BARABHAS 1: DATA STRUCTURE REPORT: A Bronze Age Settlement at Barabhas Machair, Isle of Lewis
-
Upload
historicenvironment -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
0
Transcript of BARABHAS 1: DATA STRUCTURE REPORT: A Bronze Age Settlement at Barabhas Machair, Isle of Lewis
BARABHAS 1: DATA STRUCTURE REPORT
A Bronze Age settlement at Barvas (Barabhas) Machair, Isle of Lewis
Trevor Cowie and Mary MacLeod Rivett 2010
With contributions by
Rosemary Cowie
Camilla Dixon
Mary Harman
CONTENTS
Abstract
1. Introduction to site 1
1.1 Background
1.2 Location and topography
1.3 Circumstances and date of work
2. Aims & Methodology
3. Field work results
3.1 Preliminary field work results (surface collection and augering)
3.2 Excavation results
4. Discussion
5. Bibliography
Appendices:
A Context list
B Matrices
C Sample list
D Drawing list
E Photo list
F Finds list and Catalogues
General list
Bone & antler
Pottery
Stone and pumice
G Existing specialist reports
Pottery
Animal bone
Fish Remains
Plant Remains – Camilla Dickson
H Coastal Survey Records
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Towards the north edge of the lower machair plain at Barabhas (formerly Barvas) in the Isle
of Lewis, survey (Cowie & Lane forthcoming) in 1978 revealed a small knoll at an elevation
of approximately 20m OD, badly truncated by erosion accentuated by rabbit disturbance.
When inspected in 1978, eroding out from the flanks of the knoll were fragments of pottery,
bone, pumice, worked stone and quartz, ash deposits, and apparently structural stonework,
combining to suggest the partial survival of some in situ domestic structure (in all
probability the truncated fragment of a larger domestic site, judging by the litter of
redeposited shell, bone etc. on the surrounding deflation surfaces). The pottery, coarse
undecorated ware, appeared on the basis of fabric identification to be `later Bronze Age'.
Earlier prehistoric (ie pre-Iron Age) domestic sites are at a premium in the Hebrides and the
site was therefore given a high priority for excavation despite its fragmentary state.
1.2 Location and Topography
The site was located at c. NB 351 316, at a height of c. 20m OD, towards the northern edge
of the lower machair plain, on the lower slopes of a sand escarpment running NNW-SSE
across the dune system. In some areas this escarpment has been quarried by small scale sand
extraction, in others, eroded.
The site was one of a series of small truncated settlement mounds, formed by occupation
and reoccupation over time in the same location, trapping moving sand. Before excavation,
the knoll was flat-surfaced, with eroding sides and patch grass cover.
1.3 Circumstances and date of work
Excavation on the site was carried out in July 1979. The weather was intermittently
sufficiently bad to stop work, and even dry days were plagued by wind strong enough to
cause significant sand movement and make working conditions difficult. The site was badly
infested with rabbits, and excavation opened a number of ‘live’ burrows, in addition to the
stratigraphic and structural complications caused by abandoned burrows, discussed below in
3.2.
2. AIMS & METHODOLOGY
The initial aims were to:
locate in situ intact deposits, if any, and surviving structural fragmnets
carry out a surface collection of finds in the surrounding area
totally excavate any surviving portions of the site
excavate small test trenches in any other likely locations.
The primary surface collection was undertaken over a grid of 5m squares. It was felt that
further accuracy would be spurious in view of the vertical and horizontal displacement of
the material (where further accuracy was needed, reference could be made to the relevant
quadrant). Collections included identifiable bone, worked stone and quartz, worked bone,
pottery and pumice.
A working baulk was left across the site, unrelated to the grid, in order to facilitate
access, to provide a windbreak, and to provide a cross-section through the intact deposits.
Context records, notes and sketches were kept in a site notebook. Single context recording
sheets were also completed. Multi-context plans were drawn at 1:20, and trench and
temporary sections at 1:10. It should be noted that some stratigraphic information was
recorded either only in the notebook, or on the context sheets, and that descriptions for some
contexts are missing. These issues will be further discussed below (section 3.2 – excavation
results).
A variety of sampling strategies were used. The bulk of the midden deposit was dry or wet-
sieved in toto at least through a 10 mm mesh, and much of it through a 2.5 mm mesh.
Where possible, a bucket from each context was reserved for wet sieving. Where the soil
was too wet for effective dry sieving, it was either dried on sheets, or roughly dry sieved,
then the residue wet sieved.
3. FIELD WORK RESULTS
3.1 Preliminary field work results
Work on Barvas 1 commenced with the establishment of a grid 5m intervals
approximately E-W and N-S. The grid alignment was largely determined by the local
topography, and formed the basis for the surface collection of finds. For the detailed
results of this work, please see the finds list spreadsheet. Collections were made of
identifiable bone, worked stone and quartz, worked bone, pottery and pumice. Flint and
chert were found amongst the worked stone.
3.2 Excavation results
The excavation was made particularly complex and difficult by the degree to which the site
had been damaged by both erosion and rabbit infestation. The excavator concluded that the
assemblages should not be treated as stratified, but post-excavation analysis has shown that
stratigraphic control over the upper part of the site was, in fact, good, and the damage was
largely confined to the lower areas, at the interface between underlying wind-blown sand
and the more compact archaeological deposits. Context descriptions are missing for
contexts 052, 054-060, 072-080, 096, 135, 139, 140, & 143-150, and much of the
information used to construct the stratigraphic sequence has been derived from the site
notebooks. The following text should be read in the light of these issues.
The removal of the overburden of turf (001), and loose, deflated sand (002) revealed the
truncated surfaces of a large spread of layers, of brown or black, humus-rich sand, visible
over the surface of the knoll. Uppermost of these were 014 & 029, both brown sandy
contexts. 029 overlay a black, humic soil 011 which, with 014, overlay a light-brown, wind-
blown sand 016. Potentially contemporary with this group of contexts was 015, a red, sandy
peat ash, which may, however, prove to be contemporary with the underlying group 019 &c,
see below.
016 overlay a small deposit 019 of mottled red, black and brown sand, and a similar layer
034. 031, a black deposit which was probably the same as black and red 037, underlay 019
and 015, and a further black deposit, 035 overlay an ashy pinkish layer 036. 031/7 were
over black sand 032, which contained pot and shell, and was over a further black deposit
040. Both 036 and 040 overlay a mottled sand with many pottery fragments, 033.
A group of post-holes, 048, 047, 046 & 038 were all cut into the black and red 031/7, and
sealed by 002.
033 overlay a very clean layer of wind-blown sand 039, which is equal to 004 and 050, and
which formed a significant stratigraphic break across a large area of the site. It was also
overlain by the following sequences of contexts.
Under 002, 003, a black layer containing midden material covered 010, a reddish, perhaps
ashy sand, itself over a thin brown sandy layer, 017. 017, which only occurred in a small
triangular area at the northern edge of the site, was over 018, a brown and black humus-rich
sand layer, which covered a thin black lens, 020. This overlay 039/004/050.
Also revealed by the removal of 002 was 009, a reddish sand which overlay 007, a black,
humic layer filling a dug feature 030. This feature was also partly sealed by blackish brown
sandy layer 023, which might have been the same as 007, and which lay under brown sand
008. 023 also overlay a black deposit, 027 and under it, 028, a black lens. 030 was cut into
layer 050/039/004, and it is presumed that 028 also overlay these deposits of sand.
The wind-blown sand deposits (050/039/004) sealed a brownish pink sand with large
numbers of shells, 044, which continued in the northern part of the site as 064. Over this,
and under 002 were two contexts, 041, a mottled sand under 042, a pinkish red soil. These
could either be contemporary with 044/064 or contemporary with the later group of ashy
contexts 034 &c. Also sealed by 050/039/004 was 005, a soft brown sand containing
midden material.
044/064 overlay 063, a black, humic sand containing lots of shells, which itself overlay 045,
a pink peat ash, also with lots of shells, very similar to 068, which was also under 044/064.
Above this group of deposits, and under 002 was a sequence the uppermost layer of which,
021, was a brown, windblown sand which can probably be grouped with 002. 021 covered
022 and 024, both black, very laminated, humus-rich sands. These were over 025, which
may have been the same as 043, and was a mottled light brown sand similar to, and possibly
contemporary with 033. Under 025 was a thin, iron-stained reddish orange layer which
overlay 063.
Under 045 was a brown sandy layer with many shells, 061, which may have formed part of
the overlying complex of shelly layers (063, 068, 045). The records are unclear as to
whether 061 overlay 069, which was an extensive brown sandy layer, possibly a deliberately
laid floor, which covered the interior of an oval structure defined by wall 066 (see
discussion section 4 below). The shelly deposits were identified during excavation as two
dumps of material over 069.
088, a layer of mottled black-brown sand, lay under 069, and would appear to have been
contemporary with 049, a small patch of shell or peat ash, and underlying 049, 062, a
laminated layer of black lenses and sand. All three layers overlay 067, which was a
continuation of 055 (for which no description survives) and 006. 067/055/006 was a
fragmentary, black-brown surface, with some iron staining, which appeared to spread over
the whole interior of the oval structure defined by 066.
Outside the oval building, and under 002, a black-brown iron-stained surface 012 was
removed to reveal 094 and 095, ashy lenses of pinkish brown sand containing shells.
Within the building, 067/055/006 overlay 084, a brownish, sandy layer with lumps of black
soil, 085 (black lense) and 086, a light brown sandy layer. These overlay 092, a compact,
black, humus-rich layer, which covered most of the base of the building, but did not touch
the wall 066, from which it was separated by a band of clean sand. Also over 092 was 089,
a patch of pinkish ash, which also lay over 091, a brown sand layer which was present in an
area not covered by 092. 092 overlay a further pink ashy layer, 100, containing some shell
and bone, which lay over clean sand, 093. These deposits appear to derive from the earliest
use of the structure.
A further group of deposits, 109 (yellow peat ash), over 107 (pink peat ash), and 108 (brown
sand) are probably also in the same stratigraphic position, and derive from the earliest use of
the building.
A variety of small, possibly structural features occurred under 067/055/006. A dark sandy
patch, probably a post-hole, abutted a paved stone feature 056. A similar, dark sandy patch,
110, was truncated by rabbit damage but also likely to be a post-hole. 122, a spread of dark
soil and stones adjacent to 056, may well have been a part of 055, or a collapsed part of the
paved stone feature 056, but was extensively rabbit damaged, and its interpretation was
unclear. 141, a loosely constructed line of stones probably over 092, may have been the
footings of an internal partition. 111 & 112 were a further post-hole.
The structure itself was defined by 066, which was a laminated band of apparent degraded
turf, consisting of horizontal bands of humic material separated by sand layers, around a
solid central core of further humic soil. This was interpreted as the degraded remains of a
turf wall. It rested on sterile sand and from the exterior face ran horizontal darker surfaces,
interleaved by clean sand, which probably represented the remains of buried old ground
surfaces, or eroded deposits of midden. 066 was constructed directly onto clean, wind-
blown sand 093. Three stones set upright against the inner face of the wall 066 may have
been edging stones for the wall, but their relationship to the wall and to the interior deposits
of the structure was unclear, as there was an area of clean sand running along the inside edge
of them. This may have resulted from their being dug into place from a higher layer than
the original construction, but unfortunately, could easily also be the result of rabbit damage
to the deposits.
The shape of the structure described by 066 was not clear. 066 ended abruptly at its
northern end, probably as a result of ancient erosion damage, and it could be interpreted as
either a straight wall or, more probably, as part of an oval, curving at the southern end.
Possibly contemporary with the construction of 066, though the relationship is not recorded
clearly and is likely to have been destroyed by rabbit burrowing, was context 142, a stretch
of similar deposit, 1.8m long, located c. 2m southeast of the main structure. The outer edge
of this layered black and brick red humic sand was bounded by four stones, and marks to the
south of the southernmost of these may have indicated the original position of a further two
stones. The turf core of 142 was laid over clean wind-blown sand (093), but the
northernmost of the edging stones lay over a deposit of mottled sand containing large
numbers of shells (151). The relationship of this layer to 066 is not clear from the site
notebooks, but if it derives from the use of the main building, then the ancillary structure
defined by 142 is clearly secondary. However, it may have its origins in an earlier use of the
site; this question remains unresolved.
