A PESTLE analysis of solar home systems in refugee camps ...

30
* = corresponding author details, [email protected] A PESTLE analysis of solar home systems in refugee camps in Rwanda Thomas, P.J.M. 1, * , Sandwell, P. 2, 3 , Williamson, S.J. 1 , Harper, P.W. 1 1. Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Queen's Building, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TR, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Physics, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. 3. Practical Action, The Robbins Building, 25 Albert Street, Rugby, CV21 2SD, United Kingdom Abstract There is a paucity of data on energy access in refugee camps and limited analysis regarding the viability of modern energy technologies such as solar home systems in these contexts. This paper addresses these by presenting an overview of the household and small enterprise electricity access situation in Kigeme, Nyabiheke and Gihembe camps in Rwanda and through the application of a Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal and Environmental (PESTLE) analysis to assess the barriers influencing solar home system provision. Most households and small enterprises currently have limited or no access to electricity and there is significant unmet demand for energy services such as mobile phone charging, lighting, and entertainment in the camps. The analysis suggests that solar home systems can meet these energy needs and identifies important factors in ensuring projects are successful. Projects should be informed by the needs and priorities of end-users and should be aligned with national policies, such as achieving Tier 2 energy access, to garner political support. Where possible, local market systems should be nurtured to normalise paying for energy products and to avoid free distribution. This can support private sector engagement and result in longer system lifetimes through improved maintenance. Energy literacy programmes can also improve awareness of solar home systems and their benefits compared to traditional sources of energy. These findings can inform practitioners on the supporting policy/financial frameworks, design requirements and implementation measures needed to maximise the benefits of future solar home system projects and help achieve electrification targets. Word Count: 7,948 Highlights An overview of access to electricity in three refugee camps in Rwanda. A PESTLE analysis of solar home systems in the refugee camps. Identification and analysis of factors impacting solar home system projects. Recommendations to enable better solar home system project design.

Transcript of A PESTLE analysis of solar home systems in refugee camps ...

*=correspondingauthordetails,[email protected]

A PESTLE analysis of solar home systems in refugee camps in Rwanda

Thomas,P.J.M.1,*,Sandwell,P.2,3,Williamson,S.J.1,Harper,P.W.1

1. FacultyofEngineering,UniversityofBristol,Queen'sBuilding,UniversityWalk,Bristol,BS81TR,UnitedKingdom.

2. DepartmentofPhysics,BlackettLaboratory,ImperialCollegeLondon,PrinceConsortRoad,SouthKensington,London,SW72AZ,UnitedKingdom.

3. PracticalAction,TheRobbinsBuilding,25AlbertStreet,Rugby,CV212SD,UnitedKingdom

Abstract

Thereisapaucityofdataonenergyaccessinrefugeecampsandlimitedanalysisregardingtheviabilityofmodernenergytechnologiessuchassolarhomesystemsinthesecontexts.ThispaperaddressesthesebypresentinganoverviewofthehouseholdandsmallenterpriseelectricityaccesssituationinKigeme,NyabihekeandGihembecampsinRwandaandthroughtheapplicationofaPolitical,Economic,Social,Technological,LegalandEnvironmental(PESTLE)analysistoassessthebarriersinfluencingsolarhomesystemprovision.Mosthouseholdsandsmallenterprisescurrentlyhavelimitedornoaccesstoelectricityandthereissignificantunmetdemandforenergyservicessuchasmobilephonecharging,lighting,andentertainmentinthecamps.Theanalysissuggeststhatsolarhomesystemscanmeettheseenergyneedsandidentifiesimportantfactorsinensuringprojectsaresuccessful.Projectsshouldbeinformedbytheneedsandprioritiesofend-usersandshouldbealignedwithnationalpolicies,suchasachievingTier2energyaccess,togarnerpoliticalsupport.Wherepossible,localmarketsystemsshouldbenurturedtonormalisepayingforenergyproductsandtoavoidfreedistribution.Thiscansupportprivatesectorengagementandresultinlongersystemlifetimesthroughimprovedmaintenance.Energyliteracyprogrammescanalsoimproveawarenessofsolarhomesystemsandtheirbenefitscomparedtotraditionalsourcesofenergy.Thesefindingscaninformpractitionersonthesupportingpolicy/financialframeworks,designrequirementsandimplementationmeasuresneededtomaximisethebenefitsoffuturesolarhomesystemprojectsandhelpachieveelectrificationtargets.

WordCount:7,948

Highlights

• AnoverviewofaccesstoelectricityinthreerefugeecampsinRwanda.• APESTLEanalysisofsolarhomesystemsintherefugeecamps.• Identificationandanalysisoffactorsimpactingsolarhomesystemprojects.• Recommendationstoenablebettersolarhomesystemprojectdesign.

Keywords

EnergyAccess;HumanitarianEnergy;SolarHomeSystems;PESTLEAnalysis;Refugee;Rwanda

Abbreviations

1US$=953RWFCO2-CarbondioxideCRRF-ComprehensiveRefugeeResponseFrameworkEPRSC–EngineeringandPhysicalSciencesResearchCouncilGPA-GlobalPlanofActionforSustainableEnergySolutionsinSituationsofDisplacementLED-light-emittingdiodeMIDIMAR-MinistryofDisasterManagementandRefugeeAffairsMINEMA-MinistryofEmergencyManagementPAYG-Pay-As-You-GoPESTLE-political,economic,social,technical,legalandenvironmentalPV-photovoltaicRE4R-RenewableEnergyforRefugeesRWF–RwandanFrancSAFE-SafeAccesstoFirewoodandAlternativeEnergyinHumanitarianSettingsSDG-SustainableDevelopmentGoalSHS-solarhomesystemsUNHCR-UnitedNationsHighCommissionerforRefugeesVAT-value-addedtaxW–WattWh-WatthourWp-Wattpeak

1.0 Introduction

Existingresearchhasestablishedthatmostrefugeesandthehostcommunitiessurroundingthemcurrentlyrelyonunsustainable,unreliableandunsafeformsofenergy[1–5].Thisisinpartbecauseenergyisnotcurrentlyembeddedwithinthehumanitarianresponsesystem[6–8]andisoftennotprioritised[9,10].Thislackofaccesstoenergyisknowntoexacerbatemultipleissuesinhumanitariancontextsincludingimpactingtheprotection[11],health[12,13]andeducation[14]ofdisplacedpeople.

Toaddressthischallenge,theUnitedNationsHighCommissionerforRefugees(UNHCR)madeacommitmentatthe2019GlobalRefugeeForumthatallrefugeeandhostcommunityhouseholdswillhaveTier2electricityaccessby2030[15].Thismeansthatallhouseholdshaveaccesstoatleast50Wofpoweror200Whperdayofelectricitythatcanprovidelighting,aircirculation,televisionandphonechargingservicesforaminimumof4hoursduringthedayand2hoursintheevening[16].Inordertoachievethisgoal,humanitarianorganisationsneedtosignificantlyincreaseenergyaccesslevelsforatleast20millionpeople1[17]withintenyears.

1Atthetimeofwritingtherewere20.4millionrefugeesunderUNHCR’smandate(excludingPalestinianrefugees).

Enablinghouseholdstoaccesssolarhomesystems(SHS)whichareoftenabletomeetthecriteriaofTier2energyaccess[18–20]isonepossiblesolutiontothischallenge.WhiletherehavebeenSHSprojectsinrefugeecampsinKenya[21,22]andinBurkinaFaso[23],theseprojectshaveoftenhadlimitedsuccessbecauseofissueswithaffordabilityandbecauseinterventionsdidnotconsiderlocalconditionsortheneedsoftheintendedcommunities[24].ThereisalsolimitedresearchevaluatingwhythegrowthindemandforSHSseenelsewhereinRwanda[25]hasnotalsobeenseeninrefugeecampsinthecountry.

TheobjectivesofthispaperaretoaddresstwoofthechallengesthatneedtobeovercometoincreasethediffusionofSHSinthecamps:(1)alackofdataonenergyprovisioninhumanitariansituationswhichisinhibitingtheabilityoforganisationstoprovideenergysolutions[26,27]and(2)theidentificationofpolitical,economic,social,technical,legalandenvironmentalbarriersandenablersthatmustbeaddressedinordertoachievewidespreadadoptionanduseofSHS[25,28–30].Forexample,althoughsomestudieshaveindicatedthatSHSareaviabletechnologyforenablingsocio-economicdevelopmentandalleviatingpoverty[31–33]therearealsoseveralstudiesthatrefutethisclaim[34–36].Properalignmentofthesefactorshasalsobeenidentifiedbyotherresearchers[39]asanessentialcomponentofsuccessfulprojects.WeaddressthischallengebyconductingaPESTLEanalysistoexplorethefactorsinfluencingtheimplementationofSHSinrefugeecampsandtoidentifylessonslearntfrompreviousprojects.ThistypeofanalysishasbeenconductedonarangeofdifferentenergytopicsincludingrenewableenergyinMalawi[38],Indonesia’sfossilfuelindustry[39],andthetidalenergyindustryintheUK[40].However,thisisthefirstpapertopresentaPESTLEanalysisofSHSasawayofprovidingaccesstoelectricityinhumanitariancontexts,andthefirstacademicpapertopresentdataontheenergysituationinKigeme,NyabihekeandGihemberefugeecampsinRwanda.Thisanalysisprovidesafirststepinunderstandingthespecificchallengesassociatedwithprovidingenergyinthesehumanitariancontexts.ThefindingscanbeusedbypractitionersandpolicymakerstoguidethedevelopmentoffutureSHSprojects,andbyresearcherstoidentifyareaswhereadditionaldataoranalysiswouldbeofvalue.

ThisstudyconsiderstheelectricityaccesssituationforhouseholdsandsmallenterprisesinKigeme,NyabihekeandGihemberefugeecamps.Unlikemanysituationsofdisplacement,thesethreecampshavebeenthefocusofrecentenergyaccessassessmentsaspartoftheongoingRenewableEnergyforRefugees(RE4R)projectandthereforeofferatimelyandrelevantcasestudy.Althoughcautionmustbetakenbeforeapplyingthefindingsofthispapertootherrefugeecontexts,theauthorsconsiderthatthesecampsoffersimilaritiestootherprotractedrefugeesituationsintheEastAfricaregionsuchasinTanzania,Burundi,Uganda,Ethiopia,SudanandKenya.Forexample,manyoftherefugeeslivingincampsinruralandremoteareasinthesecountrieshavelowincomesandpooraccesstoelectricity,whilsttheregionissun-richandisexperiencingatransitiontowardsdecentralisedenergysystemssuchasSHS.TheRE4RprojectbuildsonpreviousworkbytheMovingEnergyInitiativethatdescribedtheenergysituationinDadaabrefugeecampinKenya[22]andGoudouborefugeecampinBurkinaFaso[41]andwhichoffertwofurthercasesforcomparison.

ThefollowingsectionsprovideabriefoverviewofSHS,followedbyadescriptionoftheresearchmethodology.Theexistingenergysituationinthecamps,includingaccesstoenergyinhouseholdsandenterprises,isthenprovided.APESTLEanalysisispresentedwhichevaluatestheopportunitiesandchallengesfacingtheprovisionofSHSinthecamps,followedbyadiscussionoftheissues.Thefinalsectionspresentsomeofthelimitationsassociatedwiththeresearch,futureresearchideasandconcludingremarks.

1.1 Solar Home Systems

Thefallingcostsofphotovoltaic(PV)panels,batteriesandlight-emittingdiode(LED)bulbshavehelpedSHSemergeasacost-effectivetechnologyforprovidingelectricitytolow-demandcustomersinoff-gridlocations[25,28,42–44].SHScanprovidehouseholdswithagreaterrangeandqualityofservicesthanthoseavailableviasmaller-scaletechnologies,suchassolarlanterns,butwithasmalleroverallinfrastructurecommitmentthaninstallinglarger-scaleoptionssuchasaminigrid.AtypicalSHS(Figure1)comprisesa10to100WpPVpanel,arechargeablebattery,appliancesandassociatedequipmentsuchaswiring,switches,achargecontrollerandcommunicationequipmentthatarenotfullyshowninFigure1.DependingonthesizeofthesystemarangeofappliancesincludingLEDlights,fans,televisions,andradioscanbeconnected[45–47].MostSHScanprovideTier2accesstoelectricityservicesandstate-of-the-artsystemscanreachTier3[48–50].

