Post on 20-Mar-2023
This article was downloaded by: [188.117.111.129]On: 30 October 2014, At: 22:29Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
International Geology ReviewPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tigr20
Early Carnian anoxic event as recorded in the southernTethyan margin, Tunisia: an overviewMohamed Souaa
a Entreprise Tunisienne d’Activités Pétrolières, Immeuble Zouila, 1001 Tunis, TunisiaPublished online: 28 Oct 2014.
To cite this article: Mohamed Soua (2014) Early Carnian anoxic event as recorded in the southern Tethyan margin, Tunisia: anoverview, International Geology Review, 56:15, 1884-1905, DOI: 10.1080/00206814.2014.967315
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2014.967315
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of theContent. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon andshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Early Carnian anoxic event as recorded in the southern Tethyan margin, Tunisia: an overview
Mohamed Soua*
Entreprise Tunisienne d’Activités Pétrolières, Immeuble Zouila, 1001 Tunis, Tunisia
(Received 22 July 2014; accepted 15 September 2014)
Considerable attention has been given to the Carnian (Late Triassic) Pluvial and Reingraben events associated with organic-rich shale accumulation in the Germanic basin, Alps, southern Appenines as well as in northwestern Tethyan margins. Lessinterest has been shown to the southern Tethyan portion represented by the northern margin of Africa, including Tunisia.Tunisian basins represented by the Tellian domain, Tunisian trough, the ‘Dorsale’, and the North–South Axis (NOSA)belong to the southern Tethyan margin, where northern and central areas record the early Carnian anoxic event within anextensive carbonate platform. This short-lived (~2 million year) period of anoxia ranges within the Aonoides to Austriacumammonite zones, and corresponds in Tunisia generally to intermediate to shallow water environments marked by organic-rich black limestone, dolomite, and shale. Interestingly, toward the south, the dysaerobic conditions in the Jeffara–southernDahar basin appear to have prevailed locally also in the early Carnian. Here we review evidence of early Carnian anoxia inTunisia based on the analysis of more than 17 Triassic sections and wireline logs from several petroleum exploration wellspenetrating the black dolomites, limestones, and shales. In addition, biostratigraphic and complete geochemical reviewshave been undertaken from published papers and unpublished internal reports to better assess this important and promisinghydrocarbon source interval.
Keywords: early Carnian anoxic event; Carnian Pluvial Event (CPE); black shale; Late Triassic; Tunisia
1. Introduction
1.1. Triassic tectonic setting
The Carnian stage (Late Triassic) witnessed several globaltectonic events that coincidedwith the break-up of the Pangeasupercontinent (Ziegler 1988; Veevers 1994, 2004; Withjacket al. 1998; Golonka and Ford 2000; Golonka 2002). Theseincluded the closure of the Palaeotethys and the collision ofthe drifting Cimmerian plates with Cathaysia, resulting in theIndosinian orogeny (Golonka 2007) (Figure 1). Beginning inPermian–Triassic time, the Cimmerian fragments driftednorthward from Gondwana toward Laurasia to close thePalaeotethys (Şengör 1984; Zonenshain et al. 1990;Sengör and Natalin 1996; Golonka 2004) as the NeotethysOcean opened behind them (Figure 1) (Burollet et al. 1978;Jongsma et al. 1985; Turki 1985; Morgan et al. 1998;Guiraud 1998; Touati and Rodgers 1998; Grasso et al.1999; Soussi 2000; Soua and Tribovillard 2007). Thenorthward drifting of Cimmerian fragments was the con-sequence of Carboniferous–earliest Permian rifting, whichaffected the northern Gondwana margin. According toseveral authors (e.g. Lawver and Gahagan 1993; Scoteseand Langford 1995; Golonka 2007), the existence of sub-duction zones during the Permian–Triassic period resultedin the so-called Pangean Rim of Fire. Alternatively, duringthe Early Triassic, the western Pangean margin was char-acterized by separation of North America and Gondwana
(western Africa and western Europe), which is believed tohave continued as the Late Triassic extensional phase(Bryan et al. 1977). In addition, some authors (e.g.Macdonald et al. 2003) stress the Late Triassic initiationof continental extension in isolated areas such as SouthAmerica. Triassic evaporate-related basalts and tuffs(ophites) in Tunisia have been reported by Kurtz (1983),who considered them as tholeiitic continental basalts(according to their Ti-enrichment trend, K2O, Rb, and Srcontents) with slightly transitional alkaline character. Herelated these ophites to the widespread basaltic volcanismassociated with the break-up of Pangea; since then, con-tinental tholeiitic basaltic activity related to this episodehas been reported from the Argana valley of the Moroccanwestern High Atlas (Beauchamp 1988; Aït Chayeb et al.1998; Tourani et al. 1998) and in the Khemisset basin ofthe Moroccan Meseta (e.g. Et-Touhami 1994). Additionaloccurrences are reported from the eastern USA, Guinea,Mali, and Mauritania (Weigand and Ragland 1970;Biju-Duval et al. 1977; Bertrand and Coffrant 1977;Laubscher and Bernoulli 1977; Manspeizer et al. 1978;Bertrand et al. 1982).
1.2. Triassic sedimentary facies
The break-up of Pangaea as outlined above continuedthrough the Norian stage (Late Triassic; Ziegler 1982;
*Email: elmohology@yahoo.frPresent address: Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
International Geology Review, 2014Vol. 56, No. 15, 1884–1905, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2014.967315
© 2014 Taylor & Francis
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
Veevers 1994, 2004; Withjack et al. 1998; Golonka andFord 2000; Golonka 2002, 2007). During the EarlyTriassic, the separation of North America from Africacontinued through the Late Triassic extensional phaseduring which continental red beds were deposited inevolving continental rifts (Olsen 1997; Withjack et al.1998; Laville et al. 2004). During the immediately pre-ceeding Carnian stage, in the central and western HighAtlas (Morocco), red fluvial braided conglomerates andplated sandstones were deposited in WSW–ENE-trendingrift systems (Petit and Beauchamp 1986; Benaouiss1990; Benaouiss et al. 1996; Tourani et al. 1998;Courel et al. 2003). This is true also for clastic deposits
that prevailed over the whole area between NorthAmerica and Europe (Golonka and Ford 2000). TheCarnian continental rift system is represented by redbeds and fluvial sequences, which are characteristic ofearly stage rift grabens (Ziegler 1988; Withjack et al.1998; Kutek 2001; Golonka 2007). To the north, andabout the same time (Middle–Late Triassic), the CentralEuropean Triassic basins witnessed deposition of threedifferent facies: (1) Buntsandstein, essentially siliciclas-tic; (2) Muschelkalk, essentially marine carbonates; and(3) Keuper, essentially mixed siliciclastics, carbonates,and evaporites (Köppen and Carter 2000; Kutek 2001;Golonka 2007).
SicilyTurkey
Apulia
Arabia
Mad
agas
car
India
Lhasa
Australia
South America
North
America
Iberia
Tisa
PANGEA
Laurasia
Greenland
Tunisia
PANTHALASSA
OCEAN
Oceanic spreading center and transform faults
Subduction zone
Thrust fault
Normal fault,
Transform fault
Mountain ranges
Landmass
Carbonate with possible OM
Shallow sea carbonatesDeep ocean basinTunisia
Sicily
TurkeyApulia
Arabia
Mad
ag
ascar
India
Iberia
Tisa
Laurasia
Tunisia
Africa
Southern
America
N Am
erica
EuropePALAEOTETHYS
NEOTETHYS
Cimmerian platesNEOTETHYS
PALAEOTETHYS
0
30N
0
30S
0
Cimmeria
n plates
A
B
EXPLANATION
Limit of Carbonate depositionCarbonate deposition with possible organic-rich sedimentation
Plates position as of Late Triassic (Carnian at 224 Ma)
Figure 1. Palaeogeographical map for the Carnian at 224 Ma (Late Triassic). (A) Global reconstruction. (B) Late Triassic regionalstructural, palaeoenvironment, and lithofacies map of the future Mediterranean region; asterisk: Tunisia (adapted from Golonka 2007,modified).
International Geology Review 1885
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
However, comparison with the Carnian global palaeo-geographical map shows that an extensive area ofcarbonate platforms characterized the Neotethys andPalaeotethys margins (Dercourt et al. 1993; Sengör andNatalin 1996; Golonka 2007) (Figure 1B), extending as faras Arabia (Alsharhan and Magara 1994). Carnian sedi-mentation was influenced by monsoonal activity (Parrish1999) at the same time as enhanced extension related tothe break-up of Pangea (Golonka 2007). Enhanced volca-nic activity (Kurtz 1983), which increased CO2 emissioninto the atmosphere (Hornung et al. 2007), is thought to beresponsible for the well-known Carnian Pluvial Event(CPE), which was caused by enhanced rainfall and riverrun-off through the shelves as a consequence of the inten-sification of the hydrological cycle due to global warming(Hornung et al. 2007). As a consequence of these tectonicand climatic changes, organic-rich black shale accumula-tion occurred in the Tethyan realm during the earlyCarnian.
1.3. Brief history of previous investigations
Most of the previous investigations on Tunisian Triassicrocks have been structural studies focused on diapirs andthrusts (e.g. Perthuisot 1981; Turki 1985). The Carniancarbonate shelf and its organic richness were noted bySoussi et al. (1996). Kamoun et al. (2001) published apalaeogeographic review of the Triassic system ofTunisia. The organic-rich Carnian environment of deposi-tion and its sedimentation model have not been evaluatedin the context of the surrounding Mediterranean geologi-cal data.
This paper reviews and focuses on the accumulation oforganic-rich strata within the extensive early Carnian car-bonate platform in Tunisia besides enhancing our under-standing of the role of anoxic deposits in generatingpetroleum systems in Tunisia and adjoining regions onthe northern Gondwana margin.
2. Geological background
2.1. Regional setting
During Early Carnian time, Tunisia was situated in thenorthern margin of Gondwana. This time was character-ized by the intensification of the break-up of the Pangeasupercontinent (Figure 1), which began in Permian-Triassic time when the Cimmerian plates dislocatedfrom the northern African margins and began to driftnorthward toward Laurasia to close the Palaeotethys(Celâl Şengör 1984; Zonenshain et al. 1990; Sengörand Natalin 1996; Golonka 2004) and consequentlyopen the Neotethys Ocean (Burollet et al. 1978;Jongsma et al. 1985; Turki 1985; Morgan et al. 1998;
Guiraud 1998; Touati and Rodgers 1998; Grasso et al.1999; Soua and Tribovillard 2007). This approximatelyN–S to NE–SW motion was accompanied by the forma-tion of E–W to NW–SE normal faults associated withhalf-graben systems formed on the N-dipping slope at thesouthern Tethyan passive margin. This passive marginevolution did not include a panoply of facies transectand important thickness variation during the earlyCarnian (Figures 2 and 3). However, large carbonateplatforms developed along the Tunisian shelf, includingorganic-rich and organic-lean black to dark grey lime-stones and dolostones, and even laminated black shales.This reflects the regional palaeogeographical depositionalpattern of the Neotethys and Palaeotethys margins(Figure 1B; Dercourt et al. 1993; Philip et al. 1996;Sengör and Natalin 1996; Philip 2003; Golonka 2007).These carbonates grade progressively to clastic andmixed clastic as well as to evaporitic series in theSaharan Atlas of Algeria toward the east (Baird 1963;Achab 1970; Busson 1971; Reyre 1973; Mami 1980,1989; Mami and Bourmouche 1994; Aït Ouali andNedjari 1994; Askri et al. 1995; Aït Salem 1992;Courel et al. 2003) and then grade into clastic red bedstoward the central and western High Atlas of Morocco(Cousminer and Manspeizer 1977; Mattis 1977; Biron1982; Salvan 1984; El Youssi 1986; Beauchamp 1988;Manspeizer 1988; Benaouiss 1990; Benaouiss et al.1996; Tourani et al. 1998; Oujidi et al. 2000; Courelet al. 2003).
2.2. Geological domains and Triassic lithostratigraphybackground
Detailed lithostratigraphic description of Triassic rocks ingeneral and Carnian sections in Tunisia has been providedby several authors (e.g. Peybernes et al. 1993; Soussi et al.1996; Kamoun et al. 2001; Mehdi et al. 2009). Generally,the Carnian carbonates are described within four structuraldomains from northern to southern Tunisia (Figure 4). Tothe north, the main structures are represented by theTelliandomain or unit (including the Ichkeul–Haireshstructures), where the Triassic rocks are characterizedmainly by metamorphic and dolomitized carbonates gen-erally assigned to the Bechateur and Ras El KoraneFormation (see later in the text, Table 1; Kamoun et al.2001), and by the Northern Atlas structures, which arerepresented in this area by the ‘Dorsale’ range andTeboursouk unit, characterized mostly by thrusts andTriassic extrusive structures (Salaj 1978; Perthuisot 1981;Turki 1985; Chandoul et al. 1993; Peybernes et al. 1993).In the central part of the country, near the ‘North–SouthAxis’ (NOSA) (Figure 4), the Triassic is dominated byevaporites. The area is affected by halokinesis structures
1886 M. Soua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
alternating generally with continuous stratigraphic series(Burollet 1956; Ben Ferjani et al. 1990; Chandoul et al.1993; Soussi et al. 1996; Mehdi et al. 2009). Southwardalong the North–South Axis, the Chott domain, which isrelated geologically to the southern Gulf of Gabes (Figure4), is represented by a transitional Triassic series (Mzoughiet al. 1994; Buratti et al. 2012).