Within, and later than 142, was a sequence of deposits derived from the use of this ancillary
structure. 150 overlay 142, and is described as a ‘red soil’. Over it lay what was probably
originally a group of deposits, 090, layers of black and red, humus-rich lenses, which were
very disturbed by rabbit burrowing. It was overlain by 091, a compact brownish red layer
with some iron staining, which was under 083, a wind-blown sand. Over this was a patchy,
red-orange to brown sand layer, 065, which itself lay under 002.
002 also covered a further sand layer, 104, which overlay a firm light brown sand which
seems to have been the remains of an old ground surface, above sterile wind-blown sand
093.
The remaining contexts were either rabbit burrows (097-9, 101-3, 117, 121, 124-5, 127-31,
133-7), or deposits for which there has not been sufficient information to determine their
stratigraphic placement.
4. DISCUSSION
Excavation, in July 1979, revealed that, as suspected, the site was in poor condition, and the
results are therefore inconclusive.
The remains of a structure of indeterminate original size and form enclosed the remains of a
possibly paved and peat-ash covered floor (c 5 by 4 metres maximum surviving area) from
which were recovered a scatter of sherds, bone, shell and antler and worked stone. What
evidence there is suggests that the walling consisted of a turf-and-sand core revetted by
stone; there may have been internal post-holes and a partition wall but the extent of the
rabbit disturbance frustrated the recovery of any meaningful picture of the internal
furnishings. The structure appears to have been affected by erosion in antiquity prior to a
second phase of occupation, though the cultural material remained unchanged.
Truncation by wind erosion abetted by rabbit disturbance had thereafter reduced the site to
its present condition: as noted above a dense scatter of redeposited shell, bone and other
debris in the surrounding area suggested that the structure was the surviving fragment of a
once more extensive site.
The dating of the site is still dependent on the tentative attribution of the pottery to the `Later
Bronze Age' (probably around late 2nd/early 1st millennium BC), but radiocarbon dates will
be obtained from antler recovered from the floor deposits. Despite its fragmentary condition
therefore, the site will be of considerable importance if the coarse pottery assemblage can be
assigned to a dateable horizon, since dating of many potentially interesting erosion sites is
wholly dependent on the identification of what are at present largely undiagnostic scatters of
sherds.
5. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Amoroso, E. C. & Jewell, P. 1963. `The exploitation of the milk-ejection reflex by
primitive peoples' in (eds) A. E. Mourant & F. Zeuner, Man & Cattle Royal Anthrop. Inst.
of Great Britain and Ireland. 126-137
Armit, I. (ed.) (1990) Beyond the Brochs, Edinburgh
(1992 a) Later Iron Age Settlement in the Western Isles, University of
Edinburgh PhD. thesis
(1992 b) The Later Prehistory of the Outer Hebrides, BAR 221
Bogucki, P. I. 1984. `Ceramic sieves of the Linear Pottery culture and their economic
implications'. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 3 (1) 15-30.
Colley, S M (n.d) 'The Marine Resource Remains' in J W Hedges et al (forthcoming) 'Trial
Excavations on Pictish and Viking Settlements at Saevar Howe, Birsay, Orkney'
Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland
Colley, S M (n.d) Interim Report on Fish Remains from Tuquoy, Westray, Orkney, 1982
Excavations. Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton.
Cowie, T 1979 ‘276 Barvas Machair’, Discovery and Excavation in Scotland 1979, 47
Cowie & Lane forthcoming
Dahl, G. & Hjort, A. 1976. Having Herds. Stockholm.
Dickson, J. H. 1977. ‘The Botany of Brochs’ Scottish Archaeological Forum 9, pp. 62-65.
Edinburgh University Press.
Fenton, A (1978), The Northern Isles: Orkney and Shetland, John Donald, Edinburgh.
Grant, A. 1975. `Appendix B: the use of tooth wear as a guide to the age of domestic
animals: a brief explanation'. In Cunliffe, B. Excavations at Portchester Castle: Volume I,
Roman 437-450.
Helbaek, H. 1954. ‘Prehistoric Food Plants and Weeds in Denmark’ Danm. Geol. Undevs.
11 R 80, 250-261.
Helbaek, H. 1964. ‘The Isca grain: A Roman plant introduction in Britain’ New Phytol.,
63, 158.
Jessen, K. & Helbaek, H. 1944 ‘Cereals in Great Britain and Ireland in Prehistoric and Early
Historic Times’ Kong. Danske. Videnskab. Selskab. 3, 1-68.
Lane A., 1983 Dark Age and Viking Age Pottery in the Hebrides, University of London
PhD thesis
Legge, A. J. 1981. `The Agricultural Economy' in R. J. Mercer (ed) Grimes Graves,
Norfolk: Excavations, 1971-2 Vol. 1. London: Department of the Environment
Archaeological Report 11, 79-103.
McCormick, F. 1983. `Dairying and beef production in early Christian Ireland: the faunal
evidence' in T. Reeves-Smyth & F. Hamond (eds.), Landscape Archaeology in Ireland
Oxford: British Archaeological Reports Brit. Ser. 116. 253-267.
Mellars, P A and Wilkinson, M R (1980), 'Fish Otoliths as Indicators of Seasonality in
Prehistoric Shell Middens: the Evidence from Oronsay (Inner Hebrides)', Proceedings of the
Prehistoric Society 46, 19-44.
Morales, A and Rosenlund, K (1979) Fish Bone Measurements. An Attempt to Standardize
the Measuring of Fish Bones from Archaeological Sites, Zoologisk Museum, Kobenhavn.
Parker-Pearson, M., P. Marshall, J. Mulville & H. Smith, 2010 Cladh Hallan
http://www.shef.ac.uk/archaeology/research/cladh-hallan/cladh-hallan03.html
Payne, S (1975), 'Partial Recovery and Sampling Bias', in A T Clason (ed)
Archaeozoological Studies, North Holland Publishing Company, Oxford, 7-17.
Payne, S. 1984. `The use of early 19th Century data in ageing cattle mandibles from
archaeological sites, and the relationship between the eruption of M3 and P4'. Circaea, 2,2.
77-82.
Ponting, M. & R., 1979 ‘274 Loch Mor Barvas’, Discovery and Excavation in Scotland
1979, 46-7
Serjeantson, D. unpublished. `The mammal, bird and fish remains from Udal North;
interim report'. In I. A. Crawford, Excavations at Udal North Cambridge University Press.
Sherrat, A. G. 1981. `Plough and pastoralism: aspects of the secondary products
revolution'. In I Hodder, G. Isaac & N. Hammond (eds.), Pattern of the Past: studies in
honour of David Clarke Cambridge University Press. 261-305.
Silver, I A, 1963 'The Ageing of Domestic Animals' in Brothwell, D R and Higgs, E S eds.
Science in Archaeology London 1963, 250-268.
Silver, I. A. 1969. `The Ageing of Domestic Animals' in D. R. Brothwell & E. S. Higgs
(eds.), Science in Archaeology 2nd edition. London: Thames & Hudson, 283-302.
Simonds, J. B. 1854. The Age of the Ox, Sheep & Pig London: W. S. Orr.
Wheeler, A 1978 Key to the Fishes of Northern Europe, Frederick Warne, London.
Wheeler, A and Jones, A 1976, 'Fish Remains', in A Rogerson (ed) 'Excavations on Fuller's
Hill, Great Yarmouth', East Anglian Archaeology Report No. 2, Norfolk Archaeological
Unit, 131-234.
Zeist, W. van., 1970 ‘Prehistoric and Early Historic Food Plants in the Netherlands’
Palaeohistoria XIV pp. 42-173.
APPENDIX A: CONTEXT LIST
Unless otherwise stated all contexts are in area 115/110.
Stratigraphic relationships in this list are stated as in the original context sheets. However,
the following matrix includes information derived from the site notebooks, to clarify areas
of ambiguity. The plans and sections have not been available for consultation during the
writing of this report.
Context
no.
Description Stratigraphic rel.
002 knoll and knoll slopes. Wind-blown sand under turf on
summit of knoll and top layer of unturfed slopes of
mound. Contains eroded midden material; colour from
white to brown; texture of sand. In quad 120/110 layer
contained thin lense c 5 cm thick, rich in shells
(winkles & limpets). This is the overlying clean sand.
Over everything
003 area 115/110 (for all features unless otherwise stated).
Black humic layer, containing midden material.
Possibly once turfed, contains small stones, patchy in
depth and distribution.
over 004, 010
under 002
004 Layer of wind-blown sand. over 005
under 002, 003
005 Soft brown sand containing midden material. Possibly
not continuous over 006, as iron staining visible.
Separated from 006 by a very thin lense of sand
over 006
under 004
006 Black-brown surface with some iron-staining, sandy. under 005
007 Black, humic, circular depression, perhaps a former
eroding edge. Part of 030; poss. continuation of 003,
023
over 030, 004
under 009, 002.
008 Brown sand with midden material on S side of temp.
section REF NO (W side of main baulk).
under 002
009 Reddish sand. Towards stone `line' intermingling of
this layer and black humic soil occur.
over 007
onder 002
010 Reddish sand under black humic soil N side of temp.
section. This layer seen later in the section on the W of
the baulk, dipping sharply from S to N.
over 004
under 003
011 Area 115/115 & 115/110. Black humic soil. May
represent gradual erosion & weathering of the former
`turf' around the stone `line', rather than a single phase
of deposition. Continuation of 003 ?, 032, 022
over 015, 016
under 002
012 Area 120/115. Black-brown iron-stained surface. Sherd
removed.
position not yet
known.
013 Area 115/105. Brown midden material, lower slopes of position not yet
mound. Sherd removed. Probably 055. known
014 Small pocket of brown sand over black, humic layer &
wind-blown sand.
over 016
under 002
015 Red peat ash with some sand, fairly compact. Small
amt removed previously, but found to go under 011.
Further red humic material, although slightly more
sandy, found immediately S of stone line, under mixed
sand and under patches of black humic material. Red
material S of stones contains numerous shells -
possibly 045 here ?
over 011; under
011, 002;
contemporary with
019 ?
016 Light brown wind-blown sand.
over 019
under 011 & 014
017 Thin brown sand layer covering small triangular area in
N.
over 018 to N, and
004 to S
under 010
018 Black and brown humus and sand layer, covering
triangular area in N. Possible floor surface ?
over 004
under 017
019 Mottled brown, red and black surface, possibly
consisting of a thin layer of stained sand. Possibly little
over 1m² in extent.
over 031, 032;
under 016;
contemporary with
015?
020 Thin black humic lense to N of possible wall under 018
021 Brown wind-blown sand (local ?), immediately S of
wall.
over 022
under 002.
022 Black humic layer. Very mixed stratigraphy,
alternation of black and sand layers. Probably natural
infilling of underlying hollow
within 021
023 Blackish brown sandy layer, at max c 6 cm thick,
becoming thinner to the S. Contains numerous stone
fragments (ie crushed into a floor ?). Possibly
contemporary with 022. Soil sample taken for wet
sieving.
over 028 in N
against stone
feature, and 027;
under 008
024 Black humic mixed with large amount of sand.
Over 026, 025
under 022.
025 Mottled light brown sand. Possible continuation of
033? Possibly over more black humic deposit.
Over 026
under 024
026 Red-orange iron-stained sand, thin layer. Dips steeply
W from about 54 cm E from baulk. This slope does not
continue into the baulk, stops c 20cm E of baulk. Small
slippage from this layer against baulk.
Over 063, 045
under 024, 025
027 Blackish sandy layer under 023.Possible continuation
of 004 ?
under 023
028 Thin black lense under 027, 023
029 Brown humic over black humic against E end of over 011
stones. Antler in this. under 002
030 Feature dug through sand, filled with black soil with
small amount of red soil above. Cuts wind blown sand
004. Possibly same as 007 and 009.
over 004
031 Black layer. Possible continuation of 037
over 032, 036
under 019
032 Blackish sand, contains some pot and shell. Possibly
continuation of 011 or 022?
NB rough sketch for layer cards included.
over 033
under 019, 031
033 Mottled sand, many pot fragments. Apparently under
but also over the S edge of 036 - possible if 036
represents an ash lense
over 036
under 032.