Figure1:AsimplifiedschematicshowingthemaincomponentsofatypicalSHS(authors’own).

Itisimportanttonotethatwhilethemulti-tierframeworkhasbeencreditedforexpandingnarrowmetricsdefiningenergyaccess[51]therehasbeensomecriticismthatthereisstilltoomuchfocusonsystemattributessuchasWattpeakorWatt-hoursofsystemsratherthanontheservicesthesesystemsoffer[52].WefocusonTier22forconsistencywiththeUNHCREnergyChallengeandRwandanGovernmentguidelines.However,wesupportanalysisbyotherresearchthatsuggestsTier32orhighershouldbethelong-termaspiration[51].

2Fulldetailsofdifferencesbetweeneachtierareavailablein[16].

2.0 Research Methodology

Thispaperpresentsasummary3oftheexistingenergysituationinKigeme,GihembeandNyabihekerefugeecampsinRwandathatwasinvestigatedbyPracticalActionaspartoftheRE4Rprojectusingquantitativeandqualitativeapproaches.Thequantitativeassessmentaimedtoprovidenumericalevidencedescribingthedemographicsofthecampresidents,theircurrentaccesstoenergy,andtheirenergyneedsandpriorities.Thesurveysfocusedonenergyuseinhouseholdsanddomesticsettings(n.623;211householdsinGihembe,202inKigeme,210inNyabiheke),andforenterprisesandbusinesses(n.155;64,34,and37enterprisesrespectively).BuildingonsimilarstudiesbyPracticalAction[22,41,53,54],andwithinputsfromboththeUNHCRRwandaandGenevateamsandotherpartners,theassessmentmethodologywasdevelopedandfieldtestedbyRE4RstaffbeforebeingconductedinthecampsbytrainedenumeratorsinMarchandApril2018viaone-to-oneinterviewsofpeoplelivingandworkinginthecamps.

ThesurveysweretranslatedfromEnglishtoKinyarwanda,conductedinthelatterasthelanguageisspokenwidelyinthecamps,andresponseswererecordedelectronicallyonatabletinEnglishornumerically,asapplicable.Refugeeenumeratorsselectedtoconductthesurveyreceivedadailystipendandparticipatedinatwo-daytrainingworkshopbeforedatacollectioncommenced.EnumeratorsweresupervisedthroughoutthedatacollectionprocessbyfieldstafffromPracticalActionandUNHCRRwanda.Respondentsforthequantitativesurveywereselectedatrandomfromwithinpredeterminedgeographicalareastoformarepresentativesampleofthecampasawhole,withafulldescriptionofthesurveyingmethodologygivenin[55].

QualitativedatawasalsocollectedfromawiderangeofenergyusersviaunstructuredinterviewsconductedbytworesearchersfromPracticalActionwhoweresupportedbycamp-basedstaff.Theseinterviewsfocusedonthelivedexperienceofrefugeecommunities,followingaprocesssimilarto[56],andprovideadditionaldepthanddetailthatisnotreflectedinquantitativedatacollectiontechniques.DatacollectionwascompletedinMay2018andwasusedtodesignimplementationplansforfourrenewableenergyinterventionsinthethreecamps[55].

APESTLEanalysisisconductedtoidentifyfactorsthatmaybeinfluencingtheadoptionofSHSinthecamps.PESTLEanalysisisananalyticaltoolforevaluatingtheimpactofexistingandfutureexternalfactorsonasystemortechnologywhilealsoevaluatingtheimpactofthesystemortechnologyinthecontextwhereitisimplemented[57,58].Thismethodisparticularlyusefulforexploringissuesthataremainlyqualitativeinnatureandforanalysingproblemsholistically.Inthecontextofthispaper,thePESTLEanalysisisfocusedonthefactorsinfluencingthediffusionofSHSamonghouseholdsandsmallenterprisesinthecampsinRwanda.Thefactorsidentifiedarewiderangingandincludelocal,national,andinternationalissues.AwiderangeofstakeholdersinterestedinSHSdeploymentareconsideredincludingrefugeeslivinginthecamps,thehostcommunitieslivingnearby,humanitarianandgovernmentagencies,donors,andprivatesectorcompanies.Thefindingsoftheanalysiscanbeusedtoimprovefutureprojectsandtoidentifyareasthatrequirefurtherinvestigation.

3FulldetailsoftheRE4Rassessmentprocessandfindingsareavailablein[55].

Theanalysisdrawsonacademicandgreyliteraturediscussingenergyaccessandhumanitarianinterventionsandtheexperienceoftheauthorstoinformtheanalysis.TheanalysisalsodrawsonunpublishedliteraturefromtheRE4RprojectsuchasnotesfromworkshopsandprogrammemeetingswhichincludeparticipantsfromawiderangeoforganisationsinvolvedintheRE4RprojectincludingPracticalAction,UNHCR,theIKEAFoundation(theprojectdonor)andtheRwandanMinistryofEmergencyManagement(MINEMA),formerlyknownastheMinistryofDisasterManagementandRefugeeAffairs(MIDIMAR).

Toensurevalidity,thefindingsofthepaperhavebeendiscussedwithmembersoftheRE4RprojectincludingPracticalActionstaffsuchasthefieldcoordinatorsbasedineachofthecamps,theproject’stechnicaladviser,theprojectmanagerandthemonitoring,evaluationandlearningadvisor.Furthermoreexpertsinthefieldhavebeenconsulted,suchasmembersoftheGPA,andcomparisonsmadebetweenthedatacollectedaspartofthisstudyandotherprojectssuchas[22,41].TheleadandsecondauthorsbothsatontheRE4RTechnicalWorkingGroupwhichmetquarterlythroughouttheprojectandwereparticipantsindecision-makingworkshopsandregularprojectreviews.Theseactivitieswillhelptomitigatetheimpactofanyemergentdiscrepanciesbetweenthepointatwhichkeydataweregathered,forexamplethesurveydata,andthecontinuallyevolvingsituationsinthecamps.

3.0 Existing Energy Situation

3.1 Kigeme, Nyabiheke and Gihembe Camps

InthispaperweconsiderthreeofthesixrefugeecampsoperatinginRwanda.ThecampshostrefugeespredominantlyfromNorthKivuandSouthKivuprovincesoftheDemocraticRepublicoftheCongo,havesimilarlevelsofhouseholdincomeandlevelsofemployment.AsummaryoftheseisgiveninTable1andFigure2showstheapproximatelocationofthecampsandKigali,thecapitalcityofRwanda.

Table1:Overviewofthelocations,sizeandeconomiesofthethreecamps.Datafrom[55],[59]and[60].

Camp Gihembe Kigeme NyabihekeHouseholds 2,910 3,998 2,787People 12,391 22,950 14,289Averagenumberofpeopleperhousehold 4 6 5Totalhouseholdmonthlyincome(RWF) 83,211 43,113 23,782Totalhouseholdmonthlyincome(US$) 87.31 45.24 24.95Householdswithwageearnerinlast12months(%) 34 42 47Non-farmbusinesses(%ofallbusinesses) 8 13 17

Figure2:MapofRwandashowingthelocationsofGihembe(blue),Nyabiheke(red)andKigeme(green)refugeecampsandKigalithecapitalcityofRwanda(yellowstar)[Source:55].

Thesecampswerethefocusofapreviousinvestigationby[60]thatinvestigatedtheeconomiclifeandemploymentofrefugeesresidentinthecamps;althoughthisstudydidnotfocusonenergyaccess,someofthedatagatheredisrelevanttoassessingthepotentialeconomicviabilityofSHSforhouseholds.Householdincome(includingdirectaid,wagesandremittances),potentiallyindicativeoftheabilitytopayforaSHS,washighestinGihembe.KigemeandNyabiheke,meanwhile,hadhigherproportionsofthebusinessesinthecampsoperatingoutsideoftheagriculturalsector,suchasinretail,tradeandfoodservice,whichwouldlikelyhavegreateruseforaSHS.

Allthreecampsnowuseacashandvoucherprogrammeinlieuofdirectassistanceandfooddistribution,whichatthetimeofthatstudywasonlyoperatinginGihembe.Theseprogrammesaimtodevelopthefinancialindependenceofrefugeehouseholdsbyofferinggreaterautonomyoverpurchasingdecisionswhilealsohelpingtofacilitategreaterintegrationbetweentherefugeeandlocalhostcommunitypopulations,includingaccesstoelectricityproductsandservices.

3.2 Access to electricity for households

Thereisnooverallresponsibilityamongstthecampauthoritiesfortheprovisionofenergyforlighting,althoughanumberofdistributionprogrammeshavehadalimitedeffectonincreasingaccess.Atthattimehouseholdshadverylimitedaccesstobothelectricityandenergyforcooking,withmostrespondentsreportingaccesstoonlythemostbasicformsoftechnologiesandfuels.

AsshowninFigure3,whichdisplaysthelightingsourcesusedbyhouseholdsinthepast12months,mosthouseholdsreliedonacombinationoflow-tierlightingtechnologies–suchascandles,lightsonmobilephonesandimprovisedbatterytorches–tomeettheirlightingneeds.Whenaskedaboutthehousehold’smainsourceoflighting,acrossthethreecamps,only21%ofhouseholdsreportedrelyingprimarilyonsolarlanternsand16%onSHSastheirmainsourceoflight.AccesstoaSHS,and

correspondinglyaccesstoTier2electricityservicesorhigher,variedbetweenthethreecamps:inGihembethiswasashighasaroundoneinthreehouseholds,whereasinKigemeitwaslowerthanonehouseholdinten.Theauthorsalsoidentifiedthataccesstohighertiertechnologiesresultedingreaterhoursoflightingintheevening:householdswithTier0technologiesreceivedonaverage2.6hoursperdayoflight,thosewithsolarlanterns(assumedtobeTier1)received3.3hoursperday,whilstSHS(Tier2)offered4.0hoursperday.

Figure3:Lightingsourcesusedbyhouseholdsinthepast12months.Householdscouldreportasmanyofthesourcesthatwererelevanttothem.DatafromtheRE4Rproject.

Thedeliverymodelusedtoprovidetheenergytechnologyhadanimpactonitslong-termeffectiveness[55].Forexample,campresidentswhoreceivedsolarproductsasdonationsfromcampauthoritiesorotherorganisationsweremorelikelytoreportissueswiththem,suchasbreakagesorthefts.ThiswasparticularlyprevalentinKigeme,where57%ofsolarlanternswerereceivedasdonationsandmorethanhalfofthoselanternssufferedproblems.Incontrast,householdsthatpaidforSHSfromshopsinsideorretailersoutsideofthecamps,suchasBBOXX,ZolaandIgnite,reportedfewerissues:97%ofSHSwereacquiredintheseways,butonlybetween8%(inGihembe)and18%(inKigeme)sufferedissues.Anecdotally,however,severalrespondentsdescribedaperceivedlackofcustomersupportfromretailers,potentiallycausedbycompaniesbeingunsureoftheauthorisationsorpermitsnecessarytoenterthecampstofixbrokenproducts.

CampresidentswithoutSHSreportedspendingonnon-renewablesourcesoflightingsuchascandlesandbatteriesand,whilsttherewasawiderangeorspendingpracticesreported,medianexpenditurewas500RWF(US$0.53)andmeanexpenditurewas1,000RWF(US$1.05)permonth.Connectingtothenationalgridnetwork,whichwasusedbycampauthoritiestovaryingdegreesinallthreecampsandusedbythelocalhostcommunities,wasnotpermittedforrefugeehouseholdseveniftheywereabletosaveenoughtopayfortheinitialconnectionfee.Anecdotallythiswasforsafetypurposesandbecausethecampswerenotpermanentsettlements.

ByanalysingtheprevalenceofSHSinthecamps,[61]usedthedatafromtheRE4Rprojecttoestimatethemarketsizeofpotentialnewcustomersifenoughinterventionswereintroduced.Theanalysisfoundthatrespondentsmostvaluedthebenefitselectriclightingwouldbringforworkingathome(suchasforabusiness,doingchoresorstudying)withahighimportanceforchargingmobilephones,bothofwhicharepromotedsellingpointsofSHS.ByconsideringthemonthlytariffsbeingchargedbytwoSHScompanies(BBOXXandBelecom)supportedaspartoftheRE4Rproject,[61]alsoestimatedthatthenumberofhouseholdsthatwouldpurchaseasystematthepriceofferedwouldbebetween1,400RWFand2,400RWF.Theseestimates,however,couldvarysignificantlydependentonactivitiesthataffecthouseholdwillingnesstopay,suchasawarenessraisingcampaignsandgreateraccesstoretailoutletsinorneartothecamps.Itisalsoworthnotingthatdisparitiesoftenexistbetweendemandpredictionsandrealuptakebecauseofdifferencesbetweenwillingnessandabilitytopay[28].

