Annexure-I TOR and Its Compliance - Gujarat Pollution ...

176
Annexure-I TOR and Its Compliance

Transcript of Annexure-I TOR and Its Compliance - Gujarat Pollution ...

Annexure-I TOR and Its Compliance

No.J-11011/288/2020-IA.II(I)

Goverment of India

Minister of Enviroment,Forest and Climate Change

Impact Assessment Division

***

Indira Paryavaran Bhavan,

Vayu Wing,3rd Floor,Aliganj,

Jor Bagh Road,New Delhi-110003

22 Dec 2020

To,

         M/s HINDUSTAN ZINC LIMITED, GIDC DOSWADA PROJECT

         Yashad Bhavan,

         Udaipur-313004

         Rajasthan

Tel.No.-; Email:[email protected]

Sir/Madam,

                      This has reference to the proposal submitted in the Ministry of Environment, Forest

and Climate Change to prescribe the Terms of Reference (TOR) for undertaking detailed EIA

study for the purpose of obtaining Environmental Clearance in accordance with the provisions of

the EIA Notification, 2006. For this purpose, the proponent had submitted online information in the

prescribed format (Form-1 ) along with a Pre-feasibility Report. The details of the proposal are

given below:

1. Proposal No.:                              IA/GJ/IND/176971/2020

2. Name of the Proposal:              

The Proposed zinc smelter complex (1x0.35

MTPA zinc smelter along with fumer plant),

2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW

WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh,

District Tapi, Gujarat

3. Category of the Proposal:         Industrial Projects - 1

4. Project/Activity applied for: 3(a) Metallurgical industries (ferrous & non

ferrous)

5. Date of submission for TOR:      14 Dec 2020

In this regard, under the provisions of the EIA Notification 2006 as amended, the Standard TOR

for the purpose of preparing environment impact assessment report and environment

management plan for obtaining prior environment clearance is prescribed with public consultation

as follows:

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FOR PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

3(a):STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTINGENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY FORMETALLURGICAL INDUSTRIES (FERROUS & NON FERROUS)PROJECTS AND INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN EIA/EMPREPORT

A. STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR)

1) Executive Summary

2) Introduction

i. Details of the EIA Consultant including NABET accreditation

ii. Information about the project proponent

iii. Importance and benefits of the project

3) Project Description

i. Cost of project and time of completion.

ii. Products with capacities for the proposed project.

iii. If expansion project, details of existing products with capacities and whether adequate landis available for expansion, reference of earlier EC if any.

iv. List of raw materials required and their source along with mode of transportation.

v. Other chemicals and materials required with quantities and storage capacities

vi. Details of Emission, effluents, hazardous waste generation and their management.

vii. Requirement of water, power, with source of supply, status of approval, water balance diagram,man-power requirement (regular and contract)

viii. Process description along with major equipments and machineries, process flow sheet(quantative) from raw material to products to be provided

ix. Hazard identification and details of proposed safety systems.

x. Expansion/modernization proposals:

a. Copy of all the Environmental Clearance(s) including Amendments thereto obtained forthe project from MOEF/SEIAA shall be attached as an Annexure. A certified copy of thelatest Monitoring Report of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment and Forestsas per circular dated 30th May, 2012 on the status of compliance of conditions stipulatedin all the existing environmental clearances including Amendments shall be provided. Inaddition, status of compliance of Consent to Operate for the ongoing Iexisting operationof the project from SPCB shall be attached with the EIA-EMP report.

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FORPROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

b. In case the existing project has not obtained environmental clearance, reasons for nottaking EC under the provisions of the EIA Notification 1994 and/or EIA Notification2006 shall be provided. Copies of Consent to Establish/No Objection Certificate andConsent to Operate (in case of units operating prior to EIA Notification 2006, CTE andCTO of FY 2005-2006) obtained from the SPCB shall be submitted. Further, compliancereport to the conditions of consents from the SPCB shall be submitted.

4) Site Details

i. Location of the project site covering village, Taluka/Tehsil, District and State, Justificationfor selecting the site, whether other sites were considered.

ii. A toposheet of the study area of radius of 10km and site location on 1:50,000/1:25,000 scaleon an A3/A2 sheet. (including all eco-sensitive areas and environmentally sensitive places)

iii. Details w.r.t. option analysis for selection of site

iv. Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four corners of the site.

v. Google map-Earth downloaded of the project site.

vi. Layout maps indicating existing unit as well as proposed unit indicating storage area, plantarea, greenbelt area, utilities etc. If located within an Industrial area/Estate/Complex, layoutof Industrial Area indicating location of unit within the Industrial area/Estate.

vii. Photographs of the proposed and existing (if applicable) plant site. If existing, showphotographs of plantation/greenbelt, in particular.

viii. Landuse break-up of total land of the project site (identified and acquired), government/private - agricultural, forest, wasteland, water bodies, settlements, etc shall be included. (notrequired for industrial area)

ix. A list of major industries with name and type within study area (10km radius) shall beincorporated. Land use details of the study area

x. Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area shall be included.

xi. Details of Drainage of the project upto 5km radius of study area. If the site is within 1 kmradius of any major river, peak and lean season river discharge as well as flood occurrencefrequency based on peak rainfall data of the past 30 years. Details of Flood Level of theproject site and maximum Flood Level of the river shall also be provided. (mega green fieldprojects)

xii. Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is not complete, stage of the acquisition processand expected time of complete possession of the land.

xiii. R&R details in respect of land in line with state Government policy

5) Forest and wildlife related issues (if applicable):

i. Permission and approval for the use of forest land (forestry clearance), if any, andrecommendations of the State Forest Department. (if applicable)

ii. Landuse map based on High resolution satellite imagery (GPS) of the proposed site delineatingthe forestland (in case of projects involving forest land more than 40 ha)

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FOR PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

iii. Status of Application submitted for obtaining the stage I forestry clearance along with lateststatus shall be submitted.

iv. The projects to be located within 10 km of the National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves,Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, the project proponent shall submit the map dulyauthenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden showing these features vis-à-vis the project locationand the recommendations or comments of the Chief Wildlife Warden-thereon

v. Wildlife Conservation Plan duly authenticated by the Chief Wildlife Warden of the StateGovernment for conservation of Schedule I fauna, if any exists in the study area

vi. Copy of application submitted for clearance under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, to theStanding Committee of the National Board for Wildlife

6) Environmental Status

i. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and directionand rainfall.

ii. AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX, CO and otherparameters relevant to the project shall be collected. The monitoring stations shall be basedCPCB guidelines and take into account the pre-dominant wind direction, population zoneand sensitive receptors including reserved forests.

iii. Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 weeks of all stations as per frequency given in theNAQQM Notification of Nov. 2009 along with - min., max., average and 98% values foreach of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations should be provided as an annexureto the EIA Report.

iv. Surface water quality of nearby River (100m upstream and downstream of discharge point)and other surface drains at eight locations as per CPCB/MoEF&CC guidelines.

v. Whether the site falls near to polluted stretch of river identified by the CPCB/MoEF&CC, ifyes give details.

vi. Ground water monitoring at minimum at 8 locations shall be included.

vii. Noise levels monitoring at 8 locations within the study area.

viii. Soil Characteristic as per CPCB guidelines.

ix. Traffic study of the area, type of vehicles, frequency of vehicles for transportation of materials,additional traffic due to proposed project, parking arrangement etc.

x. Detailed description of flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) existing in the study areashall be given with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species. If Schedule-I fauna are found within the study area, a Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be prepared andfurnished.

xi. Socio-economic status of the study area.

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FORPROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

7) Impact and Environment Management Plan

i. Assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based onsite-specific meteorological features. In case the project is located on a hilly terrain, theAQIP Modelling shall be done using inputs of the specific terrain characteristics fordetermining the potential impacts of the project on the AAQ. Cumulative impact of all sourcesof emissions (including transportation) on the AAQ of the area shall be assessed. Details ofthe model used and the input data used for modelling shall also be provided. The air qualitycontours shall be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site, habitationnearby, sensitive receptors, if any.

ii. Water Quality modelling - in case of discharge in water body

iii. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environmentshall be assessed and provided. In this regard, options for transport of raw materials andfinished products and wastes (large quantities) by rail or rail-cum road transport or conveyor-cum-rail transport shall be examined.

iv. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plant operations, extent recycled and reusedfor different purposes shall be included. Complete scheme of effluent treatment. Characteristicsof untreated and treated effluent to meet the prescribed standards of discharge under E(P)Rules.

v. Details of stack emission and action plan for control of emissions to meet standards.

vi. Measures for fugitive emission control

vii. Details of hazardous waste generation and their storage, utilization and management. Copiesof MOU regarding utilization of solid and hazardous waste in cement plant shall also beincluded. EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recovertechniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation.

viii. Proper utilization of fly ash shall be ensured as per Fly Ash Notification, 2009. A detailedplan of action shall be provided.

ix. Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less than1,500 trees per ha. Giving details of species, width of plantation, planning schedule etc. shallbe included. The green belt shall be around the project boundary and a scheme for greeningof the roads used for the project shall also be incorporated.

x. Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site shall be submitted to harvestrainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also touse for the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water and reduce the waterrequirement from other sources.

xi. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measuresshall be included.

xii. Action plan for post-project environmental monitoring shall be submitted.

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FOR PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

xiii. Onsite and Offsite Disaster (natural and Man-made) Preparedness and Emergency ManagementPlan including Risk Assessment and damage control. Disaster management plan should belinked with District Disaster Management Plan.

8) Occupational health

i. Plan and fund allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and casualworkers

ii. Details of exposure specific health status evaluation of worker. If the workers' health is beingevaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far& Near vision, colour vision and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement andperiodical examinations give the details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzeddata of above mentioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and departmentwise.

iii. Details of existing Occupational & Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of hazardsand whether they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL,what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of the workerscan be preserved,

iv. Annual report of heath status of workers with special reference to Occupational Health andSafety.

9) Corporate Environment Policy

i. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board ofDirectors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

ii. Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process / procedures to bringinto focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms /conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.

iii. What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with theenvironmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental clearanceconditions? Details of this system may be given.

iv. Does the company have system of reporting of non compliances / violations of environmentalnorms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or stakeholders atlarge? This reporting mechanism shall be detailed in the EIA report

10) Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to thelabour force during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers duringoperation phase.

11) Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC)

i. Adequate funds (at least 2.5 % of the project cost) shall be earmarked towards the EnterpriseSocial Commitment based on Public Hearing issues and item-wise details along with time

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FORPROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

bound action plan shall be included. Socio-economic development activities need to beelaborated upon.

12) Any litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any Court of Lawagainst the project, if so, details thereof shall also be included. Has the unit received any noticeunder the Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of Air and WaterActs? If so, details thereof and compliance/ATR to the notice(s) and present status of the case.

13) 'A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TOR.

B. SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR EIASTUDIES FORMETALLURGICAL INDUSTRIES (FERROUS & NON FERROUS)

1) Complete process flow diagram describing each unit, its processes and operations, along with materialand energy inputs & outputs (material and energy balance).

2) Details on blast furnace/ open hearth furnace/ basic oxygen furnace/ladle refining, casting androlling plants etc.

3) Details on installation/activation of opacity meters with recording with proper calibration system

4) Details on toxic metals including mercury, arsenic and fluoride emissions

5) Details on stack height requirement for integrated steel

6) Details on ash disposal and management -Non-ferrous metal

7) Complete process flow diagram describing production of lead/zinc/copper/ aluminium, etc.

8) Raw materials substitution or elimination

9) Details on smelting, thermal refining, melting, slag fuming, and Waelz kiln operation

10) Details on Holding and de-gassing of molten metal from primary and secondary aluminum, materialspre-treatment, and from melting and smelting of secondary aluminium

11) Details on solvent recycling

12) Details on precious metals recovery

13) Details on composition, generation and utilization of waste/fuel gases from coke oven plant andtheir utilization.

14) Details on toxic metal content in the waste material and its composition and end use (particularly ofslag).

15) Trace metals Mercury, arsenic and fluoride emissions in the raw material.

16) Trace metals in waste material especially slag.

17) Plan for trace metal recovery

18) Trace metals in water

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FOR PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

C. ADDITIONAL TOR FOR INTEGRATED STEEL PLANT

1). Iron ore/coal linkage documents along with the status of environmental clearance of iron ore andcoal mines

2). Quantum of production of coal and iron ore from coal & iron ore mines and the projects they caterto. Mode of transportation to the plant and its impact

3). For Large ISPs, a 3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in 10 km radius fromthe proposal site. MRL details of project site and RL of nearby sources of water shall be indicated.

4). Recent land-use map based on satellite imagery. High-resolution satellite image data having 1m-5mspatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos, IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10 Km radius area fromproposed site. The same shall be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.

5). Respirable Suspended particulate matter (RSPM) present in the ambient air must be analysed forsource analysis - natural dust/RSPM generated from plant operations (trace elements). The RSPMshall also be analysed for presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene solublefraction, where applicable. Chemical characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.

6). All stock piles will have to be on top of a stable liner to avoid leaching of materials to ground water.

7). Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made for the steel plants in the CREP guidelines.

8). Plan for slag utilization

9). Plan for utilization of energy in off gases (coke oven, blast furnace)

10). System of coke quenching adopted with justification.

***

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-1

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Standard TOR

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

Standard TOR 1) Executive Summary Enclosed in EIA report separately. 2) Introduction

i) Details of the EIA Consultant including NABET accreditation

Vimta Labs Limited, Hyderabad, an accredited agency with Quality Council of India (QCI) / National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) vide registered no. NABET/EIA/1720/SA 088 dated 16.02.2021. Details of EIA consultant are given in Chapter-12.

ii) Information about the project proponent

M/s. Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) is one of the largest Lead-Zinc integrated producer & a Leading producer of silver with more than 50 years of experience in Mining & Smelting. Reserves & Resources of about 403 MT as on 31st March 2020 sufficient for more than 25 years of mine life. Total metal production capacity is 890,000 MT of zinc and 205,000 MT of lead. Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects on waste heat recovery & wind power have an annual Certified Emission Reduction potential of over 7,30,955 TPA of CO2. Total Exchequer to Government during 2019-20 was Rs. 9150 Crores, including royalty, taxes and dividend. Information about the project proponent is given in Section-1.2.2 of Chapter-1.

iii) Importance and benefits of the project

Zinc is a very versatile non-ferrous metal. Zinc’s different applications rank it as the 4th most common metal in use after iron, aluminum and copper. Zinc consumption is forecast to grow at a compound average annual rate of ~2% p.a. globally in FY2021-2030. The present production capacities of zinc in India are sufficient to meet the domestic requirements. However, the demand for zinc in India is expected to grow at a 7.1% which makes it viable for the proposed zinc smelter project production capacities. Further, the deficit in international market during the upcoming years provides opportunity for export. Benefits: The investment in the new Zinc Smelter Plant project will accelerate the economic and industrial development of the state and generating direct and indirect employment to the tune of 5000 people. The project will help in setting up any ancillary facilities in and around it which will provide the spin of benefits to the economy and will help livelihood around 50, 000 people.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-2

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

The works like transportation, greenbelt development, housekeeping etc. are out sourced and local eligible population is given the preference in awarding the job. The project contributes in improvement of economic status of the people in the area.

3) Project Description i) Cost of project and time of

completion The capital cost of the proposed plant is about Rs. 5000 crores.

The proposed project construction activities will start after obtaining all necessary statutory clearances from concern authorities and construction will be completed within 36 months.

ii) Products with capacities for the proposed project

HZL has proposed to set up one of the State of the Art Zinc Smelter Complex with proposed capacity of 1x0.35 MTPA of Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant, 2X90 MW of Captive Power Plant (CPP) and 35 MW Waste Heat Recovery Boiler (WHRB) at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat. Details of plant capacity of the products and by-products is provided in following table:

Unit Proposed Capacity

Zinc Smelter 3,50,000 TPA

Captive Power Plant 2X90 MW and 35 MW of WHRB

Fumer Plant Associated with Zinc Smelter

PRODUCTS UOM QUANTITY

SHG Zinc Cathode/Ingot (Special High Grade)

TPA 350000

Zinc (Continuous Galvanizing Grade)/ Zinc Alloys/ Zinc Compounds (out of 350000 TPA)

TPA 100000

Power (Thermal) MW 2X90

DG Sets (Emergency) MW 20

BY-PRODUCTS (TPA)

Sulphuric Acid TPA 664000

Zinc Oxide Compound TPA 80500

Copper as Copper Sulphate/ Chloride/ Matte/ Compound (equivalent metal)

TPA 1000

Granulated Fumer Slag TPA 210000

Cadmium Metal / Sponge (equivalent metal)

TPA 1200

Fly Ash/ Bottom Ash TPA 420845

Cobalt as Cobalt oxide/compound (equivalent metal)

TPA 50

Nickel TPA 30

Germanium TPA 25

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-3

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

Lead – Silver Compound TPA 18900

Calomel TPA 44

Waste Heat Power MW 35

Sodium Sulphate TPA 3000

Sodium Chloride TPA 750

The above details are given in Table-2.8 of Chapter-

2. iii) If expansion project, details of

existing products with capacities and whether adequate land is available for expansion, reference of earlier EC if any

No. It’s a greenfield project.

iv) List of raw materials required and their source along with mode of transportation

Raw material Quantity Proposed

(TPA)

Source-Imported

(Im), Indigenous

(In)

Mode of Transportation

Zinc Concentrate

7,00,000 70% (Im); 30% (In)

Rail/Road

Zinc Secondaries (Dross/ Ash/ Other Zinc bearing wastes)

50,000 100% (In) Road

Aluminium Metal

1000 100% (In) Road

Coal for Power Plant

11,37,000 70% (Im); 30% (In)

Rail/Road

Coal for Fumer Plant

1,96,000 70% (Im); 30% (In)

Rail/Road

The above details are given in Table-2.3 of Chapter-

2.

v) Other chemicals and materials required with quantities and storage capacities

Other chemicals and materials required with quantities and storage capacities is given Table-7.8 of Chapter-

7.

vi) Details of Emission, effluents,

hazardous waste generation and their management

State-of-the art air pollution control devices like Double Conversion Double Absorption (DCDA) based Sulphuric Acid Plant followed by Tail Gas Treatment (TGT) Plant, Eight Field ESP, Flue Gas Desulphurization (FGD) and NOx Control Solutions in Captive Power Plant, bag filters, adequate stacks height and greenbelt development are proposed to minimize the emission impact. The wastewater will be generated from blow down, cooling towers, DM plant and service water tank in the plant. Besides, domestic wastewater from canteen and employees wash area will be generated. All the effluents generated in the project will be treated and reused in the process and greenbelt. The plant will operate on zero

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-4

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

effluent discharge principle. Adopting environment friendly technology & equipment and working on reduction of pollution load of hazardous solid waste i.e. Jarosite by setting fumer plant. The major solid waste generated in the plant will be sent to authorized re-processors. Details of emission, effluents, hazardous waste generation and their management is given in Section-

2.4.2, Section-2.4.3 and Table-2.12, Table-2.13 of Chapter-2 and Chapter-4.

vii) Requirement of water, power, with source of supply, status of approval, water balance diagram, man-power requirement (regular and contract)

The total requirement of water for plant is 46,070 KLD. Fresh water requirement of 35 MLD during operational phase will be met from Ukai Dam through pipeline. Water allocation request to Water Resources department is given in Annexure-VI. Water balance diagram is given in Figure-2.2 The estimated total power requirement for the proposed zinc smelter complex is 215 MW, which will be met from 180 MW (2 x 90 MW) of coal based Captive Power Plant/GUVNL (GUJARAT Urja Vikas Nigam Limited). Further, Waste Heat Recovery Plant of 35 MW is envisaged for providing power to proposed zinc smelter complex. Installation of DG sets of 20 MW are proposed for emergency purpose for project. About 3100 nos (100-Direct + 3000 Indirect) of manpower for construction phase and 1900 nos (1650 – Direct and 250 - Indirect) will be employed directly and indirectly during the construction and operation phases of the proposed Zinc smelter complex.

viii) Process description along with major equipment and machineries, process flow sheet (Quantitative) from raw material to products to be provided

The major equipments in the process are Roasting plant, Sulphuric acid plant, Calcine Leaching & Purification Plant, Zinc Electrolysis, Casting Unit, Zinc Dust/Powder Plant, Dross Milling Plant, Minor metals Plant, Captive Power plant, WHRB plants. Detailed process description is given in section-2.3 of Chapter-

2. The process flow sheet of roaster plant, Gas Cleaning Plant, acid plant, Leaching process, Fumer plant, Purification plant, Cell house, Melting and Casting, Zinc smelter and fumer plant is given in Figure-2.6,

Figure-2.7, Figure-2.8, Figure-2.9, Figure-2.10,

Figure-2.11, Figure-2.12, Figure-2.13, Figure-2.14 of Chapter-2.

ix) Hazard identification and details of proposed safety systems

A detailed section Hazard identification and details of proposed safety systems is given in Chapter-7.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-5

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

x) Expansion/modernization proposals:

The present proposal is a greenfield project with the State of the Art Zinc Smelter Complex with proposed capacity of 1x0.35 MTPA of Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant, 2X90 MW of Captive Power Plant (CPP) and 35 MW Waste Heat Recovery Boiler (WHRB).

a) Copy of all the Environmental Clearance(s) including Amendments thereto obtained for the project from MoEF&CC/SEIAA shall be attached as an Annexure. A certified copy of the latest Monitoring Report of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change as per circular dated 30th May, 2012 on the status of compliance of conditions stipulated in all the existing environmental clearances including Amendments shall be provided. In addition, status of compliance of Consent to Operate for the ongoing /existing operation of the project from SPCB/PCC shall be attached with the EIA-EMP report

All the statutory requirements viz. Environmental Clearance, Consent To Establish (CTE), Consent to Operate (CTO) will be obtained by HZL before starting the project.

b) In case the existing project has not obtained environmental clearance, reasons for not taking EC under the provisions of the EIA Notification 1994 and/or EIA Notification 2006 shall be provided. Copies of Consent to Establish/No Objection Certificate and Consent to Operate (in case of units operating prior to EIA Notification 2006, CTE and CTO of FY 2005-2006) obtained from the SPCB shall be submitted. Further, compliance report to the conditions of consents from the SPCB shall be submitted

This is a Greenfield project, and all necessary approval will be obtained before commissioning of the project.

4 Site Details i) Location of the project site

covering village, Taluka/Tehsil, District and State, Justification for selecting the site, whether

The proposed project site is located in Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) area at Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi in the state of Gujarat.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-6

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

other sites were considered. The location map and study area of 10 km radius of the project site is shown in Figure-1.1 and Figure-1.2 respectively. Google imagery of the study area and the proposed site photographs are shown in Figure-1.3 and Figure-1.4 in the Chapter-1. Justification for selecting the site for the proposed Zinc smelter plant the details are given in Chapter-5. Alternative sites were not considered, as land for the proposed project is already in possession.

ii) A toposheet of the study area of radius of 10 km and site location on 1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet. (including all eco-sensitive areas and environmentally sensitive places)

Study area map covering a distance of 10 km radius from the plant boundary using the latest satellite image is given in Figure-1.2 of Chapter-1.

iii) Details w.r.t. option analysis for selection of site

Justification for selecting the site for the proposed Zinc smelter plant the details are given in Chapter-5. Alternative sites were not considered, as land for the proposed project is already in possession.

iv) Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four corners of the site.

Co-ordinates:

A) 21°8’48.86”N, 73°31’5.09”E B) 21°9’4.21”N, 73°31’37.25”E C) 21°7’56.10”N, 73°31’4.13”E D) 21°7’57.56”N, 73°31’28.66”E E) 21°8’19.83”N, 73°31’44.58”E

v) Google map-Earth downloaded

of the project site.

Google map of the project site is given in Figure-1.3 of Chapter-1.

vi) Layout maps indicating existing unit as well as proposed unit indicating storage area, plant area, greenbelt area, utilities etc. If located within an Industrial area/Estate/Complex, layout of Industrial Area indicating location of unit within the Industrial area/Estate.

Layout map indicating existing infrastructure as well as proposed unit indicating storage area, plant area, greenbelt area, utilities etc is given in Figure-2.1 of Chapter-2.

vii) Photographs of the proposed and existing (if applicable) plant site. If existing, show photographs of plantation/greenbelt, in particular

Photographs of the proposed and existing infrastructure site is given in Figure-1.3 and Figure-1.4 of Chapter-

1.

viii) Landuse break-up of total land The project is proposed to be installed in ~165.60 ha of

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-7

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

of the project site (identified and acquired), government / private - agricultural, forest, wasteland, water bodies, settlements, etc shall be included. (not required for industrial area)

industrial area, allotted by Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) on 16th February 1995 to Sterlite Communication/Paper at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat. Landuse break-up of total land of the project site is given in Table-2.2 of Chapter-2.

ix) A list of major industries with name and type within study area (10km radius) shall be incorporated. Land use details of the study area

A list of major industries within study area (10 km radius) are as follows: • Girnar Stone Quarry-Songadh (2.0 km, NE) • Vijay Stone Quarry-Songadh (3.1 km, NE) • Ukai Thermal Power Station (6.6 km, NE) • JK Paper Mills, Songadh (7.4 km, NE)

A detailed land use details of the study area with satellite imagery is given in Section-3.3 of Chapter-3.

x) Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area shall be included

The details of the Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are given in Section-3.2 of Chapter-3. Detailed hydrogeology report is given as Annexure-

XII.

xi) Details of Drainage of the

project upto 5km radius of study area. If the site is within 1 km radius of any major river, peak and lean season river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency based on peak rainfall data of the past 30 years. Details of Flood Level of the project site and maximum Flood Level of the river shall also be provided. (mega green field projects)

Drainage map of the study area is given in Figure-

3.2.1. The nearest river is Mindhola or Madav River Dam at a distance of 0.3 km, S. The detailed study on Hydrogeology includes the drainage pattern and flood levels of project site. Detailed hydrogeology report is given as Annexure-

XII.

xii) Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is not complete, stage of the acquisition process and expected time of complete possession of the land

The project is proposed to be installed in ~165.60 ha of industrial area, allotted by Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) on 16th February 1995 to Sterlite Communication/Paper at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat. Sterlite Communication/Paper is in the possession of land and a MoU between Sterlite Communication/Paper and Hindustan Zinc Limited has been signed for the utilization of 165.60 ha. The signed copy of the MOU is given in Annexure-V.

xiii) R&R details in respect of land in line with state Government

No Resettlement and Rehabilitation(R&R) involved in this project.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-8

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

policy 5 Forest and wildlife related

issues (if applicable): Not applicable.

i) Permission and approval for the use of forest land (forestry clearance), if any, and recommendations of the State Forest Department. (if applicable).

No forestland is involved in the proposed project site.

ii) Land use map based on High resolution satellite imagery (GPS) of the proposed site delineating the forestland (in

case of projects involving forest

land more than 40 ha).

No forestland is involved in the proposed project site. High resolution satellite imagery (GPS) of the proposed site is given in Figure-3.3.1. of Chapter-3.

iii) Status of Application submitted for obtaining the stage I forestry clearance along with latest status shall be submitted.

Not Applicable.

iv) The projects to be located within 10 km of the National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, the project proponent shall submit the map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden showing these features vis-à-vis the project location and the recommendations or comments of the Chief Wildlife Warden-thereon.

Not Applicable.

v) Wildlife Conservation Plan duly authenticated by the Chief Wildlife Warden of the State Government for conservation of Schedule-I fauna, if any exists in the study area.

Not Applicable.

vi) Copy of application submitted for clearance under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, to the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife

Not applicable.

6 Environmental Status i) Determination of atmospheric

inversion level at the project site and site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction

Analysis of the data obtained during the study period shows that inversion height varies from a minimum of 68m to maximum of 256m during the study period. The averaged inversion level under stable ABL conditions (1800-0600 hours) is seen to be 155±51m during the study period.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-9

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

and rainfall. The hourly averaged mixing height pertaining to unstable ABL during the day time (0900-1800 hours) is seen to vary from a minimum of 510m to a maximum of 1380m. The average level is seen to be 981±254m during the study period. Sodar study report is given in Annexure-XI. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall has been carried out and given in Section-3.5 of Chapter-3.

ii) AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX, CO and other parameters relevant to the project shall be collected. The monitoring stations shall be based CPCB guidelines and take into account the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests

AAQ data in winter season at 10 locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX, CO and other parameters were monitored and analysis results are given in Table 3.6.2 of Chapter-3 and detailed levels are given in Annexure-VIII. The monitoring stations are fixed based on the CPCB guidelines by taking into account the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests as given in Figure-3.6.2.

iii) Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 weeks of all stations as per frequency given in the NAQQM Notification of Nov. 2009 along with – min., max., average and 98% values for each of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations should be provided as an annexure to the EIA Report

Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 weeks of all stations as per frequency given in the NAQQM Notification of Nov. 2009 along with – min., max., average and 98% values for each of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations have been followed and given in Table 3.6.2 of Chapter-3 and detailed levels are given in Annexure-VIII.

iv) Surface water quality of nearby River (60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface drains at eight locations as per CPCB/MoEF&CC guidelines

Surface water quality of nearby River (60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface drains at five locations as per CPCB/MoEF&CC guidelines are given in Table-3.7.2 of Chapter-3 and shown in Figure-

3.7.2(A), Figure-3.7.2(B).

v) Whether the site falls near to polluted stretch of river identified by the CPCB/MoEF&CC.

Not applicable.

vi) Ground water monitoring at minimum at 8 locations shall be included

Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations are given in Table-3.7.3 of Chapter-3 and shown in

Figure-3.7.2(A), Figure-3.7.2(B). vii) Noise levels monitoring at 8

locations within the study area Noise levels monitoring at 10 locations within the study area have been monitored and given in Table-3.8.3 and shown in Figure-3.8.2(A), Figure-3.8.2(B) of Chapter-3.

viii) Soil Characteristic as per CPCB guidelines

Soil Characteristic as per CPCB guidelines have been monitored in 10 locations and results are given in

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-10

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

Table-3.4.4 & shown in Figure-3.4.2(A), Figure-

3.4.2(B), Figure-3.4.2(C) of Chapter-3. ix) Traffic study of the area, type

of vehicles, frequency of vehicles for transportation of materials, additional traffic due to proposed project, parking arrangement etc.

Details of traffic study of the area for the proposed project are discussed in Section-3.11 of Chapter-3.

x) Detailed description of flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) existing in the study area shall be given with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species. If Schedule-I fauna are found within the study area, a Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be prepared and furnished

Detailed description of flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) existing in the study area are given in Section-3.9 of Chapter-3. There were no schedule I fauna found within te study area.

xi) Socio-economic status of the study area

The population reported as per the 2011 census is 1,45,425. Total work participation in the project study areas is 55.30% and the non-workers constitute 44.70% of the total population respectively. Socio-economic status of the study area is detailed in Section-3.10 of Chapter-3.

7 Impact Assessment and Environment Management Plan

i) Assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological features. In case the project is located on a hilly terrain, the AQIP Modelling shall be done using inputs of the specific terrain characteristics for determining the potential impacts of the project on the AAQ. Cumulative impact of all sources of emissions (including transportation) on the AAQ of the area shall be well assessed. Details of the model used and the input data used for modelling shall also be provided. The air quality contours shall be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site,

Ambient air quality modeling using AERMOD has been given in Section-4.2.4 of Chapter -4.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-11

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any.

ii) Water Quality modelling – in case, if the effluent is proposed to be discharged in to the local drain, then Water Quality Modelling study should be conducted for the drain water taking into consideration the upstream and downstream quality of water of the drain.

The proposed plant will follow the zero effluent discharge by recycling and reusing the treated water within the plant premises.

iii) Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment shall be assessed and provided. In this regard, options for transport of raw materials and finished products and wastes (large quantities) by rail or rail-cum road transport or conveyor-cum-rail transport shall be examined

The traffic due to the project mainly includes vehicles/trucks, which are used to transport raw materials, finished products/ by-products and wastes. The predictions of traffic volume incremental concentrations due to additional traffic are estimated by line source modelling as given in attached as Section-

4.2.3.1 of Chapter-4.

iv) A note on treatment of wastewater from different plant operations, extent recycled and reused for different purposes shall be included. Complete scheme of effluent treatment. Characteristics of untreated and treated effluent to meet the prescribed standards of discharge under E(P) Rules.

The wastewater generated is recycled and reused within the plant. The details are given in Section-4.1.4 of Chapter-4. ETP will be in constructed with RO and wastewater from different plant operations will be reused for different process.

Water balance diagram is given in Figure-2.2 of Chapter-2.

v) Details of stack emission and action plan for control of emissions to meet standards.

The details of the stack emissions are given in Table-

4.2 of Chapter-4.

vi) Measures for fugitive emission control

The measures for fugitive emission control in the plant are given in Section-4.2.1 of Chapter-4.

vii) Details of hazardous waste generation and their storage, utilization and disposal. Copies of MOU regarding utilization of solid and hazardous waste shall also be included. EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle / reuse / recover techniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation.