Finally, farther south, in the so-called SaharanPlatform and the Dahar–Jeffara domain, the Triassic seriescomprises siliciclastic-dominated beds, represented bycontinuous sandstone strata (Kamoun et al. 2001;Arfaoui and Montacer 2004).
3. Material and methods
The review of the early Carnian anoxia occurrence inTunisia is based mainly on an analysis of more than 17Tunisian Triassic sections and wireline logs from severalpetroleum exploration wells penetrating black dolomite,limestone, and shale levels (Figure 2). Gamma-ray ampli-tudes, spontaneous potential, and resistivity logs havebeen analysed in different studies, which will be citedwithin the text. An isopach map has been compiled forthe early Carnian (Figure 3) based on this dataset andother available data (e.g. Burollet 1973; Salaj 1978; Ben
Figure 2. Facies distribution of the early Carnian Black Limestones–Dolostones unit of the Rhéouis Formation and age-equivalent unitsin Tunisia and related organic-richness (TOC), maturity (Tmax), depth, and thickness; facies zones modified after Kamoun et al. (2001);Transect A–A′ in the Gulf of Tunis refers to the regional seismic section of Figure 6; section and well codes are shown in Table 1.
International Geology Review 1887
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
Ferjani et al. 1990; Chandoul et al. 1993; Mzoughi et al.1994; Soussi et al. 1998; Kamoun et al. 2001; Mehdi et al.2009; Buratti et al. 2012). In addition, a palaeogeographi-cal map of the petroleum source rock has been constructedto evaluate the controlling mechanisms on the depositionof the laminated black limestone levels. Additionally,fieldwork was carried out in central (Jebel Rhéouis) andsouthern (Jebel Sidi Toui) Tunisian basins where Triassicblack shales crop out in order to collect more information.Geochemical exploration tools are represented by totalorganic carbon (TOC) and pyrolysis and have beenachieved earlier, namely by Soussi et al. (1998) as wellas Arfaoui and Montacer (2004). These data were
compiled with biostratigraphy and palynology, and refer-ences will be cited within the text.
4. Early Carnian anoxic event
4.1. Distribution and characteristics of the organic-richCarnian strata
In central Tunisia, Bedir (1995) used seismic stratigraphicdata to conclude that Carnian sediments in the subsurfaceof the Sidi Aich–Souinia area (Sidi Ali Ben Aoun) andBen Kheir (BK-1) structures (Figure 5) consisted of alarge laminated carbonate platform, which is termed
Figure 3. Thickness map of the early Carnian Black Limestones–Dolostones of the Rhéouis Formation and age-equivalent units inTunisia. Illustrated isopachs are simplified and short-distance thickness; thickness and codes of sections/wells are shown in Table 1.
1888 M. Soua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
(T3). The general facies trend was complicated by a com-plex tectonic palaeorelief configuration, which resulted intilted blocks individualizing deep half-graben systemstoward the north (Turki 1985; Bedir 1995; Soussi et al.1996; Touati and Rodgers 1998; Kamoun et al. 2001;
Bedir et al. 2001; Bouaziz et al. 2002). This configurationresults in slight lateral thickness and facies variations ofthe early Carnian strata (Figure 3). Within the BK-1 wellstructure, Scallon (1980) and Gueinn (1980) describedlaminated organic-lean black dolomites alternating with
Figure 4. Simplified geological sketch map of Tunisia showing the Triassic extrusive structures and main structural domains discussedin the text.
International Geology Review 1889
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
Table1.
Abb
reviationcodes,thickn
ess,litho
logy,totalorganiccarbon
(TOC,%)intervals,andreferences
ofTun
isianearlyCarnian
sections/wellsdiscussedin
thetext.
Cod
eSectio
n/well
Thickness
Lith
olog
yTOC(%
)Coo
rdinates
References
Bch
Bechateur
30m
White
limestone
–37
°18ʹ16
.67ʺ
N9°44
ʹ23.35ʺE
Salaj
andBajanik
(197
2);Biely
andRakus
(197
2);Kam
ounet
al.(200
1)Rk
Ras
ElKorane
–White
limestone
–37
°20ʹ05
.23ʺ
N9°40
ʹ12.17ʺE
Crampo
n(197
1);Kam
ounet
al.(200
1)UTQ-1
Utiq
ue-1
30m
Black
doloston
e,shale
0.13
–0.24
37°01ʹ57
.90ʺ
N10
°03ʹ43
.70ʺ
ESmaoui
(199
6)ROD-1
Raoued-1
20m
Black
doloston
e,shale
0.24
–2.86
37°10ʹ26
.66ʺ
N10
°25ʹ53
.25ʺ
EBou
faresandMekki
(198
4);Sou
a(200
7);
Sou
aandSmaoui
(200
8)CB-101
Cap
Bon-101
30m
Black
limestone,dolomites,shale
0.3–
2.1
36°37ʹ14
.00ʺ
N10
°40ʹ13
.00ʺ
ECou
ture
andMarti(196
5);Bon
nefous
(196
7);Burollet(197
3);Tou
atiet
al.
(199
5);Salaj
andMzoug
hi(199
7)Bl
JebelBaouala
6–8m
Black
limestone
–36
°53ʹ25
.72ʺ
N9°46
ʹ40.33ʺE
Perthuisot(198
1);Adil(199
3);Fou
rnet
etal.(199
4);Kam
ounet
al.(200
1)Ln
JebelLansarine
2m
Black
limestone
–36
°44ʹ59
.68ʺ
N9°37
ʹ51.88ʺE
Perthuisot(198
1);Kam
ounet
al.(200
1)Fk
JebelFkirine
––
–36
°12ʹ16
.47ʺ
N9°56
ʹ02.00ʺE
Salaj
andStranik
(197
0);Kam
ounet
al.
(200
1)Ch
JebelCheid
Verythin
––
36°20ʹ22
.57ʺ
N9°17
ʹ45.63ʺE
Perthuisot(198
1)KEA-5
Kou
diat
ElAlfa
Over50
mBlack
limestone,do
lomites,shale
0.6
35°30ʹ37
.44ʺ
N09
°16ʹ29
.56ʺ
EKhessibiandPacaud(196
8);Mehdi
etal.
(200
9)Rhs
JebelRhéou
is30
mBlack
limestone,do
lomites,shale
0.3–
7.5
34°55ʹ58
.16ʺ
N9°39
ʹ41.76ʺE
Burollet(195
6);Salaj
(197
8);Sou
ssiet
al.
(199
8);20
01);Kam
ounet
al.(200
1);
Mehdi
etal.(200
9),thiswork
BK-1
Belkh
eir-1
20m
Black
limestone,do
lomites,shale
0.37
–0.57
34°19ʹ25
.00ʺ
N09
°29ʹ44
.00ʺ
EScallo
n(198
0);Gueinn(198
0);Bedir
(199
5)DE-1
Degla-1
26m
Black
limestone,do
lomites,shale
0.1–
2.3
34°01ʹ55
.23ʺ
N10
°49ʹ43
.47ʺ
EMzoug
hiet
al.(199
2;19
94);Ha(200
9)DJM
-1Jerba-Mellita-1
20m
Black
limestone,do
lomites,shale
0.2–
0.89
33°51ʹ47
.20ʺ
N10
°46ʹ43
.66ʺ
EMzoug
hiet
al.(199
2;19
94);Burattiet
al.
(201
2St
JebelSidiTou
i8–
10m
Black
dolomites,shale,
sand
ston
e0.1–
332
°41ʹ08
.00ʺ
N11°15ʹ23
.50ʺ
EGlin
tzbo
eckel(195
6);Salaj
(196
9);Ben
Ferjani
etal.(199
0);Arfaoui
and
Mon
tacer(200
4),thiswork
1890 M. Soua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
black to dark shale and marls (over 20 m) with TOC notexceeding 0.6% (Table 1, Figure 2). The stratigraphiccalibration has been subject to palynological investigationby Gueinn (1980), who described at 3812 m level an earlyCarnian palynomorph association dominated byTriadispora sp., ?Concavisporites sp., which could indi-cate a marine environment (Mostler and Scheuring 1974;Roghi et al. 2010) compared with the above associations.This is in good agreement with the seismic stratigraphicinterpretation of Bedir (1995).
Organic-rich early Carnian strata occur in many placesin northeastern and central Tunisia (Figure 2; Table 1; e.g.Utique, Gulf of Tunis, Cap Bon, North–South Axis) andare grouped into the Black Limestones–Dolostones levelof the Rhéouis Formation (Figure 5), which has beendefined by Burollet (1956). Equivalent terms are groupedin the Bechateur Formation (Kamoun et al. 2001), whichexhibit organic-poor facies in the Bechateur quarry (Salajand Bajanik 1972; Biely and Rakus 1972), or grouped inthe Mekraneb Formation in the Jeffara–Dahar area insouthern Tunisia (Bouaziz 1986) (Figures 4 and 5) andfinally grouped in the lower ‘Trias carbonate’ or AziziaFormation in the Saharan platform by petroleum geolo-gists. The thickness distribution of the Black Limestones–Dolostones level in Tunisia is illustrated in Figure 3(compiled from a host of references, e.g. Burollet 1956;Glintzboeckel 1956; Bonnefous 1967; Crampon 1971;Salaj and Bajanik 1972; Biely and Rakus 1972; Salaj1978; Perthuisot 1981; Ben Ferjani et al. 1990; Mzoughiet al. 1992; Adil 1993; Peybernes et al. 1993; Touati et al.1995; Bedir 1995; Soussi et al. 1998, 2001; Kamoun et al.2001; Arfaoui and Montacer 2004; Mehdi et al. 2009;Buratti et al. 2012).
The regional distribution of the five main early Carniancarbonate facies types is shown in Figure 2, which alsodistinguishes an organic-rich and an organic-poor BlackLimestones–Dolostones facies trends and white to yellow
carbonates. The organic-rich early Carnian deposits exist infour areas, being dolomites, limestones, or mixed litholo-gies (shale, limestone, dolomite), namely in the northeast(UTQ-1, ROD-1, and CB-101 wells), north-central Tunisia(Ln, Bl sections; KEA-5 well), central Tunisia (Rhs section,BK-1 well), central offshore Tunisia (the Gulf of Gabes:DE-1, DJM-1 wells), and exceptionally in southern Tunisia(Dahar-Jeffara, Jebel Sidi Toui) (see Figure 2 for location;Figure 5; Table 1). Unfortunately several neighbouringwells did not reach the Late Triassic strata (such as NA-101 in Central Tunisia and ZB-1 in the northern Chottsbasin, see Figure 2 for location). Rarely available well andoutcrop data confirm the organic-rich provinces of Soussiet al. (1998); however, the exact boundaries still remainunclear, especially for the Gulf of Tunis (Figure 2) whereROD-1 well recorded TOC values up to 2.86% (Figure 2;Table 1), Central Tunisia (and Eastern Algeria), Gulf ofHammamet (Pelagian block), and the neighbouring JebelRhéouis area, due to the non-availability of well data.However, geophysical evidence of the early Carnian blackshale distribution is shown in Figure 6 (A–A′ section),which exhibits black shale reflectors within possible half-graben systems and bordering normal faults. This NE–SWregional seismic line is located in the Gulf of Tunis (seeFigure 2 for location of seismic line and generated crosssection).
