ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING...

49
MODELING DECISIONS STRUCTURING DECISION ANALISA KEPUTUSAN

Transcript of ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING...

Page 1: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

MODELING DECISIONS

STRUCTURING DECISIONANALISA KEPUTUSAN

Page 2: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

PENDAHULUAN

Misalkan elemen-elemen dari permasalahankeputusan tersedia seperti:

Objectives dan decision context

Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

Alternatif untuk setiap keputusan

Kejadian tidak pasti

Mengetahui cara mengevaluasi consequences

SELANJUTNYA BAGAIMANA MENSTRUKTURKAN PERMASALAHAN KEPUTUSAN?

Page 3: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

PENDAHULUAN

STEP 1: Mengidentifikasi dan menstrukturkan value danobjectives

Mengidentifikasi means objectives dan fundamental objectives

Menentukan cara untuk mengukur pencapaian objectives

STEP 2 : Menstrukturkan elemen-elemen keputusan dalamsuatu framework yang logic

Strukturkan logic dan urutan waktu antar keputusan

Strukturkan logic antar kejadian tidak pasti

Strukturkan urutan waktu dari kejadian tidak pasti yang berhubungan dengan urutan keputusan

Gambarkan logic dengan menggunakan Influence Diagram or Decision Trees

Page 4: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

PENDAHULUAN

STEP 3: Buat lebih detail penstrukturan keputusan

Tampilkan definisi keputusan dan kejadian tidak pastidengan tepat (tidak ambiguous)

Tentukan distribusi probabilitas untuk kejadian tidakpasti dengan menggunakan kombinasi antara analisisdata dan expert judgement

Tentukan bagaimana concequences diukur dan rumuskantrade off antar objectives secara tepat (tidakambiguous)

Page 5: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 1: PENSTRUKTURAN VALUES

Dalam banyak kasus, keputusan ditentukan oleh sebuah single objective padahal sebenarnya terdiri dari multiple objectives yang konflik

Contoh: seorang manager ingin memaksimumkan profit (single objective) padahal pada saat yang sama manager jugamenginginkan untuk meminimumkan peluang untuk kehilangan uang(multi objectives)

Objective mudah diidentifikasi bila permasalahan keputusan hanyamemiliki single objective. Definisikan objective dengan cara yang benar dimana memerlukan pemikiran yang hati-hati

Penentuan objective belum tentu merupakan permasalahan yang simple

Page 6: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 1: CONTOH PENSTRUKTURAN VALUESMany business hire students for short-term assignment. Such jobsoften are called internships, and the employee – or intern – gets achance to see what a particular kind of job and a specific companyare like. Likewise, the company gets to try out a new employeewithout making a long-term commitment.

In this example, the fictional Peach Tree Consumer Product has anopening for summer intern. Working under the supervision of asenior employee in the marketing group, the intern would focusprimarily on the development of a market survey for certain of thecompany’s products. The problem is how to find an appropriateindividual to fill this slot. Where should the company go to locategood candidates, which ones should be interviewed, and on thebasis of what criteria should a particular candidate be choosen?

Bayangkan anda adalah manager yang ditugaskan untuk mencari“intern” yang sesuai untuk PeachTreee!!

Page 7: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 1: IDENTIFIKASI OBJECTIVES (PROSES KREATIF)

Page 8: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 1: FUNDAMENTAL DAN MEANS OBJECTIVES

Setelah diperoleh set objectives yang konsisten dengan decision context, langkah berikutnya memisahkan antara fundamental objectives dan means objectives

Langkah tersebut kritis karena untuk menunjukkan objectives yang penting karena objectives tersebut membantu mencapai objectives yang lain dan dapat menunjukkan sesuatu yang ingin dicapai

Contoh: waktu kerja yang pendek adalah objective yang penting, tetapi sebenarnya objective tersebut penting hanya karenaseseorang ingin meluangkan lebih banyak waktu untuk keluarganyaatau untuk mengejar aktivitas-aktivitas lain yang merupakanfundamental interest

Means objective : Minimize waktu bekerja

Fundamental objective : Maximize waktu untuk family

Page 9: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 1: FUNDAMENTAL DAN MEANS OBJECTIVES