The details of the solid waste generated from the proposed zinc smelter plant are given in Section-4.2.5 of Chapter-4. MOU for the utilization of solid waste is attached in Annexure-VII. The EMP including the concept of waste-minimization, recycle / reuse / recover techniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation is given in section-10.2 of Chapter-10.

viii) Proper utilization of fly ash shall be ensured as per Fly Ash Notification, 2009. A detailed plan of action shall be provided

Fly ash generation from the proposed Zinc smelter plant will be provided to cement industries / brick manufacturers.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-12

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

Fly ash generation details is given in Section-4.2.3.1 of Chapter-4.

ix) Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less than 1,500 trees per ha. Giving details of species, width of plantation, planning schedule etc. shall be included. The greenbelt shall be around the project boundary and a scheme for greening of the roads used for the project shall also be incorporated.

Greenbelt development plan in the proposed plant is 55 acres (33% of total area of 165.6 Ha). The greenbelt shall be around the project boundary and a scheme for greening of the roads used for the project are given in section-4.3 of Chapter-4.

x) Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site shall be submitted to harvest rainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also to use for the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other sources.

HZL will implement rain water harvesting in the proposed project and the details are given in Section-

4.2.4.4. Detailed hydrogeology report is attached as Annexure-XII.

xi) Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures shall be included.

The capital cost of the proposed Zinc smelter plant is about Rs. 5,000 crores. The anticipated capital expenditure for the pollution control measures is about Rs. 740.80 crores and details are given in Section-

6.4.2 of Chapter-6. xii) Action plan for post-project

environmental monitoring shall be submitted

Action plan for post-project environmental monitoring is given in Table-6.2 of Chapter-6.

xiii) Onsite and Offsite Disaster (natural and Man-made) Preparedness and Emergency Management Plan including Risk Assessment and damage control. Disaster management plan should be linked with District Disaster Management Plan

Onsite and Offsite Disaster (natural and Man-made) Preparedness and Emergency Management Plan including Risk Assessment and damage control are given in Section-7.4.3.3 & Section-7.4.4.2 of Chapter-7.

8 Occupational health

i) Details of existing Occupational & Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of above mentioned hazards and whether they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL, what measures the company has adopted to keep

Details of Occupational & Safety Hazards are provided in Section 7.5 of Chapter-7.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-13

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

them within PEL so that health of the workers can be preserved,

ii) Details of exposure specific health status evaluation of worker. If the workers’ health is being evaluated by pre-designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre-placement and periodical examinations give the details of the same. Details regarding last month analysed data of abovementioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department wise.

iii) Annual report of health status of workers with special reference to Occupational Health and Safety.

iv) Plan and fund allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and casual workers

9 Corporate Environment

Policy

i) Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report

Yes, HZL has a well laid down Environmental Policy. The same will be implemented for the proposed project unit also.

ii) Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process / procedures to bring into focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.

Yes.

iii) What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental clearance

The organization chart and HSE policy is given in Figure-10.6 and Figure 10.7 of Chapter-10.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-14

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

conditions? Details of this system may be given.

iv) Does the company have system of reporting of non-compliances / violations of environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism shall be detailed in the EIA report

Yes, Noncompliance, environmental incidents reporting in place. A declaration of Head-HSE is provided to the board about the progress, issues etc. pertaining to environmental management.

10 Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour force during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers during operation phase.

Details of infrastructure facilities are given in Section

10.2 of Chapter-10

11 To address the Public Hearing issues, provisions contained under Ministry’s Office Memorandum vide F.No. 22-65/2017-IA.III dated 30/09/2020 shall be complied.

Will be addressed as per the public hearing issues.

12 Any litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof shall also be included. Has the unit received any notice under the Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of Air and Water Acts? If so, details thereof and compliance/ATR to the notice(s) and present status of the case

No litigations are pending against the proposed project.

13 A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above ToRs

Complied.

14 The ToRs prescribed shall be valid for a period of three years for submission of the EIA/EMP reports along with Public Hearing Proceedings (wherever stipulated).

Agreed.

i) All documents shall be properly indexed, page numbered.

Complied.

ii) Period/date of data collection The baseline studies have been conducted from 1st

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-15

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

shall be clearly indicated. October 2020 to 31st December 2020 (post-monsoon and part winter season).

iii) Authenticated English translation of all material in Regional languages shall be provided

Complied.

iv) The letter/application for environmental clearance shall quote the MOEF&CC file No. and also attach a copy of the letter

Report is being submitted for Public Hearing.

v) The copy of the letter received from the Ministry shall be also attached as an annexure to the final EIA-EMP Report

Being complied.

vi) The index of the final EIA-EMP report must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report

Being complied.

vii) While preparing the EIA report, the instructions for the proponents and instructions for the consultants issued by MOEF&CC vide O.M. No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II (I) dated 4th August, 2009, which are available on the website of this Ministry shall also be followed.

Being complied.

viii) The consultants involved in the preparation of EIA-EMP report after accreditation with Quality Council of India (QCl)/National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (NABET) would need to include a certificate in this regard in the EIA-EMP reports prepared by them and data provided by other organization/ Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. Name of the Consultant and the Accreditation details shall be posted on the EIA-EMP Report as well as on the cover of the Hard Copy of the Presentation material for EC presentation

Details are provided in Chapter-12.

ix) ToRs’ prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) shall be considered for preparation of EIA-EMP report for the project in addition to all

Being complied.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-16

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No. Condition Compliance

the relevant information as per the ‘Generic Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification,2006. Where the documents provided are in a language other than English, an English translation shall be provided. The draft EIA-EMP report shall be submitted to the State Pollution Control Board of the concerned State for conduct of Public Hearing. The SPCB shall conduct the Public Hearing/public consultation, district-wise, as per the provisions of EIA notification, 2006. The Public Hearing shall be chaired by an Officer not below the rank of Additional District Magistrate. The issues raised in the Public Hearing and during the consultation process and the commitments made by the project proponent on the same shall be included separately in EIA-EMP Report in a separate chapter and summarised in a tabular chart with financial budget (capital and revenue) along with time schedule of implementation for complying with the commitments made. The final EIA report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-17

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Specific TOR

Sr. No Term of Reference Compliance

Specific TOR

i) Environment control systems shall be designed to achieve following objectives;

a) SO2 emissions from sulfuric acid plant shall not exceed 0.7 kg/t of acid produced.

In sulfuric acid plant SO2 emissions of 0.7 kg/t of acid production will be maintained.

b) Acid mist release concentration shall not exceed 30 mg/Nm3.

The concentration of Acid mist release from sulphuric acid plant will be maintained less than or equal to 30 mg/Nm3.

c) PM emission from stacks shall not exceed 30 mg/Nm3

From the stacks PM emission will be maintained less than 30 mg/Nm3.

ii) Treated effluent from the plant shall be reused and recycled

Yes, treated effluent from the plant shall be reused and recycled. The plant will operate on zero effluent discharge principle.

iii) 20 m wide green belt around the periphery shall maintained covering 33 % of plant area.

20 m wide green belt around the periphery shall be developed and maintained covering 33% of plant area.

iv) A plan for maximizing the generation of Solar energy shall be developed and incorporated in the EMP.

The following solar energy projects are proposed for the Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat. 1. Installation of Solar LED based

Street Lights 2. Installation of solar lights in

common areas and 3. Solar PV power generation by

installing solar panel, wherever possible, roof top of Admin building, CDSS, etc.

Sr. No.

Description Solar Power

Capex Cost

(Rs. in lacs)

1 Roof Top Solar Capacity

777 kW 295

2 Solar light 50W capacity – 600 nos.

300 kWH 575

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-18

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No Term of Reference Compliance

v) RWH and Recharge details shall be furnished in EIA report.

The annual volume of rainwater available from the project site spread in 165.6 ha is estimated at 10,91,850 m³ (1.09 MCM) and during SW and NE monsoon periods is 10,42,440 m³ (1.04 MCM). The details are given in Section-4.4.4.4 Rainwater Harvesting System of Chapter-4.

vi) EMP for social and infrastructure

development shall be based on the inputs from SIA and PH proceedings.

After conducting the public hearing the EMP for social and infrastructure development will be provided.

vii) Railway siding shall be provided in the plant for movement of materials

Railway siding is to be provided in the proposed plant for movement of materials.

viii) Action plan for 100% solid waste utilization shall be submitted.

To eliminate the generation of Jarosite, the Fumer plant is proposed in this project which will stop producing Jarosite and produce Slag which is gainfully utilized in cement manufacturing & road construction. Fly ash and Gypsum generated from Captive Power Plant will be utilized in cement manufacturing. Bottom ash will be utilized in bricks manufacturing. The solid wastes like Cooler Cake, Spent Catalyst, ETP Cake, Goethite, Deflourination Cake and MEE/MVR Salt etc. will be disposed in Secured Land Fill (SLF) after neutralization and stabilization over 14 acres within the proposed plant area premises. Detailed action plan for solid waste utilisation is given in Section-4.4.5.1.

ix) All plant roads shall be paved and industrial vacuum cleaners shall be used to clean the roads regularly to keep fugitive emission under control.

Plant roads will be paved and industrial vacuum cleaners will be used to clean the roads regularly to keep fugitive emission under control in and around the plant premises.

x) Fugitive emission control plan during construction shall be submitted.

Most of the construction equipment will be mobile, the emissions are likely to be fugitive. The dust generated will also be fugitive in nature, which can be controlled by suitable mitigation measures like sprinkling of water and development of green cover.

ANNEXURE-I

TOR COMPLIANCE

AI-19

Sensitivity: Public (C4)

Sr. No Term of Reference Compliance

xi) PP shall use ultralow NOx burner with three stage combustion, flue gas recirculation and auto combustion control system.

Ultralow NOx burner with three stage combustion, flue gas recirculation and auto combustion control system will be implemented.

xii) The plant shall not be situated on the flood plain of Madav River Dam. Proof of HFL of Madav River Dam shall be provided from irrigation department of the State Government.

The plant is not situated on the flood plain of Madav River Dam. HFL of Madav River Dam from State irrigation department is given in Annexure-VI.

xiii) Detailed Engineering layout drawing shall be furnished

Detailed Engineering layout drawing is given in Figure-2.

Annexure-II Applicable environmental standards

ANNEXURE-II

APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENT STANDARDS

AII-1

ANNEXURE-II

APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENT STANDARDS

AII-2

ANNEXURE-II

APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENT STANDARDS

AII-3

ANNEXURE-II

APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENT STANDARDS

AII-4

ANNEXURE-II

APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENT STANDARDS

AII-5

AMBIENT NOISE STANDARDS

Area Code Category of Area Noise Levels dB(A) eq

Day time* Night Time

A Industrial Area 75 70

B Commercial Area 65 55

C Residential Area 55 45

D Silence Zone** 50 40 Note: - 1. Day time shall mean from 6.00 a.m. to 10.00 p.m.

2. Night time shall mean from 10.00 p.m. to 6.00 a.m.

3. Silence zone is an area comprising not less than 100 metres around hospitals,

educational institutions, courts, religious places or any other area which is declared as

such by the competent authority.

4. Mixed categories of areas may be declared as one of the four above mentioned

categories by the competent authority.

* dB(A) Leq denotes the time weighted average of the level of sound in decibels on scale

A which is relatable to human hearing.

A “decibel” is a unit in which noise is measured.

“A”,in dB(A) Leq, denotes the frequency weighting in the measurement of noise and

corresponds to frequency response characteristics of the human ear.

Leq: It is an energy mean of the noise level over a specified period.

Noise Standards for Occupational Exposure

Noise standards in the work environment are specified by Occupational Safety and

Health Administration (OSHA-USA) which are being enforced by Government of

India through model rules framed under Factories Act. These are given in below

Table.

STANDARDS FOR OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE

Total Time of Exposure per Day in Hours

(Continuous or Short term Exposure)

Sound Pressure Level in dB(A)

8 90

6 92

4 95

3 97

2 100

3/2 102

1 105

¾ 107

½ 110

¼ 115

Never >115

Note:

1. No exposure in excess of 115 dB(A) is to be permitted.

2. For any period of exposure falling in between any figure and the next higher or lower

figure as indicated in column (1), the permissible level is to be determined by

extrapolation on a proportionate scale.

Annexure-III Methodology of Monitoring and analysis

ANNEXURE-III

METHODOLOGY ADOPTED FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

AIII-1

1.0 Meteorology

The methodology adopted for monitoring surface observations is as per the

standard norms laid down by Bureau of Indian Standards (IS:8829) and India

Meteorological Department (IMD).

1.1 Methodology of Data Generation

The Central Monitoring Station (CMS) equipped with continuous monitoring

equipment was installed at site at a height of about 10 m above ground level to

record wind speed, direction, relative humidity and temperature. The

meteorological monitoring station was located in such a way that it is free from

any obstructions and as per the guidelines specified under IS:8829. Cloud cover

was recorded by visual observation. Rainfall was monitored by rain gauge.

The continuous recording meteorological instrument of Dynalab, Pune (Model

No.WDL1002) has been used for recording the met data. The sensitivity of the

equipment is as given in Table-1.

TABLE-1

SENSITIVITY OF METEOROLOGY MONITORING STATION

Sr. No. Sensor Sensitivity

1 Wind speed Sensor ± 0.02 m/s

2 Wind direction Sensor ± 3 degrees

3 Temperature Sensor ± 0.2oC

Hourly maximum, minimum and average values of wind speed, direction and

temperature were recorded continuously with continuous monitoring equipment. All

the sensors were connected to filter and then logged on to datalogger. The readings

were recorded in a memory module, which was attached to datalogger. The

memory module was downloaded in computer through Dynalab software. The

storage capacity of memory module was 256 KB. Data was downloaded every

fortnight into the computer. The data was recorded continuously. The recovery of

data was about 98%. The rest of 2 % data gaps were filled by referring to IMD data

and daily weather reports in the local newspapers. However, Relative Humidity and

Rainfall were recorded manually.

1.2 Ambient Air Quality

The air samples were analyzed as per standard methods specified by Central

Pollution Control Board (CPCB), IS: 5184 and American Public Health Association

(APHA).

The techniques used for ambient air quality monitoring and minimum detectable

level are given in Table-3.

ANNEXURE-III

METHODOLOGY ADOPTED FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

AIII-2

TABLE-3

TECHNIQUES USED FOR AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING

Parameters Test Method

[as per GSR 826(E), Sch-VII] Minimum Detectable

Limit (µµµµg/m3)

Unless Mentioned

Particulate Matter, PM10 Gravimetric Method 1.0

Particulate Matter, PM2.5 Gravimetric Method 1.0

Sulphur dioxide (SO2) Improved West and Gaeke Method 4.0

Nitrogen dioxide (NOx) Modified Jacob and Hochheiser

Method

4.0

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

(3 x 8 hr)

Gas Monitor 12.5

Ozone (O3) (3 x 8 hr) Spectroscopic analysis 0.01 ppm /20 µg/m3

Ammonia, NH3 Indophenol Blue method 4.0

Benzene, C6H6 Solvent extraction followed by GC

analysis

0.001

Benzo(a)pyrene in Particulate

phase

Solvent extraction followed by GC

analysis

0.0001

Mercury(HG) ICPOES 0.001

Acid Mist Solvent extraction 0.1

Heavy metals in particulate

phase for Arsenic (As), Nickel

(Ni), Lead (Pb)

AAS/ICP method 0.0001

1.3 Water Analysis

Samples for chemical analysis were collected in polyethylene carboys. Samples

collected for metal content were acidified with 1 ml HNO3. Samples for

bacteriological analysis were collected in sterilized glass bottles. Selected physico-

chemical and bacteriological parameters have been analyzed for projecting the

existing water quality status in the study area. Parameters like temperature,

Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and pH were analyzed at the time of sample collection.

The methodology for sample collection and preservation techniques was followed as

per the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) mentioned in Table-4.

TABLE-4

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP)

FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER SAMPLING

Parameter Sample Collection Sample

Size

Storage/ Preservation

pH Grab sampling

Plastic /glass container

50 ml On site analysis

Electrical

Conductivity

Grab sampling

Plastic /glass container

50 ml On site parameter

Total suspended

solids

Grab sampling

Plastic /glass container

100 ml Refrigeration,

can be stored for 7 days

Total Dissolved

Solids

Grab sampling

Plastic /glass container

100 ml Refrigeration,

can be stored for 7 days

BOD Grab sampling

Plastic /glass container

500 ml Refrigeration, 48 hrs

Hardness Grab sampling

Plastic /glass container

100 ml Add HNO3 to pH<2,

refrigeration; 6 months

ANNEXURE-III

METHODOLOGY ADOPTED FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

AIII-3

Parameter Sample Collection Sample Size

Storage/ Preservation

Chlorides Grab sampling

Plastic /glass container

50 ml Not required; 28 days

Sulphates Grab sampling

Plastic /glass container

100 ml Refrigeration; 28 days

Sodium, Potassium Plastic container 100 ml Not required; 6 months

Nitrates Plastic containers 100 ml Refrigeration; 48 hrs

Fluorides Plastic containers only 100 ml Not required; 28 days

Alkalinity Plastic/ glass containers 100 ml Refrigeration; 14 days

Ammonia Plastic/ glass containers 100 ml Add H2SO4 to pH>2,

refrigeration, 28 days

Hexavalent

Chromium, Cr+6

Plastic/ Glass rinse with

1+1 HNO3

100 ml Grab sample;

refrigeration; 24 hrs

Heavy Metals (Hg,

Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Zn,

Pb etc.)

Plastic/ Glass rinse with

1+1 HNO3

500 ml Filter, add HNO3 to

pH>2; Grab sample; 6

months

Source: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,

Published By APHA, AWWA, WEF 19th Edition, 1995

1.3.1 Analytical Techniques

The analytical techniques used for water and wastewater analysis is given in the

Table-5.

TABLE-5

ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES

FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER ANALYSIS

Parameter Method

pH APHA-4500-H+

Colour APHA-2120 C

Odour IS: 3025, Part-4

Temperature APHA-2550 B

Dissolved Oxygen APHA-4500 O

BOD APHA-5210 B

Electrical conductivity APHA-2510 B

Turbidity APHA-2130 B

Chlorides APHA-4500 Cl-

Fluorides APHA-4500 F-

Total dissolved solids APHA-2540 C

Total suspended solids APHA-2540 D

Total hardness APHA-2340 C

Sulphates APHA-4500 SO4-2

Arsenic APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3114 B/ APHA-3500 As

Calcium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Ca

Magnesium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Mg

Sodium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Na

Potassium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 K

Manganese APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Mn

Mercury APHA-3112 B/ APHA-3500 Hg

Selenium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3114 B/ APHA-3500 Se

Lead APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Pb

Copper APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Cu

Cadmium APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Cd

Iron APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Fe

Zinc APHA-3120 B/ APHA-3500 Zn

ANNEXURE-III

METHODOLOGY ADOPTED FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

AIII-4

Parameter Method

Boron APHA-4500 B

Coliform organisms APHA-9215 D

Alkalinity APHA-2320 B

1.4 Soil Quality

At each location, soil samples were collected from three different depths viz. 30

cm, 60 cm and 90 cm below the surface and are homogenized. This is in line with

IS: 2720 & Methods of Soil Analysis, Part-1, 2nd edition, 1986 of (American

Society for Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America). The homogenized

samples were analyzed for physical and chemical characteristics. The soil samples

were collected and analyzed once in each season.

The samples have been analyzed as per the established scientific methods for

physico-chemical parameters. The heavy metals have been analyzed by using

Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer and Inductive Coupled Plasma Analyzer.

The methodology adopted for each parameter is described in Table-6.

TABLE-6

ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR SOIL ANALYSIS

Parameter Method (ASTM number)

Grain size distribution Sieve analysis (D 422 – 63)

Textural classification Chart developed by Public Roads Administration

Infiltration capacity Infiltrometer

Bulk density Sand replacement, core cutter

Porosity Void ratio

Sodium absorption ratio Flame colourimetric (D 1428-82)

PH pH meter (D 1293-84)

Electrical conductivity Conductivity meter (D 1125-82)

Nitrogen Kjeldahl distillation (D 3590-84)

Phosphorus Molybdenum blue, colourimetric (D 515-82)

Potassium Flame photometric (D 1428-82)

Copper AAS (D 1688-84)

Iron AAS (D 1068-84)

Zinc AAS (D 1691-84)

Boron Surcumin, colourimetric (D 3082-79)

Chlorides Argentometric (D 512-81 Rev 85)

Fluorides Fusion followed by distillation and estimation by

Ion selective electrod.

1.5 Noise Levels

1.5.1 Method of Monitoring

Noise level monitoring was carried out continuously for 24-hours with one hour

interval starting at 0030 hrs to 0030 hrs next day. The noise levels were monitored

on working days only and Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays were not

monitored. During each hour Leq were directly computed by the instrument based

on the sound pressure levels. Lday (Ld), Lnight (Ln) and Ldn values were computed

using corresponding hourly Leq of day and night respectively. Monitoring was

carried out at ‘A’ response and fast mode.

ANNEXURE-III

METHODOLOGY ADOPTED FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

AIII-5

Parameters Measured During Monitoring

For noise levels measured over a given period of time interval, it is possible to

describe important features of noise using statistical quantities. This is calculated

using the percent of the time certain noise levels exceeds the time interval. The

notation for the statistical quantities of noise levels is described below:

• Hourly Leq values have been computed by integrating sound level meter.

• Lday: As per the CPCB guidelines the day time limit is between 07:00 hours to

22.00 hours as outlined in Ministry of Environment and Forest Notification S.O.

123 (E) dated 14/02/2000.

• Lnight: As per the CPCB guidelines the night time limit is between 22:00 hours to

07.00 hours as outlined in Ministry of Environment and Forest Notification S.O.

123 (E) dated 14/02/2000.

A rating developed by Environmental Protection Agency, (US-EPA) for specification

of community noise from all the sources is the Day-Night Sound Level, (Ldn).

Ldn: It is similar to a 24 hr equivalent sound level except that during night time

period (10 PM to 07 AM) a 10 dB (A) weighting penalty is added to the

instantaneous sound level before computing the 24 hr average. This nighttime

penalty is added to account for the fact that noise during night when people usually

sleep is judged as more annoying than the same noise during the daytime.

The Ldn for a given location in a community may be calculated from the hourly Leq’s,

by the following equation.

24

]1010[

10

15

1

9

1

)10/10()10/(

∑ ∑= =

+

+

=i i

iLiL

dn

eqeq

LogL

Annexure-IV Land Use details

Annexure-V MOUs

Annexure-VI Water Approval Letter

No. VP-3 /PB /Doswada/Vedanta/ 1172

Office of the Deputy Executive Engineer

Ver Project Sub Division No.-3

Vyara. Date:14 /|2/2020

To.

Vedanta Ltd.

CIDC Doswada, Ta. Fort-Songadh

Dist-Tapi, Gujarat,India. Pin Code-394365

Sub: Issue of contour map of Doswada dam with HFL marking.

PReference Your office letter Dtd. 10/12/2020

With reference to the above Subject regarding contour map of Doswada dam requested by you, orne copy of contour map of Doswada dam is attached here, with HFL, FRL details

of Doswada Dam.

Deputy ExecutiveEngineer Ver Project Sub Division No.3

vyara

Doswada dam Details

Sr.No. Detail R.L.

HFL 125.27 m/ 411 ft 1.

2. FRL 123.44 m/ 405 ft

Deputy Executive Engineer Ver Project Sub bivision No.3

vyara

Annexure-VII Solid Waste Utilization MOU

Memorandum of Understanding for supply of Fumer Slag, Gypsum, Fly Ash & Bottom Ash

This MoU is entered on this 24th day of March 2021 between Hindustan Zinc Limited, a company

registered under the Companies Act, and having its registered office at Yashad Bhawan, Udaipur

-313004, Rajasthan, India (hereinafter referred to as "HZL") being the party of the FIRST PART.

AND

LIDIYA AGRO PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED, a company registered under the Company's Act 2013

and having its registered office at P.No: 16, D.NO.35,ARUMUGANAINAR STREET, THIRUNAGAR,

VALASARAVAKKAM, CHENNAI, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 600087, being the party of the SECOND PART.

Both HZL and LIDIYA AGRO PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMTED may hereinafter also be referred to

jointly as the 'Parties' and severally as a 'Party.

WHEREAS

HZL is setting up 0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant, 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant

at Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District-Tapi,

Gujarat and shall be generating 2.1 LTPA quantity of Fumer Slag, 1 LTPA quantity of Gypsum and 4.25 LTPA Fly Ash / Bottom Ash which can be utilzed in manufacturing cement, gypsum board,

fertilizer application, etc.

HZL&LIDIYA AGRO PRODUCTS PRIVATE UMITED after discussion hereto have decided to enter into an MOU for utilizing this Fumer Slag, Sypsum, Fly Ash & Bottom Ash in various beneficial

applications.

NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ABOVE PREMISES AND OF THE UNDERTAKINGS

HEREIN FURNISHED, IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLows:

1. HZL will make available to LIDIYA AGRO PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED 2.1 LTPA quantity of

Fumer Slag, 1 LTPA quantty of Gypsum and 4.25 LTPA Fly Ash / Bottom Ash that will be

generated from its plant from the commercial date of operation. The delivery schedule

and other commercial terms & conditions will be mutually decided by both the parties at

a date closer to the commercial date of operation.

2. HZL & LIDIYA AGRO PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED shall discuss the further steps to be

taken in order to carry out the purpose of this Mou. Both the parties will endeavor to

finalise and enter into such requisite agreements, as may be necessary in line with the

related rules, regulation and

Department/Agencies. notifications of Sate / Central Government

EFFECTIVE DATE, COMMENCEMENT DATE & VALIDITY OF THE MOU

1. The effective date shall be the date of this MOU

2. This MOU shall remain valid till the time a definite detailed agreement incorporating all

the commercial, scope, penaty and legal related matters is executed between the parties

TERMINATION:

1. Any party may terminate this MoU by giving thirty (30) days notice to the other party

during the tenure of this MoU.

SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES:

1. In case of disputes, differences, claims between the parties hereto arising out of this

MOU, the same shall be referred to the senior management of each party for an amicable

settlement.

OTHER CONDITIONS:

1. Any amendment to this MOU in order to be valid shall be in writing. 2. This MOU shall be executed in duplicate and both the counterparts shall be treated as

original.

IN WITNESs WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE HEREUNTO SET THEIR RESPECTIVE HANDS

AND SEALs THE DAY, MONTH AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN

For HZL For LiDIYA AGRO PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED

Signed and delivered by the Signed and delivered by the Director

i Lidiya Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. For HINDUSTAN ZINC

LIMITED

Director Director Projects

Name: P. divAkaRAN.

Signature: Signature:

Name: J.PRATEEK RAJ KANNA

Witness: Witness:

Signature: Signature:

Name: API TI RAL Name: S.RAMESH

ZINO wwIS

Annexure-VIII AAQ Results

ANNEXURE-VIII

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS

Sr.No PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 NH3 Benzene Bap As Ni Pb

Units µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

µg/m3

I II III I II III

1 03.10.2020 42.2 30.5 9.7 10.6 195 211 171 4.7 5.8 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

2 04.10.2020 43.0 28.5 9.3 11.0 197 208 164 4.2 3.7 3.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

3 09.10.2020 43.6 27.9 9.6 10.4 206 221 170 3.8 4.3 3.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

4 10.10.2020 43.2 26.7 9.4 10.3 192 217 167 4.9 5.4 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

5 16.10.2020 44.1 27.1 9.1 10.4 196 221 181 5.5 5.8 5.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

6 17.10.2020 44.8 25.7 8.9 10.2 193 227 178 4.5 5.0 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

7 23.10.2020 45.6 25.1 9.9 10.7 189 230 177 4.8 6.0 5.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

8 24.10.2020 46.2 24.4 9.7 10.8 187 222 176 5.5 6.4 4.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

9 30.10.2020 46.7 23.9 9.3 11.3 192 214 174 5.0 6.6 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

10 31.10.2020 47.9 24.8 9.4 10.9 198 217 172 5.8 6.1 4.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

11 06.11.2020 48.4 25.7 9.2 11.0 205 212 178 5.6 6.0 5.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

12 07.11.2020 48.5 25.1 9.8 11.7 202 218 180 5.0 6.1 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

13 12.11.2020 47.6 24.8 10.3 10.6 195 238 191 5.5 6.5 5.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

14 13.11.2020 46.1 24.5 10.7 11.9 192 235 187 5.0 5.5 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

15 20.11.2020 44.9 25.5 11.0 10.7 189 232 181 6.5 6.6 6.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

16 21.11.2020 42.8 25.8 10.3 11.2 185 227 170 5.8 6.5 5.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

17 27.11.2020 41.6 26.2 9.8 10.2 182 230 167 5.4 6.3 5.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

18 28.11.2020 41.2 26.5 10.0 12.3 197 233 162 6.5 6.7 6.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

19 04.12.2020 39.9 27.7 10.3 13.1 193 225 167 5.0 6.1 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

20 05.12.2020 39.6 28.5 10.7 14.3 196 220 175 4.3 6.0 4.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

21 11.12.2020 41.3 24.9 11.8 13.9 207 248 196 5.4 6.6 5.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

22 12.12.2020 42.2 25.5 11.4 13.1 205 251 183 5.8 6.1 5.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

23 17.12.2020 41.0 26.4 12.1 12.8 203 249 196 6.0 6.3 5.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

24 18.12.2020 40.2 26.1 11.8 12.3 197 247 184 5.4 6.8 5.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

25 26.12.2020 40.7 24.8 11.4 11.9 199 244 183 4.8 6.6 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

26 27.12.2020 39.6 24.0 11.9 11.3 201 241 195 6.1 6.3 5.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Min 39.6 23.9 8.9 10.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Max 48.5 30.5 12.1 14.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Avg 43.6 26.0 10.3 11.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

98th 48.5 29.5 12.0 14.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

162 3.2

251 6.8

201 5.4

AAQ-1 Plant site

DateCO O3

µg/m3

µg/m3

248 6.6

AVIII-1

ANNEXURE-VIII

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS

Sr.No PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 NH3 Benzene Bap As Ni Pb

Units µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

µg/m3

I II III I II III

1 03.10.2020 46.1 36.6 13.0 14.3 229 245 205 5.6 6.7 5.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

2 04.10.2020 46.9 37.6 12.6 15.1 231 242 198 5.1 4.6 4.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

3 09.10.2020 47.5 37.0 12.9 14.5 240 255 204 4.7 5.2 4.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

4 10.10.2020 47.1 35.8 12.7 14.1 226 251 201 5.8 6.3 5.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

5 16.10.2020 48.0 36.2 12.4 14.5 230 255 215 6.4 6.7 6.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

6 17.10.2020 48.7 34.8 12.3 14.3 227 261 212 5.4 5.9 5.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

7 23.10.2020 49.5 34.2 13.2 14.9 223 264 211 5.7 6.9 6.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

8 24.10.2020 50.1 33.5 13.0 15.3 221 256 210 6.4 7.3 5.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

9 30.10.2020 50.6 32.9 12.6 15.4 226 248 208 5.9 7.5 5.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

10 31.10.2020 51.8 33.9 12.7 14.3 232 251 206 6.7 7.0 5.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

11 06.11.2020 52.9 35.2 12.5 15.1 239 246 212 6.5 6.9 6.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

12 07.11.2020 52.4 34.2 13.1 15.8 236 252 214 5.9 7.0 5.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

13 12.11.2020 51.5 33.9 13.6 14.1 229 272 225 6.4 7.4 6.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

14 13.11.2020 50.0 33.6 14.0 16.0 226 269 221 5.9 6.4 5.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

15 20.11.2020 48.8 34.6 14.3 14.5 223 266 215 7.4 7.5 6.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

16 21.11.2020 46.7 34.9 13.6 15.3 219 261 204 6.7 7.4 6.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

17 27.11.2020 45.5 35.3 13.1 14.3 216 264 201 6.3 7.2 6.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

18 28.11.2020 45.1 35.6 13.3 16.4 231 267 196 7.4 7.6 7.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

19 04.12.2020 43.8 36.8 13.6 17.2 227 259 201 5.9 7.0 5.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

20 05.12.2020 43.3 37.6 14.0 17.4 230 254 209 5.2 6.9 4.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

21 11.12.2020 45.2 34.0 15.1 18.4 241 282 230 6.3 7.5 5.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

22 12.12.2020 46.1 34.6 14.7 17.2 239 285 217 6.7 7.0 6.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

23 17.12.2020 44.9 35.5 15.4 16.9 237 283 230 6.9 7.2 6.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

24 18.12.2020 44.1 31.7 14.9 16.4 231 281 218 6.3 7.7 5.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

25 26.12.2020 44.6 33.9 15.2 16.0 233 278 217 5.7 7.5 5.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

26 27.12.2020 43.5 33.1 15.4 15.4 235 275 229 7.0 6.8 6.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Min 43.3 31.7 12.3 14.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Max 52.9 37.6 15.4 18.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Avg 47.5 34.9 13.6 15.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