034 Area 115/115. Same for following features unless
otherwise stated. Mottled brick-red and black layer,
excavated in Errol [?] trench only.
over 035;
under 019 or 002?
035 Area 115/115. Thin black layer, no finds. Present in N
end of trial section. Possibly a continuation of 034 but
without the brick red.
over 036;
under 034
036 Area 115/115. Flecked (orangish) pink & black specks
(overall pinkish appearance of layer, greasy texture).
Possibly ash deposits. Layer stops short for no apparent
reason.
over 033, but also
appears to have
mottled sand lying
over its edge
under 035, 033, 034
037 Area 115/115. Mixed blackish-red humic soil. Stones c
10 x 12 cm showing under this layer. Layer to E side of
trial trench only. Possibly continuation of 031?
over 032
038 Area 115/115. Possible post-hole. Not noted until
removal of 033, mottled sand. Fill at this stage of
brown soil mixed with sand, see drawing of E section
of trial trench. A 10 cm baulk was left & the E
remainder of 038 was removed. The E and W profiles
of 038 do not resemble a typical post-hole fill.
Apparently dug from 037 - 031 layer?
NB plan drawing present.
Over 037/031
039 Area 115/115. Wind-blown sand, very clean with the
exception of some transitory lenses of black material
(turf ?), and streaks of soft brown sand. Continuation of
004 in N of W baulk.
under 038, 033, 036
040 E of baulk, as are following unless otherwise stated.
This area is contained by a rough semi-circle of stones
(see plan), the fill of which is dark black. The black fill
was thin and lay over mottled sand 033, with some
blackish sand where the two layers met. After removal
of 033, a small cluster of 3 stones was noted, 2 of
which were upright and about 20 cm in height.
over 033.
(CONTEXT REF?)Apparently the packing for a post-
hole but there was very little evidence for this in the
section profile (see drawing).
NB plan and drawing included.
041 Mottled sand over black and clean sand surface.
?
042 Brownish pink/red soil. Contained a limpet shell filled
with pink peat ash, and incorporated a small pocket of
peat ash. Possibly contemporary with contemporary
with 045.
over 041, 062
under 002;
043 Area 120/112. Brown sand, contains numerous shells.
Possibly same as 025?
NB plan included.
044 Brownish-pink sand containing large number of shells.
Presumably lies under or abuts against 033 (which
contained numerous pot sherds but no shells); Possibly
a continuation of 064?
NB also several rough sketches included.
over 045, 063, and
possibly 039
045 Area 115/110 and 120/110. Deep pink peat-ash, very
dense in shells, especially limpets. Almost as many
shells as ash, possibly swept from a hearth?
[detritus discarded in 1996 - reddish colour
pronounced; also comminuted stone component -
gritty/gravelly size noticeable]
Over 069.
046 Area 115/115, as are following features unless
otherwise stated. Post-hole: L 18 cm; W 18 cm; D 8
cm.
NB section drawings included.
Dug into sand from
layer 031 or 032 or
higher layer.
047 Area 115/115 Post-hole.
Dug into wind-
blown sand
possibly from 031
or 037
048 Area 115/115Post-hole.
Dug into wind-
blown sand, and
possibly through
peat-ash from layer
031/037 or higher
layer.
049 Shell layer or second layer of peat ash. On plan small
20 x 20 cm area only
Over 062
Possibly under 061
050 Layer of laminated wind-blown sand and darker lenses
of either dark, grey black humic material or more
amorphous discolourated brown sand.
051 Post-hole, probable/definite. Fill of grey brown
speckled sand, with no distinctions. Homogeneous fill.
052 unused
053 053Sample of grey-brown sand from 053 (numbered as
sample 2, 115/110, dated 19/7/1979) - discarded 1996 -
charcoal stained, with some shell
054-060 unused
061 Brownish sand layer, very dense in shells. On S side of
temporary baulk under 045; possible continuation of
063.
over 062
under 045
062 The amalgamation of layered sand and black-humic
lenses above 066 and 067, (ie the turf wall core and
`upper floor level'). Depth reaches 20 cm in places,
contains some shells.
over 067
under 061, 011B.
063 Area 115/115. Mixed black humic and stained sand
containing numerous shells. Fills and forms part of
oval feature. Over 069 on its S edge, and an 067 - type
layer on its N half
Over 069
abuts 045
064 Area 115/115. Laminated sand in N corner of the `oval'
area (N of temp baulk). This laminated sand has a
concave edge in the W baulk, (later found to be caused
by rabbit disturbance). Possible continuation of 044
equals 044?
065 Red-orange to brown sand sitting on wind-blown sand
in patches, but on the whole transcribing part of a
wandering oval shaped band on the S side of the temp
baulk. Borders 062.
Sample of detritus discarded 1996 - gritty, brown sand
much vegetable material
over 083
under 002
066 Apparently the base of a turf core of a wall. Is in places
up to 15 cm thick, but more often is just c 5 cm thick.
In section the turf `walling' has an irregular appearance.
It consists of 3 to 4 approx horiz bands of humic
material separated by sand layers but which are all
connected to each other by a solid central or terminal
spine of humic material generally dipping downwards
from W to E. Thus the overall stratigraphic depth
which these bands of humic material occupy varies
between about 12 cm to 25 cm. Where sections were
cut through the turf walling a general trend was
noticed:- the wall rested on sterile sand, while on the
exterior face from the connecting spine there run
stained layers representing former land surfaces or
erosion layers. Each of these supposed erosion layers
are inter-separated by sterile sand. A particularly
distinctive layer associated with the lowermost humic
horizon is that of feature 106.
NB The above generalisations concerning the siting of
the turf walling on sterile sand and the association of
Over sterile sand.
its outer face with former land surfaces/ midden
erosion layers also holds true for the turf walling of the
ancillary structure, context 110 (although no ash
staining directly associated).
There is some evidence for the placing of edging
stones at least on the interior of the `wall' - the 3
upright stones still possibly in situ? (grid sq 119/113) -
yet in this case the stones had no relationship to the
interior `floor' layers although they might have been
assumed to have protected deposits. Instead their
interior face is bounded by sand (rabbiting?) or
possibly indicating their intrusion from a higher level.
Immediately S of these stones (119/ 113 and 119/112),
hollows in the sand which showed up clearly against
the black layer 092 suggest the former presence of
edging stones. No trace of stones in N half - instead a
bright red layer on interior (context 112).
Post-excavation appearance - present only on E side of
baulk (no trace at all on W side). Could be interpreted
either as straight wall or as an oval, (ie evidence for
curve at S end - see plan). Ends abruptly in N due to
ancient erosion.
Questions - 1) wall: no. of building phases 1, 2 or 3 ?
2) original height: low bank ? c 1 m ?
3) any superstructure ? (no trace of post holes.
4) purpose: enclosure ? boundary ?
5) if enclosure then: of living quarters, shelter, animal
pen etc.
6) life-span of wall ?
7) if not wall then what ?
067 A thin, fragmentary, black humic layer broken by
patches of sand. Seemed to fill interior of the oval ?
building, to the S of the temp baulk, and appeared to be
present in S half of area N of temp baulk.
Originally thought to have been continuation of 055 W
of baulk and planned as such. But on excavation only
that part of 067 that lay N of temp baulk was found
likely to have been the continuation of 055 (and of 092
N of temp baulk).
N of the temp baulk 067 lay over clean sand on its S
and E edges and over a (if 055) compact ashy (089)
lense for the remainder of its expanse. Some small
Over 084, 089, 085,
possibly over 086
under 062, 063,
069;
possible
continuation of
055, or 006, or
050?
Over 089
under 069
possible
continuation of
088?
stones began to be visible in SW of this area.
S of baulk - In 119/113, layer 067 reached a maximum
of 3 cm depth at temp baulk, where it consisted of solid
black humus. 067 covered a brown sandy layer,
numbered 084. Further S, 067 appeared to be replaced
by a layer consisting of a thin black lense over medium
brown sand (erroneously numbered 085). Yet in the E
baulk section little if any difference could be seen in
the sandy component of 085 and 084.
Second 067 entry - location 118/114 and 118/115.
Black stained layer, ie thin black streak over darkish
sand. Disappears in S end of 118/115.
Detritus of 067 discarded in 1996 - very dark
grey/black colour confirmed - also very noticeable
stony/gritty/gravelly component with crushed pot,
burnt material etc; further detritus sample almost
entirely composed of grit).
068 Area 115/110, 115/115. Pre-excavation - where the
sloping pink peat ash evened out to a level surface it
appeared to merge into a compact pinkish black layer
containing fewer shells. This was removed as 068.
Although in plan, 068 appeared to be the horizontal
continuation of 045, in the N face of the temp baulk
section no relation could be seen with 045. Layers 033
and 044 cover both 045 and 068. Only in the temp
baulk, 045 appears to have been a pit (although
rabbited at base), and is cut through 069. Is 068
spillage from pit 045 ? (although no direct link-up in
section.
Over 069
under 033
possibly under 044
possibly
contemporary with
045
069 Area 115/110, 115/115. A brown sandy layer covering
the sloping sides and floor of the `oval'.
Overlain by 2 apparent dumps of material on its
sloping sides (045 - pink peat ash with great shell
density, and 063 abutting against the N edge of 045
and consisting of black soil (turf ?), and black stained
sand containing large no. of shells - bucket samples of
045 and 063 taken) The level `base' of 069 is overlain
by a pinkish black layer 068, containing some shells
(068 is distinct from 045 and 063 but may represent
erosion from 045 and 063 - 068 bucket sample taken).
Underlying history uncertain - 069, over layers
representing disintegration of `turf wall' 066?
Detritus of 069 discarded in 1996 - brown with yellow
sand WBS grains present, rooted/vegetable matter
Over 067, 092, 088
under 045, 063, 068
possible
continuation of 062
present; grits from decomposed stone
070 not in context book
071 sample of dirty brown sand with some shell (discarded
1996)
072-080 Not in context book
081 Area 120/110. Cleaning of `old land surface' for
photograph. Brownish-reddish layer, with some iron
staining, fairly compact `surface'.
Over wind-blown
sand
under 083
082 Area 117/115. A small (c 50 cm NW/SE x 20 cm
NE/SW), patch of greasy pinkish-brown soil (ie ash-
stained), against the W baulk.
Over a small pocket
of wind-blown
sand, and black soil
and sand
083 Wind-blown sand.
Over 081
under 065
084 Area 119/113, 118/113. Brownish-sandy layer 4-5 cm
thick, and sloping W from group of 3 upright stones.
Incorporates some lumps of black soil. This layer is re-
interpreted in 119/112, therefore see 085 and 086, ie
084 in grid sq 119/113, S of the 2 stones, is equivalent
to the brown sandy lense of 085, overlying 086 in grid
sq 119/112.
Very gritty detritus discarded 1996
Over 092
under 067.
085 Area 119/112. Thin black lense overlying brown sandy
layer c 5 cm thick. This layer disappears in S half of
119/112.
Over 086
under 067
086 Area 119/112. Light-brown sandy layer. Contains pot-
sherds and pot fragments which penetrate the base of
085. This layer disappears in S half of 119/112.
Slight possibility that in S half 119/112 086 was
excavated as part of layer 067.
Brown gritty detritus discarded in 1996
Over 092
under 085.
087 Area 115/119. Post-hole, 15 x 15 cm (measured from
interior faces of stones), depth 38 cm (from top of
tallest stone). Uppermost layer - brown `humic'
containing shells overlying brown sand. Bottoms out
into black `humic' of 066, but also cuts through 066
slightly. 4 stones edge the hole, 2 almost vertical ( one
20 cm in height, the other 28 cm in height), plus 2
stones each 17 cm high, one of which was wafer thin.
Level from which post-hole cut unknown, presumably
not a feature of `turf wall' 066 ?
Over 066
088 Area118/115. Mottled brown-black sand.
Over 092
under 069;
possible
continuation of 067
089 Area 118/114. Small pinkish deposit, flecked with Over 091, 092
black (ash ?). Rather patchy, abuts against clean sand
in S and E, where it meets the sloping side of the `turf
wall'.
under 067.