3.3 Access to electricity for enterprises

Therewereavarietyofenterprisesinthethreecampssuchasretailshops,phonechargingproviders,foodshops,restaurants,bars,tailorsandhairdressers.OveralllevelsofelectricityaccesswerelowandmostenterprisesreliedonTier0or1technologies(58%overall)withonlyaminorityhavingaccesstoSHSenablingTier2access(27%)orhigherfromconnectionstominigridusedtopowercampoperations(15%)[55].Mostenterprises,especiallysmallshopsandthoseofferingphone-chargingservices,operatedfromwithinrespondenthomeswhilstonly5%hadadedicatedbuilding.Thissuggeststhatthesameelectricityservicescouldbenefitbothdomesticandcommercialpurposesinhabitingthesamephysicalspace.Relativelybasicelectricityservices,suchaslighting,phonechargingandtelevisions,werethemostfrequentlydesiredamongstbusinesses,indicatingasignificantpotentialcustomerbaseforSHSthatcommonlyprovidetheseservices.Therewaslessdesireforotherusesofenergysuchasheatingandcooling,potentiallyduetoalackoftechnologiesavailableinthecampsthatwouldsupplythese.

4.0 PESTLE Analysis

AlthoughSHSofferapotentialsolutionforimprovingelectricityaccesslevelsamonghouseholdsandsmallenterprisesinthecamps,withasmallminorityalreadybenefitingfromaccesstothem,therearecurrentlybarrierspreventingtheirwidespreaddiffusion.ThefollowingsectionspresentthePESTLEanalysisconductedaspartofthisresearchtobreakdownandevaluatethevariousfactorsinfluencingthediffusionofsystems.Insomesections,suchassections4.5and4.6,therewasverylimitedinformationaboutSHSprovisionspecificallyrelatedtohumanitariancontexts.Wehavedrawnmorewidelyonliteraturefromothercontextsandconsultedwithexpertsinthefieldtoensurevalidity.

4.1 Political

Policyandgovernancearecentraltothesustainabilityorenergyinterventions[37,62]andargumentssuggestingthatthepoliticalenvironmentneedstochangeinordertoimproveaccesstoenergyforrefugeeshaveexistedsince2015[2,63].However,therehavebeenseveralpolicydevelopmentssincethen.Forexample,theSustainableEnergyforAllinitiativeaimstoensuresustainableenergyforallby2030[64]andtrackingenergyaccesslevelsamongdisplacedpeoplewasincludedintheGlobalTrackingFrameworkforthefirsttimein2017[65].In2015theUnitedNationsalsoagreedon17SustainableDevelopmentGoals(SDGs),includingSDG7whichaimsto“ensureaccesstoaffordable,reliable,

sustainableandmodernenergyforall”[66]and,anindicatoronrefugeeswasexplicitlyincludedafterareviewin2019[67].Whilethesepoliticalambitionshelpdemonstratetheimportanceofenergyatahighlevel,afailuretointegrateenergyprovisionintohumanitariancoordinationmechanismssuchastheClusterSystem[7,68,69]andtheRefugeeCoordinationModel[70]hasledtogapsinresponse.Tohelpaddressthis,UNHCRlauncheditsGlobalStrategyforSustainableEnergyandcreatedacleanenergychallengeattheendof2019[15,71].Twocoordinatingbodies,thetaskforceonSafeAccesstoFirewoodandAlternativeEnergyinHumanitarianSettings(SAFE)andtheGlobalPlanofActionforSustainableEnergySolutionsinSituationsofDisplacement(GPA)[8,26],havealsobeenestablishedtosupporttheprovisionofenergyinhumanitariansettings.

ProvidingaccesstoelectricityisalsoincreasinglyapriorityfornationalgovernmentsandenergypoliciescanbeakeydriverofSHSadoption[72,73].Investmentinenergyprovisioncanbeenabledwherethereisgovernmentsupportforit[74]orcanbeamajorbarriertothediffusionwhenthereisalackofit[75,76],orwhenthereissupportforothermeansofelectrificationsuchasthenationalgrid.AlthoughthisissuehasnotbeenidentifiedinRwanda,insomecountries,suchasGhanaandMalawi,politicianshavepromisedoff-gridcommunitiesaccesstoelectricityduringpoliticalcampaigns[28,38,77].Thiscanleadtoanunwillingnesstoadoptoff-gridtechnology[78,79],althoughdomesticgridconnectionsareunlikelyinmanyhumanitariansettings,includinginRwanda.

Theadministrationofrefugeecampsistypicallyhighlyregulatedandtheprocessofworkingincamps,particularlyforprivatecompaniesandexternalorganisationsisoftenchallenging[80].Thehostgovernment’sapproachtorefugeesimpactsthecapacityofagenciestoproviderefugeeswithaccesstoenergy[12]whichcanbepoliticallyunpopular[81].Inpart,thechallengesofimprovingenergyaccessforlocalpopulationshavediscouragedgovernmentsfromprioritisingenergyaccessforrefugees[21].Thedeliveryofenergycanalsobehamperedbythewillingnessofhostgovernmentstosupportlong-terminterventions[82,83].Furthermore,byengagingwiththehostcountrygovernmentandensuringinterventionsalignwithexistingpolicies,forexample,ruralelectrificationplansandenvironmentalcommitments,canhelptoavoidnegativedisruptionandunintendedconsequences[74,84].Theinclusionofthelocalhostcommunitiesinenergyprogrammescanhelpaddressthischallenge[21].

Rwandahasrelativelyprogressivepoliciestowardsbothenergyaccessandrefugeeinclusion.TheRwandanGovernmenthasrecognisedtheimportanceofenergyaccessinseveralpoliciesincludingitsEconomicDevelopmentandPovertyReductionStrategyII[85],Vision2020framework[86]andNationalStrategyforTransformation[87].TheRuralElectrificationStrategyalsoincludesSHSasawayofprovidingaccesstoelectricity[88],usingTier2asaminimumstandardsimilartothecommitmentofUNHCR,andtheGovernmenthassupportedprivateSHSbusinessestoestablishandgrowtheiroperationsinRwanda[25].Energyprovisionfordisplacedpeople,meanwhile,issupportedbytheGovernmentsigninguptotheComprehensiveRefugeeResponseFramework(CRRF)inFebruary2018whichaffordsrefugeeswithprogressivelegalandeconomicrightsandaimsforbetterinclusionofrefugeesinRwandanpoliciesandprogrammes[89,90].Alignmentsbetweenhumanitarianenergyprogrammesandtheseexistingpolicyinitiatives,forexamplesharingthegoalofTier2access,canhelpensureadoptionofsystems.

4.2 Economic

Fundingforenergyhasnothistoricallybeenapriorityfordonorsandhumanitarianagenciesareusuallyunabletoprovidehouseholdenergytechnologies[83,91]asaresult.SomesolarlanternshavebeenprovidedinthethreecampsbutthediffusionofSHShasmostlybeenmarket-led.Supportedbyresearchthathasestablishedthatfreelydistributingsimilartechnologiesreducesdiffusionamongstusersinareaswheremarket-baseddeliveryisbeingimplemented[21,23],somehumanitarianactorsarenowarguingthatfreedistributionofproductsshouldbeavoidedinallbutemergencysituations[92–94]becauseofthenegativeimpactsithasonlocalmarketsystems[80,95].

ThedeliveryofSHSthroughmarket-basedmodelshassignificantchallengesthatneedtobeaddressed.Forexample,thehighcostofpurchasingaSHSoutrightisabarrieridentifiedinseveralstudies[20,32]:althoughsystemcostscanvarybetweencountries[76].InRwanda,a50WpSHSisavailabletopurchaseinmarketsforaround250,000RWF(US$262)[96]butthisisasignificantproportionofhouseholdincometopayinasingleinstallment.ExistingSHSprojecthavesometimesfailedtoreachthepoorestmembersofsocietyandaretypicallypurchasedbyhigher-incomehouseholds[92,97,98].Pay-As-You-Go(PAYG)hasemergedasawaytoovercomethislimitedpurchasingcapacityandforlow-incomehouseholdstospreadthecostsofasystemmoreflexiblyandbettertakeaccountoffluctuatingprioritiesandincome[20,92].ForexamplethecostofaBBOXXsystemwithtwolightsandmobilephonechargingisaround6,000RWF(US$6)permonthinthecamp[25],subsidisedbytheRE4Rprojectby40%,farlowerthanthecosttopurchaseasimilarsystemoutrightbutcomparablewhenconsideringthethree-yearrepaymentperiod.However,accesstofinanceforconsumersremainsasignificantbarriertothediffusionofSHSidentifiedinseveralcountries[99–101],whichaffectstheabilityofhouseholdstopurchaseasystemandlimitsSHSprovidersfromscalingtheirbusinesses.AttemptsweremadetoaddressthisaspartoftheRE4Rproject,forexample,thecreationofarevolvingfund[102]whichprovidesaccesstomicroloanswhichhouseholdscanusetopurchaseaSHS.Theintroductionofcash-basedtransfers[103]whererefugeesreceivecashandmakethedecisionaboutwhattheyneedhasbeenanenablingfactorinthecampsbysettinganexpectationthatpaymentshouldbemadeforproductsorserviceswhichsupportsthePAYGmodel[92].

DespiteinnovativedeliverymodelsandsubsidiesinthecaseoftheRE4Rproject,thesepaymentsstillrepresentasignificantexpenditureforlowincomehouseholdsand,insomecases,SHShavebeenpaidforbydivertingfundsfromotherneeds[104].AcquiringaSHSviaPAYGrequiresregularmonthlypaymentsandrepresentsalong-termfinancialcommitmentcomparedtotraditionalenergysourceswhichcanbepurchasedornotdependingonincomeconstraints[104,105]andsomaynotbecompatiblewithvariableincomesofmanyrefugeehouseholds.ThisalsopresentsachallengeforSHSproviders,whoarereliantonconsistentincomestreams[92].Tomitigatethisrisksomesystemsareabletoremotelylockwhichcanreducethefrequencyoflateandmissedpayments[81,106].Forrefugeehouseholdswithmorevariableincomesthismaymeanthat,despitehavingaSHSintheirhome,theiraccesstoimprovedelectricityservicesremainslimited.

ThemajorityofstudiesonthetopicreportthatSHScanhelptoimprovehouseholdincomesprimarilythroughenablingworktotakeplaceafterdark[107,108];giventhatmanyenterprisesinthecampsarelocatedinhouseholds,thiswouldlikelyalsobethecaseincamps.Somehouseholdsalsogenerateincomethroughchargingmobilephones[25]althoughthisopportunitymaybediminishedifSHSareadoptedbymosthouseholds.However,householdsthatdoownaSHScansavemoneyandtimethat

theypreviouslywouldhavespentonenergyservicessuchasmobilephonechargingandtraditionalsourcesoflighting[25,105,109],whichisalsocommonplaceinthecamps.ItisworthnotingthatthereareasimilarnumberofstudiesthatcontradictthesefindingandsuggestthepotentialSHScanhaveonincomegenerationandpovertyreductionislowbecauseincreasedoperatinghoursenabledbyimprovedaccesstolightinghasalimitedimpactonincome[96,104,105,110].

4.3 Social

SHSneedtomeettheneedsofusersandbeadaptedtothecontextsinwhichtheyoperatetoensureacceptanceanddiffusion[38,84,104,111–114].However,identifyingwhatpeoplewantorneedcanbechallengingbecause,insomecases,recipientstellprovidersthattheywantcertaintechnologiesbecausetheythinkthatiswhattheywanttohearandnotbecauseitnecessarilyreflectstheirtruepriorities[115].Projectshavealsofailedinthepastbecauseusershavealimitedchoiceofsystemwhichdonotmeettheirneeds[75,116]andthereareexamplesinhumanitariancontextsofenergyproductsbeingunusedorre-sold[94].Asaresult,projectsshouldconsiderofferingarangeofsystemsorprovidesystemsthatareflexible[28,117]sothatconsumershavechoice.However,itisworthnotingthatofferingonesystemcanhelpreducecosts[76]whichisanimportantconsiderationinhumanitariancontextswherefundingislimited[2].