A comparison with the palaeogeographic map (Figure 2)suggests that the distribution of the organic-rich BlackLimestones–Dolostones level is restricted to medium to shal-low water depth representing possible impingement of anoxygen minimum zone (OMZ) onto the northern margin ofAfrica (Figure 7), which may record the Carnian anoxicevent documented within the southern Apennines, Pobasin, southern Alps (Gorno Formation in centralLombardy [organic-rich lower part], Cassian Dolomites[organic-rich lagoonal series], Cassiano Formation[organic-rich shale and limestone succession], and Calcare
230
240
228
237
241
Tuvalian
JulianCordevolian
Longobardian
FassanianLad
inia
nC
arn
ian
Mid
dle
Late
Tri
assic
Southern Tunisa
JeffaraKirchaou-Sidi Toui(BMT-1, St-3 wells)
Dahar-Tebaga Jerba-Gulf ofGabes (DJM-1, DE-1 wells)
Central Tunisia
Gafsa(BK-1 well)
North-South Axis(Jebel Rhéouis)
Sbiba-Kodiat El Halfa (KEA-5 well) Jebel Fkirine Jebel Cheid,
Baouala-LansarineIchkeul - Hairech
Bechateur-Ras El Korane
Gulf of tunis-Cap Bon-Utique(ROD-1, CB-101,UTQ-1)
Northern Tunisia
Northern Atlas Tellian
Ras
Ham
ia
Myophoria Lst
Kirchaou
Sidi Stout UnconformityMekraneb
Touareg
Rehach
Mhira
Kef El Aneba
Tebaga,
Malaab high
Myophoria Lst
Unité 4
Unité 5
T2
T3
Uni
té 3
Rhé
ouis
Black Lst
Lower Siltstones
Lower Gypsum
MiddleGypsum
Yellow LstUpper Siltstones
Black dolomites
Hairech
Black dolomites and Lst
Bec
hate
ur
Hiatus
Hiatus Hiatus
Gulf of GabesTriassic System
Ladinian – Carnian
236
234
232
238
Figure 5. Lithostratigraphic and chronostratigraphic reconstruction of the Ladinian–Carnian time span in different basins of Tunisiadiscussed in the text (Tellian units, Tunisian trough, Dorsale, North–South Axis and the Chott basin, Jeffara-Dahar, etc.) (modified fromKamoun et al. 2001). Black bands represent organic-rich interval. Note that carbonates are dominating in the northern portion of thecountry and that no deposition has been recorded in the Tebaga–Malaab high in southern Tunisia (hiatus).
International Geology Review 1891
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
del Predil [organic-rich basinal succession]; Stefani andBurchell 1993), and Germanic basin within the RaiblGroup (Hornung et al. 2007).
The Black Limestones–Dolostones level is a few tens ofmeters thick (2 to 30 m, Table 1; Figures 2 and 3) in the‘Dorsale’, the NOSA, Gulf of Tunis, and Cap Bon areas witha maximum thickness of over 50 m recorded by Mehdi et al.(2009) in KEA-5 in Central Tunisia (Figure 6). In the
northern Jebel Rhéouis (Figure 2), Oued El Bhima, andOued El Forka localities, the lower part of the RhéouisFormation is represented by micritic fine-grained grey todark limestone with a somewhat coarser texture interbeddedwith finely laminated black dolomites and black shales(20 m–30 m). Generally, the Black Limestones–Dolostoneslevel consists of a regular alternation of dark-coloured shalesand laminated carbonates and sublithographic black and
ROD-1NW SE
Triassic
CretaceousJurassic
Pliocene to recentL. Miocene-Oligocene-EoceneOligocene
Sandstones
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Pre-Triassic rocks
MGT-1GMT-1CAR-1ROD-1RAJA-1
OligoceneEocene-Palaeocene
Miocene
Triassic
Triassic
NW SE
10 km
approximate position of the early Carnian Black limestones and
black shale level
(projected)
MEDITERRANIAN SEA
10 km
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
TW
T (
ms)
A
B
Figure 6. Regional geoseismic section in the Gulf of Tunis: Early Triassic half-graben systems controlling the deposition of earlyCarnian strata on the Tunisian shelf in the present Gulf of Tunis. Note the Triassic structural style. (A) Regional N–S seismic line in theGulf of Tunis with projected wells, (B) interpreted seismic line. The position of the early Carnian strata is only approximated. Forlocation, see Figures 2 and 3. Interpretation is based mainly on the existing well data and on the NW–SE regional seismic section.
Tebaga – Malaab High
Sea level
Permian successionMekraneb
Jebel
Sidi Toui
Gulf of Gabes
DE-1, DJM-1
Unit 5 T3
BK-1
NS Axis
(Jebel Rhéouis)
Kodiat El Alfa
(KEA-5)
Jebel Fkirine
(Dorsale)
Jebel Cheid
Jebel Baouala-
Lansarine
Cap Bon, Gulf Of Tunis, Utique(CB-101, ROD-1, UTQ-1)
Bechateur, Ras Korane
Hairech, IchkeulBlack
limesto
ne
NWSE
NWSE
NESW
Carnian Pluvial event
and monsoonal circulation system
Oxygen minimum zone expansion
Early Triassic and palaeozoic rocks
Monsoonal circulation system
Figure 7. Proposed depositional model for the early Carnian organic-rich sedimentation, in the Tunisian shelf, which assumeimpingement of an OMZ. Organic-rich early Carnian strata are deposited within half-graben systems, organic-lean strata may occurbeneath the OMZ. Note that this model compiles the regional structural framework (enhanced distensional movements) associated withthe regional pluvial event (increased riverine influx, enhanced run-off, as well as high nutrition). In addition, probable increased humidityrelated to enhanced CO2-emission associated with tholeiitic volcanic activity (based partly on Kurtz 1983; Simms and Ruffell 1989;Barrett 1998; Lüning et al. 2004; Brumsack 2006; Soua and Tribovillard 2007; Hornung et al. 2007).
1892 M. Soua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
greyish limestones and marls with mean TOC values of up to3% (Soussi et al. 1996; p. 262) (Figure 2). This sequenceoverlies generally bioclastic beds (gastropods, echinoderms)interbedded with radiolarian-bearing shale levels and stro-matolitic dolomites. A single 7.5% of TOC value wasreported by Soussi et al. (1998) from the Oued El Forka(northern Jebel Rhéouis). The vertical distribution of lime-stone versus marl in the different localities depends on theposition of the palaeoshelf/slope (Figure 7). Generally therewas more carbonate deposition in proximal settings (Rhs,CB-101, UTQ-1) and contrarily it becomes marl-dominatedin distal settings (DE-1, DJM-1). Particularly, in the Rhssection and the surrounding area, Soussi et al. (1998) notedthat the TOC values in calcareous and laminated beds rich inbrachiopods (~2 m thick) are locally higher than in thesurrounding marl/carbonate alternations and varyingbetween 0.3% and 3% of TOC (Figure 8).
The TOC ranges vary significantly in different local-ities (Figure 2). Typical ranges observed include (1)spiky profile as well as sudden increases and decreasesof values with significantly higher range of TOC withinthe early Carnian interval in the type section of JebelRhéouis, (2) good TOC potential represented by intervalsranging between 0.2% and 3% (e.g. ROD-1, CB-101,DE-1, and Jebel Sidi Toui), (3) poor TOC intervals ran-ging between 0.2% and 0.6% (e.g. BK-1, DJM-1, KEA-5), and (4) very poor TOC content between 0.1% and0.25% (e.g. UTQ-1, which flowed in turn over 96% ofCO2) (Figure 2; Table 1). A close inspection of theRhéouis spiky TOC pattern (Figure 8) in combinationwith typical alternations of dark shales, organic-richlimestone, and dolomites with light beds highlights thesignificance of anoxic and dysaerobic environmentscycles during early Carnian deposition.
0 842 6
2000
0 250
Lagenella martiniTuvalian
Enzonalasporites vigens
Cor
devo
lian
- Ju
lian
Cor
devo
lian
- Ju
lian
APIGamma Ray TOC (%)
Base of organic-richness event
Top of organic-richness event
MFS
Ladi
nian
5200
5300
Kodiat El Alfa
(KEA-5 Well)
Jebel Rheouis
(Oued El Bhima section)
Cap Bon
(CB-101 Well)
EXPLANATION
Cor
devo
lian
- Ju
lian
0 180APIGamma Ray
MFS
Top of organic-richness event
Base of organic-richness event
5100
5000
Ear
ly C
arni
an
Bla
ck L
imes
tone
Mid
dle
Gyp
sum
Organic-rich dolomitic limestone alternating with darrk grey to black shale levels
Tuva
lian
Tuva
lian
Lower Gypsum (Tr1)
Lower Siltstone (Tr2)
Black Limestone (Tr3)
Middle Gypsum (Tr4)
Yellow Dolomites (Tr5)
Dolimite
Anhydrite, gypsum
Salt, gypsum, anhydrite
Limestone
Alternation dolomiteand shale
Siltstone
Black limestone, dolomites and shales
Bla
ck
lim
es
ton
es
600
20
700
800
40
60
80
100
Bla
ck
do
lom
ite
s
Patinasporites densus, Partitisporites novimundanus, P. maljawkinae, Pseudoenzo-nalasporites summus, Lagenella martini, Camero-sporites secatus
P. densus, P. summus,Vallasporites ignacii
Julia
n -
Cor
devo
lian
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
0 150
Gamma RayAPI
Ear
ly C
arni
an
Bla
ck li
mes
tone
/dol
omite
Mid
dle
Gyp
sum
Tran
sgre
ssiv
e sy
stem
s tr
act (
TS
T)
Hig
hsta
nd s
yste
ms
trac
t (H
ST
)
TS
mfs
?
Gulf of Tunis
(ROD-1 Well)
MFS
MFS
MFS
Figure 8. Distribution of organic-rich early Carnian strata in four Tunisian sections in relation with available palynologic data andcharacteristic TOC as well as Gamma ray (GR) peaks (compiled from Couture and Marti 1965; Khessibi and Pacaud 1968; Soussi et al.1998; Soua 2007; Mehdi et al. 2009).
International Geology Review 1893
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
The low TOC values characterizing some earlyCarnian sections/wells (Figure 2) could be explained bythe absence of the basal part of the early Carnian interval(typically organic-rich in the Oued El Bhima and Oued ElForka of the Rhéouis-type section) where the silty level(Tr2 of Burollet 1956) that directly underlies the organic-rich level is reportedly absent in several sections through-out the North–South Axis region and exceptionally withinthe western and eastern flanks of Jebel Rhéouis (Burolletand Dumestre 1952; Salaj and Stranik 1970; Ben Ferjaniet al. 1990; Chandoul et al. 1993; Soussi et al. 1996;Kamoun et al. 1998) and in northcentral as well as north-eastern Tunisia (Bonnefous 1967; Crampon 1971; Salajand Bajanik 1972; Biely and Rakus 1972; Burollet 1973;Boufares and Mekki 1984; Touati et al. 1995; Smaoui1996; Salaj and Mzoughi 1997). This explains to someextent the direct deposition of the organic-rich black stro-matolitic dolomites interbedded with black shales and few
gypsum levels on the lower gypsum unit. In addition, thevalues of TOC of less than 1% could be linked to theorganically leaner location of the logged sections/wells orprobably they were deposited beneath the OMZ (Figure 7;Barrett 1998; Soua and Tribovillard 2007). Figure 2 andTable 1 show good TOC potential for the Carnianrecorded in the Gulf of Tunis (Figure 9; Soua 2007). Infact, the Triassic section has been encountered only in theROD-1 well with a thickness of 2616 m. It has beendivided into three units (Boufares and Mekki 1984) ofLadinian to late Carnian age (Soua 2007, and referencestherein). The first unit (basal unit) is 1781 m of grey toblack sublithographic limestone alternating with greyanhydrite, black indurated shales, and indurated grey todark dolostones. The second unit is composed of blackdolostone interbedded with few anhydritic and blacksandy bioclastic limestone levels and black shales, withthe presence of siltstone levels. Finally, the third unit is an
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
997
1924
Eq.
Por
to F
arin
a
Mid
dle/
Upp
er P
lioce
ne
328
Age Fm Lithology(m) (m)
10161089
145914951535
Ain
Gra
bE
l Har
ia
Tri
assi
cL
angh
ian
Lat
e P
aleo
cene
Y
pres
ian
Early Carnian Black limestone/dolomite
Rhéouis Formation
Middle Gypsum
Yellow dolomites
Julia
n -
Cor
devo
lian
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
0 150
Gamma Ray(API)
Ear
ly C
arni
an
Rhé
ouis
- B
lack
lim
esto
ne -
M
iddl
e G
ypsu
m -
Y
ello
w d
olom
ites
Raoued -1 well
Figure 9. Lithology of the Raoued-1 well section and the organic-rich and calcareous early Carnian succession plotted against relatedGamma ray signature (after Soua 2007).
1894 M. Soua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
anhydrite, dolomite, and shale sequence. Black dolostonesfrom 1555 m revealed TOC of up to 2.86% (Figure 2;Table 1). The early Carnian is revealed to be more carbo-naceous in Gulf of Tunis when compared with the NOSAsections and could be similar to the section described bySmaoui (1996) in the UTQ-1 well. The little difference canbe considered in the organic richness of the early Carnian(Table 1).
4.2. Biostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy
The organic-rich ‘Black Limestones–Dolostones’ levelof the Rhéouis Formation was deposited during theEarly Carnian Anoxic Event (Aonoides to Austriacumzones), but this Black Limestone facies could in someregions continue up to the late Carnian (e.g. in ROD-1,Soua 2007). This reflects probably local upwelling con-ditions during black shale deposition. Burollet (1956)originally attributed the black limestones and shales inthe Jebel Rhéouis area (section Rhs) to the ‘Muschelkalk’based on collected oysters and venerids bivalves(reported also in Salaj 1978); however, this stratigraphicinterpretation was later re-evaluated by Soussi et al.
