Post on 06-Mar-2023
Page 1 of 20
Title of Research Paper: Students’ Perceptions Regarding the Use of Process
Strategy for Oral Presentations in ESP
Authors 1. Mr. Mohammad Fareed Dar, Lecturer, Department of Humanities, NED University of
Engineering & Technology, Karachi.
2. Dr Sajida Zaki, Associate Professor, Department of Humanities, NED University of
Engineering & Technology, Karachi.
3. Dr Hina Hussain Kazmi, Associate Professor, Department of Education & Learning
Sciences, Iqra University Karachi
Research Journal Details
Title: English Language and Literary Forum,
Volume: 12, 2010. PP. 1-12
[Word count 3483 excluding abstract & references ]
Page 2 of 20
Students Perceptions Regarding the Use of Process Strategy for Oral
Presentations in ESP
Abstract Oral communication and presentation skills are the most demanding and crucial skills to
individuals, especially professionals; however, the ESL settings reveal these as deficiencies
in students who are acquiring tertiary education. The major factor responsible is the fact that
these skills are neither consciously nor systematically taught and learnt, despite the fact that
these courses are being essentially taught at all academic and professional programmes. This
paper presents a study that makes use of a systematic instructional strategy using process
approach enabling students to consciously focus all components of the presentation activity
from the planning to delivery stages thereby enhancing their presentation skills and ensuring
quality outputs. The empirical study was carried out a public sector professional university
with twenty seven participants who volunteered for the study. Following a systematic
implementation of the process strategy, the participants’ perceptions about the experience
and its impact were collected using a questionnaire which drew evidence that stated that the
students found the strategy beneficial in reducing their anxiety and fear, and enhancing their
interest and overall
performance.
Introduction
“English Language has come a long way from being the native language establishing the
identity of a nation, to its status raised to that of lingua franca for many countries to maintain
social and economic links. With globalization and technological revolution its status is
further elated to the status of international means of communication for the residents of this
global village”. (Zaki, 2007, p.1). The non-native language users have outnumbered the
Page 3 of 20
native speakers (Crystal 1997, Graddol 1997), and English has become the dominant
language of science (Ammon, 2001) and the language of international communication. The
choice and ability to use English can affect one’s understanding and judgment while
approaching academic material especially of the scientific and technical nature (Tonkin &
Reagan 2003); language proficiency and professional know- how are highly interlinked and
the language proficiency will be an extremely useful tool in working in environments having
multicultural workforce ( Jaatinen, 2006); and facts like these have serious implications for
English Language Teaching (ELT) pedagogy (Jenkins 2002). The scope of teaching and
learning English language has increased immensely owing to the impact language
proficiency makes on the personal and professional lives; and today learners are learning
English as they require using it as a tool for education, work and life (Hull, 1997).
Consequently, it is desirable that the educators examine and adjust teaching programmes and
pedagogical materials in order to meet better the changing realities that occur within societies
in personal or professional spheres of its people (Byrnes 2006).
Language and communication skills learning is a priority matter in professional education
and training and this can be established on the evidence from the medical profession which
reveals “there is a growing acceptance of the need to teach and assess communication skills
in medical schools” (Makoul & Schofield, 1999) especially oral communication and
presentation skills, since oral communication plays a central role in clinical care (Haber &
Lingard, 2004) and the eight recommendations of the International Conference on Teaching
Communication strongly make a case for essential language and communication skills
development especially the recommendation number “ (5)there should be a planned and
Page 4 of 20
coherent framework for communication skills teaching and (6) that students’ ability to
achieve communication tasks should be assessed directly” (Makoul & Schofield, 1999).
Likewise, the engineering discipline is resonating under the calls for reinventing engineering
education where it is strongly felt that engineers today need much more than mere technical
skills (Crawley et.al 2007) and they should be able to interact with people effectively
(National Academy of Engineering, 2009) for which they require strong language and oral
communication skills. Dr Hassan Al Basri (2010) in his key note speech at the Fifth
International Forum on Engineering Education shared the results of a nation- wide study
conducted by the alumni of engineering universities in Malaysia to help academia in
identifying key areas for improvement at engineering education and of the identified areas
“communication and interpersonal skills” topped the list which was merely a re-endorsement
on the Malaysian Employers Federation (2004) report that stated that one of the key skills
employers want to see at the time of recruitment is oral communication, particularly
presentation skill.
