Arabidopsis RABA1 GTPases are involved in transport between the trans -Golgi network and the plasma...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
2 -
download
0
Transcript of Arabidopsis RABA1 GTPases are involved in transport between the trans -Golgi network and the plasma...
Arabidopsis RABA1 GTPases are involved in transportbetween the trans-Golgi network and the plasma membrane,and are required for salinity stress tolerance
Rin Asaoka1, Tomohiro Uemura1, Jun Ito2,†, Masaru Fujimoto1, Emi Ito1, Takashi Ueda1,3 and Akihiko Nakano1,2,*1Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033,
Japan,2Molecular Membrane Biology Laboratory, RIKEN Advanced Science Institute, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan, and3PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi, Saitama, 332-0012, Japan
Received 29 June 2012; revised 31 August 2012; accepted 10 September 2012; published online 23 November 2012.
*For correspondence (e-mail [email protected]).†Present address: Division of Cell Biology, Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.
SUMMARY
RAB GTPases are key regulators of membrane traffic. Among them, RAB11, a widely conserved sub-group,
has evolved in a unique way in plants; plant RAB11 members show notable diversity, whereas yeast and ani-
mals have only a few RAB11 members. Fifty-seven RAB GTPases are encoded in the Arabidopsis thaliana gen-
ome, 26 of which are classified in the RAB11 group (further divided into RABA1–RABA6 sub-groups).
Although several plant RAB11 members have been shown to play pivotal roles in plant-unique developmental
processes, including cytokinesis and tip growth, molecular and physiological functions of the majority of
RAB11 members remain unknown. To reveal precise functions of plant RAB11, we investigated the subcellular
localization and dynamics of the largest sub-group of Arabidopsis RAB11, RABA1, which has nine members.
RABA1 members reside on mobile punctate structures adjacent to the trans-Golgi network and co-localized
with VAMP721/722, R-SNARE proteins that operate in the secretory pathway. In addition, the constitutive-
active mutant of RABA1b, RABA1bQ72L , was present on the plasma membrane. The RABA1b -containing
membrane structures showed actin-dependent dynamic motion . Vesicles labeled by GFP–RABA1b moved
dynamically, forming queues along actin filaments. Interestingly, Arabidopsis plants whose four major RABA1
members were knocked out, and those expressing the dominant-negative mutant of RABA1B, exhibited
hypersensitivity to salinity stress. Altogether, these results indicate that RABA1 members mediate transport
between the trans-Golgi network and the plasma membrane, and are required for salinity stress tolerance.
Keywords: RABA1, Rab11, salinity stress, post-Golgi traffic, Arabidopsis thaliana, actin filaments.
INTRODUCTION
Membrane traffic is essential for a variety of cellular
phenomena from housekeeping to development, and is
coordinately regulated by elaborate molecular machiner-
ies. RAB GTPases, molecular switches that act through the
conformational change between the GTP- and GDP-bound
forms, control docking, fusion and, in some cases, fission
events during vesicle trafficking (Miserey-Lenkei et al.,
2010; Valente et al., 2010). The RAB family has a large
number of members: for example, 60 in Homo sapiens and
57 in Arabidopsis thaliana. In order to maintain proper traf-
fic, each RAB member is considered to regulate a specific
step in the complicated network of membrane traffic.
In plants, RAB members consist of eight groups: RABA,
RABB, RABC, RABD, RABE, RABF, RABG and RABH, which
correspond to animal RAB11, RAB2, RAB18, RAB1, RAB8,
RAB5, RAB7 and RAB6, respectively (Rutherford and Moore,
2002). Despite of the lack of several RAB groups conserved
in animals, some plant RAB proteins have undergone
unique diversification. In particular, the RABA (RAB11)
group exhibits remarkable expansion in higher plants. In
A. thaliana, the RABA group comprises as many as 26
members out of the total of 57 RABs. However, animals and
yeast possess only a few corresponding members. In non-
polarized mammalian cells, RAB11a localizes to the mem-
brane of recycling endosomes (Ullrich et al., 1996; Green
et al., 1997), and regulates transport from the sorting endo-
somes to the recycling compartments (Ullrich et al., 1996).
In polarized epithelial cells, RAB11a, RAB11b and RAB25
© 2012 The AuthorsThe Plant Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
240
The Plant Journal (2013) 73, 240–249 doi: 10.1111/tpj.12023
localize to the apical recycling endosomes (Casanova et al.,
1999). The RAB11 and RAB25 sub-classes appear to co-
localize but are suggested to control distinct transport
routes between the recycling endosome and the Golgi or
the plasma membrane (Casanova et al., 1999; Somsel Rod-
man and Wandinger-Ness, 2000). The RAB11 counterpart in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ypt31/32, has been implicated in
export from the late Golgi compartment to the pre-vacuo-
lar/endosomal compartment and the plasma membrane
(Benli et al., 1996; Segev, 2001; Ortiz et al., 2002).
In plants, the RABA group is further divided into six sub-
classes (RABA1–RABA6). Previous studies have shown
roles for RABA members in a wide range of cellular events.
NtRAB11b, a RABA1 member in Nicotiana tabacum, has
been shown to play a crucial role in pollen tube growth
(de Graaf et al., 2005). Arabidopsis RABA2 and RABA3,
which show high similarity to mammalian RAB11 and
yeast Ypt31/32, have been reported to localize on a novel
post-Golgi membrane domain, that partly overlaps with
the trans-Golgi network (TGN) in root tip cells. During cyto-
kinesis, RABA2 and RABA3 proteins localize precisely to
the growing margins of the cell plate, suggesting impor-
tant roles in cytokinesis via regulation of polarized secre-
tion (Chow et al., 2008). The involvement of RABA1a in
auxin signaling has also been reported (Koh et al., 2009).