090 Area 122/111. Brightly stained sand adjacent to red
soil 150 (decayed turf), plastered to inner face of
stones. Contains mixed black and red humic lenses.
NB it was not possible to refine the division of layers
in interior of structure 150, due to the large amount of
rabbit activity alongside and under the `wall'. For the
same reason, the attempt to obtain a section through
`wall' and interior layers was unsuccessful.
Possibly represents gradual erosion of 150?
Detritus discarded 1996 confirmed reddish colour with
bone, shell, stone grit content]
Over sterile sand,
093
under 081.
091 Area 118/114, 119/114. Mixed dirty brown sand layer,
very soft. Almost sterile
Over 093
under 089
092 E of main baulk. Compact black layer. Present mainly
in 118/115 (appears only in the NW corner of
118/114). No distinction could be made between 092
on the base of one oval feature and the black `humic'
material adhering to the sides of the feature, (N area
only). The black material on the sloping sides of the
feature overlay a red and red-black stained layer.
S of temp baulk, 092 did not come into contact with the
turf wall (or with the 3 edging stones). Between the
`wall' and 092 was a band of yellow sand, presumably
indicating the former presence of inner facing stones
(see plan).
Over 093
under 088, 069,
084, 086, 089.
093 Interior of `oval' structure. Golden yellow sterile sand.
Some features visible in this sand - the majority on
excavation proved to be rabbit burrows. See feature
numbers 097, 098, 099, 100, 101, 102, 103.
Over base of layers;
under 092.
094 Area 120/115. Pinkish brown sand containing shells.
Eroded deposits of 045?
Over 106, 066
under unnumbered
layers, see plan 3.
095 Area 120/115. Pink ashy layer in lenses, not extending
over more than 1m². Probably lenses of 094.
Over - see 094;
under - see 094;
within 094 ?
096 No record
097 Area 118/114. Amorphous feature. Between temp
baulk and main baulk a c. 40 cm² area of stained sand
visible, ringed by 6 smallish stones, with one longer
stone within the `feature' itself at right angles to its N
Over 093
under 091
within 093.
edge. Rabbit burrow also visible in interior
Nothing conclusively visible in S and W sections after
excavation. Most of `fill' appears to be sand from a
rabbit burrow. Base uncertain.
098 Area 118/114, 118/115. Amorphous feature of soft
brown sand, diam 10 cm², depth 4 cm.
Over 093
under 091
within 093
099 Area 118/114. Circular feature of light brown sand,
diam 10 cm², depth 13 cm. Fill is mottled throughout.
Possibly a non-existent feature as the surrounding sand
had been disturbed by rabbit burrowing.
100 Area 118/115. Deposit of pink, greasy ash, diam c 30
cm, depth 5-6 cm, on an E-W slope immediately below
stones on outer edge of 066. To left of the pink layer is
a large circular stone sitting on blackish sand. The
stone was removed and a continuous section was cut
through the pink ash and the black sand from N to S
The black sand formed a `pedestal' under the round
stone and seems to have truncated the peat ash. The
pink peat ash contained some shell and bone and would
appear to be a small dump of ash resting on a sandy
slope.
Over 093
under 092.
101 Area 117/115. Amorphous feature of light brown sand,
possibly caused by rabbit burrowing.
Over 093
under 092.
102 Area 117/ 115. Circular, black greasy feature, probably
represents a part of layer 092 which has subsided into a
rabbit burrow. This area of the site was extensively
disturbed by rabbits.
Over 093
under 092
103 Area 118/115. Possible post-hole, diam 8 cm, depth 12
cm. Black shadow protruding from the S side of a
narrow stone.
A box section was taken out. The stone on the N side
of the feature was situated in yellow sand. The blackish
sandy shadow on its S side may be a possible post-
hole, (excavated depth 12 cm). Lighter, mottled sand
on the S side of this blackish sand may be part of the
same feature.
Over 093
under 092
within 093
104 Area 119/116. Wind-blown deposit of soft yellow
sand.
Over 105
Possibly under 002
105 Area 119/ 116. Light brown, firmish sand.
Over 093 & sterile
sand
under 104.
106 Area 120/115, 120/116. Very thin, salmon pink ashy
layer, slopes away from outer edge of `turf wall 066'
Over eroded
midden deposits;
becoming increasingly fragmented to the E, until
finally disappearing.
under 095.
107 W of baulk. Pink peat ash.
108 W of baulk. Brown sand.
Under peat ash
(107?)
109 W of baulk [as are following features unless otherwise
stated]. Yellow peat ash, c 8 cm thick.
Cuts red peat ash.
110 Irregular patch of dark brown sand lying against
background of light coloured wind-blown sand, located
adjacent to S erosion edge on W of baulk; E edge
truncated by rabbit disturbance. Full size therefore
unclear but surviving dimensions 26 cm N-S, 32-33 cm
E-W.
Probably a post-hole, with dark brown sand
replacement staining and discoloured wind-blown sand
and staining representing back-filled post-hole.
Sample discarded in 1996 suggests reddish-brown grit
free sand with some shell (limpets, mussel) and some
pottery fragments. Could therefore be collapsed
material rather than feature fill??
Cuts wind-blown
basal sand;
Possibly under 055
111 Dark patch with circular reddish brown/brown stain
(feature 112), at S end, dimensions c 44 x 36 cm
overall. Fill - mottled peat ash staining, grey and brown
sand: a variegated, mottled profile. Some black humic
staining also.
Post-hole with later smaller post-hole cut through it ?
Excavation revealed re-cut post-hole/ stake-hole.
Sample of brown sand discarded 1996 with quartz
flake, coprolite? Present.
112 See 111.
113 Roughly circular dark sand patch, c 22 cm and abutting
S edge of laid stone feature, 056. One small scrap of
pottery excavated.
Probable post-hole.
114 Stake-hole ? with brown sand fill: 10 x 10 x c 19 cm ;
immediately adjacent to stone laid feature 056.
115 Shallow scoop c 20 x 13 x 6 cm, containing a few
mussel fragments and a hammer stone, with a further
cracked stone. Possibly a stake-hole adjacent - c 7.5 x 6
x 13 cm.
Base of shallow scoop, feature ? to N of 056 adjacent
to baulk. [??]
116 Small, irregularly circular patch c 12 x 10 cm. Dark
brown sand and some charcoal ? staining on surface.
Stake-hole or small post ? Undifferentiated fill 18-19
cm deep as excavated.
117 Darkish patch, 13 x 21 cm, collapsed on excavation
and therefore clearly a rabbit disturbance. Looser, less
compact sand fill would tend to differentiate it from the
more compact undisturbed fills of 110, 111 etc. Top
contained a hammer stone.
118 Circular patch of dark sand, c 14 cm N-S x 16 cm E-W
x 23 cm in depth. Feature loosely filled with dark-
brown sand and many shells (sample discarded 1996
suggests limpets>winkles and some mussel).
Possibly collapse over burrow, or small scoop for
disposal of shells, or replacement fill of post-hole ?
Uncertain - with preference for post-hole.
119 Shallow scoop filled with brown sand. Containing one
shell. No depth to this feature, therefore not profiled, c
10 x 9 x 4 cm.
120 Shallow scoop in the sand with brown sand fill,
including broken shell fragment, c 10 x 10 x 5-6 cm.
Minor disturbance of underlying sand - interpret.
121 Large dark patch adjacent to main baulk. On
excavation clearly very rabbit disturbed, with burrow
extending under baulk on E and back under sand on W.
Stones ring the S edge of the hole suggestive of
packing, c 10-15 cm range.
Possibly a stone packed post-hole, disturbed by
burrowing, but equally burrowing and collapse may
have resulted in tipping in of stones on surface.
Possible brown sand feature on N edge - but could also
be collapse of 055 ? (see section drawing – REF
XXXX).
122 Area of dark soil and stones immediately W of 056
(stone feature), on slight downslope from056. Overall
extent c 62 x 50 cm. Central part darker than `lobate
sides', which had a lighter brown sand, stone free, fill.
Large, deep hole filled with stone and dark brown,
fairly loose soil, bordered by a lobate burrow opening,
and a shallower conical lobe, half sectioned badly.
The feature was partially covered with 050 wind-blown
sand and partly with 055.
It seems possible that 122 is a disturbed feature,
perhaps originally a stone-packed post-hole.
alternatively a collapsed stony spread of 055.
123 Dark soil-filled `sausage' shaped patch.
Immediately W of 056 stone feature.
Possible/probable stake/post-hole.
124 Rabbit disturbance (see plan REF XXXXX).
125 Rabbit disturbance (see plan REF XXXXX).
126 Possible post-hole (stone packed), divorced from in
situ deposits by erosion. `Stone packing', 3 stones on
edge, 20 x 13 cm, 25 x 18 cm, 22 x 10 cm, enclosing
soft fill. Not valid fill.
127 Shallow depression against main baulk, c 36 x 20 cm.
Fill of dark brown sand, some peat ash, shell, pot. Pit ?
Midden debris ? Small stake-hole on SW edge ? c 10 x
9 cm deep (from sand surface).
128 Dark patch, lobate, brown sand next to main baulk, c
35 x 25 max. Excavated into shallow E half, deeper W
half, containing some mussel fragments. Possible post-
hole base with shallow E spread.
129 Elongated dark patch, brown sand, c 40 x 20 cm max.
Not strongly suggestive. Excavated to reveal shallow
elongated scoop, depression. Sherd on base, some shell
- winkle, and two small sherds. One stone in section.
Very base of a post-hole ? Possibly a rabbited collapse
of 055.
130 Very shallow, stained brown, sand-filled depression at
N end of 129 - loose fill continues - rabbit disturbance
131 Pocket of humic black sandy soil, 10 cm diam, 4 cm
depth. Prob natural, root or rabbit.
132 Very shallow pocket of brown sand, containing 2
limpets, 1 winkle, 1 flat stone, c 15 x 13 x 2 cm.
Depression in sand surface, filled with 055.
Under 055
133 Mild depressions, discolourations of sand in pockets
134 Rabbit disturbance possibly of a stone lined feature
(large post-hole?), incorporating finds (pot, shell,
bone), into loose, dark brown matrix lying stumped
into collapse of burrow. Half-sectioned, stones returned
into sand, therefore not a real feature.
135 no entry
136 Rabbit burrow - unequivocally - joins to burrow in NE
quadrant via baulk.
137 Possible packing of post-hole but fill completely
destroyed by rabbit disturbance - or pitching of stone
into burrow, major burrow (136) visible on removal of
fill of burrow.
Stones: large for packing but smaller packing stone
too: 25 x 13 x 15 cm; 20 x 12 x 4 cm; 22 x 12 x 8; and
smaller.
Part of 137, 138 ?
138 3 stones set in a soft, yellow sand fill in a rounded hole
visible after removal of 137: maybe pitching of stone
into rabbit disturbance. Stones: 18 x 12 x 8 cm; 20 x 15
x 6; 14 x 8 x 8.
139 no entry
140 no entry
141 Loosely constructed line of stones resting on black
humic material (turf ?) and some midden. To N,
midden and peat ash badly disturbed by rabbits, as is
the wall. To S, 055 and/or sand meets the stones.
Stone sizes: av 20-30 cm length; mainly very friable
degraded schist or gneiss.
Possibly a partition wall in conjunction with turf
footings?
142 Area121/111, 120/111, 122/111; E area of main baulk,
S of temp baulk. Turf `wall' of ancillary structure.
Survives as a mixture of black and brick red humic
material (laid turves show in places as black against the
red - c 16 x 20 cm).
The turf presumably represents part of the E wall/
boundary of a possibly oval feature, c 2 m SE of the
main `building'. The surviving stretch of `wall' is only
1.8 m in extent. The outer edge of the turf `wall' is
bounded by 4 stones still in position. 2 `shadows' in the
sand adjacent to the S most stone may indicate the
position of 2 further stones. The 2 N most stones are
laid longitudinally, while the 2 to the S, are short in
length and laid with their long-axis at right angles to
the wall. Turf remains covered the sides and upper
surfaces of the stones. There was no turf under the
stones.
(An unsuccessful attempt was made to obtain a section
through the `wall' and interior of the structure,
relationship of wall to interior lost by rabbit
burrowing.)