The global trends have also pervaded the local context, where English is the official language
and is also, to a large extent, enjoying the status of the second language since, “It is language
of government, business technology and law in Pakistan”. (Malik, 1996, p.11). Language
proficiency and communicative competence is required by every professional, initially
during their academic and professional education and later in their careers; also the
employers sought and demand language and communication skills while recruiting
graduates. Hence, English Language competence is directly linked with the employability
and growth opportunities of an individual as stated by Kelli Fisher (2006) “A person in the
Page 5 of 20
non-English speaking world who is proficient in the English language is granted more
opportunities and has access to better jobs and higher salaries.” It has now become a well
recognized fact that all professionals in Pakistan: doctors, engineers, teachers, entrepreneurs
etc. need to have good command of English language. Importance of English language
increases when these professionals join a multinational organization or want to go abroad for
job or further education. In many cases these professionals can compete internationally in
their respective fields, but lack of English proficiency becomes a barrier as pointed out that
“A graduate of today lacks competence in written and spoken English” Malik (1996:13). This
observation about the local context has already echoed globally that Second Language
Learners of English language fail to develop academic proficiency which will enable them to
undertake activities in their academic settings and later train them for the real professional
world. Realizing the far reaching impact of language and communication skills, all academic
programmes at tertiary level education has English or Communications skills course as an
essential component. Considering the importance of English language in higher education
and the declining quality of English language teaching in Higher Education Institutes (HEIs),
Higher Education Commission (HEC) initiated English Language Teaching Reforms Project
(ELTR) in 2004 with the objective of improving the language teaching practices across
Pakistan so our graduates and professionals can compete in the global arena with
professionals from other regions. Efforts are being made at several tiers right through
teachers to policy making quarters towards development of effective instructional
methodology and materials that can facilitate the development of crucial language and
communications skills among students.
Study Focus
Page 6 of 20
This paper shares a study about the use of a planned instructional strategy to improve
students’ oral presentation skills during an ESP course at a public sector engineering
university with students pursuing undergraduate degree. The study began with the
implementation of an instructional technique for teaching presentations skills to students
using process approach which involved providing well planned and meaningful inputs at
various stages of the planning for an improved and effective output. The paper shares
empirical data collected from students regarding their reactions towards the experience and
the way it impacted them. The primary objectives of the study were: (1) to explore the
students previous oral presentation experiences in order to know whether or not they were
taught oral presentations formally and systematically by the use of some standard
instructional technique, (2) to identify students’ reactions towards the use of process strategy
in developing presentation skills and to capture the benefits that students perceived they
received owing to the use of this strategy.
The paper can be classified under the theme of “learner strategy training” which Brown H
Douglas (1991) identified as one of the four major themes in ESOL Teaching and Research
which was an important concern in ESP courses. Presentations and oral communication skills
are not just required for employment and professional purposes in professional career
settings, rather they are needed at all times by everybody pursuing higher education as part of
their regular class presentation, oral examination, proposal or thesis defense. If oral
communication is in second or foreign language, the difficulty level particularly in formal
oral communication increases. The situation is further aggravated if learners are not trained
for formal oral communication in academic institutions. Broadly, speaking can be divided
into two categories, informal and formal. The informal speaking generally involves no
Page 7 of 20
planned thinking or practice for e.g. social discussions among friends, family members etc.;
however, the formal speaking is drastically different since it is well planned, researched and
even practiced such as job interviews, official meetings, presentations, oral reports etc.