Preuss et al. (2004, 2006) have shown that RABA4b func-
tions in polarized secretion in root hair cells, in cooperation
with its effector phosphatidylinositol 4-OH kinase beta 1
(PI-4Kb1). Szumlanski and Nielsen (2009) reported that
RABA4d is expressed in a pollen-specific manner and is
required for proper development of pollen tubes.
In A. thaliana, RABA1 is the largest sub-group of RABA,
with nine members (RABA1a–RABA1i). However, the physio-
logical roles of this sub-group remain unexploited. In this
study, we have focused on the RABA1 sub-group, particu-
larly RABA1a, RABA1b, RABA1c and RABA1d, whose expres-
sion is abundant in the whole plant body. We have shown
that these RABA1 proteins localize on a compartment adja-
cent to the TGN. Several lines of evidence further indicate
that RABA1 regulates transport between the TGN and the
plasma membrane. Moreover, we have found that RABA1
members redundantly function in salinity stress tolerance.
RESULTS
Expression patterns of RABA1 members
In A. thaliana, the RABA1 sub-group has nine members
(RABA1a–RABA1i). First, we compared the expression pro-
files of these members from the Arabidopsis Information
Resource database (http://www.arabidopsis.org/, Expression-
Set:1006710873), usingDART to access andorganize themicro-
array data (http://dandelion.liveholonics.com/dart/index.php).
RABA1a, RABA1b, RABA1c and RABA1d are abundant in
the whole plant body, whereas RABA1e is mainly
expressed in roots. The other four members (RABA1f,
RABA1g, RABA1h and RABA1i) are mainly expressed in
flowers (Figure S1). Next, we generated transgenic plants
expressing GFP/Venus-tagged RABA1a, RABA1b, RABA1c,
RABA1d, RABA1e and RABA1f proteins under the control of
their native regulatory elements and examined their expres-
sion patterns. RABA1a, RABA1b, RABA1c and RABA1d were
observed in all parts of the plant body, but their expression
patterns were slightly different. RABA1a, RABA1b and
RABA1c were abundant in the division zones of shoots and
roots. Expression of RABA1d was high in the stele and low
in other areas. RABA1e was detected only in roots (Fig-
ure 1a), especially in root hair cells (Figure 1b, arrowheads).
Consistent with the TAIR microarray data, RABA1f was
detected only in pollen tubes (Figure 1c). Thus, RABA1a,
RABA1b, RABA1c and RABA1d are major members of the
RABA1 sub-group that are expressed throughout all tissues,
although the TAIR data predicted modest expression of
RABA1f and RABA1g in vegetative parts as well (Figure S1).
Detailed observation of growing root hairs showed char-
acteristic accumulation of GFP–RABA1b, GFP–RABA1c and
GFP–RABA1e in the tip region of root hairs (Figures 1a and
2a). The pollen-specific member RABA1f also accumulated
in the tip region of growing pollen tubes (Figure 1a). The
amino acid sequence similarities among RABA1 proteins
are considerably high, approximately 70–80%. These
results imply that the five RABA1 (RABA1a, RABA1b,
RABA1c, RABA1d and RABA1e) members, and perhaps
other members as well, are involved in related transport
processes, even though they are expressed in different
tissues. In this report, we analyzed RABA1b as the repre-
sentative of the RABA1 sub-group, because it is the most
abundant in major tissues (Figure 1a).
Characterization of the RABA1b compartment
In all the cells we observed, RABA1b was localized on small
punctate structures of various size that show dynamic
motion (Figure 2a and Movie S1). In the division zone of
roots, many dot-like RABA1b-containing compartments
were seen in the cytoplasm, especially near the plasma
membrane (Figure 2a). In the differentiation zone, fluores-
cent signals near the plasma membrane were reduced, and
distinct signals appeared along lines (Figure 2a). These
aligned signals are the fluorescent trajectories of high-
speed movement of RABA1b-containing vesicles along the
actin cytoskeleton (see Figure 7). RABA1b also accumulated
on cell plates in dividing cells and in the tip region of grow-
ing root hair cells (Figure 2a, arrow). Similar localization
patterns were observed in cells expressing fluorescence-
tagged RABA1a and RABA1c (Figure 2b). Transgenic
plants co-expressing Venus–RABA1a and mRFP–RABA1b,
GFP–RABA1b and mRFP–RABA1b, and GFP–RABA1c and
mRFP–RABA1b revealed that each pair of proteins
co-localize in the division zone of roots (Figure 2b). The
© 2012 The AuthorsThe Plant Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2013), 73, 240–249
Analysis of RABA1 GTPases in A. thaliana 241
GFP–RABA1b and mRFP–RABA1b pair was used as a posi-
tive control of co-localization. We also performed quantita-
tive analysis of the co-localization using a macro written in
Metamorph software, which semi-automatically measures
the distance from the center of each RFP signal to the cen-
ter of the nearest GFP or Venus signal in acquired images
(Figure S4A) (Ito et al., 2012). GFP–RABA1d and GFP–
RABA1e were not detected in root tips, because their
expression is spatially restricted to the stele and root hair
cells, respectively. Hereafter, we refer to the compartment
labeled by GFP–RABA1b as the RABA1b compartment.