98th 52.7 37.6 15.4 17.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

196 4.1

285 7.7

235 6.3

AAQ-2 Pokhrana Village

DateCO O3

µg/m3

µg/m3

282 7.5

AVIII-2

ANNEXURE-VIII

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS

Sr.No PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 NH3 Benzene Bap As Ni Pb

Units µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

µg/m3

I II III I II III

1 03.10.2020 55.7 37.7 17.1 20.2 341 342 262 6.9 8.0 6.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

2 04.10.2020 56.5 36.4 16.7 21.0 343 339 255 6.4 5.9 5.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

3 09.10.2020 57.1 36.1 17.0 20.4 352 352 261 6.0 6.5 5.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

4 10.10.2020 56.7 34.9 16.8 20.0 338 348 258 7.1 7.6 6.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

5 16.10.2020 57.6 37.9 16.9 20.4 342 352 272 7.7 8.0 7.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

6 17.10.2020 58.3 36.7 16.5 20.2 339 358 269 6.7 7.2 6.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

7 23.10.2020 59.1 37.3 17.3 19.9 335 361 268 7.0 8.2 7.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

8 24.10.2020 59.7 37.9 17.1 20.8 333 353 267 7.7 8.6 7.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

9 30.10.2020 60.2 36.4 16.7 21.3 338 345 265 7.2 8.8 6.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

10 31.10.2020 61.4 35.7 16.8 19.9 344 348 263 8.0 8.3 6.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

11 06.11.2020 62.5 35.2 16.6 21.0 351 343 269 7.8 8.2 7.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

12 07.11.2020 62.0 36.0 17.2 21.7 348 349 271 7.2 8.3 6.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

13 12.11.2020 61.1 35.1 17.7 20.0 341 369 282 7.7 8.7 7.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

14 13.11.2020 59.6 32.7 18.1 21.9 338 366 278 7.2 7.7 6.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

15 20.11.2020 58.4 34.2 18.4 19.8 335 363 272 8.7 8.8 8.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

16 21.11.2020 56.3 35.1 17.7 21.2 331 358 261 8.0 8.7 7.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

17 27.11.2020 55.1 34.0 17.2 20.2 328 361 258 7.6 8.5 7.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

18 28.11.2020 54.7 34.7 17.4 22.3 343 364 253 8.7 8.9 8.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

19 04.12.2020 53.4 35.9 17.7 23.1 339 356 258 7.2 8.3 6.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

20 05.12.2020 53.1 36.7 18.1 24.3 342 351 266 6.5 8.2 6.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

21 11.12.2020 54.8 33.1 19.2 23.9 353 379 301 7.6 8.8 7.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

22 12.12.2020 55.7 33.7 19.6 23.1 351 382 299 8.0 8.3 7.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

23 17.12.2020 54.5 31.6 19.0 22.8 349 380 293 8.2 8.5 7.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

24 18.12.2020 53.7 34.1 19.1 22.3 343 378 288 7.6 9.2 7.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

25 26.12.2020 54.2 33.0 18.8 21.9 345 375 291 7.0 8.8 6.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

26 27.12.2020 53.1 32.2 19.3 21.3 347 372 286 8.3 8.5 8.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Min 53.1 31.6 16.5 19.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Max 62.5 37.9 19.6 24.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Avg 57.1 35.2 17.7 21.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

98th 62.3 37.9 19.5 24.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

253 5.4

382 9.2

324 7.6

AAQ-3 Stone Quarry area & Forest area

DateCO O3

µg/m3

µg/m3

379 8.8

AVIII-3

ANNEXURE-VIII

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS

Sr.No PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 NH3 Benzene Bap As Ni Pb

Units µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

µg/m3

I II III I II III

1 03.10.2020 56.6 38.3 15.9 18.8 293 323 268 5.4 5.8 5.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

2 04.10.2020 57.4 36.3 15.5 19.6 299 330 256 5.4 5.7 5.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

3 09.10.2020 58.0 35.7 15.8 19.0 296 326 254 5.8 6.3 5.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

4 10.10.2020 57.6 34.5 15.6 18.3 292 323 251 5.4 6.4 5.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

5 16.10.2020 58.5 34.9 15.3 19.0 300 329 248 5.7 6.7 5.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

6 17.10.2020 59.2 35.2 15.2 18.8 306 335 243 5.6 6.2 5.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

7 23.10.2020 60.0 32.9 16.1 18.5 309 339 249 5.2 6.4 5.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

8 24.10.2020 60.6 32.2 15.9 19.4 307 326 254 6.1 6.5 5.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

9 30.10.2020 61.1 31.8 15.5 19.9 310 323 257 6.2 7.2 6.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

10 31.10.2020 62.3 32.6 15.6 18.5 305 329 261 6.5 7.5 6.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

11 06.11.2020 63.4 33.9 15.4 19.6 316 319 265 6.5 6.8 6.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

12 07.11.2020 62.9 32.9 16.0 20.3 312 326 259 6.3 6.5 5.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

13 12.11.2020 62.0 32.6 16.5 18.6 309 322 254 7.7 8.4 6.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

14 13.11.2020 60.5 32.3 16.9 20.5 306 319 251 7.3 8.4 5.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

15 20.11.2020 59.3 33.3 17.2 18.4 302 333 254 7.6 8.8 6.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

16 21.11.2020 57.2 33.6 16.5 19.8 307 332 258 6.4 7.7 5.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

17 27.11.2020 56.0 34.0 16.0 18.8 316 330 262 8.0 7.9 7.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

18 28.11.2020 55.6 34.3 16.2 20.9 312 327 265 7.3 8.7 7.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

19 04.12.2020 54.3 35.5 16.5 21.7 310 345 261 8.5 8.2 7.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

20 05.12.2020 54.0 36.3 16.9 22.9 307 342 256 6.4 8.0 7.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

21 11.12.2020 55.7 32.7 18.0 22.5 312 340 258 8.3 8.5 8.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

22 12.12.2020 56.6 33.3 18.4 21.7 309 339 254 7.4 8.1 6.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

23 17.12.2020 55.4 34.2 17.8 21.4 305 337 252 6.0 8.2 5.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

24 18.12.2020 54.6 33.9 17.9 20.9 316 357 265 7.1 7.4 7.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

25 26.12.2020 55.1 34.3 17.6 20.5 313 349 262 8.0 8.7 7.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

26 27.12.2020 54.0 35.6 18.1 19.9 311 347 268 7.3 8.0 7.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Min 54.0 31.8 15.2 18.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Max 63.4 38.3 18.4 22.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Avg 58.0 34.1 16.5 19.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

98th 63.2 37.3 18.3 22.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

243 5.1

357 8.8

299 6.8

AAQ-4 Songadh Town

DateCO O3

µg/m3

µg/m3

348 8.7

AVIII-4

ANNEXURE-VIII

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS

Sr.No PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 NH3 Benzene Bap As Ni Pb

Units µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

µg/m3

I II III I II III

1 03.10.2020 48.4 30.3 11.2 12.9 217 247 223 4.6 6.7 4.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

2 04.10.2020 48.1 31.2 10.8 13.7 223 254 211 5.6 7.0 5.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

3 09.10.2020 47.6 30.6 11.1 13.1 220 250 209 5.1 6.2 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

4 10.10.2020 47.2 29.4 10.9 12.7 216 247 206 5.0 6.9 3.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

5 16.10.2020 46.8 29.8 10.6 13.1 224 253 203 5.5 7.0 5.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

6 17.10.2020 46.4 33.8 10.7 12.9 230 259 198 5.0 7.1 5.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

7 23.10.2020 52.4 31.2 11.4 12.6 233 263 204 4.9 7.3 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

8 24.10.2020 45.1 27.7 11.2 13.5 231 250 209 6.1 7.0 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

9 30.10.2020 44.8 28.2 10.8 14.0 234 247 212 5.6 6.7 4.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

10 31.10.2020 44.5 27.5 10.9 12.6 229 253 216 6.0 6.3 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

11 06.11.2020 44.3 28.8 10.7 13.7 240 243 220 5.2 6.5 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

12 07.11.2020 43.9 27.8 11.3 14.4 236 250 214 6.1 5.9 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

13 12.11.2020 43.5 27.5 11.8 12.7 233 246 209 4.5 5.3 4.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

14 13.11.2020 43.2 27.1 12.2 14.6 230 243 206 5.7 6.5 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

15 20.11.2020 42.9 28.2 12.5 12.5 226 257 209 4.5 5.8 4.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

16 21.11.2020 42.5 28.5 11.8 13.9 231 256 213 4.6 5.1 3.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

17 27.11.2020 42.2 28.9 11.3 12.9 240 254 217 4.8 5.7 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

18 28.11.2020 41.8 29.2 11.5 15.0 236 251 220 5.5 6.0 5.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

19 04.12.2020 41.6 30.4 11.8 15.8 234 269 216 5.8 6.5 3.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

20 05.12.2020 41.3 31.2 12.2 16.1 231 266 211 4.9 5.9 5.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

21 11.12.2020 40.8 27.6 13.3 16.9 236 264 213 5.1 6.6 3.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

22 12.12.2020 40.4 28.2 12.9 15.8 233 263 209 6.5 6.7 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

23 17.12.2020 40.1 29.1 13.1 15.5 229 261 207 5.6 6.1 3.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

24 18.12.2020 40.8 28.8 13.7 15.0 240 277 220 5.8 5.7 5.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

25 26.12.2020 41.2 27.3 12.9 16.7 237 273 217 5.2 6.5 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

26 27.12.2020 40.7 28.2 13.4 15.9 235 271 223 6.1 5.9 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Min 40.1 27.1 10.6 12.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Max 52.4 33.8 13.7 16.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Avg 43.9 29.1 11.8 14.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

98th 50.4 32.5 13.6 16.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

198 3.5

263 6.7

231 5.3

AAQ-5 Kumkua Village

DateCO O3

µg/m3

µg/m3

260 6.7

AVIII-5

ANNEXURE-VIII

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS

Sr.No PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 NH3 Benzene Bap As Ni Pb

Units µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

µg/m3

I II III I II III

1 05.10.2020 41.1 27.5 10.2 12.3 186 261 184 4.7 6.8 4.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

2 06.10.2020 41.8 26.1 9.8 12.0 177 256 190 4.5 7.1 3.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

3 12.10.2020 42.3 25.5 10.1 11.8 180 270 193 4.3 7.4 4.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

4 13.10.2020 42.7 24.3 9.9 11.5 183 273 200 4.0 7.4 3.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

5 19.10.2020 43.1 24.7 10.0 11.7 189 279 203 3.8 7.7 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

6 20.10.2020 45.3 23.3 9.8 11.9 193 283 210 3.6 7.3 3.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

7 27.10.2020 44.6 22.7 10.4 12.3 182 272 194 4.0 7.1 3.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

8 28.10.2020 46.8 22.0 10.2 11.8 184 176 197 4.2 6.9 3.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

9 02.11.2020 42.0 21.1 9.8 12.3 193 267 178 4.4 6.7 4.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

10 03.11.2020 41.8 22.4 9.9 11.9 190 263 181 4.8 6.5 4.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

11 09.11.2020 41.2 23.7 9.7 12.0 200 269 175 5.0 6.6 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

12 10.11.2020 40.6 20.5 10.3 12.7 211 270 192 5.3 6.3 4.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

13 16.11.2020 40.2 20.1 10.8 11.8 207 266 180 5.1 6.7 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

14 17.11.2020 40.0 20.4 11.2 12.9 221 276 189 5.0 7.0 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

15 23.11.2020 39.5 19.6 11.5 11.5 216 274 186 4.8 7.4 4.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

16 24.11.2020 39.2 19.8 10.8 12.2 213 271 184 4.6 7.1 4.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

17 01.12.2020 38.1 20.2 10.3 11.7 229 279 190 4.4 6.7 3.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

18 02.12.2020 37.7 20.7 10.5 13.3 231 261 204 4.2 6.5 3.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

19 07.12.2020 37.3 21.3 10.8 14.1 236 268 199 4.3 6.2 4.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

20 08.12.2020 38.7 22.0 11.2 15.3 234 264 202 4.0 6.0 3.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

21 14.12.2020 39.1 22.5 12.3 14.9 247 294 211 3.8 5.8 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

22 15.12.2020 38.5 23.1 11.9 14.1 245 289 210 4.4 5.7 3.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

23 21.12.2020 38.8 24.0 12.1 13.8 239 285 206 4.6 5.6 4.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

24 22.12.2020 39.4 23.7 12.6 13.3 241 279 200 4.9 5.4 3.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

25 28.12.2020 40.0 22.4 11.9 12.9 243 276 203 4.0 6.8 3.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

26 29.12.2020 39.7 21.6 12.4 12.3 249 271 196 4.5 6.3 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Min 37.3 19.6 9.7 11.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Max 46.8 27.5 12.6 15.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Avg 40.8 22.5 10.8 12.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

98th 46.1 26.8 12.5 15.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

175 3.3

294 7.7

225 5.0

AAQ-6 Kakadkua Village

DateCO O3

µg/m3

µg/m3

287 7.4

AVIII-6

ANNEXURE-VIII

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS

Sr.No PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 NH3 Benzene Bap As Ni Pb

Units µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

µg/m3

I II III I II III

1 05.10.2020 47.6 30.3 9.7 11.6 224 254 201 5.3 6.6 4.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

2 06.10.2020 45.3 25.9 9.3 12.4 221 258 198 5.2 6.6 4.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

3 12.10.2020 44.8 25.3 9.6 11.8 228 257 197 5.3 7.3 4.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

4 13.10.2020 45.3 24.1 9.4 11.4 231 257 194 5.7 5.3 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

5 19.10.2020 44.0 24.5 9.1 11.8 225 255 192 5.4 6.1 4.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

6 20.10.2020 44.4 23.1 9.5 11.6 222 252 190 5.2 6.3 5.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

7 27.10.2020 42.8 22.5 9.9 11.3 220 250 188 5.1 6.5 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

8 28.10.2020 43.6 22.4 9.7 12.2 218 247 186 4.8 6.8 4.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

9 02.11.2020 42.0 22.9 9.3 12.7 216 245 189 7.6 5.3 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

10 03.11.2020 43.0 22.2 9.4 11.3 215 242 192 4.4 4.8 4.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

11 09.11.2020 41.5 23.5 9.2 12.4 212 238 195 4.6 5.5 4.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

12 10.11.2020 42.7 22.5 9.8 13.1 211 234 197 5.8 6.6 4.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

13 16.11.2020 40.7 22.2 10.3 11.4 214 231 199 5.1 6.4 4.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

14 17.11.2020 39.3 22.2 10.7 13.3 208 234 201 6.3 7.5 5.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

15 23.11.2020 40.1 22.9 11.0 11.2 215 237 205 5.7 6.5 4.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

16 24.11.2020 39.7 23.2 10.3 12.6 231 240 211 6.3 6.3 4.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

17 01.12.2020 39.4 23.6 9.8 11.6 224 235 214 6.1 6.9 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

18 02.12.2020 39.0 23.9 10.0 13.7 227 237 198 5.7 6.6 5.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

19 07.12.2020 37.8 25.1 10.3 14.5 222 240 203 5.3 6.4 5.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

20 08.12.2020 38.5 25.9 10.7 14.8 220 244 201 4.8 8.0 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

21 14.12.2020 36.7 22.3 11.8 15.6 218 242 197 5.3 6.1 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

22 15.12.2020 37.6 22.9 12.3 14.5 216 240 194 4.3 6.3 4.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

23 21.12.2020 36.8 23.8 11.6 14.2 221 235 190 4.8 6.6 4.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

24 22.12.2020 37.9 23.5 11.7 13.7 211 232 201 5.2 6.9 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

28.12.2020 38.5 22.4 11.4 15.4 216 240 194 6.1 6.9 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

29.12.2020 37.1 24.6 11.9 14.6 215 242 192 6.3 7.5 5.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Min 36.7 22.2 9.1 11.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Max 47.6 30.3 12.3 15.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Avg 41.0 23.8 10.3 12.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

98th 46.5 28.1 12.1 15.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

186 4.2

258 8.0

220 5.5

AAQ-7 Doswada

DateCO O3

µg/m3

µg/m3

257 7.6

AVIII-7

ANNEXURE-VIII

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS

Sr.No PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 NH3 Benzene Bap As Ni Pb

Units µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

µg/m3

I II III I II III

1 05.10.2020 52.3 37.9 12.8 14.2 189 264 187 5.8 7.1 4.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

2 06.10.2020 53.5 34.6 12.4 15.0 180 259 193 5.7 7.1 5.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

3 12.10.2020 51.2 34.0 12.1 14.4 183 273 196 5.8 7.8 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

4 13.10.2020 53.7 32.8 12.5 14.0 186 276 203 6.2 5.8 5.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

5 19.10.2020 51.7 33.2 12.6 14.4 192 282 206 5.9 6.6 4.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

6 20.10.2020 50.2 31.8 12.1 14.2 196 286 213 5.7 6.8 5.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

7 27.10.2020 49.6 31.2 13.0 13.9 185 275 197 5.6 7.0 5.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

8 28.10.2020 48.4 30.5 12.8 14.8 187 179 200 5.3 7.3 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

9 02.11.2020 49.0 29.7 12.4 15.3 196 270 181 8.1 5.8 4.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

10 03.11.2020 47.7 30.9 12.5 13.9 193 266 184 4.9 5.3 5.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

11 09.11.2020 47.1 32.2 12.3 15.0 203 272 178 5.1 6.0 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

12 10.11.2020 47.8 31.2 12.9 15.7 214 273 195 6.3 7.1 4.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

13 16.11.2020 46.4 30.9 13.4 14.0 210 269 183 5.6 6.9 5.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

14 17.11.2020 47.1 30.6 13.8 15.9 224 279 192 6.8 8.0 6.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

15 23.11.2020 45.7 31.6 14.1 13.8 219 277 189 6.2 7.0 5.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

16 24.11.2020 44.5 31.9 13.4 15.2 216 274 187 6.8 6.8 5.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

17 01.12.2020 43.4 32.3 12.9 14.2 232 282 193 6.6 7.4 4.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

18 02.12.2020 42.3 32.6 13.1 16.3 234 264 207 6.2 7.1 6.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

19 07.12.2020 41.1 33.8 13.4 17.1 239 271 202 5.8 6.9 5.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

20 08.12.2020 40.2 34.6 13.8 18.3 237 267 205 5.3 8.5 4.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

21 14.12.2020 42.5 31.0 14.9 17.9 250 297 214 5.8 6.6 5.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

22 15.12.2020 41.0 31.6 14.5 17.1 248 292 213 4.8 6.8 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

23 21.12.2020 41.7 32.5 14.7 16.8 242 288 209 5.3 7.1 4.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

24 22.12.2020 42.9 32.2 15.2 16.3 244 282 203 5.7 7.4 5.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

25 28.12.2020 42.1 32.6 14.5 15.9 246 279 206 6.6 7.4 4.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

26 29.12.2020 41.4 33.9 15.0 15.3 252 274 199 6.8 8.0 6.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Min 40.2 29.7 12.1 13.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Max 53.7 37.9 15.2 18.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Avg 46.3 32.4 13.4 15.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

98th 53.6 36.3 15.1 18.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

178 4.7

297 8.5

228 6.1

AAQ-8 West side of Plant Site

DateCO O3

µg/m3

µg/m3

290 8.1

AVIII-8

ANNEXURE-VIII

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS

Sr.No PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 NH3 Benzene Bap As Ni Pb

Units µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

µg/m3

I II III I II III

1 05.10.2020 43.3 26.7 11.1 12.4 189 238 183 4.5 5.8 3.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

2 06.10.2020 43.9 22.2 10.7 13.2 199 242 180 4.4 5.8 4.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

3 12.10.2020 45.2 21.6 10.4 12.6 202 237 178 4.5 6.5 3.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

4 13.10.2020 44.7 20.4 10.8 12.2 206 233 174 4.9 4.5 3.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

5 19.10.2020 43.9 22.1 10.9 12.6 198 221 185 4.6 5.3 3.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

6 20.10.2020 42.8 19.4 10.3 12.4 194 208 188 4.4 5.5 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

7 27.10.2020 42.1 18.8 11.3 12.1 190 223 190 4.3 5.7 3.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

8 28.10.2020 41.3 18.1 11.1 13.0 196 226 193 4.0 6.0 3.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

9 02.11.2020 41.0 18.4 10.7 13.5 201 233 185 6.8 4.5 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

10 03.11.2020 40.1 20.5 10.8 12.1 203 231 179 3.6 4.0 3.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

11 09.11.2020 39.3 19.8 10.6 13.2 199 222 176 3.8 4.7 3.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

12 10.11.2020 38.9 18.6 11.2 13.9 196 219 169 5.0 5.8 3.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

13 16.11.2020 38.2 19.4 11.7 12.2 200 216 175 4.3 5.6 3.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

14 17.11.2020 36.9 18.2 12.1 14.1 204 213 178 5.5 6.7 4.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

15 23.11.2020 36.0 17.8 12.4 12.0 200 218 181 4.9 5.7 4.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

16 24.11.2020 34.7 19.5 11.7 13.4 199 241 183 5.5 5.5 4.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

17 01.12.2020 33.0 19.9 11.2 12.4 198 238 180 5.3 6.1 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

18 02.12.2020 31.9 20.2 11.4 14.5 196 232 179 4.9 5.8 4.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

19 07.12.2020 32.4 21.4 11.7 15.3 194 235 176 4.5 5.6 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

20 08.12.2020 33.3 20.0 12.1 15.6 191 229 178 4.0 7.2 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

21 14.12.2020 34.4 18.6 13.2 16.4 197 226 173 4.5 5.3 3.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

22 15.12.2020 34.9 19.2 12.8 15.3 200 228 182 3.5 5.5 3.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

23 21.12.2020 35.3 18.9 13.0 15.0 218 265 190 4.0 5.8 3.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

24 22.12.2020 36.2 19.8 13.2 14.5 206 258 188 4.4 6.1 3.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

28.12.2020 33.7 18.1 12.8 16.2 203 255 186 5.3 6.1 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

29.12.2020 34.6 18.9 13.0 15.4 201 243 184 5.5 6.7 4.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Min 31.9 17.8 10.3 12.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Max 45.2 26.7 13.2 16.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Avg 38.2 19.9 11.6 13.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

98th 45.0 24.5 13.2 16.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

169 3.4

265 7.2

203 4.7

AAQ-9 Kikakui Village

DateCO O3

µg/m3

µg/m3

251 6.8

AVIII-9

ANNEXURE-VIII

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY LEVELS

Sr.No PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NO2 NH3 Benzene Bap As Ni Pb

Units µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

µg/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

ng/m3

µg/m3

I II III I II III

1 05.10.2020 44.9 27.3 10.2 11.9 203 247 188 4.5 6.9 4.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

2 06.10.2020 41.4 22.3 9.8 12.7 202 245 190 4.2 7.2 3.9 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

3 12.10.2020 40.9 21.7 10.1 12.1 200 243 192 4.3 7.5 4.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

4 13.10.2020 43.6 20.5 9.9 11.4 198 240 182 5.1 7.3 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

5 19.10.2020 40.1 20.9 10.0 12.1 195 236 180 5.5 7.1 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

6 20.10.2020 39.7 19.5 9.5 11.9 189 232 178 5.7 6.5 5.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

7 27.10.2020 38.9 18.9 10.4 11.6 192 235 175 5.8 6.2 5.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

8 28.10.2020 38.4 18.8 10.2 12.5 194 238 179 5.9 6.0 5.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

9 02.11.2020 38.1 18.5 9.8 13.0 186 232 181 5.6 5.8 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

10 03.11.2020 37.8 18.6 9.9 11.6 190 228 183 5.0 5.5 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

11 09.11.2020 37.6 19.9 9.7 12.7 182 225 179 5.2 5.7 4.2 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

12 10.11.2020 37.2 18.9 10.3 13.4 180 223 176 5.4 5.9 4.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

13 16.11.2020 36.8 18.6 10.8 11.7 178 220 175 5.6 6.1 4.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

14 17.11.2020 36.5 18.6 11.2 13.6 176 216 172 5.8 6.3 4.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

15 23.11.2020 36.2 19.3 11.5 11.5 180 219 176 5.5 5.8 5.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

16 24.11.2020 35.8 19.6 10.8 12.9 172 223 180 5.3 5.6 5.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

17 01.12.2020 35.5 20.0 10.3 11.9 175 229 172 5.1 5.3 4.7 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

18 02.12.2020 35.1 20.3 10.5 14.0 178 232 175 4.9 5.1 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

19 07.12.2020 34.9 21.5 10.8 14.8 182 220 180 5.0 5.9 4.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

20 08.12.2020 34.6 22.3 11.2 16.0 179 205 176 5.2 6.6 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

21 14.12.2020 34.1 18.7 12.3 15.6 180 212 175 5.6 6.3 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

22 15.12.2020 33.7 19.3 11.9 14.8 168 216 166 5.4 6.0 3.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

23 21.12.2020 32.8 20.2 12.1 14.5 165 220 165 5.5 5.8 4.6 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

24 22.12.2020 34.1 19.9 12.6 14.0 170 228 169 5.0 5.2 4.3 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

28.12.2020 34.4 18.8 11.9 13.6 172 223 180 5.6 6.3 3.5 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

29.12.2020 33.5 20.5 12.4 13.0 175 229 172 5.4 5.9 4.1 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Min 32.8 18.5 9.5 11.4 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Max 44.9 27.3 12.6 16.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

Avg 37.2 20.1 10.8 13.0 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001

98th 44.3 24.8 12.5 15.8 <20.0 <0.001 <0.1 <1.0 <1.0 <0.001244 7.2

165 3.3

247 7.5

196 5.3

AAQ-10 Nishana Village

DateCO O3

µg/m3

µg/m3

AVIII-10

Annexure-IX Demography Details

ANNEXURE-IX

DEMOGRAPHIC DETAILS

Sl.No.

Name of the

Village/Urban Area

Total

workers

Main

workers

Total

Main

workers

Cultivators

Main

workers

Agricultural

Laborers

Main

workers

Household

Industry

Workers

Main

workers

Other

Workers

Marginal

workers

Total

Marginal

workers

Cultivators

Marginal

workers

Agricultural

Laborers

Marginal

workers

Household

Industry

Workers

Marginal

workers

Other

Workers

Marginal

workers

Other

Workers 3 -

6 months

Total

Marginal

workers

Cultivators

3 - 6

months

Marginal

workers

Agricultural

Laborers 3 -

6 months

Marginal

workers

Household

Industry

Workers 3 -

6 months

Marginal

workers

Other

Workers 3

to 6 months

Marginal

workers

Other

Workers 0-

3 months

Total

Marginal

workers

Cultivators

0-3 months

Marginal

workers

Agricultural

Laborers 0-

3 months

Marginal

workers

Household

Industry

Workers 0-

3 months

Marginal

workers

Other

Workers 0-

3 months

0-3 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

1 Nishana 1173 561 434 33 4 90 612 187 195 7 223 608 187 191 7 223 4 0 4 0 0

2 Achhalva 446 385 94 275 1 15 61 14 46 0 1 61 14 46 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

3 Sadadkuva 822 795 288 444 0 63 27 3 15 0 9 26 2 15 0 9 1 1 0 0 0

4 Pokhran 303 301 9 174 0 118 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Kikakui 1574 779 358 309 2 110 795 157 537 29 72 466 136 269 12 49 329 21 268 17 23

6 Mandal 1139 940 320 476 2 142 199 18 44 3 134 197 17 44 3 133 2 1 0 0 1

7 Dosvada 2657 1405 490 655 20 240 1252 102 1051 12 87 984 99 789 11 85 268 3 262 1 2

8 Kumkuva 915 398 113 69 11 205 517 145 295 4 73 511 145 290 4 72 6 0 5 0 1

9 Rupvada 424 315 7 223 0 85 109 2 54 8 45 107 2 54 8 43 2 0 0 0 2

Sub Total 9453 5879 2113 2658 40 1068 3574 629 2238 63 644 2962 603 1699 45 615 612 26 539 18 29

3-7 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

10 Jhadpati 237 235 63 154 2 16 2 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

11 Galkhadi 287 268 43 212 0 13 19 1 15 0 3 19 1 15 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

12 Moti Khervan 1630 1222 280 791 2 149 408 17 378 2 11 345 5 329 1 10 63 12 49 1 1

13 Vagda 939 451 118 94 4 235 488 14 146 6 322 373 14 34 6 319 115 0 112 0 3

14 Dumda 878 634 202 195 4 233 244 26 145 22 51 230 25 134 22 49 14 1 11 0 2

15 Amlipada 665 553 147 237 15 154 112 5 61 3 43 108 5 58 2 43 4 0 3 1 0

16 Kelai 724 425 111 64 0 250 299 40 189 0 70 283 40 183 0 60 16 0 6 0 10

17 Kavla 342 331 98 219 0 14 11 5 2 0 4 8 5 1 0 2 3 0 1 0 2

18 Amli 879 329 16 301 1 11 550 1 547 0 2 550 1 547 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

19 Champavadi 573 500 94 311 1 94 73 4 31 0 38 72 4 31 0 37 1 0 0 0 1

20 Chakalia 938 793 56 466 10 261 145 11 91 1 42 145 11 91 1 42 0 0 0 0 0

21 Khambhala 396 130 20 64 5 41 266 9 225 3 29 264 9 223 3 29 2 0 2 0 0

22 Chapaldhara 172 65 24 25 1 15 107 4 76 4 23 103 4 73 4 22 4 0 3 0 1

23 Raniamba 1000 816 70 248 3 495 184 4 37 0 143 182 4 37 0 141 2 0 0 0 2

24 Balamrai 132 54 22 22 0 10 78 1 64 0 13 77 1 63 0 13 1 0 1 0 0

25 Tokarva (Segupada) 2099 1103 430 572 2 99 996 89 741 7 159 982 84 736 7 155 14 5 5 0 4

26 Tokarva (Jamankuva) 400 147 11 92 36 8 253 7 170 61 15 250 7 168 60 15 3 0 2 1 0

27 Kakad Kuva 460 200 149 3 4 44 260 1 162 8 89 260 1 162 8 89 0 0 0 0 0

28 Kharsi 884 477 119 102 1 255 407 169 161 0 77 402 169 159 0 74 5 0 2 0 3

29 Devalpada 285 131 93 17 2 19 154 84 63 0 7 153 84 63 0 6 1 0 0 0 1

30 Kanala 761 558 387 99 3 69 203 187 7 1 8 20 7 6 0 7 183 180 1 1 1

31 Chorvad 1208 993 136 668 9 180 215 94 88 6 27 212 94 88 3 27 3 0 0 3 0

32 Chikhli Khadka 881 713 285 331 8 89 168 143 15 1 9 167 143 15 1 8 1 0 0 0 1

33 Junvan 504 400 166 227 0 7 104 3 101 0 0 104 3 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

34 Galkuva 1006 695 387 237 4 67 311 5 304 0 2 311 5 304 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

35 Bedpada 181 177 54 110 6 7 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

36 Kanadevi 159 43 33 8 0 2 116 1 115 0 0 116 1 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

37 Rampura Kanadevi 387 117 53 44 2 18 270 7 254 1 8 254 7 239 1 7 16 0 15 0 1

38 Nana Bandharpada 392 47 10 1 2 34 345 60 247 13 25 262 59 169 9 25 83 1 78 4 0

39 Jharali 501 170 133 14 2 21 331 147 180 3 1 330 147 179 3 1 1 0 1 0 0

40 Kukradungri 421 415 153 30 27 205 6 1 2 0 3 5 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 0

41 Kukadjhar 205 105 82 9 0 14 100 12 80 0 8 99 12 79 0 8 1 0 1 0 0

42 Vadpada P Tokarva 355 60 38 21 0 1 295 7 287 0 1 293 7 285 0 1 2 0 2 0 0

43 Ghodchit 646 550 162 346 3 39 96 56 22 0 18 89 50 21 0 18 7 6 1 0 0

44 Bandharpada 917 670 471 41 2 156 247 0 239 0 8 247 0 239 0 8 0 0 0 0 0

45 Songadh (M) 10049 7948 82 376 283 7207 2101 21 205 53 1822 1810 20 201 43 1546 291 1 4 10 276

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

46 Virpur 445 349 121 74 18 136 96 3 67 18 8 96 3 67 18 8 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 32938 22874 4919 6825 462 10668 10064 1240 5517 213 3094 9227 1034 5216 192 2785 837 206 301 21 309

