Agenda - Meetings, agendas, and minutes - Cumbria County ...

302
Resources Legal and Democratic Services The Lonsdale Building The Courts Carlisle Cumbria CA3 8NA Fax 01228 226372 Tel 01228 606060 Email [email protected] 12 March 2013 To: The Chair and Members of the County Council Local Committee for Carlisle Agenda COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE A meeting of the County Council Local Committee for Carlisle will be held as follows: Date: Wednesday 20 March 2013 Time: 10.30 am Place: Committee Room 2, The Courts, Carlisle, CA3 8NA Caroline Elwood Interim Assistant Director – Legal and Democratic Services Please note: There will be a ½ hour private member briefing following the Local Committee to recap the last four years of business including identifying achievements and challenges moving forward. Group Meetings: Labour: 9.00am Kraemer Room Conservative: 9.00am Committee Room No 4 Liberal Democrat: 9.00am Liberal Democrat Group Office Enquiries and requests for supporting papers to: Lynn Harker Direct Line: 01228 226364 Email: [email protected] This agenda is available on request in alternative formats Serving the People of Cumbria

Transcript of Agenda - Meetings, agendas, and minutes - Cumbria County ...

Resources Legal and Democratic Services � The Lonsdale Building � The Courts � Carlisle

Cumbria � CA3 8NA � Fax 01228 226372 Tel 01228 606060 � Email [email protected]

12 March 2013

To: The Chair and Members of the County

Council Local Committee for Carlisle

Agenda

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE A meeting of the County Council Local Committee for Carlisle will be held as follows: Date: Wednesday 20 March 2013

Time: 10.30 am

Place: Committee Room 2, The Courts, Carlisle, CA3 8NA

Caroline Elwood Interim Assistant Director – Legal and Democratic Services Please note: There will be a ½ hour private member briefing following the Local Committee to recap the last four years of business including identifying achievements and challenges moving forward. Group Meetings: Labour: 9.00am Kraemer Room Conservative: 9.00am Committee Room No 4 Liberal Democrat: 9.00am Liberal Democrat Group Office Enquiries and requests for supporting papers to: Lynn Harker Direct Line: 01228 226364 Email: [email protected]

This agenda is available on request in alternative formats

Serving the People of Cumbria

MEMBERSHIP

Conservative (7) Labour (8) Liberal Democrat (1)

Mr J Mallinson (Vice-Chair) Mr LN Fisher Mrs EA Mallinson Mr NH Marriner Mrs FJ Robson Mr A Toole Mrs V Tarbitt

Mr J Bell Mrs H Bradley Mr H McDevitt Mr I Stockdale Mr R Watson Mr C Weber (Chair) Mr W Whalen Mr SF Young

Mr T Allison

Genuine Independent (1) Mr RW Betton

ACCESS TO INFORMATION Agenda and Reports Copies of the agenda and Part I reports are available for members of the public to inspect prior to the meeting. Copies will also be available at the meeting. The agenda and Part I reports are also available on the County Council’s website – www.cumbria.gov.uk Background Papers Requests for the background papers to the Part I reports, excluding those papers that contain exempt information, can be made to Legal and Democratic Services at the address overleaf between the hours of 9.00 am and 4.30 pm, Monday to Friday.

A G E N D A PART 1: ITEMS LIKELY TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE PRESS

AND PUBLIC

1 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

To receive any apologies for absence. 2 DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST

Members are invited to disclose any disclosable pecuniary interest they have in any item on the agenda which comprises

1 Details of any employment, office, trade, profession or vocation carried on for

profit or gain. 2 Details of any payment or provision of any other financial benefit (other than from

the authority) made or provided within the relevant period in respect of any expenses incurred by you in carrying out duties as a member, or towards your election expenses. (This includes any payment or financial benefit from a trade union within the meaning of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.

3 Details of any contract which is made between you (or a body in which you have

a beneficial interest) and the authority (a) Under which goods or services are to be provided or works are to be

executed; and (b) Which has not been fully discharged. 4 Details of any beneficial interest in land which is within the area of the authority. 5 Details of any licence (alone or jointly with others) to occupy land in the area of

the authority for a month or longer. 6 Details of any tenancy where (to your knowledge) (a) The landlord is the authority; and (b) The tenant is a body in which you have a beneficial interest. 7 Details of any beneficial interest in securities of a body where (a) That body (to your knowledge) has a place of business or land in the area

of the authority; and

(b) Either –

(i) The total nominal value of the securities exceeds £25,000 or one hundredth of the total issued share capital of that body; or

(ii) If that share capital of that body is of more than one class, the total

nominal value of the shares of any one class in which the relevant person has a beneficial interest exceeds one hundredth of the total issued share capital of that class.

In addition, you must also disclose other non-pecuniary interests set out in the Code of Conduct where these have not already been registered. Note A “disclosable pecuniary interest” is an interest of a councillor or their partner (which means spouse or civil partner, a person with whom they are living as husband or wife, or a person with whom they are living as if they are civil partners). 3 EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC

To consider whether the press and public should be excluded from the meeting during consideration of any item on the agenda. 4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

There were no public questions, deputations or petitions to be considered at this meeting. 5 MINUTES

To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the meeting of the Local Committee held on 5 February 2013 (copy enclosed). (Pages 1 - 14) EXECUTIVE BUSINESS 6 CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE DEVOLVED BUDGET 2012/13

[Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle] a Communities Budget

To consider a report by the Corporate Director – Resources (copy enclosed).

This report presents the actual expenditure and commitments recorded against the Local Committee’s Communities Budget as at 28 February 2013.

(Pages 15 - 32)

b Highways Budget

To consider a report by the Corporate Director – Resources (copy to follow).

This report presents the actual expenditure and commitments recorded against the Local Committee’s Highways Revenue and Capital Budgets as at 28 February 2013.

7 HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP

[Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle] To consider a report by the Corporate Director – Environment (copy enclosed). This report provides details of the meeting of the Highways and Transport Working Group held on 28 February 2013 and presents recommendations for the Local Committee to consider. (Pages 33 - 148) 8 IMPACT OF CNDR - TRAFFIC CALMING

[Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle] To consider a report by the Corporate Director – Environment (copy enclosed). This report updates members on the progress of the Traffic Calming proposals aimed at mitigating the impact of changes to traffic movements following the opening of the Carlisle Northern Development Route (CNDR). (Pages 149 - 156) 9 VIADUCT ESTATE CYCLE LINK - FUNDING OPTIONS

[Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle] To consider a report by the Corporate Director – Environment (copy to follow). This report provides details of funding options for the Viaduct Estate cycle link.

10 DENTON HOLME LIBRARY OPENING HOURS

[Electoral Division: Denton Holme] To consider a report from the Corporate Director – Adult and Local Services (copy enclosed). This report sets out proposals to change the existing opening hours and improve access to the library services at Denton Holme. (Pages 157 - 160) 11 COMMUNITIES BUDGET 2013/14

[Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle] To consider a report by the Chief Executive (copy enclosed). This report sets out the budget for 2013/14 as set by Cabinet and Council and seeks confirmation from the Local Committee on identifying key allocations and commitments for the 2013/14 year. (Pages 161 - 176) 12 ELECTORAL DIVISION LOCAL MEMBER SCHEMES

[Electoral Divisions: Belle Vue, Castle, Currock, Dalston & Cummersdale, Longtown & Bewcastle, Stanwix & Irthington and Upperby] To consider a report by the Chief Executive (copy enclosed). This report seeks to commit elements of the Local Revenue Scheme budget and includes members proposals that have been sufficiently worked up to enable the Local Committee to consider spending decisions. (Pages 177 - 200) 13 CARLISLE AREA GRANTS FUND

[Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle] To consider a report by the Chief Executive (copy enclosed). This report outlines requests for grant funding. (Pages 201 - 208)

14 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITY

[Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle] To consider a report by the Chief Executive (copy enclosed). This report details recent community activities delivered in the Carlisle Area and provides a summary of Forum Grants awarded to date. (Pages 209 - 224) 15 COMMUNITY ASSET TRANSFER - BRAMPTON INFANT SCHOOL

BUILDINGS

[Electoral Divisions: Brampton and Gilsland] To consider a report from the Chief Executive (copy enclosed). This report presents a request from the Brampton and Beyond Community Trust seeking the approval of members to proceed with the Community Asset Transfer process. (Pages 225 - 236) 16 COMMUNITY ASSET TRANSFER - LAND ADJACENT TO WALTON VILLAGE

GREEN

[Electoral Divisions: Brampton and Gilsland] To consider a report from the Chief Executive (copy enclosed). This report presents a request from Walton Parish Council seeking the approval of members to proceed with the Community Asset Transfer process. (Pages 237 - 246) 17 APPOINTMENT OF GOVERNORS FOR NURSERY, PRIMARY AND

SECONDARY SCHOOLS

[Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle] To consider a schedule by the Corporate Director – Children’s Services (copy enclosed). A schedule of recommendations for local authority governor appointments to schools in Carlisle. (Pages 247 - 248)

FOR INFORMATION/MONITORING REPORTS 18 CARLISLE SPORTS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION

(SPAAF)

[Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle] To consider a report by the Chief Executive (copy enclosed). This report provides members with details of a presentation received by the 0-19 Task and Finish Group on the activities of the Carlisle and District Sport and Physical Activity Alliance Foundation (SPAAF) over the last 12 months. (Pages 249 - 256) 19 CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE SEMINAR - TUESDAY 22 JANUARY 2013

To receive the notes of the Carlisle Local Committee Seminar held on Tuesday 22 January 2013 (copy enclosed). (Pages 257 - 262) 20 LOCAL LEADERSHIP AND CHAIRS MEETING - WEDNESDAY 23 JANUARY

2013

To receive the minutes of the meeting of the Local Leadership and Chairs meeting held on 23 January 2013 (copy enclosed). (Pages 263 - 268) 21 LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE - FORWARD PLAN

[Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle] The Forward Plan of items for meetings of the Local Committee for Carlisle is attached for information. There will be a ½ hour private member briefing following the Local Committee to recap the last four years of business including identifying achievements and challenges moving forward. (Pages 269 - 270)

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Minutes of a Meeting of the County Council Local Committee for Carlisle held on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 at 10.30 am at Committee Room 2, The Courts, English Street, Carlisle.

PRESENT:

Mr C Weber (Chair)

Mr T Allison Mr J Bell Mr RW Betton Mrs H Bradley Mr LN Fisher Mrs EA Mallinson Mr J Mallinson (Vice-Chair)

Mr NH Marriner Mr H McDevitt Mr I Stockdale Mr A Toole Mr R Watson Mr W Whalen Mr SF Young

Also in Attendance:- Mr T Chew - Finance Manager Mrs C Cowperthwaite - Locality Transport Team Leader Mr K Crawley - Traffic Management Engineer Mr M Foster - Service Manager Mrs L Harker - Democratic Services Officer Ms J King - Carlisle Locality Officer Mr J Macilwraith - Assistant Director - Strategy & Commissioning,

Children's Services Ms H Moffatt - Group Solicitor Mr D Sheard - Area Support Manager North Mr J Sims - Assistant Director - People Management Mrs G Ternent - Strategic Policy Advisor Ms J Williamson - Focus Family Co-ordinator

PART 1 – ITEMS CONSIDERED IN THE

PRESENCE OF THE PUBLIC AND PRESS

108 MATTER OF URGENCY In accordance with the Local Government Act 1972 the Chair had agreed that consideration be given to the report on the Electoral Division Local Member Schemes as a matter of urgency given that a decision at the next meeting of the Local Committee in March would be too late to ensure the redevelopment project at Denton Holme Community Centre would be able to go ahead as scheduled (minute 121(13) refers).

Agenda Item 5

Page 1

109 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Mrs FJ Robson and Mrs V Tarbitt. 110 DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST Mrs EA Mallinson declared a non-pecuniary interest in agenda item 17 – Contracted Youth Provision Performance as her husband was a member of the Board at Carlisle Youth Zone. Mr J Mallinson declared a non-pecuniary interest in agenda item 17 – Contracted Youth Provision Performance as he was a member of the Board at Carlisle Youth Zone Board. Mr SF Young declared a non-pecuniary interest in agenda item 14 – 0-19 Services Grants Budget as he was the Honorary President of Reivers District Scouts. 111 EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC RESOLVED, that the press and public be not excluded from the meeting for any

items of business. 112 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION There were no public questions, deputations or petitions relating to the business of the Committee on this occasion. 113 FOCUS FAMILIES Jane Williamson, Senior Manager - Focus Family Co-ordinator gave a presentation on Focus Families. She explained that the County Council had decided that the families benefitting from this approach would be referred to as ‘focus’ and not ‘troubled’ families. She informed members that there were both national and local programmes which included the following:-

Ø European Social Fund/Department for Work and Pensions Ø Passport Families Ø Family Intervention Family Centres Children’s Centres Ø Love Barrow Families Ø Partnership: District Delivery Groups Ø Troubled Families

Page 2

The Government had estimated that, on average, each ‘focus family’ costs the public sector (ie local authority, police and health) £10,000 per annum and currently £9 billion per annum was spent nationwide on those families, with £8 billion of this funding being spent on reacting to problems rather than solving them. There was additional funding being offered to local authorities to cover the cost of extra resources to help find alternative ways of working with focus families to reduce the current high levels of spending and help improve the effectiveness of interventions. The framework for supporting children’s needs would include early help, early intervention, targeted intervention and intensive intervention. Members were informed that the majority of children and young people would be supported to achieve successful outcomes with ‘early help’. She then went on to outline the Government’s three national criteria for Focus Families and informed members that each authority had to have at least two of these with the option to have a third one of local discretion in their plan. She said that the Authority worked closely with other agencies including schools, police, children’s centres, youth offending services and more recently the Department of Works and Pensions to help with the identification of families and was pleased to report the excellent relationships which had developed between the different organisations. In summing up members were informed that the next steps included:-

Ø Awareness Training Ø Collection of Data Ø Identifying and Providing Support to Families

The Chair thanked the officer for her informative presentation and said he would welcome a further report to the Committee in 12 months time. 114 MINUTES RESOLVED, that the minutes of the meeting held on 12 December 2012 be

confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. 115 CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE DEVOLVED BUDGET 2012/13 (1) Communities Budget The Local Committee had before it a report by the Corporate Director – Resources which presented the actual expenditure and commitments recorded against the Local Committee’s Communities budget as at 31 December 2012. During the course of discussion a member asked why the committed £14,620 for school road safety upgrades had not been spent and the Area Support Manager agreed to look into this and report back to members.

Page 3

RESOLVED, that (a) the budget allocations for 2012-13 and the commitments and

expenditure recorded to date be noted; (b) the unallocated resources in the Communities Revenue

budgets of £348,880 be noted; (c) the unallocated resources in the Local Member Capital

Schemes budgets of £1,861 be noted; (d) the amendments to the Harraby Revenue Local Member

Scheme budget line to reduce the previously agreed amounts awarded to Harraby Together we Can from £19,000 to £17,482 be approved;

(e) the overspend of £1,610 on the provision of bus shelters in

the General Provision budget and Local Member Scheme revenue and capital (Botcherby) budgets (Geltsdale Avenue and Victoria Road bus shelters) be funded from the Neighbourhood Forum budget for Botcherby.

(2) Highways Budget The Local Committee had before it a report by the Corporate Director – Resources which presented the actual expenditure and commitments recorded against the Local Committee’s Highways Revenue and Capital budget as at 31 December 2012. RESOLVED, that (a) the budget allocations for 2012-13 and the commitments and

expenditure recorded to date be noted; (b) the Highways Revenue budget currently projecting an

overspend of £48,979 at the end of the financial year be noted;

(c) the Corporate Director – Environment, in consultation with the

Chair and Vice-Chair be delegated authority to bring forward schemes from the approved list (minute no 64(i) of the Local Committee meeting held on 14 September 2012 refers) that would be deliverable against the £258,793 capital underspend.

116 SCHOOL CROSSING PATROL BUDGET - UPDATE REPORT The Local Committee had before it a report by the Corporate Director – Environment which updated members on the issues considered by the Highways and Transportation Working Group at its meeting on 9 November 2012. In particular the

Page 4

report advised on the progress made with regard to camera enforcement of traffic regulation orders around schools by means of the deployment of a camera car and further advised on options for use of the uncommitted funds. The Traffic Management Engineer explained to members that a company had agreed to provide a camera enforcement service free of charge and initially a trial would be carried out in the area to determine a suitable model. He informed the Committee that no penalty notices would be issued during the trial period to which a member asked whether a letter could be sent to offenders and the officer said he would investigate this option. RESOLVED, that (1) the progress being made with respect to the provision of

camera enforcement of school keep clear markings and other traffic restrictions at no cost to the County Council be noted;

(2) the progression of the schemes (appendix 1 to the report) that

can be delivered by the end of the financial year be funded from the under commitment in the School Crossing Patrol budget to the value of £47,000 be noted;

(3) a contribution of £5,000 be made to the Cumwhinton School

Parking Measures from the Wetheral Local Member Scheme allocation

(4) it be noted that the remaining £3,000 be explored through

other funding opportunities. 117 HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP (1) Minutes (Appendix 1) RESOLVED, that the minutes of the meeting of the Highways and Highways

Transportation Working Group held on 9 January 2013 be received. (2) Brampton Road Bus Stop Review (Appendix 2) RESOLVED, that the bus stop remain in its current location. (3) Pennine Way – Request for Bus Shelter (Appendix 3) RESOLVED, that the proposal not to reinstate a bus shelter at this site due to the

unavailable funding to install and maintain a shelter at this location be approved.

Page 5

(4) 160/162 Orton Road, Carlisle (Appendix 4) RESOLVED, that with removal of the words “with minor changes to the location of

the sign outside no 158 Orton Road” in the recommendation contained in the report the following be approved:-

“the objections received be over-ruled and the scheme be

implemented as detailed on drawing no 11_CH_OR_13SR_03. The scheme be funded to the value of £2,052 to be taken from the Minor Local Safety Schemes element of the Minor Highways Improvements Capital budget with a virement from the Traffic Regulation Order 2012/13 (2) of £3,000 to cover this cost.

(5) Castle Street Restricted Zone (Appendix 5) RESOLVED, that (i) Carlisle City Council be fully supported in taking forward the

introduction of the restricted parking zone to further enhance the historic part of the city centre;

(ii) the proposed scheme progress to formal consultation.

(6) Traffic Regulation Orders – Variation Order 2012/13 (Appendix 6) The local Member for Dalston and Cummersdale raised the concerns of residents regarding parking at an area near the Co-op in Dalston and the Highways Officer agreed to monitor this. RESOLVED, that (a) the following be approved:- the restriction in respect of the proposals for the B6413 Craw

Hall and Ash Lea following discussions with residents is abandoned as it does not serve the issues raised;

(b) the following restrictions proposed under The County of

Cumbria (Various Roads, Carlisle Urban and Rural Area) (Consolidation and Minor Amendment of Traffic Regulations) (Order 2001) Variation Order (No 41) 20>< be made as advertised, having taken into consideration the matters contained in section 122(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, which was specifically referred to at paragraph 7.2 of the report to the Highways and Transport Working Group on 9 January 2013:

(i) the restriction in respect of the proposals for Blackwell

Road/Toronto Street be made as advertised;

Page 6

(ii) the restriction in respect of the proposals for the B5299

Dalston (the new Co-op), that this objection be overruled and be made as advertised;

(iii) Introduce ‘No Waiting At Any Time’ restrictions on

Moatside, Greenfield Lane and Dacre Road, Brampton; (iv) formalise the “No Waiting At Any Time” restrictions

which are already “on the ground” on Cooper Way and Fletcher Way, Carlisle;

(v) extend the existing “No Waiting At Any Time”

restrictions on Port Road Business Park, Carlisle, (east and west sides), so that they cover its full length

(vi) extend the existing “No Waiting At Any Time”

restrictions on Scotland Road, Carlisle by 6.5m on the west side (outside no 75) and 7.5m on the east side (outside nos 58/60).

(7) Pavement Parking (Appendix 7) RESOLVED, that the report be noted and all four options be considered with the most

appropriate used to address the specific issue.

(8) Car Park Signage (Appendix 8) RESOLVED, that the report be noted and the Task and Finish Group set up to

consider the decluttering of the highway includes within its remit consideration of car park signing.

(9) Carlisle Parking Task Group Update (Appendix 9) RESOLVED, that (a) the report and work carried out to date be noted and account

be taken regarding concerns, in particular, Strand Road, and develop criteria before implementation of any schemes;

(b) a further report be brought to the Local Committee with

recommendations from the Carlisle Parking Task and Finish Group in due course.

(10) Petteril Valley Cycleway (Appendix 10) RESOLVED, that (a) the improvements that have already taken place as part of the

Petteril Valley Cycleway be noted;

Page 7

(b) further works be carried out as proposed within 4.3 of the

report: (i) construction of a 50 metre length of cycleway with

lighting between Warwick Road and the existing cycleway at a estimated cost of £7,800 and

(ii) provision of lighting to the existing unlit cycleway

between the small footbridge and existing lit cycleway at an estimated cost of £10,100 funded from the Section 106 contributions from the developer of the Watts Yard development.

(11) Traffic Calming in Back Lanes – Westmorland Street and Colville Street

(Appendix 11) RESOLVED, that traffic calming works by way of alterations to the footways at the

entrance points to the lanes are further developed with a more detailed design of the scheme including detailed costs provided for further consideration and inclusion into the Small Scale Improvements Capital Programme be approved.

(12) CNDR (Appendix 12) Further to the minutes of the previous meeting of the Local Committee held on 12 December 2012 (minute 95(4) refers) the local Member for Belle Vue said he had still not been invited to a Highways and Transportation Working Group to look at feedback from the impact of the CNDR and asked that this be looked into. RESOLVED, that the process with regards to the two pieces of work be noted. 118 TRAVEL STRATEGY The Corporate Director – Environment presented a report which advised members of the work taking place to prepare the Travel Strategy and in particular the local priorities that had been provided by individual local members which, once agreed, would then inform the potential direction to be taken and provide a local focus for the Strategy. The Committee were informed that consultations had taken place with parish councils and a member suggested that local employers should also be consulted. It was then suggested that the Carlisle Highways and Transportation Working Group would be in a better position to look in more detail at the Strategy. RESOLVED, that the Travel Strategy be referred to the Carlisle Highways and

Transportation Working Group.

Page 8

119 COMMUNITY GRANTS - AREAS The Local Committee had before it a report from the Chief Executive regarding the impacts of the changes to the Electoral Divisions and the geographic areas to be used for the basis of community grant allocations in the future. RESOLVED, that the new electoral divisions be used as the basis for allocating

funding based on the populations relevant to the 18 divisions. 120 NORTH FUNDING FAIR The Local Committee had before it a report by the Chief Executive which summarised information from the North Funding Fair 2012 and requested funding of £3,000 towards the costs of delivering the 2013 North Funding Fair. Members were also informed that Carlisle City Council had confirmed a funding award of £2,000 towards the 2013 event. RESOLVED, that £3,000 towards the costs of delivering the 2013 event be

agreed. 121 ELECTORAL DIVISIONS LOCAL MEMBER SCHEMES The Local Committee had before it a report from the Chief Executive which presented a number of projects to be funded from the Local Member Schemes budgets. The report included Members’ proposals that had been sufficiently investigated and developed to enable the Committee to consider spending decisions. RESOLVED, that the following revenue grants be approved:- (1) £1,750 from the Belah Division LMS budget to Groundwork’s

North East towards supply and installation of a Youth Shelter at the Belah MUGA;

(2) £6,945 from the Brampton & Gilsland Division LMS to Nether

Denton Parish Council towards the development of a play area at Low Row;

(3) £2,955 from the Currock Division LMS budget to St Margaret

Mary’s After School Club towards continued provision; (4) £6,000 from the Currock Division LMS budget towards an

environmental enhancement scheme at Lediard Avenue; (5) £6,600 from the Currock Division LMS budget towards gully

replacement in Lediard Avenue;

Page 9

(6) £5,000 from the Dalston & Cummersdale Division LMS budget towards the development of more accessible parking spaces at Thurstonfield/Rye Close;

(7) £1,000 from the Morton Division LMS budget to Newlaithes

Infant school towards the refurbishment of the school library; (8) £1,300 from the Stanwix & Irthington Division LMS budget to

supply additional hazard warning signs at Eden Golf Club; (9) £4,067 from the Yewdale Division LMS budget to Yewdale

Community Association towards the development of a wrap around care project;

(10) £3,000 from the Yewdale Division LMS budget to Yewdale

Community Association towards the delivery of health and wellbeing sessions;

(11) £3,000 from the Yewdale Division LMS budget to Carlisle City

Council’s Green Spaces Team towards improving facilities at Yewdale play area;

(12) £985 from the Yewdale Division LMS budget to Yewdale

Community Nursery towards provision for 2 year olds; (13) £23,861 from the Denton Holme LMS budget to Carlisle City

Council towards the Denton Holme Community Centre redevelopment project (£22,000 revenue and £1,861 capital).

122 0-19 SERVICES GRANTS BUDGET The Local Committee considered a report outlining recommendations from the Children and Young People Working Group on a number of grant applications to the Area 0-19 Youth Grants budget. RESOLVED, that (1) the following grants from the Area 0-19 Youth Grants budget

be approved:- (i) £1,870 to Cumbria Community Gamelan (Soundwave)

towards the launch of a new “Gong Club” music group for young people;

(ii) £400 to Scotby Pre-School Playgroup towards a

portable hand wash unit for the pre-school; (iii) £150 to Burgh by Sands Sports & Recreation

Association towards pond dipping sessions;

Page 10

(iv) £1,500 to The Rock Youth Project towards extending

youth provision; (v) £3,000 to St Cuthbert’s Without Parish Council – to

provide additional play equipment; (vi) £10,000 to Ratlingate Management Committee

(Reivers District Scouts) to develop an activity barn; (vii) £2,000 to Scout Active Support Section (Reivers

District Scouts) towards set up costs for climbing project;

(2) the 0-19 Youth Services budget be fully utilised and funding

from General Provision budget be utilised to cover any remaining grant recommendations.

123 CARLISLE AREA GRANTS FUND Members considered a report by the Chief Executive which outlined the request for grant funding from organisations. RESOLVED, that

(a) the following grants be approved:-

(1) £1,500 to Cumbria in Bloom;

(2) £1,506 to Sustainable Carlisle Ltd; (3) £500 to Matthew Salkeld towards attending the World

Transplant Games; (4) £1,459 to Carlisle Music Festival; (5) £5,000 to Morton Community Centre towards the

replacement of the conservatory; (6) £5,000 to Carlisle City Council towards the upgrading

of changing rooms and pitches at Keenan Park; (b) the funding awarded fully utilises the Area Grant budget and

then comes out of the General Provision budget.

Page 11

124 APPOINTMENT OF GOVERNORS FOR NURSERY, PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS

The Local Committee considered a schedule of recommendations for the appointment of County Council representatives on the governing bodies of county, nursery, primary and secondary schools. RESOLVED, that subject to their consent the following be appointed:- School Nomination Primary Warwick Bridge School Mr Stephen Layden Denton Mill Cottage Denton Mill Brampton CA8 2UU Houghton CE School Mr Paul Davies 18 The Green Houghton Carlisle CA3 ONF 125 CONTRACTED YOUTH PROVISION PERFORMANCE The Local Committee received a report from the Corporate Director – Children’s Services which provided information on the funding allocated during the 2nd quarter of the financial year 2012/13 and how this funding related to the youth provision being delivered within Carlisle and District through the Youth Work and Reducing Risk Taking Behaviour contract. The Committee were informed that the Youth Services and Reducing Risk Taking Behaviour Contract had been commissioned by the Authority to Inspira. The overhead costs from the contract was 7% (of which 2% was management charges). These figures were taken from the pricing schedule Inspira had submitted at tender and was approved by the Award Panel. The remaining amount was delivery costs which included the funding to sub-contracted providers. The local Member for Botcherby asked whether there was any involvement with the Botcherby Residents’ Action Group and the Carlisle Locality Officer agreed to look into this and report back to the member concerned. RESOLVED, that the report be noted and any further information be made

available to members.

Page 12

126 LOCAL AREA COMMITTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT AND SCORECARD FOR THE CARLISLE AREA: QUARTER 2, APRIL TO SEPTEMBER 2012

Members received a report from the Chief Executive which introduced the Local Area Committee Performance Scorecard. The report informed the Local Committee that in September 2011, the Council’s Cabinet approved the implementation of a refreshed Performance Management Framework (PMF) across the Council. The purpose of the performance scorecards was to systematically embed performance measurement, reporting, monitoring and management across the Council, leading to continuous performance improvement. Members welcomed the format of the revised document which had been circulated at the meeting and the Assistant Director – People Management agreed to take any comments back to his team. RESOLVED, that the report be noted. 127 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTRES (CDCS) PROGRAMME IN

CARLISLE (The Chair welcomed Carol Wilson, Centre Manager and Billy Atkinson from the Upperby Community Development Centre for this item of business). The Local Committee had before it a report by the Chief Executive on the Community Development Centres (CDCs) Programme in Carlisle. The report provided information on the roll out of investment in the Carlisle Local Committee area. Members were informed that Council had agreed in February 2011 to invest in the development of CDCs as a community resource and this totalled £150K in 2011/12 and £250K built into the base budget for subsequent years. Mr Atkinson informed members that the CDC in Upperby provided an excellent service which was very well received by people of all ages. He went on to say that they were in the process of producing publicity material for circulation more widely to advertise the facilities which were available at the Centre. Members raised their concerns about the lack of CDCs in both urban and rural areas and were informed that the existing centres provided outreach work which was available to everyone and encouraged people to promote and use this facility. RESOLVED, that (1) the report be noted; (2) a progress report be brought to the Committee in September.

Page 13

128 MONEY ADVICE CONTRACT - LOCAL PERFORMANCE REPORTING Members received a report from the Chief Executive which provided information on the delivery of the Money Advice Contract in the Carlisle area. The Contract was delivered by Citizens Advice Cumbria who relied on highly skilled trained volunteers supported by fully qualified staff. A member raised his concerns regarding the payment of TV licences in a 6 month period and asked the officer to look into this being repaid over a 12 month period. RESOLVED, that the report be noted. 129 LOCAL LEADERSHIP AND CHAIRS MEETING - 28 NOVEMBER 2012 The Local Committee received the minutes of the Local Leadership and Chairs meeting on 28 November 2012. 130 LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE - FORWARD PLAN The current Forward Plan of business for future meetings of the Local Committee was noted. The Chair thanked Tom Lawson a Reiver District Scout for his attendance at the meeting.

The meeting ended at 12.35 pm

Page 14

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Corporate Director – Resources

LOCAL COMMITTEE DEVOLVED BUDGET 2012-2013 MONITORING REPORT – COMMUNITIES BUDGET

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report presents the actual expenditure and commitments recorded against the Local Committee’s Communities Budget as at 28th February 2013.

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 The Local Committee’s 2012-13 proposed Cash Limited Budget was informed to County Council on 16th February 2012. The Local Committee is able to vire funding between budget lines during the course of the financial year, subject to Corporate Policy and Service Standards. The Committee is not able to vire money from capital budgets into revenue budgets.

2.2 The carry forwards of Local Committee balances from 2011-12 into 2012-13 were approved at 21st June 2012 County Council meeting.

2.3 The original Local Committee Revenue budget is £687,623. This is increased by carry forward balances of £433,907 and other contributions of £44,000 to give a spending limit of £1,165,530.

2.4 The Local Committee Local Member Capital Schemes budget has carry forward balances of £19,683 to be spent in the current financial year.

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 Note the budget allocations for 2012-13 and the commitments and expenditure recorded to date;

3.2 Note the unallocated resources in the Communities Revenue budgets of £136,085;

3.3 Note the fully allocated Local Member Capital Schemes budget;

Agenda Item 6a

Page 15

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 The report updates Members on the Local Committee’s Communities budgets for the 2012-13 financial year, which are summarised in Appendix A to the report.

4.2 Appendix B details the expenditure and commitments against the General Provision budget line. There is an unallocated balance of £4,737.

4.3 Appendix C details the expenditure and commitments against the Community Support and Community Grants budget line. There is an unallocated balance of £57,349.

4.4 Appendix D details the expenditure and commitments against the 0-19 Services budget line. There is an unallocated balance of £6,586.

4.5 Appendix E details the expenditure and commitments against Local Revenue Schemes. There is an unallocated balance of £67,383. The Local revenue schemes budgets can be spent over two years. The carry forward balance of £158,946 is from the 2011/12 budget so needs to be spent by the 31st March 2013. The £170,000 budget from 2012/13 can be spent up until the 31st March 2014.

4.6 Appendix F details the expenditure and commitments against Local Capital Schemes. This budget has been fully allocated.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 The Local Committee may decide to vire money between budget headings or decide not to, in line with Corporate Policy and Service Standards. The Local committee is not able to vire money from Capital Budgets into Revenue budgets.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 Local Committee could take decisions that would commit existing budgets against future expenditure.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 The recommendations in this report do not contain any legal implications; however, Local Committee could take decisions that could have future legal implications.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 The Local Committee’s Communities Revenue Budget has an unallocated balance of £136,085 as at 28th February 2013.

Page 16

8.2 The Local Committee’s Communities Capital Budget has been fully allocated as at 28th February 2013.

Tony Chew Finance Manager

8th March 2013

APPENDICES Appendices A-F: Details of 2012-13 Communities Devolved Budget. Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

No

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? No

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the

expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and necessary approvals have been obtained.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] *List here any previous relevant decisions. If none, state “No previous relevant decisions”.

Page 17

CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY If a matter has been considered by Overview and Scrutiny, this section should give details of meeting dates and any Scrutiny recommendations. If not, state “Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny”. BACKGROUND PAPERS

REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Debra Taylor Finance Officer – Resources Tel No: 01228 226575 Email: [email protected]

Page 18

Ap

pe

nd

ixA

Ap

pe

nd

ixB

ud

ge

t S

ec

tor

20

12

/13

Ba

lan

ce

Vir

em

en

tV

ire

me

nt

Re

vis

ed

Oth

er

20

12

/13

Re

ma

inin

gA

ctu

al

Pro

jec

ted

Un

all

oc

ate

dC

orp

ora

te

Ori

gin

al

B/F

wd

InO

ut

Bu

dg

et

Co

ntr

ibs

Sp

en

din

gC

om

mit

me

nts

Ex

pe

nd

itu

reO

utt

urn

Re

so

urc

es

Th

em

e

Bu

dg

et

Lim

itto

Da

teo

r

Va

ria

nc

e

££

££

££

££

££

£

Re

ve

nu

e B

ud

ge

ts:

BG

en

era

l P

rovis

ion

14

5,8

31

29

,95

80

-11

0,0

00

65

,78

90

65

,78

94

9,5

49

11

,50

36

1,0

52

4,7

37

TH

EM

E A

CC

om

mu

nity S

up

po

rt a

nd

Gra

nts

22

4,0

22

16

7,6

78

11

0,0

00

05

01

,70

04

4,0

00

54

5,7

00

15

8,4

23

32

9,9

28

48

8,3

51

57

,34

9T

HE

ME

A &

C

D0

-19

Se

rvic

es

14

7,7

70

77

,32

50

02

25

,09

50

22

5,0

95

13

,74

02

04

,76

92

18

,50

96

,58

6T

HE

ME

D

EL

oca

l R

eve

nu

e S

ch

em

es

17

0,0

00

15

8,9

46

00

32

8,9

46

03

28

,94

61

31

,49

01

30

,07

32

61

,56

36

7,3

83

TH

EM

E A

- F

RE

VE

NU

E T

OT

AL

68

7,6

23

43

3,9

07

11

0,0

00

-11

0,0

00

1,1

21

,53

04

4,0

00

1,1

65

,53

03

53

,20

36

76

,27

31

,02

9,4

75

13

6,0

55

FL

oc

al

Me

mb

er

Ca

pit

al

Sc

he

me

s0

19

,68

30

01

9,6

83

01

9,6

83

9,7

68

9,9

15

19

,68

30

TH

EM

E F

CA

PIT

AL

TO

TA

L0

19

,68

30

01

9,6

83

01

9,6

83

9,7

68

9,9

15

19

,68

30

LO

CA

L C

OM

MIT

TE

E T

OT

AL

68

7,6

23

45

3,5

90

11

0,0

00

-11

0,0

00

1,1

41

,21

34

4,0

00

1,1

85

,21

33

62

,97

16

86

,18

81

,04

9,1

58

13

6,0

55

CA

RL

ISL

E L

OC

AL

CO

MM

ITT

EE

20

12

/13

SU

MM

AR

Y F

INA

NC

IAL

ST

AT

EM

EN

T :

28

th F

eb

rua

ry 2

01

3

Page 19

APPENDIX B

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

FINANCIAL YEAR 2012/2013

FINANCIAL STATEMENT AS AT : 28-Feb-2013

BUDGET AREA : General Provision

BUDGET MANAGER : David Sheard

COST CENTRE 5945201

£ £

2012/13 Original Budget 145,831

Balances brought forward from previous years

- Earmarked 21,625

- Unallocated 8,333

29,958

Virements in:

0

Virements out:

Area Grants -10,000

Neighbourhood Forums -100,000

-110,000

2012/13 Spending Limit 65,789

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments pre 2012/13 Commitment Actual

Street lighting on A6071 to Longtown Dec-11 16,000 Note 1

Longtown multi-use games area Dec-11 3,125

Carlisle Music City Mar-12 0 5,000

Multicultural Carlisle Mar-12 0 500

Sub-total 19,125 5,500

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments 2012/13 Commitment Actual

Gelsdale Ave & Victoria Road Bus Shelters Jul-12 2,000

Kingfisher Park 20 mph Jun-12 1,500

Apprenticeship Grant Dec-12 2,279

North Funding Fair Feb-13 3,000

St Cuthberts Without Parish - provide play equipment Feb-13 0 1,003

Ratlingate Management Committee - Activity Barn Feb-13 10,000

Scout support section - Climbing Project Feb-13 2,000

Cumbria In Bloom Feb-13 1,180

Sustainable Carlisle Ltd Feb-13 1,506

Matthew Salkeld - World Transplant Games Feb-13 500

Carlisle Music festival Feb-13 1,459

Morton Community Centre - Conservatory Feb-13 0 5,000

Carlisle City Council - Keenan park upgrade Feb-13 5,000

Sub-total 30,424 6,003

Totals 49,549 11,503

Total Actual and Committed 61,052

Unallocated Resources: 4,737

Note 1: £16,000 allocated to Street Lighting on A6071 Longtown on understanding further £5,000 is secured for scheme

Page 20

Ap

pen

dix

C

Ap

pen

dix

Bu

dg

et

Secto

r2012/1

3B

ala

nce

Vir

em

en

tV

irem

en

tR

evis

ed

Oth

er

2012/1

3R

em

ain

ing

Actu

al

Pro

jecte

dU

nallo

cate

dC

orp

ora

te

Ori

gin

al

B/F

wd

InO

ut

Bu

dg

et

Co

ntr

ibs

Sp

en

din

gC

om

mit

men

tsE

xp

en

dit

ure

Ou

ttu

rnR

eso

urc

es

Th

em

e

Bu

dg

et

Lim

itto

Date

or

Vari

an

ce

££

££

££

££

££

£

Reven

ue B

ud

gets

:

Neig

hbourh

ood D

evelo

pm

ent T

eam

129,7

72

0

0

129,7

72

129,7

72

10,8

14

118,9

58

129,7

72

0

TH

EM

E A

C(1

)F

oru

ms

0

88,8

19

100,0

00

0

188,8

19

44,0

00

232,8

19

53,0

53

122,4

17

175,4

70

57,3

49

TH

EM

E B

-F

C(2

)S

chool C

rossin

g P

atr

ols

40,3

60

48,1

21

0

0

88,4

81

88,4

81

72,4

15

16,0

66

88,4

81

0

TH

EM

E D

Money A

dvic

e C

ontr

act -

CA

B53,8

90

0

53,8

90

53,8

90

0

53,8

90

53,8

90

0

TH

EM

E B

C(3

)D

ebt R

ecovery

& M

oney A

dvic

e (

DR

AM

A)

0

6,7

94

0

0

6,7

94

6,7

94

0

6,7

94

6,7

94

0

TH

EM

E B

C(4

)A

rea P

roje

cts

0

21,8

21

0

0

21,8

21

21,8

21

21,8

21

0

21,8

21

0

TH

EM

E B

C(5

)A

rea G

rants

0

2,1

23

10,0

00

0

12,1

23

12,1

23

320

11,8

03

12,1

23

0

TH

EM

E B

TO

TA

L224,0

22

167,6

78

110,0

00

0

501,7

00

44,0

00

545,7

00

158,4

23

329,9

28

488,3

51

57,3

49

CA

RL

ISL

E L

OC

AL

CO

MM

ITT

EE

2012/1

3

SU

MM

AR

Y C

OM

MU

NIT

Y S

UP

PO

RT

AN

D C

OM

MU

NIT

Y G

RA

NT

S :

2

8T

H F

EB

RU

AR

Y 2

013

Page 21

APPENDIX C(1)

£ £

Original Budget 2012/13 0

Balances brought forward from previous years

- Earmarked 23,839

- Unallocated 64,980

88,819

City Council Allocation 44,000

General Provisions 100,000

Virements In 0

100,000

Virements Out

0

2011/12 Spending Limit for Forums 232,819

BUDGET AREA : FORUMS

DATE: 28-Feb-13

COST CENTRE 5940301

BUDGET MANAGER : David Sheard

City &

Forum Area County Commited Un - Virement 2012/13 Earmarked Grants Unallocated

Council B/Fwd Allocated In Spending Grants Paid to Balances

Cost based on B/Fwd

Centre Population

£ £ £ £ £ £ £ £

Belah W00000029 8,131 2,362 5,806 16,299 6,200 6,138 3,961

Belle Vue W00000030 7,813 650 4,751 13,214 3,150 1,968 8,096

Botcherby W00000031 8,312 1,171 9,483 5,203 4,280 0

Brampton and District W00000032 9,023 4,244 13,267 750 6,919 5,598

Castle W00000033 7,877 5,239 13,116 1,000 10,905 1,211

Currock W00000034 8,373 5,559 13,932 0 9,800 4,132

Dalston and Cummersdale W00000035 10,814 4,164 14,978 3,350 11,307 321

Denton Holme W00000036 8,301 4,090 12,391 1,020 3,250 8,121

Harraby W00000037 8,309 4,487 42 12,838 1,208 5,926 5,704

Longtown and Bewcastle W00000038 8,977 909 9,886 1,230 5,200 3,456

Morton W00000039 8,007 2,050 2,260 12,317 2,200 7,350 2,767

St Aidans W00000040 7,889 5,252 456 13,597 1,486 12,335 -224

Stanwix and Irthington W00000041 9,254 8,997 18,251 0 8,736 9,515

Stanwix W00000042 8,031 7,742 15,773 7,387 8,386 0

Upperby W00000043 7,505 200 3,492 11,197 693 5,815 4,689

Wetheral W00000044 9,149 5,796 14,945 12,195 2,750 0

Yewdale W00000045 8,233 1,096 8,004 17,333 5,981 11,352 0

Total Grant payments 144,000 23,839 64,980 0 232,819 53,053 122,417 57,347

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

FINANCIAL YEAR 2011/12

Page 22

APPENDIX C(2)

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

FINANCIAL YEAR 2012/2013

FINANCIAL STATEMENT AS AT : 28-Feb-2013

BUDGET AREA : School Crossing Patrols

BUDGET MANAGER : David Sheard

COST CENTRE 2410201

£ £

2012/13 Original Budget 40,360

Balances brought forward from previous years

- Earmarked 47,261

- Unallocated 860

48,121

Virements in:

General Provisions

0

Virements out:

0

2012/13 Spending Limit 88,481

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments pre 2012/13 Commitments ActualSchool Crossing Patrol Wig Wag Signs Feb-08 0 Note 2

Signage for Edgehill Road September-08 0 Note 2

Signage for Arnside Road September-08 0 Note 2

SCP Signs - Warwick Bridge March-10 0 Note 2

Cumwhinton School - Flashing Lights March-10 0 Note 2

School Safety Zone measures - Inglewood School December-10 0 Note 2

Traffice Restriction Orders at Schools December-10 0

School road safety upgrades February-11 14,620

Pennine Way warning signage upgrade February-11 1,080

Better Ways to Schools proposals February-11 2,282

SLA with Client Services 2010/11 0 Note 2

SLA with Client Services 2011/12 March-11 0 Note 2

Pass Plus+ Sep-11 5,000

Sub-total 22,982 0

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments 2012/13 Commitments ActualSLA with Client Services - reducing balance March-12 24,294

April 1,123

May 1,888

June 1,985

July 1,230

Sept 2,027

Oct 2,247

Nov 2,231

Dec 1,515

Jan 1,819

Feb

March

SLA Year end Estimate -20,362

Amount available for Schemes 45,501

Sub-total 49,433 16,066

Totals 72,415 16,066

Total Actual and Committed 88,481

Unallocated Resources: 0 Note 1

Notes:

Note 1: Any surplus can only be used for SCP or Road Related Safety (as per Cabinet Paper 3rd March 2011)

Note 2: These schemes have been completed and remaining allocations decommitted in July 2012 meeting.

Page 23

APPENDIX C(3)

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

FINANCIAL YEAR 2012/2013

FINANCIAL STATEMENT AS AT : 28-Feb-2013

BUDGET AREA : Debt Recovery & Money Advice (DRAMA)

BUDGET MANAGER : David Sheard

COST CENTRE 5941501

£ £

2012/13 Original Budget 0

Balances brought forward from previous years

- Earmarked 0

- Unallocated 6,794

6,794

Virements in: 0

0

Virements out: 0

0

2012/13 Spending Limit 6,794

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments pre 2012/13 Commitments Actual

Sub-total 0 0

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments 2012/13 Commitments Actual

Credit Union Support December-12 0 6,794

Sub-total 0 6,794

Totals 0 6,794

Total Actual and Committed 6,794

Unallocated Resources: 0

`

Page 24

APPENDIX C(4)

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

FINANCIAL YEAR 2012/2013

FINANCIAL STATEMENT AS AT : 28-Feb-2013

BUDGET AREA : Area Projects

BUDGET MANAGER : David Sheard

COST CENTRE 5942501

£ £

2012/13 Original Budget 0

Balances brought forward from previous years

- Earmarked 21,821

- Unallocated

21,821

Virements in:

0

0

Virements out:

0

2012/13 Spending Limit 21,821

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments pre 2012/13 Commitments Actual

Harrbay Project Feb-09 0 Note 1

Advanced Works for Capital Schemes Sep-09 0 Note 1

Creditors SLA Mar-10 0 Note 1

Citadel Lighting Oct-10 200

Carlisle Alleygates 0 Note 1

York Fields Jan-10 3,900

Sub-total 4,100 0

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments 2012/13 Commitments Actual

Apprenticeship Grant Dec-12 17,721

Sub-total 17,721 0

Totals 21,821 0

Total Actual and Committed 21,821

Unallocated Resources: 0

Notes:

Page 25

APPENDIX C(4

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

FINANCIAL YEAR 2012/2013

FINANCIAL STATEMENT AS AT : 28-Feb-2013

BUDGET AREA : Area Grants

BUDGET MANAGER : David Sheard

COST CENTRE 5942601

£ £

2012/13 Original Budget 0

Balances brought forward from previous years

- Earmarked 2,123

- Unallocated

2,123

Virements in:

General Provisions March-12 10,000

10,000

Virements out:

0

2012/13 Spending Limit 12,123

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments pre 2012/13 Commitments Actual

Cumbria Army Cadet Force Jul-11 0 1,500

Quondam Arts Trust Mar-12 0 623

Sub-total 0 2,123

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments 2012/13 Commitments Actual

Carlisle Border Reviers American Football Club 0 635

Uma Buddhist Centre Jun-12 0 500

Carlisle Cricket Club - Security System Jul-12 0 1,900

Carlisle MENCAP - Sensory Equipment Jul-12 0 995

Herdwick Fencing Club Sep-12 0 1,000

Cumbria Veterans Badminton Association Sep-12 0 250

Cumbria Pride Sep-12 0 1,000

Trinity Area Community Trust Community Choir Oct-12 0 2,500

Carlisle and District Rambling Club Oct-12 0 500

Carlisle Green Room - new sound system Oct-12 0 400

Cumbria In Bloom Feb-13 320

Sub-total 320 9,680

Totals 320 11,803

Total Actual and Committed 12,123

Unallocated Resources: 0

Page 26

Ap

pe

nd

ix D

Ap

pe

nd

ixB

ud

ge

t S

ec

tor

20

12

/13

Ba

lan

ce

Vir

em

en

tV

ire

me

nt

Re

vis

ed

Oth

er

20

12

/13

Re

ma

inin

gA

ctu

al

Pro

jec

ted

Un

all

oc

ate

dC

orp

ora

te

Ori

gin

al

B/F

wd

InO

ut

Bu

dg

et

Co

ntr

ibs

Sp

en

din

gC

om

mit

me

nts

Ex

pe

nd

itu

reO

utt

urn

Re

so

urc

es

Th

em

e

Bu

dg

et

Lim

itto

Da

teo

r

Va

ria

nc

e

££

££

££

££

££

£

Re

ve

nu

e B

ud

ge

ts:

D(1

)0

-19

Se

rvic

es

14

7,7

70

30

,11

10

01

77

,88

11

77

,88

17

,67

41

70

,20

71

77

,88

10

TH

EM

E D

D(2

)0

-19

Lo

ca

l D

evo

lve

d S

erv

ice

s

04

7,2

14

00

47

,21

44

7,2

14

6,0

66

34

,56

24

0,6

28

6,5

86

TH

EM

E D

TO

TA

L1

47

,77

07

7,3

25

00

22

5,0

95

02

25

,09

51

3,7

40

20

4,7

69

21

8,5

09

6,5

86

CA

RL

ISL

E L

OC

AL

CO

MM

ITT

EE

20

12

/13

SU

MM

AR

Y 0

-19

SE

RV

ICE

S :

28

TH

FE

BR

UA

RY

20

13

Page 27

APPENDIX D(1)

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

FINANCIAL YEAR 2012/2013

FINANCIAL STATEMENT AS AT : 28-Feb-2013

BUDGET AREA : 0-19 Services

BUDGET MANAGER : David Sheard

COST CENTRE 1713301

£ £

2012/13 Original Budget 147,770

Balances brought forward from previous years

- Earmarked 30,111

- Unallocated

30,111

Virements in:

0

0

Virements out:

0

2012/13 Spending Limit 177,881

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments pre 2012/13 Commitments Actual

Carlisle Youth Council Sep-11 0 500

Longtown multi-use games area Dec-11 3,125

Carlisle Youth Council Jan-12 0 3,935

Carlisle & District Federation of Community Orgs Mar-12 0 12,000

Safety Net Advice and Support Centre Mar-12 -1 5,596

St Cuthbert Without Parish Council Play Area Mar-12 0 1,500

Cumbria Federation of Young Farmers Northern Dist Mar-12 0 3,456

Sub-total 3,124 26,987

Remaining

Expenditure and Commitments 2012/13 Commitments Actual

Cumbria Federation of Young Farmers Northern Dist Mar-12 0 144

Carlisle Mencap - Grace Little Centre Mar-12 0 21,598

Friends Of Rockcliffe - Sports Coaching May-12 0 3,720

Carlisle College Jun-12 0 5,000

Cumwhitton Parish Community Partnership Jun-12 0 7,000

St Bedes RC Primary School Jun-12 0 3,760

Friends of Newtown Community Primary Jun-12 0 2,500

Football 4 All Disability Group Jun-12 0 500

Cumbria Scouts Jun-12 0 1,000

Carlisle Able to Play Schemes Jun-12 0 7,000

Brampton Parish Council Jun-12 0 3,000

Cumwhinton After School Club Jun-12 0 500

Wetheral Parish Council Jun-12 0 2,000

Bewcastle Parish Council Jun-12 0 1,000

Beaumonth Parish Council Jun-12 0 1,956

Stanwix Rural Parish Council Jun-12 0 1,500

Carlisle & Eden Children in care Council Jul-12 0 5,000

Trinity school - Uganda Project Jul-12 0 1,200

Carlisle Festival - Classical Music Challenge Jul-12 0 700

Petteril Bank Community Centre Jul-12 0 15,000

Friends of Acredale - Park Equipment Jul-12 0 1,500

Botcherby Community Association - Play Scheme Jul-12 0 1,350

Harraby Cathloic Club FC - Strips Jul-12 0 300

Currock House Community Centre - Play scheme Jul-12 0 900

Brampton Parish Council - Activity day Jul-12 0 1,000

East Cumbria Family Support Association Jul-12 0 5,000

The Rock - Currock Youth Project Sep-12 0 1,500

Denton Holme Community Centre Sep-12 0 1,500

Living Well Trust - Wacki Wednesday Sep-12 0 200

Living Well Trust - Summer Holiday Club Sep-12 0 275

St Cuthberts Community School - "UCanShine" Sep-12 0 4,000

Cumbria Army Cadet Force - Currock Detachment Sep-12 0 750

Stanwix Rural Parish Council - Play area Sep-12 0 2,000

Carlisle Community Centre's Federation Sep-12 0 2,000

Dalston Recreation Association - Play Equipment Sep-12 0 5,000

Talking Tarn Amateur Rowing Club - Get Kids Rowing Sep-12 0 5,000

Cumwhinton After School Club Sep-12 0 1,000

Vistula Polish Association Sep-12 0 2,000

Cumbria Pride Sep-12 0 500

Carlisle City Football Club - junior football section Sep-12 0 3,000

St Michaels Pre School Nursery Oct-12 0 500

Botcherby Residents Action Group Oct-12 2,000

Richard Rose Academy - Nepal Trek Oct-12 0 2,000

Celebrating Youth - Grants for the Arts Dec-12 2,000

13th Trinity Scout Group Dec-12 0 2,500

Burgh by Sands - New Playground Dec-12 0 3,000

Border City Wheelers - Young Cyclists Dec-12 0 2,000

Petteril Bank Community Centre Dec-12 0 1,000

Dalston Junior Black Reds FC Dec-12 0 2,000

1st Elisabeth Baden Powell Scout Group Dec-12 0 2,000

Cumbria Community Gamelan (Soundwave) Feb-13 0 1,870

Scotby Pre-School Playgroup Feb-13 400

Burgh By sands Sports & recreation Association Feb-13 150

Rock Youth Project Feb-13 0 1,500

St Cuthberts Without Parish - provide play equipment Feb-13 0 1,997

Sub-total 4,550 143,220

Totals 7,674 170,207

Total Actual and Committed 177,881

Unallocated Resources: 0

Notes:

Note 1: 0-19 services budget was over allocated by £21,742 in 2011/12. Have moved £144 of the £3600

commitment for Cumbria federation of Young Farmers in the 2012/13 commitments and

£21,598 for carlisle Mencap into 2012/13 commitments.