(2001) who by means of palynology and geochemistrydemonstrated that this level is characterized by apalynomorph assemblage formed by Patinasporitesdensus, Partitisporites novimundanus, P. maljawkinae,Pseudoenzonalasporites summus, Lagenella martini, andCamerosporites secatus, which indicates early Carnian age(Julian). Alternatively, Kamoun et al. (2001) assigned tothis organic-rich level a Ladinian to Carnian age on thebasis of benthic formaminiferal assemblage (F3 a/b) con-stituted essentially of (1) F3a, Triadodiscus eomesozoicus,Lamelliconus sp., Endotrianella wirzi, and Acicularia sp.assemblage (Mekraneb dolomite, southern Tunisia), (2)F3b, Aulotortus ex. gr. Praegaschei, T. eomesozoicus, andAcicularia sp. assemblage (black limestones, centralTunisia) (Figure 10).
Similarly, Castany and Degalier (1956) attributed theTriassic series outcropping in Koudiat El Alfa (KEA, seeFigure 2 for location) to the ‘Keuper’; then Kamoun et al.(1998), by means of benthic foraminiferal assemblages,assigned a Carnian age to the section. The neighbouringwell (KEA-5) has been subject to a palynological investi-gation by Khessibi and Pacaud (1968), who assigned aMiddle to Late Triassic age to the succession and noted
Carn
ian
Julian
Tuvalian
Aonoides
Austriacum
Dilleri
Subbullatus
Anatropites
AonAonides
Triadicum
"Oedipus"
Dilleri
Crasseplicatus
Subbullatus
Plinii
Italicus
F3
F4
Duplicisporites continuus
Aul
ispo
rites
-A
ratr
ispo
rites
Acm
e Z
one
Aulisporites astigmosus
Aul
ispo
rites
-Ara
tris
porit
es A
cme
Zon
e
Dup
licis
porit
es c
ontin
uus
asse
mbl
age
(Lat
e Ju
lian)
(
Aus
trot
rach
ycer
as a
ustr
iacu
s S
ubzo
ne)
3000
2750
2321
2511
Uni
ts 4
to 5
Uni
ts 1
to 7
Uni
ts 2
to 4
DJM-1 DE-1
MFS
5200
5300
Jebel Rheouis CB-101
EXPLANATION
Cor
devo
lian
- Ju
lian
MFS
5100
5000
Ear
ly C
arni
an
Bla
ck L
imes
tone
Mid
dle
Gyp
sum
Tuva
lian
Dolimite
Anhydrite, gypsum
Salt, gypsum, anhydrite
Limestone
Alternation dolomiteand shale
Siltstone
Black limestone, dolomites and shales
20
40
60
80
100
Bla
ck
do
lom
ite
s
Julia
n -
Cor
devo
lian
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
Ear
ly C
arni
an
Bla
ck li
mes
tone
/dol
omite
Mid
dle
Gyp
sum
mfs
Lagenella martiniTuvalian
Enzonalasporites vigens
Cor
devo
lian
- Ju
lian
Ladi
nian
KEA-5
600
700
800
P. densus, P. summus,Vallasporites ignacii
?
ROD-1
Cor
devo
lian
- Ju
lian
Tuva
lian
Lower Gypsum (Tr1)
Lower Siltstone (Tr2)
Black Limestone (Tr3)
Middle Gypsum (Tr4)
Yellow Dolomites (Tr5)
Patinasporites densus, Partitisporites novimundanus, P. maljawkinae, Pseudoenzo-nalasporites summus, Lagenella martini, Camero-sporites secatus
Aul
ispo
rites
-Ara
tris
porit
es A
cme
Zon
e
Triassic system Ammonites BF Palynoflora
Buratti et al. (2012) Mzoughi et al. (1994) Soussi et al. (1998) Mehdi et al. (2009) Soua (2007)
Figure 10. Biostratigraphic calibration of the organic-rich strata on the basis of palynology and benthic foraminifera. BF: benthicforaminifera (zones of Peybernes et al. 1993; Kamoun et al. 1998, 2001); palynoflora (zones of Mehdi et al. 2009; Buratti et al. 2012).
International Geology Review 1895
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
that typical palynomorphs occur in the lower part of theseries. Later, Mehdi et al. (2009) noted that the lowersuccession is characterized by the occurrence of lateLadinian–Carnian sporomorphs (Praecirculina granifer,C. secatus, Enzonalasporites vigens, Duplicisporites gran-ulates, and P. novimundanus) associated with typicalCarnian palynomoprphs such as P. densus, P. summus,and Vallasporites ignacii, L. martini, and Aulisporitesastigmosus, confirming the palynologic investigation ofKhessibi and Pacaud (1968). This age calibration is con-strained by the fact that L. martinii is restricted to theJulian–early Tuvalian interval (Litwin et al. 1991;Hardenbol et al. 1998; Roghi 2004) and A. astigmosusgenerally belongs to early Carnian assemblages (Hochuli1998).
In addition, the early Carnian of the ‘Dorsale’ area ismarked by alternating marls, limestones, and laminatedblack shales containing bioclastic debris, radiolarians,ostracoda, and scarce benthic foraminifera (Kamounet al. 2001). Biely and Rakus (1972) and Salaj (1978)described several unconformities marked by angular dis-cordances within the Triassic of the area.
In Jebel Baouala–Lansarine (Bl, Ln sections), Kamounet al. (2001) described very thin (from 2 to 8 m) massiveblack dolomites and attributed early Carnian age on thebasis of Tunethyris punica. So the age of these BlackLimestones–Dolostones is now well documented as earlyCarnian. However, earlier, Adil (1993) as well as Adil andAlouani (1996) considered these black dolomites in JebelBaouala as being lower Liassic without providing anybiostratigraphical argument, although they are overlainunconformably by an Upper Triassic sandstone sequence.The fossiliferous pelecypod-bearing dolomites have beendocumented also by Calzada et al. (1994). The distributionand extension of these black carbonates revealed more thandescribed earlier by Burollet (1973) since they have beencharacterized in the west of the Dorsale (Kamoun et al.2001) and in north-central (e.g. Ch, Bl, Ln sections) as wellas in northeastern Tunisia (e.g. ROD-1 well) (Perthuisot1981; Kamoun et al. 2001; Soua 2007) (see Table 1 forsection and well codes). Along the North–South Axis, theseblack limestones are very well documented, especially inthe type section Jebel Rhéouis (Rhs section). They arereported as early Carnian black shales (Soussi et al. 2001;Kamoun et al. 2001; Mehdi et al. 2009).
According to Scallon (1980) and Gueinn (1980), euxi-nic conditions in the Ben Kheir area (see Figure 2 forlocation) were diachronous at both the base and the top.They distinguished a typical facies of Carnian black shaleand shaly limestone based on the palynomorph assemblageconstituted of Classopolis torosus, Duplicisporites cf. gran-ulates, Alisporites sp. Classopollis spp., ?Spheripollenitessubgranulatus, Triadispora sp., and ?Concavisporites sp. inthe interval between 3532 and 3812 m. The sedimentationis represented by an organic-rich and condensed euxinic
section, suggesting the development of restricted circulationwithin ‘mini-basins’ (Bedir 1995). This is confirmed byseismic studies over the same basin by Bedir (1995), whodefined laminated and well-stratified Carnian carbonatestermed T3 (Figure 5). Generally speaking, the earlyCarnian black shales contain dwarfed and impoverishedbenthonic fauna as well as pelycepods, lamellibrachs, gas-tropods, brachiopods, and ammonites (Burollet 1956;Calzada et al. 1994; Soussi et al. 1996; Kamoun et al.,1998). However, the dysaerobic conditions in the Gulf ofGabes (DE-1, DJM-1 wells, e.g. Mzoughi et al. 1994; Ha2009; Buratti et al. 2012) appear to have begun at thesame time (Mzoughi et al. 1994) but seem to have persistedmuch longer through the Carnian here than in centralTunisia (Buratti et al. 2012). Especially within this area(Figure 2, for location), the oxygen depletion is assumedto have prevailed during almost all of the Carnian, whereasit was limited to the early Carnian in Central Tunisia only afew hundred kilometres away. This is inferred from thebiostratigraphic investigation on the DE-1 well made byMzoughi et al. (1994), who defined Units 4 and 5 (Figure5). These units are characterized by the distribution oftypical Carnian species represented by Camerosporitessecatus, Triadispora sp., Voltziaceaesporites heteromorpha,Aratrisporitespalettae, and Calamospora tener withinshale, black dolomite, and shaly limestone succession.
The minimum duration of the organic-rich facies in theinvestigated Triassic sections (e.g. Rhs, DE-1, DJM-1,KEA-5, BK-1 ROD-1) includes the whole Aulisporitesastigmosus assemblage and the Lagenella martini assem-blage of Roghi et al. (2010) (Figure 10). Soussi et al.(2001) denoted the first occurrence of Vallasporites igna-cii, Granuloperculatipollis rudis, and Patinasporites den-sus in the basal part of the organic-rich Carnian sedimentsfrom the Rhs section at 227.40 Ma (Hardenbol et al.1998). Alternatively toward the northeast, in the KodiatEl Alfa (KAE-5 well), situated a few kilometres from theRhs section, Mehdi et al. (2009) denoted the lastappearance of Gliscopollis Meyeriana (at 226.07 Ma),Aulisporites astigmosus, and Lagenella martini (at224.74 Ma) in the upper part of the black limestone-levelequivalent. The same palynological scheme has beenpresented in the Gulf of Gabes (DE-1 and DJM-1 wells)by Mzoughi et al. (1994) and Buratti et al. (2012).This reasoning implies an estimated duration of ~2 millionyears. Toward the northeast, in the Gulf of Tunis, theCarnian section from the ROD-1 well yielded benthicforaminiferal assemblage composed of Glomospira sinen-sis, Glomospirella vulgaris, Triadodiscus eomesozoicus,Endotriadella wirzi, Ammodiscus parapriscus, Aulototuspraegaschei, and ostracods (Simeonella sp.; Figure 10).The whole Triassic section in the ROD-1 has beenassigned to the Ladinian–Carnian stage.
The onset of deposition of the black limestone level ofthe Rhéouis Formation generally coincides with the base of
1896 M. Soua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
the early Carnian Transgressive Systems Tract (TST) (Haqet al. 1987; Vail 1988; Peybernes et al. 1993; Chandoulet al. 1993; Hardenbol et al. 1998; Soussi et al. 2001;Kamoun et al. 2001) of a major third-order Tethyan eustaticsea level (Haq et al. 1987; Vail 1987; Hardenbol et al.1998). A similar sequence stratigraphic interpretation waspresented by Soussi et al. (1996). Particularly in the Rhssection, the sequence boundary (SB) is confused with thetransgressive surface (TS), probably due to an underlyingdiscontinuity (Kamoun et al. 1998).
To correlate the TST we used the gamma ray (GR) andthe organic carbon potential (TOC) patterns of the KEA-5,CB-101, and ROD-1 wells and the Rhs section, respec-tively (Figure 8).
The third-order Highstand Systems Tract (HST) over-lying the organic-rich early Carnian TST along the North–South Axis is generally represented by shallower deposits,such as gypsum, thin ostracod-bearing white limestonebeds, dark grey marls associated with lignitic debris, andfine-grained sandstones (e.g. Burollet 1956; Chandoulet al. 1993; Soussi et al. 1998; Kamoun et al. 2001). Inthe Tellian domain, thick stromatolitic limestonesinterbedded with calcareous tempestites of the BechateurFormation belonging to the middle Carnian HSTwere deposited in the area (Bechateur, Ras El Koran,Figure 5) and probably in Ichkeul and Hairech meta-morphic structures in northern Tunisia (e.g. Bolze 1954;Ghorabi and Henry 1992; Kamoun et al. 2001), implyinga pronounced diachroneity of this lithostratigraphic unit.However, toward southeastern Tunisia, in the Jeffara andsouth Dahar area, the Black Limestones–Dolostones arereplaced locally by yellow bioturbated dolomite, termedthe Mekraneb Formation by Bouaziz (1986) or Dolomitesinférieures Formation by Busson (1967), which exhibits afossiliferous and glauconitic level at the top, marking theflooding surface (mfs). In the Sidi Toui area (Figure 2),Arfaoui and Montacer (2004) described early Carnianorganic-rich platy dolomitic and limestone levels thatmark the TST. This interval is overlain by greenish ammo-noid-bearing shales marking the HST, which could corre-late with the Middle Gypsum unit in northcentral Tunisiaand to the stromatolitic limestones in the Bechateur, RasEl Korane, Ichkeul, and Hairech localities (Figure 5).
Unfortunately, no data are available from the offshoreGulf of Hammamet or the Mediterranean. Figure 6 is aN–S seismic line and interpreted section in the Gulf ofTunis, near the Dorsale and the Northern Tunisian trough.Early Carnian black shales may also be present within thisbasin on the basis of biostratigraphy from the ROD-1 well.