AIX-1

ANNEXURE-IX

DEMOGRAPHIC DETAILS

7-10 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

47 Dhajamba 1953 1348 513 566 183 86 605 272 130 109 94 604 272 130 108 94 1 0 0 1 0

48 Veljhar 498 496 19 475 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

49 Vajharda 1504 1091 462 519 12 98 413 95 256 18 44 384 86 245 16 37 29 9 11 2 7

50 Bedvan P Bhensrot 438 374 41 285 35 13 64 5 50 1 8 63 5 50 1 7 1 0 0 0 1

51 Ukhalda 1862 1388 715 197 68 408 474 125 155 8 186 473 125 154 8 186 1 0 1 0 0

52 Pipalkuva 1685 1323 75 1118 43 87 362 9 320 4 29 361 9 320 4 28 1 0 0 0 1

53 Nani Khervan 478 181 100 5 0 76 297 17 253 0 27 261 15 222 0 24 36 2 31 0 3

54 Ghoda 1004 453 88 277 1 87 551 6 539 1 5 539 6 529 1 3 12 0 10 0 2

55 Bhimpura 1555 1413 66 373 0 974 142 5 89 0 48 129 4 82 0 43 13 1 7 0 5

56 Gunsada 2675 1650 223 630 24 773 1025 80 343 62 540 939 77 300 55 507 86 3 43 7 33

57 Bedi 932 412 190 131 1 90 520 29 422 7 62 484 28 403 5 48 36 1 19 2 14

58 Agasvan 1176 958 215 530 27 186 218 25 141 7 45 207 23 138 3 43 11 2 3 4 2

59 Gaisavar 264 212 49 139 1 23 52 7 31 0 14 52 7 31 0 14 0 0 0 0 0

60 Chimkuva 694 491 225 240 0 26 203 27 166 4 6 203 27 166 4 6 0 0 0 0 0

61 Nani Bhurvan 51 18 15 1 0 2 33 4 28 0 1 15 1 13 0 1 18 3 15 0 0

62 Medhsingi 646 634 265 346 1 22 12 1 11 0 0 11 1 10 0 0 1 0 1 0 0

63 Khokhsa 165 80 29 33 0 18 85 1 83 1 0 21 1 20 0 0 64 0 63 1 0

64 Moti Bhurvan 145 64 25 14 0 25 81 6 65 3 7 49 5 37 0 7 32 1 28 3 0

65 Hiravadi 810 624 323 185 5 111 186 57 59 4 66 186 57 59 4 66 0 0 0 0 0

66 Amba 671 497 228 182 0 87 174 8 162 1 3 170 5 161 1 3 4 3 1 0 0

67 Gatadi 458 381 228 64 12 77 77 19 11 3 44 77 19 11 3 44 0 0 0 0 0

68 Tichakia 445 293 165 89 15 24 152 23 106 10 13 135 19 99 5 12 17 4 7 5 1

69 Hanmantiya 628 622 587 20 0 15 6 1 3 0 2 6 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

70 Mahudi 292 261 217 15 20 9 31 30 0 0 1 30 29 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0

71 Monghvan 1425 478 372 89 5 12 947 214 700 15 18 550 192 331 12 15 397 22 369 3 3

72 Maiyali 475 469 145 261 0 63 6 5 0 0 1 6 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

73 Sandhkuva 320 147 129 6 2 10 173 1 160 3 9 166 1 158 3 4 7 0 2 0 5

74 Tarsadi 422 290 133 95 51 11 132 0 132 0 0 132 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

75 Kakad Kuva P Umarda 382 198 60 78 0 60 184 65 103 1 15 182 64 103 1 14 2 1 0 0 1

76 Bedvan P Umarda 453 157 10 142 0 5 296 4 291 0 1 217 4 212 0 1 79 0 79 0 0

77 Vadpada P Umarda 823 500 170 295 10 25 323 64 258 0 1 257 52 205 0 0 66 12 53 0 1

78 Chakvan 600 163 57 59 32 15 437 176 238 7 16 436 176 237 7 16 1 0 1 0 0

79 Borkuva 555 188 17 147 0 24 367 4 359 1 3 336 2 331 1 2 31 2 28 0 1

80 Kalaghat 370 285 150 76 1 58 85 2 82 0 1 85 2 82 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

81 Katiskuva Najik 893 845 400 385 9 51 48 17 27 4 0 45 14 27 4 0 3 3 0 0 0

82 Sarkuva 637 503 371 55 5 72 134 39 88 1 6 134 39 88 1 6 0 0 0 0 0

83 Katgadh 215 198 55 103 18 22 17 6 8 0 3 16 6 7 0 3 1 0 1 0 0

84 Bedkuva Najik 785 533 306 41 2 184 252 41 166 4 41 248 41 164 4 39 4 0 2 0 2

85 Kanpura 1746 1396 220 389 27 760 350 151 124 9 66 348 151 124 7 66 2 0 0 2 0

86 Tadkuva 1018 896 151 266 13 466 122 4 61 1 56 118 4 59 1 54 4 0 2 0 2

87 Chikhli 1692 1641 545 803 6 287 51 6 22 6 17 51 6 22 6 17 0 0 0 0 0

88 Vaghjhari 477 353 140 116 1 96 124 82 38 0 4 95 62 31 0 2 29 20 7 0 2

89 Chikhalda 1180 858 288 410 30 130 322 26 223 11 62 320 26 221 11 62 2 0 2 0 0

90 Saraiya 944 597 396 174 1 26 347 48 273 1 25 347 48 273 1 25 0 0 0 0 0

91 Pervad 852 648 552 66 3 27 204 2 189 6 7 18 2 9 0 7 186 0 180 6 0

Uchchhai taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

92 Pankhri 734 727 39 606 1 81 7 0 5 1 1 7 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 38027 27334 9769 11096 666 5803 10693 1809 6972 314 1598 9515 1719 6006 278 1512 1178 90 966 36 86

Grand Total 80418 56087 16801 20579 1168 17539 24331 3678 14727 590 5336 21704 3356 12921 515 4912 2627 322 1806 75 424

AIX-2

Annexure-X SIA Report

Environmental Consultant:

April, 2021

Project Proponent:

SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT - SIA STUDY

FOR THE PROPOSED GREENFIELD ZINC SMELTER

COMPLEX (1X0.35 MTPA ZINC SMELTER ALONG WITH

FUMER PLANT), 2X90 MW CAPTIVE POWER PLANT AND 35

MW WHRB AT GIDC DOSWADA, TALUKA SONGADH,

DISTRICT TAPI, GUJARAT

FINAL DRAFT REPORT FOR PUBLIC HEARING

(Approved Consultant) Vimta Labs Limited

142, IDA, Phase-II, Cherlapally,

Hyderabad–500 051, Telangana State

www.vimta.com, [email protected]

MoEF&CC, New Delhi Recognized Laboratory

NABET Accredited Category A Consultant

NABET Accreditation No. : QCI/NABET/EIA/ACO/21/1630 date 16.02.2021

SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT - SIA STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED GREENFIELD ZINC SMELTER COMPLEX (1X0.35

MTPA ZINC SMELTER ALONG WITH FUMER PLANT), 2X90 MW CAPTIVE POWER PLANT AND 35 MW WHRB AT

GIDC DOSWADA, TALUKA SONGADH, DISTRICT TAPI, GUJARAT Table of Contents

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad TC-I

Table of Contents

Chapter Title Page

Table of Contents TC-I

List of Figures TC-II

List of Tables TC-II

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Methodological approach of the Study

3.0 Analysis and Interpretation of Data

4.0 Major Finding and Inferences

5.0 Suggestions and Implications for HZL to Introduce CSR/Proposed

CER Activities

List of Annexures

Annexure – I - Household Survey Questionnaire 55

Annexure – II - Village Profile Format 69

Annexure – III - FGD Format 74

Annexure – IV - In-Depth Interview Schedule 76

Annexure – V - Village Wise Land-Use Data 78

Annexure – VI - Village Wise Demographic Details 83

Annexure – VII - Village Wise Educational Facilities in the Rural Study

Area 88

Annexure – VIII - Village Wise Health Facilities in the Rural Study Area 93

Annexure – IX - Village Wise Drinking Water Facilities 98

Annexure – X - Village Wise Communication Infrastructure Details 103

Annexure – XI - Rural Study Area Road Connectivity 108

Annexure – XII - The Available Drainage Facilities in the Rural Study

Area 113

Annexure – XIII - The Available Banking Facilities in the Rural Study Area 118 Annexure – XIV - The Rural Area Village Wise List of Power Supply Details 123 Annexure – XV HZL’s CSR Policy

SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT - SIA STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED GREENFIELD ZINC SMELTER COMPLEX (1X0.35

MTPA ZINC SMELTER ALONG WITH FUMER PLANT), 2X90 MW CAPTIVE POWER PLANT AND 35 MW WHRB AT

GIDC DOSWADA, TALUKA SONGADH, DISTRICT TAPI, GUJARAT Table of Contents

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad TC-II

List of Figures

Figure Title Page

1 Index Map C1-15 2 Study Area Map of 10 Kms Radius from the Project Boundary C1-16 3 Google Imagery of 10 Kms Radius from The Project Boundary C1-17 4 Proposed Site Photographs C1-18 5 Livestock in the Study Area C1-34 6 Overhead Drinking Water Source in Kikakue Village C1-35 7 Social Expert Visit in Ukhalda Village Sub Post Office C1-37

List of Tables

Tables Title Page

1 Environment Setting s of the Project C1-13

2 Village Wise Population Details C1-19

3 Land Use Pattern in the Study Area C1-21

4 Land use Break Up Based On IRS RS-2 LISS IV FX DATA C1-25

5 Distribution of Population C1-27

6 Distribution of Population by Social Structure C1-28

7 Distribution of Literate and Literacy Rates C1-28

8 Occupation Structure C1-29

9 Economic Category Wise Distribution of Workers C1-30

10 Educational Facilities in the Study Area C1-32

11 Health Facilities in the Study Area C1-33

12 Source of Drinking Water Facility Available in number of villages

in the study area C1-35

13 Communication Infrastructure in the Study Area C1-36

14 Road Connectivity in Study Area C1-38

15 Available Drainage Facilities in the Study Area C1-39

16 Available Banking Facilities in the Study area C1-40

17 Availability of Power Supply in the Study Area C1-40

18 Village Wise Agricultural Commodities (First, Second and Third) C1-41

19 Capital Investment / Additional Capital Investment / (In Rs)

Project Wise Slabs Percentages C1-50

20 The Proposed CER Budget for Greenfield Project Based on the

Project Cost C1-52

21 Proposed Corporate Environment Responsibility Budget for

Three Years C1-52

22 Village Wise / Unit Wise Proposed CSR Activities C1-53

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

M/s. Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) is India’s largest and world’s second largest

zinc-lead miner and engaged in the mining and smelting of zinc, lead and silver

metal in India. The Company's operations include five Zinc-Lead mines, over four

zinc smelters, a lead smelter, a zinc-lead smelter, seven sulphuric acid plants, a

silver refinery plant and over six captive power plants in the state of Rajasthan.

In addition, the Company also has Zinc, Lead, Silver processing and refining

facilities in the State of Uttarakhand. HZL also has wind power plants in the

States of Rajasthan, Gujarat, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra. It has a

metal production capacity of over one million tons per annum with its key Lead-

Zinc mines in Rampura Agucha and Sindesar Khurd, and smelting complexes in

Debari, Chanderiya and Dariba, all in the state of Rajasthan.

HZL has now proposed to set up one of the State of the Art Zinc Smelter Complex

with proposed capacity of 1x0.35 MTPA of Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant,

2X90 MW of Captive Power Plant (CPP) and 35 MW Waste Heat Recovery Boiler

(WHRB) at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat.

TOR Points

Under the provisions of the EIA Notification 2006 as amended, the Standard TOR

for preparing environment impact assessment report and environment

management plan for obtaining prior environment clearance is prescribed with

public consultation.

3. (iii) If expansion project, details of existing products with capacities and

whether adequate land is available for expansion, reference of earlier EC if any.

3. (x) Expansion/modernization proposals:

A. Copy of all the Environmental Clearance(s) including Amendments thereto

obtained for the project from MOEF/SEIAA shall be attached as an Annexure. A

certified copy of the latest Monitoring Report of the Regional Office of the Ministry

of Environment and Forests as per circular dated 30th May, 2012 on the status of

compliance of conditions stipulated in all the existing environmental clearances

including Amendments shall be provided. In addition, status of compliance of

Consent to Operate for the ongoing, existing operation of the project from SPCB

shall be attached with the EIA-EMP report.

b. In case the existing project has not obtained environmental clearance, reasons

for not taking EC under the provisions of the EIA Notification 1994 and/or EIA

Notification 2006 shall be provided. Copies of Consent to Establish/No Objection

Certificate and Consent to Operate (in case of units operating prior to EIA

Notification 2006, CTE and CTO of FY 2005-2006) obtained from the SPCB shall

be submitted. Further, compliance report to the conditions of consents from the

SPCB shall be submitted.

4. (Xiii) R&R details in respect of land in line with state Government policy

6. (Xi) Socio-economic status of the study area.

11. Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC)

i. Adequate funds (at least 2.5 of the project cost) shall be earmarked towards

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-2

the Enterprise Social Commitment based on Public Hearing issues and item-wise

details along with time bound action plan shall be included. Socio-economic

development activities need to be elaborated upon.

As per Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification dated 14th September

2006, proposed project falls under category- ‘A’ of project activity 3(a)

metallurgical industries (ferrous & non-ferrous) and requires prior Environmental

Clearance (EC) to be obtained from Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate

Change (MoEF & CC) before the commencement of ground activity.

The application No: IA/GJ/IND/176971/2020 for prior EC (Form-1 and Pre-

Feasibility Report) for the proposed project has been submitted to MoEF & CC on

14th December 2020 and same was reviewed by the Expert Appraisal Committee

(Industry-I) through the video conferencing meeting held on 30th December 2020

to prescribe Terms of Reference (TORs) for the preparation of EIA/EMP report.

Standard TOR along with specific TOR has been issued by MoEF & CC vide letter

reference F. No. J-11011/288/2020-IA.II (I) dated 22nd December 2020.

M/s. Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) proposes to set-up a greenfield Smelter

Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive

Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB in 165.6 ha (409.2 acres) of area, which includes

facilities like zinc smelter, sulphuric acid plant, calcine leaching & purification

plant, zinc electrolysis, melting & casting unit, zinc powder plant, dross milling

plant, cadmium plant, captive power plant, WHRB, railway siding, raw material

storage areas, waste storage areas, truck parking facilities, admin & canteen

buildings, effluent treatment plant, sewage treatment plant, utilities such as

water reservoir, storm water pond and fuel, etc. with the state of the art

environment friendly technology. The proposed project will be located in Gujarat

Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District

Tapi, Gujarat.

The proposed Zinc Smelter Complex will be established within 165.60 ha of

industrial area, allotted by Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) on

16th February, 1995 to Sterlite Communication at GIDC Doswada, Taluka

Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat. Sterlite Communication is in the possession of

land and request has been submitted to Govt. of Gujarat for change of land

entitlement for 165.60 ha of land to Hindustan Zinc Ltd.

In the proposed land, earlier in year 1995 EC & NoC for Manufacturing of

newsprint (6250 MT/month) and printing and writing paper (4167 MT/month) was

obtained and site work initiated was stopped due to some unavoidable

circumstances.

The proposed zinc smelter will be installed with hydro-metallurgical smelting

process is a Roast, Leach and Electro-winning process along with Fumer plant and

coal based CPP. The memorandum of understanding (MoU) was made between

Government of Gujarat and Mr. Hindustan Zinc Limited, the company directly or

through its subsidiary is inter alia interested in setting up a new Zinc Smelter

Plant at Dosawada, Tapi district, Gujarat. The company has planned the

investment of Rs. 10, 000 crores for the Zinc Smelter Plant in phased manner.

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-3

The investment in the new Zinc Smelter Plant project will accelerate the economic

and industrial development of the state and generating direct and indirect

employment to the tune of 5000 people. The project will help in setting up any

ancillary facilities in and around it which will provide the spin of benefits to the

economy and will help livelihood around 50000 people. It is amply evident that

CSR is integral to and at the core of the company’s philosophy.

Community Relations

Hindustan Zinc Limited Corporate Social Responsibility aims at enhancing the

quality of the life of the communities where its operations are based. All the CSR

initiatives are implemented to drive positive and sustainable change in building

resilient communities. The CSR Initiatives at HZL gives prime importance to

inclusive growth and equitable development of the community.

CSR Philosophy of the Company

At Hindustan Zinc Limited, inclusive socio-economic development of communities

is an integral part of business. HZL is impacting lives of about 5 Lac people

through various community development initiatives. Primarily, the Corporate

Social Responsibility initiatives at HZ are rooted in 189 villages near its operations

including 184 in Rajasthan & five in Uttarakhand; covering around 66 Gram

Panchayats in 12 Tehsils across Udaipur, Rajsamand, Chittorgarh, Bhilwara &

Ajmer. The community development programs are aligned to the community

needs, National priorities and the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals.

The projects are carried out in close partnerships with the Government, local

communities and credible civil society organizations. The CSR policies and

systems are framed and implemented in an efficient manner to ensure

deployment of resources to deliver sustainable impact at grassroot level

During the last three years, HZL have spent 354 Crores (FY’ 2018: INR 92.18

Crores, FY’ 2019: INR130.20 Crores and FY’ 20: INR 131.65 Crores) for the

upliftment of community through various development programs that are

impacting the lives of over 5,00,000 beneficiaries. The Efforts of all these years

have resulted into much deeper engagement with communities and designing the

programs based on the need and impact assessment that is conducted

periodically. Due diligence, accountability and transparency around the execution

of all CSR projects are constantly undertaken to ensure the integrity of the

implementation process. In addition, the Company commissions a comprehensive

baseline and impact study by a third party, at all its locations, once every three

years.

At HZL, Corporate social responsibility is not just about touching lives positively,

it is also about leaving a lasting positive impact in the lives of people in

communities and in the society at large. Its conviction is that the consistent

efforts that are spread over the last few years - to put in place, effective policies,

systems and people – has ensured that the CSR investments are yielding results

that can be considered as a benchmark for any company that is interested in

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-4

leaving positive social impact and strong governance footprints across its

operations. All flagship CSR projects are long term and defined with clear

measurable indicators & impact parameters.

Vision

To enhance the quality of life and economic well-being of communities around

HZL operations.

Mission

Facilitate collaborative development for improving the quality of life of people at

large, particularly in the neighborhood and state for achieving business goals and

reputation management.

Goals

To positively and holistically impact the quality of life of the communities living

around areas of operation.

To work in partnership through a multi-stakeholder approach for innovatively,

effectively and efficiently addressing development challenges.

To emerge as a thought leader, creating benchmarks of good practices in CSR

across Gujarat & Rajasthan and the country at large

The Company’s CSR policy specifies 7 thematic areas strengthening 360-degree

engagement in communities and sustaining social license to operate. The thematic

areas that we focus on are Education, Sustainable Livelihoods, Women’s

Empowerment, Health, Water & Sanitation, Sports & Culture, Environment and

Community Development.

Education Khushi Anganwadi Program, Child Care Project and any other similar

programs for early childhood;

Shiksha Sambal Project in identified schools;

Scholarships and financial assistance to meritorious students;

Unchi Udaan -IIT coaching program;

Setting up of Model Anganwadis/ Nandghar;

Support to educational initiatives;

Support for the differently abled;

Company run schools.

Khushi Anganwadi Program – the project completed has its fifth year of

project cycle with a widespread coverage at 3100+ AWCs & directly reached out

to 58,000 children. It embarked on identifying needs & providing support to ICDS

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-5

system & community through improving functioning of Anganwadis and helping to

provide early childhood care interventions at centers.

With a view to augment community engagement at anganwadis, community

contribution is inbuilt in the program design and have seen positive results

through contributions made by local panchayats & community member etc. This

set up a strong pillar of community led- development of Anganwadi centers which

will also help in the sustainability of interventions done in these five years.

Extensive trainings are given to Anganwadi staff regularly in all the supportive

interventions for preschool, health & nutrition which were organized. This has

gained tremendous traction and has become a key building block for addressing

malnourishment amongst children (0 to 6 years) at centers.

Nandghar – The NandGhar project focuses on the Anganwadi Centres and re-

imagines them into state of art centres which find a place of pride in

communities. The Nandghars provide a child safe and friendly learning

environment with amenities like safe drinking water, uninterrupted supply of solar

power, digital learning facilities, etc. Many Nandghars are also used (post AWC

hours) for providing entrepreneurial skill training for women through another

flagship project ‘Sakhi’. Out of 3100+ Khushi Anganwadis, 314 centers have

converted into Nandghars.

Shiksha Sambal – Shiksha Sambal project aims at quality teaching of Science,

Maths and English (SEM) subjects and is now reaching out to more than 7000+

students in 60+ Government schools. The project places additional teachers into

schools and builds a strong conceptual foundation among students using

innovative learning techniques & activities such as group learning, worksheets,

learning camps, science fairs, etc.

Mindspark Learning Lab is a personalised adaptive learning program which

provides customized and adaptive cloud-based learning solution to strengthen

language and Mathematics learning for classes 1 to 8 started last year.

Unchi Udaan – While HZL have been working on education for a long time, about

four years ago, it took a bolder step. And this bold idea was to try and put

children from HZL’s villages into the very best engineering colleges of the

country. Unchi Udaan project is built on the foundation of Shiksha Sambal and

creates an opportunity for high performing students from Government school of

operational areas to enter engineering institutions of national repute. The project

provides coaching support to select group of students. Some of the impacts from

over the last two years are –

2019: Selection of 5 students in IIT Gandhinagar, IIT Dhanbad, IIT Patna, NIT

Jamshedpur, NIT Jaipur. 12 students in Rank 1 college engineering college of

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-6

Rajasthan & remaining selections in other State engineering collages. Two female

scholars secured TADA Merit with Rank 1 and Rank 7

Jeevan Tarang – The program has completed four years and reaching 700+

Persons with Disabilities (PwD). The focus is on empowering Persons with

Disabilities to become contributing members of their families. HZL have taken the

first step and is catering to the educational needs of PwD. The difference that has

been made through this program has been in terms of achieving improved

learning of 700+ children having Visual impairment and hearing impairment. Out

of the above, around 600 have been educated on Indian Sign Language through a

disciplined curriculum and 100 visually impaired in technology. The project also

aims to spread overall awareness and sensitisation about the disabled among the

public and employers to build an equal and inclusive society. Impacts from the

program:

- Improvement in teacher student classroom communication & interaction

- Active usage of sign language by teachers in the classrooms has led to

accessible education

- Workshops on women’s health (menstrual hygiene & sexual violence) has

led to the girl student being able to share and seek support from family

members for better health

- Sensitization session with parents of deaf- awareness on career prospects,

gender equality and issue of child marriage

Scholarship Support for higher education – From last several years HZL has been

supporting 100+ deserving students of Rajasthan for engineering studies through

the ‘Yashad-Sumedha Scholarship’ program. The Company also provides full

scholarship for girls from villages around its operations to pursue higher

education at the Vedanta Post-Graduate Girl’s College, Ringus. Currently, 98 girls

are studying in the college.

Sustainable Livelihoods

Samadhan – This is the Company’s flagship program for on-farm sustainable

livelihood, reaching out to thousands of farmers & families through agriculture

and livestock interventions till date. The foundational element of the project is the

formation of Farmer Interest Groups in villages based on their unique

circumstances such as types of land holding and farm activity to help them to

collectively overcome challenges related to market access and product pricing.

Some of the key efforts carried out during the years focused on improving soil

health, quality of agriculture seeds & horticulture plants, improving breeds of

animals like goats, buffaloes & cows and improving farming practices &

technology.

Skill development – HZL upskills the youth with a key focus on girls at our Skill

and Entrepreneurship Development Institutes at Dariba and Agucha in Rajsamand

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-7

and Bhilwara. This year these skilling institutes will be expanded to other some

other locations of HZL as well. Market linked programs are being offered ensuring

employability.

Women’s Empowerment

Promotion and formation of Sakhi Self-help groups;

Skill building of rural women in various trades;

Promotion of Sakhi Production Centers.

The flagship project is geared towards mobilizing rural women into self-help

groups (SHGs) and developing their capacities around leadership, skill

development, savings and entrepreneurship. Under this project, there are 2200+

SHGs, 194 Village Organizations with a membership of about 27000 with total

savings of Rs 11.25 Crore and cumulative loans of Rs 37.09 Crore including credit

of Rs 6.44 Crore leveraged from banks. 23482 women availed loans from SHGs

for various purposes like livelihood activities, education, debt redemption and

house hold consumption. 700+ women have started or expanded their micro-

enterprises. To provide sustainable livelihood opportunities to these SHG women-

Spice, pulses & pickle based micro-enterprise units have been established in

Chanderiya, Agucha, and Kayad location engaging hundreds of women.

Leadership skills of more than 500 women are being developed through various

trainings & capacity building programs, these women are now working as

community cadres.

Health, Water & Sanitation

Organizing health and awareness camps;

Providing financial support to needy/poor patients;

Build/enhance/support hospital and health initiatives;

Sanitation, drinking water facilities in rural areas;

Initiatives on eradicating malnutrition and reducing child mortality;

Company run hospitals.

Availing Primary Health Care services has always remained a challenge in the

rural areas. As a result, cases of poor health of women, malnourishment among

children and death from preventable diseases is always high. The need of the

hour is thus a two-pronged approach – first to bring quality health care services

to doorsteps of the needy and second to promote healthcare awareness among

communities.

Mobile Health Vans (MHVs) – HZL currently have 4 MHVs covering more than

110 villages at 4 of its locations in Rajasthan & Uttrakhand. The health care

facilities include; OPD, special health camps, Awareness sessions through IEC

activities (Information, Education, and Communication), and Lab tests. Nearly 1

lac patients are reached out through OPDs every year. This year the MHV

program will be expanded to other some other locations of HZL.

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-8

Other Health Initiatives –

The six Company run hospitals treats over one lac external patients

through the year.

Drinking Water Provisioning

Drinking Water Provisioning – water is among the most important need of

communities, especially in a state like Rajasthan. The Company has always

supported people in having adequate access to drinking water. During the year,

the Company has continued interventions in water space with an objective to

provide clean, safe and affordable drinking water to the community through the

installation of hub and spoke model community RO plants.

Water Harvesting

For water harvesting, HZL in association with Urban Development Trust (UIT) had

taken up the project of deepening the Fatehsagar Lake by desalting when it is

dry. This deepening has enhanced the capacity of the lake by 1 Lakh cubic

meters.

Sports & Culture

HZL Football Academy;

Supporting sports tournaments for community;

Promoting various aspects of folk and tribal cultures;

Organizing/ supporting cultural events;

Sponsorships for promotion of art and heritage.

Hindustan Zinc has initiated a massive program directed at achieving grassroots

development as well as excellence in football in Rajasthan.

ZF Schools (Football for All) – Uses football as a tool for social

development and ensuring young kids have a platform to express

themselves through football. With the philosophy that “every child should

have an opportunity to play”, ZF has set up 12 community football where

350+ boys and girls receive football training by certified coaches;

ZF Academy (Football for Excellence) – Nurturing talent to develop future

football stars for the country. At the heart of this initiative is a Residential

Academy with world-class facilities at Zawar and the country’s first ever

‘technology-hinged football training’ centre. The Academy is currently

training 40 children where they are coached using innovative training

programs with equal emphasis on learning and playing;

Zinc Football Youth Tournament (Football for Talent Hunt): for providing

equal opportunity to 5000+ boys and girls of U15 years age of Rajasthan,

Zinc Football introduced biggest tournament of the state that serves as a

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-9

formal platform for children to be inducted to the ZF academy and to

promote football culture in state. The phase 1 of ZFYT ended last year with

participation in 5 zones of Rajasthan and with 1400+ boys and girls.

Environment

Support for cleaning of lakes, rivers, water treatment;

Environment projects for beautification of lakes & city;

Undertaking plantation and afforestation activities;

Undertaking Safety initiatives for community.

Community Development

Rural development projects of building community-based rural infrastructure like

roads, bridges, culverts, drains, rural electrification, drinking water and

infrastructure.

Creation of an appropriate physical asset for communities is sometimes the most

tangible expression of the company’s commitment towards their continuing

development. Creation of any community asset is taken up through close

consultation with concerned villagers. During the year, several such projects were

undertaken ranging from construction of community halls, classrooms in schools,

roads, bus stands, cremation centers, drains and open-air public spaces in

villages as per need from the community. In addition, water projects like

installation of pipelines, providing water connections, construction of water tanks,

pond deepening, supplying drinking water through tankers, etc. were also

undertaken.

2.0 Methodological Approach of the Study

This part mainly deals with different methods and techniques which are adopted

in carrying the research project. Further it also reveals the gist of information

about techniques and methods of the research plan right from beginning to the

end.

Title of the Study

Social impact Assessment, Need Based Assessment and CER Plan for the

Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with

Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada,

Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat.

Objectives of the Study

The major objective of the study is to understand the socio-economic situation of

the respondents within the project area and making a social impact assessment.

Further the concentration of the study is based on following specific objectives

such as:

1. To study the socio-demographic and economic background of the study

population;

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-10

2. To understand the educational and health status of the respondents;

3. To study the conditions of employability and livelihood of the respondents;

4. To make an attempt to understand the resource assessment of the household

of the respondents;

5. To assess the needs and priorities of the population, resided in the study

area;

6. To reveal the information about the existing CSR activities from the

respondents; and

7. To suggest remedies and measures for inclusion of all the stakeholders in the

developmental spectrum of the setting.

Significance of the Study

In global context the importance of industrial growth is essential for the overall

development of the nation. For this the availability of proper infrastructure is

must, of which the cement production is playing a vital role. The demand of Zinc

Smelter in our country is increasing day by day due to development works in

government as well as in private sectors resulting in vast construction activity in

different fields such as building/village development programmes, housing,

irrigation, concrete roads, dams and hydro power projects as well as

industrialization etc. To fulfill the increased national demand of Zinc Smelter, HZL

proposes for the Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter

along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at

GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat. So the attempt has been

made by the research agency to thoroughly understand the social, economic,

geo-environmental situation in the opinion of respondents, thus making an

attempt to propose the different kinds of need based programmes which can help

in the development of the project affected population. Further, the study results

are going to be used for the action planning of Corporate Social Responsibility

(CSR) activities according to the need and priorities of the project area and also

the study findings will be utilized in the direction of reducing socio-environmental

and economic burdens. Hence it is required to objectively assess the

developmental needs of the local communities and to conduct a socio-economic

baseline survey. The outcome of the need assessment and the baseline survey

would serve as inputs in preparing a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan

for the local population.

Nature and Scope of the Study

The current study is predominantly depended on the primary field experience,

observation and opinion survey from the study area. The social expert and field

investigators team has given opportunity to the concerned respondents to

express both the advantage and disadvantage they have experienced during the

construction and operation of the Zinc smelter plant. Further it is the duty of the

company to consider general population view on developmental initiatives before

putting things into practice. The nature of the study is mainly sample based

socio-economic assessment survey. Here each village, communities and random

households are considered as the respondent therefore each response which was

revealed by the respondent are unique in nature where the values of variables

are representing the views of the group of family members. Hence the research

agency has taken keen interest to choose the population in all the stages

beginning from the study till finalization of the study report. The present study

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-11

will be of great help in understanding the socio-economic conditions of the

population staying in the surroundings of industries. In addition, the study tries to

assess the needs of the population in the study area. Lastly the findings of the

research are beneficial for the future prospectus and policy making.

Focused Group Discussion (FGD)

Focused Group Discussion (FGD) with village opinion leaders was undertaken to

understand the overall scenario of the villages, including the aspirations and

desires of the community. An effort was made to cover participants across caste,

gender, income and age, so as to get a comprehensive and complete Photograph

of the area. In the FGD, major issues pertaining to health, education, women

empowerment, nutrition, hygiene, livelihood, income generating activities, access

to safe drinking water, education, road connectivity, banking facilities, health

facilities, transport facilities, Drainage facilities, livestock, and sports, etc. were

covered.

Survey of Village Infrastructure

Visits were conducted to the Self-Help Groups, schools, anganwadi centers and

health sub-centers in the project affected villages to collect detailed information

about physical as well as social infrastructure, major areas of intervention

required, and to identify specific resource gap prevalent in the institutions of

these villages.

Public Consultation

Community consultation is an internationally and nationally proved and

implemented practice to build a rapport with host community i.e. the people who

are to be affected by the project. This eventually acts as a deterrent towards the

development of the project. Therefore, it is necessary to have consultation with

the various stakeholders and project affected people from the planning stage of

the project. Community consultation was carried out in this project to the extent

possible to minimize probable adverse impact of the project on the project

affected people which is useful during the stage of data analysis. The Community

Consultation process was carried out with the following objectives:

To develop an understanding of the quality of life of the people residing in the

study area;

To ensure enhanced public cooperation due to creation of awareness about

purpose and benefits of the project;

The discussion with the community was through Participatory Rural Appraisal

and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) techniques;

To solicit the views of affected communities/ individuals on social, economic

and environment components and the significance of impacts; and

To serve as an important tool for collecting information about the natural and

the human environments, much of which would never be accessible through

more traditional approaches of data collection.

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-12

Technique used for Community Consultation

The project area people were informed while doing door to door survey to gather

in a place decided mainly by the Sarpanch for consultation venue. Technique

planned for public consultation are discussed below:

Questionnaire Survey: One to One Consultation.

