A Quantitative Investigation of Transformative Learning

16
A Quantitative Investigation of Transformative Learning Scott L. Walker, ScEdD Northwest Vista College San Antonio, TX, USA July 3, 2014, International Journal of Arts and Sciences Conference, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia

Transcript of A Quantitative Investigation of Transformative Learning

A Quantitative Investigation of Transformative Learning

Scott L. Walker, ScEdD Northwest Vista College

San Antonio, TX, USA July 3, 2014, International Journal of Arts and Sciences

Conference, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia

Transformative Learning

Transformation – A shift or change in worldview

Transformative Learning – Process of a learner involved in a transformative experience

Transformative Ed – Planned educational program, experience, intervention, or set of practices

Transformative Learning

Fits into 9 streams of learning theory 1. Cognitive-Rational

2. Depth-Psychological

3. Psychoanalytic

4. Pscyodevelopmental

5. Structural Development

6. Social Emancipatory

7. Cultural-Spiritual

8. Positionality

9. Neurobilogical

Transformative Learning

Narrowed down to 4 streams of learning theory

1. Cognitive-Rational

2. Psychological

3. Structural Development

4. Socio-Emancipatory

TL as Socio-Emancipatory Approach Transformation

– Development of critical consciousness (Friere, hooks); conscientização (conscientization)

– Deeping awareness of socio-cultural awareness

Transformative Learning

– Continued process of action, reflection, dialogue

Transformative Education

– Critical “andragogy,” problem posing, horizontal classroom environment

TL as Cognitive-Rational Approach

Transformation – Shift in perspective of meaning

Transformative Learning – Practice of cognitive dissonance, reflection on one’s

way of thinking, dialogue, and some action based on new ways of thinking

Transformative Education – Promoting critical reflection and discourse on prior

experience/ways of thinking through intentional disorienting dilemmas

Transformative Learning Environment Survey (TLES)

Four scales: (1) disorienting dilemmas, (2) self-reflection, (3) meaning perspective and critical discourse, and (4) changes in behavior

Each scale assessing the students’ perspective and the learning environment

52 items

Response Scale: 1 Never, 2 Seldom, 3 Sometimes, 4 Often, 5 Always

TLES Example Items

Disorienting dilemma

In this class…

Self-perception-…I questioned my way of thinking.

In this class, the instructor…

Env. Perception-…Challenged my way of thinking.

TLES Example Items

Self-Reflection

In this class…

Self-perception-…I questioned my ideas.

In this class, the instructor…

Env. Perception-…Asked me to think about where my ideas came from.

TLES Example Items

Meaning Perspective & Social Discourse

In this class…

Self-perception-…I became aware of the perspectives of others.

In this class, the instructor…

Env. Perception-…made it okay to examine assumptions.

TLES Example Items

Acting

In this class…

Self-perception-…I critically question the evidence provided.

In this class, the instructor…

Env. Perception-…Set up situations where I could express any new viewpoints.

Stu

den

t

1)

Dis

ori

enti

ng

Dile

mm

a

The extent to which students perceived a disorienting dilemma.

Envi

ron

men

t The extent to which the instructor used disorienting dilemmas as a part of instruction.

Stu

den

t

2)

Self

-Ref

lect

ion

The extent to which students critically perceived their subjective perceptions of knowledge.

Envi

ron

me

nt The extent to which the instructor created

opportunities for student critical self-reflection.

Stu

den

t

3)

Mea

nin

g P

ersp

ecti

ve &

C

riti

cal D

isco

urs

e

The extent to which students perceive their meaning perspectives. [“lens through which persons filter & interpret the

world”]

Envi

ron

men

t The extent to which the instructor creates opportunities for critical discourse.

Stu

den

t

4)

Act

ing The extent to which students perceive a

change in their behavior.

Envi

ron

men

t The extent to which the instructor creates an environment for students to demonstrate change in behavior.

Results

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

DDs DDe SRs SRe MPCDs MPCDe ACTs ACTe

TLES Scale Means

DDs DDe SRs SRe MPCDs MPCDe ACTs ACTe

3.4 2.5 3.5 3.6 4.0 4.4 3.6 3.9

Associations all to SAT

Scale Actor M SD r ß

Disorienting Dilemma Student 3.44 1.10 0.17* 0.04* Environment 2.48 1.28 -0.29 -0.08*

Self-Reflection Student 3.51 1.09 0.23* 0.05* Environment 3.65 1.03 0.28* 0.06*

Meaning Perspective & Critical Discourse

Student 3.96 0.88 0.29* 0.05* Environment 4.36 0.83 0.49* 0.38*

Acting Student 3.64 1.00 0.33* 0.10* Environment 3.91 0.93 0.41* 0.16*

Satisfaction 4.34 0.92 Multiple correlation (R) R2

0.59

0.34

*p < 0.01, N=649