(Kassim & Ali 2010) believe that speaking or oral communication should be given more
importance as to other skills because they think it is key skill looked for by employers. As
per study conducted by Malik (1996) Pakistani college students also prioritized spoken
English as their number one need in English. Guffy (2003), also, states that speaking skills
often play an important role in successful career of business people. According to Lesiker
and Flatley (2002) for many people formal oral communication is the most difficult but at the
same time they believe that speaking can be improved by learning speaking techniques and
putting them into practice. Locker (1998) considers that a good presentation is more than just
a good delivery: it also involves developing a strategy that fits your audience and purpose,
having good content, and organizing material effectively. Kerry Shephard (2005) is of the
view that a fixed external model of a good presentation cannot be fixed. Haber & Lingard
(2004) strongly felt that by making explicit the tacit rules of presentations, these can be
improved and that while teaching and learning oral communication and presentations context
should be focused more than the content. Krizan et al (2008) believe that amount of time
one spends on giving oral presentations varies widely depending on one’s position in an
organization but they believe that effective oral presentations are “a thread common to many
careers”. Thus, it can be concluded that presentation skills are to be essentially developed
with teacher and learner making use of a planned strategy.
The results and conclusions of this study may be used by students and teachers at all similar
HEIs who are undertaking mandatory courses in language and communication. Th
Page 8 of 20
Process Approach for Presentations
Though Process approach (Raimes, 1983, Zamel 1982, 1983) is one of the main line
approaches in teaching and learning of writing skills, but it can be used effectively for
presentations and oral communication skills too. The process approach for writing offers
systematic steps like planning , rehearsing, writing content, revising and feedback which
comfortably enable the students to achieve their written outputs smoothly and successfully.
The approach is very much flexible and not fixed, process steps can be moulded according to
the needs (Murray,1985); however, most commonly used steps in process approach as
suggested by Campbell (1998) are planning, gathering information, drafting, revising and
editing.
This study is built on the assumption that students’ effective presentation is dependent on the
process that consists of similar steps as those of writing; hence, process approach can be used
for teaching and learning of presentation skills. The process approach that was used to teach
students presentation skills during this study is elaborated in Fig 1 below. The diagram
elaborates the five stages along with the teacher and students’ activities at each stage of the
process.
Diagram.1 Five- Step Process Approach used for Oral Presentations
Page 9 of 20
Major Benefits of Using the Process Approach
Students generally find themselves under tremendous anxiety when confronted with a
presentation assignment. The basic advantage of using this strategy is that it breaks down a
formidable undertaking to a doable task which students find helpful in targeting their goal.
Also, this technique brings students to centre stage where they are enjoying “learner’s
autonomy” fully since the learner’s intention or purpose becomes of paramount concern”
Tompkins (1990), the teacher becomes a facilitator or guide providing the required inputs
which allows students to gradually move on with the planning and preparation and gain
confidence by the instructor’s timely and frequent guidance. This chance for improvement
and correction at different stages of the presentation task instead of being penalized at the last
Page 10 of 20
minute is one the greatest merit of using this approach. By dividing the presentation task into
five stages, the strategy allows opportunity to the student and the teacher to pay equal focus
to different aspects of the presentation like content, organization and delivery.
Methodology
Participants and context
The study was carried out with a group of 27 students who volunteered for the study. These
students were part of a class who was enrolled in a communication skills course offered in
third year of the undergraduate engineering programme at a public university. The study
could not be planned with the entire intact group enrolled for the course since the class size
of 70 students did not allow sufficient time to capture the five stages of the study with the
rigour it was planned by the investigator. Also, the students’ personal interest and
involvement in the study ensured that the process strategy was implemented as planned, and
the students mental sets did not affect the study, which was a threat had the study been
carried out with the entire group as a compulsion. The participants’ demographic profile was
quite uniform since they were pursuing same academic programme and had similar previous
academic experiences. The course and the study was carried out by the same individual (first
author) hence, it was ensured that these students were not getting any other guidance or
instruction in presentation skills in their regular classes.
Data Collection
The study commenced with the instruction of process strategy (described in Fig.1) to
participants for formal oral presentations, they were taken through each stage of the process
and finally the students delivered their presentations. After the presentations were delivered,
a questionnaire was administered to the students’ to gather their perceptions on the use of
Page 11 of 20
process approach for presentation skills training. The questionnaire was finalized after expert
review and pilot testing.