Page 28

CA

RL

ISL

E L

OC

AL

CO

MM

ITT

EE

AP

PE

ND

IX D

(2)

FIN

AN

CIA

L Y

EA

R 2

01

2/1

3

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TA

TE

ME

NT

AS

AT

28

-Fe

b-2

01

3

BU

DG

ET

AR

EA

:0

-19

De

vo

lve

d S

erv

ice

s

BU

DG

ET

MA

NA

GE

R:

Da

vid

Sh

ea

rd

CO

ST

CE

NT

RE

59

43

20

1

All

oca

tio

n 2

01

2/1

30

Vir

emen

t in

fro

m 0

-19 S

ervic

es0

Ava

ila

ble

base

bu

dget

0

Un

all

oca

ted

Bala

nce

b/f

fro

m 2

011/1

23

4,4

20

Earm

ark

ed G

ran

ts b

/f f

rom

20

11/1

21

2,7

94

Tota

l B

ud

get

ava

ilab

le t

o F

oru

ms

47,2

14

Fo

rum

Are

aC

os

t2

01

2-1

32

01

1-1

22

01

1-1

2V

ire

me

nts

Vir

em

en

ts2

01

2-1

3G

ran

ts2

01

2-1

3U

na

llo

ca

ted

Ce

ntr

eA

llo

ca

tio

nB

/Fw

d

Ea

rma

rke

din

ou

tS

pe

nd

ing

Pa

id t

oE

arm

ark

ed

Re

so

urc

es

fro

m

b/f

Lim

itD

ate

Gra

nts

££

££

££

££

Be

lah

W0

00

00

02

90

3,2

42

98

84

,23

09

88

03

,24

2

Be

lle V

ue

W0

00

00

03

00

-16

1

2,7

80

2,6

19

2,5

00

01

19

Bo

tch

erb

yW

00

00

00

31

01

56

15

60

15

60

Bra

mp

ton

an

d D

istr

ict

W0

00

00

03

20

5,2

73

5,2

73

4,9

44

03

29

Ca

stle

W0

00

00

03

30

1,1

04

1,1

04

1,1

04

00

Cu

rro

ck

W0

00

00

03

40

4,5

84

4,5

84

4,5

84

00

Da

lsto

n a

nd

Cu

mm

ers

da

leW

00

00

00

35

04

,74

45

00

5,2

44

3,2

44

2,0

00

0

De

nto

n H

olm

eW

00

00

00

36

02

,07

11

16

2,1

87

00

2,1

87

Ha

rra

by

W0

00

00

03

70

4,3

39

4,3

39

4,1

16

22

30

Lo

ng

tow

n a

nd

Be

wca

stle

W0

00

00

03

80

2,7

50

12

42

,87

41

,90

08

50

12

4

Mo

rto

nW

00

00

00

39

03

,26

72

00

3,4

67

3,4

29

03

8

St

Aid

an

sW

00

00

00

40

01

,61

81

,61

81

,61

80

0

Sta

nw

ix a

nd

Irt

hin

gto

nW

00

00

00

41

02

,81

42

,81

41

,00

01

,81

40

Sta

nw

ixW

00

00

00

42

07

21

72

12

50

47

10

Up

pe

rby

W0

00

00

04

30

62

37

00

1,3

23

70

00

62

3

We

the

ral

W0

00

00

04

40

42

24

22

50

00

-78

Ye

wd

ale

W0

00

00

04

50

3,6

85

55

24

,23

73

,68

55

52

0

To

tal

for

Are

a0

34

,41

81

2,7

94

00

47

,21

23

4,5

62

6,0

66

6,5

84

Page 29

AP

PE

ND

IX E

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TA

TE

ME

NT

AS

AT

:2

8-F

eb

-20

13

BU

DG

ET

MA

NA

GE

R :

David

Sheard

CO

ST

CE

NT

RE

5949601

Pro

ject

Bu

dg

et

Secto

r2012/1

3B

ala

nce

Vir

em

en

tV

irem

en

tR

evis

ed

Oth

er

2012/1

3R

em

ain

ing

Actu

al

Actu

al

Un

allo

cate

d

Co

de

Ori

gin

al

B/F

wd

InO

ut

Bu

dg

et

Co

ntr

ibs

Sp

en

din

gC

om

mit

men

tsE

xp

en

dit

ure

& C

om

mit

ted

/R

eso

urc

es

Bu

dg

et

Lim

itto

Date

Pro

jecte

do

r

Ou

ttu

rnV

ari

an

ce

££

££

££

££

££

£

Reven

ue B

ud

gets

:

RV

1000137

BE

LA

H

10,0

00

11,0

00

21,0

00

21,0

00

6,4

50

14,5

11

20,9

61

39

RV

1000138

BE

LLE

VU

E

10,0

00

12,0

00

22,0

00

22,0

00

101

10,4

46

10,5

47

11,4

53

RV

1000139

BO

TC

HE

RB

Y

10,0

00

8,4

00

18,4

00

18,4

00

18,3

23

77

18,4

00

0

RV

1000140

BR

AM

PT

ON

GIL

SLA

ND

10,0

00

2,5

00

12,5

00

12,5

00

6,9

45

5,5

55

12,5

00

0

RV

1000141

CA

ST

LE

10,0

00

10,8

00

20,8

00

20,8

00

1,5

54

4,3

70

5,9

24

14,8

76

RV

1000142

CU

RR

OC

K

10,0

00

11,0

00

21,0

00

21,0

00

15,5

55

1,0

00

16,5

55

4,4

45

RV

1000143

DA

LS

TO

N C

UM

ME

RS

DA

LE

10,0

00

10,2

10

20,2

10

20,2

10

6,1

27

13,0

98

19,2

25

985

RV

1000144

DE

NT

ON

HO

LM

E

10,0

00

12,0

00

22,0

00

22,0

00

22,0

00

22,0

00

0

RV

1000145

HA

RR

AB

Y

10,0

00

10,5

00

20,5

00

20,5

00

20,4

82

-145

20,3

37

163

RV

1000146

LO

NG

TO

WN

BE

WC

AS

TLE

10,0

00

7,6

70

17,6

70

17,6

70

2,5

50

4,3

39

6,8

89

10,7

81

RV

1000147

MO

RT

ON

10,0

00

12,0

00

22,0

00

22,0

00

1,0

00

11,5

00

12,5

00

9,5

00

RV

1000148

ST

AID

AN

S

10,0

00

010,0

00

10,0

00

4,3

64

5,6

36

10,0

00

0

RV

1000149

ST

AN

WIX

IR

TH

ING

TO

N

10,0

00

11,3

66

21,3

66

21,3

66

2,9

00

10,8

25

13,7

25

7,6

41

RV

1000150

ST

AN

WIX

UR

BA

N

10,0

00

10,0

00

20,0

00

20,0

00

87

19,9

13

20,0

00

0

RV

1000151

UP

PE

RB

Y

10,0

00

11,0

00

21,0

00

21,0

00

7,0

00

6,5

00

13,5

00

7,5

00

RV

1000152

WE

TH

ER

AL

10,0

00

8,5

00

18,5

00

18,5

00

5,0

00

13,5

00

18,5

00

0

RV

1000153

YE

WD

ALE

10,0

00

10,0

00

20,0

00

20,0

00

11,0

52

8,9

48

20,0

00

0

TO

TA

L170,0

00

158,9

46

00

328,9

46

0328,9

46

131,4

90

130,0

73

261,5

63

67,3

83

CA

RL

ISL

E L

OC

AL

CO

MM

ITT

EE

2012/1

3

EL

EC

TO

RA

L D

IVIS

ION

LO

CA

L R

EV

EN

UE

SC

HE

ME

S

Page 30

AP

PE

ND

IX F

FIN

AN

CIA

L S

TA

TE

ME

NT

AS

AT

:2

8-F

eb

-20

13

BU

DG

ET

MA

NA

GE

R :

David

Sheard

CO

ST

CE

NT

RE

5945290

Pro

ject

Bu

dg

et

Secto

r2012/1

3B

ala

nce

Vir

em

en

tV

irem

en

tR

evis

ed

Oth

er

2012/1

3R

em

ain

ing

Actu

al

Actu

al

Un

allo

cate

d

Co

de

Ori

gin

al

B/F

wd

InO

ut

Bu

dg

et

Co

ntr

ibs

Sp

en

din

gC

om

mit

men

tsE

xp

en

dit

ure

& C

om

mit

ted

/R

eso

urc

es

Bu

dg

et

Lim

itto

Date

Pro

jecte

do

r

Ou

ttu

rnV

ari

an

ce

££

££

££

££

££

£

Cap

ital B

ud

gets

:

CE

1000137

BE

LA

H

06,5

90

6,5

90

6,5

90

06,5

90

6,5

90

00

CE

1000138

BE

LLE

VU

E

00

00

00

00

0

CE

1000139

BO

TC

HE

RB

Y

03,8

89

3,8

89

3,8

89

3,8

89

03,8

89

00

CE

1000140

BR

AM

PT

ON

GIL

SLA

ND

0

00

00

00

00

CE

1000141

CA

ST

LE

0

50

50

50

050

50

00

CE

1000142

CU

RR

OC

K

00

00

00

00

0

CE

1000143

DA

LS

TO

N C

UM

ME

RS

DA

LE

0

402

402

402

402

0402

00

CE

1000144

DE

NT

ON

HO

LM

E

05,4

77

5,4

77

5,4

77

5,4

77

05,4

77

00

CE

1000145

HA

RR

AB

Y

0145

145

145

0145

145

00

CE

1000146

LO

NG

TO

WN

BE

WC

AS

TLE

0

615

615

615

0615

615

00

CE

1000147

MO

RT

ON

0

00

00

00

00

CE

1000148

ST

AID

AN

S

00

00

00

00

0

CE

1000149

ST

AN

WIX

IR

TH

ING

TO

N

01,1

89

1,1

89

1,1

89

01,1

89

1,1

89

00

CE

1000150

ST

AN

WIX

UR

BA

N

00

00

00

00

0

CE

1000151

UP

PE

RB

Y

01,3

26

1,3

26

1,3

26

01,3

26

1,3

26

00

CE

1000152

WE

TH

ER

AL

00

00

00

00

0

CE

1000153

YE

WD

ALE

0

00

00

00

00

TO

TA

L0

19,6

83

00

19,6

83

019,6

83

9,7

68

9,9

15

19,6

83

00

0

Co

rpo

rate

Th

em

e

TH

EM

E A

- IM

PR

OV

ING

CO

UN

CIL

SE

RV

ICE

S

TH

EM

E B

- E

NH

AN

CIN

G E

CO

NO

MIC

WE

LLB

EIN

G

TH

EM

E C

- IM

PR

OV

ING

QU

ALIT

Y O

F L

IFE

OF

VU

LN

ER

AB

LE

AD

ULT

S

TH

EM

E D

- W

ELLB

EIN

G O

F C

HIL

DR

EN

AN

D Y

OU

NG

PE

OP

LE

TH

EM

E E

- IM

PR

OV

ING

SA

FE

TY

OF

PE

OP

LE

S' L

IVE

S

TH

EM

E F

- P

RO

TE

CT

ING

& E

NH

AN

CIN

G E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

T

CA

RL

ISL

E L

OC

AL

CO

MM

ITT

EE

2012/1

3

EL

EC

TO

RA

L D

IVIS

ION

LO

CA

L C

AP

ITA

L S

CH

EM

ES

Page 31

Page 32

This page is intentionally left blank

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Corporate Director – Resources

LOCAL COMMITTEE DEVOLVED BUDGET 2012-2013 MONITORING REPORT – HIGHWAYS BUDGET

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report presents the actual expenditure and commitments recorded against the Local Committee’s Highways Revenue and Capital Budgets as at 28th February 2012.

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 The Local Committee’s 2012-13 proposed Cash Limited Budget was informed to County Council on the 16th February 2012. The Local Committee is able to vire funding between budget lines during the course of the financial year, subject to Corporate Policy and Service Standards. The Committee is not able to vire money from capital budgets into revenue budgets.

2.2 The carry forwards of Local Committee balances from 2011-12 into 2012-13 were approved at 21st June 2012 County Council meeting.

2.3 The original Highways revenue budget is £2,532,788. This is decreased by carry forward balances of £15,216 to give a spending limit of £2,517,572.

2.4 The original Highways Capital Budget is £2,860,000. This is increased by carry forwards of £395,030 to give a spending limit of £3,255,030.

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 Note the budget allocations for 2012-13 and the commitments and expenditure recorded to date;

3.2 Note the Highways Revenue budget is currently projecting an overspend of £56,587 at the end of the financial year;

Agenda Item 6b

Page 33

3.3 Note the Highways Capital budget is currently projecting an underspend of £26,394 at the end of the financial year;

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 The Highways Revenue budget is showing a projected overspend at this stage of the financial year of £56,587. This is mainly the carry forwards from 2011/12. The Area Highways and Transport Manager is looking into ways of reducing this overspend, and in particular the requirements for the Better Highways and Street Lighting budget lines. However, it appears unlikely that the overspend will reduce by any great amounts at this stage of the financial year due to the pressures that have been put on the budget lately.

4.2 The Highways Capital Budget is showing a projected underspend at this stage of the financial year of £26,394.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.0 The Local Committee may decide to vire money between budget headings or decide not to. Noting that the Local Committee is not able to vire money from Capital Budgets into revenue budgets.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.0 The recommendations in this report do not contain any specific financial implications. Local Committee could take decisions that would commit existing budgets against future expenditure.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.0 The recommendations in this report do not contain any legal implications; however, Local Committee could take decisions that could have future legal implications.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.0 The Highways revenue budget is showing a projected overspend for the financial year of £56,587. The Highways Capital budget is showing a projected underspend for the financial year of £26,394 which is mainly due to the credit balances from 2011/12.

Tony Chew Finance Manager 8th March 2013

Page 34

APPENDICES Appendix A(2) Summary of Carlisle Local Committee Highways Budget 2012-13 Appendices G-H Detail of Individual Highways and Capital Budgets Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

No

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? No

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the

expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and necessary approvals have been obtained.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] No previous relevant decisions. CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY If a matter has been considered by Overview and Scrutiny, this section should give details of meeting dates and any Scrutiny recommendations. If not, state “Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny”. BACKGROUND PAPERS None. REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Debra Taylor Finance Officer – Resources Tel No: 01228 226575 Email: [email protected]

Page 35

Page 36

This page is intentionally left blank

CA

RL

ISL

E L

OC

AL

CO

MM

ITT

EE

AP

PE

ND

IX A

(2)

20

12

-13

SU

MM

AR

Y F

INA

NC

IAL

ST

AT

EM

EN

T

Ap

pe

nd

ixB

ud

ge

t S

ec

tor

20

12

/13

Bro

ug

ht

Vir

em

en

tsV

ire

me

nts

Re

vis

ed

Oth

er

Sp

en

din

g

Co

mm

ite

dA

ctu

al

Co

mm

ite

dE

sti

ma

ted

Un

all

oc

ate

d

Ori

gin

al

Fo

rwa

rdIn

Ou

tB

ud

ge

tC

on

trib

sL

imit

no

t p

aid

Pa

ida

nd

Ac

tua

lO

utt

urn

or

Bu

dg

et

To

Da

teto

da

teV

ari

an

ce

££

££

££

££

££

££

GH

igh

wa

ys M

ain

ten

an

ce

- R

eve

nu

e2

,53

2,7

88

-15

,21

60

02

,51

7,5

72

02

,51

7,5

72

17

2,0

73

1,8

43

,81

32

,01

5,8

86

2,5

74

,15

9-5

6,5

87

To

tal

Hig

hw

ay

s R

ev

en

ue

Bu

dg

et

2,5

32

,78

8-1

5,2

16

00

2,5

17

,57

20

2,5

17

,57

21

72

,07

31

,84

3,8

13

2,0

15

,88

62

,57

4,1

59

-56

,58

7

HH

igh

wa

ys a

nd

Fo

otw

ays S

ch

em

es

1,5

29

,93

83

46

,47

52

45

,63

7-6

32

,47

51

,48

9,5

75

01

,48

9,5

75

56

9,3

74

91

0,2

59

1,4

79

,63

31

,28

1,6

97

20

7,8

78

HM

ino

r S

tru

ctu

ral M

ain

ten

an

ce

98

1,7

15

03

45

,15

00

1,3

26

,86

50

1,3

26

,86

53

18

,46

41

,00

0,4

96

1,3

18

,96

01

,55

0,0

47

-22

3,1

82

HL

igh

tin

g a

nd

Tra

ffic

Sig

na

ls2

23

,34

70

42

,75

20

26

6,0

99

02

66

,09

92

17

,48

41

6,3

73

23

3,8

57

23

8,5

88

27

,51

1

HH

igh

wa

ys I

mp

rove

me

nts

12

5,0

00

48

,55

55

0,4

91

-51

,55

51

72

,49

10

17

2,4

91

33

,93

78

3,5

42

11

7,4

79

15

8,3

04

14

,18

7

To

tal

Hig

hw

ay

s C

ap

ita

l A

llo

ca

tio

n2

,86

0,0

00

39

5,0

30

68

4,0

30

-68

4,0

30

3,2

55

,03

00

3,2

55

,03

01

,13

9,2

59

2,0

10

,67

03

,14

9,9

29

3,2

28

,63

62

6,3

94

Hig

hw

ay

s T

ota

l R

es

ou

rce

s5

,39

2,7

88

37

9,8

14

68

4,0

30

-68

4,0

30

5,7

72

,60

20

5,7

72

,60

21

,31

1,3

32

3,8

54

,48

35

,16

5,8

15

5,8

02

,79

5-3

0,1

93

HIG

HW

AY

S B

UD

GE

TS

at

28

TH

FE

BR

UA

RY

20

13

Page 37

AP

PE

ND

IX G

Hig

hw

ay

s R

ev

en

ue

20

12

/13

Bu

dg

et

De

sc

rip

tio

nA

pp

rov

ed

Bu

dg

et

Bro

ug

ht

Fo

rwa

rdV

ire

me

nts

In

Vir

em

en

ts

Ou

t

Re

vis

ed

Bu

dg

et

Oth

er

Co

ntr

ibs

Sp

en

din

g L

imit

Co

mm

itte

dP

ay

me

nts

Co

mm

itte

d a

nd

Pa

id

Es

tim

ate

d

Ou

ttu

rn

Un

all

oc

ate

d

Ba

lan

ce

s

Po

sit

ion

as

at:

28

th F

eb

rua

ry 2

01

££

££

££

££

££

£

Ba

sic

Ma

inte

na

nc

e

Cu

mb

ria

Hig

hw

ays

90

7,1

88

0

0

0

9

07

,18

8

0

90

7,1

88

1

38

,43

4

78

8,5

39

9

26

,97

3

91

2,7

37

(5

,54

9)

City C

laim

ed

Rig

hts

58

6,0

00

0

0

0

5

86

,00

0

0

58

6,0

00

0

3

70

,05

6

37

0,0

56

5

86

,00

0

0

To

tal

Ba

sic

Ma

inte

na

nc

e1

,49

3,1

88

0

0

0

1

,49

3,1

88

0

1

,49

3,1

88

1

38

,43

4

1,1

58

,59

5

1,2

97

,02

9

1,4

98

,73

7

(5,5

49

)

Ro

ad

Lig

hti

ng

Ca

rlis

le in

cls

En

erg

y a

nd

Sig

na

ls7

50

,00

0

0

0

0

75

0,0

00

0

7

50

,00

0

33

,63

9

51

3,3

17

5

46

,95

6

73

3,0

00

1

7,0

00

City C

laim

ed

Rig

hts

16

0,0

00

0

0

0

1

60

,00

0

0

16

0,0

00

0

8

8,4

39

8

8,4

39

1

60

,00

0

0

To

tal

Ro

ad

Lig

hti

ng

91

0,0

00

0

0

0

9

10

,00

0

0

91

0,0

00

3

3,6

39

6

01

,75

6

63

5,3

95

8

93

,00

0

17

,00

0

Ca

rlis

le1

5,0

00

(6

4,1

25

)0

0

(4

9,1

25

)0

(49

,12

5)

0(9

12

) (9

12

) 1

8,9

13

(68

,03

8)

City -

Win

ter

Ma

inte

na

nce

40

,00

0

0

0

0

40

,00

0

0

40

,00

0

0

41

,65

7

41

,65

7

40

,00

0

0

To

tal

Oth

er

55

,00

0

(64

,12

5)

0

0

(9,1

25

)0

(9,1

25

)0

4

0,7

45

4

0,7

45

5

8,9

13

(6

8,0

38

)

Fe

es

, e

tc.

Fix

ed

Fe

es

Ca

rlis

le0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

City C

laim

ed

Rig

hts

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Tim

e C

ha

rge

s/

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Fe

es

Ca

rlis

le0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

City C

laim

ed

Rig

hts

74

,60

0

48

,90

9

0

0

12

3,5

09

0

1

23

,50

9

0

42

,71

7

42

,71

7

12

3,5

09

(0

)

To

tal

Fe

es

, e

tc.

74

,60

0

48

,90

9

0

0

12

3,5

09

0

1

23

,50

9

0

42

,71

7

42

,71

7

12

3,5

09

(0

)

To

tal

Hig

hw

ay

s R

ev

en

ue

Bu

dg

et

2,5

32

,78

8

(15

,21

6)

0

0

2,5

17

,57

2

0

2,5

17

,57

2

17

2,0

73

1

,84

3,8

13

2

,01

5,8

86

2

,57

4,1

59

(5

6,5

87

)

Ca

rlis

le L

oc

al

Co

mm

itte

e

Page 38

AP

PE

ND

IX G

(1)

Hig

hw

ay

s R

ev

en

ue

20

12

/13

Bu

dg

et

De

sc

rip

tio

nA

pp

rov

ed

Bu

dg

et

Bro

ug

ht

Fo

rwa

rdV

ire

me

nts

In

Vir

em

en

ts

Ou

t

Re

vis

ed

Bu

dg

et

Oth

er

Co

ntr

ibs

Sp

en

din

g L

imit

Co

mm

itte

dP

ay

me

nts

Co

mm

itte

d a

nd

Pa

id

Es

tim

ate

d

Ou

ttu

rn

Un

all

oc

ate

d

Ba

lan

ce

s

Po

sit

ion

as

at:

28

th F

eb

rua

ry 2

01

££

££

££

££

££

£

Be

tte

r H

igh

wa

ys

Be

tte

r H

igh

wa

ys O

ut

of

Ho

urs

00

00

0

0

0

0

Be

tte

r H

igh

wa

ys P

lan

t &

Ma

teria

ls0

00

3,2

07

3

,84

4

7,0

51

0

0

Be

tte

r H

igh

wa

ys T

ea

ms

73

2,1

88

7

32

,18

8

07

32

,18

89

1,8

38

6

79

,87

1

77

1,7

09

7

61

,49

3

(29

,30

5)

Su

b T

ota

l B

ett

er

Hig

hw

ay

s7

32

,18

8

0

0

0

73

2,1

88

0

7

32

,18

8

95

,04

5

68

3,7

15

7

78

,76

0

76

1,4

93

(2

9,3

05

)

Cy

cli

c M

ain

ten

an

ce

Ve

rge

Ma

inta

ina

nce

50

,00

0

50

,00

0

50

,00

0

3,4

90

3

1,8

12

3

5,3

02

3

1,8

12

1

8,1

88

Gu

lly C

lea

nsin

g9

0,0

00

9

0,0

00

9

0,0

00

3

9,0

81

7

3,0

12

1

12

,09

3

11

8,6

14

(2

8,6

14

)

Sig

ns a

nd

Ro

ad

ma

rkin

gs

35

,00

0

35

,00

0

35

,00

0

81

8

0

81

8

81

8

34

,18

2

Su

b T

ota

l C

yc

lic

ma

inta

ina

nc

e1

75

,00

0

0

0

0

17

5,0

00

0

1

75

,00

0

43

,38

9

10

4,8

24

1

48

,21

3

15

1,2

44

2

3,7

56

To

tal

Ba

sic

Ma

inte

na

nc

e9

07

,18

8

0

0

0

90

7,1

88

0

9

07

,18

8

13

8,4

34

7

88

,53

9

92

6,9

73

9

12

,73

7

(5,5

49

)

Ro

ad

Lig

hti

ng

En

erg

y4

62

,00

04

62

,00

04

62

,00

00

3

32

,18

3

33

2,1

83

4

62

,00

00

Lig

htin

g,

Sig

na

ls,

Illu

min

ate

d S

ign

s1

40

,00

01

40

,00

01

40

,00

01

1,9

56

8

3,3

02

9

5,2

58

1

23

,00

01

7,0

00

Tra

ffic

Sig

na

ls1

48

,00

01

48

,00

01

48

,00

02

1,6

83

9

7,8

32

1

19

,51

5

14

8,0

00

0

To

tal

Ro

ad

Lig

hti

ng

75

0,0

00

0

0

0

7

50

,00

0

0

75

0,0

00

3

3,6

39

5

13

,31

7

54

6,9

56

7

33

,00

0

17

,00

0

Oth

er

Un

allo

ca

ted

Ba

lan

ce

00

00

0

0

0

Ba

lan

ce

B/f

wd

20

11

/12

0(6

4,1

25

) (6

4,1

25

) (6

4,1

25

)0

0

0

(6

4,1

25

)

Ba

d D

eb

t P

rovis

ion

15

,00

00

1

5,0

00

1

5,0

00

(4,8

25

) (4

,82

5)

15

,00

00

Oth

er

00

03

,91

3

3,9

13

3

,91

3

(3,9

13

)

To

tal

Oth

er

15

,00

0

(64

,12

5)

0

0

(49

,12

5)

0(4

9,1

25

)0

(91

2)

(91

2)

18

,91

3(6

8,0

38

)

To

tal

Hig

hw

ay

s R

ev

en

ue

Bu

dg

et

1,6

72

,18

8

(64

,12

5)

0

0

1,6

08

,06

3

0

1,6

08

,06

3

17

2,0

73

1

,30

0,9

44

1

,47

3,0

17

1

,66

4,6

50

(5

6,5

87

)

Cu

mb

ria

Hig

hw

ay

s

Page 39

AP

PE

ND

IX G

(2)

Hig

hw

ay

s R

ev

en

ue

20

12

/13

Bu

dg

et

De

sc

rip

tio

nA

pp

rov

ed

Bu

dg

et

Bro

ug

ht

Fo

rwa

rdV

ire

me

nts

In

Vir

em

en

ts

Ou

t

Re

vis

ed

Bu

dg

et

Oth

er

Co

ntr

ibs

Sp

en

din

g L

imit

Co

mm

itte

dP

ay

me

nts

Co

mm

itte

d a

nd

Pa

id

Es

tim

ate

d

Ou

ttu

rn

Un

all

oc

ate

d

Ba

lan

ce

s

Po

sit

ion

as

at:

28

th F

eb

rua

ry 2

01

££

££

££

££

££

£

Ba

sic

Ma

inte

na

nc

e

Hig

hw

ay R

esp

on

se

Te

am

s1

20

,00

0

12

0,0

00

1

20

,00

00

1

17

,58

5

11

7,5

85

1

20

,00

0

0

Min

or

Ca

rria

ge

wa

y R

ep

airs

45

,00

0

45

,00

0

45

,00

00

(36

,36

1)

(36

,36

1)

45

,00

00

Pe

rma

ne

nt

Ca

rria

ge

wa

y R

ep

airs

45

,00

0

45

,00

0

45

,00

00

5

3,4

97

5

3,4

97

4

5,0

00

0

Pe

rma

ne

nt

Fo

otw

ay R

ep

airs

60

,00

0

60

,00

0

60

,00

00

4

7,6

24

4

7,6

24

6

0,0

00

0

Dra

ina

ge

& R

em

ed

ial E

art

hw

ork

s6

5,0

00

6

5,0

00

6

5,0

00

0

36

,38

5

36

,38

5

65

,00

0

0

Fo

otw

ays &

Cycle

wa

ys

60

,00

0

60

,00

0

60

,00

00

2

2,3

83

2

2,3

83

6

0,0

00

0

Fe

nce

s &

Ba

rrie

rs1

,00

0

1,0

00

1

,00

00

0

0

1

,00

0

0

Ve

rge

Ma

inte

na

nce

30

,00

0

30

,00

0

30

,00

00

2

1,7

53

2

1,7

53

3

0,0

00

0

Sw

ee

pin

g &

Sca

ve

ng

ing

30

,00

0

30

,00

0

30

,00

00

1

5,6

82

1

5,6

82

3

0,0

00

0

Cle

an

sin

g1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

1

00

,00

00

6

8,7

19

6

8,7

19

1

00

,00

0

0

No

n-I

llum

ina

ted

Tra

ffic

Sig

ns

30

,00

0

30

,00

0

30

,00

00

2

2,7

89

2

2,7

89

3

0,0

00

0

Oth

er

00

0

0

0

0

0

Win

ter

Da

ma

ge

Pe

rma

ne

nt

Pa

tch

ing

00

0

0

0

0

0

Un

allo

ca

ted

Ba

lan

ce

0

0

0

00

0

0

0

0

To

tal

Ba

sic

Ma

inte

na

nc

e5

86

,00

0

0

0

0

58

6,0

00

0

5

86

,00

0

0

37

0,0

56

3

70

,05

6

58

6,0

00

0

Ro

ad

Lig

hti

ng

Lig

htin

g,

Sig

na

ls,

Illu

min

ate

d S

ign

s1

60

,00

0

16

0,0

00

16

0,0

00

0

12

0,0

30

1

20

,03

01

60

,00

00

Co

lum

n R

ep

lace

me

nt

& P

ain

tin

g0

0(3

1,5

91

)(3

1,5

91

)0

0

To

tal

Ro

ad

Lig

hti

ng

16

0,0

00

0

0

0

1

60

,00

0

0

16

0,0

00

0

8

8,4

39

8

8,4

39

1

60

,00

0

0

Win

ter

Ma

inte

na

nce

De

leg

ate

d4

0,0

00

4

0,0

00

4

0,0

00

0

41

,65

7

41

,65

7

40

,00

0

0

To

tal

Oth

er

40

,00

0

0

0

0

40

,00

0

0

40

,00

0

0

41

,65

7

41

,65

7

40

,00

0

0

Fe

es

, e

tc.

Ba

sic

Ma

inte

na

nce

74

,60

07

4,6

00

74

,60

00

4

0,2

62

4

0,2

62

6

4,2

45

1

0,3

55

Ro

ad

Lig

htin

g0

00

6

,40

5

6,4

05

6

,40

5

(6,4

05

)

Win

ter

ma

inta

ina

nce

00

0(3

,95

0)

(3,9

50

)3

,95

0(3

,95

0)

Ba

lan

ce

B/F

wd

20

11

/12

48

,90

94

8,9

09

48

,90

90

0

0

4

8,9

09

0

Oth

er

(Pro

vis

ion

s f

or

tim

ech

arg

es r

esid

en

ts P

ark

ing

,

HG

V P

erm

its e

tc)

00

0

0

0

0

To

tal

Fe

es

, e

tc.

74

,60

0

48

,90

9

0

0

12

3,5

09

0

1

23

,50

9

0

42

,71

7

42

,71

7

12

3,5

09

(0

)

To

tal

Hig

hw

ay

s R

ev

en

ue

Bu

dg

et

86

0,6

00

4

8,9

09

0

0

9

09

,50

9

0

90

9,5

09

0

5

42

,86

9

54

2,8

69

9

09

,50

9

(0)

Cla

ime

d R

igh

t C

arl

isle

Cit

y L

oc

al

Co

mm

itte

e

Page 40

AP

PE

ND

IX H

HIG

HW

AY

S C

AP

ITA

L 2

01

2/1

3

De

sc

rip

tio

nO

rig

ina

l

Bu

dg

et

Bro

ug

ht

Fo

rwa

rdV

ire

me

nts

In

Vir

em

en

ts

Ou

t

Re

vis

ed

Bu

dg

et

Oth

er

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n

s

Sp

en

din

g

Lim

itC

om

mit

ted

Pa

ym

en

tsC

om

mit

ed

an

d P

aid

Es

tim

ate

d

Ou

ttu

rn

Un

all

oc

ate

d

Ba

lan

ce

s

Po

sit

ion

as

at:

28

th F

eb

rua

ry 2

01

££

££

££

££

££

£

Ca

pit

al

Sc

he

me

s

20

11

/12

Sc

he

me

s

NP

RN

C/F

wd

20

11

/12

34

6,4

75

(3

46

,47

5)

00

00

0

No

t S

pe

cifie

d0

0

0

15

5,7

48

81

21

56

,56

00

0

CE

70

00

03

5 A

rch

ive

s H

LF

Sta

ge

20

0

0

31

4

31

4

31

4(3

14

)

HA

13

05

90

0 P

SD

P0

0

0

0

26

4

26

4

26

4(2

64

)

HC

1A

20

00

1S

urf

ace

Dre

ssin

g N

PR

N0

0

0

0

27

,98

4

27

,98

4

27

,98

4(2

7,9

84

)

HC

31

19

80

0 L

ea

rnin

g V

illa

ge

Gre

en

wa

y0

0

0

0(1

5,1

71

)(1

5,1

71

)(1

5,1

71

)1

5,1

71

HC

32

29

80

0 L

ED

Un

its W

est

To

we

r U

/Pa

ss

0

0

00

26

52

65

26

5(2

65

)

HC

32

29

90

0 D

imm

ing

Un

its -

Va

rio

us

0

0

00

(1,8

24

)(1

,82

4)

(1,8

24

)1

,82

4

HC

33

18

30

0 S

tre

etlig

htin

g r

en

ew

als

(city)

0

0

00

(2,5

68

)(2

,56

8)

(2,5

68

)2

,56

8

HC

33

19

70

0 G

eltsd

ale

Ave

nu

e0

0

0

02

06

20

62

06

(20

6)

HC

33

19

70

0 T

alk

in C

lose

0

0

00

23

62

36

23

6(2

36

)

HC

33

24

50

0 S

urf

ace

Dre

ssin

g 1

1/1

20

0

0

02

86

28

62

86

(28

6)

HC

33

24

60

0 P

re S

urf

ace

Dre

ssin

g 1

1/1

20

0

0

05

17

51

75

17

(51

7)

HC

33

25

10

0 H

ow

ard

Ho

use

, G

ilsla

nd

0

0

00

1,7

40

1,7

40

1,7

40

(1,7

40

)

HC

33

25

20

0 W

allb

eck,

Bru

nsto

ck

0

0

00

(1,0

00

)(1

,00

0)

(1,0

00

)1

,00

0

HC

33

25

50

0 S

lurr

y S

ea

l P

rog

ram

me

0

0

00

(4,8

98

)(4

,89

8)

(4,8

98

)4

,89

8

HC

33

25

60

0 C

ald

ew

Cycle

pa

th0

0

0

0(2

,85

6)

(2,8

56

)(2

,85

6)

2,8

56

HC

33

25

70

0 A

rea

Te

am

7 w

inte

r0

0

0

05

77

57

75

77

(57

7)

HC

33

25

80

0 A

rea

Te

am

8 w

inte

r0

0

0

01

96

19

61

96

(19

6)

HC

33

25

90

0 A

rea

Te

am

9 w

inte

r0

0

0

09

29

29

2(9

2)

HC

33

26

00

0 A

rea

Te

am

10

win

ter

0

0

00

35

35

35

(35

)

HC

33

26

30

0 L

igh

tin

g/S

ign

s/S

ign

als

Ho

ldin

g0

0

0

0(2

,45

8)

(2,4

58

)(2

,45

8)

2,4

58

HC

33

26

60

0 P

ub

lic T

ran

sp

ort

In

fra

str

uctu

re0

0

0

0

4,4

19

4

,41

9

4,4

19

(4,4

19

)

HC

33

26

90

0 P

relim

ina

ry d

esig

n (

lum

p s

um

s)

0

0

00

1,2

04

1,2

04

1,2

04

(1,2

04

)

HC

33

27

20

0 D

urd

ar

Ju

nctio

n0

0

0

0(4

,13

4)

(4,1

34

)(4

,13

4)

4,1

34

HC

33

28

10

0 C

urr

ock R

oa

d0

0

0

0(1

,70

6)

(1,7

06

)(1

,70

6)

1,7

06

HC

33

29

90

0 R

ep

lace

Co

lum

ns B

otc

he

rga

te/L

on

do

n R

d0

0

0

00

00

0

HC

35

00

70

0 C

/Wa

y r

ep

airs -

Cla

ssifie

d in

City

0

0

00

17

41

74

17

4(1

74

)

HC

35

00

80

0 C

arr

aig

ew

ay R

ep

airs -

Un

cla

ssifie

d0

0

0

05

,50

25

,50

25

,50

2(5

,50

2)

HC

35

00

90

0 C

on

c B

ays K

no

we

fie

ld a

ve

nu

e0

0

0

04

,72

14

,72

14

,72

1(4

,72

1)

HC

30

51

00

0 C

on

c B

ays H

olm

acre

s D

rive

0

0

00

(7,8

06

)(7

,80

6)

(7,8

06

)7

,80

6

HC

35

01

40

0 S

lurr

y S

ea

l F

oo

twa

ys -

Cla

ssifie

d0

0

0

09

79

79

7(9

7)

HC

35

01

50

0 P

ett

eril B

an

k R

oa

d f

/wa

y0

0

0

05

15

51

55

15

(51

5)

HC

35

01

60

0 G

reysto

ne

Rd

(M

elb

n -

Mrg

rt C

rtn

)0

0

0

01

,08

11

,08

11

,08

1(1

,08

1)

HC

35

01

80

0 M

on

tgo

me

ry B

us S

top

Dis

ab

le A

cce

ss

0

0

00

(43

8)

(43

8)

(43

8)

43

8

HC

35

02

70

0 C

ity C

orp

ora

tio

n R

d0

0

0

03

73

73

7(3

7)

HC

35

02

90

0 C

ity lo

ng

lan

ds L

ink R

d0

0

0

0(1

1,4

62

)(1

1,4

62

)(1

1,4

62

)1

1,4

62

HC

35

03

10

0 W

igto

n R

d,

A7

Sta

nw

ix B

k C

ol

0

0

00

28

32

83

28

3(2

83

)

HC

35

03

20

0 A

6 B

otc

he

rga

te -

Lo

nd

on

Rd

Co

l0

0

0

02

64

26

42

64

(26

4)

HC

35

03

40

0 C

urr

ock R

oa

d S

ou

th R

ail

Br

0

0

00

(15

,70

3)

(15

,70

3)

(15

,70

3)

15

,70

3

HC

35

03

50

0 D

un

ma

il D

rive

Re

furb

ish

Co

lum

n0

0

0

0(7

,07

7)

(7,0

77

)(7

,07

7)

7,0

77

HC

35

03

60

0 R

ich

ard

so

n S

t R

efu

rbis

h C

olu

mn

0

0

00

(14

,05

9)

(14

,05

9)

(14

,05

9)

14

,05

9

HC

35

03

70

0 F

erg

uso

n R

d &

Lis

mo

re P

lace

0

0

00

(8,2

80

)(8

,28

0)

(8,2

80

)8

,28

0

HC

35

03

80

0 B

ram

pto

n D

ivis

ion

Co

lum

ns

0

0

00

(5,8

59

)(5

,85

9)

(5,8

59

)5

,85

9

HC

35

03

90

0 C

astle

Div

isio

n C

olu

mn

s0

0

0

0(1

6,6

34

)(1

6,6

34

)(1

6,6

34

)1

6,6

34

HC

35

04

00

0 Y

ew

da

le D

ivis

ion

Co

lum

ns

0

0

00

(20

,89

0)

(20

,89

0)

(20

,89

0)

20

,89

0

HC

35

04

30

0 F

err

y H

ill W

eth

era

l0

0

0

0(3

8,8

49

)(3

8,8

49

)(3

8,8

49

)3

8,8

49

HC

3A

80

00

2 H

olm

eh

ea

d I

rish

Fo

rd0

0

0

6,0

60

94

07

,00

07

,00

0(7

,00

0)

To

tal

for

20

11

/12

Sc

he

me

s0

3

46

,47

5

0

(34

6,4

75

)0

0

0

1

62

,12

2

(13

1,2

25

)3

0,8

97

(13

2,6

63

)1

32

,66

3

Ca

rlis

le L

oc

al

Co

mm

itte

e C

ap

ita

l A

llo

ca

tio

n

Page 41

AP

PE

ND

IX H

HIG

HW

AY

S C

AP

ITA

L 2

01

2/1

3

De

sc

rip

tio

nO

rig

ina

l

Bu

dg

et

Bro

ug

ht

Fo

rwa

rdV

ire

me

nts

In

Vir

em

en

ts

Ou

t

Re

vis

ed

Bu

dg

et

Oth

er

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n

s

Sp

en

din

g

Lim

itC

om

mit

ted

Pa

ym

en

tsC

om

mit

ed

an

d P

aid

Es

tim

ate

d

Ou

ttu

rn

Un

all

oc

ate

d

Ba

lan

ce

s

Po

sit

ion

as

at:

28

th F

eb

rua

ry 2

01

££

££

££

££

££

£

Ca

rlis

le L

oc

al

Co

mm

itte

e C

ap

ita

l A

llo

ca

tio

n

20

12

/13

Sc

he

me

s

Sc

he

me

Ov

erh

ea

ds

28

6,0

00

(28

6,0

00

)0

0

0

0

0

Fo

otw

ay

s a

nd

Cy

cle

pa

th S

ch

em

es

HC

3A

20

01

7 C

10

40

Cu

mw

hin

ton

Rd

- N

o 5

2-7

82

5,9

49

4

,98

73

0,9

36

30

,93

60

16

61

66

16

63

0,7

70

HC

3A

20

01

8 O

rto

n R

oa

d -

In

gle

wo

od

to

No

41

16

,03

5

3,0

82

19

,11

71

9,1

17

0

0

0

01

9,1

17

HC

3A

20

01

9 O

rto

n R

oa

d -

No

91

- 1

16

17

,08

7

3,2

84

20

,37

12

0,3

71

0

0

0

02

0,3

71

HC

3A

20

02

0 C

10

20

Cu

mw

hin

ton

Pu

b T

ow

ard

s S

co

tby

13

,43

9

2,5

83

16

,02

21

6,0

22

09

,64

79

,64

71

6,0

22

0

HC

3A

20

02

1 E

aste

rn W

ay C

W -

Win

do

w S

ys -

To

uca

n1

1,5

44

2

,21

91

3,7

63

13

,76

31

,48

61

3,9

50

15

,43

61

5,4

36

(1,6

73

)

HC

3A

20

02

2 V

icto

ria

Pla

ce

/Sp

en

ce

r S

t Ju

nctio

n6

,72

3

1,2

92

8,0

15

8,0

15

0

18

8

18

8

8,0

15

0

HC

3A

20

02

3 E

aste

rn W

ay C

W -

Lo

nd

on

rd

to

Su

rge

ry6

,85

0

1,3

17

8,1

67

8,1

67

08

,35

48

,35

48

,35

4(1

87

)

HC

3A

20

02

4 S

tan

wix

Ba

nk C

ricke

t C

lub

22

,83

3

4,3

89

27

,22

22

7,2

22

22

,91

58

62

23

,77

72

7,2

22

0

HC

3A

20

02

5 U

pp

erb

y r

oa

d N

o 5

2 t

o E

mb

erle

y R

d2

0,5

61

3

,95

22

4,5

13

24

,51

32

2,3

49

1,0

89

23

,43

82

4,5

13

0

HC

3A

20

03

0 E

dg

eh

ill R

d -

Sp

rin

gfie

ld R

d -

Alla

nd

ale

Rd

22

,74

8

22

,74

8

22

,74

82

2,7

48

41

22

,78

92

2,7

48

0

HC

3A

20

03

1 W

hin

sm

oo

r D

rive

Ea

st

Sid

e2

0,1

28

2

0,1

28

2

0,1

28

20

,12

8

0

20

,12

8

20

,12

80

HC

3A

20

03

2 P

ort

lan

d P

lace

28

,05

2

28

,05

2

28

,05

22

8,0

52

0

2

8,0

52

2

8,0

52

0

HC

3A

20

03

3 G

reysto

ne

Rd

- B

run

ton

Ave

28

,74

7

28

,74

7

28

,74

72

8,7

47

2

89

2

9,0

36

2

8,7

47

0

HC

3A

20

03

4 F

use

hill

Str

ee

t -

Bro

ad

St

17

,86

1

17

,86

1

17

,86

11

7,8

61

0

1

7,8

61

1

7,8

61

0

HC

3A

20

03

5 L

ism

ore

Pla

ce

- S

tra

nd

Rd

18

,30

4

18

,30

4

18

,30

41

5,2

69

3,5

91

18

,86

01

8,3

04

0

HC

3A

20

03

6 S

tra

nd

Ro

ad

Ge

org

ian

Wa

y T

r C

ity

0

14

,56

2

14

,56

2

14

,56

20

0

0

1

4,5

62

0

Ca

rra

ige

wa

y M

ain

tain

an

ce

Sc

he

me

s

HC

3A

20

00

1 S

urf

ace

Dre

ssin

g P

rog

ram

me

22

4,5

47

2

24

,54

7

22

4,5

47

02

62

,13

92

62

,13

92

58

,62

2(3

4,0

75

)

HC

3A

20

00

2 M

icro

Asp

ha

lt P

rog

ram

me

32

8,3

02

1

14

,37

2

44

2,6

74

4

42

,67

41

13

,39

73

03

,08

04

16

,47

73

56

,96

88

5,7

06

HC

3A

20

00

7 N

els

on

Brid

ge

87

,70

9

87

,70

9

87

,70

90

84

,31

28

4,3

12

84

,31

23

,39

7

HC

3A

20

00

8 B

ellv

ue

to

Cle

ug

hsid

e3

2,0

00

3

2,0

00

3

2,0

00

04

9,6

94

49

,69

44

9,6

94

(17

,69

4)

HC

3A

20

00

9 S

tels

ha

e t

o R

ou

tle

dg

eb

urn

24

,00

0

24

,00

0

24

,00

00

30

,15

93

0,1

59

30

,15

9(6

,15

9)

HC

3A

20

01

0 R

ed

Ca

t to

wa

rds B

urt

hw

aite

- P

ha

se

18

8,0

00

8

8,0

00

8

8,0

00

3,2

77

11

1,8

14

11

5,0

91

11

3,1

53

(25

,15

3)

HC

3A

20

01

1 R

oa

dh

ea

d6

3,0

00

6

3,0

00

6

3,0

00

03

8,3

19

38

,31

93

8,3

19

24

,68

1

HC

3A

20

01

2 T

he

Ba

rn t

o P

rio

rig

g C

ott

ag

e1

6,0

00

1

6,0

00

1

6,0

00

16

,48

72

2,8

55

39

,34

22

2,6

35

(6,6

35

)