143-50 No entries
151 Location 122/110, 122/111. Mottled sand layer
containing large number of winkles. In 122/111, the
winkles form a solid pile under the first surviving
edging stone in the N. The distribution of the winkles is
confined fairly rigidly to the width of the stone itself,
(extending only for a few centimetres further N of the
stone). The sand under the remaining outer edging
stones contains a much smaller number of shells.
This layer represents eroded midden material ? or a
deliberate deposit under the outer edging stones ?
NB the turf portions of the `wall' are laid on soft
(sterile) yellow sand. Plan included.
001
002
012
094=095
106
021
022
024
043?=025
026
042
041
029
011
014
016 015
019
037=031
034
035
032 036
040
033
038 046 047 048 003
010
017
018
020?
008 009
023?=007
027 030
028
065
083
081
090
150
142
151
104
105
APPENDIX C: SAMPLE LIST
Samples were taken from most contexts, as described above in methodology. A separate
sample list was not prepared.
APPENDIX D: DRAWINGS LIST
A drawing list has not been found in the site records, and will be reconstructed once
the drawings are available
APPENDIX E: PHOTO LIST
A photographic list has not been found in the site records, and is presently being
reconstructed by Dr T. Cowie.
APPENDIX F: FINDS LISTS
All finds from Barvas 1 are held in the National Museums of Scotland.
The finds have already been catalogued and cross-referenced, in order to produce the
reports included in Appendix G. The entries in the tables below are therefore ordered by
catalogue number rather than finds number.
A spreadsheet of the original finds lists, derived from the field notebooks, is appended as
a separate file.
BONE & ANTLER
NB Terms such as spatula, point etc are intended to be descriptive, not functional. All
bone implements have been drawn.
Catalogue
No.
Description Context Find
no.
61 Worked bone point; 52 x max 10 x 4 mm 092 518
62 Utilised bone implement, serrated along one edge for
length of 80 mm; cross-section slightly convex ?; 116 x 17
x 7 mm.
044 227
63 Worked bone spatula with blunt-ended tip (width 9 mm,
but damaged); sides shaped for most of the length,
underside smoothed for c. two-thirds of length from tip;
cross-section slightly concave; 101 x max 25 x 3 mm.
007 511
64 Worked bone point (tip damaged), surfaces smoothed, but
bear short, random incisions; cross-section roughly
triangular; 102 x max 21 x max 20 mm, width 6 mm at tip.
009 512
65 Worked bone point with broken tip; edges uneven; 103 x
10 - 11 x 3 mm.
082 517
66 Worked bone spatula with rounded end, other end broken;
cross-section slightly concave; 42 x 16 x 4 - 5.5 mm.
030 513
67 Fragment of worked bone disc, striations on ext surface;
cross-section flat; 45 x 30 x 3.5 mm.
055 514
68 Worked bone point; 31 x max 10 x 2 mm. 055 515
69 Worked bone awl ? with long, tapering point; 52 x max 6
x 2 mm.
055 516
POTTERY CATALOGUE
The Barvas 1 pottery has already been catalogued and cross-referenced, in order to
produce the report included in Appendix G. The entries in the table below are therefore
ordered by catalogue number rather than finds number.
In order to restrict the length of the entry for each item, a number of recurring features
has been excluded from the individual descriptions: these include colour, smoothing and
abrasion of surfaces, and finger impressions, all of which are described in the discussion
which follows the catalogue. [NB sherds which have been drawn are numbered the same
as cat no.]
Storage:
nos 1-48 are in Barvas 1 Pot Box 4
nos 49-61 are in Barvas 1 Pot Box 4 as aer fabric samples
Catalogue
No.
Description Context Find
no.
1 two rim sherds and joining (4) body sherds of jar with
rounded incurved rim; d 240 mm; th 12 mm; fab A3;
abundant `wipe' marks, partly soot-blackened around rims
122
458
2 rim sherd and joining body sherd of jar with rounded,
incurved rim; d 220 mm; th 10 mm; fab A1; strip of
applied clay visible on int rim edge; band of black soot
ending 25-40 mm from ext rim edge
three poss body sherds from same pot
055 163
3 a) two joining rim sherds
b) two joining rim sherds and three body sherds
c) small rim sherd
d) four joining base sherds - all prob from same jar;
rounded, incurved rim; th 11-12 mm; slightly rounded
basal angle; d 140 mm; wall th 12 mm; base th 20 mm; fab
A2; abundant `wipe' marks on a) and b), grass imp on a)
and d)
seven body sherds poss from same pot, also possible body
sherds from archive cat nos 5, 127, 138, 197
a)d) 134
b) 050
c)006
359
359
421
91
4 rounded rim fragment, similar to P3, but different vessel;
th 12 mm; fab B?:
nine body sherds poss from same vessel.
088 408.
5 rim and joining body sherd of jar, with rounded, slightly
incurved rim; th 13 mm; fab A2; traces of fine `wipe'
marks on ext [grass striations]; band of soot-blackening
extending 35 mm from rim edge; construction break c. 30
mm from edge
surface,
unstrat
26,
38
6 rounded, [slightly] incurved rim; th 12 mm; fab A1; ext
soot-encrusted [, and spall marks 7 mm below top of rim]
poss same pot as P7
068 260
7 rounded, incurved rim; th >8 mm; fab A2; rim-edge soot-
blackened
poss same pot as P6
089 350
8 rim and joining bodysherds of ?jar, with rounded,
probably incurved rim (Reconstruction of rim to body
dubious);
d 180 mm; th 10 mm; fab B; ext uneven [and sooting from
rim edge to 50 mm down]; shallow slanted construction
break 53 mm from rim edge
055 270.
9 rounded, possibly incurved rim; th 10 mm; fab B?
cont 055 -
10 four joining rim sherds and six joining body sherds of
upright jar with rounded rim; d c.320 mm; th 14 mm; fab
A2; int surface uneven, ext patchy soot-blackening;
construction break 48 mm from rim edge
three body sherds from same vessel.
033 490
11 rounded, upright rim; th 11 mm; fab A2; int grass
impression, ext soot-blackening
body sherd poss from same pot
023
023
260
166
12 rounded [slightly angular], upright rim; th 10 mm; fab B
[NB find/context?151 in `typed' catalogue]
also poss body sherd
111 488
13 broad, slightly rounded rim frag; th c.12 mm; fab A2; ext
horizontal striations on rim
two body sherds and three abraded frags, one of which
poss rim; all from same vessel
023
023
159
159,
411
14 broad, rounded rim; th c.12 mm; fab A1
three body sherds poss from same vessel
033
033
232
186,
189
15 slightly flattened rim frag; th c.11 mm; fab A2
four body sherds from same vessel.
023 159
16 flattened rim, [slight internal bevel]; th 9 mm; fab B: /
one body sherd poss from same vessel; uneven ext.
cont 045 437,
cf 18
17 flattened rim frag; th c.12 mm; fab A; int organic
impression, ext blackened
003 70
18 slightly flattened rim frag; th 10 mm; fab A2; ext
blackened [and slightly spalled/laminated]
081 162
19 two joining, flattened rim sherds and body sherd; th 11
mm; d c.240 mm; fab A3; ext faint `wipe' marks visible
023 146
20 two joining, flattened rim sherds and body sherd; th
10mm; d 220-240 mm; fab A3; int grass impressions, ext
`wipe' marks:
023 159
[rim frag from bag marked: cont 055/ find 387]
21 two joining rim sherds and a body sherd of open jar, with
flattened rim; th 10 mm; d 240 mm; fab A2; int very fine
horiz striations, [ext smoothed but lumpy
two sherds from the same vessel
cont 011
011
/ find
176
236
22 flattened rim [with very slight internal bevel]; th 11 mm;
fab A2?; ext blackened, [encrusted residue present]
068 256
23 flattened rim frag; th c.10 mm; fab A2?; ext blackened 041 238
24 flattened rim frag 023 260
25 irregularly flattened rim; th 10 mm; fab B; ext patchy
blackening on rim edge and body; construction break 36
mm below rim edge
004 76
26 broad, angular, flattened rim frag; th 13 mm; fab B; ext
blackened, fine `wipe' marks on rim edge
006 92
27 angular, flattened rim fragment; th c.11 mm; fab A2 023 159
28 broad, angular, flattened rim frag, [organic mark ext]; th
c.12 mm; fab B?
one body sherd from same pot; th 12 mm
033 226
29 broad, slightly flattened rim, with rounded ext rim edge
and int edge angular; th 13 mm; fab A2?; ext soot-
blackening commencing 11 mm from rim edge
057,55 354
30 broad, angular, flattened rim with slight internal
expansion; th 12 mm; fab A2
three body sherds and one poss base [with thick ext
protrusion] from same vessel
007
007
281
135
31 flattened rim sherd, with slight int expansion, and two
joining sherds; th 13 mm; d 240 mm; fab A2; int faint
striations, construction break 35 mm below rim edge
[rim frag and four small frags from same pot]
007 80
32 angular, flattened, int expanded rim; th 9 mm; d 240 mm;
fab A3; ext faint `wipe' marks on rim and wall, soot-
blackening commencing 21-28 mm from rim edge, poss
seed impression, [slight lamination]
084 401
33 angular, int bevelled rim; th 11 mm; fab B?:
one body sherd poss from same pot; th 13 mm.
016 149
34 angular rim, with slight int bevel, th 12 mm; fab B;
[organic temper (chaff)]
009 173
35 angular rim, with slight int bevel [and slight lamination];
th 12 mm; fab A1
023 159
36 slightly angular rim, with int bevel; th 12 mm; fab B:
one body sherd poss same vessel
023a 184
37 slightly angular, very uneven rim, with slight int bevel; th
10 mm; fab A2
030 372
one body sherd poss from same pot.
38 flattened rim with slight int bevel; th 11mm; fab B; rim
edge blackened
twelve body sherds:
and five frags: poss from same vessel.
033
033
033
189
189,
232
206
39 angular rim fragment, with slight internal bevel; fab A2 055 412
40 a) two joining rim sherds and body sherds of jar, with
angular, slightly internally bevelled rim; th 14 mm; d
c.240 mm; fab A2; int patchy blackening on body wall, ext
blackened up to 27 mm from rim edge; shallow, slanting
construction break 28 mm from rim edge.
b) large part of wall of same pot with start of basal angle,
basal angle gently flaring; wall th 14 mm, base th not
known; int patchy soot-blackening and encrustation, ext
fine `wipe' marks visible:
[18 base sherds and frags, and 5 bodysherds, all very
fragmented, poss from same vessel
068
033
256
490
41 flattened rim frag, with slight int bevel; th 8 mm; fab B:
poss same vessel as: find 488 ?
080 425
42 a) rounded rim sherd, with slight external lip, short neck
and slight shoulder; poss from necked jar; d c.100-120
mm; th 7 mm; fab D; int rim edge blackened, ext
blackened:
b) 13 body sherds of same vessel; th c.5-8 mm; int and ext
patchy soot-blackening and/or encrustation
069
055,
069
481
474,
481
43 two poss rim frags:
a) one small, flattened with slight internal bevel; appears
to have been pinched
b) three sherds from second rim, prob rounded; th >11 mm
(these two entries previously P55 & P51).
Unstrat
033
from
bag 5
490
44 two joining sherds with start of slightly flaring basal angle
on int; wall th 11 mm; fab B; int patchy blackening, ext
very fine `wipe' marks, organic impressions
three body sherds poss from same vessel; th 16/17 mm
091
092
415
172,
173,
175
45 three joining base sherds, plus two base sherds and two
wall sherds (not joining) of pot with flaring base and flat
bottom; d c.120 mm; wall th 17 mm; base th 16 mm; fab
A2; int and base ext faint organic impressions, [base rough
005 109
and pitted]
46 two joining base sherds of flat-bottomed pot, with flaring
base and slightly protruding foot; wall th 12 mm; d c. 180
mm; base th 18 mm; fab C; int traces of organic
impressions, [slightly laminated, base pitted on ext]
six body sherds poss from same pot; all similar to vessel
P53.
unstrat find?
