the partici-
pants and the facilitator and more chat sessions and on-line forums could be used to further
develop relationships between face-to-face meetings. The language used in the program was
English. This had a dual purpose: for learning the language, as well as introducing business
semantics, the precise choice of words to be used in a situation. However, considering the neces-
sity to build a rapport with participants, paralanguage such as the introduction of essential
English words through interspersed Sinhala or Tamil dialect could be a conscious effort
toward complete English communication.
7.3 Outputs: IT skills and awareness
Finally, we argued that by using technology, the participant’s CSE – beliefs about one’s capa-
bilities to use technology – would be positively impacted over the course of the program. Our
participants were taught key management concepts, and that learning was delivered via the Inter-
net, CDs, and classroom instruction, and their CSE perceptions improved over the course of the
program – for women significantly so. Positively impacting CSE is important because improved
CSE can result in more positive future decisions to use technology (Compeau & Higgins, 1995).
Men typically demonstrate higher CSE perceptions than women (Harrison et al., 1997), and
this was true in our study as well. Initial CSE perceptions were higher among men than women;
however, at the conclusion of our program CSE perceptions among women were higher than
among men. One possible explanation for this finding is women are more responsive to the infor-
mation and feedback received from others and view such situations as potential opportunities to
learn more about their abilities (Roberts, 1991). Men, on the contrary, tend to adopt a competi-
tive attitude and thus, a self-confident (and potentially, overconfident) approach (see Lundeberg,
Fox, & Puncochar, 1994). These patterns of behavior impact the perceptions men and women
have about technology (Venkatesh, Morris, & Ackerman, 2000). As such, it is possible that
the women in our program responded more positively to the program administrators’ and
302 T.A. Carte et al.
facilitators’ positive endorsement of the use of technology in the program while the men did not.
This has implications for other programs; how can positive perceptions be built among both men
and women. For both, current experience with technology is a significant predictor of future
usage (Venkatesh et al., 2000); as such, providing early positive interactions with technology
may be helpful.
8. Conclusions
We set out to engage in an action research effort following the 18-month progress of students in a
postgraduate diploma program. Our thesis was IT skills and awareness may be improved not via
the direct instruction in technology but instead via a “learning by doing” approach. Such an
approach is supported by research on CBI (albeit this research focuses on foreign language
instruction). Our results are consistent with the educational rationale viewpoint among ICT
researchers – ICT instruction that takes the form of content-related ICT use can have the sec-
ondary benefit of ICT literacy. Further, we provide insight into how the infusion of technology
with the learning task may benefit students in such programs – especially women.
As governments worldwide increasingly implement e-government services, concerns about
the potential impacts of the digital divide continue to grow. The digital divide refers to the dis-
tinction between the information haves and have-nots; the gap between the computer literate and
the computer illiterate. More specifically, it can be argued that two major divides exist: an access
divide and a skills divide. The focus of our study was the latter of these. Our results suggest
taking a CBI approach to ICT education may be beneficial by improving CSE beliefs and
encouraging greater IT exploration and use among citizens. Further, we found significant
concerns among the participants of our study about ICT access. The latest Computer Literacy
Survey 2009, by the Department of Census and Statistics of Sri Lanka, shows that access to
computers is still enjoyed predominantly by urban populations and the increase in computer
ownership has also been painfully slow. Even among the privileged urban households, only a
quarter (26.3%) owned a desktop or laptop in 2009 – among rural populations, only 9.8%
owned either a desktop or a laptop. Conditions are worst in the plantation sector with only
3.3% owning a laptop or desktop in 2009 (Samaraweera, 2010). Given these conditions, we
believe our findings have some general applicability, but they are likely most directly translated
into use in countries with similar levels of economic development and computer access issues.
Further, generalizations from our findings should consider the interaction of the culture of
the host country and delivery of hybrid learning programs. Hofstede and Hofstede (2005)
described culture as the collective programming of the mind which distinguishes the
members of one group or category of people from another. While the educational profile of
the participants in the program studied is indeed impressive, all of them having bachelor’s
degrees, some with merit and some students having masters’ degrees as well, one would say
that this alone would bode well for the success of the program. However, the growth of the
high literacy in Sri Lanka (UN Common Database (UNESCO) rates it at 97% in 2004 for
youth between 15 and 24) is mainly due to the policies of successive governments being directed
towards welfare initiatives such as free education, free medical services, and in some periods
free food as well. This may account for a culture of dependency among a population thus edu-
cated. The assumption that the teacher leads in an educational process and the belief that help is
always at hand to prevent one failing is prevalent in such cultures. Such beliefs and assumptions
may work at cross-purposes when one needs to take a moderate initiative while learning in an
on-line program, particularly in relation to planning one’s own time for learning and walking
into an Internet cafe to access the program. There could be short-term as well as long-term
strategy in moving out of this culture of dependency. Short-term measures would include the
Information Technology for Development 303
selection of leaders of groups who are more achievement-oriented and would influence the group
to move from dependence to independence and then to interdependence. The long-term strategy
would involve socialization through agents such as home, school and workplace directed
towards a new work ethic-oriented towards learning in a hybrid environment.
Notes
1. Ethnicity, while potentially an important antecedent, was excluded from our analysis because oursample lacked variance on this measure.