HC

3A

20

01

3 C

arlis

le A

irp

ort

Jn

c t

o U

10

94

Jn

c6

0,0

00

6

0,0

00

6

0,0

00

5,5

31

48

,96

55

4,4

96

43

,87

61

6,1

24

HC

3A

20

01

4 B

urn

sid

e B

rid

ge

to

Fe

rgu

sh

ill C

ott

ag

e3

0,0

00

3

0,0

00

3

0,0

00

04

7,9

34

47

,93

44

7,9

34

(17

,93

4)

HC

3A

20

01

5 B

ram

pto

n -

Co

bb

les o

uts

ide

Po

st

Off

ice

13

,51

9

2,5

98

1

6,1

17

1

6,1

17

27

,23

33

,15

73

0,3

90

21

,90

7(5

,79

0)

HC

3A

20

06

0 H

esp

in W

oo

d E

ntr

an

ce

to

C1

02

20

6

0,0

00

6

0,0

00

6

0,0

00

61

,77

28

79

62

,65

16

9,6

51

(9,6

51

)

HC

3A

20

06

1 N

ew

lan

d F

arm

Ju

nctio

n0

2

7,0

00

2

7,0

00

2

7,0

00

0

0

0

27

,00

00

To

tal

for

20

12

/13

Sc

he

me

s1

,52

9,9

38

0

2

45

,63

7

(28

6,0

00

)1

,48

9,5

75

0

1

,48

9,5

75

4

07

,25

2

1,0

41

,48

4

1,4

48

,73

6

1,4

14

,36

0

75

,21

5

Min

or

Str

uc

tura

l M

ain

ten

an

ce

Min

or

Str

uc

tura

l M

ain

ten

an

ce

Sc

he

me

s

H

C3

A2

00

05

Pre

pa

rato

ry P

atc

hin

g f

or

20

13

43

4,8

78

1

81

,46

76

16

,34

56

16

,34

51

64

,74

43

86

,28

55

51

,02

98

64

,62

6(2

48

,28

1)

H

C3

A2

00

06

Min

or

Str

uctu

ral R

ep

airs

29

1,0

00

9

7,6

57

38

8,6

57

38

8,6

57

91

,01

43

61

,25

04

52

,26

43

88

,65

70

H

C3

A2

00

04

Pa

tch

Sp

rayin

g7

5,0

00

1

4,4

15

89

,41

58

9,4

15

20

,31

49

2,4

99

11

2,8

13

92

,49

6(3

,08

1)

HC

3A

20

00

3 P

rep

ara

tory

Pa

ch

ing

20

12

Ad

ditio

na

l1

00

,00

0

36

,65

01

36

,65

01

36

,65

01

5,4

07

10

7,1

63

12

2,5

70

12

2,5

70

14

,08

0

Dra

ina

ge

an

d R

em

ed

ial

Ea

rth

wo

rk S

ch

em

es

H

C3

A2

00

40

Lo

w C

rosb

y3

,00

0

3,0

00

3

,00

00

0

0

3

,00

00

H

C3

A2

00

41

Gre

en

we

ll V

illa

ge

22

,51

4

4,3

27

26

,84

12

6,8

41

03

5,7

12

35

,71

22

3,7

09

3,1

32

H

C3

A2

00

42

To

pp

in C

astle

6,4

00

1

,23

07

,63

07

,63

00

5,8

35

5,8

35

7,6

30

0

H

C3

A2

00

43

Old

Sch

oo

l H

ou

se

, H

allb

an

kg

ate

24

,77

0

4,7

61

29

,53

12

9,5

31

14

,57

72

,26

11

6,8

38

22

,00

07

,53

1

H

C3

A2

00

44

Ne

wto

wn

Vill

ag

e1

4,5

82

2

,80

31

7,3

85

17

,38

55

,00

68

,94

21

3,9

48

13

,94

83

,43

7

Page 42

AP

PE

ND

IX H

HIG

HW

AY

S C

AP

ITA

L 2

01

2/1

3

De

sc

rip

tio

nO

rig

ina

l

Bu

dg

et

Bro

ug

ht

Fo

rwa

rdV

ire

me

nts

In

Vir

em

en

ts

Ou

t

Re

vis

ed

Bu

dg

et

Oth

er

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n

s

Sp

en

din

g

Lim

itC

om

mit

ted

Pa

ym

en

tsC

om

mit

ed

an

d P

aid

Es

tim

ate

d

Ou

ttu

rn

Un

all

oc

ate

d

Ba

lan

ce

s

Po

sit

ion

as

at:

28

th F

eb

rua

ry 2

01

££

££

££

££

££

£

Ca

rlis

le L

oc

al

Co

mm

itte

e C

ap

ita

l A

llo

ca

tio

n

H

C3

A2

00

45

Ho

rnsb

y G

ate

- N

r C

arla

tte

n9

,57

1

1,8

40

11

,41

11

1,4

11

7,4

02

54

97

,95

11

1,4

11

0

To

tal

for

Min

or

Str

uc

tura

l M

ain

ten

an

ce

98

1,7

15

0

3

45

,15

0

0

1,3

26

,86

5

0

1,3

26

,86

5

31

8,4

64

1

,00

0,4

96

1

,31

8,9

60

1

,55

0,0

47

(22

3,1

82

)

Lig

hti

ng

an

d T

raff

ic S

ign

als

HC

3A

20

04

8 A

7 S

co

tla

nd

Rd

- E

tte

rby S

t -

Wa

ve

rle

y R

d2

5,3

44

4

,87

13

0,2

15

30

,21

52

8,1

57

47

92

8,6

36

28

,63

61

,57

9

HC

3A

20

04

9 C

10

36

St

Nic

ho

las S

t/B

lackw

ell

Te

rra

ce

25

,00

0

4,8

05

29

,80

52

9,8

05

27

,77

55

10

28

,28

52

8,2

85

1,5

20

HC

3A

20

05

0 C

10

16

Ett

erb

y S

tre

et

22

,58

2

4,3

40

26

,92

22

6,9

22

28

,02

55

73

28

,59

82

8,5

98

(1,6

76

)

HC

3A

20

05

1 B

52

99

Da

lsto

n R

d (

Ce

me

tary

/Pire

lli)

9,5

92

1

,84

41

1,4

36

11

,43

61

0,6

58

48

91

1,1

47

11

,14

72

89

HC

3A

20

05

2 B

52

99

Ca

rlis

le R

d/S

qu

are

Da

lsto

n3

8,2

37

7

,34

94

5,5

86

45

,58

64

2,4

81

53

24

3,0

13

43

,01

32

,57

3

HC

3A

20

05

3 C

10

43

Cu

mw

hin

ton

Ro

ad

8,0

00

1

,53

89

,53

89

,53

87

,92

11

,44

69

,36

79

,36

71

71

HC

3A

20

05

4 A

6 L

on

do

n R

d B

Q/H

arr

ab

y I

nn

Lig

hts

9,5

92

1

,84

41

1,4

36

11

,43

61

0,6

57

47

21

1,1

29

11

,12

93

07

HC

3A

20

05

5 C

ity L

igh

tin

g R

en

ew

als

50

,00

0

50

,00

0

50

,00

05

0,0

00

0

5

0,0

00

4

0,0

00

10

,00

0

HC

3A

20

05

7 A

6 C

arlis

le C

ity c

en

tre

- L

ow

the

r S

t3

5,0

00

3

5,0

00

3

5,0

00

11

,81

01

0,4

42

22

,25

22

2,2

52

12

,74

8

HC

33

29

90

0 R

ep

lace

me

nt

Co

lou

ms B

-ga

te,

Lo

nd

on

Rd

0

16

,16

11

6,1

61

16

,16

10

1

,43

0

1,4

30

1

6,1

61

0

To

tal

Lig

hti

ng

an

d T

raff

ic S

ign

als

22

3,3

47

0

4

2,7

52

0

2

66

,09

9

0

26

6,0

99

2

17

,48

4

16

,37

3

23

3,8

57

2

38

,58

8

27

,51

1

Hig

hw

ay

s I

mp

rov

em

en

ts 2

01

1/1

2 (

form

erl

y A

PM

)

Ba

lan

ce

B/F

wd

20

11

/12

0

48

,55

5

(48

,55

5)

00

00

0

HC

33

26

40

0 B

otc

he

rby 2

0m

ph

Zo

ne

0

19

,11

1

19

,11

11

9,1

11

13

,51

51

,65

91

5,1

74

19

,11

10

HC

33

26

60

0 L

ow

the

r S

tre

et

Imp

rove

me

n0

3

,43

3

3,4

33

3,4

33

00

03

,43

30

HC

35

01

90

0 T

RO

Va

ria

tio

n o

rde

r 3

70

0

0

05

52

55

25

52

(55

2)

HC

33

26

50

0 B

urg

h b

y S

an

ds G

ate

wa

y0

1

,64

2

1,6

42

1

,64

20

1,9

98

1,9

98

1,9

98

(35

6)

HC

33

26

70

0 B

arr

ier

an

d R

aili

ng

re

pla

ce

me

nt

Ca

rlis

le0

1

5,2

34

15

,23

41

5,2

34

03

,99

43

,99

41

2,9

94

2,2

40

To

tal

for

Hig

hw

ay

s I

mp

rov

em

en

ts 2

01

1/1

20

4

8,5

55

3

9,4

20

(4

8,5

55

)3

9,4

20

0

3

9,4

20

1

3,5

15

8

,20

3

21

,71

8

38

,08

8

1,3

32

Hig

hw

ay

s I

mp

rov

em

en

ts 2

01

2/1

3

H

C3

A1

00

01

Bla

ckw

ell

Rd

- P

ed

estr

ian

Bu

ild O

uts

5,0

00

9

61

5,9

61

5,9

61

6,2

02

1,3

19

7,5

21

7,7

51

(1,7

90

)

H

C3

A1

00

02

Hu

rle

y r

d F

oo

tpa

th2

1,0

00

2

1,0

00

2

1,0

00

01

6,8

73

16

,87

31

6,8

70

4,1

30

H

C3

A1

00

03

Min

or

Lo

ca

l S

afe

ty S

ch

em

es

12

,00

0

5,3

06

17

,30

61

7,3

06

3,3

44

13

,25

21

6,5

96

17

,30

60

H

C3

A1

00

04

TR

O C

arlis

le 2

01

2 (

1)

10

,00

0

10

,00

0

10

,00

01

,68

89

,47

71

1,1

65

10

,00

00

HC

3A

10

00

5 T

RO

Ca

rlis

le 2

01

2 (

2)

Ca

stle

/St

Aid

an

s1

5,0

00

(3

,00

0)

12

,00

01

2,0

00

04

,12

24

,12

27

,00

05

,00

0

HC

3A

10

00

6 T

RO

Ca

rlis

le 2

01

2 (

3)

Ca

stle

/Be

lle V

ue

/De

n1

0,0

00

1

0,0

00

1

0,0

00

2,5

81

12

,22

11

4,8

02

12

,22

1(2

,22

1)

HC

3A

10

00

7 S

pe

ed

Re

str

ictio

n S

co

tby

5,0

00

9

60

5,9

60

5,9

60

27

43

,86

04

,13

43

,85

62

,10

4

HC

3A

10

00

8 L

on

gto

wn

So

uth

Sp

ee

d L

imit r

evie

w1

1,0

00

1

1,0

00

1

1,0

00

01

,95

21

,95

21

9,6

21

(8,6

21

)

HC

3A

10

00

9 J

44

to

Bla

ckfo

rd C

rossro

ad

s S

pe

ed

Lim

it R

e1

6,0

00

1

6,0

00

1

6,0

00

01

,65

51

,65

58

,74

77

,25

3

HC

3A

10

01

0 S

pe

ed

In

Vill

ag

es

20

,00

0

3,8

44

23

,84

42

3,8

44

6,3

33

10

,60

81

6,9

41

16

,84

47

,00

0

To

tal

for

Hig

hw

ay

s I

mp

rov

em

en

ts 2

01

2/1

31

25

,00

0

0

11

,07

1

(3,0

00

)1

33

,07

1

0

13

3,0

71

2

0,4

22

7

5,3

39

9

5,7

61

1

20

,21

6

12

,85

5

To

tal

for

Hig

hw

ay

s I

mp

rov

em

en

ts1

25

,00

0

48

,55

5

50

,49

1

(51

,55

5)

17

2,4

91

0

1

72

,49

1

33

,93

7

83

,54

2

11

7,4

79

1

58

,30

4

14

,18

7

To

tal

No

n-P

rin

cip

al

Ca

pit

al

2,8

60

,00

0

39

5,0

30

6

84

,03

0

(68

4,0

30

)3

,25

5,0

30

0

3

,25

5,0

30

1

,13

9,2

59

2

,01

0,6

70

3

,14

9,9

29

3

,22

8,6

36

2

6,3

94

Page 43

Page 44

This page is intentionally left blank

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting Date: 20 March 2013

From: Corporate Director - Environment

HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP OF

28 FEBRUARY 2013

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report gives details of the meeting of the Highways and Transportation Working Group held on 28 February 2013 and presents Working Group recommendations to the Local Committee for approval.

1.2 The Local Committee is also asked to consider additional recommendations related to the matters considered by the Working Group.

2.0 POLICY POSITION, BUDGETARY AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS AND LINKS TO CORPORATE STRATEGY

2.1 The recommendations within this report relate to budgets and programmes that are devolved to this Local Committee for determination and delivery.

2.2 The policy position, links to corporate strategy, and the budgetary implications are set out in the individual Working Group reports previously circulated to Members.

3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

3.1 CYCLING IMPROVEMENTS

AGREED to recommend to Local Committee that officers reassess the cycle route strategy for the City and, where possible, enable the preparation of schemes for future bids. 3.2 TRAVEL STRATEGY

AGREED that the Group receive a further report that provides costs for the priorities listed in Appendix 1 and information on potential funding sources.

Agenda Item 7

Page 45

3.3 SHADY GROVE ROAD BUS STOP

AGREED that the Group defer this item to the next H&TWG 3.4 PARKING REVIEW UPDATE

AGREED that the Group recommend to Local Committee that they

• Note the Task Groups findings regarding Parking Demand Generators and their associated parking demands.

• Agree to adopt the parking demand criteria and the process to establish appropriate parking restrictions, as set out in the flow diagram.

3.5 SPEED LIMIT REVIEW

AGREED that the Group recommend to Local Committee to proceed to statutory consultation on the proposals detailed below. These proposals have been selected due to the average traffic flow, the road environment and the road function:

• to introduce a 40mph speed limit on the A6071 through the village of Newtown for a distance of approximately 300m;

• to introduce a 30mph speed limit on the U1098 through Newtown for a distance of approximately 700m;

• to introduce a 40mph speed limit on the B6264 Brampton Old Road for a distance of approximately 770m;

• to extend the 30mph speed limit on the B6264 Brampton Old Road by a distance of approximately 90m in an outbound direction.

AGREED that the Group recommend that Local Committee resolve that, subject to there being no objections, the Traffic Regulation Orders be made as advertised having taken into consideration the matters contained in Section 122(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 which are more specifically referred to at paragraph 7.2 of the Report. 3.6 CRASH GROUP UPDATE

AGREED that the Group recommend that the report is noted by the Local Committee. 3.7 2013/ 14 HIGHWAYS BUDGETS

AGREED that the Group recommend to Local Committee agrees the proposed revenue and devolved capital programmes for 2013. Also that the Local committee notes the schemes to be undertaken in Carlisle from within the central block of the Transport Capital Programme.

Page 46

It was also agreed that Local Committee be asked to note the Group’s support for the need to identify sources of funding that could be used for the preparation of future projects. 3.8 2012/ 13 CAPITAL PROGRESS BUDGET REPORT

AGREED that the Group note progress with the 2012/13 Capital Programme as reference in paragraphs 4.3 and 4.3 of the report. 3.9 AREA MANAGERS BRIEFING

It was agreed that Mr Walsh would provide a separate report updating the Local Committee on progress with Traffic Calming proposals following the opening of CNDR.

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 The notes of the Highways and Transport Working Group held on 28 February are attached at Appendix 1 to this report, together with recommendations to Local Committee where appropriate. The recommendations from the Working Group are summarised at paragraph 3.1.

4.2 The relevant Working Group reports have previously been circulated to Members.

5 OPTIONS

5.1 The options in respect of each of the recommendations are set out in the original reports to the Working Group previously circulated to Members.

6 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 The resource and value for money implications in respect of each of the recommendations are set out in the original reports to the Working Group previously circulated to Members.

7 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 The legal implications in respect of each of the recommendations are set out in the original reports to the Working Group previously circulated to Members and attached to this Report.

8 CONCLUSION

8.1 The Local Committee is asked to consider the recommendations made by the Working Group and the supplementary information set out in the report.

Andrew Moss Assistant Director Highways and Transport 28 February 2013

Page 47

APPENDICES Appendix 1 - Carlisle Highways and Transport Working Group –

28 February 2013

Appendix 2 - Cycling Improvements

Appendix 3 - Travel Strategy

Appendix 4 - Shadygrove Road Bus Stop

Appendix 5 - Parking Review Update

Appendix 6 - Speed Limit Review

Appendix 7 - CRASH Group Update

Appendix 8 - 2013/14 Highways Budget

Appendix 9 - 2012/13 Capital Progress Budget Report

Appendix 10 - Area Managers Briefing

Page 48

IMPLICATIONS Staffing: None

Financial: The highways budgets referred to in the report are devolved to local committees for determination and delivery.

Electoral Division(s): All

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

No

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? No

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS

None.

Contact: Kevin Walsh Tel. No: (01228) 221386 E-mail: [email protected]

Page 49

Page 50

Appendix 1

CARLISLE HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP

Minutes of a Meeting of the Carlisle Highways and Transport Working Group held

On Thursday 28 February 2013 at 10.00am at the Courts, Carlisle

PRESENT:

Mr J Mallinson (Chair)

Mr C Weber Mr LN Fisher Mr T Allison Mrs V Tarbitt

Mr R Watson Mr J Bell (Observer) Mr R Betton Mr H McDevitt

Also in Attendance:- Mr K Walsh Mr K Crawley Mrs A Dodds Mr M Foster Mr M Brierley Mr D Sheard Mrs C Cowperthwaite

- Interim Area Manager Highways, Carlisle - Traffic Management Engineer - Traffic Management Officer - Network Manager, Carlisle - Cycling Officer - Area Support Manager North - Locality Transport Team Leader

Mr K Poole Mrs S Jenkinson Mr T Harling

- Highways Services Manager, Carlisle City - Senior Engineering Technician, Carlisle City - Cycle Carlisle

71. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Mr I Stockdale and Mrs E Martlew. 72. DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST None. 73. MINUTES The minutes of the last meeting of the Highways & Transport Working Group held on 9 January 2013 were agreed with the following amendments: Minute 59. Should read Brampton Road Bus Stop Review.

Page 51

Minute 60. The agreed outcome to read ‘AGREED that the Group recommend to Local Committee not to reinstate a bus shelter at this site.’ Minute 64. Mr Poole reported that he had received no feedback regarding parking on pavements, it is felt that the Police will not be able/willing to fine/prosecute offenders. Mionute 65. A date for the first meeting of the De-cluttering Task & Finish Group to be arranged after the Parking Review Outcome is discussed at the Local Committee on 20th March 2013. 74. CYCLING IMPROVEMENTS Mr Harling from Cycle Carlisle, distributed a list of 10 schemes the group would like to see progressed that would improve cycleways in Carlisle and followed with a presentation outlining the improvements. Various concerns were raised and comments made as to the feasibility of the schemes. Mr McDevitt thanked Mr Harling for his presentation and emphasised the advantages of cycleways for the whole community. Mr Mallinson also thanked Mr Harling and is of the opinion that it may be possible to progress some of the schemes in the future although it would not be possible to make any such decisions at this meeting. Mr Brierley presented a briefing note, Department for Transport Cycle Funding Update, outlining details of a £62 million government initiative investment to make cycling more attractive for people in England. The investment will comprise 2 elements – an urban element and an element for rural areas that are covered by national Parks, funding to boost the Community Linking Place Fund and funding to add to the fund already earmarked to tackle dangerous junctions. In Cumbria 3 schemes have been included in the Community Linking Places Funding. Cumbria County Council on behalf of the Morecambe Bay Partnership has submitted a bid for funding to tackle dangerous junctions. The decision on this bid is expected to be made shortly. Mr Watson asked how priorities would be assessed for the schemes. Mr Crawley stated priorities are set using the LTP assessment criteria and that feasibility works would need to be carried out on each scheme. Mr Walsh also stated that a Review of the Cycling Route Strategy for Carlisle could inform works for 2014-2015. Mr Weber asked if members were agreeable to put forward a bid. AGREED to recommend to Local Committee that officers reassess the cycle route strategy for the City and, where possible, enable the preparation of schemes for future bids. 75. TRAVEL STRATEGY Mrs Cowperthwaite summarised the report which was to advise members of the work taking place to prepare the Travel Strategy and in particular the local priorities that have been provided by individual Local Members which, once agreed, will then inform the potential direction to be taken and provide a local focus for the Strategy. Mr Watson asked for information regarding the withdrawal of bus services i.e. if any notice was required or if they could be withdrawn at any point? Mrs Cowperthwaite

Page 52

replied that 56 days notice is required from the operator prior to withdrawal of a service. Mr Weber stated that clarity is required on what funding is available. Mrs Cowperthwaite advised that government had not provided a third year of funding in respect of the Community Transport Transitional Fund - this fund had supported a range of community transport solutions across the County. It was being used to support Community Wheels in the next financial year and a vehicle would be available for the Carlisle area. There are areas in the County that have accessed funding from Parishes, Local Committees and other sources for both scheduled bus services and other transport solutions and the ITT would like to work with Carlisle LC to facilitate these solutions where appropriate. Mr Fisher referred to item 4.10, stating funding is available from Northumberland County Council to look at the viability of reopening the station at Gilsland and informed the Group that he will be attending a meeting on 6 March 2013 on this issue. Mr Poole informed the Group that Carlisle City have removed funding next year for the upkeep of bus shelters in the city. The funding for this year is being used to ensure that shelters are maintained up to April 2013. Mr Poole will be writing to Cumbria County Council to enquire is the County would take over maintenance of the shelters. Mr Walsh replied that the shelters are the responsibility of Parish and Town Councils and there is no legal requirement for County to maintain shelters. Mr Betton referred to item 4.4 and the importance of the transport service provided for special needs and social care, asking for clarification of the service. Mrs Cowperthwaite informed the group that this related to children attending schools. The Children’s Services Directors determine where special needs transport is provided. AGREED that the Group receive a further report that provides costs for the priorities listed in Appendix 1 and information on potential funding sources. 76. SHADYGROVE ROAD BUS STOP Mr Weber asked if this item could be deferred due to the absence of Councillor Stockdale. AGREED that the Group defer this item to the next H&TWG. 77. PARKING REVIEW UPDATE Mrs Dodds presented a report to advise of the findings of the Carlisle Parking Task and Finish group which was established to develop an assessment process to establish the most appropriate parking restriction for any street, to ensure Carlisle parking is consistent and fit for purpose. A flow diagram and parking demand criteria to help decision making have been developed and agreed by the Task group.

Page 53

Mr McDevitt thanked Mrs Dodds and Mr Crawley for the report and believes it outlines the best change of producing a feasible parking restriction strategy for Carlisle and fully recommends the report. Mr Fisher also commended the report. Mr Betton raised the need to address the problem of parking on pavements and the lack of action by the Police. Mr Walsh informed the Group that this issued could be taken forward to the CRASH team. Mr Allison expressed his concerns that resident only parking could seriously damage local business. Mr Fisher raised is concerns regarding problems with the lack of enforcement of parking restrictions in Brampton, these issues were raised at a recent Parish Council meeting. Mr Fisher informed the Group that Brampton Parish Council indicated they would be willing to help fund the enforcement of parking restrictions. Mr Poole stated that it was now a matter of urgency to review the parking zones within Carlisle to enable residents permits to be reissued. Mr Walsh stated that if agreement is achieved at Local Committee, a reasonable timescale to start the implementation of changes in Zones A & C would be 3 months with a report to the Working Group in the autumn. AGREED that the Group recommend to Local Committee that they note the Task Groups findings regarding Parking Demand Generators and their associated parking demands. Also that Local Committee agree to adopt the parking demand criteria and the process to establish appropriate parking restrictions, as set out in the flow diagram. 78. SPEED LIMIT REVIEW Mr Crawley presented to Members a report advising the Group of the next tranche of speed limits and seeks approval to proceed to statutory consultation and implementation of these proposals. AGREED that the Group recommend to Local Committee to proceed to statutory consultation on the proposals detail below. These proposals have been selected due to the average traffic flow, the road environment and the road function:

• to introduce a 40mph speed limit on the A6071 through the village of Newtown for a distance of approximately 300m;

• to introduce a 30mph speed limit on the U1098 through Newtown for a distance of approximately 700m;

• to introduce a 40mph speed limit on the B6264 Brampton Old Road for a distance of approximately 770m;

• to extend the 30mph speed limit on the B6264 Brampton Old Road by a distance of approximately 90m in an outbound direction.

AGREED that the Group recommend that Local Committee resolve that, subject to there being no objections, the Traffic Regulation Orders be made as advertised having taken into consideration the matters contained in Section 122(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 which are more specifically referred to at paragraph 7.2 of the Report.

Page 54

79. CRASH GROUP UPDATE Mr Crawley present a briefing note to further updated the Highway Working Group on issues that have been discussed at meetings of the CRASH Group since the last report which was presented in October 2012. The report details action that has taken place and advises on highway safety improvement schemes the CRASH Group would like the Local Committee to consider for future implementation. AGREED that the Group recommend that the report is noted by the Local Committee. 80. 2013/14 HIGHWAYS BUDGETS Mr Walsh presented the report to the Group to seek approval of the recommendations for the Local Committee’s devolved revenue (£2,364,031) and capital (£3,266,000) highways budgets for 2013/14 including prioritised lists of schemes, which will form the basis of the Local Committee’s devolved capital programme for 2013/14 and provide a core programme for future years subject to annual review. Mr Walsh drew attention to line 3 in the table at 4.2 relating to works on the CNDR network - £1,000 reflects the annual payment for maintenance of improvements undertaken on the network on behalf of the authority in 2012/13. Mr Walsh also pointed out that there will be no funding for preparation of schemes from April 2013 but that officers are continually looking for other possible funding opportunities. AGREED that the Group recommend to Local Committee agrees the proposed revenue and devolved capital programmes for 2013. Also that the Local committee notes the schemes to be undertaken in Carlisle from within the central block of the Transport Capital Programme. It was also agreed that Local Committee be asked to note the Group’s support for the need to identify sources of funding that could be used for the preparation of future projects. 81. 2012/13 CAPITAL PROGRESS BUDGET REPORT Mr Walsh presented the report to update members on implementation of the 2012/13 Capital Programme as agreed by Local Committee at their meeting of 22nd March 2012. Mr Weber expressed his concerns regarding the increase in costs of the Currock Bridge Scheme. Mr Walsh agreed to prepare a covering note for Local Committee on the issue of costs to progress the Currock Bridge Project.

Page 55

Mr Walsh drew attention to 4.2 (b) Lowther Street Pedestrian Improvement Scheme, stating the need to begin accumulating traffic data to enable progression of the scheme. Following discussion it was agreed to progress this data collection. AGREED that the Group note progress with the 2012/13 Capital Programme as reference in paragraphs 4.3 and 4.3 of the report. 82. AREA MANAGER’S BRIEFING Mr Walsh presented a briefing note identifying issues that could be of interest to members. Mr McDevitt asked about utilising Bousteads Grassing premises with regard to the City Transfer of Highway Operations. It was agreed that Mr Walsh would provide a separate report updating the Local Committee on progress with Traffic Calming proposals following the opening of CNDR.

Page 56

Appendix 2

CARLISLE HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP

Meeting date: 28 February 2013

From: Assistant Director- Highways and Transport

Title of Briefing: Department for Transport Cycle Funding Update Author(s): Mark Brierley Unit/Directorate: Highways and Transport/Environment Audience: H&TMT, CMT, Members, Cumbria Cycle Group. Date: 6th February 2013

1. INTRODUCTION

In January 2013, Transport Minister Norman Baker gave details of a £62 million government

investment to make cycling more attractive for people in England.

The £62m includes the £42 million cycling investment funding announced in the Chancellor’s

autumn statement. This will comprise 2 elements - an urban element and an element for

rural areas that are covered by National Parks (items 1 and 2 in the section below)

A further £15 million will be used to boost the Community Linking Places Fund to support

schemes that improve cycle-rail integration and enhance community cycling. Cumbrian

schemes that have been included in this allocation are included in the report.

£5 million will be added to the fund already earmarked to tackle dangerous junctions, with

allocations to follow in the near future.

2. DETAILS FROM THE ANNOUNCEMENTS a) Up to 3 cities will benefit from a fund of up to £30 million to make cycling easier and safer

for people in urban areas. The areas eligible to apply for those grants would be the cities

that have taken part in wave 1 and wave 2 of the City Deals process. The list of cities is:

Wave 1: Birmingham, Leeds, Sheffield, Newcastle, Bristol, Liverpool, Manchester,

Nottingham

Wave 2 : Black Country, Bournemouth/Poole, Brighton and Hove, Cambridge,

Coventry, Hull, Ipswich, Leicester, Oxford, Milton Keynes, Norwich Plymouth,

Page 57

Portsmouth/Southampton, Preston, Reading, Southend, Stoke on Trent, Sunderland,

Swindon, Tees Valley

b) A fund worth up to £12 million is being made available to local authorities working in

partnership with National Parks to improve conditions for cyclists

In Cumbria discussions are already underway with the Lake District and Yorkshire Dales

National Park Authorities to determine the schemes to be included in a bid.

Further guidance is expected form the DfT in due course.

c) £15 million boost is being given to the Community Linking Places Fund to support

schemes that improve cycle-rail integration and enhance community cycling.

3. FUNDING FOR CUMBRIA

In Cumbria the following schemes have been included in £15million Community Linking

Places Funding are:

• Millom Railway station will get an additional 10 covered cycle stands, CCTV

coverage and improved signage as part of a wider Northern Rail package

• The Hadrian’s Cycleway B5300 project will receive grant of £300,000 to complete the

6km traffic-free cycleway

• A Carlisle City Council proposal for a cycle link on the Viaduct estate ramp in Carlisle

has been awarded a grant of £40,000.

4. FURTHER FUNDING ANNOUNCEMENTS TO BE EXPECTED

In 2012, the DfT invited bids to a £15million fund to tackle dangerous junctions outside

London and an announcement listing the schemes to be funded is expected in February

2013.

In addition, the Department for Communities and Local Government is will announce the

successful bids to the English Coastal Communities Fund.

A bid by Cumbria County Council on behalf of the Morecombe Bay Partnership has been

informally informed that it has been successful (although this cannot be made public yet until

a ministerial statement later in the month).

An £80,000 proposal to develop a Morecombe Bay Cycle Way has been included in the bid,

to be jointly delivered by Lancashire and Cumbria County Councils.

Page 58

Appendix 3

CARLISLE HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP

Meeting date: 28 February 2013

From: ASSISTANT DIRECTOR – HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORT

TRAVEL STRATEGY

4.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4.1 The purpose of this report is to advise members of the work taking place to prepare the Travel Strategy and in particular the local priorities that have been provided by individual Local Members which, once agreed, will then inform the potential direction to be taken and provide a local focus for the Strategy.

5.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

5.1 The transport policies of the County Council are set out in the Local Transport Plan (LTP), the statutory policy document for transport. The current LTP is a high level document which describes the existing network and the future investment in that network. A Travel Strategy is currently being produced which will focus on how people use the networks, how the transport services can be improved and how local travel behaviour can be influenced to achieve a number of high level outcomes including supporting the economy and reducing passenger transport, road safety, travel to work etc.

5.2 The report has no equality implications.

5.3 The policies in the LTP support the Council Plan by contributing “to a place with a thriving economy”, “a great place to be a child and grow up”, “a place to enjoy an independent and healthy life” and “a place to live in a high quality and sustainable environment”.

Page 59

6.0 RECOMMENDATION

6.1 It is recommended that the Highways and Transport Working Group considers the local committee’s priorities in Appendix 1 for the travel strategy and provide recommendations to Carlisle Local Committee.

7.0 BACKGROUND

7.1 The Travel Strategy will set out the County Council’s approach to addressing travel needs within Cumbria and the related issues and opportunities now and in the future. The Travel Strategy provides a link between Central Government’s travel aspirations and other strategies and plans including the Local Transport Plan (LTP3), the Transport Management Plan and County Council’s Integrated Transport Team’s own Business Plan.

7.2 There is currently no single document that sets out the County Council’s approach and policies on travel and explains the role the County Council has in the provision of transport services. The current LTP is a high level document which describes the existing network and the future investment in that network. The Travel Strategy will build on that foundation and focus on how people use the networks, how the transport services can be improved and how local travel behaviour can be influenced to achieve a number of high level outcomes including supporting the economy and reducing carbon emissions.

7.3 The strategy will set out the Council’s priority tasks, some of which will be immediate whilst other activities will need to be applied consistently over a longer period to change travel behaviour. Travel behaviour is ultimately down to individuals making decisions based on their knowledge of the transport services available. This means that the strategy needs to set out the approach the Council’s takes to making this information available. It needs also to recognise the priority projects and programmes to reflect the differing needs of part of Cumbria whilst providing core (countywide) services as well.

7.4 The Integrated Team (ITT) procure a range of transport services for the County Council. These include home to school and special needs transport, social care transport and supported bus services where these are not provided commercially. The team have also over a number of years developed community transport services to supplement the bus network. In the Carlisle District Cumbria Community Transport are supported to provide community buses for groups at an affordable price. In Carlisle and Barrow there has been support for a number of years for a Dial a Ride service for people who due to disability cannot access conventional bus transport. In the rural areas both voluntary car schemes and Rural Wheels are available for those people who do not have scheduled bus services and need to access essential services. The ITT are proactive in facilitating and supporting local transport solutions to address community needs.

7.5 The Integrated Transport Team (ITT) also has a strategic role in relation to the rail services in Cumbria this involves working closely with Department for

Page 60

Transport (DfT) as well as the relevant rail companies to ensure that the rail services in Cumbria provide optimum social and economic benefits for Cumbria. The ITT is also responsible, on behalf of DfT, for administering the English National Concessionary Travel Scheme, the statutory scheme is supplemented by the 24/7 scheme which enables people with disabilities to travel to work, training and day care at any time.

7.6 In addition to procuring specific services the ITT also aims to maximise the awareness of all transport services and encourage people to travel as independently as possible. This includes reducing unnecessary car journeys and promoting walking and cycling for home to school journeys.

7.7 In preparing the Travel Strategy the ITT contacted local members and offered them the opportunity to provide priorities for their specific wards and also for the wider area. The priorities in Appendix 1 summarise the information provided by the members who engaged directly with the process. There is now a further opportunity for the Local Committee to provide input to enable the Strategy to have a local flavour. It is also proposed to engage with Parish and Town Councils as well as the Third Sector Network. A range of stakeholder meetings will be held between July and September 2013 with the Strategy going to Cabinet in November 2013. The priorities

7.8 In respect of providing a focus for the improvement of access opportunities in the Carlisle area there needs to be recognition of the need for people from the area to travel both within the County but also to other areas. In delivering the priorities it is important that the Area Plan incorporates the same priorities after they have been approved. Rail Travel

7.9 Developments at Rail stations are part of a programme of preparing Station Development Plans with Train operators and Network Rail. The West Coast mainline is the responsibility of the Department for Transport with Virgin. It is anticipated that there should be a decision regarding the frequency of the service in May.

7.10 Funding is currently being sought by the Tyne Valley Rail Partnership to enable a feasibility study to be undertaken into the viability of station reopening at Gilsland. Bus Travel

7.11 The diversion to Moat is funded by Parish Council contributions until July 2014. Services between Longtown and Carlisle are currently provided commercially by Stagecoach.

Page 61

Access to Health Services

7.12 The majority of the bus services in Carlisle are provided commercially. In responding to the wider issue of access to health the ITT will be working with a range of agencies, including Health to determine the most appropriate way forward. It will then be possible either to work with bus operators or find other solutions to ensure that people are able to access health services. The County Council currently supports a Dial a Ride service within the city for those people who unable, due to disability, to travel on scheduled bus services. Travel for Community and Community Groups

7.13 The Integrated Transport team will be actively promoting a range of community transport solutions in a number of ways including articles in parish newsletters, drop in sessions and contacting community groups. There will be ongoing activity to reach more volunteer drivers and coordinators of car schemes. In respect of the community buses owned by the County Council these will be used to their maximum potential provided volunteer drivers are recruited. There are currently ten community buses in the Carlisle area available for group hire through Cumbria Community Transport and it is intended through the Community Wheels scheme to maximise the use of community transport vehicles. Travel for young people

7.14 The Integrated Transport team will be working closely with young people through the youth council and other mechanisms to identify where transport is required and, where possible, facilitate solutions.

7.15 There are opportunities by using smartcard technology to provide reduced fares for young people for particular activities. There would be a need for funding to be allocated to provide the difference between the fares currently charged and the reduced fares. Active Travel

7.16 The ITT will be promoting sustainable transport options and in particular measures to encourage people to cycle rather than drive within the city. Travel information

7.17 The intention is to have information on bus services at all bus stops, however, this

will be subject to future resources. The ITT will be working with commercial operators to ensure that the information available to public is clear and easy to understand.

8.0 OPTIONS

8.1 This report provides an update on the work undertaken in respect of the Travel Strategy. Members have the opportunity to delete or add to any of the priorities set out in Appendix 1.

Page 62

9.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

9.1 There are no direct resource implications for Local Committee from approving the recommendation. However, by agreeing the broad principles outlined by the report this will impact on future proposals that could have implications for Council and Local Committee budgets. Comment PH 18-2-13

10.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

10.1 There are no direct legal implications arising from this report. MS 19-2-13

11.0 CONCLUSION

11.1 It is anticipated that the work to develop the Travel Strategy provides an opportunity for the services provided by the Integrated Transport Team to be more locally focussed. The priorities in the Travel Strategy need to be closely aligned with the relevant Area Plan.

Andrew Moss Assistant Director - Environment

13 February 2013 APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Local Member Priorities Electoral Division(s): All in Carlisle

* Please remove whichever option is not applicable

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? Yes

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

Yes

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Page 63

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

N/A

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? N/A

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the

expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and the Head of Member Services has obtained the necessary approvals.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] No previous relevant decisions CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny BACKGROUND PAPERS No background papers. Contact: Cheryl Cowperthwaite: Telephone No 01228 226757 [email protected]

Page 64

Appendix 3.1

Travel Strategy – Carlisle Local Committee Priorities Rail Travel (1) Carlisle station to be promoted as a key connection and as a future high speed rail

link (2) The reinstatement of the platform at Gilsland Station

Bus travel (3) Continue to secure local funding to maintain the Service 127 bus link to Moat

Access to Health Services (4) Improvements in bus routes to facilitate easier access to GP surgeries in

Carlisle Travel for communities and community groups (5) Wider promotion of community transport options through local notice boards

and Parish magazines Travel for young people (6) More affordable transport for post 16 young people travelling to local services

and social activities, particularly in the rural areas (7) Improved access in the evenings for young people into Brampton from

remote villages (8) More engagement with young people to establish their access needs through

youth centres and groups

Active Travel (9) More bike racks in Carlisle Town centre and other measures to encourage

cycling Travel information (9) Bus timetable information to be available at all bus-stops and made easier for

the public to understand

Page 65

Page 66

Appendix 4

CARLISLE HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP

Meeting date: 28 February 2013

From: Assistant Director – Highways and Transport

BUS PANEL, SHADYGROVE ROAD, CARLISLE

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 On 31st July 2012 a Bus Panel was held at 9 Shadygrove Road, Carlisle, at the request of Councillor Stockdale, to discuss whether to relocate the bus stop currently outside the property. Councillor Stockdale suggested this would stop the resident having issues with anti social behaviour which has subsequently been identified as specifically litter being dropped in her garden. There was also a reference to traffic congestion issues at the existing stop.

1.2 The proposed new location is a lay-by, currently used for car parking, outside the car park of the Carlisle West Sure Start Children’s Centre further along Shadygrove Road.

1.3 The new Service Procedure SBS SP5 for a request for new bus stop infrastructure was followed, including full consultation with all interested parties.

1.4 As the recommendation not to approve the request was contrary to the local member’s views, an additional meeting took place on 15 January 2013 between the Integrated Transport Manager, Councillor Stockdale and Councillor Weber. As no agreement could be reached a report has been prepared for the Carlisle Highways & Transport Working Group in accordance with the procedure..

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 No significant planning or equality implications have been identified at this stage.

Page 67

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 It is recommended that the bus stop currently outside 9 Shadygrove Road, Carlisle, remains in its current location.

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 The relocation request was made by Councillor Stockdale on behalf of a local resident who had complained of anti social behaviour at the stop. This was subsequently found to be a complaint regarding litter in her garden.

4.2 At the Bus Panel attended by Councillor Stockdale, Area Highways, and the Bus Infrastructure Officer, Councillor Stockdale said it was also an opportunity to look at re-locating the stop to a lay-by, as buses have to stop in the road at the current location. Delivery trucks for the shop nearby can be parked up causing congestion at these times.

4.3 Area Highways consider that there are no specific highway reasons to move the existing stop, for example no traffic safety issues, no road layout changes necessitating a move etc, but at the same time there is no objection to the proposed site on highways grounds.

4.4 The proposed lay-by would take the buses off the road, however it would need to be reconfigured into a bus stop lay-by. This would involve realigning the pavement, making good the road surface, installing a new bus stop pole and flag, and bus clearway markings. An estimated cost of the work required is £3,840 which includes a sum for unforeseen work, but assumes no service alterations are required. Consultation would also have to be carried out by Area Highways for a clearway, this would take four weeks.

4.5 Councillor Stockdale said that he could provide some of the cost of the work from his member revenue scheme budget in 12/13, which can be carried forward to 13/14, but the remainder would have to be found from elsewhere. There is no budget available from the Bus Infrastructure capital budget.

4.6 Appendix 1 shows the locations. The proposed location (C) is 94m further along and downhill from the existing stop (B), heading away from the main centre of local population, and would be 237m from the previous stop on Orton Road (A). The proposed location (C) is 107m from the next stop at the park (D).

Page 68

4.7 Consultation followed the Bus Panel meeting and the following comments were received.

4.8 The Police said they are unaware of any reports of disorder relating to the bus stop but also had no concerns about the proposed new site.

4.9 The General Manager/Community and Family Support Workers at Livingwell Trust opposite the lay-by, prefer the lay-by remaining as it is regarding it as a safer stopping place.

4.10 Carlisle West Sure Start Children’s Centre have expressed a number of concerns about the proposed site outside their carpark on behalf of 12 members of staff. The main concern is about the safety of children coming in and out of the car park entrance directly next to the proposed lay-by. They consider there is a danger of them getting hit by a bus, and the safety of bus passengers crossing the car park entrance immediately after exiting a bus. Other concerns are that the entrance to the car park is very narrow so with a bus in the lay-by, entrance and exit from the car park could be hindered and a view of the road obscured. The car park is a recycling site as well as being used by many customers of the centre. It is felt that the loss of this parking provision at the lay-by may cause nearby residents to complain if vehicles are parked outside their houses instead. Finally they said that in the winter, the path from where the bus stop is now, to where the proposed bus stop would be, gets extremely slippery, and questioned whether this would be a hazard to elderly people using the bus stop. (See however para 4.3)

4.11 One resident suggested that a relocation of 100m may be too far for older people as well as an inconvenience to people who use the stop. She was aware of litter issues in the general area but did not think a relocation would make any difference to the litter problem. She suggested that a butt bin for cigarette butts could be added to the bus stop pole.

4.12 Stagecoach said they could not see any benefit in the proposal. The stop is a well established and quite frequently used stop and the disruption of moving would not be beneficial to passengers. Reays said the stop could be moved further down as the stop outside number 9 is quite close to the one round the corner on Orton Rd. Summary

4.13 There are many bus stops across the county outside homes, where litter problems will exist, but the cost of relocating all these stops is prohibitive. The associated traffic congestion issues at this stop are not considered as significant by Area Highways.

4.14 The Police have no reports of anti social behaviour at the stop.

4.15 There is opposition for the relocation from the organisation next door to the proposed new location.

Page 69

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 The Highways & Transport Working Group can recommend to Carlisle Local Committee that no further action is taken in relation to this matter and that the bus stop remains where it is.

5.2 The Highways & Transport Working Group can recommend to Carlisle Local Committee that the bus stop is relocated to the proposed location at an estimated cost of £3,840. If any service alterations were required and this cost would rise, a further report would have to be sent to the Highways & Transport Working Group to approve additional funding.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 Approval of the proposed recommendation would have no resource implications as the matter would then be closed.

6.2 Should Members decide to relocate the bus stop then the estimated cost of £3,840 would be part funded from Councillor Stockdale’s member revenue scheme budget, but no other funding source has been identified at this stage. PH.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 There are no direct legal implications in this Report. KB.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 There is no substantive reason to move the location of the bus stop and there is known opposition to the new site and potential opposition from bus users, as well as a significant cost implication.

8.2 A relocation of this stop is not a priority and it should remain in its existing location.

Andrew Moss Assistant Director – Highways and Transportation

14 February 2013 APPENDICES Appendix 1-Location plan Electoral Division(s): Belle Vue

Page 70

Executive Decision No

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

N/A

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? N/A

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the

expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and necessary approvals have been obtained.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] No previous relevant decisions. CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny. BACKGROUND PAPERS None. REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Denene Kerr, Bus Infrastructure Officer, Tel: 01228 226434 Email: [email protected]

Page 71

Page 72

Appendix 5

CARLISLE HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP

Meeting date: 28th February 2013

From: Assistant Director- Highways & Transport

CARLISLE PARKING TASK GROUP UPDATE

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report sets out to advise The Working Group of the findings of the Carlisle Parking Task and Finish group which was established to develop an assessment process to establish the most appropriate parking restriction for any street, to ensure Carlisle parking is consistent and fit for purpose. A flow diagram and parking demand criteria to help decision making have been developed and agreed by the Task group.

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 The development of a parking strategy will aid the council to work towards its Council Plan priorities, which are

Ø challenging poverty in all its forms;

Ø ensuring that the most vulnerable people in our communities receive the support they need; and

Ø improving the chances in life of the most disadvantaged in Cumbria.

The parking strategy will also be an important factor in ensuring that the County Council meets its Local Transport Plan 3 aims, in particular those to:

• Reduce the impact of through traffic in the city centre

• To promote and encourage the use of sustainable transport

• To provide adequate and accessible parking.

Page 73

2.2 At present no equality impact assessment has been carried out as this report is informing The Group of a strategy for parking in Carlisle. EIA impacts will be fully considered when the process is undertaken for the Carlisle parking zones. It should be noted that any change to the existing parking regime will be subject to informal and statutory consultation.

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 The Group are asked to recommend to Local Committee that they note the Task Groups findings regarding Parking Demand Generators and their associated parking demands. Also that Local Committee agree to adopt the parking demand criteria and the process to establish appropriate parking restrictions, as set out in the flow diagram.

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 At its meeting in December 2011 Carlisle Local Committee agreed to commence work to carry out a comprehensive review of its on street parking restrictions throughout the district. This has been brought about due to the fact that the existing parking restriction order was made in 2001, and has been varied over 40 times making it an unwieldy document, and the fact that the County Council is in the process of introducing Parkmap, which is a software package for managing traffic restrictions.

4.2 As a result it was established that a new approach to parking assessment for Carlisle is required to assist in making Traffic Regulation Orders more manageable through the preparation of a consolidation order and to enable the use of the software package Parkmap.

4.3 This approach aims to ensure that Carlisle’s parking is consistent and fit for purpose. This will help Enforcement Officers when enforcing parking restrictions. It will also help drivers by providing a uniform approach to restrictions which would assist them to make good decisions when considering parking.

4.4 Through the investigation and analysis of the beat survey and questionnaire surveys, the complex nature of the parking issues has been highlighted. This has further emphasised the need for a clear parking strategy to ensure consistency across the city and over time.

4.5 A flow diagram has been developed to set out the proposed process for identifying the best way to manage conflicts between parking demand generators within an area and establish the most appropriate parking restriction. This is included in Appendix one and the process isdetailed below.

(a) To aid the development of the parking strategy the Task and Finish group have identified and agreed eight parking demand generators (PDG). These include services such as Hospitals and Schools, business sites, retail areas, residential, students, leisure, and industrial sites. These are detailed in the table in Appendix two. The potential parking demands created from the individual PDG and the varied services within

Page 74

them have also been identified. These are also detailed in the table in Appendix two.

(b) To assess and determine the scale of the parking demands operating in an area a set of criteria has been developed, provided in Appendix three. These criteria help assess the level of conflict caused by the PDGs. There is a range of data collection methods that can be used at this stage in the assessment to help establish demand and occupancy of the on street parking. These range from short, subjective, site visits to a full, objective, parking beat surveys.

(c) Once the nature of the conflict has been identified the next stage is to attempt to manage it. It has been suggested that all conflicts can be managed by the application of one of six restriction types; prohibition, permit holders parking, time restricted waiting with exemptions, time restricted waiting, planning restrictions or investigating improving public realm in areas that require a more sensitive approach.

(d) The final stage considers if the proposed parking restriction is in keeping with the current zone restrictions, provided in Appendix four. If it is in keeping the appropriate restriction can be applied, otherwise a justification for a change to the restrictions used within the Zone should be made.

4.6 This parking restriction process has been developed to allow the assessment of any street fairly and consistently whilst enabling reassessment should circumstances alter over time.

4.7 It is likely that a result of this process would be smaller parking zones that more closely meet the needs of the area under consideration.

4.8 The process will be used during 2013/14 to commence the comprehensive review of restrictions noted in paragraph 4.1.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 The Highways and Transport Working Group recommends to Local Committee that they adopt the parking demand criteria and process to establish appropriate parking restrictions. The process has been developed with agreement from the Carlisle Parking Task and Finish Group to enable the assessment of the most appropriate parking restriction on any street in Carlisle consistently and allowing for reassessment to take into account changes over time.

5.2 The Highways and Transport Working Group recommend to Local Committee to leave the parking in Carlisle as it is, treating individual requests on a case by case basis. This approach will continue to be inefficient and potentially ineffective.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 No financial implications have been identified at this stage.

Page 75

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 There are no direct legal implications at this stage. If the Working Group are minded to approve the Recommendation to Local Committee, then further Reports will be taken back to both the Working Group and Local Committee setting out the legal implications of each stage (if applicable).

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 This report aims to advise to The Group as to the findings of the Carlisle Parking Task and Finish Group regarding the development of a new approach to parking assessment for Carlisle.

8.2 A process has been developed to help establish the most appropriate parking restriction for a street with associated parking demand criteria. It is recommended that the Local Committee approve the process and criteria for adoption.