4.3. Molecular geochemistry and environment ofdeposition
Detailed organic geochemical description of the earlyCarnian black limestones of the Rhéouis Formation and
available early Carnian source rock data from outcropsand wells have been provided by Scallon (1980), Touatiet al. (1995), Smaoui (1996), Soussi et al. (1996), Arfaouiand Montacer (2004), and Soua (2007). Organic-richCarnian black shales are characterized by mixed-typeII/III kerogen, i.e. planktonic marine type II and ligneousand hemicellulosic continental type III kerogen (HI ran-ging between 50 and 250 mg HC/g TOC; OI between 30and 70gCO2/gTOC) with TOC concentrations of up to7.5%, indicating excellent source rock qualities for oiland gas. A sufficient maturity level of these laminatedblack shales is confirmed by Tmax values between 429°Cand 446°C (Figure 11). Organic petrological and palyno-logical studies on these sediments indicate kerogen domi-nated by dark brown to black colour fluorescent organicmatter associated with amorphous organic matter (AOM)(hemicellulosic continental origin). The higher molecularweight n-alkanes reveal a wide range of normal alkanes.The moderate molecular weight n-alkanes and acyclicisoprenoids such as pristine and phytane occur in lowconcentrations in the early Carnian black shales. In addi-tion, they display a smooth homologous series within thehigher molecular weight n-alkane, suggesting a significantinput of higher land plant organic matter into these sedi-ments. The presence of pristine and phytane in lowamounts within these sediments, inferred from the Pr/Phratios, is indicative of a reducing environment (anoxiccondition) and reflect significant input from the chloro-phyll of higher plants, algae, and photosynthetic bacteriaand from archaeobacteria (Cooper 1990). This low Pr/Phratio in the early Carnian organic-rich black shales sug-gests also an aquatic depositional environment under redu-cing bottom conditions (Burgan and Ali 2009). Theinvestigation of triterpanes and steranes within organic-rich Carnian samples taken from Jebel Rhéouis and JebelSidi Toui was performed by Arfaoui and Montacer (2004).Biomarker maturity parameters revealed that this organic-rich series has been subject to deposition within reducingconditions in both areas.
5. Discussion and outlook
5.1. General remarks
The Ladinian–lower Carnian drastic lithological changefrom carbonates (including local organic-rich levels) togypsum, clastic, and terrigenous sedimentation has beenwidely characterized in western Tethyan margins (Golonka2007) and grouped under the Reingraben event (Schlagerand Schöllnberge 1974), which characterizes the well-known CPE (Simms and Ruffell 1989).
In Jebel Rhéouis (Oued El Bhima, Oued El Forka, andKsar Rechaiech sections, Soussi et al. 1996; Kamoun et al.1998), the organic-rich shales and carbonates of the earlyCarnian are represented essentially by fosiliferous beds rich
International Geology Review 1897
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
in (1) bioclasts of lammellibrachs, gastropods, and crinoids,(2) microfaunal assemblages represented by radiolariansand benthic foraminifera, and (3) palynomorphs representedgenerally by circumpolles species and monosaccate forms.Black dolomites, limestones, and organic-rich shales arerich in framboidal pyrites (Soussi et al. 1996). Thissequence overlies bioclastic carbonates and is overlain inturn by a gypsum, shale, and fine-grained sandstone succes-sion witnessing the demise of a supposed carbonate plat-form characterizing the western Tethyan margin (Figure 1).However, remnant carbonate levels in the overlying Carnianseries are documented. These black shales and limestonesrich in framboidal pyrites are documented also in the Gulf
of Tunis within the ROD-1 well (Boufares and Mekki1984), in the CO2-bearing Carnian level of the UTQ-1well (Smaoui 1996), as well as in the Cap Bon (CB-101well, Touati et al. 1995).
In general, pyrite in modem anoxic environments isalmost exclusively represented by framboidal form (e.g.Vallentyne 1963; Schallreuter 1984; Oenema 1990).Ancient anoxic sediments are also documented as rich inframboid pyrites such as in the early Silurian hot shales,Frasnian Kellwasser level, and Cenomanian–TuronianOAE-2 successions (e.g. Riquier et al. 2006; Lüninget al. 2000; Soua and Tribovillard 2007; Soua and Chihi2014; Soua 2014).
Figure 11. Early Carnian maturation zones (Tmax). References for maturation are listed in Table 1.
1898 M. Soua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
In the Tunisian early Carnian case study, the demise ofthe carbonate platform, which is recognized by the onsetof the generalized anoxic conditions inferred from thedeposition of black limestones, dolomites, and shales,does not seem to have occurred suddenly as documentedin the western Tethyan margin (Figure 12; Hornung et al.2007). For the western Tethys, terrigenous input has beensuggested as the factor primarily responsible for thedemise of carbonate platforms and reefal constructions inassociation with the increased salinity related to the con-tinuing break-up of Pangea, extensional movements insome parts, as well as to the increased CO2 emissionrelated to the intense volcanic activity as inferred fromthe northwestern African margin (Tunisia, Morocco,Guinea, Mali, Mauritania) (Weigand and Ragland 1970;Biju-Duval et al. 1977; Bertrand and Coffrant 1977;Laubscher and Bernoulli 1977; Manspeizer et al. 1978;Bertrand et al. 1982; Kurtz 1983).
A monsoonal circulation system has been adopted byParrish (1999) to explain the climatic model of the Carnian inthe Tethyan realm associatedwith a rapid tectonic subsidencerate due to isostatic equilibrium (Garzanti 1999). Theseeffects may be related to the general Tethyan palaeogeo-graphic conditions characterized by the accelerated Pangeabreak-up and the northward separation of the Cimmerianplates from northern African margins (Figure 1).
The Tunisian shelf, which is characterized by thedeposition of a widespread carbonate platform andorganic-rich black limestone and shales in the earlyCarnian with high organic carbon potential up to 7.5%of TOC (in the Rhs section, Soussi et al. 1998) (Figure 2),has been subject to well-stratified ocean water. This
stratification is the primary cause of separating oxygenatedsurface water from anoxic and maybe euxinic deeperwater (e.g. Brumsack 2006; Soua and Tribovillard 2007;Soua 2011). Humid climatic conditions for this time per-iod have been inferred from DJM-1 well by Buratti et al.(2012), who admitted that the early Carnian sporomorphvegetation was composed essentially of bennettitales,cycadales, lycopodiophyta, and equisetophyta. This hygro-phytic assemblage is believed to have been in need ofhumid conditions for reproduction (Visscher et al. 1994;Vakhrameev 2010). This is in concordance with the pre-vailing regional humid and monsoonal climate conditiondefined by Simms and Ruffell (1989) as the CPE and welldocumented in the Tethyan realm (Hochuli and Frank2000; Hornung and Brandner 2005; Hornung et al. 2007;Kozur and Weems 2007; Rigo et al. 2007; Kozur andBachmann 2010). A less-diversified assemblage has beenreported from DE-1 well (Mzoughi et al. 1994), fromJebel Rhéouis (Soussi et al. 2001), and from KEA-5core-drill (Mehdi et al. 2009), which could confirm theextension of the CPE to central Tunisia, albeit with lessstrength than recorded in DJM-1 well (Buratti et al. 2012).
This humid climate in association with the monsoonalactivity (Parrish 1999) would therefore have intensifiedthe water stratification and caused oxygen-depleted(O2-depleted) conditions due to the increased run-off andincoming nutrient.
In addition, and referring to Roghi et al. (2010), thisCarnian anoxic event has been widely characterized espe-cially in the northwestern Tethyan margin and at highlatitudes (Figure 12), which could be a key of correlationto the North African margin.
Tunisia
Algeria
Morocco
Libya Egypt
Pal
estin
e
Italy
Spain
Por
tuga
l
France
Germany
Switz.
TurkeyGreece
BulgariaAlbania
Romania
Ukrania
BelarusPoland
Slovakia
Hungary
Serbia
Austria
Slovenia
Czeck
United Kingdom
Mediterranean Sea
Atlantic Ocean
EXPLANATION
Carnian section
Ocean/Sea
Emerged land
SCALE
N
40°
30°
40°
30°
50°
500 km
Figure 12. Present geographic distribution of the main studied sections around the early Carnian (Julian/Tuvalian boundary) showingthe generalized anoxic event. (Redrawn after Roghi et al. 2010).
International Geology Review 1899
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
5.2. Depositional model
With the proposed depositional model (Figure 7), the sedi-mentation of the Carnian carbonate platform in the Tunisianshelf setting seems to have been complex. It has beendocumented in early studies that this carbonate platformmay continue up to the middle Carnian in Bechateur(Béchateur Formation, Kamoun et al. 2001), the equivalentof the Middle Gypsum unit of Burollet (1956), as well as inUtique (UTQ-1), Gulf of Tunis (ROD-1), and Cap Bon(CB-101), where organic-rich sedimentation continuedthrough the middle Carnian (Boufares and Mekki 1984;Touati et al. 1995; Smaoui 1996; Soua 2007).
The proposed depositional model implies a regionalstructural framework with strongly distensional trendsinduced by the northward separation and movement of theCimmerian plates from the north African margin producinghalf-grabens. This model is associated with the regionalpluvial event (Simms and Ruffell 1989), which triggeredand increased riverine influx due to the enhanced run-offstimulating high productivity in surface waters. Theincreased humidity may be the consequence also of theenhanced CO2 emission associated with the tholeiitic volca-nic activity such as that recorded in northern and northcentralTunisia in the Early to Late Triassic (e.g. Kurtz 1983).
The deposition of the organic-rich black shales hasoften been associated with the intensification and expan-sion of an OMZ along the southern Tethyan marginmainly for the Cenomanian–Turonian OAE-2 model(Barrett 1998; Lüning et al. 2004; Brumsack 2006;Turgeon and Brumsack 2006; Soua and Tribovillard2007; Soua 2011). In most cases, the deposition of theseorganic-rich black shales is accompanied by initial trans-gression prior to and/or within short-lived severe anoxicevents. Taking into account this depositional model, dur-ing early Carnian OMZ development periods, black shaleaccumulated throughout the northern margin of Africa.Oil/gas-prone organic-rich strata have been deposited inthe initial marine sediments of narrow rifts and in parts ofthe subsiding margin (Figure 7).
It is noteworthy that the organic-rich early Carnianlimestones, dolostones, and shales are the principal hydro-carbon source in the Cap Bon peninsula (Touati et al. 1995)and the principal source of CO2 in UTQ-1 (Smaoui 1996).In addition, good hydrocarbon potential has been recentlyoutlined in the Gulf of Tunis in ROD-1 with 2.86% of TOC(Soua 2007). The area underlying the OMZ is characterizedby yellow to white carbonate accumulation, which is thecase of the early Carnian carbonate platform of Bechateurand Ras El Korane (Figures 5 and 7).
Following these observations and the depositionalmodel presented in this paper, we propose to separate theblack limestone member (black limestone, dolostone,shale, or mixed carbonate) from the Rhéouis Formationfor the following reasons:
● The Rhéouis Formation has been defined byBurollet (1956) based on its evaporitic Triassic suc-cession (Burollet 1973; Salaj 1978; Chandoul et al.1993).
● The Triassic system in northern and central Tunisiahas long been divided by geologists on the basis offacies (Keuper, Muschalkak, Alpin, Germanic, etc.)and not on the basis of age constraints, althoughsome stratigraphic progress has been made since theworks of Soussi et al. (2001) on palynomorphs aswell as Kamoun et al. (2001) on benthic foraminifera.
● The Carnian in northern and central Tunisia hasexceptionally recorded the Tethyan palaeogeo-graphic events when compared with neighbouringsouthern Tethyan margin localities in Algeria andMorocco. This sequence is revealed to be similar toseveral sections logged in the northwestern Tethyanmargin such as in Germanic, southern Alps, south-ern Apennines, and Po basins where a thick carbo-nate platform formed including early Carnianorganic-rich shales proven as good source rocks(Stefani and Burchell 1993). A similar sequencehas been described by Touati et al. (1995) in theCap Bon, where the Carnian source rock potentialhas been confirmed using oil/oil correlation and inthe Utique area (Smaoui 1996) where the Carnianblack carbonate flowed over 96% of CO2. Thissequence seems to extend into the Gulf of Tunisbasin with good source rock potential (2.86% ofTOC, Soua 2007).
● The depositional sequence of the Carnian in the dif-ferent studied sections and wells (Table 1), such as inJebel Rhéouis, Koudiat El Alfa, CB-101, ROD-1, andJebel Baouala-Lansarine, is very different from theoverlying series (consisting generally of gypsum, sili-ciclastics, paralic, and continental series).
These arguments seem to be sufficient to revise theTriassic series and give new nomenclature to the differentintervals instead of Rhéouis Formation, which could begraded up to a group rank. We propose the term RaouedFormation for the organic-rich Black Limestones–Dolostones level inferred from the ROD-1 (Raoued-1)well, because it shows a representative section with expli-cit GR signature (Figures 8 and 9).