Energyplaysahugepartintheeverydaylivesofdisplacedcommunities[118,119]andSHShavetheabilitytoimprovehouseholdlivingstandards[75].Refugeeshavereportedthataccesstoelectricityhasimprovedtheirchildren’sabilitytostudy[12,14,120]andlightingenablespeopletomovearoundcampsatnightandincreasesoperatinghoursforenterprises[12,121].InRwanda,theRE4RsurveysfoundthatSHSprovided90minutesmorelightingperdaycomparedtotraditionalsources[45].However,itisworthnotingthatwhileanincreaseinlightinghourscanincreasestudyandoperatinghours,itdoesnotnecessarilyleadtoincreasedincomesoranimprovementineducationalattainment[31,110].SHScanalsoenablepeopletoengageinsocialactivitiesafterdark[75,76,104,113]andimproveaccesstoinformationthroughradioandtelevisions,whichcanhelppeoplemonitorthesituationintheirhomecountry,andisawidelycitedpositiveimpactoflargerSHS[75,76,104,105,109,110,122].However,insomecases,householdscontinueusingtraditionallightingtechnologiestoconservepowerfortelevisionviewing[123]whichcannegatetheexpectedbenefitsofelectriclighting.

TherearealsohealthandsafetybenefitsassociatedwithSHS,forexampleimprovementsinindoorairqualityandareductioninthelikelihoodorburnsandfires[13,32,75,104,124–128].Althoughlightingisnotapanaceaforprotectionchallengesinrefugeecamps,itcanimprovepeople’sperceptionofsafety[11,12,120,129].However,therearesomenegativeimpactssuchassocialexclusionandindebtednessamonggroupswhoareunableorstruggletoaffordSHS[75,105].Vandalismandtheftofsystemscanalsobeaprobleminsomehumanitariancontexts[31,115].

OnepotentialbarriertothediffusionofsystemsisthatlevelsofeducationandawarenessaboutrenewableenergyremainslowamongpotentialconsumersofSHS[76,130].End-usersmaybeunawarethatovertime,SHSmaybecomparablewithwhattheyarecurrentlyspendingonenergy[92].UserscanalsohaveunrealisticexpectationsaboutwhataSHScanachieveandhavemisunderstandingsabouthowtousethetechnologyorbeunawareofthepotentialbenefits[92,109,115,131].Asaresult,capacitybuildingoflocalcommunitiesiswidelycitedtobeanimportantcomponentofprogramsuccess

[76,114,116,132].Alackoffundingtoprovidethis[76]andadvertisingthatdoesn’tillustratethelimitationsofSHS[133]hasexacerbatedthischallenge.

4.4 Technological

ThelimitedcapacityofSHStopowerproductiveandthermalusesisoneofthemainreasonstheyareunabletoreachbeyondTier3[31,134,135]andthisisoneofthereasonswhyusersoftenhaveapreferenceforagridconnection[77].However,gridconnectionsareoftenimpractical,prohibitivelyexpensiveandcanfailtodeliverthepromisedeconomicdevelopment[81,105,135–137].Furthermoretheorganic,unplannednatureofinformalsettlementsmakesthemparticularlychallengingandexpensivecontextsinwhichtoretrofitconventionalinfrastructures[81].InRwanda,theGovernmentisreluctanttoconnectrefugeehouseholdstothegridortotheminigridsthatsupplypowertoinstitutionalfacilitiesinthecamps.ThedeploymentofSHSiscomparativelyflexibleastheycanbeinstalledonindividualhouseholds,whichplacesthematanadvantagecomparedtoothertypesoflarger-scalesystems.

PreviousresearchhasidentifiedthattheperformanceofSHShasbeenreducedbecauseofshadingorbecausesolarpanelshadnotbeencleaned[104].Thisisanimportantissuebecauseimproperuseaffectstheeconomicsandsustainabilityofthesystem[138].Thishighlightstheneedforpropermaintenance;however,accordingto[116]previousprogrammeshaveunderestimatedtheneedforrepairandmaintenance.Asaresult,mostSHSarepoorlymaintainedbytheusers[116,139],aproblemexacerbatedbyalackofusertraining[115,116,140].Poormaintenancecanlimitratesofadoption[114,141]andpreviousresearchsuggestthathouseholdshavenotbeensatisfiedwiththemaintenanceservicesprovidedbysuppliers[109,142].Toaddressthischallenge,somemodernsystemscanberemotelymonitoredandadjustedtoensurebetterperformanceandidentifymaintenanceissues[81,106].However,preliminaryfindingsfromtheRE4RprojectindicatethatthecapacityoftheSHSsupplierstodealwithmaintenanceissueshasbeenhigherwherethereisapermanentpresenceinthecamps.

Tier2SHShavethecapacitytodeliverthethreemostimportantenergyneedsidentifiedbyrefugeehouseholdsintheRE4Rsurvey(mobilecharging,lightingandentertainmentsuchasviaradiosandtelevision)[55]andcanimprovetheenergysituationincomparisontoexistingenergybasicsources.Forlighting,theaveragelightoutputfromaSHSisabout44lumensperbulb,comparedto12lumensforcandlelightand25lumensforkerosenelamps[75]andissignificantlysafer.Providingtheadditionalserviceofmobilechargingwithinthehouseholdcanincreaseconvenienceandhelptosavetimeandexpenditureonmobilephonecharging.Previousprojectevaluationsinnon-refugeesettingsinRwandasuggestweeklysavingsof200RWF(US$0.21)perphone[97],andtheRE4Rassessmentsimilarlyidentifiedanaverageweeklyexpenditureonphonechargingamonghouseholdsof150-300RWF(US$0.16-0.32)[55],whichcouldpotentiallybemitigated.Finally,morepowerfulSHScanenableaccesstoradiosandtelevisionbut,asnotedearlier,thesearetypicallymoreexpensiveandmaybeoutofreachofmanyhouseholdsevenifsubsidised.Therefore,abalanceneedstobeachievedbetweenthecostofthesystemandtheservicesitcanprovide.Whileitisnotwithinthescopetothispapertofullyassesstheimpactoftechnologydevelopment,itisworthnotingthatthecomponentsusedinSHSareprojectedtoimproveoverthecomingyearswhichcanhelpimprovethecapabilityandperformanceofSHS.Forexample,analysisby[141and142]suggestsimprovementsinbatteryandsolartechnologyas

wellasreductionsincost.Therehasalsobeenanincreaseintherangeoflow-powerappliancesalongsideimprovementsinefficiencyandreductionsincosts[145].

4.5 Legal

Overall,thereisverylimitedliteratureonthenexusbetweenthelawandenergyaccessinhumanitariansettings.Mostnationalconstitutionsandlawsinsub-SaharanAfricadonotyetrecognisetherightofaccesstoenergy[146]andsomeauthorsarguethatthisneedstohappeninordertoachieveuniversalaccess[81].ThisappliestoRwandainthatithasmultiplepolicesandtargets(seesection4.1),butnolawsonenergyprovisionorrightstoaccessforrefugeesorthehostcommunity.Formalisingthese,inparticularregardingtheinclusionofdisplacedpeople,wouldhelptointegraterefugeesintohostcountryelectricityprovision.Atpresenttheabilitytomakeaconnectiontoanexistingelectricitysupplyeitherillegallyorinformallycanbeaproblem[147]andpowerthefthasbeenreportedinotherhumanitariansettings[2,3],althoughthishasnotbeenreportedinRwanda.Displacedpeoplebeingaffordedtherighttoworkandpermissiontomoveoutsidethecampcanalsoenableaccesstoenergyinhumanitariansettings[4].Theserightscanhelprefugeesbecomeself-reliant,rebuildtheirlives,securetheirdignityandallowthemtocontributetotheirhostcommunity[148].However,therehavebeennostudiesthatspecificallyinvestigatehowrightstoworkorfreedomofmovementfordisplacedcommunitiesimpactstheirabilitytoaccessenergyviaanymeans.

EvidencefromthedevelopmentliteraturesuggeststhatclarityintermsoftaxationandimportdutiescanalsohelpsupportSHSdiffusionbysimplifyingtheprocessforSHSsuppliersanddistributors.Althoughevidenceforthehumanitariansectorisnotavailable,someresearchhascriticisedtheRwandanGovernmentforalackofclarityonvalue-addedtax(VAT)andtariffs[149].However,alsoitrecognisesthattheRwandanGovernmenthasadoptedprogressivetaxpoliciesthatenableSHSsalesincludingexemptingsolarproductsfromimportdutiesandVAT[150].Whilesparepartsandaccessories,includingappliances,areexemptforVATtheyarenotexemptfromimportduties[150].

PreviousstudieshavealsoidentifiedthatpoorqualitySHSsoldwithoutwarrantiescanhaveanegativeimpactonthewidermarketandconsumertrustinsystems[29,106].AlthoughexistingresearchhasestablishedthatthequalityofproductsinRwandawasrelativelyhigh[149],theRwandanGovernmentmandatedin2018thatallimportedSHSareLightingGlobalcertified4toensurethequalityofproductsavailabletoconsumers[149,150].TheGovernmentalsorequiresthatsystemcomponentssuchaslights,solarpanelsandbatteriesarelabeledandincludecertaininformationsuchastechnicalspecifications[150].AlthoughthecapacityoftheStandardsBoardtoimplementregulationshasbeencriticised[149],thisrepresentsanimportantstepinensuringgoodqualityproductsareavailabletohouseholds.However,accordingtosomeauthors,thelawsneedstogofurtherindealingwithsubstandardsystemstoprotectconsumers[151].Thereislimiteddocumentedevidenceregardingwhetherthesefindingsapplyinhumanitariancontexts,althoughanecdotalevidencesuggeststhatpoorqualityproductsareamajorchallenge,andsoeffortshavebeenmadetoensureminimumstandardsinhumanitariansettingsforaspectssuchashouseholdlighting[i.e.152].

4FurtherinformationontheLightingGlobalstandardsareavailablein[182].

4.6 Environmental

ThereisalackofevidenceregardingtheimpactofenvironmentalfactorsontheprovisionofSHSinhumanitariancontexts.Asaresult,thissectiondrawsonliteraturefromothercontexts.Forexample,evidencesuggeststhatinmanycontextstheinfrastructurerequiredtoprovideSHSincludingtransportandtelecommunicationnetworksisoftenlackingwhichcanincreasecostsanddeliverytimesofSHS[99,115,153].AlthoughroadsbetweenmajortownsaregenerallygoodinRwanda[154],roadstoremotetownsandvillagesareoftenunpavedandcanbecomeimpassableintherainyseason[155].Sincerefugeecampsareoftenlocatedinremoteareas[156]thischallengecouldbefurtherexacerbatedinthesecontexts.Furthermore,Rwandaislandlockedandtransportingproductsfrommajorsportscanadd7-12%tothepriceofproducts[157].Theremotenessofsomelocationscanalsomeantheendusersneedtoberesponsibleforongoingmaintenanceandoperationofthesystem[116].LocalweathercanalsoreducetheperformanceofSHS[155].Forexample,inRwandaproblemswithlightscuttingoutanddissatisfactionwiththebrightnessoflightshavebeenlinkedtoinsufficientchargingcausedbypoorclimaticconditions[97].SimilarissueshavebeenidentifiedinothercountriessuchasinBangladesh[104]andinFrenchGuyana[111].

SHSareoftenpromotedforenvironmentalreasons[105]andarewidelyconsideredtobeanenvironmentallyfriendlysolutionforsupplyingelectricity[158–160].However,themanufactureanddistributionofSHShasapotentiallysignificantenvironmentalimpact[46,159,161–165].Dependingonseveralvariables,particularlythepredictedbatteryrecyclingratesandthenumberofkerosenelanternsreplaced,aSHSwasshowntohavea0.5-2yearpaybacktimeforgreenhousegasemissions,whereasreplacingadieselgeneratorwithaSHSwasfoundtohavea6-13yearpaybacktime[165].However,itisworthnotingthatthecontinentofAfricahasrelativelylowgreenhousegasemissions,atanestimated2–3%ofglobalCO2emissions[28],andtheexistingenvironmentalimpactofrefugeesisextremelylow.TheaggregatedpotentialtomitigategreenhousegasemissionsforallrefugeehouseholdsinRwanda,forexample,wouldbesimilarlylowbutprovidingSHSwouldoffermoderateCO2savingsatanindividuallevel.

