APPENDIX D - EIS

APPENDIX D: List of Registered Stakeholders and Interested & Affected Parties (I&APs) for EPL 7008

Environmental Scoping Assessment for the Proposed Exploration of Dimension Stone on Exclusive Prospecting License (EPL) 7008 near Karibib, Erongo Region

Proponent: Naris Mineral Resources

Organisation Contact person Department/Position/Capacit

y

Tel. No. / Mobile

No.

Email address

ESA

Pro

jec

t Te

am

cc

Omavi Geotechnical & Geo-

Environmental Consultants

Fredrika Shagama Environmental Assessment

Practitioner & Hydrogeologist

081-826 4867 /

081-407 5536

[email protected]

Ce

ntr

al G

ov

ern

me

nt

Ministry of Environment, Forestry and

Tourism

Mr. Teofilus Nghitila Executive Director 061-284-2184/5 [email protected]

Mr. Timoteus Mufeti Environmental Commissioner 061-284 2701 [email protected]

Ms. Saima Angula Deputy Director:

Environmental Assessment,

Waste Management, Pollution

Control and Inspections

061-284 2717 [email protected]

Mr. Hiskia Mbura Directorate of Environmental

Assessment


Mr. Damian Nchindo Directorate of Environmental

Assessment


Mr. Joseph Hailwa Director: Forestry

[email protected]

Ministry of Works & Transport Mrs Esther Kaapanda Executive Director 061-208-

8822/1/31

[email protected]

Ms. Charleen Benade Secretary to the Executive

Director

061-208 8822/31 [email protected]

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]










y

Tel. No. / Mobile

No.

Email address

Ministry of Agriculture, Water &

Land Reform

Mr. Percy Misika Executive Director 061-2087649 [email protected]

Mr. Malakia Ilungu Programme Mananger:

Communal Land

[email protected]

Ms. Maria Amakali Director: Water Resources

Management

[email protected]

Ministry of Mines & Energy Mr. Simeon Negumbo Executive Director 061-2848312/219 [email protected]

Erasmus Shivolo Mining Commissioner 061- [email protected]

Ministry of Urban and Rural

Development

Mr. Nghidinua Daniel Executive Director 061-297-5180 [email protected] /

[email protected] Ms. Bernice Van Wyk PA to Executove Director

[email protected]

Ms. R. Ruben Secretary to the Executive

Director

[email protected]

Ministry of Labour, Industrial

Relation and Employment Creation

Mr. Bro-Matthew Shinguadja Executive Director 061-206 6324 [email protected]

a

Re

gio

na

l G

RN

Erongo Regional Council Hon. Neville Adre Govenor 064-417900 [email protected]

Ms Ludmilla H Doeses Chief Regional Officer 064-4105700 [email protected]

Mr Meroro Deputy Director: Planning 081-1244966 [email protected] /

[email protected] Ms Dimari Van Rensburg Town and Regional Planner

[email protected]

Karibib Constituency Office Hon.Melanie Ndjago Constituency Councillor 064-550 346 /

081-240 3917

[email protected]














y

Tel. No. / Mobile

No.

Email address

Ms. Katrina Shikongo Chief Administration Officer 064-550 346/ 081-

2690519

[email protected] /

[email protected]

Loc

al G

RN

Karibib Town Council Mr. Lesley Goreseb Chief Executive Officer 064-550032/ 016 [email protected] /

[email protected]

Pre

-id

en

tifie

d S

tate

-Ow

ne

d a

nd

No

n-G

ov

ern

me

nta

l O

rga

nis

atio

ns Namwater Mr. Abraham Nehemia Chief Executive Officer 061-710000 [email protected]

Mr. Johannes K Shigwedha Corporate Communications

manager

061-71 2277/ 081

122 2858

[email protected]

Mr. Fillemon Aupokolo Environmentalist 061-712095 [email protected]

Roads Authority Mr. Jacky Mukuka Road Network Planning

[email protected]

Mr. Eugene de Paauw Network and Planning

Consultation

061-2847027/

081-1241947

[email protected]

Mr. Elia Lumbu

081-1465323 [email protected]

Epangelo Mining Mr. Naftal Hamata Mineral Resources

Department


Mr. Phillip Pendukeni Mineral Resources Extraction 061-415700 [email protected]

National Heritage Council of

Namibia

Mrs. Erica Ndalikokule Head: Heritage Management 061-301 903 [email protected]

Mr. Manfred Gaeb Regional Heritage Officer 061-301 903 [email protected] / rho1@nhc-

nam.org /[email protected] /

[email protected]

Namibia Chamber of Mines Mr. Veston Malango Chief Executive Officer 061-237925 [email protected]

TransNamib

Erongo Transportstion Head

Ms. Venessa Stein

061-2022013

Karibib Farmers Association (NGO) Mr. Cash Van Wyk Chairman 081-1241521 [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]/

mailto:[email protected]/















y

Tel. No. / Mobile

No.

Email address

Karibib Farmers Association (NGO) Mrs Doris Gladis Secretary 081-1272180 [email protected]

Namibia Botanical Gardens CC Mr. Frank Lohnert


Re

gis

tere

d

I&A

Ps

(Affe

cte

d

Pro

pe

rty

Ow

ne

rs/O

cc

up

iers

of La

nd

an

d N

eig

hb

ou

rs) Farm Habis 71 H H & P A Schneider (operated

under Farm Habis cc)

Owner 064-462 026 or

061-228 909

[email protected]

Portion 1 of Farm Habis 71 Herbert Heinrich & Dr Peter Adolf

Schneider

Owner 081-124 6165 [email protected]

Interested & Affected Party Ms. Bianca Foelscher Community Activist: Karibib 064-550 109

Interested & Affected Party Ms. Coleen Mannheimer Botanist 061-233 614 /

081-127 2820

[email protected]






BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT (BID)

Environmental Scoping Assessment (ESA) for

the Proposed Exploration Activities of

Dimension Stone on Exclusive Prospecting

License (EPL) 7008 in the Erongo Region,

Namibia

Proponent: Naris Mineral Resources cc

Prepared by: Omavi Geotechnical & Geo-

Environmental Consultants CC (The

Environmental Assessment Practitioner)

Email: [email protected]

Tel.: +264 81 826 4867

Date: 10 September 2020


Naris Mineral Resources cc ESA: EPL 7008

Page 1 of 13

1 INTRODUCTION

Naris Mineral Resources cc (hereinafter referred to as Naris Mineral Resources or the

Proponent), a 100% Namibian-owned company proposes to undertake exploration

on the Exclusive Prospecting License (EPL) 7008 in the Erongo Region. The EPL is

owned by the Proponent and the commodities that can be found on the EPL are

dimension stone. The geology of the EPL is characterized by two Formations, namely

the Karibib (lithology: marble, schists; ortho-amphibolite and quartzite) and Namibian

(lithology: diorite). The commodity targeted by the exploration activities on the EPL is

the dimension stone (quartzite and possibly marble). It should be noted that no

mining activities are planned for nor will be part of the proposed activities, and

therefore it (mining) will not be discussed nor be part of the environmental scoping

assessment (ESA).

The EPL 7008 is located about 15 km south of of Karibib and cover a surface area of

area of 169 hectares (ha). The EPL overlies Farm Habis No. 71, with its western

boundary within the borderline that separates Farm Habis 71 and Portion 1 of Farm

Habis No. 71. The locality map and the map showing EPL 7008 and the farms it overlies

are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2 below.


Page 2 of 13

Figure 1: Locality map of EPL 7008 near Karibib (15 km south) in the Erongo Region

Figure 2: Location of EPL 7008 on Farm Habis 71 and Portion 1 of Farm Habis 71


Page 3 of 13

1.1 Why is the Environmental Scoping Assessment required?

According to the Environmental Management Act (EMA) No. 7 of 2007’s

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations of 2012, exploration and mining

of mineral resources is a listed activity in that must not be undertaken without an

Environmental Clearance Certificate (ECC). The provision of such listed activities are

as follows:

• ‘’Regulation 3.1: The construction of facilities for any process pr activities

which requires a license, right or other form of authorization, and the renewal

of a license, right or other form of authorization, in terms of the Minerals

(Prospecting and Mining Act), 1992.

• Regulation 3.2: Other forms of mining or extraction of any natural resource

whether regulated by law or not.