6. Conclusions
The review of the early Carnian black shales in northern,central (Raoued Formation) as well as in southern(Mekraneb Formation in Jebel Sidi Toui) Tunisia centreson probable highest quality Triassic source rock of thecountry. The deposition of the organic-rich black shaleshas often been associated with intensification and expansion
1900 M. Soua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
of an OMZ along the southern Tethyan margin. In mostcases, the deposition of these organic-rich black shales wasaccompanied by initial transgression resulting from differ-ent mechanisms (accelerated separation of the Cimmerianfragments, distensive regime, rapid tectonic subsidence,climatic pluvial event, monsoonal circulation system, CO2
emission related to tholeiitic volcanism, mixing mechan-isms, etc.) prior to and/or within a short-lived severe anoxicevent. Although this anoxic event is recorded within theRaoued and locally in Mekraneb Formations and detectedby means of geochemistry (TOC) and wireline logs (mainlyGR), unfortunately, no large-scale carbon-isotopic investi-gation or high-resolution biostratigraphic analysis has beenconducted, as required to correlate these worldwide events.The biostratigraphy based on benthic foraminifera and paly-nological investigations has been the subject for the wholeTriassic successions and the early Carnian section did nottake the whole chance of high-resolution biostratigraphicscheme. Dysoxic to anoxic conditions have been interpretedusing molecular geochemical ratios where the presence ofpristine and phytane in low amounts, inferred from thePr/Ph ratios, is indicative of a reducing environment andreflect significant input from the chlorophyll of higherplants, algae, and photosynthetic bacteria. Although pri-mary productivity also could be interpreted from lithologi-cal and faunal content, carbon isotopic investigation has tobe undertaken and coupled with chemostratigraphic analy-sis (major and trace elements) to allow a worldwide corre-lation between the southern and northern Tethyan margins.
AcknowledgementsI would like to thank Professor Richard T.J. Moody (KingstonUniversity London) who provided a thorough review and editedthe English language of the text and an anonymous reviewer forproviding numerous suggestions, which improved the text. Theuseful constructive reviews and suggestions as well as the editor-ial work by the chief editor Robert Stern is much appreciated.The author is also grateful to the Faculty of Sciences at TunisUniversity staff that facilitated the field trip to Jebel Rhéouis andsurrounding area in March 2013 and the fruitful discussions withWalid Ben Ali. Thanks are also given to ETAP (Tunisia), whichfinanced the field trip to Jebel Sidi Toui and the whole Dahar-Jeffara basin in April 2010. Fruitful discussions with OussamaEchihi and Sofien Haddad (ETAP) are also much appreciated.
ReferencesAchab, A., 1970, Le Permo-Trias saharien. Associations palyno-
logiques et leurs applications en stratigraphie [Thèse 3èmecycle]: Univ. d’Alger, Algiers.
Adil, S., 1993, Dynamique du Trias dans le Nord de la Tunisie:Bassins en relais multiples de décrochements, magmatismeet implications minières [Thèse 3éme cycle]: Univ. Tunis II,Tunis.
Adil, S., and Alouani, R., 1996, Découverte du Lias carbonate auJebel Lansarine: Données nouvelles sur le Jurassique duSillon Tunisien: Notes Serv. Géol., v. 62, p. 5–16.
Aït Chayeb, E.H., Youbi, N., El-Boukhari, A., Bouabdelli, M.,and Amrhar, M., 1998, Le volcanisme permien etmésozoïque inférieur du bassin d’Argana (Haut-Atlas occi-dental, Maroc): Un magmatisme intraplaque associé à l’ou-verture de l’Atlantique central: Journal of African EarthSciences, v. 26, no. 4, p. 499–519. doi:10.1016/S0899-5362(98)00029-3
Aït Ouali, R., and Nedjari, A., 1994, La province triasique:vingtans d’informations géologiques. Un bilan critique,Internal report, Sonatrach
Aït Salem, H., 1992, Le Trias détritique de l’Oued Mya (Saharaalgérien); sédimentation éstuarienne, diagenèse etporogenèse, potentialite¤s pétrolières, Documents D.S.T.,Univ. Claude Bernard 120, Lyon.
Alsharhan, A.S., and Magara, K., 1994, The Jurassic of the ArabianGulf Basin: Facies, depositional setting and hydrocarbon habi-tat, in Embry, A.F., Beauchamp, B., and Glass, D.J., eds.,Pangea: Global Environment and Resources: CanadianSociety of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, Vol. 17, p. 397–412.
Arfaoui, A., and Montacer, M., 2004, Trlterpane and steranebiomarkers in organic matter from Carnlan organic-rich faclesln central and southern Tunlsla: GeoActa, v. 3, p. 15–23.
Askri, H., Belmecheri, A., Benrabah, B., Boudjema, A.,Boumendjel, K., Daoudi, M., and Terkmani, M., 1995,Geology of Algeria, in In Well Evaluation ConferenceAlgeria, p. 1–93.
Baird, A., 1963, Contribution à l’étude palynoplanctologique duTrias en France et en Afrique du Nord [Thèse 3ème cycle]:Dijon, Univ. Dijon.
Barrett, P., 1998, A comparative organic geochemical and stableisotope study of the Cenomanian–Turonian organic-richsediments from Tunisia, Germany and the UK [Ph.D. thesis]:University of Newcastle. 250p.
Beauchamp, J., 1988, Triassic sedimentation in the High Atlas(Morocco), Manspeizer, W. ed., Triassic–Jurassic Rifting:Developments in Geotectonics 22 Amsterdam, Elsevier,p. 477–497.
Bedir, M., 1995, Mécanismes géodynamiques des bassinsassociés aux couloirs de coulissements de la marge atlasiquede la tunisie: seismostratigraphie, seismotectonique et impli-cations pétrolières [Thèse Doctorat és-Sciences]: Tunis,Univ. Tunis II.
Bedir, M., Boukadi, N., Tlig, S., Timzal, F.B., Zitouni, L.,Alouani, R., and Zargouni, F., 2001, Subsurface Mesozoicbasins in the central Atlas of Tunisia: Tectonics, sequencedeposit distribution, and hydrocarbon potential: AAPGBulletin, v. 85, no. 5, p. 0885–0908.
Ben Ferjani, A., Burollet, P.F., and Mejri, F., 1990, PetroleumGeology of Tunisia: Tunis, Entreprise Tunisienne d’ActivitésPétrolières (ETAP), p. 194.
Benaouiss, N., 1990, Grès de l’Oukaïmeden (Trias supérieur duHaut-Atlas de Marrakech, Maroc); dynamique des corpssédimentaires, argiles, bore et paléoenvironnement [Thèse]:Marrakech, Univ. Marrakech.
Benaouiss, N., Courel, L., and Beauchamp, J., 1996, Rift-con-trolled fluvial/tidal transitional series in the Oukai¨medenSandstones, High Atlas of Marrakesh (Morocco):Sedimentary Geology, v. 107, p. 21–36. doi:10.1016/S0037-0738(96)00013-9
Bertrand, H., and Coffrant, D., 1977, Geochemistry of tholeiitesfrom North-East American margin; correlation withMorocco: Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology,v. 63, no. 1, p. 65–74. doi:10.1007/BF00371676
Bertrand, H., Dostal, J., and Dupuy, C., 1982, Geochemistry ofEarly Mesozoic tholeiites from Morocco: Earth and
International Geology Review 1901
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
Planetary Science Letters, v. 58, no. 2, p. 225–239.doi:10.1016/0012-821X(82)90196-0
Biely, A., and Rakus, M., 1972, Analyse critique des données surI’âge du Salifère en Tunisie septentrionale, Notes ServoGeol. Tunisie, Tunis, p. 35–48.
Biju-Duval, B., Dercourt, J., and Le Pichon, X., 1977, From theTethys ocean to the Mediterranean seas: A plate tectonicmodel of the evolution of the western Alpine system, inBiju-Duval, B., and Montadert, L., eds., Histoire structuraledes bassins méditerranéens: Éditions Technip, Paris, 143p.
Biron, P.E., 1982, Le Permo-Trias de la region de l’Ourika (Haut-Atlas de Marrakech, Maroc) [Thèse de Doctorat]: UniversitéScientifique et Médicale de Grenoble.
Bolze, J., 1954, Age des séries schisteuses et dolomitiques del’Ichkeul et de l’Hairch (Tunisie septentrionale): C. R. Acad.Sci. Paris, v. 20, p. 2008–2010.
Bonnefous, J., 1967, Jurassic stratigraphy of Tunisia: A tentativesynthesis (Northern and central Tunisia, Sahel and Chotts areas),in Martin, L., ed., Guide Book to the Geology and History ofTunisia: Amsterdam, Holland-Breumel-hof NV., p. 109–190.
Bouaziz, S., 1986, La déformation dans la plate-forme du Sud-tunisien (Dahar et Jeffara): Approche multiscalaire et multi-disciplinaire [Thèse Doct. 3ème cycle Sciences]: Tunis,Univ. Tunis, v. de 180p.
Bouaziz, S., Barrier, E., Soussi, M., Turki, M.M., and Zouari, H.,2002, Tectonic evolution of the northern African margin inTunisia from paleostress data and sedimentary record:Tectonophysics, v. 357, p. 227–253. doi:10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00370-0
Boufares, T., and Mekki, M., 1984, Rapport de fin de sondageRaoued N°1 (ROD-1), internal report SEREPT 30p.
Brumsack, H.-J., 2006, The trace metal content of recent organiccarbon-rich sediments: Implications for Cretaceous blackshale formation: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, v. 232, no. 2–4, p. 344–361. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.05.011
Bryan, W.B., Frey, F.A., and Thompson, G., 1977, Oldest atlanticseafloor: Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 64,no. 2, p. 223–242. doi:10.1007/BF00371513
Buratti, N., Mehdi, D., Cirilli, S., Kamoun, F., and Mzoughi, M.,2012, A Carnian (Julian) microflora from the Djerba Melita 1Borehole (Gulf of Gabes, South-Eastern Tunisia):Micropaleontology, v. 58, no. 4, p. 377–388.
Burgan, A.M., and Ali, C.A., 2009, An organic geochemicalinvestigation on organic rich sediments from two Neogeneformations in the Klias Peninsula area, West Sabah,Malaysia: Chinese Journal of Geochemistry, v. 28, no. 3,p. 264–270. doi:10.1007/s11631-009-0264-x
Burollet, P.F., 1956, Contribution à l’étude stratigraphique de laTunisie centrale: Annales des mines et de geologie de Tunis,v. 18, p. 1–345.
Burollet, P.F., 1973, Importance des facteurs saliferes dans latectonique tunisienne: Livre Jubilaire M. Solignac, Ann.Mines Geol. Tunis, no. 26 p. 111–120.
Burollet, P.F., and Dumestre, A., 1952, Le Djebel Rheouis,Remarques sur un percement diapirique. XIX Congr. Geol.Int. Alger, Monogr. Region., Tunis, ser. 2, no. 6, p. 121–125.
Burollet, P.F., Mugniot, J.M., and Sweeney, P., 1978, The geol-ogy of the Pelagian Block: The margins and basins offsouthern Tunisia and Tripolitania, in Nairn, A.E.M., Kanes,W.H., and Stehli, F.G., eds., The ocean basins and margins:New York and London, Plenum Press, p. 331–359.
Busson, G., 1967, Le Mésozoique saharien, 1ère partie:l’Extreme-Sud tunisien. Publication Centre Recherche desZones Arides, Géologie, C.N.R.S., Paris, 8: 194 p.
Busson, G., 1971, Principes, méthodes et résultats d’une étudestratigraphique du Mésozoïque saharien [Thèse]: Paris, Univ.Paris VI.
Calzada, S., Peybernès, B., Kamoun, F., and Ben Youssef, M.,1994, Tunethyris, un nouveau genre de Brachiopode duTrias de Tunisie centrale: Revue de paléobiologie, v. 13,p. 117–124.
Castany, G., and Degalier, R., 1956, Carte géologique de laTunisie, Feuille de Sbiba, no 69, au 1/50 000, noticeexplicative.
Chandoul, H., Burollet, P.F., Ben Ferjani, A., and Memmi, L.,1993, Recueil des coupes types de Tunisie, Trias etJurassique. Entreprise Tunis. Activités Pétral., ETAP Mem.,4, 96 p., Tunis.
Cooper, B.S., 1990, Practical petroleum geochemistry: London,Robertson Scientific.
Courel, L., Aït Salem, H., Benaouiss, N., Et-Touhami, M.,Fekirine, B., Oujidi, M., Soussi, M., and Tourani, A., 2003,Mid-Triassic to Early Liassic clastic/evaporitic deposits overthe Maghreb Platform: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, v. 196, p. 157–176. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00317-1
Cousminer, H.L., and Manspeizer, W., 1977, Autunian and car-nian palynoflorules contribution to the chronology and tec-tonic history of the Moroccan Pre-Atlantic borderland:Stratigraphic Micropaleontology of Atlantic Basin andBorderlands, v. 6, p. 185–204. doi:10.1016/S0920-5446(08)70352-2
Couture, R., and Marti, J., 1965, Rapport géologique final dusondage Cap Bon N° 101 (CB-101), internal report Serept,50p.
Crampon, N., 1971, Etude Geologique de la Bordure desMogods, du Pays de Bizerte et du Nord des Hedil (TunisieSeptentrionale), These, Nancy, 3 v.