2. The Huynh–Feldt correction was applied because the sphericity assumption was not met.
Notes on contributors
Traci A. Carte is an Associate Professor of MIS in the Michael F. Price College of Business at the Univer-sity of Oklahoma. She received her Ph.D. in MIS from the University of Georgia. Currently, her researchinterests include IT support for diverse teams, politics and IT, and research methods. Her research has beenpublished in such journals as MIS Quarterly, Information Systems Research, Group Decision & Nego-tiation, Decision Support Systems, and Journal of the AIS. She previously served on the editorial boardof MIS Quarterly and currently serves on the editorial board at the Journal of the AIS. In 2008 sheserved as a senior Fulbright Fellow in Sri Lanka.
Dr. Ajantha Dharmasiri is a Senior Faculty attached to the Postgraduate Institute of Management (PIM),University of Sri Jayewardenepura. He is also an adjunct professor in International HRM at the PriceCollege of Business, University of Oklahoma, USA. He has over two decades of private and public sectorworking experience, including work for multinationals. He has engaged in consultancies in more than tencountries. He is a Commonwealth AMDISA Doctoral Fellow and a Fulbright Postdoctoral Fellow. He holdsa Ph.D. and an MBA from the PIM and a B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Moratuwa.
Dr. Travis Perera is Senior Consultant at the Postgraduate Institute of Management, and specializes inEntrepreneurship, Organizational Behavior, and Operations Management. A Designs Engineer by pro-fession, he has worked as Engineer, Project Manager, Business Development Manager and GeneralManager in industry. He earned a Doctorate in Business Administration specializing in Organizational Be-havior and an MBA specializing in Entrepreneurship. He consults in management development programslocally and internationally, particularly in Africa, Trinidad and Tobago, and the Maldives.
References
Abeysekera, N. (2008). The study of how the introduction of online learning to traditional distance learningsystem impact on students-special reference to Open University of Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka: OpenUniversity of Sri Lanka.
Avgerou, C., Navarra, D., Miller, J., Sahay, S., & Volkow, N. (2003). WITFOR commission 1: Preparingfor ICT (WITFOR 2003 White Book). Laxenburg, Austria: IFIP Press.
Azjen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bada, A.O., & Madon, S. (2006). Enhancing human resource development through information and com-munication technology. Information Technology for Development, 12(3), 179–184. doi:10.1002/itdj.20040
Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
Belanger, F., & Van Slyke, C. (2000). From employee shirking to organizational learning: The role ofapplication play. Information Technology Learning and Performance Journal, 18(1), 61–70.
Bhatnagar, S.C. (2000). Social implications of ICT in DCs: Lessons from Asian success stories. EJISDC, 1,1–9.
Compeau, D.R., & Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initialtest. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211. doi:10.2307/249688
Crandall, J.A. (1993). Content-centered learning in the United States. Annual Review of AppliedLinguistics, 13, 111–126.
304 T.A. Carte et al.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of informationtechnology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. doi:10.2307/249008
Devaraj, S., Easley, R.F., & Crant, J.M. (2008). Research note – how does personality matter? Relating thefive-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Information Systems Research, 19(1), 93–105.doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0153
Dimaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use:Literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Socialinequality (pp. 355–400). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Eastin, M.S., & Larose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal ofComputer-Mediated Communication, 6(1.) Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x
Garfield, M.J., & Watson, R.T. (1997). Differences in national information infrastructures: The reflection ofnational cultures. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 6(4), 313–337. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(98)00012-2
Geisner, S., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). ’License to fail’: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality,and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and HumanDecision Processes, 105, 14–35. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.002
Harrison, A., Rainer, R.K., Jr., & Hochwarter, W. (1997). Gender differences in computing activity.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12(4), 849–868.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K.H. (1988). Management and organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G.J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY:NYM McGraw-Hill.
Hsieh, J.J., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008). Understanding digital inequity: Comparing continued use behavioralmodels of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 97–126.
Krashen, S.D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Lee, Y., Lee, Z., & Kim, Y. (2007). Understanding personal website usage in organizations. Journal
of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 75–99. doi: 10.1080/10919390701291067
Lundeberg, M.A., Fox, P.W., & Puncochar, J. (1994). Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences andsimilarities in confidence judgments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 114–121. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.114
Musa, P.F. (2006). Making a case for modifying the technology acceptance model to account for limitedaccessibility in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 12(3), 213–224.doi:10.1002/itdj.20043
OECD/CERI (Organizations for Economic Cooperation Development) (2001). Learning to change: ICT inschools. Paris: OECD.
Prensky, M. (2004). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations in self assessments in achievement settings.
Psychological Bulletin, 109, 297–308. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.297Samaraweera, D. (2010). Sri Lanka’s digital divide yawning open. Retrieved from http://dilsh.wordpress.
com/2010/01/09/sri-lankas-digital-divide-yawning-open/Storey, J. (Ed.). (1995). Human resource management – a critical text. London: Routledge.Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2007). Curricula and the use of ICT in education: Two worlds apart?
British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 962–976. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00680.xTRCSL (Telecommunications Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka) (2009). Retrieved from http://www.
trc.gov.lk/information/statistics.htmlVan Braak, J. (2001). Factors influencing the use of computers mediated communication by teachers in
secondary education. Computers and Education, 36, 41–57. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00051-8Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The
Information Society, 19(4), 315–326. doi:10.1080/01972240309487Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions.
Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.xVenkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., & Ackerman, P.L. (2000). A longitudinal field investigation of gender differ-
ences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organizational Behavior andHuman Decision Processes, 83(1), 33–60. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2896
Information Technology for Development 305
Copyright of Information Technology for Development is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content
may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express
written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.