• Regulation 3.3: Resource extraction, manipulation, conservation, and related

activities.’’

To inform the ECC decision, an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study must be

conducted as per the requirements of the EMA No. 7 of 2007 and its 2012 EIA

Regulations. Therefore, an ECC application should be submitted to the project’s

competent authority and an environmental assessment study conducted. In the case

of exploration and mining projects, the competent authority is the Ministry of Mines

and Energy (MME). Thus, the ECC application will be submitted to the MME. A date

stamped copy of the ECC application (by MME) will then be uploaded on the

Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism (MEFT)’s EIA Portal for project registration

purposes. Once the ESA process is completed, the findings will be consolidated into

an ESA Report and together with the draft Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

submitted to the Department of Environmental Affairs and Forestry (DEAF) via the EIA

Portal for evaluation and consideration of the ECC issuance.


Page 4 of 13

The overall aim of this stage of the ESA process is to identify and consult interested

and affected parties (I&APs), identify potential project impacts on biophysical and

social receiving environments, assess these impacts and provide mitigation measures

thereof. These findings will then be incorporated into the ESA Report. A draft EMP will

also be developed to mitigate the potential (adverse) impacts stemming from the

proposed project activities to ensure environmental and social sustainability.

1.2 The Purpose of the Background Information Document (BID)

This document (the BID) was prepared as part of the ESA process to:

• Briefly introduce the proposed project and related activities to potential

interested and affected parties (I&APs).

• provide information on the Environmental Scoping Assessment (ESA) process

and how I&APs can be involved.

• invite members of the public to register as I&APs and added to the ESA

database so that they can stay informed about the ESA progress throughout

its process; and

• To provide all I&APs with an opportunity to comment or provide inputs/

concerns on the proposed project activities, which entails concerns/issues on

the biophysical and socio-economic aspects, and any other issues of concern

related to the proposed project.

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposed activity will only entail the detailed exploration for good quality

dimension stone only. The proposed exploration activities are anticipated to last for six

to twelve (12) months. The planned activities and required resources and

infrastructure are briefly described below.

2.1 Project Inputs

2.1.1 Vehicles and Equipment and Services Infrastructure

The inputs required for the exploration activities in terms of vehicles, equipment and

services infrastructure are presented in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Project required vehicles, equipment, and services infrastructure Vehicles, Machinery and Equipment Services infrastructure

4 x 4 pickup trucks Movable shade facility near the working spots


Page 5 of 13

Vehicles, Machinery and Equipment Services infrastructure

Butterfly cutter Prefabricated offices and accommodation

(subject to approval of landowners)

Dump trucks Fuel / Power Supply (for vehicles and

machinery / equipment): Trailer mounted

diesel tank of about 3 000 litres (designed and

constructed according to the South African

Bureau of Standards (SABS)).

Fuel supply (for personnel use to cook): The

Proponent will provide firewood or fuel to be

used for food preparation by the site workers.

No firewood will be collected on the farms,

without the owners’ permission.

Diamond wire-saw cutter and coring

equipment

Water supply: water tanks with dispersion

pipelines (for exploration and domestic

consumption) will be on site.

The anticipated water requirement is 1 000

liters per day. This water will not be abstracted

from the farm or site boreholes, but it will be

carted to site from elsewhere and stored in

tanks. Water transportation to site will only be

done on certain days of the week but not

daily.

Excavator / front-end loader to scoop up

sandy overburden.

Drilling fluids stored in manufacturers

approved containers.

Down-The-Hole (DTH) Drilling rig Camping facilities (tents)

Air compressors Waste management: different waste

containers / bins for different waste type

generated on site will be provided and

emptied once a week or depending the

capacity of onsite waste storage facilities. The

waste will be disposed of at the nearest

approved waste management facility in the

area.

Diesel generator for power supply Sanitation and human waste: Portable

ablution facilities with septic tanks will be


Page 6 of 13

Vehicles, Machinery and Equipment Services infrastructure

provided on site and emptied according

manufacturers’ instructions.

Two-way radios for constant communication

on site activities and matters

Roads: the EPL will be accessed from the

main road (C32) and district road (D1952) via

the existing local farm access (gravel) roads.

New tracks to the different targeted

exploration sites on the farm will be created.

The Proponent may need to do some

upgrade on the access road to ensure that it

is fit to accommodate project related

vehicles, such as heavy trucks.

Dozers (to clear vegetation along planned

drilling site access roads).

Health and Safety: Adequate and

appropriate Personal Protective Equipment

(PPE) will be provided to every project

personnel while on and working at site.

A minimum of two first aid kits will be readily

available on site to attend to potential minor

injuries.

Fire management: A minimum of basic

firefighting equipment, i.e. two fire

extinguishers will be readily available in

vehicles, at the working sites and camps.


Page 7 of 13

2.1.2 Project Personnel and Associated Resources

The proposed activities will employ between five and twelve (12) people (total

number of skilled, semi and unskilled). Those exploration (skilled) workers / employees

who may not be from the project area will be accommodated in tented camp

facilities or rented farm buildings where available. Workers who will be sourced from

the site area / farms will be commuting from their homes to the work sites. However,

should the commuting turn out to be unfeasible for the working schedules, those local

workers would be expected to be housed in exploration camps with others for the

duration of the project. The temporary site camps will only be set up if the

farmers/landowners and occupiers of land agree to that. Therefore, agreements will

need to be reached between the two parties (Proponent and farmers) prior

All equipment and vehicles will be stored at a designated area near the temporary

accommodation on site.

2.2 Planned activities: Proposed Exploration Method (Techniques)

The Proponent intends to adopt a systematic prospecting approach starting with

desktop study, field evaluation and mapping (non-invasive techniques) and then

drilling (invasive technique). The proposed activities are summarized as follows.

2.2.1 Desktop Study

The exploration program will commence with a review of geological maps and

historical drilling and / or exploration data for the area, if any.

2.2.2 Field Evaluation

The field evaluation is to be carried out by a qualified geologist, aimed at locating

suitable host rock outcrops in the field from where the:

• General soundness (intactness).

• Appearance (patterns and colour); and

• Joint and vein spacing can be evaluated.


Page 8 of 13

Small samples (about 30 cm3 in dimension) will be removed for cutting and polishing

to provide insights on whether or not the stone can be polished to an acceptable

finish, as well as to give an indication of the hardness of the stone from a sawing and

finishing point of view. Where field evaluation indicates a potentially economical

viable deposit, detailed geological mapping will be conducted by means of

mapping transversely across exposed / cleaned segments of the rock unit. Where

cleaning of the rock unit is required to aid geological mapping, air compressors will

be used to expose the rock. The mapping is aimed at delineating major geological

structures such as fault and shear zones (zones of weakness), the extent of veins, as

well as further delineation of fracture / discontinuity frequencies.

Collectively, field evaluation and detailed geological mapping will result in the

production of a refined and detailed geological map for the targeted sites on the

EPL.

2.2.3 Detailed Exploration

The refined geological map would then assist in target generation for subsequent

detailed exploration such as drilling and possibly localized test quarrying (for

exploration purposes only). A typical drill rig used for this type of exploration drilling is

shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: A typical example of a Down-The-Hole drill rig

A vertical and inclined core drilling with a down-the hole (DTH) drill rig will be carried

out in selected areas to provide information on the:

• Vertical extent of the host formation.

• Color and texture.

• Joint spacing or

• Possible defects at depth.


Page 9 of 13

It is anticipated that drilling activities will require a small (6 m wide) tracked access

roads to gain access to the actual drilling sites for the air compressor and water truck.

2.3 Feasibility Study: Test Quarrying (Exploration component)

Where exploration drilling yields positive results, test quarrying by means of butterfly

cutting will be conducted. This will be done to fully evaluate the recovery of saleable

blocks, and better optimize the extraction methods, production rates and

operational costs in future. The exploration test quarrying will only be carried out on

select targeted areas of the EPL and shall be performed on as small areas as possible

to minimize environmental impacts that are associated with test quarrying. The

outcomes / results of the test quarrying will be recorded and archived by the

Proponent for future use (when mining will be considered).

It is important to note that the test quarrying referred to above is only a component of

exploration activities, to be done at a very small-scale level on targeted sites of the

EPL to enable the Proponent to get sufficient and reliable exploration data, but not for

mining purposes. Therefore, this ESA process and its subsequent reporting will only

cover exploration activities.

