Artificial Intelligence and Law - Talk I
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Artificial Intelligence and Law - Talk I
Artificial Intelligence&
LawSameer Khan
Centre for Neural and Cognitive SciencesUniversity of Hyderabad
Preview
● Enhancing curriculum ○ Coursework
■ Psychology, reasoning, intelligence, AI■ Rhetoric, persuasion, knowledge representation■ Computer literacy (coding)■ Communication & Systems Theories
○ Culture of Seminars and Colloquia ○ Collaboration
■ Scholar-Scholar vs Student-Teacher relationships
○ Assessment and Evaluation
Preview
● Nature of Algorithms○ Systems perspective○ Memory○ Parallelly Distributed Processing (PDP)
● Nature's Algorithms○ Emergence○ Intelligence○ Law
● Algorithms are Nature○ Experience an algorithm for creativity
Preview
● Judiciary: System of Prescriptive Laws○ Having and maintaining law and order
● Use of AI in law and order situations○ Military and Industrial Grade AI○ Civilian Grade AI
■ Check for plagiarism■ Legal analytics
● Issues of law and order due to AI○ Credit assignment problem○ Jurisprudence issues
Nature of Algorithms: Systems
● System: "A collection of things and relationships between those things"○ Systems may have subsystems and atomized
components ○ Is judiciary a system?○ What are its subsystems and components?○ Is it a part of a larger system?
● What is not a system?
Nature of Algorithms: Memory
● Memory: "persistence of a physical configuration within spacetime"○ A system has memory due to its physicality○ Change in memory entails change in physicality○ Change in memory is "information"
● Parallelly distributed processing: "information processed by networked systems"
Nature of Algorithms
● Algorithm: "set of ordered instructions that channelize information"○ typically, language of mathematics is used to read
and write algorithms○ algorithms can also be considered as cascade of
function mappings ○ any system can implement an algorithm provided
■ the instructions are compatible with system configuration
Nature's Algorithms: Emergence
Complex behavior emerges from simple rules iterated over spacetimedue to stochasticity and dynamism
Nature's Algorithms: Intelligence● Intelligence is an emergent phenomenon
○ Interactivity and reordering within systems to
achieve precision in information processing
■ Processed information can be harbored as
symbol-meaning bindings
■ Processed information contributes to means-
goals mappings
○ Embodiment of such capacities afford the system
certain actions within an environment (situation)
Nature's Algorithms: Law● Nature's algorithms are law
○ Science perspective: A law cannot be broken
○ Scientists excavate such laws and not invent them
■ Laws are described by use of "models"
○ Examples:
■ Entropy: "In this universe, change happens"
Algorithms are Nature: Creativity
● Let us implement and realize an algorithm:○ parallel processors (audience)○ hard disk (paper and pen)
■ randomly choose a sound si from set S = {consonants AND vowels}
■ construct word z = s1s2s3s4 by concatenation over si
■ assign arbitrary meaning to z
Judiciary: System of Prescriptive Laws● Why isn't there a law concerning scratching
your chin with an active chainsaw?● Prescriptions are concerned with efficacious
societal functions○ Politico-socio-economic functions (relations)○ Issues arise due to a multitude of reasons
● Here is one more reason:○ All human relations are technology mediated
■ politico-socio-economic-technological relations
Note: Definition of technology● All that which enhances human capacity is
called technology○ does not endow new capacity
■ weaponry enhances capacity to aggress or withstand aggression
■ language enhances capacity to articulate and reason● words, script, syntax, etc are indeed
technology■ chairs enhance capacity to be lazy
Judiciary: Legal Reasoning and Criteria
● As a whole, is a judicial system an intelligent
system?○ If yes, how?
○ If no, how? (Why are we still using a dumb
system?)
Judiciary: Legal Reasoning and Criteria● Legality implies that there exists a criteria for
assessing veridicality and applicability of a
statement, given a context.
Judiciary: Legal Reasoning and Criteria● Veridical statements applicable in a context
○ Where then did this criteria come from?
○ How was the context ascertained?
○ What form of knowledge representation was
used for expressing the rules?
○ What course of action was taken to implement
the rule? Was the desired realization achieved?
Application of AI: ● Logic: ordered collection of veridical statements
(information)● Context: Knowledge discovery and representation
The above two things can be done by intelligent systems
Example of Industrial Strenght AI: Unmanned Vehicles, Google, BlueGene - Whatson
Application of AI: ● Logic: ordered collection of veridical statements
(information)● Context: Knowledge discovery and representation
[Video of Biomimetic AI]
Application of AI: Legal Analytics ● Logic oriented:
○ Theorem proving algorithms for argument checking
○ Pattern recognition within cases (ontologies)○ Identification of judgment bias
● Context discovery oriented:○ Automated annotation and transcription○ Precedence discovery○ Plagiarism checking (copyright and patent laws)○ Mitigating legalese by
■ "legal language processing"
Application of AI: Legal Systems ● Fully automated arbitration for petty cases and
small claims ○ address backlog of cases in existing legal
system○ realize valid outcomes faster○ global context (bridge issues of jurisprudence)
● ISO Certified Legal Systems!○ Is a judiciary not to be held to international
standards?
Application of AI: Legal Systems ● Artificial immune systems
○ system wide AI■ Police■ Courtroom■ Statements compiled in legal language
Go to a court, put a coin in a jukebox, get a verdict!
Issues Due to AI ● Issues of jurespudence
○ AI like Google is spread all across the globe● Issues of credit assignment (who is responsible)
○ The code was written by umpteen people■ Open sourced and crowd sourced AI
● Issues of uncertainity○ The AI makes use of uncertainty to cope with
uncertainty■ Some output might not be desirable
Discussion● Enhancing curriculum
○ Coursework ■ Psychology, reasoning, intelligence, AI■ Rhetoric, persuasion, knowledge representation■ Computer literacy (coding)■ Communication & Systems Theories
○ Culture of Seminars and Colloquia ○ Collaboration
■ Scholar-Scholar vs Student-Teacher relationships
○ Assessment and Evaluation
Thank youContact:Sameer KhanCNCS, University of HyderabadGachi Bowli 500046
email: [email protected]