Anestimated20,000displacedpeopledieeachyearbecauseofpoorindoorairquality[2]andveryfewstudieshaveconsideredtheissuespecificallyinhumanitariancontexts[166].However,evidencedoesindicatethatuserscanalsobenefitfromimprovedindoorairqualitywhereaSHSreplacestraditionallightingsourceswhichreleaseparticulatematter,carbonmonoxide,nitricoxidesandsulphurdioxide[46,97,167–169].AlthoughtheRE4Rsurveyidentifiedlimiteduseoftraditionallightingsources,householdstypicallyhavefewroomswithpoorventilation,whichexacerbatestheimpactofanyemissions.CautionneedstobetakenbecausesmallerSHSaresometimesnotsufficientforhouseholdneeds,whichcancausehouseholdstosupplementtheSHSwithtraditionallightingtechnologies[110].Furthermore,theamountofemissionsreleasedbytraditionallightingtechnologiesisrelativelysmallcomparedtoemissionsfromhouseholdcooking[170].AlthoughcookingcannotbesupportedbyexistingSHStherearearangeofelectriccookingdevelopmentsemergingthatcouldpotentiallyenablethisinthefuture[36,106,171,172].

Whathappenstosolarpowerproductswhentheybreakdownhasalsobeenneglected[173,174].ThisisinpartbecausewastemanagementsystemsareoftennonexistentinruralAfrica,forexampleinRwandapeopleareknowntohavedisposedofbatteriesinlatrines[175,176].Atthetimeofpublicationtherewerenostudiesspecificallyaddressingthischallengeinhumanitariancontextsalthoughtherewas

anongoingstudybeingconductedby[177].Furthermore,manyoftherawmaterialsneededtoproducethecomponentsofaSHSincludingthesolarpanelandbatteryaresourcedfromfragilestatesorthosethatsufferhighlevelsofcorruption[178],andwherepovertyandthepotentialforresourcerelatedconflictexists[179,180].Existingresearchsuggeststhatendusersneedtobeawareofenvironmentalissuesandsupportenvironmentalpoliciesandregulationsforwastemanagementtobesuccessful[46].However,thereareoftenproblemsassociatedwiththedisseminationofinformationonenvironmentalissuesamongrefugeecamps,althoughtraditionalformsofcommunicationsuchasstorytellinganddancehaveprovedeffectiveinsomecases[181].ThisapproachwasutilisedbytheRE4RprojectwhichengagedacommunitytheatregroupaspartofawiderstrategytoraiseawarenessaboutSHSandrenewableenergygenerallyinthecamps.

5.0 Discussion

Thereareanincreasingnumberofpoliticalcommitmentshighlightingtheimportanceofenergyandtheinclusionofdisplacedpeopleinthesepoliciesisanimportantcontributiontoensuringrefugeesarenotleftbehind.However,manyrefugeeshavehistoricallybeenleftbehind;forexample,atthetimeoftheRE4Rsurvey,fewerthanoneinfivehouseholdsacrossGihembe,KigemeandNyabihekecampsprimarilyusedtechnologiescapableofprovidingTier2electricityaccess.Thesepoliciesarenotenoughontheirownandmoreprogresscouldbemadeifcountriesenshrinedinlawthataccesstoenergyisalegalright.Ouranalysisalsosuggeststhataligningenergyinterventionswithexistinggovernmentpolicyandhumanitarianagencies’targetsislikelytoincreasethesuccessofanyproject.Forexample,inthecaseofRwanda,theGovernmenthasmultiplepoliciespromotingenergyaccessandSHSthatrefugeeenergyinitiatives,suchastheRE4Rproject,canalignwith.However,energyinterventionscanalsobehinderedbythelackofgovernmentsupportandfutureprojectsshouldevaluatewhetheroperatinginthesecontextswouldbeeffective.Althoughthereislimitedevidenceatpresent,ensuringtherefugeeshavethelegalrighttoworkandfreedomofmovementcouldhelppeopleaccessenergyinrefugeecampcontexts.Furthermore,ensuringproductsmeetminimumlegallybindingstandardscouldimprovecustomertrustinproductsandincreaselevelsofdiffusion.

Theeconomicanalysishasidentifiedthatthereisashortageoffundinginhibitingaccesstoenergyinrefugeesituations.However,italsoidentifiedanincreasingfocus,particularlyinprotractedcrises,onprovidingenergythroughmarket-baseddeliverymodelswhichcanbeimpededbythefreedistributionofproducts.Furthermore,thecostofsystems,fluctuatingandinsecureincomes,andresettlementaspirationareamajorbarrierpreventinghouseholdsfrompurchasingSHS.Theuseofcash-basedtransfersinthethreecamps,andtheresultsofthesurveythatsuggestthathouseholdswhichpaidforsolarproductssufferedfewerissues,indicatethatmarket-baseddeliverywouldbesuccessfulinthecamps.Animportantconsiderationforfutureprogrammesishowtoenableaccessamonglower-incomehouseholdswithoutcausingdamagetomarket-deliverymodels,particularlyasaminorityofhouseholdsinthecampswerefoundtohaveawageearnerwhichmaylimittheircapacitytomakeconsistentpaymentstoSHSsuppliers.

ThefindingssuggestthatSHScanhavepositiveimpactsonthesocialwellbeingofhouseholdsprimarilythroughbetterlightingandaccesstoentertainment.InallthethreecampshouseholdswithaccesstoSHShadagreaterdurationoflightingintheevening.However,thereislimitedevidenceontheroleSHScanplayinimprovinghouseholdincome,buthome-basedentrepreneursmayhaveagreatercapacityto

accessthesesystems,asagreaterproportionofbusinessesinthethreecampshadSHScomparedtohouseholds.Ouranalysisalsohighlightstheimportanceofembeddingend-userpreferencesintoprojectsandidentifiesthechallengesassociatedwithachievingthis.Forexample,researchsuggeststhatsurveyrespondentsmaymisleadenumeratorsorbeunabletorecallinformationthatislaterusedtoguidedecisionmaking;inthecaseoftheRE4Rsurvey,respondentsexpressedadesireforservicesthatcanbereadilyprovidedbySHS,butmayhavebeenunawareofothersorunwillingtosuggestthemincasetheymightbeconsideredunfeasible.Allowingforthedeliveryofmultipleproductsandservicestoensureuserscanchoosewhatmeetstheirneedsisalsoimportant,althoughthisneedstobebalancedagainstminimisingprogrammecosts.

ThetechnologicalanalysisestablishedthatSHScanmeettheenergyneedsidentifiedbyusersandhighlightedtheimportanceofminimumstandardsforensuringqualityproductsareavailabletohouseholds.Rwandahasthelegalmechanismsinplacetooverseethis,howevertheseneedtobeenforcedappropriately.OuranalysisalsoindicatesthatprojectedimprovementsinbatteryandsolarPVtechnologycouldimprovethecapacityofsystemswhilealsoreducingcosts.Furthermore,awiderrangeofappliancesmaycontributetowardsenablingenterprisestogenerateadditionalincomebeyondthoseassociatedwithlightingandmobilephonecharging.

AlthoughSHSareoftenportrayedasanenvironmentallyfriendlyproduct,ouranalysishasidentifiedthatthereareimportantissuesregardingwastethatshouldbeaddressed.ThefindingsalsoindicatethatSHShavelimitedpotentialtoimproveindoorairpollutionbecausethemajorityofthiscomesfromcookingwhichSHScannotcurrentlysupport.Thevariabilityofthelocalclimateisalsohighlightedasanissuethathasledtouserdissatisfactionwithsystems.

Theimportanceofembeddingsufficienttrainingforusersandtechnicians,aswellasensuringtheprovisionofaccurateinformationonthebenefitsandlimitationsofSHShasbeenidentifiedacrossallthePESTLEfactorsanalysed.Forexample,trainingneedstobeprovidedontheproperinstallationandmaintenanceofsystemstoensureoptimumperformanceandusersatisfaction,andtorectifyissueswhentheyoccur.Energyandfinancialliteracyeducationcanalsoimproveuserawarenessofthebenefitswhichcanimproveuptake.

6.0 Limitations

Thereareseverallimitationsofthisresearchthatneededtobeaddressedinfuturestudies.ThispaperfocusesonRwanda,acountrywithrelativelyprogressivepoliciestowardsenergyaccessandrefugees,andthefindingsmaynoteasilytranslatetoothercountrycontexts,particularlythoseoutsideEastAfrica.ThethreecampsconsideredherearelikelytobebroadlyreflectiveofthesituationsintheotherrefugeecampsinRwanda,buteachwillhavetheirownlevelsofaccesstoenergytechnologiesandenablingandlimitingfactorsofSHSdiffusion.Itisalsoworthnotingthatbecausethereisalimitedamountofresearchonhumanitarianenergy[95],elementsofouranalysishavebeenbasedonevidencefromthewiderdevelopmentliterature.Newchallengescouldemergeinhumanitariancontextssuchastheimpactprospectsofrepatriationorclaimingasylumhasonhouseholdwillingnesstoadoptsystems.ThispaperalsoonlyconsidersSHSandfutureresearchcouldconductsimilaranalysisofothertechnologies,suchasminigridsorsolarlanterns,aswellasfurtherresearchoncookingandinstitutionalenergywhichcouldhelploweremissionsandreducecosts.Intermsofthemethodologicallimitations,thePESTLEanalysisprovidesasnapshotwhichislikelytochangeasSHStechnologiesanddelivery

modelsdevelopandthehumanitarianenergysectordevelops.Thedescriptionoftheenergysituationinthecampsisalsoonlyabriefoverviewanddoesnotcapturethefulldetailsofenergyaccessinthethreecamps.Therearealsomethodologicallimitationsassociatedwiththesurveyused,forexamplethepotentialmisinterpretationofquestionsorresponsesandaccuracyofresponses,particularlywhenrespondentswereaskedtorecalldataoveraperiodoftime,suchasforenergyexpenditure.Theprocessesusedtovalidatethefindingsofthispaperaredescribedinmoredetailinsection2.0butinevitablywouldrequirefurtherrepetitiontoremainup-to-dateasthesituationinthecampsdevelops.

7.0 Conclusion and Future Research

Theobjectivesofthispaperweretoaddressalackofdatacurrentlyavailableontheenergysituationinhumanitariansettingsandtoconductanovelanalysisofthepolitical,economic,social,technological,legalandenvironmentalbarriersandenablersthatneedtobeaddressedtoenablewidespreadadoptionanduseofSHS.ThesetwoobjectiveswereachievedforthecaseofthreerefugeecampsinRwandabypresentinganoverviewoftheelectricityaccesssituationinhouseholdsandsmallenterprisesandthroughtheapplicationofaPESTLEanalysiswhichinvestigatedthefactorsinfluencingthesuccessofSHSprojects.

Theresultsofthisanalysisdemonstratethataccesstoelectricityinthecampsislowandthatthereislimitedpenetrationofmodernenergytechnologiesdespitedemandfortheservicestheycanprovide.ThePESTLEanalysisestablishedthattherearemultipleopportunities,suchasensuringenergyinterventionsalignwithhostcountrypoliciesandalsobenefitthelocalhostcommunity,andthreats,suchasthelowandvariableincomesofmanyrefugeesaswellasensuringgoodmaintenanceprovisionismadethatimpactthediffusionofSHSinthecamps.

Ouranalysishasalsoidentifiedanumberofareasthatjustifyfurtherresearch.Inparticular,thereislimitedinformationavailableintheexistingliteratureregardinghowlegal(section4.5)andenvironmental(section4.6)factorscaninfluencethediffusionofSHSinhumanitariancontexts.Furthermore,whilewehavebeenabletoidentifymultiplebarriersandconcernspresent,wehavenotbeenabletoconductabarrieranalysiswhichcouldcapturetheperceptionsofdifferentstakeholders;analyseshowthesecouldbeaddressedwouldbeofvaluetothesector.Asdiscussedinsection6.0,ouranalysisonlycoverstheRwandancontextandwhileeffortshavebeenmadetoensureourfindingsarevalidforothercontexts,comparisonstudiesthatreviewdifferentcountries,particularlythosewithdifferentclimatesorpoliciestowardsrefugees,wouldbeuseful.