2.4 Rehabilitation of Explored Sites and Decommissioning

The impact on the physical environment can be lessened by planning with future

decommissioning of explored sites within the EPL boundaries in mind. Therefore,

towards the end of each exploration activity on active sites of the EPL, progressive /

ongoing rehabilitation will be carried out by the Proponent. This can be achieved

through rock shading, and partial backfilling with topsoil. This will be done to ensure

that the disturbed land sites are left close to their pre-exploration state as much as

possible.

3 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS

The EMA No. 7 of 2007 defines the EIA as a process of identifying, predicting, and

evaluating the significant effects of activities on the environment, as well as the risks

and consequences of activities. The process also includes project alternatives and

options for mitigation, with a view to minimising negative impacts, maximising

benefits, and promoting compliance with the principles of best practice

environmental management. The following potential impacts have thus far been

identified and will form part of the pool of impacts to be assessed during the ESA

process and subsequent reporting documents.


Page 10 of 13

3.1 Potential Impacts

The proposed exploration activities on EPL 7008 are associated with potential

impacts, both positive and negative. These potential impacts (listed under section

3.1.1 and 3.1.2) are those that were identified by the Environmental Assessment

Practitioner / Consultant based on previous projects and anticipated project

activities and therefore should not be deemed as final or the only ones.

3.1.1 Positive impacts

• Socio-economic development through employment creation and skills

transfer

• Increased support for local businesses through the procurement of

consumable items such as Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), machinery

spare parts, lubricants, etc.

• Contribution to national economic development through annual levies paid

to the Government (through the Ministry of Mines and Energy) for Exclusive

Prospecting Licenses (EPLs).

• Improved geological understanding of the site area regarding dimension

stones.

3.1.2 Negative (adverse) impacts

• Physical land / soil disturbance: The invasive exploration activities could

potentially lead to site soils’ disturbance. The potential damage to subgrade

due to traffic compaction along tracked / haul access roads. This has the

potential to increase surface runoff, especially were the topsoil is relatively

cohesive.

• Air quality issue: potential dust generated from surface excavation, drilling

and diamond wire sawing could compromise the surrounding air quality.

• Vibrations associated with drilling and stone cutting activities

• Impact on local biodiversity (fauna and flora): some vegetation may need to

be removed to create access roads and working space. This may potentially

lead to loss of the vegetation and habitat disturbance. Some exploration

activities such as drilling may disturb local / farm and wildlife (poaching) on

the farms.

• Noise: potential increase in noise levels from exploration vehicles and

machinery through the area covered by the EPL may be a nuisance to locals.

• Environmental pollution through different types of waste generated on the site

due to improper management and disposal.


Page 11 of 13

• Impact on service infrastructure such as local roads: the temporary potential

increase in vehicular traffic during exploration may exert additional pressure

on the local roads, especially by heavy vehicles such as trucks carrying

project materials and equipment (drilling rig).

• Visual/ aesthetic impact of the affected sites of the EPL, especially

considering that the targeted sites are in areas of positive relief. This is

unavoidable especially with the exploration intrusive methods, but this will be

mitigated by progressive rehabilitation efforts.

• Archaeological or cultural heritage impact through unintentional uncovering

of unknown archaeological objects or sites by certain project activities such

as exploration drilling and excavation on targeted sites on the EPL.

• Loss of property value: if not properly and effectively managed, the intrusive

exploration activities could potentially leave unpleasant scars and sights on

the farms leading to a decrease in the farm value.

• Soil and water resources pollution: the potential risk of hydrocarbon spillages

and wastewater in the working areas and workshops if not properly managed

may contaminate the site soils and eventually reach groundwater systems.

• Health and safety hazards to personnel associated with the movement /

operating of machinery. Not only to project personnel but also residents

(locals) in the affected area.

• Impact of poor communication (proper liaison) between the Proponent and

the farmers or occupier of land with regards to the project activities could

result in long-terms unresolved conflicts.

• General social nuisance to farmers / landowners: The project personnel might

intrude on private farm areas such as houses and other restricted areas. This

may include attempted farm animal hunting and snaring. Another nuisance is

when some project personnel forget to close farm gates when entering or

leaving the farm which may lead to farm animal (both domestic and wildlife)

escaping the property. These would potentially result in conflicts and tensions

between the farm owner(s) and the Proponent.

These pre-identified potential impacts together with the new ones to be raised and

submitted by the I&APs (if any) will be described, assessed and mitigation measures

provided thereof in the ESA Report and in a form of management action plans in the


Page 12 of 13

draft EMP. To ensure that the recommend management measures are effectively

implemented and yield the desired outcomes, environmental monitoring (including

performance indicators, implementation responsibilities, targets, etc.) will be provided

in the EMP.

3.2 The Public Participation Process

Public consultation is a crucial part of the environmental scoping process that is also

provided for in Section 21 to 24 of the 2012 EIA Regulations. The process provides

interested and affected parties (I&APs) an opportunity to find out more about the

proposed activity and it allows a platform for the public to raise any issues or

concerns. The concerns and issues or comments raised and submitted by the I&APs

will form basis of the ESA process and compilation of the ESA Report and draft EMP.

A public consultation meeting is a crucial component of an environmental

assessment and has been considered and scheduled towards the end of September

2020. However, it is important to note that given the current global outbreak of the

Coronavirus (COVID-19) and the pronounced State of Emergency, the consultation

meeting may not take place, but this will depend on the health situation and

Regulations set by the Head of State. The progress on the situation and changes on

whether the public consultation meeting will be held or not, the details (date, time,

and venue) will be communicated with all the registered I&APs.

For this reason, the I&APs are encouraged to submit their comments and concerns in

writing throughout the comments period of this ESA. For these comments to be

considered, they must reach Omavi Geotechnical & Geo-environmental Consultants

cc before the closing date, which is Monday, 28 September 2020. Please see Omavi

Consultants’ contact details at the end of this document.

All those who register as I&APs for this ESA process will be notified when the Scoping

Assessment stage is completed and will receive the draft ESA Report to review and

have another opportunity to comment on it.

3.3 Consultations as per the Minerals (Mining and Prospecting) Act No. 33 of

1992

The usual environmental assessment public consultation also incorporates the

requirements of Section 52 (1) of the Minerals Act whereby the project Proponent and

or the holder of a mineral license covering someone else’s land is required to reach

an agreement with the landowner (farmer) prior to accessing the farms and


Page 13 of 13

undertaking any project activities on their land. This entails the signing of agreements

to access the land and consent to undertake the intended activities on the land /

farm. It is important to note that site/land access permits and other agreements

between the Proponent and the farmers to commence with the proposed exploration

activities will only be done once an environmental clearance certificate has been

issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism (MEFT).

Should you require more information about the proposed project activities and its ESA

process or need send us your concerns, issues, or comments, please contact us on

the details provided below.

Environmental Consultant: Omavi Geotechnical & Geo-Environmental Consultants

Contact Person: Ms. Fredrika Shagama

Mobile.: +264 81 826 4867 (For record keeping, comments should

be submitted via a short message service (SMS) or

WhatsApp for I&APs without email addresses)

Email: [email protected]


BID Circulation email to pre-identified I&APs and new registered I&APs after the newspaper adverts

Legal NoticesRegskennisgewings

035

NOTICE: Take notice that Mr Brian Muzwembiri intents to apply to the Windhoek Muni-cipal Council for the erection of a three-storey residential building on Erf 555AB:Township: Windhoek. AUSBLICK, Engeberg Street. The Erf 634 is zoned Residen-tial with a density of 1:900 m². The proposed developments will enable the owner to erect a three-storey residential buil-ding. The owner’s current in-tentions are to erect and use the building solely for residen-tial purposes.Further take notice that the plan of the erf lies for inspec-tion on the town planning noti-ce board in the Customer Care Centre, Main Municipal Offi-ces, Rev. Michael Scott Street, Windhoek.Further take notice that any person objecting to the pro-posed building as set out abo-ve may lodge such objection together with the grounds the-reof, with the City in writing within 14 days of the last publi-cation of this notice.