8.3 The development of this parking assessment process draws the Carlisle Parking Task and Finish Group to close. Thank you to the members of the group for their attendance and input in to the meetings.

Andrew Moss Assistant Director- Highways and Transportation

February 2013 APPENDICES Appendix 1- Flow diagram Appendix 2- Parking Demand Generators spreadsheet Appendix 3- Criteria Appendix 4- Current zone restrictions Electoral Division(s): All

* Please remove whichever option is not applicable

Executive Decision No*

Key Decision No*

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N N/A*

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No*

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant N/A*

Page 76

Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No*

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

N/A*

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? N/A*

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the

expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and necessary approvals have been obtained.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] Carlisle Local Committee 21st December 2011 Highways Working Group 17th April 2012 Carlisle Local Committee 9th May 2012 Highways Working Group 27th June 2012 Carlisle Local Committee 30th July 2012 Highways Working Group 14th August 2012 Carlisle local Committee 14th September 2012 CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny BACKGROUND PAPERS No background papers REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Abigail Dodds Tel; 01228 221767 Email: [email protected]

Page 77

Page 78

Appendix 5.2 - Carlisle Parking Review - Parking Demand Generators

Demand

Generator Parking Demand Existing Parking Measures Restriction Types Provider

A Retail

On Street very short term for

Loading etc

Very short term controlled on

street parking

Time restricted

waiting County CC

Medium/Long term parking

for employees/shoppers

Off St free Parking at site or in

controlled parking areas Owner/City CC

Regular Events

On Street adjacent to

leisure/social venues

Time restricted

waiting County CC

B Business Employees - Long Term

On Site provision within

business premises Owner

Employees- Short Term

On Site provision within

business premises or short

term controlled on St Parking

Time restricted

waiting Owner/County CC

Visitors Short Term

On Site provision within

business premises or short

term controlled on St Parking

Time restricted

waiting Owner/County CC

Page 79

C

Residential type a

Low Density

Residential most

properties have

adequate off st

parking

Long term generally

overnight None

Time Restricted

waiting with

exemption Owner

Visitors Short Term None

Time Restricted

waiting with

exemption Owner/County CC

Residential type b

High Density

Residential little or

no private off st

parking

Long term generally

overnight

Controlled Short term parking

with residents exemption

Time Restricted

waiting with

exemption County CC

Visitors Short Term

Controlled Short term parking

with visitors permits

Time Restricted

waiting with

exemption County CC

with Limited

choice within zone

Long term generally

overnight

Controlled Short term parking

with residents exemption

Permit Holders

parking

Visitors Short Term

Controlled Short term parking

with visitors permits

Time Restricted

waiting with

exemption

D Hospitals Employees - Long Term

On Site provision within

business premises Owner

Visitors Short Term

On Site provision within

business premises or short

term controlled on St Parking

Time restricted

waiting Owner/County CC

E Industrial Employees - Long Term

On Site provision within

business premises Owner

Page 80

Visitors Short Term

On Site provision within

business premises or short

term controlled on St Parking

Time restricted

waiting Owner/County CC

F Schools Employees - Long Term

On Site provision within

business premises Owner

Visitors Short Term

On Site provision within

business premises or short

term controlled on St Parking

Time restricted

waiting Owner/County CC

G Students Residential

Controlled Short term parking

with residents exemption

Time Restricted

waiting with

exemption County CC

Day trips

On Site provision within

business premises or short

term controlled on St Parking

Time restricted

waiting County CC

H Leisure Employees - Long Term

On Site provision within

business premises owner

Medium Term

Controlled short term on

street or off street

Time restricted

waiting County Cc/City

Definitions

Long Term Parking requirement in excess of 6hrs

Medium Term Parking Requirement 2 to 6 Hrs

Short Term Parking requirement 1 to 2 Hrs

very Short Term Parking requirement 30mins or less

Page 81

Page 82

Appendix 5.3

Issues to be considered when assessing the scale of parking conflicts

• Number of services nearby

• Type of services

• Distance to services on foot

• Length of time required to attend service

• Number of residential properties

• Availability of off street parking

• Indication of the level of demand

• Seasonal variations e.g school terms

• Days of the week that services operate

• Times of the day that services operate

• Proximity to alternative travel options

Note: Acceptable walking distances will be taken from the IHT guidelines for Proving Journeys on Foot

Page 83

Page 84

Appendix 5.4

Existing Parking Zone Descriptions Zone A

• It is currently subject to a two hour restriction.

• It is approximately between 500m and 800m from the city centre so is not a desirable distance to walk to the city centre, this suggesting a two hour restriction.

• Restrictions are required to provide turnover to enable residents to park amongst competition from schools, the college and businesses such as Armstrong Watson.

• Restrictions are operational mon- fri 8am to 8pm and sat 8-6pm.

• Restrictions up to 8pm are required due to night classes and leisure centre use.

Zone B

• Subject to a 2 hour restriction.

• The whole zone is 800m or further from the city centre, this is not a desirable distance to walk for retail, justifying the two hour limit.

• Time restrictions are required to provide turn over due to conflicts between residents, businesses and the college. There are services in the area such as dentists and doctors that require longer than an hour for appointments.

• Off Street parking is provided nearby (Tait Street) for long term visits.

• Restrictions- Monday to friday 8am- 8pm. 8pm required due to proximity to Botchergate, evening entertain and restaurants and the cinema. Sat 8-6pm.

Page 85

Zone C

• The only full zone subject to an hour restriction.

• The majority of the zone is within 450m from the city centre. The furthest point is Tait Street which 750m. This makes this zone within a reasonable walking distance from the city centre requiring an hour restriction to improve turn over.

• Zone C is close to lots of services- mainly retail and business.

• It is also close to most major car parks for longer duration stays. The bus station is also close by as an alterative transport choice.

• There are fewer residential properties than other areas but need turnover for business users and as there is more competition for spaces for the residents.

• Restrictions operating Monday to Saturday 830am- 6pm.

• Earlier finish of the restriction as the main demand generator is business. Zone D

• Subject to a 2 hour restriction.

• The zone is between 1.1km and 1.9km from the city centre so is not a desirable distance for shoppers. Hence two hour restrictions. Is close enough to attract employees if no restrictions applied.

• Mainly residential demands now industry has reduced in the area. There have been recent developments in student housing but no parking is provided for them.

• There is also some areas of retail and business, mainly on Denton Street. Turnover is required to provide for these users and residents. A lot of the properties in this area are terraces without off street parking.

• There are some resident only areas in D.

• Restrictions- Monday to Friday 8am- 8pm and Saturday 8am to 6pm.

Page 86

Zone E

• Subject to a 2 hour restriction on most streets with 1 hour on five streets near the hospital and 20min outside the spar shop.

• High numbers of residents require turn over and restrictions due to the hospital which is a large TDG.

• Restrictions- Monday to Friday 8am- 8pm and Saturday 8am to 6pm.

• 8pm restrictions required due to hospital late visiting hours. Zone F

• Subject to a 2 hour restriction.

• This is provided due to the proximity of this zone to the city centre for people parking for work.

• The zone is too far to be desirable for walking for retail in the city centre.

• There are businesses on Stanwix bank which require turnover along with residents in the area.

• Restrictions- Monday to Friday 8am- 8pm and Saturday 8am to 6pm. Zone H

• Subject to a 2 hour restriction.

• This zone is greatly affected by the presence of the football club. Turnover is required for residents due to football and school parking in the area.

• Distance from the city centre prevents parking for retail purposes- making 2 hour parking is appropriate.

• Restrictions- Monday to Friday 8am- 8pm and Saturday 8am to 6pm. Zone Map Key Zone A- Yellow Zone B- Orange Zone C- Dark purple Zone D- Blue Zone E-Pink Zone F- Brown Zone- light purple

Page 87

Page 88

Appendix 5.5

Page 89

Page 90

Appendix 6

CARLISLE HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP

Meeting date: 28 February 2013

From: Assistant Director – Highways and Transportation

CARLISLE SPEED LIMIT REVIEW 2013-14

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report advises the Working Group of the next tranche of speed limits and seeks approval to proceed to statutory consultation and implementation of these proposals.

1.2 A previous report, presented to the Carlisle Local Committee in November 2011, detailed a list of A & B roads (along with a number of C class and unclassified roads which were also identified in the report of June 2007), with conclusions for each site resulting from site investigation works.

1.3 The sites on the list for which it was determined that further investigation/consultation was required were to form the basis of introducing new speed limits as part of the Capital programme over the succeeding years.

1.4 The first tranche of changes approved by Carlisle Local Committee in 2012-13 were on the A7 (J44 to Blackford and at Longtown).

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 Traffic authorities are required to keep speed limits under review. Existing Cumbria County Council policies on speed and speed limits commits the County Council to establishing criteria for setting mandatory speed limits.

2.2 The Cumbria Local Transport Plan sets a number of objectives for transport. The review of speed limits will contribute to the achievement a number of these objectives relating to safety related targets and those for sustainable travel.

Page 91

2.3 No significant equality implications have been identified at this stage. The statutory consultation processes for Traffic Regulation Orders provide a mechanism to address any such perceived issues.

3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

3.1 That the Highways and Transport Working Group recommends to the Carlisle Local Committee to proceed to statutory consultation on the proposals detailed below. These proposals have been selected due to the average traffic flow, the road environment and the road function:

• to introduce a 40mph speed limit on the A6071 through the village of Newtown for a distance of approximately 300m;

• to introduce a 30mph speed limit on the U1098 through Newtown for a distance of approximately 700m;

• to introduce a 40mph speed limit on the B6264 Brampton Old Road for a distance of approximately 770m;

• to extend the 30mph speed limit on the B6264 Brampton Old Road by a distance of approximately 90m in an outbound direction.

3.2 Any Representations received will be reported back through the Local

Committee process for determination. However, in the absence of any such representations, the Working Group is asked to recommend that Local Committee resolve that the Traffic Regulation Orders be made as advertised having taken into consideration the matters contained in Section 122(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 which are more specifically referred to at paragraph 7.2 of this Report.

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 The locations identified in the Appendix were assessed using the DfT criteria along with accident statistics and recorded mean speeds.

4.2 The initial recommendations made in the earlier report were based on the criteria defined in DfT Circular 01/2006. This has recently been superceded by a revised DfT Circular 01/2013 Setting Local Speed Limits, which incorporates recent changes that create more flexibility to implement 20mph limits and zones, and sets out a process for applications to the DfT for further rural 40mph zones. However, the principles applied from the earlier Circular 01/2006 still apply in the revised Circular 01/2013 and so there is no requirement to reassess these earlier investigations.

4.3 For completeness Appendix 1 includes all the schemes that have been assessed as part of this process, but has been edited to score out those proposals for which the outcome was either determined and agreed to be ‘No change to existing limit’ or where works have subsequently been carried out (J44 to Blackford crossroads 50mph; Longtown 30mph extension; and Parkhouse Road to Crindledyke 30/40mph).

Page 92

4.4 The schemes proposed to be progressed during the financial year 2013-14

are detailed below. These have been selected for the following reasons:

• Road function;

• Road geometry and engineering;

• Road environment.

(a) A6071 NEWTOWN - INTRODUCTION OF A 40 MPH LIMIT (estimated cost £6000.00); The A6071 is a strategic through road which serves as a connecting route between the A69 and A7. It also dissects the community of Newtown and lowering the speed limit would benefit not only residents but also users of the National Trail Hadrian’s Wall Walk. Furthermore the restricted visibility for traffic exiting the U1098 onto the A6071 combined with the challenging topography and road alignment would also benefit all road users, allowing drivers additional time to assess the road/traffic. Additional investigations were undertaken during 2012-13 (reported to HTWG 14.8.12/CLC 14.9.2012) verified that the A6071 through Newtown did meet the criteria for a 40mph limit. The Local Committee further resolved that this scheme proceed in the 2013-14 financial year. The proposal also includes the introduction of a 30mph speed limit on the adjacent U1098 in Newtown, as this meets the density requirements to be classed as a village. These proposals are supported by the Parish Council. Furthermore, Connect Roads have no objection to a 40mph limit being introduced on this length of the A6071. The plan in Appendix II shows the lengths of road intended to be covered by the proposed speed limits.

(b) B6264 BRAMPTON OLD ROAD - INTRODUCTION OF a 40 MPH LIMIT (estimated costs £15000.00) The B6264 is one of the main arterial approach roads into Carlisle and the proposal is to introduce a 40mph speed limit from the motorway bridge, just before the access for Hadrian’s Camp travellers’ site. This meets the DfT criteria in respect of 40mph limits, in that the road is a high quality suburban road with little development but with good road width and layout and with buildings being set back from the road. The existing 30mph limit would be moved slightly further out of town, prior to the petrol station, to resolve an anomaly in that area (whereby vehicles could enter Carlisle by diverting off the B6264, through the petrol station grounds and then via Houghton Road, and so not pass the 30mph signs and therefore use this as an argument against any possible speeding convictions which may arise).

Page 93

The plan in Appendix III shows the lengths of road intended to be covered by the proposed speed limits.

4.5 The remaining sites would then be progressed in the next tranche of schemes

in the following financial years, depending upon budget allocations, these being:

• B6263 from Warwick Bridge to Holme House - Introduction of a 30mph limit This will require Roadlink’s agreement as it would also affect and require works to be undertaken on the A69. Engineering improvements have been carried out in the vicinity of Holme House and since completion of these, there have been no recorded incidents on the Collisions Management System in the three years from 2009 to 2012. It is suggested that this site be reassessed to ascertain if these improvements have resolved the accident issue. It should be noted that whilst the Police did support a 30mph limit here, this was prior to the completion of the engineering works, and the site does not meet the DfT criteria. Additionally, the revised criteria of Circular 01/2013 states that ‘speed limits should not be used to attempt to solve the problem of isolated hazards, for exampleMreduced visibility such as at a bendMOther measures such as warning signsMcarriageway markingsMare likely to be more effective.’

• B5299 from existing 40mph (Cummersdale) to Peter Lane - Extension of existing 40mph limit. To be met by the developers through the Planning process.

• B6318 Roadhead - Introduction of a 30 mph limit through the village.

• U1133 –Barras Lane to Barras Brow - Extension of the 30mph limit from Station Road to Barras Brow.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 The Highways and Transport Working Group can recommend to Local Committee that statutory consultation commences on the two sites identified above with a view to progressing to implementation during 2013-14, should the statutory consultation be supported and no objections be received. If objections are received then a further Report will be taken back to Local Committee for their determination.

5.2 The Highways and Transport Working Group can recommend to Local Committee that the B6263 from Warwick Bridge to Holme House is

Page 94

reassessed to determine if a reduction in the speed limit is still appropriate at this location.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 The estimated cost of the recommended works for the two sites for which approval to implement in 2013-14 is £25000.00. This includes for the physical works, design, consultation and advertising. These costs can be met from the Capital Improvements budget in 2013-14

6.2 There will be ongoing maintenance costs for the works on the B6264 and U1098: sign maintenance, £600.00 per year allowing for a 20 year life span; road markings £200.00 per year allowing for 10 year life span. Costs are based on 2011-12 rates and are not adjusted for inflation. The ongoing maintenance costs will assigned to the Local Committee Revenue Budget.

6.3 Members should be aware that A6071 is the responsibility of the Connect/ Balfour Beattie partnership. However, works on this road would still require funding from Cumbria County Council It should be noted that any change to the Connect Roads network should be advised to them via the Contract Manager as they will require a Change Notice.

6.4 The likely commuted sums to consider for future routine & cyclic maintenance for the A6071 Newtown scheme along with the associated change order for Connect Roads are estimated to be £200/year which is a reasonable estimate of the lifecycle costs.

6.5 Members should note that this annual cost will be payable to Connect Roads for the life of the CNDR PFI Contract and will increase by the increase in the retail price index each year, and that it will need to be accounted for in future annual Revenue budgets.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 There are no legal implications at this stage but Local Committee, in deciding whether to implement the restrictions detailed in paragraph 3 of this Report will need to take into take into consideration the matters contained in Section 122(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 which are more specifically referred to at paragraph 7.2 of this Report. For the reason specified at section 1(1)(a) of the 1984 Act, namely for avoiding danger to persons or other traffic using the road or for preventing the likelihood of any such danger arising.

Page 95

7.2 Under Section 122(2), the matters which Local Committee must take into account in exercising that duty are: -

(a) the desirability of securing and maintaining reasonable access to premises;

(b) the effect on amenities of an area; (c) the national air quality strategy prepared under section 80 of the

Environment Act 1995; (d) the importance of facilitating the passage of public service vehicles and

of securing the safety and convenience of persons using or desiring to use such vehicles; and

(e) any other matters appearing to the authority to be relevant.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 Appendix I was used as the basis of a prioritised list that was brought before the Highways Working Group/Local Committee as part of the 20012/13 Capital Program Report.

8.2 This same Appendix is now being used to identify the schemes to be implemented during 2013-14, with the costs being met from Capital Highways Budget.

8.3 Therefore this report advises the Working Group of the proposals to implement the introduction of revised speed limits on the A6071/U1098 and B6264.

8.4 The results of these consultations, should there be representations against the proposals, will be reported back to the Highways and Transport Working Group and Local Committee in due course for further consideration.

8.5 Should there be no representations received against these proposals however, the recommendation should be to implement the speed limits on the A6071/U1098 (Newtown) and B6264 (Brampton Old Road) as consulted upon.

Andrew Moss Assistant Director - Highways and Transportation February 2013 APPENDICES Appendix I – spreadsheet detailing data for each road Appendix II – plan showing intended revised speed limits A6071/U1098 Newtown Appendix III – plan showing the revised speed limits B6264 Electoral Division: Brampton & Gilsland; Stanwix & Irthington;

Page 96

Executive Decision (Not at Group) Yes

Key Decision No*

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A*

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No*

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A*

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No*

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

N/A*

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? ` N/A*

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the

expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and the Head of Member Services and Scrutiny has obtained the necessary approvals.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] Carlisle Local Committee: 21st June 2007/ 1st November 2011/ 14th September 2012 Highways & Transport Working Group: 6th June 2007/ 10th October 2011/ 14th August 2012 CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny. BACKGROUND PAPERS DfT Circular 01/2006 and Circular 01/2013 REPORT AUTHOR Sarah Steel – Traffic Management Officer Contact: S Steel 01228 221767 Email: [email protected] .

Page 97

Page 98

Speed Assessment Review April 08

Road Type Settlement Details Recommendation

DfT 01/06 min criteria 600m 20+

Road Number Locations Ward Upper Lower Length

No. of houses VH Sch Church Other Traffic flow

Mean speed mph

Injury Accidents

Budget costs excluding TRO consultation & traffic management

B6318 Roadhead Longtown & Bewcastle

* 934m 30+ yes - - 313 per day 36.6 No recorded injury accidents

30 MPH LIMIT BE INTRODUCED - Police support. Roadhead meets the DfT criteria for classification as a village and so a 30mph limit would be the appropriate recommendation.

8no 30/NSL @£500.00 3 repeaters@300=£5000.00

B6318 Triermain Castle to Lees Hill Junc

Brampton & Gilsland

650m 8 - - - 323 per day 32.1 No recorded injury accidents

NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMIT- mean speed is already low due to road topograph. There would be no benefit in reducing accidents stats by changing the speed limit as there are no recorded accidents along this length. The frontage requirements are not met and traffic volumne is low. Altering the limit would lead to more sign clutter in a rural area, plus increased future maintenance costs for repair.

A6071 Newtown Stanwix & Irthington/ Brampton & Gilsland

* 255m 10 Hall - - 1906 per day Reassessed 2012 2104 per day

46 Reassessed 2012 36.5mph

No recorded injury accidents

40MPH LIMIT BE INTRODUCED - Newtown does not meet the length or frontage requirements of DfT01/06 , but the mean speed recorded indicates that a 40mph limit would be approriate. The Police have stated that they would support a 40 limit. The road topography and alignment, as well as the porr visibility for traffic exiting from the U road onto the A6071 further supports this. At the same time a 30mph to be introdcued through Newtown itself

Estimate £6000.00

A6071 Smithfield Longtown & Bewcastle/ Stanwix & Irthington

* 950m 21 - - - Plus School & housing just off A6071

1952 per day

38.5 1 slight NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMIT as DfT criteria is met for classification as a village.Consideration should be given introducing Engineering measures to reduce mean speed and so achieve current posted limit. In meantime, Police to carry out speed schecks a sposted limit being exceeded.information from Police suggests Smithfield residents supports the existing 30 mph limit as do local police.

No costs apportioned at this time for Engineering measures.

B6264 Brampton Old Road

Stanwix & Irthington

* 882m 38 - - - travellers camp

3806 per day

46 No recorded injury accidents

40MPH LIMIT TO BE INTRODUCED FROM MOTORWAY BRIDGE TO EXISTING 30 LIMIT,move existing 30 out slightly in a NE direction, leave remainder from bridge to RAB as is.

30's to move out plus elec work £6000 new 40's also lit £6000.00plus repeaters 4 no approx £240=£12240.00. lining to remove and lay new £2700.00 total £15000.00

B6263 Extend 40 @ Warwick Bridge

Wetheral * 450m 2 - - - no 1704 per day

33 3 slight (plus 11 damage only)

RECOMMEND THAT A 30MPH LIMIT BE INTRODUCED. Whilst this length does not meet the DfT criteria, despite engineering works at this location (surface dressing, kerbing, new road markings and marker posts) accidents are still occuring.The Police support the introduction of a 30 limit here. Roadlink need to agree as the existing 30/40 limit on the A69 would need amended. Whilst a 40mph limit could be introduced here whic would tie in with the existing limit on the A69, this has not been recommended due to the low mean speed - a posted limit here of 40mph may actually lead to more accidents as some drivers will assume it is the speed that they can travel, regardless of the road layout.

£20,000.00 for 30mph/£4000.00 for 40mph lining to amend £1800 total £5800.00

B6263 Cumwhinton to Wetheral

Wetheral * 1386m 9 - - - - 2240 movements per day

38.5 No recorded injury accidents

NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMIT - Criteria not met in regard to frontages, there would be no benefit to reducing the accident data road topography keeps speed low.

Page 99

B5299 Morton 30 to Cummersdale road end (40 limit posted)

Dalston & Cummersdale

* 860 8 - - - cemetery & factory (all with good visibility)

9017 per day

37.6 1 no slight, 1 no serious

NO CHANGE TO EXISTING 40 MPH SPEED LIMIT - means speed supports this.

B5299 Cummersdale rd end to Peter Lane

Dalston & Cummersdale

* 560 11 - - - - 7937 per day

37.1 1 no slight EXTEND THE EXISTING 40MPH LIMIT FROM CUMMERSDALE ROAD END TO PETER LANE JUNCTION (not including junction)

Take down & reuse existing assembly where possible £800.00 lining to alter £1700 plus red surfacing to remove £4000.00 total £6500. TO BE MET BY DEVELOPER CONTRIBTIONS AS PART OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT SCHEME.

B5299 The Square Dalston & Cummersdale

* - - yes shops NO CHANGE. Leave at present due to ongoing discussions with Parish Council with regard to traffic management in this vicinity.

B5299 The Green to Dalston Bridge (leading to Walk Mill)

Dalston & Cummersdale

* 925 43 yes - yes - 5858 per day

33.7 1 no slight NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMIT - mean speeds suggest that 30 is appropriate limit. DfT criteria in regard to length & frontagers is met.

U1133 Station Road/ Barras Lane

Dalston & Cummersdale

* 550 1 - - - industrial estate

2836 per day

31.5 1 no slight EXTEND THE EXISTING 30MPH LIMIT TO BARRAS BROW - Whilst criteria not met in regard to property frontages and length, there are increased traffic movement due to developing industrial estate.

Take down & reuse existing assembly where possible £800.00 lining to alter £1700 allow for current to be lit so services to cut off £2000.00 total £4500.

7 from J44 to Harker/ or take to Blackford X roads

Longtown & Bewcastle

* 2385 15 - yes -adj

yes - adj - 9379 per day

49.6 10 slight, 3 serious, 1 fatal

INTRODUCE A 50MPH LIMIT FROM J44 TO BLACKFORD CROSS ROADS.Was originally to Harker but accidents on stretch to Blackford (incl fatal) plus complaints from frontagers about accessing their properties would suggest that its taken out to Blackford x roads. Consideration was given to having 2 seperate 50's but as they woudl be reasonably close together, its is more approriate to have one continual limit to avoid having too many chnages of limit in one stretch.

12no non illuminated 50/NSL@£500=£7000.00, 2 no illuminated @£7000plus repeaters 7no£1960=£16000.00. COMPLETED 2012-13 WITH CHANGE ORDER TO CONNECT ROADS.

A7 Longtown Longtown & Bewcastle

* 168 8 - - - - none taken No recorded injury accidents

EXTEND 30MPH LIMIT out to tie in with properties and commencement of town - Police support. Additional Engineering measures will be required to reinforce to drivers the recommended posted limit.

Move existing limit - £7000.00 plus road markings to amend/red surfacing to remove £4000.00 Total £11000.00.No cost apportioned at this time for Engineering measures (Police request). COMPLETED 2012-13 WITH CHANGE ORDER TO CONNECT ROADS.

A689 J44 to Linstock RAB - Brunstock side

Stanwix & Irthington

* 1390 1 - - - - 8433 per day

49 No recorded injury accidents

NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMIT. Police support this (existing 40mph at Houghton/Scaleby/Garden centre protects those junction movements) Reducing the limit here would make no savings in terms of accidents as none are recorded, plus the frontage criteria are not met.

A689 J44 to Linstock RAB -Harker Grange side

Stanwix & Irthington

* 1180 1 - - - - 11248 per day

51.4 No recorded injury accidents

NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMIT. Police support this (existing 40mph at Houghton/Scaleby/Garden centre protects those junction movements) Reducing the limit here would make no savings in terms of accidents as none are recorded, plus the frontage criteria are not met.

A689 Milton to Hallbankgate

Brampton & Gilsland

* 2200 5 - - - - 1609 per day

39.6 2 slight NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMIT - frontage criteria not met. A reduced limit would not bring about the required accident savings. Milton & Hallbankgate both have 30 limits. Road topography keeps speeds low. Police have no issues here and question that a reduced limit would make any difference.

A689 Hallbankgate to county boundary

Brampton & Gilsland

* 6590 34 - - - - 1040 per day

43.3 1 slight, 1 serious

NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMIT - frontage criteria not met (whilst 34 properties are detailed as fronting this length of 6.6km, they are in small settlements of less that 10 properties, dispersed along that length). A reduced limit would not bring about the required accident savings. Road topography keeps speeds low. Police have no issues here and question that a reduced limit would make any difference.

-

Page 100

C1015 Parkhouse Rd to Harker motorway bridge (NCR 7)

Longtown & Bewcastle

* 1438 6 - - - existing Crindledyke housing estate plus Kingmoor

Park

4391 per day

40.5 9slight, 1 serious EXISTING 30MPH LIMIT TO BE MOVED INBOUND TO TRUCK STOP THEN A NEW 40MPH LIMIT FROM THIS POINT (TIE IN WITH CNDR). However, it is recommended that a decision on this is deferred pending the outcome of ongoing Planning Applications (to ensure CCC is seen as being impartial) plus the CNDR works. (Consideration needs to be given as to where 40 limit would end.)

Existing signs and supplies to removed, new signs,post and supllies to erect 30/40 new signs and posts to erect 40/NSL, £6000 repeaters say 8@280£2240=£8500.00.COMPLETED 2011-12 AS PART OF CNDR WORK.

C2042 City boundary to Longburgh (NCR 72)

Longtown & Bewcastle

* 7571 in total

Defined villages

- - - Village hall, church in bounds of settlements so covered by existing 30 limit.

No survey data to date

No survey data to date

4 slight, 1 serious

NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMITS. All villages on this length have a 30mph speed limit already ie Kirkandrews on Eden, Monkhill, Burgh by Sands. Lengths in between are NSL with lack of frontage properties.

C1025 Brampton to Gilsland via Banks (NCR 72)

Brampton & Gilsland

10300 in total

* 10300 in total

Defined villages

- - - Village hall, church in bounds of settlements.

No survey data to date

No survey data to date

3 slight, 1 serious

NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMIT. Road similar in topography to B6318 Triermain so speeds already likely to be low. Frontage criteria not met. Road is rural in nature and reduction in speed unlikely to be supported by Police. This route is on line of a National Monument - Scheduled Monument Consent would be required for every post that would require to be placed (terminals & repeaters) at prohibitive costs. Also a proliferation of signs & posts in such a rural setting would be unsightly and costly to maintain.

C1014 Dalston Bridge End to J42 M6 (NCR 7)

Dalston & Cummersdale

* 7604 in total

Defined villages

- - - - No survey data to date

No survey data to date

27 slight, 5 serious, 1 fatal - Park Fauld & Brisco X roads being 'hot spots'

NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMITS. WOULD RECOMMEND THAT ROUTE ACTION STUDY IS UNDERTAKEN DUE TO THE HIGH VOLUME INJURY ACCIDENTS RECORDED, AS IT MAY BE THAT ENGINEERING MEASURES ARE REQUIRED AND THAT A SPEED LIMIT ALONE MAY NOT RESOLVE ISSUES. All villages on this length have 40mph limit orders ie Dalston & Durdar. Lengths in between are NSL with lack of frontage properties. Signing improvements were ordered for Brisco X roads and Park Fauld to deal with accident data as per CRASH Group.

C1016 Kingmoor to Rockcliffe (NCR 7)

Longtown & Bewcastle

* 3650 in total

9 - - - BSW timber yard

No survey data to date

No survey data to date

7 slight NO CHANGE TO EXISTING LIMIT due to CNDR works and Temporary orders

Notes:

Criteria for village speed limits as per DfT Traffic Advisory Limit 1/04.

In this circular a village is defined using simple criteria:

* 20 or more houses and;

*a minimum length of 600 metres.

Extra allowance may be made for key buildings such as church, shop, school if there are fewer than 20 houses.

01/2006 also states that the aim should be to align the local speed limit so that original mean speed driven on the road is at or below the new posted limit for that road.

Page 101

Page 102

Page 103

Appendix 7

CARLISLE HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP

Meeting date: 28 February 2013

From: Assistant Director- Highways and Transport

CRASH GROUP UPDATE – FEBRUARY 2013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This briefing note has been prepared to further update the Highway Working Group on issues that have been discussed at meetings of the CRASH Group since the last report which was presented in October 2012. The report details action that has taken place and advises on highway safety improvement schemes the CRASH Group would like the Local Committee to consider for future implementation.

2.0 RECOMMENDATION

2.1 The Highways Working Group is asked to recommend that the report is noted by the Local Committee.

3.0 BACKGROUND

3.1 The Carlisle and Eden CRASH (Casualty Reduction and Safer Highways) Group is part of a County wide multi agency group which meets bi-monthly to explore ways to improve road safety within the County. Using analysis of accident data combined with Police knowledge of driver trends the aim of the Group is to ensure that the potential for road traffic accidents is identified and measures are put in place to reduce the risk to road users. This pro-active approach has proved very successful, and the county’s accident rate has been consistently well below our target figures for the last few years.

3.2 There have been two meetings of The CRASH Group since the last briefing note was prepared, on the 27th November 2012 and on 15th January 2013. Accident statistics from each of these meetings is shown below. It can be seen from the data in the lower table that casualties for road traffic collisions

Page 104

has continued to show a year on year reduction further demonstrating the effectiveness of road safety initiatives such as CRASH.

Casualty Numbers per Month Casualty Numbers Year to date

Oct-11 Oct-12 Difference % Change 2011 2012 Difference % Change

KSI 1 5 5 No Calc 38 40 2 -6

Slight 37 18 -65 -31 300 230 -86 -29

Casualty Numbers per Month Casualty Numbers Year to date

Dec-11 Dec-12 Difference % Change 2011 2012 Difference

%

Change

KSI 11 1 -10 -91 50 45 -5 -10

Slight 39 28 -28 -33 368 303 -65 -18

3.3 The November meeting was primarily concerned with the upcoming drink drive campaign, and with an increase in reported accidents in and around the east Carlisle area. As a result the Police were intending to carry out some higher profile work in the area including greater use of hand held speed detection devices to address those areas where camera van deployment was not possible.

3.4 The January meeting considered the outcome of the drink drive campaign that has been reported in the press. The final figures are much the same as last year, with the highest number of positive breath tests being recorded in the early morning.

3.5 Appendix A provides details of the issues raised at the meetings sites and their current status. New issues were raised and these are shown at the bottom of the Appendix.

3.6 The Local Committee agreed to provide a budget allocation of £12,000 to address urgent issues that are raised by the group, as part of the 2012/13 Capital Budget. This budget is now more than fully committed and a recommendation to increase the funding by £3,000 for this element of the Minor Highways Budget was approved at the Local Committee at its meeting on 5th February 2013.

3.7 The Working Group is advised that there have been one request to carry out safety related improvement work in the area has come from the November meeting. That is to consider the introduction of a 30mph speed limit through Low Row village. A budget estimate of £5,000 has been made for this scheme and it is suggested that it be included in the Speed in Villages program for future consideration by the Group and Local Committee.

4.0 CONCLUSION

4.1 This briefing note updates the Group on the work of the CRASH Group and implications for the Local Committee that arise from that work.

Page 105

Andrew Moss

Assistant Director – Highways and Transport February 2013 APPENDICES Appendix A CRASH Issues January 2012 Electoral Division(s): All REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Kevin Crawley – Traffic Management Engineer Carlisle Tel 01228 673158 E-mail [email protected]

Page 106

Page 107

Appendix A CRASH Issues February 2013

Road No Road Details of issue Current position Estimated Cost

B5299/U1133 Carlisle Road/ Station Road, Dalston Road safety study

Scheme has been submitted for inclusion on County Council Cpaital Program £80,000

C1012/C1030 Hethersgill Cross Roads Resident safety concerns at junction Works partially Complete funded from MLSS budget £2,500

Etterby Scaur Footway Resident safety concerns regarding cyclists using the footway. Scheme complete funded from MLSS Budget £1,900

C1012 Houghton Village Traffic Calming issues Request from PC to improve Traffic calming

No issues identified by CRASH Group. Meeting has been held with the PC. Minor improvements now completed and funded from Minor Highways Improvements Speed in Villages Budget £2,000

C1015 Linstock Village Request for 20mph limit from PC

Road at back of green has been included in the t Speed limit TRO for 30mph limit which was approved by Local Committee in December. This work has now been ordered and wil be funded from the Minor Highways Improvments Speed in Villages Budget £200

B5307 Carlisle to Moorhouse Request for Double White Lines

Group did not identify any issues on this route. It was generally felt that Double white lines were not required. CCC to complete assessment 0

U1181 Eden Golf Club RTA golfer struck whilst crossing the road. Issue raised by parent through the media

Local Member has agreed to fund this from Member Allocation. Works to be ordered shortly £1,300

Greystone Road Carlisle Delivery parking blocking road at school times. Raised by Group member Site inspection at school starting time required £0

Issues Raised in July

A6071 William Howard School Concerns raised by parents regarding safety of Children Crossing road outside school

CCC to write to school to advise of concerns and ask school to ask pupils to take care. £0

C1026 North of Cumwhitton Concerns raised by Parish Council regading speed at hidden dip

CCC to contact Cumwhitton Parish Council - CRASH group are not convinced there is a need for slow markings both sides of the road, not sure people would take any notice

£500

Page 108

C1022 Parkhouse Railway Bridge

Request from member of the public to consider introduction of traffic lights to control passage of drivers over the bridge following serious accidents at this location

Safety camera partnership/ Police to provide update on number of accidents on Parkhouse Railway Bridge after request for Traffic Lights and TDUs

£0

Issues Raised in September

U1164 Sewells Lonning Request from PC to introduce 7.5T weight restriction to reduce risk of pedestrian accidents

CCC to carry out traffic survey

£200

A595 Caldewgate around new superstore

Concerns raised by The Police that due to lack of pedestrian guard railing there is greater risk of pedestrian/vehicle conflict when pedestrians cross away from designated crossing points

CCC to request CCTV camera up to monitor pedestrians crossing after the central guardrails have been removed

£0

Chiswick St Request from member of the public to consider implementation of 20mph speed limit on Chiswick St

Jeff to check database for any collisions on Chiswick Street following request for it to be a 20 mph zone

£0

Brookside/Bower St

Complaint from resident about speedingand accidents at junction of Brookside and Bower St

CCC to carry out investigation into accidents and causation factors to determine whether any measures can be put in place

£0

Brunel Way

Request via Local Member following Press comments regarding Fatal Accident to consider introduction of guard railing at this location and others where paths join roads

Advice from Police was that it was considered that there were no engineering contributions to the cause of this accident and to wait for outcome of Police investigation before discussing appropriate action £0

A6 Botchergate

Request to reconsider requirement for Botchergate night time closures

Police analylist to get figures of number of accidents before TRO and after introduction of order. Police comment that since introduction of Order ASB has declined significantly in the area. £0

Issues Raised in November

C1023/U1053 Low Row

Request from Parish Council to investigate an incident of unsafe driving/speeding and introduction of a speed limit through the village

A site inspection has been carried out the village meets the criteria for consideration for the introduction of a 30mph speed limit. The CRASH Group supported this request. £5,000

Issues Raised in January

Lingmoor Way Harraby 20mph Speed limit request

Police to investigate traffic speed data and report back to next meeting

A6071 Greenmill Road Longtown

Concerns raised by PC regarding risk of accidents for vehicles using the junction and children crossing the road to catch buses

Police noted that this stretch of road has already been investigated and as a result speed enforcement is periodically carried out. No further action is proposed. Bus stop improvements are to be carried by the County Council's Integrated Transport Team at no cost to the Local Committee

A7 Longtown Area

Request from the PC to address road safety concerns with overtaking vehicles leaving Longtown heading North

No concerns raised at the Group. CCC to consider asking Connect to make minor change to the double white line system to try to alleviate concerns £0

Page 109

Appendix 8

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE HIGHWAY BUDGETS 2013/14

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Members are asked to approve recommendations for the Local Committee’s devolved revenue and capital highways budgets for 2013/2014 including prioritised lists of schemes, which will form the basis of the Local Committee’s devolved capital programme for 2013/14 and provide a core programme for future years subject to annual review.

1.2 The indicative allocations for 2013/14 are £2,364,031 (revenue) and £3,266,000 (capital) respectively, subject to final approval by Council.

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 The County Councils budget is a key part of the policy framework for the County Council and links directly with the Council Plan and Directorate Service Plans.

2.3 There is no requirement for an Equality Impact Assessment at this stage.

Equality Impact Assessments will be undertaken on a scheme specific basis for those Works which have received approval to proceed and exceptions will be brought back to the Committee for consideration.

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 That the Highways and Transportation Working Group recommends that they Local Committee agrees the proposed revenue and devolved capital programmes for 2013/14.

3.2 That the Local Committee notes the schemes to be undertaken in Carlisle from within the central block of the Transport Capital Programme.

CARLISLE HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP

Meeting date: 28th February 2013

From: Assistant Director – Environment

Page 110

4.0 BACKGROUND

Revenue 2013/14

4.1 The County Council meeting on 14th February considered proposals to devolve a further £800k of capital funding to Local Committees from the Priority Transport Improvement Schemes (PTIS) capital highways budget, whilst at the same time reducing the highways revenue budget for local committees by £800k.

4.2 The allocation of the resulting revenue budget for Carlisle across the main routine and cyclic maintenance activity headings is shown in the table below.

Rural and Classified Network

Urban Unclassified Network (HCR)

Total Budget 2012/`13

Proposed Budget 2013/14

Comments

Better Highways

£732,188 £470,600 £1,202,788 £1,179,031

Cyclic Maintenance

£175,000 £190,000 £365,000 £309,000 Includes for Gully Cleansing, verge maintenance and signs & road markings

Lifecycle & Routine Works CNDR Network

£1,000 Annual payment for maintenance of Improvements undertaken on the CNDR Network

Road Lighting

£602,000 £160,000 £762,000 £712,000 Includes £462k energy costs which may increase

Traffic Signals

£148,000 0 £148,000 £148,000 Contracted maintenance costs are being reassessed to take account of new installations

Other £15,000 £40,000 £55,000 £15,000 £40k was Winter Maintenance contribution to City Council

Total £1,672,188 £860,600 £2,532,788 £2,364,031

(a) Better Highways Teams are acknowledged as being a key aspect of how the Highway Service is delivered. Experience of the first 6 months of “in-house” operation is starting to clarify costs and best practice to ensure that this aspect of what we do is provided as effectively and efficiently as we can. We believe that 7 Better Highways Teams can be funded within the 2013/14 draft budget enabling 4 rural based and 3 City based teams.

(b) Members may recall that, as a result of the introduction of speed limits on the A7, the increased Lifecycle & Routine Maintenance costs payable to

Page 111

Connect CNDR are to be found from the Revenue Budget. This amounts to some £1,000 in 2013/14

Capital 2013/14

4.3 As noted in paragraph 4.1 members will be aware that the reduction in Revenue budget is to be offset by providing Local Committees with an equivalent increase in the devolved capital budget. It is proposed that this funding will be used to undertake preventative maintenance activities such as patching, resurfacing and drainage works carried out by the “in-house” teams.

4.4 In the Autumn Statement in December 2012 an additional Local Highways Maintenance Fund (Capital) was announced for all Local Authorities. For Cumbria County Council this resulted in an additional £3,890k in 2013/14 and £2,082k for 2014/145. £2,137k of this is to be allocated to local committees for additional Capital Maintenance Works

4.5 The proposed Devolved Capital Budget for the Carlisle area in 2013/14 is made up as follows

2013/14 Base Basic

Maintenance Allocation

Additional Maintenance Allocation

2013/14 Proposed

2012/13

£2,713,000 £168,000 £385,000 £3,266,000 £2,860,000

4.6 It is suggested that the budget be allocated as shown below.

Budget 2012/13

Draft Budget 2013/14

Comments

TABLE 1

Footway & Cycle Path Maintenance

£307,593 £484,000 Increase to allow for flagged footway improvements to reduce future defects

TABLE 2

Structural carriageway maintenance and Surface treatments

£1,074,709 £961,000 Priority assesses resurfacing and micro surfacing schemes.

TABLE 3

Minor Structural Maintenance

£1,000,875 £1,425,650 Preparation of future years surface treatment beds, which include hand patching, machine patching and overlays, also localised surface sealing and small scale permanent carriageway repairs.

TABLE 4

Drainage & Remedial Earthworks

£89,098 £185,000 Increase to allow for improvements to an increasing number of identified drainage issues.

Page 112

TABLE 5

Lighting

£209,254 £65,000 Budget to be revised as road lighting strategy is developed and capacity reviewed

TABLE 6

Traffic Signals

£38,885 £27,000 Upgrading of existing analogue BT lines to Digital – Agreed 5 year

TABLE 7

Improvement Schemes

£138,875 £177,850 Acknowledged that alterations to TRO’s and minor safety improvements will continue to be required.

£2,859,289 £3,266,000

4.7 Members will recall that that the schemes to be included in the Capital programme for 2013/14 were presented and agreed at the 30th October 2012 Local Committee meeting. An updated prioritised listing of these schemes with an indicative budget cut off line is provided in the individual tables in Appendix 1

4.8 Appendix 2 provides the list of schemes to be undertaken in in 2013/14 in the Carlisle Area funded from the central (non-devolved) block of the Transport Capital Programme.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 Members may wish to suggest alternative ways in which the budgets should be allocated across the revenue and capital blocks.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 A structured approach is taken to identifying, assessing and allocating resources to both maintenance and improvement schemes. Members agreed an initial list of capital funded projects, based on this approach, for 2013/14 at their meeting in October 2012.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 The County Council has statutory duties to maintain the highway and in certain circumstances could be held liable for injury damage or loss caused to users of the highway as a result of failure to take responsible precautions to secure their safe use of the highway. There are no other direct legal implications.

7.2 The allocation of resources available for highway improvement schemes on the basis of demonstrable priorities would support the Council’s defence against any third party claims that might be made on the basis of loss suffered allegedly as a result of a failure to improve the highway.

Page 113

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 This report lists the 2013/14 revenue allocations and highways capital projects.

Andrew Moss

Assistant Director – Environment

February 2013 APPENDIX

1 Capital Programme Projects for 2013/14 2 Non-Devolved Capital Programme for 2013/14

IMPLICATIONS Electoral Division(s): All divisions

* Please remove whichever option is not applicable

Executive Decision No

Key Decision No*

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A*

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No*

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A*

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No*

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

No*

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? No*

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and the Head of Member Services and Scrutiny has obtained the necessary approvals.

Page 114

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees]

• Agreement on the draft 2013/14 Capital Programme – Local Committee 30th October 2012

• Note of Lifecycle / Routine Maintenance Costs in relation to improvements on A7 - Minutes of HTWG 14th August 2012 reported to Carlisle Local Committee 14th September 2012

CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny. BACKGROUND PAPERS No background papers. Contact: Kevin Walsh Tel: 01228 673072 Email address: [email protected]

Page 115

Appendix 8.1 APPENDIX 1 TABLE 1

PROPOSED CARLISLE AREA NPRN FOOTWAY SCHEMES 2013 -14

Road

No

Location Proposed Work Estimated

Works Cost £

Cumulative

Scheme

Cost £

Length of

Proposed

Treatment m

Average

Footway

Width m

A6 London Road – Rydal St to Grey St Relay Flags £34,086 £34,086 200 2.00

U1213 Cumrew Village Reconstruction £35,632 £69,718 250 1.20

A595 Wigton Rd - Queensway to Richard Rose Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge £19,845 £89,563 145 2.00

Minor small scale third party claim reduction

works and improvements to pedestrian

crossing points to meet Disability

Discrimination Act non conformities at

unscheduled locations.