Next, the RABA1b compartment was tested for the pres-
ence of known organelle markers of post-Golgi traffic by
high-resolution confocal laser microscopy. As shown in
Figure 3(a–e), the RABA1 compartment showed partial
association with organelles labeled by mRFP-tagged
syntaxin of plants 43 (mRFP–SYP43, TGN marker) (Uemura
et al., 2004) and mRFP-tagged vacuolar proton ATPase
a1 (VHA-a1–mRFP, TGN marker) (Dettmer et al., 2006),
and less with sialyl transferase-fused mRFP (ST–mRFP,
Golgi marker) (Munro, 1995; Boevink et al., 1998), mRFP-
tagged arabidopsis rab GTPase homolog 7 (mRFP–ARA7,
endosome marker) (Ueda et al., 2001) or mRFP-tagged
arabidopsis rab GTPase homolog 6 (ARA6–mRFP, endo-
some marker) (Ueda et al., 2001). However, the co-localiza-
tion with VAMP721, R- soluble N-ethyl-maleimide sensitive
factor attachment protein receptor (R-SNARE), which is
another key regulator of membrane traffic, was remarkable
(Figure 3f). The comparison of the RABA1b compartment
with the TGN was interesting, because they seemed to be
frequently adjacent and sometimes associated (Figure 3a,b).
However, this association appeared to be not as tight and
stable as that of the Golgi and the TGN (Figure 3g). We
sometimes observed the RABA1b compartment adjacent
to the ARA6 compartment, but rarely adjacent to the ARA7
compartment. Quantitative analysis of the co-localization
clarified the tendency of the markers to co-localize with or
be adjacent to the RABA1b compartment (Figure S4B).
To characterize the RABA1b compartment in more detail,
we examined whether inhibitors of post-Golgi traffic affect
the RABA1b fluorescence pattern. Brefeldin A (BFA) inhibits
budding of vesicles and aggregates Golgi and post-
Golgi compartments, such as the TGN and endosomes
(Grebe et al., 2003; Dettmer et al., 2006). The RABA1b com-
partment also aggregated upon BFA treatment, although
some GFP–RABA1b signals remained on large bead-like
(a)
(b) (c)
Figure 1. Expression patterns of Arabidopsis
RABA1 members.
(a) Distribution patterns of RABA1 members.
Left, bright field. Right, fluorescence of GFP/
Venus-tagged RABA1s driven by their own
promoters. Venus–RABA1a, GFP–RABA1b, GFP
–RABA1c, GFP–RABA1d and GFP–RABA1e were
observed using a stereoscopic microscope.
Scale bars = 1 mm.
(b) Z-stack image of GFP–RABA1e in epidermal
cells with growing root hairs. Arrowheads indi-
cate root hair cells. Arrows indicate root hairs.
Fluorescence was not detected in non-root hair
cells. The image was obtained by confocal laser
microscopy. The distance between adjacent
Z-stack images was 0.58 m, and 100 planes are
stacked. Scale bar = 10 lm.
(c) Confocal image of Venus–RABA1f in grow-
ing pollen tubes. Scale bar = 10 lm.
© 2012 The AuthorsThe Plant Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2013), 73, 240–249
242 Rin Asaoka et al.
structures (Figure 4a, arrowheads, and Figure S5). Wort-
mannin, an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
(PI3K), exaggerates the different characteristics of the
RABA1b compartment and the TGN. Wortmannin caused
no morphological change to the TGN labeled by mRFP–
SYP43. However, GFP–RABA1b signals increased on the
plasma membrane upon wortmannin treatment, while dot-
like signals of GFP–RABA1b in the cytoplasm decreased
(Figure 4b and Figure S5). Treatment with dimethylsulfox-
ide (DMSO) had no effect on these compartments (Figure
S2). These results indicate that the RABA1b compartment
has a property that is different from the TGN represented
by SYP43, and that shows a tendency to associate with the
plasma membrane upon wortmannin treatment.
RABA1 members are involved in transport between the
TGN and the plasma membrane
VAMP721 and VAMP722 are R-SNARE proteins that
operate redundantly in the secretory pathway (Kwon et al.,
2008). Double staining of RABA1b and VAMP721 revealed
that the two proteins largely co-localize on punctate
structures (Figure 3f). Most mRFP–VAMP721 signals were
(a)
(b)
Figure 2. Subcellular localization of GFP–RABA1 members.
(a) Confocal images of GFP–RABA1b in actively dividing cells in the root tip,
differentiated cells in the root, and root hairs. Characteristic accumulation in
the cell plate (arrow) in the root tip was observed. Scale bars = 10 lm.
(b) Subcellular localization of Venus–RABA1a, GFP–RABA1b and GFP–RABA1c. The regions enclosed by white squares are magnified and shown
in the right column. Green, GFP/Venus- tagged RABA1 proteins; magenta,
mRFP–RABA1b. Scale bars = 10 lm.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
Figure 3. The RABA1b compartment associates with the TGN.
(a–f) Co-expression of GFP–RABA1b and mRFP-tagged organelle markers:
mRFP–SYP43, VHA-a1–mRFP, ST–mRFP, mRFP–ARA7, ARA6–mRFP and
mRFP–VAMP721 in root tip cells. Green, GFP–RABA1b; magenta, mRFP-
tagged markers. The regions enclosed by white squares are magnified and
shown in the right column. Scale bars = 10 lm.
(g) Co-expression of GFP–RABA1b, ST-Venus and mRFP–SYP43 in root tip
cells. The region enclosed by a white square is magnified and shown in the
bottom panels. Scale bar = 10 lm.
© 2012 The AuthorsThe Plant Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2013), 73, 240–249
Analysis of RABA1 GTPases in A. thaliana 243
accompanied by GFP–RABA1b, but some GFP–RABA1b
signals were not associated with mRFP–VAMP721. GFP–
RABA1b also co-localized with mRFP–VAMP722 (Figure
S2). mRFP–VAMP722 showed similar responses to GFP–
RABA1b upon treatment with wortmannin and BFA. Thus
the RABA1b compartment appeared to be closely related
to the compartment to which VAMP721 and VAMP722
localize, suggesting a role for RABA1b in transport toward
the plasma membrane.