DM0202000368781

MUNICIPALITY OF HEN-TIESBAY NOTICE. INTENTION TO ALIENATE A PORTION OF FARM HENTIESBAAI TOWN AND TOWNLANDS NO. 133 IN EXTENT 25 HECTARES TO MESSRS FRANCO CIVIL ENGI-NEERING CC.By virtue of Council Resolution C07/02/05/2019/4th/2019 and in terms of Section 63(2) (b) of the Local Authorities Act, (Act 23 of 1992) as amended, read in conjunction with Sec-tion 30 (1) (t) of the Local Au-thorities Act 1992 (Act 23 of 1992) as amended, notice is hereby given that the Munici-pal Council of Hentiesbay in-tent to alienate a portion of a reminder of the Farm 133. Hen-tiesbay town and town lands measures in extent of 25 Hec-tares at a cost of N$0.10 p/m², amounting to N$25 000.00 (Twenty Five Thousand Nami-bia Dollars Only) with an opti-on to purchase at a rate of N$ 25 p/m² which equates to N$6 250 000.00 (Six Million Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Namibia Dollars only) by way of private treaty to Messrs Franco Civil Engineering cc for the pur-pose of developing a Medical Tourism, University Hospital in Henties Bay.Further take note that the loca-lity and the layout plan of the property lies open for inspecti-on during office hours at the of-fices of the Municipal Council situated at the corner of Jakkal-sputz Road and Nickey Iyambo Avenue.Any person(s) having objection(s) to the intended alienation of the portion may lodge such objection(s) with full motivation of such an objec-tion to the undersigned, within fourteen (14) days after the se-cond placement of the advert.The Chief Executive OfficerP.O.Box 61Henties Bay

DM0202000368321

IN THE High Court Of The Re-public Of Namibia Held at Windhoek. Case No : HC-MD-CIV-ACT-CON-2019/05305. In the matter between: WHALE ROCK CEMENT (PTY) LTD T/A CHEETAH CEMENT - Plaintiff AND CHARLTON IN-TERNATIONAL - 1st Defendant, CHARLTON R USEB - 2nd De-fendant. NOTICE OF SALE IN EXECUTION Pursuant to a Judgement gran-ted by the above Court, the fol-lowing goods will be sold in exe-cution by a public auction on 1st October 2020 at 15h00 at Erf 1631 Ndilimani Cultural Troupe Street, Tsumeb, namely: 1x Electric stove, 1x microwave, 1x Defy fridge, 1x deep freezer, 1x coolbox, 1x round table, 3x chairs, 1x lounge suite, 1x TV-cupboard, 1x flatscreen TV, 1x DStv-decoder, 1x DVD-player with surround sound, 1x book-shelf, 11x barchairs, 2x double-beds. Terms: Cash to the highest bid-der. Dated at Windhoek on 18 Au-gust 2020. FISHER, QUARMBY & PFEIFERLegal Practitioners for PlaintiffCnr. Robert Mugabe Avenue & Thorer StreetPO Box 37, Windhoek(Ref.: AAH/cvz/241000)

DM0202000368783

Legal NoticesRegskennisgewings

035

PERMANENT CLOSURE OF PORTION A OF REMAINDER PORTION 5 OF TSANDI TOWN AND TOWNLANDS NO 988, AS STREET. Notice is hereby given in terms of article 50(3)(a)(ii)of the Local Authorities Act of 1992 (Act 23 of 1992) that the Tsandi Village Council proposes to close perma-nently the under-mentioned street as indicated on the plan TSANDI STR_CL which lies for inspection during office hours at theTsandi Village Council Notice Board. Upon Closure, Portion A of Remainder Portion 5 of Tsandi-Town and Townlands No 988 will be consolidated with Erf 972 and Erf 973, Extension 5, Tsandi. Objections to the proposed clo-sing are to be served on the Secre-tary: Townships Board, Private Bag 13289, and Office of the Chief Exe-cutive Officer, P O Box 373, Tsan-di, within 14 days after the appea-rance of this notice in accordance with Article 50 (3)(a)(iv) of the above Act. The last day for objections is 1 Oc-tober2020. Tsandi Village CouncilP O Box 373TSANDIAttention: Ms R Nuule WINPLAN TOWN AND REGIO-NAL PLANNERSPO Box 90761Klein WindhoekAttention: Mr L Esterhuizen.

DM0202000368756

IN THE Magistrate’s Court for the District of Tsumeb. Held at Tsumeb. Case No: 35/2020. In the matter between: REDIMERE ACADEMY CC - Plainti-ff and HARRY JANSEN VAN VUU-REN - Defendant. NOTICE OF SALE IN EXECUTION Pursuant to the Judgement granted by the above Honrouble Court, the following goods will be sold in exe-cution by public auction on Thurs-day, 1 October 2020 at 15h00 at Erf 1631 Ndilimani Cultural Troupe Street, Tsumeb, Republic of Nami-bia, namely: 1x Grey trailer, 10x sheep, 20x rolls of wire, 1x spit braai, 2x wood saws, 1x counter with gas braai, 1x gate. TERMS: Cash to the highest bidder. Dated at Tsumeb this 14 Septem-ber 2020.MARONEL DU PLESSIS LEGAL PRACTITIONER Erf 515, Corner of Sam Nujoma and Ndilimani Cultural Troupe Streets,TsumebTel: 067-227694Fax: 067-227697(RED1/0014).

DM0202000368757

thursday 17 september 20206 Market Watch

EQUEST FOR SUBMISSION OF EXPRESSION OF NTEREST(EoI) FORCONSULTING SERVICESREI No: KFW HWC 02-2020 – BMZ 2017 68 514

The Community Conservation Fund of Namibia (CCFN) is an association not-for-gain incorporated under Section 21 of Namibia’s Companies Act of 2004. The organization was registered in 2017 to pursue a sustainable financing model for the Community Based- Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) programme in Namibia.

CCFN was appointed by the Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism (MEFT) to be the Project Executing Agency (PEA) responsible for the overall management of a project titled “Poverty Oriented Support to Communal Conservation in Namibia”. The Project’s main objective is to contribute to biodiversity conservation and rural development through the establishment of sustainable Human-Wildlife-Conflict (HWC) management systems in Namibia’s communal conservancies. The Project is co-financed by the Federal Republic of Germany through the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) (through the KfW Development Bank). A grant has been allocated into the sinking fund for the HWC financing window of the CCFN. CCFN is executing the project in cooperation with the MEFT and other relevant stakeholders for 4 years.

As per the requirement of the Project’s Implementation Manual, CCFN hereby invites potential suppliers to express interest by submitting their documents for a pre-qualification evaluation. The objective of this pre-qualification exercise is to receive applications from a broad range of potential consultants (institutions, organizations and individuals alike) for evaluation to establish a database/listing of consultants who meet the specified criteria for supplying the Project with certain consulting services required in the first year of project implementation (2020). This invitation is the first step of a two-stage procurement process. The list of pre-qualified consultants will provide the basis for restricted invitations to tender or provide quotations. As the need for each service as listed below arises during the year, relevant Terms of Reference will be sent to pre-qualified consultants to request technical and/or financial proposals. For each subsequent invitation to tender/quote, at least the top-five pre-qualified suppliers for the service will be given preference. Kindly submit a complete Curriculum Vitae and/or company profile and other relevant supporting documents whichever is applicable.

List of Consulting Services Requireda) Coordinate and facilitate the HWC project activities in the different clusters an act as

Implementation Support Organizations (ISO). The ISO’s will mobilize qualified staff who may: • facilitate planning notably for support to developing funding proposals for submission to CCFN.• carry out support to the actual implementation of approved proposals/field implementation of

agreed measures according to contracts signed.• Manage the financial resources following the Grant contracts and submit progress reports.b) GIS and Mapping.c) Review of existing and further development of guidelines for HWC management planning, monitoring &

communication.d) Story telling (Authoring/writing) services for project communications and outreach.e) Environmental and Social compliance review of funded project measures.f) Proof reading and formatting of Project Reports and documentation

A request to obtain the Standard Pre-Qualification Document (SPQ) for this EoI should be addressed to The Project Finance and procurement officer by email at [email protected].

NB: Each service should be applied for separately on its dedicated SPQ document, An SPQ document completed and containing more than one service will be disregarded.

All inquiries or requests for clarification should be received 10 days before the closing date indicated below. Responses to any inquiries (including an explanation of the query) will be circulated to all applicants without identifying the source of inquiry.