Kerbs and flagging £60,000 £149,563 Various Various

C1037 Scalegate Road – Mount Pleasant Rd to Ridley

Rd Relay Bitmac £12,435 £161,998 220 2.50

C2051 Orton Road - (Number 100 to Orton Stores

(South Side) Relay Bitmac £19,439 £181,437 100 2.00

A7 Kingstown Road (Kengas) Replace flags with bitmac £18,341 £199,778 80 1.40

Fusehill Street – Between college entrances Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge £8,497 £208,275 70 3.50

A7 Stanwix Bank - St Georges Crescent to

Cromwell Crescent (West Side)

Relay Flags and Renew Flags £21,309 £229,584

100 2.50

Spencer Street – Georgian Way to Warwick

Road

Relay Bitmac £31,227 £260,811 241 2.50

C1022 Parkhouse Rd - Asda to Kingmoor Park Relay Bitmac £29,541 £290,352 382 1.40

189 - 203 Pennine Way

Lift &relay kerbs & relay

bitmac

£14,888 £305,240 124 1.80

2 - 12 Meadow View Lift &relay kerbs & flags +

bitmac verge

£13,223 £318,463 80 1.80

Page 116

B6264 Brampton Rd - Croft Rd to Longlands Rd Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge £12,538 £331,001 80 2.75

Garden Street - south west side Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge £11,498 £342,499 90 2.50

C1041 Upperby Road - Cant Crescent to Kirklands

Road (East Side) Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge £21,227 £363,726 150 2.50

Hilary Grove – No.s 58 to 64 Relay Flags and Bitmac verge £9,562 £373,288 60 2.00

A69 Warwick Road - Rugby Club to Brunton Park Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge £29,497 £402,785 190 3.00

Greystone Rd - Jackson Street to Brunton

Avenue

Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge £18,100 £420,885 120 2.50

Greystone Rd - Jackson St to Tullie St Lift & relay flags + bitmac

verge

£8,122 £429,007 60 2.20

Hilary Grove – South Side Relay Flags and Bitmac verge £19,275 £448,282 150 2.00

2 - 12 Rosevale Lift & relay kerbs, replace flags

with bitmac

£12,538 £460,820 80 1.80

Lismore Place - Strand Rd to Victoria Place

(west side)

Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge £20,104 £480,924 145 1.80

BUDGET CUT-OFF LINE

C1036 Currock Rd - between railway bridges Relay Bitmac £31,978 £512,902 400 2.00

Fusehill Street – College entrance to tie in Relay flags and Bitmac verge £6,697 £519,599 30 3.50

Victoria Viaduct Relay Flags £54,388 £573,987 450 3.00

C1020 Scotby Village (Railway Bridge to Post Office,

East Side)

Relay Bitmac / Slurry Seal

C1027 Great Corby Replace cast insitu footway

C1012 Houghton, from garage through village Patch and slurry

C1036 Durdar Road - Hammonds Pond to Blackwell

Vale

Station Road, Brampton

Page 117

APPENDIX 1 TABLE 2A

PROPOSED CARLISLE AREA NPRN CARRIAGEWAY STRUCTURAL SCHEMES 2013 -14

Parish / Ward Road

Number

Location Type of

Work

Estimated

Scheme Cost

Cumulative

Estimated

Scheme

Costs

Total Scheme

Length (m)

Castle Drovers Lane & West Tower Street Inlay £70,000 £70,000 180

Longtown & Bewcastle C1022 Parkhouse to Harker jnc Inlay £120,000 £190,000 314

Longtown & Bewcastle C1022 Parkhouse Rd (mini R/B to Kingstown Rd Inlay £35,000 £225,000 80

Stanwix & Irthington C1012 Hethersgill x rds Inlay £10,000 £235,000 80

Belle Vue C2042 Burgh Road Inlay £21,000 £256,000 200

Yewdale U1297 Sandsfield Lonning Overlay £53,000 £309,000 750

Belah C1016 Kingmoor Road Overlay £58,000 £367,000 300

Dalston & Cummersdale U1134 Dobbies Bend Haunch and

Overlay

£50,000 £417,000 250

Dalston & Cummersdale C1037 Red Cat towards Burthwaite - Phase 2 Overlay /

Patching

£100,000 £517,000 400

Brampton & Gilsland C1013 Walton foot Reconstructi

on

£25,000 £542,000 100

Castle Victoria Viaduct Inlay £60,000 £602,000 250

Harraby C1045 Eastern Way Investigation

Only

£10,000 £612,000 Variable

Page 118

Currock Lancaster Street Reconstructi

on

£30,000 £642,000 130

Wetheral C1019 Park Road, Scotby Inlay £51,000 £693,000 250

Castle Lonsdale Street Inlay / Recon £25,000 £718,000 185

Longtown & Bewcastle C1013 Harker Bridge to Harker Xroads Inlay

Patching

£63,000 £781,000 200

Longtown & Bewcastle U1062 Sandysike to Hornickhill Overlay/Patc

hing

£61,000 £842,000 150

Castle Dacre Road, Carlisle Overlay £46,000 £888,000 190

BUDGET CUT-OFF LINE

Longtown & Bewcastle C1004 Shankhill School To Pallyards Overlay/Ditc

hing

£39,000 800

Longtown & Bewcastle C1006 Hemplands Bridge Overlay/Iron

Work

£25,000 385

Longtown & Bewcastle C1006 Drovers inn to Whiteholm Overlay/Ditc

hing

£70,000 1,825

Longtown & Bewcastle B6318 Sleetbeck X roads towards Huntsman Pub Overlay £60,000 Variable

Longtown & Bewcastle U1276 Baileytown Farm Easton Overlay £20,000 200

Dalston & Cummersdale U1145 Skiprigg Farm to Thrangholm Bridge Overlay £39,000 690

Longtown & Bewcastle C1004 587m From Old Dog and Gun to ch1430 Overlay £38,000 843

Longtown & Bewcastle C1004 Hillhead to Saughs Farm Overlay £55,000 1,000

Page 119

Longtown & Bewcastle C1004 Saughs to Bailey Mill jnc Overlay/Patc

hing

£55,000 1,100

Longtown & Bewcastle C1025 Kershope Bridge to the old Dog and Gun Overlay/Patc

hing

£100,000 1,687

Wetheral C1040 Lowther Arms Cumwhinton Inlay £12,000 142

Dalston & Cummersdale U1127 Little Orton to Sceughmire Overlay /

Patching

£30,000 100

Stanwix & Irthington U1081 Priorrigg to Wainheadgate Farm Overlay £51,000 1,000

Dalston & Cummersdale U1118 Boustead Hill ch1920 to ch2400 Overlay £24,000 500

Longtown & Bewcastle U1013 Southlambhill to Pedderhill Overlay £68,000 1,336

Longtown & Bewcastle U1276 Blackrigg Farm, Easton Overlay £48,000 800

Stanwix & Irthington U1277 Littlefield Hethersgill Overlay £23,000 408

Brampton & Gilsland U1241 Ch0 to Common house Overlay/Iron

Work

£36,000 400

Brampton & Gilsland U1241 Ch630 to 1040 Common House Gilsland Overlay/Iron

Work

£35,000 410

Stanwix & Irthington U1093 Walby Grange to A689 Overlay/Patc

hing

£44,000 1,750

Stanwix & Irthington U1093 Walby Grange to Wallhead Overlay/Patc

hing

£44,000 1,782

Stanwix & Irthington U1198 The Flatt Farm, Faugh Overlay

Wetheral U1193 The Shieling, Sandy Lane, Nr Broadwath Overlay 1,000

Page 120

APPENDIX 1 TABLE 2B

PROPOSED CARLISLE AREA NPRN CARRIAGEWAY MICRO ASPHALT SCHEMES 2013 -14

Parish Ward Location Length m Width m Area m²

Belle Vue Kirksteads Road, B5307 to 12 Kirksteads Rd 118 6.2 731.6

Castle Abbots Road, Bedford Road to Crummock Street 33 4.9 161.7

Belle Vue Acredale to Birchdale Road Kirkstead Rd to Keld Road 434 5.8 2517.2

Harraby Crossways, Cumwhinton Rd to Meadow View + Whinton Crescent 618 6 3708

Castle Bedford Rd between Granite Setts Abbotts Rd to Dalston Rd 298 7.2 2145.6

Castle Portland Square, Brunswick to Alfred street 136 9.4 1278.4

Currock Coney Street, Aldelphi Terrace to Currock Park Avenue + Lediard Avenue 329 8.1 2664.9

TOTAL COST: £73,000

Page 121

APPENDIX 8.1 TABLE 3A

PROPOSED CARLISLE AREA MICRO ASPHALT PREPARATION SCHEMES

2013 -14

Parish / Ward Location Treatment

Castle Strand rd, Compton street to Lismore st including

Hartington Street

Pre Patching MA

Dalston & Cummersdale Stockwell Road – Rye Close Pre Patching MA

Harraby Petterill Bank Road Pre Patching MA

Brampton & Gilsland Dacre Road Estate Pre Patching MA

Botcherby Silverdale Road - Pennine Way to Edgehill Road Pre Patching MA

Botcherby Creswell Av - Brantwood to Pennine Way Pre Patching MA

Harraby Longdyke Drive Pre Patching MA

Morton Kelvin Grove – Wansfell Avenue Pre Patching MA

Wetheral Hurley Road, Corby Hill Pre Patching MA

Botcherby Eldon Drive - Brantwood to Edgehill Rd Pre Patching MA

Stanwix Urban Garden Street from Eden St Pre Patching MA

Currock Millholme Av - Boundary Road to Blackwell Road Pre Patching MA

Castle Warwick Sq NE - Warwick Road to Aglionby St Pre Patching MA

Dalston & Cummersdale Townhead Road - Glebe Court to Buebank Road Pre Patching MA

Morton Newlaithes Av - Mossrigg to Bannisdale Way Pre Patching MA

Denton Holme Richardson Street Pre Patching MA

Belah Deer Park Road - Kingmoor Road to Dixon St Pre Patching MA

Harraby Highbank Close - London Rd to Cul-de-sac Pre Patching MA

St Aidans Orchard St - Fusehill St to End Pre Patching MA

Denton Holme Milbourne St - Charlotte St cul-de-sac Pre Patching MA

St Aidans St Cuthbert St / Oswald St / Lindesfarne Junc - Speed Table Pre Patching MA

Stanwix Urban Croft Road - Brampton Rd to Longlands Road Pre Patching MA

Belah Liddle Close - Main run from Lowry Hill Pre Patching MA

Dalston & Cummersdale Riverside, Buckabank Pre Patching MA

St Aidans Flower St - Orchard St to End Pre Patching MA

Dalston & Cummersdale Cawflands, Durdar Pre Patching MA

Belah Netherby Drive - from Lowry Hill Road Pre Patching MA

Belah Dixon Rd - St Anns Cres to Deer Park Rd Pre Patching MA

Belah Bailey Rd / Teasdale Close - Loop off Lowry Hill Rd Pre Patching MA

Harraby Central Av - Cul-de-sacs at South end Pre Patching MA

Botcherby Oakleigh Way - Cul-de-sac leading to no 12 Pre Patching MA

St Aidans South St - London Road to Fusehill St Pre Patching MA

St Aidans Garden St - Orchard St to Grey St Pre Patching MA

St Aidans Charles St - Fusehill St to Edward St Pre Patching MA

Belah St Anns Crescent - Kingmoor Road Pre Patching MA

Dalston & Cummersdale Blackwell Estate - Low Moor Rd; Rye Close & Broome Garth Pre Patching MA

Belah Kershope Road - Turning Head Pre Patching MA

Denton Holme Pugin St / Kenmount Place - Dalston Rd to Nelson St Pre Patching MA

Page 122

Morton Lowther Brown Lonning / Brownrigg Drive Pre Patching MA

St Aidans Brunton Av - Warwick Road to Brunton Cres Pre Patching MA

Botcherby Lyngarth - Allandale Rd to Tindale Drive Pre Patching MA

Belah Newfield Drive - Kingstown Road main cul-de-sac to The

Grange

Pre Patching MA

Castle Morton St Pre Patching MA

Denton Holme Trafalgar St - Denton St to Blencow St Pre Patching MA

Stanwix Urban B6264 Brampton Road - Stanwix Bank to Art College Pre Patching MA

The above locations will be prepared in priority order to the limit of funding available (the costs will not be known until physically marked on site after the Winter period).

Page 123

APPENDIX 8.1 TABLE 3B

PROPOSED CARLISLE AREA SURFACE DRESSING PREPARATION

SCHEMES 2013 -14

Parish / Ward Road No Location Treatment

Longtown & Bewcastle C1005 Lynedale to Windy Hill Pre patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1004 Windy Hill to The Row Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1006 High Luckens to Black Lyne Bridge Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1006 Netherby to Easton Pre Patching SD

Wetheral C1027 A69 Warwick Bridge to Great Corby Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1007 A6071 Junction to Wellknowerigg Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1007 Wellknowerigg to Chapeltown Pre Patching SD

Dalston & Cummersdale B5307 CNDR Roundabout towards Moorhouse Pre Patching SD

Dalston & Cummersdale C2042 Monkhill to West of Burgh by Sands Pre Patching SD

Brampton & Gilsland C1029 Burtholme (remainder following winter damage

overlay)

Pre Patching SD

Dalston & Cummersdale C1021 Great Orton X roads to Great Orton Pre Patching SD

Dalston & Cummersdale C2051 Great Orton X roads towards Great Orton Pre Patching SD

Dalston & Cummersdale C2048 Dalston to Cumdivock (Chalkfoot) Pre Patching SD

Dalston & Cummersdale U1162 Cummersdale - 20mph to river (Flood damage) Pre Patching SD

Stanwix & Irthington U1080 Crosshill Pre Patching SD

Stanwix & Irthington U1094 Farrers junction towards Laversdale junction Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1064 Low Hallburn Farm Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1062 Sandysike to Longtown church (Sandysike to

Hornickhill)

Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1062 Sandysike to Longtown church (Hornickhill to

Longtown Church)

Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1003 Slealandsburn to Fine View, Easton Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1004 The Row to The Crossings (Sleetbeck) Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1025 Whintingstown (Brownhills) to B6318 near

Nickies Hill (Through Bewcastle)

Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1008 The Moat to The Inch Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1013 Glencroft (C1006 junc) to Pedderhill Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1026 Kinkry Hill to Roadhead Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1027 C1004 junc to B6318 junc Oakshawford (Snouts?) Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1027 Nether Oakshaw to Roughsike Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1028 Snouts (B6318 junc) to Low Todholes Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1035 C1025 (Brownhills) to Rawney Ford Pre Patching SD

Brampton & Gilsland U1037 Lyne Bank Bridge to Park Farm (Park School) Pre Patching SD

Stanwix & Irthington U1044 Kirkcambeck to Cays House Pre Patching SD

Stanwix & Irthington U1045 Patties Hill to Longrigg Pre Patching SD

Stanwix & Irthington U1046 Whitegate Cottage to Gibbs Hill Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1279 Crofthead Pre Patching SD

Page 124

Wetheral B6413 Longdyke to Rising Sun Pre Patching SD

Wetheral C1042 Cairnhead to King Harry X roads + ditching Pre Patching SD

Wetheral C1042 Gateshaw Mill to Gateshaw Mill Rd Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1274 Watlerhurst Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1001 Battenbush Pre Patching SD

Wetheral U1213 Turnberry Lonning Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1064 Hospital Rd to Hallburn Rd, Low Hallburn Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1063 A6071 to Old Road, Longtown 30mph Pre Patching SD

Dalston & Cummersdale C1041 Low Hurst to Brisco X rds Pre Patching SD

Stanwix & Irthington U1181 Crosby on Eden to A689 Pre Patching SD

Dalston & Cummersdale C1041 Area boundary to Brisco X rds Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1061 Church to Hopesyke X rds Pre Patching SD

Wetheral C1024 Skellion to Corby Hill Pre Patching SD

Brampton & Gilsland C1031 Netherton X roads to Skellion Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle U1061 A7 to A6071 Hopesyke Wood Pre Patching SD

Wetheral U1214 Albyfield Pre Patching SD

Wetheral U1215 Brackenthwaite Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1001 The Moat - Livingstone House to the Inch

Junction

Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1015 Harker Bridge to Harker Crossroads Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1016 Firbank to Westlinton Pre Patching SD

Longtown & Bewcastle C1016 Lynefoot to Floristonrigg Pre Patching SD

Wetheral C1020 Cumwhinton to Scotby Pre Patching SD

Brampton & Gilsland C1031 Hollerbank to Hill House Pre Patching SD

Brampton & Gilsland C1032 Hollerbank to Farlam Pre Patching SD

Stanwix & Irthington C1013 Corby Hill Xrds to Little Corby Road Warwick

Bridge

Pre Patching SD

The above locations will be prepared in priority order to the limit of funding available (the costs will not be known until physically marked on site after the Winter period). SUGGESTED ALLOCATIONS WITHIN THE MINOR STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE: Proposed Carlisle Area NPRN Micro Asphalt preparation £150,000 Proposed Carlisle Area NPRN Surface Dressing preparation £789,112 Permanent Carriageway Repairs £300,000 (Small scale carriageway repairs identified by public complaint or through routine safety inspections) Small scale surface sealing £130,000 Total £1,369,112

Page 125

APPENDIX 8.1 TABLE 4

PROPOSED CARLISLE AREA NPRN DRAINAGE AND REMEDIAL EARTHWORKS SCHEMES 2013 -14

D (Drainage)

R (Remedial

Earthworks)

Road Grid Ref Scheme Name Description Estimated

Scheme

Cost

Cumulative

Estimated

Scheme Cost

D 339724,

556308

Dacre Rd, Carlisle Carriageway flooding becoming

impassable.

£9,000 £9,000

R C1016 336360,

660621

Bankend, Cargo Geotechnical investigation to

determine future works

£24,000 £33,000

D / R Various Various Reactive works at unscheduled location as a result of

damage cause by inclement weather conditions

Drainage and remedial earthworks £30,000 £63,000

R C1007 340921,

566453

Bush on Lyne Embankment works £7,500 £70,500

D U1113 334016,

557844

Monkhill to Moorhouse Renew chamber and culvert and check

connection to existing outfall.

£11,500 £82,000

R C1006 349490,

573579

Near ‘The Hagg’, Blacklyne Bridge Major embankment slip –

Geotechnical investigation

£9,000 £91,000

D C2042 333928,

558729

Monkhill towards Wormanby Clearing of existing deep ditch within

schedule monument

£6,500 £97,500

D B6263 346421,

553717

Between Wetheral & Cumwhinton Flooding of carriageway - Culvert

works

£4,239 £101,379

D C1005 347544,

570701

Rack Bridge, just south of Rose Bank Installation of new 500mm pipe and

build up verge subsidence

£8,000 £109,379

Page 126

D B6413 Various Brampton to Carlatten Mill, Soakaway Brampton

Golf Club, Cherry Tree Farm Carlatten Mill

Replace Soakaways £6,800 £116,539

D C1012 341944,

561551

Greenacres Houghton Carriageway flooding – replace existing

drain

£29,575 £146,114

D C2042 335449,

558332

Kirkandrews on Eden (Bridge to Beaumont junction) Roots £18,500 £164,614

D C1012 347597,

568816

Bolton fellend Installation of surface water drain £20,000 £184,614

BUDGET CUT-OFF LINE

D U1021 343067,

570024

Drybeck Gabion Baskets Installation of new Gabion Baskets £6,791 £191,405

D U1099 350956,

563476

Cambeck Hill Verge subsidence & gabion baskets £22,454 £213,859

D U1068 334496,

562291

Demesne Rd, Rockcliffe Lifting road levels to remove standing

water. Part of Cumbria Coastal Way,

road needs surfacing due to water

damage

£25,000 £238,859

D U1199 349266,

557697

Peacock Lonning (Hayton) Land water runs off at bend, causing

road to freeze over in winter. Install 3

gullies, 50m French and 10m outfall

drain.

£8,024 £246,883

D U1241 363259,

566930

Howard House, Gilsland Flooding to carriageway around blind

corner, frequently impassable in heavy

rain - fire brigade (R.A.F.) attend.

£25,545 £272,428

D U1087 347820,

567177

The Scare Flooding to carriageway making it

impassable for vehicles.

£15,490 £287,918

D U1178 344425,

558892

Warwick Holme Carriageway flooding becoming

impassable - no through road.

£18,000 £305,918

D U1124 335194,

555124

Little Orton Flooding of carriageway from damaged

system, water backs into property.

£7,040 £312,958

D Dove Coat Blocked drainage SMC £5,992 £318,950

D C1013 Walton Highrigg Drainage £3,567 £322,517

Page 127

D B6318 Mumpshall Bridge, Gilsland Drainage

D C1005 Low Dubwath Farm Drainage

D C1012 Old School, Hethersgill Drainage

D C1012 Parkview Farm, Scaleby

D C1013 Newby Village

U1041 Dableymoor Road

D U1173 Millbrooke Lodge, Brunstock

R C1025 362008,

565541

Low Row / Upper Denton, Gilsland Concrete beam in verge; include for

kerbs / restraint

R Bewcastle Verge slip

R A689 Coalfell nr Greenside Farm Carriageway depressions

D C1027 353103,

551520

Near Carlatton Cottages New Outfall

D U1095 Carlisle Airport Filter drain into existing system

D U1193 Sandy Lane, near Broadwath Carriageway flooding threatening

property, no through road.

Page 128

APPENDIX 8.1 TABLE 5

PROPOSED CARLISLE AREA NPRN LIGHTING SCHEMES 2013 -14

Road No. Location Approx

A595 Wigton Road, Carlisle – Port Road roundabout to Wheatlands Installation of new columns and LED lighting.

£45,000

Various Column painting - Scotby £8,000

Various Column structural testing £7,500

Various Signs no longer require illumination £2,500

Various Bollards no longer require illumination £2,500

Total: £65,500

Page 129

APPENDIX 8.1 TABLE 6

PROPOSED CARLISLE AREA TRAFFIC SIGNALS SCHEMES 2013 -14

PHASE COMMENT YEAR EST COST

Carlisle City Centre – Botchergate Utilise ducted system and/or wireless technology as appropriate

2013 - 14

£14,000

Carlisle City Centre – Spencer Street

£13,000

PROPOSED BUDGET CUT OFF

Scotland Road Look to install a wireless ‘corridor’ on Scotland Road to link up the traffic signals, with potential for other future use (eg RTI bus displays)

2014 - 15

£47,000

Carlisle City Centre – Nelson Bridges Sites

Expand the communications system to other parts of Carlisle, using wireless and ducted systems as appropriate. S278 Developments may fund future expansion. When BT lines are no longer used, move UTC traffic signals computer to central server ‘farm’.

2015 - 16

£6,000 £9,750 £9,750

Warwick Road West

2016 - 17

£3,700

Warwick Road East £9,750

London Road/B&Q £6,900

London Road East £10,000

Caldewgate and Shaddongate £15,000

CNDR Sites

Re-site UTC Server to Server Farm

5 year programme agreed at Carlisle Area Highways Committee 22nd March 2012.

Page 130

APPENDIX 8.1 TABLE 7

PROPOSED CARLISLE AREA NPRN

MINOR IMPROVEMENT SCHEMES

2013 -14

Road No Scheme Title Description LTP3 Score

Estimated Cost

Status Running total

Various Traffic Variation Order Carlisle 2013(1)

Zone A/C amendments postponed from 2011/12

TS £20,250 Outline design complete. Partially considered

by LC 2011/12 but decision postponed for further consideration

£20,250

Various Traffic Variation Order 2013(2) Zone D/E Review TS £13,500 Awaiting Local Committee Approval £33,750

Various Post Scheme Implementation Surveys

Funding to provide assessment of measures introduced

TS £5,000 £38,750

Various Community Street Audits Minor Public Realm improvements (De-

cluttering, access measures etc) identified through local area surveys.

TS £10,000 Works to be identified following meetings with

local user groups £48,750

Various Minor Local Safety Schemes 2013

Minor safety improvements at sites identified by CRASH Group Neighbourhood Forum etc

TS £12,000 No schemes identified at this time but likely to

be carry forward from 2012/13 £60,750

Various City Centre Cycle Parking Review cycle parking in the City Centre

core 63.8 £5,000 £65,750

A6071 Newtown Speed Limit Review

Introduce Speed limit on A6071 and through village. Set limit dependant on

outcome of further investigation. Implementation of limits from Speed

Review approved by Local Committee

57.2 £8,100 Approval to consult from Local Committee

01/11/11. £73,850

Montgomery Way/Wingate Road

Footway Improvement Works 48.5 £17,900 Request from Local Resident, has Local

Member support £91,750

Various Cumwhinton Speed Limit Review

Carry out assessment of existing speed limit boundaries and amend as necessary

48.5 £10,000 Request from Parish Council. No

investigation/feasibility undertaken £101,750

B5299 Caldew School 20mph Zone Introduction of advisory 20mph Zone 47.5 £6,000 Request from School. No

investigation/feasibility undertaken £107,750

U1133 Barras Lane, Dalston Speed Limit Review

Extend 30mph Speed limit on Barras Lane from existing limit to Barras Brow.

Implementation of limits from Speed 44.3 £6,100

Approval to consult from Local Committee 01/11/11.

£113,850

Page 131

Review approved by Local Committee

U1182 Crosby on Eden School 20mph Zone

Introduction of advisory 20mph Zone 45.7 £6,000 Request from PC for improvements at the

school £119,850

A689 Hallbankgate Introduce advisory 20mph Zone 45.7 £12,000 Safety Concern Raised be Local Health Visitor £131,850

B5299 Dalston Speed 20mph Speed Limit

Introduction 20mph Zone 42.5 £20,000 Request from Parish Council. No

investigation/feasibility undertaken £151,850

Various School Warning Sign Review Replacement/update of school warning

signs and flasher units at various sites in the Carlisle areas.

41 £11,000 Works identified following review of sites as

part of SCP underspend 2009/10 £162,850

A69 Learning Village 20mph Zone Introduction of advisory 20mph Zone 41 £15,000 Request from School for road safety

improvements at this location £177,850

PROPOSED BUDGET CUT OFF

A6071 William Howard School 20mph Zone

Introduction of advisory 20mph Zone 39.7 £10,000 Request from Parents to improve road safety at

school £187,850

Moorville Drive VAS Sign Provide New VAS post site 38.8 £3,000 Safety Concern Raised be Carlisle City Council

Member £190,850

Various Harraby to Rosehill Cycle Link

Directional signing to Rosehill from the route through Keenan Park Direction signing along Wingate Road Petterill

Cycleway Link: Petterill to learning village via University Campus (Fusehill St).

38.8 £10,000 Movement Strategy Study - Cycle and

Pedestrian links £200,850

Various A & B

Warning Sign Review

Carry out survey of roads based on road hierarchy to identify and assess and

remove where appropriate un-necessary warning signage

38.3 £10,000 No schemes identified at this time £210,850

U1164 Sewells Lonning 7.5T Wt Restriction

Introduction of 7.5T wt restriction 36.8 £5,000 Request from Parish Council. No

investigation/feasibility undertaken £215,850

B6264 Brampton Old Road Speed Limit review

Introduce 40mph limit From existing 30mph limit at Whiteclosegate to M6

overbridge. Implementation of limits from Speed Review approved by Local

Committee

36.3 £20,250 Approval to consult from Local Committee £236,100

Page 132

Various Watchtree Cycle Link Signing of link from Hadrians Cycleway to Watchtree (Note small section of the route

is in Allerdale District ) 33.5 £7,500 £243,600

Various Carleton cycle lane extension Extension of the existing ACL on London

Road to Carleton. 32.8 £20,000

Movement Strategy Study - Cycle and Pedestrian links

£263,600

B6263 Wetheral Old Police House - Footway

Construct short length of link footway between The old Police House and

Whitegate 32.2 £10,800

Outline Design Complete land ownership issues to be resolved

£274,400

B6263 Wetheral to Warwick Bridge Speed Limit Review

Introduction of 30mph limit from Warwick Bridge to Eden Holme Implementation of limits from Speed Review approved by

Local Committee

31 £25,000 Approval to consult from Local Committee

01/11/11. £299,400

C1036 Stoneraise School Safety Zone Footway/verge improvements outside the

school 29.5 £15,000

Request from PC for improvements at the school

£314,400

U1282 Union Lane Brampton minor widening scheme 29.5 £7,500 £321,900

Various Edgehill Rd Pennine Way 20mph Zone

Introduction of 20mph Zone for remainder of roads in Harraby Estate

27.5 £29,700 Request from NF no investigation/feasibility

undertaken £351,600

Various Carlisle Car Park Signing Review

32.8 £25,000 £376,600

C1037/ various

Upperby 20mph Speed Limit Review

Potential amendments to existing 20mph zone to improve effectiveness and

enforceability 26.8 £10,000 Noted concerns following site inspections £386,600

Various Denton Holme 20mph Zone Introduction of 20mph zone for streets

bounded by Dalston Rd/Junction St/River Caldew

20.2 £30,000 Old scheme reintroduced at request of Local

Member £416,600

Various Skiddaw Rd/Ullswater Rd 20mph Zone

Introduction of 20mph Zone for remainder of roads between Dalston Rd, Dunmail Drive, Wigton Road and Stanhope Rd

18.8 £40,500 Outline design completed £457,100

Various Traffic Variation Order Carlisle 2014(2)

Carlisle Zones F and G Review 0 £10,100 £467,200

Various Traffic Variation Order Carlisle 2014(3)

Carlisle North Review 0 £13,500 £480,700

Various MLSS 2014 Minor safety improvements at sites

identified by CRASH Group Neighbourhood Forum etc

0 £12,000 £492,700

Page 133

Appendix 8.2

Transport Capital Programme – 2013/14 Non-Devolved Schemes

Engineering Safety Schemes

Road No. Description Study Type

B5299 Dalston Road between Shaddongate Junc. Signals and The Square, Dalston

Route studies

C1036 Durdar Rd between Durdar Rd Racecourse Entrance and Hutton in the Forest Junction B5305

Route studies

A6 Hesket at Milestone House Route studies

A6 London Rd between Eastern Way junc. and Red Lion Hotel Botchergate

Radial route studies

C1036 James St between Charlotte St via Denton St down James St and Hammonds Pond Entrance

Radial route studies

St Nicholas Bridge between Blackwell Rd / Currock Rd junc. and London Rd junc.

Radial route studies

Wigton Rd between Crummock St Junc. and Westrigg Rd Junction

Radial route studies

PRN Surface Treatment, Structural Maintenance & Drainage

Road No

Description Scheme Details Value

£k

Comments

A7 A69 Victoria Place – Lowther St to Georgian Way

Carriageway Surfacing Inlay £39.3 Night Working

A7 Scotland Road - South of Mulcaster Crescent to North of Cheviot Rd

Carriageway Surfacing Inlay £35.5 Night Working

A6 London Road – Harraby Green to Harraby Inn

Carriageway Surfacing Inlay £51.0

A689 Hallbankgate bump and quarry access

Carriageway Surfacing Inlay £14.7 Sunday Working

A7 Kingstown Rd -Lowry Hill Road to Kingstown Broadway

Carriageway Surfacing Inlay £53.5 Night Working

A69 Rosehill Junction Carriageway Surfacing Inlay £31.9 Draft schemes

Page 134

A69 Victoria Place Junction with Georgian Way

Carriageway Surfacing Inlay £16.7 utilising extra DfT funding

Bridges & Structures, Maintenance & Strengthening Schemes

Description Scheme Details Value £k Comments

Stonybeck Bridge, Great Corby

Maintenance £100 Site Works. Permanent Bridge replacement. Flood damage

Bog bridge Footbridge Maintenance £100 New Footbridge. Flood damage June 2012

Dovecote Bridge Maintenance £75 Site Works. Parapet wall repairs and pointing etc

C1023 Pikes Hill R/W Maintenance £30 c/f from 12/13

Holmehead Irish Ford Maintenance £12 Delayed from 12/13. Replacement of pipes on upstream side of ford

Cattle Grids Repairs Maintenance £25 Area Scheme S.O.I.

Irish Gate F/B (Millennium Bridge)

Maintenance £12 Outstanding maintenance work

Countryside Access Improvement Schemes

Description Scheme value (match funding) £k

Potential Funding Sources

Work Required

Cost to CCC

£k

Comments

Corridor links to Hadrian's Wall Path

£6.0 (£3.0) Hadrian's Wall Trust

surface furniture signage

£3.0 Improve links to Hadrian's Wall national trail

Page 135

Appendix 9

HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORT SERVICE PROGRESS REPORT – CAPITAL PROGRAMME IN CARLISLE

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report updates members on implementation of the 2012/13 Capital Programme as agreed by Local Committee at their meeting of 22nd March 2012.

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 The Council Plan 2011/14 was agreed by Full Council in February 2011. The Council Plan sets out the role of the Council and the Council’s strategic priorities and aspirations for the 3 years from 2011/14. The revenue and capital programmes are developed with the aim of supporting the delivery of all the Council’s aspirations, as set out in the Council Plan, with a focus on the priorities of challenging poverty in all its forms, ensuring that the most vulnerable people in our communities receive the support they need, and improving the life chances of the most disadvantaged in Cumbria.

2.2 The Council’s revenue and capital programmes are key to achieving the aim

underpinning the Council’s priorities and aspirations of being as effective and efficient as possible, prioritising services, targeting resources where they are most needed, re-engineering services to find a new, different and more effective and efficient ways to do things, and focusing on our customers, putting people at the heart of everything we do.

2.3 There is no requirement for an Equality Impact Assessment at this stage.

Equality Impact Assessments will be undertaken on a scheme specific basis for those Works which have received approval to proceed and exceptions will be brought back to the Group for consideration.

CARLISLE HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP,

Meeting date: 28th February 2013

From: Assistant Director – Environment

Page 136

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 Note progress with the 2012/13 Capital Programme as referenced in paragraphs 4.2 and 4.3

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 The Highways Capital Programme covers a range of activities some of which are centrally determined and others where decisions are devolved to local committees.

4.2 Appendix 1 sets out the schemes approved in the 2012/13 non-devolved capital budget, under the different capital blocks: Principal Road Network (PRN) Structural Maintenance, Bridges & Structures and Integrated Transport (which is sub divided into 5 separate areas of work). The tables included a simple “traffic light” system with a commentary against any schemes that are of concern.

(a) Further to the update on the Currock Bridge scheme provided in September 2012, which highlighted the fact that the scheme cost of this project is going to be higher than initially envisaged in the region of £2m. It is clear that, unfortunately we cannot move to the next stage of the project until adequate funding is available. We continue to assess potential sources of funding outwith the Highways Transport Capital budget to progress the scheme. A short progress report is provided at Appendix 3.

(b) The other Prep-Pool project listed for 2012/13, Lowther Street Pedestrian Improvement Scheme, requires the collection of in depth traffic data in a neutral month and the earliest this can be undertaken is late April 2013.

4.3 Appendix 2 sets out the schemes approved in the 2012/13 devolved capital budgets and as noted in 4.2 above also has a “traffic light” system added to the published tables.

4.4 In relation to these programmed schemes members will note that the majority are on track.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 Local Committee may make recommendations to Carlisle Local Committee based on the issues raised in this report.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 A structured approach needs to be taken to identifying, assessing and allocating resources to both maintenance and improvement schemes. The Highways Service is developing an asset management approach to help ensure that the process is robust and consistent across the Authority.

Page 137

6.2 By understanding the process being developed members can contribute to ensuring that scarce resources are allocated where they will be most effective.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 The County Council has statutory duties to maintain the highway and in certain circumstances could be held liable for injury damage or loss caused to users of the highway as a result of failure to take responsible precautions to secure their safe use of the highway. There are no other direct legal implications.

7.2 The allocation of resources available for highway improvement schemes on the basis of demonstrable priorities would support the Council’s defence against any third party claims that might be made on the basis of loss suffered allegedly as a result of a failure to improve the highway.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 This report updates the working group on progress with the 2012/13 Capital Programme and provides further insights into the development of future year’s programmes.

Andrew Moss

Assistant Director – Environment

February 2013 APPENDIX Appendix 1 Non Devolved Capital Programme 2012/13 Progress Tables Appendix 2 Devolved Capital Programme 2012/13 Progress Tables Appendix 3 Update Report on Currock Bridge IMPLICATIONS Electoral Division(s): All divisions

* Please remove whichever option is not applicable

Executive Decision No

Key Decision No*

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A*

Page 138

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No*

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A*

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No*

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

No*

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? No*

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented

until the expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and the Head of Member Services and Scrutiny has obtained the necessary approvals.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] March 2012 Local Committee July 2012 Local Committee September 2012 Local Committee CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny. BACKGROUND PAPERS No background papers. Contact: Kevin Walsh Tel: 01228 221386 Email address: [email protected]

Page 139

Appendix 9.1

Non Devolved Capital Budget 2012/13 Principal Road Network (PRN) Structural Maintenance

District Road No

Asset Group Scheme Type Details

Works Type Scheme / Location Description

Cost Status Comments

Carlisle A6 Carriageway

Surface Treatment

Patching Botchergate - English to Tait

£19,310 Programmed 4 –

5th March 2013

Carlisle A7 Carriageway Surfacing

Inlay and Patching

Lowther Street Bus Lane

£49,352 Programmed 11 –

13th March 2013

Carlisle A7

Carriageway Surfacing Inlay and Patching

Hardwick - Newmarket Jct on to Georgian way

£20,448

Complete

Carlisle A689 Carriageway

Surface Treatment

Surface Dressing

East of Hallbankgate

£69,391 Complete

Carlisle A7 Carriageway Surfacing

Inlay and Patching

Eden Bridge - Approach to Hardwick

£32,182

Complete

Carlisle A7 Carriageway Surfacing

Inlay and Patching

Georgian Way £68,876

Complete

Carlisle Carriageway

Surface Treatment

Patching Brunswick Street £25,554

Sub Total £285,113

Page 140

Bridges & Structures

This block of money is for a range of bridge, structures and geotechnical schemes as shown in the table below.

District Road Number

Scheme / Location Description

Scheme Type Details

Works Type Scheme Cost

Status Comments

Carlisle C1029

Dovecote Bridge Maintenance Works

Parapet wall repairs and pointing

£75,000 Work reprogrammed for

2013/14 due to design issues

Carlisle Various

Retaining Walls Maintenance Works

Repair/Rebuild walls as identified

£30,000

Carlisle Various

Cattle Grids Repairs Maintenance Works

Repair/Replace grids as identified

£25,000

Carlisle Various

Countywide slopes Slopes Works B6263 Warwick Bridge to Wetheral

£245,000 .Funding now allocated to

urgent scheme in Eden

Carlisle

High Bridge Stockdalewath Maintenance Works

Parapet and spandrel wall repairs

£10,000

Carlisle

Holmehead Irish Ford Maintenance Works Pipe replacement

£8,000

Work delayed by Environment Agency

Carlisle

Howford Bridge Maintenance Works Replace Parapets

£5,000

Carlisle

Routledgeburn Maintenance Works Parapet Repairs £9,000

Complete

Carlisle

Stanebeck Maintenance Works Remove vegetation £8,000

Complete

Carlisle

Gaitsgill Strengthening Works Diver Survey £5,000

Complete

£375,000

Page 141

1. Engineering Studies and Implementation Measures

Table 1a - Road Safety Studies

Table 1b - Implementation

Area Study Year

Study Title Location Measures Cost of Remedial Measures

Status Comments

Carlisle

2009/10 A7 Kingstown Road/Scotland Road, Carlisle

Kingstown Road/Morrisons/ Briar Bank junction

Review location of call cancel signal loop location and review signal timings.

£500 Complete

2. Improvement Schemes over £50k

Description Local Committee Allocation Status Comments

Route Studies

C1014 Junct 42 to Dalston

Carlisle £7K

Scheme Name Scheme Estimate (£K)

CCC Funding (£K)

Partner Funding (£K)

11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 Notes Status Comments

Prep Prep Prep Prep

Lowther Street pedestrian improvements

3 5 Preparation Work

Currock bridge and associated cycle links

1000 1000 Some 106

15 25

500

500

Preparation work to enable detailed design. CCC to pursue

See attached briefing note.

Page 142

partner/developer funding.

West Walls Carlisle Pedestrian improvements

400 0 20

200

200

No further action to be taken as agreed at Local Committee 30th July 2012.

Petteril Valley cycle route

120

120

5 Preparation work to develop accurate costing.

Preparation in 13/14.

Page 143

3. Other

Table 3. Rights of Way Improvement Plan

Project District

Total Scheme Cost (approx)

Capital Transport ROWIP spend

Potential Funding Sources

Potential Match Funding

Work required Justification

Status

Comments

C29 Dandy Line Phase 3

FP105024 Carlisle £8,000 £4,500

Landfill Tax ,

Parish funds, local

member

£3,500 Surface improvements on

a further section

This route links Brampton train station to the town. Phase 3 will see improvement from the railway station to A69 to further improve pedestrian access into the town. The route also links in to a number of permissive woodland routes.

Route is accessible but improvements limited due to Landowner Issues (Legal)

C288 Petteril Footpath129017

9011 Carlisle TBC TBC TBC

Legal diversion, groundwork, furniture

C25 + C27 Geltsdale

rationalisation 124001 4003 4006

4017

Carlisle TBC TBC TBC

Re-alignment of definitive line. Mainly legal work.

Some ground works may be necessary

Page 144

Appendix 9.2

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

HIGHWAY, DEVOLVED CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2012/13

TABLE 1 - CARRIAGEWAY SURFACE DRESSING PROGRAMME

Parish/Ward

Road No.

Start Grid Ref

Finish Grid Ref

Location

Urban/Rural

Dressing Type

Total Bed Length

(m)

Average Width

(m)

Area (m2)

Traffic

Management

Estimated Works

Cost for Each

Bed

Status

Comment

s

Bewcastle/Longtown and Bewcastle

C1004 350478 576996

351234 577503

Sleetbeck Crossroads to

Bailey Mill Rural

Racked-In

2100 4.4 9240 Road

Closure 18480

Complete

Bewcastle/Longtown and Bewcastle

B6318 350478 576983

352166 576537

Sleetbeck Crossroads to

Shawhead Rural

Racked-In

2120 5.3 11236 Road

Closure 22472

Complete

Nicholforest/ Longtown/Bewcastle

B6318 345823 576672

346100 576879

Catlowdy Village Rural Single 320 5.4 1728 Road

Closure 2022 Complete

Bewcastle/Longtown and Bewcastle

B6318 352117 575424

351795 574569

Roadhead Village

Rural Single 1100 5.6 6160 Road

Closure 8932 Complete

Solport/Longtown and Bewcastle

C1004 347262 571866

348134 572191

Shankhill to Windyhill

Rural Single 950 3.7 3515 Road

Closure 4218 Complete

Hethersgill/Stanwix and Irthington

C1012 347626 569114

351642 572417

Silver Syke Junction to

Lyneholmeford Rural Single 5780 5.8 33524

Road Closure

47604

Complete

Stapleton/Stanwix and Irthington

B6318 351953 572013

351944 572124

Crossings Inn Rural Single 100 4.5 450 Road

Closure 540 Complete

Stapleton/Stanwix and Irthington

C1005 347626 569114

347535 570772

Newlands Farm to Rack Bridge

Rural Single 1650 5.5 9075 Road

Closure 10890

Complete

Page 145

Hethersgill/Stanwix and Irthington

C1012 347822 567182

347626 569114

Hethersgill Crossroads to

Silver Syke Junction

Rural Single 2110 5.6 11816 Road

Closure 17133

Complete

Parish/Ward

Road No.

Start Grid Ref

Finish Grid Ref

Location

Urban/Rural

Dressing Type

Total Bed

Length (m)

Average Width

(m)

Area (m2)

Traffic

Management

Estimated

Works Cost for

Each Bed

Status

Comments

Irthington/Stanwix and Irthington

C1030 348460 564500

349240 563363

The 3 Horse Shoes

Rural Single 1410 5.5 7755 Road

Closure 9073 Complete

Bewcastle/Longtown

and Bewcastle C1025

354781 562687

355346 563260

Naworth to Great Easby

Rural Racked-

In 815 5.8 4727

Road Closure

9454 Complete

Burgh By

Sands/Dalston and Cummersdale

B5307 333017 556850

331846 556581

Moorhouse to Thurstonfield

Rural Racked-

In 1180 5.8 6844

Road Closure

13346

Complete

Orton/Dalston and

Cummersdale C2051

333550 552929

336603 554504

Orton Road-CNDR to Orton

Rural Single 3260 5.2 16952 Road

Closure 19834 Complete

St Cuthbert

Without/Dalston and Cummersdale

C1014 342695 551003

343485 551595

Brisco Crossroads to

Junction 42 Rural

Racked-In

1200 7.4 8880 7.3.28/1 16.5.32.

6 17760

Complete

St Cuthbert

Without/Dalston and Cummersdale

C1036 340208 549460

340462 550948

Stoneraise Rural Single 1360 6.1 8296 Road

Closure 9955

Complete

Dalston/Dalston and

Cummersdale C2049

337128 546650

337952 545419

Rose Castle to Raughton Head

Rural Single 1670 5.3 8851 Road

Closure 12834 Complete

149049 £224,547

Page 146

Ward Location Area (m²) Urban/Rural Estimated Scheme Cost

Status Comments

Currock Blackwell Road - 5 Road Ends to Currock

roundabout 2982.6 U £18,492 Complete

Dalston & Cummersdale

Durdar Road - Old White Ox to 40mph 8874.2 U £55,020 Complete

Brampton Brampton Town Centre 2198.1 U £13,628 Complete

Botcherby Durranhill Road - Montgomery Way to Alexandra

Drive 2220 U £13,764 Resurfaced with contribution to

Utility reinstatement

Longtown & Bewcastle

Parkhouse Road - Asda to Kingmoor Park 6957.4 U £43,136 Complete

Yewdale Orton Road - A595 to NSL

2283.5 U £14,157 Reinstatement of failed utility

trench now complete defer micro asphalt to next year

Currock Currock Road - Red Bank Tce to HRA joint 5459 U £27,295 Complete

St Aidans Greystone Road - Jackson St to Warwick Road 3188 U £15,940 Complete

Botcherby Brantwood Av - Edgehill Road to Pennine Way 2142 U £10,710 Complete

Belah Brackenridge - Fernlea Way to Briar Bank 3692 U £18,460 Complete

Morton Borrowdale Road - Dunmail Drive to No 24 1701 U £8,505 Complete

Stanwix Urban Tarraby Lane - College gates to Beech Grove 1349 U £6,745 Complete

Castle Annetwell / Finkle St & Castle St Nth 2819 U £14,095 Complete

Castle Cecil St - Tait St to Warwick Road 2500 U £12,500 Complete

Belle-Vue Dobinson Road - Orton Road to Parham Grove 2012 U 10060 Complete

Morton Windermere Road - Wigton Road to Borrowdale 1119 U 5595 Complete

Belah Caird Av - Belah Road to Hartley Av 2117 U 10585 Complete

Castle Granville Road - Section between Granite Setts 903 U 4515 Complete

Castle Peel St & Caldbeck Rd - Wigton Rd to Newtown Rd 2969 U 14845 Complete

Belle-Vue Keld Road - Green Lane to Acredale Road 2051 U 10255 Complete

Newtown Road; Eastern Way; Great Orton Complete – these were in 2011/12 carry over beds.

£328,302

Budget cut-off

Page 147

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

HIGHWAY, DEVOLVED CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2012/13

TABLE 3 - CARRIAGEWAY STRUCTURAL SCHEMES

Road Number

Start Grid Ref

Finish Grid Ref

Location

Ward

Type of Work

Estimated Scheme

Cost

Cumulative

Estimated Scheme

Costs

Total Scheme

Length ( m )

Total Scheme Area

(m2)

Comments

C1043 340079 555495

339958 555419

Nelson Bridge Castle Structural inlay 87709 87709 155 2510 Complete

C1025 351834 581267

352071 580776

Bellevue to Cleughside

Bewcastle Overlay 32000 119709 390 1404 Complete

C1025 351456 582056

351560 581897

Stelshaw to Routledgeburn

Bewcastle Overlay 24000 143709 240 792 Complete

B6413 353015 561065

352984 561054

Brampton - Cobbles outside Post Office

Brampton Reconstruction 13519 157228 40 80

C1037 341294 550171

341197 551011

Red Cat towards Burthwaite - Phase

1

St Cuthbert Without

Overlay/Patching 88000 245228 500 2950

Complete

B6318 352044 575320

351841 574420

Roadhead Bewcastle Overlay/Patching 63000 308228 700 4060 Complete

C1005 345933 568503

345825 568446

The Barn to Priorigg Cottage

Hethersgill Inlay 16000 324228 90 585

Complete

U1095 349190 560966

347964 561428

Carlisle Airport jnc to U1094 jnc

Irthington Overlay/Patching 60000 384228 166 830 Complete

C1005 342513 566441

342590 566170

Burnside Bridge to Fergushill Cottage

Kirklinton Overlay / Patching 30000 414228 230 1150 Complete

U1070 Hespin Wood

Entance to C1022 Rockcliffe Inlay/Overlay 60000 474228

C1012 Newlands Farm

Junction Kirklinton Inlay 27000 501228

Page 148

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

HIGHWAY, DEVOLVED CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2012/13

TABLE 4 - MINOR STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE SCHEMES

Parish/Ward Road No Location Treatment Score Status Comments

Longtown & Bewcastle B5307 CNDR Roundabout towards Moorhouse Pre Patching SD 5

Longtown & Bewcastle B6318 Sleetbeck to Crossings Pre Patching SD 5

Brampton & Gilsland B6413 Brampton Centre Section 2 Pre Patching MA 5 Complete

Longtown & Bewcastle C1022 Asda to Harker

Pre patching MA 5

Location should be Parkhouse to Harker

junction. Condition of surface is beyond

Micro Surfacing treatment – will be

assessed for future scheme 2013/14

Yewdale C2051 Orton Road Carlisle Sandsfield Lonning to A595 Wigton Rd Pre Patching MA 5

Stanwix Urban B6264 Brampton Road - Stanwix Bank to Art College Pre Patching MA 5 Further investigation work required

Wetheral C1038 Scotby Village - A69 to Wellgate Pre Patching MA 5 Complete

Castle C1043 Victoria Viaduct - English St to James St Pre Patching MA 5 Complete

Upperby C1037 Scalegate Road - Ridley Road to Lamb St Pre Patching MA 5 Complete

Longtown & Bewcastle C1016 Rockcliffe Village Pre Patching MA 5 Complete

Belle Vue Acredale Road - B5307 to 12 Kirkstead Road Pre Patching MA 5

Belah Dene Crescent - Brackenridge to Briar Bank Pre Patching MA 5

Castle Dacre Road - Devonshire Walk to West Tower St Pre Patching SD 5

Belle Vue Acredale Rd & Birchdale - Kirkstead to Kells Road Pre Patching MA 5

Harraby Crossways - Edgehill Rd to Hilary Grove Pre Patching MA 5

Longtown & Bewcastle U1060 Burnfoot Road Pre Patching SD 4.5 Complete

Longtown & Bewcastle U1062 Sandysike to Longtown Church (Sandysike to Hornickhill - Hornickhill to church)

Pre Patching SD 4.5

A section of this is no longer suitable for

surface dressing and will be assessed for

future scheme

Dalston & Cummersdale

C1040 Beech Farm to Cumwhinton Road Pre Patching SD 4.5

Complete

Currock Coney St - Adelphi Terrace to Currock Park Av Pre Patching MA 4

Page 149

Parish/Ward Road No Location Treatment Score Status Comments

Castle Abbots Road - Bedford Road to Crummock Road Pre Patching MA 4

Castle Bedford Road - Between Granite Setts Pre Patching MA 4

Castle Portland Sq - Brunswick St to Alfred St Pre Patching MA 4

Longtown & Bewcastle C1001 Junct C1006 to The Moat (CJS) Pre Patching SD 4

Longtown & Bewcastle C1004 Windyhill to The Crossings (CJS) Pre Patching SD 4 Complete

Stanwix & Irthington C1005 Prior Rigg / Waingatehead junction (CJS) Pre Patching SD 4 Complete

Longtown & Bewcastle C1005 Fergushill to Burnside Bridge Pre Patching SD 4

Being undertaken within Carriageway

Structural Schemes

Wetheral C1038 (Wetheral Pastures - B6263 junc to U1168 Cotehill Junc (CJS) Pre Patching SD 4

Complete

Wetheral C1040 Cumwhinton to Cotehill Pre Patching SD 4 Complete

Stanwix & Irthington U1044 Kirkcambeck to Cays House (CJS) Pre Patching SD 4

Stanwix & Irthington U1045 Patties Hill to Longrigg (CJS) Pre Patching SD 4

Stanwix & Irthington U1046 Whitegate Cottage to Gibbs Hill (CJS) Pre Patching SD 4

Longtown & Bewcastle U1279 Crofthead Pre Patching SD 4

Patching & preparation of carriageway for future years surface treatment works £434,878

Small scale permanent carriageway repairs £291,000

Sealing of small areas of carriageway using sprayed bitumen & chippings £75,000

Complete

Additional patching required to "tidy up" 2012/13 surface dressing & micro-asphalt beds due to anticipated further deterioration during winter £100,000 £100,000

Complete

£900,878

Page 150

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE HIGHWAY, DEVOLVED CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2012/13

TABLE 5 - FOOTWAY SCHEMES

Priority

Maintained by

Road Number

Location

Work

Estimated Works

Cost £

Cumulative

Scheme Cost

£

Length of

Treatment M

Average Footway

Width M

Score 11/12

Score

Status

Comments

1 County C1040 Cumwhinton Rd - No 78 to No 52

Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge

25,949 25,949 150 2.7 N/A 168

Complete

2 County C1020 Cumwhinton - Pub towards Scotby Relay Bitmac 13,439 39,388 70 2.00 N/A 164

Complete

3 City

Edgehill Road - Springfield Road to Allandale Road Inlay/Overlay 22,748 62,136 151 2.75 99 155

4 County C2051 Orton Rd - Inglewood to No 41

Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge 16,035 78,171 110 2.50 N/A 153.5

Complete

5 City

Whinsmoor Drive - East side only Relay Bitmac 20,128 98,299 380 2.00 N/A 133

6 County C1045

Eastern Way Cycle Way - Carlisle Window System to Toucan Relay Bitmac 11,544 109,843 85 2.00 N/A 128.5

Complete

7 County A69

Victoria Place / Spencer Street junction Relay Bitmac 6,723 116,566 40 2.50 N/A 128

8 County C1045

Eastern Way Cycle Way - London Rd to Surgery Access Relay Bitmac 6,850 123,416 40 3.00 N/A 126

Complete

9 County C2051

Orton Road - (Opp 91 to number 116)

Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge 17,087 140,503 114 2.20 90 112.5

Complete

10 County A7

Stanwix Bank - Cricket Club to St Georges Crescent

Relay Flags and Bitmac Driveway X-overs 22,833 163,336 150 3.50 N/A 97.5

11 City

Portland Place - Botchergate to Cecil Street (both sides)

Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge 28,052 191,388 250 2.50 N/A 84

12 City

Greystone Road - Brunton Avenue to Bend

Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge 28,747 220,135 150 2.50 81 82.5

Page 151

13 City

Fusehill Street - Broad Street to College first entrance

Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge 17,861 237,996 80 3.50 72 75.5

Complete

Priority

Maintained by

Road Number

Location

Work

Estimated

Works Cost

£

Cumulative

Scheme Cost

£

Length of

Treatment M

Average

Footway Width

M

Score 11/12

Score

Status

Comments

14 County C1037

Upperby Road - (No 52 to Junct Embleton Road)

Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge 20,561 258,557 159 2.20 62 74

15 City

Lismore Place - Strand Rd to Victoria Place (East side)

Relay Flags and Bitmac Verge 18,304 276,861 140 2.00 N/A 69.5

Complete

16 City

Strand Road, Georgian Way to Trinity Sports Centre

Relay/replace sandstone flags 14562 291423

Complete

Budget cut-off

Page 152

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

HIGHWAY, DEVOLVED CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2012/13

TABLE 6 - DRAINAGE AND REMEDIAL EARTHWORKS PROGRAMME

Ref

D (Drainage)

R (Remedial

Earthworks)

Road

Grid Ref

Location

Comments

Estimated

Scheme Cost

Status

Comments

1 D Various Various Low Crosby Fit flap valves to river outfalls to

prevent back up leading to fluvial flooding

£3,000

2 R U1205 353871 / 556231

Greenwell Village Collapse of road side verge £22,514 Complete

3 D C1024 Various Toppin Castle Waterlogged carriageway sub grade

causing surface degradation £6,400

4 D C1031 357850 / 559480

Old School House, Hallbankgate

Flooding in dip causing flooding to carriageway, flooding property.