To examine the involvement of RABA1b in transport
between the TGN and the plasma membrane, we gener-
ated transgenic plants expressing a mutant form of
RABA1b, either GTP-fixed (GFP–RABA1bQ72L) or GDP-fixed
(GFP–RABA1bS27N). GTP-fixed RAB GTPases are constitu-
tively active, and are thought to accumulate on the target
membrane. However, GDP-fixed RAB GTPases act in a
dominant-negative way by trapping the guanine nucleotide
exchange factor (Burstein et al., 1992; Olkkonen and
Stenmark, 1997; Feig, 1999). Significant localization of GFP–
RABA1bQ72L to the plasma membrane was observed in
root tip cells (Figure 5a, upper panel, arrowhead, and
Figure S6) in addition to the punctate structures (arrow).
Such relocation was not evident in differentiated cells
(Figure 5a, lower panel). The punctate structures of GFP–
RABA1bQ72L co-localized with mRFP–VAMP721 almost
completely (Figure 5d and Figure S7), and also overlapped
well with the TGN labeled by mRFP–SYP43 and VHA-a1–
mRFP (Figure 5b,c and Figure S7). RABA1bQ72L showed
increased cytosolic labeling compared to the wild-type. In
contrast to RABA1bQ72L, GFP–RABA1bS27N was localized to
(a)
(b)
Figure 4. Effects of BFA and wortmannin on the RABA1b compartment.
(a) Root tip cells expressing GFP–RABA1b and mRFP–SYP43 (above) or
mRFP–VAMP722 (below) treated with 50 lM brefeldin A for 1 h. Green, GFP
–RABA1b; magenta, mRFP-tagged markers. Arrowheads indicate large
bead-like structures that remain separate from aggregates. Scale
bar = 10 lm.
(b) Root tip cells expressing GFP–RABA1b and mRFP–SYP43 (above) or
mRFP–VAMP722 (below) treated with 33 lM wortmannin for 1 h. Green,
GFP–RABA1b; magenta, mRFP-tagged markers. Scale bar = 10 lm.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Figure 5. RABA1b mediates transport between the TGN and the plasma
membrane.
(a) Subcellular localization of GFP–RABA1b (WT), GFP–RABA1bQ72L (QL) and
GFP–RABA1bS27N (SN) in root tip cells (above) and root differentiated cells
(below). The arrow indicates a dot-like signal for GFP–RABA1bQ72L and the
arrowhead indicates the signal for GFP–RABA1bQ72L on the plasmamembrane.
(b–e) Co-expression of GFP–RABA1bQ72L or GFP–RABA1bS27N and mRFP-
tagged markers in root tip cells. The regions enclosed by white squares are
magnified and shown in the right column. Scale bars = 10 lm.
© 2012 The AuthorsThe Plant Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2013), 73, 240–249
244 Rin Asaoka et al.
larger punctate structures (Figure 5a and Figure S6). These
structures co-localized well with ARA6–mRFP (Figure 5e and
Figure S7), suggesting recolation of RABA1bS27N to multi-
vesicular endosomes (Ebine et al., 2011). Interestingly, the
size of the ARA6–mRFP compartments appeared larger than
in the control (Figure 3e) when co-expressed with GFP
–RABA1bS27N.
The co-localization of RABA1b and VAMP721/722 and the
localization of GFP–RABA1bQ72L on the plasma membrane
support the idea that RABA1b may function in transport
from the TGN to the plasma membrane. To test whether
RABA1b plays any role in endocytosis, we examined the
effect of GFP–RABA1bQ72L or GFP–RABA1bS27N expression
on the uptake of FM4-64, a lipophilic dye used to trace endo-
cytosis. As shown in Figure 6, no significant difference was
observed in the kinetics of FM4-64 internalization.
Dynamic motion of RABA1b vesicles is actin-dependent
As shown in Figure 2, which was taken with a long
exposure time (1 sec), localization of GFP–RABA1b
appeared to occur along distinct lines. To increase the time
resolution, we applied variable incidence angle fluorescent
microscopy (VIAFM), a technique that is related to total
internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM), which
has a high signal-to-noise ratio and can take pictures at 10
frames per sec. High-speed movies clearly showed that
these aligned signals were the fluorescent trajectories of
GFP–RABA1b-containing vesicles moving along filamen-
tous structures (Movie S2). To reveal the nature of these
structures, we studied transgenic plants co-expressing Life-
act–Venus (actin marker, Era et al., 2009) and GFP–
RABA1b. The results indicated that vesicles labeled by GFP
–RABA1b form queues along actin filaments (Figure 7a).
Such aligned signals were dispersed when actin filaments
were depolymerized by latrunculin B. No apparent change
was observed in response to treatment with oryzalin, a
microtubule-depolymerization agent (Figure 7b and Movie
S3). Thus the dynamic motion of RABA1b vesicles is
actin-dependent.
RABA1 members function in salinity stress tolerance
All pieces of evidence obtained so far suggest that the
major function of RABA1b is in the secretory pathway, at
the transport step from the TGN to the plasma membrane.
Figure 6. RABA1b mutants do not affect endo-
cytosis.
Endocytosis in wild-type cells (Control) and
transgenic cells expressing GFP–RABA1b, GFP–RABA1bQ72L or GFP–RABA1bS27N was visualized
using FM4-64. Images were captured at 10, 30,
60, 90, 120 and 180 min after staining. Scale
bar = 10 lm.
(a)
(b)
Figure 7. Dynamic motion of the RABA1b compartment is actin-dependent.
(a) Co-expression of GFP–RABA1b (green) and Lifeact–Venus (magenta) in
root differentiated cells. Scale bar = 10 lm.