Transect Walk: Along the project boundary with professional from

multidisciplinary team;

Group Consultations: Social and gender group wise consultation;

On-site Rapid Consultation: Interaction with village elders, sarpanch,

community leaders;

PRA Technique: Participatory Technique of appraisal for identification of

problem and potential of project; and

Communities meeting are playing a key role in consultation.

Level 1-Interaction with Community Groups: The interaction with community

groups were planned to conduct in the villages within the project site.

Level 2- On-Site Rapid Consultation- On-site rapid consultation was also planned

to conduct at Dosawada, Nishana, Kumkuva, Kikakui, Pokhran villages and

locations throughout the project area villages. 0.77% of the population belongs to

Scheduled Castes (SC) and 81.84% to Scheduled Tribes (ST). Overall the data of

social stratification reveals that the SC and ST % to population is more than 82%.

A detail tribal development plan will be prepared after public hearing. Many of the

village sarpanches and village people are fear about political influence to

participate in socio-Economic primary field survey. The general conversation and

discussion evolved around their social and cultural practices. The basic objective

of this type of interaction was to develop a perspective on the quality of life of the

people and their general practices. Based on the ground truth analysis and

comparison with secondary data were used to prepare social impact assessment.

The sample household survey questionnaire was given in Annexure-I, village

profile was given in Annexure-II, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) form was

given in Annexure-III and In-depth interview form was given in Annexure-IV.

Analysis of data

The following procedure was adopted for the content analysis of the qualitative

data.

Separating: The responses to a particular question were listed to obtain the

range of responses for all open-ended questions. The responses that were

considered irrelevant under a specific question were moved under the

appropriate question for analysis. During this process, important statements

were extracted for use in the report as reference material;

Screening: In the final screening, for every open-ended question, responses

were coded according to the domains. Some responses could be placed under

more than one domain as a range of views were stated in a single sentence.

After scrutiny, the responses found to be irrelevant were discarded; and

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-13

Summarizing: Similar information sought from different stakeholders was

triangulated to arrive at a conclusion. The results were then summarized for

each issue separately.

Environmental Setting

The environmental setting of the project site is given in Table-1.

TABLE-1

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE

Sr. No. Particulars Details

1 Project Location Zinc Smelter Complex GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

2 Coordinates Latitude: 21o7’56.10”N to 21o9’4.21’N Latitude: 73o31’4.13’E to 73o31’44.58’E

3 Survey No. GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

4 Present land use at the site Industrial (GIDC Land)

5 Elevation above MSL 125 m – 145 m

6 Toposheet No. F43N12 (46G/12) and F43N8 (46G/8)

7 Climatic conditions - Surat Observatory (Nearest IMD station)

Annual maximum temp: 45.6°C Annual minimum temp: 4.4°C Annual total rainfall: 1926 mm Annual predominant wind direction: SW

8 Nearest Highway NH-6, (0.01 km, N)

SH-174 (4.1 km, ESE)

9 Nearest Railway Station Doswada RS (0.05 km, SSW) Ukai RS (3.0 km, E)

10 Nearest Airport Surat (80 km, W)

11 Nearest Port Magdalla (80 km, W) Hazira (90 km, W) Dahej (115.0 km, W)

12 Nearest Village Kumkua (0.4 Km, E) Pokhran (0.7 km, N)

13 Nearest Town/City Songadh Town (3.9 km NE)

14 Nearest District Headquarters Vyara (11.5 km WSW)

15 Hills/Valleys Nil in 15 km radius

16 Monuments Nil in 15 km radius

17 Archaeologically important places Songadh Fort (5.21 Km ENE)

18 Water bodies Mindhola or Madav River Dam (0.3 km, S)

Ukai Dam/Reservoir (9.3 km, NE)

Jhankhri Nadi (9.8 km, SSW) Girra Nadi (11.2 km, S) Tapi River (12.4 km, N)

19 Defense installation Nil in 15 km radius

20 State & National Boundary Gujarat/Maharashtra state boundary (5.2 km, E)

21 Reserved/Protected forest RF Near Pokhran Village (0.9 km, N) RF Near Plant Boundary (0.9 km, NW) RF Near Mandal Village (1.8 km, W) RF Near Devalpada Village (3.5 km, SW) RF Near Khanjar Village (3.6 km, S)

RF Near Kikakui Village (4.3 km, NW)

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-14

Sr. No. Particulars Details

RF Near Amplipada Village (4.9 km, N) RF Near Chimkua Village (6.8 km, E) RF Near Ghodchit Village (7.3 km, S) RF Near Gunasada Village (7.5 km, NE) RF Near Chachar Bhunda Village (7.6 km, NE)

RF Near Chachar Bhunda Village (7.7 km, NE) RF Near RF Bhadpada Village (7.8 km, SE) RF Near Navi Ukai Village (7.9 km, NNE) RF Near Bhimpua Village (8.1 km, NNE) RF Near Ghodchit Village (8.3 km, S) RF Near Navi Ukai Village (8.5 km, NE)

RF Near Godirwala Village (9.4 km, SSE)

RF Near Vadpada Village (9.7 km, SE) RF Near Gopalpura Village (9.8 km, SE) RF Near Katiskuva Village (9.9 km, NW) RRF Near Moghwan Village (10.3 km, SSW) RF Near Pervad Village (11.6 km, SSW) RF Near Vadala Village (11.8 km, NNE)

RF Near Vajhaphali Village (12.4 km, SE) RF Near Chikhli Village (12.5 km, NW) RF Near Limbi Village (13.0 km, N) RF Near Chinchbordi Village (13.1 km, SSW) RF Near Taparwada Village (13.3 km, SE) RF Near Jamne Village (13.4 km, NE) RF Near Kapadwan Village (14.7 km, SW)

RF Near Chachar Nandsal Village (14.9 km, ENE)

22 Protected areas as per Wildlife Protection Act, 1972

(Biospheres, Tiger Reserves, Elephant Reserves, National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries, Conservation

Reserves, and Community Reserves)

Purna Wildlife Sanctuary ESZ (10.7 km, S) Purna Wildlife Sanctuary boundary (14.2 km, S)

23 List of Industries Girnar Stone Quarry-Songadh (2.0 km, NE) Vijay Stone Quarry-Songadh (3.1 km, NE) Ukai Thermal Power Station (6.6 km, NE)

JK Paper Mills, Songadh (7.4 km, NE)

24 Seismicity Seismic zone-III as per IS-1893 (Part-1) - 2002

Description of Proposed Project Site

The proposed site is fairly flat with slight undulation with elevation varying from

145 m in north sloping towards south with elevation of 125 m. The site is

covered with natural shrubs and grass, few big trees are present in the

western side of the plant premises and at exit gate. Sterlite Paper Limited has

earlier constructed few buildings and facilities such as ware house, mill,

admin block, power house, transmission lines, drain water network and

security check post. The industry was operated for about 2 years. However, due to

some reasons the plant was shut down since 1997. Two Bore wells exist

within the plant site. There are no natural nallas observed in the proposed

project site.

Social Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-15

The location map and study area of 10 km radius of the project site is shown in

Figure-1 and Figure-2 respectively. Google imagery of the study area and the

proposed project site photographs are shown in Figure-3 and Figure-4

respectively.

FIGURE-1

INDEX MAP

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad C1-16

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

FIGURE-2

STUDY AREA MAP OF 10 RADIUS FROM THE PROJECT BOUNDARY

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 17

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

FIGURE-3

GOOGLE IMAGERY OF 10 RADIUS FROM THE PROJECT BOUNDARY

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 18

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

FIGURE-4

PROPOSED SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 19

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Research Design

The design used for the present study is descriptive in nature. The research

agency aims to present the information of the study area as it is and in a

describing manner, with no intervention made by the Project Proponent. Hence

the applied design is descriptive design which is apt for the present study.

Descriptive research is a study designed to represent the participants in an

accurate way. The three main ways to collect this information are: Observational,

defined as a method of viewing and recording the participants. Case study,

defined as an in-depth study of an individual or group of individuals.

Sample Size and Technique

With the help of officially published statistical data from the Rural Development

and Panchayat Raj Department (RDPRD) of State of Gujarat and Census of India

2011 the research agency has chosen random villages on sample basis which

comes under the study area. Out of these villages equal importance has been

given to choose the sample size in proportionate to the size of household and

population size in each village based on proportionate random sampling design.

From the ninety-one villages and Songhar municipality Urban area the research

agency has officially identified thirty-one thousand two hundred five (31205)

households in which some of the villages have large population as well as

households and in other villages both population and households are scattered.

The village wise population details are given in Table-2.

TABLE-2

VILLAGE WISE POPULATION DETAILS

Sr.No. Name of Village

No.of

House

Holds

Total

Male

Total

Female

Total

Population

SC

Population

ST

Population

0-3 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

1 Nishana 393 919 884 1803 3 1775

2 Achhalva 134 332 312 644 0 642

3 Sadadkuva 297 661 662 1323 0 1317

4 Pokhran 103 308 243 551 0 410

5 Kikakui 552 1291 1337 2628 0 2608

6 Mandal 467 1084 1124 2208 0 2189

7 Dosvada 810 1988 1983 3971 6 3950

8 Kumkuva 292 745 745 1490 0 1476

9 Rupvada 159 339 347 686 0 671

Sub Total 3207 7667 7637 15304 9 15038

3-7 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

10 Jhadpati 71 176 186 362 0 353

11 Galkhadi 143 317 312 629 0 629

12 Moti Khervan 544 1201 1308 2509 0 2502

13 Vagda 353 794 838 1632 20 1483

14 Dumda 479 1078 1086 2164 0 2111

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 20

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Sr.No. Name of Village

No.of

House

Holds

Total

Male

Total

Female

Total

Population

SC

Population

ST

Population

15 Amlipada 254 586 587 1173 0 1173

16 Kelai 287 636 649 1285 0 1285

17 Kavla 132 261 267 528 0 520

18 Amli 310 659 660 1319 3 1316

19 Champavadi 216 429 484 913 0 908

20 Chakalia 312 787 751 1538 0 1535

21 Khambhala 129 343 369 712 0 703

22 Chapaldhara 71 138 151 289 0 283

23 Raniamba 541 1382 1325 2707 8 2226

24 Balamrai 49 104 115 219 0 219

25 Tokarva (Segupada) 769 1671 1719 3390 7 3272

26 Tokarva (Jamankuva) 158 337 336 673 0 656

27 Kakad Kuva 157 368 388 756 0 756

28 Kharsi 305 807 713 1520 0 1477

29 Devalpada 94 207 214 421 0 421

30 Kanala 215 553 587 1140 0 1138

31 Chorvad 386 905 958 1863 0 1861

32 Chikhli Khadka 285 629 622 1251 0 1189

33 Junvan 168 358 390 748 0 747

34 Galkuva 372 833 892 1725 0 1710

35 Bedpada 116 271 282 553 0 553

36 Kanadevi 61 124 123 247 0 247

37 Rampura Kanadevi 140 287 297 584 0 576

38 Nana Bandharpada 124 311 297 608 0 606

39 Jharali 171 389 382 771 0 769

40 Kukradungri 128 282 286 568 0 565

41 Kukadjhar 69 151 157 308 0 307

42 Vadpada P Tokarva 110 257 248 505 0 505

43 Ghodchit 273 651 651 1302 0 1276

44 Bandharpada 321 729 746 1475 32 1415

45 Songadh (M) 5331 13518 12997 26515 712 5792

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

46 Virpur 216 466 464 930 15 874

Sub Total 13860 32995 32837 65832 797 43958

7-10 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

47 Dhajamba 634 1562 1584 3146 0 3126

48 Veljhar 199 426 448 874 0 871

49 Vajharda 525 1237 1168 2405 1 2369

50 Bedvan P Bhensrot 137 300 304 604 0 597

51 Ukhalda 643 1577 1547 3124 16 3051

52 Pipalkuva 571 1320 1370 2690 0 2677

53 Nani Khervan 191 452 466 918 0 918

54 Ghoda 353 810 793 1603 0 1600

55 Bhimpura 753 1701 1688 3389 183 1935

56 Gunsada 1233 2694 2634 5328 16 4665

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 21

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Sr.No. Name of Village

No.of

House

Holds

Total

Male

Total

Female

Total

Population

SC

Population

ST

Population

57 Bedi 328 737 759 1496 0 1487

58 Agasvan 499 1054 1129 2183 0 2112

59 Gaisavar 126 301 274 575 0 570

60 Chimkuva 265 586 591 1177 0 1173

61 Nani Bhurvan 19 34 38 72 0 72

62 Medhsingi 216 543 540 1083 0 1079

63 Khokhsa 62 125 135 260 0 258

64 Moti Bhurvan 46 108 107 215 0 212

65 Hiravadi 307 589 643 1232 0 1228

66 Amba 203 491 553 1044 0 1042

67 Gatadi 181 364 379 743 0 741

68 Tichakia 138 324 320 644 0 635

69 Hanmantiya 226 516 558 1074 0 1074

70 Mahudi 97 204 209 413 0 413

71 Monghvan 431 1035 1048 2083 0 2075

72 Maiyali 168 360 377 737 0 735

73 Sandhkuva 155 366 381 747 0 744

74 Tarsadi 197 488 486 974 0 970

75 Kakad Kuva P Umarda 169 344 365 709 0 707

76 Bedvan P Umarda 146 289 304 593 0 593

77 Vadpada P Umarda 269 585 616 1201 9 1177

78 Chakvan 211 404 420 824 0 824

79 Borkuva 191 455 423 878 2 846

80 Kalaghat 151 347 347 694 0 690

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

81 Katiskuva Najik 297 623 667 1290 8 1229

82 Sarkuva 224 527 537 1064 0 1042

83 Katgadh 85 170 202 372 0 372

84 Bedkuva Najik 262 612 632 1244 0 1002

85 Kanpura 782 1725 1674 3399 64 2738

86 Tadkuva 473 1057 1102 2159 0 1533

87 Chikhli 558 1279 1318 2597 8 2465

88 Vaghjhari 159 359 364 723 0 716

89 Chikhalda 404 879 929 1808 0 1803

90 Saraiya 318 686 755 1441 0 1403

91 Pervad 264 655 622 1277 0 1274

Uchchhai taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

92 Pankhri 272 577 606 1183 0 1173

Sub Total 14138 31877 32412 64289 307 60016

Grand Total 31205 72539 72886 145425 1113 119012

Source: Census of India 2011.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 22

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Tools of Data Collection

The study is mainly dependent on field data which is considered as first hand or

primary information. Hence, it is very essential to seek the information from the

respondents for formulating further programs and activities based on their needs.

The research agency has utilized the structured interview schedule as tool

according to the objectives. Further the interview schedule had been classified

under different sub-parts such as Socio-demographic and economic details,

household details, educational and health status, information on employability

and livelihood, environmental issues and finally existing CSR activities along with

the need assessment as the major areas of the interview schedule. The schedule

also provided enormous space for the field investigators to record their

observations in the process of data collection hence giving a wider scope for

qualitative data analysis.

Sources of Data Collection

In any empirical research study, it may not be possible to bring all the needed

information together with the help either primary or secondary information itself.

Hence, the research agency has inculcated both the primary as well as the

secondary sources for the preparation of final research report. However, the

study was predominated in terms of empirical in its nature and the primary

source has been largely materialized throughout the research and the secondary

information has also used according to the need and relevance of the study. The

tools which are used for the collection of primary information were self-structured

interview schedule, participatory observation methods, Focus Group Discussion

(FGD) and the field experiences of the investigators. In secondary data different

sources such as e-sources, census data, district gazetteers and other text books

were used for preparation of the report.

3.0 Analysis and Interpretation of Data

The empirical information collected from the study area was systematically edited

and verified on day to day basis then the information was coded, classified and

entered the excel sheets. Further data was compiled into tables by using the

excel software in simple percentile manner so as to be understood by the readers

easily. The analyzed data were interpreted in accordance to the objectives of the

study and inferences were drawn to reach the logical conclusion.

Land Use Studies

Studies on land use aspects of eco-system play important roles for identifying

sensitive issues, if any, and taking appropriate actions for maintaining the

ecological balance in the development of the region.

Objectives

The objectives of land use studies are:

To determine the present land use pattern;

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 23

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

To analyze the impacts on land use due to plant activities in the study area;

and

To give recommendations for optimizing the future land use pattern vis-a-vis

growth of plant activities in the study area and its associated impact

Methodology

For the study of land use, literature review of various secondary sources such as

District Census Handbooks, regional maps regarding topography, zoning

settlement, industry, forest etc., were taken. The data was collected from various

sources like District Census Handbook, Revenue records, state and central

government offices and Survey of India (SOI) Topo-sheets and also through

primary field surveys.

Land use Based on Secondary Data

Based on the census report, 10-km radial distance around the project

boundary has been considered in the study. These areas were studied in detail to get the idea of land use pattern in the study area. The land use

census data 2011 is presented in Table-.3. The village wise land use classification data is presented in Annexure-V.

TABLE-3

LAND USE PATTERN IN THE STUDY AREA

Sr. No

Particulars of Land use (in Hectares) 0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km (%)

1 Forest Area 1177.90 844.92 1881.69 3904.51 8.86

2 Land under Cultivation

a) Irrigation Land 356.18 2120.25 4199.71 6676.14 15.15

b) Un Irrigated Land 3512.32 7661.93 9116.73 20290.98 46.05

c) Land Under Miscellaneous Tree Crops etc. Area 0.00 14.43 166.79 181.22 0.41

3 Area not Available for Cultivation

a)Area under Non-Agricultural Uses 22.59 305.26 628.21 956.06 2.17

b)Barren & Un-cultivable Land Area 305.05 5066.97 589.22 5961.24 13.53

c)Permanent Pastures and Other Grazing Land Area 425.22 909.11 1253.43 2587.76 5.87

4 Cultivable Waste Land Area 51.10 140.10 283.22 474.42 1.08

5

Fallows Land other than Current

Fallows Area (in Hectares) 39.30 151.03 356.67 547.00 1.24

6 Current Fallows Area (in Hectares) 130.16 129.48 631.53 891.17 2.02

7 Urban Area 0.00 1597.00 0.00 1597.00 3.62

Total Geographical Area 6019.82 18940.48 19107.20 44067.50 100.00

Source: Census of India –2011

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 24

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Forest Land

Forest land means land of any description falling with in any area and includes

unclassified forests, un demarcated forests, existing or deemed forests, protected

forests, reserved forests, Sanctuaries and National parks. The revenue forest land

under the study area consists 3904.51 ha (8.86%) of the total geographic area.

Land under Cultivation

Altogether 27148.34 ha cultivable land (irrigated, un-irrigated and Land Under

miscellaneous tree crops etc.) was observed in the study area. The irrigated land

admeasures to about 6676.14 ha in the study area which works out to be 15.15% of

total study area. The un-irrigated land admeasures about 20290.98 ha and works out

to about 46.05% of the total study area. Land under miscellaneous tree crops area

admeasures to about 181.22 ha and works out 0.41 % of the total study area.

Land not available for Cultivation

The land not available for cultivation is 21.57% of the total study area, which

includes area of land with scrub, land without scrub, Permanent Pastures, quarry,

mining area, rocky/ stony and barren area.

Cultivable Waste Land

All lands available for cultivation whether not taken up for cultivation or taken up for

cultivation once but not cultivated during the current year and the last five years or

more in succession for one reason or the other. Such lands may be either wholly or

partly covered with shrubs and jungles, which are not put to any use. Land once

cultivated but not cultivated for five years in succession are also included in this

category. The study area comprises about 1.08% cultivable wastelands.

Fallows Land other than Current Fallows land

This includes all land which was taken up for cultivation but is temporarily out of

Cultivation for a period of not less than one year and not more than five years.

The fallows land is 1.24% in the study area.

Current Fallows land

This represents cropped area which is kept fallow during the current year. The

current fallows land is 2.02% in the total study area.

Urban Area

An urban area is a location characterized by high human population density and

vast human-built features in comparison to the areas surrounding it. Urban areas

may be cities, towns and towns or conurbations, but the term is not commonly

extended to rural settlements such as villages and hamlets. The urban area under

the study area consists 1597.00 ha (3.62%) of the total geographic area. The

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 25

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

land use breakup based on the IRS RS-2 LISS IV FX DATA is given in Table 1.4

TABLE-4

LANDUSE BREAK UP BASED ON IRS RS-2 LISS IV FX DATA

Sr.

No Landuse

Area (sq.

Km) %

1

BUILT- UP LAND

A. Settlement 18.13 4.9

B. Industrial area 9.62 2.6

2 WATERBODIES

A. Tank / River / Major canal etc. 17.76 4.8

3 FOREST

A. Scrub forest 38.48 10.4

4

CROP LAND

A. Single crop 197.95 53.5

B. Double crop 37.74 10.2

5

WASTELANDS

A. Land with scrub 21.46 5.8

B. Land without scrub 6.66 1.8

C. Stone quarry 12.21 3.3

D. Ash pond 4.44 1.2

E. Sheet rock area 7.03 1.9

TOTAL 370 100

Source: IRS RS-2 LISS IV FX DATA

Both topo-sheets and satellite imagery were taken for field verification and a

transverse plan using existing road network was made to cover as many

representative sample areas as possible to observe the broad land use features

and to adjust the sample areas according to field conditions. As per village

administrative atlas Gujarat 2011 census, the villages more than 50% covered 9

to 10 kms of the study area the total village land was considered in secondary

data, the water Bodies Stream/River/Tank/Reservoir lands were not in counted in

secondary data land use classification. So there is difference in primary and

secondary land use data. The village wise land use classification is very useful to

conduct CSR activities in the project area. Detailed field observations and

investigations were carried out and noted the land use features on the study

area. The village wise revenue data was verified with village revenue officers

(VROs).

Demography and Socio-Economics

Tapi district is located in the Southern part of Gujarat. On 27/09/2007, revenue

district of Surat was bifurcated into two new district viz. Surat district with its

headquarter at Surat and Tapi district with its headquarter at Vyara. The newly

constituted Tapi district consists of five taluka viz. Vyara, Songadh, Uchchhal,

Nizar and Valod. Vyara and Songadh in Tapi district are known for dense forests

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 26

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

with a major production of bamboos. Key tourist destinations are Fort of

Songadh, Gaumukh, Doswada Dam, Hindustan Bridge, Tapi River and Ukai Dam.

The demographic and socio- economic conditions prevailing in the the Proposed

Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90

MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh,

District Tapi, Gujarat.

Methodology Adopted for the Study

The methodology adopted for the study mainly includes primary survey, review of

published secondary data (District Census Statistical Handbooks- 2011, 2001 and

Primary Census Abstract of Census-2011, 2001) with respect to population,

population density, household size, sex ratio, social stratification, literacy rate

and occupational structure, available and development of physical infrastructure

like road transport facilities, drinking water supply, drainage facilities, electrical

facilities and social infrastructure like educational facilities, health facilities,

community development and employment, opportunities to local people in contractual works in the 10 km radius study area.

Review of Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile-2011

In the proposed land, earlier in year 1995 EC & NoC for Manufacturing of

newsprint (6250 MT/month) and printing and writing paper (4167 MT/month) was

obtained and site work initiated was stopped due to some unavoidable

circumstances. The proposed Zinc Smelter Complex will be established within

165.60 ha of industrial area, allotted by Gujarat Industrial Development

Corporation (GIDC) on 16th February, 1995 to Sterlite Communication at GIDC

Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat. Sterlite Communication is in the

possession of land and request has been submitted to Govt. of Gujarat for change of land entitlement for 165.60 ha of land to Hindustan Zinc Ltd.

The village wise demographic data of 91 rural villages, Songhad municipality are

falling within 10 km radius of the project area. As per the 2011 census rural

villages and urban area data is given in Annexure-VI. The salient features of the

demographic and socio-economic conditions are analyzed and described in the following sections.

Demography

Distribution of Population

As per 2011 census the study area consisted of 145425 persons inhabited in

study area. The distribution of population in the study area is shown in Table-5

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 27

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

TABLE-5

DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION

Particulars As Per 2011 Census

0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

No. of Households 3207 13860 14138 31205

Male Population 7667 32995 31877 72539

Female Population 7637 32837 32412 72886

Total Population 15304 65832 64289 145425

Male Population (0-6 years) 771 3833 3379 7983

Female Population (0-6 years) 795 3642 3266 7703

Total Population (0-6 years) 1566 7475 6645 15686

% of 0-6 years population 10.23 11.35 10.34 10.79

Average Household Size 4.77 4.75 4.55 4.66

% of males to the total population 50.10 50.12 49.58 49.88

% of females to the total population 49.90 49.88 50.42 50.12

Sex Ratio (no of females per 1000 males) 996 995 1017 1005

Child Sex Ratio (no of females per 1000 males (0-6 years)) 1031 950 967 965

Density 254 348 336 330

Source: Census of India 2011

Average Household Size

The study area has a household size of 4.66 as per 2011 census.

Population Density

The density of population reveals that the study area has an overall density of

330 persons per km2 (PP km2) as per 2011 census reports.

Sex Ratio

The configuration of male and female indicates that the males constitute to about

49.88% and females to 50.12% of the total population as per 2011 census

records. The study area on an average has 1005 females per 1000 males as per

2011 census. In comparison to the district sex ratio (Tapi district 1007) the study

area has recorded low sex ratio.

Social Structure

In the study area, as per 2011 census, 0.77% of the population belongs to

Scheduled Castes (SC) and 81.84% to Scheduled Tribes (ST). Overall the data of

social stratification reveals that the SC and ST % to population is more than 82%

as per 2011 census, The SC and ST community are marginalized and they are at

considered at low level of social strata and calls for a special attention in

corporate social responsibility Plan and corporate environment responsibility plan

for improving their socio-economic status apart from preservation and protection

of their art, culture and traditional rights of livelihood.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 28

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

The distribution of population by social structure is shown in Table-6

TABLE-6

DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION BY SOCIAL STRUCTURE

Particulars As Per 2011 Census

0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

Schedule caste population 9 797 307 1113

Schedule Tribes population 15038 43958 60016 119012

Schedule caste (SC) population % to the

total population 0.06 1.21 0.48 0.77

Schedule Tribes (ST) population % to the

total population 98.26 66.77 93.35 81.84

Total SC and ST population 15047 44755 60323 120125

% To the total SC and ST population 98.32 67.98 93.83 82.60

Total population 15304 65832 64289 145425

Source: Census of India 2011

Literacy Levels

The data of study area reveals that literacy rate of 70.19% as per 2011 census,

which is found to be more than the districts rate of literacy (Tapi district 68.3%). The distribution of literate and literacy rate in the study area is given in Table-7

TABLE-7

DISTRIBUTION OF LITERATE AND LITERACY RATES

Particulars As Per 2011 Census

0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

Male Population 7667 32995 31877 72539

Female Population 7637 32837 32412 72886

Total Population 15304 65832 64289 145425

Male Population (0-6 years) 771 3833 3379 7983

Female Population (0-6 years) 795 3642 3266 7703

Total Population (0-6 years) 1566 7475 6645 15686

Total Population above 7 years 13738 58357 57644 129739

Male literates (7+ years) 5286 23225 21389 49900

Female literates (7+ Years) 4250 18985 17931 41166

Total literates (7+ Years) 9536 42210 39320 91066

Male literacy rate (%) to the total literates 55.43 55.02 54.40 54.80

Female literacy rate (%) to the total literates 44.57 44.98 45.60 45.20

Average Male Literacy to the total population (%)

38.48 39.80 37.11 38.46

Average female Literacy to the total population (%)

30.94 32.53 31.11 31.73

Total Literacy rate (%) to the total population 69.41 72.33 68.21 70.19

Source: Census of India 2011

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 29

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

The percentage of male literates to the total literates of the study area works out

to be 54.80%. The percentage of female literates to the total literates, which is

an important indicator for social change, is observed to be 45.20% in the study

area as per 2011 census records.

Occupational Structure

The occupational structure of residents of work participation rate in the study

area is studied with reference to main workers, marginal workers and non-

workers. The main workers include 10 categories of workers defined by the

Census Department consisting of cultivators, agricultural laborers, those engaged

in live-stock, forestry, fishing, mining and quarrying; manufacturing, processing

and repairs in household industry; and other than household industry,

construction, trade and commerce, transport and communication and other

services.

The marginal workers are those workers engaged in some work for a period of

less than six months during the reference year prior to the census survey. The

non-workers include those engaged in unpaid household duties, students, retired

persons, dependents, beggars, vagrants etc.; institutional inmates or all other

non-workers who do not fall under the above categories.

As Per 2011 Census total work participation rate in the project study area is

55.30% and the non-workers constitute 44.70% of the total population

respectively. In comparison to the district work participation rate the study area

recorded more work participation rate (Tapi district 50.90%). The female non

workers to the total non-workers are 57.19% and male non- workers are

42.81%. The main workers to the total workers are 69.74% and the marginal

workers constitute to 30.26% to the total workers. The occupational structure of

the study area is shown in Table-8

TABLE-8

OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE

Particulars As Per 2011 Census

0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

Total Population 15304 65832 64289 145425

Total workers 9453 32938 38027 80418

Total main workers 5879 22874 27334 56087

Total Marginal workers 3574 10064 10693 24331

Total Non-workers 5851 32894 26262 65007

Non Workers Male 2815 13119 11896 27830

Non Workers Female 3036 19775 14366 37177

Work participation rate (%) 61.77 50.03 59.15 55.30

% of main workers to total workers 62.19 69.45 71.88 69.74

% of marginal workers to total workers 37.81 30.55 28.12 30.26

% of non-workers to total population 38.23 49.97 40.85 44.70

% of Male Non Workers to the total Non-workers 48.11 39.88 45.30 42.81

% of Female Non Workers to the total Non-workers 51.89 60.12 54.70 57.19

Source: Census of India 2011.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 30

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Economic Category Wise Distribution of Workers

The study area main workers classification is 39.69% of agricultural laborers,

31.27% of other workers, 29.96% of cultivators and 2.08% of household industry

workers. The agricultural laborers is predominant population and household other

are second dominant population. It was observed in primary survey 39.69% of agricultural laborer in main workers are mostly engaged in agricultural works.

The study area marginal workers classification is 60.53% of agricultural laborers,

21.93% of other workers, 15.12% of cultivators and 2.42% of household industry

workers. The predominant population is agricultural laborer and other workers are

second dominant population. It was observed in primary survey 60.53% of

agricultural laborer in marginal workers are mostly engaged in agricultural works.

The irrigated land admeasures to about 6676.14 ha in the study area as per 2011

land use census. The economic category wise distribution of workers of the study

area is shown in Table- 9

TABLE-9

ECONOMIC CATEGORY WISE DISTRIBUTION OF WORKERS

Particulars’ of Work Participation

As Per 2011 Census Percentage % as per 2011

Census 0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

Total workers 9453 32938 38027 80418 100

Main workers Total 5879 22874 27334 56087 100

Main workers Cultivators 2113 4919 9769 16801 29.96

Main workers Agricultural Laborers

2658 6825 11096 20579 36.69

Main workers Household Industry Workers

40 462 666 1168 2.08

Main workers Other Workers 1068 10668 5803 17539 31.27

Marginal workers Total 3574 10064 10693 24331 100

Marginal workers Cultivators 629 1240 1809 3678 15.12

Marginal workers Agricultural Laborers

2238 5517 6972 14727 60.53

Marginal workers Household Industry Workers

63 213 314 590 2.42

Marginal workers Other Workers 644 3094 1598 5336 21.93

Marginal workers Other Workers

3 - 6 months Total 2962 9227 9515 21704 100

Marginal workers Cultivators 3 - 6 months

603 1034 1719 3356 15.46

Marginal workers Agricultural

Laborers 3 - 6 months 1699 5216 6006 12921 59.53

Marginal workers Household Industry Workers 3 - 6 months

45 192 278 515 2.37

Marginal workers Other Workers 3 to 6 months

615 2785 1512 4912 22.63

Marginal workers Other Workers 0-3 months Total

612 837 1178 2627 100

Marginal workers Cultivators 0- 26 206 90 322 12.26

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 31

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Particulars’ of Work Participation

As Per 2011 Census Percentage %

as per 2011 Census

0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

3 months

Marginal workers Agricultural Laborers 0-3 months

539 301 966 1806 68.75

Marginal workers Household Industry Workers 0-3 months

18 21 36 75 2.85

Marginal workers Other Workers 0-3 months

29 309 86 424 16.14

Source: Census of India 2011.

Social and Physical Infrastructure Facilities

The infrastructure and amenities of Proposed Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35

MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and

35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat.” is

analyzed. In any empirical research study, it may not be possible to bring all the

needed information together with the help either primary or secondary

information itself. Hence, the research agency has inculcated both the primary as

well as the secondary sources for the preparation of final research report. But,

the study was predominated in terms of empirical in its nature and the primary

source has been largely materialized throughout the research and the secondary

information has also used according to the need and relevance of the study. The

tools which are used for the collection of primary information were self-structured

interview schedule, participatory observation methods, Focus Group Discussion

(FGD) and the field experiences of the investigators. In secondary data different

sources such as e-sources, RDPR reports, census data, district gazetteers and

other text books were used for preparation of the report. 91 villages and Songhad

municipality are considered for data analysis and assessment within the study

area. It is observed that infrastructure facilities are very poor in the project study

area, which consists of educational, health care, drinking water facilities,

communications, and drainage, etc.