£24,770

5 D U1098 350033 / 562798

Newtown Village Flooding of carriageway in dip - affects

property £14,582 Complete

6 D C1039 352103 / 550342

Hornsby Gate - Nr Carlatten

Washed out headwall £9,571

Budget cut-off

Page 153

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

HIGHWAY, DEVOLVED CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2012/13

TABLE 7 - LIGHTING SCHEME PROGRAMME

Road Number Location Description of Works Estimated Cost

Status

Comments

A7 Scotland Road - Etterby Street - Waverly Road

Refurbish 8m columns and convert full length to white light & night dimming £25,344

C1036 St Nicholas Street/ Blackwell Road (Woodrouffe Terrace - Currock Road)

Refurbish 8m columns and convert to white light with night dimming £25,000

C1016 Etterby Street (Scotland Road - Etterby Road)

Refurbish 8m columns and convert to white light with night dimming £22,582

B5299 Dalston Road (Cemetery/ Pirelli area)

Refurbish 8m columns and convert full length of 40mph to white light with night dimming £9,592

B5299 Carlisle Road/ Square Dalston Refurbish 8m columns and convert to white light with night dimming £38,237

C1043 Cumwhinton Road (London Road-Edgehill Road)

Refurbish 8m columns convert full length to Garlands to white light with night dimming £8,000

A6 London Road (B&Q - Harraby Inn

Refurbish columns and convert length Crown Street - Cumwhinton Road to white light with night dimming £9,592

Holmrook Road Refurbish columns and convert to white

light with night dimming £13,500

Queensway Refurbish columns and convert to white

light with night dimming £21,500

Crosshill Drive Refurbish columns and convert to white

light with night dimming £15,000

Total £188,347

Page 154

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

HIGHWAY, DEVOLVED CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2012/13

TABLE 8 - TRAFFIC SIGNALS PROGRAMME 2012-16

Road No Phase Cost Status

Comments

A6 Carlisle City Centre - Lowther Street £35,000

Budget cut-off

Page 155

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

HIGHWAY, DRAFT, DEVOLVED CAPITAL PROGRAM 2012/13

TABLE 9 - MINOR HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS

Road No

Scheme Title Ward Description LTP3 Score

Estimated Cost

Status Running total

Status

Comments

C1036

Blackwell Road -

Pedestrian Build Outs

Currock

Construction of Build Outs at Junction of Blackwell

Road/Henderson Road and associated waiting

restrictions. Scheme source 2007 APM List

36.5 £5,000 Approved at

Local Committee 15/09/11

£5,000

C1013 Hurley Road

Footpath Stanwix Rural

Construction of footway and introduction of priority traffic flows Scheme source 2007

APM List

36 21,000 Consultation and Outline design

complete £26,000

Complete

Various Minor Local

Safety Schemes

Various

Minor safety improvements at sites identified by CRASH

Group Neighbourhood Forum etc EG Hethersgill,

Kirkland Corner etc. Schemes to be progressed

as per MLSS protocol

£12,000

Some sites identified and investigation

ongoing

£38,000

Various

Traffic Variation

Order Carlisle 2012(1)

Various

Various outstanding Issues minor amendments

throughout Carlisle Area - including Lonsdale St

£10,000 Awaiting Local

Committee Approval

£48,000

Complete

Various

Traffic Variation

Order Carlisle 2012(2)

Castle / St Aidans

Zone A/C amendments postponed from 2011/12

£15,000

Outline design complete. Partially

considered by LC 2011/12 but

decision postponed for

further consideration

£63,000

Various Traffic

Variation Order 2012(3)

Castle/Belle Vue/Denton

Holme Zone D/E Review £10,000

Awaiting Local Committee Approval

£73,000

Page 156

Road No

Scheme Title Ward Description LTP3 Score

Estimated Cost

Status Running total

Status

Comments

C1019 Speed

Restriction - Scotby

Wetheral

Extension of 30mph limit on Wetheral road out of Scotby

Neighbourhood Forum Referal

44 £5,000

Approved for Consultation at

Local Committee 15/09/11

£78,000

Complete

A7 Longtown

South Speed Limit Review

Longtown and Bewcastle

Extend 30mph limit to building line on south approach to Longtown

Implementation of speed limit from speed limit review

as detailed above

30.5 £11,000

Approval to consult from

Local Committee 01/11/11.

£89,000

Order with ‘Connect Roads’

A7

J44 to Blackford

Crossroads Speed Limit

Review

Longtown and Bewcastle

Introduce 50mph limit between J44 and Blackford.

Implementation of speed limit from speed limit review

as detailed above

36 16,000

Approval to consult from

Local Committee 01/11/11.

£105,000

Order with ‘Connect Roads’

Various Speed in Villages

Various

Introduction of speed limits and improvement of

regulation of speed in villages

£20,000

Villages identified for investigation

through Neighbourhood Forum process include Crosby

on Eden etc

£125,000

Budget cut-off

Page 157

Appendix 9.3

Briefing Note

Title of Briefing: Currock Bridge Project Progress Date: 08 February 2013 Author: Victoria Foster Unit / Directorate: Highways and Transport, Environment Audience: Carlisle HTWG

1. Background

As Currock Bridge was identified as a Priority Transport Improvement Scheme, funding was allocated to the project in 2012/13 to develop the scheme ready for implementation in future years. This paper has been compiled to summarise the work undertaken to date to progress the scheme design and cost estimates. 2. Current Situation

A range of route options have been developed and a public consultation event took place in July 2012. Generally, there was overall support for the ‘preferred’ route (Option 3) described below.

Option 3 - The new bridge would be located approximately 250m to the south of the existing footbridge and the existing bridge would be removed. On the west side of the railway line, the new structure would include a long straight structural ramp sloping up towards the bridge and would permit shared use of both pedestrians and cyclists.

£37,690 was allocated to the scheme from the Transport Capital Programme in 2012/13 to progress the scheme. Approximately £7,500 of this has been spent on identifying a preferred option and developing the design to date.

Scheme design To progress the scheme design further there is a requirement to prepare a Consultant’s brief to develop of the scheme to a stage ready to commence the planning process. To develop the design to this stage, the Consultant will be required to undertake a range of surveys on land owned by Network Rail. Network rail stipulate that before any surveys or work on their land can commence, Cumbria County Council must enter into a Basic Asset Protection Agreement (BAPA). This agreement ensures that Network Rail commit a ‘project sponsor’ to the project to act as a liaison officer between CCC and Network Rail. The cost of this agreement to CCC is understood to be in the region of £25,000.

Page 158

The funding already allocated to the project to progress this scheme in 2012/13 is insufficient to enter into a BAPA agreement and to appoint a consultant to undertake all the required survey and design work ready for a planning application. Scheme Cost Estimate Outline scheme costs were originally been estimated at £973,000 in December 2009 by Carlisle City Council. Since the date of this estimate, further costs and inflation place the scheme cost estimate at around £2 million. This estimate is supported by information from a similar scheme delivered by Swindon Borough Council at a cost of £1.7million in 2010, which did not include land purchase/ land dedications or demolition of an existing structure. Without the development of a preliminary design, a more accurate cost estimate can not be ascertained. 3 Summary

In view of the current low level of funding allocated to develop the proposals and the costs likely to be incurred to undertake the preliminary design and secure planning consent, Members should note the following:

• no further work can be progressed until additional funding for design work is committed to the scheme,

• all funding committed to the scheme in 2012/13 will not be spent,

• early scheme estimates are underestimated and scheme costs are thought to be in the region of £2 million,

• scheme cost estimates will be revised when further design work is undertaken

• scheme funding in 2013/14 is still to be determined (the scheme is identified as a possible scheme within the Devolved Major Schemes budget. The final programme of schemes within this budget will be determined in July 2013).

Version 0.1 February 2013

Page 159

Appendix 10

Briefing

Number of Briefing: CA12/06 Title of Briefing: Working Group Briefing

February 2013 Date: February 2013 Author: Kevin Walsh Unit / Directorate: Highways and Transport, Environment Audience: Carlisle HCarlisle HCarlisle HCarlisle H&TWG&TWG&TWG&TWG

1.0 Background There are a number of highways & transport issues that could be of interest to members some of which may become of greater importance and may require decisions by the Local Committee in due course. This Briefing Note identifies these and provides a short summary of information on each so that members have early sight of the potential problems and opportunities for the Committee. No action is considered necessary at present but members’ views are sought and an informal discussion of these issues may be helpful. 2.0 Key Issues

1. Staffing Changes

Members may wish to note that Marina Lillie has now left the Authority. Arrangements for the Working Group are now being undertaken by Sara Connor.

2. Carlisle City Transfer of Highways Operations Arrangements are well in hand for the transfer of operations presently undertaken by the City Council under Highways Claimed Rights. All transferring staff have had an opportunity for a “One to One” with us. The Dalston Depot is being prepared to manage the operational teams and space has been identified at the Parkhouse Building for the technical staff. We are working with colleagues in the City Highways Teams to prepare the work programmes from 1st April 2013.

3. Traffic calming on Radial Routes after opening of CNDR Members will have seen the recent publicity following the first year anniversary of the opening of CNDR. You will also recall that Connect Roads are preparing proposals for Traffic Calming on the adversely affected roads. A meeting was held with Burgh Road residents in early February and a further report will be provided for Local Committee on the 28th March 2013

Kevin Walsh Area Highways and Transport Manager

Page 160

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Corporate Director - Environment

THE IMPACT OF CNDR – TRAFFIC CALMING

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report updates members on the progress of the Traffic Calming proposals aimed at mitigating the impact of changes to traffic movements following the opening of the Carlisle Northern Development Route (CNDR).

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 The development of these projects will assist the County Council to achieve the objectives set out in the Local Transport Plan (LTP3). It will also aid the Council to work towards its Council Plan priorities, which are

Ø challenging poverty in all its forms;

Ø ensuring that the most vulnerable people in our communities receive the support they need; and

Ø improving the chances in life of the most disadvantaged in Cumbria.

2.2 At present no Equality impact assessment has been carried out on these issues but these will be undertaken as individual projects are developed.

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 That the Local Committee agree to progress the statutory and community consultations noted in Paragraph 4.3.

Agenda Item 8

Page 161

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 Members will recall that public meetings to discuss traffic calming issues were held in November 2012 in the Belle Vue area and in Stanwix. These were very successful and gave the officers and consultants present much relevant information. A further meeting was held with Burgh Road residents in February 2013.

4.2 Parsons Brinckerhoff on behalf of Connect Roads has now produced a comprehensive report on the outcomes of the consultation. The Executive Summary of this report is provided at Appendix 1.

4.3 Members will note that a number of proposals (Options) are suggested for consideration. The Carlisle Local Practice Team have considered these and would recommend that the following consultations be arranged

4.3.1 Speed limit alterations as described below require statutory consultation. The outcomes of the consultations will be reported back through the local committee process for determination.

a) Reduce the Speed limit on Moorhouse Road between the CNDR Roundabout and the existing 30mph to 40mph

b) Reduce the Speed limit on Orton Road between the CNDR Roundabout and the existing 30mph to 40mph

c) Reduce the Speed Limit on Sandsfield Road between the CNDR Roundabout and Orton Road to 40 mph

4.3.2 The point at which the these new speed limits change from 40 to 30 mph and the existing one on Burgh Road would be provided with “Gateway” features to strengthen their impact.

4.3.3 Footway Build-outs to provide for Priority Working at appropriate places on Burgh Road do not require statutory consultation but consultations will be required with local residents to agree the most appropriate placement of such traffic calming features.

4.4 Members will recall that concerns have also been expressed with regard the impact of the opening of CNDR on Brampton Road. There has been a significant reduction in traffic on this road. The impact is twofold; the reduced traffic may be resulting in more vehicles travelling over the speed limit and those HGV’s that continue to use the road to access the City have proportionally higher impact.

4.5 Two proposals are being considered to alleviate these issues. Firstly the alteration of the Advance Direction Sign on the A689 eastern approach to Linstock Roundabout to advise drivers that the North & West of Carlisle and West Cumbria can be accessed along the CNDR via M6 Junction 44.

4.6 Secondly consideration is being given to whether the introduction of further pedestrian refuges or cycle lanes on Brampton Road might alleviate some of the concerns of local residents. A further report on this aspect of the traffic calming work will be brought to the Working Group in due course.

Page 162

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 The proposals in this report are aimed at starting a formal consultation process. Further options may result from this next stage of development and these will be reported to members in due course.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 There are no direct costs from Local Committee funds involved in these projects.

6.2 The Traffic Calming project is funded from the CNDR Contract arrangements.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 There are no legal implications at this stage but Local Committee, in deciding whether to implement the restrictions detailed in paragraph 3 of this Report will need to take into take into consideration the matters contained in Section 122(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 which are more specifically referred to at paragraph 7.2 of this Report. For the reason specified at section 1(1)(a) of the 1984 Act, namely for avoiding danger to persons or other traffic using the road or for preventing the likelihood of any such danger arising.

7.2 Under Section 122(2), the matters which Local Committee must take into account in exercising that duty are: -

a) the desirability of securing and maintaining reasonable access to premises;

b) the effect on amenities of an area; c) the national air quality strategy prepared under section 80 of the

Environment Act 1995; d) the importance of facilitating the passage of public service vehicles

and of securing the safety and convenience of persons using or desiring to use such vehicles; and

e) any other matters appearing to the authority to be relevant.

7.3 Section 90G of the Highways Act 1980 provides the power to carry out traffic calming works as detailed in paragraph 4 of this Report.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 This report informs members of progress with managing the impact of the opening of the CNDR. It recommends that a series of statutory and community consultations are commenced with the outcomes being reported to a future meeting of the committee.

Andrew Moss Assistant Director- Highways and Transportation 1 March 2013

Page 163

APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Executive Summary of Parsons Brinkerhoff VNDR Traffics Calming Report Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle

Executive Decision No

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? No

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

Yes* No* N/A*

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

No N/A

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? No N/A

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the

expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and necessary approvals have been obtained.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] Carlisle Highways & Transport Working Group noted progress at meeting on 9 January 2013. CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY If a matter has been considered by Overview and Scrutiny, this section should give details of meeting dates and any Scrutiny recommendations. If not, state “Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny”.

Page 164

BACKGROUND PAPERS CNDR Traffic Calming Report, Connect Roads, February 2013 Note: Executive Summary provided as part of this report. The full report is available for members should they require a copy. REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Kevin Walsh, 01228 221386 and [email protected]

Page 165

Page 166

Appendix 1 CNDR Traffic Calming CNDR Traffic Calming Report.docx Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff February 2013 for Connect Roads EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to assess the traffic impact on the radial routes adjoining the newly constructed Carlisle Northern Development Route (CNDR). This report is intended to identify the roads experiencing an increase in traffic volumes, the traffic problems associated with the change in traffic flows and outline possible traffic improvement options. The public consultation with the residents of Belle Vue and Brampton Road has been pivotal in identifying the perceived traffic issues. Six supplementary 24hr temporary static traffic count sites were undertaken for the seven day period between 10 November and 16 November 2012 to ascertain traffic volumes, vehicle classification and vehicle speeds. A seventh 24hr temporary static traffic count site was undertaken on Burgh Road, 100m within the 30mph speed limit between 24 January and 7 February 2013. The result of the traffic counts are summarised in Section 2 of this report. The majority of the residents attending the consultations perceived vehicles travelling at speeds exceeding the speed limit. However, the supplementary traffic count 85 percentile data indicates that the majority of the vehicles were travelling at speeds close to the speed limit. The public consultation held for the residents of Belle Vue on Wednesday 28 November 2012, at the Church of the Nazarene was attended by 82 residents. 54 of these residents attending completed the Roads and Traffic questionnaire. The details of the consultation are contained in Section 3 of this report. 70% of those completing the questionnaire were of the opinion that traffic had increased in the local area, following the implementation of the CNDR. 72% perceived the CNDR as being a positive development and 72% felt traffic calming measures were required in their area, particularly on Burgh Road. The public consultation held for the residents of Brampton Road and the northern half of Carlisle on Thursday 29 November 2012, at the Stanwix Primary School had 31 attendees. 29 of these residents attending completed the Roads and Traffic questionnaire. The details of the consultation are contained in Section 4 of this report. 62% of those completing the questionnaire were of the opinion that traffic had increased in the local area, following the implementation of the CNDR. 79% perceived the CNDR as being a positive development and 59% felt traffic calming measures were required in their area, particularly on Brampton Road. Based on the supplementary traffic count figures, resident comments and observations made on site, it is concluded that traffic calming measures are primarily only warranted for Burgh Road, to address the significant increase in traffic volumes resulting from the CNDR. Five possible traffic calming options are proposed:

Page 167

• Option 1: Constructing a gateway feature on Burgh Road at the existing 30mph speed limit start.

• Option 2: Construct footway build-outs to narrow carriageway at three possible locations.

• Option 3: Reduce speed limit to 40mph on Moorhouse Road and Orton Road.

• Option 4: Reduce carriageway width with white lining to standardise lane widths on Moorhouse Road.

• Option 5: Implement voluntary one-way routing of HGVs from the Burgh Road Industrial Estate, such that HGVs travel westbound along Burgh Road to access the CNDR and eastbound along Moorhouse Road to access the Burgh Road Industrial Estate from the CNDR.

Page 168

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Corporate Director - Environment

VIADUCT ESTATE S278 CYCLE LINK – FUNDING OPTIONS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1. This report has been prepared to advise the Local Committee of a grant made by the Department for Transport to part fund cycle improvement works on the Viaduct Estate Road. The report details the implications of the grant and work that would be required to be carried out to enable progress with the scheme.

2. STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1. The proposals in this report support the delivery of Community Strategy and Cumbria Agreement outcomes and Council Plan priorities, which are

Ø challenging poverty in all its forms;

Ø ensuring that the most vulnerable people in our communities receive the support they need; and

Ø improving the chances in life of the most disadvantaged in Cumbria.

The proposals aim to achieve these by contributing to achieving the County Council’s aspirations for Cumbria. In particular for the environment by providing options for sustainable and economical alternative forms of transport into and across the city centre, and by helping to encourage people to have an independent and healthy life. Providing economical forms of transport into the city centre also contributes to the County Council’s aspiration for Cumbria to have a thriving economy.

In addition to the above the scheme also aids the County Council to achieve aims of the Local Transport Plan LTP3. By providing improvement to Cycling and Walking links the scheme will provide the opportunity for increased use of these more sustainable forms of

Agenda Item 9

Page 169

transport thus helping to reduce congestion, and improving air quality. It should however be noted that the gains from this scheme are only likely to be small.

2.2. No specific equality impact assessment has been carried out for this scheme. The scheme addresses access issues that have been highlighted. Improvements to the existing narrow footway to the North end of Viaduct Estate will improve access to the estate for all people.

3. RECOMMENDATION

3.1 That the Local Committee resolves to apply for the grant of £40,000 to contribute to this scheme and agrees to progress the scheme to completion by March 2014.

3.2 That the Local Committee resolves to commence formal consultation to make the necessary changes to the existing one way traffic regulation order to provide an exemption for cyclists travelling in a northerly direction.

4. BACKGROUND

4.1. As part of the Connect 2 Bid some years ago Carlisle City Council submitted a number of schemes to Sustrans for funding. These included connecting the Caldew Cycleway to Castleway via the Viaduct Estate Ramp.

4.2. The Local Committee will be aware that a report advising on the development of this scheme was considered at it’s meeting on 12th December 2012. At the recommendation of the Highways Working Group a decision to progress the scheme was deferred pending a review on completion of the new cycle ramp to the north side of Castleway which will be funded from the S106 monies from the Sainsbury’s Development.

4.3. The DfT recently announced a £62 million government investment to make Cycling more attractive for people in England. £15 million of that funding was available to boost the Community Linking Places Fund that supports schemes that in part encourage community cycling. It appears that Sustrans who are the awarding body for this funding submitted the Viaduct Estate Ramp Improvement scheme as part of a package of schemes for funding in Cumbria. The overall value of the grant is in excess of £340,000. £40,000 is for the Viaduct Estate Ramp scheme.

4.4. The conditions of the grant are :

4.4.1 That the scheme must be complete by the end of March 2014.

4.4.2 That the scheme must be match funded at a minimum level of 30% of the DfT Grant. In this case that sum would need to be a minimum of £12,000. Initial assessment of the scheme indicates that the work on Castleway proposed by The City Council which includes enhancements to the planters adjacent to the top of the ramp, enabling an improvement in visibility, would justify a contribution at this level.

Page 170

4.5. An outline design for the scheme has been completed and its detail is shown on the plan contained in Appendix 1

4.6. A Road Safety note has been prepared for the scheme. The issue of inter-visibility between pedestrians and cyclists at the top of the ramp has been raised. This cannot be designed to meet current standards without very significant expense but Members are advised the proposed scheme would significantly improve the present situation. There are no issues raised in the note that cannot be addressed during the detail design stage of the scheme.

4.7. Two areas of risk have been identified with the scheme. These are that a small strip of land currently owned by Network Rail is required to complete the crossing point at the south end of the scheme. Enquiries have been made to Network Rail who owns the land. The intention is to request that an agreement is entered into with Network Rail to dedicate a strip of land as highway to facilitate the scheme. The second is that in order for cyclists to ride up the ramp it will be necessary to change the existing one way traffic order. It will require early consultation to achieve this within the required time scales.

4.8. Members are also advised that there are proposals to carry out public realm improvements in the area as a result of planning conditions placed upon the new Sainsbury store in Caldewgate. Discussions with City Council officers suggest that elements of the scheme could be incorporated within these proposals and as such it is felt that it would be appropriate to use contributions from the funding for the S106 Public Realm works to support the implementation of this scheme.

4.9. It is also noted that there has been a request through the Castle Neighbourhood Forum for improvements for pedestrians between the Viaduct Estate and Castleway. The scheme shown on the plan in Appendix 1 will address the issues that were raised.

5. OPTIONS

5.1. The Local Committee can resolve to apply for the grant and progress the scheme to completion by March 2014

5.2. The Local Committee may resolve to take no further action on this matter relying on the previous decision to allow the ramp to the North side of Castleway to be constructed and to monitor the effects of this before proceeding further. It should be noted that it is possible that funding for the Viaduct Estate ramp is unlikely to be available in the future.

6. RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1. An outline estimate has been prepared for this scheme. Based on outline design work the suggested scheme cost is in the region of £50,000.

6.2. Proposed funding for the scheme comprises:

6.2.1. Grant from DfT Community Linking Spaces Fund £40,000 max

Page 171

6.2.2. Contribution from Sainsbury’s S106 Public Realm Enhancement funding £12,000

6.3. Total contribution £52,000 max.

6.4. The funding mechanism for the grant is such that payment of the funding will be made on completion of the scheme. Failure to complete the scheme within the time constraints will result in no payment being made. Any costs incurred at that time would have to be met by the County Council.

7. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1. There are no direct legal implications arising from this Report.

8. CONCLUSION

8.1. At present there is no requirement from the Conditions of the Planning Consent for Tesco for the County Council to carry out the outstanding works detailed in the S278 Agreement.

8.2. It is understood that the scheme for a ramp under Caldew Bridges to the North side of Castleway will in part address the continuity of the Cycleway but it does not help pedestrians and cyclists wishing to access the city centre.

8.3. The scheme for the Viaduct Estate ramp will address all the outstanding issues and allow the completion of a link for pedestrians and cyclists between the south west side of the city and the city centre.

Andrew Moss Assistant Director – Highways and Transport

March 2013

APPENDICES Appendix 1 Viaduct Estate Improvements – General Arrangement Plan Electoral Divisions: Castle

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

Page 172

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

No

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? No

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the

expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and necessary approvals have been obtained.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] Minute 52 Carlisle Local Committee February 2009 Minute 95(3) Carlisle Local Committee December 2012 CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny. BACKGROUND PAPERS No background papers. REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Kevin Crawley – Traffic Management Engineer.

E-mail [email protected] Tel - 01228 221766

Page 173

Page 174

This page is intentionally left blank

Page 175

Page 176

This page is intentionally left blank

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Corporate Director – Adult and Local Services

DENTON HOLME LIBRARY OPENING HOURS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Following feedback from the Library Review the library service are looking at the opening times of all Libraries to make them available at times people want to use them.

1.2 As a result of consultation with current library and Community Centre users at Denton Holme it is proposed to change the existing opening hours and improve access to the library’s services The proposals also help address health and safety issues relating to the staff. Members are asked to note and approve the change.

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 It is County Council Policy that any proposed changes in Library Service opening hours are brought to the relevant Local Committee.

2.2 There are no additional budgetary implications attached to these proposals.

2.3 Although the pattern is being altered, the overall opening hours are not being reduced and the Library will offer an improved opportunity for all sections of the community to enjoy access to library services.

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 Members are recommended to approve the new opening hours for Denton Holme Library. The hours are:

Agenda Item 10

Page 177

Existing Opening Hours

AM PM Hours

Monday --- 2pm to 4pm 2

Tuesday --- 2pm to 4pm 2

Wednesday 10am to 12 noon 2pm to 4pm 4

Thursday --- 4pm to 6pm 2

Friday Closed

Saturday Closed

TOTAL 10

Proposed Opening Hours

AM PM Hours

Monday 2pm to 4pm 2

Tuesday 2pm to 4pm 2

Wednesday 11pm to 3pm 4

Thursday 3pm to 5pm 2

Friday Closed

Saturday Closed

TOTAL 10

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 Denton Holme Library is one of a number of libraries in Carlisle based in a Community Centre and works closely with the Centre to deliver a service to the whole community.

4.2 The opening times of Denton Holme have grown up in an ad hoc way and have not been revised for many years. On occasions like the period between 5 and 6 on a Thursday very few people use the service and there are no activities in the Centre. At other times like the lunch period on Wednesday there are a range of well attended activities in the Centre where many of the people would find the Library a useful service. The new hours generally would provide a better use of the 10 hours opening times. The proposed new hours would continue to suit class visits from Robert Fergusson School and would provide opportunities after school to use the libraries

4.3 We are concerned about the health and safety situation on a Thursday evening where the Centre is unstaffed and our member of staff needs to control and lock the building. We do not have the resources to double staff the library and it is a time when the library receives little or no use.

4.4 As with library services across the County we will continue to monitor use and demand for the service and if in the future these patterns change we will revisit opening times to ensure they fit the needs of the community.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 Members are agree the changes to opening hours

Page 178

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 There are no financial implications for the Library Service

6.2 The performance of Denton Holme Library will continue to be monitored and if necessary changes made to times, with the committee’s approval.

6.3 This proposal offers value for money as services to the public are being revised, in line with the results of public consultation, within existing resources.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 Part 5, paragraph 28 of the Constitution places an executive function on the Local Committee to name and determine the opening hours of local libraries. The Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964, section 7, puts on the County Council a duty to “provide a comprehensive and efficient library service for all persons desiring to make use thereof”. Members will need to have regard to this duty when approving, rejecting or amending the library opening hours.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 The proposed changes will better meet the needs of the community by having the Library open at times when it is most likely to be used and will promote closer working with the Community Centre and its users.

Richard Parry Corporate Director of Adult and Local Services

March 2013

APPENDICES No appendices Electoral Division: Denton Holme

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Page 179

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

N/A

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? N/A

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the

expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and necessary approvals have been obtained.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny. BACKGROUND PAPERS No background papers REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Mike Lister, Area Library Manager, Carlisle 01228 227320 [email protected]

Page 180

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Chief Executive

COMMUNITIES BUDGET 2013/14

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This paper sets out the budget for 2013/14 as set by Cabinet and Council and seeks confirmation from the Local Committee on identifying key allocations and commitments for the 2013/14 year.

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 This report provides detail on the budget allocations for Carlisle Local Committee and is based upon guidance for the use of those allocations from the Executive, in line with the Council Plan and the 2013/14 Budget agreed by Council on 14 February 2013. It also builds on the Cabinet decision on 7 February 2013 where the Local Committee allocations, criteria and devolved responsibilities were approved.

2.2 In 2011 the Council agreed a new Council Plan. In this Council Plan for 2011–2014 the Council has made a clear commitment to being as effective and efficient as possible, and this objective underpins the priorities of:

· challenging poverty in all its forms;

· ensuring the most vulnerable people in our communities receive the support they need; and

· improving the chances in life of the most disadvantaged in Cumbria

2.3 There are no equality implications arising from this report.

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 That £129,772, the full Neighbourhood Support Budget, is allocated to the funding of the Area Support Team for 2013/14

Agenda Item 11

Page 181

3.2 That £53,890, the full Money Advice – CAB Budget, is allocated to the provision of money advice through the contract with the CAB.

3.3 That either £29,568 (Option A) or £22,208 (Options B) from the total Local Committee’s discretionary fund is allocated to fund the provision of School Crossing Patrols in the Carlisle area to cover the 8 sites or the 6 sites not having vacancies, be set as the budget for School Crossing Patrols.

3.4 That £147,770, from the total Local Committee’s discretionary fund is initially allocated to 0-19 Services budget.

3.5 That 40%, £59,108 of the 0-19 services budget be allocated to Electoral Division Community grants funds on the basis of the 0-19 populations.

3.6 That £70,000, from the total Local Committee’s discretionary fund is allocated to Community Grants (Neighbourhood Forum Grants) and be allocated across the 18 Electoral Divisions based on the population of the Electoral Divisions.

3.7 That £10,000, from the total Local Committee’s discretionary fund is allocated for a Carlisle Wide Grants fund.

3.8 That the remaining balance from the Local Committee’s discretionary fund is allocated to General Provision funding.

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 The proposed budgets as they relate to Local Committees were presented to the Leadership and Local Committees Chairs Meeting on 23rd January 2013. The process by which Local Committee budget allocations are determined, is that they are considered by County Council in total as part of the overall budget setting process, and individual allocations are agreed by Cabinet.

4.2 A number of changes were made to the Local Committee budgets in 2011/12. Local Committees were given greater flexibility on the use of their budgets, and restrictions on the ring fencing associated with specific budget lines was removed to a certain degree. This was further extended for 2012/13 and will be increased for 2013/14 to cover 0-19 services.

4.3 The changes to the Local Committee budgets include that all six of the Council’s Local Committees would see a cash reduction of 20% in relation to specific areas (0-19, general provision and school crossing patrol budget allocations). However, Local Committees have discretion to manage their budget within the cash limits hence it is for Local Committees to decide exactly how to support the delivery of local priorities with their available budgets.

4.4 The overall impact is to have a fewer number of different budget headings, clarity on the limitations on the use of budget headings and greater flexibility around other budget headings. Instead of the range of more complex and

Page 182

prescriptive budget lines previously delegated to Local Committees, there are now 5 revenue Community Budget lines only.

4.5 This report does not deal with the Highways Revenue budget or the Highways Capital Allocation. A separate report deals with these.

4.6 In summary, this report deals with the following:

General Provision; 0-19 Services; School Crossing Patrols; Money Advice Contract and Neighbourhood Support

4.7 There are a range of strategies, plans and policies which should assist in guiding the allocation of funds available to Local Committees. Indeed under the Constitution the Local Committee is bound to adhere to the County Council’s Policy Framework, composed of policies and plans agreed and adopted by Council as a whole. The primary document is the Council Plan 2011 – 2014. In developing the Area Plan data on the area and the key strategic projects and priorities have been outlined.

4.8 For each Electoral Division we have the data available through the Observatory along with our own knowledge of available assets alongside specific local needs. There are a large number of Parish and Parish Cluster Plans which also identify local needs and issues.

4.9 Other areas of consideration are the requirements outlined in the Constitution and through the budget setting process on the limitations of certain budgets and the need for Local Committee to identify the levels of funding available to support the community grants and community engagement.

4.10 In considering the options, Members are reminded of the restrictions to virements that are outlined in the referenced Council paper and summarised in Appendix 1.

4.11 In Appendix 2 is a summary of the Local Committee allocations.

4.12 Neighbourhood Support

4.13 A review of the functions of the Area Support Team was completed in 2010/11 and a revised staff structure put in place. The devolved budget line reflects the changes to the team and the reduction in the budget required. The costs of the team will fall within this new budget. Local Committee are recommended to confirm the entire budget as the allocation to the Area Support Team (£129,772).

4.14 Money Advice

4.15 Members will be aware that this budget line covers the costs of an existing contract. The funding is ring fenced for this purpose. It is recommended that Local Committee confirm the full allocation for the Money Advice contract locally (£53,890).

Page 183

4.16 General Provision, School Crossing Patrols and 0-19 Services

4.17 As already outlined Local Committee has the discretion to manage their budget within the cash limits and hence it is for Local Committee to decide exactly how to support the delivery of local priorities with their available budgets.

School Crossing Patrols

4.18 A portion of this total budget (£275,018) needs to be allocated to cover the costs associated with providing School Crossing Patrol (SCP) services. Whilst historically the School Crossing Patrol budget has been fully utilised a significant part has been spent on road safety improvements each year. The full year cost of the SCP service for the 8 locations where crossers have been identified would be around £40,566. Currently there are 4 vacancies, two of which have met the criteria to be disestablished in line with County policy. This would reduce the demand on funding to £29,568. It is recommended that £29,568 be allocated for SCP but reviewed regularly during the year. A copy of the Service Agreement is included at Appendix 3.

4.19 An alternative would be to not allocate funding for the two vacancies (Brampton & Newtown Rd). This would reduce the required allocation by 14h 30mins to 43hrs 45mins, £22,208. The allocation would be reduced to £22,208 and if vacancies are filled, funding could then be appropriately allocated during the year.

0 – 19 Services, Community Grants and General Provision

4.20 Previously the Local Committee has stressed its desire to allocate a portion of the 0-19 Services budget to each of the 17 (soon to be 18) Electoral Divisions. In setting the budget for 2012/13 this was considered as a preferred option but the legal advice overruled it. Since that time there has been a change to the Constitution which would enable the 0-19 Services fund to be distributed to each of the Electoral Divisions to be used alongside Neighbourhood Forum grants. However, there have also been changes to the Local Committee allocations that provide much more freedom to allocate funding. It is this element that needs to be explored.

4.21 Options were discussed with the Youth Working Group to establish some principles and these are presented here.

4.22 It is also worth recapping that once the School Crossing Patrols budget has been set, the Local Committee need to consider funding for the Neighbourhood Forum grants across the new 18 Electoral Divisions; the level of funding to be retained for use by Local Committee both for General Provision and any Area Wide grants allocation; and an allocation for 0-19 Services.

4.23 Reflecting on the last two years, the Working Group felt the use of the 0-19 Services budget from a central Local Committee held fund has worked well. In considering any possible apportionment between Local Committee held fund and the Electoral Divisions, consideration should be given to the broader flexibility now available, the fact that all the funding is now one

Page 184

discretional pot and the net result of creating what could be very small local budgets.

4.24 One approach discussed would be to retain a significant Local Committee held 0-19 Services budget and allocate similar levels of funding to the Community Grants budgets in each of the Electoral Divisions but emphasise that these local community grants budgets are also available for the local provision of 0-19 services as listed under the guidance used previously (Appendix 4). The allocations for the Community Grants to each Electoral Division could be made on the basis of an allocation for the all age population for the Division and an allocation for the 0-19 aged population.

4.25 An alternative approach is to allocate separate sums to each Electoral Division for general community grants and 0-19 services with the two budgets kept separate.

4.26 Population figures for the new Electoral Divisions are still being worked on but will be available soon. This will include the general populations and the 0-19 aged populations.

4.27 As a guide, in Appendix 5 is a possible allocation basis. There are a number of assumptions:

0-19 services are a priority and therefore the total funding available for 0-19 services should not be reduced from the 2012/13 level of £147,770

60% of the 0-19 service budget is retained at Local Committee and 40% is devolved to Electoral Divisions

The funding available for general Community Grants is reduced from £100,000 (2012/13) to £70,000 (2013/14).

£10,000 is retained at Local Committee for Area Wide grants

4.28 Whilst the Electoral Divisions and population figures shown in Appendix 5 are only indicative (and based on the Electoral Divisions to be phased out), Members will get the feel of the impact of the decisions:

4.29 To approve an overall 0-19 Services Budget of £147,770.

Carlisle Local Committee

Communities Budget 2013/14 Option A Option B

Allocations Allocations

Discretionary Spending Budget 275,018£ 275,018£

School Crossing Patrols 29,568£ 245,450£ 22,208£ 252,810£

0-19 Services 147,770£ 97,680£ 147,770£ 105,040£

Forum Grants 70,000£ 27,680£ 70,000£ 35,040£

Area Wide Grants 10,000£ 17,680£ 10,000£ 25,040£

Remainder for General Provision 17,680£ -£ 25,040£ -£

Page 185

4.30 To approve 60% of the 0-19 Services budget being retained at Local Committee level and that 40% (£59,108) be apportioned on the 0-19 population figures for each of the 18 Electoral Divisions.

4.31 To approve £70,000 being allocated to community grants and apportioned using the general population figures of the 18 Electoral Divisions.

4.32 That the general Community Grants budget allocation and the 0-19 allocation for each Electoral Division be used as a single Community Grants pot, targeting local issues and projects through one of the three methods of determining grants:

Through the view of a public meeting being provided to the determining officer for consideration

Through the view of a grants panel being provided to the determining officer for consideration

Through the view of the local Member(s) for the area concerned being provided to the determining officer for consideration

4.33 To approve £10,000 being earmarked from the remaining discretional fund for Area Wide Grants

4.34 To note that the remaining discretional fund will form the General Provision budget.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 The Working Group has considered the implications of the budget cuts and the greater freedom now available to Local Committee. On balance the recommendation is to approve retention of a fund for 0-19 Services at Local Committee level and to establish community grants budgets for each of the 18 Electoral Divisions based on a pro-rata allocation of funds to the general population and to the 0-19 population that can be used on local priorities or projects. Local Committee could agree to this or determine to allocate the funds on an alternative basis.

5.2 A further alternative is to defer decision on allocating the Local Committee budget until after the Elections. An impact of this would be that community groups enquiring about grants would be asked to make contact after mid June.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 County Council approved a Local Committee budget at its meeting of 14 February 2013 as outlined in the attached appendices.

6.2 Approval of the recommendations would fully allocate the Neighbourhood Support and Money Advice – CAB budgets to activities supporting these areas.

Page 186

6.3 The budget available for General Provision, 0-19 Services and School Crossing Patrols totals £275,018. The recommendations propose two alternative budget allocations, and these are outlined at paragraph 4.27. Option A would leave a balance of £17,680 available for future allocation against General Provision and Option B a balance of £25,040.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 Local committee budgets are delegated to Local Committees by Cabinet to enable them to perform the functions delegated to them by the Constitution.

7.2 In relation to recommendation 3.2, the Council is contractually obliged to pay the agreed sum under the Money Advice contract, of which the Local Committee’s allocation is part. It is a Local Committee function to support the development of debt rescue and money advice services across the area.

7.3 Recommendations 3.1. and 3.6 reflect previous legal advice provided relating to the operation of neighbourhood forums pursuant to pargraph 22 of part 5 of the Constitution.

7.4 Recommendations 3.4. and 3.5 are authorised by pargraph 24 of part 5 of the Constitution.

7.5 Recommendations 3.7 and 3.8 are authorised by paragraphs 17 and 18 of part 5 of the Constitution.

7.6 In relation to recommendation 3.3 of this Report, it is a Local Committee function to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of the County Council in relation to school crossing patrols pursuant to paragraph 16 of part 5 of the Constitution.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 The options for the allocation of the Local Committee budgets for 2013/14 were discussed with the Youth Working Group as the key element of setting the budget is the 0-19 Services allocation. The recommendations from the Working Group are presented for consideration.

Jill Stannard Chief Executive

21 February 2013

Page 187

APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Local Committee Budgets and Use, Countywide Appendix 2 – Local Committee Budgets approved by Council (2013/14) Appendix 3 – School Crossing Patrol Service Agreement Appendix 4 – Guidance on the 0-19 Services Budget Appendix 5 – Population breakdown/allocations for Community Grants Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

N/A

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? N/A

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS 14 February 2013 – County Council 7 February 2013 - Cabinet CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny. BACKGROUND PAPERS Draft Revenue Budget and Capital Programme – Cabinet 14 February 2013 REPORT AUTHOR Contact: David Sheard, Area Support Manager North - 01228 226746 [email protected]

Page 188

Appendix 1

Virement Policy (see key below)**

Local Committee Allocations 2013/14

AREA USE TOTAL

£’000

A Neighbourhood Teams

Allocation for staffing, managed by the Assistant Director – Policy and Performance. Cannot be vired out, but can be supplemented by other allocations.

614

B Local Member Schemes

Fully flexible. Local members to bring proposals for spending to Local Committee for decision – 2012/13 allocation was for two years and uncommitted balances are to be carried forward to 2013/14

0

B General Provision Fully flexible 552

B 0-19 Services Fully flexible. (Guidance provided for 0-19 services if required)

560

B Schools crossing patrols

Fully flexible. (Guidance provided for crossing patrols and road safety if required)

187

C Money Advice / Debt Management Advice

To be used on those areas / contracts only.

317

REVENUE ALLOCATIONS 2,230

**Virement Policy

A No virements out of allocation but can be vired into

B Virements can be made in or out of allocation

C No virements in or out of allocation

Page 189

Appendix 2

Page 190

Appendix 3

SCHOOL CROSSING PATROLS – SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT FOR 2013/14 WITH CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE The 2013/14 agreement will continue to embrace the following service aspects:

• Training – all school crossing patrols will continue to receive refresher road safety training, including an update on current road traffic legislation as it relates to their role.

• Customer Care – all school crossing patrols will continue to receive guidance on the importance and benefits of customer care with particular reference to the needs of children and accompanying adults.

• Uniforms and equipment – the requirements of all school crossing patrols are continually assessed to ensure that they comply fully with current legislation. Statutory items of uniform (hat and coat) and equipment will be issued accordingly.

• Management activities – Resources Facilities Management Unit will pay all salaries and standard employment costs for each individual crossing patrol and recruit any replacements as directed. We will continue to liaise with associated schools to ensure effective absence cover where possible and information to parents. We will also work closely with schools to make the crossing patrol service sufficiently flexible to accommodate any changes to departure or arrival times for breakfast clubs, after school clubs and special events.

However, site reviews, public consultation exercises and traffic surveys will remain the responsibility of the Local Committee and as such, Resources Facilities Management Unit will not be involved. Similarly, Resources Facilities Management Unit will not be responsible for enforcement of any local parking restrictions or alterations that may be required to the highway, including road markings, hazard warning lights or flashing beacons. Cumbria County Council has established a new, wholly owned Local Authority company; Orian Solutions Limited, which will deliver facilities management services – including foodservice, building cleaning, fire extinguisher servicing and school crossing patrols – from 1 April 2013. The school crossers and their area management teams will be transferring to the new company on 31 March 2013 and will to deliver this service to you. Invoices for services provided will come from Orian Solutions Ltd and include VAT (which is reclaimable) at the appropriate rate. Legal information The school crossing patrol service complies with the legislative requirements of the School Crossing Patrol Act 1953, School Crossing Patrol Order 1954 and the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, which was subsequently amended by the Transport Act 2000 (section 270). The law gives a school crossing patrol appointed by an appropriate authority the power to stop traffic on condition that they are wearing a uniform approved by the Secretary of State and are using the prescribed sign. The law states that even where a crossing patrol is provided, parents remain responsible for ensuring their children’s safety on their journey to and from school. Service contact Graeme Gunn: telephone number 01228221339 / e-mail [email protected]

Page 191

School crossing patrols in Carlisle

School Additional crossing facility

Filled (F) or vacant (V) post

Weekly hours/ mins

1 Belle Vue Primary School (Beaver Road) Pelican F 7.05

2 Bishop Harvey Goodwin School (Harold Street) None F 10.50

3 Brampton Primary School (Moat Street) None V 5.20

4 Newtown School (Newtown Road) None V 9.10

5 Robert Ferguson School (Denton Street) None F 5.00

6 St Michael’s School (Carlisle Road, Dalston) None F 9.10

7 Upperby Primary School (Nursery Road) Zebra F 5.50

8 Warwick Bridge School (A59 road) None F 5.50

2 sites 2 vacant 58.15

Resources – February 2013

3 Brampton Primary School (Moat Street) – vacant from 03.09.2010 4 Newtown School (Newtown Road) – vacant from 20.12.2010

All 8 sites for 37.6 academic weeks during 2013/14 @ £13.50 per hour = £29,568 per annum + VAT Within this service level agreement, the Local Committee will continue to be invoiced for delivered kerbside hours only. Crossing Patrol sites vacant for 3 years or more and to be disestablished from 1 April 2013 Inglewood Infant & Junior School (Arnside Road) – vacant from 02.10.2008 Newlaithes Infant & Junior School (Wigton Road) – vacant from 21.09.2009

Page 192

Appendix 4

Guidance on the 0-19 Services Budget from 2011/12 & 2012/13 The Constitution provides that a Local Committee has the following powers in relation to this issue : To allocate, in accordance with the guidance agreed by Cabinet on 3 March 2011, funds from the 0-19 services budget in order to support positive activities, both targeted and mainstream, designed to improve outcomes for children and young people and reduce inequalities and, in doing so, ensure that projects should address at least one of the following criteria:

• Providing access to play, recreational, leisure or outdoor activities.

• Providing access to care or educational activities.

• Providing access to safe and enjoyable places for children and young people to go.

• Providing access to holiday, weekend or out of school activities.

• Enabling children and young people’s involvement and participation e.g. forum, youth council, engagement, empowerment, decision-making.

• Supporting children and young people to take part in volunteering or community action

Page 193

Appendix 5

Electoral Division Ward or Parish/Area

General

Community

Grant

Allocation 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19

ED 0-19

Populations

0-19

Allocation

Total

Community

Grant

Allocation

Belah Belah 5,846 268 284 382 365

3,952.71£ 1,299 3,301.14£ 7,253.85£

Belle Vue Belle Vue 5,617 373 313 367 397

3,797.87£ 1,450 3,684.88£ 7,482.75£

Botcherby Botcherby 5,976 494 322 355 347

4,040.61£ 1,518 3,857.69£ 7,898.29£

Castle Castle 5,663 312 186 222 374

3,828.98£ 1,094 2,780.18£ 6,609.15£

Currock Currock 6,020 433 347 393 442

4,070.36£ 1,615 4,104.19£ 8,174.55£

Denton Holme Denton Holme 5,968 330 290 313 369

4,035.20£ 1,302 3,308.77£ 7,343.97£

Harraby Harraby 5,974 362 313 344 359

4,039.25£ 1,378 3,501.91£ 7,541.16£

Morton Morton 5,757 251 272 296 331

3,892.53£ 1,150 2,922.49£ 6,815.02£

St Aidans St Aidans 5,672 249 192 241 342

3,835.06£ 1,024 2,602.29£ 6,437.35£

Stanwix Stanwix 5,774 304 277 291 372

3,904.03£ 1,244 3,161.37£ 7,065.40£

Upperby Upperby 5,396 346 345 363 389

3,648.45£ 1,443 3,667.09£ 7,315.54£

Yewdale Yewdale 5,919 273 273 335 401

4,002.07£ 1,282 3,257.94£ 7,260.01£

Brampton and Gilsland Brampton 4,479 206 230 265 282

Irthing 2,008 94 115 141 110

6,487 4,386.11£ 1,443 3,667.09£ 8,053.20£

Dalston and Cummersdale Dalston 6,192 305 318 362 443

Burgh 2,030 70 107 128 157

Less Beumont Parish -447 -20 -55

7,775 5,256.98£ 1,815 4,612.45£ 9,869.43£

Longtown and Bewcastle Longtown and Rockcliffe 4,156 217 172 210 293

Lyne 2,072 97 104 125 116

Less Stapleton Parish -221 -10 -39

Beumont Parish 447 20 55

6,454 4,363.80£ 1,360 3,456.16£ 7,819.96£

Stanwix and Irthington Stanwix Rural 4,417 223 243 248 245

Stapleton Parish 221 10 39

Hayton 2,015 102 103 108 133

Less Heads Nook, Faugh

6,653 4,498.35£ 1,454 3,695.04£ 8,193.40£

Wetheral Wetheral 4,505 174 202 293 259

Great Corby and Geltsdale 2,073 95 82 128 155

Heads Nook, Faugh

6,578 4,447.64£ 1,388 3,527.32£ 7,974.96£

Grand Total 103,529 70,000.00£ 23,259 59,108.00£ 129,108.00£

Population

Young People Populations

Page 194

Page 195

Page 196

This page is intentionally left blank

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Chief Executive

LOCAL MEMBER SCHEMES

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report presents a number of projects to be funded from the Local Member Schemes budgets. The report includes Members’ proposals that have been sufficiently investigated and developed, to enable Local Committee to consider spending decisions.

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 Proposals coming forward under the Local Members Scheme should be projects which offer benefits to communities and help resolve local issues already identified through local community engagement and which are in line with the priorities within the Council Plan and specific local priorities within the Area Plan for the Local Committee Area.

2.2 If these proposals are developed as a result of effective community engagement they will also contribute to increasing community perceptions of their ability to influence the delivery of public services.

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 Members approve the following:

3.2 A revenue grant of £5400 from the Belle Vue Division LMS budget to Living Well Trust towards the development and delivery of targeted training courses around parenting skills, a job club and a mentoring programme for victims of domestic abuse.

3.3 A revenue grant of £2000 from the Belle Vue Division LMS budget to Newtown Community Primary School towards the completion of the new school library project.

Agenda Item 12

Page 197

3.4 A revenue grant of £1000 from the Castle Division LMS budget to Carlisle Music City towards the delivery costs of the 2013 City Centre programme.

3.5 A revenue grant of £1000 from the Castle Division LMS budget to Newtown Community Primary School towards the completion of the new school library project.

3.6 A revenue grant of £1000 from the Castle Division LMS budget to Carlisle Festival Ltd towards the costs of Britten’s Noyes Fludde as the festival centrepiece in Carlisle Cathedral by 50 schoolchildren from the Carlisle District.

3.7 A revenue grant of £1500 from the Upperby LMS budget to Barnardo’s South towards the costs of a young persons residential for consultation on services.

3.8 A revenue grant of £1400 from the Longtown & Bewcastle LMS budget to Bewcastle Community Pool towards the costs of repair and servicing to the pool.

3.9 A revenue grant of £2000 from the Longtown & Bewcastle LMS budget to Rockcliffe Parish hall towards the costs or replacing the boiler.