Fundamental objectives diatur dalam hierarchi, dimana level paling tinggi merupakan general objectives dan level yang lebih rendahmenjelaskan elemen-elemen penting dari level yang lebih tinggi

Mean objectives diatur dalam networks

Penstrukturan hierarki fundamental objectives krusial untukmengembangkan suatu model multipe objective decision

Membedakan means dan fundamental objectives merupakan halpenting agar DM dapat menetapkan objective yang sesuai dalammodel keputusan

Means objectives lebih mudah diukur sebagai penggantifundamental objectives yang jauh lebih sulit diukur

Page 10: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 1: FUNDAMENTAL OBJECTIVES HIERARCHY

Maximize

Safety

Minimize

Minor Injuries

Minimize

Serious Injuries

Minimize

Loss of Life

Adults ChildrenAdults Children

a higher-level

fundamental objective

lower-level

fundamental

objectives yang

menjelaskan maksud

higher-level objective

level untuk memperluas hierarchy

Page 11: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 1: MEANS OBJECTIVES NETWORK

Maximize

Safety

Maximize Use of

Vehicle-Safety Features

Minimize

Accidents

Motivate Purchase of

Safety Features

on Vehicles

Maintain

Vehicles

Properly

Maximize

Driving Quality

Require Safety

Features

Educate Public

about Safety

Enforce

Traffic Laws

Have Reasonable

Traffic LawsMinimize Driving

under Influence of

Alcohol

Means objective dapat dihubungkan dengan beberapa objective, yang

menunjukkan bahwa means objectives membantu pencapaian objectives tersebut.

Contoh, “Have Reasonable Traffic Laws” berpengaruh terhadap “Maintain

Vehicle Property” dan “Maximize Driving Quality”

Page 12: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 1: FUNDAMENTAL AND MEANS OBJECTIVE

Pertanyaan-pertanyaan untuk mendapatkan mean-objectives networks dan fundamental-objectives hierarchies

Page 13: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 1: FUNDAMENTAL DAN MEANS OBJECTIVES FOR PEACHTEER

Maximize Survey

Quality

Minimize Survey

Cost

Maximize Quality and

Efficiency of Work

Maintain High

Enery Level

Assist Senior

Employee

Maximize Quality of

Work Environment

Try Out Prospective

Employee

Train Personnel

Develop Personnel and

Company Resources

Update Analytical

Techniques

Provide Real-World

Experience

Financial Aid

Community

Service

Choose Best Intern

Establish Link with

Local College

Maximize

Intern’s Ability

to Assist Senior

Employee

Maximize

Intern’s

Energy

Level

Maximize Intern’s

Ability to Teach

and Demonstrate

New Technique

Use Low-Cost

Intern

Page 14: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

Influence Diagram – satu objective

Venture

Succeeds

or Fails

Invest?Return on

Investment

Chance events

Consequences

(mathematical

calculation atau

constant value)

Decision

Page 15: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

Influence Diagram – Fundamental-Objective Hierarchy

Maximize Overall

Satisfaction

Invest in

Computer Industry

Return on

Investment

Invest?

Venture

Succeeds

or Fails

Return on

Investment

Computer

Industry

Growth

Overall

Satisfaction

Objective Hierarchy

Influence Diagram

Page 16: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

Influence Diagram

A

C

B

E

F

D

Relevance

H

I

G

Sequence

Suatu ID tidak pernah membentuk siklus

Interpretasi ID adalah mudah

Mengcreate ID adalah sulit

Page 17: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

The Basic Risky Decision

Bayangkan anda mempunyai $2000 untuk investasi dengan tujuan untukmendapatakan return setinggi-tingginya. Terdapat 2 alternatif yangada, yaitu: investasi ke bisnis dari seorang teman atau deposito di bankdengan bunga tetap. Investasi dalam bisnis maka return tergantungpada sukses atau tidaknya bisnis tersebut. Jika bisnis sukses akanmendapatkan return $3000 dan jika gagal maka $2000 akan hilang.Investasi pada deposito akan memberikan pendapatan $200