Dercourt, J., Ricou, L.E., and Vrielynck, B., editors, 1993, AtlasTethys Paleoenvironmental Maps: Paris, Gauthier-Villars.
El Youssi, M., 1986, Sédimentologie et paléoge¤graphie duPermo-Trias du Haut-Atlas central (Maroc): Grenoble,Thèse Univ. Grenoble
Et-Touhami, M., 1994, Le Trias évaporitique du bassin deKhémisset (Maroc central), Géométrie des dépôts,évolution sédimentaire et géochimie. Notes et Mém. Serv.Géol. Maroc 373, Rabat
Fournet, A., Lajmi, T., and Pini, S., 1994, Carte géologique de laTunisie, Feuille de Mateur, n°12 au 1/50.000, noticexplicative
Garzanti, E., 1999, Stratigraphy and sedimentary history of theNepal Tethys Himalaya passive margin: Journal of AsianEarth Sciences, v. 17, no. 5–6, p. 805–827. doi:10.1016/S1367-9120(99)00017-6
Ghorabi, M., and Henry, B., 1992, Etude paleomagnetique dansles formations detritiques du Jebel Hairech (Tunisie) et impli-cations stratigraphiques et structurales: Bulletin de la SocieteGeologique De France, v. 163, no. 2, p. 187–194.
Glintzboeckel, C., 1956, Presence de Trocholines dans Ie Triasde Tunisie, C.R. Soc. France, Paris, p. 238-240.
Golonka, J., 2002, Plate-tectonic Maps of the Phanerozoic,Kiessling, W., Flügel, E., and Golonka, J., eds.,Phanerozoic Reef Patterns: SEPM (Society for SedimentaryGeology) Special Publication, Vol. 72, p. 21–75.
Golonka, J., 2004, Plate tectonic evolution of the southern marginof Eurasia in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic: Tectonophysics, v.381, p. 235–273. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2002.06.004
Golonka, J., 2007, Late Triassic and Early Jurassic palaeogeo-graphy of the world: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
1902 M. Soua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
Palaeoecology, v. 244, no. 1–4, p. 297–307. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.06.041
Golonka, J., and Ford, D.W., 2000, Pangean (LateCarboniferous–Middle Jurassic) paleoenvironment and litho-facies: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,v. 161, p. 1–34. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00115-2
Grasso, M., Torelli, L., and Mazzoldi, G., 1999, Cretaceous–Palaeogene sedimentation patterns and structural evolutionof the Tunisian shelf, offshore the Pelagian islands (centralMediterranean): Tectonophysics, v. 315, no. 1–4, p. 235–250. doi:10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00285-1
Gueinn, K.J., 1980, Well Ben Kreir N°1, Final palynostratigraphi-cal report on selected samples from interval 363 m–4592 m,project n°691, June 1980, Internal report Amoco Tunisia OilCompany, 11p
Guiraud, R., 1998, Mesozoic rifting and basin inversion alongthe northern African Tethyan margin: An overview:Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 132,no. 1, p. 217–229. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.132.01.13
Ha, N.T.B., 2009, Geochemical modeling study for Guellala &Tanit permits, Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia, internal report PVEPTunisia, 116p.
Haq, B.U., Hardenbol, J., and Vail, P.R., 1987, Chronology offluctuating sea levels since the Triassic: Science, v. 235, no.4793, p. 1156–1167. doi:10.1126/science.235.4793.1156
Hardenbol, J., Thierry, J., Farley, M.B., Jacquin, T., DeGraciansky, P.C., and Vail, P.R., 1998, Mesozoic andCenozoic sequence stratigraphy of European basins, in DeGraciansky, P.-C., Hardenbol, J., Jacquin, Th., and Vail, P.R.,eds., SEPM Special Publication 60. ISBN 1-56576-043-3.
Hochuli, P.A., 1998, Spore-pollen, in De Graciansky, P.-C.,Hardenbol, J., Jacquin, Th., and Vail, P.R., eds., Mesozoicand Cenozoic sequence stratigraphy of European basins:SEPM Special Publication, 60. ISBN 1-56576-043-3.
Hochuli, P.A., and Frank, S.M., 2000, Palynology (dinoflagellatecysts, spore-pollen) and stratigraphy of the Lower CarnianRaibl Group in the Eastern Swiss Alps: Eclogae geol. Helv,v. 93, p. 429–443.
Hornung, T., and Brandner, R., 2005, Biochronostratigraphy ofthe Reingraben Turnover (Hallstatt Facies Belt): Local blackshale events controlled by regional tectonics, climatic changeand plate tectonics: Facies, v. 51, no. 1–4, p. 460–479.doi:10.1007/s10347-005-0061-x
Hornung, T., Brandner, R., Krystyn, L., Joachimski, M.M., andKeim, L., 2007, Multistratigraphic constrains on the NWTethyan “Carnian crisis”, in Lucal, S.G., and Spielmann, J.A., eds., The Global Triassic: Albuquerque, New MexicoMuseum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, Vol. 41,p. 59–67.
Jongsma, D., Van Hinte, J.E., and Woodside, J.M., 1985, Geologicstructure and neotectonics of the North African ContinentalMargin south of Sicily: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 2,p. 156–179. doi:10.1016/0264-8172(85)90005-4
Kamoun, F., Peybernès, B., Ciszak, R., and Calzada, S., 2001,Triassic palaeogeography of Tunisia: Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 172, no. 3–4, p. 223–242. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(01)00283-8
Kamoun, F., Peybernès, B., Martini, R., Zaninetti, L., Vila, J.-M.,Trigui, A., and Rigane, A., 1998, Associations de foraminifèresbenthiques dans les séquences de dépôt du Trias moyen?Supérieur de l’Atlas tunisien central et méridional: Geobios, v.31, p. 703–714. doi:10.1016/S0016-6995(98)80104-6
Khessibi, M., and Pacaud, M., 1968, Rapport géologique final ducore-drill Koudiat El Alfa n°5 (KEA-5), internal reportSerept 14p.
Köppen, A., and Carter, A., 2000, Constraints on provenanceof the central European Triassic using detrital zircon fis-sion track data: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, v. 161, p. 193–204. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00123-1
Kozur, H.W., and Bachmann, G.H., 2010, The Middle Carnianwet intermezzo of the Stuttgart formation (Schilfsandstein),Germanic basin: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, v. 290, no. 1–4, p. 107–119. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.11.004
Kozur, H.W., and Weems, R.E., 2007, Upper Triassic conchos-tracan biostratigraphy of the continental rift basins of easternNorth America: Its importance for correlating NewarkSupergroup events with the Germanic Basin and the interna-tional geologic time scale: New Mexico Museum of NaturalHistory and Science Bulletin, v. 41, p. 137–188.
Kurtz, J., 1983, Geochemistry of Early mesozoic basalts fromTunisia: Journal of African Earth Sciences (1983), v. 1, no. 2,p. 113–125. doi:10.1016/0899-5362(83)90003-9
Kutek, J., 2001, The Polish Permo–Mesozoic Rift Basin, inZiegler, P.A., Cavazz, W., Robertson, A.H.F., andCrasquin-Soleau, S., eds., Peri-Tethyan Rift/Wrench Basinsand Passive Margins: Paris, Muséum National d’HistoireNaturelle, Vol. 186, p. 213–236.
Laubscher, H., and Bernoulli, D., 1977, Mediterranean and Tethys,The ocean basins and margins, in Nairn, A.E.M., Kanes, W.H., and Stehli, F.G., eds., The Eastern Mediterranean: NewYork, Springer, p. 1–28.
Laville, E., Pique, A., Amrhar, M., and Charroud, M., 2004, Arestatement of the Mesozoic Atlasic Rifting (Morocco):Journal of African Earth Sciences, v. 38, p. 145–153.doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2003.12.003
Lawver, L.A., and Gahagan, L.M., 1993, Subduction zones,magmatism, and the breakup of Pangea, in Stone, D.B.,and Runcorn, S.K., eds., Flow and Creep in the SolarSystem: Observations, Modeling and Theory: NATO ASISeries C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 308,Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 225–247.
Litwin, R.J., Traverse, A., and Ash, S.R., 1991, Preliminarypalynological zonation of the Chinle Formation, southwes-tern U.S.A., and its correlation to the Newark Supergroup(eastern U.S.A.): Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology,v. 68, p. 269–287. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(91)90028-2
Lüning, S., Craig, J., Loydell, D.K., Štorch, P., and Fitches, B.,2000, Lower Silurian `hot shales’ in North Africa andArabia: Regional distribution and depositional model:Earth-Science Reviews, v. 49, no. 1–4, p. 121–200.doi:10.1016/S0012-8252(99)00060-4
Lüning, S., Kolonic, S., Belhadj, E.M., Belhadj, Z., Cota, L.,Barić, G., and Wagner, T., 2004, Integrated depositionalmodel for the Cenomanian–Turonian organic-rich strata inNorth Africa: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 64, no. 1, p. 51–117.
Macdonald, D., Gomez-Perez, I., Francese, J., Spalletti, L.,Lawver, L., Gahagan, L., Dalziel, I., Thomas, C., Trewin,N., Hole, M., and Paton, D., 2003, Mesozoic break-up of SWGondwana: Implications for regional hydrocarbon potentialof the southern South Atlantic, in Golonka, J., ed., ThematicSet on Paleogeographic Reconstruction and HydrocarbonBasins: Atlantic, Caribbean, South America, Middle East,Russian Far East, Arctic: Marine and Petroleum Geology:Amsterdam, Elsevier, Vol. 20, p. 287–308.
Mami, L., 1980, Etude palynologique du sondage REH-1,Internal report, Sonatrach.
Mami, L., 1989, Etude palynologique des sondages HEB-1, RN-11, RHA-1, REK-1, EKR-1, Internal report, Sonatrach.
International Geology Review 1903
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
Mami, L., and Bourmouche, R., 1994, Résultats palynostratigra-phiques des formations triasiques de la région d’El Biod,Internal report, Sonatrach.
Manspeizer, W., 1988, Triassic-Jurassic rifting and opening ofthe Atlantic: An overview, in Manspeizer, W., ed., Triassic-Jurassic rifting: Developments in Geotectonics: Amsterdam,Elsevier, Vol. 22, p. 41–79.
Manspeizer, W., Puffer, J.H., and Cousminer, H.L., 1978,Separation of Morocco and Eastern North America: ATriassic-Liassic stratigraphic record: Geological Society ofAmerica Bulletin, v. 89, p. 901–920. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1978)89<901:SOMAEN>2.0.CO;2
Mattis, A.F., 1977, Non-marine Triassic sedimentation, centralHigh Atlas, Morocco: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,v. 47, p. 107–119.
Mehdi, D., Cirilli, S., Buratti, N., Kamoun, F., and Trigui, A.,2009, Palynological characterisation of the Lower Carnian ofthe KEA5 borehole (Koudiat El Halfa Dome; Central Atlas,Tunisia): Geobios, v. 42, no. 1, p. 63–71. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2008.06.002
Morgan, M.A., Grocott, J., and Moody, R.T.J., 1998, The structuralevolution of the Zaghouan-Ressas Structural Belt, NorthernTunisia: Geological Society, London, Special Publications,v. 132, p. 405–422. 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.132.01.23
Mostler, H., and Scheuring, B.W., 1974, Mikrofloren aus demLangobard und Cordevol der Nördlichen Kalkalpen und dasProblem des Beginns der Keupersedimentation imGermanischen Raum: Innsbruck, Institut für Geologie undPaläontologie.
Mzoughi, M., Dufaure, P.H., and Peybernes, B., 1992, Donnéesnouvelles sur le Jurassique du golfe de Gabès autour de l’ilede Djerba (Tunisie): CRAS Paris, v. 315, no. 2, p. 565–370.
Mzoughi, M., Kilani-Mazraoui, F., and Peybernès, B., 1994,Mise en évidence micropaléontologique du Trias dans lesforages du golfe de Gabès (Tunisie): Geobios, v. 27, no. 4,p. 413–420. doi:10.1016/S0016-6995(09)90020-1
Oenema, O., 1990, Pyrite accumulation in salt marshes in theEastern Scheldt, southwest Netherlands: Biogeochemistry,v. 9, no. 1, p. 75–98. doi:10.1007/BF00002718
Olsen, P.E., 1997, Stratigraphic record of the early Mesozoicbreakup of Pangea in the Laurasia–Gondwana rift system:Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 25,p. 337–401. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.25.1.337
Oujidi, M., Courel, L., Benaouiss, N., El Mostaïne, M., ElYoussi, M., Et-Touhami, M., Ouarhache, D., Sabaoui, A.,and Tourani, A., 2000, Triassic series of Morocco:Stratigraphy, palaeogeography and structuring of theSouthwestern Peri- Tethyan Platform. An overview, inCrasquin-Soleau, S., and Barrier, E., eds., New data onPeri-Tethyan sedimentary Basins: Peri-Tethys Mémoir 5,Paris, Mémoires du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle,Vol. 182, p. 23–38.