3.10 A revenue grant of £5000 from the Longtown & Bewcastle LMS budget to Arthuret Parish Council towards the costs of developing a BMX track.

3.11 A revenue grant of £1600 from the Stanwix & Irthington LMS budget to Carlisle City Council’s Green Spaces team towards the costs of upgrading footpaths in Rickerby Park.

3.12 A revenue grant of £1500 from the Stanwix & Irthington LMS budget to 2nd Carlisle Houghton & Kingmoor Scouts to purchase a mess tent and equipment.

3.13 A revenue grant of £1650 from the Stanwix & Irthington LMS budget to Stanwix Rural Parish Council towards the costs of developing a new play area in Crosby on Eden.

3.14 A revenue grant of £700 from the Stanwix & Irthington LMS budget to Hethersgill Parish Council towards the costs of resurfacing the car park at the Village Hall.

3.15 A revenue grant of £2191 from the Stanwix & Irthington LMS budget to Irthington Parish Council towards the costs of developing a new play area in Newtown village.

3.16 A revenue grant of £985 from the Dalston & Cummersdale LMS budget to Cumbria County Council towards the costs of installing a temporary speed activated device.

Page 198

3.17 A revenue grant of £2000 from the Currock LMS budget to Riverside Housing towards the costs of installing fencing along Toronto Street.

3.18 A revenue grant of £2000 from the Currock LMS budget to Currock Community Centre towards the costs of an energy saving programme to improve the energy efficiency of the centre.

3.19 A revenue grant of £300 from the Longtown and Bewcastle LMS budget to Rockcliffe School towards improving the drainage of the grounds and field.

3.20 A revenue grant of £1000 from the Longtown and Bewcastle LMS budget to Bewcastle Parish Council for a woodwork project to provide picnic tables.

3.21 A revenue grant of £2500 from the Upperby LMS budget to provide self righting bollards on the corner of St Ninians Road and Upperby Road.

3.22 A revenue grant of £3872 from the Belle Vue LMS budget to the 3rd Carlisle Scout Group towards the purchase of canoes and equipment.

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 The general options available to members are to:

• propose a single £12,000 project; or several smaller elements of eligible activity which could be amalgamated within a wider eligible and agreed programme of works, costing >£12,000

• support projects inside and outside of their electoral division

• combine their allocations with other County Councillors to support larger scale projects.

4.2 Appendix 1 contains the detail on a proposal, for consideration. The

proposal ends with a summary assessment given by the Area Engagement Officer, having regard to any technical or other advice from colleagues in relevant Directorates.

4.3 As part of the 2011-12 County Council budget settlement for Local

Committees, there was a new revenue scheme, financed for one year only, but available across two financial years. It makes available, through Local Committee decisions, £12,000 in respect of each electoral division across Carlisle. Being revenue, it is not constrained by the capital expenditure rules. In addition as part of the 2012-13 County Council budget settlement for Local Committees, there was additional revenue finance provided for one year only but available across two financial years. This provided a further £10,000 in respect

Page 199

of each electoral division across Carlisle but can be spent up to the 2013-14 financial year.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 Members can approve, vary or reject any or all of the recommendations, within the delegated frameworks of the Local Member Scheme.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 The Local Revenue Members schemes budget has an unallocated balance of £67,383 after the decisions of the Local Committee meeting on the 5th February 2013.

6.2 The recommendations in this report (amended) total £40,598, which if approved would leave an unallocated balance of £26,785.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 Part 5 paragraph 25 of the constitution permits approval of local member schemes.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 The use of these Electoral Division Local Member Scheme budgets, when linked to the Council’s well-being powers does enable a flexible response to perceived local needs, and is capable of resolving some long standing blockages and frustrations for local people, having regard to wider community benefit as a key outcome.

Jill Stannard Chief Executive

28 February 2013

APPENDICES 1. Scheme proposals for approval Electoral Divisions: Belle Vue, Castle, Currock, Dalston & Cummersdale,

Longtown & Bewcastle, Stanwix & Irthington, Upperby

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant N/A

Page 200

Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

N/A

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? N/A

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS Council Budget Report 17 February 2011 Cabinet approved the allocation for a Local Member Schemes Budget on 3 March 2011. CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny BACKGROUND PAPERS No background papers

REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Paul Carrigan, Area Support Team North - 01228 221054 [email protected]

Page 201

Page 202

Appendix 1

CCC Electoral Division Belle Vue

Supporting Officer Paul Carrigan

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £7019.76

CCC LMS Contribution £5400

Living Well Trust – Community Skills Development The Living Well Trust community organisation has identified a series of courses to be delivered that will meet local need. The courses themselves will be delivered from the Community House on Raffles Avenue and will target the following areas: 1. Parenting Support – a skills development programme 2. Domestic Abuse – a course to allow victims to positively recognise choices available 3. Job Club – advice and information relating to the securing of employment.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 o 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

IT Equipment £1143.76 Room Hire £3900 Staffing Costs £1976

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

The balance of funding will be provided by the Living Well Trust.

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

This project fits with the county council’s “aspirations for Cumbria” as identified in the Council Plan 2011 – 2014. The project has been developed by a local Community Group in association with other partners as a community project to improve the facilities in the area and provide facilities for local people and community groups.

Officer Evaluation

The project is well supported locally as it has been developed by local residents and volunteers. This is evidenced by the significant amount of funding raised locally through a variety of fundraising events held by the community.

Page 203

CCC Electoral Division Belle Vue

Supporting Officer Paul Carrigan

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £5000

CCC LMS Contribution £2000

Newtown Community School -- Library In 2011 the school identified an area that could be developed into a school library; works were undertaken to prepare the physical alterations that were required and a grant secured from Riverside Housing association to complete works and re stock the library. In order to fully complete the project additional funding is required to purchase additional seating, IT equipment & if funds allow additional resource materials.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 o 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

An estimate and invoices provided for works to date.

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Riverside Housing Association £2000 Newtown Community School fund £1000

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

The project fits with locally identified priorities to improve community facilities and the County Council aim of making Cumbria ‘’ a great place to be a child and grow up’’

Officer Evaluation

This project demonstrates a local member working with their local community to develop and improve facilities & provision in the locality.

Page 204

CCC Electoral Division Castle

Supporting Officer Paul Carrigan

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £25000

CCC LMS Contribution £1000

Carlisle Music City This application is towards the costs of 9 days of musical events in public spaces and venues across the city. The events are aimed at promoting local performers and artists, while developing a local music industry. It also aims to enhance tourism, link with city traders and boost the local economy. Many of the events will take place within the Castle Electoral Division and it could be said the Castle Division is the home of Carlisle Music City. The money would be used to pay for equipment needed for the events and help towards promoting costs.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 o 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Equipment hire = £5000 Printing costs = £1500 Room/Venue hire = £2500 Total costs for this application = £9000

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Carlisle City Council is allocating £5000 to the 2013 event; a funding application has been made to the Arts Council and also Riverside Housing Association.

Estimated date of completion May 2013

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

The Council Plan 2011 – 2014 has the aspiration that Cumbria County Council will work with local communities to ensure Cumbria will be a “place to live in a high quality and sustainable environment” and ensure that “Cumbria has a thriving economy”

Officer Evaluation

This project provides a District wide access to Arts and Entertainment for residents of Carlisle; it will enhance the local economy and highlight Carlisle as a location developing its arts & entertainment provision.

Page 205

CCC Electoral Division Castle

Supporting Officer Paul Carrigan

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £5000

CCC LMS Contribution £1000

Newtown Community School -- Library In 2011 the school identified an area that could be developed into a school library; works were undertaken to prepare the physical alterations that were required and a grant secured from Riverside Housing association to complete works and re stock the library. In order to fully complete the project additional funding is required to purchase additional seating, IT equipment & if funds allow additional resource materials.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 o 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

An estimate and invoices provided for works to date.

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Riverside Housing Association £2000 Belle Vue Ward member LMS scheme

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

The project fits with locally identified priorities to improve community facilities and the County Council aim of making Cumbria ‘’ a great place to be a child and grow up’’

Officer Evaluation

This project demonstrates a local member working with their local community to develop and improve facilities & provision in the locality.

Page 206

CCC Electoral Division Castle

Supporting Officer Paul Carrigan

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £6000

CCC LMS Contribution £1000

Carlisle Festival The Carlisle Festival takes place in July and this year the Festival organisers are seeking to celebrate Benjamin Britten’s centenary with a production of Noye’s Fludde as the centrepiece of this years Festival. This will involve 50 or more local children from Carlisle in performance with professional singers and instrumentalists. As the performance involves professional input at all levels this is reflected in the anticipated costs involved.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 o 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +ü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Professional players £2000 Conductor £1000 Producer £1000 Pianist £250 + associated costs inc room hire, rehearsal costs lighting etc.

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

The balance of funding is from Sponsorships, ticket sales, other grant applications.

Estimated date of completion July 2013

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

We want Cumbria to be a great place to be a child and grow up in; a place of opportunity where young people are able to live happy and productive lives; a place where young people will want to live and work in the future.

Officer Evaluation

This project supports the Council aim above whilst giving local schoolchildren an opportunity to perform alongside professional musicians & singers, a chance that does not arise very often.

Page 207

CCC Electoral Division Upperby

Supporting Officer Niall Mcnulty

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £1,939

CCC LMS Contribution £1,500

Sure Start South Children and Young People consultation residential Sure Start South are going to take some children and young people on a residential to consult and engage with them on the services they access and the activities they would like to see develop in the local area. This information will be shared and used to inform future delivery in the local area and identify current gaps in provision.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 üüüü 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +¤

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Transport = £150 Residential and activities = £1539 Misc costs = £250 Total Cost = £1,939

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Young people will be asked to fundraise towards the residential as part of pre-residential activities and any shortfall will be made up from Barnardo’s budgets

Estimated date of completion Summer 2013

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

The Project fits with the county councils “aspirations for Cumbria” as identified in the Council plan 2011 – 2014 under the following themes:

Officer Evaluation

This project will provide useful information to develop services and positive activities for young people in the local area which will be shared with services and organisation in the local area. This can help inform future delivery, identify potential gaps in provision and help prioritise future funding.

Page 208

CCC Electoral Division Longtown & Bewcastle

Supporting Officer Niall Mcnulty

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £2,690

CCC LMS Contribution £1,400

Bewcastle Community Pool- towards heating and maintenance The pool is used by the community and the school for a range of activities. The annual costs of the pool have been increasing which includes the fees for cleaning, general maintenance, insurance and health and safety costs of lifeguards. During the day the school use the pool as part of classes and then it is used by community groups and residents.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 ¤ 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Heating = £1400 Electricity = £210 Cleaning = £142 Insurance = £938 Total Cost = £2690

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

The community will contribute and fundraise towards the project and the school have secured funds towards the insurance

Estimated date of completion Summer 2013

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

The Project fits with the county councils “aspirations for Cumbria” as identified in the Council plan 2011 – 2014 under the following themes: “We will ensure that Cumbria is a great place to be a child and to grow up; We want the best for every childQand have diverse opportunities available to them.”

Officer Evaluation

This funding will support the community to cover immediate costs for the year which will provide them with the time to develop a business plan to make the community pool self sustainable long term.

Page 209

CCC Electoral Division Longtown & Bewcastle

Supporting Officer Niall Mcnulty

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £6,725

CCC LMS Contribution £2,000

Rockcliffe Parish hall - Boiler replacement The boiler at the parish hall has recently been condemned as unfit for purpose. The hall is well used by the local community, for activities and meetings. The boiler is essential for its continued use and development for the future.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 ¤ 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Total Cost = £6725 (2 estimates for replacement have been received)

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

The parish hall will contribute to the remaining costs out of existing funds

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

The Project fits with the county councils “aspirations for Cumbria” as identified in the Council plan 2011 – 2014 under the following themes: “We will ensure that Cumbria has a thriving economy: We are committed to promoting thriving communities by championing local economies. “

Officer Evaluation

This funding will provide much needed funds to replace the boiler. Without this the parish hall runs the risk of losing business which has a detrimental effect on their income and its future survival and development.

Page 210

CCC Electoral Division Longtown & Bewcastle

Supporting Officer Niall Mcnulty

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £6,725

CCC LMS Contribution £5,000

Arthuret Parish Council – BMX track The Parish Council wants to develop a BMX track for local young people in the area to use. Young people have been working with the Council to look at activities that they would like to do and BMX came out as something that they would engage in. The development of a track on a former tennis court site will create a safe space for young people to access and take part in BMX activities

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 ¤ 50 - 100 üüüü 100 + ¤

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

The parish hall will contribute to the remaining costs out of existing funds

Estimated date of completion Summer 2013

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

The Project fits with the county councils “aspirations for Cumbria” as identified in the Council plan 2011 – 2014 under the following themes: “We will ensure that Cumbria is a great place to be a child and to grow up: we want the best for every child and young person in CumbriaQand have diverse opportunities available to them”

Officer Evaluation

This funding will support the Parish Council to meet the needs presented to them by a group of young people from the area. The young people have worked with the Parish Council on the idea of a BMX track and have a sense of ownership over the project. The development of the track will also provide a space for young people to go as an alternative to recently building their own BMX track which was dangerous and created the potential for ASB in an area

Page 211

CCC Electoral Division Stanwix & Irthington

Supporting Officer Paul Carrigan

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost ongoing £1600+

CCC LMS Contribution £1600

Rickerby Park footpaths To improve footpath surfaces within Rickerby Park. Works to be planned and completed by Carlisle City Council Green Spaces team as per Jon May instructions.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 o 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

This funding is a contribution to a continuing project of facilities upgrade within Rickerby Park.

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Carlisle City Council

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

This project fits with the county council’s “aspirations for Cumbria” as identified in the Council Plan 2011 – 2014 under the following theme:

For the environment: We want Cumbria to be a place where you can live in a high quality and sustainable environment and you can move easily and safely around the county.

Officer Evaluation

This project demonstrates a Member responding to the needs of the community they represent.

Page 212

CCC Electoral Division Stanwix & Irthington

Supporting Officer Paul Carrigan

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £1800

CCC LMS Contribution £1500

2nd Carlisle Houghton & Kingmoor Scout Group - Mess Tent The group have identified the need to purchase a fit for purpose Mess Tent to be used on Camping Trips. Although a number of smaller tents are currently used for this purpose the group currently borrow larger tents for trips and this is becoming increasingly difficult due to the increasing numbers of young people now engaging in Scouting. Some equipment to kit out the tent will also be purchased in particular trestle tables and seating.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 o 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +ü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

£1200 + VAT + delivery charges for the tent £300 for internal equipment

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

The Scouts will provide the balance of funding from current balances.

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

This project fits within the County Councils aspirations for Cumbria as identified in the Council Plan 2011 – 2014 under the following: We want Cumbria to be a great place to be a child and grow up in; a place of opportunity where young people are able to live happy and productive lives.

Officer Evaluation

This project supports the aims of the County Council whilst also achieving target under the Active Cumbria strategy and the Carlisle Healthy City strategy.

Page 213

CCC Electoral Division Stanwix & Irthington

Supporting Officer Paul Carrigan

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £54000

CCC LMS Contribution £1000

Crosby on Eden Play Area Stanwix Rural Parish Council is developing a project to provide a play area in Crosby on Eden village. This project has funding drawn down from varying partners including the Parish Council itself, Cumbria Waste Management, the Parish Council Association & the Playing Fields Association. The bulk of the funding is now in place to secure project completion and this contribution will be the 10% third party injection required to release the Cumbria Waste Management Grant.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 o 50 - 100 üüüü 100 +¤

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Complete delivery including equipment has been estimated at £54000

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

£30,000 – Stanwix Rural PC £10,000 – CWM grant Further grants secured from CPCA and Playing Fields.

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

As part of the Council Plan 2011 – 2014 Cumbria County Council seeks to achieve: ‘’We want Cumbria to be a great place to be a child and grow up in; a place of opportunity where young people are able to live happy and productive lives; a place where young people will want to live and work in the future’’

Officer Evaluation

This application demonstrates a project supported by a range of funding where a Local Member is utilising a small portion of their LMS funding to access additional funding for the group. The project itself contributes to the Council Plan and will improve facilities in a local community.

Page 214

CCC Electoral Division Stanwix & Irthington

Supporting Officer Paul Carrigan

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £9,000 +VAT

CCC LMS Contribution £700

Hethersgill Parish Council – Village Hall Car Park Funding is requested to resurface the car park at Hethersgill Village Hall. The application is to restore part of the car park to a safe and usable state and safeguard the future use of this community facility for all residents and visitors. The village hall is the only community facility in the village and the parish council wish to ensure the safety of users by upgrading the car park facilities with a new surface. The parish council are making this application for funding on behalf of the village hall committee in their capacity as custodian trustees of the village hall.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 o 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +þ

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Estimates provided although funding is only available to part complete the works at present.

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Funding from the CPCA and Parish Council funds will match fund this project.

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Strategy, Community Plans, etc)

This project fits with the county council’s “aspirations for Cumbria” as identified in the Council Plan 2011 – 2014. The project fits with locally identified priorities to improve and invest in this important community asset for the benefit of all in the parish.

Officer Evaluation

This project will enable the safe use of the village hall car park and will be beneficial to the community as a number of local community groups and organisations regularly use this facility.

Page 215

CCC Electoral Division Stanwix & Irthington

Supporting Officer Paul Carrigan

Date Approved by Local Committee

20March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £35,000

CCC LMS Contribution £1374.79

Newtown Play Area Irthington Parish Council is developing a project to provide a play area in Newtown Village. This will provide a new play area for the village and its surrounding community which will enhance local provision. The local community are committed to the delivery of this project and by doing so will provide access for play and outdoor recreation for all residents in and around the village.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 o 50 - 100 üüüü 100 +¤

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Complete delivery including equipment has been estimated at £

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

As part of the Council Plan 2011 – 2014 Cumbria County Council seeks to achieve: ‘’We want Cumbria to be a great place to be a child and grow up in; a place of opportunity where young people are able to live happy and productive lives; a place where young people will want to live and work in the future’’

Officer Evaluation

The project is a good example of the local parish council working in partnership with Local Authority Members to improve facilities within the parish.

Page 216

CCC Electoral Division Dalston and Cummersdale

Supporting Officer Niall Mcnulty

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £1,300

CCC LMS Contribution £985

Orton/Thurstonfield – Vehicular activated sign The sharing of a vehicular activated sign along this road is being developed as a possible measure to reduce the speed of traffic. The signs

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 ¤ 50 - 100 ¤ 100 + üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Sign costs = £800 Maintenance = £500 Total costs = £1,300

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Funding has been secured from other budgets

Estimated date of completion Summer 2013

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

The Project fits with the county councils “aspirations for Cumbria” as identified in the Council plan 2011 – 2014 under the following themes: “We will ensure that Cumbria has a thriving economy: We are committed to promoting thriving communities by championing local economies”

Officer Evaluation

This funding will increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the community centre and long term self sustainability of the project

Page 217

CCC Electoral Division Currock

Supporting Officer Niall Mcnulty

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £2,500

CCC LMS Contribution £2,000

Riverside – Toronto Street Fencing Funding will be used towards the costs of fencing in the Toronto street area. This will provide added security for the residents and a distinct boundary around properties. The fencing will also be part of natural landscaping so that it blends in with the natural look and feel of the area

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 ¤ 50 - 100 ¤ 100 + üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Riverside will contribute towards the costs

Estimated date of completion Summer 2013

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

The Project fits with the county councils “aspirations for Cumbria” as identified in the Council plan 2011 – 2014 under the following themes: “We will ensure that Cumbria has a thriving economy: We are committed to promoting thriving communities by championing local economies ”We will ensure that Cumbria is a place to enjoy an independent and healthy life

Officer Evaluation

This funding will increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the community centre and long term self sustainability of the project

Page 218

CCC Electoral Division Currock

Supporting Officer Niall Mcnulty

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £15,000

CCC LMS Contribution £2,000

Currock Community Centre – Energy Saving programme The community centre is looking to develop more energy efficient savings from better insulation, lighting and developing the entrance area.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 ¤ 50 - 100 ¤ 100 + üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Community centre contribution

Estimated date of completion Summer 2013

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

The Project fits with the county councils “aspirations for Cumbria” as identified in the Council plan 2011 – 2014 under the following themes: “We will ensure that Cumbria has a thriving economy: We are committed to promoting thriving communities by championing local economies”

Officer Evaluation

This funding will increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the community centre and long term self sustainability of the project

Page 219

CCC Electoral Division Longtown and Bewcastle

Supporting Officer Niall Mcnulty

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description

Total Project Cost £300 (to be determined)

CCC LMS Contribution £300

Rockcliffe School Drainage project Funding is being requested towards the costs of improving the drainage on the grounds and playing fields of Rockcliffe school. During inclement weather the grounds hold water and become unusable by the school and the local community children. The drainage project aims to provide an escape route for the excess water and thereby allowing the playing field to be used more regularly by the local community and school children

Number of people benefiting 1 - 10 10 - 50 üüüü 50+ A

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Initial costings have been provided by contractors for 2 ditches to increase the drainage. A full development proposal is still to be completed detailing the drainage ditches on site.

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Additional funding will be provided by the school

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area

Plan, Community Strategy, Community Plans, etc)

Two of the 3 key themes in Cumbria County Councils Council Plan are:-

1.0 Ensuring that the most vulnerable people in our communities receive the support they need

In addition The Council Plan seeks to Achieve – wanting Cumbria to be a great place to be a child and

grow up in; a place of opportunity where young people are able to live happy and productive lives; a place where young people will want to live and work in the future. The construction of this improved community facility supports all of the above.

Officer Evaluation

The drainage problem at the school has meant that the fields where only useable for a few days over the last year. This applies to the local community children and young people as well as the school children. Having appropriate drainage along this site will make it fit for purpose and useable more in the future which benefits the whole community

Page 220

CCC Electoral Division Longtown and Bewcastle

Supporting Officer Niall Mcnulty

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description

Total Project Cost £1,000 (still to be

determined)

CCC LMS Contribution £1,000

Bewcastle Parish Council –––– Woodwork project Funding is being requested towards the costs of developing a woodwork project to deliver picnic tables for the local area. The project would train local people on basic DIY and woodwork skills with a view to building picnic tables and benches for the park.

Number of people benefiting 1 - 10 10 - 50 50+ üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Funding contributions have been secured from the Parish Council

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

.

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area

Plan, Community Strategy, Community Plans, etc)

Two of the 3 key themes in Cumbria County Councils Council Plan are:-

3.0 Ensuring that the most vulnerable people in our communities receive the support they need 4.0 Improving the life chances of the most disadvantaged in Cumbria

In addition The Council Plan seeks to Achieve – wanting Cumbria to be a great place to be a child and

grow up in; a place of opportunity where young people are able to live happy and productive lives; a place where young people will want to live and work in the future. The construction of this improved community facility supports all of the above.

Officer Evaluation

The woodwork project will be aimed at engaging local community adults and young people who would like to try something different and develop new skills. Along with this the project will deliver 3-4 picnic tables and benches which will be installed and used in the local park. The additional skills can be used by members/young people in their own homes.

Page 221

CCC Electoral Division Upperby

Supporting Officer Niall Mcnulty

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description

Total Project Cost £2,500

CCC LMS Contribution £2,500

Installation of self-righting bollards on the junction of St Ninians Road and Upperby Road Funding is being requested towards the costs of installing self righting bollards on the corner of a junction at St Ninians road and Upperby road. Residents and local County and District Councillors have identified this area as being a potential danger for pedestrians as turning vehicles mount the pavement which is at road height. The increasing traffic on the road and the use of the pavement by the local community to access schools and parks requires a need to prevent any potential accidents.

Number of people benefiting 1 - 10 10 - 50 50+ üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

The County Council highways team have provided initial costings of £2,500 for the scheme

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

Any additional funding may be allocated from the Minor Local Safety Schemes budget.

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area

Plan, Community Strategy, Community Plans, etc)

Two of the 3 key themes in Cumbria County Councils Council Plan are:-

1.0 Ensuring that the most vulnerable people in our communities receive the support they need 2.0 Improving the life chances of the most disadvantaged in Cumbria

Officer Evaluation

The installation of these bollards provides a clear boundary between pedestrians and road users reducing the risks of any potential accidents.

Page 222

CCC Electoral Division Belle Vue

Supporting Officer Paul Carrigan

Date Approved by Local Committee

20 March 2013

Project Description Total Project Cost £3872

CCC LMS Contribution £3872

3rd Carlisle St Barnabas Scout Group To purchase 6 canoes and all associated equipment to allow the group to offer water based training for the Scout Group and others across the District.

Number of people benefiting

1 - 10 o 10 - 50 o 50 - 100 ¤ 100 +üüüü

Breakdown of costs (supported by estimates)

Total Costs of purchasing six canoes and associated equipment ( paddles, life vests etc.) is £3872, estimate provided.

Statement of ‘Match Funding’ (where necessary)

N/A

Estimated date of completion ASAP

Strategic Fit & Evidence of Community Support (link to Council Plan, Local Area Plan,

Community Plans, etc)

This project fits with the county council’s “aspirations for Cumbria” as identified in the Council Plan 2011 – 2014. The project meets the aim ‘’ we want Cumbria to be a great place to be a child and grow up in; a place of opportunity where young people are able to live happy and productive lives; a place where young people will want to live and work in the future. ‘’

Officer Evaluation

The project will provide additionally to the offer made by the 3rd Carlisle Scouts and also across the District

Page 223

Page 224

This page is intentionally left blank

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Chief Executive

AREA GRANTS FUND

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report outlines the request for grant funding from the following organisations:

1.2 Carlisle Music City

1.3 Cumbria Cerebral Palsy

1.4 North Cumbria Recitals

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 The County Council’s key priorities are:

Challenging poverty in all its forms;

Ensuring that the most vulnerable people in our communities receive the support they need; and,

Improving the chances in life of the most disadvantaged in Cumbria

2.2 The support for the grant referred to in this report directly contributes to all of the above the main priorities and in addition, this work of the Local Committee will contribute directly to the aspirations for Cumbria:

To enjoy an independent and healthy life: We want Cumbria to be a place where everyone is able to enjoy an active, healthy and fulfilling life.

A place to live in a high quality and sustainable environment: We want everyone to enjoy living in our truly world class environment.

Agenda Item 13

Page 225

A place to live with a thriving economy: We want to ensure that Cumbria’s economic position is strengthened

2.3 Carlisle Local Committee has the executive function to determine applications for grant funding, loans and contributions to external bodies, voluntary organisations or individuals within a policy framework. The relevant policy framework is the Council Plan.

2.4 Carlisle Local Committee has previously agreed a fund of £10,000 for organisations to apply to where grants cover an area of the Carlisle District.

2.5 A separate Equality Impact Assessment is not required as equality issues are dealt with at a grant level and through monitoring of the Directorate EIA. Applicants are required to submit equal opportunities statements, child protection and vulnerable adults’ policies along with supporting data about inclusion of the community and responding to the community based on Ward Profiles, Community Plans, Parish Plans, etc. Grant funding is monitored on the District protected characteristics under the EIA for the Directorate.

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 Members are asked to consider the attached grant applications/requests that predominantly cover the Carlisle area and determine the level of funding to be given to each from the General Provision budget.

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 Carlisle Music City are looking for a contribution of £5,000 towards the overall cost of £25,000 towards a city wide music event

4.2 Cumbria Cerebral Palsy are looking for a contribution of £759 towards the overall cost of £1,759 for a specialist hoist for users of there day centre

4.3 North Cumbria Recitals are looking for a contribution of £650 towards the overall cost of £6,500 towards a series of music events

4.4 Appendix 1 contains more detail on individual grant applications for consideration. Each proposal provides:

• grant requested,

• overall project cost,

• a brief project description,

• a summary assessment and recommendation given by the Area Engagement Officer.

Page 226

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 For members to approve applications, reject the applications or to allocate funding as appropriate. Members have also the option of recommending that Neighbourhood Forums consider funding these projects as listed from their own General Provision Budget.

5.2 As the grants submitted exceed the current budget available Members also have the option to increase the Area Grants funding from the General Provision budget.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 There is £4,737 available resources in the General Provision budget for 2012/13 and elsewhere on the agenda the 2013/14 budget is to be confirmed. The applications presented total £6,409.

6.2 Either the agreed sums for the 3 applications can be kept within the £4,737 budget for 2012/13 or up to £1,672 can be committed from the 2013/14 Area Wide budget (£10,000) to enable all the applications to be fully supported. This would leave a remaining balance for 2013/14 Area Wide grants of £8328.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 Part 5 paragraph 17 of the Constitution authorises local committees to determine grants loans and contributions to outside bodies voluntary organisations individuals and third sector organisations. (HM)

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 This report sets out details of grant applications received for consideration by Carlisle Local Committee from the Area Grants budget.

Jill Stannard Chief Executive February 2013 APPENDICES Appendix 1 – applications for approval Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle

Page 227

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

N/A

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? N/A

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS No previous relevant decisions CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny BACKGROUND PAPERS Copies of applications for Grant Funding are available from the Area Support Team Carlisle. REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Niall Mcnulty (Area Engagement Officer) Tel: 01228 226570 Email: [email protected]

Page 228

Appendix 1

Application Summary: Area Grants Budget

Division(s) / Area(s) Carlisle Wide Ref No.

Group Name Carlisle Music City

Supporting Officers Niall Mcnulty, Area Engagement Officer

Date of Local Committee 20 March 2013

Project Start Date/Duration May - June

Amount Requested £5,000 Total Project Cost

£25,000

APPLICATION REPORT

Application Summary This application is towards the costs of 9 days of musical events in public spaces and venues across the city. The events are aimed at promoting local performers and artists, while developing a local music industry. It also aims to enhance tourism, link with city traders and boost the local economy. The money would be used to pay for equipment needed for the events and help towards promoting costs.

Strategic Fit The Council Plan 2011 – 2014 has the aspiration that Cumbria County Council will work with local communities to ensure Cumbria will be a “place to live in a high quality and sustainable environment” and ensure that “Cumbria has a thriving economy”

Match with Criteria & Local Committee Priorities This application meets funding criteria

Number of people benefiting within the following age ranges:

1 - 10 10 -50 50 +

üüüü

Breakdown of Project Costs (supported by estimates) Equipment hire = £5000 Printing costs = £1500 Room/Venue hire = £2500 Total costs for this application = £9000

Details of Match Funding (where necessary) Funding contributions have been confirmed by Carlisle City Council (£5000) and being sought from Riverside Housing (£2000) with an application going to The Arts Council for continuation funding

Page 229

A copy of the application or further details can be obtained on request from the Carlisle Area Support Team office.

Page 230

Application Summary: Area Grants Budget

Division(s) / Area(s) Carlisle Wide Ref No. 241

Group Name Cumbria Cerebral Palsy

Supporting Officers Paul Carrigan, Area Engagement Officer

Date of Local Committee 20 March 2013

Project Start Date/Duration This application is towards the costs of delivering the 2013 project.

Amount Requested £795 Total Project Cost

£1,795

APPLICATION REPORT

Application Summary Towards specialist hoist for the day centre This application is towards the costs of specialist equipment at a day centre run by Cumbria Cerebral palsy. The centre caters for all people who are labelled as having cerebral palsy, which includes people with multiple disabilities and wheelchair users. The addition of the hoist will support wheelchair users who require assistance with all aspects of their personal care, including manually transferred from there chair to the toilet.

Strategic Fit The Council Plan 2011 – 2014 has the aspiration that Cumbria County Council will work with local communities to ensure people in Cumbria enjoy an independent and healthy life

Match with Criteria & Local Committee Priorities This application meets funding criteria

Number of people benefiting within the following age ranges:

1 - 10 10 -50 50 +

üüüü

Breakdown of Project Costs (supported by estimates) Estimates have been provided for a Minilift 125 Standaid hoist = £1795

Details of Match Funding (where necessary) Albert Hunt Trust £1,000 secured

A copy of the application or further details can be obtained on request from the Carlisle Area Support Team office.

Page 231

Application Summary: Area Grants Budget

Division(s) / Area(s) Carlisle Wide Ref No. 242

Group Name North Cumbria Recitals

Supporting Officers Paul Carrigan, Area Engagement Officer

Date of Local Committee 20 March 2013

Project Start Date/Duration

Amount Requested £500 Total Project Cost

£6500

APPLICATION REPORT

Application Summary

This application is towards the costs of delivering regular classical chamber music events and training in Carlisle. The costs of

Strategic Fit

The Council Plan 2011 – 2014 has the aspiration that Cumbria will be a place to enjoy an independent and healthy life; that it will be ‘a place to live in a high quality and sustainable environment’ and by working with the Third Sector to promote an active and healthy lifestyle.

Match with Criteria & Local Committee Priorities This application meets funding criteria

Number of people benefiting within the following age ranges:

1 - 10 10 -50 50 +

üüüü

Breakdown of Project Costs (supported by estimates) Room hire = £950 Travel = £650 Insurances = £350

Details of Match Funding (where necessary) The balance of the funding will be generated from increasing costs of contributions and charges

A copy of the application or further details can be obtained on request from the Carlisle Area Support Team office.

Page 232

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Chief Executive

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITY

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report provides a case study of recent community engagement activities delivered in the Carlisle Area and a summary of General Community Engagement Activity undertaken by the Area Support Team to date

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 Neighbourhood Forums, Community Events and Community Based Consultation form part of the County Council’s consultation process and support the Council to ensure the underpinning aim of being “Effective and Efficient” is achieved whilst targeting the County Council’s key priorities:

Challenging poverty in all its forms;

Ensuring that the most vulnerable people in our communities receive the support they need; and,

Improving the chances in life of the most disadvantaged in Cumbria

2.2 A separate Equality Impact Assessment is not required as equality issues are dealt with at a grant level and through monitoring of the Directorate EIA. Applicants are required to submit equal opportunities statements, child protection and vulnerable adult’s policies along with supporting data about inclusion of the community and responding to the community based on Ward Profiles, Community Plans, Parish Plans, etc. Grant funding is monitored on the District protected characteristics under the EIA for the Directorate.

Agenda Item 14

Page 233

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 Members are asked to note the report.

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 This report will outline the activity of the Area Support Team in supporting community engagement work across Carlisle and District with a focus on two case studies.

4.2 There have been a number of general community engagement activities as detailed in Appendix 1.

4.3 The two engagement activity case studies include supporting the Denton Holme Survey and the support in developing St Aidans Community First.

4.4 The Denton Holme Survey follows on from work delivered in the past by the Area Support Team and has been developed alongside the County and District ward councillors representing the area. The short survey, accessible on line and hand delivered to houses in Denton Holme, aims to capture the feelings of the community in respect to the services they access and the area that they live in. It follows on from engagement activities delivered by the area support team where the community have been invited to celebrate achievements in Denton Holme and identify opportunities for improvement.

4.5 The findings from these engagement events where used in developing the survey alongside additional questions requested from other agencies and directorates to support consultation work that they are doing.

4.6 Responses will be collated for a report which will be available for residents to view and which can be used to prioritise local needs, and identify any potential gaps or issues for other services to address. The report also aims to identify successes and will provide a snapshot on what has changed since the last survey which was carried out by the Area Support Team in 2006.

4.7 The Community First programme is an £80m government-funded initiative that will run for four years, until March 2015, helping communities to come together. The St Aidans Electoral Division area was chosen to be part of the programme and the Area Support Team has been working alongside the local Member to support the community to set up the local panel and meet the objectives of the Community First scheme.

4.8 The community first objectives include; setting up a community led grants panel; creating a website; create a community plan to identify the key priorities for the St Aidans community. The Area Support Team provided initial administration and facilitation to develop the community led grants panel. The Team also supported the Panel to engage and involve the wider community through drop in events to enable true involvement in the community plan development. The team continue to offer support to the Community First group as it needs it, but have stepped back to allow the group to grow and take greater ownership of the project.

Page 234

These objectives have been achieved with the St Aidans Community First Panel regularly meeting to distribute grants totalling £7,000 over the last year, a further £22,000 over the next 2 years and deliver community events across the St Aidans area (Appendix 3).

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 Members are asked to note the content of the Community Engagement Activity report.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 Carlisle Local Committee helps fund the Area Support Team via the £145,852 Neighbourhood Support Budget. This is a fully committed budget paid over in monthly intervals throughout the financial year.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 As members are only being asked to note the content there are no legal implications to the report as written.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 Members are asked to note the work of the Area Support Team in Appendix 1, specific engagement activity in Appendix 2 and 3

Jill Stannard

Chief Executive

APPENDICES

Appendix 1 – Summary of engagement activity Appendix 2 – Denton Holme Survey Appendix 3 – Briefing notes on St Aidans Community First Electoral Divisions: All Carlisle Electoral Divisions

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

Page 235

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

N/A

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? N/A

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS

No previous relevant decisions

CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY

Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny

BACKGROUND PAPERS

All relevant Forum & Grant information is available from the Area Support Team.

REPORT AUTHOR

Contact: Niall Mcnulty, Area Engagement Officer. Tel: (01228) 226570, email: [email protected]

Page 236

Appendix 1: Community Engagement Activity Undertaken

ACTIVITY Community Event

FORUM AREA Harraby

DATE 16 October 2012

VENUE Harraby Community Centre

BACKGROUND/DETAILS Harraby together We Can (HTWC) hold monthly meetings and the AEO is working with the group community group to engage with the wider community to develop a community led plan for the Harraby area.

ATTENDANCE HTWC committee, Cllr Weber, Cllr Sherriff, Cllr Forrester, Niall Mcnulty (AEO)

ACTIVITY Community Event

FORUM AREA Denton Holme

DATE 7 December 2012

VENUE Denton Holme Community centre

BACKGROUND/DETAILS A Christmas community event was held to celebrate the achievements in the local area and look at possible improvements for the future. This included feedback displays of previous consultations for residents to view.

ATTENDANCE Cllr McDevitt, Niall Mcnulty (AEO), 45-50 residents

ACTIVITY Community Grants Panel

FORUM AREA Wetheral

DATE 18 February 2013

VENUE Wetheral Village Hall

BACKGROUND/DETAILS Community Grants panel meeting with County, City and Parish Councillors to consider grant applications for the Wetheral Division

ATTENDANCE Cllr Nick Marriner, Niall Mcnulty Area Engagement Officer and two Parish Councillors.

ACTIVITY Community Group meeting - St Aidan’s Community First

FORUM AREA St Aidan’s

DATE 21 November, 11 December

VENUE Greystone Community Centre

BACKGROUND/DETAILS Community First panel meeting to deliver a community event, recommend Community first grants and develop the

Page 237

community plan

ATTENDANCE Attendance at Community First meetings: Cllr Reg Watson, Cllr Lucy Patrick, Cllr Anne Quilter 3 Residents, 1 community partner Niall Mcnulty (Area Engagement Officer) Susan Smith (Engagement Support Officer)

ACTIVITY Community Event- St Aidan’s Community First Event

FORUM AREA St Aidan’s

DATE 13 February 2013

VENUE Greystone Community Centre

BACKGROUND/DETAILS Community First official launch event

ATTENDANCE Attendance at Community First meetings: Cllr Reg Watson, Community Police, Carlisle City Environment team, Sustainable Carlisle, Lismore Green residents group, St Aidans Football Club, Sustainable Carlisle, Sure Start South, Inspira and 20 plus residents Niall Mcnulty (Area Engagement Officer)

ACTIVITY Issue based forum on Planning Application

FORUM AREA Currock, Dalston and Cummersdale, and Upperby

DATE 5 December and 6 December 2012

VENUE St Johns Ambulance centre and Carlisle Race Course

BACKGROUND/DETAILS The issue based forums offered the opportunity for local residents to provide comment to planners on an application for a new development in the area

ATTENDANCE Cllr Allison, Cllr Young, Niall Mcnulty (Area Engagement officer), Highways, Planning, Planners and 80-90 people

ACTIVITY Community Grants Panel

FORUM AREA Longtown and Bewcastle

DATE 20 February 2013

VENUE Rockcliffe Village hall

BACKGROUND/DETAILS Community Grants panel meeting with County, City and Parish Councillors to consider grant applications for the Longtown and Bewcastle Division

ATTENDANCE Cllr Val Tarbitt, Niall Mcnulty (Area Engagement Officer) and representatives from local Parish Councils

Page 238

ACTIVITY Community Grants Panel

FORUM AREA Dalston & Cummersdale

DATE 26 February 2012

VENUE Cummersdale Village Hall

BACKGROUND/DETAILS Community Grants panel meeting with County, City and Parish Councillors to consider grant applications for the Dalston & Cummersdale Division.

ATTENDANCE Cllr Trevor Allison, two Parish Councillors and Niall Mcnulty, Area Engagement Officer.

ACTIVITY Community Group Meeting – Lismore Street Residents Group

FORUM AREA St Aidan’s

DATE 30 October 2012

VENUE Residents Property

BACKGROUND/DETAILS To work with a newly formed residents group who are seeking to take ownership of community asset

ATTENDANCE 7 residents Niall McNulty, Area Engagement Officer

ACTIVITY Community Group Meeting

FORUM AREA Upperby

DATE 7 January 2012

VENUE Upperby Parish Hall

BACKGROUND/DETAILS Following on from previous community meetings this group are looking to map the activities that are delivered in Upperby at the moment, promote them and identify any gaps that could be met in the future

ATTENDANCE Upperby CDC; Upperby Parish hall Committee; Niall Mcnulty (Area Engagement Officer)

Page 239

ACTIVITY Community Group Meeting – Waverley Bridge

FORUM AREA Castle

DATE 10 December 2012

VENUE The Lodge

BACKGROUND/DETAILS Following on from previous community engagement a small working group was brought together by Councillor Whalen to examine the future viability of opening up the Waverley Bridge for walkers.

ATTENDANCE County Councillor Whalen, City Councillor Franklin, British Rail Residuary Board, 5 residents

ACTIVITY Community Groups meeting – Belah Muga

FORUM AREA Belah

DATE 17 December 2012

VENUE The Belah Centre

BACKGROUND/DETAILS A site has been identified to the rear of the Belah Centre for the installation of a new MUGA

ATTENDANCE County Councillor Toole, City Councillor Ellis, Paul Carrigan, Luke Leathers, members of the Neighbourhood Policing Team 7 Ground works North East.

ACTIVITY Botcherby Forum

FORUM AREA Botcherby

DATE 13 February 2013

VENUE Botcherby Community Centre

BACKGROUND/DETAILS A meeting of the Botcherby Forum took place

ATTENDANCE County & City Councillor Betton, Paul Carrigan, Phil Gray Carlisle City Council, 23 residents

Page 240

Your future in your hands!Roads and Transport

1. How much, if at all, do you think the following things are a problem in Denton Holme and Longsowerby?

Major problem Minor problem No problem Don’t know

Cars driving too fast on local roads 1 2 3 4

People riding bicycles on the pavement 1 2 3 4

Household rubbish being left in back lanes 1 2 3 4

Cars parked illegally on double yellow lines 1 2 3 4

Footpaths and pavements in poor condition 1 2 3 4

!"#"$%&'%()*'+,%&n Denton Street at peak times 1 2 3 4

!"#$%&#'()*'+,-#(.,#/%0#&*)1#)1,#2%33%&*45#)1*45'#*4#)1*'#(.,(6

Very Fairly Neither/Nor Fairly Very Don’t know/

% -*(./+"0% -*(./+"0% % 1.//*(./+"0% 1.//*(./+"0 Never use

Availability of parking spaces 1 2 3 4 5 6

Condition of the road surface 1 2 3 4 5 6

Availability of on street parking 1 2 3 4 5 6

3. At the meeting, several people said that there were not enough Zebra crossings on the main roads

through Denton Holme and Longsowerby. Do you agree or disagree that this is a problem?

Agree 1 Disagree 2

4. If you answered “agree” to the question above, where do you think that zebra crossings need to be

# 7%'*)*%4,-6##893,(',#:,#'7,;*+;<

5. Several bus routes come through Denton Holme and Longsowerby. Roughly how often do you use the

bus to get to and from this area?

Every day 3 or 4 times a week Around once a week Less than once a week Never use the bus

1 2 3 4 5

="#>1*4?*45#(:%0)#)1,#3%;(3#:0'#',.@*;,#1%&#'()*'+,-#(.,#/%0#&*)1#)1,#2%33%&*45#('7,;)'6

Very Fairly Neither/Nor Fairly Very Don’t know/

% -*(./+"0% -*(./+"0% % 1.//*(./+"0% 1.//*(./+"0 Never use

Frequency of buses 1 2 3 4 5 6

Number of bus stops 1 2 3 4 5 6

Buses running on time 1 2 3 4 5 6

Quality of the buses 1 2 3 4 5 6

Price of bus travel 1 2 3 4 5 6

Page 241

2

Your future in your hands

Health

A"#$%&#'()*'+,-#(.,#/%0#&*)1#)1,#3%;(3#1,(3)1#',.@*;,'#(@(*3(:3,#)%#/%0#*4#B,4)%4#$%3C,#(4-#D%45'%&,.:/6

Very Fairly Neither/Nor Fairly Very Don’t know/

% -*(./+"0% -*(./+"0% % 1.//*(./+"0% 1.//*(./+"0 Never use

GP Services 1 2 3 4 5 6

Dentists 1 2 3 4 5 6

Chemists 1 2 3 4 5 6

Any Others (Please state

8. Do you have any other general comments about health issues in your local community?

9. How much, if at all, do you think that the following are a problem in this area?

Major problem Minor problem No problem Don’t know

Illegal riding/racing of mopeds and motorbikes 1 2 3 4

Young people hanging around on the streets 1 2 3 4

2*30*$./45%6)*'+(.%*30%&(7")%0"$.8")*("%0*4*6"%% 9% :% ;% <

to property or vehicles

People being drunk or rowdy in public places 1 2 3 4

People using or dealing drugs 1 2 3 4

Noisy neighbours or loud parties 1 2 3 4

Other problems:

10. How safe do you feel in this area when you are outside during the day?

Very safe Fairly safe Nethier/nor Fairly unsafe Very unsafe Don’t Know

1 2 3 4 5 6

11. How safe do you feel in this area when you are outside during the evening?

Very safe Fairly safe Nethier/nor Fairly unsafe Very unsafe Don’t Know

1 2 3 4 5 6

E!"#F2#/%0#(4'&,.,-#G2(*.3/#04'(2,H#%.#G@,./#04'(2,H#)%#,*)1,.#I0,')*%4#EJ#%.#I0,')*%4#EK#73,(',#:.*,L/#,M73(*4##

why you feel this way below. Also please make any suggestions about what would make you feel safer.

Page 242

3

Your future in your hands

13. If you have a Back Lane do you feel there is a need for it to be gated? Yes or No? Thinking about the

# 7%3*;,#*4#)1*'#4,*51:%.1%%-#1%&#'()*'+,-#(.,#/%0#&*)1#)1,#2%33%&*456

Very Fairly Neither/Nor Fairly Very Don’t know/

% -*(./+"0% -*(./+"0% % 1.//*(./+"0% 1.//*(./+"0 Never use

Number of police on the beat 1 2 3 4 5 6

Time taken to respond to calls 1 2 3 4 5 6

Effectiveness in dealing with 1 2 3 4 5 6

problems in the area

EK"#F2#/%0#1(@,#;1*3-.,4#(5,-#E!NEOP#&1()#2(;*3*)*,'#-%#)1,/#0',#*4#)1,#(.,(6#893,(',#)*;?#(33#)1()#(773/<

St James’ Park 1 The Living Well Youth Bus 2 Church 3 School (after school facilities) 4

Pub 5 Community Centre 6 None 7

If they use other facilities in the area, please specify:

15. If you could choose a facility which would improve this area for young people, what would it be?

The Local Environment

16. How much, if at all, do you think that the following are a problem in Denton Holme and Longsowerby?

Major problem Minor problem No problem Don’t know

Empty or derelict shops and shop fronts 1 2 3 4

Rubbish/pollution in the river Caldew 1 2 3 4

Illegal dumping of household rubbish 1 2 3 4

Dog mess on pavements and in parks 1 2 3 4

Rubbish and litter lying around the street 1 2 3 4

Overgrown plants and weeds on footpath verges 1 2 3 4

17. What particular street or areas of Denton Holme and Longsowerby are of concern to you?

EQ"#$%&#'()*'+,-#(.,#/%0#&*)1#)1,#2%33%&*45#('7,;)'#%2#)1*'#(.,(6

Very Fairly Neither/Nor Fairly Very Don’t know/

% -*(./+"0% -*(./+"0% % 1.//*(./+"0% 1.//*(./+"0 Never use

Quality of street lighting 1 2 3 4 5 6

Availability of parks and open spaces 1 2 3 4 5 6

Upkeep of parks and open spaces 1 2 3 4 5 6

Quality of cycle paths in the area 1 2 3 4 5 6

Number of on street litter bins 1 2 3 4 5 6

Community Facilities

19. How often do you visit the Morley Street community centre?

Every day 3 or 4 times a week Around once a week Less than once a week Never visit the centre

1 2 3 4 5

Page 243

CC

CJ/N

.172

31

Your future in your hands

!R"#F2#/%0#'(*-#G4,@,.#@*'*)#)1,#;,4).,H#2%.#I0,')*%4#J!P#&1/#*'#)1*'6#893,(',#)*;?#(33#)1,#.,('%4'#)1()#(773/<

Didn’t know it existed 1 Don’t know what goes on there 2 Don’t know when it is open 3

="3()"%./%>3?"$,&4.36% <%%="3()"%./%0.'+,>$(%(&%6"(%(&% @%%1&3A(%$.B"%*3C%&'%(7"%*,(.#.(."/%%%%%%%%%%%%D

Activities are too expensive 7 Don’t have time 8 Not really interested 9

21. Would you support the development of a new community centre/sports hall building in the

St James Park area? Yes 1 No 2

22. What service would you like to see run from a new community centre/sports hall development

Doctors surgery 1 Dentists 2 Healthy Living Workshop 3 Opticians 4

Other (Please State)

!J"##S1*;1#(5,#5.%07#(.,#/%0#*4#893,(',#)*;?#%4,#%43/<

16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

!K"##T)14*;#%.*5*4#N#93,(',#)*;?#)1,#:%M#&1*;1#/%0#2,,3#:,')#-,';.*:,'#/%0.#,)14*;#%.*5*4"##

# 893,(',#)*;?#%4,#:%M#%43/<

White British 1 Asian Indian 10

White Irish 2 Asian Pakistani 11

White Gypsy/Roma or other Travelling Community 3 Asian Bangladeshi 12

Any other white background (please specify below) 4 Any other Asian background (please specify below) 13

Black/Black British 5 White and Black Caribbean 14

Black Caribbean 6 White and Black African 15

Black African 7 White and Asian 16

Any other black background (please specify below) 8 Other mixed background (please specify below) 17

Asian/Asian British 9 Chinese 18

Other 19

E'%C&>%/F",.+"0%G&(7")A%F$"*/"%/(*("H

25. Finally, if there are any important issues you feel have not been covered by this questionnaire please

write your thoughts in the space below:

Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey.