Overall,thefindingsofouranalysisdemonstratethatinordertomaximisethediffusionandsustainabilityofinterventions,futureSHSprojectsinrefugeecampsshouldaimto(1)evaluatetheneedsandprioritiesofrefugeeandthesurroundinghostcommunitiesinordertomatchinterventionstotheirrequirements;(2)alignprojectswithhostcountrypoliciesrelatedtoenergyaccessandpoliciesassociatedwithrefugeerightstoworkandfreedomtomoveoutsidethecamps;(3)ensurethathostcommunitiesarealsoabletoaccesstheinterventionsmadetoavoidpotentialconflictbetweenlocalpopulations;(4)avoidthefreedistributionofproductsinallbutemergencycontextsandespeciallywherelocalmarketsarealreadyoperatingorwheretheycanbedeveloped;(5)integratetheprovisionoftrainingonenergyliteracyincludingthebenefitsofaccesstomodernenergyanddeliverymodelsintoprojects;and(6)ensureminimumstandardsareadheredtoandadequatemaintenanceisprovidedbySHSsupplierstoavoidsystemfailureandcustomerdissatisfaction.Addressingthesefactorswillhelp

ensureSHSsuccessinhumanitariansettingsandwillcontributetoachievingtargetssuchastheUNHCRCleanEnergyChallenge.

Data Availability

DatafromthequantitativesurveyingactivitiesundertakenaspartoftheRE4RprojectareavailablefromboththeHumanitarianDataExchange(HumanitarianDataExchangePracticalActionDatasets,2019,https://data.humdata.org/organization/practicalaction)andtheHEEDproject(HEEDProjectDataPortal,2019,http://heed-refugee.coventry.ac.uk/data-portal/).

Acknowledgements

TheauthorswouldliketoacknowledgetheIKEAFoundationforfundingtheRE4Rprojectandthankallthemembersoftheprojectwhocollectedthedata,providedfeedbackduringthedevelopmentofthepaper,particularlyfromPracticalActionwhoalsoallowedthereproductionoffigure2.PeterThomaswouldalsoliketoacknowledgetheEPSRCforfundinghisPhDandKarenBellforhersupport.PhilipSandwellwouldliketoacknowledgethesupportofEPSRC(EP/R511547/1andEP/R030235/1)andResearchEnglandGCRFQRFunding,andthankhissupervisorProfessorJennyNelson.

References

[1] IRENA.Renewablesforrefugeesettlements:Sustainableenergyaccessinhumanitariansituations.AbuDhabi:2019.

[2] LahnG,GrafhamO.Heat,LightandPowerforRefugees:SavingLives,ReducingCosts2015.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604566113.

[3] LehneJ,BlythW,LahnG,BazilianM,GrafhamO.Energyservicesforrefugeesanddisplacedpeople.EnergyStrategRev2016;13–14:134–46.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESR.2016.08.008.

[4] CaniatoM,CarliezD,ThulstrupA.Challengesandopportunitiesofnewenergyschemesforfoodsecurityinhumanitariancontexts:Aselectivereview.SustainEnergyTechnolAssessments2017;22:208–19.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SETA.2017.02.006.

[5] GrafhamO,VianelloM.EnergyforDisplacement:KeyIssues.2018.

[6] BarbieriJ,LeonforteF,ColomboE.Towardsanholisticapproachtoenergyaccessinhumanitariansettings:theSET4foodprojectfromtechnologytransfertoknowledgesharing.JIntHumanitAction2018;3:11.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-018-0038-3.

[7] CallaghyK.InterviewwithKathleenCallaghyofCleanCookingAlliance2020.

[8] BellancaR.SustainableEnergyProvisionAmongDisplacedPopulations :PolicyandPractice2014:1–61.

[9] KyteR.OnWorldHumanitarianDay,it’stimewefinallytalkaboutenergyaccess:SEforALL.2019.https://www.seforall.org/news/on-world-humanitarian-day-its-time-we-finally-talk-about-energy-access(accessedFebruary10,2019).

[10] SE4ALL.SustainableEnergyforAll2017.

[11] MerieauL,EgziabherG.LightYearsAhead:InnovativeTechnologyforBetterRefugeeProtection.Geneva,Switzerland:2012.

[12] GunningR.TheCurrentStateofSustainableEnergyProvisionforDisplacedPopulations :AnAnalysis2014:1–85.

[13] MillsE.Identifyingandreducingthehealthandsafetyimpactsoffuel-basedlighting.EnergySustainDev2016;30:39–50.https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2015.11.002.

[14] DupinV.JordanImpactsofElectiricty.ParticipatoryImpactAssessmentofElectricityAccessinZaatariandAzraqCamps.2018.

[15] UNHCR.CleanEnergyChallenge2019.https://www.unhcr.org/uk/clean-energy-challenge.html(accessedJanuary24,2020).

[16] ESMAP.BeyondConnections:EnergyAccessRedefined.WashingtonDC:2015.

[17] UNHCR.FiguresataGlance2019.https://www.unhcr.org/ph/figures-at-a-glance(accessedFebruary27,2019).

[18] QuakE.Thecostsandbenefitsoflightingandelectricityservicesforoff-gridpopulationsinsub-SaharaAfrica.K4DHelpdeskReport.Brighton,UK:2018.

[19] NarayanN,ChamseddineA,VegaV,QinZ,PopovicJ,BauerP,etal.QuantifyingtheBenefitsofaSolarHomeSystem-BasedDCMicrogridforRuralElectrification.Energies2019;12:938.https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050938.

[20] YadavP,HeynenAP,PalitD.Pay-As-You-Gofinancing:AmodelforviableandwidespreaddeploymentofsolarhomesystemsinruralIndia.EnergySustainDev2019;48:139–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.12.005.

[21] WhitehouseK.AdoptingaMarket-basedApproachtoBoostEnergyAccessinDisplacedContexts.London:2019.

[22] OkelloS.TheEnergySituationintheDadaabRefugeeCamps,Kenya.London:2016.

[23] CorbynD,VianelloM.Prices,ProductsandPriorities.MeetingRefugees’EnergyNeedsinBurkinaFasoandKenya.London:2018.

[24] LahnG,GrafhamO.EnergyfortheForciblyDisplaced.London:ChathamHouse;2015.

[25] BisagaI,ParikhP,MulugettaY,HailuY,SovacoolBK,UrpelainenJ,etal.Toclimbornottoclimb?InvestigatingenergyusebehaviouramongSolarHomeSystemadoptersthroughenergyladderandsocialpracticelens.EnergyResSocSci2018;44:61–74.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.019.

[26] UNITAR.TheGlobalPlanofActionforSustainableEnergySolutionsinSituationsofDisplacement.FrameworkforAction.Geneva,Switzerland:2018.

[27] GrafhamO,SandwellP.Harnessbetterdatatoimproveprovisionofhumanitarianenergy.NatEnergy2019;4:993–6.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0518-8.

[28] WamukonyaN.SolarhomesystemelectrificationasaviabletechnologyoptionforAfrica’s

development.EnergyPolicy2007;35:6–14.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2005.08.019.

[29] FriebeCA,FlotowPvon,TäubeFA.Exploringthelinkbetweenproductsandservicesinlow-incomemarkets—Evidencefromsolarhomesystems.EnergyPolicy2013;52:760–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2012.10.038.

[30] SovacoolBK,D’AgostinoAL,JainBambawaleM,ChowdhurySA,MourshedM,KabirSMR,etal.Solar-basedruralelectrificationpolicydesign:TheRenewableEnergyServiceCompany(RESCO)modelinFiji.RenewEnergy2011;36:797–803.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.015.

[31] AzimohCL,KlintenbergP,WallinF,KarlssonB.Illuminatedbutnotelectrified:AnassessmentoftheimpactofSolarHomeSystemonruralhouseholdsinSouthAfrica.ApplEnergy2015;155:354–64.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.120.

[32] DialloA,MoussaRK.Theeffectsofsolarhomesystemonwelfareinoff-gridareas:EvidencefromCôted’Ivoire.Energy2020;194:116835.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2019.116835.

[33] ChakrabartyS,IslamT.Financialviabilityandeco-efficiencyofthesolarhomesystems(SHS)inBangladesh.Energy2011;36:4821–7.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.016.

[34] NewcombeA,AckomEK.Sustainablesolarhomesystemsmodel:ApplyinglessonsfromBangladeshtoMyanmar’sruralpoor.EnergySustainDev2017;38:21–33.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.03.002.

[35] StojanovskiO,ThurberM,WolakF.Ruralenergyaccessthroughsolarhomesystems:Usepatternsandopportunitiesforimprovement.EnergySustainDev2017;37:33–50.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2016.11.003.

[36] BhattacharyyaSC.Renewableenergiesandthepoor:nicheornexus?EnergyPolicy2006;34:659–63.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2004.08.009.

[37] SovacoolBK.Successandfailureinthepoliticaleconomyofsolarelectrification:LessonsfromWorldBankSolarHomeSystem(SHS)projectsinSriLankaandIndonesia.EnergyPolicy2018;123:482–93.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2018.09.024.

[38] ZalengeraC,BlanchardRE,EamesPC,JumaAM,ChitawoML,GondweKT.OverviewoftheMalawienergysituationandAPESTLEanalysisforsustainabledevelopmentofrenewableenergy.RenewSustainEnergyRev2014;38:335–47.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2014.05.050.

[39] YudhaSW,TjahjonoB,KoliosA.APESTLEPolicyMappingandStakeholderAnalysisofIndonesia’sFossilFuelEnergyIndustry.Energies2018;11:1272.https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051272.

[40] KoliosA,ReadG.APolitical,Economic,Social,Technology,LegalandEnvironmental(PESTLE)ApproachforRiskIdentificationoftheTidalIndustryintheUnitedKingdom.Energies2013;6:5023–45.https://doi.org/10.3390/en6105023.

[41] VianelloM.TheEnergySituationinGoudouboRefugeeCamp,BurkinaFaso.London:2016.

[42] TwidellJ,WeirT.RenewableEnergyResources.Taylor&Francis;2006.

[43] LauferD,SchäferM.TheimplementationofSolarHomeSystemsasapovertyreductionstrategy—AcasestudyinSriLanka.EnergySustainDev2011;15:330–6.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2011.07.002.

[44] PalitD.Solarenergyprogramsforruralelectrification:ExperiencesandlessonsfromSouthAsia.EnergySustainDev2013;17:270–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2013.01.002.

[45] LysenE.PicoSolarPVSystemsforRemoteHomes:ANewGenerationofSmallPVSystemsforLightingandCommunication.2013.

[46] FeronS.Sustainabilityofoff-gridphotovoltaicsystemsforruralelectrificationindevelopingcountries:Areview.Sustainability2016;8.https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121326.

[47] RhamanM.ARemarkableCostEffectiveSolarHomeSysteminRuralAreaofBangladesh.CurrAlternEnergy2018;03.https://doi.org/10.2174/2405463103666180402143554.

[48] Abdul-SalamY,PhimisterE.Modellingtheimpactofmarketimperfectionsonfarmhouseholdinvestmentinstand-alonesolarPVsystems.WorldDev2019;116:66–76.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2018.12.007.

[49] NarayanN,ChamseddineA,Vega-GaritaV,QinZ,Popovic-GerberJ,BauerP,etal.ExploringtheboundariesofSolarHomeSystems(SHS)foroff-gridelectrification:OptimalSHSsizingforthemulti-tierframeworkforhouseholdelectricityaccess.ApplEnergy2019;240:907–17.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2019.02.053.

[50] BertheauP.AssessingtheimpactofrenewableenergyonlocaldevelopmentandtheSustainableDevelopmentGoals:InsightsfromasmallPhilippineisland.TechnolForecastSocChange2020;153:119919.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2020.119919.

[51] ShakyaB,BruceA,MacGillI.Surveybasedcharacterisationofenergyservicesforimproveddesignandoperationofstandalonemicrogrids.RenewSustainEnergyRev2019;101:493–503.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2018.11.016.

[52] GrohS,PachauriS,RaoND.Whatarewemeasuring?AnempiricalanalysisofhouseholdelectricityaccessmetricsinruralBangladesh.EnergySustainDev2016;30:21–31.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2015.10.007.

[53] PracticalAction.PoorPeople’sEnergyOutlook2016.Rugby:2016.

[54] PracticalAction.PoorPeople’sEnergyOutlook2017.Rugby:2017.