The questionnaire comprised two sections, first part collected information about participants’
previous practices related with presentations; since students in different subjects in their first
two years at the ongoing degree programme had delivered presentations. This section
collected information regarding the number of times participants presented before, the time
they were allowed for preparation, the freedom they had to select the topics for the
presentations, and the instruction they were provided on presentation preparation and
delivery. The second section of the questionnaire collected participants’ perceptions about
the use of process approach for presentations and to what extent they felt the strategy was
helpful in enabling them to accomplish the task at each stage of the process. The data was
collected in both quantitative and qualitative form to develop deeper and better understanding
of the impact of the employed strategy.
Data Analyses & Findings
Data was analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively, for quantitative part descriptive
statistics was used. The item-wise analysis of the data collection tool is presented below that
sums the qualitative and quantitative data findings:
Students’ Perceptions about their past Presentation experiences
Table. 1 Prior Frequency of Presentations
Never Once Twice Three times Four times Five times or more
7% 43% 19% 20% 4% 7%
The participants’ have made presentations before as part of their projects or during a course.
The students who had made presentations more than once were found out to be the group
Page 12 of 20
leaders on different engineering projects, hence they presented their work on behalf of their
groups and the purpose of the presentation was to convey the technical information instead
exposition or persuasion.
Table. 2 Freedom of Topic Selection in Prior Presentations
Topics Assigned Topics Chosen
50% 50%
It was found out that in both the cases (student selecting topic and topic assigned to them)
there was no evidence of any conscious or thoughtful effort or discussion between the student
or teacher while selecting or assigning the topic.
Table. 3 Time Allowed for Preparation
One day Less than a
week
One week Two weeks Three
weeks
Four weeks
4% 4% 48% 24% 4% 16%
The time that was allowed for preparation to the students was not planned for any specific
tasks, rather they were assigned a date when they should come prepared for the presentation.
Table.4 Provision of Formal Instruction
Instruction/Guidelines Provided
Not at All
Provided
To some extent
Provided
Completely
For Preparation 78% 22% 0%
For Delivery 78% 22% 0%
The students who responded positively to the provision of formal instruction when probed
further about the nature of instruction provided revealed that it was mostly related to the
timings, venue, equipment to be used (OHP, multimedia) and dressing.
Page 13 of 20
Students’ Perceptions on the Use of Process Strategy for Presentations
The second part of the questionnaire gathered participants’ perceptions about the usefulness
of process approach for presentations for which a five point rating scale was used. The
participants’ were asked to rate the benefit of using process approach at each stage and the
responses are presented below:
Table. 5 Participants’ Responses on the usefulness of Process Approach at each
stage of the presentation
To what extent you found the
following helpful in your
presentation
Not at All
(1)
Little
(2)
Adequate
(3)
High
(4)
Very High
(5)
Freedom to choose the topic
0 2 7 9 9
Collection of relevant material
0 2 5 12 8
Selection of relevant material (from
collected material)
0 1 9 11 6
Organization of material (in
continuous writing)
0 1 4 9 13
Rehearsal of organized material
0 0 4 1 22
Participants also provided qualitative data against open ended questions which were framed
around each stage of the process strategy while planning presentations. The question – wise
responses are presented below:
Table. 6 Students’ Perceptions about Stage One: Freedom to Select Topic
How did Freedom to decide the topic help you in your presentation?
Increased the speaker’s and audience’s interest, enhanced confidence, allowed freedom to
present on relevant and beneficial topics, developed interest and involvement in the
presentation task
Page 14 of 20
Table. 7 Students’ Perceptions about Stage Two: Collection of Relevant Material
How did Collection of relevant material help you in your presentation?
Improved the quality and quantity of the content and information, increased their
awareness and extended their knowledge on the topic, introduced new dimensions of the
topic, enabled reshaping the topic better, and stimulated thoughts and creativity.