(b) Root differentiated cells expressing GFP–RABA1b treated with 2 lM la-
trunculin B (upper) or 10 lM oryzalin (lower) for 3 h. Scale bar = 10 lm.
© 2012 The AuthorsThe Plant Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2013), 73, 240–249
Analysis of RABA1 GTPases in A. thaliana 245
To further understand possible physiological roles of
RABA1 members, we obtained four T-DNA-inserted mutant
lines, which were completely knocked out for expression
of RABA1A, RABA1B, RABA1C and RABA1D (Figure 8a).
Single mutants showed no macroscopically abnormal
phenotypes. We therefore constructed multiple mutated
plants by cross-pollination. The quadruple mutant raba1a
raba1b raba1c raba1d exhibited only a marginal phenotype
under ordinary growth conditions, with slightly shorter
roots than the wild-type (Figure 8b,c). Transgenic plants
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d) (e)
Figure 8. RABA1 members are required for salinity stress tolerance.
(a) Schematic structures of RABA1 genes and the positions of T-DNA insertions.
(b) Expression of RABA1 genes was not detected in the quadruple mutant by RT-PCR.
(c) Phenotypes of the RABA1 quadruple mutant under normal growth and salinity stress conditions. Plants were grown for 14 days. Scale bar = 1 cm.
(d) Phenotypes of transgenic plants expressing dominant-negative or constitutive-active mutant proteins under normal growth and salinity stress conditions.
Plants were grown for 14 days. Scale bar = 1 cm.
(e) Relative fresh weight of wild-type and mutant plants. Values are means ± standard errors normalized to the mean fresh weight of wild-type plants under
each condition.
© 2012 The AuthorsThe Plant Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2013), 73, 240–249
246 Rin Asaoka et al.
expressing the dominant-negative RABA1bS27N mutant
showed a more prominent growth defect than the
quadruple mutant (Figure 8d), suggesting that other RABA1
members support loss of RABA1a–RABA1d but are domi-
nantly impaired by expression of RABA1bS27N. Next, we
focused on stress tolerance and investigated the
phenotypes of the quadruple mutants and the plants
expressing RABA1bS27N under biotic or abiotic stress. We
found that these plants exhibited prominent phenotypes
when subjected to salinity stress. Interestingly, the quadru-
ple mutant showed a very severe growth defect under salin-
ity stress conditions (Figure 8c). On one-tenth strength MS
medium containing 15 mM NaCl, the majority of the quadru-
ple mutants died during the cotyledon stage (Figure 8c). The
fresh weights of the quadruple mutant were fivefold lower
than those of the wild-type plants on average (Figure 8e).
This salt hypersensitivity of the quadruple mutant was
complemented by Venus–RABA1a, GFP–RABA1b or GFP–
RABA1c (Figure 8c). The plants expressing RABA1bS27N
were also hypersensitive to salinity stress (Figure 8d,e). Nei-
ther the quadruple knockout mutation nor expression of
RABA1bS27N affected growth sensitivity to 30 mM sorbitol
(Figure S3), indicating that the hypersensitivity was not due
to high osmolarity but to the high salt concentration. Taken
together, these results show that at least four members of
the RABA1 group, RABA1a, RABA1b, RABA1c and RABA1d,
act redundantly in tolerance to salinity stress.
DISCUSSION
Characteristics of the RABA1 compartment
In this study, we analyzed the subcellular localization of
RABA1b as a representative of the RABA1 group, and show
that its compartment overlaps with the TGN or lies in its
vicinity. The RABA1b compartment shows dynamic motion
in an actin-dependent fashion. Members of other RABA
sub-groups, RABA2 and RABA3, have been reported to
partially co-localize with structures labeled by VHA-a1–GFP
and FM4-64, but not with the Golgi apparatus or the
pre-vacuolar compartment labeled by ST–GFP and GFP–
BP-80 (Chow et al., 2008). The authors concluded that the
RABA2/3 compartment is an early endosomal TGN-associ-
ated membrane domain. In a collaborative study, Feraru
et al. (2012) showed that RABA1b and RABA2a co-localize.
Whether these sub-classes of RABA share membrane
traffic events around the TGN remains to be pursued.
RABA1b regulates the transport between the TGN
and the plasma membrane
RAB GTPases generally act as molecular switches through
conformational change between GTP- and GDP-bound
forms in order to control docking and fusion events. GTP-
bound Rab GTPases are considered to localize on the target
organelle (Chavrier and Goud, 1999). The fact that GTP-
fixed RABA1b largely localized to the plasma membrane is
likely to reflect the function of the RABA1b, suggesting a
role in the exocytic event. Dettmer et al. (2006) indicates
that the TGN functions as the early endosome in the endo-
cytic pathway. However, neither the GTP-fixed nor the
GDP-fixed mutant of RABA1b affected endocytosis of the
FM4-64 dye. A similar result was obtained in an indepen-
dent study on epidermal leaf cells of Nicotiana benthami-
ana (S. Choi, Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate
School of Science, The University of Tokyo, T. Tamaki,
Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of
Science, The University of Tokyo,
K. Ebine, Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate
School of Science, The University of Tokyo, T. Uemura, T.
Ueda and A. Nakano, unpublished results). A similar con-
clusion was also drawn on the basis of another indepen-
dent study on recycling of PIN proteins (Feraru et al., 2012).
Thus, we suggest that RABA1b, and probably other RABA1
members as well, act on the transport process from the
TGN-associated compartment to the plasma membrane.
We also observed that RABA1b shows partial associa-
tion with ARA6, which is more evident when RABA1b is
locked in the GDP form. ARA6 is a plant-unique RAB5
member that mediates transport from the multi-vesicular
endosomes to the plasma membrane (Ebine et al., 2011).