Educational Facilities

The educational facilities are found to be poor in the Proposed Zinc Smelter

Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive

Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi,

Gujarat project study area.

CAG audit examined the extent to which central and state governments have

complied with the provisions of the act and utilized the allocated funds. The audit

was conducted in 28 states and 7 Union Territories (UTs) for the period between

April 2010 and March 2016. The key observations and recommendations of the

audit Report are as follows:

Financial management: Retention of huge balances by the state governments was

observed which indicates poor internal financial control;

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 32

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Compliance with the RTE Act, 2009: Certain areas of deviance from the provisions

of the RTE Act, 2009 were observed. These include: (i) non-maintenance of a

record of the number of children eligible for elementary education, (ii) children

above the age of 14 years being retained in elementary classes in violation of the

Act, (iii) schools being run without recognition, and (iv) inadequate pupil teacher

ratio due to poor mobilization of teachers and deployment of existing teachers for

non-educational purposes. The CAG recommended that state governments must

correctly identify the eligible children and enroll them. Further, the state

governments must re-evaluate the requirement of teachers and other

infrastructural requirements to bring them in line with the Act.

There are 132 Government primary schools, 02 Private Primary Schools, 07

Government secondary schools, 05 Private secondary schools, 03 Government

senior secondary schools, 03 private senior secondary schools and 01 private

medical college located in Tadkuva village at Vyra taluka are available.

Government, private middle schools, Government polytechnic colleges,

Government, private arts and science degree colleges, Government and private

engineering collages, Government medicine colleges, Government and private

vocational training schools/ ITI, Government and private schools for disabled are

nil in the study area. The available village wise educational facilities in the rural

study area are given in Table-10 and Annexure.VII

TABLE-10

EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IN THE STUDY AREA

Sr. No Name of the Institution 0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

1 Govt Primary Schools (Numbers) 18 49 70 137

2 Private Primary Schools (Numbers) 0 0 2 2

3 Govt Middle Schools (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

4 Private Middle Schools (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

5 Govt Secondary Schools (Numbers) 3 1 3 7

6 Private Secondary Schools (Numbers) 0 2 3 5

7 Govt Senior Secondary Schools (Numbers) 1 0 2 3

8 Private Senior Secondary Schools (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

9 Govt Arts and Science Degree College

(Numbers) 0 0 0 0

10 Private Arts and Science Degree College

(Numbers) 0 0 0 0

11 Govt Engineering College (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

12 Private Engineering College (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

13 Govt Medicine College (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

14 Private Medicine College (Numbers) 0 0 1 1

15 Govt Polytechnic (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

17 Govt Vocational Training School/ITI (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

18 Private Vocational Training School/ITI (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

19 Government School For Disabled (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

20 Private School For Disabled (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

Source: Census of India 2011

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 33

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Health Facilities in the rural study area

The national norm for population coverage per sub-center is 3000 for tribal areas

and 5,000 for plain areas. Similarly, it is recommended to have a Primary Health

Centre (PHCs) for population of 20,000 to 30,000 and CHC (community Health

Center) for population in the range 80,000 to 1, 20,000. The number of PHCs

served by a CHC is yet another indicator by which the physical accessibility can

be judged. As per national norms, 1 PHCs should be served by one CHC.

The types of health facilities available in the study area include, 03 primary health

centers, 32 primary health sub centers, 02 TB clinics, 03 hospital for allopathic,

02 mobile health clinics are available. The project core area Dosawada

population is 3971 consisting 3950 of schedule tribe population. The community

health centers, Maternity and child welfare centers, dispensaries, veterinary

hospitals, family welfare centers are nil, the health facilities are found to be poor

in the rural villages in the study area. The available village wise health facilities in

the study area are given in Table-11 and Annexure-VIII

TABLE- 11

HEALTH FACILITIES IN THE STUDY AREA

Sr. No Institution 0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

1 Community Health Centers (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

2 Primary Health Centers (Numbers) 0 1 2 3

3 Primary Health Sub Centers (Numbers) 3 10 19 32

4 Maternity And Child Welfare Centers

(Numbers) 0

0 0 0

5 TB Clinic (Numbers) 0 1 1 2

6 Hospital Allopathic (Numbers) 0 1 2 3

7 Dispensary (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

8 Veterinary Hospital (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

9 Mobile Health Clinic (Numbers) 0 1 1 2

10 Family Welfare Centre (Numbers) 0 0 0 0

Source: Primary Survey

Livestock

Livestock is a very common source of income found in project affected area. The

animals include buffalo, goat, bull, cow and poultry; these allied activities give

the villagers sources of income. It is necessary to promote livestock’s in the area

and related infrastructure should be provided to the villagers. One of the main

economic source also live stocks in project affected villages and surrounding

villages, out of 91 village’s veterinary hospitals are not available in the rural study

area. Livestock in the study area is given in figure-5.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 34

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

FIGURE: 5

LIVESTOCK IN THE STUDY AREA

Drinking Water facility in the rural villages of the study area

One of the most important factors responsible for the emergence of a settlement

is availability of water. Many water sources such as wells, hand pumps, tube well,

tank etc. are available in rural areas. In the villages under study, the main source

of water is tank, followed by tap. The water of the hand-pump is used for drinking

for animals, bathing and household purposes. There are fewer ponds in the area

and are mostly dry except for monsoon months. The water from the ponds is

generally not used by the villagers except for bathing animals.

It was reported that during the summer season, large number of wells become

dry and the major source of water in the villages during lean season are the hand

pumps and some deep borings. However, more than half the hand pumps in

these villages were not functional and required repair.

91 villages are covered in the total study area; the drinking water facilities are

found to be poor in the proposed plant study area. Tap water from treated source

are not available in all villages as per the secondary data census 2011, based on

the primary survey it was observed drinking water is supplying through overhead

tanks by Government. 45 villages are having untreated sources, 90 villages are

having un-covered well sources, all villages are having hand pump facilities, 52

villages are having Tube Wells/Borehole sources, 48 villages are having

River/Canal source, 05 villages are having spring sources, 11 villages are having

Tank/Pond/Lake sources, covered well sources and other sources for drinking

water are nil. The list of village wise available water sources in the study area is

given in Table-12, Annexure.IX and overhead drinking water source in Kikakue

village given in Figure.6.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 35

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

TABLE- 12

SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER FACILITY AVAILABLE IN NUMBER OF VILLAGES

IN THE E STUDY AREA

Sr. No

Source of Drinking Water source

(Availability of number of

villages)

0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

1 Tap Water-Treated 0 0 0 0

2 Tap Water Untreated 4 16 25 45

3 Covered Well 0 0 0 0

4 Uncovered Well 9 36 45 90

5 Hand Pump 9 36 46 91

6 Tube Wells/Borehole 7 22 23 52

7 Spring 0 2 3 5

8 River/Canal 3 20 25 48

9 Tank/Pond/Lake 2 5 4 11

10 Others 0 0 0 0

Source: Census of India 2011

FIGURE: 6

OVERHEAD DRINKING WATER SOURCE IN KIKAKUE VILLAGE

Communication and Transport Facilities

Transport is an important part of India's economy but it is poor in comparison

with international standards. Since the economic liberalization of the 1990s,

infrastructure development has progressed rapidly; today there is a variety of

modes of transport by land, water and air. However, India's relatively low GDP

per capita has meant that access to transport has not been uniform. Public

transport remains the primary mode of transport for most of the livelihood India.

Buses take up over 90% of public transport in Indian cities and serve as a cheap

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 36

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

and convenient mode of transport for all classes of society. Services are mostly

run by state government owned transport corporations. Taxis can either be hailed

or hired from taxi-stands. Indian Railways provides an important mode of

transport in India, transporting over 18 million passengers and more than 2

million tonnes of freight daily across one of the largest and busiest rail networks

in the world.

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation is known as GSRTC. It is a Govt. State

Transport Undertaking of Gujarat for passengers facilitating with Road Public

Transport City Services. GSRTC operates within the state of Gujarat, India and

neighboring states. It has a fleet of 8703 buses and it is the brainchild of Prime

Minister Narendra Modi. GSRTC has been incorporated since 1 May 1960 with 7

divisions, 76 depots and 7 divisional workshops, which has been expanding. The

public undertaking is covering 98% of the villages and 99% population of Gujarat

in addition to plying to major cities of the country.

In the study area 91 villages, Raniamba village from Songhad taluka is having

post office services, 26 villages are having sub post office services, 61 villages are

having land line facilities, 31 villages are having Public Call Office /Mobile (PCO),

88 villages are having mobile phone network courage, 79 villages are having

internet cafes, all villages are having Government bus service facilities, 18

villages are having van/taxi services, 04 villages are railway stations, 14 villages

are having tractor services in the rural study area. 02 village having private

courier facility. Private bus facilities services. The list of village wise

communication infrastructure details in study area is given in Table- 13 and

Annexure. X and Social Expert visit in Ukhalda village sub post office is given in

Figure-7.

TABLE- 13

COMMUNICATION INFRASTUCTURE IN THE STUDY AREA

Sr. No Communication and Infrastructure

(Availability in number of villages) 0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

1 Post Office 0 1 0 1

2 Sub Post Office 2 10 14 26

3 Post And Telegraph Office 0 0 0 0

4 Telephone (landlines) 6 22 33 61

5 Public Call Office /Mobile (PCO) 1 9 21 31

6 Mobile Phone Coverage 9 35 44 88

7 Internet Cafes / Common Service Centre (CSC) 8 30 41 79

8 Private Courier Facility 0 0 0 0

9 Public Bus Service 9 36 46 91

10 Private Bus Service 0 0 0 0

11 Railway Station 2 1 1 4

12 Van/Taxi 0 8 10 18

13 Tractors 2 2 10 14

Source: Primary Survey

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 37

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

FIGURE-7

SOCIAL EXPERT VISIT IN UKHALDA VILLAGE SUB POST OFFICE

Development of rural roads brings multiple socio-economic benefits to the rural

areas which form a strong base of the National economy and it is a powerful

instrument for the socio-economic transformation of the villages. Awareness of

these benefits and their evaluation plays an essential role for providing all

weather rural roads. The quickly visible of these benefits are increased mobility,

increased productivity, saving in cost of transportation of men and material and

speedier flow of commodities beside, changes in the life style. Rural roads provide

basic inputs for all-round socio-economic development of the rural areas.

Education Level: The connection of the villages to the road network results in

setting up more Schools- primary and middle level and increases the educational

standard of the inhabitants of rural community.

Health Care: Development of rural roads to connect the villages with the highway

and nearby towns provides facilities to establish more health centers and

dispensaries where the staff can function more effectively and attend to more

number of persons by increasing their area of operation.

Increase in Agriculture: The cultivators in the village will be able to produce more

agricultural product by way of generated incentives for marketing their produce at

low transportation cost and importing the fertilizer, manures and seeds at

cheaper rate due to; the reduced cost of transportation to the village. Thus, the

productivity of agriculture which is one of the most important sector of our

economy is increased. Proper road connection also reduces the time of

transporting the perishable products like milk, vegetables, poultry products, etc.

and ensures a remunerative price for such commodities throughout the year to

the producer and a regular supply to the consumers

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 38

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Industrial Benefit: The availability of road links provides opportunity to the

entrepreneurs for setting up industrial units particularly the agro-industries which

are based on the locally available raw materials. It reduces the cost of

transportation of raw materials from the outside and marketing of finished

products

Cultural Change: The development of roads breaks the cultural barriers among

the communities by bringing them together more frequently for interaction,

understanding and exchange of ideas, Thus the cultural reservations are broken,

and acculturation takes place.

The provision and construction of roads and road links brings multiple socio-

economic benefits to the rural areas and results in forming a strong backbone for

the agro-based economy. The study area main workers classification is 39.69% of

agricultural laborers, 31.27% of other workers, 29.96% of cultivators and 2.08%

of household industry workers. The agricultural laborers is predominant

population and household other are second dominant population. It was observed

in primary survey 39.69% of agricultural laborer in main workers are mostly

engaged in agricultural works. The rural study area Road connectivity is given in

Table no-14 and Annexure-XI

TABLE- 14

ROAD CONNECTVITY IN THE STUDY AREA

Sr.

No

Available Road Network Facilities in

the rural study area 0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

1 National Highway 0 0 1 1

2 State Highway 3 9 17 29

3 Major District Road 4 13 13 30

4 Other District Road 9 36 43 88

5 Black Topped (pucca) Road 9 36 45 90

6 Gravel (kuchha) Roads 9 35 46 90

7 Water Bounded Macadam 6 28 40 74

8 All Weather Road 9 32 42 83

9 Navigable Waterways 1 5 1 7

10 Foot path 9 36 46 91

Source: Primary Survey

It was observed in primary survey the study area out of 91 villages there is

Pankhri village from Vyra taluka is having national highway road connectivity, 29

villages are having state highway connectivity, 30 villages are having major

district road connectivity, 88 villages are connected with other district roads, 90

villages are having black topped pucca roads, 90 villages are having Gravel

kachha roads, 74 villages are having water bounded macadam’s, 83 villages are

all weather roads (Basic access is defined as one all-weather road access from

each village/ habitation to the nearby Market Centre or Rural Business Hub (RBH)

and essential social and economic services. A Core Network comprises of Through

Routes and Link Routes.) All villages are having foot path roads inside the villages

without proper drainage system.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 39

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Drainage System

Removing storm water and household wastewater (sometimes called "sullage") is

an important environmental health intervention for reducing disease. Poorly

drained storm water forms stagnant pools that provide breeding sites for disease

vectors. Because of this, some diseases are more common in the wet season than

the dry season. Household wastewater may also contain pathogens that can

pollute groundwater sources, increasing the risk of diseases such as lymphatic

filariasis. Poor drainage can lead to flooding, resulting in property loss, and people

may even be forced to move to escape floodwaters. Flooding may also damage

water supply infrastructure and contaminate domestic water sources.

Individual Health and hygiene is largely dependent on adequate availability of

drinking water and proper sanitation. There is, therefore, a direct relationship

between water, sanitation and health. Consumption of unsafe drinking water,

improper disposal of human excreta, improper environmental sanitation and lack

of personal and food hygiene have been major causes of many diseases in

developing countries. India is no exception to this. Prevailing High Infant Mortality

Rate is also largely attributed to poor sanitation. It was in this context that the

Central Rural Sanitation Programme (CRSP) was launched in 1986 primarily with

the objective of improving the quality of life of the rural people and also to provide

privacy and dignity to women.

As per primary survey 79 village are having open drainage facilities, 03 villages are

having pucca drainage with covered with tiles and slabs, 07 villages are having

open pucca drainage uncovered with tiles and slabs, 17 villages are covered open

kaccha drainage facilities, Vagda village from Songhad taluk drain water is

discharged directly into water bodies or to sewar, the village total population is

1632 and households are 353. Closed drainage facilities are nil in the study area.

The study area all villages are not covered in Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) as

per the Census 2011. The available Drainage facilities in the rural study area is

given in Table No-15 and annexure-XII

TABLE- 15

AVAILABLE DRAINAGE FACILITATES IN THE STUDY AREA

Sr.

No

Available Drainage Facilities in the

study area 0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

1 Closed Drainage 0 0 0 0

2 Open Drainage 9 35 35 79

3

Open Pucca Drainage Covered with Tiles

Slabs 0 1 2 3

4 Open Pucca Drainage Uncovered 0 4 3 7

5 Open Kuccha Drainage 9 33 33 75

6

Whether Drain water is discharged

directly into water bodies or to sewar 0 1 0 1

7

Is the Area Covered under Total

Sanitation Campaign (TSC)? 0 0 0 0

Source: Primary Survey

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 40

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Banking Service

ATMs (An automated teller machine): ATM Network in rural areas accounted for

only 10.1 percent of total ATMs in the country as on March 31, 2013. Banks

should enhance their ATM network in rural and un- banked areas to serve poor

villagers. While doing so, adequate care should be taken regarding safety/

security issues, which have come to the fore in recent times. The study area total

91 villages ATMs are not available. It was observed in primary survey people are

going Songhad or Vyra to collect cash from ATMs. 02 commercial banks, 01

Agricultural marketing society located in Bhimpura village, Songhad village, 06

agricultural credit societies are available in the study area. The available banking

facilities in the rural study area are given in TABLE-16 and Annexure- XIII

TABLE- 16

AVAILABLE BANKING FACILITATES IN THE STUDY AREA

Sr.

No

Available SGHs & Banking Facilities

in the study area 0-3 km 3-7 km 7-10 km 0-10 km

1 ATM 0 0 0 0

2 Commercial Bank 0 1 1 2

3 Cooperative Bank 0 0 0 0

4 Agricultural Credit Societies 2 2 2 6

5 Self - Help Group (SHG) 9 36 46 91

6 Agricultural Marketing Society 0 0 1 1

Source: Primary Survey

Electrification in Rural area

In the study area total 91 villages, all villages are having Power Supply for

domestic use, agriculture use, and commercial use. Electricity was supplied for

domestic, agricultural and public lighting purposes. The power supply in the study

area is considered be good because Power supply for all users is available for all

villages. People expressed their views in primary survey for agricultural uses they

are facing some problems; 24 hours of power is not available for agricultural.

The rural area village wise list of power supply details are given in Table-17 and

Annexure- XIV

TABLE- 17

AVAILABILITY OF POWER SUPPLY IN THE STUDY AREA

Sr.

No

Availability of Electricity (Number of

villages)

0-3

km 3-7 km

7-10

km

0-10

km

1 Power Supply For Domestic Use 9 36 46 91

2 Power Supply For Agriculture Use 9 36 46 91

3 Power Supply For Commercial Use 9 36 46 91

4 Power Supply For All Users 9 36 46 91

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 41

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Agriculture

Altogether 27148.34 ha cultivable land (irrigated, un-irrigated and Land Under

miscellaneous tree crops etc.) was observed in the study area. The irrigated land

admeasures to about 6676.14 ha in the study area which works out to be 15.15%

of total study area. The un-irrigated land admeasures about 20290.98 ha and

works out to about 46.05% of the total study area. Land under miscellaneous

tree crops area admeasures to about 181.22 ha and works out 0.41 % of the

total study area. The project study area major crop is paddy. Sourgram, Suger

cane are second commodities and third commodities are Ground nut and Piegeon

Pea in the study area. The village wise agricultural commodities first, second and

third is given in Table- 18

TABLE-18

VILLAGE WISE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES FIRST,

SECOND AND THIRD

Sr. No Village

Name/Urban Area Agricultural

Commodities (First)

Agricultural Commodities

(Second)

Agricultural Commodities (Third)

0-3 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

1 Nishana Paddy sugarcane ground nut

2 Achhalva Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

3 Sadadkuva Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

4 Pokhran Paddy sorghum ground nut

5 Kikakui Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

6 Mandal Paddy sorghum ground nut

7 Dosvada Sorghum paddy ground nut

8 Kumkuva Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

9 Rupvada Paddy sorghum ground nut

3-7 kms songadh taluka, tapi district, gujarat

10 Jhadpati sugarcane paddy ground nut

11 Galkhadi Paddy sorghum ground nut

12 Moti Khervan Paddy groundnut sorghum

13 Vagda Paddy sorghum ground nut

14 Dumda Paddy wheat sorghum

15 Amlipada Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

16 Kelai sugarcane paddy sorghum

17 Kavla Paddy sugarcane ground nut

18 Amli Paddy sugarcane sorghum

19 Champavadi Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

20 Chakalia Paddy sorghum ground nut

21 Khambhala Paddy sorghum sugarcane

22 Chapaldhara Paddy sorghum ground nut

23 Raniamba Paddy sorghum ground nut

24 Balamrai Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

25 Tokarva (Segupada) Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

26 Tokarva (Jamankuva) Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

27 Kakad Kuva Paddy sorghum ground nut

28 Kharsi Sorghum paddy ground nut

29 Devalpada Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

30 Kanala Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 42

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Sr. No Village

Name/Urban Area

Agricultural

Commodities (First)

Agricultural

Commodities (Second)

Agricultural

Commodities (Third)

31 Chorvad Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

32 Chikhli Khadka Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

33 Junvan Paddy sorghum ground nut

34 Galkuva Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

35 Bedpada Sorghum paddy soybean

36 Kanadevi Paddy sorghum soybean

37 Rampura Kanadevi Paddy sorghum soybean

38 Nana Bandharpada Paddy sorghum soybean

39 Jharali Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

40 Kukradungri Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

41 Kukadjhar Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

42 Vadpada P Tokarva Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

43 Ghodchit Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

44 Bandharpada Sorghum paddy soybean

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

45 Virpur Paddy pigeon pea green gram

7-10 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

46 Dhajamba sugarcane paddy ground nut

47 Veljhar Paddy sugarcane ground nut

48 Vajharda Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

49 Bedvan P Bhensrot Paddy sugarcane ground nut

50 Ukhalda sugarcane paddy ground nut

51 Pipalkuva Paddy sugarcane ground nut

52 Nani Khervan sugarcane paddy sorghum

53 Ghoda sugarcane paddy ground nut

54 Bhimpura Paddy groundnut sorghum

55 Gunsada Sorghum paddy ground nut

56 Bedi Paddy sugarcane ground nut

57 Agasvan Paddy sorghum wheat

58 Gaisavar Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

59 Chimkuva Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

60 Nani Bhurvan Paddy sorghum ground nut

61 Medhsingi Paddy sorghum ground nut

62 Khokhsa Paddy sorghum ground nut

63 Moti Bhurvan Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

64 Hiravadi Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

65 Amba Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

66 Gatadi Sorghum paddy lady's finger/okra

67 Tichakia Sorghum paddy sugarcane

68 Hanmantiya Sorghum paddy pigeon pea

69 Mahudi Paddy sorghum ground nut

70 Monghvan Paddy sorghum sugarcane

71 Maiyali Paddy sorghum ground nut

72 Sandhkuva Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

73 Tarsadi Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

74 Kakad Kuva P Umarda Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

75 Bedvan P Umarda Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

76 Vadpada P Umarda Paddy sorghum pigeon pea

77 Chakvan Paddy sorghum tur

78 Borkuva Paddy sorghum tur

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 43

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Sr. No Village

Name/Urban Area

Agricultural

Commodities (First)

Agricultural

Commodities (Second)

Agricultural

Commodities (Third)

79 Kalaghat Paddy sorghum tur

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

80 Katiskuva Najik pigeon pea sorghum paddy

81 Sarkuva Sorghum wheat ground nut

82 Katgadh Sorghum pigeon pea paddy

83 Bedkuva Najik Sorghum sugarcane paddy

84 Kanpura sugarcane sorghum paddy

85 Tadkuva Sorghum paddy pigeon pea

86 Chikhli pigeon pea sugarcane paddy

87 Vaghjhari sugarcane paddy ground nut

88 Chikhalda Paddy sorghum wheat

89 Saraiya Sorghum paddy ground nut

90 Pervad Cereals pigeon pea ground nut

Uchchhai taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

91 Pankhri Sorghum pigeon pea paddy

4.0 MAJOR FINDINGS AND INFERENCES

The present study gives sufficient space to include the respondents both from

men and women to equalize gender hierarchy with unbiased perception. Since,

most of the respondents were married the responses which are given by them are

mostly based on their observations and experiences it has been assumed that the

maturity level of the responses was of high standard. Although a marginal

proportion of the respondents were illiterate a major portion consisted of people

who attended at least the primary education, hence the respondents did not face

much difficulty in understanding and responding adequately to the questions.

Coming to the occupational status of the respondents, most of them were from

the category of Agricultural Laborers, casual laborer and this has made them to

feel job insecurity which effects on their livelihood. It was also found that, a huge

number of the respondents depend on both semi-skilled and unskilled occupations

which make their employability level low and results in gaining less income. The

selected area for research is a multiethnic area where people of different ethnic

groups and religious denominations were present with a majority of the people

belonged to schedule tribe religion with consist of Other Backward Classes (OBC)

as dominant groups and a visible proportion of the population belonged to the

general population and it was felt that, the welfare facilities need to be provided

for them under corporate social responsibility (CSR) and proposed Corporate

Environment responsibility fund (CER) according to the terms of references. In

the study area, as per 2011 census, 0.77% of the population belongs to

Scheduled Castes (SC) and 81.84% to Scheduled Tribes (ST). Overall the data of

social stratification reveals that the SC and ST % to population is more than 82%.

Though, the majority of people in study area predominantly speak in Gujarathi

and as their mother tongue. Many of younger generation understood Hindi

language, the family size is an important variable in planning the CSR/ proposed

CER activities in any area, and the average size of the family in the research area

was found as 4-5 members in a family and less than that. The families consisting

above 5 members were of a countable number and very rare. This finding

indicates that, the HZL has to plan the CSR/ proposed CER activities in the

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 44

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

research area very intensively. Selected research area is known for its prosperity

in terms of socioeconomic and natural resources. Hence, obviously the majority of

households belong to below poverty level families. As per the occupational status

is concerned, the more number of respondents belonged to the unskilled, semi-

skilled and agricultural casual laborers, factory workers category and their family

income was also revealed as meager and seldom. It was also noticed that most of

the household’s annual income is more than 30000 thousand. Besides the CSR/

proposed CER activities by the Company, The proposed Zinc Smelter Complex will

be established within 165.60 ha of industrial area, allotted by Gujarat Industrial

Development Corporation (GIDC) on 16th February, 1995 to Sterlite

Communication at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat. Sterlite

Communication is in the possession of land and request has been submitted to

Govt. of Gujarat for change of land entitlement for 165.60 ha of land to

Hindustan Zinc Ltd.

In the proposed land, earlier in year 1995 EC & NoC for Manufacturing of

newsprint (6250 MT/month) and printing and writing paper (4167 MT/month) was

obtained and site work initiated was stopped due to some unavoidable

circumstances.

The proposed zinc smelter will be installed with hydro-metallurgical smelting

process is a Roast, Leach and Electro-winning process along with Fumer plant and

coal based CPP. The memorandum of understanding (MoU) was made between

Government of Gujarat and Mr. Hindustan Zinc Limited, the company directly or

through its subsidiary is inter alia interested in setting up a new Zinc Smelter

Plant at Dosawada, Tapi district, Gujarat. The company has planned the

investment of Rs. 10, 000 crores for the Zinc Smelter Plant in phased manner.

The investment in the new Zinc Smelter Plant project will accelerate the economic

and industrial development of the state and generating direct and indirect

employment to the tune of 5000 people. The project will help in setting up any

ancillary facilities in and around it which will provide the spin of benefits to the

economy and will help livelihood around 5000 people. It understood that

proposed Zinc Smelter Plant shall also generate various opportunities for direct

indirect employment and business in the area which shall positively impact the

income generation activities for local people.

The data of study area reveals that literacy rate of 70.19% as per 2011 census,

which is found to be more than the districts rate of literacy (Tapi district 68.3%).

It was observed in the primary survey month of January 2021 many primary

schools were closed for the reason of Covid 19 in the rural study area.

Health and hygiene is an important area where lot of CSR activities can be carried

out. It was found in the present study an overwhelming majority of the

population in the study area was much aware about the health and hygiene and

built toilets in their houses and very negligible percent of the populations yet to

build the toilets in their houses. In the study area all villages are not covered in

Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) as per 2011 census. 03 primary health centers,

32 primary health sub centers, 02 TB clinics, hospital for allopathic, 02 mobile

health clinics are available. The project core area Dosawada population is 3971

consisting 3950 of Schedule Tribe population. There are no community health

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 45

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

centers, Maternity and child welfare centers, dispensaries, veterinary hospitals,

family welfare centers. The health facilities are found to be poor in the rural

villages in the study area. One of the main economic source is the livestocks in

the surrounding villages, out of 91 villages veterinary hospitals are not available

in the rural study area. Even after introducing many provisions by the

government related to health in different stages such as PHCs, CHCs and district

hospitals it is quite interested to know that a sizeable respondent still depended

on traditional health practices hence it is advisable that through the CSR activities

a modernized health amenity can be made available to the vast Population.

Primary Health Care services has always remained a challenge in the rural areas.

As a result, cases of poor health of women, malnourishment among children and

death from preventable diseases is always high. The need of the hour is thus a

two-pronged approach – first to bring quality health care services to doorsteps of

the needy and second to promote healthcare awareness among communities.

HZL currently have 4 MHVs covering 110+ villages at 4 of its locations in

Rajasthan & Uttrakhand and same will be carried out in the proposed Zinc

Smelter Plant project. Concern of the population relating to the health condition

of the livestock, hence the need of veterinary services so in the study it has been

revealed that a vast number of population is having the accessibility of veterinary

services but it is quite interesting to know that the equivalent size of the

respondents did not take the services of the veterinary hospital. At this juncture

CSR activity can also be enlarged for the vast population in protecting their

livestocks to improve their livelihood.

91 villages are covered in the total study area; the drinking water facilities are

found to be poor in the proposed plant study area. Tap water from treated source

are not available in all villages as per the secondary data census 2011, based on

the primary survey it was observed drinking water is supplying through overhead

tanks by Government of Gujarat.

Raniamba village from Songhad taluka is having post office services, 26 villages

are having sub post office services,

Pankhri village from Vyra taluka is having national highway road connectivity, 29

villages are having state highway connectivity, 30 villages are having major

district road connectivity, participating with all the stakeholders to achieve HZL

target of reducing road death rate and road accidents upto 50% by 2020 as the

target set by UN, and create a safe and eco-friendly road culture. It was found in

the study that, only about one third of the population are having good

connectivity with good road facility and about half of the population in the study

area are having Kuccha road facility which can be altered or repaired by the

Project Proponent under CSR/ proposed CER activities. It was also found in the

study that, some of the surrounding villages are not even connected with either

Kaccha or Puckka road where the Project Proponent can do many more things.

The research agency found that there were some households in the study area

who are still depend on kerosene lamps for the light which is neither eco-friendly

nor good for the health. Hence, the Project Proponent can provide suitable

support through CSR/ proposed CER activities.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 46

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Majority of the households come under middle income category for them the

meeting the expenses of their children’s education is one of the heaviest burdens.

The study also reveals that the respondents are expecting scholarships for higher

education. Hence, awareness generation and linkages between rural masses and

agencies who are providing different scholarship should be increased through

CSR/ proposed CER activities by HZL Khushi Auganwadi program, Nandghar,

Shiksha Sambal project, Samadhan, Unchi Udaan project, Mindspark Learning

Lab and Scholarship Support for higher educations.

The holistic development of the children depends on creative and contended

childhood. The study revealed that a meager percentage of children do not

participate in sports and cultural activities. However, playing games, involvement

in sports and cultural activities is an important part in growth and development

and a vital activity in shaping child personality. The Project Proponent can

actively involve in promoting inclusive and other sports activities.

The component of schooling plays a vital role in building the personality of the

children towards constructing a prosperous nation. Therefore, providing good

amenities in the school is very important. As researched in the study area the

respondents were quite happy with all the amenities like, school building,

separate toilet facility, drinking water, library and computer lab facility,

playground and furniture equipment and teaching aids. However, it is interesting

to know that safety measures at schools are not up to the satisfaction of the

respondents. Therefore, a special interest can be showed on safety measures

along with improving other amenities in local schools through the CSR/ proposed

CER activities.

Providing basic amenities to the citizens is the duty of the society and also

supplying sufficient nutritious to the children and pregnant women is

recommended to extend and enlarge to the maximum number of population. In

the research it is identified that a vast number of respondents were not receiving

supplementary nutrition from the Anganwadi centers. Hence it is suggestible to

make separate study to understand the reasons behind not receiving the

nutritious food from the stake holders and based on outcomes separate measures

can be taken to fulfill the needs.

After making primary health as a major element in the Sustainable Development

Goals (SDGs) the Monitoring body of UNO has advised to every nation to take

amicable health measure in enriching the slogan, health for all under this slogan

respective states have taken measures to reach the general population. Through

the study it is found that some of the respondents does have accessibility to

health practitioners, however a notable issue is, that the vast number of villagers

in the communities still does not have the accessibility to the health institutions

due to various other issues. Hence there is a huge scope for CSR/ proposed CER

activities to monitor the health practices with collaboration of concerned

authorities.

Since most of the respondents have opined that conducting and organizing health

camps are beneficial to the people in the vicinity. It is suggestible to extend and

cover further activities in addition to existing events in the health intervention.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 47

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Extending the needed services to the community, depends on the infrastructure

and ecosystem created. In the present study it is found that majority of the

respondents were unsatisfied. The concerns/issues raised were; infrastructure of

the primary health centers, ambulance services, hygiene in and around the

hospitals, availability of beds, modern treatment equipment’s and specialized

health practitioners and dissatisfaction with the treatment processes. The

respondents were not satisfied with health amenities, thus, there is a scope for

improving better than the present.