Investment

ChoiceReturn

Business

Result

Outcomes

Wild success

Flop

Alternatives

Savings

Business

Choice

Savings

Business

Result

Success

Flop

Success

Flop

Business

Final Cash

Position

2200

2200

5000

0

Page 18: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

Imperfect Information

Seorang manager pabrik menghadapimasalah produk cacat dan harusmenentukan tindakan yang harus diambil.Fundamental objectives dari manageradalah menyelesaikan permasalahandengan ongkos sekecil mungkin dan untukmenghindari tidak terlaksananya jadwalproduksi. Maintenance engineerditugaskan untuk melakukan pre-inspeksipada Mesin 3 yang diduga sebagaisumber permasalahan. Hasil pre-inspeksimemberikan beberapa indikasi apakahMesin 3 benar-benar yang menjadipenyebab (kepastiannya hanya bisadiperoleh melalui inspeksi yang teliti danpengujian yang mahal, dan tidak mungkindalam waktu yang singkat).

Manager’s

Decision

Return

Machine 3

OK?

Engineer’s

Report

ScheduleOverall

Performance

Manager mempunyai 2 alternatif;

pertama, mengganti Mesin 3 dan

kedua, operator secepatnya

mengganti dengan produk yang lain.

Alternatif kedua akan menyebabkan

pengunduran jadwal produksi namun

terhindar dari risiko mengganti Mesin

3 yang mungki tidak diperlukan

Page 19: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

Consequence

Page 20: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

Sequential Decisions

Concequence

Page 21: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

Net

Present

Value

Page 22: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

Introduce

Product?

CostRevenue

ProfitIntroduce

Product?

Units

Sold

Profit

Introduce

Product?

Fixed

Cost

Variable

Cost

Introduce

Product?

Units

Sold

Profit

Introduce

Product?

Fixed

Cost

Variable

Cost

Revenue Cost

Intermediate Calculation

Deterministic

node

Page 23: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

Building an Influence Diagram:

1. List the decisions

2. Draw seqence arcs between decisions

3. Identify the concequence node

4. Breakdown the consequence node using the fundamental-objective hieararchy

5. Draw relevance arcs from decision nodes to the intermediate calculation nodes

6. List all the uncertainty nodes

7. Draw the relevance arcs between uncertainty nodes

8. Draw the sequence arcs from uncertainty nodes to the decsion nodes

9. Draw relevance arcs from the decision nodes to the uncertainty nodes

10. Draw the relevance arcs from the uncertainty nodes to the intermediate calculation nodes

Page 24: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

CONTOH: TOXIC CHEMICALS AND THE EPA

Page 25: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

CONTOH: TOXIC CHEMICALS AND THE EPA

Usage

Decision

Economic

Value

Cancer

Cost

Net

Value

Step 1 – 5

Page 26: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

CONTOH: TOXIC CHEMICALS AND THE EPA

Usage

Decision

Survey

Economic

Value

Cancer

Cost

Net

Value

Laboratory

Test Exposure

Rate

Carcinogenic

Potential

Step 6 – 7

Page 27: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

CONTOH: TOXIC CHEMICALS AND THE EPA

Usage

Decision

Survey

Economic

Value

Cancer

Cost

Net

Value

Laboratory

Test Exposure

Rate

Carcinogenic

Potential

Step 9 – 10

Page 28: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

CONTOH: TES ANALYZE AND FIX (TAAF)

Page 29: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

CONTOH: MEMBUAT INFLUENCE DIAGRAM TAAF

Release 1? Release 2? Release 1?

Final Profit

Step 1 – 3

Page 30: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

CONTOH: MEMBUAT INFLUENCE DIAGRAM TAAF

Release 1? Release 2? Release 1?

Final Profit

Profit if

released

after 1

Cost of

Test 1 &

Redesign

Profit if

released

after 1

Cost of

Test 1 &

Redesign

Profit if

released

after 1

Step 4 – 5

Page 31: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

CONTOH: MEMBUAT INFLUENCE DIAGRAM TAAF

Release 1? Release 2? Release 1?