Expression of the RABA1b GDP mutant increased the size
of ARA6 endosomes. These results may provide an
indication of the molecular mechanisms of the complicated
post-Golgi traffic system in plants.
Evolution of RABA1 members – redundancy and diversity
Here, we have demonstrated that RABA1 members
function redundantly. It is also possible that some mem-
bers of other RABA sub-groups share part of functions
with RABA1. Many members of the RABA family show
similar localization patterns, especially in relation to the
TGN. Furthermore, RABA4b actively accumulates in the tip
region of root hairs (Preuss et al., 2004), as for RABA1b
and RABA1e (Figures 1a and 2a). RABA4d, which has a
crucial role in the formation of pollen tubes (Szumlanski
and Nielsen, 2009), accumulates in the tip of pollen tubes,
as does RABA1f (Figure 1c). On the other hand, some
RABA members have been implicated in endocytic events,
unlike RABA1b (our unpublished results). Further extensive
analysis is necessary to understand the whole spectrum of
the RABA GTPase functions, which have shown multiplica-
tion and diversification during evolution.
Analysis of the quadruple raba1a raba1b raba1c raba1d
mutant has revealed that RABA1a–d proteins are required
for tolerance to salinity stress. This implies that these
RABA1 proteins regulate the localization of cell-surface
proteins, such as pumps and channels. The fact that
the GDP-fixed mutant of RABA1b causes even more severe
salt sensitivity indicates that other members of the RABA1
© 2012 The AuthorsThe Plant Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2013), 73, 240–249
Analysis of RABA1 GTPases in A. thaliana 247
sub-family are also involved. For land plants, it is impera-
tive to adapt quickly and flexibly to a change in environ-
ment. The expansion and diversification of RABA
members may be advantageous to sense the emergence of
stress and respond to it. Determination of the cargo trans-
ported by RABA1 members and regulators of RABA1 is a
very important subject for future studies.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Plant materials and growth conditions
T-DNA insertion lines were derived from the Col-0 accession of A.thaliana. Both lines were backcrossed three times into the Col-0accession. Seeds for raba1a (SALK77747), raba1c (SALK145363)and raba1d (SALK88879) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Bio-logical Resource Center. Seeds for raba1b (SAIL875F08) wereobtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre.
Arabidopsis seeds were sterilized and planted on 0.3% agarplates containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium, 1%w/v sucrose and vitamins (pH 5.7). Plants were grown in a climatechamber at 23°C under the continuous light.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from rosette leaves of 10-day-old wild-type and mutant plants using RNAqueous-4PCR (Life Technologies,http://www.lifetechnologies.com/), and cDNA was synthesizedusing SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies).PCR conditions were as follows: 95°C for 2 min, then 30 cycles of95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 1 min, then 72°C for5 min.
Plasmids and transformation of plants
By fluorescent tagging of full-length proteins (Tian et al., 2004),fragments of each gene, including cDNA encoding GFP, Venus ormRFP in front of the start codon of each gene, were generated.The RABA1A fragment contains 3.3 kb of 5′ and 1.1 kb of 3′ flank-ing sequences. The RABA1B fragment contains 1.7 kb of 5′ and 1.0kb of 3′ flanking sequences. The RABA1C fragment contains 1.9 kbof 5′ and 1.2 kb of 3′ flanking sequences. The RABA1D fragmentcontains 3.2 kb of 5′ and 0.9 kb of 3′ flanking sequences. TheRABA1E fragment contains 2.4 kb of 5′ and 0.7 kb of 3′ flankingsequences. The RABA1F fragment contains 1.6 kb of 5′ and 0.8 kbof 3′ flanking sequences. Amplified chimeric fragments were sub-cloned into the binary vector pGWB1, a kind gift from Dr. T. Naka-gawa (Center for Integrated Research in Science, Shimane Univer-sity, Japan), which were used for transforming Arabidopsisplants. Transformation of Arabidopsis plants was performed byfloral dipping (Clough and Bent, 1998) using Agrobacterium tum-efaciens strain GV3101::pMP90.
Microscopy
Plants expressing GFP-, Venus- or mRFP-tagged proteins wereobserved under an LSM710 confocal microscope equipped with aMETA device (Carl Zeiss, http://corporate.zeiss.com/) for multi-color observations, and an Olympus (http://www.olympus-global.com/) BX51 microscope equipped with a confocal scanner unit(model CSU10; Yokogawa Electric, http://www.yokogawa.com/)for single-color observations, with a cooled CCD camera (modelORCA-AG; Hamamatsu Photonics, http://www.hamamatsu.com/index.html). The co-localization analysis was performed as
described previously (Ito et al., 2012). Images were captured usingan LSM710 confocal microscope with oil immersion lens (9 63,numerical aperture = 1.40). The line scan analysis was performedusing Metamorph software (Molecular Devices, http://www.mole-culardevices.com/).
Roots of plants after 5 days of culture were observed. Forobservation of root hairs, seeds were germinated on thin agarmedium (compositionally the same as described above) in aglass-bottomed dish and observed without any preparation after10 days of culture.
Variable incidence angle fluorescent microscopy
Roots of transgenic A. thaliana seedlings were placed on glassslides (76 9 26 mm; Matsunami, http://www.matsunami-glass.co.jp/), covered with a 0.12–0.17 mm thick cover slip (24 9 60 mm;Matsunami), and root epidermal cells were observed under a fluo-rescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse TE2000-E and a CFI ApoTIRF 9 100 H/1.49 numerical aperture objective, http://www.nikon.com/) equipped with a Nikon TIRF2 system. GFP was excited usingan 488 nm laser. All images were acquired using an Andor iXo-nEM electron multiplying charge coupled device (EMCCD) camera(http://www.andor.com/).