Please return all completed questionnaires no later than 9 March.

If you would like to be entered in the £50 prize draw please remember to include your contact details below:

Name: Telephone Number or Address:

Page 244

St Aidans Community First

What is Community First?What is Community First?What is Community First?What is Community First?

Community First is an England-wide programme, funded by the Office for Civil Society, on behalf of

the Government. It will run until March 2015. A fund of money, worth £30m, has been created to

help communities come together, become more resilient, and make their local area a better place to

live. The funds have been distributed to 600 areas across England, selected by CDF according to

several criteria to encourage people to give time and expertise to local projects.

Community First Panels: Community First Panels: Community First Panels: Community First Panels: Each of the 600 areas will have their own panel, comprised of local people

to represent their community. They will be involved in creating a plan for the local area, raising

awareness of the funds, and planning how they will match and spend the money.

What does this mean for you?What does this mean for you?What does this mean for you?What does this mean for you?

St Aidans has been selected as one of the 600 areas to receive Community First funding.

A Community First panel has been set up in your area, made up of local people. Their contact details

can be found on the back of this leaflet. Get in touch to find out more or get involved.

How can I get involved?How can I get involved?How can I get involved?How can I get involved?

Come to the launch event to find out more information and put your ideas forward in to the

community plan

Send us your views about the area, through email, Facebook or come to one of our meetings

Work with your friends and neighbours to put together a community project and apply for funding

Page 245

Can I apply for funding?Can I apply for funding?Can I apply for funding?Can I apply for funding?

Funding is available forFunding is available forFunding is available forFunding is available for any any any any community group whosecommunity group whosecommunity group whosecommunity group whose projects projects projects projects meet meet meet meet the the the the prioritprioritprioritpriorities ies ies ies for the local areafor the local areafor the local areafor the local area. . . .

Agreed priorities for Agreed priorities for Agreed priorities for Agreed priorities for St Aidans areareareare::::

• Education – eg: Evening classes/Equipment/Educational projects

• Health and wellbeing – eg: Healthy eating projects/First Aid

• Support for Youth

• Support for Elderly and Senior Citizens

• Safety – Security/personal safety

• Projects that enhance the local community and local environment

So far St Aidans Community So far St Aidans Community So far St Aidans Community So far St Aidans Community firstfirstfirstfirst have Recommended the following grants to projects have Recommended the following grants to projects have Recommended the following grants to projects have Recommended the following grants to projects

benefitting the community benefitting the community benefitting the community benefitting the community

Group nameGroup nameGroup nameGroup name ProjectProjectProjectProject Total amount Total amount Total amount Total amount

Friends of MelbournFriends of MelbournFriends of MelbournFriends of Melbourne Parke Parke Parke Park Parks celebration event £2000

Multi Cultural CarlisleMulti Cultural CarlisleMulti Cultural CarlisleMulti Cultural Carlisle Cultures Bazaar £276

25252525thththth Carlisle CubsCarlisle CubsCarlisle CubsCarlisle Cubs Start up costs for the group £750

TS AstuteTS AstuteTS AstuteTS Astute Running costs for youth project £400

CA1 Green GroupCA1 Green GroupCA1 Green GroupCA1 Green Group Tidying and planting project in St Aidans area £1200

St Aidans Football ClubSt Aidans Football ClubSt Aidans Football ClubSt Aidans Football Club Football strips and training equipment £450

Greystone Youth projectGreystone Youth projectGreystone Youth projectGreystone Youth project Accredited courses and celebration event £1500

Close street residents group Close street residents group Close street residents group Close street residents group Residential community action £500

Where can I find more information?Where can I find more information?Where can I find more information?Where can I find more information?

Example of Example of Example of Example of Local Projects: Local Projects: Local Projects: Local Projects:

The CA1 project have received

funding from St Aidans Community

First to enhance the local

environment through improving the

look of and regeneration of local

parkland spaces

Local Projects: Local Projects: Local Projects: Local Projects:

Page 246

You can find more information about the Community First programme here:

www.staidanscommunityfirst.co.uk

Or like us on the Facebook page, search for “St Aidans Community First”

Your local Community First Panel is run by:

Joyce Ackerley (Main contact and resident of St AIdans)

Susan Watson (Resident of St Aidans)

Lucy Metcalfe (Resident of St Aidans)

Cllr Reg Watson (County and City Councillor for St AIdans)

Cllr Lucy Patrick (City Councillor for St Aidans)

Cllr Anne Quilter (City Councillor for St Aidans)

Gareth Weber (Panel Partner for the group and Manager of Greystone Community Centre)

To get in touch with the group email:

[email protected]

Other useful local resources:

Greystone Community centre

Cumbria County Council Area Support Team

Community First is funded by the OCS, part of the Cabinet Office, on behalf of the Government

and delivered by CDF, in partnership with:

Page 247

Page 248

This page is intentionally left blank

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Chief Executive

COMMUNITY ASSET TRANSFER – BRAMPTON INFANT SCHOOL BUILDINGS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report presents a request from the Brampton and Beyond Community Trust seeking the approval of members to proceed with the Community Asset Transfer process.

1.2 Brampton and Beyond Community Trust seek to proceed with the transfer of ownership of buildings formerly part of Brampton Infant School.

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 The County Council Plan advocates that the council should act as an enabler so that people can make a difference to their own lives and the quality of life in their communities. In particular the project addresses ‘The council supporting communities to play more of a role and work in partnership with them’.

2.2 Community Asset Transfers contribute towards the Council’s underpinning aim of making Cumbria County Council as effective and efficient as possible.

2.3 The Brampton and Beyond Community Trust Strategic Development Plan identifies asset acquisition and investment as a way to ‘improve financial security and provide funding for development for the benefit of the whole community’

2.4 Local Committee for Carlisle is mindful of equality issues and duly considers that its actions and decisions do not result in inequality of service provision or exclusion from participation. The work of Local Committee directly supports the Council’s wider equalities agenda.

2.5 The proposal directly supports the Council’s strategy for asset management.

Agenda Item 15

Page 249

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 Members are asked to note the request from Brampton and Beyond Community Trust to consider a Community Asset Transfer of buildings formerly part of Brampton Infant School.

3.2 Members are asked to provide their initial views regarding this request which will be reported to the Corporate Director when assessing the suitability of the property for a potential asset transfer.

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 The council has been approached by Brampton and Beyond Community Trust who are seeking the transfer of a council asset in order to support and enhance the work that they undertake and would like to develop in their community.

4.2 The Community Asset Transfer (CAT) process allows the Council to transfer properties or land for community benefit without seeking a market price for purchase, subject to certain conditions being met. The assets the council owns in local communities play an important part in enabling the community to come together and can support a range of activities and services which benefit the social and economic well being of an area, as well as provide opportunities to enhance the health and wellbeing of the local community.

4.3 The buildings that were formerly part of Brampton Infant school are situated on both sides of Moat road. Brampton and Beyond Community Trust want to use these buildings as part of their ongoing development and delivery of services to the local community.

4.4 The trust would like to use the buildings in the medium term to maintain services that are currently being delivered in the Community centre which will be undergoing improvement works in the near future. It also wants to utilise the buildings as a long term asset for the trust to provide collateral towards community businesses, projects and the long term sustainability of the trust.

4.5 Brampton and Beyond Community Trust are seeking to provide facilities and services to the area to support the health and well being of the wider community. This includes the facilitation of social welfare projects, recreational and leisure activities alongside the continued development of the community centre and growth of services accessible to the community.

4.6 The trust will work with the community to provide additional benefit and resources through the proposed asset transfer. Options that the trust is considering include; affordable housing for shared ownership or rent; visitor hostel; increased community recreational and leisure activities.

4.7 The Trust will seek to resource further feasibility work on the development of the asset should they be invited to proceed, alongside a formal community consultation which will form the basis for preparing a business case for future consideration.

Page 250

4.8 The Area Support team will work with officers from across the council to support the Asset Transfer process. The group will keep members up to date on any significant issues arising from the process.

4.9 The process for a Community Asset Transfer is that on receipt of an Expression of Interest this is shared with the Local Committee and they are asked to give a view. The Expression of Interest, and the view of the Local Committee is then discussed at the Land and Property Monthly Review meeting with the Corporate Director to check the suitability of the asset and the group for a potential asset transfer of some form. The group will then be advised of this outcome and either asked to submit a full application or advised that the property/use is not suitable for an asset transfer.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 Members may support the commencement of the Community Asset Transfer process.

5.2 Members may wish to propose other action.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 There are no direct financial implications for Carlisle Local Committee budgets.

6.2 Commencement of the community asset transfer process would require a full financial evaluation and approval by Cabinet.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 On 13 September 2012, Cabinet resolved to adopt a Property Disposals Policy and a Community Asset Transfer Policy, both of which provided that future decisions to transfer property to community groups for less than market value would be made by Cabinet.

7.2 Where the County Council disposes of its land, it is under a statutory duty pursuant to section 123 of the Local Government Act 1972 to do so at the best consideration (i.e. price) reasonably obtainable, unless a consent to a disposal at an undervalue has been obtained from the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State has issued a general consent allowing local authorities to dispose of land at an undervalue where they consider that to do so will help to secure the promotion or improvement of the economic, social or environmental well-being of the area, provided that the difference between the value of the land interest to be disposed of and the consideration being accepted by the Council ("the undervalue") is £2,000,000 (two million pounds) or less. The County Council may, therefore, rely on this general consent in relation to the disposal of its land if it considers that the well-being benefits would justify selling the land at a discount.

Page 251

7.3 The local committee is being asked to give its views on the proposed Community Asset Transfers to inform Cabinet and to enable Cabinet to make a decision as to whether the proposed transfers should be approved. The Community Asset Transfer policy of Cumbria County Council sets out the principle that the views of the relevant local committee should be sought in respect of any proposed community asset transfer.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 Brampton and Beyond Community Trust endeavours to work in close partnership with the wider community in a range of ways, developing increased community services from the former Brampton Infant School site is one. The Community Asset Transfer will enable the trust to proceed and undertake the necessary measures in order to ensure improved and enhanced facilities are available to more members of the local community.

8.2 The Area Support Team will work with officers from a range of disciplines within the council to support the Community Asset Transfer process.

Jill Stannard Chief Executive March 2013 APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Expression of interest form Appendix 2 – Map of Brampton Infants School Electoral Divisions: Brampton and Gilsland

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

No

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? No

Page 252

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and necessary approvals have been obtained.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] No previous relevant decisions. CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny. BACKGROUND PAPERS No background papers REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Niall Mcnulty Tel: 01228 226570 Email: [email protected]

Page 253

Page 254

Appendix 1 – Expression of interest form

1. Contact Details

Describe the asset for which transfer is request (e.g. playing field, community hall, office, residential property, etc.)

Redundant Victorian Infant School buildings on both sides of Moat Street, Brampton, and associated land.

Name of Organisation Brampton and Beyond Community Trust

Address Brampton Community Centre Union Lane Brampton

Post Code CA8 1BX

Is this the same address as the asset you are applying for transfer? If no please give address and postcode

No. Brampton Infant School, Moat Street, Brampton. CA8 1UJ

Contact name

R.N.Allan

Telephone Number (for contact person)

016977 3111

Email address (for contact person)

[email protected]

2. Your Organisation

Are you a voluntary and community sector organisation which is a legal entity, or a legally constituted through a consortia agreement?

Yes.

What type of organisation are you? (E.g. a registered charity, community interest company or charitable incorporated organisation, a not for profit company etc.) When was it established? Explain your governance arrangements?

Governance is in accordance with the articles of association. Membership of the Trust is open to residents of the area, who elect the Board on a 3-year cycle at each AGM. The Board directs the work of the Trust between general meetings, delegating functions to committees, groups and individuals as appropriate. The Board meets every 1-2 months and receives reports on all Trust business.

Company limited by guarantee (Company No. 7304443) Registered charity (Charity Reg. No. 1138044)

Page 255

Describe what does your organisation does?

Explain why you are applying for a community asset transfer and how this will benefit the wider community?

3. Reasons for Transfer

The Trust seeks to provide facilities and services to the area of benefit to support the health and well being of the community, including the facilitation of social welfare, recreational and leisure activities, the provision of a community centre with a wide range of services, and any other charitable purposes as may from time to time be determined. It will set up subsidiary businesses, or support the setting up of community businesses, to achieve its charitable objects. It is currently operating Brampton Community Centre, preparing a development project to improve the Community Centre facilities and provide Extra Care Housing on the same site. It is also supporting the development of a community-based Anaerobic Digester project and supporting events co-ordination and promotion across the area. The Trust is also actively considering developing several other community services and projects, including health and well being activity through the Neighbourhood Care Programme, support for businesses through the Rural Growth Network pilot, and addressing the long standing affordable housing shortage in the area.

The acquisition of the former Brampton Infant School property has the potential to benefit the community by strengthening the Trust through:

1. Providing an option for maintaining serves in the medium term during the

delivery of the Community Centre improvement and Extra Care Housing

project.

2. Providing a long term asset for the Trust and provide collateral for the

development of community business.

The community could directly benefit through the development of the property by the Trust to meet the needs of the community. The options that the Trust is considering include: affordable housing (for shared ownership or rent) and a visitor hostel, meeting local housing needs and a gap in the visitor economy respectively. The Trust would also intend to consider other community use and other employment and service options with limited demands for vehicular access in this residential cul de sac. All this will require further feasibility work, which the Trust will seek to resource and commission if it is invited by the Council to proceed to preparing a business case. This further work will also include involvement and consultation with other community interested parties.

Page 256

How will your organisation meet all the costs associated with taking on ownership (leasehold or freehold) of the asset?

CONFIRM IN BOX BELOW THAT THIS APPLICATION HAS THE FULL SUPPORT OF YOUR ORGANISATION

Name of person completing the form

Position in organisation Date

This Expression of Interest was approved by the Brampton and Beyond Trust Board at meeting on 30 November 2012.

Bob Allan

Chair

30 November 2012

The Trust will identify the costs through a business planning process that would establish the capital and revenue implications of the proposal, taking professional advice as necessary. Before entering this stage, the Trust would seek grant funding from suitable funding bodies to enable it to commission the feasibility and business case development work.

Page 257

Page 258

This page is intentionally left blank

Page 259

Page 260

This page is intentionally left blank

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Chief Executive

COMMUNITY ASSET TRANSFER – LAND ADJACENT TO WALTON VILLAGE GREEN

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report presents a request from Walton Parish Council seeking the approval of members to proceed with the Community Asset Transfer process.

1.2 Walton Parish Council seeks to proceed with the transfer of ownership of two pieces of land which are situated adjacent to the current village green.

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 The County Council Plan advocates that the Council should act as an enabler so that people can make a difference to their own lives and the quality of life in their communities. In particular the project addresses ‘The Council supporting communities to play more of a role and work in partnership with them’.

2.2 Community Asset Transfers contribute towards the Council’s underpinning aim of making Cumbria County Council as effective and efficient as possible.

2.3 Local Committee for Carlisle is mindful of equality issues and duly considers that its actions and decisions do not result in inequality of service provision or exclusion from participation. The work of Local Committee directly supports the Council’s wider equalities agenda.

2.4 The proposal directly supports the Council’s strategy for asset management.

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 Members are asked to note the request from Walton Parish Council to consider a Community Asset Transfer of the land adjacent to the current village green.

Agenda Item 16

Page 261

3.2 Members are asked to provide their initial views regarding this request which will be reported to the Corporate Director when assessing the suitability of the property for a potential asset transfer.

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 The Council has been approached by Walton Parish Council who are seeking the transfer of a Council asset in order to benefit the parishioners and community of the area.

4.2 The Community Asset Transfer (CAT) process allows the Council to transfer properties or land for community benefit without seeking a market price for purchase, subject to certain conditions being met. The assets which the Council owns in local communities play an important part in enabling the community to come together and can support a range of activities and services which benefit the social and economic well being of an area, as well as provide opportunities to enhance the health and wellbeing of the local community.

4.3 Two pieces of land that are adjacent to Walton Village Green are currently owned by the Council but are regularly used by the local community as part of the village green.

4.4 Walton Parish Council maintains the present village green as part of its responsibilities to the parish; this includes the regular maintenance of the adjacent land owned by the Council and the subject of this CAT. The Parish Council also insures the area, including adjacent land, for public liability.

4.5 The Parish Council are committed to maintaining the plots of land that are the subject of this CAT, and ensuring they will be protected for community use now and in the future. Walton Parish Council will treat the land as a registered part of the current village green and in this way secure its continued use by the local community.

4.6 The Area Support Team will work with officers from across the Council to support the Asset Transfer process. The team will keep members up to date on any significant issues arising from the process.

4.7 The process for a Community Asset Transfer is on receipt of an Expression of Interest this is shared with the Local Committee and they are asked to give a view. The Expression of Interest, and the view of the Local Committee is then discussed at the Land and Property Monthly Review meeting with the Corporate Director to check the suitability of the asset and the group for a potential asset transfer of some form. The group will then be advised of this outcome and either asked to submit a full application or advised that the property/use is not suitable for an asset transfer.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 Members may support the commencement of the CAT process.

5.2 Members may wish to propose other action.

Page 262

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 There are no direct financial implications for Carlisle Local Committee budgets.

6.2 Commencement of the CAT would require a full financial evaluation and approval by Cabinet.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 On 13 September 2012, Cabinet resolved to adopt a Property Disposals Policy and a Community Asset Transfer Policy, both of which provided that future decisions to transfer property to community groups for less than market value would be made by Cabinet.

7.2 Where the County Council disposes of its land, it is under a statutory duty pursuant to section 123 of the Local Government Act 1972 to do so at the best consideration (i.e. price) reasonably obtainable, unless a consent to a disposal at an undervalue has been obtained from the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State has issued a general consent allowing local authorities to dispose of land at an undervalue where they consider that to do so will help to secure the promotion or improvement of the economic, social or environmental well-being of the area, provided that the difference between the value of the land interest to be disposed of and the consideration being accepted by the Council ("the undervalue") is £2,000,000 (two million pounds) or less. The County Council may, therefore, rely on this general consent in relation to the disposal of its land if it considers that the well-being benefits would justify selling the land at a discount.

7.3 The local committee is being asked to give its views on the proposed Community Asset Transfers to inform Cabinet and to enable Cabinet to make a decision as to whether the proposed transfers should be approved. The Community Asset Transfer policy of Cumbria County Council sets out the principle that the views of the relevant local committee should be sought in respect of any proposed community asset transfer.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 Walton Parish Council endeavours to work in close partnership with the wider community in a range of ways. Maintaining and preserving the village green is one. The CAT will enable the Parish Council to legally own these areas of land adjacent to the village green and ensure that they continue to be used by the community.

8.2 The Area Support Team will work with officers from a range of disciplines within the Council to support the CAT process.

Jill Stannard Chief Executive March 2013

Page 263

APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Expression of interest form Appendix 2 – Map identifying land Electoral Divisions: Brampton and Gilsland

Executive Decision Yes

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

No

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? No

N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the

expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and necessary approvals have been obtained.

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS Cabinet – September 2012 – Approval of Community Asset Transfer Process CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny BACKGROUND PAPERS No background papers REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Niall Mcnulty Tel: 01228 226570 Email: [email protected]

Page 264

Community Asset Transfer Expression of Interest Form

Version 1 February 2012

Reference Number :( for office use only)

Please read through the guidance notes below before you start to fill in this form.

It has been designed so you can provide the standard information we need to

assess your application. Your answers should show that you are thoroughly

considering the requirements of a full proposal. Before you fill in this form please make sure that both your organisation and the plans you have for the asset once transferred meets ALL the criteria set out in the Community Asset Transfers Policy Position and Guidance Document. It is vital your full proposal contributes to the council’s priorities, the Cumbria Community Strategy which focus on better outcomes for the people of Cumbria and has the support of the community in which it is based/serves. In this expression of interest you are asked to describe your plans so think about those requirements when you fill in this form. Sustainability for your service delivery and therefore asset use is also a key element. You need to show that you have thought about this before making an expression of interest and then demonstrate how you will do this in your full proposal.

Please provide us with as much detail as you can, the boxes on the form expand to fit the content so that you can do this. Tell us how the transfer of the asset will bring benefits to the both the wider community and the community it currently serves. Once your application has been received a named council officer will be appointed as your contact throughout the application process.

We would prefer to receive proposals electronically, but will accept hard

copies by post where necessary.

If you have any queries, please contact

Allerdale/Copeland – Ted Thwaites phone/email

Carlisle/Eden – David Sheard phone/email

South Lakes/Barrow – Karen Johnston phone/email

Page 265

1. Contact Details

Describe the asset for which

transfer is request (e.g. playing

field, community hall, office,

residential property, etc.)

Two pieces of land within Walton village.

Name of Organisation Walton Parish Council Address Hill House

Walton Brampton Cumbria

Post Code CA8 2DY

Is this the same address as

the asset you are applying for

transfer? If no please give

address and postcode

Plot 1 – CA8 2DH (marked on map as A) Plot 2 – CA8 2DH (marked on map as B)

Contact name

Sarah Kyle

Telephone Number

(for contact person) 016977 2769

Email address

(for contact person) [email protected]

2. Your Organisation

Are you a voluntary and community sector organisation which is a legal entity, or a legally

constituted through a consortia agreement?

Local government tier – legal entity

What type of organisation are you? (E.g. a registered charity, community interest company

or charitable incorporated organisation, a not for profit company etc.)

When was it established?

Explain your governance arrangements?

Governed by legal framework for parish councils and standing orders.

Parish Council, established 1894.

Page 266

Describe what does your organisation does?

Explain why you are applying for a community asset transfer and how this will benefit the

wider community?

o

3. Reasons for Transfer

Walton Parish Council is responsible as the third tier of local government directly for

the parishioners of Walton. We have sound governance arrangements and operate

through open and accountable co-operative processes, with strong monitoring

evaluation, performance and financial management systems.

We pride ourselves in being responsible for ensuring the residents of our parish gain

value for money through their precept with regards to community/ social

/environmental and economic benefits. Being a tier of local government we are non-

profit making and we have specified community benefit objectives through our

recently updated Community Led Plan. We are also compliant with health and

safety issues and other relevant legislation.

We would like to stress that due to the nature of the assets applied for and the fact

that we are a Parish Council we would like to request that a full application process

not be applied to this case and a freehold transfer be made.

We are applying for a freehold asset transfer of the two plots of land marked A and

B on the attached map. One of our many responsibilities as a Parish Council is to

maintain the Village Green in the centre of our parish – we do this by carrying out

grass cutting up to 10 times per year and we insure the area for public liability. We

are also responsible for the insurance and maintenance of any trees on this land.

As these two parcels of land fall adjacent to our Village Green we actually are

already maintaining these areas for the benefit of the parishioners through the

precept and we would like this fact acknowledged by becoming the legal land

owners.

In keeping with the rest of the open green spaces in our village we will commit to

maintain that the plots of land will be protected for community use – as they are at

present. This will either be by registering them as village green or by treating them

as registered village green without the registration process. They areas will

therefore continue to be a community asset and support the enhancement of our

rural village and by allowing us to take ownership of the land it will enable us to

continue with our regular maintenance programme – thereby supporting

environmental well-being. The up-keep of our village is very important to our

parishioners and contributes also to their social well-being.

One potential future use of the assets is to register them as Village Green so that

an area of land adjacent to the village hall could be de-registered. This could allow

the extension of the village hall thereby further supporting the our small community by providing them with better amenities.

Page 267

How will your organisation meet all the costs associated with taking on ownership (leasehold

or freehold) of the asset?

CONFIRM IN BOX BELOW THAT THIS APPLICATION HAS THE FULL SUPPORT OF

YOUR ORGANISATION

Name of person completing the form

Position in organisation Date

The Parish Council fully support this proposed asset transfer.

Sarah Kyle

Clerk & RFO

18 December 2012

As stated above, we are already responsible for paying for the assets maintenance

and insurance and so the granting of a freehold transfer will not increase our costs

as this is a cost we are already bearing.

The fact that we already maintain the assets demonstrates we have the skills and

capacity within our Council to effectively deliver services and manage the asset in

the future and we commit to fully comply with legislation and any statutory

requirements arising from transfer of the asset. We also commit to continue to bear

any costs associated with the upkeep, repair and maintenance of the asset; all

running costs, including insurance and also to comply with statutory and legislative

requirements, including inspections and health and safety requirements.

Money for the parish council is raised through taxation (precept). We have a stable

financial position and track record with a demonstrable financial plan.

Page 268

Appendix 2

Page 269

Page 270

This page is intentionally left blank

CARLISLE LOCAL COMMITTEE: 20 March 2013 APPOINTMENT OF AUTHORITY GOVERNORS OF NURSERY, PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS Schedule of Recommendations

STATUS AND NAME

OF SCHOOL

NO OF LEA GOVERNORS

TO BE APPOINTED

RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDED

BY

(1)

(2) (3) (4)

Primary Shankhill C of E Primary School Fir Ends Primary School Upperby Primary School

1

1

1

Mr Steven Bowditch (re-appt) 4 The Crescent Carlisle CA3 9NL Ms Kathleen Thompson (re-appt) The Beeches Barclose Scaleby Carlisle CA6 4LH Mr William Atkinson 17 Turnberry Way Carlisle CA3 0QL

Councillor Tarbitt Councillor Tarbitt Councillor Young

Agenda Item 17

Page 271

Page 272

This page is intentionally left blank

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE

Meeting date: 20 March 2013

From: Chief Executive

CARLISLE SPORTS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION (SPAAF)

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 This report provides members with details of a presentation received by the 0 – 19 Task & Finish Group on the activities of the Carlisle & District SPAAF ( Sport & Physical Activity Alliance Foundation) over the last twelve months.

2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS

2.1 Cumbria County Council has the strategic aims detailed below, this report summarises work completed in Carlisle that targets all three Council Plan priorities, which are

Ø challenging poverty in all its forms;

Ø ensuring that the most vulnerable people in our communities receive the support they need; and

Ø improving the chances in life of the most disadvantaged in Cumbria.

3.0 RECOMMENDATION

3.1 Members are asked to note the contents of the report for information purposes.

Agenda Item 18

Page 273

4.0 BACKGROUND

4.1 Carlisle SPAAF is now a not for profit social enterprise company developed following the withdrawal of funding to Carlisle City Council for sports delivery.

4.2 The organisation now delivers sports and educational activities across the Carlisle District covering all age groups but in particular children and young people.

4.3 SPAAF has in particular worked with organisations such as Parish Council’s and the Carlisle Community Centre’s Federation to widen the offer made within their communities and in working with these organisations to deliver new, sustainable community activities in their localities.

4.4 The presentation and work areas in Appendices 1 & 2 give members an indication of the delivery sustained in the Carlisle District over the last twelve months.

5.0 OPTIONS

5.1 This report is for information only.

6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS

6.1 There are no financial implications within this report.

7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

7.1 There are no legal implications within this report.

8.0 CONCLUSION

8.1 This report sets out for members the developing work delivery of the Carlisle & District SPAAF

Jill Stannard Chief Executive

28 February 2013

Page 274

APPENDICES 1. Copy of presentation to 0-19 task & finish group. 2. Scheme of work for Carlisle SPAAF 2012 - 2013 Electoral Divisions: Carlisle District

Executive Decision No

Key Decision No

If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A

Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No

If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained?

N/A

Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? If so, give details below.

No

Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been undertaken?

N/A

Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? N/A

PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] “No previous relevant decisions”. CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY “Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny”. BACKGROUND PAPERS “No background papers” REPORT AUTHOR Contact: Paul Carrigan, Area Support Team North, 01228 221054 [email protected]

Page 275

Page 276

This page is intentionally left blank

����������� ������������������������

�������

������������������������������������

� �!���"������������������������#�$� %%�%���

������&���'������()�*������+,)+��

����������'���-���������-�.����������(� �������

������������

��������������������#���������������

���������������������������-�'����������

����-�����������������#�����������/�������'��/����/�

������������-������������������������

0��������������������������������)1234

5����)� �������������6

�������������

���� �������������������������

��������������������������� ����������� ����������

��������

����� �� ��������� ����������� � ��������� ���

��� ����� �!� ��"

Page 277

7��������#���������+,)+$+,)(

��������0����

��������#�����$�% &&�!�'����� ���(�)���������"

� ��$�*������������% (�����

�+, ������

-).+�#�����$�

/�� ��0�������� ���������

.�1 �*���$��������

2�����,���3���4��������

���� ���������#�����$�!+ ��� ��5�.���5�*��6�$5�2������"

������ $���� �����������

��������-�����

�������� ����*+7�+� � $������

-��.����� ��� �

/����� *��� ��4��8�� ��

���������#�����

2������

� $�������

�99

�#�������#�

��������������������� $

�� ��$�*����

�4������ ��� ����

�#�#����� ��� ��

�������

����� $��������% 4������������5�+� ����������.������

�*��� �$�� $

������2������:

�,����������� ��:

�2�����;�� �����

��������1�9�����������4���������

5�����+��&�������������#����������#�������6

�<�$����9����$���������4� ����������

���� �������� ����� ���,���� �������:������

���� ������������������ �������

������������� �������������

�,��������% ����17��

������� $����� �+� �� ���,���

� :��������� ����������%���� ��� ��5�+1+5���������

������ $�,���� ����� �=�

�3����<�����

� : ��������� �<�����

�.�������������6������

Page 278

8���%�������������9�

0�#����������:��

��������

>� ���������� ��

���=������������=���

Page 279

���������������� �������

���������������� �������������

������ ���������������

���������������

� ����������������� ����������

���������������

�������������

��� ������!����������

������"����������

�����������������

#����� $$���������

��� ������!���������

%����������������

���� ��������������

& �����������������

���������������

��������������������

� ����������������� ���������

�� �������������

'�����#��� ���������

�������!���������

��� � �������������������(�)�� � ���

����������

����������

��������

*�������

"��������

������

+������

,������������

���������

������ �������

����������

-��������.�����

*�����������������.������*���������� � ���

������

*� ���/�������������)�� � � ���

*� ��� ��� ����)����������������.����

�)01�� �����2� � ���"� � �������������������

��� � ���������

+��������, ��� � �������������������������

��3 ����� ����������������� ����"� � ���

0�� � � ���

+ �� ����������)���!�����������������4�

#�$$���4������� ������4����������4������������

# ����0 ��2 �������������

���������1����5 ����������������6������ 7�# ����

��� ���

�� ������5 ��������������������������6������ 7�# ����

��� ���

#����������� �������������������������6�����������

��� ���

��� �������� �������������������������6���� �����

��� ��������

,������������ � �����������6����������

��� ���

��

Page 280

COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR CARLISLE Notes of a County Council Local Committee for Carlisle Seminar held on Tuesday 22 January 2013 at The Courts, Carlisle at 9.30 am.

PRESENT

Mr CF Weber (Chair)

Mr T Allison Mr J Bell Mrs H Bradley Mr LN Fisher Mr J Mallinson (Vice-Chair)

Mr NH Marriner Mr H McDevitt Mr I Stockdale Mr A Toole Mr R Watson

Also in attendance:-

Mrs L Harker - Democratic Services Officer Mr A Moss - Assistant Director – Highways and Transportation Ms J Muller - Associate Director of Public Health, NHS Cumbria Dr D Roberts - Assistant Director – Policy and Performance Mr DM Sheard - Area Support Manager Mr J Sims - Assistant Director – People Management Ms A Smith - Strategy Officer, Adult and Local Services Mr P Woodhouse - County Manager - General Social Care Commissioning Apologies for absence were received from Mr RW Betton, Mrs EA Mallinson, Mrs V Tarbitt and Mr SF Young. 1. WELCOME AND SETTING THE SCENE

The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. Jamie Sims, Assistant Director – People Management then provided an overview of the seminar. 2. HIGHWAYS RESTRUCTURE CONSULTATION

Mr A Moss, Assistant Director – Highways and Transportation gave members a presentation on the consultation that was being carried out on the new highways structure. He explained that the primary reason for the restructure was the transition of Capita and Amey staff back to the County Council which could result in the duplication of posts, skills etc. He went on to outline the restructuring and service changes which would include:

Ø Working differently and flexibly Ø Reshaping approach to local committees

Agenda Item 19

Page 281

Ø Greater value for money from procurement Ø Reviewing charges

He outlined the four proposed structures as being Strategic Asset Management, Network Development, Network Management and Integrated Transport and gave a detailed explanation as to the functions of each one. Members asked how the new proposed structure would affect the support the Local Committee received and were informed that within Network Management there would be three strategic areas instead of six, one of which would cover both the Carlisle and Eden areas. Members expressed their concerns about an officer covering two areas and were assured that the Committee would still have a dedicated officer to deal with any matters. The Chair asked that he be informed the name of the officer who would deal with the matters of the Committee as soon as this information was available. During the course of discussion members emphasised that it was of the utmost importance that staff were consulted and updated on any developments taking place. They also emphasised the need to retain the excellent experienced staff which the Directorate already had in order to retain the high level of services which were currently delivered. Members then asked whether there were any future plans for the transferred ‘Claimed Rights’ staff to be located in Carlisle to which the officer replied that those staff would probably be deployed from the Dalston and Brampton sites. Finally, members were informed that the proposed effective start date for the new highways structure would be 1 June 2013. The Chair thanked Mr Moss for his presentation and asked that the Committee be kept informed of any changes affecting their area. 3. PUBLIC HEALTH

Jane Muller, Associate Director of Public Health, NHS Cumbria briefed members on the Public Health responsibilities which would be transferred to the County Council when they became part of the Authority in April 2013. She explained that Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities would no longer exist but would be replaced by National Commissioning Boards, Clinical Commissioning Groups, Public Health in Local Authority and Public Health England and outlined what influenced health in their area. She then explained how each Directorate already contributed:

Ø Children’s Services – alcohol assertiveness and drug education and healthy weight programme for children/

Ø Adult and Local Services – core social care services, increasing sports

participation through ‘Active Cumbria’ and Mental Health Prevention

Page 282

Service and the Well Read Campaign, which gave access to self help books through the library service.

Ø Safer and Stronger Communities – community fire safety, preparation

for both environmental and human health emergencies, combating doorstep crime and controlling zoonotic diseases.

Ø Chief Executive’s Office – working to combat prejudicial incidents and

hate crime.

Ø Environment – tacking social exclusion for elderly and disabled groups through community transport schemes.

The Associate Director of Public Health then went on to discuss the new public health responsibilities and outlined initiatives in public health during 2012:

Ø commissioning of new sexual health clinics Ø commissioning suicide prevention training for groups and businesses Ø led strategy to reduce winter mortality Ø managed ‘Cough Cough’ cancer awareness campaign Ø developed county’s first workplace wellbeing charter Ø successfully lobbied for clearer food labelling Ø first health check programme Ø delivered first mass quit campaign

She went on to explain the ways of working and informed members that approximately 27 full-time public health staff would be transferring to the County Council with an annual budget of around £14.2m initially, rising to over £15m the following year. She outlined the mandatory services which were required for public health and explained a pilot project ‘Cool for Life’ which was taking place which encouraged families to attend meetings, either voluntarily or through referral from a GP etc, where children were weighed and measured with discussions taking place around healthy eating and lifestyle. She emphasised that early intervention and health checks were important to try and eliminate problems later on in life. Members were informed that the formal transfer of staff, functions and budget would take place on 2 April 2013 but that shadow working had been in place since November 2012. During discussions members were told that initially staff transferring to the County Council would become part of the Chief Executive’s Directorate. The Chair thanked Jane Muller for her informative presentation and asked that members be kept informed of any future developments regarding the transfer.

Page 283

4. NEIGHBOURHOOD CARE

Andrea Smith, Strategy Officer, Adult and Local Services briefed members on Neighbourhood Care. She explained to members that the scheme was an asset based community development programme which encouraged people to remain as independent as possible in their own home for as long as was viable and that the scheme would also be extended to provide support for people 18+. She said that one of the aims of the scheme was to make fewer people feel isolated and to create more integration in community settings by encouraging more help through neighbourhoods and volunteers and that Neighbourhood Care were working in partnership with communities to increase volunteering. She explained that existing activities such as home safety checks, cold calling zones, snow champions etc were also being built upon. She went on to inform the Committee that a sum of £153,000 would be invested in the scheme in the Carlisle area. A small amount of this money would be managed by the Cumbria Community Foundation and would be available to local organisations to apply for to help provide support and training for volunteers. She explained that a procurement process had been undertaken and the outcome of the evaluation was likely to be notified in the near future with the Neighbourhood Care Programme being implemented at the beginning of April 2013. Members were then informed that a Homeshare scheme had recently been commissioned and a pilot scheme was being carried out in the Carlisle and Eden areas with the aim of the project being to bring together an older and younger person who could share skills with the possibility of sharing their home free of charge in exchange for providing support. She emphasised that careful monitoring and matching processes were in place and were being managed through Age UK. During discussion concerns were raised about volunteer services playing a major part in the scheme and asked how standards could be maintained to which the officer explained that some services, ie Age UK, already had a vast amount of volunteers but there would be an expectation that monies from grants would be used to maintain standards. In conclusion, Andrea Smith said she would keep members informed of any future developments and additional information regarding the Carlisle area. The Chair thanked the Strategy Officer, Adult and Local Services for her informative presentation and said that members would welcome any additional information when it was available. 5. WELFARE REFORM

Dawn Roberts, Assistant Director – Policy and Performance briefed members on the potential impact of Welfare Reform in their area. She informed the Committee that Local Welfare Assistance would become the responsibility of the County

Page 284

Council from April 2013 when local provisions would be put in place to provide a service. She explained that the County Council would be accountable to respond to people living with a crisis situation ie crisis loan and this would be led by Adult and Local Services with the support of 3rd sector organisations to provide additional support including signposting to areas of support to help people avoid recurrence of the same situation. She explained that the Government’s objectives were to create the right incentives to get more people into work whilst protecting the most vulnerable and delivering fairness to those claiming benefit and to the taxpayer. She went on to inform members of the main changes explaining that the Programme would be delivered over a number of years. Whilst outlining the main changes she explained that new applications would be on-line which could put additional pressure on other organisations to help people access IT. Dawn Roberts then outlined the number of working-age benefit claimants (16-64 years) and informed members that 12.5% of the working age population in Carlisle were claiming out of work benefits - this would affect just over 8,000 people in Carlisle. The changes from April 2013 were then discussed and she explained that working-age housing benefit reduction could be enforced if a home was deemed too large for the occupier’s needs. During the course of discussion members expressed their concerns regarding this emphasising that vulnerable/elderly people needed additional rooms in their homes in case they needed extra support, ie an overnight stay may be required to give support to an elderly occupant, therefore, a spare bedroom in a house would be necessary. The Assistant Director – Policy and Performance concluded by outlining the key issues for Carlisle and informed the Committee that the Council were working closely with the DWP and 3rd sector organisations to ensure plans were in place to raise awareness of the changes and how this would affect individuals. The Chair thanked the Assistant Director – Policy and Performance for her informative presentation. 6. EXTRA CARE HOUSING

Peter Woodhouse, County Manager - General Social Care Commissioning briefed members on Extra Care Housing and highlighted schemes which were currently in place in Cumbria emphasising that this housing option gave people their own independence. He explained that the schemes offered a high standard of accommodation with the same facilities and assistance as those available in a residential home. He informed members that some of the schemes were in partnership with housing associations with the option in some cases for the properties to be bought by the occupant with conditions on sale.

Page 285

He informed members that the existing Extra Care Housing schemes were proving invaluable and that additional developments within Cumbria were being investigated. In conclusion the County Manager informed the Committee that all members would receive a copy of the DVD shown at the seminar and invited them to visit existing schemes. 7. SUMMING UP AND NEXT STEPS

In conclusion the Assistant Director thanked everyone for an interesting day and for fully engaging in the seminar.

The seminar ended at 12.40 pm

Page 286

LOCAL COMMITTEE CHAIRS AND LEADERSHIP

Minutes of a Meeting of the Local Committee Chairs and Leadership held on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 at 10.00 am at The Courts, Carlisle.

PRESENT:

Mr E Martin (Chair)

Mr GD Cook Miss HJ Fearon Mr R Guselli Mr G Humes Mr J Mallinson Mr FI Morgan

Mr EW Nicholson Mrs W Skillicorn Mr M Stephenson Mr C Weber Mrs J Willis Mr SF Young (Vice-Chair)

Also in Attendance:- Mrs J Crellin - Assistant Director - Finance Mrs J Currie - Senior Democratic Services Officer Mrs K Johnson - Area Support Manager - Barrow & South Lakeland Mr A Moss - Assistant Director - Highways and Transportation Dr D Roberts - Assistant Director Policy and Performance Mr D Sheard - Area Support Manager North Ms J Stannard - Chief Executive Mr T Thwaites - Area Support Manager

PART 1 – ITEMS CONSIDERED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE PUBLIC AND PRESS

57 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE An apology for absence was received from Mr D Marcus. 58 MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING RESOLVED, that the minutes of the last meeting held on Wednesday

28 November 2012 were agreed as a true and accurate record. 59 LOCAL COMMITTEE BUDGET ALLOCATIONS 2013/14 Members considered a report from the Corporate Director – Resources and presented by the Assistant Director – Finance, which sought to advise members of the proposed revenue and capital allocation for Local Committees in 2013/14.

Agenda Item 20

Page 287

She explained that total local committee allocations were considered by County Council as part of the overall budget setting process. Allocations to individual Committees were calculated based on the formula agreed by Cabinet on 3 March 2011. At the time of presenting the report details were still being finalised of the revenue settlement for individual authorities for 2013/14 although a draft budget was approved by Cabinet in December 2012 and a final budget would be proposed to Cabinet to recommend to County Council in February 2013. Cabinet had received reports at its meetings in November and December which set out the Minimum Revenue Planning Gap for 2013-14 of £18m and this was the basis of the options for budget consultation issued. The Probable Planning Gap however was not £21.6m, given the uncertainties arising from the significant changes in methodology and approach to the funding of local government by central government from 1 April 2013. The Provisional Local Government Finance Settlement was issued later than in previous years in December and the impact is an increase in the Probable Budget Planning Gap of £0.9m to £22.5m. If the Council were to accept the Council Tax Freeze Grant, however, this gap would increase by a further £2m to £24.5m. In relation to local committees the Assistant Director said Members would remember a number of changes were made to Local Committee budgets in 2011/12. Local Committees were given greater flexibility on the use of their budgets, and restrictions or the ring fencing associated with specific budget lines was removed to a certain degree. Council agreed on 16 February 2011 that Local Committee revenue budgets should include specific budgets for the following areas:

AREA USE

Highways Revenue To be used on highways activities

Neighbourhood Teams Budget for staffing, managed by the Assistant Director – Policy and Performance. Cannot be vired, but can be supplemented by other budgets.

Local Member Schemes Fully flexible. Local members to bring proposals for spending to Local Committee for decision.

General Provision Fully flexible

0-19 Services To be used in 0-19 projects and services Supporting guidance was issued.

Schools crossing patrols To be used on crossing patrols or road safety

Sandgate Hydrotherapy Pool

To be used to support the pool

Money Advice To be used on this area / contracts only.

To enable each Local Committee to manage its allocation to meet its priorities, it was proposed to increase the flexibility further and remove the ring fencing of 0-19 Services. The Highways Revenue budget areas were merged from the 2011/12 budget exercise, giving Local Committees discretion as to local priorities for spending revenue resources in line with Better Highways principles. The overriding priority was maintaining a safe and reliable highway network. This budget may only be

Page 288

spent on highways and street lighting. The methodology to allocate the highways budget between the Local Committees for 2013/14 was the same as that used in 2012/13. The consultation document for the draft revenue budget 2013/14 contained a proposal that all six of the Council’s Local Committees would see a cash reduction of 20% in relation to specific areas (0-19, general provision and school crossing patrol budget allocations). This cash reduction totalled £0.324m over the six Local Committees however, Local Committees would have the discretion to manage their budget within the new cash limit and so it is for each Local Committee to decide exactly how to support the local priorities within available budgets. The consultation document also contained a proposal in respect of Highways capital and revenue budgets where it was proposed to devolve a further £0.8m of capital funding to Local Committees from the Priority Transport Improvement Schemes (PTIS) capital highways budget, whilst at the same time the highways revenue budget for Local Committees would be reduced by £0.8m. This meant that the Local Committees would change the nature of some of the highways works they funded from maintenance, for example repair of potholes, to larger scale improvements such as resurfacing. Making use of capital funding in this way should allow available resources to be most effectively targeted to meet local highways priorities. The Neighbourhood Teams budget reflected the staffing at current levels for the teams. Overall, the teams were subject to a restructure to deliver part year savings in 2011/12, and full year savings in 2012/13. These budgets may not be vired by the Local Committees, but could be supplemented by other budgets. The General Provision could be used for any budget area including Neighbourhood Forum grants, and subsidising rents to Voluntary Organisations. This budget may be vired to support other areas. Whilst the 0-19 budget could be used to support 0-19 activities, including grants to youth organisations, but it was proposed that it may be used to support other areas. Local Committees could reduce the amount or increase the amount they spend on School Crossing Patrols, as determined by the School Crossing Patrols operational in their area and therefore any expenditure from the School Crossing Patrols allocation (once it is locally determined) must be spent either on crossing patrols or road safety The Money Advice budget reflected the recent Cabinet decision to procure for future services at the current budget level and the emphasis on the key Council priority of ensuring that the most vulnerable people in our communities received the support they needed. The 2011-12 and 2012-13 budgets included a Local Member Schemes budget. These budgets were for one year only, but it had been agreed that the resources could be spent over a period of two years and balances were carried forward. The 2012-13 allocation was funded from underspends across Council budgets in 2011-12 and was the decision of Council in February 2012. Any underspending on the 2012/13 Member schemes budget would be carried forward to 2013/14.

Page 289

The changes to both the revenue and capital allocations were equivalent, therefore for each Local Committee area the level of reduction in highways revenue funding was equally matched with the increase in highways capital funding. There was a £ for £ replacement, but the nature of the works to be undertaken would be capital. The Deputy Leader reminded everyone that it was crucial for local committees to agree their budget allocations in relation to highways as soon as practicable to allow works to be programmed. Members agreed that this should not wait until after the elections but should be agreed as soon as possible to prevent any delays in grant processes following the election. Members asked if any of the proposals would have an affect on the Better Highways Teams, and officers confirmed there should be no adverse impact on the work of the Better Highways Teams. The Chair of Barrow Local Committee felt that the formula was unfair, especially when Barrow was receiving budget reductions but had the most deprived areas of the county. He thought that budgets should be allocated on a needs basis and not on a population basis. This was debated by members, with some who felt this would be advantageous, whilst others felt the current formula used was adequate. The Deputy Leader said that this debate could only be reconsidered with the agreement of all the Chairs and Vice Chairs, and at this stage agreement could not be reached. It was suggested that this be looked at again in the near future, and that Scrutiny be invited to consider this, after the elections had taken place. RESOLVED, that the report be noted. 60 UNAUTHORISED SIGNS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SERVICE

PROCEDURE The Assistant Director – Highways and Transportation presented a report which briefed members on proposed changes to an existing highway service procedure; “Unauthorised Signs and Other Obstructions in the Highway”, and highlighted the political sensitivities of making any changes. The service procedure specifically dealt with A boards placed on pedestrian areas which had been a contentious issue with some disability groups. The changes followed an Ombudsman complaint about obstructions from A boards. The Ombudsman had recommended an increase in the absolute minimum width from 1.0m to 1.2m. The stated absolute minimum width of 1.2m would only be used in exceptional circumstances where an A board could be accommodated without impacting on pedestrians, and not in areas of high footfall. The proposed service procedure stated that a 2m width should be provided under normal circumstances to allow two wheelchairs to pass, and that as a minimum requirement 1.5m would be considered to allow a wheelchair and walkers to pass. The 1.2m width would only be used in exceptional circumstances in areas of low footfall and isolated locations and not considered suitable for town centres. The allowance of A boards had been a contentious issue with both traders (who wished to freely advertise in pedestrian areas) and disability groups (who had concerns about obstructing their passage). The issue had also raised vocal comment in the local press.

Page 290

The proposed service procedure ensured compliance with highway law and equality standards, helped control and regulate street scene “sign clutter” and provided a framework which was fair and reasonable to businesses and traders. The proposal was that only one ‘A’ board would be allowed per property regardless of how many businesses were situated within it. Members asked if the County Council licensed the A Boards, and the Assistant Director explained that the council give permission for the boards but they did not require a license. One of the members felt that in circumstances where there was a narrow lane with many premises, the shops should be able to use one board for a number of premises rather than one board each. The Assistant Director confirmed this would be possible. The Chair of South Lakeland Local Committee welcomed the policy but felt that the issue of enforcement might be challenging. With the South Lakeland area the Chamber of Trade was undertaking enforcement, but this had not been tested as there had not been any breaches of the policy yet. The Vice Chair of Allerdale Local Committee said a pilot had been carried out in Keswick and Cockermouth in relation to A Boards, which had been very successful. He suggested that the lessons learned during this pilot should be incorporated into the policy. Members felt that the policy was too detailed and a plain English version should be produced which could then be distributed to all retailers. They also suggested it would be advantageous to produce a media strategy for selling this to the media and the public. The Chair suggested that members support the recommendation that the policy be adopted, but that it would be reviewed in 12 months time to assess how successful it had been. This was AGREED. 61 HIGHWAYS RESTRUCTURE The Leader of the Council was aware that many of the Chair and Vice Chairs were concerned about the current proposals for the restructure of the Highways Service. He felt that member involvement was crucial for service delivery but the structures within the Highways Department were for the officers to decide. It was AGREED that the Chief Executive would organise a meeting for the Leader, Deputy Leader, Chairs and Vice Chairs of the local committees and the Cabinet Member for Economy and Highways to meet with relevant officers as soon as possible (Action: JS)

Page 291

62 DATE & TIME OF NEXT MEETING The next meeting will take place on Monday 29 July 2013 at 10am in County Offices Kendal.

The meeting ended at 12.35 pm

Page 292

Local Committee Forward Plan - Carlisle

LOCAL COMMITTEE:

DATE: THURSDAY 30 MAY 2013

Forward Planning Meeting

Reports to Legal & Finance

Friday 10 May 2013

Final Reports to Democratic Services

Monday 20 May 2013

Chair’s Briefing Meeting

PRESENTATIONS

Subject

Summary of Presentation

Directorate /Organisation

Presenting Lead

National Grid

Lynne Thomas

Environment

REPORTS

Report Name

Summary of Report

Decision/s Required

Lead Officer

Directorate

Appointment of Chair

Lynn Harker

Resources

Appointment of Vice-Chair

Lynn Harker

Resources

Appointments to Outside

Bodies

Lynn Harker

Resources

Finance Update (Draft

Outturn Accounts for

2012/13?)

Tony Chew

Finance

Area Plan Priorities

David Sheard

Chief Executive

Current Programmes of

Delivery

David Sheard

Chief Executive

Agenda Item 21

Page 293

Page 294

This page is intentionally left blank