[55] SandwellP,TungeT,OkelloA,MuhorakeyeL,SangwaF,WatersL,etal.EnsuringrefugeecampsinRwandahaveaccesstosustainableenergy.Rugby,UK:2020.

[56] CrossJ,MartinC,DouglasM,RayC,VerhoevenG,OkelloA,etal.TheLivedExperienceofEnergyandForcedDisplacement.PracticalAction;2018.

[57] BasuR.ImplementingQuality:APracticalGuidetoToolsandTechniques :EnablingthePowerofOperationalExcellence.ThomsonLearning;2004.

[58] TurnerJ.Gowerhandbookofprojectmanagement2007.

[59] UNHCR.MonthlyPopulationStatisticsasof30thSeptember2019.Kigali,Rwanda:2019.

[60] AlloushM,TaylorJE,GuptaA,RojasValdesRI,Gonzalez-EstradaE.EconomicLifeinRefugeeCamps.WorldDev2017;95:334–47.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2017.02.030.

[61] ChadwickT.InvestigatingfinancingoptionsfordomesticrenewableenergysolutionsinrefugeecampsinRwanda.ImperialCollegeLondon,2019.

[62] Thepowertorespond.NatEnergy2019;4:989.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0528-6.

[63] HuberS,MachE.Policiesforincreasedsustainableenergyaccessindisplacementsettings.NatEnergy2019;4:1000–2.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0520-1.

[64] SovacoolBK.AqualitativefactoranalysisofrenewableenergyandSustainableEnergyforAll(SE4ALL)intheAsia-Pacific.EnergyPolicy2013;59:393–403.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.03.051.

[65] WorldBank.SustainableEnergyforAll2017—ProgresstowardSustainableEnergy.WashingtonDC:2017.

[66] UnitedNations.Transformingourworld:the2030AgendaforSustainableDevelopment.2015.

[67] NahmiasP,BaalN.IncludingforceddisplacementintheSDGs:anewrefugeeindicator.UNHCRBlogs2019.https://www.unhcr.org/blogs/including-forced-displacement-in-the-sdgs-a-new-refugee-indicator/(accessedMarch24,2020).

[68] GerrardM.SafeAccesstoFuelandEnergy:Alifelineforrefugeewomenandgirls.BoilPoint2016:6–9.

[69] UNHCR.ClusterApproach(IASC).Geneva,Switzerland:2020.

[70] UNHCR.RefugeeCoordinationModel(RCM).Geneva,Switzerland:2020.

[71] UNHCR.GlobalStrategyforSustainableEnergy2019.https://www.unhcr.org/partners/projects/5db16a4a4/global-strategy-for-sustainable-energy.html(accessedOctober29,2019).

[72] KhanJ,ArsalanMH.Solarpowertechnologiesforsustainableelectricitygeneration–Areview.RenewSustainEnergyRev2016;55:414–25.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2015.10.135.

[73] UrmeeT,HarriesD.DeterminantsofthesuccessandsustainabilityofBangladesh’sSHSprogram.RenewEnergy2011;36:2822–30.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2011.04.021.

[74] LahnG.Thinkingdifferentlyaboutenergyaccessindisplacementsituations.2019.

[75] KhanI.Impactsofenergydecentralizationviewedthroughthelensoftheenergyculturesframework:Solarhomesystemsinthedevelopingeconomies.RenewSustainEnergyRev2019:109576.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2019.109576.

[76] UrmeeT,HarriesD.AsurveyofsolarPVprogramimplementersinAsiaandthePacificregions.EnergySustainDev2009;13:24–32.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2009.01.002.

[77] BoamahF,RothfußE.‘Practicalrecognition’asasuitablepathwayforresearchingjustenergyfutures:Seeinglikea‘modern’electricityuserinGhana.EnergyResSocSci2020;60:101324.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2019.101324.

[78] StapletonGJ.Successfulimplementationofrenewableenergytechnologiesindevelopingcountries.Desalination2009.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.05.107.

[79] DerksM,RomijnH.Sustainableperformancechallengesofruralmicrogrids:AnalysisofincentivesandpolicyframeworkinIndonesia.EnergySustainDev2019;53:57–70.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2019.08.003.

[80] PatelL,GrossK.CookinginDisplacementSettingsEngagingthePrivateSectorinNon-wood-basedFuelSupply.London:2019.

[81] ConwayD,RobinsonB,MudimuP,ChitekweT,KorantengK,SwillingM.Exploringhybridmodelsforuniversalaccesstobasicsolarenergyservicesininformalsettlements:CasestudiesfromSouthAfricaandZimbabwe.EnergyResSocSci2019;56:101202.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2019.05.012.

[82] HarildN,ChristensenA.THEDEVELOPMENTCHALLENGEOFFINDINGDURABLESOLUTIONSFORREFUGEESANDINTERNALLYDISPLACEDPEOPLE.2010.

[83] GrafhamO,LahnG,LehneJ.MovingEnergyInitiative:Estimatingtheglobalenergyuseofforciblydisplacedpeople.BoilPoint2016:12–5.

[84] Rosenberg-JansenS,TungeT,KayumbaT.Inclusiveenergysolutionsinrefugeecamps.NatEnergy2019;4:990–2.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0516-x.

[85] RepublicofRwanda.EconomicDevelopmentandPovertyReductionStrategyII.Kigali,Rwanda:2013.

[86] RepublicofRwanda.RwandaVision2020.Kigali,Rwanda:2000.

[87] RepublicofRwanda.NationalStrategyforTransformation.Kigali,Rwanda:2017.

[88] RepublicofRwanda.RuralElectrificationStrategy.Kigali,Rwanda:2016.

[89] UNHCR.RwandaCountryRefugeeResponsePlan2019-2020.Kigali,Rwanda:2019.

[90] UNHCR.EconomicInclusionofRefugeesinRwanda.2016.

[91] LyytinenE.HouseholdenergyinrefugeeandIDPcamps:challengesandsolutionsforUNHCR.2009.

[92] PracticalAction.ContextualReviewReport.Rugby,UK:2019.

[93] VanLandeghemL.Private-SectorEngagementTheKeytoEfficient,EffectiveEnergyAccessforRefugees.London:2016.

[94] BoodhnaA,SissonsC,Fullwood-ThomasJ.Asystemsthinkingapproachforenergymarketsinfragileplaces.NatEnergy2019;4:997–9.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0519-7.

[95] Rosenberg-JansenS.ResearchinBrief:RefugeeEnergy.Oxford:2018.

[96] LenzL,MunyehirweA,PetersJ,SievertM.DoesLarge-ScaleInfrastructureInvestmentAlleviatePoverty?ImpactsofRwanda’sElectricityAccessRoll-OutProgram.WorldDev2017;89:88–110.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2016.08.003.

[97] CollingsS,MunyehirweA.Pay-as-you-gosolarPVinRwanda:evidenceofbenefitstousersandissuesofaffordability.FActionsSciReports2016:94–103.

[98] PodeR.FinancingLEDsolarhomesystemsindevelopingcountries.RenewSustainEnergyRev2013;25:596–629.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2013.04.004.

[99] KanyarusokeK.ProblemsofengineeringentrepreneurshipinAfrica:Adesignoptimizationexampleinsolarthermalengineering.EngSciTechnolanIntJ2019.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.05.002.

[100] MorrisE,WinieckiJ,ChowdharyS,CortigliaK.UsingMicrofinancetoExpandAccesstoEnergyServices:SummaryofFindings.WashingtonDC:2007.

[101] KhanT,KhanamSN,RahmanMH,RahmanSM.Determinantsofmicrofinancefacilityforinstallingsolarhomesystem(SHS)inruralBangladesh.EnergyPolicy2019;132:299–308.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2019.05.047.

[102] BhattacharyyaSC.Financingenergyaccessandoff-gridelectrification:Areviewofstatus,optionsandchallenges.RenewSustainEnergyRev2013;20:462–72.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.008.

[103] DoocyS,TappisH.Cash-basedapproachesinhumanitarianemergencies:asystematicreview.CampbellSystRev2017;13:1–200.https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2017.17.

[104] MondalAH,KleinD.ImpactsofsolarhomesystemsonsocialdevelopmentinruralBangladesh.EnergySustainDev2011;15:17–20.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2010.11.004.

[105] BaurzhanS,JenkinsGP.Off-gridsolarPV:IsitanaffordableorappropriatesolutionforruralelectrificationinSub-SaharanAfricancountries?RenewSustainEnergyRev2016;60:1405–18.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2016.03.016.

[106] BisagaI,Puźniak-HolfordN,GrealishA,Baker-BrianC,ParikhP.Scalableoff-gridenergyservicesenabledbyIoT:AcasestudyofBBOXXSMARTSolar.EnergyPolicy2017;109:199–207.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.004.

[107] SharifI,MithilaM.RuralElectrificationusingPV:theSuccessStoryofBangladesh.EnergyProcedia2013;33:343–54.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2013.05.075.

[108] UrmeeT,HarriesD.ThesolarhomePVprograminFiji–AsuccessfulRESCOapproach?RenewEnergy2012;48:499–506.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2012.06.017.

[109] WijayatungaPDC,AttalageRA.Socio-economicimpactofsolarhomesystemsinruralSriLanka:acase-study.EnergySustainDev2005;9:5–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60487-1.

[110] RahmanSM,AhmadMM.SolarHomeSystem(SHS)inruralBangladesh:Ornamentationorfactofdevelopment?EnergyPolicy2013;63:348–54.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.08.041.

[111] LinguetL,HidairI.AdetailedanalysisoftheproductivityofsolarhomesysteminanAmazonianenvironment.RenewSustainEnergyRev2010;14:745–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2009.06.015.

[112] NieuwenhoutFDJ,vanDijkA,LasschuitPE,vanRoekelG,vanDijkVAP,HirschD,etal.Experiencewithsolarhomesystemsindevelopingcountries:areview.ProgPhotovoltaicsResAppl2001;9:455–74.https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.392.

[113] OpiyoNN.ImpactsofneighbourhoodinfluenceonsocialacceptanceofsmallsolarhomesystemsinruralwesternKenya.EnergyResSocSci2019;52:91–8.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2019.01.013.

[114] RadulovicV.Arenewinstitutionaleconomicsenough?PromotingphotovoltaicsinIndia’sagriculturalsector.EnergyPolicy2005;33:1883–99.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2004.03.004.

[115] SovacoolBK,D’AgostinoAL,JainBambawaleM.Thesocio-technicalbarrierstoSolarHomeSystems(SHS)inPapuaNewGuinea:“Choosingpigs,prostitutes,andpokerchipsoverpanels.”EnergyPolicy2011;39:1532–42.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2010.12.027.

[116] BrooksC,UrmeeT.Importanceofindividualcapacitybuildingforsuccessfulsolarprogramimplementation:AcasestudyinthePhilippines.RenewEnergy2014;71:176–84.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2014.05.016.

[117] NarayanN,PopovicJ,DiehlJ-C,SilvesterS,BauerP,ZemanM.Developingfordevelopingnations:Exploringanaffordablesolarhomesystemdesign.GHTC2016-IEEEGlob.Humanit.Technol.Conf.Technol.BenefitHumanit.Conf.Proc.,2016,p.474–80.https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2016.7857322.

[118] Rosenberg-JansenS.Rethinkingtheeconomiclivesofrefugees.RethinkRefugBlog2019.https://www.rethinkingrefuge.org/articles/rethinking-energy-economies-for-refugees(accessedNovember7,2019).

[119] GrafhamO,LahnG,LehneJ.Energysolutionswithbothhumanitariananddevelopmentpay-offs.ForcedMigrRev2016:45–8.

[120] FaIDA.TestingtheAcceptabilityandSuitabilityofWakaWakaSolarLamps.2013.

[121] DynesM,TomczykB,RosenthalM,HardyC,WilliamsH,TorreL,etal.EvaluationofHandheldSolarLightsamongDisplacePopulationsinHaiti.InternationalRescueCommittee;2014.

[122] UlsrudK,WintherT,PalitD,RohracherH.Village-levelsolarpowerinAfrica:Acceleratingaccesstoelectricityservicesthroughasocio-technicaldesigninKenya.EnergyResSocSci2015;5:34–44.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2014.12.009.

[123] MartinotE,ChaureyA,LewD,MoreiraJR,WamukonyaN.RenewableEnergyMarketsinDevelopingCountries.AnnuRevEnergyEnviron2002;27:309–48.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.27.122001.083444.