Submission of EOIThe standard prequalification documents of Expression of Interest shall be submitted to the attention of The Finance and Procurement Officer not later than 01 October 2020, 12H00 local time) at the following address:

Poverty Oriented Support to Community Conservation in Namibiac/o Community Conservation Fund (CCFN),Suite 7A Southport Building, Southern Industrial Area, Windhoek, Namibia

Or Alternatively emails to: [email protected]

ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES ON EXCLUSIVE PROSPECTING LICENSE

(EPL) 7241 IN THE ERONGO REGION

Under the Environmental Management Act, 2007, (Act No. 7 of 2007) & its 2012 EIA Regulations, the proposed activity cannot be undertaken without an Environmental Clearance Certificate (ECC). As per the EIA Regulations’ requirements, the public is hereby notified that an application for the proposed project’s ECC will be submitted to the Environmental Commissioner.

Proposed project activities: Mineral exploration of dimension stone only.Location: The EPL 7241 is located about 20 km southeast of Karibib, stretching over an area of 2 355 hectares (ha) and extending over Portion 2 of Farm Okakoara No.43, Portion 5 of Farm Kaliombo No. 119, Remainder Ext. of Farm Kaliombo No. 119 and Remainder of Farm Ombujomenge No. 39.

The Project Proponent: MKN Mining Consultants cc

Environmental Assessment Practitioner: OMAVI Geotechnical & Geo-environmental Consultants cc

All Interested & Affected Parties (I&APs) are hereby invited to register and submit written comments on the proposed project and to request for the Background Information Document (BID) using the contact details below and to do so by close of business on Monday, 28th September 2020. Furthermore, in wake of the current State of Emergency’ movement and public gathering restrictions due to COVID-19, we wish to inform I&APs that the public meeting details will be communicated to all registered I&APs.

Tel: +264 81 826 4867E-mail: [email protected]

ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES ON EXCLUSIVE PROSPECTING LICENSE (EPL)

6139 IN THE ERONGO REGION

Under the Environmental Management Act, 2007, (Act No. 7 of 2007) & its 2012 EIA Regulations, the proposed activity cannot be undertaken without an Environmental Clearance Certificate (ECC). As per the EIA Regulations’ requirements, the public is hereby notified that an application for the proposed project’s ECC will be submitted to the Environmental Commissioner.

Proposed project activities: Mineral exploration of dimension stone and industrial minerals (aggregate) only.

Location: The EPL 6139 is located about 30 km southeast of Karibib in the Erongo Region, stretching over an area of 4 995 hectares (ha) and extending over three Farms, namely: Portion 1 (a Portion of Portion A) of Okongava No.72, Remainder of Farm Neu-Schwaben No.148 and Portion 2 of Farm Neu-Schwaben No. 148.

The Project Proponent: Agulhas Mineral Resources cc

Environmental Assessment Practitioner: OMAVI Geotechnical & Geo-environmental Consultants cc

All Interested & Affected Parties (I&APs) are hereby invited to register and submit written comments on the proposed project and to request for the Background Information Document (BID) using the contact details below and to do so by close of business on Monday, 28th September 2020. Furthermore, in wake of the current State of Emergency’ movement and public gathering restrictions due to COVID-19, we wish to inform I&APs that the public meeting details will be communicated to all registered I&APs.

Tel: +264 81 826 4867E-mail: [email protected]

Nuus in

Afrikaans

24 uur7 dae

’n week

www.republikein.com.na

APPENDIX G: Email Invitation to the Public Consultant Meeting

Date: 26 September 2020

JOINT PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING MINUTES FOR THE:

ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING ASSESSMENT (ESA) FOR THE PROPOSED EXPLORATION OF

DIMENSION STONE AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS ON EXCLUSIVE PROSPECTING LICENSE (EPL)

6139 AND EXPLORATION OF DIMENSION STONE ONLY ON EPL 7008 AND 7241 NEAR KARIBIB IN

THE ERONGO REGION

Date: Saturday, 26 September 2020

Time: 10h30

Venue: Portion 2 of Farm Neu Schwaben 148 (Unit A), about 30 km southeast of Karibib

The Meeting was attended by fifty-six (56) people (Please refer to the attached attendance register).

1. INTRODUCTION AND WELCOMING

Mr. Fredrika Shagama (Environmental Assessment Practitioner / Consultant from OMAVI Geotechnical

& Geo-Environmental Consultants cc) opened the meeting by introducing herself, welcomed, and

thanked everyone in attendance for making time to attend the meeting. She briefly explained to the

attendees the purpose of the meeting with reference to the Environmental Management Act No. 7 of

2007’s 2012 EIA Regulations on Public Consultation). Ms. Shagama also explained that the public

meeting was a joint engagement to accommodate both the ESA for EPL 6139, 7008 and 7241 since the

three EPLs are all found in the same area and share similar planned activities (scope of work). The

meeting was also arranged to take place on Farm Neu Schwaben 148 (a government farm) because it

would be easier to have all the affected members of the public at this venue compared to hosting a

meeting on private/commercial farms (private access issues).

Given the fact that the public meeting was held during the COVID-19 time, the Regulations were

adhered to. This was done by ensuring that there is a social distance between the attendees. Since the

number of people was more than 50 (recommended for gatherings), the attendees were split into two

groups of sitting. This was done whereby one group was about 10 meters from the other, just far enough

to maintain social distance but enough to ensure clear communication and engagement between

the two groups throughout the meeting. Before the attendance register was circulated, Ms. Shagama

reminded the attendees of the ongoing COVID-19 Regulations and that there was a hand sanitizer to

be used prior to registering names on the attendance registers (there were two attendance to limit the

number of signing the registers, i.e., each sitting group had its own register). Every meeting attendee

had a face mask on.

Ms. Shagama presented the meeting agenda. Since some of the meeting attendees were elders from

the area who only spoke Damara-Nama, Otjherero, Oshiwambo and or Afrikaans Languages and to

ensure transparency and effective communication in the meeting, Mr. Gert Nauiseb (a Damara-Nama,

Afrikaans, and English speaker) and Mr. Pekakarua Lucky Metirapi (an Afrikaans, Otjiherero and English

speaker) from the Neu Schwaben community volunteered to translate for the elders (from English to

Damara-Nama or Afrikaans, and Otjiherero) throughout the meeting. The two gentlemen also provided

translation to Ms. Shagama (from Damara-Nama, Afrikaans, Otjiherero to English) to make sure that all

comments and other inputs presented in both English and the local languages were recorded in the

minutes for consideration in the ESA Report.

The meeting attendance register was then circulated for the attendees to write down their names,

contact details and sign so that they could be added to the existing list of interested and affected

parties (I&APs) / Stakeholders and receive further information on the ESA process.

It was noticed that the meeting was mainly just attended by the community (affected) members from

the Neu Schwaben Farm. This is probably because those residents own mining claims that are found

within the EPL6139, and therefore wanted to express their opinions on the proposed exploration on the

EPL and how these activities could impact their ongoing small-scale mining/their livelihood.

2. MEETING AGENDA AND PRESENTATION

Ms. Shagama presented the agenda of the meeting which included the following main points:

2.1 Explanation of what an ESA is, its Process and the Public Role in the Process

Ms. Shagama explained what an ESA is and why it is required for the proposed exploration activities

(she explained that exploration works are one of the listed activities that cannot be undertaken without

an environmental clearance certificate (ECC) from the Environmental Commissioner).

2.2` Project Desirability and Brief Description of the Project

The project desirability was explained to the meeting attendees and how the proposed activities would

be undertaken (brief project description).

2.3 Presentation of Potential Project Impacts

To ensure transparency and that the attendees understand both sides of the proposed project

activities, Ms. Shagama also presented the potential pre-identified potential positive and negative

environmental and social impacts stemming from the proposed activities on the EPLs.

2.4 Public Open Discussion (Interactive Session)

At the end of the presentation of the ESA process, project activities description and potential impacts,

the floor was open whereby the meeting attendees were afforded an opportunity to ask questions

and/or raise their concerns with regards to the proposed exploration.

The Public Open Discussion was done in an interactive session form whereby the members of the public

in the meeting could raise their concerns with the Environmental Consultant.