Parrish, J.T., 1999, Pangaea und das Klima der Trias, inHauschke, N., and Wilde, V., eds., Trias – eine ganz andereWelt: München, Pfeil Verlag, p. 37–42.
Perthuisot, V., 1981, Diapirism in northern Tunisia: Journal ofStructural Geology, v. 3, no. 3, p. 231–235. doi:10.1016/0191-8141(81)90019-5
Petit, J.-P., and Beauchamp, J., 1986, Synsedimentary faultingand palaeocurrent patterns in the Triassic sandstones of theHigh Atlas (Morocco): Sedimentology, v. 33, p. 817–829.doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.1986.tb00984.x
Peybernes, B., Kamoun, F., Ben Youssef, M., Trigui, A.,Ghanmi, M., Zarbout, M., and Frechengues, M., 1993,Sequence stratigraphy and micropaleontology of the
Triassic series from the Southern part of Tunisia: Journal ofAfrican Earth Sciences (and the Middle East), v. 17, p. 293–305. doi:10.1016/0899-5362(93)90074-Z
Philip, J., 2003, Peri-Tethyan neritic carbonate areas: Distributionthrough time and driving factors: Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 196, p. 19–37.doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00311-0
Philip, J., Masse, J.-P., and Camoin, G., 1996, Tethyan CarbonatePlatforms, in Nairn, A.E.M., Ricou, L.-E., Vrielynck, B., andDercourt, J., eds., The Tethys Ocean: The Oceans Basins andMargin: New York, Plenum Press, Vol. 8, p. 239–266.
Reyre, Y., 1973, Palynologie du Mésozoïque saharien: Mém.Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., v. 27, p. 1–284.
Rigo, M., Preto, N., Roghi, G., Tateo, F., and Mietto, P., 2007, Arise in the carbonate Compensation Depth of western Tethysin the Carnian (Late Triassic): Deep-water evidence for theCarnian Pluvial Event: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, v. 246, 2007 p. 188–205. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.09.013
Riquier, L., Tribovillard, N., Averbuch, O., Devleeschouwer, X.,and Riboulleau, A., 2006, The Late Frasnian Kellwasserhorizons of the Harz Mountains (Germany): Two oxygen-deficient periods resulting from different mechanisms:Chemical Geology, v. 233, no. 1–2, p. 137–155.doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.02.021
Roghi, G., 2004, Palynological investigation in the Carnian ofthe Cave del Predil area (Julian Alps, NE Italy): Rev.Palaeobot. Palynol., v. 73, p. 774–789.
Roghi, G., Gianolla, P., Minarelli, L., Pilati, C., and Preto, N.,2010, Palynological correlation of Carnian humid pulsesthroughout western Tethys: Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 290, no. 1–4, p. 89–106. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.11.006
Salaj, J., 1969, Essai de zonations dans le Trias des Carpathesoccidentales d’après les Foraminifères: Geol. Prace, v. 48,p. 123–128. Bratislava
Salaj, J., 1978, The geology of the Pelagian Block: The easternTunisian platform, in Nairn, A.E.M., Kanes, W.H., andStehli, F.G., eds., The Ocean Basins and Margins: Volume4B, The Western Mediterranean, New York and London,Plenum Press, p. 361–416.
Salaj, J., and Bajanik, S., 1972, Essai de subdivision lithostrati-graphique du Trias de la Tunisie septentrionale: Notes Serv.géol. Tunis, v. 38, p. 27–33.
Salaj, J., and Mzoughi, M., 1997, Données nouvelles sur lamicrobiostratigraphie (foraminifères) et la paléogéographiedu trias de Tunisie, Zemni Plyn a nafta, Hodonin:Cervenec, v. 42, no. 1, p. 3–29.
Salaj, J., and Stranik, Z., 1970, Rhétien dans l’Atlas Tunisienoriental: Notes Serv. Géol. Tunisie, v. 32, no. 3, p. 37–44.
Salvan, H.M., 1984, Les formations e¤vaporitiques du Triasmarocain. Problèmes stratigraphiques, paléoge¤ographiqueset paléoclimatologiques. Quelques réflexions: Rev. géol. dyn.Géogr. phys, v. 25, p. 187–203.
Scallon, J., 1980, Ben Kreir n°1 final well report (BK-1), internalreport Amoco Tunisia Oil Company, 67p
Schallreuter, R. 1984, Framboidal pyrite in deep-sea sediments,Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 75(JUN),875–891.
Schlager, W., and Schöllnberge, W., 1974, Das Prinzip stratigra-phischer Wenden in der Schichtfolge der NördlichenKalkalpen: Mitt. Geol. Ges, v. 66–67, p. 165–193.
Scotese, C.R., and Langford, R.P., 1995, Pangea and the paleo-geography of the Permian, The Permian of Northern Pangea:Berlin Heidelberg, Springer, p. 3–19.
1904 M. Soua
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4
Sengör, A.M.C., 1984, The Cimmeride orogenic system and thetectonics of Eurasia: Geological Society of America SpecialPaper 195, p. 1–82.
Sengör, A.M.C., and Natalin, B.A., 1996, Paleotectonics of Asia:Fragment of a synthesis, in Yin, A., and Harrison, T.M., eds.,The Tectonic Evolution of Asia: Cambridge, CambridgeUniversity Press, p. 486–640.
Simms, M.J., and Ruffell, A.H., 1989, Synchroneity of climaticchange and extinctions in the Late Triassic: Geology, v. 17,p. 265–268. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1989)017<0265:SOCCAE>2.3.CO;2
Smaoui, J., 1996, Utique#1 Djebel Oust Permit, final geologicalreport (UTQ-1), Internal report Maxus Tunisia Inc., 61p.
Soua, M., 2007, Evaluation du potentiel pétrolier du bloc libreKorbous (N5) (offshore Nord-Est Tunisien), Internal reportETAP SRI-200-08-00, 46p.
Soua, M., 2011, Le Passage Cénomanien-Turonien en Tunisie:biostratigraphie, chimiostratigraphie, cyclostratigraphie etstratigraphie séquentielle, 73fig, 16pl. [Ph.D. thesis]:Université de Tunis El Manar, Tunisia, 420p.
Soua, M., 2014, Paleozoic oil/gas shale reservoirs in southernTunisia: An overview: Journal of African Earth Sciences,v. 100, p. 450–492. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.07.009
Soua, M., and Chihi, H., 2014, Optimizing exploration procedureusing Oceanic Anoxic events as new tool for hydrocarbonstrategy in Tunisia, Chapter Book in Gaci, S., and Hachay,O., eds., Advances in data, methods, models and their appli-cations in oil/gas exploration: New York, Science PublishingGroup, p. 55p.
Soua, M., and Smaoui, J., 2008, Mesozoic and Cenozoic paleo-geography and petroleum potential of the Gulf of Tunis,Tunisia, in Proceedings of the 10th Exploration andProduction Conference, Memoir n°27, p. 180–193.
Soua, M., and Tribovillard, N., 2007, Modèle de sédimentationau passage Cénomanien/Turonien pour la formation Bahloulen Tunisie: Comptes Rendus Geoscience, v. 339, p. 692–701. doi:10.1016/j.crte.2007.08.002
Soussi, M., 2000, Le Jurassique de la Tunisie atlasique:Stratigraphie, Dynamique sédimentaire, Paléogéographieet Intérêt Pétrolier [Thèse doctorat és-Sci.]: Tunis, Univ.Tunis II.
Soussi, M., Abbes, C., and Belayouni, H., 1998, Sedimentaryrecord of sea level changes and associated organic-rich facieson the southern Tehyan margin: The Upper Triassic of cen-tral Tunisia: African Geoscience Review, v. 5, p. 275–285.
Soussi, M., Abbès, C., Belayouni, H., and Boukadi, N., 1996,Sédimentologie, stratigraphie séquentielle et caractéristiquesgéochimiques des séries du Trias moyen et supérieur del’Axe nord–sud (Tunisie centrale), in Proceedings of the5th Tunisian Exploration & Production Conference (EPC),ETAP, Memoir n◦10, p. 275–285.
Soussi, M., Cirilli, S., and Abbes, C., 2001, Nouvellesdonnées palynologiques sur la formation Rhéouis:Conséquences sur les corrélations et la paléogéographiede la Tunisie au Trias supérieur, Notes du ServiceGeéologique Tunisie, p. 1–67
Stefani, M.M., and Burchell, M.T., 1993, A review of the UpperTriassic source rocks of Italy, Generation, Accumulation andProduction of Europe’s Hydrocarbons III: Berlin Heidelberg,Springer, p. 169–178.
Touati, M.A., Dembicki Jr., H., and Ten Have, L.E., 1995,Northeast Tunisia foreland basin: Source rock characteriza-tion and petroleum Habitat, in Proceedings of the seminar onsource rocks and hydrocarbon habitat in Tunisia, Memoir n°9, p. 69–70.
Touati, M.A., and Rodgers, M.R. 1998, Tectonostratigraphichistory of the southern Gulf of Gabes and the hydrocarbonhabitats, in Proceedings of the 6th Exploration andProduction Conference, ETAP memoir n° 12, p. 343–370.
Tourani, A., Lund, J.J., Benaouiss, N., and Gaupp, R., 1998,Stratigraphy of Triassic syn-rift deposition in WesternMorocco: Zbl. Geol. Pala«ontol. I. v. 9–10, p. 1193–1215.
Turgeon, S., and Brumsack, H.-J., 2006, Anoxic vs dysoxicevents reflected in sediment geochemistry during theCenomanian-Turonian Boundary Event (Cretaceous) in theUmbria-Marche Basin of central Italy: Chemical Geology, v.234, p. 321–339. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.05.008
Turki, M.M., 1985, Polycinématique et contrôle sédimentaireassocié sur la cicatrice Zaghouan-Nebhana, Thèse de Doct.d’État (es) Sci. Nat. (Géologie), Fac. Sci. Tunis. RevueSciences de la. Terre Tunis, INRST éditeur, 7, p. 252.
Vail, P.R., 1987, Seismic stratigraphy interpretation usingsequence stratigraphy, in Bally, A.W., ed., AAPG Studiesin Geology #27, volume 1: Atlas of Seismic Stratigraphy,Houston, TX, American Association of Petroleum Geologist(AAPG) Annual Convention Short Course, p. 1–10.
Vail, P.R., 1988, Sequence stratigraphy workbook, fundamentalsof sequence stratigraphy, in AAPG Annual Convention ShortCourse, Sequence Stratigraphy Interpretation of Seismic,Wells and Outcrop Data: Houston, TX, AmericanAssociation of Petroleum Geologist (AAPG) AnnualConvention Short Course.
Vakhrameev, V.A., 2010, Jurassic and Cretaceous Floras andClimates of the Earth, in Hughes, N.F., ed., Cambridge,Cambridge University Press.
Vallentyne, J.R., 1963, Isolation of pyrite spherules from recentsediments: Limnology and Oceanography, v. 8, no. 1, p. 16–30. doi:10.4319/lo.1963.8.1.0016
Veevers, J.J., 1994, Pangea: Evolution of a supercontinent and itsconsequences for Earth’s paleoclimate and sedimentaryenvironments, in Klein, G.D., ed., Pangea: Paleoclimate,Tectonics and Sedimentation during Accretion, Zenith andBreakup of a Supercontinent: Geological Society of AmericaSpecial Paper, Volume 228, p. 13–23.
Veevers, J.J., 2004, Gondwanaland from 650–500 Ma assemblythrough 320 Ma merger in Pangea to 185–100 Ma breakup:Supercontinental tectonics via stratigraphy and radiometricdating: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 68, p. 1–132. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.05.002
Visscher, H., Van Houte, M., Brugman, W.A., and Poort, R.J.,1994, Rejection of a Carnian (Late Triassic) “pluvialevent” in Europe: Review of Palaeobotany andPalynology, v. 83, no. 1–3, p. 217–226. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(94)90070-1
Weigand, P.W., and Ragland, P.C., 1970, Geochemistry ofMesozoic dolerite dikes from eastern North America:Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 29, no. 3,p. 195–214. doi:10.1007/BF00373305
Withjack, M.O., Schlische, R.W., and Olsen, P.O., 1998,Diachronous rifting, drifting, and inversion on the passivemargin of central eastern North America: An analog for otherpassive margins: AAPG Bulletin, v. 82, p. 817–835.
Ziegler, P.A., 1982, Geological Atlas of Western and CentralEurope: The Hague, Shell Internationale Petroleum Mij. B. V.
Ziegler, P.A., 1988, Evolution of the Arctic–North Atlantic andthe Western Tethys: AAPG Memoir, v. 43, p. 1–198.
Zonenshain, L.P., Kuzmin, M.L., and Natapov, L.N., 1990,Geology of the USSR: A plate-tectonic synthesis:American Geophysical Union, Geodynamics Series, v. 21,p. 1–242.
International Geology Review 1905
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
188.
117.
111.
129]
at 2
2:29
30
Oct
ober
201
4