An Academic presentation byDr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica Group: www.pubrica.comEmail: sales@pubrica.com

TODAY'S DISCUSSION

In Brief IntroductionNeed of systemic review and meta- analysisPhases to planning a systematic review and meta-analysisFuture scope Conclusion

Outline

According to the, a s ystematic review is "a scholarly method in which all empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility requirements is gathered to address a particular research question."

It entails systematically identifying, selecting, synthesising, and evaluating primary research studies to produce a high-quality summary of a subject while addressing a pre-specified research question.

A meta-analysis is a step forward from a systematic review in that it employs mathematical and statistical methods to summarise the results of studies included in the systematic review

IN BRIEF

In some aspects, s ystematic reviews vary from conventional narrative reviews.

Narrative reviews are mostly descriptive, do not require a systematic search of the literature, and concentrate on a subset of studies in a field selected based on availability or author preference.

As a result, although narrativeinformative, they often include an

reviewsare element

ofselection bias.

INTRODUCTION

Contd...

As the name implies, systematic reviews usually include a thorough and comprehensive plan and search strategy derived a priori to minimise bias by finding, evaluating, and synthesising all related studies on a given subject.

A meta-analysis aspect is often used in systematic reviews, which entails using statistical techniques to synthesise data from several studies into a single quantitative estimation or summary effect size.

It is a well-known and well-respected multinational non-profit organisation that promotes, funds, and disseminates systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effectiveness of healthcare interventions

NEED OF SYSTEMICREVIEW AND META- ANALYSISThere are several reasons for performinga systematic review and meta-analysis:

It may assist in resolving discrepancies in results published by individual studies that may include bias or errors.

Contd...

It may help identify areas in a field where there is a lack of evidence and areas where further research should be conducted.

It allows the combination of findings from different studies, highlighting newfindings relevant to practice or policy.

It may be able to reduce the need for additional trials.

Writing a systematic review and meta-analysis will help identify a researcher's field of interest since they are published in high-impact journals and receive many citations

Contd...

PHASES TO PLANNING A SYSTEMATICREVIEW AND META-ANALYSISThe succeeding components to a successful systematic review and meta-analysis writing are

FORMULATE THE REVIEW QUESTION

The first stage involves describing the review topic, formulating hypotheses, and developing a title for the review.

It's usually best to keep titles as short and descriptive as possible by following this formula: Intervention for those with a disease (e.g., Dialectical behaviour therapy for adolescent females with a borderline personality disorder).

Contd...

Since reviews published in other outlets do not need to be listed as such, they should state in the title that they are a systematic review and meta-analysis.

DEFINE INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

The PICO (or PICOC) acronym stands for population, intervention, comparison, outcomes (and context).

It can help ensure that all main components are decided upon before beginning the study.

Authors must, for example, choose their population age range, circumstances, results, and type(s) of interventions and control groups a priori.

Contd...

It's also crucial to determine what types of experiments to include and exclude (e.g., RCTs only, RCTs and quasi-experimental designs, qualitative research), the minimum number of participants in each group, published and unpublished studies, and language restrictions.

DEVELOP A SEARCH STRATEGY AND LOCATE STUDIES

This is where a reference librarian can be particularly beneficial in assisting with the creation and execution of electronic searches.

To recognise all applicable trials in a given region, it is essential to create a detailed list of key terms (i.e., "MeSH" terms) related to each component of PICOC.

The secret to creating an effective search strategy is to strike a balance between sensitivity and precision.

Contd...

SELECTION OF STUDIES

After retrieving and reviewing a detailed list of abstracts, any studies that tend to satisfy inclusion requirements will be collected and thoroughly reviewed.

To ensure inter-rater reliability, this procedure is usually carried out by at least two reviewers.

Contd...

It is suggested that authors maintain a list of all checked research, including reasons for inclusion or exclusion.

It might be possible to hire study authors to collect missing data for data pooling (e.g., means, standard deviations).

It's also possible that translations will be needed.

Contd...

EXTRACT DATA

To organise the information extracted from each reviewed study (e.g., authors, publication year, number of participants, age range, study design, results, included/excluded), building and using a basic data extraction type or chart can be beneficial.

Data extraction by at least two reviewers is necessary to ensure inter-rater reliability and prevent data entry errors.

Contd...

Table: 1 outline for systemic review and meta-analysis

ASSESS STUDY QUALITY

In recent years, there has been a push to improve the consistency of each RCT included in systematic reviews.

Double-blinding, which is acceptable for clinical trials but not for psychological ornon-pharmacological treatments, significantly impacts this metric.

Other more detailed guidelines and criteria, such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), as well as articles with recommendations for improving quality in RCTs and meta-analyses for psychological intervention, are available

Contd...

ANALYSE AND INTERPRET RESULTS

The Review Manager (RevMan) software, endorsed by the Cochrane Collaboration, is one example of a statistical programme that can measure effect s izes for meta-analyses The effect sizes are given, along with a 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) range, and are presented in both quantitative and graphical form (e.g., forest plots).

Each trial is visually represented as a horizontal diamond shape in forest plots. The middle represents the effect size (e.g., SMD) and the endpoints representing both ends of the CI.

Contd...

Since the Cochrane Collaboration's reviews in theonlineCochrane Database of Systematic

Reviews,

are publishedthey are often lengthyandcomprehensive.

As a result, it is possible and encouraged to publish abbreviated versions of the review in other applicable scholarly journals; indeed, engaging in a review update or joining a well-established review team may be a beneficial way to get involved in the s ystematic review process.

DISSEMINATE FINDINGS

FUTURE SCOPEThe systematic review's findings should be discussed interms of thestrength shortcomings

of evidenceof the initial

and researchused for the review.

It's also necessary to discuss thereview's weaknesses, the results' applicability (generalizability), and the findings' implications for patient care, public health, and future clinical research.

CONCLUSIONThe steps of a systematic review/meta- analysis include developing a research question and validating it, forming criteria, searching databases, importing all results to a library and exporting to an excel sheet, protocol writing and registration, title and abstract screening, full-text screening, manual searching, extracting data and assessing its quality, data checking, and conducting statistics.

Contd...

The PRISMA or Meta-analysis must be used to w rite up the systematic study and meta-analysis.

This is a reporting checklist for systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses that specifies what information should be included in each portion of a high-quality systematic review

UNITED KINGDOM+44- 7424810299

INDIA+91-9884350006

EMAILsales@pubrica.com

CONTACT US