Crucial points were raised by the public, and where possible, responses (to non-technical questions)

were provided in the meeting by the Environmental Consultant (Ms. Shagama). Where questions or

concerns where beyond the Consultant’s understanding, these were noted down to get the right and

adequate answers from the Proponents and include them in the ESA Report. The community members

raised several issues and concerns that were a repetition of the other. These issues and concerns were

recorded and summarized as presented in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Issues, suggestions and comments received during Public Consultation Meeting on 26 September 2020

No. Name of the

speaker/commentor

& Capacity

Comment/Issue/Suggestion Response by the Environmental

Consultant

1. The name was not

provided

Does it mean that we cannot work

before the ECC is granted?

The current work on your mining

claims will continue as usual. The

ECC that is being applied for under

the ESA for which the public

meeting held is for the proposed

exploration work, but not for the

current work done on the mining

claims.

2. Jesaya Paulus What is the difference between an EPL

and mining claim?

An EPL is usually bigger than a

mining claim in size, which is why

you mostly find mining claim(s)

within EPLs. You also have different

applicants applying for different

commodities over the same area of

interest. However, the two (EPL and

mining claim) on the same area

cannot be mining nor apply to mine

the exact same type of commodity.

3. General concern by

different attendees

(from the community)

We have 34 mining claims. If the

exploration works start, will they not

affect our mining?

The EPL and mining claims operators

can co-exist, but clear written

agreements, communication and

mutual respect need to be

established so that there is no

conflict over work in the long run.

This would usually be indicated in

the permits issued by the Ministry of

Mines and Energy on the

commodities that each operator is

interested in.

Furthermore, this ESA Consultation is

No. Name of the

speaker/commentor

& Capacity


Consultant

for the exploration phase only, for

which the works will be narrowed

down to smaller areas of the EPL,

but not for the entire EPL. Once, the

Proponent has found feasible small

areas within the EPL, they will then

go back to the MME to apply for a

mining license which will enable

them to move to the next phase

which is mining. However, before

they start mining, they will need to

have another environmental

assessment process, which will

include consultation with you as a

community where you can present

further concerns and issues on the

mining phase itself.

4. Gerson Tjiho Once we agree that Proponent can

start mining, and they come across a

tourmaline pocket, is it theirs or ours

(mine)?

In this case tourmaline is not the

target for the Proponent’s work.

Therefore, to ensure that there is no

conflict over the mineral, this will

form part of the written agreements

to be reached between you as an

individual (owner) of the mining

claim area or its part that may have

been explored by the Proponent

and the NIMA Representatives and

decide what happens to that

tourmaline encountered by the

Proponent during exploration. An

amicable solution will be reached

between the involved parties.

5. Joseph Eigab EPL has more money and machinery

which means that small-scale miners will

be taken out of business

This may be true that the Proponent

(owner of the EPL) have more

money and advanced machinery.

However, their aim will not be to

compete with the small-scale miners

on what is being mined currently but

for exploration purposes only with a

focus on dimension stone and

industrial minerals on the EPL (6139).

6. Victor Angula Did the Ministry of Mines and Energy This is a common practice on most

No. Name of the

speaker/commentor

& Capacity


Consultant

(MME) ever granted work of miners and

EPL before to co-exist or is it new at Neu

Schwaben?

EPLs where you have someone

exploring or mining a different

commodity on an EPL with mining

claims mining a different

commodity.

7. Pekakarua L. Metirapi Is it possible to arrange an MME meeting

with small-scale miners?

Side comment: The general feeling is

that the EPL is not clear to them

(miners). The fear is that once the EPL is

operational, they will lose out (their work

as their source of income).

We had a meeting with the Ministry of

Environment, Forestry and Tourism

(MEFT) and Ministry of Mines and Energy

(MME) and the promised that a

consultant was coming

The presence of the EPL works does

not mean end of business or

operations for the small-scale miners.

Therefore, the current work will

continue and the EPL owner

(Proponent) will work on the part of

the EPL that does not have a

significant impact on the mining

claims. However, in the case that

the EPL works targets an area within

a mining claim or part of the claim

then a mutual agreement and

solution will need to be reached

between the mining claims owner or

NIMA Representative and the

Proponent

The Consultant referred to by MEFT

and MME is different from us and

they are on a different project. We

have heard about the project;

however, we cannot provide details

because we do not have any

further information about it. You will

probably have to wait for the said

consultant to come meet with you.

8. Tjimuhiva Uakapakua We have a feeling they are consulting

us, but they probably already have a

report and already met the EPL owner

before coming to us

We have not written any report yet

because we need to follow all the

procedures as required by the

Environmental Management Act

and its EIA Regulations, whereby

one of the requirements is to consult

with the affected members of the

public. This is the reason we are

here. To get your comments,

concerns and suggestions that we

can incorporate into the

environmental report and present it

No. Name of the

speaker/commentor

& Capacity


Consultant

to the MEFT for consideration on the

ECC issuance.

The EPL owner appointed us to

undertake the ESA on their behalf as

required by Law because they

cannot do their own assessment as

that would be conflict of interest.

We will compile a draft

environmental assessment report

and the management plan that we

will send back to you for review and

comments before we submit it to

the MEFT.

9. Immanuel

Nangombe

We have been mining tourmaline here

since 1995 and this has been our source

of income for ourselves and our families.

So, if the EPL work start and if they are

for example mining lithium with big

machine, and they come mine on my

mining claims, meaning I will need to

move away. How will we survive? We

are a lot that depend on these mining

claims and it will be difficult for us to

sustain ourselves. Has there been any

other mines that operate on the same

area such as the proposed EPL activities

that would be on the same area with

us?

If a mine comes here and they have big

machines, which means they will affect

our work. This is our livelihood, and we

depend on it. We would also like

examples of where two licenses are on

one area but mining different stones.

We totally understand your concern

and it is valid. We do not think this

will really happen, provided that

mutual communication and

agreements will be put in place for

both the mining claim owners and

Proponent.

The current proposed work is only for

exploration whereby specific site

areas within the EPL will be explored

and narrowed down to smaller

areas that will be selected for future

mining, should exploration yield

favourable results to them

(Proponent). The exploration work is

not meant to evict the small-scale

miners from their area of operations

or mining claims. Should the

exploration works fall within a certain

mining claim or part if, then

agreements will be reached

between the parties, whereby the

claim owner may accept with

conditions or decline the proposal of

exploration work to be undertaken

on their mining claim or parts of it.

The aim of this should be to promote

No. Name of the

speaker/commentor

& Capacity


Consultant

harmonious co-existence of the EPL

works and existing small-scale

mining activities.

10. Gerson Tjiho All these people along the road had

settled around this hill. Settling along the

road came around Jesaya Nyamu and

Ya Toivo’s time we approached them

to get us a buyer (some American man

called Chris). He took about 400 people

with their IDs. Jeremiah mining behind

the man’s house chased people off the

farm saying the will build toilets and

upgrade the land. Some were driven off

the land by gun. We are afraid that the

same thing will happen. Complaints

were sent to the ministry and deputy

minister but only the Founding President

Sam Nujoma listened and solved the

issue.

Well noted. We will try to address this

issue in the environmental report to

ensure that future similar issues do

not occur between the EPL owner

and you as mining claim owners or

the NIMA itself.

Since you are now operating under

the registered body (NIMA) you are

now in a good position (stand a

good ground) to express your

concerns and get answers fairly.

Collective community concerns can

be drafted on one letter (on NIMA

letterhead) and submitted to the

relevant recipient and get

answers/clarification to your queries

or express your dissatisfaction on

related project matters that affect

your community.

There were no further questions or comments/concerns.

The meeting was concluded by Ms. Shagama and encouraged the community members (attendees)

to still send their concerns through SMSes or via email for those with email addresses. She also informed

the attendees that once it is ready for circulation, the draft environmental assessment report will be

compiled, shared electronically with those who provided email addresses. For those without email

addresses, hard copies of the draft ESA Report will be made available at the NIMA Office and the

Karibib Regional Constituency Council Office for viewing and comments.

The meeting was adjourned at 12h30.

Together with some community members of Neu Schwaben (mostly the mining claim owners and

workers), the Environmental Consultant undertook a site visit to some areas of the EPL where current

tourmaline mining is carried at a small-scale mining level. The site visit was aimed at verifying some of

the mining claims activities discussed in the public meeting, the mined-out areas of the mining claims,

the vegetation and possible fauna that could be seen on site. Site notes on different encounters

observed on site were taken for environmental reporting purposes.