47 two joining base sherds and body sherds of flat-bottomed
pot, with flaring base; wall th 17 mm; d c.180 mm; base th
c.18 mm; fab A2/B
068 260
48 probable base sherd, with slight protruding foot and flaring
wall, underside of base is concave, (poss grooved?);[
resembles a carination]; wall th 16 mm; base th not known
[poss c.20 mm]; fab A2; ext and underside of base partly
blackened, horizontal striations visible
{Drawing to be changed}
023 166
49 base made up of numerous sherds and frags; large part of
wall and small portion of basal angle with slight foot and
prob flat base; wall th c.10 mm; fab A
also >10 frags from same vessel.
003 110
50 base sherd; flat base, slight foot; base th c.15 mm; fab A:
two body sherds poss from same vessel.
017 99
51 base sherd with floor missing; slight ext protrusion, poss
foot; wall th 13 mm; fab A:
ten body sherds poss from same vessel.
030 372
52 base sherd; flat base; wall th 13 mm; fab A? (no large rock
grits); organic impression on ext, poss seed impression
010 84
53 small base sherd; slight foot, flat base; wall th c.12 mm;
base th c.15 mm; fab A?
092 353
54 base sherd; flat base, simple basal angle; wall th 11 mm;
base th c.13 mm; fab ?;
poss same pot as P52?
045 -
55 body sherd with steeply sloping construction break; th 12
mm; fab A2/B?; ext partly blackened, some organic
impressions
004 76
56 two joining body sherds with shallow sloping construction
break, (resembles a rimsherd); th 12 mm; fab A2?; ext
mostly blackened with soot encrustation
{still to be drawn}
033 189
57 body sherd with shallow sloping construction break,
(resembles a rimsherd); th 11 mm; fab A?
{still to be drawn}
071 435
58 body sherd with - shaped construction break; th 12 mm;
fab B; int blackened:
106 362
{still to be drawn}
59 body sherd with seed impression; th 15 mm; fab B?; seed
impression 7 mm long; 3.5 mm wide; faint lines running
lengthways
{still to be drawn}
044 282
60 basal sherd, broken at base, but slight foot protruding; 14
mm wide:
{still to be drawn}
189 458
61 Rim? added by Doug MacBeath 1996
42,
115/110
240
Fabric samples including finds nos
107
123? from context 055
139or159
165? from context 087
180
186
195
252
262
281
370
378
433
435
Samples of raw clay including finds nos
46
277
397
431
440
453
CATALOGUE OF STONE
The Barvas 1 stone has already been catalogued and cross-referenced, in order to
produce the report included in Appendix G. The entries in the table below are therefore
ordered by catalogue number rather than finds number.
Cat nos with a prefix `P' have been drawn.
Cat.
no.
Description Context
no.
Finds
no.
Box
no.
PS1 Stone smoother (broken), smoothed surface has fine
multi-directional striations; surviving end pitted; 126
x 98 x 63 mm.
045 467 Box
1
PS2 Utilised stone, heavily battered at broad end,
resulting in detachment of flakes; slightly abraded
(flattened), at narrow end; small area of abrasion on
both faces, probably from use as an anvil; d 17 mm
and 15 mm; 177 x max 80 x 40 mm.
055 389 Box
no 1
PS3 Utilised stone, roughly egg-shaped, with one end
bevelled in two directions, due to abrasion; 80 x max
72 x max 66 mm.
115 345 Box
no 1
PS4 Utilised pebble, battered at both ends; oval in shape;
80 x 55 x 50 mm.
117 344 Box
no 1
PS5 Utilised stone, battered at both ends; oval in shape;
145 x 105 x 80 mm:.
SC 492 Box
no 1
PS6 Utilised stone, battered at broad end and slightly
battered at narrow end; 206 x 80 (tapering to 55) x 60
mm.
SC 495 Box
no 1
PS7 Utilised stone with one surface smoothed; oval in
shape; damaged at one end; 290 x 180 x 90 mm.
SC 494 Box
no 4
PS8 Utilised stone, with band (max 30 mm wide), of
abrasion around wider end; egg-shaped; 100 x 86 x
62 mm.
U/S - Box
no 1
PS9 Utilised stone, with one surface smoothed and a band
of abrasion c. 25 mm wide around c. two-thirds of
the circumference; 130 x 112 x 62 mm.
U/S - 1
PS10 Utilised stone with a narrow ring of abrasion around
c. two-thirds of the surviving edge; circular in shape,
with large flake missing from one surface; 130 x 130
x c. 60 mm.
122 464 1
S11 Utilised stone, slightly battered at one end, slightly
abraded at other; elongated oval in shape; 188 x 60 x
61 - 50 mm.
045 346 1
S12 Stone rubber, one face smoothed; 293 x 185 x 96 mm
SC 044 ?
to
check].
4
The following cat nos. relate to unworked stone
finds unless otherwise stated.
S13 Chert flake; prov none. SC 002 2
S14 Frag of quartz, unworked [chuck?] prov B/O. SC 004 3
S15 Three frags quartz; two frags other [granite],
unworked [chuck?]; prov C/2.
SC 009 3
S16 Three frags quartz, unworked [chuck?]; prov C/0. SC 010 3
S17 Quartz flake; 20 mm; prov B/1. SC 012 3
S18 Three frags quartz, one def unworked; 20 - 45 mm;
frag flint; 35 mm; prov B/2.
SC 013 2&3
S19 Two frags quartz, unworked [chuck?]; prov C/1. SC 015 3
S20 Two flint flakes; five frags quartz; two other,
unworked [chuck?]; prov E of baulk.
003 019 2&3
S21 Two frags quartz; one piece chert; no prov. SC 024 2&3
S22 Hammerstone; struck flint; prov B/3. SC/02 030 2
S23 Frag flint; 20 mm; prov C/3, C/4, O/3. 003 032 2
S24 Three stone frags, unworked [chuck?]; prov C/3. 003 034 3
S25 Flake/`thumbnail scraper', flint; no prov. 003 040 2
S26 Three stone frags, prob natural, unworked [chuck?];
prov B/2.
SC 046 3
S27 One frag quartz, unworked?; prov B/1. SC 047 3
S28 Hammerstone/ pebble; no prov. SC 049 2
S29 Four frags quartz, unworked [chuck?]; 10 mm; frag
flint; 15 mm; prov A/13.
SC 051 2&3
S30 Two frags quartz, unworked [chuck?]; max 30 x 30
mm; prov A/13.
SC 053 3
S31 Quartz flake; three flakes flint, at least one worked;
prov B/3.
SC 055 2&3
S32 Two pieces of stone; prov 110 - 110. SC 061 ?
S33 One lump, prob natural; one flake quartz, poss
worked; prov 95 - 100.
SC 063 3
S34 Hammerstone; frag quartz; prov 115 - 110. 003 071 2&3
S35 Hammerstone pebble; quartz frag, prob unworked;
quartz flake; prov 115 - 110.
004 072 2&3
S36 Two frags quartz, prob unstruck; prov 95 - 105. SC 075 3
S37 Flint flake; prov 115 - 110. 007 081 2
S38 Quartz frag, prob unstruck?; prov 115 - 110, 120 -
110.
011 127 3
S39 Piece struck quartz (flake); prov 115 – 110. 011 140 3
S40 Flint flake; one frag quartz, prob unworked; prov 115
- 110.
023 142 2&3
S41 Two small quartz frags, one flint frag; prov 115 -
110.
011 148 2&3
S42 Poss worked piece quartz?; prov 115 - 110. 024 157 3
S43 Two pebbles; one cracked pebble, poss utilised; prov
115 - 110.
023 158 2
S44 Worked flint flake; prov 115 - 115. 019 198 2
S45 Very small quartz frags, prob not struck; prov 115 -
115.
036 208 3
S46 Flint flake; prov 115 - 110. 037 224 2
S47 Frag stone, natural flake ?; 30 mm; prov mixed
laminated sand.
050 286 2
S48 Five frags quartz, all unworked [chuck?]; 20 mm; fl
[?] frag 25 mm; four other frags 10 mm; prov 115 –
115.
002 295 ? 2&3
S49 One stone flake, poss struck; one piece quartz; see
also pumice find 328a; prov 115 – 115.
002 382 2&3
S50 Stone; 80 mm; two frags 20 mm; prov 115 – 110. 050 384 3
S51 Piece cracked quartz pebble, poss struck ?; frag
other, poss natural [chuck?]; prov 115 - 110.
057 399a 3
S52 Stone flake with poss feature; see pumice find 402;
prov 115 - 110.
030 402a 2
S53 Stone frag; prov 118 - 114. 068 418 3
S54 Utilised quartz pebble; 70 mm; prov 118 - 115. 088 432 3
S55 Quartz frag; prov 118 – 114. 089 460 3
S56 Long rough stone; 165 x 45 mm; prov unknown. 122 465 2
S57 worked stone, large frags struck from edges and one
side; 160 x 140 mm.
`peat ash
layer'/
466 2
S58 Quartz frag; prov Nth temp baulk. 069 489 3
S59 Quartz pebble, damaged one end; 120 x 70 mm. SC 493 2
S60 Pebble frag, poss struck ?; 100 x 130 mm; prov 119 –
110.
055 525 2
S61 Flint flake; 25 x 30 mm; prov 117 - 110. 107+ 109 526 ?
S62 Two quartz frags, not worked; 5 mm; prov Nth of t
baulk.
069 527 3
S63 Two pebbles poss utilised; 60 mm; two prob natural
stones.
US (bag 1) - ?
also added by Doug MacBeath 1996
stone probably from a bucket sample
U/S (bag
1)
- 2
CATALOGUE OF PUMICE
NB Cat nos which have a double `P' relate to drawn sherds i.e. published cat.
Storage:
All pumice is in stone and pumice box no. 5, except cat. nos. 17 & 27, which are in box no. 4
Cat.
No.
Description Context
no.
Finds
no. PP1 Irregular pumice disc with central perforation; d 11 mm
narrowing to 3.5 mm; made from one face only; surfaces
smoothed; 29 x 25 x 10 mm
011 118
PP2 Small lump of pumice with two grooves in one surface;
grooves measure 32 x 8; 22 x 5 mm; 48 x 34 x 25.
015 085
PP3 Irregular pumice disc, with angled sides and roughly
central, incomplete perforation; d at surface 4 mm; all
surfaces smoothed; 38 x 36 x 13 mm
021 145
PP4 Irregular lump of pumice, with one groove, measuring 52
x 6 mm, and a tentative right angled groove (2 grooves
meeting?), measuring 14 + 12 mm x width 8 mm, where
surviving; 84 x 70 x 47.
030 428
PP5 Irregular, cone-shaped lump of pumice, with three
surfaces (including base), smoothed; base 34 x max 31
mm; h 19 mm.
SC 025
P6 Irregular lump of pumice with at least 4 slight grooves, 3
of which are on one surface; grooves measure 15 x 3; 30
x 2; 11 x ?; 33 x 6 mm; 61 x 55 x 45 mm:
002 382a
P7 Smoothed lump of pumice, apparently broken; 49 x 51 x
48 mm.
002 022
P8 Five unworked lumps of pumice; 35 x 30 x 20; 30 x 27 x
20; 35 x 24 x 16; 25 x 15 x 11; 33 x 30 x 15 mm.
002 022,
382a
P9 Unworked lump of pumice: 54 x 45 x 35 mm. 033 036.
P10 Irregular lump of pumice, possibly utilised; one surface
concave and smoothed; 45 x 22 x 17 - 21 mm:
004 113
P11 Four unworked pieces of pumice; 22 x 15 x 15; 32 x 24 x
16; 16 x 13 x 9; 16 x 10 x 4 mm.
007 293,
281a,
287
P12 Large lump of pumice with two possible grooves,
measuring 63 x 10 (curved around surface); c. 58 x 15?
mm; 100 x 90 x 72 mm.
011 124
P13 Large lump of pumice (prob natural), with 4 grooves; 37
x 4; 34 x ?; 41 x 9; 30 x 7 mm; 160 x 140 x 111 mm.
011 491
P14 Unworked lump of pumice; 70 x 53 x max 43 mm.
011 230
P15 Small lump of pumice with 2? surfaces smoothed; 25 x
18 x max 17 mm.
023 159
P16 Small fragment of pumice, with one surface smoothed; 20
x max 17 x 11 mm.