Chemical treatments
To visualize the process of endocytosis, seedlings were mountedin half-strength MS liquid with 16.5 lM FM4-64 (Invitrogen/Molec-ular Probes; T13320; diluted from a 16.5 mM stock in water) on ice,then washed out and incubated at 23°C. For BFA treatment, seed-lings were incubated in half-strength MS liquid containing 50 lMBFA diluted from a 50 mM stock in DMSO, and then mounted onthe slides in the presence of BFA. Wortmannin was used at 33 lMdiluted from a 10 mM stock in DMSO, and the treatment wasperformed in a similar way as BFA treatment. Latrunculin B andoryzalin treatments were also performed in similar ways. Controltreatment was performed with DMSO in place of each chemical.
Salinity stress assay
The salinity stress assay was performed as described by Krebset al. (2010). Surface-sterilized seeds were sown on 1% agar platescontaining one-tenth strength MS medium, 0.5% w/v sucrose and10 mM MES/KOH (pH5.8) with or without 15 mM sodium chlorideor 30 mM sorbitol (as an osmotic control). Fresh weight was mea-sured after 14 days of culture.
ACCESSION NUMBERS
The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative locus identifiers for the
genes referred to in this paper are At1g06400 (RABA1A),
At1g16920 (RABA1B), At5g45750 (RABA1C), At4g18800
(RABA1D), At4g18430 (RABA1E), At5g60860 (RABA1F),
At3g15060 (RABA1G), At2g33870 (RABA1H), and At1g28550
(RABA1I).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center and Notting-ham Arabidopsis Stock Centre for providing T-DNA insertionmutants of Arabidopsis. We also thank T. Nakagawa (Center forIntegrated Research in Science, Shimane University, Japan) andM. Sato (Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto Prefectural Univer-sity, Japan) for sharing materials, N. Tsutsumi (Graduate Schoolof Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Japan) for
© 2012 The AuthorsThe Plant Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2013), 73, 240–249
248 Rin Asaoka et al.
variable incidence angle fluorescent microscopy and K. Ebine(National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan) forvaluable advice. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid forSpecially Promoted Research from the Ministry of Education,Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and by fundsfrom the Extreme Photonics and Cellular Systems Biology Pro-jects of RIKEN. R.A. is the recipient of a Research Fellowship forYoung Scientists from the Japan Society for the Promotion ofScience.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online ver-sion of this article.Figure S1. Expression patterns of RABA1 members from theonline microarray data.
Figure S2. Control treatment with DMSO.
Figure S3. Osmotic stress assay as a control.
Figure S4. Quantitative analysis of the co-localization betweenRABA1b and other RABA1 members or organelle markers.
Figure S5. Line scan analysis of GFP–RABA1b, mRFP–SYP43 andmRFP–VAMP722 after BFA or wortmannin treatment.
Figure S6. Line scan analysis of GFP–RABA1b, GFP–RABA1bQ72L
and GFP–RABA1bS27N.
Figure S7. Line scan analysis of GFP–RABA1b, GFP–RABA1bQ72L,GFP–RABA1bS27N and mRFP-tagged organelle markers.
Movie S1. GFP–RABA1b-containing compartments in differen-tiated cells of roots observed by confocal microscopy.
Movie S2. GFP–RABA1b-containing compartments in root differ-entiated cells by variable incidence angle fluorescent microscopy.
Movie S3. RABA1 compartments treated with 2 lM latrunculin B or10 lM oryzalin.
REFERENCES
Benli, M., Doring, F., Robinson, D.G., Yang, X. and Gallwitz, D. (1996) Two
GTPase isoforms, Ypt31p and Ypt32p, are essential for Golgi function in
yeast. EMBO J. 15, 6460–6475.Boevink, P., Oparka, K., Santa Cruz, S., Martin, B., Betteridge, A. and
Hawes, C. (1998) Stacks on tracks: the plant Golgi apparatus traffics on
an actin/ER network. Plant J. 15, 441–447.Burstein, E.S., Brondyk, W.H. and Macara, I.G. (1992) Amino acid resi-
dues in the Ras-like GTPase Rab3A that specify sensitivity to factors
that regulate the GTP/GDP cycling of Rab3A. J. Biol. Chem. 267,
22715–22718.Casanova, J.E., Wang, X., Kumar, R., Bhartur, S.G., Navarre, J., Woodrum,
J.E., Altschuler, Y., Ray, G.S. and Goldenring, J.R. (1999) Association of
Rab25 and Rab11a with the apical recycling system of polarized Madin–Darby canine kidney cells. Mol. Biol. Cell, 10, 47–61.
Chavrier, P., Goud, B. (1999) The role of ARF and Rab GTPases in
membrane transport. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 466–175.Chow, C.M., Neto, H., Foucart, C. and Moore, I. (2008) Rab-A2 and Rab-A3
GTPases define a trans-Golgi endosomal membrane domain in
Arabidopsis that contributes substantially to the cell plate. Plant Cell, 20,
101–123.Clough, S.J. and Bent, A.F. (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agro-
bacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16,
735–743.Dettmer, J., Hong-Hermesdorf, A., Stierhof, Y.D. and Schumacher, K. (2006)
Vacuolar H+-ATPase activity is required for endocytic and secretory
trafficking in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 18, 715–730.Ebine, K., Fujimoto, M., Okatani, Y. et al. (2011) A membrane trafficking
pathway regulated by the plant-specific RAB GTPase ARA6. Nat. Cell
Biol. 13, 853–859.
Era, A., Tominaga, M., Ebine, K., Awai, C., Saito, C., Ishizaki, K., Yamato, K.