The study found that although majority of the households have immunized their

children a sizeable percentage refrains from immunization. To have a healthy

future of the nation immunization of each child is necessary. Therefore, due steps

need to be taken in consideration while preparing CSR/ proposed CER activities.

The research also reveals that a vast portion of women from the sample size did

not receive prenatal care prior to the child birth hence priority should be given to

prenatal care to the woman.

Though the majority of respondents are well aware on the issue of family

planning there is a scope to done in this aspect for the society through awareness

campaigns. This initiative will definitely be of massive help to the families.

Water as a source for our routine activities in the research it is found that

majority of the population were depending on open wells as source for irrigation,

improving the condition of water level is in priority and very marginal portion of

the research were utilizing other sources of irrigation such as tube well, monsoon,

and river or lake or pond. Hence through the CSR activities separate monitoring

methods can be implemented in improving the quality of water for the irrigational

purposes. The study found that for agricultural uses formers are facing some

problems, 24 hours of power is not available for agriculture. Altogether 27148.34

ha cultivable land (irrigated, un-irrigated and Land Under miscellaneous tree

crops etc.) was observed in the study area. The irrigated land admeasures to

about 6676.14 ha in the study area which works out to be 15.15% of total study

area. The un-irrigated land admeasures about 20290.98 ha and works out to

about 46.05% of the total study area. Land under miscellaneous tree crops area

admeasures to about 181.22 ha and works out 0.41 % of the total study area.

The project study area major crop is paddy. Sourgram, Sugarcane are second

commodities and third commodities are Ground nut and Piegeon Pea in the study

area.

As per the study is concerned the majority of the women in the household are

doing household chores and during observation many of the women expressed

their desire to involve themselves in some income generating activities whereas a

few women expressed that they would like to spend their time in some activities

which would help others as well as give recreation and self-satisfaction to them.

Such women generally seek guidance from others to fulfill their desires but they

do not have any such guide. Hence the company can utilize this opportunity to

involve them in income generation and social service. The flagship project is

geared towards mobilizing rural women into self-help groups (SHGs) and

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 48

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

developing their capacities around leadership, skill development, savings and

entrepreneurship. Under this project, there are 2200+ SHGs, 194 Village

Organizations with a membership of about 27000 with total savings of Rs 11.25

Crore and cumulative loans of Rs 37.09 Crore including credit of Rs 6.44 Crore

leveraged from banks. 23482 women availed loans from SHGs for various

purposes like livelihood activities, education, debt redemption and house hold

consumption. 700+ women have started or expanded their micro-enterprises. To

provide sustainable livelihood opportunities to these SHG women- Spice, pulses &

pickle based micro-enterprise units have been established in Chanderiya, Agucha,

and Kayad location engaging hundreds of women. Leadership skills of more than

500 women are being developed through various trainings & capacity building

programs, these women are now working as community cadres.

As the data reveals that many of the respondents were expecting financial

assistance for income generation activities, it may not be possible for the Project

Proponent to monitor the financial assistance extended to the individuals hence it

is suggestible to the Project Proponent to collaborate with the SHGs and other

local associations to extend financial assistance in income generation activities.

The study reveals that many of the respondents were in need of skill based

trainings as most of the population has transitioned from their earlier occupations

to other occupations. It was also observed that a very negligible percent of the

sample has received vocational training. It is recommendable to the CSR wing for

taking up special skill based trainings to the project area population as part of

income generation activities. Linkage with Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana

(PMKVY) is the flagship scheme of the Ministry of Skill Development &

Entrepreneurship (MSDE). The objective of this Skill Certification Scheme is to

enable a large number of Indian youth to take up industry-relevant skill training

that will help them in securing a better livelihood. Individuals with prior learning

experience or skills will also be assessed and certified under Recognition of Prior

Learning (RPL). HZL has partnered with various organizations having expertise in

developing skills over the years. The same will be carried out in the proposed Zinc

Smelter Plant project.

Though the Project Proponent do not have any direct role in providing assistance

with the government schemes, The Company can, through its CSR wing help

the beneficiaries to get accessibility towards what they are eligible for; like widow

pensions, old age pensions and disability pensions. Project Proponent should take

action in extending to maximum number of the respondents and to increase the

size able number of beneficiaries.

The research agency made an attempt to understand the threats those were

perceived by the respondents in anticipation of loss of their land and the question

posed, revealed that majority of the respondents felt pollution would lead to face

the problem of health, illness and finally it would lead to marginalization and

social disintegration of the people.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 49

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

5.0 SUGGESIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HZL TO INTRODUCE CSR/

PROPOSED CER ACTIVITIES

Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) provides that a company having

net worth of rupees five hundred crores of more or turnover of rupees one

thousand crores or more or a net profit of rupees five crores or more must

constitute a corporate social responsibility committee (“CSR Committee”)

consisting of three or more directors, one out of whom must be an independent

director. The CSR Rules have been notified on 27 February 2014 and will come

into force on 1 April 2014. The CSR Committee is required to formulate a

corporate social responsibility policy (“CSR Policy”). HZL CSR policy is given in

annexure-XV.

Additionally, it is required that the CSR Policy adopted by the company must

specify that, any surplus arising out of CSR Activities will be re-directed towards

CSR Activities and not the business of the company. Further, the board of

directors are required to submit a report under Section 134 (3) of the Act, and the

relevant portions of the CSR Policy must be disclosed in the said report, also, the

relevant portions of the CSR Policy adopted by the Company must be disclosed on

the company’s website.

A significant addition to implementation partners are companies incorporated

under Section 8 (erstwhile Section 25) of the Act.

CSR Activities can now be implemented through the company’s own established:

● registered trust

● registered society

● Company or its subsidiary or holding or associate company under Section 8.

If such a trust, society or company is not established by the company, then it

must have an established track record of three years in undertaking similar

projects or programs.

Here is a description of what counts and what doesn’t, as per the rules:

Activities included in CSR expenditure: Expenditure on programs related to CSR Activities approved by the board of

directors, and on the recommendation of the CSR Committee (must be cited

in the CSR Policy)

Expenditure on building capacity of CSR team (up to 5 percent of CSR

expenditure), through institutions with an established track record of at least

three years

Contribution to corpus.

Activities excluded from CSR Expenditure:

Political contribution

Activities that are solely for benefit of employees and their families

Activities that are in pursuance of business-as-usual / activities undertaken in

pursuance of normal course of business of a company.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 50

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Corporate Environment Responsibility (CER)

Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with Corporate Social

Responsibility (CSR) and Schedule-VII of the Act lists out the activities which, be

included by companies in their CSR Policies. The concept of CSR as provided for

in the Companies Act, 2013 and covered under the Companies (Corporate Social

Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 comes into effect only in case of companies

having operating projects and making net profit as also subject to other

stipulations contained in the aforesaid Act and Rules. The environment clearance

given to a project may involve a situation where the concerned company is yet to

make any net profit and\or is not covered under the purview of the aforesaid Act

and Rules. In such cases, the provisions of aforesaid act and Rules will not apply.

In the past, it has been observed that different expert appraisal

committee’s/state expert appraisal committees (EACs/SEACs) have been

Prescribing different formulation of the Corporate Environment Responsibility

(CER) and no common principles are followed. Several suggestions have also

been received in this regard which inter-alia states that Greenfield projects and

Brownfield projects should be treated differently; no CER should be prescribed

whereas there is no increase in air pollution load, R&R, etc., besides streamlining

percentage of CER.

The Ministry has carried out a detailed stakeholder consultation which, inter-alia

included meeting with Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Ministry of Power,

Chairmen EACs, FICCI, ASSOCHAM, Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry

amongst others.

The cost of CER is to be in addition to the cost envisaged for the implementation

of the EIA/EMP which includes the measures for the pollution control,

environmental protection and conservation, R&R, wildlife and forest

conservation/protection measures including the NPV and compensatory

afforestation, required, if any, and any other activities, to be derived as part of

the EIA process.

The cost of CER is to be in addition to the cost envisaged for the implementation

of the EIA/EMP which includes the measures for the pollution control,

environmental protection and conservation, R&R, wildlife and forest

conservation/protection measures including the net project value (NPV) and

compensatory afforestation, required, if any, and any other activities, to be

derived as part of the EIA process. The fund allocation for the CER shall be

deliberated EAC or SEAC or DEAC, as the case may be, with a due diligence

subject to maximum percentage as prescribed below for different cases: Capital

Investment / Additional Capital Investment / (in Rs) project wise slabs

percentages were given in Table-19.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 51

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

TABLE -19

CAPITAL INVESTMENT / ADDITIONAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT / (IN RS)

PROJECT WISE SLABS PERCENTAGES

Sr. No Capital Investment / Additional

Capital Investment / (in Rs)

Greenfield

Project - % of

Capital

Investment

Brownfield

Project - % of

Additional

Capital

Investment

1 < 100 crores 2.00% 1.00%

2 > 100 crores to < 500 crores 1.50% 0.75%

3 > 500 crores to < 1000 crores 1.00% 0.50%

4 > From 1000 crores to < 10000 crores 0.50% 0.25%

5 > 10000 crores 0.25% 0.125%

The activities proposed under CER shall be worked out based on the issues raised

during the public hearing, social need assessment, R&R plan, EMP, etc. The

proposed activities shall be restricted to the affected area around the project.

Some of the activities which can be carried out in CER, are infrastructure creation

for drinking water supply, sanitation, health, education, skill development, roads,

cross drains, electrification including solar power, solid waste management

facilities, scientific support and awareness to local farmers to increase yield of

crop and fodder, rain water harvesting, soil moisture conservation works, avenue

plantation, plantation in community areas, etc.

As per the office memorandum about Corporate Environment Responsibility (CER)

issued by Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change on dated 1st May,

2018, for Greenfield projects of the total cost (Rs.10, 000 crores on phased

manner) of the project to be earmarked towards the corporate environment

responsibility (CER) based on local needs. The first phase of the project cost is

Rs. 5000 crores. The ToR was issued on 22nd December 2020 and as per MOEF &

CC EAC committee recommended in minutes through standard ToR to allocate

2.5% budget on total project cost. As per the MoEF & CC OM dated 20th

September 2020 the CER budget will be allocated based on the Public hearing

needs. The project proponent will reserve suitable amount based on the SIA

report recommendations and public hearing needs. The proposed CER budget will

be prepared after public hearing and incorporated in final report. The proposed

CER budget for greenfield project based on the project cost is given in Table-20.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 52

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

TABLE -20

THE PROPOSED CER BUDGET FOR GREENFIELD PROJECT

BASED ON THE PROJECT COST

Sr. No Capital Investment /

Additional Capital

Investment / (in Rs)

Greenfield

Project - %

of Capital

Investment

Detailed break up

for Rs. 5000 crores

Budget

Amount in

Lakhs

1 < 100 crores 2.00% Rs. 100 Crores @2%

2 > 100 crores to < 500

crores 1.50%

Rs. 400

[email protected]%

3 > 500 crores to < 1000

crores 1.00% Rs. 500 Crores@1%

4 > From 1000 crores to <

10000 crores 0.50%

Rs. 4500

[email protected]%

Grand Total Rs 5000 Crores

The proposed CER activities budget sector wise from 2021-22 to 2025-26 is given in

Table-21.

TABLE-21

PROPOSED CORPORATE ENVIRONMENT RESPONSIBILITY

BUDGET FOR FIVE YEARS

Sr. No. Main Area Proposed Budget

(Rs. in Lakhs)

1 Tribal Welfare 20

2 Health and Hygiene 15

3 Education 15

4 Skill Development & Self Employment 12

5 Drinking Water 12

6 Infrastructure 19

7 Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 10

8 Environment Protection and Others 10

9 Women Welfare 12

Total 125

The proposed CER activities budget village wise/unit wise from 2021-22 to 2023-24 is

given in Table-22.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 53

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

TABLE-22

VILLAGE WISE/UNIT WISE PROPOSED CSR ACTIVITIES

2021-22 to 2023-24

Sector Activities/ Unit wise/ Village wise Target time Budget in Rupees

Tribal Welfare

Health and Hygiene

EDUCATION

Skill Development &

Self Employment

DRINKING WATER

INFRASTUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 54

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Sector Activities/ Unit wise/ Village wise Target time Budget in Rupees

Agriculture and Animal

Husbandry

Environment Protection and

Others

Women Welfare

Grand Total as per 2.5% of Project cost Budget

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 55

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

ANNEXURE -I

HOUSEHOLD SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Household Survey Questionnaire SOP No. 09/28

Issue No.7.0 Page _ of _

Questionnaire No._______________________ Household Survey Questionnaire Date: __________________________

The data should be filled by interviewing the head of the family or an adult family member who can provide factual information on the family. The

questionnaire to be applied to the families who are proposed to be involuntary project affected

1. Identification

Name of the Habitation Name of the Village

Name of the Panchayat Name of the Hamlet

Name of the Mandal Name of the District

Household Head

Name & Ph.No.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 56

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

2. Household Details

S.No. Name Age Sex Education Main

Occup.

Sub

Occup.

Relationship

with HH

Vulnerability Are u a

title

holder

School

Dropouts

Marital

Status

Remarks

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 57

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Column-1 Mention Age in number

Column-2 1- Male ; 2 Female

Column- 3 1 – Illiterate; 2 – Informal education; 3 – Class1–4; 4 – Class5–7; 5 – Class8–9; 6 – Class10; 7 – Class11-12; 8 – Graduate; 9-Post Graduate;

10 – Professional; 999 – not applicable [not of school going age]

Column- 4 & 5 1 – Housewife; 2 – Retired/Old age; 3 – Farmer;/Tiller; 4 – Agriculture labour; 5 – Skilled labour /e.g. Carpenter, Plumber, Driver, Mason,

etc; 6 – Unskilled labour/e.g. Construction labourer, Loader, House help/ House maid, Caretaker; Watchman, etc; 7 – Traditional Artisan;

8 – Services e.g. Barber; Milkman, Dhobi; Cobbler; etc; 9 – Petty shop; 10 – Vendor; 11 – Business;(e.g., Shop–owner); 12 – Collection of

NTFP and MFP; 13 – Government service; 14 – Private service; 15 – Student; 16 - Others__________________ ; 999 – Not Applicable;

Column-6 1 – Head; 2 – Spouse of head; 3 – Mother; 4 – Father; 5 – Son; 6 – Daughter; 7 – Daughter-in-law;8 – Son-in-law; 9 – Grand son; 10 –

Grand daughter; 11 – Grand mother; 12 – Grand father; 13 – Brother; 14 – Sister; 15 – Sister in law; 16 – Brother in law; 17 – Relatives;

18 – Other specify:____________

Column-7 1. Disabled, 2. Destitute, 3. Orphan, 4. Widow, 5. Unmarried girl, 6. Abandoned women, 7. Person above fifty years of age, 8. Person who

cannot immediately be provided with alternative livelihood, 9. Persons who are not otherwise covered as part of a family

Column-8 1- Yes/ 2- No

Column-9 1. Primary, 2. Secondary, 3. Higher Secondary.

Column-10 1. Married, 2. Unmarried, 3. Widow / Widower, 4. Separated / Divorced, 5. Single, 6. Destitute, 7. Children / Not Applicable.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 58

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

3. Type of Family: 1. Regular/Normal 2. Joint 3. Nuclear 4.

Extended

4. Religion & Caste :

S.No. Description Response

a Religion 1. Hindu

2. Muslim

3. Christian

4. Others ___________________

b Caste 1. General

2. BC

3. MBC

4. SC

5. ST

c Caste Name

Name of

the Tribe

5. Family Card Details

Description Response

Do you have Family Card ? 1. YES 2. No

If Yes Which type? 1. APL 2.

BPL

Family Card Color

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 59

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

6. Housing Details:

Description Choice Response

a) Ownership of house If 1,

GOTO Q No. b; If 2, GOTO

Q No. c If 3, GOTO Q No.d

1.Own 2. Rented 3. Others

b) If ‘Own’, then is it given by

Government?

1.Yes 2.No

c) If ‘Rented’, what is the rent? Rs._______________

d) Type of Structure 1.Hut 2. IAY

3.Asbestos/Tiled Roof

4.Concrete Roof

e) Do you have electricity

connection? 1.Yes 2. No

(Single Phase/ 3 Phase)

f) What is your source for

drinking water? Water tap in the household

1.Premises 2.Public stand post

3.Hand pump 4.Open well

5.Pond 6. River

7.Any other_________________

g) What is your source of water

for other household purposes?

Water tap in the household

1.Premises 2.Public stand post

3.Hand pump 4.Open well

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 60

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Description Choice Response

5.Pond 6. River

7.Any other_________________

h) What is your source of water

for cattle or other animals?

Water tap in the household

1.Premises 2.Public stand post

3.Hand pump 4.Open well

5.Pond 6. River

7.Any other_

________________

i) Do you have a latrine in your house?

1.Yes 2. No

3.Using community toilet

4.Outside (open place)

j) Which type of toilet you are having?

1.Septic tank

2.Pit latrine

3. Pour flush

k) Do you and your family

members use it?

1. Yes (All of us always regularly)

2. Yes (Some of us, but irregular)

3. No

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 61

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Description Choice Response

l) if answer is 2 or 3, for k. then where do you defecate?

1. Agricultural fields

2. Road side

3. Next to house

4. Open fields.

5. Other places

m) Do you wash your hands with soap after defection?

1. Yes (All of us always regularly)

2. Yes (Some of us, but irregular)

3. No.

7. Where do you usually go for treatment when sick? (Tick as appropriate)

1. Clinic in village 2. Clinic in town 3. General Hospital

4. The chemist 5. A traditional Healer 6. No treatment

7. Other (Please specify)___________

8. What fuel does your household use?

S.No. Fuel used 1- Yes

2- No

S.No. Fuel Used 1- Yes

2- No

1. Fire wood 4. Coal

2. Natural

(Gobar)gas

5. LPG

3. Electric Stove 6. Others

9. Household Assets:

S.

No.

Asset 1.Yes 2.No S. No. Asset 1.Yes 2.No

1 Cycle 10 CD/DVD Player

2 Two Wheeler 11 Fan

3 Three Wheeler 12 Refrigerator

4 Four Wheeler 13 Grinder

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 62

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

5 Tractor 14 Land Phone

6 Tiller 15 Cell Phone

7 Radio 16 LPG Connection

8 Television 17 Cart

9 Cable/Dish 18 Others (Specify)

10. Live stock

S.No. Livestock Number Total Value Purpose of Keeping Income

derived

1 He Buffalo

2 She buffalo

3 Cow

4 Bullock

5 Goat

6 Sheep

7 Pigs

8 Poultry

9 Donkey

10 Others (Specify)

Purpose : 1- For own work; 2- For business/ renting out; 3- For Selling; 4- For food/milk; 5-

Other(Specify

11. Land

S.No. Description Options Survey

numbers Remarks

1 Do you have own land? 1.Yes ; 2. No

2 Residential (in sq. ft.)

3 Commercial (in sq. ft.)

4 Agricultural Dry land (in

Acres)

5 Agricultural Wet land (in

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 63

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

S.No. Description Options Survey

numbers Remarks

Acres)

6 Farm / Garden land (in

Acres)

7 Grazing land (in Acres)

8 Have you got any land under

the Govt 2 Acres scheme?

1.Yes ; 2. No

9 If Yes to 8, then what is the

extent?

10 ONLY FOR ST CATEGORY: Do you have any rights on forest land?

11 If Yes to 10, then what is the extent of land?

12 Do you have these rights from before 13 Dec 2005?

1.Yes ; 2. No

12. How long have you been in this village (Tick one)

1. Less than one year 2. Less than 3 years 3. More than 3 years 4. More than 5

years

5. More than 10 years

(If option 1 or 2)

Which is your original place? ____________________Gram

Panchayath__________________________

Taluk _________________________District _________________________________.

Are you shifted your family to this place temporarily / permanently ?

If temporarily, are you interested to go back to your original place? (1. Yes/ 2. No.) If yes.

When? ________________________________.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 64

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

13. Migration Details

1. Which is the place of your Economic pursuit (working)? ____________________

2. Does your family/any family member migrate? 1- Yes/ 2- No

3. If "Yes", whether migration is seasonal or regular? 1- Seasonal 2- Regular (if

seasonal got to Q.No.6)

4. If Regular, to which place: ____________ Gram Panchayat ____________

Taluk __________________________ District ___________________

46. What are the activities/works taken up at the place of migration?

1. _________________________________ (primary)

2. ___________________________________ (Secondary)

3. Total Earning __________________________________

47. If seasonal migration, what are the activities you take up?

Month Activity /work No. of Days Wage per day Place

14. Expenditure

S.No. Particular Unit Amount Spent Total /not be

filled in/

1 Food

2 Fuel and electricity

3 Education

4 Tobacco, alcohol, gambling

5 Entertainment

6 Cosmetics, Toiletries, etc.

7 Clothing

8 Medical : Medicines/ Doctor

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 65

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

S.No. Particular Unit Amount Spent Total /not be

filled in/

9 Transport

10 Festivals, religious ceremonies

11 House maintenance

12 Interest on loans, debts, etc.

13 Others (Specify)

Unit: 1 – Monthly; 2 – Quarterly; 3 – Half yearly; 4 – Annual

15. Income (of all Family members) :-

S.No. Sources of income Unit Income (Rs.) Total (Not to

be filled in)

1 Agricultural Income

2 Income from Share cropping?

How much is generally the share?

3 Daily wage rate?

Actual wage earning

4 Salary; Wage work of all family

members ( including services, crafts,

etc.)

5 Through Livestock

6 Petty Shop (Small Business) if any

7 Remittance from wards/ relatives

8 Govt. assistance (OAP, Disability,

Vulnerable Assistance, etc.)

9 Others ( Specify)

Unit: 1 – Monthly; 2 – Quarterly; 3 – Half yearly; 4 – Annual

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 66

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

16. Loans

1 Do you or your family member have

an account in any bank? 1-Yes ; 2- No

2 Have you taken any loan in last one

year ? 1-Yes ; 2- No

3 . If “Yes” give details

From

Whom

Last one year

No.

of

Times

Purpose Loan

amount

Interest

rate

Mode of

repayment

Any

repayment

is in Rs.

How

did you

manage

to get

loan

Current

Outstanding

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

Column 3: 1 – Construction of house; 2 – Purchase of land; 3 – Purchase of household assets; 4 –

Purchase of food grains; 5 – Marriage of daughter/ son/brother;/sister; 6 – Medical treatment; 7 –

Repayment of old loan; 8 – Death Ceremony; 9 – Other social ceremony; 10 – Education;; 11 –

Celebration of festivals; 12 – Others __________

Column 6: 1– Installment; 2 – Total Repayment; 3 – Any other specify_______ Column 8: 1 –

Mortgage immovable property; 2 – Mortgage assets; 3 – Promissory note; 4 – Through a guarantor; 5 –

SHG membership; 6 – Any other specify_____________

17. Is your village covered by CSR activities?

1. Yes 2. No 3. No Idea

18. If yes, which company is doing it?

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 67

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

19. Is your household benefited from the existing CSR activities?

1. Yes 2. No

20. If yes, which benefits have you received? ______________________

21. What are the various CSR activities undertaken by the company according to your knowledge?

22. What kind of CSR activities do you expect from the companies?

(Kindly priorities the needs and expectations according to the following table)

Environment

Related

Employment

Socio- economic

Assistance

Related

Health

Related

Skill

development

training

Livelihood

Related

Education

Related

23. Household Head or Respondent Perceptions / Suggestions / Complaints regarding

Project:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 68

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

You have been most helpful and cooperative. Thank you very much.

Field Investigator Checked By Data Entry Operator

Signature & Date Signature & Date Signature & Date

Name: Name: Name:

SOP No. 09/28 Issue No.7.0

Page _ of _

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 69

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

ANNEXURE -II

VILLAGE PROFILE FORMAT

SURVEY FORMAT FOR DATA COLLECTION OF COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES

Village-Resource Mapping

1. Name of the Project :

2. Name of the State :

a) Name of the UT :

b) Name of the District :

c) Name of the Taluk/Tehsil/Block:

d) Name of the Village :

e) Name of the Gram Panchayat :

f) Date of Preliminary notification for land acquisition/date of declaration of affected area:

g) What are the Great Nicobar District notifications and court judgements?

h) What are the common property resource in tribal areas? Whether tribal use them?

i) In which areas Tribal Community reside or locate?

j) What is the distance from your village to Shompens/Nicobaries colony?

Distance from Shompens Colony ___________ Distance from Nicobaries colony

___________

(Source: Village Revenue Officer/ Secretor)

3. Area of the village in Hectares...........................

a) Total Land in Hectares:

b) No. of hectares forest land:

c) Agriculture Land:

d) Total irrigated area:

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 70

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

e) Total un-irrigated area:

f) Total Area not available for cultivation:

g) Total Govt. Land:

h) Total Private Land:

4. No. of House Holds:

3.1 Total Population (Persons) 1.Males: 2. Females:

3.2 SC Population: 1. Males: 2. Females:

3.3 ST Population: 1. Males: 2. Females:

5. Availability of Education Facilities:

a) No. of Pre-Primary Schools/ICDS 1. Private 2. Government

b) No. of Primary Schools 1. Private 2. Government

c) No. of Secondary/Middle Schools 1. Private 2. Government

d) No. of High Schools 1. Private 2. Government

e) No. of Colleges.............

1. Private Technical............Non- Technical..........Industrial training schools...

2. Government Technical............Non- Technical..........Industrial training schools...

f) No. of Colleges available within the range of 5kms to 10kms.

g) No. of Adult education centers/literacy centers..........

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 71

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

6. Availability of Medical Facilities:

a) No. of Allopathic Hospitals available within range of below 5 km...........

A. No. of Private.......... B. No. of Government.............

b)No. of Primary Health Centers................

A. No. of Private.......... B. No. of Government.............

c) No. of Area Hospitals...................

A. No. of Private.......... B. No. of Government.............

d)No. of Dispensaries/Nursing homes...........

A. No. of Private.......... B. No. of Government.............

e) No. of registered private medical practitioners............

f) No. of AYUSH Hospitals available within range of below 5 km

A. Private B. Government

g) No. of AYUSH Hospitals available within range of 5 to 10kms

A. Private B. Government

h)No. of Maternity and Child Welfare Centers available within range of 5 to10kms.

A. Private B. Government

i) Veterinary Hospital/ Dispensary

A. Private B. Government

7. Availability of Drinking water facilities:

1. Tap water 2. Well water 3. Tank water 4. Tube well water

5. Hand Pump 6.River Water 7. Canals 8. Lakes 9. Spring

8. Availability of Drainage facilities & Sanitation Facilities

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 72

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

1. Underground drainage pipe line 2. Covered Nala drainage 3 Open drainage

4. Underground drainage & Garbage bins 5. Garbage bins 6. Underground drainage

+ Community Toilets 7. Underground drainage + Community Toilets + Individual toilets

8A. Availability Municipal Waste Management Facilities How do you manage your generation

9. Availability of Community Infrastructure

1. Community Center 2.Women Thrift Cooperative 3. Stadium/ Play Ground 4. Youth Club

5. Library 6. Panchayat Building 7. Milk collection center and milk chilling center.

10. Availability of Travel & Transportation

1. Bus service 2.Train Services 3. Boat Services

11. Availability of Approach to Village

Paved roads 2. Mud roads 3. Foot path 4. River (boat) 5. Canal (boat)

12. Availability of Electricity

1. Domestic 2. Agriculture 3. All facilities

13. Availability of Cremation & Burial Ground

a) Burial and cremation ground available within one Km radius of the village

b) Only cremation ground available within one Km radius of the village

c) Only burial ground available within one Km radius of the village.

d) Cremation & burial ground available within 2-3 km radius

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 73

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

e) Cremation and burial ground not available.

13. Availability of Irrigation

1. Village Tank 2. Canal 3. River 4. Dam

14. Other Common property resources and public utilities

1. Community Pond 2. Cattle grazing land 3. Food storage facilities/go-downs 4. Fair Price shop

15. Availability of Common Trees & Plantation

1. No. of Fruit bearing trees 2. No. of share giving trees 3. No. of trees for fire wood and other

purpose

4. No. of trees having exclusive rights to a defined caste group or community and provides

Livelihood........

16. Availability of Religious Centers:

1. Temples 2. Mask 3. Church 4. Gurudwar 5. Any other traditional tribal or special places of worship mention................

Write a brief about Cultural importance of Village: (Includes History, customs, traditions and Jajmani

system)

Name of the

Village Revenue Officer/Secretory:

Mobile #

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 74

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

SOP No. 09/28 Issue No.7.0

Page _ of _

ANNEXURE-III

FGD FORMAT

FORMAT FOR FOCUSED GROUP DISCUSSION - FGD FGD No: _ _ _

NAME OF THE PROJECT: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1. Name of the Village/Ward: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date: _ _ _ _ _

2. FGD Location (Land mark):

3. Total no of participant’s in FGD:

4. Do you have any interaction with Tribals:

5. What is your opinion on the Shompens and other Tribal groups of the island?

6. Do Tribal students get scholarships? If yes how much?

7. No of tribal persons in Government Jobs and name of tribes in service

8. Participant’s constituency: Children/ Youth/ Women/ Teacher/ Retired Personnel/

Elderly people/ Elected Representative/ Community Based Organization-CBO/ Non-

Government Organization or any other_______

OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS

1. What do you like about the Project? Please explain.

2. Which type of projects will develop this area? Please explain

3. What are the required needs of the community?

4. What kind of CSR activities do you expect from the Company? (prioritize the

needs and expectations as per the following table)

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 75

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

Sr. No Particulars Participants Responses

1 Environment Related

2 Employment

3 Any other Socio- economic Assistance Related

4 Health Related

5 Skill development training

6 Tourism and Hospitality development

7 Nature based tourism

8 Port development

9 Port logistics

10 Commercial

11 Institutes

12 Entertainment

QUESTIONS TO GET MORE INFORMATION

1. What else can you say about the projects? Can you explain more?

2. Can you give us the examples?

3. Is there anything else you can add?

4. On a Scale of 1 to 5 how important is this (project) in your location? Why? Please

explain?

5. What are your suggestions for effective implementation of the project in your

location?

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 76

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

SOP No. 09/28 Issue No.7.0

Page _ of _

ANNEXURE-IV

IN-DEPTH INTERVIEW SCHEDULE

1. Name of the Hamlet / Village : Total population in the village:

2. Name of the respondent : Age; Sex: M/F

3. Address of the respondent : Mobile # /LL# /Email.

4. Educational qualification of the respondent:

5. Required needs of the village :

6. Do you have any interaction with tribes (Shompens)

7. Dominant ethnicity of the village :

8. Respondent’s constituency: Children/Youth/ Women/Teacher/Retired Personnel/

Elected Representative/ Community Based Organization-CBO/Non Government

Organization or any other_______

9. Are you aware if there is any forthcoming development initiative taking place in your

village?

a. If yes. Please specify in detailed.

10. How the forthcoming development initiative will create change in your village? If

yes. Please specify in detailed. If it is positive or negative explore in detailed

11. How it is helpful to children, women, SC’s, ST’s, Older and other marginalized

sections of the society.

12. What is your tentative plan of action to grab the opportunities created out of

forthcoming development initiative in your location?

13. What are the present facilities available right now in your location? If yes

a. By whom those services offering/Provided

14. Do you classify weather it is under CSR activities of the company/State/UT or Central

Govt

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 77

Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

15. Do you feel that, any change takes place with the forthcoming development initiative?

Weather in the form of positive or negative changes

16. As per your opinion how many people educated up to 10 Class

How many

ITI

Polytechnic Degree Engineering Post Graduate PhD

17. What would be your contribution in effective utilization of the expected positive

impacts out of the development initiatives?

18. What would be your contribution in reducing the negative impact of the development

initiative? Explain in detailed

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 78

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

ANNEXURE-V

VILLAGE WISE LAND USE DATA

Sr. No Village Name/Urban Area

To

tal

Geo

grap

hic

al

Area (

in

Hecta

res)

Fo

rest

Area (

in H

ecta

res)

Area I

rrig

ate

d b

y S

ou

rce (

in

Hecta

res)

To

tal

Un

irrig

ate

d L

an

d A

rea (

in

Hecta

res)

Lan

d U

nd

er M

iscell

an

eou

s T

ree

Cro

ps e

tc.