APPENDIX I: Attendance Registers for the Joint Public Consultation Meeting: EPL 6139, 7008 & 7241

APPENDIX I: Issues and Response Trail Received on the proposed exploration activities

The significant issues and concerns raised during the public consultation period (after advertising in the newspapers and from the Public

Consultation Meeting) are noted/summarized below and responses provided thereof. These comments, issues and suggestions are presented as

received under Appendix J.

No. Commentor/Name of the

I&AP, Date & Mode of

Communication

Summary of the Comment/issue Response by OMAVI Consultants (Date: 12 October 2020)

Comments, Issues, and concerns received upon seeing the ESA adverts in the newspapers

1. Ms. Bianca Foelscher,

Scanned letter via email

through the Karibib

Constituency Office (14

September 2020)

Please refer to the first 4 pages of Appendix J for the

letter and its full contents.

The significant issues were incorporated and formed basis of the environmental

scoping assessment report and the environmental management plan (EMP).

2. The importance of involving the public from the start

and provide them with relevant project information,

specifically the affected communities (farmers) to

afford them an opportunity to raise concerns, issues,

and suggestions on the proposed mining

development so that future conflicts can be

avoided.

Well noted. This was also one of the issues raised during the public meeting at Farm

Neu Schwaben (please refer to point number 11 of this Table for similar points raised

in the public meeting minutes, attached under Appendix H).

3. Public participation meetings have now become a

necessity and should be always conducted by an

independent and impartial consultant.

Yes, public consultation/participation meetings are crucial and a requirement by

the 2012 EIA Regulations. A joint public consultation meeting (for both EPL 6139, 7008

& 7241) was held on 26 September 2020 on Farm Neu Schwaben 148 and it was

attended by 56 people of which 53 were from the local communities and 3

independent and impartial consultants from OMAVI. The meeting was in an

interactive session form between the OMAVI consultants and meeting attendees

(community members and mainly mining claims owners of mining claims found



Communication


within EPL 6139). The public meeting was arranged and held on Farm Neu Schwaben

as it would easier to be accessed by all the affected farmers and or occupiers of

land than arranging to hold a meeting on a private farm, for instance EPL 7008 or

EPL 7241 that mostly cover private farms. It has already been a struggle to get access

to some private farmers to carry out site assessments (for the ESA and the current

required specialist study (Archaeology/heritage for all exploration and mining

projects)).

4. Small-scale miners are affected by additional large

scale mining developments

This is a valid point and was also raised in the public meeting. The mitigation

measures to address this have been included in the environmental management

plan (EMP)’s Planning Phase Table as an action plan for the Proponent to consider

prior to and throughout the project life cycle.

5. Ms. Coleen Manheimer, via

email (16 September 2020)

Concerns about areas where there are springs

(permanent or seasonal) as they are extremely

important as water sources and habitat for fauna

and flora, including rare (Red Data), endemic and

protected species. These should be excluded from

prospecting activities and set as NO-GO areas.

Well noted. We have incorporated your comment and suggestion in the ESA Report

under the Biodiversity (Fauna and Flora) baseline section and impact assessment as

well as under the mitigation measures in the ESA Report and the Management Plan

(EMP).

6. Visual impact/damage on the crests of koppies and

outcrops when are cut into. Drilling/cutting should be

done away from the crests as possible unless

extraction is going to take place. Even with

mitigation, a slice out of the skyline is very overt and

almost impossible to conceal.

Well noted. The visual impact is assessed under the relevant section in the ESA

Report, mitigation measures provided therein and, in the EMP.



Communication


7. Ms. Coleen Manheimer, via

email (23 September 2020)

In general, diversity is very high in that area, and

species of concern (endemic, protected Red Data

and restricted range) include several in the genera

Aloe and Commiphora, as well as other protected,

endemic and Red Data species. Other species

found in the vicinity of springs is a data-deficient Red

Data species.

There is a need for a desktop vegetation study at

least and for extensive impacts a field study in the

rainy season.

The input is highly appreciated, especially coming from the vegetation specialist.

Through our research for the Flora Baseline, we have also come across the list of

common species in the broader project area and on site from another EIA Report

within kilometre ranges from the EPLs. These species are presented under the

Baseline Environment (Description of the Receiving Environment) of the ESA Report.

A vegetation study is a great idea. However, this would be worthwhile for the next

intensive phase (mining) where great/significant impact on the vegetation would

be anticipated. Once the mining phase is considered in future (once the exploration

activities have yielded favourable (economic feasible) results), a different EIA will

need to be conducted and specialist studies including vegetation will be

undertaken. For exploration activities, the activities are minimal (small-scale and in

extent), site specific bound - to be narrowed down (selected EPL sites only but not

the whole EPL area) and short-term. Therefore, the impact would not be of high

significance during the exploration phase (no major extraction or quarrying apart

from small site areas to test quarrying and get sufficient exploration data for

evaluation and determine feasibility for future mining). Regardless, mitigation

measures to minimize the potential impact of exploration activities on the site

vegetation has been included in the ESA Report and EMP.

8. Mrs Erica Ndalikokule (letter

received via email, 18

September 2020 upon

A site-specific Heritage pact Assessment should be

provided to the National Heritage Council with

sufficient information to understand the impact of

The Archaeological Impact Assessment Study was undertaken by a qualified and

experienced Archaeologist. The Study Report is attached as Appendix K to the ESA

Report



Communication


circulation of the BID to

I&APs))

these activities on the significance of the heritage

resources in this area.

Comments, Issues, and concerns received from the Public Consultation Meeting

9. The name was not provided Does it mean that we cannot work before the ECC is

granted?

The current work on your mining claims will continue as usual. The ECC that is being

applied for under the ESA for which the public meeting held is for the proposed

exploration work, but not for the current work done on the mining claims.

10. What is the difference between an EPL and mining

claim?

An EPL is usually bigger than a mining claim in size, which is why you mostly find

mining claim(s) within EPLs. You also have different applicants applying for different

commodities over the same area of interest. However, the two (EPL and mining

claim) on the same area cannot be mining nor apply to mine the exact same type

of commodity.

11. General concern by different

meeting attendees (from the

community)

We have 34 mining claims. If the exploration works

start, will they not affect our mining?

The EPL and mining claims operators can co-exist, but clear written agreements,

communication and mutual respect need to be established so that there is no

conflict over work in the long run. This would usually be indicated in the permits issued

by the Ministry of Mines and Energy on the commodities that each operator is

interested in.

Furthermore, this ESA Consultation is for the exploration phase only, for which the

works will be narrowed down to smaller areas of the EPL, but not for the entire EPL.

Once, the Proponent has found feasible small areas within the EPL, they will then go

back to the MME to apply for a mining license which will enable them to move to

the next phase which is mining. However, before they start mining, they will need to

have another environmental assessment process, which will include consultation



Communication


with you as a community where you can present further concerns and issues on the

mining phase itself.

12. Gerson Tjiho Once we agree that Proponent can start mining,

and they come across a tourmaline pocket, is it theirs

or ours (mine)?

In this case tourmaline is not the target for the Proponent’s work. Therefore, to ensure

that there is no conflict over the mineral, this will form part of the written agreements

to be reached between you as an individual (owner) of the mining claim area or its

part that may have been explored by the Proponent and the Neu Schwaben

Independent Miners Association (NIMA) Representatives and decide what happens

to that tourmaline encountered by the Proponent during exploration. An amicable

solution will be reached between the involved parties.

13. Joseph Eigab EPL has more money and machinery which means

that small-scale miners will be taken out of business

This may be true that the Proponent (owner of the EPL) have more money and

advanced machinery. However, their aim will not be to compete with the small-

scale miners on what is being mined currently but for exploration purposes only with

a focus on dimension stone and industrial minerals on the EPL (6139).

14. Victor Angula Did the Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME) ever

granted work of miners and EPL before to co-exist or

is it new at Neu Schwaben?

This is a common practice on most EPLs where you have someone exploring or

mining a different commodity on an EPL with mining claims mining a different

commodity.

15. Pekakarua L. Metirapi Is it possible to arrange an MME meeting with small-

scale miners?