023 114
P17 Large, irregular lump of pumice with possible groove,
measuring 45 x 11 - 13 mm; c. 182 x 157 x 115 mm.
030 258
P18 Roughly triangular lump of pumice with surfaces
smoothed or worn; 37 x max 30 x 20 mm.
030 402
P19 Lump of pumice with rounded, smoothed surfaces,
heavily worn/ smoothed at rounded end, broken; 41 x 46
x 33 mm.
030 402
P20 Irregular lump of pumice with asymmetrical perforation
in one face (max 13 x 16 mm at surface); 45 x 31 x max
30 mm.
050 473
P21 Small lump of pumice with two opposing surfaces
possibly smoothed; 30 x 21 x 19 mm.
055 459
P22 Lump of pumice with concave, worn/ smoothed area; 51
x 45 x max 36 mm.
057 399
P23 Small, unworked lump of pumice, with worn/ smoothed
apex; 33 x 38 x 21 mm.
068 or 069 342
P24 Unworked lump of pumice; 72 x 84 x 42 mm. 070 278
P25 Two irregular lumps of pumice, unworked; 113 x 72 x
33; 55 x 21 x 18 mm
SC 25 &
56
P26 Lump of pumice with two slight grooves in one surface
measuring 30 x 6; 30 x 5 mm; 54 x 47 x 35 mm.
cont US find
343
P27 added by Doug Macbeath 1996:
--2 fragments of possible burnt pumice
? 293
APPENDIX G: EXISTING FINDS REPORTS
These finds reports are included as presented, without editing, in order to give a clear
understanding as to the present state of all the evidence, and to enable an accurate
assessment of the further needs of the material.
POTTERY REPORT
Rosemary Cowie
The Barvas I pottery assemblage comprises of some 800 sherds weighing 10,700 g, of
which 44 are rim sherds and 13 are base sherds. All the pottery is hand-made and
undecorated. None of the body sherds show any diagnostic features, and for this reason,
have not been catalogued separately. Eight of the body sherds do, however, show
construction breaks and four of these sherds have been catalogued to show the different
types of construction break represented in the assemblage (55-58).
The fabric of the pottery varies from coarse to very coarse. Fabric groups have been
identified on the basis of representative sherds selected for thin-sectioning.
(Insert fabric groups)
The most frequent colour combination shown by sherds in the assemblage is that of an
orange exterior, with a grey core and interior. Sherds with orange interiors and exteriors,
with light to dark grey cores, are also fairly common. The assemblage also contains a
number of fully oxidised sherds, which are brick orange in colour, and a few reduced
sherds which are grey throughout. Colour can, of course, vary widely over individual
sherds, not to mention over an entire pot. Black staining occurs frequently on both
interior and exterior surfaces of sherds. It is present on the exterior surface of sixteen of
the 44 rim sherds, a fact which may relate to the method of firing used,[where the pots
were inverted.]
In general, the exterior surface of the pottery, and frequently the interior surface also,
have a smooth finish. A high degree of smoothing, however, is apparent on only four of
the rim sherds (21, 32, 34, 35), these being fattened or angular rims. In some cases a type
of brush appears to have been used to finish the pot surface: bands of horizontal
striations appear on certain body sherds (5, 13, 20) [poss created from grass smoothing],
while a number of rim sherds bear a variety of rough, criss-cross wipe marks on their
exterior surfaces (32, 40 b, 44). Finger impressions are widespread, especially on rims
and bases.[On one sherd (59), a possible seed impression lies on the exterior surface.]
Construction breaks are visible on only seven of the rim sherds and eight of the body
sherds. Three types of break are represented: a gentle slope from exterior to interior (56,
illus x..), a steep slope from exterior to interior (55, illus x..), and a - shaped
construction break, of which there is one clear example from the assemblage (58, illus
x..).
The 44 rim sherds appear to represent a minimum of 42 pots, but this figure may well be
inaccurate, owing to the high degree of variability characteristic of the rims of prehistoric
pots. In addition, the majority of the rims from the assemblage are too fragmentary to
permit an accurate assessment of form or fabric. The rim sherds can, however, be
divided into two broad categories- rounded rims and flattened rims- with a single
exception, discussed below.
The rounded rims, of which there are 14, in turn fall into two categories - incurved and
upright. the incurved group contains 7 examples (1-7), and two possible examples (8, 9).
Five of the group have parts of the body wall surviving (1-4, 8), and are of `jar' form.
The upright rim group is best represented by 10 (illus x..). Nos 11 and 12 may be of
similar type to no 10, and nos 13 and 14 are broader, rounded rims, but again possibly
upright in type. The last four rim sherds mentioned are unfortunately too fragmentary to
permit a more accurate description.
There are 27 flattened rim sherds and these can be subdivided into three general groups:
The first group contains eleven examples of rims which are roughly horizontal, with the
width of the rim edge ranging between 8-10 mm (15-25) [one possible flat rim is much
narrower at 6 mm (61)]; the second group comprises seven examples (26-32, three of
which, 30-32, all have some degree of internal expansion), which are again roughly
horizontal but with the width at the rim edge ranging between 11-15 mm (average width
13 mm); the third and final group, containing eight examples , is characterised by its
angularity and the possession of a slight internal bevel (nos 34-41), and the rim with
ranges from 8-12 mm (average width 10 mm). In general, the flattened or angular rims
appear to have a higher degree of smoothing than the rounded rim sherds. Only three of
the 27 rims, however, have part of the wall profile surviving (illus x..).
Lastly, mention must be made of the one rim sherd (42), which does not fall into the
categories outlined above. This is a rim of everted type, apparently coming from a small
necked jar (illus x..). It is thin-walled and quite dissimilar in fabric from the rest of the
Barvas I assemblage.
Turning now to the base sherds, there are 13 examples (3d, 40b, 44-54), but in only two
cases (3, 40), does a substantial portion of the base survive. The basal angle is normally
of a gentle, flaring type, and some of the base sherds (eg 46), have a slight protruding
foot, probably owing to a combination of finger-tipping and the protrusion of large grits.
The underside of the base tends to be flat, unsmoothed and occasionally pitted, but one
probable base sherd (48, illus x..), is an exception to this in that the small fragment of
underside which remains, is not only smooth, but appears to have been grooved.
THE ANIMAL BONE, with particular reference to mammals.
Mary Harman
All the bone was examined, and groups from different squares and levels were sorted
into mammal, bird and fish bones, which were weighed. All rabbit bones, mainly from
surface collection groups, were ignored, being replaced in their bags but not weighed or
listed. All weights are given in grammes. All identifiable pieces from each layer were
listed, and both these and unidentifiable fragments were weighed.
The material from surface collection cannot well be compared with the bones from the
excavation as it contains a smaller proportion of fish and a larger proportion of teeth to
other mammal bones than that from the excavated groups; this is probably partly due to
the collection methods, as the surface material was not sieved, but may also occur
because bones other than teeth, particularly fish bones, are likely to decay more rapidly
on an exposed surface than when buried, and in addition, fish bones, being small and
relatively light, are liable to be blown away. All the excavated spoil was sieved in 1/4"
mesh sieves.
In the identification of the mammal bone, rib fragments and vertebrae have been listed as
large (cattle size) or small (sheep size) but normally were not further identified, and have
been included in the counts of total numbers of bones under cattle and sheep. It is
possible that some of the bones identified as sheep are from goats, though no evidence of
goats was recognised.
Most of the bone is remarkably well preserved, though some of the pieces from Barvas I
were fragile and required conservation. There was a high proportion by weight of
splinters and long bone shaft fragments which were not identifiable, and this unusually
high proportion may be attributed partly to the rigorous collecting methods.
The ages of the animals have been assessed where possible from the size, and the state of
epiphyseal fusion and of tooth eruption, based on the criteria published by Silver (1963,
250-268).
BARVAS I
The site yielded very little bone, scarcely enough to come to many conclusions
concerning the economy of the inhabitants of the site. It is clear from Table 1, showing
the total weights of bone from different classes of animals found on the site, that fish
bones account for a fairly small proportion of the amount of bone excavated, and most of
that (352g) came from a single feature (069) which was exceptional in producing more
fish than mammalian bone. In all other features, both bird and fish bones form a
negligible contribution to the total quantity.
Table 2 shows that the majority of the identifiable bone came from cattle and sheep, pig
and red deer being represented by a few fragments. Different parts of the body of cattle
and sheep seem to be fairly evenly represented with no emphasis on meat or waste
bones, and the bones are derived from animals of different ages: very young, juvenile
and mature.
It seems reasonable to conclude that if this sample is representative, cattle and sheep
were of prime importance in the pastoral economy, with a few pigs also, and small scale
exploitation of game and fish. Two, possibly three, of the pieces of antler found were
cast, and may indicate deliberate or casual collection for use, but the deer bones suggest
hunting, though they may have come from a chance cadaver. The fragment of bone
from one of the larger whales may have been taken from a stranded animal.
TABLES
Table 1. Barvas I: Total weights in g. of bone from different classes.
Mammal Bird Fish
Identified Not
identified
Total
Excavated 1,737* 1,397 3,134 15 419
Surface
Collection
832 656 1,488 6 25
* + 325g cetacean bone
Table 2. Barvas I: Excavated levels: numbers of fragments derived from
different parts of the skeletons of different species
found on the site.
Cattle Sheep
L Undet. R L Undet. R
Skull 1 8 2 3
Maxilla 3 3
Mandible 3 1 2 3
Tooth 32 33
Vertebra 5 8
Rib 13 30
Scapula 3 4 1 1 2
Humerus 2 1 1 3 1 2
Radius+ulna 2 4 2 3
Metacarpal 1 5 1 6 2
Pelvis 2 1 3 1
Femur 1 2 1 6 1
Tibia 1 1 5 7 3
Astragalus 2 1 1
Calcaneum 1
Scappho
cuboid
1
Metatarsal 2 8
Phalanx 1 2 1 2 2
Phalanx 2 2
Phalanx 3 2 2 1
Total 104 158
+ Pig: vertebra 1, ulna R, metapodial 1.
Red Deer: antler 4 fragments, phalanx 1 L, phalanx 2
L+R.
Cetacean: fragment from large whale.
Surface collection: total numbers of fragments from different species.
Cattle: 54, Sheep: 82, Pig: 1, Red Deer: 1.
FISH REMAINS FROM BARVAS MACHAIR, LEWIS, HEBRIDES
Sarah Colley and Clive Denby
INTRODUCTION
Sampling
All excavated soil was wet or dry sieved through a 10-mm mesh. In addition a sample of
each layer, usually one bucketful, was wet sieved through a 2.5mm sieve. Tables I and
II show differences in the recovery of species and sizes of cod dentary and premaxilla
(the most common measurable bone) from the two mesh sizes for Layers 08, 09 and 45
(Area A). These layers produced the most fish bone and the widest range of species and
the pattern of recovery from them is representative of the site as a whole.
The 10mm mesh was as efficient in recovering the main species as the 2.5mm mesh. In
addition a much wider range of species and sizes was recovered in the 10mm fraction.
These results are in direct contrast to those obtained from sieving experiments elsewhere,
where a smaller mesh size resulted in the recovery of more species and smaller sizes
(Payne 1975, Wheeler and Jones 1976). The discrepancy can be explained in terms of
sample size. The majority of excavated soil from each layer was passed through the
10mm mesh, while only a small amount was passed through 2.5mm. This small sample
was not representative of the range of variability in the whole layer and consequently
unusual species and less common size categories were missed.
However, an unknown number of very small species could originally have been present
and passed unnoticed through both mesh sizes, even the 2.5mm. A maximum mesh size
of 1mm is recommended by the authors for the recovery of very small fish remains.
Identification and Recording
The fish were identified to species or group and skeletal element or part of fish using the
modern comparative collection of fish skeletons at the Faunal Remains Project,
University of Southampton. Unusual or difficult specimens were taken to the Fish
Section at the British Museum (Natural History), London.
Fish of the cod family, Gadidae, predominated throughout, and within such a group not
all skeletal elements are equally diagnostic to species. Therefore only those gadoid
bones considered to be most diagnostic and which could be usefully measured were
identified to species. Other less diagnostic elements were assigned only to the group
Gadidae and to the exact skeletal element or part of the fish. For example, most
elements of the neurocranium were classified as skull bones and no attempt was made to
distinguish different types of branchial bone. All other non-gadoid bones were identified
as far as possible to species or group and skeletal element. These different levels of
identification are outlined in Figure 1.