Area (

in H

ecta

res)

Area u

nd

er N

on

-Ag

ric

ult

ural

Uses

(in

Hecta

res)

Barren

& U

n-c

ult

ivab

le L

an

d A

rea

(in

Hecta

res)

Perm

an

en

t P

astu

res a

nd

Oth

er

Grazin

g L

an

d A

rea (

in H

ecta

res)

Cu

ltu

rab

le W

aste

Lan

d A

rea (

in

Hecta

res)

Fall

ow

s L

an

d o

ther t

han

Cu

rren

t

Fall

ow

s A

rea (

in H

ecta

res)

Cu

rren

t Fall

ow

s A

rea (

in

Hecta

res)

0-3 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

1 Nishana 1018.44 490.87 111 367.28 0 0 0 49.29 0 0 0

2 Achhalva 531.41 197.88 4 286.95 0 0 0 29.27 0 13.31 0

3 Sadadkuva 445.97 199.87 4 212.64 0 0 0 24.61 0 4.85 0

4 Pokhran 512.6 57.54 0 399.46 0 7.08 15.92 32.6 0 0 0

5 Kikakui 743.46 95.84 50 566 0 0 15.07 16.55 0 0 0

6 Mandal 690.4 135.9 48.3 297.9 0 0 0 157.2 51.1 0 0

7 Dosvada 1090.07 0 125 751.26 0 11.43 0 51.08 0 21.14 130.16

8 Kumkuva 688.31 0 7.3 344 0 0 272.39 64.62 0 0 0

9 Rupvada 299.16 0 6.58 286.83 0 4.08 1.67 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 6019.8 1177.9 356.18 3512.3 0 22.59 305.05 425.22 51.1 39.3 130.16

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 79

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

3-7 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

10 Jhadpati 133 0 38 59.31 0 1.2 25.74 8.75 0 0 0

11 Galkhadi 392.77 0 60 291.7 0 0 16.13 24.94 0 0 0

12 Moti Khervan 499.42 18 307 114.05 0 22.34 0 38.03 0 0 0

13 Vagda 352.61 0 32.2 116.64 0 56.3 135.33 12.14 0 0 0

14 Dumda 631.62 0.59 297.3 218.01 0 7.66 0 59.64 0 0 48.42

15 Amlipada 497.76 43.74 107.3 273.26 0 24.23 0 5.7 0 43.53 0

16 Kelai 444.32 0 95.25 287.5 0 40.19 0 21.38 0 0 0

17 Kavla 642.12 301.38 25 276.56 0 8.71 0 30.47 0 0 0

18 Amli 516.87 68.37 65.2 315.37 0 8.81 0 44.34 0 14.78 0

19 Champavadi 271.77 0 42.4 185.9 0 0 0 16.96 0 0 26.51

20 Chakalia 538.75 54.22 36.8 324.33 0 0 13.96 12.39 97.05 0 0

21 Khambhala 251.76 0 23.61 202 0 0 7.64 16.15 0 0 2.36

22 Chapaldhara 146.34 0 32.24 98.2 0 0 0 0 15.9 0 0

23 Raniamba 389.31 0 11 335.65 0 13.91 0.75 8.31 0 13.17 6.52

24 Balamrai 188.16 0 22.54 161.13 0 0 0 0 4.49 0 0

25 Tokarva (Segupada) 735.66 0 43.56 595.2 0 0 43.6 53.3 0 0 0

26 Tokarva (Jamankuva) 168.34 0 18.21 131.46 0 4 4.5 10.17 0 0 0

27 Kakad Kuva 210.16 13.65 9.8 167.7 0 0 1.97 3.61 9.42 0 4.01

28 Kharsi 415.45 30.83 26.5 300.7 0 2 6 49.42 0 0 0

29 Devalpada 210.9 29.23 7 143.56 0 0 0 24.89 6.22 0 0

30 Kanala 282.34 0 39 210.44 0 0 0 9.56 1.17 0 22.17

31 Chorvad 598.79 0 58.82 412.23 11.29 33.44 0.46 82.55 0 0 0

32 Chikhli Khadka 288.68 0 55.26 198.4 0 3.31 0 21.64 0 10.07 0

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 80

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

33 Junvan 503.87 0 14.5 399.34 0 5.09 9.41 68.25 0 7.28 0

34 Galkuva 539.05 0 70 443 0 0 0 26.05 0 0 0

35 Bedpada 366.55 140.93 11.5 186.11 0 0 5.16 22.85 0 0 0

36 Kanadevi 151.64 29.08 1.43 48.05 0 0 57.66 15.42 0 0 0

37 Rampura Kanadevi 220.43 42.64 35.9 62.42 0 0 0 21.11 0 56.21 2.15

38 Nana Bandharpada 204.44 0 22 149.15 0 1.9 5.12 20.28 0 5.99 0

39 Jharali 290.68 0 95.01 156.69 0 8.56 3 27.42 0 0 0

40 Kukradungri 201.45 2.93 11.25 154.91 0 0 5.91 26.45 0 0 0

41 Kukadjhar 169.65 0 39.92 104.14 0 5.03 2.24 16.92 0 0 1.4

42 Vadpada P Tokarva 4863.8 0.7 15.6 116.3 0 0 4714.6 16.6 0 0 0

43 Ghodchit 384.51 68.63 185.09 95.05 3.14 11.62 0.27 20.71 0 0 0

44 Bandharpada 204.44 0 63.5 80.74 0 31.4 0 28.8 0 0 0

45 Songhad 1597 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

46 Virpur 436.07 0 100.56 246.73 0 15.56 7.52 43.91 5.85 0 15.94

Sub Total 18940 844.92 2120.3 7661.9 14.43 305.26 5067 909.11 140.1 151.03 129.48

7-10 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

47 Dhajamba 747.95 0 450 240.04 0 0 4.24 27.48 6.12 0 20.07

48 Veljhar 587.52 142.39 230 102 1.86 0 1.37 41.5 0 68.4 0

49 Vajharda 645.81 48.97 75 415.84 0 22.56 22.03 59.9 1.51 0 0

50 Bedvan P Bhensrot 426.25 176.81 46.9 161.29 0 18.11 0 23.14 0 0 0

51 Ukhalda 726.08 0 285.1 307.17 0 93.62 0 38.15 0 2.04 0

52 Pipalkuva 789.16 0 53.28 504.88 87.94 75.3 0.61 67.15 0 0 0

53 Nani Khervan 301.32 0 190.59 60 0 30.63 1.3 8.41 0 0 10.39

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 81

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

54 Ghoda 607.34 67.1 328.62 13.09 0 7.94 17.83 30.7 61.08 0 80.98

55 Bhimpura 424.3 187.99 50 120.77 0 65.54 0 0 0 0 0

56 Gunsada 1199.72 106.83 395.14 223.69 2.88 149.19 17.83 67.64 76.22 13.12 147.18

57 Bedi 391.94 43.28 24.29 263.43 0 0 0 14.94 0 0 46

58 Agasvan 712.14 60 30.74 496.3 0 0 80.2 44.9 0 0 0

59 Gaisavar 267.98 0 46 142.47 0 1.11 2.81 62.05 0 13.54 0

60 Chimkuva 559.91 144.12 68.18 323.09 0 0 0 20.02 0 4.5 0

61 Nani Bhurvan 99.13 0 23.36 64.98 0 0 0.9 9.89 0 0 0

62 Medhsingi 346.67 2.6 21.64 270.51 0 4.96 34.94 0 0 0 12.02

63 Khokhsa 358.96 222.8 38.7 78.9 0 0 0 10.25 0 8.31 0

64 Moti Bhurvan 51.72 0 28.17 16.69 0 0.15 2.65 4.06 0 0 0

65 Hiravadi 399 0.24 21.35 314.4 0 16.07 6.5 32.87 7.37 0 0.2

66 Amba 274.18 0 12.45 230.69 0 0 2.2 27.71 0 1.13 0

67 Gatadi 232.27 0 54.65 140.1 0 0.97 11.73 24.82 0 0 0

68 Tichakia 143.38 0 25.1 95.2 0 9.54 13.54 0 0 0 0

69 Hanmantiya 367.03 0 35.1 247.22 0 7.5 30.26 33.46 0 8.31 5.18

70 Mahudi 241.58 0 8.1 170.12 0 10.11 29.52 23.73 0 0 0

71 Monghvan 603.89 118.5 44 330.12 0 5.57 0.02 43.29 14.54 47.85 0

72 Maiyali 288.51 64.36 34.28 151.5 0 3.15 0 22.08 13.14 0 0

73 Sandhkuva 224.26 0 19.8 167.1 0 3.08 7.53 21.39 0 5.36 0

74 Tarsadi 331.55 0 20 267.9 0 0 6.85 36.8 0 0 0

75 Kakad Kuva P Umarda 229.76 2.08 7.9 200.63 0 0 3.96 15.19 0 0 0

76 Bedvan P Umarda 253.08 7.84 13.55 139.84 71 0 0 16.19 0 4.66 0

77 Vadpada P Umarda 211.52 54.4 17.7 122.5 0 0 0 9.8 7.12 0 0

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 82

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

78 Chakvan 224.45 6.46 11.05 191.01 3.11 0 1.16 11.66 0 0 0

79 Borkuva 401.45 144.79 43.2 178.25 0 7.44 0 27.77 0 0 0

80 Kalaghat 279.05 78.38 25.6 152.37 0 0.92 0.4 21.38 0 0 0

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

81 Katiskuva Najik 620.21 99.2 61.29 359.47 0 0 6.29 72.13 1.6 20.23 0

82 Sarkuva 244.83 0 56.34 133.71 0 7.87 18.25 23.96 0 4.7 0

83 Katgadh 215.97 0 86.56 101.54 0 4.83 6.62 14.27 2.15 0 0

84 Bedkuva Najik 430 0 68.12 176.98 0 45.48 18.8 34.8 20 26 39.82

85 Kanpura 457.18 0 310.15 59.42 0 20 26.04 28.3 3.13 10.14 0

86 Tadkuva 461.22 0 100 273.8 0 1.18 8.06 38.3 0 22.93 16.95

87 Chikhli 681.68 0 172.66 400.09 0 10.99 12.76 52.49 5.99 9.7 17

88 Vaghjhari 454.03 0 100.18 298.19 0 0 7.84 24.88 8 7.93 7.01

89 Chikhalda 449.82 0 240.19 80 0 0 8.89 27.69 25.19 30.56 37.3

90 Saraiya 452.24 0 102.31 180.41 0 0 35.2 29.56 0.06 42.89 61.81

91 Pervad 332.94 31.6 110.22 145.03 0 4.4 36.59 4.73 0 0.37 0

Uchchhai taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

92 Pankhri 358.22 70.95 12.15 4 0 0 103.5 4 30 4 129.62

Sub Total 19107 1881.7 4199.7 9116.7 166.79 628.21 589.22 1253.4 283.22 356.67 631.53

Grand Total 44068 3904.5 6676.1 20291 181.22 956.06 5961.2 2587.8 474.42 547 891.17

Source: Census of India 2011.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 83

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

ANNEXURE-VI

VILLAGE WISE DEMOGRAPHIC DETAILS

Sl.

No. Name of Village

No

.of

Ho

use H

old

s

To

tal

Male

To

tal

Fem

ale

To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

Male

Belo

w 6

Ag

eg

ro

up

Fem

ale

Belo

w 6

Ag

eg

ro

up

Po

pu

lati

on

Belo

w 6

Ag

e g

ro

up

SC

Po

pu

lati

on

ST

Po

pu

lati

on

Male

Lit

erate

s

Fem

ale

Lit

erate

s

To

tal

Lit

erate

s

To

tal

Wo

rkers

Main

Wo

rkers

Marg

inal

Wo

rkers

No

n W

orkers

No

n W

orkers M

ale

No

n W

orkers F

em

ale

0-3 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

1 Nishana 393 919 884 1803 91 95 186 3 1775 652 490 1142 1173 561 612 630 319 311

2 Achhalva 134 332 312 644 42 33 75 0 642 213 176 389 446 385 61 198 105 93

3 Sadadkuva 297 661 662 1323 80 80 160 0 1317 369 286 655 822 795 27 501 232 269

4 Pokhran 103 308 243 551 29 27 56 0 410 258 186 444 303 301 2 248 128 120

5 Kikakui 552 1291 1337 2628 119 119 238 0 2608 960 847 1807 1574 779 795 1054 501 553

6 Mandal 467 1084 1124 2208 76 89 165 0 2189 809 678 1487 1139 940 199 1069 443 626

7 Dosvada 810 1988 1983 3971 204 234 438 6 3950 1345 1047 2392 2657 1405 1252 1314 661 653

8 Kumkuva 292 745 745 1490 88 83 171 0 1476 468 368 836 915 398 517 575 291 284

9 Rupvada 159 339 347 686 42 35 77 0 671 212 172 384 424 315 109 262 135 127

Sub Total 3207 7667 7637 15304 771 795 1566 9 15038 5286 4250 9536 9453 5879 3574 5851 2815 3036

3-7 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

10 Jhadpati 71 176 186 362 13 12 25 0 353 114 106 220 237 235 2 125 62 63

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 84

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

11 Galkhadi 143 317 312 629 28 26 54 0 629 206 175 381 287 268 19 342 117 225

12 Moti Khervan 544 1201 1308 2509 134 120 254 0 2502 778 680 1458 1630 1222 408 879 423 456

13 Vagda 353 794 838 1632 87 84 171 20 1483 519 419 938 939 451 488 693 313 380

14 Dumda 479 1078 1086 2164 107 108 215 0 2111 714 542 1256 878 634 244 1286 453 833

15 Amlipada 254 586 587 1173 50 47 97 0 1173 398 325 723 665 553 112 508 226 282

16 Kelai 287 636 649 1285 51 50 101 0 1285 412 340 752 724 425 299 561 230 331

17 Kavla 132 261 267 528 30 26 56 0 520 173 131 304 342 331 11 186 91 95

18 Amli 310 659 660 1319 66 77 143 3 1316 427 357 784 879 329 550 440 217 223

19 Champavadi 216 429 484 913 52 59 111 0 908 280 225 505 573 500 73 340 130 210

20 Chakalia 312 787 751 1538 96 70 166 0 1535 542 403 945 938 793 145 600 285 315

21 Khambhala 129 343 369 712 19 25 44 0 703 298 302 600 396 130 266 316 155 161

22 Chapaldhara 71 138 151 289 21 15 36 0 283 71 66 137 172 65 107 117 53 64

23 Raniamba 541 1382 1325 2707 173 158 331 8 2226 907 701 1608 1000 816 184 1707 643 1064

24 Balamrai 49 104 115 219 14 13 27 0 219 63 51 114 132 54 78 87 41 46

25 Tokarva (Segupada) 769 1671 1719 3390 181 185 366 7 3272 1044 807 1851 2099 1103 996 1291 603 688

26 Tokarva (Jamankuva) 158 337 336 673 36 37 73 0 656 198 159 357 400 147 253 273 110 163

27 Kakad Kuva 157 368 388 756 27 25 52 0 756 263 211 474 460 200 260 296 139 157

28 Kharsi 305 807 713 1520 75 76 151 0 1477 547 388 935 884 477 407 636 370 266

29 Devalpada 94 207 214 421 19 23 42 0 421 136 116 252 285 131 154 136 64 72

30 Kanala 215 553 587 1140 68 59 127 0 1138 375 307 682 761 558 203 379 177 202

31 Chorvad 386 905 958 1863 81 111 192 0 1861 611 480 1091 1208 993 215 655 301 354

32 Chikhli Khadka 285 629 622 1251 53 51 104 0 1189 477 344 821 881 713 168 370 179 191

33 Junvan 168 358 390 748 35 48 83 0 747 237 206 443 504 400 104 244 102 142

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 85

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

34 Galkuva 372 833 892 1725 63 85 148 0 1710 624 535 1159 1006 695 311 719 274 445

35 Bedpada 116 271 282 553 26 18 44 0 553 204 195 399 181 177 4 372 112 260

36 Kanadevi 61 124 123 247 17 9 26 0 247 73 60 133 159 43 116 88 49 39

37 Rampura Kanadevi 140 287 297 584 37 36 73 0 576 159 122 281 387 117 270 197 99 98

38 Nana Bandharpada 124 311 297 608 29 31 60 0 606 221 172 393 392 47 345 216 106 110

39 Jharali 171 389 382 771 43 48 91 0 769 274 241 515 501 170 331 270 132 138

40 Kukradungri 128 282 286 568 32 20 52 0 565 147 138 285 421 415 6 147 73 74

41 Kukadjhar 69 151 157 308 14 16 30 0 307 118 98 216 205 105 100 103 58 45

42 Vadpada P Tokarva 110 257 248 505 28 21 49 0 505 165 123 288 355 60 295 150 78 72

43 Ghodchit 273 651 651 1302 63 65 128 0 1276 420 333 753 646 550 96 656 224 432

44 Bandharpada 321 729 746 1475 75 48 123 32 1415 482 437 919 917 670 247 558 265 293

45 Songadh (M) 5331 13518 12997 26515 1847 1699 3546 712 5792 10201 8385 18586 10049 7948 2101 16466 6001 10465

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

46 Virpur 216 466 464 930 43 41 84 15 874 347 305 652 445 349 96 485 164 321

Sub Total 13860 32995 32837 65832 3833 3642 7475 797 43958 23225 18985 42210 32938 22874 10064 32894 13119 19775

7-10 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

47 Dhajamba 634 1562 1584 3146 155 143 298 0 3126 969 829 1798 1953 1348 605 1193 620 573

48 Veljhar 199 426 448 874 34 40 74 0 871 260 232 492 498 496 2 376 156 220

49 Vajharda 525 1237 1168 2405 140 120 260 1 2369 732 586 1318 1504 1091 413 901 446 455

50 Bedvan P Bhensrot 137 300 304 604 26 28 54 0 597 167 147 314 438 374 64 166 83 83

51 Ukhalda 643 1577 1547 3124 158 148 306 16 3051 1031 847 1878 1862 1388 474 1262 651 611

52 Pipalkuva 571 1320 1370 2690 141 136 277 0 2677 895 793 1688 1685 1323 362 1005 460 545

53 Nani Khervan 191 452 466 918 41 40 81 0 918 318 245 563 478 181 297 440 173 267

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 86

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

54 Ghoda 353 810 793 1603 96 85 181 0 1600 496 398 894 1004 453 551 599 321 278

55 Bhimpura 753 1701 1688 3389 201 182 383 183 1935 1256 1025 2281 1555 1413 142 1834 726 1108

56 Gunsada 1233 2694 2634 5328 291 276 567 16 4665 1774 1392 3166 2675 1650 1025 2653 1113 1540

57 Bedi 328 737 759 1496 85 60 145 0 1487 520 462 982 932 412 520 564 272 292

58 Agasvan 499 1054 1129 2183 110 103 213 0 2112 768 712 1480 1176 958 218 1007 380 627

59 Gaisavar 126 301 274 575 44 33 77 0 570 190 146 336 264 212 52 311 159 152

60 Chimkuva 265 586 591 1177 78 64 142 0 1173 355 261 616 694 491 203 483 205 278

61 Nani Bhurvan 19 34 38 72 3 0 3 0 72 26 20 46 51 18 33 21 12 9

62 Medhsingi 216 543 540 1083 64 52 116 0 1079 316 260 576 646 634 12 437 205 232

63 Khokhsa 62 125 135 260 17 19 36 0 258 77 69 146 165 80 85 95 41 54

64 Moti Bhurvan 46 108 107 215 9 13 22 0 212 81 57 138 145 64 81 70 34 36

65 Hiravadi 307 589 643 1232 61 68 129 0 1228 331 346 677 810 624 186 422 191 231

66 Amba 203 491 553 1044 56 64 120 0 1042 353 342 695 671 497 174 373 164 209

67 Gatadi 181 364 379 743 35 47 82 0 741 256 206 462 458 381 77 285 127 158

68 Tichakia 138 324 320 644 29 22 51 0 635 239 201 440 445 293 152 199 96 103

69 Hanmantiya 226 516 558 1074 51 74 125 0 1074 365 283 648 628 622 6 446 206 240

70 Mahudi 97 204 209 413 24 21 45 0 413 135 100 235 292 261 31 121 61 60

71 Monghvan 431 1035 1048 2083 111 115 226 0 2075 622 473 1095 1425 478 947 658 333 325

72 Maiyali 168 360 377 737 28 41 69 0 735 255 216 471 475 469 6 262 125 137

73 Sandhkuva 155 366 381 747 19 19 38 0 744 240 188 428 320 147 173 427 175 252

74 Tarsadi 197 488 486 974 53 49 102 0 970 286 237 523 422 290 132 552 208 344

75 Kakad Kuva P Umarda 169 344 365 709 36 45 81 0 707 241 221 462 382 198 184 327 141 186

76 Bedvan P Umarda 146 289 304 593 40 33 73 0 593 194 164 358 453 157 296 140 70 70

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 87

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

77 Vadpada P Umarda 269 585 616 1201 68 63 131 9 1177 369 321 690 823 500 323 378 181 197

78 Chakvan 211 404 420 824 32 40 72 0 824 302 246 548 600 163 437 224 108 116

79 Borkuva 191 455 423 878 50 48 98 2 846 346 231 577 555 188 367 323 177 146

80 Kalaghat 151 347 347 694 27 31 58 0 690 212 173 385 370 285 85 324 125 199

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

81 Katiskuva Najik 297 623 667 1290 66 71 137 8 1229 420 352 772 893 845 48 397 182 215

82 Sarkuva 224 527 537 1064 39 47 86 0 1042 407 327 734 637 503 134 427 207 220

83 Katgadh 85 170 202 372 22 21 43 0 372 129 153 282 215 198 17 157 66 91

84 Bedkuva Najik 262 612 632 1244 72 76 148 0 1002 432 416 848 785 533 252 459 216 243

85 Kanpura 782 1725 1674 3399 165 141 306 64 2738 1453 1297 2750 1746 1396 350 1653 743 910

86 Tadkuva 473 1057 1102 2159 149 131 280 0 1533 655 559 1214 1018 896 122 1141 438 703

87 Chikhli 558 1279 1318 2597 119 114 233 8 2465 937 772 1709 1692 1641 51 905 431 474

88 Vaghjhari 159 359 364 723 38 35 73 0 716 234 179 413 477 353 124 246 114 132

89 Chikhalda 404 879 929 1808 84 94 178 0 1803 575 470 1045 1180 858 322 628 288 340

90 Saraiya 318 686 755 1441 71 85 156 0 1403 415 405 820 944 597 347 497 219 278

91 Pervad 264 655 622 1277 71 55 126 0 1274 410 301 711 852 648 204 425 233 192

Uchchhai taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

92 Pankhri 272 577 606 1183 70 74 144 0 1173 345 271 616 734 727 7 449 214 235

Sub Total 14138 31877 32412 64289 3379 3266 6645 307 60016 21389 17931 39320 38027 27334 10693 26262 11896 14366

Grand Total 31205 72539 72886 145425 7983 7703 15686 1113 119012 49900 41166 91066 80418 56087 24331 65007 27830 37177

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 88

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

ANNEXURE-VII

VILLAGE WISE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IN THE RURAL STUDY AREA

Sr.

No

Vil

lag

e N

am

e/

Urb

an

Area

Go

vt

Prim

ary S

ch

oo

l

(N

um

bers)

Priv

ate

P

rim

ary S

ch

oo

l

(N

um

bers)

Go

vt

Mid

dle

Sch

oo

l

(N

um

bers)

Priv

ate

Mid

dle

Sch

oo

l

(N

um

bers)

Go

vt

Seco

nd

ary S

ch

oo

l

(N

um

bers)

Priv

ate

Seco

nd

ary

Sch

oo

l

(N

um

bers)

Go

vt

Sen

ior S

eco

nd

ary

Sch

oo

l (N

um

bers)

Priv

ate

Sen

ior S

eco

nd

ary

Sch

oo

l (N

um

bers)

Go

vt

Arts

an

d S

cie

nce

Deg

ree C

olleg

e (

Nu

mb

ers)

Priv

ate

A

rts

an

d S

cie

nce

Deg

ree C

olleg

e (

Nu

mb

ers)

Go

vt

En

gin

eerin

g C

oll

eg

e

(N

um

bers)

Priv

ate

En

gin

eerin

g C

oll

eg

e

(N

um

bers)

Go

vt

Med

icin

e C

oll

eg

e

(N

um

bers)

Priv

ate

Med

icin

e C

oll

eg

e

(N

um

bers)

Go

vt

Po

lyte

ch

nic

(N

um

bers)

Go

vt

Vo

cati

on

al

Train

ing

Sch

oo

l/IT

I (

Nu

mb

ers)

Priv

ate

Vo

cati

on

al

Train

ing

Sch

oo

l/IT

I (

Nu

mb

ers)

Go

vern

men

t S

ch

oo

l Fo

r

Dis

ab

led

(N

um

bers)

Priv

ate

Sch

oo

l Fo

r D

isab

led

(N

um

bers)

0-3 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

1 Nishana 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Achhalva 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Sadadkuva 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Pokhran 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Kikakui 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Mandal 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Dosvada 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8 Kumkuva 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9 Rupvada 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 18 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 89

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

3-7 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

10 Jhadpati 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 Galkhadi 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

12 Moti Khervan 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13 Vagda 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

14 Dumda 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

15 Amlipada 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

16 Kelai 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

17 Kavla 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

18 Amli 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

19 Champavadi 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

20 Chakalia 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

21 Khambhala 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

22 Chapaldhara 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

23 Raniamba 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

24 Balamrai 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

25 Tokarva (Segupada) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

26 Tokarva (Jamankuva) 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

27 Kakad Kuva 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

28 Kharsi 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

29 Devalpada 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

30 Kanala 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

31 Chorvad 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

32 Chikhli Khadka 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 90

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

33 Junvan 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

34 Galkuva 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

35 Bedpada 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

36 Kanadevi 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

37 Rampura Kanadevi 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

38 Nana Bandharpada 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

39 Jharali 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

40 Kukradungri 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

41 Kukadjhar 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

42 Vadpada P Tokarva 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

43 Ghodchit 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

44 Bandharpada 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

45 Virpur 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 49 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7-10 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

46 Dhajamba 3 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

47 Veljhar 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

48 Vajharda 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

49 Bedvan P Bhensrot 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

50 Ukhalda 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

51 Pipalkuva 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

52 Nani Khervan 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

53 Ghoda 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 91

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

54 Bhimpura 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

55 Gunsada 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

56 Bedi 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

57 Agasvan 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

58 Gaisavar 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

59 Chimkuva 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

60 Nani Bhurvan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

61 Medhsingi 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

62 Khokhsa 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

63 Moti Bhurvan 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

64 Hiravadi 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

65 Amba 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

66 Gatadi 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

67 Tichakia 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

68 Hanmantiya 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

69 Mahudi 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

70 Monghvan 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

71 Maiyali 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

72 Sandhkuva 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

73 Tarsadi 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

74 Kakad Kuva P Umarda 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

75 Bedvan P Umarda 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

76 Vadpada P Umarda 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

77 Chakvan 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 92

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

78 Borkuva 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

79 Kalaghat 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

80 Katiskuva Najik 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

81 Sarkuva 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

82 Katgadh 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

83 Bedkuva Najik 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

84 Kanpura 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

85 Tadkuva 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

86 Chikhli 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

87 Vaghjhari 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

88 Chikhalda 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

89 Saraiya 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

90 Pervad 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Uchchhai taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

91 Pankhri 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 70 2 0 0 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Grand Total 137 2 0 0 7 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Source: Census of India 2011.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 93

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

ANNEXURE-VIII

VILLAGE WISE HEALTH FACILITIES IN THE RURAL STUDY AREA

Sr.

No

Village

Name/Urban Area

Co

mm

un

ity

Healt

h C

en

tre

(N

um

bers)

Prim

ary H

ealt

h

Cen

tre

(N

um

bers)

Prim

ary H

ealt

h

Su

b C

en

tre

(N

um

bers)

Mate

rn

ity A

nd

Ch

ild

Welf

are

Cen

tre

(N

um

bers)

TB

Clin

ic

(N

um

bers)

Ho

sp

ital

All

op

ath

ic

(N

um

bers)

Dis

pen

sary

(N

um

bers)

Vete

rin

ary

Ho

sp

ital

(N

um

bers)

Mo

bil

e H

ealt

h

Clin

ic

(N

um

bers)

Fam

ily W

elf

are

Cen

tre

(N

um

bers)

0-3 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

1 Nishana 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Achhalva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Sadadkuva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Pokhran 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Kikakui 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Mandal 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Dosvada 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8 Kumkuva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9 Rupvada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3-7 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

10 Jhadpati 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 Galkhadi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

12 Moti Khervan 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 94

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

13 Vagda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

14 Dumda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

15 Amlipada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

16 Kelai 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

17 Kavla 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

18 Amli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

19 Champavadi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

20 Chakalia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

21 Khambhala 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

22 Chapaldhara 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

23 Raniamba 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

24 Balamrai 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

25 Tokarva (Segupada) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

26 Tokarva (Jamankuva) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

27 Kakad Kuva 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

28 Kharsi 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

29 Devalpada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

30 Kanala 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

31 Chorvad 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

32 Chikhli Khadka 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

33 Junvan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

34 Galkuva 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

35 Bedpada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

36 Kanadevi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 95

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

37 Rampura Kanadevi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

38 Nana Bandharpada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

39 Jharali 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

40 Kukradungri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

41 Kukadjhar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

42 Vadpada P Tokarva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

43 Ghodchit 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

44 Bandharpada 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

45 Virpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 0 1 10 0 1 1 0 0 1 0

7-10 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

46 Dhajamba 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

47 Veljhar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

48 Vajharda 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

49 Bedvan P Bhensrot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

50 Ukhalda 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

51 Pipalkuva 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

52 Nani Khervan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

53 Ghoda 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

54 Bhimpura 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

55 Gunsada 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

56 Bedi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

57 Agasvan 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 96

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

58 Gaisavar 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

59 Chimkuva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

60 Nani Bhurvan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

61 Medhsingi 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

62 Khokhsa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

63 Moti Bhurvan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

64 Hiravadi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

65 Amba 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

66 Gatadi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

67 Tichakia 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

68 Hanmantiya 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

69 Mahudi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

70 Monghvan 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

71 Maiyali 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

72 Sandhkuva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

73 Tarsadi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

74 Kakad Kuva P Umarda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

75 Bedvan P Umarda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

76 Vadpada P Umarda 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

77 Chakvan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

78 Borkuva 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

79 Kalaghat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Vyara taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

80 Katiskuva Najik 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 97

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

81 Sarkuva 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

82 Katgadh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

83 Bedkuva Najik 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

84 Kanpura 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

85 Tadkuva 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

86 Chikhli 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

87 Vaghjhari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

88 Chikhalda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

89 Saraiya 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

90 Pervad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Uchchhai taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

91 Pankhri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Sub Total 0 2 19 0 1 2 0 0 1 0

Grand Total 0 3 32 0 2 3 0 0 2 0

Source: Census of India 2011.

*Note: 1= Available; 0= Not Available.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 98

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

ANNEXURE-IX

VILLAGE WISE DRINKING WATER FACILITIES

Sr.

No

Village

Name/Urban Area

Tap

Wate

r-T

reate

d

(G

ovt(

1)/

Priv

ate

(0

)

Tap

Wate

r U

ntr

eate

d

(G

ovt(

1)/

Priv

ate

(0

)

Co

vered

Well

(G

ovt(

1)/

Priv

ate

(0

)

Un

co

vered

W

ell

(G

ovt(

1)/

Priv

ate

(0

)

Han

d P

um

p

(G

ovt(

1)/

Priv

ate

(0

)

Tu

be W

ells/

Bo

reh

ole

(G

ovt(

1)/

Priv

ate

(0

)

Sp

rin

g

(G

ovt(

1)/

Priv

ate

(0

)

Riv

er/

Can

al

(G

ovt(

1)/

Priv

ate

(0

)

Tan

k/

Po

nd

/Lak

e

(G

ovt(

1)/

Priv

ate

(0

)

Oth

ers

(G

ovt(

1)/

Priv

ate

(0

)

0-3 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

1 Nishana 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

2 Achhalva 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

3 Sadadkuva 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

4 Pokhran 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

5 Kikakui 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

6 Mandal 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0

7 Dosvada 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0

8 Kumkuva 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0

9 Rupvada 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0

Sub Total 0 4 0 9 9 7 0 3 2 0

3-7 kms Songadh taluka, Tapi district, Gujarat

10 Jhadpati 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Greenfield Zinc Smelter Complex (1x0.35 MTPA Zinc Smelter along with Fumer Plant), 2x90 MW Captive Power Plant and 35 MW WHRB at GIDC Doswada, Taluka Songadh, District Tapi, Gujarat

Social Impact Assessment(SIA)

VIMTA Labs Limited, Hyderabad 99

Sensitivity: Internal (C3) Sensitivity: Internal (C3)

11 Galkhadi 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

12 Moti Khervan 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0

13 Vagda 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

14 Dumda 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0

15 Amlipada 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0

16 Kelai 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

17 Kavla 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

18 Amli 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

19 Champavadi 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0

20 Chakalia 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

21 Khambhala 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0

22 Chapaldhara 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

23 Raniamba 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0

24 Balamrai 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

25 Tokarva (Segupada) 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

26 Tokarva (Jamankuva) 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

27 Kakad Kuva 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

28 Kharsi 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

29 Devalpada 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

30 Kanala 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0

31 Chorvad 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

32 Chikhli Khadka 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0

33 Junvan 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

34 Galkuva 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0

35 Bedpada 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

36 Kanadevi 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

37 Rampura Kanadevi 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

38 Nana Bandharpada 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0