Table. 8 Students’ Perceptions about Stage Three: Selection of Relevant Material
How did Selection of relevant material (from the collected material) help you in
your presentation?
In including relevant points according to the audiences needs and level, in achieving
conciseness and managing time well, and in avoiding repetition and bolstering
confidence.
Table. 9 Students’ Perceptions about Stage Four: Organization of Material
How did Organization of material (in continuous writing) help you in your
presentation?
Developing well structured and coherent presentation, enabled better sequence of
contents, increasing audience attention and understanding, made presentation content
easier to be remembered, enhanced confidence and reduced anxiety and allowed control
over the task.
Table. 10 Students’ Perceptions about Stage Five: Rehearsal
How did Practice/Rehearsal (in front of mirror or with the help of audio and video
recording) of organized material help you in your presentation?
Improved both verbal and non verbal presentation aspects, enhanced confidence, allowed
opportunity for improvement and correction, enabled them to face audience with greater
Page 15 of 20
confidence, increased fluency, and allowed effective time handling during presentation.
6. Conclusions
The study attempted to explore the impact of student and teacher using a systematic approach
for developing presentation skills. In this regard, the process strategy was used where the
instructor facilitated the students at five different stages of the presentation preparation and
delivery. The meaningful input thorough out the process was seen to improve the final
product i.e. the presentation. The review of the background literature and the analysis of
students’ perceptions-data, the study draws the following important conclusions:
Presentation and oral communication skills are essentially needed for academic and
professional activities and they are extremely influential in an individual’s growth
and progress.
Globally, professional quarters are insisting on academia to train graduates with
proficient oral communication skills.
It was found out that oral presentations are not given due importance. The gathered
data revealed that the participants had passed minimum fourteen years of formal
academic education, but still some of them had never made presentations and those
who had the prior presentation experience reported that they had received no formal
systematic instruction.
The process strategy that was implemented in this study was found out to be
beneficial. The systematic instructor input at different stages of the preparation
enabled students to plan and deliver presentation more effectively. Hence, the process
approach can be used to teach presentation skills.
Page 16 of 20
The students’ perceptions about the use of Process Approach for presentation skills
indicated the strategy to be beneficial in many ways like: developing confidence and
interest, increasing understanding and grip on the topic, giving new dimensions to
ideas and creativity, providing freedom to select and express, preparing audience
oriented presentation, incorporating precise and relevant information, and improving
both verbal and nonverbal communication.
The major steps of the process approach targeted an important milestone of the entire
presentation teaching learning activity, and the students’ perceptions proved the five
stages’ distinct efforts as extremely beneficial in gradually accomplishing the
anxiety–driven presentation task.
Process strategy proved beneficial in helping students; hence it may be applied in
other similar situations so that instructors and learners in ESP and ESL contexts can
approach teaching learning of oral communication and presentation skills more
meaningfully. The stages within the process approach can be adjusted according to
the learners and contextual needs.
Students should be allowed freedom to choose the topics of their presentation so that
their interest and involvement is stimulated. Also sufficient and realistic time should
be allowed for planning and rehearsals and students must be facilitated at each stage.
Further studies are required to capture more information about the teaching learning
of oral communication in the local context especially in ESP settings to draw better
conclusions.
Page 17 of 20
References:
Ammon, U. (Eds). (2001). The dominance of English as a language of Science: effects of
other languages and language communities. Mouton de Gruyter: New York.
Brown, H Douglas (1991). TESOL at Twenty-Five: What are the Issues? TESOL
Quarterly, 25 (2), pp.245-260
Byrnes, H. (2006). Perspectives. The Modern Language Journal, 90, ii, (244-266)
Campbell, C. (1998). Teaching second-language writing: Interacting with text. Newbury:
Heinle &Heinle
Crawley, E. F., Maimqvist, J., Ostlund, S., and Brodeur, D. R. (2007). Rethinking
Engineering Education. The CDIO Approach. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC,
NY, USA.