Where appropriate the major head bones were assigned to the left or right side of the
body and each fragment was examined for signs of butchery, gnawing and pathology.
The state of fragmentation and condition of the material (where burnt or eroded) was
noted. A series of measurements were taken on gadoid bones identified to species, to the
nearest 0.1 mm. These were selected from those suggested by Morales and Rosenlund
(1979), Wheeler and Jones (1976) and by Pirjo Lahtipera (pers. comm.) and were chosen
for the following reasons. Firstly, they could most often be taken given the fragmentary
nature of much of the bone. Secondly, they were unambiguous and easily replicable and
so were considered useful for comparison with material from other sites. Finally some
of them could be used directly to reconstruct fish sizes based on work already published.
Additional measurements which are not included in the analysis were also taken and are
listed in the archive. Although vertebrae were identified to species they were not
measured. Thoracic vertebrae were however assigned to one of three size categories (see
Figure 1).
All the data were recorded in coded form on standardized recording sheets which form
the archive upon which this report is based. Copies of the archive are available on
request from the authors.
BARVAS I FISH BONES
Excavations at Barvas I revealed the fragmentary remains of an indeterminate structure
and enclosed floor level, thought likely to date to the Bronze Age. A dense scatter of
midden material in the surrounding area strongly suggests that the site was originally
more extensive. However, the very poor state of preservation and the fact that the area
was disturbed by rabbit burrows made archaeological interpretation very difficult.
Fish remains were recovered from disturbed surface layers before excavation and from
23 archaeological contexts. These contexts were identified during excavation as discrete
pockets of material but their stratigraphic relationship is unclear, making comparison
between layers impossible. One context, Layer 69, produced the bulk of the fish
remains. This was a dense pocket of midden and peat ash in the make-up of the former
stone revetted wall of the structure. It seems likely that Layer 69 survived because it was
protected by the wall, while other more exposed layers outside the structure were eroded
away (T Cowie, pers. comm.).
Table III shows the number of fragments identified to species or group from surface
material, Layer 69 and all other contexts grouped together. A total of 775 fragments
were examined of which 22% were identifiable to species. 87% of the material came
from Layer 69. Apart from a single unidentified parasphenoid in Layer 55, only three
species were represented. 70.8% of the identified fragments were cod (Gadus morhua)
followed by 26.3% ling (Molva molva) and only 2.9% saithe (Pollachius virens).
Apart from Layer 69 the sample sizes are so small that comparison between contexts is
meaningless. In Layer 69 bones from different parts of the skeleton were present in
proportions suggesting whole fish. One bone showed signs of butchery, namely a ling
caudal vertebra with a superficial knife cut running medio-laterally across the ventral
side, which could have been made when the fish was filleted.
So few bones from Barvas I were measurable that no firm conclusions can be drawn
about the range of sizes represented in the material. The 17 cod and 4 ling
measurements listed in Table IV were compared with those taken on modern
comparative fish of known length and weight to provide an approximation of the original
size of the fish. The ling measurements compare with large fish having lengths in the
region of 115cm upwards. The cod measurements mostly compare with those from fish
with lengths around 1m with a few smaller specimens around 70cm. None of the five
saithe bones were measurable but they represent medium or large fish probably in excess
of 0.5m in length.
Figure 1 Barvas Fish Remains - Levels of Identification
SAMPLE
GADOID ALL OTHER BONES
Identified to group only: Fragments*
Skull bones
Facial bones
Brunchial bones
Upper pharyngeals
Basihyal
Epihyal
Interhyal
Scapula
Coracoid
Pelvis
Pterygoid
Operculum
Suboperculum
Interoperculum
Basioccipital
Identified to species where
possible - otherwise Gadoid
Hyomandibular
Urohyal
Maxilla
Cleithrum
Postclavicle
Supraclavicle
Ethmoid
Preoperculum
Symplectic
Precaudal vertebra
Caudal vertebrae
Identified to species and
measured (see below) Articular
Dentary
Premaxilla
Quadrate
Parasphenoid
Vomer
Otolith
Ceretohyal
Palatine
Post-temporal
Identified to species and size
categorized Atlas vertebra
Thoracic vertebrae
Identified to species or group
and skeletal element or part
of fish
Size estimate based on
comparison with modern
material from fish of known
size and weight
* N.B. Gadoid branchiostegals,
fin rays and spines were
counted with fragments.
Measurements Following (1) Wheeler and Jones 1976, (2) Morales and Rosenlund 1979, (3) Pirjo Lahtipera (pers. comm.). Articular - greatest
medio lateral breadth of articular surface (2); Dentary - anterior height* (2), depth across proximal edge of foramen (1); Premaxilla - greatest length
of ascending process and articular process* (2), width across base of ascending and articular Parasphenoid - smallest medio-lateral breadth (2);
Vomer - greatest medio-lateral breadth (2); Orolith - greatest length; Ceratohyal - smallest height *(3); Paletine - greatest width of articular; surface*
(3); Post-temporal - height of ventral articulation* (3); length of ventral articulation* (3). Size categories (atlas and thoracic vertebra) - height of
centrum - Tiny - less than 2mm; Small 2-5mm; Medium - 5-15mm; Large greater than 15mm. * Listed in the archive only and not included in the
analysis.
Table I
Representation of species in samples sieved through 10mm and 2.5mm
Species
Gadoid
Cod
Ling
Saithe
Ballan wrasse
Haddock
Conger eel
Hake
Herring
Plaice
Torsk
Angler fish
Flatfish NFI
Gurnard NFI
Cottid NFI
Rockling NFI
Flounder
Mackeral
Shore rockling
Spurdog
_____________
Total no. of species
present
Layers 08
10mm 2.5mm
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
_____________
10 6
Layers 09
10mm 2.5mm
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
_____________
15 4
Layer 45
10mm 2.5mm
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
_____________
12 5
Table III
BARVAS I. Fishbone totals for species and contexts
Species Surface All
Contexts
(except
069)
069 Total
Cod 8 1 115 124
Ling - 20 26 46
Saithe 3 2 - 5
Total frags
indent to Sp
11 23 141 175
Gadoid
frags ident'
to anat
5 13 84 102
Total frags
indent. to
sp. and/or
anat
16 36 225 277
Unidenti
fied
fragments
16 32 450 498
Total No of
Fragments
32 68 675 775
Table IV
BARVAS I
Fishbone measurements (mm)
Cod
Otolith length 19.3
17.9
15.2
Vomer width 28.0
29.4
Dentary depth 8.9
Premaxilla width 15.2
13.8
12.4
15.0
10.8
Parasphenoid width 9.8
Quadrate width 14.7
Articular width 13.4
13.0
13.1
11.8
Thoracic vertebrae 1 small
3 medium
2 large
Ling
Parasphenoid width 6.8
Quadrate width 13.6
13.1
Articular width 16.7
Thoracic vertebra 2 medium
1 large
PLANT REMAINS BARVAS MACHAIR, LEWIS
C DICKSON
Two samples from the Bronze Age deposits, Site I, yielded three genera.
Site I
Hordeum vulgare L. emend (hulled six-row barley). Eight grains of barley were
identified; three with adherent pale fragments are of hulled barley, the others lack pales
probably due to the poor state of preservation.
The only other identifiable remains are one nutlet of Carex sp. (sedge) and Rumex sp.
(dock or sorrel).
APPENDIX H: COASTAL SURVEY RECORDS
Coast erosion survey: extract from draft gazetteer
B 94 MM 2
Aird Barvas
NB 3542 5315
Shieling-huts, cultivation, field wall Three shieling-huts are situated on a knoll c 30m from the cliff edge at NB 3542 5315,
and these are probably associated with areas of cultivation on the slopes to the NE
running down to Feadan Codal, and beyond. The dimensions of the huts, from S to N, are
c 7 by 4-5m; 3 by 3m and 4 by 4m; their walls are of indeterminate width in each case
due to collapse. Altitude: 30m.
A substantial embanked stone wall, c 2-3m wide, running inland from NB 3540 5313
marks the northern margin of the former cultivated land of Barvas township.
PM/MOD/U
B 95 MM 2, DM 6
Barvas Machair North
Centred NB 353 523
Deflation areas, field walls, cultivation, pottery scatters Large areas of active erosion are present on the northern rim of Barvas machair. Apart
from a few `mesa' type knolls, the vegetated surface has been stripped to the original land
surface directly overlying rock and till, on which there are numerous stretches of field
wall and other more indeterminate walling, rectilinear features and traces of cultivation.
Where the machair deposits still survive, the exposed faces (up to 1.5m in height) suggest
that there have been earlier ephemeral phases of stabilisation. Altitude: between 30-40m
contours.
Centred NB 3536 5243: the original/underlying ground surface consists of dark gritty
stony sand resting on greenish boulder clay, and has been exposed by erosion over a large
area c 100 by 150m within which a few residual knolls of turf-capped windblown sand
still survive. The area contains cultivation ridges (oriented roughly N-S), traces of several
stretches of orthostatic field walls at various orientations, and also two low clearance
cairns c 5m diameter. A stony area near the lazy bedding could be the amorphous remains
of clearance or of indeterminate structures. A scatter of shell and abraded pottery
probably represents spread of redeposited midden material. Undiagnostic sherds totalling
213.1gms were recovered in 1978.
Centred NB 3520 5210: this deflation area contains an indeterminate rectilinear structure
and further stretches of field wall.
Two phases of activity may be represented, the earlier represented by a large cleared area
associated with field banks and stone clearance heaps, which are apparently traversed by
a later series of field banks. Traces of similar features were located in smaller areas of
erosion to the N of the burial ground and probably represent the continuation of the same
agricultural complex.
PM/MOD/U
B 96 MM 2, DM 6
Cladh Mhuire
NB 3530 5173 but NB 3531 5173 on map
Burial ground, church (site) The site of Cladh Mhuire probably occupies a knoll within the burial ground, but no
traces of the structure are visible. The extended cemetery is still in use. Altitude: c 30m.
NB 35 SE 7
Martin 1716, 27; ONB 8B, 35-36; RCAHMS 1928, 10, no 25
MED/PM/MOD
B 97 MM 2, DM 6, POT E.16-22
Barvas Machair
NB 3516 5190
Settlement, midden, deflation surfaces Large areas of active erosion are present N and NW of the burial ground (B 26) where
there are a series of well-developed dunes up to c 10m in height which have formed on an
old ground surface directly overlying rock and till. Much rabbit activity was apparent.
Midden material had been noted by the OS in a large hollow measuring c 50 by 40m
within the dunes; when examined in 1978, there was a spread of redeposited midden
material including pottery (totalling 269.5gms), shell, bone and iron-working debris. This
spread of unstratified material appeared to lie in bare sand on the original ground surface
overlying till; elsewhere in the hollow, however, was what appeared to be an undisturbed
bench of midden material associated with indeterminate but clearly structural stonework.
Where exposed, the matrix of the midden was composed of reddish brown sand with
plentiful shell, especially limpet and winkle. In a further area which had been partially
recolonised by plants, a line of stones suggested further structural material might still
survive in situ.
In view of the recovery of diagnostically Norse sherds, this site was investigated further in
1979 (= Barvas 1979/2), since surface indications suggested the survival of only a
remnant shelf of midden material, perhaps protected by some walling. In the event
however, excavation revealed that the site was substantially more intact and richer in
deposits than first suspected. The site can now be seen to consist of a mound of dense
midden deposits up to c 1.5m thick, encapsulating at least two structures of indeterminate
size and form. Partial excavation indicated that these were probably sub-rectangular with
double-skinned walls, the cores being filled with turf and redeposited midden.
Diagnostically Norse pottery indicates a 10/11th century date.
Although the contractors' operations have not as yet encroached on the area of the Norse
settlement, the environs of this site have been altered radically as a result of recent sand
quarrying by DH McLeod Ltd. The area requires urgent re-assessment.
NB 35 SE 16
DES 1979, 47; Cowie forthcoming
VIK/PM/MOD