Final Profit

Profit if

released

after 1

Cost of

Test 1 &

Redesign

Profit if

released

after 1

Cost of

Test 1 &

Redesign

Profit if

released

after 1

Current

Reliability

Outcome

Test 1

Reliability

after Test 1

Outcome

Test 2

Reliability

after Test 2

Step 6 – 7

Page 32: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

CONTOH: MEMBUAT INFLUENCE DIAGRAM TAAF

Release 1? Release 2? Release 1?

Final Profit

Profit if

released

after 1

Cost of

Test 1 &

Redesign

Profit if

released

after 1

Cost of

Test 1 &

Redesign

Profit if

released

after 1

Current

Reliability

Outcome

Test 1

Reliability

after Test 1

Outcome

Test 2

Reliability

after Test 2

Step 8

Page 33: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

CONTOH: MEMBUAT INFLUENCE DIAGRAM TAAF

Release 1? Release 2? Release 1?

Final Profit

Profit if

released

after 1

Cost of

Test 1 &

Redesign

Profit if

released

after 1

Cost of

Test 1 &

Redesign

Profit if

released

after 1

Current

Reliability

Outcome

Test 1

Reliability

after Test 1

Outcome

Test 2

Reliability

after Test 2

Step 9 – 10

Page 34: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: Penstrukturan Keputusan

ID sangat baik dalam menampilkan struktur dasar keputusan, tetapi ID menyembunyikan banyak detail

Struktur decision tree:

– Keputusan kotak

– Chance event bulat

– Alternatif yang tersedia busur yang keluar dari “kotak”

– Outcome busur yang keluar dari “bulat”

– Concequence akhir dari pencabangan

DT “dibaca” mengalir dari kiri ke kanan, keputusan yang dibuat digambarkan pada kotak sebelah kiri

Setiap chance node harus mempunyai cabang yang dihubungkan dengan suatu set outcome mutually exclusive (only one of the outcomes can happen) dan collectively exhaustive (no other possibilities exist)

Page 35: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN KEPUTUSAN

Invest

Venture Succeeds

Do Not Invest

Venture Fails

Large Return on Investment

Funds Lost

“Typical” Return Earned on

Less Risky Investment

Keputusan

Alternatif

Chance eventsPossible outcome

Concequence

Page 36: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN KEPUTUSAN

System 1

System 2

System 3

System 4

System 5

Detection

Effectiveness

Time to

Implement

Passenger

AcceptanceCost

Base System

Concequence matrix

Page 37: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

Page 38: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: PENSTRUKTURAN ELEMEN-ELEMEN KEPUTUSAN

Page 39: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: Penstrukturan Elemen-elemen Keputusan

Decision tree

Page 40: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: Penstrukturan Elemen-elemen Keputusan

Decision tree

Page 41: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: Penstrukturan Elemen-elemen Keputusan

Decision tree

Page 42: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: Penstrukturan Elemen-elemen Keputusan

Decision tree

Page 43: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: Penstrukturan Elemen-elemen Keputusan

Decision tree

Page 44: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: Penstrukturan Elemen-elemen Keputusan

Decision tree

Page 45: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 2: Penstrukturan Elemen-elemen Keputusan

Decision tree

Page 46: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

INFLUENCE DIAGRAM VS DECISION TREE

Page 47: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 3: FILL IN THE DETAILS

1. Definisikan elemen-elemen dari model keputusansecara jelas

Contoh: Environmental Protection Agency

Fundamental objective: meminimumkan social cost of cancer.

Dalam incremental lives lost?

Dalam incremental kasus kanker?

Dalam incremental treatable kanker?

Uncertain events: rate of exposure

Jumlah orang yang terkena chemical per hari?

Tingkat debu partikel yang dapat dihirup?

Kontak kulit?

Page 48: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 3: FILL IN THE DETAILS

3. Mendefinisikan skala ukuran untuk fundamental objectives

Objectives diukur dalam atribut: dollars, hours, percentage

Page 49: ANALISA KEPUTUSAN STRUCTURING DECISIONradiasari.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2014/10/03-04-Modelling-Decision.pdf · Objectives dan decision context Immediate decision dan subsequent decision

STEP 3: FILL IN THE DETAILS