T., Kohchi, T., Nakano, A. and Ueda, T. (2009) Application of Lifeact
reveals F–actin dynamics in Arabidopsis thaliana and the liverwort,
Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Cell Physiol. 50, 1041–1048.Feig, L.A. (1999) Tools of the trade: use of dominant-inhibitory mutants of
Ras-family GTPases. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, E25–E27.Feraru, E., Feraru, M.I., Asaoka, R., Paciorek, T., De Rycke, R., Tanaka, H.,
Nakano, A. and Friml, J. (2012) BEX5/RabA1b regulates trans-Golgi
network-to-plasma membrane protein trafficking in Arabidopsis. Plant
Cell, 24, 3074–3086.de Graaf, B.H., Cheung, A.Y., Andreyeva, T., Levasseur, K., Kieliszewski, M. and
Wu, H.M. (2005) Rab11 GTPase-regulated membrane trafficking is crucial for
tip-focused pollen tube growth in tobacco. Plant Cell, 17, 2564–2579.Grebe, M., Xu, J., Mobius, W., Ueda, T., Nakano, A., Geuze, H.J., Rook, M.B. and
Scheres, B. (2003) Arabidopsis sterol endocytosis involves actin-mediated
trafficking via ARA6-positive early endosomes. Curr. Biol. 13, 1378–1387.Green, E.G., Ramm, E., Riley, N.M., Spiro, D.J., Goldenring, J.R. and Wessling-
Resnick, M. (1997) Rab11 is associated with transferrin-containing recycling
compartments in K562 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 239, 612–616.Ito, E., Fujimoto, M., Ebine, K., Uemura, T., Ueda, T. and Nakano, A. (2012)
Dynamic behavior of clathrin in Arabidopsis thaliana unveiled by live
imaging. Plant J. 69, 204–216.Koh, E.J., Kwon, Y.R., Kim, K.I., Hong, S.W. and Lee, H. (2009) Altered ARA2
(RABA1a) expression in Arabidopsis reveals the involvement of a Rab/YPT
family member in auxin-mediated responses. Plant Mol. Biol. 70, 113–122.Krebs, M., Beyhl, D., Gorlich, E., Al-Rasheid, K.A., Marten, I., Stierhof, Y.D.,
Hedrich, R. and Schumacher, K. (2010) Arabidopsis V-ATPase activity at
the tonoplast is required for efficient nutrient storage but not for sodium
accumulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 3251–3256.Kwon, C., Neu, C., Pajonk, S. et al. (2008) Co-option of a default secretory
pathway for plant immune responses. Nature, 451, 835–840.Miserey-Lenkei, S., Chalancon, G., Bardin, S., Formstecher, E., Goud, B. and
Echard, A. (2010) Rab and actomyosin-dependent fission of transport
vesicles at the Golgi complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 645–654.Munro, S. (1995) An investigation of the role of transmembrane domains in
Golgi protein retention. EMBO J. 14, 4695–4704.Olkkonen, V.M. and Stenmark, H. (1997) Role of Rab GTPases in membrane
traffic. Int. Rev. Cytol. 176, 1–85.Ortiz, D., Medkova, M., Walch-Solimena, C. and Novick, P. (2002) Ypt32
recruits the Sec4p guanine nucleotide exchange factor, Sec2p, to secretory
vesicles; evidence for a Rab cascade in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 157, 1005–1015.Preuss, M.L., Serna, J., Falbel, T.G., Bednarek, S.Y. and Nielsen, E. (2004)
The Arabidopsis Rab GTPase RabA4b localizes to the tips of growing
root hair cells. Plant Cell, 16, 1589–1603.Preuss, M.L., Schmitz, A.J., Thole, J.M., Bonner, H.K., Otegui, M.S. and Nielsen,
E. (2006) A role for the RabA4b effector protein PI-4Kb1 in polarized expan-
sion of root hair cells in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Cell Biol. 172, 991–998.Rutherford, S. and Moore, I. (2002) The Arabidopsis Rab GTPase family:
another enigma variation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5, 518–528.Segev, N. (2001) Cell biology. A TIP about Rabs. Science, 292, 1313–1314.Somsel Rodman, J. and Wandinger-Ness, A. (2000) Rab GTPases coordinate
endocytosis. J. Cell Sci. 113, 183–192.Szumlanski, A.L. and Nielsen, E. (2009) The Rab GTPase RabA4d regulates
pollen tube tip growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell, 21, 526–544.Tian, G.W., Mohanty, A., Chary, S.N. et al. (2004) High-throughput fluores-
cent tagging of full-length Arabidopsis gene products in planta. Plant
Physiol. 135, 25–38.Ueda, T., Yamaguchi, M., Uchimiya, H. and Nakano, A. (2001) Ara6, a plant-
unique novel type Rab GTPase, functions in the endocytic pathway of
Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO J. 20, 4730–4741.Uemura, T., Ueda, T., Ohniwa, R.L., Nakano, A., Takeyasu, K. and Sato, M.H.
(2004) Systematic analysis of SNARE molecules in Arabidopsis: dissection
of the post-Golgi network in plant cells. Cell Struct. Funct. 29, 49–65.Ullrich, O., Reinsch, S., Urbe, S., Zerial, M. and Parton, R.G. (1996) Rab11
regulates recycling through the pericentriolar recycling endosome.
J. Cell Biol. 135, 913–924.Valente, C., Polishchuk, R. and De Matteis, M.A. (2010) Rab6 and myosin II
at the cutting edge of membrane fission. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 635–638.
© 2012 The AuthorsThe Plant Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2013), 73, 240–249
Analysis of RABA1 GTPases in A. thaliana 249