[124] KimemiaD,VermaakC,PachauriS,RhodesB.Burns,scaldsandpoisoningsfromhouseholdenergyuseinSouthAfrica:Aretheenergypooratgreaterrisk?EnergySustainDev2014;18:1–8.https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2013.11.011.

[125] DworschakA,KleimanS.“Withlightthereismorelife”:Energyaccessforsafety,healthandwellbeinginemergencies.BoilPoint2016:2–5.

[126] LamNL,SmithKR,GauthierA,BatesMN.Kerosene:AReviewofHouseholdUsesandTheirHazardsinLow-AndMiddle-IncomeCountries.JToxicolEnvironHealthBCritRev2012;15:396–432.https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2012.710134.

[127] EpsteinMB,BatesMN,AroraNK,BalakrishnanK,JackDW,SmithKR.Householdfuels,lowbirthweight,andneonataldeathinIndia:Theseparateimpactsofbiomass,kerosene,andcoal.IntJHygEnvironHealth2013;216:523–32.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEH.2012.12.006.

[128] HirmerS,GuthrieP.Thebenefitsofenergyappliancesintheoff-gridenergysectorbasedonsevenoff-gridinitiativesinruralUganda.RenewSustainEnergyRev2017;79:924–34.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.152.

[129] MunzM,RasoulS.WakaWakaSolarLightFieldTestReport.Syria–HumanitarianResponse

Project2012-13.InternationalRescueCommittee;2013.

[130] Abdullah,ZhouD,ShahT,JebranK,AliS,AliA,etal.Acceptanceandwillingnesstopayforsolarhomesystem:SurveyevidencefromnorthernareaofPakistan.EnergyReports2017;3:54–60.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYR.2017.03.002.

[131] SovacoolBK,GriffithsS.Theculturalbarrierstoalow-carbonfuture:Areviewofsixmobilityandenergytransitionsacross28countries.RenewSustainEnergyRev2020;119:109569.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2019.109569.

[132] BeckF,MartinotE.RenewableEnergyPoliciesandBarriers.EncyclEnergy2004;5.https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00488-5.

[133] MulugettaY,NheteT,JacksonT.PhotovoltaicsinZimbabwe:lessonsfromtheGEFSolarproject.EnergyPolicy2000;28:1069–80.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00093-8.

[134] BhattacharyyaS,PalitD.Mini-gridsforruralelectrificationofdevelopingcountries:AnalysisandcasestudiesfromSouthAsia.SpringerInternationalPublishing;2014.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04816-1.

[135] MartinS,SusantoJ.SupplyingpowertoremotevillagesinLaoPDR.—Theroleofoff-griddecentralisedenergyoptions.EnergySustainDev2014;19:111–21.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2013.12.012.

[136] EberhardA,ShkaratanM.PoweringAfrica:Meetingthefinancingandreformchallenges.EnergyPolicy2012;42:9–18.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2011.10.033.

[137] IemsomboonP,TangthamN,KanjanasuntornS,BualertS.Modelingcommunityqualityoflifeindicatorsfordevelopingsolarhomesysteminremoteareas.EnergyProcedia,2011.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.09.006.

[138] AzimohCL,KlintenbergP,WallinF,KarlssonB.TheBurdenofShadingandLocationontheSustainabilityofSouthAfricanSolarHomeSystemProgram.EnergyProcedia,vol.75,Elsevier;2015,p.308–13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.360.

[139] BorahRR,PalitD,MahapatraS.ComparativeanalysisofsolarphotovoltaiclightingsystemsinIndia.EnergyProcedia,2014.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.309.

[140] BarmanM,MahapatraS,PalitD,ChaudhuryMK.PerformanceandimpactevaluationofsolarhomelightingsystemsontherurallivelihoodinAssam,India.EnergySustainDev2017;38:10–20.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2017.02.004.

[141] PalitD,ChaureyA.Off-gridruralelectrificationexperiencesfromSouthAsia:Statusandbestpractices.EnergySustainDev2011;15:266–76.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2011.07.004.

[142] UrpelainenJ.Energypovertyandperceptionsofsolarpowerinmarginalizedcommunities:SurveyevidencefromUttarPradesh,India.RenewEnergy2016;85:534–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2015.07.001.

[143] ZubiG,Dufo-LópezR,CarvalhoM,PasaogluG.Thelithium-ionbattery:Stateoftheartandfutureperspectives.RenewSustainEnergyRev2018;89:292–308.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2018.03.002.

[144] NayakPK,MaheshS,SnaithHJ,CahenD.Photovoltaicsolarcelltechnologies:analysingthestate

oftheart.NatRevMater2019;4:269–85.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-019-0097-0.

[145] EfficiencyforAccess.TheStateoftheoff-gridappliancemarket.2019.

[146] OmorogbeY,OrdorA.EndingAfrica’sEnergyDeficitandtheLaw:AchievingSustainableEnergyforAllinAfrica.1sted.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress;2018.https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198819837.001.0001.

[147] BarrieJ,CruickshankHJ.Sheddinglightonthelastmile:AstudyonthediffusionofPayAsYouGoSolarHomeSystemsinCentralEastAfrica.EnergyPolicy2017;107:425–36.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2017.05.016.

[148] ZetterR,RuaudelH.Refugees’righttoworkandaccesstolabourmarkets:constraints,challengesandwaysforward.ForcedMigrRev2018:4–7.

[149] ODI.AcceleratingaccesstoelectricityinAfricawithoff-gridsolar.Off-gridsolarcountrybriefing:Rwanda.London,UnitedKingdom:2016.

[150] USAID.Off-GridSolarMarketAssessmentRwanda.2019.

[151] ChowdhurySA,MourshedM.Off-gridelectrificationwithsolarhomesystems:Anappraisalofthequalityofcomponents.RenewEnergy2016;97:585–98.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.06.017.

[152] IOM.MinimumRequirementsforHouseholdLighting.Geneva,Switzerland:2019.

[153] ShellFoundation.LastMileSolutionsforLow-IncomeCustomers.2018.

[154] ShortT.SustainabledevelopmentinRwanda:IndustryandGovernment.SustainDev2008;16:56–69.https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.328.

[155] BisagaI.Scalingupoff-gridsolarenergyaccessthroughimprovedunderstandingofcustomers’needs,aspirationsandenergyuseofdecentralised(SMART)SolarHomeSystems–acasestudyofBBOXXcustomersinRwanda.UniversityCollegeLondon,2018.

[156] WerkerE.RefugeeCampEconomies.JRefugStud2007;20:461–80.https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem001.

[157] DischD,BronckaersJ.Ananalysisoftheoff-gridlightingmarketinRwanda:sales,distributionandmarketing.London,UnitedKingdom:2012.

[158] RahmanMM,SalehinS,IslamAKMS.Economicandenvironmentalassessmentsofsolarhomesystemsconsistingdifferentlightingsources.20164thInt.Conf.Dev.Renew.EnergyTechnol.,2016,p.1–6.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDRET.2016.7421473.

[159] ZubiG,FracastoroGV,Lujano-RojasJM,ElBakariK,AndrewsD.Theunlockedpotentialofsolarhomesystems;aneffectivewaytoovercomedomesticenergypovertyindevelopingregions.RenewEnergy2019;132:1425–35.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2018.08.093.

[160] PanwarNL,KaushikSC,KothariS.Roleofrenewableenergysourcesinenvironmentalprotection:Areview.RenewSustainEnergyRev2011;15:1513–24.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2010.11.037.

[161] MahapatraS,ChanakyaHN,DasappaS.EvaluationofvariousenergydevicesfordomesticlightinginIndia:Technology,economicsandCO2emissions.EnergySustainDev2009;13:271–9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2009.10.005.

[162] KomatsuS,KanekoS,ShresthaRM,GhoshPP.NonincomefactorsbehindthepurchasedecisionsofsolarhomesystemsinruralBangladesh.EnergySustainDev2011;15:284–92.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.03.003.

[163] BhattacharyyaSC.Energyaccessprogrammesandsustainabledevelopment:Acriticalreviewandanalysis.EnergySustainDev2012;16:260–71.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2012.05.002.

[164] LayJ,OndraczekJ,StoeverJ.Renewablesintheenergytransition:EvidenceonsolarhomesystemsandlightingfuelchoiceinKenya.EnergyEcon2013;40:350–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2013.07.024.

[165] AlsemaE.Environmentallifecycleassessmentofsolarhomesystems.Utrecht,Netherlands:2000.

[166] AlbadraD,KuchaiN,Acevedo-De-los-RíosA,Rondinel-OviedoD,ColeyD,daSilvaCF,etal.Measurementandanalysisofairqualityintemporarysheltersonthreecontinents.BuildEnviron2020;185:107259.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107259.

[167] LamNL,ChenY,WeyantC,VenkataramanC,SadavarteP,JohnsonMA,etal.HouseholdLightMakesGlobalHeat:HighBlackCarbonEmissionsFromKeroseneWickLamps.EnvironSciTechnol2012;46:13531–8.https://doi.org/10.1021/es302697h.

[168] PendletonL,KarlTR,MillsE.EconomicGrowthintheFaceofWeatherandClimateExtremes:ACallforBetterData.Eos,TransAmGeophysUnion2013;94:225–6.https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO250005.

[169] KomatsuS,KanekoS,GhoshPP.Aremicro-benefitsnegligible?TheimplicationsoftherapidexpansionofSolarHomeSystems(SHS)inruralBangladeshforsustainabledevelopment.EnergyPolicy2011;39:4022–31.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2010.11.022.

[170] BeggK,ParkinsonS,MulugettaY,WilkinsonR,DoigA,AndersonT.InitialEvaluationofCDMtypeprojectsinDevelopingCountries.Guildford:2000.

[171] BrownE,LearyJ,DaviesG,BatchelorS,ScottN.eCook:Whatbehaviouralchallengesawaitthispotentiallytransformativeconcept?SustainEnergyTechnolAssessments2017;22:106–15.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SETA.2017.02.021.

[172] ZubiG,SpertinoF,CarvalhoM,AdhikariRS,KhatibT.Developmentandassessmentofasolarhomesystemtocovercookingandlightingneedsindevelopingregionsasabetteralternativeforexistingpractices.SolEnergy2017;155:7–17.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2017.05.077.

[173] CrossJ,MurrayD.Theafterlivesofsolarpower:WasteandrepairoffthegridinKenya.EnergyResSocSci2018;44:100–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2018.04.034.

[174] KumarA,TurnerB.SociomaterialSolarWaste:AfterlivesandLivesAfterofSmallSolar.In:BombaertsG,JenkinsK,SanusiYA,GuoyuW,editors.EnergyJusticeAcrossBorders,Cham:SpringerInternationalPublishing;2020,p.155–73.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24021-9_8.

[175] BenschG,PetersJ,SievertM.ThelightingtransitioninruralAfrica—Fromkerosenetobattery-poweredLEDandtheemergingdisposalproblem.EnergySustainDev2017;39:13–20.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2017.03.004.

[176] NnoromIC,OsibanjoO.Overviewofelectronicwaste(e-waste)managementpracticesandlegislations,andtheirpoorapplicationsinthedevelopingcountries.ResourConservRecycl2008;52:843–58.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2008.01.004.

[177] InnovationNorway.Recyclingofsolarwasteinrefugeesettings2020.https://www.innovasjonnorge.no/no/subsites/hipnorway/innovation-projects2/tackling-the-issue-of-solar-waste-in-refugee-settings/(accessedJuly1,2020).

[178] ChurchC,CrawfordA.GreenConflictMinerals:Thefuelsofconflictinthetransitiontoalow-carboneconomy.Winnipeg:2018.

[179] HasanM,LahiriS.WarlordLedCivilConflictsforNaturalResources:PolicyOptionsforConflictResolution.JGlobPeaceConfl2017;5.https://doi.org/10.15640/jgpc.v5n1a1.

[180] AndrewsT,ElizaldeB,LeBillonP,OhCH,ReyesD,ThomsonI.TheRiseinConflictAssociatedwithMiningOperations:WhatLiesBeneath?2017.https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36488.62720.

[181] KakongeJO.Areviewofrefugeeenvironmental-orientedprojectsinAfrica:acaseforenvironmentalimpactassessment.ImpactAssessProjApprais2000;18:23–32.https://doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767565.

[182] LightingGLobal.SolarHomeSystemKitQualityStandards-Version2.5.2018.