Page 18 of 20
Crystal, D. 1997. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Cummins, J. and Davison, C. (Eds). (2007). International Handbook of English
Language Teaching, 1. Springer Science + Business Media,LLC.
Government of Pakistan (2001). The Education Sector Reform. Islamabad:
Ministry of Education.
Graddol, D. 1997. The future of English. London: The British Council.
Gregory Makoul and Theo Schofield (1999). Communication Teaching and Assessment
in Medical Education: an international consensus statement. Patient Education &
Counselling: An International Journal for Communication in Healthcare. 37 (2).pp 191-
195
Guffy, M.E.(2003). Business Communication Process and Product, 4th
edition, United
States of America: South-Western
Haber, R. J. and Lingard, L. A. (2001), Learning Oral Presentation Skills. Journal of
General Internal Medicine, 16: 308–314
Hassan Al Basri. (2010). Malaysia in Washington Accord: Assuring Quality in
Engineering Education. Keynote speech at Fifth International Forum on Engineering
Education (IFEE2010) – Quality. Globalization and Local Relevance Jointly with the
European SDPROMO II Conference Sustainable Development in Higher Education, 23-
25 November 2010, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Higher Education Commission Pakistan, English Language Teaching Reforms
Project.(2011). Retrieved on January 25,2011, from
Page 19 of 20
http://www.hec.gov.pk/insidehec/divisions/qali/eltr/pages/nationalcommitteeonenglish.as
px
Hull, G. (Ed.). (1997). Changing Work Changing Workers: Critical perspectives on
Language, Literacy and skills. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Jaatinen, R. (2006). Autobiographical reflexive approach to teaching and learning a
foreign language. Learning Languages, learning Life-skills. Springer, US
Jenkins, Jennifer, (2002). A Sociolinguistically Based, Empirically Researched
Pronunciation Syllabus for English as an International Language, Applied Linguistics 23
(1), 83-103.
Kassim, H. and Ali, F. (2004) English communication events and skills needed at the
work place. Feedback from the industry, English for Specific Purposes (2010), doi:
10.1016/j.esp.2009.10.002
Kelli F. (2006), English As a Global Language, TESOL Training Course Article, date of
post 2006-11-14 downloaded from www.tesolonline.com retrieved on 2011-2-8
Krizan, A.C., Merrier P., Logan J. and Williams K. (2008) Business Communication,7th
edition, Canada: Thomson South-Western
Lesiker, R. V., and Flatley, M. E.(2002). Basic Business Communication: Skills for
Empowering the Internet Generation, 9th
edition, New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Locker, K. O. (1998) Business and Administrative Communication, 4th
edition, New
York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Malaysian Employers Federation (2004).Facing the realities of the world of work
[PowerPoint Slides] Retrieved on June 25,2010from <http://www.epu.gov.my/seminars>
Page 20 of 20
Malik, F.J. (1996). The Teaching of English in Pakistan: A Study in Teacher Education.
Lahore: Vanguard Books.
Murry, D. (1985). A Writer Teaches Writing. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in Teaching Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
National Academy of Engineering (2009). Developing Metrics for Assessing Engineering
Instruction: What Gets measured is what gets improved. Report from the Steering
Committee for Evaluating Instructional Scholarship in Engineering; National Academies
Press.
Shephard, K. (2005). Presenting at Confrences, Seminars & Meetings. New Delhi:
Response Books ( A division of Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd).
Tompkins, G. E. (1990). Teaching Writing Balancing Process and Product. Columbus:
Merrill Publishing Company.
Tomkin, H. and Geagan T.G. (Eds) (2003). Language in the 21st century. John
Benjamins Publishing Company.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Faculty Leadership for Writing Initiative.(2011).
Common Words used in the Teaching of Writing, Retrieved on February 12, 2011, from
http://flwi.unl.edu/resources/glossary.html.
Zaki, S. (2007). English for Specific Purposes: Implications in Medical Education.
Journal of the College of Physicians & Surgeons Pakistan, 17 (1),1-2
Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case studies.
TESOL Quarterly 17, 165-189
Zamel, V. (1982). The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly 16, 195-211