Side comment: The general feeling is that the EPL is

not clear to them (miners). The fear is that once the

The presence of the EPL works does not mean end of business or operations for the

small-scale miners. Therefore, the current work will continue and the EPL owner

(Proponent) will work on the part of the EPL that does not have a significant impact

on the mining claims. However, in the case that the EPL works targets an area within

a mining claim or part of the claim then a mutual agreement and solution will need



Communication


EPL is operational, they will lose out (their work as their

source of income).

We had a meeting with the Ministry of Environment,

Forestry and Tourism (MEFT) and Ministry of Mines and

Energy (MME) and the promised that a consultant

was coming

to be reached between the mining claims owner or NIMA Representative and the

Proponent

The Consultant referred to by MEFT and MME is different from us and they are on a

different project. We have heard about the project; however, we cannot provide

details because we do not have any further information about it. You will probably

have to wait for the said consultant to come meet with you.

16. Tjimuhiva Uakapakua We have a feeling they are consulting us, but they

probably already have a report and already met the

EPL owner before coming to us

We have not written any report yet because we need to follow all the procedures

as required by the Environmental Management Act and its EIA Regulations, whereby

one of the requirements is to consult with the affected members of the public. This is

the reason we are here. To get your comments, concerns and suggestions that we

can incorporate into the environmental report and present it to the MEFT for

consideration on the ECC issuance.

The EPL owner appointed us to undertake the ESA on their behalf as required by Law

because they cannot do their own assessment as that would be conflict of interest.

We will compile a draft environmental assessment report and the management plan

that we will send back to you for review and comments before we submit it to the

MEFT.

17. Immanuel Nangombe We have been mining tourmaline here since 1995

and this has been our source of income for ourselves

and our families. So, if the EPL work start and if they

are for example mining lithium with big machine,

We totally understand your concern and it is valid. We do not think this will really

happen, provided that mutual communication and agreements will be put in place

for both the mining claim owners and Proponent.



Communication


and they come mine on my mining claims, meaning

I will need to move away. How will we survive? We

are a lot that depend on these mining claims and it

will be difficult for us to sustain ourselves. Has there

been any other mines that operate on the same

area such as the proposed EPL activities that would

be on the same area with us?

If a mine comes here and they have big machines,

which means they will affect our work. This is our

livelihood, and we depend on it. We would also like

examples of where two licenses are on one area but

mining different stones.

The current proposed work is only for exploration whereby specific site areas within

the EPL will be explored and narrowed down to smaller areas that will be selected

for future mining, should exploration yield favourable results to them (Proponent).

The exploration work is not meant to evict the small-scale miners from their area of

operations or mining claims. Should the exploration works fall within a certain mining

claim or part if, then agreements will be reached between the parties, whereby the

claim owner may accept with conditions or decline the proposal of exploration work

to be undertaken on their mining claim or parts of it. The aim of this should be to

promote harmonious co-existence of the EPL works and existing small-scale mining

activities.

18. Gerson Tjiho All these people along the road had settled around

this hill. Settling along the road came around Jesaya

Nyamu and Andimba Ya Toivo’s time we

approached them to get us a buyer (some

American man called Chris). He took about 400

people with their IDs. Jeremiah mining behind the

man’s house chased people off the farm saying the

will build toilets and upgrade the land. Some were

driven off the land by gun. We are afraid that the

same thing will happen. Complaints were sent to the

Well noted. We will try to address this issue in the environmental report to ensure that

future similar issues do not occur between the EPL owner and you as mining claim

owners or the NIMA itself.

Since you are now operating under the registered body (NIMA) you are now in a

good position (stand a good ground) to express your concerns and get answers

fairly. Collective community concerns can be drafted on one letter (on NIMA

letterhead) and submitted to the relevant recipient and get answers/clarification to

your queries or express your dissatisfaction on related project matters that affect

your community.



Communication


ministry and deputy minister but only the Founding

President Sam Nujoma listened and solved the issue.

APPENDIX J: Comments, Issues and Concerns as received from some of the I&APs on the proposed exploration activities

Draft ESA Report Circulation email proof to pre-identified I&APs: EPL 7008

EA

SY

BO

X

WA

YB

ILL

C

US

TO

ME

R C

AR

E

TO

LL

F

RE

E N

UM

BE

R

08

00

44

4 4

44

PO

BO

X 287, W

IND

HO

EK

, NA

MIB

IA,T

EL

: 08

00

44

4 4

44

, FAX

: (00

26

4)

61-228988 E

-MA

IL:

parc

elc

olle

ctio

n@

nam

po

st.co

m.n

a W

EB

SIT

E:

ww

w.n

am

po

st.co

m.n

a

VA

T R

EG

. NO

. O0

24

45

10155

nam

po

st

FROM

MA

VIGILTTiM

CAL SU

to- T

O

L)BIL. KG

A.A

MA

LAA

SZL LULA

cOMPANY: l.

**

**

**

**

*

**

**

**

*

--*************

KIK

A

ADDRESS: IL

AL

Ay D

iinE

CITY

/TOW

N

CITY/TO

WN

: K

A1

. -- -

--

---- -

--

--------

TE

L N

O

CO

NT

AC

T M

S M<C

I A

TE

L N

O:

No

rmal R

ate

s will apply if m

aximum

weight is exceeded

NO

P

KG

S

NA

TU

RE

O

F P

AC

KIN

G

BO

X N

O.

4 5

6 7

3 ---.

LL 8

EB

O0

18

91

6IN

SU

RE

D

THIS C

ON

SIGN

MEN

T IS INSU

RED

TO A

MA

XIM

UM

OF N

S 50. IF YO

u If you reaquire additional cover, in

sert the insured am

ou

nt required in the b

lock

Insu

rahce co

ver w

ill be arrang

ed

DO NOT COMPLETE BLOCK YOU ARE ONLY COVERED FOR NS 50. A

MO

UN

T

at 2% for item

s with value under N$5 O

00 and 4% for items w

ith value above NS5 O

00.00. VAT EXCLUSIVVE

SIG

NE

D O

N B

EH

AL

F O

F CA

RRIER|| C

ON

SIG

NE

E's

DE

CL

AR

AT

ION

T

he sh

ipp

er certifies th

at th

e particulars

on

the face hereof are correct and requests carier to

re

ceiv

e a

nd

forw

ard

the a

bo

ve m

en

tion

ed

carg

o to

said

destin

atio

n a

nd

deliv

er it to

the c

on

sig

n-

ee

in acco

rdan

ce

with

th

e stan

derd

tra

din

g c

on

ditio

nso

f th

e

carrie

rM

axim

um

liability

(insu

rance)

is N$50.00.

CO

iNS

, CA

SH

, O

R C

AS

H E

QU

IVA

LE

NT

ON

OW

NE

RS

RIS

K.

TH

E C

OM

PA

NY

WIL

L N

OT

BE

LIA

BL

E F

OR

DA

MA

GE

T

GO

OD

S W

HIC

H A

RE

NO

T

PA

CK

ED

AC

CO

RD

ING

TO

MA

NU

FA

CT

UR

ER

's SPECIFICATION

AC

CE

PT

TH

AT

TH

E G

OO

DS

HA

VE

BE

EN

RE

CE

IVE

D IN

G

OO

D O

RD

ER

AN

D C

ON

DIT

ION

AN

D IN

AC

CO

RD

AN

CE

W

ITH

TH

E S

TA

ND

AR

DT

RA

DIN

GC

ON

DIT

ION

S

SIG

NA

TU

RE

SIGN

AT

UR

EN

AM

E (PLEA

SEPR

INT)

SIGNATURË OF SEN

DER OR

DU

LY

AU

TH

OR

ISE

DR

EP

RE

SE

NT

AT

IVE

----

-----..

******pRINTNAME

NA

ME

PIEA

B

.

TIM

E

**

**

**

*

DA

TE

*****

1 ATE

***TIME

**

**

****ares*TIME

WRITTEN

NOTICE OF DA

MA

GR

IM

A

E O

NS

IEE

RS O

RECEIPT OF G

OO

Os, FAILING W

HICH O

CLAIN wILL DE C

O

**

**

**

**

**

*

.-

+ecpd---************** :****DATE

DA

APPENDIX D - EIS

Documents

Transcript of APPENDIX D - EIS